<PAGE>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-27234
------------------------
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
CALIFORNIA 94-3007502
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
</TABLE>
6325 SAN IGNACIO AVENUE
SAN JOSE, CA 95119
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(408) 226-9900
(Issuer telephone number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
NONE
(Title of Class)
SECURITIES REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE PER SHARE
(Title of Class)
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. /X/
As of October 27, 2000, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held
by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last sale
price of such stock as of such date on the Nasdaq National Market, was
$347,419,685. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by
each person who owned 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been
excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination
of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive.
As of October 27, 2000, there were 11,821,255 shares of the registrant's
common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the issuer's definitive Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
--------
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business.................................................... 3
Item 2. Properties.................................................. 9
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................... 10
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders......... 10
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters....................................... 10
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data........................ 11
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition........................ 11
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk...................................................... 19
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................. 20
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure.................................. 40
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.......... 40
Item 11. Executive Compensation...................................... 42
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................ 42
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.............. 42
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K.................................................. 42
Signatures............................................................ 44
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors,
risks and uncertainties, including the risk factors set forth in this discussion
and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Generally, the words "anticipate", "expect",
"intend", "believe" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
The information included in this Form 10-K is as of the filing date with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and future events or circumstances could
differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included here.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
Photon Dynamics, Inc. ("the Company") is a leading provider of yield
management solutions to the flat panel display ("FPD") industry. The acquisition
of CR Technology, Inc. ("CR Technology") in November 1999 complemented our core
capabilities of data acquisition, image analysis and systems engineering. As a
result, we also offer yield management solutions for the printed circuit board
("PCB") assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industries. Our test,
repair and inspection systems are used by manufacturers to collect data, analyze
product quality and identify and repair product defects at critical steps in the
manufacturing process.
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND
Advancing technology and increasing demand for connectivity among electronic
devices have promoted the development and growing use of increasingly
sophisticated mobile electronic devices, such as notebook computers, cellular
phones, personal digital assistants and portable video games. Consequently,
manufacturers of mobile electronic devices are continually seeking ways to
increase the performance and quality as well as reduce the size, weight and
power requirements of the components incorporated into these devices such as
displays, electronic assemblies and semiconductors. For stationary devices,
including desktop computer monitors and televisions, consumers have increasingly
demanded higher resolution and performance as well as reduced footprint, power
consumption and heat emission. In response to these market demands, the desktop
monitor and television industries have increasingly adopted FPDs as an
alternative to traditional cathode ray tube ("CRT") technology.
As advanced electronics manufacturers ramp up production to meet increased
market demands, they are also seeking to improve the quality and reduce the cost
of their products by improving manufacturing yields and throughput. To do so,
they are increasing the use of more advanced test, repair and inspection
equipment and other yield management technologies.
THE FLAT PANEL DISPLAY INDUSTRY
Growth in the mobile electronic devices market has driven the demand for
FPDs, which offer many advantages over CRTs for mobile applications. FPDs offer
reduced size, weight, power consumption and heat emission and better picture
quality. In addition to their dominance of high performance portable
applications, FPDs offer similar advantages for stationary display applications
even though they are currently more expensive than CRTs with comparable viewing
areas. As a result, FPDs have emerged as the dominant display technology for
mobile electronic devices and have also made inroads into stationary display
markets such as the desktop monitor and television markets.
The highest performance FPD available today is the active matrix liquid
crystal display ("AMLCD") which produces full color images and operates at much
faster refresh rates than earlier passive monochrome LCDs. The color capability,
resolution, speed and picture quality of AMLCDs currently make
3
<PAGE>
these displays a preferred choice for high performance portable computer,
multimedia and other applications requiring the display of video and graphics.
THE AMLCD MANUFACTURING PROCESS
The manufacture of AMLCDs is an extremely complex process, which has been
developed and refined for different panel sizes and resolutions through research
and development, pre-production prototyping and commercial production.
Manufacturing an AMLCD involves a series of three principal phases. The first
phase is to fabricate an array of thin-film transistors on a glass substrate
through a process which is essentially the same as that used to create
electronic circuitry on a semiconductor device. In a high-quality color AMLCD,
each pixel, the smallest addressable dot on the display, is represented by three
transistors, one for each of the display's primary colors, red, green and blue.
The second phase, cell assembly, involves attaching a color filter to the
transistor-embedded substrate and injecting liquid crystal material between the
color filter and the transistor array. The color filter enables the display to
attain color capability by selectively filtering out the light emissions from
each multi-color pixel array to produce the desired color mix in the displayed
image. At the cell assembly phase, each individual pixel is created through the
combination of transistors and the color filter. The third phase in the process,
module assembly, involves packaging the display and attaching the electronics
that will allow the device to display the text, graphics and video images
directed by the computer or other electronic systems to the AMLCD. This step
also involves sealing the FPD and installing the electronics that connect the
FPD to other electronic devices such as a computer.
The ability of FPD manufacturers to improve yields of AMLCDs and other FPDs
depends, in large part, on their ability to test and inspect displays both
during and upon completion of the manufacturing process and to use test and
inspection data to refine the manufacturing process. Through test and
inspection, the FPD manufacturer seeks to identify defects at an early stage in
the process to permit repair or to avoid wasting costly materials on continued
manufacturing of a defective product. In addition, systematized test and
inspection provides qualitative feedback to the FPD manufacturer and enables it
to address yield problems and to optimize the manufacturing process.
PCB ASSEMBLY AND ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING INDUSTRY
Just as the growing demand for increasingly sophisticated mobile and
interconnected electronic devices is driving the market for new display
technologies, this demand has caused electronics manufacturers to seek to reduce
the size, power consumption and cost of the other components contained in these
devices. Additionally, as the functionality and sophistication of mobile
electronic devices have increased, so has the complexity of their electronic
components. These factors are driving the development of smaller, denser and
more complex PCBs, the backplanes upon which semiconductors and other electronic
components are attached and interconnected. These factors are also contributing
to the development of advanced semiconductor packaging technologies.
As semiconductors continue to shrink and become more complex, an increasing
number of wire connectors, or leads, must be attached to the semiconductor
package. Ball grid array ("BGA") semiconductor packaging technology was
developed to address the problems associated with greater lead counts required
for advanced semiconductors. Because the leads in BGA semiconductor packages are
located under the package and, therefore, are not visible after the package has
been affixed to a PCB, the inspection of these solder joints requires the use of
alternatives to visual inspection technologies such as X-ray inspection or
ultrasound technologies. Furthermore, as the number of leads on semiconductor
packages continues to increase, inspection technology must become more
sophisticated and precise.
At the same time, electronic device original equipment manufacturers are
increasing their focus on core competencies and outsourcing the manufacture of
many components incorporated into their products. This trend has resulted in the
rapid expansion of the contract manufacturing industry. Increased
4
<PAGE>
competition is causing contract manufacturers to focus on reducing costs while
differentiating themselves through improved quality. One way in which contract
manufacturers may reduce manufacturing costs is through yield improvements and
increased throughput, which may be achieved through increased and more
sophisticated inspection. Contract manufacturers are moving towards 100%
inspection standards and adopting new inspection technologies as they seek to
provide high quality products while reducing costs. Also, the contract
manufacturing industry is characterized by shorter product life cycles, a
greater variety of products manufactured in smaller lot sizes and high employee
turnover rate. These factors require contract manufacturers to adopt a flexible
approach to manufacturing with inspection equipment that is intuitive, easy to
use and easily configured.
FPD PRODUCTS
Our FPD yield management products include test, repair and inspection
equipment. Our test and inspection equipment identify and characterize defects
at early stages of the manufacturing process so that the panels may be repaired
before the next stage or, if necessary, discarded, minimizing the loss of time
and materials. Our test, repair and inspection systems use similar
software-based controls, processing and graphical user interfaces. Products can
be networked together so that defect data can be stored, analyzed and used
throughout the manufacturing process. Our highly reliable systems are also
compatible with a variety of material handling automation systems.
FPD ARRAY TEST EQUIPMENT. Our ArrayChecker test systems detect, locate,
quantify and characterize electrical, contamination and other defects in AMLCDs
after array fabrication. The systems use our proprietary non-contact Voltage
Imaging technology to provide a high-resolution voltage map of the entire
display and our proprietary image analysis software converts this voltage map
into complete pixel defect data. The ArrayChecker test systems determine whether
individual pixels or lines of pixels are functional and also find more subtle
defects such as variations in individual pixel voltage. These defect data files
are then used for repair and statistical process control. Our software driven
ArrayChecker test systems can be configured rapidly for testing different panel
sizes relative to traditional systems that require a different probe card for
each panel size.
Our next-generation ArrayChecker 2000 test system, which we began shipping
in the third quarter of fiscal 2000, is an enhanced version of our earlier array
test products with improved Voltage Imaging sensors, image processing software,
graphical user interface and materials transport features. These enhancements
substantially increase the throughput and reliability of our array test systems
to provide throughput rates that are similar to or higher than traditional probe
card based systems while accommodating the largest glass plate sizes currently
anticipated in the industry. At the same time, our ArrayChecker 2000 test system
provides substantially improved defect detection, while continuing to provide
the superior functionality, flexibility and cost-efficient features of our
earlier array test systems.
FPD REPAIR EQUIPMENT. Our ArraySaver repair systems utilize our proprietary
PixeLaser technology and BeamBlender multiple wavelength laser technology to
repair defects in FPDs during and after array fabrication. Our systems can use
defect data files downloaded from our array test systems or other test and
inspection systems to automatically position the panel for repair, thereby
eliminating the time spent by operators locating defects.
The ArraySaver system includes a high-precision stage and a user-friendly
graphical user interface allowing for high throughput and the capability to
repair all current panel sizes. Our fast high-precision stage fully automates
the precise positioning of the plate for each successive repair, thereby
substantially increasing throughput. Our graphical user interface and software
supports semi-automated setup of repair programs for common types of defects so
that repairs can be executed rapidly and accurately. These programs provide a
series of actions that the system automatically executes to repair the
particular defect type.
5
<PAGE>
FPD INSPECTION EQUIPMENT. Our PanelMaster inspection systems use our
proprietary MuraLook image analysis algorithms and N-Aliasing technology to
inspect FPD panels for visual defects after cell assembly and also during and
after module assembly. The system uses a high-resolution camera and a computer
workstation to quantitatively measure visual characteristics such as contrast,
luminance and color balance and to precisely locate and characterize line,
cluster, pixel and blemish defects. Inspection data generated by the system is
displayed on a video monitor for immediate interpretation and can be stored or
sent to a repair system to effect repairs. Our inspection system offers
different levels of resolution, functionality and flexibility to suit customers'
needs. The system is available either as a stand-alone unit or as a modular unit
that can be integrated with manufacturers' material handling equipment.
PCB ASSEMBLY AND ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING PRODUCTS
We also offer a broad line of X-ray and optical systems for non-destructive
inspection of PCB assemblies and advanced semiconductor packaging. Customers use
these systems to detect and identify defects on PCB assemblies and within
advanced semiconductor packaging. Both our X-ray and optical inspection product
lines are based on our proprietary image processing technology and are
integrated with a graphical user interface designed for ease of use on the
production line. Our user-friendly, flexible configuration interface is a
critical feature for many of our customers whose manufacturing operations must
cope with fast turnaround, short production runs and workforces with limited
skills and high turnover rates. These products use a common Windows-based
computing platform and can be networked together to provide factory and
enterprise wide access to product defect data. We offer fully automated systems
for use in high volume production lines and also offer lower cost systems for
use off the production line.
X-RAY INSPECTION EQUIPMENT. Our CRX X-ray inspection systems provide an
effective, non-destructive means of verifying hidden solder connections such as
under BGA packages. These systems also verify connections such as die
attachments and wire bonds inside semiconductor packaging. Customers use the
sharp, high magnification images provided by these CRX systems to analyze
failures that cannot be detected by optical means. We offer a variety of CRX
systems to meet customer requirements for handler size, resolution,
magnification, power, pricing and other factors. PCB assembly manufacturers use
our systems to inspect the hidden solder connections between PCBs and BGA
devices. Semiconductor manufacturers use our systems to inspect for features
within advanced semiconductor packaging including die attach, wire bond and flip
chip solder bump connections.
OPTICAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT. Our optical inspection systems inspect PCB
assemblies for defects either before or after the soldering step in the
manufacturing process. Many of the defects detected by our systems cannot be
detected electrically. Our systems inspect for component presence, correct
component, orientation, polarity, skew, solder integrity and other defects. Our
RTI product line features integrated cameras and lighting heads which pass over
the surface of the PCB, selecting different magnifications depending on the size
of the components. The RTI-6500 is an off-line system that inspects PCB sizes up
to 24 by 24 inches. The RTI-6520 is an in-line system with a built-in conveyer
to inspect PCB sizes up to 18 by 20 inches on the production conveyor line. Our
AOI-2020 system is a low-cost, table-top PCB inspection system for customers who
regard price as the most important criteria influencing their purchasing
decision.
COMBINED X-RAY AND AUTOMATED OPTICAL INSPECTION SYSTEMS. Our XRV combined
X-ray and automated optical inspection equipment reduces handling, speeds
throughput and saves floor space by simultaneously inspecting both visible and
hidden features of PCB assemblies.
CUSTOMERS
We sell our products to FPD manufacturers, semiconductor manufacturers, PCB
manufacturers and assemblers and other electronic product manufacturers. Most of
our FPD customers are located in Japan, Taiwan and Korea, where FPD production
is concentrated. The installed customer base for our FPD
6
<PAGE>
products includes eight out of the ten leading FPD manufacturers. The majority
of our PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging customers are located
in the U.S.
We derive most of our revenue from a small number of customers, and we
expect this to continue. During fiscal 2000, sales to four unaffiliated
customers, each of whom are customers of our FPD products, accounted for 24%,
14%, 12% and 12% of revenue, respectively. Sales of our FPD products represented
78% of revenue in fiscal 2000.
SALES AND SERVICE
We sell our products for the FPD industry directly to our customers in
Korea, through a sales representative in Taiwan, and through our value-added
reseller Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. ("IHI") in Japan. We
sell our products for the PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging
markets primarily through sales representatives. We service our products
worldwide directly, except in Japan, where IHI services our FPD products.
We generally sell our products on net-30 day terms, with a small portion
held back until final acceptance. However, the Company demonstrates that the
product meets its specifications and requires customer acceptance prior to
shipment. A substantial portion of our customers, primarily foreign, remit
payments on significantly longer terms. We typically provide a limited warranty
on our products for a period of one year. Our field service personnel provide
customers with repair and maintenance services, and customers may enter into
repair and maintenance service contracts covering our products. As of
September 30, 2000, we had 46 sales and service personnel, 25 of which are
located in the U.S. and 21 of which are located in Asia.
In the FPD market, our sales and marketing strategy is to provide our
customers with increased manufacturing yields and throughput, improved quality
and greater overall efficiency in their manufacturing process. In the PCB
assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industries, we focus on high-end
applications where our high-resolution, advanced image processing and optical
inspection technologies and products provide our customers with product quality
assurance capabilities. Our sales and marketing strategy is also to focus on the
rapidly expanding contract manufacturing industry. Operating on narrow margins,
contract manufacturers compete by reducing costs and improving quality, as well
as promoting their advanced capabilities. These customers require flexible
systems that are easy to set up and cost-efficient.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The FPD, PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industries are
characterized by rapid and continuous technological development and product
innovation. We believe that it is necessary to maintain our competitive position
through continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to
existing products. Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our personnel
and financial resources to research and development. Our research and
development expenses, consisting primarily of personnel, consultants and
prototype materials, were $11.8 million, or 14% of revenue, in fiscal 2000. We
also maintain close relationships with our customers, which helps us to remain
responsive to their product needs.
We are focusing our current research and development for the FPD market on
increasing the performance of our array test, repair and inspection systems and
expanding the application of our inspection systems for use in related markets.
Our current research and development for the PCB assembly and advanced
semiconductor packaging markets is focused on increasing the performance,
reliability and functionality of our inspection systems, expanding the
application of our inspection systems for use in related markets and developing
new X-ray and optical inspection products.
7
<PAGE>
MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLIERS
We manufacture our products for the FPD industry in San Jose, California and
our PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging products in Aliso Viejo,
California. Our manufacturing activities consist primarily of final assembly and
test of components and subassemblies, which are purchased from third party
vendors.
We schedule production based upon customer purchase orders and anticipated
orders during the planning cycle. We generally expect to be able to accept a
customer order, build the required machinery and ship to the customer within 16
weeks for our FPD products and within 8 weeks for our PCB assembly and advanced
semiconductor packaging products. Quality control is maintained through incoming
inspection of components, in-process inspection during equipment assembly and
final inspection and operation of all manufactured equipment prior to shipment.
We work in close collaboration with our customers and suppliers and train all of
our employees in quality assurance. Although we assemble some components and
final test our systems under limited clean room conditions, most of our
manufacturing occurs in standard manufacturing space.
Under the terms of our relationship with IHI, we have retained the exclusive
right to manufacture some critical components based on technology not shared
with IHI and to sell these components to IHI at prices that are mutually
established from time to time. IHI has the right to manufacture, assemble and
sell array test systems incorporating these components. To date, we have
manufactured all array test systems sold by IHI. Furthermore, IHI has sold
products only in its capacity as our value-added reseller in Japan.
Some of the parts included in our systems are obtained from a single source
or a limited group of suppliers. The partial or complete loss of such suppliers
could increase our costs, delay shipments and/or require redesigns of our
products.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We have 40 patents issued and 41 U.S. and foreign patents pending. None of
these patents is scheduled to expire before 2003, subject to payment of
applicable maintenance fees. In addition, PDI and IHI have jointly filed patent
applications in Japan relating to some aspects of the array test systems.
We frequently review our inventions and attempt to determine which
inventions will provide substantial differentiation between our products and
those of our competitors. In certain cases, we may also choose to keep an
invention or a process as a trade secret. Trade secrets are routinely employed
in our manufacturing processes. We have entered into non-disclosure agreements
to protect our proprietary technology with our employees and consultants and in
some instance with our suppliers, our customers and our value-added reseller.
The patent position of any manufacturer, including us, is subject to
uncertainties and may involve complex legal and factual issues. Claims allowed
by any existing or future patents issued to us may be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented, and any rights granted by those patents may not provide us with
adequate protection. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our
patents and other intellectual property rights or to defend against claims of
infringement or invalidity.
BACKLOG
Our backlog was $45.8 million as of September 30, 2000 compared to
$21.4 million as of September 30, 1999. Our backlog consists of orders for which
we have accepted purchase orders and assigned shipment dates within the next
twelve months.
All orders are subject to delay or cancellation with limited or no penalty
to the customer. Because of possible changes in product delivery schedules and
cancellation of product orders, among other factors, our backlog may vary
significantly and, at any particular date, is not necessarily indicative of
actual sales for any succeeding period.
8
<PAGE>
COMPETITION
The FPD equipment and the component inspection systems industries are highly
competitive. We face substantial competition from established companies, many of
which have greater financial, engineering and manufacturing resources and have
larger service organization and long-standing customer relationships with key
existing and potential customers. In addition, we expect our competitors to
continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to
introduce new products with competitive price and performance characteristics.
Our customers may choose to develop proprietary technology, which may obviate or
lessen their need to purchase our products. Moreover, competitive pressures may
necessitate price reductions, which could harm our results of operations.
In the FPD industry, our competitors include Micronics Japan Corporation and
Applied Komatsu Technology, Inc. in array testing; NTN Corporation, NEC
Corporation and Hoya Corporation in array repair; and several competitors in the
cell and module inspection market. In the X-ray inspection market, our
competitors include GenRad, Agilent Technologies, FeinFocus and Glenbrook
Technology. In the automated optical inspection market, our competitors include
GSI Lumonics, Agilent Technologies, Omron, Orbotech, Machine Vision Technology
and Machine Vision Products. In addition, some of our current and potential
competitors have been acquired by larger companies seeking to enter our markets.
We may face additional competition from new entrants into the FPD, PCB assembly
and advanced semiconductor packaging industries. In addition, we may face
increased competition if IHI elects to begin competing with us.
We believe that we can compete effectively with our competitors by building
on our substantial installed customer base, providing technologically superior,
competitively priced products and continuing to emphasize our easy-to-use user
interfaces and customer support. However, realizing and maintaining such
advantages will require a continued high level of investment by us in
engineering, research and development, marketing and customer service and
support. We may not have sufficient resources to continue to make such
investments. Even if sufficient funds are available, we may not be able to make
the technological advances necessary to maintain such competitive advantages.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 30, 2000, we employed 227 persons. No employees are
represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We
consider our relationships with our employees to be good.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters are located in San Jose, California and consist
of a 50,000 square foot facility for FPD manufacturing. We lease an additional
11,000 square feet in San Jose, California for sales and marketing and
administration. We lease 19,700 square feet in Aliso Viejo, California for PCB
assembly and advanced semiconductor inspection manufacturing. In addition, we
lease office space for our sales and service operations in Tokyo, Japan,
Hsinchu, Taiwan, and Seoul, Korea.
9
<PAGE>
The table below summarizes information concerning our properties at
September 30, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCATION TYPE PRINCIPAL USE
-------- ----------------------------- -----------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
San Jose, California......... Office, plant and warehouse Corporate Headquarters,
Research and Development,
Manufacturing, Sales and
Marketing, Service and
Administration
San Jose, California......... Office Sales and Marketing and
Administration
Aliso Viejo, California...... Office, plant and warehouse Research and Development,
Manufacturing, Sales and
Marketing, Service and
Administration
Tokyo, Japan................. Office Sales and Service
Hsinchu, Taiwan.............. Office Sales and Service
Seoul, Korea................. Office Sales and Service
</TABLE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not presently involved in any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the
quarter ended September 30, 2000.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
COMMON STOCK MARKET PRICE
Our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market on
November 15, 1995 under the symbol "PHTN." The closing price for our common
stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market on October 27, 2000 was $33.422
per share. As of October 27, 2000, there were approximately 107 shareholders of
record of our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low
sales prices of our common stock as traded on the Nasdaq National Market for the
periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 2000 QUARTER ENDED December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
High 43 1/4 94 3/8 78 3/8 87 15/16
Low 20 1/8 32 3/8 43 3/4 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 1999 QUARTER ENDED December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
High 5 5/8 8 1/4 12 3/8 25 3/4
Low 2 1/4 3 15/16 7 10 5/8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends to our shareholders. We do
not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future and intend to
retain any future earnings for reinvestment in our business.
10
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations," which are included elsewhere in this report. The
consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended September 30,
2000, 1999 and 1998 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30,
2000 and 1999 are derived from the consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this report. The consolidated statement of operations data for the
years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996 and the consolidated balance sheet data
as of September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996 are derived from audited consolidated
financial statements not included in this report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue $ 82,234 $45,431 $30,970 $30,215 $28,388
Income (loss) from operations $ 13,816(1) $ 2,775 $(1,403) $(2,264) $ 904
Net income (loss) $ 14,753(1) $ 2,273 $(1,207) $(1,882) $ 1,245
Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 1.35(1) $ 0.24 $ (0.14) $ (0.22) $ 0.15
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 1.23(1) $ 0.23 $ (0.14) $ (0.22) $ 0.14
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments $ 101,392 $ 8,026 $ 6,295 $ 5,401 $10,118
Working capital $ 122,633 $20,461 $16,993 $17,243 $19,219
Total assets $ 142,257 $32,067 $25,191 $27,325 $27,730
Shareholders' equity $ 126,555 $23,046 $19,568 $20,568 $21,982
</TABLE>
(1) Includes non-recurring acquisition charges of $860,000. Income from
operations, net income, basic and diluted earnings per share would have
been $14.7 million, $15.6 million, $1.43 and $1.31, respectively, excluding
these charges.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors,
risks and uncertainties, including the risk factors set forth in this discussion
and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Generally, the words "anticipate", "expect",
"intend", "believe" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.
The information included in this Form 10-K is as of the filing date with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and future events or circumstances could
differ significantly from the forward-looking statements included here.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Selected Consolidated Financial Data and the Consolidated Financial Statements
and related Notes thereto of the Company appearing elsewhere in this report.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading provider of yield management solutions to the FPD industry
and offer yield management solutions for the PCB assembly and advanced
semiconductor packaging industries. Our test, repair and inspection systems are
used by manufacturers to collect data, analyze product quality and identify and
repair product defects at critical steps in the manufacturing process.
11
<PAGE>
In November 1999, we acquired CR Technology, Inc. This strategic acquisition
complemented our core capabilities of data acquisition, image analysis and
systems engineering and enables us to broaden our product line to offer yield
management solutions to the PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging
markets. Prior to the acquisition, we derived revenue primarily from sales to
Japan, Taiwan and Korea where FPD production is concentrated. However, with the
acquisition of CR Technology, which derives the majority of its revenue in North
America, we have diversified our geographic mix. Sales outside North America
represented $64.7 million, $34.3 million and $22.1 million, or 79%, 76% and 72%
of revenue, in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
We continue to derive the majority of our revenue from a small number of
customers in the FPD industry. Our top four customers, each of whom are
customers of our FPD products, accounted for 62% of revenue in fiscal 2000.
Revenue from the FPD industry is obtained through direct sales in Korea, a sales
representative in Taiwan and a value-added reseller in Japan. Revenue from the
PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industry is obtained primarily
through sales representatives. Sales of our FPD products represented
$64.2 million, $31.6 million and $22.4 million, or 78%, 69% and 72% of revenue,
in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Sales of our PCB assembly and
advanced semiconductor packaging products represented $18.0 million,
$13.9 million and $8.6 million, or 22%, 31% and 28% of revenue, in fiscal 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively.
In September 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Image
Processing Systems, Inc. ("IPS"), a Canadian company, whereby a Canadian
subsidiary of the Company would acquire voting control of IPS in exchange for an
amount not to exceed 1.3 million shares of the Company's common stock. This
transaction, which is expected to close in the quarter ending December 31, 2000,
is intended to be accounted for as a pooling of interests. The transaction is
subject to the approval of shareholders of IPS as well as court and regulatory
approvals.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of
revenue of certain items in the Consolidated Statement of Operations of the
Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenue 52.7 56.3 57.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin 47.3 43.7 42.3
Operating expenses:
Research and development 14.3 13.1 21.1
Selling, general and administrative 15.1 24.5 26.8
Non-recurring acquisition charges 1.1 -- --
Asset recovery related to product line disposal -- -- (1.1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 30.5 37.6 46.8
Income (loss) from operations 16.8 6.1 (4.5)
Interest income and other, net 5.1 0.4 0.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes 21.9 6.5 (3.7)
Provision for income taxes 4.0 1.5 0.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) 17.9% 5.0% (3.9)%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
REVENUE. Revenue increased 81% to $82.2 million in fiscal 2000 from
$45.4 million in fiscal 1999. Revenue in fiscal 1999 increased 46% from
$31.0 million in fiscal 1998. Sales of FPD products represented $64.2 million,
$31.6 million and $22.4 million, or 78%, 69% and 72% of revenue, in fiscal 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively. This increase in revenue during the last two fiscal
years is primarily attributable to increased capital spending by FPD
manufacturers as a result of improved economic conditions in Asia. Sales of our
semiconductor inspection products represented $18.0 million, $13.9 million and
$8.6 million, or 22%, 31% and 28% of revenue, in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. This increase in revenue during the last two fiscal years is
attributable to increased sales of X-ray and optical inspection systems.
GROSS MARGIN. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue increased to 47% in
fiscal 2000 from 44% in fiscal 1999 and 42% in fiscal 1998. The increase in
gross margin is primarily attributable to increased capacity utilization
resulting from higher production volume. Gross margin from FPD products
increased to 48% in fiscal 2000 from 42% in fiscal 1999 and 1998. The increase
in gross margin from FPD products in fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998 was
partially offset by shipments to Taiwan with lower than typical gross margins.
Gross margin from semiconductor inspection products decreased to 44% in fiscal
2000 from 47% in fiscal 1999 and remained flat compared to 44% in fiscal 1998.
The decrease in gross margin from semiconductor inspection products in fiscal
2000 compared to fiscal 1999 was primarily due to competitive pricing pressures
on our X-ray inspection systems, and the increase in gross margin in fiscal 1999
compared to fiscal 1998 was primarily due to increased capacity utilization
resulting from higher production volume.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses were
$11.8 million, $5.9 million and $6.5 million, or 14%, 13% and 21% of revenue, in
fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase in research and
development expenses in fiscal 2000 compared to fiscal 1999 was primarily
attributable to our investment in personnel, consultants and prototype materials
for the development of our ArrayChecker-2000 Array Test and XRV Combo Inspection
Systems that were introduced in the last half of fiscal 2000. The decrease in
research and development expenses in fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998 was due
to the completion of major product enhancements to our ArrayChecker Array Test
System.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Selling, general and administrative
expenses were $12.4 million, $11.1 million and $8.3 million, or 15%, 25% and 27%
of revenue, in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2000 compared to fiscal
1999 was attributable to the establishment of a Taiwan sales and customer
support office, higher selling related expenses associated with increases in
orders and revenue and our investment in additional personnel to support our
expansion. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in
fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998 was primarily attributable to higher selling
related expenses associated with increases in orders and revenue in addition to
increases in business development expenses.
NON-RECURRING ACQUISITION AND OTHER CHARGES. In November 1999, we acquired
CR Technology, Inc. in exchange for approximately 1,835,000 shares of our common
stock accounted for as a pooling of interests. We incurred $860,000 in
professional fees consisting of legal, accounting and investment banking fees.
In December 1997, we received $350,000 related to the discontinuation of our
defect monitoring tool product in September 1996. We expensed the inventory and
assets associated with this product in fiscal 1996.
INTEREST INCOME AND OTHER, NET. Interest income and other, net consists
primarily of interest income and expense, foreign currency exchange gains and
losses, and other miscellaneous income and expense. Interest income and other,
net was $4.2 million, $171,000 and $269,000 in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The increase in interest income and other, net in fiscal 2000
compared to fiscal 1999 was primarily attributable to interest income earned on
higher cash and investment balances as a result of the net proceeds from a
public offering in February 2000. The decrease in interest income and other, net
in
13
<PAGE>
fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998 was the result of reduced interest income
earned on lower cash and investment balances.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2000 was 18%
compared to an effective tax rate of 23% for fiscal 1999. The effective tax rate
in both years is lower than the statutory rate due to the utilization of net
operating losses and credit carryforwards. The effective tax rate for fiscal
2000 is lower than the effective tax rate for fiscal 1999 due to the
proportionately larger utilization of loss and credit carryforwards.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have financed our growth primarily by a combination of cash flows from
operations, public stock offerings, lines of credit and loans. Working capital
was $122.6 million as of September 30, 2000 compared to $20.5 million as of
September 30, 1999. A major component of working capital is $101.4 million of
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments as of September 30, 2000
compared to $8.0 million as of September 30, 1999.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES. Cash provided by operating activities was
$10.3 million, $1.4 million and $1.5 million in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal
2000 compared to fiscal 1999 was primarily due to increased net income and
increases in accounts payable and other current liabilities offset by increases
in accounts receivable and inventories. The decrease in cash provided by
operating activities in fiscal 1999 compared to fiscal 1998 was primarily due to
increases in accounts payable and other current liabilities and decreases in
inventories offset by increases in accounts receivable.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES. Cash used in investing activities was $93.9 million,
$2.2 million and $675,000 in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998. The increase in cash
used in investing activities in fiscal 2000 primarily represented the investment
of funds received from our public offering in February 2000. Capital
expenditures were $2.5 million, $908,000 and $790,000 in fiscal 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively. The expenditures in fiscal 2000 were primarily for
computers, equipment and leasehold improvements to support our expansion. The
expenditures in fiscal 1999 and 1998 were related primarily to the purchase of
computers and equipment.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES. In February 2000, we completed a public offering of
2,000,000 shares of our common stock. We sold approximately 1,321,000 shares of
our common stock, and approximately 679,000 shares were sold by a shareholder of
the Company. Proceeds of approximately $68.0 million, net of issuance costs,
were received by the Company from the offering. In March 2000, we received
additional proceeds of approximately $15.6 million as a result of the
underwriters exercising their over-allotment option.
We have a borrowing capacity of $4.0 million available under a bank line of
credit secured by substantially all of our assets that expires in March 2001.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, CR Technology, has an unsecured borrowing capacity
of $1.5 million under a bank line of credit that expires in February 2001. Both
credit facilities bear interest at the bank's prime rate. At September 30, 2000,
no amounts were outstanding under the lines of credit, and we were in compliance
with all bank covenants.
We believe that existing liquid capital resources and funds generated from
operations combined with the ability, if necessary, to borrow funds will be
sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements and obligations for at
least the next twelve months. We believe that success in our industry requires
substantial capital in order to maintain the flexibility to take advantage of
opportunities as they may arise. We may, from time to time, invest in or acquire
complementary businesses, products or technologies and may seek additional
equity or debt financing to fund such activities. There can be no assurance that
such funding will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. The sale
of additional equity or convertible debt could result in dilution to our
shareholders.
14
<PAGE>
IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101, REVENUE RECOGNITION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ("SAB
101"). In October 2000, the SEC released frequently asked question and answer
("FAQ's") related to SAB 101. SAB 101 and the FAQ's provide guidance on the
recognition, presentation and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. The
Company is currently studying SAB 101 and the FAQ's and has not determined its
impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. In the
event that the implementation of SAB 101 requires the Company to report a change
in accounting principles related to its revenue recognition policy, the Company
would be required to report such change no later than the quarter ending
September 30, 2001. In addition to other risks related to SAB 101, it is
possible that SAB 101 will result in increased fluctuations in the Company's
quarterly operating results and increase the likelihood that the Company may
fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts for any period.
FACTORS AFFECTING OPERATING RESULTS
FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience significant
fluctuations in our quarterly results. Our backlog at the beginning of each
quarter does not necessarily determine actual sales for any succeeding period. A
substantial percentage of our revenue is derived from the sale of a small number
of FPD yield management systems ranging in price from $400,000 to $1.5 million.
Therefore, the timing of the sale of a single system could have a significant
impact on our quarterly results. Moreover, customers may cancel or reschedule
shipments, and production difficulties could delay shipments. Other factors
which may influence our operating results in a particular quarter include:
- the timing of the receipt of orders from major customers;
- product mix;
- competitive pricing pressures;
- continued or worsened financial markets or economic instability in Asia;
- the relative proportions of domestic and international sales;
- our ability to design, manufacture and introduce new products on a
cost-effective and timely basis;
- the delay between expenses to further develop marketing and service
capabilities;
- the realization of benefits from those improved capabilities; and
- the introduction of new products by our competitors.
CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
The FPD industry is extremely concentrated with a small number of
manufacturers producing the majority of the world's FPDs. Sales of FPD products
represented 78%, 69% and 72% of revenue, in fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. Samsung, LG Electronics, Unipac and Hyundai, each of whom are
customers of our FPD products, accounted for 62% of revenue in fiscal 2000. IHI,
Samsung, LG Electronics and Unipac, each of whom are customers of our FPD
products, accounted for 55% of revenue in fiscal 1999. IHI, Samsung and LG
Electronics, each of whom are customers of our FPD products, accounted for 65%
of revenue in fiscal 1998. If one or more of our major customers ceased or
significantly curtailed their purchases, our results of operations would be
harmed.
15
<PAGE>
FLAT PANEL DISPLAY INDUSTRY VOLATILITY
Our business depends in large part on capital expenditures by FPD
manufacturers, which in turn depend on the current and anticipated market demand
for FPDs and products that use FPDs. The FPD industry is highly cyclical and has
experienced periods of oversupply resulting in significantly reduced demand for
capital equipment. Most recently, the FPD industry experienced a downturn in
1998, which led many FPD manufacturers to delay or cancel capital expenditures.
There can be no assurance that the FPD industry will not experience further
downturns or slowdowns in the future, which may harm our business and operating
results. In addition, the need to invest in the engineering, research and
development and marketing required to penetrate targeted foreign markets and
maintain extensive service and support capabilities limits our ability to reduce
expenses during such downturns.
INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Sales to Japan, Taiwan and Korea accounted for 77% of revenue in fiscal 2000
and 70% of revenue in fiscal 1999 and 1998. We expect sales to these countries
to continue to represent a significant percentage of revenue. A number of
factors may adversely affect our international sales and operations, including:
- imposition of governmental controls;
- fluctuations in the U.S. dollar, which could increase the foreign sales
prices of our products in local currencies;
- export license requirements;
- restrictions on the export of technology;
- political instability;
- trade restrictions;
- changes in tariffs; and
- difficulties in staffing and managing international operations.
In 1998, many Asian countries experienced an economic recession that
resulted in a decline in the purchasing power of our Asian customers. A future
downturn in economic conditions in Asia could result in our customers failing to
place new orders for our products. There can be no assurance that such factors
will not adversely impact our operations in the future. In addition, the laws of
certain foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to
the same extent as U.S. laws.
KEY SUPPLIERS
We obtain certain of the components for our systems from a single source or
a limited group of suppliers. For example, we currently obtain materials
handling platforms, ultra high-resolution cameras and high-speed image
processing systems for our FPD products from single source suppliers. We also
currently obtain X-ray sources for our PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor
packaging products from limited source suppliers. Although we seek to reduce
dependence on our sole and limited source suppliers, alternative sources of
supply for these components may not be available or may be available on
unfavorable terms. The partial or complete loss of our sole and limited source
suppliers could at least temporarily harm our results of operations and damage
customer relationships. Further, a significant increase in the price of one or
more of these components could harm our results of operations.
16
<PAGE>
JAPANESE MARKET AND COMPETITION
We believe that competing Japanese companies in the FPD industry have a
competitive advantage in Japan because of the preference of some Japanese
customers for local equipment suppliers. Historically, foreign companies have
found it difficult to penetrate the Japanese market and often depend upon local
sales channels to sell their products in Japan.
Since June 1997, we have depended on IHI as our exclusive value-added
reseller to sell our FPD products in Japan. We anticipate that this relationship
will continue in the future. In fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, 7%, 18% and 33% of
our revenue came from sales to IHI, respectively. If IHI reduced the resources
allocated to the development, systems construction, customization, sale and
support of our FPD products in Japan, our business would be harmed.
In addition, IHI's rights to continue as our exclusive value-added reseller
in Japan are currently unresolved. IHI may have the right to market some or all
of our products in Japan on an exclusive basis, even as to us. If so, we may not
be able to compete effectively in Japan. Although IHI must purchase certain
critical components from us, IHI may manufacture competing array test systems
based on our technology. If this occurs, our business could be harmed.
We have granted IHI the non-exclusive right to manufacture and sell array
test systems based on our technology, excluding technology incorporated into
some critical components, in Korea, Taiwan and several other countries. Although
IHI has never manufactured these products, nor sold these products in countries
other than Japan, our business could be harmed if IHI manufactures and sells
array test systems in competition with our own in these countries.
COMPETITION
The FPD and PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industries are
highly competitive. We face substantial competition from established competitors
that have greater financial, engineering and manufacturing resources than us and
have larger service organizations and long-standing customer relationships. Our
competitors can be expected to continue to improve the design and performance of
their products and to introduce new products with competitive price/performance
characteristics. Competitive pressures may force price reductions that could
harm our results of operations. Our customers may also develop technology and
equipment which may reduce or eliminate their need to purchase our products.
Although we believe we have certain technological and other advantages over our
competitors, maintaining and capitalizing on these advantages will require us to
continue a high level of investment in engineering, research and development,
marketing and customer service support. There can be no assurance that we will
have sufficient resources to continue to make these investments or that we will
be able to make the technological advances necessary to maintain such
competitive advantages.
NEW PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES
We believe that our future success will depend in part upon our ability to
continue to enhance our existing products and to develop and manufacture new
products. For example, the size of FPD substrates and resolution of FPDs have
changed frequently and may continue to change requiring us to redesign or
reconfigure our FPD products. Similarly, as semiconductors, PCBs and
semiconductor packaging technologies have become more complex, our wholly owned
subsidiary, CR Technology, has been forced to continually redefine its product
offerings. In addition, a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from
sales of products based upon AMLCD technology. An industry shift away from AMLCD
technology to existing or new competing technologies could reduce the demand for
our products and harm our business.
As a result, we expect to continue to make a significant investment in
engineering, research and development. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful in the introduction, marketing and cost effective manufacture of any
of our new products; that we will be able to timely develop and introduce new
17
<PAGE>
products and enhance our existing products and processes to satisfy customer
needs or achieve market acceptance; or that the new markets for which we are
developing new products or expect to sell current products will develop
sufficiently. To develop new products successfully, we depend on close
relationships with our customers and the willingness of those customers to share
information with us. The failure to develop products and introduce them
successfully and in a timely manner could harm our competitive position and
results of operations.
KEY EMPLOYEES
Our future success depends in part on our ability to retain key personnel,
particularly senior management and engineers. We also need to attract additional
skilled personnel in all areas of our business to grow. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to retain our existing personnel or attract
additional qualified employees in the future. Other than Richard Amtower,
President of CR Technology, we generally do not have employment contracts with
our key employees and do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our
employees.
ACQUISITIONS
We may pursue acquisitions of complementary product lines, technologies or
businesses, such as the acquisition of CR Technology in November 1999.
Acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities,
incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and amortization expenses related
to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could harm our profitability. In
addition, current or future acquisitions involve numerous risks, including
difficulties in the assimilation of the operations, technologies and products of
the acquired company, the diversion of management's attention from other
business concerns, risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited
direct prior experience, and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired
company. There can be no assurance as to the effect of future acquisitions on
our business or operating results.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INFRINGEMENT
Our success depends in large part on our intellectual property. While we
attempt to protect our intellectual property through patents, copyrights and
trade secrets, there can be no assurance that we will successfully protect our
technology or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology
independently. No assurance can be given that the claims allowed on any patents
held by us will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. In addition, no
assurance can be given that any patents issued to us will not be challenged,
invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide
competitive advantages to us. Litigation may be necessary in the future to
enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade
secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Even if successful, litigation could be expensive and divert important
management resources. If our intellectual property were not properly protected,
our business could be harmed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS
Some of our PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging products are
subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the California
Department of Public Health and other agencies in each jurisdiction where these
products are sold or used. Compliance with these regulations is time-consuming
and expensive and may delay or even prevent sales in the U.S. or other
jurisdictions. If we fail to comply with these regulations, we could face fines
or penalties, and sales of our products could be prohibited. These fines,
penalties and prohibitions could harm our business.
We are also subject to federal, state and local regulations related to the
use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture and
disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used in
18
<PAGE>
our manufacturing process. Failure to comply with current or future regulations
could result in substantial fines being imposed on us, suspension of production,
alteration of our manufacturing processes or cessation of operations. New
environmental regulations could also require us to purchase expensive equipment
or incur other significant expenses to ensure compliance. Unanticipated
environmental compliance costs could harm our business.
COMMON STOCK PRICE VOLATILITY
The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in
response to variations in quarterly operating results and other factors, such
as:
- announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or by our
competitors;
- government regulations;
- developments in patent or other property rights; and
- developments in our relationships with our customers.
In addition, the stock market has in recent years experienced significant
price fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the
operating performance of the specific companies whose stock is traded. Broad
market fluctuations, general economic condition and specific conditions in the
FPD and PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging industries may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
The current foreign exchange exposure in all international operations is
deemed to be immaterial. We believe the impact of a 10% change in exchange rates
would not be material to our financial condition and results of operations.
Accordingly, we do not use derivative financial investments to hedge our current
foreign exchange exposure.
MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily
to our short-term investment portfolio. We do not have derivative financial
instruments in our portfolio. The following table presents principal amounts and
related weighted average interest rates by year of maturity for the Company's
short-term investment portfolio:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 Fair Value
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Short-term investments
Fixed rate securities $93,019 $93,003
Average interest rate 6.60%
</TABLE>
19
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DESCRIPTION PAGE
----------- --------
<S> <C>
Independent Auditor's Report................................ 21
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2000 and
September 30, 1999........................................ 23
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998......................... 24
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the
Years Ended September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998............. 25
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998......................... 26
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 27
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Photon Dynamics, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Photon Dynamics, Inc. as
of September 30, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 30, 2000. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a)(2). The consolidated
financial statements give retroactive effect to the merger of Photon
Dynamics, Inc. and CR Technology, Inc. on November 30, 1999, which has been
accounted for using the pooling of interests method as described in the notes to
the consolidated financial statements. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the management of Photon Dynamics, Inc. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did
not audit the financial statements of CR Technology, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998, which statements reflect total assets of $4.2 million
included in the related consolidated financial statement totals as of
September 30, 1998, and which reflect net income of $258,000 included in the
related 1998 consolidated financial statement totals for the year ended
September 30, 1998. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report
has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to 1998 data
included for CR Technology, Inc., is based solely on the report of the other
auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the report of
other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial position of Photon Dynamics, Inc. as of
September 30, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30,
2000, after giving retroactive effect to the merger of CR Technology, Inc., as
described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
San Jose, California
October 20, 2000
21
<PAGE>
REPORT OF CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
CR Technology, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of CR Technology, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended not
presented separately herein. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
CR Technology, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1998, and the results of
their consolidated operations and cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY
CORPORATION
Irvine, California
May 7, 1999 (except for Note 11, as to which the date is August 25, 1999)
22
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA) 2000 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,389 $ 6,421
Short-term investments 93,003 1,605
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,669 and $1,301
as of
September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively 22,478 13,630
Inventories 13,090 7,112
Other current assets 1,375 714
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 138,335 29,482
Property and equipment, net 2,568 1,817
Other assets 1,354 768
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $142,257 $ 32,067
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 5,289 $ 2,831
Other current liabilities 10,267 5,535
Deferred revenue 146 655
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 15,702 9,021
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding -- --
Common stock, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized,
11,819,741 and 9,648,571 shares issued and outstanding
as of September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively 134,728 45,972
Accumulated deficit (8,176) (22,929)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 3 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total shareholders' equity 126,555 23,046
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $142,257 $ 32,067
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
23
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue $82,234 $45,431 $30,970
Cost of revenue 43,336 25,573 17,879
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin 38,898 19,858 13,091
Operating expenses:
Research and development 11,774 5,943 6,523
Selling, general and administrative 12,448 11,140 8,321
Non-recurring acquisition charges 860 -- --
Asset recovery related to product line disposal -- -- (350)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 25,082 17,083 14,494
Income (loss) from operations 13,816 2,775 (1,403)
Interest income and other, net 4,175 171 269
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes 17,991 2,946 (1,134)
Provision for income taxes 3,238 673 73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $14,753 $ 2,273 $(1,207)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 1.35 $ 0.24 $ (0.14)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted $ 1.23 $ 0.23 $ (0.14)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares:
Basic 10,941 9,282 8,930
Diluted 11,958 9,935 8,930
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accumulated Notes
Common Stock Other Receivable
------------------- Accumulated Comprehensive from
(IN THOUSANDS) Shares Amount Deficit Income (Loss) Shareholders Totals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at September 30, 1997 8,841 $ 44,625 $(23,928) $ (14) $(115) $ 20,568
Components of comprehensive
loss:
Net loss -- -- (1,207) -- -- (1,207)
Currency translation
adjustments -- -- -- (183) -- (183)
--------
Total comprehensive loss (1,390)
--------
Net issuance of common stock 235 405 -- -- -- 405
Repurchase of common stock (46) (45) -- -- -- (45)
Repayment of notes receivable -- -- -- -- 30 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 1998 9,030 44,985 (25,135) (197) (85) 19,568
Components of comprehensive
income:
Net income -- -- 2,273 -- -- 2,273
Change in unrealized loss on
investments -- -- -- (2) -- (2)
Currency translation
adjustments -- -- -- 202 -- 202
--------
Total comprehensive income 2,473
--------
Net issuance of common stock 619 987 -- -- -- 987
Repayment of notes receivable -- -- -- -- 85 85
Pooling adjustment with CR
Technology, Inc. -- -- (67) -- -- (67)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 1999 9,649 45,972 (22,929) 3 -- 23,046
Components of comprehensive
income:
Net income -- -- 14,753 -- -- 14,753
Change in unrealized gain on
investments -- -- -- 13 -- (13)
Currency translation
adjustments -- -- -- (13) -- 13
--------
Total comprehensive income -- 14,753
--------
Net issuance of common stock 2,171 85,535 -- -- -- 85,535
Stock compensation expense -- 481 -- -- -- 481
Tax benefit from stock option
exercises -- 2,740 -- -- -- 2,740
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 2000 11,820 $134,728 $ (8,176) $ 3 $ -- $126,555
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 14,753 $ 2,273 $(1,207)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,249 1,093 1,378
Loss on disposal of equipment 14 -- --
Unrealized loss on short-term investments -- (2) --
Stock compensation expense 481 -- --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (8,848) (6,074) 3,910
Inventories (5,498) 1,399 (1,727)
Other current assets (661) (422) 243
Other assets (586) 69 14
Accounts payable 2,458 555 (1,573)
Other current liabilities 7,472 2,061 794
Deferred revenue (509) 423 (305)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 10,325 1,375 1,527
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment (2,494) (908) (790)
Purchase of short-term investments (261,930) (1,500) (25)
Redemption of short-term investments 170,519 177 140
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (93,905) (2,231) (675)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock, net 85,535 989 405
Proceeds from notes receivable to shareholders -- 85 30
Stock repurchases -- -- (45)
Payments under line of credit -- -- (50)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 85,535 1,074 340
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 13 202 (183)
Adjustment to conform to fiscal year of CR Technology, Inc. -- (116) --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,968 304 1,009
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 6,421 6,117 5,108
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 8,389 $ 6,421 $ 6,117
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Income taxes paid $ 525 $ 201 $ 84
Interest paid $ -- $ 20 $ 10
Supplemental non-cash financing activities disclosure:
Income tax benefit from employee stock plans................ $ 2,740 $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
DESCRIPTION OF THE OPERATIONS AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION. Photon
Dynamics, Inc. ("Photon Dynamics" or the "Company") is a leading provider of
yield management solutions to the flat panel display ("FPD") industry. The
Company also offers yield management solutions to the printed circuit board
("PCB") assembly and advanced semiconductor packaging (collectively,
"semiconductor inspection") industries. The consolidated financial statements
include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated.
MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts in the financial statements
and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates made by management include the calculation of allowance
for doubtful accounts and warranty and installation provisions.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK. Financial instruments, which potentially
subject the Company to credit risk, consist principally of short-term
investments and accounts receivable.
The Company invests excess cash in securities that the Company believes bear
minimal risk. These investments are of a short-term nature and include
investments in auction rate preferred securities, commercial paper and
government and corporate debt securities. The Company has not experienced any
losses to due institutional failure or bankruptcy.
A majority of the Company's principle customers are located in Asia,
primarily Japan, Taiwan and Korea. Therefore, the Company's sales to these
countries may be adversely affected by the overall health of these economies,
including the effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company
generally sells its products on net-30 day terms to its customers with a small
portion held back until final acceptance and generally does not require
collateral for its trade accounts receivable. The Company believes its credit
evaluation and monitoring mitigates this credit risk.
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS. Cash equivalents consist of
highly liquid investments with insignificant interest rate risk and have
original maturity dates of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
Short-term investments include marketable securities with maturities less than
one year from the date of acquisition. The Company has classified all securities
as available-for-sale as of the balance sheet dates. Investments classified as
available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses
excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of comprehensive
income (loss) until realized.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. The amounts reported as short-term
investments reasonably estimate fair value. The fair value of the Company's
cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current
liabilities approximates the carrying amount due to the relatively short
maturity of these items.
INVENTORIES. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in,
first-out basis) or market.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. Property and equipment are recorded at cost.
Depreciation of property and equipment is principally based on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which ranges from three to
five years. The shorter of the life of the lease or the useful life is used for
the amortization of equipment capitalized under lease obligations.
27
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
REVENUE RECOGNITION. The Company generally recognizes revenue from product
sales when the product is shipped. The Company demonstrates that the product
meets its specifications and requires customer acceptance prior to shipment. The
Company typically provides a limited warranty on its products for a period of
one year. A provision for the estimated costs of fulfilling warranty and
installation obligations is recorded at the time the related revenue is
recognized. Service contract revenues are deferred and recognized ratably over
the period of the related contract.
ADVERTISING. Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expense was $93,000, $122,000 and $81,000 for fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
INCOME TAXES. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES ("FAS 109"), which requires the
use of the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under FAS 109,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured based on differences between
the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted
tax rates and laws that will be in effect when differences are expected to
reverse.
FOREIGN CURRENCY. The functional currencies of the Company's foreign
subsidiaries are their respective local currencies. Accordingly, all assets and
liabilities of the foreign operations are translated to U.S. dollars at current
period end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated to U.S.
dollars using weighted average exchange rates in effect during the period. The
gains and losses from foreign currency translation of these subsidiaries'
financial statements are recorded directly into a separate component of
shareholders' equity. Currency transaction gains and losses have been included
in the Company's results of operations.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS. In accordance with the provisions of FASB
Statement No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION ("FAS 123"), the
Company accounts for its stock option and employee stock purchase plans in
accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK
ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES. The Company provides additional pro forma disclosures as
required by FAS 123. (see Note 7)
EARNINGS PER SHARE. The Company computes its earnings per share under the
provisions of FASB Statement No. 128, EARNINGS PER SHARE. Basic earnings per
share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner and also
gives effect to all dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the
period. Common equivalent shares consist of stock options issued to employees
under employee stock option plans and of warrants. (see Note 10)
SEGMENT INFORMATION. As of October 1998, the Company adopted FASB Statement
No. 131, DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION
("FAS 131"). The new rules establish revised standards for the reporting of
financial and descriptive information about operating segments in financial
statements. The adoption of FAS 131 did not have a material effect on the
Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position. (see
Note 9)
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS. In June 1998, the FASB issued Statement
No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
("FAS 133"). FAS 133, as amended, establishes methods for recording derivative
financial instruments and hedging activities related to those instruments, as
well as other hedging activities. The Company is required to adopt FAS 133
effective October 1, 2000. Because the
28
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Company currently does not hold any derivative instruments and does not engage
in hedging activities, the Company does not currently believe that the adoption
of FAS 133, as amended, will have a significant impact on its consolidated
financial position or results of operations
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, REVENUE RECOGNITION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
("SAB 101"). In October 2000, the SEC released the frequently asked question and
answer ("FAQ's") related to SAB 101. SAB 101 and the FAQ's summarize certain
views of the SEC in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue
recognition in financial statements. Changes in the Company's revenue
recognition policy resulting from the interpretation of SAB 101 would be
reported as a change in accounting principle no later than the quarter ending
September 30, 2001. The change in the revenue recognition policy would result in
a cumulative adjustment to reflect the deferral of revenue for shipments
previously reported as revenue that do not meet SAB 101 revenue recognition
guidance. Although the Company believes its revenue recognition policy is in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company is
currently studying SAB 101 and the FAQ's and has not determined its impact on
the Company's financial statements.
NOTE 2--BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Inventories:
Raw materials $ 7,203 $ 3,769
Work-in-process 5,789 2,686
Finished goods 98 657
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $13,090 $ 7,112
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property and equipment:
Equipment $ 7,211 $ 5,853
Office furniture and fixtures 583 417
Leasehold improvements 932 545
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8,726 6,815
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (6,158) (4,998)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 2,568 $ 1,817
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other current liabilities:
Warranty $ 3,420 $ 1,640
Compensation 2,910 1,518
Commissions 1,354 968
Income taxes 284 305
Other accrued expenses 2,299 1,104
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $10,267 $ 5,535
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3--NON-RECURRING ACQUISITION AND OTHER CHARGES
ACQUISITIONS. In November 1999, the Company acquired CR Technology, Inc.
("CR Technology") in exchange for approximately 1,835,000 shares of its common
stock with the acquisition accounted for as a pooling of interests. CR
Technology shareholders received 1.203343 shares of Photon Dynamics' common
stock for each share of CR Technology common stock. In addition, all outstanding
CR Technology stock options under the 1983 and 1991 stock option plans ("CR
Technology Plans") were converted at the common stock exchange ratio into
options to purchase Photon Dynamics' common stock. The Company incurred $860,000
in professional fees consisting of legal, accounting and investment banking
fees.
The consolidated financial statements for the years ended September 30, 1999
and 1998 have been retroactively restated to include the financial position,
results of operations and cash flows of CR Technology. Financial information for
Photon Dynamics' fiscal years ended September 30, 1999 and 1998 have been
combined with CR Technology's financial information for the twelve months ended
September 30, 1999 and the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, respectively.
Therefore, CR Technology's results of operations for the three months ended
December 31, 1998 have been included in both years. The unaudited results of
operations of CR Technology are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(IN THOUSANDS) 1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C>
Revenue $2,423
Operating income $ 9
Net income $ 67
</TABLE>
Certain consolidated financial results prior to the acquisition are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 1999 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Photon Dynamics $31,562 $22,420
CR Technology 13,869 8,550
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated revenue $45,431 $30,970
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss):
Photon Dynamics $ 1,170 $(1,465)
CR Technology 1,103 258
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated net income (loss) $ 2,273 $(1,207)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
OTHER CHARGES. In December 1997, the Company received $350,000 related to
the discontinuation of its defect monitoring tool product in September 1996. The
Company had expensed the inventory and assets associated with this product in
fiscal 1996.
30
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 4--LINE OF CREDIT
In March 2000, the Company entered into a $4.0 million bank line of credit,
which expires March 25, 2001 and bears interest at the bank's prime rate (9.50%
at September 30, 2000). The line of credit is secured by substantially all of
the Company's assets and contains certain financial and other covenants. The
Company is eligible to borrow against a portion of accounts receivable. The
Company was in compliance with all covenants as of September 30, 2000. There
were no amounts outstanding under this agreement as of September 30, 2000.
The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, CR Technology, has a $1.5 million
revolving bank line of credit, which expires February 2001 and bears interest at
the bank's prime rate (9.50% at September 30, 2000). The line of credit is
secured by substantially all of CR Technology's assets and contains certain
financial and other covenants. CR Technology is eligible to borrow on an
unsecured basis. CR Technology was in compliance with all covenants as of
September 30, 2000. There were no amounts outstanding under this agreement as of
September 30, 2000.
NOTE 5--SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available-for-sale
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
(IN THOUSANDS) Cost Gains Losses Value
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
September 30, 2000
Government securities $ 7,520 -- -- $ 7,520
Auction rate preferred securities 58,830 -- -- 58,830
Commercial paper and corporate debt
securities 26,669 -- (16) 26,653
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Included in short-term investments $93,019 $ -- $(16) $93,003
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 30, 1999
Government securities $ 26 -- -- $ 26
Auction rate preferred securities 1,500 -- -- 1,500
Commercial paper and corporate debt
securities 79 -- -- 79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Included in short-term investments $ 1,605 $ -- $ -- $ 1,605
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6--INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $3,199 $111 $ 7
State 2 151 118
Foreign 37 71 108
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,238 333 233
Deferred:
Federal -- 340 (160)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for income taxes $3,238 $673 $ 73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Actual current liabilities are lower than reflected above by $2.7 million
for fiscal 2000 due to employee stock option-related tax benefits which were
credited to shareholders' equity.
The significant components of deferred income tax assets are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ 1,066 $ 4,150
Research credit carryforwards 2,549 1,800
Inventory writedowns 1,591 980
Depreciation 455 462
Capitalized research costs 432 419
Bad debt reserve 1,583 453
Expenses not currently deductible 1,851 1,403
Other individually immaterial items 3 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9,530 9,670
Deferred tax assets valuation allowance (9,530) (9,670)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total net deferred tax assets $ -- $ --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The valuation allowance decreased by $140,000 and $542,000 in fiscal 2000
and 1999, respectively. As of September 30, 2000, $5.1 million of the valuation
allowance is related to the benefits of stock option deductions which will be
credited to shareholders' equity when realized.
The net operating loss and credit carryforwards disclosed above will expire
at various times beginning in 2007, if not utilized. Under certain provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the availability of the Company's
net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to limitation if
it should be determined that there has been a change in ownership of more that
50% of the value of the Company's stock. Such determination could limit the
utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
32
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6--INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the
Company's effective income tax rate is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected provision (benefit) at federal statutory rate $ 6,297 $1,002 $(385)
Alternative minimum taxes -- 66 28
State income taxes 2 151 117
Losses (benefited)/not benefited (2,924) (546) 313
Other (137) -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 3,238 $ 673 $ 73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Deferred tax assets reflect net operating loss and credit carryforwards and
the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for
income tax purposes.
NOTE 7--SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
COMMON STOCK. In February 2000, the Company completed a public offering of
2,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $55.00 per share.
Approximately 1,321,000 shares were sold by the Company and approximately
679,000 shares were sold by a shareholder of the Company. Proceeds of
approximately $68.0 million, net of issuance costs, were received from the
offering. In March 2000, the Company received additional proceeds of
approximately $15.6 million from the sale of an additional 300,000 shares of its
common stock as a result of the underwriters exercising their over-allotment
option.
WARRANTS. In June 2000, all outstanding warrants expired. No warrants have
been issued subsequent to June 2000.
NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM SHAREHOLDERS. Notes bearing interest at 6.83% per
annum were issued to certain employees exercising their stock options as well as
advances to purchase shares on the open market. The notes are secured by the
shares purchased. At September 30, 1999, all notes from shareholders had been
collected.
STOCK OPTION PLANS. Under the Company's 1987 and 1995 stock option plans
and the CR Technology Plans (collectively, the "Option Plans"), the Board of
Directors may, at its discretion, grant incentive or non-qualified stock options
to employees, officers, directors and consultants at prices no less than 100% of
the fair market value of shares at the date of grant. The plan also permits the
grant of stock bonus awards to qualified individuals. Options generally become
exercisable in 50 equal installments commencing 6 months from the date of grant
and expire ten years after the options are granted.
On November 27, 1998, employees of the Company, excluding members of the
Board of Directors, holding options with exercise prices of $5.00 or higher were
granted the opportunity to surrender those options and replace them with new
options having an exercise price of $4.50, the closing market price of the
Company's common stock on that date, and begin a new vesting schedule from the
date of grant. A total of 431,833 options were surrendered in exchange for
353,464 new options.
33
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 7--SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
In connection with the Company's acquisition of CR Technology in
November 1999, 104,500 options granted under CR Technology's option plans were
converted into 125,742 options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock
at an average converted exercise price of $0.26. The options are exercisable in
four equal annual installments commencing one year from the date of grant and
expire ten years from the original date of grant.
The activity under the option plans, combined, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted-
Available Average
For Options Exercise
Grant Outstanding Price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at September 30, 1997 300,479 1,252,174 $ 4.28
Additional shares reserved 300,000 -- --
Options granted (429,513) 429,513 3.76
Options canceled/expired 233,379 (276,200) 5.43
Options exercised -- (131,639) 1.05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 1998 404,345 1,273,848 4.19
Additional shares reserved 230,000 -- --
Options granted (772,680) 772,680 5.75
Options canceled/expired 530,999 (548,951) 6.59
Options exercised -- (299,825) 2.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 1999 392,664 1,197,752 4.62
Additional shares reserved 350,000 -- --
Options granted (567,039) 567,039 38.65
Options canceled/expired 79,633 (78,833) 19.71
Options exercised -- (448,622) 3.25
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balances at September 30, 2000 255,258 1,237,336 $19.73
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
34
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 7--SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
(including CR Technology on an equivalent basis) as of September 30, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Vested and Exercisable
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Weighted-
Average
Number Remaining Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Range of of Shares Contract Exercise Number Exercise
Exercise Outstanding at Life Price at Vested and Price at
Prices September 30, 2000 (in years) September 30, 2000 Exercisable September 30, 2000
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 0.17 - $ 4.13 232,180 6.96 $ 3.08 110,448 $ 2.56
$ 4.50 - $ 4.50 243,134 8.16 $ 4.50 206,804 $ 4.50
$ 4.63 - $10.63 154,371 8.21 $ 7.13 59,421 $ 7.24
$11.00 - $22.06 179,782 8.92 $18.44 44,511 $17.76
$33.38 - $33.38 156,455 9.21 $33.38 27,760 $33.38
$35.88 - $46.38 59,610 9.59 $42.81 12,171 $38.14
$47.31 - $47.31 178,154 9.54 $47.31 19,849 $47.31
$59.00 - $59.00 33,650 9.74 $59.00 -- $ --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 0.17 - $59.00 1,237,336 8.49 $19.73 480,964 $ 9.90
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The weighted average fair value of options granted in fiscal 2000, 1999 and
1998 was $22.62, $2.66 and $1.99, respectively. Options exercisable were
480,964, 530,883 and 625,551 as of September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
EMPLOYEE PURCHASE PLAN. The Company's employee stock purchase plan provides
that eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of their base earnings, through
accumulated payroll deductions, toward the semi-annual purchase of the Company's
common stock. Participants purchase shares on the last day of each offering
period. In general, the price at which shares are purchased is equal to 85% of
the lower of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the first day
of the two-year offering period or the purchase date. Compensation expense of
$481,000 was recorded in fiscal 2000 in connection with the plan. In fiscal
2000, 1999 and 1998, employees purchased 93,939, 120,445 and 102,343 shares,
respectively. At September 30, 2000, 218,233 shares were reserved and available
for issuance under the plan. The weighted-average fair value of shares issued in
fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998 is $3.57, $1.86 and $1.59, respectively.
PRO FORMA NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE. Pro forma information
regarding net income and earnings per share is required by FAS 123 and has been
determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock purchase plan
and employee stock options granted subsequent to September 30, 1995 under the
fair value method of FAS 123. The fair value of each option grant is estimated
on the date of
35
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 7--SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the multiple option
approach with the following weighted-average assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Stock option plan:
Expected stock price volatility 0.94 0.80 0.80
Risk free interest rate 6.15% 4.73% 5.54%
Expected life of options (years) 3 2 3
Stock purchase plan:
Expected stock price volatility 0.81 0.80 0.79
Risk free interest rate 5.36% 5.31% 5.30%
Expected life of options (years) 2 2 1.5
</TABLE>
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock option and employee stock purchase plans
have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of such Company
options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures required by FAS 123, the estimated
fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting
periods. The Company's pro forma information for the years ended September 30,
2000, 1999 and 1998 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma net income (loss) $10,348 $1,228 $(1,833)
Pro forma earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.95 $ 0.13 $ (0.21)
Diluted $ 0.87 $ 0.12 $ (0.21)
</TABLE>
The pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share for fiscal 2000,
1999 and 1998 is not representative of the pro forma effect on net income in
future years because it does not take into consideration pro forma compensation
expense related to grants made prior to fiscal 1996.
OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLANS. The Company has a retirement savings plan
that qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Beginning in fiscal 2000, the Company matched 50% on the
first 7% up to $3,500 per year of an eligible employee's contribution. The total
charge to operations under the 401(k) program was $245,000 in fiscal 2000.
36
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 8--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases its San Jose, California and Aliso Viejo, California
facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times
through fiscal 2004, with renewal options at fair market value for an additional
five-year period. The Company also leases equipment under operating leases.
Total rent expense under all operating leases was $971,000, $910,000 and
$895,000 for the years ended September 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Future minimum lease commitments under operating leases at September 30,
2000 are $1,392,000, $779,000, $744,000, $356,000, and $5,000 in fiscal 2001
through 2005, respectively.
NOTE 9--SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in two reportable segments consisting of the design,
manufacture and sale of yield management solutions to the FPD and semiconductor
inspection industries. Management has determined operating segments based upon
how each business unit is managed and operated. The Company sells its products
for the FPD industry directly to customers in Korea, through a sales
representative in Taiwan and through a value-added reseller in Japan. The
Company sells its products for the semiconductor inspection industry primarily
through sales representatives.
The Company's operating segments consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue to external customers:
FPD products $ 64,221 $31,562 $22,420
Semiconductor inspection products 18,013 13,869 8,550
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 82,234 $45,431 $30,970
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from operations:
FPD products $ 11,994 $ 1,180 $(1,589)
Semiconductor inspection products 1,822 1,595 186
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $ 13,816 $ 2,775 $(1,403)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identifiable assets:
FPD products $132,559 $25,288 $21,033
Semiconductor inspection products 9,698 6,779 4,158
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $142,257 $32,067 $25,191
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The Company's principal customers are primarily Asian-based FPD
manufacturers and North American-based PCB assembly and advanced semiconductor
packaging manufacturers. During fiscal 2000, sales to four unaffiliated
customers, each of whom are customers of our FPD products, accounted for 24%,
14%, 12% and 12% of revenue, respectively. During fiscal 1999, sales to three
unaffiliated and one affiliated customer, each of whom are customers of our FPD
products, accounted for 18%, 16%, 10% and 11% of revenue, respectively. During
fiscal 1998, sales to two unaffiliated and one affiliated customer, each of whom
are customers of our FPD products, accounted for 33%, 12% and 20% of revenue,
respectively.
37
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 9--SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
There are no significant inter-segment sales or transfers. Substantially all
of the Company's long-lived assets are located in the U.S. The following is a
summary of operations by geographic area:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Asia $63,569 $33,313 $21,710
North America 17,488 11,116 8,825
Other 1,177 1,002 435
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $82,234 $45,431 $30,970
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Sales outside North America accounted for 79%, 76% and 72% of revenue in
fiscal 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
NOTE 10--EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings
(loss) per share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Numerator:
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted earnings per
share: $14,753 $2,273 $(1,207)
Denominator:
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share 10,941 9,282 8,930
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options 1,010 592 --
Warrants 7 61 --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share 11,958 9,935 8,930(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic earnings (loss) per share $ 1.35 $ 0.24 $ (0.14)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ 1.23 $ 0.23 $ (0.14)
</TABLE>
(1) The effect of dilutive securities of 468,000 shares from employee stock
options and warrants was not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share as the effect is antidilutive.
NOTE 11--RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During fiscal 1998, the Company sold $6.2 million of its systems to LG
Electronics, Inc. ("LG"), and accounts receivable as of September 30, 1998
included $1.1 million of receivable from LG. During fiscal 1999, the Company
sold $4.9 million of its systems to LG, and accounts receivable as of
September 30, 1999 included $298,000 of receivable from LG. At September 30,
1998, LG owned approximately 8% of the Company's common stock and warrants to
purchase 28,333 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of
$0.60 per share and also held a seat on the Board of Directors. At
September 30, 2000 and 1999, LG owned less than 1% of the Company's common stock
and is no longer represented on the Board of Directors.
38
<PAGE>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 12--PENDING BUSINESS COMBINATION
In September 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with Image
Processing Systems, Inc. ("IPS"), a Canadian company, whereby a Canadian
subsidiary of the Company would acquire voting control of IPS in exchange for an
amount not to exceed 1.3 million shares of the Company's common stock. This
transaction, which is expected to close in the quarter ending December 31, 2000,
is intended to be accounted for as a pooling of interests. The transaction is
subject to the approval of shareholders of IPS as well as court and regulatory
approvals. As of September 30, 2000, $112,000 of expenses related to the
business combination had been capitalized as prepaid expense and will be
expensed in the period that the combination is consummated.
NOTE 13--QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
The Company accounted for the acquisition of CR Technology as a pooling of
interests for accounting purposes. All previously reported amounts have been
restated to reflect the effect of the pooling.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) December 31 March 31 June 30 September 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Fiscal 2000:
Revenue $16,871 $19,172 $22,086 $24,105
Gross margin 7,588 9,060 10,516 11,734
Income from operations 1,836(1) 3,234 3,944 4,802
Net income 1,522(1) 3,376 4,523 5,332
Earnings per share:
Basic $ 0.16(1) $ 0.31 $ 0.39 $ 0.45
Diluted $ 0.14(1) $ 0.28 $ 0.36 $ 0.42
Fiscal 1999:
Revenue $ 6,504 $10,326 $13,700 $14,901
Gross margin 2,255 4,469 6,201 6,933
Income (loss) from operations (1,525) 336 1,737 2,227
Net income (loss) (1,488) 279 1,478 2,004
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ (0.16) $ 0.03 $ 0.16 $ 0.21
Diluted $ (0.16) $ 0.03 $ 0.15 $ 0.19
</TABLE>
(1) Includes non-recurring acquisition charges of $860,000. Income from
operations, net income, basic and diluted earnings per share would have
been $2.7 million, $2.4 million, $0.25 and $0.22, respectively, excluding
these charges.
39
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this report in that
the registrant will file a definitive Proxy Statement within 120 days after the
end of its fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A ("Proxy Statement") for its
2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 14, 2000, and the
information included therein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the directors
and executive officers of Photon Dynamics, Inc. Additional information required
by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's Proxy
Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- -------- ---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr................... 52 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Richard L. Dissly......................... 56 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
William K. Pratt.......................... 63 Chief Technical Officer
Richard E. Amtower........................ 57 Vice President of Photon Dynamics, Inc. and
President of CR Technology, Inc.
Bernard T. Clark.......................... 56 Vice President, Manufacturing and Field Operations
Bruce P. Delmore.......................... 39 Vice President, Marketing, Strategy and Business
Development
Jeffrey A. Hawthorne...................... 42 Vice President, Development
Steve Song................................ 45 Vice President, Sales
E. Floyd Kvamme........................... 62 Chairman of the Board and Director
Richard P. Beck........................... 67 Director
Barry L. Cox.............................. 58 Director
Francois J. Henley (1).................... 41 Director
Michael J. Kim............................ 55 Director
Malcolm J. Thompson....................... 55 Director
</TABLE>
------------------------
(1) Mr. Henley has resigned from the Company's Board of Directors as of
October 23, 2000.
VINCENT F. SOLLITTO, JR. has been Chief Executive Officer since June 1996
and has been a Director of the Company since July 1996. From August 1993 until
1996, Mr. Sollitto was the General Manager of Business Unit Operations for
Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc. From April 1991 until August 1993, he was the
Executive Vice President of Technical Operations at Supercomputer Systems, Inc.
Prior to joining Supercomputer Systems, Inc., he spent 21 years in various
management positions at IBM. He currently serves on the boards of directors of
Irvine Sensors Corporation, Applied Films Corporation and Ultratech
Stepper, Inc.
RICHARD L. DISSLY has been Chief Financial Officer since November 1998. He
was appointed Secretary of the Company in October 1999. He was Chief Financial
Officer of Semaphore Communications from January 1997 until October 1998 and
Chief Financial Officer of CrossCheck Technology from July 1992 until
December 1996.
40
<PAGE>
DR. WILLIAM K. PRATT has been Chief Technical Officer since October 1996. In
1993, Dr. Pratt founded Pixelsoft, Inc., an image processing software
development company, and served in various management and technical positions
until 1996. From 1988 through 1994, he was Director of Multimedia and Imaging
Technology at Sun Microsystems, Inc. Dr. Pratt holds five patents and is the
author of several books on image processing.
RICHARD E. AMTOWER joined the Company as Vice President in November 1999. He
has been President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
CR Technology, Inc. since 1984.
BERNARD T. CLARK has been Vice President of Manufacturing and Field
Operations since May 2000. From 1995 until 2000, Mr. Clark was the Director of
Process and Product Assurance for IBM Storage Systems Division.
BRUCE P. DELMORE has been Vice President of Marketing, Strategy and Business
Development since August 1999. He was President of Strategos Group, a strategy
consulting firm, from 1997 until 1999. From 1994 until 1997, Mr. Delmore held
several executive positions including Director of EDA and Strategic ASIC
Development at Fujitsu Microelectronics.
JEFFREY A. HAWTHORNE has been Vice President of Development since
September 1994. Mr. Hawthorne joined the Company in 1991 and has held a series
of other management positions.
STEVE SONG has been Vice President of Sales since August 1998. Mr. Song
joined the Company in April 1994 as the Korean Sales and Support Manager. He was
promoted to Director of Korean Operations in August 1995 and established the
Company's Korean subsidiary.
E. FLOYD KVAMME has been Chairman of the Board and a Director of the Company
since 1986. He is the general partner of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers since
1984. Mr. Kvamme currently serves on the boards of directors of Harmonic, Inc.,
Brio Technology, National Semiconductor, Power Integrations, Inc. and several
privately held companies.
RICHARD P. BECK joined the Company as a Director in September 2000. He has
served as Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. since
1992. Mr. Beck currently serves on the boards of directors of Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. and Applied Films Corporation.
BARRY L. COX has been a Director of the Company since 1990. He joined
Quantum Effect Devices in July 1998, which was acquired by PMC-Sierra in
August 2000. He has served as a consultant for various companies from
January 1996 until July 1998. From 1993 until 1995, he was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Weitek Corporation as well as its President, Chief
Operating Officer and Director from 1992 until 1993. Mr. Cox currently serves as
Chairman of the Board of Quantum Effect Devices and serves on the boards of
directors of several privately held companies.
FRANCOIS J. HENLEY founded and has been a Director of the Company since
1986. From 1986 until July 1997, he held various management and technical
positions that included President and Chief Technical Officer of the Company.
Mr. Henley has served as Chief Executive Officer of Silicon Genesis Corporation
since June 1997.
MICHAEL J. KIM has served as a Director of the Company since 1991. He
currently is Vice President of Business Development at FDS, Philips Components
in San Jose, California since September 1999. From 1993 until February 1999, he
was corporate Senior Vice President of LG Electronics, Inc. and has served as
the head of the San Jose Technology Center of LG Electronics, Inc.
DR. MALCOLM J. THOMPSON has served as a Director of the Company since 1992.
He currently is President and Chief Executive Officer of Novalux, Inc. since
1998. From 1996 to 1998, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of
dpiX, Inc. From 1981 until 1996, Dr. Thompson held various positions at Xerox
PARC including Chief Technologist. He also has served as Chairman of the Board
of the United States Display Consortium, an industry-government consortium of
over 135 member companies.
41
<PAGE>
The information required by this Item concerning compliance with
section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference from the
Company's Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the
heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance."
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein by
reference from the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders under the heading "Executive Compensation."
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein by
reference from the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management."
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein by
reference from the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(A) THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT:
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See Index to Financial Statements.
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following financial statement schedule is filed as part of this Annual
Report. All other financial statement schedules have been omitted because
they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
SCHEDULE II
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at Charged to Balance at
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, Beginning of Charged to Other End of
(IN THOUSANDS) Period Expense Accounts Deductions Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful
accounts:
2000 $1,301 -- 419 51 $1,669
1999 $ 864 346 100 9 $1,301
1998 $ 991 (230) 268 165 $ 864
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE>
(B) EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXHIBIT
--------------------- -------
<C> <S>
3.1(A) Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant.
3.2(C) Bylaws of the Registrant and amendments thereto.
4.1(A) Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
10.1(A) First Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement between
Registrant and the shareholders set forth therein dated
May 11, 1994.
l0.2(A) Fourth Amended Shareholders Agreement for Photon
Dynamics, Inc. between the Registrant and the shareholders
set forth therein dated May 11, 1994.
10.3(A) Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and
each of its executive officers and directors.
10.4(A) 1987 Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement.
10.5(A) 1995 Stock Option Plan and Forms of Stock Option Agreements.
10.6(A) 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.7(B) Lease agreement between Berg & Berg Developers and
Registrant dated August 6, 1996.
10.8(A) Sales Agent Agreement between the Registrant, K.K. Photon
Dynamics and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.,
Ltd. dated June 1, 1992, the amendment thereto dated
November 17, 1993 and the modification agreement related
thereto dated January 1, 1995.
10.9(A) License Agreement between the Registrant and
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. dated
June 1, 1992 and the addendum thereto dated November 11,
1993.
10.10(A) Commercialization Agreement between the Registrant and
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. dated
June 1, 1992 and the amendment thereto dated November 17,
1993.
10.13(A) Form of Amendment to First Amended and Restated Investor
Rights Agreement.
10.14(B) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Vincent Sollitto dated July 1, 1996.
10.15(D) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Richard Dissly dated November 1, 1998.
10.16(D) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Jeffrey Hawthrone dated October 15, 1995.
10.17 Office Building Lease between Integrated Chip Corporation
and Photon Dynamics, Inc. dated September 6, 2000.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.2 Consent of Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation, Independent
Auditors.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
Key to Exhibits:
(A) Previously filed on Registrants' Registration Statement on Form SB-2 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on November 15,
1995.
(B) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
December 30, 1996.
(C) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
December 18, 1998.
(D) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
October 27, 1999.
(C) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
None.
43
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
PHOTON DYNAMICS, INC.
By: /s/ VINCENT F. SOLLITTO, JR.
-----------------------------------------
Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr.
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
DIRECTOR
Dated: November 7, 2000
</TABLE>
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr. and Richard L. Dissly,
and each of them, acting individually, as his or her attorney-in-fact, each with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
President, Chief Executive
/s/ VINCENT F. SOLLITTO, JR. Officer and Director
------------------------------------------- (Principle Executive November 7, 2000
Vincent F. Sollitto, Jr. Officer)
Chief Financial Officer and
/s/ RICHARD L. DISSLY Secretary (Principle
------------------------------------------- Financial and Accounting November 7, 2000
Richard L. Dissly Officer)
/s/ E. FLOYD KVAMME
------------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board and November 7, 2000
E. Floyd Kvamme Director
/s/ RICHARD P. BECK
------------------------------------------- Director November 7, 2000
Richard P. Beck
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ BARRY L. COX
------------------------------------------- Director November 7, 2000
Barry L. Cox
/s/ MICHAEL J. KIM
------------------------------------------- Director November 7, 2000
Michael J. Kim
/s/ MALCOLM J. THOMPSON
------------------------------------------- Director November 7, 2000
Malcolm J. Thompson
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER EXHIBIT
--------------------- -------
<C> <S>
3.1(A) Form of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant.
3.2(C) Bylaws of the Registrant and amendments thereto.
4.1(A) Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
10.1(A) First Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement between
Registrant and the shareholders set forth therein dated
May 11, 1994.
l0.2(A) Fourth Amended Shareholders Agreement for Photon
Dynamics, Inc. between the Registrant and the shareholders
set forth therein dated May 11, 1994.
10.3(A) Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and
each of its executive officers and directors.
10.4(A) 1987 Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement.
10.5(A) 1995 Stock Option Plan and Forms of Stock Option Agreements.
10.6(A) 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
10.7(B) Lease agreement between Berg & Berg Developers and
Registrant dated August 6, 1996.
10.8(A) Sales Agent Agreement between the Registrant, K.K. Photon
Dynamics and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.,
Ltd. dated June 1, 1992, the amendment thereto dated
November 17, 1993 and the modification agreement related
thereto dated January 1, 1995.
10.9(A) License Agreement between the Registrant and
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. dated
June 1, 1992 and the addendum thereto dated November 11,
1993.
10.10(A) Commercialization Agreement between the Registrant and
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. dated
June 1, 1992 and the amendment thereto dated November 17,
1993.
10.13(A) Form of Amendment to First Amended and Restated Investor
Rights Agreement.
10.14(B) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Vincent Sollitto dated July 1, 1996.
10.15(D) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Richard Dissly dated November 1, 1998.
10.16(D) Agreement Regarding Change of Control between the Registrant
and Jeffrey Hawthrone dated October 15, 1995.
10.17 Office Building Lease between Integrated Chip Corporation
and Photon Dynamics, Inc. dated September 6, 2000.
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.2 Consent of Cacciamatta Accountancy Corporation, Independent
Auditors.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
Key to Exhibits:
(A) Previously filed on Registrants' Registration Statement on Form SB-2 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on November 15,
1995.
(B) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
December 30, 1996.
(C) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
December 18, 1998.
(D) Previously filed on Registrant's Form 10-KSB as filed with the SEC on
October 27, 1999.
