PUROFLOW INC
DFAN14A, 1999-08-19
GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT, NEC
Previous: PUROFLOW INC, SC 13D/A, 1999-08-19
Next: UNIFAB INTERNATIONAL INC, DEF 14A, 1999-08-19



                                  SCHEDULE 14A
                                 (Rule 14a-101)

                     INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

                    Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

Filed by the Registrant / /

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant|X|

Check the appropriate box:

         / /      Preliminary Proxy Statement
         / /      Confidential,  for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
                  Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
         / /      Definitive Proxy Statement
         /X/      Definitive Additional Materials
         / /      Soliciting  Material  Pursuant  to  Section  240.14a-11(c)  or
                  Section 240.14a-12


                             PUROFLOW INCORPORATED
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                            THE FULL VALUE COMMITTEE
                             STEEL PARTNERS II, L.P.
                             WARREN G. LICHTENSTEIN
                                ROBERT FRANKFURT
                               JAMES BENENSON, JR.
                                 STEVEN WOLOSKY
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   (Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement)

         Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

         /X/      No fee required.

         / /      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
                  and 0-11.

         (1)      Title  of  each  class  of  securities  to  which  transaction
                  applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Per  unit  price  or other  underlying  value  of  transaction
                  computed pursuant to


<PAGE>
                  Exchange Act Rule 0-11:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




         (4)      Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (5)      Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         / /      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


       / / Check box if any part of the fee is offset as  provided  by  Exchange
Act Rule  0-11(a)(2)  and identify the filing for which the  offsetting  fee was
paid previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

         (1)      Amount Previously Paid:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (2)      Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (3)      Filing Party:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         (4)      Date Filed:

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                       -2-

<PAGE>
                             STEEL PARTNERS II, L.P.
                        150 East 52nd Street, 21st Floor
                            New York, New York, 10022



                                                  August 9, 1999



BY FACSIMILE

The Board of Directors
Puroflow Incorporated
16559 Saticoy Street
Van Nuys, California 91004

Gentlemen:

         Steel Partners is writing this letter in response to your recent letter
and press release,  each dated August 4, 1999, publicly announcing your offer to
settle  our proxy  contest.  Steel  Partners  has made it clear  throughout  its
negotiations  that a board whose majority is composed of Steel's nominees is the
best way to enhance  stockholder value. While Steel Partners is highly confident
that we would be able to  accomplish  our  objectives if we were to proceed with
our proxy solicitation,  we concur that it would be in the best interests of all
parties  involved if we could avoid the  expense and unrest such  actions  would
involve.  To that end, we continue  to be willing to have  discussions  with the
Board of  Directors  and its  representatives,  with a view  towards  reaching a
settlement prior to the Company's annual meeting.

         While we believe the Company's most recent proposal  represents a start
toward reaching a settlement, we believe the offer omits certain important items
requested  by Steel  Partners in its  negotiations  with the Board.  Those items
include:

                  1. That any  standstill  agreement  Steel Partners would enter
                  into  would  terminate  immediately  prior to the next  annual
                  meeting. This would allow Steel Partners to seek a majority of
                  the board seats at the next  annual  meeting  should  Steel be
                  unable  to  accomplish  its goal of  enhancing  value  for all
                  stockholders  as a  result  of its  minority  position  on the
                  board;
                  2.  That  the  Board of  Directors  would  agree to amend  the
                  Company's  Poison  Pill  Rights  Plan so that the  acquisition
                  threshold  is  raised  to  25%,  allowing   additional  equity
                  participation  in the Company without  eliminating the alleged
                  protection   that  the  Poison  Pill   Rights   Plan   affords
                  stockholders; and

                                       -3-

<PAGE>
                  3. That the Board of Directors  would agree to  eliminate  any
                  and  all   related   party   transactions,   including   those
                  transactions   between  the   Company  and  its   non-employee
                  directors.

                  Until receiving your letter,  we believed the Board understood
the importance of these provisions to any settlement. As such, Steel Partners is
unwilling to accept the terms of your proposal  unless these items are included.
However,  if the Company were to agree to the modifications  listed above, Steel
Partners would accept the Company's proposal of a minority position on the Board
of Directors.

                  We  hope  that  the  recent  tenor  of  our   discussions  and
correspondence  will lead to an  agreement  between the  Company and Steel,  and
believe such an agreement will only serve to enhance  shareholder  value, a goal
that should be the main  objective for both parties.  Our offer will remain open
until Wednesday, August 11, and we look forward to your response.


                                             Sincerely,



                                             Warren G. Lichtenstein
                                             Managing Partner


                                       -4-



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission