AGL RESOURCES INC
U-1/A, EX-99.2, 2000-07-31
NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION
Previous: AGL RESOURCES INC, U-1/A, EX-99.1, 2000-07-31
Next: AGL RESOURCES INC, U-1/A, EX-99.3, 2000-07-31




Exhibit C-2

                            COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

                          STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION

                           AT RICHMOND, JULY 28, 2000

JOINT PETITION OF

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC.,

CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY,

         and

AGL RESOURCES INC.                                            CASE NO. PUA000054


For approval of a stock
purchase  agreement  under
Chapter 5 of Title 56 of
the Code of Virginia


                                   FINAL ORDER

     On June 22, 2000, Dominion Resources,  Inc. ("DRI"),  Consolidated  Natural
Gas  Company   ("CNG"),   and  AGL  Resources   Inc.   ("AGLR")   (collectively,
"Petitioners")  filed their Joint Petition  seeking  approval under Chapter 5 of
Title 56 of the Code of Virginia of a stock purchase  agreement whereby Virginia
Natural Gas, Inc., ("VNG") would become a wholly owned subsidiary of AGLR.

     Petitioners  have  also  requested  that  the  Commission  issue  a  letter
certifying to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") that the Commission
has the resources to, and does currently exercise,  regulatory jurisdiction over
the rates,  services, and operation of VNG and that it will continue to exercise
that jurisdiction following the acquisition.

                                        1

<PAGE>


     AGLR is a Georgia corporation  operating as holding company for Atlanta Gas
Light Company and its wholly owned subsidiary,  Chattanooga Gas Company, as well
as a number of non-utility  subsidiaries and joint ventures.  Under the terms of
Petitioners' agreement, CNG will sell, convey,  transfer,  assign and deliver to
AGLR all of the issued and  outstanding  shares of capital stock of VNG for $550
million,  payable in cash at closing, subject to certain modifications described
in the Joint Petition.  As a result of the transaction,  VNG's common stock will
not be changed,  but it will be owned directly or indirectly by AGLR.  AGLR will
remained headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, while VNG's headquarters will remain
in Norfolk.

     The  transaction,  with its financing  activities and  intrasystem  service
arrangements,  will also  require the approval of the SEC under the terms of the
Public Utility  Holding Company Act of 1935 ("1935 Act").  Upon  consummation of
the transaction,  AGLR will register with the SEC as a holding company under ss.
5 of the 1935 Act.  Approval of the transaction  must also come from the Federal
Trade Commission ("FTC").  Our order of January 28, 2000, in Case No. PUA990020,
approving  the  merger  of CNG and  DRI,  conditioned  that  approval  upon  the
subsequent  divestiture or spin-off of VNG. The FTC imposed a similar  condition
in its Decision and Order in approving that merger.  The instant  application is
in satisfaction of these  conditions.

     On June 27, 2000, the  Commission  entered its Order for Notice and Comment
in this matter,  directing  parties  interested  in  commenting  on the proposed
transaction to file such comments

                                        2


<PAGE>



or requests for hearing on or before July 19, 2000. None were received.  On July
19, 2000,  Petitioners  filed the affidavits of VNG's Manager of  Communications
and General Manager of Operations and Customer Service attesting that the notice
and service directed in the Order for Notice and Comment had been timely
accomplished.

     On July 20, 2000, the Staff of the State Corporation  Commission ("Staff"),
the  Petitioners,  and VNG entered into a Joint  Agreement to resolve the issues
raised  by the Joint  Petition  and filed a Motion  for  Consideration  of Joint
Agreement.  The  Staff and the  parties  represented  that,  if  adopted  by the
Commission, the Joint Agreement would result in a fair, reasonable and efficient
resolution  of the  proceeding,  assure that the  statutory  standard set out in
ss.56-90  of the Code of  Virginia  is met,  and  otherwise  protect  the public
interest.

     The principal components of the Joint Agreement include:

     1.  VNG  has  forecasted   that  it  intends  to  make  plant  and  capital
expenditures  of $143.6  million  during  the  period  2000-2004  to extend  its
facilities  to new customers and to maintain and improve the level of service to
existing  customers.  AGLR  and VNG  represent  that  service  quality  will not
deteriorate in VNG's service territory as a result of the acquisition.  VNG will
report annually on its capital  expenditures  for the preceding year and explain
any deviation from planned  investment,  demonstrating  that service quality has
not been adversely affected thereby.

                                        3


<PAGE>



     2.  AGLR  and  VNG's  representation  that  quality  of  service  will  not
deteriorate due to any material  reduction in the number of employees  providing
services.

     3. AGLR and VNG's  representation  that the acquisition will not materially
impact the cost of  capitalization  used for  ratemaking  for VNG.  AGLR and VNG
agree that if such  adverse  impact  occurs,  they shall not seek to recover any
resulting cost of capital increases from VNG customers.

     4. AGLR and VNG's  representation  that the acquisition will not affect the
Commission's  regulatory  authority  with  regard to VNG,  and  their  pledge to
continue to maintain a high degree of cooperation with the Staff and to take all
actions necessary to ensure VNG's timely response to Staff inquiries with regard
to their provision of service in Virginia.

     The Staff filed the Report of its  investigation of the application on July
24, 2000. The Report recommended approval of the proposed acquisition subject to
the terms of the Joint  Agreement.  Further,  Staff  recommended  that any order
authorizing the acquisition make clear that such  authorization  does not extend
to any subsequent  affiliate financing or service arrangements that will require
separate applications under Chapters 3 or 4 of Title 56 of the Code of Virginia.
In  short,  Staff  concluded  that  with  the  conditions  set out in the  Joint
Agreement and as supplemented in the Report,  adequate  service to the public at
just and reasonable  rates would not be jeopardized by our approval of the Joint
Petition.

                                        4


<PAGE>



     NOW THE COMMISSION, having considered the Joint Petition. the Staff Report,
and the  proposed  Joint  Agreement,  is of the opinion and finds that the Joint
Agreement should be approved without modification.  We find, consistent with the
requirements of ss. 56-90 of the Code of Virginia,  that the provisions of Joint
Agreement will ensure that adequate service to the public at just and reasonable
rates will not be impaired or jeopardized.  We further find, based on the record
in this proceeding, that following the acquisition we will continue to have, and
will exercise,  regulatory  jurisdiction over the rates, services, and operation
of VNG. With respect to the Petitioners' request that we provide a certification
letter  to the SEC,  we  direct  the Staff to  prepare  and file an  appropriate
response with the proper officials at the SEC upon their request for the same.

     Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

     (1) The Motion for Consideration of Joint Agreement is granted.

     (2) The  Joint  Petition  is  hereby  approved  subject  to the  terms  and
conditions of the Joint Agreement.

     (3) The Joint  Agreement is adopted in full herein and the  Petitioners and
VNG are  ORDERED to comply  with its terms and with the  conditions  established
therein.

     (4) Except to the extent set out in the Joint Agreement adopted above, this
Order shall have no ratemaking implications.

     (5) The  authorizations  approved  herein do not  extend to any  subsequent
affiliate financing or service arrangements that will

                                        5

<PAGE>


require separate  applications  under Chapters 3 or 4 of Title 56 of the Code of
Virginia.

     (6) There being  nothing  further to be done in this  matter,  it is hereby
dismissed.

     AN ATTESTED  COPY HEREOF shall be sent by the Clerk of the  Commission  to:
Stephen H. Watts, II, Esquire,  Dominion Resources,  Inc., One James Center, 901
East Cary Street,  Richmond,  Virginia 23219-4030;  Edward L. Flippen,  Esquire,
Kodwo  Ghartey-Tagoe,  Esquire,  and David K. Dewey,  Esquire,  McGuire,  Woods,
Battle &  Boothe,  L.L.P.,  1 James  Center,  901 East  Cary  Street,  Richmond,
Virginia 23219-4030;  James F. Stutts,  Esquire,  Dominion Resources,  Inc., 120
Tredgar Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219; J. Alan Crittenden,  Esquire, Dominion
Resources,  Inc.,  615  Liberty  Avenue,  CNG  Tower,  Pittsburg,   Pennsylvania
15222-3199;  Donald A.  Fickenscher,  Esquire,  Virginia Natural Gas, Inc., 5100
East Virginia Beach Boulevard,  Norfolk,  Virginia 23502-3488;  Paul R. Shlanta,
Esquire,  AGL Resources Inc., 817 Peachtree  Street,  N.E., Suite 1000,  Atlanta
Georgia 30308; John F. Dudley,  Senior Assistant  Attorney General,  Division of
Consumer  Counsel,  Office of Attorney  General,  900 East Main  Street,  Second
Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219; and the Commission's Divisions of Economics and
Finance, Energy Regulation, and Public Utility Accounting.

                                        6




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission