<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D C 20549
FORM 10-K
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996
Commission file number 0-27564
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware 13-3841601
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) identification No.)
7076 South Alton Way, Building H 80112
Englewood, Colorado (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive office)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (303) 290-0214
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of Each Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
-------- --------
<PAGE> 2
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant based upon the average of the closing high and low price of
the Common Stock as of March 25, 1997 (as reported by the Nasdaq) was
approximately $71,203,125 (See Item 12). On that date, there were 11,625,000
shares of 3-D Geophysical, Inc. Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Items 10 through 13 of Part III hereof is
incorporated by reference to the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be
filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the General Rules and
Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Regulation
14A"), not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December
31, 1996.
2
<PAGE> 3
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PART I.
Page
----------
<S> <C>
Item 1. Business 4-11
Item 2. Properties 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings 11-12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 12
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data 13
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation 14-20
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 21-42
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 43
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant 44
Item 11. Executive Compensation 44
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 44
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions 44
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K 45-47
Signatures 48
Financial Data Schedule 49
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE> 4
PART I.
Item 1. Business
GENERAL
3-D Geophysical, Inc. was formed in March, 1995 to facilitate the
acquisition and consolidation of land-based and shallow water seismic data
acquisition businesses. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references
herein to the "Company" or to "3-D Geophysical" mean 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, the principal ones of which operate two seismic data
acquisition businesses (collectively, the "Operating Subsidiaries") -
Geovaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. ("Geovaluaciones") and Northern Geophysical of
America, Inc. ("Northern"). In addition, the Company processes seismic data
through another subsidiary, Procesos Interactivos Avanzados, S.A. de C.V.
("PIASA"). Concurrently with the consummation of the Company's initial public
offering (the "Initial Public Offering") in February 1996, 3-D Geophysical
acquired Geoevaluaciones, Northern, Paragon Geophysical, Inc. ("Paragon") and
Kemp Geophysical Corporation ("Kemp"). In December 1996, Paragon and Kemp were
merged with and into Northern. In this document, unless otherwise indicated,
references to "dollars", "U.S.$", and "$" are to United States dollars,
references to pesos and "N$" are to Mexican pesos and references to "Canadian
dollars" and "C$" are to Canadian dollars, and the terms "United States" and
"U.S." mean the United States of America, its states, territories and
possessions and all areas subject to its jurisdiction.
Geoevaluaciones and PIASA, Mexican corporations, were organized in
1977 and 1993, respectively. For accounting purposes, the acquisition of
Geoevaluaciones and PIASA has been treated as a recapitalization of
Geoevaluaciones and PIASA with Geoevaluaciones (combined with PIASA) as the
acquiror of 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and, therefore, as the predecessor company
(the "Predecessor Company").
3-D Geophysical, Inc. is one of the leading providers of land-based
and shallow water 3-D and 2-D seismic data acquisition services to the oil and
gas industry in the Western Hemisphere. As of February 28, 1997 the Company's
10 crews operated land-based and shallow water seismic data acquisition
systems, primarily utilizing state-of-the-art, 24-bit equipment, with a total
of approximately 18,000 channels, in Alaska, the Rocky Mountain, West Coast and
Appalachian regions and in Canada and Mexico.
The seismic data acquisition services industry is currently
experiencing several significant changes, including a continuing consolidation
of service providers. The Company believes that this consolidation is due in
part to the trend by oil and gas exploration and production companies to rely
on third-party seismic contractors to provide increasingly more sophisticated
and extensive 3-D seismic surveys. These surveys require a greater number of
recording channels and therefore substantial capital expenditures. This trend
is rationalizing the seismic services industry and creating a competitive
advantage for companies with extensive 3-D channel capacity and greater
financial resources.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company's objective is to capitalize on the consolidation taking
place in its industry to enhance its position as one of the leading providers
of land-based and shallow water seismic data acquisition services and to become
a significant provider of related services to the oil and gas industry in the
Western hemisphere. The Company intends to achieve this objective by:
o Optimizing the utilization of its state-of-the-art seismic data
acquisition systems by relocating equipment and crews among the
regions in which the Company operates;
o Expanding its operations in Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America
by seeking further contract opportunities with Petroleos Mexicanos
("PEMEX") and other oil companies operating in Latin America;
o Pursuing opportunities in the United States, including Alaska, by
attempting to strengthen existing business relationships with
multinational companies and their affiliates, such as Atlantic
Richfield Company
4
<PAGE> 5
("ARCO"), BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. ("BP Alaska"), Marathon
Oil Company ("Marathon") and others; and
o Pursuing strategic acquisitions by seeking to acquire providers
of seismic data acquisition and related services, such as J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited ("J.R.S. Exploration"), that
complement the Company's geographic market coverage and growth
strategy.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
Seismic data is the principal source of information used by
geoscientists to map potential or existing oil and gas bearing formations and
the geologic structures that surround them. Seismic data is acquired over a
specified area by deploying a network of electronic cables over the area to
which electronic receivers, or geophones, are attached. Once this network is
deployed, an energy source, such as vibroseis or dynamite, is used to generate
seismic waves through a pre-determined set of frequencies that move through the
rock formation under the area and reverberate back to the surface in
milliseconds. The geophones capture the changing velocity and character of
these seismic waves as they travel down and back through the earth's surface
and transmit this information a short distance along a channel to a remote
signal conditioner. The remote signal conditioner digitizes the analog data and
transmits it to a central electronics unit that stores the acquired data. The
data is then sent to a processing center where mathematical algorithms are
applied to separate signals from interference and to correct distortion.
Migration techniques are also applied to produce a spatial representation of
the subsurface formations that were surveyed. After processing, the data is
transferred to a computer workstation that allows the data to be viewed and
reconfigured by a geoscientist who interprets the data with computer-aided
exploration techniques in order to plot features and map the structures of the
subsurface area.
In the past, a 2-D survey was the standard technique utilized to
acquire seismic data. 2-D seismic data can be visualized as a single vertical
plane of subsurface information. 3-D seismic surveys produce data that is best
visualized as a cube of information that can be sliced into numerous planes.
Thus, 3-D surveys provide different views of subsurface geologic structure and
much higher resolution of the structure than is available from a 2-D survey and
have proven to be more reliable indicators of the oil and gas potential in the
area surveyed. As a result, drilling based on 3-D seismic surveys has improved
the economics of finding oil and gas. Consequently, demand for 3-D seismic
surveys, and for surveys that cover wide areas and utilize a greater number of
channels, has increased in the past several years. Furthermore, due to the
enhanced information provided, 3-D surveys have proven to be a cost effective
and efficient tool for oil and gas exploration and, increasingly, the
development of existing reserves.
The oil and gas industry relies upon seismic data for the exploration
of new oil and gas reserves and for delineating the size and structure of
previously identified oil and gas fields to improve the development of those
fields. Seismic data, once acquired and processed, results in
computer-generated representations of the earth's subsurface. 2-D seismic data
is collected in a linear fashion along the surface of the earth (typically
using 120 recording channels). The acquisition of 3-D seismic data involves the
use of at least 480 recording channels, allows a greater volume of seismic data
to be gathered and yields dense, 3-D grids, with a higher degree of resolution
of the earth's subsurface than a 2-D seismic survey can produce.
The amount of data that can be acquired and the ability to record,
process and represent seismic data are dependent upon the type of equipment
used during the seismic data acquisition process. Seismic acquisition systems
are either traditional or distributed systems. In traditional systems, such as
a DFS-VTM system, signals received from the energy source are transmitted to a
central electronics unit in analog (nondigital) form with each channel
requiring its own set of wires, consequently increasing the cable weight.
Traditional systems are limited to 480 channels and are used primarily for 2-D
seismic surveys. The traditional system uses a 16-bit converter to translate
signals from analog to digital data. This technology cannot eliminate
distortion of the signal that may be caused by noise in the area or weaknesses
in the signal if it is remote from the central electronics unit.
Alternatively, in a state-of-the-art distributed system, received
signals are amplified, filtered and converted into digital data by means of a
24-bit analog-to-digital converter at remote signal conditioners before they
are transmitted to the central electronics unit on a single set of wires.
Certain distributed systems can be expanded to approximately 10,000 channels,
although the Company believes that the average distributed system currently
used in the land-based seismic data acquisition industry is significantly less
than 10,000 channels. The 24-bit analog-to-digital converter extends the
5
<PAGE> 6
decibel range of seismic recording and reduces system distortion to provide
superior signal fidelity. This technological innovation provides higher
resolution data, which is especially beneficial for 3-D surveys in geologically
complex or noisy areas, and substantially reduces power consumption.
Distributed systems have flexible configuration capability and improved digital
signal quality. In addition, the lighter weight cables allow a crew to acquire
greater volumes of data, as required in 3-D surveys, over a wider area with
fewer people and in less time. Distributed systems are used primarily for 3-D
surveys.
SEISMIC DATA ACQUISITION SERVICES
The Company is engaged in land-based and shallow water seismic data
acquisition on a contract basis for its customers. Seismic data acquisition
projects typically begin at the time a customer requests the Company to
formulate a proposal to acquire seismic data on the customer's behalf. The
Company's geophysicists work with the customer in designing the specifications
of the proposed survey and, once the specifications are agreed upon, the survey
is taken to the field where one or more of the Company's crews commence the
process of acquiring data.
As of February 28, 1997, the Company operated a total of 10 working
seismic crews which were utilizing state-of-the-art, 24-bit seismic data
acquisition systems with a total of approximately 18,000 channels. Of the 10
crews, one operated in Mexico, two in Alaska, four in the remainder of the
United States and three in Canada. Each crew is either land transportable or
heliportable, or both. The Company attempts to shift entire crews and equipment
from one geographic location to another in order to capitalize on the varying
seismic operating seasons in the Company's regions of operation and to maximize
the Company's efficient use of human resources and equipment. Most of the
Company's data acquisition systems, which include remote signal conditioners,
cables, geophones and central electronics units, can be readily interchanged
and relocated, depending upon the needs of the Company's customers.
A seismic crew typically consists of a supervisor, permitting agents
who secure permission to enter a landowner's property, surveyors who mark the
locations for the placement of geophones and other equipment, general laborers
who place and move the geophones and other equipment, a drill crew to drill
holes and shooters to detonate the dynamite, if dynamite is used as the energy
source, or a vibroseis crew to operate the vibroseis trucks, if vibroseis is
used as the energy source, and an observer who operates the central electronics
unit and controls the recording of the seismic data. A fully staffed seismic
crew in the United States typically has from 10 to 25 personnel for 2-D seismic
surveys and from 20 to 60 personnel for 3-D seismic surveys, depending upon the
size and nature of the survey requested by the customer. Vehicles assigned to
each crew consist of a recording truck, two or more cable and geophone trucks,
a dynamite or vibroseis truck, several personnel vehicles with off-road
capability and, where necessary, helicopters.
The Company utilizes helicopters to facilitate seismic data
acquisition in a wide range of terrains, including terrain that is inaccessible
by wheeled or tracked vehicles. The Company's experience is that helicopter use
reduces the overall cost and environmental impact of seismic data acquisition
projects through improved productivity, as crew and equipment can be more
rapidly deployed with less surface disturbance.
SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION
The processing of seismic data involves the conversion of such data,
by means of sophisticated computer software designed for this purpose, into
graphic representations of cross-sections of the earth's subsurface. PIASA and
Geoevaluaciones currently provide data processing and interpretation services
to PEMEX and the Company has opened a processing center at its branch location
in Peru. The Company intends to expand its processing and interpretation
capacity in the future and to offer such services to its customers in other
geographic regions. However, the Company has not yet developed a formal
business plan to implement this intention, and there can be no assurance that
any such attempted expansion will be successful.
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF OPERATION
The Company's seismic data acquisition operations are conducted
throughout the United States (including Alaska) and in Mexico and Canada.
Geoevaluaciones primarily conducts its operations in Mexico and provides its
primary customer, PEMEX, a full complement of seismic data acquisition,
processing and interpretation services and
6
<PAGE> 7
reservoir characterization. The Company has established a presence in Peru by
opening a branch office and a seismic data processing center, entering into a
contract with ARCO which contract has been indefinitely delayed, and bidding on
several contracts to provide seismic data acquisition services. See Item 7 -
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
The following table presents certain pro forma financial information
about the operations of the Company during the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1996
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, 1995 December 31, 1996
------------------- --------------------
(Pro Forma) (Pro Forma)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues 37,835 100.0% 55,577 100.0%
United States 28,010 74.0% 43,196 77.7%
Latin America 9,825 26.0% 12,381 22.3%
Operating income 1,175 100.0% 1,273 100.0%
United States (982) (83.6%) 2,344 184.1%
Latin America 2,157 183.6% (1,071) (84.1%)
Total assets * * 77,266 100.0%
United States * * 62,353 80.7%
Latin America * * 14,913 19.3%
</TABLE>
The information above gives effect to the acquisitions of Northern, Paragon and
Kemp as if such acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 1995.
*Not applicable
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
There are many competitors in the land-based seismic data acquisition
business and substantial financial and other resources are required to maintain
the state-of-the-art technology necessary to permit effective competition in
bidding for contracts. Seismic data acquisition technology has progressed
rapidly over recent years and the Company expects this trend to continue. The
cost of sophisticated seismic data acquisition equipment and related crew
training has increased significantly over the last several years. The cost of
equipping a crew with a state-of-the-art system, such as an I/O SYSTEM TWO(TM)
(including training and ancillary equipment), can range from approximately $3.0
to $10.0 million, the largest component of which is attributable to the channel
boxes. The Company's strategy is to update its data acquisition systems as
often as necessary to maintain its competitive position. There can be no
assurance that the Company will have the capital necessary to upgrade its
equipment to maintain its competitive position or to acquire any additional
required equipment, or that any required financing therefore will be available
on favorable terms. Furthermore, the Company may require additional capital
expenditures in the event that the level of its operations increases
significantly. If the Company is unable to raise the capital necessary to
update or increase the capacity of its data acquisition systems to the extent
necessary, it will be unable to update such systems or increase its level of
operations and may be materially and adversely affected as a result.
OPERATING CONDITIONS
The Company's crews often conduct operations in extreme weather, in
difficult terrain that is not easily accessible and under other hazardous
conditions. Accordingly, the Company's operations are subject to risks of
injury to personnel and loss of equipment. Fixed costs, including costs
associated with operating leases, labor costs and depreciation, account for
more than half of the Company's costs and expenses. As a result, low
productivity resulting from weather interruptions, equipment failures or other
causes such as fires and accidental explosions resulting from the handling of
equipment and supplies can result in significant operating losses. In addition,
while the Company has insurance policies that protect it against liabilities
that may be incurred in the ordinary course of its business, the Company is
unable to insure fully against all possible loss or liability. For example, no
insurance is available at a cost deemed reasonable by the Company for war,
nationalization, appropriation or other extreme events.
7
<PAGE> 8
The Company's seismic data acquisition operations historically have
been subject to seasonal fluctuations, with the greatest volume of data
acquisition occurring during the summer and fall in the United States. The
consolidation of the Operating Subsidiaries and its expansion into Latin
America and Canada has enabled the Company to deploy its crews and utilize its
equipment in disparate regions. As a result, the Company expects to conduct its
operations year round with fewer days of down-time caused by inclement weather
by working during the favorable operating seasons of different regions. The
Company believes that by widening the geographical scope of its operations, the
impact of seasonal fluctuations may be reduced.
MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS
Marketing. The Company markets to existing customers on a regional
basis in order to preserve these long-term relationships. The Company has
established a corporate marketing center in Englewood, Colorado, which is
responsible for (i) coordinating marketing and communication activities, (ii)
expanding the Company's marketing to integrated and multinational oil and gas
companies, and (iii) standardizing and coordinating submission of bids.
Contracts. The Company provides its services to customers pursuant to
contracts which are occasionally varied or modified by mutual consent. In many
instances, such contracts are cancelable by the customer on short notice
without penalty. Contracts are obtained by the Company either through
competitive bidding, in response to invitations for bids, or by direct
negotiation with a prospective customer.
Most of the Company's contracts result from competitive bidding. Most
frequently, customers invite bidders to provide quotations on the cost to
gather seismic data for a specified region within a specified period of time.
Some customers, primarily large oil companies, require at least three bids in
order to award a contract. Contracts are awarded primarily on the basis of
price, crew experience and equipment availability, technological expertise and
reputation for dependability and safety.
Contract terms, whether bid or negotiated, generally provide for
payment by the customer on either a "turnkey" or a "term" basis or on a
combination of both methods. Under a turnkey contract, payments for data
acquisition services are based upon a fixed fee for each unit of data
collected, and the Company bears substantially all of the risk of business
interruption due to inclement weather and other hazards. Term contracts, on the
other hand, provide for payment based on agreed rates per unit of time, which
may be expressed in periods ranging from days to months, and most of the risk
of business interruption (except for interruptions caused by failure of the
Company's equipment) is borne by the customer. A combination turnkey and term
contract provides for the Company and the customers to share the risk of
business interruption in an agreed percentage. In each case, progress payments
are usually required unless it is anticipated that the job will be completed in
less than 30 days.
Geoevaluaciones' contracts are procured from a bidding process that is
regulated by Mexican law. PEMEX, as a government-owned company, prepares
specification of projects for which seismic-related services are required. All
potential bidders that meet certain technical, legal and other requirements
submit bids which must include seismic data acquisition, processing and
interpretation services. Geoevaluaciones and PIASA submit a single bid for
their combined services. PEMEX places no restrictions on the participation of
foreign-owned companies in the bidding process. Geoevaluaciones' contracts with
PEMEX contain price terms which are fixed at the time the contracts are signed
and in the past have been denominated in pesos. These contracts contain cost
adjustment provisions which are triggered upon the occurrence of certain
economic events such as a devaluation of the peso, a change in the rate of
inflation or an increase in the statutory minimum wage rate. The adjustments
may be requested by Geoevaluaciones, but only with respect to the direct costs
incurred by Geoevaluaciones under a contract that are affected by the economic
event. While these adjustment features protect Geoevaluaciones against partial
declines in its peso-denominated profit margin, they do not protect
Geoevaluaciones from a decline in the dollar value of its profits or net
assets.
The Company's contracts specify that the seismic data acquired by the
Company belongs to the Company's customer. All of the customer's information is
maintained in confidence.
Customers. The Company's customers include and have included a number
of major oil companies and their affiliates, including PEMEX, ARCO, BP Alaska
and Marathon, as well as many smaller, independent oil and gas
8
<PAGE> 9
companies. The table below sets forth customers that accounted for more than 10%
of the Company's revenues in 1995 and 1996. This information gives effect to the
acquisitions of Northern, Paragon and Kemp as if those acquisitions had occurred
on January 1, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ending December 31,
1995 1996
---- ----
(in millions of dollars)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
PEMEX $9.8 26.0% $11.9 21.5%
Duncan Oil, Inc. $4.3 11.4% $ 0.6 1.1%
BP Alaska -- -- $ 8.8 15.8%
Seitel, Inc. $2.8 7.4% $ 7.3 13.1%
(Percentages represent the percentage of total pro forma revenue)
</TABLE>
No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's
pro forma net revenues in those periods. The loss of PEMEX as a customer would
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, cash flows
and results of operations.
A large portion of the Company's net revenues in any period may be
attributable to a limited number of customers, even though the mix of customers
changes over time as contracts are awarded and completed. The Company has a
number of customers for which, over the years, services have been repeatedly
provided.
Safety and Environmental Program. Certain of the Company's customers,
including PEMEX and other large oil and gas companies, require, as a condition
of awarding contracts, that a safety program designed to reduce the hazards
associated with acquiring seismic data be in place. The Company employs a
full-time safety officer who is in charge of implementing a Company-wide
health, safety and environmental program intended to comply with the
requirements of major oil and gas companies and applicable regulatory
authorities.
Backlog. At February 28, 1997 the Company's backlog of data
acquisition surveys was approximately $59.6 million. Approximately 65% of the
backlog was attributable to the Company's operations in the United States,
approximately 25% of such backlog related to operations in Mexico and Peru (the
"Latin American Operations"), and approximately 10% related to the operations
in Canada. The majority of such backlog consisted of written orders or
commitments; however, contracts for services are occasionally varied or
modified by mutual consent and, in many instances, are subject to cancellation
by the customer on short notice without penalty. Consequently, the Company's
backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of the Company's actual
operating results for any succeeding fiscal period. Subject to the foregoing,
the Company anticipates that approximately 85% of the orders and commitments
included in backlog will be completed prior to the end of 1997 and it is
expected that the balance will be completed in 1998.
COMPETITION
The Company has extensive competition in each of the regions in which
it operates. Contracts for seismic data acquisition services generally are
awarded on the basis of price, crew experience, equipment availability,
technological expertise and reputation for dependability and safety.
Competition is particularly intense for providers of more technologically
advanced seismic data. Certain of the Company's major competitors have more
crews and provide data acquisition, processing and interpretation services,
have far greater financial and other resources than the Company and have more
extensive relationships with major integrated and multinational oil and gas
companies. These resources enable these competitors to maintain
state-of-the-art technology and certain other advantages relating to costs that
may provide them with an advantage over the Company in bidding for contracts.
In addition, certain competitors of the Company take an economic interest in
oil and gas exploration and development projects for which they perform
services for their customers. There can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to compete successfully against its competitors for contracts to
conduct seismic surveys.
9
<PAGE> 10
EMPLOYEES
As of February 28, 1997 the Company employed approximately 1,041
people, of whom 23 performed management and marketing functions, 71 performed
administrative services or clerical functions, 85 were geophysicists or
rendered engineering or other technical services and approximately 862 were
members of the Company's seismic crews or performed other functions. None of
the Company's employees is represented by a labor union or is a direct or
indirect party to a collective bargaining agreement. The Company believes it
has good relations with its employees.
REGULATION
Seismic data acquisition operations are subject to various laws and
regulations in the United States, Mexico, Peru and Canada, as well as other
countries in which the Company may operate in the future. Such laws and
regulations govern various aspects of operations, including the discharge of
explosive materials into the environment, requiring removal and cleanup of
materials that may harm the environment or otherwise relating to the protection
of the environment, access to private and governmental land to conduct seismic
surveys and use of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors. The
Company believes that it has conducted its operations in substantial compliance
with applicable environmental laws and regulations governing its activities.
ACQUISITION OF J.R.S. EXPLORATION
On January 27, 1997, the Company completed the purchase of J.R.S.
Exploration, a land-based seismic data acquisition business headquartered in
Calgary, Alberta, Canada. J.R.S. Exploration has been operating in Western
Canada since 1978 with up to four seismic crews utilizing 24-bit seismic
recording systems manufactured by Sercel Incorporated that have a total of
approximately 2,000 channels. Imperial Oil Resources Limited and Shell Canada
accounted in the aggregate for over 63% of J.R.S. Exploration's revenues in its
fiscal year ended November 30, 1996. J.R.S. Exploration is currently a party to
seismic data acquisition services contracts with these two customers which
expire on June 30, 1997 and September 30, 1998, respectively. For its fiscal
year ended November 30, 1996, J.R.S. Exploration had revenues of approximately
C$12.5 million (U.S.$9.1 million) and earnings before interest, taxes and
depreciation of approximately C$2.6 million (U.S.$1.9 million). As of February
28, 1997, the exchange rate was approximately $.73 per Canadian dollar.
The Company will seek to expand J.R.S. Exploration's business during
winter, the peak Canadian operating season, by shifting certain of the
Company's equipment to Canada during the period from January through April, and
the Company believes that it will be able to utilize J.R.S. Exploration's
equipment in the United States (including Alaska) during the other months of
the year.
Under the terms of the acquisition, the Company acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the intermediate holding
companies that own all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of J.R.S.
Exploration for C$3.5 million (U.S.$2.6 million) in cash and 279,166 shares of
Common Stock. In addition the Company repaid approximately C$1.8 million
(U.S.$1.3 million) of debt J.R.S. Exploration owed to a commercial bank. Also
under the terms of the acquisition, Messrs. Donald Janveau and W. Garnet
Mueller, the principal stockholders and executive officers of J.R.S.
Exploration, entered into three-year employment agreements (the "Employment
Agreements") with J.R.S. Exploration pursuant to which Mr. Janveau serves as
President and Chief Executive Officer of J.R.S. Exploration and Mr. Mueller
serves as Vice President of Operations of J.R.S. Exploration. The Employment
Agreements each provide for an annual salary of C$150,000 (U.S.$110,000). In
connection with the Employment Agreements, Messrs. Janveau and Mueller each
entered into a five-year covenant not to compete with the Company or any of its
subsidiaries in the provision of seismic data acquisition or analysis services
or any services related thereto. In connection with the acquisition of J.R.S.
Exploration, the Company also acquired all of the issued and outstanding
capital stock of Siegfried & Siegfried Ltd., an Alberta corporation that was
wholly-owned by Mr. C. David Siegfried, an employee of J.R.S. Exploration and
owns certain seismic data acquisition equipment presently being leased to
J.R.S. Exploration. The purchase price for Siegfried & Siegfried Ltd. was
C$150,000 (U.S.$110,000) in cash and 12,500 shares of Common Stock. Under the
terms of this acquisition, Mr. Siegfried entered into a three-year employment
agreement with J.R.S. Exploration pursuant to which Mr. Siegfried serves as
Sales Manager and Operations Supervisor of J.R.S. Exploration. This employment
agreement provides for an annual salary of C$100,000 (U.S.$73,000). In
connection
10
<PAGE> 11
with this employment agreement, Mr. Siegfried entered into a
three-year covenant not to compete with the Company or any of its subsidiaries
in the provision of seismic data acquisition or analysis services or any
services related thereto.
The Company used a portion of the proceeds from its December 1996
public offering of Common Stock to pay the cash portion of the purchase price
for J.R.S. Exploration and Siegfried & Siegfried Ltd. and to repay the debt of
J.R.S. Exploration described above.
Item 2. Properties
The principal facilities of the Registrant are summarized in the table below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Building
Owned Area Annual
or Approximate Lease
Location Leased Purpose Square Feet Payments
- - --------------------------- ---------- --------------------------- ------------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Englewood, Colorado Leased Corporate headquarters 8,000 $73,075
Anchorage, Alaska Leased Field crew office 5,000 $41,004
Houston, Texas Leased Field crew office 2,000 $19,311
Grand Junction, Colorado Leased Repair shop and storage 11,000 $36,000
facility
Katy, Texas Leased Repair shop and storage 4,000 $15,000
facility
Mt. Gilead, Ohio Owned Field crew office 10,000 N/A
Millersburg, Ohio Leased Repair shop 4,000 $7,200
Millersburg, Ohio Owned Field crew office 3,000 N/A
Liberal, Kansas Leased Field crew office 4,000 $10,800
Mexico City, D.F., Mexico Leased Company headquarters of
Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de 10,000 $86,842
C.V.
Reynosa, Mexico Leased Data processing center 43,000 $18,000
and office facilities
Poza Rica, Mexico Leased Field crew office and 38,000 $40,263
repair shop
Lima, Peru Leased Peru branch office 5,000 $50,400
headquarters
Iquitos, Peru Leased Field crew office 5,000 $7,200
New York, New York Leased Office of the Chairman of 4,000 $165,159
the Board
</TABLE>
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in or party to a number of lawsuits arising
in the ordinary course of its business, which lawsuits the Company believes
have little substantive merit. While the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be
predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any of these
lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or
financial position.
Geoevaluaciones has a dispute, and may be threatened with litigation,
in connection with certain agreements it entered into with Capilano
International Inc., a Canadian company ("Capilano"). The dispute concerns a
Letter of Intent and a Technical Assistance Agreement, dated June 3, 1991 and
June 1, 1992, respectively (the "Capilano Agreements"). Capilano stated in its
1994 Annual Report to Shareholders that is has had difficulty in collecting
amounts owing from a Mexican company (presumably, Geoevaluaciones) to which
Capilano supplied technical assistance and stated in its 1995 Annual Report
that it had written down by approximately C$1.9 million accounts receivable in
Mexico.
11
<PAGE> 12
Geoevaluaciones maintains that it is not obligated to compensate Capilano for
certain services Geoevaluaciones believes were either inadequately provided or
not provided at all by Capilano and has other valid defenses to any claim
Capilano may assert. Representatives of Capilano and Geoevaluaciones have had
ongoing discussions since May 1996 in an effort to resolve this dispute. The
Company currently is not able to estimate the effect, if any, on its results of
operation and financial position which may result from the resolution of this
matter. Therefore, the financial statements of the Company do not reflect any
adjustments related to this matter. A portion of the amounts payable to the
former stockholders of Geoevaluaciones in connection with the acquisition by
3-D Geophysical of the stock of Geoevaluaciones owned by such stockholders is
held in escrow and available to pay amounts in settlement or otherwise in
connection with the dispute with Capilano.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
12
<PAGE> 13
PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Since the initial public offering in February 1996 of Common Stock at $7.50 per
share, the Common Stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "TDGO". The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sale prices per share for the Common Stock as reported by the
Nasdaq National Market:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
High Low
---- ---
<S> <C> <C>
1996
First Quarter (February 8 through March 31) 10 3/8 7 7/16
Second Quarter 12 1/2 8 1/2
Third Quarter 11 3/4 6 3/4
Fourth Quarter 10 7 1/2
1997
First Quarter (through March 25, 1997) 10 1/2 5 3/8
</TABLE>
On March 25, 1997, the last reported sale price of the Common Stock as reported
by the Nasdaq National Market was $6 1/16.
3-D Geophysical's Certificate of Incorporation provides for authorized
capital stock of 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share,
of which 11,625,000 shares were outstanding at March 25, 1997, and 1,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share ("Preferred Stock"), of
which no shares were outstanding at March 25, 1997
As of February 28, 1997, there were 90 holders of record of Common
Stock.
The loan agreement with First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A. (See
"Liquidity and Capital Resources") restricts the payment of dividends and the
redemption of capital stock. As such, it is not management's intentions to
declare or pay dividends in the near future.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data (in thousands)
The following table of selected financial data includes the operating
results of the Predecessor Company's Operations for all of the periods and the
operating results of Northern, Kemp and Paragon only for the period beginning
February 9, 1996. Therefore, the information as set out below is comparable for
the four years ended December 31, 1995 but the year ended December 31, 1996 is
not comparable to prior periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the For the For the For the For the
Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues $10,342 $17,638 $17,660 $ 9,825 $51,754
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Income before extraordinary item $ 215 $ 1,075 $ 1,904 $ 1,607 $ 829
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Income before extraordinary item,
per share $ 0.11
=======
Total assets $ 7,533 $ 6,448 $ 4,547 $77,266
======= ======= ======= =======
Long-term debt $ 305 $ 309 -- $ 4,597
======= ======= ======= =======
Cash dividends declared per share --
=======
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE> 14
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation
The following discussion has been divided into two sections. The first section
contains the consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
indicated. For accounting purposes, the operations of Geoevaluaciones and
PIASA, and 3-D Geophysical of Latin America, Inc. (the "Latin American
Operations") are considered the predecessor company, and the combined financial
statements include the operating results of the Latin American Operations for
all of the periods and the operating results of Northern, Paragon and Kemp (the
"Purchased Companies") only for the period beginning February 9, 1996. As a
result, the Company's results of operations and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1996 are not comparable to the Company's results of operations and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995. The second section contains a
discussion of the liquidity and capital resources of the Company, the impact of
the Mexican economy and certain other matters. The following discussion of the
results of operations and the financial position of 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
of the Operating Subsidiaries and PIASA should be read in connection with the
financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 1996 compared to Year Ended December 31, 1995
NET REVENUES. Net sales for the Company increased 426.8% to $51.8
million in the year ended December 31, 1996 from $9.8 million in the year ended
December 31, 1995. The increase is primarily attributable to the inclusion of
$39.4 million of net revenues of the Company's operations in the United States
and a 26.0% increase to $12.4 million in the year ended December 31, 1996 from
$9.8 million in the year ended December 31, 1995 for the Latin American
Operations. Net revenues in the year ended December 31, 1995 include $2.6
million of contractual adjustments related to increased costs due to the
devaluation of the Mexican peso which occurred in December of 1994. Net
revenues in the year ended December 31, 1996 include similar contractual
adjustments of $1.0 million.
COST OF DATA ACQUISITION. Cost of data acquisition for the Company
increased 570.8% to $40.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1996 from $6.0
million in the year ended December 31, 1995. The increase is primarily
attributable to the inclusion of $28.9 million of cost of data acquisition of
the Company's operations in the United States and an 84.4% increase to $11.0
million in the year ended December 31, 1996, from $6.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 1995, for the Latin American Operations. The decrease in
gross margin for the Latin American Operations for the year ended December 31,
1996 compared to the year ended December 31, 1995 is primarily due to cost
overruns on Geoevaluaciones's first 3-D seismic survey. The decrease in gross
margins for the Latin American Operations is further attributable to larger
price adjustments realized during the year ended December 31, 1995 and the
impact in the year ended December 31, 1996 of the Southern Services crew (a
drilling and field services crew operating in Southern Mexico) which did not
commence work in 1995 until November. Further contributing to the decline in
gross margins in the Latin American Operations was the notification to the
Company by ARCO of its intention to delay indefinitely the seismic survey which
was under contract with the Company in Peru. Based on this notification, the
Company recorded a $740,000 charge in the fourth quarter, including a $100,000
reserve against future losses attributable to this contract.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization for the
Company increased 520.2% to $4.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1996
from $662,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995. The increase is primarily
attributable to the inclusion of $3.0 million of depreciation and amortization
of the Company's operations in the United States, including $362,000 of
goodwill amortization attributable to the acquisitions of Northern and Kemp.
This is in addition to a 57.9% increase to $1.0 million in the year ended
December 31, 1996, from $662,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995, for the
Latin American Operations.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative
expenses for the Company increased 478.2% to $6.0 million in the year ended
December 31, 1996 from $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1995. The
increase is primarily attributable to the inclusion of $4.6 million of general
and administrative expenses from the Company's operations in the United States,
and a 35.2 % increase to $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 1996, from
$1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1995, for the Latin American
Operations. General and administrative
14
<PAGE> 15
expenses for the Company have increased due to the added costs associated with
being a publicly traded company and increased marketing costs.
OPERATING INCOME. Operating income for the Company decreased 25.2% to
$1.6 million in the year ended December 31, 1996 from $2.2 million in the year
ended December 31, 1995. The operating income of the Latin American Operations
decreased 149.7% in the year ended December 31, 1996 to an operating loss of
$1.1 million from $2.2 million of operating income in the year ended December
31, 1995. The decrease in operating income for the Latin American Operations in
the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to the year ended December 31, 1995
is primarily due to cost overruns on Geoevaluaciones's first 3-D seismic
survey. The decrease in operating income is also due to contractual revenue
adjustments of $2.6 million, which were realized during the year ending
December 31, 1995, attributable to increased costs resulting from the
devaluation of the Mexican peso during December of 1994. This is contrasted
with contractual revenue adjustments of $1.0 million realized during the year
ended December 31, 1996. Further contributing to the decline in gross margins
in the Latin American Operations was the notification to the Company by ARCO of
its intention to indefinitely delay the seismic survey which was under contract
with the Company in Peru. Based on notification of this information, the
Company has recorded a $740,000 fourth quarter charge in its Latin American
Operations. This charge includes the recognition of a $100,000 reserve against
future losses attributable to this contract. The decrease in operating income
of the Latin American Operations was partially offset by the inclusion of $2.6
million of operating income of the Company's operations in the United States
for the year ended December 31, 1996.
INTEREST INCOME. The Company's interest income increased 74.0% to
$461,000 in the year ended December 31, 1996 from $265,000 in the year ended
December 31, 1995. The increase is primarily the result of interest income in
Mexico due to higher interest rates available in Mexico, interest income from
the investment of the proceeds of the Company's initial public offering and
interest income from the conversion of a trade receivable to an
interest-bearing note receivable.
INTEREST EXPENSE. The Company's interest expense increased 27.1% to
$1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1996 from $803,000 in the year
ended December 31, 1995. The increase is due to interest charges on borrowings
of approximately $12.0 million under a credit facility with the Company's
principal lender during the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to borrowings
of approximately $300,000 during the year ended December 31, 1995.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTION LOSSES. The Company recognized a foreign
currency loss of $91,000 in the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to a
foreign currency loss of $120,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995. These
losses are primarily due to unfavorable fluctuations in the Peso/U.S. dollar
exchange rate as such fluctuations increased the peso value of U.S. dollar
liabilities for the Latin American Operations.
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME. The Company recognized miscellaneous income of
$336,000 in the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to miscellaneous income
of $238,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995. The increase is due to rental
income on equipment coupled with a value-added tax refund, partially offset by
a decrease in gains on equipment disposition.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE. The Company recognized income tax expense from
operations of $470,000 in the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to income
tax expense of $130,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995. The effective
income tax rate for the Company for the year ended December 31, 1996 is 36%.
This rate is increased over the effective rate for the year ended December 31,
1995, of 7% primarily due to the recognition of a full valuation allowance on
the tax benefit relating to the fourth quarter charge of $740,000 which was
recognized in the Company's Latin American Operations. The increase is also due
to the Company's United States Operations being taxed at a 25% effective tax
rate, which is substantially higher than the rate recognized in the Company's
1995 results. The effective tax rate for the Company's operations in the United
States is lower than the statutory tax rate of 34% due to a change in the
valuation allowance previously established with respect to net operating loss
carryforwards.
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM NET OF INCOME TAX EXPENSE. The Company recognized a
$57,000 extraordinary item in the year ended December 31, 1996, net of tax
expense of $36,000. The extraordinary item is due to a gain recognized on the
early extinguishment of debt. No extraordinary items were recognized in the
year ended December 31, 1995.
15
<PAGE> 16
Year Ended December 31, 1995 compared to Year Ended December 31, 1994
NET REVENUES. Net revenues decreased 44.4% to $9.8 million in the year
ended December 31, 1995 from $17.7 million in the year ended December 31, 1994.
The decline in net revenues was attributed primarily to the devaluation of the
peso as well as the decline in demand for seismic surveys by PEMEX in 1995 due
to the economic turmoil in Mexico in 1995 as well as PEMEX's internal
transition from 2-D to 3-D as its primary seismic survey technique.
COST OF DATA ACQUISITION. Cost of data acquisition decreased 45.8% to
$6.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1995 from $11.0 million in the year
ended December 31, 1994. The decline in cost of data acquisition in the Mexican
Operations is attributable primarily to the devaluation of the peso and to a
lesser extent decreases in personnel due the decline in demand for seismic
surveys by PEMEX in 1995.
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION. Depreciation and amortization decreased
54.9% to $662,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995 from $1.5 million in the
year ended December 31, 1994. The decline in depreciation and amortization in
the Mexican Operations is attributable primarily to the devaluation of the
peso, and to lesser extent, decreases in capital expenditures.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative
expenses decreased 42.8% to $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 1995
from $1.8 million in the year ended December 31, 1994. The decline in general
and administrative expenses in the Mexican Operations is attributable primarily
to the devaluation of the peso and to lesser extent decreases in personnel due
to the decline in demand for seismic surveys by PEMEX in 1995.
OPERATING INCOME. Operating income decreased 36.1% to $2.2 million in
the year ended December 31, 1995 from $3.4 million in the year ended December
31, 1994. The decline in operating income in the Mexican Operations is
attributable primarily to the devaluation of the peso as well as the decline in
demand for seismic surveys by PEMEX in 1995 due to the economic turmoil in
Mexico in 1995 as well as PEMEX's internal transition from 2-D to 3-D as its
primary seismic survey technique.
INTEREST INCOME. Interest income increased 60.6% to $265,000 in the
year ended December 31, 1995 from $165,000 in the year ended December 31, 1994
as a result of higher interest rates in Mexico in 1995.
INTEREST EXPENSE. Interest expense increased 72.3 % to $803,000 in the
year ended December 31, 1995 from $466,000 in the year ended December 31, 1994.
The increase in interest expense is attributable to higher borrowing costs in
1995 due to the economic impact of the devaluation of the peso and financing
charges in connection with the factoring of receivables arising out of the
Mexican Operations in the year ended December 31, 1995.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTION GAINS (LOSSES). Foreign currency losses
of $120,000 were recognized in the year ended December 31, 1995 compared to
foreign currency losses of $92,000 in the year ended December 31,1994. These
losses are primarily due to unfavorable fluctuations in the Peso/U.S. dollar
exchange rate as such fluctuations increased the peso value of U.S. dollar
liabilities for the Mexican Operations.
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME (EXPENSE). Miscellaneous income of $238,000 was
recognized in the year ended December 31, 1995 compared to miscellaneous
expense of $77,000 in the year ended December 31, 1994. The increase is
primarily the result of a gain on the sale of equipment.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT). Income tax expense was $130,000 in the
year ended December 31, 1995 compared to income tax expense of $1.0 million in
the year ended December 31, 1994. The decline is attributable to lower earnings
and inflation adjustments to the 35% tax rate in Mexico which reduced the
Company's effective tax rate to 7.5%.
16
<PAGE> 17
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
From December 31, 1995 to December 31, 1996, total assets of the
Company increased from $4.5 million to $77.3 million, total liabilities
increased from $2.7 million to $29.1 million and total stockholders' equity
increased from $1.8 million to $48.2 million. These increases resulted from the
Company's public offerings, the acquisition of the Operating Subsidiaries and
new capital expenditures partially financed by the Term Loan (as defined
below).
On February 9, 1996, the Company completed its initial public offering
of 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price to the public of $7.50 per
share. Subsequently, on February 21, 1996, the underwriters exercised their
over-allotment option to purchase an additional 600,000 shares at a price to
the public of $7.50 per share, The net proceeds to the Company (after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses) were
approximately $28.5 million. Of this amount, approximately $3.5 million was
treated, for accounting purposes, as a dividend to the former stockholders of
Geoevaluaciones and PIASA, approximately $10.3 million was used to purchase the
land seismic assets of Northern and all of the capital stock of Kemp,
approximately $4.6 million was used to repay indebtedness of the Operating
Subsidiaries, $152,000 was used to retire capital leases and approximately $1.1
million was paid subsequent to the acquisitions as a purchase price adjustment
for the land-based seismic data operations of Northern. The remaining proceeds
were used primarily for working capital and capital expenditures.
On December 17, 1996, the Company completed a second public offering
of 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price to the public of $7.50 per
share. The net proceeds to the Company (after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and offering expenses) were approximately $23.5 million. On
January 7, 1997, the underwriters exercised their overallotment option and the
Company sold an additional 525,000 shares of Common Stock for net proceeds to
the Company of approximately $3.7 million. Of these amounts, $14.4 million has
been or will be used for capital expenditures, $4.1 million was used to fund
the cash portion of the purchase price for J.R.S. Exploration and to retire
certain existing debt obligations of J.R.S. Exploration, $3.0 million was used
to retire indebtedness incurred under a loan agreement (the "Loan Agreement,"
described below) with First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A. and the balance has
been and will be used for working capital.
At December 31, 1996, the Company had $17.6 million of unrestricted
cash. The Company's operating activities provided $3.8 million net cash in the
year ended December 31, 1996 compared with providing $1.7 million of cash in
the prior year. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was
primarily attributable to a net decrease in working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $33.2 million in
the year ended December 31, 1996 from net cash flow provided from investing
activities of $203,000 in the prior year. This increase was due to $10.3
million of cash utilized to purchase Northern and Kemp and for capital
expenditures of $22.3 million, offset by cash proceeds of approximately
$245,000 from the sale of equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased to $46.4 million
in the year ended December 31, 1996 from net cash utilized of $1.4 million in
the prior year due to the completion of the initial public offering, the
completion of the second public offering, and the closing of the Loan
Agreement.
The Company used $22.3 million for capital expenditures in the year
ended December 31, 1996 compared to $147,000 in the prior year. Simultaneously
with the acquisition of the Operating Subsidiaries, Northern and Paragon
exercised options to purchase equipment which had been rented. These capital
expenditures reduced the Company's reliance on rented equipment and improved
the Company's ability to meet the demand for 3-D data acquisition services. On
May 31, 1996, the Company purchased approximately $8.5 million of equipment
from Input/Output, Inc. This purchase increased the Company's recording channel
capacity from approximately 7,500 to approximately 12,000 channels.
Simultaneously with the purchase of the equipment, the Company entered
into an $18 million credit facility with First Interstate Bank of Texas, N. A.
The Loan Agreement is for three years and includes $7.5 million of financing
for the above equipment and $4.5 million of refinancing of conditional sales
agreements acquired by the Operating Subsidiaries prior to the Company's
initial public offering. The new equipment has been utilized to meet the
17
<PAGE> 18
requirements of a contract with BP Alaska, to increase the channel capacity of
one of the Company's Mexican crews for a 3-D contract with PEMEX and to
increase the channel capacity of the Company's two crews in the Rocky Mountain
region.
The Loan Agreement provides for a term loan of $15.0 million (the
"Term Loan"), of which $3.0 million is available for future capital
expenditures, and a revolving credit working capital facility (the "Revolving
Credit Loan") of up to $3.0 million, of which $800,000 was available as of
December 31, 1996. The Term Loan is payable in substantially equal monthly
installments through July 31, 1999, bears interest at an annual rate equal to
the prime rate plus 1% (9.25% at December 31, 1996) and is collateralized by a
lien on the Company's accounts, accounts receivable, equipment, machinery,
fixtures, inventory, goods, chattel paper, documents, instruments, investment
property, general intangibles, and other personal property, whether then owned
or thereafter acquired, and all products and proceeds thereof, and by
guarantees by certain of the Company's subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Loan
may be drawn down from time to time through May 29,1997 in an amount of up to
70% of the Company's "Eligible Accounts" (as defined in the Loan Agreement).
The rate of interest and the security for the Revolving Credit Loan are the
same as those described above for the Term Loan. In addition to certain
customary affirmative covenants, the Loan Agreement contains restrictions on
the Company with respect to (i) incurring Debt (as defined), incurring or
permitting to exist Liens (as defined ) on its property, assets or revenues,
(ii) declaring or paying any dividends or other distributions on its capital
stock (or acquiring any of its capital stock), (iii) issuing capital stock,
(iv) entering into transactions with affiliates, (v) disposing of assets, and
(vi) certain other matters. The Loan Agreement also contains financial
covenants with respect to minimum tangible net worth, the ratio of tangible net
worth to net liabilities and the ratio of earnings to debt service.
On October 1, 1996, the Company entered into a termination agreement
with the Company's former Chief Financial Officer pursuant to which the Company
agreed to pay him $200,000 in January 1997 plus $5,000 per month through
December 31, 1998, to provide him with office space and secretarial support in
the Company's New York City facility through December 31, 1997 and to provide
him with certain insurance benefits through December 31,1998. See Item 13 -
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions".
At February 28, 1997, the Company's estimated backlog of commitments
for services totaled approximately $59.6 million. The Company expects to
complete approximately 85% of these commitments during 1997 and the balance
during 1998; however, commitments are subject to cancellation at the option of
the Company's customers on short notice and without penalty. Consequently, the
Company's backlog as of any particular date may not be indicative of the
Company's actual operating results for any succeeding fiscal period.
The Company believes that its planned capital expenditures and
operating requirements for the next 12 months will be funded from a portion of
the net proceeds from the Company's second public offering, cash from
operations and, to the extent available, borrowings under the Loan Agreement.
The Company may revise its plans in response to future changes in the oil and
gas industry in general and the demand for its services in particular, its
results of operations, its other capital requirements and other relevant
factors. 3-D Geophysical periodically evaluates opportunities to acquire
businesses and assets; however, the Company does not have any current
understanding, arrangement or agreement to acquire any such businesses or
assets. The Company believes that long-term capital requirements will be met in
that, in addition to cash from operations and borrowing under the Loan
Agreement, it may fund any such acquisitions through the issuance of additional
debt or equity securities. The issuance of additional equity securities,
including shares of Common Stock issued in connection with any acquisitions,
would result in dilution to holders of Common Stock. The Company believes that
significant changes in the economic environment, such as interest rates, could
effect the Company, including such matters as its ability to finance its
capital expenditures.
18
<PAGE> 19
IMPACT OF MEXICAN ECONOMY
For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 pro forma net revenues
from the Mexican Operations were 26.0% and 21.45%, respectively, of pro forma
net revenues of the Company. The Company's financial performance is, and will
continue to be, affected by economic conditions in Mexico.
The level of land-based seismic data acquisition services in Mexico
has in the past been vulnerable to economic downturns and changes in government
policies and public spending. Since December 1994, Mexico has experienced an
economic crisis characterized by a significant devaluation of the peso,
exchange rate instability, increased inflation, high domestic interest rates,
negative economic growth, reduced consumer purchasing power and high
unemployment. Inflation in Mexico for years ended December 31, 1994, 1995, and
1996 was approximately 7.1%, 52.0%, and 27.7%, respectively, based on the
consumer price index.
The December 1994 devaluation of the peso has had a number of effects
on the Mexican economy that have adversely affected the financial condition of
Mexican companies, including Geoevaluaciones. The devaluation caused the peso
value of Geoevaluaciones' dollar denominated indebtedness, which consists
primarily of equipment financing, to increase significantly, and also greatly
increased the rate of inflation, resulting in a sharp rise in nominal interest
rates on peso denominated financing.
The prices Geoevaluaciones pays for certain equipment, energy and
other materials are set, in part, by reference to international prices
denominated in currencies other than pesos. Pursuant to Geoevaluaciones'
contracts with PEMEX, certain of the costs incurred by Geoevaluaciones may be
adjusted to take into account economic events such as inflation and devaluation
of the peso. Geoevaluaciones' results of operations, denominated in pesos, are
translated into U.S. dollars for inclusion in the Company's financial
statements. However, increases in the peso to dollar exchange rate will result
in a reduction of the dollar value of peso-based revenues of the Company as
well as the dollar value of peso-based expenses of the Company. Likewise,
decreases in such rate will result in increases in the dollar value of such
revenues and expenses. As a result, such fluctuations could have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. The table below sets forth the peso to dollar exchange rate during the
periods indicated (based on the average of the closing rates published by Banco
Mexicano de Comercio Exterior for each business day during such period) and the
closing rate for the last day of each such period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Peso to Dollar Exchange Rate
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
1994 1995 1996
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Average ........................ 3.48 6.42 7.60
Period end ..................... 5.00 7.68 7.88
</TABLE>
While the Company may from time to time evaluate methods to reduce
foreign exchange risks, the adoption of any particular method will depend on
existing market conditions. The Company cannot reasonably predict what method,
if any, it will adopt to reduce foreign exchange risks, and there can be no
assurance that it will adopt any such method or that, if adopted, any such
method will reduce such risks.
The financial statements of Geoevaluaciones for the two years ended
December 31, 1995 and the results of Geoevaluaciones for the year ended
December 31, 1996, which are included in the Company's consolidated financial
statements, have been prepared using the peso as the functional currency as
prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 ("Statement
52"). Statement 52 requires that an entity's reporting currency, should be used
as the functional currency if inflation in the primary economic environment
exceeds 100% over a three-year period. If the financial statements of
Geoevaluaciones had been prepared using the dollar as the functional currency
for the three years ended December 31, 1996, net income would have been lower.
The inflation rate in Mexico, as measured by the consumer price index,
has exceeded 100% for the three years ended December 31, 1996. Accordingly, the
Company will adopt the dollar as the functional currency for the Mexican
Operations beginning January 1, 1997 in accordance with Statement 52. Using the
dollar as the functional currency will
19
<PAGE> 20
result in adjustments to the consolidated statement of operations in future
periods for foreign currency translation gains and losses. In 1996, these
amounts were included as amounts in cumulative foreign currency translation
adjustments, reflected in stockholders' equity, and were not charged to
earnings.
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
Provisions for income taxes are based on pretax income reported for
financial statement purposes. Such provisions differ from amounts currently
payable because certain items of income and expenses are recognized for income
tax purposes in periods different form the periods for financial statement
purposes. The tax effects of these timing differences, primarily with respect
to depreciation and amortization, are reflected as deferred income taxes. The
Company's income from the Mexican Operations will be subject to the statutory
tax rate in Mexico of 34%, net of applicable inflation adjustments. Any Mexican
income tax paid will be available as a credit against the Company's United
States federal income taxes upon the repatriation of any Mexican earnings to
the United states pursuant to tax treaties between Mexico and the United
States.
IMPACT OF PRICING, INFLATION AND SEASONALITY
The general availability of seismic data equipment and crews, and the
level of exploration activity in the oil and gas industry, directly affect the
cost of acquiring seismic data. The pricing of the Company's seismic data
acquisition services is primarily a function of these factors. The Company
believes that inflationary trends had no material impact on the results of its
operations in the United States during the years ended December 31, 1995 or
1996. The Mexican Operations in these periods were affected by the inflationary
pressure on the Mexican economy insofar as the peso was devalued, the cost of
peso-denominated financing rose sharply and the Mexican government sought to
curb public spending. Inflation in Mexico for the years ended December 31,
1994, 1995, and 1996 was approximately 7.1%, 52.0%, and 27.7% respectively,
based on the consumer price index. As a result, net revenues decreased once
revenues from Mexican Operations were translated from pesos to dollars.
The Company's seismic data acquisition operations historically have
been subject to seasonal fluctuation, with the greatest volume of data
acquisition occurring during the summer and fall. The consolidation of the
Operating Subsidiaries and the expansion into Alaska, Latin America and Canada
may enable the Company to deploy its crews and utilize its equipment in
disparate regions. The Company will attempt to conduct operations year round
with fewer days of down-time caused by inclement weather by working during the
favorable operating seasons in different regions. The Company believes that the
geographical diversification of its operations may reduce the impact of
seasonal fluctuations.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In February 1997, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" was issued. This statement, which is required to be
adopted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, establishes standards for
computing and presenting earnings per share ("EPS") and applies to entities
with publicly held common stock. This Statement simplifies the standards for
computing earnings per share under existing accounting principles and makes it
more comparable to international accounting standards. This Statement requires
restatement of all prior-period EPS data presented, however, management has
determined that the adoption of this standard will not have a significant
impact on the financial statements.
20
<PAGE> 21
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
3-D Geophysical, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 3-D
Geophysical Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and
1996 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Denver, Colorado
March 5, 1997, except as to the information presented in the last paragraph of
Note 10, for which the date is March 20, 1997.
21
<PAGE> 22
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1995 1996
-------- --------
(Predecessor) (Successor)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 609 $ 17,624
Restricted cash -- 820
Accounts receivable billed, net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts of $0 and $83, respectively 1,786 11,268
Accounts receivable, unbilled -- 2,933
Other receivables 158 282
Deferred income taxes -- 108
Prepaid expenses and other 239 999
-------- --------
Total current assets 2,792 34,034
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,744 and $5,525, respectively 1,746 35,529
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $0 and $362,
respectively -- 6,115
Other assets 9 1,588
-------- --------
Total assets $ 4,547 $ 77,266
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases $ 182 $ 7,559
Accounts payable 1,004 12,912
Accrued liabilities 1,003 1,560
Deferred revenue -- 1,536
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 2,189 23,567
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of current maturities -- 4,597
Deferred income taxes 530 937
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock-predecessor 321 --
Common stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized,
11,100,000 shares issued and outstanding -- 111
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued and outstanding -- --
Additional paid in capital -- 51,426
Retained earnings 4,363 739
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment (2,856) (4,111)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 1,828 48,165
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 4,547 $ 77,266
======== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
22
<PAGE> 23
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year For the Year For the Year
Ended Ended Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1994 1995 1996
-------- -------- --------
(Predecessor) (Predecessor) (Successor)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales $ 17,660 $ 9,825 $ 51,754
Expenses
Cost of data acquisition 11,004 5,968 40,032
Depreciation and amortization 1,468 662 4,106
General and administrative expenses 1,814 1,038 6,002
-------- -------- --------
14,286 7,668 50,140
-------- -------- --------
Operating income 3,374 2,157 1,614
Other income (expense):
Interest income 165 265 461
Interest expense (466) (803) (1,021)
Foreign currency transaction
losses (92) (120) (91)
Miscellaneous (77) 238 336
-------- -------- --------
(470) (420) (315)
-------- -------- --------
Income before provision for income taxes
and extraordinary item 2,904 1,737 1,299
Provision for income taxes 1,000 130 470
-------- -------- --------
Income before extraordinary item 1,904 1,607 829
Extraordinary item, net of tax expense of
$36 -- -- 57
-------- -------- --------
Net income $ 1,904 $ 1,607 $ 886
======== ======== ========
Income per share before extraordinary item
$ 0.11
Extraordinary item per share, net of
tax expense 0.01
--------
Net earnings per share $ 0.12
========
Weighted average common shares outstanding 7,224
========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
23
<PAGE> 24
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year For the Year For the Year
Ended Ended Ended
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1994 1995 1996
------------ ------------ -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: (Predecessor) (Predecessor) (Successor)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income $ 1,904 $ 1,607 $ 886
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,468 662 4,106
Gain on sale of fixed assets - (350) (192)
Extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt (93)
Foreign currency transaction losses 91
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of investing and
financing activities:
Effect of change in exchange rate on operating assets and liabilities (61) 197 1
(Increase) decrease in receivables, net of the allowance for doubtful accounts 369 504 (5,834)
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets - - (551)
(Increase) in deferred income tax assets - - (21)
(Increase) decrease in other assets (56) 66 (1,294)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 356 (1,156) 5,733
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities (542) 13 (576)
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue - - 1,536
Increase (decrease) in deferred income tax liability 963 130 (6)
------------ ------------ ------------
Total adjustments 2,497 66 2,900
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,401 1,673 3,786
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment (3,264) (147) (22,264)
Cash consideration paid to acquire Operating
Subsidiaries, net of cash acquired - - (10,328)
Cash received from sale of property and equipment - 350 245
Cash paid into restricted cash account - - (820)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities (3,264) 203 (33,167)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from public offerings, net of underwriting discounts - - 56,760
Cash paid in connection with the public offerings - - (4,768)
Issuance of predecessor common stock - 28 -
Cash paid to retire indebtedness of the Operating Subsidiaries - - (4,599)
Principal payments on notes payable and capital leases (743) (542) (13,709)
Cash paid for debt financing costs - - (167)
Cash proceeds from borrowings under notes payable and capital leases - - 15,051
Cash dividend paid to owners of predecessor company - (702) (3,510)
Net borrowings under factor agreements (1,315) (207) -
Cash received from overdraft balance - - 1,348
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities (2,058) (1,423) 46,406
Net increase (decrease) in cash (921) 453 17,025
Cash at beginning of period 1,858 242 609
Effect of change in exchange rate on cash (695) (86) (10)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash at end of period $ 242 $ 609 $ 17,624
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
24
<PAGE> 25
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Cumulative
Foreign
Additional Currency
Common Paid-In Retained Translation
Shares Stock Capital Earnings Adjustments Total
------ ----- ------- -------- ----------- -----
Predecessor:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 1,401 292 -- 1,555 (41) 1,806
Foreign currency translation adjustment -- -- -- -- (2,076) (2,076)
Net income for the year -- -- -- 1,903 -- 1,903
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predecessor:
Balance, December 31, 1994 1,401 292 -- 3,458 (2,117) 1,633
Foreign currency translation adjustment -- -- -- -- (739) (739)
Net income for the year -- -- -- 1,607 -- 1,607
Capital contribution -- 29 -- -- -- 29
Dividend paid to shareholders -- -- -- (702) -- (702)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predecessor:
Balance, December 31, 1995 1,401 321 -- 4,363 (2,856) 1,828
Successor:
Foreign currency translation adjustments -- -- -- -- (1,255) (1,255)
Recapitalization of predecessor company 246 (304) 304 -- -- --
Acquisition of Paragon 1,314 13 (1,083) -- -- (1,070)
Acquisition of Kemp 39 -- 294 -- -- 294
Public offerings of stock, net of under-
writing discount and offering costs 8,100 81 51,911 -- -- 51,992
Dividend to predecessor company
shareholders -- -- -- (4,510) -- (4,510)
Net income for the year -- -- -- 886 -- 886
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, 1996 11,100 111 51,426 739 (4,111) 48,165
===========================================================================
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
25
<PAGE> 26
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company is engaged in land-based and shallow water three-dimensional and
two-dimensional seismic data acquisition services to the oil and gas industry
in the Western Hemisphere.
On February 9, 1996, 3-D Geophysical, Inc. (the "Company") consummated an
initial public offering (the "Initial Public Offering") and simultaneously
acquired in separate transactions, in exchange for cash, notes and shares of
common stock, Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. ("GEO"), Processos Interactivos
Avanzados, S.A. de C.V. ("PIASA"), certain assets and liabilities of the land
seismic business of Northern Geophysical of America, Inc. ("Northern"), Paragon
Geophysical, Inc. ("Paragon") and Kemp Geophysical Corporation ("Kemp")
(collectively referred to as the "Operating Subsidiaries").
For accounting purposes the acquisitions of Geoevaluaciones and PIASA have been
treated as a recapitalization of Geoevaluaciones and PIASA with Geoevaluaciones
(combined with PIASA) deemed to be the acquiror of the Company and considered
the predecessor company. For purposes of identification and description, the
Company is referred to as the "Predecessor" for the period prior to the Initial
Public Offering and the acquisition of the Operating Subsidiaries and PIASA as
described below, the "Successor" for the period subsequent to the Initial
Public Offering and the acquisition of the Purchased Companies and the
"Company" for both periods. The Company's operations in Latin America (the
"Latin American Operations") are comprised of the operations of Geoevaluaciones
and 3-D Geophysical of Latin America, Inc.
The acquisitions of Northern, Paragon and Kemp were treated as business
combinations accounted for by the purchase method of accounting as prescribed
by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16 and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 48. Northern and Kemp are being valued at the fair market value of
consideration given. In connection with the acquisitions of Northern and Kemp,
the excess of consideration given over the fair market value of net assets
acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years. The
acquisition of Paragon's common stock in exchange for shares of the Company's
Common Stock was accounted for at Paragon's historical costs. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Northern, Kemp and
Paragon from February 9, 1996, the date of the acquisitions. As a result, the
Company's statements of operations for year ended December 31, 1996 is not
comparable to the statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
1995 and 1994, and the Company's balance sheet as of December 31, 1996 is not
comparable to its balance sheet as of December 31, 1995.
The consideration paid to the former owners of Northern, Kemp and Paragon,
which includes certain non-cash investing activities, and the allocation of
such consideration to the acquired assets is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Cash paid for the stock and assets of the acquired companies $ 10,328,000
Debt payable to former owner of Northern 1,149,000
Stock issued to the former owners of Kemp at offering price of $7.50
per share 294,000
Assumption of the liabilities in excess of assets of Paragon (1,070,000)
Liabilities assumed:
Bank overdraft 162,000
Accounts payable 4,984,000
Accrued and other current liabilities 1,130,000
Deferred income tax liabilities 412,099
Debt assumed:
Current 8,007,000
Non-current 3,187,000
------------
Amounts allocated to acquired assets $ 28,583,099
============
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE> 27
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Allocation of the purchase price to the acquired assets:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Accounts receivable:
Trade $ 6,575,000
Other 123,000
Deferred income tax assets 86,532
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 209,000
Property and equipment 14,106,000
Goodwill 6,477,000
Other assets 1,006,567
-----------
$28,583,099
===========
</TABLE>
Pro Forma Information
The accompanying summarized pro forma information for the Company for each of
the two years in the period ended December 31, 1996 represents the operations
of the Company as if the acquisitions of the Operating Subsidiaries and the
Company's Initial Public Offering had occurred on January 1, 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year For the Year
Ended Ended
December 31, December 31,
1995 1996
------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 37,835 $ 55,577
=================== ===================
Extraordinary item, net of tax expense $ - $ 57
=================== ===================
Net income $ 703 $ 638
=================== ===================
Income per share before extraordinary item $ 0.11 $ 0.08
Extraordinary item per share, net of tax
expense - 0.01
------------------- -------------------
Earnings per share $ 0.11 $ 0.09
=================== ===================
</TABLE>
The pro forma results described above assume weighted average common shares
outstanding of 6,232,000 and 7,234,000 shares for the years ended December 31,
1995 and 1996, respectively.
The summarized pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the
actual results that would have been achieved if the public offering and
acquisitions had occurred on the date indicated or which may be realized in the
future.
Basis of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and all of its domestic and foreign subsidiaries. The accounts of
foreign subsidiaries have been adjusted to conform to U.S. accounting
principles and practices and converted to appropriate U.S. dollar equivalents.
All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
27
<PAGE> 28
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Revenue Recognition and Revenue Adjustments
The Company generates revenue through performing seismic data acquisition and
geophysical services. Revenues from seismic data acquisition and geophysical
services are recognized as the work progresses on the percentage of completion
method.
Net sales for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 include contractual
revenue adjustments of $2.6 million and $1.0 million from the Mexican
Operations, for which the related seismic data acquisition and geophysical
services have been provided. These revenue adjustments are based on independent
economic data, primarily the Mexican inflation rate as measured by the consumer
price index. Certain of these revenue adjustments recognized for the year ended
December 31, 1996, for which the Company has the contractual right to invoice,
have not been invoiced pending final review by the Company's major customer in
Mexico. The Company, historically, has been able to collect these revenue
adjustments and, accordingly, the Company has not recorded a valuation
allowance against these amounts as of December 31, 1996
The costs of mobilization and demobilization of equipment to job sites have
been deferred and are being amortized over the life of the project and/or
contract.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investment with original
maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash
The Company's restricted cash, due to a compensating balance arrangement (See
Note 10) is invested in short-term, highly-liquid investments. The carrying
amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these
investments.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
Earnings (loss) per share are calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during
the period, giving effect to the stock split of 2,717.66 to 1 which occurred in
February 1996 in connection with the recapitalization of the Company and the
shares deemed to have been issued as a dividend to the predecessor shareholders
as if these events had occurred on January 1, 1996.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs costs are
expensed in the period incurred. Major improvements to existing property and
equipment are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from 3 to 7
years. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed and the related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated. The related gains or losses are
reflected in income.
Lease Obligations
The Company purchases equipment and vehicles under capital leases. Lease terms
generally range up to two years for equipment and five years for vehicles. The
majority of the leases contain bargain purchase options at the end of the lease
term. In addition, the Company operates primarily in leased facilities under
operating leases and leases some office equipment.
28
<PAGE> 29
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Translation of Foreign Currencies
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries whose functional currency is deemed to
be other than the U.S. dollar are translated at year end rates of exchange and
revenues and expenses are translated at rates of exchange prevailing during the
year. Resulting translation adjustments are accumulated in the currency
translation adjustments component of stockholders' equity. Currency transaction
gains and losses are recognized in income currently.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to the differences between the financial statement
carrying value of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by using enacted tax
rates that are applicable to the future years in which deferred tax assets or
liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. The effect of a change in
tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in earnings in
the period in which the tax rate change was enacted. The Company establishes a
valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset
will not be recovered.
Goodwill
Goodwill, principally from the acquisition of the land-based seismic division
of Northern, represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets
acquired and is being amortized over 15 years using the straight-line method.
The recoverability of non-current operating assets is periodically assessed by
comparing estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows generated by those
assets with their carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the
undiscounted cash flows, goodwill will be eliminated before reducing the
carrying amounts of non-current operating assets.
The following table contains supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
and disclosure of certain non-cash investing and financing activities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
(Predecessor) (Predecessor) (Successor)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash paid for interest $ 449,950 $ 788,900 $ 972,411
Cash paid for income taxes $ 209,006 $ 26,283 $ 615,960
Non-cash investing and financing activities
Purchase of equipment and vehicles through the
assumption of capital lease obligations and
notes payable $ - $ 862,985 $ 1,618,374
Dividend to predecessor shareholders $ - $ - $ 1,000,000
Forgiveness of debt $ - $ - $ 93,000
</TABLE>
29
<PAGE> 30
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates, such as amounts
relating to unbilled accounts receivable and deferred revenues, and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. PUBLIC OFFERINGS OF COMMON STOCK
On February 9, 1996, the Company completed an initial public offering of
4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $7.50 per share.
Subsequently, on February 21, 1996, the underwriters exercised their
overallotment option to purchase an additional 600,000 shares at a price to the
public of $7.50 per share. The proceeds, net of the underwriters' discounts and
offering costs, were approximately $28,457,000. Of these net proceeds,
$3,510,000 was treated, for accounting purposes, as a dividend to the former
stockholders of GEO and PIASA, approximately $10,328,000 was used to purchase
the land seismic assets of Northern and all of the capital stock of Kemp,
approximately $4,599,000 was used to retire certain indebtedness of the
Operating Subsidiaries, $152,000 was used to retire capital leases and
$1,149,000 was paid subsequent to the closing of the acquisitions as a purchase
price adjustment for the purchase of the land seismic assets of Northern. The
Company recognized $57,000 of extraordinary gain (or $.01 per share), net of
tax, from the retirement of a certain portion of the acquired debt.
On December 17, 1996, the Company completed a second public offering of
3,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a price to the public of $7.50 per share.
The net proceeds to the Company (after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expense) were approximately $23,454,000. Of this
amount, $16.4 million has been or will be used for capital expenditures, $4.1
million was used to fund the cash portion of the purchase price for J.R.S.
Exploration and to retire certain existing debt obligations of J.R.S.
Exploration (See Note 16 regarding Subsequent Events), and $3 million was used
to retire indebtedness incurred under the Loan Agreement with First Interstate
Bank of Texas, N.A.
3. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK and BUSINESS SEGMENTS
During each of the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1995, which included only
the operations of GEO and PIASA, one customer accounted for 100.0% of net sales
and during the year ended December 31, 1996, three customers accounted for 23%,
16.9%, and 14.0% of net sales, respectively.
As of December 31, 1995, which consisted only of the accounts of GEO and PIASA,
one customer accounted for 99.0% of accounts receivable and as of December 31,
1996, two customers accounted for 33.3% and 12.6% of accounts receivable,
respectively.
30
<PAGE> 31
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK and BUSINESS SEGMENTS (continued)
The following table presents certain financial information about the operations
of the Company during the year ended December 31, 1996. During 1994 and 1995,
the Company's operations were in Latin America.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
December 31, 1996
-----------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C>
Net revenues $ 51,754
================
United States 39,373
Latin America 12,381
Operating income $ 1,614
================
United States 2,686
Latin America (1,072)
Total assets $ 77,266
================
United States 62,353
Latin America 14,913
</TABLE>
4. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments
is made in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial
Instruments". The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the
Company using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in
interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly,
the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts
that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of
different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating
its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable: The carrying value
amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and accounts payable approximate their fair value.
Long and short-term debt: The carrying amounts of debt instruments approximate
their fair value due to rates of interest being charged on those instruments
being substantially similar to market rates.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information
available to management as of December 31, 1996. Although management is not
aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value
amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of
these financial statements since that date, and current estimates of fair value
may differ significantly from the amount presented herein.
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 1997, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share," was issued. This statement, which is required to be
adopted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997, establishes standards for
computing and
31
<PAGE> 32
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
5. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued)
presenting earnings per share ("EPS") and applies to entities with publicly
held common stock. This Statement simplifies the standards for computing
earnings per share under existing accounting principles and makes it more
comparable to international accounting standards. This Statement requires
restatement of all prior-period EPS data presented, however, management has
determined that the adoption of this standard will not have a significant
impact on the financial statements.
6. COST AND BILLINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
The following represents cost incurred and billings on uncompleted contracts:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------------------------------
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
(in thousands)
-----------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Cost incurred and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts $ - $ 4,932
Billings on uncompleted contracts - 1,999
------------------- ---------------
Unbilled accounts receivable $ - $ 2,933
=================== ===============
Billings on uncompleted contracts $ - $ 2,282
Cost incurred and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts - 746
------------------- ---------------
Deferred revenue $ - $ 1,536
=================== ===============
</TABLE>
Unbilled accounts receivable represents services which the Company has
performed for which it has not yet invoiced customers. Deferred revenue
represents invoices which have been submitted to customers for services which
have yet to be performed. During 1995, the Company's operations, being solely
comprised of Geoevaluaciones and PIASA, were being billed to the customer on a
current basis and, accordingly, there were no revenue accruals or deferred
revenue at December 31, 1995.
7. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------------
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
(in thousands)
---------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mobilization costs $ - $ 466
Prepaid insurance 28 325
Deposits 57 145
Inventory - 50
Prepaid taxes 154 13
---------------------------------------
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 239 $ 999
=======================================
Prepaid expenses $ - $ 507
J.R.S. Exploration acquisition costs - 374
Information system costs - 200
Mobilization costs - 270
Deposits - 177
Other - 60
---------------------------------------
Total non-current other assets $ - $ 1,588
=======================================
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE> 33
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, which includes assets held under capital leases,
consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------------------------
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
(in thousands)
---------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Field equipment $ 2,405 $ 35,283
Transportation equipment 698 3,687
Computer equipment 352 1,246
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures 35 239
Buildings and property - 599
---------------------------------------
3,490 41,054
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,744 5,525
---------------------------------------
Property and equipment, net $ 1,746 $ 35,529
=======================================
</TABLE>
9. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------------------------
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
(in thousands)
-------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Value added tax payable $ 328 $ -
Accrued employee related cost 227 385
Accrued insurance - 308
Accrued contract costs - 203
Advance payments - 243
Accrued taxes - 207
Other accrued expenses 448 $ 166
---------------- ---------------
$ 1,003 $ 1,512
================ ===============
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 34
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATION
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations as of December 31, 1995 and 1996
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------------
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
(in thousands)
------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Note payable to First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A. due in
monthly installments through July 31, 1999 at a variable
interest rate of 9.25% at December 31, 1996 $ - $ 7,712
Revolving Credit Loan with First Interstate Bank of Texas,
N.A., due on May 31, 1997 at a variable interest rate of
9.25% at December 31, 1996 - 2,200
Note payable to former shareholders of the Predecessor, due in
semi-annual installments through February 8, 1998 at a
fixed interest rate of 8.0% - 750
Capital lease obligations to Century Geophysical, due in
monthly installments through May, 1997 at a fixed interest
rate of 12.0% - 107
Capital lease obligations to Southwest Leasing Company, due
in monthly installments through March, 2001 at fixed interest
rates varying from 9.6% to 12.2%. - 1,105
Capital lease obligation to Softech Financial at a fixed interest
rate of 9.4% - 129
Capital lease obligation to Input/Output, Inc. due in monthly
installments through 1996 at a fixed interest rate of 10.0% 182 -
Note payable to Trace Exploration, due in monthly payments through
March, 1997 at a fixed interest rate of 8% - 208
Miscellaneous notes payable and capital lease obligations, interest
payable from 5.9% to 10.75%, due in monthly installments
through January, 2000 - 112
--------------- -----------------
$ 182 $ 12,323
=============== =================
Current portion 182 7,646
Less: Debt issuance costs allocated to current portion - 87
--------------- -----------------
$ 182 $ 7,559
=============== =================
Non-current portion - 4,677
Less: Debt issuance costs allocated to non-current portion - 80
--------------- -----------------
$ - $ 4,597
=============== =================
</TABLE>
On May 31, 1996, the Company acquired seismic data equipment (the "Equipment")
from the manufacturer thereof, Input/Output, Inc. for an aggregate of
approximately $8.5 million in cash and refinanced certain conditional sales
agreements with Input/Output, Inc. for an additional $4.5 million of equipment.
A portion of the purchase price for the Equipment and the funds for the
refinancing were paid from the proceeds of a $12.0 million borrowing under a
$15.0 million term loan (the "Term Loan") from First Interstate Bank of Texas,
N.A. (the "Bank") pursuant to a Loan Agreement between the Company and the
Bank, dated as of May 29, 1996 (the "Loan Agreement"). The Loan Agreement
provides for the Term Loan of $15.0 million, of which $7.3 million is available
for future capital expenditures, and a revolving credit working capital
facility (the "Revolving Credit Loan") of up to $3.0 million, of which
$800,000 was available as of December 31, 1996. The Term Loan is payable in
substantially equal monthly
34
<PAGE> 35
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
10. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS (continued)
installments through July 31, 1999, bears interest at an annual rate equal to
the prime rate plus 1% (9.25% at December 31, 1996) and is collateralized by a
lien on the Company's accounts, accounts receivable, equipment, machinery,
fixtures, inventory, goods, chattel paper, documents, instruments, investment
property, general intangibles and other personal property, whether then owned
or thereafter acquired, and all products and proceeds thereof, and by
guarantees by certain of the Company's subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Loan
may be drawn down from time to time through May 29,1997 in an amount of up to
70% of the Company's "Eligible Accounts" (as defined in the Loan Agreement).
The rate of interest and the security for the Revolving Credit Loan are the
same as those described above for the Term Loan. The Company maintains a
compensating balance, $820,000 at December 31, 1996, under the terms of the
Loan Agreement. This arrangement legally restricts withdrawal or usage of
these cash funds. In the aggregate, they are not material in relation to total
liquid assets. In addition to certain customary affirmative covenants, the
Loan Agreement contains restrictions on the Company with respect to (i)
incurring Debt (as defined), incurring or permitting to exist Liens (as defined
) on its property, assets or revenues, (iii) declaring or paying any dividends
or other distributions on its capital stock (or acquiring any of its capital
stock), (iv) issuing capital stock, (v) entering into transactions with
affiliates, (vi) disposing of assets, and (vii) certain other matters. The Loan
Agreement also contains financial covenants with respect to minimum tangible
net worth, the ratio of tangible net worth to net liabilities and the ratio of
earnings to debt service.
Annual maturities on the Company's notes payable and capital lease obligations
are as follows: (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997 $7,646
1998 $4,250
1999 $243
2000 $184
</TABLE>
During 1996, the Company was in violation of a debt covenant requiring
submission of a Borrowing Base Report within 15 days of each calendar month.
This violation was waived by the Bank subsequent to year end.
11. INCOME TAXES
The provision (benefit) for taxes on income before extraordinary items for
1994, 1995 and 1996 is summarized below (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Predecessor (Successor)
----------------- ---------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $ - $ - $ 417
State - - 89
Foreign 38 - (23)
Deferred:
Federal - - (49)
State - - 60
Foreign 962 130 (24)
----------------- ---------------- -----------------
$ 1,000 $ 130 $ 470
================= ================ =================
</TABLE>
35
<PAGE> 36
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. INCOME TAXES (continued)
The reported amount of income tax expense on consolidated pretax income differs
from the amount of income tax expense that would result from applying domestic
federal statutory tax rates to consolidated pretax income for the following
reasons (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1994 1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Predecessor (Successor)
------------------ ------------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. federal statutory expense $ 987 $ 591 $ 443
State taxes, net of federal benefit - - 78
Foreign income taxed at higher (lower)
rates 13 (461) 66
Meals and entertainment - - 56
Change in the valuation allowance, U.S. - - (417)
Change in the valuation allowance, - -
foreign 244
------------------ ------------------ -------------------
$ 1,000 $ 130 $ 470
================== ================== ===================
</TABLE>
The temporary differences which give rise to deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of December 31, 1995 and 1996 are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
------------------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Domestic current deferred income taxes:
Deferred tax assets:
Vacation accrual $ - $ 75
Allowance for doubtful accounts - 33
------------------- ------------------
Net deferred tax asset - 108
Less valuation allowance - -
------------------- ------------------
$ - $ 108
=================== ==================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Domestic non-current deferred income taxes:
Deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ - $ 323
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards - 134
------------------ ------------------
- 457
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment - 624
Goodwill - 276
------------------ ------------------
- 900
------------------ ------------------
Net deferred income tax liability $ - $ 443
================== ==================
</TABLE>
36
<PAGE> 37
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
11. INCOME TAXES (continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1995 1996
(Predecessor) (Successor)
------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Foreign non-current deferred income taxes:
Deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards $ - $ 1,012
Advance income - 80
------------------ ------------------
Total foreign deferred income tax assets - 1,092
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property and equipment 530 1,342
------------------ ------------------
Net deferred income tax liability before valuation allowance 530 250
Less valuation allowance - (244)
------------------ ------------------
Net deferred income tax liability after valuation allowance $ 530 $ 494
================== ==================
</TABLE>
The decrease of $417,000 in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for
domestic operations in fiscal 1996 related to benefits arising from operating
loss carryforwards attributable to an acquired entity. As of December 31,
1996, the Company has approximately $3,805,000 of net operating loss
carryforwards available to reduce income taxes in future periods. These
carryforwards expire in 2005 and 2010 for the Mexican and U.S. Operations,
respectively. The Company believes it is more likely than not that the
benefits from its net operating loss carryforwards will be realized because it
anticipates having sufficient taxable income in future periods to utilize such
benefits. The Company does not believe that it is more likely than not that
the Company will have sufficient taxable income in Peru to utilize tax benefits
associated with net operating loss carryforwards realized in Peru during 1996.
Accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance of $244,000
against those carryforwards.
Undistributed earnings intended to be reinvested indefinitely by the foreign
subsidiaries totaled $3,566,193 at December 31, 1996. The determination of the
deferred tax liability related to these undistributed earnings is not
practicable. Accordingly, no U.S. deferred income tax has been recorded.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a defendant in or party to a number of lawsuits arising in the
ordinary course of its business, which lawsuits the Company believes have
little substantive merit. While the outcome of these lawsuits cannot be
predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any of these
lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on its operations, cash flows or
financial position.
GEO has a dispute, and may be threatened with litigation, in connection with
certain agreements entered it into with Capilano International Inc., a Canadian
company ("Capilano"). The dispute concerns a certain Letter of Intent and a
certain Technical Assistance Agreement, dated June 3, 1991 and June 1, 1992,
respectively (the "Capilano Agreements"). Capilano stated in its 1994 Annual
Report to Shareholders that it has had difficulty in collecting amounts owing
from a Mexican company (presumably, GEO) to which Capilano supplied technical
assistance and stated in its 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders that it had
written down accounts receivable in Mexico by approximately Canadian $1.9
million (approximately U.S. $1.4 million). GEO maintains that it is not
obligated to compensate Capilano for certain services GEO believes were either
inadequately provided or not provided at all by Capilano and the parties
disagree upon how certain profits and losses should be allocated under the
Capilano Agreements. Representatives of
37
<PAGE> 38
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
Capilano and GEO have had ongoing discussions since May, 1996 in an effort to
resolve this dispute. The Company is not currently able to estimate the effect,
if any, on GEO's results of operations and financial position which may result
from resolution of this matter. Accordingly, the Company's financial
statements do not reflect any adjustment related to this matter. A portion of
the amounts payable to the former stockholders of Geoevaluaciones in connection
with the acquisition by the Company of the stock of Geoevaluaciones owned by
such stockholders is held in escrow and available to pay amounts in settlement
or otherwise in connection with the dispute with Capilano.
The Company leases premises, vehicles and vessels under operating leases.
Rent expense for each of the three years in the period ending December 31, 1996
was $302,140, $298,900, and $3,445,710, respectively. Future minimum lease
payments under operating leases in effect at December 31, 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ending December 31:
<S> <C>
1997 $ 1,608,429
1998 206,929
1999 186,125
2000 175,947
2001 and thereafter 275,737
---------------
$ 2,453,167
===============
</TABLE>
The Company has instituted a 401(k) retirement plan for the benefit of its
employees. All U.S. employees of the Company are eligible to participate after
having completed one year of service. Employees are permitted to make
contributions of up to 16% of their salary to a maximum of $9,500 per year.
The Company contributes an amount equal to one-half of the employee's
contribution up to 4% of the employees salary. During 1996, the Company
contributed $37,200 to the 401(k) plan.
13. COMMON STOCK
Common stock of the Company at December 31, 1995 consisted solely of GEO common
stock of 1,200,000 shares of N$1 (Mexican peso) par value variable capital
stock. GEO and PIASA are required under Mexican law to establish a legal
reserve equal to 5% of each company's earnings until such time as the reserve
equals 20% of the minimum capital of GEO and PIASA. On February 9, 1996, the
former stockholders of Geoevaluaciones (the "Former Geoevaluaciones
Stockholders") sold all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock
of Geoevaluaciones to the Company. Pursuant to the Geoevaluaciones stock
purchase agreement, the aggregate consideration paid to the Former
Geoevaluaciones Stockholders by the Company was: (i) $2.45 million paid in
cash at closing; and (ii) $1.0 million paid by delivery at closing of four
promissory notes, payable in installments at six, 12, 18 and 24 month after the
closing in the following aggregate amounts (which amounts include interest at
8.0% per annum): $290,000, $280,000, $270,000 and $260,000, respectively. In
connection with this acquisition, each of the Former Geoevaluaciones
Stockholders entered into a separate non- competition agreement with the
Company pursuant to which the Company paid to the Former Geoevaluaciones
Stockholders: (i) 100,000 shares of Common Stock held in trusts with Mexican
banks for the benefit of the Former Geoevaluaciones Stockholders, and to be
released February 9, 1998; and (ii) $2.0 million, reduced by the amount of any
liabilities Geoevaluaciones had not disclosed to 3-D and by any amount paid by
Geoevaluaciones to settle or otherwise in connection with Geoevaluaciones'
dispute with Capilano, such portion of the consideration consisting of (a) $1.0
million in cash deposited at the closing at a bank account, which is not
included in the accounts of the Company, and which, subject to any such
reduction, may be disbursed only upon the approval of certain individuals; and
(b) 117,647 shares of Common Stock to be delivered at closing to trusts with
Mexican banks for the benefit of the Former Geoevaluaciones Stockholders, and
which may not be released until June 30, 1997 and then only upon the approval
of certain individuals. Pursuant to such stock purchase agreement, the Company
agreed to assume up to an
38
<PAGE> 39
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. COMMON STOCK (continued)
aggregate of $600,000 of the obligations under any borrowings of
Geoevaluaciones from a bank or other financial institution for working capital
purposes.
On February 6, 1996, the former stockholders of PIASA, pursuant to a stock
purchase agreement dated November 7, 1995, sold all of the shares of PIASA to
the Company. The aggregate consideration paid by the Company was approximately
$300,000, consisting of $60,000 in cash and approximately 28,235 shares of
Common Stock.
In October 1995, the Predecessor and Kemp Geophysical Corporation formed a joint
venture to perform certain land-based seismic data acquisition activities. In
November, the joint venture incurred debt (bearing interest at an annual rate of
10.75% payable over three years) of $3.9 million to acquire an I/O SYSTEM TWO
(R) system. On July 1, 1996, the Company signed a dissolution agreement
terminating the joint venture which provided for the assets to be transferred to
Geoevaluaciones. The debt was repaid in connection with the execution of the
Credit Facility as discussed in Note 10. The Loan Agreement restricts the
payments of dividends and the redemption of capital stock.
The Company's Certificate of Incorporation provides for authorized capital
stock of 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of which
11,100,000 shares were outstanding at December 31, 1996, and 1,000,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share ("Preferred Stock"), of which no
shares were outstanding at December 31, 1996. On February 6, 1996, the Company
effected a 2,717.66 to one stock split of its existing Common Stock. This was
done in conjunction with the recapitalization of the Company immediately prior
to the Company's initial public offering.
In 1996, the Company implemented a Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, the
purpose of which is to provide directors, officers, and other key employees and
consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries with additional incentives by
providing them with the opportunity to increase their ownership interests in
the Company through the granting of options to purchase Common Stock. Options
are generally exercisable in three or four equal installments after each 12
months past the grant date and expire within ten years. The maximum number of
shares of Common Stock that may be subject to awards granted under the Plan is
720,000. In addition, other options were granted to key members of management
outside of the Plan during 1996. Options granted outside of the Plan generally
vest in three equal installments after each 12 months past the grant date and
expire within ten years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted Average
Number Exercise Price
-----------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1, 1996 - -
Outstanding at December 31, 1996 889,052 $ 8.83
Exercisable at December 31, 1996 - -
Granted during 1996 893,352 $ 8.83
Exercised during 1996 - -
Forfeited during 1996 4,300 $ 7.38
Expired during 1996 - -
</TABLE>
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year
is $9.28. In calculating the fair value of options granted, using the
Black-Scholes model, the Company used the following information: a risk-free
interest rate of 6.95%, an expected option life of 7 years, an expected
volatility in the underlying equity security of 61.04%, and expected dividends
of $0.
39
<PAGE> 40
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. COMMON STOCK (continued)
The following information relates to options outstanding as of December 31,
1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted Average
Weighted Average Number Currently Price of Options
Number Exercise Price Remaining Life (years) Exercisable Exercisable
------ ----------------- ---------------------- ---------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
525,000 $ 7.50 9.11 - -
58,900 $ 7.38 9.61 - -
235,150 $ 12.31 9.32 - -
40,002 $ 8.50 9.75 - -
30,000 $ 8.25 9.75 - -
- - ---------------
889,052
===============
</TABLE>
The Company is using the intrinsic value method of accounting for compensation
cost in relation to the granting of stock options under the Plan. There was no
compensation cost recognized in 1996 as the exercise price of options granted
was equal to the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on each grant
date in 1996. The Company would have recognized approximately $78,000 of
compensation cost and realized pro forma net income of $808,000 and pro forma
earnings per share of $0.11 had the fair value based method of accounting been
used to record 1996 compensation cost relating to options granted under the
Plan.
14. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The weighted-average number of shares used in the earnings per share
calculation is determined as following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year
Ending
December 31, 1996
-----------------
<S> <C>
Shares issued to the Company's stockholders giving effect to the
2,717.66 for 1 stock split 1,400,681
Shares deemed to have been issued to fund cash portion
of dividend to Geoevaluaciones stockholders 468,000
Shares issued to acquire Operating Subsidiaries 1,462,496
Shares sold in Initial Public Offering 3,689,694
Shares sold in Secondary Public Offering 76,503
Common stock equivalents, principally common stock options 126,433
---------
Weighted average common shares outstanding 7,223,807
=========
</TABLE>
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Robert Andrews, a director of the Company, is the sole stockholder of The
Andrews Group International, Inc. ("Andrews Group") which, through its Mexican
affiliate, A.G.I. Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, the "Andrews
Companies"), acts as the exclusive representative for several companies in
Mexico, including Input/Output and Landmark Graphics Corporation. During the
year ended December 31, 1996 Geoevaluaciones and PIASA purchased goods and
services from the Andrews Companies which totaled approximately $635,000. In
addition, as of December 31, 1996 PIASA owed the Andrews Companies $65,000 for
goods and services purchased prior to the Initial Public Offering. The Company
anticipates that it will continue to purchase goods and services from the
Andrews Companies. The Company also purchased approximately 1,000 channels of
3-D seismic data acquisition equipment and geophones from Andrews Group during
1996 for $2,942,000.
The Company agreed to pay to a consulting company owned by Mr. John D. White,
Jr. (a director of the Company)
40
<PAGE> 41
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
$250,000 for financial advisory and other consulting services in connection
with the structuring, negotiation and consummation of the acquisitions of the
Operating Subsidiaries and PIASA, of which $125,000 was paid upon consummation
of the initial public offering and $125,000 was paid on January 3, 1997. In
connection with Mr. White's resignation as an executive officer of the Company
and the termination of his employment agreement on October 1, 1996, the Company
agreed to pay Mr. White $200,000 in January 1997 plus $5,000 per month through
December 31, 1998, the expiration date of the employment agreement, to provide
him with office space in the Company's New York City facility through December
31,1997, provided he does not serve as an officer of a competitor of the
Company during that period, and to provide him with certain insurance benefits
through December 31, 1998. In exchange therefor, Mr. White rendered financial
and advisory services to the Company in connection with the Company's second
public offering in December, 1996 and the proposed acquisition of J.R.S.
Exploration. The Company leases space in New York City at an annual base
rental of $165,000 to provide offices for Messrs. Friedman and White (directors
of the Company). Mr. Friedman has agreed to reimburse the Company for any
amounts under the lease that are payable with respect to space that is not
utilized by the Company and which have not been paid by sub-lessees.
The Company leases two shops located in Katy, Texas and in Grand Junction,
Colorado which are owned by Mr. G.C.L.Kemp (an employee of the Company) and by
CBNC Real Estate, L.L.C. ("CBNC"), a partnership owned by certain employees of
the Company, respectively. Aggregate rents paid during 1996 to Mr. Kemp and to
CBNC for these leases total $15,000 and $32,142, respectively.
During 1996, the Company incurred consulting charges in the amount of $77,161
from Comercializadora Y Arrendadora, a consulting company owned by Luis Ferran,
Executive Vice President of Latin American Operations and a director of the
Company.
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January, 1997, the Company completed the purchase of J.R.S. Exploration, a
land-based seismic data acquisition business headquartered in Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. Under the terms of the acquisition, the Company acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of the intermediate holding
companies that own all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of J.R.S.
Exploration for C$3.5 million (U.S.$2.6 million) in cash and 279,166 shares of
Common Stock. In addition the Company repaid approximately C$1.8 million
(U.S.$1.3 million) of debt J.R.S. Exploration owes to a commercial bank. Also
under the terms of the acquisition, Messrs. Donald Janveau and W. Garnet
Mueller, the principal stockholders and executive officers of J.R.S.
Exploration, entered into three-year employment agreements (the "Employment
Agreements") with J.R.S. Exploration pursuant to which Mr. Janveau serves as
President and Chief Executive Officer of J.R.S. Exploration and Mr. Mueller
serves as Vice President of Operations of J.R.S. Exploration. The Employment
Agreements each provide for an annual salary of C$150,000 (U.S.$110,000). In
connection with the Employment Agreements, each of Messrs. Janveau and Mueller
each entered into a five-year covenant not to compete with the Company or any
of its subsidiaries in the provision of seismic data acquisition or analysis
services or any services related thereto. In connection with the acquisition of
J.R.S. Exploration, the Company also acquired all of the issued and outstanding
capital stock of Siegfried & Siegfried Ltd., an Alberta corporation that is
wholly-owned by Mr. C. David Siegfried, an employee of J.R.S. Exploration and
owns certain seismic data acquisition equipment presently being leased to
J.R.S. Exploration. The purchase price for Siegfried & Siegfried Ltd. was
C$150,000 (U.S.$110,000) in cash and 12,500 shares of Common Stock. Under the
terms of this acquisition, Mr. Siegfried entered into a three-year employment
agreement with J.R.S. Exploration pursuant to which Mr. Siegfried serves as
Sales Manager and Operations Supervisor of J.R.S. Exploration. This employment
agreement provides for an annual salary of C$100,000 (U.S.$73,000). In
connection with this employment agreement, Mr. Siegfried entered into a
three-year covenant not to compete with the Company or any of its subsidiaries
in the provision of seismic data acquisition or analysis services or any
services related thereto.
41
<PAGE> 42
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)
On January 7, 1997 the underwriters exercised their overallotment option to
purchase an additional 525,000 shares of Common Stock in conjunction with the
Secondary Public Offering at a price to the public of $7.50 per share. Net
proceeds to the Company from this event were $3,701,250, net of the
underwriters' discount.
On January 31, 1997, Atlantic Richfield Company ("ARCO") notified the Company
of its intent to delay indefinitely the seismic survey which was under contract
with the Company in Peru. Based on this notification, the Company recorded a
$740,000 fourth quarter charge which includes a $100,000 reserve against future
losses attributable to this contract.
42
<PAGE> 43
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None
43
<PAGE> 44
PART III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Company.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30,
1997 pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30,
1997 pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30,
1997 pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to
the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than April 30,
1997 pursuant to Regulation 14A.
44
<PAGE> 45
PART IV.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The financial statements are contained in Item 8 and financial
statement schedules are appended to this Annual Report on Form 10-K
(b) During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996,
the Registrant filed no Current Reports on Form 8-K.
(c) Exhibits.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
2.1 -- Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 8, 1995
between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and Northern Geophysical of
America, Inc. (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") (Incorporated
by reference to exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.2 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., Geo
Acquisition Sub, Inc. and the stockholders of
Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V., dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240))
2.3 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Luis Ferran dated as of October 20, 1995 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.3 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.4 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Antonia Echeverria Castellot dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.5 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Yolanda Blasquiz Leyva dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.6 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Yolanda Echeverria Blasquiz dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.7 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and the
stockholders of Kemp Geophysical Corporation, dated as of
October 24, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.8 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., Geo
Acquisition Sub, Inc. and the Stockholders of Procesos
Interactivos Avanzados, S.A. de C.V., dated as of November
7, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.8 of the
Registrant's Registration on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240))
2.9 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 29, 1995,
among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D Paragon Acquisition Sub,
Inc. and Paragon Geophysical, Inc., as amended (the
"Agreement and Plan of Merger") (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.9 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.10 -- Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
January 23, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.10
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.11 -- Amendment dated January 31, 1996 to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.11 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.12 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D
Geophysical of Canada, Inc., D.E. Janveau, Gladys Mueller
and W.G. Mueller, dated as of December 10, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.12 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.13 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D
Geophysical of Canada, Inc., C. David Siegfried and Peggy J.
Siegfried, dated as of December 10, 1996 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.13 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE> 46
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
---------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
2.14 -- Form of Deed of Trust dated October 20, 1995 among 3-D
Geophysical, Inc., Banca Nacional Financiera S.N.C. and the
beneficiary pursuant to Section 2.2(a) of the
Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.14 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 333-13665))..
2.15 -- Form of Deed of Trust dated October 20, 1995 among 3-D
Geophysical, Inc., Banca Nacional Financiera S.N.C. and the
beneficiary pursuant to Section 2.2(b) of the
Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.15 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
3.1 -- Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
3.2 -- Amended and Restated By-laws of 3-D Geophysical, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
4.1 -- Specimen 3-D Geophysical, Inc. common stock certificate
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
10.1 -- Employment agreement dated February 8, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and G.C.L. Kemp (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.2 -- Employment agreement dated February 6, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Charles O. Merchant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.3 -- Employment agreement dated January 31, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Richard D. Davis (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
10.4 -- Employment agreement dated January 31, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Wayne P. Widynowski (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.5 -- Employment agreement dated September 30, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Ronald L. Koons (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.6 -- Amended and Restated Termination Agreement dated as of
October 1, 1996, between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and John D.
White, Jr. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
10.7 -- Employment agreement dated February 1, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Luis H. Ferran Arroyo (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.8 -- 3-D Geophysical 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan,
as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
10.9 -- Employment agreement dated February 1, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Joel Friedman (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.10 -- Loan Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and First
Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.11 -- Guaranty Agreement by Northern Geophysical of America, Inc.
in favor of First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as
of May 29, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31,
1996 (File No. 0-27564)).
10.12 -- Security Agreement between Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. and
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.13 -- Guaranty Agreement by Paragon Geophysical, Inc. in favor of
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE> 47
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
---------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
10.14 -- Guaranty Agreement by Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. in favor
of First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.15 -- Security Agreement between Northern Geophysical of America,
Inc. and First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of
May 29, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31,
1996 (File No. 0-27564)).
10.16 -- Security Agreement between Paragon Geophysical, Inc. and
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.17 -- Security Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and First
Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8- K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.18 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and Donald E. Janveau.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.19 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and W. G. Mueller. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K field on March 27, 1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.20 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and C. David Siegfried.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.21 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and Donald E. Janveau.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.22 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and W. G. Mueller.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.23 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and C. David Siegfried.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE> 48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, or amendment thereto, to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 31, 1997.
3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC.
BY: /s/ RICHARD DAVIS
---------------------------
Richard Davis
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, this Annual Report on Form 10- K, or amendment thereto, has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on the 31st day of
March, 1997.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title
--------- -----
<S> <C>
/s/ JOEL FRIEDMAN Chairman and Director
-----------------------------------------------
Joel Friedman
/s/ RICHARD DAVIS Chief Executive Officer, President and
----------------------------------------------- Director (principal executive officer)
Richard Davis
/s/ RONALD L. KOONS Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
----------------------------------------------- Secretary and Treasurer (principal
Ronald L. Koons financial and accounting officer)
/s/ LUIS H. FERRAN ARROYO Vice President and Director
-----------------------------------------------
Luis H. Ferran Arroyo
/s/ ROBERT PACE ANDREWS Director
-----------------------------------------------
Robert Pace Andrews
/s/ RALPH M. BAHNA Director
-----------------------------------------------
Ralph M. Bahna
/s/ DOUGLAS W. BRANDRUP Director
-----------------------------------------------
Douglas W. Brandrup
/s/ ARTHUR D. EMIL Director
-----------------------------------------------
Arthur D. Emil
/s/ P. DENNIS O'BRIEN Director
-----------------------------------------------
P. Dennis O'Brien
/s/ EMIR L. TAVELLA Director
-----------------------------------------------
Emir L. Tavella
/s/ JOHN D. WHITE JR. Director
-----------------------------------------------
John D. White, Jr.
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE> 49
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
2.1 -- Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 8, 1995
between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and Northern Geophysical of
America, Inc. (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") (Incorporated
by reference to exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.2 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., Geo
Acquisition Sub, Inc. and the stockholders of
Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V., dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240))
2.3 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Luis Ferran dated as of October 20, 1995 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.3 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.4 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Antonia Echeverria Castellot dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.5 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Yolanda Blasquiz Leyva dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.6 -- Non-Competition Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and
Yolanda Echeverria Blasquiz dated as of October 20, 1995
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.7 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and the
stockholders of Kemp Geophysical Corporation, dated as of
October 24, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.7
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
2.8 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., Geo
Acquisition Sub, Inc. and the Stockholders of Procesos
Interactivos Avanzados, S.A. de C.V., dated as of November
7, 1995 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.8 of the
Registrant's Registration on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240))
2.9 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 29, 1995,
among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D Paragon Acquisition Sub,
Inc. and Paragon Geophysical, Inc., as amended (the
"Agreement and Plan of Merger") (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.9 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
2.10 -- Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of
January 23, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.10
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.11 -- Amendment dated January 31, 1996 to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.11 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.12 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D
Geophysical of Canada, Inc., D.E. Janveau, Gladys Mueller
and W.G. Mueller, dated as of December 10, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.12 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
2.13 -- Stock Purchase Agreement among 3-D Geophysical, Inc., 3-D
Geophysical of Canada, Inc., C. David Siegfried and Peggy J.
Siegfried, dated as of December 10, 1996 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.13 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 50
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
---------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
2.14 -- Form of Deed of Trust dated October 20, 1995 among 3-D
Geophysical, Inc., Banca Nacional Financiera S.N.C. and the
beneficiary pursuant to Section 2.2(a) of the
Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.14 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 333-13665))..
2.15 -- Form of Deed of Trust dated October 20, 1995 among 3-D
Geophysical, Inc., Banca Nacional Financiera S.N.C. and the
beneficiary pursuant to Section 2.2(b) of the
Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.15 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
3.1 -- Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
3.2 -- Amended and Restated By-laws of 3-D Geophysical, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
4.1 -- Specimen 3-D Geophysical, Inc. common stock certificate
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
10.1 -- Employment agreement dated February 8, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and G.C.L. Kemp (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.2 -- Employment agreement dated February 6, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Charles O. Merchant (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.3 -- Employment agreement dated January 31, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Richard D. Davis (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-99240)).
10.4 -- Employment agreement dated January 31, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Wayne P. Widynowski (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.5 -- Employment agreement dated September 30, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Ronald L. Koons (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.6 -- Amended and Restated Termination Agreement dated as of
October 1, 1996, between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and John D.
White, Jr. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
333-13665)).
10.7 -- Employment agreement dated February 1, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Luis H. Ferran Arroyo (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.8 -- 3-D Geophysical 1995 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan,
as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-99240)).
10.9 -- Employment agreement dated February 1, 1996, between 3-D
Geophysical, Inc. and Joel Friedman (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-13665)).
10.10 -- Loan Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and First
Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.11 -- Guaranty Agreement by Northern Geophysical of America, Inc.
in favor of First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as
of May 29, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6
to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31,
1996 (File No. 0-27564)).
10.12 -- Security Agreement between Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. and
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.13 -- Guaranty Agreement by Paragon Geophysical, Inc. in favor of
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 51
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
No. Description of Exhibit
---------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
10.14 -- Guaranty Agreement by Geoevaluaciones, S.A. de C.V. in favor
of First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.15 -- Security Agreement between Northern Geophysical of America,
Inc. and First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of
May 29, 1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31,
1996 (File No. 0-27564)).
10.16 -- Security Agreement between Paragon Geophysical, Inc. and
First Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29,
1996 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.17 -- Security Agreement between 3-D Geophysical, Inc. and First
Interstate Bank of Texas, N.A., dated as of May 29, 1996
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8- K dated May 31, 1996
(File No. 0-27564)).
10.18 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and Donald E. Janveau.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.19 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and W. G. Mueller. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K field on March 27, 1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.20 -- Employment Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between J.R.S.
Exploration Company Limited and C. David Siegfried.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.21 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and Donald E. Janveau.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.22 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and W. G. Mueller.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
10.23 -- Non-Competition Agreement dated January 27, 1997 between
J.R.S. Exploration Company Limited and C. David Siegfried.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K field on March 27,
1997 (No. 0-27564)).
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 18,444
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 14,284
<ALLOWANCES> 83
<INVENTORY> 50
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 34,034
<PP&E> 41,054
<DEPRECIATION> 5,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 77,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 23,567
<BONDS> 4,597
0
0
<COMMON> 111
<OTHER-SE> 48,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 77,266
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 51,754
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 40,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 10,108
<LOSS-PROVISION> 38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,021
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,299
<INCOME-TAX> 470
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 829
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 57
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 886
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.12
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.12
</TABLE>
