<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A-2
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996,
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition period from _____ to _________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-27406
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 94-3173928
(State or other (I.R.S.
jurisdiction of Employer
incorporation or Identification
organization) No.)
3400 WEST BAYSHORE ROAD, PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94303
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (415) 843-2800
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the
Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the Registrant was approximately $42,702,270 as of February 28, 1997, based
upon the closing sale price on the Nasdaq National Market reported for such
date. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each
person who owns 5% of more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in
that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of
affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
There were 9,084,896 shares of Registrant's Common Stock issued and
outstanding as of February 28, 1997.
The "C with interlocking hemisphere" logo (used alone and with the
Company's name), "Connective", "ConXn(TM)" and "Ridaura(R)" are trademarks of
the Company. All other tradenames and trademarks appearing in this Prospectus
are the property of their respective holders.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates information by reference from the definitive proxy
statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 14, 1997.
<PAGE> 2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Special Note: Except for the historical information contained therein,
the following discussion consists of forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to differ
materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and
uncertainties include, without limitation, those factors below under the heading
"Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results."
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. ("Connective" or the "Company") acquires,
develops and markets products in the areas of rheumatology and dermatology. The
Company is specifically focused on commercialization of novel therapies and has
accumulated an extensive portfolio of late stage development products through
acquisition and in-licensing strategies. With the acquisition of Ridaura(R) in
December 1996, its first marketed product for rheumatoid arthritis, the Company
is developing market franchises in the United States using its own sales force
and plans to work with partners to commercialize its products in markets outside
the U.S.
In March 1997, the Company's Board of Directors approved a change of
the Company's name to "Connetics Corporation." This name change is subject to
the approval of the Company's stockholders at its annual meeting in May 1997.
Since its founding in 1993, Connective has rapidly built its product
pipeline through acquisition and in-licensing of currently marketed and late
stage development products. Focused exclusively on connective tissue and
autoimmune diseases, the Company has identified markets with high medical needs
and significant commercial potential, but which the Company believes are
presently underserved and lacking new products and technologies. The indications
or conditions addressed by the Company include atopic dermatitis, keloids,
scleroderma, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis. Patients
suffering from these conditions experience a variety of chronic problems
depending on the particular condition, including excessive uncontrollable
itching, extensive rashes and lesions, hardening of the skin and internal
organs, severe scarring and lack of mobility. The most severe of these diseases
cause painful disfigurement, disability and, in certain cases, death. The
Company estimates that over six million Americans suffer from its targeted
diseases in various forms, with over five billion dollars spent annually on
treatments that are mostly palliative in nature. Although individually these
diseases have been the subject of various independent research programs, no
concentrated effort has been aimed at developing this market segment as a whole.
Connective's mission is to meet the needs of patients suffering from connective
tissue and autoimmune diseases and to become a major force in providing
therapeutic alternatives for these diseases which are predominantly treated by
rheumatologists and dermatologists.
With the acquisition in December 1996 of U.S. and Canadian rights to
Ridaura(R), an established treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, from SmithKline
Beecham Corporation, Connective was able to immediately
-2-
<PAGE> 3
enter the rheumatology market. The Company is currently building a market
presence within its target markets and expects sales from Ridaura(R) to help
fund the establishment of its sales and marketing organization. The Company's
strategy is to further build its sales, marketing and distribution expertise
with the acquisition of additional marketed products, and future new product
introductions from its development pipeline. There are approximately 10,000
rheumatologists and dermatologists in the United States, a concentrated
physician base that the Company believes can be effectively targeted with a
focused sales force. The Company plans to strategically position field sales
representatives in large metropolitan areas with high concentrations of target
physicians, and the Company's marketing team will supplement sales efforts with
both national and regional promotion programs.
The Company's development portfolio consists of four products. Gamma
interferon 1(b) ("gamma interferon") is in Phase III testing for the treatment
of atopic dermatitis and Phase II testing for keloids. Betamethasone mousse will
be evaluated in a Phase III clinical trial that commenced in April 1997 for the
treatment of scalp psoriasis. ConXn(TM) (recombinant human relaxin H2)
("relaxin") is in Phase II testing for the treatment of scleroderma. T-cell
receptor peptide vaccines ("TCR vaccines") are being evaluated in a Phase I/II
trial for multiple sclerosis and preclinical studies for rheumatoid arthritis.
BACKGROUND
Connective tissue is composed of cells (such as fibroblasts) and the
extracellular matrix (such as collagen-containing fibers) produced by these
cells. Organs of the body such as lungs, kidneys and skin function normally in
part because of the precise three-dimensional arrangement of specialized cells
within a connective tissue framework. Alterations in this framework affect organ
function.
DISEASES INVOLVING CONNECTIVE TISSUE
Inflammation
Inflammation is a natural response to tissue injury and is necessary
for normal healing. During normal wound healing, tissue repair follows an
orderly progression of immune cell infiltration, new blood vessel formation and
connective tissue deposition and remodeling. Under abnormal conditions,
inappropriate regulation of the immune cells results in either local or
widespread tissue injury. Many disorders associated with inflammation occur in
response to an unknown stimulus that misdirects the inflammation process against
normal tissue. This lack of appropriate regulation generally results in chronic,
progressive disease conditions that may ultimately lead to dysfunction or
destruction of the affected organ system.
As an example, atopic dermatitis is a common inflammatory skin disease
resulting in incessant itching, extensive rashes and lesions and, in its severe
form, can cause physical disfigurement, occupational disability and
psychological trauma. Severe chronic atopic dermatitis may also result in
hospitalization and days lost from work and school. Although the primary cause
of atopic dermatitis is unknown, substantial evidence suggests that excessive
production of IgE (a type of antibody) directed to both food and inhalant
allergens contributes to the pathogenesis of the
-3-
<PAGE> 4
disease. Recent market studies have suggested that over 1,800,000 individuals in
the U.S. suffer from atopic dermatitis, generating approximately 1,000,000
office visits per year. It is estimated that approximately 200,000 patients
suffer from the severe form of the disease. Atopic dermatitis is treated
primarily by dermatologists. Current treatments, consisting largely of topical
corticosteroids, emollients and antihistamines to control itching, have been
less than satisfactory. Patients with severe disease receive some benefit from
systemic corticosteroids, but this therapy is associated with significant
long-term side effects. Should bacterial infection occur in these patients,
antibiotic therapy is typically initiated and requires the patient to be
hospitalized.
Abnormal Remodeling
Connective tissue undergoes constant turnover through a normal
remodeling process that links the breakdown of the collagen-based extracellular
matrix with the synthesis of new collagen. The body's ability to regulate this
process normally keeps the amount of connective tissue, which is 95% collagen,
in balance. When this balance is broken, as in the case of certain chronic
diseases, the result can lead to the increase in or breakdown of collagen. Both
excessive formation or destruction of connective tissue can result in serious
disease. There is currently no approved therapy that has been documented to have
significant beneficial effect on the clinical course of abnormal remodeling.
As an example, the overproduction of collagen can result in keloid
formation, hypertrophic scarring and severe systemic disorders, such as
scleroderma and pulmonary fibrosis. Keloids and hypertrophic scars are abnormal
healing responses that occur in the skin, resulting in large, painful, elevated
scars that are unattractive in appearance. There are approximately 300,000
patients treated by dermatologists and plastic surgeons for keloids every year.
Scleroderma is one of the most serious diseases involving the uncontrolled
formation of connective tissue. Approximately 300,000 individuals, primarily
women, suffer from various forms of this disease, with approximately 60,000
having severe, or diffuse scleroderma. In its most severe form, the disease has
a five year mortality rate in 50-70% of cases. Scleroderma is primarily treated
by rheumatologists. Currently there is no cure for this fatal disease and few
therapies ease the pain and suffering of scleroderma patients. Pulmonary
fibrosis represents a group of diseases associated with chronic inflammation and
increase in fibrotic tissue in the walls of the alveolar spaces in the lung.
Ultimately, these diseases result in scarring of lung tissue, impairment of lung
function, and in many cases, death. Approximately 144,000 individuals suffer
from pulmonary fibrosis. Pulmonary fibrosis is primarily treated by
pulmonologists, oncologists and rheumatologists.
Autoimmune Disorders
Connective tissue can also be attacked by various T cell-mediated
autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune diseases are generally believed to result from
an inappropriate response of the immune system. The immune system is the body's
major biological defense mechanism, first distinguishing antigens (foreign
substances) from the body's tissue and then eliminating a wide variety of
disease-causing antigens, such as bacteria and viruses. A major component of
this system are T cells. In many autoimmune diseases, these T cells go awry and
attack the body's healthy tissues. There is mounting evidence that these
disease-causing T cells are concentrated at the disease site, where they
initiate signals leading to tissue destruction. The mechanism
-4-
<PAGE> 5
responsible for causing these T cells to attack healthy tissue has, for the most
part, not been identified. Autoimmune diseases can attack virtually any tissue
or organ of the body, are often debilitating and can be fatal.
For example, rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that
attacks the connective tissue in the joints. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic
disease in which the body's immune system leads to an attack on synovial tissue,
resulting in progressive, painful inflammation and destruction of the joints. In
advanced stages of the disease, symptoms include severe pain, body disfigurement
and loss of mobility. It is estimated that between one and two percent of the
adult U.S. population, or more than two million individuals, have rheumatoid
arthritis. Women are three times more susceptible than men. No current therapy
cures the disease and often its progression cannot be stopped. The efficacy of
currently used drugs tends to be directly correlated with systemic toxicity.
Rheumatoid arthritis is primarily treated by rheumatologists. Another example of
an autoimmune disease is multiple sclerosis, a chronic inflammatory disease of
the central nervous system in which the body's immune system attacks myelin, a
substance that encircles and insulates nerve fibers. Multiple sclerosis can
result in impaired mobility, visual impairment, slurred speech, poor bladder
control, sexual dysfunction and, ultimately, confinement to a wheelchair.
Approximately 250,000 persons suffer from multiple sclerosis in the United
States. Multiple sclerosis is primarily treated by neurologists. However, none
of the currently available treatments address the underlying cause of the
disease.
CONNECTIVE STRATEGY
The key elements of Connective's strategy include:
- Focus on the Treatment of Serious and Chronic Diseases Involving
Connective Tissue. The Company's products and technologies are focused on the
treatment of diseases involving connective tissues caused by inflammation,
abnormal remodeling and autoimmune disorders. These diseases include serious
skin and skin structure diseases, such as atopic dermatitis and keloids, as well
as scleroderma, organ fibroses, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.
Although individually these diseases have been the subject of various
independent research programs, no concentrated effort has been aimed at the
market segment as a whole, representing significant and currently underserved
therapeutic market opportunities. The Company believes that its focus on
diseases involving connective tissue, combined with its technological and
marketing expertise, maximizes the likelihood of success in rapidly developing
and effectively commercializing products.
- Develop Marketing Organization Targeting Rheumatologists and
Dermatologists. The Company is targeting its commercial activities at
rheumatologists and dermatologists, which can be served by a focused,
specialized marketing organization. Scalp psoriasis, betamethasone mousse's lead
indication, and atopic dermatitis and keloids, gamma interferon's lead
indications, are treated primarily by dermatologists. Scleroderma, ConXn(TM)'s
lead indication, is primarily treated by rheumatologists. With the acquisition
of rights to Ridaura(R), an established treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, the
company was able to enter the U.S. and Canadian rheumatology market in December
1996. As such, the Company's strategy is to target its marketing activities to
the approximately 3,000 rheumatologists and 7,000 dermatologists practicing in
the United States. In
-5-
<PAGE> 6
addition, because these rheumatologists and dermatologists are primarily
concentrated in major metropolitan areas, they can be effectively served by a
relatively small sales force.
- In-License Clinical-Stage and Currently Marketed Products. The
Company expects to continue to in-license and acquire rights to clinical-stage
products and currently marketed products for the treatment of diseases involving
connective tissue. To date, the Company has in-licensed both gamma interferon
and relaxin from Genentech, and has acquired rights to TCR Peptide technology
primarily from Genentech and XOMA Corporation, exclusive license rights to
betamethasone mousse from Soltec Research PTY Ltd., and exclusive U.S. and
Canadian rights to Ridaura(R) from SmithKline Beecham Corporation and related
entities ("SmithKline Beecham"). Increasing consolidation in the pharmaceutical
and biotechnology industries and continuing changes in the health care system
are changing the way therapeutic products are developed and marketed. As a
result, the Company believes there are significant opportunities to in-license
or acquire additional products from pharmaceutical companies that are not being
developed or optimally promoted by these companies or do not fit in the present
business strategy of such companies, or from research and academic institutions.
The Company believes it is well-positioned to expand its product portfolio by
licensing such products because of its market focus, complementary products in
development and relevant management experience in product development and
marketing. The Company believes that this strategy can result in accelerated
development and commercialization of novel products to treat serious diseases
involving connective tissue at significantly lower capital requirements than
most biotechnology companies while minimizing the Company's exposure to the
risks inherent in drug discovery and basic research.
- Leverage Platform Technology and Products for Additional Indications.
The Company is leveraging its product pipeline by developing its products for
multiple indications targeted at its strategic markets. In addition, the Company
believes ConXn(TM) and its TCR Peptide technology can be developed for uses
outside its strategic markets. Such uses include burn scarring and ophthalmic
fibrosis for ConXn(TM), and inflammatory bowel disease and Type 1 diabetes for
TCR Peptides. To target such uses, the Company plans to either retain such
products in-house or license them to third parties.
- Utilize Corporate Partnerships to Pursue Additional Markets. In its
strategic markets, the Company plans to retain commercial rights to its products
in North America and to enter into corporate partnerships with respect to
additional market segments in North America and international markets. This
strategy will allow the Company to pursue additional therapeutic markets, offset
near term development costs and enter international markets. The Company intends
to pursue collaborative relationships to provide funding and consulting support
for the Company's research and development programs and to assist in the
clinical and regulatory development and commercialization of specific products
outside of North America.
- Minimize Drug Discovery and Manufacturing Costs. The Company has
sought to minimize the costs of drug discovery and manufacturing by in-licensing
later-stage development and currently marketed products, outsourcing
manufacturing and utilizing research collaborators and consultants. To date, the
Company's clinical supplies have been manufactured by third parties
-6-
<PAGE> 7
on a contract basis. The Company also initially intends to use third parties for
the manufacture of its commercial products, including Ridaura(R), which is being
manufactured for the Company by SmithKline through December 2001. The Company
believes it will be able to minimize costly infrastructure by continuing to use
external resources where appropriate.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
The Company has products in various stages of development as
illustrated in the table below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRODUCT INDICATION DEVELOPMENT STATUS
------- ---------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Gamma Interferon Severe Atopic Dermatitis Phase III
Keloids Phase II
ConXn(TM) Scleroderma Phase II
TCR Peptide vaccine Multiple Sclerosis Phase I/II
TCR Peptide vaccine Rheumatoid Arthritis Preclinical
Betamethasone mousse Psoriasis Phase III
</TABLE>
Gamma Interferon Development Program
Gamma interferon is a member of a family of proteins involved in the
regulation of the immune system, and has been shown to be effective in the
treatment of certain immune-mediated diseases. Gamma interferon is an FDA
licensed product, manufactured and marketed by Genentech for an orphan disease,
chronic granulomatous disease (CGD). Gamma interferon also has been shown to
inhibit the production of IgE (a type of antibody) and collagen. Because of
these biological properties, the Company is developing gamma interferon for use
in the treatment of atopic dermatitis and keloids.
Atopic Dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis is a common inflammatory skin
disease. Although the primary cause of atopic dermatitis is unknown, evidence
suggests that excessive production of IgE contributes to the pathogenesis of the
disease. Severe atopic dermatitis, targeted by the Company, may result in
hospitalization for control of skin disease and infection, physical
disfigurement, occupational disability, work and school days lost and
psychological trauma. Recent market reviews have suggested that over 1,800,000
individuals suffer from atopic dermatitis, generating approximately 1,000,000
office visits per year. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 patients
suffer from the severe form of the disease. Current treatments provide only
modest benefits and are associated with significant long-term side effects.
In vitro studies have shown that gamma interferon can inhibit the
production of IgE. In addition, published reports indicate that patients with
atopic dermatitis produced decreased endogenous gamma interferon. Because of
these observations, several initial clinical studies were performed, including a
Phase I/II pilot study conducted by Genentech to assess the tolerance, safety,
and efficacy of gamma interferon in reducing clinical severity of skin disease
in 22 patients with atopic dermatitis. Overall, there was a progressive and
significant reduction in total clinical severity of atopic dermatitis observed
in these studies. Genentech also provided material for a placebo controlled
Phase II trial in 83 patients with severe atopic dermatitis. Patients receiving
-7-
<PAGE> 8
gamma interferon experienced a statistically significantly greater improvement
in atopic dermatitis, compared with those in the placebo group. Gamma interferon
treatment benefit was also demonstrated by a reduction in itching and in the
severity of associated atopic conditions. Treatment was well tolerated, without
evidence of significant toxicity. Several patients continued to receive gamma
interferon therapy for more than two years, with no evidence of significant
drug-related clinical or laboratory toxicity. Based on these studies, the
Company commenced a Phase III clinical trial in 1996 for the use of gamma
interferon in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis.
Keloids. Keloids are abnormal healing responses caused by excess
collagen production, and typically occur in the skin of susceptible individuals
resulting in large, painful, elevated scars which are usually unattractive in
appearance. There are approximately 300,000 patients treated by dermatologists
and plastic surgeons for keloids every year. Although existing therapies are
potentially efficacious, recurrence after therapy is frequent.
In vitro studies have shown that gamma interferon can inhibit collagen
synthesis and production. Phase I/II trials conducted by independent
investigators in collaboration with Genentech have shown preliminary results
indicating that gamma interferon may be efficacious in the treatment of keloids
and hypertrophic scars. One study involved ten patients who received
intralesional therapy (injection directly into the keloid) for keloids or
hypertrophic scars. At 18 weeks, five of ten keloids or scars decreased by 50%
or more. Therapy was well tolerated and all patients completed the ten week
course of treatment. Another placebo-controlled study of intralesional therapy
was conducted in ten patients with keloids. Six of eight patients completing the
study showed clinically significant responses in reduction of the size of gamma
interferon-treated keloids, as compared to the placebo-treated keloids. In
addition, another patient had a keloid surgically excised and then the site of
excision was injected with gamma interferon; this patient also showed
significant improvement in the gamma interferon-treated keloid at one year of
follow-up. Therapy was well tolerated with no dosage reductions or patient
terminations due to adverse effects of treatment. Based on this in vitro and
clinical information, the Company initiated a Phase II clinical trial in 1996 to
demonstrate the efficacy of gamma interferon therapy in patients with keloids.
ConXn(TM) Development Program
ConXn(TM) is a naturally occurring peptide hormone that promotes
remodeling of connective tissues. Research by two of the Company's founders and
their colleagues has shown that ConXn(TM) can inhibit excessive connective
tissue formation and promote connective tissue remodeling through at least three
mechanisms: inhibiting the production of collagen by fibroblasts, increasing the
production of collagenase (the enzyme that breaks down collagen) and decreasing
the production of TIMP (a protein that blocks collagenase action). These results
have been confirmed by in vitro studies and in vivo animal models of human
disease. ConXn(TM) can now be produced in significant quantities by outside
contractors using the Company's recombinant manufacturing techniques. Connective
is currently developing the recombinant form of ConXn(TM) for use in the
treatment of scleroderma and other fibrotic conditions, including organ fibrosis
and fibromyalgia.
-8-
<PAGE> 9
Scleroderma. Scleroderma, sometimes referred to as systemic sclerosis,
is a generalized disorder of connective tissue characterized clinically by
thickening and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, including the heart,
lungs, kidneys and gastrointestinal tract. Although the underlying cause of this
disease is unknown, the overproduction and accumulation of collagen and other
extracellular matrix proteins in skin and other organs often leads to severe and
painful disfigurement, quality of life impairment, dysfunction of vital organs
and death. There are in excess of 300,000 individuals suffering from
scleroderma, with a five-year mortality rate of 50-70% in the most severe cases
of the disease. There are no effective treatments for this disease; current
therapies are directed to alleviating the symptoms of the disease, not the
underlying cause.
The Company has completed a Phase I/II clinical trial for recombinant
human ConXn(TM) in patients with scleroderma. This study examined the safety and
pharmacokinetics of continuous subcutaneous infusion of ConXn(TM) for 28 days at
five different dose levels compared to placebo. Thirty patients with a history
of at least two years with systemic sclerosis were enrolled in a randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Administration of ConXn(TM) was well
tolerated through 28 days at all dose levels. In addition, during global
assessments performed at the end of the study, ten of 20 patients receiving
ConXn(TM) reported improvement versus two percent receiving placebo. No serious
adverse events were observed and no patients dropped out of the study. These
safety and pharmacokinetic observations support continued clinical evaluation of
ConXn(TM) for the treatment of scleroderma. The Company completed enrollment in
a Phase II clinical trial in patients with scleroderma in September 1996.
The Company has been granted Orphan Drug Status for ConXn(TM) for
treatment of progressive systemic sclerosis, a severe form of scleroderma. In
the United States, the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 provides incentives to drug
manufacturers to develop and manufacture products for the treatment of rare
diseases, currently defined as diseases that affect fewer than 200,000
individuals in the United States, or for a disease that affects more than
200,000 individuals in the United States where the sponsor does not
realistically anticipate its product becoming profitable. Under the Orphan Drug
Act, a manufacturer of a designated orphan product can seek certain tax
benefits, and the holder of the first FDA approval of a designated orphan
product will be granted a seven-year period of marketing exclusivity for that
product for the orphan indication. While the marketing exclusivity of an orphan
drug would prevent other sponsors from obtaining approval of the same product
for the same indication, it would not prevent other types of products from being
approved for the same use. The U.S. Congress has considered and may consider in
the future, legislation that would restrict the duration of the market
exclusivity of an orphan drug and, thus, there can be no assurance that the
benefits of the existing statute will remain in effect.
In addition to scleroderma, the Company believes ConXn(TM) may have
potential in treating fibromyalgia and organ fibroses, such as pulmonary
fibrosis. Fibromyalgia is a rheumatic disorder which is believed to affect
approximately two percent of the population in United States. The disease is
characterized by achy pain, tenderness and stiffness in muscles. The condition
occurs mainly in females and may be induced by physical or mental stress, poor
sleep, trauma or exposure to dampness or cold.
-9-
<PAGE> 10
Pulmonary Fibrosis. Pulmonary fibrosis, also known as interstitial lung
disease, represents a group of diseases associated with chronic inflammation and
excessive production of collagen in the walls of the alveolar spaces in the
lung. Approximately 144,000 individuals suffer from this disease. In the case of
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis the underlying cause of the fibrosis is unknown,
while other cases may be associated with another disease process, such as
scleroderma, or due to exposure to toxic drugs or environmental agents. Current
therapy for pulmonary fibrosis consists of corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs
such as cyclophosphamide, which, when utilized, are largely ineffective.
In vitro studies have shown that ConXn(TM) inhibits the production of
collagen by stimulated lung fibroblasts by up to 44%. In an animal model to test
the ability of ConXn(TM) to inhibit lung fibrosis in vivo, ConXn(TM)
substantially inhibited the onset of lung fibrosis.
T-Cell Receptor ("TCR") Peptide Development Program
The Company is also developing TCR Peptide vaccines to arrest the
autoimmune disease process by boosting the naturally occurring control arm of
the immune system that functions inefficiently in immune-mediated diseases.
Connective has two TCR vaccine programs in development, one for multiple
sclerosis and one for rheumatoid arthritis.
Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease of the
central nervous system that results from damage to myelin, a substance that
encircles and insulates nerve fibers. Multiple sclerosis can result in impaired
mobility, visual impairment, slurred speech, poor bladder control, sexual
dysfunction and, ultimately, confinement to a wheelchair. Approximately 270,000
persons suffer from multiple sclerosis in the United States. The cost of
treatment in the United States alone is estimated to be $270 million in 1995 and
is expected to grow to $1.7 billion worldwide by 1999. However, none of the
currently available treatments address the underlying cause of the disease.
A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, physician sponsored TCR
vaccine Phase I trial involving 11 patients and a Phase I/II trial involving 23
patients with progressive multiple sclerosis were conducted by an independent
clinical investigator in association with the Company. Results from these trials
suggest that a number of patients achieved the desired immune response to the
vaccine, that the vaccine was well tolerated and that patients who had the
desired immune response experienced a stabilization of disease without side
effects during one year of therapy. Successful peptide vaccination boosted
protective T-cells and lowered pathogenic T-cells thought to cause the disease.
In December 1996, the Company initiated a 100 patient Phase I/II clinical trial
of TCR vaccines for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, and expects results
from this study to be available by the end of 1997.
Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disease in
which the body's immune system attacks synovial tissue in joints, resulting in
progressive, systemic and painful inflammation. In advanced phases of the
disease, symptoms include severe pain, body disfigurement and loss of mobility.
The cause of rheumatoid arthritis is unknown, though
-10-
<PAGE> 11
environmental toxins, certain pathogens and genetic factors have been
implicated. It is estimated that between one and two percent of the worldwide
adult population, including approximately three million individuals in the
United States, suffer from rheumatoid arthritis and about one-half of these will
progress to severe disease. Women are three times more susceptible than men.
Current treatment for rheumatoid arthritis uses a combination of drugs and
physical and occupational therapy in an attempt to prevent further joint damage.
None of these therapies stops progression completely or reverses the damage.
At the tissue level, there is mounting evidence to suggest that T-cells
present at the sites of inflammation cause fibroblast dysfunction that leads to
destruction of the joint capsule. Company investigators have analyzed the
frequency of T-cells with certain types of receptors in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis. Through such studies the Company has identified peptides which mimic
these receptors and which may be useful as therapeutic vaccines. Company
investigators and their collaborators have performed parallel studies in animal
models of arthritis in which disease relevant T cells with specific receptor
configurations have been defined. Therapeutic vaccines based upon the relevant
protein sequences were produced and demonstrated to control the disease process.
Based on these studies the Company intends to initiate in 1997 a pilot clinical
trial of TCR vaccines for rheumatoid arthritis.
Betamethasone mousse program
In June 1996, the Company signed an agreement with Soltec Research PTY
Ltd. which granted Connective an exclusive license to develop and market
betamethasone mousse in North America. The product is being marketed in the
United Kingdom by Evans Medical Ltd., a division of Medera PLC. Betamethasone
mousse is a mousse formulation of betamethasone 17-alpha-valerate, a
corticosteroid currently marketed in the U.S. for the treatment of scalp
psoriasis. The foam formulation has been shown to liquify when applied to the
body, enabling rapid penetration of active dermatologic agent. This formulation
is designed to be easier to apply and less messy than currently marketed scalp
lotions and gels. In addition, the ease of use and patient acceptability may
enhance patient compliance.
Psoriasis. Psoriasis, a chronic, recurrent dermatologic disease
characterized by inflammation and thickening of the skin, is estimated to affect
over 5 million people in the U.S. Scalp psoriasis, a distinct manifestation of
psoriasis, is a serious problem for more than 60 percent of psoriatics. Over 1.2
million patients are in treatment at any time in the United States. Patients
with scalp psoriasis suffer from various degrees of erythema, scaling and
itching associated with the disease, and the disease course typically involves
periods of remission followed by acute exacerbations. In a comparative clinical
trial of betamethasone mousse against placebo in scalp psoriasis patients in the
U.K., patients treated with betamethasone mousse showed statistically
significant improvement in erythema (redness), scaling and plaque. The product
was well tolerated and no adverse systemic effects were noted. In April 1997,
the Company commenced a Phase III clinical trial for betamethasone mousse, which
if successful, could lead to the submission of a New Drug Application for
marketing the product in the United States.
-11-
<PAGE> 12
ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS AND RESEARCH PROGRAM
Connective has established a methodology for identifying and isolating
disease-causing T cells, which the Company may use to develop additional
products based on its TCR technology to treat diseases such as inflammatory
bowel disease, psoriasis and type I diabetes. The TCRs from relevant T cells are
analyzed and the resulting DNA sequence information is used to chemically
synthesize therapeutic vaccine peptides. The Company believes that these TCR
Peptides can be administered to the patient as a disease-specific immune booster
to halt the progress of the autoimmune disease. The Company further believes
that, because TCR Peptides selectively inhibit only certain T cells, side
effects resulting from general, non-specific immunosuppression can be avoided.
The Company is investigating the applicability of ConXn(TM) for other
indications, such as burn scarring, fibrotic adhesions and ophthalmic fibrosis.
Also ongoing are research efforts in the areas of formulation, routes of
administration and assays for research and clinical uses. The Company continues
to explore mechanisms of disease and autoimmune processes and to develop
analogs, derivatives and molecules related to its products and fields of
interest. In this manner, the Company intends to maintain its position as a
leader in the understanding of autoimmune and connective tissue diseases and
treatment of these diseases, as well as develop second generation products and
technology to enhance its product pipeline.
In addition to acquiring Betamethasone mousse, the Company also
received rights to the foam delivery technology which can be used to transform
steroids and other agents into more convenient, patient-friendly systems. The
Company plans to use this technology as a platform from which a pipeline of
innovative therapies could potentially be spawned.
MARKETED PRODUCT
Ridaura(R)
On December 31, 1996, the company acquired the exclusive U.S. and
Canadian rights to Ridaura(R) from SmithKline Beecham Corporation and related
entities ("SmithKline"). Ridaura(R) is an oral formulation of a gold salt
(auranofin). Also classified as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug,
Ridaura(R) has been shown to slow the progression of rheumatoid arthritis and is
believed to slow joint destruction. The drug is currently indicated for adults
with active rheumatoid arthritis who are not responsive to, or are intolerant
of, treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease
that afflicts one to two percent of adult Americans (approximately 3 million
patients), with women three times more susceptible than men. It is characterized
by inflammation of synovial tissues with joint pain, swelling and stiffness.
Although autoimmune arthritis can afflict children and adolescents, the disease
usually strikes adults between the ages of 30 and 40, and the incidences of
clinical illness is greatest among those aged 40 to 60 years. Rheumatoid
arthritis is an extremely disabling disease that carries a high degree of
morbidity.
-12-
<PAGE> 13
Ridaura(R) is currently being distributed by SmithKline on behalf of
the Company. Connective expects to begin marketing Ridaura(R) through its own
sales force by mid-1997. Through agreements with SmithKline, customer orders and
distribution for the product will continue to be managed by SmithKline through
1997 and SmithKline will manufacture and supply Ridaura(R) (in final finished
package form) to the Company for an initial term through December 2001.
Under its agreement with SmithKline, the Company acquired all rights,
title and interest to SmithKline's U.S. and Canadian intellectual property
rights for Ridaura(R), along with related assets such as customer lists,
contracts, product files and unfilled customer orders. Although the patent for
Ridaura(R) has expired, the Company intends to use the other valuable
intellectual property rights and assets acquired to market the product in the
U.S. and Canada.
COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS
The Company's initial products were licensed from Genentech and XOMA.
As part of its business strategy, the Company has entered into and continues to
explore strategic collaborative relationships and consulting agreements with
leading researchers and institutions working in its fields of interest, to
complement its internal research efforts and provide access to technologies that
complement and expand its existing portfolio. The Company is seeking
collaborative agreements with pharmaceutical companies as sources of additional
products and as partners for the development and marketing of existing products.
See "-- Connective Strategy," "-- Marketing and Sales."
Genentech. In September 1993, Genentech and Connective entered into a
license agreement (the "September 1993 Agreement") pursuant to which Connective
obtained exclusive worldwide rights to relaxin (excluding reproductive
indications and the territories of Japan, Korea and the Republic of China),
including rights licensed to Genentech from the Howard Florey Institute of
Experimental Physiology and Medicine in Melbourne, Australia. Connective also
has rights to future developments regarding relaxin. The September 1993
Agreement also includes a worldwide exclusive license to certain TCR Peptide
technologies and a right of first negotiation for gamma interferon's connective
tissue disease indications, which, along with relaxin, had been the subject of
research by one of Connective's founders, Dr. Amento, during his tenure at
Genentech. The Company is obligated to pay royalties on licensed product sales.
In addition, Genentech received an equity position in the Company. The September
1993 Agreement also includes certain technology transfer, supply, and
intellectual property provisions. The Company is responsible for meeting certain
milestones and making payments for supplies provided under the September 1993
Agreement. Failure to timely achieve designated milestones may result in
termination of the agreement by Genentech and a license on a non-exclusive basis
to Genentech of relaxin technology developed by the Company.
In July 1994, Genentech and Connective amended the September 1993
Agreement to clarify the Company's right to sub-license the relaxin technology,
subject to a right of first offer held by Genentech. The Company's rights to
relaxin were expanded to include reproductive indications on a co-exclusive
basis with Genentech. In April 1996, the Company acquired rights to Japan,
Korea and the Republic of China from Genentech, thereby giving the Company
worldwide rights to the technology.
In December 1995, Genentech and Connective entered into an agreement
(the "December 1995 Agreement") with respect to gamma interferon pursuant to
which the Company has acquired exclusive development and marketing rights in the
United States for dermatologic indications. The
-13-
<PAGE> 14
December 1995 Agreement includes supply provisions on the part of Genentech and
obligates the Company to pay for such supply, providing for a profit margin and
an allowance for the Company's expenses in developing and marketing the product.
XOMA. In June 1994, Connective entered into an agreement with XOMA
Corporation (the "XOMA Agreement") pursuant to which the Company acquired
additional TCR Peptide technology and patent rights. The XOMA Agreement
obligates the Company to make certain milestone payments and to pay certain
royalties on sales of TCR Peptide vaccine products. The Company's failure to
meet certain milestones may result in the acquisition by XOMA of a co-exclusive
royalty-free license to the TCR Peptide technology with the right to sublicense.
Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued to XOMA a warrant to purchase
shares of preferred stock which expired upon the closing of the Company's
initial public offering in February 1996.
Arthur A. Vandenbark, Ph.D. (Veterans Administration Medical Center,
Portland, Oregon). In July 1994, the Company entered into a Research
Collaboration and Assignment Agreement with Dr. Vandenbark, the inventor of the
patent rights acquired from XOMA, to establish a framework for a three-year
scientific collaboration relating to the development of the TCR Peptide
vaccines. The agreement provides that the Company pays the Portland Veterans
Affairs Research Foundation in order to fund the collaborative research, gives
the Company access to future inventions and know-how, and obligates the Company
to make certain royalty payments on sales of products not already covered by the
XOMA Agreement. In addition, the Company granted to Dr. Vandenbark options to
purchase the Company's Common Stock, which vest upon the achievement of certain
milestones.
North Shore University Hospital (Peter Gregersen, Ph.D.). In January
1995, the Company entered into a Research and License Agreement with North Shore
University Hospital Research Corporation to establish a collaborative research
program expanding upon an existing consulting relationship with Dr. Peter
Gregersen in the area of T cell receptor analysis and use in the diagnosis and
treatment of disease. The agreement provides funding for collaborative research,
gives the Company access to inventions and know-how, and obligates the Company
to make certain royalty payments on sales of products covered by licensed
patents.
Medical University of South Carolina (Christian Schwabe, Ph.D.). In
April 1995, the Company entered into a Collaborative Research Agreement with the
Medical University of South Carolina to establish a collaborative research
program expanding upon an existing consulting relationship with Dr. Christian
Schwabe in the area of relaxin research, including the biology, receptors,
synthesis and activities of relaxin, the genes encoding relaxin, relaxin
peptides, analogs and related compounds. The agreement provides funding for
collaborative research, gives the Company access to future inventions and
know-how, and obligates the Company to make certain royalty payments on sales of
products covered by licensed patents.
Soltec. In June 1996, the Company entered into an exclusive License
Agreement with Soltec Research PTY Ltd. to develop and market betamethasone
mousse (a foam mousse
-14-
<PAGE> 15
formulation of the dermatologic drug, betamethasone valerate) in North America.
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will pay a licensing fee to
Soltec, plus royalties on future sales of products, if any, arising from the
licensed technology. The Company also has an exclusive option on Soltec's foam
mousse system for the delivery of other compounds.
SmithKline Beecham. In December 1996, the Company entered into an
agreement with SmithKline Beecham under which the Company acquired exclusive
United States and Canadian rights to Ridaura(R), a disease modifying
antirheumatic drug. Ridaura(R) is currently being distributed by SmithKline on
behalf of the Company. Connective expects to begin marketing Ridaura(R) through
its own sales force by mid-1997. Through agreements with SmithKline, customer
orders and distribution for the product will continue to be managed by
SmithKline through 1997 and SmithKline will manufacture and supply Ridaura(R)
(in final finished package form) to the Company for an initial term through
December 2001.
PATENTS AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
The Company's success will depend in part on the ability of Connective
and its licensors to obtain patent protection for the Company's products and
processes, to preserve its trade secrets, and to operate without infringing the
proprietary rights of third parties. The Company owns, controls or has
exclusively licensed pending applications and/or issued patents worldwide
relating to the technology of all three of its major programs as well as
technology in the earlier stages of research.
The Company's gamma interferon patent portfolio includes issued
U.S. patents and other pending applications relating to the composition of
matter, formulations and methods of treatment, which do not begin to expire
until 2009. The Company's relaxin patent portfolio relates to the composition of
matter (proteins and DNA), analogs and closely related compositions,
formulations, methods of manufacture and methods of treatment, including issued
patents in the U.S. with various international equivalents in addition to other
applications that remain pending. The issued relaxin patents will expire at
various times between 2003 and 2012. The Company's TCR Peptide patent portfolio
includes pending applications in the U.S., and a corresponding international
patent and applications, relating to compositions of matter (peptides, peptide
analogs, peptide fragments, and antibodies), formulations, methods of treatment,
diagnostic methods, and methods of preparing/isolating protective T cells. Two
issued international patents (Australia and Israel) expire in 2010, and patents
issuing on the pending U.S. and international applications would expire at
various times beginning in 2010. Extensions may be available for certain key
patents in the U.S. and Europe (subject to statutory changes before product
approval). See "-- Collaborative Relationships."
There has been increasing litigation in the biomedical, biotechnology
and pharmaceutical industries with respect to the manufacture, use and sale of
new therapeutic products that are the subject of conflicting patent rights. The
validity and breadth of claims in biomedical/pharmaceutical/biotechnology
patents involve complex factual and legal issues for which no consistent policy
has emerged, and therefore, are highly uncertain. Moreover, the patent laws of
foreign countries differ from those of the U.S. and the degree of protection, if
any, afforded by foreign patents may, therefore, be different. In Europe, a
third party appeal is
-15-
<PAGE> 16
pending from an opposition to a patent application concerning relaxin DNA; the
original opposition was successfully defended by the Company's licensor. No
assurance can be given that any of the Company's or its licensors' patent
applications will issue as patents or that any such issued patents will provide
competitive advantage to the Company or will not be successfully challenged or
circumvented by its competitors. In addition, others may hold or receive patents
or file patent applications that contain claims having a scope that covers
products or processes made, used or sold by the Company. In the event that any
claims of third-party patents are upheld as valid and enforceable with respect
to a product or process made, used or sold by the Company, the Company could be
prevented from practicing the subject matter claimed in such patents or could be
required to obtain licenses or redesign its products or processes to avoid
infringement and could be liable to pay damages. There can be no assurance that
such licenses would be available or, if available, would be on commercially
reasonable terms, or that the Company would be successful in any attempt to
redesign its products or processes to avoid infringement.
The Company has become aware that third parties have obtained patents
generally relating to TCR Vaccines technology, including a U.S. patent issued to
Immune Response Corporation on March 18, 1997. With regard to such patents as
are known to the Company and its patent counsel, the Company believes such
patents' claims would be found either invalid or not infringed if asserted
against the proposed TCR Vaccines. The Company is also aware of other pending
third party patent applications which, if issued, might be asserted against the
Company's TCR Vaccines and products or processes as planned to be made, used or
sold by the Company. If such patents were successfully asserted, the Company
could be required to obtain licenses or redesign its TCR Vaccines products or
processes to avoid infringement and could be liable to pay damages, or could be
prevented from commercializing TCR Vaccines. There can be no assurance that such
licenses would be available or, if available, would be on commercially
reasonable terms, or that the Company would be successful in any attempt to
redesign its products or processes to avoid infringement. Even if the Company's
patent counsel render advice that the Company's products and processes do not
infringe any valid claim under third party patents relating to the TCR Vaccines
technology, neither they nor the Company can assure that no third party will
commence litigation to enforce such patents, or that the Company will not incur
substantial expenses or that it will prevail in any patent litigation. Moreover,
patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy until issue, and
publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag
behind actual discoveries, so the Company cannot be certain that it is aware of
all potentially relevant pending applications and it is not possible to predict
with any certainty the scope of claims that could issue from such a third
party's pending application. The Company anticipates that an interference will
be declared between one or more of its TCR Peptide technology patent
applications and those of one or more of its competitors including the
above-references patent of Immune Response Corporation to determine priority of
invention, which could result in substantial cost to the Company even if the
eventual outcome is favorable. It is not possible to know in advance the
invention dates that such other parties may be able to prove, so the Company
cannot know whether its or its licensors' inventors are the first for inventions
covered by their pending patent applications or that it or its licensors were
the first to file patent applications for such inventions. A judgment adverse to
the Company in any such patent interference, litigation or other proceeding
could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition
and
-16-
<PAGE> 17
results of operation, and its expense may be substantial whether or not the
Company is successful.
Connective also relies on trade secrets and proprietary know-how. The
Company requires its employees, consultants and advisors to execute a
confidentiality agreement providing that all proprietary information developed
or made known to the individual during the course of the relationship will be
kept confidential and not used or disclosed to third parties except in specified
circumstances. The agreements also provide that all inventions conceived by an
employee (or consultant or advisor to the extent appropriate for the services
provided) during the course of the relationship shall be the exclusive property
of the Company, other than inventions unrelated to the Company and developed
entirely on the individual's own time. There can be no assurance, however, that
these agreements will provide meaningful protection or adequate remedies for
misappropriation of the Company's trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use
or disclosure of such information.
MARKETING AND SALES
The Company's business strategy is based upon the belief that
Connective should retain marketing rights for products in the areas of
rheumatology and dermatology in the United States and Canada. The Company
believes that a large, general sales and marketing infrastructure is not
required to effectively and successfully maximize the commercial potential of
products in the changing health care market, and in particular products directed
toward the treatment of connective tissue disorders. The Company is targeting
its commercial activities at rheumatologists and dermatologists, which can be
served by a focused and specialized marketing organization. The Company intends
to develop a highly trained, high quality, niche oriented commercial
organization to market the Company's in-licensed and internally developed
products. With regard to Ridaura, the Company has a transitional services
agreement with SmithKline ending December 31, 1997 whereby SmithKline is
performing order entry, packaging, shipping, invoicing and credit and
collection services for Ridaura on behalf of the Company. The Company intends
to take over these functions in January 1998 with its own sales and
administrative personnel. On the marketing side, the Company plans to
"relaunch" Ridaura in the second quarter of 1997.
Outside the United States, the Company's strategy is to establish
development, marketing and distribution agreements with pharmaceutical
companies. The Company is engaged in discussions with a number of pharmaceutical
companies regarding marketing and sales alliances for both ConXn(TM) and its TCR
Peptide products for the European and Asian markets.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had no employees devoted to
marketing and sales. In connection with its acquisition of U.S. and Canadian
rights to Ridaura, the Company intends to hire persons for its marketing and
sales functions and had hired three such employees as of March 31, 1997.
MANUFACTURING
The Company contracts with independent sources to manufacture its
products, which enables the Company to focus on its product and clinical
development strengths, minimize fixed costs and capital expenditures, and gain
access to advanced manufacturing process capabilities. Gamma interferon is
manufactured by Genentech in an FDA-licensed manufacturing facility. ConXn(TM)
is manufactured for Connective under contract with four outside vendors: BASF
Bioresearch Corp. for fermentation, Scios Nova, Inc. for purification,
Chesapeake Biological Laboratory for filling and Tektagen, Inc. for testing. The
Company is in discussions with additional manufacturers who can supply ConXn(TM)
and TCR Peptides for clinical and commercial uses. Ridaura is manufactured by
SmithKline Beecham (in final finished package form) under an agreement with an
initial term through December 2001. Betamathasone mousse is manufactured for
Connective by CCL Pharmaceuticals.
-17-
<PAGE> 18
The Company's strategy is to continue to use manufacturing agreements
for the production of its current and future products.
COMPETITION
The biopharmaceutical industry is highly competitive. The Company
believes that there are numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and
academic research groups throughout the world engaged in research and
development efforts with respect to therapeutic products targeted at diseases or
conditions addressed by the Company. There can be no assurance that such other
companies and research institutions will not complete the development and
regulatory approval process sooner and, therefore, market their products earlier
than the Company. Many of these institutions have substantially greater
financial, marketing and human resources and development capabilities than
Connective. Technological developments by competitors, earlier regulatory
approval for marketing competitive products or superior marketing capabilities
possessed by competitors could adversely affect the commercial potential of the
Company's products. In particular, with respect to the TCR Peptides, the Company
is aware that other companies and research institutions are engaged in research
and development efforts and are in various stages of clinical trials with
respect to rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases.
Connective believes that competitive factors in its industry include
scientific and technological expertise, managerial competence in identifying and
pursuing product in-licensing and acquisition opportunities, operational
competence in developing, protecting, manufacturing and marketing products and
obtaining timely regulatory agency approvals, and financial resources. The
Company intends to compete on the basis of the quality and exclusivity of its
products, combined with the effectiveness of its marketing and sales efforts.
Competing successfully will depend on the Company's continued ability to attract
and retain skilled and experienced personnel, to develop and secure the rights
to pharmaceutical products and compounds and to exploit these products and
compounds commercially prior to the development of competitive products by
others. The Company expects that there will be continued competition for highly
qualified scientific, technical and managerial personnel.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
FDA Regulation and Product Approval. Regulation by governmental
entities in the United States and other countries will be a significant factor
in the production and marketing of any pharmaceutical products which are or may
be developed by the Company. It is expected that all of the Company's
pharmaceutical products will require regulatory approval by governmental
agencies prior to commercialization. In particular, human pharmaceutical
therapeutic products are subject to rigorous preclinical and clinical testing
and other approval procedures by the FDA in the United States and similar health
authorities in foreign countries. Various federal and, in some cases, state
statutes and regulations also govern or influence the manufacturing, safety,
labeling, storage, record keeping and marketing of such pharmaceutical products.
The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with
appropriate federal and foreign statutes and regulations are time-consuming and
require the expenditure of substantial resources.
-18-
<PAGE> 19
Generally, in order to obtain FDA approval for a new therapeutic agent,
a company first must conduct preclinical studies in the laboratory and in animal
model systems to gain preliminary information on the agent's efficacy and to
identify any safety problems. "Preclinical" studies include toxicity,
pharmacokinetic and efficacy testing in vitro and in animals and chemical or
biological formulation work in preparation for submission of the necessary data
to comply with applicable regulations prior to the commencement of human
testing. The results of these studies are submitted as a part of an
investigational new drug application ("IND"), which the FDA must review before
human clinical trials of an investigational drug can start. The Company has
filed and will continue to be required to sponsor and file INDs and will be
responsible for initiating and overseeing the clinical studies to demonstrate
the safety and efficacy that are necessary to obtain FDA approval of its
products. Clinical trials are normally done in three phases and generally take
two to five years, but may take longer, to complete. "Phase I trials" generally
involve administration of a product to a small number of persons to determine
safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetic characteristics. "Phase I/II trials"
generally involve administration of a product to a small number of persons who
have the targeted disease to determine safety, tolerance and pharmacokinetic
characteristics and/or to obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy. "Phase II
trials" generally involve administration of a product to a limited number of
patients with a particular disease to determine dosage, efficacy and safety.
"Phase III trials" generally examine the clinical efficacy and safety in an
expanded patient population at multiple clinical sites. At least one such trial
is required for FDA approval to market a drug.
After completion of clinical trials of a product, the Company will be
required to file a new drug application ("NDA"), if the product is classified as
a new drug, or a product license application ("PLA"), if the product is
classified as a biologic, and receive FDA approval before commercial marketing
of the drug. The testing and approval processes require substantial time and
effort and there can be no assurance that any approval will be granted on a
timely basis, if at all. While the Company will endeavor to secure expedited
review and approval when possible, NDAs can take, on average, two to five years
to receive approval by the FDA. While recent legislative and regulatory
initiatives have focused on the need to reduce FDA review and approval times,
the ultimate impact of such initiatives on the Company's products cannot be
certain. If questions arise during the FDA review process, approval can take
more than five years. Even if FDA regulatory clearances are obtained, a marketed
product is subject to continual review, and later discovery of previously
unknown problems or failure to comply with the applicable regulatory
requirements may result in restrictions on the marketing of a product or
withdrawal of the product from the market as well as possible civil or criminal
sanctions. For marketing outside the United States, the Company will also be
subject to foreign regulatory requirements governing human clinical trials and
marketing approval for pharmaceutical products. The requirements governing the
conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary
widely from country to country.
Third Party Reimbursement and Health Care Reform. The commercial
success of the Company's products under development will be substantially
dependent upon the availability of government or private third-party
reimbursement for the use of such products. There can be no assurance that
Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations and other third-party
payers will authorize or otherwise budget such reimbursement. Such governmental
and third party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for
medical products and services. If the Company
-19-
<PAGE> 20
succeeds in bringing one or more of its development products to market, there
can be no assurance that such products will be viewed as cost-effective or that
reimbursement will be available to consumers or will be sufficient to allow the
Company's products to be marketed on a competitive basis. Furthermore, federal
and state regulations govern or influence the reimbursement to health care
providers of fees and capital equipment costs in connection with medical
treatment of certain patients. In response to concerns about the rising costs of
advanced medical technologies, the current administration of the federal
government has publicly stated its desire to reform health care, including the
possibility of price controls and revised reimbursement policies. There can be
no assurance that actions taken by the administration, if any, with regard to
health care reform will not have a material adverse effect on the Company. If
any actions are taken by the administration, such actions could adversely affect
the prospects for future sales of the Company's products. Further, to the extent
that these or other proposals or reforms have a material adverse effect on the
Company's ability to secure funding for its development or on the business,
financial condition and profitability of other companies that are prospective
collaborators for certain of the Company's product candidates, the Company's
ability to develop or commercialize its product candidates may be adversely
affected.
Given recent government initiatives directed at lowering the total cost
of health care throughout the United States, it is likely that the United States
Congress and state legislatures will continue to focus on health care reform and
the cost of prescription pharmaceuticals as well as on the reform of the
Medicare and Medicaid systems. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of
passage of federal and state legislation related to health care reform or
lowering pharmaceutical costs. In certain foreign markets pricing of
prescription pharmaceuticals is already subject to government control. Continued
significant changes in the U.S. or foreign health care systems could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business.
Environmental Regulation. The Company's research and development
activities involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals and
various radioactive materials. The Company is subject to federal, state and
local laws and regulations governing the use, storage, handling and disposal of
such materials and certain waste products. Although the Company believes that
its safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials comply with
the standards prescribed by state, federal, and local laws and regulations, the
risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be
completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident, the Company could be
held liable for any damages that result and any liability could exceed the
resources of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will not be
required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and
regulations as its research activities are increased or that the operations,
business and future profitability of the Company will not be adversely affected
by current or future environmental laws and regulations.
SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD AND OTHER ADVISORS
Connective utilizes various advisors to provide expertise and critical
review of its programs. For advice on and review of its current and long-term
scientific planning, research and development, the Company has established a
Scientific Advisory Board ("SAB") consisting of distinguished scientists and
clinicians with expertise in biologic processes and diseases that involve
-20-
<PAGE> 21
the connective tissues of the body. All of the individuals on the SAB are
recognized as leading authorities in their fields.
SAB members consult with and meet informally with management and key
scientific employees of the Company on a frequent basis. The members of the SAB
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME POSITION
- ---- --------
<S> <C>
Edward P. Amento, M.D.............. Consultant, Molecular Medicine Research, Inc.
Eugene Bauer, M.D.................. Dean, Stanford University School of Medicine
Yueh-Hsiu Chien, Ph.D.............. Assistant Professor, Stanford University School of Medicine
Arthur Eisen, M.D.................. Professor, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Hospital
Philip Hanawalt, M.D............... Professor of Biological Sciences and Dermatology, Stanford University and
Stanford University School of Medicine
Gerald Nepom, M.D., Ph.D........... Director, Virginia Mason Research Center, Professor, University of
Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
Brian Seed, Ph.D................... Professor, Harvard Medical School (Massachusetts General Hospital)
</TABLE>
Each member of the SAB has entered into an agreement with the Company
covering the terms of his position as a member of the SAB. Each member provides
services on an as-needed basis. Four members of the SAB have entered into
separate agreements with the Company covering additional consultation above and
beyond their activities as SAB members. Certain SAB members hold options to
purchase or have purchased Common Stock of the Company. In addition, members of
the SAB receive a fee of $1,000 for attending each SAB meeting and are
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending each meeting. All
members of the SAB are employed by institutions other than the Company and may
have commitments to, or consulting or advisory agreements with, other entities
that may limit their availability to the Company.
For its preclinical and clinical development programs the Company has
established relationships with several contract research organizations and
practicing physicians.
EMPLOYEES
The Company had 42 full-time employees at December 31, 1996, of which
27 are engaged in, or directly support, the Company's research and development
activities. The Company also uses outside consultants. The Company considers
relations with its employees to be good. None of the Company's employees is
covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
ADDITIONAL FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
The Company desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Specifically, the
Company wishes to alert investors and other readers that the following important
factors, as well as other factors, could in the future affect, and in the past
have affected, the Company's actual results and could cause the Company's
results for future years or quarters to differ materially from those expressed
in any forward looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.
-21-
<PAGE> 22
UNCERTAINTY OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND MARKET ACCEPTANCE
Since its inception and through its acquisition of Ridaura(R) in
December 1996, Connective has been a development stage company. Except for
Ridaura(R), all of the Company's products are in clinical or preclinical
development, and no revenues had been generated from products until December
1996, when the Company recognized $428,000 in December product revenues from
Ridaura(R). To date, the Company's resources have been primarily dedicated to
the research and development of products that the Company has in-licensed from
Genentech and others. Although the Company believes it has the expertise to
develop and commercialize such products, any or all of the Company's products
may fail to be effective or prove to have undesirable and unintended side
effects or other characteristics that may prevent their development or
regulatory approval, or limit their commercial use. There can be no assurance
that the Company, or its collaborative partners, will be permitted to undertake
human clinical trials for any of their development products not currently in
clinical trials or, if permitted, that such products will be demonstrated to be
safe and effective. In addition, there can be no assurance that any of the
Company's products under development will obtain approval from the FDA or
equivalent foreign authorities for any indication or that an approved compound
will be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at reasonable costs
and successfully marketed. Products, if any, resulting from the Company's
research and development programs are not expected to be commercially available
for several years. Even if such products become commercially available, there
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to gain satisfactory market
acceptance for such products.
MANAGEMENT OF RIDAURA(R) ACQUISITION; UNCERTAINTY OF FUTURE RIDAURA(R) REVENUES
The Company's success will depend in part on its ability to manage its
recent acquisition of the exclusive U.S. and Canadian rights to Ridaura(R).
Although SmithKline is continuing to manage certain sales and distribution
operations through 1997, the Company will be required to recruit a substantial
number of qualified employees to market, sell and distribute Ridaura(R). If the
Company is unable to hire a sufficient number of employees with the appropriate
levels of experience to build these departments, or if the Company is unable to
effectively manage the integration of its rights to Ridaura(R) into the
Company's product line, the Company's business, financial condition and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, while the
Company believes in the potential of Ridaura(R), there can be no assurance that
the Company's Ridaura(R) revenues will equal or exceed those achieved by
SmithKline over the last several years. If the Company is not able to market and
sell Ridaura(R) successfully, the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore,
the patent for Ridaura(R) has expired; therefore, the Company will be unable to
assert patent infringement claims against a third party marketing the same
product under a different trade name, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY; HISTORY OF LOSSES; UNCERTAINTY OF FUTURE
PROFITABILITY
Due to its limited operating history, the Company is subject to the
uncertainties and risks associated with any new business. Having no
commercialized products until the recent Ridaura(R) acquisition, the Company has
experienced operating losses every year since its incorporation. Net losses for
the fiscal years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 were $18.5 million and $10.4
million, respectively, and the Company had an accumulated deficit of $37.8
million at December 31, 1996. The Company expects to incur increasing operating
losses for at least the next several years. The amount of net losses and the
time required by the Company to reach profitability are
-22-
<PAGE> 23
uncertain. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever be able to
generate revenue from its products now under development or achieve
profitability on a sustained basis.
POTENTIAL FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS
The Company had no revenues from products from its inception until
December 1996, when it recognized $428,000 in December product revenues from
Ridaura(R). There can be no assurance that growth in Ridaura(R) revenues will be
achieved or that the Company will ever be profitable on a quarterly or annual
basis in the future. As noted above, the Company expects to incur quarterly and
annual operating losses for at least the next several years. The Company's
quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future
depending on such factors as the timing and shipment of significant Ridaura(R)
orders, if any, changes in pricing policies by the Company and its competitors,
the timing and market acceptance of any new products introduced by the Company,
the mix of distribution channels through which Ridaura(R) and other products (if
any) are sold, and the Company's inability to obtain sufficient supplies for its
products. In response to competitive pressures or new product introductions, the
Company may take certain pricing or other actions that could materially and
adversely affect the Company's operating results.
FUTURE CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND UNCERTAINTY OF FUTURE FUNDING; DILUTIVE AND
OTHER EFFECTS OF EQUITY LINE ARRANGEMENT
The Company expects that its current cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments, will be sufficient to fund the Company's operations
through 1997. In addition, the development of the Company's products will
require the commitment of substantial resources to conduct the time-consuming
research and development, clinical studies and regulatory activities necessary
to bring any potential medical product to market and to establish production,
marketing and sales capabilities. The Company may need to raise substantial
additional funds for these purposes. The Company may seek such additional
funding through collaborative arrangements and through public or private
financings, including equity financings. Any additional equity financing, if
available, may be dilutive to stockholders and any debt financing, if available,
may restrict the Company's ability to pay dividends on its capital stock or the
manner in which the Company conducts its business. The Company has secured an
equity line that allows the Company to raise up to $25 million from a certain
institutional investor over a three-year period beginning on or before December
1, 1997. Other than this equity line, however, the Company currently has no
commitments for any additional financings and there can be no assurance that any
such financings will be available to the Company or that adequate funds for the
Company's operations, whether from financial markets, collaborative or other
arrangements with corporate partners or from other sources, will be available
when needed or on terms attractive to the Company. The inability to obtain
sufficient funds may require the Company to delay, scale back or eliminate some
or all of its research and product development programs, to limit the marketing
of its products or to license third parties the rights to commercialize products
or technologies that the Company would otherwise seek to develop and market
itself.
While the equity line arrangement discussed above will help provide
the Company with additional future financing, the sale of shares thereunder
will have a dilutive impact on other stockholders of the Company. As a result,
the Company net income (loss) per share could be materially decreased
(increased) in future periods, and the market price of the Company's Common
Stock could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, the shares to be
issued under the equity line will be issued at a discount (of up to 15%) to the
Company's then-prevailing market price. These discounted sales could have an
immediate adverse effect on the market price of the Company's Common Stock. The
Company also has an obligation to register the shares to be issued under the
equity line before the start of the commitment period; therefore, the shares
sold under the equity line will generally be eligible for immediate resale,
which could further adversely affect the Company's stock price. Finally, the
equity line arrangement will not be available to the Company if its trading
price falls below $7.00 per share, which could require the Company to seek
funds from other sources (with the attendant risk factors set forth in the
preceding paragraph).
As a commitment fee to the equity line investor, the Company has issued
a five-year warrant exercisable for 250,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $8.25 per share (the "Warrant"). On each of the first,
second, and third anniversaries of the beginning of the equity line commitment
period, the Company will issue the equity line investor an additional five-year
warrant exercisable for a number of shares based on the amount of the equity
line unused by the Company in the preceding year (up to a maximum of 25,000
warrant shares if the Company has not drawn any amount under the equity line in
the year and decreasing to zero to the extent the Company has drawn down up to
$8.33 million in the year). The Company is obligated to file a registration
statement covering the resale of the share issuable upon the exercise of such
additional warrants. The issuance and exercise of any such additional warrants
would have a dilutive effect on the Company's stockholders and could have an
adverse effect on the Company's stock price, as could the resale of the shares
acquired thereunder.
-23-
<PAGE> 24
POSSIBLE FUTURE PRODUCT ACQUISITIONS
A significant part of the Company's overall strategy is to in-license
or acquire additional marketed or late stage development products in its
targeted therapeutic areas. The 1996 acquisitions of rights to Betamethasone
mousse and Ridaura(R) reflect this strategy. Future product acquisitions, if
any, may require substantial additional funds (i) for the initial acquisition of
rights to these products and (ii) for the steps necessary to obtain FDA approval
for the product and to market, sell and distribute the product successfully. A
portion of the funds needed to acquire, develop and market any new products may
come from the Company's existing cash and short-term investments; in such case,
fewer resources will be available to the Company's current products and clinical
programs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial conditions and results of operations. Alternatively, the Company may
seek to raise substantial additional funds for new product acquisitions. As
discussed above under "Future Capital Requirements and Uncertainty of Future
Funding," the Company may seek such additional funding through collaborative
arrangements and through public or private financings, including equity
financings. Any additional equity financing, if available, may be dilutive to
stockholders and any debt financing, if available, may restrict the Company's
ability to pay dividends on its capital stock or the manner in which the Company
conducts its business. In addition, any acquisition of rights to additional
products that are not presently approved by the FDA will require the commitment
of substantial resources to conduct the research and development, clinical
studies and regulatory activities necessary to bring such potential product to
market. In addition, if the newly-acquired product is already approved for sale,
the Company will likely be assuming the marketing, sale and distribution of such
product, which may require the Company to recruit a substantial number of
qualified employees to perform these functions. If the Company is unable to hire
a sufficient number of employees with the appropriate levels of experience, or
if the Company is unable to effectively manage the integration of any
newly-acquired products into the Company's product line, the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. Finally, any newly-acquired products may not achieve the marketing or
therapeutic success expected of it by the Company, industry analysts or others
at the time of acquisition.
UNPREDICTABILITY OF, AND LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN, CONDUCTING PRECLINICAL AND
CLINICAL TRIALS
Although the Company's officers and employees have significant prior
experience in conducting clinical trials, the Company itself has completed only
one clinical trial to date, a Phase I/II clinical trial of ConXn(TM) for
scleroderma. In 1996, the Company commenced a Phase III clinical trial of gamma
interferon for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a Phase II clinical trial of
gamma interferon for the treatment of keloids, a Phase II clinical trial of
ConXn(TM) for the treatment of scleroderma, and a Phase I/II clinical trial of
TCR Vaccines for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. In addition, the Company
plans to initiate in 1997 a Phase III comparison trial of Betamethasone mousse
for the treatment of scalp psoriasis and a pilot study of TCR Vaccines for
rheumatoid arthritis. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
successfully complete its ongoing clinical trials or commence the trial or the
study currently planned for 1997. In addition, there can be no assurance that
the Company will meet its development schedule for any of its products in
development. If the Company were unable to commence clinical trials as
-24-
<PAGE> 25
planned, complete the clinical trials or demonstrate the safety and efficacy of
its products, the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations would be materially and adversely affected. There can be no assurance
that if a product from the Company's research and development programs or any
other therapeutic product is successfully developed according to plans, it will
be approved by the FDA on a timely basis or at all.
In addition, because the Company will, in a number of cases, rely on
its contractual rights to access data collected by others in phases of its
clinical trials, the Company is dependent on the continued satisfaction by such
parties' of their contractual obligations to provide such access and cooperate
with the Company in the execution of successful filings with the FDA. There can
be no assurance that the FDA will permit such reliance. If the Company were
unable to rely on clinical data collected by others, the Company may be required
to repeat clinical trials, which could significantly delay commercialization,
and require significantly greater capital.
Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any of
its products under development, the Company must demonstrate through preclinical
studies and clinical trials that the product is safe and efficacious for use in
the target indication for which approval is sought. The results from preclinical
studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of results that will be
obtained in later-stage testing and there can be no assurance that the Company's
future clinical trials will demonstrate the safety and efficacy of any products
or will result in approval to market products. A number of companies in the
biotechnology industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical
trials, even after promising results in earlier trials.
The rate of completion of the Company's clinical trials is dependent
upon, among other factors, the rate of patient enrollment. Patient enrollment is
a function of many factors, including the size of the patient population, the
nature of the protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites and the
eligibility criteria for the study. Delays in planned patient enrollment may
result in increased costs and delays, which could have a material adverse effect
on the Company.
UNCERTAINTIES OF REGULATORY APPROVAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The production and marketing of the Company's products and its ongoing
research and development activities are subject to regulation by numerous
governmental authorities in the United States and other countries. Prior to
marketing, any drug developed by the Company must undertake rigorous preclinical
and clinical testing and an extensive regulatory approval process mandated by
the FDA and equivalent foreign authorities. These processes can take a number of
years and require the expenditure of substantial resources. The Company is also
subject to regulations under the food and drug statutes and regulations of the
State of California.
Obtaining such approvals and completing such testing is a costly and
time-consuming process and approval may not be ultimately obtained. The length
of the FDA review period varies considerably as does the amount of preclinical
and clinical data required to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a specific
product. The Company may also decide to replace the compounds in testing with
modified or optimized compounds, thus extending the testing process. In
addition, delays or rejections may be encountered based upon changes in FDA
policy during the period of product development and FDA regulatory review of
each submitted new drug application or
-25-
<PAGE> 26
product license application. Similar delays may also be encountered in other
countries. There can be no assurance that even after such time and expenditures,
regulatory approval will be obtained for any products developed by the Company.
If regulatory approval of a product is granted, such approval may entail
limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed.
Further, even if such regulatory approval is obtained, the FDA will require
post-marketing reporting and may require surveillance programs to monitor the
usage or side effects of each drug product. A marketed product, its manufacturer
and its manufacturing facilities are subject to continual review and periodic
inspections, and later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product,
manufacturer or facility may result in restrictions on such product or
manufacturer, potentially including withdrawal of the product from the market.
Government regulation in the United States or in foreign countries may
delay marketing of the Company's potential products for years, may impose costly
procedures upon the Company and may furnish a competitive advantage to larger
companies that may compete with the Company. There can be no assurance that FDA
or other regulatory approval for any products developed by the Company will be
granted on a timely basis or at all. A delay in obtaining or a failure to obtain
such approvals would adversely affect the marketing of any potential products
developed by the Company and the Company's liquidity and capital resources. The
FDA regulatory process is currently under substantial review by the current
presidential administration and the U.S. Congress, and as a result, government
regulation may become more or less restrictive in the future.
DEPENDENCE ON CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS
The Company currently has no manufacturing facilities for clinical or
commercial production of any of its products, nor does the Company intend to
develop such capabilities in the near future. The Company's products for
research and preclinical testing have been supplied by collaborators and
contract manufacturing companies. Gamma interferon is manufactured by Genentech
in an FDA-licensed manufacturing facility. ConXn(TM) is manufactured for
Connective under contract with four outside vendors: BASF Bioresearch Corp. for
fermentation, Scios, Inc. for purification, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory for
filling and Tektagen, Inc. for testing. The Company is in discussions with
manufacturers who can supply ConXn(TM) and TCR Vaccines for clinical and
commercial uses. Ridaura(R) is manufactured by SmithKline (in final finished
package form) under an agreement with an initial term through December 2001.
Betamethasone mousse is manufactured for Connective by CCL Pharmaceuticals. If
the Company is unable to contract for manufacturing capabilities on acceptable
terms, the Company's ability to conduct preclinical and human clinical testing
will be adversely affected, resulting in the delay of submission of products for
regulatory approval and initiation of new development programs, which in turn
could impair materially the Company's competitive position and the possibility
of the Company achieving profitability. In addition, some materials used in the
Company's products may be available only from sole suppliers. Although neither
the Company nor its contract manufacturers has experienced difficulty acquiring
materials for the manufacture of its products for clinical trials, no assurance
can be given that interruptions in supplies will not occur in the future, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to manufacture its
products. There can also be no assurance that the Company will be able to
manufacture any of its products on a commercial scale or at a competitive cost
or in sufficient quantities. The Company currently is seeking additional
-26-
<PAGE> 27
clinical and commercial suppliers. There is no assurance that such suppliers
will be located or that the current manufacturers of ConXn(TM) can supply
sufficient clinical quantities. Failure to obtain sufficient clinical or
commercial quantities of ConXn(TM) or other products at acceptable terms would
have a material adverse impact on the Company's attempts to complete its
clinical trials, and obtain approval for and commercialize its products.
COMPETITION AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
Other products and therapies currently exist on the market or are under
development that could compete directly with some of the products that the
Company is seeking to develop and market. There can be no assurance that the
Company's products, even if successfully tested and developed, will be adopted
by physicians over such other products, or that the Company's products will
offer an economically feasible alternative to existing modes of therapy where
they exist. In addition, a number of companies are currently seeking to develop
new products and therapies to address diseases involving connective tissue, the
number of the Company's competitors in these markets could increase. The Company
intends to compete on the basis of the effectiveness, quality and exclusivity of
its products, combined with the effectiveness of its marketing and sales
efforts. There can be no assurance that other products and therapies will not be
developed that will either render the Company's proposed products obsolete or
will have advantages outweighing those of the products and therapies that the
Company is seeking to develop.
Many of the Company's existing or potential competitors, particularly
large pharmaceutical companies, have substantially greater financial, technical
and human resources than the Company. In addition, many of these competitors
have more collective experience than the Company in undertaking preclinical
testing and human clinical trials of new pharmaceutical products and obtaining
regulatory approvals for therapeutic products. Accordingly, the Company's
competitors may succeed in obtaining FDA approval for products more rapidly than
the Company.
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF GUARANTEE OF VALUE OF SHARES ISSUED TO SMITHKLINE
In connection with its acquisition of U.S. and Canadian rights to
Ridaura in December 1996, the Company issued 637,733 shares of Common Stock to
SmithKline Beecham Properties, Inc. ("SBP"). The total value of the shares
issued to SBP is required to be $9.0 million on December 31, 1997; to achieve
such value, the Company may be obligated to issue additional shares to SBP on
such date, or may repurchase a portion of the originally-issued shares to
reduce the market value of the remaining shares to $9.0 million. In the event
the Company is required to issue a substantial number of additional shares to
SBP, such issuance will have a dilutive impact on the other stockholders of the
Company. As a result, the Company net income (loss) per share could be
materially decreased (increased) in future periods, and the market price of the
Company's Common Stock could be materially and adversely affected. In addition,
SBP currently owns approximately 7.0% of the Company's outstanding shares of
Common Stock. An additional issuance of a number of shares to SBP would
increase SBP's ownership percentage and give SBP increased influence in matters
requiring a stockholder vote, such as electing directors or approving a merger
or sale of the Company.
Under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, in the event that a second
issuance to SBP would result in SBP receiving more than 19.9% of more of the
Company's outstanding Common Stock as of December 30, 1996, the Company would
be required to obtain approval of the Company's stockholders for the overall
issuance of shares to SBP. If such approval is not obtained by the Company, SBP
has the right to receive the cash value of the required second issuance. Such a
cash payment would divert the Company's available liquid resources away from
the Company's operations and development programs, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business and its results of operations.
PRODUCT LIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY OF INSURANCE
The Company faces an inherent business risk of exposure to product
liability claims in the event that the use of its technology or potential
products is alleged to have resulted in adverse effects. Such claims, even if
successfully defended by the Company, could injure the Company's reputation.
While the Company has taken, and intends to continue to take, what it believes
are appropriate precautions to minimize exposure to product liability claims,
there can be no assurance that it will avoid liability. The Company believes
that it possesses product liability and general liability and certain other
types of insurance customarily obtained by business organizations of its type.
The Company intends to maintain insurance against product liability risks
associated with the testing, manufacturing and marketing of its products.
However, there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain such insurance
in the future, or that if obtained, such insurance will be sufficient.
Consequently, a product liability claim or other claims with respect to
uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities could have a material
adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.
-27-
<PAGE> 28
ABSENCE OF SALES AND MARKETING EXPERIENCE
Although the Company's officers and employees have significant previous
experience in the industry, the Company itself has no history or experience in
sales, marketing or distribution. As the Company begins to sell Ridaura(R) and
if it obtains government approval to commence commercial sales of any other
products, the Company will be competing with established pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies with respect to marketing capabilities, an area in which
the Company has no history. To market its products directly (in particular,
Ridaura(R)), the Company must either establish a marketing and sales force with
technical expertise and distribution capability or obtain the assistance of a
pharmaceutical company with a large distribution system and sales force. There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to establish sales and
distribution capabilities or be successful in gaining market acceptance for its
products. If the Company enters into co-promotion or other licensing
arrangements, the Company's revenues will be subject to the payment provisions
of such arrangements and dependent on the efforts of third parties, and there
can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.
DEPENDENCE ON AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL KEY PERSONNEL
The Company is dependent on the principal members of its scientific and
management staffs (including Thomas G. Wiggans, its President and Chief
Executive Officer), the loss of whose services might impede the achievement of
development objectives. The Company does not maintain "key person" insurance on
any of these individuals. In addition, the Company's potentially rapid growth
and expansion into areas and activities requiring additional expertise, such as
clinical trials, governmental approvals, manufacturing, sales and marketing,
will increase burdens on the Company's management, operational and financial
resources. These demands are expected to require an increase in management and
scientific personnel and the development of additional expertise by existing
management personnel. Recruiting and retaining management, operational personnel
and qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development work in
the future will be critical to the Company's success. Although the Company
believes it will continue to be successful in attracting and retaining skilled
and experienced management and operational and scientific personnel, there can
be no assurance that the Company will be able to attract and retain such
personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel among
numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities and other
institutions.
UNCERTAINTY OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRICING AND REIMBURSEMENT; HEALTH CARE REFORM AND
RELATED MATTERS
The levels of revenues and profitability of pharmaceutical companies
may be affected by the continuing efforts of governmental and third party payers
to contain or reduce the costs of health care through various means. In both the
United States and elsewhere, sales of prescription pharmaceuticals are dependent
in part on the availability of reimbursement to the consumer from third party
payers, such as government, employers and private insurance plans. Third party
payers are increasingly seeking to reduce the costs of medical products and
services and looking for improved cost/benefit relationships from the products
and services they buy. If the Company or one of its potential marketing or
strategic alliance partners succeeds in bringing one or more products based upon
the Company's technology to the market, there can be no assurance of market
-28-
<PAGE> 29
acceptance of the Company's products or that these products will be considered
cost-effective and that reimbursement to the consumer will be available or will
be sufficient to allow the Company or its partner to sell such products on a
competitive basis. Any inability of the Company or its potential partners to
sell products developed using the Company's technology or in-licensed by the
Company on a competitive basis would have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business.
ENVIRONMENT AND CONTROLLED USE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
The Company is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the use, generation, manufacture, storage, discharge, handling and
disposal of certain materials and wastes used in its operations, some of which
are classified as "hazardous." There can be no assurance that the Company will
not be required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental laws and
regulations as its research activities are increased or that the operations,
business and future profitability of the Company will not be adversely affected
by current or future environmental laws and regulations. Although the Company
believes that its safety procedures for handling and disposing materials comply
with such laws and regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury
from these materials cannot be eliminated. In the event of such an accident, the
Company could be held liable for any damages that result and any such liability
could exceed the resources of the Company.
SIGNIFICANT CONTROL BY EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS
Officers and directors of the Company, together with entities
affiliated with them, beneficially own approximately 37% of the Common Stock of
the Company. These stockholders currently are able to exercise significant
influence over the election of members of the Company's Board of Directors and
therefore to influence all corporate actions.
EFFECT OF CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS
The Company's Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to
5,000,000 shares of undesignated Preferred Stock, of which 200 shares have been
designated as Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, and to determine
the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such shares without
further vote or action by the Company's stockholders. The rights of the holders
of Common Stock will be subject to, and may be adversely effected by, the rights
of the holders of any Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The
issuance of Preferred Stock could have the effect of making it more difficult
for third parties to acquire a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the
Company. In addition, certain provisions of the Company's charter documents,
including a provision eliminating the ability of stockholders to take actions by
written consent, and of Delaware law could delay or make difficult a merger,
tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company. Further, the Company's
stock option and purchase plans generally provide for the assumption of such
plans or substitution of an equivalent option of a successor corporation or,
alternatively, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, exercise of some or
all of the option stock, including non-vested shares, or acceleration of vesting
of shares issued pursuant to stock grants, upon a change of control or similar
event. The Company has entered into agreements with its directors and executive
officers to accelerate the vesting of stock options upon a change of control or
similar event.
-29-
<PAGE> 30
POSSIBLE VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE; LACK OF DIVIDENDS
Prior to February 1996 there was no public market for the Common Stock
of the Company. There can be no assurance that an active trading market will
continue to be sustained or that the market price of the Common Stock will not
decline below the its present market price. The market prices for securities of
biotechnology companies have been highly volatile. Announcements regarding the
results of regulatory approval filings, clinical studies or other testing,
technological innovations or new commercial products by the Company or its
competitors, government regulations, developments concerning proprietary rights
or public concern as to safety of technology have historically had, and are
expected to continue to have, a significant impact on the market prices of the
stocks of biotechnology companies. The trading price of the Common Stock could
also be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in
operating results. In addition, the Company has never paid cash dividends on its
capital stock and does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable
future, but instead intends to retain future earnings, if any, for reinvestment
in its business. The Company's credit agreement requires the approval of the
Company's bank to declare or pay cash dividends.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Connective currently leases approximately 23,500 square feet of
laboratory and office space at 3400 West Bayshore Road in Palo Alto, California.
The Company leases this space under a master lease agreement that expires in
July 1999 with a renewal option that, if exercised, would extend the term of the
lease to the year 2001. The Company currently pays base monthly rent of $45,825
for this space and has the right to use this space for laboratory research and
development, storage and distribution, offices, marketing and other related
uses. The Company expects to outgrow its existing facilities requirements in the
near term and is in the process of searching for additional space on
commercially reasonable terms.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Connective knows of no material litigation or proceeding pending or
threatened to which the Company is, or may become, a party.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The executive officers of the Company, and their ages as of December
31, 1996, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Thomas G. Wiggans........................... 45 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
</TABLE>
-30-
<PAGE> 31
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
W. Scott Harkonen, M.D...................... 45 Sr. Vice President, Product Development and Operations
Cynthia M. Butitta.......................... 42 Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer
Richard J. Hammel, Ph.D..................... 53 Vice President, Commercial Development
David A. Lowin, Esq......................... 42 Vice President, Intellectual Property, Chief Patent
Counsel and Assistant Secretary
Ernst H. Rinderknecht, Ph.D................. 49 Vice President, Process Science and Manufacturing
</TABLE>
Thomas G. Wiggans has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and
as a director of the Company since July 1994. From February 1992 to April 1994,
Mr. Wiggans served as President and Chief Operating Officer of CytoTherapeutics,
a biotechnology company. From 1980 to February 1992, Mr. Wiggans served at
various positions at Ares-Serono Group, a pharmaceutical company, including
President of its U.S. pharmaceutical operations and Managing Director of its
U.K. pharmaceutical operations. From 1976 to 1980 he held various sales and
marketing positions with Eli Lilly & Co., a pharmaceutical company. He is
currently a director of the Biotechnology Industry Organization, and a member of
the governing body of its emerging company section. He was also President of the
Board of Directors of the Association of Biotechnology Companies. Mr. Wiggans
received his B.S. from the University of Kansas and M.B.A. from Southern
Methodist University.
W. Scott Harkonen has served as Senior Vice President, Product
Development and Operations of the Company since September 1995. From March 1991
to August 1995, Dr. Harkonen served as Vice President of medical and regulatory
affairs at Univax Biologics, Inc., a biotechnology company. From May 1989 to
February 1991, he served as Vice President, medical and regulatory affairs at
Scios Nova, Inc., a biotechnology company. He is currently a director of Planet
Biotechnology, a privately-owned biopharmaceutical company. He received his B.A.
and M.D. from the University of Minnesota and M.B.A. from the University of
California, Berkeley.
Cynthia M. Butitta has served as Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer since December 1995. From June 1994
to December 1995 she served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
InSite Vision, Inc., a pharmaceutical company. From June 1993 until joining
InSite Vision, Ms. Butitta was director of finance for the worldwide sales and
support group of Tandem Computers Incorporated. From 1988 to 1992, she held a
variety of positions with MIPS Computer Systems, Inc., including vice president
of finance, corporate controller and director of sales operations. Ms. Butitta
holds a B.S. in business and accounting from Edgewood College and M.B.A. from
the University of Wisconsin.
Richard J. Hammel has served as Vice President, Commercial Development
of the Company since September 1995. From September 1993 to September 1995, he
served at Matrix Pharmaceutical, Inc., a biotechnology company, as Vice
President of Business Development, Sales and Marketing. From March 1992 to
September 1995, he served as a Senior Consultant to Marketing Corporation of
America, a marketing company. From 1986 to March 1992, he served at
-31-
<PAGE> 32
Glaxo, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, most recently as Director of Business
Development. He received a B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of
Minnesota.
David A. Lowin has served as Vice President, Intellectual Property and
Chief Patent Counsel of the Company since January 1995 and Assistant Secretary
of the Company since July 1995. From 1982 to January 1995, Mr. Lowin served at
Syntex Corporation, a pharmaceutical company, as Assistant Director of the
Patent Law Department. From 1979 to 1982, he served as an associate at Owen,
Wickersham & Erickson. He received a B.A. from Hobart College and a J.D. from
the Franklin Pierce Law Center.
Ernst H. Rinderknecht has served as Vice President, Process Sciences of
the Company since September 1994. From 1980 to September 1994, Dr. Rinderknecht
worked at Genentech in various positions, since 1987 as Staff Scientist. He
received his M.S. from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) and Ph.D.
in Biochemistry from the University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Each executive officer serves at the sole discretion of the Board of
Directors.
-32-
<PAGE> 33
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The Company's Common Stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National
Market under the symbol CNCT since the effective date of the Company's initial
public offering on January 31, 1996. Prior to the initial public offering, no
public market existed for the Common Stock. The price per share reflected in the
table below represents the range of low and high closing sale prices for the
Company's Common Stock as reported in the Nasdaq National Market for the
quarters indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 HIGH LOW
----------------------------------- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter........................................................... $11.25 $8.00
Second Quarter.......................................................... $11.00 $7.75
Third Quarter........................................................... $10.25 $5.75
Fourth Quarter.......................................................... $ 8.75 $6.50
</TABLE>
The Company had approximately 237 stockholders of record as of February
28, 1997, including several holders who are nominees for an undetermined number
of beneficial owners.
The Company has never paid cash dividends on its capital stock. The
Company currently anticipates that it will retain all available funds for use in
the operation and expansion of its business, and does not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. However, the Board of Directors of the
Company will review the dividend policy periodically to determine whether the
declaration of dividends is appropriate. The Company must obtain the approval of
its bank before declaring or paying dividends.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
On December 4, 1996, the Company sold 972,224 shares of common stock to
four institutional accredited investors at a price of $6.1714 per share for an
aggregate purchase price of $599,983.20. No underwriter was involved in this
private placement. The shares were sold under an exemption from registration
pursuant to Rule 506 under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the "Securities Act"). No general solicitation or advertisement was
made in connection with the private placement.
On December 31, 1996, as partial consideration for the Company's
acquisition of the U.S. and Canadian rights to Ridaura(R) from SmithKline
Beecham, the Company issued 637,733 shares of the Company's common stock to
SmithKline Beecham Properties, Inc. ("SKP"). No underwriter was involved in
such issuance. The Company relied on the exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof. The
Company determined that such exemption was available based upon SKP's access to
information about the Company (the Company provided SKP with copies of all of
its material reports and registration statements filed with the Commission),
SKP's sophistication as an affiliate of a large publicly-held company, and a
number of representations and warranties made by SKP regarding its investment
intent and understanding that the shares are "restricted securities." The total
value of the shares issued to SKP is required to be $9.0 million on December
31, 1997; to achieve such value, the Company may be obligated to issue
additional shares to SKP on such date, or may repurchase a portion of the
originally-issued shares to reduce the market value of the remaining shares to
$9.0 million. In connection with this issuance, the Company agreed to file in
December 1997 a registration statement on Form S-3 covering resale of the
shares and to maintain the registration statement in effect for up to two years.
In January 1996, prior to the Company's initial public offering, the
Company issued options to two consultants, Christian Schwabe and Bogart
Delafiel, to purchase 1,124 and 5,000 shares of common stock at $0.45 and
$4.50, respectively. Such issuances were deemed to be exempt from registration
under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 701.
In March 1996, the Company issued options to purchase 13,488 shares of
common stock at $0.45 per share to three members of the Company's Scientific
Advisory Board. These options were granted outside of the 1994 Stock Plan but
are subject to the same terms as those options granted under the Plan. the
Company relied on the exemption from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof. The optionees represented
their intentions to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a
view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof. All optionees
had adequate access, through their relationships with the Company as members of
the Scientific Advisory board, to information about the Company.
-33-
<PAGE> 34
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE
AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
The following table presents selected financial data of the Company.
This historical data should be read in conjunction with the attached
consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" appearing in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
inception
(February 8,
Years Ended December 31, 1993) to
----------------------------------------------- December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Statement of Operations Data:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Product revenues $ 428 $ -- $ -- $ --
Operating costs and expenses:
License amortization 594 -- -- --
Research and development 13,161 8,271 6,436 836
General and administrative 5,434 2,113 1,317 240
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating costs and expenses 19,189 10,384 7,753 1,076
Loss from operations (18,761) (10,384) (7,753) (1,076)
Interest income (expense), net 247 12 (97) (2)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss $ (18,514) $ (10,372) $ (7,850) $ (1,078)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Net loss per share $ (2.71)
Shares used to calculate net loss per share 6,824,668
Pro forma net loss per share $(1.79)
Shares used to calculate pro forma net
loss per share 5,778,372
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments $ 24,554 $ 9,023 $ 1,287 $ 729
Working capital 14,820 5,844 (979) (147)
Total assets 47,922 11,796 2,901 930
Notes payable -- 2,205 1,350 --
Non-current portion of capital lease obligations,
capital loans and long-term debt 2,978 4,933 829 13
Other long-term liabilities (1) 10,858 1,262 1,293 --
Redeemable convertible preferred stock 2,000 -- -- --
Total stockholders' equity (net capital deficiency) 21,800 63 (2,919) (60)
</TABLE>
(1) See Note 5 of Notes to Financial statements for a description of the
Company's other long-term liabilities.
-34-
<PAGE> 35
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion contains, in addition to historical information,
certain forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The
Company's actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in
these forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below as well as
those discussed above under the heading "Additional Factors That May Affect
Future Results".
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial
Statements and Notes contained in Item 8.
OVERVIEW
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. acquires, develops and markets
products in the areas of rheumatology and dermatology. In February 1996, the
company completed an initial public offering of its common stock and became a
public company.
The Company's products under development include gamma interferon for
the treatment of atopic dermatitis and keloids; betamethasone mousse for the
treatment of scalp psoriasis and other scalp dermatoses; ConXn(TM) (relaxin) for
the treatment of scleroderma and other fibrotic disorders and T-cell Receptor
(TCR) peptide vaccines for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid
arthritis. At present, these products are all under development and no revenues
have been derived from the sale of these products. There can be no assurance
that any of these potential products will be successfully developed, receive the
necessary regulatory approvals or be successfully commercialized.
In December 1996, the Company acquired exclusive U.S. and Canadian
rights to Ridaura(R) (auranofin), a disease modifying antirheumatic drug, from
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and related entities ("SmithKline"). In return,
the Company agreed to provide SmithKline a $3 million upfront cash payment,
which was paid in January 1997, a non-interest bearing $11 million promissory
note, 637,733 shares of common stock (guaranteed to be worth $9 million on
December 31, 1997) and up to a maximum of $6 million in royalty payments based
on future sales, for a potential aggregate consideration of up to $29 million.
Ridaura(R) is an established therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune
disease that afflicts one to two percent of adult Americans (approximately three
million patients), mostly women.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company recorded its first revenues in December 1996, for a total
of $428,000, due to the initial product sales of Ridaura(R). In addition, the
Company also recorded amortization cost of $594,000 in December 1996 associated
with the acquisition of product rights to Ridaura(R) from SmithKline. The
Company has determined the useful life of the asset to be three years based on
-35-
<PAGE> 36
information regarding products currently in the Company's development pipeline,
competitive products, the off-patent position of Ridaura(R) and expected future
revenues from Ridaura(R) sales.
Research and development expenses were $13.2 million, $8.3 million and
$6.4 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
The increase in research and development expenses in fiscal 1996 over fiscal
1995 was primarily attributable to significant increases in personnel staffing
particularly related to clinical development, commencement of a Phase III
clinical trial of gamma interferon for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a
Phase II clinical trial of gamma interferon for the treatment of keloids, a
Phase II clinical trial of ConXn(TM) for the treatment of scleroderma and a
Phase I/II clinical trial of TCR Peptides for the treatment of multiple
sclerosis, and increased outside services required to support operations. The
research and development spending increase in fiscal 1995 over fiscal 1994 was
primarily due to devoting additional resources to commence the initiation of a
Phase I/II clinical trial of ConXn(TM) for scleroderma, the production of
clinical supplies and increased outside services required to support operations.
The factors contributing to increases in spending were partially offset by
decreases in technology acquisition costs from $1.9 million in fiscal 1994, to
$0.9 million and $35,000 for fiscal 1995 and 1996, respectively. Research and
development expenses are expected to continue to increase due to continued
expansion of development activities, including progression in advanced-stage
clinical trials, and possible acquisition of new technologies and products.
General and administrative expenses increased to $5.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 1996, and from $2.1 million for the same period in 1995,
primarily due to increased support costs associated with operating as a public
company (including costs related to strengthening the senior management team),
professional fees and expenses associated with the acquisition of Ridaura(R),
and other business development expenses. The increase in general and
administrative expenses to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1995,
from $1.3 million for the same period in 1994 was primarily due to increases in
staffing and business development expenses. General and administrative expenses
are expected to continue to increase primarily due to expanded business
development efforts and the creation of a marketing and sales organization.
Interest income was $1.2 million, $0.4 million and $38,000 for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The increase in
interest income in fiscal 1996 over fiscal 1995 was due to higher invested cash
balances from proceeds of the Company's initial public offering and two private
placements of equity securities. The increase in fiscal 1995 from 1994 was due
to higher balances in cash and cash equivalents. Interest earned in the future
will depend on Company funding cycles and prevailing interest rates. Interest
expense increased to $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1996, from
$0.4 million and $0.1 million for the same periods in 1995 and 1994,
respectively, in each year due to increased balances outstanding for obligations
under capital leases and loans, and notes payable.
The Company incurred net losses of $18.5 million, $10.4 million and
$7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively,
primarily due to its development stage activities. The Company expects to incur
substantial additional losses over the next few years and losses are expected to
fluctuate from period to period based on timing of product
-36-
<PAGE> 37
revenues, clinical material purchases, possible acquisitions of new products and
technologies, scale-up activities and clinical activities.
For income tax purposes, the Company had a federal net operating loss
carryforward as of December 31, 1996, of approximately $32.4 million available
to offset future taxable income, if any. The net operating loss carryforward
will expire at various dates beginning from 2008 through 2011, if not utilized.
Utilization of the net operating losses and credits may be subject to
substantial annual limitation due to the "change in ownership" provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. The annual
limitation may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits
before utilizations. (See Note 14 of Notes to Financial Statements)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has financed its operations since inception through
December 31, 1996 primarily through private sales of equity securities, proceeds
from its initial public offering in February 1996 and two self-managed
financings in December 1996 (the sale of its common stock to several
institutional investors and the sale of Series A convertible preferred stock to
an offshore investor).
Working capital increased to $14.9 million at December 31, 1996,
compared to working capital of $5.8 million at December 31, 1995, due to the
receipt of approximately $24.5 million in net proceeds from the initial public
offering and approximately $7.9 million in net proceeds through the two private
placements of equity securities, offset by cash used in operations of
approximately $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1996 and the
repayment of $2.2 million in notes outstanding pursuant to certain technology
licensing agreements. At December 31, 1996, the Company had cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments totaling $24.6 million, compared to $9.0
million at December 31, 1995. It is generally the Company's policy to invest
these funds in highly liquid securities, such as interest-bearing money market
funds, corporate debt, commercial paper and federal agency notes.
Accounts payable increased to $4.2 million at December 31, 1996, an
$3.7 million increase from accounts payable at December 31, 1995. The increase
in accounts payable was primarily due to the Company's obligation to make a
$3.0 million cash payment to SmithKline in January 1997, as part of the
consideration for the acquisition of rights to Ridaura, and to payable expenses
at December 31, 1996 related to the Phase III clinical trial of gamma
interferon for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Accrued liabilities
increased by $1.2 million from $808,000 at fiscal year-end 1995 to $2.0 million
at fiscal year-end 1996, which was primarily due to anticipated consulting and
legal fees associated with the Ridaura acquisition, and to clinical trial
accruals related to the Phase III clinical trial of gamma interferon for the
treatment of atopic dermatitis and the Phase II clinical trial of ConXn for the
treatment of scleroderma.
In connection with its acquisition of the U.S. and Canadian rights to
Ridaura, the Company issued an $11.0 promissory note to SmithKline, which is
due and payable for $6.0 million in January 1998 and $5.0 million in January
1999. The Company intends to repay this note through revenues generated from
Ridaura sales, from raising additional funding (if available), and/or from
available working capital. The Company believes it will be able to repay such
note as it becomes due.
For the year ended December 31, 1996, additions of equipment and
leasehold improvements totaled $0.7 million, of which approximately $0.6 million
was financed through capital lease and loan arrangements. Total additions for
equipment and leasehold improvements from inception to December 31, 1995 were
$1.9 million, which included $0.8 million of additional equipment financed
through capital lease arrangements, and $0.8 million financed through capital
loans. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had invested approximately $2.5
million in property and equipment, and had approximately $1.0 million available
for borrowing under its capital loan arrangement.
On January 2, 1997, the Company entered into a Structured Equity Line
Flexible Financing Agreement (the "Equity Line Agreement") with Kepler Capital
LLC ("Kepler") that allows the Company to access up to $25 million through sales
of its Common Stock. The equity line will be available for a three-year period
beginning on or before December 1, 1997. The Equity Line Agreement provides that
the Company can, at its option, obtain from $500,000 to $2,000,000 at any one
time through a sale of its Common Stock to Kepler, subject to the satisfaction
of certain conditions, including registration of shares for resale, minimum
volume requirements, and a
-37-
<PAGE> 38
minimum trading price of $7.00 per share over a specified period. In addition,
the Company must sell $500,000 of its Common Stock from time to time if the
price per share exceeds $10.00 and minimum volume requirements are met. (See
Note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements)
The Company believes that its existing cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and funds available under the capital loan and the
structured equity line, will be sufficient to meet the Company's operating
expenses and capital requirements through 1997. The Company's future capital
uses and requirements are expected to increase in future periods and will depend
on numerous factors, including the progress of its research and development
programs, the progress of clinical and advanced-stage clinical testing, the time
and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals, the cost of filing,
prosecuting, and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights,
competing technological and market developments, the ability of the Company to
establish collaborative arrangements, the possible acquisition of new products
and technologies, and the development of commercialization activities. As a
result, the Company will require substantial additional funds prior to reaching
profitability and may attempt to raise additional funds through equity or debt
financings, collaborative arrangements with corporate partners or from other
sources. There can be no assurance that additional funding will be available for
the Company to finance its ongoing operations on acceptable terms, if at all.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Item 14(a) for an index to the consolidated financial statements
and supplementary financial information that are attached hereto.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this report
because the Company will file a definitive proxy statement within 120 days after
the end of its fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A (the "Proxy Statement")
for its annual meeting of shareholders to be held May 14, 1997 and the
information included therein is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information with respect to directors of the Company and the Chairman
of the Company's Board of Directors is incorporated by reference from the
information under the caption "Election of Directors--Nominees" in the Company's
Proxy Statement.
Information as to the Company's executive officers appears at the end
of Part I of this report.
-38-
<PAGE> 39
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated by reference from the information under the caption
"Executive Compensation and Related Information" in the Company's Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Incorporated by reference from the information under the caption
"Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the
Company's Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated by reference from the information under the caption
"Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" in the Company's Proxy
Statement.
-39-
<PAGE> 40
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:
1. Financial Statements and Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent
Auditors
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity - Three years
ended December 31, 1996.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December
31, 1996, 1995, and 1994.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not
applicable or are not required as the information required to
be set forth therein is included in the financial statements
or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits (numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBITS
<S> <C> <C>
3.4(1) Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.5(1) Form of Bylaws.
3.6(5) Certificate of Designation of 7% Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A of Connective
Therapeutics, Inc., as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 4, 1996.
4.1(1) Form of Common Stock Certificate.
10.1(1) Form of Indemnification Agreement.
10.2(1)* 1994 Stock Plan and form of Option Agreement.
10.3(1)* 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of Subscription Agreement.
10.4(1)* 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan and form of Option Agreement.
10.5(1) Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated February 14, 1995 among the
Registrant and certain security holders of the Registrant and Amendments Nos. 1 and 2 thereto
dated May 31, 1995 and September 28, 1995.
10.6(1)(2) License Agreement dated September 27, 1993, between Genentech, Inc. and the Company, Amendment
dated July 14, 1994, and side letter agreement dated November 17, 1994.
10.8(1) Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated June 3, 1994, by and between the Company and XOMA
Corporation.
</TABLE>
-40-
<PAGE> 41
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10.9(1)(2) Technical Collaboration and Manufacturing Agreement, dated May 24, 1994, by and between the
Company and Scios Nova Inc.
10.10(1)(2) Technology Acquisition Agreement dated June 3, 1994 by and between the Company and XOMA
Corporation, and License Agreement dated February 27, 1990 by and between Arthur A. Vandenbark,
Ph.D. and XOMA Corporation.
10.11(1)(2) Agreement on Interferon Gamma-1B dated December 8, 1995 by and between the Company and
Genentech, Inc.
10.12(1) Equipment Lease Line, dated May 31, 1994 with Lease Management Services, Inc.
10.13(1) Business Loan Agreement, dated July 18, 1995, between the Company, Silicon Valley Bank and
MMC/GATX Partnership No. 1.
10.14(1)(2) Research Collaboration and Assignment Agreement, dated July 1, 1994, between the Company and
Dr. Arthur A. Vandenbark.
10.15(1) Employment and Bonus Agreement between the Company and Edward Amento, dated November 17, 1993.
10.16(1) Secured Loan Agreements between the Company and Edward Amento dated November 1, 1993 and
July 11, 1994, respectively.
10.17(1) Consulting Agreement dated November 17, 1993 between the Company and Brian Seed.
10.18(1) Consulting Agreement dated November 17, 1993 between the Company and Eugene Bauer.
10.19(1) Employment Agreement dated June 9, 1994 between the Company and Thomas Wiggans.
10.20(1) Loan Agreements between the Company and Thomas Wiggans dated July 15, 1994 and August 1, 1994.
10.21(1) Letter Agreement with G. Kirk Raab dated October 1, 1995.
10.23(1) Facility Master Lease between the Company and Renault & Handley dated February 9, 1994.
10.26(1) Loan and Security Agreement dated December 21, 1995 by and among the Company, Silicon Valley
Bank and MMC/GATX Partnership No. 1.
10.27(3)(2) Agreement on Relaxin Rights in Asia dated April 1, 1996 between the Company and Mitsubishi
Chemical Corporation (Exhibits A and B to Exhibit 10.27 have been previously filed as Exhibit 10.6
above. Confidential treatment has been granted as to certain portions of Exhibit 10.6 by the SEC).
10.28(3)(2) Soltec License Agreement dated June 14, 1996.
10.29(4) Laboratory Services Agreement dated October 24, 1996.
10.30(4) Agreement with Dr. Edward Amento dated October 24, 1996.
10.31(4) Form of Directors and Officers Change in Control Agreement
10.32(5) Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated December 4, 1996 by and among the Company and certain
investors.
10.33(5) Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 4, 1996 by and among the Company and certain
investors.
10.34(5) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 4, 1996 by and among the Company and a certain
purchaser.
10.35(5) Warrant, dated December 4, 1996 between the Company and a certain purchaser.
10.36(6)+ Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 2, 1996 between the Company, SmithKline Beecham
Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Pharma Inc., SmithKline Beecham Properties, Inc. and SmithKline
Beecham Inter-American Corporation.
10.37(6) Stock Issuance Agreement dated December 31, 1996 between the Company and SmithKline Beecham
Properties, Inc.
10.38(6) Secured Promissory Note dated December 31, 1996 issued to SmithKline Beecham Corporation.
10.39(6) Security Agreement dated December 31, 1996 between the Company and SmithKline Beecham
Corporation.
10.40(6)+ Supply Agreement dated December 31, 1996 between the Company and SmithKline Beecham Corporation.
10.41(6) Transitional Services Agreement dated December 31, 1996 between the Company and SmithKline
Beecham Corporation.
10.42(7) Structured Equity Line Flexible Financing Agreement dated January 2, 1997 between the Company
and Kepler Capital LLC.
</TABLE>
-41-
<PAGE> 42
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
10.43(7) Registration Rights Agreement dated January 2, 1997 between
the Company and Kepler Capital LLC.
11.1(7) Statement of Computation of Net Loss Per Share.
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
24.1(7) Power of Attorney (see page 44 of the originally-filed
version of this Report)
27.1(7) Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR - filed version only)
</TABLE>
================================================================================
+ Certain portions of this Exhibit have been omitted for which
confidential treatment has been requested and filed separately by the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
* This item is a compensatory plan required to be listed as an exhibit to
this form pursuant to Item 601(a)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K.
1. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit filed with the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-80261) declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on
January 31, 1996.
2. Certain portions of this Exhibit were granted confidential treatment
pursuant to an order from the SEC.
3. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 0-27406) filed with the SEC for
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1996.
4. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 0-27406) filed with the SEC for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1996.
5. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 0-27406) dated December 4, 1996.
6. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit to the Company's Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 0-27406) dated January 15, 1997.
7. Incorporated by reference from an exhibit to the originally-filed
Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-27406) for the year ended December 31,
1996.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The following Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the three months
ended December 31, 1996:
The Company filed a current report on 8-K dated December 4, 1996
reporting the private sale of 972,224 shares of Common Stock to certain
institutional investors and the private sale of 200 shares of 7% Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, to an offshore investor. Such disclosures
were provided under Item 5 (Other Events) and Item 9 (Sale of Equity Securities
Pursuant to Regulation S) of Form 8-K. No financial statements were filed with
this report.
-42-
<PAGE> 43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Palo
Alto, California on this 25th day of April 1997.
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
By: /s/ CYNTHIA M. BUTITTA
Cynthia M. Butitta
Vice President, Finance and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer
-43-
<PAGE> 44
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ THOMAS G. WIGGANS* President, Chief Executive Officer
---------------------------------- and Director
Thomas G. Wiggans (Principal Executive Officer)
April 25, 1997
/s/ CYNTHIA M. BUTITTA* Vice President of Finance and
---------------------------------- Administration and Chief
Cynthia M. Butitta Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer) April 25, 1997
/s/ G. KIRK RAAB* Chairman of the Board of
---------------------------------- Directors
G. Kirk Raab April 25, 1997
/s/ EDWARD P. AMENTO* Director
----------------------------------
Edward P. Amento April 25, 1997
/s/ ALEXANDER E. BARKAS* Director
----------------------------------
Alexander E. Barkas April 25, 1997
/s/ EUGENE A. BAUER* Director
----------------------------------
Eugene A. Bauer April 25, 1997
/s/ ROBERT E. CURRY* Director
----------------------------------
Robert E. Curry April 25, 1997
/s/ BRIAN H. DOVEY* Director
----------------------------------
Brian H. Dovey April 25, 1997
/s/ THOMAS D. KILEY* Director
----------------------------------
Thomas D. Kiley April 25, 1997
/s/ KENNETH B. PLUMLEE* Director
----------------------------------
Kenneth B. Plumlee April 25, 1997
/s/ JOSEPH J. RUVANE, JR.* Director
----------------------------------
Joseph J. Ruvane, Jr. April 25, 1997
/s/ PETRI T. VAINIO* Director
----------------------------------
Petri T. Vainio April 25, 1997
*By: /s/ CYNTHIA M. BUTITTA
-------------------------------
Attorney-in-Fact April 25, 1997
</TABLE>
-44-
<PAGE> 45
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors..................... F-2
Balance Sheets........................................................ F-3
Statements of Operations.............................................. F-4
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Net Capital Deficiency)........... F-5
Statements of Cash Flows.............................................. F-6
Notes to Financial Statements......................................... F-7
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE> 46
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Connective Therapeutics, Inc.
(also known as Connetics Corporation)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Connective
Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connetics Corporation) as of December 31, 1996
and 1995, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position of Connective
Therapeutics, Inc. at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Palo Alto, California
January 13, 1997
F-2
<PAGE> 47
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995
------- -------
ASSETS
Current assets:
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $14,555 $ 9,023
Short-term investments 9,999 --
Accounts receivable 428 --
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 124 154
------- -------
Total current assets 25,106 9,177
Property and equipment, net 1,484 1,367
Notes receivable from related parties 301 414
Deposits and other assets 250 838
Licensed assets and product rights 20,781 --
------- -------
$47,922 $11,796
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 4,179 $ 441
Accrued liabilities 2,023 808
Accrued process development expenses 1,198 668
Accrued payroll and related expenses 394 157
Current portion of capital lease obligations, capital loans and long-term debt 2,408 1,259
-------- --------
Total current liabilities 10,202 3,333
Notes payable -- 2,205
Non-current portion of capital lease obligations, capital loans and long-term debt 3,062 4,933
Other long-term liabilities 10,858 1,262
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series A 2,000 --
Commitments
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized;
redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series A, 200 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1996; no shares issued and outstanding
at December 31, 1995; and preferred stock, no shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 3,965,137 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1995 -- 4
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized;
9,057,393 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 1996 and
908, 511 issued and outstanding at December 31, 1995 9 1
Additional paid in capital 60,998 21,425
Notes receivable from stockholders (75) (134)
Deferred compensation, net (1,315) (1,933)
Other (3) --
Accumulated deficit (37,814) (19,300)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity 21,800 63
-------- --------
$ 47,922 $ 11,796
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE> 48
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Product revenues $ 428 $ -- $ --
Operating costs and expenses:
License amortization 594 -- --
Research and development 13,161 8,271 6,436
General and administrative 5,434 2,113 1,317
----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating expenses 19,189 10,384 7,753
Interest income 1,190 405 38
Interest expense (943) (393) (135)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss $ (18,514) $ (10,372) $ (7,850)
=========== =========== ===========
Net loss per share $ (2.71)
Shares used to calculate net loss per share 6,824,668
Pro forma net loss per share $(1.79)
Shares used to calculate pro forma
net loss per share 5,778,372
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE> 49
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CONVERTIBLE ADDITIONAL
PREFERRED STOCK COMMON STOCK PAID IN NOTES
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL RECEIVABLE
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at December 31, 1993 227,081 $ -- 604,802 $ 1 $ 1,037 $ (20)
Issuance of series A preferred stock 1,116,180 1 -- -- 4,950 --
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans -- -- 261,138 -- 117 (77)
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1994 1,343,261 1 865,940 1 6,104 (97)
Issuance of series B preferred stock, net
of issuance costs 2,621,876 3 -- -- 12,787 (28)
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans -- -- 42,571 -- 19 (9)
Deferred compensation related to certain options
and stock purchase rights granted to employees
and consultants -- -- -- -- 2,265 --
Amortization of deferred compensation -- -- -- -- -- --
Issuance of warrants -- -- -- -- 250 --
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1995 3,965,137 4 908,511 1 21,425 (134)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Issuance of common stock in initial public offering
("IPO"), net of issuance costs of $2,981 -- -- 2,500,000 2 24,519 --
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock
in conjunction with IPO in February (3,965,137) (4) 3,965,137 4 -- --
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans,
net of repurchases -- -- 51,586 -- 22 --
Issuance of common stock warrants -- -- 10,328 -- -- --
Issuance of common stock under employee stock
purchase plan -- -- 11,874 -- 96 --
Issuance of common stock pursuant to private
placement, net of issuance costs -- -- 972,224 1 5,929 --
Issuance of common stock upon asset purchase
from SmithKline Beecham -- -- 637,733 1 8,999 --
Payment of notes receivable -- -- -- -- -- 59
Deferred compensation related to certain options
and stock purchase rights granted to consultants -- -- -- -- 145 --
Amortization and reversal of deferred compensation -- -- -- -- (137) --
Unrealized loss on investments -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1996 -- $ -- 9,057,393 $ 9 $ 60,998 $ (75)
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
DEFERRED GAINS/LOSS ACCUMULATED
COMPENSATION ON INVESTMENTS DEFICIT TOTAL
------------ ---------- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balances at December 31, 1993 $ -- $ -- $ (1,078) $ (60)
Issuance of series A preferred stock -- -- -- 4,951
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans -- -- -- 40
Net loss -- -- (7,850) (7,850)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1994 -- -- (8,928) (2,919)
Issuance of series B preferred stock, net
of issuance costs -- -- -- 12,762
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans -- -- -- 10
Deferred compensation related to certain options
and stock purchase rights granted to employees
and consultants (2,265) -- -- --
Amortization of deferred compensation 332 -- -- 332
Issuance of warrants -- -- -- 250
Net loss -- -- (10,372) (10,372)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1995 (1,933) -- (19,300) 63
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Issuance of common stock in initial public offering
("IPO"), net of issuance costs of $2,981 -- -- -- 24,521
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock
in conjunction with IPO in February -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans,
net of repurchases -- -- -- 22
Issuance of common stock warrants -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock under employee stock
purchase plan -- -- -- 96
Issuance of common stock pursuant to private
placement, net of issuance costs -- -- -- 5,930
Issuance of common stock upon asset purchase
from SmithKline Beecham -- -- -- 9,000
Payment of notes receivable -- -- -- 59
Deferred compensation related to certain options
and stock purchase rights granted to consultants (145) -- -- --
Amortization and reversal of deferred compensation 763 -- -- 626
Unrealized loss on investments -- (3) -- (3)
Net loss -- -- (18,514) (18,514)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Balances at December 31, 1996 $ (1,315) $ (3) $ (37,814) $ 21,800
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE> 50
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(18,514) $(10,372) $ (7,850)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,237 393 120
Technology acquired in exchange for note payable and other
long-term liability -- 855 1,850
Amortization of deferred compensation 626 332 --
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (428) -- --
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 30 (72) 18
Notes receivable from related parties 173 (116) (298)
Deposits and other assets 487 (543) 8
Accounts payable 3,738 (117) 409
Accrued liabilities 1,215 587 65
Accrued process development 530 209 459
Accrued payroll and related expenses 237 78 26
Other long-term liabilities 221 (31) 793
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used by operating activities (10,448) (8,797) (4,400)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments (21,650) (7,560) --
Sales and maturities of short-term investments 11,648 7,560 --
Capital expenditures (461) (400) (650)
Licensed assets and product rights (3,000) -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (13,463) (400) (650)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds (payments) from bank loans -- (750) 750
Payment of notes payable (2,205) -- --
Proceeds from capital loans and long-term debt 323 5,230 540
Payments on obligations under capital leases and capital loans (1,244) (319) (111)
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable preferred stock 2,000 -- --
Proceeds from issuance of preferred and common stock, net of issuance costs 30,569 12,772 4,429
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities 29,443 16,933 5,608
-------- -------- --------
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 5,532 7,736 558
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 9,023 1,287 729
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 14,555 $ 9,023 $ 1,287
======== ======== ========
Supplementary information:
Interest paid $ 1,062 $ 274 $ 71
Investing and financing activities:
Assets acquired under capital leases $ 199 $ 171 $ 611
Issuance of preferred stock in exchange for cancellation of accrued
liability related to technology license $ -- $ -- $ 563
Issuance of warrants $ -- $ 250 $ --
Issuance of preferred and common stock in exchange for notes receivable $ -- $ 37 $ 77
Deferred compensation related to stock options and purchase rights $ 145 $ 2,265 $ --
Issuance of common stock for licensed assets and product rights purchased
from SmithKline Beecham $ 9,000 $ -- $ --
Issuance of note payable for licensed assets and product rights purchased
from SmithKline Beecham $ 9,375 $ -- $ --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
<PAGE> 51
CONNECTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1996
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Organization
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated in the
State of Delaware on February 8, 1993. In March 1997, the Company's board of
directors approved a change of the Company's name from "Connective Therapeutics,
Inc." to "Connetics Corporation", subject to approval by the Company's
stockholders at its annual meeting in May 1997. References in this section to
historical results include the Company's results when it was known as
"Connective Therapeutics, Inc." From its inception until December 1996, the
Company was in the development stage, principally involved in research and
development of therapeutics for diseases that involve connective tissues of the
body, obtaining financing, recruiting personnel, securing operating facilities,
and pursuing business development opportunities. On December 31, 1996, the
Company acquired exclusive U.S. and Canadian rights to Ridaura(R), a disease
modifying antirheumatic drug, from SmithKline Beecham Corporation and related
entities. Ridaura(R) is the first product the Company markets and it signifies
the beginning of the Company's transition from purely product development to a
revenue based sales and marketing company. The Company has no products from its
current development programs available for sale and does not expect to have any
for several years. Accordingly, the Company's ability to continue its research
and development activities is dependent upon the ability of management to obtain
substantial additional financing.
Liquidity and financial viability
In the course of its development activities, the Company has sustained
continuing operating losses and expects such losses to increase over at least
the next several years. The Company plans to continue to finance its operating
activities with a combination of stock sales, such as the initial public
offering completed in February 1996 and the self-managed private financings in
December 1996, payments from corporate partnering arrangements, acquisition of
revenue generating products such as Ridaura(R) and/or debt financing.
Ultimately, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon obtaining substantial additional financings and upon achieving profitable
operations through the successful commercialization of products.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with banks and
money market instruments with original maturity of 90 days or less. Investments
with maturities beyond three months at the date of acquisition and that mature
within one year from the balance sheet date are considered to be short-term
investments. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are carried at fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate
component of stockholders' equity. The cost of securities sold is based on the
specific identification method.
<PAGE> 52
Management of the Company believes it has established guidelines for
investment of its excess cash relative to diversification and maturities that
maintain safety and liquidity.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets, generally three to
five years. Assets acquired under capital lease arrangements are amortized over
the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the lease term.
Fair value of financial instruments
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures About
Fair Value of Financial Instruments," requires that fair values be disclosed for
most of the Company's financial instruments. The carrying amount of cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments, accounts receivable, current
liabilities, notes payable, and long-term lease obligations, loans and debt are
considered to be representative of their respective fair values.
Research and development
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Revenue recognition
Revenues from product sales are recognized upon shipment.
Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method
where deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled.
Net loss per share
Net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding. Common equivalent shares from stock options
and convertible preferred stock are excluded from the computation as their
effect is antidilutive, except that, pursuant to Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletins, common equivalent shares issued during
the twelve-month period prior to the initial public offering in February 1996
have been included in the calculation as if they were outstanding for all
periods through December 31, 1995 (using the treasury stock method for stock
options and the anticipated offering price). Historical net loss per share
calculated on this basis for 1995 was $(2.34). Pro forma net loss per share for
1995 has been computed as described above and also gives effect to the
conversion of convertible preferred shares not included above that automatically
converted into common shares upon completion of the Company's initial public
offering (using the if-converted method) from the original date of issuance.
<PAGE> 53
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New accounting standards
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," which requires the Company to adopt disclosure
provisions for stock-based compensation effective January 1, 1996. The standard
defines a fair value method of accounting for stock options and other equity
instruments. Under the fair value method, compensation is measured at the grant
date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service
period, which is usually the vesting period. This standard encourages rather
than requires companies to adopt the fair value method of accounting for
employee stock-based transactions. Companies are permitted to continue to
account for such transactions under Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," but will be required to make
pro forma disclosures as if the fair value method had been applied. The Company
has elected to continue to apply APB Opinion No. 25 in its financial statements
and has provided pro forma disclosures in the accompanying notes to financial
statements.
Effective January 1, 1996, the Company adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" ("Statement No. 121").
Statement No. 121 requires losses from impairment to be recorded on long-lived
assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the assets' carrying amount. The adoption of Statement No. 121 did not have a
material effect on the Company's financial statements for the twelve months
ended December 31, 1996.
2. CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS:
The following is a summary of available-for-sale investments ( tables in
thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996
--------------------------------------------------
Amortized Gross Gross
Costs Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Gains Loss Fair Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Corporate bonds $ 9,802 $ 2 $ (5) $ 9,799
Commercial paper 8,269 -- -- 8,269
Certificate of deposits 5,021 -- -- 5,021
Money market funds 14 -- -- 14
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total 23,106 2 (5) 23,103
Less amount classified as cash equivalents (13,104) -- -- (13,104)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total short-term investments $ 10,002 $ 2 $ (5) $ 9,999
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 54
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Costs Gains Loss Fair Value
--------- ----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Money market funds $ 1,686 $ - $ - $ 1,686
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents (1,686) - - (1,686)
-------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Total short-term investments $ - $ - $ - $ -
======== ========== ========== =========
</TABLE>
The net unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale
investments included as a separate component of stockholders' equity at December
31, 1996 totaled $(3,000). The gross realized gains on sales of available-for-
sale investments for the year ended December 31, 1996 totaled $543,000, and the
gross realized losses for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 totaled
$289,000 and $21,000, respectively. Realized gains and losses were calculated
based on the specific identification method.
3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1996 1995
------ -------
<S> <C> <C>
Laboratory equipment................................ $1,357 $ 928
Computer equipment.................................. 288 217
Furniture and fixtures.............................. 224 169
Leasehold improvements.............................. 672 567
------ ------
2,541 1,881
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization...... (1,057) (514)
------ ------
Property and equipment, net......................... $1,484 $1,367
====== ======
</TABLE>
Property and equipment includes assets under capitalized leases at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 of approximately $1,005,000 and $805,000,
respectively. Accumulated amortization related to leased assets was
approximately $559,000 and $280,000 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
4. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM RELATED PARTIES
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company held notes receivable from
officers of the Company totaling $301,000 and $414,000, respectively. These
notes, which bear interest at rates ranging from 6% to 8% annually, are
collateralized by certain personal assets of the officers and are generally due
and payable within three to five years.
5. RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENTS:
Licensed Assets and Product Rights
In December 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with SmithKline
Beecham Corporation and affiliated entities ("SmithKline") under which the
Company acquired exclusive United States and Canadian rights to Ridaura(R), a
disease modifying antirheumatic drug. Under
<PAGE> 55
the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company provided a $3.0 million upfront cash
payment, which was paid in January 1997, a non-interest bearing $11.0 million
promissory note payable in two installments, in January 1998 and January 1999 of
$6.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, 637,733 shares of common stock with
a guaranteed value of $9.0 million at December 31, 1997, and up to $6.0 million
in royalty payments based on future product sales, for a potential aggregate
consideration of up to $29.0 million. The $11.0 million promissory note was
discounted at inception using an imputed interest rate of 11% and future imputed
interest expense attributable to these payments is $1.6 million. The amount of
the discounted note, $9.4 million, has been included in other long-term
liabilities, and the total purchase price of $21.4 million has been capitalized.
The Company has determined the useful life of this asset to be three years based
on information regarding products currently in the Company's development
pipeline, competitive products, the off-patent position of Ridaura(R) and
expected future revenues from Ridaura(R), and has recorded amortization of $0.6
million in December 1996.
Under a related Transitional Services Agreement, customer orders and
distribution for the product will continue to be managed by SmithKline through
1997 only with no additional consideration for performing such services. The
parties also entered into a Supply Agreement, under which SmithKline will
manufacture and supply Riduara(R) in final package form to the Company for an
initial term through December 2001.
License agreements
In September 1993, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement and a
License Agreement with a corporation (the "Licensor"), which was subsequently
amended in July 1994, for an exclusive right to make, use and sell certain
products arising from licensed technology in a defined field and territory in
exchange for Series A preferred stock which was issued in September 1994. The
Company charged the value of the preferred stock to research and development
expense in 1993. In addition, the Company charged $684,000 to expense in 1994
for the purchase of research materials and payment of technology transfer costs
under the agreement. This amount is due in September 1998 and has been included
in other long-term liabilities. The Company will also pay to the Licensor
royalties on sales of products arising from the licensed technology, if any. In
April 1996, the Company acquired worldwide rights to such technology from the
Licensor.
In June 1996, the Company entered into an exclusive License Agreement
with Soltec Research PTY Ltd. (the "Licensor"), to develop and market
betamethasone mousse (a foam mousse formulation of the dermatologic drug,
betamethasone valerate) in North America. Under the terms of the Agreement, the
Company will pay $75,000, of which $35,000 was paid in 1996, in licensing fee to
the Licensor (based on certain milestones) plus royalties on future sales of
products, if any, arising from the licensed technology. The Company also has an
exclusive option on the Licensor's foam mousse system for the delivery of other
compounds.
Technology acquisition agreement
In June 1994, the Company entered into a Technology Acquisition
Agreement (the "Agreement") with a corporation to purchase all rights to certain
technology and for the exclusive right to make, use and sell certain products
pursuant to a sublicense agreement in exchange for the
<PAGE> 56
issuance of a $1,350,000 subordinated promissory note. The note, including
interest, was paid in full in February 1996 after the closing of the Company's
initial public offering of common stock. In addition to this note, the Company
has accrued additional consideration of $500,000, which is payable by the
Company upon the earlier of the achievement of commencement of phase III
clinical trials for a product involving the licensed technology, or six years
from the date of the agreement. This amount has been included in other long-term
liabilities.
The Agreement also provided for certain contingent payments based on
future financings. As a result of the Series B financing which was completed in
1995, the Company issued an additional note in the amount of $855,000 under this
Agreement. The note, including interest, was paid in full in February 1996 after
the closing of the Company's initial public offering of common stock. An
additional $1,000,000 will be payable by the Company upon FDA approval of a
product involving the licensed technology.
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company is also committed to pay
royalties on applicable sales.
Technology license agreement
In December 1995, the Company entered into a Technology License
Agreement (the "License") to acquire exclusive rights to develop and market
products arising from certain licensed technology, other than for its currently
marketed indications, for dermatological diseases in the United States as part
of a collaborative marketing and profit sharing agreement. Such agreement is
contingent upon the Company using its best efforts to achieve commencement of a
Phase III clinical trial within 30 months of the agreement effective date. In
September 1996, the Company achieved this milestone with the initiation of a
Phase III clinical trial.
The Company will fund all costs to develop a product using the licensed
technology and has the option to defer payments for the purchase of commercial
materials from the licensor, if any, in exchange for certain debt instruments.
If the Company is successful in commercialization of a product using the
licensed technology, and if certain defined annual sales levels are met, the
licensor has the right to co-promote the product upon terms mutually agreeable
to the parties.
Expenses
Expenses under all of the Company's research and license agreements
totaled $35,000, $855,000 and $3,089,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively.
6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-Term Debt
On December 21, 1995, the Company entered into a term Loan and Security
Agreement (the "Term Loan") with a bank consortium (the "Lenders") under which
the Company borrowed $5,000,000. The Term Loan bears interest at 13%, with
interest only payments for the first six
<PAGE> 57
months, and interest and principal payments for the following 30 months. In
connection with the Term Loan, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 73,071
shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.78 per share. The warrant is exercisable
at any time through December 2002. In conjunction with the Term Loan, the
Company granted the lender a first security interest in its corporate assets.
Under the terms of the loan, the Company is required to maintain a minimum cash
balance of the greater of $6,000,000 or six times the Company's average monthly
cash usage. If the Company violates the covenants during the loan period, the
Company would be required to pledge restricted cash of 65% of the outstanding
loan, or $2,681,000 as of December 31, 1996, to cure the violation.
Future minimum principal payments under the Term Loan include
$1,929,000 and $2,196,000 for the years ending December 31, 1997 and 1998,
respectively.
Convertible Subordinated Note Financing
On December 7, 1995, the Company entered into a Master Bridge Loan
Agreement (the "Bridge Loan") with certain shareholders to provide for
borrowings up to $5 million. The Company did not draw down any portion of this
Bridge Loan and the right to draw down funds expired upon the successful
completion of the Company's initial public offering in February 1996. In
connection with the Bridge Loan, the Company issued five-year warrants to
purchase a total of 22,727 shares of common stock at the exercise price equal to
$11.00, the price per share of securities issued in the Company's initial public
offering.
Structured Equity Line Flexible Financing
On January 2, 1997, the Company entered into a Structured Equity Line
Flexible Financing Agreement (the "Agreement") with Kepler Capital LLC
("Kepler") that allows the Company to access up to $25 million through sales of
its Common Stock. The equity line will be available for a three-year period
beginning on or before December 1, 1997. The Agreement provides that the Company
can obtain from $500,000 to $2,000,000 at any one time through a sale of its
Common Stock to Kepler, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions,
including registration of the shares for resale, minimum volume requirements,
and a minimum trading price of $7.00 per share over a specified period. In
addition, the Company must sell $500,000 of its Common Stock from time to time
if the price per share exceeds $10.00 and certain volume conditions are met.
Such sales will occur no more frequently than every 60 trading days. Any shares
sold under the equity line will be priced at 93% of the lesser of (i) the
average of the daily low trading price of the Common Stock for the 5 days
preceding the sale and (ii) the weighted average of daily low trading price of
the Common Stock during a valuation period. The purchase price will be subject
to further adjustment, up to a maximum discount of 15% depending on the length
of the valuation period - the period following the purchase date and ending on
the day, not to exceed 80 trading days, on which the aggregate value of open
market trading during the period equals or exceeds the aggregate value of open
market trading during the 20 days preceding the purchase date. As a commitment
fee to Kepler for keeping the equity line available, the Company has issued a
warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of Common Stock (see Note 11).
<PAGE> 58
7. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS AND CAPITAL LOANS
The Company has capital lease and capital loan credit lines available
totaling $3,245,000 at December 31, 1996, of which $975,000 was unused and
available at December 31, 1996. Under the terms of the master lease agreement,
ownership of the leased equipment reverts to the Company at the end of the lease
term.
As of December 31, 1996, future minimum lease payments under capital
leases and principal payments on capital loans are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CAPITAL LEASES CAPITAL LOANS
-------------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Year ending December 31:
1997...................................................... $ 428 $ 96
1998...................................................... 411 110
1999...................................................... 79 131
2000...................................................... 54 67
Thereafter................................................ 43 -
----- ----
Total minimum lease and principal payments, respectively.... 1015 $404
====
Less amount representing interest........................... 167
-----
Present value of future payments............................ 848
Less current portion of capital lease obligations........... 329
-----
Non-current portion of capital lease obligations............ $ 519
=====
</TABLE>
The obligations under the capital leases and loans are secured by the
leasehold improvements and equipment financed, bear interest at fixed rates of
approximately 8% to 14% and are payable in monthly installments through January
2002.
8. OPERATING LEASES
The Company subleases its facility under a noncancelable operating
lease which expires in July 1999, with an option to extend the term of the lease
for one additional period of two years. The future minimum rental payments under
the leases are as follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
Years ending December 31:
1997................................................ $ 561
1998................................................ 589
1999................................................ 352
------
$1,502
</TABLE>
The Company recognizes rent expenses on a straight-line basis over
the term of each lease. Rent expense under operating leases was approximately
$425,000, $416,000 and $325,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively.
9. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM STOCKHOLDERS
At December 31, 1996, the Company held $75,000 in notes receivable from
certain stockholders for the purchase of the Company's common stock. These notes
bear interest at rates ranging from 6% to 7% annually and are secured by the
shares of common stock held by the
<PAGE> 59
borrowers. The notes are due and payable, together with any unpaid interest, no
later than either the fourth or fifth anniversary of the note, or, for certain
of these notes, within 30 days of termination of employment with the Company.
10. REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
In December 1996, the Company issued 200 shares of 7% Series A
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock"),
par value $.001 per share, in a Regulation S offering at a per share price of
$10,000 with a mandatory redemption date of December 4, 1999. Dividends and
principal on the Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock are convertible into common
stock at a conversion price equal to 85% of the average closing bid price for
the ten trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. Each holder is
entitled to convert all or a portion of its Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock
into common stock at any time. Any Series A Redeemable Preferred Stock that upon
conversion would result in the cumulative issuance of common stock in excess of
20% of the outstanding common stock, will be automatically redeemed by the
Company for cash at a redemption price equal to 120% of the $10,000 original
purchase price plus accrued dividends at the rate of 7%.
11. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company is authorized to issue two classes of shares, common stock
(Common Stock) and preferred stock (Preferred Stock), each with par value of
$.001 per share. Prior to the Company's initial public offering, two series of
Preferred Stock, Series A and B were issued. In connection with the initial
public offering of the Company's common stock in February 1996, each previously
outstanding share of preferred stock (an aggregate of 3,965,137 shares) was
converted into one share of common stock and all previously authorized preferred
stock was eliminated. The Company's Articles of Incorporation was restated to
delete all references to Series A and B of Preferred Stock, and to authorize a
new class of 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock.
Warrants
In July 1995, the Company issued warrants to purchase 18,395 shares of
Series B Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $4.89 per share pursuant to a
capital lease and capital loan agreement. Each warrant for the purchase of
preferred stock was converted into a warrant for the purchase of one share of
common stock and such warrants are exercisable any time through the later of
seven years from grant date or five years from the Company's initial public
offering of common stock in February 1996.
In connection with a Master Bridge Loan Agreement with certain
stockholders of the company in December 1995, the Company issued warrants which
expire in December 2000 to purchase a total of 22,727 shares of Common Stock at
a price of $11.00 per share.
Also in December 1995, in connection with a loan and security
agreement with a bank consortium, the Company issued warrants which expire in
December 2002 to purchase 73,071 shares of Common Stock at a price of $5.78 per
share.
<PAGE> 60
In conjunction with the Company's issuance of 200 shares of Series A
Redeemable Preferred Stock in December 1996 (see Note 10), warrants were issued
that allow the holders to purchase up to 20,000 shares of the Company's common
stock at an exercise price equal to 110% of the closing bid price on December 4,
1996, or $7.425 per share, with an expiration date of December 4, 2001.
In conjunction with the Structured Equity Line Flexible Financing
Agreement in December 1996 (See Note 6), the Company issued a warrant on January
2, 1997 to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.25
per share. The warrant is exercisable over a period of 5 years from date of
issuance. On each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the beginning
of the commitment period, the Company will issue the Investor an additional
five-year warrant exercisable for a number of shares based on the amount of
equity line still available to the Company.
Common stock
The Company has the right to repurchase, at the original issue price
per share, certain shares of common stock issued to employees, consultants,
investors and founders. This right generally expires ratably over a period of
time not greater than five years, in accordance with terms determined by the
Board of Directors.
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, outstanding shares of 154,786 and
392,102, respectively, were subject to repurchase at original issue prices
ranging from $0.04 to $0.45 per share, including shares issued pursuant to stock
purchase rights under the 1994 Stock Plan (see Note 12).
Dividend restrictions
The Company's loan agreement with a bank lender prohibits the Company
from declaring or paying a dividend without the banks' prior written consent.
Common shares reserved for future issuance
The Company has reserved shares of common stock as of December 31, 1996
as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1994 Stock Plan............................................... 1,353,347
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan............................. 88,126
1995 Directors Stock Option Plan.............................. 150,000
Common stock warrants......................................... 384,193
-----------
1,975,666
</TABLE>
In addition, the Company is required to reserve shares of common stock
for issuance upon the conversion of the Series A Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock based on the conversion formula. The amount was approximately
344,000 shares at December 31, 1996.
<PAGE> 61
12. STOCK PLANS
1994 Stock Plan
In August 1994, the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") adopted
the 1994 Stock Plan (the "Plan") which authorizes the Board to grant incentive
stock options, nonstatutory stock options, and stock purchase rights for up to
1,349,011 shares of common stock. The Plan was amended in January 1996 to
increase the number of shares by 150,989, bringing the total up to 1,500,000
shares of common stock.
The options under this Plan expire no later than ten years from the
date of grant. The exercise price of the incentive stock options, nonstatutory
stock options and options granted to 10% shareholders shall be at least 100%,
85%, and 110%, respectively, of the fair value of the stock subject to the
option on the grant date. The price for shares purchased pursuant to stock
purchase rights by 10% shareholders shall be at least 100% of the fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant.
The options generally become exercisable at such times as determined by
the Company's Board of Directors, but in no event at a rate of less than 20% per
year for a period of five (5) years from date of grant. Shares granted under the
Plan pursuant to stock purchase rights are generally subject to repurchase by
the Company at the original issue price per share. The Company's right to
repurchase these shares generally expires ratably over a period of time not
greater than five years.
The Company has elected to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," issued in
October 1995. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company
applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its
stock option plans and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation cost. If
the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value
of the options granted at grant date and including stock purchases under the
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net loss and
net loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated
in the table below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Net loss - as reported............................ $(18,514) $(10,372)
Net loss - pro forma.............................. $(19,339) $(10,586)
Net loss per share - as reported.................. $ (2.71) $ (2.34)
Net loss per share - pro forma.................... $ (2.83) $ (2.39)
</TABLE>
Because SFAS No. 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent
to December 31, 1994, its pro forma effect will not be fully reflected until
1997.
<PAGE> 62
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Expected stock price volatility .......................... 60.0%
Risk-free interest rate range ........................... 4.24% - 6.32%
Expected life of options ................................. 1.125 to 2.0 years
Option approach .......................................... multiple
</TABLE>
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 1996 and 1995
was $4.846 and $2.550 per share, respectively.
In July 1994, in conjunction with a research collaboration agreement,
the Company issued an option to purchase 22,483 shares of common stock at $0.45
per share to a consultant under the Plan. The option becomes exercisable based
on the achievement of certain technical milestones, except as to 6,745 shares
which become exercisable on the earlier of the achievement of milestones or over
a period of five years from the date of grant. Compensation expense will be
recorded for the options to purchase 15,738 common shares, for which vesting is
not fixed, based on the difference between the fair value on the date the
milestones are met and the exercise price of the options. The Company may
terminate the agreement and cancel all unvested shares at 30 days' written
notice. At December 31, 1996, none of the shares were exercisable. No
compensation expense has been incurred as of December 31, 1996 as none of the
milestones have been met.
Activity under the plan is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS
------------------------------------------------
SHARES RANGE WEIGHTED
AVAILABLE FOR NUMBER OF OF EXERCISE AVG. PRICE
GRANT SHARES PRICES PER SHARE
----- ------ ------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1993 337,253
Stock purchase rights grants (55,678) -- $0.45 $0.45
Options granted (57,772) 57,772 $0.45 $0.45
-------- ------
Balance, December 31, 1994 223,803 57,772 $0.45 $0.45
Additional shares authorized 1,011,758 -- -- --
Stock purchase rights granted (37,320) -- $0.45 $0.45
Options granted (910,178) 910,178 $0.45-2.22 $0.71
Options exercised -- (3,193) $0.45 $0.45
Options and stock purchase rights canceled 9,778 (8,655) $0.45 $0.45
--------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 297,841 956,102 $0.45-2.22 $0.71
Additional shares authorized 150,989 -- -- --
Options granted (196,540) 196,540 $6.75-11.00 $8.76
Options exercised -- (62,302) $0.45 $0.45
Shares repurchased 10,717 -- $0.45 $0.45
Options canceled 57,154 (57,154) $0.45 $0.45
-------- -----------
Balance, December 31, 1996 320,161 1,033,186 $0.45-11.00 $2.04
</TABLE>
The weighted average contractual lives of the options outstanding at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 were 8.84 and 9.65, respectively. At December 31,
1996 and 1995, options to purchase 284,764 and 99,943 shares were exercisable,
respectively at weighted average exercise prices of $2.329 and $0.7063,
respectively. For the year ended December 31, 1995, 39,378 shares were issued
under the Plan pursuant to stock purchase rights (none at December 31, 1996).
For the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, the Company recorded
deferred compensation expense for the difference between the exercise price and
the deemed fair value of
<PAGE> 63
the Company's common stock, related to shares issued pursuant to stock purchase
rights and options granted in 1995 and 1996. These options were granted to
provide additional incentives to retain management and key employees. This
deferred compensation expense is being amortized over the related vesting
period, generally a 48-month period.
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company's 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan")
was adopted by the Board of Directors in December 1995. A total of 100,000
shares of Common Stock has been reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan.
The Purchase Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Employees (including officers and employee directors) of the Company,
or of any majority owned subsidiary designated by the Board of Directors, are
eligible to participate if they are employed by the Company or any such
subsidiary for at least 20 hours per week and more than 5 months per year. The
Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase Common Stock through
payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of an employee's compensation, at a
price equal to the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the Company's Common
Stock at the beginning or end of the offering period. As of December 31, 1996,
11,874 shares had been issued under the plan and 88,126 shares were reserved for
future issuance.
1995 Director Stock Option Plan
The 1995 Director Stock Option Plan (the "Directors' Plan") was adopted
by the Board of Directors in December 1995. A total of 150,000 shares of Common
Stock has been reserved for issuance under the Directors' Plan. The Directors'
Plan provides for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to nonemployee
directors of the Company.
The Directors' Plan provides that each person who first becomes a
nonemployee director of the Company after the date of the Company's initial
public offering shall be granted a nonstatutory stock option to purchase 30,000
shares of Common Stock (the "First Option") on the date on which the optionee
first becomes a nonemployee director of the Company. The First Option was not
granted to any nonemployee director who was a director as of the date of the
offering. Thereafter, on the date of each annual meeting of the Company's
stockholders, each nonemployee director (including directors who were not
eligible for a First Option) shall be granted an additional option to purchase
7,500 shares of Common Stock (a "Subsequent Option") if, on such date, he or she
shall have served on the Company's Board of Directors for at least six months.
The Directors' Plan provides that the First Option shall become
exercisable in installments as to 25% of the total number of shares subject to
the First Option on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of
the date of grant of the First Option; each Subsequent Option shall become
exercisable in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant of that
Subsequent Option. The exercise price of all stock options granted under the
Directors' Plan shall be equal to the fair market value of a share of the
Company's Common Stock on the date of grant of the option. Options granted under
the Directors' Plan have a term of ten years. No options were granted or
outstanding under the Directors' Plan at December 31, 1996.
<PAGE> 64
13. INCOME TAXES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had a federal net operating loss
carryforward of approximately $32,400,000. The net operating loss carryforward
will expire at various dates beginning from 2008 through 2011, if not utilized.
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Net operating loss carryforward.......... $ 11,300 $ 5,500
Capitalized research and development..... 1,200 1,400
Research credits (expires 2008-2011)..... 800 400
Other.................................... 1,200 --
-------- -------
Net deferred tax assets.................. 14,500 7,300
Valuation allowance...................... (14,500) (7,300)
-------- -------
Total.......................... $ -- $ --
======== =======
</TABLE>
Because of the Company's lack of earnings history, the net deferred tax
asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance.
Utilization of the net operating losses and credits may be subject to a
substantial annual limitation due to the "ownership change" provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated January 13, 1997 in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as
Connetics Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 1996, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements, as amended, included in this Form
10-K/A-2.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-04985) pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, 1994 Stock Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan of
Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connetics Corporation), of our
report dated January 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Connective Therapeutics, Inc. (also known as Connectics
Corporation) included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
Palo Alto, California
April 25, 1997
