TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO
8-K, 1999-06-21
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: TRW INC, 8-K, 1999-06-21
Next: AMERICAN CENTURY MUTUAL FUNDS INC, N-30D, 1999-06-21




                           UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D. C.  20549

                             FORM 8-K

                          CURRENT REPORT


 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

    Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): June 9, 1999



  Commission Registrant; State of
  File 		 Incorporation;                    IRS Employer
  Number     Address; and Telephone Number     Identification Number
  -------    -----------------------------     ---------------------

  1-13739   UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION       86-0786732
            (An Arizona Corporation)
            220 West Sixth Street
            Tucson, AZ  85701
            (520) 571-4000

  1-5924    TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY      86-0062700
            (An Arizona Corporation)
            220 West Sixth Street
            Tucson, AZ  85701
            (520) 571-4000

 <PAGE>




Item 5.  Other Events
- ---------------------

  Settlement Agreement
  --------------------

    On  June  9, 1999, Tucson Electric Power (TEP) entered  into  a
Settlement  Agreement  (Settlement) with  certain  customer  groups
related to the implementation of retail electric competition.   The
Settlement  has been filed with the Arizona Corporation  Commission
(ACC), and TEP has requested the ACC to schedule the Settlement for
review   as  soon  as  practicable.   The  Settlement  will  become
effective  on  the  issuance of a final  ACC  order  approving  the
Settlement without modification.

  The  following are major provisions of the Settlement,  which  is
filed as an exhibit to this filing:

  -- Consumer  choice for energy supply will begin sixty  (60)  days
     after the ACC approves the Settlement and will be phased in as
     required  by the retail electric competition rules  previously
     described in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
     Condition and Results of Operation in the Quarterly Report on Form
     10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999.  By January 1,
     2001, consumer choice will be available to all customers.

  -- TEP rates will be frozen from July 1, 2000 through December 31,
     2008, providing TEP with the opportunity to recover its stranded
     costs, including regulatory assets.  The ACC will authorize  a
     Competition Transition Charge (CTC) with two parts - a "Fixed" CTC
     and a "Floating" CTC.

     -  The Fixed CTC will equal $0.93/kwh (average) and will include
        recovery of regulatory assets.  The Fixed CTC will terminate when
        $450 million has been recovered, but will in no case extend beyond
        December 31, 2008.  When the Fixed CTC terminates, unbundled
        service rates will be reduced by the same amount.

     - The Floating CTC recovers stranded costs that are not recovered
        through the Fixed CTC.  The Floating CTC is determined by the
        difference between the frozen rate and all other rate charges as
        listed below.  The Floating CTC will be calculated using a Market
        Generation Credit (MGC) approach which adjusts the floating CTC as
        the price of energy in the power markets fluctuates.  Because TEP's
        total retail rate is frozen, the Floating CTC recoups the revenue
        shortfall: when market prices are strong, stranded costs are lower
        and, thus, the Floating CTC is lower; and when market prices are
        weak, stranded costs are greater and the Floating CTC is higher.
        The Floating CTC will terminate on December 31, 2008.

  -- TEP's  rates will be unbundled into separate charges  for:   1)
     distribution;  2) transmission; 3) metering;  4)  billing;  5)
     ancillary  services; 6) fixed must-run generation;  7)  system
     benefits; and 8) standard offer generation.  The total of these
     charges will not be more than a customer's current bundled rates.
     All customers will be charged unbundled rates, including those
     customers who are not initially eligible for competition.  For
     TEP's standard offer customers, the CTC will be included in the
     cost of standard offer generation service.

  -- In accordance with the Rate Settlement Agreement approved by the
     ACC in 1998, TEP will decrease rates to retail customers by one
     percent (1%) on July 1, 1999 and one percent (1%) on July 1, 2000.
     These  reductions will apply to all tariffed retail customers.
     After these reductions, the Settlement provides that TEP's rates
     will be frozen until December 31, 2008, except for:

<PAGE>

     - changes that result due to this Settlement;
     - changes in TEP's transmission tariffs due to the implementation
       of the Arizona Independent System   Administrator (AISA);
     - changes resulting from the June 2004 review as described below.

  -- By  June  1,  2004 TEP will recommend to the ACC  any  required
     modifications to the CTCs and other service charges.   A  rate
     change, to take effect no later than January 1, 2005, will only be
     made if it results in a net reduction to overall charges.

  -- On or before December 31, 2002, TEP will transfer its generation
     and other competitive assets to a subsidiary of TEP, at market
     value.  At the time that TEP makes the transfer of such assets, it
     will  be required to provide generation for its standard offer
     customers according to the ACC's electric competition rules.

  -- On final approval of the Settlement by the ACC, TEP will move to
     dismiss all pending litigation brought by TEP against the ACC.

  When  the  final ACC order is approved, TEP will stop  accounting
for  its  generation operations using Financial Accounting Standard
No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation"
(FAS  71).  The  regulatory  assets  of  the  generation  business,
together with certain above-market generation plant costs, totaling
$450  million, will be recovered through the distribution business.
No  net  gain  or  loss to TEP or UniSource Energy results.   These
regulatory  assets will amortize to expense over the period  ending
in 2008, as provided for in the Settlement Agreement.

  In addition, if the Settlement is approved we will immediately
recognize as income the following Investment Tax Credit (ITC)
amounts:

  -- Deferred ITC:  On our financial statements we have deferred the
     benefit relating to ITC claimed on tax returns.  This Deferred ITC
     was then amortized to income over the tax lives of the related
     property.  The balance remaining when the Settlement is approved
     will be recognized immediately.  At March 31, 1999, the Deferred
     ITC balance was $9.7 million.

  -- ITC Carryforward: This ITC is generated but not yet claimed on a
     tax return, and will be recognized immediately as income to the
     extent that we expect to use the ITC on future tax returns.  At
     March 31, 1999, the total ITC Carryforward was $23 million.  The
     amounts expected to be used on future returns have not presently
     been determined.

  Certain  other  generation expenses, such as lease expense,  will
amortize differently in the future, although total amounts of  such
expenses will remain the same over the life of the leases.

<PAGE>

  Overall,  earnings will increase in 1999, primarily as  a  result
of the recognition of the ITC described above, and earnings will be
reduced in the next few subsequent years, primarily as a result  of
the  changes  in  ceasing  to apply FAS 71  to  generation  related
assets.   However, TEP expects that such earnings reductions  could
be offset and its earnings power retained provided:

  - customer  growth  in TEP's service territory continues  at  its
    current pace, about 2% to 3% annually;

  - margins on wholesale sales grow as market prices increase  over
    time in the region; and

  - a portion of free cash flow is used to reduce TEP's debt.

  The  table  below illustrates the anticipated impact on  TEP  and
UniSource  Energy's income statements in 1999-2001 from ceasing  to
apply  FAS  71 to our generation operations.  The table shows  only
expense item changes.

  This  analysis reflects TEP's Settlement filed with  the  ACC  on
June  9, 1999, as originally filed, and assumes that the Settlement
is  approved  by  year end 1999.  The analysis involves  estimates;
actual  results  in  the  future may differ materially  from  those
expressed below.  TEP's analysis is expressed in good faith and  is
believed by management to have reasonable basis, including  without
limitation,  examination  of  historical  operating  trends,   data
contained  in  TEP's  records and other data available  from  third
parties.  There can be no assurance that the Settlement filed  with
the  ACC  will  be  accepted as filed or that key  assumptions  and
related events will be realized.

  For  additional information regarding the accounting implications
from ceasing to account for the generation operations in accordance
with  FAS  71, see Note 2, TEP's Regulatory Assets and Liabilities,
of  Notes to Financial Statements contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for 1998.

<PAGE>

            Summary of Anticipated Expense Item Changes

                                       1999   2000    2001
                                       ----   ----    ----
                                       - millions of dollars -
Operating Expenses -
  increases/(decreases)

  Fuel & Purchased Power (a)          $ (4)   $(14)   $(14)
  Impact of changes in generation
  asset accounting methodologies (b)   (10)    (50)    (46)

  Stranded Asset Amortization (c)        4      17      21
  Income Taxes (d)                      (1)     (4)     (6)
                                       --------------------
     Total Operating Expenses          (11)    (51)    (45)
                                       --------------------

Operating Income -
  increase/(decrease)                   11      51      45

  Other Income -
    Income Taxes: ITCs (e)              30      (4)     (5)

Interest Expense - increase/(decrease)
  Capital Lease "interest method"
    interest expense (f)                23       92     91
  Interest on Losses recorded at
    present value (g)                   (9)     (35)   (37)
                                        -------------------
     Total Interest Expense             14       57     54
                                        -------------------
      After-tax impact                $ 27     $(10)  $(14)
                                        ===================

(a)   This  item  may  decrease to reflect the reclassification  of
  certain expenses presently classified as fuel expense to other line
  items of expense.  After we stop applying FAS 71 to our generation
  operations, the lease costs for the coal handling facility  lease
  will be reflected as depreciation expense and interest expense in
  the income statement, rather than operating lease expense.  Also,
  the  fuel  contract termination fee is presently capitalized  and
  amortized  to  fuel  expense  in accordance  with  ACC  and  FERC
  directives.   Post-FAS 71, the amortization of this  fee  may  be
  included  with  the amortization of other regulatory  assets  for
  financial statement presentation purposes.

(b)   This item reflects changes in accounting for leased and owned
  generating assets after we stop applying FAS 71 to our generation
  operations.  These changes include:

  - recognizing depreciation expense rather than lease expense for
    capital lease assets;
  - eliminating the amortization of the Springerville Unit 1
    Allowance contra asset which is offset against the Stranded Assets;
    and
  - reducing amortization and depreciation expense due to the write-
    down of generation plant assets.

(c)   This  is  a  new  amortization expense  item  resulting  from
  reclassifying  all  generation-related  regulatory  assets  to  a
  stranded cost regulatory asset totaling a net $414 million.   The
  $450 million of stranded costs includes $414 million presently on
  the balance sheet and $36 million which has already been expensed
  for financial statement purposes.

<PAGE>

(d)   This  item  reflects the expected 40% composite  federal  and
  state tax benefit from all the other changes in expense noted  in
  the table.

(e)    TEP  expects  to  recognize all deferred  ITC  and  all  ITC
  carryforward  expected  to be used within  the  ITC  carryforward
  period,  when  TEP  stops  applying  FAS  71  to  its  generation
  operations.  The 1999 amount in the table represents  TEP's  best
  estimate  of  the  amount recognizable and may change  materially
  before  the  settlement is approved.  For years after  1999,  the
  reduction in ITC reflects the elimination of amortization of ITC.

(f)    Interest  expense  on  the  balance  of  the  capital  lease
  liabilities will be recognized as a component of interest expense
  on  the  income statement after TEP stops applying FAS 71 to  its
  generation operations.

(g)   This  item  is  imputed interest expense and relates  to  the
  Springerville Unit 1 Allowance.  The imputed interest expense  is
  eliminated since the Springerville Unit 1 Allowance is reclassified
  to offset Stranded Assets.



  Supreme Court Decision
  ----------------------

  In  a separate issue, on June 9 the Arizona Supreme Court removed
Commissioner  Tony West from the ACC.  Mr. West held a  Commission-
issued  securities license when elected November 3, 1998.   Arizona
state  law  prohibits the election of a person to the  ACC  who  is
subject  to  regulation by the Commission.   The  Court's  decision
returns  former Commissioner Renz Jennings to the Commission  until
the  Governor  appoints  a  successor to serve  until  the  general
election in 2000.  The Court also stated that no rulings where  Mr.
West cast the deciding vote would be disturbed.



 Item 7.  Financial Statements and Exhibits
 ------------------------------------------
    Exhibit 10      Settlement Agreement


<PAGE>

                             SIGNATURE
                             ---------


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The
signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate
only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiary.



                                   UniSource Energy Corporation
                                           (Registrant)


Date:  June 18, 1999                 /s/ Karen G. Kissinger
                                     ---------------------------
                                     Karen G. Kissinger
                                     Principal Accounting Officer



                                     Tucson Electric Power
                                         (Registrant)



Date:  June 18, 1999                 /s/ Karen G. Kissinger
                                     ---------------------------
                                     Karen G. Kissinger
                                     Principal Accounting Officer






                    SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT


   This  Settlement Agreement is entered into this  9th  day

of June, 1999 by Tucson Electric Power Company ('TEP' or the

'Company'), the Arizona Residential Utility Consumer  Office

('RUCO'),  members of the Arizonans For Electric Choice  And

Competition   ('AECC')1   and   Arizona   Community   Action

Association ('ACAA') (collectively the 'Parties').

                         BACKGROUND

   A.  TEP is a public service corporation that, along  with

its  predecessors, has provided electric service in  Arizona

since  1892.  TEP currently provides retail electric service

to  the  City  of Tucson and in the surrounding Pima  County

area,  and  to Fort Huachuca in Cochise County  pursuant  to

Certificates  of Convenience and Necessity ('CC&Ns');  these

areas  shall  collectively be referred to as the  'TEP  CC&N

Service  Territory') that it has received from  the  Arizona

Corporation Commission ('Commission').

   B.  On  December 26, 1996, the Commission issued an Order

approving   A.A.C.  R14-2-1601,  et  seq.   (the   'Electric

Competition   Rules')   for  the  purpose   of   introducing

competitive access to retail electric generation and certain

other   services   that  are  deemed   to   be   competitive

(hereinafter  referred to as 'Competitive  Retail  Access').

Since  then,  the Electric Competition Rules have  been  the

subject   of  multiple  litigation  and  the implementation

1 AECC consists of the following organizations: Arizonans
for Electric Choice and Competition is a coalition of energy
consumers in support of competition and includes Cable
Systems International, BHP Copper, Motorola, Chemical Lime,
Intel, Honeywell, Allied Signal, Cyprus Climax Metals,
Asarco, Phelps Dodge, Homebuilders of Central Arizona,
Arizona Mining Industry Gets Our Support, Arizona Food
Marketing Alliance, Arizona Association of Industries,
Arizona Multihousing Association, Arizona Rock Products
Association, Arizona Restaurant Association, Arizona
Retailers Association, Boeing, Arizona School Board
Association, National Federation of Independent Business,
Arizona Hospital Association, Lockheed Martin, Abbot Labs,
and Raytheon.

<PAGE>

thereof  has  been  stayed while additional  amendments  and

revisions thereto are being considered.

   C.  TEP  has worked with the Commission Staff  and  other

interested  parties  towards finalization  of  the  Electric

Competition  Rules  and  the implementation  of  Competitive

Retail Access in Arizona.

   D.  The  Parties acknowledge that in order to restructure

the   Arizona  retail  electric  industry  to  provide   for

Competitive   Retail  Access  and  customer   choice,   this

Settlement   Agreement   provides   TEP's   shareholders   a

reasonable  opportunity to recover their prudently  incurred

investments and costs, including stranded costs.

   E.  The  Parties  also  acknowledge  that  each  Affected

Utility  (as defined in the Electric Competition Rules)  has

unique  financial  and  other circumstances  such  that  the

Commission  should review the provisions of this  Settlement

Agreement  relating  to  TEP's recovery  of  stranded  costs

independently  from  the proposals  of  any  other  Affected

Utility.

   F.  The  Parties  believe that this Settlement  Agreement

provides  for  the  timely   implementation  of  Competitive

Retail Access in TEP's CC&N Service Territory and for  TEP's

shareholders  to  have a reasonable opportunity  to  recover

their prudently incurred investments and costs.  The Parties

further  believe  that competition in the electric  industry

will benefit all customers in providing greater efficiencies

and   lower   electric  power  costs.    Accordingly,   this

Settlement  Agreement is to be interpreted so  as  to  bring

about these consumer benefits as soon as possible.

   G.  The  Parties  further  believe  that  the  terms  and

conditions of this Settlement Agreement are just, reasonable

and in the public interest in that they, among other things,

<PAGE>

provide  for  Competitive  Retail Access  in  TEP's  Service

Territory,  establish rate reductions for all TEP customers,

set  a  mechanism  for  stranded cost recovery  and  resolve

contentious litigation.

   H.  The  Parties  desire  that the  Commission  issue  an

Order:  (a)  finding that the terms and conditions  of  this

Settlement Agreement are just and reasonable;

(b)  concluding  that this Settlement Agreement  is  in  the

public  interest;  (c) approving this Settlement  Agreement;

and  (d)  implementing  the terms and conditions  set  forth

herein (the 'Commission's Approval Order').

   NOW,  THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants

and  promises  contained  herein  and  for  other  good  and

valuable   consideration,  the  Parties  hereto  agrees   as

follows:

1. COMPETITIVE RETAIL ACCESS.

   1.1  Competitive  Retail Access  in  TEP's  CC&N  Service

Territory shall commence sixty (60) days after the  issuance

of  the  Commission's Approval Order ('Commencement  Date'),

and  subject  to:  (a) the provisions of effective  Electric

Competition Rules; and (b) the terms and conditions herein.2

   1.2  Upon the Commencement Date, TEP shall make available

for Competitive Retail Access the amount of system peak load

   set  forth in the currently proposed Electric Competition

Rules, plus an additional fifty-four (54) megawatts of  load

which  shall  be  made available to eligible non-residential

customers.    Unless  subject  to  judicial  or   regulatory

2  The Parties recognize that Y2K issues will be of critical
importance  during the fourth quarter of  1999.   Therefore,
the Parties respectfully request approval of this Settlement
Agreement  on  or before August 1, 1999 so that  Competitive
Retail Access may commence in TEP's service territory on  or
before October 1, 1999.

<PAGE>

restraint,  all  TEP customers will be eligible  to  receive

Competitive Retail Access on January 1, 2001.

   1.3  The Parties shall urge the Commission to approve the

Electric Competition Rules, at least on an emergency  basis,

so  that  meaningful Competitive Retail Access can begin  in

TEP's service territory subject to the provisions of Section

1.1 herein.

   1.4  Electric Service Agreements ('ESAs'), in  effect  as

of the Commencement Date, shall remain in effect, unless TEP

and  the  respective parties thereto agree to a modification

or  a  termination thereof.  In the event that  an  ESA,  in

effect as of the Commencement Date, terminates by its  terms

prior  to January 1, 2001, then the ESA customer shall  have

the  option  of choosing: (a) Competitive Retail Access;  or

(b)  an  extension of the ESA up to January 1, 2001  at  the

then-current  contract price (with any  applicable  seasonal

adjustment and continuing escalation that would have applied

had the ESA not terminated).

2. STRANDED COST RECOVERY.

   2.1  TEP  shall have a reasonable opportunity to  recover

its  stranded costs, including its regulatory  assets.   TEP

shall  be  authorized to recover its stranded costs  in  the

following manner:

        (a) The  Commission shall authorize TEP to  implement

a  competition transition charge ('CTC') in two  components:

(i) a 'Fixed' CTC; and (ii) a 'Floating' CTC.

        (b) The  Fixed  CTC shall be set so  as  to  equal  a

charge  of  0.93 cents/kWh (average) ('Fixed CTC amount  '),

which  shall  include recovery of TEP's  regulatory  assets.

The  Fixed CTC component shall terminate when it has yielded

a  stranded  cost  recovery of four  hundred  fifty  million

<PAGE>

dollars  ($450 million), or on December 31, 2008,  whichever

occurs  first.   When  the Fixed CTC  terminates,  unbundled

service  rates  will  be reduced by the  same  amount.   The

amortization schedule for the $450 million of Fixed  CTC  is

attached hereto as Exhibit A.  The parties acknowledge  that

the actual collection of the Fixed CTC will vary with actual

kWh sales.

        (c) The  Floating  CTC shall be  calculated  using  a

Market Generation Credit ('MGC') methodology (as defined  in

subsection 2.1(d) below) and will terminate on December  31,

2008.   The  Floating CTC shall be determined on a quarterly

basis.   TEP  shall  set the Floating CTC amount  forty-five

(45)  days  prior  to  each calendar quarter.   The  Parties

acknowledge that the Floating CTC amount may vary from month-

to-month, as the MGC varies.  The Floating CTC amount  shall

equal the difference between the customer's bundled rate and

the  sum  of: (i) the MGC; (ii) the 'Adder' (as  defined  in

subsection  2.1(e) below);  and (iii) the unbundled  charges

for: a) distribution; b)    transmission;   c)   metering;

d)    billing;    e) ancillary services; f) fixed must-run

generation; g)  system benefits;  and  h) the Fixed CTC.

In a given  quarter,  the Floating  CTC can have a negative

value, in which  case  the negative  value  will be credited

to the customers'  monthly bill.

        (d) The  monthly  MGC amount shall be  calculated  in

advance  and stated as both an on-peak value and an off-peak

value.  The monthly on-peak MGC component shall be equal  to

the Market Price multiplied by one plus the appropriate line

loss (including unaccounted for energy ('UFE')) amount.  The

Market  Price shall be equal to the Palo Verde NYMEX futures

price,  except when adjusted for the variable cost of  TEP's

must-run  generation.  The off-peak MGC component  shall  be

<PAGE>

determined  in  the  same manner as the  on-peak  component,

except that the Palo Verde futures price will be adjusted by

the  ratio  of  off-peak to on-peak hourly prices  from  the

California  Power  Exchange  of  the  same  month  from  the

preceding year.  The market price shall reflect the cost  of

serving a one hundred percent (100%)  load factor customer.

        (e) The  Parties acknowledge that the purpose of  the

Adder  is  to  estimate  the cost of supplying  power  to  a

specific customer or customer group and stratum relative  to

the   value  of  the  NYMEX  futures  prices  used  in   the

calculation  of  the market price for a one hundred  percent

(100%)  load  factor.  The Adder will be adjusted  for  each

customer  class  and stratum, shall average  3.5  mills  and

shall  be  subject to the same line loss adjustment outlined

in  subsection (d) herein.  However, the initial  Adder  for

any customer shall not be less than 2.5 mills.

        (f) The   Parties  acknowledge  that  the  Adder   is

intended  to estimate the difference between the  flat  load

costs associated with the PV index and actual customer  load

characteristics  plus an additional amount  for  costs  that

will  not  be readily quantifiable until the Arizona  market

more  fully develops.  After June 1, 2004, any Party to this

Settlement  Agreement may submit a request to the Commission

to  alter/amend the initial Adder based upon  actual  market

conditions.  Any such requests will be considered as part of

the rate modifications contemplated pursuant to Section 5.2.

        (g)The  Commission shall authorize TEP to securitize

any  portion of the CTC, provided that TEP shall  file  with

the  Commission a financing application that  provides  that

TEP  will share the benefits of such securitization with its

customers.

<PAGE>

        (h) The  CTC  for an ESA customer shall be calculated

using the customer's ESA price as of May 1, 1999 (subject to

any automatic escalation provisions contained in the ESA) as

the customer's bundled rate.

        (i) Self-generation   and   other    reductions    in

purchases  'off-the-grid' shall not be subject  to  the  CTC

(consistent with the Electric Competition Rules).

        (j) During  a  month in which must-run generation  is

provided  to  meet retail load, the Market  Price  component

used  in  calculating the on-peak MGC shall  be  a  weighted

average of the Palo Verde NYMEX futures price and the  must-

run  variable  cost  charges that are levied  on  scheduling

coordinators serving retail customers in the TEP  load  zone

during that month, consistent with AISA protocols.

3.   SEPARATION OF COMPETITIVE AND NON-COMPETITIVE SERVICES.

   3.1  On  or before December 31, 2002, TEP shall  transfer

its generation and other assets deemed to be competitive (as

defined  in  the Electric Competition Rules) to a subsidiary

of  TEP,  at  market  value.  Commission  approval  of  this

Settlement Agreement shall constitute any necessary approval

or  waiver under Title 40, Arizona Revised Statutes and  the

Commission's Affiliated Interest Rules (A.A.C. R14-2-801, et

seq.)  for the formations of the subsidiary and the transfer

of  the  assets.   At  such time that  TEP  effectuates  the

transfer  of its generation assets, it shall be required  to

procure  generation  for  its standard  offer  customers  in

accordance with the Electric Competition Rules.

4. UNBUNDLED RATES.

   4.1  TEP's  rates shall be fully unbundled into  separate

charges for:

(a)   distribution;  (b)  transmission;  (c)  metering;  (d)

billing;   (e)   ancillary  services;  (f)  fixed   must-run

generation;  (g)  system benefits; and  (h)  standard  offer

generation,  the sum of which shall not exceed a  customer's


<PAGE>

current  bundled rates.  For TEP's standard offer customers,

the  CTC  shall  be included in the cost of  standard  offer

generation  service, and shall be separately  identified  on

the customers' bills.

   4.2 TEP's cost for variable must-run generation shall  be

billed  directly  to scheduling coordinators  in  accordance

with  AISA protocols, and shall be included in the  standard

offer generation charge.

   4.3  TEP  shall  take reasonable steps  to  minimize  the

'collapsing' of tariffs that are on file with the Commission

as of the Commencement Date.

   4.4   TEP   shall  charge  rates  for  transmission   and

ancillary   services  based  upon  its  FERC   Open   Access

Transmission Tariff.

   4.5  TEP's  tariffs shall be unbundled for all customers,

including   those  who  are  not  initially   eligible   for

Competitive Retail Access.

   4.6  TEP  shall  defer for future recovery  its  cost  to

implement  Competitive Retail Access.  The Commission  shall

authorize  TEP  to  recover  its  reasonable  and  prudently

incurred Competitive Retail Access implementation costs as a

plant  cost and/or deferred debit subject to review  in  the

TEP June 1, 2004 filing (as discussed in section 5.2 below.)

5. RATE REDUCTIONS.

   5.1  TEP  shall reduce the rates charged to  all  non-ESA

customers  by two percent (2%) as follows: one percent  (1%)

on July 1, 1999 and one percent (1%) on

July  1, 2000.  Except for the non-ESA two percent (2%) rate

reductions,  TEP's rates shall be frozen until December  31,

2008, except for: (a) those adjustments that will result  as

a  consequence of this Settlement Agreement; (b) changes  in

TEP's  transmission tariffs due to AISA or Desert STAR;  and

(c) changes authorized hereinbelow.

<PAGE>

   5.2  TEP  shall  file a report with the Director  of  the

Utilities Division by June 1, 2004 identifying any  required

modifications   to   the  Fixed  or  Floating   CTC,   TEP's

distribution  tariffs and other unbundled  components  ('TEP

June  1,  2004  filing'),  that would  have  the  effect  of

reducing standard offer and/or overall unbundled rates while

providing  for  TEP's  recovery  of  costs  associated  with

provider  of  last resort service in standard  offer  rates.

This report shall include a recommendation as to whether the

Fixed  CTC  can be eliminated/reduced prior to December  31,

2008.   Any  changes in TEP's rates made  pursuant  to  this

section  5.2 shall be implemented no later than  January  1,

2005.

   5.3  TEP's  rate  reductions provided  for  herein  shall

constitute  full compliance with provisions of the  Electric

Competition   Rules   requiring  that   Affected   Utilities

implement rate reductions.

6. TARIFF FILINGS.

   6.1  The  Parties  agree that the Unbundled  Distribution

Tariffs,  attached  hereto  as  Exhibit  B,  are  just   and

reasonable.   The Commission's Approval Order shall  include

such  a  finding  and  approve TEP's Unbundled  Distribution

Tariffs.

7. CODE OF CONDUCT.

   7.1  All  transactions between TEP (the regulated Utility

Distribution   Company)  and  its  affiliates   engaged   in

Competitive  Retail Access shall be governed by  a  Code  of

Conduct.   Within  thirty (30) days of the  filing  of  this

Settlement Agreement, TEP shall file with the Commission  an

Interim  Code of Conduct.  TEP will voluntarily comply  with

this Interim Code of Conduct until the Commission approves a

final  Code  of  Conduct  for TEP  in  accordance  with  the

Electric  Competition  Rules.  TEP  shall  confer  with  the

Parties prior to filing its Interim Code of Conduct.

<PAGE>

8. CERTIFICATE OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY.

        8.1     TEP agrees to the amendment and modification

of  its  CC&N  in order to permit Competitive Retail  Access

consistent with the terms of this Settlement Agreement.  The

Commission's  Approval  Order shall  contain  the  necessary

findings   and  conclusions  and  constitute  the  necessary

Commission  Order  amending and  modifying  TEP's  CC&Ns  to

permit  competitive Retail Access consistent with the  terms

of this Settlement Agreement.

9. INDEPENDENT SCHEDULING ADMINISTRATOR/INDEPENDENT SYSTEM
   OPERATOR.

   9.1  TEP  shall  fully  support the  development  of  the

Arizona  Independent Scheduling Administrator  ('AISA')  and

Desert   STAR.   TEP  shall  modify  its  FERC  Open  Access

Transmission Tariff ('OATT') to be fully compatible with the

AISA/ISO  Bylaws and Protocols Manual.  The Parties  reserve

their  rights with respect to any AISA protocols,  including

the  right to challenge or seek modifications to, or waivers

from,  such  protocols.   TEP  shall  file  changes  to  its

existing  OATT consistent with this Section within ten  (10)

days  of  Commission  approval of this Settlement  Agreement

pursuant to Section 13.3.

10.RESOLUTION OF LITIGATION.

   10.1 Upon  issuance by the Commission of the  Commission's

Approval Order that is no longer subject to judicial review,

TEP  shall  move  to  dismiss  with  prejudice  all  pending

litigation brought by TEP against the Commission and  assist

the   Commission  in  any  remaining  litigation   regarding

implementation of the Electric Competition Rules.

<PAGE>

11.LOW-INCOME PROGRAMS.

   11.1To ensure that low-income customers and programs  are

not  negatively impacted by the introduction and  transition

to  Competitive Retail Access, TEP's System Benefits  Charge

as  set  forth in the tariffs filed herewith, shall  include

charges to maintain its existing low-income programs  (which

include weatherization, Life Fund, bill assistance and  rate

discounts) in an amount of at least current levels through

December 31, 2004 when all such programs will be reviewed as

part  of  TEP's  June  1,  2004 filing.   Additionally,  the

Parties agree to recommend to the Commission that TEP's  low

income  rate  discount program (with the  exception  of  the

medical discount which shall remain the same) be amended  as

follows:  (a)  to  replace the current percentage  discounts

with a flat eight dollar ($8.00) per month discount; (b) the

applicant  for  the program must receive the bill  in  their

name,  be a residential customer and meet one-hundred  fifty

percent (150%) of the federal poverty income guidelines; and

(c)  the  program would operate as follows: (i) the  program

would  have  an  application  which  is  self-declared/self-

addressed and available in English and in Spanish; (ii) once

TEP  receives  the application, it would be reviewed;  (iii)

once  the  customer has been determined to be eligible,  the

discount would become effective immediately;

(iv)  participants  who move within TEP's service  territory

would have their eligibility transferred with them; and  (v)

the  customers would be notified annually by TEP when it  is

time to reapply.

12.WAIVERS.

   12.1 The  Parties  agree  that  waivers  for  TEP  of  the

Affiliated  Interest  Rules,  Integrated  Resource  Planning

Rules, certain conditions in Decision No. 60480, and certain

<PAGE>

Commission  decisions  are in the  public's  interest.   The

Commission's Approval Order shall include and grant  to  TEP

waivers from the following:

        (a) A.A.C.  R14-2-701, et seq. - Integrated  Resource

Planning Rules.

        (b) A.A.C.  R14-2-801  et seq. - Affiliated  Interest

Rules   (to  the  extent  necessary  to  comply  with   this

Settlement Agreement and the Electric Competition Rules).

        (c) Decision   No.  60480,  Holding  Company   Order:

Condition Nos. 2, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27 and

28.

        (d) Decision No. 59594 - Mid-Year DSM and  Renewables

Report.

        (e) Decision   No.   57586  -  Director   Transaction

Report.

        (f) Decision   No.  58316  -  Investment   Subsidiary

Liquidation Report and Purchase Agreement Summary.

        (g) Decision No. 58497 - Avoided Cost Report.

        (h) Decision No. 57090 - Time of Use Letters.

        (i) Decision No. 56659 - Time of Use Report.

        (j) Decision  No.  56526 - Fuel & Performance  Filing

(upon transfer of generation assets).

        (k) Decision No. 57924 - Interruptible Report  Filing

(upon transfer of generation assets).

        (l) Statistical  Data  on  Generating  Units   Filing

(upon transfer of generation assets).

        (m) Generating  Unit  Outage  Report   Filing   (upon

transfer of generation assets).

<PAGE>

13.CONTINGENCIES TO THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.

   13.1 Neither  the  Parties nor the Commission  shall  take

any  action  that  would  diminish  the  recovery  of  TEP's

stranded costs or regulatory assets provided for herein.  In

entering into this Settlement Agreement, TEP has relied upon

the  Commission's irrevocable promise to permit recovery  of

TEP's  stranded  costs  and regulatory  assets  as  provided

herein.  Such irrevocable promise by the Commission shall be

evidenced  by  the  issuance  of the  Commission's  Approval

Order,  shall  survive  the  expiration  of  the  Settlement

Agreement and shall be specifically enforceable against this

and any future Commission.

   13.2 The  Parties acknowledge that TEP's ability to  offer

Competitive Retail Access is contingent upon conditions  and

circumstances, a number of which are not within  the  direct

control of the Parties.  Accordingly, the Parties agree that

it may become necessary to modify the terms of retail access

to  account  for  such factors, and they  further  agree  to

address  such matters in good faith and to cooperate  in  an

effort to propose joint resolutions for any such matters.

   13.3 This  Settlement Agreement shall not become effective

until  the  issuance of a final Commission  Order  approving

this  Settlement  Agreement,  without  modification,  on  or

before  August  1, 1999.  In the event that  the  Commission

fails   to   approve   this  Settlement  Agreement   without

modification according to its terms on or before  August  1,

1999,  any  Party to this Settlement Agreement may  withdraw

from  this Settlement Agreement and shall thereafter not  be

bound  by  its provisions; provided, however,  that  if  TEP

withdraws  from  this Settlement Agreement,  the  Settlement

Agreement shall be null and void and of no further force and

effect.   Parties  so withdrawing shall be  free  to  pursue

<PAGE>

their  respective positions without prejudice.  Approval  of

this  Settlement Agreement by the Commission shall make  the

Commission  a Party to this Settlement Agreement  and  fully

bound by its provisions.

   13.4 TEP  shall not be prevented from seeking a change  in

unbundled  or  Standard Offer rates prior  to  December  31,

2008,  in the event of (a) conditions or circumstances which

constitute an emergency, such as the inability to finance on

reasonable terms; or (b) material changes in TEP's  cost  of

service  for  Commission regulated services  resulting  from

federal,   tribal,   state   or   local   laws,   regulatory

requirements, judicial decisions, actions or orders.  Except

for  the changes otherwise specifically contemplated by this

Agreement,  unbundled and Standard Offer rates shall  remain

unchanged until at least December 31, 2008.

   13.5 Each  provision of this Settlement  Agreement  is  in

consideration  and support of all the other provisions,  and

expressly  conditioned  upon acceptance  by  the  Commission

without  change.  In the event that the Commission fails  to

adopt this Settlement Agreement according to its terms, this

Settlement  Agreement  shall be  deemed  withdrawn  and  the

parties  shall be free to pursue their respective  positions

in these proceedings without prejudice.

   13.6 This  Settlement  Agreement shall  not  preclude  TEP

from  requesting, or the Commission from approving,  changes

to  specific  rate  schedules or  terms  and  conditions  of

service,  or  the  approval  of  new  rates  or  terms   and

conditions of service, that do not significantly affect  the

overall  earnings  of the Company or materially  modify  the

tariffs  or  increase the rates approved in this  Settlement

Agreement.   Nothing contained in this Settlement  Agreement

shall  preclude  TEP from filing changes to its  tariffs  or

<PAGE>

terms  and  conditions of service which are not inconsistent

with its obligation under this Settlement Agreement.

14.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

   14.1 This  Settlement Agreement represents an  attempt  to

compromise and settle disputed claims in a manner consistent

with   the  public  interest.   Nothing  contained  in  this

Settlement  Agreement is an admission by any of the  Parties

that  any of the positions taken, or that might be taken  by

each  in a formal proceeding, is unreasonable.  In addition,

acceptance  of this Settlement Agreement by the  Parties  is

without  prejudice to any position taken  by  any  party  in

these proceedings.

   14.2 The   Parties  agree  that  they   shall   make   all

reasonable  and good faith efforts necessary to  (a)  obtain

final   approval  of  this  Settlement  Agreement   by   the

Commission;   and   (b)  ensure  full   implementation   and

enforcement  of all the terms and conditions  set  forth  in

this  Settlement  Agreement.  Neither the  Parties  nor  the

Commission shall take or propose any action which  would  be

inconsistent   with  the  provisions  of   this   Settlement

Agreement.    All   parties  shall  actively   defend   this

Settlement  Agreement in the event of any challenge  to  its

validity or implementation.

   14.3 To  the  extent that any provision of this Settlement

Agreement  is  inconsistent  with  any  existing  or  future

Commission order, rule or regulation or is inconsistent with

the Electric Competition Rules as now existing or as may  be

amended  in  the  future, the provisions of this  Settlement

Agreement  shall control and the approval of this Settlement

Agreement by the Commission shall be deemed to constitute  a

Commission-approved   variation   or   exemption   to    any

conflicting provision of the Electric Competition Rules.

<PAGE>

   14.4 The provisions of this Settlement Agreement shall  be

implemented and enforceable notwithstanding the pendency  of

a  legal  challenge  to the Commission's  approval  of  this

Settlement   Agreement,  unless  such   implementation   and

enforcement  is  stayed  or  enjoined  by  a  court   having

jurisdiction  over  this matter.   If  any  portion  of  the

Commission's  Approval  Order  or  any  provision  of   this

Settlement Agreement is declared by a court to be invalid or

unlawful in any respect, then (a) TEP shall have no  further

obligations or liabilities under this Settlement  Agreement,

including,  but not limited to, any obligation to  implement

any  future  rate reductions under Section 5.1 not  then  in

effect; and (b) the modifications to TEP's CC&Ns referred to

in  Section  8.1  shall be automatically revoked,  in  which

event  TEP shall use its best efforts to continue to provide

noncompetitive services (as defined in the proposed Electric

Competition  Rules) at then current rates  with  respect  to

customer contracts in effect for competitive generation (for

the remainder of their term) to the extent not prohibited by

law and subject to applicable regulatory requirements.

   14.5 The   terms   and  provisions  of   this   Settlement

Agreement  apply  solely  to and are  binding  only  in  the

context  of  the  purposes and results  of  this  Settlement

Agreement  and  none of the positions taken  herein  by  any

party  may be referred to, cited or relied upon by any other

Party  in any fashion as precedent or otherwise in any other

proceeding  before this Commission or any  other  regulatory

agency or before any court of law for any purpose except  in

furtherance  of the purposes and results of this  Settlement

Agreement.

   14.6 The  filing  of  this Settlement Agreement  with  the

Commission  shall  constitute  TEP's  compliance  with   the

requirements  of Decision No. 61677 that it  file  with  the

<PAGE>

Commission  a plan for stranded cost recovery and  unbundled

tariffs on or before June 14, 1999.

   14.7 The  Parties agree and recommend that the  Commission

schedule  public meetings and hearings for consideration  of

this  Settlement  Agreement.  The filing of this  Settlement

Agreement  with  the Commission shall be deemed  to  be  the

filing of a formal request for the expeditious issuance of a

procedural  schedule that establishes such  formal  hearings

and  public  meetings as may be necessary for the Commission

to   approve  the  Settlement  Agreement  and  that   afford

interested  parties adequate opportunity to comment  and  be

heard  on  the terms of this Settlement Agreement consistent

with applicable legal requirements.













(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

<PAGE>

15.  Proposed Order.

   15.1 Within  thirty  (30)  days  of  the  filing  of  this

Settlement  Agreement, TEP shall file with the Commission  a

Proposed  Form of Order approving this Settlement Agreement.

TEP  shall  confer  with the Parties  prior  to  filing  the

Proposed Form of Order.



DATED as of this _____ day of June, 1999.



ARIZONANS FOR ELECTRIC
CHOICE AND COMPETITION
a coalition of energy
consumers in support
of competition and
includes Cable Systems
International, BHP
Copper, Motorola,
Chemical Lime, Intel,
Honeywell, Allied
Signal, Cyprus Climax
Metals, Asarco, Phelps
Dodge, Homebuilders of
Central Arizona,
Arizona Mining
Industry Gets Our
Support, Arizona Food
Marketing Alliance,
Arizona Association of
Industries, Arizona
Multihousing
Association, Arizona
Rock Products
Association, Arizona
Restaurant
Association, Arizona
Retailers Association,
Boeing, Arizona School
Board Association,
National Federation of
Independent Business,
Arizona Hospital
Association, Lockheed
Martin, Abbot Labs,
and Raytheon.




By:  _________________________

Title:  ________________________

<PAGE>

ARIZONANS FOR ELECTRIC
CHOICE AND COMPETITION
a coalition of energy
consumers in support
of competition and
includes Cable Systems
International, BHP
Copper, Motorola,
Chemical Lime, Intel,
Honeywell, Allied
Signal, Cyprus Climax
Metals, Asarco, Phelps
Dodge, Homebuilders of
Central Arizona,
Arizona Mining
Industry Gets Our
Support, Arizona Food
Marketing Alliance,
Arizona Association of
Industries, Arizona
Multihousing
Association, Arizona
Rock Products
Association, Arizona
Restaurant
Association, Arizona
Retailers Association,
Boeing, Arizona School
Board Association,
National Federation of
Independent Business,
Arizona Hospital
Association, Lockheed
Martin, Abbot Labs,
and Raytheon.




By:  _________________________

Title:  ________________________


<PAGE>

DATED this ____ day of June, 1999.

RESIDENTIAL UTILITY CONSUMER
OFFICE


By:  __________________________

Title:  _________________________
_______________________________





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission