Registration Document 2013  
Contents  
1
. Key figures  
4. Other social, community development  
and environmental information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .190  
1. Operating and market data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1  
. Selected financial information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2  
5
6
.
.
Reporting scopes and method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192  
Third party assurance report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .195  
2
2
. Business overview  
8
9
1
. TOTAL and its shareholders  
1. History and strategy of TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8  
2. Upstream segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9  
3. Refining & Chemicals segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39  
4. Marketing & Services segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .48  
5. Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53  
6. Organizational structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54  
7. Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55  
8. Organization chart as of December 31, 2013 . . . . .56  
1. Listing details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .200  
2. Dividend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .204  
3. Share buybacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .206  
4. Shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .210  
5. Information for foreign shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . .214  
6. Investor Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216  
. General information  
3
4
5
. Management Report  
1. Share capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222  
2. Articles of incorporation and by laws;  
1. Summary of results and financial position . . . . . . . .60  
2. Liquidity and capital resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66  
3. Research & Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68  
4. Trends and outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71  
5. Significant changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72  
other information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .226  
. Historical financial information and other information 230  
. Documents on display . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .231  
. Information on holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .231  
3
4
5
0. Consolidated Financial Statements  
. Risk factors  
1. Statutory auditor’s report on the  
1. Financial risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74  
2. Industrial and environmental risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82  
3. Other risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85  
4. Legal and arbitration proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94  
5. Insurance and risk management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97  
Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . .234  
. Consolidated statement of income . . . . . . . . . . . . .235  
. Consolidated statement  
2
3
of comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .236  
. Consolidated balance sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .237  
. Consolidated statement of cash flow . . . . . . . . . . .238  
4
5
. Corporate governance  
6. Consolidated statement of changes  
in shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .239  
1
. Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code) . .100  
7. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements . .240  
(
2. Statutory auditor’s report (article L. 225-235  
of the French Commercial Code) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131  
. General Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .132  
. Statutory auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133  
. Share ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134  
11. Supplemental oil and gas information  
unaudited)  
3
4
5
(
1. Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB  
Accounting Standards Codification 932 . . . . . . . . .330  
2
. Other information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .346  
6
. Compensation for the administration  
and management bodies  
1
2. TOTAL S.A.  
1. Board members’ compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .138  
2. Compensation of the executive directors . . . . . . . .140  
3. Executive officers’ compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . .146  
4. Stock options and performance share grants policy 147  
5. Summary table of compensation elements due or . . .  
granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer .159  
1
2
3
4
. Statutory auditor’s report on regulated  
agreements and commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .350  
. Statutory auditor’s report on  
the annual financial statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .352  
. Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A.  
as parent company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .353  
. Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .357  
7. Social and environmental  
information  
5. Other financial information concerning  
the parent company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .371  
1. Social information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .166  
2. Safety, health and environment information . . . . . .172  
3. Community development information . . . . . . . . . . .180  
Glossary  
375  
379  
Cross reference lists  
Registration Document 2013  
including the annual financial report  
This translation is a non binding translation into English of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s certification issued in French  
and is provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking readers.  
“I certify, after having taken all reasonable measures to this purpose and to the best of my knowledge, that the information contained  
in this Document de référence (Registration Document) is in accordance with the facts and makes no omission likely to affect its import.  
I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the statutory and consolidated financial statements of TOTAL S.A. (the Company) have been prepared  
in accordance with applicable accounting standards and give a fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and results of the Company  
and of all the entities taken as a whole included in the consolidation, and that the rapport de gestion (Management Report) of the Board  
of Directors as referenced in the cross reference list included on page 383 of this Document de référence (Registration Document) presents  
a fair view of the development and performance of the business and financial position of the Company and of all the entities taken as a whole  
included in the consolidation, as well as a description of the main risks and uncertainties they are exposed to.  
I have received a completion letter from the statutory auditors in which they state that they have audited the information related to  
the financial situation and the financial statements included in this Document de référence (Registration Document), as well as read  
this Document de référence (Registration Document) in its entirety.  
The statutory auditors have reviewed the historical financial information contained in this Document de référence (Registration Document).  
The statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, is included on page 234  
of this Document de référence (Registration Document) and contains a remark.  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
The French language version of this Document de référence (Registration Document) was filed with the French Financial Markets Authority  
(Autorité des marchés financiers) on March 27, 2014 pursuant to Article 212-13 of its general regulations. It may be used in connection  
with a financial operation if supplemented by a prospectus which will have received the visa of the French Financial Markets Authority.  
This document has been drawn up by the issuer and is binding for its signatories.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
i
Abbreviations  
b:  
cf:  
barrel  
cubic feet  
per day  
per year  
euro  
/
/
d:  
y:  
:  
$
t:  
and/or dollar: U.S. dollar  
metric ton  
boe:  
kboe/d:  
kb/d:  
Btu:  
barrel of oil equivalent  
thousand boe/d  
thousand barrel/d  
British thermal unit  
M:  
million  
B:  
billion  
megawatt  
megawatt peak (direct current)  
terawatt hour  
French Financial Markets Authority  
American Petroleum Institute  
MW:  
MWp:  
TWh:  
AMF:  
API:  
Conversion table  
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
boe = 1 barrel of crude oil = approx. 5,403 cf of gas* in 2013.  
b/d = approx. 50 t/y  
t = approx. 7.5 b (for a gravity of 37° API)  
ERMI:  
European Refining Margin Indicator. ERMI is an indicator intended to  
represent the margin after variable costs for a hypothetical complex  
refinery located around Rotterdam in Northern Europe. The indicator  
margin may not be representative of the actual margins achieved by  
TOTAL in any period because of TOTAL’s particular refinery configurations,  
product mix effects or other company-specific operating conditions.  
Front-End Engineering and Design  
Floating Production Storage and Offloading  
International Financial Reporting Standards  
liquefied natural gas  
liquefied petroleum gas  
Return on Equity  
Return on Average Capital Employed  
United States Securities and Exchange Commission  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage  
3
Bm /y = approx. 0.1 Bcf/d  
3
m
= approx. 35.3 cf  
t of LNG = approx. 48 kcf of gas  
Mt/y of LNG = approx. 131 Mcf/d  
* This ratio is calculated based on the actual average equivalent energy content  
of TOTAL's natural gas reserves and is subject to change.  
FEED:  
FPSO:  
IFRS:  
LNG:  
LPG:  
ROE  
ROACE:  
SEC:  
SAGD:  
Definitions  
The terms “TOTAL” and “Group” as used in this Registration Document refer to TOTAL  
S.A. collectively with all of its direct and indirect consolidated subsidiaries located in,  
or outside of France.  
© TOTAL S.A. March 2014  
ii  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Key figures  
1
Key figures  
1. Operating and market data  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Brent ($/b)  
Exchange rate (-$)  
European Refinery Margin Indicator (ERMI) ($/t)  
108.7  
1.33  
17.9  
111.7  
1.28  
36.0  
111.3  
1.39  
17.4  
Hydrocarbon production (kboe/d)  
Liquids (kb/d)  
Gas (Mcf/d)  
2,299  
1,167  
6,184  
2,300  
1,220  
5,880  
2,346  
1,226  
6,098  
Refinery throughput (kb/d)  
Refined products sales (kb/d)(a)  
1,719  
3,418  
1,786  
3,403  
1,863  
3,639  
(a) Includes Trading.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
1
Fey figures  
1
Selected financial information  
2. Selected financial information  
Consolidated data in million euros, except for earnings per share, dividends, number of shares and percentages.  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Sales  
189,542  
200,061  
184,693  
Adjusted operating income from business segments(a)  
Adjusted net operating income from business segments(a)  
20,779  
11,925  
24,866  
13,351  
24,456  
12,295  
Net income (Group share)  
Adjusted net income (Group share)(a)  
8,440  
10,745  
10,609  
12,276  
12,309  
11,457  
Fully-diluted weighted-average shares (millions)  
Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share (euros)(a) (b)  
Dividend per share (euros)(c)  
2,272  
4.73  
2.38  
2,267  
5.42  
2.34  
2,257  
5.08  
2.28  
Net-debt-to-equity ratio (as of December 31)  
Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE)(d)  
Return on Equity (ROE)  
23%  
13%  
15%  
22%  
16%  
18%  
23%  
16%  
19%  
Cash flow from operations  
Investments(e)  
Divestments  
21,473  
25,922  
4,814  
22,462  
22,943  
5,871  
19,536  
24,541  
8,578  
(a) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
(b) Based on fully-diluted weighted-average number of common shares oustanding during the period.  
(c) Dividend 2013 is subject to approval at the May 16, 2014 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.  
(d) Based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed at replacement cost.  
(e) Including acquisitions.  
2
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Fey figures  
Selected financial information  
1
Sales  
Adjusted net income  
(
Group share)(  
a)  
200,061  
12,276  
1
89,542  
184,693  
1
1,457  
10,745  
(M)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
(M)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Adjusted net operating income  
from business segments  
Adjusted fully-diluted  
(a) (b)  
(a)  
earnings per share  
1
3,351  
5.42  
5
.08  
12,295  
1
1,925  
4.73  
1
1,145  
1
0,631  
9,370  
Upstream  
Refining  
&
Chemicals  
8
822  
42  
1,376  
830  
1,404  
1,151  
Marketing  
&
Services  
(
M)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Investments(e)  
Dividend per share  
2
5,922  
24,541  
22,943  
2.38(c)  
2.34  
2
.28  
2011  
2012  
2013  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
3
Fey figures  
1
Selected financial information  
Upstream  
Oil and gas production  
Liquids and gas reserves  
11,526  
2,346  
11,423  
11,368  
2,300  
2,299  
5
6
12  
427  
3
92  
5
,413  
5
,784  
5,686  
59  
713  
670  
239  
Europe  
2
5
55  
70  
251  
493  
Africa  
5
36  
6,113  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia and CIS  
5,639  
5,682  
Liquids  
Gas  
462  
3
50  
416  
(
kboe/d)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
(Mboe)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services  
Refined product sales  
Refining capacity at year-end  
including Trading  
3,639  
3
,403  
3,418  
2,096  
2,048  
2,042  
2
1
,281  
2
,018  
1,975  
1,443  
1
,787  
1,742  
1,736  
306  
Europe  
Europe  
,358  
1,385  
Rest of  
World  
Rest of  
World  
3
09  
306  
(
kb/d)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
(kb/d)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Petrochemicals production  
capacity by geographic area  
at year end  
Marketing & Services  
refined products sales  
by geographic area in 2013  
Europe  
Europe  
10,899 Kt  
1,138 Kb/d  
Rest of World  
Rest of World  
9,166 Kt  
611 Kb/d  
2
0,065 Kt  
1,749 Kb/d  
(Kb/d)  
(Kt)  
2013  
2013  
4
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Fey figures  
Selected financial information  
1
Shareholder base  
Shareholder base by region  
Estimates as of December 31, 2013, excluding  
treasury shares, based on the survey of identifiable  
holders of bearer shares (TPI) conducted on that date.  
Estimates as of December 31, 2013, excluding  
treasury shares, based on the survey of identifiable  
holders of bearer shares (TPI) conducted on that date.  
Group  
Employees 4.9%  
France 28.3%  
(
a)  
United Kingdom 10.7%  
Individual  
shareholders 8.1%  
Rest of  
Europe 20.7%  
Institutional  
shareholders 87.0%  
North  
America 30.9%  
Rest of World 9.4%  
(
%)  
2013  
(%)  
2013  
(
a) Based on the definition of employee shareholding pursuant  
to Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code.  
Employees by region(a)  
Employees by business  
segment(  
a)  
Refining-Chemicals 51.5%  
Trading-Shipping 0.6%  
France 33.6%  
Marketing  
&
Services 21.5%  
Rest of Europe  
New Energies 6.7%  
23.4%  
Exploration &  
Production 17.1%  
Rest of World  
3.0%  
4
Gas & Power 1.1%  
Corporate 1.5%  
(
%)  
2013  
(
%)  
2013  
(a) Consolidated companies.  
(
a) Consolidated companies.  
Workforce as of December 31, 2013: 98,799 employees.  
Workforce as of December 31, 2013: 98,799 employees.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
5
6
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
2.Présentation des activités  
Business overview  
2
Business overview  
1.  
History and strategy of TOTAL  
8
1
1
.1.  
.2.  
History and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8  
Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8  
2.  
Upstream segment  
9
2
2
.1.  
.2.  
Exploration & Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11  
Gas & Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35  
3.  
Refining & Chemicals segment  
39  
3
3
.1.  
.2.  
Refining & Chemicals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40  
Trading & Shipping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .45  
4.  
Marketing & Services segment  
48  
4
4
.1.  
.2.  
Marketing & Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49  
New Energies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51  
5.  
Investments  
53  
5
5
.1.  
.2.  
Major investments over the 2011-2013 period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53  
Major investments anticipated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53  
6.  
Organizational structure  
54  
6
6
.1.  
.2.  
Position of the Company within the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54  
Company subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54  
7
.
.
Property, plant and equipment  
55  
56  
8
Organization chart as of December 31, 2013  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
7
Business overview  
2
History and strategy of TOTAL  
1. History and strategy of TOTAL  
1.1. History and development  
TOTAL S.A., a French société anonyme (limited company)  
incorporated on March 28, 1924, together with its subsidiaries  
and affiliates, is the fifth largest publicly-traded integrated  
TOTAL began its Upstream operations in the Middle East in 1924.  
Since that time, the Company has grown and expanded its  
operations worldwide. In early 1999, the Company acquired control  
of PetroFina S.A. (hereafter referred to as “PetroFina” or “Fina”) and  
in early 2000, the Company acquired control of Elf Aquitaine S.A.  
international oil and gas company in the world (1)  
.
With operations in more than 130 countries, TOTAL has activities  
in every sector of the oil industry: including in the upstream (oil and  
gas exploration, development and production, liquefied natural gas)  
and downstream (refining, petrochemicals, specialty chemicals,  
the trading and shipping of crude oil and petroleum products,  
marketing). In addition, TOTAL operates in the power generation  
and renewable energy sectors and has equity stakes in coal mines.  
(hereafter referred to as “Elf Aquitaine” or “Elf”).  
The Company’s Corporate name is TOTAL S.A.  
The Company’s registered office is 2, place Jean Millier,  
La Défense 6, 92400 Courbevoie, France.  
The telephone number is +33 1 47 44 45 46 and the website  
address is total.com.  
TOTAL S.A. is registered in France at the Nanterre Trade Register  
under the registration number 542 051 180.  
1.2. Strategy  
TOTAL’s activities lie at the heart of the two biggest challenges  
facing the world now and in future: energy supply and  
environmental protection. The Group’s responsibility as  
an energy producer is to provide optimum management  
of these twin imperatives.  
– progressively expanding energy solutions and developing new  
energies to complement oil and gas;  
adapting its refining and petrochemical base to market changes,  
focusing on a small number of large, competitive platforms and  
maximizing the advantages of integration;  
TOTAL’s strategy, the implementation of which is based on a model  
for sustainable growth combining the acceptability of operations  
with a profitable investment program, aims at:  
developing its petroleum product marketing business, in  
particular in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, while maintaining  
the competitiveness of its operations in mature areas; and  
expanding hydrocarbon exploration and production activities and  
strengthening its worldwide position as one of the global leaders  
in the natural gas and LNG markets;  
pursuing research and development to develop “clean” sources  
of energy, contributing to the moderation of the demand for  
energy, and participating in the effort against climate change.  
(1) Based on market capitalization (in dollars) as of December 31, 2013.  
8
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2. Upstream segment  
TOTAL’s Upstream segment includes the activities of Exploration & Production and Gas & Power. The Group has exploration and production  
activities in more than fifty countries and produces oil or gas in approximately thirty countries. Gas & Power conducts activities downstream  
from production related to natural gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), as well as power generation and  
trading, and other activities. Effective July 1, 2012, the Upstream segment no longer includes the activities of New Energies, which are  
now reported with Marketing & Services. As a result, certain information has been restated according to the new organization.  
2
.3 Mboe/d  
11.5 Bboe  
of proved reserves as  
of December 31, 2013(  
22.4billion 18,054  
Capital expenditure employees  
for 2013  
of hydrocarbons  
produced in 2013  
1)  
Upstream segment financial data  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non-Group sales  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
19,855  
17,854  
9,370  
22,143  
22,056  
11,145  
22,211  
22,648  
10,631  
(a) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
Adjusted net operating income from the Upstream segment in 2013 was 9,370 million compared to 11,145 million in 2012, a decrease  
of 16%. Expressed in dollars, adjusted net operating income from the Upstream segment was 12.4 B$, a decrease of 13%, mainly due  
to a less favorable production mix, higher technical costs, particularly for exploration, and a higher tax rate for the Upstream segment.  
The effective tax rate for the Upstream segment was 60.1% in 2013 compared to 58.4% in 2012.  
Technical costs(2) for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with ASC 932 , were 26.1 $/boe in 2013, compared with 22.8 $/boe(4) in 2012.  
(3)  
(5)  
The Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE ) for the Upstream segment was 14% in 2013 compared with 18% in 2012.  
Price realizations(a)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Average liquids price ($/b)  
Average gas price ($/Mbtu)  
103.3  
7.12  
107.7  
6.74  
105.0  
6.53  
(a) Consolidated subsidiaries, excluding fixed margins. Effective first quarter 2012, included over/under-lifting valued at market prices.  
TOTAL’s average liquids price decreased by 4% in 2013 compared to 2012 and average gas price increased by 6% in 2013 compared to 2012.  
(
(
(
(
1) Based on a Brent crude price of $108.02/b.  
2) (Production costs + exploration expenses + depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances)/production of the year.  
3) FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932, Extractive industries – Oil and Gas.  
4) Excluding IAS 36 (impairment of assets).  
5) Calculated based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed, using replacement cost.  
(
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
9
 
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
Production  
Hydrocarbon production  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Combined production (kboe/d)  
Liquids (kb/d)  
Gas (Mcf/d)  
2,299  
1,167  
6,184  
2,300  
1,220  
5,880  
2,346  
1,226  
6,098  
Africa 670 kboe/d  
Hydrocarbon production was 2,299 kboe/d in 2013, stable  
compared to 2012, essentially as a result of:  
Middle East 536 kboe/d  
+2.5% for start-ups and ramp-ups from new projects;  
Europe 392 kboe/d  
Asia - Pacific 235 kboe/d  
CIS 227 kboe/d  
-1% for normal decline, partially offset by lower maintenance,  
the restart of production from Elgin/Franklin in the UK North Sea  
and OML 58 in Nigeria;  
-0.5% for portfolio changes, including mainly the sale of interests  
in Nigeria, the UK, Colombia, and Trinidad & Tobago, net of higher  
production corresponding to the increased stake in Novatek; and  
-1% for security issues in Nigeria and Libya, partially offset by  
improved security conditions in Yemen.  
South America 166 kboe/d  
North America 73 kboe/d  
Reserves  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2011  
2010  
Hydrocarbon reserves (Mboe)  
Liquids (Mb)  
11,526  
5,413  
11,368  
5,686  
11,423  
5,784  
Gas (Bcf)  
33,026  
30,877  
30,717  
Asia - CIS 3,497 Mboe  
Africa 2,676 Mboe  
Proved reserves based on SEC rules (based on Brent at 108.02$/b)  
were 11,526 Mboe at December 31, 2013. Based on the 2013  
average rate of production, the reserve life is more than thirteen  
years. The 2013 proved reserve replacement rate , based on SEC  
rules, was 119%. The 2013 organic proved reserve replacement  
rate(2) was 109% in a constant price environment. At year-end  
2013, TOTAL had a solid and diversified portfolio of proved and  
(1)  
Americas 2,072 Mboe  
Middle East 1,739 Mboe  
Europe 1,542 Mboe  
probable reserves(3) representing more than twenty years of reserve  
life based on the 2013 average production rate, and resources(4)  
representing about fifty years of production.  
(
(
(
1) Change in reserves excluding production (revisions + discoveries, extensions + acquisitions – divestments)/production for the period.  
2) The reserve replacement rate would be 100% in constant environment of 111.13 $/b oil price (reference price in 2012), excluding acquisitions and divestments.  
3) Limited to proved and probable reserves covered by Exploration & Production contracts on fields that have been drilled and for which technical studies have demonstrated economic  
development in a 100 $/b Brent environment, including projects developed by mining.  
4) Proved and probable reserves plus contingent resources (potential average recoverable reserves from known accumulations – Society of Petroleum Engineers – 03/07).  
(
10  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2.1. Exploration & Production  
2.1.1. Exploration and development  
2.1.2. Reserves  
TOTAL’s Upstream segment aims at continuing to combine  
long-term growth and profitability at the level of the best  
actors of the industry.  
The definitions used for proved, proved developed and proved  
undeveloped oil and gas reserves are in accordance with the United  
States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 4-10 of  
Regulation S-X as amended by the SEC Modernization of Oil and  
Gas Reporting release issued on December 31, 2008. Proved  
reserves are estimated using geological and engineering data to  
determine with reasonable certainty whether the crude oil or natural  
gas in known reservoirs is recoverable under existing regulatory,  
economic and operating conditions.  
TOTAL evaluates exploration opportunities based on a variety of  
geological, technical, political, economic (including taxes and  
license terms), environmental and societal factors and on projected  
oil and gas prices. Discoveries of new fields and extensions of  
existing fields have brought an additional 2,260 Mboe to the  
Upstream segment’s proved reserves during the 3-year period  
ended December 31, 2013 (before deducting production and sales  
of reserves in place and adding any acquisitions of reserves in  
place during this period). The level of revisions during this 3-year  
period is close to nil (-11 Mboe) since the positive revisions on  
a large majority of the fields have been significantly impacted by  
the effects of the increase of the reference oil price (from $79.02/b  
in 2010 to $108.02/b in 2013 for Brent crude), the variations of the  
U.S. onshore gas price (from $4.38/MBtu in 2010 to $4.21/MBtu in  
TOTAL’s oil and gas reserves are consolidated annually,  
taking into account, among other factors, levels of production,  
field reassessments, additional reserves from discoveries and  
acquisitions, disposal of reserves and other economic factors.  
Unless otherwise indicated, any reference to TOTAL’s proved  
reserves, proved developed reserves, proved undeveloped reserves  
and production reflects the Group’s entire share of such reserves  
or such production. TOTAL’s worldwide proved reserves include  
the proved reserves of its consolidated subsidiaries as well as its  
proportionate share of the proved reserves of equity affiliates.  
For further information concerning changes in TOTAL’s proved  
reserves for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,  
see “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)” in  
Chapter 11.  
2011, $2.85/MBtu in 2012 and $3.67/MBtu in 2013 for Henry Hub)  
and by a perimeter change in four projects.  
In 2013, the exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries  
amounted to 2,809 million (including exploration bonuses included  
in the unproved property acquisition costs). Exploration investments  
were made primarily in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia,  
Norway, Iraq, French Guiana, Angola, Kenya, Côte d’Ivoire and  
Mauritania. In 2012, the exploration investments of consolidated  
subsidiaries amounted to 2,634 million (including exploration  
bonuses included in the unproved property acquisition costs).  
The main exploration investments were made in Angola,  
the United Kingdom, the United States, Norway, Iraq, Nigeria,  
Brazil, Malaysia, the Republic of Congo and French Guiana.  
In 2011, the exploration investments of consolidated subsidiaries  
amounted to 1,629 million (including exploration bonuses  
included in the unproved property acquisition costs) notably  
in Norway, the United Kingdom, Angola, Brazil, Azerbaijan,  
Indonesia, Brunei, Kenya, French Guiana and Nigeria.  
The reserves estimation process involves making subjective  
judgments. Consequently, estimates of reserves are not exact  
measurements and are subject to revision under well-established  
control procedures.  
The reserves booking process requires, among other things:  
– internal peer reviews of technical evaluations to ensure that the  
SEC definitions and guidance are followed; and  
that management makes significant funding commitments  
towards the development of the reserves prior to booking.  
For further information regarding the preparation of reserves  
estimates, see “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited)”  
in Chapter 11.  
The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production subsidiaries’  
development investments amounted to 16 billion in 2013,  
primarily in Norway, Angola, Australia, Nigeria, Canada, United  
Kingdom, the Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Indonesia, Russia,  
the United States and Kazakhstan. The Group’s consolidated  
Exploration & Production subsidiaries’ development investments  
amounted to 14 billion in 2012, primarily in Angola, Norway,  
Canada, Australia, Nigeria, the United Kingdom, Gabon,  
2.1.3. Proved reserves for years 2013,  
2012 and 2011  
In accordance with the amended Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X,  
proved reserves at December 31, are calculated using a 12-month  
average price determined as the unweighted arithmetic average of  
the first-day-of-the-month price for each month of the relevant year  
unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding  
escalations based upon future conditions. The reference prices for  
Kazakhstan, Indonesia, the Republic of the Congo, the United  
States and Russia. The Group’s consolidated Exploration & Production  
subsidiaries’ development investments amounted to 10 billion in  
2011, mostly in Angola, Nigeria, Norway, Kazakhstan, the United  
2013, 2012 and 2011 were, respectively, $108.02/b, $111.13/b  
Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Gabon, Indonesia, the Republic of the  
Congo, the United States and Thailand.  
and $110.96/b for Brent crude.  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves  
of oil and gas were 11 526 Mboe (49% of which were proved  
developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates natural gas  
liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 47% of these  
reserves and natural gas the remaining 53%. These reserves were  
located in Europe (mainly in Norway and the United Kingdom),  
in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Nigeria and the Republic  
of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, Argentina and  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
11  
 
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab  
Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Australia, Kazakhstan  
and Russia).  
2.1.5. Production  
For the full year 2013, average daily oil and gas production was  
2,299 kboe/d compared to 2,300 kboe/d in 2012 and 2,346 kboe/d  
As of December 31, 2012, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves  
of oil and gas were 11,368 Mboe (51% of which were proved  
developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates, natural gas  
liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 50% of these  
reserves and natural gas the remaining 50%. These reserves were  
located in Europe (mainly in Norway and the United Kingdom),  
in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic  
of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, Argentina and  
Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in Qatar, the United Arab  
Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in Australia, Kazakhstan  
and Russia).  
in 2011. Liquids accounted for approximately 51% and natural gas  
for approximately 49% of TOTAL’s combined liquids and natural gas  
production in 2013.  
The table on the next page sets forth by geographic area TOTAL’s  
average daily production of liquids and natural gas for each of the  
last three years.  
Consistent with industry practice, TOTAL often holds a percentage  
interest in its fields rather than a 100% interest, with the balance  
being held by joint venture partners (which may include other  
international oil companies, state-owned oil companies or  
government entities). TOTAL frequently acts as operator (the party  
responsible for technical production) on acreage in which it holds  
an interest. See the table “Presentation of production activities by  
geographic area” on the following pages for a description of  
TOTAL’s producing assets.  
As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL’s combined proved reserves  
of oil and gas were 11,423 Mboe (53% of which were proved  
developed reserves). Liquids (crude oil, condensates natural gas  
liquids and bitumen) represented approximately 51% of these  
reserves and natural gas the remaining 49%. These reserves were  
located in Europe (mainly in Italy, Norway and the United Kingdom),  
in Africa (mainly in Angola, Gabon, Libya, Nigeria and the Republic  
of the Congo), in the Americas (mainly in Canada, the United  
States, Argentina and Venezuela), in the Middle East (mainly in  
Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen), and in Asia (mainly in  
Australia, Indonesia, Kazakhstan and Russia).  
As in 2012 and 2011, substantially all of the liquids production  
from TOTAL’s Upstream segment in 2013 was marketed by the  
Trading & Shipping division of TOTAL’s Refining & Chemicals  
segment (see table “Trading’s crude oil sales and supply and refined  
products sales” on paragraph 3.2.1. of the present Chapter).  
The majority of TOTAL’s natural gas production is sold under long  
term contracts. However, its North American production, and part  
of its production from the United Kingdom, Norway and Argentina,  
is sold on the spot market. The long-term contracts under which  
TOTAL sells its natural gas usually provide for a price related to,  
among other factors, average crude oil and other petroleum  
product prices, as well as, in some cases, a cost-of-living index.  
Though the price of natural gas tends to fluctuate in line with crude  
oil prices, a slight delay may occur before changes in crude oil  
prices are reflected in long-term natural gas prices. Due to the  
interaction between the contract price of natural gas and crude  
oil prices, contract prices are not usually affected by short-term  
market fluctuations in the spot price of natural gas.  
2
.1.4. Sensitivity to oil and gas prices  
Changes in the price used as a reference for the proved reserves  
estimation result in non-proportionate inverse changes in proved  
reserves associated with production sharing and risked service  
contracts (which together represent approximately 25% of TOTAL’s  
reserves as of December 31, 2013). Under such contracts, TOTAL  
is entitled to a portion of the production, the sale of which is  
meant to cover expenses incurred by the Group. As oil prices  
increase, fewer barrels are necessary to cover the same amount  
of expenses. Moreover, the number of barrels retrievable under  
these contracts may vary according to criteria such as cumulative  
production, the rate of return on investment or the income-cumulative  
expenses ratio. This decrease is partly offset by an extension  
of the duration over which fields can be produced economically.  
However, the increase in reserves due to extended field life resulting  
from higher prices is generally less than the decrease in reserves  
under production sharing or risked service contracts due to such  
higher prices. As a result, higher prices lead to a decrease in  
TOTAL’s reserves.  
Some of TOTAL’s long-term contracts, notably in Argentina,  
Indonesia, Nigeria, Norway, Qatar and Russia, specify the delivery  
of quantities of natural gas that may or may not be fixed and  
determinable. Such delivery commitments vary substantially,  
both in duration and in scope, from contract to contract throughout  
the world. For example, in some cases, contracts require delivery  
of natural gas on an as-needed basis, and, in other cases,  
contracts call for the delivery of varied amounts of natural gas over  
different periods of time. Nevertheless, TOTAL estimates the fixed  
and determinable quantity of gas to be delivered over the period  
Furthermore, changes in the price used as a reference for the  
proved reserves estimation have an impact on the volume of  
royalties in Canada and thus TOTAL’s share of proved reserves.  
2014-2016 to be 3,795 Bcf. The Group expects to satisfy most  
of these obligations through the production of its proved reserves  
of natural gas, with, if needed, additional sourcing from spot market  
purchases (see Chapter 11, “Supplemental Oil and Gas Information  
(Unaudited)” of this Registration Document).  
Lastly, for any type of contract, a decrease of the reference price  
of petroleum products may involve a significant reduction  
of proved reserves.  
12  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2.1.6. Production by region  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Liquids  
kb/d  
Natural  
gas  
Mcf/d  
Total  
kboe/d  
Liquids  
kb/d  
Natural  
Total  
kboe/d  
Liquids  
kb/d  
Natural  
gas  
Mcf/d  
Total  
kboe/d  
gas  
Mcf/d  
Africa  
Algeria  
Angola  
Cameroon  
Gabon  
Libya  
Nigeria  
The Congo, Republic of  
531  
5
175  
-
55  
50  
158  
88  
699  
82  
62  
-
16  
-
670  
21  
186  
-
59  
50  
574  
6
172  
-
54  
62  
705  
90  
44  
-
19  
-
713  
23  
179  
-
57  
62  
517  
16  
128  
2
55  
20  
715  
94  
39  
1
17  
-
659  
33  
135  
3
58  
20  
511  
28  
261  
93  
173  
107  
521  
31  
279  
113  
179  
117  
534  
30  
287  
123  
North America  
Canada(a)  
United States  
28  
13  
15  
256  
-
256  
73  
13  
60  
25  
12  
13  
246  
-
246  
69  
12  
57  
27  
11  
16  
227  
-
227  
67  
11  
56  
South America  
Argentina  
Bolivia  
Colombia  
Trinidad & Tobago  
Venezuela  
54  
13  
4
-
2
627  
366  
129  
-
52  
80  
166  
78  
28  
-
12  
48  
59  
12  
3
1
4
682  
394  
124  
23  
70  
71  
182  
83  
27  
6
16  
50  
71  
14  
3
5
4
648  
397  
118  
27  
47  
59  
188  
86  
25  
11  
12  
54  
35  
39  
45  
Asia-Pacific  
Australia  
Brunei  
30  
-
2
1,170  
25  
235  
4
13  
8
27  
-
2
1,089  
29  
221  
5
12  
1
27  
-
2
1,160  
25  
231  
4
13  
-
59  
46  
54  
7
56  
-
China  
-
-
-
Indonesia  
Myanmar  
Thailand  
17  
-
11  
605  
129  
306  
131  
16  
63  
16  
-
9
605  
127  
267  
132  
16  
55  
18  
-
7
757  
119  
203  
158  
15  
41  
CIS  
Azerbaijan  
Russia  
32  
5
27  
1,046  
82  
964  
227  
20  
207  
27  
4
23  
909  
64  
845  
195  
16  
179  
22  
4
18  
525  
57  
468  
119  
14  
105  
Europe  
France  
168  
1
1,231  
45  
392  
9
197  
2
1,259  
58  
427  
13  
245  
5
1,453  
69  
512  
18  
The Netherlands  
Norway  
United Kingdom  
1
136  
30  
195  
575  
416  
35  
243  
105  
1
159  
35  
184  
622  
395  
33  
275  
106  
1
172  
67  
214  
619  
551  
38  
287  
169  
Middle East  
United Arab Emirates  
Iran  
324  
247  
-
1,155  
71  
-
536  
260  
-
311  
233  
-
990  
70  
-
493  
246  
-
317  
226  
-
1,370  
72  
570  
240  
-
-
Iraq  
7
1
7
6
-
6
-
-
-
Oman  
Qatar  
Syria  
Yemen  
24  
36  
-
66  
558  
-
37  
137  
-
24  
38  
-
61  
560  
-
37  
139  
-
24  
44  
11  
12  
62  
36  
155  
53  
86  
616  
218  
402  
10  
459  
95  
10  
299  
65  
Total production  
1,167  
6,184  
2,299  
1,220  
5,880  
2,300  
1,226  
6,098  
2,346  
Including share  
of equity affiliates  
325  
1,955  
687  
308  
1,635  
611  
316  
1,383  
571  
Algeria  
Angola  
Colombia  
Venezuela  
United Arab Emirates  
Oman  
Qatar  
Russia  
Yemen  
-
-
-
-
16  
-
-
3
-
37  
253  
35  
78  
197  
84  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10  
-
4
44  
219  
22  
8
3
-
-
10  
-
4
45  
231  
34  
78  
95  
74  
35  
240  
23  
8
19  
-
7
38  
225  
23  
7
15  
-
7
40  
237  
34  
74  
171  
55  
7
61  
66  
385  
962  
458  
61  
60  
364  
844  
299  
62  
62  
382  
465  
402  
9
-
(a) The Group’s production in Canada consists of bitumen only. All of the Group’s bitumen production is in Canada.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
13  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
2.1.7. Presentation of production activites by region  
The table below sets forth, by country, TOTAL’s producing assets, the year in which TOTAL’s activities commenced, the Group’s interest in  
each asset and whether TOTAL is operator of the asset.  
TOTAL’s producing assets as of December 31, 2013(a)  
Year of entry  
Operated  
Non-operated  
into the country  
(Group share in %)  
(Group share in %)  
Africa  
Algeria  
1952  
1953  
Tin Fouye Tabankort (35.00%)  
Angola  
Gabon  
Girassol, Jasmim, Rosa,  
Dalia, Pazflor (block 17) (40.00%)  
Cabinda Block 0 (10.00%)  
Kuito, BBLT, Tombua-Landana (block 14) (20.00%)(b)  
Angola LNG (13.60%)  
1928  
Anguille (100.00%)  
Anguille Nord Est (100.00%)  
Anguille Sud-Est (100.00%)  
Atora (40.00%)  
Avocette (57.50%)  
Ayol Marine (100.00%)  
Baliste (50.00%)  
Barbier (100.00%)  
Baudroie Marine (50.00%)  
Baudroie Nord Marine (50.00%)  
Coucal (57.50%)  
Girelle (100.00%)  
Gonelle (100.00%)  
Grand Anguille Marine (100.00%)  
Grondin (100.00%)  
Hylia Marine (75.00%)  
Lopez Nord (100.00%)  
Mandaros (100.00%)  
M’Boukou (57.5%)  
M’Boumba (100.00%)  
Mérou Sardine Sud (50.00%)  
Pageau (100.00%)  
Port Gentil Océan (100.00%)  
Port Gentil Sud Marine (100.00%)  
Tchengue (100.00%)  
Torpille (100.00%)  
Torpille Nord Est (100.00%)  
Rabi Kounga (47.50%)  
Libya  
1959  
1962  
Zones 15, 16 & 32 (75.00%)(c)  
Zones 70 & 87 (75.00%)(c)  
Zones 129 & 130 (30.00%)(c)  
Zones 130 & 131 (24.00%)(c)  
Nigeria  
OML 58 (40.00%)  
OML 99 Amenam-Kpono (30.40%)  
OML 100 (40.00%)  
OML 102 (40.00%)  
OML 102-Ekanga (40.00%)  
OML 130 (24.00%)  
OML 138 (20.00%)  
Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC 10.00%)  
OML 118 – Bonga (12.50%)  
14  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
Year of entry  
Operated  
Non-operated  
into the country  
(Group share in %)  
(Group share in %)  
The Congo, Republic of 1928  
Kombi-Likalala-Libondo (65.00%)  
Moho Bilondo (53.50%)  
Nkossa (53.50%)  
Nsoko (53.50%)  
Sendji (55.25%)  
Tchendo (65.00%)  
Tchibeli-Litanzi-Loussima (65.00%)  
Tchibouela (65.00%)  
Yanga (55.25%)  
Loango (50.00%)  
Zatchi (35.00%)  
North America  
Canada  
1999  
1957  
Surmont (50.00%)  
United States  
Several assets in the Barnett Shale area (25.00%)(d)  
Several assets in the Utica Shale area (25.00%)(d)  
Chinook (33.33%)  
Tahiti (17.00%)  
South America  
Argentina  
1978  
Aguada Pichana (27.27%)  
Aguada San Roque (24.71%)  
Aries (37.50%)  
Cañadon Alfa Complex (37.50%)  
Carina (37.50%)  
Hidra (37.50%)  
Kaus (37.5%)  
Sierra Chata (2.51%)  
Bolivia  
1995  
1980  
San Alberto (15.00%)  
San Antonio (15.00%)  
Itau (41.00%)  
Venezuela  
PetroCedeño (30.323%)  
Yucal Placer (69.50%)  
Asia-Pacific  
Australia  
2005  
1986  
2006  
1968  
Various fields in UJV GLNG (27.50%)(e)  
South Sulige (49.00%)  
Brunei  
Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam (37.50%)  
China  
Indonesia  
Bekapai (50.00%)  
Handil (50.00%)  
Peciko (50.00%)  
Sisi-Nubi (47.90%)  
South Mahakam (50.00%)  
Tambora (50.00%)  
Tunu (50.00%)  
Badak (1.05%)  
Nilam-gas and condensates (9.29%)  
Nilam-oil (10.58%)  
Ruby-gas and condensates (15.00%)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
15  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
Year of entry  
Operated  
Non-operated  
into the country  
(Group share in %)  
(Group share in %)  
Myanmar  
Thailand  
1992  
Yadana (31.24%)  
1990  
Bongkot (33.33%)  
Commonwealth of Independant States  
Azerbaijan  
Kazakhstan  
Russia  
1996  
1992  
1991  
Shah Deniz (10.00%)  
Kashagan (16.81%)  
Kharyaga (40.00%)  
Several fields through the participation  
in Novatek (16.96%)  
Europe  
France  
1939  
1965  
Lacq (100.00%)  
Lagrave (100.00%)  
Norway  
Atla (40.00%)  
Skirne (40.00%)  
Åsgard (7.68%)  
Ekofisk (39.90%)  
Ekofisk South (39.90%)  
Eldfisk (39.90%)  
Embla (39.90%)  
Gimle (4.90%)  
Glitne (21.80%)  
Gungne (10.00%)  
Heimdal (16.76%)  
Huldra (24.33%)  
Islay (5.51%)(f)  
Kristin (6.00%)  
Kvitebjørn (5.00%)  
Mikkel (7.65%)  
Morvin (6.00%)  
Oseberg (14.70%)  
Oseberg East (14.70%)  
Oseberg South (14.70%)  
Sleipner East (10.00%)  
Sleipner West (9.41%)  
Snøhvit (18.40%)  
Stjerne (14.70%)  
Tor (48.20%)  
Troll I (3.69%)  
Troll II (3.69%)  
Tune (10.00%)  
Tyrihans (23.145%)  
Vale (24.24%)  
Vilje (24.24%)  
Visund (7.70%)  
Visund South (7.70%)  
Visund North (7.70%)  
Yttergryta (24.50%)  
16  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
Year of entry  
Operated  
Non-operated  
into the country  
(Group share in %)  
(Group share in %)  
The Netherlands  
1964  
F6a gaz (55.66%)  
F6a huile (65.68%)  
F15a Jurassic (38.20%)  
F15a/F15d Triassic (32.47%)  
F15d (32.47%)  
J3a (30.00%)  
K1a (40.10%)  
K1b/K2a (60.00%)  
K2c (60.00%)  
K3b (56.16%)  
K3d (56.16%)  
K4a (50.00%)  
K4b/K5a (36.31%)  
K5b (50.00%)  
K6/L7 (56.16%)  
L1a (60.00%)  
L1d (60.00%)  
L1e (55.66%)  
L1f (55.66%)  
L4a (55.66%)  
L4d (55.66%)  
E16a (16.92%)  
E17a/E17b (14.10%)  
J3b/J6 (25.00%)  
Q16a (6.49%)  
United Kingdom  
1962  
Alwyn North, Dunbar, Forvie North,  
Ellon, Grant, Jura Nuggets (100.00%)  
Elgin-Franklin, West Franklin  
(
EFOG 46.17%)(g)  
Glenelg (49.47%)  
Islay (94.49%)(f)  
Bruce (43.25%)  
Markham unitized fields (7.35%)  
Keith (25.00%)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
17  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
Year of entry  
Operated  
Non-operated  
into the country  
(Group share in %)  
(Group share in %)  
Middle East  
U.A.E.  
1939  
Abu Dhabi-Abu Al Bu Khoosh (75.00%)  
Abu Dhabi offshore (13.33%)(h)  
Abu Dhabi onshore (9.50%)(i)  
GASCO (15.00%)  
ADGAS (5.00%)  
Iraq  
1920  
1937  
Halfaya (18.75%)(j)  
Oman  
Various fields onshore (block 6) (4.00%)(k)  
Mukhaizna field (block 53) (2.00%)(l)  
Qatar  
1936  
1987  
Al Khalij (100.00%)  
North Field-Bloc NF Dolphin (24.50%)  
North Field-Bloc NFB (20.00%)  
North Field-Qatargas 2 Train 5 (16.70%)  
Yemen  
Kharir/Atuf (block 10) (28.57%)  
Various fields onshore (block 5) (15.00%)  
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
a) The Group’s interest in the local entity is approximately 100% in all cases except for Total Gabon (58.28%) and certain entities in Abu Dhabi and Oman (see notes b through l below).  
b) Stake in the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%).  
c) TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.  
d) TOTAL’s interest in the joint venture with Chesapeake.  
e) TOTAL’s interest in the unincorporated joint venture.  
f) The field of Islay extends partially in Norway. TOTAL E&P UK holds a 94.49% and TOTAL E&P Norge 5.51%.  
g) TOTAL holds a 46.17% indirect interest through its interest in EFOG (company 100% owned by TOTAL).  
h) Through ADMA (equity affiliate), TOTAL has a 13.33% interest and participates in the operating company, Abu Dhabi Marine Operating Company.  
i) Through ADPC (equity affiliate), TOTAL has a 9.50% interest and participates in the operating company, Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operation.  
j) TOTAL holds an interest of 18.75% in the consortium.  
k) TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4.00% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in Pohol.  
TOTAL also has a 5.54% interest in the Oman LNG facility (trains 1 and 2), and an indirect participation of 2.04% through OLNG in Qalhat LNG (train 3).  
l) TOTAL holds a direct interest of 2.00% in Block 53.  
(
18  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2
.1.7.1. Africa  
Storage and Offloading unit (FPSO) with a production capacity  
of 160 kbd/d. Production start-up is expected mid-2014.  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Africa was 670 kboe/d,  
representing 29% of the Group’s overall production,  
compared to 713 kboe/d in 2012 and 659 kboe/d in 2011.  
– On the ultra-deep-offshore Block 32 (30%, operator), the basic  
engineering studies for the Kaombo project were completed  
and the final investment decision is expected to be made  
in the first half of 2014. The project will permit the development  
of the discoveries made in the southeast portion of the block  
through two FPSOs with a capacity in excess of 100 kb/d each.  
In South Africa, TOTAL acquired an interest in the 11B-12B license  
(50%, operator) in September 2013. This license, which covers an  
2
area of 19,000 km , is located approximately 175 km south of the  
South African coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 1,800 m.  
The drilling of an exploration well is planned for 2014.  
(1)  
– On Block 14 (20% ), production comes from the Tombua-Landana  
and Kuito fields as well as the BBLT project, comprising the  
Benguela, Belize, Lobito and Tomboco fields.  
In addition, in August 2013, the Group was granted approval by the  
South African authorities to convert its technical cooperation license  
for the Outeniqua Block (100%) into an exploration license, subject  
to the sale by TOTAL of 20% of its stake, when the corresponding  
license agreement will have been negociated and signed. The Outeniqua  
– Block 14K (36.75%) corresponds to the offshore unitization  
zone between Angola (Block 14) and the Republic of Congo  
(Haute Mer license). The development of the Lianzi field, which  
was started in 2012, will be achieved by means of a connection  
to the existing BBLT platform (Block 14). Production start-up  
is planned for 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized block  
is held 10% through Angola Block 14 BV and 26.75% through  
Total E&P Congo.  
2
Block, which covers approximately 76,000 km , is located to the  
southwest of the 11B-12B license in water depths ranging from  
400 m to 4,000 m. A 2D seismic campaign of 7,000 km combined  
with sea bed core drilling activities is expected to be launched.  
In Algeria, TOTAL’s production was 21 kboe/d during 2013,  
compared to 23 kboe/d in 2012 and 33 kboe/d in 2011.  
The decline in production between 2011 and 2012 was mainly  
due to the sale of TOTAL’s interest in CEPSA (48.83%), which was  
completed in July 2011. All of the Group’s production in Algeria  
now comes from the Tin Fouyé Tabenkort (TFT) field (35%). TOTAL  
also has stakes of 37.75% and 47% in the Timimoun and Ahnet  
gas development projects, respectively.  
– On Block 0 (10%), the development of Mafumeira Sul was  
approved by the partners and the authorities in 2012. This  
project constitutes the second phase of the development of  
the Mafumeira field. Production start-up is planned for 2016.  
On Block 15/06 (15%), the development of a first production  
hub, including the discoveries located in the northwest portion of  
the block, began in early 2012. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an  
agreement to sell its entire interest in block 15/06. The closing of  
this transaction is expected during the first half of 2014.  
On the TFT field, plateau production was maintained at 170 kboe/d.  
The development of the Timimoun field continued in 2013 and  
the responses for the main calls for tender (plant construction  
and drilling devices) have been reviewed. In February 2014,  
the main contract was allocated. Commercial gas production  
TOTAL has operations on exploration Blocks 33 (58.67%, operator),  
17/06 (30%, operator), 25 (35%, operator), 39 (15%) and 40 (50%,  
operator). The Group plans to drill pre-salt targets in Blocks 25,  
39 and 40 in 2014 in the deep offshore Kwanza basin. TOTAL  
signed a disposal agreement to reduce its interest in Block 40  
to 40%. The closing of this transaction is expected during the first  
half of 2014.  
could start in 2017, with anticipated plateau production of  
3
1
.6 Bm /year (160 Mcf/d). The 3D seismic survey of an area  
2
of 2,240 km , which started in December 2012, was completed  
in July 2013. The data is currently being analyzed.  
Within the framework of the Ahnet project, discussions are  
continuing between the project partners and the authorities,  
particularly in light of the provisions of the new 13-02 oil  
legislation, which provide greater incentives for the development  
of unconventional hydrocarbons. The anticipated plateau  
TOTAL is also developing its LNG activities through the Angola  
LNG project (13.6%), which includes a gas liquefaction plant near  
Soyo supplied in particular by the gas associated with production  
from Blocks 0, 14, 15, 17 and 18. LNG production started in  
June 2013 but, due to various incidents, the plant has not yet  
reached full capacity (5.2 Mt/y).  
3
production is 4 Bm /year (400 Mcf/d) as of 2018.  
In Angola, the Group’s production in 2013 was 186 kboe/d,  
compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 135 kboe/d in 2011, and  
comes from Blocks 0, 14 and 17. Recent highlights include the  
launch of the CLOV project in 2010, the start-up of production on  
Pazflor in 2011, several discoveries on Blocks 15/06 and 17/06,  
and, finally, the acquisition of interests in exploration Blocks 25,  
In Cameroon, TOTAL no longer holds any exploration or  
production assets since the sale of its subsidiary Total E&P  
Cameroun in 2011. Production was 3 kboe/d in 2011.  
In Côte d’Ivoire, TOTAL is active in four deep offshore exploration  
licenses located 50 km to 100 km from the coast and covering  
2
approximately 5,200 km at water depths ranging from 1,000 m to  
39 and 40 in the Kwanza basin.  
3,000 m.  
Deep-offshore Block 17 (40%, operator) is TOTAL’s principal asset  
in Angola. It is composed of four major hubs: Girassol, Dalia,  
Pazflor, which are all in production, and CLOV, which is currently  
being developed. The Pazflor project, consisting of the Perpetua,  
Zinia, Hortensia and Acacia fields, has achieved plateau production  
TOTAL is the operator of the CI-100 (60%) license in the Tano basin  
and holds stakes in the CI-514 (54%, operator), CI-515 (45%) and  
CI-516 (45%) licenses in the San Pedro basin.  
A comprehensive 3D seismic survey has been conducted on the  
CI-100 license and an first exploration well (Ivoire-1X) was drilled  
in early 2013 in the northwest portion of the block at a water depth  
(220 kb/d). The CLOV project, which was launched in 2010,  
will result in the installation of a fourth Floating Production,  
(1) Interest held by the company Angola Block 14 BV (TOTAL 50.01%, INPEX Corporation 49.99% since February 2013).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
19  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
of more than 2,300 m. This well has encountered a good-quality oil  
horizon. The recorded data is currently undergoing analysis in order  
to assess the potential of the discovered reservoirs and define  
an exploration and additional works program.  
In Libya, the Group’s production in 2013 was 50 kb/d compared  
to 62 kb/d in 2012 and 20 kb/d in 2011. TOTAL is a partner in the  
following contract zones: 15, 16 & 32 (75%(2)), 70 & 87 (75%(2)),  
129 & 130 (30%(2)) and 130 & 131 (24%(2)) and Block NC191  
(
100%(2), operator).  
A 3D seismic survey campaign covering the whole of the three  
licenses CI-514, CI-515 and CI-516 was completed in  
December 2012. The interpretation of the data is on going.  
Following the drilling of a first exploration well on license CI-514,  
two more wells are due to be drilled on licenses CI-515 and CI-516  
during the course of 2014.  
Production which, in 2012, had returned to its level prior  
to the events of 2011 was affected from mid-2013 onward by  
the blockade of most of the country’s terminals and pipelines due  
to social and political unrest.  
In onshore zones 70 and 87 (Mabruk), production has been  
affected since August 2013 due to the blockade of the Es Sider  
export terminal. Development of the Garian field was approved  
in July 2013 and production at the field is expected to start  
in the third quarter 2014.  
In Egypt, TOTAL is the operator of Block 4 (East El Burullus  
Offshore) and reduced its stake in this license from 90% to 50%  
in January 2013. The license, located in the Nile river basin, covers  
a 4-year initial exploration period and includes a commitment to  
carrying out 3D seismic work and drilling exploration wells. Following  
In onshore zones 129, 130 and 131, production was stopped  
in 2013 during several months due to the blocking of the  
production installation and the evacuation pipeline. The seismic  
survey campaign, which was interrupted in 2011 due to force  
majeure, has not yet resumed. However, the exploration of these  
blocks continued in 2013 with the drilling of three wells.  
2
the 3D seismic campaign covering 3,374 km that was conducted  
in 2011, an exploration well (Kala-1) was drilled in late 2013, whose  
results have been disappointing.  
In Gabon, the Group’s production in 2013 was 59 kboe/d  
compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 58 kboe/d in 2011.  
The Group’s exploration and production activities in Gabon are  
mainly carried out by Total Gabon(1), one of the Group’s oldest  
subsidiaries in sub-Saharan Africa.  
In the onshore Murzuk basin, a plan for the development of Block NC  
191 was submitted to the authorities in 2009. Discussions have resu-  
med following the interruptions associated with the events of 2011.  
As part of the Anguille field redevelopment project (estimated  
production capacity of 20 kboe/d), the AGM North platform, from  
which twenty-one additional development wells are expected to  
be drilled, was installed in 2012. Production started as planned  
with two wells in March 2013.  
In offshore zones 15, 16 and 32 (Al Jurf), production has not  
been affected by the social unrest in the country. The drilling of  
two exploration wells scheduled for the second quarter of 2013  
was postponed due to technical reasons. The first of these wells  
was started at the end of 2013.  
On the deep-offshore Diaba license, the operator Total Gabon  
sold off part of its interest in 2012 and now has a stake of  
In Madagascar, TOTAL is active on the Bemolanga 3102 license  
60%, operator). Since the exploitation of oil sand accumulations  
is no longer planned, TOTAL is refocusing on the conventional  
exploration of the block, which is expected to continue in 2014 with  
a 2D seismic survey following the approval of an additional 2-year  
extension of the exploration phase by the local authorities.  
(
4
2
2.5%. An initial exploration well (Diaman-1B) was drilled during  
013 at a water depth of more than 1,700 m. This well revealed  
an accumulation of gas and condensates in the pre-salt  
reservoirs of the Gamba Formation. Data analysis is currently  
underway in order to assess this discovery and reassess the  
surrounding prospects.  
In Morocco, the Anzarane offshore reconnaissance contract  
2
covering an offshore zone of 100,000 km , which was granted  
The Nguongui-updip well was drilled on the Mutamba-Iroru  
license (50%) in 2012 and revealed the presence of hydrocarbons.  
Work is currently being conducted to evaluate the commercial  
viability of this discovery. A 2D seismic survey was conducted  
on the Nziembou license (20%) in 2012. Drilling preparation  
activities are being conducted for a first exploration well  
scheduled in 2014.  
in December 2011 to TOTAL and ONHYM (National Bureau  
of Petroleum and Mines), was extended for one year in  
December 2013. A 3D seismic survey campaign covering  
2
5
,900 km that started in late 2012 was completed in July 2013.  
The collected data is currently being processed.  
In Mauritania, the Group has exploration operations on the Ta7  
and Ta8 licenses (60%, operator) located in the Taoudenni basin.  
In 2012, TOTAL acquired interests in two exploration licenses  
In Kenya, TOTAL acquired a 40% stake in five offshore licenses  
in the Lamu basin in 2011, namely licenses L5, L7, L11a, L11b  
and L12, representing a total surface area of more than 30,600 km2  
at water depths of between 100 m and 3,000 m. Following the 3D  
(90%, operator): Block C9 in ultra-deep offshore, and Block Ta29  
onshore in the Taoudenni basin. During 2013, TOTAL sold 18% of  
its stake in Block Ta29, but retains operatorship and a 72% interest.  
2
seismic survey campaign covering 3,500 km that was conducted  
during the initial exploration period, 25% of the surface area of the  
five blocks was relinquished. In 2013, two exploration wells were  
drilled in Blocks L7 and L11b, but did not result in positive results.  
In 2012, the results Group also acquired the L22 offshore license  
– Following a 2D seismic survey performed in 2011 on license Ta7,  
well Ta7-1 was drilled in 2013. Tests have been conducted,  
but they did not allow to highlight hydrocarbons in commercial  
quantity.  
(
100%, operator), located in the same basin and covering a surface  
2
On Block Ta29, a 900 km seismic was performed in 2012.  
The processing and the interpretation of these seismic data  
have been completed. Studies are underway to identify a  
prospect on this block.  
2
area of more than 10,000 km in water depths ranging from 2,000  
m to 3,500 m. In December 2013, TOTAL sold 30% of its stake in  
this license. A 2D seismic survey and sea core drilling operations  
are planned for 2014 on the L22 offshore license.  
(
1) Total Gabon is a Gabonese company listed on Euronext Paris. The Group holds 58.28%, the Republic of Gabon holds 25% and the public float is 16.72%.  
(2) TOTAL’s stake in the foreign consortium.  
20  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2
A 3D seismic survey campaign covering 4,700 km was  
– On the OML 130 license (24%, operator), the development of the  
Egina field (capacity of 200 kboe/d) was launched in June 2013  
and contracts have been awarded. Production start-up is  
expected at year-end 2017.  
conducted on Block C9 in 2013. The data is currently being  
processed and interpreted.  
In Mozambique, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in the  
production sharing contract regarding offshore Blocks 3 and 6.  
Located in the Rovuma basin, these two blocks cover a total  
surface area of 15,250 km² in water depths ranging from 0 m to  
– On the OML 99 license (40%, operator), engineering work  
is underway to develop the Ikike field, where production is  
expected to start in 2017 (estimated capacity of 55 kboe/d).  
2
,500 m. An exploration well was drilled in 2012 and half of the  
On the OML 112/117 licenses (40%), development studies have  
been suspended waiting for the resolution of contractual issues  
that arose in 2013.  
surface area of the two blocks was relinquished in 2013 at the start  
of the second exploration period.  
In Nigeria, Group production in 2013 was 261 kboe/d compared to  
TOTAL is also active in the LNG sector with a 15% holding in the  
company Nigeria LNG, which possesses a liquefaction plant of a  
total capacity of 22 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL holds a 17% stake  
in Brass LNG, which is continuing to study the project for a gas  
liquefaction plant with two LNG trains of a capacity of 5 Mt/y each.  
279 kboe/d in 2012 and 287 kboe/d in 2011. These declines are  
primarily due to the sharp increase in oil bunkering and in 2013  
the blockade of Nigeria LNG export cargos. Despite such factors  
negatively affecting production, Nigeria remained the main  
contributor to the Group’s production.  
The production that is not operated by the Group in Nigeria comes  
mainly from the SPDC joint venture, in which TOTAL holds a 10%  
stake. The sharp increase of oil bunkering in 2013 had an impact  
on onshore production, as well as on the integrity of the facilities  
and the local environment.  
TOTAL, which has been present in the country since 1962,  
operates six production licenses (OML) out of the thirty-eight in  
which it has a stake, and one out of the four exploration licenses  
(OPL) in which it is present.  
Regarding variations in TOTAL’s licenses:  
In addition, TOTAL also holds a 12.5% stake in the OML 118  
deep-offshore license. In connection with this license, the Bonga  
field contributed 15 kboe/d to Group production in 2013. The  
partners continued the development of the Bonga Northwest  
project in 2013. On the OML 118 license, a pre-unitization  
agreement relating to the Bonga South West discovery has  
been signed in December 2013.  
In September 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the  
authorities to increase its stake in exploration license OPL 285  
from 26.67% to 60%. In May 2013, TOTAL obtained the  
approval of the authorities for the renewal of licenses OML 99,  
100 and 102 for a period of twenty years.  
On the OML 138 license (20%), TOTAL started production in the  
Usan offshore field in 2012 (180 kb/d, FPSO capacity), which  
reached the level of 130 kboe/d in 2013. Since February 2014,  
TOTAL is no longer the operator of the OML 138 license.  
In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement for the sale of its 20%  
stake in Block OML 138. The approval by the authorities has  
not yet been received.  
In Uganda, TOTAL has been active since 2012 and holds a 33.33%  
interest in the EA-1, EA-1A and EA-2 licenses as well as the Kingfisher  
license. All of these licenses are located in the Lake Albert region, where  
oil resources have already been discovered. TOTAL is the operator  
of licenses EA-1 and EA-1A and a partner on the other licenses.  
On the appraisal license EA-1, a campaign of wells, production  
tests and a 3D seismic survey are underway. Five development  
plans will be submitted to the authorities before the end of 2014:  
Ngiri (submitted in December 2013), Jobi-Rii (April 2014), and  
Mpyo, Gunya and Jobi East (December 2014).  
TOTAL decided not to continue its exploration activities in JDZ  
Block 1 (48.6%, operator) following the analysis of the results of  
wells drilled in 2012. Block was relinquished in September 2013.  
Also, the Block OPL 221 was relinquished in November 2013.  
TOTAL sold its 10% stake in Blocks OML 26 and 42 in 2011  
and in Blocks OML 30, 34 and 40 in 2012. These interests  
had previously been indirectly controlled via the joint venture  
Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC).  
– The EA-1A license expired in February 2013, following a campaign  
involving the drilling of five exploration wells that resulted in one  
discovery (Lyec). With the exception of the scope relating to this  
discovery, the license has been returned to the authorities.  
TOTAL continues, with its developments, to meet the growing  
domestic demand for gas and to strengthen its ability to supply  
gas to the LNG projects in which it owns a stake:  
– On the appraisal license EA-2, the campaign of wells and production  
tests started in 2012 continued during 2013. An additional well is  
due to be drilled in 2014. Two development plans were submitted  
to the authorities in June 2013 (Kasamene and Wahrindi fields,  
as well as those of Kigogole, Ngege, Ngara and Nsoga).  
As part of its joint venture with the Nigerian National Petroleum  
Company (NNPC), TOTAL is pursuing the project to increase the  
gas production capacity of the OML 58 license (40%, operator)  
from 370 Mcf/d to 550 Mcf/d.  
– The development plan for the Kingfisher field, which is located  
on the EA-3 production license, was approved by the authorities  
in September 2013. The basic engineering studies are currently  
being prepared.  
On the OML 102 license (40%, operator), TOTAL is continuing to  
develop the Ofon phase 2 project, which was launched in 2011,  
with an expected capacity of 70 kboe/d and production start-up is  
scheduled for the end of 2014. In 2011, the Group also discovered  
Etisong North, located 15 km from the currently-producing Ofon  
field. The exploration campaign continued in 2012 with the drilling  
of the Eben well, which is also south of Ofon. The positive results  
produced by this well further enhance the interest of the future  
Etisong-Eben development hub as a satellite of the Ofon field.  
– The Kanywataba exploration well was drilled in June 2012 with  
negative results. The Kanywataba license expired in August 2012  
and was returned to the authorities.  
At the initiative of the Ugandan government, discussions are  
underway concerning the construction of a refinery that will be  
developed in two phases (30 kb/d in the first phase followed  
by a second phase providing an additional 30 kb/d), as well as  
an export pipeline.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
21  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
In the Republic of Congo, the Group’s production in 2013 was  
2.1.7.2. North America  
9
2
3 kboe/d compared to 113 kboe/d in 2012 and 123 kboe/d in  
011. The decrease in production was due in particular to the end  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in North America was 73 kboe/d,  
representing 3% of the Group’s total production, compared to  
of plateau production at Moho Bilondo in mid-2010 and to a  
planned shut-down on the Nkossa field.  
69 kboe/d in 2012 and 67 kboe/d in 2011.  
In Canada, the Group’s production in 2013 was 13 kboe/d  
compared to 12 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d in 2011. The Group’s  
oil sands portfolio is focused around two main hubs: on the one  
hand, a Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) hub focused on  
continuing developments at Surmont’s (50%), and, on the other, a  
mining hub, which includes the Joslyn (38.25%, operator), Fort Hills  
The development of the Lianzi field was approved in 2012.  
Located in the offshore unitization zone Block 14K (36.75%)  
between Angola and the Republic of Congo (Haute Mer license),  
this field will be developed by a tieback to the existing Benguela-  
Belize-Lobito-Tomboco platform (Block 14 in Angola). Production  
start-up is expected in 2015. TOTAL’s interest in the unitized  
block is held 26.75% through Total E&P Congo and 10% through  
Angola Block 14 BV.  
(39.2%) and Northern Lights (50%, operator) mining projects as  
well as a 100% stake in a number of oil sands leases acquired  
through a series of auction sales.  
The Moho Bilondo offshore field (53.5%, operator) reached  
plateau production of 90 kboe/d in mid-2010. The field has now  
started its decline. The Phase 1b and Moho North projects were  
launched in March 2013 following agreements on the contractual  
and fiscal conditions in 2012. Production start-up is planned for  
On the Surmont lease, additional wells were drilled in 2013 in  
order to optimize production. The decision to construct an  
additional steam generation unit was also made with the same  
aim in mind. The drilling of additional wells is expected to  
continue in 2014.  
2015 and 2016, respectively, with estimated production capacity  
of 140 kboe/d (40 kboe/d for Phase 1b and 100 kboe/d for  
Moho North).  
In early 2010, the partners involved in the project decided to  
launch the construction of the second development phase.  
The goal of production start-up from Surmont Phase 2 has been  
set for 2015 and overall production capacity from the field is  
expected to increase to 130 kboe/d.  
Production at Libondo (65%, operator), which is part of the  
Kombi-Likalala-Libondo operating license, started in 2011.  
Plateau production reached 12 kboe/d in 2011.  
On the Fort Hills project (production capacity estimated at 180 kb/d),  
the final investment decision was made in October 2013.  
Site preparation work is underway and production start-up is  
planned for the end of 2017.  
In July 2013, TOTAL obtained the Haute Mer B license  
(34.62%, operator) in association with other partners.  
As part of the renewal of the Loango and Zatchi licenses, an  
agreement on the related contractual and fiscal conditions was  
signed in October 2013. This agreement is subject to approval  
by the parliament. TOTAL’s interest in these licenses will change  
respectively from 50% to 42.50% for Loango and from 35% to  
On the Joslyn license, engineering studies are currently being  
conducted in order to optimize production from the Joslyn North  
Mine project.  
2
9.75% for Zatchi with a retroactive effect in October 2013.  
– In March 2013, TOTAL concluded an agreement for the sale  
of its 49% stake in the Voyageur upgrader project.  
In December 2013, in connection with a share capital increase  
of Total E&P Congo, Qatar Petroleum International Upstream (QPI)  
entered into the share capital of this subsidiary at a level of 15%.  
In the United States, the Group’s production in 2013 was 60 kboe/d  
compared to 57 kboe/d in 2012 and 56 kboe/d in 2011.  
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, following the  
Presidential decree approving TOTAL’s entry in 2011 as operator  
with a 60% interest in Block III of the Graben Albertine, the  
exploration permit was issued in January 2012 by the Minister  
of Hydrocarbons for a period of three years and subsequently  
extended by an additional year due to the postponement of the  
works in light of the general security situation in the eastern part  
of the country. This block is located in the Lake Albert region.  
TOTAL acquired an additional 6.66% of this block in March 2012.  
The prospecting program is limited to the northern portion of the  
license, which is outside the Virunga park. A helicopter acquisition  
of gravimetric and magnetic data was completed in August 2012  
with encouraging results. The 2D seismic survey campaign  
prepared in 2013 is scheduled to start in 2014.  
In the Gulf of Mexico:  
-
Phase 2 of the deep-offshore Tahiti oil field (17%) was launched  
in 2010. This phase comprises drilling four injection wells and  
two producing wells. The injection of water started in 2012.  
The first producing well was put into operation in late 2013  
and the second producing well, the drilling of which is currently  
being completed, is due to start production in 2014.  
-
-
The Chinook 4 well in the deep-offshore Chinook project  
(33.33%) started production in the third quarter of 2012.  
Drilling of the Chinook 5 well was completed in 2013  
and started production in early 2014.  
The TOTAL (40%) – Cobalt (60%, operator) alliance’s  
exploratory drilling campaign, which was launched in 2009,  
was resumed in 2012 after the U.S. government lifted the  
moratorium on deep-offshore drilling operations. This resulted  
in the drilling of the Ligurian 2 well (dry well) together with the  
North Platte well at which a major oil discovery was made  
and for which studies are currently being conducted. Results  
from the Ardennes well, which was drilled in 2013, gave  
disappointing results, just like the Aegean well, which was  
completed in December 2013. The Aegean well is the last  
one of the drilling campaign.  
In the Republic of South Sudan, TOTAL is negotiating a new  
contract with the state authorities that would make it possible to  
resume exploration activities in part of Block B. Since the  
independence of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011,  
TOTAL is no longer present in Sudan.  
22  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
TOTAL is active in shale gas production in Texas and has a 25%  
stake in the Chesapeake portfolio in the Barnett Shale basin  
through its participation in a joint venture with Chesapeake.  
Given the drop in gas prices in the United States, drilling  
operations have been sharply reduced from 2012 onwards  
– In the Neuquén basin, TOTAL started a drilling campaign  
on its mining licenses in 2011 in order to assess their shale gas  
and oil potential. In 2012 and 2013, this campaign, which started  
on the Aguada Pichana license (27.3%, operator), was extended  
to all the blocks operated by the Group: San Roque (24.7%,  
operator), Rincón la Ceniza and La Escalonada (85%, operator),  
Aguada de Castro (42.5%, operator), and Pampa de las Yeguas  
II (42.5%, operator), as well as to the blocks operated by third  
parties: Cerro Las Minas (40%), Cerro Partido (45%), Rincón de  
Aranda (45%), and Veta Escondida (45%). The first results, all  
positive, of the production tests on the wells drilled during this  
campaign permit envisaging various development scenarios in  
the region. A pilot development intended to test the unconventional  
production potential at the Aguada Pichana Block is expected  
to enter into production in late 2014.  
(approximately sixty wells drilled in 2013 compared to  
100 in 2012 and more than 300 in 2011).  
TOTAL is also active in the production of shale gas in Ohio and  
has a 25% stake in the liquid-rich Utica shale gas play through  
a joint venture with Chesapeake and EnerVest. More than  
200 liquids-rich gas wells were drilled in 2013 (compared to  
approximately 100 in 2012) and approximately 190 of these  
have been connected and started producing (compared to  
forty-seven in 2012).  
Engineers from TOTAL are assigned to the teams led by  
Chesapeake.  
In Bolivia, the Group’s production, primarily gas, was 28 kboe/d  
in 2013 compared to 27 kboe/d in 2012 and 25 kboe/d in 2011.  
TOTAL has stakes in seven licenses: three production licenses,  
San Alberto and San Antonio (15%) and Block XX Tarija Oeste  
(41%), two licenses in the development phase, Aquio and Ipati  
(60%, operator), and two licenses in the exploration or appraisal  
phase, Rio Hondo (50%) and Azero (50%, operator).  
The Group holds a 50% stake in American Shale Oil LLC (AMSO)  
to develop in situ shale oil technology. The first in situ heating  
tests have been performed and are resulting in adaptations to  
the selected technology.  
In 2012, TOTAL entered into a 50/50 association with Red Leaf  
Resources for the ex situ development of oil shale and agreed  
to fund a production pilot before any larger-scale development.  
In addition, TOTAL finalized an agreement to purchase  
– Production started in 2011 on the Itaú gas and condensates  
field located on Block XX Tarija Oeste; it is routed to the existing  
facilities of the neighboring San Alberto field. Phase 2 of the  
development of the field entered into production at the end  
of 2013.  
2
approximately 120 km of additional land in Colorado and Utah,  
with a view to developing in situ shale oil techniques (AMSO  
technique) or ex situ techniques (Red Leaf technique).  
In 2004, TOTAL discovered the Incahuasi gas field on the  
Ipati Block. In 2011 and 2013, two additional wells confirmed  
the extension of the discovery northwards onto the adjacent  
Aquio Block as well as southwards onto the Ipati license.  
In April 2013, TOTAL was granted approval by the authorities  
to start development of Phase 1 of the project, including the  
connection of three existing drilled wells tied to a central  
In Mexico, TOTAL is conducting various studies with state-owned  
PEMEX under a general technical cooperation agreement renewed  
in July 2011 for a period of five years.  
2
.1.7.3. South America  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in South America was 166 kboe/d,  
representing 7% of the Group’s total production, compared to  
82 kboe/d in 2012 and 188 kboe/d in 2011.  
3
processing plant of 6.5 Mm /d. The key contracts relating to the  
construction of the plant and its connection to the export  
network were granted in October 2013. In July 2013, TOTAL  
sold 20% stakes in the Aquio and Ipati fields thereby reducing its  
interest in these fields from 80 to 60%.  
1
In Argentina, where TOTAL has been present since 1978, the  
Group operated about 30%(1) of the country’s production in 2013.  
The Group’s production in 2013 was 78 kboe/d compared to  
In August 2013, TOTAL acquired a 50% stake in the Azero  
exploration license in the Andean Piedmont. This is located  
to the west of the Ipati and Aquio Blocks and covers an area  
of more than 7,800 km2.  
8
3 kboe/d in 2012 and 86 kboe/d in 2011. In order to encourage  
investment in exploration and production, the Argentinean  
government has concluded gas price agreements with various  
producers as of December 2012. Under the terms of these  
agreements, the Argentinean government guarantees the price  
of gas for quantities above a fixed production level in exchange  
for compliance with defined production targets and applicable  
penalties (i.e., “Deliver or Pay”). In February 2013, TOTAL  
signed an agreement of this type for a period of five years  
with retroactive effect from December 1, 2012.  
In Brazil, the Group has stakes in fourteen exploration licenses.  
In October 2013, TOTAL acquired a 20% stake in the Libra field.  
This field is currently being assessed and is the largest pre-salt  
oil field discovered to date in the Santos basin off the coast  
of Brazil. The field is located in very deep water (2,000 m)  
approximately 170 km off the coast of Rio de Janeiro and covers  
2
In Tierra del Fuego, the Group notably operates the Carina and  
Aries offshore fields (37.5%). Following the re-appraisal of the  
reserves of the Carina field, three additional wells are expected  
to be drilled from the existing platform. These wells should allow  
production levels from the facilities operated by the Group in  
Tierra del Fuego to be maintained at about 630 Mcf/d until  
the Vega Pleyade field (37.5%, operator) starts up in 2015.  
Development of this field started in October 2013.  
an area of 1,550 km . Additional exploration works including  
contractual obligations to be realized by the end of 2017 and  
appraisal and development studies of the field were launched.  
Following the eleventh call for tender organized by the Brazilian  
authorities in May 2013, TOTAL acquired a stake in ten new  
operating licenses. Holding a 40% stake, the Group operates  
five blocks (FZA-M-57, FZA-M-86, FZA-M-88, FZA-M-125 and  
FZA-M-127) located in the Foz do Amazonas basin and has a  
(1) Source: Argentinean Ministry of Federal Planning, Public Investment and Services – Energy Secretary.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
23  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
4
5% interest in a block (CE-M-661) located in the Ceara basin.  
– In October 2013, TOTAL signed two exploration and production  
contracts for Blocks B1 and B2 for unconventional plays.  
These two blocks, which cover a total area of 5,200 km , are  
primarily located in the Artigas province in the northwestern part  
of the country. The commitments undertaken in respect of these  
licenses relate to the conduct of geological, geochemical and  
environmental studies.  
TOTAL also has a 25% stake in three blocks (ES-M-669,  
ES-M-671 and ES-M-743) located in the Espirito Santo basin  
and a 50% share in another block (BAR-M-346) located in  
the Barreirinhas basin.  
2
TOTAL also has a stake in the Xerelete field, which the Group  
has operated since 2012. This stake is primarily located on Block  
BC-2 (41.2%) and extends into Block BM-C-14 (50%). The drilling  
of a well targeting pre-salt horizons was launched at the beginning  
of January 2014.  
– In 2012, TOTAL acquired a stake in Block 14, which is located  
approximately 250 km offshore in water depths ranging from  
2,000 m to 3,500 m and covers an area of some 6,700 km².  
In particular, TOTAL agreed to conduct a 3D seismic survey of  
the entire block, which was completed in early 2014.  
The Group has also agreed to drill one well in the first 3-year  
exploration phase.  
A well was drilled in 2012 in the Gato Do Mato field, which is  
located in Block BM-S-54 (20%) and was discovered in the  
Santos basin in 2010. The encouraging results are currently  
being analyzed in order to define the next stages in the  
assessment of the field.  
In Venezuela, where TOTAL has had operations since 1980, the  
Group’s production was 48 kboe/d in 2013 compared to 50 kboe/d  
in 2012 and 54 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has equity stakes in  
In Colombia, TOTAL no longer has production since the sale in  
012 of one of its subsidiaries, TEPMA BV, which held a stake in  
2
PetroCedeño (30.3%), which produces and upgrades extra heavy  
oil in the Orinoco Belt, in Yucal Placer (69.5%), which produces gas  
dedicated to the domestic market, and in the offshore exploration  
Block 4, located in Plataforma Deltana (49%). The development  
phase of the southern zone of the PetroCedeño field, which started  
in 2011, is continuing with forty-three producing wells having been  
drilled at the end of 2013. The postponement of a debottlenecking  
project in addition with a performance study performed on the field  
in 2013 led to a revision of PetroCedeño’s reserves. Pursuant to an  
amendment to the gas sale contract, a new development phase  
of the Yucal Placer field, which is expected to boost the production  
capacity from 100 Mcf/d to 300 Mcf/d, was launched in June 2012.  
the Cusiana field. Production was 6 kboe/d in 2012 and 11 kboe/d  
in 2011.  
Following the discovery of Huron-1 on the Niscota (50%) license  
in 2009 and the drilling of the second well, Huron-2, which yielded  
positive test results in April 2013, a third well, Huron-3, was drilled  
with disappointing results. The conceptual development studies  
have started for a declaration of commerciality that is expected  
during the second quarter of 2014.  
After selling 10% of its stake in the Ocensa pipeline in 2011 and  
reducing its interest in this asset to 5.2%, TOTAL sold its entire  
stake in 2013, but kept its transport rights. TOTAL has relinquished  
its stakes in the OAM and ODC pipelines that were previously  
held by TEPMA BV.  
2.1.7.4. Asia-Pacific  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Asia-Pacific was 235 kboe/d,  
representing 10% of the Group’s total production, compared  
to 221 kboe/d in 2012 and 231 kboe/d in 2011.  
In French Guiana, TOTAL owns a 25% stake in the Guyane  
Maritime license. This license, located approximately 150 km from  
the coast in water depths ranging from 200 m to 3,000 m, covers  
an area of approximately 24,000 km². At the end of 2011, the  
authorities extended the research permit until May 31, 2016.  
In Australia, the Group produced 4 kboe/d in 2013 compared to  
5 kboe/d in 2012 and 4 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL has held leasehold  
rights in the country since 2005. The Group owns 30% of the  
Ichthys project, 27.5% of the Gladstone LNG project (GLNG),  
and nine offshore exploration licenses off the northwest coast  
in the Browse, Bonaparte and Carnarvon basins, including five that  
it operates, as well as four onshore shale gas exploration licenses  
in the southern part of the South Georgina basin. The acquisition of  
the fourth license located in the Northern Territory remains subject  
to the approval of authorities.  
In 2011, drilling at the GM-ES-1 well, which is located on the  
Zaedyus prospect at a water depth of more than 2,000 m, revealed  
two hydrocarbon columns in sandstone reservoirs. Two 3D seismic  
survey campaigns covering a total area of more than 5,000 km2  
were conducted in the center and extreme eastern portions of  
the block in 2012. A drilling campaign consisting of four wells was  
conducted from July 2012 until the end of 2013. The results  
of this campaign did not make it possible to prove the extension  
of an exploitable reservoir but the results did provided additional  
information that is currently being analyzed.  
– In early 2013, TOTAL acquired an additional 6% in the Ichthys  
project, increasing its stake to 30%. This project, launched in  
early 2012, is aimed at the development of the Ichthys gas and  
condensates field located in the Browse basin. This development  
includes a floating platform designed for gas production,  
treatment and export, an FPSO (with a maximum capacity  
of 100 kb/d of condensates) to stabilize and export condensates,  
an 889 km gas pipeline and an onshore liquefaction plant  
In Trinidad and Tobago, where TOTAL has been active since  
1
1
996, the Group’s production in 2013 was 12 kboe/d compared to  
6 kboe/d in 2012 and 12 kboe/d in 2011. In September 2013,  
TOTAL sold all of its exploration and production assets by  
disposing of the companies Total E&P Trinidad BV, which held  
a 30% stake in the Angostura offshore field located in Block 2C,  
and Elf Exploration Trinidad BV, which owned an 8.5% share in the  
adjacent exploration Block 3A. The Group no longer owns any  
exploration or production assets in the country.  
(capacities of 8.4 Mt/y of LNG and 1.6 Mt/y of NGL) located in  
Darwin. The LNG has already been sold mainly to Asian buyers  
under long-term contracts. Production start-up is expected at  
year-end 2016.  
In Uruguay, TOTAL holds a 100% stake in three exploration  
licenses: offshore Block 14, and onshore Blocks B1 and B2.  
TOTAL has an indirect interest of 27.5% in the GLNG project.  
This integrated gas production, transport and liquefaction project  
is based on the development of coal gas from the Fairview,  
24  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
Roma, Scotia and Arcadia fields. The final investment decision  
was made in early 2011 and start-up is expected in 2015.  
LNG production is expected to eventually reach 7.2 Mt/y.  
The Upstream development of the project and the construction  
of the gas pipeline and liquefaction plant are underway.  
In March 2013, TOTAL and Sinopec concluded a joint study  
agreement relating to shale gas potential on the Xuancheng license  
2
(4,000 km ) close to Nanjing. 2D seismic survey activities have been  
realized from October 2013 to February 2014 (600 km). A drilling  
campaign is scheduled for 2014 and 2015. If the results of this  
campaign are favorable, an agreement relating to the long-term  
development of these resources might subsequently be negotiated  
with Sinopec.  
In June 2013, the WA-492 and WA-493 licenses in the Carnarvon  
basin were awarded to TOTAL (100%, operator). TOTAL has  
undertaken to conduct a 2D seismic survey on these licenses  
during the coming years.  
In Indonesia, where TOTAL has had operations since 1968,  
the Group’s production in 2013 was 131 kboe/d compared to  
At the end of 2012, TOTAL reduced its share in the WA-408  
license located in the Browse basin (50%, operator) by disposing  
of 50% of its stake to partners. Two exploration wells were drilled  
in 2013. The first well, Bassett West 1, which was drilled during  
the first half of 2013, highlighted hydrocarbons. Studies are  
currently underway. The second one, which was completed  
at the end of 2013, has been definitively abandoned due to  
the negative results obtained.  
132 kboe/d in 2012 and 158 kboe/d in 2011.  
TOTAL’s operations in Indonesia are primarily concentrated on the  
Mahakam permit (50%, operator), which covers in particular the  
Peciko and Tunu gas fields. TOTAL also has a stake in the Sisi-Nubi  
gas field (47.9%, operator). The Group delivers most of its natural  
gas production to the Bontang LNG plant. The overall capacity  
of the eight liquefaction trains at this plant is 22 Mt/y.  
In 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement to enter four shale gas  
exploration licenses in the South Georgina basin in the center  
of the country. This agreement, which allows TOTAL to increase  
its stake to 68% and become the operator in the event of  
development, has now been finalized. Work started on  
the three blocks in Queensland during the course of 2013  
in the form of a 2D seismic survey that was acquired during  
the second half of the year. The first exploration wells are due  
to be drilled during 2014.  
In 2013, TOTAL’s gas production operations amounted to 1,757 Mcf/d.  
This value is down from the 2012 production level (1,871 Mcf/d)  
due to the maturity of most of the fields on the Mahakam permit,  
even though this decline was partially offset in 2013 by an increase  
in production in the South Mahakam fields. The gas operated and  
delivered by TOTAL accounted for approximately 80% of Bontang’s  
LNG supply. This gas production is supplemented by condensate  
and oil production from the Handil and Bekapai fields, which are  
operated by the Group.  
Two wells were drilled in 2011 on the WA-403 license (60%,  
operator) in the Bonaparte basin. As one well demonstrated the  
presence of hydrocarbons, additional appraisal work was  
performed on this block during 2013, including a 3D seismic  
survey, the results of which are currently being interpreted.  
– With regard to the Mahakam permit:  
-
On the Tunu field, in 2013, additional development wells were  
drilled in the main reservoir alongside in the shallow gas  
reservoirs.  
-
On the Peciko field, Phase 7 drilling, which started in 2009,  
is continuing.  
In Brunei, where TOTAL has been present since 1986, the Group  
operates the offshore Maharaja Lela Jamalulalam gas and  
condensates field located on Block B (37.5%). The Group’s  
production in 2013 was 13 kboe/d compared to 12 kboe/d in 2012  
and 13 kboe/d in 2011. The gas is delivered to the Brunei LNG  
liquefaction plant.  
- On South Mahakam, where production started in 2012 and  
which contains the Stupa, West Stupa and East Mandu  
condensate gas fields, other development wells are currently  
being drilled.  
- On the Sisi-Nubi field, which began production in 2007, drilling  
operations are continuing within the framework of a second  
phase of development. The gas from Sisi-Nubi is produced  
through Tunu’s processing facilities.  
The study of the development project started in 2010 for the  
production of the new reserves discovered in the south of the field  
(Maharaja Leila South) was finalized in 2013. The project was  
officially launched in early 2014 with the execution of most  
of the related industrial contracts and with the formal signature  
of the 20-year extension of the present petroleum contract.  
– On the Sebuku license (15%), production started at the Ruby gas  
field in October 2013. Production capacity is estimated at 100 Mcf/d.  
Ruby’s production is transported by pipeline for processing and  
separation at the Senipah terminal operated by TOTAL.  
Studies are currently being conducted to reassess the potential  
of deep-offshore exploration Block CA1 (54%, operator) and  
are expected to result in a new operating strategy. In addition,  
discussions have started in the perspective of possible unitization  
with regards to the hydrocarbon identified in the southeast part  
of the block (Jagus East well) in 2012 and the discovery made  
by BSP (Geronggong) in a neighboring block.  
– On the Sageri exploration Block (50%), the first exploration well  
(Lempuk-1X), completed in early 2012, produced negative  
results. The license is currently being relinquished.  
On the South East Mahakam exploration Block (50%, operator),  
the Tongkol South-1 exploration well, completed in September 2013,  
produced negative results.  
In China, TOTAL has been present since 2006 on the South Sulige  
Block located in the Ordos basin in the Inner Mongolia province.  
Following appraisal work by TOTAL, China National Petroleum  
Corporation (CNPC) and TOTAL agreed to a development plan  
pursuant to which CNPC is the operator and TOTAL has a 49%  
stake. The first development wells have been drilled and test-phase  
production has been underway since August 2012. The Group’s  
production in 2013 was 8 kboe/d compared to 1 kboe/d in 2012.  
In 2013, TOTAL took the necessary steps vis-à-vis the  
authorities to withdraw from the Sadang (30%), Arafura Sea  
(
24.5%) and Amborip VI (24.5%) Blocks. In addition, and  
following the withdrawal of the other partners, the Group’s  
stake in the South Sageri Block increased from 45% to  
1
00% (operator), while its share in the South Mandar Block  
increased from 33% to 49.3%.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
25  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
In February 2013, TOTAL sold 10% in the South West Bird’s  
Head exploration Block (90%, operator). This block is located  
onshore and offshore in the Salawati basin in the province of  
West Papua. Results from the Anggrek Hitam 1 exploration well,  
where drilling was completed in September 2013, were negative.  
– In the northern portion of the Bongkot field, new investments  
are in progress to allow gas demand to be met and plateau  
production to be maintained:  
-
phase 3J (two wellhead platforms) was launched as scheduled  
in 2012;  
In 2012, TOTAL acquired a 100% stake in the exploration Block  
Bengkulu I – Mentawai in the offshore Bengkulu basin, southwest  
of Sumatra. The preparatory work on the Rendang 1 exploration  
well started at the end of 2013 and drilling start-up is planned  
during the first half of 2014. The Group also acquired a stake in  
the exploration Block Telen (100%, operator) in the offshore Kutai  
basin in East Kalimantan province.  
- phase 3K (two wellhead platforms) was launched as scheduled  
in 2013;  
- phase 3L (two wellhead platforms) was approved in 2012 with  
start-up scheduled for 2014;  
- phase 3M (four wellhead platforms) was approved in March 2013  
with start-up scheduled for 2015; and  
- the fourth series of low-pressure compressors, which make  
it possible to boost gas production, was approved in 2012  
and start-up is expected in late 2014.  
In 2011, the Group acquired an 18.4% stake in a coal bed  
methane (CBM) block on Kutai II in East Kalimantan province  
as well as a 50% stake in the similar Kutai Timur Block.  
– The southern portion of the field (Greater Bongkot South) is also  
being developed in several phases. This development is  
designed to include a processing platform, a residential platform  
and thirteen production platforms:  
In Malaysia, on deep-offshore exploration Block SK 317 B  
85%, operator), which is located in Sarawak, an exploration well  
(
was started in December 2013. Following disappointing geological  
exploration results, TOTAL withdrew from the PM303 offshore  
exploration block at the start of 2011 and should do the same for  
the PM324 license (50%, operator) in May 2014 upon expiration  
of the operating period. An agreement has been reached with the  
regulator to convert the second commitment well on PM324 into  
expenditures on other exploration blocks.  
- phase 4A (six well platforms) was launched as scheduled  
in 2012;  
- phase 4B (four well platforms) is continuing and start-up  
is scheduled for 2014; and  
- development of phase 4C (three well platforms) will take place  
following the other two phases.  
In Myanmar, Group production in 2013 was 16 kboe/d compared  
to 16 kboe/d in 2012 and 15 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL is the operator  
of the Yadana field (31.2%). This field, which is located on offshore  
Blocks M5 and M6, primarily produces gas for delivery to PTT  
The exploration on these licenses continues with the drilling  
of several wells every year (seven in 2013).  
In Vietnam, the Group no longer possesses any exploration  
asset following the sale in August 2013 of its stake in offshore  
Block 15-1/05 (35%).  
(the Thai state-owned company) for use in Thai power plants.  
The Yadana field also supplies the domestic market via  
two pipelines built and operated by MOGE, a Myanmar  
state-owned company.  
2.1.7.5. Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS)  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in the CIS was 227 kboe/d,  
representing 10% of total Group production, compared  
to 195 kboe/d in 2012 and 119 kboe/d in 2011.  
In 2012, TOTAL acquired a 40% share in a production sharing  
agreement on the M-11 offshore Block in the Martaban basin.  
The first exploration well, Manizawta-1, drilled in 2013 is dry.  
In Azerbaijan, where TOTAL has been present since 1996 on the  
Shah Deniz field (10%), production amounted to 20 kboe/d in 2013  
and has been growing regularly year-on-year since 2010. TOTAL  
also has a 10% stake in the South Caucasus Pipeline Company  
In Papua New Guinea, TOTAL acquired in 2012 a 40% stake in  
the PPL234 and PPL244 offshore permits, as well as 50% in the  
PRL10 offshore permit and an option for 35% of the PPL338 and  
PPL339 onshore permits. The results of two exploration wells  
drilled on PPL244 are unsuccessful. An onshore 2D seismic survey  
was also conducted in 2013.  
(SCP) gas pipeline, which transports the gas produced at Shah  
Deniz to the Turkish and Georgian markets. TOTAL also holds a 5%  
stake in the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, which connects  
Baku and the Mediterranean Sea and, among other functions,  
evacuates the condensates from the gas transported from Shah Deniz.  
In March 2014, TOTAL acquired a stake in Block PRL-15 (40.1%)  
and an option to acquire an interest in exploration Blocks PPL-474,  
PPL-475, PPL-476 and PPL-477 and in the Triceratops discovery  
Gas deliveries to Turkey and Georgia continued throughout 2013,  
at a lower pace for Turkey due to weaker demand than initially  
expected. As in 2012, however, the Azerbaijan state-owned  
SOCAR continued to take greater quantities of gas than provided  
for by the agreement, thus making it possible for the facilities to  
operate at maximum capacity.  
(PRL-39) located in the same zone. The government of Papua New  
Guinea retains the right to back-in for 22.5% when the final  
decision is made. In such scenario, TOTAL will hold a 31.1%  
participating interest when the final decision is made. Block PRL-15  
contains two major discoveries: Elk and Antelope.  
In the Philippines, TOTAL has held since 2012 a 75% stake in the  
SC56 license in the southern Sulu Sea. The program of operations  
includes the refurbishment of older seismic lines and a new seismic  
campaign that was realized at the beginning of 2013. The collected  
data is currently being interpreted.  
Following the agreements signed in 2011 regarding the sale  
of additional gas volumes to Turkey and the transfer conditions  
for volumes intended for the European market, the final investment  
decision concerning the second phase of development at Shah  
Deniz was made in December 2013. In September 2013, gas sales  
3
In Thailand, the Group’s production in 2013 was 63 kboe/d  
compared to 55 kboe/d in 2012 and 41 kboe/d in 2011. This  
production comes from the Bongkot (33.33%) offshore gas and  
condensates field. PTT purchases all of the natural gas and  
condensates production from this field.  
agreements representing a total volume of 10 Gm /y were signed  
with European buyers. These volumes are expected to be  
transported from 2021 through Turkey via the Trans Anatolian  
pipeline (TANAP) within the framework of a project headed by  
SOCAR, and via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) that is expected  
26  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
transported from 2021 through Turkey via the Trans Anatolian  
pipeline (TANAP) within the framework of a project headed by  
SOCAR, and via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) that is expected  
to link Turkey to Italy and in which TOTAL acquired a 10% stake  
in July 2013.  
late 2017. The LNG produced is intended for sale in Europe and  
Asia using ice-class LNG tankers. The final investment decision  
was made in December 2013. The company Yamal LNG is  
jointly-owned by Novatek (60%), TOTAL (20%) and, as of  
January 2014, CNPC (20%).  
With regard to the Absheron Block in the Caspian Sea, TOTAL  
In January 2014, Novatek increased its stake in the company  
Severenergia (production of 100 kb/d in 2013) by acquiring ENI’s  
shares through the company Arcticgaz (50/50 Joint venture  
between Novatek and Gazpromneft). In December 2013,  
Novatek exchanged its interest held in Sibneftegas for the  
entirety of Rosneft’s interests in Severenergia. Since June 2013,  
Novatek has held a 50% stake in the Nortgaz field.  
(40%) is the operator during the exploration phase and a joint  
operating company will manage operations during the development  
and production phase. A discovery and commerciality declaration  
was filed in 2012 following a significant discovery in 2011.  
The development plan for the field is currently being prepared.  
Discussions are underway for the construction of a drilling rig  
in the Caspian Sea in order to prepare for the development  
of this discovery.  
In 2013, TOTAL undertook conceptual studies showing that new  
technical solutions could allow a viable development of the  
Shtokman field. Discussions with Gazprom for further studies are  
required to find a technical, contractual and economically viable  
solution for the development of the Shtokman field.  
In Kazakhstan, TOTAL has been active since 1992 through its  
16.81% stake in the North Caspian license, which covers the  
Kashagan field in particular.  
The Kashagan project is expected to develop the field in several  
phases. Production from the first phase (300 kb/d) started on  
September 11, 2013 and was first halted on September 24, 2013,  
and then, after having been restarted, a second time on October 9,  
In Tajikistan, TOTAL acquired a 33.3% stake in the Bocktar Block  
in the first half of 2013. The agreement represents the start of  
TOTAL’s activity in the country. Environmental and societal studies  
started at the beginning of 2014. The first phase of a seismic  
campaign covering 800 km is due to start in 2014, with initial drilling  
operations planned for late 2015.  
2013, due to leaks detected on the gas export pipeline.  
Investigations are underway in order to identify the origin of these  
technical malfunctions and to allow production to resume rapidly.  
2
.1.7.6. Europe  
In November 2012, TOTAL acquired a 75% share in the North  
and South Nurmunai onshore exploration blocks. These two blocks  
cover an area of 14,600 km and are located in the southwest of  
the country. A 2D seismic survey was conducted on each of these  
blocks in 2013. The data is currently being interpreted and a well is  
planned to be drilled in 2014.  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in Europe was 392 kboe/d,  
representing 17% of the Group’s overall production, compared  
to 427 kboe/d in 2012 and 512 kboe/d in 2011.  
2
In Bulgaria, the Khan Asparuh license, which covers 14,220 km2  
in the Black Sea, was awarded to TOTAL in 2012. In March 2013,  
TOTAL sold 60% of its stake and has retained 40% of this block.  
TOTAL will be the operator as of April 2014. A 2D and 3D seismic  
survey was performed from June 2013 to January 2014. The data  
is due to be processed and interpreted in 2014 in order to define  
drilling objectives in 2015 and 2016.  
In Russia, where TOTAL has had operations through its subsidiary  
since 1991, the Group’s production in 2013 was 207 kboe/d  
compared to 179 kboe/d in 2012 and 105 kboe/d in 2011.  
This production comes from the Kharyaga field and from TOTAL’s  
stake in the Russian company Novatek, which is listed in Moscow  
and London.  
In Cyprus, TOTAL has been present since February 2013 in the  
deep-offshore exploration Blocks 10 (100%, operator) and 11  
(100%, operator) located southwest of the country. A 3D seismic  
survey was completed on Block 11 in 2013. A 2D seismic survey  
on Block 10 started in February 2014.  
On the Kharyaga field (40%, operator), work related to the  
development plan for Phases 3 and 4 is ongoing. This plan aims  
to maintain plateau oil production above 30 kboe/d. Phase 3 is  
expected to be completed in 2015 with the end of the flaring of  
the associated gas.  
In Denmark, TOTAL has, since 2010, owned an 80% stake in  
and the operatorship of licenses 1/10 (Nordjylland) and 2/10  
(Nordsjaelland, formerly Frederoskilde). These onshore licenses,  
of which the shale gas potential continues to be assessed,  
cover areas of 3,000 km² and 2,300 km², respectively. Following  
geoscience surveys on license 1/10 in 2011, the decision was  
made to drill a well. Initially planned for 2013, this well is now  
scheduled for 2014 due to additional environmental studies  
requested by the local authorities. Geoscience studies are ongoing  
on license 2/10 and a gravimetry acquisition was made in 2013.  
In compliance with the strategic partnership agreement signed  
in 2011 with Novatek, TOTAL continued to increase its share  
in Novatek to 16.9636% as of December 31, 2013 and intends  
to further increase its share up to 19.4%.  
TOTAL is currently participating in two projects with Novatek:  
Termokarstovoye: This onshore deposit of gas and condensates  
is located in the Yamalo-Nenets district. The development  
and production license for the Termokarstovoye field is owned  
by ZAO Terneftegas, a joint venture between Novatek (51%)  
and TOTAL (49%). The development of this field started in late  
In France, the Group’s production in 2013 was 9 kboe/d compared  
to 13 kboe/d in 2012 and 18 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL’s major assets  
are the Lacq (100%) and Meillon (100%) gas fields, located in the  
southwest part of the country.  
2011, with production start-up being expected for mid-2015 at  
a capacity of 65 kboe/d.  
Yamal LNG: The aim of this project, which has been declared  
to be of national interest by Russian authorities, is to develop the  
South Tambey gas and condensates field in the Yamal Peninsula  
and to construct a three-train gas liquefaction plant with an LNG  
production capacity of 16.5 Mt/y. The first production is expected  
On the Lacq field, which started production in 1957, a carbon  
dioxide capture, injection and storage pilot was commissioned in  
2010. In connection with this project, a boiler was modified to  
operate in an oxy-fuel combustion environment and the CO2  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
27  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
emitted was captured and re-injected in the depleted Rousse field.  
As part of TOTAL’s Sustainable Development policy, this project  
allowed the Group to assess one of the technological possibilities  
for reducing CO2 emissions. Most of the objectives of the  
– In the Norwegian North Sea, the most substantial contribution to  
the Group’s production, which is for the most part non-operated,  
comes from the Greater Ekofisk Area (e.g., Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Embla).  
In the southern Norwegian North Sea:  
experiment having been reached, the injection of CO came to  
2
In the Greater Ekofisk Area, the Group owns a 39.9% stake  
in the Ekofisk and Eldfisk fields. The Ekofisk South and Eldfisk  
an end in the first quarter of 2013. For additional information,  
see Chapter 7. As anticipated, TOTAL ended the operations  
on Lacq in October, 2013.  
2
projects, each with a capacity of 70 kboe/d, were launched  
in 2011. Production at Ekofisk South started in October 2013,  
while start-up at Eldfisk 2 is expected in early 2015. The project  
relating to the construction and installation of the new Ekofisk  
accommodation and field services center platform has now  
been completed and the accommodation has been operational  
as of November 2013.  
The sale agreements of Itteville, Vert-le-Grand, Vert-le-Petit  
and La Croix Blanche assets were signed in 2011, while those  
of Dommartin Lettrée, Vic-Bilh, Lacq, Lagrave and Pécorade assets  
were signed in 2012. The approval of the authorities has been  
obtained for the sale of all of these licenses, with the exception  
of the Lacq asset, for which approval is expected to be granted  
in 2014.  
In the central part of the Norwegian North Sea:  
Gas production start-up at the Atla field, located on license  
PL102C (40%, operator) and Beta West field (10%), a satellite  
of Sleipner, took place in October 2012 and April 2011,  
respectively.  
The Montélimar exclusive exploration license awarded to TOTAL  
in 2010 to assess, in particular, the shale gas potential of the area,  
was revoked by the government in October 2011. This revocation  
stemmed from the law of July 13, 2011, prohibiting the exploration  
and extraction of hydrocarbons by drilling followed by hydraulic  
fracturing. The Group had submitted the required report to the  
government in which it undertook not to use hydraulic fracturing  
in light of the current prohibition. An appeal filed in December 2011  
with the administrative court requesting that the judge cancel the  
revocation of the license is still pending.  
The development of the Gina Krog structure (38%), formerly  
known as Dagny and located to the north of Sleipner, was  
approved in 2013. Production start-up is planned for 2017.  
On license PL036D (24.24%), the fast-track development of Vilje  
South was launched in 2011. Production start-up is expected  
in the first half of 2014.  
In the northern part of the Norwegian North Sea:  
In Italy, TOTAL holds a stake in two exploration licenses and has  
an interest in the Tempa Rossa field (50%, operator), discovered  
in 1989 and located on the Gorgoglione concession (Basilicate  
region). Although preparation work started in 2008, the  
The Islay field (100%, operator) was put into production in 2012.  
This field extends on each side of the Norwegian/Great Britain  
border and the Group’s interest in the Norwegian part is 5.51%.  
The Stjerne field, located on license PL104 (14.7%), and Visund  
South field, located on license PL120 (7.7%), were put into  
production in July 2013 and November 2012, respectively.  
On license PL120 (7.7%), the fast-track development of Visund  
North, which started in late 2011, made it possible to start  
production on the field in November 2013.  
On the Greater Hild Area (51%, operator), located in the north,  
the Martin Linge development scheme was approved by the  
authorities in 2012, with production start-up scheduled end 2016  
at an estimated capacity of 80 kboe/d.  
proceedings initiated by the Prosecutor of the Potenza Court  
against Total Italia led to a freeze in the preparation work (for  
additional information on this dispute, see point 4., Chapter 4,  
Legal and arbitration proceedings). After resuming the preparation  
work, the final investment decision was made in July 2012 and  
production start-up is expected for 2016 at a capacity of 55  
kboe/d. Following a call for tenders, all the civil engineering and  
construction contracts were awarded in 2012 and are currently  
in progress. The Gorgoglione 2 well was tested in 2012 and  
confirmed the results obtained from the other wells. The drilling  
of a sidetrack at well TR-2 started in November 2013.  
The Oseberg Delta phase 2 project (14.7%), located on production  
licenses PL104 and PL79, was approved by the authorities in  
October 2013 and production start-up is planned for 2015.  
In March 2013, TOTAL finalized an agreement to sell 25% of the  
stake acquired in Tempa Rossa in 2011. This transfer, which  
reduced the Group’s holding from 75% to 50%, took place in  
June 2013 following the approval of the Italian authorities.  
In the Norwegian Sea, the Haltenbanken area includes the  
Tyrihans (23.2%), Linnorm (20%), Mikkel (7.7%) and Kristin (6%)  
fields as well as the Åsgard field (7.7%) and its satellites  
Yttergryta (24.5%) and Morvin (6%).  
In Norway, where the Group has had operations since the mid-  
1
960s, TOTAL has equity stakes in 104 production licenses on the  
The Åsgard sub-sea compression project, which will increase  
hydrocarbon recovery on the Åsgard and Mikkel fields,  
was approved by the Norwegian authorities in 2012. All the  
main contracts have been awarded.  
Development of the Linnorm gas field is still under study following  
the lower than expected results obtained at the Onyx South  
exploration well, which was drilled in 2013. It was planned to  
export the gas from Linnorm to the Nyhamna onshore terminal  
by installing a new pipeline (Polarled project).  
The Polarled project (5.11%) was approved in December 2012.  
The project consists of the installation of a 481 km long pipeline  
from the Aasta Hansen field to the Nyhamna terminal and in the  
expansion of the terminal.  
Norwegian continental shelf, 31 of which it operates. In 2013,  
the Group’s production was 243 kboe/d, with 74 kboe/d from the  
Greater Ekofisk Area located in the southern sector of the North  
Sea, 103 kboe/d from the central and northern portions of the  
North Sea and 66 kboe/d from the Haltenbanken region (in the  
Norwegian Sea) and the Barents Sea. The Group’s production in  
Norway in 2012 was 275 kboe/d and 287 kboe/d in 2011.  
The decrease in production between 2011 and 2013 was mainly  
due to the decline of mature fields. Production should increase  
again and reach a level of around 300 kboe/d at the horizon 2017  
with the start-up of several new fields, the developments of which  
have been launched (Martin Linge, Ekofisk South, Eldfisk II).  
28  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
In the Barents Sea, a project intended to improve the performance  
of the Snøhvit liquefaction plant (18.4%, capacity of 4.2 Mt/y)  
was launched in 2012. This plant is supplied with gas from the  
Snøhvit, Albatross and Askeladd fields.  
respectively. Well N55, which was drilled in 2012 in the Brent  
South West panel, is expected to be put into production in the  
middle of 2014.  
On the Dunbar field (100%), a new drilling campaign (Dunbar  
phase IV) is due to begin during the second quarter 2014 and is  
expected to include three work-overs and six new wells.  
Several exploration wells were successfully drilled on a number of  
licenses during the 2011-2013 period and revealed the presence of  
hydrocarbons at the structures of Smørbukk North (PL479, 7.68%)  
and Rhea (PL120, 7.68%) in 2013, Garantiana (PL554, 40%, operator)  
and King Lear (PL146 and 333, 22.2%) in 2012, and Alve North  
The Islay field (100%, operator) was put into production in 2012.  
This field extends on each side of the Norwegian/Great Britain  
border and the Group’s interest in the UK portion is 94.49%.  
(PL127, 50%, operator) and Norvarg (PL535, 40%, operator) in 2011.  
The Novarg appraisal well drilled in 2013 confirmed the presence  
of gas in the structure, but the well results, which are under study  
as of December 31, 2013, are below expectations.  
In 2012, TOTAL finalized the divestment of its stake in the  
Otter field.  
In Central Graben, TOTAL increased its stake in Elgin Franklin  
Oil & Gas (EFOG), a company through which it holds an interest  
in the Elgin and Franklin fields (46.2%, operator), from 77.5% to  
100% at the end of 2011. Production at the Elgin, Franklin and  
West Franklin fields was stopped following a gas leak on the  
Elgin field in March 2012. In May 2012, TOTAL confirmed that  
the leak from well G4 had been successfully stopped and,  
at the end of October 2012, well G4 was definitively secured by  
installing five cement plugs. The enquiry led by TOTAL permitted  
the clear identification of the causes of the accident and the  
definition of new criteria for well integrity to allow the resumption  
of production at Elgin/Franklin in total safety. Production in the  
Elgin/Franklin area resumed in March 2013 following the approval  
of the safety case by the UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE).  
Production has gradually risen to 55 kboe/d (approximately  
In addition, the Group is continuing to optimize its asset portfolio  
in Norway by obtaining new licenses and divesting a number of  
non-strategic assets.  
In the Netherlands, TOTAL has had natural gas exploration and  
production operations since 1964 and currently owns twenty-four  
offshore production licenses, including twenty that it operates,  
and two offshore exploration licenses, E17c (16.92%) and K1c  
(30%). In 2013, the Group’s production was 35 kboe/d compared  
to 33 kboe/d in 2012 and 38 kboe/d in 2011.  
Following the acquisition of additional stakes at the end of 2013,  
TOTAL now holds 50% stakes in Block K5b and 60% in Blocks  
K1b/K2a and K2c. TOTAL is the operator of these three blocks.  
A 3D seismic survey of several offshore permits covering an area  
2
5 kboe/d on the Group’s account), representing 40% of the  
2
of 3,500 km was conducted in 2012. The results of this  
production potential of these fields. In order to recover the  
production level expected before the Elgin incident by 2015,  
a redevelopment project envisaging the drilling of new infill wells  
on Elgin and Franklin started in July 2013. Drilling work is due  
to start on Elgin in early 2015.  
campaign are currently being interpreted.  
The development project K4-Z (50%, operator) started  
production in August 2013. This development project was  
launched in 2011 and consists of two sub-sea wells connected  
to the existing production and transport facilities.  
In addition, the West Franklin Phase II development project  
remains ongoing with production start-up scheduled for  
mid-2014.  
The L4-D field (55.66%, operator) started production in 2012.  
Production from the K5-CU project (49%, operator) started in  
early 2011.  
– In addition to Alwyn and the Central Graben, a third area, west  
of Shetland, is undergoing development. This area covers the  
fields of Laggan and Tormore (80%, operator) and the P967  
license (50%, operator), which includes the Tobermory gas  
discovery. The decision to develop the Laggan and Tormore  
fields was made in 2010 and production is scheduled to start in  
In Poland, at the beginning of 2012, TOTAL signed an agreement  
to acquire a 49% stake in the Chelm and Werbkowice exploration  
concessions in order to assess their shale gas potential. A well was  
drilled and tested on the Chelm permit in 2011. The results from the  
well were analyzed in 2012 and 2013. In December 2013, following  
the departure of the operator, TOTAL increased its stake to 100%  
and became the operator of this permit. In 2012, the Werbkowice  
permit was relinquished.  
2
014 with an expected capacity of 90 kboe/d. The development  
scheme includes: sub-sea production facilities; off-gas treatment  
gas and condensates) at a plant located near the Sullom Voe  
(
terminal in the Shetland Islands, 150 km away; and a new gas  
pipeline connected to the Frigg gas line (FUKA) for the export of  
gas to the Saint Fergus terminal.  
In the United Kingdom, where TOTAL has had operations since  
1962, the Group’s production in 2013 was 105 kboe/d compared  
to 106 kboe/d in 2012 and 169 kboe/d in 2011. About 90% of  
production comes from operated fields located in two major zones:  
the Alwyn zone in the northern North Sea, and the Elgin/Franklin  
zone in the Central Graben. In 2012, the shutdown of the Elgin,  
Franklin and West Franklin fields, due to a gas leak from well G4  
in Elgin, severely impacted production. Production at these three  
fields was resumed in March 2013.  
In early 2011, a gas and condensate discovery was made on the  
Edradour East license (75%, operator) near Laggan and Tormore.  
The decision to develop Edradour East using the existing  
infrastructure was made at the end of 2012. The Edradour  
development scheme is currently being optimized in order to  
include other possible fields in the same zone. Next to the  
Edradour East discovery, a second well (Spinnaker) started in  
September 2013 and is currently being drilled.  
In the Alwyn zone (100%), the start-up of satellite fields or new  
reservoir compartments made it possible to compensate in part  
for the natural decline in production potential. Consequently,  
wells N54 and N53 were put into production in 2012 and 2011,  
TOTAL also holds a stake in three assets operated by other parties:  
the Bruce (43.25%), Keith (25%), and Markham (7.35%) fields.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
29  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
The Group’s stakes in other fields operated by third parties  
is expected to increase the production up to 200 kb/d by the  
end of 2014. The definitive development plan, which is expected  
to make it possible to achieve a plateau of 535 kb/d, was approved  
by the authorities in August 2013.  
(Seymour, Alba, Armada, Maria, Moira, Mungo/Monan and Everest)  
were sold off in 2012.  
Nine new licenses (three in the northern North Sea, three in  
Central Graben and three in West Shetland) were awarded to  
TOTAL in 2012 during the twenty-seventh exploration round.  
In early 2013, TOTAL acquired an 80% stake and became operator  
2
of the Baranan exploration Block (729 km , southeast of Soulaymaniyah,  
in the Kurdistan area). A 2D seismic survey of 213 km was completed  
in January 2014. The data of this seismic is expected to result in  
the drilling of a first exploration well at the end of 2014  
Early 2014, TOTAL acquired a 40% stake in two shale gas  
exploration licenses (PEDL 139 et 140) located in the Gainsborough  
Trough basin of the East Midlands, and signed an agreement that  
permits the Group to acquire a 50% stake in the licence PEDL 209  
located in the same area.  
Since 2012, TOTAL has held a 35% stake in the Safen and Harir  
2
2
exploration Blocks (424 km and 705 km , respectively, located to  
the northeast of Erbil), as well as a 20% stake in the Taza Block  
2
2.1.7.7. Middle East  
(505 km , located southwest of Sulaymaniyah). During 2013, four  
exploration wells were drilled and resulted in two discoveries  
located in the Taza and Harir Blocks. The drilling of five new wells  
is planned for 2014 on three of these four blocks. In early 2014,  
TOTAL increased its stake in the Safen Block to 80% and became  
the operator.  
In 2013, TOTAL’s production in the Middle East was 536  
kboe/d, representing 23% of the Group’s production,  
compared to 493 kboe/d in 2012 and 570 kboe/d in 2011.  
In the United Arab Emirates, where TOTAL has had operations  
since 1939, the Group’s production in 2013 was 260 kboe/d  
compared to 246 kboe/d in 2012 and 240 kboe/d in 2011. In 2013,  
the country maintained a steady rhythm of production which led  
to an increase in TOTAL’s share of production. The increase  
in production in 2013 was mainly due to higher production by  
Abu Dhabi Company for Onshore Oil Operations (ADCO).  
In Iran, the Group has had no production since 2010. For further  
information on TOTAL and Iran, see Chapter 4 (Risk factors).  
In Oman, the Group’s production in 2013 was 37 kboe/d, stable  
compared to 2012 and 2011. TOTAL primarily produces oil on  
Block 6 (4%)(1) as well as on Block 53 (2%)(2), and it also produces  
LNG through its stake in the Oman LNG (5.54%)/Qalhat LNG  
TOTAL holds a 75% stake (operator) in the Abu Al Bu Khoosh field,  
a 9.5% stake in ADCO, which operates the five major onshore  
fields in Abu Dhabi, and a 13.3% stake in Abu Dhabi Marine  
(
2.04%)(3) liquefaction plant, which has a capacity of 10.5 Mt/y.  
In December 2013, TOTAL obtained the license for ultra-deep-  
offshore Block 41.  
(
ADMA), which operates two offshore fields. TOTAL also has a 15%  
stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Industries (GASCO), which produces NGL  
natural gas liquids) and condensates from the associated gas  
In Qatar, where TOTAL has had operations since 1936, the Group’s  
production in 2013 was 137 kboe/d compared to 139 kboe/d in  
2012 and 155 kboe/d in 2011. The Group has equity stakes in the  
Al Khalij field (40%), the NFB Block (20%) in the North field, the  
Qatargas 1 liquefaction plant (10%) and train 5 of Qatargas 2 (16.7%).  
(
produced by ADCO as well as from the gas and condensates  
and associated gases produced by ADMA. TOTAL also has a 5%  
stake in Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company (ADGAS), which  
processes the associated gas produced by ADMA in order to  
produce LNG, NGL and condensates, and further possesses a 5%  
holding in National Gas Shipping Company (NGSCO), which owns  
eight LNG tankers and exports the LNG produced by ADGAS.  
In 2012, TOTAL and state-owned Qatar Petroleum signed a new  
agreement to continue their partnership on the Al Khalij field for  
an additional 25-year period as of 2014. TOTAL will continue to  
be the operator (40%) alongside Qatar Petroleum (60%).  
The ADCO license expired in January 2014 and the Abu Dhabi  
authorities have issued a call for tenders for the renewal of the  
license as of January 1, 2015.  
The production contract for the Dolphin gas project, signed in  
2001 with Qatar Petroleum, provides for the sale of 2 Bcf/d of  
gas from the North Field for a 25-year period. The gas is  
processed in the Dolphin plant in Ras Laffan and exported to the  
United Arab Emirates through a 360 km gas pipeline.  
The Group holds a 24.5% stake in Dolphin Energy Ltd. in  
partnership with Mubadala, a company owned by the government  
of Abu Dhabi, in order to market gas produced in Qatar primarily  
to the United Arab Emirates.  
The production capacity of train 5 of Qatargas 2 is 8 Mt/y. TOTAL  
has been a shareholder in this train since 2006. An agreement to  
share the two liquefaction trains of the Qatargas 2 project (trains  
4 and 5) was signed in 2011. The agreement provides for an  
equal split of the physical production of the two trains as well as  
of the associated operating costs and capital outlay. In addition,  
TOTAL offtakes part of the LNG produced in compliance with  
the contracts signed in 2006, which provide for the purchase  
of 5.2 Mt/y of LNG from Qatargas 2 by the Group.  
The Group also owns 33.33% of Ruwais Fertilizer Industries  
(FERTIL), which produces urea. The FERTIL 2 project was started in  
July 2013 and enabled FERTIL to more than double its production  
capacity to 2 Mt/y.  
In Iraq, the Group’s production was 7 kboe/d in 2013 compared to  
6
kboe/d on average for the year 2012. TOTAL holds an 18.75%  
stake in the consortium that was awarded the development and  
production contract for the Halfaya field in the Missan province.  
Production of Phase 1 of the project, which has a capacity of  
The Group became a partner in the offshore BC exploration permit  
(25%) in 2011. The first exploration well is due to be drilled during  
the first half of 2014.  
100 kb/d, started in June 2012. Phase 2, under construction,  
(
(
(
1) TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 4% in Petroleum Development Oman LLC, operator of Block 6, via its 10% interest in Pohol.  
2) TOTAL holds an indirect interest of 2% in Block 53.  
3) TOTAL’s indirect stake in Qalhat LNG through its stake in Oman LNG.  
30  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
In Syria, TOTAL has a 100% stake in the Deir Ez Zor permit, which  
is operated by the joint-venture company DEZPC in which TOTAL  
and the state-owned company SPC each have a 50% share.  
TOTAL also holds the Tabiyeh contract, which came into effect  
in 2009. The Group had no production in the country in 2013  
or in 2012 compared to 53 kboe/d in 2011. TOTAL suspended its  
activities contributing to the production of hydrocarbons in Syria  
in December 2011, in compliance with the European Union’s  
regulations regarding this country. For additional information,  
see Chapter 4 (Risk Factors).  
southern coast. This plant is supplied with the gas produced on  
Block 18, located near Marib in the center of the country, via a  
320 km gas pipeline. The Balhaf plant suffered two rocket attacks  
in December 2013 and January 2014, but production was not  
impacted because one of the rockets resulted in slight damage  
and the other landed in the sea. Security measures have since  
been adapted due to the evolving risks.  
TOTAL also has stakes in two oil basins, as the operator of Block  
10 (Masila Basin, East Shabwa license, 28.57%) and as a partner  
on Block 5 (Marib basin, Jannah license, 15%).  
In Yemen, where TOTAL has had operations since 1987,  
the Group’s production was 95 kboe/d in 2013 compared to  
TOTAL owns stakes in five onshore exploration licenses: 40% in  
Blocks 69 and 71, 50.1% in Block 70 (operator); 36% in Block 72  
6
5 Kboe/d in 2012 and 86 kboe/d in 2011.  
TOTAL owns a 39.62% stake in the Yemen LNG liquefaction plant  
capacity of 6.7 Mt/y), which is located in Balhaf on the country’s  
(operator); and 40% in Block 3 (operator).  
(
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
31  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
2.1.8. Oil and gas acreage  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
(in thousands of acres at year-end)  
Undeveloped  
acreage(  
Developed  
acreage  
Undeveloped  
Developed  
acreage  
Undeveloped  
Developed  
acreage  
a)  
(a)  
(a)  
acreage  
acreage  
Europe  
Africa  
Gross  
Net  
10,804  
5,305  
722  
163  
10,015  
6,882  
724  
176  
6,478  
3,497  
781  
185  
Gross  
Net  
134,157  
86,493  
1,266  
341  
135,610  
88,457  
1,256  
337  
110,346  
65,391  
1,229  
333  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Gross  
Net  
19,790  
9,391  
960  
286  
16,604  
6,800  
1,705  
330  
15,454  
5,349  
1,028  
329  
Gross  
Net  
33,242  
4,534  
1,482  
192  
32,369  
3,082  
1,896  
256  
31,671  
2,707  
1,461  
217  
Gross  
Net  
55,980  
29,880  
1,064  
309  
37,208  
18,184  
955  
270  
40,552  
19,591  
930  
255  
Total  
Gross  
Net(b)  
253,973  
135,603  
5,494  
1,291  
231,806  
123,405  
6,536  
1,369  
204,501  
96,535  
5,429  
1,319  
(
(
a) Undeveloped acreage includes leases and concessions.  
b) Net acreage equals the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross acreage.  
2.1.9. Number of productive wells  
2013  
Gross  
productive  
wells  
Net  
productive  
wells(a)  
As of Decembrer 31,  
(wells at year-end)  
Europe  
Africa  
Oil  
Gas  
403  
286  
106  
87  
Oil  
Gas  
2,269  
156  
615  
48  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Oil  
Gas  
868  
3,311  
266  
634  
Oil  
Gas  
6,283  
295  
441  
36  
Oil  
229  
81  
Gas  
2,306  
741  
Total  
Oil  
Gas  
10,052  
6,354  
1,509  
1,546  
(a) Net well equal the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.  
32  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2.1.10. Number of net productive and dry wells drilled  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
(wells at year-end)  
Net  
productive  
wells  
Net dry  
Net total  
wells  
Net  
productive  
wells  
Net dry  
Net total  
wells  
Net  
productive  
wells  
Net dry  
Net total  
wells  
wells  
wells  
wells  
drilled(  
a) (c)  
drilled  
(a) (c)  
drilled  
(a) (c)  
drilled  
(a) (c)  
drilled  
(a) (c)  
drilled  
(a) (c)  
drilled(  
a) (b)  
drilled  
(a) (b)  
drilled  
(a) (b)  
Exploratory  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
1.5  
1.5  
2.9  
0.6  
1.6  
0.2  
5.1  
1.4  
0.7  
4.3  
1.7  
6.6  
4.3  
1.3  
5.9  
0.9  
4.9  
3.9  
-
3.3  
2.8  
0.6  
-
4.2  
7.7  
4.5  
-
1.5  
2.9  
1.2  
1.2  
2.1  
1.7  
1.5  
1.3  
0.8  
3.7  
3.2  
4.4  
2.5  
2.0  
5.8  
2.4  
1.4  
3.8  
Total  
8.1  
11.7  
19.8  
12.1  
8.1  
20.2  
8.9  
9.0  
17.9  
Development  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
6.9  
19.7  
98.0  
42.7  
198.0  
0.3  
0.4  
-
0.3  
-
7.2  
20.1  
98.0  
43.0  
198.0  
6.0  
22.7  
70.6  
43.3  
127.8  
0.7  
6.7  
22.7  
70.6  
43.3  
127.8  
7.5  
24.7  
113.1  
32.6  
-
-
-
2.6  
-
7.5  
24.7  
113.1  
35.2  
-
-
-
-
118.4  
118.4  
Total  
Total  
365.3  
373.4  
1.0  
366.3  
386.1  
270.4  
282.5  
0.7  
8.8  
271.1  
291.3  
296.3  
305.2  
2.6  
11.6  
298.9  
316.8  
12.7  
(a) Net wells equal the sum of the Company’s fractional interests in gross wells.  
(b) Includes certain exploratory wells that were abandoned, but which would have been capable of producing oil in sufficient quantities to justify completion.  
(c) For information: service wells and stratigraphic wells drilled within oil sands operations in Canada are not reported in this table (86.2 wells in 2013, 131.7 in 2012 and 82.2 in 2011).  
2
.1.11. Exploratory and development wells in the process of being drilled  
(
including wells temporarily suspended)  
As of Decembrer 31,  
2013  
Gross(a)  
(wells at year-end)  
Net(a) (b)  
Exploratory  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
2
31  
15  
10  
15  
1.5  
9.8  
6.7  
3.6  
5.7  
Total  
73  
27.3  
Development  
Europe  
Africa  
35  
27  
13.4  
7.7  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
348  
129  
821  
120.7  
15.8  
246.1  
Total  
Total  
1,360  
1,433  
403.7  
431.0  
(a) From 2013, includes wells for which surface facilities permitting production have not yet been constructed. Such wells are also reported in the table “Number of net productive and dry  
wells drilled”, above, for the year in which they are drilled.  
(b) Net wells equal the sum of the Group’s equity stakes in gross wells.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
33  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
2.1.12. Interests in pipelines  
The table below sets forth TOTAL’s interests in oil and gas pipelines as of December 31, 2013.  
Pipeline(s)  
Europe  
Origin  
Destination  
% interest Operator Liquids  
Gas  
Norway  
Frostpipe (inhibited)  
Heimdal to Brae Condensate Line  
Kvitebjorn pipeline  
Lille-Frigg, Froy  
Heimdal  
Kvitebjorn  
Ekofisk Treatment center  
Oseberg, Brage and Veslefrikk Sture  
Oseberg  
Brae  
Mongstad  
Teeside (UK)  
36.25  
16.76  
5.00  
34.93  
12.98  
10.00  
x
x
x
x
x
x
Norpipe Oil  
Oseberg Transport System  
Sleipner East Condensate Pipe  
Troll Oil Pipeline I and II  
Sleipner East  
Troll B and C  
Karsto  
Vestprosess  
(
Mongstad refinery)  
Vestprosess  
Mongstad refinery)  
3.71  
x
x
Vestprosess  
Polared  
Kollsnes (Area E)  
(
5.00  
5.11  
Asta Hansteen/Linnorm  
Nyhamna  
x
The Netherlands  
Nogat pipeline  
WGT K13-Den Helder  
WGT K13-Extension  
F3-FB  
K13A  
Markham  
Den Helder  
Den Helder  
K13 (via K4/K5)  
5.00  
4.66  
23.00  
x
x
x
United Kingdom  
Alwyn Liquid Export Line  
Bruce Liquid Export Line  
Central Graben Liquid Export Line (LEP) Elgin-Franklin  
Frigg System: UK line  
Ninian Pipeline System  
Alwyn North  
Bruce  
Cormorant  
Forties (Unity)  
ETAP  
100.00  
43.25  
15.89  
100.00  
16.00  
25.73  
54.66  
x
x
x
x
x
x
Alwyn North, Bruce and others St.Fergus (Scotland)  
Ninian  
Elgin-Franklin, Shearwater  
Bacton  
x
Sullom Voe  
Bacton  
Interconnector  
x
Shearwater Elgin Area Line (SEAL)  
SEAL to Interconnector Link (SILK)  
x
x
Africa  
Gabon  
Mandji Pipes  
Rabi Pipes  
Mandji fields  
Rabi fields  
Cap Lopez Terminal  
Cap Lopez Terminal  
100.00(a)  
100.00(a)  
x
x
x
x
Americas  
Argentina  
Gas Andes  
TGN  
Neuquén Basin (Argentina) Santiago (Chile)  
Network (Northern Argentina)  
56.50  
15.40  
32.68  
x
x
x
x
TGM  
TGN  
Uruguyana (Brazil)  
Bolivia  
Transierra  
Yacuiba (Bolivia)  
Bolivia-Brazil border  
Rio Grande (Bolivia)  
11.00  
x
x
Brazil  
TBG  
Porto Alegre via São Paulo 9.67  
Ban-I Tong (Thai border) 31.24  
Ceyhan  
Asia  
Yadana  
Rest of world  
BTC  
Yadana (Myanmar)  
x
x
Baku (Azerbaijan)  
Baku (Azerbaijan)  
Ras Laffan (Qatar)  
(Turkey, Mediterranean)  
5.00  
10.00  
x
SCP  
Dolphin  
Georgia/Turkey Border  
x
x
(International transport and network)  
U.A.E.  
24.50  
(a) Interest of Total Gabon. The Group has a financial interest of 58.28% in Total Gabon.  
34  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2.2. Gas & Power  
Gas & Power’s primary objective is to contribute to the growth of  
the Group by ensuring sales outlets for its current and future natural  
gas reserves and production.  
two LNG trains, each with a capacity of 5 Mt/y. In 2006,  
TOTAL signed a preliminary agreement with Brass LNG Ltd setting  
forth the principal terms of an LNG purchase agreement for  
approximately one-sixth of the plant’s capacity over a 20-year  
period. This purchase agreement is subject to the final investment  
decision for the project.  
In order to optimize these gas resources, particularly liquefied  
natural gas (LNG), Gas & Power’s activities include the trading and  
marketing of natural gas, liquefied natural gas, liquefied petroleum  
gas (LPG) and electricity as well as shipping. Gas & Power also has  
stakes in infrastructure companies (re-gasification terminals, natural  
gas transport and storage, power plants) necessary to implement  
its strategy.  
In Norway, as part of the Snøhvit project, in which the Group holds  
an 18.4% stake, TOTAL signed in 2004 a purchase agreement for  
0.78 Mt/y of LNG over a 15-year period primarily intended for North  
America and Europe. LNG deliveries started in 2007.  
In addtion, Gas & Power manages a coal business line, handling  
everything from production to marketing.  
In Qatar, TOTAL signed purchase agreements in 2006 for 5.2 Mt/y  
of LNG from train 5 (16.7%) of Qatargas 2 over a 25-year period.  
This LNG is marketed mainly in France, the United Kingdom and  
North America. LNG deliveries started in 2009.  
2.2.1. Liquefied Natural Gas  
In Yemen, TOTAL signed an agreement with Yemen LNG Ltd  
A pioneer in the LNG industry, TOTAL today is one of the world’s  
leading players(1) in the sector and has sound and diversified  
positions both in the upstream and downstream portions of the  
LNG chain. LNG development is key to the Group’s strategy, with  
TOTAL strengthening its positions in most major production zones  
and markets.  
(39.62%) in 2005 to purchase 2 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period,  
initially intended for delivery to the United States and Europe. LNG  
deliveries started in 2009.  
Since 2009, part of the volume purchased by the Group pursuant  
to its long-term contracts related to the LNG projects mentioned  
above has been diverted to markets in Asia.  
Through its stakes in liquefaction plants(2) located in Qatar, the  
United Arab Emirates, Oman, Nigeria, Norway, Yemen and Angola  
and its gas supply agreement with the Bontang LNG plant in  
Indonesia, TOTAL markets LNG in all worldwide markets. The share  
of LNG production sold by TOTAL in 2013 reached 12.3 Mt, an  
increase of over 7% compared to 2012 LNG sales (11.4 Mt).  
This increase was due in particular to the improved performance of  
the Yemen LNG plant in 2013. The Group’s forthcoming liquefaction  
projects, in particular in Australia and Russia, are aimed at  
increasing TOTAL’s share of LNG sold over the coming years.  
The new LNG sources described below are expected to support  
growth of the Group’s LNG portfolio.  
In Australia, TOTAL increased its stake in the Ichthys LNG project  
in early 2013 from 24% to 30%. Launched in early 2012, this  
project calls for the construction of two LNG trains, each with a  
capacity of 4.2 Mt/y. In addition, TOTAL signed in 2011 an LNG  
purchase agreement amounting to 0.9 Mt/y over a 15-year period.  
Deliveries are expected to start in 2017.  
In Russia, TOTAL owns a 20% stake in Yamal LNG, which is  
overseeing a project to develop the South Tambey gas and  
condensates field and build a gas liquefaction plant with three trains  
supporting an LNG production of 16.5 Mt/y. The final investment  
decision was made in December 2013. Concurrently, TOTAL  
signed LNG purchase agreements amounting to 4 Mt/y over a  
Gas & Power is responsible for LNG operations downstream from  
liquefaction plants. It is in charge of marketing LNG on behalf of  
Exploration & Production and developing the Group’s LNG  
downstream portfolio for its trading, marketing and transport  
operations as well as re-gasification terminals.  
24-year period.  
2.2.1.1. Long-term Group LNG purchases  
In the United States, TOTAL entered into an agreement in 2012  
with the South Korean national natural gas company Kogas for the  
purchase of 0.7 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period from train 3 of  
the Sabine Pass gas terminal (Louisiana). Deliveries are expected  
to start in 2017. In parallel to this, TOTAL also entered into an  
agreement with Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC for the purchase of  
2 Mt/y of LNG over a 20-year period from train 5 of the Sabine  
Pass terminal. LNG deliveries will begin on the date on which train  
5 is commissioned, which is scheduled for 2018. This agreement is  
conditional on, among other things, export and construction  
permits being obtained by Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC (which  
owns and operates the terminal) for the construction of train 5 and  
the final investment decision for the project.  
TOTAL acquires long-term LNG volumes most frequently from  
liquefaction plants in which the Group holds a stake. These  
volumes support expansion of the Group’s worldwide LNG  
portfolio.  
In Nigeria, as part of the Nigeria LNG project in which the Group  
has a 15% interest, TOTAL signed an LNG purchase agreement,  
initially intended for deliveries to the United States and Europe, for  
0.23 Mt/y over a 23-year period starting in 2006, to which an  
additional 0.94 Mt/y was added when the sixth train came on  
stream in 2007.  
TOTAL also holds a 17% stake in the Brass LNG project involving  
the ongoing study of a gas liquefaction plant with plans to construct  
(
1) Company data, based on upstream and downstream LNG portfolios in 2013.  
(2) Exploration & Production is in charge of the Group’s natural gas liquefaction and production operations.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
35  
 
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
2
.2.1.2. Long-term Group LNG sales  
the petcoke production of the Port Arthur refinery (United States)  
in 2011.  
TOTAL has signed agreements for the sale of LNG from the  
Group’s global LNG portfolio:  
Gas & Power’s trading teams are located in London, Houston,  
Geneva and Singapore and conduct most of their business through  
the Group’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Total Gas & Power, Total  
Gas & Power North America and Total Gas & Power Asia.  
In China, TOTAL signed an LNG sales agreement with China  
National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC). Under this agreement,  
which became effective in 2010, TOTAL supplies up to 1 Mt/y of  
LNG to CNOOC over a 15-year period.  
2.2.2.1. Gas and electricity  
In South Korea, TOTAL signed an LNG sales agreement in 2011  
with Kogas. Under this agreement, TOTAL will deliver up to 2 Mt/y  
of LNG to Kogas between 2014 and 2031.  
TOTAL has gas and electricity trading operations in Europe and  
North America with a view to selling the Group’s production and  
supplying its gas marketing subsidiaries in addition to supporting  
other Group activities.  
2.2.1.3. LNG shipping  
3
In Europe, TOTAL marketed 1,194 Bcf (33.8 Bm ) of natural gas  
With regard to LNG transport operations, TOTAL has been the  
direct long-term charterer since 2004 of the Arctic Lady, a  
in 2013, including approximately 13.8% coming from the Group’s  
3
production, compared to 1,488 Bcf (42.1 Bm ) in 2012 and  
3
145,000 m LNG vessel that ships TOTAL’s share of production  
3
1
,500 Bcf (42.5 Bm ) in 2011. In addition, TOTAL marketed, mainly  
from the Snøhvit liquefaction plant in Norway. In 2011, TOTAL  
signed a second long-term contract for the chartering of a  
from external resources, 53.0 TWh of electricity in 2013 compared  
to 53.3 TWh in 2012 and 24.2 TWh in 2011.  
3
165,000 m LNG vessel, the Meridian Spirit (former Maersk  
Meridian), in order to strengthen its transport capacities with  
regard to its lifting commitments in Norway.  
In North America, TOTAL marketed from its own production  
3
or external resources 938 Bcf (26.6 Bm ) of natural gas in 2013,  
3
3
compared to 1,256 Bcf (36 Bm ) in 2012 and 1,694 Bcf (48 Bm )  
in 2011.  
The Group is also beginning to develop a fleet. TOTAL signed a long-  
term charter agreement in April 2013 in this regard with SK Shipping  
3
and Marubeni for two 182,000 m vessels. The vessels will serve in  
2.2.2.2. LNG  
fulfilling the purchase agreements of Total Gas & Power, including  
commitments relating to the Ichthys LNG project in Australia and the  
Sabine Pass project in the United States. These tankers, scheduled  
for delivery in 2017, will be among the largest to navigate the  
Panama Canal following its anticipated enlargement in 2015.  
TOTAL has LNG trading operations through spot sales and  
fixed-term contracts as described in section 2.2.1. Since 2009,  
new purchase agreements from the Qatargas 2 and Yemen LNG  
projects and new sale agreements in China, India, Japan and South  
Korea have substantially developed the Group’s LNG marketing  
operations, particularly in Asia’s most buoyant markets. This spot  
and fixed-term LNG portfolio allows TOTAL to supply gas to its  
main customers worldwide, while retaining a sufficient degree of  
flexibility to react to market opportunities.  
As of December 31, 2013, the Group held a 30% stake in  
Gaztransport & Technigaz (GTT), which focuses mainly on the design  
and engineering of membrane cryogenic tanks for LNG tankers.  
At year-end 2013, out of a worldwide tonnage estimated at 369 LNG  
(1)  
vessels , 262 active LNG vessels were equipped with membrane  
tanks built under GTT licenses. TOTAL sold a share of its stake in  
GTT through the initial public offering (IPO) of GTT’s shares on Euronext  
Paris at the end of February 2014. Excluding the over-allotment  
option, TOTAL’s residual stake in GTT is 11.5%.  
In 2013, TOTAL purchased 89 contractual cargoes from Qatar,  
Yemen, Nigeria and Norway and 9 spot cargoes from France,  
Trinidad & Tobago and Nigeria, compared to respectively 87  
and 8 in 2012 and 99 and 10 in 2011.  
2.2.2.3. LPG  
2.2.2. Trading  
TOTAL traded and sold approximately 5.6 Mt of LPG (butane and  
propane) worldwide in 2013, compared to 6 Mt in 2012 and 5.7 Mt  
in 2011. Approximately 23% of these quantities came from fields  
or refineries operated by the Group. LPG trading involved the use  
of 11 time-charters, representing 233 voyages in 2013, and  
approximately 65 spot charters.  
TOTAL continued in 2013 to pursue its strategy of developing  
operations downstream from natural gas and LNG production.  
The aim of this strategy is to optimize access for the Group’s  
current and future production to traditional markets (with long-term  
contracts) and to markets open to international competition (with  
short-term contracts and spot sales). In the context of deregulated  
markets, which allow customers to more freely access suppliers, in  
turn leading to marketing arrangements that are more flexible than  
traditional long-term contracts, TOTAL is developing trading,  
marketing and logistics businesses to offer its natural gas  
and LNG production directly to customers.  
2.2.2.4. Coal  
TOTAL marketed 8.5 Mt of coal in the international market in 2013  
and 2012 compared to 7.5 Mt in 2011. More than 80% of this coal  
came from South Africa. Approximately 60% of the volume was  
sold in Asia, where coal is used primarily to generate electricity.  
The remaining volume was marketed in Europe.  
In parallel, the Group has operations in electricity trading and LPG  
as well as coal marketing. Furthermore, TOTAL began to market  
(1) Gaztransport & Technigaz data.  
36  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Upstream  
2
2
.2.2.5. Petcoke  
2.2.4.1. Natural gas transport, natural gas  
and LPG storage  
TOTAL began to market the petcoke produced by the coker at the  
Port Arthur refinery in 2011. Approximately 1.2 Mt of petcoke was  
sold on the international market in 2013, compared to 1.1 Mt in  
In France, TOTAL, through its 29.5% stake in Géométhane, owns  
natural gas storage in a salt cavern in Manosque with a capacity of  
3
3
2012 and 0.6 Mt in 2011, to cement plants and electricity  
10.5 Bcf (0.3 Bm ). A 7 Bcf (0.2 Bm ) increase in storage capacity  
is scheduled to be commissioned in 2018.  
producers mainly in Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, China, Dominican  
Republic and other Latin American countries.  
TOTAL completed in July 2013 the sale of its subsidiary TIGF  
(Transport Infrastructures Gaz France) to the consortium consisting  
2
.2.3. Marketing  
of Snam, EDF and GIC. TIGF has gas transport activities in  
southwestern France and operates a transport network of  
To unlock value from the Group’s production, TOTAL is developing  
gas, electricity and coal marketing operations with end users in the  
United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany. At the end of 2012,  
the Group enlarged its European marketing coverage by creating  
two marketing affiliates: Total Gas & Power Belgium (formerly  
known as Total Gas & Power North Europe) in Belgium, and  
Total Gas & Power Nederland B.V. in the Netherlands.  
5,000 km of gas pipeline.  
In South America, TOTAL owns interests in several natural gas  
transport companies in Argentina, Chile and Brazil. These assets  
represent a total integrated network of approximately 9,500 km  
of pipelines serving the Argentinean, Chilean and Brazilian markets  
from gas-producing basins in Bolivia and Argentina, where the  
Group has natural gas reserves. These natural gas transport  
companies face a difficult operational and financial environment in  
Argentina stemming from the absence of an increase in transport  
tariffs and restrictions imposed on gas exports. However,  
GasAndes, a company in which TOTAL holds a 56.5% stake,  
successfully negotiated new contracts with all its customers.  
These two subsidiaries started their operations in 2013.  
In the United Kingdom, TOTAL markets gas and electricity to the  
industrial and commercial segments through its subsidiary Total  
Gas & Power Ltd. In 2013, volumes of gas sold amounted to  
3
3
1
1
4
42 Bcf (4.0 Bm ), compared to 146 Bcf (4.2 Bm ) in 2012 and  
62 Bcf (4.6 Bm ) in 2011. Sales of electricity totaled approximately  
.7 TWh in 2013, compared to 3.9 TWh in 2012 and 4.1 TWh  
3
In India, TOTAL holds a 50% stake in South Asian LPG Limited  
(SALPG), a company that operates an underground import and  
storage LPG terminal located on the east coast of the country. This  
cavern, the first of its kind in India, has a storage capacity of 60 kt.  
In 2013, inbound vessels transported 940 kt of LPG, compared to  
in 2011.  
In France, TOTAL markets natural gas through its subsidiary  
Total Energie Gaz (TEGAZ), the overall sales of which were 141 Bcf  
3
3
(4.0 Bm ) in 2013, compared to 176 Bcf (5 Bm ) in 2012 and  
950 kt in 2012 and 850 kt in 2011.  
3
208 Bcf (5.9 Bm ) in 2011. The Group also markets coal to its  
French customers through its subsidiary CDF Energie, with sales  
of approximately 0.81 Mt in 2013, compared to 0.97 Mt in 2012  
and 1.2 Mt in 2011.  
2
.2.4.2. LNG re-gasification  
TOTAL has entered into agreements to obtain long-term access  
to LNG re-gasification capacity on the three continents that are the  
largest consumers of natural gas: North America (United States  
and Mexico), Europe (France and the United Kingdom), and Asia  
In Spain, TOTAL markets natural gas to the industrial and  
commercial segments through Cepsa Gas Comercializadora,  
in which it holds a 35% stake. Volumes of gas sold amounted  
(India). This diversified presence allows the Group to access new  
3
to 101 Bcf (2.9 Bm ) in 2013 and 2012 compared to 85 Bcf  
liquefaction projects by becoming a long-term buyer of a portion  
of the LNG produced at these plants, thereby strengthening its  
LNG supply portfolio.  
3
(
2.4 Bm ) in 2011.  
In Germany, Total Energie Gas GmbH, marketing subsidiary of  
3
TOTAL created in 2010, marketed 76 Bcf (2.2 Bm ) of gas in 2013  
In France, TOTAL holds a 27.54% stake in the company Fosmax  
and has, through its subsidiary Total Gas & Power Ltd., a re-gasification  
capacity of 79 Bcf/y (2.25 Bm /y). The terminal received fifty-three  
to industrial and commercial customers, compared to 5 Bcf  
3
(
0.15 Bm ) in 2012.  
3
The Group also holds stakes in the marketing companies that are  
associated with the Altamira and Hazira LNG re-gasification  
terminals located in Mexico and India, respectively.  
vessels in 2013, compared to fifty-six in 2012 and fifty-nine in 2011.  
In 2011, TOTAL acquired a 9.99% stake in Dunkerque LNG in order  
to develop a methane terminal project with a capacity of 459 Bcf/y  
3
(
13 Bm /y). Trade agreements have also been signed that allow  
3
2.2.4. Gas facilities  
TOTAL to reserve up to 2 Bm /y of re-gasification capacity over a  
20-year period. The project is underway and commissioning of the  
TOTAL develops natural gas transport networks, gas storage  
facilities (both liquid and gaseous) and LNG re-gasification terminals  
downstream from its natural gas and LNG production.  
terminal is scheduled for the end of 2015.  
In the United Kingdom, through its equity interest in the Qatargas 2  
project, TOTAL holds an 8.35% stake in the South Hook LNG  
re-gasification terminal with a total capacity of 742 Bcf/y (21 Bm /y)  
3
and an equivalent right of use to the terminal. In 2013, the terminal  
re-gasified fifty-two cargoes, compared to sixty-eight in 2012 and  
nearly one hundred in 2011.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
37  
Business overview  
2
Upstream  
In Mexico, TOTAL sold in 2011 its entire stake in the Altamira  
In Nigeria, TOTAL and its partner, the state-owned Nigerian  
National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), own interests in two  
gas-fired power plant projects that are part of the government’s  
objectives to develop power generation and increase the share  
of natural gas production for domestic use:  
re-gasification terminal, but it retained a 25% reservation of the  
3
terminal’s capacity (59 Bcf/y or 1.7 Bm /y) through its 25% stake  
in Gas del Litoral.  
In the United States, TOTAL has reserved a re-gasification  
3
capacity of approximately 353 Bcf/y (10 Bm /y) at the Sabine Pass  
– the Afam VI power plant, part of the Shell Petroleum  
Development Company (SPDC) joint venture in which TOTAL  
holds a 10% stake, is a 630 MW combined-cycle power plant  
that has been in operation since the end of 2010; and  
terminal (Louisiana) for a 20-year period ending in 2029. In 2012,  
the Sabine Pass terminal received the authorization to export LNG  
from four liquefaction trains, which involves converting the re-  
gasification plants into liquefaction plants. As a result, TOTAL  
negotiated financial compensation with Cheniere, the terminal’s  
operator, in relation to the commissioning of the successive  
liquefaction trains.  
the potential development of a new 417 MW combined-cycle  
power plant near the city of Obite (Niger Delta) in connection  
with the OML 58 gas project (40%, operator).  
In Thailand, TOTAL owns 28% of Eastern Power and Electric  
Company Ltd, which operates the combined-cycle gas power plant  
in Bang Bo that has a capacity of 350 MW and has been in  
operation since 2003. The plant’s production is sold to the  
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand under a long-term  
agreement.  
In India, TOTAL holds a 26% stake in the Hazira terminal, where  
the natural gas re-gasification capacity was increased in 2013  
3
to 244 Bcf/y (6.9 Bm /y). The terminal, located on the west coast  
of India in the Gujarat state, is a merchant terminal with operations  
that cover both LNG re-gasification and gas marketing.  
Due to the Indian market’s strong prospects for growth, a potential  
expansion project is under study to increase the terminal’s capacity  
3
to 343 Bcf/y (9.7 Bm /y) by 2018.  
2.2.6. Coal production  
For nearly thirty years, TOTAL, through its subsidiary Total Coal  
South Africa (TCSA), has produced and exported coal from South  
Africa primarily to Europe and Asia. In 2013, TCSA produced  
2
.2.5. Electricity generation  
In a context of increasing global demand for electricity, TOTAL has  
developed expertise in the power generation sector, especially  
through cogeneration and combined-cycle power plant projects.  
4.3 Mt of coal.  
TCSA owns and operates five mines in South Africa and continues  
to study other projects aimed at developing its mining resources.  
In Abu Dhabi, the Taweelah A1 power plant, which is owned by  
Gulf Total Tractebel Power Cy (20%), combines electricity  
generation and water desalination. The plant, in operation since  
The South African coal produced by TCSA or bought from  
third-parties’ mines is either marketed locally or exported through  
the port of Richard’s Bay, in which TCSA holds a 4.8% interest.  
2003, currently has a net power generation capacity of 1,600 MW  
3
and a water desalination capacity of 385,000 m per day. The  
plant’s production is sold to Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity  
Company (ADWEC) as part of a long-term agreement.  
38  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Refining & Chemicals  
2
3. Refining & Chemicals segment  
The Refining & Chemicals segment constitutes a large industrial group that encompasses refining, petrochemicals, and specialty chemicals  
operations. This segment created on January 1, 2012(1), following the reorganization of the Downstream and Chemical segments, also  
includes Trading & Shipping activities.  
Among the world’s  
ten largest  
Refining capacity  
of approximately  
at year-end 2013  
One of the leading  
2
Mb/d traders of oil and refined 2billion 51,406  
integrated producers (  
2)  
products worldwide  
invested in 2013  
employees  
Refinery throughput  
1,863  
1,786  
1,719  
1
,617  
1
,523  
1,444  
In 2013, refinery throughput decreased by 4% compared to 2012,  
reflecting essentially a turnaround at the Antwerp refinery, higher  
maintenance at the Donges refinery, voluntary shutdowns in  
response to weak refining margins in late 2013, and the closure  
of the Rome refinery at the end of the third quarter 2012.  
Europe  
Rest of  
World  
2
46  
263  
275  
(in kb/d)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Refining & Chemicals segment financial data  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non-Group sales  
86,204  
1,329  
1,404  
440  
91,117  
1,455  
1,376  
383  
77,146  
609  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
including Specialty Chemicals  
842  
424  
(a) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
For 2013, the ERMI was 17.9 $/t, a decrease of 50% compared  
to 2012. Petrochemical margins remained at high levels, particularly  
in the United States.  
the implementation of planned synergies and operational  
efficiencies and to a more favorable environment for petrochemicals  
that offset the sharp decline in European refining margins.  
For the full-year 2013, adjusted net operating income from the  
Refining & Chemicals segment was 1,404 M, compared to  
In addition, the SATORP integrated refinery in Saudi Arabia has  
begun to export refined products after the successful start-up  
of its first units.  
1,376 M in 2012 and 842 M in 2011. Expressed in dollars,  
adjusted net operating income was 1.9 B$, an increase of 5%  
compared to 2012, despite the 50% decrease in refining margins.  
The increase was due in part to the tangible results realized from  
The ROACE (3) for the Refining & Chemicals segment was 9% for  
the full-year 2013, stable compared to the full-year 2012.  
(
(
(
1) As a result of the reorganization, certain information has been restated.  
2) Based on publicly available information, 2012 consolidated sales.  
3) Calculated based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed, using replacement cost.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
39  
Business overview  
2
Refining & Chemicals  
3.1. Refining & Chemicals  
Refining & Chemicals includes the Group’s refining, petrochemicals  
and specialty chemicals businesses. The petrochemicals business  
includes base petrochemicals (olefins and aromatics) and polymer  
derivatives (polyethylene, polypropylene and polystyrene).  
The specialty chemicals business includes elastomer processing,  
adhesives and electroplating chemistry. The volume of its  
The petrochemicals businesses are located mainly in Europe,  
the United States, Qatar, South Korea and Saudi Arabia. Most  
of these sites are either adjacent or connected by pipelines to  
Group refineries. As a result, TOTAL’s petrochemical operations  
are integrated within its refining operations.  
The year 2013 saw the startup of the first production at the SATORP  
refinery in Saudi Arabia. Through this project, approved in 2009, the  
Group holds a stake, alongside Saudi Aramco, in one of the most  
competitive refining & petrochemicals platforms in the world.  
Refining & Chemicals activities places TOTAL among the top ten  
integrated chemical producers in the world(1)  
.
Against the backdrop of rising worldwide demand for oil and  
petrochemicals driven by non-OECD countries, the strategy  
of Refining & Chemicals, in addition to the priority given to safety  
and environmental protection, involves:  
TOTAL also announced in 2013 a major investment program to  
modernize the platform in Antwerp, Belgium, and a project to adapt  
the petrochemicals platform in Carling, France, with the goal of  
restoring competitiveness by 2016.  
adapting production capacity to changes in demand in Europe  
by concentrating investments on integrated platforms;  
In 2011, TOTAL closed the sale to IPIC of its 48.83% stake in CEPSA  
as part of a public takeover bid on the entire share capital of CEPSA.  
With respect to refining operations, this sale concerned mainly four  
Spanish refineries (Huelva, Algeciras, Tenerife, Tarragona) and, with  
respect to petrochemicals operations, aromatics and their derivatives.  
consolidating industrial means of production and the search  
for opportunities for growth in the United States; and  
strengthening TOTAL’s positions in Asia and the Middle East,  
in particular to gain access to advantaged oil and gas resources  
and to benefit from growth in the markets.  
3.1.1.1. Europe  
This strategy is underpinned by an effort to differentiate through  
the technology used and innovation found in its products and  
processes, and involves pursuing asset portfolio management  
to focus on core businesses.  
(
4)  
TOTAL is the largest refiner in Western Europe .  
In Western Europe, TOTAL’s refining capacity was 1,736 kb/d  
at year-end 2013, compared to 1,742 kb/d at year-end 2012 and  
1
,787 kb/d at year-end 2011, accounting for 85% of the Group’s  
Since 2012, Refining & Chemicals has launched a comprehensive  
program to improve operational efficiency and to generate synergies  
between its refining and petrochemicals activities. In particular,  
four industrial priorities were set for the Refining & Chemicals activities:  
safety, availability of facilities, cost controls and energy efficiency.  
These action plans, combined with the development projects on  
its major integrated platforms and the growth of specialty chemicals,  
should improve the profitability of operations by making the most  
of Refining & Petrochemicals’ assets.  
overall refining capacity. The decrease in 2012 was due primarily  
to the shutdown of the Rome refinery. The Group operates eight  
refineries in Western Europe (one in Antwerp, Belgium, five in  
France in Donges, Feyzin, Gonfreville, Grandpuits and La Mède,  
one in Immingham in the United Kingdom and one in Leuna,  
Germany) and owns stakes in the Schwedt refinery in Germany,  
the Zeeland refinery in the Netherlands and the Trecate refinery  
in Italy through its interest in TotalErg.  
The Group’s main petrochemical sites are located in Belgium,  
in Antwerp (steam crackers, aromatics, polyethylene) and Feluy  
In June 2013, TOTAL completed the divestment of its Fertilizers  
activity (Base Chemicals) in Europe, mainly through the sale of its  
shares in GPN S.A. (100%), France’s leading producer of nitrogen  
(polyolefins, polystyrene), and in France, in Carling (steam cracker,  
aromatics, polyethylene, polystyrene), Feyzin (steam cracker,  
aromatics), Gonfreville (steam crackers, aromatics, styrene,  
polyolefins, polystyrene) and Lavéra (steam cracker, aromatics,  
polypropylene). Europe accounts for 54% of the Group’s petro-  
chemicals capacity, i.e., 10,899 kt at year-end 2013 compared  
to 11,803 kt at year-end 2012 and 11,013 kt at year-end 2011.  
The decrease in 2013 was due essentially to the closure of one  
steam cracker in Antwerp. The increase in 2012 was due mainly  
to the acquisition of 35% of Fina Antwerp Olefins.  
fertilizers, and in the Belgian company Rosier S.A. (56.86%)(2)  
.
3.1.1. Refining & Petrochemicals  
TOTAL’s refining capacity was 2,042 kb/d as of December 31,  
013, compared to 2,048 kb/d at year-end 2012 and 2,096 kb/d  
at year-end 2011. The Group’s worldwide refined products sales  
including trading operations) in 2013 were 3,418 kb/d, compared  
2
(
to 3,403 kb/d in 2012 and 3,639 kb/d in 2011.  
In France, the Group owns five refineries and continues to adapt  
its refining capacities by shifting the production emphasis to  
diesel and improving operational efficiency against the backdrop  
of a structural decline in the demand for petroleum products  
in Europe and an increase in gasoline surpluses.  
TOTAL has equity stakes in twenty-one refineries (including nine  
that it operates), located in Europe, the United States, the French  
West Indies, Africa, the Middle East and China.  
Refining & Chemicals sector manages the refining operations  
located in Europe (excluding the joint venture TotalErg in Italy), the  
United States, the Middle East and Asia, with a capacity of 1,953  
kb/d at year-end 2013 (i.e., 96% of the Group’s total capacity(3)).  
The Group has been implementing its industrial plan intended to  
reconfigure the Gonfreville refinery in Normandy, France, since 2009.  
(
(
1) Based on publicly available information, production capacities at year-end 2012.  
2) The divestment did not include TOTAL’s interest in Grande Paroisse S.A., through which TOTAL has retained all liabilities related to the former activities of Grande Paroisse, and in  
particular those related to the AZF site in Toulouse.  
3) Earnings related to the refining assets in Africa, the French West Indies and the TotalErg joint venture are reported in the results of the Marketing & Services segment.  
(
(4) Based on publicly available information, 2012 refining capacities and quantities sold.  
40  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Refining & Chemicals  
2
The project is intended to upgrade the refinery and shift the  
production emphasis to diesel. For this purpose, the investments  
resulted in reducing the annual distillation capacity to 12 Mt  
from 16 Mt, upsizing the hydrocracker unit for heavy diesel cuts  
and improving energy efficiency by lowering carbon dioxide  
emissions. Most of the new configuration was rolled out at  
the beginning of 2013 after a major complete shutdown of the  
refinery. The complete project is expected to be finalized by  
mid-2014 with the startup of a new diesel desulfurization unit.  
3.1.1.2. North America  
The Group’s main sites are located in Texas, in Port Arthur (refinery,  
steam cracker), Bayport (polyethylene) and La Porte (polypropylene),  
and in Louisiana, in Carville (styrene, polystyrene).  
In 2011, TOTAL completed a program to upgrade the Port Arthur  
refinery that included the construction of a desulfurization unit, a  
vacuum distillation unit, a deep-conversion unit (or coker) and other  
associated units. This modernization allows the refinery to process  
more heavy and high-sulfur crudes and to increase production of  
lighter products, in particular low-sulfur distillates.  
In parallel, the project to modernize the Normandy platform’s  
petrochemical operations was completed in early 2012. This  
project improved the energy efficiency of the steam cracker  
and the high-density polyethylene unit.  
TOTAL and BASF purchased in 2011 Shell’s stakes in Sabina, a  
butane processing plant, which they transferred to BTP (40%), their  
joint subsidiary that owns the Port Arthur steam cracker. This new  
structure increases synergies between the refinery and the steam  
cracker, which are located on the same site in Port Arthur.  
In petrochemicals, the Group announced in September 2013  
an investment plan for the Carling platform in Lorraine, France,  
to adapt its capacity and restore its competitiveness. The project  
provides for the development of new hydrocarbon resin and  
polymer production activities and the shutdown of the steam  
cracking activity in the second half of 2015.  
Furthermore, as a result of the investment made to adapt its furnaces,  
the BTP cracker has, since April 2013, been able to produce almost  
40% of its ethylene from ethane and 40% from butane and propane,  
which allows it to benefit from favorable market conditions in the  
United States. The ongoing construction of a new ethane-burning  
furnace will increase the steam cracker’s production capacity by  
almost 15% in 2014.  
In Belgium, the Group announced in May 2013 the launch of  
a major project to modernize its Antwerp platform. This project  
consists of two parts:  
-
the construction of new conversion units in response to the  
shift in demand towards lighter oil products with a very low  
sulfur content; and  
3.1.1.3. Asia and the Middle East  
-
the construction of a new unit to convert the gases recovered  
from the refining process into raw materials for petrochemical  
units.  
TOTAL is continuing to expand in growth areas and is developing  
sites in countries with favorable access to raw materials.  
In Saudi Arabia, the joint venture Saudi Aramco Total Refining and  
Petrochemical Company (SATORP) was created in 2008 by TOTAL  
(37.5%) and Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabian Oil Company, 62.5%) in  
order to build a 400 kb/d refinery in Jubail. Saudi Aramco plans to  
retain a 37.5% interest, with the remaining 25% expected to be  
listed on the Saudi stock exchange. Most of the different units of  
SATORP were gradually commissioned in 2013 and the commercial  
exports of petroleum products started in September 2013. All the  
refining and petrochemicals units should be operational by the end  
of first quarter 2014. Production is expected to reach full capacity  
around mid-2014.  
The modernization plan also provides for the shutdown of two  
of the site’s oldest production units: one steam cracker in 2013,  
and a polyethylene production line by the end of 2014.  
TOTAL built a new unit in Feluy that is starting up in 2014 in order  
to produce latest-generation expansible polystyrene for the fast-  
growing insulation market.  
Moreover, in 2012, TOTAL acquired 35% of Fina Antwerp Olefins,  
Europe’s second largest base petrochemicals (monomers)  
production plant(1)  
.
− In the United Kingdom, the commissioning in 2011 of the  
The configuration of this refinery is designed for processing  
heavy crudes produced in Saudi Arabia and selling fuels and other  
light products that meet strict specifications and that are mainly  
intended for export. The refinery is also integrated with the  
petrochemical units: a 700 kt/y paraxylene unit, a 200 kt/y  
propylene unit, and a 140 kt/y benzene unit.  
hydrodesulfurization (HDS) unit at the Lindsey refinery allowed  
the refinery to increase its crude processing flexibility (up to 70%  
of high-sulfur crudes, compared to 10% previously) and its  
low-sulfur diesel production.  
In 2013, TOTAL decided to shut down its 70 kt/year polystyrene  
production site at Stalybridge, while continuing its commercial  
activity for polymers in the United Kingdom.  
In China, TOTAL holds a 22.4% stake in WEPEC, a company  
that operates a refinery located in Dalian and that also produces  
polypropylene.  
In Italy, TotalErg (49%) holds a 24.45% stake in the Trecate  
refinery. The Rome refinery, which was wholly-owned by TotalErg,  
was turned into a depot in 2012.  
The Group is also active through its polystyrene plant in Foshan  
(Guangzhou region), the capacity of which doubled to 200 kt/y  
at the beginning of 2011. A new polystyrene compounds unit  
started up on this site in the first quarter of 2013. TOTAL began  
the construction of a new 200 kt/y polystyrene plant in Ningbo  
in the Shanghai region, with production scheduled to start up  
in the second half of 2014.  
(1) Based on publicly available information, production capacities at year-end 2012.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
41  
Business overview  
2
Refining & Chemicals  
In South Korea, TOTAL holds a 50% stake in Samsung Total  
Petrochemicals Co., Ltd., which operates the petrochemical site  
located in Daesan (condensate splitter, steam cracker, styrene,  
paraxylene, polyolefins). The joint venture completed in mid-2011  
the first debottlenecking phase of the units at the Daesan site in  
order to bring them to full capacity. This first phase included  
increasing the capacity of the steam cracker to 1,000 kt/y and  
the polyolefin units to 1,150 kt/y. A second phase took place  
in September 2012 and involved increasing the capacity of the  
paraxylene unit to 700 kt/y.  
In Qatar, the Group holds interests(2) in two ethane-based steam  
crackers (Qapco, RLOC) and four polyethylene lines (Qapco, Qatofin),  
including the linear low-density polyethylene plant with a capacity  
of 450 kt/y operated by Qatofin in Messaied and a new 300 kt/y  
low-density polyethylene line operated by Qapco, which started  
up in 2012.  
TOTAL holds a 10% stake in the Ras Laffan condensate refinery,  
which has a capacity of 146 kb/d. Plans to double the refinery’s  
capacity were approved in April 2013 and are expected to be  
completed in 2016. The project also includes the construction  
of a new diesel hydrogenation unit scheduled to come on-stream  
in 2014.  
In addition, to keep up with growth in the Asian markets, two  
major projects are under construction for planned start-up in 2014:  
a new 240 kt/y EVA(1) unit and a new aromatic unit with a capacity  
of 1.5 Mt/y of paraxylene and benzene, the raw material of which  
will be supplied by a new condensate splitter that will also produce  
kerosene (1.5 Mt/y) and diesel (1.0 Mt/y). As a result, the site’s  
paraxylene production capacity will be increased to 1.8 Mt/y.  
Together, these projects are expected to double the production  
capacity of the site between 2011 and 2015.  
3.1.1.4. Crude oil refining capacity  
The table below sets forth TOTAL’s daily crude oil refining capacity(3)  
:
As of December 31,  
(kb/d)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Nine refineries operated by Group companies  
Normandy (100%)  
Provence (100%)  
Donges (100%)  
Feyzin (100%)  
Grandpuits (100%)  
Antwerp (100%)  
Leuna (100%)  
Lindsey-Immingham (100%)  
Port-Arthur (100%)  
247  
153  
219  
109  
101  
338  
227  
207  
169  
247  
153  
219  
109  
101  
338  
227  
207  
169  
247  
153  
219  
109  
101  
338  
227  
207  
169  
Subtotal  
1,770  
272  
1,770  
278  
1,770  
326  
Other refineries in which the Group has equity stakes(a)  
Total  
2,042  
2,048  
2,096  
(
a) TOTAL’s share in the eleven refineries in which TOTAL has equity stakes ranging from 10% to 55% (one in the Netherlands, in Germany, in China, in Qatar, in Italy and in Martinique  
and five in Africa). Rome refinery shutdown in 2012. The SATORP platform at Jubail in Saudi Arabia (TOTAL, 37.5%), that was in the process of starting up on December 31, 2013,  
was not taken into account in the above table of capacities. In 2014, once entirely operational, TOTAL’s share of capacity in the refinery will be 145 kb/d.  
3.1.1.5. Refined products  
(a)  
The table below sets forth by product category TOTAL’s net share of refined quantities produced at the Group’s refineries :  
(kb/d)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Gasoline  
340  
146  
739  
133  
322  
351  
153  
734  
160  
338  
350  
158  
804  
179  
335  
Aviation fuel(b)  
Diesel and heating oils  
Heavy fuels  
Other products  
Total  
1,680  
1,736  
1,826  
(
(
a) For refineries not 100% owned by TOTAL, the production shown is TOTAL’s equity share of the site’s overall production.  
b) Avgas, jet fuel and kerosene.  
(
(
(
1) Ethylene and vinyl acetate copolymers.  
2) TOTAL interests: Qapco (20%); Qatofin (49%); Ras Laffan Olefin Cracker (22.5%).  
3) Capacity data based on refinery process unit stream-day capacities under normal operating conditions, less the impact of shutdown for regular repair and maintenance activities averaged  
over an extended period of time.  
42  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Refining & Chemicals  
2
3.1.1.6. Utilization rate  
The tables below set forth the utilization rate of the Group’s refineries:  
On crude and other feedstock(a)(b)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
France  
78%  
87%  
100%  
75%  
82%  
88%  
99%  
67%  
75%  
91%  
78%  
81%  
67%  
80%  
Rest of Europe(c)  
Americas  
Asia and Middle East  
Africa  
78%  
Average  
84%  
86%  
83%  
(a) Including equity share of refineries in which the Group has a stake.  
(b) Crude + crackers’ feedstock/distillation capacity at the beginning of the year.  
(c) Including CEPSA (for first seven months of 2011) and TotalErg.  
On crude(a)(b)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Average  
80%  
82%  
78%  
(
(
a) Including equity share of refineries in which the Group has a stake.  
b) Crude/distillation capacity at the beginning of the year.  
NB: Ras Laffan refinery contribution (Middle East) included in above utilization rates from 2013.  
3.1.1.7. Petrochemicals: breakdown of TOTAL’s main production capacities  
As of December 31,  
(in thousands of tons)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Europe  
North  
America  
Asia and  
Worldwide  
Worldwide  
Worldwide  
Middle East(  
a)  
Olefins(b)  
4,939  
2,893  
1,200  
1,345  
522  
1,295  
1,512  
445  
1,200  
700  
1,420  
1,230  
644  
350  
308  
7,654  
5,635  
2,289  
2,895  
1,530  
63  
8,039  
5,795  
2,239  
2,875  
1,595  
358  
7,097  
5,730  
2,094  
2,835  
1,555  
358  
Aromatics(c)  
Polyethylene  
Polypropylene  
Polystyrene  
Other(d)  
-
-
63  
Total  
10,899  
5,152  
4,014  
20,065  
20,900  
19,668  
(
a) Including interests in Qatar and 50% of Samsung Total Petrochemicals Co., Ltd. capacities. The SATORP platform at Jubail in Saudi Arabia (TOTAL, 37.5%), that was in the process  
of starting up on December 31, 2013, was not taken into account in the above table of capacities. In 2014, once entirely operational, TOTAL’s share of capacity in the plant will be  
3
90 kt (75 kt of olefins and 315 kt of aromatics).  
(
(
(
b) Ethylene, propylene and butadiene.  
c) Including Monomer Styrene.  
d) Mainly Monoethylene Glycol (MEG) and Cyclohexane.  
3
.1.1.8. Development of new avenues for the  
3.1.1.8.2. Coal to polymers  
production of fuels and polymers  
TOTAL has developed know-how in the various processes used to  
convert coal into higher value products by gasification. These efforts  
allow a better understanding of the technological issues specific to  
each process, such as Fischer-Tropsch, methanol, di-methyl ether  
(DME) and methane, particularly in terms of energy optimization,  
water consumption and carbon capture.  
In addition to optimizing existing processes, TOTAL is exploring new  
ways for valorizing carbon resources, conventional or otherwise  
(natural gas, coal, biomass, waste). A number of innovative projects  
are being examined that entail defining access to the resource (nature,  
location, supply method, transport), the nature of the molecules  
and target markets (fuels, lubricants, petrochemicals, specialty  
chemicals), and the most appropriate, efficient and environmentally-  
friendly conversion processes.  
TOTAL is studying a coal to olefin (CTO) conversion project in  
partnership with the China Power Investment utility company that  
would be located in Inner Mongolia (China). This 800 kt/y olefins project  
would use the innovative Methanol-to-Olefins process (MTO/OCP),  
which has been successfully tested in 2013 on a demonstration  
unit at Feluy, Belgium. Following the approval from the Chinese  
authorities in November 2013, a detailed study has been launched.  
3.1.1.8.1. Natural gas to liquids  
TOTAL continues to develop its know-how in the conversion of  
natural gas to fuel. For large-scale projects (more than 10 kboe/d),  
TOTAL is consolidating its know-how in the most efficient conversion  
processes and is contributing to the development of innovative  
solutions, in particular by developing new Fischer-Tropsch catalysts.  
TOTAL is also conducting research into small-scale concepts,  
such as torched gas solutions.  
In parallel, TOTAL is pursuing a program to develop new carbon  
capture and storage technologies in order to reduce the environmental  
footprint of the Group’s industrial projects based on fossil energy.  
In partnership with the IFP Énergies Nouvelles (French Institute for  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
43  
Business overview  
2
Refining & Chemicals  
Oil and Alternative Energies), TOTAL is involved in an R&D program  
related to chemical looping combustion, an innovative process  
to burn solid and gas feedstock that includes carbon capture at  
a very low energy cost. In 2010, this partnership resulted in the  
construction of a pilot at the Solaize site in France.  
3.1.3.1. Elastomer processing  
Hutchinson manufactures and markets products derived from  
elastomer processing that are principally intended for the automotive,  
aerospace and defense industries.  
Among the industry’s leaders worldwide(6), Hutchinson provides  
its customers with innovative solutions in the areas of fluid transfer,  
air and fluid seals, anti-vibration, sound and thermal insulation,  
and transmission and mobility.  
3.1.1.8.3. Biomass to polymers  
TOTAL is involved in the development of processes dedicated or  
related to the conversion of biomass to polymers. The main area  
of focus is the development of a polylactic acid (PLA) production  
technology through Futerro, a joint venture with Galactic, a lactic  
acid producer, as well as developing a technology for dehydration  
of bio-alcohols into olefins (monomers for the manufacture of large  
conventional polymers), in collaboration with IFPen/Axens.  
Hutchinson has eighty-four production sites worldwide, including  
fifty-six in Europe, seventeen in North America, six in Asia, four in  
South America and one in Africa.  
Hutchinson’s sales in 2013 were 3.28 billion, up 3% compared  
to 2012. Despite the difficulties experienced by the European  
automotive sector, sales for the automotive business increased by  
3.1.1.8.4. Biomass to fuels  
5% due to the growth of the Asian and North American markets  
TOTAL is a member of the BioTFuel consortium, the objective  
of which is to develop a chain for converting lignocellulose into  
fungible, sulfur-free liquid products through gasification and  
synthesis using the Fischer-Tropsch process. To benefit from  
economies of scale, it is envisaged to convert lignocellulosic  
feedstock into a blend with fossil resources. This development  
involves an initial pilot demonstration phase.  
and increased market share in Europe. On the industrial markets,  
sales increased by 1%, mainly due to the increased sales on the  
civil aerospace that offset contraction of the defense markets.  
To strengthen its position in the aerospace industry, Hutchinson  
acquired Kaefer in 2011, a German company specializing in aircraft  
interior equipment (e.g., insulation, ventilation ducts) and the Canadian  
company Marquez specializing in air-conditioning circuits at the end  
of 2012. In the automotive sector, Hutchinson acquired Keum-Ah  
in 2011, a South Korean company specializing in fluid transfer systems.  
Hutchinson closed the Oyartzun production plant in Spain at the  
end of 2012.  
In 2013, the Group incorporated:  
1)  
In gasoline, 549 kt of ethanol( at its European refineries and  
several oil depots(2), compared to 531 kt in 2012 and 494 kt  
in 2011(3) ; and  
In July 2013, Hutchinson divested 30% of its automobile brake  
hose business in Spain (Palamos) through the creation of a joint  
venture with Japanese company Nichirin, one of the world leaders  
in this segment. Elsewhere, in July 2013, Hutchinson acquired  
Gasket International, a company based in Italy and China, which  
specializes in the production of sealing parts for valves for the oil  
and gas industry.  
(4)  
In diesel, 1,951 kt of VOME at its European refineries and several  
(5) (3)  
oil depots , compared to 1,927 kt in 2012 and 1,859 kt in 2011 .  
3
.1.2. Specialty Chemicals  
The specialty chemicals businesses include elastomer processing  
Hutchinson), adhesives (Bostik) and electroplating chemistry  
Atotech). They serve the automotive, construction, electronics,  
aerospace and convenience goods markets, for which marketing,  
innovation and customer service are key drivers. TOTAL markets  
specialty products in more than sixty countries and intends to  
develop by combining organic growth and targeted acquisitions.  
This development is focused on high-growth markets and the  
marketing of innovative products with high added value that  
meet the Group’s Sustainable Development approach.  
(
(
Hutchinson continues to develop in strong growth potential  
markets and among the most dynamic and strongest customers.  
Hutchinson continuously strives to innovate, offering its customers  
high-performance materials and high-value added solutions  
capable of performing the most demanding functions.  
3.1.3.2. Adhesives  
Bostik is one of the world leaders in the adhesive sector and has  
significant positions on the industrial, hygiene and construction  
markets, complemented by both consumer and professional  
distribution channels.  
In 2013, consolidated worldwide sales of specialty chemicals  
activities (excluding Resins) totaled 5.7 billion, stable compared  
to 2012 and up 7% compared to 2011.  
The Cray Valley coating resins and Sartomer photocure resins  
businesses were divested in 2011. However, the structural and  
hydrocarbon resins business lines were kept and have been  
incorporated into the Polymer division.  
Bostik has forty-six production sites worldwide, including  
eighteen in Europe, nine in North America, eight in Asia, six in  
Australia-New Zealand, three in South America and two in Africa.  
(
1) Including ethanol from ETBE (Ethyl-tertio-butyl-ether) and biomethanol from bio-MTBE (Methyl-tertio-butyl-ether), expressed in ethanol equivalent.  
Reference for bio content of ETBE and bio-MTBE is the RED directive.  
2) PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share).  
3) PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share). TotalErg (100% JV) included.  
4) VOME: Vegetable-Oil-Methyl-Ester. Including HVO (Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil).  
5) Including TotalErg’s Rome and Trecate refinery/depots and TotalErg depots in Italy (100% TotalErg). PCK and Zeeland Refinery included (TOTAL share).  
(
(
(
(
(6) Based on publicly available information, 2013 consolidated sales.  
44  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Refining & Chemicals  
2
Sales were 1.51 billion in 2013, a decrease of 3% compared to 2012.  
Atotech has seventeen production sites worldwide, including seven in  
Asia, six in Europe, three in North America and one in South America.  
Bostik continues to strengthen its technological positions in the  
construction and industrial sectors, pursue its program for  
differentiation focused mainly on an offering of innovative bonding  
solutions, continue its expansion in high-growth countries and  
improve its operational performance.  
Sales totaled 0.89 billion in 2013, a decrease of 8% compared to  
2012, mainly due to the slump in the sales of electroplating equipment  
and the divestment of a commodities reselling activities (anodes).  
In 2013, Atotech successfully continued to pursue its strategy  
designed to differentiate its products through a comprehensive  
service provided to its customers in terms of equipment,  
processes, design and chemical products and through the  
development of green, innovative technologies to reduce the  
environmental footprint. This strategy relies on global coverage  
provided by its technical centers located near customers.  
Consequently, following the start-up of a new production unit in  
Egypt and the opening of a new technology center for Asia in  
Shanghai in 2012, Bostik inaugurated in 2013 a new production  
unit in Changshu, China, which will ultimately become Bostik’s  
largest production plant in the world.  
Bostik continued to rationalize its industrial base in 2013 with  
the shutdown of production in Dublin, Ireland, Barcelona, Spain,  
Lisbon, Portugal and Zhuhai, China. A workshop was also shut  
down in Leicester, United Kingdom.  
In order to strengthen its position in the electronics market,  
Atotech started up a new production unit in 2011 aimed at the  
semiconductors market in Neuruppin (Germany) and acquired  
adhesive technologies (molecular interfaces) in the nanotechnology  
sector in the United States. In addition, a new equipment production  
site is expected to be opened in China in the third quarter of 2014.  
Finally, in 2013, Bostik launched its new visual identity, designed  
to transform Bostik into a more visible worldwide brand that will  
gradually replace some forty local brands.  
Atotech intends to continue to develop in Asia, which already  
represents approximately 65% of its global sales.  
3.1.3.3. Electroplating  
Atotech is the leading company in the electroplating sector based  
on worldwide sales(1). It is active in the markets for electronics  
(
(
printed circuits, semiconductors) and general surface treatments  
automotive, construction, furnishing).  
3.2. Trading & Shipping  
Trading & Shipping’s main focus is serving the Group, and its  
activities primarily involve:  
3.2.1. Trading  
TOTAL is one of the world’s largest traders of crude oil and refined  
products on the basis of volumes traded. The table below sets forth  
selected information with respect to Trading’s worldwide crude oil  
sales and supply sources and refined products sales for each of  
the past three years.  
selling and marketing the Group’s crude oil production;  
providing a supply of crude oil for the Group’s refineries;  
importing and exporting the appropriate petroleum and refined  
products for the Group’s refineries to be able to adjust their  
production to the needs of local markets;  
Trading of physical volumes of crude oil and refined products  
amounted to 4.5 Mb/d in 2013.  
chartering appropriate ships for these activities; and  
undertaking trading on various derivatives markets.  
Trading & Shipping conducts its activities worldwide through  
various wholly-owned subsidiaries, including TOTSA Total Oil  
Trading S.A., Atlantic Trading & Marketing Inc., Total Trading  
Asia Pte, Total Trading and Marketing Canada L.P., Total Trading  
Atlantique S.A. and Chartering & Shipping Services S.A.  
(1) Based on publicly available information, 2013 consolidated sales.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
45  
Business overview  
2
Refining & Chemicals  
Trading’s crude oil sales and supply and refined products sales(a)  
(kb/d)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Group’s worldwide liquids production  
Purchased by Trading from Exploration & Production  
Purchased by Trading from external suppliers  
1,167  
916  
1,994  
1,220  
976  
1,904  
1,226  
960  
1,833  
Total of Trading’s supply  
2,910  
2,880  
2,793  
Sales by Trading to Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments  
Sales by Trading to external customers  
1,556  
1,354  
1,569  
1,311  
1,524  
1,269  
Total of Trading’s sales  
2,910  
1,628  
2,880  
1,608  
2,793  
1,632  
Total of Trading’s refined products sales  
(a) Including condensates.  
Trading operates extensively on physical and derivatives markets, both organized and over the counter. In connection with its trading  
activities, TOTAL, like most other oil companies, uses derivative energy instruments (futures, forwards, swaps and options) to adjust its  
exposure to fluctuations in the price of crude oil and refined products. These transactions are entered into with various counterparties.  
For additional information concerning derivatives transactions by Trading & Shipping, see Notes 30 (Financial instruments related to  
commodity contracts) and 31 (Market risks) to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Chapter 10, point 7).  
All of TOTAL’s trading activities are subject to strict internal controls and trading limits.  
In 2013, the global oil market was balanced and oil prices fell  
slightly from 2012. Crude oil prices were subject to increased  
backwardation(1). Crude oil prices in North America benefited from  
a significant reduction in the price spread between the crude markers  
WTI (West Texas Intermediate, confined to the central United States  
and subject to a local production surplus) and Dated Brent (delivered  
in the North Sea and accessible to the international crude market).  
Freight rates decreased in 2013 due to an ever-growing availability  
in charter capacities.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013/12  
min 2013  
max 2013  
Brent ICE - 1 Line(a)  
st  
($/b) 108.70  
($/b) 103.04  
111.68  
106.66  
110.91  
108.12  
-2.7%  
-3.4%  
97.69  
95.95  
(Apr 17)  
(Apr 17)  
118.90  
110.50 (Feb 13)  
(Feb 8)  
Brent ICE - 12th Line(b)  
Backwardation time structure  
st  
th  
(
1 - 12 )  
($/b)  
5.67  
5.01  
94.15  
-17.53  
953.42  
16.30  
2.79  
95.11  
-15.80  
933.30  
14.36  
13.1%  
4.1%  
-39.2%  
-3.6%  
-10.1%  
11.37  
86.68 (Feb 13)  
-23.18  
822.75  
9.20  
(Sep 3)  
1.74  
110.53  
-0.02  
1,030.75 (Feb 18)  
19.62 (Feb 11)  
(Apr 17)  
(May 4)  
(Jul 19)  
st  
(a)  
WTI NYMEX - 1 Line  
WTI vs. Brent 1 Line  
Gasoil ICE - 1 Line  
ICE Gasoil vs ICE Brent  
($/b) 98.05  
($/b) -10.66  
($/t) 918.98  
($/b) 14.65  
st  
(Feb 8)  
(May 1)  
(May 2)  
st  
(a)  
(
(
a) 1st Line: quotation on ICE or NYMEX Futures for first nearby month delivery.  
b) 12 Line: quotation on ICE Futures for twelfth nearby month delivery.  
th  
In 2013, Trading’s activities were affected by the global economic  
environment described below. After a slow-down worldwide during  
the first quarter of 2013, economic growth began a gradual recovery,  
pulling the Eurozone out of six quarters of recession by the second  
quarter of 2013. This slight improvement came to a halt in the third  
quarter under the impact of significant exchange rate fluctuations  
in emerging markets and the budget debate in the United States.  
Estimated global oil supplies stagnated in 2013, increasing by only  
+0.2 Mb/d after jumping +2.7 Mb/d in 2012. Non-OPEC production  
grew by approximately +1.0 Mb/d, increasing by +1.2 Mb/d in  
North America (United States and Canada), which offset declining  
or stagnating output in other countries.  
Overall OPEC production decreased by 1.0 Mb/d, with crude oil  
production decreasing by 1.1 Mb/d. Significant crude oil production  
capacity was made unavailable (more than 3 Mb/d in the third  
quarter, compared to approximately 2 Mb/d at the start of 2013),  
thereby limiting the supply from certain countries due to, among  
other reasons, sanctions imposed on Iran, conflicts in Libya and  
acts of sabotage in Nigeria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia increased its  
production during the course of 2013 to help maintain market  
equilibrium, which sharply reduced OPEC’s excess capacity.  
In this context, growth in the demand for oil nevertheless remained  
constant (+1.1 Mb/d(2), nearly identical to 2012). Diesel fuel and  
gasoline led this growth (+0.4 Mb/d each), while demand for fuel  
oil contracted (-0.2 Mb/d) due to efficiency gains among shipowners  
and reduced demand from Japanese power generators. The  
increase in oil demand was focused in Asia and the Middle East  
(+0.6 Mb/d in total), while demand in Europe decreased (-0.2 Mb/d).  
(
1) “Backwardation” is a term used to describe an energy market in which the value of the spot, or prompt, price is higher than the value of the forward or futures contracts trading concurrently.  
The reverse situation is described as “contango”.  
(2) TOTAL estimates.  
46  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Refining & Chemicals  
2
The differential between supply and demand narrowed in 2013,  
dropping from +1.2 Mb/d in 2012 to +0.3 Mb/d due to the increase  
in demand and flat supply, thereby slowing the anticipated increase  
in global oil stocks.  
to restore balance in the central U.S. market. The crude price  
spread between WTI and Dated Brent consequently fell from around  
$20/b in January/February 2013 to around $4/b in July/August.  
This price spread widened once again beginning in the third  
quarter with the continuing rapid increase in domestic U.S. crude  
production and only moderate increases in demand.  
Crude oil prices started 2013 on an upward trend, with Dated Brent  
hitting a high of $119.03/b on February 8. Prices then steadily fell,  
driven downward by the deteriorating economic environment in  
Europe and an oversupplied crude market, to reach a low of  
While global refining capacity grew by approximately +0.9 Mb/d in  
2013, crude throughputs increased by only approximately +0.4 Mb/d,  
held back by weaker refining margins. The weak margins reflect the  
growing surplus in global refining capacity. Asian refiners dominated  
the increases in refinery throughputs and capacity (+0.6 Mb/d and  
+1.0 Mb/d, respectively).  
$96.83/b on April 17. The price of Dated Brent stabilized during  
the second quarter of 2013 at a level between $100/b and $105/b.  
Market tensions in the third quarter drove the price of Dated  
Brent back upward ($117.12/b on September 6), before prices  
subsequently leveled off below $110/b.  
On the futures market, the backwardation of ICE Brent contract  
prices increased as a result of the same supply tensions that lifted  
spot (Dated Brent) prices in the first quarter of 2013. This  
backwardation decreased considerably during the second quarter  
with the seasonal drop in demand for crude oil, mainly due to  
planned refinery shutdowns for maintenance. The post-maintenance  
resumption of refining activity and new supply tensions drove  
backwardation to a maximum of $11/b toward the end of  
August before it decreased again late in the year.  
3.2.2. Shipping  
The transportation of crude oil and refined products necessary for  
the activities of the Group is arranged by Shipping. These requirements  
are fulfilled through balanced use of the spot and time-charter markets.  
A rigorous safety policy is applied by Shipping mainly through a strict  
selection of chartered vessels. Like a certain number of other oil  
companies and shipowners, the Group uses freight rate derivative  
contracts to adjust its exposure to freight rate fluctuations.  
In 2013, Trading & Shipping chartered more than 3,000 voyages to  
transport approximately 115 Mt of crude oil and refined products. As  
of December 31, 2013, Trading & Shipping employed a fleet of forty-  
six vessels, none of which were single-hulled, that were chartered  
under long-term or medium-term agreements (including seven LPG  
carriers). The fleet has an average age of approximately five years.  
The year 2013 was also marked by the narrowing of the crude  
price spread between WTI and Dated Brent. Extension of the  
Seaway pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma, to the Texas coast  
of the Gulf of Mexico between January and April, along with the  
commissioning of additional pipelines from the Permian Basin in  
western Texas to the Gulf of Mexico in the second quarter, helped  
Freight rate averages of three representative routes for crude transportation  
2013  
2012  
2011  
min 2013  
max 2013  
VLCC Ras Tanura Chiba-BITR(a)  
Suezmax Bonny Philadelphia-BITR  
Aframax Sullom Voe Wilhemshaven-BITR  
($/t)  
($/t)  
($/t)  
11.83  
13.41  
7.02  
12.82  
14.44  
6.48  
11.99  
13.86  
6.51  
8.95  
9.45  
6.04  
(Jan 29)  
(Oct 2)  
(Feb 1)  
18.99 (Nov 20)  
25.58 (Dec 18)  
14.16 (Dec 24)  
(a) VLCC: Very Large Crude Carrier. BITR: Baltic International Tanker Routes.  
The first nine months of 2013 were a difficult period for the oil  
shipping sector, particularly for larger crude tankers. Conditions  
were more favorable, meanwhile, for petroleum product carriers.  
At the same time, marine bunker prices remained high with a  
knock-on effect on transport costs.  
supply and demand to historic levels. This led to record lows in  
VLCC freight rates through the end of the third quarter. The closing  
months of 2013 saw a reversal in crude oil freight rates, which  
reached a record annual level due to especially strong ongoing  
demand for deliveries to Asia from the Atlantic Basin.  
Global demand for the transport of crude oil stabilized in 2013 after  
posting an increase of more than 5% among larger-sized vessels in  
The situation in the petroleum product shipping market was better  
overall than in the crude oil shipping market. Demand for the transport  
of petroleum products was particularly strong, with arbitrage in favor  
of longer routes, especially to Asia (notably the flow of naphtha from  
Europe to Asia on large carriers). Starting in early 2013, freight rates  
induced ship owners to resume ordering petroleum product tankers  
(MR and LR2(1)), a sector in which growth had moderated.  
2012. This situation was attributable mainly to a decrease in North  
American imports due to an increase in local production in that  
region. This was partially offset by an increase in demand in Asia,  
particularly in China, which has been diversifying its supply from  
more distant sources (South America, Western Africa). The increase  
in tonnage continued to be strong, weakening the balance between  
(1) MR: Medium Range – 50,000 DWT (deadweight tonnage); LR2: Long Range – 110,000 DWT.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
47  
Business overview  
2
Marketing & Services  
4. Marketing & Services segment  
The Marketing & Services segment was created on January 1, 2012, following the reorganization of the Downstream and Chemicals segments,  
(1)  
and includes worldwide supply and marketing activities in the oil products field, as well as, since July 1, 2012, the activity of New Energies .  
Among the largest  
marketers in Western  
Europe(2)  
N°1 14,820 1.4billion 27,878  
marketer service stations at year-end invested in 2013 employees  
in Africa (  
2)  
2013 (excluding AS24  
service stations)  
2
013 refined products sales(a)  
1,987  
1,749  
1,710  
1
,455  
1
,138  
1
,160  
Europe  
For 2013, sales volumes increased by 2% compared to the  
previous year, due to growth in Africa and the Americas, partially  
offset by a decrease in Europe.  
5
32  
550  
611  
Rest of  
World  
(kb/d)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
(
a) Excludes trading and refining bulk sales, includes share  
of CEPSA through July 31, 2011, and of TotalErg.  
Marketing & Services segment financial data  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non-Group sales  
83,481  
1,596  
1,151  
(2)  
86,614  
1,355  
830  
85,325  
1,199  
822  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
Including New Energies  
(169)  
(197)  
(a) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
For 2013, Marketing & Services segment sales were 83.5 billion,  
a decrease of 4% compared to 2012.  
2013 refined products sales  
by geographical area: 1,749 kb/d  
(a)  
Adjusted net operating income from the Marketing & Services  
segment in 2013 was 1,151 million compared to 830 million  
in 2012, an increase of 39% reflecting essentially the improvement  
in the performance of the New Energies, which had particularly  
negative results in 2012, as well as the overall improvement made  
in refined products marketing, particularly in emerging markets.  
Europe 65%  
Africa 19%  
The ROACE (3) for the Marketing & Services segment was 16%  
for 2013, compared to 12% for 2012.  
Rest of World 11%  
Americas 5%  
(a) Excludes trading and refining bulk sales, includes share of TotalErg.  
(
(
(
1) As a result of the reorganization, certain information has been restated.  
2) Based on publicly available information based on quantities sold.  
3) Calculated based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed, using replacement cost.  
48  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Présentation des activités  
Marketing & Services  
2
4.1. Marketing & Services  
TOTAL is one of the leading marketers in Western Europe(1). It is  
also the leader(2) in Africa and certain Middle Eastern countries.  
– In Italy, TotalErg (49%) has a network of more than 3,000 service  
stations, which makes it the third-largest operator in the country.  
As part of an asset optimization strategy, TotalErg ceased  
production at its Rome refinery in late 2012 and subsequently  
converted that site into a logistics hub for petroleum products  
storage.  
TOTAL sells a wide range of products produced from its refineries  
and other facilities in approximately 150 countries(3). TOTAL is  
among the key players in the specialty products market, in  
particular for lubricants, LPG, jet fuel, special fluids, bitumen,  
heavy fuels and marine fuels.  
– In the United Kingdom, TOTAL retains a market presence  
through its specialty products activities, particularly lubricants  
and jet fuel. In 2011, the Group sold its network of service  
stations and its fuel and heating oil marketing business in the  
United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man.  
TOTAL also sells numerous services for consumers and  
professionals in the mobility, residential and industrial sectors.  
As part of its activities, Marketing & Services holds stakes in five  
refineries in Africa, one in Europe through its share in TotalErg (49%)  
and one in the Caribbean.  
In Northern, Central and Eastern Europe, TOTAL continued in 2013  
to expand its direct presence in these growing markets, in particular  
for lubricants and bitumen. The Group specifically accelerated growth  
of its business in specialty products, including bitumen, in Russia  
and launched a marketing subsidiary in Kazakhstan.  
Marketing & Services follows a proactive, primarily organic,  
development strategy involving the shifting of positions to  
high-growth areas.  
TOTAL also operates a network of 731 AS24-branded service  
stations dedicated to commercial transporters in twenty-seven  
European countries. The Group continued developing its business  
in 2013 in Turkey, where it opened a new subsidiary. The AS24  
network is expected to continue to grow, mainly through expansion  
in the Mediterranean Basin and Russia and through its toll payment  
card service, which covers more than seventeen countries.  
4
.1.1. Europe  
TOTAL operates a network of more than 8,850 service stations  
in Europe located throughout France, Belgium, the Netherlands,  
Luxembourg and Germany as well as Italy through its stake  
in TotalErg (49%). The Group is a major player in the market  
for fuel-payment cards, with nearly 3.8 million cards issued in  
twenty-seven European countries.  
4
.1.2. Africa & the Middle East  
In specialty products, the Group benefits from its extensive  
presence in Europe and relies on numerous industrial facilities  
to produce lubricants (mainly Rouen in France and Ertvelde in  
Belgium), special fluids (Oudalle in France), bitumen (Brunsbüttel  
in Germany) and grease (Baisieux in France).  
TOTAL is the leading marketer of petroleum products on the African  
continent and in certain Middle Eastern countries, with a market  
share averaging 13%(5) in 2013. The Group operates more than  
4,700 service stations in more than forty countries in these high-  
growth markets, including major networks in South Africa, Turkey,  
Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt and Morocco.  
In Western Europe, TOTAL continued to optimize its Marketing  
business in 2013.  
In Egypt, TOTAL signed agreements with Shell (May 2013) and  
Chevron (August 2013) with a view to developing its network of  
service stations and wholesale business. After the closing of these  
transactions, the Group will become the second-largest private  
operator in Africa’s largest market, with a 14% network(6) market share.  
In France, the dense network includes more than 1,600  
TOTAL-branded service stations, 600 Total Access stations  
(service station concept combining low prices and premium  
TOTAL-branded fuels and services) and 1,550 Elan service  
stations, which are located mainly in rural areas.  
As part of the optimization of its portfolio, the Group undertook  
processes to open up the share capital of selected subsidiaries  
to local investors to enhance its local presence.  
In addition, TOTAL’s GR (fuel and service cards) offering was  
expanded in 2013, helping to consolidate the Group’s leading  
position in the provision of solutions to road transport  
professionals.  
In Jordan, TOTAL continued developing its service station network  
and wholesale business following its acquisition of a distribution  
license there in 2012.  
TOTAL leads the heating oil market in France(4), with seven local  
subsidiaries covering the entire country. TOTAL continued its  
diversification strategy in 2013, with the commercial launch  
of wood pellets and online sale of fuel through fioulmarket.fr,  
France’s first website for heating oil consumers.  
TOTAL is pursuing its strategy for growth in the specialty products  
markets. The Group, which relies in particular on the lubricants  
blending plant in Dubai, started up new plants in Egypt in 2012  
and in Saudi Arabia in October 2013.  
In petroleum products logistics, Marketing & Services finalized  
the implementation of a new organization at the end of 2012.  
As a result of this adaptation, TOTAL now holds stakes in  
twenty-three depots, of which it operates seven.  
Moreover, TOTAL has become a leading partner for mining  
customers by delivering supply chain and management solutions  
for fuels and lubricants.  
(
(
(
(
(
(
1) Publicly available information, based on quantities sold (2013).  
2) PFC Energy and Company data.  
3) Including via national distributors.  
4) CPDP 2013 and Company data.  
5) Market share in the countries where the Group operates, based on 2013 publicly available information, quantities sold.  
6) PFC Energy.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
49  
Business overview  
2
Marketing & Services  
4.1.3. Asia-Pacific  
4.1.5. Sales of refined products  
At year-end 2013, TOTAL was present in more than twenty countries  
in the Asia-Pacific region, where the Group is strengthening its  
position in the distribution of fuels and specialty products. In the  
lubricants sector in particular, TOTAL continues to grow in the  
region, with a 6.3% increase in lubricant sales in 2013 compared  
with 2012.  
The table below sets forth TOTAL’s sales of refined products by region:  
(kb/d)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
France  
575  
564  
86  
566  
594  
53  
574  
881  
56  
Europe, excluding France(a)  
Americas  
Africa  
Rest of the World  
326  
198  
307  
190  
304  
172  
TOTAL operates service stations in China, Pakistan, the Philippines,  
Cambodia and Indonesia and is a significant player in the Pacific  
Islands.  
Total excluding Trading  
and refinery bulk sales  
1,749  
1,710  
1,987  
In China, the Group was operating approximately 200 service stations  
at year-end 2013 through two joint ventures with Sinochem and  
a wholly-owned subsidiary. In October 2013, the Group opened  
its third lubricants blending plant in China. Located in Tianjin,  
this state-of-the-art plant has a capacity of 200 kt/y.  
Trading  
Refinery bulk sales  
1,155  
514  
1,161  
532  
1,215  
437  
Total including Trading  
and refinery bulk sales  
3,418  
3,403  
3,639  
In Pakistan, through its local partner PARCO, TOTAL announced  
in August 2013 its acquisition of Chevron’s distribution network.  
Pending approval from the relevant authorities, this transaction  
encompasses the management of more than 500 service stations  
as well as Chevron’s fuel business and storage sites.  
(
a) Including the Group’s share in CEPSA (up to end of July 2011).  
For data on biofuels, refer to Chapter 2, paragraph 3.1.1.8.  
4
.1.6. Service stations  
In India, TOTAL continued to strengthen its positions in the  
lubricants and LPG sectors with the expansion of its LPG network  
to thirty-three stations in 2013. In 2012, TOTAL also inaugurated  
its first lubricants, bitumen, special fluids and additives technical  
center outside of Europe.  
The table below sets forth the number of service stations of the  
Group (excluding AS24):  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
France(a)  
3,813  
5,062  
3,017  
3,726  
2,219  
3,911  
5,200  
3,161  
3,601  
2,013  
4,046  
5,375  
3,355  
3,464  
1,934  
In Vietnam, TOTAL continued to strengthen its presence in the  
specialty products market. The Group became one of the leaders  
in the Vietnamese LPG market with the acquisition of Vinagas  
in 2012.  
Europe, excluding France  
of which TotalErg  
Africa  
Rest of the World  
In Singapore, TOTAL announced in March 2013 the construction  
of a lubricants blending plant with a capacity of 310 kt/y to assist in  
meeting inland and marine lubricants demand in the Asia-Pacific region.  
Total  
14,820  
14,725  
14,819  
(
a) TOTAL, Total Access, Elf and Elan-branded service stations.  
4.1.4. Americas  
4.1.7. Product and services developments  
In Latin America and the Caribbean, TOTAL is active directly in  
about twenty countries and indirectly (via distributors) in about ten  
more countries in the markets of specialty products (lubricants  
and special fluids) and fuels (service station network, wholesale,  
aviation). The Group holds a significant position(1) in the Caribbean  
fuel distribution business.  
TOTAL continued in 2013 its technical and R&D partnerships in  
Formula 1 with Renault Sport F1, in the WRC with Citroën Racing  
and in endurance racing with Toyota. The purpose of these  
partnerships is to demonstrate TOTAL’s technical excellence in  
the formulation of fuels and lubricants under extreme conditions  
and restrictions on fuel consumption. The TOTAL brand was  
associated with two Formula 1 world titles in 2013.  
In the United States and Canada, TOTAL mainly markets specialty  
products, particularly lubricants, jet fuels and special fluids. To  
strengthen its special fluids business, the Group took on a project  
to build a special fluids production plant near Houston, Texas,  
which is expected to be operational at the beginning of 2015.  
TOTAL continued its Clean Energy Partnership (CEP) in Germany,  
which is centered on hydrogen distribution. TOTAL currently has  
five demonstration stations for hydrogen distribution in Germany.  
A new hydrogen station is scheduled to open near the new airport  
in Berlin during the first half of 2014. TOTAL signed an agreement  
with Daimler in 2013 for the joint development of eight new stations  
under the CEP. Along with its partners in the “H2 Mobility” initiative,  
TOTAL also signed a preliminary agreement covering the  
TOTAL operates a significant number of industrial units throughout  
the Americas (production of lubricants, storage and conditioning  
of LPG) and owns a 50% stake in SARA (Société anonyme de la  
raffinerie des Antilles) in Martinique.  
(1) Present in multiple Caribbean islands including Puerto Rico, Jamaica, Haiti, Martinique and Guadeloupe.  
50  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Marketing & Services  
2
implementation of an action plan targeting construction of a network  
of hydrogen stations throughout Germany. It is anticipated that  
this network will have approximately 400 stations by 2023 (subject  
to deployment of more than 250,000 fuel-cell electric vehicles).  
TOTAL undertook within its European subsidiaries additional studies  
in 2013 into the potential of LNG as a fuel for heavy duty vehicles.  
The development of at least two pilot stations is scheduled for 2014.  
In response to global market developments and looking ahead to future  
growth opportunities, TOTAL developed and tested five new energy  
optimization offerings among consumers and Corporate customers in  
2013 based on multi-energy production (fuels, gas, photovoltaic, wood)  
and energy efficiency services (audit, monitoring, management).  
TOTAL has approximately twenty prototype electric vehicle fueling  
stations in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and France. The  
demonstration program of the distribution of electricity (fast charge)  
intended for electric vehicles continued at these stations in 2013.  
4.2. New Energies  
New Energies is developing renewable energies that will, in  
at the end of 2013 for start-up of production in 2015.  
combination with hydrocarbons, help establish a more diversified  
Downstream, SunPower markets its panels worldwide for applications  
ranging from residential roof tiles to large solar power plants.  
energy mix while also generating lower CO emissions. In meeting  
2
this objective, TOTAL is focusing on two main development axes:  
solar energy, which benefits from unlimited energetic resources,  
particularly in certain geographical zones where the Group has  
a significant presence, and the transformation of biomass through  
use of biotechnology, which aims to develop new biosourced  
product solutions for transport and chemicals. The Group keeps  
an active watch on other renewable energies not classified as  
priority areas for development at this time.  
In the United States, SunPower completed the construction in  
2013 of the California Valley Solar Ranch, solar power plant (CVSR,  
314 MWp), and started up the plant at the world’s largest solar  
farm, Solar Star (709 MWp), sold to NRG Energy and MidAmerican,  
respectively, at the time of the investment decision.  
TOTAL and SunPower also launched new solar power plant projects  
in Chile and South Africa in 2013. In Chile, SunPower is both  
supplying panels for and constructing the Salvador plant (70 MWp)  
in cooperation with TOTAL. The project, in which TOTAL is a 20%  
shareholder, is 70% financed by OPIC, the U.S. development finance  
institution. The electricity produced will be sold on the spot market  
and used to power the Chilean electricity grid.  
4.2.1. Solar energy  
TOTAL is developing upstream operations through industrial  
production and downstream marketing activities in the photovoltaic  
sector based on crystalline silicon technology. The Group is also  
pursuing R&D in this field through several industrial and academic  
partnerships.  
In South Africa, subsequent to a tender offer, TOTAL and SunPower  
were selected by the South African government to build a free-  
standing 86 MWp solar power plant. TOTAL is a 27% shareholder  
in the project, while SunPower will supply the solar panels and  
construct the plant, which will sell the electricity produced under  
an energy purchase agreement.  
The economic context in this sector is currently stabilizing following  
two years of sharp price decreases that drove many players out of  
the market. Competitiveness in photovoltaic solar energy has  
improved and significant technical achievements have supported  
the emergence for the first time of markets that are profitable  
without subsidization.  
In Asia, SunPower was selected in September 2013 to become  
the main supplier of panels (69 MWp) to the largest solar power  
plant in Japan, located in the Aomori Prefecture.  
4
.2.1.1. SunPower  
4
.2.1.2. Other solar assets  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held a 64.65% stake in SunPower,  
a U.S. company listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: SPWR) and based  
in San José, California. SunPower is an integrated player that  
designs, manufactures and supplies the highest-efficiency solar  
panels in the market. For additional information, see chapter 7,  
point 2., energy efficiency. SunPower is active throughout the solar  
chain, from photovoltaic cell production based on crystalline silicon  
to the design and construction of large turnkey power plants,  
as well as the commercialization of solar solutions for residential  
and commercial markets.  
The Shams 1 solar power plant (109 MW of parabolic concentrated  
solar power) in Abu Dhabi was commissioned in September 2013  
with production being sold to the Abu Dhabi Water Electricity  
Company (ADWEC). TOTAL (20%) will take part in its operation  
for a 25-year period.  
TOTAL owns a 50% interest in the French company Sunzil, which  
markets photovoltaic panels overseas.  
Elsewhere, the Group is continuing initiatives to display solar  
application solutions as part of decentralized rural electrification  
projects in a number of countries, including in South Africa  
via Kwazulu Energy Services Company (KES), in which TOTAL  
holds a 35% stake.  
Upstream, SunPower manufactures all of its cells in Asia (Philippines,  
Malaysia) and has a total production capacity of 1,300 MW/y.  
The company is continuing to adjust its production capacity while  
maintaining its technological leadership through a significant R&D  
program. The cells are assembled into modules, or solar panels,  
in plants located in Asia, the United States, Mexico, Europe and  
South Africa. A 350 MW expansion in capacity was approved  
Photovoltech, a Belgian company (50%) specialized in manufacturing  
multicrystalline photovoltaic cells, was put into liquidation in  
October 2013 after having ceased operations in late 2012.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
51  
Business overview  
2
Marketing & Services  
4
.2.1.3. New solar technologies  
biosourced molecules. Amyris owns a cutting-edge industrial  
synthetic biological platform designed to create and optimize  
micro-organisms that can convert sugars into molecules of interest  
through fermentation. Amyris also owns a research laboratory and  
pilot units in California and Brazil. In early 2013, Amyris started up  
an industrial production site for farnesene, which is used in the  
production of renewable diesel and kerosene, in Brotas, in the state  
of São Paulo, Brazil.  
In order to strengthen its technological leadership in the crystalline  
silicon field, and in addition to its cooperation with SunPower in  
the R&D field, New Energies partners with leading laboratories  
and research institutes in France and abroad. The aim of these  
partnerships is to optimize the photovoltaic solar chain (silicon,  
wafers, cells, modules and systems) by cutting production costs  
and multiplying its applications, while increasing the efficiency  
of the components in terms of electric conversion.  
At the end of 2013, TOTAL and Amyris created Total Amyris  
Biosolutions, a 50/50 joint venture that holds the exclusive rights  
and intellectual property in relation to farnesene.  
In this regard, TOTAL is working with the IMEC (Interuniversity  
MicroElectronics Center – Belgium) and the École Polytechnique’s  
LPICM (Laboratory of physics of interfaces and thin layers), which  
specializes in plasma-deposition processes at low temperatures.  
Further to this partnership, TOTAL and, principally, the CNRS, the  
École Polytechnique and EDF signed in October 2013 a funding  
agreement with the National Research Agency (ANR) concerning  
the IPVF (Institut Photovoltaïque d’Île-de-France), which, with its  
team of nearly 200 researchers, aims to eventually become one  
of the main centers worldwide conducting research into latest-  
generation photovoltaic devices.  
In addition, the Group continues to develop a global network of  
R&D partnerships in technology segments that are complementary  
to Amyris’ platform (deconstruction of lignocellulose, synthetic  
biology, metabolism engineering), including with Joint BioEnergy  
Institute (JBEI, United States), Novogy (United States), Gevo Inc.  
(NASDAQ: GEVO, United States), the University of Wageningen  
(Netherlands) and the Toulouse White Biotechnology consortium  
(TWB) (France).  
The Group is also studying the longer-term potential for developing  
a cost-effective phototrophic process for producing biomolecules  
through the bio-engineering of microalgae and associated processes.  
An exploratory research agreement was signed with the Grenoble  
CEA (Atomic and Alternative Energies Commission) in late 2013,  
and two development projects are underway with the AlgaePark  
consortium in the Netherlands.  
With respect to electricity storage, TOTAL is continuing its R&D  
program with renowned institutions such as the Massachusetts  
Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States to develop  
a new battery technology, and is investing in start-ups including  
Ambri (11%), founded at MIT, as well as Lightsail and Enervault,  
also based in the United States.  
4
.2.2. Biotechnologies and  
4.2.3. Other renewable energies  
the conversion of biomass  
In the field of wind power, TOTAL owns a 12 MW wind farm in Mardyck  
(near Dunkirk, France), which was commissioned in 2003.  
TOTAL is exploring a number of opportunities for developing  
biomass depending on its nature, accessibility and sustainability.  
The Group’s objective is to sell high-performance molecules in  
targeted markets (fuel, lubricants, special polymers, chemicals,  
etc.). The focus of New Energies is on the biochemical conversion  
process for this biomass.  
In marine energy, TOTAL holds a 26.7% share in Scotrenewables  
Tidal Power, located in the Orkney Islands in Scotland. Tests on  
a 250 kW prototype have been successfully completed. A 2 MW  
commercial model is being developed.  
Amyris Inc., a U.S. company listed on NASDAQ (NASDAQ: AMRS),  
was identified for TOTAL’s first significant equity investment in  
biotechnology. At year-end 2013, TOTAL held 17.9% of the company.  
A collaboration agreement with Amyris has been signed covering  
research (including the formation of a shared research team),  
development, production and marketing activities relating to  
52  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Investments  
2
5. Investments  
5
.1. Major investments over the 2011-2013 period(1)  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Upstream  
22,396  
2,039  
1,365  
122  
19,618  
1,944  
1,301  
80  
20,662  
1,910  
1,834  
135  
Refining & Chemicals  
Marketing & Services  
Corporate  
Total  
25,922  
22,943  
24,541  
Organic capital expenditure, including net investment in equity  
affiliates and non-consolidated subsidiaries, amounted to $28.3  
billion in 2013 (21.3 billion(2)), compared with $23.8 billion in 2012  
While continuing to develop its major Exploration & Production  
projects in 2013, the Group also strengthened its prospects beyond  
2017 by acquiring high-potential assets, particularly in Brazil, and by  
extending its acreage through licenses obtained in promising  
exploration areas. Thus, acquisitions were $4.5 billion (3.4 billion),  
comprised essentially of the acquisition of a stake in the Libra field  
in Brazil, an additional 6% stake in the Ichthys project in Australia, an  
additional 1.6% stake in Novatek , the carry agreement in the Utica  
shale gas and condensates field in the United States and the bonus  
for exploration licenses in South Africa, Mozambique and Brazil.  
(18.5 billion). This increase was due to a rise in investments  
related to a large number of Upstream projects under development.  
In 2013, in the Upstream segment, capital expenditure was mainly  
intended for the development of new hydrocarbon production  
facilities and exploration operations.Development expenditure was  
devoted primarily to the following projects: GLNG and Ichthys in  
Australia, Surmont and Fort Hills in Canada, the Ekofisk and Eldfisk  
areas in Norway, the Laggan Tormore projects in the United Kingdom,  
Moho North in Congo, CLOV in Angola, Ofon II and Egina in Nigeria  
and Yamal in Russia.  
(3)  
Total investment (including acquisitions and changes in non-current  
loans) therefore increased from $27.8 billion (21.7 billion) in 2012  
to $32.8 billion (24.7 billion) in 2013.  
In the Refining & Chemicals segment, capital expenditure was  
devoted to the maintenance of facilities and safety and to projects  
to increase the production of lighter products, add desulphurization  
capacities, adapt the refining base to new specifications and improve  
energy efficiency. 2013 was marked by the announcement of the  
upgrading project at the Antwerp refinery in Belgium and a project  
to adapt the petrochemicals platform in Carling, France, and by  
the start of production at the SATORP refinery in Saudi Arabia.  
In 2013, asset sales totaled $4.7 billion (3,6 billion) compared with  
$5.9 billion (4,6 billion) in 2012, comprised essentially of the sale  
of TIGF(4), a 25% stake in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy, the interest  
in the Voyager upgrader project in Canada, fertilizer operations and  
all the Exploration & Production assets in Trinidad and Tobago.  
Net investments were therefore $25.9 billion (19.5 biIlion) in 2013,  
compared with $21.9 billion (17.1 billion) in 2012, an increase of  
18%. They include $2.2 billion (1.6 billion) related to the sale of  
In the Marketing & Services segment, capital expenditure in 2013  
was mainly dedicated to the network, logistics and specialty  
production and storage facilities.  
minority equity interests in Total E&P Congo and Block 14 in Angola,  
which are shown in the financing section of the cash flow statement.  
5.2. Major investments anticipated  
After reaching a high of $28,3 billion in 2013, the organic investment  
budget was reduced to $26 billion in 2014, more than 80% of  
which will be dedicated to Upstream. Investments in the Upstream  
Segment are expected to amount to $ 22 billion and should be  
mainly dedicated to major development projects, including GLNG  
and Ichthys in Australia, Surmont and Fort Hills in Canada, the  
Ekofisk and Eldfisk areas in Norway, the Laggan Tormore projects  
in the United Kingdom, Moho North in Congo, CLOV in Angola,  
Ofon II and Egina in Nigeria and Yamal in Russia. A significant  
portion of the segment’s budget will also be allocated to maintenance  
and integrity work on assets already in production.  
The Refining & Chemicals segment has an over $ 2 billion capital  
expenditure budget, that is expected to be dedicated to the refining,  
petrochemicals and specialty chemicals businesses. In particular,  
2014 is expected to be marked by the start of upgrade work on the  
integrated platform in Antwerp, Belgium. A significant portion of the  
segment’s budget will also be allocated to maintenance and safety,  
which are vital to this type of industrial activity.  
The Marketing & Services segment has a nearly $ 2 billion capital  
expenditure budget that is expected to finance, in particular, the  
service station network, logistics, specialty production and storage  
(
(
(
(
1) Including acquisitions. Major acquisitions for fiscal years 2011-2013 are detailed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Registration Document.  
2) Based on average exchange rates for 2013 of $1.3281/.  
3) The Group’s interest in Novatek was 16.96% at December 31, 2013.  
4) Major disposals for fiscal years 2011-2013 are detailed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Registration Document.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
53  
Business overview  
2
Organizational structure  
facilities (lubricants, LPG, etc.) and the development of this segment’s  
activities in New Energies. Most of the Marketing & Services  
budget will be allocated to growth areas (Africa, Middle East,  
Asia and Latin America).  
being negotiated and reviewed should enable TOTAL to reach,  
and possibly exceed, the target set in 2014.  
As part of certain project financing arrangements, TOTAL S.A.  
has provided guarantees. These guarantees (“Guarantees given  
on borrowings”) as well as other information on off-balance sheet  
commitments and contractual obligations for the Group appear  
in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Chapter 10,  
point 7.). The Group does not currently consider that these  
guarantees, or any other off-balance sheet arrangements of  
TOTAL S.A. nor any other members of the Group, currently have  
or are reasonably likely to have in the future a material effect on  
the Group’s financial situation, revenues or expenses, liquidity,  
capital expenditure or capital resources.  
After 2014, TOTAL expects investments to be in line with more  
moderate post-2017 growth based on increased production.  
Moreover, all the Group’s segments are making efforts to control  
their investments and reduce their operating costs while continuing  
to make safety an absolute priority.  
TOTAL self-finances most of its capital expenditure from cash flow  
from operations (see the consolidated statement of cash flow,  
Chapter 10, point 5.), which is essentially increased by accessing  
the bond market on a regular basis, when conditions on the  
financial markets are favorable (see Note 20 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements, Chapter 10, point 7.). However, capital  
expenditure for joint ventures between TOTAL and external  
partners are generally funded through project financing.  
In November 2012, TOTAL announced the sale of the Group’s  
interest in the offshore OML 138 Block in Nigeria, which includes  
the Usan. field, and in February 2014 the signing of an agreement  
to sell its 15% interest in the offshore Block 15/06 in Angola to  
Sonangol E&P for $750 million. The approval by the authorities  
has not yet been received for the sale of its interest in OML 138.  
The closing of the sale of the interest in Block 15/06 is expected  
during the first half of 2014.  
In addition, the Group has confirmed the target of selling $15 to  
$
20 billion in assets over the 2012-2014 period. With $13 billion  
in assets already sold(1) at the end of 2013, the proposed sales  
6. Organizational structure  
6.1. Position of the Company within the Group  
TOTAL S.A. is the Group’s parent company. As of December 31, 2013,  
there were 898 consolidated subsidiaries, of which 809 were fully  
consolidated and 89 were accounted for under the equity method.  
As of December 31, 2013, the Group’s businesses are organized  
as indicated on the chart in point 8. of this Chapter. The Group’s  
businesses receive assistance from Corporate divisions  
(
Finance, Legal, Ethics, Insurance, Strategy & Business Intelligence,  
The decision of TOTAL S.A.’s major subsidiaries to declare  
dividends is made by their relevant Shareholders’ Meetings and is  
subject to the provisions of applicable local laws and regulations.  
As of December 31, 2013, there is no restriction under such  
provisions that would materially restrict the distribution to  
TOTAL S.A. of the dividends declared by those subsidiaries.  
Human Resources and Communications) that are grouped  
within the parent company, TOTAL S.A.  
6.2. Company subsidiaries  
A list of the major subsidiaries directly or indirectly held by the  
Company is given in Note 35 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements (Scope of Consolidation) in Chapter 10, point 7. of this  
Registration Document.  
(1) Including other transactions with minority interests.  
54  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Property, plant and equipment  
2
7. Property, plant and equipment  
TOTAL has freehold and leasehold interests in over 130 countries  
throughout the world. Operations in properties, oil and gas fields  
or any other industrial, commercial or administrative facility, as well  
as the production capacities and utilization rates of these facilities,  
are described in this Chapter for each business segment  
Minimum royalties from finance lease agreements regarding  
properties, service stations, vessels and other equipment  
are given in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
(Chapter 10, point 7.).  
Information about the Company’s environmental policy,  
in particular that related to the Group’s industrial sites or facilities,  
is presented in Chapter 7 – Social and environmental information  
of this Registration Document.  
(Upstream, Refining & Chemicals, Marketing & Services).  
A summary of the Group’s property, plant and equipment  
and their main related expenses (depreciation and impairment)  
is included in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
(Chapter 10, point 7.).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
55  
Business overview  
2
Organization chart as of December 31, 2013  
8. Organization chart as of December 31, 2013  
Ethics Committee  
CHAIRMAN AND CEO  
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE  
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE  
Corporate Affairs  
Purchasing  
Public affairs  
Internal Control and Audit  
Human resources  
Corporate Security  
Industrial Safety  
Sustainable Development & Environment  
Top Executive management  
Upstream segment  
Exploration  
Production  
Gas  
& Power  
&
Corporate  
Affairs  
Division  
Industrial  
assets,  
Finance, IT  
Strategy,  
Market  
& LNG  
Africa  
Middle East  
Northern Europe  
Americas  
Exploration  
Development  
Operations  
Trading  
Marketing  
Strategy -  
Business  
Asia-Pacific  
Development -  
Engineering -  
R&D  
Continental  
Europe  
&
Central Asia  
56  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Business overview  
Organization chart as of December 31, 2013  
2
Finance  
Information  
Technology  
Telecommunications  
Advisers  
to the Chairman  
and CEO  
Strategy  
Scientific  
Development  
Finance  
Insurance  
Communications  
Legal Affairs  
& Business  
Intelligence  
Refining & Chemicals segment  
Marketing & Services segment  
Trading  
Shipping  
Refining  
& Chemicals  
Marketing & Services  
New Energies  
&
Forecasting,  
Institutional  
Relations &  
Products &  
Derivatives  
Trading  
Refining  
Chem base  
Europe  
Strategy  
Marketing  
Research  
Crude Oil  
Trading  
Health Security  
Environment  
Business  
Administration  
& operations  
Communication  
Health,  
Safety,  
Security,  
Environment  
and Quality  
Refining  
Petrochemicals  
Eastern  
Manufacturing  
& Projects  
Division  
Products  
Trading  
Human  
Resources  
Shipping  
hemisphere  
Refining  
Petrochemicals  
Americas  
Strategy  
Development  
Research  
Supply  
logistics  
Europe  
&
Africa  
Middle east  
Polymers  
Administration  
Americas  
Asia  
Pacific  
Global  
Businesses  
Rubber  
Adhesives  
Bostik)  
Electroplating  
(Atotech)  
processing  
Hutchinson)  
(
(
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
57  
58  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
3.Rapport de gestion  
Management Report  
3
Management Report  
The items of the Management report including points 1. to 4. were approved by the Board of Directors on February 11, 2014 and  
have not been updated with subsequent events.  
1.  
Summary of results and financial position  
60  
1.1.  
1.2.  
1.3.  
1.4.  
1.5.  
1.6.  
1.7.  
Overview of the 2013 fiscal year for TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60  
2013 Group results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61  
Upstream results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63  
Refining & Chemicals results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .64  
Marketing & Services results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65  
TOTAL S.A. results in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65  
Proposed dividend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .65  
2.  
Liquidity and capital resources  
66  
2.1.  
2.2.  
2.3.  
2.4.  
2.5.  
Long-term and short-term capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66  
Cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66  
Borrowing requirements and funding structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67  
External financing available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67  
Anticipated sources of financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67  
3.  
Research & Development  
68  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
3.4.  
3.5.  
Upstream segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68  
Refining & Chemicals segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69  
Marketing & Services segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69  
Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70  
R&D organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70  
4.  
Trends and outlook  
71  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71  
Risks and uncertainties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71  
Sensitivity of the 2014 results to market environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .71  
5.  
Significant changes  
72  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
59  
Management Report  
3
Summary of results and financial position  
1. Summary of results and financial position  
1.1. Overview of the 2013 fiscal year for TOTAL  
The year 2013 was marked by the end of the recession in the euro  
zone in the second quarter and the stability of emerging countries.  
This improvement was mitigated in the third quarter by the impacts  
of significant exchange rate fluctuations in emerging markets and  
the budget debate in the United States.  
which posted significant losses in 2012, and overall growth in marketing  
of petroleum products, driven mainly by emerging markets.  
Acquisitions were 3.4 billion in 2013, comprised essentially of the  
acquisition of a 20% stake in the Libra field in Brazil, an additional  
6% stake in the Ichthys project in Australia, an additional 1.6% stake  
In this context, global oil demand rose sharply by +1.1 Mb/d(1)  
,
in Novatek(4), the carry agreement in the Utica shale gas and  
condensates field in the United States and the bonus for exploration  
licenses in South Africa, Mozambique and Brazil. Asset sales totaled  
3.6 billion, comprised essentially of the sale of TIGF, a 25% stake  
in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy, the 49% interest in the Voyager  
upgrader project in Canada, fertilizer operations and all the  
Exploration & Production assets in Trinidad and Tobago. Thus,  
of the $15 to 20 billion in sales targeted for the 2012-2014 period,  
the Group had already sold $13 billion(5) in assets at the end of 2013(6).  
compared to +0.8 Mb/d in 2012, driven by demand in Asia and the  
Middle East. Global oil supplies were up moderately in 2013 by  
+0.4 Mb/d after an increase of +2.3 Mb/d in 2012. Market supplies  
remained adequate mainly due to the increase in non-conventional  
oil production in North America, whereas the persistence of  
geopolitical factors, particularly in Libya, Nigeria and Iraq, put a  
strain on OPEC production. The oil market environment in 2013  
therefore remained relatively stable with a Brent price of $108.7/b  
compared to $111.7/b in 2012.  
As announced, the intensive investment phase aimed at transforming  
the Group’s production profile by 2017 reached a peak of $28 billion  
(21.3 billion) in 2013. TOTAL financed its investments and dividends  
while maintaining a sound balance sheet and ended 2013 with a  
ratio of net debt to equity of 23%. On the strength of this financial  
soundness and in keeping with its competitive shareholder return  
policy, the Board of Directors decided to propose at the May 16,  
2014 Shareholders’ Meeting a dividend of 2.38/share for 2013,  
which represents a 3.4% increase for the remaining dividend.  
Gas spot prices remained stable in Asia in 2013, sustained by demand,  
and averaged $16/Mbtu. In Europe, gas spot prices increased by  
more than 20% from $9/Mbtu in 2012 to $11/Mbtu in 2013.  
Similarly, after a sharp drop due to the abundant supply of natural  
gas following the development of shale gas, gas spot prices in the  
United States rose by more than 30% in 2013, averaging $4/Mbtu  
compared to $3/Mbtu in 2012.  
In the downstream, 2013 saw a sharp decline in European refining  
margins, which was partly offset by a more favorable petrochemicals  
environment. Given the effect of over-capacities, the continued high  
Brent price and sluggish demand, the European Refining Margin  
Indicator (“ERMI”)(2) was $17.9/t in 2013, compared to $36.0/t  
in 2012. For their part, petrochemical margins in Europe and the  
United States increased during the year by approximately 25% on  
average as a result of lower raw material prices (naphtha in Europe  
and Asia, ethane and LPG in the United States).  
In terms of operations, the Group’s production was impacted by  
safety issues in Libya and Nigeria, the effects of which were partly  
offset by the improved situation in Yemen and by the restart of  
Elgin-Franklin in the North Sea and OML 58 in Nigeria.  
With responsibility and transparency, TOTAL reasserts the utmost  
priority it gives to the safety of operations and its commitment to  
environmental protection. Thus, the Group further improved its safety  
performance, with a 14% drop in TRIR(7) compared with 2012.  
For all of its projects conducted in a large number of countries,  
the Group also places emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility  
(CSR) challenges and the development of local economies.  
In this environment, TOTAL’s adjusted net income amounted to  
10.7 billion, slightly down from 2012. This result essentially reflects  
the decrease in net income of the Upstream segment, which was  
partly offset by the increase in net income of Marketing & Services.  
In the Upstream segment, 2013 saw the launch of major projects in  
Congo, Nigeria, Canada and Russia and the acquisition of interests in  
high-potential assets, particularly in Brazil with the acquisition of a 20%  
stake in the Libra field. TOTAL has therefore confirmed its production  
growth targets and strengthened its prospects beyond 2017. The Group  
also pursued its ambitious exploration program and made large  
discoveries in Iraq and Argentina. In 2013, the Group continued to  
extend its oil and gas acreage by obtaining licenses in promising  
exploration areas, particularly in Iraq, Brazil, Bolivia and South Africa.  
The Upstream segment’s adjusted(3) net operating income reached  
9.4 billion in 2013, a 16% decrease from the previous year,  
impacted by a less favorable production mix, an increase in technical  
costs, especially exploration expenses, and an increase in the  
effective tax rate. In 2013, the Refining & Chemicals segment  
benefited from the concrete effects of the synergy and operational  
efficiency plans and a more favorable petrochemicals environment.  
This helped offset the sharp decline in refining margins in Europe  
and allowed adjusted net operating income to remain stable compared  
with 2012. Finally, the Marketing & Services segment recorded a 39%  
increase in adjusted net operating income compared with 2012,  
thanks in particular to improved performance in New Energies,  
In the Refining & Chemicals segment, the synergy and operational  
efficiency plans yielded concrete results that, together with a more  
favorable petrochemicals environment, enabled this segment to record  
stable income despite an extremely weak refining environment in  
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
1) IEA data, excluding biofuels and refining gains.  
2) TOTAL’s margin indicator.  
3) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
4) The Group’s interest in Novatek was 16.96% at December 31, 2013.  
5) Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average exchange rate of 1.3281 $/ for the full year 2013.  
6) Including other transactions with minority interests.  
7) Total Recordable Injury Rate.  
60  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Management Report  
Summary of results and financial position  
3
Europe. The year 2013 was also marked by the start of production  
at the SATORP refinery in Saudi Arabia and by the announcement  
of the launch of a major investment program to upgrade the Antwerp  
platform in Belgium and a project to adapt the petrochemicals platform  
in Carling, France, in order to restore its competitiveness.  
and Pakistan. In 2013, the photovoltaic solar energy sector stabilized  
after two years of sharp price decreases. Against this backdrop, New  
Energies improved its competitiveness and TOTAL and SunPower  
(64.65%) announced a number of successful initiatives, including the  
start-up of the California Valley Solar Ranch solar power plant and the  
launch of new solar power plant projects in Chile and South Africa.  
In the Marketing & Services segment, the Group ’s strategy is to optimize  
its operations in Europe, strengthen its leading positions on the African  
continent and in the Middle East and expand its presence in the global  
lubricants market, while at the same time maintaining a profitability target  
of over 17%. Thus, in 2013, the Group strengthened its leadership in  
Europe by increasing its network market share with 600 Total Access  
service stations now deployed in France. TOTAL also continued its  
expansion in high-growth markets and developed its positions in Egypt  
The process initiated in 2004 to increase R&D budgets continued  
with expenditures of 949 million in 2013, up nearly 20%  
compared to 2012, with the aim, in particular, of the continued  
improvement of the Group’s technological expertise in the  
development of oil and gas resources and the development of solar,  
biomass, carbon capture and storage technologies in order to  
contribute to changes in the global energy mix.  
1
.2. 2013 Group results(1)  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Sales  
189,542  
200,061  
184,693  
Adjusted operating income from business segments(a)  
Adjusted net operating income from business segments(a)  
20,779  
11,925  
24,866  
13,351  
24,456  
12,295  
Net income (Group share)  
Adjusted net income (Group share)(a)  
8,440  
10,745  
10,609  
12,276  
12,309  
11,457  
Fully-diluted weighted-average shares (millions)  
Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share (euros)(a) (b)  
Dividend per share (euros)(c)  
2,272  
4.73  
2.38  
2,267  
5.42  
2.34  
2,257  
5.08  
2.28  
Net-debt-to-equity ratio (as of December 31)  
Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE)(d)  
Return on Equity (ROE)  
23%  
13%  
15%  
22%  
16%  
18%  
23%  
16%  
19%  
Cash flow from operations  
Investments(e)  
Divestments  
21,473  
25,922  
4,814  
22,462  
22,943  
5,871  
19,536  
24,541  
8,578  
(a) Adjusted results are defined as income using replacement cost, adjusted for special items, excluding the impact of changes for fair value from January 1, 2011.  
(b) Based on fully-diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  
(c) Dividend 2013 is subject to the approval by the Shareholder’s Meeting on May 16, 2014.  
(d) Based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed at replacement cost.  
(e) Including acquisitions.  
Market environment  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Exchange rate -$  
Brent ($/b)  
European Refinery Margin Indicator (ERMI)(a) ($/t)  
1.33  
108.7  
17.9  
1.28  
111.7  
36.0  
1.39  
111.3  
17.4  
(
a) ERMI is an indicator intended to represent the margin after variable costs for a hypothetical complex refinery located around Rotterdam in Northern Europe. The indicator margin may  
not be representative of the actual margins achieved by TOTAL in any period because of TOTAL’s particular refinery configurations, product mix effects or other specific operating conditions.  
Adjustments to operating income  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Special items affecting operating income  
Restructuring charges  
(1,237)  
(284)  
(792)  
(161)  
(56)  
(2,342)  
(2)  
(873)  
-
Impairments  
(1,474)  
(866)  
(9)  
(781)  
(92)  
Other  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Pre-tax inventory effect: FIFO vs. replacement cost(a)  
45  
1,215  
(802)  
(234)  
Total adjustments affecting operating income  
(2,095)  
(2,585)  
387  
(a) See Note 1N to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
(
1) Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012 and 2011 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated  
results is not significant (see Note 1 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
61  
Management Report  
3
Summary of results and financial position  
Adjustments to net income (Group share)  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Special items affecting net income (Group share)  
Gain (loss) on asset sales  
(1,712)  
(72)  
(1,503)  
581  
(14)  
1,538  
(122)  
(1,014)  
(416)  
32  
Restructuring charges  
(428)  
(586)  
(626)  
(44)  
(77)  
Impairments  
(1,112)  
(895)  
(7)  
Other  
Effect of changes in fair value  
After-tax inventory effect: FIFO vs. replacement cost(a)  
(549)  
(157)  
834  
Total adjustments affecting net income  
(2,305)  
(1,667)  
852  
(a) See Note 1N to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
1
.2.1. Sales  
– Changes in fair value had a negative impact on net income of  
44 million in 2013 and a negative impact of 7 million in 2012.  
Consolidated sales were 189,542 million ($251,731 million),  
a decrease of 5% compared to 2012 (200,061 million).  
– Special items had a negative impact on net income of  
1,712 million in 2013, comprised mainly of the loss on the sale  
of the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada, the impairment of  
Upstream assets in the Barnett field in the United States and in  
Syria, charges and write-offs related to the restructuring of  
Downstream activities in France, partially offset by the gain on  
the sales of TIGF and Upstream assets in Italy. Special items had  
a negative impact on net income of 1,503 million in 2012.  
1
.2.2. Operating income from business  
segments  
On average, the upstream environment remained stable compared  
to the previous year with a Brent price of $108.7/b compared to  
$
111.7/b in 2012, and an average realized gas price for the Group’s  
consolidated subsidiaries that increased by 6% to $7.12/Mbtu from  
6.74/Mbtu in 2012. In the downstream, the ERMI (European  
The effective tax rate for the Group was 56.8% in 2013 compared  
to 56.5% in 2012.  
$
refining margin indicator) decreased sharply to $17.9/t on average  
compared to $36.0/t in 2012.  
On December 31, 2013, there were 2,276 million fully-diluted  
shares compared to 2,270 million on December 31, 2012.  
The euro-dollar exchange rate averaged 1.33 $/ compared to  
1.28 $/ in 2012.  
In 2013, adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share, based on  
2
,272 million fully-diluted weighted-average shares, was 4.73  
In this context, the adjusted operating income from the business  
compared to 5.42 in 2012, a decrease of 13%.  
segments was 20,779 million, a decrease of 16% compared to  
(2)  
2
012(1). Expressed in dollars , adjusted operating income from the  
Expressed in dollars, adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share was  
$6.28 compared to $6.96 in 2012, a decrease of 10%.  
business segments was $27.6 billion, a decrease of 14% compared  
to 2012, due to a lower contribution from the Upstream segment,  
which was partially offset by a higher contribution from  
Marketing & Services.  
1
.2.4. Investments – divestments  
Investments, excluding acquisitions and including changes in non-  
current loans, were 21.3 billion ($28.3 billion) in 2013 compared to  
The effective tax rate(3) for the business segments was 55.5% in  
2
013 compared to 55.3% in 2012.  
Adjusted net operating income from the business segments was  
11,925 million compared to 13,351 million in 2012, a decrease  
18.5 billion ($23.8 billion) in 2012, an increase reflecting the investments  
for the large number of Upstream projects under development.  
Acquisitions were 3.4 billion ($4.5 billion) in 2013, comprised  
essentially of the acquisition of an interest in the Libra field in Brazil,  
an additional 6% stake in the Ichthys project in Australia, an  
additional 1.6% stake in Novatek(4), the carry on the Utica gas and  
condensate field in the United States, and the bonuses for  
exploration permits in South Africa, Mozambique and Brazil.  
of 11%. Expressed in dollars, adjusted net operating income from  
the business segments decreased by 8%.  
1.2.3. Net income (Group share)  
Adjusted net income decreased by 12% to 10,745 million in 2013  
from 12,276 million in 2012. Expressed in dollars, adjusted net  
income was $14.3 billion, a decrease of 10% compared to 2012.  
Asset sales in 2013 were 3.6 billion ($4.7 billion), comprised  
essentially of the sale of TIGF, a 25% interest in the Tempa Rossa  
field in Italy, the interest in the Voyageur upgrader project in Canada,  
some fertilizer activities, and Exploration & Production assets in  
Trinidad & Tobago. Net investments were 19.5 billion ($25.9 billion)  
in 2013, an increase of 14% compared to 17.1 billion ($21.9 billion)  
in 2012. Included in 2013 is 1.6 billion ($2.2 billion) related  
to the sale of minority equity interests in Total E&P Congo and  
Adjusted net income excludes the after-tax inventory effect, special  
items and the effect of changes in fair value:  
The after-tax inventory effect had a negative impact on net income of  
549 million in 2013 and a negative impact of 157 million in 2012.  
(
(
1) Special items affecting operating income from the business segments had a negative impact of 1,237 million in 2013 and a negative impact of 2,342 million in 2012.  
2) Dollar amounts represent euro amounts converted at the average -$ exchange rate for the period: 1.3281 $/ for the full year 2013; 1.2848 $/ for the full year 2012 and 1.3920 $/€  
for the full year 2011.  
3) Defined as: (tax on adjusted net operating income)/(adjusted net operating income – income from equity affiliates – dividends received from investments + tax on adjusted net operating income).  
(
(4) The Group’s share in Novatek was 16.96% at December 31, 2013.  
62  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Management Report  
Summary of results and financial position  
3
Block 14 in Angola, which are shown in the financing section of the  
cash flow statement.  
1.2.5. Profitability  
The ROACE for the Group for 2013 was 13%, compared to 16% in  
2012. Return on Equity for 2013 was 15%, compared to 18% in 2012.  
Expressed in dollars, net investments in 2013 increased by 18%,  
mainly due to an increase in organic investments in the Upstream  
segment.  
1.3. Upstream results  
Environment -  
liquids and gas price realizations(a)  
higher production corresponding to the increased stake in  
Novatek, and  
2013 2012 2011  
-1% for security issues in Nigeria and Libya, partially offset by  
improved security conditions in Yemen.  
Brent ($/b)  
108.7  
111.7 111.3  
107.7 105.0  
Average liquids price ($/b)  
Average gas price ($/Mbtu)  
Average hydrocarbon price ($/boe)  
103.3  
7.12  
74.8  
6.74  
77.3  
6.53  
74.9  
Reserves  
At December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
(
a) Consolidated subsidiaries, excluding fixed margins. Effective first quarter 2012, included  
over/under-lifting valued at market prices.  
Liquids (Mb)  
Gas (Bcf)  
Hydrocarbon reserves (Mboe)  
5,413  
33,026  
11,526  
5,686  
30,877 30,717  
11,368 11,423  
5,784  
In 2013, TOTAL benefited from relatively stable Upstream environment  
compared to 2012. The Group’s average realized liquids price and  
the average realized gas prices for the Group’s consolidated  
subsidiaries have respectively decreased by 4% and increased  
by 6% in 2013 compared to 2012.  
Proved reserves based on SEC rules (based on Brent at 108.02 $/b)  
were 11,526 Mboe at December 31, 2013. Based on the 2013  
average rate of production, the reserve life is more than thirteen  
years.  
Hydrocarbon production  
2013 2012 2011  
(1)  
The 2013 proved reserve replacement rate , based on SEC rules,  
was 119%.  
Liquids (kb/d)  
Gas (Mcf/d)  
Combined production (kboe/d)  
1,167  
6,184  
2,299  
1,220 1,226  
5,880 6,098  
2,300 2,346  
The 2013 organic proved reserve replacement rate(2) was 109%.  
At year-end 2013,TOTAL had a solid and diversified portfolio of  
proved and probable reserves(3) representing more than twenty  
years of reserve life based on the 2013 average production rate,  
and resources(4) representing about fifty years of production.  
In 2013, hydrocarbon production was 2,299 kboe/d, stable  
compared to 2012, essentially as a result of:  
+2.5% for start-ups and growth from new projects,  
-1% for normal decline, partially offset by lower maintenance, the  
restart of production from Elgin/Franklin in the UK North Sea and  
OML 58 in Nigeria,  
Effective July 1, 2012, the Upstream segment no longer includes  
the activities of New Energies, which are now reported with  
Marketing & Services. As a result, certain information has been  
restated according to the new organization.  
-0.5% for portfolio changes, including mainly the sale of interests  
in Nigeria, the UK, Colombia, and Trinidad & Tobago, net of  
Results  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
Cash flow from operations  
Adjusted cash flow from operations  
Investments  
17,854  
9,370  
16,457  
16,575  
22,396  
4,353  
22,056  
11,145  
18,950  
18,306  
19,618  
2,798  
22,648  
10,631  
17,044  
17,661  
20,662  
2,591  
Divestments  
Return on Average Capital Employed  
14%  
18%  
21%  
(
a) Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012 and 2011 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated  
results is not significant (see note 1 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(
(
(
1) Change in reserves excluding production (revisions + discoveries, extensions + acquisitions – divestments)/production for the period.  
2) The reserve replacement rate in a constant oil price environment of 111.13 $/b (reference price in 2012), excluding acquisitions and divestments.  
3) Limited to proved and probable reserves covered by Exploration & Production contracts on fields that have been drilled and for which technical studies have demonstrated economic  
development in a 100 $/b Brent environment, including projects developed by mining.  
4) Proved and probable reserves plus contingent resources (potential average recoverable reserves from known accumulations – Society of Petroleum Engineers – 03/07).  
(
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
63  
 
Management Report  
3
Summary of results and financial position  
Adjusted net operating income from the Upstream segment in 2013  
was 9,370 million compared to 11,145 million in 2012, a decrease  
of 16%. Expressed in dollars, adjusted net operating income from  
the Upstream segment was $12.4 billion, a decrease of 13%,  
mainly due to a less favorable production mix, higher technical  
costs, particularly for exploration, and a higher tax rate for the  
Upstream segment.  
Technical costs for consolidated subsidiaries, in accordance with  
(1)  
ASC 932 , were 26.1 $/boe in 2013 compared to 22.8 $/boe in 2012,  
notably due to increased depreciation of tangible assets relating to  
major project start-ups as well as increased exploration expenses.  
The Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE(2)) for the  
Upstream segment was 14% for the full-year 2013 compared to  
18% for the full-year 2012.  
The effective tax rate for the Upstream segment was 60.1% in 2013  
compared to 58.4% in 2012.  
1.4. Refining & Chemicals results  
Operational data(a)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total refinery throughput (kb/d)(a)  
1,719  
1,786  
1,863  
(a) Includes share of CEPSA, through July 31, 2011, and of TotalErg. Results for refineries in South Africa, French Antilles and Italy are reported in the Marketing & Services segment.  
For the full-year 2013, refinery throughput decreased by 4% compared  
to the previous year, reflecting essentially a turnaround at the Antwerp  
refinery, higher maintenance at the Donges refinery, voluntary  
shutdowns in response to weak refining margins in late 2013, and  
the closure of the Rome refinery at the end of the third quarter 2012.  
Results  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
Including Specialty Chemicals(a)  
1,329  
1,404  
440  
1,455  
1,376  
383  
609  
842  
424  
Cash flow from operations  
Adjusted cash flow from operations  
3,211  
2,239  
2,127  
2,170  
2,146  
1,318  
Investments  
Divestments  
2,039  
275  
1,944  
304  
1,910  
2,509  
Return on Average Capital Employed  
9%  
9%  
5%  
(
a) Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012 and 2011 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated  
results is not significant (see Note 1 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2013, the ERMI was on average 17.9 $/t, a decrease of 50%  
compared to 2012. Petrochemical margins remained at high levels,  
particularly in the United States.  
the implementation of planned synergies and operational  
efficiencies and to a more favorable environment for petrochemicals  
that offset the sharp decline in European refining margins.  
For the full-year 2013, adjusted net operating income from the  
Refining & Chemicals segment was 1,404 million, an increase of  
In addition, the SATORP integrated refinery in Saudi Arabia has  
begun to export refined products after the successful start-up of its  
first units.  
2% compared to the 1,376 million in 2012. Expressed in dollars,  
adjusted net operating income was $1.9 billion, an increase of 5%  
compared to 2012, despite the 50% decrease in refining margins.  
The increase was due in part to the tangible results realized from  
The ROACE(2) for the Refining & Chemicals segment was 9% for  
the full-year 2013, stable compared to the full-year 2012.  
(
1) FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 932, Extractive industries – Oil and Gas.  
(2) Calculated based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed, using replacement cost.  
64  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Management Report  
Summary of results and financial position  
3
1.5. Marketing & Services results  
Operational data(a)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Refined products sales (kb/d)  
1,749  
1,710  
1,987  
(a) Excludes trading and bulk sales, included sales of CEPSA through July 31, 2011 and of TotalErg.  
Overall for the full-year 2013, sales volumes increased by 2%  
compared to the previous year, due to growth in Africa and the  
Americas, partially offset by a decrease in Europe.  
Effective July 1, 2012, Marketing & Services now includes the  
activities of New Energies. As a result, certain information has been  
restated according to the new organization.  
Results  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Sales  
83,481  
86,614  
85,325  
Adjusted operating income(a)  
Adjusted net operating income(a)  
Including New Energies(a)  
1,596  
1,151  
(2)  
1,355  
830  
(169)  
1,199  
822  
(197)  
Cash flow from operations  
Adjusted cash flow from operations  
1,926  
1,853  
1,132  
1,192  
541  
1,103  
Investments  
Divestments  
1,365  
141  
1,301  
152  
1,834  
1,955  
Return on Average Capital Employed  
16%  
12%  
13%  
(
a) Following the application of revised accounting standard IAS 19 effective January 1, 2013, the information for 2012 and 2011 has been restated; however, the impact on such restated  
results is not significant (see Note 1 of the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
For the full-year 2013, Marketing & Services sales were 83.5 billion,  
a decrease of 4% compared to 2012.  
the performance of the New Energies, which had particularly  
negative results in 2012, as well as the overall improvement made  
in refined products marketing, particularly in emerging markets.  
Adjusted net operating income from the Marketing & Services  
segment in 2013 was 1,151 million compared to 830 million in  
The ROACE(1) for the Marketing & Services segment was 16% for  
the full-year 2013 compared to 12% for the full-year 2012.  
2012, an increase of 39% reflecting essentially the improvement in  
1.6. TOTAL S.A. results in 2013  
Net income from Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A., the parent company, was 6,031 million in 2013, compared to 6,520 million in 2012.  
1.7. Proposed dividend  
After closing the 2013 accounts, the Board of Directors decided to  
propose at the May 16, 2014, Annual Shareholders Meeting a  
the remaining 2013 dividend would increase to 0.61/share and  
be paid on June 5, 2014.  
2.38/share dividend for 2013, which represents a 3.4% increase  
(2)  
Total’s dividend pay-out ratio, based on the adjusted net income for  
for the remaining dividend . Taking into account the interim dividends  
for the first three quarters of 2013 approved by the Board of Directors,  
2013, would be 50%.  
(
1) Calculated based on adjusted net operating income and average capital employed, using replacement cost.  
(2) The ex-dividend date for the remainder of the 2013 dividend would be June 2, 2014 and the payment date June 5, 2014.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
65  
 
Management Report  
3
Liquidity and capital resources  
2. Liquidity and capital resources  
2.1. Long-term and short-term capital  
Long-term capital  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Shareholders’ equity(a)  
Non-current financial debt  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt  
73,548(a)  
25,069  
(1,028)  
71,166  
22,274  
(1,626)  
67,042  
22,557  
(1,976)  
Total net non-current capital  
97,589  
91,814  
87,623  
(a) Based on a 2013 dividend of 2.38 per share.  
Short-term capital  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Current borrowings  
Net current financial assets  
8,116  
(260)  
11,016  
(1,386)  
9,675  
(533)  
Net current financial debt  
7,856  
9,630  
9,142  
Cash and cash equivalents  
(14,647)  
(15,469)  
(14,025)  
2.2. Cash flow  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Cash flow from operating activities  
Investments  
Total divestments  
21,473  
(25,922)  
4,814  
22,462  
(22,943)  
5,871  
1
19,536  
(24,541)  
8,578  
Other transactions with minority interests  
1,621  
(573)  
Net cash flow(1)  
1,986  
5,390  
3,000  
Dividends paid  
Purchase of treasury shares  
Net-debt-to-equity ratio at December 31  
(5,485)  
(179)  
23%  
(5,288)  
(68)  
22%  
(5,312)  
-
23%  
Cash flow from operations was 21,473 million ($28.5 billion)  
a decrease of 4% compared to 2012, reflecting the decrease in net  
income, partially offset by the change in working capital between  
the two periods.  
operations was $27.0 billion, a decrease of 3% compared to 2012.  
The Group’s net cash flow(1) was 1,986 million ($2.6 billion) in 2013  
compared to 5,391 million ($6.9 billion) in 2012.  
The net-debt-to-equity ratio was 23.3% on December 31, 2013  
compared to 21.9% on December 31, 2012.  
Adjusted cash flow from operations(2) was 20,345 million in 2013,  
a decrease of 6%. Expressed in dollars, adjusted cash flow from  
(
1) Net cash flow = cash flow from operations – net investments (including other transactions with minority interests).  
(2) Cash flow from operations at replacement cost before changes in working capital.  
66  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Management Report  
Liquidity and capital resources  
3
2.3. Borrowing requirements and funding structure  
The Group’s policy consists of incurring non-current debt primarily  
at a floating rate or, if the opportunity arises at the time of an issuance,  
at a fixed rate. Debt is incurred in dollars or euros according to  
general Corporate needs. Long-term interest rate and currency  
swaps may be used to hedge bonds at their issuance in order to  
create a variable or fixed rate synthetic debt. In order to partially modify  
the interest rate structure of the long-term debt, TOTAL may also  
enter into long-term interest rate swaps.  
The Group has established standards for market transactions under  
which bank counterparties must be approved in advance, based on  
an assessment of the counterparty’s financial soundness (multi-criteria  
analysis including a review of the market capitalization and of the Credit  
Default Swap (CDS), its ratings with Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s,  
which must be of high quality, and its overall financial condition).  
An overall authorized credit limit is set for each bank and is allotted  
among the subsidiaries and the Group’s central treasury entities  
according to their needs.  
The non-current debt is generally raised by the Corporate treasury  
entities either directly in dollars or euros or in other currencies which  
are then exchanged for dollars or euros through swap issues to  
appropriately match general Corporate needs.  
To reduce the market values risk on its commitments, in particular  
for swaps set as part of bonds issuance, the Group also developed  
a system of margin call that is implemented with significant  
counterparties.  
2.4. External financing available  
As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of the major  
confirmed credit facilities granted by international banks to the Group’s  
companies (including TOTAL S.A.) was $11,581 million (compared  
with $11,328 million on December 31, 2012), of which $11,421 million  
were unused ($10,921 million unused as of December 31, 2012).  
The agreements for the lines of credit granted to TOTAL S.A. do not  
contain conditions related to the Company’s financial ratios, to its  
financial ratings from specialized agencies, or to the occurrence  
of events that could have a material adverse effect on its financial  
position.  
TOTAL S.A. has confirmed lines of credit granted by international  
banks, which are calculated to allow it to manage its short-term  
liquidity needs as required. As of December 31, 2013, these credit  
facilities amounted to $11,031 million (compared with $10,519 million  
on December 31, 2012), of which $11,031 million were unused  
Credit facilities granted to Group companies other than TOTAL S.A.  
are not intended to finance the Group’s general needs; they are  
intended to finance either the general needs of the borrowing  
subsidiary or a specific project.  
As of December 31, 2013, no restrictions applied to the use of the  
Group companies’ capital (including TOTAL S.A.) that could significantly  
impact the Group’s activities, directly or indirectly.  
($10,463 million unused as of December 31, 2012).  
2.5. Anticipated sources of financing  
Investments, working capital and dividend payments are financed  
essentially by the cash flow generated from operating activities,  
asset disposals and, if necessary, by net borrowings.  
For the coming years and based on the current financing conditions,  
the Company intends to maintain this method of financing the Group’s  
investments and activities.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
67  
 
Management Report  
3
Research & Development  
3. Research & Development  
In 2013, Research & Development (R&D) expenses amounted to  
949 million, compared with 805 million in 2012 and 776 million  
in 2011. The process initiated in 2004 to increase R&D budgets  
continued in 2013.  
– developing, industrializing and improving first-level competitive  
processes for the conversion of oil, coal and biomass resources  
to adapt to changes in resources and markets, improve reliability  
and safety, achieve better energy efficiency, reduce the environmental  
footprint and maintain the Group’s economic margins in the long  
term;  
In 2013, 4,684 people were dedicated to R&D activities, compared  
with 4,110 in 2012 and 3,946 in 2011. This is mainly due to changes  
in the scope of the Group’s activities.  
– understanding and measuring the impacts of the Group’s  
operations and products on ecosystems (water, soil, air,  
biodiversity) and recovering waste to improve environmental  
safety, as part of the regulation in place, and reduce their  
environmental footprint to achieve sustainability in the Group’s  
operations; and  
There are six major R&D focuses at TOTAL:  
developing knowledge, tools and technological mastery to discover  
and profitably operate complex oil and gas resources to help meet  
the global demand for energy;  
developing and industrializing solar, biomass and carbon capture  
and storage technologies to help prepare for future energy needs;  
– mastering and using innovative technologies such as  
biotechnologies, materials sciences, nanotechnologies, high-  
performance computing, information and communications  
technologies and new analytic techniques.  
developing practical, innovative and competitive materials and  
products that meet customers’ specific needs, contribute to the  
emergence of new features and systems, enable current materials  
to be replaced by materials showing higher performance for users,  
and address the challenges of improved energy efficiency, lower  
environmental impact and toxicity, better management of their life  
cycle and waste recovery;  
These issues are addressed synergistically within a portfolio of  
projects. Different aspects may be looked at independently by  
different divisions.  
The portfolio managed by the entity tasked with developing SMEs  
specialized in innovative energy technologies and cleantechs has  
grown regularly since 2009.  
3.1. Upstream segment  
3
.1.1. Exploration & Production  
Enhancing oil recovery from mature reservoirs and recovery of heavy  
oil and bitumen with lesser environmental impacts are also subjects  
involving very active research. In particular, new technologies for the  
exploitation of oil shales by pyrolysis are being developed, both in situ  
and ex situ.  
In addition to continuously optimizing the development of deep-  
offshore projects and gas resources, TOTAL continues to improve  
its computing, exploration, seismic acquisition and processing tools  
over the long term as well as those for the initial appraisal of  
hydrocarbon reservoirs and simulation of field evolution during  
operations, especially for tight, very deep or carbonated reservoirs.  
The oxycombustion CO capture and storage project in the depleted  
2
Rousse reservoir in Lacq (France) is now in the monitoring phase  
following the injection phase, which ended in April 2013. The Group  
now has a strong command of the methods used to characterize  
reservoirs for this type of injection. New projects will look into new  
and more economical capturing solutions.  
R&D activity has been intensified in the field of unconventional  
resources, with a strong focus on water management throughout the  
production cycle and the search for alternatives to hydraulic fracking.  
A new direction is being taken to carry out deep offshore operations  
in even deeper waters, on the one hand, and at greater distances  
for multiphase production transport, on the other hand, which is  
fully in line with the ambitious goals of Exploration & Production and  
supports major technology-intensive assets such as Libra in Brazil  
Finally, water management and the production of hydrocarbons are  
still the subject of increased R&D activities. This subject is now part  
of a larger program dedicated to acceptability.  
(see point 2.1.7.3. of Chapter 2).  
3.1.2. Gas & Power  
The program to develop new LNG solutions is continuing.  
68  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Management Report  
Research & Development  
3
3.2. Refining & Chemicals segment  
3
.2.1. Refining & Chemicals  
composites. Efforts to diversify into “green” products are focused  
mainly on bioproducts endorsed by the market: biomonomers,  
biointermediates and biopolymers. R&D is banking on polylactic  
acid for the market launch of new polymers that boast improved  
properties. In addition, the development of blends, compounds  
and composites broadens the scope of application of polylactic  
acid-based polymers.  
The aim of R&D is to support the medium and long-term development  
of Refining & Chemicals. In doing so, it contributes to the technological  
differentiation of this business through the development, implementation  
and promotion of effective R&D programs that pave the way for the  
industrialization of knowledge, processes and technologies.  
In line with the Refining & Chemicals strategy, R&D places special  
emphasis on the following four major challenges: take advantage of  
different types of feedstock, optimize the value of assets, continue  
to develop innovative products, and develop bio-sourced products.  
The medium-term strategy of the project portfolio and its deployment  
plan will facilitate Refining & Chemicals’ technological differentiation.  
With regard to biofuels, R&D has focused its efforts on gasification  
and coprocessing to produce liquid fuels from biomass. R&D is also  
particularly mindful of issues related to blends and product quality  
raised by the use of biomolecules.  
The efficient use of resources and the management of plastics at  
the end of their useful life are topics of growing interest. R&D is  
therefore developing technologies that enable plastics to be used  
more efficiently as feedstock.  
To take advantage of different types of feedstock, R&D activities  
related to the processing of more diversified crudes have increased  
significantly through a better understanding of the effect that feedstocks  
have on equipment and processes at the molecular level. R&D is  
launching ambitious new programs to develop various technologies  
for producing liquid fuels, monomers and intermediates from gas.  
3.2.2. Specialty Chemicals  
R&D has strategic importance for the Specialty Chemicals. It is closely  
linked to the needs of subsidiaries and industrial customers.  
R&D is developing know-how and technologies with a view to  
optimizing the value of assets. Its efforts mainly involve programs  
focusing on the flexibility and availability of facilities. Advanced  
modeling of feedstocks and processes helps the units overcome  
their processing-related constraints and operate in real time with  
these constraints in mind. Research conducted on catalysts is  
helping to increase their resistance to poisons, improve catalytic  
stability and extend cycle time at a lower cost. Programs are being  
set up to maximize the value of heavy residues.  
Hutchinson’s R&D is built around two key areas:  
– materials, with the development of next-generation thermoplastic  
alloys and high-performance rubber formulas, as efforts to  
protect the environment create new opportunities; and  
a shift from products to systems, based on advanced functions  
such as thermal and acoustic management.  
Bostik is focusing its research activities on three technology  
platforms: hot-melt adhesives, reactive elastomers and hydraulic  
polymer-binder systems. Based on these technologies, R&D is  
developing practical, sustainable assembly solutions that meet the  
needs of markets in terms of energy efficiency (construction, transport),  
material efficiency (health, industry) and environmental impacts  
throughout their life cycle.  
In response to concerns related to social and environmental  
acceptability, R&D focuses its efforts on reducing emissions, with  
the aim of ensuring that the facilities’ environmental impact is limited.  
In anticipation of problems that arise over the long term and the  
value of CO , R&D is developing technologies to significantly  
2
reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of carbon  
capture and conversion.  
Atotech is one of the world leaders for integrated production  
systems (chemicals, equipment, know-how and service) for  
industrial surface finishing and the manufacturing of integrated  
circuits. Given the environmental challenges related to electroplating,  
nearly half of Atotech’s R&D projects are intended to develop cleaner  
technologies and create conditions for the Sustainable Development  
of these industries.  
Product innovation is a key aspect of research on polymers. R&D  
draws on its knowledge of metallocenes and bimodality to develop  
different types of mass consumption polymers which have exceptional  
properties that allow them to replace heavier materials and compete  
with technical polymers. Value-added niche polymers are also  
being developed, whether in the form of blends, compounds or  
3.3. Marketing & Services segment  
3
.3.1. Marketing & Services  
The development of the future range of Excellium fuels, which focus  
mainly on fuel economy and “engine” cleanliness, has made it possible  
to validate and integrate new molecules (friction modifier/anti-lacquering)  
as well as a new detergent technology developed in-house.  
In 2013, in response to the roadmap and the new scope of  
Marketing & Services, R&D reorganized its business areas.  
In anticipation of changes in technologies, the main lines of research  
involve the design of new higher-quality, high-performance products  
to support the international development of the businesses: fuel  
economy (fuels, lubricants, additives), energy efficiency (bitumen),  
anticipation of regulatory changes (marine lubricants) and blending  
of bio-sourced molecules (aviation fuels and special fluids).  
The Fuel Eco lubricant range was expanded with many new products  
added to comply with the specifications of manufacturers targeted  
by the Total Lubrifiants business line. New marine lubricants for  
two-stroke engines are being developed to anticipate changes in  
fuel (very low sulfur rate in coastal areas) and emissions requirements.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
69  
 
Management Report  
3
Research & Development  
To meet energy efficiency requirements by reducing application  
temperatures, a new bitumen has been developed and released on  
the European market. The formulation of a sulfur-free specialty  
bitumen, aimed at reducing users’ exposure to H2S, is continuing.  
3.3.2. New Energies  
R&D efforts in New Energies cover both the production processes  
of SunPower cells, which aim to speed up the reduction of  
production costs, and the future generations of photovoltaic cells,  
as part of several partnerships with recognized academic research  
institutes and start-ups. In particular, TOTAL is a partner in the  
important institutional project, IPVF, launched by the Université  
Paris-Saclay.  
New formulations of broader spectrum cold flow properties  
additives that include an exclusive booster for distillates have been  
developed and are being sold. The multi-partner CAER (alternative  
aviation fuels) project certified by the Directorate General for  
Aviation has been launched. The aim of this project is to understand  
the behavior of new components, from Upstream logistics to  
Downstream turbojet operation.  
Energy production from biomass is the other major R&D challenge  
in the development of New Energies. Through its own biotechnology  
research team, the Group is taking part in a program to develop  
several production processes using biomass, and in biotechnological  
projects to transform the biomass into advanced biofuels or  
molecules that can be used in chemical applications. The Group’s  
main partnership is with Amyris, in which the Group holds a stake.  
The conditions related to the hydroprocessing of local feedstocks  
were determined based on future special fluids production units  
and the initial tests on renewable feedstock pilot programs.  
Finally, researchers have also demonstrated their know-how and  
expertise in the competitive arena by developing brand new products  
(
fuels and lubricants for racing teams that were again world  
champions in 2013), products and technologies that are later  
adapted to consumer products.  
3.4. Environment  
Environmental issues are important throughout the Group and are  
taken into account in all R&D projects. R&D’s effort is to ensure  
optimum management of environmental risk, particularly as regards:  
– detection and reduction of emissions into the air and simulation  
of their dissemination;  
prevention of soil contamination and regulatory compliance with  
regard to historical aspects and the rehabilitation of sites;  
water management, notably by reducing the use of water from  
natural continental environments and by lowering emissions in  
compliance with local, national and international regulations;  
changes in the Group’s different products and management of  
their life cycle, in particular in compliance with the REACH  
Directive.  
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by improving energy  
efficiency and the monitoring of carbon capture and storage and  
For more information, refer to Chapter 7.  
the potential effects of CO on the natural environment;  
2
3.5. R&D organization  
The Group intends to increase R&D in all of its sectors through  
cross-functional themes and technologies. Attention is paid to  
synergies of R&D efforts between business units.  
to the Group’s R&D activities. Long-term partnerships with  
universities and academic laboratories, deemed strategic in Europe,  
the United States, Japan and China, as well as innovative small  
businesses are part of the Group’s approach.  
The Group has twenty-one R&D sites worldwide and has  
developed approximately 600 partnerships with other industrial  
groups and academic or highly specialized research institutes.  
TOTAL also has a permanently renewed network of scientific  
advisors worldwide that monitor and advise on matters of interest  
Each segment is developing an active intellectual property activity,  
aimed at protecting its innovations, allowing its activity to develop  
without constraints as well as facilitating its partnerships. In 2013,  
more than 250 new patent applications were issued by the Group.  
70  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Management Report  
Trends and outlook  
3
4. Trends and outlook  
4.1. Outlook  
After reaching a peak of $28 billion in 2013, the organic investment  
budget was reduced to $26 billion in 2014, more than 80% of which  
will be dedicated to Upstream. Moreover, all the Group’s segments  
are making efforts to control their investments and reduce their  
operating costs while continuing to make safety an absolute priority.  
potential drilling in Brazil, the Kwanza Basin in Angola, Ivory Coast  
and South Africa.  
In the Refining & Chemicals segment, the productivity gains and  
synergies resulting from the ongoing restructuring should continue  
in 2014 and contribute, in a constant environment, to the improvement  
in the segment’s profitability. Also in 2014, the start-up of the last  
units of the SATORP refinery in Jubail, Saudi Arabia will make this  
new integrated platform fully operational.  
Of the $15 to 20 billion in sales targeted for the 2012-2014 period,  
the Group had already sold $13 billion(1) in assets at the end of 2013.  
The proposed sales being negotiated and reviewed should enable  
TOTAL to reach, and possibly exceed, the announced target.  
The Marketing & Services segment will develop its positions  
in the most high-growth markets and continue to optimize  
its positions in Europe. New Energies, at breakeven in 2013,  
should continue to benefit from ongoing efforts at SunPower  
focusing on productivity, development and innovation.  
In the Upstream segment, TOTAL confirmed its production growth  
targets of 2.6 Mboe/d by 2015 and the potential for 3 Mboe/d by  
2017. Nearly all the projects needed to achieve these targets are  
now either in production or in the development phase. In 2014,  
after the expiration of the ADCO license, production will benefit  
from a ramp-up of recently started projects and from the start-up  
of TOTAL-operated projects like CLOV in Angola, Laggan-Tormore  
in the UK and Ofon Phase 2 in Nigeria.  
Since the start of the year 2014, the environment has remained  
favorable in the upstream, while refining margins have continued  
to deteriorate significantly in Europe.  
The Group confirms its commitment in favor of a competitive  
policy for returns to shareholders, in keeping with its objective of  
sustainable growth.  
TOTAL is pursuing its ambitious exploration program with a stable  
budget of $2.8 billion. This program includes, in particular, high-  
4.2. Risks and uncertainties  
Due to the nature of its business, the Group’s activities remain  
subject to the usual market risks (sensitivity to the environmental  
parameters of the oil and financial markets), industrial and  
environmental risks related to its operations, and to political or  
geopolitical risks stemming from the global presence of most  
of its activities.  
to rules set by the Group’s General Management, which provide for  
regular pooling of available cash balances, open positions and  
management of the financial instruments by the Group’s General  
Management.  
Detailed information is given in the Risk Factors section (Chapter 4)  
of this Registration Document. For more information, also refer to  
the Chairman’s report in point 1.10. of Chapter 5.  
Risks relative to cash management operations and to interest rate  
and foreign exchange financial instruments are managed according  
4
.3. Sensitivity of the 2014 results to market environment(a)  
Market  
environment parameters  
Scenario  
Change  
Estimated impact  
on adjusted  
Estimated impact  
on adjusted  
operating income  
net operating income  
Dollar  
Brent  
$1.30/€  
$100/b  
$30/t  
+$0.1 per €  
+$1/b  
-1.65 B€  
+0.30 B$  
0.08 B$  
-0.95 B€  
+0.15 B$  
0.05 B$  
European refining margins (ERMI)  
+$1/t  
(
a) Sensitivities revised once per year upon publication of the previous year’s fourth quarter results. Indicated sensitivities are approximate and based upon TOTAL’s current view of its 2014  
portfolio. Results may differ significantly from the estimates implied by the application of these sensitivities. The impact of the -$ sensitivity on adjusted operating income and adjusted net  
operating income attributable to the Upstream segment is approximately 80% and 70% respectively. The remaining impact of the sensitivity is essentially in the Refining & Chemicals segment.  
(1) Including other transactions with minority interests (sale of minority equity interests in Total E&P Congo and Block 14 in Angola).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
71  
 
Management Report  
3
Significant changes  
5. Significant changes  
On February 4, 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to sell its 15%  
interest in the offshore Block 15/06 in Angola to Sonangol E&P.  
The amount of the transaction was $750 million and is subject to  
approval by the authorities.  
This information supplements the information provided in Chapter 2  
concerning the Group’s activities in Angola (point 2.1.7.1.) and in  
paragraph E) of Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
for the 2013 fiscal year (Chapter 10, point 7.).  
The accounting effects of this sale, which occurred after the close  
of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended  
December 31, 2013 by TOTAL’s Board of Directors, will be reflected  
in TOTAL S.A.’s intermediate Consolidated Financial Statements for  
the first quarter of 2014.  
Except for the events mentioned above in the Management  
Report of the Board of Directors (Chapter 3), in the Business  
overview (Chapter 2), or in the description of litigations (Chapter 4,  
point 4.) no significant changes in the Group’s financial or  
commercial position have occurred since December 31, 2013,  
the end of the last fiscal year for which audited financial statements  
have been published by the Company.  
72  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
4.Facteurs de risques  
Risk factors  
4
Risk factors  
1.  
Financial risks  
74  
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1.  
.2.  
.3.  
.4.  
.5.  
.6.  
.7.  
.8.  
.9.  
Sensitivity to market environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74  
Oil and gas market related risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74  
Financial markets related risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75  
Counterparty risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76  
Currency exposure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76  
Short-term interest rate exposure and cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76  
Interest rate risk on non-current debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76  
Sensitivity analysis on interest rate and foreign exchange risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76  
Stock market risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78  
.10. Liquidity risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78  
.11. Credit risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80  
2.  
Industrial and environmental risks  
82  
2
2
.1.  
.2.  
Types of risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82  
Management and monitoring of industrial and environmental risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84  
3.  
Other risks  
85  
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.1.  
.2.  
.3.  
.4.  
.5.  
.6.  
.7.  
.8.  
.9.  
Economic environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85  
Risks related to oil and gas exploration and production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .86  
Major projects and production growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87  
Equity affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87  
Risks related to economic or political factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87  
Ethical misconduct and non compliance risks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88  
Legal aspects of the Group’s activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88  
Critical IT system services and information security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90  
Countries targeted by economic sanctions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90  
.10. Risks related to competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93  
4.  
Legal and arbitration proceedings  
94  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
4.4.  
4.5.  
4.6.  
4.7.  
4.8.  
4.9.  
4.10  
Antitrust investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94  
Grande Paroisse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94  
Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee – Russian regions and Interneft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95  
Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95  
Libya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96  
Oil-for-Food Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96  
Italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96  
Rivunion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96  
Total Gabon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97  
Kashagan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97  
5.  
Insurance and risk management  
97  
5.1.  
5.2.  
5.3.  
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97  
Risk and insurance management policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .97  
Insurance policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
73  
Risk factors  
4
Financial risks  
1. Financial risks  
Financial risks are detailed in Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (point 7., Chapter 10).  
1.1. Sensitivity to market environment  
The financial performance of TOTAL is sensitive to a number of  
factors, the most significant being crude oil and natural gas prices,  
refining margins and exchange rates, in particular that of the dollar  
versus the euro.  
which the prices of finished products adjust to reflect these  
changes. The Group estimates that an increase or decrease in  
European refining margins (ERMI) of $1.00 per ton would increase  
or decrease the annual adjusted net operating income by  
approximately 0.04 billion ($0.05 billion(1)).  
Generally, a rise in the price of crude oil has a positive effect on  
earnings as a result of an increase in revenues from oil and gas  
production. Conversely, a decline in crude oil prices reduces  
revenues. For the year 2014, according to the scenarios retained,  
the Group estimates that an increase or decrease of $1.00 per  
barrel in the price of Brent crude would respectively increase or  
decrease the annual adjusted net operating income by approximately  
All of the Group’s activities are, to various degrees, sensitive to  
fluctuations in the dollar/euro exchange rate. The Group estimates  
that a strengthening or weakening of the dollar against the euro by  
$0.10 per euro would respectively improve or reduce the annual  
adjusted net operating income, expressed in euro, by  
approximately 0.95 billion.  
0.12 billion ($0.15 billion(1)). The impact of changes in crude oil  
The Group’s results, particularly in the Chemicals activity, also depend  
on the overall economic environment.  
prices on downstream operations depends upon the speed at  
Summary  
of sensitivities 2013(a)  
Scenario  
retained  
Change  
Estimated impact  
on adjusted  
operating income  
Estimated impact  
on adjusted net  
operating income  
Brent  
-$  
1.30 $/ + $0.10 per €  
-1.65 B€  
+0.23 B/0.30 B$  
+0.06 B/0.08 B$  
-0.95 B€  
+0.12 B/0.15 B$  
+0.04 B/0.05 B$  
100 $/b  
30 $/t  
+1 $/b  
+1 $/t  
European refining margins (ERMI)  
(
a) Sensitivities revised once per year upon publication of the previous year’s fourth quarter results. The impact of the -$ sensitivity on adjusted operating income and adjusted net  
operating income attributable to the Upstream segment are approximately 80% and 70% respectively. The remaining impact of the sensitivity is essentially on the Refining & Chemicals  
segment. Indicated sensitivities are estimates based upon assumptions of the Group’s portfolio in 2014. Results may differ significantly from the estimates implied by the application  
of these sensitivities.  
1.2. Oil and gas market related risks  
Due to the nature of its business, the Group has significant oil and  
gas trading activities as part of its day-to-day operations in order  
to optimize revenues from its oil and gas production and to obtain  
favorable pricing to supply its refineries.  
The Trading & Shipping division measures its market risk exposure,  
i.e., potential loss in fair values, on its crude oil, refined products  
and freight rates trading activities using a value-at-risk technique.  
This technique is based on an historical model and makes an  
assessment of the market risk arising from possible future changes  
in market values over a 24-hour period. The calculation of the range  
of potential changes in fair values takes into account a snapshot of  
the end-of-day exposures and the set of historical price movements  
for the last 400 business days for all instruments and maturities in  
the global trading activities. Options are systematically re-evaluated  
using appropriate models.  
In its international oil trading business, the Group follows a policy  
of not selling its future production. However, in connection with this  
trading business, the Group, like most other oil companies, uses  
energy derivative instruments to adjust its exposure to price  
fluctuations of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, power and  
coal. The Group also uses freight rate derivative contracts in its  
shipping business to adjust its exposure to freight-rate fluctuations.  
To hedge against this risk, the Group uses various instruments such  
as futures, forwards, swaps and options on organized markets or  
over-the-counter markets. The list of the different derivatives held  
by the Group in these markets is detailed in Note 30 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements.  
The potential movement in fair values corresponds to a 97.5%  
value-at-risk type confidence level. This means that the Group’s  
portfolio result is likely to exceed the value-at-risk loss measure  
once over 40 business days if the portfolio exposures were  
left unchanged.  
(1) Calculated with a base case exchange rate of $1.30 per 1.00.  
74  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Financial risks  
4
Trading & Shipping: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability  
As of December 31,  
(
M)  
High  
9.9  
Low  
3.5  
Average  
6.2  
Year end  
7.1  
2013  
2
2
012  
011  
13.0  
10.6  
3.8  
3.7  
7.4  
6.1  
5.5  
6.3  
As part of its gas, power and coal trading activity, the Group also  
uses derivative instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps and  
options in both organized and over-the-counter markets. In general,  
the transactions are settled at maturity date through physical  
delivery. The Gas & Power division measures its market risk  
exposure, i.e., potential loss in fair values, on its trading business  
using a value-at-risk technique. This technique is based on an  
historical model and makes an assessment of the market risk arising  
from possible future changes in market values over a one-day  
period. The calculation of the range of potential changes in fair  
values takes into account a snapshot of the end-of-day exposures  
and the set of historical price movements for the past two years  
for all instruments and maturities in the global trading business.  
Gas & Power trading: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability  
As of December 31,  
(
M)  
High  
9.0  
Low  
2.0  
Average  
4.0  
Year end  
5.0  
2013  
2
2
012  
011  
20.9  
21.0  
2.6  
12.7  
7.4  
16.0  
2.8  
17.6  
The Group has implemented strict policies and procedures to  
manage and monitor these market risks. These are based on  
the separation of control and front-office functions and on an  
integrated information system that enables real-time monitoring  
of trading activities.  
Limits on trading positions are approved by the Group’s Executive  
Committee and are monitored daily. To increase flexibility and  
encourage liquidity, hedging operations are performed with numerous  
independent operators, including other oil companies, major energy  
producers or consumers and financial institutions. The Group has  
established counterparty limits and monitors outstanding amounts  
with each counterparty on an ongoing basis.  
1.3. Financial markets related risks  
As part of its financing and cash management activities, the Group  
uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to changes  
in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These instruments  
are mainly interest rate and currency swaps. The Group may also  
occasionally use futures contracts and options. These operations  
and their accounting treatment are detailed in Notes 1 paragraph M,  
government institutions, deposit banks, or major companies  
through deposits, reverse repurchase agreements and purchase  
of commercial paper. Liquidity positions and the management of  
financial instruments are centralized by the Treasury Department,  
where they are managed by a team specialized in foreign exchange  
and interest rate market transactions.  
2
0, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
The Cash Monitoring-Management Unit within the Treasury  
Department monitors limits and positions per bank on a daily  
basis and results of the Front Office. This unit also prepares  
marked-to-market valuations of used financial instruments and,  
when necessary, performs sensitivity analysis.  
Risks relative to cash management operations and to interest rate  
and foreign exchange financial instruments are managed according  
to rules set by the Group’s senior management, which provide  
for regular pooling of available cash balances, open positions  
and management of the financial instruments by the Treasury  
Department. Excess cash of the Group is deposited mainly in  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
75  
Risk factors  
4
Financial risks  
1.4. Counterparty risk  
The Group has established standards for market transactions under  
which bank counterparties must be approved in advance, based on  
an assessment of the counterparty’s financial soundness (multi-criteria  
analysis including a review of market prices and of the Credit Default  
Swap (CDS), its ratings with Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, which  
must be of high quality, and its overall financial condition).  
An overall authorized credit limit is set for each bank and is allotted  
among the subsidiaries and the Group’s central treasury entities  
according to their needs.  
To reduce the market values risk on its commitments, in particular  
for swaps set as part of bonds issuance, the Treasury Department  
also developed a system of margin call that is gradually implemented  
with significant counterparties.  
1.5. Currency exposure  
The Group seeks to minimize the currency exposure of each entity  
to its functional currency (primarily the euro, the dollar, the pound  
sterling and the Norwegian krone).  
The non-current debt described in Note 20 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements is generally raised by the Corporate treasury  
entities either directly in dollars or in euros, or in other currencies  
which are then exchanged for dollars or euros through swaps  
issues to appropriately match general Corporate needs. The proceeds  
from these debt issuances are loaned to affiliates whose accounts  
are kept in dollars or in euros. Thus, the net sensitivity of these  
positions to currency exposure is not significant.  
For currency exposure generated by commercial activity, the hedging  
of revenues and costs in foreign currencies is typically performed  
using currency operations on the spot market and, in some cases,  
on the forward market. The Group rarely hedges future cash flows,  
although it may use options to do so.  
The Group’s short-term currency swaps, the notional value of which  
appears in Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are  
used to attempt to optimize the centralized cash management of  
the Group. Thus, the sensitivity to currency fluctuations which may  
be induced is likewise considered negligible.  
With respect to currency exposure linked to non-current assets  
booked in a currency other than the euro, the Group has a policy  
of reducing the related currency exposure by financing these assets  
in the same currency.  
Net short-term currency exposure is periodically monitored against  
limits set by the Group’s senior management.  
1.6. Short-term interest rate exposure and cash  
Cash balances, which are primarily composed of euros and dollars,  
are managed according to the guidelines established by the Group’s  
senior management (maintain an adequate level of liquidity, optimize  
revenue from investments considering existing interest rate yield  
curves, and minimize the cost of borrowing) over a less than  
twelve-month horizon and on the basis of a daily interest rate  
benchmark, primarily through short-term interest rate swaps and  
short-term currency swaps, without modifying currency exposure.  
1.7. Interest rate risk on non-current debt  
The Group’s policy consists of incurring non-current debt primarily  
at a floating rate, or, if the opportunity arises at the time of an issuance,  
at a fixed rate. Debt is incurred in dollars or in euros according to  
general Corporate needs. Long-term interest rate and currency  
swaps may be used to hedge bonds at their issuance in order to  
create a variable or fixed rate synthetic debt. In order to partially  
modify the interest rate structure of the long-term debt,  
TOTAL may also enter into long-term interest rate swaps.  
1.8. Sensitivity analysis on interest rate and foreign exchange risk  
The tables below present the potential impact of an increase  
or decrease of 10 basis points on the interest rate yield curves  
for each of the currencies on the fair value of the current financial  
instruments as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.  
76  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Financial risks  
4
Change in fair value  
due to a change  
in interest rate by:  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Carrying  
amount  
Estimated  
fair value  
+10 basis  
points  
-10 basis  
points  
(M)  
As of December 31, 2013  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(24,028)  
(236)  
1,028  
792  
3,784  
(1)  
(24,629)  
(236)  
1,028  
792  
3,784  
(1)  
39  
-
-
(28)  
4
(1)  
-
(39)  
-
-
27  
(4)  
1
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
13  
13  
-
As of December 31, 2012  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(21,346)  
(11)  
1,626  
1,615  
4,251  
-
(21,545)  
(11)  
1,626  
1,615  
4,251  
-
97  
-
-
(58)  
4
2
(97)  
-
-
58  
(4)  
(2)  
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
(50)  
(50)  
-
As of December 31, 2011  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(21,402)  
(146)  
1,976  
1,830  
3,488  
(1)  
(22,092)  
(146)  
1,976  
1,830  
3,488  
(1)  
83  
-
-
(49)  
3
3
(83)  
-
-
49  
(3)  
(3)  
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
47  
47  
-
The impact of changes in interest rates on the cost of net debt before tax is as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Cost of net debt  
(606)  
(571)  
(440)  
Interest rate translation of:  
+
-
+
-
10 basis points  
10 basis points  
100 basis points  
100 basis points  
(11)  
11  
(113)  
113  
(11)  
11  
(106)  
106  
(10)  
10  
(103)  
103  
As a result of the policy for the management of currency exposure previously described, the Group’s sensitivity to currency exposure is  
primarily influenced by the net equity of the subsidiaries whose functional currency is the dollar and, to a lesser extent, the pound sterling  
and the Norwegian krone.  
This sensitivity is reflected in the historical evolution of the currency translation adjustment recorded in the statement of changes in  
shareholders’ equity which, in the course of the last three fiscal years, is essentially related to the fluctuation of dollar and pound sterling  
and is set forth in the table below:  
Euro/Dollar  
exchange rates  
Euro/Pound sterling  
exchange rates  
As of December 31, 2013  
1.38  
0.83  
As of December 31, 2012  
As of December 31, 2011  
1.32  
1.29  
0.82  
0.84  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
77  
Risk factors  
4
Financial risks  
As of December 31, 2013  
Total  
Euro  
Dollar  
Pound  
Other currencies  
(M)  
sterling  
and equity affiliates  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge - open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2013  
77,014  
46,984  
23,599  
4,289  
2,142  
(4,385)  
-
-
-
(2,524)  
-
(931)  
-
(930)  
-
72,629  
Total  
46,984  
Euro  
21,075  
Dollar  
22,253  
3,358  
1,212  
As of December 31, 2012  
Pound  
sterling  
Other currencies  
and equity affiliates  
(M)  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge - open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2012  
72,689  
44,968  
4,268  
1,200  
(1,504)  
-
-
-
(782)  
-
(837)  
-
115  
-
71,185  
Total  
44,968  
Euro  
21,471  
Dollar  
21,554  
3,431  
1,315  
As of December 31, 2011  
Pound  
sterling  
Other currencies  
and equity affiliates  
(M)  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge - open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2011  
67,949  
40,763  
4,464  
1,168  
(978)  
(26)  
-
-
120  
(25)  
(931)  
(1)  
(167)  
-
66,945  
40,763  
21,649  
3,532  
1,001  
As a result of this policy, the impact of currency exchange rate  
fluctuations on consolidated income, as illustrated in Note 7 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements, has not been significant over  
the last three years despite the considerable fluctuation of the dollar  
(a gain of 6 million in 2013, a gain of 26 million in 2012 and  
a gain of 118 million in 2011).  
1.9. Stock market risk  
The Group holds interests in a number of publicly-traded companies  
see Notes 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
The market value of these holdings fluctuates due to various factors,  
including stock market trends, valuations of the sectors in which  
the companies operate, and the economic and financial condition  
of each individual company.  
(
1.10. Liquidity risk  
TOTAL S.A. has confirmed lines of credit granted by international  
banks, which are calculated to allow it to manage its short-term  
liquidity needs as required.  
amount of the principal confirmed lines of credit granted by  
international banks to Group companies, including TOTAL S.A.,  
was $11,581 million, of which $11,421 million was unused. The  
lines of credit granted to Group companies other than TOTAL S.A.  
are not intended to finance the Group’s general needs; they are  
intended to finance either the general needs of the borrowing  
subsidiary or a specific project.  
As of December 31, 2013, these lines of credit amounted  
to $11,031 million, of which $11,031 million was unused.  
The agreements for the lines of credit granted to TOTAL S.A.  
do not contain conditions related to the Company’s financial ratios,  
to its financial ratings from specialized agencies, or to the  
occurrence of events that could have a material adverse effect  
on its financial position. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate  
The following tables show the maturity of the financial assets and  
liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011  
(see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
78  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Financial risks  
4
As of December 31, 2013  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(8,116)  
(276)  
(3,370)  
(3,284)  
(3,015)  
(3,162)  
(11,210)  
(24,041)  
(8,116)  
(276)  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Assets and liabilities available  
for sale or exchange  
536  
536  
130  
14,647  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
130  
14,647  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
6,921  
(3,370)  
(3,284)  
(3,015)  
(3,162)  
(11,210)  
(17,120)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(729)  
350  
(661)  
284  
(554)  
100  
(508)  
(24)  
(447)  
(80)  
(1,294)  
(515)  
(4,193)  
115  
Net amount  
6,542  
(3,747)  
(3,738)  
(3,547)  
(3,689)  
(13,019)  
(21,198)  
As of December 31, 2012  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(11,016)  
(176)  
(3,832)  
(3,465)  
(2,125)  
(3,126)  
(8,100)  
(20,648)  
(11,016)  
(176)  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Assets and liabilities available  
for sale or exchange  
1,562  
1,562  
(756)  
15,469  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(756)  
15,469  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
5,083  
(3,832)  
(3,465)  
(2,125)  
(3,126)  
(8,100)  
(15,565)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(746)  
371  
(625)  
335  
(519)  
225  
(405)  
106  
(352)  
62  
(1,078)  
(37)  
(3,725)  
1,062  
Net amount  
4,708  
(4,122)  
(3,760)  
(2,424)  
(3,416)  
(9,215)  
(18,228)  
As of December 31, 2011  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(9,675)  
(167)  
700  
14,025  
(4,492)  
(3,630)  
(3,614)  
(1,519)  
(7,326)  
(20,581)  
(9,675)  
(167)  
700  
14,025  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
4,883  
(4,492)  
(3,630)  
(3,614)  
(1,519)  
(7,326)  
(15,698)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(785)  
320  
(691)  
331  
(521)  
221  
(417)  
120  
(302)  
55  
(1,075)  
44  
(3,791)  
1,091  
Net amount  
4,418  
(4,852)  
(3,930)  
(3,911)  
(1,766)  
(8,357)  
(18,398)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
79  
Risk factors  
4
Financial risks  
In addition, the Group guarantees bank debt and finance lease  
agreements of certain non-consolidated companies and equity  
affiliates. A payment would be triggered by failure of the guaranteed  
party to fulfill its obligation covered by the guarantee, and no assets  
are held as collateral for these guarantees. Maturity dates and  
amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements (“Guarantees given against borrowings”).  
The Group also guarantees the current liabilities of certain  
non-consolidated companies. Performance under these guarantees  
would be triggered by a financial default of these entities. Maturity  
dates and amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements (“Guarantees of current liabilities”).  
The following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities related to  
operating activities as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (see  
Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
As of December 31  
(M)  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Accounts payable  
Other operating liabilities  
including financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
Accounts receivable, net  
Other operating receivables  
(21,958)  
(5,941)  
(615)  
16,984  
7,191  
927  
(21,648)  
(5,904)  
(456)  
19,206  
6,158  
681  
(22,086)  
(5,441)  
(548)  
20,049  
7,467  
including financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
1,017  
Total  
(3,724)  
(2,188)  
(11)  
These financial assets and liabilities mainly have a maturity date below one year.  
1.11. Credit risk  
Credit risk is defined as the risk of the counterparty to a contract  
failing to perform or pay the amounts due.  
related to financial assets recorded on its balance sheet, including  
energy derivative instruments that have a positive market value.  
The Group is exposed to credit risks in its operating and financing  
activities. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is partially  
The following table presents the Group’s maximum credit risk  
exposure:  
As of December 31  
(M)  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Loans to equity affiliates (Note 12)  
Loans and advances (Note 14)  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (Note 20)  
Accounts receivable (Note 16)  
Other operating receivables (Note 16)  
Current financial assets (Note 20)  
2,577  
2,592  
1,028  
16,984  
7,191  
536  
2,360  
2,207  
1,626  
19,206  
6,158  
1,562  
15,469  
2,246  
2,055  
1,976  
20,049  
7,467  
700  
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 27)  
14,647  
14,025  
Total  
45,555  
48,588  
48,518  
The valuation allowance on loans and advances and on accounts  
receivable and other operating receivables is detailed respectively  
in Notes 14 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Upstream Segment  
Exploration & Production  
Risks arising under contracts with government authorities  
or other oil companies or under long-term supply contracts  
necessary for the development of projects are evaluated during  
the project approval process. The long-term aspect of these  
contracts and the high-quality of the other parties lead to a low  
level of credit risk.  
-
As part of its credit risk management related to operating and  
financing activities, the Group has developed margin call contracts  
with certain counterparties. As of December 31, 2013, the net  
amount received as part of these margin calls was 801 million  
(against 1,635 million as of December 31, 2012 and  
1,682 million as of December 31, 2011).  
Risks related to commercial operations, other than those  
described above (which are, in practice, directly monitored  
by subsidiaries), are subject to procedures for establishing  
and reviewing credit.  
Credit risk is managed by the Group’s business segments  
as follows:  
80  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Financial risks  
4
Customer receivables are subject to provisions on a case-by-case  
basis, based on prior history and management’s assessment of  
the facts and circumstances.  
- Trading & Shipping  
Trading & Shipping deals with commercial counterparties and  
financial institutions located throughout the world. Counterparties  
to physical and derivative transactions are primarily entities  
involved in the oil and gas industry or in the Trading of energy  
commodities, or financial institutions. Credit risk coverage is  
concluded with financial institutions, international banks and  
insurance groups selected in accordance with strict criteria.  
-
Gas & Power  
Gas & Power deals with counterparties in the energy, industrial  
and financial sectors throughout the world. Financial institutions  
providing credit risk coverage are highly rated international bank  
and insurance groups.  
The Trading & Shipping division has a strict policy of internal  
delegation of authority governing establishment of country and  
counterparty credit limits and approval of specific transactions.  
Credit exposures contracted under these limits and approvals  
are monitored on a daily basis.  
Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment and  
approval before concluding transactions and are thereafter  
subject to regular review, including re-appraisal and approval  
of the limits previously granted.  
The creditworthiness of counterparties is assessed based on  
an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial  
standing and business risks, together with the review of any  
relevant third party and market information, such as data  
published by rating agencies. On this basis, credit limits are  
defined for each potential counterparty and, where appropriate,  
transactions are subject to specific authorizations.  
Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment  
and approval prior to any transaction being concluded and all  
active counterparties are subject to regular reviews, including  
re-appraisal and approval of granted limits. The creditworthiness  
of counterparties is assessed based on an analysis of  
quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial standing  
and business risks, together with the review of any relevant  
third party and market information, such as ratings published  
by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and  
other agencies.  
Credit exposure, which is essentially an economic exposure or  
an expected future physical exposure, is permanently monitored  
and subject to sensitivity measures.  
Credit risk is mitigated by the systematic use of industry standard  
contractual frameworks that permit netting, enable requiring  
added security in case of adverse change in the counterparty  
risk, and allow for termination of the contract upon occurrence  
of certain events of default.  
Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the  
risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever  
possible and additional protective terms providing for the provision  
of security in the event of financial deterioration and the termination  
of transactions on the occurrence of defined default events are  
used to the greatest permitted extent.  
Refining & Chemicals Segment  
Credit risks in excess of approved levels are secured by means  
of letters of credit and other guarantees, cash deposits and  
insurance arrangements. In respect of derivative transactions,  
risks are secured by margin call contracts wherever possible.  
-
Refining & Chemicals  
Credit risk is primarily related to commercial receivables. Internal  
procedures of Refining & Chemicals include rules for the  
management of credit describing the fundamentals of internal  
control in this domain. Each division implements procedures  
for managing and provisioning credit risk that differ based on  
the size of the subsidiary and the market in which it operates.  
The principal elements of these procedures are:  
Marketing & Services segment  
Internal procedures for the Marketing & Services division include  
rules on credit risk that describe the basis of internal control in this  
domain, including the separation of authority between commercial  
and financial operations. Credit policies are defined at the local  
level, complemented by the implementation of procedures to  
monitor customer risk (credit Committees at the subsidiary level,  
the creation of credit limits for Corporate customers, portfolio  
guarantees, etc.).  
-
-
-
-
implementation of credit limits with different authorization  
procedures for possible credit overruns;  
use of insurance policies or specific guarantees (letters  
of credit);  
regular monitoring and assessment of overdue accounts  
(aging balance), including collection procedures; and  
Each entity also implements monitoring of its outstanding  
receivables. Risks related to credit may be mitigated or limited  
by subscription of credit insurance and/or requiring security  
or guarantees.  
provisioning of bad debts on a customer-by-customer basis,  
according to payment delays and local payment practices  
(provisions may also be calculated based on statistics).  
Counterparties are subject to credit assessment and approval prior  
to any transaction being concluded. Regular reviews are made  
for all active counterparties including a re-appraisal and renewing  
of the granted credit limits. The limits of the counterparties are  
assessed based on quantitative and qualitative data regarding  
financial standing, together with the review of any relevant third  
party and market information, such as that provided by rating  
agencies and insurance companies.  
Bad debts are provisioned on a case-by-case basis at a rate  
determined by management based on an assessment of the risk  
of credit loss.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
81  
Risk factors  
4
Industrial and environmental risks  
2. Industrial and environmental risks  
2.1. Types of risks  
TOTAL is exposed to risks related to the safety and security  
of its operations.  
the type of risk depends not only on the hazardous nature of the  
products transported, but also on the transportation methods used  
(
mainly maritime, river-maritime, rail, road and pipelines), the  
TOTAL engages in a broad scope of activities, which include, in  
particular, drilling, oil and gas production, processing, transportation,  
refining and petrochemical activities, storage and distribution  
of petroleum products, specialty chemicals and solar energy.  
These activities involve a wide range of operational risks, such as  
explosions, fires, accidents, equipment failures, leakage of toxic  
products, emissions or discharges into the air, water or soil, and  
related environmental and health risks. In the transportation area,  
volumes involved and the sensitivity of the regions through which  
the transport passes (quality of infrastructure, population density,  
environmental considerations). Most of the Group’s activities will  
also eventually require environmental site remediation, closure and  
decommissioning after production is discontinued.  
The following table shows a correlation between TOTAL’s operations  
and the most significant industrial and environmental risks:  
Activity/Risk  
Fire,  
explosion  
Leakage  
of toxic  
products  
Accidental  
pollution  
Pollution  
of soil  
and subsoil  
Emissions into  
the air, water  
and soil  
Consumer  
health  
and safety  
(a)  
Drilling  
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
-
-
-
x
-
x
x
-
Hydrocarbon production  
On-site processing of hydrocarbons  
Transport of petroleum products and chemicals  
Refining, petrochemicals  
Storage of petroleum products  
Distribution of petroleum products  
Specialty chemicals  
x
x
Solar energy  
(a) Pollution of soil and subsoil resulting from a long period of operations carried out at the site (i.e., environmental liabilities).  
The industrial events that could have the most significant impact  
are primarily:  
ultimate cost of all pending or future asbestos-related claims is not  
likely to have a material impact on the Group’s financial position.  
a major industrial accident (fire, explosion, leakage of highly toxic  
products); and  
Certain segments or activities face specific additional risks.  
TOTAL’s Upstream segment activities face, notably, risks related to  
the physical characteristics of oil or gas fields. These risks include  
eruptions of oil or gas, discovery of hydrocarbon pockets with  
abnormal pressure, crumbling of well openings, leaks that can harm  
the environment and explosions or fires. These events, which may  
cause injury, death or environmental damage, can also damage or  
destroy oil or gas wells as well as equipment and other property,  
lead to a disruption of the Group’s operations or reduce its  
production. In addition, since exploration and production activities  
may take place on sites that are ecologically sensitive (for example,  
in tropical forests or in a marine environment), each site requires a  
risk-based approach to avoid or minimize the impact on human  
health, flora and fauna, the ecosystem and biodiversity. In certain  
situations where the operator is not a Group entity, the Group may  
have reduced influence and control over third parties, which may  
limit its ability to manage and control these risks.  
large-scale accidental pollution or pollution at a particularly  
sensitive site.  
Each of the described risks corresponds to events that could  
potentially harm human health, cause death, damage property,  
disrupt business activities or cause environmental damage. The  
Group’s employees, contractors, residents living near the facilities  
or customers can suffer injuries. Property damage can involve the  
facilities of the Group as well as the property of third parties. The  
seriousness of the consequences of these events varies according  
to the vulnerability of the people, ecosystems and business  
activities impacted, on the one hand, and the number of people in  
the impact area and the location of the ecosystems and business  
activities in relation to TOTAL’s facilities or to the trajectory of the  
products after the event, on the other hand.  
Acts of terrorism against the Group’s plants and sites, pipelines,  
transportation and computer systems could also severely disrupt  
business and operations and could cause harm to people, the  
environment and property.  
The activities of the Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services  
business segments also entail additional health, safety and  
environmental risks related to the overall life cycle of the products  
manufactured, as well as the raw materials used in the  
Like most industrial groups, TOTAL is impacted by reports of  
occupational illnesses, particularly those caused by past exposure  
of the Group’s employees to asbestos. Asbestos exposure has  
been subject to close monitoring at all of the Group’s business  
segments. As of December 31, 2013, the Group estimates that the  
manufacturing process, such as catalysts, additives and monomers.  
These risks can arise from the intrinsic characteristics of the  
products involved (flammability, toxicity or long-term environmental  
impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions), their use (including by  
customers), emissions and discharges resulting from their  
82  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Industrial and environmental risks  
4
manufacturing process (such as greenhouse gas emissions), and  
from material and waste disposal (recycling, regeneration or other  
process, or waste elimination).  
These expenditures include:  
costs incurred to prevent, control, eliminate or reduce certain  
types of air and water emissions, including those costs incurred  
in connection with measures taken to address climate change;  
Contracts signed by the Group’s entities may provide for  
indemnification obligations either by TOTAL in favor of the  
contractor or third parties or by the contractor or third parties in  
favor of TOTAL if, for example, an event occurs leading to death,  
personal injury or property or environmental damage.  
remedial measures related to environmental contamination or  
accidents at various sites, including those owned by third parties;  
– indemnification of individuals or entities claiming damages  
caused by accidents or by the Group’s activities;  
With respect to joint ventures in which an entity of the Group has an  
interest and the assets of which are operated by such Group entity  
under an operating agreement between the joint venture and such  
entity, contractual terms generally provide that the operator  
assumes full liability for damages caused by its gross negligence or  
willful misconduct.  
– increased production costs and costs related to changes  
in product specifications; and  
costs related to the decommissioning of drilling platforms  
and other facilities.  
Such expenditures incurred could have a material effect on the  
results of operations of the Group and its financial position, if the  
Group’s reserves prove inadequate.  
With respect to joint ventures in which an entity of the Group has an  
interest but the assets of which are operated by a third party,  
contractual terms generally provide that the operator assumes full  
liability for damages caused by its gross negligence or willful  
misconduct.  
Furthermore, in countries where the Group operates or plans to  
operate, the introduction of new laws and regulations, stricter  
enforcement or news interpretations of existing laws and  
regulations or the imposition of tougher license requirements may  
also cause the Group’s entities to incur higher costs resulting from  
actions taken to comply with such laws and regulations, including:  
In the absence of the operator’s gross negligence or willful  
misconduct, other liabilities are generally borne by the joint venture  
and the cost thereof is assumed by the partners of the joint venture  
in proportion to their respective ownership interests.  
modifying operations;  
– installing pollution control equipment;  
implementing additional safety measures; and  
With respect to third-party providers of goods and services, the  
amount and nature of the liability assumed by the third party  
depends on the context and may be limited by contract. With  
respect to their customers, the Group’s entities ensure that their  
products meet applicable specifications and abide by all applicable  
consumer protection laws. Failure to do so could lead to personal  
injury, environmental harm and loss of customers, which could  
negatively impact the Group’s results of operations, financial  
position and reputation.  
– performing site clean-ups.  
As a further result of, notably, the introduction of any new laws and  
regulations, the Group could also be compelled to curtail, modify or  
cease certain operations or implement temporary shutdowns of  
facilities, which could diminish the Group’s productivity and have a  
material adverse impact on its results of operations.  
Crisis management systems are necessary to respond  
effectively to emergencies, avoid potential disruptions  
in TOTAL’s business and operations and minimize impacts  
on third parties and the environment.  
All TOTAL entities monitor legal and regulatory developments in  
order to remain in compliance with local and international rules and  
standards for the assessment and management of industrial and  
environmental risks. With regard to the permanent shutdown  
of an activity, the Group’s environmental contingencies and asset  
retirement obligations are addressed in the “Asset retirement  
obligation” and “Provisions for environmental contingencies”  
sections of the Group’s Consolidated Balance Sheet (see Note 19  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Chapter 10, point 7.).  
Future expenditures related to asset retirement obligations are  
accounted for in accordance with the accounting principles  
described in Note 1Q to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
(Chapter 10, point 7.).  
TOTAL has crisis management plans in place to deal with  
emergencies. However, these plans cannot exclude the risk that the  
Group’s business and operations may be severely disrupted in a  
crisis situation or ensure the absence of impacts on third parties or  
the environment. TOTAL also has implemented business continuity  
plans in order to continue or resume operations following a  
shutdown or incident. An inability to restore or replace critical  
capacity in a timely manner could prolong the impact of any  
disruption and could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s  
business and operations. For more information on the Group’s  
crisis management systems, see point 2.2.3 below.  
Laws and regulations related to climate change and its  
physical effects may adversely affect the Group’s business.  
TOTAL is subject to stringent environmental, health and safety  
laws in numerous countries and may incur material costs to  
comply with these laws and regulations.  
Growing public concern in a number of countries over greenhouse  
gas emissions and climate change, as well as a multiplication of  
stricter regulations in this area, could adversely affect the Group’s  
businesses and product sales, increase its operating costs and  
reduce its profitability.  
TOTAL’s workforce and the public are exposed to risks inherent to  
the Group’s operations that potentially could lead to loss of life,  
injuries, property damage or environmental damage and could  
result in regulatory action and legal liability against the entities of the  
Group and its officers as well as damage to the Group’s reputation.  
The regulations concerning the market for CO emission  
2
allowances in Europe, EU-ETS (European Union Emissions Trading  
System), entered a third phase on January 1, 2013. This phase  
marks the end of the overall free allocation of emission allowances:  
certain emissions, such as those related to electricity production,  
TOTAL incurs, and will continue to incur, substantial expenditures to  
comply with increasingly complex laws and regulations aimed at  
protecting worker health and safety and natural habitats.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
83  
Risk factors  
4
Industrial and environmental risks  
no longer benefit from free allowances, while for others, free  
allowances have been significantly reduced. Free allocations are  
now established based on the emission level of the top-performing  
plants within the same sector (“top 10 benchmark”) and lower-  
performing plants must purchase, at market price, the necessary  
allowances to cover their emissions over and above these free  
allocations. Moreover, the Group’s plants will need to indirectly bear  
the cost of allowances for all electricity consumed (including  
electricity generated internally at its own facilities).  
such as the authorization given to the European Commission to  
intervene at its own discretion in the allowance auction calendar  
(backloading), prices for CO allowances could increase substantially,  
2
which could have a significant adverse impact on the results of the  
Group’s refining operations. Finally, the revision in 2014 of the list of  
sectors exposed to carbon leakage represents another regulatory  
uncertainty that, if it were to affect the refining sector in Europe,  
could also have a significant adverse impact on the results of the  
Group’s refining operations.  
Given these new rules and the European Commission’s decision to  
apply a “cross-sectoral correction factor” (CSCF) that reduces the  
total amount of free allocations for all sectors combined by an  
average of 11.6% over phase 3 (2013-2020), the Group estimates  
that approximately 30% of its emissions subject to the EU-ETS will  
not be covered by free allowances during the 2013-2020 period.  
The Group is exploring possible avenues of appeal against the  
method of calculating this correction factor.  
In addition, more of TOTAL’s future production could come from  
unconventional sources in order to help meet the world’s growing  
demand for energy. Since energy intensity of oil and gas production  
from unconventional sources can be higher than that of production  
from conventional sources, the CO emissions produced by the  
2
Group’s activities may increase. Therefore, TOTAL may need to  
incur additional costs related to certain projects.  
Finally, TOTAL’s businesses operate in varied locales where the  
potential physical impacts of climate change, including changes in  
weather patterns, are highly uncertain and may adversely impact  
the results of the Group’s operations.  
The financial risk related to the foreseeable purchase of these  
allowances on the market should remain low for the Group if prices  
for emission allowances remain close to their current level (5/t CO2).  
If significant changes are made to the regulation during phase 3,  
2.2. Management and monitoring of industrial and environmental risks  
2
.2.1. TOTAL’s policies regarding health,  
– prior to approving new projects, investments, acquisitions and  
disposals;  
safety and the environment  
TOTAL has developed a “Health Safety Environment Quality Charter”  
– periodically during operations (safety studies, environmental  
impact studies, health impact studies and Technological Risk  
Prevention Plan – PPRT in France);  
(see Chapter 7, point 2.) that sets out the basic principles applicable  
within the Group regarding the protection of people, property and  
the environment. This charter is rolled out at several levels within  
the Group by means of its management systems.  
prior to releasing new substances on the market (toxicological  
and ecotoxicological studies and life cycle analyses); and  
Along these lines, TOTAL has developed efficient organizations as  
well as safety, environmental and quality management systems,  
which it makes every effort to have certified or assessed (e.g.,  
standards such as the International Safety Rating System, ISO  
based on the regulatory requirements of the countries where  
these activities are carried out and generally accepted  
professional practices.  
1
4001 and ISO 9001).  
In countries where prior administrative authorization and supervision  
is required, projects are not undertaken without the authorization of  
the relevant authorities based on the studies provided to the  
authorities.  
In most countries, TOTAL’s operations are subject to laws and  
regulations concerning environmental protection, health and safety,  
to which TOTAL ensures compliance. The main laws and  
regulations include:  
In particular, TOTAL has developed a common methodology for  
analyzing technological risks that is being gradually applied to all  
activities carried out by the companies of the Group (see Chapter 7,  
point 2.2.3.).  
1
) In Europe: IPPC and large combustion plants directives (recast  
by the IED directive), SEVESO directive, pressure equipment  
directive, water framework directive, waste directive, ETS  
directive (CO allowances), Fuel Directive, REACH (Registration,  
Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) and CLP  
2
2.2.3. Management  
(
Classification, Labelling and Packaging) regulations.  
TOTAL develops risk management measures based on risk and  
impact assessments. These measures involve facility and structure  
design, the reinforcement of safety devices and remedies of  
environmental degradations.  
2
) In France: regulations on natural and technological risks.  
3
) In the United States: OSHA/PSM (Occupational Safety and  
Health Administration/Process safety management of highly  
hazardous materials), Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act and the  
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and  
Liablity Act (also known as CERCLA or Superfund).  
In addition to developing organizations and management systems  
as described above, TOTAL strives to minimize industrial and  
environmental risks inherent in its operations by conducting  
thorough inspections and audits, training personnel and raising  
awareness among all those involved.  
2
.2.2. Assessment  
In addition, performance indicators (particularly in the areas of HSE)  
and risk monitoring have been put in place, objectives have been  
set and action plans have been implemented to achieve these  
objectives.  
As part of its policy, TOTAL assesses risks and impacts in the areas  
of safety (particularly process safety), the environment and the  
protection of workers and local residents:  
84  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Other risks  
4
Although the emphasis is on preventing risks, TOTAL takes regular  
steps to prepare for crisis management based on the risk scenarios  
identified.  
in the industry). Its efforts have led to the implementation of even  
more stringent controls and audits on drilling operations.  
Task Force 2, in coordination with the Global Industry Response  
Group (GIRG) created by the OGP (International Association of Oil  
and Gas Producers), is developing deep offshore oil capture  
systems and planning related containment operations in case  
of a pollution event in deep waters. Several of these systems were  
positioned in various parts of the world in 2013 and one of them  
was tested by TOTAL in November 2013 during a large-scale  
exercise in Angola.  
In particular, TOTAL has developed emergency plans and procedures  
to respond to an oil spill or leak. These plans and procedures are  
specific to each TOTAL affiliate and adapted to its organization,  
activities and environment and are consistent with the Group’s plan.  
They are reviewed regularly and tested through exercises (see  
Chapter 7, point 2.).  
At the Group level, TOTAL has set up the PARAPOL (Plan to  
Mobilize Resources Against Pollution) alert scheme to facilitate  
crisis management and provide assistance without geographical  
restriction by mobilizing both internal and external resources in the  
event of pollution of marine, coastal or inland waters. The PARAPOL  
procedure is made available to subsidiaries of the Group and its  
main goal is to facilitate access to internal experts and physical  
response resources.  
Task Force 3 addressed plans to fight accidental spills in order to  
strengthen the Group’s ability to respond to major accidental pollution,  
such as a blow-out or a total loss of containment from an FPSO  
(Floating Production, Storage and Offloading facility). This initiative  
has led, in particular, to a sharp increase in the volume of dispersants  
available within the Group.  
The task forces finalized most of their work in 2012 and the Group  
has continued deploying solutions to minimize such risks. Detailed  
information on TOTAL’s initiatives in the fields of safety and protection  
of the environment is provided in Chapter 7.  
Furthermore, the Company and its subsidiaries are currently  
members of certain oil spill cooperatives that are able to provide  
expertise, resources and equipment in all geographic areas where  
the Group has operations, including, in particular, Oil Spill Response  
Limited and CEDRE (Center for Documentation, Research and  
Experimentation on Accidental Water Pollution).  
The Group believes that it is impossible to guarantee that the  
contingencies or liabilities related to the above mentioned concerns  
will not have a material impact on its business, assets and liabilities,  
consolidated financial situation, cash flow or income in the future.  
Following the blow-out on the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico  
in 2010 (in which the Group was not involved), TOTAL created three  
task forces in order to analyze risks and issue recommendations.  
To manage the operational risks to which the Group is exposed,  
TOTAL maintains worldwide third-party liability insurance coverage  
for all its subsidiaries. TOTAL also maintains insurance to protect  
against the risk of damage to Group property and/or business  
interruption at its main refining and petrochemical sites. TOTAL’s  
insurance and risk management policies are described in point 5.  
of this Chapter (“Insurance and risk management”).  
In Exploration & Production, Task Force 1 reviewed the safety  
aspects of deep offshore drilling operations (well architecture,  
design of blow-out preventers, training of personnel based on  
lessons learned from serious accidents that have occurred recently  
3. Other risks  
3.1. Economic environment  
The operating results and future rate of growth of the Group  
are exposed to the effects of changing commodity prices.  
prices, notably under its long-term gas sales contracts and asset  
valuations, notably in North America;  
Prices for oil and natural gas historically have fluctuated widely due  
to many factors over which TOTAL has no control. These factors  
include:  
– cost and availability of new technology;  
governmental regulations and actions;  
global economic and financial market conditions;  
war or other conflicts;  
global and regional supply and demand;  
global and regional economic and political developments in  
resource-producing regions, particularly in the Middle East, Africa  
and South America;  
– changes in demographics, including population growth rates and  
consumer preferences; and  
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries  
– adverse weather conditions (such as hurricanes) that can disrupt  
supplies or interrupt operations of the Group’s facilities.  
(OPEC) and other producing nations to influence global  
production levels and prices;  
Substantial or extended declines in oil and natural gas prices would  
adversely affect TOTAL’s results of operations by reducing its  
profits. Sensitivity to market environment are described above and  
discussed in greater detail in point 1.1. of this Chapter 4.  
prices of unconventional energies as well as evolving approaches  
for developing oil sands, which may affect the Group’s realized  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
85  
 
Risk factors  
4
Other risks  
In addition to the adverse effect on revenues, margins and profitability  
from any fall in oil and natural gas prices, a prolonged period of low  
prices or other indicators could lead to a review of the Group’s  
properties and oil and natural gas reserves. Such review would  
reflect the Company’s view based on estimates, assumptions and  
judgments and could result in a reduction in the Group’s reported  
reserves and/or a charge for impairment that could have a significant  
effect on the Group’s results in the period in which it occurs. Lower  
oil and natural gas prices over prolonged periods may also reduce  
the economic viability of projects planned or in development,  
negatively impact the asset sale program of the Group and reduce  
liquidity, thereby decreasing the Group’s ability to finance capital  
expenditures and/or causing it to cancel or postpone investment  
projects. If TOTAL is unable to follow through with investment  
projects, the Group’s opportunities for future revenue and  
profitability growth would be reduced, which could materially  
impact the Group’s financial condition.  
However, in a high oil and gas price environment, the Group can  
experience significant increases in cost and fiscal take, and, under  
some production-sharing contracts, the Group’s entitlement to  
reserves could be reduced. Higher prices can also reduce demand  
for the Group’s products.  
The Group’s earnings from its Refining & Chemicals and Marketing  
& Services segments are primarily dependent upon the supply and  
demand for refined products and the associated margins on refined  
product sales, with the impact of changes in oil and gas prices on  
earnings on these segments being dependent upon the speed at  
which the prices of refined products adjust to reflect movements in  
oil and gas prices.  
3.2. Risks related to oil and gas exploration and production  
The Group’s long-term profitability depends on cost effective  
discovery, acquisition and development of new reserves; if the  
Group is unsuccessful, its results of operations and financial  
condition would be materially and adversely affected.  
– competition from publicly held and state-run oil and gas companies  
for the acquisition and development of assets and licenses, as  
well as from other major international oil companies (refer to point  
3.10. “Risks related to Competition”);  
A significant portion of the Group’s revenues and the majority of its  
operating income are derived from the sale of oil and gas that the  
Group extracts from underground reserves developed as part of its  
Upstream business. The development of oil and gas fields, the  
construction of facilities and the drilling of production or injection  
wells is capital intensive, requires advanced technology and moreover,  
due to constantly changing market conditions and difficult  
environmental challenges, cost projections are uncertain. In order  
for this Upstream business to continue to be profitable, the Group  
needs to replace its reserves with new proved reserves. Furthermore,  
the Group needs to accomplish such replacement in a manner that  
allows subsequent production to be economically viable. However,  
TOTAL’s ability to discover or acquire and develop new reserves  
successfully is uncertain and can be negatively affected by a  
number of factors, including:  
– increased taxes and royalties, including retroactive claims; and  
problems with legal title.  
Any of these factors could lead to cost overruns and impair the  
Group’s ability to make discoveries and acquisitions or complete a  
development project, or to make production economical. It is  
impossible to guarantee that new reserves of oil and gas will be  
discovered in sufficient quantities to replace the Group’s reserves  
currently being developed, produced and marketed. Furthermore,  
some of these factors may also affect the Group’s projects and  
facilities further down the oil and gas chain. If TOTAL fails to  
develop new reserves cost-effectively on an ongoing basis, the  
Group’s results of operations, including profits, and the Group’s  
financial condition, would be materially and adversely affected.  
The Group’s oil and gas reserves data are only estimates,  
and subsequent downward adjustments are possible. If actual  
production from such reserves is lower than current estimates  
indicate, the Group’s results of operations and financial  
condition would be negatively impacted.  
the geological nature of oil and gas fields, notably unexpected  
drilling conditions including pressure or irregularities in geological  
formations;  
the risk of dry holes or failure to find expected commercial  
quantities of hydrocarbons;  
The proved reserves figures of the Group are estimates reflecting  
applicable reporting regulations. Proved reserves are those reserves  
which, by analysis of geosciences and engineering data, can be  
estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible  
– from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under  
existing economic conditions, operating methods and government  
regulations – prior to the time at which contracts providing the right  
to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is  
equipment failures, fires, blow-outs or accidents;  
the Group’s inability to develop or deploy new technologies that  
permit access to previously inaccessible fields;  
the Group’s inability to anticipate market changes in a timely  
manner;  
adverse weather conditions;  
reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic  
methods are used for the estimation. Reserves are estimated by  
teams of qualified, experienced and trained geoscientists, petroleum  
engineers and project engineers, who rigorously review and analyze  
in detail all available geosciences and engineering data (e.g., seismic,  
electrical logs, cores, fluids, pressures, flow rates, facilities parameters).  
This process involves making subjective judgments, including with  
respect to the estimate of hydrocarbons initially in place, initial  
production rates and recovery efficiency, based on available  
geological, technical and economic data. Consequently, estimates  
of reserves are not exact measurements and are subject to revision.  
compliance with both anticipated and unanticipated  
governmental requirements, including U.S. and EU regulations  
that may give a competitive advantage to companies not subject  
to such regulations;  
shortages or delays in the availability or delivery of appropriate  
equipment;  
industrial action;  
86  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Other risks  
4
In addition, they may be negatively impacted by a variety of factors  
that are beyond the Group’s control and that could cause such  
estimates to be adjusted downward in the future, or cause the  
Group’s actual production to be lower than its currently reported  
proved reserves indicate. The main such factors include:  
– changes in tax rules and other government regulations that make  
reserves no longer economically viable to exploit; and  
the actual production performance of the Group’s reservoirs.  
The Group’s reserves estimates may therefore require substantial  
downward revisions to the extent its subjective judgments prove not  
to have been conservative enough based on the available geosciences  
and engineering data, or the Group’s assumptions regarding factors  
or variables that are beyond its control prove to be incorrect over  
time. Any downward adjustment would indicate lower future  
production amounts, which could adversely affect the Group’s results  
of operations, including profits as well as its financial condition.  
a decline in the price of oil or gas, making reserves no longer  
economically viable to exploit and therefore not classifiable as proved;  
an increase in the price of oil or gas, which may reduce the  
reserves to which the Group are entitled under production  
sharing and risked service contracts and other contractual terms;  
3.3. Major projects and production growth  
The Group’s production growth depends on the delivery  
of its major development projects.  
– unforeseen technical difficulties that could delay project startup  
or cause unscheduled project downtime;  
The Group’s targeted production growth relies heavily on the  
successful execution of its major development projects, which are  
complex and capital-intensive. These major projects are subject to  
a number of challenges, including:  
– the actual performance of the reservoir and natural field decline; and  
timely issuance or renewal of permits and licenses by  
government agencies.  
Poor delivery of any major project that underpins production or  
production growth could adversely affect the Group’s financial  
performance. In addition, many of TOTAL’s projects under  
developments are larger and more complex than past major  
projects, which increases the potential execution risk.  
negotiations with partners, governments, suppliers, customers  
and others;  
cost overruns and delays related to the availability of skilled labor  
or delays in manufacturing and delivery of critical equipment, or  
shortages in the availability of such equipment;  
3.4. Equity affiliates  
Many of the Group’s projects are conducted by equity  
affiliates. This may reduce the degree of control, as well  
as the ability of the Group to identify and manage risks.  
of the partnership, its ability to manage risks may be limited and it  
may, nevertheless, be pursued by regulators or claimants in the  
event of an incident. Additionally, the partners of the Group may not  
be able to meet their financial or other obligations to the projects,  
which may threaten the viability of a given project, and they may not  
have the financial capacity to fully indemnify the Group in the event  
of an incident.  
A significant and growing number of the Group’s projects are  
conducted by equity affiliates. In cases where a company in which  
the Group holds an interest is not the operator, it may have limited  
influence over, and control of, the behavior, performance and costs  
3.5. Risks related to economic or political factors  
TOTAL has significant production and reserves located in  
politically, economically and socially unstable areas, where  
the likelihood of material disruption of the Group’s operations  
is relatively high.  
2013 combined liquids and gas production, certain of the countries  
in which the Group has production have recently suffered from  
some of these conditions, including Nigeria, which has been the  
main contributing country to the Group’s production of hydrocarbons  
since 2012, and Libya. The Middle East, which represented 23% of  
the Group’s 2013 combined liquids and gas production, has  
recently suffered increased political volatility in connection with  
violent conflict and social unrest, including Syria, where European  
Union (EU) and U.S. economic sanctions have prohibited TOTAL  
from producing oil and gas since 2011, and Yemen. In South  
America, which represented 7% of the Group’s 2013 combined  
liquids and gas production, certain of the countries in which TOTAL  
has production have recently suffered from some of the above-  
mentioned conditions, including Argentina and Venezuela.  
Furthermore, in addition to current production, TOTAL is also  
exploring for and developing new reserves in other regions of the  
A significant portion of TOTAL’s oil and gas production and reserves  
is located in countries outside of the Organisation for Economic Co-  
operation and Development (OECD). In recent years, a number of  
these countries have experienced varying degrees of one or more  
of the following: economic instability, political volatility, civil war,  
violent conflict, social unrest and actions of terrorist groups. Any of  
these conditions alone or in combination could disrupt the Group’s  
operations in any of these regions, causing substantial declines in  
production. In addition, uncertainties surrounding enforcement of  
contractual rights in these regions may adversely impact the  
Group’s results. In Africa, which represented 29% of the Group’s  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
87  
 
Risk factors  
4
Other risks  
world that are historically characterized by political, social and  
economic instability, such as the Caspian Sea region where TOTAL  
has large projects currently underway. The occurrence and magnitude  
of incidents related to economic, social and political instability are  
unpredictable. It is possible that they could have a material adverse  
impact on the Group’s production and operations in the future  
and/or cause certain investors to reduce their holdings of TOTAL’s  
securities.  
countries, increasing the costs and uncertainties of the Group’s  
business operations, which is a trend TOTAL expects to continue.  
Potential increasing intervention by governments in such countries  
can take a wide variety of forms, including:  
– the award or denial of exploration and production interests;  
the imposition of specific drilling obligations;  
price and/or production quota controls and export limits;  
TOTAL, like other major international energy companies, has a  
geographically diverse portfolio of reserves and operational sites,  
which allows it to conduct its business and financial affairs so as to  
reduce its exposure to political and economic risks. However, there  
can be no assurance that such events will not have a material  
adverse impact on the Group.  
– nationalization or expropriation of assets;  
unilateral cancellation or modification of license or contract rights;  
– increases in taxes and royalties, including retroactive claims;  
the renegotiation of contracts;  
payment delays; and  
The Group’s operations throughout emerging countries are  
subject to intervention by the governments of these countries,  
which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.  
– currency exchange restrictions or currency devaluation.  
TOTAL has significant exploration and production activities, and in  
some cases refining, marketing or chemicals operations, in developing  
countries whose governmental and regulatory framework is subject  
to unexpected change and where the enforcement of contractual  
rights is uncertain. In addition, the Group’s exploration and production  
activity in such countries is often done in conjunction with state-  
owned entities, for example as part of a joint venture, where the  
state has a significant degree of control. In recent years, in various  
regions globally, TOTAL has seen governments and state-owned  
enterprises imposing more stringent conditions on companies  
pursuing exploration and production activities in their respective  
Imposition of any of these factors by a host government in a  
developing country where TOTAL has substantial operations,  
including exploration, could cause the Group to incur material costs  
or cause the Group’s production or value of the Group’s assets to  
decrease, potentially having a material adverse effect on its results  
of operations, including profits.  
For example, the Nigerian government has been contemplating  
new legislation to govern the petroleum industry which, if passed  
into law, could have an impact on the existing and future activities  
of the Group in that country through increased taxes and/or costs  
of operation and could adversely affect financial returns from  
projects in that country.  
3.6. Ethical misconduct and non compliance risks  
Ethical misconduct or breaches of applicable laws by the  
Group’s employees could expose TOTAL to criminal and civil  
penalties and be damaging to TOTAL’s reputation and  
shareholder value.  
reputation and shareholder value. In addition, ethical misconduct  
or non-compliance with applicable law may lead the competent  
authorities to impose other measures, such as the appointment  
of an independent monitor in charge of reviewing the Group’s  
compliance and internal control procedures and, if need be,  
recommending improvements of such procedures. Regarding  
this point, refer to point 4. in Chapter 4 Legal and arbitration  
proceedings – Iran for an overview of the settlements between  
TOTAL, the SEC and the Department of Justice (DoJ) providing  
for the appointment of an independent monitor, who was appointed  
in late 2013.  
The Code of Conduct of the Group, which applies to all of its  
employees, defines the Group’s commitment to integrity,  
compliance with all applicable legal requirements, high ethical  
standards and the behaviors and actions the Group expects of the  
businesses and people of the Group wherever it operates. Ethical  
misconduct or non-compliance with applicable laws and  
regulations, including non-compliance with anti-bribery and  
anticorruption laws, by TOTAL, its partners, agents or others that  
act on the Group’s behalf, could expose TOTAL and its employees  
to criminal and civil penalties and could be damaging to TOTAL’s  
The Group has been deploying ethics and compliance programs  
since 2009, as a priority of the General Management. Refer to point  
1.10.1. in Chapter 5 of this Registration Document for more details.  
3.7. Legal aspects of the Group’s activities  
3
.7.1. Legal aspects of the Upstream  
rates. The terms of the concessions, licenses, permits and  
contracts governing the Group’s ownership of oil and gas interests  
vary from country to country. These concessions, licenses, permits  
and contracts are generally granted by or entered into with a  
government entity or a state-owned company and are sometimes  
entered into with private owners. These arrangements usually take  
the form of concessions or production sharing contracts.  
segment’s activities  
TOTAL’s Upstream segment conducts activities in various countries  
which are therefore subject to a broad range of regulations.  
These cover virtually all aspects of exploration and production  
operations, including leasehold rights, production rates, royalties,  
environmental protection, exports, taxes and foreign exchange  
88  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Other risks  
4
In the framework of oil concession agreements, the oil company  
owns the assets and the facilities and is entitled to the entire  
production.  
contracts granted by or entered into with a government entity, a  
state-owned company or, sometimes, private owners, is subject to  
certain risks that, in certain cases, can reduce or challenge the  
protections offered by this legal framework.  
In exchange, the operating risks, costs and investments are the oil  
company’s responsibility and it agrees to remit to the relevant State,  
usually the owner of the subsoil resources, a production-based  
royalty, income tax, and possibly other taxes that may apply under  
local tax legislation.  
3
.7.2. Legal aspects of the Group’s  
other activities  
The activities of the Group’s Refining & Chemicals and Marketing &  
Services are also subject to a wide range of regulations.  
The production sharing contract (PSC) involves a more complex  
legal framework than the concession agreement: it defines the terms  
and conditions of production sharing and sets the rules governing  
the cooperation between the Company or consortium in possession  
of the license and the host State, which is generally represented by  
a state-owned company. The latter can thus be involved in operating  
decisions, cost accounting and production allocation.  
In European countries and in the United States, sites and products  
are subject to environmental (water, air, soil, noise, protection of  
biodiversity, waste management, impact studies, etc.), health  
(on-the-job safety, chemical product risks) and safety (safety of  
personnel and residents, major risk facilities) regulations.  
Product quality and consumer protection are also subject to  
regulations. Within the European Union, EU regulations must be  
transposed into Member States’ national laws or directly enforced.  
In such Member States, EU legislation and regulations may be in  
addition to national and local government regulations. In addition, in  
all Member States of the European Union, industrial facilities operate  
pursuant to licenses issued by competent local authorities that are  
based on national laws and EU regulations. It is the same in the  
United States, where federal rules are in addition to those of the  
various states.  
The consortium agrees to undertake and finance all exploration,  
development and production activities at its own risk. In exchange,  
it is entitled to a portion of the production, known as “cost oil”, the  
sale of which should cover all of these expenses (investments and  
operating costs). The balance of production, known as “profit oil”,  
is then shared in varying proportions, between the Company or  
consortium, on the one hand, and with the State or the state-owned  
company, on the other hand.  
In some instances, concession agreements and PSCs coexist,  
sometimes in the same country. Even though there are other  
contractual models, TOTAL’s license portfolio is comprised mainly  
of concession agreements.  
In other countries where the Group operates, legislation is often  
inspired by EU and U.S. regulations. These countries may more  
fully develop certain aspects of regulation in particular fields, for  
example those relating to protecting water, nature and health.  
In every country, the authorities of the host State, often assisted by  
international accounting firms, perform joint venture and PSC cost  
audits and ensure the observance of contractual obligations.  
Irrespective of the particular country in which the Group operates,  
TOTAL has developed standards based on best practices existing  
in countries with strong regulations and progressively upgrades  
policies with respect to these standards.  
In some countries, TOTAL has also signed contracts called “risked  
service contracts”, which are similar to production sharing contracts.  
However, the profit oil is replaced by risked monetary remuneration,  
agreed by contract, which depends notably on the field performance.  
For example, the remuneration under the Halfaya Iraqi contract is  
based on an amount calculated per barrel produced.  
In addition, depending on the country where the Group operates,  
its other activities are subject to specific sector requirements that  
impose constraints with respect to, for example, strategic oil  
reserves holding requirements or and shipping capacities owned  
or in chartered.  
Oil and gas exploration and production activities are subject to  
authorization granted by public authorities (licenses), which are granted  
for specific and limited periods of time and include an obligation to  
return a large portion, or the entire portion in case of failure, of the  
area covered by the license at the end of the exploration period.  
3.7.3. Competition law  
Competition laws apply to the Group’s companies in the vast  
majority of countries in which it does business. Violations of  
competition laws carry fines and expose the Group and its  
employees to criminal sanctions and civil suits. Furthermore, it is  
now common for persons or corporations allegedly injured by  
violations of competition laws to sue for damages.  
TOTAL pays taxes on income generated from its oil and gas  
production and sales activities under its concessions, production  
sharing contracts and risked service contracts, as provided for by  
local regulations. In addition, depending on the country, TOTAL’s  
production and sales activities may be subject to a number of other  
taxes, fees and withholdings, including special petroleum taxes and  
fees. The taxes imposed on oil and gas production and sales  
activities may be substantially higher than those imposed on other  
industrial or commercial businesses.  
Some of the Group’s business segments have already been  
implementing competition law conformity plans for a long time.  
In 2012, a Group policy for compliance with competition law and  
prevention of violations in this area (refer to Chapter 5, point 1.10.1  
for more details) was adopted. Its deployment is based on a  
dedicated organization, the involvement of hierarchies and staff,  
and a warning process.  
The legal framework of TOTAL’s exploration and production  
activities, established through concessions, licenses, permits and  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
89  
Facteurs de risques  
4
Other risks  
3.8. Critical IT system services and information security  
Disruption of the Group’s critical IT services or breaches of  
information security could adversely affect its operations.  
potentially having a material adverse effect on the Group’s results of  
operations, including profits.  
The businesses of the Group depend heavily on the reliability and  
security of its information technology (“IT”) systems. If the integrity  
of the IT systems were compromised due to, for example, technical  
failure or cyber attack, the business operations and assets of the  
Group could sustain serious damage, material intellectual property  
could be divulged and, in some cases, personal injury,  
The Information Technology Department has developed and  
distributed governance and security rules that describe the  
recommended infrastructure, organization and procedures to  
maintain information systems that are appropriate to the organization’s  
needs and to limit information security risks. These rules are  
implemented across TOTAL under the responsibility of the various  
business segments.  
environmental harm and regulatory violations could occur,  
3.9. Countries targeted by economic sanctions  
TOTAL has activities in certain countries that are targeted by  
economic sanctions under relevant U.S. and EU laws, and if  
the Group’s activities are not conducted in accordance with  
the relevant conditions, TOTAL could be sanctioned or  
otherwise penalized.  
2008, TOTAL’s position has consisted essentially in being  
reimbursed for its past investments as part of buyback contracts  
signed between 1995 and 1999 with respect to permits on which  
the Group is no longer the operator. Since 2011, TOTAL has had  
no production in Iran.  
The United States has adopted various laws and regulations  
designed to restrict trade with Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria, and the  
U.S. Department of State has identified these countries as state  
sponsors of terrorism. The European Union (“EU”) has similar  
restrictions with respect to Iran and Syria. A violation of these laws  
or regulations could result in criminal and material financial  
penalties, including being prohibited from transacting in U.S.  
dollars. The Group currently has limited marketing and trading  
activities in Cuba and a limited presence in Iran and Syria (for more  
information, see point 3.9.2. below). Since the independence of the  
Republic of South Sudan on July 9, 2011, TOTAL is no longer  
present in Sudan.  
ISA was amended in July 2010 by the Comprehensive Iran  
Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010 (“CISADA”),  
which expanded both the list of activities with Iran that could lead  
to sanctions and the list of sanctions available. In particular,  
CISADA authorized sanctions for knowingly providing refined  
petroleum products above certain monetary thresholds to Iran and  
for providing goods, services, technology, information or support  
that could directly and significantly either facilitate Iran’s domestic  
production of refined petroleum products or contribute to Iran’s  
ability to import refined petroleum products. TOTAL had already  
discontinued potentially sanctionable sales of refined petroleum  
products to Iran prior to CISADA’s enactment. On September 30,  
2010, the U.S. State Department announced that the U.S.  
3
.9.1. U.S. and European restrictions  
government, pursuant to the “Special Rule” provision of ISA added  
by CISADA that allows it to avoid making a determination of  
sanctionability under ISA with respect to any party that provides  
certain assurances, would not make such a determination with  
respect to TOTAL. The U.S. State Department further indicated at  
that time that, as long as TOTAL acts in accordance with its  
commitments, TOTAL will not be regarded as a company of  
concern for its past Iran-related activities.  
With respect to Iran, the United States has adopted a number of  
measures since 1996 that provide for the possible imposition of  
sanctions against non-U.S. companies engaged in certain activities  
in and with Iran, including in Iran’s energy sector. The United States  
first adopted legislation in 1996 authorizing sanctions against non-  
U.S. companies doing business in Iran and Libya (the Iran and  
Libya Sanctions Act, referred to as “ILSA”). In 2006, ILSA was  
amended to concern only business in Iran (then renamed the Iran  
Sanctions Act, referred to as “ISA”). Pursuant to ISA, which as  
described below has since been amended and expanded, the  
President of the United States is authorized to initiate an  
investigation into the activities of non-U.S. companies in Iran’s  
energy sector and to consider the possible imposition of sanctions  
against persons found, amongst other activities, to have knowingly  
made investments of $20 million or more in any 12-month period in  
the petroleum sector in Iran. In May 1998, the U.S. government  
waived the application of ISA sanctions for TOTAL’s investment in  
the South Pars gas field. This waiver, which has not been modified  
since it was granted, does not address any of TOTAL’s other  
activities in Iran. In each of the years between the passage of ILSA  
and 2007, TOTAL made investments in Iran in excess of $20 million  
Since the applicability of the “Special Rule” to TOTAL was announced  
by the U.S. State Department, the United States has imposed a number  
of additional measures targeting activities in Iran. On November 21,  
2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13590, which  
authorized sanctions for knowingly, on or after November 21, 2011,  
selling, leasing, or providing to Iran goods, services, technology or  
support above certain monetary thresholds that could directly and  
significantly contribute to the maintenance or expansion of Iran’s ability  
to develop petroleum resources located in Iran, or domestic production  
of petrochemical products. TOTAL does not conduct activities in  
Iran that it believes would be sanctionable under Executive Order  
13590. In any event, there is no provision in Executive Order 13590  
that modifies the aforementioned “Special Rule”, and the U.S. State  
Department issued guidance that completion of existing contracts  
is not sanctionable under Executive Order 13590.  
(excluding the investments made as part of the development of  
South Pars). These investments will not be subject to investigation  
by the U.S. authorities due to the application of the Special Rule  
granted on September 30, 2010, as further described below. Since  
On July 30, 2012, President Obama issued Executive Order 13622,  
which authorized sanctions for, amongst other activities, (i) knowingly,  
on or after July 30, 2012, engaging in a significant transaction for  
90  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Other risks  
4
the purchase or acquisition of petroleum, petroleum products or  
petrochemical products from Iran, or (ii) materially assisting, sponsoring  
or providing financial, material, or technological support for, or  
goods or services in support of, the National Iranian Oil Company, the  
Naftiran Intertrade Company (“NICO”), or the Central Bank of Iran.  
There is no provision in Executive Order 13622 that modifies the  
aforementioned “Special Rule”. In addition, Executive Order 13622  
contains an exception for the Shah Deniz gas field pipeline project,  
in which TOTAL (10%) and NICO (10%) participate, to supply  
natural gas from the Shah Deniz gas field in Azerbaijan to Europe  
and Turkey. This Executive Order was amended and expanded by  
Executive Order 13645 (discussed in further detail below), in order  
to capture as potentially sanctionable conduct a wider range of  
petroleum-related activities. TOTAL does not conduct activities that  
it believes would be sanctionable under Executive Order 13622 as  
amended by Executive Order 13645.  
which, in addition to amending Executive Order 13622 as discussed  
above, implements certain provisions of IFCA and authorizes  
additional sanctions against, amongst other things, foreign financial  
institutions that engage in certain transactions, potentially including  
those for the sale, supply, or transfer to or from Iran of natural gas,  
and for the purchase of petroleum or petroleum products from Iran.  
TOTAL does not conduct activities that it believes would be  
sanctionable under IFCA, NDAA 2012 or Executive Order 13645.  
Also with regard to Iran, France and the EU have adopted measures,  
based on United Nations Security Council resolutions, which restrict  
the movement of certain individuals and goods to or from Iran as  
well as certain financial transactions with Iran, in each case when  
such individuals, goods or transactions are related to nuclear proliferation  
and weapons activities or likely to contribute to their development.  
In July and October 2010, the EU adopted new restrictive measures  
regarding Iran. Among other things, the supply of key equipment and  
technology in the following sectors of the oil and gas industry in Iran  
are prohibited: refining, Liquefied Natural Gas, exploration and  
production. The prohibition extends to technical assistance, training  
and financial assistance in connection with such items. Extension of  
loans or credit to, acquisition of shares in, entry into joint ventures with  
or other participation in enterprises in Iran (or Iranian-owned enterprises  
outside of Iran) engaged in any of the targeted sectors also is prohibited.  
Moreover, with respect to restrictions on transfers of funds and on  
financial services, any transfer of at least 40,000 or equivalent to  
or from an Iranian individual or entity shall require a prior authorization  
of the competent authorities of the EU Member States. TOTAL  
conducts its activities in compliance with these EU measures.  
On August 10, 2012, President Obama signed into law the Iran Threat  
Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (“ITRA”), which,  
amongst other things, amended ISA and CISADA. ITRA, like CISADA  
before it, expanded both the list of activities with Iran that could  
lead to sanctions and the list of sanctions available. Amongst other  
things, ITRA authorized sanctions for (i) the provision to Iran of goods,  
services, technology, information or support above a certain market  
value that could directly and significantly facilitate the maintenance  
or expansion of Iran’s domestic production of refined petroleum  
products, including any direct and significant assistance with the  
construction, modernization, or repair of petroleum refineries or  
infrastructure directly associated with petroleum refineries, (ii)  
participation in a joint venture established on or after January 1, 2002  
with respect to the development of petroleum resources outside of  
Iran where either the Government of Iran is a substantial partner or  
investor or where the joint venture could enhance Iran’s ability to  
develop petroleum resources in Iran, and (iii) owning, operating,  
controlling or insuring a vessel used to transport crude oil from Iran  
to another country. ITRA also contains an exception for the Shah  
Deniz gas field project. TOTAL does not conduct activities that it  
believes would be sanctionable under ITRA.  
On January 23, 2012, the Council of the EU prohibited the purchase,  
import and transport of Iranian oil and petroleum and petrochemical  
products by European persons and by entities constituted under  
the laws of an EU Member State. Prior to that date, TOTAL had  
ceased these now-prohibited activities.  
With respect to Syria, the EU adopted measures in May 2011 with  
criminal and financial penalties that prohibit the supply of certain  
equipment to Syria, as well as certain financial and asset transactions  
with respect to a list of named individuals and entities. These measures  
apply to European persons and to entities constituted under the laws  
of an EU Member State. In September 2011, the EU adopted further  
measures, including, notably, a prohibition on the purchase, import  
or transportation from Syria of crude oil and petroleum products.  
Since early September 2011, the Group ceased to purchase  
hydrocarbons from Syria. On December 1, 2011, the EU extended  
sanctions against, among others, three state-owned Syrian oil firms,  
including General Petroleum Corporation, TOTAL’s co-contracting  
partner in the production sharing agreement signed in 1988  
ITRA also added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of  
1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), which requires TOTAL to  
disclose whether it or any of its affiliates has engaged during the  
calendar year in certain Iran-related activities, including those targeted  
under ISA, without regard to whether such activities are sanctionable  
under ISA, and any transaction or dealing with the Government of  
Iran that is not conducted pursuant to a specific authorization of  
the U.S. government (see point 3.9.2., below). For any annual  
report that contains responsive Section 13(r) disclosure, an “Iran  
Notice” is separately filed with the United States Securities and  
Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC must notify the President  
and U.S. Congress, and the President must initiate an investigation  
and make a sanctions determination within 180 days after initiating  
the investigation. TOTAL believes that its Iran-related activities  
required to be disclosed by Section 13(r) are not sanctionable,  
and TOTAL has not been informed that it is at risk of possible  
imposition of sanctions for activities previously disclosed.  
(
Deir Es Zor licence) and the Tabiyeh contract. The United States also  
has various measures regarding Syria. Since early December 2011,  
the Group has ceased its activities that contribute to oil and gas  
production in Syria.  
In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets  
Control (referred to as “OFAC”) administers and enforces economic  
sanctions programs, some of which are based on the United Nations  
Security Council resolutions referred to above, against targeted  
foreign countries, territories, entities and individuals (including those  
engaged in activities related to terrorism or the proliferation of weapons  
of mass destruction and other threats to the national security,  
foreign policy or economy of the United States). The activities that  
are restricted depend on the sanctions program and targeted country  
or parties, and civil and/or criminal penalties, imposed on a per  
transaction basis, can be substantial. These OFAC sanctions  
The United States has adopted other sanctions measures, including  
the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (“NDAA  
2012”),which authorizes the imposition of sanctions on foreign financial  
institutions engaged in certain transactions, the Iran Freedom and  
Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (“IFCA”), which, amongst other  
things, authorizes the imposition of sanctions on entities that knowingly  
provided goods or services to the energy, shipbuilding, and shipping  
sectors, or to port operations, of Iran, and Executive Order 13645,  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
91  
Facteurs de risques  
4
Other risks  
generally apply to U.S. persons and activities taking place in the  
United States or that are otherwise subject to U.S. jurisdiction.  
Sanctions administered by OFAC target, among others, Cuba, Iran,  
Sudan and Syria. TOTAL does not believe that these sanctions are  
applicable to any of its activities in the OFAC-targeted countries.  
The Group has no exploration and production activities in Iran and  
maintains a local office in Iran solely for non-operational functions.  
Some payments are yet to be reimbursed to the Group with respect  
to past expenditures and remuneration under buyback contracts  
entered into between 1997 and 1999 with the National Iranian Oil  
Company (“NIOC”) for the development of the South Pars 2&3 and  
Dorood fields. With respect to these contracts, development  
operations have been completed and the Group is no longer involved  
in the operation of these fields. In 2013, Total E&P Iran (100%),  
Elf Petroleum Iran (99.8%), Total Sirri (100%) and Total South Pars  
Moreover, many U.S. states have adopted legislation requiring state  
pension funds to divest themselves of securities in any company with  
active business operations in Iran, and state contracts not to be  
awarded to such companies. State insurance regulators have adopted  
similar initiatives relating to investments by insurance companies in  
companies doing business with the Iranian oil and gas, nuclear and  
defense sectors. If TOTAL’s presence in Iran were determined to fall  
within the prohibited scope of these laws, and TOTAL were not to  
qualify for any available exemptions, certain U.S. institutions holding  
interests in TOTAL may be required to sell their interests. If significant,  
sales of securities resulting from such laws and/or regulatory initiatives  
could have an adverse effect on the prices of TOTAL’s securities.  
(99.8%) collectively made payments of less than 0.5 million to (i)  
the Iranian administration for taxes and social security contributions  
concerning the personnel of the aforementioned local office and  
residual buyback contract-related obligations, and (ii) Iranian public  
entities for payments with respect to the maintenance of the  
aforementioned local office (e.g., utilities, telecommunications).  
TOTAL expects similar payments to be made in 2014, and it did not  
recognize any revenues or profits from the aforementioned in 2013.  
TOTAL continues to closely monitor legislative and other  
developments in France, the EU and the United States, including  
the Joint Plan of Action recently announced among Iran and the P5+1  
countries (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United  
States of America, as well as Germany) regarding limits on Iran’s nuclear  
activities and the suspension of certain United States and European  
Union sanctions regarding Iran, in order to determine whether its limited  
activities or presence in sanctioned or potentially sanctioned  
jurisdictions could subject TOTAL to the application of sanctions.  
In 2013, as part of its ongoing global strategy for the protection of  
its intellectual property, TOTAL paid taxes of approximately 1,500  
to the Iranian national intellectual property office with respect to  
patents filed in Iran prior to 2013. The Group anticipates paying  
similar taxes in the future.  
Total E&P UK Limited (“TEP UK”), a wholly-owned affiliate of TOTAL,  
had limited contacts in 2013 with the Iranian Oil Company UK Ltd  
(“IOC”), a subsidiary of NIOC. These contacts related to agreements  
governing certain transportation, processing and operation services  
formerly provided to a joint venture at the Rhum field in the UK, co-  
owned by BP (50%, operator) and IOC (50%), by a joint venture at the  
Bruce field between BP (37%, operator), TEP UK (43.25%), BHP  
Billiton Petroleum Great Britain Ltd (16%) and Marubeni Oil & Gas  
(North Sea) Limited (3.75%) and by TEP UK’s Frigg UK Association  
pipeline (100%). To TOTAL’s knowledge, no services have been  
provided under the aforementioned agreements since  
TOTAL is also closely monitoring developments of the situation in  
Crimea and any related regulations and/or economic sanctions that  
could be adopted by the authorities.  
TOTAL cannot assure that current or future regulations or developments  
will not have a negative impact on its business or reputation.  
3.9.2. Cuba, Iran and Syria  
November 2010, when the Rhum field stopped production following  
the adoption of EU sanctions, other than critical safety-related  
services (i.e., monitoring and marine inspection of the Rhum facilities),  
which are permitted by EU sanctions regulations. These agreements  
led to the signature in 2005 of an agreement by TEP UK and Naftiran  
Intertrade Co. (“NICO”) (IOC’s parent company and a subsidiary of  
NIOC) for the purchase by TEP UK of Rhum field natural gas liquids  
from NICO. This agreement was terminated by TEP UK with effect  
from December 2013 and, prior to that, there had been no purchases  
under this agreement since November 2010. TEP UK’s contacts with  
IOC and NICO in 2013 in regard to the aforementioned agreements  
were limited to exchanging letters and notifications regarding contract  
administration and declarations of force majeure. TOTAL did not  
recognize any revenues or profits from the aforementioned in 2013.  
Furthermore, on October 22, 2013, the UK government notified IOC of  
its decision to apply a temporary management scheme to IOC’s  
interest in the Rhum field within the meaning of UK Regulations 3 and  
Provided in this section is certain information relating to TOTAL’s  
activities in Cuba and its presence in Iran and Syria. For more  
information on U.S. and EU restrictions relevant to TOTAL in these  
jurisdictions, see point 3.9.1. above.  
Cuba  
In 2013, Marketing & Services had limited marketing activities for  
the sale of specialty products to non-state entities in Cuba and paid  
taxes of approximately 425,000 on such activities. Hutchinson, a  
Refining & Chemicals affiliate, had limited sales in Cuba of transmission  
belts for agricultural machinery via a government-controlled  
intermediary that received a commission of approximately 77,000.  
In addition, Trading & Shipping purchased hydrocarbons pursuant  
to spot contracts from a state-controlled entity for approximately  
101 million and sold energy options to this state-controlled entity  
for approximately 4 million.  
5
of the Hydrocarbons (Temporary Management Scheme) Regulations  
Iran  
2013 (the “Hydrocarbons Regulations”). On December 6, 2013, the  
UK government further authorized TEP UK, among others, under Article  
Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  
requires the Company to disclose whether it or any of its affiliates  
engaged during the 2013 calendar year in certain Iran-related  
activities. While TOTAL has not engaged in any activity that would  
be required to be disclosed pursuant to subparagraphs (a), (b), (c),  
43a of EU Regulation 267/2012, as amended by 1263/2012 and  
under Regulation 9 of the Hydrocarbons Regulations, to carry out  
activities in relation to the operation and production of the Rhum field.  
As a result, TEP UK does not anticipate having any contacts with IOC  
in 2014. In addition, on September 4, 2013, the U.S. Treasury  
Department issued a license to BP authorizing BP and certain others  
to engage in various activities relating to the operation and production  
of the Rhum field. The Rhum field remains shut down, but it is  
anticipated that production could restart at some point in 2014.  
(d) (i) or (d) (ii) of Section 13(r) (1), affiliates of the Company may be  
deemed to have engaged in certain transactions or dealings with  
the government of Iran that would require disclosure pursuant to  
Section 13(r) (1) (d) (iii), as discussed below.  
92  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Risk factors  
Other risks  
4
The Group does not purchase Iranian hydrocarbons or own or  
operate any refineries or chemicals plants in Iran.  
purchased by TEL from international markets. TEL expects to stop  
pursuing this activity in 2014.  
Until December 2012, at which time it sold its entire interest, the  
Group held a 50% interest in the company Beh Total (now named  
Beh Tam) along with Behran Oil (50%), a company controlled by  
entities with ties to the government of Iran. As part of the sale of  
the Group’s interest in Beh Tam, TOTAL S.A. agreed to license the  
trademark “Total” to Beh Tam for an initial 3-year period for the sale  
by Beh Tam of lubricants to domestic consumers in Iran. Total E&P  
Iran (“TEPI”), a wholly-owned affiliate of TOTAL S.A., expects to receive,  
on behalf of TOTAL S.A., annual royalty payments in Rials from Beh  
Tam during the period 2014-2016 for such license. Each payment  
will be based on Beh Tam’s sales of lubricants during the previous  
calendar year. Representatives of the Group and Beh Tam met twice  
in 2013 to discuss the local lubricants market and further discussions  
are expected to take place in the future. TEPI received payments in  
Total Belgium NV (“Total Belgium”), a company held 99.99% by the  
Group and the rest by an individual, provided in early 2013 fuel payment  
cards to Iranian diplomatic missions in Belgium for use in the Group’s  
service stations. In 2013, these activities generated gross revenue  
of approximately 27,500 and net income of approximately 550.  
The Company terminated this contractual agreement in 2013. In  
addition, Total Belgium supplied approximately 11,000 liters of heating  
fuel (gasoil) to the Iranian Embassy in Brussels. In 2013, this activity  
generated gross revenue of approximately 9,500 and net income  
of approximately 1,500. Such supply arrangements ceased in  
December 2013 and there are no plans to resume such supply.  
Total Deutschland GmbH (“Total Deutschland”), a German company  
wholly-owned by the Group, provided in 2013 fuel payment cards  
to Iranian diplomatic missions in Germany for use in the Group’s  
service stations. In 2013, these activities generated gross revenue  
of approximately 4,400 and a net profit of approximately 50.  
Total Deutschland is in the process of terminating these arrangements.  
2013 from Beh Tam in Rials of approximately 2.6 million that  
corresponded to an outstanding 2011 Beh Total dividend payment  
and the settling of debts related to the Group’s prior ownership.  
Similar payments, in addition to the royalty payments described  
above, are expected to be received from Beh Tam in 2014.  
In addition, the Group holds a 50% interest in, but does not operate,  
Samsung Total Petrochemicals Co. Ltd (“STC”), a South Korean  
incorporated joint venture with Samsung General Chemicals Co.,  
Ltd. (50%). In reliance on the exemption provided in Section  
Total Marketing Middle East FZE (“TMME”), a wholly-owned affiliate  
of the Group, which had stopped sales of lubricants to Beh Total at  
the end of 2012, decided in 2013 to resume such sales to Beh Tam in Iran.  
The sale in 2013 of approximately 188 t of lubricants generated gross  
revenue of approximately 1.0 million and a net profit of approximately  
1
245 (d) (4) (d) of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)  
announced on December 7, 2012, STC purchased approximately  
50,000 t of condensates in early 2013 directly or indirectly from  
1
0.2 million. TMME expects to continue such activity in 2014.  
companies affiliated with the Iranian government for approximately  
94 million. As such condensates are used by STC as inputs for its  
manufacturing processes, it is not possible to estimate the revenues  
from sales or net income attributable to such purchases. STC  
stopped such purchases in March 2013.  
Total Oil Turkiye A.S. (“TOT A.S.”), a company wholly owned by  
the Group and three Group employees, sold in 2013 approximately  
81 t of additives to a private held Turkish company not affiliated with  
the Group, which subsequently sold such additives to Beh Tam for  
the manufacture of lubricants. This activity generated for TOT A.S.  
gross revenue of approximately 296,000 and a net profit of  
approximately 54,000. TOT A.S. does not expect to continue  
this activity in 2014.  
Syria  
Since early December 2011, TOTAL has ceased its activities that  
contribute to oil and gas production in Syria and maintains a local  
office solely for non-operational functions. In 2013, TOTAL made  
payments of approximately 0.5 million to Syrian government  
agencies in the form of taxes and contributions for services rendered  
by the Syrian public sector in relation to the maintenance of the  
aforementioned office and its personnel.  
Total Ethiopia Ltd (“TEL”), an Ethiopian company held 99.99% by  
the Group and the rest by three Group Employees, paid approximately  
63,000 in 2013 to Merific Iran Gas Co, an Ethiopian company  
majority-owned by entities affiliated with the government of Iran,  
pursuant to a contract for the transport and storage of LPG in Ethiopia  
3.10. Risks related to competition  
TOTAL’s competitors are comprised of national oil companies and  
international oil companies. The evolutions of the energy sector  
have opened the door to new competitors, increased market price  
volatility and called the viability of long-term contracts into question.  
The pursuit of unconventional gas development, particularly in the  
United States, has contributed to falling market prices and a  
marked difference between spot and long-term contract prices.  
The competitiveness of long-term contracts indexed to oil prices  
could be affected if this discrepancy persists and if it should prove  
difficult to invoke price revision clauses.  
TOTAL is subject to competition from other oil companies in the  
acquisition of assets and licenses for the exploration and production  
of oil and natural gas as well as for the sale of manufactured  
products based on crude and refined oil. In the gas sector, major  
producers are becoming interested in the downstream value chain  
and are competing directly with established distribution companies,  
including those that belong to the Group. Increased competitive  
pressure could have a significant negative effect on the sales  
prices, margins and market shares of the Group’s companies.  
The major international oil companies in competition with TOTAL  
are ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and BP. As of  
December 31, 2013, TOTAL ranked fifth among these companies  
(1)  
in terms of market capitalization .  
(1) Source: Reuters.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
93  
Risk factors  
4
Legal and arbitration proceedings  
4. Legal and arbitration proceedings  
There are no governmental, legal or arbitration proceedings, including any proceeding that the Company is aware of, threatened with or even  
pending (including the main legal proceedings described hereafter) that could have, or could have had during the last twelve months, a  
material impact on the Group’s financial situation or profitability.  
The main legal proceedings in which the Group’s companies are involved are described below.  
4.1. Antitrust investigations  
The principal antitrust proceedings in which the Group’s companies  
are involved are described below.  
regarding a product line of the Marketing & Services segment,  
which the Company had already paid, and concerning which  
TOTAL S.A. was declared jointly liable as the parent company,  
the relevant European court decided during the third quarter of  
4.1.1. Refining & Chemicals segment  
2013 to reduce the fine imposed on Total Marketing Services to  
As part of the spin-off of Arkema(1) in 2006, TOTAL S.A. and certain  
other Group companies granted to Arkema for a period of ten years  
a guarantee for potential monetary consequences related to antitrust  
proceedings arising from events prior to the spin-off. As of  
125.5 million without modifying the liability of TOTAL S.A. as  
parent company. Appeals have been lodged against this  
judgment.  
December 31, 2013, all public and civil proceedings covered by the  
guarantee were definitively resolved in Europe and in the United  
States. Despite the fact that Arkema has implemented since 2001  
compliance procedures that are designed to prevent its employees  
from violating antitrust provisions, it is not possible to exclude the  
possibility that the relevant authorities could commence additional  
proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior to the spin-off.  
– In the United Kingdom, a settlement took place in the third  
quarter of 2013 putting an end to the civil proceeding initiated  
against TOTAL S.A., Total Marketing Services and other companies,  
by third parties alleging damages in connection with practices  
already sanctioned by the European Commission. A similar civil  
proceeding is pending in the Netherlands. At this stage, the  
plaintiffs have not communicated the amount of their claim.  
Finally, in Italy, in 2013, a civil proceeding was initiated against  
TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiary Total Aviazione Italia Srl before the  
competent Italian civil court. The plaintiff claims against  
TOTAL S.A., its subsidiary and other third parties, damages that  
it estimates to be nearly 908 million. This procedure follows  
practices that had been sanctioned by the Italian competition  
authority in 2006. The existence and the assessment of the  
alleged damages in this procedure involving multiple defendants  
are strongly contested.  
4
.1.2. Marketing & Services segment  
The administrative procedure opened by the European  
Commission against TOTAL Nederland N.V and TOTAL S.A., as  
parent company, in relation to practices regarding a product line  
of the Marketing & Services segment, resulted in a condemnation  
in 2006 that became definitive in 2012. The resulting fine  
(20.25 million) and interest thereon were paid during the first  
quarter of 2013.  
Following the appeal lodged by the Group’s companies against  
the European Commission’s 2008 decision fining Total Marketing  
Services an amount of 128.2 million, in relation to practices  
Whatever the evolution of the proceedings described above, the  
Group believes that their outcome should not have a material adverse  
effect on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.  
4.2. Grande Paroisse  
An explosion occurred at the Grande Paroisse industrial site in the  
city of Toulouse in France on September 21, 2001. Grande  
Paroisse, a former subsidiary of Atofina which became a subsidiary  
of Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants on December 31, 2004, as part of the  
reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged  
in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion,  
which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed a  
portion of the site and caused the death of thirty-one people,  
including twenty-one workers at the site, and injured many others.  
The explosion also caused significant damage to certain property in  
part of the city of Toulouse.  
On December 14, 2006, Grande Paroisse signed, under the  
supervision of the city of Toulouse, a deed whereby it donated the  
former site of the AZF plant to the greater agglomeration of  
Toulouse (CAGT) and the Caisse des dépôts et consignations and  
its subsidiary ICADE. Under this deed, TOTAL S.A. guaranteed the  
site remediation obligations of Grande Paroisse and granted a  
10 million endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation  
as part of the setting up of a cancer research center at the site by  
the city of Toulouse.  
After having articulated several hypotheses, the Court-appointed  
experts did not maintain in their final report filed on May 11, 2006,  
that the accident was caused by pouring a large quantity of a  
chlorine compound over ammonium nitrate. Instead, the experts  
This plant has been closed and individual assistance packages  
have been provided for employees. The site has been rehabilitated.  
(
1) Arkema is used in this section to designate those companies of the Arkema group whose ultimate parent company is Arkema S.A. Arkema became an independent company after  
being spun-off from TOTAL S.A. in May 2006.  
94  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Risk factors  
Legal and arbitration proceedings  
4
have retained a scenario where a container of chlorine compound  
sweepings was poured between a layer of wet ammonium nitrate  
covering the floor and a quantity of dry agricultural nitrate at a  
location not far from the principal storage site. This is claimed to  
have caused an explosion which then spread into the main storage  
site. Grande Paroisse was investigated based on this new hypothesis  
in 2006; Grande Paroisse is contesting this explanation, which it  
believes to be based on elements that are not factually accurate.  
The Prosecutor’s office, together with certain third parties, appealed  
the Toulouse Criminal Court verdict. In order to preserve its rights,  
Grande Paroisse lodged a cross-appeal with respect to civil charges.  
By its decision of September 24, 2012, the Court of Appeal of  
Toulouse (Cour d’appel de Toulouse) upheld the lower court verdict  
pursuant to which the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and  
Mr. Thierry Desmarest were determined to be inadmissible. This  
element of the decision has been appealed by certain third parties  
before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).  
On July 9, 2007, the investigating magistrate brought charges  
against Grande Paroisse and the former Plant Manager before the  
Toulouse Criminal Court. In late 2008, TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry  
Desmarest, Chairman and CEO at the time of the event, were  
summoned to appear in Court pursuant to a request by a victims  
association.  
The Court of Appeal considered, however, that the explosion was  
the result of the chemical accident described by the court-  
appointed experts. Accordingly, it convicted the former Plant  
Manager and Grande Paroisse. This element of the decision has  
been appealed by the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse  
before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), which has  
the effect of suspending their criminal sentences.  
On November 19, 2009, the Toulouse Criminal Court acquitted  
both the former Plant Manager, and Grande Paroisse due to the  
lack of reliable evidence for the explosion. The Court also ruled that  
the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest  
were inadmissible.  
A compensation mechanism for victims was set up immediately  
following the explosion. 2.3 billion was paid for the compensation  
of claims and related expenses amounts. A 12.7 million reserve  
remains booked in the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements  
as of December 31, 2013.  
Due to the presumption of civil liability that applied to Grande  
Paroisse, the Court declared Grande Paroisse civilly liable for the  
damages caused by the explosion to the victims in its capacity as  
custodian and operator of the plant.  
4.3. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee – Russian regions and Interneft  
Blue Rapid, a Panamanian company, and the Russian Olympic  
Committee filed a claim for damages with the Paris Commercial  
Court against Elf Aquitaine, alleging a so-called non-completion by  
a former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine of a contract related to an  
exploration and production project in Russia negotiated in the early  
In connection with the same facts, and fifteen years after the  
termination of the exploration and production contract, a Russian  
company, which was held not to be the contracting party to the  
contract, and two regions of the Russian Federation that were not  
even parties to the contract, launched an arbitration procedure  
against the aforementioned former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine that  
was liquidated in 2005, claiming alleged damages of U.S.$22.4  
billion. For the same reasons as those successfully adjudicated by  
Elf Aquitaine against Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic  
Committee, the Group considers this claim to be unfounded as a  
matter of law and fact. The Group has lodged a criminal complaint to  
denounce the fraudulent claim of which the Group believes it is a  
victim, and has taken and reserved its rights to take other actions  
and measures to defend its interests.  
1990s. Elf Aquitaine believed this claim to be unfounded and  
opposed it. On January 12, 2009, the Commercial Court of Paris  
rejected Blue Rapid’s claim against Elf Aquitaine and found that the  
Russian Olympic Committee did not have standing in the matter.  
Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this  
decision. On June 30, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Paris dismissed  
as inadmissible the claim of Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic  
Committee against Elf Aquitaine, notably on the grounds of the  
contract having lapsed. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic  
Committee appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court.  
4.4. Iran  
In 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)  
followed by the Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a formal order  
directing an investigation in connection with the pursuit of business  
in Iran by certain oil companies including, among others, TOTAL.  
The inquiry concerned an agreement concluded by the Company  
with consultants concerning gas fields in Iran and aimed at verifying  
whether certain payments made under this agreement would have  
benefited Iranian officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt  
with the SEC). These settlements, which put an end to these  
investigations, were concluded without admission of guilt and in  
exchange for TOTAL respecting a number of obligations, including  
the payment of a fine ($245.2 million) and civil compensation  
($153 million) that occurred during the second quarter of 2013.  
The reserve of $398.2 million that was booked in the financial  
statements as of June 30, 2012, has been fully released. By virtue  
of these settlements, TOTAL also accepted to appoint a French  
independent compliance monitor to review the Group’s compliance  
program and to recommend possible improvements.  
Practices Act (FCPA) and the Company’s accounting obligations.  
In late May 2013, and after several years of discussions,  
TOTAL reached settlements with the U.S. authorities (a Deferred  
Prosecution Agreement with the DoJ and a Cease and Desist Order  
With respect to the same facts, TOTAL and its Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer, who was President of the Middle East at the time  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
95  
 
Risk factors  
4
Legal and arbitration proceedings  
of the facts, were placed under formal investigation in France  
following a judicial inquiry initiated in 2006. In late May 2013,  
the Prosecutor’s office recommended that the case be sent to trial.  
The investigating magistrate has not yet issued his decision.  
At this point, the Company considers that the resolution of these  
cases is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s  
financial situation or consequences for its future planned operations.  
4.5. Libya  
In June 2011, the United States Securities and Exchange  
Commission (SEC) issued to certain oil companies – including,  
among others, TOTAL – a formal request for information related to  
their operations in Libya. In April 2013, the SEC notified TOTAL of  
the closure of the investigation while stating that it does not intend  
to take further action as far as TOTAL is concerned.  
4.6. Oil-for-Food Program  
Several countries have launched investigations concerning possible  
violations related to the United Nations (UN) Oil-for-Food Program in Iraq.  
complicity and influence peddling. The indictment was brought  
eight years after the beginning of the investigation without any new  
evidence being introduced.  
Pursuant to a French criminal investigation, certain current or former  
Group Employees were placed under formal criminal investigation  
for possible charges as accessories to the misappropriation of  
Corporate assets and as accessories to the corruption of foreign  
public agents. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the  
Company, formerly President of the Group’s Exploration & Production  
division, was also placed under formal investigation in October 2006.  
In 2007, the criminal investigation was closed and the case was  
transferred to the Prosecutor’s office. In 2009, the Prosecutor’s  
office recommended to the investigating magistrate that the case  
against the Group’s current and former employees and TOTAL’s  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer not be pursued.  
In October 2010, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the  
investigating magistrate that the case against TOTAL S.A., the Group’s  
former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
not be pursued. However, by ordinance notified in early August 2011,  
the investigating magistrate on the matter decided to send the case  
to trial. On July 8, 2013, TOTAL S.A., the Group’s former employees  
and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were cleared  
of all charges by the Criminal Court, which found that none of the  
offenses for which they had been prosecuted were established. On  
July 18, 2013, the Prosecutor’s office appealed the parts of the Criminal  
Court’s decision acquitting TOTAL S.A. and certain of the Group’s  
former employees. TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s  
acquittal issued on July 8, 2013 is irrevocable since the Prosecutor’s  
office did not appeal this part of the Criminal Court’s decision.  
In early 2010, despite the recommendation of the Prosecutor’s  
office, a new investigating magistrate, having taken over the case,  
decided to indict TOTAL S.A. on bribery charges as well as  
4.7. Italy  
As part of an investigation led by the Prosecutor of the Republic of  
the Potenza Court, Total Italia and certain Group Employees were  
the subject of an investigation related to certain calls for tenders  
that Total Italia made for the preparation and development of an oil  
field. On February 16, 2009, as a preliminary measure before the  
proceedings went before the Court, the preliminary investigation  
judge of Potenza served notice to Total Italia of a decision that would  
have suspended the concession for this field for one year. Total Italia  
appealed the decision by the preliminary investigation judge before  
the Court of Appeal of Potenza. In a decision dated April 8, 2009,  
the Court reversed the suspension of the concession and appointed  
for one year, i.e., until February 16, 2010, a judicial administrator to  
supervise the operations related to the development of the  
concession, allowing the Tempa Rossa project to continue.  
The criminal investigation was closed in the first half of 2010.  
In May 2012, the Judge of the preliminary hearing decided to  
dismiss the charges against some of the Group’s employees and  
to refer the case for trial on a reduced number of charges. The trial  
started on September 26, 2012.  
4.8. Rivunion  
On July 9, 2012, the Swiss Tribunal Fédéral (Switzerland’s Supreme  
Court) rendered a decision against Rivunion, a wholly-owned  
subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, confirming a tax reassessment in the  
amount of CHF 171 million (excluding interest for late payment).  
According to the Tribunal, Rivunion was held liable as tax collector  
of withholding taxes owed by the beneficiaries of taxable services.  
Rivunion, in liquidation since March 13, 2002 and unable to recover  
the amounts corresponding to the withholding taxes in order to  
meet its fiscal obligations, has been subject to insolvency  
proceedings since November 1, 2012. On August 29, 2013,  
the Swiss federal tax administration lodged a claim as part of the  
insolvency proceedings of Rivunion, for an amount of CHF  
284 million, including CHF 171 million of principal as well as interest  
for late payment.  
96  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Risk factors  
Insurance and risk management  
4
4.9. Total Gabon  
On February 14, 2014, Total Gabon received a tax re-assessment  
notice from the Ministère de l’Économie et de la Prospective of the  
Gabonese Republic accompanied by a partial tax collection notice,  
following the tax audit of Total Gabon in relation to the years 2008  
to 2010. The amount referred to in the above tax re-assessment  
notice is 805 million US dollars.  
The partial tax collection procedure was suspended on March 5, 2014.  
Total Gabon disputes the grounds for the re-assessment  
and the associated amounts. Total Gabon intends to take all  
actions necessary to assert its rights and protect its interests.  
4.10 Kashagan  
In Kazakhstan, the Atyrau Region Environmental Department  
“ARED”) launched against the consortium developing the Kashagan  
field, in which TOTAL holds an interest of 16.81%, a procedure  
alleging non-compliance with environmental legislation related to  
gas emissions (flaring). ARED issued a claim on March 7, 2014, for  
an amount of approximately US dollars 737 million (KZT 134 billion),  
of which TOTAL’s share would be approximately US dollars  
124 million (KZT 22.5 billion). The Kashagan project’s consortium  
disputes these allegations.  
(
5. Insurance and risk management  
5.1. Organization  
TOTAL has its own reinsurance company, Omnium Reinsurance  
Company (ORC).ORC is integrated within the Group’s insurance  
management and is used as a centralized global operations tool  
for covering the Group companies’ insurable risks. It allows the  
Group’s worldwide insurance program to be implemented in  
compliance with the specific requirements of local regulations  
applicable in the countries where the Group operates.  
At the same time, ORC negotiates a reinsurance program at the  
Group level with oil industry mutual insurance companies and  
commercial reinsurance markets. ORC allows the Group to better  
manage price variations in the insurance market by taking on a  
greater or lesser amount of risk corresponding to the price trends  
in the insurance market.  
In 2013, the net amount of risk retained by ORC after reinsurance  
was a maximum of $54 million per onshore third-party liability  
insurance claim, $87 million per offshore third-party liability  
insurance claim and $75 million per property damage and/or  
business interruption insurance claim. Accordingly, in the event  
of any loss giving rise to an aggregate insurance claim, the effect  
on ORC would be limited to its maximum retention of $162 million  
per occurrence.  
Some countries may require the purchase of insurance from a local  
insurance company. If the local insurer accepts to cover the  
subsidiary of the Group in compliance with its worldwide insurance  
program, ORC negotiates a retrocession of the covered risks from  
the local insurer. As a result, ORC enters into reinsurance contracts  
with the subsidiaries’ local insurance companies, which transfer  
most of the risk to ORC.  
5.2. Risk and insurance management policy  
In this context, the Group risk and insurance management policy is  
to work with the relevant internal department of each subsidiary to:  
– help to implement measures to limit the probability that a catastrophic  
event occurs and the financial consequences if such event  
should occur; and  
define scenarios of major disaster risks (estimated maximum loss);  
manage the level of risk from such events to be either covered  
internally by the Group or transferred to the insurance market.  
assess the potential financial impact on the Group should a  
catastrophic event occur;  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
97  
 
Risk factors  
4
Insurance and risk management  
5.3. Insurance policy  
The Group has worldwide property insurance and third-party liability  
coverage for all its subsidiaries. These programs are contracted  
with first-class insurers (or reinsurers and oil and gas industry  
mutual insurance companies through ORC).  
Other insurance contracts are bought by the Group in addition to  
property damage and third-party liability coverage, mainly for car  
fleets, credit insurance and employee benefits. These risks are  
mostly underwritten by outside insurance companies.  
The amounts insured depend on the financial risks defined in the  
disaster scenarios and the coverage terms offered by the market  
The above-described policy is given as an example of a situation  
as of a given date and cannot be considered as representative  
of future conditions. The Group’s insurance policy may be changed  
at any time depending on the market conditions, specific  
circumstances and on the General Management’s assessment  
of the risks incurred and the adequacy of their coverage.  
(available capacities and price conditions).  
More specifically for:  
Third-party liability insurance: since the maximum financial risk  
cannot be evaluated by a systematic approach, the amounts  
insured are based on market conditions and oil and gas industry  
practice. In 2013, the Group’s third-party liability insurance for  
any liability (including potential accidental environmental liabilities)  
was capped at $850 million (onshore) and $750 million (offshore).  
TOTAL believes that its insurance coverage is in line with industry  
practice and sufficient to cover normal risks in its operations.  
However, the Group is not insured against all potential risks.  
In the event of a major environmental disaster, for example,  
TOTAL’s liability may exceed the maximum coverage provided  
by its third-party liability insurance. The loss TOTAL could suffer  
in the event of such disaster would depend on all the facts and  
circumstances of the event and would be subject to a whole range  
of uncertainties, including legal uncertainty as to the scope of liability  
for consequential damages, which may include economic damage  
not directly connected to the disaster. The Group cannot guarantee  
that it will not suffer any uninsured loss and there can be no  
guarantee, particularly in the case of a major environmental disaster  
or industrial accident, that such loss would not have a material  
adverse effect on the Group.  
Property damage and business interruption: the amounts insured  
vary by sector and by site and are based on the estimated cost  
of and scenarios of reconstruction under maximum loss  
scenarios and on insurance market conditions. The Group  
subscribed for business interruption coverage in 2013 for its  
main refining and petrochemical sites.  
For example, for the Group’s highest risks (North Sea platforms  
and main refineries and petrochemical plants), in 2013 the  
insurance limit for the Group share of the installations was  
approximately $1.7 billion for the Refining & Chemicals segment  
and approximately $1.6 billion for the Upstream segment.  
Deductibles for property damage and third-party liability fluctuate  
between 0.1 and 10 million depending on the level of risk and  
liability, and are borne by the relevant subsidiaries. For business  
interruption, coverage is triggered sixty days after the occurrence  
giving rise to the interruption. In addition, the main refineries and  
petrochemical plants bear a combined retention for property damage  
and business interruption of $50 million per insurance claim.  
98  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
5.Gouvernement d’entreprise  
Corporate governance  
5
Corporate governance  
1.  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code)  
(
100  
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
.1.  
.2.  
.3.  
.4.  
.5.  
.6.  
.7.  
.8.  
.9.  
Composition of the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100  
Other information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108  
Corporate Governance Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108  
Rules of procedure of the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .109  
Committees of the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113  
Activity of the Board of Directors and its Committees in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .119  
Board of Directors practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123  
Director independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .124  
Additional information on the members of the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125  
.10. Internal control and risk management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .125  
.11. Particular conditions regarding participation in Shareholders’ Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129  
.12. Information mentioned in Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .129  
.13. Principles and rules applied to determine the compensation and other benefits of the executive directors . . . . . . . . . . . .130  
2.  
Statutory auditor’s report  
article L. 225-235 of the French Commercial Code)  
(
131  
132  
3.  
General Management  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
Management Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .132  
The Executive Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .132  
The Management Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .132  
4.  
Statutory auditors  
133  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
4.4.  
Statutory auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133  
Alternate auditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133  
Auditor’s term of office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133  
Fees received by the statutory auditors (including members of their network) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134  
5.  
Share ownership  
134  
5
5
.1.  
.2.  
Arrangements for involving employees in the Company’s share capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .134  
Shares held by the administration and management bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
99  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
1
. Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
(
Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code)  
Pursuant to Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code,  
the following report presents information for the year 2013 related  
to the composition of the Board of Directors, the application of the  
men/women balanced representation principle to the Board  
of Directors, the preparation and organization of the work of the  
Board of Directors, internal control and risk management  
procedures implemented by the Company, any limits set by the  
Board of Directors concerning the powers of the Chief Executive  
Officer, as well as information related to corporate governance.  
This report also sets forth the provisions of the bylaws concerning  
participation in Shareholders’ Meetings and presents the principles  
and rules applied to determine the compensation and other  
benefits granted to the executive and non-executive directors  
(mandataires sociaux). It also includes the publication of information  
required by Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code.  
This report was prepared based on input from several of the  
Company’s functional divisions, including in particular the Legal,  
Finance and Group Internal Control and Audit Departments.  
This report was approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting  
on February 11, 2014, after the Board’s committees reviewed the  
sections relevant to their respective duties.  
1.1. Composition of the Board of Directors  
Directors are appointed by the shareholders for a 3-year term  
Article 11 of the Company’s bylaws).  
of the Board are staggered to more evenly space the renewal  
of appointments and to ensure the continuity of the work of the  
Board of Directors and its Committees.  
(
In case of the resignation or death of a director between two  
Shareholders’ Meetings, the Board may temporarily appoint a  
replacement director. This appointment must be ratified by  
the next Shareholders’ Meeting. The terms of office of the members  
The Board of Directors appoints the Chairman of the Board from  
among its members. The Board of Directors also appoints the Chief  
Executive Officer, who may or may not be a member of the Board.  
1.1.1. Composition of the Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013  
As of December 31, 2013, the Board of Directors had fifteen  
members, including one director appointed by the shareholders  
to represent employee shareholders. Twelve of the members  
of the Board were independent (see point 1.8. below).  
Chairman of the Strategic Committee.  
Holds 121,556 TOTAL shares and 65,242 shares of the “TOTAL  
ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund.  
Current directorships  
The following individuals were members of the Board of Directors  
of TOTAL S.A. (information as of December 31, 2013(1)):  
– Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A.* since  
May 21, 2010 (Chief Executive Officer since February 14, 2007)  
– Director of Shtokman Development AG (Switzerland)  
Christophe de Margerie  
Director of BNP Paribas* since May 15, 2013  
Manager of CDM Patrimonial SARL  
Born on August 6, 1951 (French).  
Mr. de Margerie joined the Group after graduating from the  
École Supérieure de Commerce in Paris in 1974. He served  
in several positions in the Group’s Finance Department and  
Exploration & Production division. In 1995, he was appointed  
President of Total Middle East. In May 1999, he joined the  
Executive Committee as President of the Exploration & Production  
division. He then became Senior Executive Vice President of  
Exploration & Production of the new TotalFinaElf group in 2000. In  
January 2002, he became President of the Exploration & Production  
division of TOTAL. He was appointed a member of the Board of  
Directors by the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 12, 2006  
and became Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL on February 14,  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
– Member of the Supervisory Board of Vivendi* until April 30, 2013  
– Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Elf Aquitaine until  
June 21, 2010  
– Chairman of Total E&P Indonésie until December 20, 2013  
Thierry Desmarest  
Born on December 18, 1945 (French).  
A graduate of the École Polytechnique and an Engineer of the  
French Corps des Mines, Mr. Desmarest served as Director of  
Mines and Geology in New Caledonia, then as technical advisor at  
the Offices of the Minister of Industry and the Minister of Economy.  
He joined TOTAL in 1981, where he held various management  
positions, then served as President of Exploration & Production until  
2007. On May 21, 2010, he was named Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of TOTAL. Mr. de Margerie is also a Director  
of the Institut du monde arabe.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2006. Last renewal: May 11, 2012  
until 2015.  
1995. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TOTAL  
from May 1995 until February 2007, and then as Chairman of the  
(
*
1) Including information pursuant to paragraph 4 of Article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code or under item 14.1 of Annex I of EC Regulation No. 809/2004 of April 29, 2004.  
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
100  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Board of TOTAL until May 21, 2010. He was appointed Honorary  
Chairman and remains a director of TOTAL and Chairman of the  
TOTAL Foundation.  
Patricia Barbizet  
Born on April 17, 1955 (French).  
Independent director.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 1995. Last renewal: May 17, 2013  
until 2016.  
A graduate of the École Supérieure de Commerce of Paris in 1976,  
Ms. Barbizet started her career in the Renault Group as the Treasurer  
of Renault Véhicules Industriels and then Chief Financial Officer of  
Renault Crédit International. She joined the Pinault group in 1989  
as the Chief Financial Officer. In 1992, she became Chief Executive  
Officer of Artémis, then in 2004 Chief Executive Officer of Financière  
Pinault. She was the President of the Supervisory Board of the  
Pinault Printemps Redoute group until May 2005 and became  
Vice-President of the Board of Directors of PPR (now Kering)  
in May 2005. Patricia Barbizet is also a member of the Board  
of Directors of TOTAL and Peugeot S.A.  
Chairman of the Governance & Ethics Committee, member of the  
Compensation Committee and the Strategic Committee.  
Holds 186,576 shares.  
Current directorships  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of Sanofi*(1)  
Director of L’Air Liquide*  
Director of Renault S.A.*  
Director of Renault S.A.S.  
Director of Bombardier Inc.* (Canada)  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2008. Last renewal: May 13, 2011  
until 2014.  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Chairperson of the Audit Committee and member of the Strategic  
Committee.  
Chairman of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.* until May 21,  
010  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Areva* until March 4, 2010  
2
Holds 1,000 shares.  
Current directorships  
The Honorary Chairman performs representation missions of the  
Group at a high level in accordance with the decision of the Board  
of Directors on May 21, 2010.  
– Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
– Director of Peugeot S.A.* since April 24, 2013  
Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Kering S.A.*  
Patrick Artus  
– Director and Chief Executive Officer of Artémis (S.A.)  
Chief Executive Officer (non-Director) of Financière Pinault (S.C.A.)  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Financière Pinault (S.C.A.)  
Born on October 14, 1951 (French).  
Independent director.  
– Director of Groupe Fnac * (S.A.) since April 17, 2013  
Director of Société Nouvelle du Théâtre Marigny (S.A)  
Permanent representative of Artémis, member of the Board  
of Directors of Agefi (S.A.)  
Permanent representative of Artémis, member of the Board  
of Directors of Sebdo le Point (S.A.)  
Member of the Management Board of Société Civile du Vignoble  
de Château Latour (société civile)  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Yves Saint Laurent (S.A.S.)  
Administratore Delagato & administratore of Palazzo Grazzi (Italy)  
Chairman of the Board of Directors & Board member of Christie’s  
International Plc (England)  
A graduate of the École Polytechnique, the École Nationale de la  
Statistique et de l’Administration Économique (ENSAE) and the  
Institut d’études politiques de Paris, Mr. Artus began his career  
at the INSEE (French National Institute for Statistics and Economic  
Studies) where his work included economic forecasting and modeling.  
He then worked at the Economics Department of the OECD (1980),  
later becoming the Head of Research at the ENSAE from 1982 to  
1985. He was scientific adviser at the research department of the  
Banque de France, before joining the Natixis Group as the head of  
the research department, and has been a member of its Executive  
Committee since May 2013. He is an associate professor at the  
University of Paris I, Sorbonne. He is also a member of the council  
of economic advisors to the French Prime Minister and of the  
Cercle des Économistes.  
Non-Executive Director of Kering Holland, formerly Gucci  
(Netherlands), since April 9, 2013  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2009. Last renewal: May 11, 2012  
until 2015.  
– Director of Air France-KLM* until December 31, 2013  
– Director of Fonds Stratégique d’Investissement (S.A.)  
until July 12, 2013  
Member of the Compensation Committee and the  
Governance & Ethics Committee.  
Director of Bouygues* until April 25, 2013  
Director of TF1* (S.A.) until April 18, 2013  
Holds 1,000 shares.  
– Board member of Gucci until April 9, 2013  
Non-Executive Director of Tawa Plc* until June 2012  
Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Société Nouvelle du Théâtre  
Marigny until January 2012  
Current directorships  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of IPSOS*  
– Director of Fnac until May 2011  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
None.  
(
*
1) Non-consolidated company which was removed from the scope of consolidation on July 1, 2010.  
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
101  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
Gunnar Brock  
Current directorships  
Born on April 12, 1950 (Swedish).  
– Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar S.A.  
Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of Colam Entreprendre  
Independent director.  
A graduate of the Stockholm School of Economics with an MBA  
in Economics and Business Administration, Mr. Brock held various  
international positions at Tetra Pak. He served as Chief Executive  
Officer of Alfa Laval from 1992 to 1994 and as Chief Executive  
Officer of Tetra Pak from 1994 to 2000. After serving as Chief  
Executive Officer of Thule International, he was appointed Chief  
Executive Officer of Atlas Copco AB from 2002 to 2009. He is  
currently Chairman of the Board of Stora Enso Oy. Mr. Brock is also  
a member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences  
and of the Board of Directors of the Stockholm School of Economics.  
– Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre, member  
of the Board of Directors at Cabus & Raulot (S.A.S)  
– Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre, co-manager  
of Sonedis (société civile)  
– Permanent representative of Colam Entreprendre, Director  
of Sovemarco Europe (S.A.)  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of Sonepar France  
– Co-manager of Développement Mobilier & Industriel (D.M.I.)  
(société civile)  
– Manager of Ker Coro (société civile immobilière)  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2010. Last renewal: May 17, 2013  
until 2016.  
Directorship that expired in the previous five years  
Director of Hagemeyer Canada, Inc. until 2013  
Member of the Compensation Committee, the Governance & Ethics  
Committee and the Strategic Committee.  
– President of the Supervisory Board of OTRA N.V. until 2013  
– Director of Sonepar Canada, Inc. until 2013  
President of the Supervisory Board of Sonepar Deutschland  
GmbH until 2013  
Holds 1,000 shares.  
Current directorships  
– Director of Sonepar Iberica until 2013  
Director of Sonepar Italia Holding until 2013  
Director of Sonepar Mexico until 2013  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Sonepar Nederland B.V.  
until 2013  
Director of Sonepar USA Holdings, Inc. until 2013  
Director of Feljas and Masson SAS until 2013  
Chief Executive Officer of Sonepar S.A. until 2012  
Permanent representative of Sonepar S.A., co-manager  
of Sonedis (société civile) until 2012  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Chairman of the Board of Stora Enso Oy*  
Member of the Board of Investor AB*  
Member of the Board of Syngenta AG*  
Chairman of the Board of Mölnlycke Health Care Group  
Chairman of the Board of Rolling Optics  
Member of the Board of Stena AB  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Permanent representative of Sonepar, President of Sonepar  
International (S.A.S) until 2012  
Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar Mexico until 2012  
Director of Encon Safety Products, Inc. until 2010  
Director of Hagemeyer North America, Inc. until 2010  
Director of Hagemeyer PPS Ltd until 2010  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Spencer Stuart Scandinavia  
until 2011  
Chief Executive Officer of Atlas Copco until 2009  
Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette  
Born on November 4, 1956 (French).  
Independent director.  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar Mexico until 2010  
Director of Vallen Corporation until 2010  
Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of A.E.D. until 2010  
A graduate of the University of Paris X Nanterre (law and English)  
and holder of a Specialized Law Certificate from the New York Bar  
Association, Ms. Coisne-Roquette worked as an attorney until  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of C.S.O. until 2010  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of Collin Sigmadis  
until 2010  
1
1
988, when she joined the family-owned Sonepar group. From  
988 to 1998, while also serving as Chief Executive Officer of the  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of G.M.T. until 2010  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of S.N.E. until 2010  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of S.S.E. until 2010  
– Permanent representative of Sonepar, Director of Teissier until 2010  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar Canada, Inc.  
until 2009  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar France until 2009  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors and acting Managing  
Director of Sonepar Iberica until 2009  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar Italia Holding  
until 2009  
– Chairperson of the Board of Directors of Sonepar Nordic A/S  
until 2009  
family-owned Colam Entreprendre holding company, she held  
several consecutive directorships at Sonepar S.A., where she was  
appointed Chairman of the Board in 1998. She was Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer of Sonepar from 2002 to 2012, and has  
been Chairman of the Board of Directors since January 1, 2013.  
A member of the Executive Board of MEDEF from 2000 to 2013,  
where she chaired that organization’s Tax Commission from 2005  
to 2013, Ms. Coisne-Roquette is a member of the Economic,  
Social and Environmental Council. She is also a director of the  
Association nationale des sociétés par actions (ANSA).  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 13, 2011 and until 2014.  
Member of the Audit Committee.  
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board of Sonepar Nederland B.V.  
until 2009  
Chairperson of the Board of Directors and CEO of Sonepar  
USA Holdings, Inc. until 2009  
Permanent representative of Sonepar, General Partner of  
Sonepar Belgium until 2009  
Holds 1,260 shares.  
*
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
102  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Bertrand Collomb  
Born on August 14, 1942 (French).  
Independent director.  
– Vice Chairman, Director and member of the Permanent  
Committee of Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA* (Belgium)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Groupe  
Investors Inc. (Canada)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Groupe  
d’assurance London Inc. (Canada)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of London Life,  
compagnie d’assurance-vie (Canada)  
A graduate of the École Polytechnique and a member of France’s  
engineering Corps des Mines, Mr. Collomb held a number of positions  
within the Ministry of Industry and other cabinet positions from  
1966 to 1975. He joined the Lafarge group in 1975, where he served  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Mackenzie Inc.  
Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board of La Presse,  
ltée (Canada)  
in various management positions. He served as Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of Lafarge from 1989 to 2003, then as Chairman  
of the Lafarge Board of Directors from 2003 to 2007, and has been  
the Honorary Chairman since 2007. He is also Chairman of the  
Institut des Hautes Études pour la Science et la Technologie (IHEST).  
Director and Deputy Chairman of Gesca ltée (Canada)  
Director of Lafarge* (S.A.) (France)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Compagnie  
d’Assurance du Canada sur la Vie (Canada)  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000. Last renewal: May 11, 2012  
until 2015.  
– Director and member of the Executive Committee of the  
Corporation Financière Canada-Vie (Canada)  
Member of the Governance & Ethics Committee.  
Holds 4,932 shares.  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of IGM Inc.*  
(Canada)  
Director and Chairman of the Board of 171263 Canada Inc.  
Current directorships  
(Canada)  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of DuPont* (United States of America)  
Director of Atco* (Canada)  
– Director of 152245 Canada Inc. (Canada)  
– Director of GWL&A Financial Inc. (United States of America)  
– Director of Great-West Financial (Nova Scotia) Co. (Canada)  
Director of Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company  
of New York (United States of America)  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Director of Lafarge* until 2012  
Chairman of the Institut Français des Relations Internationales  
– Director of Power Communications Inc. (Canada)  
– Director and Vice Chairman of the Board of Power Corporation  
International (Canada)  
(IFRI) until 2011  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Putnam  
Investments LLC (United States of America)  
Paul Desmarais, jr  
Born on July 3, 1954 (Canadian).  
Independent director.  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Power Financial Europe B.V.  
(Netherlands)  
– Director of Canada Life Capital Corporation Inc. (Canada)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of The Canada  
Life Insurance Company of Canada (Canada)  
Director and Deputy Chairman of the Board of Groupe de  
Communications Square Victoria Inc. (Canada)  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Parjointco N.V. (Netherlands)  
Director of SGS SA* (Switzerland)  
A graduate of McGill University in Montreal and of the Institut  
européen d’administration des affaires (INSEAD) in Fontainebleau,  
Mr. Desmarais was elected Vice Chairman (1984) and then Chairman  
of the Board (1990) of Corporation Financière Power, a company he  
helped found. Since 1996, he has served as Chairman of the Board  
and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Power Corporation of Canada.  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2002. Last renewal: May 13, 2011  
until 2014.  
– Director of GDF Suez* (France) until 2013  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Crown  
Life Insurance Company (Canada) until 2012  
Holds 2,000 ADRs (corresponding to 2,000 shares).  
Current directorships  
– Assistant Chairman of the Board of 3819787 Canada Inc.  
Canada) until 2010  
Director of Canada Life Insurance Company of America  
United States of America) until 2009  
(
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Chairman of the Board – Co-Chief Executive Officer of Power  
Corporation of Canada*  
(
Co-Chairman of the Board of Corporation Financière Power*  
Anne-Marie Idrac  
Born on July 27, 1951 (French).  
Independent director.  
(
Canada)  
Vice Chairman and Acting Managing Director of Pargesa Holding SA*  
Switzerland)  
(
Director and member of the Executive Committee of La Great-West,  
compagnie d’assurance-vie (Canada)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Great-West  
Life & Annuity Insurance Company (United States of America)  
Director and member of the Executive Committee of Great-West  
Lifeco Inc.* (Canada)  
A graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and formerly  
a student at the École Nationale d’Administration (ENA – 1974),  
Ms. Idrac began her career holding various positions as a senior  
civil servant at the Ministry of Infrastructure (Ministère de l’Équipement)  
in the fields of environment, housing, urban planning and transportation.  
She served as Executive Director of the public development authority  
Director of Great-West Financial (Canada) Inc. (Canada)  
*
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
103  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
of Cergy-Pontoise from 1990 to 1993 and Director of land transport  
from 1993 to 1995. Ms. Idrac was State Secretary for Transport  
from May 1995 to June 1997, elected member of Parliament for Yvelines  
from 1997 to 2002, regional councilor for Ile-de-France from 1998  
to 2002, and State Secretary for Foreign Trade from March 2008 to  
November 2010. She also served as Chairperson and Chief  
Executive Officer of RATP from 2002 to 2006 and then as  
Chairperson of SNCF from 2006 to 2008.  
of emerging markets at ABB and then at Nestlé between 1989  
and 1999, she was appointed Executive Director of Ford in Europe  
from 1999 to 2003. In 2003, Ms. Kux became a member of the  
Management Committee of the Philips group and, starting in 2005,  
was in charge of sustainable development. From 2008 to 2013, she  
was a member of the Management Board of Siemens AG. She has  
been responsible for sustainable development at the Group and  
in charge of the Group’s supply chain. Since 2013, she has been  
a member of the Supervisory Board of Henkel and a member  
of the Board of Directors of Firmenich S.A.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 11, 2012 and until 2015.  
Holds 1,195 shares.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 13, 2011 and until 2014.  
Member of the Strategic Committee.  
Holds 1,000 shares.  
Current directorships  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of Bouygues*  
Director of Saint Gobain*  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Vallourec*  
Director of Mediobanca S.p.A.* (Italy)  
Current directorships  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Henkel* since 2013  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
– Member of the Board of Directors of Firmenich S.A. since 2013  
Director of Umicore* as of January 1, 2014  
None.  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Member of the Management Board of Siemens AG* until 2013  
– Member of the Board of Directors of INSEAD until 2011  
Member of the Board of Directors of ZF Friedrichshafen AG until  
011  
Charles Keller  
Born on November 15, 1980 (French).  
Director representing employee shareholders.  
2
A graduate of the École Polytechnique and the École des Hautes  
Etudes Commerciales (HEC), Charles Keller joined the Group in 2005  
at the refinery in Normandy as a performance auditor. In 2008, he  
was named Project Manager at the Grandpuits refinery to improve  
the site’s energy efficiency and oversee its reliability plan. In 2010,  
he joined Exploration & Production and Yemen LNG as a reliability  
engineer and then became head of the Production Support  
department in charge of optimizing the plant. Charles Keller has  
been an elected member, representing holders of fund units,  
of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”  
collective investment fund since November 2012. He is also an  
elected member of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL DIVERSIFIÉ  
A DOMINANTE ACTIONS”, “TOTAL ACTIONS EUROPÉENNES”  
and “TOTAL EPARGNE SOLIDAIRE” collective investment funds.  
– Member of the Board of Directors of Firmenich S.A. until 2010  
Gérard Lamarche  
Born on July 15, 1961 (Belgian).  
Independent director.  
Mr. Lamarche graduated in economic science from Louvain-la-Neuve  
University and the INSEAD business school (Advanced Management  
Program for Suez Group Executives). He also followed the Global  
Leadership Series course of training at the Wharton International  
Forum in 1998-99. He started his career in 1983 at Deloitte Haskins  
&
Sells in Belgium, before becoming a consultant in mergers and  
acquisitions in Holland in 1987. In 1988, Mr. Lamarche joined Société  
Générale de Belgique as an investment manager and management  
controller between 1989 and 1991, then as a consultant in strategic  
operations from 1992 to 1995. He joined Compagnie Financière  
de Suez as a project manager for the Chairman and Secretary of the  
Executive Committee (1995-1997), before taking part in the merger  
between Compagnie de Suez and Lyonnaise des Eaux, which became  
Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux (1997), and then being appointed as the  
acting Managing Director in charge of Planning, Management Control  
and Accounts. In 2000, Mr. Lamarche pursued his career in industry  
by joining NALCO (the American subsidiary of the Suez group and  
the world leader in the treatment of industrial water) as the Director  
and Chief Executive Officer. In March 2004, he was appointed Chief  
Financial Officer of the Suez group. In April 2011, Mr. Lamarche  
became a director on the Board of Directors of Groupe Bruxelles  
Lambert (GBL). He has been the acting Managing Director since  
January 2012. Mr. Lamarche is currently a director of Lafarge,  
Legrand, TOTAL S.A. and SGS SA. He is also a non-voting member  
(censeur) on the Board of Directors of GDF Suez.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since May 17, 2013 and until 2016.  
Holds 430 TOTAL shares and 54 shares of the “TOTAL  
ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund.  
Current directorships  
Director of TOTAL S.A.* representing employee shareholders.  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
None.  
Barbara Kux  
Born on February 26, 1954 (Swiss).  
Independent director.  
Holder of an MBA (with honors) from INSEAD in Fontainebleau,  
Ms. Kux joined McKinsey & Company in 1984 as a Management  
Consultant, where she was responsible for strategic assignments  
for international groups. After serving as manager for development  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2012. Last renewal: May 17, 2013  
until 2016.  
*
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
104  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Member of the Audit Committee and the Strategic Committee.  
Holds 2,775 shares.  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
– Director of GDF Suez* until April 23, 2012  
Chairperson of the Management Board of Areva* until  
June 30, 2011  
Current directorships  
Acting Managing Director and Director of Groupe Bruxelles  
Lambert*  
– Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of Areva NC until  
June 30, 2011  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Legrand*  
Director of Lafarge*  
Director of SGS SA* (Switzerland)  
Non-voting member (censeur) of GDF Suez*  
– Vice Chairperson and Member of the Supervisory Board of  
Safran* until 2009  
Claude Mandil  
Born on January 9, 1942 (French).  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Independent director.  
Director of Electrabel until 2011  
A graduate of the École Polytechnique and a General Engineer from  
France’s engineering school Corps des Mines, Mr. Mandil served as  
a Mining Engineer in the Lorraine and Bretagne regions. He then  
served as Project Manager at the Délégation de l’Aménagement du  
Territoire et de l’Action Régionale (City and Department planning  
Director of Suez Environnement Company until 2011  
Director of International Power Plc until 2011  
Director of Europalia International until 2011  
Director of GDF Suez Belgium until 2011  
Director of Agua de Barcelona until 2011  
Director of GDF Suez E.S. until 2011  
Director of Suez Tractebel until 2011  
Director of Fortis Banque until 2010  
Director of Leo Holding Company until 2009  
Director of Suez Environnement North America until 2009  
DATAR) and as Interdepartmental Head of Industry and Research  
and regional delegate of the Agence nationale de valorisation de la  
recherche (State technology transfer agency – ANVAR). From 1981  
to 1982, he served as technical advisor on the staff of the Prime  
Minister, in charge of the industry, energy and research sectors. He  
was appointed Chief Executive Officer, then Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of the Institut de Développement Industriel  
Anne Lauvergeon  
Born on August 2, 1959 (French).  
Independent director.  
(Industry Development Institute – IDI) until 1988. He was Chief  
Executive Officer of the Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et  
Minières (BRGM) from 1988 to 1990. From 1990 to 1998, Mr. Mandil  
served as Chief Executive Officer for Energy and Commodities at  
the French Industry Ministry and became France’s first representative  
to the Management Board of the International Energy Agency (IEA).  
He served as Chairman of the IEA from 1997 to 1998. In 1998, he  
was appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Gaz de France  
and, in April 2000, Chairman of the Institut Français du Pétrole  
(French Institute for Oil). From 2003 to 2007, he was the Executive  
Director of the IEA. Mr. Mandil is also director of the Institut Veolia  
Environnement and of Schlumberger SBC Energy Institute.  
Chief Mining Engineer and a graduate of the École Normale  
Supérieure with a doctorate in physical sciences, Ms. Lauvergeon  
held various positions in industry before becoming Deputy Chief of  
Staff in the Office of the President of the Republic in 1990. She joined  
Lazard Frères et Cie as Managing Partner in 1995. From 1997  
to 1999, she was Executive Vice President and member of the  
Executive Committee of Alcatel, in charge of industrial partnerships  
and international affairs. Ms. Lauvergeon served as Chairperson of  
the Management Board of Areva from July 2001 to June 2011 and  
as Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of Areva NC (formerly  
Cogema) from June 1999 to June 2011. She has been Chairperson  
and Chief Executive Officer of ALP S.A. since 2011.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2008. Last renewal: May 13, 2011  
until 2014.  
Member of the Strategic Committee, the Compensation Committee  
and the Governance & Ethics Committee.  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000. Last renewal: May 11, 2012  
until 2015.  
Holds 1,000 shares.  
Member of the Strategic Committee.  
Holds 2,000 shares.  
Current directorships  
– Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
None.  
Current directorships  
Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer of ALP S.A.  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of Vodafone Group Plc*  
Director of Airbus Group NV* (formerly EADS)  
Director of American Express*  
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board of Libération  
Michel Pébereau  
Born on January 23, 1942 (French).  
Independent director.  
Honorary Inspector General of Finance, Mr. Pébereau held various  
positions in the Ministry of Economy and Finance, before serving,  
from 1982 to 1993, as Chief Executive Officer and then as Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer of Crédit Commercial de France  
*
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
105  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
(CCF).He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BNP then  
Current directorships  
BNP Paribas from 1993 to 2003, Chairman of the Board of Directors  
from 2003 to 2011, and is currently Honorary Chairman of BNP  
Paribas and Chairman of the BNP Paribas foundation. He is also  
a member of the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques,  
member of the Policy Board of the Institut de l’Entreprise, Honorary  
Chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Institut Aspen and  
Director of the ARC foundation.  
Director of TOTAL S.A.*  
Director of BNP Paribas*  
Director of Airbus Group NV* (formerly EADS)  
Director of Pargesa Holding S.A.* (Switzerland)  
Director of BNP Paribas SA (Switzerland)  
Member of the Supervisory Board of Banque Marocaine  
pour le Commerce et l’Industrie*  
Director of TOTAL S.A. since 2000. Last renewal: May 11, 2012  
until 2015.  
– Non-voting member (censeur) of Galeries Lafayette  
Directorships that expired in the previous five years  
Chairman of the Compensation Committee.  
Holds 2,356 shares.  
Director of AXA* until 2013  
– Director of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain* until 2013  
Chairman of the Board of Directors of BNP Paribas  
until December 2011  
Director of Lafarge* until May 2011  
1.1.2. Expired directorship of TOTAL S.A. in 2013  
Claude Clément  
of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL DIVERSIFIÉ  
À DOMINANTE OBLIGATIONS”, “TOTAL MONÉTAIRE”  
and “TOTAL OBLIGATIONS” collective investment funds.  
Born on November 17, 1956 (French).  
Mr. Clément joined the Group in February 1977 and started his  
career at Compagnie Française de Raffinage, which offered him  
professional training. He held various positions at the Refining  
Manufacturing Department in French and African refineries  
Director of TOTAL S.A. representing employee shareholders  
from May 21, 2010 to May 17, 2013.  
Directorship that expired in the previous five years  
(
Gabon, Cameroon).  
Director of TOTAL S.A.* representing employee shareholders  
until May 17, 2013  
While in office, Mr. Clément was Manager of the Refining  
Manufacturing Methods at the Refining Manufacturing Division.  
He was an elected member of the Supervisory Board of the  
– Elected member of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL  
ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” collective investment fund until 2012  
– President of the Supervisory Board of the “TOTAL ACTIONS  
EUROPÉENNES” collective investment fund until 2011.  
TOTAL ACTIONS EUROPÉENNES”, “TOTAL DIVERSIFIÉ À  
DOMINANTE ACTIONS” and “TOTAL ÉPARGNE SOLIDAIRE”  
collective investment funds from 2010, and an elected member  
1
.1.3. Summary of changes in the composition of the Board of Directors  
(
information as of February 11, 2014)  
Changes in the composition of the Board of Directors in 2013  
At the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013, the directorships  
of Messrs. Desmarest, Brock and Lamarche were renewed for a  
which represents 85%(1) of the directors, are independent  
(see point 1.8. below). The number of independent members  
of the Board of Directors is therefore higher than the number  
recommended by the AFEP-MEDEF Corporate Governance Code,  
to which the Company refers and which specifies that at least  
one half of the members of the Board at widely held companies  
with no controlling shareholders must be independent.  
3-year term expiring at the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting held  
in 2016 to approve the 2015 financial statements. Mr. Keller was  
appointed director representing employee shareholders, also for a  
3-year term, replacing Mr. Clément whose term was due to expire.  
As of February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors had fifteen  
members, including one director appointed by the shareholders to  
represent employee shareholders. Twelve of the Board members,  
The profiles, qualifications and expertise of the Directors are provided  
in the biographies that appear in points 1.1.1. to 1.1.2. above.  
(
*
1) Not including the director representing employee shareholders, according to the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
Company names marked with an asterisk are publicly-listed companies. Underlined companies are companies that do not belong to the group in which the director has his or her main duties.  
106  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Directors  
Independence  
Participation in Board Committees(a)  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Thierry Desmarest  
Chairman of the Strategic Committee  
Chairman of the Governance & Ethics Committee  
Member of the Compensation Committee  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Honorary Chairman  
Patrick Artus  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Member of the Governance & Ethics Committee  
Member of the Compensation Committee  
Chairperson of the Audit Committee  
Patricia Barbizet  
Gunnar Brock  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Member of the Governance and Ethics Committee  
Member of the Compensation Committee  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette  
Bertrand Collomb  
Paul Desmarais, jr  
Anne-Marie Idrac  
Charles Keller  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Director representing  
employee shareholders  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Member of the Audit Committee  
Member of the Governance & Ethics Committee  
Barbara Kux  
Gérard Lamarche  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Member of the Audit Committee  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Member of the Governance & Ethics Committee  
Member of the Compensation Committee  
Member of the Strategic Committee  
Chairman of the Compensation Committee  
Anne Lauvergeon  
Claude Mandil  
Independent director  
Independent director  
Michel Pébereau  
Independent director  
(a) For more details on the composition of the Board Committees, refer to point 1.5. below.  
Board of Directors diversity policy  
The Board of Directors places a great deal of importance on its  
composition and that of its Committees. In particular, it relies on the  
work of the Governance & Ethics Committee, which reviews annually  
and proposes, as circumstances may require, desirable changes  
in the composition of the Board of Directors and Committees  
based on the Group’s strategy.  
As of February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors had four  
members of foreign nationality (27% of the directors) and five  
women (one-third of the directors, i.e., a higher proportion  
of women than recommended in the AFEP-MEDEF Code).  
According to the recommendations introduced in April 2010 in the  
AFEP-MEDEF Code regarding balanced representation of men and  
women on boards, the proportion of women on boards of directors  
was supposed to be at least 20% within three years of the 2010  
Shareholders’ Meeting and should be at least 40% within six years  
of that same Shareholders’ Meeting. These requirements were  
also stipulated in the French law of January 27, 2011 regarding  
balanced representation of men and women on Boards of Directors  
and Supervisory Boards and equal opportunity. Pursuant to this  
law, the 20% target must be reached by the end of the 2014  
Shareholders’ Meeting and the 40% target must be reached  
by the end of the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting.  
The Governance & Ethics Committee conducts its work within the  
context of a formal procedure so as to ensure the complementarity  
of the Directors’ competencies and the diversity of their profiles,  
maintain a rate of independence for the Board as a whole that is  
relevant to the Company’s governance structure and the structure  
of its shareholder base, strive for a balanced representation  
of men and women on the Board, and promote an appropriate  
representation of directors of different nationalities.  
As part of an effort that began several years ago, the composition  
of the Board of Directors has changed significantly since 2010 to  
achieve a more balanced representation of men and women and an  
openness to more international profiles.  
The Board of Directors will continue its reflections on diversifying its  
composition in the years to come, with the aim of having women  
represent more than 40% of the members of the Board of Directors  
as set out in the law and in the AFEP-MEDEF Code and  
maintaining an international representation.  
Renewals of directorships proposed at the 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting  
At its meeting held on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors  
decided to propose at the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’ Meeting the  
renewal of the directorships of Mmes. Barbizet, Coisne-Roquette  
and Kux and Mr. Desmarais, jr for a 3-year term that will expire at  
the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial  
statements for the 2016 financial year.  
If the proposed resolutions are approved, the Board of Directors  
would have fourteen members at the end of the May 16, 2014  
Shareholders’ Meeting (compared with fifteen previously), as Mr.  
Mandil has not requested the renewal of his directorship, which is  
due to expire.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
107  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
1.2. Other information  
At its meeting on September 15, 2009, the Board of Directors  
appointed Mr. Charles Paris de Bollardière Secretary of the Board.  
Council attend, with consultative rights, all meetings of the Board.  
In compliance with the second paragraph of such article, since  
July 7, 2010 four members of the Worker’s Council attend Board  
meetings as of February 11, 2014.  
Representatives of the Worker’s Council: pursuant to Article  
L. 2323-62 of the French Labor Code, members of the Worker’s  
1.3. Corporate Governance Code  
For several years, TOTAL has been actively examining corporate  
governance matters. At its meeting on November 4, 2008, the  
Board of Directors confirmed its decision to refer to the Corporate  
Governance Code for Listed Companies published by the principal  
French business confederations, the Association Française des  
Entreprises Privées (AFEP) and the Mouvement des Entreprises  
de France (MEDEF) (“AFEP-MEDEF Code”) for corporate  
governance matters.  
The AFEP-MEDEF Code is available on the MEDEF website  
(medef.com/medef-corporate/publications).  
The AFEP-MEDEF Code was revised in June 2013 to introduce  
new changes regarding, in particular, a consultation procedure  
in which shareholders can express an opinion on the individual  
compensation of the executive directors (dirigeants mandataires  
sociaux) (say on pay), as well as the establishment of a High  
Committee for corporate governance, an independent structure  
in charge of monitoring implementation of the Code.  
Pursuant to Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code, the following table sets forth the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF  
Code that the Company has not followed and the reasons for such decision.  
Recommendations not followed  
Explanation – Practice followed by TOTAL  
Director independence criteria  
In assessing the independence of four directors, the Board has  
disregarded the criterion of a maximum term of office of twelve  
years. The Board was of the opinion that this criterion had no  
relevance given, on the one hand, the specific characteristics of the  
oil and gas sector, which relies on long-term investment cycles on  
one hand, and, on the other hand, the objectivity that these four  
directors have demonstrated in the Board’s activity on the other  
hand. In addition, it deemed that the experience acquired on the  
Board by these four directors strengthened their freedom of speech  
and their independence of judgment and, therefore, benefited the  
Group. The Board also noted that the criterion related to the length  
of term of office was not one of the independence criteria required  
by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). See point 1.8. below.  
(
paragraph 9 of the Code)  
Criteria to be examined for a director to be considered as independent:  
Has not been a director of the Company for more than twelve years.  
The Board of Directors’ assessment  
paragraph 10.4 of the Code)  
Although the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors do not  
expressly provide that one meeting of the non-executive directors  
be held per year without the participation of the executive or  
(
It is recommended that non-executive directors meet periodically  
without the participation of the executive or “in house” directors.  
The rules of procedure of the Board of Directors should provide  
for one meeting of this kind per year, during which the performance  
of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and the Deputy Chief  
Executive Officer(s) would be evaluated, and which would be an  
opportunity to reflect periodically on the future of the Company’s  
management.  
“in house” directors, the Board of Directors’ practice constitutes  
a mechanism which has the same effect as the recommendation  
made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
At its meeting held each year in February, the Board of Directors  
indeed evaluates the performances of the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer and, where applicable, reflects on the future  
of the Company’s management. When these particular matters  
are reviewed, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as  
the members of the Executive Committee present at the meeting  
(that are not executive and non-executive directors), leave the  
Board meeting. The Honorary Chairman then serves as Chairman  
of the Board with regard to these matters.  
108  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Recommendations not followed  
Grant of performance shares  
Explanation – Practice followed by TOTAL  
Given the share holding requirements that the Board of Directors  
impose on the executive directors whereby such directors must  
hold a number of shares of the Company equivalent in value to two  
years of the fixed portion of their annual compensation, and given  
the number of TOTAL shares and shares of the “Total Actionnariat  
France” collective investment fund (invested exclusively in TOTAL  
(paragraph 23.2.4 of the Code)  
In accordance with terms determined by the Board and announced  
upon the award, the performance shares awarded to executive  
directors are conditional upon the acquisition of a defined quantity  
of shares once the awarded shares are available.  
(1)  
shares) effectively held by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ,  
the Board of Directors, upon the Compensation Committee’s  
proposal, deemed that it was not necessary, at the time of grant, to  
make the performance shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer subject to the purchase of a quantity of shares at  
the time of availability of the performance shares. The share holding  
requirements to which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
is subject constitute a mechanism that has the same effect as the  
recommendation made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
Additional pension schemes  
(paragraph 23.2.6 of the Code)  
Supplementary pension schemes with defined benefits must  
It appeared justified not to deprive the concerned beneficiaries  
be subject to the condition that the beneficiary must be a director of the benefit of the pension commitments made by the Company  
or employee of the Company when claiming his or her pension  
rights pursuant to the applicable rules.  
in special cases of the disability or departure of a beneficiary over  
55 years of age at the initiative of the Group.  
1.4. Rules of procedure of the Board of Directors  
At its meeting on February 13, 2007, the Board of Directors  
adopted rules of procedure to replace the Directors’ Charter.  
They are reviewed on a regular basis to match the changes in rules  
and practices related to governance.  
The Board’s rules of procedure specify the obligations of each  
director and set forth the mission and working procedures of the  
Board of Directors. They also define the respective responsibilities  
and authority of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer.  
The unabridged version of these rules of procedure is available  
herein in its latest version dated October 30, 2012.  
The rules of procedure are also available on the Company’s website.  
The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.(2) approved the rules of procedure.  
1. MISSION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS  
The mission of the Board of Directors is to determine the strategic direction of the Company and supervise the implementation of this vision.  
With the exception of the powers and authority expressly reserved for shareholders and within the limits of the Company’s legal purpose,  
the Board may address any issue related to the operation of the Company and take any decision concerning the matters falling within  
its purview. Within this framework, the Board’s duties and responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:  
appointing the executive directors (3) and supervising the handling of their responsibilities;  
defining the Company’s strategic orientation and, more generally, that of the Group;  
approving investments or divestments under study by the Group that concern amounts greater than 3% of shareholders’ equity;  
reviewing information on significant events related to the Company’s affairs, in particular for investments or divestments that are greater  
than 1% of shareholders’ equity;  
(
1) As of December 31, 2013, Mr. de Margerie held 121,556 shares of TOTAL, including 16,000 performance shares that had been definitively granted to him on September 15, 2013  
within the scope of the performance share plan dated September 14, 2011, as well as 65,242 shares of the “Total Actionnariat France” collective investment fund.  
2) TOTAL S.A. is referred to in the rules of procedure as the “Company” and collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries as the “Group”.  
(
(
3) “Executive directors” means the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer if the Chairman of the Board of Directors is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and otherwise the Chairman  
of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, as well as, where applicable, any Deputy Chief Executive Officer, based on the organization adopted by the Board of Directors.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
109  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
conducting audits and investigations as it may deem appropriate. The Board, with the assistance of the Audit Committee where  
appropriate, ensures that:  
-
the proper definition of authority within the Company and the proper exercise of duties and responsibilities by the bodies of the  
Company are in place;  
-
no individual is authorized to contract on behalf of the Company or to commit to pay, or to make payments, on behalf of the Company,  
without proper supervision and control;  
-
-
the internal control function operates properly and that the statutory auditors are able to conduct their audits under appropriate circumstances;  
the committees it has created duly perform their responsibilities;  
monitoring the quality of the information provided to the shareholders and the financial markets through the financial statements that it  
approves and the annual reports, or when major transactions are conducted;  
convening and setting the agenda for Shareholders’ Meetings or meetings of bond holders;  
preparing, for each year, a list of the directors it deems to be independent under generally recognized corporate governance criteria.  
2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE DIRECTORS OF TOTAL S.A.  
Before accepting a directorship, every candidate receives a copy of TOTAL S.A.’s bylaws and these rules of procedure. He ensures  
that he has broad knowledge of the general and particular commitments related to his duty, especially the laws and regulations governing  
directorships in French limited liability companies (société anonyme) whose shares are listed in one or several regulated markets.  
Accepting a directorship involves upholding the Directors’ ethical rules as described in the Code of Corporate Governance to which the  
Company refers. It also involves upholding the rules of procedure and the Group’s values as described in its Code of Conduct.  
When directors participate in and vote at Board meetings, they are required to represent the interest of the shareholders and the Company  
as a whole.  
2.1. INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT  
Directors undertake, under any circumstance, to maintain the independence of their analysis, judgment, decision-making and actions as well  
as not to be unduly influenced, directly or indirectly, by other directors, particular groups of shareholders, creditors, suppliers and, more  
generally, any third party.  
2.2. PARTICIPATION IN THE BOARD’S WORK  
Directors undertake to devote the amount of time required to consider the information they are given and otherwise prepare for meetings  
of the Board and of the committees on which they sit. Directors may request any additional information that they feel is necessary or useful  
from the executive directors. Directors, if they consider it necessary, may request training on the Company’s specificities, businesses and  
activities, and any other training that is of use in the exercise of their duties as Directors.  
Directors attend all Board meetings and all committees or Shareholders’ Meetings, unless they have previously contacted the Chairman of  
the Board to inform him of scheduling conflicts.  
Files reviewed at each meeting of the Board as well as the information collected before or during the meetings are confidential. Directors  
cannot use them for or share them with a third party whatever the reason. Directors take any necessary measures to keep them confidential.  
Confidentiality and privacy are lifted when such information is made publicly available by the Company.  
The Chairman of the Board makes sure that the Company provides the directors with the relevant information, including criticisms,  
in particular financial statement reports and press releases, and the main press articles about the Company.  
2.3. DUTY OF LOYALTY  
Directors cannot take advantage of their office or duties to ensure, for themselves or a third party, any monetary or non-monetary benefit.  
They notify the Board of Directors of any potential conflicts of interest with the Company or any other company of the Group. They refrain  
from participating in the vote relating to the corresponding resolution or even to the debate preceding the vote.  
Directors must inform the Board of Directors of their entering into a transaction that involves directly the Company or any other company  
of the Group before such transaction is closed.  
Directors cannot take any responsibility in a personal capacity in companies or businesses that are competing with the Company or any  
other company of the Group without previously informing the Board.  
Directors are committed not to seek or accept directly or indirectly from the Company or any other company of the Group benefits that  
may be considered as compromising their independence.  
2.4. DUTY OF EXPRESSION  
Directors are committed to clearly expressing their opposition if they deem that a decision made by the Board of Directors is contrary  
to the Company’s corporate interest and should strive to convince the Board of the relevancy of their position.  
110  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
2.5. TRANSACTIONS IN THE COMPANY’S SECURITIES AND STOCK EXCHANGE RULES  
While in office, directors are required to hold the minimum number of registered shares of the Company as set by the bylaws.  
In general, directors must act with the highest degree of prudence and vigilance when completing any personal transaction involving  
the financial instruments of the Company, its subsidiaries and affiliates which are listed or issue listed financial instruments.  
To this purpose, directors act in compliance with the following procedures:  
1
. Any shares and ADRs of TOTAL S.A. and its publicly-traded subsidiaries are to be held in registered form, either with the Company or its  
agent, or administered registered shares with a French broker (or U.S. broker for ADRs) whose contact details are communicated to the  
Board’s Secretary by the director.  
2
. Directors refrain from directly or indirectly completing (or recommending the completion of) any transaction involving the financial  
instruments (shares, ADRs or any other financial instruments related to such financial instruments) of the Company, its publicly-traded  
subsidiaries or affiliates or listed financial instruments for which the director has inside information.  
Inside information is specific information which has not yet been made public and which directly or indirectly concerns one or more issuers  
of financial instruments or one or more financial instruments and which, if it were made public, could have a significant impact on the price  
of the financial instruments concerned or on the price of financial instruments related to them.  
3
. Any transaction on the Company’s financial instruments (share, ADR or related financial instruments) is strictly prohibited on the day  
when the Company discloses its periodic earnings (quarterly, interim and annual) as well as the thirty calendar days preceding such date.  
. Moreover, directors comply, where applicable, with the provisions of Article L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, which  
stipulates that free shares may not be sold:  
4
during the ten trading days preceding and the three trading days following the date on which the Consolidated Financial Statements or,  
failing that, the annual financial statements, are made public;  
during the period between the date on which the Company’s corporate bodies have knowledge of information which, if it were made  
public, could have a significant impact on the price of the shares of the Company, and ten trading days following the date on which such  
information is made public.  
5
. Directors are prohibited from carrying out any transaction on financial instruments related to the Company’s share (Paris option market  
MONEP), warrants, exchangeable bonds, etc.) and from buying on margin or short selling such financial instruments.  
. Directors are also prohibited from hedging the shares of the Company and any financial instruments related to them, and in particular:  
(
6
all shares of the Company which they hold, and, where applicable,  
Company share subscription or purchase options,  
rights to the shares of the Company which may be awarded free of charge,  
shares of the Company from the exercise of options or granted free of charge.  
7
. Directors make all necessary arrangements to declare to the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers)  
and inform the Board’s secretary, under the form and timeframe provided for by applicable laws, of any transaction on the Company’s  
securities entered into by himself or any other individual with whom he is closely related.  
3. WORKINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS  
The Board of Directors meets at least four times a year and as often as circumstances may require.  
Before each meeting of the Board, the agenda is sent out to directors and, whenever possible, it is sent together with the documents  
that are necessary to consider.  
Directors can delegate their authority to another director at the meetings of the Board, within the limit of one delegation per director per meeting.  
Each director may represent only one of his/her colleagues during the same Board meeting.  
Whenever authorized by the law, those directors attending the meeting of the Board via video conference (in compliance with the technical  
requirements set by applicable regulations) are considered present for the calculation of the quorum and majority.  
The Board allocates directors’ fees to, and may allocate additional directors’ fees to, directors who participate on specialized committees  
within the total amount established by the Shareholders’ Meeting. The executive directors are not awarded directors’ fees for their work on  
the Board and Committees.  
The Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of its Chairman, appoints a Secretary. Every member of the Board of Directors can  
refer to the Secretary and benefit from his assistance. The Secretary is responsible for the working procedures of the Board of Directors.  
The Board shall review such procedures periodically.  
The Board conducts, at regular intervals not to exceed three years, an assessment of its practices. Such assessment is carried out possibly  
under the supervision of an independent director with the contribution of an outside counsel. In addition, the Board of Directors conducts  
an annual discussion of its methods.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
111  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
4. RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY OF THE CHAIRMAN  
The Chairman represents the Board, and, except under exceptional circumstances, is the sole member authorized to act and speak on  
behalf of the Board.  
He is responsible for organizing and presiding over the Board’s activities and monitors corporate bodies to ensure that they are functioning  
effectively and respecting corporate governance principles. He coordinates the activity of the Board and its committees. He sets the agenda  
for the meeting by including the issues proposed by the Chief Executive Officer.  
He ensures that directors have in due course clear and appropriate information that is necessary to carry out their duties.  
He is responsible, with the Group’s general management, for maintaining relations between the Board and the Company’s shareholders.  
He monitors the quality of the information disclosed by the Company.  
In close cooperation with the Group’s general management, he may represent the Group in high-level discussions with government  
authorities and the Group’s important partners, on both a national and international level.  
He is regularly informed by the Chief Executive Officer of events and situations that are important for the Group relating to the strategy,  
organization, monthly financial reporting, major investment and divestment projects and major financial operations. He may request that  
the Chief Executive Officer or other Company officers, provided the Chief Executive Officer is informed, provide any useful information  
for the Board or its committees to carry out their duties.  
He may meet with the statutory auditors in order to prepare the work of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee.  
He presents every year in a report to the Shareholders’ Meeting on the conditions surrounding the preparation and organization of the  
Board’s work, the potential limits set by the Board of Directors concerning the powers of the Chief Executive Officer, and the internal control  
procedures implemented by the Company. For this purpose, he receives from the Chief Executive Officer the relevant information.  
5. AUTHORITY OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the general management of the Company. He chairs the Group’s Executive Committee  
and Management Committee. Subject to the Company’s corporate governance rules and in particular the rules of procedure of the Board  
of Directors, he has the full extent of authority to act on behalf of the Company in all instances, with the exception of actions that are,  
by law, reserved to the Board of Directors or to Shareholders’ meetings.  
The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for periodic reporting of the Group’s results and outlook to shareholders and the financial  
community.  
At each meeting of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer reports the highlights of the Group’s activity.  
6. COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS  
The Board of Directors decided the creation of:  
an Audit Committee,  
a Nominating & Governance Committee,  
a Compensation Committee, and  
a Strategic Committee.  
The missions and composition of these committees are defined in their relevant rules of procedure approved by the Board of Directors.  
The Committees carry out their duty for and report to the Board of Directors.  
Each committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.  
112  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
1.5. Committees of the Board of Directors  
The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Committees of the Board of Directors is available herein, followed by the  
composition of each Committee.  
1.5.1. Audit Committee  
The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Audit Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 12, 2013,  
is available herein.  
Rules of procedure (unabridged version)  
The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries,  
as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Audit Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).  
The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors  
of TOTAL S.A.  
I. DUTIES  
To allow the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. to ensure that internal control is effective and that published information available to  
shareholders and financial markets is reliable, the duties of the Committee include:  
recommending the appointment of statutory auditors and their compensation, ensuring their independence and monitoring their work;  
establishing the rules for the use of statutory auditors for non-audit services and verifying their implementation;  
supervising the audit by the statutory auditors of the Company’s statutory financial statements and Consolidated Financial Statements;  
examining the assumptions used to prepare the financial statements, assessing the validity of the methods used to handle significant  
transactions and examining the Company’s statutory financial statements and consolidated annual, semi-annual, and quarterly financial  
statements prior to their examination by the Board of Directors, after regularly monitoring the financial situation, cash position and  
commitments included in the annual financial statements of the Company;  
supervising the implementation of internal control and risk management procedures and their effective application, with the assistance  
of the internal audit department;  
supervising procedures for preparing financial information;  
monitoring the implementation and activities of the disclosure committee, including reviewing the conclusions of this committee;  
reviewing the annual work program of internal and external auditors;  
receiving information periodically on completed audits and examining annual internal audit reports and other reports (statutory auditors,  
annual report, etc.);  
reviewing the choice of appropriate accounting principles and methods used to prepare the Company’s consolidated and statutory  
financial statements and ensuring the continuity of the methods;  
reviewing the Group’s policy for the use of derivative instruments;  
reviewing, if requested by the Board of Directors, major transactions contemplated by the Group;  
reviewing significant litigation annually;  
implementing and monitoring compliance with the financial code of ethics;  
proposing to the Board of Directors, for implementation, a procedure for complaints or concerns of employees, shareholders and others,  
related to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and monitoring the implementation of this procedure;  
where applicable, reviewing significant transactions of the Group during which a conflict of interest may have occurred; and  
reviewing the procedure for booking the Group’s proved reserves.  
II. COMPOSITION  
The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. Members must be independent directors.  
In selecting the members of the Committee, the Board of Directors pays particular attention to their independence and their financial  
and accounting qualifications.  
The Board of Directors appoints one of the members of the Committee to serve as the “financial expert” on the Committee.  
Members of the Committee may not be executive directors of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, nor own more than 10% of the  
Company’s shares, whether directly or indirectly, individually or acting together with another party.  
Members of the Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than:  
(i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee of  
the Company’s Board; and (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company,  
which are not dependent upon future work or activities.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
113  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member  
of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.  
However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.  
III. ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES  
The Committee appoints its own Chairman. The Chairman appoints the Committee secretary, who may be the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  
The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.  
The Committee meets at least seven times a year: each quarter to review the statutory financial statements of TOTAL S.A., the annual and  
quarterly Consolidated Financial Statements, and at least three other times a year to review matters not directly related to the review  
of the quarterly financial statements.  
The Committee may also meet at the request of its Chairman, at least one half of its members, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,  
and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are separate, the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
or the Chief Executive Officer.  
The Committee Chairman prepares the schedule of its meetings.  
At each committee meeting where the quarterly financial statements are reviewed, the Group’s Chief Financial Officer presents the consolidated  
and statutory financial statements of TOTAL S.A. as well as the Group’s financial position and, in particular, its liquidity, cash flow and debt  
situation. A memo describing the Company’s risk exposure and off-balance sheet commitments is communicated to the Audit Committee.  
This review of the financial statements includes a presentation by the statutory auditors underscoring the key points observed during their work.  
As part of monitoring the efficiency of the internal control and risk management systems, the Committee is informed of the work program  
of the Group Internal Control and Audit Department and its organization, on which it may issue an opinion. The Committee also receives a  
summary of the internal audit reports, which is presented at each committee meeting where the quarterly financial statements are reviewed.  
The risk management processes implemented within the Group and updates to them are presented regularly to the Audit Committee.  
The Committee may meet with the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and  
Chief Executive Officer are separate, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer and, if applicable, any Deputy Chief  
Executive Officer of the Company, and perform inspections and consult with managers of operating or non-operating departments, as may  
be useful in performing its duties. The Chairman of the committee gives prior notice of such meeting to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer and, if the functions of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are separate, both the Chairman of the Board  
of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer. In particular, the Committee is authorized to consult with those involved in preparing or auditing  
the financial statements (Chief Financial Officer and principal Finance Department managers, Audit Department, Legal Department) by asking  
the Company’s Chief Financial Officer to call them to a meeting.  
The Committee consults with the statutory auditors and, at least once a year, without any Company representative being present. If it is informed  
of a substantial irregularity, it recommends that the Board of Directors take all appropriate action.  
If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external  
consultants.  
The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee  
meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of members is present at the meeting.  
The Committee can adopt proposals intended for the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree  
and sign each proposal.  
A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.  
IV. REPORT  
The Committee submits written reports to the Board of Directors regarding its work.  
It periodically evaluates its performance based on these rules of procedure and, if applicable, offers suggestions for improving its performance.  
Members of the Audit Committee in 2013  
The Committee is made up of three members.  
The Committee’s members are Ms. Barbizet, Ms. Coisne-Roquette and Mr. Lamarche.  
All of the members of the Committee are independent directors (see point 1.8. below) and have recognized experience in the financial and  
accounting fields, as illustrated in their summary professional background (see point 1.1. above).  
The Committee is chaired by Ms. Barbizet.  
At its meeting on July 28, 2011, the Board of Directors decided to appoint Ms. Barbizet to serve as the Audit Committee financial expert  
based on a recommendation by the Audit Committee.  
A summary of the Committee’s activities in 2013 is provided in point 1.6.1. below.  
114  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
1.5.2. Compensation Committee  
The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Compensation Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on February 9, 2012,  
is available herein.  
Rules of procedure (unabridged version)  
The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries,  
as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Compensation Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).  
The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors  
of TOTAL S.A.  
The Committee is focused on:  
examining the executive compensation policies implemented by the Group and the compensation of members of the Executive Committee;  
evaluating the performance and recommending the compensation of each executive director; and  
preparing reports which the Company must present in these areas.  
I. DUTIES  
The Committee’s duties include:  
1
. examining the main objectives proposed by the Company’s general management regarding compensation of the Group’s executive  
officers, including stock option and restricted share grant plans and equity-based plans, and advising on this subject;  
. presenting recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors concerning:  
2
compensation, pension and life insurance plans, in-kind benefits and other compensation (including severance benefits) for the executive  
directors of the Company; in particular, the Committee proposes compensation structures that take into account the Company’s  
strategy, objectives and earnings and market practices;  
stock option and restricted share grants, particularly grants of restricted shares to the executive directors;  
3. examining the compensation of the members of the Executive Committee, including stock option and restricted share grant plans  
and equity-based plans, pension and insurance plans and in-kind benefits;  
4
5
6
. preparing and presenting reports in accordance with these rules of procedure;  
. examining, for the parts within its remit, reports to be sent by the Board of Directors or its Chairman to the shareholders;  
. preparing recommendations requested at any time by the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the general management of the Company  
regarding compensation.  
II. COMPOSITION  
The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. A majority of the members must be independent directors.  
Members of the Compensation Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any  
compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members  
of another committee of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another  
Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.  
The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member  
of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.  
However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.  
III. ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES  
The Committee appoints its Chairman and its secretary. The secretary is a Company senior executive.  
The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.  
The Committee meets at least twice a year. It meets on an as-needed basis through notice by its Chairman or by one-half of its members.  
The Committee invites the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as applicable, to present recommendations.  
Neither the Chairman nor the Chief Executive Officer may be present during the Committee’s deliberations regarding his own situation.  
If the Chairman of the Board is not the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Chief Executive Officer may not be present during  
the Committee’s deliberations regarding the situation of the Chairman of the Board.  
While maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality for its discussions, the Committee may request from the Chief Executive Officer  
to be assisted by any senior executive of the Company whose skills and qualifications could facilitate the handling of an agenda item.  
If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage  
external consultants.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
115  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee  
meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of Committee members is present at the meeting.  
The Committee can adopt proposals intended for the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree  
and sign each proposal.  
A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.  
IV. REPORT  
The Committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.  
At the request of the Chairman of the Board, the Committee examines all draft reports of the Company regarding compensation  
of the executive officers or any other issues relevant to its area of expertise.  
Members of the Compensation Committee in 2013  
The Compensation Committee is made up of five members.  
The Committee’s members are Messrs. Artus, Brock, Desmarest, Mandil and Pébereau. The Committee is chaired by Mr. Pébereau.  
80% of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Messrs. Artus, Brock, Mandil and  
Pébereau to be independent (see point 1.8. below).  
A summary of the Committee’s activities in 2013 is provided in point 1.6.2. below.  
1.5.3. The Governance & Ethics Committee  
The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Governance & Ethics Committee (formerly Nominating & Governance Committee),  
as approved by the Board of Directors on March 27, 2013, is available herein.  
Rules of procedure (unabridged version)  
The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. (hereafter referred to as the “Company” and, collectively with all its direct and indirect subsidiaries,  
as the “Group”) has approved the following rules of procedure of the Company’s Governance & Ethics Committee (hereafter, the “Committee”).  
The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.  
The Committee is focused on:  
recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as directors, so as to guarantee the scope of coverage  
of the Directors’ competencies and the diversity of their profiles;  
recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as executive directors;  
preparing the Company’s corporate governance rules and supervising their implementation; and  
ensuring compliance with ethics rules and examining any questions related to ethics and situations of conflicting interests.  
I. DUTIES  
The Committee’s duties include:  
1. presenting recommendations to the Board for its membership and the membership of its committees, and the qualification in terms  
of independence of each candidate for Directors’ positions on the Board of Directors;  
2. proposing annually to the Board of Directors the list of directors who may be considered as “independent directors”;  
3. examining, for the parts within its remit, reports to be sent by the Board of Directors or its Chairman to the shareholders;  
4. assisting the Board of Directors in the selection and evaluation of the executive directors and examining the preparation of their possible  
successors, including cases of unforeseeable absence;  
5
6
. recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as directors;  
. recommending to the Board of Directors the persons that are qualified to be appointed as members of a Committee of the Board of  
Directors;  
7
. proposing methods for the Board of Directors to evaluate its performance, and in particular preparing means of regular self-assessment  
of the workings of the Board of Directors, and the possible assessment thereof by an external consultant;  
. proposing to the Board of Directors the terms and conditions for allocating directors’ fees and the conditions under which expenses  
incurred by the directors are reimbursed;  
8
9
1
. developing and recommending to the Board of Directors the corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;  
0. preparing recommendations requested at any time by the Board of Directors or the general management of the Company regarding  
appointments or governance;  
11. examining the conformity of the Company’s governance practices with the recommendations of the Code of Corporate Governance  
adopted by the Company; and  
116  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
12. supervising and monitoring implementation of the Company’s ethics and compliance program and, in this respect, ensuring that the  
necessary procedures for updating the Group’s Code of Conduct are put in place and that this code is disseminated and applied;  
13. examining any questions related to ethics and situations of conflicting interests;  
14. examining changes in the duties of the Board of Directors.  
II. COMPOSITION  
The Committee is made up of at least three directors designated by the Board of Directors. At least one half of the members must be  
independent directors.  
Members of the Governance & Ethics Committee, other than the Company’s executive directors, may not receive from the Company and  
its subsidiaries any compensation other than: (i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or,  
if applicable, as members of another committee of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment  
by the Company, or another Group company, which are not dependent upon future work or activities.  
The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member  
of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.  
However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.  
III. ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES  
The Committee appoints its Chairman and its secretary. The secretary is a Company senior executive.  
The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.  
The Committee meets at least twice a year. It meets on an as-needed basis through notice by its Chairman or by one-half of its members.  
The Committee invites the Chairman of the Board or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as applicable, to present  
recommendations. The executive directors, whether they are members of the Committee or invited to its meetings, may not be present  
at deliberations concerning their own situation.  
While maintaining the appropriate level of confidentiality for its discussions, the Committee may request from the Chief Executive Officer  
to be assisted by any senior executive of the Company whose skills and qualifications could facilitate the handling of an agenda item.  
The Chairman of the Group Ethics Committee, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, may appear before the Governance & Ethics  
Committee at any time. He reports to this Committee each year on his activities and on the results of the ethics program implemented  
by the Company.  
If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external  
consultants.  
The proposals made by the Committee to the Board of Directors are adopted by a majority of the members present at the Committee  
meeting. The Chairman of the Committee casts the deciding vote if an even number of Committee members is present at the meeting.  
The Committee can make proposals to the Board of Directors without meeting if all the members of the Committee so agree and sign  
each proposal.  
A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.  
IV. REPORT  
The Committee reports on its activities to the Board of Directors.  
Members of the Governance & Ethics Committee in 2013  
The Governance & Ethics Committee has five members.  
The Committee’s members are Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb, Desmarest and Mandil. The Committee is chaired by Mr. Desmarest.  
80% of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb  
and Mandil to be independent (see point 1.8. below).  
A summary of the Committee’s activities in 2013 is provided in point 1.6.3. below.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
117  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
1.5.4. Strategic Committee  
The unabridged version of the rules of procedure of the Strategic Committee, as approved by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2013,  
is available herein.  
Rules of procedure (unabridged version)  
The members of the Committee are directors of the Company and therefore uphold the rules of procedure of the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.  
I. DUTIES  
To allow the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. to ensure the Group’s development, the Committee’s duties include:  
examining the overall strategy of the Group proposed by the Company’s general management;  
examining operations that are of particular strategic importance; and  
reviewing competition and the resulting medium and long-term outlook for the Group.  
II. COMPOSITION  
The Committee is made up of at least five directors designated by the Board of Directors.  
Members of the Committee may not receive from the Company and its subsidiaries, either directly or indirectly, any compensation other than:  
(i) directors’ fees paid for their services as directors or as members of the committee, or, if applicable, as members of another committee  
of the Company’s Board; (ii) compensation and pension benefits related to prior employment by the Company, or another Group company,  
which are not dependent upon future work or activities.  
The term of office of the members of the Committee coincides with the term of their appointment as director. The term of office as a member  
of the Committee may be renewed at the same time as the appointment as director.  
However, the Board of Directors can change the composition of the Committee at any time.  
III. ORGANIZATION OF ACTIVITIES  
The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company chairs the Committee. The Chairman appoints the Committee secretary, who may  
be the Secretary of the Board of Directors.  
The Committee deliberates when at least one-half of its members are present. A member of the Committee cannot be represented.  
The Committee meets at least once a year and at the request of its Chairman, at least one-half of its members, or the Chief Executive Officer  
of the Company. The Committee Chairman prepares the schedule of its meetings.  
The Chairman of the Committee may invite other directors to participate in the Committee meetings based on the meeting agenda.  
The Committee may meet with the Chief Executive Officer, and, if applicable, any Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the Company and consult  
with managers of operating or non-operating departments, as may be useful in performing its duties. The Chairman of the Committee, if he is  
not the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, gives prior notice of such meeting to the Chief Executive Officer. In particular, the Committee  
is authorized to consult with the Vice President Strategy & Business Intelligence of the Company or the person delegated by the latter,  
by asking the Company’s Chief Executive Officer to call them to a meeting.  
If it deems it necessary to accomplish its duties, the Committee may request from the Board of Directors the resources to engage external  
consultants.  
A written summary of Committee meetings is drawn up.  
IV. REPORT  
The Committee submits written reports to the Board of Directors regarding its work.  
It periodically evaluates its performance based on these rules of procedure and, if applicable, offers suggestions for improving its performance.  
Members of the Strategic Committee in 2013  
The Strategic Committee is made up of eight members.  
The Committee’s members are Mmes. Barbizet, Kux and Lauvergeon and Messrs. Margerie, Brock, Desmarest, Lamarche and Mandil.  
Mr. de Margerie chairs the Committee.  
Three-fourths of the Committee members are independent directors, given that the Board of Directors considers Mmes. Barbizet, Kux and  
Lauvergeon and Messrs. Brock, Lamarche and Mandil to be independent (see point 1.8. below).  
A summary of the Committee’s activities in 2013 is provided in point 1.6.4. below.  
118  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
1.6. Activity of the Board of Directors and its Committees in 2013  
Directors are generally given written notice during the week prior to  
Board meetings. Whenever possible, documents to be considered  
for decisions to be made at Board meetings are sent with the notice  
of meetings. The minutes of the previous meeting are expressly  
approved at each Board meeting.  
The Compensation Committee held two meetings, with 100%  
attendance.  
The Governance & Ethics Committee held three meetings,  
with 93.3% attendance.  
The Strategic Committee held three meetings, with 91.6%  
attendance.  
The Board of Directors held nine meetings in 2013. The attendance  
rate for all the directors was 88.4%.  
A table summarizing individual attendance at the Board of Directors  
and Committee meetings is provided below.  
The Audit Committee held seven meetings. The attendance rate  
for its members was 95.3%.  
Directors’ attendance at Board and Committees Meetings in 2013  
Directors  
Board of  
Directors  
Audit  
Committee  
Compensation  
Committee  
Governance &  
Ethics  
Strategic  
Committee  
Committee  
Attendance Number Attendance Number Attendance Number Attendance Number Attendance Number  
rate  
of  
rate  
of  
rate  
of  
rate  
of  
rate  
of  
meetings  
meetings  
meetings  
meetings  
meetings  
Christophe de Margerie  
Thierry Desmarest  
Patrick Artus  
Patricia Barbizet  
Gunnar Brock  
Claude Clément(a)  
Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette  
Bertrand Collomb  
Paul Desmarais, jr  
Anne-Marie Idrac  
Charles Keller(b)  
100%  
100%  
77.7%  
100%  
88.9%  
80%  
100%  
66.6%  
55.5%  
100%  
100%  
88.9%  
88.9%  
77.7%  
100%  
88.9%  
88.4%  
9/9  
9/9  
7/9  
9/9  
8/9  
4/5  
9/9  
6/9  
5/9  
9/9  
4/4  
8/9  
8/9  
7/9  
9/9  
8/9  
-
-
-
-
-
-
7/7  
-
-
7/7  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2/2  
2/2  
-
2/2  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2/2  
2/2  
-
-
3/3  
3/3  
-
2/3  
-
-
3/3  
-
-
-
-
-
-
3/3  
-
100%  
66.6%  
66.6%  
100%  
100%  
50%  
100%  
66.6%  
-
100%  
100%  
66.6%  
100%  
100%  
100%  
100%  
91.6%  
3/3  
2/3  
100%  
100%  
100%  
100%  
2/3(c)  
100%  
-
-
3/3  
3/3  
-
-
100%  
66.6%  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1/2(c)  
3/3(c)  
2/3(c)  
-
3/3(c)  
1/1(c)  
2/3  
3/3  
3/3  
3/3  
3/3(c)  
100%  
-
-
-
-
100%  
-
-
-
-
Barbara Kux  
-
Gérard Lamarche  
Anne Lauvergeon  
Claude Mandil  
Michel Pébereau  
Attendance rate  
85.7%  
6/7  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%  
-
100%  
100%  
100%  
95.3%  
93.3%  
(
(
(
a) Director until May 17, 2013.  
b) Director since May 17, 2013.  
c) Voluntary participation (Director not a member of the Strategic Committee).  
Board of Directors’ meetings in 2013  
The meetings included, but were not limited to, a review of the  
following subjects:  
expansion of the existing pipeline between Edmonton (Alberta) and  
Vancouver (west coast of Canada).  
January 16  
February 12  
2013 Budget;  
– 2012 accounts (Consolidated Financial Statements, parent  
company accounts) after the Audit Committee’s report and work  
performed by the statutory auditors;  
– main financial communications, including industrial safety and  
social aspects;  
presentation by the Director of Scientific Research of the Group’s  
R&D activities (expenditures incurred, employees, organization,  
issues and strategic directions according to the business  
segments, environmental challenges);  
summary of the January 16 Strategic Committee meeting; and  
approval of the proposed investment in the Moho North project, a  
field located offshore of the Republic of Congo, in order to continue  
to develop the resources discovered there, with a presentation that  
included environmental information (in particular, no flaring of gas  
under normal conditions and reinjection of production water);  
information on other ongoing projects: development plan  
for the Dagny offshore oil and gas field in the Norwegian North  
Sea, and reservation of oil and gas transport capacity in the  
Transmountain pipeline in Canada in connection with the  
– debate on the Board of Directors’ practices following the formal  
evaluation carried out with the help of an external consultant who  
conducted interviews with each Director based on a detailed  
questionnaire;  
– amendment of the rules of procedure of the Audit Committee  
in order to more precisely formalize the missions and practices  
of the Committee;  
– assessment of the directors’ independence and report on the  
absence of conflicts of interest;  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
119  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
proposal to renew directorships;  
July 25  
opinions on the candidates for the position of Director representing  
employee shareholders whose election will be submitted to the  
Shareholders’ Meeting;  
review of the amount of directors’ fees allocated to directors and  
Committee members and proposed increase in the annual maximum  
amount (decision to be submitted to the Shareholders’ Meeting);  
compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
strategic perspectives of the Refining & Chemicals segment  
including safety aspects and prevention of major environmental  
risks;  
results for the second quarter 2013 and the first half of 2013  
after the Audit Committee’s report and work performed by the  
statutory auditors;  
payment of an interim dividend;  
(without the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer being present);  
presentation of the Company’s equal opportunity and salary  
equality policy and comparative status of overall employment  
and training conditions for women and men in the Company;  
grant of performance shares (without the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer present during the related discussion); and  
information on ongoing investment projects: revision of the  
Surmont 2 (Alberta, Canada) development plan; reservation of  
capacity in the Energy East pipeline project in Canada in order  
to have additional capacities for evacuation of future production  
of Canadian bitumen and export to the Gulf of Mexico;  
proposed investment in the Antwerp platform (Belgium)  
to adapt the production unit to the markets and to improve  
its environmental performance.  
review of the possibility of granting the Company’s performance  
shares and stock options and amendment to the stock options  
and performance shares grant policy;  
Shareholders’ Meeting notice and approval of the documents  
related to this meeting; and  
information on the terms and conditions of sale of Transport et  
Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF), a gas transport and storage  
affiliate in southwestern France.  
March 27  
presentation to the Board of the work of the Audit Committee  
at its meeting on March 25, 2013;  
amendment of the rules of procedure of the Nominating &  
Governance Committee, which is now named the Governance  
and Ethics Committee;  
preparation of the Shareholders’ Meeting: review of various  
chapters of the Registration Document forming the Management  
Report within the meaning of the French Commercial Code  
September 19 – meeting held in Pau  
governance: review of the rules of confidentiality applicable  
to the work of the Board of Directors;  
financial communication at mid-2013: presentation of the outlook  
and objectives for the coming years and of the Group’s social  
and environmental strategy;  
(particularly, risk factors, compensation, legal and arbitration  
proceedings, corporate, environmental and social information);  
review of requests made by the central works council to include  
draft resolutions on the Shareholders’ Meeting agenda;  
information on the proposed sale of TOTAL’s stake in the Voyager  
project (upgrader in the Fort McMurray region of Canada);  
Group financial policy (debt-to-equity ratio, long-term debt rating,  
liquidity, debt policy, financial requirements);  
establishment of the schedule related to the payment of interim  
dividends and the balance of the dividend for 2014; and  
information on the launch of the capital increase reserved for  
employees approved by the Board of Directors on September 18,  
strategic perspectives of the Upstream segment (Exploration  
&
Production) with a presentation of safety indicators and  
environmental objectives; and  
information on the acquisition by QPI (Qatar) of a minority stake  
in Total E&P Congo, in the form of a subscription to this  
subsidiary’s capital increase.  
October 30  
summary of the September 19 Strategic Committee meeting;  
strategic perspectives of Marketing & Services, including  
the operational safety and technological risk aspects, and  
strategic perspectives of New Energies, particularly solar and  
biotechnology;  
2012 with delegation to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
of the power to set the opening date, the subscription period  
and the subscription price of the shares to be issued.  
Group 5-year plan: outlook of the Group and business segments  
and financial summary of the long-term plan;  
results for the third quarter 2013 after the Audit Committee’s  
report and work performed by the Statutory Auditors;  
payment of an interim dividend;  
April 25  
summary of the April 25 Strategic Committee meeting and proposed  
amendment to the rules of procedure of the Strategic Committee;  
results for the first quarter 2013 after the Audit Committee’s  
report and work performed by the statutory auditors;  
payment of an interim dividend; and  
information on the capital increase reserved for employees  
carried out from March 15 to 21, 2013.  
summary of the October 29 Governance & Ethics Committee  
meeting;  
agreement in principle on changing the currency in which the  
Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements are presented from  
the euro to the US Dollar;  
May 17 – pre-shareholders’ meeting  
– approval in preparation for the final investment decision regarding  
the Yamal LNG project (Eastern Siberia north of the polar circle)  
and approval of the development of the Fort Hills project (production  
of oil sands located in the Athabasca Region of Alberta, Canada)  
and of the related evacuation logistics (dedicated pipeline).  
Review of the environmental impact of these projects; and  
review of the draft responses to the written questions submitted  
by shareholders.  
July 8  
information concerning pending legal proceedings and the  
information on obtaining the Libra license in Brazil following a call  
for tenders by the Brazilian authorities, description of the work  
programs, governance rules to be considered, the contractual  
and fiscal framework and the associated risks.  
settlements signed with the US authorities (DoJ and SEC)  
following the investigation conducted by these authorities  
concerning the pursuit of business in Iran, on the one hand,  
and the decision handed down by the Paris Criminal Court  
on July 8, 2013 in the “Oil-for-Food” affair in Iraq, on the other.  
information on the call for tenders launched by the Abu Dhabi  
120  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
state-owned company for the renewal of an ADCO concession  
granted in 1939 to a consortium that included TOTAL, detailed  
information about the proposed tax regime and the Group’s  
interest in remaining in this concession.  
1.6.1. Audit Committee activity  
In 2013, the members of the Audit Committee reviewed the  
following matters:  
– presentation of the risk of non-acceptability of the Group’s  
activities by stakeholders and of the action plans implemented  
within the Group;  
February 8  
presentation of the updated mapping of Exploration-Production  
risks: range of key risks and actions taken for better assessment  
and greater control; and  
review of the accounts for the fourth quarter of 2012, the Group’s  
consolidated results and the statutory accounts of parent company  
TOTAL S.A. for 2012. Presentation by the statutory auditors of a  
summary of their work performed in accordance with French and  
American professional audit standards, in particular on the Group’s  
positions in terms of valuing assets and assessing country risk  
and handling risk and legal proceedings in the financial  
statements and notes;  
– review of the consolidation department’s functions in terms  
of accounting standards and its organization within the Group;  
presentation of recent changes to the IFRS and the main  
proposed changes in standards in progress.  
July 23  
review of the Group’s financial position;  
review of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the second  
quarter and first half of 2013 and of the statutory financial  
statements of TOTAL S.A. Presentation by the statutory auditors  
of a summary of their limited review;  
presentation of the preparation process and key validation stages  
of the Management Report forming Chapter 3 of the Registration  
Document;  
presentation of the 2012 highlights, the conclusions of the audits  
conducted in 2012 and the objectives of the audit plan proposed  
for 2013. Comments on the results of the assessment of internal  
control on financial reporting conducted for fiscal year 2012 as part  
of the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, along with a  
summary of the statutory auditors’ assessments of internal control  
related to financial reporting as part of the SOX 404 process;  
– presentation of the Group’s financial position at the end of the  
quarter; and  
update on the internal audits conducted in the second quarter  
of 2013.  
October 9  
review of the risk mapping process resumed and consolidated  
at the time of the creation of the Refining & Chemicals segment;  
review of the draft of the Chairman’s report on internal control  
and risk management procedures;  
review of significant litigation and status update on the main  
pending proceedings involving the Group;  
adoption of the proposed amendments to the rules of procedure  
of the Audit Committee following requests made by the AMF; and  
statutory auditors’ analysis of the challenges facing the Group  
related to the 2013 economic environment and specific  
important points noted with respect to their 2013 audit plan;  
review of a director’s specific request to use the services of an  
audit firm, other than the statutory auditors, on a personal basis.  
March 25  
– review of the rules for pre-approval of audit and non-audit services  
and approval, without changes to the policy implemented;  
presentation of certain parts of the Registration Document:  
risk factors and legal proceedings;  
– update on the statutory auditors’ fees; and  
review of the hydrocarbon reserves evaluation process at year-  
end 2012; and  
– the members of the Committee then met with the statutory  
auditors without management being present.  
presentation of the Group’s insurance policy: coverage for 2013  
against property damage, business interruption and civil liability.  
Update on the main pending claims.  
October 28  
review of the consolidated and statutory financial statements of  
TOTAL S.A. for the third quarter and first nine months of 2013.  
Presentation by the statutory auditors of a summary of their  
limited review;  
April 23  
review of the consolidated and statutory financial statements  
of TOTAL S.A. for the first quarter of 2013, with a presentation  
by the statutory auditors of a summary of their limited review;  
– presentation of the Group ’s financial position at the end of the quarter;  
update on the internal audits conducted in the third quarter of 2013;  
presentation of the Group’s financial position at the end of the  
quarter; and  
the Committee was informed that the relevant employees acted  
in compliance with the provisions of the Financial Code of Ethics;  
update on the internal audits conducted in the first quarter of 2013.  
update on the changes to the internal control framework  
adopted by the Group (COSO) with the publication of a new  
framework (COSO 2013), which is fully applicable at year-end  
June 12  
presentation of the topics covered by the Group Risk Committee  
2014. Presentation of the roadmap for adapting the Group’s  
in 2012: risks related to information management; risks related  
to “emerging” partners; risks of industrial accidents and pollution;  
mapping of legal risks. At the beginning of 2013, the topics  
discussed included risks of non-acceptability and risks related  
to reorganizations of industrial sites in Europe.  
system accordingly;  
– presentation of the operation of the SunPower Audit Committee  
in accordance with NASDAQ and Sarbanes-Oxley rules;  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
121  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
update on compliance: organization and progress made  
in implementing the program. Presentation of specific important  
points;  
Department which was presented at each committee meeting  
where the quarterly financial statements were reviewed.  
The Audit Committee reviewed the accounts within the time limits  
required by the AFEP-MEDEF Code, namely two days prior to their  
review by the Board of Directors.  
presentation of the proposal to publish the Consolidated  
Financial Statements in USD as of January 1, 2014; and  
review of the limit on the statutory auditors’ non-audit services  
for 2014.  
The statutory auditors attended all Audit Committee meetings  
held in 2013.  
At each meeting related to the quarterly financial statements, the  
Committee reviewed the Group’s financial position in terms of liquidity,  
cash flow and debt, as well as its significant risks and off-balance  
sheet commitments. The Audit Committee was periodically  
informed of the risk management processes implemented within  
the Group and the work carried out by the Internal Audit  
The Chief Financial Officer, the Vice President Accounting,  
the Vice President Internal Control and Audit and the Treasurer  
attended all the Audit Committee meetings.  
The Chairman of the Committee reported to the Board of Directors  
on the Committee’s activities.  
1.6.2. Compensation Committee activity  
February 11  
– information regarding the compensation policy for the members  
of the Executive Committee;  
review of the proposed amendments to the performance shares  
and stock options grant policy and approval of the proposed text  
to be included in the 2012 Registration Document;  
– for the parts within its remit, provision of the information and  
reports that must be sent to shareholders by the Board of  
Directors or its Chairman.  
proposed compensation for the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer (variable portion for his duties in 2012) and proposed  
changes in the criteria used to determine his personal contribution  
to the variable portion for 2013. Review of AMF recommendation  
No. 2012-02;  
July 24  
proposals regarding the 2013 performance shares grant plan:  
number of recipients, length of the vesting (raised from two to  
three years) and holding period, performance conditions for final  
grant. Proposals regarding the grant of performance shares to  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
review of compliance with the restrictions on share transfers by  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;  
1.6.3. Governance & Ethics Committee activity  
February 11  
to propose that the amount of the limit allocated by the 2007  
Shareholders’ Meeting be raised from 1.1 million to 1.4 million  
due to the increase in the number of Board and Committee  
meetings; and  
results of the formal self-assessment of the Board’s work conducted  
by an external firm in the form of interviews with each Director  
based on a questionnaire provided to the Board in advance. The  
Committee expressed its support for the suggested improvements,  
which mainly entail increasing the number of Strategic Committee  
meetings and holding a Board meeting at an industrial site;  
– review, for the parts within its remit, of the reports that must be  
sent to shareholders by the Board of Directors or its Chairman.  
July 24  
proposed amendment of the rules of procedure of the Audit  
Committee in order to better formalize this Committee’s practices  
and missions;  
presentation by the Chairman of the Ethics Committee of a  
review of the ethics program for 2012 (information campaigns,  
changes in the matters and cases reviewed, ethical assessments  
conducted at the Group’s entities, actions related to human  
rights) and presentation of the priorities for 2013;  
proposals to the Board of Directors regarding the assessment of  
the independence of the directors based on the independence  
criteria specified in the AFEP-MEDEF Code and after reviewing the  
level of activity between certain directors and the Group’s suppliers;  
information about the agreements signed with the US authorities  
(DoJ and SEC) as part of an investigation regarding the pursuit of  
information regarding the absence of potential conflicts of interest  
between the Company and the private interests of its directors;  
business in Iran;  
discussion about changes in the composition of the Board to be  
anticipated for 2014 following the enactment of the Law 2013-504  
of June 14, 2013 on employment stability, which establishes  
the presence of employee directors on Boards of Directors,  
and study of a scheme to limit the total number of directors as  
suggested during the last assessment of the Board’s practices;  
proposals to the Board of Directors regarding the list of directors  
to be recommended for appointment by the 2013 Shareholders’  
Meeting;  
in accordance with the provisions of the bylaws, review of the  
candidacies of employees who will be proposed as representatives  
of employee shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting and  
opinions on these candidacies;  
– information about possible changes to the composition  
of the Executive Committee;  
review of the terms and conditions for allocating directors’ fees  
to directors and Committees’ members. The Committee decided  
– update on the Company’s positioning with respect to the new  
provisions of the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
122  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
October 29  
– proposed amendment to the Company’s bylaws to be submitted  
to the Board of Directors regarding the addition of provisions  
related to the appointment of employee directors and adaptation  
of the provisions related to age limits for the Chairman of the  
Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer; and  
continuation of the study on the size of the Board of Directors  
and proposal to move towards a smaller Board that could  
include twelve directors (excluding a director representing  
employee shareholders and employee director);  
information on the appointment of the new President of  
Exploration & Production as of January 1, 2014.  
1.6.4. Strategic Committee activity  
January 16  
2035 and review of scenarios concerning the place of coal, oil,  
gas and renewable energies (wind power, biomass, solar).  
presentation by the Vice President, Strategy & Business  
Intelligence of the strategies of leading national and international  
oil companies in the fields of exploration/production, refining/  
chemicals and marketing/services.  
September 19  
continuation of the discussion on energy transition, with  
presentations by the Vice President, Sustainable Development  
and Environment and the Scientific Director regarding,  
April 25  
in particular, the constraints related to CO emissions.  
2
presentation by the Vice President, Strategy and Business  
Intelligence of the Group’s vision regarding the energy mix in  
1.7. Board of Directors practices  
1.7.1. Management form  
On May 21, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to reunify the  
positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and appoint the  
Chief Executive Officer as Chairman of the Board. This decision was  
made further to the work done by the Governance & Ethics Committee  
guarantees required to implement best governance practices within  
a unified management framework. In particular, the bylaws allow  
the Board to nominate one or two Vice-Chairmen. They also state  
that the Board of Directors can be summoned by any means, even  
verbally, or at short notice in the event of an emergency, by the  
Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, or one-third of the members, at any  
time and whenever the Company’s interest so requires. The rules of  
procedure of the Board of Directors also state that each director is  
required to inform the Board of Directors of any conflicts of interest,  
actual or potential, with the Company or with any other company in  
the Group, and to abstain from voting on the resolution in question,  
and even to refrain from taking part in the debate preceding the vote.  
(then the Nominating & Governance Committee) and in the best  
interests of the Company, taking into account the advantage of the  
unified management and the majority of independent directors  
appointed at the Committees, which ensures balanced authority.  
The Board of Directors deemed that the unified management form  
was the most appropriate to the Group’s organization, modus  
operandi and business, and the specificities of the oil and gas  
sector. It respects the respective prerogatives of the various  
Company corporate bodies (Shareholders’ Meeting, Board  
of Directors, general management).  
In addition, the current composition of the Board of Directors and  
its Committees ensures a balance of power within the Company’s  
bodies given the high proportion of independent directors serving  
on the Board and Committees (see point 1.8. below), the full  
involvement of the directors in the activity of the Board and its  
Committees (see point 1.6. above), and the diversity of their  
profiles, skills and expertise (see point 1.1. above).  
It was confirmed during the Board of Directors’ meeting held  
on May 11, 2012, at which Mr. Christophe de Margerie was  
reappointed as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
Moreover, the Company bylaws and the respective rules of  
procedure of the Board of Directors and its Committees provide the  
1.7.2. Performance and evaluation  
At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors  
discussed its practices on the basis of a formal evaluation  
organized by an external consultant. This evaluation was carried  
out in the form of interviews conducted by the external consultant  
with each Director based on a detailed questionnaire.  
guidelines, which mainly entail increasing the number of Strategic  
Committee meetings and holding a Board meeting at an industrial site.  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors  
discussed its practices on the basis of a formal evaluation carried  
out by means of a detailed questionnaire to which all the Directors  
responded. The responses given by the Directors were then  
presented to the Governance & Ethics Committee for review and  
summarized. This summary was then discussed by the Board of  
Directors. This process made it possible to confirm each director’s  
good contribution to the work of the Board and its Committees.  
The evaluation showed that the Directors were satisfied with the  
workings of the Board of Directors and its Committees and that the  
Directors noted an improvement. Suggestions for progress were  
made in the conclusions of the report. At the recommendation of  
the Governance & Ethics Committee (then Nominating & Governance  
Committee), the Board of Directors approved the proposed  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
123  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
The formal evaluation showed a generally positive opinion of the  
practices of the Board of Directors and the Committees, which  
highlighted that the improvements requested by the directors in 2013  
had been generally made. To continue the improvement of its  
functioning, the Board took into account the main suggestions  
made by the Directors in the 2014 self-assesment, which mainly  
concerned a review at the outset of the meeting of the major  
points (e.g., financial statements, large-scale investments and  
divestments projects) and a presentation of new topics at the  
meetings of the Strategic Committee (e.g., monitoring of significant  
development projects, analysis of major risks that may affect the  
strategy of the Group).  
1.8. Director independence  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, on the  
recommendation of the Governance & Ethics Committee, reviewed  
the independence of the Company’s directors as of December 31,  
of the Governance & Ethics Committee, observed that four directors  
had exceeded twelve years of service on December 31, 2013:  
Ms. Lauvergeon and Messrs. Collomb, Desmarest and Pébereau.  
It also observed that Mr. Desmarais, jr’s years of service as director  
will reach twelve prior to the date of the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’  
Meeting.  
2013. At the Committee’s suggestion, the Board considered that,  
pursuant to the AFEP-MEDEF Code, a director is independent  
when “he or she has no relationship of any kind with the Company,  
its Group or its Management, that may compromise the exercise  
of his or her freedom of judgment”.  
In assessing the independence of these directors, the Board  
disregarded this criterion applicable to twelve years of service  
based on the opinion that it had no relevance given, on the one  
hand, the specific characteristics of the oil and gas sector which  
relies on long-term investment cycles, and, on the other hand,  
the objectivity that these directors have demonstrated in the  
Board’s activity. In addition, it deemed that the experience acquired  
on the Board by these directors strengthened their freedom of  
speech and their independence of judgment and, therefore,  
benefited the Group. The Board also noted that the criterion related  
to the length of term of office was not one of the independence  
criteria required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).  
For each director, this assessment relies on the independence  
criteria set forth in the AFEP-MEDEF Code, revised in June 2013,  
as outlined below:  
not be an employee or executive director of the Company, or an  
employee or director of its parent company or of a company  
consolidated by its parent company, and not having been in such  
a position for the previous five years;  
not be an executive director of a company in which the Company  
holds, directly or indirectly, a directorship or in which an employee  
designated as such or an executive director of the Company  
Accordingly, the Board held that Mr. Collomb, Mr. Desmarais, jr,  
Ms. Lauvergeon and Mr. Pébereau could be deemed as being  
independent.  
(
currently in office or having held such office for less than five  
years) is a director;  
not to be a material customer, supplier, investment banker or  
commercial banker of the Company or Group, and for which the  
Company or the Group represents a material part of their business  
Concerning “material” relationships, as a customer, supplier, investment  
banker or finance banker, between a director and the Company, the  
Board deemed that the level of activity between Group companies  
and a bank at which Mr. Pébereau is a former corporate executive  
director, which is less than 0.1% of its net banking income (1) and  
less than 5% of the Group’s overall assets, represents neither a  
material portion of the overall activity of such bank nor a material  
portion of the Group’s external financing. The Board concluded that  
Mr. Pébereau could be deemed as being independent.  
(the assessment of the materiality or non-materiality of the  
relationship must be discussed by the Board and the criteria on  
which this assessment was based must be explained in the  
Registration Document);  
not to be related by close family ties to a corporate executive  
director;  
not to have been a statutory auditor of the Company within the  
previous five years;  
Likewise, the Board of Directors also deemed that the level  
of activity between Group companies and one of its suppliers,  
Vallourec, of which Ms. Idrac is a member of the Supervisory  
Board, which is less than 3.3% of Vallourec’s turnover (2) and less  
than 0.5% of the Group’s purchasing in 2013, represents neither  
a material portion of the supplier’s overall activity nor a material  
portion of the Group’s purchasing. The Board concluded that  
Ms. Idrac could be deemed as being independent.  
not to have been a director of the Company for more than twelve  
years (upon expiry of the term of office during which the 12-year  
limit was reached).  
The AFEP-MEDEF Code expressly stipulates that the Board can decide  
that the implementation of certain defined criteria is not relevant or  
induces an interpretation that is particular to the Company.  
Furthermore, the Board deemed that the level of activity between  
Group companies and Stena AB of which Mr. Brock is a director,  
was nil in 2013. The Board concluded that Mr. Brock could be  
deemed as being independent.  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, pursuant to the report of the  
Governance & Ethics Committee, the Board of Directors observed  
that Mr. Desmarest, Chairman of the Board of Directors until May  
2
1, 2010, had been an executive director within the meaning of the  
Mmes. Barbizet, Coisne-Roquette, Idrac, Kux and Lauvergeon,  
and Messrs. Artus, Brock, Collomb, Desmarais, Lamarche, Mandil  
and Pébereau were deemed to be independent directors.  
Code within the five previous years.  
With regard to the criterion applicable to twelve years of service, the  
Board, at its meeting on February 11, 2014, pursuant to the report  
8
5% (3) of the directors were independent on December 31, 2013.  
(
(
(
1) 2013 net banking income estimated based on BNP Paribas as of September 30, 2013.  
2) Based on the 2012 consolidated turnover published by Vallourec.  
3) Not including the director representing employee shareholders, according to the recommendations made in the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
124  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
1.9. Additional information on the members of the Board of Directors  
1.9.1. Absence of conflicts of interest  
1.9.2. Absence of a conviction  
The Board also noted the absence of potential conflicts between  
the Directors’ duties in the best interests of the Company and the  
private interests of its directors. To the Company’s knowledge, the  
members of the Board of TOTAL S.A. are not related by close family  
ties, there are no arrangements or agreements with clients or suppliers  
that facilitated their appointment, and there is no service agreement  
binding a director of TOTAL S.A. to one of its subsidiaries and  
providing for special benefits upon termination of such agreement.  
The current members of the Board of Directors of the Company  
have informed the Company that they have not been convicted,  
have not been associated with a bankruptcy, receivership or  
liquidation, and have not been incriminated or publicly sanctioned  
or disqualified, as stipulated in item 14.1 of Annex I of EC  
Regulation 809/2004 of April 29, 2004.  
1.10. Internal control and risk management  
General Management constantly strives to maintain an efficient  
internal control system, based on clear organizational principles,  
an effective system to identify and manage risks and suitable  
governance instances and control activities. The internal control  
framework adopted by the Group is that of the Committee of  
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO,  
aim to adapt this manual to their own area in accordance with the  
principle of subsidiarity applicable within the Group.  
The Group is structured around three business segments  
(Upstream, Refining & Chemicals, Marketing & Services) to which  
the Group’s business units report. The business segment managers  
are responsible, within their area of responsibility, for ensuring that  
operations are carried out in accordance with the strategic objectives  
defined by the Board of Directors and General Management.  
1992). In this framework, internal control is a process intended to  
provide reasonable assurance that the following will be achieved:  
effective and efficient execution of operations, accurate reporting  
of financial and accounting information, compliance with applicable  
laws and regulations, and protection of assets. As for any system  
of internal control, there can be no guarantee that all risks are  
completely managed or eliminated. The COSO framework, the  
application of which relates to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley  
Act (SOA 404), is considered equivalent to the reference framework  
of the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés  
financiers or AMF).  
The functional divisions of the Holding company help General  
Management define and oversee the norms and standards and monitor  
activities. They also lend their expertise to the operational divisions.  
The functional divisions include, in particular, the Finance  
Department (to which the Group Risk Management and Insurance  
Department and the Group Information Technology and  
Telecommunications Department report), the Legal Department  
and Corporate Affairs (to which the following Departments report:  
Corporate Internal Control and Audit, Sustainable Development  
and Environment, Human Resources, Security, Industrial Safety).  
Moreover, the Group is exploring ways in which to adapt its internal  
control system to the 2013 COSO framework, which will replace  
the 1992 COSO framework as of December 15, 2014.  
In line with previous action taken in the area of internal control and  
risk management, General Management formalized in 2012 a Risk  
Management, Internal Control and Audit charter, which forms the  
common framework within which the Group manages its activities.  
In terms of risk management, the Group draws on the principal  
international (COSO and ISO 31000: 2009) and French standards  
(reference framework of the French Financial Markets Authority).  
The Group’s internal control and risk management system is  
organized around three operational levels: Group, business  
segments and entities. Each level is directly involved in and  
responsible for designing and implementing internal control, in line  
with the degree of centralization targeted by General Management.  
The Group’s internal control system covers the processes of the fully  
consolidated subsidiaries. The study regarding the implementation  
of a more structured internal control system at the equity affiliates  
continued in 2013. The implementation of an internal control system  
adapted to the equity affiliates is expected to begin in 2014 at the  
most significant entities.  
At each of the three levels, specific internal control procedures  
cover organization, delegations of authority and employee  
education and training that conform to the Group’s overall  
framework. The Group has implemented a shared database of its  
key documents (REFLEX), which contains the various standards  
Under these internal control principles, which are part of the  
corporate governance organization, the Audit Committee is  
responsible for monitoring the efficiency of internal control and risk  
management procedures, assisted by the Group Internal Control  
and Audit Department and the internal control teams from the  
business segments. These rules are designed to allow the Board of  
Directors to ensure that internal control is effective and that published  
information available to shareholders and financial markets is reliable.  
(charters, policies, directives and rules), as well as a set of guides  
and manuals. A set of governance principles have been designed in  
addition to REFLEX standards describing, in particular, ways to  
ensure their adoption by the business segments. The Group is also  
in the process of formalizing an internal control manual, containing  
a risk analysis and a library of standard associated controls for each  
of the main cross-functional processes. The business segments will  
The Group’s internal control and risk management system is based on  
the five factors below, which are derived from the COSO framework.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
125  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
1
.10.1. Control environment  
about the Group. These ethical rules require, in particular, that  
permanent insiders refrain from carrying out any transactions,  
including hedging transactions, in TOTAL shares or ADRs and  
in shares in collective investment plans (FCPE) invested primarily  
in TOTAL shares (as well as derivatives related to such shares)  
on the day on which the Company discloses its periodic earnings  
(quarterly, interim and annual) and during the thirty calendar days  
preceding such date.  
The control environment is based on the Group’s core values  
that are deeply rooted in its culture, including the integrity, ethical  
conduct and professional competence of its employees.  
The Group’s values and business principles are set out in the Code  
of Conduct and the Ethics Charter, circulated to employees and  
available on the Group’s Internet site, and in the Financial Code  
of Ethics which, referring to the Group’s Code of Conduct,  
sets forth specific rules for its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,  
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and the financial  
and accounting managers of its principal activities.  
The Group’s senior management receives regular training  
on the content and the importance of the rules of behavior set out  
in the Code of Conduct.  
In this regard, in order to prevent conflicts of interest and at the  
initiative of the Ethics Department, each of the Group’s executive  
officers completes an annual declaration regarding any conflicts  
of interest to which he or she may be subject. By completing this  
declaration, each executive officer also agrees to report to the  
Ethics Committee or to his or her supervisor any conflict of interest  
that he or she has had or of which he or she is aware in performing  
his or her duties.  
These values and principles are also cascaded in codes,  
procedures and guidelines governing the significant processes of  
the business segments or the Group. These codes explain the  
Group’s values and describe its business and behavior principles  
with regard to employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers  
and competitors. They also set out the rules of individual behavior  
applicable to all employees and expected in host countries.  
More specifically, the Group has been deploying ethics and compliance  
programs since 2009, as a priority defined by General Management.  
Each year, the entities’ general managers and financial managers  
provide internal written representations to the Chief Executive  
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that they have complied with  
internal control procedures and that the financial reporting under  
their responsibility is reliable.  
This is why, at the end of 2009, the Executive Committee formally  
approved a compliance policy and program designed to prevent  
corruption.  
At that time, the Group reaffirmed the zero tolerance principle as it  
relates to corruption and, since 2011, has defined and published  
a series of internal standards. These specific standards, which take  
into account relevant applicable laws, cover various areas where  
particular risks of exposure to corruption may exist (e.g., business  
partnerships, representatives, procurement and sales, gifts, etc.)  
and are based on a due diligence process for detecting and  
addressing them at an early stage.  
Since 2002, over 100 ethical assessments of the Group’s entities  
have been conducted by GoodCorporation, an organization  
specializing in ethical assessments of companies. This process  
is based on a questionnaire consisting of 87 indicators derived  
from the Group’s Code of Conduct. GoodCorporation uses this  
questionnaire to assess on site the systems implemented by the  
relevant Group companies (covering various ethics-related issues  
such as human rights, respect for individuals, integrity, etc.) and  
conducts interviews, on condition of anonymity, of employees,  
suppliers, customers, industrial partners, representatives of local  
authorities and other stakeholders to gather their opinions as to  
how well these systems function. Following these assessments,  
GoodCorporation drafts a report for the management of the  
relevant Group company. An action plan is then defined by the  
subsidiary and its implementation is monitored. These ethical  
assessments are a means of continuously improving the Group’s  
policies and procedures by, among other things, identifying  
best practices.  
To support the launch of this program:  
an e-learning module has been designed in twelve languages.  
As of the end of December 2013, more than 45,000 employees  
had followed this module;  
over 350 Compliance Officers have been appointed and trained  
at the business segments, subsidiaries and entities. Their role  
is to ensure that the program is implemented at the local level.  
The Group has also issued guidelines in order to consolidate its  
policies designed to prevent and respond to instances of fraud  
of any type. These guidelines supplement and clarify the rules  
of ethical behavior applicable to all the Group’s employees.  
Finally, under the settlements reached in 2013 between TOTAL,  
the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) (see chapter 4,  
point 4), an independent monitor was appointed to conduct a  
three-year review of the anti-corruption compliance and related  
internal control procedures implemented by the Group and to  
recommend improvements, when necessary. The monitor’s mission  
started on December 2, 2013. The resources needed to complete  
his mission under the best conditions are being made available.  
In the same way as efforts to prevent corruption are organized, a  
network of Fraud Risk Coordinators has been set up to implement  
this program.  
A Group policy aimed at ensuring compliance with competition law  
and preventing violations in this area was also adopted as a follow-  
up to the various measures previously implemented by the business  
segments. Its deployment is based, in particular, on the involvement  
of hierarchies and staff, training courses that include an e-learning  
module and an organization responsible for implementing the program.  
1.10.2. Risk identification, assessment  
and management  
The Executive Committee is responsible for analyzing the internal  
and external risks that could impact TOTAL’s performance, with the  
assistance of the Group Risk Committee and the internal control  
and internal audit functions.  
The Group’s Ethics Department implements a policy to prevent  
insider trading on the financial markets which is based, in particular,  
on the Group’s internal ethical rules. These rules are updated  
on a regular basis and widely distributed to employees who are  
permanently or occasionally in possession of insider knowledge  
Set up in April 2011, the Group Risk Committee (GRC) organizes  
and oversees the global risk management system.  
126  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
The GRC reports to the Executive Committee and is made up of  
managers from the central functional divisions and the senior vice  
president corporate affairs or chief financial officers of the business  
segments. It meets at least six times a year. Its two main functions  
are to identify risks that could prevent the Group from achieving  
its objectives and to ensure the existence and effectiveness  
of risk management systems adapted to the Group’s needs.  
and mobilizes additional resources to assist the local crisis unit,  
when necessary.  
These two units coordinate their actions closely.  
This process was fully implemented in the spring of 2012 following  
the accidents in the North Sea (Elgin platform) and in Nigeria (Ibewa).  
The “Risk Factors” section of this Registration Document (Chapter 4)  
contains a formal and extensive description of the principal risks  
faced by the Group and how the Group manages these risks and  
secures appropriate insurance coverage.  
The GRC relies on the work done by the business segments and  
the functional divisions, which draw up their risk maps and regularly  
report to the Audit Committee on their state of progress.  
The entities are responsible for implementing a risk management  
policy best suited to their specific activities. However, today  
the handling of certain inter-departmental risks is more closely  
coordinated by the respective functional divisions.  
1.10.3. Control activities  
Control activities and financial reporting systems are designed to take  
into account the specific nature of these risks and the degree to which  
operational control is delegated to the business segments and entities.  
The principal risks monitored at Group level are: sensitivity to  
the oil market environment (oil prices and refining, marketing and  
petrochemical margins); exposure to oil and gas trading risks;  
financial markets risks (foreign exchange risk, particularly related  
to the US Dollar, and interest rates); political and legal risks related  
to the operating and contractual environment of the Exploration  
General Management exercises operational control over TOTAL’s  
activities through the Executive Committee’s approval of  
investments and commitments for projects, based on defined  
thresholds. These projects are subject to prior vetting by the Risk  
Committee (CORISK), whose assessments are transmitted  
to the Executive Committee. As part of this review, the CORISK  
verifies the analysis of the various project-related risks.  
&
Production activities; and industrial and environmental risks  
related to the sectors in which the Group is active.  
With regard to risks connected to the trading of oil and gas and  
related financial instruments, the departments concerned, whose  
activity is governed by limits set by the Executive Committee,  
measure their positions and exposure daily and analyze their  
market risk, in particular using value-at-risk assessment methods.  
Control activities are primarily based on a strategic plan that is  
reviewed annually, an annual budget, monthly management  
financial reports with detailed analysis of differences between actual  
and budgeted expenditures, and a reconciliation between quarterly  
published Consolidated Financial Statements and reporting. These  
processes are supervised by the Accounting and Budget/Financial  
Control Departments, which are part of the Finance Department,  
and are performed in compliance with financial reporting standards,  
consistent and compliant with the accounting standards used  
for the published financial statements. Financial indicators  
With regard to counterparty risks, credit limits and risk analysis  
processes are set and updated regularly, for each activity.  
The broad range of activities and countries in which the Group  
operates requires local analysis, by business segment, of the  
related legal, contractual and political risks. Compliance programs  
with regard to competition and bribery law matters are implemented  
by the Group to ensure compliance with applicable legislation.  
and the accounting methods used allow appropriate assessment  
of risks and return on average capital employed (ROACE).  
Moreover, the Group’s Accounting Department draws up a  
quarterly report of consolidated off-balance sheet commitments as  
part of the closure of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The  
financial reporting manual contains a procedure to identify and  
escalate off-balance sheet commitments.  
Operating entities are responsible for assessing their industrial  
and environmental risks and for implementing the regulatory  
requirements of the countries where they operate, as well as any  
relevant guidelines and recommendations defined at the Group or  
business segment level. They are also responsible for actively  
monitoring changes in legislation in order to comply with local and  
international standards concerning industrial and environmental  
risk assessment and management. Risk assessments lead to the  
establishment of management measures to prevent and reduce  
environmental impact, minimize the risks of accidents and contain  
their consequences.  
The Group’s Accounting Department centralizes the interpretation  
of accounting standards applicable to the Group’s Consolidated  
Financial Statements and distributes these standards through  
formal procedures and a financial reporting manual. It monitors the  
effective implementation of standards across TOTAL through  
periodic, formal communication with functional managers in the  
business segments. The Department also periodically reports any  
exceptions to the Chief Financial Officer.  
The Group also has a crisis management process which relies on  
a permanent on-call system, regular exercises conducted at the  
industrial sites of the fully consolidated subsidiaries, a benchmark  
of the best practices of international companies, training courses  
in crisis management and communication, as well as procedures,  
emergency booklets and tools that can be used in the event of a crisis.  
The Treasury Department monitors and manages risks related to  
cash management activities and interest rate-related and foreign  
exchange-related financial instruments in accordance with strict  
rules defined by General Management. Cash and cash equivalents,  
financial positions and financial instruments are centralized by the  
Treasury Department.  
The organization set up in the event of a crisis is deployed at two levels:  
at the local level (country, site or entities), a crisis unit is responsible  
for ensuring operational management and implementing the  
emergency plans; and  
Oil and gas reserves are reviewed by a committee of experts (the  
Reserves Committee), approved by the Exploration & Production  
division’s senior management and then confirmed by the Group’s  
General Management.  
at the head office level, a crisis unit made up of a multi-disciplinary  
team is tasked with assessing the situation and overseeing crisis  
management. This central unit provides the necessary expertise  
The Disclosure Committee, whose members are the managers  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
127  
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
of the main corporate departments, establishes and maintains  
procedures designed to ensure the quality and accuracy of external  
communications intended for financial markets.  
guidelines and recommendations covering safety and security  
(both industrial and information technology), health, the environment  
and sustainable development.  
At the business segments and entity levels, control activities are  
organized around the principal operational processes: exploration  
and reserves, purchasing, capital expenditures, production, sales,  
oil, gas and petroleum product trading, inventories, human resources,  
financing and cash management, as well as the account closure  
process including in particular control of amortization, depreciation,  
provisions and identification of off-balance sheet commitments.  
The procedures for the business segments primarily concern  
financial control specific to each business. At the entity level,  
the principles of the Group’s overall framework are implemented  
through specific procedures tailored to the size and environment  
of operations.  
1.10.5. Monitoring  
The Group has implemented a range of procedures and programs  
that help to prevent, detect and limit different types of fraud. This  
effort is supported by the business principles and rules of individual  
behavior described in the Code of Conduct and in the codes,  
charters and other standards issued at the Group business segment  
level. The Group has also issued “Guidelines” for handling incidents  
of fraud which have been widely distributed to employees. These  
guidelines create a whistleblowing system which employees can  
use to report circumstances that might amount to fraud. In addition,  
a specific process is in place for reporting irregularities related to  
accounting, internal control and auditing matters. This warning  
process, implemented at the request of the Audit Committee, is  
monitored by this committee and may be used by shareholders,  
employees and third parties.  
Together, the Holding company, the business segments and the  
entities are responsible for monitoring internal control in their  
respective operations.  
Internal Control and Group Audit are the two components of the  
Internal Control and Group Audit Department, which reports to the  
Executive Committee through the Chief Administrative Officer.  
The Group Internal Control Department is tasked with managing  
the Group’s internal control, and in particular:  
– organizing and maintaining the global internal control system,  
ensuring that it is distributed and adopted throughout the Group  
and that it is continuously improved;  
making sure that the Group complies with regulations applying  
to the internal control of financial information, and in particular  
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the law on Financial Security; and  
The Company also has a Financial Code of Ethics which the Audit  
Committee ensures is implemented and observed. This Code  
makes reference to the Group’s Code of Conduct and sets forth  
specific rules for its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief  
Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and the financial and  
accounting managers of its principal activities. In 2012, this Code  
was updated to reflect the new organization of the Group’s  
activities. The changes were approved by the Audit Committee  
at its meeting held on October 26, 2012.  
coordinating the Group-wide risk management measures, and,  
in particular, contributing to all the integrity policy initiatives.  
The central Group Audit function is mainly responsible for auditing  
the internal control system. An audit work schedule is set annually.  
The audit reports are periodically summarized and presented to the  
Audit Committee and, thereby, to the Board of Directors.  
The Information Technology and Telecommunications Department  
has developed and distributed governance and security rules that  
describe the recommended infrastructure, organization and  
procedures to maintain information systems that are appropriate  
to the organization’s needs and to limit information security risks.  
These rules are implemented across the Group under the  
responsibility of the various business segments.  
In 2013, the Group Internal Control and Audit Department’s 80  
auditors conducted more than 170 audits. The Vice President of  
Group Internal Control and Audit attended all Audit Committee  
meetings and reported quarterly on Group Audit activity and  
annually on the conclusions of Internal Control activity.  
The Group’s General Management is responsible for implementing  
and assessing internal control over financial reporting. In this context,  
TOTAL evaluated awareness and implementation of its internal  
control system, based on the COSO framework, in its main entities.  
Control activities to prevent industrial and environmental risks are  
implemented in the business units. External certification or third-  
party audits are conducted for some of the management systems  
related to this type of risk. More detailed information on the Group’s  
safety and environmental initiatives is provided in the Group’s CSR  
With the assistance of its main entities and the Group Internal  
Control and Audit Department, the Group also examined and  
assessed the design and effectiveness of the key operational,  
information systems and financial controls related to internal control  
over financial reporting in financial year 2013 pursuant to section  
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The system used is based on the  
following categorization:  
(Corporate Social Responsibility) report.  
1.10.4. Information and communication  
Internal control procedures are defined at each of the three  
operational levels: general rules at the corporate level; sector-  
specific procedures at the business line level; and others at the  
entity level. These procedures are circulated in memoranda and are  
also available on the intranet sites of the Group and the business  
segments whenever they are common.  
– significant entities assess their key operational controls based on  
their significant processes and respond to a Group questionnaire  
for assessing the internal control system; and  
other less significant entities respond only to the Group  
questionnaire for assessing the internal control system.  
The principal procedures regarding financial controls established  
at the corporate level cover acquisitions and disposals, capital  
expenditure, financing and cash management, budget control  
and financial reporting. Disclosure controls and procedures are in  
place. At the operating levels, they mainly consist of procedures,  
These two categories of entities account for approximately 80%  
of the financial items in the Group’s financial statements. The system  
covers all processes that directly or indirectly contribute to the reliability  
of financial reporting.  
128  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
5
Based on these internal reviews, General Management  
has reasonable assurance of the effectiveness of the Group’s  
internal control.  
The statutory auditors perform those internal control audits that  
they deem necessary as part of their mission to certify the financial  
statements and present their observations to the Audit Committee.  
If points of progress are identified by these internal audits and  
operational checks, then corrective action plans are drawn up  
and closely monitored by the operatives and the Group Internal  
Control and Audit Department.  
For 2013, the statutory auditors reviewed the implementation of the  
Group’s internal control framework and the design and effectiveness  
of key internal controls at its main entities concerning financial  
reporting. Based on the work performed, the statutory auditors  
declared that they had no comments on the information and  
conclusions related to this subject presented in this report.  
1.11. Particular conditions regarding participation in Shareholders’ Meetings  
Shareholders’ Meetings are convened and deliberate under the  
conditions provided by law. However, pursuant to Article 18 of the  
Company’s bylaws, double voting rights are granted to all the  
shares held in the name of the same shareholder for at least two  
years. This same article also provides that no shareholder may cast  
a vote at a Shareholders’ Meeting, either by himself or through an  
agent, representing more than 10% of the total voting rights  
attached to the Company’s shares. This limit applies to the  
aggregated amount of voting rights held directly, indirectly or  
through voting proxies. However, in the case of double voting  
rights, this limit may be extended to 20%.  
For more detailed information on these conditions, see Chapter 9,  
point 2.6. of this Registration Document.  
1.12. Information mentioned in Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code  
In accordance with Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial  
Code, information relating to factors likely to have an impact in the  
event of a public offering is provided below.  
 Agreements between shareholders which the Company  
is aware of and which could result in restrictions  
on the transfer of shares and exercise of voting rights  
Structure of the share capital and direct or indirect interests  
which the Company is aware of pursuant to Articles L. 233-7  
and L. 233-12 of the French Commercial Code  
The Company is not aware of any agreements between shareholders  
as specified in paragraph 6° of Article L. 225-100-3 of the French  
Commercial Code which could result in restrictions on the transfer  
of shares and exercise of the voting rights of the Company.  
The structure of the Company’s share capital and the interests that  
the Company is aware of pursuant to Articles L. 233-7 and L. 233-  
1
 Rules applicable to the appointment and replacement  
of members of the Company’s Board of Directors  
and amendment of the bylaws  
2 of the French Commercial Code are presented in Chapter 8,  
point 4.  
Restrictions on the exercise of voting rights and transfers of  
No provision of the bylaws or an agreement made between the  
Company and a third party contains a specific provision relating  
to the appointment and/or replacement of the Company’s directors  
which is likely to have an impact in the event of a public offering.  
shares provided in the bylaws – Clauses of the agreements  
of which the Company has been informed in accordance  
with Article L. 233-11 of the French Commercial Code  
The provisions of the bylaws relating to shareholders’ voting rights  
are mentioned in point 1.11. above and in Chapter 9. The Company  
has not been informed of any clauses as specified in paragraph 2°  
of Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code.  
 Powers of the Board of Directors in the event  
of a public offering  
No delegation of authority or authorization granted by the  
Shareholders’ Meeting which is currently in effect gives specific  
powers to the Board of Directors over the Company’s shares  
during a public offering.  
Holders of securities conferring special control rights  
Article 18 of the bylaws stipulates that double voting rights are  
granted to all the shares held in the name of the same shareholder  
for at least two years. Subject to this condition, there are no  
securities conferring special control rights as specified in paragraph  
 Agreements made by the Company which are amended or  
terminated in the event of a change in control of the Company –  
Agreements providing for benefits for the members of the  
Board of Directors or employees if they resign or are dismissed  
without due reason or cause or if their employment ends  
as a result of a public offering  
4° of Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code.  
Control mechanisms specified in an employee  
shareholding system  
Although a number of agreements made by the Company contain  
a change in control clause, the Company believes that there are no  
agreements as specified in paragraph 9 or 10 of Article L. 225-100-3  
of the French Commercial Code.  
The rules relating to the exercise of voting rights within the  
Company collective investment funds are presented in point 5.1.6.  
of this Chapter 5.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
129  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
1.13. Principles and rules applied to determine the compensation  
and other benefits of the executive directors  
The principles and rules applied to determine the compensation  
and other benefits received by the executive directors, which  
were approved by the Board of Directors on February 9, 2012,  
are reproduced below.  
– The Group does not have a specific pension plan for the executive  
directors. They are eligible for retirement benefits and pensions  
schemes available to certain employee categories in the Group  
under conditions determined by the Board.  
Based on a proposal by the Compensation Committee, the Board  
adopted the following principles for determining the compensation  
and other benefits of the executive directors:  
– Stock options and performance shares are designed to align  
the long-term interests of the executive directors with those  
of the shareholders.  
Compensation and benefits for the executive directors are  
set by the Board of Directors after considering proposals from  
the Compensation Committee. Such compensation must  
be reasonable and fair, in a context that values both teamwork  
and motivation within the Company.  
The allocation of options and performance shares to the executive  
directors is examined in light of all the forms of compensation  
of each person.  
The exercise price for stock options awarded is not discounted  
compared with the market price, at the time of the grant, for the  
underlying share.  
Compensation for the executive directors is related to market  
practice, work performed, results obtained and responsibilities held.  
Stock options and performance shares are awarded at regular  
intervals to prevent any opportunistic behavior.  
Compensation for the executive directors includes both a fixed  
portion and a variable portion. The fixed portion is reviewed at  
least every two years.  
The exercise of options and the definitive allocation of performance  
shares to which the executive directors are entitled are subject  
to performance criteria that must be met over several years.  
The amount of variable compensation is reviewed each year  
and may not exceed a stated percentage of fixed compensation.  
Variable compensation is determined based on pre-defined  
quantitative and qualitative criteria that are periodically reviewed  
by the Board of Directors. Quantitative criteria are limited in number,  
objective, measurable and adapted to the Group’s strategy.  
The Board puts in place restrictions on the transfer of a portion  
of shares held upon the exercise of options and the definitive  
allocation of performance shares, applicable to the executive  
directors until the end of their term of office.  
The executive directors may not be granted stock options  
or performance shares when they leave office.  
Variable compensation is designed to reward short-term  
performance and progress towards medium-term objectives.  
The compensation is determined in line with the annual  
assessment of the performance of the executive directors  
and the Company’s medium-term strategy.  
– After three years in office, the executive directors are required  
to hold at least the number of Company shares set by the Board.  
The components of the compensation of the executive directors  
are made public after the Board of Directors’ meeting at which  
they are approved.  
The Board of Directors keeps track of the fixed and variable  
portions of the compensation of the executive directors over  
several years and in light of the Company’s performance.  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  
130  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Corporate governance  
Statutory auditor’s report  
5
2
. Statutory auditor’s report  
(
Article L. 225-235 of the French Commercial Code)  
This is a free translation into English of a report issued in French and is provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking readers. This report  
should be read in conjunction and construed in accordance with French law and the relevant professional auditing standards applicable in France.  
Year ended December 31, 2013  
Statutory Auditors’ report, prepared in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial  
Law (Code de commerce), on the report prepared by the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
of the Company TOTAL S.A.  
To the Shareholders,  
In our capacity as Statutory Auditors of TOTAL S.A., and in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial Law (Code de  
commerce), we hereby report on the report prepared by the Chairman of your company in accordance with Article L.225-37 of the French  
Commercial Law (Code de Commerce) for the year ended December 31, 2013.  
It is the Chairman’s responsibility to prepare, and submit to the Board of Directors for approval, a report on the internal control and risk  
management procedures implemented by the Company and containing the other disclosures required by Article L.225-37 of the French  
Commercial Law (Code de Commerce) relating especially to Corporate Governance.  
It is our responsibility to:  
report to you on the information contained in the Chairman’s report in respect of the internal control and risk management procedures  
relating to the preparation and processing of the accounting and financial information, and  
attest that this report contains the other disclosures required by Article L.225-37 of the French Commercial Law (Code de commerce),  
being specified that we are not responsible for verifying the fairness of these other disclosures.  
We conducted our work in accordance with professional standards applicable in France.  
Information on the internal control and risk management procedures relating to the preparation and processing  
of accounting and financial information  
These standards require that we perform the necessary procedures to assess the fairness of the information provided in the Chairman’s  
report in respect of the internal control and risk management procedures relating to the preparation and processing of the accounting  
and financial information. These procedures consisted mainly in:  
obtaining an understanding of the internal control and risk management procedures relating to the preparation and processing of the accounting  
and financial information on which the information presented in the Chairman’s report is based and of the existing documentation;  
obtaining an understanding of the work involved in the preparation of this information and of the existing documentation;  
obtaining an understanding of the evaluation process in place and assessing the quality and appropriateness of its documentation with respect  
to the information on the evaluation of internal control and risk management procedures;  
determining if any significant weaknesses in the internal control procedures relating to the preparation and processing of the accounting  
and financial information that we would have noted in the course of our engagement are properly disclosed in the Chairman’s report.  
On the basis of our work, we have nothing to report on the information in respect of the Company’s internal control and risk management  
procedures relating to the preparation and processing of accounting and financial information contained in the report prepared by the Chairman  
of the Board in accordance with Article L.225-37 of the French Commercial Law (Code de Commerce).  
Other information  
We hereby attest that the Chairman’s report includes the other disclosures required by Article L.225-37 of the French Commercial Law  
(Code de commerce).  
Paris-La Défense, March 6, 2014  
The statutory auditors  
French original signed by  
KPMG Audit  
A division of KPMG S.A.  
Jay Nirsimloo  
ERNST & YOUNG Audit  
Pascal Macioce  
Laurent Vitse  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
131  
 
Corporate governance  
5
General Management  
3. General Management  
3.1. Management Form  
On the proposal of the Governance & Ethics Committee, the Board  
of Directors decided, at its meeting of May 11, 2012, to maintain  
the management form formally adopted at the Board meeting of  
May 21, 2010, namely the unification of the functions of Chairman  
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and to  
confirm Mr. Christophe de Margerie in his function as Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer for a period equal to that of his term of office  
as director, which will expire at the end of the Shareholders’  
Meeting called to approve the accounts for the financial year ending  
December 31, 2014.  
The Board of Directors deemed that the unified management form  
was the most appropriate to the Group’s business and to the  
specificities of the oil and gas sectors. This decision took into  
account the advantage of unified management and the  
composition of the Board Committees which include a large  
proportion of independent directors, thereby ensuring balanced  
authority (for further information regarding the reasons for selecting  
the unified management form, see point 1.7.1. of this Chapter 5).  
The management form selected will remain in effect until a decision  
to the contrary is made by the Board of Directors.  
As a result, Mr. de Margerie has served as Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A. since May 21, 2010.  
3.2. The Executive Committee  
The Executive Committee, under the responsibility of the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer, is the decision-making body of the Group.  
As of December 31, 2013, the members of TOTAL’s Executive  
Committee were as follows:  
It implements the strategy formulated by the Board of Directors  
and authorizes related investments, subject to the approval of the  
Board of Directors for investments exceeding 3% of the Group’s  
equity or notification of the Board for investments exceeding 1%  
of equity.  
– Christophe de Margerie, Chairman of the Executive Committee,  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;  
– Philippe Boisseau, President of Marketing & Services and New  
Energies;  
– Yves-Louis Darricarrère, President of Upstream  
(
Exploration & Production division and Gas & Power);  
In 2013, the Executive Committee met at least twice a month,  
except in August when it met only once.  
Jean-Jacques Guilbaud, Chief Administrative Officer;  
Patrick de La Chevardière, Chief Financial Officer; and  
Patrick Pouyanné, President of Refining & Chemicals.  
3.3. The Management Committee  
The Management Committee facilitates coordination among  
the different entities of the Group and monitors the operating results  
of the operational divisions and the activity reports of the functional  
divisions.  
Upstream  
Marc Blaizot, Arnaud Breuillac, Olivier Cleret de Langavant, Isabelle  
Gaildraud, Michel Hourcard, Jacques Marraud des Grottes,  
Philippe Sauquet.  
In addition to the members of the Executive Committee, the  
following twenty-three individuals from various operating divisions  
and non-operating departments served as members of the  
Management Committee as of December 31, 2013:  
Refining & Chemicals  
Pierre Barbé, Bertrand Deroubaix, Jacques Maigné, Jean-Jacques  
Mosconi, Bernard Pinatel, Bernadette Spinoy.  
Marketing & Services  
Corporate  
Benoît Luc, Momar Nguer.  
Peter Herbel, Jean-Marc Jaubert, Helle Kristoffersen, Manoelle  
Lepoutre, Jean-François Minster, Jacques-Emmanuel Saulnier,  
Jérôme Schmitt, François Viaud.  
132  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Corporate governance  
Statutory auditors  
5
4. Statutory auditors  
4.1. Statutory auditors  
ERNST & YOUNG Audit  
/2, place des Saisons, 92400 Courbevoie-Paris-La Défense, Cedex 1  
1
Appointed: May 14, 2004  
Appointment renewed on May 21, 2010, for an additional 6-fiscal year term  
P. Macioce, L. Vitse  
KPMG Audit  
A division of KPMG S.A.  
1, cours Valmy, 92923 Paris-La Défense  
Appointed: 13 May 1998  
Appointment renewed on May 21, 2010, for an additional 6-fiscal year term  
J. Nirsimloo  
4.2. Alternate auditors  
Cabinet Auditex  
/2, place des Saisons, 92400 Courbevoie-Paris-La Défense, Cedex 1  
1
Appointed: May 21, 2010, for six financial years  
KPMG Audit IS  
3, cours du Triangle, Immeuble “Le Palatin”, Puteaux, 92939 Paris-La Défense, Cedex  
Appointed: May 21, 2010, for six financial years  
4.3. Auditor’s term of office  
French law provides that the statutory and alternate auditors are appointed for renewable 6-fiscal year terms. The terms of office of the  
statutory auditors and of the alternate auditors will expire at the end of the Shareholders’ Meeting called in 2016 to approve the financial  
statements for fiscal year 2015.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
133  
 
Corporate governance  
5
Share ownership  
4.4. Fees received by the statutory auditors (including members of their network)  
Ernst & Young Audit  
Amount in millions  
of euros (excluding VAT)  
KPMG Audit  
Amount in millions  
of euros (excluding VAT)  
%
%
2013  
2012  
2013  
2012  
2013  
2012  
2013  
2012  
Audit  
Audit and certification  
of the parent company  
and consolidated accounts  
TOTAL S.A.  
Fully-consolidated subsidiaries  
Other work and services directly  
related to the responsibilities  
of statutory auditors  
TOTAL S.A.  
3.6  
14.8  
3.3  
15.2  
16.1  
66.1  
14.8  
68.2  
3.1  
12.1  
3.0  
11.3  
14.0  
54.8  
15.1  
56.8  
0.3  
1.0  
0.6  
1.0  
1.3  
4.4  
2.7  
4.5  
1.7  
3.0  
1.1  
2.7  
7.7  
13.5  
5.5  
13.6  
Fully-consolidated subsidiaries  
Subtotal  
19.7  
20.1  
87.9  
90.2  
19.9  
18.1  
90.0  
91.0  
Other services provided  
by the network to fully-  
consolidated subsidiaries  
Legal, tax, labor law  
Other  
2.5  
0.2  
2.1  
0.1  
11.2  
0.9  
9.4  
0.4  
1.9  
0.3  
1.8  
-
8.6  
1.4  
9.0  
-
Subtotal  
Total  
2.7  
2.2  
12.1  
100  
9.8  
2.2  
1.8  
10.0  
100  
9.0  
22.4  
22.3  
100  
22.1  
19.9  
100  
5. Share ownership  
5.1. Arrangements for involving employees in the Company’s share capital  
5
.1.1. Employee incentive and profit-sharing  
5.1.2. Company savings plans  
agreements  
Pursuant to agreements signed on March 15, 2002 and their  
On June 29, 2012, a new incentive and profit-sharing agreement  
was signed for fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014, concerning  
TOTAL S.A., Elf Exploration Production, Total Exploration Production  
France, CDF Énergie, Total Raffinage Marketing (newly named Total  
Marketing Services), Total Additifs et Carburants Spéciaux, Total  
Lubrifiants, Total Fluides, Totalgaz, Total Raffinage-Chimie, Total  
Petrochemicals France and Total Raffinage France. Under the terms  
of this agreement, the amount available  
for employee profit-sharing is determined based on the return  
on equity (ROE) performance of the Group, as well as on the trend  
of the Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) in view of the objectives  
and thresholds set out for each business unit.  
amendments, the Group created a “TOTAL Group Savings Plan”  
(PEGT) and a “Complementary Company Savings Plan” (PEC)  
for employees of the Group’s French companies having adhered  
to these plans. These plans allow investments in a number of  
mutual funds including one invested in Company shares (“TOTAL  
ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”). A “Shareholder Group Savings Plan”  
(PEG-A) has also been in place since November 19, 1999 to  
facilitate capital increases reserved for employees of the Group’s  
French and foreign subsidiaries covered by these plans.  
Company savings plans give employees of the Group’s French  
companies that adhere to these plans the ability to make discretionary  
contributions (which the companies of the Group may, under  
certain conditions, supplement) to the plans invested in the shares  
of the Company. The companies of the Group made gross  
additional contributions (abondement) to various savings plans that  
totaled 73.9 million in 2013.  
The amount of the special incentive and profit-sharing reserve  
to be distributed by all of the companies that signed the Group  
agreements for fiscal year 2013 would total approximately  
135 million.  
134  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Corporate governance  
Share ownership  
5
5
.1.3. Capital increase reserved  
(in Belgium). In addition, employees in certain other countries  
benefited from the leveraged subscription offer by means of a  
dedicated vehicle.  
for Group Employees  
By the seventeenth resolution of the Combined Shareholders’ Meeting  
held on May 11, 2012, the shareholders delegated to the Board of  
Directors the authority to increase the share capital of the Company  
in one or more transactions and within a maximum period of  
twenty-six months from the date of the meeting, reserving  
subscriptions for such issuance to the Group Employees  
participating in a company savings plan.  
The previous capital increases reserved for employees were  
conducted under the PEG-A through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT  
FRANCE” fund for employees of the Group’s French subsidiaries  
and through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL  
CAPITALISATION” fund for the employees of foreign subsidiaries.  
In addition, U.S. employees participated in these operations by  
directly subscribing to American Depositary Shares (ADS), and  
Italian employees (as well as German employees starting in 2011)  
by directly subscribing to new shares at the Group Caisse Autonome.  
At the same Shareholders’ Meeting, the shareholders also delegated  
to the Board of Directors powers to increase the share capital of  
the Company in one or more transactions and within a maximum  
period of eighteen months from the date of the meeting, in view of  
giving the employees of foreign subsidiaries similar advantages as  
those granted to employees covered by the seventeenth resolution.  
5.1.4. Capital increase from the global free  
share plan for employees of the Group  
Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, at its meeting  
on September 18, 2012 decided to proceed with a capital increase  
reserved for employees of the Group, including a standard subscription  
offer and a leveraged offer at the discretion of the employees, within  
the limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012.  
This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215  
shares, each with a par value of 2.50 at the unit price of 30.70,  
the issuance of which was recognized on April 25, 2013.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting on May 16, 2008 authorized the Board  
of Directors to proceed with the free grant of Company shares to  
employees of the Group as well as to executive directors of the  
Company or Group companies, for a period of thirty-eight months,  
within the limit of 0.8% of the outstanding share capital at the date  
of the decision of the Board of Directors to grant such shares.  
Pursuant to this authorization, the Board of Directors at its meeting  
on May 21, 2010 decided on the terms and conditions of the global  
plan of free TOTAL shares in favor of the employees of the Group  
and delegated to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the  
Company all powers necessary for implementing this plan.  
The previous capital increase reserved for employees of the Group  
had been decided by the Board of Directors at its meeting on  
October 28, 2010 pursuant to the authorization of the Combined  
Shareholders’ Meeting on May 21, 2010 and had resulted in the  
subscription of 8,902,717 shares, each with a par value of 2.50 at  
the unit price of 34.80, the issuance of which had been  
recognized on April 28, 2011.  
To this end, on July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
of the Group acknowledged the issue and definitive grant of 1,366,950  
common shares, each with a par value of 2.50, to the designated  
beneficiaries in application of the grant conditions approved by the  
Board of Directors at its meeting of May 21, 2010 (for further information  
on TOTAL’s global free share plan, see point 4.5.2. of Chapter 6).  
The capital increase reserved for employees approved by the Board  
of Directors at its meeting of September 18, 2012, was conducted  
under the PEG-A: (i) for employees of the Group’s French  
subsidiaries, through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” fund in  
the case of standard subscription and through the “TOTAL  
FRANCE CAPITAL+” fund in the case of subscription to the  
leveraged offer; and (ii) for employees of foreign subsidiaries,  
through the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL  
CAPITALISATION” fund in the case of standard subscription and  
through the “TOTAL INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL” fund in the case of  
subscription to the leveraged offer. In addition, U.S. employees  
participated in this operation by directly subscribing to American  
Depositary Shares (ADS), and Italian and German employees by  
directly subscribing to new shares at the Group Caisse Autonome  
5
.1.5. Pension savings plan  
The September 29, 2004 Group agreement on the provisions for  
retirement savings set up a Collective Retirement Savings Plan (PERCO).  
An amendment to this plan signed on April 15, 2011 provides for the  
additional contribution of credit transferred from the time-savings scheme  
to the PERCO (CET-PERCO gateway). An amendment to the plan  
signed on March 30, 2012 adjusted the management mechanisms of  
the PERCO in order to better secure retirement savings and extended  
the scope of the agreement to include Total Petrochemicals France,  
Total Raffinage-Chimie and Total Raffinage France.  
5.1.6. Employee shareholding  
The total number of TOTAL shares held directly or indirectly by the Group’s employees as of December 31, 2013, is as follows:  
TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE  
TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISATION  
TOTAL FRANCE CAPITAL+  
TOTAL INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL  
82,067,730  
21,879,234  
2,505,002  
931,374  
ELF PRIVATISATION N°1  
817,988  
Shares held by U.S. employees  
531,615  
Group Caisse Autonome (Belgium)  
474,490  
TOTAL shares from the exercise of the Company’s stock options and held as registered shares within a Company Savings Plan  
3,122,627  
Total shares held by employees  
112,330,060  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
135  
Corporate governance  
5
Share ownership  
As of December 31, 2013, the employees of the Group held, on the  
basis of the definition of employee shareholding set forth in Article  
L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code, 112,330,060 TOTAL  
shares, representing 4.72% of the Company’s share capital and  
attached to portfolio securities, deciding contribution of securities in  
case of a public tender offer, deciding mergers, spin-offs or liquidations,  
and granting its approval prior to changes in the rules and procedures  
of the Collective investment fund in the conditions provided for by  
the rules and procedures.  
8.63% of the voting rights that could be exercised at a  
Shareholders’ Meeting on that date.  
These rules and procedures also stipulate a simple majority vote  
for decisions, except for decisions requiring a qualified majority  
vote of two-thirds plus one related to a change in a fund’s rules  
and procedures, its conversion or disposal.  
The management of each of the five FCPEs (Collective investment  
funds) mentioned above is controlled by a dedicated Supervisory  
board, two-thirds of its members representing holders of fund units  
and one-third representing the Company. The Board is responsible  
for reviewing the Collective investment fund’s management report  
and annual financial statements, as well as the financial, administrative  
and accounting management of the fund, exercising voting rights  
For employees holding shares outside of the employee collective  
investment funds mentioned in the table above, voting rights are  
exercised individually.  
5.2. Shares held by the administration and management bodies  
As of December 31, 2013, based on information from the members  
of the Board and the share registrar, the members of the Board and  
the Group’s Executive Officers (Management Committee and  
Treasurer) held a total of less than 0.5% of the share capital:  
portion of their annual compensation. These shares have  
to be acquired within three years from the appointment to the  
Executive Committee.  
The number of TOTAL shares to be considered includes:  
members of the Board of Directors (including the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer): 330,080 shares;  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: 121,556 shares and  
directly held shares, whether or not they are subject to transfer  
restrictions; and  
shares in the collective investment fund invested in TOTAL shares.  
65,242 shares in the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE”  
collective investment fund;  
Management Committee (including the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer) and Treasurer: 742,544 shares.  
5.2.1. Summary of transactions in the  
Company’s securities (Article L. 621-18-2  
of the French Monetary and Financial Code)  
By decision of the Board of Directors:  
The following table presents transactions, of which the Company  
has been informed, in the Company’s shares or related financial  
instruments carried out in 2013 by the individuals concerned under  
paragraphs a) through c) of Article L. 621-18-2 of the French  
Monetary and Financial Code.  
the executive directors are required to hold a number of shares  
of the Company equal in value to two years of the fixed portion of  
their annual compensation;  
members of the Executive Committee are required to hold a number  
of shares of the Company equal in value to two years of the fixed  
Year 2013  
Acquisition Subscription  
Transfer  
Exchange  
Exercise  
of stock  
options  
Christophe de Margerie(a)  
Philippe Boisseau(a)  
TOTAL shares  
-
-
-
-
-
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b)  
TOTAL shares  
5,824.18  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,000.00  
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b)  
TOTAL shares  
7,438.61  
-
417.88  
-
7,517.69  
9,000.00  
-
-
-
Yves-Louis Darricarrère(a)  
29,700.00  
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b) 13,305.46  
-
-
23,799.69  
-
-
-
-
Patrick de La Chevardière(a) TOTAL shares  
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b)  
Jean-Jacques Guilbaud(a) TOTAL shares  
-
22,000.00  
9,018.11  
-
2,026.82  
-
18,362.59  
4,925.00  
-
-
-
21,120.00  
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b)  
TOTAL shares  
9,377.80  
-
353.00  
-
22,406.86  
-
-
-
-
Patrick Pouyanné(a)  
8,000.00  
Shares in collective investment plans (FCPE),  
and other related financial instruments(b)  
7,414.36  
-
6,828.66  
-
-
(
(
a) Including the related individuals in the meaning of the provisions of the Article R. 621-43-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.  
b) Collective investment funds (FCPE) primarily invested in Company shares.  
136  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
12.  
Responsabilité sociale, environ-  
Compensation for the administration  
and management bodies  
nementale et sociétale  
6
Compensation for the administration  
and management bodies  
1
.
.
Board members’ compensation  
138  
2
Compensation of the executive directors  
140  
2
2
.1.  
.2.  
Compensation policy for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140  
Commitments made to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer: pension plans, termination payments and other  
commitments (Article L. 225-102-1, paragraph 3, of the French Commercial Code) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .141  
Compensation due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .143  
2.3.  
3
.
.
Executive officers’ compensation  
146  
147  
4
Stock option and performance share grants policy  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
4.4.  
4.5.  
General policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147  
Follow up of the grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147  
Grants to employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .151  
Follow up of TOTAL stock option plans as of December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .152  
Follow up of TOTAL performance share grants as of December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155  
5.  
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted  
to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013,  
as submitted to the Shareholder’s Meeting for advisory vote  
159  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
137  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Board compensation  
1. Board members’ compensation  
The conditions applicable to Board members’ compensation  
are defined by the Board of Directors on the proposal of the  
Compensation Committee, subject to the overall maximum amount  
of directors’ fees authorized by the Shareholders’ Meeting.  
– a premium of 2,000 for travel from a country outside France  
to attend a Board of Directors or Committee meeting; and  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive  
directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A. or any other company  
of the Group;  
The overall maximum amount of directors’ fees allocated to members  
of the Board of Directors was set at 1.4 million for each fiscal year  
by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 17, 2013.  
the total amount paid to each director is determined after taking  
into consideration the director’s actual presence at each Board  
of Directors’ or Committee meeting and, if appropriate, after  
prorating the amount set for each director, such that the overall  
amount paid remains within the maximum limit set by the  
Shareholders’ Meeting.  
In 2013, the overall amount of directors’ fees due to the members  
of the Board of Directors was 1.25 million, noting that there were  
fifteen directors as of December 31, 2013.  
The allocation of the overall amount of directors’ fees for fiscal year  
2
013 is based on an allocation formula comprised of fixed  
These rules for allocating directors’ fees, initially defined by the  
Board of Directors at its meeting on October 27, 2011, were confirmed  
by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 9, 2012, during  
which the Board also decided to prorate the total amounts paid to  
each director if the maximum amount authorized by the Shareholders’  
Meeting is exceeded. These rules were again confirmed by the  
Board of Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013.  
compensation and variable compensation based on fixed amounts  
per meeting, which makes it possible to take into account each  
director’s actual attendance at the meetings of the Board of  
Directors and its Committees, subject to the conditions below:  
a fixed annual amount of 20,000 is to be paid to each director  
calculated on a pro rata basis in case of a change during the  
(
year), apart from the Chairman of the Audit Committee, who is  
to be paid 30,000 and the other Audit Committee members,  
who are to be paid 25,000;  
At the same Board meeting, it was decided that the amount of fees  
paid to directors for a fiscal year will be paid, on the decision of  
the Board of Directors and following a proposal of the Governance  
and Ethics Committee, at the beginning of the next fiscal year.  
an amount of 5,000 per director for each Board of Directors’  
meeting actually attended;  
The table below presents the total compensation (including in-kind  
benefits) due and paid to each director in office during the last two  
fiscal years (Article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code,  
1st and 2nd paragraphs).  
an amount of 3,500 per director for each Governance and  
Ethics Committee, Compensation Committee or Strategic  
Committee meeting actually attended;  
an amount of 7,000 per director for each Audit Committee  
meeting actually attended;  
138  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Board compensation  
6
Directors’ fees and other compensation due and paid to the executive and non-executive directors  
(mandataires sociaux) (AMF Table No. 3)  
Fiscal year endend December 31,  
2012  
2013  
Amounts  
due  
Amounts  
paid  
Amounts  
due  
Amounts  
paid  
(Gross amount – )  
Christophe de Margerie  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
none  
none  
none  
none  
(
a)  
(a)  
(a)  
(a)  
Thierry Desmarest  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation: retirement pension  
76,014  
575,290  
76,014  
575,290  
89,500  
578,940  
-
(b)  
578,940  
Patrick Artus  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
72,921  
none  
72,921  
none  
79,500  
none  
-
-
Patricia Barbizet  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
118,883  
none  
118,883  
none  
134,500  
none  
-
-
Daniel Bouton(c)  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
28,472  
none  
28,472  
none  
-
-
-
none  
Gunnar Brock  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
79,992  
none  
79,992  
none  
102,500  
none  
-
-
Claude Clément(d)  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
60,546  
102,883  
60,546  
102,883  
31,000  
92,153  
-
92,153  
Marie-Christine Coisne-Roquette  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
100,763  
none  
100,763  
none  
129,500  
none  
-
-
Bertrand Collomb  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
69,827  
none  
69,827  
none  
67,500  
none  
-
-
Paul Desmarais, jr.  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
64,966  
none  
64,966  
none  
47,000  
none  
-
-
Anne-Marie Idrac(e)  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
32,075  
none  
32,075  
none  
75,500  
none  
-
-
Charles Keller(f)  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
-
-
-
-
36,000  
64,586  
-
64,586  
Barbara Kux  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
71,153  
none  
71,153  
none  
79,000  
none  
-
-
Gérard Lamarche  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
121,695  
none  
121,695  
none  
143,500  
none  
-
-
Anne Lauvergeon  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
60,546  
none  
60,546  
none  
65,500  
none  
-
-
Claude Mandil  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
69,827  
none  
69,827  
none  
93,000  
none  
-
-
Michel Pébereau  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
65,408  
none  
65,408  
none  
77,500  
none  
-
-
Thierry de Rudder(g)  
Directors’ fees  
Other compensation  
6,912  
none  
6,912  
none  
-
-
-
none  
Total  
1,778,173  
1,778,173  
1,986,679  
735,679  
(
a) For the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, see the summary compensation tables given in point 2.3.4. of this Chapter. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive  
directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A. or any other company of the Group.  
b) Mr. Desmarest does not receive any compensation for duties related to representing the Group internationally.  
c) Director until May 11, 2012.  
(
(
(
(
(
(
d) Director representing employee shareholders until May 17, 2013.  
e) Director since May 11, 2012.  
f) Director representing employee shareholders since May 17, 2013.  
g) Director until January 12, 2012.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
139  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Compensation of the executive directors  
Over the past two years, the directors currently in office have not  
received any compensation or in-kind benefits from companies  
controlled by TOTAL S.A., except for Mr. Clément, who is an  
employee of Total Raffinage-Chimie.  
The compensation indicated in the table above (except for that of  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Clément, Mr. Keller  
and Mr. Desmarest) consists solely of directors’ fees (gross amount)  
due for the period under review. Moreover, there is no service  
contract linking a Director to TOTAL S.A. or any companies  
controlled by it which provides for benefits under such contract.  
2. Compensation of the executive directors  
2.1. Compensation policy for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
2.1.1. General principles  
2.1.2. Compensation policy for fiscal year 2014  
The policy related to the compensation of the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer is approved by the Board of Directors on the  
proposal of the Compensation Committee. It is determined in  
accordance with the “Principles and rules for determining the  
compensation and other benefits of the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer”.  
On February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, on the proposal of  
the Compensation Committee, decided that the compensation of  
Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal  
year 2014 will consist of a fixed base salary of 1,500,000,  
unchanged from the amount set by the Board of Directors on May  
21, 2010, and a variable portion, to be paid in 2015, not exceeding  
1
80% of the base salary, based in particular on practices at a  
These principles and rules, approved by the Board of Directors at  
its meeting on February 9, 2012, are presented in the Chairman’s  
Report on Corporate Governance (see point 1.13. of Chapter 5).  
They are based on the fundamental principles for determining the  
compensation of the executive directors set out in the AFEP-MEDEF  
Code and ensure the consistency and stability of the compensation  
policy in line with the Group’s strategy.  
reference sample of companies operating in the energy sectors.  
On the proposal of the Compensation Committee, the Board of  
Directors also decided to maintain for fiscal year 2014 the various  
criteria for determining the variable portion defined in 2013, after  
confirming their appropriateness based on the Group’s strategic  
priorities.  
The Board of Directors and Compensation Committee pay special  
attention to ensuring that the compensation policy is structured to  
create long-term value for the Company (in particular by introducing  
non-financial performance indicators) and is proportionate to the  
responsibility assumed while remaining reasonable and fair, in a  
context that values teamwork and motivation within the Company.  
Consequently, the various criteria used for determining the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer’s variable portion for fiscal year 2014  
will be based, for up to 100% of the base salary, on economic  
parameters that refer to quantitative targets reflecting the Group’s  
performance (with these economic parameters assessed on a linear  
basis between two performance levels to avoid threshold effects)  
and, for up to 80% of the base salary, on the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer’s personal contribution, which allows a qualitative  
assessment of management.  
They also ensure a balance among the various components of the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation (fixed portion,  
variable portion, long-term performance share compensation plan).  
The benefit accruing from participation in the pension plans is taken  
into consideration when determining the compensation policy  
applicable to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in line with  
the principles of the AFEP-MEDEF Code.  
The economic criteria include:  
return on equity for up to 50% of the base salary;  
– the Company’s results, in comparison with the results of four  
major competing oil companies(1), assessed by reference to the  
average growth over three years of two indicators, net earnings  
per share and net income. Each indicator has a weighting of up  
to 25% of the base salary.  
The relative position of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s  
compensation to that of comparable issuers (in particular, CAC 40  
companies and issuers operating in the oil and gas sectors) is  
examined every year, if necessary on the basis of studies  
undertaken by specialized firms.  
The expected levels of attainment of the quantitative economic  
parameter targets for determining the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer’s variable portion were clearly defined by the  
Board of Directors at its meeting on February 11, 2014, but have  
not been made public for reasons of confidentiality.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not take part in any  
discussions or deliberations of the corporate bodies regarding  
items on the agenda of Board of Directors’ meetings related to the  
assessment of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s  
performance or the determination of the components comprising  
his compensation.  
(1) ExxonMobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron.  
140  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Compensation of the executive directors  
6
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution  
will be assessed, for up to 80% of the base salary, based on six  
pre-determined, clearly defined quantitative or qualitative criteria,  
each with a weighting of up to 13 to 15% of the base salary.  
These include:  
– the performance of the Refining & Chemicals and  
Marketing & Services segments assessed on the basis  
of the annual targets of these segments;  
the success of key negotiations involving the Group’s strategy;  
CSR performance, which is measured in particular according to  
Health, Safety and Environment performance, measured mainly  
according to attainment of the annual Total Recordable Injury  
Rate (TRIR) target;  
attainment of the CO emissions and energy efficiency targets and  
2
the Group’s position in the rankings of non-financial rating agencies.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will also continue to have  
the use of a company car and be covered by a life insurance plan  
(see point 2.2.3. of this Chapter).  
the increase in hydrocarbon production;  
the increase in hydrocarbon reserves;  
2.2. Commitments made to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer:  
pension plans, termination payments and other commitments  
Article L. 225-102-1, paragraph 3, of the French Commercial Code)  
(
The commitments made to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer regarding pension and life insurance plans, retirement benefit  
and termination payment for removal from office or non-renewal of  
his term of office, as described below, were approved by the Board  
of Directors on February 9, 2012 and by the Shareholders’ Meeting  
on May 11, 2012, in accordance with Article L. 225-42-1 of the  
French Commercial Code.  
of this supplementary plan is indexed to changes in the ARRCO  
pension point. The sum of the supplementary pension plan benefits  
and external pension plan benefits may not exceed 45% of the  
compensation used as the calculation basis. In the event this  
percentage is exceeded, the supplementary pension is reduced  
accordingly.  
The compensation taken into account to calculate the supplementary  
pension is the retiree’s last 3-year average gross compensation  
(fixed and variable portions).  
2.2.1. Pension plans  
Pursuant to applicable law, the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer is eligible for the basic French social security pension  
and for pension benefits under the ARRCO (Association pour le  
Régime de Retraite Complémentaire des Salariés) and AGIRC  
In the case of Mr. de Margerie, to date, the ceilings applicable for  
determining the amount of the retirement pension he may benefit  
from under the terms of this defined benefit supplementary pension  
plan have been reached, both in terms of seniority (Mr. de Margerie  
joined the Group in 1974) and compensation (his last 3-year  
average gross compensation is more than the threshold of sixty  
times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security  
contributions, i.e., 2,221,920 in 2013).  
(Association Générale des Institutions de Retraite des Cadres)  
government-sponsored supplementary pension schemes.  
He also participates in the internal defined contribution pension  
plan known as RECOSUP. This pension plan represented a booked  
expense to the Company in favor of the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 of 2,222.  
The commitments made to him by TOTAL S.A. under the terms  
of the defined benefit supplementary pension plans and similar  
would thus, as of December 31, 2013, represent a gross annual  
retirement pension estimated at 582,000, i.e., 17.96% of the  
gross annual compensation paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer in 2013 (fixed portion for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal  
year 2012).  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also participates in a  
defined benefit supplementary pension plan set up and financed  
by the Company. This plan, for which management is outsourced,  
applies to all employees of the Group whose annual compensation  
is greater than eight times the ceiling for calculating French social  
security contributions (37,548 in 2014). Compensation above this  
amount does not qualify as pensionable compensation under either  
government-sponsored or contractual pension schemes.  
The Group’s commitments related to these defined benefit  
supplementary pension plans and similar (including the retirement  
benefit mentioned in point 2.2.2.) is outsourced to an insurance  
company for almost its entire amount, the not outsourced balance  
being evaluated in an annual basis and subject to an adjustment  
through a provision in the accounts. The Groups commitments  
amount, as of December 31, 2013, to 19.1 million for the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (34.8 million for the  
executive and non executive directors (mandataires sociaux)  
participating in these plans including the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer). These amounts represent the gross value of the  
Group’s commitments to these beneficiaries based on a statistical  
life expectancy, and include the additional tax contribution for an  
amount of 30% on pensions that exceed eight annual ceilings for  
Social Security, payable by the Company to the French administration  
in charge of collecting social security contributions (URSSAF)  
To be eligible for this supplementary pension plan, participants  
must meet specific age and length of service (five years) criteria.  
They must also still be employed by the Group’s company upon  
retirement, unless they retire due to disability or have taken early  
retirement at the Group’s initiative after the age of fifty-five.  
The plan provides participants with a pension equal to the sum  
of 1.8% of the portion of the reference compensation between  
eight and forty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social  
security contributions and 1% of the reference compensation  
between forty and sixty times the annual ceiling for calculating  
French social security contributions, multiplied by the number  
of years of service (up to twenty years). The basis for the calculation  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
141  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Compensation of the executive directors  
(
i.e., 4.0 million for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Performance condition  
and 7.6 million for the concerned executive and non executive  
In accordance with Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial  
Code, the Board of Directors decided, at its meeting on February 9,  
2012, to make entitlement to termination payment and a retirement  
benefit contingent upon a performance condition which is considered  
to be fulfilled if at least two of the three criteria set out below are met:  
directors including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).  
The sum of all the pension plans in which Mr. de Margerie participates  
would, as of December 31, 2013, represent a gross annual  
retirement pension estimated to 718,500, i.e., 22.17% of his  
gross annual compensation paid in 2013 (fixed portion for 2013  
and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).  
the average ROE (return on equity) over the three years  
preceding the year in which the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer retires is at least 12%;  
In line with the principles used to determine the compensation  
of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as set out in  
the AFEP-MEDEF Code to which the Company refers, the Board  
of Directors has taken account of the benefit conferred through  
participation in the pension plans when determining the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation.  
the average ROACE (return on average capital employed) over  
the three years preceding the year in which the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 10%;  
– TOTAL’s oil and gas production growth over the three years  
preceding the year in which the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer retires is greater than or equal to the average production  
growth rate of the four other major competing oil companies:  
ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Chevron.  
2
.2.2. Termination payment  
and retirement benefit  
Retirement benefit  
These criteria were selected to take into account the Company’s  
general interest, shareholder interests and standard market practices,  
especially in the oil and gas industry.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is entitled to a retirement  
benefit equal to that available to eligible members of the Group  
under the French National Collective Bargaining Agreement for  
the Petroleum Industry. This benefit amounts to 25% of the gross  
annual compensation (fixed and variable portions) received during  
the 12-month period preceding the executive director’s retirement.  
More specifically, the ROE performance criterion allows the termination  
payment and retirement benefit to be tied to the Company’s overall  
shareholder return. Shareholders can use ROE to gauge the  
Company’s ability to generate profit from the capital they invested  
and from prior year earnings reinvested in the Company.  
Pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French  
Commercial Code, entitlement to this benefit is subject to the  
performance conditions detailed below.  
ROACE is used by most oil and gas companies to assess the  
operational performance of average capital employed, regardless of  
whether it is funded by equity or debt. ROACE is an indicator of the  
return on capital employed by the Company for operational activities  
and, as a result, makes it possible to tie the payment of termination  
payment and retirement benefit to the value created for the Company.  
The retirement benefit cannot be combined with the termination  
payment described below.  
Termination payment  
The third and last criterion used by the Board of Directors is the  
Group’s oil and gas production growth compared with that of its  
competitors. This indicator is widely used in the industry to measure  
operational performance and the ability to ensure the sustainable  
development of the Group, most of whose capital expenditure is  
allocated to Upstream activities.  
If the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is removed from office  
or his term of office is not renewed by the Company, he is entitled  
to termination payment equal to two years’ gross compensation.  
The calculation will be based on the gross compensation (including  
both fixed and variable portions) of the 12-month period preceding  
the date of termination or non-renewal of his term of office.  
This termination payment will be paid in the event of a change of  
control or strategy. It will not be due in cases of gross negligence  
or willful misconduct or if the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
leaves the Company of his own volition, accepts new  
responsibilities within the Group, or may claim full retirement  
benefits within a short time period.  
2
.2.3. Life insurance plan  
In accordance with the decisions made by the Board of Directors  
on February 11, 2009, confirmed by the Board of Directors’  
decision on February 9, 2012 and May 11, 2012, the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer is covered by a life insurance plan paid by  
the Company. This plan guarantees, upon death, a payment equal  
to two years’ gross compensation (fixed and variable portions),  
increased to three years in case of accidental death and, in the  
event of permanent disability due to an accident, a payment  
proportional to the degree of disability.  
Pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French  
Commercial Code, entitlement to this benefit is subject to the  
performance conditions detailed below.  
142  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Compensation of the executive directors  
6
2
.2.4. Summary table (AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code – AMF position-  
recommendations No. 2009-16)  
AMF Table No. 11  
Executive directors  
Employment  
contract  
Supplementary  
pension plans  
Payments or benefits due  
or likely to be due upon  
Benefits related  
to a non-compete  
termination or change in duties agreement  
Christophe de Margerie  
NO  
YES  
YES  
NO  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Start of term of office: February 2007(a)  
End of current term of office:  
Shareholders’ Meeting held in 2015  
to approve the financial statements  
for the year ended December 31, 2014  
Internal defined benefit  
supplementary pension plan(c)  
and defined contribution  
pension plan known  
as RECOSUP(d) which  
is also applicable to certain  
Group employees  
Termination payment(b)  
Retirement benefit(b)  
(
(
a) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 21, 2010; Chief Executive Officer since February 14, 2007.  
b) Payment subject to a performance condition in accordance with the decision of the Board of Directors on February 9, 2012. Details of these commitments are set out above.  
The retirement benefit cannot be combined with the termination payment described above.  
(
(
c) An annual pension that would be equivalent, as of December 31, 2013, to 17.96% of the annual compensation received in 2013.  
d) Mr. de Margerie’s pension benefit represented a booked expense of 2,222 for fiscal year 2013.  
2.3. Compensation due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
for fiscal year 2013  
2
.3.1. Fixed and variable elements  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, after  
reviewing the attainment of the economic parameters as well as  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution for  
fiscal year 2013, set the variable portion of the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer’s compensation for fiscal year 2013 at 132.48%  
of his annual fixed compensation, i.e., 1,987,200 (compared to  
of compensation  
The compensation paid to Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 was approved by the Board  
of Directors at its meeting on February 11, 2014, further to the  
proposal of the Compensation Committee, in accordance with  
the compensation policy defined by the Board of Directors at its  
meeting on February 12, 2013.  
1
16.11%, i.e., 1,741,000 for fiscal year 2012). 77.48%% relates  
to the share for the different selected economic parameters and  
5% to the share for the personal contribution of the Chairman and  
5
This compensation consists of a base salary (fixed portion) of  
Chief Executive Officer determined on the basis of a detailed  
evaluation of the six pre-determined, clearly defined criteria.  
1,500,000, unchanged from the amount set by the Board of  
Directors on May 21, 2010, together with a variable portion (paid in  
014) amounting to 1,987,200, which corresponds to 132.48%  
Concerning the economic parameters, the return on equity of the  
Group was lower in 2013 than in 2012, but the Group’s performance,  
in comparison with its main competitors (in terms of earnings per  
share and net income), were considerably higher in 2013 than in  
2012, which led to an increase of the part allocated for the different  
economic parameters compared to the previous fiscal year  
(77.48% of the fixed compensation for fiscal year 2013 compared  
to 64.11% for fiscal year 2012).  
2
of his fixed annual compensation which was determined as follows.  
At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors, further  
to the proposal of the Compensation Committee, decided that the  
compensation of Mr. de Margerie as Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer for fiscal year 2013 would consist of a fixed base salary of  
1,500,000, unchanged from the amount set by the Board of  
Directors on May 21, 2010, and a variable portion, to be paid in  
014, not exceeding 180% (instead of 165% in 2012) of the base  
Concerning the personal contribution, the Board of Directors  
considered that most of the objectives were achieved, particularly  
the targets in terms of Safety, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)  
and concerning the success of strategic negotiations in producing  
countries. This personal contribution was then set to 55% (against  
a maximum of 80%) for fiscal year 2013 compared to 52% (against  
a maximum of 65%) for fiscal year 2012.  
2
salary, based in particular on practices at a reference sample of  
companies operating in the energy sectors.  
The Board of Directors, at this same meeting on February 12, 2013,  
also decided that the various criteria used for determining the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable portion should be  
based, for up to 100% of the base salary, on economic parameters  
that refer to quantitative targets reflecting the Group’s performance  
Consequently, the amount of the variable portion of Mr. de Margerie’s  
compensation for fiscal year 2013 (paid in 2014) was 1,987,200,  
which corresponds 132.48% of his fixed annual compensation.  
(
with these economic parameters assessed on a linear basis between  
two levels of performance to avoid threshold effects) and, for up to  
0% of the base salary, on the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s  
8
In 2013, Mr. de Margerie also continued to have the use of a  
company car and be covered by a life insurance plan paid by  
the Company (see point 2.2.3. of this Chapter). These benefits  
were booked in the amount of 56,472 in the Consolidated  
Financial Statements at December 31, 2013.  
personal contribution, which allows a qualitative assessment of  
management based on six pre-determined, clearly defined criteria  
(each criterion can have a weighting of up to 13 to 15% of the base  
salary). For a detailed explanation of the criteria, see the summary  
table (annual variable compensation) in point 5 of this Chapter.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
143  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Compensation of the executive directors  
2
.3.2. Grant of performance shares  
granted. When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds a  
number of shares(1) corresponding to five times his gross annual  
fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement will be  
equal to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer met, the  
previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply. Given this  
holding requirement and given the share holding requirements that  
the Board of Directors impose on the executive directors whereby  
such directors must hold a number of shares of the Company  
equivalent in value to two years of the fixed portion of their annual  
compensation, and given the number of TOTAL shares and shares  
of the “Total Actionnariat France” collective investment fund  
or stock options in 2013  
Pursuant to the authorization of the Company’s Combined  
Shareholders’ Meeting of May 13, 2011 (eleventh resolution) and  
further to the proposal of the Compensation Committee, the Board  
of Directors decided, at its meeting on July 25, 2013, to grant Mr.  
de Margerie 53,000 outstanding performance shares of the  
Company (corresponding to 0.0022% of the share capital on the  
grant date). The shares were awarded as part of a broader share  
grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013  
related to 0.19% of the share capital for nearly 10,000 beneficiaries.  
(invested exclusively in TOTAL shares) effectively held by the  
The number of shares granted (53,000 performance shares) was  
stable compared to the previous year. As in 2012, no stock options  
were awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2013.  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors  
decided not to make the grant of performance shares contingent  
upon the purchase of a quantity of shares once the awarded  
shares become transferable, thus disregarding one of the  
recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF Code to which the  
Company adheres (for more detailed information, see Chapter 5,  
point 1.3.).  
The definitive grant of all the performance shares is subject to the  
beneficiary’s continued presence at the Group during the vesting  
period and to performance conditions related to the Group’s return  
on equity (ROE) and return on average capital employed (ROACE)  
for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
Furthermore, the Board of Directors noted that, pursuant to the  
Board’s rules of procedure applicable to each director, the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer cannot hedge the shares of the Company  
and any financial instruments related to them, and has taken note  
of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s commitment to not  
use such hedging transactions, including on the performance  
shares awarded.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero  
if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and  
less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more  
than or equal to 16%.  
Subject to the specific provisions set out above, the grant of  
performance shares to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
is governed by the same provisions that apply to other beneficiaries  
of the performance share grant plan approved by the Board of  
Directors at its meeting on July 25, 2013. In particular, these provisions  
state that shares definitively awarded at the end of the 3-year  
vesting period will, following validation of the presence and  
performance conditions, be automatically registered on the first  
day of the 2-year holding period and will be non-transferable  
until the end of the holding period.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero  
if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7%  
and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE  
is more than or equal to 15%.  
2.3.3. Other forms of compensation due  
or granted for fiscal year 2013  
The ROE and ROACE values used to assess the performance  
conditions will be those published by the Group in the first quarters  
of 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively, based on the Group’s  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer did not benefit from any  
other forms of compensation due or granted for fiscal year 2013.  
The Board of Directors has not awarded any multi-year or deferred  
variable compensation or any extraordinary compensation for fiscal  
year 2013.  
Pursuant to the provisions of the French Commercial Code, the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold in  
registered form, for as long as he remains in office, 50% of the  
capital gains, net of tax and related contributions, on the shares  
It should also be noted that the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer does not receive directors’ fees as director of TOTAL S.A.  
or any other company of the Group.  
(1) Directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock.  
144  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Compensation of the executive directors  
6
2
.3.4. Summary tables (AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code AMF position-recommendations  
No. 2009-16)  
Summary of compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (AMF Table No. 2)  
Fiscal year ended December 31,  
2012  
2013  
Amount due  
for the  
fiscal year  
Amount paid  
during the  
Amount due  
for the  
fiscal year  
Amount paid  
during the  
fiscal year(  
a)  
fiscal year  
(a)  
()  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)  
Fixed compensation  
1,500,000  
1,500,000 1,500,000  
1,530,000 1,987,200  
1,500,000  
1,741,000  
Annual variable compensation  
Multi-year variable compensation  
Extraordinary compensation  
Directors’ fees  
1,741,000(b)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
In-kind benefits(c)  
7,409  
7,409  
56,472  
56,472  
Total  
3,248,409  
3,037,409  
3,543,672  
3,297,472  
(
a) Variable portion paid for prior fiscal year.  
(
b) The variable portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation is calculated by taking into account the Group’s return on equity, changes in earnings compared  
with those of the other major competing oil companies, and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution based on objective and, for the most part, operational  
target criteria. The variable portion paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2012 could reach a maximum amount of 165% of his base salary.  
The variable portion due for 2012, determined by the Board of Directors on February 12, 2013 based on attainment of the economic performance criteria and an assessment  
of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution, represents 116.11% of his base salary (i.e., 1,741,000 rounded down to the nearest thousand euros).  
c) Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car and is covered by a life insurance plan paid by the Company (see point 2.2.3. of this Chapter). For 2013, the benefit corresponding to the  
life insurance plan by which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is covered was itemized and estimated at 48,360.  
(
Summary of compensation, stock options and performance shares awarded to the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer (AMF Table No. 1)  
Fiscal year  
2012  
2013  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (since May 21, 2010)  
Compensation due in respect of the fiscal year ()(a) (detailed in AMF Table No. 2 above)  
Valuation of multi-year variable compensation awarded during the fiscal year ()  
Accounting valuation of the stock options awarded during the fiscal year ()(b)  
3,248,409 3,543,672  
-
-
(detailed in AMF Table No. 4 below)  
-
-
Number of options awarded  
-
-
Accounting valuation of performance shares awarded during the fiscal year ()(c)  
(detailed in AMF Table No. 6 below)  
1,664,730 1,729,920  
Number of performance shares awarded  
53,000  
53,000  
Total  
4,913,139  
5,273,592  
Note: The value action of options and performance shares awarded corresponds to a valuation performed in accordance with IFRS 2 (see Notes 1E and 25 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements) and not to any compensation actually received during the fiscal year. Entitlement to options and performance shares is subject to fulfillment of performance conditions  
assessed over a period of two or three years depending on the plans.  
(
(
a) Including in-kind benefits. Mr. de Margerie has the use of a company car and is covered by a life insurance plan paid by the Company (see point 2.2.3. of this Chapter).  
b) The valuation of options awarded is calculated on the day they were awarded using the Black-Scholes model based on the assumptions used for the Consolidated Financial  
Statements (see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(c) The valuation of performance shares awarded was calculated on the day they were awarded (see Note 1E to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
145  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Executive officers’ compensation  
Performance shares awarded in 2013 to each executive director by the issuer and by any Group company  
(Extract from AMF Table No. 6)  
Plan  
date  
and No.  
Number  
of shares  
awarded  
during  
Valuation  
of shares  
()(  
Acquisition  
Date of  
Performance  
condition  
date transferability  
a)  
fiscal year  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
2013 Plan  
07/25/2013  
53,000  
1,729,920 07/26/2016 07/26/2018  
For 50% of the shares,  
the condition is based on  
the Group’s average ROE  
in 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
For 50% of the shares,  
the condition is based  
on the Group’s average  
ROACE in 2013,  
2014 and 2015.  
(a) The valuation of performance shares was calculated on the day they were awarded, according to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Stock options awarded in 2013 to each executive director by the issuer and by any Group company  
AMF Table No. 4)  
(
Plan  
date  
and No.  
Nature  
of options  
(purchase or  
subscription)  
Valuation  
Number  
Exercise  
price  
Exercise  
period  
of options  
of options  
()( awarded during  
a)  
fiscal year  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
-
-
-
-
-
-
(a) According to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
3. Executive officers’ compensation  
In 2013, the aggregate amount paid directly or indirectly by the French and foreign Group companies as compensation to the executive  
officers(1) of TOTAL in office at December 31, 2013 (members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer) was 22.1 million (thirty  
individuals), including 9.3 million paid to the six members of the Executive Committee. Variable compensation accounted for 45% of the  
aggregate amount of 22.1 million paid to executive officers.  
The following individuals were executive officers of the Group at December 31, 2013 (thirty individuals at year-end 2013, compared with  
thirty-three at year-end 2012):  
Management Committee  
Treasurer  
Christophe de Margerie(2)  
Philippe Boisseau(3)  
Yves-Louis Darricarrère(3)  
Jean-Jacques Guilbaud(3)  
Patrick de La Chevardière(3)  
Patrick Pouyanné(3)  
Pierre Barbé  
Helle Kristoffersen  
Manoelle Lepoutre  
Benoît Luc  
Humbert de Wendel  
Jacques Maigné  
Jacques Marraud des Grottes  
Jean-François Minster  
Jean-Jacques Mosconi  
Momar Nguer  
Marc Blaizot  
Arnaud Breuillac  
Bernard Pinatel  
Olivier Cleret de Langavant  
Bertrand Deroubaix  
Isabelle Gaildraud  
Jacques-Emmanuel Saulnier  
Philippe Sauquet  
Jérôme Schmitt  
Peter Herbel  
Michel Hourcard  
Bernadette Spinoy  
François Viaud  
Jean-Marc Jaubert  
(
(
(
1) Executive officers who are not directors (with the exception of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).  
2) Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Committee.  
3) Member of the Executive Committee.  
146  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
4. Stock option and performance share grants policy  
4.1. General policy  
In addition to its policy to develop employee shareholding, TOTAL S.A.  
is also pursuing a policy to associate employees and executive  
officers with the Group’s future results. This policy consists in  
awarding free performance shares each year. TOTAL S.A. may  
also award stock options despite the fact that no plan has been  
put in place since September 14, 2011.  
Stock options have a term of eight years, with an exercise price set  
at the average of the closing TOTAL share prices on Euronext Paris  
during the twenty trading days prior to the grant date, without any  
discount. The exercise of the options is subject to a presence  
condition and performance conditions, based on the return on  
equity (ROE) of the Group, which vary depending on the plan and  
beneficiary category. As of 2011, all options granted are subject to  
performance conditions. For options that may be awarded pursuant  
to the authorization given by the Extraordinary Shareholders’  
Meeting of May 17, 2013 (11th resolution), performance conditions  
will be assessed over a minimum period of three consecutive fiscal  
years. For earlier option plans, and subject to the applicable presence  
and performance conditions being met, options may be exercised  
only at the end of an initial 2-year vesting period and the shares  
resulting from the exercise may only be disposed of at the end of a  
second 2-year holding period. Moreover, for the 2007 to 2011  
option plans, the shares resulting from the exercise of options by  
beneficiaries employed by non-French subsidiaries on the grant  
date may be disposed of or converted to bearer form at the end  
of the first 2-year vesting period.  
Stock options and performance share grants put in place by  
TOTAL S.A. concern only TOTAL shares. No options for or grants  
of performance shares of any of the Group’s listed subsidiaries  
are awarded by TOTAL S.A.  
All grants are approved by the Board of Directors, based on  
the proposal of the Compensation Committee. For each plan,  
the Compensation Committee recommends a list of beneficiaries,  
the conditions and the number of options or shares awarded to  
each beneficiary. The Board of Directors then gives final approval  
for this list and the grant conditions.  
Grants of performance shares under selective plans become  
definitive at the end of a vesting period which has been extended  
to three years for shares granted as of July 25, 2013. However,  
such grants only become definitive subject to a presence condition  
and a performance condition based on the Group’s return on equity  
Performance share and stock option grants to the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer are subject to a presence condition within  
the Group and specific performance conditions related to the Group’s  
return on equity (ROE) and return on average capital employed  
(ROACE) set by the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the  
Compensation Committee.  
(ROE). At the end of this vesting period, and provided that the  
conditions set are met, the performance shares are definitively  
awarded to the beneficiaries, who must then hold them for at least  
two years (holding period). For beneficiaries employed by  
non-French subsidiaries on the grant date, the vesting period  
for performance shares may be increased to four years; in such  
cases, there is no mandatory holding period. As of 2011, all  
performance shares granted to executive officers are subject to  
performance conditions.  
The award of performance shares or stock options is used to  
extend, based on individual performance assessments at the time  
of each plan, the Group-wide policy of developing employee  
shareholding.  
4.2. Follow up of the grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
4
.2.1. Stock options  
Pursuant to Article L. 225-185 of the French Commercial Code,  
the Board of Directors decided that, for the 2007 to 2011 share  
subscription option plans, the executive directors (the Chairman of  
the Board and the Chief Executive Officer, and then from May 21,  
2010 the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) would be required  
to hold in registered form, for as long as they remain in office, a  
number of TOTAL shares representing 50% of the capital gains,  
net of tax and related contributions, resulting from the exercise of  
stock options under these plans. When the executive directors hold  
a number of shares (directly or through collective investment funds  
invested in Company stock) corresponding to five times his gross  
annual fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement  
will be reduced to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer  
met, the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply.  
No stock options were awarded in 2012 or 2013.  
Until 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was awarded  
stock options as part of broader share grant plans approved by the  
Board of Directors for certain Group employees and executive officers.  
Subject to certain specific provisions set out below, options granted  
to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are governed by the  
same provisions that apply to other beneficiaries of grant plans.  
As of 2007, the Board of Directors has made the exercise of options  
awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer contingent upon  
a presence condition and performance conditions based on the  
Group’s ROE and ROACE. The conditions are set out below for the  
2010 and 2011 plans. The acquisition rate of performance-related  
options under the 2009, 2010 and 2011 plans was 100%. It had  
been 60% for the 2008 plan.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has undertaken not to  
hedge the shares of the Company and any financial instruments  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
147  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
related to them. This provision is now included in the rules  
of procedure of the Board of Directors.  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is  
more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100%  
if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.  
All the options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
and outstanding at December 31, 2013 represented 0.047%(1)  
of the potential share capital of the Company on that date.  
2010 share subscription option plan: the Board of Directors  
decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group is  
met, the number of options definitively granted to the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance  
conditions:  
2011 share subscription option plan: the Board of Directors  
decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group  
is met, the number of options definitively granted to the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two performance  
conditions:  
– For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance  
condition states that the final number of options granted is based  
on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate is  
equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%,  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more  
than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average  
ROE is more than or equal to 18%.  
For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance  
condition states that the final number of options granted is based  
on the average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is  
equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%,  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more  
than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average  
ROE is more than or equal to 18%.  
– For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance  
condition states that the final number of options granted is based  
on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. The acquisition rate is  
equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%,  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is  
more than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the  
average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.  
For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the performance  
condition states that the final number of options granted is based  
on the average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is  
equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%,  
Summary tables  
Follow up table of TOTAL stock options awarded to Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer of TOTAL S.A., outstanding in 2013  
2005 Plan  
2006 Plan  
2007 Plan  
2008 Plan  
2009 Plan  
2010 Plan  
2011 Plan  
Total  
Type of options  
Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription  
options options options options options options options  
Expiry date  
07/19/2013 07/18/2014 07/17/2015 10/09/2016 09/15/2017 09/14/2018 09/14/2019  
Exercise price ()(a)  
Options awarded by the Board(b)  
Adjustments related  
49.04  
50.60  
60.10  
42.90  
39.90  
38.20  
33.00  
160,000 1,290,000  
130,000  
160,000  
200,000  
200,000  
200,000  
240,000  
(c)  
to the spin-off of Arkema  
1,828  
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,828  
Outstanding options as of January 1, 2013  
Options awarded in 2013  
131,828  
160,000  
200,000  
176,667  
200,000  
240,000  
160,000 1,268,495  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Options exercised in 2013  
Options canceled in 2013  
(131,828)  
(131,828)  
Options outstanding  
as of December 31, 2013  
-
160,000  
200,000  
176,667  
200,000  
240,000  
160,000  
1,136,667  
(
a) Exercise price as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under the plans in force on that date were multiplied by 0.25 to take into account the four-for-one  
stock split on May 18, 2006. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal  
to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices effective before May 24, 2006 are given in Note 25, point A to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Chapter 10).  
b) The number of options granted on or before May 23, 2006 was multiplied by four to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.  
c) Adjustments approved by the Board at its meeting on March 14, 2006 pursuant to the provisions in effect at the time of the Board meeting and of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006  
related to the spin-off of Arkema. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006, effective as of May 24, 2006.  
(
(
(1) Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares (see point 1.4. of Chapter 9).  
148  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
Stock options exercised in 2013 by each executive director (AMF Table No. 5)  
Plan  
Number of  
options exercised  
during fiscal year  
Exercise  
price  
date  
and No.  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
-
-
-
4
.2.2. Grant of performance shares  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero  
if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and  
less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more  
than or equal to 16%.  
Since 2011, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been  
awarded performance shares as part of the broader share grant  
plans approved by the Board of Directors for certain Group  
employees. Subject to certain specific provisions set out below,  
performance shares granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer are governed by the same provisions that apply to other  
beneficiaries of grant plans.  
– For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero  
if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7%  
and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE  
is more than or equal to 15%.  
In case of a definitive grant to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer of all the performance shares outstanding at December 31,  
2
013, these shares would represent 0.0044%(1) of the potential  
share capital of the Company on that date.  
As of 2011, the Board of Directors has made the definitive grant  
of performance shares to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
contingent upon specific presence and performance conditions  
as described below. As of 2013, these performance conditions are  
assessed over a 3-year vesting period.  
2
012 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided  
that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the  
number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
For performance share grant plans awarded to the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors decided that  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be required to hold  
in registered form, for as long as he remains in office, 50% of the  
capital gains, net of tax and contributions related to the shares granted  
under such plans. When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
holds a number of shares (directly or through collective investment  
funds invested in Company stock) corresponding to five times his  
gross annual fixed compensation at that time, this holding requirement  
will be equal to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer met,  
the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies linearly between  
0
1
% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 8% and less than  
6%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or  
equal to 16%.  
– For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7%  
and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE  
is more than or equal to 15%.  
Given this holding requirement and given the share holding  
requirements that the Board of Directors impose on the executive  
directors, the Board of Directors decided not to make the grant  
of performance shares contingent upon the purchase of a quantity  
of shares once the awarded shares become transferable, thus  
disregarding one of the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF  
Code to which the Company adheres (for more detailed information,  
see Chapter 5, point 1.3.).  
2
011 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has undertaken not to  
hedge the shares of the Company and any financial instruments  
related to them. This provision is now included in the rules of  
procedure of the Board of Directors.  
that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the  
number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies linearly between  
0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than 7% and less than  
18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or  
equal to 18%.  
2
013 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided  
that, provided the presence condition within the Group is met, the  
number of shares definitively granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
(1) Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares (see point 1.4. of Chapter 9).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
149  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to  
its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies linearly  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6%  
and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE  
is more than or equal to 15%.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was not awarded any  
performance shares under the 2006 to 2010 plans.  
Summary tables  
Follow up table of TOTAL performance shares awarded to Mr. de Margerie, Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of TOTAL S.A.  
2011 Plan  
2012 Plan  
2013 Plan  
Total  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Grant date  
05/13/2011 05/13/2011 05/13/2011  
09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
Closing price on grant date  
Average repurchase price per share paid by the Company  
32.690  
39.580  
36.120  
38.810  
40.005  
40.560  
Shares awarded by the Board  
Start of the vesting period  
Definitive grant date, subject to the conditions  
set out (end of the vesting period)  
16,000  
53,000  
53,000  
122,000  
16,000  
09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
09/15/2013 07/27/2014 07/26/2016  
09/15/2015 07/27/2016 07/26/2018  
Availability date (end of the mandatory holding period)  
Definitively granted in 2013  
16,000  
-
-
Performance shares awarded to each executive and non executive director in 2013 by the issuer and by  
any Group company (AMF Table No. 6)  
Plan  
date  
and No.  
Number  
of shares  
awarded  
during  
Valuation  
of shares  
()(  
Acquisition  
date  
Availability  
date  
Performance  
conditions  
a)  
fiscal year  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
2013 Plan  
07/25/2013  
53,000  
1,729,920 07/26/2016 07/26/2018  
For 50% of the shares,  
the condition is based on  
the Group’s average ROE  
in 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
For 50% of the shares,  
the condition is based on  
the Group’s average ROACE  
in 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
Charles Keller  
2013 Plan  
07/25/2013  
400  
13,056 07/26/2016 07/26/2018 Shares in excess of the first  
100 shares are subject  
Director representing  
employee shareholders  
since May 17, 2013  
to a condition based on  
the Group’s average ROE  
in 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
Claude Clément  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Director representing  
employee shareholders  
until May 17, 2013  
Total  
53,400  
1,742,976  
(a) The valuation of performance shares was calculated on the day they were awarded, according to the method used for the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
150  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
Performance shares that have become available for each executive and non executive director (AMF Table No. 7)  
Plan  
date  
and No.  
Number of shares  
that have become  
available during  
the fiscal year  
Vesting  
conditions  
Christophe de Margerie  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
-
-
150  
-
-
n/a  
n/a  
Charles Keller  
2009 Plan  
09/15/2009  
Director representing employee shareholders since May 17, 2013  
Claude Clément  
-
Director representing employee shareholders until May 17, 2013  
Total  
150  
4.3. Grants to employees  
4
.3.1. Share subscription option plan  
2012 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided  
that for executive officers(1) (other than the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted  
is contingent upon a presence condition and a performance  
condition. The performance condition states that the number of  
shares definitively awarded is based on the Group’s average ROE,  
as published by the Group according to its consolidated balance  
sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013.  
In 2013, as in 2012, the Board of Directors decided not to award  
any stock options.  
2011 share subscription option plan: the Board of Directors  
decided that, provided the presence condition within the Group  
is met, for each beneficiary other than the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer, options will be subject to a performance condition  
based on the Group’s average ROE, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of income  
for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.  
The acquisition rate:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is  
greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
The acquisition rate:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is  
greater than 7% and less than 18%; and  
– is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence  
condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more  
than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively  
granted subject to the above performance condition being met.  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.  
The acquisition rate applicable to the subscription options subject  
to the performance condition under the 2011 plan was 100%.  
2
011 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided  
4.3.2. Performance share plan  
that for executive officers(1) (other than the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted is  
contingent upon a presence condition and a performance condition.  
The performance condition states that the number of shares  
definitively awarded is based on the Group’s average ROE, as  
published by the Group according to its consolidated balance sheet  
and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.  
2
013 performance share plan: the Board of Directors decided that  
for executive officers(1) (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer), the definitive award of all shares granted is contingent upon  
a presence condition and a performance condition. The performance  
condition states that the number of shares definitively awarded is  
based on the Group’s average ROE, as published by the Group  
according to its consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
The acquisition rate:  
– is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is greater  
than 7% and less than 18%; and  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 18%.  
The acquisition rate:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
varies linearly between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is  
greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence  
condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more  
than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively  
granted subject to the above performance condition being met.  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, provided the presence  
condition within the Group is met, for each beneficiary (other than the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive officers) of more  
than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that number will be definitively  
granted subject to the above performance condition being met.  
The acquisition rate applicable to the shares subject to the  
performance condition under the 2011 plan was 100%.  
(1) The executive officers (aside from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) are employees who are not directors.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
151  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
4.4. Follow up of TOTAL stock option plans as of December 31, 2013  
4.4.1. Breakdown of TOTAL stock option grants by category of beneficiary  
The following table gives a breakdown of TOTAL stock options awarded by category of beneficiary (main executive officers, other executive  
officers and other employees) for each of the plans in effect during 2013 (for more information concerning the TOTAL stock option plans,  
see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements):  
Number of  
beneficiaries  
Number of  
notified  
Percentage  
Average  
number of  
options per  
options(  
a)  
(
a)  
beneficiary  
2
005 Plan: Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on July 19, 2005  
Exercise price: 198.90; discount: 0.0%  
Exercise price as of May 24, 2006: 49.04(a)  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
30  
330  
370,040  
574,140  
581,940  
24.3%  
37.6%  
38.1%  
12,335  
1,740  
246  
2,361  
Total  
2,721  
1,526,120  
100%  
561  
2
006 Plan: Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on July 18, 2006  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
28  
304  
1,447,000  
2,120,640  
2,159,600  
25.3%  
37.0%  
37.7%  
51,679  
6,976  
959  
Exercise price: 50.60; discount: 0.0%  
2,253  
Total  
2,585  
5,727,240  
100%  
2,216  
2
007 Plan: Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on July 17, 2007  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
27  
298  
1,329,360  
2,162,270  
2,335,600  
22.8%  
37.1%  
40.1%  
49,236  
7,256  
973  
Exercise price: 60.10; discount: 0.0%  
2,401  
Total  
2,726  
5,827,230  
100%  
2,138  
2
008 Plan(c): Subscription options  
Awarded on October 9, 2008, by decision  
of the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008  
Exercise price: 42.90; discount: 0.0%  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
26  
298  
1,227,500  
1,988,420  
1,233,890  
27.6%  
44.7%  
27.7%  
47,212  
6,673  
730  
1,690  
Total  
2,014  
4,449,810  
100%  
2,209  
2
009 Plan(c): Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on September 15, 2009  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
26  
284  
1,201,500  
1,825,540  
1,360,460  
27.4%  
41.6%  
31.0%  
46,212  
6,428  
781  
Exercise price: 39.90; discount: 0.0%  
1,742  
Total  
2,052  
4,387,500  
100%  
2,138  
2
010 Plan(c): Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2010  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
25  
282  
1,348,100  
2,047,600  
1,392,720  
28.2%  
42.8%  
29.0%  
53,924  
7,261  
778  
Exercise price: 38.20; discount: 0.0%  
1,790  
Total  
2,097  
4,788,420  
100%  
2,283  
2
011 Plan(c): Subscription options  
Decision of the Board on September 14, 2011  
Main executive officers(b)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees  
29  
177  
-
846,600  
672,240  
-
55.7%  
44.3%  
-
29,193  
3,798  
-
Exercise price: 33.00; discount: 0.0%  
Total  
206  
1,518,840  
100%  
7,373  
(
a) To take into account the spin-off of Arkema, pursuant to the provisions in effect on the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, at its meeting of March 14, 2006 the Board  
of Directors resolved to adjust the rights of TOTAL stock options holders. For each plan and each beneficiary, the exercise prices for TOTAL stock options were multiplied by an  
adjustment factor of 0.986147 and the number of unexercised stock options was multiplied by an adjustment factor of 1.014048 (and then rounded up), effective as of May 24, 2006.  
In addition, to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, the number of options awarded before May 23, 2006 was  
multiplied by four and the exercise price of these options was multiplied by 0.25. The presentation in this table of the number of notified options has not been adjusted to reflect the  
four-for-one stock split.  
(b) Members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer as of the date of the Board meeting awarding the options. Mr. Desmarest has not been a member of the Management  
Committee since February 14, 2007. Mr. Desmarest was awarded 110,000 options under the 2007 plan and no options since 2008.  
(c) The acquisition rate of performance condition-related shares was 60% for the 2008 plan and 100% for the 2009, 2010 and 2011 plans.  
152  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
For the 2007, 2008 and 2009 share subscription option plans, the Board of Directors decided that for each beneficiary of more than 25,000  
options, one-third of the options awarded in excess of that number should be subject to a performance condition.  
For the 2010 share subscription option plan, a portion of the options granted to beneficiaries of more than 3,000 options are subject to a  
performance condition. For the 2011 share subscription option plan, all of the options are subject to a performance condition.  
In 2013, as in 2012, the Board of Directors decided not to award any stock options.  
4.4.2. Historic overview of outstanding TOTAL stock option plans  
Past awards of subscription or purchase options - Information on the subscription or purchase options  
AMF Table No. 8)  
(
2005 Plan  
2006 Plan  
2007 Plan  
2008 Plan  
2009 Plan  
2010 Plan  
2011 Plan  
Total  
Type of options  
Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription Subscription  
options options options options options options options  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
05/14/2004 05/14/2004 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/21/2010 05/21/2010  
Date of Board  
meeting/grant date(  
a)  
07/19/2005 07/18/2006 07/17/2007 10/09/2008 09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011  
Total number of options awarded  
(b)  
by the Board, including  
Executive and non executive directors(c)  
:
6,104,480  
5,727,240  
5,937,230  
4,449,810  
4,387,620  
4,788,420 1,518,840 32,913,640  
240,000  
400,000  
310,000  
200,000  
200,000  
240,000  
160,000  
1,750,000  
C. de Margerie  
C. Keller  
C. Clément  
T. Desmarest  
n/a  
n/a  
n/a  
160,000  
n/a  
n/a  
240,000  
200,000  
n/a  
n/a  
110,000  
200,000  
200,000  
240,000  
160,000  
1,160,000  
n/a  
n/a  
-
n/a  
n/a  
-
n/a  
-
-
n/a  
-
-
-
-
240,000  
590,000  
Additional grants  
134,400  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
134,400  
Adjustments related  
to the spin-off of Arkema(d)  
90,280  
-
-
-
-
-
90,280  
Date as of which the options  
may be exercised:  
07/20/2007 07/19/2008 07/18/2009 10/10/2010 09/16/2011 09/15/2012 09/15/2013  
Expiry date  
07/19/2013 07/18/2014 07/17/2015 10/09/2016 09/15/2017 09/14/2018 09/14/2019  
Exercise price (in )(e)  
49.04  
50.60  
60.10  
42.90  
39.90  
38.20  
33.00  
Cumulative number of options  
exercised as of December 31, 2013  
39,127  
8,620  
-
112,740  
117,872  
365,722  
32,520  
159,371  
91,197  
373,346  
4,400  
1,058,926  
6,723,281  
Cumulative number of options  
canceled as of December 31, 2013  
6,290,033  
97,994  
89,265  
Number of options:  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
Awarded in 2013  
6,160,020  
-
(6,159,390)  
(630)  
5,621,526  
5,848,985  
4,330,468  
-
(360)  
(110,910)  
4,334,900  
-
(1,080)  
(344,442)  
4,661,443 1,505,040 32,462,382  
-
(900)  
-
-
(1,020)  
-
-
(720)  
-
-
-
(6,163,470)  
(942,799)  
Canceled in 2013(  
f)  
Exercised in 2013  
(122,871)  
(363,946)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
5,620,626  
5,847,965  
4,219,198  
3,989,378  
4,537,852 1,141,094 25,356,113  
(
(
(
(
a) The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options, except for the share subscription option plan of October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.  
b) To take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholder’s Meeting of May 12, 2006, the number of options awarded before May 23, 2006 has been multiplied by four.  
c) List of executive and non executive directors who had this status during the fiscal year 2013.  
d) To take into account the spin-off of Arkema, at its meeting of March 14, 2006 the Board of Directors resolved to adjust the rights of TOTAL stock options holders, pursuant to the  
provisions in effect on the date of its meeting and at the time of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006. These adjustments were made on May 22, 2006, effective as of May 24, 2006.  
e) The exercise price is the average closing price of TOTAL’s share on Euronext Paris during the twenty trading days prior to the grant date, without any discount.  
Exercise price as of May 24, 2006. To take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006, the exercise prices of options granted  
before May 23, 2006 were multiplied by 0.25. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise prices of TOTAL stock options under these plans were multiplied by an  
adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006. The exercise prices applicable before May 24, 2006 are indicated in Note 25, point A to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements (Chapter 10).  
(
(f) Of the 6,163,470 options canceled in 2013, 6,158,662 unexercised options expired on July 19, 2013 due to the expiration of the 2005 subscription option plan.  
In the event of the exercise all share subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 2013, the corresponding shares would represent  
.05%(1) of the Company’s potential share capital on that date.  
1
(1) Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares (see point 1.4. “Potential capital” of Chapter 9).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
153  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
4
.4.3. Stock options awarded to the ten employees (other than executive or non executive  
directors) receiving the largest number of options/Stock options exercised by the ten  
employees (other than executive or non executive directors) exercising the largest number  
of options (AMF Table No. 9)  
Total number  
of options  
awarded/  
Average  
weighted  
exercise  
price ()  
2008 Plan(  
10/09/2008  
2009 Plan  
09/15/2009  
2010 Plan  
09/14/2010  
2011 Plan  
09/14/2011  
a)  
exercised  
Options awarded in 2013 by TOTAL S.A.  
and its affiliates(b) to the ten TOTAL S.A.  
employees (other than executive or  
non executive directors) receiving the largest  
number of options (aggregate - not individual information)  
Options held on TOTAL S.A. and its affiliates(b)  
and exercised in 2013 by the ten TOTAL S.A.  
employees (other than executive or  
-
-
-
-
-
-
non executive directors) with the largest number  
of options purchased or subscribed  
(aggregate - not individual information)  
248,142  
35.43  
18,600  
45,200  
20,500  
163,842  
(
(
a) The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the options, except for the share subscription option plan of October 9, 2008, approved by the Board on September 9, 2008.  
b) Pursuant to the conditions of Article L. 225-180 of the French Commercial Code.  
154  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
4.5. Follow up of TOTAL performance share grants as of December 31, 2013  
4.5.1. Breakdown of TOTAL performance share grants by category of beneficiary  
The following table gives a breakdown of TOTAL performance share grants by category of beneficiary (main executive officers, other executive  
officers and other employees):  
Number of  
beneficiaries  
Number of  
notified  
Percentage  
Average  
number of  
shares per  
beneficiary  
shares(  
a)  
2
009 Plan(b)  
Decision of the Board  
Main executive officers(c)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees(d)  
25  
284  
48,700  
329,912  
1.6%  
11.1%  
87.3%  
1,948  
1,162  
268  
on September 15, 2009  
9,693  
2,593,406  
Total  
10,002  
2,972,018  
100%  
297  
2
010 Plan(b) (e)  
Decision of the Board  
Main executive officers(c)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees(d)  
24  
283  
46,780  
343,080  
1.6%  
11.4%  
87.0%  
1,949  
1,212  
260  
on September 14, 2010  
10,074  
2,620,151  
Total  
10,381  
3,010,011  
100%  
290  
2
011 Plan(b)  
Decision of the Board  
Main executive officers(c)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees(d)  
29  
274  
184,900  
624,000  
5.1%  
17.1%  
77.8%  
6,376  
2,277  
294  
on September 14, 2011  
9,658  
2,840,870  
Total  
9,961  
3,649,770  
100%  
366  
2
012 Plan  
Decision of the Board  
on July 26, 2012  
Main executive officers(c)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees(d)  
33  
274  
416,100  
873,000  
9.7%  
20.3%  
70.0%  
12,609  
3,186  
310  
9,698  
3,006,830  
Total  
10,005  
4,295,930  
100%  
429  
2
013 Plan  
Decision of the Board  
on July 25, 2013  
Main executive officers(c)  
Other executive officers  
Other employees(d)  
32  
277  
422,600  
934,500  
9.5%  
20.9%  
69.6%  
13,206  
3,374  
323  
9,625  
3,107,100  
Total  
9,934  
4,464,200  
100%  
449  
(
(
(
a) The number of notified performance shares shown in this table has not been adjusted to take into account the four-for-one stock split approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 12, 2006.  
b) For the 2009, 2010 and 2011 plans, the acquisition rate of the performance-related shares awarded was 100%.  
c) Members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer as of the date of the Board meeting granting the performance shares. The executive directors were not awarded any  
performance shares, with the exception of the 2011, 2012 and 2013 plans. The Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. decided to award Mr. de Margerie 16,000 performance shares under  
the 2011 plan, 53,000 performance shares under the 2012 plan and 53,000 performance shares under the 2013 plan.  
(
d) Mr. Clément, an employee of Total Raffinage-Chimie (subsidiary of TOTAL S.A.) and director of TOTAL S.A. who represented employee shareholders until May 17, 2013, was awarded  
240 performance shares under the 2010 plan, 240 shares under the 2011 plan and 260 shares under the 2012 plan. Mr. Keller, an employee of TOTAL S.A. and director of TOTAL S.A.  
who has represented employee shareholders since May 17, 2013, was awarded 400 performance shares under the 2013 plan.  
e) Excluding shares granted under the 2010 global free share plan.  
(
These performance shares, which were previously bought back by the Company on the market, are definitively awarded at the end  
of a 2-year vesting period. For the 2013 plan, the vesting period has been extended to three years. This definitive grant is subject  
to a presence condition and a performance condition (see point 4.3.2. of this chapter). Moreover, the disposal of performance shares  
that have been definitively awarded cannot occur until the end of a 2-year mandatory holding period.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
155  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
4.5.2. Historic overview of TOTAL performance share plans  
Past award of TOTAL performance shares - Information on granted performance shares (AMF Table No. 10)  
2009 Plan  
2010 Plan  
2011 Plan  
2012 Plan  
2013 Plan  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/13/2011 05/13/2011 05/13/2011  
09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
Date of Board meeting/grant date  
Closing price on grant date  
41.615  
38.540  
2,972,018  
-
39.425  
39.110  
3,010,011  
240  
32.690  
39.580  
3,649,770  
16,240  
36.120  
38.810  
40.005  
40.560  
Average repurchase price per share paid by the Company  
Total number of performance shares awarded, including to:  
Executive and non executive directors (a)  
4,295,930 4,464,200  
53,260  
53,400  
C. de Margerie  
C. Keller  
C. Clément  
-
n/a  
n/a  
-
n/a  
240  
16,000  
n/a  
240  
53,000  
n/a  
260  
53,000  
400  
-
Start of the vesting period  
09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
Definitive grant date, subject to the conditions set out  
(
end of the vesting period)  
09/16/2011 09/15/2012 09/15/2013 07/27/2014 07/26/2016  
09/16/2013 09/15/2014 09/15/2015 07/27/2016 07/26/2018  
Disposal possible from (end of the mandatory holding period)  
Number of performance shares:  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
Notified in 2013  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,605,806  
-
(14,970)  
(3,590,836)  
4,295,930  
-
(17,340)  
(180)  
-
4,464,200  
(3,810)  
-
Canceled in 2013  
(b)  
Definitively awarded in 2013  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
-
4,278,410  
4,460,390  
(
(
a) List of executive and non executive directors who had this status during the fiscal year 2013.  
b) Definitive grants following the death of their beneficiaries (2012 plan for fiscal year 2013).  
In case of a definitive grant of all the performance shares outstanding at December 31, 2013, these shares would represent 0.36%(1) of the  
potential share capital of the Company on that date.  
(1) Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares (see point 1.4. “Potential capital” of Chapter 9).  
156  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
6
TOTAL global free share plan  
2+2 structure, or four years without a holding period in countries  
with a 4+0 structure. Moreover, the granted shares are not subject  
to any performance condition.  
In addition to the restricted shares granted, on May 21, 2010 the  
Board of Directors decided to implement a global free share plan  
intended for all the Group’s employees, i.e., more than 100,000  
employees. On June 30, 2010, rights to 25 free shares were  
granted to every employee.  
At the end of the vesting period, the granted shares will become  
new shares resulting from a TOTAL S.A. capital increase by  
capitalization of reserves or issue premiums.  
The definitive grant is subject to a presence condition during the  
plan’s vesting period. Depending on the countries in which the  
Group’s companies are located, the vesting period is either two  
years followed by a 2-year holding period in countries with a  
On July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
acknowledged the creation and definitive grant of 1,366,950  
shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end the 2-year  
vesting period.  
2
010 Plan  
2010 Plan  
(4 + 0)  
Total  
(2 + 2)  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of Board meeting/grant date(a)  
Total number of shares awarded, including to:  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008  
06/30/2010 06/30/2010  
1,506,575  
1,070,650 2,577,225  
Executive and non executive directors(b)  
50  
-
50  
C. Keller  
C. Clément  
25  
25  
-
-
25  
25  
Definitive grant date (end of the vesting period)  
Disposal possible from  
07/01/2012 07/01/2014  
07/01/2014 07/01/2014  
Number of restricted shares  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011  
1,508,650  
1,070,575  
2,579,225  
Notified  
Canceled  
Definitively granted  
-
-
-
(83,800)  
(900)  
(29,175)  
(475)  
(54,625)  
(425)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
1,479,000  
1,015,525  
2,494,525  
Notified  
Canceled  
Definitively granted(c)  
-
(111,725)  
(1,367,275)  
-
-
(40,275)  
(152,000)  
(350) (1,367,625)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
-
974,900  
974,900  
Notified  
Canceled  
Definitively granted  
-
100  
(100)  
-
(101,150)  
(275)  
-
(101,050)  
(375)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
873,475  
873,475  
(
(
(
a) The June 30, 2010 grant was approved by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.  
b) List of executive and non executive directors who had this status during the fiscal year 2013.  
c) Definitive grant of 1,366,950 shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end of the 2-year vesting period.  
In case of a definitive grant of all the restricted shares outstanding at December 31, 2013, these shares would represent 0.036%(1) of the  
potential share capital of the Company on that date.  
(1) Based on a potential capital of 2,403,907,748 shares (see point 1.4. “Potential capital” of Chapter 9).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
157  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Stock options and performance share grants policy  
4
.5.3. Performance share grants to the ten employees (other than executive and non executive  
directors) receiving the largest number of performance shares  
Number of  
Grant  
date  
Definitive  
grant date  
(end of the  
vesting  
Availability  
date (end of  
holding  
performance  
shares notified/  
definitively  
period)  
awarded  
period)  
Performance share grants approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting  
on July 25, 2013 to the ten TOTAL S.A. employees (other than executive and  
non executive directors) receiving the largest number of performance shares(a)  
193,100 07/25/2013 07/26/2016 07/26/2018  
Performance shares definitively awarded in 2013, under the performance share  
grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2011, to the ten  
TOTAL S.A. employees (who were not executive and non executive directors  
at the time of the approval) receiving the largest number of performance shares(b)  
84,500 09/14/2011 09/15/2013 09/15/2015  
(
a) These shares will be definitively awarded at the end of a 3-year vesting period, i.e., on July 26, 2016, subject to a performance condition being met (see point 4.3.2. of this Chapter).  
Moreover, the disposal of shares that have been definitively awarded cannot occur until the end of a 2-year holding period, i.e., from July 26, 2018.  
b) This definitive grant is subject to a performance condition (see point 4.3.2. of this Chapter). The acquisition rate of the performance-related shares awarded was 100%. Moreover,  
the disposal of shares that have been definitively awarded cannot occur until the end of a 2-year holding period, i.e., from September 15, 2015.  
(
158  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
6
5
. Summary table of compensation elements due or  
granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
for fiscal year 2013, as submitted to the  
Shareholder’s Meeting for advisory vote  
The table below summarizes the compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 by  
the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the Compensation Committee, and submitted to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014  
for advisory vote, in compliance with the recommendation of t the AFEP-MEDEF Code (point 24.3).  
Summary table of compensation elements  
Compensation  
elements  
Amount or accounting  
valuation submitted  
for vote  
Presentation  
Compensation elements due or granted for fiscal year 2013  
At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the  
Fixed compensation  
1,500,000  
amount paid in 2013)  
(
Compensation Committee, decided to maintain the fixed annual gross compensation  
of its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 at the amount of  
1,500,000, which has remained unchanged since May 21, 2010.  
Annual variable  
compensation  
1,987,200  
(amount paid in 2014)  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, on the proposal of the  
Compensation Committee, determined the amount of the variable portion of the  
compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 based  
on the attainment of the quantitative economic parameter targets and personal  
contribution objectives set for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer by the Board  
of Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013.  
At its meeting on February 12, 2013, the Board of Directors decided that the variable  
portion of the compensation to be paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
for fiscal year 2013 should be based on economic parameters that refer to quantitative  
targets reflecting the Group’s performance (for up to 100% of the base salary)  
and on the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution, which  
allows a qualitative assessment of management (for up to 80% of the base salary).  
The maximum amount of the variable portion that can be paid to the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 was set at 180% (instead of 165% in  
2012) of the base salary, based on practices at a reference sample of companies  
operating in the energy sectors.  
The economic parameters selected by the Board (up to 100% of the base salary) include:  
return on equity for up to 50% of the base salary;  
the Company’s results, in comparison with the results of the major competing oil  
companies, assessed by reference to the average growth over three years of two  
indicators, earnings per share and net income. Each indicator has a weighting of  
up to 25% of the base salary.  
The expected levels of attainment of the quantitative economic parameter targets set  
for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were clearly defined by the Board of  
Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s personal contribution (which can represent  
up to 80% of the base salary) was assessed according to the six criteria clearly  
defined by the Board of Directors at its meeting on February 12, 2013. These criteria  
include Health, Safety and Environment performance, measured mainly according to  
attainment of the annual Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) target, the increase in  
hydrocarbon production, the increase in hydrocarbon reserves, the performance of  
the Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments (including New Energies)  
assessed on the basis of the annual targets of these  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
159  
 
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Compensation  
elements  
Amount or accounting  
valuation submitted  
for vote  
Presentation  
Annual variable  
compensation  
segments, the success of strategic negotiations and Corporate Social Responsibility  
performance, which is measured in particular according to attainment of the CO2  
emissions and energy efficiency targets and the Group’s position in the rankings  
of non-financial rating agencies. Each criterion could have a weighting of up to 13  
to 15% of the base salary.  
(continued)  
At its meeting on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors, after reviewing the  
attainment of the economic parameters as well as the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer’s personal contribution for fiscal year 2013, set the variable portion of the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for fiscal year 2013 at 132.48%  
of his annual fixed compensation, i.e., 1, 987,200 (compared to 116.11%, i.e.,  
1,741,000 for fiscal year 2012). 77.48%% relates to the share for the different  
selected economic parameters and 55% to the share for the personal contribution  
of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer determined on the basis of a detailed  
evaluation of the six pre-determined, clearly defined criteria.  
Concerning the economic parameters, the return on equity of the Group was lower  
in 2013 than in 2012, but the Group’s performance, in comparison with its main  
competitors (in terms of earnings per share and net income), were considerably  
higher in 2013 than in 2012, which led to an increase of the part allocated for the  
different economic parameters compared to the previous fiscal year (77.48% of the  
fixed compensation for fiscal year 2013 compared to 64.11% for fiscal year 2012).  
Concerning the personal contribution, the Board of Directors consider that most  
of the objectives were achieved, particularly the targets in terms of Safety, Corporate  
Social Responsibility (CSR) and concerning the success of strategic negotiations  
in producing countries. The personal contribution was then set to 55% (against a  
maximum of 80%) for fiscal year 2013 compared to 52% (against a maximum of  
65%) for fiscal year 2012.  
Consequently, the amount of the variable portion of Mr. de Margerie’s compensation  
for fiscal year 2013 (paid in 2014) was 1,987,200, which corresponds 132.48%  
of his fixed annual compensation.  
Multi-year or  
deferred variable  
compensation  
Not applicable  
The Board of Directors has not awarded any multi-year or deferred  
variable compensation.  
Extraordinary  
compensation  
Not applicable  
Not applicable  
The Board of Directors has not awarded any extraordinary compensation.  
Directors’ fees  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive any directors’ fees.  
Stock options,  
performance shares  
1,729,920  
(accounting valuation)  
At its meeting on July 25, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors, on the proposal  
of the Compensation Committee, decided to award performance shares in the  
Company to Mr. Christophe de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
of TOTAL S.A., subject to the conditions set out below.  
(and all other forms  
of long-term  
compensation)  
These performance shares were awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer as part of a broader share grant plan approved by the Board of Directors on  
July 25, 2013 related to 0.19% of the capital for nearly 10,000 beneficiaries.  
Pursuant to the authorization of the Combined Shareholders’ Meeting of May 13, 2011  
(eleventh resolution), the Board of Directors decided to grant Mr. Christophe de  
Margerie 53,000 outstanding shares of the Company (corresponding to 0.0022%  
of the share capital).  
The definitive grant of all the shares is subject to the beneficiary’s continued presence  
at the group during the vesting period and to performance conditions related to the  
Group’s return on equity (ROE) and return on average capital employed (ROACE)  
for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
160  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
6
Compensation  
elements  
Amount or accounting  
valuation submitted  
for vote  
Presentation  
Stock options,  
performance shares  
For half the performance shares awarded, the number of shares definitively awarded  
to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will depend on the Group’s average  
return on equity (ROE). For the other half, the number of shares definitively awarded  
will depend on the Group’s return on average capital employed (ROACE). The ROE  
and ROACE values used to assess the performance conditions will be those  
published by the Group in the first quarters of 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively,  
based on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
(and all other forms  
of long-term  
compensation)  
(continued)  
Pursuant to the provisions of the French Commercial Code, the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be required to hold in registered form, for as long as he remains  
in office, 50% of the capital gains, net of tax and related contributions, on the shares  
granted. When the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds a number of shares(a)  
corresponding to five times his gross annual fixed compensation at that time,  
this percentage will be equal to 10%. If in the future this condition is no longer met,  
the previous 50% holding requirement will once again apply. Given this holding  
requirement and given the share holding requirements that the Board of Directors  
impose on the executive directors whereby such directors must hold a number of  
shares of the Company equivalent in value to two years of the fixed portion of their  
annual compensation, and given the number of TOTAL shares and shares of the  
“Total Actionnariat France” collective investment fund (invested exclusively in TOTAL  
shares) effectively held by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of  
Directors decided not to make the grant of performance shares contingent upon  
the purchase of a quantity of shares once the awarded shares become transferable.  
Furthermore, the Board of Directors noted that, pursuant to the Board’s rules of  
procedure applicable to each director, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
cannot hedge the shares of the Company and any financial instruments related to  
them, and has taken note of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s commitment  
to not use such transactions to hedge the performance shares awarded.  
Subject to the specific provisions set out above, the grant of performance shares  
to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is governed by the same provisions that  
apply to other beneficiaries of the performance share grant plan approved by the  
Board of Directors at its meeting on July 25, 2013. In particular, these provisions  
state that shares definitively awarded at the end of the 3-year vesting period will,  
following validation of the presence and performance conditions, be automatically  
registered on the first day of the 2-year holding period and will be non-transferable  
until the end of the holding period.  
Benefits for taking  
up position  
Not applicable  
Mr. Christophe de Margerie has been Chief Executive Office since February 13, 2007  
and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 21, 2010.  
Compensation elements due or granted for fiscal year 2013 that have already been submitted to a vote  
at the Shareholders’ Meeting by virtue of the procedure related to regulated agreements and commitments  
Valuation of in-kind  
benefits  
56,472  
(accounting valuation)  
In accordance with the decisions made by the Board of Directors on February 11,  
2009, confirmed by the Board of Directors’ decisions on February 9, 2012 and  
May 11, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is covered by a life insurance  
plan paid by the Company. This plan guarantees, upon death, a payment equal to  
two years’ gross compensation (fixed and variable portions), increased to three years  
in case of accidental death and, in the event of permanent disability due to an  
accident, a payment proportional to the degree of disability.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also has the use of a company car.  
(a) Directly or through collective investment funds invested in Company stock.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
161  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
6
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
Compensation  
elements  
Amount or accounting  
valuation submitted  
for vote  
Presentation  
Termination  
payment  
None  
If the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is removed from office or his term of office  
is not renewed by the Company, he is entitled to termination payment equal to two  
years’ gross annual compensation. The calculation will be based on the gross  
compensation (including both fixed and variable portions) of the 12-month period  
preceding the date of termination or non-renewal of his term of office.  
This termination payment will be paid in the event of a change of control or strategy.  
It will not be due in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct or if the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer leaves the Company of his own volition, accepts new  
responsibilities within the Group, or may claim full retirement benefits within a short  
time period.  
Pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code,  
this termination payment is contingent upon a performance condition which is  
considered to be fulfilled if at least two of the three criteria set out below are met:  
the average ROE (Return on Equity) over the three years preceding the year in  
which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 12%;  
the average ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed) over the three years  
preceding the year in which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires  
is at least 10%;  
TOTAL’s oil and gas production growth over the three years preceding the year in  
which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is greater than or equal to  
the average production growth rate of the four other major competing international  
oil companies: ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Chevron.  
Retirement benefit  
None  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is also entitled to a retirement benefit equal  
to that available to eligible members of the Group under the French National  
Collective Bargaining Agreement for the Petroleum Industry. This benefit amounts to  
25% of the gross annual compensation (fixed and variable portions) received during  
the 12-month period preceding the executive director’s retirement.  
Pursuant to Article L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, the commitment  
to pay a retirement benefit is contingent upon a performance condition which is  
considered to be fulfilled if at least two of the three criteria set out below are met:  
the average ROE (Return on Equity) over the three years preceding the year in  
which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 12%;  
the average ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed) over the three years  
preceding the year in which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is at  
least 10%;  
TOTAL’s oil and gas production growth over the three years preceding the year in  
which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer retires is greater than or equal to  
the average production growth rate of the four other major competing international  
oil companies: ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and Chevron.  
The retirement benefit cannot be combined with the termination payment described above.  
Non-compete  
compensation  
Not applicable  
None  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer does not receive any non-compete  
compensation.  
Supplementary  
pension plan  
Pursuant to applicable law, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is eligible for  
the basic French social security pension and for pension benefits under the ARRCO  
(
(
Association pour le Régime de Retraite Complémentaire des Salariés) and AGIRC  
Association Générale des Institutions de Retraite des Cadres) government-sponsored  
supplementary pension schemes.  
He also participates in the internal defined contribution pension plan, known as  
RECOSUP. This pension plan represented a booked expense to the Company in  
favor of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2013 of 2,222.  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also participates in a defined benefit  
supplementary pension plan set up and financed by the Company. This plan,  
for which management is outsourced, applies to all employees of the Group  
whose annual compensation is greater than eight times the ceiling for calculating  
French social security contributions (37,548 in 2014).  
162  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
Summary table of compensation elements due or granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
6
Compensation  
elements  
Amount or accounting  
valuation submitted  
for vote  
Presentation  
Supplementary  
pension plan  
None  
Compensation above this amount does not qualify as pensionable compensation  
under either government-sponsored or contractual pension schemes. To be eligible  
for this supplementary pension plan, participants must meet specific age and length  
of service (five years) criteria. They must also still be employed by the Company upon  
retirement, unless they retire due to disability or have taken early retirement at the  
Group’s initiative after the age of fifty-five.  
(continued)  
The plan provides participants with a pension equal to the sum of 1.8% of the portion  
of the reference compensation between eight and forty times the annual ceiling for  
calculating French social security contributions and 1% of the reference compensation  
between forty and sixty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security  
contributions, multiplied by the number of years of service (up to twenty years).  
The basis for the calculation of this supplementary plan is indexed to changes in  
the ARRCO pension point. The sum of the supplementary pension plan benefits  
and external pension plan benefits may not exceed 45% of the compensation used  
as the calculation basis. In the event this percentage is exceeded, the supplementary  
pension is reduced accordingly.  
The compensation taken into account to calculate the supplementary pension is the  
retiree’s last 3-year average gross compensation (fixed and variable portions).  
In the case of Mr. de Margerie, to date, the ceilings applicable for determining the  
amount of the retirement pension he may benefit from under the terms of this defined  
benefit supplementary pension plan have been reached, both in terms of seniority  
(Mr. de Margerie joined the Group in 1974) and compensation (his last 3-year average  
gross compensation is more than the threshold of sixty times the annual ceiling  
for calculating French social security contributions, i.e., 2,221,920 in 2013).  
The commitments made to him by TOTAL S.A. under the terms of the defined benefit  
supplementary pension plans and similar would, thus, as of December 31, 2013,  
represent a gross annual retirement pension estimated at 582,000, i.e., 17.96%  
of the gross annual compensation paid to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
in 2013 (fixed portion for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).  
The Group’s commitments related to these defined benefit supplementary pension  
plans and similar (including the retirement benefit) is outsourced to an insurance  
company for almost its entire amount, the not outsourced balance being evaluated  
on an annual basis and subject to an adjustment through a provision in the accounts.  
The amount of the Group’s commitments amount, as of December 31, 2013, to  
19.1 million for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (34.8 million for the  
executive and non executive directors (mandataires sociaux) participating in these  
plans including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer). These amounts represent  
the gross value of the Group’s commitments to these beneficiaries based on a statistical  
life expectancy, and include the additional tax contribution for an amount of 30% on  
pensions that exceed eight annual ceilings for Social Security, payable by the Company  
to the French administration in charge of collecting social security contributions  
(URSSAF) (i.e., 4.0 million for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and  
7.6 million for the concerned executive and non executive directors including the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).  
The sum of all the pension plans in which Mr. de Margerie participates would,  
as of December 31, 2013, represent a gross annual retirement pension estimated to  
718,500, i.e., 22.17% of his gross annual compensation paid in 2013 (fixed portion  
for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).  
In line with the principles used to determine the compensation of the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer as set out in the AFEP-MEDEF Code which the Company  
uses as a reference, the Board of Directors has taken account of the benefit conferred  
through participation in the pension plans when determining the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer’s compensation.  
Approval by  
the Shareholders’  
Meeting  
-
The commitments made to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer regarding  
pension and life insurance plans, retirement benefit and termination payment (in case  
of his removal from office or non-renewal of his term of office under the conditions set  
out above) were approved on February 9, 2012 by the Board of Directors and by  
the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
163  
164  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
12.  
Responsabilité sociale, environ-  
Social and environmental  
information  
nementale et sociétale  
7
Social and environmental  
information  
1.  
Social information  
166  
1.1.  
1.2.  
1.3.  
1.4.  
1.5.  
Group Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .166  
Organization of work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .168  
Dialogue with employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .169  
Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .169  
Equal opportunity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .170  
2.  
Safety, health and environment information  
172  
2.1.  
2.2.  
2.3.  
Occupational health and safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .173  
Environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .174  
Consumer health and safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .180  
3.  
Community development information  
180  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
3.4.  
3.5.  
3.6.  
Dialogue and involvement with stakeholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181  
Controlling the impact of the Group’s activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .183  
Optimizing the Group’s contribution to the socioeconomic development of host communities and countries . . . . . . . . . .184  
The access to energy program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186  
Partnerships and philanthropy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .187  
Fair operating practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .188  
4.  
Other social, community development and environmental information  
190  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
4.4.  
TOTAL and oil sands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .190  
TOTAL and shale gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .191  
TOTAL and the Arctic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .191  
TOTAL and Western Sahara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .191  
5.  
Reporting scopes and method  
192  
5.1.  
5.2.  
5.3.  
5.4.  
Reporting Guidance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192  
Scopes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192  
Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .193  
Details of certain indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .193  
6.  
Third party assurance report  
195  
6
6
.1.  
.2.  
Attestation of presence of CSR Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .195  
Limited assurance on CSR Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .196  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
165  
Social and environmental information  
7
Social information  
TOTAL puts Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) at the heart  
of its activities and adheres to the following principles:  
TOTAL refers to the IPIECA (the global oil and gas industry  
association for environmental and social issues) reporting guidance  
specific to the industry and to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).  
More details on these reporting frameworks can be found on the  
Group’s website (csr-analysts.total.com).  
to protect the safety of people and its facilities;  
to limit its environmental footprint;  
to ensure that its Code of Conduct is applied to all of its  
activities;  
TOTAL’s CSR performance is measured by non-financial rating  
agencies. TOTAL has been included continuously in the FTSE4Good  
index (London Stock Exchange) since 2001, in the French agency  
Vigeo’s ASPI index (Advanced Sustainability Performance Index)  
since 2004, and in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes  
(DJSI – New York stock exchange): in 2013, TOTAL was listed in  
the DJSI World for the tenth consecutive year (TOTAL is the only  
major in this index since 2010); and TOTAL has also been listed in  
the DJSI Europe since 2005.  
to incorporate the challenges of Sustainable Development in  
the exercise of its activities;  
to increase its local integration by placing dialogue with its  
stakeholders at the heart of its policy and contributing to the  
economic and social development of the regions where the  
Group has operations; and  
to promote equal opportunities and foster diversity among its  
personnel.  
The Note on reporting scopes and method concerning the  
information in this Chapter is provided in point 5. of this chapter.  
1. Social information  
The quantitative information set out below regarding TOTAL’s employees worldwide relates to all the entities consolidated under the  
global integration method. Some of the data comes from the Worldwide Human Resources Survey (WHRS), which uses almost one hundred  
indicators measuring important factors of the Group’s employee policy. This annual survey is performed on a sample of employees from  
the consolidated companies, representative of their distribution by business segment and region; when such WHRS data is mentioned in  
this document, reference is made to this sample, which represents 90% of the Group’s headcount in 2013 (82% in 2012).  
1.1. Group Employees  
1
.1.1. Group Employees  
Group Employees  
as of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
as of December 31, 2013  
As of December 31, 2013, the Group had 98,799 employees  
belonging to 355 companies and subsidiaries located in  
Breakdown by region  
Mainland France  
French Overseas  
Departments and Territories  
Rest of Europe  
Africa  
North America  
South America  
Asia  
33.6%  
36.0%  
36.5%  
1
01 countries. The tables below show, at year-end 2011, 2012  
and 2013, the breakdown of employees by the following categories:  
gender, nationality, business segment, region, and age bracket.  
0.4%  
23.4%  
10.0%  
6.6%  
9.6%  
14.6%  
1.3%  
0.4%  
23.5%  
9.6%  
6.4%  
8.9%  
13.2%  
1.3%  
0.5%  
0.4%  
23.4%  
9.6%  
6.8%  
7.5%  
14.1%  
1.1%  
0.6%  
Group Employees  
as of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total number of employees  
98,799  
97,126  
96,104  
Middle East  
Oceania  
Women  
Men  
French  
Other nationalities  
30.8%  
69.2%  
33.4%  
66.6%  
30.0%  
70.0%  
35.6%  
64.4%  
29.7%  
70.3%  
36.1%  
63.9%  
0.5%  
Breakdown by age bracket  
< 25  
6.5%  
29.1%  
28.8%  
23.1%  
12.5%  
5.7%  
29.2%  
28.5%  
23.7%  
12.9%  
5.9%  
30.0%  
28.1%  
24.0%  
12.0%  
25 to 34  
35 to 44  
45 to 54  
Breakdown by business segment  
Upstream  
Exploration & Production  
Gas & Power  
17.1%  
1.1%  
16.9%  
1.7%  
16.7%  
1.7%  
>
55  
Refining & Chemicals  
Refining & Chemicals  
Trading & Shipping  
Marketing & Services  
Marketing & Services  
New Energies  
Between 2012 and 2013, the workforce increased by 1.7%.  
At year-end 2013, the country with the most employees  
after France was the United States, followed by China, Mexico  
and Germany.  
51.5%  
0.6%  
52.5%  
0.6%  
51.9%  
0.5%  
21.5%  
6.7%  
1.5%  
21.6%  
5.2%  
1.5%  
21.6%  
6.2%  
1.5%  
Corporate  
166  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Social information  
7
The breakdown by gender and nationality of managers or equivalent positions ( 300 Hay points) is as follows:  
Breakdown of managers or equivalent as of December 31,  
Total number of managers  
2013  
2012  
2011  
28,527  
27,639  
26,836  
Women  
Men  
French  
Other nationalities  
23.9%  
76.1%  
39.1%  
60.9%  
23.5%  
76.5%  
40.7%  
59.3%  
23.1%  
76.9%  
41.1%  
58.9%  
In 2013, the Worldwide Human Resources Survey covered 88,653 employees belonging to 149 subsidiaries.  
Group included in WHRS  
Employees surveyed  
2013  
2012  
80,003  
82%  
2011  
73,654  
77%  
88,653  
%
of Group employees  
90%  
1.1.2. Employees joining and leaving TOTAL  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total number hired on open-ended contracts  
10,649  
9,787  
9,295  
Women  
Men  
French  
Other nationalities  
35.9%  
64.1%  
10%  
31.0%  
69.0%  
11.8%  
88.2%  
29.4%  
70.6%  
12.8%  
87.2%  
90%  
The number of employees hired under open-ended contracts in 2013 in the consolidated companies increased by 8.8% compared with 2012.  
The regions in which the largest number of employees under open-ended contracts were hired were Latin America (30.5%), followed by Asia  
(26.7%) and Europe (25.1%), and the business segment that hired most was Refining & Chemicals (49.1%).  
The consolidated Group companies also hired 4,326 employees on fixed-term contracts. Over 600,000 job applications were received by  
the subsidiaries covered by the WHRS.  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Departures excluding retirement/transfers/early retirement/  
voluntary departures and expiry of short-term contracts  
6,779  
8,324  
6,892  
Death  
Resignations  
Redundancies/negotiated departures(a)  
Negotiated departures (France)  
106  
4,040  
2,495  
138  
155  
4,946  
3,006  
217  
119  
4,332  
2,199  
242  
Total departures/total employees  
6.9%  
8.6%  
7.2%  
(a) The increase between 2011 and 2012 is principally due to the reduction of employees at SunPower (essentially in the Philippines).  
1
.1.3. Compensation  
with base salary supplements, such as bonuses or variable  
portions, to better acknowledge individual contribution. The trend  
is towards individualized remuneration by strengthening rewards  
for collective and individual performance.  
TOTAL’s approach to overall compensation (salary and employee  
benefits) is guided by the twin imperatives of external competitiveness,  
with salaries and social protection schemes positioned relative  
to local reference markets, and internal fairness. These shared  
principles are adapted in line with local factors such as labor laws,  
the economic context and the job market in the various countries  
where the Group operates.  
The HSE (Health, Safety and Environment) aspect is also  
taken into account when evaluating individual and collective  
performance. A policy is pursued that recognizes HSE performance  
by assessing the individual performance of managers and collective  
team performance. A portion of the managers’ variable compensation  
is based on the achievement of HSE targets set for each business  
segment. It may also include individual HSE objectives, for which  
achievement is assessed during the annual performance review.  
For the managers whose compensation includes a variable portion,  
HSE criteria can determine up to 10% of the variable portion.  
For all employees, the annual performance review also includes an  
Most of the subsidiaries that implement annual individual pay  
reviews attempt to position their compensation at least at the  
mid-point of the comparative external reference (market average).  
General and merit-based increases take place yearly. Group  
companies may also use tools that reward collective performance  
(for example, in France, incentives and profit-sharing), together  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
167  
Social and environmental information  
7
Social information  
HSE target determined with the line manager. In addition, the three-  
yearly profit-sharing agreement for 2012-2014 applying to the oil  
and petrochemicals perimeter(1) in France includes for the first time a  
component of remuneration that is conditional on reaching an  
HSE target assessed per the business segment.  
The Group regularly invites its employees to subscribe to capital  
increases reserved for employees, the latest of which was launched  
in 2013. During this operation, 28,000 employees in 96 countries  
decided to subscribe to this capital increase, which, in addition to  
a conventional scheme, offered a scheme securing the employee’s  
investment with a guaranteed minimum return.  
Moreover, 93% of the employees in the scope of the 2013 WHRS  
are employed in countries where the law guarantees a minimum  
wage. In the absence of legislation for the remaining 7%, the Group,  
at the very least, complies with the local agreements on pay (company  
agreements or collective conventions) or builds its own structure.  
The minimum compensation is always set in accordance with the  
above policy, which is based on external benchmarks, thereby  
guaranteeing compensation above the locally applicable minimum.  
Moreover, TOTAL places the development of employee savings,  
wherever possible, at the heart of its Human Resources policy.  
For more detailed information, see point 5. of Chapter 5 of this  
Registration Document.  
The pension and employee benefit programs in the Group’s  
subsidiaries are improved every year (health insurance, life insurance).  
Since 2011, such improvements include the gradual introduction  
of a supplementary pension scheme in certain subsidiaries of  
Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services and the benchmarking  
and introduction of supplementary health and life insurance programs  
in eight Asian countries and for all employees in the Mexican  
subsidiaries in 2013. Additional improvements were made in 2013  
in other countries regarding the death benefit. A life insurance  
program paying a minimum of two years’ salary in case of death,  
regardless of the cause, has been set up in a large majority of  
Group companies. As a result of significant changes in the scope  
under review (sale of large companies and integration of new,  
created or acquired companies), As a result of significant changes  
in the scope under review (sale of large companies and integration  
of new, created or acquired companies), the level of coverage  
under this program at year-end was 86% of the workforce  
included in the 2013 WHRS.  
The development of employee shareholding is another cornerstone  
of the Group’s compensation policy. It is used to foster a good  
understanding of the Company’s core values and to create a direct  
link with company performance. TOTAL thus grants performance  
shares to a significant number of employees (about 10,000)  
on the basis of the Group’s achievement of overall economic goals  
(see point 4. of Chapter 6).  
In July 2013, the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A. approved a  
performance share plan. This is the ninth plan implemented by  
the Group since the granting of free shares to employees has been  
permitted by French law and it ensures a significant replenishment  
rate with 39% of employees who were not beneficiaries the  
previous year.  
1.2. Organization of work  
The average work week is determined by applicable local law. It is less than forty hours in most of the subsidiaries in Europe and Japan, and  
0 hours in most of the Asian and African countries. It is longer in the United States and India.  
4
Depending on current local law, there are several programs that aim to create a better balance between work and private life and/or to  
encourage equal career opportunities. In France, teleworking was introduced in 2012. As of December 31, 2013, there were 255  
teleworkers in the oil and petrochemicals perimeter(1), 45% of whom were managers and 30% men.  
WHRS 2013 WHRS 2012 WHRS 2011  
%
%
%
%
of companies offering the option of working part-time  
of employees working part-time of those given the option  
of companies offering the option of teleworking  
63%(a)  
5.2%  
22%  
69%  
5%  
19%  
2%  
63%  
5%  
15%  
3%  
of employees involved in teleworking of those given the option  
2.3%  
(a) The reduction in this percentage from 2012 to 2013 is due to the difference in the scope of the WHRS.  
The sickness absenteeism rate is one of the indicators monitored in the WHRS:  
Sickness absenteeism rate  
WHRS 2013 WHRS 2012 WHRS 2011  
2.5% 2.6% 2.7%  
(1) Including nine Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services companies in France.  
168  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Social information  
7
1.3. Dialogue with employees  
TOTAL’s employees and their representatives have a privileged  
position and role among the numerous stakeholders with which the  
Group has and intends to develop regular dialogue (see also point  
Organizational changes were carried out in the Group in 2013 in  
consultation with employee representatives and paved the way for  
a constructive social dialogue, leading to agreements such as the  
one on commitments in the context of the disposal of TIGF and the  
one relating to the mechanism of providing labor support measures  
for the future of the petrochemical platform in Carling.  
3
.1. of this Chapter). In countries where employee representation is  
not required by law, TOTAL strives to set up such representation  
for example in Myanmar and Nigeria). There are therefore employee  
(
representatives in the majority of Group companies, most of whom  
are elected. The subjects covered by dialogue with employees vary  
from company to company, but there are common major themes  
such as work time, health and safety, compensation, training and  
equal opportunity.  
In France, thirty-two agreements were signed with employee  
representatives in 2012, covering in particular retirement conditions,  
compensation systems, geographical relocations and teleworking.  
WHRS 2013 WHRS 2012 WHRS 2011  
Percentage of companies with employee representation  
Percentage of employees covered by collective agreements  
71.6%(a)  
67%  
79.9%  
67.7%  
77.4%  
70.3%  
(a) The reduction in this percentage from 2012 to 2013 is due to the differences in the scope of the WHRS.  
TOTAL continues to develop dialogue with employees on a European  
scale through negotiations with European trade union federations.  
proposed organizational change concerning at least two companies  
in two European countries, to express its opinion, in addition to the  
procedures initiated before the national representative bodies.  
Several agreements have been signed, including, for example,  
the convention on labor relations and equal opportunities that aims  
to set up a common social platform applicable to all the Group’s  
European entities.  
In addition, every other year TOTAL carries out an internal survey  
amongst its employees to gather their views and expectations  
with regard to their work situation and perception of the Company,  
locally and as a Group. The results of the survey conducted in 2013  
amongst 70% of the Group Employees show that they have a  
commitment rate of 73% and that 85% of them are proud to  
work for TOTAL.  
A single Work Committee representing European personnel has  
been set up at the Group-wide level in order to inform employees  
and hold discussions on the Group’s strategy, its social, economic  
and financial situation, as well as questions of Sustainable Development,  
CSR and safety on a European scale. It also examines any significant  
1.4. Training  
The Group has four priority goals in the field of training:  
total training budget of about 290 million (mentoring represents  
approximately 23%). Priorities for technical training or training that  
meets the specific needs of the activities are implemented by the  
operational business divisions in order to better meet the needs  
of the personnel.  
sharing TOTAL’s corporate values, in particular with respect  
to ethics and corporate HSE;  
increasing key skills in all business areas and maintaining  
a high level of operating performance;  
In 2013, the Group continued its effort to provide HSE training, with  
programs focusing on HSE Culture (see point 2.2.1.). This year also  
marked an acceleration in the development of managerial programs  
abroad, particularly to strengthen equal career opportunities in the  
Group. Moreover, TOTAL has continued the large-scale deployment  
of business-specific e-learning modules and programs on such  
cross-functional topics as diversity, compliance, competition law,  
the oil and gas chain, etc. In 2013, 33,000 people attended at least  
one module.  
promoting employees’ integration and career development through  
induction, management and personal development training;  
supporting the policy of diversity and mobility within the Group  
through language and intercultural training.  
The Group’s efforts in the field of training continued in 2013: 87%  
of employees followed at least one training course and, within the  
scope of the WHRS, 454,000 days of training were offered for a  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
169  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Social information  
Average number of days’ training/year per employee  
(
including mentoring, excluding e-learning)  
WHRS 2013 WHRS 2012 WHRS 2011  
5.2 5.5 5.8  
Group average  
By segment  
Upstream  
9.6  
8.9  
9.5  
Exploration & Production  
Gas & Power  
9.9  
2.4  
4.6  
4.6  
1.8  
3.4  
3.6  
2.7  
3.3  
9.2  
5.1  
4.9  
4.9  
1.9  
4.2  
4.7  
2.0  
2.9  
9.8  
5.3  
5.0  
5.0  
2.1  
4.4  
4.4  
6.2  
2.4  
Refining & Chemicals  
Refining & Chemicals  
Trading & Shipping  
Marketing & Services  
Marketing & Services  
New Energies  
Corporate  
By region  
Africa  
North America  
Latin America  
Asia-Pacific  
Europe  
Middle East  
Oceania  
9.4  
5.0  
6.9  
5.1  
4.1  
9.4  
2.6  
2.3  
9.2  
8.3  
4.1  
6.0  
4.6  
11.6  
3.4  
2.4  
8.3  
7.9  
6.2  
9.4  
4.5  
13.9  
1.5  
1.5  
French Overseas Departments and Territories  
Breakdown by type of training given (including mentoring, excluding e-learning)  
Technical  
Safety  
Language  
Other(a)  
41%  
25%  
12%  
22%  
42%  
27%  
11%  
20%  
42%  
29%  
8%  
21%  
(a) Other: management, personal development, intercultural.  
1.5. Equal opportunity  
TOTAL strives to offer equal opportunities to all its employees  
throughout their professional careers. An action plan was launched  
in 2004 to ensure that not only recruiters and career managers,  
but also business unit managers comply with the principle of equal  
opportunities.  
The Group intends to continue to foster gender diversity in all the  
Group’s professions and to enable women to gain access to all  
levels of responsibility on equal terms with their male counterparts.  
In this regard, the Diversity Council monitors the following indicators:  
%
of women  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Since 2004, the Group’s Diversity Council, chaired by a member  
of the Executive Committee, has been overseeing activities with a  
view to increasing the number of women employees, international  
employees and local employees up to the highest levels of  
management. Promoting diversity goes hand-in-hand with combating  
all forms of discrimination within the Group, whether in relation  
to openness to different social background, equal opportunities  
for men and women or the hiring and retaining of employees with  
disabilities.  
In recruitment on open-ended contracts 36%  
Employees in management  
31%  
29%  
recruitment/JL(1) 10  
29%  
31%  
27%  
30%  
24%  
16%  
28%  
30%  
23%  
15%  
Employees  
Employees in management/JL1(1) 10 24%  
Employees in senior management  
17%  
TOTAL also participates in the BoardWomen Partners program,  
which aims to significantly increase the proportion of women in the  
boards of large companies throughout Europe. Following the 2012  
Shareholders’ Meeting, 33% of TOTAL S.A.’s Board of Directors  
were women, compared with 26% before the meeting. Refer to  
point 1.1. of Chapter 5 for more details.  
1.5.1. Equal treatment for men and women  
In addition to the various collective agreements embodying its  
commitment to equal treatment of men and women, TOTAL signed  
in 2010 the Women’s Empowerment Principles – Equality Means  
Business (unglobalcompact.org), set out by the United Nations  
Global Compact.  
The Group also shows its commitment through agreements or  
provisions relating to access to employment, maternity and  
paternity leave, child care facilities, working conditions, balancing  
work and family responsibilities, and managing dual careers.  
(1) JL: the level of the job position according to the Hay method. The Hay method is a unique reference framework used to classify and assess jobs. JL10 corresponds to junior managers.  
170  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Social information  
7
In addition, the Group offers women the opportunity to share and  
discuss through TWICE (Total Women’s Initiative for Communication  
and Exchange), created in 2006 and restarted in 2009. The aim of  
this network is to promote career development for women in line  
with TOTAL’s gender diversity strategy. This initiative is currently in  
place in France and around the world (Germany, Angola, Belgium,  
Cameroon, Canada, China, Congo, United Arab Emirates, Gabon,  
Indonesia, Italy, Nigeria and Singapore) and has over 3,000 members.  
TWICE offers a mentoring program that supports women in their  
professional development by helping them better negotiate the key  
phases of their career, deepen their self-exploration and expand  
their network.  
1.5.3. Measures promoting the employment  
and integration of people with disabilities  
For over twenty years, TOTAL has set out its disability policy  
in France through successive agreements signed with employee  
representatives to promote the employment of workers  
with disabilities.  
While promoting the direct recruitment of disabled people and  
cooperation with the sector for disabled workers, TOTAL also  
takes various types of action:  
in-house: integration, professional training, job retention,  
advertising, awareness sessions organized for managers  
and teams, Human Resources managers, etc.  
1
.5.2. Internationalization of management  
externally: cooperation with recruitment agencies, information  
and advertising aimed at students, attendance at specialized  
recruitment forums, etc.  
With employees representing over 130 nationalities, TOTAL enjoys  
great cultural diversity, and it is important that this be reflected at all  
levels of the Company and across all business segments.  
In continuation of the work already undertaken, three new 3-year  
framework agreements (2013-2015) with the French representative  
unions set out TOTAL’s policy in France with regard to integrating  
people with disabilities into the work world.  
The Group’s companies recruit for a highly varied portfolio of business  
segments, usually with a large technical component, and strive to  
prioritize local recruitment.  
In 2013, 73% of managers recruited were non-French, representing  
more than eighty different nationalities. Several measures have  
been put in place so that the internationalization of management  
reflects this diversity, including harmonizing Human Resources  
practices (for example with regard to hiring and annual appraisals),  
increasing the number of foreign postings for non-French employees,  
and decentralizing training.  
1.5.4. Measures promoting non-discrimination  
and diversity  
In addition to basing its recruitment policy on the principle of  
non-discrimination, TOTAL is involved in a number of initiatives  
to promote diversity. In France, the Group is in particular a partner  
in the action taken by IMS-Entreprendre pour la Cité (Institut  
Mécénat-Solidarité), with a view to facilitating the integration of  
young graduates into the workplace.  
%
of non-French  
2013  
2012  
2011  
In recruitment on open-ended contracts 90%  
Employees in management  
88%  
87%  
The TOTAL Foundation also works alongside several associations  
that help young graduates from disadvantaged backgrounds to  
find jobs or support them in further education.  
recruitment/JL(1) 10  
73%  
67%  
61%  
26%  
71%  
64%  
59%  
25%  
75%  
64%  
59%  
23%  
Employees  
Employees in management/JL(1)10  
Employees in senior management  
(1) JL: the level of the job position according to the Hay method. The Hay method is a unique reference framework used to classify and assess jobs. JL10 corresponds to junior managers.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
171  
Social and environmental information  
7
Safety, health and environment information  
2. Safety, health and environment information  
TOTAL’s safety, health and environment policy is based on the charter below, which was adopted in 2000 and updated in 2009. This charter  
represents the common framework of the Group’s HSE and Quality management systems. Group directives define the minimum requirements  
expected in the different HSE areas and are implemented in the business segments, which subsequently factor in the specific characteristics  
of their operations. Recommendations, guides and manuals are regularly published and made available to the different business segments.  
They provide invaluable guidance and support for implementing and managing the Group’s policies.  
Safety Health Environment Quality Charter  
TOTAL has based its policy in matters pertaining to health, safety, the environment and quality on the following ten principles:  
Article 1  
TOTAL considers personal health and safety, operational safety, respect for the environment, customer satisfaction and listening to  
stakeholders as paramount priorities.  
Article 2  
TOTAL strives to comply with applicable laws and regulations wherever it conducts its business and supplements them, when appropriate,  
with its own specific requirements.  
Article 3  
TOTAL promotes among its employees a shared culture the core components of which are skills management, incident feedback, information  
and dialogue. This process is driven by the leadership and exemplary conduct of management.  
Article 4  
TOTAL favors the selection of its industrial and business partners on the basis of their ability to comply with its health, safety, environment  
and quality policy.  
Article 5  
TOTAL implements, for all its operations, appropriate management policies regarding health, safety, environment and quality risks which are regularly  
assessed. No project development or product launch may be undertaken without a risk assessment covering the entire life of the project or product.  
Article 6  
Appropriate health, safety, environment and quality management systems for each line of business undergo regular assessment involving  
measuring the performance, setting milestones, formulating relevant action plans and instituting suitable control procedures.  
Article 7  
In order to respond effectively in the event of accidents, TOTAL equips itself appropriately and establishes emergency procedures that are  
periodically reviewed and regularly tested during exercises.  
Article 8  
All employees, at all levels, must be aware of their role and personal responsibility in performing their duties, giving due consideration to the prevention  
of risks of accidents, harm to health, environmental damage or adverse impacts on product and service quality. Vigilance and professionalism in  
these fields are important criteria in evaluating the performance of each member of personnel, in particular for those in positions of responsibility.  
Article 9  
In matters of health, safety, environment and quality, TOTAL adopts a constructive attitude based on open dialogue with stakeholders and  
outside parties. Through its social commitment, it focuses on developing its business in harmony with the neighboring communities.  
Article 10  
TOTAL monitors and controls the Group’s energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, production of ultimate waste and impact  
on biodiversity. The Group develops new processes, products and customer services in order to enhance energy efficiency and reduce  
environmental footprints. The Group is engaged in research and development for additional energy resources. TOTAL thus actively  
contributes to Sustainable Development.  
The Industrial Safety department and the Sustainable Development and Environment department, together with the Security department,  
report to Corporate Affairs and provide support to the segments and ensure that they implement policies that reflect the principles of the  
charter in a concrete, effective manner.  
In accordance with oil and gas industry best practices (set out in the IPIECA reporting guidance), the following Health, Safety and Environment  
information relates to the activities, sites and industrial assets that TOTAL operates or for which it has been given contractual responsibility  
for managing operations, directly or through one of its subsidiaries. An exception is made for information concerning greenhouse gases,  
which is also expressed as a Group share of all assets in which TOTAL has a stake. The data presented in this section are provided on a  
current basis. For instance, data relating to SunPower, in which the Group holds a 64.65% interest, were taken into account from 2012.  
172  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Safety, health and environment information  
7
2.1. Occupational health and safety  
For many years now, the Group has been developing an HSE  
normative framework. In this respect, directives have been drawn  
up for occupational health and safety. These directives set out  
TOTAL’s requirements in these areas for personnel working on its  
sites. In 2013, the three business segments increased their efforts  
in terms of the reference frameworks of the HSE management  
systems in order to provide greater overall consistency, while at the  
same time respecting the businesses’ specific characteristics.  
and audits. Regular presentations and seminars are also  
organized with the employee representatives on the European  
Works Council to promote the golden rules.  
In 2013, a worldwide safety campaign was launched in connection  
with the World Day for Safety and Health at Work on the theme of  
commitment to safety: “TOTAL commitment for me, for you, for all”.  
This campaign, launched in eighteen languages, is expected to  
continue for several more years.  
Indicators are used to measure the main results in these areas and  
monthly reporting of occupational incidents is used to monitor  
performance at both the global and site level. The Group does not  
differentiate between the safety of its employees and that of external  
contractors. The indicators below include incidents and hours  
worked by Group Employees and contractors working on its sites.  
Moreover, the reporting of anomalies and near misses is strongly  
encouraged and monitored. The ability of each employee to identify  
anomalies or dangerous situations is a measure of the personnel’s  
involvement and vigilance in accident prevention, which also reflects  
the safety culture level. An investigation is generally launched in  
response to any type of accident whatsoever. The method and  
depth of investigation depend on the actual or potential severity  
level. For example, a near miss with a high severity potential level  
is treated in the same way as a severe incident: its analysis is  
considered to be a key driving force for progress and, depending  
on its relevance to the other business units or business segments  
within the Group, triggers a safety alert and even the dissemination  
of a feedback report.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
(a)  
LTIR : number of lost time incidents  
per million hours worked  
0.9  
1.6  
1.0  
1.8  
1.3  
2.2  
TRIR(b): number of recorded incidents  
per million hours worked  
(c)  
SIR : average number of days lost  
per lost time incident  
32.0  
27.2  
23.9  
The Group’s directives are equally demanding with regard to employee  
health. In particular, the Group’s companies are expected to prepare  
a formal occupational risk assessment (chemical, physical, biological,  
ergonomic or psychosocial), create a risk management action plan  
and ensure medical monitoring of staff in line with the risks to which  
they are exposed. Two main indicators are monitored yearly:  
(
(
(
a) LTIR: Lost Time Injury Rate.  
b) TRIR: Total Recordable Injury Rate.  
c) SIR: Severity Injury Rate.  
The severity injury rate increased in 2013 compared with the previous  
year. This was particularly apparent in the Upstream segment, where  
a single event led to the death of four people (see below) and an  
extended absence from work for fourteen other employees, and in  
Marketing & Services, where the inclusion in reporting for France of  
work carried out at service stations had a significant impact on the  
increase in the segment’s severity rate. In Refining & Chemicals,  
however, this indicator decreased slightly. The impact on the severity  
injury rate of the increase in the activities of Exploration & Production  
and security-related accidents, especially in Marketing & Services,  
is also being closely monitored.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Percentage of companies  
included in the Worldwide Human  
Resources Survey offering employees  
regular medical monitoring  
95%  
0.68  
98%  
0.86  
96%  
0.87  
Number of occupational illnesses  
recorded in the year  
(in accordance with local regulations)  
In 2013, the Group experienced eleven accidents that led to fifteen  
fatalities, including a tragic helicopter accident that resulted in the  
death of four contractors. This accident occurred in late August  
in the North Sea, off the coast of the Shetland Islands, when eighteen  
people were being carried from an offshore drilling rig by helicopter.  
An investigation is being conducted by the competent British  
authorities (AAIB).  
per million hours worked  
In 2013, there was an 18% decrease in recorded illnesses compared  
to 2012 with respect to the main occupational illnesses identified  
at TOTAL:  
Musculoskeletal disorders, the main cause of occupational illness,  
representing 42% of all recorded illnesses. This figure decreased  
by 12% compared with 2012 due to the implementation of a  
specific action plan to control risk and improve working conditions,  
particularly in Hutchinson’s operations;  
The number of fatalities per million hours worked (Fatality Incident  
Rate) calculated over a 3-year rolling basis, however, shows a  
downward trend: 0.030 in 2011; 0.025 in 2012; and 0.021 in 2013.  
Since 2010, the basic rules to be scrupulously followed by all  
personnel, employees and contractors alike, in all of the Group’s  
lines of business worldwide, have been set out in a safety document  
entitled “Safety at work: TOTAL’s golden rules”. According to the  
Group’s internal statistics, in more than 90% of severe incidents or  
near misses with high severity potential in the workplace, at least  
one of the golden rules had not been followed. The roll-out of the  
golden rules was accompanied by an awareness campaign in 2011  
and 2012 to ensure that all employees know and understand these  
rules. The proper application of these golden rules, and more generally  
of all occupational safety procedures, is verified through site visits  
– Illnesses related to asbestos exposure, which decreased by 33%  
compared with 2012, in line with the continuous decline over  
several years due to the absence of recent exposure;  
Illnesses related to noise exposure.  
In support of the Group’s policy on preventing occupational illnesses  
and to complement the periodic medical surveillance scheme  
currently in place, TOTAL set up an employee health observatory  
which is responsible for keeping track of any medical conditions  
potentially affecting employees and, if applicable, suggesting and  
overseeing the appropriate preventive actions. By the end of 2013,  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
173  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Safety, health and environment information  
thirteen of the Group’s sites in Europe had signed up for the  
observatory, which monitors approximately 10% of the Group’s  
employees.  
On a broader level, TOTAL is associated with promoting individual  
and collective health in the countries where it operates (including flu  
vaccination campaigns and prevention and screening programs for  
certain diseases, such as AIDS, cancer and malaria, for employees,  
their families and local communities). Awareness campaigns relating  
to lifestyle risks in particular have also been in place for several  
years (including, for example, anti-smoking and anti-drinking  
campaigns, musculoskeletal disorder prevention programs).  
At the same time, eight French sites give their employees a  
questionnaire to complete when they have periodic medical  
check-ups, which are used to measure the impact of the reaction  
to the stress factors to which they may be exposed.  
2.2. Environmental protection  
2
.2.1. General policy  
the future be responsible for one of the Group’s business units  
(
five sessions were held in 2013 with 221 participants). Lastly, the  
HSE for Executives” course focusing on management styles has  
The main Group entities have Health, Safety and Environment  
HSE) departments or units that ensure compliance with both  
(
been organized since 2012 for Group executives (five sessions  
were held in 2013 with 99 participants).  
relevant local regulations and internal requirements. In all, over 980  
full-time equivalent positions dedicated to environmental matters  
were identified within the Group in 2013.  
2
.2.2. Environmental footprint  
The Group steering bodies, led by the Sustainable Development  
and Environment department, have a threefold task:  
TOTAL implements an active policy of monitoring, managing and  
reducing the environmental footprint of its operations. As part of  
this policy, emissions are identified and quantified by environment  
monitoring TOTAL’s environmental performances, which are reviewed  
annually by the Management Committee and presented before  
the Executive Committee, for which multi-annual improvement  
targets are set;  
(water, air and soil) so that appropriate measures can be taken to  
better control them.  
in conjunction with the business segments, handling the various  
environment-related areas under their responsibility; and  
Water, air  
The Group’s operations generate chronic emissions, such as fumes  
at combustion plants, emissions into the atmosphere from the various  
conversion processes and discharges into wastewater. In addition  
to complying with applicable legislation, the Group’s companies  
actively pursue a policy aimed at reducing the amount of emissions.  
Sites use various treatment systems that include different types  
of measures:  
promoting the internal standards to be applied by the Group’s  
business units as set out in the charter.  
New objectives were set in the beginning of 2013 for the period  
up to 2017.  
In-house, TOTAL also promotes compliance of its environmental  
management systems with ISO 14001. In 2013, 314 sites operated  
by the Group were ISO 14001-certified (compared to 305 in 2012),  
out of a total of 858 operated sites. The objective for 2017 is to  
achieve certification for all production sites producing over 10 kt of  
Organizational measures (e.g., using predictive models for  
controlling peaks in SO emissions in accordance with weather  
forecast data, managing combustion processes).  
2
CO eq emissions per year. The policy of allowing new or recently  
– Technical measures (such as building wastewater treatment plants).  
These measures can be preventive to avoid generating pollutants  
2
acquired sites two years to achieve certification will continue to  
apply. At year-end 2013, 100% of the eighty-four sites meeting  
these conditions were ISO 14001 certified and one site that started  
up less than two years ago has scheduled its certification for 2014.  
(such as low NOx burners for combustion plants) or curative (such  
as biological treatment of processed water to reduce the hydrocarbon  
content of the final effluent).  
The environmental risks and impacts of any planned investment,  
disposal or acquisition subject to Executive Committee approval  
are assessed and reviewed before the final decision is made  
To ensure the quality of its wastewater discharge, TOTAL has set,  
for all of its offshore exploration and production operations, a target  
of complying with the hydrocarbon concentration requirements set  
out in the OSPAR standard (less than 30 mg/l), which is only mandatory  
in the North Sea. For the fifth consecutive applicable year, the Group  
achieved this goal on yearly average in 2013.  
(also refer to point 1.10. in Chapter 5).  
TOTAL ensures that all employees are aware of its environmental  
protection requirements. Employees are given training in the  
required skills. TOTAL also raises employee awareness through  
internal campaigns (e.g., in-house magazines, intranet, posters)  
and provides annual information about the Group’s environmental  
performance through circulation of the CSR report.  
In 2013, the Normandy platform (petrochemical plant) hosted  
E4WATER, a European research project aimed at developing  
tomorrow’s technologies that would permit recycling water based  
on a petrochemical pollution matrix. This involves testing seven  
pilot processes (sand filtration, ozonation for cooling, UV disinfection  
treatment, ozonation for waste water, bio-filtration, ultrafiltration and  
reverse osmosis) on two aqueous flows in the site: waste water and  
cooling water. These technologies are mature, but their combination  
on a petrochemical matrix is innovative. On completion of this  
project in 2015, the knowledge acquired will be used locally for a  
Two 3-day training courses on all aspects of HSE are also made  
available to the business units. “HSE Implementation” sessions are  
aimed at employees whose job is specifically to handle one or more  
HSE areas within a business unit (three sessions were held in 2013  
with seventy-eight participants). The training session “HSE for  
Managers” is aimed at senior managers who are currently or will in  
174  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Safety, health and environment information  
7
recycling project (40% reduction in withdrawal) or globally (recycling  
program for Exploration & Production and Refining & Chemicals  
segments). This project aims both to decrease the discharge of  
hazardous substances into the natural environment and to save natural  
resources by recycling water in the processes used by the Group.  
The table below shows changes in chronic emissions into the  
atmosphere (excluding greenhouse gas; see point 2.2.5.) and  
discharged water quality:  
2013  
2012  
2011  
SO2 emissions (thousands of metric tons)  
NOx emissions (thousands of metric tons)  
75  
91  
79  
88  
91  
84  
Hydrocarbons in discharged water (metric tons, onshore and coastal, excluding Specialty Chemicals)  
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) in water discharged by specialty chemicals (metric tons)  
306  
270  
437  
275  
380  
320  
The presentation of hydrocarbon discharges in effluents was changed  
in 2013 to obtain an indicator consistent with the target set by the  
Group (40% reduction in onshore and coastal hydrocarbon  
discharges between 2011 and 2017). In order to compare 2013  
performance with that of previous years, the concentration of  
hydrocarbons in water discharged by Exploration & Production was  
Decommissioned Group facilities (e.g., chemical plants, service  
stations, mud pits or lagoons resulting from hydrocarbon extraction  
operations, wasteland on the site of decommissioned refinery units)  
impact the landscape and may, despite all of the precautions taken,  
be sources of chronic or accidental pollution. TOTAL ensures that  
sites are remediated when it leaves in order to allow new operations  
to be set up once the future use of the land has been determined in  
agreement with the authorities. This continuous task is performed  
by various teams within the Group, some of which form subsidiaries,  
and has been governed by a “Polluted soil and site reclamation”  
policy since 2012.  
17 mg/l in 2013 compared to 23 mg/l in 2012 and 20 mg/l in 2011.  
The slight decrease in SO emissions between 2012 and 2013 was  
2
driven by the shutdown of the catalytic crackers at two refineries  
and the proper operational performance of the sulfur units at other  
refineries. In addition, the vast majority of the fuels used at the Group’s  
refineries are now gaseous, which have a much lower sulfur content  
than liquid fuels.  
Waste  
The Group’s companies are focused on controlling the waste produced  
at every stage in their operations. This commitment is based on the  
following four principles, listed in decreasing order of priority:  
In 2013, NOx emissions produced by Exploration & Production  
increased by 5 kt due to the increase in drilling activities, and therefore  
of diesel consumption, and decreased by 1.5 kt as a result of the  
sale of the Fertilizers business.  
1. reducing waste at source, by designing products and processes  
that generate as little waste as possible, as well as minimizing the  
quantity of waste produced by the Group’s operations;  
The amount of hydrocarbons discharged at the coasts and onshore  
has declined sharply due to the improved performance of oil terminals  
in the Gulf of Guinea, with the inflow of investments and with the  
operational management between offshore facilities and terminals.  
2. reusing products for a similar purpose in order to prevent them  
from becoming waste;  
3. recycling residual waste; and  
Below are the Group’s achievements at year-end 2013 based on  
the objectives set at the beginning of 2013:  
4. recovering energy, wherever possible, from non-recycled  
products.  
19% reduction in hydrocarbon discharges in water (onshore and  
coastal) since 2011 compared to the 40% target set for 2017;  
To this end, TOTAL has entered into a variety of partnerships:  
With Veolia, the Group is involved in the Osilub project, which  
culminated in the construction of a used motor oil recycling plant  
in Le Havre, France. The plant, of which TOTAL holds a 35%  
share, entered into production in 2012 and boasts a processing  
capacity of 120,000 t/y (50% of all the used motor oil collected in  
France); the recycled oil is used to make Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO)  
for refinery production of lubricants and fuels.  
24% reduction in SO emissions compared to 2010, that is,  
2
exceeding the target set for 2017 (-20%).  
Soil  
The risks of soil pollution related to TOTAL’s operations come mainly  
from accidental spills (refer to point 2.2.3. of this Chapter) and waste  
storage (see below). The Group’s approach to preventing and  
controlling these types of pollution is based on four cornerstones:  
– In 2011, Total Energy Ventures (the Group’s vehicle for investing  
mainly in new energy and environmental protection technologies)  
acquired a stake in Agilyx. This American startup has developed  
an innovative process to convert waste plastic into crude oil,  
for which it already has a unit in production.  
leak prevention, by implementing industry best practices in  
engineering, operations and transport;  
maintenance at appropriate intervals to minimize the risk of leaks;  
A Group directive issued in 2012 sets out the minimum requirements  
related to waste management. It is carried out in four basic stages:  
overall monitoring of the environment to identify any increase in  
soil pollution; and  
waste identification (technical and regulatory);  
controlling pollution from previous activities by means of  
containment or reduction operations.  
waste storage (soil protection and discharge management);  
waste traceability, from production through to disposal (e.g.,  
notes, logs, statements); and  
waste processing, with technical and regulatory knowledge of  
the relevant channels, under site responsibility.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
175  
Social and environmental information  
7
Safety, health and environment information  
TOTAL is especially committed to managing and treating waste  
classified as hazardous (depending on the type, waste is mainly  
processed outside the Group by specialized companies):  
or sensitivity of the natural environment affected) are reviewed on a  
monthly basis and annual statistics are sent to the Group’s  
Management Committee. All accidental spills are followed by a  
corrective action aimed at returning the environment to its original  
state as quickly as possible.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Volume of hazardous waste  
treated outside the Group (kt)  
The table below shows the number and volume of accidental  
hydrocarbon spills with an environmental impact and that are  
greater than one barrel in volume:  
232  
237  
248  
Since 2012, TOTAL has also been monitoring the different waste  
treatment technologies used for the following categories:  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2
013  
2012(a)  
Number of hydrocarbon spills  
with an environmental impact  
Total volume of hydrocarbon spills  
with an environmental impact  
169  
219  
263  
Recycling  
37%  
7%  
12%  
23%  
38%  
9%  
12%  
20%  
Waste-to-energy recovery  
Incineration  
Landfill  
(thousands of m³)  
1.8  
2.0  
1.8  
Note: Soil on sites is deemed to form part of the natural environment unless sealed.  
(
a) The values for 2012 have been corrected given that a large volume of wastewater  
discharge should not have been recorded as waste at the Exploration & Production  
subsidiary in Yemen.  
Excluding the amounts spilled as a result of the Elgin incident in the  
North Sea (approximately 700 m³) in 2012, the 2013 volumes increased  
over those of 2012. For the most part, this increase was due to spills  
at refineries (approximately one-third of the total), over 95% of which  
were recovered, as well as better reporting at Marketing & Services.  
Environmental nuisance  
TOTAL’s operations may cause environmental nuisances for residents  
near its industrial sites. These may be sound or odor nuisances,  
but can also result from vibrations or road, sea or river traffic.  
While risk prevention is emphasized, TOTAL regularly addresses  
the issue of crisis management on the basis of risk scenarios  
identified through analyses.  
Most sites have a system for receiving and handling residents’  
complaints, the aim of which is to take account of and gain a  
clearer insight into the different types of nuisances and to minimize  
them. Monitoring systems can also be put in place, such as sound  
level measurements at the site perimeter or networks of sensors  
to determine the origin and intensity of odors.  
In particular, the Group has emergency plans and procedures in  
place in the event of a hydrocarbon leak or spill. For accidental  
spills that reach the surface, anti-pollution plans specific to each  
subsidiary or site, which are adapted to their structure, activities  
and environment while complying with Group recommendations,  
are regularly reviewed and tested during exercises. In 2012, the  
Group’s requirements for preparing emergency plans and the  
associated exercises were set out in a Group directive.  
2
.2.3. Incident risk  
In addition to setting up management structures and systems,  
TOTAL strives to minimize the industrial risks and the environmental  
impacts associated with its operations by:  
The Group uses the following indicators to measure its readiness  
to counteract pollution:  
performing rigorous inspections and audits;  
training staff and raising the awareness of all parties involved; and  
implementing an active investment policy.  
2
013  
Number of sites whose risk analysis identified at least  
one scenario of major accidental pollution to surface water  
Proportion of those sites with  
150  
In particular, TOTAL strives to prevent accidental spills. A common  
technological risk management approach has been developed  
to formalize this requirement at the Group’s industrial sites.  
The methodology is gradually being implemented in all operated  
businesses exposed to technological risks and sets out a risk  
analysis based on incident scenarios for which the severity of the  
consequences and the probability of occurrence are assessed.  
These parameters are used to create a decision matrix that identifies  
the required level of mitigation.  
an operational anti-pollution plan  
87%  
Proportion of subsidiaries and sites whose risk analysis  
identified at least one scenario of accidental pollution  
to surface water and that have performed at least one  
anti-pollution exercise during the year  
82%  
Also available to TOTAL’s subsidiaries, the PARAPOL (Plan to Mobilize  
Resources Against Pollution) alert scheme is used to facilitate crisis  
management at the Group level. Its main aim is to mobilize the internal  
and external human and physical resources necessary to respond  
in the event of pollution of marine, coastal or inland waters, without  
geographical restriction, at any time, at the request of any site.  
Specifically with regard to shipping, the Group has an internal policy  
setting out the rules for selecting vessels. These rules are based on  
the recommendations of the Oil Company International Marine Forum  
(
OCIMF), an industry association made up of the main global oil  
companies that promotes best practices in oil shipping, and on  
OCIMF’s Ship Inspection Report (SIRE) Program. TOTAL does not  
charter any single-hulled vessels for shipping hydrocarbons and  
the average age of the fleet chartered by TOTAL’s Shipping division  
is about five years.  
The Group and its subsidiaries have assistance agreements with  
the main bodies specializing in oil spill management, such as Oil Spill  
Response Limited, CEDRE and Clean Caribbean & Americas. Their  
role is to provide expertise, resources and equipment in all of the  
regions where TOTAL has operations.  
In accordance with industry best practices, TOTAL particularly  
monitors accidental liquid hydrocarbon spills of a volume of more  
than one barrel. Spills that exceed a certain severity threshold  
Following the blowout of the Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico  
in 2010 (in which the Group was not involved), TOTAL created three  
task forces in order to analyze risks and issue recommendations.  
(whether in terms of volume spilt, toxicity of the product in question  
176  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Social and environmental information  
Safety, health and environment information  
7
The task forces finalized most of their work in 2012, and the Group  
has continued deploying solutions to minimize such risks.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Freshwater withdrawals excluding  
cooling water (million m³)  
Percentage of Group sites,  
excluding Marketing,  
In 2012, the work carried out as part of the Subsea Well Response  
Project (SWRP), a consortium of nine oil companies including TOTAL,  
paved the way for the construction of several capping systems  
designed to prevent hydrocarbon spills in the underwater  
environment. In 2013, three of the four capping systems were  
positioned in various parts of the world, representing a solution  
that can be launched into action in case of a deepwater drilling  
pollution incident. The last one will be positioned in 2014.  
126  
143  
142  
located in water-stressed areas  
49%  
49%  
44%  
The decrease in water withdrawals between 2012 and 2013 is due  
mainly to the deconsolidation of the Fertilizers business in 2013.  
The “Optimizing water consumption on industrial sites” guide  
sets out best practices for saving and recycling water at all Group  
sites. The guide has been widely distributed throughout the Group  
since 2007.  
Additionally, the work carried by TOTAL through its Subsea Emergency  
Response System (SERS) has also led to the construction of capping  
equipment to respond to an event on a production well. These capping  
systems will be positioned in 2014 in the Gulf of Guinea where  
TOTAL is strongly present in subsea production.  
In the activities of exploration and production, re-injecting water  
extracted at the same time as the hydrocarbons (production water)  
back into the original reservoir is one of the methods used to maintain  
reservoir pressure. The technical specifications in force in the Group  
stipulate that this option must be given priority over other production  
water treatment technologies.  
In November 2013, a large-scale exercise to simulate a massive oil  
leak in deep offshore waters was conducted in Angola. During this  
3-day emergency exercise, known as “Lula”, the Angolan subsidiary  
deployed the resources that would have been needed to manage  
an actual event of this kind (e.g., several ships, an airplane, helicopters,  
teams working on the FPSO, at the headquarters of the Total E&P  
Angola subsidiary in Luanda and the Group in Paris). It provided  
the ability to test a number of the systems implemented by the  
post-Macondo task forces:  
At refineries and petrochemical sites, water is mainly used to produce  
steam and for cooling units. Increasing recycling and replacing  
water by air for cooling are TOTAL’s preferred approaches for reducing  
freshwater withdrawals.  
deployment of a subsea dispersant injection system;  
supply chain for large quantities of dispersants;  
Soil  
Preliminary work for the Joslyn North oil sands mine in Canada  
began in 2013. Of the 4,000 hectares of forest cleared, about 630  
will be rehabilitated at the end of the project (see point 4.1. of Chapter  
7), with the rest eventually replanted.  
surface anti-pollution mechanisms (e.g., dispersion, recovery); and  
systems for tracking and predicting the location of oil slicks  
(
e.g., satellite tracking, prediction models based on oceanographic/  
Aside from this example, TOTAL uses the ground surface that it needs  
to safely conduct its industrial operations and, at present, does not  
make extensive use of ground surfaces that could significantly conflict  
with the various natural ecosystems or with agriculture.  
meteorological data).  
mobilization of partners that specialize in crisis management  
and pollution control.  
Many lessons have already been learned from this exercise and  
a detailed feedback report is being drafted to further improve the  
Group’s ability to respond to an accident of this scale.  
Raw materials  
Hydrocarbons, an energetic material, are the Group’s main raw  
material. Optimum use of hydrocarbons therefore lies in what is  
known as “energy efficiency”, as described below.  
2.2.4. Sustainable use of resources  
Since 2011, TOTAL has measured the raw material loss rate for  
each line of business. This is the percentage of converted raw  
materials that are neither delivered to any of the business line’s  
customers nor used for energy purposes.  
Water  
The distribution worldwide of available freshwater varies greatly in  
space and time. The issue of water consumption therefore requires  
different responses depending on the regional and technical context.  
Raw material loss rate  
2013  
2012  
2011  
In order to establish which of its facilities are affected by this issue  
as a priority, TOTAL both:  
Hydrocarbon production line of business 2.5%  
2.8%  
0.5%  
2.5%  
0.6%  
Refining line of business  
0.5%  
identifies water withdrawals and discharges across all of its  
sites; and  
Energy efficiency  
identifies sites located in “water stress” areas (watersheds that  
will have less than 1,700 m³ of renewable freshwater available  
per person and per year by 2025, according to the Falkenmark  
indicator), using the Global Water Tool for Oil & Gas developed  
jointly by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development  
and IPIECA.  
Streamlining energy use is one of the Group’s performance targets.  
Internal documents (roadmaps and guides) describe the challenges,  
set out methodologies and action plans, and include quantified  
goals to reduce consumption. Since the beginning of 2013,  
a Group directive has defined the requirements to be met by 2016  
at operated sites that use more than 50,000 tons of oil equivalent  
per year of primary energy.  
In early 2013, the Group set an objective to improve energy  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
177  
Social and environmental information  
7
Safety, health and environment information  
efficiency by 1.5% per year on average between 2012 and 2017  
within Exploration & Production, Refining and Petrochemicals,  
with the exception of the resins business. These areas represent  
over 95% of the Group’s net primary energy consumption.  
A Group Energy Efficiency Index (GEEI) was created in early 2013  
to assess the Group’s performance in this area. It consists of a  
combination of energy intensity ratios (ratio of net primary energy  
consumption to the level of activity) per business, reduced to base  
of their homes (financed at a rate of 50%) and to receive investment  
subsidies for energy efficiency upgrades under the Energy Efficiency  
Certificate program in France and special discounts from building  
professionals who partner with the Group.  
Use of renewable energies  
As part of its strategy, TOTAL has long been committed to  
developing renewable energies. The main focus in developing  
renewable energies is solar energy through SunPower (64.65%).  
TOTAL is also exploring a number of avenues for converting  
biomass to energy.  
1
00 and consolidated with a weighting by each business’s net  
primary energy consumption. Its value is therefore 100 in 2012  
and the goal is to reach 92.5 by 2017.  
2
013  
2012  
2011  
A detailed description of the activities carried out by the Group in  
the field of new energy sources is provided in point 4.2. of Chapter 2.  
Net primary energy consumption (TWh) 157  
Group Energy Efficiency Index  
159  
158  
TOTAL is using renewable energies to supply power to some  
production sites. The Group has installed solar photovoltaic panels  
on several of its buildings (for example, CSTJF in Pau, Lacq, and  
Provence refinery in France) and certain isolated wellheads, as well  
as a number of service station canopies in Europe and Africa.  
(GEEI) (base 100 in 2012)  
102.3  
100  
-
The decrease in net primary energy consumption is due primarily  
to the sale of the Fertilizers business.  
The Group’s energy efficiency worsened in 2013 despite the fact  
that the performance expected at Refining & Chemicals was  
achieved. This is mainly the result of the flaring of associated gas  
during the startup phase of the Usan field in Nigeria, which took  
longer than expected (see point 2.2.5.).  
2
.2.5. Climate change  
Greenhouse gas emissions  
TOTAL has made reducing greenhouse gas emissions one of its  
priorities. It has set the objective of reducing greenhouse gas  
emissions by its operations by 15% from 2008 to 2015.  
Quantified targets have also been defined in an attempt to reduce  
flaring (50% reduction between 2005 and 2014) and improve  
the energy efficiency (1.5% per year between 2012 and 2017).  
These targets are annually published and tracked.  
In early 2011, the Group’s internal structure relating to “Climate  
and Energy” was changed:  
A decision-making body was created in the form of the CO /Energy  
2
Efficiency Management Committee. Its role is to define the  
guidelines and targets on greenhouse gas emissions and energy  
performance. It is based on a permanent energy efficiency task  
force and, where applicable, temporary Group-wide task forces.  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Energy Network days and the Energy seminar provide opportunities  
for internal discussion, reflection and information-sharing.  
Daily volumes of gas flared  
million m³ per day)  
(
10.8  
10.8  
10.0  
In France, Energy Efficiency Certificates (Certificats d’économies  
d’énergie – CEE) are awarded by the Energy and Climate  
Administration (Direction générale de l’Énergie et du Climat)  
in recognition of energy-saving activities. TOTAL is encouraging  
its customers to reduce their energy consumption by 50 TWh  
Operated direct greenhouse  
gas emissions (Mt CO equivalent,  
2
100% of emissions from  
sites operated by the Group)  
Group share of direct greenhouse  
46  
51  
47  
46  
53  
(over the entire service life of the product) over the period of 2011  
gas emissions (Mt CO equivalent,  
2
to 2014.  
from sites in which TOTAL has a stake)  
53(a)  
Through the “Total Ecosolutions” program, the Group is also  
developing innovative products and services that perform above  
market average on the environmental front, such as by curbing  
energy use and greenhouse gas emissions while providing the  
same level of service. At year-end 2013, forty-two products and  
services bore the “Total Ecosolutions” label. SunPower’s photovoltaic  
modules, which received the label in 2013, help avoid approximately  
2
(a) The 2 Mt CO eq correction of the 2012 figure is the result of an error in interpreting the  
information received from our Novatek partner.  
Flaring of associated gas remained stable in 2013 and still includes  
2 Mm³ per day from the start-up phase of the Usan site, which is  
expected to begin its reinjection of associated gas only in 2014  
due to the geological structure of the reservoir. Excluding volumes  
related to the start-up of facilities, the volume of flared associated  
gas totaled 8.8 Mm³/d, a 40% decrease compared with the baseline  
year (2005). The Group’s target is a 50% reduction by 2014, excluding  
start-up phases of new facilities.  
40% of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the entire life cycle  
compared to the market reference (average of the four main  
competing technologies). The CO eq emissions avoided throughout  
2
the life cycle by the use of Total Ecosolutions products and services,  
compared to the use of benchmark products on the market and for  
an equivalent level of service, are measured annually based on sales  
The drop in operated direct greenhouse gas emissions is mainly  
linked to the sale of Fertilizers, which accounted for 1 Mt CO eq  
2
in 2012.  
volumes. This represented 740,000 t of CO eq in 2012. In early 2013,  
2
the Group set the following target: to have fifty “Total Ecosolutions”  
labels by year-end 2015.  
To ensure that investment projects can withstand the general  
emergence of a cost of CO emissions, investments have been  
2
valued since 2008 based on a cost of CO emissions of 25  
2
In late 2012, TOTAL introduced an energy efficiency scheme that  
allows its 40,000 employees in France to perform an energy audit  
per metric ton of CO emitted.  
2
178  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Social and environmental information  
Safety, health and environment information  
7
TOTAL invests in R&D to reduce direct greenhouse gas emissions  
into the atmosphere by other means. The Group especially intends  
to develop CO2 capture, transport and storage technologies.  
For several years now, it has been working on CCS (carbon capture  
and storage), so that it can be used on its industrial sites when  
permitted by economic and regulatory conditions. Currently, two  
production sites in which TOTAL has a stake, the Sleipner and  
Snøhvit fields in Norway, are using these technologies. The research  
program is ongoing, notably through a pilot project at the Lacq  
the performance of baseline surveys and environmental impact  
assessments on land or at sea. Since 2011, all Group business  
units have had access to a detailed mapping tool detailing  
the world’s protected areas based on regularly updated data from  
UNEP-WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Center). The Group  
has renewed its partnership with UNEP-WCMC for 2013-2015.  
In 2012, TOTAL acquired acreage near Lake Albert in Uganda in  
partnership with CNOOC and Tullow (33% each). TOTAL is the  
operator of Block 1 of this license, most of which is located in  
Murchison Falls National Park and the Ramsar zone of the  
Albert Nile Delta. This IUCN II-classified park was created in  
particular to protect its fauna, which includes such iconic species  
as large mammals (for example, elephants and Rothschild’s  
giraffes), reptiles and numerous birds (including the shoebill).  
In light of this site’s unique biodiversity, and in addition to applying  
the general principles of the Group’s biodiversity policy, Total E&P  
Uganda set as its objective a net increase in biodiversity. To this  
end, Total E&P Uganda has adopted specific operating rules,  
such as using wireless geophone systems for seismic campaigns,  
limiting the size of drilling pads to 1 hectare (100 m x 100 m) and  
mapping biodiversity hotspots to prevent interference with areas  
sensitive for fauna (e.g., breeding grounds) during the current  
seismic campaign, especially in the Albert Nile Delta. A dedicated  
social and environmental team, whose members include biodiversity  
specialists, has been created. A “Biodiversity and Livelihood  
Advisory Committee” has been set up with external stakeholders  
from national and international organizations specializing in nature  
conservation and relations between communities and wildlife.  
Its role is to ensure that Total E&P Uganda is aware of and implements  
best practices for its operations inside the park in order to help it  
meet its objective of a net increase in biodiversity.  
complex in France, where CO is being captured by oxy-fuel  
2
combustion, transported and stored in a depleted natural gas field.  
The CO pumping phase was stopped in 2013, but the Group  
2
will continue to monitor the behavior of the CO storage conditions  
2
until March 2016.  
Adapting to climate change  
The Group assesses the vulnerability of its existing and future  
facilities to predicted climate change.  
Climate conditions are factored into the design of industrial facilities,  
which are not only built to withstand extreme events observed  
in the past, but also to include additional safety margins.  
In addition to adapting to climate change and limiting the effects of  
human activity on the climate, TOTAL advocates concerted action,  
particularly the emergence of a balanced, progressive international  
agreement that prevents the distortion of competition between  
industries or regions of the world.  
2.2.6. Protecting biodiversity  
Due to the nature of its business, and particularly because new  
exploration and production projects are located in potentially  
sensitive natural environments, TOTAL’s operations are likely to  
have an impact on biodiversity. More specifically:  
TOTAL classifies protected areas around the world according  
to the categories defined by IUCN (International Union for the  
Conservation of Nature). TOTAL consistently aims to launch  
biodiversity action plans leveraging industry best practices for  
projects at new facilities and production sites (excluding exploration,  
storage and distribution operations) in the most sensitive protected  
areas corresponding to IUCN categories I to IV, such as national  
parks. In-depth studies are carried out prior to each new field  
development project and may lead to a series of preventive  
measures. For instance, in January 2012, the authorities of the  
Democratic Republic of Congo awarded TOTAL an oil exploration  
license (Block III), 30% of which is located in the Virunga national  
park, which is listed among the UNESCO natural World Heritage  
sites. TOTAL made a public commitment not to work within  
the zone currently defined as a national park. This commitment  
was reiterated during the Shareholders’ Meeting in May 2013.  
More generally, TOTAL has undertaken to refrain from prospecting  
or exploiting oil and gas in natural sites inscribed on the World  
Heritage List as at June 4, 2013.  
impacts related to, for example, construction sites, access roads  
and linear infrastructures, that can result in habitat fragmentation;  
physicochemical impacts leading to changes in environments and  
habitats, or that might affect or interfere with certain species; and  
contribution to the propagation of invasive species in terrestrial  
and marine environments.  
TOTAL is aware of these challenges and takes biodiversity into account  
in its guidelines at a number of levels:  
the Safety Health Environment Quality Charter (refer to point 2. of  
this Chapter), Article 10 of which specifies: “TOTAL (…) monitors  
and controls (…) (its) impact on biodiversity”; and  
a biodiversity policy that details the Group’s principles for action  
in this area:  
1
. minimizing the impact of operations on biodiversity throughout  
the facility life cycle;  
Finally, TOTAL is involved in sector-specific initiatives, such as those  
spearheaded by IPIECA, which in 2010 resulted in the publication  
of a guide to the issue of invasive species. Recommendations include  
taking seasons into account when planning work and checking the  
origin of the equipment used (also refer to point 3.3. of this Chapter).  
2
. incorporating biodiversity protection into the environmental  
management system, particularly initial analyses, and social and  
environmental impact studies;  
3. paying specific attention to operations in regions with particularly  
rich or vulnerable biodiversity; and  
4. informing and raising the awareness of employees, customers  
and the public, helping to improve understanding of ecosystems.  
This policy is implemented by means of a number of tools and  
rules. In Exploration & Production, rules and specifications govern  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
179  
Social and environmental information  
7
Community development information  
2.3. Consumer health and safety  
Many of the products that TOTAL markets pose a potential health  
risk if they are incorrectly used. The Group therefore meets its current  
and future obligations with regard to information and prevention in  
order to minimize the risks throughout the product life cycle.  
– a directive stating the minimum requirements for marketing  
products worldwide in order to avoid or reduce potential risks  
to consumer health and the environment.  
TOTAL identifies and assesses the risks inherent in its products and  
their use, and then informs customers and users of these risks and  
the applicable prevention and protection measures. The material  
safety data sheets (MSDS) that accompany all products marketed  
by the Group (in at least one of the languages used in the country)  
and product labels are two key sources of information in this regard.  
All new products comply fully with the regulatory requirements in  
the countries and markets for which they are intended.  
TOTAL uses various guidelines to ensure compliance with  
the necessary measures to be implemented to promote consumer  
health and safety:  
the Safety Health Environment Quality Charter (articles 1 and 5;  
see point 2. of this Chapter);  
a health policy that sets out the Group’s principles for action in  
relation to incident prevention and protecting the health of people  
in direct or indirect contact with its products throughout the entire  
product life cycle, including customers, users and anyone else  
involved (health and products); and  
As part of the first phase of the European REACH Regulation  
(
Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals),  
the Group has registered a total of 214 chemical substances.  
This regulation aims to protect the health of consumers and  
professionals by means of a stringent assessment of the toxicological  
effects for each substance use scenario and the implementation  
of appropriate mitigation measures.  
3. Community development information  
TOTAL’s aim is to be known, both by host governments and by  
its partners, as an operator that strives for excellence. Wherever it  
operates and in line with the values and principles set out in its  
Code of Conduct, Ethics Charter and Safety Health Environment  
Quality Charter, TOTAL places its commitment to community  
development at the heart of its Corporate responsibility to create  
value that is shared with those residing near its facilities, its suppliers  
and its employees. This approach, which is deployed within most of  
the Group’s business units directly linked to operations, encompasses  
the action taken to improve the Group’s integration into the countries  
where it operates.  
– A qualitative self-assessment questionnaire of the application of  
the societal directive. This questionnaire can be used to assess  
and manage the degree of deployment of the societal directive  
in the Group.  
A quantitative questionnaire listing all the local community  
development actions taken by the Group’s operational divisions.  
This new annual reporting aims to improve the measurement of  
the efforts made by the Group in this field.  
In 2013, a cross-functional working group developed eight societal  
performance indicators with reference to the societal policy: two  
indicators measure the quality of social dialogue with stakeholders,  
one indicator concerns the management of the impact of the  
Group’s activities, four others focus on economic and social  
development projects and the last one on access to energy.  
These indicators, applicable to all the community development  
actions consolidated at the Group level from 2014, will allow a  
more accurate analysis of the societal approach of the subsidiaries  
and sites and will serve as a tool to monitor the Group’s community  
actions.  
Managing risks, facilitating operations and creating opportunities  
are the three components of a coherent strategy of reducing negative  
impacts and promoting socioeconomic development through close  
cooperation with national authorities and with the support of local  
populations. To accomplish this, openness, dialogue and engagement  
are essential for developing constructive and transparent relations  
with all stakeholders.  
In concrete terms, the primary goal is to strengthen the local content  
(employment and subcontracting) of the Group’s activities, foster  
economic diversification, support educational and skills improvement  
projects, promote the heritage and cultural wealth of local  
communities, contribute to human and social development and,  
in particular, facilitate access to energy for the most disadvantaged  
populations via innovative and long-term social business solutions.  
The Group’s expertise is based on the continuous professionalization  
of its community development engineers. Tools such as structuring  
projects, setting goals and monitoring and assessing indicators  
have enabled TOTAL to progress from an aid-giving approach to  
one in which communities take charge of their own development.  
In Exploration & Production, more than 400 people are involved  
in community development (including experts under contract),  
with over 360 involved on a full-time basis. Furthermore, TOTAL  
is one of the only companies to dedicate a person in the Group’s  
Head Office to relationships with NGOs.  
New societal reporting tools were developed in 2012 and implemented  
in 2013 to better monitor the community development initiative as  
a whole, in line with the defined strategic priorities (Group societal  
policy and directive). The Group’s societal reporting on the operated  
scope now consists of two parts:  
180  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Community development information  
7
3.1. Dialogue and involvement with stakeholders  
For some twenty years, changes in the regulatory framework have  
promoted the information, consultation and dialogue with  
stakeholders prior to making decisions that have a significant  
environmental impact.  
Refining & Chemicals Segment) with the objective to strengthen  
dialogue between industrial sites and their environment.  
Initiated by TOTAL, the “Safety and Environment Commission”  
of the Feluy industrial park in Belgium is a voluntary forum for  
dialogue among industrial players, authorities and residents on  
the effects of companies’ operations in the areas of safety, health  
and environmental protection.  
In addition to complying with regulations, TOTAL sets up structures  
for dialogue at every level of the Group. Communities neighboring  
TOTAL’s sites often have questions about the impact of the Group’s  
activities on health, safety and the environment. Establishing a dialogue  
with the residents and with other local stakeholders helps provide  
answers to these legitimate concerns.  
The “Conférence Riveraine” (residents’ conference) was set up in  
2007 by the Feyzin refinery in France, in partnership with the  
Feyzin town council. This residents’ dialogue forum improves the  
living conditions of the neighboring population and its relationship  
with the site. It was recognized by the authorities as a consultation  
partner under the technological risk prevention plan.  
The number one requirement of the societal directive is that  
each asset must consult its stakeholders regularly to gain a  
clearer understanding of their expectations and concerns,  
measure their level of satisfaction regarding the Group and  
identify avenues of improvement for its societal strategy”.  
Site monitoring commissions, which succeeded the local  
information and consultation Committees in France, pursuant  
to the French technological risk prevention act, have been created.  
Stakeholder consultation processes  
In 2011, a collective consultation process was introduced in the  
Lorraine region of France involving stakeholders from all the Group’s  
business segments operating in this region.  
TOTAL strives to develop a continuous dialogue with its stakeholders  
and to ensure the long-term sustainability of this relationship through  
various mechanisms and structures. Along these lines, the Group  
has launched various initiatives in recent years:  
“SRM+” dialogue tool  
Several documents have been created to formalize the societal  
methodology at TOTAL: Guide to Stakeholder Dialogue, Local  
Community Guide, Practical guide for Local Development, E&P  
Societal Guide & Manual.  
To put its approach to community development at its sites and  
subsidiaries on a professional footing, TOTAL implemented the  
internal SRM+ (Stakeholder Relationship Management) tool in 2006.  
It is used to identify and map the main stakeholders, schedule  
meetings with them and understand their perception and challenges,  
and then draw up an action plan for building a long-term relationship.  
In the Group’s Exploration & Production subsidiaries, and  
particularly during the project phase, CLOs (Community Liaison  
Officers) often play a key role. These officers, who come from  
the local community, speak its language and understand its  
practices, are employed by TOTAL and trained in the culture  
and specific characteristics of the oil industry. CLOs promote  
the Company’s integration in the local context and are the first link  
in its community development initiative. For example, in Uganda,  
the Exploration & Production subsidiary has set up a highly  
structured process to select eight CLOs and prepare them for  
their tasks. All of them come from the voluntary and NGO sectors  
and have a good knowledge of the social fabric. Each of them  
speak a local language and can therefore speak to the concerned  
people in their language. Similarly, in Yemen, a department is  
dedicated to relations with stakeholders.  
SRM+ was deployed by Exploration & Production in Qatar and  
Kenya in 2013.  
The Marketing & Services segment carried out further deployments  
of SRM+ in 2013, including:  
– India (Namakkal): seventeen stakeholders were interviewed and  
concurred that the subsidiary’s team maintained a good relationship  
with its environment. Some issues, such as power cuts, public  
information and economic development of the community, were  
raised. An action plan was built by the community development  
team and validated by the Executive Committee. It includes  
twenty-two actions, some of which have already been carried  
out, such as renovating the roof of the village community center  
using recycled materials. The building was then inaugurated  
along with the villagers.  
A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) can be signed with the  
communities to formalize an agreement. For example, in Indonesia,  
working Committees signed an MoU with the communities, local  
authorities and Total E&P Indonesia in 2013. Other MoUs have  
been signed in Nigeria and Canada.  
– Jamaica: twenty-nine stakeholders were identified, of whom  
fourteen were interviewed. The action plan features eleven  
priority actions to be implemented. This exercise helped identify  
areas for improvement such as distributing HSEQ documents  
“Open houses” have been created in Yemen and the Republic  
of South Sudan. Public consultations are also organized, as well  
as meetings with stakeholders (Australia, Brunei, Democratic  
Republic of Congo), consultations and media campaigns.  
(e.g., HSE charter, best practices, check lists) to customers, but  
also some medium/long term actions such as organizing a forum  
of local small and medium enterprises (e.g., on accounting,  
energy savings, finance), developing the skills of fuel attendants  
or setting up partnerships on environmental matters.  
®
The signature of “Responsible Care ”, a voluntary commitment  
of the global Chemicals industry, led to the creation of Community  
Advisory Panels in the United States, developed at the initiative  
of the American Chemistry Council. The “Terrains d’entente”  
The Africa/Middle East division is in an active phase of  
development: about ten subsidiaries launched an SRM+  
approach in 2013 (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Gambia, Mali, Sierra Leone,  
Togo, Congo, Gabon, Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Reunion  
Island). These deployments took place either at depots, around  
(common ground) initiative was launched in France in 2002 within  
TOTAL’s Chemicals business segment (now integrated into the  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
181  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Community development information  
certain service stations or at the Head Office depending on the  
specific issues faced by each subsidiary. The progress varies  
from one subsidiary to another, but the actions plans identified  
will be implemented.  
perception of the social impact of its projects in high risk regions.  
The Nigeria Oil & Gas Corporate Social Responsibility 2012 prize  
was awarded to Total E&P Nigeria for its commitment to local  
communities.  
Respect for human rights is a factor of social recognition: the Group  
is recognized today (notably by the Nobel Peace Prize laureate,  
Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi) as a responsible investor in Myanmar.  
Dialogue with indigenous and tribal peoples  
TOTAL is aware of the specificities of indigenous and tribal peoples  
(
as identified in the International Labor Organization’s Convention  
Fully aware that taking human rights into consideration is one  
of the cornerstones of its industrial projects with respect to local  
populations, TOTAL participated in 2012 in the work of the IPIECA  
No. 169), and has introduced a Charter of Principles and Guidelines  
Regarding Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in contact with its  
subsidiaries. Under this Charter and in compliance with its Code  
of Conduct, the Group strives to get to know and understand the  
legitimate needs of the communities neighboring its subsidiaries. In  
particular, this Charter encourages the subsidiaries to call on  
experts to identify and understand the expectations and  
specificities of indigenous peoples, to consult them through  
dialogue before starting industrial projects and to make a positive  
contribution to their socioeconomic development.  
(global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social  
issues) to develop the guide entitled “Indigenous Peoples and the  
oil and gas industry: context, issues and emerging good practices”.  
The Group also contributed to the “Oxfam America’s Community  
Consent Index”, a collection of best practices in terms of FPIC  
(Free Prior Informed Consent). The Group thus shared its experience  
with the Guarani people in Bolivia. The subsidiary Total E&P Bolivia  
has embarked on an exemplary partnership with the Guarani  
communities in the Santa Cruz department. The subsidiary has  
launched a number of socioeconomic development initiatives, by  
striving to rectify discriminations, especially, gender discrimination.  
Further, CDA or “Collaborative Learning Project”, an American  
non-profit organization specialized in handling conflicts with local  
communities, helps the Group to assess the local communities’  
Example: dialogue with indigenous and tribal peoples in Bolivia  
Since 2011, Total E&P Bolivia has been developing a gas deposit discovered in 2004 in the eastern lowlands of Bolivia. This project to construct  
a gas plant and a pipeline of over 100 km falls within a stringent legal framework that protects the rights of indigenous people. The consultation  
process, undertaken by the government, helps identify the economic and sociocultural impacts of the project and, where appropriate, opens the  
door to the negotiation of financial compensation between the concerned company and the stakeholders, for the impacts that cannot be mitigated.  
The consultation process initiated by the subsidiary in 2011 to obtain the environmental permit was suspended in the wake of opposition  
from an indigenous organization that owns a part of the project area regarding rights of use and passage.  
Consultation with the indigenous peoples resumed from May to September 2013 and the negotiations on rights of use resulted in an  
agreement. The Group’s societal directive and its implementation in Exploration & Production helped the subsidiary to manage the community  
development component of the project. Open-mindedness, dialogue and perseverance enabled to forge ties with the communities and  
notably to discuss with several contacts from different groups of stakeholders, formal but also informal leaders, to send across the same  
message to all in a process of direct dialogue with the concerned communities and not just with their representatives.  
Internally, the subsidiary’s community development team became stronger and more professional and also acquired the necessary tools  
(community development plan and procedures). Externally, the team strives to foster dialogue, relies on the government as the mediator  
and reaches out to a number of contacts. It strives to inform the project’s neighbors about the status of the negotiations, the reasons for its  
position and the challenges faced by the project. A participatory approach also aims to involve the communities.  
Grievance handling  
To improve the management of relationships and dialogue with  
stakeholders, the IPIECA has launched a pilot project to promote  
the introduction of international standards and best practices in the  
industry. Total E&P Congo was selected as the pilot to implement  
this grievance mechanism. This process is consistent with a  
willingness to dialogue with the stakeholders to strengthen the  
ties with the Djeno community, to avert societal risks and foster  
a proactive and responsible management of the subsidiary’s  
operations. In 2012, IPIECA engaged the firm Triple R Alliance  
and several missions were carried out at Total E&P Congo in 2012  
and 2013 to complete and improve the efficiency of the already  
existing procedures for receiving and handling grievances.  
An increasing number of Exploration & Production subsidiaries are  
setting up a grievance mechanism for local communities impacted  
by industrial projects. In line with the United Nations Guiding  
Principles on Business and Human Rights, a guide related to  
this complaints procedure was developed and published in  
August 2013. This procedure forms an integral part of the societal  
management plan and embodies the first requirement of the Group’s  
societal directive. For example, a specific mechanism has been  
introduced in Uganda as part of the societal management plan.  
182  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Social and environmental information  
Community development information  
7
3.2. Controlling the impact of the Group’s activities  
Integration of a societal approach  
into operational processes  
Obolo). The aim of this research is to determine a set of impact  
indicators capable of measuring the direct effect of the Group’s  
activities on the living conditions of the impacted populations.  
The results are expected to be consolidated in 2014 and will serve  
as a basis for a study involving the creation of simplified indicators  
for other subsidiaries.  
In order to better control the impact of the Group’s operations,  
the societal approach is integrated into the operational processes.  
Since 2012, societal issues have been integrated into  
Exploration & Production’s HSE management system known as  
MAESTRO (Management and Expectations Standards Towards  
Robust Operations). Seven audits were conducted in 2013  
in the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Uganda, Bolivia, Argentina,  
the UK and Malaysia.  
In addition, the Group regularly calls on CDA to assess the impact  
of its operations and socioeconomic programs in host countries.  
For example, CDA has undertaken several assignments in Myanmar  
in recent years, the reports of which are available on the organization’s  
website.  
Since 2012, the MOST tool (Management Operational Societal Tool)  
has been employed to steer and coordinate societal projects. It was  
set up in 2012 in the Group’s subsidiaries in Congo, Gabon, Angola,  
Nigeria, Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar and  
Yemen. In 2013, it was implemented in Italy, Indonesia, Bolivia and  
Venezuela. This system brings together such modules as “dialogue  
with stakeholders”, “grievance handling”, “land compensation” and  
Road safety awareness initiatives in Africa  
Over the years, the Group has developed a major project to raise  
road safety awareness among all categories of road users. Given its  
distribution activity on the African continent, the Africa/Middle East  
division is particularly sensitive to these issues. It deployed a road  
transport improvement program, PATROM, which it has continued  
to develop over the years.  
contributions to development” (with a “local employment” module  
in Uganda), with functionality that has been further improved in  
013. The use of these tools is part of the process to help the local  
2
In 2013, the Africa/Middle East division launched a large number  
of transporter assessments, carried out by transport professionals,  
in order to check safety management in these companies: 273  
transporters were audited at year-end 2013, which represented  
teams monitor and manage the societal approach with a higher  
degree of professionalism.  
In 2013, impact assessments were notably conducted in Uganda  
and the Democratic Republic of Congo.  
73% of the area’s transporters. In addition to these audits, five  
regional agreements were signed among all the transporters to  
strengthen the sharing of experience, dialogue and best practices.  
Such actions broaden those carried out by the subsidiaries with  
local authorities to enhance transport safety and driver training.  
In the Democratic Republic of Congo, Total E&P Congo became an  
operator in Block III in Lake Albert. TOTAL made the commitment  
not to carry out any exploration activity in the Virunga national park,  
partly located in Block III. With the consent of the Congolese  
national authorities and in compliance with internal rules, an  
Environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) was conducted  
from September 2012 to June 2013 with two visits to the Block.  
About 170 stakeholders were consulted. Two days were devoted to  
reporting the assessment findings, on the spot, to the stakeholders.  
A formal presentation followed by a discussion and  
At the same time, the Group continues to partner with the World  
Bank, within the framework of the United Nations resolution on the  
decade of action for road safety. NGOs in Kenya, Uganda and  
Cameroon have been created to bring the stakeholders together.  
This collaboration, called ARSCI (African Road Safety Corridors  
Initiatives), has helped share and step up societal actions aimed  
at reducing road accidents, considered to be a major public health  
problem.  
a question-answer session was organized for the local and regional  
administrative authorities. One day was also organized for the  
stakeholders, who were invited to review the assessment findings  
and to discuss with TOTAL’s management and technical team.  
Studies conducted in partnership with universities have drawn up a  
map of these roads and identify risk areas to target priority actions.  
Using this information displayed on the onboard computers of  
trucks, drivers can take extra care when they cross these identified  
points and appropriate road signs can also be installed.  
Awareness-raising caravans were also organized in cooperation  
with the police during the road safety week on these roads to  
inform drivers as well as pedestrians about the dangers of the road.  
A number of events were organized to attract a large audience  
during these operations. Private partners are gradually drawing  
up common charters guided by principles that they undertake to  
defend and adopt, such as joint road safety actions for the  
community, technical standards for vehicles, driver training and  
exchanges of information.  
In Uganda, Total E&P Uganda operates in certain Blocks in partnership  
with the companies Tullow and CNOOC. According to Ugandan  
law, TOTAL is not required to carry out any impact assessment until  
the government has approved the project. However, given the need  
to gather and integrate a wealth of information about the societal  
context and potential impacts on the communities, Total E&P Uganda  
chose to engage a team of international and national experts to  
conduct a “social screening”. About twenty communities were  
consulted using recognized methods including interviews, focus  
groups, inventory of communities and direct observation on the  
field. The results of the social screening led to significant changes  
in the project to avoid and minimize the impact on the communities  
living close to future facilities.  
In its endeavor to sensitize the most vulnerable of populations,  
the Group called upon the expertise of GRSP (Global Road Safety  
Program) in 2012 to launch “safety cubes”, an extensive educational  
campaign targeting children. This tool, rolled out in schools by  
the subsidiaries, helps students learn the rules and behaviors to  
adopt to avoid road hazards in a playful and educational way.  
The objective is to reach one million children in three years.  
In Nigeria, research has been entrusted since 2008 to ESSEC/IRENE  
(Advanced High School of Economic and Commercial Sciences/Institute  
for Research and Education in Negotiation in Europe) on the impact  
of oil production activities on people living in the Niger Delta with  
field surveys and interviews with 2,000 people (Onelga and Eastern  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
183  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Community development information  
3.3. Optimizing the Group’s contribution to the socioeconomic  
development of host communities and countries  
While ensuring the competitiveness of operations, the community  
development approach should give rise to new opportunities, both  
for the countries in question and to strengthen the positive impact  
of the operations. Wherever it operates, TOTAL carries a particular  
responsibility for the socioeconomic development of the communities  
living near its facilities. This aim is embodied in a variety of ways:  
– In the Congo, Total E&P Congo set up an organization in 2012  
dedicated to the development of local content. This department’s  
task is to expand the use of Congolese enterprises, notably by  
identifying and assessing local companies likely to become  
Total E&P Congo’s subcontractors and then by providing them  
programs to develop their capacities (e.g., managerial, industrial,  
HSE). An in-depth study to identify the potential to increase the  
local content in Total E&P Congo revealed business areas where  
this potential was the highest. To strengthen local capacities in  
these key areas, the Moho North project instituted a mandatory  
local content plan with respect to its international contractors,  
cascaded down to lower-level local contractors. Due to these  
joint efforts, Total E&P Congo has set the objective of increasing  
the local content level of its purchasing from its current 22% to  
32% by 2022.  
1. the Group’s commitment to local employment (local content);  
2. educational partnerships for training and education; and  
3. support for the implementation of socioeconomic programs.  
The Group’s commitment to local content  
In Africa, the Group works particularly in favor of the development of  
the industrial fabric and local content (local production, local personnel  
in the subsidiaries, pre-qualification of local contractors, development  
of domestic infrastructures, diversification of the local economy).  
For several years, the Marketing & Services segment has organized  
the “Young Dealers” program in Africa/Middle East, aimed at  
promoting young service station employees who have business and  
managerial skills. The aim is to help employees with potential to  
eventually become a service station manager. Due to this program,  
young people unable to provide a guarantee can benefit from a  
financial loan along with training and substantial technical  
In Angola, more than 3 million hours of work have been completed  
locally as part of the Pazflor project. In cooperation with the  
educational projects supported by Total E&P Angola, some fifty  
candidates have been recruited and trained by the national oil  
institute since 2007 in order to become production operators on  
the project. For the CLOV project, slated to start production in  
2
014, more than 10 million hours of work have been completed  
assistance. A number of them thus have the opportunity to create  
and succeed in their own business in the distribution of petroleum  
products. With this management mode, the Group develops skills  
and boosts the motivation of its service station employees.  
Out of the 3,500 service stations in Africa/Middle East, 1,300 are  
managed by young dealers, that is, 29% of TOTAL’s network.  
in Angola. Through CLOV, Total E&P Angola has also trained  
nearly forty students holding an operator’s diploma, who are now  
working in the FPSOs in Block 17 in Angola. This is the first time  
in Angola that a project is conducted with so many local man-  
hours and with such a high level of production carried out inside  
the country.  
TOTAL’s activities generate hundreds of thousands of direct and  
indirect jobs worldwide. The Group’s purchasing activities alone  
represented about 31 billion worldwide in 2013. This presents  
numerous challenges with regard to TOTAL’s impact on the  
environment, society and community development, all of which  
the Group takes into account in its relationships with suppliers  
(see point 3.6. of this Chapter).  
In Nigeria, over 80% of the subsidiary’s employees are locals  
and more than 100 new local recruits are expected each year.  
Twenty-eight percent of the construction work to develop Akpo  
was entrusted to local contractors, which represents approximately  
10 million hours worked. For the Egina project, the goal is to  
complete about 21 million hours of work locally.  
A major component: developing the regional economic fabric in France  
Since the 2000s, the participation of local service providers in industrial projects has steadily increased. In addition to the jobs generated by its  
activities, the Group, as a responsible company, supports small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in France, particularly through Total  
Développement Régional (TDR). The aim of this structure is to promote the creation of SMEs with a view to developing the local economic fabric.  
TDR has set up a program to pre-qualify and certify French small and medium-sized companies, in line with the standards required by the  
Group, in order to work with more local suppliers.  
The Total Emploi Local (Total Local Employment) initiative has been implemented on the Normandy platform with the following aims, in the  
context of major investments (exceeding 1 billion, aimed at adapting the production facility to market demand and future environmental  
requirements by improving energy efficiency, safety and reliability):  
promote the development of local content by training and professionalizing unqualified people or job-seekers; and  
enable local companies to work on TOTAL projects.  
TOTAL has thus initiated a partnership approach with all the economic, employment and training, and inspection stakeholders.  
This innovative initiative has proved to be very encouraging, with nearly 1,200 jobs created in the Le Havre region, more than half under  
open-ended contracts. Local companies have recruited qualified staff and can thus meet the needs of future projects in the region.  
Local players in integration, employment and training are equipped with tools and a methodology to anticipate future recruitment  
184  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Community development information  
7
and training requirements. Candidates can showcase their aptitudes to future recruiters with their skills passport. TOTAL has thus  
successfully completed its major projects by entrusting 70% of the services to local companies. This initiative has moreover achieved  
sustainability, with Le Havre Chamber of Commerce and Industry taking over this project, renamed “Compétences totalement estuaire”.  
TDR can also support planned employment area regeneration schemes alongside the redeployment of the Group’s activities, as illustrated  
by the reconversion of the Lacq industrial basin.  
The support provided forms a major component of TOTAL’s economic and industrial policy and takes a number of forms:  
financial backing for the creation, buy-out and expansion of SMEs, and support for regeneration along with local development players;  
support for export and international expansion; and  
aid for innovative SMEs.  
In the last three years, TDR has provided 12.5 million in financial assistance for 386 SMEs, supporting 6,964 jobs.  
Educational partnerships  
The eighth Total Summer School took place in Paris in July 2013,  
welcoming more than 100 students from thirty countries to debate  
energy challenges.  
TOTAL promotes the internationalization of its management and  
therefore encourages the recruitment of local personnel and their  
access to positions of responsibility, particularly within their local  
subsidiaries. As part of its social programs, the Group therefore  
offers local and international scholarships to create skilled local  
workforces for future hiring. thousands of students are thus given  
the opportunity to pursue their studies in their country of origin or at  
the world’s leading universities. TOTAL’s international scholarship  
program has also enabled over 700 students from thirty countries  
to study in France for qualifications (bachelor’s degrees, engineering  
and master’s degrees, MBAs and doctorates).  
The University partnership program launched in Africa in 2010 has  
been extended to all of Europe, Asia and Middle East. Only the  
Americas are yet to be covered. Apart from their societal aspects,  
these partnerships, more than 50 in number at the moment, aim to  
hone the talents required to achieve the Group’s international ambitions.  
In Africa, the Group continues to support the pilot secondary  
education programs launched in 2008 in the Eiffel (Angola) and  
Augagneur (Congo) high schools to provide free, world-class  
education in regions where educational opportunities are still  
limited. TOTAL also funds the development of preparatory courses  
for prestigious universities at the Léon Mba high school in Gabon.  
In the field of higher education, TOTAL has entered into  
Moreover, in July 2012, TOTAL signed a partnership agreement  
with the French Foreign Ministry as part of the program for co-  
funding international grants known as “Quai d’Orsay – Entreprises”,  
in addition to the existing partnership. The master-level courses in  
French universities are open to students from six countries.  
partnerships with the oil institutes and science faculties in several  
countries: IST-AC (Congo/Cameroon), Institut du Pétrole et du Gaz  
(
Gabon), University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria).  
With support from other major groups, TOTAL, Paris Tech and the  
École polytechnique introduced the Renewable Energy Science and  
Technology Master II postgraduate degree program in the fall of  
Supporting the implementation  
of socioeconomic programs  
2011. Forty students from eighteen countries enrolled for this  
program in the fall of 2013.  
TOTAL’s contribution to the socioeconomic and human  
development of the countries where the Group operates is reflected  
in its involvement in local development programs.  
TOTAL is particularly active in supporting research chairs in thirty-five  
establishments, half of which are in France. One of the latest examples  
is the “Enterprise Architecture” chair at the École Centrale de Lille.  
The Group’s expenditure on community development has increased  
regularly over the last three years: 305 million in 2011,  
Another of the Group’s flagship initiatives in favor of education was  
the fourth Total Energy and Education Seminar, which took place in  
Paris. This seminar is organized every eighteen months and brings  
together nearly 100 academics from forty countries. The academics  
and TOTAL managers and external experts discuss issues such as  
the future of energy, climate change, relationships between  
universities and businesses, and the impact of globalization on  
education and Human Resources management.  
316 million in 2012, and 357 million in 2013. About 90% of the  
expenditure on community development is made outside OECD  
countries. In 2013, around 3,400 community development actions  
were identified, spread evenly among the business segments  
(Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services).  
These programs support or serve local communities by contributing  
to their cultural, socioeconomic and human development. These  
communities are usually impacted by the Group’s presence or  
activities. These programs fall into three main categories: good  
citizenship, human and social development, and local economic  
development.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
185  
Social and environmental information  
7
Community development information  
The importance of partnerships  
TOTAL’s approach is moving away from a purely donation-based model to a partnership model. Its commitment should be reflected in long-  
term partnerships in all the countries where the Group operates. Built on attentive listening, constructive dialogue and the firm determination  
to forge relationships of trust with the stakeholders, these partnerships with local institutions and organizations guarantee the long-term success  
of the projects. One of the eight indicators selected by the Group for monitoring its community development performance is therefore the  
number of actions carried out in partnership.  
TOTAL takes care not to substitute the local authorities in all its actions. In this regard, TOTAL teams up with NGOs specializing in social  
action, which have a solid field experience. These organizations help the Group increase the effectiveness of the socioeconomic  
development programs it supports, particularly by encouraging it to take into account the entire life cycle of its programs, from the design  
phase to shutdown.  
In Congo, a 2-year partnership agreement was signed in June 2012 with the Fishing and Aquaculture Ministry and the association Renatura  
to launch the “Fishing Practices Support Program in Congo”. The objectives are to support those involved in fishing, apply regulations in force,  
suggest alternatives in terms of fishing practices likely to minimize marine turtle by-catch and ensure a better regeneration of fisheries resources.  
Moreover, as part of its drive to support the diversification of local economies, in Congo, TOTAL has stepped up its commitment to the  
Pointe-Noire Industrial Association (APNI), a platform launched in 2000 for developing small and medium-sized companies. APNI offers the  
services of an Approved Management Center (CGA), which helps SMEs with fiscal monitoring and account keeping. APNI also provides a  
Market observatory with theme-based conferences (e.g., SMEs and banking, Being a young entrepreneur, Business and energy).  
In Nigeria, TOTAL is committed to foster the local economic development of the Egi region, in the heart of the Niger Delta  
where it has been operating since 1964. In partnership with local communities, TOTAL has set up the Small & Medium Enterprises-  
Development Network (SME-DN), a training center that aims to stimulate and sustain entrepreneurship in the region. In 2011, TOTAL sought  
the technical assistance of the European Institute  
for Economic Development (IECD) requesting it to implement its methodology of supporting small businesses within SME-DN.  
Since 2011, SME DN has hosted three courses, training a total of seventy-seven entrepreneurs in the Egi region. The results are positive: six  
months after the training, the entrepreneurs increased their turnover (+25% on average), thereby improving their standards of living.  
3.4. The access to energy program  
For more than ten years, certain subsidiaries have been occasionally  
and independently engaged in various community development  
projects focusing on access to energy, in three main areas:  
sustainable. For this reason, the Group has developed “Total  
Access to Energy”, which proposes energy solutions adapted to  
underprivileged populations. The Group relies on feedback from  
experiments conducted in recent years to implement these  
programs in a social business context, with a view to deploying  
sustainable energy access solutions that can be reproduced on a  
large scale.  
the electrification of rural areas that are not connected to the  
electric power network, thanks to photovoltaic solutions. 20,000  
households have been electrified in South Africa using  
photovoltaic kits, plus a further 25,000 in Morocco;  
As of today, Total Access to Energy covers two areas in line with  
TOTAL’s core business:  
aid for LPG supplies through the Shesha program in South  
Africa, in which gas cylinders are sold to the residents of  
townships in order to improve their security and health; and  
– the development of photovoltaic solar energy in non-OECD  
countries (the “Awango by Total” trademark was launched in  
the use of associated gases to produce electricity in certain  
countries where TOTAL’s Exploration & Production has  
2012); and  
operations. The project developed on OML 58 in Nigeria caters  
to almost 100,000 people. In Yemen, a project was carried out in  
cooperation with the state-owned electricity company to supply  
electricity generated using associated gas to neighboring  
communities (approximately 500,000 people served). In 2013, a  
study was conducted to assess the possibility of increasing the  
capacity. In Congo, TOTAL contributed to the funding of the  
extension of the electricity network in certain districts of Pointe  
Noire, supplying electric power to about 10,000 people.  
– the fight against fuel poverty in OECD countries (mobility and  
heating).  
“Awango by Total” program  
This program is in line with a social business strategy: the project’s  
profitability target ensures its sustainability, while at the same time  
satisfying certain expectations of host countries, thereby strengthening  
TOTAL’s presence and making its activities more visible. It also  
contributes to enabling access to energy for as many people  
as possible, a mission set by the Group.  
These projects were usually developed in cooperation with the  
communities neighboring the Group’s sites or as part of programs  
launched by the authorities in the host countries and sometimes  
without any goals to achieve economic viability and, therefore,  
sustainability.  
At the United Nations Rio Conference in June 2012 (“Rio+20”),  
TOTAL committed to enabling five million people on low incomes to  
have access to lighting thanks to reliable photovoltaic products by  
2015, while offering a broad selection of services, ranging from  
To improve its societal performance and structure its approach,  
TOTAL aims to develop programs that are both profitable and  
after-sales to options for the collection of end-of-life products and  
recycling.  
186  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Community development information  
7
TOTAL was the leading sponsor of Lighting Africa, the worldwide  
conference on energy access organized in Dakar in November 2012  
by the World Bank and the International Finance Corporation (IFC).  
At this conference, TOTAL launched its new Awango by Total brand  
to market a range of products and services that meet the lighting  
and mobile phone charging needs of people without access to  
electricity. By the end of 2013, 460,000 solar lamps were sold since  
the launch of this brand in twelve countries, including Cameroon,  
Kenya, Senegal, Burkina Faso, Uganda, Nigeria, Cambodia,  
Indonesia, Myanmar and Haiti.  
– With the associations “PIMMS” and “Unis Cité” for identifying  
those living in fuel poverty through a project in the French  
Meurthe et Moselle department.  
With “Fondation FACE” for identifying and supporting customers  
using fuel oil for heating, primarily in peri-urban and rural areas in  
two French pilot departments: Bas-Rhin and Sarthe.  
– With the association “Parcours Confiance” to test the relevance  
of housing micro-credit for carrying out thermal renovation.  
As part of the “Living Better” public program, the Group has  
contributed to 20% of thermal renovations in seventeen French  
departments carried out at the national level for the fuel poor.  
Between 2011 and year-end 2013, 4,773 thermal renovations  
were carried out with TOTAL’s support.  
The Awango by Total brand is expected to be deployed in five more  
countries by mid 2014: Tanzania, Zambia, Pakistan, Congo, and  
Niger. The distribution networks used to market solar solutions are  
both existing TOTAL networks and so-called “last mile” networks  
built with local partners with a view to bringing these solutions as  
close as possible to where people live.  
At the end of 2013, under an agreement signed with the French  
Ministry for Sports and Youth, Voluntary Associations and  
Popular Education, the Group committed to an additional amount  
of 2 million to implement the public program on thermal renovation  
known as “Habiter Mieux” (Living Better) over two years (end of  
the program in 2015).  
Fighting fuel poverty in OECD countries  
The “fuel poverty” project is the Group’s global response to the  
challenge of access to heating as well as mobility in Europe and in  
emerging countries. It may be recalled some 15% to 20% of the  
population in Europe is considered “fuel poor”.  
As regards the mobility component, TOTAL’s partnership with  
the Voiture & Co association helped open two mobility platforms  
(supply of low-cost vehicles, personalized advice and support,  
microlending for the purchase of mobility solutions, etc.) in the French  
Eure and Hauts-de-Seine departments. In addition, a nation-wide  
study was conducted and made public in December 2013 on the  
challenges faced by those with limited transport facilities in accessing  
employment. Moreover, the above-mentioned agreement with the  
French Ministry for Sports and Youth, Voluntary Associations and  
Popular Education also included a mobility component with an  
additional 2 million to launch a call for projects to identify and  
support innovative mobility initiatives throughout France.  
In 2013, the fuel poverty issue sparked off a number of exchanges  
between all the concerned players (public, private, civil society) all  
over the Europe area. The challenges have been more or less  
clearly identified depending on the countries and the solutions  
implemented focus more on heating/housing than on mobility.  
In 2013, TOTAL pursued and expanded its “fuel poverty” project  
launched in 2012 in France. In the “heating/housing” component,  
the Group continued pilot projects aimed at testing solutions for the  
fuel poor at all the links in the chain:  
3.5. Partnerships and philanthropy  
TOTAL Corporate foundation/  
TOTAL S.A. Philanthropy  
1. With regard to the marine biodiversity, the Foundation funds  
programs aimed at research studies to improve knowledge,  
protection and enhancement of marine and coastal species and  
ecosystems. In 2013, the Foundation supported nearly sixty  
projects (new or ongoing projects). The Foundation continued to  
support the “Pristine” project whose objective is to redefine the  
baseline for coral ecosystems in order to assess human impacts  
in three areas of the Pacific (New Caledonia, Tonga and Polynesia).  
The project also produced a report on the diversity of the fish  
identified and the quality of their habitat during the “IMPAC 3”  
international conference in October 2013 in Marseille (France).  
2. The Foundation promotes cultural dialogue by supporting  
exhibitions that showcase the heritage and arts of the Group’s  
host countries. In 2013, the Group supported twelve exhibitions.  
A great patron of the Paris-based Arab World Institute, the  
Foundation has supported the “Golden Age of Arab Sciences”  
exhibition as well as its tours in Qatar, Kuwait and the United  
Arab Emirates. In 2013, the exhibition was held at the Abu Dhabi  
Paris Sorbonne University, providing an opportunity to promote  
French cultural competence, showcase the cultures of the  
Mediterranean Basin and Arabian Peninsula, and foster  
In addition to the community development initiatives that are directly  
related to the Group’s industrial activities, TOTAL has also been  
committed for many years to taking general-interest measures in  
the countries where it has operations. At the Head Office, the  
Group’s philanthropic actions are essentially conducted by the  
TOTAL Corporate Foundation and by the Philanthropy Department  
of TOTAL S.A.  
Founded in 1992 in the wake of the Rio Earth Summit, the TOTAL  
Foundation celebrated its twentieth anniversary in 2012. Initially  
dedicated to the environment and marine biodiversity, the  
Foundation is now active in four fields:  
1
2
3
4
. marine biodiversity;  
. culture and heritage;  
. health; and  
. solidarity.  
At the end of 2012, TOTAL renewed the commitments of its  
Foundation for a further five years (2013-2017), with a 50 million  
multi-year action budget.  
intercultural dialogue. In France, with the heritage association  
Fondation du Patrimoine, TOTAL Corporate Foundation also  
supports the preservation of traditional crafts and industry and  
the restoration of heritage sites in France.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
187  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Community development information  
3
. In the field of health, the Foundation has partnered with Institut  
Pasteur since 2005. Professor F. Barré-Sinoussi, 2008 Nobel  
Prize laureate, is the resource person for this partnership, which  
focuses on the fight against infectious diseases. The Foundation  
also contributes to research programs and field actions in  
partnership with the Group’s subsidiaries, mainly in Africa.  
In 2013, the Foundation supported more than six field projects  
The Group has also forged a number of major institutional  
partnerships in France. In 2009, TOTAL signed an innovative  
50 million partnership agreement with the French Ministry  
for Youth to promote the social and professional integration of  
young people. This led to the financing of over 200 social action  
projects between 2009 in 2013. In line with this partnership, the  
Group reaffirmed its commitment by supporting the government-  
sponsored “Priorité Jeunesse” (Priority to Youth) program.  
(new or ongoing projects). After financing the deployment of a  
program to prevent sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS  
among truck drivers in Morocco between 2007 and 2011,  
a similar program was launched in Burkina Faso in 2013.  
. Finally, the Foundation encourages Group Employees to engage  
with the community, through support for projects championed by  
non-profit organizations with which employees volunteer on a  
personal basis. In 2013, the Foundation supported more than  
sixty employee projects in thirty-four countries.  
Since 2008, TOTAL has also partnered with the French Society  
of Sea Rescuers (SNSM). Through its funding and expertise, the  
Group plays a role in improving the safety of maritime rescue  
operations and training volunteers.  
4
For more than 20 years now, TOTAL Corporate Foundation’s  
ambition has been to foster the development general interest  
measures, going beyond the Group’s industrial responsibility,  
by encouraging the convergence of expertise and innovation.  
3.6. Fair operating practices  
Preventing corruption  
This initiative involves actions to raise awareness amongst employees  
and to train them. Training seminars are organized for all compliance  
officers, and proposed to any employee exposed to the risk of  
corruption while performing his or her duties. An e-learning course  
on the prevention of corruption, available in twelve languages, has  
been made available internally since 2011. By year-end 2013, more  
than 45,000 employees had taken the course.  
The amounts of money involved and the diversity of the various  
regions require the oil industry to be particularly vigilant about  
corruption and fraud. Around one quarter of TOTAL’s employees  
work in countries considered to be high-risk in this regard  
(countries in which the Transparency International index of the  
perception of corruption is less than or equal to fifty). Preventing  
corruption and fraud is therefore a major challenge for the Group  
and all its employees.  
Under the settlements reached in 2013 between TOTAL, the SEC  
(Securities and Exchange Commission) and the U.S. Department  
of Justice (DoJ), an independent monitor was appointed to conduct  
a 3-year review of the anti-corruption compliance and related internal  
control procedures implemented by the Group and to recommend  
improvements, when necessary. The monitor’s mission started  
on December 2, 2013 (see Chapter 5, point 1.10.).  
TOTAL’s stance on the issue of corruption is based on clear  
principles, set out in 2000 in the Code of Conduct: “TOTAL rejects  
bribery and corruption in all forms, whether public or private, active  
or passive”.  
The Code of Conduct sets out the principles governing the actions  
and individual behavior of each person, both in their day-to-day  
decisions and in their relations with stakeholders. In it, TOTAL  
reiterates its support for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational  
Enterprises and the Tenth Principle of the United Nations Global  
Compact, which urges businesses to work against corruption in all  
its forms.  
Human rights  
Although the ultimate responsibility for human rights lies with  
governments, the activities of companies can affect the human  
rights of the employees, partners or communities with which they  
interact in numerous ways. In addition to being an ethical  
commitment for TOTAL, adopting a proactive approach to human  
rights within the Company is vital for its daily business. This  
approach helps to establish and maintain successful relationships  
with all stakeholders.  
The Group’s commitment in this area relies on the principle of “zero  
tolerance” in matters of corruption and is regularly reiterated by  
TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer particularly to its  
employees and to stakeholders. This commitment takes the form  
of a number of actions:  
TOTAL’s Code of Conduct formally recognizes the Group’s support  
for the principles of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human  
Rights, the core conventions of the International Labor Organization,  
the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the principles  
of the United Nations Global Compact. Between 2005 and 2011,  
the Group took part in the consultations organized by the United  
Nations’ special representative, Professor John Ruggie, on the  
issue of business and human rights. The Group’s Chairman and  
Chief Executive and the General Counsel expressed their support  
for the “protect, respect, remedy” framework and for the UN’s  
guiding principles on business and human rights.  
in 2009, approval by the Executive Committee of a corruption  
prevention policy and a robust compliance program (e.g.,  
training, communication, due diligence, audits) and the creation  
of a dedicated compliance structure;  
creation of the Compliance and Social Responsibility Department  
within the Group Legal Department, which is now backed by  
a network of more than 350 compliance officers in the Holding  
and the Group’s various business segments; and  
in 2011, the Executive Committee’s decision to reinforce the  
means of preventing fraud and corruption by setting up suitable  
programs.  
Furthermore, the Group is actively involved in numerous initiatives  
and working groups on human rights that bring together various  
stakeholders. As part of the Global Compact, TOTAL takes part in  
188  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Community development information  
7
the Human Rights Working Group, the Expert Group on  
security and human rights (VPSHR); prevention of societal  
impacts on local communities; and working conditions, both  
of TOTAL’s employees and in its supply chain. Further, in one  
of these videos, TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
and Professor John Ruggie discuss TOTAL’s roadmap on human  
rights, as well as the importance of complying with the Group’s  
human rights standards in daily activities.  
Responsible Business in Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas and  
the Anti-Corruption Working Group. Created in 2010, Global  
Compact LEAD (Initiative for Sustainable Leadership) has fifty-four  
members, among which TOTAL is the first French company. The  
Group is also a founding member of the Global Business Initiative  
on Human Rights and takes part actively in the work of IPIECA,  
through the following working groups: Social Responsibility Working  
Group, Human Rights Task Force, and Responsible Security  
workshop. Moreover, after having implemented the recommendations  
of the Voluntary principles on security and human rights (VPSHR)  
for several years, TOTAL joined this initiative in March 2012. Lastly,  
since 2012, TOTAL has taken part in the activities of the NGO Shift,  
created by Professor John Ruggie after his term of office with the  
UN. TOTAL’s General Counsel took part in various workshops  
organized by Shift in Boston (USA) on the practical implementation  
of respect for human rights by companies.  
Listening and advice bodies: two dedicated bodies, the Ethics  
Committee and the Compliance and Social Responsibility  
Department, are available to advise employees and coordinate  
efforts to promote human rights. All employees experiencing  
difficulties in the practical implementation of the Code of Conduct  
should turn first to their line manager; if necessary, they can  
contact the Human Resources Department or take their  
concerns to the Ethics Committee.  
The Ethics Committee is a central, independent structure  
that represents all of TOTAL’s business units. Its role is to listen  
to, support and advise both employees and people outside  
the Group. The Committee maintains complete confidentiality  
with regard to referrals; this can only be lifted with the agreement  
of the person in question.  
Internally, the Executive Committee adopted a roadmap in 2013 for  
the period 2013-2015, with the view of strengthening TOTAL’s  
compliance with human rights standards in its operations and risk  
management systems, particularly in sensitive countries where the  
Group operates. This roadmap is implemented in the various  
departments and entities concerned by these issues (Sustainable  
Development, Legal, Ethics, Security, Purchasing, Human  
Resources, Training and Audit Departments).  
 Assessment tools: these are used to regularly assess the  
subsidiaries’ human rights practices and the risks they face.  
They analyze the local consequences of projects (societal audits  
in which local communities in certain countries are questioned on  
their perception of the impact of the Group’s activities on their  
everyday lives) or check that the subsidiaries’ ethical practices  
meet the Group’s standards. Most of these tools are designed  
to prevent or limit the ethical risks or impacts related to the  
Group’s activities. Some of them are used with the assistance  
of independent experts, such as GoodCorporation, the Danish  
Institute for Human Rights or the CDA Collaborative Learning  
Projects. Action and monitoring plans are then implemented  
on the basis of these assessments.  
Moreover, in order to spell out its human rights position and  
initiatives, TOTAL has created a Human Rights Coordination  
Committee, managed by the Ethics Committee Chairman. A  
discussion forum that meets three or four times a year, its members  
include representatives of the Human Resources, Public Relations,  
Legal, Finance, Security, Purchasing and Sustainable Development  
Departments. The Committee coordinates the initiatives taken by  
the Group’s various business units. During these meetings, the  
participants share their feedback and information on human rights,  
and particularly on TOTAL’s involvement in public or private  
international initiatives (e.g., VPSHR, EITI, GBI, IPIECA), on human  
rights tools developed internally or externally, on procedures and  
internal policies already adopted or under construction, and on civil  
society projects.  
Contractors and suppliers  
In its Code of Conduct, TOTAL states that it expects its suppliers to  
respect equivalent principles to which it abides. A document entitled  
Fundamental Principles in Purchasing” sets out the commitments  
Linked to the United Nations’ guiding principles on business and  
human rights, TOTAL’s human rights approach is based on several  
pillars:  
that the Group expects of its suppliers with regard to respecting  
fundamental rights at work, protecting health and the environment,  
preventing corruption, complying with the rules of free competition  
and promoting economic and social development. The rules set out  
in this document may be made available to TOTAL suppliers in order  
to obtain a contractual commitment that they will comply with them.  
In some contracts, such as those covering the oil operations of the  
Exploration & Production segment, the principles contained in  
TOTAL’s Code of Conduct (e.g., preventing corruption, health,  
environment, security, safety, societal, right to work) are covered  
by specific contract clauses.  
Written principles: in accordance with its Code of Conduct,  
the Group has adopted principles appropriate to the operations  
and countries where it works, some of which are set out in the  
Human Rights Internal Guide published in 2011 in English,  
French, Spanish and Chinese.  
Awareness actions: to ensure that its human rights principles  
are disseminated in-house, TOTAL raises employee awareness  
via corporate communications channels such as the Ethics and  
Security intranet sites, and through specific training programs  
tailored to the various challenges encountered in the field.  
These programs are listed in the TOTAL University’s Ethical,  
Environmental and Social Responsibilities catalogues. For  
example, a new training program called “Responsible Leadership  
for a sustainable business” targeting the management was  
created in 2013. The Group has also developed, in collaboration  
with the NGO Shift, a series of four awareness-raising videos on  
the Group’s human rights standards. These videos highlight three  
key topics that the Group has identified: Voluntary principles on  
Questionnaires focused on environmental and social challenges are  
used to gather more in-depth information from suppliers about their  
approach to these subjects, either during pre-qualification or as part  
of an audit. This aspect of supplier relationships can also be examined  
in ad hoc ethical assessments of Group’s subsidiaries or entities  
performed by GoodCorporation. With the deployment of the anti-  
corruption policy in 2013, specific questionnaires were sent to a  
certain number of suppliers and in some cases, external audits  
were carried out.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
189  
Social and environmental information  
7
Other social, community development and environmental information  
A cross-functional working group dedicated to sustainable  
purchasing, which includes the various segments and the  
Purchasing and Sustainable Development departments, has been  
active since 2011. This group is tasked with reinforcing TOTAL’s  
policy in this area by using the initiatives taken in each segment.  
In 2012, a map of the CSR risks and opportunities in the Group’s  
main purchasing categories was created in order to identify the  
main issues in three areas: ethics and human rights, environmental  
impact, and the creation of value with the communities. Pilot projects  
were implemented in certain categories in order to concretely  
integrate the monitoring of CSR aspects into the purchasing  
process (e.g., specific questionnaire focusing on the fundamental  
procurement principles, drafting of suitable contract clauses, good  
practices guide for purchases from the sheltered sector).  
sustainable purchasing training sessions were organized in 2013 in  
France and will continue to be offered in 2014. Concrete tools have  
been developed to support this training and are used in pre- and  
post-learning: fact sheets on international references (for example,  
principles of the International Labour Organization); country fact  
sheets (specifying aspects of local law); internal feedback; and  
methodology sheets (e.g., total cost of ownership, life cycle  
analysis, eco-labels).  
In France, purchases from the sector for disabled workers  
continued to rise with the signature of new contracts; Group  
purchases from the sector for disabled workers tripled, in terms  
of recipient entities, for the Group’s three main sites at the  
Head Office in Paris between 2012 and 2013.  
In March 2014, TOTAL received the “Responsible supplier  
relationships” label for its Holding and Marketing & Services  
activities in France. This label, awarded by the French authorities,  
recognizes companies that maintain sustainable and balanced  
relationships with their suppliers.  
In February 2013, the Group Purchasing Committee decided to  
focus on awareness-raising and training on sustainable purchasing,  
and to develop the integration of sustainable purchasing targets  
in the annual interviews of buyers (initially central buyers). Seven  
4
. Other social, community development  
and environmental information  
4.1. TOTAL and oil sands  
With the development of several major projects in the Canadian oil  
sands, TOTAL expects to produce 200 kb/d of bitumen within ten  
to fifteen years. It is vital that the environmental challenges, and in  
particular the impact on water, the rehabilitation of the land and the  
ecosystems affected, together with greenhouse gas emissions, are  
taken into account. For several years, TOTAL has been actively  
involved in the various collaborative research initiatives undertaken  
by Canadian industry into these areas, and invests approximately  
CAD 30 million each year. In particular, TOTAL is one of the founding  
members of COSIA (Canadian Oil Sands Innovation Alliance),  
an initiative launched in 2012 by fourteen producers in Canada  
to accelerate the improvement in the environmental performance  
of Canadian oil sands by promoting collaboration and innovation.  
centrifuging, in order to significantly reduce the size of the tailing  
ponds and ensure that they are solidified within a few years.  
As open-pit mining of oil sands disturbs land and ecosystems, TOTAL  
is committed to their sustainable rehabilitation throughout its operations,  
taking into account the specific features of the boreal forest. Sixty  
percent of the rehabilitation work at Joslyn is expected be completed  
at the end of mining, and the rest in the next seven years.  
Over and above Canadian industry’s efforts to reduce greenhouse  
gas emissions from the entire oil sands production chain (which are  
approximately 10% to 15% higher than the average for  
conventional crude in a complete “well to wheel” cycle, according  
to the Group’s estimates), TOTAL plans to install cogeneration units  
at its mines. The Group is also involved in carbon capture and  
storage project analyses in Alberta.  
In order to restrict water consumption on the Surmont (50%) in situ  
project, the Group has been working with the operator to optimize  
water use and recycling. For phase 2 of the project, which is  
scheduled to begin production in 2015, the selected option is  
expected to permit water to be withdrawn only from saline aquifers  
and not from freshwater aquifers or rivers, which will lead to  
additional processing costs. On Joslyn North (38.25%, operator),  
TOTAL has committed to building a freshwater storage facility  
sufficient for ninety days of production, in order to reduce  
withdrawals from the Athabasca River in low flow periods.  
Mindful of its responsibilities to its stakeholders and neighbors, and  
particularly the First Nations, TOTAL opened a permanent office in  
Fort McMurray in 2006. Since that time, the Group has entered into  
socioeconomic agreements with the Fort McKay, Athabasca  
Chipewyan and Mikisew Cree First Nations, and with the Regional  
Municipality of Wood Buffalo. These reflect TOTAL’s commitment to  
engaging in dialogue with the communities living near its facilities  
and allowing them to benefit from the economic impact of its  
activities (see point 3.1. of this Chapter).  
The Group is also involved in oil industry initiatives to improve  
management of the waste associated with developing oil sand  
mines, which has historically been stored in tailing ponds. For  
Joslyn, TOTAL is planning to use processes to separate waste  
flows and thicken the finest waste, and even flocculation and  
For more information, visit;  
total-ep-canada.com/csr/responsibility.asp; total.com;  
and Chapter 2.1.7.2. of the 2013 Registration Document.  
190  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Other social, community development and environmental information  
7
4.2. TOTAL and shale gas  
TOTAL has stakes either as operator or as partner in several shale  
gas exploration and production licenses in the United Kingdom,  
Poland, Denmark, United States, Argentina, Uruguay, China and  
Australia.  
and Gas Producers association, which entails publishing information  
about fracturing fluids (ngsfacts.org). TOTAL believes that shale gas  
will have a place in the European energy mix, if the exploration  
campaigns confirm the economic viability of this resource in Europe.  
In every country where the Group has operations, its Environmental  
charter and the Societal directive, backed by its compliance with  
local legislation, provide the framework for its operations.  
In the United States, TOTAL is a partner in the appraisal,  
development and production of shale gas with licenses in the  
Barnett (Texas) and Utica (Ohio) plays.  
The environmental challenges associated with shale gas development  
include reducing the quantity and impact of chemical additives,  
optimizing water management, and reducing the visual impact and  
disturbance caused by the operations. TOTAL’s operational and  
R&D teams are working to find appropriate technological solutions.  
In Argentina, TOTAL has stakes either as operator or partner in several  
shale gas licenses in the Neuquén basin.  
In Uruguay, TOTAL is present as operator in two exploration  
licenses located primarily in the Artigas province in the northwest of  
the country. The work planned includes geological, geochemical  
and environmental surveys.  
In Europe, where TOTAL has stakes in Denmark and Poland as  
operator, and in the United Kingdom where it has stakes since  
January 2014, the Group is focusing its efforts on listening to  
the various contacts so that the operations can proceed in a way  
that is acceptable to all stakeholders. TOTAL has also made a  
commitment to be more transparent, whether by providing  
information about projects (see the site dedicated to Danish  
licenses – skifergas.dk) or by supporting the initiative of the Oil  
In Australia, TOTAL is present in four shale gas exploration licenses  
in the South Georgina basin in the center of the country. TOTAL can  
increase its stake to 68% and become the operator in the event of  
development.  
In China, TOTAL signed an agreement in 2013 to study the shale gas  
potential in the Xuancheng license, 300 km to the west of Shanghai.  
4.3. TOTAL and the Arctic  
According to a survey published by the USGS (United States  
Geological Survey) in 2012, the Arctic might hold 13% of the  
world’s undiscovered conventional oil resources and 30% of its  
undiscovered gas resources. These substantial resources could  
help to meet the rise in demand for energy in the coming decades.  
At the same time, TOTAL is involved in research into the specific  
issues in the Arctic, in particular through its “Grands froids” (deep  
cold) R&D program. TOTAL is also taking part in the Joint Industry  
Program that brings together oil companies and scientific organizations  
in research into the means of preventing, detecting and responding  
to accidental pollution by hydrocarbons.  
For exploration and production in the Arctic, major challenges must  
be overcome given the difficult weather and oceanographic  
conditions, logistical constraints and the nature of the technologies  
to be deployed in a particularly sensitive ecosystem.  
The Group is involved in various projects, including in Norway  
(Snøhvit, active exploration in the Barents sea) and in Russia  
(Kharyaga, Yamal LNG, Termokarstovoye).  
TOTAL currently does not conduct any exploration activities in oil  
fields under the ice cap.  
4.4. TOTAL and Western Sahara  
Off the coast of Western Sahara, Morocco awarded an authorization  
of reconnaissance for the Anzarane Offshore Block in December 2011  
to the Office National Marocain des Hydrocarbures et des Mines  
At the time of the extension of the authorization of reconnaissance  
in December 2013, Total E&P Maroc signed with ONHYM a joint  
public declaration and a memorandum of understanding. In the joint  
declaration, the Moroccan party emphasizes its commitment to  
comply with the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,  
particularly as regards consultation with the local populations and  
the benefit they will derive from the exploration and mining of  
natural resources. The memorandum of understanding outlines  
Corporate Social Responsibility principles for the prospecting  
period and for any subsequent phases.  
(ONHYM – National Moroccan Bureau of Petroleum and Mines) and  
Total E&P Maroc. This authorization was extended for another year,  
first in December 2012 and then again in December 2013. The  
authorization of reconnaissance for the Anzarane Offshore Block is  
not an oil contract given that it covers only geological and  
geophysical studies.  
To date, preliminary geological studies have been carried out and  
a 3D seismic survey over an area of 5,900 km² was conducted by  
ONHYM between November 2012 and July 2013. At this stage,  
the oil and gas potential of the area has not yet been assessed.  
Several more months will be needed to process and interpret the  
seismic data, which had led to the extension of the authorization  
of reconnaissance.  
In the Western Sahara region where the Anzarane Offshore Block is  
located, as in other places where it operates, TOTAL complies with  
the applicable laws and international standards mentioned in the  
Group’s Code of Conduct, particularly those related to human rights.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
191  
Social and environmental information  
7
Reporting scopes and method  
5. Reporting scopes and method  
5.1. Reporting Guidance  
The Group reporting procedures consist of:  
These documents are available to all TOTAL subsidiaries.  
Abridged versions of the environmental and social reporting  
handbooks can be downloaded from the TOTAL website  
for social indicators, a practical handbook titled “Corporate  
Social Reporting Protocol and Method”;  
(Publications). The complete versions can be consulted at  
for Industrial Safety indicators, the Corporate Guidance on Event  
and Statistical Reporting; and  
Corporate headquarters, in the relevant departments.  
for environmental indicators, a Group reporting procedure,  
together with specific instructions for the sectors.  
5.2. Scopes  
In 2013, environmental reporting covered all activities, sites  
and industrial assets in which TOTAL, directly or through one of  
its subsidiaries, is the operator (either operates or contractually  
manages the operations) as of December 31, 2013. Equity  
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are the only data which are  
published on the “equity” perimeter. This perimeter, which is  
different from the “operated domain” mentioned above, includes all  
the assets in which TOTAL has a financial interest with rights over  
all or part of the production (financial interest without operational  
responsibility nor rights on all or part of the production do not lead  
to the incorporation of GHG emissions).  
The Worldwide Human Resources Survey is an annual survey  
which comprises approximately 100 indicators in addition to those  
used in the Global Workforce Analysis. The indicators are selected  
in cooperation with the businesses and cover major components  
of the Group Human Resources policy, such as mobility, career  
management, training, employee dialogue, Code of Conduct  
application, health, compensation, retirement benefits and insurance.  
The survey covers a representative sample of the consolidated  
perimeter. The data published in this Registration Document are  
extracted from the most recent survey, carried out in December 2013  
and January 2014; 149 companies representing 90% of the  
consolidated Group workforce, operating in fifty-eight countries,  
replied to the survey. Both surveys are conducted using the same  
information system introduced at the end of 2003, and undergo  
similar internal control and validation processes.  
Safety reporting covers all TOTAL employees, as well as employees  
of contractors working at Group-operated sites. Each site submits  
its safety reporting to the relevant business unit. The data is then  
consolidated at the business level and every month at the Corporate  
level. In 2013, the Group safety reporting scope covered 528 million  
hours worked, equivalent to around 310,000 people.  
5.2.1. Consolidation Method  
The occupational diseases reporting covers the Group personnel  
and diseases are reported according to the regulation applicable in  
the country of operation of each entity. Each site sends its reporting  
on occupational diseases to the operational entity it reports to.  
Statistics are consolidated at sector level and reported to the Group  
once a year.  
In the scopes defined above, industrial safety and social data are  
fully consolidated. Environmental indicators consolidate 100% of  
the emissions of Group operated sites for the “operated” indicators.  
GHG emissions are also published in equity share, that is the  
consolidation of the Group part of emissions for all assets in which  
the Group has a financial interest or rights to production.  
Social reporting is based on two resources – the Global Workforce  
Analysis and the Worldwide Human Resources Survey.  
5.2.2. Changes in Scope  
The Global Workforce Analysis is conducted twice a year, on  
June 30 and December 31, in all fully consolidated companies  
owned 50% or more and consolidated by global integration  
included in the Registration Document. The survey mainly covers  
worldwide workforces, hiring under permanent and fixed-term  
contracts (non-French equivalents of contrats à durée déterminée  
ou indéterminée), nationality, and employee hires and departures.  
This survey produces a breakdown of the workforce by gender,  
category (managers and other employees), age and nationality.  
For social and environmental indicators, the indicators are  
calculated on the basis of the perimeter of the Group as of  
December 31, 2013. For safety indicators, acquisitions  
are taken into account as soon as possible and at the latest  
on January 1 of the following year, and divestments are taken  
into account at the end of the quarter preceding their effective date  
of implementation. Restatement of previous years published data,  
unless there is a specific statement, is now limited to changes  
of methodology.  
192  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Social and environmental information  
Reporting scopes and method  
7
5.3. Principles  
5.3.1. Indicator Selection and Relevance  
5.3.3. Methods  
The data published in the Registration Document are intended to  
inform stakeholders about TOTAL’s Corporate Social Responsibility  
performance for the year in question. The environmental indicators  
include Corporate performance indicators in line with the IPIECA  
reporting guidance, updated in 2010. The indicators have been  
selected in order to track:  
The methods may be adjusted to reflect the diversity of TOTAL’s  
activities, recent integration of subsidiaries, lack of regulations  
or standardized international definitions, practical procedures for  
collecting data, or changes in methods.  
5.3.4. Consolidation and Internal Controls  
TOTAL’s commitments and policies, and their effects in the  
domains of safety, environment, social, etc.);  
Environmental, social and Industrial Safety data are consolidated  
and checked by each business unit and business segment, and  
then at Corporate level. Data pertaining to certain specific indicators  
are calculated directly by the business segments. These processes  
undergo regular internal audits.  
performance relative to TOTAL’s principal challenges and  
impacts; and  
information required by legislative and regulatory obligations  
(article L. 225-102-1 of the French Commercial Law, such  
as modified in 2010 by article 225 of the Grenelle II law).  
5.3.5. External Verification  
Since 2011, the verification scope covers the forty-two quantitative  
and/or qualitative information categories as stated by article  
R. 225-105-1 of the French Commercial Law. The external verification  
is performed at Group and business levels, as well as in a sample  
of business units in and outside France, selected each year in line  
with their relative contribution to the Group totals, previous years’  
results and a risk analysis. The auditor’s independence is defined  
by legislation and the professions’ Rules of Professional Conduct  
and/or a Committee of impartiality.  
5
.3.2. Terminology used in Social Reporting  
Outside of France, management staff (cadre) refers to any  
employee whose job level is the equivalent of 300 or more Hay  
points. Permanent contracts correspond to contrats à durée  
indéterminée (CDI) and fixed-term contracts to contrats à durée  
determinée (CDD), according to the terminology used in the social  
reporting.  
Managed Scope: all subsidiaries in which one or more Group  
companies own a stake of 50% or more, i.e., 496 companies in  
Since 2005, the Group has its main environmental and social  
performance indicators externally verified. The units with the largest  
workforces and that contribute significantly to environmental  
indicators have been audited several times since this verification  
process has been implemented.  
124 countries as of December 31, 2013.  
Consolidated Scope: all subsidiaries fully consolidated as in the  
Registration Document, i.e., 355 companies in 101 countries as  
of December 31, 2013.  
5.4. Details of certain indicators  
5
.4.1. Environmental Indicators  
GHG: the six gases of the Kyoto protocol are counted, which are  
CO , CH , N O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6, with their respective GWP  
2
4
2
Personnel in charge of the environment: it is a matter of identifying  
the persons in charge of the environment in the HSE departments  
of the sites, and if any, the staff of research centers working on this  
theme, the laboratories of sites (for environmental analysis), effluent  
liquid and gaseous emission processing departments, the department  
responsible for the management (and possibly internal processing)  
of waste, departments and entities charged with rehabilitation of sites.  
(Global Warming Potential) as described by the 1995 GIEC report.  
GHG scope 2: the emission factors applied are world averages:  
3.2 Mt CO -eq/Mtep for steam and 0.4 t CO -eq/MWh for  
2
2
electricity. This reporting is only applicable to the operated perimeter.  
GHG in equity share: GHG emissions of non-significant assets are  
excluded, for which the Group equity share is less than 10% and  
ISO sites: sites covered by an ISO 14001 certificate that is valid,  
for which emissions in Group share are less than 50 kt CO -eq/year.  
2
some certificates covering several sites.  
TOTAL relies on the information provided by its partners who  
operate its non-operated assets. In cases where this information is  
not available, estimates are made based on past data, budget data  
or by pro rata with similar assets.  
Fresh water: water with salinity below 1.5 g/l.  
Hydrocarbon spills: spills with a volume greater than 1 b (159 l)  
are counted. These are accidental spills of which at least part of the  
volume spilt reaches the natural environment (including non-waterproof  
ground). Spills resulting from sabotage or malicious acts are included.  
Spills which remain in a confined watertight containment system  
are excluded.  
Material loss rate: this rate corresponds to the net sum of materials  
extracted or consumed which are neither auto-consumed energy  
nor sold to a client, divided by the sum of transformed material.  
In the case of Exploration & Production, this rate is calculated by  
the ratio of the sum of identified losses to the sum of extracted  
materials. Petrochemicals considers that this new indicator is not  
yet sufficiently reliable to be published.  
Waste: the contaminated soil excavated and removed from active sites  
to be treated externally is counted as waste. But drilling debris, mining  
cuttings or soil polluted in inactive sites are not counted as waste.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
193  
 
Social and environmental information  
7
Reporting scopes and method  
Oil Spill Preparedness:  
An oil spill scenario is deemed “important” as soon as its  
consequences are on a small scale and with limited impacts on  
the environment (orders of magnitude of several hundred meters  
of beaches impacted, and several tons of hydrocarbons,  
typically).  
An oil spill preparedness plan is deemed operational if it describes  
the alert mechanisms, if it is based on pollution scenarios that  
stem from the risk analyses and if it describes mitigation strategies  
that are adapted to each scenario, if it defines the technical and  
organizational means, internal and external, to be implemented  
and, lastly, if it mentions elements to be taken into account to  
implement a follow-up of the environmental impacts of the pollution.  
Oil spill preparedness exercise: only exercises conducted  
on the basis of one of the scenarios identified in the oil spill  
preparedness plan and which are played out until the stage  
of deployment of equipment are counted for this indicator.  
194  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Social and environmental information  
Third party assurance report  
7
6. Third party assurance report  
Independent verifier’s report on consolidated social, environmental and societal information presented in the Management Report.  
This is a free translation into English of the original report issued in the French language and it is provided solely for the convenience of  
English speaking users. This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and professional  
standards applicable in France.  
To the shareholders,  
In our quality as an independent verifier of which the admissibility of the application for accreditation has been accepted by the COFRAC,  
under the number n° 3-1050, and as a member of the network of one of the statutory auditors of Total, we present our report on the  
consolidated social, environmental and societal information for the year ended on the December 31 2013, presented in the Management  
Report (Chapter 7. of the Registration Document) hereafter referred to as the “CSR Information” pursuant to the provisions of the article  
L.225-102-1 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce).  
Responsibility of the Company  
It is the responsibility of the executive board to establish a Management Report including CSR Information referred to in the Article R. 225-105-1  
of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce), in accordance with the Human Resources and environment, health and safety protocols  
used by the Company (the “Criteria”), in their versions dated summer 2013, and of which a summary is included in the Management Report  
(Chapter 7.5. of the Registration Document) (the “Methodological note”) and available on request at the Company’s headquarters.  
Independence and quality control  
Our independence is defined by regulatory requirements, the Code of Ethics of our profession as well as the provisions in the Article L. 822-11  
of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce). In addition, we have implemented a quality control system including documented  
policies and procedures to ensure compliance with ethical standards, professional standards and applicable laws and regulations.  
Responsibility of the independent verifier  
It is our role, based on our work:  
To attest whether the required CSR Information is present in the Management Report or, in the case of its omission, that an appropriate  
explanation has been provided, in accordance with the third paragraph of R. 225-105 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce)  
(Attestation of presence of CSR Information);  
To express a limited assurance on whether the CSR Information is presented, in all material aspects, in accordance with the Criteria.  
Our verification work was undertaken by a team of nine people and took place from September 2013 to March 2014 for an estimated time  
period of thirty weeks.  
We undertook the work described below in accordance with the professional standards applicable in France and the Order of 13 May 2013  
determining the conditions under which an independent third-party verifier conduct its mission, and in relation to the opinion of fairness and  
the reasonable assurance report, in accordance with the international standard ISAE 3000(1)  
.
6.1. Attestation of presence of CSR Information  
We obtained an understanding of the Company’s CSR issues, based on interviews with the management of relevant departments,  
a presentation of the Company’s strategy on Sustainable Development based on the social and environmental consequences linked  
to the activities of the Company and its societal commitments, as well as, where appropriate, resulting actions or programmes.  
We have compared the information presented in the Management Report with the list as provided for in the Article R. 225-105-1 of the  
French Commercial Code (Code de commerce).  
(1) ISAE 3000 – Assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical information.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
195  
Social and environmental information  
7
Third party assurance report  
In the absence of certain consolidated information, we have verified that the explanations were provided in accordance with the provisions  
in Article R. 225-105-1, paragraph 3, of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce).  
We verified that the information covers the consolidated perimeter, namely the entity and its subsidiaries, as aligned with the meaning  
of the Article L.233-1 and the entities which it controls, as aligned with the meaning of the Article L.233-3 of the French Commercial Code  
(Code de commerce), with the limitations specified in the Methodological Note of the Management Report (Chapter 7.5. of the Registration  
Document), and notably the Worldwide Human Resources Survey which covers 90% of the employees.  
Based on this work, and given the limitations mentioned above, we confirm the presence in the Management Report of the required CSR  
Information.  
6.2. Limited assurance on CSR Information  
Nature and scope of the work  
We undertook about forty interviews with about thirty people responsible for the preparation of CSR Information in the Sustainable  
Development and Environment Division, Industrial Safety Division and Human Resources Division, in charge of the data collection process  
and, if applicable, the people responsible for internal control processes and risk management, in order to:  
Assess the suitability of the Criteria for reporting, in relation to their relevance, completeness, reliability, neutrality, and understandability,  
taking into consideration, if relevant, industry standards;  
Verify the implementation of the process for the collection, compilation, processing and control for completeness and consistency of the  
CSR Information and identify the procedures for internal control and risk management related to the preparation of the CSR Information.  
We determined the nature and extent of our tests and inspections based on the nature and importance of the CSR Information, in relation to  
the characteristics of the Company, its social and environmental issues, its strategy in relation to Sustainable Development and industry best  
practices.  
For the CSR Information which we considered the most important(1)  
:
At the level of the consolidated entity and the three segments, we consulted documentary sources and conducted interviews to corroborate  
the qualitative information (organization, policies, actions, etc.), we implemented analytical procedures on the quantitative information and  
verified, on a test basis, the calculations and the compilation of the information, and also verified their coherence and consistency with the  
other information presented in the Management Report;  
(2)  
At the level of the representative selection of sites that we selected , based on their activity, their contribution to the consolidated indicators,  
their location and a risk analysis, we undertook interviews to verify the correct application of the procedures and undertook detailed tests  
on the basis of samples, consisting in verifying the calculations made and linking them with supporting documentation. The sample selected  
therefore represented on average 10% of the total workforce and 25% of greenhouse gases emissions.  
We consider that the sampling methods and size of the sample that we considered by exercising our professional judgment allows us  
to express a limited assurance conclusion; an assurance of a higher level would have required more extensive verification work. Due to the  
necessary use of sampling techniques and other limitations inherent in the functioning of any information and internal control system, the risk  
of non-detection of a significant anomaly in the CSR Information cannot be entirely eliminated.  
(
(
1) With respect to Total Group activities, size of the company and affiliates locations, we have considered as important all information published in chapter 7 of the management report.  
2) Social and environmental data verification: TUCN Nigeria, Total E&P Austral, Total E&P Myanmar, Raffinerie de Normandie, TRM Leuna, Sunpower Philippines Fab2, Total Nigeria PLC.  
Environmental data verification: Total E&P Norge (remote audit performed only on GHG on equity basis), CCP Drocourt, Total Olefins Antwerpen, Hutchinson Lodz I, Port-Arthur Refinery  
remote audit).  
Social data verification: Lubrifiants Argentine, TOTAL Deutschland GmbH Marketing, Hutchinson Poland.  
(
.
196  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Social and environmental information  
Third party assurance report  
7
Qualification expressed  
We express qualification on the following point: the number of valid analysis results on the sulfur content of fuel gas burnt by some subsidiaries of  
Exploration & Production activity should be improved regarding the variability of this parameter to ensure a better management of SO emissions.  
2
Conclusion  
Based on our work, and under this qualification, we have not identified any significant misstatement that causes us to believe that the CSR  
Information, taken together, have not been fairly presented, in compliance with the Criteria.  
Observations  
Without qualifying our conclusion above, we draw your attention to the following points:  
Within New Energies (Energies Nouvelles) business, which account for 13% of the audited workforce, we observed a limited use  
of the reporting Guidelines generating an overall uncertainty on the number of days of training, due to the contribution of this business  
on the selection of audited sites.  
With respect to the rate of absenteeism for medical reasons, we identified some differences in understanding of the calculation  
methodology.  
Methods to calculate the proportion of wastes by treatment technologies are not consistent between some of the audited sites.  
Paris-La Défense, the 26 March 2014  
The Independent Verifier  
ERNST & YOUNG et Associés  
French original signed by:  
Christophe Schmeitzky Partner  
Sustainable Development  
Bruno Perrin Partner  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
197  
198  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
6.TOTAL et ses actionnaires  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
TOTAL and its shareholders  
1.  
Listing details  
200  
1
1
.1.  
.2.  
Listing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .200  
Share performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .201  
2.  
Dividend  
204  
2.1.  
2.2.  
2.3.  
Dividend policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .204  
Dividend payment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205  
Coupons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .205  
3.  
Share buybacks  
206  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
Share buybacks and cancellations in 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .206  
Board’s report on share buybacks and sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .206  
2014-2015 share buyback program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .208  
4.  
Shareholders  
210  
4.1.  
4.2.  
4.3.  
4.4.  
4.5.  
4.6.  
4.7.  
4.8.  
4.9.  
Relationship between TOTAL and the French State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .210  
Merger of TOTAL with PetroFina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .210  
Merger of TotalFina with Elf Aquitaine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .210  
Major shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .211  
Treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .212  
Shares held by members of the administrative and management bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213  
Employee shareholding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213  
Shareholding structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213  
Regulated agreements and undertakings and related party transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .213  
5.  
Information for foreign shareholders  
214  
5
5
.1.  
.2.  
American holders of ADRs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .214  
Non-resident shareholders (other than American shareholders) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .214  
6.  
Investor Relations  
216  
6.1.  
6.2.  
6.3.  
6.4.  
6.5.  
6.6.  
6.7.  
6.8.  
Communication policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216  
Relationships with institutional investors and financial analysts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216  
A quality relationship serving individual shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216  
Registered shareholding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .217  
Individual Shareholders Department Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .218  
2014 Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .218  
2015 Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .219  
Investor Relations Department contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .219  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
199  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Listing details  
1. Listing details  
1.1. Listing  
1
.1.1. Exchanges  
1.1.7. Market capitalization  
(1)  
as of December 31, 2013  
Paris, New York, London and Brussels  
105.9 billion(2)  
145.7 billion(3)  
$
1.1.2. Codes  
ISIN  
FR0000120271  
TOTF.PA  
FP FP  
1
.1.8. Percentage of free float  
Reuters  
Bloomberg  
Datastream  
Mnémo  
As of December 31, 2013, the free float factor determined by  
Euronext for calculating TOTAL’s weight in the CAC 40 was 90%.  
The free float factor determined by Euro Stoxx for calculating  
TOTAL’s weight in the Euro Stoxx 50 was 95%.  
F: TAL  
FP  
1
.1.3. Included in the following stock indexes  
1.1.9. Par value  
CAC 40, Euro Stoxx 50, Stoxx Europe 50, DJ Global Titans  
2.50.  
1
.1.4. Included in the following ESG indexes  
(
Environment, Social, Governance)  
1.1.10. Credit ratings of the long-term and  
short-term debt (long term/outlook/short term)  
DJSI World, DJSI Europe, FTSE4Good, ASPI  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
1
.1.5. Weight in the main indexes  
Standard & Poor’s  
Moody’s  
AA-/Stable/A-1+  
Aa1/Neg/P-1  
AA-/Stable/A-1+  
Aa1/Neg/P-1  
as of December 31, 2013  
CAC 40  
11.3%  
5.2%  
3.2%  
1.7%  
Largest weight in the index  
Largest weight in the index  
7th largest weight in the index  
36th largest weight in the index  
EURO STOXX 50  
STOXX EUROPE 50  
DJ GLOBAL TITANS  
1
.1.6. Market capitalization on Euronext Paris  
and in the euro zone as of December 31, 2013  
TOTAL has the largest capitalization on the Euronext Paris regulated  
market. Based on the market capitalization of the companies  
that make up the Euro Stoxx 50, the largest market capitalizations  
in the euro zone are as follows (a)  
:
As of December 31, 2013  
(B)  
AB InBev  
TOTAL  
Sanofi  
Volkswagen  
Unilever  
Siemens  
124.2  
105.9  
102.6  
92.8  
89.4  
87.5  
(a) Source: Bloomberg for companies other than TOTAL.  
(
(
(
1) Shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013: 2,377,678,160.  
2) TOTAL closing share price in Paris as of December 31, 2013: 44.53.  
3) TOTAL closing ADR price in New York as of December 31, 2013: $61.27.  
200  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Listing details  
8
1.2. Share performance  
TOTAL share price in Paris (2010-2013)  
(in euros)  
TOTAL ADR price in New York (2010-2013)  
(in dollars)  
TOTAL  
CAC 40  
Euro Stoxx 50  
TOTAL  
Dow Jones  
140  
130  
120  
110  
100  
160  
1
40  
20  
1
100  
9
0
0
0
0
8
0
8
7
6
60  
40  
2
010  
2011  
2012  
2013  
2010  
2011  
2012  
2013  
1
.2.1. Arkema spin-off  
1.2.2. Change in share prices in Europe of  
the major European oil companies between  
January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013  
Within the framework of the spin-off of Arkema’s chemical activities  
from the Group’s other chemical activities, the Shareholders’ Meeting  
of May 12, 2006 approved TOTAL S.A.’s contribution to Arkema,  
under the regulation governing spin-offs, of all its interests in  
the businesses included under Arkema’s scope, as well as the  
allocation for each TOTAL share of an allotment right for Arkema  
shares, with 10 allotment rights entitling the holder to one Arkema  
share. Since May 18, 2006, Arkema’s shares have been traded  
on Euronext Paris.  
(
closing price in local currency)  
TOTAL (euro)  
+14.2%  
-0.3%  
+4.8%  
+14.9%  
-4.6%  
Royal Dutch Shell A (euro)  
Royal Dutch Shell B (pound sterling)  
BP (pound sterling)  
ENI (euro)  
Source: Bloomberg.  
Pursuant to the provisions of the notice prior to the sale of unclaimed  
shares (Avis préalable à la mise en vente de titres non réclamés)  
published on August 3, 2006 in the French newspaper Les Echos,  
Arkema shares corresponding to allotment rights for fractional  
shares which were unclaimed as of August 3, 2008 were sold  
on Euronext Paris at an average price of 32.5721 per share.  
As a result, from August 3, 2008, the indemnity price per share  
of allotment rights for Arkema shares is 3.25721 (NYSE Euronext  
notice No. PAR_20080812_02958_EUR). BNP Paribas Securities  
Services paid an indemnity to the financial intermediaries on  
remittance of corresponding allotment rights for Arkema shares.  
1
.2.3. Change in share prices in the United  
States (ADR quotes for European companies)  
of the major international oil companies between  
January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013  
(closing price in dollars)  
TOTAL  
ExxonMobil  
Chevron  
Royal Dutch Shell A  
Royal Dutch Shell B  
BP  
+17.8%  
+16.9%  
+15.5%  
+3.4%  
+6.0%  
+16.7%  
-1.3%  
As from August 4, 2018, the unclaimed amounts will be handed  
over to the French Caisse des dépôts et consignations where  
the holders will still be able to claim them for a period of 20 years.  
After this time limit, the amounts will permanently become the  
property of the French State.  
ENI  
ConocoPhillips  
+21.8%  
Source: Bloomberg.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
201  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Listing details  
1.2.4. Appreciation of a portfolio invested in TOTAL shares  
Net yield of 7.25% per year over 10 years (excluding tax credit).  
1.2.5. Multiplication of the initial investment by 2 over 10 years  
As of December 31, 2013, for every 1,000 invested in TOTAL shares by an individual residing in France, assuming that the net dividends  
(excluding the tax credit) are reinvested in TOTAL shares, and excluding tax and social withholding.  
Average annual  
Value as of  
December 31, 2013  
of 1,000 invested  
total return  
CAC 40(b)  
Investment date  
TOTAL(a)  
TOTAL  
CAC 40  
1
5
1
1
year  
years  
0 years  
5 years  
+20.65%  
+8.49%  
+7.25%  
+10.06%  
+20.95%  
+9.37%  
+5.06%  
+3.17%  
1,207  
1,503  
2,014  
4,212  
1,210  
1,565  
1,638  
1,597  
(a) TOTAL’s share prices, used for the calculation of the total return (including dividends and appreciation), take into account the adjustment made by Euronext Paris in 2006 ex Arkema’s share  
allocation rights.  
(b) CAC 40 quotes taken into account to calculate the total return (including dividends and appreciation) include all dividends distributed by the companies that are in the index.  
1.2.6. Information summary  
Share price ()  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2010  
2009  
Highest (during regular trading session)  
Lowest (during regular trading session)  
45.670  
35.175  
42.97  
33.42  
44.55  
29.40  
46.74  
35.66  
45.79  
34.25  
End of the year (closing)  
Average of the last 30 trading sessions (closing)  
44.53  
43.60  
39.01  
38.73  
39.50  
37.65  
39.65  
39.16  
45.01  
43.19  
Trading volume (average per session)(a)  
Euronext Paris  
New York Stock Exchange (number of ADRs)  
4,439,725  
1,371,780  
5,622,504  
3,291,705  
6,565,732  
4,245,743  
6,808,245  
3,329,778  
7,014,959  
2,396,192  
Dividend(b)  
2.38  
2.34  
2.28  
2.28  
2.28  
(
(
a) Number of shares traded. Source: Euronext Paris, NYSE, composite price.  
b) The 2013 dividend is subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014. This amount includes the three quarterly interim dividends paid for fiscal year 2013. The interim  
dividends were 0.59 per share. They were paid on September 27, 2013, December 19, 2013 and March 27, 2014, and are eligible for the 40% rebate applicable to individuals residing  
in France for tax purposes, as stipulated in Article 158 of the French General Tax Code.  
202  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Listing details  
8
1
.2.7. TOTAL share price over the past 18 months (Euronext Paris)(a)  
Average daily  
volume(  
Highest price  
quoted  
Lowest price  
quoted  
()  
b)  
()  
September 2012  
October 2012  
November 2012  
December 2012  
January 2013  
February 2013  
March 2013  
April 2013  
May 2013  
June 2013  
July 2013  
5,905,512  
4,360,378  
4,221,212  
4,217,316  
3,645,252  
5,430,672  
4,704,884  
4,908,214  
4,440,556  
5,158,472  
3,851,367  
4,060,453  
4,574,553  
3,895,609  
3,594,159  
5,311,783  
4,152,073  
4,680,774  
41.995  
40.110  
39.695  
39.940  
40.820  
40.480  
39.595  
38.345  
40.400  
39.130  
40.390  
42.900  
43.785  
45.670  
45.140  
44.700  
44.745  
47.030  
47.030  
38.600  
37.970  
36.925  
38.060  
39.030  
37.040  
37.130  
35.175  
37.815  
35.680  
36.615  
39.690  
41.435  
42.050  
43.440  
41.050  
41.650  
41.310  
August 2013  
September 2013  
October 2013  
November 2013  
December 2013  
January 2014  
February 2014  
Maximum for the period  
Minimum for the period  
35.175  
(
(
a) Source: Euronext Paris.  
b) Number of shares traded.  
TOTAL share price at closing on Euronext Paris  
)  
(
2
012  
2013  
46  
44  
42  
40  
38  
36  
34  
32  
TOTAL average daily volume traded on Euronext Paris  
in millions of shares)  
(
2
012  
2013  
7
.70  
7
.18  
6
.85  
6
.32  
5
.93  
6.02  
5.91  
5
.43  
4.70  
5
.16  
5.31  
4
.91  
4
.68  
4.57  
.06  
4
.36  
4.22 4.22  
4.44  
4
.23  
4
3
.85  
3.90  
3.59  
3
.65  
ch  
ch  
Mar  
April  
May  
June  
July  
April  
May  
June  
July  
August  
September  
Mar  
August  
September  
January  
October  
Novemb eDr ecember  
January  
October  
Novemb eDr ecember  
February  
February  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
203  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Dividend  
2. Dividend  
2.1. Dividend policy  
2
.1.1. Dividend payment policy  
Subject to the applicable legislative and regulatory provisions,  
and pending the approval by the Board of Directors for the interim  
dividends and by the shareholders at the Shareholders’ Meeting  
for the accounts and the final dividend, the ex-date calendar for the  
interim quarterly dividends and the final dividend for fiscal year 2014  
is expected to be as follows:  
On October 28, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to adopt a  
new policy based on quarterly dividend payments starting in 2011.  
2.1.2. 2013 and 2014 dividends  
st  
TOTAL paid three quarterly interim dividends for fiscal year 2013:  
– 1 interim dividend: September 23, 2014;  
2nd interim dividend: December 15, 2014;  
3rd interim dividend: March 23, 2015;  
Remainder: June 8, 2015.  
the first quarterly interim dividend of 0.59 per share for fiscal  
year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2013,  
was paid in cash on September 27, 2013 (the ex-dividend date  
was September 24, 2013);  
The provisional ex-dividend dates above relate to the TOTAL  
shares traded on the NYSE Euronext Paris.  
the second quarterly interim dividend of 0.59 per share for  
fiscal year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on July 25,  
Dividends in euros for the last five fiscal years  
2013, was paid in cash on December 19, 2013 (the ex-dividend  
()  
date was December 16, 2013);  
(1)  
2.38  
2.34  
the third quarterly interim dividend of 0.59 per share for fiscal  
year 2013, approved by the Board of Directors on October 30, 2013,  
was paid in cash on March 27, 2014 (the ex-dividend date was  
March 24, 2014).  
2.28  
2.28  
2.28  
For fiscal year 2013, TOTAL intends to continue its dividend policy.  
As a result, the Board of Directors proposes a dividend of 2.38  
per share (+1.7% compared to 2012) at the Shareholders’ Meeting  
on May 16, 2014, including a remainder of 0.61 per share  
(+3.4% compared to the previous quarter) with an ex-dividend date  
on June 2, 2014 and a payment on June 5, 2014.  
2
009  
Remainder  
2010  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Interim dividend  
In 2013, TOTAL’s pay-out ratio was 50%(2). Changes in  
the pay-out ratio(3) over the past five years are as follows:  
66%  
50%  
50%  
45%  
43%  
2
009  
2010  
2011  
2012  
2013  
(
(
(
1) Pending approval at the May 16, 2014 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.  
2) Based on adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share of 4.73 and a dividend of 2.38 per share pending approval at the May 16, 2014 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.  
3) Based on adjusted fully-diluted earnings for the relevant year.  
204  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Dividend  
8
2.2. Dividend payment  
BNP Paribas Securities Services manages the payment of the dividend, which is made through financial intermediaries using the Euroclear  
France direct payment system.  
The Bank of New York Mellon (101 Barclay Street 22 W, New York, NY 10286, USA) manages the payment of dividends to holders of  
American Depositary Receipts (ADRs).  
2.2.1. Dividend payment on stock certificates  
TOTAL issued stock certificates (certificats représentatifs d’actions, “CRs”) as part of the public exchange offer for PetroFina shares.  
The CR is a stock certificate provided for by French rules, issued by Euroclear France, intended to circulate exclusively outside of France,  
and which may not be held by French residents. The CR is issued as a physical certificate, or registered in a custody account. It has the  
characteristics of a bearer security. The CR is freely convertible from a physical certificate into a security registered on a custody account  
and conversely. However, in compliance with the Belgian law of December 14, 2005 on the dematerialization of securities in Belgium,  
CRs may only be delivered in the form of a dematerialized certificate as from January 1, 2008, the effective date of the law. In addition,  
ING Belgique is the bank handling the payment of all coupons detached from outstanding CRs.  
No fees are applicable to the payment of coupons detached from CRs, except for any income or withholding taxes; the payment may be  
received at the teller windows of the following institutions:  
ING Belgique  
BNP Paribas Fortis Montagne du Parc 3, 1000 Brussels, Belgium  
KBC BANK N.V. Avenue du Port 2, 1080 Brussels, Belgium  
Avenue Marnix 24, 1000 Brussels, Belgium  
2.3. Coupons  
For the year ended  
Ex-dividend  
date  
Payment  
date  
Expiration  
date  
Nature and amount  
of the coupon  
Net amount  
()  
2007  
2008  
2009  
2010  
2011  
11/16/2007  
11/16/2007  
05/23/2008  
11/16/2012  
05/23/2013  
Interim dividend (no. 21)  
Remainder (no. 22)  
1
1.07  
0
5/20/2008  
11/14/2008  
5/19/2009  
11/13/2009  
5/27/2010  
11/12/2010  
5/23/2011  
09/19/2011  
11/19/2008  
05/22/2009  
11/19/2013  
05/22/2014  
Interim dividend (no. 23)  
Remainder (no. 24)  
1.14  
1.14  
0
11/18/2009  
06/01/2010  
11/18/2014  
06/01/2015  
Interim dividend (no. 25)  
Remainder (no. 26)  
1.14  
1.14  
0
11/17/2010  
05/26/2011  
11/17/2015  
05/26/2016  
Interim dividend (no. 27)  
Remainder (no. 28)  
1.14  
1.14  
0
09/22/2011  
12/22/2011  
03/22/2012  
06/21/2012  
09/22/2016  
12/22/2016  
03/22/2017  
06/21/2017  
Interim dividend (no. 29)  
Interim dividend (no. 30)  
Interim dividend (no. 31)  
Remainder (no. 32)  
0.57  
0.57  
0.57  
0.57  
12/19/2011  
03/19/2012  
06/18/2012  
2012  
09/24/2012  
09/27/2012  
12/20/2012  
03/21/2013  
06/27/2013  
09/27/2017  
12/20/2017  
03/21/2018  
06/27/2018  
Interim dividend (no. 33)  
Interim dividend (no. 34)  
Interim dividend (no. 35)  
Remainder (no. 36)  
0.57  
0.59  
0.59  
0.59  
12/17/2012  
03/18/2013  
06/24/2013  
2
013(a)  
09/24/2013  
09/27/2013  
12/19/2013  
03/27/2014  
06/05/2014  
09/27/2018  
12/19/2018  
03/27/2019  
06/05/2019  
Interim dividend (no. 37)  
Interim dividend (no. 38)  
Interim dividend (no. 39)  
Remainder (no. 40)  
0.59  
0.59  
0.59  
0.61  
12/16/2013  
03/24/2014  
06/02/2014  
(
a) A resolution will be submitted to the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 16, 2014 to pay a cash dividend of 2.38 per share for fiscal year 2013, including a remainder of 0.61 per share,  
with an ex-dividend date on June 2, 2014 and a payment date on June 5, 2014.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
205  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Share buybacks  
3. Share buybacks  
The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013, after acknowledging  
the report of the Board of Directors, authorized the Board of Directors,  
in accordance with the provisions of Article L. 225-209 of the French  
Commercial Code and of European Regulation 2273/2003 of  
December 22, 2003, to buy and sell the Company’s shares as part  
of a share buyback program. The maximum purchase price was set  
at 70 per share. The number of shares acquired may not exceed  
of eighteen months and replaced the previous authorization granted  
by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012.  
A resolution will be submitted to the Shareholders’ Meeting on  
May 16, 2014 to authorize trading in TOTAL shares through a share  
buyback program carried out in accordance with Article L. 225-209  
of the French Commercial Code and European Regulation 2273/2003  
of December 22, 2003. This program is described in point 3.3.  
of this Chapter.  
10% of the share capital. This authorization was granted for a period  
3.1. Share buybacks and cancellations in 2013  
In 2013, TOTAL bought back 4,414,200 of its own shares to cover commitments made in connection with restricted share grant plans, i.e.,  
approximately 0.19% of the share capital(1)  
.
Percentage of share capital bought back  
0.19%  
0.08%  
0
.0%  
0.0%  
0.0%  
2
009  
2010  
2011  
2012  
2013  
In addition, TOTAL S.A. did not cancel any shares in 2013.  
3.2. Board’s report on share buybacks and sales  
3
.2.1. Share buybacks during 2013  
3.2.2. Shares held in the name  
of the Company and its subsidiaries  
as of December 31, 2013  
Under the authorization granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting  
of May 17, 2013, 4,414,200 TOTAL shares, each with a par value  
of 2.50, were bought back by TOTAL S.A. in 2013, i.e., 0.19%  
of the share capital as of December 31, 2013. This buyback was  
completed at an average price of 40.57 per share, for a total cost  
of approximately 179.09 million, excluding transaction fees.  
This buyback is intended to cover the performance share grant plan  
approved by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013.  
As of December 31, 2013, the Company held 8,883,180 treasury  
shares, representing 0.37% of TOTAL’s share capital. By law, the  
voting rights and dividend rights of these shares are suspended.  
After taking into account the shares held by Group subsidiaries,  
which are entitled to a dividend but deprived of voting rights, the  
total number of TOTAL shares held by the Group as of December 31,  
2
013 was 109,214,448, representing 4.59% of TOTAL’s share capital,  
comprised of, on the one hand, 8,883,180 treasury shares, including  
,764,020 shares held to cover the performance share grant plans  
8
and 119,160 shares to be awarded under new share purchase  
option plans or new restricted share grant plans and, on the other  
hand, 100,331,268 shares held by subsidiaries.  
(1) Average share capital of year N = (share capital at December 31 N-1 + share capital at December 31 N)/2.  
206  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Share buybacks  
8
For shares bought back to be allocated to Company or Group  
Employees pursuant to the objectives referred to in Article 3 of EC  
Regulation 2273/2003 of December 22, 2003, note that, when  
such shares are held to cover share purchase option plans that  
have expired or performance share grants that have not been  
awarded at the end of the vesting period, they will be allocated to  
new TOTAL share purchase option plans or restricted share grant  
plans that may be approved by the Board of Directors.  
3.2.5. Reallocation for other approved  
purposes during fiscal year 2013  
Shares purchased by the Company under the authorization granted  
by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 17, 2013, or under previous  
authorizations, were not reallocated in 2013 to purposes other than  
those initially specified at the time of purchase.  
3
.2.6. Conditions for the buyback  
and use of derivative products  
3
.2.3. Transfer of shares during fiscal year 2013  
Between January 1, 2013 and February 28, 2014, the Company  
did not use any derivative products on the financial markets as part  
of the share buyback programs successively authorized by the  
Shareholders’ Meetings of May 11, 2012 and May 17, 2013.  
3,591,391 TOTAL shares were transferred in 2013 following the  
final award of TOTAL shares under the restricted share grant plans.  
3
.2.4. Cancellation of Company shares  
during fiscal year 2011, 2012 and 2013  
3
.2.7. Shares held in the name  
TOTAL S.A. did not cancel any shares in 2011, 2012 and 2013.  
of the Company and its subsidiaries  
as of February 28, 2014  
The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012 authorized the Board  
of Directors to reduce the share capital on one or more occasions  
by canceling shares held by the Company up to a maximum of  
As of February 28, 2014, the Company held 8,883,005 treasury  
shares, representing 0.37% of TOTAL’s share capital. By law, the  
voting rights and dividend rights of these shares are suspended.  
1
0% of the share capital over a 24-month period. As a result,  
based on 2,377,678,160 shares outstanding on December 31,  
013, the Company may cancel a maximum of 237,767,816  
After taking into account the shares held by Group subsidiaries, which  
are entitled to a dividend but deprived of voting rights, the total number  
of TOTAL shares held by the Group as of February 28, 2014 was  
2
shares before reaching the cancellation threshold of 10% of share  
capital canceled over a 24-month period.  
109,214,273, representing 4.59% of TOTAL’s share capital, comprised  
of, on the one hand, 8,883,005 treasury shares, including 8,764,020  
shares held to cover the performance share grant plans and 118,985  
shares to be awarded under new share purchase option plans or new  
restricted share grant plans and, on the other hand, 100,331,268  
shares held by subsidiaries.  
Summary table of transactions completed by the Company involving its own shares from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014(a)  
:
Cumulative gross movements Open positions as of February 28, 2014  
Purchases  
Sales  
Open purchase positions  
Open sales positions  
Number of shares  
4,414,200  
-
-
-
-
-
Bought calls  
Purchases  
Sold calls  
Sales  
Maximum average maturity  
Average transaction price ()  
Average exercise price  
Amounts ()  
-
40.57  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
179,087,553  
(
a) In compliance with the applicable regulations as of February 28, 2014, the period indicated begins on the day after the date used as a reference for the publication of information regarding  
the previous program published in the 2012 Registration Document.  
Moreover, 3,591,466 TOTAL shares were transferred between March 1, 2013 and February 28, 2014 following the final award of shares  
under the performance share grant plans.  
As of February 28, 2014  
Percentage of share capital held by TOTAL S.A.  
0.37%  
Number of shares held in portfolio(a)  
Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)  
Market value of the portfolio (M)(b)  
8,883,005  
353  
418  
Percentage of capital held by companies(c) of the Group  
4.59%  
Number of shares held in portfolio  
Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)  
Market value of the portfolio (M)(b)  
109,214,273  
3,379  
5,136  
(
(
(
a) TOTAL S.A. did not buy back any shares during the three trading days preceding February 28, 2014. As a result, TOTAL S.A. owns all the shares held in portfolio as of that date.  
b) Based on a closing price of 47.03 per share as of February 28, 2014.  
c) TOTAL S.A., Total Nucléaire, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
207  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Share buybacks  
3.3. 2014-2015 share buyback program  
3
.3.1. Description of the share buyback  
In case of a capital increase by capitalization of reserves and  
restricted share grants, and in case of a stock-split or a reverse-  
stock-split, this maximum price shall be adjusted by applying the  
ratio of the number of shares outstanding before the transaction  
to the number of shares outstanding after the transaction.  
program under Article 241-1 et seq. of the  
General Regulation of the French Financial  
Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés  
financiers – AMF)  
Objectives of the share buyback program:  
Pursuant to Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code,  
the maximum number of shares that may be bought under this  
authorization may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares  
outstanding as of the date on which this authorization is used.  
Purchases made by the Company may under no circumstances  
result in the Company holding more than 10% of the share capital,  
either directly or indirectly through indirect subsidiaries.  
reduce the Company’s capital through the cancellation of shares;  
honor the Company’s obligations related to securities convertible  
or exchangeable into Company shares;  
honor the Company’s obligations related to stock option  
programs or other share grants to the Company’s management  
or to employees of the Company or a Group subsidiary;  
Of the 2,377,678,160 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013,  
the Company held 8,883,180 shares directly and 100,331,268 shares  
indirectly through its subsidiaries, for a total of 109,214,448. Under these  
circumstances, the maximum number of shares that the Company  
could buy back is 128,553,368 shares, and the maximum amount that  
the Company may spend to acquire such shares is 8,998,735,760.  
deliver shares (by exchange, payment or otherwise) in  
connection with external growth operations; and  
stimulate the secondary market or the liquidity of the TOTAL  
share under a liquidity agreement.  
The purpose of this share buyback program will be to reduce the  
Company’s share capital or to allow the Company to fulfill its  
obligations related to:  
3
.3.2. Legal framework  
Implementation of this share buyback program, which is in line  
with Article L. 225-209 et seq. of the French Commercial Code,  
Article 241-1 et seq. of the General Regulation of the French  
Financial Markets Authority, and the provisions of European  
Regulation 2273/2003 of December 22, 2003, is subject to  
approval by the TOTAL S.A. Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16,  
– securities convertible or exchangeable into Company shares;  
share purchase option programs, restricted share grant plans,  
employee shareholding plans or company savings plans, or other  
share grants to management or employees of the Company  
or a Group company.  
2014 through the fourth resolution which reads as follows:  
Share buybacks may also be motivated by any of the market  
practices allowed by the French Financial Markets Authority, namely,  
as of December 31, 2013:  
Upon presentation of the report of the Board of Directors and  
certain information contained in the program description prepared  
in accordance with Article 241-1 et seq. of the General Regulation  
(
(
règlement général) of the French Financial Markets Authority  
Autorité des marchés financiers) and pursuant to the provisions  
– the delivery of shares (by exchange, payment or otherwise) in  
connection with external growth, merger, spin-off or contribution  
operations, without exceeding the limit stipulated in Article  
L. 225-209, paragraph 6, of the French Commercial Code,  
for merger, spin-off or contribution operations; or  
of Article L. 225-209 of the French Commercial Code, European  
Regulation 2273/2003 of December 22, 2003, and the General  
Regulation of the French Financial Markets Authority, the  
Shareholders’ Meeting, voting under conditions for quorum and  
majority required for ordinary general meetings, hereby authorizes  
the Board of Directors, with the option to sub-delegate such  
powers under the conditions provided by law, to buy or sell shares  
of the Company as part of a share buyback program.  
stimulation of the secondary market or the liquidity of the TOTAL  
share by an investment service provider under a liquidity  
agreement that complies with the ethics rules recognized by the  
French Financial Markets Authority.  
This program may also be used by the Company to trade in its own  
shares, either on or off the market, for any other authorized purpose  
or permitted market practice, or any practice which may be authorized  
by applicable laws or regulations or permitted by the French Financial  
Markets Authority. In case of transactions for purposes other than  
those mentioned above, the Company will inform its shareholders  
in a press release.  
The purchase, sale or transfer of these shares can be completed  
by any means on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities or  
over the counter, including through the purchase or sale of blocks  
of shares, under the conditions authorized by the relevant market  
authorities. These means include the use of any financial derivative  
instrument traded on regulated markets, multilateral trading facilities  
or over the counter and the implementation of option strategies.  
Based on these purposes, the shares of the Company acquired  
through this program may be:  
These transactions may be carried out at any time, except during  
public offerings for the Company’s shares, in accordance with  
applicable rules and regulations.  
– canceled up to the maximum legal limit of 10% of the total  
number of shares outstanding on the date of the operation,  
over a 24-month period;  
The maximum purchase price is set at 70 per share.  
208  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Share buybacks  
8
granted free of charge to the Group’s employees and to  
management of the Company or Group companies;  
3
.3.3. Conditions  
Maximum share capital to be purchased and maximum funds  
allocated to the transaction  
delivered to recipients of the Company’s share purchase options  
having exercised such options;  
The maximum number of shares that may be purchased under  
the authorization proposed to the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16,  
2014 may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares outstanding,  
with this limit applying to an amount of the Company’s share capital  
that will be adjusted, if necessary, to include transactions affecting  
the share capital subsequent to this Meeting; purchases made by  
the Company may under no circumstances result in the Company  
holding more than 10% of the share capital, either directly or  
indirectly through subsidiaries.  
sold to employees, either directly or through Company savings plans;  
delivered to the holders of securities that grant such rights to  
receive such shares, either through redemption, conversion,  
exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner; or  
used in any other manner that is consistent with the purposes  
stated in this resolution.  
While they are held by the Company, such shares will be deprived  
of voting rights and dividend rights.  
Before any share cancellation under the authorization given by the  
Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012, based on the number of  
shares outstanding as of December 31, 2013 (2,377,678,160 shares),  
and given the 109,214,273 shares held by the Group as of  
February 28, 2014, i.e., 4.59% of the share capital, the maximum  
number of shares that may be purchased would be 128,553,543,  
representing a theoretical maximum investment of 8,998,748,010  
based on the maximum purchase price of 70.  
This authorization is granted for an 18-month period from the date  
of this Meeting. It renders ineffective, up to the unused portion,  
the fourth resolution of the combined Shareholders’ Meeting held  
on May 17, 2013.  
The Board of Directors is hereby granted full powers, with the right  
to delegate such authority, to undertake all actions necessary or  
desirable to carry out the program or programs authorized by this  
resolution.  
Conditions for buybacks  
The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 11, 2012 also authorized the  
Board of Directors to reduce the capital by canceling shares up to  
a maximum of 10% of the share capital over a 24-month period.  
This authorization was granted for five years and will expire after the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements for  
the year ending December 31, 2016. This approval was drafted as  
follows: “Upon presentation of the report of the Board of Directors and  
the auditors’ special report, the Shareholders’ Meeting, voting under  
conditions for quorum and majority required for extraordinary general  
meetings, hereby authorizes the Board of Directors, in accordance  
with Article L. 225-209 et seq. of the French Commercial Code and  
Article L. 225-213 of the same Code, to reduce the share capital on  
one or more occasions by canceling shares within the legal limits.  
Such shares may be bought back by any means on regulated  
markets, multilateral trading facilities or over the counter, including  
through the purchase or sale of blocks of shares, under the conditions  
authorized by the relevant market authorities. These means include  
the use of any financial derivative instrument traded on a regulated  
market or over the counter and the implementation of option  
strategies, with the Company taking measures, however, to avoid  
increasing the volatility of its stock. The portion of the program carried  
out through the purchase of blocks of shares will not be subject  
to quota allocation, up to the limit set by this resolution. These shares  
may be bought back at any time in accordance with current regulations,  
except during public offerings for the Company’s shares.  
Duration and schedule of the share buyback program  
The maximum number of shares that may be canceled under this  
authorization may not exceed 10% of the total number of shares  
outstanding, over a 24-month period, with this limit applying to a  
number of shares that will be adjusted, if necessary, to include  
transactions affecting the share capital subsequent to this Meeting.  
In accordance with the fourth resolution, which will be subject to  
approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014, the share  
buyback program may be implemented over an 18-month period  
following the date of this Meeting, and therefore expires on  
November 16, 2015.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting hereby grants full powers to the Board  
of Directors, with the option to sub-delegate such powers under  
the conditions provided by law, to carry out such capital reductions  
based on its decisions alone, to decide on the number of shares  
to cancel within the limit of 10% of the total number of shares  
outstanding as of the transaction date, over a 24-month period,  
to decide on the conditions of the capital reduction operations and  
confirm their execution, to apply, where applicable, the difference  
between the buyback value of the shares and their par value  
to any reserves or premiums, to amend the by-laws accordingly,  
and to complete all necessary formalities related thereto.  
Transactions carried out under the previous program  
Transactions carried out under the previous program are listed in  
the special report of the Board of Directors on share buybacks  
(see point 3.2. of this Chapter).  
This authorization is granted for five years and will expire after the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements for  
the year ending December 31, 2016.”  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
209  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Shareholders  
4. Shareholders  
4.1. Relationship between TOTAL and the French State  
Since the repeal on October 3, 2002 of the decree of December 13, 1993 establishing a golden share of Elf Aquitaine held by the French  
government, there are no longer any agreements or regulatory provisions governing shareholding relationships between TOTAL (or its subsidiary  
Elf Aquitaine) and the French government.  
4.2. Merger of TOTAL with PetroFina  
In December 1998, TOTAL signed an in-kind contribution  
agreement with Electrafina, Investor, Tractebel, Electrabel and AG  
In 2000, TotalFinaElf launched an additional public exchange offer  
for PetroFina shares, increasing its interest in PetroFina to 99.6%.  
In 2001, TotalFinaElf contributed its entire equity stake in PetroFina  
to Total Chimie (a wholly-owned subsidiary of TOTAL S.A.), which  
then launched a squeeze-out for the PetroFina shares not yet held.  
Total Chimie currently holds all PetroFina shares.  
1824 (the Contributors), under which the Contributors contributed  
their PetroFina shares to TOTAL. TOTAL then launched a public  
exchange offer in 1999 for the remaining PetroFina shares not yet  
in its possession. Following this public offering, TOTAL held 98.8%  
of PetroFina’s share capital.  
4.3. Merger of TotalFina with Elf Aquitaine  
In 1999, the Boards of Directors of TotalFina and Elf Aquitaine  
recommended to their shareholders that the two companies merge  
through a public exchange offer. Following the offer, TotalFina  
acquired the 254,345,078 shares of Elf Aquitaine in exchange for  
acquired 10,828,326 shares of Elf Aquitaine in exchange for  
14,437,768 new TotalFinaElf shares.  
As a result of the public buyout offer followed by a squeeze-out  
announced on March 24, 2010, TOTAL S.A. (formerly TotalFinaElf)  
now holds 100% of the shares issued by Elf Aquitaine.  
371,735,114 new TotalFina shares. In 2000, the Board of Directors  
launched a public buyback offer for all the Elf Aquitaine shares not  
yet held by the Company. Upon completion of this offer, TotalFinaElf  
210  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Shareholders  
8
4.4. Major shareholders  
4.4.1. Changes in major shareholders’ holdings  
For the purpose of this paragraph, major shareholders are defined as shareholders whose interest (in the share capital or voting rights)  
exceeds 5%.  
TOTAL’s major shareholders as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:  
2013  
2012  
2011  
As of December 31  
% of share  
capital  
% of voting  
rights  
% of  
theoretical  
% of share  
capital  
% of voting  
rights  
% of share  
capital  
% of voting  
rights  
voting rights(  
a)  
GBL-CNP in concert  
Of which Groupe Bruxelles Lambert(b)  
Of which Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille(b)  
4.8  
3.6  
1.2  
4.8  
3.6  
1.2  
4.4  
3.3  
1.1  
5.4  
4.0  
1.4  
5.4  
4.0  
1.4  
5.5  
4.0  
1.5  
5.6  
4.0  
1.6  
Group Employees(c)  
4.7  
8.6  
7.9  
4.4  
8.1  
4.4  
8.0  
Treasury shares  
Of which TOTAL S.A.  
Of which Total Nucléaire  
Of which subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine(d)  
4.6  
0.4  
0.1  
4.1  
-
-
-
-
8.1  
0.3  
0.2  
7.6  
4.6  
0.3  
0.1  
4.2  
-
-
-
-
4.6  
0.4  
0.1  
4.2  
-
-
-
-
Other shareholders(e)  
Of which holders of ADS(f)  
85.9  
9.3  
86.6  
9.2  
79.6  
8.5  
85.7  
9.3  
86.6  
9.3  
85.3  
8.7  
86.3  
8.7  
(a) Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares to which voting rights are attached,  
including treasury shares that are deprived of voting rights.  
(
b) Groupe Bruxelles Lambert is a company controlled jointly by the Desmarais family and Frère-Bourgeois S.A., and for the latter mainly through its direct and indirect interest in Compagnie  
Nationale à Portefeuille. In addition, Groupe Bruxelles Lambert and Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille have declared that they act in concert. Moreover, these companies have executive  
directors who serve on the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.  
(
c) Based on the definition of employee shareholding pursuant to Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code. The Amundi Group, the holding company for Amundi Asset Management,  
which is the manager of the employee collective investment fund “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT FRANCE” (see below), filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 11, 2014, declaring  
beneficial ownership of 184,350,308 Company shares as of December 31, 2013 (i.e., 7.8% of the Company’s share capital). The Amundi Group specified that it did not have sole voting  
or dispositive power over any of these shares, and that it had shared voting power over 73,373,788 of these shares (i.e., 3.1% of the Company’s share capital) and shared dispositive  
power over all of these shares. Moreover, the employee representatives serve on the Board of Directors of TOTAL S.A.  
(
(
(
d) Fingestval, Financière Valorgest and Sogapar.  
e) Of which 1.53% held by registered shareholders (non-Group) in 2013.  
f) American Depositary Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  
As of December 31, 2013, the holdings of the major shareholders  
were calculated based on 2,377,678,160 shares, representing  
4.4.3. Temporary transfer of securities  
Pursuant to legal obligations, any legal entity or individual (with the  
exception of those described in paragraph IV-3 of Article L. 233-7  
of the French Commercial Code) holding alone or in concert a  
number of shares representing more than 0.5% of the Company’s  
voting rights pursuant to one or more temporary transfers or similar  
operations as described in Article L. 225-126 of the aforementioned  
code is required to notify the Company and the French Financial  
Markets Authority of the number of shares temporarily owned  
no later than the third business day preceding the Shareholders’  
Meeting at midnight.  
2
,391,533,246 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings,  
or 2,601,078,962 theoretical voting rights(1) including:  
8,883,180 voting rights attached to the 8,883,180 TOTAL shares  
held by TOTAL S.A. that are deprived of voting rights; and  
200,662,536 voting rights attached to the 100,331,268 TOTAL  
shares held by TOTAL S.A. subsidiaries that cannot be exercised  
at Shareholders’ Meetings.  
For prior years, the holdings of the major shareholders were  
calculated on the basis of 2,365,933,146 shares to which  
Notifications must be e-mailed to the Company at:  
holding.df-shareholdingnoti[email protected]  
2,371,131,871 voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’ Meetings  
were attached as of December 31, 2012, and 2,363,767,313  
shares to which 2,368,716,634 voting rights exercisable at  
Shareholders’ Meetings were attached as of December 31, 2011.  
If no notification is sent, any shares acquired under any  
of the above temporary transfer operations will be deprived  
of voting rights at the relevant Shareholders’ Meeting and  
at any Shareholders’ Meeting that may be held until such  
shares are transferred again or returned.  
4
.4.2. Identification of the holders  
of bearer shares  
In accordance with Article 9 of its by laws, the Company is  
authorized, to the extent permitted under applicable law, to identify  
the holders of securities that grant immediate or future voting rights  
at the Company’s Shareholders’ Meetings.  
4
.4.4. Threshold notifications  
In addition to the legal obligation to inform the Company and the  
French Financial Markets Authority within four trading days of the  
(
1) Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares, including those shares held by the Group  
that are deprived of voting rights.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
211  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Shareholders  
date on which the number of shares (or securities similar to shares  
or voting rights pursuant to Article L. 233-9 of the French Commercial  
Code) held represents more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%,  
one-third, 50%, two-thirds, 90% or 95% of the share capital or  
theoretical voting rights(1) (Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial  
Code), any individual or legal entity who directly or indirectly comes  
to hold a percentage of the share capital, voting rights or rights  
giving future access to the Company’s share capital which is equal  
to or greater than 1%, or a multiple of this percentage, is required  
to notify the Company, within fifteen days of the date on which  
each of the above thresholds is exceeded, by registered mail with  
return receipt requested, and indicate the number of shares held.  
capital of 2,377,196,179 shares representing 2,606,134,412  
voting rights). CNP and GBL acting in concert had exceeded  
the 5% threshold on August 25, 2009 (AMF notice No. 209C1156).  
4.4.6. Holdings above the legal thresholds  
In accordance with Article L. 233-13 of the French Commercial  
Code, to TOTAL’s knowledge no shareholder held 5% or more  
of TOTAL’s share capital at year-end 2013.  
As of December 31, 2012, CNP and GBL acting in concert held  
5.36% of the share capital representing 5.37% of the voting rights.  
In AMF notice No. 213C1748 dated November 18, 2013, CNP  
and GBL acting in concert stated that they had fallen below, as of  
November 7, 2013, the 5% share capital and voting rights thresholds  
and that they held 118,764,036 TOTAL shares representing  
119,511,734 voting rights, i.e., 4.99% of the share capital and  
4.59% of the theoretical voting rights(1) (based on share capital of  
2,377,196,179 shares representing 2,606,134,412 voting rights).  
CNP and GBL acting in concert held more than 5% of  
If notification is not given, the shares held in excess of the threshold  
for which notification should have been given are deprived of voting  
rights at Shareholders’ Meetings if, at a Meeting, the failure to give  
notification is acknowledged and if one or more shareholders holding  
collectively at least 3% of the Company’s share capital or voting  
rights so request at that Meeting.  
Any individual or legal entity is also required to notify the Company  
in due form and within the time limits stated above when their direct  
or indirect holdings fall below each of the aforementioned thresholds.  
the Group’s share capital from August 25, 2009 (AMF notice  
No. 209C1156 dated September 2, 2009).  
To TOTAL’s knowledge, one known shareholder held 5% or more  
of the voting rights exercisable at TOTAL Shareholders’ Meetings at  
year-end 2013: as of December 31, 2013, the “TOTAL ACTIONNARIAT  
FRANCE” collective investment fund held 3.45% of the share capital  
representing 6.41% of the voting rights exercisable at Shareholders’  
Notifications must be sent to the Vice President of Investor  
Relations in Paris (contact details in point 6.8. of this Chapter).  
4.4.5. Legal threshold notifications in 2013  
Meetings and 5.89% of the theoretical voting rights(1)  
.
In AMF notice No. 213C1748 dated November 18, 2013, CNP  
and GBL acting in concert stated that they had fallen below,  
as of November 7, 2013, the 5% share capital and voting rights  
thresholds and that they held 118,764,036 TOTAL shares  
representing 119,511,734 voting rights, i.e., 4.99% of the share  
capital and 4.59% of the theoretical voting rights(1) (based on share  
4.4.7. Shareholders’ agreements  
TOTAL is not aware of any agreements among its shareholders.  
4.5. Treasury shares  
As of December 31, 2013, the Company held 109,214,448  
TOTAL shares either directly or through its indirect subsidiaries,  
which represented 4.59% of the share capital on that date.  
By law, these shares are deprived of voting rights.  
4.5.2. TOTAL shares held by Group  
companies  
As of December 31, 2013, Total Nucléaire, a Group company  
wholly-owned indirectly by TOTAL, held 2,023,672 TOTAL shares.  
As of December 31, 2013, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and  
Fingestval, indirect subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine, held 22,203,704,  
Refer to Chapter 9, point 1.5. of this Registration Document  
for more information.  
4,104,000 and 71,999,892 TOTAL shares, respectively, representing  
a total of 98,307,596 shares. As of December 31, 2013, the Company  
held 4.22% of the share capital through its indirect subsidiaries.  
4
.5.1. TOTAL shares held directly  
by the Company (treasury shares)  
The Company held 8,883,180 treasury shares as of December 31,  
2013, representing 0.37% of the share capital on that date.  
(
1) Pursuant to Article 223-11 of the AMF General Regulation, the number of theoretical voting rights is calculated on the basis of all outstanding shares to which voting rights are attached, including  
treasury shares that are deprived of voting rights.  
212  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Shareholders  
8
4.6. Shares held by members of the administrative and management bodies  
This information appears in points 1. and 5. of Chapter 5.  
4.7. Employee shareholding  
This information appears in point 5. of Chapter 5.  
4.8. Shareholding structure  
Estimates as of December 31, 2013, excluding treasury shares, based on the survey of identifiable holders of bearer shares (TPI) conducted  
on that date.  
4.8.1. By shareholder type  
4.8.2. By region  
(
a)  
France 28.3%  
Group employees 4.9%  
United Kingdom 10.7%  
Rest of Europe 20.7%  
North America 30.9%  
Individual shareholders 8.1%  
Institutional shareholders 87.0%  
of which  
1
1
2
3
9
7% in France  
1% in the United Kingdom  
0% in the Rest of Europe  
0% in North America  
% in Rest of World  
Rest of World 9.4%  
(a) Based on the definition of employee shareholding pursuant  
to Article L. 225-102 of the French Commercial Code.  
(4.7% of share capital - see point 4.4. of Chapter 8).  
The number of French individual TOTAL shareholders is estimated at 500,000.  
4.9. Regulated agreements and undertakings and related party transactions  
4
.9.1. Regulated agreements  
4.9.2. Related party transactions  
and undertakings  
Details of transactions with related parties as specified by the  
regulations adopted under EC regulation 1606/2002, entered into  
by the Group companies during fiscal years 2011, 2012 or 2013,  
appear in Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
(see point 7. of Chapter 10).  
The special report of the statutory auditors of TOTAL S.A.  
on regulated agreements and undertakings referred to in Article  
L. 225-38 et seq. of the French Commercial Code for fiscal  
year 2013 appears in point 1. of Chapter 12.  
These transactions primarily concern equity affiliates and  
non-consolidated companies in which TOTAL exercises  
significant influence.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
213  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Information for foreign shareholders  
5. Information for foreign shareholders  
5.1. American holders of ADRs  
Information for holders of TOTAL American Depositary Shares (ADS), represented by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), is provided on  
Form 20-F filed by TOTAL S.A. with the SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.  
5.2. Non-resident shareholders (other than American shareholders)  
In addition to Euronext Paris, TOTAL shares have been listed on the  
London Stock Exchange since 1973 and on the Brussels Stock  
Exchange since 1999.  
French administrative policy sets out the conditions under which  
the reduced 15% French withholding tax rate is applicable. Holders  
who are residents of one of the countries with which France has  
entered into a tax treaty providing for a reduced withholding tax  
rate may be eligible for immediate application of the reduced 15%  
withholding tax rate by electing the simplified procedure.  
Dividends  
Dividends distributed by TOTAL to shareholders not residing in France  
are generally subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 30%.  
Under the simplified procedure, a non-resident shareholder may  
request a reduction in the withholding tax rate by presenting  
a certificate of residence which is consistent with the example  
available from the French tax office for non-residents at the  
following address: impots.gouv.fr (heading Search forms/Form  
no. 5000) and certified by the tax authorities of the country of  
residence. The shareholder must then send this certificate of  
residence as early as possible, and in all cases prior to payment  
of the dividends, to the institution that manages his or her accounts,  
whether in or outside France.  
This rate is increased to 75% for income paid outside France in  
a non-cooperative country or territory (“NCCT”), as defined by the  
French General Tax Code (Article 238-0 A). A list of these NCCT is  
drawn up and updated annually by an order of the French authorities.  
This withholding tax is reduced to 21% for dividends received  
by individuals residing in a Member State of the European Union  
or in Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein.  
Dividends paid to non-profit organizations headquartered in a  
Member State of the European Union or in Iceland, Norway or  
Liechtenstein are generally subject to withholding tax at a rate of 15%,  
subject to compliance with certain conditions stipulated in the  
administrative policy (BOI-INT-DG-20-20-20-20-20120912 no. 290).  
If the shareholder’s accounts are managed outside France, the  
account manager outside France must inform the payer institution  
in France, as soon as it receives the certificate of residence and  
prior to payment of the dividends, of the total amount of the  
dividends to which the shareholder is entitled and for which the  
payer institution may apply the reduced withholding tax rate  
stipulated in the treaty.  
However, withholding tax is not applicable to income distributed by  
French companies to foreign collective investment funds formed  
under foreign law and located in a Member State of the European  
Union or in another State that has entered into an administrative  
assistance agreement with France for the purpose of combating  
fraud and tax evasion.  
However, the payer institution in France may waive the requirement  
to present the certificate of residence provided for in the treaty  
if the shareholder’s identity and tax residence are known to it.  
In this case, the payer institution personally assumes responsibility  
for the immediate application of the reduced 15% withholding  
tax rate provided for in the treaty.  
To this end, these funds must fulfill two conditions:  
raise capital among a number of investors with a view  
to investing it, based on a defined investment policy;  
However, this simplified procedure does not apply to dividends paid  
to residents of Singapore given the specific procedures stipulated  
by agreement between France and this country.  
have characteristics similar to those of collective investment  
funds formed under French law (open-end mutual fund  
(
OPCVM), open-end property fund (OPCI) and closed-end  
If the non-resident holder is unable to present a certificate of  
residence from the tax authorities of his or her country of residence  
prior to the dividend payment date, or if the simplified procedure  
cannot be applied to the holder, the French payer institution will pay  
the dividends after deducting the ordinary withholding tax at a rate  
of 30%. However, the holder may request the 15% rate provided  
for in the treaty by being reimbursed for the amount overpaid  
(30% -15%). This reimbursement may be requested from the tax  
authorities by the shareholder, or by the payer institution if it has  
agreed to do so with the shareholder, by sending a specific form  
investment fund (SICAF)).  
Under numerous bilateral international Tax Treaties signed between  
France and other countries for the purpose of avoiding double  
taxation (“Tax Treaties”), the withholding tax rate is reduced in cases  
where dividends are paid to a shareholder residing in one of the  
countries that signed such Tax Treaties, provided that certain  
conditions are met (“holder”).  
The countries with which France has signed a tax treaty providing  
for a reduced withholding tax rate of 15% on French dividends are:  
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,  
Norway, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain,  
Switzerland and the United Kingdom.  
(forms 5000 and 5001 or any other appropriate form issued by  
the French tax authorities) prior to December 31 of the second  
year following the date on which the withholding tax was paid  
to the French Treasury. Generally speaking, any reimbursement  
214  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Information for foreign shareholders  
8
of withholding tax should be paid within 12 months of the date  
on which the aforementioned form is filed. However, it may not  
be paid before January 15 of the year following the year in which  
the dividends were paid. Copies of the French forms referred to  
above are available from the French tax office for non-residents,  
at the following address: impots.gouv.fr (heading “Search forms”).  
When the shares are in registered form, the company issuing them  
performs the function of account keeper-custodian and is therefore  
liable for the payment of the tax for purchases not involving an ISP.  
In principle, sales of shares of French companies are also subject to  
a French tax called “droit d’enregistrement” (transfer duty). However,  
French lawmakers have stipulated that transfer duties are not applicable  
to transactions that are subject to the financial transaction tax.  
Taxation of dividends outside France varies according to each  
country’s respective tax legislation.  
The above explanation is a general overview and shareholders  
are advised to consult their own tax advisor to determine the effect  
of Tax Treaties and applicable procedures as well as their income  
tax and, more generally, the tax consequences applicable to their  
particular situation.  
In most countries, the gross amount of dividends is generally  
included in the shareholder’s taxable income. Based on certain  
conditions and limitations, the French withholding tax on dividends  
may result in a tax credit being applied to the foreign tax payable  
by the shareholder.  
However, there are some exceptions. For example, in Belgium  
a 25% withholding tax applies to net dividends received by an  
individual shareholder.  
Furthermore, the amending finance law of August 16, 2012 created a  
3
2
% tax applicable to dividend distributions made on or after August 17,  
012. This tax, called “Additional corporation tax contribution”,  
applies to distributed income and is payable by the Company  
that distributes the dividends.  
Taxation on sales of shares  
Capital gains on sales of shares realized by taxpayers residing  
outside France are, in principle, exempt from income tax in France.  
However, there are two exceptions to this rule: one for sales of  
holdings where the seller owns a permanent establishment or a fixed  
place of business in France to which his or her shares are attached,  
and the other for sales carried out by individuals or organizations  
residing or established in a non-cooperative country or territory.  
However, the shareholder may be taxed on the capital gain or loss  
on the sale of shares in his or her country of tax residence.  
Through the law of March 14, 2012, French lawmakers instituted  
a financial transaction tax that applies to all purchases of shares  
of companies listed on a French, European or foreign regulated  
market. This purchase must result in a transfer of ownership and  
the securities must be issued by a French company whose market  
capitalization exceeds 1 billion as of December 1 of the year  
preceding the year of taxation.  
The tax also applies to securities representing shares of stock  
issued by a company, regardless of the place of establishment  
of its head office. This includes transactions carried out on  
certificates representing shares, such as American Depositary  
Receipts and European depositary receipts.  
This financial transaction tax is equal to 0.2% of the share  
purchase price.  
The party subject to the tax is the investment services provider (ISP),  
regardless of its place of establishment, when it executes buy orders  
for third parties or buys on its own account.  
In France, ISPs are investment companies and credit institutions  
that have been approved to provide all or some investment services.  
Operators that provide equivalent services outside France are  
subject to the tax under the same conditions.  
For purchases not involving an ISP, the tax is payable by the  
establishment acting as account administrator, regardless of its  
place of establishment.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
215  
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Investor Relations  
6. Investor Relations  
6.1. Communication policy  
In addition to the French version of its Registration Document filed  
each year with the French Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des  
marchés financiers), the Group regularly provides information on its  
operations through reports and newsletters, on its website total.com  
and through press releases for significant news. The Group’s  
presentations of its results and outlook are also available on its  
website. This English version of the Document de référence  
The Company also files an annual report on Form 20-F, in English,  
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)  
(see point 4 in Chapter 9).  
The Group holds regular information sessions and participates in  
conferences, for shareholders, investors and financial analysts,  
both in France and abroad.  
(Registration Document) is provided for information purposes only.  
6.2. Relationships with institutional investors and financial analysts  
Members of the Group’s General Management regularly meet with  
portfolio managers and financial analysts in the leading financial  
centers throughout the world (Europe, North America, Asia and the  
Middle East).  
these regions and discover its investment strategy. The analysts  
and investors also benefited from the opportunity to enter into  
discussions with Group’s executives, local teams and a number  
of political of representatives from these countries.  
The first series of meetings is held annually in the first quarter, after  
publication of the results for the previous year. A second series of  
meetings is held during the third quarter following the presentation  
of the Group’s outlook. Material used during meetings is available  
on the Group’s website (total.com, heading Investors/Institutional  
Investors/Presentations).  
The Group maintains an active dialogue with shareholders in  
the field of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). With a team  
dedicated to CSR, the Investor Relations Department pursues  
an ongoing dialogue with investors and non-financial analysts  
on a range of issues (health and safety, ethics and human rights,  
governance, environment, climate change and future energies,  
contribution to the development of local communities, dialogue  
with the various parties involved etc.). Meetings specifically  
devoted to these issues are organized in France and worldwide.  
Thus, seventy one-on-one meetings were held in 2013.  
As in previous years, three conference calls were led by the Group’s  
Chief Financial Officer to discuss results for the first, second and  
third quarters of the year. These conferences are available on the  
Group’s website (total.com, heading Institutional Investors/Results).  
A significant portion of the presentation of the Group’s outlook  
made to the financial community in London on September 23, 2013  
was devoted to the CSR: Mr. Christophe de Margerie (Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer) and Ms. Manoelle Lepoutre  
(Sustainable Development and Environment Director) reminded  
attendees of the Group’s strategy in this field topics such as ethics,  
security and acceptability were addressed during workshops.  
In 2013, the Group held some 600 meetings with institutional  
investors and financial analysts.  
In addition, from 12th to 15th November 2013, more than twenty  
analysts and investors took part in a field trip to Saudi Arabia and  
the Republic of Congo. This trip provided an opportunity to present  
the Refining strategy during a visit to SATORP in Jubail, which is the  
Group’s largest refining-petrochemicals platform, and to discover two  
Congolese offshore sites operated by the Group: Nkossa and Alima.  
These visits to the Group’s installations in these countries enabled  
those present to gain an insight into TOTAL’s strong positions in  
A Chapter of the Registration Document is dedicated to social and  
environmental information (see Chapter 7). TOTAL also publishes a  
CSR report every year at the time of the Shareholders’ Meeting.  
6.3. A quality relationship serving individual shareholders  
TOTAL’s Individual Shareholder Relations Department is the only  
shareholder service in France which has received ISO 9001 version  
As part of this quality assurance certification, satisfaction surveys  
are made available on the Group’s website (total.com, heading  
Investors/Individual Shareholders/Individual Shareholder Relations).  
2008 certification for its communication policy with individual  
shareholders. This certification was renewed for a further three-year  
period in 2013 by AFNOR following a thorough audit of the various  
processes implemented in terms of communication with individual  
shareholders.  
The quality of TOTAL’s investor relations was also acknowledged by  
trade journals in the form of the 2013 Investor Awards for long-term  
performance conferred by Boursorama and Morningstar, and the  
Agefi Gouvernance d’argent award for shareholder democracy,  
transparency of information and quality of communications.  
This certification of TOTAL’s Individual Shareholder Relations  
Department reflects the Group’s commitment to providing individual  
shareholders with valuable financial information over the long term.  
216  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Investor Relations  
8
In 2013, TOTAL also continued to organize meetings and information  
sessions with individual shareholders, in particular as part of various  
events:  
A quarter of the members of the e-Consultative Shareholders  
Committee (e-CCA) were renewed. Since 2012, to facilitate  
exchange and promote efficient, regular interaction, the members  
of the e-CCA and the team of the Individual Shareholder Relations  
Department discuss various topics via an online dialogue forum  
The Shareholders’ Meeting held on 17 May 2013 at the Palais  
des Congrès in Paris was attended by more than 3,700 people.  
This meeting was broadcast live and was later available on the  
Group’s website. Notice of the meeting is sent directly to all  
holders of 250 or more bearer shares and to all registered  
shareholders. All French shareholders owning one or more  
shares were able to vote via Internet using the Votaccess  
platform irrespective of the form of their shareholding.  
(Group news, improvement in communication materials, feedback  
on events organized by the Group, etc.).  
The e-CCA met three times in 2013:  
in April, during a meeting with Mr. Christophe de Margerie,  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;  
in May, following the Shareholders’ Meeting;  
At the Actionaria trade show, which was held at the Palais des  
Congrès in Paris in November 2013, TOTAL welcomed nearly  
– in September, during a visit to CSTJF in Pau (France).  
3
,500 visitors to its stand which showcased the SATORP refinery  
During these meetings, the e-CCA expresses its opinion on various  
aspects of the individual shareholder communication policy,  
including the Shareholders’ Newsletter, the presentation media  
used for meetings, the webzine and the “Total Investors” mobile  
app for smartphones and digital tablets.  
in Jubail. The trade show gave shareholders an opportunity to  
meet the Group’s representatives present at the stand and  
attend conferences relating to Refining strategy.  
On November 15, Mr. Christophe de Margerie, Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer, addressed more than 15,000  
shareholders during an on-line interview on Boursorama.  
In 2013, the e-CCA was particularly active in helping to set up the  
Votaccess voting platform for the Shareholders’ Meeting.  
Eight other meetings with individual shareholders were held in  
The Shareholders’ Circle organized 25 events in 2013, to which  
more than 2,000 individual shareholders members of the Circle  
were invited. Shareholders visited industrial facilities and cultural  
and natural sites supported by the TOTAL Foundation and attended  
conferences dedicated to better understanding the Group’s  
businesses. They also attended cultural events within the  
framework of the TOTAL Foundation sponsorship policy.  
2013: in Gand in Belgium, Copenhagen in Denmark, as well as in  
Marseille, Toulouse, Avignon, Biarritz, Rennes and Lille in France.  
Other meetings were also held with professionals, in particular  
during the Journées Notariales du Patrimoine asset management  
seminar held in Dauphine (Paris). These meetings were attended  
by nearly 3,600 people. The next meetings, which are scheduled  
for 2014, are expected to be held in Dijon, Toulouse, Lyon, Nice,  
Paris and Nantes in France, as well as in Anvers, Copenhagen  
and Geneva in the rest of Europe.  
Consequently, TOTAL met nearly 14,000 individual shareholders  
during 2013.  
6.4. Registered shareholding  
TOTAL shares, which are generally bearer instruments, can be  
registered shares. In this case, shareholders are identified by  
TOTAL S.A., in its capacity as the issuer, or by its agent, BNP Paribas  
Securities Services, which is responsible for keeping the register  
of shareholders’ registered shares.  
6.4.2. Main advantages of registered shares  
The advantages of registered shares include:  
– double voting rights if the shares are held continuously for two  
successive years (see point 2.4.1. of Chapter 9);  
a toll-free number for all contacts with BNP Paribas Securities  
Services (a toll-free call within France from a landline):  
6
.4.1. Registration  
0
800 117 000 or +33 1 40 14 80 61 (from outside France); from  
There are two forms of registration:  
Monday to Friday (business days), 8: 45 a.m. – 6: 00 pm,  
GMT+1 (fax: +33 1 55 77 34 17);  
administered registered shares: shares are registered with  
TOTAL through BNP Paribas Securities Services, but the holder’s  
financial intermediary continues to administer them with regard to  
sales, purchases, coupons, etc.;  
the ability to receive all information published by the Group for its  
shareholders;  
the ability to join the TOTAL Shareholders’ Circle by holding at  
least 50 shares.  
pure registered shares: TOTAL holds and directly administers  
shares on behalf of the holder through BNP Paribas Securities  
Services, which administers sales, purchases, coupons,  
shareholders’ meeting notices, etc., so that the shareholder does  
not need to appoint a financial intermediary. This form of registration  
is not easily compatible with the registration of shares in a French  
share savings plan (PEA), given the administrative procedures  
that apply in such cases.  
The advantages of pure registered shares, in addition to those of  
administered registered shares, include:  
no custodial fees;  
– easier placement of market orders(1) (phone, mail, fax, Internet);  
(1) Provided the subscriber has signed the market service agreement. Signing this agreement is free of charge.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
217  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
8
Investor Relations  
brokerage fees equal to 0.20% of the gross amount of the trade,  
with no minimum charge and trades of up to 1,000 each;  
receives the shares on a registered account, a certificate of account  
registration is sent to the shareholder, who is asked to send the  
following to it:  
the ability to view shareholdings online.  
a bank account number (or a postal account or savings account  
number) for payment of dividends; and  
To convert TOTAL shares into pure registered shares, shareholders  
must fill out a form, which can be obtained upon request from the  
Individual Shareholder Relations Department, and send it to their  
financial intermediary. Once BNP Paribas Securities Services  
– a market service agreement to facilitate Trading TOTAL shares on  
the stock exchange.  
6.5. Individual Shareholders Department Contacts  
For information regarding the conversion of bearer shares to  
registered shares, membership in the Shareholders’ Circle or any  
other general information, individual shareholders may contact:  
Phone  
From France: 0 800 039 039  
(toll-free number from a landline in France)  
outside France: +33 1 47 44 24 02  
Monday to Friday from 9: 00 a.m. to 12: 30 p.m.  
and from 1: 30 p.m. to 5.30 p.m. (GMT+1)  
TOTAL S.A.  
Individual Shareholder Relations Department  
Tour Coupole  
Fax  
From France: 01 47 44 20 14  
2
, place Jean Millier  
Arche Nord Coupole/Regnault  
2078 Paris La Défense Cedex, France  
outside France: +33 1 47 44 20 14  
Email  
Contact  
Using the contact form provided on total.com,  
heading Investors  
9
Jean-Marie Rossini  
(Head of Individual Shareholder Relations Department)  
6.6. 2014 Schedule  
February 12  
Results for the fourth quarter and full year 2013  
and outlook – London  
September 17  
Shareholders Congress in Copenhagen  
(Denmark)  
March 24  
April 26  
April 30  
May 16  
Ex-dividend date for the 2013 third interim dividend  
Shareholders Congress in Anvers – Belgium  
Results of the first quarter 2014  
September 22  
September 23  
Investor Day – London  
Ex-dividend date for the 2014 first  
interim dividend(2)  
October 6  
Meeting with individual shareholders  
in Nantes (France)  
2014 Shareholders’ Meeting in Paris  
(Palais des Congrès)  
October 13  
Meeting with individual shareholders in Nice  
June 2  
June 2  
Ex-dividend date for the 2013 remainder dividend(1)  
(France)  
Meeting with individual shareholders in Toulouse  
October 29  
Results of the third quarter 2014  
(
France)  
Meeting with individual shareholders in Lyon  
France)  
Results of second quarter and first half 2014  
November 21-22  
Actionaria Trade Show and meeting of  
shareholders in Paris (Palais des Congrès)  
June 12  
July 30  
(
December 2  
Meeting with individual shareholders in Geneva  
(Switzerland)  
December 15  
Ex-dividend date for the 2014  
second interim dividend(2)  
(
1) Subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting of May 16, 2014.  
(2) Subject to approval by the Board of Directors.  
218  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL and its shareholders  
Investor Relations  
8
6.7. 2015 Schedule  
March 23 Ex-dividend date for the 2014 third interim dividend(1)  
May 29 Shareholders’ Meeting in Paris  
Palais des Congrès)  
June 8  
Ex-dividend date for the 2014  
remainder dividend(2)  
(
6.8. Investor Relations Department contacts  
Martin Deffontaines  
Vice President Investor Relations  
TOTAL S.A.  
Tour Coupole  
2
9
, place Jean Millier Arche Nord Coupole/Regnault  
2078 Paris La Défense Cedex  
France  
Phone: 01 47 44 58 53 or +33 1 47 44 58 53  
Fax: 01 47 44 58 24 or +33 1 47 44 58 24  
North America:  
Robert Hammond  
Director of Investor Relations North America  
TOTAL American Services Inc.  
1201 Louisiana Street, Suite 1800  
Houston, TX 77002  
United States  
Phone: +1 (713) 483-5070  
Fax: +1 (713) 483-5629  
(
1) Subject to approval by the Board of Directors.  
(2) Subject to approval by the Shareholders’ Meeting of 29 May 2015.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
219  
 
220  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
8.Renseignements généraux  
General information  
9
General information  
1.  
Share capital  
222  
1.1.  
1.2.  
1.3.  
1.4.  
1.5.  
1.6.  
Share capital as of December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222  
Features of the shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222  
Authorized share capital not issued as of December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .222  
Potential share capital as of December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .225  
TOTAL shares held by the Company or its subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .225  
Share capital history (since January 1, 2011) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .225  
2.  
Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
226  
2.1.  
2.2.  
2.3.  
2.4.  
2.5.  
2.6.  
2.7.  
2.8.  
General information concerning the Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .226  
Summary of the Company’s purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .226  
Provisions of the by laws governing the administration and management bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .227  
Rights, privileges and restrictions attached to the shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .228  
Amending shareholders’ rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229  
Shareholders’ Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229  
Thresholds to be declared according to the by laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229  
Changes in the share capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .229  
3.  
Historical financial information and other information  
230  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
3.4.  
2013, 2012 and 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .230  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .230  
Audit of the historical financial information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .230  
Other information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .230  
4
.
.
Documents on display  
Information on holdings  
231  
231  
5
5
5
.1.  
.2.  
General information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .231  
Significant changes in the Group’s interests in listed companies in 2011, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .231  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
221  
General information  
9
Share capital  
1. Share capital  
1.1. Share capital as of December 31, 2013  
5,944,195,400, consisting of 2,377,678,160 fully paid ordinary shares.  
1.2. Features of the shares  
There is only one class of shares, par value 2.50. A double voting right is granted to every shareholder, under certain conditions  
see point 2.4.1. of this Chapter). The shares are in bearer or registered form at the shareholder’s discretion. The shares are in book-entry  
form and registered in an account.  
(
1.3. Authorized share capital not issued as of December 31, 2013  
A table summarizing the currently valid delegations and  
authorizations to increase share capital that have been granted by  
the Shareholders’ Meeting to the Board of Directors, and the uses  
made of those delegations and authorizations in fiscal year 2013,  
appears in point 1.3.8. of this Chapter.  
850 million, i.e., 340 million shares, par value 2.50 (delegation of  
authority valid for twenty-six months). Furthermore, under the  
fifteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11,  
2012, the Board is authorized, for each of the issuances made in  
connection with the fourteenth resolution, to increase the number  
of securities to be issued within the limit of the ceiling of 15% of  
the initial issuance (at the same price as the price fixed for the initial  
issuance) within the limit of the ceiling fixed under the fourteenth  
resolution. The nominal amount of the capital increases is counted  
against the maximum aggregate nominal amount of 2.5 billion  
authorized by the thirteenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
held on May 11, 2012.  
1
.3.1. Thirteenth resolution of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012  
Delegation of authority granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the  
Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing common  
shares or other securities granting immediate or future rights to the  
Company’s share capital, maintaining shareholders’ pre-emptive  
subscription rights up to a maximum nominal amount of 2.5 billion,  
i.e., 1 billion shares (delegation of authority valid for twenty-six months).  
Furthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the debt securities  
granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued  
pursuant to the above mentioned thirteenth and fourteenth resolutions  
and the sixteenth resolution (mentioned below) may not exceed  
10 billion, or their exchange value, on the date of issuance.  
Furthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the debt securities  
granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued  
pursuant to the thirteenth resolution and the fourteenth and  
sixteenth resolutions (mentioned below) may not exceed  
1
.3.3. Sixteenth resolution of the  
10 billion, or their exchange value, on the date of issuance.  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012  
Delegation of power granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to  
the Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing  
new ordinary shares or other securities granting immediate  
or future rights to the Company’s share capital as compensation  
of in-kind contribution granted to the Company, by an amount not  
exceeding 10% of the share capital outstanding at the date of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2012 (delegation of authority  
valid for twenty-six months). The nominal amount of the capital  
increases is counted against the maximum aggregate nominal  
amount of 850 million authorized by the fourteenth resolution  
of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012.  
1
.3.2. Fourteenth resolution of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012  
Delegation of authority granted by the Shareholders’ Meeting to the  
Board of Directors to increase the share capital by issuing common  
shares or other securities granting immediate or future rights to the  
Company’s share capital, canceling shareholders’ pre-emptive  
subscription rights, including the compensation comprised of  
securities as part of a public exchange offer, provided that they  
meet the requirements of Article L. 225-148 of the French  
Commercial Code. This resolution grants the Board of Directors  
the authority to grant a priority period for shareholders to subscribe  
to these securities pursuant to the provisions of Article L. 225-135  
of the French Commercial Code. The total amount of the capital  
increases without pre-emptive subscription rights that may occur  
immediately or in the future cannot exceed the nominal amount of  
Furthermore, the maximum nominal amount of the debt securities  
granting rights to the Company’s share capital that may be issued  
pursuant to the above mentioned thirteenth, fourteenth and  
sixteenth resolutions may not exceed 10 billion, or their exchange  
value, on the date of issuance.  
222  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
General information  
Share capital  
9
1
.3.4. Twelfth resolution of the  
1.3.6. Eleventh resolution of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 17, 2013  
Delegation of authority to the Board of Directors to complete capital  
increases reserved for employees participating in a company savings  
plan (Plan d’épargne d’entreprise), up to a maximum of 1.5%  
of the outstanding share capital on the date of the decision of the  
Board of Directors to proceed with the issue (delegation of authority  
valid for twenty-six months), it being specified that the amount  
of the capital increase is counted against the maximum aggregate  
nominal amount of 2.5 billion authorized by the thirteenth  
resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting on May, 11, 2012.  
This delegation renders ineffective, up to the unused portion,  
the seventeenth resolution of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on  
May 11, 2012.  
Authority to grant Company stock options to TOTAL employees  
and to executive directors up to a maximum of 0.75% of the share  
capital outstanding on the date of the meeting of the Board  
of Directors that approves the stock option grant. In addition,  
the options granted to the Company’s executive directors cannot  
exceed 0.05% of the outstanding share capital on the date  
of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves the grants  
(authorization valid for thirty-eight months).  
Pursuant to this authorization, as of December 31, 2013,  
17,832,586 stock options, including 1,188,839 to the Company’s  
executive directors, could still be awarded.  
Given the use of the delegations stipulated in the seventeenth and  
eighteenth resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May  
1
.3.7. Nineteenth resolution of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 11, 2012  
11, 2012, which resulted in the issuance in 2013 of 10,802,215  
shares, and given that the Board of Directors did not make use  
of the delegations of authority granted by the thirteenth, fourteenth  
and sixteenth resolutions of the Shareholders’ Meeting held on May  
Authority to cancel shares up to a maximum of 10% of the share  
capital of the Company existing as of the date of the operation  
within a twenty-four-month period. This authorization is effective  
until the Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial  
statements for the year ending December 31, 2016. The Board did  
not make use of this delegation of authority during fiscal year 2012.  
11, 2012, the authorized capital not issued was 2.47 billion as of  
December 31, 2013, representing 989 million shares.  
1
.3.5. Eleventh resolution of the  
Based on 2,377,678,160 shares outstanding on December 31,  
2013, the Company may, up until the conclusion of the Shareholders’  
Meeting called to approve the financial statements for the fiscal  
year ending on December 31, 2016, cancel a maximum of  
Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 13, 2011  
Authority to grant restricted outstanding or new TOTAL shares  
to employees of the Group and to executive directors up to a  
maximum of 0.8% of the share capital outstanding on the date  
of the meeting of the Board of Directors that approves  
the restricted share grants. In addition, the shares granted  
to the Company’s executive directors cannot exceed 0.01%  
of the outstanding share capital on the date of the meeting of the  
Board of Directors that approves the grants (authorization valid  
for thirty-eight months).  
237,767,816 shares before reaching the cancellation threshold of  
0% of share capital canceled during a twenty-four-month period.  
1
Pursuant to this authorization:  
3,700,000 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board  
of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2011, including  
16,000 outstanding shares awarded to the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer;  
4,300,000 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board  
of Directors on July 26, 2012, including 53,000 outstanding  
shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;  
4,464,200 outstanding shares were awarded by the Board  
of Directors on July 25, 2013, including 53,000 outstanding  
shares awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
As of December 31, 2013, 6,557,225 shares, including 115,767  
to the Company’s executive directors could therefore  
still be awarded pursuant to this authorization.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
223  
General information  
9
Share capital  
1
.3.8. Table compiled in accordance with Article L. 225-100 of the French Commercial Code  
summarizing the use of delegations of authority and powers granted to the Board of Directors  
with respect to capital increases as of December 31, 2013  
Type  
Par value limit, or maximum number  
of shares expressed as % of share  
capital (par value, number of shares  
or % of share capital)  
Use in 2013,  
par value,  
or number  
of shares  
Available balance  
as of 12/31/2013  
par value, or  
Date  
Expiry  
of delegation  
of authority  
authorization  
or authorization granted to the  
by the Board of  
Directors  
date term of  
number of shares  
Extraordinary  
Shareholders’  
Meeting  
Debt  
10 billion  
in securities  
-
10 billion  
May 11, 2012 July 11, 2014  
th  
th  
securities  
representing  
rights  
(13 , 14 and 26 months  
th  
16 resolutions)  
to capital  
2.5 billion, i.e., a maximum of 1 billion 10.8 million  
2.47 billion  
(i.e., 989 million  
shares)  
May 11, 2012 July 11, 2014  
(13 resolution) 26 months  
shares(  
a)  
th  
shares issued with a pre-emptive  
subscription right, of which:  
1
/ a specific cap of 850 million,  
-
850 million  
May 11, 2012 July 11, 2014  
(14 resolution) 26 months  
th  
i.e., a maximum of 340 million shares  
for issuances without pre-emptive  
subscription rights (with potential  
use of a greenshoe), including the  
compensation comprised of securities  
as part of a public exchange offer,  
provided that they meet the requirements  
of Article L. 225-148 of the French  
Commercial Code, of which:  
Maximum  
cap for the  
issuance  
of securities  
granting  
immediate  
or future  
rights to  
share  
Nominal  
share  
capital  
1
/ a sub-cap of 10% of the share  
-
591.1 million  
May 11, 2012 July 11, 2014  
(16 resolution) 26 months  
capital  
th  
capital on the date of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting on  
May 11, 2012( through in-kind  
contributions when provisions  
of Article L. 225-148 of the French  
Commercial Code are not applicable  
b)  
2
/ a specific cap of 1.5% of the share -  
24.9 million  
shares  
May 17, 2013 July 17, 2015  
(12 resolution) 26 months  
(c)  
th  
capital on the date of Board  
decision for capital increases  
reserved for employees participating  
in Company Savings Plan  
Stock option grants  
0.75% of share capital(c) on  
the date of Board decision  
to grant options  
-
17.8 million  
shares  
May 17, 2013 July 17, 2016  
(11 resolution) 38 months  
th  
Restricted shares awarded  
to Group Employees and  
to executives directors  
0.8% of share capital(b) on the date 4.5 million  
of Board decision to grant the  
restricted shares  
6.6 million  
shares(  
May 13, 2011 July 13, 2014  
(11 resolution) 38 months  
d)  
th  
(
a) The number of new shares authorized under the 13th resolution of the ESM held on May 11, 2012 cannot exceed 1 billion shares. Pursuant to the 17th and 18th resolutions of the ESM  
held on May 11, 2012, on September 18, 2012 the Board of Directors decided to proceed with a capital increase reserved for TOTAL employees in 2013, which resulted in the creation  
of 10,802,215 shares counted against this cap. As a result, the available balance under this authorization was 989,197,785 new shares as at December 31, 2013.  
b) Share capital as of May 11, 2012: 2,364,546,966 shares.  
(
(
(
c) Share capital as of December 31, 2013: 2,377,678,160 shares.  
d) The number of shares that may be awarded as restricted share grants under the 11th resolution of the May 13, 2011 ESM may not exceed 0.8% of the share capital on the date when  
the restricted shares are awarded by the Board of Directors. As the Board of Directors awarded 3,700,000 outstanding shares on September 14, 2011, 4,300,000 outstanding shares  
on July 26, 2012 and 4,464,200 outstanding shares on July 25, 2013, the number of shares that could still be awarded as of December 31, 2013 was 6,557,225 shares. In addition,  
th  
the shares awarded under presence and performance conditions to the Company’s Corporate executive officers under the 11 resolution of the ESM held on May 13, 2011, cannot  
exceed 0.01% of the outstanding share capital on the date of the decision of the Board of Directors to proceed with the grant. Given the 16,000 outstanding shares awarded under  
presence and performance conditions to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer by the Board of Directors at its meeting on September 14, 2011, the 53,000 outstanding shares  
awarded under presence and performance conditions to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer by the Board of Directors at its meeting on July 26, 2012 and the 53,000 outstanding  
shares awarded under presence and performance conditions to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013, the number of outstanding shares  
that may still be awarded to the Company’s executive directors is 115,767.  
224  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
General information  
Share capital  
9
1.4. Potential share capital as of December 31, 2013  
Securities granting rights to TOTAL shares, through exercise or  
redemption, are TOTAL share subscription options amounting to  
– 1,141,094 options for the plan awarded by the Board  
of Directors on September 14, 2011.  
2
5,356,113 share subscription options as of December 31, 2013,  
In addition, the global free TOTAL share plan intended for all Group  
Employees awarded by the Board of Directors at its meeting on  
May 21, 2010 is likely to result in the issuance of a maximum of  
873,475 shares as of December 31, 2013.  
divided into:  
5,620,626 options for the plan awarded by the Board  
of Directors on July 18, 2006;  
5,847,965 options for the plan awarded by the Board  
of Directors on July 17, 2007;  
The potential share capital (existing share capital plus rights and  
securities that could result in the issuance of new TOTAL shares,  
through exercise or redemption), i.e., 2,403,907,748 shares,  
represents 101.10% of the share capital as of December 31, 2013,  
on the basis of 2,377,678,160 TOTAL shares constituting the share  
capital as of December 31, 2013, 25,356,113 TOTAL shares that  
could be issued upon the exercise of TOTAL options, and 873,475  
TOTAL shares that could be issued under a global free share plan.  
4,219,198 options for the plan awarded on October 9, 2008  
by decision of the Board of Directors on September 9, 2008;  
3,989,378 options for the plan awarded by the Board  
of Directors on September 15, 2009;  
4,537,852 options for the plan awarded by the Board  
of Directors on September 14, 2010; and  
1.5. TOTAL shares held by the Company or its subsidiaries  
As of December 31, 2013  
Percentage of share capital held by TOTAL S.A.  
0.37%  
Number of shares held in portfolio  
Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)  
Market value of portfolio (M)(a)  
8,883,180  
353  
396  
Percentage of capital held by companies(b) of the Group  
4.59%  
Number of shares held in portfolio  
Book value of portfolio (at purchase price) (M)  
Market value of portfolio (M)(a)  
109,214,448  
3,379  
4,863  
(
a) Based on a market price of 44.53 per share as of December 31, 2013.  
(b) TOTAL S.A., Total Nucléaire, Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval.  
1.6. Share capital history  
(Since January 1, 2011)  
1.6.1. For fiscal year 2011  
April 28, 2011  
Acknowledgement of the subscription to 8,902,717 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, as part of the capital  
increase reserved for Group Employees approved by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2010, raising the share  
capital by 22,256,792.50 from 5,874,102,327.50 to 5,896,359,120.  
January 12, 2012 Acknowledgement of the issuance of 5,223,665 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, through the exercise  
of stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2011, raising the share capital by 13,059,162.50 from  
5,896,359,120 to 5,909,418,282.50.  
1.6.2. For fiscal year 2012  
July 2, 2012  
Acknowledgement of the issuance of 1,366,950 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, as part of the global free  
TOTAL share plan to Group Employees decided by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010, raising the share capital  
by 3,417,375 from 5,909,418,282.50 to 5,912,835,657.50.  
January 8, 2013  
Acknowledgement of the issuance of 798,883 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, through the exercise  
of stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2012, raising the share capital by 1,997,207.50 from  
5,912,835,657.50 to 5,914,832,865.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
225  
 
General information  
9
Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
1.6.3. For fiscal year 2013  
April 25, 2013  
Acknowledgement of the issuance of 10,802,215 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, as part of the capital increase  
reserved for Group Employees approved by the Board of Directors on September 18, 2012, raising the share capital  
by 27,005,537.50 from 5,914,832,865 to 5,941,838,402.50.  
January 8, 2014  
Acknowledgement of the issuance of 942,799 new shares, par value 2.50 per share, through the exercise  
of stock options between January 1 and December 31, 2013, raising the share capital by 2,356,997.50 from  
5,941,838,402.50 to 5,944,195,400.  
2. Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
2.1. General information concerning the Company  
2.1.1. Name  
2.1.6. By laws  
TOTAL S.A.  
On file with K.L. Associés, Notaries in Paris  
2.1.2. Headquarters  
2.1.7. APE Code (NAF)  
2, place Jean Millier, La Défense 6, 92400 Courbevoie (France)  
111Z until January 7, 2008  
7010Z since January 8, 2008  
2.1.3. Legal form and nationality  
A French “société anonyme” (limited liability company)  
2.1.8. Term  
99 years from March 22, 2000, to expire on March 22, 2099,  
2.1.4. Trade Registry  
unless dissolved prior to this date or extended  
542 051 180 RCS Nanterre  
2.1.9. Fiscal year  
2.1.5. EC Registration Number  
From January 1 to December 31 of each year  
FR. 59 542 051 180  
2.2. Summary of the Company’s purpose  
The direct and indirect purpose of the Company is to search for  
and extract mining deposits in all countries, particularly hydrocarbons  
in all forms, and to perform industrial refining, processing and trading  
in said materials as well as their derivatives and by-products,  
as well as all activities relating to production  
and distribution of all forms of energy, as well as the chemicals  
sector in all of its forms and to the rubber and health sectors.  
The complete details of the Company’s corporate purpose are  
set forth in Article 3 of the by laws.  
226  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
General information  
Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
9
2.3. Provisions of the by laws governing the administration and management bodies  
2
.3.1. Election of directors and term of office  
2.3.4. Minimum interest in the Company  
held by directors  
Directors are elected by the Shareholders’ Meeting for a 3-year  
term up to a maximum number of directors authorized by law  
Each director (other than the director representing the employee  
shareholders) must own at least 1,000 shares of stock during his  
term of office. If he ceases to own the required number of shares,  
he may, however, adjust his position subject to the conditions set  
by law. The director representing employee shareholders must hold,  
during his term of office, either individually or through a Company  
Savings Plan (“Fonds Commun de Placement d’Entreprise” – FCPE)  
governed by Article L. 214-40 of the French Monetary and Finance  
Code, at least one share or a number of units in said fund  
equivalent to at least one share.  
(currently 18), subject to the legal provisions that allow the term  
to be extended until the next Shareholders’ Meeting called to  
approve the financial statements for the previous fiscal year.  
In addition, one director representing the employee shareholders  
is also elected by the Shareholders’ Meeting for a 3-year term from  
a list of at least two candidates pre-selected by the employee  
shareholders under the conditions provided for by the laws,  
regulations and by laws in force. However, his term shall expire  
automatically once this Director is no longer an employee or  
a shareholder. The Board of Directors may meet and conduct  
valid deliberations until the date his replacement is named.  
2.3.5. Majority rules for Board meetings  
Decisions are adopted by a majority vote of the Directors present  
or represented. In the event of a tie vote, the Chairman shall cast  
the deciding vote.  
2
.3.2. Age limit of directors  
On the closing date of each fiscal year, the number of individual  
directors over the age of 70 may not be greater than one-third  
of the directors in office.  
2.3.6. Rules of procedure of the Board and  
Committees of the Board of Directors  
If this percentage is exceeded, the oldest Board member is  
automatically considered to have resigned.  
See Chapter 5, point 1. (Corporate Governance – Report of the  
Chairman of the Board of Directors) of this Registration Document.  
The director permanent representative of a legal entity must be  
under 70 years old.  
2.3.7. Form of Management  
2
.3.3. Age limit of the Chairman  
The Management of the Company is assumed either by the  
Chairman of the Board of Directors (who then holds the title of the  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), or by another person  
appointed by the Board of Directors with the title of Chief Executive  
Officer. It is the responsibility of the Board of Directors to choose  
between these two forms of management under the majority rules  
described above.  
and the Chief Executive Officer  
The duties of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive  
Officer automatically cease on their 65th birthday at the latest.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting of May 15, 2009, approved an  
amendment of the by laws pertaining to the rules relating to the  
nomination of the Chairman. The amendment allows the Board,  
as an exception to the applicable 65-year age limit, to appoint as  
Chairman of the Board for a period of up to two years a director  
who is more than 65 years old but less than 70 years old.  
On May 21, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to reunify the  
positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and appointed  
the Chief Executive Officer in the position of Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer (refer to Chapter 5, point 1.7.1. for more details).  
At its meeting held on February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors of  
TOTAL S.A. decided to propose at the May 16, 2014 Shareholders’  
Meeting the approval of various amendments to TOTAL S.A.’s  
bylaws, amongst which two amendments are intended, on one  
hand, to raise the age limit of the Chairman from 65 to 70 years,  
and on the other hand, to raise the age limit of the Chief Executive  
Officer from 65 to 67 years.  
The Management Form selected remains in effect until a decision  
to the contrary is made by the Board of Directors.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
227  
 
General information  
9
Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
2.4. Rights, privileges and restrictions attached to the shares  
In addition to the right to vote, each share entitles the holder to a  
portion of the corporate assets, distributions of profits and liquidation  
dividend which is proportional to the number of shares issued,  
subject to the laws and regulations in force and the by laws.  
Because of the fact that in such circumstances the limitation no  
longer applies, such limitation on voting rights cannot prevent or  
delay any takeover of the Company, except in case of a public  
tender offer where the bidder does not acquire at least two-thirds  
of the Company’s shares.  
With the exception of the double voting right, no privilege is attached  
to a specific class of shares or to a specific class of shareholders.  
2.4.3. Fractional rights  
2
.4.1. Double voting rights  
Whenever it is necessary to own several shares in order to exercise  
a right, a number of shares less than the number required does not  
give the owners any right with respect to the Company; in such case,  
the shareholders are responsible for aggregating the required number  
of shares.  
Double voting rights, in relation to the portion of share capital they  
represent, are granted to all fully paid-up registered shares held  
continuously in the name of the same shareholder for at least two  
years(1), and to additional registered shares allotted to a shareholder  
in connection with a capital increase by capitalization of reserves,  
profits or premiums on the basis of the existing shares which entitle  
the shareholder to a double voting right.  
2.4.4. Statutory allocation of profits  
The net profit for the period is equal to the net income minus  
general expenses and other personnel expenses, all amortization  
and depreciation of the assets, and all provisions for commercial  
and industrial contingencies.  
2.4.2. Limitation of voting rights  
Article 18 of the Company’s by laws provides that at Shareholders’  
Meetings, no shareholder may cast, by himself or through his agent,  
on the basis of the single voting rights attached to the shares he  
holds directly or indirectly and the shares for which he holds powers,  
more than 10% of the total number of voting rights attached to the  
Company’s shares. In the case of double voting rights, by himself  
or through his agent, this limit may be exceeded, taking only the  
resulting additional voting rights into account, provided that the total  
voting rights that he exercises do not exceed 20% of the total voting  
rights associated with the shares in the Company.  
From this profit, minus prior losses, if any, the following items are  
deducted in the order indicated:  
1) 5% to constitute the legal reserve fund, until said fund reaches  
10% of the share capital;  
2) the amounts set by the Shareholders’ Meeting to fund reserves  
for which it determines the allocation or use; and  
3) the amounts that the Shareholders’ Meeting decides to retain.  
The remainder is paid to the shareholders as dividends.  
The Board of Directors may pay interim dividends.  
Moreover, Article 18 of the by laws also provides that the limitation  
on voting rights no longer applies, absent any decision of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting, if an individual or a legal entity acting solely  
or together with one or more individuals or entities acquires at least  
two-thirds of the Company’s shares following a public tender offer  
for all the Company’s shares. In that case, the Board of Directors  
acknowledges that the limitation no longer applies and carries out  
the necessary procedure to modify the Company’s by laws accordingly.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting held to approve the financial statements  
for the fiscal year may decide to grant shareholders an option,  
for all or part of the dividend or interim dividends, between payment  
of the dividend in cash or in shares.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting may decide at any time, but only based  
on a proposal by the Board of Directors, to make a full or partial  
distribution of the amounts in the reserve accounts, either in cash  
or in Company shares.  
Once acknowledged, the fact that the limitation no longer applies is  
final and applies to all Shareholders’ Meetings following the public  
tender offer under which the acquisition of at least two-third of the  
overall number of shares of the Company was made possible, and  
not solely to the first meeting following that public tender offer.  
Dividends which have not been claimed at the end of a 5-year period  
are forfeited to the French government.  
(
1) This term is not interrupted and the right acquired is retained in case of a conversion of bearer to bearer pursuant to intestate or testamentary succession, share of community property  
between spouses or donation to the spouse or relatives entitled to inherit (Article 18 § 6 of by laws).  
228  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
General information  
Articles of incorporation and by laws; other information  
9
2.5. Amending shareholders’ rights  
Any amendment to the by laws must be approved or authorized by the Shareholders’ Meeting voting with the quorum and majority required  
by the laws and regulations governing Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meetings.  
2.6. Shareholders’ Meetings  
2
.6.1. Notice of meetings  
record is obtained under a certificate of participation (“attestation  
de participation”) delivered to the shareholder. This registration or  
recording of the shares must be effective no later than a “record  
date” at 0:00 a.m. (Paris time) the third business days preceding  
the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting. If, after having received such  
a certificate, shares are sold or transferred prior to this record date,  
the certificate of participation will be canceled and the votes sent  
by mail or proxies granted to the Company for such shares will be  
canceled accordingly. If shares are sold or transferred after this  
record date, the certificate of participation will remain valid and  
votes cast or proxies granted will be taken into account.  
Shareholders’ Meetings are convened and conducted under the  
conditions provided for by law.  
2.6.2. Admission to meetings  
Participation in any form in Shareholders’ Meetings is subject to  
registration or record of participating shares. Shares must either be  
held in the registered account maintained by the Company (or its  
securities agent) or recorded in bearer form in a securities account  
maintained by a financial intermediary. Proof of this registration or  
2.7. Thresholds to be declared according to the by laws  
Any individual or entity who directly or indirectly acquires a percentage  
of the share capital, voting rights or rights giving future access to  
the share capital of the Company which is equal to or greater than  
of voting rights at Shareholders’ Meetings if, at a meeting, the  
failure to make a declaration is acknowledged and if one or more  
shareholders holding collectively at least 3% of the Company’s  
share capital or voting rights so request at that meeting.  
1%, or a multiple of this percentage, is required to notify the  
Company within fifteen days by registered mail with return receipt  
requested, and declare the number of securities held.  
All individuals and entities are also required to notify the Company  
in due form and within the time limits stated above when their direct  
or indirect holdings fall below each of the thresholds mentioned in  
the first paragraph.  
In case the shares above these thresholds are not declared, as  
specified in the preceding paragraph, any shares held in excess  
of the threshold that should have been declared will be deprived  
2.8. Changes in the share capital  
The Company’s share capital may be changed only under the  
conditions stipulated by the legal and regulatory provisions in force.  
No provision of the by laws, charter, or internal regulations provide  
for more stringent conditions than the law governing changes in the  
Company’s share capital.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
229  
 
General information  
9
Historical financial information and other information  
3. Historical financial information and other information  
3.1. 2013, 2012 and 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements  
The Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries (the Group) for the years ended December 31,  
013, 2012 and 2011 were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International  
Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and as adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2013.  
2
3.2. Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A.  
The Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A., the parent company of the Group, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and  
011 were prepared in accordance with French accounting standards as applicable on December 31, 2013.  
2
3.3. Audit of the historical financial information  
The Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year 2013  
which appear in Chapter 10 of this Registration Document were  
certified by the Company’s auditors. A translation of the auditors’  
report on the Consolidated Financial Statements is provided in  
point 1. of Chapter 10, for information purposes only.  
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Statutory Financial  
Statements which appear on pages 194 and 316 of the French  
version of the Registration Document for fiscal year 2012 which  
was filed with the French Financial Markets Authority on March 28,  
2013 (and a translation is reproduced on pages 188 and 308 of  
the English version of such Registration Document for information  
purposes only);  
TOTAL S.A.’s Statutory Financial Statements for the fiscal year  
2013 (under French accounting standards) which appear in  
Chapter 12 of this Registration Document were also certified  
by the Company’s auditors. A translation of the auditors’ report  
on the 2013 Statutory Financial Statements is provided  
in point 2. of Chapter 12, for information purposes only.  
– The Consolidated and Statutory Financial Statements for fiscal  
year 2011, together with the statutory auditors’ reports on the  
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Statutory Financial  
Statements which appear on pages 184 and 302 of the French  
version of the Registration Document for fiscal year 2011 which  
was filed with the French Financial Markets Authority on March 26,  
Pursuant to Article 28 of EC Regulation No 809/2004, are  
incorporated by reference in this Registration Document:  
2012 (and a translation is reproduced on pages 174 and 272 of  
The Consolidated and Statutory Financial Statements for fiscal  
year 2012, together with the statutory auditors’ reports on the  
the English version of such Registration Document for information  
purposes only).  
3.4. Other information  
Financial information other than that contained in Chapter 10 or 12  
of this Registration Document, in particular ratios, statistical data or  
other calculated data, which are used to describe the Group or its  
business performance, is not extracted from the audited financial  
statements of the issuer. Except where otherwise stated, these  
data are based on internal Company data.  
was prepared by the Company based on information available to it,  
using its own calculations or estimates and taking into account the  
U.S. standards to which the Company is subject for this kind of  
information as a result of the listing of its shares (in the form of ADRs)  
on the New York Stock Exchange.  
This Registration Document does not include profit forecasts  
or estimates, under the meaning given to such terms by  
EC Regulation No. 809/2004 dated April 29, 2004, for the period  
after December 31, 2013.  
In particular, the supplemental oil and gas information provided in  
section 11 of this Registration Document is not extracted from the  
audited financial statements of the issuer and was not audited by  
the Company’s statutory auditors. This supplemental information  
230  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
General information  
Documents on display  
9
4. Documents on display  
Documents and information concerning TOTAL S.A., including its  
by laws and the Company’s statutory and Consolidated Financial  
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 or for previous  
fiscal years may be consulted at the Company’s registered office  
pursuant to the legal and regulatory provisions in force.  
Registration Document, an annual report on Form 20-F, in English,  
with the SEC.  
Pursuant to the requirements introduced by Section 302 of the  
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of July 30, 2002, the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company  
have conducted, with the assistance of the General Management,  
an evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  
procedures as defined by U.S. regulations, over the period covered  
by the Form 20-F. For fiscal year 2013, the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the  
disclosure controls and procedures were effective (refer to point  
TOTAL S.A.’s registration documents filed with the French Financial  
Markets Authority (Autorité des marchés financiers) for each of the  
past five fiscal years, the first half financial reports, the first half  
Group presentations of its results and outlook, as well as the  
quarterly financial information, are available on the Company’s  
website (total.com, Investors/Regulated Information in France).  
1.10. of Chapter 5).  
Moreover, in order to meet its obligations related to the listing of its  
shares in the United States, the Company files, along with this  
5. Information on holdings  
5.1. General information  
As of December 31, 2013, there were 898 consolidated subsidiaries,  
of which 809 were fully consolidated and 89 were accounted for  
under the equity method.  
TOTAL S.A.’s equity or of the consolidated net assets of the Group,  
or which has generated at least 10% of the TOTAL S.A.’s net income  
or of the Group’s consolidated net income during the last year.  
TOTAL S.A.’s scope of consolidation includes at least all companies  
in which the Company holds a direct or indirect interest, the book  
value of which on that date is at least equal to 10% of the amount of  
A list of the principal companies consolidated by TOTAL S.A. is  
provided in a summary table in Note 35 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements of this Registration Document (point 7., Chapter 10).  
5.2. Significant changes in the Group’s interests  
in listed companies in 2011, 2012 and 2013  
5
.2.1. TOTAL’s interest in Novatek  
through its subsidiary Total E&P Arctic Russia, 515,067,590 shares  
out of a total of 3,036,306,000 outstanding shares, representing  
In March 2011, TOTAL signed an agreement in principle to acquire  
a 12.09% capital interest in Novatek, a Russian company listed on  
the Moscow Interbank Currency Exchange and the London Stock  
Exchange, with both parties intending TOTAL to increase its stake  
to 15% within 12 months and to 19.40% within 36 months.  
16.96% of Novatek’s share capital and voting rights.  
5.2.2. TOTAL’s interest in SunPower  
In April 2011, SunPower, an American company listed on the  
NASDAQ, and TOTAL signed a strategic agreement for the  
acquisition by TOTAL, through a friendly takeover bid, of 60% of  
SunPower’s outstanding shares for a price of $23.25 per share,  
totaling around $1.4 billion. The friendly takeover bid was  
concluded successfully in June 2011.  
TOTAL acquired its 12.09% capital interest in Novatek in April 2011  
by purchasing shares from Novatek’s two major shareholders.  
Further to this transaction, TOTAL is now represented on the  
Novatek Board of Directors.  
TOTAL raised its stake to 14.09% in December 2011, by acquiring an  
additional 2% capital interest in Novatek from its two major shareholders,  
in the framework of the agreement concluded in March 2011.  
TOTAL also signed in 2011 a five-year financial guarantee agreement  
with SunPower for a maximum amount of $1 billion, as well as a  
liquidity support agreement for a maximum amount of $600 million  
for a maximum 5-year term.  
In 2012 and 2013, TOTAL proceeded to the acquisition of shares in  
Novatek on a gradual basis. As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held,  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
231  
 
General information  
9
Information on holdings  
In January 2012, TOTAL’s interest in SunPower increased to 66%  
as the result of capital increase coinciding with the Tenesol  
transaction (see section 4.2.1.1., Chapter 2).  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL held, through its subsidiary Total  
Gas & Power USA, 78,576,682 shares out of a total of 121,535,913  
outstanding shares, representing 64.65% of SunPower’s share  
capital and voting rights.  
5.2.3. TOTAL’s interest in Sanofi  
In fiscal year 2012, TOTAL sold the remainder of its holding in  
Sanofi, held indirectly through its subsidiary Elf Aquitaine.  
Over the years 2010 and 2011, TOTAL’s interest in Sanofi  
successively changed from 7.33% of the outstanding shares and  
12.29% of the voting rights on December 31, 2009, to 5.51%  
of the outstanding shares and 9.15% of the voting rights on  
December 31, 2010, and then to 3.22% of the outstanding shares  
and 5.46% of the voting rights on December 31, 2011.  
232  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
9.Comptes consolidés  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
The Management report was approved by the Board of Directors on February 11, 2014  
and has not been updated with subsequent events.  
1.  
2.  
3.  
4.  
5.  
6.  
7.  
Statutory auditor’s report on the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Consolidated statement of income  
234  
235  
236  
237  
238  
239  
240  
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income  
Consolidated balance sheet  
Consolidated statement of cash flow  
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .240  
Accounting policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .241  
Main indicators - information by business segment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .248  
Changes in the Group structure, main acquisitions and divestments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .249  
Business segment information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .250  
Information by geographical area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .261  
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .261  
Other income and other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .261  
Other financial income and expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .262  
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .262  
Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .264  
Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .265  
Equity affiliates: investments and loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .267  
Other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .270  
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .271  
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .272  
Accounts receivable and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .273  
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .274  
Employee benefits obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .277  
Provisions and other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .280  
Financial debt and related financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .282  
Other creditors and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .289  
Lease contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .290  
Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .291  
Related parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .294  
Share-based payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .295  
Payroll and staff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301  
Statement of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .302  
Financial assets and liabilities analysis per instruments class and strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .303  
Fair value of financial instruments (excluding commodity contracts) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .306  
Financial instruments related to commodity contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .312  
Financial risks management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .315  
Other risks and contingent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .322  
Other information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .324  
Changes in progress in the Group structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .324  
Consolidation scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .325  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
0)  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
6)  
7)  
8)  
9)  
0)  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
6)  
7)  
8)  
9)  
0)  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
233  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Statutory auditor’s report on the Consolidated Financial Statements  
1
. Statutory auditor’s report  
on the Consolidated Financial Statements  
This is a free translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the Consolidated Financial Statements issued in French and it is  
provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking users.  
The statutory auditors’ report includes information specifically required by French law in such reports, whether modified or not.  
This information is presented below the audit opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements and includes an explanatory paragraph  
discussing the auditors’ assessments of certain significant accounting and auditing matters. These assessments were considered for the  
purpose of issuing an audit opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements taken as a whole and not to provide separate assurance on  
individual account balances, transactions or disclosures.  
This report also includes information relating to the specific verification of information given in the Group’s Management Report.  
This report should be read in conjunction with and construed in accordance with French law and professional auditing standards applicable  
in France.  
Year ended December 31, 2013  
To the Shareholders,  
In compliance with the assignment entrusted to us by your general annual meeting, we hereby report to you, for the year ended  
December 31, 2013, on:  
the audit of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A.;  
the justification of our assessments;  
the specific verification required by law.  
These Consolidated Financial Statements have been approved by the Board of Directors. Our role is to express an opinion on these  
Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audit.  
I. Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements  
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France; those standards require that we plan and perform  
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Consolidated Financial Statements are free of material misstatement. An audit  
involves performing procedures, using sampling techniques or other methods of selection, to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and  
disclosures in the Consolidated Financial Statements. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and  
the reasonableness of accounting estimates made, as well as the overall presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe  
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.  
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the  
group as at December 31, 2013 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial  
Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.  
Without qualifying our opinion, we draw your attention to the matter set out in note “Introduction” to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
which sets out the accounting consequences resulting from the mandatory application of IAS 19 revised “Employee Benefits”.  
II. Justification of our assessments  
In accordance with the requirements of Article L. 823-9 of the French commercial code (Code de commerce) relating to the justification  
of our assessments, we bring to your attention the following matters:  
As stated in note “Introduction” to the Consolidated Financial Statements, some accounting principles applied by TOTAL S.A. involve a significant  
amount of assumptions and estimates. Management reviews these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, by reference to past  
experience and various other factors considered as reasonable which form the basis for assessing the carrying amount of assets and liabilities.  
However, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates, if different assumptions or circumstances apply. These assumptions and estimates  
relate principally to the application of the successful efforts method for the oil and gas activities, the depreciation of long-lived assets, the provisions  
for asset retirement obligations and environmental remediation, the pensions and post-retirements benefits and the income tax computation.  
Detailed information relating to the application of these accounting principles is given in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
In order to assess the reasonableness of management’s estimates, we performed audit procedures, using sampling techniques, that entailed  
the review of the assumptions and calculations on which the estimates are based, the comparison of prior years’ actual results to their  
related estimates and the review of management’s process for approving the estimates. Additionally, the notes to the financial statements  
were reviewed to ensure that appropriate information regarding the estimates used by management had been disclosed.  
These assessments were made as part of our audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements taken as a whole, and therefore contributed  
to the opinion we formed which is expressed in the first part of this report.  
III. Specific verification  
As required by law we have also verified, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the information related to the group,  
presented in the Management Report.  
We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and its consistency with the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Paris-La Défense, March 6, 2014  
The statutory auditors  
French original signed by  
KPMG Audit  
A division of KPMG S.A.  
Jay Nirsimloo  
ERNST & YOUNG Audit  
Pascal Macioce  
Laurent Vitse  
234  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Consolidated statement of income 10  
2. Consolidated statement of income  
TOTAL  
For the year ended December 31,  
(
M)(a)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Sales  
Excise taxes  
Revenues from sales  
(Notes 4 & 5)  
189,542  
(17,887)  
171,655  
200,061  
(17,762)  
182,299  
184,693  
(18,143)  
166,550  
Purchases net of inventory variation  
Other operating expenses  
Exploration costs  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests  
Other income  
Other expense  
(Note 6)  
(Note 6)  
(Note 6)  
(121,113)  
(21,687)  
(1,633)  
(9,031)  
1,725  
(126,798)  
(22,784)  
(1,446)  
(9,525)  
1,462  
(113,892)  
(19,792)  
(1,019)  
(7,506)  
1,946  
(Note 7)  
(Note 7)  
(2,105)  
(915)  
(1,247)  
Financial interest on debt  
Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents  
Cost of net debt  
(670)  
64  
(606)  
(671)  
100  
(571)  
(713)  
273  
(440)  
(Note 29)  
Other financial income  
Other financial expense  
(Note 8)  
(Note 8)  
524  
(529)  
558  
(499)  
609  
(429)  
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates  
Income taxes  
(Note12)  
(Note 9)  
2,571  
(11,110)  
2,010  
(13,035)  
1,925  
(14,091)  
Consolidated net income  
8,661  
10,756  
12,614  
Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
8,440  
221  
10,609  
147  
12,309  
305  
Earnings per share ()  
Fully-diluted earnings per share ()  
3.73  
3.72  
4.70  
4.68  
5.48  
5.45  
(a) Except for per share amounts.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
235  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income  
3. Consolidated statement of comprehensive income  
TOTAL  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Consolidated net income  
8,661  
10,756  
12,614  
Other comprehensive income  
Actuarial gains and losses  
Tax effect  
513  
(216)  
(911)  
362  
(533)  
191  
Items not potentially reclassifiable to profit and loss  
297  
(549)  
(342)  
Currency translation adjustment  
Available for sale financial assets  
Cash flow hedge  
Share of other comprehensive income of equity affiliates, net amount  
Other  
Tax effect  
(2,199)  
25  
117  
(857)  
(4)  
(702)  
(338)  
65  
160  
(14)  
63  
1,483  
337  
(84)  
(15)  
(3)  
(47)  
(55)  
Items potentially reclassifiable to profit and loss  
Total other comprehensive income (net amount) (Note 17)  
Comprehensive income  
(2,965)  
(2,668)  
5,993  
(766)  
(1,315)  
9,441  
1,663  
1,321  
13,935  
Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
5,910  
83  
9,334  
107  
13,585  
350  
236  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Consolidated Balance Sheet 10  
4. Consolidated balance sheet  
TOTAL  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
ASSETS  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non-current assets  
Intangible assets, net  
(Notes 5 & 10)  
(Notes 5 & 11)  
(Note 12)  
13,341  
75,759  
14,804  
1,207  
1,028  
2,810  
3,195  
12,858  
69,332  
13,759  
1,190  
1,626  
2,279  
2,663  
12,413  
64,457  
12,995  
3,674  
1,976  
2,070  
2,457  
Property, plant and equipment, net  
Equity affiliates: investments and loans  
Other investments  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt  
Deferred income taxes  
(Note 13)  
(Note 20)  
(Note 9)  
(Note 14)  
Other non-current assets  
Total non-current assets  
112,144  
103,707  
100,042  
Current assets  
Inventories, net  
Accounts receivable, net  
Other current assets  
Current financial assets  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Assets classified as held for sale  
(Note 15)  
(Note 16)  
(Note 16)  
(Note 20)  
(Note 27)  
(Note 34)  
16,023  
16,984  
10,798  
536  
14,647  
2,359  
17,397  
19,206  
10,086  
1,562  
15,469  
3,797  
18,122  
20,049  
10,767  
700  
14,025  
-
Total current assets  
Total assets  
61,347  
67,517  
63,663  
173,491  
171,224  
163,705  
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Shareholders’ equity  
Common shares  
5,944  
74,449  
(4,385)  
(3,379)  
5,915  
70,116  
(1,504)  
(3,342)  
5,909  
65,430  
(1,004)  
(3,390)  
Paid-in surplus and retained earnings  
Currency translation adjustment  
Treasury shares  
Total shareholders’ equity - Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
(Note 17)  
72,629  
2,281  
71,185  
1,280  
66,945  
1,352  
Total shareholders’ equity  
74,910  
72,465  
68,297  
Non-current liabilities  
Deferred income taxes  
Employee benefits  
Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
Non-current financial debt  
(Note 9)  
(Note 18)  
(Note 19)  
(Note 20)  
12,943  
3,071  
12,701  
25,069  
12,132  
3,744  
11,585  
22,274  
11,855  
3,385  
10,909  
22,557  
Total non-current liabilities  
53,784  
49,735  
48,706  
Current liabilities  
Accounts payable  
Other creditors and accrued liabilities  
Current borrowings  
Other current financial liabilities  
Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale  
21,958  
13,821  
8,116  
276  
21,648  
14,698  
11,016  
176  
22,086  
14,774  
9,675  
167  
(Note 21)  
(Note 20)  
(Note 20)  
(Note 34)  
626  
1,486  
-
Total current liabilities  
44,797  
49,024  
46,702  
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity  
173,491  
171,224  
163,705  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
237  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Consolidated statement of cash flow  
5. Consolidated statement of cash flow  
TOTAL  
(Note 27)  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Consolidated net income  
8,661  
10,058  
1,171  
-
10,756  
10,481  
1,470  
(362)  
12,614  
8,628  
1,632  
-
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Non-current liabilities, valuation allowances and deferred taxes  
Impact of coverage of pension benefit plans  
(
Gains) losses on disposals of assets  
Undistributed affiliates’ equity earnings  
Increase) decrease in working capital  
(68)  
(1,321)  
211  
1,084  
143  
(1,590)  
(107)  
(1,739)  
98  
(583)  
1,930  
304  
(
Other changes, net  
Cash flow from operating activities  
CASH FLOW USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
21,473  
22,462  
19,536  
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment additions  
Acquisitions of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired  
Investments in equity affiliates and other securities  
Increase in non-current loans  
(22,400)  
(16)  
(1,318)  
(2,188)  
(19,905)  
(191)  
(898)  
(1,949)  
(17,950)  
(854)  
(4,525)  
(1,212)  
Total expenditures  
(25,922)  
(22,943)  
(24,541)  
Proceeds from disposals of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment  
Proceeds from disposals of subsidiaries, net of cash sold  
Proceeds from disposals of non-current investments  
Repayment of non-current loans  
1,329  
1,995  
248  
1,418  
352  
2,816  
1,285  
1,439  
575  
5,691  
873  
1,242  
Total divestments  
4,814  
5,871  
8,578  
Cash flow used in investing activities  
CASH FLOW USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Issuance (repayment) of shares:  
(21,108)  
(17,072)  
(15,963)  
-
-
Parent company shareholders  
Treasury shares  
365  
(179)  
32  
(68)  
481  
-
Dividends paid:  
-
-
Parent company shareholders  
Non controlling interests  
(5,367)  
(118)  
1,621  
8,359  
(6,804)  
978  
(5,184)  
(104)  
1
5,279  
(2,754)  
(947)  
(5,140)  
(172)  
(573)  
4,069  
(3,870)  
896  
Other transactions with non-controlling interests  
Net issuance (repayment) of non-current debt  
Increase (decrease) in current borrowings  
Increase (decrease) in current financial assets and liabilities  
Cash flow used in financing activities  
(1,145)  
(780)  
(3,745)  
1,645  
(4,309)  
(736)  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  
Effect of exchange rates  
(42)  
(201)  
272  
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period  
15,469  
14,025  
14,489  
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period  
14,647  
15,469  
14,025  
238  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity 10  
6. Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’equity  
TOTAL  
(M)  
Common shares issued Paid-in surplus  
Currency  
Treasury shares Shareholders’  
Non-  
Total  
and retained translation  
earnings adjustment  
equity controlling shareholders’  
Number Amount  
Number Amount Group share interests  
equity  
As of January 1, 2011  
before IAS 19 R application 2,349,640,931 5,874  
60,538  
(2,495) (112,487,679) (3,503)  
60,414  
857 61,271  
IAS 19 R impacts  
-
-
(766)  
-
-
-
(766)  
(1)  
(767)  
As of January 1, 2011  
after IAS 19 R application  
2,349,640,931 5,874  
59,772  
(2,495) (112,487,679) (3,503)  
59,648  
856 60,504  
Net income 2011  
Other comprehensive  
income (Note 17)  
-
-
-
12,309  
-
-
-
12,309  
305 12,614  
-
(112)  
1,388  
-
-
1,276  
45  
1,321  
Comprehensive Income  
-
-
12,197  
1,388  
-
-
13,585  
350 13,935  
Dividend  
-
-
35  
-
-
-
(6,457)  
446  
-
(113)  
161  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(6,457)  
(172)  
(6,629)  
Issuance of common shares (Note 17) 14,126,382  
481  
-
-
-
-
-
481  
Purchase of treasury shares  
Sale of treasury shares(a)  
Share-based payments (Note 25)  
Share cancellation (Note 17)  
Other operations  
-
-
-
-
-
113  
-
-
-
-
-
2,933,506  
-
-
161  
-
161  
-
-
-
with non-controlling interests  
Other items  
-
-
-
-
(553)  
(23)  
103  
-
-
-
-
-
(450)  
(23)  
(123)  
441  
(573)  
418  
As of December 31, 2011  
2,363,767,313 5,909  
65,430  
(1,004) (109,554,173) (3,390)  
66,945  
1,352 68,297  
Net income 2012  
Other comprehensive  
income (Note 17)  
-
-
-
10,609  
-
-
-
10,609  
147 10,756  
-
(769)  
(506)  
-
-
(1,275)  
(40)  
(1,315)  
Comprehensive Income  
-
-
9,840  
(506)  
-
-
9,334  
107  
9,441  
Dividend  
-
-
6
-
-
-
(5,237)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(5,237)  
(104)  
(5,341)  
Issuance of common shares (Note 17) 2,165,833  
26  
-
(116)  
146  
-
32  
(68)  
-
146  
-
-
-
-
-
-
32  
(68)  
-
146  
-
Purchase of treasury shares  
Sale of treasury shares(a)  
Share-based payments (Note 25)  
Share cancellation (Note 17)  
Other operations  
-
-
-
-
(1,800,000)  
2,962,534  
(68)  
116  
-
-
-
-
-
with non-controlling interests  
Other items  
-
-
-
-
11  
16  
6
-
-
-
-
-
17  
16  
(16)  
(59)  
1
(43)  
As of December 31, 2012  
2,365,933,146 5,915  
70,116  
(1,504) (108,391,639) (3,342)  
71,185  
1,280 72,465  
Net income 2013  
Other comprehensive  
income (Note 17)  
-
-
-
8,440  
-
-
-
8,440  
221  
8,661  
-
360  
(2,890)  
-
-
(2,530)  
(138)  
(2,668)  
Comprehensive Income  
-
-
8,800  
(2,890)  
-
-
5,910  
83  
5,993  
Dividend  
-
-
29  
-
-
-
(5,358)  
336  
-
(142)  
142  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(5,358)  
365  
(179)  
-
(118)  
(5,476)  
365  
(179)  
-
Issuance of common shares (Note 17) 11,745,014  
-
(179)  
142  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Purchase of treasury shares  
Sale of treasury shares(a)  
Share-based payments (Note 25)  
Share cancellation (Note 17)  
Other operations with  
-
-
-
-
(4,414,200)  
3,591,391  
-
-
142  
-
142  
-
-
-
non-controlling interests  
Other items  
-
-
-
-
548  
7
9
-
-
-
-
-
557  
7
1,027  
9
1,584  
16  
As of December 31, 2013  
2,377,678,160 5,944  
74,449  
(4,385) (109,214,448) (3,379)  
72,629  
2,281 74,910  
(a) Treasury shares related to the restricted stock grants.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
239  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
7. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
On February 11, 2014, the Board of Directors established and authorized the publication of the Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A.  
for the year ended December 31, 2013, which will be submitted for approval to the shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 16, 2014.  
Introduction  
The Consolidated Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. and its  
subsidiaries (the Group) are presented in Euros and have been  
prepared on the basis of IFRS (International Financial Reporting  
Standards) as adopted by the European Union and IFRS as issued  
by the IASB (International Accounting Standard Board) as of  
December 31, 2013.  
– The application of standards IFRS 13 “Fair value measurement”  
and IAS 1 revised “Presentation of financial statements” did not  
have a material effect on the Group’s Consolidated Balance  
Sheet, Statement of Income and shareholder’s equity as of  
December 31, 2013.  
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS  
requires the management to make estimates and assumptions that  
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingent  
liabilities at the date of preparation of the financial statements and  
reported income and expenses for the period. The management  
reviews these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, by  
reference to past experience and various other factors considered  
as reasonable which form the basis for assessing the carrying  
amount of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ significantly  
from these estimates, if different assumptions or circumstances  
apply. These judgments and estimates relate principally to the  
application of the successful efforts method for the oil and gas  
accounting, the valuation of long-lived assets, the provisions for asset  
retirement obligations and environmental remediation, the pensions  
and post-retirements benefits and the income tax computation.  
The accounting principles applied in the Consolidated Financial  
Statements as of December 31, 2013 were the same as those that  
were used as of December 31, 2012 except for amendments and  
interpretations of IFRS which were mandatory for the periods  
beginning after January 1, 2013 (and not early adopted).  
The revised standard IAS 19 “Employee benefits” applicable  
retrospectively from January 1 , 2013, led in particular to the  
st  
full recognition of the net position in respect of employee benefits  
obligations (liabilities net of assets) in the balance sheet, to the  
elimination of the corridor approach previously used by the  
Group, the elimination of the depreciation of past services costs,  
and to the obligation to evaluate the expected return on plan  
assets on a normative basis (via the discount rate used to value  
the debt).  
Furthermore, where the accounting treatment of a specific  
transaction is not addressed by any accounting standard or  
interpretation, the management applies its judgment to define  
and apply accounting policies that provide information consistent  
with the general IFRS concepts: faithful representation, relevance  
and materiality.  
st  
The application of this standard had an impact on January 1 ,  
s
t
s
t
2013, on January 1 , 2012 and on January 1 , 2011 of an  
increase in employee benefit provisions of 2.8 billion, 1.8  
billion and 1.3 billion respectively, and a respective decrease in  
equity of 2.8 billion, 1.8 billion and 1.3 billion before tax  
(
1.7 billion, 1.1 billion and 0.8 billion after tax). The impact  
on the profit for 2012 and 2011 is not significant. In accordance  
with the transitional rules of IAS 19 revised, the comparative  
periods were restated to take into account the retrospective  
application of the standard.  
Change in presentation currency  
of the Consolidated Financial Statements  
To make the financial information of the Group more readable and  
to better reflect the performance of its activities mainly carried out  
in U.S. dollars, Total decided to change, effective January 1, 2014,  
the presentation currency of the Consolidated Financial Statements  
from the euro to the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of TOTAL S.A.,  
the parent company of the Group remain prepared in euro.  
The dividend paid therefore remains fixed in euro.  
Application of standards on consolidation: IFRS 10 “Consolidated  
Financial Statements”, IFRS 11 “Joint arrangements”, IFRS 12  
“Disclosure of interests in other entities”, IAS 27 revised “Separate  
financial statements” and IAS 28 revised “Investments in associates  
and joint ventures”. The application of these standards did not  
have a material effect on the Group’s Consolidated balance  
sheet, income statement and shareholder’s equity as of  
December 31, 2013.  
Following this change in accounting policy, the comparative  
Consolidated Financial Statements will be presented in U.S. dollars.  
240  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
1) Accounting policies  
Pursuant to the accrual basis of accounting followed by the Group,  
the financial statements reflect the effects of transactions and other  
events when they occur. Assets and liabilities such as property, plant  
and equipment and intangible assets are usually measured at cost.  
Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value when required by  
the standards.  
C) Foreign currency translation  
The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared in the  
currency that most clearly reflects their business environment.  
This is referred to as their functional currency.  
(i) Monetary transactions  
Accounting policies used by the Group are described below:  
Transactions denominated in foreign currencies other than the  
functional currency of the entity are translated at the exchange rate  
on the transaction date. At each balance sheet date, monetary  
assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate and the resulting  
exchange differences are recognized in the statement of income.  
A) Principles of consolidation  
Entities that are directly controlled by the parent company or  
indirectly controlled by other consolidated entities are fully  
consolidated.  
(ii) Translation of financial statements  
denominated in foreign currencies  
Investments in joint ventures are consolidated under the equity  
method. The Group accounts for joint operations by recognizing  
its share of assets, liabilities, income and expenses.  
Assets and liabilities of foreign entities are translated into euros on  
the basis of the exchange rates at the end of the period. The income  
and cash flow statements are translated using the average exchange  
rates for the period. Foreign exchange differences resulting from  
such translations are either recorded in shareholders’ equity under  
Investments in associates, in which the Group has significant  
influence, are accounted for by the equity method. Significant  
influence is presumed when the Group holds, directly or indirectly  
Currency translation adjustments” (for the Group share) or under  
Non-controlling interests” (for the share of non-controlling interests)  
(e.g. through subsidiaries), 20% or more of the voting rights.  
Companies in which ownership interest is less than 20%, but over  
which the Company is deemed to exercise significant influence,  
are also accounted for by the equity method.  
as deemed appropriate.  
D) Sales and revenues from sales  
All intercompany balances, transactions and income are eliminated.  
Sales figures include excise taxes collected by the Group within the  
course of its oil distribution operations. Excise taxes are deducted  
from sales in order to obtain the “Revenues from sales” indicator.  
B) Business combinations  
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition  
method. This method requires the recognition of the acquired  
identifiable assets, assumed liabilities and any non-controlling  
interests in the companies acquired by the Group at their fair value.  
(
i) Sale of goods  
Revenues from sales are recognized when the significant risks and  
rewards of ownership have been passed to the buyer and when the  
amount is recoverable and can be reasonably measured.  
The value of the purchase price is finalized within one year from  
the acquisition date.  
Revenues from sales of crude oil, natural gas and coal are recorded  
upon transfer of title, according to the terms of the sales contracts.  
The acquirer shall recognize goodwill at the acquisition date,  
being the excess of:  
Revenues from the production of crude oil and natural gas  
properties, in which the Group has an interest with other producers,  
are recognized based on actual volumes sold during the period.  
Any difference between volumes sold and entitlement volumes,  
based on the Group net working interest, is recognized as  
The consideration transferred, the amount of non-controlling  
interests and, in business combinations achieved in stages,  
the fair value at the acquisition date of the investment previously  
held in the acquired company;  
Crude oil and natural gas inventories” or “Other current assets”  
Over the fair value at the acquisition date of acquired identifiable  
assets and assumed liabilities.  
or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities”, as appropriate.  
Quantities delivered that represent production royalties and taxes,  
when paid in cash, are included in oil and gas sales, except for the  
United States and Canada.  
If the consideration transferred is lower than the fair value of  
acquired identifiable assets and assumed liabilities, an additional  
analysis is performed on the identification and valuation of the  
identifiable elements of the assets and liabilities. After having  
completed such additional analysis any residual negative goodwill  
is recorded as income.  
Certain transactions within the trading activities (contracts involving  
quantities that are purchased from third parties then resold to third  
parties) are shown at their net value in sales.  
Exchanges of crude oil and petroleum products within normal  
Trading activities do not generate any income and therefore these  
flows are shown at their net value in both the statement of income  
and the balance sheet.  
In transactions with non-controlling interests, the difference  
between the price paid (received) and the book value of non-  
controlling interests acquired (sold) is recognized directly in equity.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
241  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
(
ii) Sale of services  
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates  
that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the balance  
sheet date. The tax rates used depend on the timing of reversals  
of temporary differences, tax losses and other tax credits. The effect  
of a change in tax rate is recognized either in the Consolidated  
statement of income or in shareholders’ equity depending on the  
item it relates to.  
Revenues from services are recognized when the services have  
been rendered.  
Revenues from gas transport are recognized when services are  
rendered. These revenues are based on the quantities transported  
and measured according to procedures defined in each service  
contract.  
Deferred tax assets are recognized when future recovery  
is probable.  
Shipping revenues and expenses from time-charter activities are  
recognized on a pro rata basis over a period that commences  
upon the unloading of the previous voyage and terminates upon  
the unloading of the current voyage. Shipping revenue recognition  
starts only when a charter has been agreed to by both the Group  
and the customer.  
Asset retirement obligations and finance leases give rise to the  
recognition of assets and liabilities for accounting purposes as  
described in paragraph K “Leases” and paragraph Q “Asset  
retirement obligations” of this Note. Deferred income taxes resulting  
from temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax  
bases of such assets and liabilities are recognized.  
(iii) Solar Farm Development Projects  
SunPower develops and sells solar farm projects. This activity  
generally contains a property component (land ownership or an  
interest in land rights). The revenue associated with the development  
of these projects is recognized when the entities-projects and land  
rights are irrevocably sold.  
Deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences between the  
carrying amounts of equity-method investments and their tax bases  
are recognized. The deferred tax calculation is based on the  
expected future tax effect (dividend distribution rates or tax rates  
on capital gains).  
Revenues under contracts for construction of solar systems are  
recognized based on the progress of construction works, measured  
according to the percentage of costs incurred relative to total  
forecast costs.  
G) Earnings per share  
Earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (Group share)  
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding  
during the period, excluding TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A.  
(Treasury shares) and TOTAL shares held by the Group subsidiaries  
which are deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
E) Share-based payments  
The Group may grant employees stock options, create employee  
share purchase plans and offer its employees the opportunity to  
subscribe to reserved capital increases. These employee benefits  
are recognized as expenses with a corresponding credit to  
shareholders’ equity.  
Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income  
(Group share) by the fully-diluted weighted-average number of  
common shares outstanding during the period. Treasury shares  
held by the parent company, TOTAL S.A., and TOTAL shares  
held by the Group subsidiaries are deducted from consolidated  
shareholders’ equity. These shares are not considered outstanding  
for purposes of this calculation which also takes into account the  
dilutive effect of stock options, share grants and capital increases  
with a subscription period closing after the end of the fiscal year.  
The expense is equal to the fair value of the instruments granted.  
The expense is recognized on a straight-line basis between the  
grant date and vesting date.  
The fair value of the options is calculated using the Black-Scholes  
model at the grant date.  
The weighted-average number of fully-diluted shares is calculated  
in accordance with the treasury stock method provided for by IAS  
33. The proceeds, which would be recovered in the event of an  
exercise of rights related to dilutive instruments, are presumed to  
be a share buyback at the average market price over the period.  
The number of shares thereby obtained leads to a reduction in the  
total number of shares that would result from the exercise of rights.  
For restricted share plans, the fair value is calculated using the  
market price at the grant date after deducting the expected  
distribution rate during the vesting period.  
The number of allocated equity instruments can be revised during  
the vesting period in cases of non compliance with performance  
conditions, with the exception of those related to the market,  
or according to the rate of turnover of the beneficiaries.  
H) Oil and gas exploration and producing properties  
The cost of employee-reserved capital increases is immediately  
expensed. A discount reduces the expense in order to account  
for the non-transferability of the shares awarded to the employees  
over a period of five years.  
The Group applies IFRS 6 “Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral  
Resources”. Oil and gas exploration and production properties and  
assets are accounted for in accordance with the successful efforts  
method.  
F) Income taxes  
(i) Exploration costs  
Income taxes disclosed in the statement of income include the  
current tax expenses and the deferred tax expenses.  
Geological and geophysical costs, including seismic surveys for  
exploration purposes are expensed as incurred.  
The Group uses the method whereby deferred income taxes are  
recorded based on the temporary differences between the carrying  
amounts of assets and liabilities recorded in the balance sheet and their  
tax bases, and on carry-forwards of unused tax losses and tax credits.  
Mineral interests are capitalized as intangible assets when acquired.  
These acquired interests are tested for impairment on a regular  
basis, property-by-property, based on the results of the exploratory  
activity and the management’s evaluation.  
242  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
In the event of a discovery, the unproved mineral interests are  
transferred to proved mineral interests at their net book value as  
soon as proved reserves are booked.  
Guidance for calculating goodwill is presented in Note 1 paragraph  
B to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Goodwill is not  
amortized but is tested for impairment annually or as soon as there  
is any indication of impairment (see Note 1 paragraph L to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements).  
Exploratory wells are tested for impairment on a well-by-well basis  
and accounted for as follows:  
In equity affiliates, goodwill is included in the investment book value.  
Costs of exploratory wells which result in proved reserves are  
capitalized and then depreciated using the unit-of-production  
method based on proved developed reserves;  
Other intangible assets (except goodwill) have a finite useful life and  
are amortized on a straight-line basis over 3 to 20 years depending  
on the useful life of the assets.  
Costs of dry exploratory wells and wells that have not found  
proved reserves are charged to expense;  
Research and development  
Costs of exploratory wells are temporarily capitalized until a  
determination is made as to whether the well has found proved  
reserves if both of the following conditions are met:  
Research costs are charged to expense as incurred.  
Development expenses are capitalized when the following can be  
demonstrated:  
-
the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify  
its completion as a producing well, if appropriate, assuming  
that the required capital expenditures are made;  
the technical feasibility of the project and the availability of the  
adequate resources for the completion of the intangible asset;  
-
the Group is making sufficient progress assessing the reserves  
and the economic and operating viability of the project.  
This progress is evaluated on the basis of indicators such as  
whether additional exploratory works are under way or firmly  
planned (wells, seismic or significant studies), whether costs  
are being incurred for development studies and whether  
the Group is waiting for governmental or other third-party  
authorization of a proposed project, or availability of capacity  
on an existing transport or processing facility.  
− the ability of the asset to generate probable future economic  
benefits;  
the ability to measure reliably the expenditures attributable  
to the asset; and  
− the feasibility and intention of the Group to complete the intangible  
asset and use or sell it.  
Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred.  
Costs of exploratory wells not meeting these conditions are  
charged to expense.  
J) Other property, plant and equipment  
Other property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, after  
deducting any accumulated depreciation and accumulated  
impairment losses. This cost includes borrowing costs directly  
attributable to the acquisition or production of a qualifying asset  
incurred until assets are placed in service. Borrowing costs are  
capitalized as follows:  
(ii) Oil and Gas producing assets  
Development costs incurred for the drilling of wells and for the  
construction of production and treatment facilities are capitalized,  
together with borrowing costs incurred during the period  
of construction and the present value of estimated future costs  
of asset retirement obligations. The depletion rate is usually equal  
to the ratio of oil and gas production for the period to proved  
developed reserves (unit-of-production method).  
– if the project benefits from a specific funding, the capitalization  
of borrowing costs is based on the borrowing rate;  
if the project is financed by all the Group’s debt, the capitalization  
of borrowing costs is based on the weighted average borrowing  
cost for the period.  
With respect to production sharing contracts, this computation  
is based on the portion of production and reserves assigned to  
the Group taking into account estimates based on the contractual  
clauses regarding the reimbursement of exploration, development  
and production costs (cost oil) as well as the sharing of hydrocarbon  
rights (profit oil).  
Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as  
incurred. The costs of major turnarounds of refineries and large  
petrochemical units are capitalized as incurred and depreciated  
over the period of time between two consecutive major  
turnarounds.  
Transportation assets are depreciated using the unit-of-production  
method based on throughput or by using the straight-line method  
whichever best reflects the duration of use of the economic life  
of the asset.  
Other property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the  
straight-line method over their useful lives, which are as follows:  
Furniture, office equipment, machinery and tools  
Transportation equipments  
Storage tanks and related equipment  
Specialized complex installations and pipelines  
Buildings  
3-12 years  
Proved mineral interests are depreciated using the unit-of-production  
method based on proved reserves.  
5-20 years  
10-15 years  
10-30 years  
10-50 years  
I) Goodwill and other intangible  
assets excluding mineral interests  
Other intangible assets include goodwill, patents, trademarks,  
and lease rights.  
K) Leases  
A finance lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards  
incidental to ownership from the lessor to the lessee. These contracts  
are capitalized as assets at fair value or, if lower, at the present value  
Intangible assets are carried at cost, after deducting any accumulated  
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
243  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
of the minimum lease payments according to the contract.  
A corresponding financial debt is recognized as a financial liability.  
These assets are depreciated over the corresponding useful life  
used by the Group.  
equity. If there is any evidence of a significant or long-lasting  
impairment loss, a loss is recorded in the statement of income.  
This impairment is irreversible.  
(iii) Derivative instruments  
Leases that are not finance leases as defined above are recorded  
as operating leases.  
The Group uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to risks  
of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity  
prices. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized  
in the statement of income or in shareholders’ equity and are  
recognized in the balance sheet in the accounts corresponding to  
their nature, according to the risk management strategy described  
in Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The derivative  
instruments used by the Group are the following:  
Certain arrangements do not take the legal form of a lease but  
convey the right to use an asset or a group of assets in return for  
fixed payments. Such arrangements are accounted for as leases  
and are analyzed to determine whether they should be classified  
as operating leases or as finance leases.  
L) Impairment of long-lived assets  
Cash management  
The recoverable amounts of intangible assets and property, plant and  
equipment are tested for impairment as soon as any indication of  
impairment exists. This test is performed at least annually for goodwill.  
Financial instruments used for cash management purposes are  
part of a hedging strategy of currency and interest rate risks within  
global limits set by the Group and are considered to be used for  
transactions (held for trading). Changes in fair value are systematically  
recorded in the statement of income. The balance sheet value  
of those instruments is included in “Current financial assets”  
or “Other current financial liabilities”.  
The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value (less costs to  
sell) or its value in use.  
Assets are grouped into cash-generating units (or CGUs) and  
tested. A cash-generating unit is a homogeneous group of assets  
that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash  
inflows from other groups of assets.  
Long-term financing  
When an external long-term financing is set up, specifically  
to finance subsidiaries, and when this financing involves currency  
and interest rate derivatives, these instruments are qualified as:  
The value in use of a CGU is determined by reference to the discounted  
expected future cash flows, based upon the management’s  
expectation of future economic and operating conditions.  
When this value is less than the carrying amount of the CGU,  
an impairment loss is recorded. It is allocated first to goodwill in  
counterpart of “Other expenses”. These impairment losses are then  
allocated to “Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible  
assets and mineral interests” for property, plant and mineral  
interests and to “Other expenses” for other intangible assets.  
1
) Fair value hedge of the interest rate risk on the external debt and  
of the currency risk of the loans to subsidiaries. Changes in fair  
value of derivatives are recognized in the statement of income  
as are changes in fair value of underlying financial debts and  
loans to subsidiaries.  
The fair value of those hedging instruments of long-term financing  
is included in the assets under “Hedging instruments on non-current  
financial debt” or in the liabilities under “Non-current financial  
debt “for the non-current portion. The current portion (less  
than one year) is accounted for in “Current financial assets”  
or “Other current financial liabilities”.  
Impairment losses recognized in prior periods can be reversed up  
to the original carrying amount, had the impairment loss not  
been recognized. Impairment losses recognized for goodwill  
cannot be reversed.  
M) Financial assets and liabilities  
In case of the anticipated termination of derivative instruments  
accounted for as fair value hedges, the amount paid or received  
is recognized in the statement of income and:  
Financial assets and liabilities are financial loans and receivables,  
investments in non-consolidated companies, publicly traded equity  
securities, derivatives instruments and current and non-current  
financial liabilities.  
- If this termination is due to an early cancellation of the hedged  
items, the adjustment previously recorded as revaluation  
of those hedged items is also recognized in the statement  
of income;  
The accounting treatment of these financial assets and liabilities  
is as follows:  
-
If the hedged items remain in the balance sheet, the adjustment  
previously recorded as a revaluation of those hedged items is  
spread over the remaining life of those items.  
(i) Loans and receivables  
Financial loans and receivables are recognized at amortized cost.  
They are tested for impairment, by comparing the carrying amount  
of the assets to estimates of the discounted future recoverable  
cash flows. These tests are conducted as soon as there is any  
evidence that their fair value is less than their carrying amount,  
and at least annually. Any impairment loss is recorded in the  
statement of income.  
2) Cash flow hedge of the currency risk of the external debt.  
Changes in fair value are recorded in Other comprehensive  
Income for the effective portion of the hedging and in the  
statement of income for the ineffective portion of the hedging.  
Amounts recorded in equity are transferred to the income  
statement when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.  
(
ii) Other investments  
The fair value of those hedging instruments of long-term  
financing is included in the assets under “Hedging instruments  
on non-current financial debt” or in the liabilities under “Non-current  
financial debt” for the non-current portion. The current portion  
These assets are classified as financial assets available for sale and  
therefore measured at their fair value. For listed securities, this fair  
value is equal to the market price. For unlisted securities, if the fair  
value is not reliably determinable, securities are recorded at their  
historical value. Changes in fair value are recorded in shareholders’  
(less than one year) is accounted for in “Current financial assets”  
or “Other current financial liabilities”.  
244  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
If the hedging instrument expires, is sold or terminated by  
anticipation, gains or losses previously recognized in equity  
remain in equity. Amounts are recycled in the income statement  
only when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.  
Financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
The valuation methodology is to mark to market all open positions  
for both physical and paper transactions. The valuations are  
determined on a daily basis using observable market data based on  
organized and over the counter (OTC) markets. In particular cases  
when market data are not directly available, the valuations are  
derived from observable data such as arbitrages, freight or spreads  
and market corroboration. For valuation of risks which are the result  
of a calculation, such as options for example, commonly known  
models are used to compute the fair value.  
Foreign subsidiaries’ equity hedge  
Certain financial instruments hedge against risks related to the  
equity of foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is not  
the euro (mainly the dollar). These instruments qualify as “net  
investment hedges” and changes in fair value are recorded in Other  
comprehensive income for the effective portion of the hedging and  
in the statement of income for the ineffective portion of the hedging.  
Gains or losses on hedging instruments previously recorded in  
equity, are reclassified to the statement of income in the same  
period as the total or partial disposal of the foreign activity.  
Other financial instruments  
The fair value of the interest rate swaps and of FRA’s (Forward Rate  
Agreements) are calculated by discounting future cash flows on the  
basis of zero coupon interest rate curves existing at year-end after  
adjustment for interest accrued but unpaid.  
The fair value of these instruments is recorded under “Current  
financial assets” or “Other current financial liabilities”.  
Forward exchange contracts and currency swaps are valued on the  
basis of a comparison of the negociated forward rates with the rates  
in effect on the financial markets at year-end for similar maturities.  
Financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
Financial instruments related to commodity contracts, including  
crude oil, petroleum products, gas, power and coal purchase/sales  
contracts within the trading activities, together with the commodity  
contract derivative instruments such as energy contracts and  
forward freight agreements, are used to adjust the Group’s exposure  
to price fluctuations within global trading limits. According to the  
industry practice, these instruments are considered as held for  
trading. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement  
of income. The fair value of these instruments is recorded in  
Exchange options are valued based on the Garman-Kohlhagen  
model including market quotations at year-end.  
Fair value hierarchy  
IFRS 7 “Financial instruments: disclosures”, amended in 2009,  
introduces a fair value hierarchy for financial instruments and  
proposes the following three-level classification:  
level 1: quotations for assets and liabilities (identical to the ones  
that are being valued) obtained at the valuation date on an active  
market to which the entity has access;  
“Other current assets” or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities”  
depending on whether they are assets or liabilities.  
Detailed information about derivatives positions is disclosed in  
Notes 20, 28, 29, 30 and 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
level 2: the entry data are observable data but do not correspond  
to quotations for identical assets or liabilities;  
(iv) Current and non-current financial liabilities  
level 3: the entry data are not observable data. For example:  
these data come from extrapolation. This level applies when  
there is no market or observable data and the company has to  
use its own hypotheses to estimate the data that other market  
players would have used to determine the fair value of the asset.  
Current and non-current financial liabilities (excluding derivatives)  
are recognized at amortized cost, except those for which hedge  
accounting can be applied as described in the previous paragraph.  
(v) Fair value of financial instruments  
Fair value hierarchy is disclosed in Notes 29 and 30 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Fair values are estimated for the majority of the Group’s financial  
instruments, with the exception of publicly traded equity securities  
and marketable securities for which the market price is used.  
(vi) Commitments to purchase shares held by non-controlling  
interests (put options written on minority interests)  
Estimations of fair value, which are based on principles such as  
discounting future cash flows to present value, must be weighted  
by the fact that the value of a financial instrument at a given time  
may be influenced by the market environment (liquidity especially),  
and also the fact that subsequent changes in interest rates and  
exchange rates are not taken into account.  
Put options granted to non-controlling-interest shareholders are  
initially recognized as financial liabilities at the present value of the  
exercise price of the options with a corresponding reduction in  
shareholders’ equity. The financial liability is subsequently measured  
at fair value at each balance sheet date in accordance with  
contractual clauses and any variation is recorded in the statement  
of income (cost of debt).  
As a consequence, the use of different estimates, methodologies  
and assumptions could have a material effect on the estimated fair  
value amounts.  
N) Inventories  
The methods used are as follows:  
Inventories are measured in the Consolidated Financial Statements  
at the lower of historical cost or market value. Costs for petroleum  
and petrochemical products are determined according to the FIFO  
Financial debts, swaps  
The market value of swaps and of bonds that are hedged by those  
swaps has been determined on an individual basis by discounting  
future cash flows with the zero coupon interest rate curves existing  
at year-end.  
(First-In, First-Out) method and other inventories are measured  
using the weighted-average cost method. In addition stocks held  
for trading are measured at fair value less costs of sale.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
245  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Refining & Chemicals  
R) Employee benefits  
Petroleum product inventories are mainly comprised of crude oil  
and refined products. Refined products principally consist of  
gasoline, kerosene, diesel, fuel oil and heating oil produced by  
the Group’s refineries. The turnover of petroleum products does  
not exceed more than two months on average.  
In accordance with the laws and practices of each country, the  
Group participates in employee benefit plans offering retirement,  
death and disability, healthcare and special termination benefits.  
These plans provide benefits based on various factors such  
as length of service, salaries, and contributions made to the  
governmental bodies responsible for the payment of benefits.  
Crude oil costs include raw material and receiving costs. Refining  
costs principally include crude oil costs, production costs (energy,  
labor, depreciation of producing assets) and an allocation of  
production overheads (taxes, maintenance, insurance, etc.).  
These plans can be either defined contribution or defined benefit  
pension plans and may be entirely or partially funded with investments  
made in various non-Group instruments such as mutual funds,  
insurance contracts, and other instruments.  
Costs of chemical product inventories consist of raw material costs,  
direct labor costs and an allocation of production overheads.  
Start-up costs, general administrative costs and financing costs are  
excluded from the cost price of refined and chemicals products.  
For defined contribution plans, expenses correspond to the  
contributions paid.  
Defined benefit obligations are determined according to the  
Projected Unit Method. Actuarial gains and losses may arise from  
differences between actuarial valuation and projected commitments  
Marketing & Services  
The costs of refined products include mainly crude oil costs, production  
costs (energy, labor, depreciation of producing assets) and an allocation  
of production overheads (taxes, maintenance, insurance, etc.).  
(depending on new calculations or assumptions) and between  
projected and actual return of plan assets. Such gains and losses  
are recognized in the statement of comprehensive income, with no  
possibility to subsequently recycle them to the income statement.  
Start-up costs, general administrative costs and financing costs  
are excluded from the cost price of refined products.  
The past service cost is recorded immediately in the statement  
of income, whether vested or unvested.  
Product inventories purchased from entities external to the Group  
are valued at their purchase cost plus primary costs of transport.  
The net periodic pension cost is recognized under “Other operating  
expenses”.  
O) Treasury shares  
Treasury shares of the parent company held by its subsidiaries or  
itself are deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity. Gains or  
losses on sales of treasury shares are excluded from the determination  
of net income and are recognized in shareholders’ equity.  
S) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  
The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows prepared in foreign  
currencies has been translated into euros using the exchange rate  
on the transaction date or the average exchange rate for the period.  
Currency translation differences arising from the translation of  
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency into  
euros using the closing exchange rates are shown in the Consolidated  
Statement of Cash Flows under “Effect of exchange rates”.  
Therefore, the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows will not agree  
with the figures derived from the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  
P) Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
A provision is recognized when the Group has a present obligation  
(legal or constructive) as a result of a past event for which it is  
probable that an outflow of resources will be required and when a  
reliable estimate can be made regarding the amount of the obligation.  
The amount of the liability corresponds to the best possible estimate.  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Provisions and non-current liabilities are comprised of liabilities for  
which the amount and the timing are uncertain. They arise from  
environmental risks, legal and tax risks, litigation and other risks.  
Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash on hand and  
highly liquid short-term investments that are easily convertible into  
known amounts of cash and are subject to insignificant risks of  
changes in value.  
Q) Asset retirement obligations  
Investments with maturities greater than three months and less  
than twelve months are shown under “Current financial assets”.  
Asset retirement obligations, which result from a legal or constructive  
obligation, are recognized based on a reasonable estimate  
in the period in which the obligation arises.  
Changes in current financial assets and liabilities are included in the  
financing activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.  
The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the  
carrying amount of the underlying asset and depreciated over the  
useful life of this asset.  
Non-current financial debt  
Changes in non-current financial debt are presented as the net  
variation to reflect significant changes mainly related to revolving  
credit agreements.  
An entity is required to measure changes in the liability for an asset  
retirement obligation due to the passage of time (accretion) by applying  
a risk-free discount rate to the amount of the liability. The increase  
of the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as “Other  
financial expense”.  
246  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
T) Carbon dioxide emission rights  
V) Non-current assets held for sale  
and discontinued operations  
In the absence of a current IFRS standard or interpretation on  
accounting for emission rights of carbon dioxide, the following  
principles are applied:  
Pursuant to IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and  
discontinued operations”, assets and liabilities of affiliates that are  
held for sale are presented separately on the face of the balance  
sheet. Depreciation of assets ceases from the date of classifcation  
in “Non-current assets held for sale”.  
Emission rights are managed as a cost of production  
and as such are recognized in inventories:  
-
emission rights allocated for free are booked in inventories  
with a nil carrying amount;  
purchased emission rights are booked at acquisition cost;  
sales or annual restorations of emission rights consist of  
decreases in inventories recognized based on a weighted  
average cost;  
Net income from discontinued operations is presented separately  
on the face of the statement of income. Therefore, the notes  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements related to the statement  
of income only refer to continuing operations.  
-
-
A discontinued operation is a component of the Group for which  
cash flows are independent. It represents a major line of business  
or geographical area of operations which has been disposed of or  
is currently being held for sale.  
-
if the carrying amount of inventories at closing date is higher  
than the market value, an impairment loss is recorded.  
At each closing, a provision is recorded in order to materialize the  
obligation of emission rights restoration related to the emissions  
of the period. This provision is calculated based on estimated  
emissions of the period, valued at weighted average cost of the  
inventories at the end of the period. It is reversed when the  
emission rights are restored.  
W) New accounting principles not yet in effect  
The standards or interpretations published respectively by the  
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the  
International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC)  
which were not yet in effect at December 31, 2013, are as follows:  
If emission rights to be delivered at the end of the compliance  
period are higher than emission rights (allocated and purchased)  
booked in inventories, the shortage is accounted for as a liability  
at market value.  
Standards not yet adopted by the European Union  
at December 31, 2013  
In November 2009, the IASB issued standard IFRS 9  
“Financial Instruments” that introduces new requirements  
for the classification and measurement of financial assets, and  
included in October 2010 requirements regarding classification  
and measurement of financial liabilities. This standard shall be  
completed with texts on impairment of financial assets measured  
at amortized cost and hedge accounting. Under standard  
IFRS 9, financial assets and liabilities are generally measured  
either at fair value through profit or loss or at amortized cost if  
certain conditions are met. The standard will not be applicable  
before 2017. The application of the standard as published  
in 2010 should not have any material effect on the Group’s  
consolidated balance sheet, statement of income and  
shareholder’s equity.  
Forward transactions are recognized at their fair market value  
in the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of such forward  
transactions are recognized in the statement of income.  
U) Energy savings certificates  
In the absence of current IFRS standards or interpretations on  
accounting for energy savings certificates, the following principles  
are applied:  
If the obligations linked to the sales of energy are greater than the  
number of ESC’s held then a liability is recorded. These liabilities  
are valued based on the price of the latest transactions;  
In the event that the number of ESC’s held exceeds the  
obligation at the balance sheet date this is accounted for as  
inventory;  
– In May 2013, the IASB issued the interpretation IFRIC 21  
“Levies”. This interpretation is applicable retrospectively for  
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The  
impacts of the application of this interpretation are under review.  
ESC inventories are valued at weighted average cost (acquisition  
cost for those ESC’s acquired or cost incurred for those ESC’s  
generated internally).  
If the carrying value of the inventory of certificates at the balance  
sheet date is higher than the market value, an impairment loss is  
recorded in income.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
247  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
2) Main indicators - information by business segment  
Performance indicators excluding the adjustment items, such as  
adjusted operating income, adjusted net operating income, and  
adjusted net income are meant to facilitate the analysis of the financial  
performance and the comparison of income between periods.  
Main indicators  
(i) Operating income (measure used to evaluate  
operating performance)  
Revenue from sales after deducting cost of goods sold and  
inventory variations, other operating expenses, exploration  
expenses and depreciation, depletion, and amortization.  
Adjustment items  
The detail of these adjustment items is presented in Note 4 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Operating income excludes the amortization of intangible assets  
other than mineral interests, currency translation adjustments and  
gains or losses on the disposal of assets.  
Adjustment items include:  
(i) Special items  
(ii) Net operating income (measure used to evaluate  
Due to their unusual nature or particular significance, certain  
transactions qualified as “special items” are excluded from the  
business segment figures. In general, special items relate to  
transactions that are significant, infrequent or unusual. However,  
in certain instances, transactions such as restructuring costs or  
assets disposals, which are not considered to be representative  
of the normal course of business, may be qualified as special items  
although they may have occurred within prior years or are likely  
to occur again within the coming years.  
the return on capital employed)  
Operating income after taking into account the amortization of  
intangible assets other than mineral interests, currency translation  
adjustments, gains or losses on the disposal of assets, as well  
as all other income and expenses related to capital employed  
(dividends from non-consolidated companies, equity in income  
of affiliates, capitalized interest expenses), and after income taxes  
applicable to the above.  
The only income and expense not included in net operating income  
but included in net income are interest expenses related to net  
financial debt, after applicable income taxes (net cost of net debt)  
and non-controlling interests.  
(
ii) The inventory valuation effect  
The adjusted results of the Refining & Chemicals and  
Marketing & Services segments are presented according to  
the replacement cost method. This method is used to assess  
the segments’ performance and facilitate the comparability  
of the segments’ performance with those of its competitors.  
(iii) Adjusted income  
Operating income, net operating income, or net income excluding  
the effect of adjustment items described above.  
In the replacement cost method, which approximates the LIFO  
(Last-In, First-Out) method, the variation of inventory values in the  
(iv) Fully-diluted adjusted earnings per share  
statement of income is, depending on the nature of the inventory,  
determined using either the month-end prices differential between  
one period and another or the average prices of the period rather  
than the historical value. The inventory valuation effect is the  
difference between the results according to the FIFO (First-In,  
First-Out) and the replacement cost.  
Adjusted net income divided by the fully-diluted weighted-average  
number of common shares.  
(v) Capital employed  
Non-current assets and working capital, at replacement cost,  
net of deferred income taxes and non-current liabilities.  
(iii) Effect of changes in fair value  
(vi) ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed)  
The effect of changes in fair value presented as adjustment items  
reflects for some transactions differences between internal measures  
of performance used by TOTAL’s management and the accounting  
for these transactions under IFRS.  
Ratio of adjusted net operating income to average capital employed  
between the beginning and the end of the period.  
(vii) ROE (Return on Equity)  
IFRS requires that trading inventories be recorded at their fair value  
using period end spot prices. In order to best reflect the management  
of economic exposure through derivative transactions, internal  
indicators used to measure performance include valuations of  
trading inventories based on forward prices.  
Ratio of adjusted consolidated net income to average adjusted  
shareholders’ equity (after distribution) between the beginning and  
the end of the period.  
(viii) Net debt  
Non-current debt, including current portion, current borrowings,  
other current financial liabilities, less cash and cash equivalents  
and other current financial assets.  
Furthermore, TOTAL, in its trading activities, enters into storage  
contracts, which future effects are recorded at fair value in Group’s  
internal economic performance. IFRS precludes recognition of this  
fair value effect.  
248  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
3) Changes in the Group structure, main acquisitions and divestments  
During 2013, 2012 and 2011, main changes in the Group structure  
and main acquisitions and divestments were as follows:  
2012  
Upstream  
2
013  
– TOTAL finalized in February 2012 the acquisition in Uganda of a  
one-third interest in Blocks 1, 2 and 3A held by Tullow Oil plc for  
Upstream  
1,157 million ($1,487 million), entirely consisting of mineral  
TOTAL finalized in February 2013 the acquisition of an additional  
interests. TOTAL became an equal partner with Tullow and CNOOC  
in the Blocks, each with a one-third interest and each being an  
operator of one of the Blocks. TOTAL is the operator of Block 1.  
6% interest in the Ichthys Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) project  
from its partner INPEX. TOTAL’s overall equity stake in the Ichthys  
LNG project increased from 24% to 30%.  
TOTAL finalized during 2012 the acquisition of an additional  
1.25% interest in Novatek for an amount of 368 million  
($480 million), increasing TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek  
to 15.34% as at December 31, 2012.  
TOTAL finalized in February 2013 the sale to INPEX of a 9.99%  
indirect interest in offshore Angola Block 14.  
On March 27, 2013, TOTAL entered into an agreement for the  
sale to Suncor Energy Inc. of its 49% interest in the Voyageur  
upgrader project, which is located in the Canadian province  
of Alberta and intended to upgrade bitumen from the Fort Hills  
and Joslyn mines. The transaction amounted to $506 million  
– TOTAL finalized in October 2012 the sale of its interest in the  
Cusiana field as well as a participation in OAM and ODC pipelines  
in Colombia to Sinochem, for an amount of 318 million  
($409 million), net of cash sold.  
(
381 million). The mining development projects of Fort Hills and  
Holding  
Joslyn continue according to the production evacuation logistics  
studies jointly conducted with Suncor. The sale entails a net loss  
of 1,247 million.  
– During 2012, TOTAL gradually sold its remaining interest in  
Sanofi, generating a net capital gain of 341 million after tax.  
As at the December 31, 2012 the Group retained no further  
interest in the capital of Sanofi.  
TOTAL finalized in June 2013 the sale of a 25% interest in the  
Tempa Rossa field in Italy to Mitsui.  
TOTAL finalized in July 2013 the sale of 100% of Transport et  
Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF) to a consortium comprising  
Snam, EDF and GIC (Government of Singapore Investment  
Corporation) for an amount of 1,558 million, net of cash sold.  
2011  
Upstream  
– TOTAL finalized in March 2011 the acquisition from Santos  
of an additional 7.5% interest in Australia’s GLNG project.  
This increased TOTAL’s overall stake in the project to 27.5%.  
TOTAL finalized in September 2013 the sale of its Upstream  
interests in Trinidad & Tobago to The National Gas Company  
of Trinidad & Tobago for an amount of 236 million  
The acquisition cost amounted to 202 million ($281 million)  
and mainly corresponded to the value of mineral interests that  
have been recognized as intangible assets in the consolidated  
balance sheet for 227 million.  
($318 million), net of cash sold.  
TOTAL finalized in December 2013 the acquisition by Qatar  
Petroleum International Upstream of 15% of the capital of Total  
E&P Congo through a capital increase of 1,225 million  
– In March 2011, Total E&P Canada Ltd., a TOTAL subsidiary, and  
Suncor Energy Inc. (Suncor) finalized a strategic oil sands alliance  
encompassing the Suncor-operated Fort Hills mining project, the  
TOTAL-operated Joslyn mining project and the Suncor-operated  
Voyageur upgrader project. All three assets are located in the  
Athabasca region of the province of Alberta, in Canada.  
(
$1,627 million).  
TOTAL finalized during 2013 the acquisition of an additional  
.62% interest in Novatek for an amount of 437 million  
$587 million), bringing TOTAL’s overall interest in Novatek  
1
(
to 16.96% as at December 31, 2013.  
TOTAL acquired 19.2% of Suncor’s interest in the Fort Hills  
project, increasing TOTAL’s overall interest in the project to  
In October 2013, a consortium in which TOTAL holds a 20%  
interest was awarded a production sharing contract for 35 years  
to develop the Libra oil field in Brazil. TOTAL paid a signing  
bonus of 3,000 million Brazilian Real (approximately  
39.2%. Suncor, as operator, held 40.8%. TOTAL also acquired  
a 49% stake in the Suncor-operated Voyageur upgrader project.  
For those two acquisitions, the Group paid 1,937 million  
$1,301 million).  
(
CAD 2,666 million) mainly representing the value of intangible  
assets for 474 million and the value of tangible assets for  
1,550 million.  
Refining & Chemicals  
TOTAL finalized in June 2013 the sale of its fertilizing businesses  
in Europe.  
Furthermore, TOTAL sold to Suncor 36.75% interest in the  
Joslyn project for 612 million (CAD 842 million). The Group,  
as operator, retained a 38.25% interest in the project.  
Information relating to sales in progress is presented in accordance  
with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued  
operations” in note 34.  
– TOTAL finalized in April 2011 the sale of its 75.8% interest in its  
Upstream Cameroonian affiliate Total E&P Cameroun to Perenco,  
for an amount of 172 million ($247 million), net of cash sold.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
249  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
TOTAL and the Russian company Novatek signed in March 2011  
two Memorandums of Cooperation to develop the cooperation  
between TOTAL on one side, and Novatek and its main  
shareholders on the other side.  
500 million ($696 million) in cash for the acquisition of these  
assets. TOTAL will also be committed to pay additional amounts  
up to $1.63 billion over a maximum period of 7 years in the form  
of a 60% carry of Chesapeake and EnerVest’s future capital  
expenditures on drilling and completion of wells within the Joint  
Venture. Furthermore, TOTAL will also acquire a 25% share in  
any new acreage which will be acquired by Chesapeake in the  
liquids-rich area of the Utica shale play.  
This cooperation was developed around the two following axes:  
-
In April 2011, TOTAL took a 12.09% shareholding in Novatek  
for an amount of 2,901 million ($4,108 million). In  
December 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of an  
additional 2% interest in Novatek for an amount of 596 million  
Refining & Chemicals  
(
$796 million), which increased TOTAL’s overall interest in  
– TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of its photocure  
and coatings resins businesses to Arkema for an amount  
of 520 million, net of cash sold.  
Novatek to 14.09%. TOTAL considered that it had a significant  
influence especially through its representation on the Board of  
Directors of Novatek and its participation in the major Yamal  
LNG project. Therefore, the interest in Novatek has been  
accounted for by the· equity method since the second  
quarter of 2011.  
In October 2011, TOTAL finalized the acquisition of a 20%  
interest in the Yamal LNG project and became Novatek’s  
partner in this project.  
TOTAL and International Petroleum Investment Company  
a company wholly-owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi)  
(
entered into an agreement on February 15, 2011 for the sale,  
to International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC), of the  
-
48.83% equity interest held by TOTAL in the share capital of  
CEPSA, to be completed within the framework of a public tender  
offer being launched by IPIC for all the CEPSA shares not yet  
held by IPIC, at a unit purchase price of 28 per CEPSA share.  
TOTAL sold to IPIC all of its equity interest in CEPSA and  
received, as of July 29, 2011, an amount of 3,659 million.  
TOTAL finalized in July 2011 the sale of 10% of its interest in  
the Colombian pipeline OCENSA. The Group still held a 5.2%  
interest in this asset.  
TOTAL finalized in September 2011 the acquisition of Esso  
Italiana’s interests respectively in the Gorgoglione concession  
• Marketing & Services  
TOTAL finalized in October 2011 the sale of most of its Marketing  
assets in the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of  
Man, to Rontec Investments LLP, a consortium led by Snax 24,  
one of the leading independent forecourt operators in the United  
Kingdom, for an amount of 424 million (£368 million).  
(25% interest), which contains the Tempa Rossa field, and in two  
exploration licenses located in the same area (51.7% for each  
one). The acquisition increased TOTAL’s interest in the operated  
Tempa Rossa field to 75%.  
TOTAL finalized in December 2011 the sale to Silex Gas Norway  
AS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allianz, of its entire stake in  
Gassled (6.4%) and related entities for an amount of 477 million  
After the all-cash tender of $23.25 per share launched on  
April 28, 2011 and completed on June 21, 2011, TOTAL  
acquired a 60% stake in SunPower Corp., a U.S. company listed  
on NASDAQ with headquarters in San Jose (California). Shares  
of SunPower Corp. continue to be traded on the NASDAQ.  
(NOK 3.7 billion).  
Total E&P USA Inc. signed in December 2011 an agreement to  
enter into a Joint Venture with Chesapeake Exploration L.L.C.,  
a subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and its partner  
EnerVest Ltd. Under the terms of this agreement, TOTAL acquired  
a 25% share in Chesapeake’s and EnerVest’s liquids-rich area of  
the Utica shale play. TOTAL paid to Chesapeake and EnerVest  
The acquisition cost, whose cash payment occurred  
on June 21, 2011, amounted to 974 million ($1,394 million).  
The goodwill amounted to $533 million and was fully depreciated  
st  
on 31 December, 2011.  
4) Business segment information  
Financial information by business segment is reported in accordance  
with the internal reporting system and shows internal segment  
information that is used to manage and measure the performance  
of TOTAL and which is reviewed by the main operational decision-  
making body of the Group, namely the Executive Committee.  
The Group’s activities are divided into three business segments  
as follows:  
an Upstream segment including, alongside the activities of the  
Exploration & Production of hydrocarbons, the activities of  
Gas & Power;  
The operational profit and assets are broken down by business  
segment prior to the consolidation and inter-segment adjustments.  
a Refining & Chemicals segment constituting a major industrial  
hub comprising the activitites of refining, Petrochemicals,  
fertilizers and speciality Chemicals. This segment also includes  
the activitites of oil Trading & Shipping; and  
Sales prices between business segments approximate market prices.  
a Marketing & Services segment including the global activitites  
of supply and marketing in the field of petroleum products as well  
as the activity of New Energies.  
In addition the Corporate segment includes holdings operating  
and financial activities.  
250  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
A) Information by business segment  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
19,855  
28,349  
-
86,204  
39,360  
(3,625)  
83,481  
1,626  
(14,262)  
2
133  
-
-
(69,468)  
-
189,542  
-
(17,887)  
Revenues from sales  
48,204  
121,939  
70,845  
135  
(69,468)  
171,655  
Operating expenses  
(24,002)  
(120,500)  
(68,802)  
(597)  
69,468 (144,433)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(7,141)  
(1,307)  
(552)  
(31)  
-
(9,031)  
Operating income  
17,061  
132  
1,491  
(493)  
-
-
-
18,191  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
2,027  
(10,321)  
143  
(460)  
39  
(413)  
(23)  
(21)  
-
-
2,186  
(11,215)  
Net operating income  
8,767  
(185)  
1,117  
(537)  
9,162  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(501)  
(221)  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
8,440  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
(
Upstream  
Refining &  
Chemicals & Services  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
adjustments)(a)  
(M)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
(56)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(56)  
-
-
Revenues from sales  
(56)  
-
-
-
-
(56)  
Operating expenses  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(86)  
(1,059)  
(102)  
-
-
-
-
(1,247)  
(651)  
(138)  
(3)  
(792)  
Operating income(b)  
(793)  
(1,197)  
(105)  
-
-
-
-
(2,095)  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
(218)  
408  
(199)  
(193)  
2
69  
(30)  
(34)  
-
-
(445)  
250  
Net operating income(b)  
(603)  
(1,589)  
(34)  
(64)  
(2,290)  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(15)  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
(2,305)  
(
(
a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
b) Of which inventory valuation effect  
-
-
on operating income  
on net operating income  
-
-
(737)  
(495)  
(65)  
(47)  
-
-
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
251  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(
(
adjusted)  
Chemicals & Services  
M)(a)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
19,911  
28,349  
-
86,204  
39,360  
(3,625)  
83,481  
1,626  
(14,262)  
2
133  
-
-
(69,468)  
-
189,598  
-
(17,887)  
Revenues from sales  
48,260  
121,939  
70,845  
135  
(69,468)  
171,711  
Operating expenses  
(23,916)  
(119,441)  
(68,700)  
(597)  
69,468 (143,186)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(6,490)  
(1,169)  
(549)  
(31)  
-
(8,239)  
Adjusted operating income  
17,854  
1,329  
1,596  
(493)  
-
-
20,286  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
2,245  
(10,729)  
342  
(267)  
37  
(482)  
7
13  
-
-
2,631  
(11,465)  
Adjusted net operating income  
9,370  
1,404  
1,151  
(473)  
11,452  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(501)  
(206)  
Adjusted net income  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10,745  
4.73  
Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()  
(a) Except for earnings per share.  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Total expenditures  
Total divestments  
Cash flow from operating activities  
22,396  
4,353  
16,457  
2,039  
275  
3,211  
1,365  
141  
1,926  
122  
45  
(121)  
-
-
-
25,922  
4,814  
21,473  
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2013  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Investments & loans in equity affiliates  
Other non-current assets  
Working capital  
Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale  
75,169  
11,499  
4,125  
(237)  
(22,894)  
1,603  
8,998  
2,568  
1,045  
7,545  
(3,216)  
-
4,671  
737  
1,475  
2,692  
(1,669)  
-
262  
-
567  
(1,974)  
(936)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
89,100  
14,804  
7,212  
8,026  
(28,715)  
1,603  
Capital Employed (balance sheet)  
Less inventory valuation effect  
69,265  
-
16,940  
(2,643)  
14,297  
9%  
7,906  
(647)  
7,259  
16%  
(2,081)  
(2)  
-
92,030  
(3,292)  
88,738  
13%  
-
Capital Employed (Business segment information)  
ROACE as a percentage  
69,265  
14%  
(2,083)  
-
-
-
252  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
22,143  
31,521  
-
91,117  
44,470  
(3,593)  
86,614  
755  
(14,169)  
187  
199  
-
-
(76,945)  
-
200,061  
-
(17,762)  
Revenues from sales  
53,664  
131,994  
73,200  
386  
(76,945)  
182,299  
Operating expenses  
(25,966)  
(129,499)  
(71,535)  
(973)  
76,945 (151,028)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(7,437)  
(1,445)  
(607)  
(36)  
-
(9,525)  
Operating income  
20,261  
1,050  
1,058  
(623)  
-
-
-
21,746  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
2,325  
(12,359)  
213  
(263)  
(198)  
(380)  
276  
(127)  
-
-
2,616  
(13,129)  
Net operating income  
10,227  
1,000  
480  
(474)  
11,233  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(477)  
(147)  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
10,609  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
(
Upstream  
Refining &  
Chemicals & Services  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
adjustments)(a)  
(M)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
(9)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(9)  
-
-
Revenues from sales  
(9)  
-
-
-
-
(9)  
Operating expenses  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(586)  
(199)  
(229)  
(88)  
-
-
(1,102)  
(1,200)  
(206)  
(68)  
-
(1,474)  
Operating income(b)  
(1,795)  
(405)  
(297)  
(88)  
-
-
-
(2,585)  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
240  
637  
(41)  
70  
(119)  
66  
146  
(108)  
-
-
226  
665  
Net operating income(b)  
(918)  
(376)  
(350)  
(50)  
(1,694)  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
(1,667)  
(
(
a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
b) Of which inventory valuation effect  
-
-
on operating income  
on net operating income  
-
-
(179)  
(116)  
(55)  
(39)  
-
-
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
253  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(
(
adjusted)  
Chemicals & Services  
M)(a)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
22,152  
31,521  
-
91,117  
44,470  
(3,593)  
86,614  
755  
(14,169)  
187  
199  
-
-
(76,945)  
-
200,070  
-
(17,762)  
Revenues from sales  
53,673  
131,994  
73,200  
386  
(76,945)  
182,308  
Operating expenses  
(25,380)  
(129,300)  
(71,306)  
(885)  
76,945 (149,926)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(6,237)  
(1,239)  
(539)  
(36)  
-
(8,051)  
Adjusted operating income  
22,056  
1,455  
1,355  
(535)  
-
-
24,331  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
2,085  
(12,996)  
254  
(333)  
(79)  
(446)  
130  
(19)  
-
-
2,390  
(13,794)  
Adjusted net operating income  
11,145  
1,376  
830  
(424)  
12,927  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(477)  
(174)  
Adjusted net income  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,276  
5.42  
Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()  
(a) Except for earnings per share.  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Total expenditures  
Total divestments  
Cash flow from operating activities  
19,618  
2,798  
18,950  
1,944  
304  
2,127  
1,301  
152  
1,132  
80  
2,617  
253  
-
-
-
22,943  
5,871  
22,462  
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2012  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Investments & loans in equity affiliates  
Other non-current assets  
Working capital  
Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale  
68,310  
11,080  
3,226  
(329)  
(21,492)  
3,067  
9,220  
1,971  
1,194  
9,623  
(3,046)  
-
4,433  
708  
1,293  
2,821  
(1,627)  
-
227  
-
419  
-
-
-
-
-
-
82,190  
13,759  
6,132  
10,343  
(27,461)  
3,067  
(1,772)  
(1,296)  
-
Capital Employed (balance sheet)  
Less inventory valuation effect  
63,862  
-
18,962  
(3,236)  
15,726  
9%  
7,628  
(642)  
6,986  
12%  
(2,422)  
-
88,030  
(3,878)  
84,152  
16%  
-
(2,422)  
-
-
Capital Employed (Business segment information)  
ROACE as a percentage  
63,862  
18%  
-
-
254  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
22,211  
27,301  
-
77,146  
44,277  
(2,362)  
85,325  
805  
(15,781)  
11  
185  
-
-
(72,568)  
-
184,693  
-
(18,143)  
Revenues from sales  
49,512  
119,061  
70,349  
196  
(72,568)  
166,550  
Operating expenses  
(21,855)  
(116,369)  
(68,384)  
(663)  
72,568 (134,703)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(5,039)  
(1,936)  
(496)  
(35)  
-
(7,506)  
Operating income  
22,618  
756  
1,469  
(502)  
-
-
-
24,341  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
2,198  
(13,576)  
647  
(138)  
(377)  
(441)  
336  
(41)  
-
-
2,804  
(14,196)  
Net operating income  
11,240  
1,265  
651  
(207)  
12,949  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(335)  
(305)  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
12,309  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
(
Upstream  
Refining &  
Chemicals & Services  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
adjustments)(a)  
(M)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
45  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
45  
-
-
Revenues from sales  
45  
-
-
-
-
45  
Operating expenses  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
-
852  
271  
-
-
-
-
1 123  
(75)  
(705)  
(1)  
(781)  
Operating income(b)  
(30)  
147  
270  
-
-
-
-
387  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
682  
(43)  
337  
(61)  
(363)  
(78)  
90  
(80)  
-
-
746  
(262)  
Net operating income(b)  
609  
423  
(171)  
10  
871  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(19)  
Net income  
-
-
-
-
852  
(
(
a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
b) Of which inventory valuation effect  
-
-
on operating income  
on net operating income  
-
-
928  
669  
287  
200  
-
-
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
255  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(
(
adjusted)  
Chemicals & Services  
M)(a)  
Non-Group sales  
Intersegment sales  
Excise taxes  
22,166  
27,301  
-
77,146  
44,277  
(2,362)  
85,325  
805  
(15,781)  
11  
185  
-
-
(72,568)  
-
184,648  
-
(18,143)  
Revenues from sales  
49,467  
119,061  
70,349  
196  
(72,568)  
166,505  
Operating expenses  
(21,855)  
(117,221)  
(68,655)  
(663)  
72,568 (135,826)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
of tangible assets and mineral interests  
(4,964)  
(1,231)  
(495)  
(35)  
-
(6,725)  
Adjusted operating income  
22,648  
609  
1,199  
(502)  
-
-
23,954  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates and other items  
Tax on net operating income  
1,516  
(13,533)  
310  
(77)  
(14)  
(363)  
246  
39  
-
-
2,058  
(13,934)  
Adjusted net operating income  
10,631  
842  
822  
(217)  
12,078  
Net cost of net debt  
Non-controlling interests  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(335)  
(286)  
Adjusted net income  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,457  
5.08  
Adjusted fully-diluted earnings per share ()  
(a) Except for earnings per share.  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Upstream  
Refining &  
Marketing  
Corporate Intercompany  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals & Services  
Total expenditures  
Total divestments  
Cash flow from operating activities  
20,662  
2,591  
17,044  
1,910  
2,509  
2,146  
1,834  
1,955  
541  
135  
1,523  
(195)  
-
-
-
24,541  
8,578  
19,536  
Balance sheets as of December 31, 2011  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Investments & loans in equity affiliates  
Other non-current assets  
Working capital  
Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale  
63,250  
10,581  
2,446  
699  
(20,064)  
-
9,037  
1,658  
1,492  
9,851  
(3,220)  
-
4,338  
756  
1,188  
2,902  
(1,664)  
-
245  
-
3,075  
(1,374)  
(1,201)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
76,870  
12,995  
8,201  
12,078  
(26,149)  
-
Capital Employed (balance sheet)  
Less inventory valuation effect  
56,912  
-
18,818  
(3 367)  
15,451  
5%  
7,520  
(667)  
6,853  
13%  
745  
13  
758  
-
-
83,995  
(4 021  
79,974  
16%  
-
Capital Employed (Business segment information)  
ROACE as a percentage  
56,912  
21%  
-
-
256  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
B) ROE (Return on Equity)  
The Group evaluates the return on equity as the ratio of adjusted consolidated net income to average adjusted shareholders’ equity between  
the beginning and the end of the period. Thus, adjusted shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2013 is calculated after  
payment of a dividend of 2.38 per share, subject to approval by the shareholders’ meeting on May 16, 2014.  
The ROE is calculated as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Adjusted net income - Group share  
Adjusted non-controlling interests  
10,745  
206  
12,276  
174  
11,457  
286  
Adjusted consolidated net income  
10,951  
12,450  
11,743  
Shareholders’ equity - Group share  
Distribution of the income based on existing shares at the closing date  
Non-controlling interests  
72,629  
(1,362)  
2,281  
71,185  
(1,299)  
1,280  
66,945  
(1,255)  
1,352  
Adjusted shareholders’ equity(a)  
ROE  
73,548  
15%  
71,166  
18%  
67,042  
19%  
(a) Adjusted shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2010 amounted to 57,951 million.  
C) Reconciliation of the information by business segment with Consolidated Financial Statements  
The table below presents the impact of adjustment items on the consolidated statement of income:  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Adjusted Adjustments(a)  
Consolidated  
statement  
(M)  
of income  
Sales  
Excise taxes  
Revenues from sales  
189,598  
(17,887)  
171,711  
(56)  
-
(56)  
189,542  
(17,887)  
171,655  
Purchases net of inventory variation  
Other operating expenses  
Exploration costs  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests  
Other income  
Other expense  
(120,311)  
(21,242)  
(1,633)  
(8,239)  
468  
(802)  
(445)  
-
(792)  
1,257  
(1,687)  
(121,113)  
(21,687)  
(1,633)  
(9,031)  
1,725  
(418)  
(2,105)  
Financial interest on debt  
Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents  
Cost of net debt  
(670)  
64  
(606)  
-
-
-
(670)  
64  
(606)  
Other financial income  
Other financial expense  
524  
(529)  
-
-
524  
(529)  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates  
Income taxes  
2,586  
(11,360)  
10,951  
(15)  
250  
2,571  
(11,110)  
8,661  
Consolidated net income  
(2,290)  
Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
10,745  
206  
(2,305)  
15  
8,440  
221  
(a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
257  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Adjusted Adjustments(a)  
Consolidated  
statement  
(M)  
of income  
Sales  
Excise taxes  
Revenues from sales  
200,070  
(17,762)  
182,308  
(9)  
-
(9)  
200,061  
(17,762)  
182,299  
Purchases net of inventory variation  
Other operating expenses  
Exploration costs  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests  
Other income  
Other expense  
(126,564)  
(21,916)  
(1,446)  
(8,051)  
681  
(234)  
(868)  
-
(1,474)  
781  
(126,798)  
(22,784)  
(1,446)  
(9,525)  
1,462  
(448)  
(467)  
(915)  
Financial interest on debt  
Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents  
Cost of net debt  
(671)  
100  
(571)  
-
-
-
(671)  
100  
(571)  
Other financial income  
Other financial expense  
558  
(499)  
-
-
558  
(499)  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates  
Income taxes  
2,098  
(13,700)  
12,450  
(88)  
665  
2,010  
(13,035)  
10,756  
Consolidated net income  
(1,694)  
Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
12,276  
174  
(1,667)  
(27)  
10,609  
147  
(a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Adjusted Adjustments(a)  
Consolidated  
statement  
(M)  
of income  
Sales  
Excise taxes  
Revenues from sales  
184,648  
(18,143)  
166,505  
45  
-
45  
184,693  
(18,143)  
166,550  
Purchases net of inventory variation  
Other operating expenses  
Exploration costs  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible assets and mineral interests  
Other income  
(115,107)  
(19,700)  
(1,019)  
(6,725)  
430  
1,215  
(92)  
(113,892)  
(19,792)  
(1,019)  
(7,506)  
1,946  
-
(781)  
1,516  
Other expense  
Financial interest on debt  
Financial income from marketable securities & cash equivalents  
Cost of net debt  
(536)  
(713)  
273  
(711)  
(1,247)  
(713)  
273  
-
-
-
(440)  
(440)  
Other financial income  
609  
(429)  
-
-
609  
(429)  
Other financial expense  
Equity in net income (loss) of affiliates  
Income taxes  
1,984  
(59)  
(262)  
871  
1,925  
(13,829)  
11,743  
(14,091)  
12,614  
Consolidated net income  
Group share  
Non-controlling interests  
11,457  
286  
852  
19  
12,309  
305  
(a) Adjustments include special items, inventory valuation effect and the effect of changes in fair value.  
258  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
D) Adjustment items by business segment  
The adjustment items for income as per Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements are detailed as follows:  
Adjustments to operating income  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Other items  
-
(56)  
-
(651)  
(86)  
(737)  
-
(281)  
(138)  
(41)  
(65)  
-
(3)  
(3)  
(34)  
-
-
-
-
-
(802)  
(56)  
(284)  
(792)  
(161)  
Total  
(793)  
(1,197)  
(105)  
-
(2,095)  
Adjustments to net income, Group share  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Gains (losses) on disposals of assets  
Other items  
-
(44)  
-
(442)  
(31)  
(86)  
(495)  
-
(405)  
(137)  
(41)  
(54)  
-
(23)  
(7)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
(549)  
(44)  
(428)  
(586)  
(72)  
(511)  
35  
(64)  
(626)  
Total  
(603)  
(1,589)  
(49)  
(64)  
(2,305)  
Adjustments to operating income  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Other items  
-
(9)  
-
(179)  
-
(2)  
(206)  
(18)  
(55)  
-
-
(68)  
(174)  
-
-
-
(234)  
(9)  
(2)  
(1,474)  
(866)  
(1,200)  
(586)  
-
(88)  
Total  
(1,795)  
(405)  
(297)  
(88)  
(2,585)  
Total  
Adjustments to net income, Group share  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Gains (losses) on disposals of assets  
Other items  
-
(7)  
-
(769)  
240  
(382)  
(116)  
-
(24)  
(192)  
-
(41)  
-
(53)  
(121)  
-
-
-
-
(157)  
(7)  
(77)  
(1,112)  
581  
(895)  
(30)  
341  
(361)  
(44)  
(108)  
Total  
(918)  
(376)  
(323)  
(50)  
(1,667)  
Adjustments to operating income  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Other items  
-
45  
-
(75)  
-
928  
-
287  
-
-
-
-
-
1,215  
45  
-
-
-
-
-
(706)  
(75)  
(781)  
(92)  
(17)  
Total  
(30)  
147  
270  
-
387  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
259  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Adjustments to net income, Group share  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Upstream  
Refining & Marketing &  
Corporate  
Total  
(M)  
Chemicals  
Services  
Inventory valuation effect  
Effect of changes in fair value  
Restructuring charges  
Asset impairment charges  
Gains (losses) on disposals of assets  
Other items  
-
32  
-
(75)  
843  
(178)  
669  
-
(72)  
(476)  
415  
(113)  
165  
-
(50)  
(463)  
206  
(61)  
-
-
-
834  
32  
(122)  
(1,014)  
1,538  
(416)  
-
74  
(64)  
Total  
622  
423  
(203)  
10  
852  
E) Additional information on impairments  
A +10% variation in the price of hydrocarbons in identical operating  
conditions would have a positive impact in operating income of  
In the Upstream, Refining & Chemicals, Marketing & Services and  
Holdings segments, impairments of assets have been recognized  
for the year ended December 31, 2013, with an impact of  
195 million and 126 million in net income, Group share.  
A variation of (1)% in the discount rate would have a positive impact  
in operating income of 47 million and 30 million in net income,  
Group share. For these assets and certain assets where the value  
in use is close to the net book value, opposite variations in the  
above assumptions would have respective impacts in operating  
income of (1,185) million and (619) million, and of (822) million  
and (431) million in net income, Group share.  
792 million in operating income and 586 million in net income,  
Group share. These impairments have been disclosed as  
adjustments to operating income and adjustments to net income,  
Group share. These items are identified in paragraph 4D above as  
adjustment items with the heading “Asset impairment charges”.  
The impairment losses impact certain Cash Generating Units (CGU)  
for which there were indications of impairment, due mainly to  
changes in the operating conditions or the economic environment  
of their specific businesses.  
The additional impairments that could be recorded in the case of  
unfavourable evolutions of the price of hydrocarbons or discount  
rates concern mainly shale gas assets in the Barnett basin of the  
United States and assets in Australia and Kazakhstan.  
The principles applied are the following:  
The CGUs for the Refining & Chemicals segment are defined by  
the legal entities having the operating activities for the refining and  
petrochemical activities. The CGUs for the other activities of the  
sector are global divisions, each division grouping together a set of  
businesses or homogeneous products for strategic, commercial  
and industrial plans. For the year 2013 the Group recorded  
impairments of 138 million in operating profit and 137 million in  
net income, Group share, mainly linked to the project to adapt the  
Carling platform in France. In addition, in the context of persistent  
volatility of European refining margins, the Group did not change  
impairments on CGUs for refining in France and the United Kingdom.  
A +5% variation in gross margin under identical operating conditions  
or a (1)% or a +1% variation in the discount rate would not impact  
operating income or net income, Group share. An opposite variation in  
gross margin projections would have an impact in operating income  
of (31) million and (22) million in net income, Group share. This  
additional impairment in the case of unfavourable gross margin  
concerns mainly the Composites activity.  
the recoverable amount of CGU’s has been based on their value  
in use, as defined in Note 1 paragraph L to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements “Impairment of long-lived assets”;  
the future cash flows have been determined with the assumptions  
in the long-term plan of the Group. These assumptions (including  
future prices of products, supply and demand for products,  
future production volumes) represent the best estimate by  
management of the Group of all economic conditions during the  
remaining life of assets;  
the future cash flows, based on the long-term plan, are prepared  
over a period consistent with the life of the assets within the CGU.  
They are prepared post-tax and include specific risks attached  
to CGU assets. They are discounted using an 8% post-tax  
discount rate, this rate being a weighted-average capital cost  
estimated from historical market data. This rate has been applied  
consistently for the years ending in 2011, 2012 and 2013;  
the value in use calculated by discounting the above post-tax  
cash flows using an 8% post-tax discount rate is not materially  
different from value in use calculated by discounting pre-tax cash  
flows using a pre-tax discount rate determined by an iterative  
computation from the post-tax value in use. These pre-tax  
discount rates are in a range from 8% to 12% in 2013.  
The CGUs of Marketing & Services are subsidiaries or groups  
of subsidiaries organised by relevant geographical zone. For the  
year 2013 the Group recorded impairments on CGUs of the  
Marketing & Services segment of 3 million in operating profit and  
7 million in net income, Group share. Different scenarios of  
sensitivity (gross margin, discount rate, and solar unit sales prices)  
would not lead to additional impairments on CGUs of this segment.  
For the year ended December 31, 2013 impairments of assets have  
been recognized in respect of CGUs of the Upstream segment with  
an impact of 651 million in operating income and 442 million in  
net income, Group share. These impairments mainly concern shale  
gas assets in the Barnett basin of the United States due to the  
persistent weakness of gas prices in the American market  
For the year ended December 31, 2012, impairments of assets  
have been recognized in the Upstream, Refining & Chemicals,  
Marketing & Services and Holding segments with an impact of  
1,474 million in operating income and 1,112 million in net  
income, Group share. These impairments have been disclosed as  
adjustments to operating income and adjustments to net income,  
Group share.  
(Henry Hub). They also include impairments of the Group’s assets  
in Syria due to a permanent degradation of the security context.  
260  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
For the year ended December 31, 2011, impairments of assets  
have been recognized in the Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and  
Marketing & Services segments with an impact of 781 million in  
operating income and 1,014 million in net income, Group share.  
These impairments have been disclosed as adjustments to  
operating income and adjustments to net income, Group share.  
No reversal of impairment has been recognized for the years ended  
December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.  
5) Information by geographical area  
(M)  
France  
Rest  
North  
Africa  
Rest of  
Total  
of Europe  
America  
the world  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
Non-Group sales  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Capital expenditures  
43,412  
4,533  
1,335  
96,876  
19,463  
4,736  
16,815  
14,204  
3,130  
17,428  
27,444  
8,060  
15,011  
23,456  
8,661  
189,542  
89,100  
25,922  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
Non-Group sales  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Capital expenditures  
45,981  
4,560  
1,589  
103,862  
17,697  
4,406  
17,648  
15,220  
3,148  
17,921  
24,999  
7,274  
14,649  
19,714  
6,526  
200,061  
82,190  
22,943  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
Non-Group sales  
Property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, net  
Capital expenditures  
42,626  
5,637  
1,530  
81,453  
15,576  
3,802  
15,917  
14,518  
5,245  
15,077  
23,546  
5,264  
29,620  
17,593  
8,700  
184,693  
76,870  
24,541  
6) Operating expenses  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Purchases, net of inventory variation(a) (b)  
Exploration costs  
(121,113)  
(1,633)  
(21,687)  
138  
(126,798)  
(1,446)  
(22,784)  
436  
(113,892)  
(1,019)  
(19,792)  
666  
Other operating expenses(c)  
of which non-current operating liabilities (allowances) reversals  
of which current operating liabilities (allowances) reversals  
4
(51)  
(150)  
Operating expenses  
(144,433)  
(151,028)  
(134,703)  
(
(
(
a) Includes taxes paid on oil and gas production in the Upstream segment, namely royalties.  
b) The Group values under/overliftings at market value.  
c) Principally composed of production and administrative costs (see in particular the payroll costs as detailed in Note 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements “Payroll and staff”).  
Also includes for 2012 an amount of 176 million for the exceptional contribution of 4% on the value of the oil stocks established by the second corrective finance act for 2012 in  
France.This exceptional contribution is due by every person, with the exception of the state, owning volumes of certain types of petroleum products situated in the territory of  
metropolitan France.  
7) Other income and other expense  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Gains on disposal of assets  
Foreign exchange gains  
Other  
1,501  
6
218  
1,321  
26  
115  
1,650  
118  
178  
Other income  
1,725  
1,462  
1,946  
Losses on disposal of assets  
Foreign exchange losses  
(1,433)  
-
-
-
-
-
Amortization of other intangible assets (excl. mineral interests)  
Other  
(219)  
(453)  
(250)  
(665)  
(592)  
(655)  
Other expense  
(2,105)  
(915)  
(1,247)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
261  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Other income  
Other expense  
In 2013, gains on disposals were mainly related to the sale  
of Transport et Infrastructures Gaz France (TIGF) and the sales  
of interests in the Upstream segment: 25% interest in the  
Tempa Rossa field in Italy and all interests in Trinidad & Tobago  
In 2013, the loss on disposals is mainly related to the sale  
to Suncor Energy Inc. of TOTAL’s 49% interest in the Voyageur  
upgrader project in Canada (see Note 3 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements). The heading “Other” mainly consists  
of 212 million of restructuring charges in the Upstream,  
Refining & Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments.  
(see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2012, gains and losses on disposal of assets were mainly related  
to the sale of the interest in Sanofi and to the sale of assets in the  
Upstream segment (sales in Colombia (see Note 3 to the  
In 2012, the heading “Other” was mainly comprised of a provision  
for the amount of $398 million in relation to a transaction in  
progress with the United States Securities and Exchange  
Commission (SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the  
United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements).  
Consolidated Financial Statements), Great Britain and Nigeria).  
In 2011, gains and losses on disposal of assets were mainly related  
to the sale of the interest in CEPSA, to the sale of assets in the  
Upstream segment (especially the sale of 10% Group’s interest  
in the Colombian pipeline OCENSA) and to the sale of photocure  
and coatings resins businesses (see Note 3 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements).  
In 2011, the heading “Other” was mainly comprised of 243 million  
of restructuring charges in the Upstream, Refining & Chemicals and  
Marketing & Services segments.  
8) Other financial income and expense  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Dividend income on non-consolidated subsidiaries  
Capitalized financial expenses  
Other  
152  
259  
113  
223  
248  
87  
330  
171  
108  
Other financial income  
524  
558  
609  
Accretion of asset retirement obligations  
Other  
(439)  
(90)  
(405)  
(94)  
(344)  
(85)  
Other financial expense  
(529)  
(499)  
(429)  
9) Income taxes  
TOTAL S.A. is taxed in accordance with the common French tax  
regime.  
In addition, no deferred tax is recognized for the temporary  
differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of  
investments in foreign subsidiaries which are considered to be  
permanent investments. Undistributed earnings from foreign  
Since August 2012, an additional tax to corporate income tax of  
3% is due on dividends distributed by French companies or foreign  
subsidiaries considered to be reinvested indefinitely amounted to  
31,097 million as of December 31, 2013. The determination  
organizations subject to corporate income tax in France. This tax is  
liable on amounts distributed, the payment of which was due from  
of the tax effect relating to such reinvested income is not practicable.  
th  
August 17 , 2012, the effective date of the law.  
No deferred tax is recognized on unremitted earnings (approximately  
The impact of this additional tax for the Group is a charge of  
28,195 million) of the Group’s French subsidiaries since the  
161 million in 2013 and of 120 million in 2012. This additional  
remittance of such earnings would be tax exempt for the subsidiaries  
in which the Company owns 95% or more of the outstanding shares.  
tax is not tax deductible.  
Income taxes are detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Current income taxes  
Deferred income taxes  
(10,246)  
(864)  
(12,430)  
(605)  
(12,495)  
(1,596)  
Total income taxes  
(11,110)  
(13,035)  
(14,091)  
262  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Before netting deferred tax assets and liabilities by fiscal entity, the components of deferred tax balances are as follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Net operating losses and tax carry forwards  
Employee benefits  
Other temporary non-deductible provisions  
3,325  
1,190  
4,373  
2,247  
1,583  
3,816  
1,584  
1,329  
3,521  
Gross deferred tax assets  
8,888  
7,646  
6,434  
Valuation allowance  
(1,462)  
(719)  
(667)  
Net deferred tax assets  
7,426  
6,927  
5,767  
Excess tax over book depreciation  
Other temporary tax deductions  
(15,190)  
(2,369)  
(14,083)  
(2,697)  
(12,831)  
(2,721)  
Gross deferred tax liability  
Net deferred tax liability  
(17,559)  
(10,133)  
(16,780)  
(9,853)  
(15,552)  
(9,785)  
Carried forward tax losses on net operating losses in the table above for 3,325 million as of December 31, 2013, includes notably Belgium  
for 575 million, France for 567 million and the United States for 476 million.  
The impairment of deferred tax assets in the table above for 1,426 million as of December 31, 2013, relates notably to France for an amount  
of 365 million and to Belgium for an amount of 337 million.  
After netting deferred tax assets and liabilities by fiscal entity, deferred taxes are presented on the balance sheet as follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Deferred tax assets, non-current  
Deferred tax liabilities, non-current  
2,810  
(12,943)  
2,279  
(12,132)  
2,070  
(11,855)  
Net amount  
(10,133)  
(9,853)  
(9,785)  
The net deferred tax variation in the balance sheet is analyzed as follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Opening balance  
(9,853)  
(9,785)  
(7,921)  
Deferred tax on income  
(864)  
(263)  
113  
(605)  
425  
69  
(1,596)  
136  
(17)  
(387)  
Deferred tax on shareholders’ equity(a)  
Changes in scope of consolidation(b)  
Currency translation adjustment  
734  
43  
Closing balance  
(10,133)  
(9,853)  
(9,785)  
(
a) This amount includes mainly deferred taxes on actuarial gains and losses current income taxes and deferred taxes for changes in fair value of listed securities classified as financial assets  
available for sale, as well as deferred taxes related to cash flow hedges (see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
b) Changes in scope of consolidation include, as of December 31, 2013, the impact of reclassifications in assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as  
held for sale for 219 million.  
(
Reconciliation between provision for income taxes and pre-tax income:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Consolidated net income  
Provision for income taxes  
8,661  
11,110  
10,756  
13,035  
12,614  
14,091  
Pre-tax income  
19,771  
38.00%  
(7,513)  
23,791  
36.10%  
(8,589)  
26,705  
36.10%  
(9,641)  
French statutory tax rate  
Theoretical tax charge  
Difference between French and foreign income tax rates  
Tax effect of equity in income (loss) of affiliates  
Permanent differences  
Adjustments on prior years income taxes  
Adjustments on deferred tax related to changes in tax rates  
Changes in valuation allowance of deferred tax assets  
Other  
(4,616)  
(5,944)  
726  
811  
82  
(5,739)  
695  
889  
(19)  
(201)  
(71)  
977  
852  
-
2
(812)  
-
(69)  
(52)  
-
(4)  
Net provision for income taxes  
(11,110)  
(13,035)  
(14,091)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
263  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
The difference between the French tax rate and the tax rates of foreign subsidiaries is mainly due to the taxation of profits made by  
the Group in countries where it conducts its exploration and production activities at higher tax rates than French tax rates.  
The French statutory tax rate includes the standard corporate tax rate (33.33%) and additional applicable taxes that bring the overall tax rate  
to 38.00% in 2013 (versus 36.10% in 2012 and 2011).  
Permanent differences are mainly due to impairment of goodwill and to dividends from non-consolidated companies as well as the specific  
taxation rules applicable to certain activities.  
Net operating losses and carried forward tax credits  
Deferred tax assets related to carried forward tax credits on net operating losses expire in the following years:  
As of December 31,  
2013  
Tax  
2012  
Tax  
2011  
Tax  
(M)  
Basis  
Basis  
Basis  
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
012  
013  
014  
015  
016(a)  
017(b)  
018 and after  
-
-
-
-
-
316  
249  
167  
26  
3,187  
-
3,049  
-
150  
116  
75  
8
971  
-
242  
171  
104  
8
2,095  
-
115  
81  
47  
2
688  
-
356  
270  
164  
410  
3,216  
5,506  
171  
129  
76  
134  
966  
1,849  
-
-
Unlimited  
927  
2,119  
651  
Total  
9,922  
3,325  
6,994  
2,247  
4,739  
1,584  
(
(
a) Net operating losses and carried forward tax credits in 2016 and after for 2011.  
b) Net operating losses and carried forward tax credits in 2017 and after for 2012.  
10) Intangible assets  
As of December 31, 2013  
Cost  
Amortization  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Goodwill  
1,845  
8,926  
7,563  
3,609  
(937)  
(3,628)  
(1,295)  
(2,742)  
908  
5,298  
6,268  
867  
Proved mineral interests  
Unproved mineral interests  
Other intangible assets  
Total intangible assets  
21,943  
(8,602)  
13,341  
As of December 31, 2012  
Cost  
Amortization  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Goodwill  
1,852  
8,803  
6,416  
3,571  
(963)  
(3,291)  
(913)  
889  
5,512  
5,503  
954  
Proved mineral interests  
Unproved mineral interests  
Other intangible assets  
(2,617)  
Total intangible assets  
20,642  
(7,784)  
12,858  
As of December 31, 2011  
Cost  
Amortization  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Goodwill  
1,903  
8,319  
5,400  
3,377  
(993)  
(2,626)  
(555)  
910  
5,693  
4,845  
965  
Proved mineral interests  
Unproved mineral interests  
Other intangible assets  
(2,412)  
Total intangible assets  
18,999  
(6,586)  
12,413  
264  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Changes in net intangible assets are analyzed in the following table:  
(M)  
Net amount  
as of  
January 1,  
Acquisitions  
Disposals  
Amortization  
and impairment  
Currency  
translation  
adjustment  
Other  
Net amount  
as of  
December 31,  
2013  
12,858  
2,746  
(292)  
(1,150)  
(602)  
(219)  
13,341  
2
2
012  
011  
12,413  
8,917  
2,466  
2,504  
(58)  
(428)  
(1,439)  
(991)  
(163)  
358  
(361)  
2,053  
12,858  
12,413  
In 2013, the heading “Other” mainly includes mineral interests in  
Utica reclassified into acquisitions for (455) million, the reclassification  
of assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for  
sale and discontinued operations” for (70) million (see Note 34  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and the reversal of the  
reclassification under IFRS 5 as at December 31, 2012 for  
In 2011, the heading “Other” mainly included Chesapeake’s  
Barnett shale mineral interests reclassified into the acquisitions  
for (649) million, the not yet paid part of the acquisition of  
Chesapeake’s mineral interests in Utica for 1,216 million, the  
reclassification of Joslyn’s mineral interests sold in 2011 and  
formerly classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets  
held for sale and discontinued operations” for 384 million, and  
249 million corresponding to disposals.  
697 million related to the acquisition of SunPower.  
In 2012, the heading “Other” mainly included the reclassification of  
assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale  
and discontinued operations” for (333) million (see Note 34 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements).  
A summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 is as follows:  
(M)  
Net goodwill  
as of  
Increases  
Impairments  
Other  
Net goodwill  
as of  
January 1, 2013  
December 31, 2013  
Upstream  
2
788  
74  
-
63  
-
-
-
-
-
-
(35)  
(9)  
2
816  
65  
Refining & Chemicals  
Marketing & Services  
Corporate  
25  
-
-
25  
Total  
889  
63  
-
(44)  
908  
11) Property, plant and equipment  
As of December 31, 2013  
Cost  
Depreciation  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Upstream properties  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
Work in progress  
97,534  
1,038  
25,138  
(60,489)  
37,045  
1,038  
25,097  
-
(41)  
Subtotal  
123,710  
(60,530)  
63,180  
Other property, plant and equipment  
Land  
1,339  
25,537  
6,563  
1,680  
7,046  
(422)  
(19,508)  
(4,257)  
(337)  
917  
6,029  
2,306  
1,343  
1,984  
Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)  
Buildings  
Work in progress  
Other  
(5,062)  
Subtotal  
42,165  
(29,586)  
(90,116)  
12,579  
75,759  
Total property, plant and equipment  
165,875  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
265  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2012  
Cost  
Depreciation  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Upstream properties  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
Work in progress  
87,896  
229  
26,645  
(57,832)  
-
30,064  
229  
26,473  
(172)  
Subtotal  
114,770  
(58,004)  
56,766  
Other property, plant and equipment  
Land  
1,354  
25,501  
6,489  
1,732  
6,840  
(407)  
(19,458)  
(4,172)  
(277)  
947  
6,043  
2,317  
1,455  
1,804  
Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)  
Buildings  
Work in progress  
Other  
(5,036)  
Subtotal  
41,916  
(29,350)  
(87,354)  
12,566  
69,332  
Total property, plant and equipment  
156,686  
As of December 31, 2011  
Cost  
Depreciation  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Upstream properties  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
Work in progress  
84,222  
209  
21,190  
(54,589)  
29,633  
209  
21,175  
-
(15)  
Subtotal  
105,621  
(54,604)  
51,017  
Other property, plant and equipment  
Land  
1,346  
25,838  
6,241  
1,534  
6,564  
(398)  
(18,349)  
(4,131)  
(306)  
948  
7,489  
2,110  
1,228  
1,665  
Machinery, plant and equipment (including transportation equipment)  
Buildings  
Work in progress  
Other  
(4,899)  
Subtotal  
41,523  
(28,083)  
(82,687)  
13,440  
64,457  
Total property, plant and equipment  
147,144  
Changes in net property, plant and equipment are analyzed in the following table:  
(M)  
Net amount  
as of January 1,  
Acquisitions  
Disposals  
Depreciation  
and impairment  
Currency  
translation  
adjustment  
Other  
Net amount  
as of December 31,  
2013  
69,332  
19,654  
(2,129)  
(8,908)  
(3,633)  
1,443  
75,759  
2
2
012  
011  
64,457  
54,964  
17,439  
15,443  
(633)  
(1,489)  
(9,042)  
(7,636)  
(409)  
1,692  
(2,480)  
1,483  
69,332  
64,457  
In 2013, the heading “Disposals” mainly includes the impact of  
sales of assets in the Upstream segment (sale of the Voyageur  
upgrader project in Canada and the sale of TOTAL’s interests  
in the Tempa Rossa field in Italy).  
In 2012, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” included the  
impact of impairments of shale gas assets in the Barnett basin  
recognized for 1,134 million (see Note 4E to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements).  
In 2013, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” includes the  
impact of impairments of assets recognized for 792 million (see  
Note 4D to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2012, the heading “Other” principally included the reclassification  
of assets in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for  
sale and discontinued operations” for an amount of 2,992 million.  
In 2013, the heading “Other” principally corresponds to the increase  
of the asset for site restitution for an amount of 2,069 million.  
It also includes (405) million related to the reclassification of assets  
classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale  
and discontinued operations” and (155) million related to the sale  
of the fertilizing businesses in Europe.  
In 2011, the heading “Disposals” mainly included the impact of sales of  
assets in the Upstream segment (disposal of the interests in Gassled in  
Norway and in Joslyn’s field in Canada) and in the Marketing & Services  
segment (disposal of Marketing assets in the United Kingdom) (see  
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2011, the heading “Depreciation and impairment” included the  
impact of impairments of assets recognized for 781 million (see  
Note 4D to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2012, the heading “Disposals” mainly included the impact of sales of  
assets in the Upstream segment in Great Britain, Norway and Nigeria.  
266  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
In 2011, the heading “Other” corresponded to the increase of the  
asset for site restitution for an amount of 653 million. It also  
included 428 million related to the reclassification of tangible  
assets of Joslyn and resins businesses sold in 2011 and formerly  
classified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for  
sale and discontinued operations”.  
Property, plant and equipment presented above includes the following amounts for facilities and equipment under finance leases that have  
been capitalized:  
As of December 31, 2013  
Cost  
Depreciation  
Net  
(M)  
and impairment  
Machinery, plant and equipment  
Buildings  
Other  
391  
54  
198  
(314)  
(26)  
(13)  
77  
28  
185  
Total  
643  
(353)  
290  
Net  
As of December 31, 2012  
Cost  
Depreciation  
(M)  
and impairment  
Machinery, plant and equipment  
Buildings  
Other  
391  
54  
207  
(294)  
(26)  
(2)  
97  
28  
205  
Total  
652  
(322)  
330  
Net  
As of December 31, 2011  
Cost  
Depreciation  
(M)  
and impairment  
Machinery, plant and equipment  
Buildings  
Other  
414  
54  
-
(284)  
(25)  
-
130  
29  
-
Total  
468  
(309)  
159  
12) Equity affiliates: investments and loans  
The contribution of equity affiliates in the consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statement of income and consolidated statement of  
comprehensive income is presented below:  
Equity value  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total Associates  
Total Joint ventures  
9,946  
2,281  
9,379  
2,020  
9,045  
1,704  
Total  
Loans  
Total  
12,227  
2,577  
11,399  
2,360  
10,749  
2,246  
14,804  
13,759  
12,995  
Equity share in profit/(loss)  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total Associates  
Total Joint ventures  
2,438  
133  
1,962  
48  
1,855  
70  
Total  
2,571  
2,010  
1,925  
Other comprehensive income  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Total Associates  
Total Joint ventures  
(684)  
(173)  
95  
65  
(34)  
19  
Total  
(857)  
160  
(15)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
267  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
In cases where the Group holds less than 20% of the voting rights in another entity, the determination of whether the Group exercises significant  
influence is also based on other facts and circumstances i.e., representation on the board of directors or an equivalent governing body of the entity,  
participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions relating to dividends or other distributions, significant transactions  
between the investor and the entity, exchange of management personnel, or provision of essential technical information.  
Information (100% gross) relating to significant associates is as follows:  
Upstream  
(M)  
Novatek(a)  
2012  
Liquefaction entities  
PetroCedeño  
2012  
2013  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2011  
Non current assets  
Current assets  
9,874  
2,051  
8,689  
1,252  
6,508  
1,611  
22,971  
5,572  
23,307  
5,669  
24,396  
4,726  
4,542  
3,668  
4,604  
3,410  
4,518  
2,596  
Total Assets  
11,925  
9,941  
8,119  
28,543  
28,976  
29,122  
8,210  
8,014  
7,114  
Shareholder’s equity  
Non current liabilities  
Current liabilities  
7,746  
3,578  
601  
7,040  
2,060  
841  
4,478  
2,271  
1,370  
16,863  
8,320  
3,360  
15,855  
9,615  
3,506  
16,586  
9,939  
2,597  
4,047  
135  
4,028  
4,228  
158  
3,628  
4,067  
181  
2,866  
Total Liabilities  
Revenues from sales  
Net income  
11,925  
7,044  
1,993  
9,941  
5,463  
2,914  
8,119  
3,094  
845  
28,543  
29,160  
10,828  
28,976  
29,807  
10,851  
29,122  
23,858  
10,112  
8,210  
3,100  
452  
8,014  
3,664  
406  
7,114  
3,133  
181  
Other comprehensive  
income  
(837)  
137  
(114)  
(751)  
(64)  
92  
(185)  
-
-
%
owned  
16.96%  
15.34% 14.09%  
30.32%  
30.32%  
30.32%  
Revaluation identifiable  
assets on equity affiliates  
Equity value  
Equity share in profit/(loss)  
Equity other  
2,570  
3,884  
167  
2,735  
3,815  
34  
2,737  
3,368  
24  
-
2,627  
1,526  
-
2,310  
1,377  
-
2,369  
1,290  
-
1,227  
137  
-
1,282  
123  
-
1,233  
55  
comprehensive income  
Dividends paid to the Group  
(448)  
77  
113  
69  
(96)  
21  
(116)  
1,189  
(7)  
1,485  
11  
1,272  
(56)  
137  
-
47  
-
-
(a) Information includes estimates at the date of Total’s financial statements.  
Novatek, listed in Moscow and London, is the 2nd largest producer of natural gas in Russia. The Group share of Novatek’s market value  
amounted to 4,542 million as at December 31, 2013.  
The Group’s interests in associates operating liquefaction plants are combined. The amounts include investments in; Nigeria LNG (15.00%),  
Angola LNG Ltd. (13.60%), Yemen LNG Co (39.62%), Qatargas (10.00%), Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited II – Train B (16.70%),  
Oman LNG (5.54%), Brass LNG (17.00%) and Abu Dhabi Gas Lc (5.00%).  
PetroCedeño produces and upgrades extra-heavy crude oil in Venezuela.  
268  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Refining & Chemicals  
(M)  
Saudi Aramco Total  
Qatar  
Refining & Petrochemicals  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non current assets  
Current assets  
8,960  
965  
7,867  
74  
5,893  
264  
2,079  
926  
1,941  
823  
1,964  
778  
Total Assets  
9,925  
7,941  
6,157  
3,005  
2,764  
2,742  
Shareholder’s equity  
Non current liabilities  
Current liabilities  
1,077  
7,571  
1,277  
472  
7,013  
456  
325  
4,835  
997  
1,906  
349  
750  
1,721  
686  
357  
1,477  
994  
271  
Total Liabilities  
9,925  
-
7,941  
-
6,157  
-
3,005  
1,627  
760  
2,764  
1,446  
720  
2,742  
1,297  
645  
Revenues from sales  
Net income  
(67)  
(45)  
(77)  
(8)  
(80)  
21  
Other comprehensive income  
(86)  
(31)  
62  
%
owned  
37.50%  
37.50%  
37.50%  
Revaluation identifiable assets on equity affiliates  
Equity value  
Equity share in profit/(loss)  
Equity other comprehensive income  
Dividends paid to the Group  
-
404  
(25)  
(17)  
-
-
177  
(29)  
(3)  
-
121  
(30)  
8
-
579  
261  
(26)  
169  
-
513  
234  
(8)  
-
376  
187  
19  
-
-
89  
76  
Saudi Aramco Total Refining & Petrochemicals is an entity including a refinery in Jubail, Saudi Arabia, with capacity of a 400,000 barrels/day  
with integrated petrochemical units.  
The Group’s interests in associates of the Refining & Chemicals segment, operating steam crackers and polyethylene lines in Qatar have  
been combined: Qatar Petrochemical Company Ltd. (20.00%) and Qatofin (49.09%).  
The information (100% gross) relating to significant joint ventures is as follows:  
(M)  
Liquefaction entities  
Samsung Total Petrochemicals  
(Refining & Chemicals)  
(Upstream)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non current assets  
Current assets exluding cash and cash equivalents  
Cash and cash equivalents  
9,114  
38  
260  
3,427  
99  
143  
913  
60  
8
2,744  
968  
114  
2,022  
918  
90  
1,626  
780  
242  
Total Assets  
9,412  
3,669  
981  
3,826  
3,030  
2,648  
Shareholder’s equity  
625  
5
7,756  
1,026  
-
904  
5
1,867  
893  
-
662  
10  
83  
76  
150  
1,694  
60  
1,002  
512  
1,516  
52  
682  
468  
312  
1,412  
38  
454  
508  
236  
Other non current liabilities  
Non current financial debts  
Other current liabilities  
Current financial debts  
558  
Total Liabilities  
9,412  
3,669  
981  
3,826  
3,030  
2,648  
Revenues from sales  
Depreciation and amortisation  
Interest income  
Interest expense  
Income taxes  
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,412  
(150)  
-
(16)  
(74)  
5,004  
(166)  
-
(26)  
(58)  
4,432  
(130)  
-
(20)  
(62)  
Net income  
(70)  
(63)  
2
(29)  
41  
284  
(40)  
136  
88  
228  
(10)  
Other comprehensive income  
(247)  
%
owned  
50.00%  
-
50.00%  
-
50.00%  
-
Revaluation identifiable assets on equity affiliates  
Equity value  
Equity share in profit/(loss)  
Equity other comprehensive income  
Dividends paid to the Group  
709  
844  
(16)  
(140)  
-
587  
781  
(13)  
21  
430  
576  
(7)  
26  
-
847  
142  
(20)  
34  
758  
68  
44  
706  
114  
(5)  
-
59  
49  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
269  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
The Group’s interests in joint ventures operating liquefaction plants  
have been combined. The amounts include investments in Yamal LNG  
in Russia (20.02% direct holding) and Ichthys LNG in Australia (30.00%).  
operates a petrochemical complex in Daesan, South Korea  
(condensate separator, steam cracker, styrene, paraxylene, polyolefins).  
Off balance sheet commitments relating to joint ventures are  
disclosed in Note 23 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Samsung Total Petrochemicals is a South Korean company that  
In Group share, the main aggregated financial items in equity consolidated affiliates, and that have not been presented individually are as follows:  
As of December 31, 2013 2012 2011  
(M)  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Non current assets  
Current assets  
2,914  
1,086  
1,059  
1,103  
2,512  
927  
714  
1,001  
2,709  
1,125  
673  
1,036  
Total Assets  
4,000  
2,162  
3,439  
1,715  
3,834  
1,709  
Shareholder’s equity  
Non current liabilities  
Current liabilities  
1,225  
1,614  
1,161  
590  
761  
811  
1,282  
1,306  
851  
481  
526  
708  
1,577  
1,272  
985  
423  
438  
848  
Total Liabilities  
4,000  
2,162  
3,439  
1,715  
3,834  
1,709  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
(M)  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Associates  
Joint  
ventures  
Revenues from sales  
2,944  
4,150  
2,984  
3,934  
5,429  
3,415  
Net income  
372  
7
223  
(7)  
329  
(37)  
Other comprehensive income  
Equity value  
Dividends paid to the Group  
(21)  
1,225  
336  
13  
590  
36  
-
1,282  
425  
-
481  
32  
24  
1,577  
367  
(2)  
423  
22  
The equity value of the Group’s share in Shtokman Development  
AG amounts to 254 million as of December 31, 2013.  
The studies performed on the Shtokman project demonstrated that  
initially selected technical solutions had too high capital and operating  
costs to provide an acceptable return on investment, and led the  
partners at the first quarter 2012 to redefine the development plan  
for LNG production only.  
In 2007, TOTAL and Gazprom signed an agreement for the first phase  
of development of the Shtokman gas and condensates offshore field  
located in the Barents Sea. A joint venture, Shtokman Development AG  
(
“SDAG”) (TOTAL, 25%) was created in 2008 to design, build, finance  
Within this framework, TOTAL and Gazprom are pursuing discussions  
so as to conclude a new agreement reflecting the revised development  
scheme and replacing the previous agreement of 2007 expired since  
and operate this first phase based on an initial development plan  
intended to produce 23.7 Bm /y (0.4 Mboe/d) of gas, with half of the  
gas being piped to Europe and the other half being exported as LNG.  
3
st  
July 1 , 2012. In parallel, TOTAL and Gazprom are pursuing dialogue  
on technical studies to achieve an economically viable project.  
13) Other investments  
The investments detailed below are classified as “Financial assets available for sale” (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements).  
As of December 31, 2013  
Carrying  
amount  
Unrealized gain  
(loss)  
Balance  
sheet value  
(M)  
Areva(a)  
CME Group  
Olympia Energy Fund – energy investment fund  
Gevo  
37  
1
36  
5
32  
10  
(7)  
-
69  
11  
29  
5
Other publicly traded equity securities  
1
1
2
Total publicly traded equity securities(b)  
80  
36  
116  
BBPP  
BTC Limited  
Other equity securities  
58  
104  
929  
-
-
-
58  
104  
929  
Total other equity securities(b)  
Other investments  
1,091  
1,171  
-
1,091  
1,207  
36  
270  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
As of December 31, 2012  
Carrying  
amount  
Unrealized gain  
(loss)  
Balance  
sheet value  
(M)  
Areva(a)  
CME Group  
37  
1
10  
7
47  
8
Olympia Energy Fund - energy investment fund  
Gevo  
38  
3
(6)  
-
32  
3
Other publicly traded equity securities  
1
-
1
Total publicly traded equity securities(b)  
80  
11  
91  
BBPP  
Ocensa  
BTC Limited  
Other equity securities  
61  
83  
119  
836  
-
-
-
-
61  
83  
119  
836  
Total other equity securities(b)  
Other investments  
1,099  
1,179  
-
1,099  
1,190  
11  
As of December 31, 2011  
Carrying  
amount  
Unrealized gain  
(loss)  
Balance  
sheet value  
(M)  
Sanofi  
2,100  
69  
-
351  
1
2,451  
70  
-
Areva(a)  
Arkema  
-
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Group  
Olympia Energy Fund - energy investment fund  
Gevo  
1
6
7
38  
15  
3
(5)  
(3)  
(1)  
33  
12  
2
Other publicly traded equity securities  
Total publicly traded equity securities(b)  
2,226  
349  
2,575  
BBPP  
62  
85  
132  
820  
-
-
-
-
62  
85  
132  
820  
Ocensa(c)  
BTC Limited  
Other equity securities  
Total other equity securities(b)  
Other investments  
1,099  
3,325  
-
1,099  
3,674  
349  
(a) Unrealized gain based on the investment certificate.  
(b) Including cumulative impairments of 722 million in 2013, 669 million in 2012 and 604 million in 2011.  
(c) End of the accounting for by the equity method of Ocensa in July 2011 (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
14) Other non-current assets  
As of December 31, 2013  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Loans and advances(a)  
Other  
2,953  
603  
(361)  
-
2,592  
603  
Total  
3,556  
(361)  
3,195  
As of December 31, 2012  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Loans and advances(a)  
Other  
2,593  
456  
(386)  
-
2,207  
456  
Total  
3,049  
(386)  
2,663  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
271  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Loans and advances(a)  
Other  
2,454  
402  
(399)  
-
2,055  
402  
Total  
2,856  
(399)  
2,457  
(a) Excluding loans to equity affiliates.  
Changes in the valuation allowance on loans and advances are detailed as follows:  
For the year  
ended December 31,  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of January 1,  
Increases Decreases  
Currency  
translation adjustment  
and other variations  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
(386)  
(16)  
7
34  
(361)  
2
2
012  
011  
(399)  
(464)  
(16)  
(25)  
18  
122  
11  
(32)  
(386)  
(399)  
15) Inventories  
As of December 31, 2013  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Crude oil and natural gas  
Refined products  
Chemicals products  
Trading inventories  
Other inventories  
3,274  
6,430  
1,172  
3,191  
2,697  
(18)  
(111)  
(78)  
-
3,256  
6,319  
1,094  
3,191  
2,163  
(534)  
Total  
16,764  
(741)  
16,023  
As of December 31, 2012  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Crude oil and natural gas  
Refined products  
Chemicals products  
Trading inventories  
Other inventories  
3,044  
7,169  
1,440  
3,782  
2,620  
(17)  
(86)  
(94)  
-
3,027  
7,083  
1,346  
3,782  
2,159  
(461)  
Total  
18,055  
(658)  
17,397  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Gross value  
Valuation allowance  
Net value  
Crude oil and natural gas  
Refined products  
Chemicals products  
Trading inventories  
Other inventories  
3,791  
7,483  
1,489  
3,233  
2,695  
(24)  
(36)  
(103)  
-
3,767  
7,447  
1,386  
3,233  
2,289  
(406)  
Total  
18,691  
(569)  
18,122  
Changes in the valuation allowance on inventories are as follows:  
For the year  
ended December 31,  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of January 1,  
Increase  
(net)  
Currency  
translation adjustment  
and other variations  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
(658)  
(119)  
36  
(741)  
2
2
012  
011  
(569)  
(445)  
(96)  
(83)  
7
(41)  
(658)  
(569)  
272  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
16) Accounts receivable and other current assets  
As of December 31, 2013  
(
M)  
Gross value  
17,523  
Valuation allowance  
(539)  
Net value  
16,984  
Accounts receivable  
Recoverable taxes  
Other operating receivables  
Prepaid expenses  
2,482  
7,303  
1,075  
50  
-
2,482  
7,191  
1,075  
50  
(112)  
-
-
Other current assets  
Other current assets  
10,910  
(112)  
10,798  
As of December 31, 2012  
(
M)  
Gross value  
19,678  
Valuation allowance  
(472)  
Net value  
19,206  
Accounts receivable  
Recoverable taxes  
Other operating receivables  
Prepaid expenses  
2,796  
6,416  
1,085  
47  
-
2,796  
6,158  
1,085  
47  
(258)  
-
-
Other current assets  
Other current assets  
10,344  
(258)  
10,086  
As of December 31, 2011  
(
M)  
Gross value  
20,532  
Valuation allowance  
(483)  
Net value  
20,049  
Accounts receivable  
Recoverable taxes  
Other operating receivables  
Prepaid expenses  
2,398  
7,750  
840  
-
2,398  
7,467  
840  
(283)  
-
-
Other current assets  
62  
62  
Other current assets  
11,050  
(283)  
10,767  
Changes in the valuation allowance on “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” are as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of January 1,  
Increase  
(net)  
Currency  
translation adjustments  
and other variations  
Valuation  
allowance  
as of December 31,  
(M)  
Accounts receivable  
013  
2
(472)  
(88)  
21  
(539)  
2
2
012  
011  
(483)  
(476)  
(56)  
4
67  
(11)  
(472)  
(483)  
Other current assets  
013  
2
(258)  
122  
24  
(112)  
2
2
012  
011  
(283)  
(136)  
26  
(132)  
(1)  
(15)  
(258)  
(283)  
As of December 31, 2013, the net portion of the overdue receivables  
included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets” was  
90 days, 679 million was due between 90 days and 6 months,  
260 million was due between 6 and 12 months and 478 million  
was due after 12 months.  
2,764 million, of which 1,135 million was due in less than 90  
days, 434 million was due between 90 days and 6 months,  
547 million was due between 6 and 12 months and 648 million  
As of December 31, 2011, the net portion of the overdue receivables  
included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets”  
was 3,556 million, of which 1,857 million was due in less than  
90 days, 365 million was due between 90 days and 6 months,  
746 million was due between 6 and 12 months and 588 million  
was due after 12 months.  
was due after 12 months.  
As of December 31, 2012, the net portion of the overdue receivables  
included in “Accounts receivable” and “Other current assets”  
was 3,442 million, of which 2,025 million was due in less than  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
273  
 
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
17) Shareholders’ equity  
Number of TOTAL shares  
an agent, representing more than 10% of the total voting rights for  
the Company’s shares. This limit applies to the aggregated amount  
of voting rights held directly, indirectly or through voting proxies.  
However, in the case of double voting rights, this limit may be  
extended to 20%.  
The Company’s common shares, par value 2.50, as of  
December 31, 2013 are the only category of shares.  
Shares may be held in either bearer or registered form.  
Double voting rights are granted to holders of shares that are  
fully-paid and held in the name of the same shareholder for at least  
two years, with due consideration for the total portion of the share  
capital represented. Double voting rights are also assigned to  
restricted shares in the event of an increase in share capital by  
incorporation of reserves, profits or premiums based on shares  
already held that are entitled to double voting rights.  
These restrictions no longer apply if any individual or entity, acting  
alone or in concert, acquires at least two-thirds of the total share  
capital of the Company, directly or indirectly, following a public  
tender offer for all of the Company’s shares.  
The authorized share capital amounts to 3,417,495,344 shares  
as of December 31, 2013 compared to 3,421,533,930 shares  
as of December 31, 2012 and 3,446,401,650 shares as of  
December 31, 2011.  
Pursuant to the Company’s bylaws (Statutes), no shareholder may  
cast a vote at a shareholders’ meeting, either by himself or through  
Variation of the share capital  
As of December 31, 2010  
2,349,640,931  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase reserved for employees  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
8
5
,
902  
,
717  
665  
,223  
,
As of December 31, 2011  
2,363,767,313  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase as part of a global  
free share plan intended for the Group Employees  
1,366,950  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
798,883  
As of December 31, 2012  
2,365,933,146  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase reserved for employees  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
10,802,215  
942,799  
As of 31 December 2013(a)  
2,377,678,160  
(a) Including 109,214,448 treasury shares deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
The variation of both weighted-average number of shares and weighted-average number of diluted shares respectively used in the  
calculation of earnings per share and fully-diluted earnings per share is detailed as follows:  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Number of shares as of January 1,  
2,365,933,146  
2,363,767,313  
2,349,640,931  
Number of shares issued during the year (pro rated)  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
Exercise of TOTAL share purchase options  
TOTAL performance shares  
248,606  
-
1,197,228  
227  
663,429  
3,412,123  
-
978,503  
506  
-
991,126  
683,868  
-
Global free TOTAL share plan(a)  
Capital increase reserved for employees  
TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A. or by its subsidiaries  
and deducted from shareholders’ equity  
7,201,477  
5,935,145  
(110,230,889)  
(110,304,173)  
(112,487,679)  
Weighted-average number of shares  
2,264,349,795  
2,255,801,563  
2,247,479,529  
Dilutive effect  
TOTAL share subscription and purchase options  
TOTAL performance shares  
554,224  
4,924,693  
852,057  
247,527  
7,748,805  
1,703,554  
1,134,296  
470,095  
6,174,808  
2,523,233  
303,738  
Global free TOTAL share plan(a)  
Capital increase reserved for employees  
862,889  
Weighted-average number of diluted shares  
2,271,543,658  
2,266,635,745  
2,256,951,403  
(a) The Board of Directors approved on May 21, 2010 the implementation and conditions of a global free share plan intended for the Group Employees.  
274  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Capital increase reserved for Group employees  
Share cancellation  
The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012, in its seventeenth  
resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the authority  
to carry out in one or more occasions within a maximum period  
of twenty-six months, a capital increase reserved for employees  
belonging to an employee savings plan.  
The Group did not proceed with a reduction of capital by cancellation  
of shares held by the Company during the fiscal years 2011, 2012  
and 2013.  
Treasury shares  
(TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A.)  
The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012, in its eighteenth  
resolution, also delegated to the Board of Directors the powers  
necessary to accomplish in one or more occasions within a maximum  
period of eighteen months, a capital increase with the objective of  
providing employees with their registered office located outside  
France with benefits comparable to those granted to the employees  
included in the seventeenth resolution of the Combined General  
Meeting of May 11, 2012.  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL S.A. holds 8,883,180 of its own  
shares, representing 0.37% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
8,764,020 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans  
for Group employees; and  
– 119,160 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL  
share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, during its  
September 18, 2012, meeting, decided to proceed with a capital  
increase reserved for employees that included a classic offering and  
a leverage offering depending on the employees’ choice, within the  
limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012.  
This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215  
shares with a par value of 2.5 at a unit price of 30.70. The issuance  
of the shares was acknowledged on April 25, 2013.  
These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
As of December 31, 2012, TOTAL S.A. holds 8,060,371 of its own  
shares, representing 0.34% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
– 7,994,470 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans  
for Group employees; and  
65,901 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL  
share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
The prior capital increase reserved for employees of the Group was  
decided by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2010, under  
the terms of the authorization of the Combined General Meeting of  
May 21, 2010, and resulted in the subscription of 8,902,717 shares  
with a par value of 2.5 at a unit price of 34.80. The issuance of  
the shares was acknowledged on April 28, 2011.  
These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL S.A. held 9,222,905 of its own  
shares, representing 0.39% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
6,712,528 shares allocated to TOTAL share grant plans for  
Group Employees;  
Capital increase as part of a global free share plan  
intended for Group employees  
– 2,510,377 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL  
share purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 16, 2008, in its seventeenth  
resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to grant,  
in one or more occasions within a maximum period of thirty-eight  
months, restricted shares to employees and executive officers of  
the Company or companies outside France affiliated with the Company,  
within a limit of 0.8% of the outstanding share capital of the Company  
as of the date of the decision of the Board of Directors to grant  
such shares.  
These shares were deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
TOTAL shares held by Group subsidiaries  
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, TOTAL S.A. held  
indirectly through its subsidiaries 100,331,268 of its own shares,  
representing 4.22% of its share capital as of December 31, 2013,  
4.24% of its share capital as of December 31, 2012 and 4.24%  
of its share capital as of December 31, 2011 detailed as follows:  
Pursuant to this delegation, the Board of Directors, during its  
May 21, 2010 meeting, determined the terms of a global free share  
plan intended for Group Employees and granted the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer all powers necessary to implement this plan.  
2,023,672 shares held by a consolidated subsidiary, Total  
Nucléaire, 100% indirectly controlled by TOTAL S.A.; and  
– 98,307,596 shares held by subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine  
Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval), 100% indirectly  
(
As a result, on July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer of the Group acknowledged the issuance and the final  
allocation of 1,366,950 ordinary shares with a nominal value of  
controlled by TOTAL S.A.  
These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
2.50 to beneficiaries designated by the terms defined by the  
Board of Directors meeting held on May 21, 2010.  
Dividend  
On December 31, 2013, 873,475 additional shares may be  
issued as part of this plan.  
TOTAL S.A. paid on March 21, 2013, the third quarterly interim  
dividend of 0.59 per share for the fiscal year 2012 (the  
ex-dividend date was March 18, 2013). TOTAL S.A. also paid on  
June 27, 2013, the balance of the dividend of 0.59 per share  
for the 2012 fiscal year (the ex-dividend date was June 24, 2013).  
In addition, TOTAL S.A. paid two quarterly interim dividends for the  
fiscal year 2013:  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
275  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
The first quarterly interim dividend of 0.59 per share for the fiscal  
year 2013, decided by the Board of Directors on April 25, 2013,  
was paid on September 27, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was  
September 24, 2013); and  
of the paid-in surplus may also be distributed subject to taxation  
except in cases of a refund of shareholder contributions.  
As of December 31, 2013, paid-in surplus amounted to  
28,020 million (27,684 million as of December 31, 2012  
The second quarterly interim dividend of 0.59 per share for the  
fiscal year 2013, decided by the Board of Directors on July 25, 2013,  
was paid on December 19, 2013 (the ex-dividend date was  
December 16, 2013).  
and 27,655 million as of December 31, 2011).  
Reserves  
Under French law, 5% of net income must be transferred to  
the legal reserve until the legal reserve reaches 10% of the nominal  
value of the share capital. This reserve cannot be distributed  
to the shareholders other than upon liquidation but can be used  
to offset losses.  
The Board of Directors, during its October 30, 2013 meeting,  
decided to set the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year  
2
013 at 0.59 per share. This interim dividend will be paid on  
March 27, 2014 (the ex-dividend date will be March 24, 2014).  
A resolution will be submitted at the shareholders’ meeting on  
May 16, 2014 to pay a dividend of 2.38 per share for the 2013  
fiscal year, i.e., a balance of 0.61 per share to be distributed after  
deducting the three quarterly interim dividends of 0.59 per share  
that will have already been paid.  
If wholly distributed, the unrestricted reserves of the parent  
company would be taxed for an approximate amount of  
568 million as of December 31, 2013 (539 million as of  
December 31, 2012 and 539 million as of December 31, 2011)  
with regards to additional corporation tax to be applied on  
regulatory reserves so that they become distributable.  
Paid-in surplus  
Futhermore, the additional tax to corporate income tax of 3%,  
due on dividends distributed by French companies or foreign  
organizations subject to corporate income tax in France, established  
by the second corrective finance act for 2012 would be payable for  
an amount of 405 million (375 million as of December 31, 2012).  
In accordance with French law, the paid-in surplus corresponds to  
premiums related to shares, contributions or mergers of the parent  
company which can be capitalized or used to offset losses if the  
legal reserve has reached its minimum required level. The amount  
Other comprehensive income  
Detail of other comprehensive income showing items reclassified from equity to net income is presented in the table below:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Actuarial gains and losses  
Tax effect  
513  
(911)  
362  
(533)  
191  
(216)  
Subtotal items not potentially  
reclassifiable to profit & loss  
297  
(549)  
(702)  
(342)  
Currency translation adjustment  
Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period  
Less gain/(loss) included in net income  
(2,199)  
1,483  
(2,216)  
(17)  
(713)  
(11)  
1,420  
(63)  
Available for sale financial assets  
Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period  
Less gain/(loss) included in net income  
25  
(338)  
65  
337  
(84)  
25  
-
63  
401  
382  
45  
Cash flow hedge  
117  
Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period  
Less gain/(loss) included in net income  
182  
65  
152  
87  
(131)  
(47)  
Share of other comprehensive income  
of equity affiliates, net amount  
Other  
(857)  
(4)  
160  
(14)  
(15)  
(3)  
Unrealized gain/(loss) of the period  
Less gain/(loss) included in net income  
(4)  
-
(14)  
-
(3)  
-
Tax effect  
(47)  
(2,965)  
(2,668)  
63  
(766)  
(55)  
1,663  
1,321  
Subtotal items potentially reclassifiable to profit & loss  
Total other comprehensive income, net amount  
(1,315)  
276  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Tax effects relating to each component of other comprehensive income are as follows:  
For the year ended December 31, 2013 2012  
2011  
(M)  
Pre-tax  
amount  
Tax  
effect  
Net  
amount  
Pre-tax  
amount  
Tax  
effect  
Net  
amount  
Pre-tax  
amount  
Tax  
effect  
Net  
amount  
Actuarial gains and losses  
513  
(216)  
297  
(911)  
362  
(549)  
(533)  
191  
(342)  
Subtotal items not potentially  
reclassifiable to profit & loss  
513  
(216)  
297  
(911)  
362  
(549)  
(533)  
191  
(342)  
Currency translation adjustment  
Available for sale financial assets  
Cash flow hedge  
(2,199)  
25  
-
(6)  
(41)  
(2,199)  
19  
(702)  
(338)  
65  
-
89  
(26)  
(702)  
(249)  
39  
1,483  
337  
(84)  
-
(93)  
38  
1,483  
244  
(46)  
117  
76  
Share of other comprehensive  
income of equity affiliates, net amount  
Other  
(857)  
(4)  
-
-
(857)  
(4)  
160  
(14)  
-
-
160  
(14)  
(15)  
(3)  
-
-
(15)  
(3)  
Subtotal items potentially  
reclassifiable to profit & loss  
(2,918)  
(47)  
(2,965)  
(2,668)  
(829)  
63  
(766)  
1,718  
1,185  
(55)  
136  
1,663  
1,321  
Total other comprehensive income (2,405)  
(263)  
(1,740)  
425  
(1,315)  
Non-controlling interests  
As of 31 December 2013, no subsidiary has non-controlling interests that would have a material effect on the Group financial statements.  
18) Employee benefits obligations  
Liabilities for employee benefits obligations consist of the following:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Pension benefits liabilities  
Other benefits liabilities  
2,244  
571  
2,774  
701  
2,413  
628  
Restructuring reserves (early retirement plans)  
256  
269  
344  
Total  
3,071  
3,744  
3,385  
Net liabilities relating to assets held for sale  
-
9
-
Description of plans and risk management  
In order to manage the inherent risks, the Group has implemented  
a dedicated governance framework to ensure the supervision  
of the different plans. These governance rules provide for:  
The Group operates for the benefit of its current and former  
employees both defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans.  
the Group’s representation in key governance bodies or  
monitoring Committees;  
the principles of the funding policy;  
The Group recognized a charge of 97 million for defined  
contribution plans in 2013.  
The Group’s main defined benefit pension plans are located  
in France, the United Kingdom, the United States, Belgium  
and Germany. Their main characteristics, depending on the  
country-specific regulatory environment, are the following:  
– the general investment policy, including for most plans the  
establishment of a monitoring committee to define and follow  
the investment strategy and performance and ensure the  
principles in respect of investment allocation are respected;  
a procedure for to approve the establishment of new plans  
or amendment of existing plans;  
principles of administration, communication and reporting.  
the benefits are usually based on the final salary and seniority;  
they are usually funded (pension fund or insurer);  
they are usually closed to new employees who benefit from  
defined contribution pension plans; and  
they are paid in annuity or in lump sum.  
The pension benefits include also termination indemnities and early  
retirement benefits. The other benefits are employer contributions  
to post-employment medical care.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
277  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Change in benefit obligations and plan assets  
The fair value of the defined benefit obligation and plan assets in the Consolidated Financial Statements is detailed as follows:  
As of December 31,  
Pension benefits  
Other benefits  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Change in benefit obligation  
Benefit obligation at beginning of year  
Current service cost  
Interest cost  
Past service cost  
Settlements  
Plan participants’ contributions  
Benefits paid  
Actuarial losses (gains)  
Foreign currency translation and other  
10,893  
219  
388  
9
(68)  
8
(540)  
(273)  
(259)  
9,322  
180  
429  
204  
-
8,740  
163  
420  
9
(111)  
9
(451)  
435  
108  
701  
16  
23  
(51)  
(1)  
-
(34)  
(69)  
(14)  
628  
14  
29  
8
623  
13  
28  
3
-
-
-
-
9
(549)  
1,217  
81  
(37)  
58  
1
(34)  
(9)  
4
Benefit obligation at year-end  
Of which plans entirely or partially funded  
Of which plans not funded  
10,377  
9,632  
745  
10,893  
9,918  
975  
9,322  
8,277  
1,045  
571  
-
571  
701  
-
701  
628  
-
628  
Change in fair value of plan assets  
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year  
Interest income  
Actuarial losses (gains)  
Settlements  
Plan participants’ contributions  
Employer contributions  
Benefits paid  
(8,148)  
(307)  
(187)  
69  
(8)  
(224)  
453  
(7,028)  
(339)  
(366)  
-
(6,809)  
(338)  
108  
80  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(9)  
(9)  
(787)  
452  
(71)  
(347)  
386  
(99)  
Foreign currency translation and other  
163  
Fair value of plan assets at year-end  
Unfunded status  
(8,189)  
2,188  
21  
(8,148)  
2,745  
15  
(7,028)  
2,294  
14  
-
571  
-
-
701  
-
-
628  
-
Asset ceiling  
Net recognized amount  
2,208  
2,760  
2,308  
571  
701  
628  
Pension benefits and other benefits liabilities  
Other non-current assets  
Net benefit liabilities relating to assets held for sale  
2,244  
(36)  
-
2,774  
(23)  
9
2,413  
(105)  
-
571  
701  
628  
-
-
-
-
-
-
278  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The amounts recognized in the consolidated income statement and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for defined benefit  
plans are detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
Pension benefits  
Other benefits  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Current service cost  
Past service cost  
Settlements  
219  
9
1
180  
204  
-
163  
9
(31)  
82  
16  
(51)  
(1)  
14  
8
-
13  
3
-
Net interest cost  
81  
90  
23  
29  
28  
Benefit amounts recognized in Profit & Loss  
310  
474  
223  
(13)  
51  
44  
Actuarial (Gains) Losses  
Effect of changes in demographic assumptions  
Effect of changes in financial assumptions  
Effect of experience adjustments  
4
(226)  
(51)  
32  
1,030  
155  
64  
419  
(48)  
(7)  
(51)  
(11)  
(1)  
67  
(8)  
(9)  
10  
(10)  
Actual return on plan assets  
(
excluding interest income)  
(187)  
16  
(366)  
2
108  
(1)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Effect of asset ceiling  
Benefit amounts recognized in Equity  
(444)  
853  
542  
(69)  
58  
(9)  
Total benefit amounts recognized  
in other comprehensive income  
(134)  
1,327  
765  
(82)  
109  
35  
The past service cost recognized in 2012 for 204 million is mainly due to the amendment of certain French plans.  
Expected future cash out flow  
The average duration of accrued benefits is approximately 15 years for defined pension benefits and 14 years for other benefits. The Group  
expects to pay contributions of 183 million in respect of funded pension plans in 2014.  
Estimated future benefits either financed from plan assets or directly paid by the employer are detailed as follows:  
Estimated future payments  
As of December 31, (M)  
Pension benefits  
Other benefits  
2
2
2
2
2
2
014  
015  
016  
017  
018  
019-2023  
566  
540  
550  
583  
541  
29  
29  
30  
30  
30  
2,896  
159  
Type of assets  
Asset allocation  
Pension benefits  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Equity securities  
Debt securities  
Monetary  
30%  
64%  
2%  
29%  
64%  
3%  
29%  
64%  
4%  
Real estate  
4%  
4%  
3%  
Investments on equity and debt markets are quoted on active markets.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
279  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Main actuarial assumptions and sensitivity analysis  
Assumptions used to  
determine benefits obligations  
Pension benefits  
Other benefits  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Discount rate (weighted average for all regions)  
Of which Eurozone  
Of which United States  
Of which United Kingdom  
Inflation rate (weighted average for all regions)  
Of which Eurozone  
4.14%  
3.40%  
4.74%  
4.50%  
2.67%  
2.00%  
3.50%  
3.79%  
3.20%  
4.00%  
4.25%  
2.24%  
2.00%  
2.75%  
4.61%  
4.21%  
5.00%  
4.75%  
2.35%  
2.00%  
3.00%  
4.14%  
3.44%  
4.71%  
-
3.82%  
3.19%  
4.00%  
-
4.70%  
4.25%  
4.97%  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Of which United Kingdom  
The discount rate retained is determined by reference to the high quality rates for AA-rated corporate bonds for a duration equivalent to that  
of the obligations. It derives from a benchmark per monetary area of different market data at the closing date.  
A 0.5% increase or decrease in discount rates – all other things being equal – would have the following approximate impact on the benefit obligation:  
(M)  
0.5% increase  
0.5% decrease  
Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013  
(728)  
827  
A 0.5% increase or decrease in inflation rates – all other things being equal – would have the following approximate impact on the benefit obligation:  
(M)  
0.5% increase  
0.5% decrease  
Benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013  
497  
(454)  
19) Provisions and other non-current liabilities  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Litigations and accrued penalty claims  
Provisions for environmental contingencies  
Asset retirement obligations  
Other non-current provisions  
Other non-current liabilities  
624  
841  
9,287  
1,104  
845  
930  
556  
7,624  
1,028  
1,447  
572  
600  
6,884  
1,099  
1,754  
Total  
12,701  
11,585  
10,909  
In 2013, litigation reserves mainly include a provision of 624 million of  
which 506 million is in the Upstream, notably in Angola and Nigeria.  
Other risks and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities  
are described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
to the acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica  
shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
In 2012, litigation reserves mainly included a provision of $398 million  
in relation to a transaction in progress with the United States  
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department  
of Justice (DoJ) in the United States (see Note 32 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements). It also included a provision covering risks  
concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema for an amount  
of 17 million as of December 31, 2012. Other risks and commitments  
that give rise to contingent liabilities are described in Note 32 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements.  
In 2013, other non-current provisions mainly include:  
The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
explosion (civil liability) for 13 million as of December 31, 2013;  
Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Refining &  
Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments for 199 million  
as of December 31, 2013;  
Provisions for financial risks related to non-consolidated and equity  
consolidated affiliates for 172 million as of December 31, 2013;  
In 2012, other non-current provisions mainly included:  
The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
The contingency reserve regarding guarantees granted  
in relation to solar panels of SunPower for 108 million as  
of December 31, 2013.  
explosion (civil liability) for 17 million as of December 31, 2012;  
Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Refining &  
Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments for 196 million  
as of December 31, 2012;  
In 2013, other non-current liabilities mainly include debts (whose  
maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions.  
This heading is mainly composed of a 92 million debt related  
Provisions for financial risks related to non-consolidated  
and equity consolidated affiliates for 147 million as of  
December 31, 2012; and  
280  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The contingency reserve regarding guarantees granted  
in relation to solar panels of SunPower for 89 million as  
of December 31, 2012.  
In 2011, other non-current provisions mainly included:  
The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
explosion (civil liability) for 21 million as of December 31, 2011;  
In 2012, other non-current liabilities mainly included debts (whose  
maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions.  
This heading was mainly composed of a 737 million debt related  
to the acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica  
shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
Provisions related to restructuring activities in the Refining &  
Chemicals and Marketing & Services segments for 227 million  
as of December 31, 2011; and  
– The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot  
explosion (civil liability) for 80 million as of December 31, 2011.  
In 2011, litigation reserves mainly included a provision covering  
risks concerning antitrust investigations related to Arkema  
amounting to 17 million as of December 31, 2011. Other risks  
and commitments that give rise to contingent liabilities are  
described in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
In 2011, other non-current liabilities mainly included debts (whose  
maturity is more than one year) related to fixed assets acquisitions.  
This heading was mainly composed of a 991 million debt related  
to the acquisition of an interest in the liquids-rich area of the Utica  
shale play (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
Changes in provisions and other non-current liabilities  
Changes in provisions and other non-current liabilities are as follows:  
(M)  
As of  
January 1,  
Allowances  
Reversals  
Currency  
translation  
adjustment  
Other  
As of  
December 31,  
2013  
11,585  
1,309  
(1,014)  
(612)  
1,433  
12,701  
2
2
012  
011  
10,909  
9,098  
1,217  
921  
(887)  
(798)  
47  
227  
299  
1,461  
11,585  
10,909  
Allowances  
(SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States  
see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);  
(
In 2013, allowances for the period (1,309 million) mainly includes:  
Provisions for asset retirement obligations for 287 million;  
Environmental contingencies written back for 75 million;  
Asset retirement obligations for 439 million (accretion);  
Environmental contingencies for 358 million in the  
Marketing & Services and Refining & Chemicals segments  
of which 272 million is related to the Carling site in France;  
– The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
explosion (civil liability), written back for 4 million;  
Provisions related to restructuring of activities for 117 million.  
– Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for  
76 million.  
In 2012, allowances of the period (1,217 million) mainly included:  
In 2012, reversals of the period (887 million) were mainly related  
to the following incurred expenses:  
Asset retirement obligations for 405 million (accretion);  
Environmental contingencies for 74 million in the  
Marketing & Services and Refining & Chemicals segments;  
Provisions for asset retirement obligations for 314 million;  
Environmental contingencies written back for 109 million;  
Provisions related to restructuring of activities for 74 million;  
The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
A provision of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress  
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission  
explosion (civil liability), written back for 10 million;  
(
(
SEC) and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in the United States  
see Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
– The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot  
explosion (civil liability), written back for 81 million; and  
In 2011, allowances of the period (921 million) mainly included:  
– Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for  
111 million.  
Asset retirement obligations for 344 million (accretion);  
In 2011, reversals of the period (798 million) were mainly related  
to the following incurred expenses:  
Environmental contingencies for 100 million in the  
Refining & Chemicals segments; and  
Provisions for asset retirement obligations for 189 million;  
Environmental contingencies written back for 70 million;  
Provisions related to restructuring of activities for 79 million.  
Reversals  
The contingency reserve related to the Toulouse-AZF plant  
In 2013, reversals of the period (1,014 million) are mainly related  
explosion (civil liability), written back for 10 million;  
to the following incurred expenses:  
The contingency reserve related to the Buncefield depot  
explosion (civil liability), written back for 116 million; and  
A provision of $398 million in relation to a transaction in progress  
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission  
Provisions for restructuring and social plans written back for  
164 million.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
281  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Changes in the asset retirement obligation  
Changes in the asset retirement obligation are as follows:  
(M)  
As of  
January 1,  
Accretion  
Revision in  
estimates  
New  
obligations  
Spending on  
existing  
obligations  
Currency  
translation  
adjustment  
Other  
As of  
December 31,  
2013  
7,624  
439  
1,653  
416  
(287)  
(523)  
(35)  
9,287  
2
2
012  
011  
6,884  
5,917  
405  
344  
183  
330  
115  
323  
(314)  
(189)  
82  
150  
269  
9
7,624  
6,884  
In 2013 the heading “Revision in estimates” includes additional provisions in respect of asset restitution costs and the impact of the revision  
of the discount rate.  
In 2012 the heading “Other” included 385 million increase in provisions to cover the costs of abandonment of wells in the Elgin-Franklin field  
(Great Britain) that will not return to production, and a 183 million increase in provisions for the restoration of the Lacq site in France on which  
activities are going to be stopped. These amounts were partially offset by sales of assets notably in Great Britain and Norway that have been  
reclassified in accordance with IFRS 5 “Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations” (see Note 34 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements).  
20) Financial debt and related financial instruments  
A) Non-current financial debt and related financial instruments  
As of December 31, 2013  
(M)  
(Assets)/Liabilities  
Secured Unsecured  
Total  
Non-current financial debt  
of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)  
519  
24,550  
236  
(1,028)  
25,069  
236  
(1,028)  
-
-
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
519  
23,522  
24,041  
Bonds after fair value hedge  
Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge  
Bank and other, floating rate  
Bank and other, fixed rate  
Financial lease obligations  
-
-
18,828  
4,408  
179  
18,828  
4,408  
304  
125  
114  
280  
107  
221  
280  
-
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
519  
23,522  
24,041  
(a) See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
As of December 31, 2012  
(M)  
(Assets)/Liabilities  
Secured Unsecured  
Total  
Non-current financial debt  
of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)  
713  
21,561  
11  
(1,626)  
22,274  
11  
(1,626)  
-
-
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
713  
19,935  
20,648  
Bonds after fair value hedge  
Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge  
Bank and other, floating rate  
Bank and other, fixed rate  
Financial lease obligations  
-
-
15,227  
4,504  
29  
15,227  
4,504  
335  
306  
81  
326  
168  
7
249  
333  
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
713  
19,935  
20,648  
(a) See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
282  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
(Assets)/Liabilities  
Secured Unsecured  
Total  
Non-current financial debt  
of which hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (liabilities)  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (assets)(a)  
349  
22,208  
146  
(1,976)  
22,557  
146  
(1,976)  
-
-
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
349  
20,232  
20,581  
Bonds after fair value hedge  
Fixed rate bonds and bonds after cash flow hedge  
Bank and other, floating rate  
-
-
15,148  
4,424  
446  
15,148  
4,424  
575  
129  
76  
Bank and other, fixed rate  
206  
282  
Financial lease obligations  
144  
8
152  
Non-current financial debt – net of hedging instruments  
349  
20,232  
20,581  
(a) See the description of these hedging instruments in Notes 1 paragraph M(iii) “Long-term financing”, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
283  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Fair value of bonds, as of December 31, 2013, after taking into account currency and interest rates swaps, is detailed as follows:  
Bonds after  
Year of  
issue  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Currency  
Maturity  
Initial rate  
fair value hedge  
before  
hedging as of hedging as of hedging as of  
December 31, December 31, December 31,  
hedging  
instruments  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Parent company  
Bond  
1998  
-
-
127  
(127)  
129  
-
FRF  
2013  
5.000%  
Current portion (less than one year)  
Total Parent company  
-
-
129  
TOTAL CAPITAL(a)  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
2002  
2003  
2004  
2004  
2005  
2005  
2005  
2005  
2005  
2005  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2006  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2007  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
-
-
-
49  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
23  
-
51  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
125  
127  
130  
65  
64  
63  
129  
-
15  
23  
129  
52  
63  
200  
65  
97  
404  
57  
62  
72  
USD  
USD  
CHF  
NZD  
AUD  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
EUR  
NZD  
AUD  
CAD  
EUR  
GBP  
EUR  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
USD  
USD  
AUD  
CAD  
GBP  
EUR  
GBP  
GBP  
GBP  
CHF  
JPY  
2012  
2013  
2012  
2014  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2013  
2014  
2016  
2016  
2016  
2016  
2018  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2014  
2014  
2014  
2014  
2015  
2017  
2018  
2018  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
5.890%  
4.500%  
2.375%  
6.750%  
5.750%  
2.135%  
2.135%  
2.375%  
3.250%  
6.500%  
5.625%  
4.125%  
3.250%  
4.625%  
3.250%  
2.510%  
2.635%  
2.385%  
2.385%  
2.385%  
2.385%  
3.135%  
5.000%  
5.000%  
6.500%  
4.125%  
4.625%  
4.125%  
5.500%  
5.500%  
5.500%  
2.635%  
1.505%  
2.635%  
1.723%  
3.125%  
4.700%  
3.135%  
3.135%  
2.135%  
3.635%  
2.385%  
2.385%  
2.385%  
3.250%  
4.625%  
4.625%  
4.625%  
6.000%  
5.000%  
100  
74  
100  
125  
127  
130  
65  
64  
63  
129  
370  
222  
61  
72  
71  
300  
73  
306  
72  
248  
31  
61  
127  
130  
65  
64  
63  
129  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
300  
73  
305  
72  
248  
31  
61  
49  
121  
300  
76  
60  
-
-
248  
31  
61  
49  
121  
300  
76  
60  
-
CHF  
JPY  
49  
121  
300  
76  
60  
62  
124  
46  
92  
64  
50  
CHF  
EUR  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
EUR  
GBP  
GBP  
GBP  
NOK  
USD  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
63  
63  
63  
62  
-
-
-
-
69  
284  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Bonds after  
Year of  
issue  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Currency  
Maturity  
Initial rate  
fair value hedge  
before  
hedging as of hedging as of hedging as of  
December 31, December 31, December 31,  
hedging  
instruments  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
TOTAL CAPITAL(a) (continued)  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2008  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2010  
2011  
2011  
2013  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
61  
62  
61  
62  
-
60  
61  
127  
62  
200  
100  
999  
63  
149  
191  
61  
62  
61  
62  
56  
54  
236  
77  
131  
998  
150  
40  
105  
550  
684  
227  
99  
115  
225  
448  
69  
103  
69  
60  
61  
128  
62  
200  
100  
1,000  
63  
149  
191  
61  
62  
61  
62  
56  
54  
236  
77  
131  
998  
150  
40  
107  
550  
684  
232  
99  
115  
225  
448  
69  
105  
70  
AUD  
AUD  
CHF  
CHF  
EUR  
EUR  
EUR  
GBP  
JPY  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
7.500%  
7.500%  
3.135%  
3.135%  
4.125%  
4.125%  
4.750%  
5.500%  
2013 EURIBOR 6months +0.008%  
USD  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
CHF  
AUD  
AUD  
CHF  
USD  
CHF  
EUR  
EUR  
HKD  
AUD  
EUR  
USD  
USD  
CHF  
GBP  
GBP  
EUR  
HKD  
AUD  
AUD  
AUD  
AUD  
CAD  
EUR  
NZD  
USD  
USD  
USD  
GBP  
AUD  
USD  
2013  
2015  
2015  
2015  
2018  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2014  
2014  
2014  
2014  
2015  
2015  
2015  
2015  
2016  
2017  
2017  
2019  
2019  
2014  
2015  
2015  
2015  
2014  
2022  
2014  
2015  
2015  
2016  
2018  
2016  
2018  
4.000%  
3.135%  
3.135%  
3.135%  
3.135%  
5.500%  
5.500%  
2.500%  
4.000%  
2.625%  
3.500%  
3.500%  
3.240%  
6.000%  
3.625%  
3.125%  
3.125%  
2.385%  
4.250%  
4.250%  
4.875%  
4.180%  
5.750%  
6.000%  
6.000%  
6.000%  
2.500%  
3.125%  
4.750%  
2.875%  
3.000%  
2.300%  
3.875%  
6.500%  
1.450%  
-
-
-
131  
997  
150  
40  
100  
549  
684  
217  
99  
115  
225  
451  
69  
99  
66  
67  
64  
104  
461  
51  
70  
64  
71  
64  
109  
482  
53  
189  
947  
757  
586  
113  
-
111  
491  
54  
193  
966  
773  
597  
116  
-
181  
906  
725  
560  
108  
725  
(2,137)  
Current portion (less than one year)  
(3,333)  
(2,992)  
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
7,626  
9,204  
12,617  
TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
2011  
543  
544  
72  
-
80  
567  
567  
76  
743  
83  
69  
-
565  
565  
75  
738  
82  
69  
-
USD  
USD  
AUD  
USD  
NOK  
SEK  
USD  
AUD  
USD  
2014  
1.625%  
2011  
2011  
2011  
2011  
2011  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2014 USLIBOR 3 months +0.38%  
2014 5.750%  
2013 USLIBOR 3 months +0.09%  
2016  
2016  
2018  
2018  
2023  
4.000%  
3.625%  
1.450%  
4.000%  
2.750%  
68  
724  
111  
362  
-
-
-
-
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
285  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Bonds after  
Year of  
issue  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Fair value  
after  
Currency  
Maturity  
Initial rate  
fair value hedge  
before  
hedging as of hedging as of hedging as of  
December 31, December 31, December 31,  
hedging  
instruments  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)  
continued)  
(
Bond  
Bond  
2013  
2013  
726  
707  
(1,159)  
-
-
-
-
-
USD  
EUR  
2016 USLIBOR 3 months +0.38%  
2020  
4.000%  
Current portion (less than one year)  
(743)  
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
CANADA Ltd  
2,778  
1,362  
2,094  
TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL(C)  
2012  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
75  
725  
111  
1,088  
73  
106  
464  
362  
724  
76  
78  
758  
116  
1,137  
76  
111  
485  
379  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AUD  
USD  
AUD  
USD  
NOK  
NOK  
EUR  
USD  
USD  
NOK  
AUD  
CAD  
EUR  
USD  
USD  
NOK  
USD  
EUR  
USD  
USD  
CAD  
EUR  
EUR  
2017  
2017  
2017  
2017  
2016  
2017  
2023  
2016  
2023  
2017  
2017  
2017  
2023  
2016  
2016  
2018  
4.875%  
1.500%  
4.125%  
1.550%  
2.250%  
2.250%  
2.125%  
0.750%  
2.700%  
2.250%  
3.875%  
2.000%  
2.125%  
0.750%  
5.750%  
1.000%  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2012  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
2013  
757  
80  
79  
76  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
76  
73  
235  
181  
362  
75  
363  
283  
218  
724  
69  
2018 USLIBOR 3 months +0.57%  
2020 2.125%  
2020 USLIBOR 3 months +0.75%  
2024  
2018  
2021  
2025  
-
-
-
-
1.875%  
2.375%  
2.125%  
2.875%  
825  
630  
-
Current portion (less than one year)  
-
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
INTERNATIONAL  
7,918  
4,132  
-
OTHER CONSOLIDATED  
SUBSIDIARIES  
506  
529  
308  
Total bonds after fair value hedge  
18,828  
15,227  
15,148  
286  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Bonds after  
cash flow hedge  
and fixed rate bonds  
Year of  
issue  
Amount  
after  
Amount  
after  
Amount  
after  
Currency  
Maturity  
Initial rate  
before  
hedging as of hedging as of hedging as of  
December 31, December 31, December 31,  
hedging  
instruments  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
TOTAL CAPITAL(a)  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
Bond  
2005  
2009  
2009  
2009  
2010  
2011  
2013  
-
-
701  
379  
926  
947  
379  
-
294  
744  
386  
1,016  
966  
386  
-
GBP  
EUR  
USD  
EUR  
USD  
USD  
CNY  
2012  
2019  
2021  
2024  
2020  
2021  
2018  
4.625%  
4.875%  
4.250%  
5.125%  
4.450%  
4.125%  
3.750%  
651  
363  
804  
905  
363  
128  
-
Current portion (less than one year)  
-
(294)  
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
3,214  
3,332  
3,498  
TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd.(b)  
Bond  
2013  
363  
-
-
-
-
-
USD  
USD  
2023  
2022  
2.750%  
2.875%  
Current portion (less than one year)  
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
CANADA Ltd(b)  
363  
-
-
TOTAL CAPITAL  
INTERNATIONAL(c)  
Bond  
2012  
725  
-
758  
-
-
-
Current portion (less than one year)  
Total TOTAL CAPITAL  
INTERNATIONAL(c)  
725  
758  
-
OTHER CONSOLIDATED  
SUBSIDIARIES  
106  
414  
926  
Total Bonds after cash flow hedge  
4,408  
4,504  
4,424  
(
(
(
a) TOTAL CAPITAL is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. (with the exception of one share held by each member of its Board of Directors). It acts as a financing vehicle  
for the Group. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.  
b) TOTAL CAPITAL CANADA Ltd. is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the activities of the Group in Canada. Its debt securities are fully  
and unconditionally guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.  
c) TOTAL CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the Group. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally  
guaranteed by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.  
Loan repayment schedule (excluding current portion)  
As of December 31, 2013  
Non-current of which hedging  
financial debt instruments of instruments of  
non-current non-current  
Hedging  
Non-current  
financial  
debt - net of  
%
(M)  
financial debt financial debt  
hedging  
instruments  
(liabilities)  
(assets)  
2
2
2
2
2
015  
016  
017  
018  
3,625  
3,441  
3,094  
3,386  
11,523  
3
19  
56  
37  
121  
(255)  
(157)  
(79)  
(224)  
(313)  
3,370  
3,284  
3,015  
3,162  
11,210  
14%  
14%  
12%  
13%  
47%  
019 and beyond  
Total  
25,069  
236  
(1,028)  
24,041  
100%  
As of December 31, 2012  
Non-current of which hedging  
Hedging  
financial debt instruments of instruments of  
non-current non-current  
Non-current  
financial  
debt - net of  
%
(M)  
financial debt financial debt  
hedging  
instruments  
(liabilities)  
(assets)  
2
2
2
2
2
014  
015  
016  
017  
4,163  
3,903  
2,335  
3,275  
8,598  
1
8
-
-
2
(331)  
(438)  
(210)  
(149)  
(498)  
3,832  
3,465  
2,125  
3,126  
8,100  
19%  
17%  
10%  
15%  
39%  
018 and beyond  
Total  
22,274  
11  
(1,626)  
20,648  
100%  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
287  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2011  
Non-current of which hedging  
financial debt instruments of instruments of  
non-current non-current  
Hedging  
Non-current  
financial  
debt - net of  
%
(M)  
financial debt financial debt  
hedging  
instruments  
(liabilities)  
(assets)  
2
2
2
2
2
013  
014  
015  
016  
5,021  
4,020  
4,070  
1,712  
7,734  
80  
3
6
9
48  
(529)  
(390)  
(456)  
(193)  
(408)  
4,492  
3,630  
3,614  
1,519  
7,326  
22%  
18%  
18%  
7%  
017 and beyond  
35%  
Total  
22,557  
146  
(1,976)  
20,581  
100%  
Analysis by currency and interest rate  
These analyses take into account interest rate and foreign currency swaps to hedge non-current financial debt.  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
%
2012  
%
2011  
%
U.S. dollar  
Euro  
Other currencies  
20,236  
3,542  
263  
84%  
15%  
1%  
13,685  
5,643  
1,320  
66%  
27%  
7%  
8,645  
9,582  
2,354  
42%  
47%  
11%  
Total  
24,041  
100%  
20,648  
100%  
20,581  
100%  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
%
2012  
%
2011  
%
Fixed rate  
Floating rate  
4,909  
19,132  
20%  
80%  
5,085  
15,563  
25%  
75%  
4,854  
15,727  
24%  
76%  
Total  
24,041  
100%  
20,648  
100%  
20,581  
100%  
B) Current financial assets and liabilities  
Current borrowings consist mainly of commercial papers or treasury bills or draws on bank loans. These instruments bear interest at rates  
that are close to market rates.  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
(Assets)/Liabilities  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Current financial debt(a)  
Current portion of non-current financial debt  
4,191  
3,925  
6,392  
4,624  
5,819  
3,856  
Current borrowings (Note 28)  
8,116  
11,016  
9,675  
Current portion of hedging instruments of debt (liabilities)  
Other current financial instruments (liabilities)  
228  
48  
84  
92  
40  
127  
Other current financial liabilities (Note 28)  
276  
176  
167  
Current deposits beyond three months  
Current portion of hedging instruments of debt (assets)  
Other current financial instruments (assets)  
(117)  
(340)  
(79)  
(1,093)  
(430)  
(39)  
(101)  
(383)  
(216)  
Current financial assets (Note 28)  
(536)  
(1,562)  
9,630  
(700)  
Current borrowings and related financial assets and liabilities, net  
7,856  
9,142  
(
a) As of December 31, 2011 and as of December 31, 2010, the current financial debt includes a commercial paper program in Total Capital Canada Ltd. Total Capital Canada Ltd.  
is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of TOTAL S.A. It acts as a financing vehicle for the activities of the Group in Canada. Its debt securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed  
by TOTAL S.A. as to payment of principal, premium, if any, interest and any other amounts due.  
288  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
C) Net-debt-to-equity ratio  
For its internal and external communication needs, the Group calculates a debt ratio by dividing its net financial debt by equity. Adjusted  
shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2013 is calculated after payment of a dividend of 2.38 per share, subject to approval  
by the shareholders’ meeting on May 16, 2014.  
The net-debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
(Assets)/Liabilities  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Current borrowings  
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Net financial assets and liabilities held for sale or exchange  
Non-current financial debt  
Hedging instruments on non-current financial debt  
Cash and cash equivalents  
8,116  
276  
(536)  
11,016  
176  
(1,562)  
756  
22,274  
(1,626)  
(15,469)  
9,675  
167  
(700)  
(130)  
-
25,069  
(1,028)  
(14,647)  
22,557  
(1,976)  
(14,025)  
Net financial debt  
17,120  
15,565  
15,698  
Shareholders’ equity – Group share  
Distribution of the income based on existing shares at the closing date  
Non-controlling interests  
72,629  
(1,362)  
2,281  
71,185  
(1,299)  
1,280  
66,945  
(1,255)  
1,352  
Adjusted shareholders’ equity  
Net-debt-to-equity ratio  
73,548  
23.3%  
71,166  
21.9%  
67,042  
23.4%  
21) Other creditors and accrued liabilities  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Accruals and deferred income  
Payable to States (including taxes and duties)  
Payroll  
217  
6,523  
1,140  
5,941  
240  
7,426  
1,128  
5,904  
231  
8,040  
1,062  
5,441  
Other operating liabilities  
Total  
13,821  
14,698  
14,774  
As of December 31, 2013, the heading “Other operating liabilities” includes mainly the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2013  
for 1,361 million. This interim dividend will be paid in March 2014.  
As of December 31, 2012, the heading “Other operating liabilities” included mainly the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2012  
for 1,366 million. This interim dividend was paid in March 2013.  
As of December 31, 2011, the heading “Other operating liabilities” included mainly the third quarterly interim dividend for the fiscal year 2011  
for 1,317 million. This interim dividend was paid in March 2012.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
289  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
22) Lease contracts  
The Group leases real estate, retail stations, ships, and other equipments (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
The future minimum lease payments on operating and finance leases to which the Group is committed are shown as follows:  
For the year ended December 31, 2013  
(M)  
Operating leases  
Finance leases  
2
2
2
2
2
2
014  
015  
016  
017  
807  
657  
600  
459  
361  
52  
51  
48  
17  
17  
018  
019 and beyond  
1,174  
206  
Total minimum payments  
4,058  
391  
(82)  
309  
(29)  
280  
Less financial expenses  
Nominal value of contracts  
Less current portion of finance lease contracts  
Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts  
For the year ended December 31, 2012  
(M)  
Operating leases  
Finance leases  
2
2
2
2
2
2
013  
014  
015  
016  
781  
569  
514  
441  
337  
971  
55  
54  
53  
51  
19  
017  
018 and beyond  
236  
Total minimum payments  
3,613  
468  
(108)  
360  
(27)  
Less financial expenses  
Nominal value of contracts  
Less current portion of finance lease contracts  
Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts  
333  
For the year ended December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Operating leases  
Finance leases  
2
2
2
2
2
2
012  
013  
014  
015  
762  
552  
416  
335  
316  
940  
41  
40  
37  
36  
34  
20  
016  
017 and beyond  
Total minimum payments  
3,321  
208  
(31)  
177  
(25)  
152  
Less financial expenses  
Nominal value of contracts  
Less current portion of finance lease contracts  
Outstanding liability of finance lease contracts  
Net rental expense incurred under operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2013 is 848 million (against 780 million in 2012 and  
645 million in 2011).  
290  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
23) Commitments and contingencies  
As of December 31, 2013  
Maturity and installments  
(M)  
Total  
Less than Between 1  
year and 5 years  
More than  
5 years  
1
Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Finance lease obligations (Note 22)  
23,761  
3,784  
309  
-
12,721  
-
11,040  
-
3,784  
29  
110  
170  
Asset retirement obligations (Note 19)  
9,287  
533  
1,717  
7,037  
Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet  
37,141  
4,346  
14,548  
18,247  
Operating lease obligations (Note 22)  
4,058  
807  
2,077  
1,174  
Purchase obligations  
86,275  
14,546  
24,663  
47,066  
Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet  
Total of contractual obligations  
90,333  
15,353  
19,699  
26,740  
41,288  
48,240  
66,487  
127,474  
Guarantees given for excise taxes  
Guarantees given against borrowings  
Indemnities related to sales of businesses  
Guarantees of current liabilities  
Guarantees to customers/suppliers  
Letters of credit  
1,772  
6,001  
232  
1,485  
80  
74  
2,687  
98  
169  
138  
163  
696  
213  
3,234  
129  
267  
1,853  
197  
5
89  
1,537  
1,351  
989  
525  
3,528  
1,711  
3,043  
Other operating commitments  
1,358  
Total of other commitments given  
16,812  
5,536  
4,025  
7,251  
Mortgages and liens received  
Sales obligations  
Other commitments received  
282  
98,226  
5,941  
15  
7,625  
3,211  
1
28,063  
1,269  
266  
62,538  
1,461  
Total of commitments received  
104,449  
10,851  
29,333  
64,265  
Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures  
8,086  
71  
401  
7,614  
As of December 31, 2012  
Maturity and installments  
(M)  
Total  
Less than Between 1  
year and 5 years  
More than  
5 years  
1
Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Finance lease obligations (Note 22)  
20,315  
4,251  
360  
-
12,405  
-
143  
1,429  
7,910  
-
190  
5,788  
4,251  
27  
407  
Asset retirement obligations (Note 19)  
7,624  
Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet  
32,550  
4,685  
13,977  
13,888  
Operating lease obligations (Note 22)  
3,613  
781  
1,861  
971  
Purchase obligations  
83,219  
12,005  
21,088  
50,126  
Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet  
Total of contractual obligations  
86,832  
12,786  
17,471  
22,949  
36,926  
51,097  
64,985  
119,382  
Guarantees given for excise taxes  
Guarantees given against borrowings  
Indemnities related to sales of businesses  
Guarantees of current liabilities  
Guarantees to customers/suppliers  
Letters of credit  
1,675  
3,952  
193  
1,507  
117  
4
133  
1,982  
1,785  
753  
70  
2,695  
49  
105  
113  
252  
702  
98  
1,140  
140  
165  
1,491  
261  
403  
3,586  
2,298  
2,659  
Other operating commitments  
1,204  
Total of other commitments given  
14,766  
6,281  
3,986  
4,499  
Mortgages and liens received  
Sales obligations  
Other commitments received  
435  
80,514  
5,564  
117  
7,416  
3,465  
8
26,137  
859  
310  
46,961  
1,240  
Total of commitments received  
86,513  
10,998  
27,004  
48,511  
Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures  
7,011  
-
145  
6,866  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
291  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2011  
Maturity and installments  
(M)  
Total  
Less than Between 1  
year and 5 years  
More than  
5 years  
1
Non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Current portion of non-current debt obligations net of hedging instruments (Note 20)  
Finance lease obligations (Note 22)  
20,429  
3,488  
177  
-
13,121  
-
7,308  
-
18  
5,808  
3,488  
25  
272  
134  
804  
Asset retirement obligations (Note 19)  
6,884  
Contractual obligations recorded in the balance sheet  
30,978  
3,785  
14,059  
13,134  
Operating lease obligations (Note 22)  
3,321  
762  
1,619  
940  
Purchase obligations  
77,353  
11,049  
20,534  
45,770  
Contractual obligations not recorded in the balance sheet  
Total of contractual obligations  
80,674  
11,811  
15,596  
22,153  
36,212  
46,710  
59,844  
111,652  
Guarantees given for excise taxes  
Guarantees given against borrowings  
Indemnities related to sales of businesses  
Guarantees of current liabilities  
Guarantees to customers/suppliers  
Letters of credit  
1,765  
4,778  
39  
1,594  
1,027  
-
73  
2,797  
34  
35  
57  
301  
697  
98  
954  
5
376  
262  
79  
3,265  
2,408  
2,477  
1,634  
1,898  
433  
1,574  
209  
1,347  
Other operating commitments  
Total of other commitments given  
15,108  
6,848  
3,994  
4,266  
Mortgages and liens received  
Sales obligations  
Other commitments received  
408  
62,216  
6,740  
7
4,221  
4,415  
119  
17,161  
757  
282  
40,834  
1,568  
Total of commitments received  
69,364  
8,643  
18,037  
42,684  
Of which commitments given relating to joint ventures  
-
-
-
-
A) Contractual obligations  
Debt obligations  
Asset retirement obligations  
This item represents the discounted present value of Upstream  
asset retirement obligations, primarily asset removal costs at the  
completion date. The information regarding contractual obligations  
linked to asset retirement obligations is presented in Notes 1Q and  
19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Non-current debt obligations” are included in the items  
Non-current financial debt” and “Hedging instruments of  
non-current financial debt” of the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  
It includes the non-current portion of swaps hedging bonds, and  
excludes non-current finance lease obligations of 280 million.  
Purchase obligations  
The current portion of non-current debt is included in the items  
Purchase obligations are obligations under contractual agreements  
to purchase goods or services, including capital projects. These  
obligations are enforceable and legally binding on the Company  
and specify all significant terms, including the amount and the  
timing of the payments.  
“Current borrowings”, “Current financial assets” and “Other current  
financial liabilities” of the Consolidated Balance Sheet. It includes  
the current portion of swaps hedging bonds, and excludes the  
current portion of finance lease obligations of 29 million.  
The information regarding contractual obligations linked to  
indebtedness is presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements.  
These obligations mainly include: hydrocarbon unconditional  
purchase contracts (except where an active, highly-liquid market  
exists and when the hydrocarbons are expected to be re-sold  
shortly after purchase), reservation of transport capacities in  
pipelines, unconditional exploration works and development works  
in the Upstream segment, and contracts for capital investment  
projects in the Refining & Chemicals segment.  
Lease contracts  
The information regarding operating and finance leases is  
presented in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
292  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
B) Other commitments given  
Indemnities related to sales of businesses  
In the ordinary course of business, the Group executes contracts  
involving standard indemnities in oil industry and indemnities specific  
to transactions such as sales of businesses. These indemnities  
might include claims against any of the following: environmental,  
tax and shareholder matters, intellectual property rights, governmental  
regulations and employment-related matters, dealer, supplier, and  
other commercial contractual relationships. Performance under  
these indemnities would generally be triggered by a breach of  
terms of the contract or by a third party claim. The Group regularly  
evaluates the probability of having to incur costs associated with  
these indemnities.  
Guarantees given for excise taxes  
They consist of guarantees given to other oil and gas companies in  
order to comply with French tax authorities’ requirements for oil and  
gas imports in France. A payment would be triggered by a failure  
of the guaranteed party with respect to the French tax authorities.  
The default of the guaranteed parties is however considered to be  
highly remote by the Group.  
Guarantees given against borrowings  
The Group guarantees bank debt and finance lease obligations of  
certain non-consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates. Maturity  
dates vary, and guarantees will terminate on payment and/or  
cancellation of the obligation. A payment would be triggered by  
failure of the guaranteed party to fulfill its obligation covered by the  
guarantee, and no assets are held as collateral for these  
guarantees. As of December 31, 2013, the maturities of these  
guarantees are up to 2028.  
The guarantees related to antitrust investigations granted as part  
of the agreement relating to the spin-off of Arkema are described  
in Note 32 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Other guarantees given  
Non-consolidated subsidiaries  
The Group also guarantees the current liabilities of certain non-  
consolidated subsidiaries. Performance under these guarantees  
would be triggered by a financial default of the entity.  
Guarantees given against borrowings include the guarantee given in  
2008 by TOTAL S.A. in connection with the financing of the Yemen  
LNG project for an amount of 528 million.  
Operating agreements  
In 2010, TOTAL S.A. provided guarantees in connection with the  
financing of the Jubail project (operated by SAUDI ARAMCO  
TOTAL Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP)) of up to  
As part of normal ongoing business operations and consistent  
with generally and accepted recognized industry practices, the Group  
enters into numerous agreements with other parties.  
These commitments are often entered into for commercial purposes,  
for regulatory purposes or for other operating agreements.  
2,311 million, proportional to TOTAL’s share in the project  
(37.5%). In addition, TOTAL S.A. provided in 2010 a guarantee in  
favor of its partner in the Jubail project (Saudi Arabian Oil Company)  
with respect to Total Refining Saudi Arabia SAS’s obligations under  
the shareholders agreement with respect to SATORP. As of  
December 31, 2013, this guarantee is of up to 892 million and  
has been recorded under “Other operating commitments”.  
C) Commitments received  
Sales obligations  
In 2013, TOTAL S.A. provided guarantees in connection with the  
financing of the Ichthys LNG project for an amount of  
These amounts represent binding obligations under contractual  
agreements to sell goods, including in particular hydrocarbon  
unconditional sale contracts (except when an active, highly-liquid  
market exists and volumes are re-sold shortly after purchase).  
2,218 million.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
293  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
24) Related parties  
The main transactions and balances with related parties (principally non-consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates) are detailed as  
follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Balance sheet  
Receivables  
Debtors and other debtors  
Loans (excl. loans to equity affiliates)  
Payables  
613  
341  
646  
383  
585  
331  
Creditors and other creditors  
Debts  
876  
13  
713  
9
724  
31  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Statement of Income  
Sales  
Purchases  
Financial expense  
Financial income  
3,865  
5,475  
-
3,959  
5,721  
-
4,400  
5,508  
-
105  
106  
79  
Compensation for the administration and management bodies  
The aggregate amount of direct and indirect compensation accounted for by the French and foreign affiliates of the Company for the  
executive officers of TOTAL (the members of the Management Committee and the Treasurer) and for the members of the Board of Directors  
who are employees of the Group, is detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Number of people  
31  
34  
30  
Direct or indirect compensation received  
Pension expenses(a)  
Other long-term benefits expenses  
Termination benefits expenses  
Share-based payments expense (IFRS 2)(b)  
22.1  
10.0  
-
21.3  
12.5  
-
20.4  
6.3  
-
4.8  
10.2  
-
-
11.8  
10.6  
(
a) The benefits provided for executive officers and certain members of the Board of Directors, employees and former employees of the Group, include severance to be paid on retirement,  
supplementary pension schemes and insurance plans, which represent 188.7 million provisioned as of December 31, 2013 (against 181.3 million as of December 31, 2012 and  
139.7 million as of December 31, 2011).  
(b) Share-based payments expense computed for the executive officers and the members of the Board of Directors who are employees of the Group as described in Note 25 paragraph E  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and based on the principles of IFRS 2 “Share-based payments” described in Note 1 paragraph E to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
The compensation allocated to members of the Board of Directors for directors’ fees totaled 1.25 million in 2013 (1.10 million in 2012  
and 1.07 million in 2011).  
294  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
25) Share-based payments  
A) TOTAL share subscription option plans  
Weighted  
average  
exercise  
2003 Plan 2004 Plan 2005 Plan 2006 Plan 2007 Plan 2008 Plan 2009 Plan 2010 Plan 2011 Plan  
Total  
price ()  
Date of the  
Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of the award(a)  
Exercise price  
05/17/2001 05/14/2004 05/14/2004 05/14/2004 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/21/2010 05/21/2010  
07/16/2003 07/20/2004 07/19/2005 07/18/2006 07/17/2007 10/09/2008 09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011  
until May 23, 2006 included ()(b) 33.30  
39.85  
39.30  
49.73  
49.04  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Exercise price  
since May 24, 2006 ()(b)  
32.84  
50.60  
60.10  
42.90  
39.90  
38.20  
33.00  
Expiry date  
07/16/2011 07/20/2012 07/19/2013 07/18/2014 07/17/2015 10/09/2016 09/15/2017 09/14/2018 09/14/2019  
Number of options(b)  
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2011  
5,734,444 12,338,847 6,178,856 5,640,886 5,866,445 4,349,158 4,371,890 4,787,300  
-
49,267,826  
43.80  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
(738,534)  
-
(28,208)  
-
(16,320)  
-
-
(17,380)  
-
-
(16,080)  
-
-
(13,260)  
(200)  
-
(14,090)  
-
-
(85,217)  
(2,040)  
1,518,840 1,518,840  
(1,000) (930,089)  
(9,400) (5,223,665)  
33.00  
34.86  
33.11  
Exercised  
(4,995,910)  
(216,115)  
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2012  
-
12,094,524 6,162,536 5,623,506 5,850,365 4,335,698 4,357,800 4,700,043 1,508,440 44,632,912  
44.87  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
-
-
(2,516)  
-
-
(1,980)  
-
-
(1,380)  
-
-
(3,600)  
(1,630)  
-
(2,700)  
-
(4,140)  
-
-
-
39.31  
39.28  
- (11,351,931)  
(3,400) (11,371,647)  
(798,883)  
Exercised  
-
(742,593)  
(20,200)  
(34,460)  
-
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2013  
-
-
6,160,020 5,621,526 5,848,985 4,330,468 4,334,900 4,661,443 1,505,040 32,462,382  
46.96  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(6,159,390)  
(630)  
-
(900)  
-
-
(1,020)  
-
-
(360)  
-
(1,080)  
-
(720)  
-
-
-
-
49.04  
37.37  
(6,163,470)  
Exercised  
(110,910)  
(344,442)  
(122,871)  
(363,946) (942,799)  
Existing options  
as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
-
5,620,626 5,847,965 4,219,198 3,989,378 4,537,852 1,141,094 25,356,113  
46.82  
(
(
a) The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the share subscription options, except for the grant of October 9, 2008, decided by the Board on September 9, 2008.  
b) In order to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006, the exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares of the plans in force at that date were multiplied by 0.25  
and the number of options awarded, outstanding, canceled or exercised before May 23, 2006 included was multiplied by four. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise  
prices of TOTAL subscription shares of these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006.  
(
c) Out of the options canceled in 2011, 2012 and 2013, 738,534 options that were not exercised expired on July 16, 2011 due to the expiry of the 2003 Plan, 11,351,931 options that were  
not exercised expired on July 20, 2012 due to the expiry of the 2004 Plan and 6,158,662 options that were not exercised expired on July 19, 2013 due to the expiry of the 2005 Plan.  
Options are exercisable, subject to a continuous employment  
condition, after a 2-year period from the date of the Board meeting  
awarding the options and expire eight years after this date. The  
underlying shares may not be transferred during four years from the  
date of grant. For the 2007 to 2011 Plans, the 4-year transfer  
restriction period does not apply to employees of non-French  
subsidiaries as of the date of the grant, who may transfer the  
underlying shares after a 2-year period from the date of the grant.  
The performance condition states that the number of options finally  
granted is based on the average of the Return on Equity (ROE)  
of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group from  
the Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income  
of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012.  
The acquisition rate:  
– is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
Since the 2011 Plan, no new TOTAL share subscription option plan  
or TOTAL share purchase plan was decided.  
– varies on straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal  
to 18%.  
2011 Plan  
For the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for each  
grantee other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the  
options will be finally granted to their beneficiary provided that the  
performance condition is fulfilled.  
In addition, as part of the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors  
decided that the number of share subscription options finally  
awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be  
subject to two performance conditions:  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
295  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the  
– For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the  
performance condition states that the number of options finally  
granted is based on the average of the Return on Average  
Capital Employed (ROACE) of the Group. The average ROACE  
is calculated by the Group from the Consolidated Balance Sheet  
and Statement of Income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and  
2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE  
is less than or equal to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis  
between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 6%  
and less than 15%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE  
is more than or equal to 15%.  
performance condition states that the number of options finally  
granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average  
ROE is calculated by the Group from the Consolidated Balance  
Sheet and Statement of Income of the Group for fiscal years  
2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROE is less than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line  
basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than  
7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROE  
is more than or equal to 18%.  
B) TOTAL performance share grants  
2009 Plan  
2010 Plan  
2011 Plan  
2012 Plan  
2013 Plan  
Total  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of the award  
Date of the final award (end of the vesting period)  
Transfer authorized as from  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/13/2011 05/13/2011 05/13/2011  
09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
09/16/2011 09/15/2012 09/15/2013 07/27/2014 07/26/2016  
09/16/2013 09/15/2014 09/15/2015 07/27/2016 07/26/2018  
Number of performance shares  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011  
2,954,336 3,000,637  
-
-
-
5,954,973  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
3,649,770  
(19,579)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,649,770  
(56,543)  
(26,214)  
(2,928,122)  
(10,750)  
(1,836)  
- (2,929,958)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
-
2,988,051 3,630,191  
-
-
6,618,242  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
4,295,930  
-
-
4,295,930  
(50,673)  
832  
(32,650)  
(18,855)  
(5,530)  
-
-
(832) (2,955,401)  
- (2,961,763)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
-
-
-
3,605,806 4,295,930  
-
7,901,736  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,464,200 4,464,200  
(14,970)  
(3,590,836)  
(17,340)  
(180)  
(3,810)  
(36,120)  
- (3,591,016)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
4,278,410 4,460,390 8,738,800  
The performance shares, which are bought back by the Company  
on the market, are finally granted to their beneficiaries after a 3-year  
vesting period for the 2013 Plan and a 2-year vesting period for the  
previous plans, from the date of the grant. The final grant is subject  
to a continued employment condition and a performance condition.  
Moreover, the transfer of the performance shares finally granted will  
not be permitted until the end of a 2-year holding period from the  
date of the final grant.  
– is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other  
than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior  
executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before.  
In addition, as part of the 2013 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of  
performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
2013 Plan  
For the 2013 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior  
executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer),  
the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued  
employment condition and a performance condition. The  
performance condition states that the number of shares finally  
granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average  
ROE is calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated  
balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2013,  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group  
from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of  
the Group for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition  
rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to  
8%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%; and is equal  
to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.  
2
014 and 2015. The acquisition rate:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
296  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income of the Group for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015.  
The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less  
than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 7%  
and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than  
ROE is calculated by the Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated  
balance sheet and statement of income for fiscal years 2011 and  
2012. The acquisition rate:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
1
5%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than  
– varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and  
or equal to 15%.  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal  
to 18%.  
2012 Plan  
For the 2012 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior  
executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer),  
the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment  
condition and a performance condition. The performance condition  
states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the  
average ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the  
Group based on TOTAL’s consolidated balance sheet and statement  
of income for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate:  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary  
(other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior  
executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before.  
In addition, as part of the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number  
of performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
– For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group  
from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income of  
the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is  
equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average  
ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%; and is equal to 100%  
if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other  
than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior  
executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before.  
In addition, as part of the 2012 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of  
performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
– For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by the  
Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of  
income of the Group for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition  
rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal  
to 6%; varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100%  
if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than 15%;  
and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal  
to 15%.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group. The average ROE is calculated by the Group  
from the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income  
of the Group for fiscal years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is more than 8% and less than 16%; and is equal  
to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.  
Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition  
rate was 100% for the 2011 Plan. As a reminder, the acquisition  
rates were 100% for the 2009 and 2010 plans.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group. The average ROACE is calculated by  
the Group from the consolidated balance sheet and statement  
of income of the Group for fiscal years 2012 and 2013.  
The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less  
than or equal to 7%; varies on a straight-line basis between 7%  
and 100% if the average ROACE is more than 7% and less than  
C) Global free TOTAL share plan  
The Board of Directors approved at its meeting on May 21, 2010,  
the implementation and conditions of a global free share plan  
intended for the Group’s employees (employees of TOTAL S.A.  
or companies in which TOTAL S.A. holds directly or indirectly an  
interest of more than 50%). On June 30, 2010, entitlement rights  
to twenty-five free shares were granted to every employee.  
1
5%; and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than  
The final grant is subject to a continued employment condition  
during the plan’s vesting period. Depending on the country in which  
the companies of the Group are located, the acquisition period is  
either two years followed by a conservation period of two years  
or equal to 15%.  
2
011 Plan  
(for the countries with a 2+2 structure), or four years without any  
For the 2011 Plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior  
executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer),  
the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued  
employment condition and a performance condition. The  
performance condition states that the number of shares finally  
granted is based on the average ROE of the Group. The average  
conservation period (for the countries with a 4+0 structure).  
Following the vesting period, the shares awarded will be new  
shares, issued from an increase of capital of TOTAL S.A.,  
by incorporation of paid-in surplus or retained earnings.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
297  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer acknowledged on July 2, 2012, the issuance and the award of 1,366,950 shares to the  
beneficiaries designated at the end of the 2-year acquisition period.  
2
010 Plan  
2010 Plan  
(4 + 0)  
Total  
(2 + 2)  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of the award(a)  
Date of the final award  
Transfer authorized as from  
Number of free shares  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008  
06/30/2010 06/30/2010  
07/01/2012 07/01/2014  
07/01/2014 07/01/2014  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011  
1,508,650  
1,070,575  
2,579,225  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
(83,800)  
(900)  
(29,175)  
(475)  
(54,625)  
(425)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
1,479,000  
1,015,525  
2,494,525  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted(b)  
-
(111,725)  
(1,367,275)  
-
-
(40,275)  
(152,000)  
(350) (1,367,625)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
-
974,900  
974,900  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
100  
(100)  
-
(101,150)  
(275)  
-
(101,050)  
(375)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
873,475  
873,475  
(
a) The June 30, 2010, grant was decided by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.  
(b) Final grant of 1,366,950 shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end of the acquisition period.  
D) SunPower plans  
automatic annual increase effective December 30, 2013, shares  
available for grant will increase to approximately 7.6 million.  
No new awards are being granted under the 1996 Plan or the  
PowerLight Plan.  
SunPower has three stock incentive plans: the 1996 Stock Plan  
(“1996 Plan”), the Third Amended and Restated 2005 SunPower  
Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”) and the PowerLight  
Corporation Common Stock Option and Common Stock Purchase  
Plan (“PowerLight Plan”). The PowerLight Plan was assumed by  
SunPower by way of the acquisition of PowerLight in fiscal 2007.  
Under the terms of all three plans, SunPower may issue incentive  
or non-statutory stock options or stock purchase rights to directors,  
employees and consultants to purchase common stock. The 2005  
Plan was adopted by SunPower’s Board of Directors in August 2005,  
and was approved by shareholders in November 2005. The 2005  
Plan replaced the 1996 Plan and allows not only for the grant of  
options, but also for the grant of stock appreciation rights,  
restricted stock grants, restricted stock units and other equity  
rights. The 2005 Plan also allows for tax withholding obligations  
related to stock option exercises or restricted stock awards to be  
satisfied through the retention of shares otherwise released upon  
vesting. The PowerLight Plan was adopted by PowerLight’s Board  
of Directors in October 2000.  
Incentive stock options may be granted at no less than the fair  
value of the common stock on the date of grant. Non-statutory  
stock options and stock purchase rights may be granted at no  
less than 85% of the fair value of the common stock at the date  
of grant. The options and rights become exercisable when and as  
determined by SunPower’s Board of Directors, although these  
terms generally do not exceed ten years for stock options. Under  
the 1996 and 2005 Plans, the options typically vest over five years  
with a one-year cliff and monthly vesting thereafter. Under the  
PowerLight Plan, the options typically vest over five years with  
yearly cliff vesting. Under the 2005 Plan, the restricted stock grants  
and restricted stock units typically vest in three equal installments  
annually over three years.  
The majority of shares issued are net of the minimum statutory  
withholding requirements that SunPower pays on behalf of its  
employees. During fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, the Company  
withheld 1,329,140 shares, 905,953 shares, and 221,262 shares,  
respectively, to satisfy the employees’ tax obligations. SunPower  
pays such withholding requirements in cash to the appropriate  
taxing authorities. Shares withheld are treated as common stock  
repurchases for accounting and disclosure purposes and reduce  
the number of shares outstanding upon vesting.  
In May 2008, SunPower’s stockholders approved an automatic  
annual increase available for grant under the 2005 Plan, beginning  
in fiscal 2009. The automatic annual increase is equal to the lower  
of three percent of the outstanding shares of all classes of SunPower’s  
common stock measured on the last day of the immediately preceding  
fiscal quarter, 6.0 million shares, or such other number of shares as  
determined by SunPower’s Board of Directors. Subsequent to the  
298  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The following table summarizes SunPower’s stock option activities:  
Outstanding Stock Options  
Shares  
in thousands)  
Weighted-Average  
Exercise Price  
Per Share  
Weighted-Average  
Remaining  
Contractual Term  
(in years)  
Aggregate  
Intrinsic  
Value  
(in thousands dollars)  
(
(in dollars)  
Outstanding as of July 3, 2011  
519  
25.39  
Exercised  
Forfeited  
(29)  
(6)  
3.93  
31.29  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
484  
26.62  
4.71  
480  
Exercisable as of January 1, 2012  
Expected to vest after January 1, 2012  
441  
40  
24.52  
48.08  
4.53  
6.64  
480  
-
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
484  
26.62  
Exercised  
Forfeited  
(20)  
(70)  
2.59  
24.17  
Outstanding as of December 30, 2012  
Exercisable as of December 30, 2012  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
394  
394  
394  
28.27  
28.27  
28.27  
3.51  
310  
3.51  
310  
Exercised  
Forfeited  
(48)  
(26)  
3.24  
42.25  
Outstanding as of December 29, 2013  
320  
30.87  
2.78  
3,269  
Exercisable as of December 29, 2013  
320  
30.87  
2.78  
3,269  
The intrinsic value of options exercised in 2013, 2012, and 2011 were $0.8 million, $0.1 million, and $0.3 million, respectively. There were no  
stock options granted in 2013, 2012, and in the second half of 2011.  
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on the closing stock price of $28.91 at  
December 29, 2013, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.  
The total number of in-the-money options exercisable was 0.2 million shares as of December 29, 2013.  
The following table summarizes SunPower’s non-vested stock options and restricted stock activities thereafter:  
Stock Options  
Restricted Stock Awards and Units  
Shares  
in thousands)  
Weighted-Average  
Exercise Price  
Per Share  
Shares  
(in thousands)  
Weighted-Average  
Grant Date Fair  
Value Per Share  
(in dollars)(a)  
(
(in dollars)  
Outstanding as of July 3, 2011  
67  
41.34  
7,198  
16.03  
Granted  
Vested(b)  
Forfeited  
-
(19)  
(5)  
-
28.73  
31.29  
2,336  
(691)  
(1,473)  
6.91  
18.96  
14.10  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011  
43  
48.33  
7,370  
13.25  
Granted  
Vested(b)  
Forfeited  
-
(30)  
(13)  
-
57.79  
24.72  
5,638  
(2,845)  
(1,587)  
5.93  
13.94  
11.52  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012  
-
8,576  
8.53  
Granted  
Vested(b)  
Forfeited  
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,607  
(3,583)  
(1,008)  
15.88  
9.48  
10.10  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
9,592  
12.26  
(
(
a) The Company estimates the fair value of the restricted stock unit awards as the stock price on the grant date.  
b) Restricted stock awards and units vested include shares withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
299  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
E) Share-based payment expense  
 133 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans; and  
 2 million for SunPower plans.  
Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2013  
amounts to 216 million and is broken down as follows:  
Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2011  
3 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;  
128 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans;  
74 million for SunPower plans; and  
amounted to 178 million and was broken down as follows:  
 27 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;  
 134 million for TOTAL restricted shares plans; and  
 17 million for SunPower plans.  
11 million for the capital increase reserved for employees  
(
see Note 17).  
The fair value of the options granted in 2011 has been measured  
according to the Black-Scholes method and based on the following  
assumptions:  
Share-based payment expense before tax for the year 2012  
amounted to 148 million and was broken down as follows:  
13 million for TOTAL share subscription plans;  
For the year ended December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Risk free interest rate (%)(a)  
Expected dividends (%)(b)  
Expected volatility (%)(c)  
Vesting period (years)  
Exercise period (years)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.0  
5.6  
27.5  
2
8
4.4  
Fair value of the granted options ( per option)  
(
(
(
a) Zero coupon euro swap rate at 6 years.  
b) The expected dividends are based on the price of TOTAL share derivatives traded on the markets.  
c) The expected volatility is based on the implied volatility of TOTAL share options and of share indices options traded on the markets.  
In 2013 and 2012 no new TOTAL share subscription option plan  
was decided.  
cost in two steps consisting, first, in a five years forward sale  
of the nontransferable shares, and second, in purchasing the same  
number of shares in cash with a loan financing reimbursable  
The cost of capital increases reserved for employees is reduced to  
take into account the non transferability of the shares that could be  
subscribed by the employees over a period of five years. The valuation  
method of non transferability of the shares is based on a strategy  
“in fine”. During 2011, the main assumptions used for the valuation  
of the cost of capital increase reserved for employees were  
the following:  
For the year ended December 31,  
2011  
Date of the Board of Directors meeting that decided the issue  
Subscription price ()  
October 28, 2010  
34.80  
41.60  
8.90  
2.82  
7.23  
17.6  
Share price at the reference date ()(a)  
Number of shares (in millions)  
Risk free interest rate (%)(b)  
Employees’ loan financing rate (%)(c)  
Non transferability cost (% of the reference’s share price)  
(
(
(
a) Share price at the date which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer decided the subscription period.  
b) Zero coupon euro swap rate at 5 years.  
c) The employees’ loan financing rate is based on a 5 year consumer’s credit rate.  
Due to the fact that the non transferability cost was higher than  
the discount, no cost has been accounted in 2011.  
Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, during its  
September 18, 2012 meeting, decided to proceed with a capital  
increase reserved for employees that included a classic offer and a  
leveraged offer depending on the employees’ choice, within the  
limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012.  
This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215  
shares with a par value of 2.5 at a unit price of 30.70. The  
issuance of the shares was acknowledged on April 25, 2013.  
The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012 delegated to the  
Board of Directors, in its seventeenth resolution, the authority to  
carry out in one or more occasions within a maximum period of  
twenty-six months, a capital increase reserved for employees  
belonging to an employee savings plan.  
This same Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012 also  
delegated to the Board of Directors the powers necessary to  
accomplish in one or more occasions within a maximum period of  
eighteen months, a capital increase with the objective of providing  
employees with their registered office located outside France with  
benefits comparable to those granted to the employees included  
in the seventeenth resolution of the Combined General Meeting of  
May 11, 2012.  
The cost of the capital increase reserved for employees consists  
of the cost related to the discount on all the shares subscribed using  
both the classic and the leveraged schemes, and the opportunity  
gain for the shares subscribed using the leveraged scheme. This  
opportunity gain corresponds to the benefit of subscribing to the  
leveraged offer, rather than reproducing the same economic profile  
through the purchase of options in the market for individual investors.  
300  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The global cost is reduced to take into account the non  
transferability of the shares that could be subscribed by the  
employees over a period of five years. The valuation method of non  
transferability of the shares is based on a strategy cost in two steps  
consisting, first, in a five years forward sale of the nontransferable  
shares, and second, in purchasing the same number of shares in  
cash with a loan financing reimbursable “in fine”.  
During the year 2013, the main assumptions used for the valuation of  
the cost of the capital increase reserved for employees were the  
following:  
For the year ended December 31,  
2013  
Date of the Board of Directors meeting that decided the issue  
Subscription price ()(a)  
September 18, 2012  
30.70  
39.57  
10.80  
0.88  
Share price at the reference date ()(b)  
Number of shares (in millions)  
Risk free interest rate (%)(c)  
Employees’ loan financing rate (%)(d)  
6.97  
Non transferability cost (% of the reference’s share price)  
22.1  
(
a) Average of the closing TOTAL share prices during the twenty trading days prior to March 14, 2013, date on which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer set the subscription period,  
after deduction of a 20% discount.  
(
(
(
b) Share price on March 14, 2013, date on which the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer set the subscription period.  
c) Zero coupon euro swap rate at 5 years.  
d) The employees’ loan financing rate is based on a 5 year consumer’s credit rate.  
A cost of 10.6 million related to the capital increase reserved for employees has been accounted to the fiscal year 2013.  
26) Payroll and staff  
For the year ended December 31,  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Personnel expenses (M)  
Wages and salaries (including social charges)  
7,096  
7,135  
6,579  
Group Employees  
France  
Management  
Other  
11,189  
22,010  
11,347  
23,656  
11,123  
23,914  
International  
Management  
Other  
17,338  
48,262  
16,307  
45,816  
15,713  
45,354  
Total  
98,799  
97,126  
96,104  
The number of employees includes only employees of fully consolidated subsidiaries.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
301  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
27) Statement of cash flows  
A) Cash flow from operating activities  
The following table gives additional information on cash paid or received in the cash flow from operating activities:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Interests paid  
(538)  
57  
(10,322)  
2,107  
(694)  
73  
(13,067)  
2,419  
(679)  
277  
(12,061)  
2,133  
Interests received  
Income tax paid(a)  
Dividends received  
(a) These amounts include taxes paid in kind under production-sharing contracts in the Exploration & Production.  
Changes in working capital are detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Inventories  
812  
2,396  
(1,264)  
130  
372  
767  
(226)  
345  
(1,845)  
(1,287)  
(2,409)  
2,646  
Accounts receivable  
Other current assets  
Accounts payable  
Other creditors and accrued liabilities  
(144)  
(174)  
1,156  
Net amount  
1,930  
1,084  
(1,739)  
B) Cash flow used in financing activities  
Changes in non-current financial debt are detailed in the following table under a net value due to the high number of multiple drawings:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Issuance of non-current debt  
Repayment of non-current debt  
8,448  
(89)  
5,539  
(260)  
4,234  
(165)  
Net amount  
8,359  
5,279  
4,069  
C) Cash and cash equivalents  
Cash and cash equivalents are detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Cash  
Cash equivalents  
9,351  
5,296  
6,202  
9,267  
4,715  
9,310  
Total  
14,647  
15,469  
14,025  
Cash equivalents are mainly composed of deposits less than three months deposited in government institutions or deposit banks selected  
in accordance with strict criteria.  
302  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
28) Financial assets and liabilities analysis per instruments class and strategy  
The financial assets and liabilities disclosed in the balance sheet are detailed as follows:  
As of December 31, 2013  
M)  
Financial instruments related to financing and operational activities  
Other  
financial  
instruments  
Total  
Fair  
value  
(
Amortized cost  
Fair value  
Available  
for sale(  
Held  
for  
trading  
Financial  
debt  
Hedging  
of financial  
debt  
Cash Net  
flow investment  
a)  
(b)  
hedge  
hedge  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
and other  
Equity affiliates: loans  
Other investments  
2,577  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,577  
1,207  
2,577  
1,207  
1,207  
Hedging instruments  
of non-current financial debt  
Other non-current assets  
Accounts receivable, net(c)  
Other operating receivables  
Current financial assets  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
873  
155  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,028  
2,592  
16,984  
7,191  
536  
1,028  
2,592  
16,984  
7,191  
536  
2,592  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16,984  
6,264  
-
927  
78  
-
-
117  
-
340  
-
1
-
Cash and cash equivalents  
14,647  
14,647  
14,647  
Total financial assets  
Total non-financial assets  
Total assets  
5,286  
1,207  
1,005  
-
-
-
1,213  
156  
-
-
-
37,895  
46,762  
126,729  
173,491  
46,762  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-current financial debt  
Accounts payable(c)  
(5,064)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(19,769)  
(236)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(25,069)  
(21,958)  
(5,941)  
(8,116)  
(276)  
(25,670)  
(21,958)  
(5,941)  
(8,116)  
(276)  
-
-
-
(21,958)  
Other operating liabilities  
Current borrowings  
-
(4,279)  
-
(615)  
-
-
(3,837)  
-
-
-
(19)  
-
(5,307)  
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
(44)  
(228)  
(4)  
Total financial liabilities  
Total non-financial liabilities  
Total liabilities  
(9,343)  
-
-
-
(659)  
(23,606)  
(464)  
(23)  
-
-
-
(27,265)  
(61,360)  
(112,131)  
(173,491)  
(61,961)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(a) Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(b) The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(c) The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is (2,508) million and + 2,508 million on accounts payable.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
303  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2012  
M)  
Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities  
Other  
financial  
instruments  
Total  
Fair  
value  
(
Amortized cost  
Fair value  
Available  
for sale(  
Held  
for  
trading  
Financial  
debt  
Hedging  
of financial  
debt  
Cash Net  
flow investment  
a)  
(b)  
hedge  
hedge  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
and other  
Equity affiliates: loans  
Other investments  
2,360  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,360  
1,190  
2,360  
1,190  
1,190  
Hedging instruments  
of non-current financial debt  
Other non-current assets  
Accounts receivable, net(c)  
Other operating receivables  
Current financial assets  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,566  
60  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,626  
2,207  
1,626  
2,207  
2,207  
-
-
-
-
-
-
19,206  
5,477  
-
19,206  
6,158  
19,206  
6,158  
-
1,093  
-
681  
38  
-
-
430  
-
1
-
1,562  
1,562  
Cash and cash equivalents  
15,469  
15,469  
15,469  
Total financial assets  
Total non-financial assets  
Total assets  
5,660  
1,190  
719  
-
1,996  
61  
-
-
-
40,152  
49,778  
121,446  
171,224  
49,778  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-current financial debt  
Accounts payable(c)  
(5,086)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(17,177)  
(11)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(22,274)  
(21,648)  
(5,904)  
(11,016)  
(176)  
(22,473)  
(21,648)  
(5,904)  
(11,016)  
(176)  
-
-
-
-
(21,648)  
Other operating liabilities  
Current borrowings  
-
(6,787)  
-
(456)  
-
-
(4,229)  
-
(10)  
-
(5,438)  
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
(88)  
(84)  
(4)  
Total financial liabilities  
Total non-financial liabilities  
Total liabilities  
(11,873)  
-
-
-
(544)  
(21,406)  
(95)  
(14)  
-
-
-
(27,086)  
(61,018)  
(110,206)  
(171,224)  
(61,217)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(a) Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(b) The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(c) The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is (1,082) million and + 1,082 million on accounts payable.  
304  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
As of December 31, 2011  
M)  
Financial instruments related to financing and trading activities  
Other  
financial  
instruments  
Total  
Fair  
value  
(
Amortized cost  
Fair value  
Available  
for sale(  
Held  
for  
trading  
Financial  
debt  
Hedging  
of financial  
debt  
Cash Net  
flow investment  
a)  
(b)  
hedge  
hedge  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
and other  
Equity affiliates: loans  
Other investments  
2,246  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,246  
3,674  
2,246  
3,674  
3,674  
Hedging instruments  
of non-current financial debt  
Other non-current assets  
Accounts receivable, net(c)  
Other operating receivables  
Current financial assets  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,971  
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,976  
2,055  
20,049  
7,467  
700  
1,976  
2,055  
20,049  
7,467  
700  
2,055  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
20,049  
6,450  
-
1,017  
159  
-
-
146  
-
383  
-
12  
-
Cash and cash equivalents  
14,025  
14,025  
14,025  
Total financial assets  
Total non-financial assets  
Total assets  
4,447  
3,674  
1,176  
-
-
-
2,354  
17  
-
-
-
40,524  
52,192  
111,513  
163,705  
52,192  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-current financial debt  
Accounts payable(c)  
(4,858)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(17,551)  
(97)  
(49)  
-
(2)  
(22,557)  
(22,086)  
(5,441)  
(9,675)  
(167)  
(23,247)  
(22,086)  
(5,441)  
(9,675)  
(167)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(22,086)  
Other operating liabilities  
Current borrowings  
-
(6,158)  
-
(548)  
-
-
(3,517)  
-
(4,893)  
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
(87)  
(40)  
(14)  
(26)  
Total financial liabilities  
Total non-financial liabilities  
Total liabilities  
(11,016)  
-
-
-
(635)  
(21,068)  
(137)  
(63)  
(26)  
(26,981)  
(59,926)  
(103,779)  
(163,705)  
(60,616)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(a) Financial assets available for sale are measured at their fair value except for unlisted securities (see Note 1 paragraph M(ii) and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(b) The financial debt is adjusted to the hedged risks value (currency and interest rate) as part of hedge accounting (see Note 1 paragraph M(iii) to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
(c) The impact of offsetting on accounts receivable, net is (779) million and + 779 million on accounts payable.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
305  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
29) Fair value of financial instruments (excluding commodity contracts)  
A) Impact on the statement of income per nature of financial instruments  
Operating assets and liabilities  
The impact on the statement of income is detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Assets available for sale (investments):  
dividend income on non-consolidated subsidiaries  
gains (losses) on disposal of assets  
other  
152  
112  
(71)  
80  
223  
516  
(60)  
(20)  
330  
103  
(29)  
(34)  
Loans and receivables  
Impact on net operating income  
273  
659  
370  
The impact in the statement of income mainly includes:  
Dividends and gains or losses on disposal of other investments classified as “Other investments”;  
Financial gains and depreciation on loans related to equity affiliates, non-consolidated companies and on receivables reported in “Loans  
and receivables”.  
Assets and liabilities from financing activities  
The impact on the statement of income of financing assets and liabilities is detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Loans and receivables  
70  
(677)  
7
80  
(675)  
4
271  
(730)  
17  
Financing liabilities and associated hedging instruments  
Fair value hedge (ineffective portion)  
Assets and liabilities held for trading  
(6)  
20  
2
Impact on the cost of net debt  
(606)  
(571)  
(440)  
The impact on the statement of income mainly includes:  
– Financial income, financial expense and fair value of derivative  
instruments used for cash management purposes classified as  
Financial income on cash, cash equivalents, and current financial  
assets (notably current deposits beyond three months) classified  
as “Loans and receivables”;  
“Assets and liabilities held for trading”.  
Financial derivative instruments used for cash management  
purposes (interest rate and foreign exchange) are considered  
to be held for trading. Based on practical documentation issues,  
the Group did not elect to set up hedge accounting for such  
instruments. The impact on income of the derivatives is offset by  
the impact of loans and current liabilities they are related to.  
Therefore these transactions taken as a whole do not have a  
significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Financial expense of long term subsidiaries financing, associated  
hedging instruments (excluding ineffective portion of the hedge  
detailed below) and financial expense of short term financing  
classified as “Financing liabilities and associated hedging  
instruments”;  
Ineffective portion of bond hedging; and  
306  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
B) Impact of the hedging strategies  
Fair value hedge  
The impact on the statement of income of the bond hedging instruments which is recorded in the item “Financial interest on debt” in the  
Consolidated statement of income is detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Revaluation at market value of bonds  
Swap hedging of bonds  
1,075  
(1,068)  
321  
(317)  
(301)  
318  
Ineffective portion of the fair value hedge  
7
4
17  
The ineffective portion is not representative of the Group’s performance considering the Group’s objective to hold swaps to maturity. The current  
portion of the swaps valuation is not subject to active management.  
Net investment hedge  
These instruments are recorded directly in shareholders’ equity under “Currency translation adjustments”. The variations of the period are  
detailed in the table below:  
For the year ended December 31,  
As of  
Variations  
Disposals  
As of  
(M)  
January 1,  
December 31,  
2013  
(291)  
25  
-
(266)  
2
2
012  
011  
(104)  
(243)  
(187)  
139  
-
-
(291)  
(104)  
As for December 31, 2012, the Group had no open forward hedging instruments as of December 31, 2013. The fair value of open forward  
instruments was (26) million in 2011.  
Cash flow hedge  
The impact on the statement of income and on equity of the hedging instruments qualified as cash flow hedges is detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Profit (Loss) recorded in equity during the period  
Recycled amount from equity to the income statement during the period  
117  
65  
65  
87  
(84)  
(47)  
As of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, the ineffective portion of these financial instruments is equal to zero.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
307  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
C) Maturity of derivative instruments  
The maturity of the notional amounts of derivative instruments, excluding the commodity contracts, is detailed in the following table:  
As of December 31, 2013  
(M)  
Notional value(a)  
Fair value  
Total  
2014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
2018  
2019  
and after  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Fair value hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
(236)  
873  
7,480  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,156  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(assets and liabilities)  
637  
19,636  
-
3,410  
2,606  
2,970  
3,749  
6,901  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(228)  
340  
1,366  
2,793  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
112  
4,159  
4,159  
-
-
-
-
-
Cash flow hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
155  
1,610  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(
assets and liabilities)  
155  
1,610  
-
-
20  
11  
-
-
-
-
1,610  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(4)  
1
120  
96  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
(3)  
216  
196  
-
-
-
-
Swaps hedging investments (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging investments (assets)  
(19)  
-
143  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging investments  
(assets and liabilities)  
(19)  
143  
132  
-
-
-
-
Net investment hedge  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging net investments  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Held for trading  
Other interest rate swaps (assets)  
Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)  
2
4,093  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(3)  
11,316  
Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)  
(1)  
15,409  
15,127  
86  
194  
83  
62  
51  
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
76  
4,768  
4,437  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(41)  
Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
(assets and liabilities)  
35  
9,205  
8,945  
42  
10  
14  
-
(a) These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.  
308  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
As of December 31, 2012  
M)  
Notional value(a)  
(
Fair value  
Total  
2013  
2014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
2018  
and after  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Fair value hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
(11)  
1,737  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,566  
15,431  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(assets and liabilities)  
1,555  
17,168  
-
4,205  
3,537  
2,098  
3,075  
4,253  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(84)  
430  
591  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,614  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
346  
4,205  
4,205  
-
-
-
-
-
Cash flow hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
60  
1,683  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
60  
1,683  
-
-
-
-
-
1,683  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(4)  
148  
19  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
(3)  
167  
167  
-
-
-
-
-
Swaps hedging investments (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging investments (assets)  
(10)  
-
518  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging investments (assets and liabilities)  
(10)  
518  
365  
141  
12  
-
-
-
Net investment hedge  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging net investments  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Held for trading  
Other interest rate swaps (assets)  
Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)  
2
11,041  
9,344  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2)  
Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)  
-
20,385  
19,962  
133  
88  
85  
64  
53  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
36  
4,768  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(86)  
12,224  
Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
(assets and liabilities)  
(50)  
16,992  
16,776  
186  
(15)  
16  
16  
13  
(a) These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
309  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Notional value(a)  
Fair value  
Total  
2012  
2013  
2014  
2015  
2016  
2017  
and after  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Fair value hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
(97)  
1,478  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,971  
15,653  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(assets and liabilities)  
1,874  
17,131  
-
4,204  
4,215  
3,380  
1,661  
3,671  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(40)  
383  
642  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,349  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
343  
2,991  
2,991  
-
-
-
-
-
Cash flow hedge  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
(49)  
5
967  
749  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(
assets and liabilities)  
(44)  
1,716  
-
-
-
-
-
1,716  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (current portion) (assets)  
(14)  
12  
582  
908  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds  
(current portion) (assets and liabilities)  
(2)  
1,490  
1,490  
-
-
-
-
Net investment hedge  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(26)  
881  
Total swaps hedging net investments  
(26)  
881  
881  
-
-
-
-
-
Held for trading  
Other interest rate swaps (assets)  
Other interest rate swaps (liabilities)  
1
3,605  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2)  
14,679  
Total other interest rate swaps (assets and liabilities)  
(1)  
18,284  
18,284  
-
-
-
-
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (assets)  
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts (liabilities)  
158  
(85)  
6,984  
4,453  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
(assets and liabilities)  
73  
11,437  
11,176  
80  
58  
36  
31  
56  
(a) These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.  
310  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
D) Fair value hierarchy  
The fair value hierarchy for financial instruments excluding commodity contracts is as follows:  
As of December 31, 2013  
M)  
Quoted prices  
Prices based  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
(
in active markets on observable  
for identical  
assets  
data  
(level 2)  
observable  
data  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Fair value hedge instruments  
Cash flow hedge instruments  
Net investment hedge instruments  
Assets and liablities held for trading  
Assets available for sale  
-
-
-
749  
133  
-
34  
-
-
-
-
-
-
749  
133  
-
34  
116  
-
116  
Total  
116  
916  
-
1,032  
As of December 31, 2012  
(M)  
Quoted prices Prices based  
in active markets on observable  
for identical data  
assets  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
observable  
data  
(level 2)  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Fair value hedge instruments  
Cash flow hedge instruments  
Net investment hedge instruments  
Assets and liablities held for trading  
Assets available for sale  
-
-
-
-
91  
1,901  
-
-
-
-
-
1,901  
47  
47  
-
(50)  
-
-
(50)  
91  
Total  
91  
1,898  
-
1,989  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Quoted prices Prices based  
in active markets on observable  
for identical data  
assets  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
observable  
data  
(level 2)  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Fair value hedge instruments  
Cash flow hedge instruments  
Net investment hedge instruments  
Assets and liablities held for trading  
Assets available for sale  
-
-
-
-
2,217  
(46)  
(26)  
72  
-
-
-
-
-
2,217  
(46)  
(26)  
72  
2,575  
2,575  
-
Total  
2,575  
2,217  
-
4,792  
The description of each fair value level is presented in Note 1 paragraph M(v) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
311  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
30) Financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
Financial instruments related to oil, gas and power activities as well as related currency derivatives are recorded at fair value under “Other  
current assets” or “Other creditors and accrued liabilities” depending on whether they are assets or liabilities.  
As of December 31, 2013  
M)  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
assets  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
liabilities  
Amounts  
offset -  
assets(  
Amounts  
offset -  
Net balance Net balance  
sheet value sheet value  
presented - presented -  
assets liabilities  
Other  
amounts  
not  
Net  
carrying  
amount  
Fair  
(b)  
value  
(
c)  
(c)  
liabilities  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
offset  
Crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight  
rates activities  
Petroleum products  
and crude oil swaps  
Freight rate swaps  
Forwards(a)  
68  
-
42  
144  
5
(148)  
-
(41)  
(170)  
(1)  
(57)  
-
(6)  
(45)  
-
57  
-
6
45  
-
11  
-
36  
99  
5
(91)  
-
-
-
-
-
(80)  
-
1
(26)  
4
(80)  
-
1
(26)  
4
-
(35)  
(125)  
(1)  
Options  
Futures  
Options on futures  
Other/Collateral  
49  
-
(41)  
-
(41)  
-
41  
-
8
-
-
-
-
70  
8
70  
8
70  
Total crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight rates 308  
(401)  
(149)  
149  
159  
(252)  
70  
(23)  
(23)  
Gas & Power activities  
Swaps  
50  
763  
(15)  
(384)  
(9)  
-
-
(8)  
(29)  
(8)  
-
8
29  
8
-
-
42  
734  
(8)  
-
(7)  
(355)  
(1)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
11  
35  
379  
(9)  
-
11  
35  
379  
(9)  
-
11  
Forwards(a)  
Options  
Futures  
Other/Collateral  
-
-
-
-
-
Total Gas & Power  
Total  
813  
(408)  
(809)  
(45)  
45  
768  
927  
(363)  
(615)  
11  
81  
416  
393  
416  
393  
-
1,121  
(194)  
194  
Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet  
(
(
a) Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.  
b) When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet,  
this fair value is set to zero.  
c) Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.  
(
312  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
As of December 31, 2012  
M)  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
assets  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
liabilities  
Amounts  
offset -  
assets(  
Amounts  
offset -  
Net balance Net balance  
sheet value sheet value  
presented - presented -  
assets liabilities  
Other  
amounts  
not  
Net  
carrying  
amount  
Fair  
(b)  
value  
(
c)  
(c)  
liabilities  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
offset  
Crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight  
rates activities  
Petroleum products  
and crude oil swaps  
Freight rate swaps  
Forwards(a)  
Options  
Futures  
Options on futures  
Other/Collateral  
142  
-
7
231  
-
64  
-
(168)  
-
(9)  
(249)  
(6)  
(59)  
-
(90)  
-
(3)  
(226)  
-
(59)  
-
90  
-
3
226  
-
59  
-
52  
-
4
5
-
(78)  
-
(6)  
(23)  
(6)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
(26)  
-
(2)  
(18)  
(6)  
5
(26)  
-
(2)  
(18)  
(6)  
5
5
-
-
22  
-
22  
22  
Total crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight rates 444  
(491)  
(378)  
378  
66  
(113)  
22  
(25)  
(25)  
Gas & Power activities  
Swaps  
54  
(71)  
(361)  
(13)  
-
(43)  
(48)  
(11)  
-
43  
48  
11  
-
11  
604  
(28)  
(313)  
(2)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
31  
(17)  
291  
(2)  
-
31  
(17)  
291  
(2)  
-
31  
Forwards(a)  
652  
11  
-
Options  
Futures  
Other/Collateral  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Gas & Power  
Total  
717  
(445)  
(936)  
(102)  
(480)  
102  
480  
615  
681  
(343)  
(456)  
31  
53  
303  
278  
303  
278  
-
1,161  
Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet  
(
(
a) Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.  
b) When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet,  
this fair value is set to zero.  
c) Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.  
(
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
313  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
As of December 31, 2011  
M)  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
assets  
Gross value  
before  
offsetting -  
liabilities  
Amounts  
offset -  
assets(  
Amounts  
offset -  
Net balance Net balance  
sheet value sheet value  
presented - presented -  
assets liabilities  
Other  
amounts  
not  
Net  
carrying  
amount  
Fair  
(b)  
value  
(
c)  
(c)  
liabilities  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
offset  
Crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight  
rates activities  
Petroleum products  
and crude oil swaps  
Freight rate swaps  
Forwards(a)  
Options  
Futures  
Options on futures  
Other/Collateral  
345  
-
11  
313  
-
(342)  
-
(240)  
-
(6)  
(297)  
-
(96)  
-
240  
-
6
297  
-
96  
-
105  
-
5
16  
-
-
(102)  
-
(21)  
(20)  
(14)  
(6)  
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
(16)  
(4)  
(14)  
(6)  
(50)  
3
-
(16)  
(4)  
(14)  
(6)  
(50)  
(27)  
(317)  
(14)  
(102)  
-
96  
-
-
-
-
(50)  
Total crude oil, petroleum  
products and freight rates 765  
(802)  
(639)  
639  
126  
(163)  
(50)  
(87)  
(87)  
Gas & Power activities  
Swaps  
72  
(15)  
(497)  
(18)  
-
(9)  
(121)  
(15)  
-
9
121  
15  
-
63  
828  
(6)  
(376)  
(3)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
24  
57  
452  
(3)  
-
24  
57  
452  
(3)  
-
24  
Forwards(a)  
949  
15  
-
Options  
Futures  
Other/Collateral  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total Gas & Power  
Total  
1,036  
1,801  
(530)  
(145)  
(784)  
145  
784  
891  
(385)  
(548)  
24  
530  
443  
530  
443  
-
(1,332)  
1,017  
(26)  
Total of fair value non recognized in the balance sheet  
(
(
a) Forwards: contracts resulting in physical delivery are accounted for as derivative commodity contracts and included in the amounts shown.  
b) When the fair value of derivatives listed on an organized exchange market (futures, options on futures and swaps) is offset with the margin call received or paid in the balance sheet,  
this fair value is set to zero.  
c) Amounts offset in accordance with IAS 32.  
(
Most commitments on crude oil and refined products have a short term maturity (less than one year). The maturity of most Gas & Power energy  
derivatives is less than three years forward.  
The changes in fair value of financial instruments related to commodity contracts are detailed as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
M)  
Fair value  
as of January 1,  
Impact on  
income  
Settled  
contracts  
Other Fair value as of  
December 31,  
(
Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities  
013  
2
(47)  
1,706  
(1,754)  
2
(93)  
2
2
012  
011  
(37)  
38  
1,694  
1,572  
(1,705)  
(1,648)  
1
1
(47)  
(37)  
Gas & Power activities  
2013  
272  
470  
(282)  
(55)  
405  
2
2
012  
011  
506  
(98)  
588  
899  
(825)  
(295)  
3
-
272  
506  
314  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The fair value hierarchy for financial instruments related to commodity contracts is as follows:  
As of December 31, 2013  
M)  
Quoted prices  
Prices based  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
(
in active markets on observable  
for identical  
assets  
data  
(level 2)  
observable  
data  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities  
Gas & Power activities  
15  
-
(108)  
405  
-
-
(93)  
405  
Total  
15  
297  
-
312  
As of December 31, 2012  
(M)  
Quoted prices Prices based  
in active markets on observable  
for identical data  
assets  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
observable  
data  
(level 2)  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities  
Gas & Power activities  
5
(52)  
(52)  
324  
-
-
(47)  
272  
Total  
(47)  
272  
-
225  
As of December 31, 2011  
(M)  
Quoted prices Prices based  
in active markets on observable  
for identical data  
assets  
Prices based  
on non  
Total  
observable  
data  
(level 2)  
(level 1)  
(level 3)  
Crude oil, petroleum products and freight rates activities  
Gas & Power activities  
(38)  
(44)  
1
550  
-
-
(37)  
506  
Total  
(82)  
551  
-
469  
The description of each fair value level is presented in Note 1 paragraph M(v) to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
31) Financial risks management  
Oil and gas market related risks  
The Trading & Shipping division measures its market risk exposure,  
i.e., potential loss in fair values, on its crude oil, refined products and  
freight rates trading activities using a value-at-risk technique. This  
technique is based on an historical model and makes an assessment  
of the market risk arising from possible future changes in market values  
over a 24-hour period. The calculation of the range of potential changes  
in fair values takes into account a snapshot of the end-of-day exposures  
and the set of historical price movements for the last 400 business  
days for all instruments and maturities in the global trading activities.  
Options are systematically re-evaluated using appropriate models.  
Due to the nature of its business, the Group has significant oil and  
gas trading activities as part of its day-to-day operations in order  
to optimize revenues from its oil and gas production and to obtain  
favorable pricing to supply its refineries.  
In its international oil trading business, the Group follows a policy  
of not selling its future production. However, in connection with this  
trading business, the Group, like most other oil companies, uses  
energy derivative instruments to adjust its exposure to price fluctuations  
of crude oil, refined products, natural gas, power and coal. The Group  
also uses freight rate derivative contracts in its shipping business to  
adjust its exposure to freight-rate fluctuations. To hedge against this  
risk, the Group uses various instruments such as futures, forwards,  
swaps and options on organized markets or over-the-counter markets.  
The list of the different derivatives held by the Group in these markets  
is detailed in Note 30 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
The potential movement in fair values corresponds to a 97.5% value-  
at-risk type confidence level. This means that the Group’s portfolio  
result is likely to exceed the value-at-risk loss measure once over  
40 business days if the portfolio exposures were left unchanged.  
Trading & Shipping: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability  
As of December 31,  
(
M)  
High  
9.9  
Low  
3.5  
Average  
6.2  
Year end  
7.1  
2013  
2
2
012  
011  
13.0  
10.6  
3.8  
3.7  
7.4  
6.1  
5.5  
6.3  
As part of its gas, power and coal trading activity, the Group also  
uses derivative instruments such as futures, forwards, swaps and  
options in both organized and over-the-counter markets. In general,  
the transactions are settled at maturity date through physical  
delivery. The Gas & Power division measures its market risk  
exposure, i.e., potential loss in fair values, on its trading business  
using a value-at-risk technique. This technique is based on an  
historical model and makes an assessment of the market risk arising  
from possible future changes in market values over a one-day  
period. The calculation of the range of potential changes in fair  
values takes into account a snapshot of the end-of-day exposures  
and the set of historical price movements for the past two years  
for all instruments and maturities in the global trading business.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
315  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Gas & Power trading: value-at-risk with a 97.5% probability  
As of December 31,  
(
M)  
High  
9.0  
Low  
2.0  
Average  
4.0  
Year end  
5.0  
2013  
2
2
012  
011  
20.9  
21.0  
2.6  
12.7  
7.4  
16.0  
2.8  
17.6  
The Group has implemented strict policies and procedures to  
manage and monitor these market risks. These are based on  
the separation of control and front-office functions and on an  
integrated information system that enables real-time monitoring  
of trading activities.  
An overall authorized credit limit is set for each bank and is allotted  
among the subsidiaries and the Group’s central treasury entities  
according to their needs.  
To reduce the market values risk on its commitments, in particular  
for swaps set as part of bonds issuance, the Treasury Department  
also developed a system of margin call that is gradually  
implemented with significant counterparties.  
Limits on trading positions are approved by the Group’s Executive  
Committee and are monitored daily. To increase flexibility and  
encourage liquidity, hedging operations are performed with numerous  
independent operators, including other oil companies, major energy  
producers or consumers and financial institutions. The Group has  
established counterparty limits and monitors outstanding amounts  
with each counterparty on an ongoing basis.  
Currency exposure  
The Group seeks to minimize the currency exposure of each entity  
to its functional currency (primarily the euro, the dollar, the pound  
sterling and the Norwegian krone).  
Financial markets related risks  
For currency exposure generated by commercial activity, the hedging  
of revenues and costs in foreign currencies is typically performed  
using currency operations on the spot market and, in some cases,  
on the forward market. The Group rarely hedges future cash flows,  
although it may use options to do so.  
As part of its financing and cash management activities, the Group  
uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to changes  
in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These instruments  
are mainly interest rate and currency swaps. The Group may also  
occasionally use futures contracts and options. These operations  
and their accounting treatment are detailed in Notes 1 paragraph M,  
With respect to currency exposure linked to non-current assets  
booked in a currency other than the euro, the Group has a policy  
of reducing the related currency exposure by financing these assets  
in the same currency.  
20, 28 and 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Risks relative to cash management operations and to interest rate  
and foreign exchange financial instruments are managed according  
to rules set by the Group’s senior management, which provide  
for regular pooling of available cash balances, open positions  
and management of the financial instruments by the Treasury  
Department. Excess cash of the Group is deposited mainly in  
government institutions, deposit banks, or major companies  
through deposits, reverse repurchase agreements and purchase  
of commercial paper. Liquidity positions and the management of  
financial instruments are centralized by the Treasury Department,  
where they are managed by a team specialized in foreign exchange  
and interest rate market transactions.  
Net short-term currency exposure is periodically monitored against  
limits set by the Group’s senior management.  
The non-current debt described in Note 20 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements is generally raised by the corporate treasury  
entities either directly in dollars or in euros, or in other currencies  
which are then exchanged for dollars or euros through swaps  
issues to appropriately match general corporate needs. The proceeds  
from these debt issuances are loaned to affiliates whose accounts  
are kept in dollars or in euros. Thus, the net sensitivity of these  
positions to currency exposure is not significant.  
The Group’s short-term currency swaps, the notional value of which  
appears in Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, are  
used to attempt to optimize the centralized cash management of  
the Group. Thus, the sensitivity to currency fluctuations which may  
be induced is likewise considered negligible.  
The Cash Monitoring-Management Unit within the Treasury  
Department monitors limits and positions per bank on a daily  
basis and results of the Front Office. This unit also prepares  
marked-to-market valuations of used financial instruments and,  
when necessary, performs sensitivity analysis.  
Short-term interest rate exposure and cash  
Counterparty risk  
Cash balances, which are primarily composed of euros and dollars,  
are managed according to the guidelines established by the Group’s  
senior management (maintain an adequate level of liquidity, optimize  
revenue from investments considering existing interest rate yield  
curves, and minimize the cost of borrowing) over a less than  
twelve-month horizon and on the basis of a daily interest rate  
benchmark, primarily through short-term interest rate swaps and  
short-term currency swaps, without modifying currency exposure.  
The Group has established standards for market transactions under  
which bank counterparties must be approved in advance, based on  
an assessment of the counterparty’s financial soundness (multi-criteria  
analysis including a review of market prices and of the Credit Default  
Swap (CDS), its ratings with Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, which  
must be of high quality, and its overall financial condition).  
316  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Interest rate risk on non-current debt  
Sensitivity analysis on interest rate  
and foreign exchange risk  
The Group’s policy consists of incurring non-current debt primarily  
at a floating rate, or, if the opportunity arises at the time of an issuance,  
at a fixed rate. Debt is incurred in dollars or in euros according to  
general corporate needs. Long-term interest rate and currency  
swaps may be used to hedge bonds at their issuance in order to  
create a variable or fixed rate synthetic debt. In order to partially  
modify the interest rate structure of the long-term debt, TOTAL may  
also enter into long-term interest rate swaps.  
The tables below present the potential impact of an increase  
or decrease of 10 basis points on the interest rate yield curves  
for each of the currencies on the fair value of the current financial  
instruments as of December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.  
Change in fair value  
due to a change  
in interest rate by:  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Carrying  
amount  
Estimated  
fair value  
+10 basis  
points  
-10 basis  
points  
(M)  
As of December 31, 2013  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(24,028)  
(236)  
1,028  
792  
3,784  
(1)  
(24,629)  
(236)  
1,028  
792  
3,784  
(1)  
39  
-
-
(28)  
4
(1)  
-
(39)  
-
-
27  
(4)  
1
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
13  
13  
-
As of December 31, 2012  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(21,346)  
(11)  
1,626  
1,615  
4,251  
-
(21,545)  
(11)  
1,626  
1,615  
4,251  
-
97  
-
-
(58)  
4
2
(97)  
-
-
58  
(4)  
(2)  
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
(50)  
(50)  
-
As of December 31, 2011  
Bonds (non-current portion, before swaps)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (liabilities)  
Swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets)  
Total swaps hedging fixed-rates bonds (assets and liabilities)  
Current portion of non-current debt after swap (excluding capital lease obligations)  
Other interest rates swaps  
(21,402)  
(146)  
1,976  
1,830  
3,488  
(1)  
(22,092)  
(146)  
1,976  
1,830  
3,488  
(1)  
83  
-
-
(49)  
3
3
(83)  
-
-
49  
(3)  
(3)  
-
Currency swaps and forward exchange contracts  
47  
47  
-
The impact of changes in interest rates on the cost of net debt before tax is as follows:  
For the year ended December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Cost of net debt  
(606)  
(571)  
(440)  
Interest rate translation of:  
+
+
10 basis points  
10 basis points  
100 basis points  
100 basis points  
(11)  
11  
(113)  
113  
(11)  
11  
(106)  
106  
(10)  
10  
(103)  
103  
As a result of the policy for the management of currency exposure previously described, the Group’s sensitivity to currency exposure is  
primarily influenced by the net equity of the subsidiaries whose functional currency is the dollar and, to a lesser extent, the pound sterling  
and the Norwegian krone.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
317  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
This sensitivity is reflected in the historical evolution of the currency translation adjustment recorded in the statement of changes in  
shareholders’ equity which, in the course of the last three fiscal years, is essentially related to the fluctuation of dollar and pound sterling  
and is set forth in the table below:  
Euro/Dollar  
Euro/Pound sterling  
exchange rates  
exchange rates  
As of December 31, 2013  
1.38  
0.83  
As of December 31, 2012  
As of December 31, 2011  
1.32  
1.29  
0.82  
0.84  
As of December 31, 2013  
Total  
Euro  
Dollar  
Pound  
Other currencies  
(M)  
sterling  
and equity affiliates  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge – open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2013  
77,014  
46,984  
23,599  
4,289  
2,142  
(4,385)  
-
-
-
(2,524)  
-
(931)  
-
(930)  
-
72,629  
Total  
46,984  
Euro  
21,075  
Dollar  
22,253  
3,358  
1,212  
As of December 31, 2012  
Pound  
sterling  
Other currencies  
and equity affiliates  
(M)  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge – open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2012  
72,689  
44,968  
4,268  
1,200  
(1,504)  
-
-
-
(782)  
-
(837)  
-
115  
-
71,185  
Total  
44,968  
Euro  
21,471  
Dollar  
21,554  
3,431  
1,315  
As of December 31, 2011  
Pound  
sterling  
Other currencies  
and equity affiliates  
(M)  
Shareholders’ equity at historical exchange rate  
Currency translation adjustment before  
net investment hedge  
Net investment hedge – open instruments  
Shareholders’ equity at exchange rate  
as of December 31, 2011  
67,949  
40,763  
4,464  
1,168  
(978)  
(26)  
-
-
120  
(25)  
(931)  
(1)  
(167)  
-
66,945  
40,763  
21,649  
3,532  
1,001  
As a result of this policy, the impact of currency exchange rate  
fluctuations on consolidated income, as illustrated in Note 7 to the  
Consolidated Financial Statements, has not been significant over  
the last three years despite the considerable fluctuation of the dollar  
Liquidity risk  
TOTAL S.A. has confirmed lines of credit granted by international  
banks, which are calculated to allow it to manage its short-term  
liquidity needs as required.  
(a gain of 6 million in 2013, a gain of 26 million in 2012 and  
a gain of 118 million in 2011).  
As of December 31, 2013, these lines of credit amounted  
to $11,031 million, of which $11,031 million was unused.  
The agreements for the lines of credit granted to TOTAL S.A.  
do not contain conditions related to the Company’s financial ratios,  
to its financial ratings from specialized agencies, or to the  
occurrence of events that could have a material adverse effect  
on its financial position. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate  
amount of the principal confirmed lines of credit granted by  
international banks to Group companies, including TOTAL S.A.,  
was $11,581 million, of which $11,421 million was unused. The  
lines of credit granted to Group companies other than TOTAL S.A.  
are not intended to finance the Group’s general needs; they are  
intended to finance either the general needs of the borrowing  
subsidiary or a specific project.  
Stock market risk  
The Group holds interests in a number of publicly-traded companies  
(see Notes 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
The market value of these holdings fluctuates due to various  
factors, including stock market trends, valuations of the sectors  
in which the companies operate, and the economic and financial  
condition of each individual company.  
318  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
The following tables show the maturity of the financial assets and liabilities of the Group as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (see Note 20  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
As of December 31, 2013  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(8,116)  
(276)  
(3,370)  
(3,284)  
(3,015)  
(3,162)  
(11,210)  
(24,041)  
(8,116)  
(276)  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Assets and liabilities available  
for sale or exchange  
536  
536  
130  
14,647  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
130  
14,647  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
6,921  
(3,370)  
(3,284)  
(3,015)  
(3,162)  
(11,210)  
(17,120)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(729)  
350  
(661)  
284  
(554)  
100  
(508)  
(24)  
(447)  
(80)  
(1,294)  
(515)  
(4,193)  
115  
Net amount  
6,542  
(3,747)  
(3,738)  
(3,547)  
(3,689)  
(13,019)  
(21,198)  
As of December 31, 2012  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(11,016)  
(176)  
(3,832)  
(3,465)  
(2,125)  
(3,126)  
(8,100)  
(20,648)  
(11,016)  
(176)  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Assets and liabilities available  
for sale or exchange  
1,562  
1,562  
(756)  
15,469  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(756)  
15,469  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
5,083  
(3,832)  
(3,465)  
(2,125)  
(3,126)  
(8,100)  
(15,565)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(746)  
371  
(625)  
335  
(519)  
225  
(405)  
106  
(352)  
62  
(1,078)  
(37)  
(3,725)  
1,062  
Net amount  
4,708  
(4,122)  
(3,760)  
(2,424)  
(3,416)  
(9,215)  
(18,228)  
As of December 31, 2011  
(
M)  
Less than  
one year  
1-2 years  
2-3 years  
3-4 years  
4-5 years  
More than  
5 years  
Total  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
Non-current financial debt  
(
notional value excluding interests)  
-
(9,675)  
(167)  
700  
14,025  
(4,492)  
(3,630)  
(3,614)  
(1,519)  
(7,326)  
(20,581)  
(9,675)  
(167)  
700  
14,025  
Current borrowings  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other current financial liabilities  
Current financial assets  
Cash and cash equivalents  
Net amount before financial expense  
4,883  
(4,492)  
(3,630)  
(3,614)  
(1,519)  
(7,326)  
(15,698)  
Financial expense on non-current financial debt  
Interest differential on swaps  
(785)  
320  
(691)  
331  
(521)  
221  
(417)  
120  
(302)  
55  
(1,075)  
44  
(3,791)  
1,091  
Net amount  
4,418  
(4,852)  
(3,930)  
(3,911)  
(1,766)  
(8,357)  
(18,398)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
319  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
In addition, the Group guarantees bank debt and finance lease  
obligations of certain non-consolidated companies and equity  
affiliates. A payment would be triggered by failure of the guaranteed  
party to fulfill its obligation covered by the guarantee, and no assets  
are held as collateral for these guarantees. Maturity dates and  
amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements (“Guarantees given against borrowings”).  
The Group also guarantees the current liabilities of certain  
non-consolidated companies. Performance under these guarantees  
would be triggered by a financial default of these entities. Maturity  
dates and amounts are set forth in Note 23 to the Consolidated  
Financial Statements (“Guarantees of current liabilities”).  
The following table sets forth financial assets and liabilities related to operating activities as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (see Note 28  
to the Consolidated Financial Statements).  
As of December 31  
(M)  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Accounts payable  
Other operating liabilities  
including financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
Accounts receivable, net  
Other operating receivables  
(21,958)  
(5,941)  
(615)  
16,984  
7,191  
927  
(21,648)  
(5,904)  
(456)  
19,206  
6,158  
681  
(22,086)  
(5,441)  
(548)  
20,049  
7,467  
including financial instruments related to commodity contracts  
1,017  
Total  
(3,724)  
(2,188)  
(11)  
These financial assets and liabilities mainly have a maturity date below one year.  
Credit risk  
Credit risk is defined as the risk of the counterparty to a contract failing to perform or pay the amounts due.  
The Group is exposed to credit risks in its operating and financing activities. The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is partially related  
to financial assets recorded on its balance sheet, including energy derivative instruments that have a positive market value.  
The following table presents the Group’s maximum credit risk exposure:  
As of December 31  
(M)  
Assets/(Liabilities)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Loans to equity affiliates (Note 12)  
Loans and advances (Note 14)  
Hedging instruments of non-current financial debt (Note 20)  
Accounts receivable (Note 16)  
Other operating receivables (Note 16)  
Current financial assets (Note 20)  
2,577  
2,592  
1,028  
16,984  
7,191  
536  
2,360  
2,207  
1,626  
19,206  
6,158  
1,562  
15,469  
2,246  
2,055  
1,976  
20,049  
7,467  
700  
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 27)  
14,647  
14,025  
Total  
45,555  
48,588  
48,518  
The valuation allowance on loans and advances and on accounts  
receivable and other operating receivables is detailed respectively  
in Notes 14 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.  
Credit risk is managed by the Group’s business segments as follows:  
Upstream segment  
-
Exploration & Production  
As part of its credit risk management related to operating and  
financing activities, the Group has developed margin call contracts  
with certain counterparties. As of December 31, 2013, the net  
amount received as part of these margin calls was 801 million  
Risks arising under contracts with government authorities  
or other oil companies or under long-term supply contracts  
necessary for the development of projects are evaluated during  
the project approval process. The long-term aspect of these  
contracts and the high-quality of the other parties lead to a low  
level of credit risk.  
(against 1,635 million as of December 31, 2012 and  
1,682 million as of December 31, 2011).  
Risks related to commercial operations, other than those  
described above (which are, in practice, directly monitored  
by subsidiaries), are subject to procedures for establishing  
and reviewing credit.  
320  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Customer receivables are subject to provisions on a case-by-case  
basis, based on prior history and management’s assessment of  
the facts and circumstances.  
- Trading & Shipping  
Trading & Shipping deals with commercial counterparties and  
financial institutions located throughout the world. Counterparties  
to physical and derivative transactions are primarily entities  
involved in the oil and gas industry or in the Trading of energy  
commodities, or financial institutions. Credit risk coverage is  
concluded with financial institutions, international banks and  
insurance groups selected in accordance with strict criteria.  
-
Gas & Power  
Gas & Power deals with counterparties in the energy, industrial  
and financial sectors throughout the world. Financial institutions  
providing credit risk coverage are highly rated international bank  
and insurance groups.  
The Trading & Shipping division has a strict policy of internal  
delegation of authority governing establishment of country and  
counterparty credit limits and approval of specific transactions.  
Credit exposures contracted under these limits and approvals  
are monitored on a daily basis.  
Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment and  
approval before concluding transactions and are thereafter  
subject to regular review, including re-appraisal and approval  
of the limits previously granted.  
The creditworthiness of counterparties is assessed based on  
an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial  
standing and business risks, together with the review of any  
relevant third party and market information, such as data  
published by rating agencies. On this basis, credit limits are  
defined for each potential counterparty and, where appropriate,  
transactions are subject to specific authorizations.  
Potential counterparties are subject to credit assessment  
and approval prior to any transaction being concluded and all  
active counterparties are subject to regular reviews, including  
re-appraisal and approval of granted limits. The creditworthiness  
of counterparties is assessed based on an analysis of  
quantitative and qualitative data regarding financial standing  
and business risks, together with the review of any relevant  
third party and market information, such as ratings published  
by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and  
other agencies.  
Credit exposure, which is essentially an economic exposure or  
an expected future physical exposure, is permanently monitored  
and subject to sensitivity measures.  
Credit risk is mitigated by the systematic use of industry standard  
contractual frameworks that permit netting, enable requiring  
added security in case of adverse change in the counterparty  
risk, and allow for termination of the contract upon occurrence  
of certain events of default.  
Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the  
risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever  
possible and additional protective terms providing for the provision  
of security in the event of financial deterioration and the termination  
of transactions on the occurrence of defined default events are  
used to the greatest permitted extent.  
Refining & Chemicals segment  
Credit risks in excess of approved levels are secured by means  
of letters of credit and other guarantees, cash deposits and  
insurance arrangements. In respect of derivative transactions,  
risks are secured by margin call contracts wherever possible.  
-
Refining & Chemicals  
Credit risk is primarily related to commercial receivables. Internal  
procedures of Refining & Chemicals include rules for the  
management of credit describing the fundamentals of internal  
control in this domain. Each division implements procedures  
for managing and provisioning credit risk that differ based on  
the size of the subsidiary and the market in which it operates.  
The principal elements of these procedures are:  
Marketing & Services segment  
Internal procedures for the Marketing & Services division include  
rules on credit risk that describe the basis of internal control in this  
domain, including the separation of authority between commercial  
and financial operations. Credit policies are defined at the local  
level, complemented by the implementation of procedures to  
monitor customer risk (credit committees at the subsidiary level,  
the creation of credit limits for corporate customers, portfolio  
guarantees, etc.).  
-
-
-
-
implementation of credit limits with different authorization  
procedures for possible credit overruns;  
use of insurance policies or specific guarantees (letters  
of credit);  
regular monitoring and assessment of overdue accounts  
(aging balance), including collection procedures; and  
Each entity also implements monitoring of its outstanding  
receivables. Risks related to credit may be mitigated or limited  
by subscription of credit insurance and/or requiring security  
or guarantees.  
provisioning of bad debts on a customer-by-customer basis,  
according to payment delays and local payment practices  
(provisions may also be calculated based on statistics).  
Counterparties are subject to credit assessment and approval prior  
to any transaction being concluded. Regular reviews are made  
for all active counterparties including a re-appraisal and renewing  
of the granted credit limits. The limits of the counterparties are  
assessed based on quantitative and qualitative data regarding  
financial standing, together with the review of any relevant third  
party and market information, such as that provided by rating  
agencies and insurance companies.  
Bad debts are provisioned on a case-by-case basis at a rate  
determined by management based on an assessment of the risk  
of credit loss.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
321  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
32) Other risks and contingent liabilities  
TOTAL is not currently aware of any exceptional event, dispute,  
risks or contingent liabilities that could have a material impact on  
the assets and liabilities, results, financial position or operations  
of the Group.  
authority in 2006. The existence and the assessment of the  
alleged damages in this procedure involving multiple defendants  
are strongly contested.  
Whatever the evolution of the proceedings described above, the  
Group believes that their outcome should not have a material adverse  
effect on the Group’s financial situation or consolidated results.  
Antitrust investigations  
The principal antitrust proceedings in which the Group’s companies  
are involved are described thereafter.  
Grande Paroisse  
Refining & Chemicals segment  
An explosion occurred at the Grande Paroisse industrial site in the  
city of Toulouse in France on September 21, 2001. Grande  
Paroisse, a former subsidiary of Atofina which became a subsidiary  
of Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants on December 31, 2004, as part of the  
reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged  
in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion,  
which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed  
a portion of the site and caused the death of thirty-one people,  
including twenty-one workers at the site, and injured many others.  
The explosion also caused significant damage to certain property  
in part of the city of Toulouse.  
As part of the spin-off of Arkema(1) in 2006, TOTAL S.A. and certain  
other Group companies agreed to grant Arkema for a period of ten  
years a guarantee for potential monetary consequences related  
to antitrust proceedings arising from events prior to the spin-off.  
As of December 31, 2013, all public and civil proceedings covered  
by the guarantee were definitively resolved in Europe and in the  
United States. Despite the fact that Arkema has implemented since  
2001 compliance procedures that are designed to prevent its  
employees from violating antitrust provisions, it is not possible to  
exclude the possibility that the relevant authorities could commence  
additional proceedings involving Arkema regarding events prior  
to the spin-off.  
This plant has been closed and individual assistance packages  
have been provided for employees. The site has been rehabilitated.  
On December 14, 2006, Grande Paroisse signed, under the  
supervision of the city of Toulouse, a deed whereby it donated  
the former site of the AZF plant to the greater agglomeration of  
Toulouse (CAGT) and the Caisse des dépôts et consignations and  
its subsidiary ICADE. Under this deed, TOTAL S.A. guaranteed the  
site remediation obligations of Grande Paroisse and granted a  
10 million endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation  
as part of the setting up of a cancer research center at the site  
by the city of Toulouse.  
Marketing & Services segment  
The administrative procedure opened by the European  
Commission against TOTAL Nederland N.V and TOTAL S.A.,  
as parent company, in relation to practices regarding a product  
line of the Marketing & Services segment, resulted in a  
condemnation in 2006 that became definitive in 2012. The  
resulting fine (20.25 million) and interest thereon were paid  
during the first quarter of 2013.  
Following the appeal lodged by the Group’s companies against  
the European Commission’s 2008 decision fining Total Marketing  
Services an amount of 128.2 million, in relation to practices  
regarding a product line of the Marketing & Services segment,  
which the Company had already paid, and concerning which  
TOTAL S.A. was declared jointly liable as the parent company,  
the relevant European court decided during the third quarter of  
After having articulated several hypotheses, the Court-appointed  
experts did not maintain in their final report filed on May 11, 2006,  
that the accident was caused by pouring a large quantity of a  
chlorine compound over ammonium nitrate. Instead, the experts  
have retained a scenario where a container of chlorine compound  
sweepings was poured between a layer of wet ammonium nitrate  
covering the floor and a quantity of dry agricultural nitrate at a  
location not far from the principal storage site. This is claimed to  
have caused an explosion which then spread into the main storage  
site. Grande Paroisse was investigated based on this new hypothesis  
in 2006; Grande Paroisse is contesting this explanation, which it  
believes to be based on elements that are not factually accurate.  
2013 to reduce the fine imposed on Total Marketing Services to  
125.5 million without modifying the liability of TOTAL S.A. as  
parent company. Appeals have been lodged against this judgment.  
In the United Kingdom, a settlement took place in the third  
quarter of 2013 putting an end to the civil proceeding initiated  
against TOTAL S.A., Total Marketing Services and other companies,  
by third parties alleging damages in connection with practices  
already sanctioned by the European Commission. A similar civil  
proceeding is pending in the Netherlands. At this stage, the  
plaintiffs have not communicated the amount of their claim.  
On July 9, 2007, the investigating magistrate brought charges  
against Grande Paroisse and the former Plant Manager before the  
Toulouse Criminal Court. In late 2008, TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry  
Desmarest, Chairman and CEO at the time of the event, were  
summoned to appear in Court pursuant to a request by a victims  
association.  
Finally, in Italy, in 2013, a civil proceeding was initiated against  
TOTAL S.A. and its subsidiary Total Aviazione Italia Srl before  
the competent Italian civil court. The plaintiff claims against  
TOTAL S.A., its subsidiary and other third parties, damages that  
it estimates to be nearly 908 million. This procedure follows  
practices that had been sanctioned by the Italian competition  
On November 19, 2009, the Toulouse Criminal Court acquitted  
both the former Plant Manager, and Grande Paroisse due to the  
lack of reliable evidence for the explosion. The Court also ruled that  
the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and Mr. Thierry Desmarest  
were inadmissible.  
(
1) Arkema is used in this section to designate those companies of the Arkema group whose ultimate parent company is Arkema S.A. Arkema became an independent company after being  
spun-off from TOTAL S.A. in May 2006.  
322  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Due to the presumption of civil liability that applied to Grande  
Paroisse, the Court declared Grande Paroisse civilly liable for the  
damages caused by the explosion to the victims in its capacity  
as custodian and operator of the plant.  
Iran  
In 2003, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission  
SEC) followed by the Department of Justice (DoJ) issued a formal  
(
order directing an investigation in connection with the pursuit  
of business in Iran by certain oil companies including, among  
others, TOTAL. The inquiry concerned an agreement concluded  
by the Company with consultants concerning gas fields in Iran  
and aimed at verifying whether certain payments made under  
this agreement would have benefited Iranian officials in violation  
of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the Company’s  
accounting obligations.  
The Prosecutor’s office, together with certain third parties, appealed  
the Toulouse Criminal Court verdict. In order to preserve its rights,  
Grande Paroisse lodged a cross-appeal with respect to civil charges.  
By its decision of September 24, 2012, the Court of Appeal of  
Toulouse (Cour d’appel de Toulouse) upheld the lower court verdict  
pursuant to which the summonses against TOTAL S.A. and  
Mr. Thierry Desmarest were determined to be inadmissible.  
This element of the decision has been appealed by certain third  
parties before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation).  
In late May 2013, and after several years of discussions, TOTAL  
reached settlements with the U.S. authorities (a Deferred Prosecution  
Agreement with the DoJ and a Cease and Desist Order with the  
SEC). These settlements, which put an end to these investigations,  
were concluded without admission of guilt and in exchange for  
TOTAL respecting a number of obligations, including the payment  
of a fine ($245.2 million) and civil compensation ($153 million)  
that occurred during the second quarter of 2013. The reserve  
of $398.2 million that was booked in the financial statements  
as of June 30, 2012, has been fully released. By virtue of these  
settlements, TOTAL also accepted to appoint a French independent  
compliance monitor to review the Group’s compliance program  
and to recommend possible improvements.  
The Court of Appeal considered, however, that the explosion was  
the result of the chemical accident described by the court-appointed  
experts. Accordingly, it convicted the former Plant Manager and  
Grande Paroisse. This element of the decision has been appealed  
by the former Plant Manager and Grande Paroisse before the  
French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), which has the effect  
of suspending their criminal sentences.  
A compensation mechanism for victims was set up immediately  
following the explosion. 2.3 billion was paid for the compensation  
of claims and related expenses amounts. A 12.7 million reserve  
remains booked in the Group’s Consolidated Financial Statements  
as of December 31, 2013.  
With respect to the same facts, TOTAL and its Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer, who was President of the Middle East at the time  
of the facts, were placed under formal investigation in France  
following a judicial inquiry initiated in 2006. In late May 2013, the  
Prosecutor’s office recommended that the case be sent to trial.  
The investigating magistrate has not yet issued his decision.  
Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee –  
Russian regions and Interneft  
Blue Rapid, a Panamanian company, and the Russian Olympic  
Committee filed a claim for damages with the Paris Commercial  
Court against Elf Aquitaine, alleging a so-called non-completion  
by a former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine of a contract related to an  
exploration and production project in Russia negotiated in the early  
At this point, the Company considers that the resolution of these  
cases is not expected to have a significant impact on the Group’s  
financial situation or consequences for its future planned  
operations.  
1990s. Elf Aquitaine believed this claim to be unfounded and  
opposed it. On January 12, 2009, the Commercial Court of Paris  
rejected Blue Rapid’s claim against Elf Aquitaine and found that the  
Russian Olympic Committee did not have standing in the matter.  
Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee appealed this  
decision. On June 30, 2011, the Court of Appeal of Paris dismissed  
as inadmissible the claim of Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic  
Committee against Elf Aquitaine, notably on the grounds of the  
contract having lapsed. Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic  
Committee appealed this decision to the French Supreme Court.  
Libya  
In June 2011, the United States Securities and Exchange  
Commission (SEC) issued to certain oil companies – including,  
among others, TOTAL – a formal request for information related to  
their operations in Libya. In April 2013, the SEC notified TOTAL of  
the closure of the investigation while stating that it does not intend  
to take further action as far as TOTAL is concerned.  
Oil-for-Food Program  
In connection with the same facts, and fifteen years after the  
termination of the exploration and production contract, a Russian  
company, which was held not to be the contracting party to the  
contract, and two regions of the Russian Federation that were not  
even parties to the contract, launched an arbitration procedure  
against the aforementioned former subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine that was  
liquidated in 2005, claiming alleged damages of U.S.$22.4 billion.  
For the same reasons as those successfully adjudicated by Elf  
Aquitaine against Blue Rapid and the Russian Olympic Committee,  
the Group considers this claim to be unfounded as a matter of law  
and fact. The Group has lodged a criminal complaint to denounce  
the fraudulent claim of which the Group believes it is a victim and,  
has taken and reserved its rights to take other actions and  
measures to defend its interests.  
Several countries have launched investigations concerning  
possible violations related to the United Nations (UN) Oil-for-Food  
Program in Iraq.  
Pursuant to a French criminal investigation, certain current or  
former Group Employees were placed under formal criminal  
investigation for possible charges as accessories to the  
misappropriation of Corporate assets and as accessories to the  
corruption of foreign public agents. The Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer of the Company, formerly President of the Group’s  
Exploration & Production division, was also placed under formal  
investigation in October 2006. In 2007, the criminal investigation  
was closed and the case was transferred to the Prosecutor’s office.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
323  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
In 2009, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the investigating  
magistrate that the case against the Group’s current and former  
employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
not be pursued.  
judge of Potenza served notice to Total Italia of a decision that  
would suspend the concession for this field for one year. Total Italia  
has appealed the decision by the preliminary investigation judge  
before the Court of Appeal of Potenza. In a decision dated April 8,  
2
009, the Court reversed the suspension of the concession and  
In early 2010, despite the recommendation of the Prosecutor’s  
office, a new investigating magistrate, having taken over the case,  
decided to indict TOTAL S.A. on bribery charges as well as  
complicity and influence peddling. The indictment was brought  
eight years after the beginning of the investigation without any  
new evidence being introduced.  
appointed for one year, i.e., until February 16, 2010, a judicial  
administrator to supervise the operations related to the development  
of the concession, allowing the Tempa Rossa project to continue.  
The criminal investigation was closed in the first half of 2010. In  
May 2012, the Judge of the preliminary hearing decided to dismiss  
the charges against some of the Group’s employees and to refer  
the case for trial for a reduced number of charges. The trial started  
on September 26, 2012.  
In October 2010, the Prosecutor’s office recommended to the  
investigating magistrate that the case against TOTAL S.A., the  
Group’s former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer not be pursued. However, by ordinance notified  
in early August 2011, the investigating magistrate on the matter  
decided to send the case to trial. On July 8, 2013, TOTAL S.A.,  
the Group’s former employees and TOTAL’s Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer were cleared of all charges by the Criminal Court,  
which found that none of the offenses for which they had been  
prosecuted were established. On July 18, 2013, the Prosecutor’s  
office appealed the parts of the Criminal Court’s decision acquitting  
TOTAL S.A. and certain of the Group’s former employees. TOTAL’s  
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s acquittal issued on July 8,  
In 2010, Total Italia’s exploration and production operations were  
transferred to Total E&P Italia and refining and marketing operations  
were merged with those of Erg Petroli.  
Rivunion  
On July 9, 2012, the Swiss Tribunal Fédéral (Switzerland’s Supreme  
Court) rendered a decision against Rivunion, a wholly-owned  
subsidiary of Elf Aquitaine, confirming a tax reassessment in the  
amount of CHF 171 million (excluding interest for late payment).  
According to the Tribunal, Rivunion was held liable as tax collector  
of withholding taxes owed by the beneficiaries of taxable services.  
Rivunion, in liquidation since March 12, 2002, unable to recover  
the amounts corresponding to the withholding taxes in order to  
meet its fiscal obligations, has been subject to insolvency  
proceedings since November 1, 2012. On August 29, 2013,  
the Swiss federal tax administration lodged a claim as part of  
the insolvency proceedings of Rivunion, for an amount of  
CHF 284 million, including CHF 171 million of principal as well  
as interest for late payment.  
2013 is irrevocable since the Prosecutor’s office did not appeal  
this part of the Criminal Court’s decision.  
Italy  
As part of an investigation led by the Prosecutor of the Republic  
of the Potenza Court, Total Italia and certain Group employees are  
the subject of an investigation related to certain calls for tender that  
Total Italia made for the preparation and development of an oil field.  
On February 16, 2009, as a preliminary measure before the  
proceedings go before the Court, the preliminary investigation  
33) Other information  
Research and development costs incurred by the Group in 2013  
amounted to 949 million (805 million in 2012 and 776 million in  
The staff dedicated in 2013 to these research and development  
activities are estimated at 4,684 people (4,110 in 2012 and 3,946  
in 2011).  
2011), corresponding to 0.5% of the sales.  
34) Changes in progress in the Group structure  
Upstream  
– TOTAL has put up for sale its interest in Block 15/06 in Angola.  
At December 31, 2013 the assets and liabilities have been  
respectively classified in the Consolidated balance sheet in  
TOTAL announced in November 2012 the finalization of an  
agreement for the sale in Nigeria of its 20% interest in Block  
OML 138 to a subsidiary of China Petrochemical Corporation  
“Assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of 526 million  
and “Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as  
held for sale” for an amount of 36 million. The assets  
concerned mainly include tangible assets for an amount of  
(Sinopec). This transaction remains subject to the approval by  
the relevant authorities. At December 31, 2013 the assets and  
liabilities have been respectively retained in the Consolidated  
balance sheet in “Assets classified as held for sale” for an  
amount of 1,833 million and “Liabilities directly associated  
with the assets classified as held for sale” for an amount of  
456 million. In February 2014, TOTAL signed an agreement to  
sell to Sonangol E&P its interest in Block 15/06. This transaction  
remains subject to the approval by the relevant authorities.  
590 million. The assets concerned mainly include tangible  
assets for an amount of 1,468 million.  
324  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
35) Consolidation scope  
As of December 31, 2013, 898 entities are consolidated of which 809 are fully consolidated and 89 are accounted for under equity method (E).  
The table below sets forth the main Group consolidated entities:  
Business  
segment  
Statutory corporate name  
% Group  
interest  
Method  
Country of  
incorporation  
Country of  
operations  
Upstream  
Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company Ltd  
Angola Block 14 B.V.  
Angola LNG Limited  
Brass Holdings Company Limited  
Brass LNG Ltd  
Dolphin Energy Limited  
E. F. Oil And Gas Limited  
Elf Exploration Production  
Elf Exploration UK Limited  
Elf Petroleum Iran  
Elf Petroleum UK Limited  
Gaz Transport & Technigaz S.A.S.  
Ichthys LNG PTY Ltd  
5.00%  
50.01%  
13.60%  
100.00%  
17.00%  
24.50%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
30.00%  
30.00%  
15.00%  
16.96%  
5.54%  
E
E
United Arab Emirates  
The Netherlands  
Bermuda  
Luxembourg  
Nigeria  
United Arab Emirates  
United Kingdom  
France  
United Kingdom  
France  
United Kingdom  
France  
Australia  
Nigeria  
Russia  
United Arab Emirates  
Angola  
Angola  
Luxembourg  
Nigeria  
United Arab Emirates  
United Kingdom  
France  
United Kingdom  
Iran  
United Kingdom  
France  
Australia  
Nigeria  
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Nigeria LNG Ltd  
Novatek  
Oman LNG LLC  
PetroCedeño  
Russia  
Oman  
Venezuela  
Oman  
Venezuela  
30.32%  
Qatar Liquefied  
Gas Company Limited (II) Train B  
Qatargas Liquefied Gas Company Limited  
Shtokman Development AG  
TOTAL (BTC) S.A.R.L.  
TOTAL Austral  
TOTAL Coal South Africa (PTY) Ltd  
TOTAL Colombia Pipeline  
TOTAL Dolphin Midstream Limited  
Total E&P Absheron B.V.  
Total E&P Algerie  
16.70%  
10.00%  
25.00%  
E
E
E
Qatar  
Qatar  
Qatar  
Qatar  
Russia  
Luxembourg  
Argentina  
South Africa  
Colombia  
Bermuda  
Azerbaijan  
Algeria  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Angola  
Switzerland  
Luxembourg  
France  
South Africa  
France  
Bermuda  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
Bermuda  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
France  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
85.00%  
Total E&P Angola  
Total E&P Angola Block 15/06 Limited  
Total E&P Angola Block 17/06  
Total E&P Angola Block 25  
Total E&P Angola Block 32  
Total E&P Angola Block 33  
Total E&P Angola Block 39  
Total E&P Angola Block 40  
Total E&P Arctic Russia  
Total E&P Australia  
France  
Australia  
Australia  
Australia  
Azerbaijan  
Bolivia  
Total E&P Australia II  
Total E&P Australia III  
Total E&P Azerbaijan B.V.  
Total E&P Bolivie  
Total E&P Borneo B.V.  
Total E&P Bulgaria B.V.  
Total E&P Canada Ltd  
Total E&P Chine  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
Canada  
France  
France  
Brunei  
Bulgaria  
Canada  
China  
Colombia  
Congo  
Total E&P Colombie  
Total E&P Congo  
Congo  
Total E&P Cyprus B.V.  
Total E&P Do Brasil LTDA  
Total E&P Dolphin Upstream Limited  
Total E&P France  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
The Netherlands  
Brazil  
Bermuda  
France  
Cyprus  
Brazil  
Qatar  
France  
Bermuda  
Total E&P Golfe Holdings Limited  
Bermuda  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
325  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Business  
segment  
Statutory corporate name  
% Group  
interest  
Method  
Country of  
incorporation  
Country of  
operations  
Upstream  
Total E&P Golfe Limited  
Total E&P Guyane Francaise  
Total E&P Ichthys  
Total E&P Ichthys B.V.  
Total E&P Indonesia West Papua  
Total E&P Indonesie  
Total E&P Iraq  
Total E&P Italia  
Total E&P Kazakhstan  
Total E&P Kenya B.V.  
Total E&P Kurdistan Region of Iraq (Harir) B.V.  
Total E&P Kurdistan Region of Iraq (Safen) B.V.  
Total E&P Libye  
Total E&P Madagascar  
Total E&P Malaysia  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
58.28%  
United Arab Emirates  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
France  
Italy  
France  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
France  
Qatar  
France  
Australia  
Australia  
Indonesia  
Indonesia  
Iraq  
Italy  
Kazakhstan  
Kenya  
Iraq  
Iraq  
Libya  
Madagascar  
Malaysia  
Morocco  
Mauritania  
Mauritania  
Mozambique  
Myanmar  
The Netherlands  
Nigeria  
Nigeria  
Nigeria  
Norway  
Oman  
Total E&P Maroc  
Total E&P Mauritanie  
France  
France  
Total E&P Mauritanie Block TA29 B.V.  
Total E&P Mozambique B.V.  
Total E&P Myanmar  
Total E&P Nederland B.V.  
Total E&P Nigeria Deepwater D Limited  
Total E&P Nigeria Deepwater E Limited  
Total E&P Nigeria Ltd  
Total E&P Norge AS  
Total E&P Oman  
Total E&P Qatar  
Total E&P Russie  
Total E&P South Africa B.V.  
Total E&P South East Mahakam  
Total E&P Syrie  
Total E&P Thailand  
Total E&P Uganda B.V.  
Total E&P UK Limited  
Total E&P Uruguay B.V.  
Total E&P USA Inc.  
Total E&P Vietnam  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
France  
The Netherlands  
Nigeria  
Nigeria  
Nigeria  
Norway  
France  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
Qatar  
Russia  
South Africa  
Indonesia  
Syria  
Thailand  
Uganda  
United Kingdom  
Uruguay  
United States  
Vietnam  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
United Kingdom  
The Netherlands  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
France  
Total E&P Yamal  
Total E&P Yemen  
TOTAL Énergie Gaz  
TOTAL Exploration M’Bridge B.V.  
TOTAL Exploration Production Nigeria  
TOTAL Gabon  
Yemen  
France  
Angola  
France  
Gabon  
Gabon  
TOTAL Gas & Power Actifs Industriels  
TOTAL Gas & Power Limited  
TOTAL Gas & Power North America Inc.  
TOTAL Gasandes  
TOTAL Gaz & Électricité Holdings France  
TOTAL GLNG Australia  
TOTAL Holding Dolphin Amont Limited  
TOTAL Holdings International B.V.  
TOTAL Holdings Nederland B.V.  
TOTAL LNG Angola  
TOTAL LNG Nigeria Ltd  
TOTAL Midstream Holdings UK Limited  
TOTAL Oil And Gas South America  
TOTAL Oil And Gas Venezuela B.V.  
TOTAL Participations Pétrolières Gabon  
TOTAL Petroleum Angola  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
France  
France  
United Kingdom  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
Bermuda  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
France  
Bermuda  
United Kingdom  
France  
The Netherlands  
Gabon  
France  
United Kingdom  
United States  
France  
France  
Australia  
Bermuda  
The Netherlands  
The Netherlands  
France  
Bermuda  
United Kingdom  
France  
Venezuela  
Gabon  
Angola  
326  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 10  
Business  
segment  
Statutory corporate name  
% Group  
interest  
Method  
Country of  
incorporation  
Country of  
operations  
Upstream  
TOTAL Profils Pétroliers  
TOTAL Qatar Oil And Gas  
TOTAL Shtokman B.V.  
TOTAL Upstream Nigeria Limited  
TOTAL Upstream UK Limited  
TOTAL Venezuela  
TOTAL Yemen LNG Company Limited  
Yamal LNG  
Yemen LNG Company Ltd  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
33.59%  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
Nigeria  
United Kingdom  
France  
Bermuda  
Russia  
Bermuda  
France  
France  
The Netherlands  
Nigeria  
United Kingdom  
France  
Bermuda  
Russia  
Yemen  
E
E
39.62%  
Refining & Chemicals  
Atlantic Trading & Marketing Inc.  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
40.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
50.00%  
United States  
China  
The Netherlands  
Germany  
Taiwan  
United States  
France  
United States  
United Kingdom  
France  
United States  
United States  
United States  
Switzerland  
United States  
China  
The Netherlands  
Germany  
Taiwan  
United States  
France  
United States  
United Kingdom  
France  
United States  
United States  
United States  
Switzerland  
Atotech (China) Chemicals Ltd  
Atotech B.V.  
Atotech Deutschland GmbH  
Atotech Taiwan  
BASF TOTAL Petrochemicals LLC  
Bostik Holding S.A.  
Bostik Inc.  
Bostik Ltd  
Bostik S.A.  
Cosden LLC  
Cos-Mar Company  
Cray Valley USA LLC  
CSSA – Chartering and Shipping Services S.A.  
Dalian West  
100.00%  
100.00%  
Pacific Petrochemical Co. Ltd (WEPEC)  
Grande Paroisse S.A.  
22.41%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
50.00%  
E
China  
France  
Argentina  
Mexico  
United States  
Brazil  
Germany  
Poland  
France  
United States  
United States  
France  
China  
France  
Argentina  
Mexico  
United States  
Brazil  
Germany  
Poland  
France  
United States  
United States  
France  
Hutchinson Argentina S.A.  
Hutchinson Autopartes De Mexico SA.DE. CV  
Hutchinson Corporation  
Hutchinson Do Brasil S.A.  
Hutchinson GmbH  
Hutchinson Poland SP Z.O.O.  
Hutchinson S.A.  
Legacy Site Services LLC  
LSS Funding Inc.  
Naphtachimie  
Paulstra SNC  
100.00%  
20.00%  
49.09%  
France  
Qatar  
Qatar  
South Korea  
France  
Qatar  
Qatar  
South Korea  
Qatar Petrochemical Company Q.S.C. (QAPCO)  
Qatofin Company Limited  
Samsung Total Petrochemicals Co. Ltd  
Saudi Aramco Total Refining  
and Petrochemical Company  
Sigmakalon Group B.V.  
TOTAL Deutschland GmbH(a)  
TOTAL Downstream UK PLC  
TOTAL Lindsey Oil Refinery Ltd  
TOTAL Olefins Antwerp  
TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining USA Inc.(a)  
TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining S.A./NV(a)  
TOTAL Petrochemicals France  
TOTAL Raffinaderij Antwerpen NV  
TOTAL Raffinage Chimie  
TOTAL Raffinage France  
TOTAL Raffinerie Mitteldeutschland GmbH  
TOTAL UK Limited(a)  
E
E
E
50.00%  
37.50%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
55.00%  
E
Saudi Arabia  
The Netherlands  
Germany  
United Kingdom  
United Kingdom  
Belgium  
United States  
Belgium  
France  
Belgium  
France  
France  
Germany  
Saudi Arabia  
The Netherlands  
Germany  
United Kingdom  
United Kingdom  
Belgium  
United States  
Belgium  
France  
Belgium  
France  
France  
Germany  
United Kingdom  
Switzerland  
The Netherlands  
United Kingdom  
Switzerland  
The Netherlands  
TOTSA Total Oil Trading S.A.  
Zeeland Refinery N.V.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
327  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
10  
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Business  
segment  
Statutory corporate name  
% Group  
interest  
Method  
Country of  
incorporation  
Country of  
operations  
Marketing & Services  
Air Total International S.A.  
100.00%  
17.88%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
50.00%  
Switzerland  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
United States  
Belgium  
China  
Germany  
France  
France  
Switzerland  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
United States  
Belgium  
China  
Germany  
France  
France  
Amyris Inc.  
AS 24  
E
E
Compagnie Pétrolière de l’Ouest - CPO  
Société Anonyme de la Raffinerie des Antilles  
SunPower Corporation  
TOTAL Belgium  
TOTAL China Investment Co. Ltd  
TOTAL Deutschland GmbH(a)  
TOTAL Énergie Développement  
TOTAL Énergies Nouvelles Activités USA  
TOTAL Especialidades Argentina  
TOTAL Guinea Ecuatorial  
TOTAL Holding Asie  
64.65%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
80.00%  
Argentina  
Equatorial Guinea  
France  
Argentina  
Equatorial Guinea  
France  
100.00%  
93.96%  
TOTAL Kenya  
Kenya  
Kenya  
TOTAL Lubrifiants  
99.98%  
France  
France  
TOTAL Marketing Middle East Free Zone  
TOTAL Marketing Services  
TOTAL Maroc  
TOTAL Mineraloel Und Chemie GmbH  
TOTAL Oil Turkiye AS  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
50.10%  
United Arab Emirates  
France  
Morocco  
Germany  
Turkey  
United Arab Emirates  
France  
Morocco  
Germany  
Turkey  
TOTAL Outre-Mer  
France  
France  
TOTAL Specialties USA Inc.  
TOTAL South Africa (PTY) Ltd  
TOTAL UK Limited(a)  
TOTAL Vostok  
TotalErg SPA  
United States  
South Africa  
United Kingdom  
Russia  
United States  
South Africa  
United Kingdom  
Russia  
100.00%  
100.00%  
49.00%  
E
Italy  
Italy  
Corporate  
Elf Aquitaine  
Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants  
Elf Aquitaine Inc.  
Omnium Reinsurance Company S.A.  
SOCAP S.A.S.  
Société Civile Immobilière CB2  
SOFAX Banque  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
100.00%  
N/A  
France  
France  
United States  
Switzerland  
France  
France  
France  
France  
Canada  
France  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
France  
France  
United States  
Switzerland  
France  
France  
France  
France  
Canada  
France  
United States  
France  
France  
France  
TOTAL Capital  
TOTAL Capital Canada Ltd  
TOTAL Capital International  
TOTAL Delaware Inc.  
Total E&P Holdings  
TOTAL Finance  
TOTAL Finance Exploitation  
TOTAL Finance Global Services S.A.  
TOTAL Finance USA Inc.  
TOTAL Funding Nederland B.V.  
TOTAL Gestion Filiales  
TOTAL Gestion USA  
TOTAL Holdings EUROPE  
TOTAL Holdings UK Limited  
TOTAL Holdings USA Inc.  
TOTAL International NV  
TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining USA Inc.(a)  
TOTAL Petrochemicals & Refining S.A./NV(a)  
TOTAL S.A.  
Belgium  
Belgium  
United States  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
France  
United Kingdom  
United States  
The Netherlands  
United States  
Belgium  
United States  
The Netherlands  
France  
France  
France  
United Kingdom  
United States  
The Netherlands  
United States  
Belgium  
France  
France  
TOTAL Treasury  
TOTAL UK Finance Ltd  
100.00%  
100.00%  
France  
United Kingdom  
France  
United Kingdom  
(a) Multi-segment entities.  
328  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
9.Informations complémentaires sur l’ aS cu t pi v pi tl ée md eh ny t da rl oo ci la ar bn ud r eg sa s( ni on nf o ar mu da itt i éo en s () unaudited)  
11  
Supplemental oil and gas information  
(unaudited)  
1.  
Oil and gas information pursuant  
to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
330  
1.1.  
1.2.  
1.3.  
1.4.  
1.5.  
1.6.  
1.7.  
1.8.  
1.9.  
Preparation of reserves estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .330  
Proved developed reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .330  
Proved undeveloped reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .331  
Estimated proved reserves of oil, bitumen and gas reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .331  
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .339  
Cost incurred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .341  
Capitalized costs related to oil and gas producing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .342  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (excluding transportation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .343  
Changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .345  
2.  
Other information  
346  
2.1.  
Net gas production, production prices and production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .346  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
329  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
1
. Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB  
Accounting Standards Codification 932  
Proved reserves estimates are calculated according to the  
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 4-10 of  
Regulation S-X set forth in the “Modernization of Oil and Gas  
Reporting” release (SEC Release n° 33-8995) and the Financial  
Accounting Standard Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update  
regarding Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas (ASC 932), which  
provide definitions and disclosure requirements.  
1.1. Preparation of reserves estimates  
The estimation of reserves is an ongoing process which is done  
within affiliates by experienced geoscientists, engineers and  
economists under the supervision of each affiliate’s General  
Management. Staff involved in reserves evaluation are trained  
to follow SEC-compliant internal guidelines and policies regarding  
criteria that must be met before reserves can be considered  
as proved.  
– At the end of the annual review carried out by the Development  
Division, a SEC Reserves Committee chaired by the Exploration  
& Production Senior Vice President Corporate Affairs and  
comprised of the Development, Exploration, Strategy and Legal  
Senior Vice Presidents, or their representatives, as well  
as the Chairman of the Technical Reserves Committee and  
the Reserves Vice-President, approves the SEC reserve booking  
proposals regarding criteria that are not dependent upon reservoir  
and geosciences techniques. The results of the annual review  
and the proposals for including revisions or additions of SEC  
Proved Reserves are presented to the Exploration & Production  
Executive Committee for approval before final validation by the  
Group Executive Management.  
The technical validation process relies on a Technical Reserves  
Committee that is responsible for approving proved reserves  
changes above a certain threshold and technical evaluations  
of reserves associated with an investment decision that requires  
approval from the Exploration & Production Executive Committee.  
The Chairman of the Technical Reserves Committee is appointed  
by the Senior Management of Exploration & Production and its  
members represent expertise in reservoir engineering, production  
geology, production geophysics, drilling, and development studies.  
The reserves evaluation and control process is audited periodically  
by the Group’s internal auditors who verify the effectiveness of the  
reserves evaluation process and control procedures.  
An internal control process related to reserves estimation is well  
established within TOTAL and involves the following elements:  
The reserves Vice-President (RVP) is the technical person  
responsible for preparing the reserves estimates for the Group.  
Appointed by the President of Exploration & Production, the RVP  
supervises the Reserve Entity, chairs the annual review of reserves,  
and is a member of the Technical Reserves Committee and the  
SEC Reserves Committee. The RVP has over thirty years of  
experience in the oil & gas industry. He previously held several  
management positions in the Group in reservoir engineering and  
geosciences, and has more than fifteen years of experience in  
the field of reserves evaluation and control process. He holds an  
engineering degree from Institut National des Sciences Appliquées,  
Lyon, France, and a petroleum engineering degree from École  
Nationale Supérieure du Pétrole et des Moteurs (IFP School),  
France. He is a member and past Chairman of the Society of  
Petroleum Engineers Oil and Gas Reserves Committee and a  
member of the UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for  
Europe) Expert Group on Resource Classification.  
A central Reserve Entity whose responsibility is to consolidate,  
document and archive the Group’s reserves; to ensure coherence  
of evaluations worldwide; to maintain the Corporate Reserves  
Guidelines Standards in line with SEC guidelines and policies;  
to deliver training on reserves evaluation and classification;  
and to conduct periodically in-depth technical review of reserves  
for each affiliate.  
An annual review of affiliates reserves conducted by an internal  
group of specialists selected for their expertise in geosciences  
and engineering or their knowledge of the affiliate. All members  
of this group chaired by the Reserves Vice-President and  
composed of at least three Technical Reserves Committee  
members are knowledgeable in the SEC guidelines for proved  
reserves evaluation. Their responsibility is to provide an  
independent review of reserves changes proposed by affiliates  
and ensure that reserves are estimated using appropriate  
standards and procedures.  
1.2. Proved developed reserves  
At the end of 2013, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were  
,674 Mboe and represented 49% of the proved reserves.  
At the end of 2012, proved developed reserves of oil and gas  
were 5,789 Mboe and represented 51% of the proved reserves.  
At the end of 2011, proved developed reserves of oil and gas were  
6,046 Mboe and represented 53% of the proved reserves.  
Over the past three years, the yearly average of proved  
developed reserves renewal has remained above 800 Mboe,  
illustrating TOTAL’s ability to consistently transfer proved  
undeveloped reserves into developed status.  
5
330  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.3. Proved undeveloped reserves  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL’s combined proved undeveloped  
reserves of oil and gas were 5,852 Mboe as compared to 5,579 Mboe  
at the end of 2012. The net increase of 273 Mboe of proved  
undeveloped reserves is due to the addition of 946 Mboe of  
undeveloped reserves related to extensions and discoveries,  
the revision of -278 Mboe of previous estimates, a net increase  
of 44 Mboe due to acquisitions/divestitures, and the transfer of  
more than five years from the time of recording proved reserves  
to the start of production. These specific projects represent  
approximately 20% of the Group’s proved undeveloped reserves  
and include deep offshore developments in Angola, Nigeria and  
the United Kingdom and development of oil sands in Canada.  
These projects are highly complex to develop due to a combination  
of factors that include, among others, the nature of the reservoir  
rock and fluid properties, challenging operating environments and  
the size of the projects. In addition, some of these projects are  
generally designed and optimized for a given production capacity  
that controls the pace at which the field is developed and the wells  
are drilled. At production start-up, only a portion of the proved  
reserves are developed in order to deliver sufficient production  
potential to meet capacity constraints and contractual obligations.  
The remaining PUD’s associated with the complete development  
plan will therefore remain undeveloped for more than five years  
following project approval and booking. Under these specific  
circumstances, the Group believes that it is justified to report  
as proved reserves the level of reserves used in connection with  
the approved project, despite the fact that some of these PUDs  
may remain undeveloped for more than five years. In addition,  
TOTAL has demonstrated in recent years the Group’s ability to  
successfully develop and bring into production similar large scale  
and complex projects, including the development of deep-offshore  
fields in Angola, Nigeria, the Republic of Congo, HP/HT fields in the  
United Kingdom, heavy oil projects in Venezuela and LNG projects  
in Qatar, Yemen, Nigeria and Indonesia.  
439 Mboe from proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed  
reserves. Negative revision of previous estimates results from a  
perimeter change in the gas feed of an LNG plant in Africa and the  
postponement of a debottlenecking phase and a performance  
study performed on a field located in America. In 2013, the cost  
incurred to develop proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) was  
15.0 billion, which represents 83% of 2013 development costs  
incurred, and was related to projects located for the most part in  
Angola, Australia, Canada, Congo, Gabon, Nigeria, Norway, and  
United Kingdom.  
Approximately 51% of the Group’s proved undeveloped reserves  
are associated with producing projects and are located for the most  
part in Canada, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, Norway, Russia, and Venezuela.  
These reserves are expected to be developed over time as part  
of initial field development plans or additional development phases.  
The timing to bring these proved reserves into production will depend  
upon several factors including reservoir performance, surface facilities  
or plant capacity constraints and contractual limitations on production  
level. The remaining proved undeveloped reserves correspond to  
undeveloped fields or assets for which a development has been  
sanctioned or is in progress.  
The tables provided below are presented by the following  
geographic areas: Europe, Africa, the Americas, Middle East and  
Asia (including CIS).  
The Group’s portfolio of projects includes a few large scale and  
complex developments for which it anticipates that it may take  
1.4. Estimated proved reserves of oil, bitumen and gas reserves  
The following tables present, for oil, bitumen and gas reserves,  
an estimate of the Group’s oil, bitumen and gas quantities by  
geographic areas as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.  
All references in the following tables to reserves or production  
are to the Group’s entire share of such reserves or production.  
TOTAL’s worldwide proved reserves include the proved reserves  
of its consolidated subsidiaries as well as its proportionate share  
of the proved reserves of equity affiliates.  
Quantities shown correspond to proved developed and  
undeveloped reserves together with changes in quantities for  
2
013, 2012 and 2011.  
The definitions used for proved, proved developed and proved  
undeveloped oil and gas reserves are in accordance with the  
revised Rule 4-10 of SEC Regulation S-X.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
331  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
1.4.1. Changes in oil, bitumen and gas reserves  
(in million barrels of oil equivalent)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
1,706  
3,371  
1,540  
574  
1,099  
8,290  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
117  
57  
44  
(61)  
6
-
(65)  
(237)  
(36)  
-
309  
-
(68)  
-
-
(19)  
588  
2
(67)  
651  
355  
(65)  
(648)  
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(187)  
(75)  
(56)  
(93)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
1,737  
3,014  
1,738  
450  
1,577  
8,516  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
64  
67  
32  
(38)  
(156)  
65  
173  
-
(71)  
(261)  
7
110  
-
(8)  
(77)  
(23)  
29  
-
15  
43  
-
128  
422  
32  
(117)  
(618)  
-
-
Production for the year  
(34)  
(90)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
1,706  
2,920  
1,770  
422  
1,545  
8,363  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
18  
12  
-
(51)  
(143)  
(97)  
20  
-
44  
135  
-
(51)  
(74)  
11  
2
-
48  
227  
132  
-
24  
396  
132  
(102)  
(588)  
-
-
Production for the year  
(243)  
(31)  
(97)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
1,542  
2,600  
1,824  
404  
1,855  
8,225  
Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of  
December 31, 2011  
December 31, 2012  
-
-
98  
99  
-
-
-
-
-
-
98  
99  
December 31, 2013  
-
159  
-
-
-
159  
(in million barrels of oil equivalent)  
Equity affiliates  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
-
107  
486  
1,812  
-
2,405  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
(1)  
-
-
(24)  
(4)  
(8)  
-
-
(4)  
(18)  
(20)  
-
-
(11)  
(152)  
-
-
(29)  
-
779  
(39)  
(209)  
779  
-
(35)  
Production for the year  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
-
78  
456  
1,629  
744  
2,907  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
(39)  
-
-
5
-
-
-
78  
158  
118  
-
46  
158  
118  
-
-
Production for the year  
(15)  
(146)  
(63)  
(224)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
-
80  
402  
1,488  
1,035  
3,005  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
(3)  
-
-
-
(1)  
(141)  
(3)  
14  
-
33  
622  
117  
(92)  
(73)  
(114)  
636  
117  
(92)  
(251)  
-
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(13)  
(164)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
-
76  
248  
1,335  
1,642  
3,301  
332  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
(in million barrels of oil equivalent)  
Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
1,737  
3,092  
2,194  
2,079  
2,321  
11,423  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
1,737  
-
3,014  
78  
1,738  
456  
450  
1,629  
1,577  
744  
8,516  
2,907  
Proved developed reserves  
894  
1,660  
647  
1,869  
976  
6,046  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
894  
-
1,639  
21  
524  
123  
371  
1,498  
321  
655  
3,749  
2,297  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
843  
1,432  
1,547  
210  
1,345  
5,377  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
843  
-
1,375  
57  
1,214  
333  
79  
131  
1,256  
89  
4,767  
610  
As of December 31, 2012  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
1,706  
3,000  
2,172  
1,910  
2,580  
11,368  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
1,706  
-
2,920  
80  
1,770  
402  
422  
1,488  
1,545  
1,035  
8,363  
3,005  
Proved developed reserves  
827  
1,584  
616  
1,718  
1,044  
5,789  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
827  
-
1,563  
21  
475  
141  
349  
1,369  
313  
731  
3,527  
2,262  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
879  
1,416  
1,556  
192  
1,536  
5,579  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
879  
-
1,357  
59  
1,295  
261  
73  
119  
1,232  
304  
4,836  
743  
As of December 31, 2013  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
1,542  
2,676  
2,072  
1,739  
3,497  
11,526  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
1,542  
-
2,600  
76  
1,824  
248  
404  
1,335  
1,855  
1,642  
8,225  
3,301  
Proved developed reserves  
766  
1,469  
540  
1,577  
1,322  
5,674  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
766  
-
1,452  
17  
452  
88  
330  
1,247  
560  
762  
3,560  
2,114  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
776  
1,207  
1,532  
162  
2,175  
5,852  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
776  
-
1,148  
59  
1,372  
160  
74  
88  
1,295  
880  
4,665  
1,187  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
333  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
1.4.2. Changes in oil reserves  
The oil reserves include crude oil, condensates and natural gas liquids.  
(in million barrels)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
792  
2,350  
79  
239  
554  
4,014  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
49  
17  
42  
-
(19)  
6
-
(57)  
(185)  
9
-
-
(33)  
-
-
(24)  
58  
-
(18)  
81  
42  
(57)  
(328)  
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(88)  
(15)  
(25)  
(15)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
812  
2,095  
73  
181  
573  
3,734  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
20  
27  
7
(32)  
(72)  
61  
148  
-
(45)  
(210)  
10  
8
-
(2)  
(12)  
2
28  
-
10  
6
-
103  
217  
7
(79)  
(329)  
-
-
Production for the year  
(21)  
(14)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
762  
2,049  
77  
190  
575  
3,653  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
19  
6
-
(49)  
(60)  
50  
19  
-
7
20  
-
(6)  
(12)  
7
2
-
75  
21  
34  
-
158  
68  
34  
(55)  
(302)  
-
-
Production for the year  
(194)  
(20)  
(16)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
678  
1,924  
86  
179  
689  
3,556  
Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of  
December 31, 2011  
December 31, 2012  
-
-
88  
87  
-
-
-
-
-
-
88  
87  
December 31, 2013  
-
140  
-
-
-
140  
(in million barrels)  
Equity affiliates  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
-
34  
470  
680  
-
1,184  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
(22)  
(4)  
(6)  
-
-
(4)  
(17)  
(12)  
-
-
(12)  
(91)  
-
-
51  
-
(16)  
-
51  
(38)  
(115)  
Production for the year  
(3)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
-
10  
443  
565  
48  
1,066  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
(40)  
-
-
5
-
-
9
51  
11  
-
(21)  
51  
11  
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(15)  
(93)  
(5)  
(113)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
-
15  
388  
477  
114  
994  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
(3)  
-
-
-
-
(138)  
(6)  
-
-
(4)  
32  
13  
-
(151)  
32  
13  
-
-
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(13)  
(99)  
(7)  
(119)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
-
12  
237  
372  
148  
769  
334  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
(in million barrels)  
Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
812  
2,105  
516  
746  
621  
4,800  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
812  
-
2,095  
10  
73  
443  
181  
565  
573  
48  
3,734  
1,066  
Proved developed reserves  
351  
1,206  
165  
565  
91  
2,378  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
351  
-
1,202  
4
48  
117  
116  
449  
50  
41  
1,767  
611  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
461  
899  
351  
181  
530  
2,422  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
461  
-
893  
6
25  
326  
65  
116  
523  
7
1,967  
455  
As of December 31, 2012  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
761  
2,065  
465  
667  
689  
4,647  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
761  
-
2,050  
15  
77  
388  
190  
477  
575  
114  
3,653  
994  
Proved developed reserves  
289  
1,145  
179  
506  
110  
2,229  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
289  
-
1,139  
6
44  
135  
133  
373  
55  
55  
1,660  
569  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
472  
920  
286  
161  
579  
2,418  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
472  
-
911  
9
33  
253  
57  
104  
520  
59  
1,993  
425  
As of December 31, 2013  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
678  
1,936  
323  
551  
837  
4,325  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
678  
-
1,924  
12  
86  
237  
179  
372  
689  
148  
3,556  
769  
Proved developed reserves  
274  
1,068  
128  
419  
304  
2,193  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
274  
-
1,064  
4
45  
83  
119  
300  
235  
69  
1,737  
456  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
404  
868  
195  
132  
533  
2,132  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
404  
-
860  
8
41  
154  
60  
72  
454  
79  
1,819  
313  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
335  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
1.4.3. Changes in bitumen reserves  
(in million barrels)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
-
-
789  
-
-
789  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(109)  
-
308  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(109)  
-
308  
-
Production for the year  
(4)  
(4)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
-
-
984  
-
-
984  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43  
15  
-
-
(4)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
43  
15  
-
-
(4)  
Production for the year  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
-
-
1,038  
-
-
1,038  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
53  
-
-
(5)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
53  
-
-
(5)  
Production for the year  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
1,088  
-
-
1,088  
Proved developed reserves as of  
December 31, 2011  
December 31, 2012  
-
-
-
-
21  
18  
-
-
-
-
21  
18  
December 31, 2013  
-
-
15  
-
-
15  
Proved undeveloped reserves as of  
December 31, 2011  
December 31, 2012  
-
-
-
-
963  
1,020  
-
-
-
-
963  
1,020  
December 31, 2013  
-
-
1,073  
-
-
1,073  
There are no bitumen reserves for equity affiliates.  
There are no minority interests for bitumen reserves.  
336  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.4.4. Changes in gas reserves  
(in billion cubic feet)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
4,962  
5,314  
3,806  
1,867  
3,194  
19,143  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
358  
211  
11  
(216)  
-
367  
-
7
(180)  
1
2,824  
13  
330  
3,035  
31  
(46)  
(1,718)  
-
-
-
-
-
(46)  
(259)  
-
-
Production for the year  
(528)  
(317)  
(169)  
(445)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
5,014  
4,793  
3,863  
1,518  
5,587  
20,775  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
268  
216  
138  
(30)  
(462)  
31  
127  
-
(173)  
(257)  
(278)  
478  
-
(35)  
(337)  
(132)  
15  
195  
-
(96)  
1,022  
138  
(238)  
(1,564)  
6
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(75)  
(433)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
5,144  
4,521  
3,691  
1,317  
5,364  
20,037  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
(6)  
27  
1
(13)  
(450)  
(887)  
12  
199  
336  
-
(243)  
(320)  
29  
-
-
(186)  
1,074  
506  
(851)  
1,449  
507  
(256)  
(1,544)  
-
-
-
-
Production for the year  
(248)  
(68)  
(458)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
4,703  
3,398  
3,663  
1,278  
6,300  
19,342  
Minority interest in proved developed and undeveloped reserves as of  
December 31, 2011  
December 31, 2012  
-
-
62  
57  
-
-
-
-
-
-
62  
57  
December 31, 2013  
-
87  
-
-
-
87  
(in billion cubic feet)  
Equity affiliates  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2010  
-
390  
91  
6,164  
-
6,645  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
(16)  
-
-
(10)  
(1)  
(10)  
-
-
-
(2)  
(31)  
-
-
-
-
-
(57)  
-
3,865  
(10)  
3,865  
-
(167)  
Production for the year  
(331)  
(501)  
Balance as of December 31, 2011  
-
363  
79  
5,802  
3,698  
9,942  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
(21)  
-
-
-
(1)  
5
-
-
-
(2)  
(4)  
-
-
-
366  
578  
568  
-
346  
578  
568  
-
Production for the year  
(287)  
(304)  
(594)  
Balance as of December 31, 2012  
-
341  
82  
5,511  
4,906  
10,840  
Revisions of previous estimates  
Extensions, discoveries and other  
Acquisitions of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
-
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
-
(6)  
(18)  
-
-
-
(2)  
16  
77  
-
191  
3,209  
553  
(485)  
(345)  
197  
3,286  
553  
(485)  
(707)  
-
Production for the year  
(354)  
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
-
343  
62  
5,250  
8,029  
13,684  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
337  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
(in billion cubic feet)  
Consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
5,014  
5,156  
3,942  
7,320  
9,285  
30,717  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
5,014  
-
4,793  
363  
3,863  
79  
1,518  
5,802  
5,587  
3,698  
20,775  
9,942  
Proved developed reserves  
2,943  
2,308  
2,600  
7,170  
4,854  
19,875  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,943  
-
2,216  
92  
2,567  
33  
1,450  
5,720  
1,594  
3,260  
10,770  
9,105  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
2,071  
2,848  
1,342  
150  
4,431  
10,842  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,071  
-
2,577  
271  
1,296  
46  
68  
82  
3,993  
438  
10,005  
837  
As of December 31, 2012  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
5,144  
4,862  
3,773  
6,828  
10,270  
30,877  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
5,144  
-
4,521  
341  
3,691  
82  
1,317  
5,511  
5,364  
4,906  
20,037  
10,840  
Proved developed reserves  
2,927  
2,192  
2,356  
6,656  
5,115  
19,246  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,927  
-
2,110  
82  
2,316  
40  
1,240  
5,416  
1,526  
3,589  
10,119  
9,127  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
2,217  
2,670  
1,417  
172  
5,155  
11,631  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,217  
-
2,411  
259  
1,375  
42  
77  
95  
3,838  
1,317  
9,918  
1,713  
As of December 31, 2013  
Proved developed and undeveloped reserves  
4,703  
3,741  
3,725  
6,528  
14,329  
33,026  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
4,703  
-
3,398  
343  
3,663  
62  
1,278  
5,250  
6,300  
8,029  
19,342  
13,684  
Proved developed reserves  
2,687  
2,009  
2,240  
6,366  
5,514  
18,816  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,687  
-
1,937  
72  
2,210  
30  
1,210  
5,156  
1,834  
3,680  
9,878  
8,938  
Proved undeveloped reserves  
2,016  
1,732  
1,485  
162  
8,815  
14,210  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Equity affiliates  
2,016  
-
1,461  
271  
1,453  
32  
68  
94  
4,466  
4,349  
9,464  
4,746  
338  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.5. Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities  
The following tables do not include revenues and expenses related to oil and gas transportation activities and LNG liquefaction and  
transportation activities.  
(M)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Revenues Non-Group sales  
Revenues Group sales  
3,116  
7,057  
3,188  
11,365  
776  
764  
1,159  
737  
3,201  
712  
11,440  
20,635  
Total Revenues  
10,173  
14,553  
1,540  
1,896  
3,913  
32,075  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
(1,235)  
(343)  
(1,179)  
(323)  
(250)  
(48)  
(286)  
(11)  
(304)  
(294)  
(3,254)  
(1,019)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses(a)  
(1,336)  
(307)  
(1,845)  
(1,181)  
(352)  
(274)  
(278)  
(276)  
(791)  
(95)  
(4,602)  
(2,133)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
6,952  
(5,059)  
1,893  
10,025  
(6,484)  
3,541  
616  
(293)  
323  
1,045  
(465)  
580  
2,429  
(1,302)  
1,127  
21,067  
(13,603)  
7,464  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
2012  
Revenues Non-Group sales  
Revenues Group sales  
1,986  
6,857  
4,388  
13,440  
968  
639  
723  
1,010  
3,509  
790  
11,574  
22,736  
Total Revenues  
8,843  
17,828  
1,607  
1,733  
4,299  
34,310  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
(1,318)  
(483)  
(1,442)  
(365)  
(297)  
(339)  
(340)  
(18)  
(395)  
(241)  
(3,792)  
(1,446)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses(a)  
(1,986)  
(326)  
(2,574)  
(1,356)  
(1,558)  
(386)  
(458)  
(159)  
(938)  
(128)  
(7,514)  
(2,355)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
4,730  
(3,478)  
1,252  
12,091  
(7,383)  
4,708  
(973)  
226  
758  
(386)  
372  
2,597  
(1,264)  
1,333  
19,203  
(12,285)  
6,918  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
(747)  
2013  
Revenues Non-Group sales  
Revenues Group sales  
1,634  
5,834  
3,445  
12,101  
1,003  
608  
812  
679  
3,483  
761  
10,377  
19,983  
Total Revenues  
7,468  
15,546  
1,611  
1,491  
4,244  
30,360  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
(1,327)  
(363)  
(1,486)  
(439)  
(313)  
(406)  
(375)  
(124)  
(440)  
(301)  
(3,941)  
(1,633)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses(a)  
(1,368)  
(371)  
(2,585)  
(1,188)  
(914)  
(327)  
(546)  
(80)  
(1,274)  
(137)  
(6,687)  
(2,103)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
4,039  
(2,726)  
1,313  
9,848  
(6,235)  
3,613  
(349)  
42  
366  
(316)  
50  
2,092  
(1,061)  
1,031  
15,996  
(10,296)  
5,700  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
(307)  
(a) Included production taxes and accretion expense as provided for by IAS 37 (338 million in 2011, 391 million in 2012, 426 million in 2013).  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
339  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
(M)  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Non-Group sales  
Group sales  
-
-
26  
-
15  
831  
1,080  
6,804  
256  
-
1,377  
7,635  
Total Revenues  
-
26  
846  
7,884  
256  
9,012  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
-
-
(7)  
-
(48)  
-
(250)  
-
(28)  
(4)  
(333)  
(4)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses  
-
-
(7)  
-
(44)  
(550)  
(225)  
(6,101)  
(109)  
(36)  
(385)  
(6,687)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
-
-
-
12  
-
204  
(95)  
109  
1,308  
(285)  
79  
(34)  
45  
1,603  
(414)  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
12  
1,023  
1,189  
2012  
Non-Group sales  
Group sales  
-
-
-
-
-
1,085  
7,850  
780  
(323)  
1,865  
8,761  
1,234  
Total Revenues  
-
-
1,234  
8,935  
457  
10,626  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
-
-
-
-
(125)  
-
(289)  
-
(88)  
(3)  
(502)  
(3)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses  
-
-
-
-
(60)  
(754)  
(299)  
(6,924)  
(227)  
(54)  
(586)  
(7,732)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
-
-
-
-
-
-
295  
(63)  
232  
1,423  
(303)  
85  
(51)  
34  
1,803  
(417)  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
1,120  
1,386  
2013  
Non-Group sales  
Group sales  
-
-
-
-
-
1,521  
7,748  
569  
10  
2,090  
8,510  
752  
Total Revenues  
-
-
752  
9,269  
579  
10,600  
Production costs  
Exploration expenses  
-
-
-
-
(81)  
-
(362)  
-
(41)  
(2)  
(484)  
(2)  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Other expenses  
-
-
-
-
(34)  
(481)  
(350)  
(6,741)  
(194)  
(91)  
(578)  
(7,313)  
Pre-tax income from producing activities  
Income tax  
-
-
-
-
-
-
156  
(77)  
79  
1,816  
(410)  
251  
(83)  
168  
2,223  
(570)  
Results of oil and gas producing activities  
1,406  
1,653  
340  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.6. Cost incurred  
The following tables set forth the costs incurred in the Group’s oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities,  
including both capitalized and expensed amounts. They do not include costs incurred related to oil and gas transportation and LNG  
liquefaction and transportation activities.  
(M)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
298  
1
505  
2,352  
10  
397  
384  
413  
1,692  
254  
2
3
17  
251  
14  
417  
974  
2,107  
1,577  
Development costs(a)  
3,895  
1,314  
329  
2,823  
10,713  
Total cost incurred  
3,156  
4,686  
3,673  
351  
3,505  
15,371  
2012  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
202  
40  
598  
27  
1,362  
578  
-
384  
571  
-
176  
35  
12  
26  
340  
241  
1,988  
2,122  
Development costs(a)  
3,183  
4,330  
1,830  
307  
3,331  
12,981  
Total cost incurred  
4,023  
6,297  
2,785  
518  
3,709  
17,332  
2013  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
-
13  
511  
131  
386  
669  
-
1,584  
441  
2
64  
174  
349  
367  
64  
408  
500  
2,111  
2,203  
Development costs(a)  
3,945  
6,434  
2,403  
4,212  
17,343  
Total cost incurred  
4,469  
7,620  
4,428  
589  
5,051  
22,157  
(M)  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
2,691  
1,116  
-
2,691  
1,116  
2
Development costs(a)  
2
106  
314  
939  
1,361  
Total cost incurred  
-
2
108  
314  
4,746  
5,170  
2012  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
238  
(22)  
-
238  
(22)  
-
Development costs(a)  
167  
380  
202  
749  
Total cost incurred  
-
-
167  
380  
418  
965  
2013  
Proved property acquisition  
Unproved property acquisition  
Exploration costs  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
206  
106  
-
206  
106  
-
Development costs(a)  
128  
345  
241  
714  
Total cost incurred  
-
-
128  
345  
553  
1,026  
(a) Including asset retirement costs capitalized during the year and any gains or losses recognized upon settlement of asset retirement obligation during the year.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
341  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
1.7. Capitalized costs related to oil and gas producing activities  
Capitalized costs represent the amount of capitalized proved and unproved property costs, including support equipment and facilities, along  
with the related accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization.  
The following tables do not include capitalized costs related to oil and gas transportation and LNG liquefaction and transportation activities.  
(M)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
34,308  
460  
37,032  
1,962  
8,812  
4,179  
6,229  
62  
17,079  
911  
103,460  
7,574  
Total capitalized costs  
34,768  
(24,047)  
10,721  
38,994  
(18,642)  
20,352  
12,991  
(2,294)  
10,697  
6,291  
(4,274)  
2,017  
17,990  
(5,066)  
12,924  
111,034  
(54,323)  
56,711  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
As of December 31, 2012  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
35,456  
543  
40,562  
3,184  
10,108  
4,324  
6,408  
248  
20,463  
612  
112,997  
8,911  
Total capitalized costs  
35,999  
(23,660)  
12,339  
43,746  
(20,364)  
23,382  
14,432  
(3,219)  
11,213  
6,656  
(4,648)  
2,008  
21,075  
(5,872)  
15,203  
121,908  
(57,763)  
64,145  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
As of December 31, 2013  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
36,482  
644  
44,760  
3,661  
10,878  
5,715  
6,483  
349  
23,869  
814  
122,472  
11,183  
Total capitalized costs  
37,126  
(23,354)  
13,772  
48,421  
(21,955)  
26,466  
16,593  
(3,814)  
12,779  
6,832  
(4,961)  
1,871  
24,683  
(6,844)  
17,839  
133,655  
(60,928)  
72,727  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
(M)  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
-
-
-
-
731  
-
3,496  
-
3,973  
1,146  
8,200  
1,146  
Total capitalized costs  
-
-
-
-
731  
(96)  
3,496  
(2,337)  
1,159  
5,119  
(213)  
9,346  
(2,646)  
6,700  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
-
-
635  
4,906  
As of December 31, 2012  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
-
-
-
-
1,049  
-
3,637  
-
4,074  
1,118  
8,760  
1,118  
Total capitalized costs  
-
-
-
-
1,049  
(177)  
872  
3,637  
(2,540)  
1,097  
5,192  
(457)  
9,878  
(3,174)  
6,704  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
-
-
4,735  
As of December 31, 2013  
Proved properties  
Unproved properties  
-
-
-
-
891  
-
3,939  
-
4,567  
1,224  
9,397  
1,224  
Total capitalized costs  
-
-
-
-
891  
(161)  
730  
3,939  
(2,911)  
1,028  
5,791  
(646)  
10,621  
(3,718)  
6,903  
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Net capitalized costs  
-
-
5,145  
342  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.8. Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows  
(excluding transportation)  
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating  
to proved oil and gas reserve quantities was developed as follows:  
– future net cash flows are discounted at a standard discount rate  
of 10 percent.  
estimates of proved reserves and the corresponding production  
profiles are based on existing technical and economic conditions;  
These principles applied are those required by ASC 932 and  
do not reflect the expectations of real revenues from these reserves,  
nor their present value; hence, they do not constitute criteria for  
investment decisions. An estimate of the fair value of reserves should  
also take into account, among other things, the recovery of reserves  
not presently classified as proved, anticipated future changes in  
prices and costs and a discount factor more representative of the  
time value of money and the risks inherent in reserves estimates.  
the estimated future cash flows are determined based on prices  
used in estimating the Group’s proved oil and gas reserves;  
the future cash flows incorporate estimated production costs  
(including production taxes), future development costs and asset  
retirement costs. All cost estimates are based on year-end  
technical and economic conditions;  
future income taxes are computed by applying the year-end  
statutory tax rate to future net cash flows after consideration  
of permanent differences and future income tax credits; and  
(M)  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Future cash inflows  
85,919  
(18,787)  
(21,631)  
(28,075)  
167,367  
(31,741)  
(22,776)  
(71,049)  
53,578  
(22,713)  
(11,548)  
(4,361)  
14,297  
(3,962)  
(3,110)  
(2,794)  
67,868  
(12,646)  
(11,044)  
(12,963)  
389,029  
(89,849)  
(70,109)  
(119,242)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
17,426  
41,801  
(17,789)  
24,012  
14,956  
(12,298)  
2,658  
4,431  
(2,186)  
2,245  
31,215  
(20,717)  
10,498  
109,829  
(62,416)  
47,413  
Discount at 10%  
(9,426)  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 8,000  
As of December 31, 2012  
Future cash inflows  
93,215  
(20,337)  
(24,490)  
(27,393)  
177,392  
(39,091)  
(28,896)  
(68,017)  
58,140  
(25,824)  
(12,949)  
(4,456)  
16,474  
(5,213)  
(3,807)  
(2,732)  
70,985  
(15,218)  
(10,954)  
(12,641)  
416,206  
(105,683)  
(81,096)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
(115,239)  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
20,995  
41,388  
(17,731)  
23,657  
14,911  
(11,608)  
3,303  
4,722  
(2,227)  
2,495  
32,172  
(19,969)  
12,203  
114,188  
(62,084)  
52,104  
Discount at 10%  
(10,549)  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 10,446  
As of December 31, 2013  
Future cash inflows  
80,779  
(18,859)  
(23,058)  
(20,621)  
155,371  
(38,160)  
(25,951)  
(55,303)  
59,517  
(27,316)  
(14,231)  
(3,919)  
14,660  
(5,249)  
(3,234)  
(2,288)  
72,297  
(15,106)  
(12,910)  
(11,453)  
382,624  
(104,690)  
(79,384)  
(93,584)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
18,241  
35,957  
(14,649)  
21,308  
14,051  
(11,557)  
2,494  
3,889  
(1,880)  
2,009  
32,828  
(20,932)  
11,896  
104,966  
(57,184)  
47,782  
Discount at 10%  
(8,166)  
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 10,075  
Minority interests in future net cash flows as of  
(M)  
As of December 31, 2011  
As of December 31, 2012  
-
-
558  
501  
-
-
-
-
-
-
558  
501  
As of December 31, 2013  
-
610  
-
-
-
610  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
343  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932  
(M)  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
As of December 31, 2011  
Future cash inflows  
-
-
-
-
210  
(95)  
-
29,887  
(17,393)  
(1,838)  
(5,152)  
64,977  
(39,800)  
(2,809)  
(3,942)  
7,116  
(2,683)  
(1,297)  
(2,280)  
102,190  
(59,971)  
(5,944)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
(29)  
(11,403)  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
-
86  
(36)  
50  
5,504  
(3,652)  
1,852  
18,426  
(9,757)  
8,669  
856  
(196)  
660  
24,872  
(13,641)  
11,231  
Discount at 10%  
-
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows  
As of December 31, 2012  
-
Future cash inflows  
-
-
-
-
2,103  
(99)  
-
27,439  
(17,250)  
(2,360)  
(3,353)  
64,234  
(35,830)  
(2,967)  
(5,430)  
9,390  
(3,265)  
(3,906)  
(648)  
103,166  
(56,444)  
(9,233)  
(9,823)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
(392)  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
Discount at 10%  
-
1,612  
(1,087)  
525  
4,476  
(2,978)  
1,498  
20,007  
(10,316)  
9,691  
1,571  
(955)  
616  
27,666  
(15,336)  
12,330  
-
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows  
As of December 31, 2013  
-
Future cash inflows  
-
-
-
-
1,009  
(105)  
-
14,870  
(9,043)  
(1,265)  
(2,164)  
56,541  
(29,094)  
(2,558)  
(5,076)  
28,121  
(9,481)  
(3,866)  
(1,653)  
100,541  
(47,723)  
(7,689)  
(9,155)  
Future production costs  
Future development costs  
Future income taxes  
(262)  
Future net cash flows, after income taxes  
Discount at 10%  
-
642  
(480)  
162  
2,398  
(1,413)  
985  
19,813  
(10,121)  
9,692  
13,121  
(12,316)  
805  
35,974  
(24,330)  
11,644  
-
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows  
-
344  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Oil and gas information pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 932 11  
1.9. Changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
(M)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Beginning of year  
36,033  
47,413  
52,104  
Sales and transfers, net of production costs  
Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production costs and other expenses  
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery  
Changes in estimated future development costs  
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year  
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  
Accretion of discount  
(27,026)  
44,315  
1,680  
(4,798)  
9,519  
1,288  
3,603  
(16,925)  
885  
(28,552)  
7,382  
1,357  
(6,503)  
11,809  
2,719  
4,741  
13,992  
299  
(24,742)  
(7,651)  
835  
(8,158)  
13,757  
1,141  
5,210  
15,238  
1,102  
Net change in income taxes  
Purchases of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
(1,161)  
(2,553)  
(1,054)  
End of year  
47,413  
52,104  
47,782  
Equity affiliates  
(M)  
2011  
2012  
2013  
Beginning of year  
9,234  
11,231  
12,330  
Sales and transfers, net of production costs  
Net change in sales and transfer prices and in production costs and other expenses  
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery  
Changes in estimated future development costs  
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the year  
Revisions of previous quantity estimates  
Accretion of discount  
Net change in income taxes  
Purchases of reserves in place  
Sales of reserves in place  
(1,991)  
3,715  
-
(383)  
635  
(749)  
923  
(1,341)  
1,812  
(624)  
(1,885)  
(743)  
(25)  
(495)  
809  
(2,775)  
(1,196)  
3,761  
408  
831  
984  
(3,792)  
1,233  
836  
393  
(385)  
1,123  
1,314  
17  
-
End of year  
11,231  
12,330  
11,644  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
345  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
11  
Other information  
2. Other information  
2.1. Net gas production, production prices and production costs  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
1,350  
607  
839  
424  
1,162  
4,382  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
74.24  
-
6.58  
74.72  
-
1.81  
55.13  
31.36  
2.06  
73.73  
-
0.54  
68.76  
-
7.45  
73.34  
31.36  
4.72  
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
6.86  
-
5.14  
-
3.41  
20.70  
5.36  
-
3.40  
-
5.20  
20.70  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2011  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
-
-
-
891  
457  
1,348  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
-
-
-
66.21  
61.15  
77.07  
-
1.29  
30.75  
-
0.95  
73.61  
-
1.23  
-
-
-
-
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
-
-
1.99  
-
2.75  
-
1.66  
-
0.79  
-
1.61  
-
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2012  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
1,166  
593  
901  
171  
1,123  
3,955  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
79.82  
-
7.10  
82.65  
-
2.19  
61.85  
35.27  
2.23  
81.05  
-
0.90  
75.49  
-
8.35  
80.84  
35.27  
5.31  
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
8.78  
-
5.69  
-
3.92  
24.00  
10.76  
-
4.61  
-
6.36  
24.00  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2012  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
-
-
-
769  
813  
1,583  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
105.12  
83.26  
-
1.35  
28.27  
-
0.95  
83.27  
-
1.23  
-
-
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
-
-
-
-
8.84  
-
1.98  
-
1.44  
-
2.27  
-
346  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)  
Other information 11  
Consolidated subsidiaries  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2013  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
1,134  
569  
860  
149  
1,193  
3,905  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
73.60  
-
7.17  
77.30  
-
2.00  
49.65  
34.43  
2.66  
74.22  
-
0.85  
70.22  
-
7.64  
74.80  
34.43  
5.28  
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
9.72  
-
6.31  
-
4.27  
23.90  
12.93  
-
4.77  
-
6.96  
23.90  
Equity affiliates  
Europe  
Africa  
Americas  
Middle East  
Asia  
Total  
2013  
Natural gas production available for sale (Mcf/d)(a)  
-
-
-
935  
927  
1,862  
Production prices(b)  
Oil (/b)  
Bitumen (/b)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
62.10  
-
0.00  
78.62  
-
1.78  
38.88  
-
0.81  
74.57  
-
1.47  
Natural gas (/kcf)  
Production costs per unit of production (/boe)(c)  
Total liquids and natural gas  
Bitumen  
-
-
-
-
6.25  
-
2.24  
-
0.59  
-
1.97  
-
(
(
(
a) The reported volumes are different from those shown in the reserves table due to gas consumed in operations.  
b) The volumes used for calculation of the average sales prices are the ones sold from the Group’s own production.  
c) The volumes of liquids used for this computation are shown in the proved reserves tables of this report. The reported volumes for natural gas are different from those shown in the reserves  
table due to gas consumed in operations.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
347  
348  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
11.  
TOTAL S.A.  
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
TOTAL S.A.  
The Statutory Financial Statements were approved by the Board of Directors on February 11, 2014 and have not been updated  
with subsequent events.  
1.  
2.  
3.  
Statutory auditors’ report on regulated agreements and commitments  
Statutory auditor’s report on the annual financial statements  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. as parent company  
350  
352  
353  
3.1.  
3.2.  
3.3.  
3.4.  
Statement of income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .353  
Balance sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .354  
Statement of cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .355  
Statement of changes in shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .356  
4.  
Notes  
357  
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
0)  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
5)  
6)  
7)  
8)  
9)  
0)  
1)  
2)  
3)  
4)  
Accounting policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .357  
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .357  
Subsidiaries and affiliates: investments and loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .358  
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .359  
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .359  
Shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .360  
Contingency reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .361  
Employee benefits obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .361  
Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .362  
Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .363  
Currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .363  
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .363  
Net operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .363  
Operating depreciation, amortization and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .364  
Financial expenses and income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .364  
Dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .364  
Other financial income and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .364  
Non-recurring income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .365  
Basis of taxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .365  
Foreign exchange and counterparty risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .365  
Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .366  
Average number of employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .366  
Stock option, restricted share and free share plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .367  
Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .370  
5.  
Other financial information concerning the parent company  
371  
5.1.  
5.2.  
5.3.  
5.4.  
Subsidiaries and affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .371  
Five-year financial data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .372  
Proposed allocation of 2013 income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .372  
Statement of changes in share capital for the past five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .373  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
349  
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Statutory auditors’ report on regulated agreements and commitments  
1
. Statutory auditors’ report on regulated  
agreements and commitments  
This is a free translation into English of a report issued in French and is provided solely for the convenience of English-speaking readers. This report  
should be read in conjunction and construed in accordance with French law and the relevant professional auditing standards applicable in France.  
Shareholders’ meeting on the approval of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013  
To the Shareholders,  
In our capacity as statutory auditors of your Company, we hereby present to you our report on the regulated agreements and commitments.  
We are required to inform you, on the basis of the information provided to us, of the terms and conditions of those agreements and commitments  
indicated to us or those that we have found in the course of our engagement. We are not required to comment as to whether they are beneficial  
or appropriate nor to ascertain whether any other agreements and commitments exist. It is your responsibility, in accordance with Article  
R.225-31 of the French Commercial Law (Code de commerce), to evaluate the benefits resulting from these agreements and commitments  
prior to their approval.  
In addition, we are required, if applicable, in accordance with Article R.225-31 of the French Commercial Law (Code de commerce), to inform  
you of the agreements and commitments, which were approved during previous years and which were applicable during the period.  
We performed the procedures we considered necessary in accordance with professional guidance issued by the national institute of auditors  
(“Compagnie nationale des commissaires aux comptes”), relating to this engagement. Our work consisted in verifying that the information  
provided to us is in agreement with the underlying documentation from which it was extracted.  
1. Agreements and commitments to be approved by the Shareholders’ meeting  
Agreements and commitments approved during the period  
We have not been advised of any agreements and commitments to be approved by the Shareholders’ meeting in accordance with Article  
L.225-38 of the French Commercial Law (Code de commerce).  
2. Agreements and commitments already approved by the Shareholders’ meeting  
Agreements and commitments already approved in previous years  
a) Which were applicable during the period  
In accordance with Article R.225-30 of the French Commercial Law (Code de commerce), we have been informed of the following  
agreement, which was already approved in previous years by the Shareholders’ meeting, and which was applicable during the period.  
Engagement concerning specific resources made available to the Honorary Chairman  
Director affected by the agreement or commitment:  
Mr. Thierry Desmarest, director and Honorary Chairman of your Company.  
Purpose of the agreement or commitment:  
Company resources made available for use by the Honorary Chairman.  
Terms and conditions of the agreement or commitment:  
In consideration of the representation missions of the Group which are entrusted to him, the following company resources are made  
available to the Honorary Chairman: an office, an administrative assistant, and a company vehicle with a driver.  
b) Which were not applicable during the period  
In addition, we have been informed of the continuance of the following commitments, regarding the retirement benefit, the supplementary  
pension plan and, under certain conditions, the severance benefit of Mr. Christophe de Margerie if his contract was terminated for removal  
from office or if his term of office was not renewed. These commitments were already approved by the Shareholders’ meeting in previous  
years and were not applicable during the period.  
Agreements concerning the pension plan  
Director affected by the agreement or commitment:  
Mr. Christophe de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
Purpose of the agreement or commitment:  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is entitled to the same retirement benefit and supplementary pension plan, as the concerned  
employees of TOTAL S.A.  
Terms and conditions of the agreement or commitment:  
-
Retirement benefit  
350  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
TOTAL S.A.  
Statutory auditors’ report on regulated agreements and commitments 12  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is entitled to retirement benefit equal to those available to eligible members of the Group under the  
French National Collective Bargaining Agreement for the Petroleum. This benefit amounts to 25% of the gross annual compensation  
(including both fixed and variable portions) of the twelve-month period preceding the retirement of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
The payment of this benefit is subject to performance conditions. These performance conditions are deemed to be met if at least two of the  
three following criteria are satisfied:  
-
-
The average ROE (Return on Equity) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the officer retires is at least 12%;  
The average ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which  
the officer retires is at least 10%;  
-
The Company’s oil and gas production growth rate over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the officer retires  
is greater than or equal to the average production growth rate of the four following companies: ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and Chevron.  
Supplementary defined-benefit pension plan  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also benefits from a supplementary defined-benefit pension plan which is applicable to all employees  
of the TOTAL Group whose annual compensation is greater than eight times the ceiling for calculating French social security contribution.  
Compensation above this amount does not qualify as pensionable compensation under either government-sponsored or contractual pension schemes.  
To be eligible for this supplementary pension plan, set up and financed by TOTAL S.A., participants must meet specific age and length of service  
(5 years) criteria. They must also still be employed by the Company upon retirement, unless they retire due to disability or had taken early  
retirement at the Group’s initiative after the age of 55.  
The plan provides participants with a pension equal to the sum of 1.8% of the portion of the reference compensation between eight  
and forty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security contributions, and 1% of the reference compensation between forty  
and sixty times the annual ceiling for calculating French social security contributions, which is multiplied by the number of years of service (up  
to twenty years).The basis for calculation for this supplementary plan is indexed to changes in the French Association for Complementary  
Pensions Schemes (ARRCO) index.  
The sum of the supplementary pension plan benefits and external pension plan benefits (other than those constituted individually and  
on a voluntary basis) may not exceed 45% of the last three-year average compensation. In the event this percentage is exceeded,  
the supplementary pension is reduced accordingly.  
For the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Group’s pension obligations are, as of December 31, 2013, the equivalent of an annual  
pension of 17.96% of his 2013 gross annual compensation (fixed portion for 2013 and variable portion for fiscal year 2012).  
Agreement in case the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is removed from office  
or in case his term of office is not renewed  
Director affected by the agreement or commitment:  
Mr. Christophe de Margerie, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  
Purpose of the agreement or commitment:  
If the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is removed from office or if his term of office is not renewed, he is eligible for a severance benefit.  
Terms and conditions of the agreement or commitment:  
This severance benefit is equal to two year’s gross compensation.  
The calculation of this severance benefit will be based on the gross compensation (including both fixed and variable portions) in the twelve-  
month period preceding the termination date or the non renewal of the Chief Executive Officer’s term.  
The severance benefits that may be paid upon a change of control or a change of strategy decided by the Company are cancelled in the  
case of gross negligence or willful misconduct or if the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer leaves the Company of his own volition,  
accepts new responsibilities within the Group, or may claim full retirement benefits within a short time period.  
Entitlement to this severance benefit is subject to performance conditions. These performance conditions are deemed to be met if at least  
two of the three following criteria are satisfied:  
-
-
-
The average ROE (Return on Equity) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer retires is at least 12%;  
The average ROACE (Return on Average Capital Employed) over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the Chairman  
and Chief Executive Officer retires is at least 10%;  
The Company’s oil and gas production growth rate over the three years immediately preceding the year in which the Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer retires is greater than or equal to the average production growth rate of the four following companies:  
ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron.  
Paris La Défense, March 26, 2014  
The statutory auditors  
French original signed by  
KPMG Audit  
A division of KPMG S.A.  
Jay Nirsimloo  
ERNST & YOUNG Audit  
Pascal Macioce  
Partner  
Partner  
Laurent Vitse  
Partner  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
351  
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Statutory auditor’s report on the annual financial statements  
2
. Statutory auditor’s report  
on the annual financial statements  
This is a free translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the Financial Statements issued in French and it is provided solely for  
the convenience of English-speaking users.  
The statutory auditors’ report includes information specifically required by French law in such reports, whether modified or not.  
This information is presented below the audit opinion on the Financial Statements and includes an explanatory paragraph discussing  
the auditors’ assessments of certain significant accounting and auditing matters. These assessments were considered for the purpose  
of issuing an audit opinion on the Financial Statements taken as a whole and not to provide separate assurance on individual account  
balances, transactions or disclosures.  
This report also includes information relating to the specific verification of information given in the Management Report and in the documents  
addressed to the shareholders.  
This report should be read in conjunction with and construed in accordance with French law and professional auditing standards applicable  
in France.  
Year ended December 31, 2013  
To the Shareholders,  
In compliance with the assignment entrusted to us by your annual general meeting, we hereby report to you, for the year ended  
December 31, 2013, on:  
the audit of the accompanying financial statements of TOTAL S.A.;  
the justification of our assessments;  
the specific verifications and information required by law.  
These financial statements have been approved by the Board of Directors. Our role is to express an opinion on these financial  
statements based on our audit.  
I. Opinion on the financial statements  
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France; those standards require that we plan  
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  
An audit involves performing procedures, using sampling techniques or other methods of selection, to obtain audit evidence about  
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used  
and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made, as well as the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that  
the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.  
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the financial position of the Company  
as at December 31, 2013 and of the results of its operations for the year then ended in accordance with French accounting principles.  
II. Justification of our assessments  
In accordance with the requirements of Article L. 823-9 of the French commercial code (Code de commerce) relating to the justification of  
our assessments, we bring to your attention the following matters:  
We assessed the approaches used by your company to value investments in subsidiaries and affiliates as described in note 1 to the financial  
statements, and performed tests to verify the application of those methods. As part of our assessments and based on the information  
available to date, we also verified the reasonable nature of the estimates derived from these methods.  
These assessments were made as part of our audit of the financial statements taken as a whole, and therefore contributed to the opinion  
we formed which is expressed in the first part of this report.  
III. Specific verifications and information  
We have also performed, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the specific verifications required by French law.  
We have no matters to report as to the fair presentation and the consistency with the financial statements of the information given in the  
Management Report of the Board of Directors and in the documents addressed to the shareholders with respect to the financial position  
and the financial statements.  
Concerning the information given in accordance with the requirements of Article L. 225-102-1 of the French commercial code  
(
Code de commerce) relating to remunerations and benefits received by the directors and any other commitments made in their  
favour, we have verified its consistency with the financial statements, or with the underlying information used to prepare these financial  
statements and, where applicable, with the information obtained by your company from companies controlling your company or controlled  
by it. Based on this work, we attest the accuracy and fair presentation of this information.  
In accordance with French law, we have verified that the required information concerning the purchase of investments and controlling  
interests and the identity of the shareholders and holders of the voting rights has been properly disclosed in the Management Report.  
Paris-La Défense, March 6, 2014  
The statutory auditors  
French original signed by  
KPMG Audit  
A division of KPMG S.A.  
Jay Nirsimloo  
ERNST & YOUNG Audit  
Pascal Macioce  
Laurent Vitse  
352  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. as parent company 12  
3
. Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A.  
as parent company  
3.1. Statement of income  
As of December 31,  
(K)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Sales  
(Note 12) 16,749,337  
(Note 13) (13,001,765)  
16,446,200 14,246,392  
(13,012,996) (10,907,658)  
Net operating expenses  
Operating depreciation, amortization and allowances  
(Note 14)  
(137,490)  
(43,328)  
3,389,876  
(434,272)  
8,083,928 10,599,281  
(954,020)  
10,956  
(260,650)  
3,078,084  
(428,098)  
Operating income  
3,610,082  
Financial expenses and income  
Dividends  
Net depletion  
(Note 15)  
(Note 16)  
(238,685)  
7,355,028  
(1,084,247)  
(4,097)  
(839,231)  
(8,656)  
Other financial expenses and income  
(Note 17)  
Financial income  
Current income  
6,027,999  
9,638,081  
6,706,592  
10,096,468  
9,323,296  
12,401,380  
Gains (Losses) on sales of marketable securities and loans  
Gains (Losses) on sales of fixed assets  
Non-recurring items  
(29,092)  
68  
(7,813)  
(695)  
8,647  
(294,985)  
435,924  
43  
31,866  
Non-recurring income  
Employee profit-sharing plan  
Taxes  
(Note 18)  
(36,837)  
(287,033)  
467,833  
(65,301)  
(58,002)  
(52,073)  
(Note 19) (3,504,476)  
(3,231,651) (3,050,856)  
6,519,782 9,766,284  
Net income  
6,031,467  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
353  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. as parent company  
3.2. Balance sheet  
As of December 31,  
(K)  
ASSETS  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Non-current assets  
Intangible assets  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances  
Intangible assets, net  
957,956  
(452,175)  
505,781  
647,628  
(463,549)  
184,079  
943,112  
(381,620)  
561,492  
650,563  
(450,118)  
200,445  
89,228,333 87,744,158  
(699,995)  
45,084  
864,554  
(310,388)  
554,166  
585,783  
(406,249)  
179,534  
(Note 2)  
(Note 2)  
Property, plant and equipment  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances  
Property, plant and equipment, net  
Subsidiaries and affiliates: investments and loans  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization and valuation allowances  
Other non-current assets  
(Note 3) 94,094,092  
(Note 3)  
(Note 4)  
(828,041)  
45,120  
(574,296)  
63,008  
Investments and other non-current assets, net  
93,311,171  
88,573,422 87,232,870  
Total non-current assets  
94,001,031  
89,335,359  
87,966,570  
Current assets  
Inventories  
Operating receivables  
Marketable securities  
12,792  
3,329,771  
352,637  
11,390  
12,832  
2,356,568  
315,697  
12,498  
9,137  
3,495,789  
363,533  
38,047  
(Note 5)  
Cash/cash equivalents and short-term deposits  
Total current assets  
3,706,590  
2,697,595  
3,906,506  
Prepaid expenses  
Currency translation adjustments  
8,998  
273,523  
9,950  
5
15,649  
4
(Note 11)  
Total assets  
97,990,142  
92,042,909  
91,888,729  
As of December 31,  
(K)  
LIABILITIES  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Shareholders’ equity  
Share capital  
Paid-in surplus  
Reserves  
Retained earnings  
Net income  
Interim dividends  
(Note 6)  
5,944,195  
28,019,864  
3,950,632  
10,291,083  
6,031,467  
(4,213,343)  
5,914,833  
27,684,290 27,655,005  
3,958,588  
9,314,000  
6,519,782  
5,909,418  
(Note 6 B)  
3,986,875  
4,916,078  
9,766,284  
(4,161,373) (4,058,442)  
Total shareholders’ equity  
50,023,898  
49,230,120  
48,175,218  
Contingency reserves  
Debts  
(Notes 7 and 8)  
6,485,225  
5,812,262  
4,736,302  
Long-term loans  
Short-term loans  
Operating liabilities  
(Note 9) 27,188,369  
25,588,764 28,296,453  
(Note 9)  
9,779,762  
4,512,809  
7,375,394  
3,923,987  
6,541,883  
3,839,704  
(Note 10)  
Total debts  
41,480,940  
36,888,145  
38,678,040  
Accrued income  
-
806  
250  
Currency translation adjustments  
(Note 11)  
79  
111,576  
298,919  
Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity  
97,990,142  
92,042,909  
91,888,729  
354  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. as parent company 12  
3.3. Statement of cash flow  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Cash flow from operating activities  
Net income  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization  
Accrued expenses of investments  
Other provisions  
6,031  
127  
138  
675  
6,971  
29  
6,520  
122  
140  
1,076  
7,858  
(15)  
9,766  
110  
7
965  
10,848  
(436)  
(789)  
(4)  
Funds generated from operations  
(
(
Gains) Losses on disposal of assets  
Increase) Decrease in working capital  
(996)  
11  
782  
(18)  
Other, net  
Cash flow from operating activities  
6,015  
8,607  
9,619  
Cash flow used in investing activities  
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  
Purchase of investments and long-term loans  
Investments  
Proceeds from disposal of marketable securities and loans  
Total divestitures  
(77)  
(5,156)  
(5,233)  
448  
(160)  
(1,875)  
(2,035)  
662  
(82)  
(4,361)  
(4,443)  
2,419  
448  
662  
2,419  
Cash flow used in investing activities  
(4,785)  
(1,373)  
(2,024)  
Cash flow from financing activities  
Capital increase  
Share buybacks  
367  
-
31  
-
482  
-
Balance of cash dividends paid  
Cash interim dividends paid  
Repayment of long-term debt  
(2,807)  
(2,795)  
(127)  
4,131  
(2,684)  
(2,735)  
-
(2,685)  
(2,684)  
-
Increase (Decrease) in short-term borrowings and bank overdrafts  
(1,872)  
(2,811)  
Cash flow from financing activities  
(1,231)  
(7,260)  
(7,698)  
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end  
(1)  
12  
11  
(26)  
38  
12  
(103)  
141  
38  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
355  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Statutory Financial Statements of TOTAL S.A. as parent company  
3.4. Statement of changes in shareholders’ equity  
(M)  
Common shares issued  
General  
reserves  
and retained  
earnings  
Revaluation  
reserve  
Total  
Number  
Amount  
Issue  
premiums  
As of January 1, 2011  
2,349,640,931  
5,874  
27,208  
11,540  
48  
44,670  
Balance of cash dividends paid(a)  
Net income 2011  
-
-
-
-
-
-
13  
22  
-
-
-
-
(2,685)  
9,766  
(4,058)  
-
(2,685)  
9,766  
(4,058)  
173  
-
-
-
-
-
Cash interim dividends paid for 2011(b) (b)  
Issuance of common shares  
5,223,665  
8,902,717  
-
160  
288  
-
-
-
-
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
Changes in revaluation differences  
Expenses related to the capital increase  
reserved for employees  
310  
-
-
-
(1)  
-
-
(1)  
As of December 31, 2011  
2,363,767,313  
5,909  
27,655  
14,563  
48  
48,175  
Balance of cash dividends paid(c)  
Net income 2012  
-
-
-
-
-
2
4
-
-
-
-
29  
-
-
(1,311)  
6,520  
(4,161)  
-
-
-
-
-
(1,311)  
6,520  
(4,161)  
31  
Cash interim dividends paid for 2012(d) (d)  
-
798,883  
1,366,950  
-
Issuance of common shares  
-
(4)  
-
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
Changes in revaluation differences  
Expenses related to the capital increase  
reserved for employees  
-
(24)  
(24)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
As of December 31, 2012  
2,365,933,146  
5,915  
27,684  
15,607  
24  
49,230  
Balance of cash dividends paid(e)  
Net income 2013  
-
-
-
-
-
2
27  
-
-
-
-
(1,381)  
6,031  
(4,213)  
-
-
-
-
-
(1,381)  
6,031  
(4,213)  
35  
Cash interim dividends paid for 2013(f) (f)  
-
942,799  
10,802,215  
-
Issuance of common shares  
33  
305  
-
-
-
-
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
Changes in revaluation differences  
Expenses related to the capital increase  
reserved for employees  
332  
(8)  
(8)  
-
-
(2)  
-
-
(2)  
As of December 31, 2013  
2,377,678,160  
5,944  
28,020  
16,044  
16  
50,024  
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
a) Balance of the 2010 dividend paid in 2011: 2,685 million (1.14 per share).  
b) Interim dividend paid in 2011 for the 1st and 2 quarters 2011: 2,684 million (0.57 per share).  
nd  
rd  
b’)Interim dividend not paid in 2011 for the 3 quarter 2011: 1,374 million (0.57 per share).  
c) Balance of the 2011 dividend paid in 2012: 1,342 million (0.57 per share) reduced by 31 million for accounting adjustment, according to the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 11, 2012.  
st  
nd  
d) Interim dividend paid in 2012 for the 1 and 2 quarters 2012: 2,735 million (0.57 and 0.59 per share respectively).  
rd  
d’)Interim dividend not paid in 2012 for the 3 quarter 2012: 1,426 million (0.59 per share).  
e) Balance of the 2012 dividend paid in 2013: 1,398 million (0.59 per share) reduced by 17 million for accounting adjustment, according to the Shareholders’ Meeting on May 17, 2013.  
st  
nd  
f) Interim dividend paid in 2013 for the 1 and 2 quarters 2013: 2,795 million (0.59 per share).  
rd  
f’) Interim dividend not paid in 2013 for the 3 quarter 2013: 1,418 million (0.59 per share).  
356  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
4. Notes  
1) Accounting policies  
The 2013 financial statements have been prepared in accordance with  
French Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“French GAAP”).  
Inventories  
Inventories are valued at either the historical cost or the market value,  
whichever is lower. Cost for crude oil and refined product inventories  
is determined according to the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method.  
Property, plant and equipment  
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost with the  
exception of assets that were acquired before 1976 for which the  
basis has been revalued pursuant to French regulations.They are  
depreciated by the straight-line method over their estimated useful  
life, as follows:  
Receivables and payables  
Receivables and payables are stated at nominal value. Allowances  
for doubtful debts are recorded when the actual value is inferior to  
the book value.  
Buildings  
20 - 30 years  
5 - 10 years  
2 - 5 years  
5 - 10 years  
3 - 5 years  
Furniture and fixtures  
Transportation equipment  
Office equipment and furniture  
Computer equipment  
Foreign currency transactions  
Receivables and payables denominated in foreign currencies are  
translated into euros at the year-end exchange rate. Translation  
differences for non-hedged items are recorded under “Currency  
Translation adjustment” on the assets or liabilities side of the  
balance sheet. Unrealized exchange losses are recorded as  
provisions.  
Investments and loans to consolidated  
subsidiaries and equity affiliates  
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates are  
accounted for at the acquisition cost, or the appraised value for  
investments affected by the 1976 legal revaluation.  
Translation differences related to other foreign receivables and  
payables are recorded in the Statement of Income and offset by  
unrealized gains or losses from off-balance sheet hedging.  
Loans to consolidated subsidiaries and equity affiliates are stated  
at their nominal value.  
Financial instruments  
TOTAL S.A. uses financial instruments for hedging purposes only  
in order to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and  
foreign exchange rates.  
In the Upstream segment, in the absence of a development  
decision, allowances are recorded against investments and loans  
for an amount corresponding to the exploration costs incurred.  
When the existence of proved reserves is established, the value  
of the investments and loans is limited to the subsidiary expected  
pay-back evaluated at year-end.  
As part of this policy, the Company enters into interest rate swap  
agreements and forward transactions. The difference between  
interest to be paid and interest to be received on these swaps or  
premiums and discounts on these forward transactions is recognized  
as interest expense or interest income on a prorated basis, over the  
life of the instruments.  
For other segments, allowances for impairment in value are  
calculated by reference to the Company’s equity in the underlying  
net assets, the fair value and usefulness of the investment.  
2) Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
(M)  
Cost  
Depreciation, depletion  
and amortization  
and valuation allowances  
Net  
Net  
Headquarters(a)  
Branch (A.D.G.I.L.)(b)  
499  
459  
(348)  
(104)  
151  
355  
167  
394  
Total intangible assets  
958  
(452)  
506  
561  
Land  
Buildings  
Other  
36  
95  
517  
-
(59)  
(405)  
36  
36  
112  
36  
41  
124  
Total property, plant and equipment  
Total(c)  
648  
(464)  
(916)  
184  
690  
201  
762  
1,606  
(
a) Including ongoing DD&A for 25 million in 2013 and 15 million in 2012, software for a gross amount of 306 million in 2013 and 284 million in 2012, and other for a gross amount  
of 168 million in 2013 and 164 million in 2012.  
(
(
b) The subsidiaries’ depreciation, depletion and amortization related to commercial activity are accounted for as purchase cost of goods sold.  
c) As of December 31, 2012, aggregate cost, depreciation and valuation allowance amounted respectively to 1,594 million and 832 million.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
357  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
3) Subsidiaries and affiliates: investments and loans  
A) Changes in investments and loans  
As of December 31,  
2013  
(M)  
Gross amount  
at beginning  
of year  
Increases  
Decreases  
Monetary Non monetary  
Currency Gross amount  
translation  
adjustment  
at year-end  
Monetary Non monetary  
Investments(a)  
Receivables(b)  
77,991  
11,237  
2,987  
2,719  
1,645  
-
(57)  
(387)  
(1,643)  
(2)  
-
80,923  
13,171  
(396)  
Total  
89,228  
5,706  
1,645  
(444)  
(1,645)  
(396)  
94,094  
Analysis by segment  
Upstream  
Marketing & Services  
Refining & Chemicals  
Corporate  
5,875  
4,736  
13,823  
64,794  
178  
2,975  
274  
-
10  
1,635  
-
(205)  
(5)  
(16)  
(218)  
-
(10)  
-
-
5,838  
6,071  
15,716  
66,469  
(1,645)  
-
-
2,279  
(386)  
Total  
89,228  
5,706  
1,645  
(444)  
(1,645)  
(396)  
94,094  
(
(
a) The main changes in investments pertain to the acquisition of Total Marketing & Services securities and the contribution of Total Raffinage France securities.  
b) Changes in receivables mainly result from flows of funds with Total Finance and Total Treasury.  
B) Allowances for investments and loans  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
(M)  
Cost  
Valuation  
Net  
Net  
allowance  
Investments  
Receivables(a) (b)  
80,923  
13,171  
(520)  
(308)  
80,403  
12,863  
77,486  
11,042  
Total(c)  
94,094  
(828)  
93,266  
88,528  
Analysis by segment  
Upstream  
Marketing & Services  
Refining & Chemicals  
Corporate  
5,838  
6,071  
15,716  
66,469  
(494)  
(99)  
(224)  
(11)  
5,344  
5,972  
15,492  
66,458  
5,515  
4,654  
13,591  
64,768  
Total  
94,094  
(828)  
93,266  
88,528  
(
(
(
a) As of December 31, 2013, the gross amount included 12,741 million related to affiliates.  
b) As of December 31, 2013, the net amount was split into 3,273 million due in 12 months or less and 9,898 million due in more than 12 months.  
c) As of December 31, 2012, aggregate cost and valuation allowance amounted respectively to 89,228 million and 700 million.  
358  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
4) Other non-current assets  
A) Changes in other non-current assets  
As of December 31,  
2013  
(M)  
Gross amount  
at beginning  
of year  
Increases  
Decreases  
Monetary Non monetary  
Currency Gross amount  
translation  
adjustment  
at year-end  
Monetary Non monetary  
Investment portfolio  
Other non-current assets  
Deposits and guarantees  
4
24  
17  
-
32  
1
-
-
-
-
(24)  
(9)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
32  
9
Total  
45  
33  
-
(33)  
-
-
45  
B) Allowances for non-current assets  
As of December 31  
2013  
2012  
(M)  
Cost  
Valuation  
Net  
Net  
allowance  
Investment portfolio  
4
32  
9
-
-
-
4
32  
9
4
24  
17  
Other non-current assets(a)  
Deposits and guarantees  
Total(b)  
45  
-
45  
45  
(
(
a) As of December 31, 2013, the net amount is due in 12 months or less.  
b) As of December 31, 2012, aggregate cost and net amounts were equivalent.  
5) Accounts receivable  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
(M)  
Cost  
Valuation  
Net  
Net  
allowance  
Accounts receivable  
Other operating receivables  
1,418  
1,914  
-
(2)  
1,418  
1,912  
1,270  
1,087  
Total(a) (b)  
3,332  
(2)  
3,330  
2,357  
(
a) Including 2,669 million related to affiliates as of December 31, 2013.  
(b) Due in 12 months or less.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
359  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
6) Shareholders’ equity  
A) Common shares  
Share capital transactions are detailed as follows:  
Variation of the share capital  
2,349,640,931  
As of December 31, 2010  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
8,902,717  
5,223,665  
As of December 31, 2011  
2,363,767,313  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase as part of a global free share plan intended for the Group Employees  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
1,366,950  
798,883  
As of December 31, 2012  
2,365,933,146  
Shares issued in connection with: Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
Exercise of TOTAL share subscription options  
10,802,215  
942,799  
As of December 31, 2013(a)  
2,377,678,160  
(a) Including 109,214,448 treasury shares deducted from consolidated shareholders’ equity.  
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
affiliated with the Company, within a limit of 0.8% of the outstanding  
share capital of the Company as of the date of the decision of the  
Board of Directors to grant such shares. Pursuant to this delegation,  
the Board of Directors, during its May 21, 2010 meeting, determined  
the terms of a global free share plan intended for Group Employees  
and granted the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer all powers  
necessary to implement this plan.  
The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012, in its seventeenth  
resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the authority to carry  
out in one or more occasions within a maximum period of twenty-  
six months, a capital increase reserved for employees belonging to  
an employee savings plan.  
The Combined General Meeting of May 11, 2012, in its eighteenth  
resolution, also delegated to the Board of Directors the powers  
necessary to accomplish in one or more occasions within a  
maximum period of eighteen months, a capital increase with the  
objective of providing employees with their registered office located  
outside France with benefits comparable to those granted to the  
employees included in the seventeenth resolution of the Combined  
General Meeting of May 11, 2012.  
As a result, on July 2, 2012, the Chairman and Chief Executive  
Officer of the Group acknowledged the issuance and the final  
allocation of 1,366,950 ordinary shares with a nominal value of  
2.50 to beneficiaries designated by the terms defined by the  
Board of Directors meeting held on May 21, 2010.  
On December 31, 2013, 873,475 additional shares may be issued  
as part of this plan.  
Pursuant to these delegations, the Board of Directors, during its  
September 18, 2012, meeting, decided to proceed with a capital  
increase reserved for employees that included a classic offering and  
a leverage offering depending on the employees’ choice, within the  
limit of 18 million shares with dividend rights as of January 1, 2012.  
This capital increase resulted in the subscription of 10,802,215  
shares with a par value of 2.5 at a unit price of 30.70. The  
issuance of the shares was acknowledged on April 25, 2013.  
Share cancellation  
The Company did not proceed with a reduction of capital by  
cancellation of shares held by the Company during the fiscal years  
2011, 2012 and 2013.  
Treasury shares  
(TOTAL shares held by TOTAL S.A.)  
The prior capital increase reserved for employees of the Group was  
decided by the Board of Directors on October 28, 2010, under the  
terms of the authorization of the Combined General Meeting of May  
As of December 31, 2013, TOTAL S.A. holds 8,883,180 of its own  
shares, representing 0.37% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
8,764,020 shares allocated to TOTAL free share grant plans for  
Group Employees; and  
21, 2010, and resulted in the subscription of 8,902,717 shares with  
a par value of 2.5 at a unit price of 34.80. The issuance of the  
shares was acknowledged on April 28, 2011.  
– 119,160 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share  
purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
Capital increase as part of a global free share  
plan intended for Group Employees  
These shares are deducted from the consolidated shareholders’  
equity.  
The Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 16, 2008, in its  
As of December 31, 2012, TOTAL S.A. held 8,060,371 of its own  
shares, representing 0.34% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
seventeenth resolution, delegated to the Board of Directors the  
authority to grant, in one or more occasions within a maximum  
period of thirty-eight months, restricted shares to employees and  
executive officers of the Company or companies outside France  
– 7,994,470 shares allocated to TOTAL free share grant plans for  
Group Employees; and  
360  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
65,901 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share  
purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
TOTAL shares held by the Group subsidiaries  
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, TOTAL S.A. held  
indirectly through its subsidiaries 100,331,268 of its own shares,  
representing 4.22% of its share capital as of December 31, 2013,  
These shares were deducted from the consolidated  
shareholders’ equity.  
4
.24% of its share capital as of December 31, 2012 and 4.24% of  
As of December 31, 2011, TOTAL S.A. held 9,222,905 of its own  
shares, representing 0.39% of its share capital, detailed as follows:  
its share capital as of December 31, 2011 detailed as follows:  
2,023,672 shares held by a consolidated subsidiary,  
Total Nucléaire, 100% indirectly controlled by TOTAL S.A.; and  
6,712,528 shares allocated to TOTAL free share grant plans for  
Group Employees; and  
98,307,596 shares held by subsidiaries of Elf Aquitaine  
2,510,377 shares intended to be allocated to new TOTAL share  
purchase option plans or to new share grant plans.  
(Financière Valorgest, Sogapar and Fingestval), 100% indirectly  
controlled by TOTAL S.A.  
These shares were deducted from the consolidated  
shareholders’ equity.  
These shares are deducted from the consolidated  
shareholders’ equity.  
B) Reserves  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
Revaluation reserves  
Legal reserves  
Untaxed reserves  
Reserves  
16  
740  
2,808  
387  
24  
740  
2,808  
387  
48  
740  
2,808  
390  
Total  
3,951  
3,959  
3,986  
7) Contingency reserves  
As of December 31,  
2013  
(M)  
Gross amount  
at beginning  
of year  
Increases  
Decreases  
Gross  
amount  
at year-end  
Used  
Unused  
Provisions for financial risks  
5,128  
961  
(13)  
(1)  
6,075 (a)  
Provisions for operating risks (including note 8)  
and compensation expense  
Provisions for non-recurring items(c)  
382  
302  
146  
-
(118)  
(302)  
-
-
410(b)  
-
Total  
5,812  
1,107  
(433)  
(1)  
6,485  
(
a) Provisions for financial risks are mainly comprised of a guarantee granted to an Upstream financing subsidiary for 5,655 million.  
(b) Provisions for operating risks are primarily comprised of:  
248 million for retirement benefits, pension plans and special termination plans, 10 million for long-service awards; and  
146 million for restricted share grants. The calculation is based on the value of the shares bought to cover the plan and prorated over the vesting period, i.e., two years for the 2012  
plan and three years for the 2013 plan, at the end of which the grant of the shares to their beneficiary becomes definitive, provided the performance and continuous employment  
conditions are met (see Note 23).  
c) The provision of 302 million related to the investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) was fully released following an  
(
agreement, through payment of this same amount in 2013.  
8) Employee benefits obligations  
TOTAL S.A. participates in death-disability, pension, early retirement and severance pay plans. Expenses for defined contribution  
and multi-employer plans correspond to the contributions paid.  
Provisions as of December 31, are as follows:  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Pension benefits and other benefits  
Restructuring reserves  
248  
-
237  
-
Provisions as of December 31,  
248  
237  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
361  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
For defined benefit plans, commitments are determined using a prospective methodology called “projected unit credit method”.  
The commitment actuarial value depends on various parameters such as length of service, life expectancy, employee turnover rate and  
salary revaluation and discounting assumptions.  
The actuarial assumptions used as of December 31, are the following:  
2013  
2012  
Discount rate  
3.23%  
4.63%  
4.04%  
2.96%  
4.61%  
3.79%  
Average expected rate of salary increase  
Average expected rate of return on plan assets  
Average residual life expectancy of operations  
10-20 years 10-20 years  
TOTAL S.A. records a provision in its accounts for the net actuarial liability of the plan assets and the deferred gains and losses to be  
amortized when this sum represents a pension liability.  
Actuarial gains and losses resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated  
remaining length of service of employees involved.  
The reconciliation between the total commitment for pension plans not covered through insurance companies and the provision booked is  
as follows:  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Actuarial liability as of December 31,  
366  
394  
Deferred gains and losses to be amortized  
(118)  
(157)  
Provision for pension benefits and other benefits as of December 31,  
248  
237  
The Company’s commitment for pension plans covered through insurance companies amounts to:  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Actuarial liability as of December 31,  
Plan assets  
569  
(494)  
561  
(518)  
Net commitment as of December 31,  
75  
0
43  
0
Provision for pension benefits and other benefits as of December 31,  
9) Loans  
Due date as of December 31,  
M)  
2013  
Within  
one year  
1 to 5 years  
More than  
5 years  
2012  
(
Debenture loans  
% Bonds 1998(2013 (FRF 1,000 million)(a)  
Accrued interest  
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
127  
-
Total debenture loans  
-
-
-
-
127  
Other loans(b)  
Current accounts(c)  
27,616  
9,352  
428  
9,352  
26,282  
-
906  
-
26,205  
6,632  
Total  
36,968  
9,780  
26,282  
906  
32,964  
(
(
(
a) Through the use of issue swaps, this debenture loan becomes equivalent to a dollar floating rate debt. It was repaid in full in 2013.  
b) Including 27,612 million related to affiliates.  
c) Including 9,352 million related to affiliates.  
362  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
10) Liabilities  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Suppliers  
Other operating liabilities  
1,665(a)  
2,848  
1,310(b)  
2,614  
Total(c) (d)  
4,513  
3,924  
(
a) Excluding invoices not yet received (676 million), the outstanding liability amounts to 989 million, of which:  
-
-
-
791 million for invoices of foreign suppliers to foreign branches for which the payment schedule is as follows:  
423 million within 30 days and 368 million payable no later than 180 days;  
4 million non-Group for which the payment schedule is as follows:  
1 million paid on December 31, 2013 and 3 million payable no later than January 31, 2014;  
194 million to the Group for which the payment schedule is as follows: 4 million paid on December 31, 2013 and 190 million payable no later than January 31, 2014.  
(
b) Excluding invoices not yet received (602 million), the outstanding liability amounted to 708 million, of which:  
-
670 million for invoices of foreign suppliers to foreign branches for which the payment schedule was as follows:  
437 million within 30 days and 233 million payable no later than 180 days;  
-
-
36 million non-Group for which the payment schedule was as follows: 1 million paid on December 31, 2012 and 35 million payable no later than January 31, 2013;  
2 million paid for invoices outstanding to the Group on December 31, 2012.  
(
c) Including 807 million in 2013 and 263 million in 2012 related to affiliates.  
(d) Due in 12 months or less.  
11) Currency translation adjustments  
The application of the foreign currency translation method outlined in Note 1 resulted in a net currency translation adjustment of 273 million  
as of December 31, 2013, mainly due to dollar-denominated loans.  
12) Sales  
(M)  
France  
Rest of  
Europe  
North  
America  
Africa  
Middle East  
&
Rest of world  
Total  
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013  
352  
14,366  
139  
1,143  
749  
16,749  
Hydrocarbon and oil products  
Technical support fees  
-
14,173  
193  
-
-
123  
626  
14,296  
2,453  
352  
139  
1,143  
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012  
340  
14,172  
138  
971  
825  
16,446  
Hydrocarbon and oil products  
Technical support fees  
-
13,984  
188  
-
-
143  
682  
14,127  
2,319  
340  
138  
971  
13) Net operating expenses  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Purchase cost of goods sold  
Other purchases and external expenses  
Taxes  
(9,934)  
(1,658)  
(43)  
(9,690)  
(1,952)  
(40)  
Personnel expenses  
(1,367)  
(1,331)  
Total  
(13,002)  
(13,013)  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
363  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
14) Operating depreciation, amortization and allowances  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Depreciation, valuation allowance and amortization on  
-
-
-
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  
Employee benefits  
Current assets  
(107)  
(146)  
(2)  
(98)  
(140)  
-
Subtotal 1  
(255)  
(238)  
Reversals  
-
-
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  
Employee benefits  
-
-
118  
195  
Subtotal 2  
Total (1+2)  
118  
195  
(43)  
(137)  
15) Financial expenses and income  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Financial expenses(a)  
Interest expenses and other  
Depreciation on investments and loans to subsidiaries and affiliates  
(284)  
-
(461)  
-
Subtotal 1  
(284)  
(461)  
Financial income(b)  
Net gain on sales of marketable securities and interest on loans to subsidiaries and affiliates  
Interest on short-term deposits and other  
-
45  
1
26  
Subtotal 2  
Total (1+2)  
45  
27  
(239)  
(434)  
(
(
a) Including, related to affiliates:  
b) Including, related to affiliates:  
262  
45  
450  
27  
16) Dividends  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Upstream  
1,583  
7
11  
5,754  
116  
81  
24  
Marketing & Services  
Refining & Chemicals  
Corporate  
7,863  
Total  
7,355  
8,084  
17) Other financial income and expenses  
This net loss of 4 million is comprised entirely of foreign exchange losses.  
364  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
18) Non-recurring income  
Non-recurring income is a loss of 37 million. It is detailed as  
– grant payments amounting to 16 million;  
follows:  
reversal of reserve for 8 million following the revaluation of Total  
loss on disposal of investments in the amount of 29 million;  
Nigeria plc shares as part of its disposal.  
19) Basis of taxation  
TOTAL S.A. is subject to French corporation tax according to the  
ordinary rules of law, i.e., based on the principle of territoriality of tax  
stipulated in the French Tax Code (Article 209-I). It is also taxed  
outside France on income from its direct operations abroad.  
– Elf Aquitaine;  
– Total Treasury;  
– Total E&P France.  
The French tax rate consists of the standard corporation tax rate  
(33.33%), plus additional contributions in effect in 2013, which  
brings the overall income tax rate to 38%.  
Moreover, since January 1, 1992, TOTAL S.A. has elected the  
95%-owned French subsidiaries tax regime provided for by Articles  
2
23 A et seq. of the French Tax Code (Régime de l’intégration  
An additional corporation tax contribution of 3% payable on  
dividends distributed by French or foreign companies and  
organizations subject to corporation tax in France was created by  
the amending finance law for 2012. This new contribution is  
payable for dividends paid on or after August 17, 2012, the date on  
which the law came into force.  
fiscale). In accordance with the integration agreement signed  
between TOTAL S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries, the losses  
realized by these subsidiaries during the consolidation period are  
definitively acquired by the parent company.  
The tax Group consists of 171 95%-owned subsidiaries whose  
main contributors to consolidated taxable income at December 31,  
The impact of the additional contribution to corporation tax is an  
expense of 161 million.  
2013 are:  
TOTAL S.A.;  
For fiscal year 2013, TOTAL S.A. recorded a net tax expense of  
Total Holding Europe;  
Total Marketing & Services;  
Total Raffinage France;  
Total E&P Holding;  
3,504 million, which is broken down into net tax income of  
838 million received primarily from the subsidiaries under the tax  
consolidation scheme, a tax expense of 4,181 million paid by the  
foreign branches and the additional tax contribution of 161 million.  
TOTAL S.A. does not record deferred tax in its parent company financial statements; however, the main temporary differences are as follows:  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Pension benefits and other benefits  
Net currency translation adjustment  
Foreign exchange loss  
248  
(273)  
273  
47  
237  
112  
-
Other, net  
40  
TOTAL NET ASSETS  
295  
389  
20) Foreign exchange and counterparty risk  
The commercial foreign exchange positions are systematically  
covered by the purchase or sale of the corresponding currencies,  
mainly with cash transactions and sometimes on forward market.  
Regarding long-term assets in foreign currencies, the Company  
tries to reduce the corresponding exchange risk by associating  
them, as far as possible, with financing in the same currency.  
interest rate and foreign currency swaps). Day-to-day treasury  
management operates on the basis of the daily rates, for instance  
by using short-term interest rate swaps.  
An independent department monitors the status of the financial  
instruments, especially through marked-to-market valuations and  
sensitivity estimations. Counterparty risk is monitored on a regular  
basis against limits set by the Group’s senior management.  
In terms of interest rates, most of the long-term debt is brought  
back to a variable rate through the use of issue swaps (long-term  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
365  
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
21) Commitments  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Commitments given  
Guarantees on custom duties  
Bank guarantees(a)  
Guarantees given on other commitments(b)  
Guarantees related to confirmed lines of credit  
Short-term financing plan(c)  
Bond issue plan(c)  
921  
7,402  
9,926  
55  
17,202  
38,208  
1,021  
5,679  
9,441  
126  
17,739  
35,227  
Total commitments given  
73,714  
69,233  
Commitments received  
Guarantees related to confirmed lines of credit  
Guarantees on confirmed authorized bank overdrafts  
Other commitments received  
7,999  
8,556  
209  
8,973  
7,071  
998  
Total of commitments received  
16,764  
17,042  
(
(
a) The variation is due primarily to our operations in Australia.  
b) This item mainly includes the following commitments: shareholder agreements, financing guarantees, payment guarantees, and reservation of oil and gas transport and storage capacity  
guarantees.  
(
c) Guarantees of bond issues and short-term financing plans incurred by Total Capital, Total Capital International and Total Capital Canada Ltd. On the overall plan amount of  
55,410 million, 27,136 million were incurred as of December 31, 2013 compared with 26,112 million as of December 31, 2012.  
Portfolio of financial derivative instruments  
The off-balance sheet commitments related to financial derivative instruments are set forth below.  
As of December 31,  
(M)  
2013  
2012  
Issue swaps  
Notional value, accrued coupon interest(a)  
Market value, accrued coupon interest(b)  
-
-
127  
30  
Short-term swaps  
Lender at fixed rate(a)  
Market value, accrued coupon interest(b)  
-
-
947  
-
Forward contract of currencies  
Notional value(a)  
Market value(b)  
14  
(1)  
34  
(1)  
(
(
a) These amounts set the levels of notional commitment and are not indicative of a contingent gain or loss.  
b) This value was determined by estimating future cash flows on a borrowing-by-borrowing basis and discounting these future cash flows using the zero coupon interest rate curves at  
year-end and taking into account a spread that corresponds to the average risk classification of the Company.  
22) Average number of employees  
As of December 31,  
2013  
2012  
Managers  
Supervisors  
Technical and administrative staff  
5,267  
1,444  
482  
5,203  
1,420  
453  
Total  
7,193  
7,076  
366  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
23) Stock option, restricted share and free share plans  
A) TOTAL share subscription option plans  
Weighted  
average  
exercise  
2003 Plan 2004 Plan 2005 Plan 2006 Plan 2007 Plan 2008 Plan 2009 Plan 2010 Plan 2011 Plan  
Total  
price ()  
Date of the  
shareholders’ meeting  
Date of the award(a)  
Exercise price  
05/17/2001 05/14/2004 05/14/2004 05/14/2004 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/11/2007 05/21/2010 05/21/2010  
07/16/2003 07/20/2004 07/19/2005 07/18/2006 07/17/2007 10/09/2008 09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011  
until May 23, 2006 included ()(b) 33.30  
39.85  
39.30  
49.73  
49.04  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Exercise price  
since May 24, 2006 ()(b)  
32.84  
50.60  
60.10  
42.90  
39.90  
38.20  
33.00  
-
-
Expiry date  
07/16/2011 07/20/2012 07/19/2013 07/18/2014 07/17/2015 10/09/2016 09/15/2017 09/14/2018 09/14/2019  
Number of options(b)  
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2011  
5,734,444 12,338,847 6,178,856 5,640,886 5,866,445 4,349,158 4,371,890 4,787,300  
-
49,267,826  
43.80  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
(738,534)  
-
(28,208)  
-
(16,320)  
-
-
(17,380)  
-
-
(16,080)  
-
-
(13,260)  
(200)  
-
(14,090)  
-
-
(85,217)  
(2,040)  
1,518,840 1,518,840  
(1,000) (930,089)  
(9,400) (5,223,665)  
33.00  
34.86  
33.11  
Exercised  
(4,995,910)  
(216,115)  
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2012  
-
12,094,524 6,162,536 5,623,506 5,850,365 4,335,698 4,357,800 4,700,043 1,508,440 44,632,912  
44.87  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
-
-
(2,516)  
-
-
(1,980)  
-
-
(1,380)  
-
-
(3,600)  
(1,630)  
-
(2,700)  
-
(4,140)  
-
-
-
39.31  
39.28  
- (11,351,931)  
(3,400) (11,371,647)  
(798,883)  
Exercised  
-
(742,593)  
(20,200)  
(34,460)  
-
Existing options  
as of January 1, 2013  
-
-
6,160,020 5,621,526 5,848,985 4,330,468 4,334,900 4,661,443 1,505,040 32,462,382  
46.96  
Granted  
Canceled(c)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(6,159,390)  
(630)  
-
(900)  
-
-
(1,020)  
-
-
(360)  
-
(1,080)  
-
(720)  
-
-
-
-
49.04  
37.37  
(6,163,470)  
Exercised  
(110,910)  
(344,442)  
(122,871)  
(363,946) (942,799)  
Existing options  
as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
-
5,620,626 5,847,965 4,219,198 3,989,378 4,537,852 1,141,094 25,356,113  
46.82  
(
(
a) The grant date is the date of the Board meeting awarding the share subscription options, except for the grant of October 9, 2008, decided by the Board on September 9, 2008.  
b) In order to take into account the four-for-one stock split on May 18, 2006, the exercise prices of TOTAL subscription shares of the plans in force at that date were multiplied by 0.25  
and the number of options awarded, outstanding, canceled or exercised before May 23, 2006 included was multiplied by four. Moreover, following the spin-off of Arkema, the exercise  
prices of TOTAL subscription shares of these plans were multiplied by an adjustment factor equal to 0.986147 effective as of May 24, 2006.  
(
c) Out of the options canceled in 2011, 2012 and 2013, 738,534 options that were not exercised expired on July 16, 2011 due to the expiry of the 2003 Plan, 11,351,931 options that were  
not exercised expired on July 20, 2012 due to the expiry of the 2004 Plan and 6,158,662 options that were not exercised expired on July 19, 2013 due to the expiry of the 2005 Plan.  
Options are exercisable, subject to a continuous employment  
condition, after a two-year period from the date of the Board  
meeting awarding the options and expire eight years after this  
date.The underlying shares may not be transferred during four  
years from the date of grant. For the 2007 to 2011 Plans,  
the four-year transfer restriction period does not apply to employees  
of non-French subsidiaries as of the date of the grant, who may  
transfer the underlying shares after a two-year period from the date  
of grant.  
The performance condition states that the number of options finally  
granted is based on the average of the Return on Equity (ROE) of  
the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012.  
The acquisition rate:  
– is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
varies on straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and  
Since the 2011 plan, no new TOTAL share subscription option plan  
or TOTAL share purchase plan was decided.  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal  
to 18%.  
2011 Plan  
In addition, as part of the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, the number of share subscription options finally awarded to  
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer will be subject to two  
performance conditions:  
For the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided that, for each  
grantee other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the  
options will be definitively granted to their beneficiary provided that  
a performance condition is fulfilled.  
For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the  
performance condition states that the number of options finally  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
367  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
granted is based on the average ROE of the Group,as published  
by the Group according to its Consolidated Balance Sheet and  
Statement of Income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition  
rate is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to  
Group according to from its Consolidated Balance Sheet and  
Statement of Income for fiscal years 2011 and 2012. The  
acquisition rate is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than  
or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and  
100% if the average ROACE is more than 6% and less than  
15%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROACE is more than  
or equal to 15%.  
7%, varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is more than 7% and less than 18%, and is equal  
to 100% if the average ROE is more than or equal to 18%.  
For 50% of the share subscription options granted, the  
Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition  
rate was 100% for the 2011 plan. As a reminder, the acquisition  
rates were 100% for the 2009 and 2010 plans.  
performance condition states that the final number of options  
finally granted is based on the average of the Return on Average  
Capital Employed (ROACE) of the Group, as published by the  
B) TOTAL performance shares grants  
2009 Plan  
2010 Plan  
2011 Plan  
2012 Plan  
2013 Plan  
Total  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of the award  
Date of the final award (end of the vesting period)  
Transfer authorized as from  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/13/2011 05/13/2011 05/13/2011  
09/15/2009 09/14/2010 09/14/2011 07/26/2012 07/25/2013  
09/16/2011 09/15/2012 09/15/2013 07/27/2014 07/26/2016  
09/16/2013 09/15/2014 09/15/2015 07/27/2016 07/26/2018  
Number of performance shares  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011  
2,954,336 3,000,637  
-
-
-
5,954,973  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
3,649,770  
(19,579)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,649,770  
(56,543)  
(26,214)  
(2,928,122)  
(10,750)  
(1,836)  
- (2,929,958)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
-
2,988,051 3,630,191  
-
-
6,618,242  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
4,295,930  
-
-
4,295,930  
(50,673)  
832  
(32,650)  
(18,855)  
(5,530)  
-
-
(832) (2,955,401)  
- (2,961,763)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
-
-
-
3,605,806 4,295,930  
-
7,901,736  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,464,200 4,464,200  
(14,970)  
(3,590,836)  
(17,340)  
(180)  
(3,810)  
(36,120)  
- (3,591,016)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
-
4,278,410 4,460,390 8,738,800  
The performance shares, which are bought back by the Company  
on the market, are finally granted to their beneficiaries after a three-  
year vesting period for the 2013 plan and a two-year vesting period  
for previous plans, from the date of the grant. The final grant is  
subject to a continued employment condition and a performance  
condition. Moreover, the transfer of the performance shares finally  
granted will not be permitted until the end of a two-year holding  
period from the date of the final grant  
– is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other  
than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior  
executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before.  
In addition, as part of the 2013 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of  
performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
2013 Plan  
For the 2013 plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior  
executives (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer),  
the final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued  
employment condition and a performance condition. The  
performance condition states that the number of shares finally  
granted is based on the average ROE of the Group as published by  
the Group according to its Consolidated Balance Sheet and  
Statement of Income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The  
acquisition rate:  
– For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate is equal to zero  
if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies on a  
straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE  
is more than 8% and less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the  
average ROE is more than or equal to 16%.  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the final number of shares finally granted is based on the  
average ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
368  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
TOTAL S.A.  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements 12  
according to its Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of  
Income for fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015. The acquisition rate  
is equal to zero if the average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%,  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the average  
ROACE is more than 7% and less than 15%, and is equal to  
– is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 7%;  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 7% and less than 18%; and  
– is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal  
to 18%.  
100% if the average ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other  
than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the senior  
executives) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of this  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before .  
2
012 Plan  
For the 2012 plan, the Board of Directors decided that for executive  
officers (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the  
final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment  
condition and a performance condition. The performance condition  
states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the  
average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to  
its Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate:  
In addition, as part of the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of  
shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
will be subject to two performance conditions:  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-line  
basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than  
7% and less than 18%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE  
is more than or equal to 18%.  
is equal to zero if the average ROE is less than or equal to 8%;  
varies on a straight-line basis between 0% and 100% if the  
average ROE is greater than 8% and less than 16%; and  
is equal to 100% if the average ROE is greater than or equal  
to 16%.  
The Board of Directors also decided that, for each beneficiary (other  
than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive  
officers) of more than 100 shares, the shares in excess of that  
number will be finally granted subject to the performance condition  
mentioned before.  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROACE is less than or equal to 6%, varies on a straight-  
line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more  
than 6% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average  
ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.  
In addition, as part of the 2012 plan, the Board of Directors decided  
that, subject to a continuous employment condition, the number of  
performance shares finally granted to the Chairman and Chief  
Executive Officer will be subject to two performance conditions:  
For 50% of the shares granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROE is less than or equal to 8%, varies on a straight-line  
basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROE is more than  
Due to the application of the performance condition, the acquisition  
rate was 100% for the 2011 plan. As a reminder, the acquisition  
rates were 100% for the 2009 and 2010 plans.  
C) Global free TOTAL share plan  
8% and less than 16%, and is equal to 100% if the average ROE  
The Board of Directors approved at its meeting on May 21, 2010,  
the implementation and conditions of a global free share plan  
intended for the Group’s employees (employees of TOTAL S.A.  
or companies in which TOTAL S.A. holds directly or indirectly an  
interest of more than 50%). On June 30, 2010, entitlement rights  
to 25 free shares were granted to every employee.  
is more than or equal to 16%.  
For 50% of the share granted, the performance condition states  
that the number of shares finally granted is based on the average  
ROACE of the Group as published by the Group according to its  
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2012 and 2013. The acquisition rate is equal to zero if the  
average ROACE is less than or equal to 7%, varies on a straight-  
line basis between 0% and 100% if the average ROACE is more  
than 7% and less than 15%, and is equal to 100% if the average  
ROACE is more than or equal to 15%.  
The final grant is subject to a continued employment condition  
during the plan’s vesting period. Depending on the country in which  
the companies of the Group are located, the acquisition period is  
either two years followed by a conservation period of two-year (for  
the countries with a 2+2 structure), or four years without any  
conservation period (for the countries with a 4+0 structure).  
2
011 Plan  
Following the vesting period, the shares awarded will be new  
shares issued from an increase of capital of TOTAL S.A. by  
incorporation of paid-in surplus or retained earnings.  
For the 2011 plan, the Board of Directors decided that for senior  
executive (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), the  
final grant of all shares will be subject to a continued employment  
condition and a performance condition. The performance condition  
states that the number of shares finally granted is based on the  
average ROE of the Group, as published by the Group according to  
its Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Income for fiscal  
years 2011 and 2012. The acquisition rate:  
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer acknowledged on July 2,  
2012 the issuance and the award of 1,366,950 shares to the  
beneficiaries designated at the end of the two-year acquisition period.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
369  
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Notes to the Statutory Financial Statements  
2
010 Plan  
2010 Plan  
(4 + 0)  
Total  
(2 + 2)  
Date of the Shareholders’ Meeting  
Date of the award(a)  
Date of the final award  
Transfer authorized as from  
Number of free shares  
05/16/2008 05/16/2008  
06/30/2010 06/30/2010  
07/01/2012 07/01/2014  
07/01/2014 07/01/2014  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2011  
1,508,650  
1,070,575  
2,579,225  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
-
-
(83,800)  
(900)  
(29,175)  
(475)  
(54,625)  
(425)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2012  
1,479,000  
1,015,525  
2,494,525  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted(b)  
-
(111,725)  
(1,367,275)  
-
-
(40,275)  
(152,000)  
(350) (1,367,625)  
Outstanding as of January 1, 2013  
-
974,900  
974,900  
Notified  
Canceled  
Finally granted  
-
100  
(100)  
-
(101,150)  
(275)  
-
(101,050)  
(375)  
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013  
-
873,475  
873,475  
(
a) The June 30, 2010, grant was decided by the Board of Directors on May 21, 2010.  
(b) Final grant of 1,366,950 shares to the designated beneficiaries at the end of the acquisition period.  
24) Others  
Compensation for the administration  
and management bodies  
Pension benefits for the Group’s executive officers and some  
members of the Board of Directors, employees and former  
employees of the Group totaled 188.7 million as of December 31,  
The aggregate amount of direct and indirect compensation paid by  
the French and foreign affiliates of the Company to the executive  
officers of TOTAL (the members of the Management Committee  
and the Treasurer) and to members of the Board of Directors who  
are employees of the Group was 22.1 million in 2013  
2013 (compared with 181.3 million as of December 31, 2012).  
They include severance to be paid on retirement, supplementary  
pension schemes and death-disability plans.  
Legal proceedings  
(21.3 million in 2012).  
All legal proceedings involving TOTAL S.A. are included in Note  
The compensation paid to members of the Board of Directors for  
directors’ fees totaled 1.25 million in 2013 (1.10 million in 2012).  
32 – Other risks and commitments – to the Consolidated Financial  
Statements attached to the Registration Document.  
370  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Other financial information concerning the parent company 12  
5
. Other financial information  
concerning the parent company  
5.1. Subsidiaries and affiliates  
As of December 31, 2013  
M)  
% of share  
capital  
owned by  
the company  
Share  
capital sharehoders’  
equity  
Other  
Book value  
Loans &  
avances  
Sales  
Net  
income  
Dividends Commitments  
(
of investments  
paid  
&
contingencies  
gross  
net  
Subsidiaries  
Elf Aquitaine  
Omnium  
100.0  
100.0  
100.0  
2,166  
29  
27,125  
585  
45,787  
114  
45,787  
114  
-
-
-
-
308  
517  
6,793  
177  
49  
2,176  
-
-
-
Reinsurance CIE  
Total China  
Investment Ltd  
Total E&P Golfe  
Holdings Ltd  
Total E&P Holdings  
Total E&P Holdings  
Ichthys  
Total E&P Ichthys  
Total E&P Iraq  
Total Energie  
-
-
155  
83  
140  
140  
100.0  
65.8  
-
6
172  
9,236  
2,855  
1,118  
2,855  
1,118  
-
-
-
-
(1)  
3,326  
-
-
-
1,340  
100.0  
100.0  
100.0  
84  
298  
13  
(3)  
(3)  
(17)  
84  
298  
67  
84  
298  
67  
-
-
-
-
-
(2)  
(1)  
(5)  
-
-
-
-
-
-
258  
Développement  
Total Gaz & Power  
Actifs Industriels  
Total Gasandes S.A.  
Total Gestion USA  
Total Holdings Europe  
Total Marketing & Services  
Total Raffinage Chimie  
Total Raffinage France  
Total Refining  
100.0  
84  
(76)  
100  
9
-
12  
(4)  
-
-
100.0  
100.0  
100.0  
53.2  
99.6  
100.0  
95.2  
330  
2
3,969  
65  
324  
934  
414  
103  
44  
330  
150  
330  
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29  
5
-
8
18  
-
-
-
-
-
3,969  
4,446  
5,815  
13,171  
1,635  
3,969  
4,446  
5,815  
13,171  
1,635  
8,616  
3,612  
12,215  
(798)  
-
20,914  
-
1,838  
832  
104  
(293)  
2,105  
-
-
-
-
700  
-
200  
30,694  
Saudi Arabia S.A.S  
Other  
100.0  
-
80  
-
11  
-
80  
768  
80  
444  
-
-
(3)  
-
-
-
481 12,727 (a)  
1,708 62,888(b)  
Total  
-
-
-
80,927  
80,407  
13,171  
-
-
7,355  
63,788  
(
(
a) Including Total Finance for 8,729 million and Total Treasury for 3,271 million.  
b) Including 55,410 million concerning Total Capital, Total Capital International and Total Capital Canada Ltd. for bond issue and short-term financing plans.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
371  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
12  
Other financial information concerning the Parent company  
5.2. Five-year financial data  
Share capital at year-end  
(K)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2010  
2009  
Share capital  
Number of common shares outstanding(a)  
5,944,195  
5,914,833  
5,909,418  
5,874,102  
5,871,057  
2,377,678,160 2,365,933,146 2,363,767,313 2,349,640,931 2,348,422,884  
Number of future shares to issue:  
-
-
share subscription options(a)  
Elf Aquitaine options and shares  
covered by the exchange guarantee(a)  
global free share plan  
25,356,113  
32,462,382 44,632,912 49,267,826 45,828,769  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
873,475  
974,900  
2,494,525  
2,579,225  
Operation and income for the year  
(K)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2010  
2009  
Net commercial sales  
Employee profit sharing  
Net income  
Retained earnings before appropriation  
Income available for appropriation  
Dividends (including interim dividends)  
Retained earnings  
14,295,556  
61,000  
14,127,247 12,102,415  
8,347,108  
48,000  
5,840,088  
4,425,753  
6,246,165  
35,000  
55,000  
6,519,782  
9,314,000  
51,000  
9,766,284  
4,916,078  
6,031,467  
10,291,083  
16,322,550  
5,661,590  
10,660,960  
5,633,681  
4,114,277  
9,747,958  
5,354,404  
4,393,554  
15,833,782 14,682,362 10,265,841  
5,581,925  
10,251,857  
5,392,829  
9,289,533  
5,384,541  
4,881,300  
Earnings per share  
()  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2010  
2009  
Income after tax, before depreciation,  
amortization and provisions(a) (b)  
Income after tax and depreciation,  
amortization and provisions(a) (b)  
Net dividend per share(a)  
3.06  
3.44  
4.80  
2.90  
2.68  
2.66  
2.38  
2.88  
2.34  
4.33  
2.28  
2.60  
2.28  
2.52  
2.28  
Employees  
(K)  
2013  
2012  
2011  
2010  
2009  
Average number of employees during the year(c)  
Total payroll for the year  
Social security and other staff benefits  
7,193  
1,007,778  
374,378  
7,076  
954,487  
383,844  
7,001  
910,707  
331,248  
6,809  
815,269  
311,114  
6,595  
881,515  
312,973  
(
a) On May 18, 2006, the share par value was divided by four.  
(b) Earnings per share are calculated based on the fully-diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year, excluding treasury shares and shares held by subsidiaries.  
(
c) Including employees on end-of-career leave or taking early retirement (Dispensations from work: 74 people in 2009, 79 people in 2010, 89 people in 2011, 96 people in 2012 and  
9 people in 2013).  
8
5.3. Proposed allocation of 2013 income  
(Net dividend proposed: 2.38 per share)  
()  
Income for the year  
Retained earnings before appropriation  
6,031,467,364.58  
10,291,082,595.98  
Total available for allocation  
16,322,549,960.56  
2
013 dividends: 2.38 per share(a)  
5,661,589,824.52  
10,660,960,136.04  
Retained earnings  
Total allocated  
16,322,549,960.56  
(a) The total dividend amount would be 5,661,589,824.52 based on a maximum number of shares entitled to a dividend for fiscal year 2013, i.e., 2,378,819,254.  
372  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
 
TOTAL S.A.  
Other financial information concerning the Parent company 12  
5.4. Statement of changes in share capital for the past five years  
For the year ended  
K)  
Cash contributions  
Successive  
amounts  
of nominal  
capital  
Cumulative  
number  
of common  
shares of the  
Company  
(
Par value  
Issue/  
conversion  
premium  
2009  
Changes in capital  
Options covered by the exchange guarantee  
Exercise of share subscription options  
Capital decrease  
1,200  
2,337  
(62,000)  
17,179  
29,996  
(1,160,212)  
5,930,720 2,372,288,104  
5,933,057 2,373,222,884  
5,871,057 2,348,422,884  
2
010  
011  
Changes in capital  
Exercise of share subscription options  
Changes in capital  
3,045  
37,875  
5,874,102 2,349,640,931  
2
Exercise of share subscription options  
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
13,059  
22,257  
159,896  
287,558  
5,887,161 2,354,864,596  
5,909,418 2,363,767,313  
2
012  
013  
Changes in capital  
Exercise of share subscription options  
Capital increase reserved for Group Employees  
1,997  
3,418  
29,284  
-
5,911,415 2,364,566,196  
5,914,833 2,365,933,146  
2
Changes in capital  
Exercise of share subscription options  
Capital increase reserved for Group employees(a)  
2,357  
27,005  
32,879  
302,694  
5,917,190 2,366,875,945  
5,944,195 2,377,678,160  
(a) See Note 6.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
373  
 
374  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Glossary  
A
C
Acreage  
Areas in which mining rights are exercised.  
Capacity of treatment  
Annual crude oil treatment capacity of the atmospheric distillation  
units of a refinery.  
API degrees  
Scale established by the American Petroleum Institute (API) to  
measure oil density. A high API degree indicates light oil from which  
a high yield of gasoline can be refined.  
Carbon capture and storage (CCS)  
Technology designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the  
atmosphere during the combustion of fossil materials by capturing,  
compressing, transporting and injecting carbon dioxide (CO ) into  
deep geological formations for permanent storage. The use of  
2
Appraisal (delineation)  
Work performed after a discovery for the purpose of determining  
the boundaries or extent of an oil or gas field or assessing its  
reserves and production potential.  
oxygen instead of air in CO production is called oxy-combustion.  
2
Catalysts  
Substances that facilitate chemical reactions during the refining  
process used in conversion units (reformer, hydrocracker, catalytic  
cracker) and desulphurization units.  
Associated gas  
Gas released during oil production.  
Association/consortium/joint venture  
Principal catalysts are precious metals (platinum) or other metals  
such as nickel and cobalt. There are some catalysts that regenerate  
themselves and others that are consumable.  
Terms used to generally describe a project in which two or more  
entities participate. For the principles and methods of consolidation  
applicable to different types of joint arrangements according to  
IFRS, refer to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
Coal bed methane  
Natural gas present in coal beds.  
(Chapter 10, point 7, note 1).  
Cogeneration  
Simultaneous generation of electrical and thermal energies from  
a combustible source (gas, fuel oil or coal).  
B
Barrel  
Concentrating solar power plant  
Unit of measurement of volume of crude oil equal to 42 U.S. gallons  
or 158.9 liters. Quantities of liquid hydrocarbons in barrels are  
expressed at 60°F.  
The most advanced form of solar steam plant which concentrates  
sunlight using mirrors to heat a liquid and produce electricity.  
This technology consists mainly of tower power plants and  
cylindrical-parabolic plants.  
Barrel of Oil Equivalent (BOE)  
Conventional unit for measuring the energy released by a quantity  
of fuel by relating it to the energy released by the combustion of a  
barrel of oil.  
Concession contract  
Exploration and production contract under which a host country  
grants to an oil & gas company (or joint venture) the right to explore  
a geographic area and develop and produce potential reserves.  
The oil and gas company (or joint venture) undertakes the execution  
and financing, at its own risk, of all operations.  
Biochemical conversion  
Conversion of energy sources (usually biomass) through biological  
transformation (reactions in living organisms). Examples include  
fermentation (in the presence of enzymes).  
In return, it is entitled to the entire production.  
Condensate  
Biofuel  
Light hydrocarbon substances produced with natural gas that exist  
Liquid or gaseous fuel used for transport and produced from biomass.  
either in a gaseous phase or in solution – in the crude oil under  
Biomass  
the initial pressure and temperature conditions in the reservoir, and  
which are recovered in a liquid state in separators, on-site facilities  
or gas treatment units.  
Biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues of  
biological origin from agriculture (including plant and animal  
substances), forestry and related industries, including fisheries  
and aquaculture which, through chemical transformation, can  
become beneficial molecules (carbon molecules) for the production  
of fuels and specialty chemicals.  
Conversion  
Refining operation aimed at transforming heavy products (heavy  
fuel oil) into lighter or less viscous products (gasoline, jet fuels, etc.)  
Cost oil/gas  
Brent  
In a production sharing contract, portion of the oil and gas  
production made available to the contractor (contractor group)  
and contractually reserved for reimbursement of exploration,  
development, operation and site reclamation costs (“recoverable”  
costs).  
Quality of crude (38° API) produced in the North Sea, at the Brent  
fields.  
Buyback  
Risk services agreement (the investments and risks are undertaken  
by the contractor) combined with an offset mechanism that allows  
the contractor to receive a portion of the production equivalent  
to the monetary value, with interest, of its investments and a return  
on its investment.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
375  
Cracking  
Ex situ oil shale production technology  
Refining process that entails converting the molecules of large,  
complex, heavy hydrocarbons into simpler, lighter molecules using  
heat, pressure and, in some cases, a catalyst. A distinction is made  
between catalytic cracking and steam cracking, which uses heat  
instead of a catalyst. Cracking then produces ethylene and  
propylene, in particular.  
(Red Leaf: EcoShaleTM In-Capsule Technology)  
Ex-situ production technology is used for shallow oil shale  
formations. Shale is extracted using a mining method and then  
heated in large sealed capsules. Heating triggers a pyrolysis  
reaction that produces high-quality liquid hydrocarbons and gas.  
F
D
Farnesane  
Dated Brent  
Farnesane is obtained through the hydrogenation of farnesene,  
Dated Brent is a market term representing the minimum value of  
physical cargoes of Brent, Forties, Oseberg, or Ekofisk crude oil,  
loading between the 10th and the 25th day forward.  
Dated Brent prices are used, directly and indirectly, as a benchmark  
for a large proportion of the crude oil that is traded internationally.  
a saturated hydrocarbon (alkane) that can be added to diesel fuel.  
Farnesene  
A hydrocarbon molecule (iso-olefin containing 15 carbon atoms),  
farnesene is a molecule that is very similar to fossil hydrocarbons  
and can therefore be used to produce fuel or chemical compounds.  
The Amyris company has developed a process to produce it through  
the fermentation of sugar.  
Debottlenecking  
Change made to a facility to increase its production capacity.  
FEED studies (Front-End Engineering Design)  
Studies aimed at defining the project and preparing for its  
execution. In the TOTAL process, this covers the pre-project and  
basic engineering phases.  
Deep conversion unit (coker)  
Unit that produces light products (gas, gasoline, diesel) and coke  
through the cracking of distillation residues.  
Desulphurization unit  
Fossil energies  
Energies produced from oil, natural gas and coal.  
Unit in which sulphur and sulphur compounds are eliminated from  
mixtures of gaseous or liquid hydrocarbons.  
FPSO (Floating production, storage and offloading)  
Floating integrated offshore unit comprising the equipment used to  
produce, process and store hydrocarbons and offload them directly  
to an offshore oil tanker.  
Developed Reserves  
Reserves that are expected to be recovered from existing wells  
and installations or for which the cost of the required equipment  
is relatively minor. This applies to both proved reserves and proved  
plus probable reserves.  
Development  
H
Operations carried out to bring an oil or gas field on stream,  
including in particular construction of the necessary infrastructures  
for oil and gas production.  
Hydraulic fracturing  
Technique that involves fracturing rock to improve its permeability.  
Distillates  
Hydrocarbons  
Products obtained through the atmospheric distillation of crude oil  
or through vacuum distillation. Includes medium distillate such as  
aviation fuel, diesel fuel and heating oil.  
Molecules composed principally of carbon and hydrogen atoms.  
They can be solid such as asphalt, liquid such as crude oil or  
gaseous such as natural gas. They may also include compounds  
with sulphur, nitrogen, metals, etc.  
Hydrocracking  
Catalytic refining process that uses hydrogen to convert heavy oils  
E
into lighter fractions.  
Energy mix  
The various energy sources used to meet the demand for energy.  
Ethane  
I
A colorless, odorless combustible gas found in natural gas and  
petroleum gas.  
In situ oil shale production technology  
(
American Shale Oil, LLC (AMSO) Technology)  
Ethanol  
In an in situ process, oil shale is heated in place underground in  
order to trigger an in situ pyrolysis reaction. The very high-quality  
liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons produced through this reaction  
are then extracted from the reservoir by gas lift and/or pumping,  
which are traditional production techniques.  
Also commonly called ethyl alcohol or alcohol, ethanol is obtained  
through the fermentation of sugar (beetroot, sugarcane) or starch  
(
(
grains, etc.). Ethanol has numerous food, chemical and energy  
biofuel) applications.  
Ethylene/Propylene  
Petrochemical products derived from cracking and essential to  
the production of polyethylene and polypropylene, two plastics  
frequently used in packaging, the automotive industry, household  
appliances, healthcare and textiles.  
376  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
L
Operator  
Partner of an oil and gas joint venture in charge of carrying out  
the operations on a specific area on behalf of the joint venture.  
A refinery is also said to be operated by a specific partner when  
the operations are carried out by the partner on behalf of all the  
partners of the joint venture that owns the refinery.  
Lignocellulose  
Lignocellulose makes up the wall of plant cells. In the biofuel sector,  
this term is used to designate wood and straw, two resources that  
can be used for biofuel production. Lignocellulose can be gasified  
(
(
thermochemical conversion) or split into its basic components  
sugars from cellulose and lignin) in order to transform them through  
biochemical conversion.  
P
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)  
Natural gas, primarily methane, that has been liquefied by cooling  
Permit  
Area contractually granted to an oil and gas company (or a joint  
venture) by the host country for a defined period. The permit grants  
the oil and gas company (or joint venture) the exclusive right to  
carry out exploration work (“exploration” permit) or to exploit a field  
(“exploitation” permit).  
in order to transport it.  
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)  
Light hydrocarbons (comprised principally of butane and propane)  
that are gaseous under normal temperature and pressure  
conditions and that are kept in liquid state by increasing the  
pressure or reducing the temperature. LPG is included in NGL.  
Petcoke (or petroleum coke)  
Residual product remaining after the improvement of very heavy  
petroleum cuts. This solid black product consists mainly of carbon  
and can be used as fuel in a manner similar to steam coal.  
M
Polymers  
Mineral interests  
Molecule composed of monomers bonded together by covalent  
bonds, such as starch and proteins. They are generally organic  
(DNA), artificial or synthetic (such as polystyrene). Polyolefins  
represent the largest family of polymers.  
Rights to explore for and/or produce oil and gas in a specific area for  
a fixed period. Covers the concepts of “permit”, “license”, “title”,  
etc.  
MTO/OCP  
Production plateau  
MTO (Methanols to Olefins) involves the conversion of methanol  
into olefins. OCP (olefin cracking process) is then used to convert  
these olefins into plastics.  
Expected average stabilized level of production for a field following  
the production build-up.  
Production Sharing Contract (PSA, PSC)  
Exploration and production contract under which a host country or,  
more frequently, its national company, transfers to an oil & gas  
company (the contractor) or a joint venture (the contractor group)  
the right to explore a geographic area and develop and produce  
the reserves of the fields discovered. The contractor (or contractor  
group) undertakes the execution and financing, as its own risk, of  
all operations. In return, it is entitled to a portion of the production,  
called cost oil/gas, to recover its costs and investment. The remaining  
production, called profit oil/gas, is then shared between the  
contractor (contractor group), on the one hand, and the national  
company and/or host country, on the other hand.  
N
Naphta  
Heavy gasoline used as a base in petrochemicals.  
Natural gas  
Mixture of gaseous hydrocarbons, composed mainly of methane.  
Natural Gas Liquids (NGL)  
Natural gas liquids are a mixture of light hydrocarbons that exist  
in the gaseous phase at atmospheric pressure and are recovered  
as liquid in gas processing plants. NGL include very light hydrocarbons  
Project  
(ethane, propane and butane).  
As used in this report, “project” may encompass different meanings,  
such as properties, agreements, investments, developments, phases,  
activities or components, each of which may also informally be  
described as a “project”. Such use is for convenience only and is  
not intended as a precise description of the term “project” as it  
relates to any specific governmental law or regulation.  
O
Oil and gas exploration  
All operations carried out to reveal the existence of oil and gas fields.  
Proved and probable reserves (2P reserves)  
Sum of proved reserves and probable reserves. 2P reserves are the  
median quantities of oil and gas recoverable from fields that have  
already been drilled, covered by E&P contracts and for which technical  
studies have demonstrated economic development in a long-term  
price environment. They include projects developed by mining.  
Olefins  
Products (gas) obtained after cracking of petroleum streams. Olefins  
are ethylene, propylene and butadiene. These products are used in  
the production of large plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC,  
etc.), elastomers (polybutadiene, etc.) and large chemical intermediates.  
Operated production  
Total quantity of oil and gas produced on fields operated by  
Proved permit  
Permit for which there are proved reserves.  
an oil company.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
377  
Proved reserves (1P reserves)  
Silicon  
Estimated quantities of crude oil and natural gas that geological  
and engineering data show, with reasonable certainty (90%), to be  
recoverable in the coming years from known reservoirs and under  
existing contractual, economic and operating conditions:  
The most abundant element in the earth’s crust after oxygen.  
It does not exist in a free state but in the form of compounds  
such as silica, which has long been used as an essential element  
of glass. Polysilicon (or crystalline silicon), which is obtained by  
purifying silicon and consists of metal-like crystals, is used in  
the construction of photovoltaic solar panels.  
developed proved reserves are those that can be recovered from  
existing facilities and without significant additional investment;  
undeveloped proved reserves are those that are expected to be  
recovered with new investments (surface facilities, wells, etc.).  
Site abandonment  
Oil companies may have to incur expenses related to the  
abandonment of production sites at the end of exploitation  
of a deposit. This definitive shutdown of the production on a field  
or part of sites production capacity (a well, a group of wells, etc.)  
generally involves the dismantling of production, transport and  
storage facilities and the restoration of the sites.  
R
Refining  
The various processes used to produce petroleum products from  
crude oil (distillation, reforming, desulphurization, cracking, etc.).  
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD)  
Technique used in in situ production of bitumen from oil sands  
which entails injecting water vapor to increase the temperature of  
the bitumen and reduce its viscosity, making it easier to extract.  
Renewable energies  
An energy source whose inventories can be renewed or are  
inexhaustible, such as solar, wind, hydraulic, biomass and  
geothermal energy.  
Reserve life  
Ratio of reserves at the end of the year to the production sold  
T
during the past year.  
Thermochemical conversion  
Conversion of energy sources (gas, coal, biomass) through thermal  
transformation (chemical reactions from heat). Examples include  
gasification, combustion and photosynthesis (solar energy).  
Reserves  
Estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related  
substances expected to be economically producible, as of a given  
date, by application of development projects to known  
accumulations.  
Tower/cylindrical-parabolic collector power plant  
Type of solar steam plant consisting of a field of solar mirrors –  
heliostats – which concentrate sunlight toward a boiler located  
at the top of a tower. At a cylindrical-parabolic collector plant  
Reservoirs  
Porous, permeable underground rock formation that contains oil  
(a reference to its shape), the mirrors follow the sun automatically  
or natural gas.  
as it rises.  
Resources  
Sum of proved and probable reserves and contingent resources  
(
average quantities potentially recoverable from known  
U
accumulations) - Society of Petroleum Engineers – 03/07.  
Unconventional hydrocarbons  
Hydrocarbons, oil and gas that cannot be produced or extracted  
using conventional methods. These hydrocarbons generally include  
shale gas, coal bed methane, gas located in very low-permeable  
reservoirs, methane hydrates, extra heavy oil, bitumen and liquid  
or gaseous hydrocarbons generated during pyrolysis of oil shale.  
S
Seismic  
Method of exploring the subsoil that entails methodically sending  
vibration or sound waves and recording their reflections to assess  
the type, size, shape and depth of subsurface layers.  
Unitization  
Creation of a new joint venture and appointment of a single  
operator for the development and production as single unit  
of an oil or gas field involving several permits/licenses or countries.  
Shale gas  
Natural gas trapped in very compact, low-permeable rock.  
Sidetrack  
Unproved permit  
Well drilled from a portion of an existing well (and not by starting  
from the surface). It is used to get around an obstruction in the  
original well or resume drilling in a new direction or to explore a  
nearby geological area.  
Permit for which there are no proved reserves.  
Upgrader  
Refining unit where petroleum products, such as heavy oils,  
are upgraded through cracking and hydrogenation.  
378  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Cross reference lists  
Registration Document concordance tables, for use in identifying the information required  
by Annex 1 of Regulation 809/2004/EC of 29 April 2004  
Information required by Annex 1  
of Regulation 809/2004/EC  
Registration Document 2013  
Relevant chapters  
Relevant paragraphs  
1.  
2.  
3.  
4.  
5.  
Persons responsible  
Statutory auditors  
p i  
5
p i  
4.1. to 4.3.  
2.  
Selected financial information  
Risk factors  
1
4
1. to 5.  
Information about the issuer  
5
.1.  
History and development  
2
2
9
2
9
2
9
2
9
2
3
2
2
2
2
1.1.  
1.1.  
2.1.  
1.1.  
2.1.  
1.1.  
2.1.  
1.1.  
2.1.  
5.1.1. Legal and commercial name  
5
5
5
5
.1.2. Place of registration and registration number  
.1.3. Date of incorporation and length of life  
.1.4. Domicile, legal form, applicable legislation, country of incorporation  
address and telephone number of registered office  
.1.5. Important events in the development of the business  
2. to 5.  
1.  
5.1. and 5.2.  
5.1.  
5
5
5
5
.2.  
Investments  
.2.1. Principal investments over the last three fiscal years  
.2.2. Principal investments in progress  
.2.3. Principal future investments  
5.1.  
5.2.  
6. Business overview  
6
6
6
.1.  
Principal activities  
1
2
1
2
2
3
4
2
4
2.  
2. to 5.  
2.  
.2.  
.3.  
Principal markets  
2. to 5.  
2. to 5.  
1.1. to 1.5.  
3.3.  
1.1., 2., 3., 4.  
3.10.  
Exceptional factors that have influenced  
the principal activities or principal markets  
Dependence on certain contracts  
Competitive position  
6.4.  
.5.  
6
7.  
Organizational structure  
2
6.  
7
7
.1.  
.2.  
Issuer’s position within the Group  
Significant subsidiaries  
2
2
6.1.  
6.2.  
10  
7. (note 35)  
8.  
Property, plant and equipment  
8
.1.  
Most significant tangible fixed assets  
2
0
4
7
1. to 4., 7.  
7. (note 11)  
1
8.2.  
Environmental issues affecting the most significant  
tangible fixed assets  
2.  
2.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
379  
9.  
Operating and financial review  
9
.1.  
Financial condition  
1
3
3
3
3
3
2.  
1.1. to 1.6.  
1.1. to 1.6.  
9
9
9
9
.2.  
Operating results  
.2.1. Significant factors materially affecting income from operations  
.2.2. Narrative description of changes in net sales or revenues  
.2.3. External factors that have materially affected, or could materially affect. operations  
1.1. to 1.6. and 4.  
1.1. to 1.6.  
1.1. to 1.6. and 4.  
10.  
Capital resources  
1
1
0.1. Information concerning capital resources (both short and long term)  
0.2. Source, amounts and narrative description of cash flows  
3
3
0
3
4
2.1.  
2.2.  
5.  
2.3.  
1.  
1
1
1
1
0.3. Borrowing requirements and funding structure  
0.4. Restrictions on the use of capital resources that have  
materially affected, or could materially affect, operations  
n/a  
2
3
n/a  
5.2.  
2.5.  
0.5. Anticipated sources of funds needed for the principal future investments  
and major encumbrances on the most significant tangible fixed assets  
1
1
0
0
5.  
7. (note 11)  
1
1.  
2.  
Research and development, patents and licenses  
Trend information  
3
3.  
1
1
2.1. Most significant trends in production, sales and inventory,  
and costs and selling prices since the end of the last fiscal year  
2.2. Known trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are  
likely to have a material effect on prospects for the current fiscal year  
3
3
2
3
4
4.3.  
5.  
5.2.  
1
4. and 5.  
1. to 3.  
1
3.  
4.  
Profit forecasts or estimates  
n/a  
n/a  
1
Administrative, management and supervisory bodies and Senior Management  
14.1. Information about members of the administrative  
and management bodies  
5
5
5
1.1. and 3.  
1.9.  
14.2. Conflicts of interests, understandings relating to nominations,  
restrictions on the disposal of holdings in the issuer’s securities  
5.2.  
15.  
Remuneration and benefits  
1
5.1. Remuneration paid and benefits in kind  
granted by the issuer and its subsidiaries  
5.2. Amounts set aside or accrued to provide pension,  
retirement or similar benefits  
6
6
1 to 3 and 5.  
2.2., 4 and 5.  
1
10  
7. (notes 24 and 25)  
16.  
Board practices  
1
1
1
1
6.1. Date of expiration of the current term of office,  
and. date of commencement in office  
5
1.1.  
6.2. Contracts with the issuer or any of its subsidiaries providing  
for. benefits upon termination of such contracts  
6.3. Information about the issuer’s audit committee  
and remuneration committee  
6
5
5
5
2.2.  
1.5.1. and 1.5.2.  
1.6.1. and 1.6.2.  
1.3.  
6.4. Compliance with the corporate governance regime in force in France  
380  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
17.  
Employees  
1
7.1. Number of employees at the end of the last 3 fiscal years;  
breakdown by geographic location and category of activity  
7.2. Shareholdings and stock options  
1
7
1
5
6
5
6
2.  
1.  
2.  
5.1.  
4.  
5.1.  
4.  
1
17.3. Arrangements for involving employees  
in the capital of the issuer  
18.  
Major shareholders  
1
1
8.1. Interests held above the threshold for notification (known interests)  
8.2. Major shareholders’ voting rights in excess  
8
8
9
4.4.  
4.4.  
2.4.  
n/a  
of their share in the share capital  
1
1
8.3. Control of the issuer by one or more shareholders  
8.4. Arrangements, known to the issuer, the operation of which may  
at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the issuer  
n/a  
n/a  
n/a  
1
9.  
0.  
Related party transactions  
8
4.9.  
7. (note 24)  
10  
2
Financial information concerning the issuer’s assets and liabilities,  
financial position and profits and losses  
2
2
2
2
2
0.1. Historical financial information  
0.2. Pro forma financial information  
0.3. Consolidated annual financial statements  
0.4. Auditing of historical annual financial information  
0.4.1. Auditing of the historical financial information  
9
n/a  
10  
3.  
n/a  
2. to 7.  
9
3.3.  
1
1
0
2
5
1.  
2.  
2.  
20.4.2. Other information in the Registration Document  
that has been audited by the auditors  
12  
11  
11  
9
1.  
20.4.3. Financial data in the Registration Document that is not extracted  
from the issuer’s audited financial statements  
1.5. to 1.9.  
2.  
3.4.  
2
2
2
0.5. Age of latest audited financial information  
0.6. Interim and other financial information  
December 31, 2013  
0.6.1. Quarterly or half yearly financial information published  
since the date of the last audited financial statements  
0.6.2. Interim financial information covering the first six months  
of the fiscal year after the end of the last audited fiscal year  
0.7. Dividend policy  
n/a  
n/a  
2
n/a  
8
4
n/a  
2.  
4.  
2
2
2
0.8. Legal and arbitration proceedings  
0.9. Significant change in the issuer’s financial or commercial position  
3
5.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
381  
21.  
Additional information  
21.1. Share capital  
2
1.1.1. Issued capital and authorized capital  
9
2
0
n/a  
8
1.1. to 1.4.  
4. (note 6. A)  
7. (note 17)  
n/a  
3.2.2., 3.2.7.  
4.4.1., 4.5.  
1.5.  
1
1
21.1.2. Shares not representing capital  
21.1.3. Shares held by the issuer or its subsidiaries  
8
9
1
1
0
2
9
7. (note 17)  
4. (note 6)  
1.3. and 1.4.  
2
2
1.1.4. Securities granting future access to the issuer’s share capital  
1.1.5. Terms of any acquisition rights and/or obligations over  
capital issued but not paid, or any capital increase  
5
n/a  
9
5.1.3 and 5.1.4  
n/a  
2
2
1.1.6. Capital of any member of the Group which is under option  
1.1.7. History of the issuer’s share capital over the last 3 fiscal years  
1.6.  
1
1
0
2
7. (note 17)  
4. (note 6.A)  
2
2
2
1.2. Memorandum and Articles of Association  
1.2.1. Issuer’s objects and purposes  
1.2.2. Provisions of statutes and charters with respect to the members  
of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies  
9
5
9
9
9
9
8
9
5
2.2.  
1.4. and 1.5.  
2.3.  
2.4.  
2.5.  
21.2.3. Rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each class of. the existing shares  
21.2.4. Action necessary to change the rights of shareholders  
21.2.5. Manner in which annual general meetings of shareholders are called  
including the conditions of admission  
2.6.  
4.4.3. and 4.4.4.  
2.4.  
2
2
2
1.2.6. Provisions of the issuer’s statutes, charter or bylaws that would have the effect  
of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the issuer  
1.2.7. Provisions of the statutes governing the ownership threshold above  
which share ownership must be disclosed  
1.12  
9
n/a  
2.7.  
n/a  
1.2.8. Conditions governing changes in the capital that are more stringent than is required by law  
2
2.  
3.  
Material contracts  
other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business)  
(
n/a  
n/a  
2
Third party information and statement by experts  
and declarations of any interest  
n/a  
9
n/a  
4.  
2
4.  
5.  
Documents on display  
Information on holdings  
2
9
5.  
7. (note 35)  
5.1  
1
1
0
2
382  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Registration Document concordance table, for use in identifying the information contained  
in the Annual Financial Report  
The concordance table below is used to identify the information in this Registration Document contained in the Annual Financial Report  
pursuant to Article L. 451-1-2 of the French Financial and Monetary Code and Article 222-3 of the General Regulation of the French Financial  
Markets Authority.  
Annual Financial Report  
Registration Document 2013  
Relevant chapters Relevant paragraphs  
Annual Financial Statements  
12  
10  
3. to 4.  
2. to 7.  
Consolidated Financial Statements  
Management Report (pursuant to the French Financial and Monetary Code)  
Information mentioned in Articles L. 225-100 and L.225-100-2 of the French Commercial Code  
Analysis of profit and loss, changes in business, financial position and debt position  
2
3
4
1
7
3
4
9
2. to 4.  
1. to 2.  
4.1.  
1. and 2.  
1. to 3.  
Use of financial instruments by the Company  
Key financial and non-financial performance indicators  
Principal risks and uncertainties facing the Company and all of the entities  
taken as a whole included in the consolidation  
4.1. to 4.3. and 5  
1. to 5.  
Summary table of valid delegations with respect to capital increases  
Information mentioned in Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code:  
factors likely to have an impact in the event of a public offering  
Information mentioned in Article L. 225-211 of the French Commercial Code:  
buybacks of its own shares by the Company  
1.3.  
5
8
1.12.  
3.  
Declaration of persons responsible for the Annual Financial Report  
p i  
Reports of the statutory auditors on the parent company  
financial statements and consolidated financial statements  
10  
12  
1.  
2.  
Statutory auditors’ fees  
5
5
5
4.4.  
1.  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
(Article L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code)  
Auditors’ Report on the Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
Article L. 225-235 of the French Commercial Code)  
(
2.  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
383  
Registration Document concordance table, for use in identifying the information contained  
in the Management Report pursuant to the French Commercial Code  
Board of Directors’ Management Report pursuant  
to the French Commercial Code  
Registration Document 2013  
Relevant chapters Relevant paragraphs  
Position and activities of the Company and Group during the fiscal year  
Analysis of changes in the business, results and financial position  
of the Company and Group  
2
2. to 4.  
3
1
1. to 2.  
1. and 2.  
Key financial and non-financial performance indicators  
7
1. to 3.  
Foreseeable change in the position of the Company and Group, outlook  
Significant changes since the end of the fiscal year  
3
3
4.  
5.  
Research and development activities  
3
3.  
Significant acquisitions of shares in or takeovers of companies with registered offices in France  
Amount of dividends distributed in the last 3 fiscal years and amount of distributed income  
Injunctions or penalties for antitrust practices  
n/a  
8
4
n/a  
2.  
4.1.  
Information about payment terms of suppliers or customers of the Company  
Description of the principal risks and uncertainties faced  
by the Company and Group companies  
10  
3
4
7. (note 23)  
4.1. to 4.3.and 5  
1. to 5.  
Information about the use of financial instruments by the Company and Group  
Company’s exposure to price, credit, liquidity and cash flow risks  
Social and environmental consequences of activities;  
4
4
4.1.  
4.1.  
social commitments to promote sustainable development  
Polluting or high-risk activities  
7
4
7
1. to 4.  
2.  
2.  
(upper threshold in accordance with the Seveso II directive)  
Terms of office and duties performed in the Company as a whole  
by each of the directors during the last fiscal year  
Form of management of the Company  
Remuneration and other benefits granted to each of the directors  
Mandatory share holding period applicable to directors  
5
5
6
5
6
5
8
8
9
1.1.  
1.7.1. and 3.1.  
1. to 5.  
5.2  
4.2.1. and 4.2.2  
5.2.1.  
Summary of transactions in the Company’s stock carried out by the directors  
Information about share capital distribution  
TOTAL shares held by Group companies  
4.4.  
3.2. and 4.5.  
1.5.  
Information mentioned in Article L. 225-211 of the French Commercial Code  
relating to buybacks of its own shares by the Company  
Disposals of shares to adjust reciprocal shareholdings  
8
n/a  
5
3.  
n/a  
5.1.6.  
4.4.  
Statement of employee involvement in the share capital on the last day of the fiscal year  
8
Translation adjustments and adjustments to terms of issue or exercise of stock options  
or securities granting access to the share capital  
n/a  
n/a  
Changes made to the method of presentation of the annual financial statements  
10  
7., Introduction  
4.1.  
12  
Observations made by the French Financial Markets Authority  
on proposed appointments and renewals  
Table of results for each of the last five fiscal years  
Table and report on delegations with respect to capital increases  
Information mentioned in Article L. 225-100-3 of the French Commercial Code  
relating to factors likely to have an impact in the event of a public offering  
Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors  
n/a  
12  
9
n/a  
5.2.  
1.3.  
5
5
1.12.  
1.  
L. 225-37 of the French Commercial Code  
384  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
Registration Document 2013. TOTAL  
385  
386  
TOTAL. Registration Document 2013  
This brochure is printed on 100% recyclable and biodegradable coated paper,  
manufactured from ECF (Elemental Chlorine Free) bleached pulp in a European factory  
certified ISO 9001 (for its quality management), ISO 14001 (for its environmental management),  
CoC FSC (for the use of paper from sustainably managed forests) and is EMAS-accredited  
(for its environmental performance).  
Cover photography: © Thierry Gonzalez/TOTAL  
Design and Production: Agence Marc Praquin  
see you on  
www.total.com  
TOTAL S.A.  
Registered Office:  
2
9
, place Jean Millier - La Défense 6  
2400 Courbevoie - France  
Share capital: 5,944,195,400 euros  
42 051 180 RCS Nanterre  
www.total.com  
Switchboard: +33 (0)1 47 44 45 46  
Investor Relations: +33 (0)1 47 44 58 53  
North American Investor Relations: +1 (713) 483-5070  
5


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission