<PAGE>
AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON JUNE 26, 2000
REGISTRATION NO. 333-95541
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
------------------------
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC.
(FORMERLY WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.)
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
DELAWARE 7372 04-3151064
(State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. employer
of incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) identification number)
</TABLE>
542 AMHERST STREET
NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03063
(603) 886-9050
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices and principal place
of business)
------------------------------
KILLKO A. CABALLERO
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC.
542 AMHERST STREET
NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03063
(603) 886-9050
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
------------------------------
COPIES TO:
MARK L. JOHNSON, ESQ.
EMILY F. HAYES, ESQ.
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 STATE STREET
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02109
------------------------
APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable
after this post-effective Amendment becomes effective.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. / / ____________
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / / ____________
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. / / ____________
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. / /
------------------------
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a),
MAY DETERMINE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(B)(2)
Registration #333-95541
1,302,084 SHARES
[LOGO]
COMMON STOCK
The selling stockholders named on page 42 are offering 1,302,084 shares of
common stock of CUseeMe Networks, Inc., formerly White Pine Software, Inc. We
will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of shares by the selling
stockholders.
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "CUSM."
On June 22, 2000, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the Nasdaq
National Market was $9.875 per share.
The selling stockholders may sell the shares from time to time on the Nasdaq
National Market or otherwise. They may sell the shares at prevailing market
prices or at prices negotiated with buyers. The selling stockholders will be
responsible for any commissions or discounts due to brokers or dealers. The
amount of those commissions or discounts will be negotiated before the sales. We
will pay all of the other offering expenses, which we estimate will total
$100,000.
------------------------
INVESTING IN THESE SHARES INVOLVES RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE
5.
---------------------
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE NOT
APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS
TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
June 26, 2000
<PAGE>
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS.
NEITHER WE NOR THE SELLING STOCKHOLDERS HAVE AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU
WITH INFORMATION DIFFERENT FROM THAT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. THE SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS ARE OFFERING TO SELL, AND SEEKING OFFERS TO BUY, SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK ONLY IN JURISDICTIONS WHERE OFFERS AND SALES ARE PERMITTED. IN THIS
PROSPECTUS, REFERENCES TO "WE," "US" AND "OUR" REFER TO CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC.
AND ITS SUBSIDIARY.
------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
--------
<S> <C>
Prospectus Summary.......................................... 3
Risk Factors................................................ 5
Use of Proceeds............................................. 11
Dividend Policy............................................. 11
Price Range of Our Common Stock............................. 11
Capitalization.............................................. 12
Selected Consolidated Financial Data........................ 13
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 14
Business.................................................... 20
Management.................................................. 34
Related Party Transactions.................................. 41
Principal and Selling Stockholders.......................... 42
Description of Capital Stock................................ 44
Plan of Distribution........................................ 46
Legal Matters............................................... 47
Experts..................................................... 47
Where You Can Find More Information......................... 47
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-1
</TABLE>
------------------------
We own or have rights to trademarks or trade names that we use in
conjunction with the sale of our products and services. Our trademarks include
ClassPoint, CU-SeeMe, CUseeMe Networks, CU-SeeMe Web and MeetingPoint.
2
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
BECAUSE THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY, IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION
THAT MAY BE IMPORTANT TO YOU. YOU SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING
"RISK FACTORS," BEFORE DECIDING TO INVEST IN SHARES OFFERED BY THIS PROSPECTUS.
OUR COMPANY
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
OUR BUSINESS.............................. We develop software solutions that facilitate worldwide
video and audio communication across the Internet,
intranets, extranets and other networks using the
Internet protocol.
OUR PRODUCTS.............................. Our group conferencing software products, CU-SeeMe and
MeetingPoint, create a client-server solution that
allows users to participate in real-time, multipoint,
multimedia conferences from the users' desktop
computers, using existing Internet, intranet and
extranet connections. Our CU-SeeMe Web software provides
multipoint video instant messaging over the Internet. By
developing multimedia conferencing products that require
no proprietary hardware, we are able to offer multimedia
conferencing at a substantially lower price than vendors
of traditional hardware-based systems and thereby to
encourage businesses and others to adopt multimedia
conferencing as a mass communication medium.
OUR MARKET................................ Our customers include Internet service providers, Web
portal sites, businesses, educational institutions,
government organizations and individual consumers. We
market and sell our products in the United States,
Europe and the Pacific Rim through distributors,
resellers, strategic partners, original equipment
manufacturers and our direct sales organization, as well
as directly over the Internet.
OUR NAME AND ADDRESS...................... On May 8, 2000, we changed our corporate name from White
Pine Software, Inc. to CUseeMe Networks, Inc. Our
principal executive offices are located at 542 Amherst
Street, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063. Our telephone
number is (603) 886-9050. Our web site is located at
WWW.CUSEEME.COM; information contained in our web site
is not a part of this prospectus.
ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS................. Since inception, we have incurred substantial losses,
resulting in an accumulated deficit of $33.8 million at
March 31, 2000. We expect to incur additional
substantial losses for the foreseeable future. Market
acceptance of our application hosting services, which we
expect to introduce in the second fiscal quarter of
2000, is critical to our future success. For a
discussion of these and other risks relating to an
investment in our common stock, see "Risk Factors"
below.
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE>
THE OFFERING
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Common Stock Offered: All of the 1,302,084 shares offered by this prospectus
are being sold by the selling stockholders. The selling
stockholders acquired the shares from us in private
placements completed in December 1999.
Use of Proceeds: We will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of
shares by the selling stockholders.
Nasdaq National Market Symbol: CUSM (formerly WPNE)
</TABLE>
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
The summary consolidated financial data presented below should be read in
conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999
and for the three months ended April 2, 1999 and March 31, 2000 and related
notes, which are included in this prospectus. Financial data for the years ended
1996 and 1997 are derived from our consolidated financial statements not
included in this prospectus. The financial data should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations",
contained elsewhere in this prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED
----------------------------------------- ------------------------------
1996 1997 1998 1999 APRIL 2, 1999 MARCH 31, 2000
-------- -------- -------- -------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue:
Software license fees........ $10,500 $ 9,797 $ 6,948 $ 10,715 $ 2,186 $ 3,595
Services and other........... 1,166 1,255 845 1,287 273 497
Total revenue.............. 11,666 11,052 7,793 12,002 2,459 4,092
Gross profit................... 9,454 9,162 6,148 9,454 1,945 3,100
Loss from operations........... (3,790) (7,746) (8,911) (4,931) (1,345) (1,071)
Net loss....................... (3,637) (6,826) (8,424) (4,849) (1,304) (56)
Basic and diluted net loss per
share........................ $ (0.55) $ (0.75) $ (0.86) $ (0.46) $ (0.12) $ (0.00)
======= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Basic and diluted weighted
average shares outstanding... 6,618 9,148 9,798 10,620 10,480 12,086
======= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1999 MARCH 31, 2000
----------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $22,088 $21,561
Working capital............................................. 22,943 24,005
Total assets................................................ 32,047 33,172
Long-term debt, net of current portion...................... -- --
Total stockholders' equity.................................. 27,772 29,088
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
SOME OF THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS THAT INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. YOU CAN IDENTIFY
THESE STATEMENTS BY FORWARD-LOOKING WORDS SUCH AS "MAY," "WILL," "EXPECT,"
"ANTICIPATE," "BELIEVE," "ESTIMATE," "CONTINUE" AND SIMILAR WORDS. YOU SHOULD
READ STATEMENTS THAT CONTAIN THESE WORDS CAREFULLY BECAUSE THEY (1) DISCUSS OUR
FUTURE EXPECTATIONS, (2) CONTAIN PROJECTIONS OF OUR FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS OR
FINANCIAL CONDITION OR (3) STATE OTHER "FORWARD-LOOKING" INFORMATION. WE BELIEVE
IT IS IMPORTANT TO COMMUNICATE CERTAIN OF OUR EXPECTATIONS TO OUR INVESTORS.
THERE MAY BE EVENTS IN THE FUTURE, HOWEVER, THAT WE ARE NOT ACCURATELY ABLE TO
PREDICT OR OVER WHICH WE HAVE NO CONTROL. THE RISK FACTORS LISTED IN THIS
SECTION, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE IN THIS PROSPECTUS, PROVIDE
EXAMPLES OF RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND EVENTS THAT MAY CAUSE OUR ACTUAL RESULTS TO
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE EXPECTATIONS WE DESCRIBE IN OUR FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. BEFORE YOU INVEST IN OUR COMMON STOCK, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THE
OCCURRENCE OF ANY OF THE EVENTS DESCRIBED IN THESE RISK FACTORS AND ELSEWHERE IN
THIS PROSPECTUS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS, FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. IN SUCH CASE, THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR
COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE AND YOU COULD LOSE ALL OR PART OF YOUR INVESTMENT.
WE HAVE INCURRED SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES IN THE PAST AND MAY NOT BE PROFITABLE IN THE
FUTURE.
We may never generate significant revenue or be profitable. Since we began
operations, we have incurred substantial losses. We incurred net losses of $8.4
million in 1998, $4.8 million in 1999 and $56,000 in the first quarter of 2000.
We had an accumulated deficit of $33.7 million at December 31, 1999 and an
accumulated deficit of $33.8 million at March 31, 2000.
We expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future, because we
intend to continue investing heavily in the development and marketing of
MeetingPoint and our application hosting services. In February 2000, we
completed the sale of our legacy connectivity products business. In addition, we
expect that revenue from CU-SeeMe will not increase substantially, and may
decrease, during the foreseeable future. We cannot be certain that sales of
MeetingPoint and application hosting services and other new products and
services will offset lost revenue from the sale of our legacy connectivity
products business and declines in revenue from CU-SeeMe in 2000 or in later
years.
OUR QUARTERLY RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE AND CAUSE THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO
FALL.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict and may
fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. If our quarterly revenue or
operating results fall below the expectations of investors or public market
analysts, the price of our common stock could fall substantially. Our quarterly
operating results may vary significantly depending on a number of factors, some
of which are outside of our control. These factors include:
- the timing of the introduction or acceptance of new products offered by us
or our competitors;
- changes in demand for Internet services;
- changes in the mix of products sold by us;
- announcements of new products, services or technologies by us or our
competitors that cause customers to defer or cancel purchases of our
products;
- changes in pricing strategies by us or competitors;
- changes in regulations affecting the multimedia conferencing industry; and
- changes in currency exchange rates.
As a result of these factors, we may not be able to predict our operating
results accurately. In addition, MeetingPoint continues to undergo long
evaluation and sale cycles by potential users. The
5
<PAGE>
lengths of these cycles make it particularly difficult for us to predict the
amount and timing of revenue from this product.
We base our expense levels on our product development plans and our
estimates of future revenue. To a large extent, our expenses are fixed. We may
be unable to adjust our spending in time to compensate for any unexpected
revenue shortfall, thus magnifying the adverse effect of any revenue shortfall.
OUR APPLICATION HOSTING SERVICES MAY NOT ACHIEVE SIGNIFICANT MARKET ACCEPTANCE.
We introduced our application hosting services in the second fiscal quarter
of 2000. Broad acceptance of our application hosting services is critical to our
future success and is subject to a number of significant risks, many of which
are outside of our control. These risks include:
- the ability of our system infrastructure to support large numbers of
concurrent users is unproven;
- corporate users may not be willing to outsource control and management of
their multimedia conferencing to a third party due to possible security,
reliability or other concerns;
- the introduction of competing products and technologies; and
- our dependence on third-party hardware and network providers.
WE FACE INTENSE COMPETITION FROM OTHER INDUSTRY PARTICIPANTS AND MAY NOT BE ABLE
TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY.
The market for Internet communications products and services is extremely
competitive. Because the barriers to entry in the market are relatively low and
the potential market is large, we expect continued growth in the industry and
the entrance of new competitors in the future. Many of our current and potential
competitors, particularly Intel, Microsoft, PictureTel and Ezenia!, have
significantly longer operating histories and significantly greater managerial,
financial, marketing, technical and other competitive resources, as well as
greater name recognition, than we do. As a result, these companies may be able
to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements and may be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and
sale of their conferencing products and services. In addition, to the extent
that competitors choose to bundle competing multimedia conferencing applications
with other products, the demand for our products and services might be
substantially reduced.
As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully with existing or new competitors in the multimedia conferencing
market. We believe that our ability to compete successfully in this market will
depend on a number of factors both within and outside our control, including:
- the adoption and evolution of industry standards;
- the pricing policies of our competitors and suppliers;
- the timing of the introduction of new software products and services by us
and our competitors; and
- our ability to hire and retain highly qualified employees.
To remain competitive in the multimedia conferencing market, we must
continue to invest heavily in research and development and in sales and
marketing. We may not have sufficient resources to make those investments, or we
may not be able to make the technological advances necessary to continue to be
competitive. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or
may establish collaborative relationships among themselves and with third
parties to increase the visibility and utility of their products and services.
Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances may emerge
6
<PAGE>
and rapidly acquire significant market share, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
WE MUST HIRE AND RETAIN SKILLED PERSONNEL IN A COMPETITIVE LABOR MARKET.
Qualified personnel are in great demand throughout the software and Internet
industries. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to attract,
train, motivate and retain highly skilled employees, particularly sales and
marketing personnel, professional services personnel and software engineers. If
we fail to attract and retain the highly trained technical personnel that are
integral to our sales, professional services and product development teams, the
rate at which we can generate sales and develop new products or services may be
limited. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results and financial condition.
IF WE LOSE THE SERVICES OF OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR ANY OTHER KEY MEMBER
OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM, OUR BUSINESS COULD SUFFER.
Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skill, experience
and efforts of Killko Caballero, our chief executive officer, and other key
members of our management team. The loss of any key member of our management
team could have a material adverse effect on our business.
WE RELY ON ONE DISTRIBUTOR FOR A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR TOTAL REVENUE.
Sales to Ingram Micro represented 8% of our total revenue in 1999 and 26% of
our total revenue in 1998. The loss of, or a significant curtailment of
purchases by, Ingram Micro, including a loss or curtailment due to factors
outside of our control, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY.
Our business could be seriously harmed if we are unable to protect
adequately our proprietary software and our other proprietary intellectual
property rights. We may be unable to deter misappropriation of our proprietary
technology, detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our
intellectual property rights. Our competitors could, without violating our
proprietary rights, develop technologies that are as good or better than our
technology.
Some of our multimedia conferencing products are licensed to customers under
"shrink wrap" licenses included as part of the product packaging. In most cases
our shrink wrap licenses are not negotiated with or signed by individual
licensees. Some of the provisions of our shrink wrap licenses, including
provisions limiting our liability and protecting us against unauthorized use,
copying, transfer and disclosure of the licensed program, may be unenforceable
under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Also, we have delivered technical data
and information relating to CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint to the United States
government, and as a result, the United States government may have unlimited
rights to use the technical data and information or to authorize others to use
the technical data and information. We can not assure you that the United States
government will not authorize others to use our technical data and information
for purposes competitive with our products. In addition, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do
laws in the United States.
CLAIMS BY OTHER COMPANIES THAT WE INFRINGE THEIR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY COULD
PREVENT US FROM OFFERING OUR PRODUCTS OR OTHERWISE HURT OUR BUSINESS AND OUR
FINANCIAL CONDITION.
Because the protection of intellectual property rights is often critically
important to the success of companies in the multimedia conferencing industry,
our competitors or others could assert claims that our technologies infringe
their proprietary rights. From time to time, we have received and may receive in
the future notice of claims of infringement of other parties' proprietary
rights. Many participants in the software industry have an increasing number of
patents and have frequently demonstrated a
7
<PAGE>
readiness to commence litigation based on allegations of patent or other
intellectual property infringement. For example, a third party has objected to
our use of the name "MeetingPoint." We may not have the financial resources
necessary to pursue any resulting litigation to a final judgment, and we may not
prevail in any litigation. In defending against such litigation, we could incur
significant legal and other expenses and our management could be distracted from
our principal business operations. If any party making a claim against us were
to prevail in litigation against us, we may have to pay substantial damages. The
court could also grant injunctive or other equitable relief that could prevent
us from offering our products and services without a license or other permission
from others, which may not be available on commercially available terms or at
all. Any of these outcomes could seriously harm our business and our financial
condition.
WE FACE ADDITIONAL RISKS FROM OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.
Our international business involves a number of risks that could hurt our
operating results or contribute to fluctuations in those results. Our revenue
from international sales represented 24% of our total revenue in 1999 and 26% of
our total revenue in 1998. We intend to seek opportunities to expand our product
and service offerings into additional international markets, although we cannot
be certain that we will succeed in developing localized versions of our products
for new international markets or in marketing or distributing products and
services in those markets.
The majority of our international sales are currently denominated in U.S.
dollars, but there can be no assurance that a significantly higher level of
future sales will not be denominated in foreign currencies. To the extent our
sales are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, fluctuations in
exchange rates may render our products less competitive relative to local
product offerings or result in foreign exchange losses. We have no experience in
implementing hedging techniques that might minimize our risks from exchange rate
fluctuations.
Our international business also involves a number of other difficulties and
risks, including risks associated with:
- changing economic conditions in foreign countries;
- export restrictions and export controls relating to technology;
- compliance with existing and changing regulatory requirements;
- tariffs and other trade barriers;
- difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
- longer payment cycles and problems in collecting accounts receivable;
- software piracy;
- political instability;
- seasonal reductions in business activity in Europe and certain other parts
of the world during the summer months; and
- potentially adverse tax consequences.
OUR SOFTWARE PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN UNDETECTED DEFECTS.
Software developed by us or developed by others and incorporated by us into
our products may contain significant undetected errors when first released or as
new versions are released. Although we test our software products before
commercial release, we cannot be certain that errors in the products will not be
found after customers begin to use the software. Any defects in CU-SeeMe or
MeetingPoint, or any future products, may result in significant decreases in
revenue or increases in
8
<PAGE>
expenses because of adverse publicity, reduced orders, product returns,
uncollectible accounts receivable, delays in collecting accounts receivable, and
additional and unexpected costs of further product development to correct the
defects.
OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PARTICIPANTS IN OUR DISTRIBUTION
CHANNELS.
We market our group conferencing products by forming channel relationships
in key markets with major distributors. We also license our group conferencing
products to original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers and
additional distributors for bundling with their products and services. We expect
that our future success will depend in large part upon these original equipment
manufacturers, value-added resellers and distributors. The performance of these
original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers and distributors is
outside our control, and we are unable to predict the extent to which these
organizations will be successful in marketing and selling our group conferencing
products or products incorporating our group conferencing products. We cannot
assure you that we will be successful in establishing relationships with
original equipment manufacturers, value-added resellers and distributors, and if
we fail, our business could be seriously harmed.
Our distributors typically carry the products of some of our competitors.
The distributors have limited capital to invest in inventory, and their
decisions to purchase our products and, in the case of retail stores, to give
them critical shelf space, are partly a function of pricing, terms and special
promotions offered by our competitors, which we cannot predict or control.
We distribute certain of our products directly over the Internet. By
distributing our products over the Internet, we may increase the likelihood of
unauthorized copying and use of our software.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND LEGAL UNCERTAINTIES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
The application of existing laws to the Internet is uncertain and may take
years to resolve, particularly with respect to property ownership, user privacy,
freedom of expression, pricing, characteristics and quality of products and
services, taxation, advertising, intellectual property rights, information
security and the convergence of traditional telecommunications services with
Internet communications. Because the Internet is becoming increasingly popular,
various foreign or domestic governmental bodies may seek to adopt laws and
control use of the Internet. We cannot predict the nature of any such laws.
Legislation could subject us or our customers to potential liability or could
decrease the growth of the Internet, either of which could have an adverse
effect on our business.
In March 1996, ACTA, a group of telecommunications common carriers, filed
the ACTA Petition with the FCC, arguing that providers of computer software
products that enable voice transmission over the Internet ("Internet telephone"
services), such as us, are operating as common carriers without complying with
various regulatory requirements and without paying certain charges required by
law. The ACTA Petition argues that the FCC has the authority to regulate both
the Internet and the providers of "Internet telephone" services and requests
that the FCC declare its authority over interstate and international
telecommunications services using the Internet, initiate rulemaking proceedings
to consider rules governing the use of the Internet for the provision of
telecommunications services, and order providers of "Internet telephone"
services software to immediately cease the sale of such software pending such
rulemaking. Certain parties have filed comments with the FCC regarding the ACTA
Petition. We are unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding. In December
1996, the FCC stated that it intended to address the legal questions raised by
the ACTA Petition in a future proceeding but has not yet done so. ACTA has
submitted petitions, similar to its FCC filing, to certain state regulators,
including public service commissions. Any action by the FCC or state regulators
to grant the relief sought by ACTA or otherwise to regulate use of the Internet
as a medium of communication, including any action to permit local exchange
carriers to impose additional charges for connections used for Internet access,
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
9
<PAGE>
WE MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL CAPITAL.
We may need to raise additional capital in order to fund the development and
marketing of our products and services. Although we expect our cash and cash
equivalents to provide us with sufficient working capital through at least the
first fiscal quarter of 2001, our current plans and projections may prove to be
inaccurate or our expected cash flow may prove to be insufficient to fund our
operations because of product delays, unanticipated expenses or other unforeseen
difficulties. Our ability to obtain additional financing will depend on a number
of factors, including market conditions, our operating performance and investor
interest. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms and conditions of any
financing unattractive. They may also result in our incurring additional
indebtedness or accepting stockholder dilution. If adequate funds are not
available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may have to forego
strategic acquisitions or investments, defer our development activities, or
delay our introduction of new products and services. Any of these actions may
seriously harm our business and operating results.
THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK HAS BEEN EXTREMELY VOLATILE.
The market price of our common stock has been extremely volatile in the
past, and may be expected to be volatile in the future for many reasons,
including:
- actual or anticipated variations in our revenue and operating results;
- announcements of the development of improved technology;
- changes in estimates of our financial performance, or the absence of
coverage, by securities analysts;
- conditions and trends in the Internet and multimedia conferencing
industries;
- adoption of new accounting standards; and
- general market conditions.
Recently the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations that have dramatically affected the market prices of the stocks of
many technology companies, particularly companies associated with the Internet.
These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the
operating performance of those companies. These factors may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
VOLATILITY IN OUR STOCK PRICE MAY LEAD TO LITIGATION AGAINST US.
Stockholders frequently commence securities class action litigation against
a company after a significant decrease in the company's stock price. If our
stock price drops and our stockholders commence litigation against us, we could
incur significant legal and other expenses defending the litigation and our
management could be distracted from our principal business operations. Either of
these outcomes could seriously harm our business.
DELAWARE LAW AND OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS CONTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER AND INDEMNIFICATION
PROVISIONS THAT MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR STOCK.
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and our charter and
by-laws contain provisions that might enable our management to resist a takeover
of our company. These provisions might discourage, delay or prevent a change in
the control of our company or a change in our management. These provisions could
also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other
stockholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. The existence
of these provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay
in the future for shares of our common stock.
10
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
All of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are being
offered by the selling stockholders. For information about the selling
stockholders, see "Principal and Selling Stockholders." We will not receive any
proceeds from sales of these shares. We received approximately $20 million from
the sale of those shares to the selling stockholders in private placements
completed in December 1999.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We
currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings, if any, to fund the
development and growth of our business, and therefore we do not expect to pay
any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends, if
any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors after taking into
account various factors, including our financial condition, results of
operations, current and anticipated cash needs, and plans for expansion.
PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq National Market on
October 11, 1996 under the symbol "WPNE." Our common stock began trading on the
Nasdaq National Market on May 15, 2000 under our new symbol "CUSM." The
following table sets forth the high and low sales price for the common stock for
each quarter during the past two years, the first quarter of 2000 and the second
quarter of 2000 to date, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
1998:
First Quarter......................................... $3.3125 $2.00
Second Quarter........................................ 3.5625 1.375
Third Quarter......................................... 2.3125 .7812
Fourth Quarter........................................ 2.75 .75
1999:
First Quarter......................................... 4.3438 1.875
Second Quarter........................................ 9.4375 3.125
Third Quarter......................................... 7.875 4.00
Fourth Quarter........................................ 29.625 6.625
2000:
First Quarter......................................... 49.625 18.875
Second Quarter (through June 22, 2000)................ 37.00 7.75
</TABLE>
As of June 14, 2000, there were 168 holders of record of common stock who
held an aggregate of 12,214,169 shares of common stock as nominees for an
undisclosed number of beneficial holders.
11
<PAGE>
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of March 31, 2000. The
following table should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, 2000
------------------
(IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<S> <C>
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding............. --
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 12,191,480 shares issued and outstanding.... $ 122
Additional paid-in capital................................ 63,018
Deferred stock compensation............................... (356)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (33,767)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... 71
-------
Total stockholders' equity............................ $29,088
=======
</TABLE>
12
<PAGE>
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following financial data for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999,
and as of December 31, 1999, are derived from our consolidated financial
statements audited by Ernst & Young LLP and appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. Financial data for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997
are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in
this prospectus. Financial data for the three months ended April 2, 1999 and
March 31, 2000 are derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The financial data should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical results are not
necessarily indicative of operating results to be expected in the future.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------- THREE MONTHS ENDED
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 APRIL 2, 1999 MARCH 31, 2000
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------------- ---------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Revenue:
Software license fees................. $ 6,018 $10,500 $ 9,797 $ 6,948 $10,715 $ 2,186 $ 3,595
Services and other.................... 1,166 1,166 1,255 845 1,287 273 497
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenue....................... 7,184 11,666 11,052 7,793 12,002 2,459 4,092
Cost of revenue......................... 1,247 2,212 1,890 1,645 2,548 514 992
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit............................ 5,937 9,454 9,162 6,148 9,454 1,945 3,100
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing................... 2,517 6,632 7,939 7,739 7,266 1,598 1,869
Research and development.............. 1,866 3,819 5,722 5,042 4,760 1,177 1,350
General and administrative............ 2,000 2,793 2,586 2,278 2,359 515 952
Write-off of purchased research and
development costs................... 3,200 -- -- -- -- -- --
Restructuring......................... -- -- 661 -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses............ 9,583 13,244 16,908 15,059 14,385 3,290 4,171
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) from operations........... (3,646) (3,790) (7,746) (8,911) (4,931) (1,345) (1,071)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Other income (expense):
Interest income....................... 82 251 1,037 577 178 70 254
Gain from asset sale.................. -- -- -- -- -- -- 776
Other, net............................ 68 (20) (110) (85) (96) (29) (15)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Other income, net................... 150 231 927 492 82 41 1,015
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes.......................... (3,496) (3,559) (6,819) (8,419) (4,849) (1,304) (56)
Provision for income taxes.............. 30 78 7 5 -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss................................ $(3,526) $(3,637) $(6,826) $(8,424) $(4,849) $(1,304) $ (56)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted net loss per share.... $ (0.65) $ (0.55) $ (0.75) $ (0.86) $ (0.46) $ (0.12) $ (0.00)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Basic and diluted weighted average
shares outstanding.................... 5,451 6,618 9,148 9,798 10,620 10,480 12,086
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1999 MARCH 31, 2000
------------------ ---------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $22,088 $21,561
Working capital............................................. 22,943 24,005
Total assets................................................ 32,047 33,172
Long-term debt, net current portion......................... -- --
Total stockholders' equity.................................. 27,772 29,088
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We develop software solutions that facilitate worldwide video and audio
communication and data collaboration across the Internet, intranets, extranets
and other networks using the Internet protocol. Our CU-SeeMe Web provides the
industry's first multipoint video instant messaging over the Internet. Our
CU-SeeMe Pro and MeetingPoint create a client-server solution that allows
multiple users to participate simultaneously in conferences over the Internet.
ClassPoint is a MeetingPoint add-on that provides a complete solution for
corporate training and distance learning. We support multiple platforms,
including Windows 95, 98 and NT, Sun Solaris, and Red Hat Linux. In
February 2000, we sold the assets of our legacy connectivity business to
Powerlan USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Powerlan Limited, an Australian
company. We can be found on the World Wide Web at WWW.CUSEEME.COM. CU-SeeMe Web
can be experienced at WWW.CUSEEMEWORLD.COM.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth operating data expressed as percentages of
total revenue for each period indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------------ ---------------------------------
1997 1998 1999 APRIL 2, 1999 MARCH 31, 2000
-------- -------- -------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Software license fees................ 88.6% 89.2% 89.3% 88.9% 87.8%
Services and other................... 11.4 10.8 10.7 11.1 12.2
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total revenue...................... 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cost of revenue........................ 17.1 21.1 21.2 20.9 24.2
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross profit........................... 82.9 78.9 78.8 79.1 75.8
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.................. 71.8 99.3 60.5 65.0 45.7
Research and development............. 51.8 64.7 39.7 47.9 33.0
General and administrative........... 23.4 29.2 19.7 20.9 23.3
Restructuring........................ 6.0 -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total operating expenses........... 153.0 193.2 119.9 133.8 102.0
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Loss from operations................... (70.1) (114.3) (41.1) (54.7) (26.2)
Other income (expense)................. 8.4 6.3 0.7 1.7 24.8
Provision for income taxes............. (0.1) (0.1) -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net loss............................... (61.8)% (108.1)% (40.4)% (53.0)% (1.4)%
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 2, 1999
REVENUE
Total revenue increased by 66% to $4,092,000 in the three months ended March
31, 2000 from $2,459,000 in the three months ended April 2, 1999. The growth was
primarily due to (a) a 97% increase in conferencing server revenues, which grew
to $1,880,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $954,000 in the
corresponding quarter of the prior year, and (b) conferencing client revenues
which increased 85% to $1,764,000 from $954,000 in the comparable quarter of the
prior year. Conferencing client revenue growth was due to both the release of
CU-SeeMe Web, our browser-based client, which began shipping in March 2000, and
shipment of our camera bundle.
14
<PAGE>
The increases in revenue were offset in part by the curtailment of legacy
connectivity revenues in the current year, due to the sale of the legacy
connectivity product lines in February 2000. Legacy connectivity revenue in the
three months ended March 31, 2000 was $101,000 compared with $534,000 in the
corresponding quarter of prior year. This represented January and February
revenues generated before the legacy connectivity product line was sold to
Powerlan USA.
COST OF REVENUE
Cost of revenue consists principally of royalties and associated
amortization of paid license fees relating to third-party software included in
our products, and costs of cameras, product media, manuals, packaging materials,
product localization for international markets, duplication and shipping.
Cost of revenue was 24% of total revenue in the three months ended
March 31, 2000 and 21% for the quarter ended April 2,1999. The increase in cost
was largely attributable to technical support costs of $186,000, or 4.5%, which
is now included in cost of sales as opposed to operating expenses where it has
been traditionally reported. This change reflects the fact that technical
support is now significantly tied to revenue, compared to prior years when
support was frequently provided for no charge or for freeware product. The
increase was due in lesser part to additional costs of $73,000 relating to the
applications service provider, or ASP, business which we launched in the second
quarter of 2000. These increases in costs were partially offset by higher video
conferencing margins of 84% versus 78% in the comparable period of the prior
year, driven by sales of the higher-margin CU-Web.
SALES AND MARKETING
Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of costs associated with
sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, trade shows, advertising and
promotional materials. Sales and marketing expense increased by 17% to
$1,869,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2000 from $1,598,000 in the
comparable period in the prior year. The increase in sales and marketing expense
in the first three months of 2000 was driven primarily by increased headcount
and associated expenses, marketing programs, and commission expense on higher
sales volumes. The increase was partially offset by the exclusion of technical
support expense of $186,000 in the first three months of 2000. Technical support
expense was included in cost of revenue as of the first three months of 2000, as
customers are now charged for all support calls.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expense consists primarily of costs of personnel
and equipment. Research and development expense increased by 15% to $1,350,000
in the three months ended March 31, 2000, from $1,177,000 in the comparable
period in the previous year. The quarter-to-quarter increase was primarily due
to increased headcount in the three months ended March 31, 2000 due to hiring to
support the proposed ASP business. Total research and development headcount was
46 on March 31, 2000, as compared to 39 on April 2, 1999.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expense consists of administrative, financial and
general management activities, including legal, accounting and other
professional fees. General and administrative expense increased by 85% to
$952,000 from $515,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2000. This increase
was due to headcount additions in management information systems, salary
adjustments, increased legal expense, and consulting fees.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
Provision for income taxes consists of federal alternative minimum taxes and
state and foreign income taxes. We recorded no tax provision in the three months
ended March 31, 2000 and April 2, 1999.
15
<PAGE>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
REVENUE
Total revenue increased by 54% to $12,002,000 in 1999 from $7,793,000 in
1998.
Revenue from conferencing software increased by 69% to $9,783,000 in 1999
from $5,781,000 in 1998. This increase resulted largely from a 93% increase in
MeetingPoint sales from $2,947,000 in 1998 to $5,684,000 in 1999. The increase
in MeetingPoint sales is attributable primarily to a higher average selling
price, resulting from a higher ratio of direct sales versus distributor sales,
increased sales of add-on functionality such as Continuous Presence, and
increased sales of higher port-count servers. In addition, CUSeeMe client sales
of $4,099,000 in 1999 represented a 45% increase over the previous year. The
CU-SeeMe revenue increase is due in part to significantly higher sales of the
CU-SeeMe camera bundle during the December holiday season.
Our legacy connectivity product sales continued to decline as we focused
fewer resources on these older product lines. Legacy connectivity revenue
declined by 17% to $1,844,000 in 1999 from $2,226,000 in 1998. The percentage of
total revenue represented by revenue from legacy connectivity products decreased
to 15% in 1999 from 29% in 1998. On February 29, 2000, we sold the assets of the
legacy connectivity business to Powerlan USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Powerlan Limited. We received $1,000,000 in cash and 467,730 ordinary shares of
Powerlan Limited as consideration for the sale.
Maintenance revenue increased 86% to $1,275,000 in 1999 from $686,000 in
1998 in conjunction with the growth in server conferencing revenue.
Revenue from sales outside the United States comprised 24% of total revenue
in 1999 and 26% of total revenue in 1998. See "Risk Factors--We face additional
risks from our international operations."
Sales to Ingram Micro represented 8% of total revenue in 1999 and 26% of
total revenue in 1998. See "Risk Factors--We rely on one distributor for a
significant portion of our total revenue."
COST OF REVENUE
Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue was 21% for both 1999 and
1998.
In May 1997, we renegotiated the terms of the license agreement to provide
for a $1,000,000 prepayment of royalties in exchange for a decrease in the level
of revenue-based royalties payable to the Cornell Research Foundation. The
renegotiated terms were retroactive to January 1, 1997, and we remained subject
to minimum royalty payments. In the fourth fiscal quarter of 1998, we acquired
the Cornell Research Foundation's trademark and other intellectual property
rights in CU-SeeMe, upon which our current versions of CU-SeeMe are based, and
the related server technology, which underlies MeetingPoint. The purchase price
for these rights consisted of (1) a note in the principal amount of $900,000, of
which $300,000 is due on each of June 30, 2000, June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2002,
and (2) warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock at a price of
$1.00 per share. The warrants were issued in exchange for outstanding warrants
issued previously to the Cornell Research Foundation; these prior warrants had
an exchange price of $6.00 per share but otherwise had terms substantially
identical to those of the new warrants. As a result of this acquisition, we are
no longer required to pay any royalties to the Cornell Research Foundation. See
"Business--Proprietary Rights."
We intend to continue our strategy of improving the features and
functionality of our products, particularly MeetingPoint and future products
incorporating MeetingPoint technology, through the incorporation of third-party
software. As a result, the cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue may
fluctuate in the future.
SALES AND MARKETING
Sales and marketing expense decreased by 6% to $7,265,000 in 1999 from
$7,739,000 in 1998, and decreased as a percentage of total revenue to 61% in
1999 from 99% in 1998. The decrease in sales and marketing expense in 1999 was
primarily attributable to decreased marketing programs.
16
<PAGE>
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expense decreased by 6% to $4,761,000 in 1999 from
$5,042,000 in 1998. Research and development expense decreased as a percentage
of total revenue to 40% in 1999 from 65% in 1998. The decrease in research and
development expense was attributable primarily to lower headcount and consulting
support.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expense increased by 4% to $2,359,000 in 1999
from $2,278,000 in 1998. It represented 20% of total revenue in 1999 and 29% of
total revenue in 1998. The dollar increase in general and administrative expense
was due primarily to a one-time $240,000 reversal of a portion of a legal
reserve in 1998.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
We recorded no tax provision in 1999 and $5,000 in 1998. At December 31,
1999, we had cumulative federal net operating loss carryforwards of $26,848,000.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
REVENUE
Total revenue decreased by 30% to $7,793,000 in 1998 from $11,052,000 in
1997.
Revenue from conferencing software decreased by 9% to $5,781,000 in 1998
from $6,369,000 in 1997. This decrease resulted from a 41% decline in revenue
from client conferencing software, which decreased to $2,833,000 in 1998 from
$4,777,000 in 1997. The decline in client conferencing revenue was offset in
part by an 85% increase in revenue from server conferencing software, which grew
to $2,948,000 in 1998 from $1,592,000 in 1997. The growth in server conferencing
revenue principally resulted from the release of MeetingPoint in November 1997
and ClassPoint in April 1998. The growth rate of server conferencing revenue has
been determined in part by product performance and customer acceptance and
adoption.
Our legacy connectivity product sales continued to decline as we focused
fewer resources on these older product lines. Legacy connectivity revenue
declined by 43% to $2,226,000 in 1998 from $3,880,000 in 1997. The percentage of
total revenue represented by revenue from legacy connectivity products decreased
to 29% in 1998 from 35% in 1997. Maintenance and other revenue decreased in
conjunction with the decline in legacy connectivity revenue, as the majority of
maintenance agreements historically related to legacy connectivity products.
Revenue from sales outside the United States comprised 26% of total revenue
in 1998 and 27% of total revenue in 1997.
Sales to Ingram Micro represented 26% and 14% of our total revenue in each
of 1998 and 1997. In addition, sales to Tech Data represented 14% of our total
revenue in 1997.
COST OF REVENUE
Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue increased to 21% in 1998 as
compared to 17% in 1997. The percentage increase resulted primarily from the
increased sales volume of lower-margin servers as compared with higher-margin
legacy connectivity products and, to a lesser extent, increased sales of
lower-margin camera bundles in the fourth fiscal quarter of 1998.
SALES AND MARKETING
Sales and marketing expense decreased by 3% to $7,739,000 in 1998 from
$7,939,000 in 1997, and increased as a percentage of total revenue to 99% in
1998 from 72% in 1997. The dollar decrease in
17
<PAGE>
sales and marketing expense in 1998 was primarily attributable to decreased
advertising, offset in part by increases in sales headcount and travel expense.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development expense decreased by 12% to $5,042,000 in 1998 from
$5,722,000 in 1997. Research and development expense represented 65% of total
revenue for 1998 and 52% of total revenue for 1997. The dollar decrease in
research and development expense was attributable primarily to reduced headcount
and consulting support, as well as limited software supply spending. A
company-wide restructuring in June 1997 reduced the number of research and
development personnel, cost benefits of which were fully realized in 1998.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative expense decreased by 12% to $2,278,000 in 1998
from $2,586,000 in 1997. It represented 29% of total revenue in 1998 and 23% of
total revenue in 1997. The dollar decrease in general and administrative expense
was due primarily to reduced headcount, consolidation of operations conducted at
our office in La Gaude, France, decreased legal fees, and a one-time $240,000
reversal of a portion of a legal reserve.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGE
In the second fiscal quarter of 1997, we reorganized our operations and
recorded a restructuring charge in the amount of $661,000 as a result of a
change in senior management and a reduction in our workforce. This amount
consisted primarily of severance payments, outplacement expense, and related
fees for 26 employees who were laid off at the quarter end. The reorganization
reflected our decision to focus our resources on our Web-based conferencing and
connectivity products, and to terminate support, development and sales of
certain older product lines.
In the third fiscal quarter of 1998, we reduced our total headcount by ten
persons, of whom seven were engaged in research and development, one in general
and administration activities, and two in marketing. There was no restructuring
charge recorded as a result of this transaction, and severance payments were
charged to their respective operating expense line items. Severance payments
outstanding at December 31, 1998 were immaterial.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
We recorded a tax provision of $5,000 for 1998 and $7,000 for 1997.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We used cash of $527,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2000, as
compared with $1,847,000 cash used in the three months ended April 2, 1999. Cash
used in the three months ended March 31, 2000 was comprised predominantly of the
net loss of $56,000, an increase in accounts receivables of $933,000, purchase
of property of equipment of $742,000, and $500,000 used in general operations,
offset in large part by $1,000,000 in cash generated from the sale of the legacy
connectivity product line in February 2000 and $667,000 from stock option
exercises. In the three months ended April 2, 1999 cash used consisted largely
of $1,304,000 in net loss, a final cash outlay of $233,000 related to our
acquisition of T.120 technology and H.323 stack source code, $100,000 in
property and equipment purchases, and $150,000 in royalty payments.
We generated $15,667,000 of cash in 1999, as compared with using $8,283,000
of cash in 1998. Cash generated in 1999 was comprised largely of $20,000,000 in
gross proceeds from our private placement of common stock in December 1999,
partially offset by our net loss of $4,850,000 and the net increase in accounts
receivable of $2,033,000.
In four private placements of $5,000,000 each in December 1999, CFE, Inc. (a
wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation), Private Equity
Holding (Cayman) Ltd., Altamira Management Ltd., and Special Situations funds
(Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., Special Situations Cayman Fund,
L.P., and Special Situations Fund III, L.P.) each purchased 325,521 shares at a
18
<PAGE>
price of $15.36 per share. The price was based on a 30-day weighted average at
the time the terms were negotiated.
At March 31, 2000, we had cash and cash equivalents of $21,561,000 and
working capital of $24,005,000. We believe that our current cash and cash
equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations and capital expenditures
through at least the first fiscal quarter of 2001. Thereafter, our liquidity
will be materially dependent on our internally generated funds and our ability
to obtain funds from additional equity or debt financings from external sources.
We continue to experience a negative cash flow from operations in each fiscal
quarter. Our capital requirements may vary materially from those we now
anticipate, depending on a number of factors including:
- the expansion of our facility and Service Operations Center and related
staffing;
- the level of our research and development activities;
- the rate of market acceptance of our software offerings; and
- the success of our sales, marketing and distribution strategy.
If we do not meet our goals with respect to revenue or if our costs are
higher than anticipated, substantial additional funds may be required.
INFLATION
Although certain of our expenses increase with general inflation in the
economy, inflation has not had a material impact on our financial condition or
results of operations to date.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ACCOUNTING FOR
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES ("SFAS 133"), requires companies
to record derivatives on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities, measured at
fair value. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of those
derivatives would be accounted for depending on the use of the derivative and
whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. SFAS 133 is effective for our fiscal
year ending December 31, 2001. The adoption of SFAS 133 is not expected to have
a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation, an Interpretation of APB No. 25". The Interpretation will be
applied prospectively to new awards, modifications to outstanding awards, and
changes in employee status on or after July 1, 2000, except in certain
circumstances. We are evaluating the impact this interpretation will have on our
financial position and results of operations.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, REVENUE RECOGNITION IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The
SAB formalizes positions the staff has expressed in speeches and comment
letters. SAB 101 is effective no later than the second fiscal quarter of the
fiscal year beginning after December 15, 1999. We are presently analyzing the
impact, if any, that the adherence to SAB 101 will have on our financial
condition or results of operations.
19
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
We develop software solutions that facilitate worldwide video and audio
communication and data collaboration across the Internet, intranets, extranets
and other networks using the Internet protocol. Our CU-SeeMe Web product
provides the industry's first multipoint video instant messaging over the
Internet. Our CU-SeeMe Pro and MeetingPoint create a client-server solution that
allows multiple users to participate simultaneously in conferences over the
Internet. ClassPoint is a MeetingPoint add-on that provides a complete solution
for corporate training and distance learning. We support multiple platforms,
including Windows 95, 98 and NT, Sun Solaris, and Red Hat Linux. Our web site is
located at WWW.CUSEEME.COM. CU-SeeMe Web can be experienced at
WWW.CUSEEMEWORLD.COM. Information contained in our web site is not a part of
this prospectus.
We have established our company as a leader in visual communications
technology. We offer technologies such as streaming media integration and a
Web-based client that we believe are not offered by any other provider today.
Our CU-SeeMe client is widely distributed, and we believe that there is strong
brand equity in the CU-SeeMe name.
We intend to capitalize on these attributes by targeting increased
distribution of our client software, which will ultimately create additional
demand for MeetingPoint servers. Targeting Internet service providers, portal
sites, and enterprises, we will either sell a complete end-to-end solution for
visual communications or sell visual communications services whereby the
customer pays a recurring fee to video/audio-enable and maintain their web site.
As the Internet continues to evolve from an information exchange to an
integrated communications medium, we believe our technology can help facilitate
this transition by providing visual communications on demand that are simple
enough for the average Internet user to engage, and powerful enough to provide
robust functionality for web-based businesses.
OUR CU-SEEME WEB/MEETINGPOINT SOLUTION
Our CU-SeeMe Web technology, introduced in October 1999, enables live audio,
video and text chat to be embedded in a standard web browser. CU-SeeMe Web
facilitates on-demand Visual Instant Messaging, web-based videochat, live
interactive web events, and face-to-face, on-line call centers for e-commerce
and support services.
With CU-SeeMe Web, we believe that Internet portals and web sites can
customize their web pages with new interactive features that will attract more
visitors to their sites and keep them there for longer periods of time. Internet
service providers, or ISPs, and applications service providers, or ASPs, can
offer a broad range of value-added services to their enterprise and consumer
customers. E-commerce sites can offer live, personalized assistance to buyers
while they are in the process of shopping online. CU-SeeMe Web gives Internet
web sites a new set of tools to grow membership, create online communications,
increase revenue streams, and offer services that have not previously been
available. As portal sites deploy CU-SeeMe Web to enhance the communications
capabilities of their sites, we believe that consumers will adopt visual
communications on the Internet as an accepted medium. This will accelerate all
forms of visual communications as mainstream Internet applications.
Portals and businesses with a strong Internet presence are constantly
engaged in activities to bring consumers to their sites and keep them there
longer. CU-SeeMe Web allows these sites to create interactive communities for
sharing information about their products and services through live videochat
experiences. CU-SeeMe Web allows Internet businesses to provide community-based
videochat inside a browser window of their design.
Instant Messaging and e-mail have become powerful services provided by
Internet portals to add value to their sites and keep consumers coming back.
Video Instant Messaging provides a new
20
<PAGE>
enhancement to this accepted Internet activity by adding audio and video to the
Instant Message experience. The product provides innovative web developers with
the flexibility of choice as Instant Messaging becomes embedded into new
Internet applications. CU-SeeMe Web allows Internet call centers to be developed
that enable interactive two-way communications over the Internet, including
two-way visual communications. Product demonstrations, personalized customer
service, interactive press and analyst briefings, and employment interviews are
a few of the many applications for CU-SeeMe Web. The consumer is automatically
connected, visually, audibly, and with text-based chat simply by clicking on a
browser button. For sites that host text-based chat rooms today, CU-SeeMe Web
offers the possibility to enhance the user experience and add a new dimension of
communication with video and audio. CU-SeeMe Web provides significant
differentiation from other companies that offer only text chat or text and audio
interaction over the Internet. Visitors can access a page that is CU-SeeMe
Web-enabled using either Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer.
Users can access live video and audio without having any related software
previously installed on their machines.
Should the end user decide to upgrade from CU-SeeMe Web into a more
feature-rich client software, we provide CU-SeeMe Pro for sale over our web site
and in retail stores. CU-SeeMe Pro offers the user the additional features of
H.323 standards compliance, integrated desktop application sharing, a flexible
user interface, a Conference Companion that simplifies storing and retrieving
contact information, and additional audio and visual enhancements.
CU-SeeMe Web integrates with our MeetingPoint conference server, which
provides many of the back-end functions needed for applications like videochat,
collaboration, IP call centers, Internet event management, and other multipoint
applications. MeetingPoint also enables back-end services like call transfer,
queuing, and agent log-in and management. MeetingPoint allows for additional
innovation on the site. For example, a small group of people could participate
interactively with CU-SeeMe Web in a live event, while the entire event could be
streamed out to a large number of viewers using MeetingPoint's Streaming Media
integration technology.
MeetingPoint, the software-only server component of our multimedia
conferencing solution, allows users of CU-SeeMe to participate in multipoint,
multimedia conferences with a nearly unlimited number of users. Administrators
create and host conferences using MeetingPoint. End users then connect to the
conference, using either CU-SeeMe or any other third-party H.323 compliant
multimedia conferencing client product. MeetingPoint's core "multimedia router"
technology enables the group interaction to take place by "routing" it to the
other conference participants. MeetingPoint solves the complex problem of
enabling real-time multipoint communication over the Internet between users
operating at different connection speeds without degrading the quality of the
entire conference to that of the slowest connection speed.
MeetingPoint, introduced in November 1997, was the industry's first H.323
compliant multimedia conferencing server. MeetingPoint's software-only
architecture makes it scalable and deployable over a variety of hardware
platforms and operating systems, including Windows NT, Solaris and RedHat Linux.
MeetingPoint is the only software-only conferencing server currently available
on a UNIX platform.
MeetingPoint is able to manage the amount of network resources that are
consumed as it hosts a group conference. We believe that the use of Internet
protocol-based networks for real-time communication is beginning a phase of
significant growth, with thousands of new users every day and creative new
applications being discovered weekly. However, multimedia requires significant
bandwidth. While emerging technologies like Fast Ethernet, ADSL and high-speed
cable modems promise expanded bandwidth in the near future, today most users
face network constraints. Home users, for example, are often limited to 28.8
Kbps modem connections. Business, governmental and educational enterprises may
have 10 Mbps modem local area networks, but these are used for a variety of
traditional, mission-critical applications such as file sharing, e-mail and
printing. Even network service providers are challenged to stretch their network
resources to cover rapidly growing customer traffic. In those rare instances
where bandwidth is plentiful, it typically comes at a relatively high cost,
especially
21
<PAGE>
for wide area network links. Because of these network constraints,
MeetingPoint's bandwidth management capability allows users to make the most of
the new collaboration, entertainment and learning possibilities that
network-based multimedia communications create, without having to make expensive
upgrades to their existing network infrastructure.
OUR APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SOLUTION
We believe that certain ISPs, portal sites, and enterprises would like to
offer visual communications services, but are unwilling to take on the added
burden of infrastructure costs, technology training, and resource allocation
necessary to deploy these services well. Part of our strategy is to accelerate
broadscale deployment and facilitate site adoption of our technology by
providing customers with the services necessary to get them up and running, and
keep them running reliably and smoothly.
We plan to assist our customers with our technology deployments,
MeetingPoint-specific systems integration services, network design, and
MeetingPoint server installation and configuration. Hosting of conferencing
services will be provided on shared or dedicated MeetingPoint servers, providing
greater scalability and flexibility than the customer could provide on its own.
Our ASP will provide a full suite of Internet communications services, enabling
our customers to provide community managment, directory services, point-to-point
calls, broadcast and server-based conferencing. These services are ideally
suited for enterprise customers; however, ISPs and portal sites interested in
hosting their own sites can also benefit from our deployment assistance.
Our ASP business can be divided into two discrete offerings: Hosting
Services and Professional Services.
HOSTING SERVICES
We introduced our hosting services in the second fiscal quarter of 2000. Our
hosting services enable the customer to offer video/audio-enhanced applications
leveraging our back-end infrastructure and service operations center, or SOC.
The customer can realize greater economies of scale by utilizing our shared
server hosting model and forgoing the actual purchase of MeetingPoint
conferencing servers and necessary supporting infrastructure. The SOC will serve
as our interface with the network operation functions provided by our outsourced
network partner, as well as provide the customer with monitoring and analytical
functions as follows:
- application and performance monitoring, configuration and support;
- primary interface to the customer site via a secure browser;
- trouble ticket and ticket status reporting, application configuration,
application monitoring, and electronic help;
- traditional dial-in support, staffed 24 hours every day; and
- real-time monitoring of customer's web site in an effort to prevent and
curtail inappropriate behavior and maintain secure, G-rated sites for a
customer's subscribers.
Hosting services will be offered for both our proprietary technologies and
other supported technologies. Our ASP will provide communications services from
PC to PC and from PC to telephone, on both a one-to-one and a group basis.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Our Professional Services unit will offer the customer an integrated service
plan, regardless of the customer's intention to self-host or outsource hosting.
Professional Services will provide ongoing or periodic support for the
following:
- hardware deployment;
22
<PAGE>
- software deployment, including engineering support to optimize the
customer's network to render it audio- and video-enabled;
- network management of customer-hosted services through the SOC (regardless
of whose network the operations are deployed on);
- ongoing status monitoring (hardware failure, software usage, saturation
forecasting, ongoing maintenance and support, and extranet interface
reporting); and
- capacity management.
We have secured our first network operations center, or NOC, from where the
majority of these services will be deployed and begun the buildout necessary to
render the facility operational.
OUR PORTAL SITE SOLUTION
In an effort to expose the Internet community to the positive and highly
adaptable concept of Internet communications, we have launched our own
communications portal site, CUSeeMe World. The site enables anyone with Internet
access the opportunity to "click to videochat" by downloading a thin CU-SeeMe
Web client and initiating video and audio communication immediately, either in a
preconfigured topic-specific chat room or a customized chat room created by the
user. The site is designed to not only expose the average user to video
communications, but to present ISPs and portal sites with proof of concept for
their own anticipated communications deployments. An important aspect of the
site is its ability to draw users into the online communication experience,
without the prerequisites of purchasing software or hardware. The user needs no
special software or hardware to participate; users without cameras can readily
text- and audio-chat with, as well as see, users with cameras. We believe that
many users choose to purchase a camera after experiencing the CUSeeMe World
site. The site offers free membership to users, and is sponsored by a number of
topic-specific web sites.
STRATEGY
Our objective is to be the leading supplier of software solutions that
facilitate worldwide video and audio communication and data collaboration across
the Internet. To achieve this objective, we are implementing the following
strategies:
MAINTAIN TECHNOLOGICAL LEADERSHIP. Since 1996, we have developed and
introduced leading-edge visual communications technology for the Internet.
Products such as CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint have won numerous industry awards for
their market-leading technology. We intend to extend our leadership position by
continuing to invest in research and development and to build upon our existing
technology.
DRIVE MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF OUR APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER
CAPABILITIES. We believe that a number of potential users of Internet-based
visual communications services are hesitant to make the significant
infrastructure and training investment viewed as necessary to deploy and support
these services. We believe that our introduction of hosting services and related
professional services will ease the implementation of Internet-based visual
communications services for customers such as ISPs, portal sites and
enterprises. We intend to increase market awareness and acceptance of our
software products, such as CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint, through the introduction
of our hosting services and professional services in the second fiscal quarter
of 2000.
EXPAND MARKET PENETRATION OF MEETINGPOINT. We believe our future success
will depend significantly on our ability to market MeetingPoint. We believe that
opportunities exist to market MeetingPoint to Internet service providers,
corporations and other entities seeking to enable and promote multimedia group
conferencing. We believe that our leadership position in this market space has
positioned us to achieve revenue growth as the H.323 market matures and expands.
23
<PAGE>
CONTINUE TO DEVELOP PORTFOLIO OF PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY. Our success
depends heavily upon our proprietary technology. Through several transactions,
such as our purchase of T.120 whiteboard and data collaboration technology from
Labtam Communications and our acquisition of trademark, source code and other
intellectual property rights related to the CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint
technologies from Cornell Research Foundation, we have significantly
strengthened our proprietary technology. We intent to continue to develop
proprietary technology internally through our research and development efforts,
as well as to continue to seek selected opportunities to acquire intellectual
property rights from third parties.
PRODUCTS
INTERNET COMMUNICATIONS
Our multimedia conferencing products, CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint, provide a
real-time, multipoint video and audio communication and data solution over the
Internet, intranets, extranets and other networks using the Internet protocol.
By developing multimedia conferencing products that require no proprietary
hardware, we are able to offer multimedia conferencing at a substantially lower
price than vendors of traditional hardware-based systems, thereby encouraging
businesses and others to adopt it as a mass communication medium. Our CU-SeeMe
product has afforded our company brand name recognition, an installed base and a
time-to-market advantage over other vendors seeking to develop software
multimedia conferencing solutions.
CU-SeeMe Web, our latest offering to improve Internet communications,
enables live audio, video and text chat to be embedded in a standard web
browser. CU-SeeMe Web opens up a new world of applications for the Internet,
enabling on-demand Visual Instant Messaging, web-based videochat, live
interactive web events, and face-to-face, on-line call centers for ecommerce and
support services. CU-SeeMe Web is a software application that allows web page
developers to embed audio, video, text chat and conference control features into
a web page. The design of the web page can be completely customized by the
developer, as can the destination of the CU-SeeMe Web connection. CU-SeeMe Web
integrates with our MeetingPoint conference server, which provides many of the
back-end functions needed for applications like videochat, collaboration, IP
call centers, Internet event management, and other multipoint applications.
MeetingPoint also allows for additional innovation on the site--for example, a
small group of people could participate interactively with CU-SeeMe Web in a
live event, while the entire event could be streamed out to a large group of
viewers using MeetingPoint's Streaming Media integration technology.
Awards won by CU-SeeMe Web in 1999 included:
- October 1999
CU-SeeMe Web Technology named BEST OF SHOW at Fall Internet World
- November 1999
CU-SeeMe Web Technology named 1999 PRODUCT OF THE YEAR by INTERNET
TELEPHONY magazine
- December 1999
CU-SeeMe Web Technology named 1999 PRODUCT OF THE YEAR by CALL CENTER
SOLUTIONS magazine
VIDEOCHAT YOUR SITE
In March 2000, we introduced the commercial package of our CU-SeeMe Web
technology. The package, called Videochat Your Site, enables Internet websites
to embed live, interactive audio, video, and text chat into their site.
Videochat Your Site gives portals and affiliate sites a way to grow their user
communities and increase the amount of time that people spend on their sites. It
gives site users the value of participating in live visual communications, all
with the ease of a standard web browser.
24
<PAGE>
Videochat Your Site includes a software developers kit for CU-SeeMe Web
which enables a web developer to integrate the live audio, video and text
components into a site-branded page. It also includes a number of templates to
get websites up and running with the technology quickly and the MeetingPoint
server, which manages all of the backend aspects of group chatting and
conferencing. Pricing begins at $23,990 for the CU-SeeMe Web SDK and the
MeetingPoint license. A distribution license for the CU-SeeMe Web plug-in is
based on a revenue sharing model between our company and the customer.
CU-SEEME
CU-SeeMe is our desktop multimedia conferencing software for real time
person-to-person or group conferencing. CU-SeeMe works in conjunction with our
MeetingPoint conference server to provide a complete software-based, multipoint
conferencing solution.
CU-SeeMe can be used over the Internet or any Internet protocol-based
network, providing the user with the power to communicate globally without
expensive hardware. By operating over the Internet, CU-SeeMe substantially
broadens the base of businesses, organizations and individuals able to engage in
multimedia conferencing. This software-only solution runs on both Windows and
Macintosh platforms and offers full-color video, audio, chat window and
whiteboard communications. The user can participate in "Live over the Internet"
conferences, broadcasts or chats. CU-SeeMe can be launched directly from web
pages with the user's favorite web browser, using 28.8 Kbps modem, ISDN link or
faster connections. For audio-only telephony use, CU-SeeMe works effectively
over a 14.4 Kbps modem. CU-SeeMe is the only desktop conferencing client capable
of displaying up to twelve simultaneous video windows, allowing the user to see
everyone in a small-group conference without video switching. CU-SeeMe also is
the only cross-platform product capable of H.323 interoperability on Windows 95,
98 and NT, and MacOS.
The initial version of CU-SeeMe, introduced in March 1996, was the first
commercially available Internet-based multimedia conferencing product. CU-SeeMe
has been featured in a number of on-line and industry publications and has won a
substantial number of awards in its three years of commercial availability,
including:
- January 1998
CU-SeeMe V3.0 named BEST WEB COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCT OF THE YEAR 1997 by PC
COMPUTING magazine
- January 1998
CU-SeeMe BEST OF THE NET 1997 at Internet World
- January 1998
CU-SeeMe received 1997 EDITORS' CHOICE AWARD from CTI magazine
- January 1998
CU-SeeMe received 5 STAR SHAREWARE AWARD
- July 1998
CU-SeeMe received A-LIST AWARD from PC COMPUTING magazine
In addition, CU-SeeMe was recognized by PC Data, a leading marketing
intelligence firm, as the Top-Selling Retail Multimedia Conferencing Title for
the First Half of 1998.
We currently offer two versions of CU-SeeMe:
- CU-SEEME 3.1.2 began shipping in November 1998 and includes Contact List
feature. CU-SeeMe 3.1.2 is available on Windows 95, 98 and NT, and MacOS
platforms. However, with the introduction of CU-SeeMe Pro, we expect
future sales of CU-SeeMe 3.1.2 to be made
25
<PAGE>
principally to Macintosh users and original equipment manufacturers.
CU-SeeMe has a suggested retail price of $99.
- CU-SEEME PRO began shipping in March 1999 and represents our
next-generation client offering. CU-SeeMe Pro is available on Windows 95,
98 and NT platforms, has a suggested retail price of $99 and includes the
following features:
- full H.323 support, enabling direct interoperability with other H.323
clients such as Microsoft NetMeeting, Intel ProShare and PictureTel
LiveLAN;
- integrated desktop application sharing, whiteboard and data
collaboration via Microsoft NetMeeting;
- a set-up wizard that automatically defines the optimal settings based
on the user's network connection and capture device; and
- a "Conference Companion," which simplifies the way users make
connections, keep a contact list and access directory services. This
new feature replaces the address list found in prior versions and
enables a user to make a connection using only an e-mail address as
opposed to an Internet protocol address. It includes a Web-based home
page that can be customized for internal use by businesses.
We ship CU-SeeMe as packaged software and also make CU-SeeMe available for
downloading over the Internet. We also offer CU-SeeMe as a bundled package with
MeetingPoint and with third-party cameras. In December 1998, we began shipping
CU-SeeMe bundled with our private label camera, the CU-SeeMe Cam, a parallel
port, 256 color desktop camera. The CU-SeeMe Cam bundled package has a suggested
list price of $99.
CU-SEEME WORLD
In March 1999, we introduced our portal Web site, WWW.CUSEEMEWORLD.COM. We
believe CU-SeeMe World will help us promote CU-SeeMe, MeetingPoint, and
professional services sales by:
- providing a showcase for our visual communications and related "tools";
- building a centralized community of group conferencing users;
- facilitating user interaction through the utilization of member directors,
Web-based Internet Locator Service for locating users online, "safe" email
interchanges in which email addresses are masked and users exchange email
via user names, and threaded discussion groups;
- generating strategic alliances through sponsorships and partnering
opportunities; and
- encouraging content providers to offer structured conferencing and
programming.
We believe that successful management of the site will not only serve to
promote our ASP service offerings, but will generate advertising revenue and
strategic alliances through sponsorships and partnering opportunities.
MEETINGPOINT
MeetingPoint, the software-only server component of our multimedia
conferencing solution, allows users of CU-SeeMe to participate in multipoint,
multimedia conferences with a nearly unlimited number of users. Administrators
create and host conferences using MeetingPoint. End users then connect to the
conference, using either CU-SeeMe or any other third-party H.323 compliant
multimedia conferencing client product. MeetingPoint's core "multimedia router"
technology enables the group interaction to take place by "routing" it to the
other conference participants. MeetingPoint solves the complex problem of
enabling real-time multipoint communication over the Internet between
26
<PAGE>
users operating at different connection speeds without degrading the quality of
the entire conference to that of the slowest connection speed.
MeetingPoint, introduced in November 1997, was the industry's first H.323
compliant multimedia conferencing server. MeetingPoint's software-only
architecture makes it scalable and deployable over a variety of hardware
platforms and operating systems, including Windows NT and Solaris, a UNIX-based
user environment developed by Sun Microsystems. MeetingPoint for Solaris is the
only software-only conferencing server available on a UNIX platform.
MeetingPoint received two leading industry awards within the first few months of
its release: "1997 Product of the Year" by CTI MAGAZINE in the "Video
Conferencing" category and the "1997 Editors' Choice Award" from INTERNET
TELEPHONY magazine. In 1999, MeetingPoint received the following awards:
- January 1999
MeetingPoint named 1998 PRODUCT OF THE YEAR by INTERNET TELEPHONY magazine.
- February 1999
MeetingPoint named 1998 PRODUCT OF THE YEAR by CTI magazine.
- December 1999
MeetingPoint named 1999 PRODUCT OF THE YEAR by COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS
magazine (formerly CTI magazine).
MeetingPoint is able to manage the amount of network resources that are
consumed as it hosts a group conference. We believe that the use of Internet
protocol-based networks for real-time communication is beginning a phase of
significant growth, with thousands of new users every day and creative new
applications being discovered weekly. However, multimedia requires significant
bandwidth. While emerging technologies like Fast Ethernet, ADSL and high-speed
cable modems promise expanded bandwidth in the near future, today most users
face network constraints. Home users, for example, are usually limited to 28.8
Kbps modem connections. Business, governmental and educational enterprises may
have 10 Mbps modem local area networks, but these are used for a variety of
traditional, mission-critical applications such as file sharing, e-mail and
printing. Even network service providers are challenged to stretch their network
resources to cover rapidly growing customer traffic. In those rare instances
where bandwidth is plentiful, it typically comes at a relatively high cost,
especially for wide area network links. Because of these network constraints,
MeetingPoint's bandwidth management capability allows users to make the most of
the new collaboration, entertainment and learning possibilities that
network-based multimedia communications create, without having to make expensive
upgrades to their existing network infrastructure.
MeetingPoint's ability to manage the use of network resources while hosting
group conferencing arises from its core multimedia router technology. This
technology is focused on a single, very specific task: routing real-time
multimedia information among clients participating in group communications.
MeetingPoint manages and limits bandwidth use by using built-in intelligence
regarding the specific nature of multimedia data and real-time group
communications. Increased economies are achieved when wide-area communications
are routed through servers spread out across an organization's network, either
to network service provider "points of presence" or to remote offices on an
intranet.
In October 1998, we became the first company to demonstrate continuous
presence for H.323 conferencing, as an add-on to MeetingPoint. Continuous
presence enhances the conferencing experience by enabling the conference
participants to see up to four video windows at one time. Prior to the
continuous presence capability, H.323 client users could only see the
participant that was talking, and not any of the other participants. We made it
possible, for the first time, for many popular H.323 clients in a multipoint
group conferencing environment to utilize continuous presence, including users
of Microsoft NetMeeting, Intel ProShare and PictureTel LiveLAN. Continuous
Presence is delivered to these desktop H.323 clients through a software add-on
option to MeetingPoint and represents a feature
27
<PAGE>
add previously only available through H.320 conferencing. Continuous presence
was made generally available to the public in the second fiscal quarter of 1999.
Additionally, we offer a Streaming Media Integration add-on to MeetingPoint.
With the option for integration of streaming media, MeetingPoint is able to
broadcast a live interactive conference to hundreds or even thousands of people
using a streaming media server and player such as the Microsoft NetShow Server
and a Windows Media Player. Conferences can be broadcast live, or recorded and
replayed on demand. Because the Windows Media Player is widely available as a
free applet, it extends the possibilities for conferencing with and
communicating to a much wider audience. This combination of technologies, with
both an interactive group of participants and a viewing group of participants,
lends itself to a number of corporate and Internet scenarios.
MeetingPoint pricing begins as a suggested retail price of $8,995 for ten
user connections. We also license CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint as a bundled package
and offer site licenses and volume discounts for larger purchases.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Our research and development activities historically were separated between
legacy connectivity products and group conferencing products. We believe our
future success depends on our group conferencing solutions, and, in conjunction
with our sale of the assets of the legacy connectivity business in February
2000, we have focused all of our research and development resources on group
conferencing technology.
Our research and development expenditures totaled $1.4 million in the first
three months of 2000, $4.8 million in 1999 and $5.0 million in 1998. We expect
to gradually increase the levels of resources devoted to research and
development in the remaining quarters of 2000. The actual amount of research and
development expenses will depend on a number of factors, including the level of
market acceptance of our current products, our ability to fill headcount
requisitions on a timely basis, and the rate of technological change in the
group conferencing industry.
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
We market and sell our products through a combination of distributors,
original equipment manufacturers and strategic partners, our Certified Alliance
Partners program for resellers, our direct sales organization, and directly over
the Internet. Our sales force is located in Nashua, New Hampshire, San Jose,
California, and La Gaude, France. We maintain web sites where prospective
customers can obtain information about our products and services and download
our multimedia conferencing products. We conduct marketing programs, including
direct mail, advertising, public relations and product literature, to support
each of our sale channels and to position and promote our products and services.
Marketing personnel provide price lists and product descriptions and assist the
direct sales force through lead generation and sales training.
Our primary strategy for marketing and distributing our group conferencing
products is to establish new strategic and original equipment manufacturer
relationships and extend existing relationships with multinational firms that
provide particular marketing or distribution opportunities or technological
capabilities for our group conferencing products. We have already established
distribution relationships in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Egypt, Finland,
France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea,
Netherlands, Norway, Slovania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the
United Kingdom. We have also formed original equipment manufacturer or bundling
relationships in order to provide customers with turnkey solutions and to
facilitate product sales through distribution channels. In 1996, we began to
employ Tech Data and Ingram Micro as distributors to deliver CU-SeeMe to
consumers through retail channels including store chains and superstores.
28
<PAGE>
CUSTOMERS
Our customers include ISPs, portal sites, businesses, educational
institutions, government organizations and individual consumers. We sell our
software to end users and to original equipment manufacturers that bundle our
software with other products. We intend to sell our Internet communications
services to ISPs, portal sites and businesses.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT
We are committed to maintaining customer satisfaction and loyalty. We employ
technical customer representatives located in Nashua, New Hampshire to support
and service our customer base. Certain of our distributors and original
equipment manufacturer customers maintain separate customer support
organizations for their own customers. We provide second-tier support to those
organizations.
We provide customer support via telephone, fax and e-mail during normal
business hours for our warranty product customers. We also offer a variety of
fee-based maintenance and support options, including a 24x7 option, and
automatic shipments of all enhancements and upgrades for licensed products. To
augment our optional support services, we provide online frequently asked
questions and an auto-response knowledge base for e-mail inquiries. We monitor a
number of third-party mail lists and related web sites in order to ensure
technical accuracy for our products. Customer support specialists diagnose and
solve technical problems related not only to our products but also to other
hardware and software with which our products may interact. We track all support
requests, including current status reports and historical customer interaction
logs, using a series of customer databases. We use customer feedback as a source
of ideas for product improvements and enhancements.
In February 1999, we began charging CU-SeeMe customers for technical support
on a per-incident basis if they are not covered by a maintenance contract.
PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
Our success is heavily dependent upon our proprietary technology. We
currently have no patents and rely primarily on copyright, trademark and trade
secrets law, as well as employee and third-party non-disclosure agreements, to
protect our intellectual property. We have applied for a patent on a portion of
the technology underlying the continuous presence feature of MeetingPoint. There
can be no assurance that the steps taken by us to protect our proprietary rights
will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology or independent
development by others of similar technology. Litigation may be necessary to
enforce our intellectual property rights or to protect our trade secrets. Any
such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. Moreover, while we believe that our products and
technology do not infringe the proprietary rights of others, there can be no
assurance that third parties will not assert infringement and other claims
against us or that such claims will not be successful. See "Risk Factors--We may
be unable to protect our proprietary technology."
As described below, in 1998, we took several steps to acquire ownership of
technology embedded in our software offerings.
ACQUISITION OF TECHNOLOGY FROM CORNELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Our multimedia conferencing products, CU-SeeMe and MeetingPoint, are
commercial, enhanced versions of Freeware CU-SeeMe and its related server.
Freeware CU-SeeMe and its related server were developed by a research institute
at Cornell University and were freely available on the Web. In June 1995, we
entered into an software license agreement with the Cornell Research Foundation
that granted us the exclusive worldwide right to develop, modify, market,
distribute and sublicense
29
<PAGE>
commercial versions of Freeware CU-SeeMe and its related server, as well as the
rights to appoint licensee distributors and to use the trademark "CU-SeeMe."
We commenced shipments of the initial commercial versions of CU-SeeMe and
the White Pine Reflector (the predecessor of MeetingPoint) in March 1996 and May
1996, respectively. In May 1997, we renegotiated the terms of the license
agreement to provide for a $1,000,000 prepayment of royalties in exchange for a
decrease in the level of revenue-based royalties payable to the Cornell Research
Foundation. The renegotiated terms were retroactive to January 1, 1997, and we
remained subject to minimum royalty payments.
In November 1998, we acquired the Cornell Research Foundation's trademark
and other intellectual property rights in Freeware CU-SeeMe, upon which our
current versions of CU-SeeMe are based, and the related server technology, which
underlies MeetingPoint. The purchase price for these rights consisted of (1) a
note in the principal amount of $900,000, of which $300,000 is due on each of
June 30, 2000, June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2002, and (2) warrants to purchase
150,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. The warrants
were issued in exchange for outstanding warrants issued previously to the
Cornell Research Foundation; these prior warrants had an exercise price of $6.00
per share but otherwise had terms substantially identical to those of the new
warrants.
ACQUISITION OF TECHNOLOGY FROM LABTAM COMMUNICATIONS
In July 1998, we purchased certain assets, including intellectual property,
comprising certain T.120 whiteboard and data collaboration technology from
Labtam Communications, an Australian corporation. The purchase price for these
assets consisted of 900,000 shares of our common stock and cash payments of
U.S.$628,000 in July 1998 and A$201,606 (or U.S.$133,000) in January 1999. The
terms of, and consideration paid in, this transaction were the result of arm's
length negotiations between Labtam Communications and us, which had no
relationship prior to the transaction. We used cash and cash equivalents to pay
the cash portion of the purchase price. An aggregate of 450,000 shares was
deposited in escrow as security for potential claims by us against Labtam
Communications for breaches of certain representations, warranties, covenants
and agreements contained in the purchase agreement relating to the Labtam
assets. A total of 225,000 of the escrowed shares were released to Labtam
Communications in January 1999 and the remaining 225,000 escrowed shares were
released in July 1999.
We have incorporated the purchased T.120 technology into our MeetingPoint
and ClassPoint conferencing solutions. T.120 is the protocol that defines
whiteboard, application sharing and data collaboration for multipoint
conferencing applications.
TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION FROM RADVISION
In December 1998, we acquired from RADVision a one-time source code snapshot
of a H.323 protocol stack. This acquisition has allowed us to modify and enhance
certain source code embedded in our products.
COMPETITION
The market for multimedia conferencing products and services is extremely
competitive, and we expect that competition will intensify in the future. We
believe that the principal competitive factors in the multimedia group
conferencing industry are price, video and audio quality, interoperability,
functionality, reliability, service and support, hardware platforms supported,
and vendor and product reputation. We believe that our ability to compete
successfully will depend on a number of factors both within and outside our
control, including the adoption and evolution of industry standards, the pricing
policies of our competitors and suppliers, the timing of the introduction of new
software products and services by us and others, our ability to hire and retain
quality employees, and industry and general
30
<PAGE>
economic trends. In addition, because the barriers to entry in the software
market are relatively low and the potential market is large, we anticipate
continued growth in the industry and the entrance of new competitors in the
future.
In offering Internet communications products and services, we currently
compete, or expect to compete, directly or indirectly with the following
categories of companies:
- H.323 MCU providers, such as PictureTel, Ezenia!, RADVision and Accord;
- videoconferencing client providers, including MicroSoft NetMeeting,
Polycom, PictureTel, VTEL, Intel and VCON;
- nonvideoconferencing collaborative product providers, such as Centra,
Placeware, Astound and WebEx; and
- application service providers PictureTel, FVC, HearMe.com and Lipstream.
The H.323 MCU market encompasses two types of MCUs: a software-only server
and a hardware server. There is a substantial price variance between software
and hardware servers, which tends to dictate the suitability of one or the other
in specific situations. From a price and scaleability standpoint, the software
server lends itself well to large, distributed and expandable deployments,
whereas the hardware server is often best suited to finite centralized
deployments. White Pine and PictureTel market the only software-only MCUs;
Ezenia!, RADVision and Accord market hardware MCUs. Most of these companies work
with third-party endpoints. White Pine and PictureTel are the only vendors
offering a complete end-to-end (client/server) solution.
As with MCUs, client vendors can be split into software or hardware
categories. In the software client category, our CU-SeeMe competes with
MicroSoft's NetMeeting. Polycom, PictureTel, Vtel, Intel and VCON all provide
hardware clients. The hardware assist typically allowed the hardware clients to
demonstrate performance superior to software-only clients, justifying the $1,000
to $12,000 price point. Intel ProShare and TeamStation are both hardware-based
endpoints, and utilize technology which Intel has licensed to PictureTel. Sales
of these products are targeted to the high-end videoconferencing enterprise
market. Integrators and value-added resellers wrap solutions around ProShare and
TeamSolution endpoints, using their API, along with MeetingPoint's API, to
provide full solutions to enterprise and high-end NSPs. This includes distance
learning and videoconferencing service offerings.
The disparate nonvideoconferencing category encompasses semi-interactive
presentation software solutions. Semi-interactive presentation software
solutions is a broad term utilized here to represent products integrating
streaming with some form of limited interactive technology. These companies
offer products that combine streaming media, shared text, and separate telephony
integration in one solution. Centra, Placeware, Astound and WebEx all provide
business collaboration products. NetPodium and LearnLinc provide educational
solutions.
In the emerging ASP market, there are a number of companies that provide IP
communications services. PictureTel and FVC offer conferencing services to their
business-to-business customers. WebEx primarily concentrates its services in the
data collaboration arena, and EVC offers educational content conferencing
services to its customers. HearMe.com and Lipstream leverage their nonstandard
Voice over IP (VOIP) technology into Internet community development, Internet
media products, and portals with communication services.
H.323 is being rapidly adopted by the industry as the global standard for
group conferencing products. A number of companies have announced
standards-based server products that compete directly with MeetingPoint,
including PictureTel, Ezenia! and RADVision. It is likely that other companies
will also enter this market in the near future.
31
<PAGE>
Many of our current and potential competitors, including Intel, Microsoft,
PictureTel and Ezenia!, have significantly longer operating histories and
significantly greater managerial, financial, marketing, technical and other
competitive resources, as well as greater name recognition, than we do. As a
result, our competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer requirements or may be able to devote
greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully with existing or
new competitors. In addition, competition could increase if new companies enter
the market or if existing competitors expand their service offerings. An
increase in competition could result in material price reductions or loss of
market share by us and could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
To remain competitive, we will need to continue to invest in research and
development and sales and marketing. We cannot assure you that we will have
sufficient resources to make such investments or that we will be able to make
the technological advances necessary to remain competitive. In addition, current
and potential competitors have established or may in the future establish
collaborative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including
third parties with which we have a relationship, to increase the visibility and
utility of their products and services. Accordingly, it is possible that new
competitors or alliances may emerge and rapidly acquire a significant market
share. Such an eventuality could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
EMPLOYEES
At June 19, 2000, we had 152 full-time employees, including 46 in sales and
marketing, 45 in research and development, 17 in professional services, 15 in
technical support and 29 in general and administrative and software
manufacturing. Nineteen of these employees were located in France and, in
accordance with applicable French law, were represented by a labor union. Our
other employees were located in the United States and were not represented by
any labor organization. We have experienced no work stoppages and believe that
our relations with our employees are good.
FACILITIES
We conduct our operations from our headquarters in Nashua, New Hampshire and
facilities in San Jose, California, Somerville, Massachusetts and La Gaude,
France.
The main facility in the New Hampshire contains approximately 27,000 square
feet, including 23,500 square feet for engineering and office space, 2,500
square feet for production space and 1,000 square feet for storage. Our second
facility in New Hampshire contains approximately 7,000 square feet of office
space. We lease both offices in New Hampshire from an unaffiliated party. The
main facility is under the terms of a five-year lease ending July, 2001 under
which we are responsible for maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance and
utilities. Base rent is $143,000 for 2000, and $82,000 for the first half of
2001. Renewal options for three two-year terms are available to us. The second
facility in New Hampshire is under the terms of a three-year lease ending April,
2003 under which we are responsible for taxes and insurance. Base rent is
$84,000 in 2000, $129,000 in 2001, $132,000 in 2002 and $44,000 in 2003.
The facility in Somerville contains approximately 560 square feet of Network
Operation Center space. We lease the facility from an unaffiliated party under
the terms of a three year lease ending April, 2003. Base rent which includes 100
Mbps internet connection is $130,000 for 2000, $195,000 for 2001, $195,000 for
2002 and $65,000 for 2003.
The facility in San Jose contains approximately 100 square feet of office
space. We rent our office in San Jose from an unaffiliated party under the terms
of a renewable six-month rental agreement expiring December, 2000. Base rent for
this office space for 2000 is $19,000.
32
<PAGE>
We previously occupied 5,000 square feet of engineering and office space at
a different site in San Jose. This space has been subleased to an unaffiliated
party under the terms of a five-year lease ending December 31, 2001. Base rent
for this space is $84,000 for 2000 and $89,000 for 2001. Our base income under
the sublease exceeds our base rent under the primary lease.
The facility in La Gaude contains approximately 8,000 square feet of
engineering and office space. We lease our office in France from several
unaffiliated parties under a series of similar leases ending on December 31,
2001, under which we are responsible for maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance
and utilities. Base rent for this space is $7,400 for 2000 and 2001.
We expect to move our headquarters to a larger facility before the end of
the first quarter of 2001. We also expect to extend or renew the leases for our
San Jose and La Gaude facilities and to continue to occupy those facilities for
the foreseeable future. If we are unable to extend or renew those leases on
acceptable terms, we believe that alternative space would be available at
acceptable rates.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we have received and may receive in the future notice of
claims of infringement of other parties' proprietary rights. Although we believe
that our products and technology do not infringe the proprietary rights of
others, there can be no assurance that additional third parties will not assert
infringement and other claims against us or that any infringement claims will
not be successful. See "Risk Factors--We may be unable to protect our
proprietary technology."
33
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Our executive officers and directors and their ages as of June 14, 2000 are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- -------- ----------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Killko A. Caballero............... 40 Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
Christine J. Cox.................. 41 Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
David O. Bundy.................... 41 Chief Technology Officer
John E. Kelly..................... 46 Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing
Joseph J. Esposito(1)............. 49 Director
Jonathan G. Morgan(1)(2).......... 46 Director
Adam Stettner(2).................. 36 Director
</TABLE>
------------------------
(1) Member of the Compensation Committee
(2) Member of the Audit Committee
KILLKO A. CABALLERO has served as one of our directors since November 1995
and was appointed as our Chairman in January 2000. He has been our Chief
Executive Officer since December 1998 and our President since August 1997. He
has served as a director since November 1995 and as our Chairman since
January 2000. He served as our interim President during June and July 1997 and
as our Senior Vice President of Research and Development and Chief Technology
Officer from November 1995 until June 1997. Mr. Caballero was a co-founder of
White Pine Software, Europe and served as President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of White Pine Software, Europe from July 1991 until
November 1995.
CHRISTINE J. COX has been our Treasurer and Assistant Secretary since
May 2000, our Chief Financial Officer since December 1998 and our Vice President
of Finance since August 1997. She was our Corporate Controller from
October 1996 to August 1997. Ms. Cox served as Division Controller and Treasurer
of Sequoia Systems, Inc., a fault-tolerant and business-critical microcomputer
company, from May 1996 to October 1996, Operations Controller of Sequoia from
June 1995 to May 1996, and held other financial management positions at Sequoia
from August 1993 to June 1995.
DAVID O. BUNDY has been our Chief Technology Officer since July 1998 and as
our Vice President of Engineering from January 1994 to July 1998. Mr. Bundy was
the Vice President and Principal Engineer of our predecessor company from
September 1991 to December 1993.
JOHN E. KELLY has been our Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing
since March 1999. He founded Aura Networks, a developer of datacentric digital
loop carrier products, in May 1997 and was President of Aura from May 1997 until
November 1998. From 1993 to April 1997, Mr. Kelly was Vice President of
Marketing at Intraplex, Incorporated, a developer of digital network products
for broadcast and wireless communications, which was acquired by Harris
Corporation in November 1998.
JOSEPH J. ESPOSITO has served as one of our directors since January 2000.
Currently he works as a consultant for our company and others, focusing on the
communications and information industries. From September 1999 until December
1999, he was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tribal Voice, a
provider of instant messaging, interactive communications and online community
solutions, until it was sold to CMGI, Inc. Prior to joining Tribal Voice, Mr.
Esposito worked in the publishing industry, with tenures at Simon & Schuster and
Random House. Mr. Esposito also served as Chief Executive Officer of
Encyclopaedia Britannica.
34
<PAGE>
JONATHAN G. MORGAN has served as one of our directors since May 1996. He has
been Managing Director of Prudential Securities Incorporated, an investment
banking firm, since June 1993 and currently serves in the Prudential Volpe
Technology Group, a division of Prudential Securities.
ADAM STETTNER has served as one of our directors since March 1999. He has
been Managing Director of the Special Situations Technology Fund, an investment
fund, since April 1997 and President of Stettner Consultants, Inc., a computer
consulting company, since 1989.
Executive officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the
board. Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of
stockholders (or special meeting in lieu thereof) and until their successors are
duly elected and qualified.
BOARD COMMITTEES
Our board of directors has appointed an Audit Committee and a Compensation
Committee. Our board has not appointed a standing Nominating Committee.
The Audit Committee reviews the results and scope of the annual audit of our
financial statements conducted by our independent auditors and our policies and
procedures with respect to our internal accounting and financial controls. The
Audit Committee also makes recommendations to our board on the engagement of our
independent auditors, as well as other matters referred by our board. The Audit
Committee currently consists of Jonathan Morgan and Adam Stettner.
The Compensation Committee provides recommendations concerning salaries,
incentives and other compensation for our directors, officers, employees and
consultants. The Compensation Committee also administers our stock option plans
and our employee stock purchase plan. The Compensation Committee currently
consists of Joseph Esposito and Jonathan Morgan.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
We do not pay fees to our directors, and we presently have no plans to pay
directors' fees. We grant stock options to our non-employee directors pursuant
to our director stock option plan. The purpose of the director stock option plan
is to encourage ownership of common stock by our non-employee directors in order
to help us attract and retain directors of exceptional competence and to furnish
an added incentive for non-employee directors to increase their efforts on our
behalf. Joseph Esposito, Jonathan Morgan and Adam Stettner are non-employee
directors for purposes of the director stock option plan.
Under the terms of the director stock option plan, we grant automatic
formula stock options to non-employee directors as follows:
- upon a non-employee director's initial election, he or she is entitled to
receive a stock option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock; and
- upon a non-employee director's re-election, he or she is entitled to
receive a stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock, as long
as he or she has served as a non-employee director for at least the three
months immediately preceding the meeting at which he or she is re-elected.
The exercise price of the options granted under the director stock option
plan must equal the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date.
Each option granted under the director stock option plan is subject to vesting
under the terms of such plan and expires upon the earlier of (a) the tenth
anniversary of the grant date and (b) the first anniversary of the date on which
the option holder ceased serving as a non-employee director.
35
<PAGE>
Pursuant to the director stock option plan, Mr. Morgan received an option to
purchase 15,000 shares of common stock in September 1997 upon the adoption of
the director stock option plan by our stockholders. Mr. Stettner received an
option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock in March 1999 upon his election
to the board. In addition, each of Messrs. Morgan and Stettner received an
option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock in July 1999 upon their
re-election to the board of directors. Mr. Esposito received an option to
purchase 15,000 shares of common stock in January 2000 upon his election to the
board.
In addition, on December 16, 1998, our board voted to grant to Mr. Morgan
options to purchase 35,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.875
per share, which represented the closing price of common stock on the grant
date. These options were issued under our 1996 stock option plan. They vest over
a two-year period.
On April 24, 2000, our board voted to grant to Mr. Esposito options to
purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $14.625 per
share, which represented the market value on the date of grant. These options
were issued under our 1996 stock option plan. They vest over a one-year period.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 1997, 1998 AND 1999
The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the
annual and long-term compensation that we paid for the past three fiscal years
to the following persons (the "Named Officers"):
- Killko Caballero, our only chief executive officer in 1999; and
- David Bundy, Christine Cox and John Kelly, our other three executive
officers whose compensation for services rendered in all capacities to us
exceeded $100,000 during 1999.
All of the options described in the following table have a maximum term of
seven to ten years, subject to earlier termination in the event of the
optionee's cessation of service with us. The options are exercisable during the
optionee's lifetime only by the optionee. They are exercisable by the optionee
only while the optionee is one of our employees or advisors and for certain
limited periods of time after termination of employment.
36
<PAGE>
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
------------
AWARDS
ANNUAL ------------
COMPENSATION SECURITIES
-------------------- UNDERLYING ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($) OPTIONS(#) COMPENSATION($)
--------------------------- -------- --------- -------- ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Killko A. Caballero..................... 1999 $155,140 $45,000 115,000 --
Chief Executive Officer, President and 1998 150,445 -- 35,000 --
Chairman 1997 124,347 20,000 50,000 --
David O. Bundy.......................... 1999 128,546 25,000 30,000 --
Chief Technology Officer 1998 132,405 -- 20,000 $20,000(1)
1997 119,909 15,000 60,000 --
Christine J. Cox........................ 1999 112,470 20,000 66,000 --
Chief Financial Officer, 1998 105,467 -- 20,000 --
Vice President of Finance, Treasurer 1997 83,384 15,000 37,000 --
and Assistant Secretary
John F. Kelly(2)........................ 1999 140,905(3) -- 75,000 --
Vice President of Worldwide
Sales and Marketing
</TABLE>
------------------------
(1) The other compensation paid to Mr. Bundy in 1998 consisted of amounts
paid in connection with Mr. Bundy's relocation, at our request, to New
Hampshire.
(2) Mr. Kelly joined White Pine in March 1999.
(3) Includes commissions paid to Mr. Kelly in 1999.
37
<PAGE>
OPTION GRANTS IN 1999
The following table summarizes (a) option grants to the Named Officers
during 1999 and (b) the value of options held by the Named Officers at
December 31, 1999. The amounts shown in the last two columns represent
hypothetical gains that could be achieved for the respective options if
exercised at the end of their option terms. These gains are based on assumed
rates of stock appreciation of five percent and ten percent, compounded annually
from the date the respective options were granted to the date of their
expiration. The gains shown are net of the option price, but do not include
deductions for taxes or other expenses that may be associated with the exercise.
Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises will depend on the future
performance of our common stock, the option holders' continued employment
through the option term, and the date on which the options are exercised.
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
------------------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED
PERCENT OF ANNUAL RATES
NUMBER OF TOTAL OF STOCK PRICE
SECURITIES OPTIONS APPRECIATION FOR
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO EXERCISE OR OPTION TERM
OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN BASE PRICE PER EXPIRATION -----------------------
NAME GRANTED(#) FISCAL YEAR SHARE($/SH) DATE 5%($) 10%($)
---- ---------- ------------ -------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Killko A. Caballero............ 115,000 13% $25.375 12/17/09 $1,835,193 $4,650,740
David O. Bundy................. 30,000 3 25.375 12/17/09 478,746 1,213,236
Christine J. Cox............... 50,000 6 25.375 12/17/09 797,910 2,022,061
16,000 2 6.625 7/23/09 66,663 168,937
John E. Kelly.................. 75,000 8 2.8125 3/15/09 132,657 336,180
</TABLE>
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN 1999 AND OPTION VALUES AT DECEMBER 31, 1999
The following table summarizes information about options exercised during
1999, and the value of unexercised options held at the end of 1999, by the Named
Officers. The closing sale price for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq
National Market on December 31, 1999 was $24.50. For purposes of the last column
in the table, value is calculated on the basis of the difference between the
option exercise price and $24.50, multiplied by the number of shares of common
stock underlying the options.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SHARES UNEXERCISED OPTIONS IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
ACQUIRED AT FISCAL YEAR-END(#) FISCAL YEAR-END($)
ON VALUE --------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME EXERCISE(#) REALIZED($) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Killko A. Caballero...... -- -- 33,750 166,250 $ 747,969 $1,143,906
David O. Bundy........... 35,000 $405,000 45,625 69,375 1,006,875 875,625
Christine J. Cox......... -- -- 23,875 96,125 528,375 958,125
John E. Kelly............ -- -- 9,375 65,625 203,320 1,423,242
</TABLE>
BENEFIT PLANS
In each of 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996, our board adopted a stock option
plan, each of which was approved by our stockholders in the year of adoption.
Options may no longer be granted under these plans. In addition, in July 1996
our board adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 1996
38
<PAGE>
stock option plan, under which a total of 2,400,000 shares of common stock have
been reserved for issuance, subject to stockholder approval. As of June 14,
2000, options to purchase an aggregate of 2,055,909 shares of common stock
having a weighted average exercise price of $12.1142 per share were outstanding
under these option plans.
The 1996 option plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. Under
the 1996 option plan, the Compensation Committee selects the individuals to whom
options will be granted and determines the option exercise price and other terms
of each option, subject to the provisions of the 1996 option plan.
The 1996 option plan authorizes the grant of options to purchase common
stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options, as defined in Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code, and the grant of options that do not so qualify,
or nonqualified options. Under the 1996 option plan, incentive stock options may
be granted only to our officers and other employees, including members of our
board who are also our employees. Nonqualified Options may be granted to
officers or other employees of our company or any subsidiary, to members of our
board or the board of directors of a subsidiary, whether or not employees of our
company or a subsidiary, and to consultants and other individuals providing
services to us or a subsidiary.
The 1996 option plan provides that, upon a reorganization, merger,
consolidation, liquidation or sale of substantially all of our assets, the
Compensation Committee may accelerate the time for exercise of all unexercised
and unexpired options to and after a date prior to the effective date of the
specified transaction. Alternatively, the Compensation Committee may cancel any
outstanding options as of the effective date of the specified transaction,
provided that the Compensation Committee shall have accelerated the time for
exercise of all unexercised and unexpired options that it proposes to cancel and
shall have given each optionholder notice of and a right to exercise such
options in full. If the Compensation Committee does not take either of the
foregoing actions, then after the effective date of the specified transaction
unexercised options shall remain outstanding and shall be exercisable for shares
of common stock or, if applicable, shares of such stock or other securities,
cash or property as the holders of shares of common stock shall have received in
the transaction.
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In July 1996, our board adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 1996
stock purchase plan, under which up to 100,000 shares of common stock could be
purchased by our employees. In July 1999, our stockholders approved an amendment
of the purchase plan to increase the total number of shares available for
issuance from 100,000 to 200,000.
During each six-month offering period under the 1996 purchase plan,
participating employees are entitled to purchase shares through payroll
deductions. The maximum number of shares that may be purchased is determined on
the first day of the offering period pursuant to a formula under which a
specific percentage of the employee's projected base pay for the offering period
is divided by 85% of the market value of one share of common stock on the first
day of the offering period, multiplied by two. During each offering period, the
price at which the employee is able to purchase shares of common stock is equal
to 85% of the last trading price of the common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market on the date that the offering period commences or the date the offering
period concludes, whichever is lower.
The Stock Purchase Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. All
employees who meet certain minimum criteria based on hours worked per week and
length of tenure with us are eligible to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan.
No employee may be granted an option under the Stock Purchase Plan (a) if the
option would permit the employee's rights to purchase stock under the Stock
Purchase Plan to exceed $25,000 of the fair market value of the stock for each
calendar year in which such option is outstanding or (b) if, immediately after
the grant, the employee would own stock
39
<PAGE>
possessing three percent or more of the total combined voting power or value of
all classes of stock of our company or any subsidiary.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
We entered into a nondisclosure and noncompetition agreement with David O.
Bundy dated February 15, 1996. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Bundy agreed that
while employed by us and for a period of 19 months following the termination of
his employment with us for any reason, he will not, directly or indirectly,
compete with us or solicit any of our employees, contractors, suppliers,
existing customers or prospective customers on behalf of himself or any other
entity that engages in the sale, distribution or development of or research
concerning computer software and technology in breach of the agreement. Either
party may terminate the agreement by giving the other party thirty days' prior
written notice. If Mr. Bundy's employment is terminated without cause during the
term of the agreement, he will be entitled to his base salary for six months or
until he becomes employed elsewhere, whichever occurs first; provided, however,
that if his new salary is lower than his base salary at our company, we will pay
the difference for the balance of this six-month period.
We entered into a letter agreement dated August 5, 1997 with Christine J.
Cox with respect to her employment as our Vice President of Finance. The letter
agreement establishes a base salary of $100,000 per year and provides for a
maximum annual incentive bonus of $15,000, based upon achievement of specific
milestones to be established by us. If Ms. Cox's employment is terminated
without cause during the term of the agreement, she will be entitled to her base
salary for six months. The letter agreement does not provide for any minimum
period of employment, and therefore Ms. Cox continues to be an at-will employee.
40
<PAGE>
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In December 1999, we sold 78,125 shares of common stock to Special
Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., 65,104 shares of common stock to Special
Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., and 182,292 shares of common stock to Special
Situations Fund III, L.P., at a price of $15.36 per share. These 325,521 shares
are included in the shares being offered by this prospectus. Under SEC
regulations, these funds may be deemed to be affiliated with Austin W. Marxe and
David Greenhouse, who beneficially owned 9.1% of our common stock as of
June 14, 2000, and Adam Stettner, one of our directors. The shares sold to these
funds were sold on terms identical to the terms under which we sold an
additional 976,563 shares of common stock to third parties in December 1999.
We have entered into employment agreements with two executive officers. See
"Management--Employment Agreements."
41
<PAGE>
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of June 14, 2000, by (a) each of our directors,
(b) each of the Named Officers, (c) all of our directors and executive officers
as a group, (d) each of the persons (or groups of affiliated persons) known by
us to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding shares of
common stock and (e) each of the Selling Stockholders. Unless otherwise noted:
- The address of our directors and executive officers is in care of CUseeMe
Networks, Inc., 542 Amherst Street, Nashua, New Hampshire 03063, except as
noted below.
- Each person or group identified in the table possesses sole voting and
investment power with respect to such shares, subject to community
property laws, where applicable. Shares not outstanding but deemed
beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person or group to acquire
them within sixty days of June 14, 2000 are treated as outstanding only
for purposes of determining the amount and percentages beneficially owned
by that person or group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
SHARES
NUMBER OF SHARES BENEFICIALLY
BENEFICIALLY OWNED OWNED
--------------------------------------------------- -------------------
OUTSTANDING RIGHT TO TOTAL SHARES BEFORE AFTER
SHARES ACQUIRE NUMBER OFFERED OFFERING OFFERING
----------- ------------------------- --------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Austin W. Marxe and David Greenhouse....... 1,108,421 -- 1,108,421 325,521 9.1% 6.4%
153 East 53 Street, 51st Floor
New York, New York 10022
Adam Stettner.............................. 1,108,421 25,000 1,133,421 325,521 9.3 6.6
153 East 53 Street, 51st Floor
New York, New York 10022
Consortium de Realisation.................. 820,330 -- 820,330 -- 6.7 6.7
27-29 rue Le Peletier
75009 Paris, France
Killko A. Caballero........................ 352,324 58,751 411,075 -- 3.4 3.3
David O. Bundy............................. 15,705 57,501 73,206 -- * *
Joseph J. Esposito......................... -- 6,250 6,250 -- * *
Jonathan G. Morgan......................... -- 57,708 57,708 -- * *
Christine J. Cox........................... 2,547 38,001 40,548 -- * *
John E. Kelly.............................. 22,750 -- 22,750 -- * *
All directors and executive officers as a 1,501,747 243,211 1,744,958 325,521 14.3 11.4
group (seven persons)....................
Other selling stockholders:
CFE, Inc. ................................. 325,521 -- 325,521 325,521 2.6 --
Private Equity Holding (Cayman) Ltd. ...... 325,521 -- 325,521 325,521 2.6 --
Altamira Management Ltd.................... 325,521 -- 325,521 325,521 2.6 --
</TABLE>
--------------------------
* Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
The information reported regarding Messrs. Marxe and Greenhouse is based on
Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 2, 2000 by Special Situations Fund III, L.P., MGP Advisers
Limited Partnership, Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P., SST Advisers,
L.L.C., Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., AWM Investment Company, Inc.,
Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., MG Advisors L.L.C., Austin W.
Marxe and David Greenhouse. Of the 1,108,421 shares, (a) 665,192 shares are
beneficially owned by Special Situations Fund III, L.P. and MGP Advisers Limited
Partnership (the general partner of and investment advisor to Special Situations
42
<PAGE>
Fund III, L.P.), (b) 143,600 shares are beneficially owned by Special Situations
Technology Fund, L.P. and SST Advisers, L.L.C. (the general partner of and
investment advisor to Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P.), (c) 221,504
shares are beneficially owned by Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P. and AWM
Investment Company, Inc. (the general partner of and investment advisor to
Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P.) and (d) 78,125 shares are beneficially
owned by Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P. and MG Advisors L.L.C.
Messrs. Marxe and Greenhouse, who serve as officers, directors and members or
principal shareholders of the three investment advisors, claim sole voting and
dispositive powers for all of the 1,108,421 shares. Of the shares offered,
78,125 are offered by Special Situations Private Equity Fund, L.P., 65,104 are
offered by Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P., and 182,292 are offered by
Special Situations Fund III, L.P.
Of the 1,133,421 shares deemed to be beneficially owned by Mr. Stettner,
1,108,421 consist of the shares described in the preceding paragraph.
Mr. Stettner is an employee of an entity controlled by Messrs. Marxe and
Greenhouse. Mr. Stettner disclaims ownership of all of these shares, other than
143,600 shares owned by Special Situations Technology Fund, L.P., of which he is
the managing director.
The information reported regarding the Consortium de Realisation is based on
a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2,
1997 by Consortium de Realisation, CDR Enterprises and Land Free Investment. All
of the 820,330 shares are directly owned by Land Free Investment, which is a
direct subsidiary of CDR Enterprises and an indirect subsidiary of Consortium de
Realisation. All of the reporting parties claim shared voting and dispositive
powers for all of the 820,330 shares.
CFE, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Capital
Corporation.
43
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock
and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of June 14, 2000, there were
outstanding 12,214,169 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock.
COMMON STOCK
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of
record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of the common
stock do not have cumulative voting rights, and therefore the holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors may
elect all of our directors standing for election. Subject to preferences that
may be applicable to the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock,
the holders of common stock are entitled to receive such lawful dividends as may
be declared by the board of directors. In the event of a liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of the affairs of our company, whether voluntary or
involuntary, and subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding shares
of preferred stock, the holders of shares of common stock shall be entitled to
receive pro rata all of our remaining assets available for distribution to our
stockholders. The common stock has no preemptive, redemption, conversion or
subscription rights. All outstanding shares of common stock are, and the shares
of common stock to be issued pursuant to this offering will be, fully paid and
non-assessable. The issuance of common stock or of rights to purchase common
stock could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to
acquire, or of discouraging a third party from attempting to acquire, a majority
of our outstanding voting stock.
PREFERRED STOCK
The board of directors is authorized, subject to limitations prescribed by
Delaware law, to provide for the issuance of preferred stock in one or more
series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in
each such series, to fix the voting powers, designations, preferences and rights
(and the restrictions of those preferences and rights) of the shares of each
such series and to increase (but not above the total number of authorized shares
of preferred stock) or decrease (but not below the number of shares of such
series then outstanding) the number of shares of any such series without further
vote or action by the stockholders. The board is authorized to issue preferred
stock with voting, conversion, and other rights and preferences that could
adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of common
stock. Although we have no current plans to issue such shares, the issuance of
preferred stock or of rights to purchase preferred stock could have the effect
of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a
third party from attempting to acquire, a majority of our outstanding voting
stock.
ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS OF PROVISIONS OF OUR CHARTER, OUR BY-LAWS AND DELAWARE LAW
Our charter and by-laws contain provisions that could discourage potential
takeover attempts and make more difficult the acquisition of a substantial block
of the common stock. Our charter authorizes the directors to issue, without
stockholder approval, shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix
the voting powers, designations, preferences and rights (and the restrictions of
those preferences and rights) of the shares of each such series. Our charter
provides that stockholders may act only at meetings of stockholders and not by
written consent in lieu of a stockholders' meeting. Our by-laws provide that
nominations for directors may not be made by stockholders at any annual or
special meeting thereof unless the stockholder intending to make a nomination
notifies us of its intentions a specified number of days in advance of the
meeting and furnishes to us information regarding itself and the intended
nominee. Our by-laws also provide that special meetings of our stockholders may
be called only by the President and must be called by the President or the
Secretary at the written request of a majority of the directors. Our by-laws
also require a stockholder to provide to our Secretary
44
<PAGE>
advance notice of business to be brought by such stockholder before any
stockholder meeting as well as information regarding the stockholder and others
known to support the proposal and any material interest they may have in the
proposed business. These provisions could delay stockholder actions that are
favored by the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock until the next
stockholders' meeting. These provisions may also discourage another person or
entity from making a tender offer for our common stock, because the person or
entity, even after acquiring a majority of the outstanding stock, could only
take action at a duly called stockholders' meeting and not by written consent.
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in
any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three
years following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder,
unless;
- prior to such date, the board of directors of the corporation approved
either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
- upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder
becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at
least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time
the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the
number of shares outstanding those shares owned (a) by persons who are
directors and also officers and (b) by employee stock plans in which
employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially
whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or
exchange offer; or
- on or subsequent to such date, the business combination is approved by the
board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at
least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the
interested stockholder. The application of Section 203 may limit the
ability of stockholders to approve a transaction that they may deem to be
in their best interests.
Section 203 defines "business combination" to include (a) any merger or
consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder; (b) any
sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the
corporation to or with the interested stockholder; (c) subject to certain
exceptions, any transaction which results in the issuance or transfer by the
corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder;
(d) any transaction involving the corporation which has the effect of increasing
the proportionate share of the stock of any class or series of the corporation
beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or (e) the receipt by the
interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees,
pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation. In
general, Section 203 defines an "interested stockholder" as any entity or person
beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the
corporation and any entity or person associated with, affiliated with,
controlling or controlled by such entity or person.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
Our charter provides that no director shall be personally liable to us or to
any stockholder for monetary damages arising out of such director's breach of
fiduciary duty, except to the extent that the elimination or limitation of
liability is not permitted by Delaware law. The Delaware law, as currently in
effect, permits charter provisions eliminating the liability of directors for
breach of fiduciary duty, except that such provisions do not eliminate or limit
the liability of directors for (a) any breach of the director's duty of loyalty
to a corporation or its stockholders, (b) any acts or omissions not in good
faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law,
(c) any payment of a dividend or approval of a stock purchase that is illegal
under Section 174 of the Delaware General
45
<PAGE>
Corporation Law or (d) any transaction from which the director derived an
improper personal benefit. A principal effect of this provision of our charter
is to limit or eliminate the potential liability of our directors for monetary
damages arising from any breach of their duty of care, unless the breach
involves one of the four exceptions described in (a) through (d) above.
Our charter and by-laws further provide for the indemnification of our
directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, including circumstances in which
indemnification is otherwise discretionary. Insofar as indemnification for
liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors,
officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or
otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC that
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is, therefore, unenforceable.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is Boston EquiServe
L.P.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The shares offered by this prospectus may be sold from time to time by the
selling stockholders, who consist of the persons identified as offering shares
under "Principal and Selling Stockholders" above and those persons' pledgees,
donees, transferees or other successors in interest. The selling stockholders
may sell the shares on the Nasdaq National Market or otherwise, at market prices
or at negotiated prices. They may sell shares by one or a combination of the
following:
- a block trade in which a broker or dealer so engaged will attempt to sell
the shares as agent, but may position and resell a portion of the block as
principal to facilitate the transaction;
- purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by the broker or
dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus; and
- ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which a broker
solicits purchasers.
In effecting sales, brokers or dealers engaged by the selling stockholders
may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate. Brokers or dealers will
receive commissions or discounts from selling stockholders in amounts to be
negotiated prior to the sale. The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers
that participate in the distribution may be deemed to be "underwriters" within
the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Securities Act, and any proceeds or
commissions received by them, and any profits on the resale of shares sold by
broker-dealers, may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions.
If any selling stockholder notifies us that a material arrangement has been
entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares through a block trade,
special offering, exchange distribution or secondary distribution or a purchase
by a broker or dealer, we will file, a prospectus supplement, if required
pursuant to the Securities Act, setting forth:
- the name of each of the participating broker-dealers,
- the number of shares involved,
- the price at which the shares were sold,
- the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to the
broker-dealers, where applicable,
- a statement to the effect that the broker-dealers did not conduct any
investigation to verify the information set out or incorporated by
reference in this prospectus, and
- any other facts material to the transaction.
46
<PAGE>
LEGAL MATTERS
Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, has advised us with respect to the
validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. Mark L.
Johnson, a senior partner of Hale and Dorr LLP, is our Secretary.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements as of, and for the years ended,
December 31, 1998 and 1999 appearing in this prospectus and the related
registration statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
auditors, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus and the related registration statement. Those consolidated financial
statements are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of
Ernst & Young LLP as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC for our
common stock offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the
information set forth in the registration statement. You should refer to the
registration statement and its exhibits for additional information. Whenever we
make reference in this prospectus to any of our contracts, agreements or other
documents, the references are not necessarily complete and you should refer to
the exhibits attached to the registration statement or incorporated herein by
reference for the copies of the actual contract, agreement or other document. We
are also required to file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC.
You can read our SEC filings, including the registration statement, over the
Internet at the SEC's Web site at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy
any document we file with the SEC at its public reference facilities at Room
1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549; Suite
1400, 500 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661 and 7 World Trade Center,
Thirteenth Floor, New York, New York 10048. You may also obtain copies of the
documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the
SEC at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the
operation of the public reference facilities.
47
<PAGE>
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998:
Report of Independent Auditors.......................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and
1998................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998....................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity......... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.............. F-7
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND APRIL 2, 1999
(UNAUDITED):
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31,
2000 (unaudited) and December 31, 1999................. F-17
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and April 2, 1999
(unaudited)............................................ F-18
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2000 and April 2, 1999
(unaudited)............................................ F-19
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)............................................ F-20
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of White Pine
Software, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of White Pine
Software, Inc. and subsidiary at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Manchester, New Hampshire
February 1, 2000, except for
Note 10, as to which the
date is February 29, 2000.
F-2
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1999 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 22,087,638 $ 6,420,686
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $176,000 at
December 31, and $146,000 at December 31, 1998.......... 4,158,603 2,122,275
Inventories............................................... 53,769 64,916
Prepaid expenses.......................................... 237,628 328,562
Other current assets...................................... 79,337 108,871
------------ ------------
Total current assets.................................... 26,616,975 9,045,310
Property and equipment:
Computer equipment........................................ 1,278,157 1,227,647
Furniture and fixtures.................................... 240,596 245,823
Software.................................................. 625,699 536,285
Equipment................................................. 87,691 88,733
Leasehold improvements.................................... 202,689 240,552
------------ ------------
2,434,832 2,339,040
Accumulated depreciation and amortization................... (1,274,302) (985,405)
------------ ------------
1,160,530 1,353,635
Other assets:
Third party licenses, less accumulated amortization of
$432,000 at December 31, 1999 and $460,000 at December
31, 1998................................................ 559,844 933,914
Purchased Software, less accumulated amortization of
$608,000 at December 31, 1999 and $0 at December 31,
1998.................................................... 2,533,352 3,141,521
Trademark, less accumulated amortization of $93,000 at
December 31, 1999 and $13,000 at December 31, 1998...... 870,728 951,104
Goodwill, less accumulated amortization of $995,000 at
December 31, 1999 and $756,000 at December 31, 1998..... 198,845 437,463
Other assets.............................................. 105,908 132,823
------------ ------------
4,268,677 5,596,825
------------ ------------
Total assets................................................ 32,046,182 15,995,770
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable.......................................... 717,932 491,626
Accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities............ 2,253,800 1,555,055
Deferred revenue.......................................... 695,147 345,945
Current portion of long-term debt......................... 7,067 26,521
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities............................... 3,673,946 2,419,147
Long term debt, less current portion........................ - 7,067
Other long term liabilities................................. 600,000 1,154,808
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at December
31, 1999 or December 31, 1998........................... -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value: Authorized
shares--30,000,000 Issued and outstanding
shares--12,049,476 at December 31, 1999 and 10,460,227
at December 31, 1998.................................... 120,495 104,602
Additional paid-in capital................................ 61,269,773 41,137,186
Accumulated deficit....................................... (33,710,591) (28,861,083)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... 92,559 34,043
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity.............................. 27,772,236 12,414,748
------------ ------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................. $ 32,046,182 $ 15,995,770
============ ============
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-3
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 1998
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Software license fees..................................... $10,714,541 $ 6,948,222
Services and other........................................ 1,287,077 844,936
----------- -----------
Total revenue............................................. 12,001,618 7,793,158
Cost of revenue............................................. 2,547,509 1,645,249
----------- -----------
Gross profit.............................................. 9,454,109 6,147,909
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing..................................... 7,265,224 7,739,075
Research and development................................ 4,761,107 5,041,872
General and administrative.............................. 2,359,341 2,277,849
----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................................ 14,385,672 15,058,796
----------- -----------
Loss from operations........................................ (4,931,563) (8,910,887)
Other income (expense):
Interest income......................................... 177,679 577,393
Other, net.............................................. (95,624) (85,089)
----------- -----------
82,055 492,304
----------- -----------
Loss before provision for income taxes...................... (4,849,508) (8,418,583)
Provision for income taxes.................................. -- 5,306
----------- -----------
Net loss.................................................... $(4,849,508) $(8,423,889)
=========== ===========
Net loss per share: basic and diluted....................... $ (0.46) $ (0.86)
=========== ===========
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding........................................ 10,619,696 9,798,307
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-4
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACCUMULATED
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL OTHER TOTAL
----------------------- PAID-IN ACCUMULATED COMPREHENSIVE STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES PAR VALUE CAPITAL DEFICIT INCOME EQUITY
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31,
1997....................... 9,305,714 93,057 38,984,024 (20,437,194) 85,973 18,725,860
Net loss..................... (8,423,889) (8,423,889)
Common stock issued upon
exercise of stock
options.................... 198,111 1,981 199,036 -- -- 201,017
Common stock issued under
Employee Stock
PurchasePlan............... 56,402 564 70,456 -- -- 71,020
Common stock issued upon
purchase of intangible
assets..................... 900,000 9,000 1,819,170 -- -- 1,828,170
Warrants..................... 64,500 64,500
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income....... (51,930) (51,930)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------- ----------
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31,
1998....................... 10,460,227 104,602 41,137,186 (28,861,083) 34,043 12,414,748
Net loss..................... (4,849,508) (4,849,508)
Common stock issued upon
exercise of stock
options.................... 225,530 2,256 315,556 -- -- 317,812
Common stock issued under
Employee Stock
PurchasePlan............... 61,635 616 107,641 -- -- 108,257
Common stock issued in
private placement.......... 1,302,084 13,021 19,709,390 -- -- 19,722,411
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income....... 58,516 58,516
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------- ----------
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31,
1999....................... 12,049,476 120,495 61,269,773 (33,710,591) 92,559 27,772,236
========== ========== ========== =========== ======= ==========
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-5
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 1998
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss.................................................... $(4,849,508) $(8,423,889)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization............................. 454,258 522,766
Amortization of intangible assets......................... 1,301,234 533,043
Loss on disposal of fixed assets.......................... -- 30,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable..................................... (2,033,030) 283,866
Inventories............................................. 11,735 33,430
Prepaid expenses........................................ 88,485 435,859
Other assets............................................ 49,221 43,821
Accounts payable........................................ 245,177 (180,912)
Accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities.......... 172,819 (616,318)
Deferred revenue........................................ 351,018 96,929
----------- -----------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... (4,208,591) (7,241,405)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property and equipment, net..................... (276,158) (371,310)
Purchase of third party licenses, net....................... -- (163,846)
Purchase of Purchased Software.............................. -- (685,351)
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities....................... (276,158) (1,220,507)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on long-term debt and third-party
licenses.................................................. (25,136) (55,830)
Proceeds from common stock issued upon exercise of stock
options................................................... 317,812 201,017
Proceeds from common stock issued under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan............................................. 108,257 71,020
Proceeds from private placements, net....................... 19,722,411 --
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities................... 20,123,344 216,207
Currency translation effect on cash and cash equivalents.... 28,357 (37,253)
----------- -----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents........ 15,666,952 (8,282,958)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period............ 6,420,686 14,703,644
----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.................. $22,087,638 $ 6,420,686
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-6
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
White Pine Software, Inc. and its subsidiary ("the Company") operates in one
business segment, which develops, markets and supports multi-platform desktop
multimedia software that facilitates worldwide video and audio communication and
data collaboration across the Internet, intranets and other networks using
Internet protocol.
The Company markets and sells its products in the United States, Canada,
Europe, and the Pacific Rim through distributors, a combination of strategic
partners and OEMs, and its direct sales organization, as well as over the
Internet.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned foreign subsidiary, White Pine Software, Europe. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and investments in high
grade commercial paper having maturities of three months or less when purchased.
These investments have been categorized as held to maturity under the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN
INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES. Accordingly, the balances are stated
at amortized cost, which approximates fair value, because of the short maturity
of these instruments.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets except trademark are amortized on a straight line basis
over three to five years. Trademark is amortized over twelve years.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and
accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents include cash on deposit in
checking accounts, commercial paper, and overnight repurchase agreements. These
cash and cash equivalents are maintained with high credit quality financial
institutions.
The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and
generally requires no collateral. The Company maintains reserves for potential
credit losses; historically, such losses have not
F-7
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
been material and have been within management's expectations. Two customers
accounted for approximately 38% and 59% of accounts receivable at December 31,
1999 and 1998.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for the Company's cash
and cash equivalents and borrowings approximates fair value.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or
market.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are being depreciated using
the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of two
to seven years. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and are being
amortized over the lesser of the term of the lease or the estimated useful life
of the asset.
Included in the Company's balance sheet at December 31, 1999 and 1998 are
the assets of the Company's foreign subsidiary, White Pine Software, Europe, of
which $186,000 and $254,000 of tangible assets are located in France.
ACCOUNTING FOR IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"ACCOUNTING FOR IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS," the Company will record
impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of
impairment are present. On an on-going basis, management reviews the value and
period of amortization or depreciation of long-lived assets. During this review,
the Company reevaluates the significant assumptions used in determining the
original cost of long-lived assets. Although the assumptions may vary from
transaction to transaction, they generally include revenue growth, operating
results, cash flows, and other indicators of value. Management then determines
whether there has been a permanent impairment of the value of long-lived assets
based upon events or circumstances, which have occurred since acquisition. To
date, there have been no impairment losses recorded.
THIRD-PARTY LICENSES
The cost of agreements entered into with third parties for the right to use
the third parties' technology in the Company's products is amortized on a
straight-line basis over the lives of the agreements, or the expected life of
technology, whichever is less.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences
between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse.
F-8
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company's revenue is derived from software license fees and fees for
services related to its software products, primarily software maintenance fees.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of AICPA
Statement of Position No. 97-2, SOFTWARE REVENUE RECOGNITION, as amended.
Software license revenue is recognized upon receipt of a firm customer order
and shipment of the software, net of allowances for estimated future returns,
provided that no significant obligations remain on the part of the Company and
collection of the related receivable is deemed probable.
Software maintenance fees, which are generally payable in advance and are
non-refundable, are recognized ratably over the period of the maintenance
contract, typically twelve months. Revenue from training and consulting services
is recognized as services are provided.
Software license fees, consulting fees, and training fees that have been
prepaid or invoiced but that do not yet qualify for recognition as revenue under
the Company's policy, and prepaid maintenance fees not yet recognized as
revenue, are reflected as deferred revenue.
CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE
Software development costs meeting recoverability test are capitalized under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, ACCOUNTING FOR THE COSTS OF
COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO BE SOLD, LEASED OR OTHERWISE MARKETED. The cost of software
capitalized is amortized based on its estimated economic life.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" (SFAS 128). SFAS 128
requires calculation and presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of warrants, stock
options or other type securities. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based
on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive
effect of stock options, warrants and related securities calculated using the
treasury stock method. Dilutive securities are excluded from the diluted
earnings per share calculation if their effect is antidilutive.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiary have been
translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 52, FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION. All balance sheet
amounts have been translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date. Statement of operations amounts have been translated using average
exchange rates. The gains and losses resulting from the changes in exchange
rates from the date of acquisition of White Pine Software, Europe to December
31, 1999, have been reported separately as a component of stockholders' equity.
The aggregate transaction gains and losses are insignificant for all periods
presented.
F-9
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
ADVERTISING COSTS
All costs related to advertising the Company's products are expensed in the
period incurred. Amounts charged to expense were $252,000 and $655,000, during
the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Statement of Position 98-9, MODIFICATION OF SOP 97-2, SOFTWARE REVENUE
RECOGNITION, WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS, modifies certain provisions
of Statement of Position 97-2. The Company's accounting policy on software
revenue recognition currently is in compliance with Statement 97-2, as amended
by Statement of Position 98-9, and adoption of this Statement of Position has
not had a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of
the Company.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133.
"ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES," which
establishes standards for the recognition, measurement, and reporting of
derivatives and hedging activities and is effective for the Company's year
ending December 31, 2001. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this new
accounting standard will not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
2. TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITIONS
ACQUISITION FROM LABTAM COMMUNICATIONS PTY. LTD.
On July 8, 1998 the Company purchased certain assets, including intellectual
property, comprising certain T.120 whiteboarding and data collaboration
technology from Labtam Communications Pty. Ltd. The purchase price for these
assets consisted of 900,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock and cash
payments of U.S.$628,000 in July 1998 and A$201,606 (or U.S.$133,000) in January
1999. The Company recorded capitalized software of $2,641,000 in connection with
the acquisition, consisting of (i) $1,828,000 attributable to the Common Stock
issued in the acquisition, based upon the Common Stock's closing price of $2.03
on July 8, 1998, (ii) the two cash payments totaling $761,000 and (iii) $52,000
of accounting, legal and other fees incurred in connection with the acquisition.
ACQUISITION FROM CORNELL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
During 1998, the Company obtained certain trademark and intellectual
property rights to CU-SeeMe and the underlying MeetingPoint technology from
Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. The purchase price for these rights consisted
of (i) a note in the principal amount of $900,000, of which $300,000 is due on
each of June 30,2000, June 30, 2001 and June 30, 2002, and (ii) warrants to
purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at a price of $1.00 per
share. The Company recorded as trademark a total of $964,500 in connection with
the acquisition, consisting of the $900,000 principal amount of the long-term
note and $64,500 attributable to the warrants, which were valued in accordance
with SFAS 123. The warrants were issued in exchange for outstanding warrants
issued previously to Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.; these prior warrants had
an exchange price of $6.00 per share but otherwise had terms substantially
identical to those of the new warrants.
F-10
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
2. TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The acquired trademark rights were capitalized and are being amortized over
their estimated economic life of twelve years.
As a result of the acquisition, the Company recorded as capitalized software
a total of $500,000 previously recorded as prepaid royalties.
3. FINANCINGS
In December 1999, the Company received approximately $20 million from four
different investors through the issuance of 1,302,084 shares of its common
stock. The shares were sold at a price of $15.36 per share, which was the 30-day
weighted average closing price of the common stock at the date the terms of the
financings were negotiated.
4. INDEBTEDNESS
LINE OF CREDIT
On March 31, 1999, the Company terminated its commercial loan agreement with
a financial institution, which had provided for a $1,000,000 revolving line of
credit.
LONG TERM DEBT
Debt obligations consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Secured, non-interest bearing, term loan from a foreign
governmental agency, due in annual installments of
$44,408, with the final installment due in September
1999...................................................... $ -- $16,000
Note payable, due in monthly installments of $883 plus
interest at 9.5%, with remaining balances due August
2000...................................................... 7,000 17,000
------ -------
7,000 33,000
Less current portion........................................ 7,000 26,000
------ -------
$ -- $ 7,000
====== =======
</TABLE>
Total interest expense for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, was
approximately $3,000 and $4,000, respectively, and is included in other expense.
F-11
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
5. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Accrued compensation and related benefits............ $1,001,000 $ 647,000
Pending litigation................................... -- 51,000
Royalties............................................ 106,000 246,000
Other accruals....................................... 1,147,000 611,000
---------- ----------
$2,254,000 $1,555,000
========== ==========
</TABLE>
In prior years, the Company was a co-defendant in various lawsuits that
sought damages for alleged injuries sustained while using products which the
plaintiffs assert were designed and manufactured by a predecessor company. The
Company reduced its reserve for pending lawsuits from $291,000 to $51,000 as of
December 31, 1998, in recognition of the fact that all but two lawsuits had been
resolved. The Company reversed the final $51,000 reserve upon notification that
the two remaining lawsuits had been dismissed during 1999. Subsequent to this
transaction, there are no outstanding lawsuits against the Company.
6. INCOME TAXES
The Company's deferred tax assets and related valuation allowances are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
1999 1998
------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets................................ $ 10,150,000 $8,866,000
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets........ (10,150,000) (8,866,000)
------------ ----------
Net deferred tax asset............................. $ -- $ --
============ ==========
</TABLE>
Deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss carryforwards
and accrued liabilities.
The Company recorded a valuation allowance of $10,150,000 and $8,866,000 at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, against its deferred tax assets since
it is believed to be more likely than not that the net operating loss
carryforwards and other temporary differences will not provide a future tax
benefit.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had cumulative federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $26,848,000 for income tax purposes. The
availability of the net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable
income is subject to significant annual limitations. The loss carryforwards
expire at various dates through 2020.
F-12
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
7. LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Company leases its office facilities under various operating leases
expiring at various times through fiscal 2001. Future minimum annual rental
commitments under the lease agreements for the years ending December 31 are as
follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
2000........................................................ $253,000
2001........................................................ 178,000
--------
$431,000
--------
</TABLE>
Total rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, was
approximately $229,000 and $253,000, respectively.
8. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND GEOGRAPHICAL SALES
During the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, two customers accounted
for approximately 13% and 35%, respectively, of the Company's total revenue.
The Company's sales by geographic location are summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1999 1998
----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
United States and Canada............................ $ 9,494,000 $5,887,000
Europe.............................................. 1,533,000 1,449,000
Pacific Rim......................................... 975,000 457,000
----------- ----------
$12,002,000 $7,793,000
=========== ==========
</TABLE>
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
401(K) PLAN
The Company has a Profit Sharing Plan (the "Plan") under Section 401(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code for all employees meeting age and service
requirements. Eligible employees may elect to contribute up to 16% of their
compensation, subject to limitations established by the Internal Revenue Code.
The Company may elect to contribute a discretionary amount to the Plan which
would be allocated to the employees based upon the employees' contributions to
the Plan. There have been no discretionary contributions to date.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In 1996 the Company adopted the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"ESPP"). Under the ESPP, an aggregate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock are
reserved for purchase by qualified employees, at 85% of the appropriate market
price. On December 16, 1998, the Board of Directors amended the total shares of
the ESPP plan to 200,000 shares and deleted a provision that had prohibited
certain "highly compensated" officers of the Company from participating in the
ESPP. The ESPP provides that qualified employees may authorize payroll
deductions from 1% to 6% of their base pay to purchase shares at the lower of
the market price in effect on the day the offering starts or the
F-13
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
day the offering terminates. In 1998, the company issued 56,402 shares. 17,474
shares were issued at $2.23 per share, and 38,928 shares were issued at $0.82
per share. In 1999, the company issued 61,635 shares. 48,500 shares were issued
at $0.82 per share, and 13,135 shares were issued at $5.10 per share.
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principals Board Opinion No.
25, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES ("APB 25") and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as
discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under FASB
statement No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION, requires use of
option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee
stock options. No compensation expense is recognized under APB 25, because the
exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price
of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
1996 INCENTIVE AND NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
In 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan (the "1996 Plan").
Under the 1996 Plan, 550,000 shares of Common Stock are available for grant to
employees. On September 30, 1997 the Company amended the 1996 Plan increase the
number of available shares from 550,000 to 1,000,000. Option prices and exercise
periods are determined by the Board of Directors on the date of grant. All
options granted under the Stock Option Plan become exercisable in installments
over a three to four year period commencing from the date of grant and expire
ten years from the date of grant.
1997 DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN
In 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Outside Director Stock Option Plan
(the "Director's Plan"). The Company has reserved 150,000 shares of Common Stock
under the Director's Plan. The Director's Plan authorizes a one-time automatic
grant of options to acquire 15,000 shares of Common Stock as an initial award
for being a Director. Each subsequent year, at re-election, directors are
granted an additional 10,000 options. All options granted are exercisable at the
next annual meeting subsequent to being granted. All options expire ten years
from the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value
of the Company's Common Stock on the date of grant.
SFAS 123 DISCLOSURES
Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per common and common
equivalent share is required by Statement 123, which also requires that the
information be determined as if the Company has accounted for its employee stock
options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994 under the fair
F-14
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
value method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated
at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS ESPP
------------------- -------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Expected life (years)....................................... 4.66 4.05 0.50 0.50
Interest rate............................................... 5.75% 5.50% 5.75% 5.5%
Volatility.................................................. 1.23 0.97 1.23 0.97
</TABLE>
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information is as follows (in thousands except for per share
information):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Pro forma net loss........................................ $(5,474) $(8,925)
Pro forma net loss per share:
basic and diluted....................................... $ (0.52) $ (0.91)
</TABLE>
Option activity under the Company's stock option plans is summarized below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---------------------------- ----------------------------
WEIGHTED AVERAGE WEIGHTED AVERAGE
SHARES EXERCISE PRICE SHARES EXERCISE PRICE
--------- ---------------- --------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of year......... 1,108,644 $1.88 1,408,248 $2.65
Granted.................................. 895,000 17.51 492,650 1.82
Expired or canceled...................... (121,910) 12.05 (594,143) 4.12
Exercised................................ (225,530) 1.41 (198,111) 1.01
--------- ----- --------- -----
Outstanding at end of year............... 1,656,204 9.63 1,108,644 1.88
========= ===== ========= =====
Exercisable at end of year............... 471,190 2.00 462,828 $1.67
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE>
WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
DECEMBER 31, 1999
9. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (CONTINUED)
The following table presents weighted-average price and fair value
information about options granted at fair market value during fiscal years 1999
and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
OPTIONS WEIGHTED-AVERAGE WEIGHTED-AVERAGE FAIR
EXERCISE PRICE ON DATE OF GRANT GRANTED EXERCISE PRICE VALUE
------------------------------- --------- ---------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1999
Equal to fair market value....................... 895,000 $17.51 $14.78
Less than fair market value...................... -- N/A N/A
-------
895,000
=======
1998
Equal to fair market value....................... 492,650 $ 1.82 $ 1.29
Less than fair market value...................... -- N/A N/A
-------
492,650
=======
</TABLE>
The following table presents weighted-average price and life information
about significant option groups outstanding at December 31, 1999 and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
RANGE OF NUMBER REMAINING EXERCISE NUMBER EXERCISE
EXERCISE PRICES OUTSTANDING CONTRACTUAL LIFE PRICE EXERCISABLE PRICE
--------------- ----------- ---------------- -------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999
$0.50 - $1.875 542,107 7.35 years $1.46 228,582 $1.16
2.00 - 2.50 338,872 7.42 years 2.45 187,508 2.45
2.625 - 7.875 249,225 9.05 years 4.35 55,100 3.99
8.75 - 25.50 526,000 9.96 years 25.19 -- --
-------------- --------- -------
1,656,204 471,190
========= =======
1998
$0.50 - $.80 185,392 2.55 years $0.53 185,392 $0.53
0.84 - 1.25 171,454 8.74 years 1.15 37,954 1.00
1.50 - 1.88 254,300 9.69 years 1.85 18,500 1.50
2.00 - 2.63 439,148 8.29 years 2.43 178,445 2.36
3.75 - 7.88 58,300 8.58 years 4.38 42,537 4.39
--------- -------
1,108,644 462,828
========= =======
</TABLE>
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company sold the assets of its legacy connectivity business to an
Australian company on February 29, 2000 for $1,000,000 in cash and 467,730
ordinary shares of the Australian company. These shares were valued at U.S.
$500,000 on February 29, 2000. The gain generated from this sale will be
calculated in the first quarter of 2000.
F-16
<PAGE>
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2000 1999
--------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents............................... $21,561 $22,088
Investment.............................................. 500 --
Accounts receivable, net................................ 4,955 4,159
Inventories............................................. 138 54
Prepaid expenses and other current assets............... 335 317
------- -------
Total current assets.................................. 27,489 26,618
Property and equipment, net............................... 1,751 1,160
Third party licenses, net................................. 495 560
Purchased Software, net................................... 2,326 2,533
Trademark, net............................................ 851 871
Goodwill, net............................................. 139 199
Other long term assets.................................... 121 106
------- -------
Total assets................................................ $33,172 $32,047
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses................... $ 2,778 $ 2,973
Deferred revenue........................................ 702 695
Current portion of long-term debt....................... 4 7
------- -------
Total current liabilities............................. 3,484 3,675
Other long-term liabilities............................... 600 600
Stockholders' equity...................................... 29,088 27,772
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................. $33,172 $32,047
======= =======
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-17
<PAGE>
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------
MARCH 31, 2000 APRIL 2, 1999
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Software license fees..................................... $ 3,595 $ 2,186
Services and other........................................ 497 273
----------- -----------
Total revenue........................................... 4,092 2,459
Cost of revenue............................................. 992 514
----------- -----------
Gross profit................................................ 3,100 1,945
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing....................................... 1,869 1,598
Research and development.................................. 1,350 1,177
General and administrative................................ 952 515
----------- -----------
Total operating expenses................................ 4,171 3,290
----------- -----------
Loss from operations........................................ (1,071) (1,345)
Other income (expense):
Interest income, net...................................... 254 70
Gain from asset sale...................................... 776 --
Other, net................................................ (15) (29)
----------- -----------
Total other income, net................................. 1,015 41
=========== ===========
Net loss.................................................... $ (56) $ (1,304)
=========== ===========
Net loss per share: Basic and Diluted....................... $ (0.00) $ (0.12)
=========== ===========
Weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding: Basic
and Diluted............................................... 12,085,675 10,480,093
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-18
<PAGE>
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------
MARCH 31, 2000 APRIL 2, 1999
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss.................................................... $ (56) $(1,304)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation.............................................. 128 206
Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangibles........ 352 167
Amortization of deferred stock compensation............... 58 --
Gain from asset sale of Hosting Connectivity business..... (776) --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable..................................... (933) (528)
Inventories............................................. (131) (12)
Prepaid expenses........................................ 2 29
Other assets............................................ (39) 71
Accounts payable........................................ 205 (59)
Accrued expenses and other accrued liabilities.......... (385) (401)
Deferred revenue........................................ 168 (7)
-------- -------
Net cash used in operating activities....................... (1,407) (1,838)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property and equipment, net..................... (742) (98)
Proceeds received from Hosting Connectivity asset sale...... 985 --
-------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities......... 243 (98)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal payments on long-term debt and third-party
licenses.................................................. (2) (2)
Proceeds from common stock issued upon exercise of stock
options................................................... 667 25
-------- -------
Net cash provided by financing activities................... 665 23
Currency translation effect on cash and cash equivalents.... (28) 66
-------- -------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents................... (527) (1,847)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period............ 22,088 6,421
-------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.................. $ 21,561 $ 4,574
======== =======
Non-cash investing activity: common stock received as
partial consideration for Hosting Connectivity asset
sale...................................................... $500,000 --
</TABLE>
SEE NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
F-19
<PAGE>
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
MARCH 31, 2000
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
We develop software solutions that facilitate worldwide video and audio
communication and data collaboration across the Internet, intranets, extranets
and other networks using the Internet Protocol (IP). Our CU-SeeMe Web product
provides the industry's first multipoint video instant messaging over the
Internet. Our CU-SeeMe Pro and MeetingPoint create a client-server solution that
allows multiple users to participate simultaneously in conferences over the
Internet. ClassPoint is a MeetingPoint add-on that provides a complete solution
for corporate training and distance learning. We support multiple platforms,
including Windows 95, 98 and NT, Sun Solaris, and Red Hat Linux. Our web site is
located at www.cuseeme.com. CU-SeeMe Web can be experienced at
www.world.cuseeme.com. Information contained in our web site is not a part of
this Annual Report.
We are targeting increased distribution of our client software. Targeting
Internet service providers, portal sites, and enterprises, we will sell either a
complete end-to-end solution for Internet communications or Internet
communications services whereby the customer pays a recurring fee to
video/audio-enable and maintain its web site.
On May 8, 2000, we changed our company name from White Pine Software, Inc.
to CUseeMe Networks, Inc.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and investments in high
grade commercial paper having maturities of three months or less when purchased.
These investments have been categorized as held to maturity under the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, ACCOUNTING FOR CERTAIN
INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES. Accordingly, the balances are stated
at amortized cost, which approximates fair value, because of the short maturity
of these instruments.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Our revenue is derived from software license fees and fees for services
related to our software products, primarily software maintenance fees. We
recognize revenue in accordance with the provisions of AICPA Statement of
Position No. 97-2, SOFTWARE REVENUE RECOGNITION, as amended.
Software license revenue is recognized upon our receipt of a firm customer
order and shipment of the software, net of allowances for estimated future
returns, provided that no significant obligations remain on our part and
collection of the related receivable is deemed probable.
Software maintenance fees, which are generally payable in advance and are
non-refundable, are recognized ratably over the period of the maintenance
contract, typically twelve months. Revenue from training and consulting services
is recognized as services are provided.
Software license fees, consulting fees, and training fees that have been
prepaid or invoiced but that do not yet qualify for recognition as revenue under
our policy, and prepaid maintenance fees not yet recognized as revenue, are
reflected as deferred revenue.
F-20
<PAGE>
[LOGO]
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 24. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law affords a Delaware
corporation the power to indemnify its present and former directors and officers
under certain conditions. Article SEVENTH of the charter of CUseeMe
Networks, Inc. (formerly White Pine Software, Inc.) (the "Company") provides
that the Company shall indemnify each person who at any time is, or shall have
been, a director or officer of the Company, and is threatened to be or is made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding,
whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact
that he or she is, or was, a director or officer of the Company, or is or was
serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, trustee,
or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement incurred in connection with any such action, suit or
proceeding to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation
Law.
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law gives a Delaware
corporation the power to adopt a charter provision eliminating or limiting the
personal liability of directors to the corporation or its stockholders for
breach of fiduciary duty as directors, provided that such provision may not
eliminate or limit the liability of directors for (a) any breach of the
director's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (b) any acts
or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law, (c) any payment of a dividend or approval of a stock
purchase that is illegal under Section 174 of the Delaware Corporation Law or
(d) any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit. Article NINTH of the Company's charter provides that to the maximum
extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, no director of the
Company shall be personally liable to the Company or to any of its stockholders
for monetary damages arising out of such director's breach of fiduciary duty as
a director of the Company. No amendment to or repeal of the provisions of
Article NINTH shall apply to or have any effect of the liability or the alleged
liability of any director of the Company with respect to any act or failure to
act of such director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal. A principal
effect of such Article NINTH is to limit or eliminate the potential liability of
our directors for monetary damages arising from breaches of their duty of care,
unless the breach involves one of the four exceptions described in (a) through
(d) above.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law also affords a Delaware
corporation the power to obtain insurance on behalf of its directors and
officers against liabilities incurred by them in those capacities. The Company
has procured a directors' and officers' liability and company reimbursement
liability insurance policy that (a) insures directors and officers of the
Company against losses (above a deductible amount) arising from certain claims
made against them by reason of certain acts done or attempted by such directors
or officers and (b) insures the Company against losses (above a deductible
amount) arising from any such claims, but only if the Company is required or
permitted to indemnify such directors or officers for such losses under
statutory or common law or under provisions of the Company's charter or by-laws.
II-1
<PAGE>
ITEM 25. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following table sets forth the various expenses to be paid by the
Company in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being
registered, other than sales commissions. All amounts shown are estimates except
for amounts of filing and listing fees.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Filing fee of SEC........................................... $ 7,778
Listing fee of Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc..................... 17,500
Accounting fees and expenses................................ 10,000
Blue sky fees and expenses (including related legal fees)... 1,500
Legal fees and expenses..................................... 30,000
Printing and engraving expenses............................. 30,000
Miscellaneous............................................... 3,222
--------
Total..................................................... $100,000
========
</TABLE>
ITEM 26. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
The following information is furnished with regard to all securities sold by
the Company within the past three years that were not registered under the
Securities Act.
- In May 1997, the Company issued to DataBeam Corporation a total of 11,111
shares of common stock. The shares were issued as partial payment for use
of its server program.
- In July 1998, the Company issued to Labtam Communications Pty. Ltd. a
total of 900,000 shares of common stock. The shares were issued as part of
the consideration for intellectual property purchased by the Company from
Labtam Communications Pty. Ltd.
- In November 1998, the Company issued to Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.
a warrant to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00
per share. The warrant was issued as part of the consideration for
intellectual property purchased by the Company from Cornell Research
Foundation, Inc. and for the cancelation of a previously outstanding
warrant that had been issued by the Company to Cornell Research
Foundation, Inc.
- In December 1999, the Company sold the following numbers of shares of
common stock to the parties named below. All of the shares were sold at a
price of $15.36 per share.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES
PURCHASER PURCHASED
--------- ---------
<S> <C>
CFE, Inc.................................................... 325,521
Private Equity Holding (Caymen) Ltd......................... 325,521
Jayvee & Co A/C YARF 1208002
CIBC Mellon Global Securities............................. 162,760
Jayvee & Co A/C YARF 1203002
CIBC Mellon Global Securities............................. 99,886
Royal Trust Corp. of Canada In Trust for Account 27396004... 62,875
Special Situations Private Equity Fund, LP.................. 78,125
Special Situations Cayman Fund, L.P......................... 65,104
Special Situations Fund III, L.P............................ 182,292
---------
Total..................................................... 1,302,084
=========
</TABLE>
The issuances described above were made in reliance upon the exemptions from
registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act relating to sales
by an issuer not involving any public offering. None of the foregoing
transactions involved a distribution or public offering. No underwriters were
engaged in connection with the foregoing issuances of securities, and no
underwriting commissions or discounts were paid.
II-2
<PAGE>
ITEM 27. EXHIBITS
(a) EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
----------- ------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
3.1(1)(7) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
registrant, as further amended
3.2(1) Amended and Restated By-Laws of the registrant
4.1(7) Specimen certificate for common stock of the registrant
5.1* Opinion of Hale and Dorr LLP
10.1(1) Stock Option Plan (1993), as amended of the registrant
10.2(1) Stock Option Plan (1994), as amended of the registrant
10.3(1) Stock Option Plan (1995), as amended of the registrant
10.4(1) Stock Option Plan (1996), as amended of the registrant
10.5(1) 1996 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan of the
registrant
10.6(4) 1996 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
the registrant
10.7(3) 1997 Director Stock Option Plan of the registrant
10.8(1) Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 19, 1996 among certain
investors and the registrant, as amended
10.9(1) Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 17, 1996 between J.F.
Shea, Co., Inc. and the registrant, as amended
10.10(1) Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated
March 19, 1996 among certain stockholders of the registrant
and the registrant, as amended
10.11(6) Stock purchase agreements dated December 1999 between the
registrant and the investors identified therein
10.12(5) Sale of Assets Agreement dated as of July 6, 1998 by and
among the registrant, Labtam Communications Pty. Ltd.,
Creative Software Technologies Pty. Ltd., Dawson Noy Johns
and Anthony James Oxley
10.13(4) Technology Transfer Agreement dated as of November 11, 1998
between the registrant and Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.
10.14(2) Standard Office Lease-Gross (American Industrial Real Estate
Association) dated October 24, 1996 by and between PBP
Limited Partnership, as lessor and the registrant, as lessee
10.15(1) Nondisclosure and Noncompetition Agreement dated February
15, 1996 with David O. Bundy
10.16(3) Severance Agreement dated March 16, 1998 between the
registrant and Robert Hadden
10.17(4) Letter agreement dated August 5, 1997 between the registrant
and Christine J. Cox
10.18(1) Indenture of Lease dated May 15, 1996 by Nash-Tamposi
Limited Partnership, Ballinger Properties L.L.C. and the
registrant
10.19(6) Consulting Agreement dated as of February 17, 2000 between
the registrant and Arthur H. Bruno
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
23.2* Consent of Hale and Dorr LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)
</TABLE>
II-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
----------- ------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
24.1* Power of Attorney (contained on page II-5 of the
registration statement as originally filed)
27.1(4) Financial Data Schedule for year ended December 31, 1999
27.2(8) Financial Data Schedule for the three months ended
March 31, 2000
</TABLE>
------------------------
(1) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (File No. 333-09525) in the form in which it was declared effective by
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 23, 1998.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Registration statement on Form
SB-2 (File No. 333-95541) in the form it was declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on May 9, 2000.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the three months ended March 31, 2000.
(b) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Report of Independent Accountants
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the related
notes.
ITEM 28. UNDERTAKINGS.
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to :
(1) File, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, a
post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement to;
(i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) for the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act");
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which,
individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the
information set forth in the Registration Statement; and
(iii) Include any additional changed material information on the plan
of distribution.
(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each such
post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the
securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be
the initial BONA FIDE offering thereof.
(3) File a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the
securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
II-4
<PAGE>
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small
business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small
business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a
claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by
the small business issuer of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person of the small business issuer in the successful defense of any
action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the small business
issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the
question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
II-5
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
Registrant certifies that it has authorized this Amendment to Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in the City of Nashua,
New Hampshire on June 26, 2000.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
CUSEEME NETWORKS, INC.
By: /s/ KILLKO A. CABALLERO
-----------------------------------------
Killko A. Caballero
President and Chief Executive Officer
</TABLE>
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment to Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in
the capacities indicated on June 26, 2000.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<C> <S>
/s/ KILLKO A. CABALLERO President, Chief Executive Officer and
------------------------------------------- Chairman (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Killko A. Caballero
/s/ CHRISTINE J. COX Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
------------------------------------------- Finance, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
Christine J. Cox (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
* Director
-------------------------------------------
Joseph J. Esposito
* Director
-------------------------------------------
Jonathan G. Morgan
* Director
-------------------------------------------
Adam Stettner
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
/s/ KILLKO A. CABALLERO
---------------------------------------
Killko A. Caballero
*By: Attorney-in-fact
</TABLE>
II-6
