<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
(X) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
( ) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 For the period from _________________ to
__________________
Commission File No. 0-27268
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
--------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
a Delaware corporation 33-0682821
- ------------------------------- --------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of IRS Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
12750 High Bluff Drive, Suite 320
San Diego, California 92130
- --------------------------------- ----------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (619) 793-6300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past ninety days. Yes X No ____
---
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was $16,435,591 as of March 14, 1997, computed based upon the closing
price of such stock on the Nasdaq National Market on such date.
As of March 14, 1997, the following number of shares of the Company's capital
stock were outstanding: 8,472,978.
Indicated by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in the
definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K |_|
Exhibit Index on Page _______
1
<PAGE> 2
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1 Business ............................................................................. 1
Item 2 Property ............................................................................. 13
Item 3 Legal Proceedings .................................................................... 13
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders .................................. 14
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant's Equity and Related Stockholder Matters ....................... 14
Item 6 Selected Financial Data .............................................................. 15
Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 16
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .......................................... 25
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . 49
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ................................... 49
Item 11 Executive Compensation ............................................................... 52
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ....................... 52
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ....................................... 52
PART IV
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K .................... 52
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation ("ACC") and its wholly owned
subsidiaries OFL-A Receivables Corp. ("OFL-A") and ACC Receivables Corp.
("Receivables") (collectively the "Company") specialize in the indirect
financing of installment contracts for automobile purchases ("Contracts"). These
Contracts are originated primarily by franchised automobile dealers ("Dealers")
on late-model used vehicles, as well as some new vehicles, for borrowers who
might not be able to qualify for traditional automobile loans or leases
("Non-Prime Borrowers"). The Company's business strategy currently calls for the
sale of virtually all Contracts through asset securitizations, rather than
holding Contracts to maturity. To this end, the Company periodically securitizes
pools of its Contracts in order to redeploy its capital, reduce interest rate
risk and realize a gain on the sale of these Contracts. The Company believes
that its competitive advantages include its national presence, risk-based
pricing, financial resources, nationwide consistency of credit decisions and
quality Dealer service.
NON-PRIME AUTOMOBILE FINANCE INDUSTRY
Automobile financing is one of the largest consumer finance markets in
the United States, with $356 billion in automobile-related credit outstanding as
of September 1996. In general, the automobile finance industry can be divided
into two principal segments: a prime credit market and a non-prime credit
market. Traditional automobile finance companies, such as commercial banks,
savings and loans, thrift and loans, credit unions and captive finance companies
of automobile manufacturers, generally provide credit to the most creditworthy
borrowers, or so-called "prime borrowers."
The so-called "non-prime" credit market, in which the Company operates,
provides financing to Non-Prime Borrowers, who are those borrowers who have had
past credit problems (including bankruptcy), have limited or no credit histories
and/or have low incomes. Historically, traditional automobile financing sources
have not serviced the non-prime market or have done so only through programs
that were not consistently available. An industry group of independent finance
companies specializing in non-prime automobile financing has emerged, but the
industry remains highly fragmented, with no company having a significant share
of this non-prime market.
The Company estimates that the size of the non-prime automobile market
may be as large as $70 billion in outstanding installment debt. The Company
believes that the number of Non-Prime Borrowers is increasing due to, among
other factors, declining real wages, the greater willingness on the part of
consumers to seek bankruptcy protection, the high cost of new automobiles
relative to consumer incomes and the greater availability of late-model used
vehicles coming off short-term lease programs. The Company's program is designed
to provide financing to this market segment.
PURCHASE OF CONTRACTS
Sales and Marketing
The Company markets its financing program primarily to franchised
Dealers and to a limited number of independent used automobile Dealers. Before
purchasing Contracts from a Dealer, ACC and the Dealer enter into an agreement
("Dealer Agreement") that provides the Company with recourse to the Dealer in
cases of Dealer fraud or a breach of the Dealer's representations and
warranties. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had 1,377 active Dealers,
defined as Dealers from which the Company had purchased at least one Contract in
the last six months, compared to 547 active Dealers as of December 31, 1995.
The Company typically solicits business from Dealers through its
regional sales managers ("RSMs"), each of whom is assigned an exclusive
territory. The Company typically hires RSMs who have experience with the
purchase of non-prime Contracts and who have pre-existing, established
relationships with Dealers in a particular major metropolitan area.
1
<PAGE> 4
RSMs meet regularly with Dealers to provide information about the
Company's program, train Dealer personnel as to the Company's program
requirements and assist Dealers in identifying consumers who qualify for the
Company's program. As of December 31, 1996, the Company marketed its program to
Dealers in 31 states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan,
Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,
Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. The Company targets major metropolitan
areas because it believes they provide concentrations of high volume Dealers,
which can be effectively serviced by its RSMs. The Company purchased $500,000 or
more of Contracts from 26 states during the year ended December 31, 1996,
compared to 18 states during the year ended December 31, 1995.
RSMs typically target the late-model used vehicle business of
franchised Dealers. The Company believes that late-model used vehicles represent
the largest segment of the used vehicle market, while posing less risk of
default due to mechanical problems than do older used vehicles. The Company
targets franchised Dealers because the financial requirements and customer
service standards imposed on these dealers by automobile manufacturers generally
result in a high level of financial stability and customer satisfaction. As a
result, the Company believes that, in general, Contracts from these Dealers
expose the Company to less risk of Dealer misrepresentation and lower levels of
borrower default.
Dealer Reviews
Each month, senior management reviews Dealer performance reports that
track, by Dealer, the number of applications submitted, the number of
applications approved, the number of applications funded, the ratio of
applications funded to applications received ("efficiency ratio"), delinquency
ratios and default rates. Senior management maintains a Dealer "watch list" to
track the performance of Dealers with low efficiency ratios, high delinquency
ratios or high default levels relative to the overall portfolio.
Regional Credit Centers
The Company serves its Dealers on a regional basis through its regional
credit centers. The Company believes that these regional centers provide a
sufficient local market presence to meet the needs of its Dealers, without
incurring the reduction in operating controls and economies of scale that can
result from operating a large number of small branches. The Company currently
has regional credit centers in Atlanta, Georgia; Dallas, Texas; Miami, Florida;
Newark, Delaware; and San Diego, California.
Application Processing and Purchase Criteria
Dealers submit credit applications to one of the Company's regional
credit centers, typically by facsimile. Upon the Company's receipt of a credit
application, a credit processor uses an automated system to obtain credit
histories, determine the wholesale value of the vehicle and calculate the credit
score of the application. The Company's credit officers use the credit score as
a guide to evaluate applications, but the approval/declination decision is not
based solely on the credit score. Individual credit officers have limited
approval authority. The approval of a more senior credit manager is required
when the credit score or the amount financed exceeds the individual credit
officer's approval limits. The Company's regional credit centers then notify
Dealers by facsimile of a credit decision, usually within three hours of receipt
of the application.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company approved
approximately 20% of the applications it received and funded approximately 66%
of the applications that were approved. The Company believes Dealers select
among finance companies based upon price, term, advance, down payment
requirements, stipulations, timeliness of the finance company's approval and the
historic reliability of the finance company's funding of purchases.
The Non-Prime Borrowers under Contracts of the type typically purchased
by the Company generally have credit histories which include past bankruptcies,
significant charged-off accounts and/or multiple collection accounts. Further,
other Contracts may be purchased by the Company for borrowers with limited or no
credit histories. In light of the deficiencies in the borrowers' credit
histories, the Company's credit officers evaluate other
2
<PAGE> 5
potential offsetting factors such as the borrowers' residence stability,
employment stability, income level relative to expenses and past performance on
other automobile-related debt. If, in the credit officers' judgment, there are
enough mitigating positive factors, such Contracts may be approved for purchase
by the Company.
To be eligible for purchase, a Contract must be fully amortizing and
provide for level payments over the term of the Contract, must grant a first
priority security interest in the financed vehicle to OFL-A, must prohibit the
sale or transfer of the financed vehicle without the Company's consent and must
allow for acceleration of the maturity of the Contract if the vehicle is sold or
transferred without this consent. The portions of payments on Contracts
allocable to principal and interest are, for payoff and deficiency purposes,
determined in accordance with the law of the state in which the Contract was
originated.
Each Contract includes a requirement that the borrower maintain fire,
theft and collision insurance on the financed vehicle and name the Company as a
loss payee. As part of the funding process, the Company verifies by telephone
that insurance is in place on the financed vehicle; however, as of December 31,
1996, approximately 12% of borrowers had canceled their insurance or allowed
their insurance policies to lapse, compared to 20% as of December 31, 1995.
Although the Contracts permit the Company to force-place insurance, the Company,
as a matter of policy, generally does not force-place insurance due to the added
collection and litigation risk.
Funding Package Completion, Verification and Funding
After receiving an approval from one of the Company's regional credit
centers and compiling a set of documents the Dealers believe to be consistent
with the Company's documentation requirements, the Dealers send these funding
packages to the Company's central funding group in San Diego. The Company
generally requires that funding packages include proof of the borrower's
residency, income, insurance and title.
The Company's funding department reviews each Contract and verifies the
application data and Contract documentation. The funding department also
confirms or reconfirms the borrower's employment and the insurance on the
vehicle. The Company believes one of the most important verifications is a
direct telephone interview of the borrower to confirm the terms of the Contract,
the source of the down payment and the equipment on the vehicle. The Company
typically will not fund a Contract without a prior telephone interview of the
borrower. The Company believes this process reduces the risk of
misrepresentation by Dealers and/or borrowers and provides a basis for future
borrower contact.
A funding package may be returned if it does not comply with the terms
of the initial approval or if the Company discovers facts that were not
disclosed during the approval process. The Company returns unfunded
approximately 10% of all completed funding packages for these reasons, a portion
of which are later resubmitted in approvable form. As an additional quality
control check, the Company's data processing systems perform an automated review
of the Contracts and identify any characteristics not in compliance with the
Company's minimum underwriting standards.
Post-Funding Quality Reviews
The Company uses its automated systems to continue to monitor Contracts
after funding. In addition, the Company's quality control manager completes a
full quality control review of a random sample of 5% of the newly-originated
Contracts. This review focuses on compliance with underwriting standards, the
quality of the credit decision and the completeness of Contract documentation.
On a periodic basis, the Company's quality control manager issues a report to
the Company's senior management summarizing (by credit officer) policy
exceptions, processing errors, documentation deficiencies and credit decisions
which the quality control manager considered overly aggressive. The bonuses of
the Company's credit officers are, in part, dependent upon results of these
quality control reviews.
3
<PAGE> 6
Risk-Based Pricing
The Company uses statistical information and its automated Contract
purchasing systems to establish different pricing programs by geographic region,
by borrower credit characteristics or, in some cases, by Dealer; all tied to the
expected economic value of each program to the Company.
The Company maintains a database which tracks key underwriting
parameters for each Contract purchased since the formation of the Company. This
database is updated periodically to reflect the payment performance of each
Contract. The Company uses this information to identify and aggregate a pool of
Contracts that have failed to perform as anticipated. Each Contract in this pool
is then matched against a performing Contract with the same date of purchase. By
statistically comparing the characteristics of these two pools over time, the
Company is able to refine periodically its credit evaluation processes and
believes it is better able to price each of its programs based upon the expected
risk of each program.
CONTRACT PORTFOLIO
The following table sets forth certain data for the Contracts purchased
by the Company for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONTRACTS PURCHASED DURING
THE THREE-MONTHS ENDED:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MAR. 31, DEC. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Amount of Contracts (000's).................. $61,474 $53,431 $45,253 $33,715 $26,478
Average Amount Financed Under
Contracts .................................. $12,704 $12,475 $12,290 $12,278 $12,124
Average Coupon on Contracts .................. 20.53% 20.74% 20.72% 20.65% 20.47%
Average Original Term of Contracts
(months) ................................. 58 57 57 57 58
Average Discount of Contracts, including
Acquisition Fees ......................... 4.10% 4.37% 5.16% 4.87% 5.14%
</TABLE>
The Company expects from time to time to make changes to its
underwriting guidelines and program requirements to respond to competitive
conditions in the non-prime automobile financing market. These changes are
likely to affect the characteristics of the portfolio, may increase portfolio
risk and/or reduce the Company's discounts and interest margins. In the quarter
ended September 30, 1996, the Company instituted several programs that provided
its Dealers with greater pricing options than were previously available,
introduced certain new programs and provided more attractive pricing on certain
existing programs. As expected, this had the effect of lowering the average
discount and acquisition fees on Contracts purchased.
4
<PAGE> 7
CONCENTRATIONS OF CONTRACT PURCHASES
The following table sets forth information by state concerning Contract
purchases and servicing portfolio amounts (including Contracts owned and
Contracts sold in asset-backed securities) outstanding for the period and at the
date indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SERVICING PORTFOLIO
CONTRACTS PURCHASED OUTSTANDING
DURING THE YEAR ENDED BALANCES AS OF
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1996
---------------------------------------------------
(000S) (%) (000S) (%)
-------- -------- -------- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California ... $ 47,123 24% $ 65,500 26%
Texas ........ 33,378 17 50,617 20
Florida ...... 24,851 13 32,576 13
Pennsylvania.. 13,941 7 16,899 7
All Other .... 74,580 39 86,159 34
-------- --- -------- ---
$193,873 100% $251,751 100%
======== === ======== ===
</TABLE>
The Company attempts to develop a broad base of Dealers to avoid
dependence on a limited number of Dealers. As of December 31, 1996, no one
Dealer accounted for more than 3% of the Company's Contract portfolio and the
ten Dealers from which the Company purchased the most Contracts accounted for
approximately 10% of total Contracts purchased. The Company's financing program
concentrates on purchases of Contracts for late-model used vehicles that are
originated by franchised Dealers. As of December 31, 1996, 88% of Contracts
serviced by the Company financed used late-model vehicles and 97% were acquired
from franchised Dealers.
CONTRACT SERVICING
General
ACC services all of the Contracts the Company originates, whether owned
by the Company or sold in an asset-backed security. ACC's servicing generally
consists of payment and pay-off processing, collecting, insurance tracking,
title tracking, responding to borrower inquiries, investigating delinquencies,
repossessing and reselling collateral, collection reporting and credit
performance monitoring.
Billing and Collection Process
The Company sends each borrower a monthly bill, rather than using
payment coupon books. All payments are directed to the Company's lock-box
account at a regional commercial bank. On a daily basis, the lock-box bank
retrieves and processes payments received, and then deposits the entire amount
into the lock-box account. A simultaneous electronic data transfer of borrower
payment data is made to the Company for posting to the Company's computerized
records.
The Company's collection process is based on a strategy of closely
monitoring Contracts and maintaining frequent contact with borrowers. As part of
this process, the Company makes early, frequent contact with delinquent
borrowers and attempts to educate borrowers on how to manage monthly budgets.
The Company attempts to identify the underlying causes of a borrower's
delinquency and to make an early collection risk assessment. The Company
believes that its proactive collection process, including the early
identification of payment problems, reduces its repossession rates and loss
levels.
In support of its collection efforts, the Company maintains collection
software with customized features designed for high-intensity collection
operations, which includes a high-penetration autodialer. With the aid of the
autodialer, the Company initially attempts to contact any borrower whose account
becomes six days past due.
Although the Company emphasizes telephonic contact, the Company also
typically sends past due notices to borrowers when an account becomes ten days
past due. In some cases, the Company uses the Western Union
5
<PAGE> 8
Quick Collection Service to collect borrowers' payments and to reduce the
incidence of bad checks. When necessary, the Company uses a network of
independent agencies to make field visits to borrowers.
Extensions and Modifications
If a borrower has current financial difficulties, but has previously
demonstrated a positive history of payment on the Contract, the Company will
permit a payment extension of not more than two months during the term of a
Contract. Senior management of the Company must approve each extension and less
than 2% of the Contracts in the Company's servicing portfolio had been extended
as of December 31, 1996. Further, the Company typically permits only one
extension over the term of a Contract and the Company neither restructures
Contracts nor forbears any payments on Contracts.
Repossession
The Company repossesses a vehicle when resolution of a delinquency is
not likely or when the Company believes that its collateral is at risk. The
Company makes these judgments based upon its collectors' discussions with
borrowers, the ability or inability to locate the borrowers and/or the vehicles,
the receipt of notices of liens and other information. The Company uses
independent, licensed and bonded repossession agencies to repossess vehicles as
well as the services of an agency that traces skips (where neither the borrower
nor the vehicle can be located) to supplement its own efforts in locating
vehicles. When a vehicle is repossessed, it generally is sold through a public
auction within 60 days of the repossession. The Company uses its own staff to
pursue recoveries of deficiency balances and also uses outside collection
agencies which share in any recoveries. If the Company has reason to believe
that a Dealer violated any representations or warranties made to the Company on
a defaulted Contract, the Company may pursue its remedies against the Dealer
under the Dealer Agreement.
The Company employs the same policies for charging-off Contracts on
both Contracts it owns and on Contracts sold in asset-backed securities. The
Company expects to incur a loss whenever it repossesses a vehicle. When the
Company sells a repossessed vehicle, it records a net loss equal to the
outstanding principal balance of the Contract, less the proceeds from the sale
of the vehicle.
If an account becomes 120 days delinquent (other than accounts in
bankruptcy) and the Company has repossessed the vehicle, but not yet received
the sale proceeds, the Company will record a loss equal to the outstanding
principal balance of the Contract, less the estimated auction value of the
vehicle (which is based upon wholesale used car values published by nationally
recognized firms) and any expected recoveries under its VSI insurance. This VSI
insurance protects the Company's interest in the collateral against uninsured
physical damage (including total loss). If an account becomes 120 days
delinquent and the Company has not repossessed the vehicle, then the Company
records a loss equal to the outstanding principal balance of the Contract. Any
recoveries received subsequent to the Contract being charged-off, including
amounts (i) from the borrower's insurance policies or service contracts, (ii)
from Dealers under a breach of the Dealer Agreements or (iii) from deficiency
balances recovered from borrowers, are treated as loss adjustments in the period
when these recoveries are received. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Conditions and Results of Operations" for a discussion of VSI
insurance.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
The Company relies on automated information management and data
processing systems to maximize productivity, minimize credit losses and maintain
data integrity. The Company operates its information management, accounting and
data processing systems on a Model 300, IBM AS400 ("AS400").
The Company uses its own proprietary Application Processing System and
Contract Management System, both of which operate on the AS400. The Application
Processing System tracks applications through the approval process and provides
status reports to sales and credit administration personnel on approved and
declined Contracts. This system is also used for credit scoring and credit
review. The Application Processing System electronically transmits all data to
the Contract Management System. The Contract Management System analyzes
Contracts for
6
<PAGE> 9
compliance with the Company's underwriting standards, tracks key underwriting
characteristics for all funded Contracts, tracks approval trends, analyzes
charge-offs, monitors delinquencies and measures pool performance.
The Company uses the Universal Loan Accounting package resident on the
AS400 for all aspects of its loan accounting and payment processing. The
Company's general ledger is maintained on the MAS-90 General Ledger package. The
Company uses collection software that operates on the AS400. The Company also
has installed IBM's ImagePlus(TM) imaging system on the AS400 to make Contract
documents available on-screen, decrease data entry costs and aid disaster
recovery. Further, the Company has installed video teleconference and document
sharing systems, which facilitate interaction between the Company's headquarters
and its regional credit centers. In its collection efforts, the Company uses a
Telerelations, Inc. high-penetration autodialer, which is a PC-LAN-based system
interfaced to the AS400.
The Company backs up its systems on a daily basis and stores the backup
tapes off-site. The Company also has implemented a disaster recovery plan that
is intended to restore critical business operations within 48 hours of a
disaster. In an emergency, IBM will deliver replacement parts for the AS400
within 24 hours. Additionally, the Company has the contractual right to access
SunGard's nationwide recovery facilities, which are fully equipped and permit
access to hardware, software and telephones. The Company has made a significant
investment in its hardware and software systems and intends to continue to
upgrade these systems as its needs dictate.
SECURITIZATION OF CONTRACTS
In June 1995, the Company began selling its portfolio of Contracts to
investors through the issuance of asset-backed securities. The periodic
securitization of Contracts is an integral part of the Company's business plan.
The issuance of these securities enables the Company to redeploy capital, reduce
its interest rate risk and recognize gains from the sale of the Contracts.
Through December 31, 1996, the Company had completed six securitizations,
involving Contracts aggregating approximately $292 million.
These asset-backed securities are treated as sales of the Contracts and
Contracts sold in a security are removed from the consolidated balance sheet of
the Company. The asset-backed securities are generally structured as follows:
ACC repurchases a pool of Contracts from its interim financing facility and
simultaneously sells the pool to Receivables, which then sells the pool to a
trust in exchange for interest-bearing certificates of an amount equal to the
aggregate principal balance of the Contracts. The certificates are then sold to
one or more institutional investors. The principal and interest due on these
certificates are guaranteed by Financial Securities Assurance, Inc. ("FSA") and,
as a result, are rated "AAA" by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group and "Aaa" by
Moody's Investors Service. The certificates sold to investors have fixed
pass-through interest rates, which through December 31, 1996, have ranged from
5.95% to 6.90%.
The Company retains the right to service the Contracts sold to the
trusts and receives monthly base servicing fees of approximately 3% per annum on
the outstanding balance of Contracts sold in asset-backed securities. In
addition, Receivables (or OFL-A, if Receivables' rights are assigned to OFL-A
for pledge under the NIM Facility (as defined herein)) is entitled to receive
excess interest arising from collections, to the extent that these collections
exceed payments to investors, contributions to the credit enhancement cash
reserves, base servicing fees and certain other fees. Generally, certificates
are sold to investors without recourse, except that the representations and
warranties provided by Dealers to the Company are similarly provided by the
Company to the investors and to FSA, along with certain indemnities. These
indemnities are secured by a pledge of all of the stock of Receivables.
Receivables is obligated to repurchase a Contract from the trust if the Contract
fails to conform to normal representations and warranties relating to the
collateral. Receivables bears the risk of loss on Contracts it repurchases.
Each issuance of securities results in the recognition of a "net gain
on sale of Contracts" on the Company's consolidated statement of operations for
the period in which the sale was made. The discounted present value of the
excess cash flow expected from the security is recognized as an increase in the
Excess Servicing Receivables ("ESRs") on the Company's consolidated balance
sheet. Because the interest rate on the Contracts is relatively high in
comparison to the pass-through interest rate paid to investors, the net gain on
sale can be significant. In calculating this net gain on sale, the Company must
estimate the future rates of prepayments, delinquencies, defaults
7
<PAGE> 10
and loss severity as they impact the amount and timing of the cash flows used in
the gain on sale calculation. The cash flows expected to be received by
Receivables, before expected losses, are then discounted at a market interest
rate that the Company believes an unaffiliated third-party purchaser would
require as a rate of return on such a financial instrument. Expected losses are
discounted using a risk-free rate which is equivalent to the rate earned on
securities rated AAA or Aaa or better, with a duration similar to the estimated
duration for the underlying Contracts. (See Footnote 1(i) of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.)
In future periods, the Company will recognize additional revenue if the
actual performance of the Contracts is better than that originally estimated. If
the actual performance of the Contracts is worse than originally estimated, then
the Company will be required to recognize a write-down against the ESRs, which
would result in a reduction in net income during the period in which the
write-down occurred.
Under the servicing agreement for each security, the Company is
obligated to service all Contracts sold to the trusts in accordance with the
Company's standard procedures. The servicing agreements generally provide that
the Company will bear all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
management, administration and collection of the Contracts serviced. The
servicing agreements can be terminated by the investor in the event of certain
defaults by the Company and under certain other circumstances.
COMPETITION
The automobile financing business is highly competitive. The Company
competes with a growing number of publicly and privately held national, regional
and local automobile finance companies that specialize in non-prime automobile
finance, many of which compete directly with the Company for Contracts. These
competitors include AmeriCredit Corp., AutoFinance Group (a subsidiary of
KeyCorp), Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. and First Merchants Acceptance Corp.
The Company does not believe that any of the finance companies specializing in
Non-Prime Borrowers currently has more than a 2% market share.
In addition, the Company competes, or may compete in the future, for
business with more traditional automobile financing sources, such as commercial
banks, savings and loans, thrift and loans, credit unions and captive finance
companies of automobile manufacturers such as General Motors Acceptance
Corporation, Ford Motor Credit Corporation, Chrysler Financial Corporation,
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Nissan Motors Acceptance Corporation and
American Honda Finance. These traditional automobile finance companies may lower
credit standards or introduce programs for Non-Prime Borrowers to attract more
financing business or, in the case of the captive finance companies, to
stimulate new vehicle sales.
Many of the Company's competitors and potential competitors have
substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than the Company
and may be more successful in expanding into new geographic markets, building
Dealer networks and increasing market share through internal growth or
acquisition. The larger, more established companies have access to unsecured
commercial paper, investment-grade corporate debt and to other funding sources
that may provide them with an advantageous cost of capital relative to the
Company's cost of capital.
The captive finance companies and many of the other traditional
automobile finance companies have long-standing relationships with Dealers that
may give them a competitive advantage in establishing dealer networks for the
purchase of Contracts. Many of these companies provide other types of financing,
including inventory financing, which is not offered by the Company.
The Company believes that the industry competes for Dealers on the
basis of the price charged to the Dealer for the purchase of Contracts (which is
a function of the Contract purchase discount to the face value of a Contract and
any applicable fees), advance limitations, down payment requirements,
stipulations, the timeliness of the finance company's response to an
application, the approved Contract terms, documentation requirements for
purchase of the Contract and the historic reliability of the finance company's
funding of purchases. The Company believes that its competitive advantages
include geographic diversification, risk-based pricing, financial resources,
nationwide consistency of credit decisions and quality Dealer service.
8
<PAGE> 11
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company has obtained and maintains licenses and registrations
required by certain states' sales finance company laws and/or laws regulating
purchases of installment or conditional sales contracts. The Company intends to
obtain and maintain any and all additional qualifications, registrations and
licenses necessary for the lawful conduct of its business and operations.
Numerous federal and state consumer protection laws, including the
Federal Truth-In-Lending Act, the Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the
Federal Trade Commission Act, the Federal Reserve Board's Regulations B and Z,
and state motor vehicle retail installment sales acts, retail installment sales
acts and other similar laws regulate the origination and collection of consumer
receivables and impact the Company's business. The relevant laws, among other
things, (A) require the Company to (i) obtain and maintain certain licenses and
qualifications, (ii) limit the finance charges, fees and other charges on the
Contracts purchased and (iii) provide specified disclosures to consumers; (B)
limit the terms of the Contracts; (C) regulate the credit application and
evaluation process; (D) regulate certain servicing and collection practices; and
(E) regulate the repossession and sale of collateral. These laws impose specific
statutory liabilities upon creditors who fail to comply with their provisions
and may give rise to defense to payment of the consumer's obligation. In
addition, certain of the laws make the assignee of a consumer installment
contract liable for the violations of the assignor.
The Dealer Agreement contains representations and warranties by the
Dealer that, as of the date of assignment, the Dealer has complied with all
applicable laws and regulations with respect to each Contract. The Dealer is
obligated to indemnify the Company for any breach of any of the representations
and warranties and to repurchase any non-conforming Contracts. The Company
generally verifies Dealer compliance with usury laws, but does not audit a
Dealer's full compliance with applicable laws. There is no assurance the Company
will detect all Dealer violations or that individual Dealers will have the
financial ability and resources either to repurchase Contracts or indemnify the
Company against losses. Accordingly, failure by Dealers to comply with
applicable laws, or with their representations and warranties, could have a
material adverse effect on the Company.
The Company believes it is currently in compliance in all material
respects with applicable laws, but there can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to maintain such compliance. The failure to comply with such laws,
or a determination by a court that the Company's interpretation of law was
erroneous, could have a material adverse effect upon the Company. Furthermore,
the adoption of additional laws, changes in the interpretation and enforcement
of current laws or the expansion of the Company's business into jurisdictions
that have adopted more stringent regulatory requirements than those in which the
Company currently conducts business, could have a material adverse effect upon
the Company.
If a borrower defaults on a Contract, the Company as the servicer of
the Contract is entitled to exercise the remedies of a secured party under the
Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC"), which typically includes the right to
repossession by self-help means unless such means would constitute a breach of
peace. The UCC and other state laws regulate repossession and sales of
collateral (A) by requiring reasonable notice to the borrower of (i) the date,
time and place of any public sale of the collateral, (ii) the date after which
any private sale of the collateral may be held and (iii) the borrower's right to
redeem the financed vehicle prior to any such sale; and (B) by providing that
any such sale must be conducted in a commercially reasonable manner. Financed
vehicles repossessed generally are resold by the Company through unaffiliated
wholesale automobile networks or auctions which are attended principally by used
automobile Dealers.
Under the UCC and other laws applicable in most states, a creditor is
entitled, subject to possible prohibitions or limitations, to obtain a
deficiency judgment from a borrower for any deficiency on repossession and
resale of the vehicle securing the unpaid balance of the borrower's installment
contract. Since a deficiency judgment against a borrower would be a personal
judgment for the shortfall, and the defaulting borrower may have very little
capital or few sources of income, in many cases it is not prudent to seek a
deficiency judgment against a borrower or, if one is obtained, it may be settled
at a significant discount.
9
<PAGE> 12
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS
The "Business" section, and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" as well as other sections of this
Form 10-K contain forward looking information under the Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements include statements relating
to the Company's underwriting, purchasing, pricing and collection strategies,
the seasonality of delinquency rates, the relationship of delinquency rates to
charge offs, the factors affecting charge-off levels, the adequacy of estimates
used to determine credit loss allowances, the adequacy of projections used to
calculate gain on sale of Contracts and valuation of ESRs and other financial
instruments, the Company's liquidity and cash requirements, expectations as to
the timing of the release of funds from credit enhancement cash reserves, the
Company's hedging strategies and implicit statements that historical trends will
continue unless otherwise stated. Each of such statements is subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
results discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that might cause
such a difference include, without limitation, the following risk factors:
Credit Risk
The Company specializes in the indirect financing of Contracts for
consumers who typically have had past credit problems (including bankruptcy),
have limited or no credit histories and/or have low incomes. Consequently, a
high credit risk is inherent in the Contracts purchased by the Company. The
performance of Contracts serviced by the Company or purchased in the future may
be directly affected by unemployment trends and other economic factors beyond
the Company's control. These factors could impair the Company's ability to
predict or manage effectively the default rates of its Contracts and could cause
the Company to incur increased operating expenses associated with the servicing
of these Contracts. An increase in delinquencies, default rates or charge-offs
in its Contract portfolio could trigger defaults under the Company's secured
financing facilities and asset securitizations or constitute triggering events
in the asset securitizations. Any such default or triggering event would
increase the restrictions on the Company's access to cash from credit
enhancement cash reserves and adversely affect the Company's cash flow. There is
no assurance that the Company's credit evaluation and collection processes will
prevent excessive defaults or be adequate to maintain existing delinquency or
charge-off rates as the servicing portfolio grows or that the Company will be
able to purchase Contracts with yields commensurate with the portfolio credit
risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Two primary components of the Company's earnings are: (i) net yield on
Contracts, which is the spread between the interest earned on the Contracts in
the Company's portfolio and the interest paid by the Company on the Repurchase
Facility (as defined in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations) and (ii) gain on sale, which is based upon
the spread between the interest earned on the Contracts included in asset-backed
securities and the pass-through rate paid to the investors in these securities.
The Company's net interest income and future gains on sale could be adversely
affected by rising interest rates, because while the interest rates on the
Contracts in the Company's portfolio are fixed, a portion of the Company's cost
of funds is variable. There is no assurance that the Company's cost of funds
will not have an adverse effect on the Company's ability to maintain
profitability.
The Company has adopted a hedging program to mitigate the risk of
reduced income from changes in interest rates during the period after a Contract
is purchased and prior to the time it is sold in an asset-backed security. There
is no assurance that this hedging program will benefit the Company or offset
entirely corresponding losses with respect to Contracts affected by an interest
rate fluctuation; or that the hedging program itself will not cause the Company
to incur losses.
10
<PAGE> 13
Liquidity and Capital Resources
NEGATIVE OPERATING CASH FLOWS. The Company's business requires
substantial cash to support the funding of credit enhancement cash reserves and
issuance costs for its asset securitizations, operating expenses, tax payments
due in recognition of gain on sales of Contracts (for which no cash is received
by the Company at the time of the sale), debt service and other cash
requirements, including, potentially, a portion of the purchase price of the
Contracts. These cash requirements increase as the volume of Contracts purchased
and serviced by the Company increase. Historically, the Company has operated on
negative cash flow and, depending upon the Company's growth of Contract purchase
volumes, the structure of its interim financing facility and its Contract
securitization program, its negative cash flow may continue into the foreseeable
future. The Company has funded its negative operating cash flows principally
through borrowings under the NIM Facility (and the bridge facility retired by
the NIM Facility) and proceeds from the sale of debt and equity securities. In
order to execute its business strategy, the Company is dependent upon the
Repurchase Facility (and the replacement of the Repurchase Facility in 1997 if
the Company elects to exercise its option to terminate), its asset
securitization program, its ongoing ability to access capital markets to obtain
long term debt and equity capital and, possibly, the sale of Subordinated
Securities. Factors that affect the Company's access to capital markets or the
cost of capital include, among others, interest rates, general economic
conditions and the Company's results of operations, financial condition,
business prospects (including competitive conditions), leverage and the
performance of its asset securitizations. In addition, covenants in the
subordinated notes and in future debt securities and financing facilities may
significantly restrict the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness or
issue new equity securities.
DEPENDENCE UPON FINANCING FACILITIES. To date, the Company has financed
its acquisition of Contracts primarily through the Repurchase Facility. Cargill
Financial Services Corp. ("Cargill") finances 100% of the purchase price of the
Contracts under the Repurchase Facility. In January 1997, the Company entered
into an agreement with Cargill modifying the existing repurchase facility
between the Company and Cargill. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company
will have the right, at its option, to terminate the Repurchase Facility at any
time through May 31, 1997, by providing Cargill with 14 days written notice. The
Company intends to exercise this option if a facility with a lower cost of funds
can be found to replace the Repurchase Facility. The Company anticipates that a
replacement facility would limit financing to approximately 93% of the purchase
price of the Contracts. This would require the Company to use cash resources for
a portion of Contract purchases. The Company has also used the proceeds of the
NIM Facility with Cargill to finance credit enhancement and securitization
expenses arising from the issuance of asset-backed securities and for working
capital. A breach under either the Repurchase Facility or the NIM Facility could
prohibit the Company from obtaining financing under both of the facilities.
DEPENDENCE UPON ASSET SECURITIZATIONS. The Company recently has relied
and expects to continue to rely on the issuance of asset-backed securities as a
means of providing long-term, fixed rate financing of Contracts and generating
servicing revenues. Gains from the issuance of these securities are expected to
generate a significant portion of the Company's revenues. The gain on sale,
however, does not generate any cash in the short term and, under its current
structure, is subject to taxation, and thus, contributes to negative cash flow.
The timing of the issuance of any asset-backed security is affected by a number
of factors, some of which are beyond the Company's control, including, among
others, conditions in the asset-backed securities market, interest rates and
approvals from third parties. Some or all of these factors may cause delays in
closing a securitization or may even prevent such transactions entirely.
Further, the Company's asset securitization program could be adversely affected
by the performance of its existing securitizations, any significant changes in
its credit enhancement requirements and/or the loss of its guaranty relationship
with FSA.
Competition and Consolidation of Industry
The automobile financing business, and the non-prime credit segment in
which the Company operates, are highly competitive. The Company competes with a
growing number of publicly and privately held national, regional and local
companies that specialize in non-prime automobile finance. In addition, the
Company competes, or may compete in the future, for business with more
traditional automobile financing sources, such as commercial banks and
automobile manufacturers' captive finance companies. Many of the Company's
competitors and
11
<PAGE> 14
potential competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and other
resources than the Company, and may be more successful in expanding into new
geographic markets, building dealer networks and increasing market share through
internal growth or acquisition. The larger, more established companies have
access to capital markets for unsecured commercial paper, investment-grade
corporate debt instruments and to other funding sources that may provide them
with an advantageous cost of capital relative to the Company's cost of capital.
The non-prime finance segment of the automobile financing industry, which is
currently highly fragmented, may be subject to significant future consolidation.
Geographic Concentration
The Company's Contract purchases currently are concentrated in
California, Texas, Florida and Pennsylvania. As of December 31, 1996, 61% of the
Contracts serviced by ACC were purchased from Dealers in these states. An
economic slowdown or recession, or a change in the regulatory or legal
environment, in one or more of these states could have a material adverse effect
on the performance of the Company's existing Contract portfolio and on its
Contract purchases.
Impact of Government Regulation and Litigation
The Company's business is subject to numerous federal and state
consumer protection laws and regulations which are subject to change. An adverse
change in or interpretation of existing laws or regulations, the promulgation of
any new laws or regulations, or the failure to comply with any of such laws and
regulations could have an adverse effect on the Company's business and its
financial condition.
Given the consumer-oriented nature of the industry, industry
participants are from time to time named as defendants in litigation involving
alleged violations of federal and state consumer protection or other similar
laws and regulations. A judgment against the Company in connection with any
litigation could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition and its results of operations. In addition, if it were determined that
a Dealer failed to comply with applicable laws or a number of Contracts
purchased by the Company involved violations of applicable laws, the Company's
financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. Further, an adverse judgment against a competitor relating to a
standard business practice in the industry could have a material adverse effect
on the non-prime automobile finance industry and on the Company.
Dependence on Key Personnel
The Company is dependent upon its founding executive officers, Rocco J.
Fabiano, Gary S. Burdick and Rellen M. Stewart (the "Founders"). The loss of the
services of one or more of the Founders could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business and there is no assurance that the Company would be able
to replace any of the Founders without incurring additional costs or without
disruptions to the Company. The Company maintains key man life insurance in the
amount of $500,000 on each of the Founders.
The Company's ability to implement its business strategy depends upon
its ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees to
maintain its underwriting standards and collection procedures and to support its
expansion into new geographic markets. There is no assurance that the Company
will be able to recruit and retain such personnel.
Dependence on Dealer Relationships
The Company's ability to expand into new geographic markets and to
maintain or increase its volume of Contract purchases is dependent upon
maintaining and expanding the network of Dealers from which it purchases
Contracts. The Company's loss of any of its RSMs could adversely affect the
Company's relationships with participating Dealers and future purchases of
Contracts. Increased competition, including without limitation, competition from
captive finance companies and other factors, could have an adverse effect on the
Company's ability to maintain or expand its Dealer network.
12
<PAGE> 15
Changes In Market Conditions
The Company's business of financing automobile sales is directly
related to the automobile industry's sales of new and used automobiles.
Automobile sales are cyclical in nature and are affected by general economic
conditions, including employment rates, interest rates, real wages and other
economic conditions. An increase in interest rates, economic slowdown or
recession could adversely affect automobile sales and, in turn, reduce the
number of Contracts available for purchase by automobile finance companies such
as the Company. A change in general economic conditions also could affect
adversely the performance of the portfolio of Contracts owned and serviced by
the Company, including Contracts sold in asset-backed securities.
Reliance on Systems and Controls
The Company depends heavily upon its systems and controls, many of
which are designed specifically for its business. These systems and controls
support the evaluation, acquisition, monitoring, collecting and administering of
the Company's portfolio as well as support general accounting and other
management functions of the Company. There is no assurance that these systems
and controls, including those specially designed and built for the Company, are
adequate or will continue to be adequate to support the Company's growth. A
failure of the automated systems, including a failure of data integrity or
accuracy, could have a material adverse effect upon the Company's business and
financial condition.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had 225 full-time employees. The
Company believes that its relations with its employees are good. The Company is
not a party to any collective bargaining agreement.
ITEM 2. PROPERTY
The Company's headquarters are located in San Diego, California, where
it leases approximately 25,000 rentable square feet of general office space from
unaffiliated lessors. The headquarters leases expire at various times between
January 1998 and March 2002. The base monthly rent for all San Diego properties
leased by the Company is $37,000. The Company has an option to extend most of
the headquarters lease for an additional three years upon terms substantially
similar to those of the existing lease. The Company also leases from
unaffiliated lessors four offices that it uses as regional credit centers,
located in Dallas, Texas; Atlanta, Georgia; Miami, Florida; and Newark,
Delaware. The office in Dallas consists of approximately 2,075 rentable square
feet for which the lease expires January 1, 1998. The base monthly rent is
$2,334. The Company has an option to renew the lease for an additional three
years, on substantially similar terms. The office in Atlanta consists of
approximately 2,100 rentable square feet for which the lease expires January 31,
1998. The monthly rent is $2,481. The office in Miami consists of approximately
1,662 rentable square feet for which the lease expires June 10, 2001. The base
monthly rent is $2,100. The office in Newark consists of approximately 3,414
rentable square feet for which the lease expires April 15, 1999. The base
monthly rent is $5,050.
The Company plans to enter into an agreement to lease new corporate
headquarters space in San Diego, California from an unaffiliated lesser. The
building is currently under construction and the Company is expected to move and
begin paying rent in October 1997. The new office space consists of
approximately 37,000 rentable square feet. The base monthly rent is
approximately $61,000, subject to annual increases. The lease would expire in
October 2005. The Company plans to sublease its existing headquarters office
space which it has outgrown.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of the date of this Form 10-K, the Company is involved as a
defendant in certain litigation and threatened litigation arising in the normal
course of business. While the outcome of the pending and threatened litigation
cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company's management believes that all
pending and threatened claims will be resolved on terms and for amounts that
will not have a material effect on the Company's business or consolidated
financial condition.
13
<PAGE> 16
The Company regularly initiates and intends to continue initiating
legal proceedings as a plaintiff in connection with its routine collection
activities.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
The Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol ACCI. The high, low and daily average bid prices of the common
stock for the year ended December 31, 1996 are listed below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ENDING HIGH LOW AVERAGE
------ ---- --- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter (1) N/A N/A N/A N/A
Second Quarter (1) $ 7.50 $ 9.63 $ 7.25 $ 8.00
Third Quarter .... $ 8.75 $ 9.50 $ 5.63 $ 8.13
Fourth Quarter ... $ 9.63 $10.13 $ 8.38 $ 9.13
</TABLE>
(1) Began trading as a public company on May 17, 1996.
As of March 14, 1997, there were approximately 34 stockholders of record of the
Company's common stock.
14
<PAGE> 17
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth certain summary consolidated financial
information for the Company. The following information as of December 31, 1996,
and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995, the six-month
transition period ended December 31, 1994, and for the period from July 15, 1993
(inception), through June 30, 1994, has been derived from the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements which have been audited by KPMG Peat Marwick
LLP, independent auditors, whose report with respect thereto appears elsewhere
in this Form 10-K. The information as of December 31, 1994, and June 30, 1994,
has been derived from audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
which are not presented herein. The consolidated financial data should be read
in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
thereto and the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations" included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, DEC. 31, DEC. 31, JUNE 30,
1996 1995(1) 1994(1) 1994(1)
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net Interest Income Before
Provision for Contract Losses ..... $ 4,700,124 $ 3,332,354 $ 2,187,843 $ 606,177
Gain on Sale of Contracts ............ 15,186,889 8,056,136 -- --
Servicing Income and Ancillary Fees .. 4,914,668 1,757,257 28,237 6,653
Litigation Settlement Income ......... -- -- 325,000 --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Total Revenues ....................... 24,801,681 13,145,747 2,541,080 612,830
Provision for Contract Losses ..... (1,113,069) (673,802) (902,361) (592,325)
Operating Expenses ................... (14,896,921) (8,796,590) (2,630,925) (2,608,467)
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Income (Loss) Before Taxes ........ 8,791,691 3,675,355 (992,206) (2,587,962)
Income Tax Provision ................. 3,692,000 209,000 -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) .................... $ 5,099,691 $ 3,466,355 $ (992,206) $(2,587,962)
============ ============ =========== ===========
Income per Common Share and Equivalent (2)
Primary .............................. $ 0.68 $ 0.61 $- $-
Fully Diluted ........................ $ 0.67 $ 0.60 $- $-
Weighted-average shares
Primary .............................. 7,542,371 5,661,046 -- --
Fully Diluted ........................ 7,588,476 5,737,258 -- --
Ratio of Earnings to fixed charges(3) .... 2.80 1.84 -- --
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total Assets ................... $64,633,390 $46,908,938 $ 42,331,518 $ 16,819,783
Installment Contracts, Net ...... 24,507,335 28,697,166 38,613,239 14,956,735
Asset-Backed Securities Held-to-
Maturity ...................... -- 3,910,080 -- --
Asset-Backed Securities Available
for Sale ..................... 7,832,174 -- -- --
Excess Servicing Receivables .... 15,573,618 5,590,878 -- --
Repurchase Facility, Net ........ 11,026,130 29,708,252 40,492,594 14,992,610
Long-Term Borrowings ............ 19,528,369 7,959,083 205,919 --
Total Liabilities ............... 40,113,674 40,624,138 41,433,745 15,213,409
Redeemable Preferred Stock ...... -- 6,279,049 4,358,377 4,108,400
Shareholders' Equity ............ 24,519,716 5,751 (3,460,604) (2,502,026)
Return on Average Assets ............ 9.24% 6.92% -- --
Return on Average Equity (4) ........ 30.81% 102.37% -- --
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE> 18
(1) As of January 1, 1995, the Company changed its fiscal year end from June
30 to December 31. Each of the periods ended June 30, 1994, December 31,
1994, and December 31, 1995, is an audited period.
(2) Due to the significant changes in the capital structure of the Company
upon the closing of the initial public offering, historical net income
(loss) per share prior to the year ended December 31, 1995, is not
presented.
(3) For the six-month transition period ended December 31, 1994 and the period
from July 15, 1993 (inception) through June 30, 1994, earnings were not
sufficient to cover fixed charges as the Company recognized a net loss in
both periods.
(4) The calculation of return on average equity for December 31, 1995,
includes redeemable Preferred Stock.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD FROM
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, DEC. 31, DEC. 31, JUNE 30,
1996 1995 1994 1994
-------- -------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA AND CONTRACT PURCHASE DATA
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS):
Average Servicing Portfolio .................. $142,450 $ 44,715 $ -- $ --
Average Unsold Contracts ..................... 34,376 34,222 29,988 3,859
Average Total Servicing Portfolio ............ 176,826 78,937 29,988 3,859
Average Repurchase Facility Balance .......... 37,245 38,216 28,040 3,190
Contracts Sold ............................... 190,760 101,016 -- --
Amount of Contracts Purchased ................ 193,873 98,871 29,380 17,353
Average Coupon on Contracts .................. 20.66% 20.00% 19.88% 20.11%
Average Original Term of
Contracts (Months) ....................... 57 57 55 54
Average Discount on Contracts,
Including Acquisition Fees ............... 4.63% 6.39% 7.72% 8.40%
</TABLE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
From the inception of the Company on July 15, 1993, through April 30,
1995, the primary source of revenue for the Company was net interest income on
the Contracts owned by the Company. In May 1995, the Company initiated an
asset-backed securitization program by which the Company sells its Contracts and
retains subordinate asset-backed securities ("Subordinated Securities") or
performing Contracts pledged as credit enhancements ("Spread Receivables"),
excess servicing receivables ("ESRs") and credit enhancement cash reserves.
Through December 31, 1996, the Company has sold $292 million of Contracts
through asset securitizations. Since initiation of the asset-backed
securitization program, the Company's earnings have been increasingly
attributable to the gains recognized on the sale of the Contracts and servicing
revenues generated in conjunction with servicing those sold Contracts. In
contrast, interest income is expected to be a declining portion of total
revenues.
Until such time as the Contracts are sold in asset-backed securities,
Contracts are pledged as collateral to, and are financed under, a financing
facility ("Repurchase Facility"). Unless terminated prior to May 31, 1997, (See
Footnotes 9 and 19 to the notes to consolidated financial statements) at the
option of the Company, the Repurchase Facility extends through July 15, 1998.
The Company also has the option of pledging the Subordinated Securities, ESRs
and credit enhancement cash reserves for borrowings under a separate financing
facility ("NIM Facility"), which expires in May 1998.
On May 16, 1996, the Company sold, in an initial public offering,
2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock which generated net proceeds of
approximately $12.5 million. The proceeds were used to partially pay-down the
NIM Facility (included in Other Borrowings on the Company's Consolidated Balance
Sheet), temporarily reduce advances on the Repurchase Facility and for other
general corporate purposes. In addition, each share of the Company's redeemable
Preferred Stock automatically converted into 23 shares of Common Stock upon
consummation of the offering. Total cumulative dividends of $574,454 were paid
to the holders of the redeemable Preferred Stock subsequent to the conversion.
On November 18, 1996, the Company issued $20 million of 10.25% subordinated
notes due 2003 (the "Notes") in a public offering which generated net proceeds
of approximately
16
<PAGE> 19
$19.0 million after deducting the underwriting discount and issuance costs. The
proceeds were used to pay-off the outstanding balance of the NIM Facility,
temporarily reduce advances on the Repurchase Facility and for other general
corporate purposes.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Year Ended December 31, 1996, Compared to the Year ended December
31, 1995
During the year ended December 31, 1996, income before taxes increased
139% to $8.8 million. This increase is primarily due to increases in the gain on
sale of Contracts and servicing and ancillary fees totaling $10.3 million which
resulted from an increase in the sale of Contracts and an increase in the
average balance of sold Contracts ("Servicing Portfolio"). During the year ended
December 31, 1996, Contracts sold were $191 million and the average Servicing
Portfolio was $142 million, compared to $101 million sold and an average
Servicing Portfolio of $45 million during the same period in 1995. Partially
offsetting these increases was an increase in operating expenses of $6.1 million
as a result of the Company's expanded purchasing and servicing operations. The
Company reported net income after taxes of $5.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 1996, compared to $3.5 million for the year ended December 31,
1995. Primary net income per common share and common share equivalent was $0.68
per share for the year ended December 31, 1996, based upon a weighted average of
7,542,371 primary shares outstanding, compared to $0.61 per share for the year
ended December 31, 1995, based upon a weighted average of 5,661,046 primary
shares outstanding.
NET INTEREST INCOME. The Company earned approximately $4.7 million of
net interest income during the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to $3.3
million during the year ended December 31, 1995. The principal source of the
Company's net interest income was the net yield on Contracts (yield on Contracts
less the cost of the Repurchase Facility) which amounted to $3.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to $2.9 million during the year ended
December 31, 1995. This increase resulted primarily from a higher yield on
Contracts and a lower rate paid on the Repurchase Facility during the year ended
December 31, 1996, compared to the same period in 1995. The yield on Contracts
increased to 21.4% and the average rate on the Repurchase Facility decreased to
9.2% during the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to 19.3% and 9.7%,
respectively, during the year ended December 31, 1995.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company earned interest
income of $2.0 million on asset-backed securities, cash balances held in
restricted accounts and as credit enhancement cash reserves, compared to
$927,000 during the year ended December 31, 1995. This increase is primarily due
to significant expansion of the asset-backed security program during the year
ended December 31, 1996, as compared to the year earlier.
The Company recognized interest expense on long term borrowings (total
amounts owed in connection with the Notes, the NIM Facility and the lease
liability) of $1.2 million during the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to
$490,000 in the prior year. This increase is primarily due to a higher average
outstanding NIM Facility balance during the year ended December 31, 1996, as
compared to the year ended December 31, 1995. The average balance of the NIM
Facility was $5.3 million and $2.1 million during the years ended December 31,
1996, and 1995, respectively. The average NIM Facility balance increased due to
the Company's growth and cash needs. During the year ended December 31, 1996,
the Company recognized $842,000 of interest expense in connection with the NIM
Facility as compared to $319,000 of interest expense during 1995. Additionally,
during the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company recognized $252,000 of
interest expense in connection with the Notes issued on November 18, 1996.
CONTRACT LOSS PROVISION. The Company recorded a provision for Contract
losses of $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to
$674,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. The allowance for Contract losses
is maintained at a level deemed by management to be adequate to provide for
losses in the held-for-investment portfolio. The provision for 1996 included a
$440,000 loss allowance for Contracts that are ineligible for sale due to
delinquency status as well as a $125,000 allowance for losses for the Spread
Receivables, which, although performing, are deemed held-for investment. The
1995 provision related only to delinquent Contracts and included a provision of
$1.1 million and a one-time recapture of $440,000 from the allowance for
Contract losses provided for in a prior period on Contracts sold in conjunction
with the 1995-A Transaction.
17
<PAGE> 20
SERVICING REVENUES. The Company recorded $4.9 million of servicing and
ancillary fees for the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to $1.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 1995. This substantial increase in servicing
revenues arose from an increase in the average size of the Servicing Portfolio
to $142 million during the year ended December 31, 1996, as compared to $45
million during the same period in 1995. Until the completion of the 1995-A
Transaction in May 1995, the Company did not service Contracts for others and
recognized no servicing revenue other than ancillary fees. Future servicing
revenues could be adversely affected if the level of charge-offs and prepayments
in any pool of Contracts sold exceeds the Company's estimate of such levels at
the time of the sale of such Contracts in asset-backed securities.
GAIN ON THE SALE OF CONTRACTS. The Company recognized a gain on sale of
Contracts of $15.2 million during the year ended December 31, 1996, representing
approximately 8% of the $191 million of Contracts sold in connection with the
1996-A Transaction, 1996-B Transaction, 1996-C Transaction and 1996-D
Transaction, compared to $8.1 million, or approximately 8% of the $101 million
of Contracts sold in connection with the 1995-A Transaction and 1995-B
Transaction in the year ended December 31, 1995. (See Footnote 1(i) of the notes
to consolidated financial statements for the methodology used to calculate the
gain on sale.)
OPERATING EXPENSES. The Company reported operating expenses of $14.9
million during the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to $8.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 1995. The increase in expenses reflected the growth
in the amount of Contracts purchased and serviced by the Company. The operating
expense ratio (annualized operating expenses as a percentage of average
Contracts owned and serviced) improved to 8.4% for the year ended December 31,
1996, from 10.7% during the year ended December 31, 1995.
Personnel expenses for the year ended December 31, 1996, were $8.3
million, compared to $5.3 million during the year ended December 31, 1995.
Personnel expenses consisted primarily of salaries and wages, performance
incentives, employee benefits and payroll taxes. The overall increase in
personnel expenses reflected the growth of the Company's full-time employees
from 139 as of December 31, 1995, to 225 as of December 31, 1996. The Company
expects that its number of full-time employees will continue to increase
commensurate with the growth of the Company's servicing portfolio.
The Company's general and administrative expenses increased to $3.8
million for the year ended December 31, 1996, from $2.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 1995. These expenses consisted primarily of
telecommunications expenses, travel expenses, marketing expenses, professional
fees, insurance expenses, credit bureau expenses and management information
systems expenses. The increase in general and administrative expenses reflected
the substantial expansion of the Company's operations.
Servicing expenses increased to $1.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 1996, compared to $408,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995,
due to the substantial growth of the total Contracts owned and serviced. These
expenses consisted primarily of out-of-pocket collection, repossession and
liquidation expenses.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased to $521,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1996, from $372,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. The
increase in occupancy and equipment expenses reflected the expansion of the
Company's headquarters office space and its regional operations since December
31, 1995. The Company expects its occupancy expenses to continue to increase as
the Company expands its headquarters facility to accommodate the expansion of
the Company's operations.
INCOME TAXES. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the effective tax
rate was 42%, compared to 5.7% for the year ended December 31, 1995. The low
effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 1995, was due to the reversal
of the valuation allowance on gross deferred tax assets of $1.4 million during
the year ended.
The Year Ended December 31, 1995, Compared to the Six-Month Transition
Period Ended December 31, 1994, and the Period from July 15, 1993, (inception)
through June 30, 1994
At the inception of the Company on July 15, 1993, the Company adopted a
fiscal year end of June 30. The Company's initial fiscal year ended June 30,
1994 ("Initial Fiscal Year"). On January 23, 1996, the Company elected to change
its fiscal year end to December 31, with the change effective as of January 1,
1995. The purpose
18
<PAGE> 21
of this change was to conform the Company's fiscal year to the fiscal year
adopted by its primary competitors. As a result of the change in fiscal year
end, the transition period from July 1, 1994, through December 31, 1994,
("Transition Period") constitutes an audited period. Neither the actual results
of the Transition Period nor the annualized results of the Transition Period are
indicative of the results that would have been achieved in a 12-month fiscal
year.
The Company reported net income of $3.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 1995, compared to net losses of $992,000 for the Transition Period
and $2.6 million for the Initial Fiscal Year. The Company's purchasing and
servicing operations expanded significantly during the year ended December 31,
1995, compared to the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year. During the
year ended December 31, 1995, the Company sold $101 million of Contracts in
asset-backed securities and recognized an $8.1 million gain on the sale of such
Contracts. The Company did not sell Contracts during the Transition Period or
the Initial Fiscal Year.
NET INTEREST INCOME. The Company generated approximately $3.3 million
of net interest income during the year ended December 31, 1995, compared to $2.2
million in the Transition Period and $606,000 in the Initial Fiscal Year. The
principal source of the Company's net interest income was the net yield on
Contracts, which amounted to $2.9 million during the year ended December 31,
1995 compared to $2.2 million during the Transition Period and $557,000 during
the Initial Fiscal Year.
During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Company recognized
interest income of $114,000 from discount amortization, compared to $424,000
during the Transition Period and $96,000 during the Initial Fiscal Year. As of
January 1, 1995, the Company deemed all of its Contracts to be held-for-sale,
except Contracts which were 31 days or more delinquent. Thereafter, the Company
discontinued the amortization of the purchase discounts, except in the case of
Contract payoffs.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 1995, the Company
earned interest income of $927,000 on asset-backed securities and cash balances
held in restricted accounts, and paid interest of $490,000 on other borrowings.
CONTRACT LOSS PROVISION. The Company recorded a provision for Contract
losses of $674,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995, compared to $902,000
for the Transition Period and $592,000 for the Initial Fiscal Year. The
allowance for Contract losses is maintained at a level deemed by management to
be adequate to provide for losses in the held-for-investment portfolio.
SERVICING REVENUES. The Company recorded $1.8 million of servicing and
ancillary fees during the year ended December 31, 1995, compared to $28,000 for
the Transition Period and $7,000 for the Initial Fiscal Year. The substantial
increase in servicing revenues in the year ended December 31, 1995, arose from
eight months of servicing on the 1995-A Transaction and four months of servicing
on the 1995-B Transaction. Since the Company had not yet sold any Contracts in
asset-backed securities in the Transition Period or the Initial Fiscal Year, the
Company's servicing revenues were limited to ancillary fees during those
periods.
GAIN ON THE SALE OF CONTRACTS. The Company recognized a gain on sale of
$8.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1995, representing 8.0% of the
principal amount of $101 million in Contracts sold in the 1995-A Transaction and
the 1995-B Transaction. There were no such transactions in the Transition Period
or in the Initial Fiscal Year. (See Footnote 1(i) of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for the methodology used to calculate the gain on sale.)
LITIGATION SETTLEMENT INCOME. During the Transition Period, the Company
received a payment of $325,000 in connection with the settlement of litigation.
Management does not expect this source of income to be recurring.
OPERATING EXPENSES. The Company reported operating expenses of $8.8
million during the year ended December 31, 1995, compared to $2.6 million for
the Transition Period and $2.6 million for the Initial Fiscal Year. The increase
in expenses reflected the growth in the amount of Contracts purchased and
serviced by the Company.
19
<PAGE> 22
The operating expense ratio improved to 10.7% for the year ended December 31,
1995, from 16.4% for the Transition Period and 82.6% for the Initial Fiscal
Year.
Personnel expenses for the year ended December 31, 1995, were $5.3
million, compared to $1.7 million for the Transition Period and $1.9 million for
the Initial Fiscal Year. The increase in personnel expenses reflected the growth
of the Company's full-time employees from 64 as of June 30, 1994, to 82 as of
December 31, 1994, and 139 as of December 31, 1995.
The Company's general and administrative expenses increased to $2.4
million for the year ended December 31, 1995, from $701,000 for the Transition
Period and $493,000 for the Initial Fiscal Year. These expenses consisted
primarily of telecommunications expenses, travel expenses, marketing expenses,
professional fees, insurance expenses, credit bureau expenses and management
information systems expenses. The increase in general and administrative
expenses reflected the substantial growth of the Company.
Servicing expenses increased to $408,000 for the year ended December
31, 1995, as compared to $56,000 for the Transition Period. The increase in
servicing expenses is due to the substantial growth of the portfolio of owned
and sold Contracts. Due to the low collection and repossession activity
experienced by the Company during the Initial Fiscal Year, the Company incurred
no servicing expenses.
Occupancy and equipment expenses increased to $372,000 for the year
ended December 31, 1995, from $101,000 for the Transition Period and $101,000
for the Initial Fiscal Year. The increase in occupancy and equipment expenses
generally reflected growth in the activity of the Company. More specifically,
the Company significantly expanded its headquarters office space and its
regional operations since December 31, 1994.
INCOME TAXES. For the year ended December 31, 1995, representing the
Company's first year of earnings, the effective tax rate was 5.7% compared to
zero for the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year. This low effective
tax rate for the year ended December 31, 1995, was due to the reversal of the
valuation allowance on gross deferred tax assets of $1.4 million during the
year.
CREDIT PERFORMANCE
The tables below provide the Company's historic delinquency experience
and net charge-off experience with respect to its entire contract portfolio,
which includes Contracts owned by the Company and Contracts sold in asset-backed
securities, at the dates, and for the periods, indicated. All amounts and
percentages are based on the full amount remaining to be repaid on each
Contract, net of any unearned finance charges.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DELINQUENCY EXPERIENCE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MAR. 31, DEC. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Gross Servicing Portfolio (000s) . $251,751 $209,761 $172,562 $139,969 $117,539
Period of Delinquencies (000s)(1):
31-60 Days ....................... 8,323 6,234 4,827 2,256 3,217
61-90 Days ....................... 2,847 1,832 1,347 1,010 1,171
91 Days .......................... 1,516 1,088 662 561 608
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Delinquencies (000s) ......... $ 12,686 $ 9,154 $ 6,836 $ 3,827 $ 4,996
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Total Delinquencies as a
Percentage of
Servicing Portfolio .............. 5.04% 4.36% 3.96% 2.73% 4.25%
Amount in Repossession (000's) (2) $ 2,216 $ 1,685 $ 1,369 $ 1,130 $ 861
Amount in Repossession as a
Percentage of Servicing
Portfolio ........................ 0.88% 0.80% 0.79% 0.81% 0.73%
</TABLE>
20
<PAGE> 23
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET CHARGE-OFF EXPERIENCE
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MAR. 31, DEC. 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Average Servicing Portfolio
Outstanding (000s) (3) ....... $232,617 $191,162 $156,266 $128,754 $108,784
Net Charge-offs (000s) (4)(5) .... $ 2,945 $ 2,227 $ 1,329 $ 1,417 $ 1,233
Annualized Net Charge-offs as a
Percentage of Average Servicing
Portfolio ..................... 5.06% 4.66% 3.40% 4.40% 4.53%
</TABLE>
(1) The Company considers a Contract delinquent when an obligor fails to make
at least 90% of the contractual payment by the stated due date. The
period of delinquency is based upon the number of days payments are
contractually past due. Contracts not yet 31 days past due are not
considered to be delinquent. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had
granted payment extensions of 30 days or more for Contracts representing
1.45% of the outstanding balance of the entire contract portfolio, and
these contracts were not considered delinquent.
(2) Amount in repossession represents the outstanding principal on Contracts
for which vehicles have been repossessed, but not yet liquidated.
(3) For the three-month period ended December 31, 1996, average of
receivables outstanding as of the beginning and the end of each month
during the period. For prior periods, average of receivables outstanding
as of the beginning and the end of the period presented.
(4) Charge-off amounts exclude the effect of accrued interest, discounts paid
by the dealers and potential recoveries from legal proceedings against
borrowers.
(5) Net charge-offs are net of recoveries and include the remaining Contract
balance at time of charge-off. In the case of repossession, net
charge-offs include the remaining Contract balance at the time of
repossession less liquidation proceeds (for disposed vehicles), NADA
wholesale value (for vehicles repossessed but not sold) or claims
receivable under the Company's VSI insurance. Net charge-offs do not
include repossessions that are less than 120 days delinquent and are not
yet charged-off.
The management of the Company believes that the payment practices of
its borrowers are partially a function of the time of year. Since these
borrowers typically have low disposable incomes, they tend with more frequency
to become late in payments on their Contracts during the fall and early winter
months, when the holiday season generates competing demands for their limited
disposable income and when these borrowers encounter weather-related work
slow-downs. As a result, if all other factors are equal, management expects
delinquencies to be highest in the fourth calendar quarter. Due to the 60-120
day lag between initial delinquency and charge-off, management expects these
seasonal factors to cause charge-offs to be highest in the fourth and first
calendar quarters. The increase in charge-offs during the three-month period
ended December 31, 1996, as compared to the three-month period ended December
31, 1995, is primarily due to the seasoning of the total Contract portfolio.
Since January 1, 1995, the Company has maintained, at its own expense,
vendor single interest ("VSI") insurance that protects the Company's interest in
the collateral against uninsured physical damaged (including total loss) and
skips. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's recoveries on its VSI
insurance reduced its net charge-offs (including Contracts owned and sold) by
$923,000 and the total premiums paid by the Company were $766,000. For the year
ended December 31, 1995, the Company's recoveries on its VSI insurance reduced
its net charge-offs by $410,000 and the total premiums paid by the Company were
$198,000. Commencing January 1, 1997, VSI insurance will be provided by a new
carrier. The terms of this new policy are almost identical in nature except that
losses due to skips will no longer be covered. Historically, most skips have
been located either by the Company or by the VSI insurance provider, and the
Company believes that it can internally manage skips more efficiently.
ALLOWANCE FOR CONTRACT LOSSES
The Company maintains an allowance for losses on Contracts that are
held-for-investment. The Company determines an allowance for Contract losses
based on an estimate of the losses inherent in the held-for-investment
portfolio, including estimates of the frequency of defaults for various
delinquency ranges and the expected average severity of losses on these
defaults. As of December 31, 1996, in addition to delinquent Contracts,
Contracts held-
21
<PAGE> 24
for-investment included approximately $2.9 million of Spread Receivables pledged
as additional credit enhancement in connection with the 1996-D Transaction. The
allowance for Contract losses as of December 31, 1996, for both delinquent
Contracts and the Spread Receivables was $565,000, or 14% of the Contracts
held-for-investment. As of December 31, 1996, the allowance for Contract losses
as a percentage of delinquent Contracts was 46%. As of December 31, 1995,
Contracts held-for-investment was entirely composed of Contracts that were
ineligible for sale due to delinquency status and the allowance for Contract
losses was $477,000, or 46% of delinquent Contracts.
In connection with the valuation of the ESRs, the Company projects
losses in the pool of Contracts which effectively represents the estimated
undiscounted recourse loss allowance contained within the valuation of the ESRs.
As of December 31, 1996, the estimated undiscounted recourse loss allowance
embedded in the ESRs (excluding accrued interest) was $19.2 million. The
combined allowance for losses on Contracts held-for-investment and the recourse
loss allowance embedded in the ESRs was 7.9% of the Contracts owned and serviced
as of December 31, 1996, as compared to 6.4% at December 31, 1995.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
To date, the Company's financing needs have been primarily driven by
two factors. First, the Company requires working capital to fund its operating
expenses because the net interest income earned on the Contracts owned by the
Company is restricted and not available for general operating purposes. Second,
the securitization program is capital intensive as the Company must fund credit
enhancement and securitization expenses. The Company expects to have an ongoing
need for cash to support operations, Contract purchases and the securitization
program. ACC's only substantial source of cash comes from fees generated from
servicing Contracts pledged to Cargill in conjunction with the Repurchase
Facility and Contracts sold in asset-backed securities. Because ACC is
responsible for virtually all operating expenses, ACC regularly requires cash
infusions from its subsidiaries to fund operating expenses and to service ACC's
indebtedness. These cash infusions are recognized as intercompany loans and are
eliminated during consolidation of the financial statements of the Company.
To date, the Company has financed its acquisition of Contracts
primarily through the Repurchase Facility. Cargill finances 100% of the purchase
price of the Contracts under the Repurchase Facility. In January 1997, the
Company entered into an agreement with Cargill granting the Company the option
to terminate the Repurchase Facility at any time through May 31, 1997, by
providing Cargill with 14 days' written notice and retiring the outstanding
balance of the facility. In exchange for the option, the Company issued to
Cargill 174,500 shares of unregistered Common Stock with a fair value of $10.88
per share as of the date of issuance. If the Company does not exercise the
option, then the fair value of the shares will be credited against future
repurchase fees that became payable under the Repurchase Facility. The Company
intends to exercise this option if a commercial paper or other facility with a
lower cost of funds can be found to replace the Repurchase Facility. The Company
anticipates that a replacement commercial paper facility would limit financing
to approximately 93% of the purchase price of the Contracts. This would require
the Company to use cash resources to fund a portion of Contract purchases. The
Company has also used the proceeds of the NIM Facility (a collateralized
facility with a maximum borrowing base of $10 million, with interest at LIBOR
plus 7%) and the proceeds from the sale of the equity and debt securities to
finance credit enhancement and securitization expenses arising from the issuance
of asset-backed securities and for working capital. A breach under either the
Repurchase Facility (or a replacement facility) or the NIM Facility could
prohibit the Company from obtaining financing under both of the facilities.
The Company's business requires substantial cash to support the funding
of credit enhancement cash reserves and issuance costs for its asset
securitizations, operating expenses, tax payments due under the asset
securitization structure used for the six securitizations completed through
December 31, 1996, in recognition of gain on sales of Contracts (for which no
cash is received by the Company at the time of the sale), debt service and other
cash requirements, including, potentially, a portion of the purchase price of
the Contracts. These cash requirements increase as the volume of Contracts
purchased and serviced by the Company increase. Historically, the Company has
operated on negative cash flow and, depending upon the Company's growth of
Contract purchase volumes and its Contract securitization program, its negative
cash flow may continue into the foreseeable future. The Company has funded its
negative operating cash flows principally through borrowings under the NIM
Facility (and the bridge facility retired by the NIM Facility), proceeds from
the Notes and from the sale of equity securities. In order to
22
<PAGE> 25
execute its business strategy, the Company is dependent upon the Repurchase
Facility (and the replacement of the Repurchase Facility in 1997 if the Company
elects to exercise its option to terminate), its asset securitization program,
its ongoing ability to access capital markets to obtain long term debt and
equity capital and, possibly, the sale of Subordinated Securities (reclassified
as available-for-sale as of December 31, 1996). Factors that affect the
Company's access to capital markets or the cost of capital include, among
others, interest rates, general economic conditions and the Company's results of
operations, financial condition, business prospects (including competitive
conditions), leverage and the performance of its asset securitizations. In
addition, covenants in the indenture for the Notes and in future debt securities
and financing facilities may significantly restrict the Company's ability to
incur additional indebtedness or issue new equity securities.
During the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995, cash generated from
payments received on Contracts financed under the Repurchase Facility was used
to reduce indebtedness under, or was deposited into restricted accounts as
additional collateral for, the Repurchase Facility. Proceeds from the
securitization of Contracts were also used by the Company to reduce indebtedness
under the Repurchase Facility. Following each of the asset securitization
transactions, excess servicing cash flows were deposited into restricted
accounts to build credit enhancements. Once the amounts in these credit
enhancement cash reserves reach required levels, any additional excess servicing
revenues are distributed to the Company. Under normal circumstances, the Company
expects to meet required levels eight to 12 months following the effective date
of a securitization. However, there is no assurance that this expectation will
be met and the occurrence of any triggering event would delay release of excess
cash by increasing credit enhancement cash reserve requirements on those
transactions. As of the date of this document, a trigger event has occurred in
both the 1995-B Transaction and the 1996-A Transaction and the triggers have not
been waived.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company used net cash from
operations of $8.8 million, compared to net cash provided by operations of
$771,000 during the year ended December 31, 1995. The decrease in cash provided
by operations was primarily due to a net decrease in cash from the acquisition
and sale of Contracts held-for-sale of $8.4 million. The Company owned Contracts
of $26 million as of December 31, 1996, compared to $29 million as of December
31, 1995. The Company sold $191 million of Contracts and acquired $194 million
of Contracts in the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to the sale of $101
million of Contracts and the acquisition of $99 million of Contracts in the year
ended December 31, 1995. Additionally, the Company deposited $4.8 million into
restricted cash accounts and in credit enhancement cash reserves during the year
ended December 31, 1996, as compared to $3.2 million during the same period in
1995. The net cash used by operations in the Transition Period and the Initial
Fiscal Year was $1.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The increase in net
cash provided by operations in the year ending December 31, 1995, as compared to
the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year was primarily due to the
income associated with the sale and servicing of Contracts in the 1995-A
Transaction and 1995-B Transaction. Prior to 1995 the Company's sole source of
servicing income was ancillary fees and, as the Company had made no loan sales,
there was no excess servicing income.
The net cash provided by investing activities was $2.6 million during
the year ended December 31, 1996, compared net cash used of $808,000 in the year
ended December 31, 1995. This increase in cash provided was primarily due to
income associated with a larger portfolio of asset-backed securities, as well as
a smaller balance of Contracts held-for-investment during the year ended
December 31, 1996, as compared to the year ended December 31, 1995. The cash
used in investing activities was $24.5 million and $16.1 million during the
Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year, respectively. The decrease in
cash used by investing activities during the year ending December 31, 1995,
compared to the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year, was the result of
the classification of the Contracts to a held-for-sale status during the quarter
ended March 31, 1995.
The net cash provided by financing activities was $7.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 1996, compared to net cash provided of $14,000 during
the year ended December 31, 1995. Increases in cash provided by financing
activities were primarily the result of the following 1996 transactions: $12.5
million raised in the Company's initial public equity offering, $19.0 million
raised in the Company's Notes offering and $1.0 million from the issuance of
redeemable Preferred Stock. Significantly offsetting these increases were
increases in total amounts paid to reduce the Repurchase Facility and NIM
Facility (included in other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets) in
the year ended December 31, 1996, compared to the year ended December 31, 1995.
The
23
<PAGE> 26
Company used net cash to reduce the total outstanding balance of these
facilities of $26.4 million in 1996, compared $3.5 million in 1995. The net cash
provided by financing activities for the Transition Period and the Initial
Fiscal Year was $26.2 million and $19.6 million, respectively, essentially all
of which was due to increases in the Repurchase Facility.
The Company anticipates that funds available under the Repurchase
Facility (or the replacement facility), proceeds from the sale of Subordinated
Securities and borrowings under the NIM Facility will be sufficient to satisfy
the Company's estimated cash requirements for the next 12 months. If these funds
are not available for any reason or if the Company's cash requirements increase,
the Company may be required to seek additional funding.
The Company does not anticipate any need for significant capital
expenditures in connection with its new corporate headquarters facility (due to
the inclusion of tenant improvements in base rent) or in connection with its
management information systems in the next 12 months.
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
The Company maintains an ongoing hedging program for the purpose of
mitigating the potential impact of changing interest rates on the gain on the
sale of Contracts. The hedging strategy is implemented through the forward sale
of two-year Treasury notes or futures Contracts on two-year Treasury
instruments, with Cargill acting as the counterparty to these hedging
transactions. Gains and losses on the hedging program are recorded as an
adjustment to the accounting basis of the Contracts until such time that the
Contracts are sold. At the time of sale, the previously unrealized gains or
losses are recognized as an adjustment to the gain on the sale of the Contracts.
The market value of these futures contracts responds inversely to
changes in the value of the Contracts. The Company recognized net gains on the
hedging program of $206,000 during the year ended December 31, 1996, as compared
to net losses of $927,000 during the year ended December 31, 1995. As of
December 31, 1996, and December 31, 1995, the Company had unrealized losses
under the hedging program of $30,000 and $225,000, respectively.
The Company began actively using the hedging program in January 1995
and the extent to which the Contracts held by the Company are hedged has varied
and will continue to vary from time to time, depending upon prevailing interest
rates and other economic factors. The Company may choose not to maintain the
hedging program based on management's assessment of interest rate risk and the
costs associated with the hedging program.
At any point in time, the portfolio may be partially or fully hedged.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company owned $22 million of Contracts (excluding
approximately $3 million of performing Contracts pledged as credit enhancements)
and maintained a $15 million hedge position.
24
<PAGE> 27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ACC Consumer
Finance Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the
six-month transition period ended December 31, 1994 and the period from July 15,
1993 (inception) through June 30, 1994. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ACC Consumer Finance
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996
and 1995, the six-month transition period ended December 31, 1994 and the period
from July 15, 1993 (inception) through June 30, 1994, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Diego, California
January 26, 1997
25
<PAGE> 28
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1996 1995
----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalent .......................................... $ 1,101,598 $ 120,672
Restricted Cash ................................................... 1,561,293 1,032,683
Credit Enhancement Cash Reserves .................................. 8,353,180 4,052,524
Installment Contracts Held-for-Sale, Net .......................... 21,078,692 28,187,778
Installment Contracts Held-for-Investment, Net .................... 3,428,643 509,388
Asset-Backed Securities Held-to-Maturity .......................... -- 3,910,080
Asset-Backed Securities Available-for-Sale ........................ 7,832,174 --
Excess Servicing Receivables ...................................... 15,573,618 5,590,878
Accounts Receivable ............................................... 3,229,933 1,423,112
Interest Receivable ............................................... 324,889 386,673
Fixed Assets, Net ................................................. 1,140,525 842,016
Repossessed Vehicles .............................................. 297,565 211,619
Prepaid Expenses .................................................. 394,571 427,456
Other Assets ...................................................... 316,709 214,059
----------- ------------
Total Assets ................................................. $64,633,390 $ 46,908,938
=========== ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Repurchase Facility, Net .......................................... $11,026,130 $ 29,708,252
Subordinated Notes, Net ........................................... 19,196,110 --
Other Borrowings .................................................. -- 7,439,597
Amount Due to Bank ................................................ 3,070,453 1,537,290
Lease Liability ................................................... 332,259 519,486
Tax Liability ..................................................... 3,305,287 123,909
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities .......................... 3,183,435 1,295,604
----------- ------------
Total Liabilities ............................................ 40,113,674 40,624,138
Redeemable Preferred Stock:
$.001 Par Value, Authorized 182,282 Shares
Series A : 162,831 Shares Issued and
Outstanding at December 31, 1995
Series B : 11,538 Shares Issued and Outstanding
at December 31, 1995
Series C: No Shares Issued and Outstanding at December 31, 1995
Total Redeemable Preferred Stock ............................. -- 6,279,049
Shareholders' Equity:
Preferred Stock, $.001 Par Value, 1,817,718 Shares
authorized and No Shares Issued and Outstanding .......... -- --
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value, Authorized 18,000,000,
8,292,478 and 2,099,992 Shares Issued and Outstanding as
of December 31, 1996, and 1995, Respectively ............. 8,292 2,100
Additional Paid-in Capital ..................................... 19,931,825 117,464
Unrealized Gain on Asset-Backed Securities, Net ................ 168,175 --
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) ........................ 4,411,424 (113,813)
----------- ------------
Total Shareholders' Equity ................................... 24,519,716 5,751
Commitments and Contingencies
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity ................... $64,633,390 $ 46,908,938
=========== ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
<PAGE> 29
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Income
Interest Income ...................... $ 9,311,087 $ 7,531,690 $ 3,496,763 $ 811,516
Interest Expense ..................... (4,610,963) (4,199,336) (1,308,920) (205,339)
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Interest Income ............... 4,700,124 3,332,354 2,187,843 606,177
Contract Losses
Provision for Contract Losses ........ (1,113,069) (673,802) (902,361) (592,325)
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Interest Income after Provision
for Contract Losses ........... 3,587,055 2,658,552 1,285,482 13,852
Other Income
Servicing and Ancillary Fees ......... 4,914,668 1,757,257 28,237 6,653
Litigation Settlement Income ......... -- -- 325,000 --
Gain on Sale of Contracts ............ 15,186,889 8,056,136 -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Total Other Income ................ 20,101,557 9,813,393 353,237 6,653
Total Income ...................... 23,688,612 12,471,945 1,638,719 20,505
Expenses
Personnel ............................ 8,276,196 5,280,161 1,691,212 1,924,588
General and Administrative ........... 3,835,635 2,449,217 701,366 493,056
Servicing ............................ 1,788,156 408,231 56,299 --
Occupancy and Equipment .............. 520,505 372,254 101,333 100,779
Depreciation and Amortization ........ 476,429 286,727 80,715 90,044
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Total Expenses .................... 14,896,921 8,796,590 2,630,925 2,608,467
Income (Loss) Before Taxes ........ 8,791,691 3,675,355 (992,206) (2,587,962)
Income Tax Provision .............. 3,692,000 209,000 -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) ................. $ 5,099,691 $ 3,466,355 $ (992,206) $(2,587,962)
============ ============ =========== ===========
Preferred Stock Dividends .................... 123,741 215,419 82,621 152,673
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
Shareholders ......................... $ 4,975,950 $ 3,250,936 $(1,074,827) $(2,740,635)
============ ============ =========== ===========
Net Income per Common Share and
Common Share Equivalent:
Primary .................................. $ 0.68 $ 0.61 $ - $ -
Fully Diluted ............................ $ 0.67 $ 0.60 $ - $ -
Shares Used in Computing Net Income
Per Common Share and Common Share
Equivalent:
Primary .................................. 7,542,371 5,661,046 -- --
Fully Diluted ............................ 7,588,476 5,737,258 -- --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
<PAGE> 30
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NOTES UNREALIZED RETAINED
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL RECEIVABLE GAIN ON EARNINGS
---------------------- PAID-IN FROM ASSET-BACKED (ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL SHAREHOLDERS SECURITIES, NET DEFICIT)
--------- ------ ----------- ------------ --------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at July 15, 1993 ......... -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
(Inception)
Issuance of Common Stock ....... 2,099,992 2,100 117,464 -- -- --
Issuance of Notes Receivable ..
from Shareholders ......... -- -- -- (33,628) -- --
Net Loss ....................... -- -- -- -- -- (2,587,962)
--------- ------ ----------- -------- -------- -----------
Balance at June 30, 1994 ......... 2,099,992 2,100 117,464 (33,628) -- (2,587,962)
Payment on Notes Receivable
from Shareholders ......... -- -- -- 33,628 -- --
Net Loss ....................... -- -- -- -- -- (992,206)
--------- ------ ----------- -------- -------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1994 ..... 2,099,992 2,100 117,464 -- -- (3,580,168)
Net Income ..................... -- -- -- -- -- 3,466,355
--------- ------ ----------- -------- -------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1995 ..... 2,099,992 2,100 117,464 -- -- (113,813)
Issuance of Common Stock, Net .. 2,000,000 2,000 12,538,509 -- -- --
Non-cash Conversion of Preferred -- -- -- -- -- --
Stock to Common Stock ..... 4,192,486 4,192 7,275,852 -- -- --
Net Income ..................... -- -- -- -- -- 5,099,691
Payment of Preferred Stock
Dividends ................. -- -- -- -- -- (574,454)
Unrealized Gain on Asset-Backed
Securities, Net .......... -- -- -- -- 168,175 --
--------- ------ ----------- -------- -------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1996 ..... 8,292,478 $8,292 $19,931,825 $ -- $168,175 $ 4,411,424
========= ====== =========== ======== ======== ===========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
<PAGE> 31
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss) ....................... $ 5,099,691 $ 3,466,355 $ (992,206) $ (2,587,962)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income
(Loss) to Net Cash (Used In) Provided By
Operating Activities:
Gain on Sale of Contracts ........... (15,186,889) (8,056,136) -- --
Amortization and Depreciation ....... 5,247,702 2,382,908 (289,041) 26,548
Provision for Contract Losses ....... 1,113,069 673,802 902,361 592,325
Provision for Deferred Income
Taxes, Net ...................... 1,765,000 174,000 -- --
Net Cash Deposited into
Restricted Accounts ............ (4,829,266) (3,166,292) (1,245,225) (673,689)
Deferred Acquisition Expenses ....... (1,778,750) (911,027) (248,874) (138,772)
Changes in Operating Assets:
Net (Increase) Decrease in
Contracts Held-for-Sale ........ (1,522,079) 6,919,206 -- --
Interest Receivable ................. 61,784 192,896 (402,845) (176,723)
Accounts Receivable ................. (1,806,821) (1,307,343) 357,338 (473,107)
Other Assets ........................ (132,421) (43,144) (52,468) (177,177)
Prepaid Expenses .................... 32,885 (354,052) (60,234) (13,170)
Changes in Operating Liabilities:
Accounts Payable and Accrued
Liabilities .................... 3,182,426 800,213 282,653 162,647
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By
Operating Activities ........... (8,753,669) 771,386 (1,748,541) (3,459,080)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net Increase in Contracts Held-for-
Investment ............................ (1,021,867) (2,617,056) (24,364,384) (15,314,261)
Principal Paydowns of Asset-Backed
Securities ............................ 2,582,842 710,880 -- --
Fees for Arranging Financing Facility .. -- -- -- (360,000)
Proceeds from Liquidation of
Repossessed Vehicles .................. 1,835,401 1,706,800 244,000 --
Purchases of Fixed Assets, Net .......... (745,167) (609,094) (224,762) (399,750)
------------ ----------- ------------ ------------
Net Cash Provided By (Used In)
Investing Activities ........... $ 2,651,209 $ (808,470) $(24,345,146) $(16,074,011)
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
29
<PAGE> 32
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED DEC. YEAR ENDED DEC. PERIOD ENDED THROUGH JUNE
31, 1996 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1994 30, 1994
------------ ------------ ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net Proceeds from Issuance of
Subordinated Notes ......................... $ 19,183,447 $ -- $ -- $ --
Net (Decrease) Increase in
Repurchase Facility ........................ (18,806,062) (10,907,271) 25,476,742 15,448,076
Proceeds from Other Borrowings ............... 7,906,396 9,939,597 -- --
Repayment of Other Borrowings ................ (15,513,381) (2,500,000) -- --
Net (Decrease) Increase in Capital
Leases ..................................... (187,227) 313,567 205,919
Increase in Amount Due to Bank ............... 1,533,163 1,247,358 232,780 57,153
Payment on Notes Receivable from
Shareholders ............................... -- -- 33,628 --
Net Proceeds from Issuance of ................ -- -- -- --
Common Stock ............................... 12,540,509 -- -- 85,936
Net Proceeds from Issuance of
Preferred Stock ............................ 1,000,995 1,920,672 249,977 3,980,400
Payment of Preferred Stock Dividends ......... (574,454) -- -- --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Net Cash Provided By
Financing Activities .................... 7,083,386 13,923 26,199,046 19,571,565
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and
Cash Equivalents ................................. 980,926 (23,161) 105,359 38,474
Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of Period .............................. 120,672 143,833 38,474 --
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period ........... $ 1,101,598 $ 120,672 $ 143,833 $ 38,474
============ ============ =========== ===========
Supplemental Disclosure:
Interest Paid .................................... $ 4,078,069 $ 4,073,177 $ 1,038,586 $ 97,839
Taxes Paid ....................................... $ 632,405 $ -- $ -- $ --
Non-Cash Conversion of Preferred Stock ........... $ 7,280,044 $ -- $ -- $ --
Non-Cash Issuance of Common Stock in
Exchange for Notes Receivable ................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 33,628
Non-Cash Issuance of Warrants in
Conjunction with Repurchase Facility .......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 128,000
Non-Cash Transfer of Asset-Backed Securities
from Held-to-Maturity to Available-for-Sale... $ 7,542,216 $ -- $ -- $ --
Unrealized Gain on Transfer of Asset-Backed
Securities to Available-for-Sale Status ...... $ 289,958 $ -- $ -- $ --
Transfers of Contracts:
Held-for-Sale to Asset-Backed Securities ...... $ 5,804,000 $ 4,484,392 $ -- $ --
Held-for-Investment to Repossessed Vehicles ... $ 1,921,347 $ 1,722,194 $ 440,225 $ --
Held-for-Investment to Held-for-Sale .......... $ 986,196 $ 40,907,980 $ -- $ --
Held-for-Sale to Held-for-Investment .......... $ 5,914,990 $ 2,972,453 $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
<PAGE> 33
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND 1995, THE SIX-MONTH TRANSITION
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, AND THE PERIOD FROM JULY 15, 1993, (INCEPTION)
THROUGH JUNE 30, 1994
(1) NATURE OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Nature of Business
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation (ACC) initiated business in California
on July 15, 1993, under the name American Credit Corporation. The Company
changed its name in October 1995 and was reincorporated in Delaware in November
1995. ACC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, OFL-A Receivables Corp. (OFL-A) and
ACC Receivables Corp. (Receivables) (collectively, the Company), engage
primarily in the business of purchasing, selling and servicing automobile
installment sale contracts (Contracts). The Company specializes in Contracts
with borrowers who generally would not qualify for traditional financing, such
as that provided by commercial banks or captive finance companies of automobile
manufacturers. The Company purchases Contracts directly from automobile dealers,
with the intent to resell them to institutional investors in the form of
securities backed by the Contracts (the Securitization Transactions).
The Company conducts its activities through three legal entities. The
Company's operations (underwriting and Contract servicing) are conducted by ACC.
The Contracts are purchased and held until sale by OFL-A, which is a special
purpose financing corporation. Upon sale, the Contracts are concurrently
transferred from OFL-A to ACC, from ACC to Receivables, and then from
Receivables to a trust (Securitization Trusts). Receivables retains excess
servicing receivables (ESRs) in the Securitization Transactions. Receivables
will also retain subordinated asset-backed securities (Subordinated Securities),
if created, or Contracts pledged as additional credit enhancement in the
Securitization Transactions (Spread Receivables).
Until such time as the Contracts are sold in asset-backed securities,
these Contracts are pledged as collateral to, and are financed under, a
financing facility (Repurchase Facility). Unless terminated prior to May 31,
1997, at the option of the Company, the Repurchase Facility extends through July
15, 1998. The Company also has the option of pledging the Subordinated
Securities, ESRs and credit enhancement cash reserves for borrowings under a
separate financing facility (NIM Facility), which expires in May 1998.
In May 1996, the Company sold, in an initial public offering, 2,000,000
shares of its Common Stock which generated net proceeds of approximately $12.5
million. The proceeds were used to partially pay-down the NIM Facility (included
in Other Borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheet), temporarily reduce
advances on the Repurchase Facility and for other working capital purposes. In
addition, each share of the Company's redeemable Preferred Stock automatically
converted into 23 shares of Common Stock upon consummation of the offering.
Total cumulative dividends of $574,454 were paid to the holders of the
redeemable Preferred Stock subsequent to the conversion. In November 1996, the
Company issued, in a debt offering, $20 million of 10.25% subordinated notes due
2003 (Notes) in a public debt offering which generated net proceeds of
approximately $19.0 million after deducting the underwriting discount and
issuance costs. The proceeds were used to pay-off the outstanding balance of the
NIM Facility, temporarily reduce advances on the Repurchase Facility and for
other general corporate purposes.
(b) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ACC,
OFL-A and Receivables. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
31
<PAGE> 34
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities to prepare these
consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principals. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in
the near term include allowances for credit losses, valuation of ESRs and
estimated gain on sale of Contracts calculation. While management believes that
these estimates are currently adequate, future additions may be necessary based
on changes in economic conditions. Additionally, certain amounts in the prior
periods have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation.
At the inception of the Company on July 15, 1993, the Company adopted a
fiscal year end of June 30. The Company's Initial Fiscal Year ended June 30,
1994 (the Initial Fiscal Year). On January 23, 1996, the Company elected to
change its fiscal year end to December 31, with the change effective as of
January 1, 1995. The purpose of this change was to conform the Company's fiscal
year to the fiscal year adopted by its primary competitors. As a result of the
change in fiscal year end, the Transition Period from July 1, 1994, through
December 31, 1994, (the Transition Period) constitutes an audited period.
Neither the actual results of the Transition Period nor the annualized results
of the Transition Period are indicative of the results that would have been
achieved in a 12-month fiscal year.
(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated financial statements, cash and cash
equivalents include highly liquid debt and investment instruments with an
original maturity of three months or less. Additionally, the Company is subject
to covenants within the indenture under which the Notes were issued (See
Footnote 10.) that require that an amount equal to six months of interest
payments on the Notes be held in a segregated account for the ten calendar days
proceeding a monthly interest payment due date. As of December 31, 1996,
approximately $1 million was held in such an account.
(d) Installment Contracts Held-For-Sale
The Contracts are acquired from automobile dealers, usually at a
discount, and are recorded net of discount and provide for interest of
approximately 20%. The Company also recognizes the interest accrued on Contracts
through the date of purchase as an addition to the discount. Non-refundable fees
and related direct costs are deferred and netted against the Contract balances.
Each Contract provides for full amortization, equal monthly payments and can be
fully prepaid by the borrower at any time. The Company has purchased the
Contracts with the intent to resell them in the future. Contracts held-for-sale
are stated at the lower of aggregate cost or market value.
The Contracts are financed under the terms of the Repurchase Facility
with Cargill Financial Services Corporation (Cargill) and are accounted for as a
financing of the Contracts. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company
maintains the essential elements of ownership of the Contracts, particularly
credit risk and interest rate risk.
The Company enters into forward contracts as hedges relating to the
Contract portfolio. These financial instruments are designed to minimize
exposure and reduce risk from interest rate fluctuations. Gains and losses on
forward contracts are deferred and recognized as adjustments to the basis of the
Contracts until such time that the Contracts are sold. Such amounts are realized
upon the sale of Contracts that are hedged.
(e) Installment Contracts Held-for-Investment
Since January 1, 1995, all Contracts have been purchased with the
intent to be sold in asset-backed securities. Contracts that are identified as
ineligible for the securitization process (primarily due to their payment
history) are transferred to Contracts held-for-investment until such time that
the deficiency has been resolved. Also included in Contracts held-for-investment
are Spread Receivables. The Spread Receivables are included in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets of the Company, but all cash collections pertaining to them must
be deposited into a credit enhancement cash reserve until certain requirements
are met. These Contracts are transferred at the lower of cost or market value
and are accounted for net of an allowance for Contract losses, as determined by
historical loss experience and current delinquency levels.
32
<PAGE> 35
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(f) Allowance for Contract Losses
The allowance for Contract losses is maintained at a level deemed by
management to be adequate to provide for the inherent risks in the Contracts
held-for-investment. Management considers past loss experience and delinquency
levels in determining the adequacy of the allowance for Contract losses.
The Company's policy is to charge-off the principal balance of all
Contracts which are 120 or more days delinquent, except Contracts which are
involved in bankruptcies which are charged-off at 210 or more days delinquent.
In addition, the Company charges off Contracts prior to becoming 120 or 210 days
delinquent if management has knowledge of specific circumstances that impair the
collectibility of the outstanding balances.
(g) Excess Servicing Receivables
The Company has created ESRs as a result of the sale of Contracts in
the Securitization Transactions. ESRs are determined by computing the present
value of the excess of the weighted average coupon on the Contracts sold
(ranging from 19.77% to 20.62%) over the sum of: (i) the coupon on the
asset-backed securities (ranging from 5.95% to 6.90%), (ii) a base servicing fee
paid to the Company (ranging from 3.00% to 3.15%) and (iii) the net charge-offs
expected to be incurred on the portfolio of Contracts sold. For purposes of the
projection of the excess servicing cash flows, the Company assumes that net
charge-offs (including accrued interest) will approximate 11% of the original
principal of the Contracts sold, over the life of the portfolio. Further, the
Company uses an estimated average Contract life of 1.5 to 1.8 years. The cash
flows expected to be received by the Company, before expected losses, are then
discounted at a market interest rate that the Company believes an unaffiliated
third-party purchaser would require as a rate of return on such a financial
instrument. Expected losses are discounted using a risk-free rate equivalent to
the rate earned on securities rated AAA/Aaa or better with a duration similar to
the duration estimated for the underlying Contracts. This results in an
effective overall discount rate of approximately 15% on an annualized basis. The
excess servicing cash flows are only available to the Company to the extent that
there is no impairment of the credit enhancements established at the time the
Contracts are sold. ESRs are amortized using the interest method and are offset
against servicing and ancillary fees. To the extent that the actual future
performance results are different from the estimated excess cash flows, the ESRs
will be adjusted on a quarterly basis with corresponding adjustments made to
income.
The carrying value of the ESRs is subject to the provisions of the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 88-11 pronouncement which states that an
enterprise that sells the right to receive the interest payments, the principal
payments, or a portion of either or both, relating to a loan should allocate the
recorded investment in that loan between the portion of the loan sold and the
portion retained based on the relative fair values of those portions.
(h) Asset-Backed Securities
Securities held-to-maturity are reported at amortized cost (subject to
the provisions of the EITF 88-11 as discussed in the preceding Footnote).
Securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value. If management has the
intent and ability at time of purchase to hold securities until maturity, they
are classified as held to maturity. Securities to be held for indefinite periods
of time, but not necessarily to be held to maturity, or on a long-term basis are
classified as available-for-sale. Unrealized holding gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities are reported as a separate component of equity,
net of tax.
(i) Gain on Sale of Contracts
Each Securitization Transaction results in the recognition of a gain on
sale of Contracts on the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the
period in which the sale was made. These gains are recognized to the extent that
the net proceeds from the sale are greater than the allocated basis of that
portion of the Contracts sold. This gain is subject to the provisions of the
EITF 88-11.
33
<PAGE> 36
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(j) Repossessed Vehicles
Vehicles acquired for non-payment of indebtedness are recorded at the
lower of the estimated fair market value or the outstanding Contract balance.
Such assets are generally sold within 60 days of repossession and any difference
between the sales price, net of expenses, and the carrying amount is treated as
a charge-off or recovery. In addition, the Company recognizes claims submitted
pursuant to a vendor single interest policy as accounts receivables.
(k) Fixed Assets
Furniture, fixtures and equipment are initially recorded at cost.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets (six months to five years).
(l) Organizational Expenses
The Company incurred expenses in connection with the organization of
the business. These expenses were capitalized and are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a five-year period.
(m) Deferred Financing Fees
The Company incurred fees in connection with the creation of the
Repurchase Facility. These fees reflected cash payments made and the estimated
value of Preferred Stock warrants issued in conjunction with the creation of the
Repurchase Facility. The Repurchase Facility costs have been deferred and are
amortized over the five-year term of the Repurchase Facility as an adjustment to
interest expense. The carrying amount of these deferred fees would be
written-off if the Company elects to exercise the option to terminate the
Repurchase Facility (as described in Footnote 19). The Company has incurred fees
in connection with the issuance of Notes. These fees reflected the underwriting
discount and issuance costs. These costs have been deferred and are amortized
over the seven-year term of the Notes as an adjustment to interest expense.
(n) Servicing and Ancillary Fees
Servicing fees are reported as income when earned, net of related
amortization of capitalized excess servicing fees receivable. Additionally, the
Company has the right to collect late payment fees and non-sufficient funds fees
from borrowers, as well as collection costs incurred in connection with
delinquent accounts. Ancillary fees are accounted for on a cash basis.
Collection expenditures are recorded as expenses in the period incurred. Any
reimbursements of collection costs are recognized as an expense recovery in the
period that the proceeds are received.
(o) Income Taxes
The Company filed consolidated federal income and combined state
franchise tax returns on a fiscal year basis through December 31, 1995, and has
filed on a calendar basis thereafter. The Company accounts for income taxes
under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred income taxes are
recognized based on future tax consequences due to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date.
(p) Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Due to the significant changes in the capital structure of the Company
upon the closing of the initial public offering as discussed at Footnote 1(a),
historical net income (loss) per share prior to the year ended December 31,
1995, is not presented. Net income per share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding and common equivalent
shares, unless the effect of common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive.
However, pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletins, Common Stock and common equivalent shares issued during the 12-month
period prior to the filing of the offering document have been
34
<PAGE> 37
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all periods
presented, even if anti-dilutive. In addition, net income per share reflects the
23 for 1 stock split which occurred in connection with the Company's initial
public offering.
(q) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
In November 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation." This statement establishes financial accounting
standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. SFAS No. 123 permits the
Company to choose either a fair value-based method or the intrinsic value-based
method that is contained in APB Opinion 25. SFAS No. 123 requires pro forma
disclosures of net income and earnings per share computed as if the fair value
based method has been applied in financial statements of companies that continue
to follow current practice in accounting for such arrangements under Opinion 25.
SFAS No. 123 applies to all stock-based employee compensation plans in which an
employer grants shares of its stock or other equity instruments to employees
except for employee stock ownership plans. SFAS No. 123 also applies to plans in
which the employer incurs liabilities to employees in amounts based on the price
of the employer's stock (i.e., stock option plans, stock purchase plans,
restricted stock plans and stock appreciation rights). The statement also
specifies the accounting for transactions in which a company issues stock
options or other equity instruments for services provided by non-employees or to
acquire goods or services from outside suppliers or vendors. The recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 for companies choosing to adopt the new fair value
based method of accounting for stock-based compensation arrangements may be
adopted immediately and will apply to all transactions entered into fiscal years
that begin after December 15, 1995. The disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995; however,
disclosure of the pro forma net income and earnings per share, as if the fair
value method of accounting for stock-based compensation had been elected, is
required for all awards granted in fiscal years beginning after December 31,
1994. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based
compensation under APB Opinion 25 and, as a result, pro forma disclosures have
been provided. (See Footnote 17.)
(r) New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1996, the FASB issued SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinquishment of Liabilities". This
statement specifies when financial assets and liabilities are to be removed from
an entity's financial statements, the accounting for servicing assets and
liabilities and the accounting for assets that can be contractually prepaid in
such a way that the holder would not recover substantially all of its recorded
investment. Under SFAS No. 125, an entity recognizes only assets it controls and
liabilities it has incurred, discontinues recognition of assets only when
control has been surrendered, and discontinues recognition of liabilities only
when they have been extinguished. SFAS No. 125 requires that the selling entity
continue to carry retained interests relating to assets it no longer recognizes.
Such retained interests are based on the relative fair values of the retained
interests of the subject assets at the date of transfer. Transfers not meeting
the criteria for sale recognition are accounted for as a secured borrowing with
a pledge of collateral. Under SFAS No. 125, certain collateralized borrowings
may result in assets no longer being recognized if the assets are provided as
collateral and the secured party takes control of the collateral. This
determination is based upon whether: (1) the secured party is permitted to
repledge or sell the collateral and (2) the debtor does not have the right to
redeem the collateral on short notice. Extinguishments of liabilities are
recognized only when the debtor pays the creditor and is relieved of its
obligation for the liability, or when the debtor is legally released from being
the primary obligor under the liability, either judicially or by the creditor.
SFAS No. 125 requires an entity to recognize its obligation to service financial
assets that are retained in a transfer of assets in the form of a servicing
asset or liability. The servicing asset is to be amortized in proportion to, and
over the period of, net servicing income. Servicing assets and liabilities are
to be assessed for impairment based on their fair value. SFAS No. 125 modifies
the accounting for interest-only strips or retained interests in
securitizations, such as capitalized servicing fees receivable, that can be
contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the holder would
not recover substantially all of its recorded investment. In this case, it
requires that they be classified as available-for-sale or as trading securities.
Interest-only strips and retained interests are to be recorded at fair value.
Changes in fair value are included in operations, if classified as trading
securities, or in shareholders' equity as unrealized holding gains or losses,
net of the related tax effect, if classified
35
<PAGE> 38
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
as available for sale. Beginning January 1, 1997, the Company adopted SFAS No.
125 and recorded its ESRs at fair value. The adjustment to carrying value was
included in shareholders' equity as unrealized gains at that time.
(2) RESTRICTED CASH AND CREDIT ENHANCEMENT CASH RESERVES
With regard to Contracts owned, the Company is required to deposit all
borrower payments, Contract liquidation proceeds and certain other receipts into
restricted bank accounts under the control of a custodian. These accounts are
owned by the Company, but funds may only be released by the custodian under the
terms of the Repurchase Facility. Generally, the funds will be released only
upon the repurchase and sale of the Contracts.
The Company is a party to certain agreements in connection with the
sale of Contracts in asset-backed securities. The terms of some of these
agreements have provided that simultaneous with the sale of bonds to investors,
the Company must make a cash contribution, as a credit enhancement, to a credit
enhancement cash reserve under the control of a trustee. Subsequent to the sale,
all cash received from the ESRs, Subordinated Securities and the Spread
Receivables, is deposited into credit enhancement cash reserves. The credit
enhancement cash reserve is owned by the Company, but funds will only be
released by the trustee when certain credit enhancement requirements are met.
The agreement provides that the amount of cash to be maintained in the credit
enhancement cash reserve shall be at a specified percentage of the principal
balance of the senior bonds. Additionally, there are provisions within the
agreements that state that if the performance of any Securitization Trust is not
sufficient to meet the cash requirements of the senior bondholders and the
credit enhancement reserves of that pool have been depleted, the shortfall can
be drawn from credit enhancement cash reserves relating to other Securitization
Trusts. As principal payments are made to the bondholders, and if the pledged
cash is in excess of the specified percentage of the principal balance of the
bonds, the trustee will release the excess amount to the Company.
(3) INSTALLMENT CONTRACTS HELD-FOR-SALE
Installment Contracts held-for-sale are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Principal Balance .............. $ 21,888,020 $ 29,517,717
Purchase Discount .............. (1,071,263) (1,161,892)
Net Deferred Expenses (Fees).... 231,586 (392,889)
Unrealized Hedge Losses ........ 30,349 224,842
------------ ------------
$ 21,078,692 $ 28,187,778
============ ============
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively, approximately $22
million and $31 million of the Contracts, including certain Contracts
held-for-investment, have been pledged to Cargill subject to the terms of the
Repurchase Facility. These Contracts are held by a custodian until such time
that they are repurchased. (See Footnotes 4 and 9.)
The Company maintains an ongoing hedging program to minimize the impact
of changing interest rates on the value of the Contracts. The hedging strategy
is implemented through the forward sale of two-year Treasury notes or futures
Contracts of two-year Treasury instruments with remaining terms of approximately
1.5 years to 2 years, with Cargill acting as a counterparty to these hedging
transactions. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had two-year Treasury futures
Contracts with a notional amount of $15 million for sale in March 1997. As of
December 31, 1995, the Company had sold forward $25 million of Treasury notes
for delivery in January 1996.
Unrealized gains and losses on the hedging transactions are reflected
as an adjustment to the basis of the Contracts. Gains and losses are recognized
upon sale of the Contracts. The Company recognized $206,000 of net gains on the
hedging program during the year ended December 31, 1996. The Company recognized
$927,000 of net losses on the hedging program during the year ended December 31,
1995. Prior to the year ended December 31, 1995, there were no hedging
transactions.
36
<PAGE> 39
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In addition to the Contracts owned by the Company, the Company serviced
$225 million and $87 million of Contracts for others as of December 31, 1996,
and 1995, respectively. The Company services Contracts for borrowers residing in
approximately 40 states, with the largest concentrations of Contracts in
California, Texas, Florida and Pennsylvania. An economic slowdown or recession
or a change in the regulatory or legal environment in one or more of these
states could have a material adverse effect on the performance of the Company's
existing servicing portfolio and on its Contract purchases.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, and 1995, the Company sold
$191 million and $101 million, respectively, of Contracts in connection with the
securitization transactions. For the same periods, the Company recognized gains
associated with these securitizations of $15.2 million and $8.1 million,
respectively. No Contracts were sold prior to the year ended December 31, 1995.
Contract packages are submitted to the Company for funding by
automobile dealers. The Company evaluates each borrower's creditworthiness on a
case-by-case basis. Contract packages representing $4.5 million and $2.1
million, were approved and submitted to the Company for funding as of December
31, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
(4) INSTALLMENT CONTRACTS HELD-FOR-INVESTMENT
Contracts held-for-investment represent Contracts that are ineligible
for sale (primarily due to their delinquent status) or represent Contracts which
management had no present intention to sell. These Contracts are subject to the
terms of the Repurchase Facility or the Spread Receivables pledge agreement and
are held by a custodian. Included are performing Contracts with a principal
balance of $2.9 million, which are pledged in connection with the 1996-D
Transaction. The Contracts held-for-investment are comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Principal Balance ............... $ 4,151,152 $ 1,040,695
Purchase Discount ............... (200,292) (40,727)
Net Deferred Expenses (Fees) .... 42,783 (13,772)
Allowance for Contract Losses ... (565,000) (476,808)
----------- -----------
$ 3,428,643 $ 509,388
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The Company maintains an allowance for Contract losses based on the
outstanding principal balance of Contracts held-for-investment. A summary of the
activity in the allowance for Contract losses is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIX -MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Beginning Balance ... $ 476,808 $ 1,181,004 $ 580,462 $ --
Provision ........ 1,113,069 673,802 902,361 592,325
Charge-offs ...... (1,223,252) (1,435,224) (302,735) (11,863)
Recoveries ....... 198,375 57,226 916 --
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------
Ending Balance ...... $ 565,000 $ 476,808 $ 1,181,004 $ 580,462
=========== =========== =========== =========
</TABLE>
(5) ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
In connection with securitizations, the Company has retained
Subordinated Securities representing 5% of the principal balance of the
Contracts sold. These have pass-through rates from 5.95% to 6.90%. At time of
purchase and as of December 31, 1995, these securities were deemed to be
held-to-maturity and had been valued at a discount to yield approximately 13%.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company reclassified these
securities as available-for-sale and the carrying amount approximates the fair
value based on market rates as of December 31, 1996.
37
<PAGE> 40
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(a) Asset-Backed Securities Available-for-Sale.
A summary of the activity in asset-backed securities available-for-sale
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31,
1996
----------
<S> <C>
Beginning Balance ............................................... $ --
Transfers from Asset-Backed Securities Held-to-Maturity ... 7,542,216
Unrealized Gain ........................................... 289,958
----------
Ending Balance .................................................. $7,832,174
==========
</TABLE>
There were no asset-backed securities available-for-sale prior to the
year ended December 31, 1996.
(b) Asset-Backed Securities Held-to-Maturity
A summary of the activity in asset-backed securities held-to-maturity
is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, DEC. 31,
1996 1995
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Beginning Balance ................................................. $ 3,910,080 $ --
Additions from Securitizations ............................. 5,804,000 4,484,392
Principal Reductions ....................................... (2,582,842) (710,880)
Amortization of Purchase Discount .......................... 410,978 136,568
Transfers to Asset-Backed Securities Available-for-Sale .... (7,542,216) --
----------- -----------
Ending Balance .................................................... $ -- $ 3,910,080
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
There were no asset-backed securities held-to-maturity prior to the
year ended December 31, 1995. The transfers of asset-backed securities to
available-for-sale status during 1996 were the result of a revised cash
management strategy of the Company.
(6) EXCESS SERVICING RECEIVABLES
A summary of the activity in ESRs is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Beginning Balance ......................... $ 5,590,878 $ --
Additions from Securitizations ..... 14,864,000 7,700,699
Amortization of Excess Servicing ... (4,881,260) (2,109,821)
------------ -----------
Ending Balance ............................ $ 15,573,618 $ 5,590,878
============ ===========
</TABLE>
In connection with the valuation of ESRs, the Company projects losses
in the pool of Contracts which effectively represents the estimated undiscounted
recourse loss allowance offset against the ESRs. As of December 31, 1996, and
1995, the estimated undiscounted recourse loss allowance embedded in the ESRs,
excluding accrued interest, was $19.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively.
This recourse loss allowance represents 8.8% and 8.1% of the Contracts serviced
for others as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
There were no ESRs prior to the year ended December 31, 1995.
(7) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of December 31, 1996, and 1995, the Company had approximately $1.5
million and $626,000, respectively, due from Cargill for Contracts funded by the
Company which were delivered to a custodian, but not yet funded through the
Repurchase Facility. Additionally, the Company had $1.7 million and $616,000, as
of
38
<PAGE> 41
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively, of servicing fees, excess servicing
fees and principal and interest payments on the subordinated securities, due
from the Securitization Trusts.
(8) FIXED ASSETS, NET
Furniture, fixtures and equipment consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment ... $ 1,087,670 $ 679,826
Leasehold Improvements ............ 100,051 70,889
Computer Equipment ................ 577,437 482,891
----------- -----------
1,765,158 1,233,606
Less Accumulated Depreciation ..... (624,633) (391,590)
----------- -----------
Fixed Assets, Net ............. $ 1,140,525 $ 842,016
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The Company has entered into lease arrangements with Cargill Leasing
Corporation, an affiliate of Cargill, for the sale and leaseback of certain of
its furniture and equipment. These leases are accounted for as capital leases.
The original cost of the equipment subject to the capital leases is $731,000.
(See Footnote 14.)
(9) REPURCHASE FACILITY, NET
The Company has entered into a financing arrangement, the object of
which is to provide interim financing for the Contracts purchased.
Contractually, the Repurchase Facility expires in July 1998; however, in January
1997, the Company entered into an agreement with Cargill that gives the Company
the option to terminate the Repurchase Facility through May 31, 1997. (See
Footnote 19.)
Under the terms of the Repurchase Facility, the Company will sell
Contracts to Cargill with an agreement to repurchase the Contracts. The
repurchase is intended to occur concurrent with the sale of the Contracts. The
Repurchase Facility requires Contracts to be held by a custodian and requires
the Company to deposit borrower payments into restricted bank accounts. When the
Contracts are repurchased from Cargill, the Company is obligated to pay Cargill
a repurchase fee that is calculated as a percentage of the Contracts ranging
from 2% to 0.5%, depending upon the cumulative amount of Contract dispositions.
The Company is obligated to repurchase Contracts in the event that: (i) the
Contracts do not conform to the terms of the Repurchase Facility, (ii) a breach
of a representation or warranty has occurred or (iii) the Company has defaulted
under the terms of the Repurchase Facility. In addition, the Repurchase Facility
contains certain restrictive covenants that include, without limitation,
achieving specific Contract purchase volumes. If these covenants are not met, a
termination of the facility could occur. As of December 31, 1996, and 1995,
management believes the Company was in compliance with such covenants. The
parent company has guaranteed $5.0 million of the amount outstanding under the
Repurchase Facility and the NIM Facility (included in Other Borrowings on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet (See Footnote 11.) in the event of a default under
either facility.
The Repurchase Facility balance is net of deferred costs of $186,000,
and $310,000 as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively. The interest rate
on the Repurchase Facility is the one-month LIBOR, plus 3.25%. The relevant
LIBOR was 5.5% as of December 31, 1996, and 5.7% as of December 31, 1995. In
addition to amounts in the restricted cash accounts, advances on the Repurchase
Facility were secured by Contracts aggregating approximately $23 million and $31
million as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively. These amounts include
$1.5 million and $642,000 of Contracts which were delivered, but not yet funded
by Cargill, as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively.
(10) SUBORDINATED NOTES, NET
On November 18, 1996, the Company received net cash proceeds of $19.0
million from the issuance of the Notes in an underwritten public offering, after
deducting the underwriting discount and issuance costs. The proceeds were used
to repay borrowings under the NIM Facility (included in other borrowing on the
consolidated balance sheets), partially repay borrowings under the Repurchase
Facility and as other general working capital.
39
<PAGE> 42
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Interest on the Notes is payable monthly commencing January 1, 1997, at an
interest rate of 10.25% per annum, until December 1, 2003, when the entire $20
million principal is due in full. Interest expense, including amortization of
underwriting discount and issuance costs, was $252,000 for the year ended
December 31, 1996. The Company recognizes interest and amortization expenses
related to the Notes using a method which approximates the effective interest
method over the expected redemption period. The Notes are redeemable at the
option of the Company after December 1, 1999. If the Company redeems the Notes
prior to maturity, it will pay in cash a redemption price equal to the following
percentages of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed, plus interest to the
date fixed for redemption:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
IF REDEEMED DURING REDEMPTION
THE 12 MONTHS BEGINNING: PRICE
-------------------------- -----------
<S> <C>
December 1, 1999................................... 104%
December 1, 2000................................... 102%
December 1, 2001 and thereafter.................... 100%
</TABLE>
The Notes are redeemable at the option of the holders in the event of
the death of a holder (subject to certain individual and aggregate annual
limitations) and in the event of a fundamental structural change in the Company
or fundamental change of business as defined in the indenture pursuant to which
the Notes were issued. The Notes are subordinated to certain existing and future
indebtedness of the Company as defined in the indenture. The indenture requires
the Company to comply with their covenants. Management believes that the Company
was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 1996.
As of December 31, 1996, the $20 million outstanding principal balance
of the Notes is reported net of unamortized underwriting discount and issuance
costs of approximately $1.0 million.
(11) OTHER BORROWINGS
In September 1995, the Company entered into the NIM Facility with
Cargill, which is collateralized by the Subordinated Securities and the ESRs.
(See Footnote 19.) The NIM Facility and the Repurchase Facility have
cross-default and cross-collateralization clauses which state that the Company
must be in compliance with all covenants relating to both agreements at all
times. In November of 1996, the Company paid-off the entire outstanding balance
with proceeds from the issuance of the Notes, but may draw on the facility as
required to pay securitization costs and expenses. As of December 31, 1995, the
Company had drawn $7.4 million under this facility. The interest rate on the NIM
Facility is the one-month LIBOR, plus 7%. The Company also pays an annual
commitment fee payable in four quarterly installments. The NIM Facility has a
contractual maturity date of May 22, 1998. The NIM Facility is subject to
certain restrictive covenants. If these covenants are not met, a termination of
the facility could occur. As of December 31, 1996, and 1995, management believes
the Company was in compliance with its covenants. In January 1997 (unaudited),
the Company entered into an agreement changing certain terms of the NIM Facility
and reducing the commitment amount to $10 million and reducing the annual fee to
$100,000.
The Company retired a bridge financing facility of $2.5 million with
proceeds of the NIM Facility. The Bridge Financing Facility had an interest rate
of 12%.
(12) PREFERRED STOCK
(a) Redeemable Preferred Stock
Each outstanding share of redeemable Preferred Stock was converted into
23 shares of Common Stock in May 1996 when the Company completed the initial
public offering of its Common Stock. In June 1996, $574,454 of dividends were
paid to the holders of the redeemable Preferred Stock.
The holders of the Series A, Series B and Series C Preferred Stock were
entitled to receive cumulative dividends of 4%, 6% and 4%, respectively, of the
stated value of the shares when and as declared by the Board of Directors. No
dividends were to be paid prior to the earlier of: (i) July 15, 1998, (ii) 30
days following the
40
<PAGE> 43
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Company's initial public offering or (iii) a liquidation of the Company. Upon
liquidation, holders of the Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, in
preference to any payment on the Common Stock, an amount equal to the stated
value of the shares, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The Preferred Stock
was redeemable, at the option of the holder, five years (for the Series A and
Series C) or two years (for the Series B) from the date of issue at the stated
value, plus accumulated dividends. Each share of redeemable Preferred Stock
automatically converted into 23 shares of Common Stock upon the closing of the
Company's initial public offering of its Common Stock.
The changes in redeemable Preferred Stock are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SERIES A SERIES B SERIES C
PREFERRED PREFERRED PREFERRED TOTAL TOTAL
STOCK STOCK STOCK SHARES AMOUNT
----------- ----------- ------------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at June 30, 1994 ......... $ 4,108,400 $ -- $ -- 120,000 $ 4,108,400
Issuance of Series A Preferred ... 249,977 -- -- 7,537 249,977
----------- ----------- ------------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1994 ..... 4,358,377 -- -- 127,537 4,358,377
Issuance of Series B Preferred ... -- 749,970 -- 11,538 749,970
Exercise of Warrants ............. 1,170,702 -- -- 35,294 1,170,702
----------- ----------- ------------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1995 ..... 5,529,079 749,970 -- 174,369 6,279,049
Issuance of Series C Preferred ... -- -- 1,000,995 7,913 1,000,995
Conversion to Common Stock ....... (5,529,079) (749,970) (1,000,995) (182,282) (7,280,044)
----------- ----------- ------------- --------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1996 ..... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
=========== =========== ============= ========= ===========
</TABLE>
(b) Blank Check Preferred Stock
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of
1,817,718 shares of Preferred Stock that have not been designated or issued
(blank check preferred) and may be subject, without shareholder approval, to
being issued in one or more series with such preferences, limitations and
relative rights as are determined by the Board of Directors of the Company at
the time of the issuance.
(c) Warrants
In July 1993, the Company issued to Cargill a warrant in connection
with the Repurchase Facility for 35,294 shares of the Company's Series A
redeemable Preferred Stock. The warrant entitled Cargill to acquire a like
number of shares of Series A redeemable Preferred Stock for an exercise price in
the range of $33.17 per share to $66.17 per share based upon the net book value
per share of the Common Stock. The warrant was to expire on the earlier of: (i)
July 15, 1999, (ii) the closing of an initial public offering or (iii) the
termination of the Repurchase Facility by Cargill due to a material breach by
Cargill. The warrant was fully exercised by Cargill in September 1995, at an
exercise price of $33.17 per share.
41
<PAGE> 44
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(13) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company discloses estimated fair values for its financial
instruments, as well as the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate
fair values. The following information does not purport to represent the
aggregate net fair value of the Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
----------------------------- -----------------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Instrument:
Installment Contracts Held-for-Sale ... $21,078,692 $21,888,000 $28,187,778 $29,518,000
Installment Contracts Held-for-
Investment ......................... 3,428,643 3,540,000 509,388 509,000
Asset-Backed Securities:
Held-to-Maturity ................... -- -- 3,910,080 4,251,000
Available-for-Sale ................. 7,832,174 7,832,000 -- --
Excess Servicing Receivables .......... 15,573,618 17,297,000 5,590,878 5,753,000
Repurchase Facility ................... 11,026,130 11,026,000 29,708,252 29,708,000
Subordinated Notes Payable ............ 19,196,110 19,196,000 -- --
Other Borrowings ...................... -- -- 7,439,957 7,440,000
Lease Liability ....................... 332,259 353,000 519,486 569,000
Hedge Liability ....................... 44,000 44,000 223,000 223,000
</TABLE>
Installment Contracts Held-for-Sale
The carrying value of Contracts held-for-sale represents the Company's
cost basis in the Contracts. Also, since the Company intends to hold the
Contracts for a relatively short period of time and then sell them through a
securitization, typically at par, fair values of Contracts held-for-sale is
estimated to be par value.
Installment Contracts Held-for-Investment
Estimates have been made, based on historical experience, of the value
of the Contracts within the held-for-investment portfolio. The carrying value is
reported net of an allowance for the probable losses on these Contracts and is a
reasonable estimate of what management believes to be the fair value of the
Contracts in this portfolio.
Asset-Backed Securities Held-to-Maturity and Excess Servicing
Receivables
The fair values of the asset-backed securities held-to-maturity
(elsewhere referred to as Subordinated Securities) and the ESRs are estimated by
discounting future cash flows using credit and discount rates that the Company
believes reflect the current market conditions and estimated credit, interest
rate and prepayment risks associated with similar types of instruments.
Asset-Backed Securities Available-for-Sale
Asset-backed securities available-for-sale are valued based on current
market conditions and estimated credit, interest rate and prepayment risks
associated with similar types of instruments and, thus, the carrying value
approximates fair value.
Subordinated Notes Payable
As the Notes were issued in November 1996, the carrying value
approximates the market value, given market prices and rates for similar debt
with similar remaining terms as of December 31, 1996.
42
<PAGE> 45
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Repurchase Facility and Other Borrowings
The carrying value approximates fair value as these facilities reprice
frequently at market interest rates.
Lease Liability
The fair value of the lease liabilities is estimated by discounting the
future cash obligations using a rate that the Company believes reflects the
market interest rate for similar types of instruments.
Hedge Liability
The carrying value approximates fair value as this position refixes
frequently at market rates. The fair value of the hedge position is based upon
quoted market prices.
(14) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Leases
The Company leases office space, computers and other equipment under
various operating leases. Future minimum rental payments on these operating
leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 ............................... $ 864,304
1998 ............................... 576,925
1999 ............................... 323,952
2000 ............................... 306,353
2001 ............................... 294,445
Thereafter ......................... 69,963
----------
Total Payments ..................... $2,435,942
==========
</TABLE>
Total lease expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995,
the Transition Period, and the Initial Fiscal Year was $696,000, $445,000,
$134,000 and $103,000, respectively.
The Company also leases furniture and equipment under various capital
leases with a related party. The future minimum lease payments on these capital
leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------
<S> <C> <C>
1997 .................................... $ 280,784
1998 .................................... 106,898
Thereafter .............................. --
---------
Total Payments .......................... 387,682
Less Amount Representing Interest ....... (55,423)
---------
Total Lease Liability ................... $ 332,259
=========
</TABLE>
(b) Litigation
The Company is subject to lawsuits which arise in the ordinary course
of business. Management is of the opinion, based in part upon consultation with
its counsel, that the liability to the Company, if any, arising from existing
and threatened lawsuits would have no material adverse effect on the Company's
financial position and results of operations.
43
<PAGE> 46
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(15) INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense for the year ended December 31,
1996, and 1995, the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD FROM
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Current Income Taxes
Federal ............................... $ 1,371,000 $ 12,000 $ -- $ --
State ................................. 556,000 23,000 -- --
----------- ----------- --------- -----------
Subtotal ........................... 1,927,000 35,000 -- --
Deferred Income Taxes
Federal .............................. 1,437,000 1,171,000 (329,000) (818,000)
State ................................ 450,000 361,000 (24,000) (187,000)
----------- ----------- --------- -----------
Subtotal .......................... 1,887,000 1,532,000 (353,000) (1,005,000)
Change in Valuation Allowance ............. -- (1,358,000) 353,000 1,005,000
Taxes Allocated to Shareholders' Equity ... (122,000) -- -- --
----------- ----------- --------- -----------
Total .............................. $ 3,692,000 $ 209,000 $ -- $ --
=========== =========== ========= ===========
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of expected income taxes computed using the federal
income tax rate of 34% to taxes actually provided is set forth as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD FROM
SIX-MONTH JULY 15, 1993
TRANSITION (INCEPTION)
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED THROUGH
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995 DEC. 31, 1994 JUNE 30, 1994
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Computed Expected Income Taxes ............ $2,989,000 $ 1,250,000 $(337,000) $(880,000)
Change in Valuation Allowance, Net of
(Utilization of) Non-Recognition of Net
Operating Loss Carryforward ........... -- (1,358,000) 353,000 880,000
State Taxes, Net of Federal Benefit ....... 664,000 339,000 -- --
Alternative Minimum Tax ................... -- 12,000 -- --
Other ..................................... 39,000 (34,000) (16,000) --
---------- ----------- --------- ---------
Total Income Taxes ................... $3,692,000 $ 209,000 $ -- $ --
========== =========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE> 47
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Deferred income taxes result from the temporary differences between the
tax basis of an asset or a liability and its reported amount in the consolidated
balance sheets. The significant components that comprise deferred tax assets and
liabilities at December 31, 1996, and 1995, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred Tax Assets:
Allowance for Contract Losses ................ $ 257,000 $ 216,000
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards ............. -- 452,000
Amortization ................................. 1,029,000 245,000
Depreciation ................................. 170,000 120,000
State Tax Benefits ........................... 392,000 45,000
Other ........................................ 193,000 25,000
----------- -----------
Total Gross Deferred Tax Assets ............ 2,041,000 1,103,000
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Gain on Securitization ....................... (3,772,000) (1,020,000)
Deferred Contract Fees ....................... (124,000) (161,000)
Unrealized Gain on Asset-Backed Securities ... (122,000) --
Other ........................................ (84,000) (96,000)
----------- -----------
Total Gross Deferred Tax Liabilities ....... (4,102,000) (1,277,000)
----------- -----------
Net Deferred Tax Liability ...................... $(2,061,000) $ (174,000)
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for
future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are
deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will
realize deferred tax assets existing at December 31, 1996, and 1995.
(16) 401(K) PLAN
The Company adopted a defined contribution plan, pursuant to Internal
Revenue Code Section 401(k), effective February 1, 1994. Eligible employees,
generally those who have completed more than 90 days of service, may elect to
contribute from 2% to 20% of their pre-tax compensation. Voluntary Company
contributions to the plan are allocated based on 50% of the employee
contributions up to $1,000 per calendar year. The plan may be terminated by the
Company at any time. Employer contributions to the plan were approximately
$58,000, $37,000, $25,000 and $14,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996, and
1995, the Transition Period and the Initial Fiscal Year.
(17) STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company's 1995 stock option plan (Employee Plan) covers 450,000
shares of Common Stock. The Employee Plan permits the grant of incentive stock
options or non-qualified options to any employees of the Company. Incentive
stock options may not have an exercise price of less than the fair market value
of the Common Stock on the date of grant, except options granted to holders of
more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock may not have an exercise price of
less than 110% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of the
grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the
Employee Plan and determines the employees who may participate, the amount of
timing of each option grant and the vesting schedule for options. As of December
31, 1996, and 1995, stock options representing 511,338 and 442,500 shares of
common stock, respectively, were outstanding.
The Company's separate stock option plan for its non-employee Directors
(Director Plan) covers 100,000 shares of Common Stock. The Director Plan
provides for the award of non-qualified options, which expire five years from
the date of grant, covering 20,000 shares of Common Stock to each non-employee
director on the date of the plan's adoption and to any future elected or
appointed non-employee director. Each of the options granted to the four current
non-employee directors is at an exercise price of $7.25 per share. One-fourth of
the option shares were vested on the date of grant and the balance will vest
over the subsequent three years at a rate of one-third per year. Any future
option grant will be at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the date
45
<PAGE> 48
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
of the grant. At December 31, 1996, stock options representing 80,000 shares of
Common Stock were outstanding and 40,000 were vested.
Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plan
been determined consistent with FASB No. 123, the Company's net income and
earnings per share (EPS) would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDING YEAR ENDING
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
---------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Income As Reported $ 5,099,691 $ 3,466,355
====================== ====================
Pro Forma $ 4,818,459 $ 3,445,542
====================== ====================
Primary EPS As Reported $ 0.68 $ 0.61
====================== ====================
Pro Forma $ 0.64 $ 0.61
====================== ====================
Fully Diluted EPS As Reported $ 0.67 $ 0.60
====================== ====================
Pro Forma $ 0.64 $ 0.60
====================== ====================
</TABLE>
Pro forma net income reflects only options granted in 1996 and 1995.
The full impact of calculating compensation cost for stock options under SFAS
No. 123 is not reflected in the pro forma net income amounts presented above
because compensation cost is reflected over the options vesting period and
compensation cost for options granted prior to January 1, 1995, is not
considered.
The per share weighed-average fair value of stock options granted
during 1996 and 1995 was approximately $3.90. The fair value of each option
grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions: zero dividend yield,
expected volatility of approximately 47%, risk-free interest rates of
approximately 7% and an expected life of approximately six years.
A summary of the status of the Company's employee and director stock
option plans as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, and changes during the years
ended on those dates is presented below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DEC. 31, 1996 DEC. 31, 1995
----------------------------- -------------------------------
WEIGHTED-
SHARES AVERAGE SHARES WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
(000S) EXERCISE PRICE (000S) EXERCISE PRICE
-------- -------------- -------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at Beginning of Year 442,500 $7.25 -- $ --
Granted 84,588 6.51 442,500 7.25
Exercised -- -- -- --
Forfeited (15,750) (7.25) -- --
-------- ----- ------- -----
Outstanding at End of Year 511,338 $7.13 442,500 $7.25
======== ===== ======= =====
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about employee stock options
outstanding at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------- ---------------------
NUMBER OUTSTANDING REMAINING NUMBER EXCERCISABLE
EXERCISE PRICE AS OF DEC. 31, 1996 LIFE (YEARS) AS OF DEC. 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------- ------------------- ------------ --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
$ 7.25 426,750 8.9 113,354
$ 6.60 61,088 9.1 -
$ 6.25 23,500 9.5 -
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 49
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(18) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended December 31, 1995, the Company entered into
employment agreements with its three senior executives, which supersede previous
agreements and extend through December 31, 1998. Additionally, the Company has
other borrowings with shareholders as discussed in Footnotes 9 and 11 and
capital lease arrangements with a related party as discussed in Footnotes 8 and
14.
(19) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
In January 1997, the Company announced that it had entered into an
agreement with Cargill modifying the existing Repurchase Facility between the
Company and Cargill. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will have the
right, at its option, to terminate the Repurchase Facility at any time through
May 31, 1997, by providing Cargill with 14 days written notice and repaying the
outstanding balance of the facility. In exchange for this early termination
option, the Company issued Cargill 174,500 shares of unregistered Common Stock
with a fair value of $10.88 per share as of the date of issuance. After issuance
of these shares, Cargill's ownership of the Company's Common Stock increased to
13.4% from its current 11.6%. If the Company does not elect to exercise its
right to terminate the Repurchase Facility, the market value of these shares
will be credited against future repurchase fees that become due under the
Repurchase Facility. If the Company elects to terminate the Repurchase Facility,
the market value of the Common Stock issued to Cargill, as well as approximately
$155,000 of capitalized expenses incurred in connection with the creation of the
Repurchase Facility, will be written-off. Also included in this agreement is a
modification of the NIM Facility (included in Other Borrowings on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet) that reduced maximum borrowings from $15 million to
$10 million.
(20) QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly operating
results for the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995. This information has
been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements
and includes all adjustments (which consist solely of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial information of such
periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH YEAR
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ENDED
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Interest Income $ 931.468 $ 1,103,136 $ 1,294,713 $ 1,370,807 $ 4,700,124
Contract Losses (148,863) (199,921) (241,514) (522,771) (1,113,069)
Other Income:
Servicing and Ancillary Fees 848,879 962,868 1,476,779 1,626,142 4,914,668
Gain on Sale of Contracts 2,901,586 3,683,023 3,830,825 4,771,455 15,186,889
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Total Income 4,533,070 5,549,106 6,360,803 7,245,633 23,688,612
Total Expenses 3,175,520 3,587,549 3,762,477 4,371,375 14,896,921
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Income Before Taxes 1,357,550 1,961,557 2,598,326 2,874,258 8,791,691
Income Tax Provision 570,000 824,000 1,091,000 1,207,000 3,692,000
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Net Income $ 787,550 $ 1,137,557 $ 1,507,326 $ 1,667,258 $ 5,099,691
=========== =========== =========== =========== ============
Fully-Diluted EPS $ 0.13 $ 0.16 $ 0.18 $ 0.20 $ 0.67
=========== =========== =========== =========== ============
Weighted Average Common and
Common Shares Outstanding 6,295,655 7,166,818 8,346,834 8,369,897 7,588,476
=========== =========== =========== =========== ============
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE> 50
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH YEAR
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER ENDED
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Interest Income $ 1,287,048 $ 793,393 $ 860,408 $ 391,505 $ 3,332,354
Contract Losses (221,725) 211,377 (289,842) (373,612) (673,802)
Other Income:
Servicing and Ancillary Fees 30,743 469,974 487,313 769,227 1,757,257
Gain on Sale of Contracts -- 3,913,477 1,890,600 2,252,059 8,056,136
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Total Income 1,096,066 5,388,221 2,948,479 3,039,179 12,471,945
Total Expenses 1,614,598 2,535,003 2,178,475 2,468,514 8,796,590
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Income (Loss) Before Taxes (518,532) 2,853,218 770,004 570,665 3,675,355
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) -- 35,000 282,380 (108,380) 209,000
----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Net Income (Loss) $ (518,532) $2,818,218 $ 487,624 $ 679,045 $ 3,466,355
=========== ========== =========== =========== ============
Fully-Diluted EPS $ (0.10) $ 0.49 $ 0.08 $ 0.11 $ 0.60
=========== ========== =========== =========== ============
Weighted Average Common and
Common Shares Outstanding 5,298,717 5,697,427 5,835,593 6,110,479 5,737,258
=========== ========== =========== =========== ============
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE> 51
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. The information set forth below
describes the directors and executive officers of the Company as of February 15,
1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Rocco J. Fabiano....................... 40 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
Gary S. Burdick........................ 40 President
Rellen M. Stewart...................... 43 Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
John J. Cruz........................... 48 Senior Vice President of Contract Servicing
R. Frank Mercer........................ 50 Senior Vice President, Chief Credit Officer
Jack R. Cohen.......................... 44 Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary
Ethan J. Falk.......................... 43 Director
Jack P.Fitzpatrick..................... 43 Director
Jeffrey S. Lambert..................... 33 Director
Jeffrey E. Susskind.................... 43 Director
</TABLE>
ROCCO J. FABIANO, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
Mr. Fabiano is a Founder of ACC and is the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer. In 1991, Mr. Fabiano co-founded Consumer Portfolio Services,
Inc. and acted as a consultant to that company until December 1992, at which
time he began work on the formation of ACC. He also has been the Chairman of the
Board of Far Western Bank, an Executive Vice President of Imperial Corporation
of America, Chief Operating Officer of Ameristar Mortgage Corporation and Senior
Consultant for KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Fabiano holds a BS in Genetics and an MS
in Protein Chemistry from Colorado State University and an MBA in Finance from
Cornell University.
GARY S. BURDICK, PRESIDENT. Mr. Burdick is a Founder of ACC and has
been the President since September 1995. Mr. Burdick was Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of ACC from July 1993 to September 1995. Mr. Burdick
worked from January through June of 1993 as an advisor to the Ministry of
Privatization for the Czech Republic in Prague as part of a United States State
Department Aid to Developing Nations program. From May 1991 to December 1992,
Mr. Burdick was an independent consultant and contributed time to Rebuild LA Mr.
Burdick was a Director of Prudential Securities from 1989 to April 1991. He also
has specialized in mortgage finance and asset securitizations as a Vice
President of Goldman Sachs and a Vice President of Lehman Brothers. Mr. Burdick
holds a BA in Economics and a BS in Environmental Studies from the University of
California at Santa Barbara.
RELLEN M. STEWART, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND
TREASURER. Mr. Stewart is a Founder of ACC and has been the Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of ACC since July 1993. Mr. Stewart was also
President of ACC from July 1993 to September 1995. From 1988 to July 1993, Mr.
Stewart was an Executive Vice President of EurekaBank. From 1977 to 1988, Mr.
Stewart was employed by KPMG Peat Marwick becoming a Partner in 1984 and later
becoming the firm's National Practice Director for consulting to the mortgage
industry. He also has been a Financial Analyst for Wells Fargo Bank. Mr. Stewart
holds a BS in Business Administration and an MBA in Finance from the University
of California at Berkeley.
JOHN J. CRUZ, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF CONTRACT SERVICING. Mr. Cruz
joined ACC in July 1993 as Vice President of Collections. In October 1996, Mr.
Cruz became a Senior Vice President. From July 1991 to July 1993, Mr. Cruz was
Collections Manager for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. Mr. Cruz was Vice
President and Collections Manager of Far Western Bank from 1987 to April 1991.
He also has held the position of General Manager of Pacific Coast Collections.
49
<PAGE> 52
R. FRANK MERCER, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER. Mr.
Mercer joined ACC in July 1993 as Vice President of Credit Administration. He
was promoted to Senior Vice President in May 1994 and was made Chief Credit
Officer in September 1995. Mr. Mercer worked as an independent banking
consultant and mortgage broker from December 1992 to July 1993. From 1990 to
November 1992, Mr. Mercer was a Vice President of Financial Services of Olympian
Bancorp. He also has held positions as Vice President of Consumer Loan
Operations of Imperial Savings Association, Vice President of Landmark Thrift
and Loan, Principal of RFM Financial Services and District Manager for Mellon
Financial Services.
JACK R. COHEN, VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY. Mr. Cohen
joined ACC as Vice President and Corporate Counsel in August 1995. He became
Secretary of the Company in September 1995 and General Counsel in August 1996.
Mr. Cohen was in private practice from November 1994 to July 1995. Mr. Cohen was
Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Coast to Coast Marketing, Inc.,
from February 1992 to October 1994. From May 1991 to January 1992, Mr. Cohen was
Vice President and Attorney for Republic Factors Corp. He also has been Vice
President and Senior Counsel of Imperial Savings Association, Associate Attorney
for Jennings, Engstrand and Henrikson and Law Clerk for the US Bankruptcy Court.
Mr. Cohen holds a BA in Psychology from Clark University and a JD from
University of San Diego School of Law.
ETHAN J. FALK, DIRECTOR. Mr. Falk has been a Director since February
1995. Mr. Falk has been a shareholder in the law firm of Falk & Sharp,
Professional Corporation, since 1990. Prior to founding Falk & Sharp, Mr. Falk
was a partner in the law firm of Lillick & McHose. Mr. Falk holds a BA in
Mathematics from the State University of New York at Binghamton and a JD from
the University of Michigan Law School.
JACK P. FITZPATRICK, DIRECTOR. Mr. Fitzpatrick has been a Director
since February 1995. Mr. Fitzpatrick is the Chief Financial Officer of
Multichannel Communications Sciences, Inc. and has held this position since July
1995. From July 1993 to May 1995, Mr. Fitzpatrick was the Chief Financial
Officer of Diatek/Arkive Information Systems. From 1989 to July 1993, Mr.
Fitzpatrick was the Chief Financial Officer and, later, Vice President of Sales
for Pacific Data Products. He also has held positions as Chief Financial Officer
of Syntro, Manager of Strategic Planning for Xerox and Senior Consultant for
KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Fitzpatrick holds a BA in Applied Mathematics, an MS in
Computer Science and an MBA from Harvard University.
JEFFREY S. LAMBERT, DIRECTOR. Mr. Lambert has been a Director since
July 1993. Mr. Lambert is the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of the
general partner of Strome Susskind Investment Management, LP, and Strome
Susskind Securities, LP, a member firm of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, and has held both positions since November 1993. Mr. Lambert is also
the Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Strome Susskind & Co. and has held
this position since July 1992. From 1987 to July 1992, Mr. Lambert was the Chief
Financial Officer of Kayne Anderson & Co. He also has held the position of
Senior Accountant for Oppenheim, Appell & Dixon. Mr. Lambert holds a BS in
Accounting from California State University Northridge.
JEFFREY E. SUSSKIND, DIRECTOR. Mr. Susskind has been a Director since
July 1993. Mr. Susskind is a Vice President and Director of the general partner
of Strome Susskind Investment Management, LP, and Strome Susskind Securities,
LP, and has held both positions since November 1993. Mr. Susskind is also a Vice
President and Director of Strome Susskind & Co. and has held this position since
February 1992. From 1987 to July 1992, Mr. Susskind was an Analyst with Kayne
Anderson & Co. He also has held the position of Analyst with Goldman Sachs and
with Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette. Mr. Susskind holds a BS in Economics from the
University of Pennsylvania and a JD from the University of Michigan Law School.
50
<PAGE> 53
KEY EMPLOYEES
The information set forth below describes key employees of the Company
who are not executive officers as of February 15, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Brett L. Beckerman................. 31 Vice President of Information Technology
Douglas E. Brown................... 35 Vice President of Collections
Anthony N. Fiduk................... 40 Vice President of National Accounts
Ernest M. Garcia................... 48 Vice President of Credit Administration
Shaemus A. Garland................. 31 Vice President and Controller
Michael D. LoPresti................ 44 Vice President and National Sales Manager
Tammy S. Ramos..................... 35 Vice President of Funding
</TABLE>
BRETT L. BECKERMAN, VICE PRESIDENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Mr.
Beckerman has been Vice President of Information Technology since August 1993.
From 1989 to August 1993, Mr. Beckerman was Data Processing Supervisor for LSI
Financial Group. He also has been an Operations Manager of Vision, Inc., and a
Senior Computer Operator for Quintec Insulectro. Mr. Beckerman holds a BS in
Management Information Systems from California State University at Long Beach.
DOUGLAS E. BROWN, VICE PRESIDENT OF COLLECTIONS. Mr. Brown joined ACC
in October 1993 as Collections Manager. In October 1996, Mr. Brown became Vice
President of Collections. From April 1991 to September 1993, Mr. Brown was
Collections Manager at FB Collections, a collections agency. Mr. Brown has also
been the Assistant Vice President of Collections of Far Western Bank.
ANTHONY N. FIDUK, VICE PRESIDENT OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS. Mr. Fiduk has
been ACC's Vice President of National Accounts since December 1993. From
November 1992 to November 1993, Mr. Fiduk was Finance Manager for Huntington
Beach Dodge, Inc. and from July 1992 to October 1992 was Regional Marketing
Director for Bedford Financial Corp. Mr. Fiduk was a Loan Officer with
Interstate Diversified Financial from September 1990 to June 1992. He also has
held positions as Assistant Vice President of Loan Origination's for Far Western
Bank, Credit Underwriter for Lloyd Anderson Companies and Branch Manager for
Transamerica Financial Services, Inc. Mr. Fiduk holds a BA in Economics from
University of California at San Diego.
ERNEST M. GARCIA, VICE PRESIDENT OF CREDIT ADMINISTRATION. Mr. Garcia
has been with ACC since November 1993 and became the Company's Vice President of
Credit Administration in May 1994. Mr. Garcia was an Assistant Vice President
for First Fidelity Thrift and Loan from 1989 to September 1993. He also has held
positions as Assistant Vice President for American Thrift and Loan, Branch
Manager for California Thrift and Loan and Branch Manager for Household Finance.
SHAEMUS A. GARLAND, VICE PRESIDENT AND CONTROLLER. Mr. Garland has been
the Controller of ACC since September 1995. In October 1996, Mr. Garland became
a Vice President. From November 1993 to September 1995, Mr. Garland was the
Company's Accounting Manager. Previously, Mr. Garland spent four years with the
United States Marine Corps. He holds a BS in Accounting from San Diego State
University.
51
<PAGE> 54
MICHAEL D. LOPRESTI, VICE PRESIDENT AND NATIONAL SALES MANAGER. Mr.
LoPresti has been Vice President and National Sales Manager of ACC since August
1993. From January 1992 to July 1993, Mr. LoPresti was Regional Vice President
for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. Mr. LoPresti was New Car Manager for Long
Beach Toyota from 1990 to January 1992. He also has held positions as Vice
President of Loan Origination's of Far Western Bank, General Sales Manager for
Auto Circus, Inc. and Finance Manager for Maurice J. Sopp and Son Chevrolet.
TAMMY S. RAMOS, VICE PRESIDENT OF FUNDING. Ms. Ramos has been with ACC
since February 1994 and became Vice President of Funding in March 1996. From
February 1994 to March 1996, she had been the Company's Manager of Funding. From
1987 until joining the Company in February 1994, Ms. Ramos had been an
Operations Manager for First Fidelity Thrift and Loan. She also held the
position of Operations Manager for the City of Margatte, Florida.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information contained under the caption "Executive Compensation" in the
Company's definitive Proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or before March 31, 1997, is incorporated herein by
reference to this item 11.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Information contained under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Company's definitive Proxy statement to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before March 31,
1997, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item 12.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information contained under the caption "Certain Transactions" in the
Company's definitive Proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or before March 31, 1997, is incorporated herein by
reference in response to this item 13.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31,
1996.
(c) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT SEQUENTIAL PAGE
NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBER
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
3.1 - The Company's Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the
Delaware Secretary of State on November 9, 1995, as amended(1)
3.2 - The Company's Bylaws(1)
4.1 - Trust Indenture dated November 18, 1996 between Company and
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association ("Norwest Bank")(2)
</TABLE>
52
<PAGE> 55
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10.1 - Investors Rights Agreement, dated as of July 15, 1993, by and
among the Company and certain of its shareholders(2)
10.2 - Definitive Commitment, dated July 15, 1993, by and among the
Company, Cargill Financial Services Corporation and OFL-A
Receivables ("OFL-A"), together with the First Amendment thereto
dated June 24, 1994, and the Third Amendment thereto Dated
September 29, 1995.(2)
10.3 - Master Contract Repurchase Agreement, dated July 15, 1993, by
and among the Company, Cargill Financial Services Corporation
and OFL-A, together with the First Amendment thereto dated June
24, 1994, and the Amendment thereto dated September 15, 1995,
and the Third Amendment thereto dated as of September 29,
1995.(2)
10.4 - Master Contract Servicing Agreement, dated July 15, 1993, by and
among the Company, Cargill Financial Services Corporation and
OFL-A, together with the First Amendment thereto dated June 24,
1994, and the Amendment thereto dated as of September 15,
1995.(2)
10.5 - Master Contract Custodial Agreement, dated July 15, 1993, by and
among the Company, Cargill Financial Services Corporation, OFL-A
and Norwest Bank.(2)
10.6 - Intentionally omitted
10.7 - Subordinated Certificate and Net Interest Margin Certificate
Financing Facility Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1995, by
and among OFL-A, Cargill Financial Services Corporation and
Norwest Bank, together with Supplement No. 1 thereto dated
September 15, 1995.(2)
10.8 - ACC Limited Guarantee, dated as of September 1, 1995, executed
by the Company, relating to Exhibit 10.7.(2)
10.9 - Stock Pledge and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1995, by and among the Company, Cargill Financial
Services Corporation and Norwest Bank, relating to Exhibit
10.7.(2)
10.10 - Office Lease by and between the Company and Pardee Construction
Company, dated August 6, 1993.(2)
10.11 - Lease Agreement by and among the Company, Thomas E. Orton,
Brannen/Goddard Company, and the Griffin Company, dated December
1, 1994.(2)
10.12 - The Courtyard Office Lease Agreement by and among the Company
and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, dated January 9,
1995.(2)
10.13 - Master Lease Number 137902, dated February 21, 1995, by and
between the Company and Computer Sales International, Inc.(2)
10.14 - Master Equipment Lease No. 90011, dated September 23, 1994, by
and between the Company and Cargill Leasing Corporation.(2)
10.15 - Master Lease dated June 24, 1994, by and between the Company and
Sun Data, Inc., and related purchase option.(2)
10.16 - 10.26 Intentionally omitted
10.27 - Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Rocco J.
Fabiano.(1)
10.28 - Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Gary S.
Burdick.(1)
10.29 - Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Rellen M.
Stewart.(1)
10.30 - Form of Indemnification Agreement between ACC Consumer Finance
Corporation and certain of its directors and officers.(1)
10.31 - Tax Sharing Agreement, dated July 15, 1993, between the Company
and OFL-A.(1)
10.32 - Intentionally Omitted.
</TABLE>
53
<PAGE> 56
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10.33 - The Company's 401(k) Salary Savings Plan and Trust Agreement,
effective as of February 1, 1994.(1)
10.35 - The Company's Directors' 1995 Stock Option Plan.(1)
10.36 - Consulting Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995, by and
between the Company and Strome Susskind Investment Management,
L.P.(1)
10.37 - Amendment and Waiver Concerning Existing Agreements dated as of
January 23, 1996, by and among the Company, Strome Partners,
L.P., Strome Offshore Limited, Rocco J. Fabiano, Gary S.
Burdick, Rellen M. Stewart and Cargill.(1)
10.38 - Fourth Amendment to Master Contract Repurchase Agreement dated
as of March 31, 1996, by and among Norwest Bank, Cargill and
OFL-A.(1)
10.39 - Third Amendment to Investor Rights Agreement dated as of March
31, 1996, by and among the Company, Strome Partners, L.P.,
Strome Offshore Limited, Rocco J. Fabiano, Gary S. Burdick,
Rellen M. Stewart and Cargill.(1)
10.40 - First Amendment to Subordinated Certificate and Net Interest
Margin Certificate Financing Facility Agreement.(1)
10.47 - Equipment Lease dated November 8, 1995, by and between the
Company and Sun Data, Inc., and related purchase option.(1)
10.48 - Agreement of Lease dated March 1996 by and between American
Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. and the Company.(1)
10.49 - Sublease dated April 1996 by and between the Company and First
Fidelity Thrift & Loan Association.(1)
10.56 - Presidential Circle Standard Office Lease by and between the
Company and Colony Presidential Partners, LP, dated June 11,
1996.(1)
10.57 - Office Building Lease by and between the Company and Plaza
Holdings, Inc., dated August 23, 1996.(2)
10.58 - 10.61 Intentionally omitted
10.62 - Agreement dated January 31, 1997, among Company, OFL-A and
Cargill Financial Services Corp.
10.63 - Third Amendment of Subordinated Certificates Net Invest Margin
Certificate Financing Facility dated January 31, 1997, among
Company, OFL-A Cargill and Norwest Bank
11.1 - Statement of Computation of Weighted Average Shares Outstanding.
12.1 - Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios
21.1 - List of Subsidiaries.
23.1 - Consent of Independent Auditors
27.1 - Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
(1) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Commission in the
Company Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-98626).
(2) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Commission in the
Company Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-12605).
(d) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
54
<PAGE> 57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
By: /s/ Rocco J. Fabiano
_______________________________
Rocco J. Fabiano
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: March 26, 1997
____________________________
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been duly signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Rocco Fabiano
____________________________
Rocco Fabiano
Chairman of the Board
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Rellen M. Stewart
____________________________
Rellen M. Stewart
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Shaemus A. Garland
____________________________
Shaemus A. Garland
Vice President and Controller
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Jack P. Fitzpatrick
____________________________
Jack P. Fitzpatrick
Director
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Ethan J. Falk
____________________________
Ethan J. Falk
Director
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Lambert
____________________________
Jeffrey S. Lambert
Director
55
<PAGE> 58
Date: March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Susskind
____________________________
Jeffrey S. Susskind
Director
56
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.62
AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of January 31, 1997, is made and
entered into among CARGILL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation ("CFSC"), ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
(as successor to American Credit Corporation) ("ACC"), and OFL-A RECEIVABLES
CORP., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of ACC
("Receivables").
WHEREAS, CFSC, ACC and Receivables are parties to a Definitive
Commitment dated July 15, 1993, as amended by the First Amendment to Definitive
Commitment dated as of June 24, 1994, the Second Amendment to Definitive
Commitment dated as of May 5, 1995, and the Third Amendment to Definitive
Commitment dated as of September 29, 1995 (collectively, the "Definitive
Commitment"), pursuant to which, and subject to the other credit facility
documents, including the Master Contract Repurchase Agreement, Master Servicing
Agreement and Master Custodial Agreement, CFSC has extended a repurchase
financing facility to Receivables ("Repurchase Facility").
WHEREAS, subject to earlier termination in certain situations, the
commitment period in the Repurchase Facility expires on July 15, 1998.
WHEREAS, Receivables and ACC desire to acquire the Option (as defined
in Section 2) to terminate the Repurchase Facility on or before May 31, 1997,
upon the terms of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein
contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS. All terms with initial capitalized letters that are not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Definitive Commitment and in the Master Contract Repurchase Agreement.
2. OPTION TO TERMINATE THE REPURCHASE FACILITY. Receivables and ACC shall have
the option ("Option") to terminate the Repurchase Facility at any time on or
before May 31, 1997. Receivables and ACC may exercise this Option by notifying
CFSC of its exercise of the option as of a stated termination date at least
fourteen (14) calendar days prior to such stated termination date. On the stated
termination date which shall constitute a Repurchase Date established pursuant
to subsection (i) of the definition of Repurchase Date set forth in the Master
Contract Repurchase Agreement, Receivables shall repurchase from CFSC the
balance of Contracts sold to CFSC pursuant to the Master Contract Repurchase
Agreement at the Repurchase Price and in accordance with
1.
<PAGE> 2
the terms and conditions of the Master Contract Repurchase Agreement. ACC and
CFSC shall use reasonable efforts to coordinate the termination of the
Repurchase Facility with the initial funding under the credit facility obtained
by ACC or an affiliate to replace the Repurchase Facility so that the proceeds
of the replacement credit facility may be used by Receivables to pay CFSC all
amounts due under the Repurchase Facility. In connection with the payment in
full of and the termination of the Repurchase Facility, as contemplated herein
only the Repurchase Price shall not include any Base Repurchase Agreement Fee or
Extension Repurchase Fee. The Option shall lapse if (a) not exercised on or
before May 31, 1997 or (b) all amounts due CFSC under the Repurchase Facility
are not paid in full on or before May 31, 1997. If the Option lapses, then the
Definitive Commitment and other credit facility documents shall continue in full
force and effect, without any amendment except as otherwise set forth in this
Agreement.
3. STOCK ISSUANCE. In consideration of the Option and the other covenants of
CFSC, ACC shall newly issue and deliver to CFSC as of the date of this
Agreement, 174,500 unregistered, fully paid, nonassessable shares of its common
stock, $.001 par value ("Newly Issued Shares"), free and clear of any liens or
encumbrances of any kind. The stock certificate representing the Newly Issued
Share shall be stamped with the same restrictive legend as the common stock of
ACC already owned by CFSC. In addition, ACC covenants that it shall amend the
Investors Rights Agreement dated as of July 15, 1993, as amended ("Investors
Rights Agreement") to include the Newly Issued Shares as "Registrable
Securities" thereunder and CFSC shall be the "Holder" of such Registrable
Securities.
4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES. CFSC hereby represents and warrants to ACC as
follows: (i) that it is acquiring the Common Stock for investment and not with a
present view to distribution; (ii) that CFSC is an accredited investor as
defined in Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended; (iii) that CFSC did not receive any solicitations or advertising in
connection with the issuance of the Common Stock; and (iv) that CFSC is relying
solely upon its own due diligence in connection with the acquisition of the
Common Stock and its valuation of the Common Stock and is not relying upon any
representations or warranties of ACC or any third party. CFSC acknowledges that
ACC has not publicly disclosed the transaction contemplated by this Agreement
and CFSC agrees that it will not trade on any material nonpublic information
relating to ACC that it acquires as a result of the negotiation of this
Agreement.
5. REPURCHASE PRICE CREDIT. In the event that the Option is not exercised, then
the Common Stock (valued as set forth herein) shall be credited against any Base
Repurchase Agreement Fee and Extension Repurchase Fee payable to CFSC under the
Definitive Commitment or Master Repurchase Agreement after May 31, 1997. For
purposes of the credit only, the Common Stock will be valued at the closing bid
of ACC Common Stock
2.
<PAGE> 3
on the Nasdaq National Stock Market on January 31, 1996, as reported in the
WALL STREET JOURNAL, which was $10.88 per share.
6. OTHER CONSEQUENCES OF TERMINATION OF REPURCHASE FACILITY. If the Option is
exercised and the Repurchase Facility is terminated, then (i) CFSC shall no
longer serve as a sponsor on behalf of ACC, Receivables or ACC Receivables
Corp., a Delaware corporation, in connection with any future asset
securitization transactions (although CFSC will continue to serve as sponsor for
any transactions done prior to the termination) and (ii) CFSC shall continue to
serve as a counterparty to ACC or Receivables in any hedging transactions that
ACC elects to engage on substantially the same terms as its current arrangement
so long as CFSC's commitment under the Subordinated Certificate and Net Interest
Margin Certificate Financing Facility Agreement dated as of September 1, 1995,
as amended by the First Amendment to the Subordinated Certificate and Net
Interest Margin Certificate Financing Facility Agreement dated as of March 31,
1996, and amended by the Second Amendment to Net Interest Margin Certificate
Financing Facility Agreement dated as of August 30, 1996 (collectively, the "NIM
Facility Agreement"), remains open and CFSC and Receivables shall enter into an
amendment to the NIM Facility Agreement or enter into an agreement reflecting
the current hedging arrangement; PROVIDED, that repayment provisions and
perfected security interests in collateral, in each case acceptable to CFSC, are
incorporated into such arrangement.
7. NIM FACILITY AMENDMENT. Concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, the
parties shall enter into a Third Amendment to the NIM Facility Agreement in the
form of Exhibit "A" hereto ("Amendment"). Pursuant to the Amendment, CFSC's
maximum commitment under the NIM Facility Agreement shall be reduced to
$10,000,000, and the annual commitment fee shall be reduced to $100,000, payable
quarterly. This Amendment shall be effective immediately and shall not be
affected by whether the Option is exercised or lapses.
8. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement is intended to be a binding agreement upon the
parties hereto and constitutes the entire agreement among the parties relating
to the subject matter hereof. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement,
this Agreement does not alter, now or in the future upon the exercise or lapse
of the Option, any rights or obligations between or among the parties hereto or
affiliates of the parties hereto under any existing agreements (including
without limitation, the master equipment finance lease with Cargill Leasing
Corporation) which shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall
be governed and construed in accordance with the internal laws of Minnesota.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when
so delivered shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.
3.
<PAGE> 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this
Agreement to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer on the
date first set forth above.
"CFSC"
CARGILL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Z. Hilligoss
--------------------------------
Jeffrey A.Z. Hilligoss
Vice President
"ACC"
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation,
By: /s/ Rocco J. Fabiano
--------------------------------
Rocco J. Fabiano
Director and CEO
"Receivables"
OFL-A RECEIVABLES CORP.,
a Delaware corporation,
By: /s/ Rocco J. Fabiano
--------------------------------
Rocco J. Fabiano
Director
4.
<PAGE> 5
Acknowledgment:
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, acknowledges that it has
received a copy of the Agreement dated as of January 31, 1997, among Cargill
Financial Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation, ACC Consumer Finance
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and OFL-A Receivables Corp., a Delaware
corporation, and is aware of the option to terminate the Repurchase Facility.
NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA,
National Association
By: /s/ Bruce C. Wondersee
--------------------------
Bruce C. Wondersee
Corporate Trust Officer
5.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.63
THIRD AMENDMENT
TO
SUBORDINATED CERTIFICATE AND
NET INTEREST MARGIN CERTIFICATE
FINANCING FACILITY AGREEMENT
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SUBORDINATED CERTIFICATE AND NET INTEREST
MARGIN CERTIFICATE FINANCING FACILITY AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), dated as of
January 31, 1997, by and among CARGILL FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, (the "Lender"), OFL-A RECEIVABLES CORP., a Delaware
corporation and a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of ACC Consumer Finance
Corporation (as successor to American Credit Corporation) (the "Borrower"), and
NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, as
paying agent (the "Paying Agent"), amends that certain Subordinated Certificate
and Net Interest Margin Certificate Financing Facility Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1995, by and among the Lender, the Borrower, and the Paying Agent,
as amended by the First Amendment dated as of March 31, 1996 and the Second
Amendment dated as of August 30, 1996 (collectively, the "SNIM Agreement").
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the SNIM Facility in
certain respects.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein
contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 1.
(a) The definition of "Annual Commitment Fee" is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:
"Annual Commitment Fee" means $100,000 per annum, payable in
accordance with Section 7(c) hereof."
(b) The definition of "Collateral Event" is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:
"Collateral Event" means, with respect to any Eligible Contracts
financed under the Repurchase Facility or any Eligible Contract
Pool, the occurrence of any of the following events during any
Monthly Period: (a) a trailing three-month annualized net
charge-off rate equal to or greater than ten
1.
<PAGE> 2
percent (10.00%), (b) a trailing six-month annualized net
charge-off rate equal to or greater than nine percent (9.00%), (c)
a trailing three-month delinquency rate equal to or greater than
nine percent (9.00%), (d) a trailing six-month delinquency rate
equal to or greater than eight percent (8.00%), (e) a trailing
three-month annualized repossession rate equal to or greater than
eighteen percent (18.00%), or (f) a trailing six month annualized
repossession rate equal to or greater than seventeen percent
(17.00%).
(c) The definition of "Financing Facility Maximum Amount" is hereby
amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Financing Facility Maximum Amount" means the lesser of (a) the sum
of Aggregate Borrowing Base and accrued and unpaid Commitment Fees,
Paying Agent Fees and other fees or expenses owing to the Lender
hereunder, and (b) $10,000,000.
2. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2.
(a) Section 2(a)(xv) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
(xv) After the making of such Advance, each of the following tests
shall be satisfied: (A) the Aggregate Facility Balance shall not
exceed $10,000,000, and (B) the Aggregate Facility Balance shall
not equal or exceed the Aggregate Borrowing Base;
3. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 7(c)
(a) Section 7(c) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
(c) Until the later of the Advance Termination Date and the date
upon which the Aggregate Facility Balance shall have been reduced
to zero (after giving effect to the application of the deemed Cash
Receipt pursuant to the next sentence), the Borrower shall pay to
the Lender the Annual Commitment Fee as follows: $25,000 on the
last day of each calendar quarter, beginning with March 31, 1997.
Notwithstanding the above, if the Borrower's obligation to pay the
Annual Commitment Fee terminates in accordance with the preceding
sentence on any day (other than the last day of a calendar quarter,
in which case, no $25,000 payment shall be required), then that
portion of the Annual Commitment Fee paid by the Borrower but not
earned by the Lender (based upon the actual number of days
remaining in such quarter divided by the actual number of days in
such quarter) shall be deemed to be a Cash Receipt and applied
against the Aggregate Facility Balance in accordance with Section
2(g) hereof.
2.
<PAGE> 3
4. MISCELLANEOUS. All provisions of the SNIM Agreement, other than those
expressly amended by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. This
Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so
delivered shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this
Amendment to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer on the
date first set forth above.
The "Lender":
CARGILL FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Z. Hilligoss
-----------------------------
Jeffrey A.Z. Hilligoss
Vice President
The "Borrower":
OFL-A RECEIVABLES CORP.,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Rocco J. Fabiano
-----------------------------
Rocco J. Fabiano
Director
The "Paying Agent":
NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
a national banking association
By: /s/ Bruce Wandersee
-------------------------
Bruce Wandersee
Corporate Trust Officer
3.
<PAGE> 4
Acknowledgment:
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and successor
by merger of American Credit Corporation, hereby consents to the foregoing
amendments to the SNIM Agreement and confirms that its ACC Limited Guarantee
dated as of September 1, 1995, issued in favor of Lender applies to the SNIM
Agreement, as amended by the foregoing Third Amendment dated as of January 31,
1997.
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE
CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
By: /s/ Rocco J. Fabiano
---------------------------
Rocco J. Fabiano
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
4.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 11.1
ACC CONSUMER FINANCE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF WEIGHTED SHARES OUTSTANDING
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996
ISSUE DATE PRIMARY FULLY DILUTED
---------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Shares Outstanding at Beginning of Period 6,284,565 6,284,565
Issuance of Preferred Stock 1/23/96 7,913 7,913
Employee Stock Options
Treasury Stock Method 11/30/95 23,413 61,504
Employee Stock Options
Treasury Stock Method 1/23/96 6,206 11,135
Common Stock 5/16/96 1,218,579 1,218,579
Employee Stock Options
Treasury Stock Method 7/23/96 1,695 4,780
--------- -----------
Weighted Average Shares at End of Period 7,542,371 7,588,476
========= ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995
ISSUE DATE PRIMARY FULLY DILUTED
---------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Shares Outstanding at Beginning of Period 5,033,343 5,033,343
Convertible Preferred Stock Warrants
Treasury Stock Method 7/15/93 216,526 229,485
Issuance of Preferred Stock 3/28/95 202,120 265,373
Issuance of Preferred Stock 9/30/95 209,057 209,057
--------- -----------
Weighted Average Shares at End of Period 5,661,046 5,737,258
========= ===========
</TABLE>
1.
<PAGE> 1
Exhibit 12.1
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ending Year Ending
December 31, 1996 December 31, 1995
------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Expense $4,610,963 $4,199,336
Allocated rents 271,907 184,752
------------------- -------------------
4,882,870 4,384,088
Net Income Before Taxes 8,791,691 3,675,355
Fixed Charges 4,882,870 4,384,088
------------------- -------------------
$13,674,561 $8,059,443
Earnings to Fixed Charges Ratio 2.80 1.84
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
OFL-A Receivables Corp.
ACC Receivables Corp.
1.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
The Board of Directors
ACC Consumer Finance Corporation:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-17047 and No. 333-17039) on Form S-8 of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation of
our report dated January 26, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, the
six-month transition period ended December 31, 1994 and the period from July 15,
1993 (inception) through June 30, 1994, which report appears in the December 31,
1996, annual report on Form 10-K of ACC Consumer Finance Corporation.
/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Diego, California KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 11,016,071
<SECURITIES> 7,832,174
<RECEIVABLES> 3,554,822
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 25,516,180
<PP&E> 1,765,158
<DEPRECIATION> (624,633)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 64,633,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 20,818,943
<BONDS> 19,294,731
0
0
<COMMON> 19,940,117
<OTHER-SE> 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 64,633,390
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 29,412,644
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (14,896,921)
<LOSS-PROVISION> (1,113,069)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> (4,610,963)
<INCOME-PRETAX> 8,791,691
<INCOME-TAX> (3,692,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 5,099,691
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 5,099,691
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.68
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.67
</TABLE>
