<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[ X ] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1996.
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [No Fee Required]
For the transition period from _____________ to ____________
Commission File No. 0-27206
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
1595 SPRING HILL ROAD, SUITE 360
VIENNA, VA 22182
(703) 821-3000
Incorporated in the State of Washington IRS Employer Identification
Number 91-1273737
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange
Common Stock on which Registered
(no par value) NASDAQ Stock Exchange
Number of shares of Common Stock (no par value) outstanding as of
July 25, 1996: 11,069,237.
Aggregate market value of Common Stock (no par value) held by non-affiliates of
the registrant on July 25, 1996, based upon the closing price of the Common
Stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market of $9.75 was approximately $96,222,701
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO .
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [ X ].
<PAGE> 2
PART I
This document may contain "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including (without limitation) under "Products
and Services," "Dependence on a Single Customer," "Research and Development"
and "Backlog" of Item 1 and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- General" and "--Liquidity and Capital
Resources" of Item 7. Such statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties, including those discussed herein, that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those projected in such statements.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
BACKGROUND
SPACEHAB, Incorporated ("SPACEHAB" or the "Company") was incorporated
in 1984 to commercially develop, own, and operate space habitat modules that
are carried in the cargo bay of a Space Shuttle. Having flown five successful
missions on the Space Shuttle to date, and with six more missions currently
scheduled through 1998, SPACEHAB has become a leader among the companies that
support people who are living and working in space.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The U.S. space program encompasses four broad objectives: to advance
scientific research, to establish a permanent human presence in space, to
develop new technologies that contribute to U.S. economic growth and security,
and to foster improved international relations through peaceful cooperation in
space with Europe, Japan, Russia, and other nations. SPACEHAB segments its
market into three categories: (i) microgravity and life sciences space research
aboard the Space Shuttle, (ii) space support services such as space station
logistics and ground operations and payload processing, and (iii) space
infrastructure development.
Microgravity and Life Sciences Space Research
In orbit, the forces of inertia and gravity counterbalance each other,
thereby creating a condition of near weightlessness known as OmicrogravityO.
In a microgravity environment, materials and living matter behave in
fundamentally different ways than they do on Earth. This phenomenon has
stimulated worldwide interest from scientists and commercial researchers who
are seeking improved ways to manipulate and process materials and to study
biological processes that cannot otherwise be achieved in ground-based
laboratories.
The demand for access to a microgravity environment can be divided
into two broad categories: scientific research and commercial applications.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA") and other U.S. and
international government research organizations provide support for both basic
scientific research and its commercial applications to determine the
fundamental effects that gravity has on physical processes. For the 1996
Government fiscal year, NASA budgeted $540 million to conduct scientific
research and commercial microgravity applications aboard the Space Shuttle
(excluding the associated Space Shuttle launch costs for these experiments).
2
<PAGE> 3
Space Support Services
Space support services entail providing logistics and payload
processing support to NASA and Space Shuttle and International Space Station
("ISS") users. Permanently orbiting facilities such as the Russian Mir space
station and the planned ISS require a reliable source of logistics; the food,
clothing, equipment, and supplies that sustain the astronauts and enable them
to conduct research.
NASA's current plans call for the Space Shuttle to be launched at
least seven times per year for the foreseeable future. NASA has six more Space
Shuttle logistics missions to Mir scheduled during the next two years. As
currently planned, the ISS will require five Space Shuttle logistics missions
per year.
In order to support Space Shuttle and ISS operations, NASA requires
ground operations and payload support services before and after each mission.
Payload processing operations entail payload scheduling, mission planning,
safety/certification analysis, physical integration of the payload into its
carrier (such as SPACEHAB modules), the integration of the carriers into the
Space Shuttle's cargo bay, flight operations, technical data gathering and
synthesis, and launch and landing site activities. NASA currently spends
approximately $300 million per year on processing payloads for Space Shuttle
operations.
Space Infrastructure Development
The ISS is the largest engineering and scientific project ever
undertaken. NASA's budget for the development of the ISS has been capped by
the U.S. Congress at $2.1 billion per year and $17.5 billion for the entire
program. As ISS hardware is developed and budget limitations are being reached,
opportunities are arising for the commercial development of certain elements of
the ISS infrastructure such as the X-ray crystallography facility, a component
of the robot arm that will be used to assemble and manipulate elements of the
space station, and attached platforms for unpressurized research. Once
developed by industry, commercial infrastructure can be leased to NASA, the
international partners, and industry on a per use or long-term service
contract.
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
SPACEHAB modules are aluminum cylinders, measuring 10 feet in length
by 13.5 feet in diameter, that incorporate a patented design including a
truncated top and flat-end caps. These fully-instrumented modules provide
experiment resources such as power, data management, thermal control, and
vacuum venting. SPACEHAB single modules are employed primarily for research
missions. In 1996, the Company completed a development program and introduced
the SPACEHAB Double Module. This new module is optimized to carry logistics
and now is being used by NASA to carry vital supplies to the astronauts and
cosmonauts who reside on the Russian space station Mir. SPACEHAB invested
$13.4 million in the design, development, and production of the Double Module.
The Double Module was completed and placed into service near the end of fiscal
1996.
SPACEHAB's fundamental business strategy is based on carefully
anticipating customer requirements, investing capital to develop space-flight
assets, contracting with established aerospace companies for engineering and
asset production while retaining ownership of these assets, and then providing
innovative, low-cost solutions that meet customer requirements using
fixed-price service contracts. This strategy has been successful in obtaining
two contracts with NASA, the $184 million Commercial Middeck Augmentation
Module (the OCMAM ContractO) contract for five missions and the $52.2 million
Mir contract (the "Mir Contract") for four missions. NASA exercised three
options under the Mir Contract in fiscal 1996, subject to final price
negotiations.
The CMAM Contract, signed in November 1990, requires SPACEHAB to
furnish NASA with SPACEHAB module accommodations for experiments developed by
the Centers for the Commercial Development of Space (OCCDSO) on five Space
Shuttle missions. The fourth CMAM mission was completed successfully aboard
the Space Shuttle Endeavour in May 1996 in which the Company integrated and
flew 12 CCDS experiments sponsored by industry, NASA, and academia. The
remaining experiments that will complete the CMAM Contract are intended to be
part of the Company's next mission currently scheduled for September 1996.
3
<PAGE> 4
The basic Mir Contract, signed in July 1995, requires the Company to
provide SPACEHAB Single and Double Module missions for the provision of
logistics resupply to the Mir space station on four Space Shuttle missions.
The first of these four missions was completed successfully in March 1996. On
this mission aboard the Space Shuttle Atlantis, a SPACEHAB Single Module
carried more than 4,600 pounds of food, equipment, and supplies for the two
Russian cosmonauts and one U.S. astronaut who are in orbit aboard Mir.
Three more SPACEHAB missions to Mir are planned in fiscal 1997 under
the Mir Contract. The next mission to Mir, currently scheduled for September
1996, is intended to accommodate the last CMAM experiments and approximately
7,000 pounds of logistics resupply. This mission also will be the first
flight of the new SPACEHAB Double Module. This new module configuration is
optimized to accommodate logistics and will substantially increase the
Company's capability to deliver supplies to Mir.
In June 1996, NASA exercised all three options on the Mir Contract,
providing a firm backlog of logistics resupply missions into 1998. These
options currently call for two Double Module missions and one Single Module
mission.
In its continuing effort to anticipate the needs of customers,
SPACEHAB has initiated the design and development of another module
configuration: a Double Module optimized for research missions. This new
Double Module is designed to augment the Company's fleet of pressurized modules
to meet both the research and logistics carrying requirements of NASA, the ISS
partner agencies, and industry.
COMPANY STRATEGY
SPACEHAB's strategy to enhance its position in all three markets is
based on seven principles.
1. Focusing on Quality of Service. SPACEHAB had two successful
missions in fiscal 1996. All five of the Company's missions to-date have been
completed successfully.
2. Expanding Company-Owned Spaceflight Assets. The Company
successfully completed the SPACEHAB Double Module that is being used by NASA to
provide logistics for the Mir space station. Initial design and development of
another Double Module, that is designed to carry experiments and unpressurized
logistics carriers, has been initiated to expand the Company's fleet of assets.
3. Maintaining Position as Low-Cost Provider. The Company continues
to offer its services to NASA and other customers on a fixed price basis that
it believes to be the lowest in the industry.
4. Continuing Entrepreneurial Initiative. The Company continues to
develop and offer innovative business arrangements to meet NASA and other
customer requirements.
5. Leveraging Skills of International Partners. The Company expanded
its international partner base in 1996 by collaborating with Spar Aerospace
Ltd. of Canada to propose the commercial development and lease of an element of
the ISS infrastructure to the Canadian Space Agency.
6. Acquiring Complementary Businesses and Assets. The Company
continues to evaluate opportunities to acquire complementary businesses,
engineering facilities, and hardware to improve its ability to perform work
associated with the Space Shuttle and ISS.
7. Attracting and Recruiting Talented Personnel. The Company hired
several highly experienced executives in 1996 to expand business development
efforts in microgravity and life sciences research, the ISS program, and
Russian activities.
4
<PAGE> 5
DEPENDENCE ON A SINGLE CUSTOMER
All of the Company's fiscal 1996 revenue was generated from two NASA
contracts - the CMAM Contract and the Mir Contract. The Company expects that
revenue from NASA will continue to account for a large majority of the
Company's revenue for the next several years. However, no assurances can be
made that NASA will require the Company's module services in the future.
Therefore, the Company's failure to execute new contracts with NASA would have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of
operations.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The Company believes that the timely development of new products, and
continuous enhancements to existing hardware are essential to maintaining its
competitive position. In the past two fiscal years, the Company has spent an
aggregate of $1.7 million on research and development.
Most of the research and development funds were spent on the design,
development, and qualification of the new SPACEHAB Double Module that is
optimized to carry cargo. The first flight of the Double Module is currently
scheduled for September 1996. The Company also performed research and
development activities to enhance the basic capabilities of its module system
with new features such as a video system switch, a digital television downlink
capability, and an experiment data interface to save time for astronauts while
they are conducting experiments inside SPACEHAB modules.
In fiscal 1996, the Company initiated the development of a new module
communications system that will be independent of the Space Shuttle's existing
data downlink. Once implemented, researchers with experiments on a SPACEHAB
mission will be able to have 24-hour, real-time monitoring and control of their
experiment hardware from their laboratory anywhere in the world.
In fiscal 1997, the Company plans to focus research and development
efforts on the design of another SPACEHAB Double Module that will be designed
to carry experiments. This module will be designed to be used to satisfy the
Space Shuttle-based research requirements of NASA, the International Space
Station partners, and industry beginning in 1998. Approximately $10 million
has been budgeted for fiscal 1997 to bring the science Double Module to its
critical design review.
Additional research and development is planned in fiscal 1997 to
expand the Company's product and service line to meet market requirements for
low-cost unpressurized carriers for science and cargo. Approximately $1
million is planned for expenditures in fiscal 1997 to bring these carriers to
their preliminary design reviews.
COMPETITION
Currently, there are no other companies that compete directly with
SPACEHAB by providing pressurized module services that are carried aboard the
Space Shuttle. However, NASA has a government-owned and operated system,
Spacelab, that does provide services that are similar to those provided by
SPACEHAB modules.
In the past, the Company has been selected by NASA to perform research
and logistics missions primarily due to the greater flexibility, shorter
payload integration period, and lower cost of the SPACEHAB module system
compared to Spacelab. NASA, having decided to end the Spacelab program,
scheduled the last Spacelab mission for March 1998.
The Company's long-term strategy for growth is to provide research,
logistics, infrastructure, and payload processing services to NASA and others
during the International Space Station era. This strategy will require the
Company to compete with companies such as Lockheed-Martin, The Boeing Company,
and others who have existing NASA support contracts, greater financial
resources and manufacturing capabilities, and larger marketing, sales and
technical organizations than the Company. However, SPACEHAB's existing
strategic relationships with McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, Alenia Spazio S.p.A.,
Mitsubishi Corporation, and Daimler-Benz A. G., all of whom are shareholders of
the Company, may provide opportunities for teaming and partnerships that
management believes will enable the Company to compete for market share. In
addition to being shareholders of the Company, McDonnell Douglas
5
<PAGE> 6
Aerospace is the prime contractor for the Company to construct the SPACEHAB
modules and to perform the integration and operations of the modules into the
Space Shuttle and Alenia Spazio S.p.A., as a subcontractor to McDonnell
Douglas, provides the structural shell and adaptive hardware for the SPACEHAB
modules. On December 15, 1996, The Boeing Company announced its intention to
acquire McDonnell Douglas Corporation. At this date, it is not possible to
predict what changes, if any, may occur in the relationship between the Company
and McDonnell Douglas upon consummation of that merger. Mitsubishi
Corporation, in addition to being a shareholder of the Company, is the
Company's exclusive sales representative in Japan. Although the Company has no
current business with Daimler Benz, the Company has explored the idea of and is
pursuing future business opportunities with this shareholder.
BACKLOG
All of the Company's revenue is generated from two contracts with
NASA, which, similar to contracts with other agencies of the U.S. government,
contain provisions for which NASA may terminate the agreement "for
convenience." The Company's contracts with NASA are conditioned by their terms
upon NASA receiving an adequate annual appropriation of funds from the United
States Congress. Failure to receive funds from Congress or a withdrawal by
Congress of prior appropriations would permit NASA to terminate its contracts
with SPACEHAB "for convenience." For fiscal year 1996, both the U.S. Senate
and House of Representatives have authorized and approved an annual
appropriation of $14.3 billion for NASA and $1.8 billion for the International
Space Station.
It is anticipated that future revenue will be derived from contracts
with entities other than agencies of the U.S. government which will not be
subject to federal contract regulations such as termination "for convenience of
the government" or federal government funding restrictions.
The Company believes that its success in capturing new business is
directly linked to its ability to identify and rapidly capitalize on emerging
market opportunities. The Company intends to foster this entrepreneurial
initiative by proposing new commercial business arrangements for services in
the space industry in each of its target markets. Additionally, the Company
plans to selectively pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses,
engineering facilities, and hardware to improve its ability to perform work
associated with the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station. The
Company also plans to implement the SPACEHAB Incubator Program in order to
evaluate, sponsor and invest in a portfolio of commercially focused, promising
microgravity research and development activities. The Company believes that
the demand for microgravity space research conducted on SPACEHAB Modules will
increase both before and after the International Space Station becomes
operational. There is a substantial and growing worldwide backlog for
microgravity experiments, both within NASA laboratories and among the CCDS
which suggests that even after the International Space Station becomes
operational, demand for microgravity experimentation may continue to exceed
capacity.
As of June 30, 1996, the Company's contract backlog is estimated to
be $92.3 million, of which $36.0 million represents funded backlog and $4.3
million represents non-U.S government contracts. In addition, the Company is
awaiting notification, from NASA, on submitted unsolicited proposals for
follow-on science missions. Estimated dollar amounts do not include 3 Mir
option missions which have been awarded but for which the final price has not
been negotiated. NASA has issued a contract modification in the amount of $3.5
million to allow the Company to begin work on the 3 Mir option missions during
the period needed to complete price negotiations.
CERTAIN REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and
regulations designed to protect the environment and to regulate the discharge
of materials into the environment. The Company believes its policies,
practices and procedures are properly designed to prevent unreasonable risk of
environmental damage and the consequent financial liability to the Company.
Compliance with environmental laws and
6
<PAGE> 7
regulations has not had in the past, and, the Company believes, will not have
in the future, material effects on the capital expenditures, earnings, or
competitive position of the Company.
EMPLOYEES
As of June 30, 1996 the Company employed 25 employees, 8 of whom hold
advanced degrees and nearly all of whom have extensive experience in both the
space industry and/or governmental space agencies, with a special competence in
commercial space and human space flight. The Company believes that it is
competitive in hiring and retaining qualified personnel. None of the
Company's employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Underlying
all of SPACEHAB's efforts has been the dedication and skill of its personnel.
The Company believes that the dedication of its employees is critical to its
success and its relations with its employees are excellent.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Office Age
---- ------ ---
<S> <C> <C>
Dr. Shelly A. Harrison Chairman and Chief 54
Executive Officer
Chester M. Lee President 78
David A. Rossi Senior Vice President - 39
Business Development
Margaret E. Grayson Vice President of Finance 50
(CFO) and Treasurer
John M. Lounge Vice President - 50
Operations
M. Dale Steffey Vice President - 61
Engineering and
Integration
Nelda Wilbanks Secretary 53
</TABLE>
Except for Dr. Harrison, Ms. Grayson and Mr. Steffey, each of the
foregoing officers has been employed by the Company in various elected
executive capacities for more than five years. The executive officers of the
Company serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Ms. Grayson joined
the Company in 1994, having previously served as Chief Financial Officer of CD
Radio, Inc. a satellite-based mobile customized radio service, and Vice
President of Finance and Treasurer of Standard Technology, Inc., a systems
integrator and manufacturer. Dr. Harrison has served as a member of the
Company's Board of Directors since 1987 and as its Chairman since 1993. Dr.
Harrison assumed the position of Chief Executive Officer in April 1996.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's headquarters are located in an approximately 7,800
square-foot leased office space in Vienna, Virginia. Approximately 2,000
square-feet of additional, contiguous office space will become available to the
Company on or about January, 1997. The term of the present lease expires on
March 7, 2001. This facility houses SPACEHAB's 11 person executive management
team. The Company also leases approximately 4,500 square feet of office space
located near Johnson Space Center in Houston,
7
<PAGE> 8
Texas. The term of this lease expires on February 28, 1998. The Houston
office houses the Company's 10 person operations management team.
The Company's payload processing facility is contained in an
approximately 40,000 square-foot plant located near the Kennedy Space Center in
Cape Canaveral, Florida. The Company owns the building but leases the land
upon which it was constructed. The payload processing facility has a prime
work area of approximately 10,000 square-feet which is designed to accommodate
the SPACEHAB Single and Double Modules, and also contains 11 secure
experiment/payload integration and work areas from 300 square-feet to 1,000
square-feet each, two off-line modifications shops, a tool room, a stock room,
and a conference/training room. The term of the lease for the land expires on
August 6, 1998, and is renewable, at the option of the Company, for two
successive five-year periods. Upon expiration of the land lease, all
improvements on the property will revert at no cost to the lessor.
The Company believes that its current facilities and equipment are
generally well maintained and are in good condition and that its existing
facilities and equipment are adequate for its present and foreseeable needs.
ITEM 3. LITIGATION
The Company is not currently involved in any material legal
proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were voted upon during the final quarter of 1996.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock (the "Common Stock") trades on the NASDAQ
National Market System under the symbol "SPAB". The stock has been publicly
traded since December 22, 1995, the date of the closing of the Company's
initial public offering. The high and low stock prices for fiscal 1996 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
High Low
---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter $12 1/4 $12
Second Quarter $15 1/4 $11 3/4
Third Quarter $16 $ 8 3/4
</TABLE>
The Company has never paid cash dividends. It is the present policy
of the Company to retain earnings to finance the growth and development of its
business, and therefore, the Company does not anticipate paying cash dividends
on its common stock in the foreseeable future.
The Company has authorized 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock. At July
25, 1996, 11,069,237 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. The Company had
approximately 1,500 shareholders of record of its Common Stock on June 30,
1996.
8
<PAGE> 9
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below are derived from the
audited financial statements of SPACEHAB, Incorporated. This selected
financial information should be read in conjunction with the Financial
Statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this
report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine Months
Ended
Years Ended September 30, June 30,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
------------- -------------- ------------- ------------ ---------------
(in thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue(1) $ - $ 42,467 $ 43,800 $ 46,059 $ 56,397
Costs of revenue 6,140 23,204 24,227 23,349 20,985
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Gross profit (loss) (6,140) 19,263 19,573 22,710 35,412
Marketing, general and
administrative expenses 8,317 7,906 5,064 3,816 4,056
Research and development expenses 11,459 3,076 - 1,600 100
--------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss) (25,916) 8,281 14,509 17,294 31,256
Interest expense, net of
capitalized amounts 3,983 4,209 4,863 1,365 699
Net income (loss) (29,840) 4,117 8,638(2) 15,809 29,829
Net income (loss) per common share $ (6.20) $ 0.62 $ 1.30 $ 2.37 $ 3.21
Shares used in computing net income
(loss) per common share 4,811 6,650 6,660 6,671 9,303
Other Data:
Cash provided by operations $ 27,590 $ 22,246 $ 21,831 $ 26,838 $ 13,151
Capital expenditures 29,896 16,589 76 4,943 6,266
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Working capital (deficit) $(13,744) $(31,066) $(20,589) $ 7,192 $ 45,942
Total assets 100,727 118,083 95,261 86,701 129,709
Long-term debt, excluding current
portion 51,333 30,325 22,884 24,886 17,318
Stockholders' equity (deficit) (34,511) (29,894) (21,184) (1,715) 71,596
</TABLE>
- -----------------------------
(1) The Company recognizes revenue upon the completion of each flight. Prior to
the Company's first mission in June 1993, the Company was a development stage
company and accordingly had no revenue for the year ended September 30, 1992.
(2) Includes an extraordinary loss of $934, net of taxes, relating to the
write-off unamoritzed deferred debt issuance costs, in conjunction with a
refinancing and the retirement of debt on that date. The Company has not paid
any dividends on the Common Stock since its inception.
9
<PAGE> 10
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
GENERAL
SPACEHAB was incorporated in 1984 to commercially develop space habitat
modules to operate in the cargo bay of a Space Shuttle.
The Company currently operates under two contracts with NASA, the CMAM
Contract and the Mir Contract, with contract values of $184.1 million and $52.2
million, respectively. All of the Company's revenues for 1996 were generated
from these two contracts.
Revenue is comprised of payment for leasing lockers and/or volume within
the SPACEHAB Modules and for the integration and operations support services
provided to scientists and researchers responsible for the experiments and/or
logistics supplies for flight. To date, revenue from lockers leased to
customers other than NASA have included an amount for transportation charges
which is paid to NASA and included in the Company's costs of revenue. In the
future, the Company may incur such transportation charges associated with such
revenues.
The expenses associated with the operations of SPACEHAB are recorded
differently based on the type of expense. Costs of revenue include integration
and operations expenses associated with the performance of two types of
efforts: (i) sustaining engineering in support of all missions under a contract
and (ii) mission specific experiment support. Expenses associated with
sustaining engineering are expensed as incurred. Mission specific expenses are
recorded as an asset and expensed upon completion of each specific Space
Shuttle mission and when the related revenue is recognized. Other costs of
revenue include depreciation expense, which is allocated to each SPACEHAB
Module ratably over a ten-year useful life. Flight-related insurance covering
transportation of the SPACEHAB Modules from SPACEHAB's payload processing
facility to the Space Shuttle, in-flight insurance and third-party liability
insurance, to the extent incurred, are also included in costs of revenue and
are recorded at the time a mission is flown. In addition, through a
modification to the Mir Contract, the Company has entered into an agreement
with NASA, in which NASA has agreed to indemnify the Company for up to $8.0
million in damages to a SPACEHAB Module during a Mir mission. In exchange for
this coverage, the value of the Mir Contract has been reduced by $2.4 million.
Marketing, general and administrative, interest, and other expenses are
recognized when incurred.
Revenue is recognized upon the successful completion of each mission and
the return of SPACEHAB Modules carried aboard that Space Shuttle mission. The
CMAM Contract, awarded in 1990, is for five missions and the Mir Contract,
awarded in 1995, is for four missions plus three option missions. The three
Mir option missions have been awarded but have not yet been negotiated. The
policy to recognize revenue only after successful completion of each flight was
adopted prior to the Company's completion of the development of the SPACEHAB
Modules and before the Company had a history of demonstrated capability for
successful completion of the contracted missions. Revenue will continue to be
recognized for the existing CMAM and Mir Contracts, including options to these
contracts, at the completion of each of the remaining missions. For new
contract awards for which the capability to successfully complete the contract
can be demonstrated at contract inception, revenue recognition under the
percentage of completion method may be reported based on costs incurred over
the period of contract performance.
SPACEHAB's reported net income grew at a compound annual rate of 94%
beginning with the completion of the Company's first mission in 1993 through
completion of the fifth mission in the nine months ended June 30, 1996. This
growth rate is not expected to continue at this historical level as a result of
a variety of factors. First, the Company is continuing the research and
development of new products that will be offered to NASA and other customers,
including foreign governments and commercial users of the Space Shuttles and
the International Space Station. These significant anticipated expenditures in
research
10
<PAGE> 11
and development will be incurred over the next three years as SPACEHAB
completes the design phase of these new assets. Secondly, sustaining
engineering costs expensed as incurred under the CMAM Contract were higher in
preparation for the initial missions than those expenses being incurred for the
fourth and fifth missions. A similar pattern is being experienced under the Mir
Contract, although to a lesser extent. The overall improved cost experience has
put pressure on pricing to NASA for future missions carrying comparable
payloads for microgravity space research and logistics on the Space Shuttles,
which may impact future mission contract value.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In 1996 the Company elected to change its fiscal year end from September 30
to June 30. Financial information for 1996, therefore, reflects nine months of
operations. Due to the Company's rate of growth and its contract schedule,
information for fiscal 1996 has not been annualized.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 1996 as Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended September
30,1995
Revenue. Revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 1996 increased 22.4%
to $56.4 million, as compared with $46.1 million for fiscal year 1995. The
results of operations for this new fiscal period include revenue for two
missions completed during the quarter ended June 30, 1996. This revenue is
attributable to the Company's completion in April 1996 of the first mission
under the Mir Contract and the completion in June 1996 of the Company's fourth
CMAM mission. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995, SPACEHAB
completed one mission under the CMAM Contract, providing all of the revenue
reported for fiscal year 1995.
Costs of Revenue. Costs of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 1996
decreased 10.1% to $21.0 million, as compared to $23.3 million for fiscal year
1995. Integration, operations and transportation expenses for each of the nine
months ended June 30, 1996 and the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995 were
$14.2 million. These amounts are approximately equal in absolute dollars but,
when compared on a basis of nine months to twelve months, the fiscal 1996 cost
is higher. First, mission specific costs of $8.4 million for the nine months
ended June 30, 1996 supported two missions where mission specific costs of
$8.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1995 supported only one.
Second, sustaining engineering costs were $5.8 million in fiscal 1996 compared
with $6.0 million in fiscal 1995. Total integration, operations and
transportation costs were only marginally higher in 1996 even though they
supported two flights, thereby reducing the cost per flight for sustaining
engineering and reducing total cost per mission in fiscal 1996.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30,
1996 decreased 23.3% to $4.2 million, as compared to $5.4 million for fiscal
year 1995. The decrease is primarily because the reporting period for fiscal
1996 was nine months and the reporting period for fiscal year 1995 was twelve
months, coupled with a decrease in research and development expenses. There was
$0.1 million incurred for research and development expense for the nine months
ended June 30, 1996 as compared to $1.6 million for fiscal year 1995. The
expenditures for fiscal 1995 were used in the development of the SPACEHAB
Double Module which was required to perform the Mir Contract. Expenditures for
research and development associated with the new SPACEHAB Double Module for
microgravity and life sciences did not commence until July 1996. Marketing,
general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 1996
increased 6.3% to $4.1 million, as compared with $3.8 million during fiscal
year 1995. Components of the increase in fiscal 1996 include increases in
salaries and benefits of approximately $0.6 million for additional staff needed
for business development and project management, offset by $0.4 million in
expenses due to the shorter fiscal year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, net of capitalized amounts, for the
nine months ended June 30, 1996 decreased 48.8% to $0.7 million from $1.4
million for fiscal year 1995, primarily due to substantially lower average
revolving loan indebtedness under the Company's credit agreement (the "Credit
11
<PAGE> 12
Agreement") for the nine months ended June 30, 1996. The lower average
revolving loan indebtedness was a result of repayments by the Company during
the nine months ended June 30, 1996 of $7.4 million on interest bearing debt.
An amount outstanding of $5.5 million due to a group of insurance companies
under the Credit Agreement during the nine months ended June 30, 1996 remained
non-interest bearing.
Interest Income. Interest income for the nine months ended June 30, 1996
increased to $1.2 million from $0.1 million due to the investment of
approximately $40.0 million of the initial public offering proceeds in short
term, low risk commercial paper and interest bearing cash accounts.
Net Income. Net income for the nine months ended June 30, 1996 increased
88.7% to $29.8 million as compared to $15.8 million for fiscal year 1995.
Income tax expense for these periods was $1.9 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, due to the Company's use of available net operating loss
carryforwards, offset by alternative minimum taxes. As of June 30, 1996, the
Company had approximately $17.0 million of available net operating loss
carryforwards expiring between 2006 and 2009 to offset future regular taxable
income. Utilization of these net operating loss carryforwards may be subject
to limitations in the event of significant changes in the stock ownership of
the Company. There are no restrictions on transfers or sales of shares of
Common Stock that would prevent such a change from occurring.
Fiscal 1995 as Compared to Fiscal 1994.
Revenue. Revenue for fiscal year 1995 increased 5.3% to $46.1 million, as
compared with $43.8 million for fiscal year 1994. This increase is
attributable to the Company's completion in February 1995 of the third mission
under the CMAM Contract, for which NASA leased 50 lockers, as compared with the
completion in February 1994 of the second mission under the CMAM Contract, for
which NASA leased 46 lockers. During fiscal year 1994, the Company also
provided NASA with two additional lockers for which the Company received
revenue only for integration and operations services.
Costs of Revenue. Costs of revenue for fiscal year 1995 decreased 3.7% to
$23.3 million, as compared to $24.2 million for fiscal year 1994. Integration,
operations and transportation expenses for fiscal year 1995 decreased 6.0% to
$14.2 million, as compared with $15.1 million during fiscal year 1994. This
decrease is primarily attributable to a $1.0 million transportation charge the
Company incurred during fiscal year 1994.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for fiscal year 1995 increased 5.9%
to $5.4 million, as compared to $5.1 million for fiscal year 1994. Research
and development expenses for fiscal year 1995 were $1.6 million as compared
with no research and development expenses for fiscal year 1994. This increase
was the result of funds expended in connection with the development of the
SPACEHAB Double Module for logistics and cargo use under the Mir Contract. The
Company did not incur any research and development expense during fiscal year
1994 due primarily to the completion of the research and development
requirements for the SPACEHAB Single Module and restrictions contained in a
prior credit facility. Marketing, general and administrative expenses for
fiscal year 1995 decreased 25.5% to $3.8 million, as compared with $5.1 million
during fiscal year 1994. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $2.4
million insurance premium amortized by the Company during fiscal year 1994.
Prior to fiscal 1994, the Company was required under the terms of a prior bank
credit agreement to maintain insurance covering losses incurred by the Company
resulting from non-appropriation of funds for the CMAM Contract. Premium
payments for the insurance were paid through February 1994 and, as such,
remaining unamortized costs were written-off as of December 1993 when the
insurance policy was terminated in connection with the Company's 1993
refinancing. No such insurance was required by the Credit Agreement during
fiscal year 1995. The decline in insurance expense was partially offset by an
increase in salary expense during fiscal year 1995 as the Company hired
additional employees.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, net of capitalized amounts, for fiscal
year 1995 decreased 71.4% to $1.4 million from $4.9 million for fiscal year
1994, primarily due to the amortization of bank
12
<PAGE> 13
financing fees and the write-off of remaining unamortized bank financing fees
in conjunction with a 1993 refinancing in fiscal year 1994, and substantially
lower average revolving loan indebtedness under the Credit Agreement in fiscal
year 1995. The lower average revolving loan indebtedness was a result of
repayments by the Company during fiscal years 1994 and 1995 and the
reclassification of $21.5 million from revolving credit loans to a non-interest
bearing term loan. The refinancing in fiscal year 1994 provided the Company
with, among other things, a $21.5 million non-interest-bearing term loan from a
group of insurance companies and a revolving line of credit from McDonnell
Douglas. A portion of the proceeds from the non-interest-bearing term loan
were used to repay outstanding indebtedness under the prior bank credit
agreement which bore interest at a market rate.
Net Income. Net income for fiscal year 1995 increased 83.7% to $15.8
million as compared to $8.6 million for fiscal year 1994. The fiscal year 1994
period includes an extraordinary loss of $0.9 million as a result of the
write-off of unamortized deferred debt issuance costs in conjunction with the
refinancing. Income tax expense for these periods was minimal due to the
Company's use of available net operating loss carry-forwards.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has historically financed its capital expenditures, research
and development and working capital requirements through progress payments
under both the CMAM Contract and the Mir Contract, investments received in
private and public equity offerings and borrowings under credit facilities. On
December 21, 1995, SPACEHAB completed an initial public offering of 3,750,000
shares of Common Stock (the "Offering"). On January 21, 1996 the Underwriters
exercised their over allotment option for an additional 264,500 shares of
Common Stock. The Offering provided proceeds, net of offering costs, of
approximately $43.3 million.
Cash Flows From Operating Activities. Cash provided by operations for
fiscal years 1994, 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996 were $21.8
million, $26.8 million, and $13.2 million, respectively. Under both the CMAM
Contract and the Mir Contract, progress payments are structured such that
expenses incurred under these contracts are billed to NASA. NASA makes
progress payments under the CMAM Contract on specified dates for specified
amounts. Progress payments under the Mir Contract are billed to NASA monthly
at 95% of the costs incurred in the prior month. Revenue in the amount of $7.7
million remains to be recorded under the CMAM Contract. However, net cash flow
remaining under this contract is estimated to be only approximately $1.1
million. Due to proposed research and development activities in fiscal year
1997, the Company expects that net cash flow will be used in operating
activities during fiscal year 1997.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. For fiscal years 1994, 1995, and
the nine months ended June 30, 1996, cash flows used in investing activities
consisted only of capital expenditures of $0.1 million, $4.9 million, and $6.3
million, respectively. Substantially all of the expenditures prior to fiscal
year 1995 were for the construction and the development of two SPACEHAB Single
Modules. Expenditures during fiscal year 1995 and the nine months ended June
30, 1996 were for (i) the development and construction of a tunnel and an
adapter ring to be used in conjunction with the SPACEHAB Double Module and (ii)
structural upgrade work performed on the SPACEHAB structural test article so
that it can be attached to an existing SPACEHAB Single Module to form a
SPACEHAB Double Module. The Company invested a total of $11.9 million in the
development and construction of the SPACEHAB Double Module during fiscal years
1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996.
The Company also anticipates additional expenditures of approximately $13.3
million for capital asset additions over the next twelve months. Of this
amount, the Company plans to use (i) $9.0 million to begin construction of an
additional aft module segment, fully outfitted for science, to be joined with
an existing SPACEHAB Single Module to form an additional SPACEHAB Double Module
to support science follow-on missions in 1998; (ii) $0.9 million to expand the
size of the SPACEHAB payload processing
13
<PAGE> 14
facility; (iii) $1.0 million to selectively acquire complementary businesses,
engineering facilities and hardware; and (iv) $2.4 million to enhance the
Logistics Double Module to increase its load capacity. In addition, the
Company anticipates, over the next twelve months, investing $1.0 million in an
incubator opportunity to develop products stemming from microgravity research.
The Company expects to continue funding any additional capital expenditures or
working capital requirements from the remaining proceeds of the Offering,
internally generated cash flow from progress payments under contracts and
through future debt and/or equity offerings.
Cash Flows From Financing Activities. For fiscal years 1994, 1995, and the
nine months ended June 30, 1996, cash flow provided (used) by financing
activities were ($20.9) million, ($16.2) million, and $36.9 million
respectively.
On August 20, 1996, the Credit Agreement was amended and restated. Under
this amendment, the revolving credit commitment from McDonnell Douglas was
canceled. In addition, in exchange for the full satisfaction of two term loans
owed to a group of insurance companies, the Company paid $2.5 million to said
companies at closing and agreed to pay an additional $2.0 million under a new
non-interest bearing term loan. The new term loan is due in installments of
$0.5 million in each of August 1997 and 1998, and $0.333 million in each of
August 1999, 2000, and 2001. Under this new agreement all prior liens and
encumbrances on the Company's assets and all prior restrictive covenants have
been released.
The Company believes that its available cash and cash equivalents will be
sufficient to meet its cash flow deficit from operations and meet other funding
requirements for at least the next 12 months.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of ("Statement
121"). Statement 121 will require that the Company review its long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. To the extent that the
future cash inflows expected to be generated from an asset are less than the
related future cash outflows an impairment loss is recognized based on the
difference between the asset's carrying amount and its fair market value. The
Company is required to adopt Statement 121 during the year ending June 30,
1997. In the opinion of the management of the Company, the adoption of
Statement 121 will not have a material impact on the Company's financial
condition or results of operations.
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation ("Statement 123"). Under Statement 123, the Company may elect, but
is not required, to adopt a fair value approach to accounting for stock-based
awards granted to employees. The Company is required to adopt Statement 123 as
of July 1, 1996. The Company does not expect to implement the fair value
methodology of Statement 123, although certain pro forma disclosures will be
required beginning with the Company's fiscal 1997 financial statements.
14
<PAGE> 15
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors SPACEHAB, Incorporated:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of SPACEHAB, Incorporated as of
September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996, and the related statements of income,
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended September
30, 1994 and 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of SPACEHAB, Incorporated as of
September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995 and the nine months
ended June 30, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Washington, D.C.
August 5, 1996, except as to note 4 which is as of August 20, 1996
15
<PAGE> 16
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30,
ASSETS 1995 1996
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $7,041,020 50,795,548
Receivable from NASA (note 8) 5,565,092 5,445,765
Prepaid expenses 52,974 184,660
------ -------
Total current assets 12,659,086 56,425,973
---------- ----------
Property and equipment:
Flight modules 82,564,169 94,477,790
Module improvements in progress 6,081,081 -
Payload processing facility 3,174,802 3,384,667
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 391,111 615,036
------- -------
92,211,163 98,477,493
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (21,599,797) (27,987,042)
------------ ------------
Property and equipment, net 70,611,366 70,490,451
---------- ----------
Deferred mission costs 3,150,689 2,705,422
Other assets, net 280,259 86,769
------- ------
$86,701,400 129,708,615
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Loan payable under credit agreement, current portion
(note 4) $120,000 2,500,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 1,277,412 3,270,882
Accrued consulting and subcontracting services due to
McDonnell Douglas 4,069,980 4,712,733
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 5,467,392 10,483,615
Loans payable under credit agreement, net of current portion
(note 4) 14,657,373 6,179,063
Notes payable to shareholder (note 5) 9,116,828 9,968,503
Convertible note payable (note 6) 1,111,321 1,170,338
Deferred flight revenue 58,063,296 30,311,227
---------- ----------
Total liabilities 88,416,210 58,112,746
---------- ----------
Commitments (notes 12 and 13)
Stockholders' equity (deficit) (notes 9 and 10):
Convertible preferred stock, no par value, authorized
4,230,000 shares, issued and outstanding, 4,011,345
and 0 shares, respectively 2,310,670 -
Common stock, no par value, authorized 30,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 5,083,427 and 11,069,237 shares,
respectively 34,070,094 79,862,700
Additional paid-in capital 16,299 16,299
Accumulated deficit (38,111,873) (8,283,130)
------------ -----------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (1,714,810) 71,595,869
----------- ----------
$86,701,400 129,708,615
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
16
<PAGE> 17
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
NINE MONTHS ENDED
1994 1995 JUNE 30, 1996
--------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue $43,799,560 46,059,000 56,397,000
----------- ---------- ----------
Costs of revenue:
Integration, operations and transportation 15,115,685 14,155,419 14,220,334
Depreciation 8,256,417 8,256,417 6,192,313
Insurance 854,610 937,250 572,500
------- ------- -------
Total costs of revenue 24,226,712 23,349,086 20,985,147
---------- ---------- ----------
Gross profit 19,572,848 22,709,914 35,411,853
---------- ---------- ----------
Operating expenses:
Marketing, general and administrative 5,063,530 3,815,536 4,055,680
Research and development - 1,600,000 100,000
- --------- -------
Total operating expenses 5,063,530 5,415,536 4,155,680
--------- --------- ---------
Income from operations 14,509,318 17,294,378 31,256,173
Interest expense and amortization of debt
issuance costs, net of capitalized
interest (note 3) (4,863,332) (1,364,520) (698,997)
Interest and other income, net 32,905 114,662 1,183,462
------ ------- ---------
Net income before income taxes 9,678,891 16,044,520 31,740,638
Income tax expense (note 11) 106,473 235,664 1,911,895
------- ------- ---------
Net income before extraordinary item 9,572,418 15,808,856 29,828,743
Extraordinary item - loss on debt 934,381 - -
extinguishment (note 2) ------- - -
Net income $8,638,037 15,808,856 29,828,743
========== ========== ==========
Net income per common and common equivalent share:
Net income before extraordinary item $1.44 2.37 3.21
Extraordinary item (0.14) - -
------ - -
$1.30 2.37 3.21
===== ==== ====
Shares used in computing net income per common
and common equivalent share 6,659,572 6,671,346 9,303,487
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
17
<PAGE> 18
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONVERTIBLE
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK
----------------------------- -----------------------------
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT
-------------- ---------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at September 30, 1993 3,999,345 $2,298,670 4,883,427 $30,350,094
Common stock issued upon stock option
exercises - - 25,000 60,000
Preferred stock issued to consultant 12,000 12,000 - -
Net income - - - -
- - - -
Balance at September 30, 1994 4,011,345 2,310,670 4,908,427 30,410,094
Common stock issued upon stock option
exercises - - 25,000 60,000
Common stock issued in private placement
(note 9) - - 150,000 3,600,000
Net income - - - -
- - - -
Balance at September 30, 1995 4,011,345 2,310,670 5,083,427 34,070,094
Common stock issued upon stock option
exercises - - 75,000 180,000
Common stock issued in public offering,
net of expenses (note 9) - - 4,014,500 43,301,936
Common stock issued upon conversion
of preferred stock (note 9) (4,011,345) (2,310,670) 1,671,312 2,310,670
Common stock issued in private placement
guarantee (note 9) - - 224,998 -
Net income - - - -
- - - -
Balance at June 30, 1996 - $- 11,069,237 $79,862,700
= == ========== ===========
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONAL TOTAL
PAID-IN ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
CAPITAL DEFICIT EQUITY (DEFICIT)
-------- --------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at September 30, 1993 $16,299 $(62,558,766) $(29,893,703)
Common stock issued upon stock option exercises - - 60,000
Preferred stock issued to consultant - - 12,000
Net income - 8,638,037 8,638,037
- --------- ---------
Balance at September 30, 1994 16,299 (53,920,729) (21,183,666)
Common stock issued upon stock option exercises - - 60,000
Common stock issued in private placement (note 9) - - 3,600,000
Net income - 15,808,856 15,808,856
- ---------- ----------
Balance at September 30, 1995 16,299 (38,111,873) (1,714,810)
Common stock issued upon stock option exercises - - 180,000
Common stock issued in public offering, net of
expenses (note 9) - - 43,301,936
Common stock issued upon conversion
of preferred stock (note 9) - - -
Common stock issued in private placement
guarantee (note 9) - - -
Net income - 29,828,743 29,828,743
- ---------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 1996 $16,299 $(8,283,130) $71,595,869
======= ============ ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
18
<PAGE> 19
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------------- NINE MONTHS ENDED
1994 1995 JUNE 30, 1996
--------------- --------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
Net income $8,638,037 $15,808,856 $29,828,743
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 8,482,149 8,489,642 6,387,245
Amortization of financing fees 826,423 - -
Loss on debt extinguishment 934,381 - -
Payment of operating expenses with 12,000 - -
preferred stock
Interest converted to notes payable 64,219 1,480,772 1,424,513
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in accounts
receivable - (5,565,092) 119,327
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses 2,464,358 (9,360) (131,686)
Decrease (increase) in deferred mission
costs (385,591) 251,494 445,267
Decrease (increase) in patent rights
and other assets 9,628 (227,872) 193,490
Increase (decrease) in deferred flight
revenue (595,560) 3,955,856 (27,752,069)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
and accrued expenses 43,531 674,600 1,993,470
Increase (decrease) in accrued consulting
and subcontracting services 1,337,869 1,978,940 642,753
--------- --------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 21,831,444 26,837,836 13,151,053
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows used by investing activities - purchase
of property and equipment (75,556) (4,942,876) (6,266,330)
-------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows used by financing activities:
Proceeds from note payable to banks 1,500,000 - -
Payment of note payable to banks (43,850,000) - -
Proceeds from note payable to insurers 21,500,000 150,000 -
Payment of note payable to insurers - (9,707,045) (3,854,079)
Proceeds from note payable to shareholder 15,695,724 11,229,054 7,358,661
Payment of note payable to shareholder (15,800,000) (21,537,965) (10,116,713)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 60,000 60,000 180,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of - 3,600,000 43,301,936
expenses - --------- ----------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (20,894,276) (16,205,956) 36,869,805
------------ ------------ ----------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 861,612 5,689,004 43,754,528
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 490,404 1,352,016 7,041,020
------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $1,352,016 $7,041,020 $50,795,548
========== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
19
<PAGE> 20
SPACEHAB, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
================================================================================
(1) DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY
SPACEHAB, Incorporated (the Company) is the first company to commercially
develop, own and operate habitable modules that provide space-based
laboratory research facilities and cargo services aboard the U.S. Space
Shuttle system. The Company currently owns and operates two pressurized
laboratory modules which significantly enhance the capabilities of the
Space Shuttle fleet. The Company's modules are unique to the U.S. Space
Shuttle.
To date, the Company has successfully completed five missions aboard the
Space Shuttle and substantially all of the Company's revenue has been
generated under contracts with NASA. The Company's contracts are subject
to periodic funding allocations by NASA. NASA's funding is dependent on
receiving annual appropriations from the United States Government.
(2) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
FISCAL YEAR
Effective October 1, 1995, the Company changed its fiscal year-end from
September 30 to June 30. Accordingly, the accompanying financial
statements present the Company's results of operations for the years ended
September 30, 1994 and 1995 and for the nine months ended June 30, 1996.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of its statements of cash flows, the Company considers
short-term investments with original maturities of 3 months or less to be
cash equivalents. The Company intends to hold all of these investments to
maturity and as such are recognized at cost plus accrued interest. As of
June 30, 1996, the Company's short-term investments included approximately
$35.0 million invested in Federal government agencies and treasury
securities. Additionally, the Company had approximately $6.0 million
invested in commercial paper. The amortized cost of such investments
approximates market value.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost. The Company's flight modules
are depreciated over a ten-year period using the straight-line method. All
furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The
payload processing facility is amortized using the straight-line method
over the term of the land lease.
In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed of (Statement
121). Statement 121 will require that the Company review its long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. To the extent that the
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated from an asset are
less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is
recognized based on
20
<PAGE> 21
the difference between the asset's carrying amount and its fair market
value. The Company is required to adopt Statement 121 during the year
ending June 30, 1997. In the opinion of management of the Company, the
adoption of Statement 121 will not have a material impact on the Company's
financial condition or results of operations.
DEFERRED MISSION COSTS
Deferred mission costs are expenses directly related to specific missions
which are recognized as cost of revenue as the respective missions are
completed.
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS
Debt issuance costs associated with the note payable to the banks were
deferred and amortized using the effective interest method through December
29, 1993, the date of the refinancing (note 4). The unamortized deferred
debt issuance costs associated with the note payable to the banks were
written off as of that date, and recognized as an extraordinary loss in the
statement of income for the year ended September 30, 1994.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized upon completion of each flight. Total contract price
is allocated to each flight based on the amount of services the Company
provides on the flight relative to the total services provided for all
flights under contract. Obligations associated with a specific mission,
e.g., integration services, are also recognized upon completion of the
mission.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes income taxes under the asset and liability method of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes (Statement 109). Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Statement 109,
the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Income per common and common equivalent share is calculated by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares, to the extent dilutive, during the period. Common stock equivalents
are comprised of common stock options and warrants and convertible
preferred stock. Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin Topic 4:D, stock issued and stock options granted
during the 12-month period preceding the
21
<PAGE> 22
date of the Company's initial public offering have been included in the
calculation of weighted average shares of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding for all periods through the date of the initial public
offering using the treasury stock method, based on the initial public
offering price per share (note 9).
The computation of income per common and common equivalent share, assuming
full dilution, includes all other common stock that potentially may be
issued as a result of conversion privileges, including the convertible note
payable (note 6). Any reduction of less than 3 percent in the aggregate has
not been considered dilutive in the presentation of income per common share,
assuming full dilution.
All computations of income per common share include the effect of the 1 for
2.4 reverse split of common stock (note 9).
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reported periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain 1994 and 1995 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 1996
financial statement presentation.
(3) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
The Company exercised its option under the Space Systems Development
Agreement (SSDA) with NASA to defer certain progress payments prior to the
termination of such contract in fiscal 1995 (note 8). Progress payments of
$8,940,079 were deferred by the Company during the year ended September 30,
1994.
Cash paid for interest costs was approximately $3,900,000, $513,000 and
$264,000 for the years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995, and the nine
months ended June 30, 1996, respectively. The Company capitalized interest
of approximately $262,000 and $766,000 during the year ended September 30,
1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996, respectively, to the module
improvements in progress. No amounts were capitalized during the year ended
September 30, 1994.
The Company paid $35,125, $140,456 and $239,154 for income taxes during the
years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995 and the nine months ended June 30,
1996, respectively.
As of the date of the refinancing (note 4), the Company converted
$13,105,900 of accrued consulting and subcontracting services to a loan
payable under credit agreement.
(4) LOANS PAYABLE UNDER CREDIT AGREEMENT
During 1991, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement with a
group of banks. Under this agreement, the Company had an original
commitment from the banks for $64 million which was
22
<PAGE> 23
reduced in accordance with the agreement to $46 million as of October 1,
1993. Each borrowing under this original revolving credit agreement bore
interest at the Company's choice of either the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 3 percent, or the greater of the prime rate plus 2 percent or
the federal funds rate plus 2.5 percent. The rates on borrowings
outstanding from October 1, 1991 to December 29, 1993, the date of the
refinancing discussed below, ranged from 6.125 percent to 8 percent.
Borrowings under the original revolving credit agreement were secured by all
assets and cash proceeds from contracts of the Company. The Company was
restricted by the terms of the agreement from certain transactions,
including the payment of dividends. Under the terms of the original
agreement, the Company was also required to obtain certain insurance against
events which could terminate the Spacehab program. The Company obtained the
required insurance from a group of insurance companies, with the group of
banks as named beneficiaries.
On December 29, 1993, the Company entered into an amended and restated
credit agreement between the Company, the insurance companies, and McDonnell
Douglas Corporation (McDonnell Douglas), a shareholder, pursuant to which
the insurance companies provided the Company with a $21,500,000
noninterest-bearing term loan. This refinancing resulted in the recognition
of no gain or loss. The proceeds of the term loan were used to extinguish
all debts to the group of banks under the original revolving credit
agreement, pay McDonnell Douglas $2,000,000 for accrued consulting and
subcontracting services, and provide working capital for the Company. Prior
to the $2,000,000 payment on December 29, 1993, the Company was obligated
for accrued consulting and subcontracting services to McDonnell Douglas for
a total of $15,105,900. As of December 29, 1993, the remaining amounts due
to McDonnell Douglas were converted to amounts due under a new revolving
credit agreement, bearing interest at l percent per month. At the option of
the Company, McDonnell Douglas' subsequent monthly invoices for services
rendered under the CMAM construction and integration and operations
contracts could be added to the outstanding balance under the revolving line
of credit, up to a maximum of $19,500,000 through December 31, 1994, and a
maximum of $9,000,000 thereafter until maturity on December 31, 1996.
Under the amended and restated credit agreement, the Company was required to
pay the insurance companies all amounts appropriated by Congress and
allocated by NASA to the CMAM contract (note 8) in excess of $21,626,000 and
$2,253,000 during the years ended September 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively;
remaining amounts due under the term loan were due no later than September
30, 2001.
In July 1995, the credit agreement was further amended, such that the term
loan with the insurance companies was segregated into two new term loans: a
$6,458,000 term loan bearing interest at 1 percent per month due no later
than August 31, 1998 (Tranche A Term Loan), and a $5,495,000
noninterest-bearing term loan due no later than August 31, 2001 (Tranche B
Term Loan).
As a result of the July 1995 amendment, the revolving credit agreement with
McDonnell Douglas was extended, with a maximum amount outstanding of
$9,000,000 through December 31, 1995, and a maximum of $6,000,000 thereafter
through maturity on December 31, 1998. Amounts outstanding bore interest at
the rate of 1 percent per month. Under this amendment, the Company had the
option to add McDonnell Douglas' monthly invoices for services rendered
under the Mir construction and integration and operations contracts (note
13), as well as the CMAM integration and operations contract up to the
available maximum borrowing amount. As of September 30, 1995, the revolving
credit loan due McDonnell Douglas had an outstanding balance of $2,692,713.
With respect to the Tranche A Term Loan, the Company was required to repay a
minimum principal amount of $10,000 per month. Accordingly, $120,000 was
classified as current in the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30,
1995. As of September 30, 1995, the Tranche A Term Loan had an aggregate
outstanding balance of $6,589,660. During the nine months ended June 30,
1996 and in accordance with the terms of the credit agreement, an aggregate
of 15 percent of the net proceeds from
23
<PAGE> 24
the Company's initial public offering (note 9) were used to repay pro rata
the then outstanding balances of the revolving credit loan and the Tranche A
Term Loan. As of June 30, 1996, the Tranche A Term Loan had an outstanding
balance of $3,179,000, and no amounts were outstanding under the revolving
credit loan due to McDonnell Douglas.
In August 1996, the credit agreement was again amended and restated. Under
this amendment, the revolving credit commitment from McDonnell Douglas was
canceled. In exchange for the full satisfaction of the Tranche A Term Loan
and the Tranche B Term Loan, the Company paid the insurance companies
$2,500,000 and agreed to pay an additional $2,000,000 under a new
noninterest-bearing term loan. The new term loan is due in installments of
$500,000 on each of August 1, 1997 and 1998, and $333,333 on each of August
1, 1999, 2000 and 2001.
Aggregate interest cost incurred on the debts due under the credit agreement
was approximately $1,500,000, $524,000 and $561,000 for the years ended
September 30, 1994 and 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996,
respectively.
(5) NOTES PAYABLE TO SHAREHOLDER
The Company issued subordinated notes for a portion of the amount due to
Alenia Spazio S.p.A. (Alenia), a shareholder, under a previously completed
construction contract for the Company's flight modules. Such notes had an
aggregate outstanding balance of $9,116,828 and $9,968,503 at September 30,
1995 and June 30, 1996, respectively. The notes bear interest at an annual
rate of 12 percent, compounded quarterly, with all accrued interest payable
45 days after the first mission under the CMAM contract and semiannually
thereafter. However, during the year ended September 30, 1995, Alenia
agreed to defer the payment of interest and principal until November 1998.
Principal on the notes is due at the earlier of 45 days after the seventh
launch under the Mir contract or June 15, 1997; however, no amount of
principal on the notes is due until all amounts under the amended and
restated credit agreement (note 4) are repaid. Interest cost incurred on
the notes to Alenia was approximately $970,000, $1,017,000 and $846,000 for
the years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995 and the nine months ended June
30, 1996, respectively.
(6) CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE
On August 12, 1992, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note to an
investment bank in the amount of $900,000, carrying interest at LIBOR plus 3
percent, and maturing six months after the payment of all other indebtedness
due under the amended and restated credit agreement and the subordinated
notes to Alenia. Through June 30, 1996, the Company had elected to defer
the payment of interest under the note, which interest has been converted to
additional outstanding principal. The note had an amount outstanding of
$1,111,321 and $1,170,338 at September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996,
respectively. The original principal amount of the note may be converted at
the option of the holder into common stock of the Company, at a conversion
rate of $12.00 per share, at any time prior to maturity.
Interest cost incurred on this subordinated promissory note was
approximately $64,000, $82,000 and $58,000 for the years ended September 30,
1994 and 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996, respectively.
24
<PAGE> 25
(7) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values
of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 1996 in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30, 1996
--------------------
CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Financial liabilities:
Loans payable under credit
agreement $8,679,062 $3,946,000
Note payable to shareholder 9,968,503 9,968,503
Convertible note payable 1,170,338 1,170,338
========= =========
</TABLE>
The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated based on the
current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining
maturities, and taking into consideration the terms of the August 1996
amended and restated credit agreement (note 4). The carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivable from NASA and
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair market value
because of the relatively short duration of these instruments.
(8) NASA CONTRACTS
COMMERCIAL MIDDECK AUGMENTATION MODULE CONTRACT
On November 30, 1990, NASA and the Company entered into the Commercial
Middeck Augmentation Module contract (CMAM) to lease to the U.S. government
a portion of the middeck augmentation modules and related integration
services at an aggregate firm fixed price of $184,236,000 over six missions.
During the year ended September 30, 1994, the terms of the CMAM contract
were amended to reduce the number of missions from six to five, although the
total locker space leased by NASA and the contract value remained the same.
NASA has agreed to pay the Company progress payments based on achieving
certain integration milestones. During the years ended September 30, 1994
and 1995, and the nine months ended June 30, 1996, NASA made progress
payments of $43,204,000, $35,377,000, and $8,857,000, respectively, to the
Company.
During the years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995, and the nine months
ended June 30, 1996, the Company recognized $43,799,560, $46,059,000, and
45,634,000, respectively, of revenue under the CMAM contract.
MIR SPACE STATION CONTRACT
On July 14, 1995, NASA and the Company completed final negotiations to lease
the Company's flight modules and provide related integration services over
four missions to the Russian Space Station Mir during 1996 and 1997, at an
aggregate firm fixed price of $53,980,000. During December 1995, the
contract was amended whereby the contract price was reduced to $52,128,800
in exchange for the indemnification by NASA of certain damage to or loss of
the modules during flight.
25
<PAGE> 26
NASA pays the Company progress payments on a monthly basis. During the year
ended September 30, 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996, the
Company received $9,072,764 and $19,907,258, respectively, from NASA
relating to the contract.
During the nine months ended June 30, 1996, the Company recognized
$10,772,000 of revenue under the contract relating to completion of the
first contract mission. As of June 30, 1996, the Company had $3,724,476 of
progress billings outstanding from NASA and $1,721,289 of unbilled
retainages due from NASA. All of these amounts are expected to be collected
within the next 12 months.
SPACE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
On August 11, 1988, the Company and NASA executed the SSDA, pursuant to
which NASA agreed to provide launch and associated transportation services
for the first eight missions of the Company's Space Shuttle middeck
augmentation modules. The terms of the SSDA were amended at various times
through September 30, 1994.
During the year ended September 30, 1995, the terms of the SSDA were further
amended incorporating new launch dates for the remaining CMAM missions and
eliminating approximately $18,200,000 of previously accrued deferred launch
costs and associated interest charges. Under the terms of the amended SSDA,
launches five through eight and all associated transportation charges to the
Company were deleted. As of June 30, 1996, the SSDA has expired.
During the year ended September 30, 1994, the Company incurred and paid
approximately $1,039,000 to NASA under the SSDA relating to the first and
second missions, respectively, which costs are included in costs of revenue
in the accompanying statements of income. During the year ended September
30, 1995 and the nine months ended June 30, 1996, the Company incurred no
transportation costs related to CMAM missions three and four, as these
missions were dedicated to U.S. government use.
(9) STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
In December 1995 and January 1996, the Company sold, through an underwritten
initial public offering, 4,014,500 common shares at $12.00 per share, which
resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $43,300,000 after
associated commissions and discounts, and other expenses of the offering.
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
Prior to the initial public offering, on December 11, 1995, the Company's
Board of Directors effected a 1 for 2.4 reverse split of common stock
whereby each 2.4 shares of existing common stock were exchanged for one
share of common stock. All share and per share data appearing in the
financial statements and notes thereto have been retroactively adjusted for
this reverse split.
PRIVATE EQUITY PLACEMENT
During August 1995, the Company completed the sale of 150,000 shares of its
common stock to five investors for an aggregate price of $3,600,000. The
terms of sale included a guarantee by the Company
26
<PAGE> 27
that in the event of the completion of an initial public offering prior to
December 31, 1996, the investors would realize no less than a 25 percent
premium on their investment based on the initial offering price. In the
event that the minimum premium was not realized, the Company had the option
to pay to the investors the difference between the initial public offering
price and the guaranteed minimum price in cash or additional shares of
common stock. Based on the initial public offering price, the Company opted
to issue an aggregate of 224,998 common shares to the investors in
settlement of the guarantee.
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
As a result of the initial public offering of the Company's common stock,
all of the Company's preferred stock was automatically converted into common
stock on a 2.4 for 1 common share basis upon the effective date of the
offering in accordance with the terms of the preferred stock.
(10) COMMON STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
The Company provides grants of either incentive or non-qualified stock
options to employees and members of the Board of Directors. Prior to the
adoption of the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1994 Plan), stock options
granted to the Company's officers and employees were part of their
employment contract or offer. The number and price of the options granted
was defined in the employment agreements and such options vest over a period
of years. Under the 1994 Plan, the number and price of the options granted
to employees is determined by the Board of Directors and such options vest
incrementally over a period of four years and expire no more than ten years
after the date of grant.
Under the Directors' Stock Option Plan (the Directors' Plan), each
nonemployee member of the Board of Directors is annually granted options to
purchase 5,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices equal to the fair
market value at the date of grant. Options under the Directors' Plan vest
after one year and expire seven years from the date of grant.
The following summarizes all option activity for the periods presented:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
UNDERLYING OPTIONS PER SHARE EXERCISABLE
------------------ --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding September 30, 659,909 $2.40 - 12.00 543,248
Grants 301,027 12.00 - 24.00
Exercised 25,000 2.40
------ ----
Outstanding September 30, 935,936 2.40 - 13.20 658,855
Grants 302,068 12.00 - 24.00
Exercised 25,000 2.40
------ ----
Outstanding September 30, 1,213,004 2.40 - 24.00 792,176
Grants 280,000 12.00 - 14.88
Exercised 75,000 2.40
Expired 231,939 12.00 - 24.00
------- -------------
Outstanding June 30, 1996 1,186,065 $2.40 - 24.00 469,971
========= ============= =======
</TABLE>
The Company also has 744,264 currently exercisable warrants outstanding to
purchase the Company's common stock at prices ranging from $12.00 to $14.40
per share, with various expiration dates through June 1998. All such
warrants were issued at exercise prices equivalent to, or in excess of, the
determined fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of
issuance.
27
<PAGE> 28
(11) INCOME TAXES
THE COMPONENTS OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE ARE AS FOLLOWS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS
ENDED
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30,
1994 1995 1996
---------------- --------------- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $106,473 235,664 1,911,895
State and local - - -
- - -
106,473 235,664 1,911,895
------- ------- ---------
Deferred:
Federal - - -
State and local - - -
- - -
Income tax expense $106,473 235,664 1,911,895
======== ======= =========
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the expected amount of income tax expense by applying
the statutory federal income tax rate of 34 percent to income before taxes
to the actual amount of income tax expense recognized follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE MONTHS
ENDED
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30,
1994 1995 1996
----------------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected expense $2,973,133 5,455,137 10,791,817
Change in valuation allowance (2,867,773) (5,222,201) (8,884,006)
Other 1,113 2,728 4,084
----- ----- -----
Income tax expense $106,473 235,664 1,911,895
======== ======= =========
</TABLE>
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of
September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996 are presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30,
1995 1996
------------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $16,814,228 6,791,224
General business credit carryforwards 2,189,414 2,189,414
Alternative minimum tax credit 345,693 2,270,234
carryforwards
Capitalized research and development 7,251,278 6,099,099
costs
Other 495,175 248,000
------- -------
Total gross deferred tax assets 27,095,788 17,597,971
Less - valuation allowance 16,857,228 1,761,998
---------- ---------
Net deferred tax assets $10,238,560 15,835,973
=========== ==========
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment, principally
due to differences in depreciation $10,217,370 15,770,5 18
Prepaid insurance 21,190 65,455
------ ------
Total gross deferred tax liabilities 10,238,560 15,835,9 73
---------- -----------
Net deferred taxes $- -
== =
</TABLE>
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of October 1, 1993 and
1994 was $26,437,627 and $23,028,141, respectively. The net changes in the
total valuation allowance for the years ended September 30, 1994 and 1995
and the nine months ended June 30, 1996 were decreases of $3,409,486,
$6,170,913 and $15,095,230, respectively.
At June 30, 1995, the Company had accumulated net operating losses of
approximately $16,978,000 available to offset future regular taxable income.
These operating loss carryforwards expire between
28
<PAGE> 29
the years 2006 and 2009. Utilization of these net operating losses may be
subject to limitations in the event of significant changes in stock
ownership of the Company.
Additionally, the Company has approximately $2,189,000 and $2,270,000 of
research and experimentation and alternative minimum tax credit
carryforwards, respectively, available to offset future regular tax
liabilities. The research and experimentation credits expire between the
years 2001 and 2007; the alternative minimum tax credits carryforward
indefinitely.
(12) EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
During the year ended September 30, 1995, the Company implemented a defined
contribution retirement plan which covers all employees and officers. No
contributions were made by the Company during the year ended September 30,
1995 or the nine months ended June 30, 1996. The Company has the right, but
not the obligation, to make contributions to the plan in future years at the
discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
(13) COMMITMENTS
INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS CONTRACTS
The Company has a cost-plus-fee contract with McDonnell Douglas for standard
integration and operation services for up to eight missions aboard the Space
Shuttle relating to missions under the CMAM contract. The maximum estimated
amount to be payable under this contract is $68.4 million. The period of
performance on this contract began on November 1, 1989 and is expected to
continue through 1996. At September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996,
approximately $48,800,000 and $54,000,000, respectively, had been incurred
by the Company cumulatively under this contract.
The Company has entered into a second cost-plus-fee contract with McDonnell
Douglas for standard integration and operations of four missions aboard the
Space Shuttle relating to missions to the Mir Space Station. The maximum
estimated amount to be payable under this contract is $28.1 million. The
period of performance on this contract began in November 1994 and is
expected to continue through June 1997. At September 30, 1995 and June 30,
1996, approximately $4,300,000 and $11,700,000, respectively, had been
incurred by the Company under this contract.
CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
The Company has entered into a cost-plus-fee contract with McDonnell Douglas
for the design and manufacture of an additional aft module segment to be
joined with one of the Company's existing flight modules for purposes of
fulfilling the Mir Space Station contract with NASA. The estimated amount
to be payable under this contract is $13.9 million. The period of
performance on this contract began in November 1994 and was substantially
completed in June 1996. At September 30, 1995 and June 30, 1996
approximately $7,300,000 and $12,400,000, respectively, had been incurred by
the Company under this contract.
LEASES
The Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases for office
space, storage space, and the land for the payload processing facility.
Future minimum payments under these noncancelable operating leases are as
follows:
29
<PAGE> 30
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, AMOUNT
-------------------- ----------
<S> <C>
1997 $328,000
1998 315,000
1999 211,000
2000 217,000
2001 148,000
-------
$1,219,000
==========
</TABLE>
Rent expense for the years ended September 30, 1994, and 1995 and the
nine months ended June 30, 1996 was approximately $217,000, $211,000, and
$183,000, respectively.
================================================================================
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
DIRECTORS (AND DIRECTOR NOMINEES)
HIRONORI AIHARA
Mr. Aihara (age 58) has served as a director of the Company since April
1992. Mr. Aihara has held various executive level positions with Mitsubishi
Corporation, including Managing Director of Information Systems and Services
Group from June 1990 until the present.
ROBERT A. CITRON
Mr. Citron (age 63) founded SPACEHAB in 1983 and was its Chairman of the
Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer from 1983 to 1987.
Mr. Citron is currently the President of Kistler Aerospace Corporation, a
Seattle-based space technology company.
DR. EDWARD E. DAVID, JR.
Dr. David (age 71) has served as a director of the Company since August
1993. Dr. David is currently the President of EED, Inc., advisors to industry,
government and academia on technology, research and innovation. Dr. David was
Science Advisor to President Nixon and Director of the White House Office of
Science and Technology from 1970 to 1973. He has also served as President of
Exxon Research and Engineering Company from 1977 to 1986, and as Executive
Director of Bell Telephone Laboratories from 1950 to 1970. Dr. David is also
a director of California Microwave, Inc., Intermagnetics General Corporation,
and Protein Polymer Technologies Inc.
30
<PAGE> 31
DR. SHELLEY A. HARRISON
Dr. Harrison (age 53) has served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer
since April 1996, Chairman of the Board of Directors since August 1993 and has
been a member of the Company's Board of Directors since 1987. Dr. Harrison was
a Member of Technical Staff at Bell Telephone Laboratories and a Professor of
Electrical Sciences at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. In
1973, Dr. Harrison co-founded Symbol Technologies Inc., the world's leading
provider of bar-code laser scanners and portable terminals where he served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until 1982. As President of Harrison
Enterprises from 1982 to 1986, he managed venture financings and technology
start-ups. Since 1987, Dr. Harrison has been a managing general partner of a
high technology venture capital fund, Poly Ventures, L.P. ("Poly Ventures").
Dr. Harrison is also a director of NetManage, Inc. and several privately held
high technology portfolio companies. He is Chairman of the New York State
Center for Advanced Technology in Telecommunications and a Trustee of
Polytechnic University.
DR. SHI H. HUANG
Dr. Huang (age 70) has served as a director of the Company since July 1990.
Dr. Huang is the Chairman of the Board of Chinfon Global Corp., a Republic of
China on Taiwan-based conglomerate, which operates 28 affiliated companies in
such fields as automobile/motorcycle manufacturing, banking, and trading.
Since 1989, Dr. Huang has also served as the Chairman of SPACEHAB Taiwan, Inc.,
a corporation organized as an investment vehicle for certain Company investors
from the Republic of China. Except for its ownership of Common Stock, SPACEHAB
Taiwan, Inc. has no other affiliation with the Company.
CHESTER M. LEE (Director Nominee)
Mr. Lee (age 77) has served as President of the Company since April 1996.
Prior to assuming his current responsibilities, Mr. Lee served as the Company's
Vice President-Operations since November 1987. Prior to joining SPACEHAB, Mr.
Lee worked for NASA for 23 years. His last position at NASA was Assistant
Associate Administrator for Policy, Planning, and Department of Defense-Affairs
in the Office of Space Flight at NASA. While working at NASA, Mr. Lee held
various other senior positions, including Director of Shuttle Customer Services
Division, Director of Space Transportation Utilization Division, Director of
Space Transportation Systems Operations, and Apollo Mission Director for Apollo
flights 12 through 17 to the moon.
GORDON S. MACKLIN (Director Nominee)
Mr. Macklin (age 68) has been Chairman of White River Corporation since
1993. From 1987 to 1992, he was Chairman of Hambrecht & Quist, LLC. Mr.
Macklin served as President of The National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. from 1970 to 1987, and was formerly a partner and Member of the Executive
Committee of McDonald & Company, an investment banking firm, from 1950 to 1970.
Mr. Macklin is a director, trustee, or managing general partner, as the case
may be, of 53 of the investment companies in the Franklin/Templeton Group, and
a director of Fund American, MCI Communications Corporation, Fusion Systems
Corp., MedImmune, Inc., Source One Mortgage Services Corp. and Shoppers Express
Inc. Mr. Macklin currently serves as a consultant to the Company.
DR. BRAD M. MESLIN
Dr. Meslin (age 37) has served as a director of the Company since April 1985
and as a Vice President of the Company from December 1984 to April 1985. Since
1984, Dr. Meslin has served as Managing Director of CSP Associates, Inc.
("CSP"), an international aerospace and defense management consulting firm.
Dr. Meslin currently serves as a consultant to the Company.
31
<PAGE> 32
DR. UDO POLLVOGT
Dr. Pollvogt (age 58) has served as a director of the Company since August
1993. Dr. Pollvogt is currently Executive Vice President for Government
Relations of Daimler-Benz. Prior to that, he was the President of the Space
Infrastructure Division of Deutsche Aerospace AG from 1991 to 1995 and Vice
President of the Columbus Program of MBB-ERNO Raumfahrnechnik GmbH, an
aerospace corporation, from 1990 to 1991.
ALVIN L. REESER
Mr. Reeser (age 68) has served as a director of the Company since August
1991. Mr. Reeser was President and Chief Executive Officer of SPACEHAB from
August 1991 until his retirement in October 1994. Prior to joining SPACEHAB,
Mr. Reeser was the Executive Vice President and General Manager of USBI Co., an
aerospace corporation, from March 1987 to August 1991.
JAMES R. THOMPSON
Mr. Thompson (age 60) has served as a director of the Company since August
1993. Mr. Thompson is a director, Executive Vice President and General Manager
of the Launch Systems Group of OSC, which he joined following his service as
NASA's Deputy Administrator from 1989 to 1991. Prior to that, Mr. Thompson
served as Director of the Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Alabama
from September 1986 to July 1989. Mr. Thompson is also a director of Nichols
Research Corporation.
PROF. ERNESTO VALLERANI
Professor Vallerani (age 60) has served as a director of the Company since
July 1990. Professor Vallerani is President and a director of Alenia Spazio.
Professor Vallerani has more than 30 years experience in international
aerospace projects.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information regarding the executive officers of the Company can be found in
Part I of this report.
STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENTS
Four stockholders of the Company have entered into separate letter
agreements in which each agreed to vote its shares of Common Stock to elect the
Nominee proposed by Mitsubishi Corporation. Mr. Aihara is such nominee.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10%
of the Company's Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Such
directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by
SEC regulation to furnish to the Company copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.
Based solely on the Company's review of copies of such forms that it
received, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the
Company believes that, during fiscal year 1996, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements were satisfied on a timely basis.
32
<PAGE> 33
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation paid by the Company for the
last three fiscal years to its Chief Executive Officer and the Company's four
other most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive
Officer (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers").
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL COMPENSATION LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Securities
Name and Fiscal Bonus Annual Underlying
Principal Position Year Salary($) ($) Comp.($)(1) Options/SARs(#)
------------------ ---- ---------- --- --------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison........ 1996(2) 8,546 35,117 125,685(3) 420,000
Chairman and Chief 1995 -- -- -- --
Executive Officer 1994 -- -- -- --
(effective April 10, 1996)
Richard P. Hora................ 1996(2) 131,250 -- 97,705(4) --
Former Chief Executive 1995 157,500 23,000 98,000(5) 166,667
Officer and President 1994 -- -- -- --
(resignation effective April
10, 1996)
Chester M. Lee................. 1996(2) 109,375 31,945 -- 110,416
President 1995 112,467 15,000 -- --
1994 108,333 -- -- 27,083
David A. Rossi................. 1996(2) 112,500 32,652 -- 29,166
Senior Vice President - 1995 116,094 50,000 -- --
Business Development 1994 106,250 -- -- 41,666
John M. Lounge................. 1996(2) 98,059 28,638 -- 25,000
Vice President - Operations 1995 108,900 10,000 -- --
1994 107,375 -- -- 16,666
Margaret E. Grayson............ 1996(2) 93,750 28,638 -- --
Vice President of Finance 1995 102,708 15,000 -- --
(CFO), Treasurer and 1994 4,166 -- -- 33,332
Assistant Secretary
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 34
(1) Except as indicated, no executive named in the above table received Other
Annual Compensation in an amount in excess of the lesser of either
$50,000 or 10% of the total of salary and bonus reported for him in the
two preceding columns.
(2) Fiscal year 1996 compensation figures are for a short fiscal year, from
October 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996.
(3) Represents the amount paid by the Company to Poly Ventures Associates,
L.P. for Dr. Harrison's services to the Company for the period from
October 1, 1995 to June 18, 1996. Dr. Harrison is a general partner of
Poly Ventures Associates, L.P.
(4) Represents (i) $58,117 in relocation expenses and (ii) $39,588 in payments
to Mr. Hora following the termination of his employment with the Company.
(5) Represents the amount paid by the Company for relocation expenses incurred
in connection with the commencement of Mr. Hora's employment with the
Company.
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL 1996
The following table sets forth information relating to the grant of stock
options by the Company during fiscal year 1996 to the Named Executive Officers
under the Company's Stock Incentive Plan. The Company did not grant any stock
appreciation rights ("SARs") in fiscal year 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Individual Grants
-------------------------------------------------------
% of Total Potential Realizable Value at
Number of Options Exercise Assumed Annual Rates of
Securities Granted to Price Per Stock Price Appreciation for
Underlying Employees in Share Expiration Option Term(1)
Name Options (#) Fiscal 1996 ($/sh) Date 5% 10%
---- ----------- ----------- ------ ---- -- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison.. 120,000(2) 14.2% 12.00 (3) 587,333 1,374,656
300,000(4) 42.6 14.50 (5) 1,479,416 3,356,290
Chester M. Lee........... 10,416(6) 1.5 12.00 (7) 42,509 96,439
100,000(8) 14.2 14.50 (9) 643,793 1,530,408
David A. Rossi........... 29,166(10) 4.1 12.00 (11) 155,394 369,398
John M. Lounge........... 25,000(12) 3.5% 14.50 (13) 160,948 382,602
</TABLE>
- ---------
(1) The indicated dollar amounts are the result of calculations based on the
exercise price of the options and assume five and ten percent appreciation
rates set by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, are
not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of the
Company's stock price.
(2) Represents 120,000 options which vest ratably over a three-year period
commencing on October 11, 1996.
(3) The options expire ratably over a three-year period commencing October 11,
2001.
(4) Represents 300,000 options which vested on the date of grant.
(5) The options expire on April 10, 2001.
34
<PAGE> 35
(6) Represents 10,416 options which vested on the date of grant.
(7) The options expire on December 21, 2000.
(8) Represents 100,000 options which vest ratably over a four-year period
commencing on April 10, 1997.
(9) The options expire ratably over a four-year period commencing on April 10,
2002.
(10)The options vest ratably over a four-year period commencing on December 21,
1996.
(11)The options expire ratably over a four-year period commencing on December
21, 2001.
(12)The options vest ratably over a four-year period commencing on April 10,
1997.
(13)The options expire ratably over a four-year period commencing on April 10,
2002.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL 1996 AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES
The following table sets forth the number of shares covered by stock
options held by the Named Executive Officers at June 30, 1996, and also shows
the value of "in-the-money" options (market price of the Company's stock less
the exercise price) at that date. Except as listed in the table, no other
Named Executive Officer exercised any Company stock options or beneficially
owned unexercised Company stock options.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options
Options at June 30, 1996 at June 30, 1996(1)
(#) ($)
--------------------------- ----------------------------
Name Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
----------------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison 300,000 120,000 0 0
Richard P. Hora . . . . 41,666 0 0 0
Chester M. Lee . . . . 10,416 100,000 0 0
David A. Rossi . . . . 24,997 66,665 0 0
John M. Lounge . . . . 45,831 33,333 0 0
Margaret E. Grayson . . 8,333 24,999 0 0
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) Based on the difference between the closing market price on June 28, 1996
for the Common Stock, which was $11.00 per share, and the option
exercise price. The above valuations may not reflect the actual value
of unexercised options as the value of unexercised options will
fluctuate with market activity.
35
<PAGE> 36
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
Dr. Harrison, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is a
member of the Compensation Committee.
Director Compensation
All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with their
attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and non-employee directors
receive a fee of $500 per day for each meeting of the Board of Directors they
attend. The Company also has a Directors' Stock Option Plan pursuant to which
each member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of the Company who
is elected or continues as a member of the Board of Directors is entitled to
receive annually options to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price equal to fair market value; provided, however, that no director
may receive under the Directors' Stock Option Plan options to purchase an
aggregate of more than 25,000 shares of Common Stock. The Company does not pay
any additional remuneration to officers of the Company for serving as
directors.
DIRECTORS' STOCK OPTION PLAN
In November 1995, the Company adopted a directors' stock option plan (the
"Directors' Plan"), pursuant to which each member of the Board of Directors who
is not an employee of the Company who is elected or continues as a member of
the Board of Directors is entitled to receive annually options to purchase
5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to fair market value;
provided, however, that no director may receive under the Directors' Plan
options to purchase an aggregate of more than 25,000 shares of Common Stock.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the Directors'
Plan, however, it cannot direct the number, timing or price of options granted
to eligible recipients thereunder.
Each option grant under the Directors' Plan vests after the first
anniversary of the date of grant and expires six years thereafter. The number
of shares of Common Stock related to awards that expire unexercised or are
forfeited, surrendered, terminated or cancelled are available for future awards
under the Directors' Plan. If a director's service on the Board of Directors
terminates for any reason other than death, all vested options may be
exercisable by such director until the earlier of his or her death or the
expiration date of the option grant. In the event of a director's death, any
options which such director was entitled to exercise on the date immediately
preceding his or her death may be exercised by a transferee of such director
for the six month period after the date of the director's death.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under
the Directors' Plan is 250,000 shares (subject to adjustment for certain events
such as stock splits and stock dividends). As of August 31, 1996, the Company
had not granted any options under the Directors' Plan. The first grants will
be made in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on October 22,
1996.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation of the Company's executives is subject to review and approval
by the Compensation Committee (the "Compensation Committee") of the Company's
Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee consists of two outside
directors James R. Thompson (Chairman) and Jeffrey Schuss, and the Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company (Dr. Shelley A. Harrison).
Compensation Philosophy.
In determining executive compensation policies, the Compensation Committee
has four primary objectives:
36
<PAGE> 37
(1) to attract, motivate and retain key executive talent;
(2) to balance the flexibility to reward individuals' skills with the need
to structure compensation for defined roles;
(3) to ensure that executive compensation is competitive with that of other
leading companies in related fields; and
(4) to provide incentives to achieve corporate objectives, thereby
contributing to the overall goal of enhancing stockholder value.
The Compensation Committee's compensation policies discussed below are
designed to achieve the foregoing objectives. The Compensation Committee
expects to continuously review and refine the Company's compensation practices
as necessary to respond to a changing business environment.
In order to evaluate and establish appropriate compensation practices, the
Company consults multiple sources of information. The Compensation Committee
uses data from benchmark companies within the aerospace or similar high
technology industries to assess the Company's performance and compensation
levels. Benchmark companies are selected according to, among other factors,
the comparability of their operations, product lines, revenues and markets
served. The Compensation Committee seeks to set its executive compensation
levels competitively with the benchmark companies, to the extent such targets
are consistent with the Compensation Committee's objectives. During fiscal
year 1996, the Company retained an independent compensation consultant to
evaluate its compensation practices, and, in particular, salary and bonus
levels. The Company utilized the recommendations of the compensation
consultant's report in setting incentive bonus levels at the end of fiscal year
1996.
Elements of Executive Compensation.
The Company's executive compensation program has three components: (1)
annual cash compensation in the form of base salary and incentive bonus
payments, (2) long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options
granted under the Company's Stock Incentive Plan and (3) other compensation and
employee benefits generally available to all employees of the Company, such as
health insurance. Annual cash compensation is primarily designed to reward
current performance. Long-term incentives and other compensation and employee
benefits are primarily designed to create performance incentives over the long
term for executive officers and employees.
Base Salary. The base salary for each executive officer is set at a
level deemed sufficient to attract and retain qualified executive officers.
The Compensation Committee has generally determined target base salaries
according to the average base salaries paid by benchmark high technology
companies. Aggregate base salary increases are intended to maintain
compensation levels that are in line with leading companies in related fields,
while individual base salary increases are set to reflect individual
performance levels. The base salaries of certain executive officers are
subject to minimums set forth in individual employment agreements.
Incentive Bonuses. Annual cash bonuses are designed to provide
incentives based on individual contribution to the achievement of the Company's
annual business goals. Bonus payments have generally been reflective of the
Company's performance in achieving revenues, profitability and other operating
and corporate objectives, as well as the scope of an executive officer's
responsibilities. The Compensation Committee makes a determination as to
incentive bonus payments at the end of each year based on a subjective
valuation of the contributions of individual executive officers to the
achievement of the Company's annual business goals. The award of annual
incentive bonuses is based on achieving corporate goals and the amount of
individual incentive bonus payments is determined by percentage ranges
established annually by the Compensation Committee.
Long-Term Incentives. The grant of stock options is the Company's
current method for providing long-term incentive compensation to its employees.
The Compensation Committee believes that the use of stock
37
<PAGE> 38
options attracts and retains qualified personnel for positions of substantial
responsibility and also serves to motivate its executive officers to promote
the success of the Company's business and maximize stockholder value.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer.
The Compensation Committee based the fiscal year 1996 Chief Executive
Officer ("CEO") compensation on the policies described above. During fiscal
1996, two individuals served, at separate times, in the position of CEO, as
described below:
Richard P. Hora served as CEO from October 1, 1995 until his resignation on
April 10, 1996. During fiscal 1996, Mr. Hora received total compensation of
$228,955. Mr. Hora's base salary for fiscal 1996 was determined pursuant to an
employment agreement entered into in December, 1995 between Mr. Hora and the
Company in connection with the Company's initial public offering of its Common
Stock. The Compensation Committee deemed that the level selected for Mr.
Hora's base salary plus any bonus/long-term incentive compensation was
consistent with the compensation paid by benchmark high technology companies,
the Company's overall performance, the successful completion of the Company's
initial public offering, and the achievement of individual performance
objectives as evaluated by the Compensation Committee. No specific weighting
was assigned to these factors when Mr. Hora's total compensation for fiscal
1996 was reviewed.
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison served as Chairman of the Company throughout the
fiscal year and assumed the additional position of CEO, effective April 10,
1996. During fiscal 1996, Dr. Harrison and an affiliated partnership received
a total of $169,348 for his services. Dr. Harrison's compensation level for
fiscal 1996 was deemed by the Compensation Committee to be appropriate given
Dr. Harrison's qualifications and contribution to meeting the Company's
objectives.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows corporate
deductibility for certain compensation paid in excess of $1 million to the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and to each of the four other most highly
paid executive officers of publicly-held companies. "Performance-based
compensation," as defined in Section 162(m), is not subject to the
deductibility limitation provided certain stockholder approval and other
requirements are met. The Company believes that the stock options granted in
fiscal 1996 and prior years satisfied the requirements of federal tax law and
thus compensation recognized in connection with such awards should be fully
deductible. It is the Company's intention to maximize the deductibility of
compensation paid to its officers, to the extent consistent with the best
interests of the Company. During fiscal 1996, the Company did not exceed the
$1 million deductibility cap with respect to any officer covered by Section
162(m).
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE,
James R. Thompson, Chairman
Jeffrey Schuss
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison
38
<PAGE> 39
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
On December 27, 1995, the Company entered into employment agreements (the
"Agreements") with each of Mr. Rossi, Mr. Lee and Ms. Grayson. The Agreements
provide that the officers will serve the Company in the respective offices
listed in the Summary Compensation Table for a term of three years, subject to
earlier termination as provided in the Agreements. The Agreements set forth
the minimum base salary of each officer during the term of the Agreements
($150,000 for Mr. Rossi; $125,000 for Mr. Lee; and $125,000 for Ms. Grayson),
subject to increase at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. Each officer is also eligible to receive, at the sole
discretion of the Compensation Committee, an annual performance-based bonus.
The officers are entitled to participate in the employee benefit plans of the
Company and are eligible for the grant of stock options, in the sole discretion
of the Compensation Committee, under the Company's Stock Incentive Plan. The
Agreements include provisions that are effective upon the termination of
employment of the officers under certain circumstances. In general, the
officers are entitled to continuation of base salary and medical coverage and
certain other benefits for six months following a termination of employment by
the Company other than for "cause" or a "material breach" (each as defined in
the Agreements).
The Agreements include certain restrictive covenants for the benefit of the
Company relating to non-disclosure by the officers of the Company's
confidential business information, the Company's right to inventions and
technical improvements of the officers, and noncompetition by the officers with
the Company's business for a period of six months following termination of
employment.
On December 27, 1995, the Company entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Hora (the "Hora Employment Agreement"), which provided that Mr. Hora would
serve the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer for a term of three
years, subject to earlier termination as provided in the Hora Employment
Agreement. The Hora Employment Agreement provided for a minimum base salary of
$190,000 annually, subject to increase at the sole discretion of the
Compensation Committee. Under the Hora Employment Agreement, Mr. Hora was also
eligible to receive an annual performance-based bonus at the sole discretion of
the Compensation Committee. The Hora Employment Agreement included provisions
effective upon termination of Mr. Hora's employment under certain
circumstances. In general, the Hora Employment Agreement provided for the
continuation of base salary and medical coverage and certain other benefits for
12 months following the termination of Mr. Hora's employment by the Company
other than for "cause" or a "material breach" (each as defined in the Hora
Employment Agreement).
The Hora Employment Agreement also included certain restrictive covenants
for the benefit of the Company relating to non-disclosure by Mr. Hora of the
Company's confidential business information, the Company's right to inventions
and technical improvements of Mr. Hora, and noncompetition by Mr. Hora with the
Company's business for a period of 12 months following termination of
employment.
In connection with Mr. Hora's resignation as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company on April 10, 1996, the Company agreed to continue Mr.
Hora's base salary and benefits for a period of 12 months.
39
<PAGE> 40
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the Company's cumulative total
stockholder return on its Common Stock since December 22, 1995, the date the
Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market (as measured by
dividing the difference between the Company's share price at the beginning and
the end of the measurement period by the share price at the beginning of the
measurement period) with (i) the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Stock
Market Index of U.S. Companies and (ii) the cumulative total return of the Dow
Jones Aerospace/Defense Index.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
[LINE GRAPH]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NASDAQ Dow Jones
Measurement Period Spacehab, Inc. U.S. Company Aerospace/Defense
Index Index
<S> <C> <C> <C>
12/22/95 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
06/30/96 $91.70 $113.80 $113.50
</TABLE>
- -----------------------
* Assumes that the value of an investment in the Company's Common Stock, the
Nasdaq Stock Market Index of U.S. Companies and the Dow Jones
Aerospace/Defense Index was $100 on December 22, 1995 and that all
dividends were reinvested.
40
<PAGE> 41
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The following table sets forth at June 30, 1996, certain information
regarding the beneficial ownership of Common Stock held by (i) each person
known by the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the
outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of the Company's directors and director
nominees, (iii) the Named Executive Officers and (iv) all directors and
executive officers of the Company as a group:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Beneficial Ownership
--------------------
Number Percent(1)
of Shares -------
---------
<S> <C> <C>
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS:
Zesiger Capital Group LLC . . . . . 1,083,257(2) 9.7%
SPACEHAB Taiwan, Inc. . . . . . . . 791,666(3) 7.2
Mitsubishi Corporation . . . . . . 639,581(4) 5.8
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS:
Dr. Shi H. Huang . . . . . . . . . 924,183(5) 8.3
Alvin L. Reeser . . . . . . . . . . 115,624(6) 1.0
Hironori Aihara . . . . . . . . . . 12,498(7) *
Robert A. Citron . . . . . . . . . 92,695(8) *
Dr. Edward E. David, Jr. . . . . . 12,498(9) *
Dr. Brad M. Meslin . . . . . . . . 45,857(10) *
Dr. Udo Pollvogt . . . . . . . . . 12,498(11) *
Jeffrey Schuss . . . . . . . . . . 21,663(12) *
James R. Thompson . . . . . . . . . 12,498(13) *
Prof. Ernesto Vallerani . . . . . . 12,499(14) *
DIRECTOR NOMINEE:
Gordon S. Macklin . . . . . . . . . -- --
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS:
Dr. Shelley A. Harrison . . . . . . 674,893(15) 5.8
Richard P. Hora** . . . . . . . . . 41,666(16) *
David A. Rossi . . . . . . . . . . 24,997(17) *
Chester M. Lee . . . . . . . . . . 68,345(18) *
Margaret E. Grayson . . . . . . . . 8,333(19) *
John M. Lounge . . . . . . . . . . 45,931(20) *
ALL DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
AS A GROUP (17 PERSONS) . . . . . 2,170,426 18.2
</TABLE>
* Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock.
** Mr. Hora resigned as Chief Executive Officer, President and as a director
effective April 10, 1996.
(1) Calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the "Exchange Act"). Under Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which
are subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges
exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of
calculating the number and percentage owned by such person, but not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each
other person listed. As of June 30, 1996, the Company had 11,069,237 shares
of Common Stock outstanding.
(2) Represents (i) immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 103,883 shares
of Common Stock and (ii) 979,374 shares of Common Stock held by Zesiger
Capital Group LLC ("ZCG") in discretionary accounts for the benefit of its
clients. ZCG disclaims beneficial ownership of all warrants and shares of
Common Stock held by it. Its address is 320 Park Avenue, New York, New
York 10022.
(3) Except for its ownership of shares of Common Stock, SPACEHAB Taiwan, Inc.
has no other affiliation with the Company. Its address is 14th Floor No.
180, Chang-Shiao E. Road, Sec. 4, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
41
<PAGE> 42
(4) Includes an aggregate of 614,582 shares of Common Stock and immediately
exercisable warrants to purchase 24,999 shares of Common Stock beneficially
owned by Mitsubishi Corporation and its affiliates. The address of
Mitsubishi Corporation is 3-1, Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo,
Japan.
(5) Includes: (i) immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock and 791,666 shares of Common Stock held by SPACEHAB Taiwan,
Inc., of which Dr. Huang is Chairman and shares voting and investment power
with respect to such shares of Common Stock and (ii) 120,019 shares of
Common Stock held by Chinfon Global Corp., of which Dr. Huang is the
Chairman of the Board and retains investment and voting power with respect
to such securities. Dr. Huang's address is c/o SPACEHAB Taiwan, Inc., 14th
Floor No. 180, Chang-Shiao E. Road, Sec. 4, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
(6) Represents the aggregate amount of immediately exercisable options to
purchase shares of Common Stock.
(7) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock. Excludes 614,582 shares of Common Stock and immediately
exercisable warrants to purchase 24,999 shares of Common Stock held by
Mitsubishi Corporation and its affiliates. Mr. Aihara is the Managing
Director of Information Systems and Services Group of Mitsubishi
Corporation. Mr. Aihara disclaims beneficial ownership of all warrants
and shares of Common Stock held by Mitsubishi Corporation and its
affiliates.
(8) Includes immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock.
(9) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock.
(10) Includes: 1,537 shares of Common Stock held in the CSP Associates, Inc.
("CSP") Profit Sharing Plan & Trust for the benefit of Dr. Meslin; (ii)
immediately exercisable options to purchase 8,332 shares of Common Stock
held by CSP for the benefit of Dr. Meslin; (iii) 8,487 shares of Common
Stock held by CSP, of which Dr. Meslin is the managing director; and (iv)
immediately exercisable options to purchase 4,166 shares of Common Stock.
Dr. Meslin disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares of Common Stock
held by CSP which are not held for his benefit.
(11) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock.
(12) Includes immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock and immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2,707 shares
of Common Stock.
(13) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock.
(14) Includes immediately exercisable options to purchase 12,498 shares of
Common Stock. Excludes an aggregate of 343,416 shares of Common Stock and
Company warrants held by Alenia Spazio, of which Prof. Vallerani serves as
President. Prof. Vallerani disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares
of Common Stock and all warrants held by Alenia Spazio.
(15) Includes: (i) immediately exercisable options to purchase 300,000 shares
of Common Stock; (ii) immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 190,686
shares of Common Stock held by Poly Ventures, of which Dr. Harrison is a
managing general partner and shares voting and investment power with
respect to shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Poly Ventures and
its affiliates; (iii) 26,918 shares of Common Stock and immediately
exercisable options held by Poly Ventures Associates, Inc. to purchase
74,998 shares of Common Stock; and (iv) 82,291 shares of Common Stock held
by Harrison Enterprises, Inc., of which Dr. Harrison is a director and
officer and retains sole voting and investment power with respect to such
shares.
(16) Represents the aggregate amount of immediately exercisable options to
purchase shares of Common Stock.
(17) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 24,997 shares of
Common Stock.
(18) Includes 2,987 shares of Common Stock held in the Chester M. Lee Revocable
Trust, of which Mr. Lee is the sole trustee, and immediately exercisable
warrants and options to purchase 778 and 64,580 shares of Common Stock,
respectively.
(19) Represents immediately exercisable options to purchase 8,333 shares of
Common Stock.
(20) Includes immediately exercisable options to purchase 45,831 shares of
Common Stock. The information required by this item will be contained in
the Company's definitive 1996 Proxy.
42
<PAGE> 43
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
On August 7, 1995, the Company and CSP Associates, Inc. ("CSP") entered
into a consulting agreement (the "CSP Consulting Agreement"), whereby CSP
agreed to render consulting services to the Company regarding the Company's
initial public offering and the operation and expansion of the Company's
business for an aggregate consulting fee of $99,000. The initial duration of
the CSP Consulting Agreement was from August 14, 1995 through February 14,
1996. As of February 21, 1996, the CSP Consulting Agreement was extended to
September 30, 1996 for an aggregate fee of $105,000. During the extended period
of the CSP Consulting Agreement, CSP is to focus its efforts on acquisition and
joint venture assistance and development. CSP shall be entitled to receive a
"success fee" under certain circumstances, in an amount to be determined. The
Company is also required to pay CSP for the actual and reasonable expenses
incurred by its personnel in connection with the rendering of services under
the CSP Consulting Agreement. Dr. Meslin, a director of the Company, is also
the Managing Director of CSP.
On August 14, 1996, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with
Gordon S. Macklin (the "Macklin Consulting Agreement"), whereby Mr. Macklin
agreed to render consulting services to the Company in connection with
potential strategic acquisition opportunities and investor relations support
for a monthly retainer fee of $2,000 and the one-time grant of immediately
exercisable options to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price per share of $8.75. The Macklin Consulting Agreement is for a one-year
term, commencing on August 14, 1996.
43
<PAGE> 44
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) The following documents are filed as part of the report:
1. Financial Statements.
The following financial statements of SPACEHAB, Incorporated and
related notes, together with the report thereon of KPMG Peat Marwick
LLP, the Company's independent auditors, are set forth herein as
indicated below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C>
Report of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, Independent Public Accountants......... 14
Balance Sheets.......................................................... 15
Statements of Income.................................................... 16
Statements of Stockholders' Equity...................................... 17
Statements of Cash Flows................................................ 18
Notes to Financial Statements........................................... 19
</TABLE>
2. Financial Statement Schedules.
All financial statement schedules required to be filed in Part IV,
Item 14 (a) have been omitted because they are not applicable, not
required or because the required information is included in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits.
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
3.1* Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company.
3.2* Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company.
10.1* NAS 9-18371, dated November 30, 1990, between the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA") and the
Registrant (including the amendments thereto) (the "CMAM
Contract").
10.2* Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract (Number SHB 1002), dated
July 11, 1990, between the Registrant and McDonnell Douglas
Corporation, McDonnell Douglas Aerospace-Huntsville Division
("McDonnell Douglas") (including the amendments thereto) (the
"CMAM I/O Contract").
10.3* Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract (Number SHB 1009), dated
November 23, 1994, between the Registrant and McDonnell
Douglas (including the amendments thereto) (the "Mir I/O
Contract").
10.4* Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract (Number SHB 1010), dated
November 23, 1994, between the Registrant and McDonnell
Douglas (including the amendments thereto) (the "Double
Module Contract").
44
<PAGE> 45
10.5* NAS 9-19250, dated July 14, 1995, between NASA and the Registrant
(including amendments thereto) (the "Mir Contract").
10.6* Amended and Restated Representation Agreement, dated August 15, 1995,
by and between the Registrant and Mitsubishi Corporation.
10.7* Letter Agreement dated August 15, 1995, by and between the Registrant
and Mitsubishi Corporation.
10.8* Exclusive European Broker Agreement, dated February 15, 1989, by and
between Intospace, GmbH and the Registrant.
10.9* Memorandum of Agreement, dated July 28, 1995, between the Registrant
and McDonnell Douglas Corporation.
10.10* Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement"), dated
December 29, 1993, among the Registrant, the Insurers listed therein,
McDonnell Douglas Corporation, the Chase Manhattan Bank (National
Association), as agent.
10.11* Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement, dated July 18, 1995.
10.12*** Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated August 20, 1996 among
the Registrant, the Insurers listed therein and the Chase Manhattan
Bank (National Association), as agent.
10.13* SPACEHAB, Incorporated Directors' Stock Option Plan.
10.14* SPACEHAB, Incorporated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan.
10.15* Office Building Lease Agreement, dated December 22, 1992, between
Gateway Associates Limited Partnership and the Registrant (Arlington,
Virginia headquarters lease).
10.16*** Office Building Lease Agreement, dated March 8, 1996 between The
Equitable Life Assurance Society of The United States and the
Registrant (Vienna, Virginia headquarters lease).
10.17* Agreement of Sublease, dated April 9, 1991 by and between Eastern
American Teak Corporation and the Registrant (land lease for Cape
Canaveral, Florida facility).
10.18* Amended and Restated Space Systems Development Agreement, dated June
24, 1994, between NASA and the Registrant (the "SSDA").
10.19* SSDA Termination Letter Agreement, dated July 13, 1995, between NASA
and the Registrant.
10.20* Letter Agreement, dated March 24, 1995, between Alenia Spazio and the
Registrant.
10.21* Consulting Agreement, dated August 7, 1995 by and between CSP
Associates, Inc. and the Registrant.
10.22*** Extension of Consulting Agreement between CSP Associates, Inc. and
the Registrant, dated February 21, 1996.
45
<PAGE> 46
10.23*** Consulting Agreement, dated August 14, 1996 by and between Gordon S.
Macklin and the Registrant.
10.24** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and Chester M. Lee.
10.25** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and David A. Rossi.
10.26** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and Nelda J. Wilbanks.
10.27** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and M. Dale Steffey.
10.28** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and Margaret E. Grayson.
10.29** Employment and Non-Interference Agreement, dated December 27, 1995,
between the Company and Richard P. Hora.
10.30** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Dr. Shelley A. Harrison.
10.31** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Dr. Edward E. David, Jr.
10.32** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Richard P. Hora.
10.33** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Robert A. Citron.
10.34** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Alvin L. Reeser.
10.35** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and James R. Thompson.
10.36** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Jeffrey Schuss.
10.37** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Dr. Brad M. Meslin.
10.38** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Chester M. Lee.
10.39** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and David A. Rossi.
10.40** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Dr. Shi H. Huang.
46
<PAGE> 47
10.41** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Nelda J. Wilbanks.
10.42** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and M. Dale Steffey.
10.43** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Margaret E. Grayson.
10.44** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Dr. Udo Pollvogt.
10.45** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Ernesto Vallerani.
10.46** Indemnification Agreement, dated December 27, 1995, between the
Company and Hironori Aihara.
11.*** For Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings, see Note 2 to the
Financial Statements.
12.*** Annual Report to Stockholders for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
1996.
21.*** Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.*** Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 33- 97812) and all amendments thereto, originally filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 1995.
** Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending December 31, 1995, filed February 14, 1996.
*** Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 17, 1996.
(b) The following reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Registrant
during the period covered by this report.
1. Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 1996, in order to
report the resignation of Richard P. Hora from the position
of President and Chief Executive Officer and the assumption
of the roles of Chief Executive Officer by Shelley A.
Harrison and President by Chester M. Lee.
2. Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 1996, in order to
report a change in the Registrant's fiscal year end from
September 30 to June 30.
47
<PAGE> 48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: December 17, 1996
By: /s/ MARGARET E. GRAYSON
-----------------------
Margaret E. Grayson, Vice
President of Finance, Treasurer
and Assistant Secretary (Principal
Accounting Officer and CFO)
48
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START> OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END> JUN-30-1996
<CASH> 50,795,548
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 5,445,765
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 56,425,973
<PP&E> 98,477,493
<DEPRECIATION> 27,987,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 129,708,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 10,483,615
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 79,862,700
<OTHER-SE> 16,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 129,708,615
<SALES> 56,397,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 56,397,000
<CGS> 20,985,147
<TOTAL-COSTS> 20,985,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 5,583,110
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 698,997
<INCOME-PRETAX> 31,740,638
<INCOME-TAX> 1,911,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 29,828,743
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 29,828,743
<EPS-PRIMARY> 3.21
<EPS-DILUTED> 3.21
</TABLE>
