TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO
8-K, 1999-12-02
ELECTRIC SERVICES
Previous: TOKHEIM CORP, SC 13D/A, 1999-12-02
Next: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP /DE/, S-3, 1999-12-02








                           UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D. C.  20549

                             FORM 8-K

                          CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):
November 22, 1999



  Commission  Registrant; State of          IRS Employer
  File Number Incorporation;                Identification Number
              Address; and Telephone Number
  ----------- ----------------------------- ---------------------

  1-13739     UNISOURCE ENERGY CORPORATION     86-0786732
              (An Arizona Corporation)
              220 West Sixth Street
              Tucson, AZ  85701
              (520) 571-4000

  1-5924      TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY    86-0062700
              (An Arizona Corporation)
              220 West Sixth Street
              Tucson, AZ  85701
              (520) 571-4000




Item 5.  Other Events
- ---------------------

  Settlement Agreement Approved
  -----------------------------

    On  November 22, 1999, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC)
voted  to  approve the Settlement Agreement (Settlement)  that  was
entered  into  between  Tucson Electric  Power  Company  (TEP)  and
certain  customer groups relating to the TEP's stranded  costs  and
unbundled distribution tariffs, with some modifications.  The ACC's
approval became effective upon signing of the written order by  the
Commissioners on November 30, 1999.

  The major provisions of the Settlement, as approved, are:

- - Consumer choice for energy supply will begin in January 2000,  60
  days after the effective date of the order, and will be phased in
  as required by the ACC's retail competition rules.  Initially,
  377 megawatts  of load, representing over 20 percent of TEP's
  retail customers, will be eligible to choose competitive energy
  suppliers. By January  1,  2001, consumer choice will be
  available  to  all  customers.  Under the ACC's electric
  competition rules, TEP will be required to provide energy to any
  distribution customer who  does not choose another energy
  service provider.

- - In  accordance with the Rate Settlement Agreement approved by the
  ACC  in 1998, TEP decreased rates to retail customers by 1.1%  on
  July  1,  1998,  1%  on July 1, 1999 and will decrease  rates  an
  additional  1% on July 1, 2000.  These reductions  apply  to  all
  retail customers except for certain customers that have
  negotiated non-standard  rates.  The Settlement provides that,
  after  these reductions, TEP's retail rates will be frozen until
  December  31, 2008,  except under certain circumstances. TEP will
  recover  the costs  of transmission and distribution under
  regulated unbundled rates.

- - TEP   will  recover  its  stranded  costs, including  regulatory
  assets, through two Competition Transition Charge (CTC)
  components:

  - A  Fixed  CTC component will equal a fixed charge per
    kilowatt-hour. It will terminate when $450 million has been
    recovered, or on December 31, 2008, whichever occurs first.
    When the Fixed CTC terminates, TEP's unbundled service rates
    will decrease by the amount of the Fixed CTC.
  - A  Floating  CTC component will equal the amount of the frozen
    tariff rates less the sum of all unbundled charges including
    the amount  for an energy price component based on the Palo
    Verde Futures Index for electric energy. Because TEP's total
    retail rate will be frozen, the Floating CTC will enable TEP
    to recoup the balance of stranded costs not otherwise recovered
    through the Fixed CTC. The Floating CTC will terminate no later
    than December 31, 2008.


- -  By June 1,  2004, TEP will be required to file a  general  rate
   case including an updated cost-of-service study. Any rate change
   resulting from this rate case would be effective no sooner  than
   June 1, 2005 and would not result in a net rate increase.

- -  By December 31, 2002, TEP will transfer its generation and other
   competitive  assets to a subsidiary of TEP.  TEP, as  a  utility
   distribution company (UDC), will acquire energy in the wholesale
   market  for  its retail customer energy requirements  through  a
   competitive bidding process.  TEP's generation subsidiary will
   sell energy into the wholesale market.

- -  TEP will dismiss all pending litigation brought by TEP  against
   the ACC once the order is no longer subject to appeal.

  Approval  of the Settlement causes TEP to discontinue  regulatory
accounting for its generation operations using Financial Accounting
Standard  No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain  Types  of
Regulation"  (FAS 71).  As a result, approximately $23  million  of
extraordinary  net income will be recognized in the fourth  quarter
of  1999.   The  $23 million net amount consists of  the  following
after-tax items:

  - $32  million  in  income from recognizing all remaining  usable
     investment tax credit benefits offset by:
  - $2  million  of expense from a change in accounting related  to
     certain emission allowance transactions, plus
  - $7  million  expense  true-up from recording generation-related
     property-tax expense on an accrual basis rather than the
     regulatory basis.

  The  regulatory assets of the generation business, together  with
certain above-market generation plant costs, totaling $450 million,
have  been  reclassified as Stranded Cost assets.  No net  gain  or
loss  to TEP or UniSource Energy results from the establishment  of
these assets.  The Stranded Cost assets will be amortized over  the
period ending in 2008 on a modified mortgage basis.

  Certain  expenses will be recognized differently than  previously
scheduled.  The following table summarizes the key effects  of  the
change from regulatory accounting for the generation segment of TEP
under  FAS  71 to the application of Financial Accounting  Standard
No.    101,   "Regulated   Enterprises   -   Accounting   for   the
Discontinuation of Application of FAS 71" (FAS 101).





        Summary of Projected Expense Item Changes
        -----------------------------------------

                                        1999   2000
                                        ----   ----
                                - millions of dollars -

Operating Expenses - increases/(decreases)

  Fuel & Purchased Power (a)            $(4)  $(14)
  Impact of changes in generation
  asset accounting methodologies (b)    (10)   (50)
  Stranded Asset Amortization (c)         4     17
  Income Taxes (d)                       (2)    (4)
                                        -----------
     Total Operating Expenses           (12)   (51)
                                        -----------

Operating Income - increase/(decrease)   12     51

  Other Income - Income Taxes: ITCs (e)   0     (4)

Interest Expense - increase/(decrease)
  Capital Lease "interest method"
    interest expense (f)                 23     92
  Interest on Losses recorded at
    present value (g)                    (9)   (35)
                                        -----------
     Total Interest Expense              14     57
                                        -----------
Extraordinary Item - net of tax (h)      23      0
                                        -----------
      After-tax impact on Net Income    $21   $(10)
                                        -----------
                                        -----------

(a)   The lease costs for the coal handling facility lease will  be
  reflected  as  depreciation expense and interest expense  in  the
  income  statement, rather than fuel expense.  The  fuel  contract
  termination  fee amortization will be included in stranded  asset
  amortization expense rather than fuel expense.

(b)   Changes in accounting for leased and owned generating  assets
  include:

- - a portion of capital lease expense is included in depreciation
  expense;
- - the amortization of the Springerville Unit 1 Allowance contra
  asset, which has been reclassified as an offset to Stranded
  Assets is eliminated; and
- - amortization and depreciation expense is reduced due to the
  write-down of generation plant assets.

(c)  This expense results from the amortization of the reclassified
  generation-related regulatory assets to a stranded cost
  regulatory asset totaling a net $414 million. Stranded costs of
  $450 million includes  $414  million presently on the balance
  sheet  and  $36 million which has previously been expensed for
  financial statement purposes.

(d)   A  40%  composite federal and state tax benefit from all  the
  other changes in expense noted in the table is projected.

(e)   The reduction in ITC reflects the elimination of amortization
  of ITC, see (h) below.

(f)   Interest expense related to capital lease liabilities will be
  recognized  as  a  component of interest expense  on  the  income
  statement.

(g)  The imputed interest expense related to the Springerville Unit
  1  Allowance  is  eliminated because  the  Springerville  Unit  1
  Allowance has been reclassified to offset Stranded Assets.

(h)   TEP  has recorded extraordinary income as a result of ceasing
  to account for generation operations in accordance with FAS 71,
  as described earlier in this document.


   Overall, earnings will increase in 1999 from the recognition  of
the  extraordinary  item described above.  The  extraordinary  item
also  results  in  an  approximate $23 million  increase  in  TEP's
equity.   In the few years following 1999, earnings will be reduced
due to the changes in expense recognition as a result of ceasing to
apply  FAS  71 to generation related assets.  However, TEP  expects
that the changes in expense recognition may be offset, and earnings
provided by, the following factors:

- - customer  growth  in  TEP's  service  territory  is  expected  to
  continue at its current pace, about 2% to 3% annually;

- - margins  on  wholesale sales are expected to increase  as  market
  prices increase over time in the region; and

- - a  portion  of free cash flow may be used to reduce  TEP's  debt,
  thereby lowering interest expense.

   TEP's  cash  flows will be largely unaffected by the  accounting
changes resulting from ceasing to apply FAS 71 and adopting FAS 101
for generation operations.


  This analysis reflects TEP's Settlement as approved by the ACC on
November  22,  1999.   This  analysis  involves  estimates;  actual
results  in  the future may differ materially from those  expressed
above.   TEP's analysis is expressed in good faith and is  believed
by   management   to  have  reasonable  basis,  including   without
limitation,  examination  of  historical  operating  trends,   data
contained  in  TEP's  records and other data available  from  third
parties.  It is not intended to be a forecast of TEP's or UniSource
Energy's earnings.





                             SIGNATURE


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The
signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate
only to matters having reference to such company or its subsidiary.



                                    UniSource Energy Corporation
                                    ----------------------------
                                         (Registrant)


Date: December 2, 1999                     Ira R. Adler
                                     ----------------------------
                                           Ira R. Adler
                                     Executive Vice President and
                                      Principal Financial Officer



                                     Tucson Electric Power
                                     ---------------------
                                         (Registrant)



Date: December 2, 1999                     Ira R. Adler
                                      ---------------------------
                                           Ira R. Adler
                                     Executive Vice President and
                                      Principal Financial Officer





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission