<PAGE> 1
SEPTEMBER 18, 2000 SUPPLEMENT TO THE MAY 1, 2000 PROSPECTUS FOR
TRAVELERS PORTFOLIO ARCHITECT.
The following information replaces page 29 of the Prospectus.
DISTRIBUTION OF VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACTS
The Company intends to sell the Contracts in all jurisdictions where it is
licensed to do business and where the Contract is approved. Any sales
representative or employee associated with a broker-dealer who sells the
Contracts will be qualified to sell variable annuities under applicable federal
and state laws. Each broker-dealer is registered with the SEC under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all are members of the NASD. The Contract
is offered through both affiliated and non-affiliated broker-dealers. The
principal underwriter of the Contract is CFBDS, Inc. 21 Milk Street, Boston, MA.
CFBDS is not affiliated with the Company or the Separate Account. However, it is
currently anticipated that Travelers Distribution LLC (TDC), One Tower Square,
Hartford, Connecticut 06183, an affiliated broker-dealer, may become the
principal underwriter for the Contracts sometime in 2000.
Up-front commission paid to broker-dealers will not exceed 7% of the purchase
payments made under the Contracts. If asset-based compensation is paid, it will
not exceed 2% of the average account value annually. In addition, Tower Square
Securities, Inc., an affiliate of the Company receives additional incentive
payments from the Company relating to its sale of the Contracts. From time to
time, the Company may pay or permit other promotional incentives, in cash,
credit or other compensation.
CONFORMITY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS
The Contract is governed by the laws of the state in which it is delivered.
Where a state has not approved a contract feature or funding option, it will not
be available in that state. Any paid-up annuity, cash surrender value or death
benefits that are available under the Contract are not less than the minimum
benefits required by the statutes of the state in which the Contract is
delivered. We reserve the right to make any changes, including retroactive
changes, in the Contract to the extent that the change is required to meet the
requirements of any law or regulation issued by any governmental agency to which
the Company, the Contract or the contract owner is subject.
VOTING RIGHTS
The Company is the legal owner of the shares of the funding options. However, we
believe that when a funding option solicits proxies in conjunction with a vote
of shareholders we are required to obtain from you and from other owners
instructions on how to vote those shares. When we receive those instructions, we
will vote all of the shares we own in proportion to those instructions. This
will also include any shares we own on our own behalf. Should we determine that
we are no longer required to comply with the above, we will vote on the shares
in our own right.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND OPINIONS
Legal matters in connection with the federal laws and regulations affecting the
issue and sale of the contract described in this prospectus, as well as the
organization of the Companies, their authority to issue variable annuity
contracts under Connecticut law and the validity of the forms of the variable
annuity contracts under Connecticut law, have been passed on by the General
Counsel of the Company.
THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY
There are no pending legal proceedings affecting the Separate Account. There is
one material pending legal proceeding, other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to business, to which the Company is a party.
In March 1997, a purported class action entitled Patterman v. The Travelers,
Inc., et al. was commenced in the Superior Court of Richmond County, Georgia,
alleging, among other things, violations of the Georgia RICO statute and other
state laws by an affiliate of the Company, Primerica Financial Services, Inc.
and certain of its affiliates. Plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory and
punitive damages and other relief. In October 1997, defendants answered the
complaint, denied liability and asserted numerous affirmative defenses. In
February 1998, on defendants' motion, the Superior Court of Richmond County
transferred the lawsuit to the Superior
L-12907-SUPP
29
