<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
[ _ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
For the transition period from to
-------------- --------------
Commission File No. 0-28442
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
-----------------------------
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Illinois 37-1356594
- --------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
318 South Park Avenue, Herrin, Illinois 62948-3604
- ---------------------------------------- --------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (618) 942-7373
--------------
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
---------------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Check here if no disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]
The issuer's revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 were
$4,629,000.
Based on the most recent sale of the common stock at a price of $15.25 per
share, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates on
March 17, 1997 was $9,048,206. For purposes of this calculation, it is assumed
that directors, officers, the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan and the
Company's Management Recognition Plan are affiliates. On such date, 876,875
shares of the common stock were issued and 876,875 shares outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ _ ] No [ X ]
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Proxy Statement for 1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. (Part III)
<PAGE>
PART I
Item 1. Description of Business
- --------------------------------
General
The Company. Heartland Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Illinois in January 1996 at the
direction of the Board of Directors of the First Federal Savings and Loan
Association of Herrin (the "Association") for the purpose of serving first as a
savings institution holding company for the Association upon its conversion from
mutual to stock form (the "Conversion"), and then as a bank holding company upon
the subsequent conversion of the Association to a national bank (the "Bank
Conversion") known as Heartland National Bank (the "Bank"). On June 28, 1996,
the Conversion and the Bank Conversion were consummated and the Company
completed its initial public offering of its common stock. A total of 876,875
shares were sold at $10.00 per share. Net proceeds from the offering, after
deducting expenses and the funds necessary to fund the Company's employee stock
ownership plan ("ESOP"), amounted to approximately $7.4 million. Unless
otherwise stated herein, references to the Bank refer to the Bank and its
predecessor, the Association. The Company is registered with and subject to the
regulation and supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (the "Federal Reserve Board") as a bank holding company under the Bank
Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHCA").
The Company's principal business is overseeing the business of the Bank
and investing the portion of the net proceeds from its initial public offering
retained by it. The Company has no significant assets other than its investment
in the Bank, a loan to the ESOP and certain cash and cash equivalents and
investment securities. Accordingly, the information set forth herein, relates
primarily to the Bank. At December 31, 1996, the Company had consolidated total
assets of $65.9 million, deposits of $52.8 million and stockholders' equity of
$12.6 million.
The Company's executive offices are located at 318 South Park Avenue,
Herrin, Illinois 62948-3604, and its main telephone number is (618) 942-7373.
The Bank. The principal business of the Bank historically has consisted
of attracting deposits from the general public and investing these deposits in
loans secured by first mortgages on single-family residences in its market area.
At December 31, 1996, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans comprised
78.82% of the Bank's total loan portfolio. The Bank derives its income
principally from interest earned on loans and, to a lesser extent, interest
earned on mortgage-backed and related securities and investment securities and
noninterest income. Funds for these activities are provided principally by
operating revenues, deposits, and repayments of outstanding loans and
mortgage-backed and related securities.
The Bank's deposits are insured by the Savings Association Insurance
Fund ("SAIF") up to the applicable limits for each depositor. The Bank is
subject to comprehensive examination, supervision, and regulation by the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation ("FDIC"). This regulation is intended primarily for the protection
of depositors. The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago.
Recent Developments
SAIF Assessment. During the quarter ended September 30, 1996, the
Company incurred a charge of $351,000 as the result of the imposition of a
special assessment by the FDIC to recapitalize the SAIF. The FDIC operates two
deposit insurance funds: the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") which generally insures
the deposits of commercial banks and the SAIF which generally insures the
deposits of savings associations. Since the Bank was originally chartered as a
savings association, its deposits are insured by the SAIF rather than the BIF.
Because the reserves of the SAIF have been below statutorily required minimums,
institutions with SAIF-assessable deposits, like the Bank, have been required to
pay substantially higher deposit insurance premiums than institutions with
deposits insured by the BIF for the past several semi-annual periods. In order
to recapitalize the SAIF and address the premium disparity, the recently-enacted
Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 authorized the FDIC to impose a one-
2
<PAGE>
time special assessment on institutions with SAIF-assessable deposits based on
the amount determined by the FDIC to be necessary to increase the reserve levels
of the SAIF to the designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of insured deposits.
Institutions were assessed at the rate of 65.7 basis points based on the amount
of their SAIF-assessable deposits as of March 31, 1995.
The FDIC has adopted a new assessment schedule for SAIF deposit
insurance pursuant to which the assessment rate for institutions in the lowest
risk assessment classification would be reduced to zero and institutions in the
highest risk assessment classification will be assessed at the rate of 27 basis
points. Until December 31, 1999, however, SAIF-insured institutions, will be
required to pay assessments to the FDIC at the rate of 6.5 basis points to help
fund interest payments on certain bonds issued by the Financing Corporation
("FICO"), an agency of the federal government established to finance takeovers
of insolvent thrifts. During this period, BIF members will be assessed for FICO
obligations at the rate of 1.3 basis points. After December 31, 1999, both BIF
and SAIF members will be assessed at the same rate for FICO payments.
The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 provides that the BIF and the
SAIF will be merged into a single Deposit Insurance Fund effective December 31,
1999 but only if there are no insured savings associations on that date. The
legislation directs the Department of Treasury to make recommendations to
Congress by March 31, 1997 for the establishment of a single charter for banks
and thrifts.
Bad Debt Recapture. Prior to the Association's decision to convert to a
stock institution and national bank, the Association computed its income taxes
allowing for the effect of the favorable bad debt deduction available to a
savings and loan association under the Internal Revenue Code if certain
conditions are met. Based upon the Association's decision to convert to bank
status, the law in effect at that time required that the entire amount of excess
bad debt deductions referred to above be restored to income, and taxes thereon
became due. As a result, income taxes totaling $450,000 were accrued in the year
ended December 31, 1995 as a component of income tax expense. This accrual
recognized a deferred liability for the tax effect of bad debt reserves not
previously recorded (those arising before 1988).
During the third quarter of 1996, the Small Business Job Protection Act
of 1996 (Small Business Act) was enacted into law. Under this law, for years
beginning after 1995, thrift institutions (such as the Association) are required
to recapture "excess bad debt reserves" over a six-year period. However,
pre-1988 reserves are not included in these excess bad debt reserves. As the
Bank Conversion had not taken place as of December 31, 1995 (the effective date
of the new law), the Bank was still a thrift institution as of that date.
Therefore, it is the current judgment of management that, due to the change
enacted by the Small Business Act, the pre-1988 reserves will not be required to
be recaptured into taxable income. As a result, in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting
for Income Taxes", the $450,000 increase in income taxes made during 1995 was
reversed during the quarter ended September 30, 1996 as a change to income from
continuing operations, leading to a $450,000 decrease in income tax expense and
deferred income taxes as of September 30, 1996.
Lending Activities
General. The Bank's gross loan portfolio totaled $42.1 million at
December 31, 1996, representing 63.97% of the Company's total assets at that
date. It is the Bank's policy to concentrate its lending within the counties of
Williamson, Jackson and Franklin located in southeastern Illinois. At December
31, 1996, $33.2 million, or 78.9%, of the Bank's total loan portfolio, consisted
of one- to four-family, residential mortgage loans. At December 31, 1996, other
loans secured by real estate included multi-family residential real estate
loans, which amounted to $1.5 million, or 3.6%, of the Bank's total loan
portfolio, church loans, which amounted to $1.9 million, or 4.5%, of the Bank's
total loan portfolio, commercial real estate loans which amounted to $2.6
million, or 6.3%, of the Bank's total loan portfolio and construction loans
which amounted to $1.0 million, or 2.4%, of the Bank's gross loan portfolio.
3
<PAGE>
The Bank also is active in the origination of consumer loans, which
primarily consist of loans secured by savings deposits, home improvement loans
and automobile loans. Consumer loans amounted to $1.9 million, or 4.5% of the
Bank's total loan portfolio, at December 31, 1996.
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth selected
data relating to the composition of the Bank's loan portfolio by type of loan at
the dates indicated. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had no concentrations of
loans exceeding 10% of total loans other than as disclosed below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31,
---------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
---------------------- ------------------------
Amount % Amount %
------ ---- ------ ----
(Dollars in thousands)
Type of Loan:
- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential ............. $ 33,208 78.82% $ 29,890 82.21%
Multi-family residential .................... 1,520 3.61 1,257 3.46
Construction ................................ 1,010 2.40 1,404 3.86
Church ...................................... 1,875 4.45 1,705 4.68
Commercial .................................. 2,633 6.25 766 2.11
------------- ------- ------------- -------
Total real estate loans ................... 40,246 95.53 35,022 96.32
------------- ------- ------------- -------
Consumer loans:
Automobiles ................................. 346 .82 236 0.65
Savings account ............................. 503 1.20 524 1.44
Home improvement ............................ 490 1.16 249 0.68
Other ....................................... 545 1.29 329 0.91
------------- ------- ------------- -------
Total consumer loans ..................... 1,884 4.47 1,338 3.68
------------- ------- ------------- -------
Total gross loans ........................ 42,130 100.00% 36,360 100.00%
------------- ======= ------------- =======
Less:
Loans in process ............................ 267 873
Deferred service charge ..................... 97 127
Allowance for loan losses ................... 300 300
------------- -------------
Total .................................... $ 41,466 $ 35,060
============= =============
</TABLE>
In connection with the Bank Conversion, the Bank reclassified certain
loans to enable the Bank to better comply with regulatory reporting requirements
and to assist in management's analysis of the loan portfolio. The primary effect
of those efforts was to increase the balance of the Bank's commercial real
estate portfolio at December 31, 1996 as compared to December 31, 1995. No new
commercial real estate loans were originated during the year ended December 31,
1996.
4
<PAGE>
Loan Maturity Schedule
The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 1996
regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in the Bank's portfolio based on
their contractual terms to maturity, including scheduled repayments of
principal. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no
stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. The
table does not include any estimate of prepayments which significantly shorten
the average life of all mortgage loans and may cause the Bank's repayment
experience to differ from that shown below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Due after
Due during the 1 through Due after
year ending 5 years after 5 years after
December 31, December 31, December 31,
1997 1996 1996 Total
------------- --------------- ------------- -----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
One- to four-family residential ... $ 4,947 $ 9,363 $ 18,898 $ 33,208
Multi-family residential .......... 112 204 1,204 1,520
Construction ...................... 1,010 -- -- 1,010
Church ............................ -- 280 1,595 1,875
Commercial ........................ -- 304 2,329 2,633
Consumer .......................... 337 850 697 1,884
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total ........................ $ 6,406 $ 11,001 $ 24,723 $ 42,130
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The next table sets forth at December 31, 1996, the dollar amount of
all loans due one year or more after December 31, 1996 which have predetermined
interest rates and have floating or adjustable interest rates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Predetermined Floating or
Rate Adjustable Rates
---------------- ----------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
One- to four-family residential ................................ $ 19,307 $ 8,954
Multi-family residential ....................................... 1,204 204
Construction ................................................... -- --
Church ......................................................... 1,595 280
Commercial ..................................................... 2,329 304
Consumer ....................................................... 1,547 --
---------------- --------------
Total ..................................................... $ 25,982 $ 9,742
================ ==============
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE>
Scheduled contractual principal repayments of loans do not reflect the
actual life of such assets. The average life of loans is substantially less than
their contractual terms because of prepayments. In addition, due-on-sale clauses
on loans generally give the Bank the right to declare a loan immediately due and
payable in the event, among other things, that the borrower sells the real
property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid. The average life of
mortgage loans tends to increase, when current mortgage loan market rates are
substantially higher than rates on existing mortgage loans and, conversely,
decreases when current mortgage loan market rates are substantially lower than
rates on existing mortgage loans.
Originations, Purchases and Sales of Loans. The Bank generally has
authority to originate and purchase loans secured by real estate located
throughout the United States. Consistent with its emphasis on being a
community-oriented financial institution, the Bank concentrates its lending
activities in its market area.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the
Bank's loan originations for the periods indicated. There were no loans
purchased or sold during the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Loans originated:
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential .................. $ 9,534 $ 8,315
Multi-family residential ......................... 431 231
Construction ..................................... 2,599 2,429
Church ........................................... 835 1,211
Commercial ....................................... -- 279
Consumer loans ...................................... 1,710 1,236
--------------- --------------
Total loans originated .......................... $ 15,109 $ 13,701
=============== ==============
</TABLE>
The Bank's loan originations are derived from a number of sources,
including referrals by realtors, depositors and borrowers, as well as walk-in
customers. The Bank's solicitation programs consist of advertisements in local
media, in addition to occasional participation in various community
organizations and events. Real estate loans are originated by the Bank's loan
officers. All of the Bank's loan officers are salaried, and the Bank does not
compensate loan officers on a commission basis for loans originated. Loan
applications are accepted at each of the Bank's offices.
Loan Underwriting Policies. The Bank's lending activities are subject
to the Bank's written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and to loan
origination procedures prescribed by the Bank's Board of Directors and its
management. Detailed loan applications are obtained to determine the borrower's
ability to repay, and the more significant items on these applications are
verified through the use of credit reports, financial statements and
confirmations. Property valuations are performed by appraisers approved by the
Bank's Board of Directors. All residential real estate loans and all consumer
loans in excess of an individual loan officer's approval authority must be
approved by the Bank's Loan Committee, which consists of the President of the
Bank and two other directors. All multi-family real estate loans and commercial
real estate loans must be approved by the full Board of Directors. Individual
officers of the Bank have been granted authority by the Board of Directors to
approve consumer loans up to varying specified dollar amounts, depending upon
the type of loan.
6
<PAGE>
Currently, applications for fixed-rate, single-family real estate loans
are underwritten and documented in accordance with the standards of the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC") and the Federal National Mortgage
Association ("FNMA"). Prior to October 1994, however, the Bank did not use FHLMC
and FNMA documents to close its loans. It is the Bank's policy to record a lien
on the real estate securing the loan and to obtain title insurance or a lawyer's
opinion of title which insures that the property is free of prior encumbrances.
Borrowers must also obtain hazard insurance policies prior to closing and, when
the property is in a flood plain as designated by the Department of Housing and
Urban Development, paid flood insurance policies. Earthquake insurance is also
required on all real estate loans except land loans. Mine subsidence insurance
is also required when the property securing the loan is located in an area that
has been determined to be undermined. Upon receipt of a loan application from a
prospective borrower, a credit report generally is ordered to verify specific
information relating to the loan applicant's employment, income and credit
standing. If a proposed loan is to be secured by a mortgage on real estate, an
appraisal of the real estate is undertaken by an appraiser approved by the Bank.
Federal regulations require that all appraisals performed in connection
with federally related transactions must be performed by state-certified or
state-licensed appraisers. Federally related transactions are defined to include
real estate-related financial transactions which the OCC regulates, and would
include mortgages made by the Bank. Appraisals by state-certified appraisers
will be required for all such transactions having a value of $1.0 million or
more. The OCC is authorized to determine other circumstances in which appraisals
must be performed by state-certified appraisers. The OCC has adopted regulations
requiring that all real estate-related financial transactions engaged in by
national banks having a transaction value of $250,000 or more, other than those
involving appraisals of one- to four-family residential properties, require an
appraisal performed by a state-certified appraiser. One- to four-family
residential property financing may require an appraisal by a state-certified
appraiser if the amount involved exceeds $1.0 million or the financing involves
a "complex" one- to four-family property appraisal. Exceptions are made for
financings in which the transaction value is $250,000 or less or when the lien
is not necessary security. Illinois currently has a certification program in
effect. It is the policy of the Bank that appraisals be obtained in connection
with all loans for the purchase of real estate or to refinance real estate loans
where the existing mortgage is held by a party other than the Bank.
The Bank is permitted to lend up to 100% of the appraised value of the
real property securing a mortgage loan. The Bank is required by federal
regulations to obtain private mortgage insurance on that portion of the
principal amount of any loan that is 90% or greater of the appraised value of
the property. The Bank will make a single-family residential mortgage loan with
a loan-to-value ratio of up to 95% and to require private mortgage insurance for
loan amounts in excess of 80%. The maximum loan-to-value ratio permitted on land
loans is 50%. The Bank generally limits the loan-to-value ratio on commercial
and multi-family real estate mortgage loans to 70%.
Under applicable law, with certain limited exceptions, loans and
extensions of credit by a national bank to a person outstanding at one time
shall not exceed 15% of the institution's unimpaired capital and surplus. Loans
and extensions of credit fully secured by readily marketable collateral may
comprise an additional 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus. The Bank's loans
to one borrower were limited to $1.4 million at December 31, 1996. At December
31, 1996, the Bank had no lending relationships in excess of the
loans-to-one-borrower limit. At December 31, 1996, the Bank's largest loan was a
$548,000 loan to a local church and the Bank's next five largest loans ranged
from $250,000 to $518,000. All six loans were current and continued to perform
in accordance with their terms at December 31, 1996.
Interest rates charged by the Bank on loans are affected principally by
competitive factors, the demand for such loans and the supply of funds available
for lending purposes. These factors are, in turn, affected by general economic
conditions, monetary policies of the federal government, including the Federal
Reserve Board, legislative tax policies and government budgetary matters.
7
<PAGE>
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending. The Bank
historically has been and continues to be an originator of one- to four-family,
residential real estate loans in its primary market area. At December 31, 1996,
one- to four-family, residential mortgage loans, totaled $33.2 million, or
78.9%, of the Bank's total loan portfolio.
The Bank originates both fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgage loans.
The Bank offers fixed rate mortgage loans with terms of up to 20 years. The Bank
originates one and three-year adjustable rate loans with terms of up to 30
years. Since October 1994, the adjustable rate loans originated by the Bank are
indexed to the one or three-year Treasury Bill rate, adjusted for constant
maturity. Approximately $10.6 million of the Bank's adjustable rate loans at
December 31, 1996 were tied to this index. Rate adjustments on one-year
adjustable rate loans are limited to a maximum of two percentage points per
adjustment and six percentage points over the life of the loan. Rate adjustments
on three-year adjustable rate loans are limited to a maximum of three percentage
points per adjustment and six percentage points over the life of the loan.
Adjustable rate loans originated prior to October 1994 were indexed to
the FHLB Average Interest Rate Paid on Previously Occupied Homes. Changes in
this index generally lag changes in other indices. Interest rates on such loans
are not adjusted based upon an increment over such rate but adjust based upon
the changes in such rate, subject to floors and ceilings on the rate. As of
December 31, 1996, approximately $5.0 million of the Bank's adjustable rate
loans had been originated in accordance with these terms.
The retention of adjustable-rate mortgage loans in the Bank's loan
portfolio helps reduce the Bank's exposure to changes in interest rates.
However, there are unquantifiable credit risks resulting from potential
increased costs to the borrower as a result of repricing of adjustable-rate
mortgage loans. It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates, the
risk of default on adjustable-rate and short-term or callable fixed-rate
mortgage loans may increase due to the upward adjustment of interest cost to the
borrower. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that yields on the Bank's
adjustable-rate mortgages will adjust sufficiently to compensate for increases
in the Bank's cost of funds.
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Lending. The Bank's
multi-family residential loan portfolio consists primarily of loans secured by
small apartment buildings. The Bank's commercial real estate loan portfolio
consists primarily of loans to finance the acquisition of small retail
establishments and distribution centers. Such loans generally range in size from
$70,000 to $300,000. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had $1.5 million of
multi-family residential loans and $2.6 million of commercial real estate loans,
which amounted to 3.6% and 6.3%, respectively, of the Bank's total loan
portfolio at such date. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans are
generally underwritten with loan-to-value ratios of up to 70% of the lesser of
the appraised value or the purchase price of the property. Such loans generally
are made either on a fixed rate or adjustable rate basis at a rate approximately
0.5% higher than the rate charged on one-to four-family residential loans.
Generally, such loans are made for ten year terms and may provide for a balloon
payment at the end of such term. Because of the inherently greater risk involved
in this type of lending, the Bank generally limits its multi-family and
commercial real estate lending to borrowers within its market area with which it
has had prior experience.
Multi-family residential and commercial real estate lending entails
significant additional risks as compared with single-family residential property
lending. Multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans typically
involve large loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers.
The payment experience on such loans typically is dependent on the successful
operation of the real estate project. These risks can be significantly impacted
by supply and demand conditions in the market for office and retail and
residential space, and, as such, may be subject to a greater extent to adverse
conditions in the economy generally. To minimize these risks, the Bank generally
limits itself to its market area or to borrowers with which it has prior
experience or who are otherwise well known to the Bank. It has been the Bank's
policy to obtain annual financial statements of the project for which commercial
and multi-family residential real estate loans are made. In addition, in the
case of commercial mortgage loans made to a partnership or a corporation, the
Bank seeks, whenever possible, to obtain personal guarantees and annual
financial statements of the principals of the partnership or corporation.
8
<PAGE>
Church Lending. The Bank's loan portfolio includes a number of real
estate loans made to finance the construction or acquisition of church
properties located in the Bank's market area. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had
seven church loans aggregating approximately $1.9 million, the largest of which
had a balance outstanding of $548,000. Such loans are generally originated on a
fixed rate basis at a rate approximately 0.5% higher than the fixed rate charged
on one- to four-family residential real estate loans. The maximum term on church
loans is generally 15 years.
Construction Lending. On a limited basis, the Bank also offers
construction loans to qualified borrowers for construction of single-family
residences in the Bank's market area. Typically, the Bank limits its
construction lending to individuals who are building their primary residences or
to a limited number of local builders with whom the Bank has substantial
experience for the construction of a maximum of two one- to four-family
residential properties. These loans generally provide for a six-month
construction period with only interest being paid during such time and convert
to a permanent loan at the end of the construction period. Construction loans
are underwritten in accordance with the same standards as the Bank's mortgages
on existing properties. Construction loans generally have a maximum
loan-to-value ratio of 80% of the appraised value of the property on an "as
completed basis." Borrowers must satisfy all credit requirements which would
apply to the Bank's permanent mortgage loan financing for the subject property.
Construction financing generally is considered to involve a higher
degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real
estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the
accuracy of the initial estimate of the property's value at completion of
construction or development and the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in
delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be
inaccurate, the Bank may be required to advance funds beyond the amount
originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of
value proves to be inaccurate, the Bank may be confronted, at or prior to the
maturity of the loan, with a project having a value which is insufficient to
assure full repayment. The ability of a developer to sell developed lots or
completed dwelling units will depend on, among other things, demand, pricing,
availability of comparable properties and economic conditions. The Bank has
sought to minimize this risk by limiting construction lending to qualified
borrowers in the Bank's market area and by limiting the aggregate amount of
outstanding construction loans. At December 31, 1996, construction loans
amounted to $1.0 million, or 2.4%, of the Bank's loan portfolio.
Consumer Lending. The consumer loans originated by the Bank include
loans secured by savings deposits, home improvement loans, automobile loans,
home equity loans and unsecured loans. At December 31, 1996, consumer loans
totaled $1.9 million, or 4.5%, of the Bank's total loan portfolio.
Automobile loans are secured by both new and used cars and, depending
on the creditworthiness of the borrower, may be made for up to 90% of the
dealer's invoice plus destination and local charges, or, with respect to used
automobiles, the loan value as published by the National Automobile Dealers
Association. New cars are financed for a period of up to five years, while used
cars are financed for up to four years depending on the age of the vehicle.
Collision insurance is required for all automobile loans. At December 31, 1996,
automobile loans totaled $346,000.
Home improvement loans generally are made on the security of residences
on which the Bank holds the first mortgage. The maximum size of home improvement
loans is 80% of the "as completed" appraised value of the residence, less the
outstanding principal of the first mortgage, and have terms of up to 10 years.
The Bank also participates in the Federal Housing Authority ("FHA") Title I Home
Improvement loan program. Such loans must be to finance only certain types of
improvements up to a maximum loan size of $7,500. The FHA guarantees 90% of the
principal amount of each such loan. Home improvement loans generally are made on
a fixed-rate basis. At December 31, 1996, home improvement loans amounted to
$490,000.
9
<PAGE>
The Bank makes deposit account loans for up to 90% of the depositor's
deposit account balance. The interest rate is normally 2% above the rate paid on
the deposit account, and the account must be pledged as collateral to secure the
loan. Interest generally is billed on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 1996,
loans on deposit accounts totaled $503,000, or 1.2%, of the Bank's total loan
portfolio.
Consumer lending affords the Bank the opportunity to earn yields higher
than those obtainable on single-family residential lending or agricultural
lending. However, consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential
mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans which are unsecured or secured
by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. Repossessed collateral for a
defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the
outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss
or depreciation. The remaining deficiency often does not warrant further
substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer and
credit card loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing
financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by events
such as job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.
Loan Fees and Servicing. In addition to interest earned on loans, the
Bank receives fees in connection with late payments and for miscellaneous
services related to its loans. Due to competition from other lenders in its
Market Area, the Bank does not charge fees in connection with loan originations,
modifications or extensions. The Bank generally does not service loans for
others and has earned minimal income from this activity.
Nonperforming Loans and Other Problem Assets. It is management's policy
to continually monitor its loan portfolio to anticipate and address potential
and actual delinquencies. When a borrower fails to make a payment on a loan, the
Bank takes immediate steps to have the delinquency cured and the loan restored
to current status. All loans originated since October 1994 provide that a late
fee of 5% of principal and interest due will be due after a payment is 15 days
delinquent. Loans originated prior to October 1994 provided that no late fee
would be assessed until a payment was 40 days or more delinquent, at which time
a late fee was assessed equal to 5% of principal and interest. As a matter of
policy, the Bank will contact the borrower after a payment is 45 days
delinquent. Computer generated notices are sent out prior to this time. If
payment is not promptly received, the borrower is contacted again, and efforts
are made to formulate an affirmative plan to cure the delinquency. Generally,
after any loan is delinquent 90 days or more, formal legal proceedings are
commenced to collect amounts owed.
Loans generally are placed on nonaccrual status if the loan becomes
past due more than 90 days, except in instances where in management's judgment
there is no doubt as to full collectibility of principal and interest, or
management concludes that payment in full is not likely. Consumer loans are
generally charged off, or any expected loss is reserved for, after they become
more than 120 days past due. All other loans are charged off when management
concludes that they are uncollectible. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Real estate acquired by the Bank as a result of foreclosure is
classified as real estate acquired through foreclosure until such time as it is
sold. When such property is acquired, it is recorded at the lower of cost or its
fair value less estimated selling costs. Any required write-down of the loan to
its fair value less estimated selling costs upon foreclosure is charged against
the allowance for loan losses. See Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
10
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Bank's
nonperforming assets at the dates indicated. There were no loans accruing which
are contractually past due 90 days or more or restructured loans within the
meaning of SFAS No. 15.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995
------ ------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis: (1)
Real estate:
One- to four-family residential ................. $ 383 $ 481
Multi-family residential ........................ 88 --
Church .......................................... -- --
Commercial ...................................... -- --
Commercial ......................................... -- --
Consumer ........................................... 22 89
----------- ----------
Total ........................................... $ 493 $ 570
=========== ==========
Accruing loans which are contractually
past due 90 days or more:
Real estate:
Residential ..................................... $ -- $ --
Commercial ...................................... -- --
Consumer ........................................... -- --
----------- ----------
Total ........................................... $ -- $ --
=========== ==========
Total nonperforming loans ....................... $ 493 $ 570
=========== ==========
Percentage of total loans ............................. 1.19% 1.63%
=========== ==========
Other nonperforming assets (2) ........................ $ 133 $ --
=========== ==========
</TABLE>
- -------------
(1) Non-accrual status denotes loans on which, in the opinion of
management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely. Payments
received on a nonaccrual loan are either applied to the outstanding
principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on
management's assessment of the collectibility of the loan.
(2) Other nonperforming assets represents property acquired by the Bank
through foreclosure. This property is carried at the lower of its fair
market value or the principal balance of the related loan, whichever is
lower.
At December 31, 1996, nonaccrual loans amounted to $493,000 as compared
to $570,000 at December 31, 1995. The residential nonaccrual loans consisted of
ten single family home loans with outstanding balances at December 31, 1996,
ranging from $3,000 to $64,000. Consumer nonaccrual loans at December 31, 1996
were $22,000 as compared to $89,000 at December 31, 1995. The decrease in total
nonaccrual loans was due to increased collection efforts. The nonaccrual
multi-family residential balance consists of one building in Murphysboro,
Illinois.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, gross interest income of
$16,000 would have been recorded on loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis if
the loans had been current throughout the respective periods. There were no
restructured loans during the periods.
There were no loans which are not currently classified as non-accrual,
90 days past due or restructured but where known information about possible
credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious concerns as to
the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and may
result in disclosure as non-accrual, 90 days past due or restructured.
11
<PAGE>
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at the
lower of cost (net loan receivable balance at date of foreclosure) or fair value
less estimated selling costs. Fair value is defined as the amount in cash or
cash-equivalent value of other consideration that a real estate parcel would
yield in a current sale between a willing buyer and a willing seller, as
measured by market transactions. If a market does not exist, fair value of the
item is estimated based on selling prices of similar items in active markets or,
if there are no active markets for similar items, by discounting a forecast of
expected cash flows at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Fair value is
generally determined through an appraisal at the time of foreclosure. The Bank
records a valuation allowance for estimated selling costs of the property
immediately after foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, real estate acquired
through foreclosure is periodically evaluated by management and an allowance for
loss is established if the estimated fair value of the property, less estimated
costs to sell, declines. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had $133,000 in real
estate owned, consisting of two single-family residences and three building
lots.
Federal regulations require national banks to classify their assets on
the basis of quality on a regular basis. An asset is classified as substandard
if it is determined to be inadequately protected by the current retained
earnings and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if
any. An asset is classified as doubtful if full collection is highly
questionable or improbable. An asset is classified as loss if it is considered
uncollectible, even if a partial recovery could be expected in the future. The
regulations also provide for a special mention designation, described as assets
which do not currently expose a national bank to a sufficient degree of risk to
warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential
weaknesses deserving management's close attention. Assets classified as
substandard or doubtful require a national bank to establish general allowances
for loan losses. If an asset or portion thereof is classified loss, a national
bank must either establish a specific allowance for loss in the amount of the
portion of the asset classified loss, or charge off such amount. Federal
examiners may disagree with a bank's classifications. If a bank does not agree
with an examiner's classification of an asset, it may appeal this determination
to the District Manager of the OCC. The Bank regularly reviews its assets to
determine whether any assets require classification or re-classification. At
December 31, 1996, the Bank had $631,000 in classified assets, which consisted
of $626,000 in assets classified as substandard, no assets classified as
doubtful and $5,000 in assets classified as loss.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In originating loans, the Bank recognizes
that credit losses will be experienced and that the risk of loss will vary with,
among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the
borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case
of a secured loan, the quality of the security for the loan. It is management's
policy to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses based on, among other
things, the Bank's and the industry's historical loan loss experience,
evaluation of economic conditions, regular reviews of delinquencies and loan
portfolio quality and evolving standards imposed by federal bank examiners. The
Bank increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for loan
losses against the Bank's income. During the year ended December 31, 1996, the
Bank made a $5,000 provision to the allowance for loan losses on the basis of
management's assessment of the level of risk in the loan portfolio. Among other
factors, management believed that this increase was warranted because of charges
made against the reserve during 1996 as well as the additional risks posed by
the increase in the Bank's church, commercial real estate and consumer loan
portfolios.
Management will continue to actively monitor the Bank's asset quality
and allowance for loan losses. Management will charge off loans and properties
acquired in settlement of loans against the allowances for losses on such loans
and such properties when appropriate and will provide specific loss allowances
when necessary. Although management believes it uses the best information
available to make determinations with respect to the allowances for losses and
believes such allowances are adequate, future adjustments may be necessary if
economic conditions differ substantially from the economic conditions in the
assumptions used in making the initial determinations.
The Bank's methodology for establishing the allowance for loan losses
takes into consideration probable losses that have been identified in connection
with specific assets as well as losses that have not been identified but
12
<PAGE>
can be expected to occur. Management conducts regular reviews of the Bank's
assets and evaluates the need to establish allowances on the basis of this
review. Assets reviewed include nonaccrual loans, accruing loans 90 days or more
delinquent, loans modified in troubled debt restructurings and real estate
owned, as well as any additional classified loans or loans not falling within
any of the above categories but where known information about possible credit
problems of borrowers causes management to have serious concerns as to the
ability of the borrowers to comply with loan repayment terms and may result in
disclosure of the loans as nonaccrual, 90 days past due or restructured.
Allowances are established by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis based
on an assessment of risk in the Bank's assets taking into consideration the
composition and quality of the portfolio, delinquency trends, current charge-off
and loss experience, loan concentrations, the state of the real estate market,
regulatory reviews conducted in the regulatory examination process and economic
conditions generally. Additional provisions for losses on loans are made in
order to bring the allowance to a level deemed adequate. Specific reserves will
be provided for individual assets, or portions of assets, when ultimate
collection is considered improbable by management based on the current payment
status of the assets and the fair value of the security. At the date of
foreclosure or other repossession or at the date the Bank determines a property
is an "in-substance foreclosed" property, the Bank would transfer the property
to real estate acquired in settlement of loans at the lower of cost or fair
value less estimated selling costs. Any portion of the outstanding loan balance
in excess of fair value less estimated selling costs would be charged off
against the allowance for loan losses. If, upon ultimate disposition of the
property, net sales proceeds exceed the net carrying value of the property, a
gain on sale of real estate would be recorded.
OCC policy requires maintenance of an adequate allowance for loan and
lease losses and an effective loan review system. This policy includes an
arithmetic formula for checking the reasonableness of an institution's allowance
for loan loss estimate compared to the average loss experience of the industry
as a whole. Examiners will review an institution's allowance for loan losses and
compare it against the sum of: (i) up to 60% of the portfolio that is classified
doubtful; (ii) up to 25% of the portfolio that is classified as substandard; and
(iii) for the portions of the portfolio that have not been classified (including
those loans designated as special mention), estimated credit losses over the
upcoming 12 months given the facts and circumstances as of the evaluation date.
This amount is considered neither a "floor" nor a "safe harbor" of the level of
allowance for loan losses an institution should maintain, but examiners will
view a shortfall relative to the amount as an indication that they should review
management's policy on allocating these allowances to determine whether it is
reasonable based on all relevant factors.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the Bank's allowance for
loan losses for the periods indicated. There were $5,000 of loans charged off
during 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------
1996 1995
---------- -----------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period ......................... $ 300 $ 100
Charge-offs ............................................ (5) --
Provision for loan losses .............................. 5 200
---------- -----------
Balance at end of period ............................... $ 300 $ 300
========== ===========
Ratio of net charge-offs to average
loans outstanding during the period ................. .01% 0%
========== ===========
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
The following table allocates the allowance for loan losses by loan
category at the dates indicated. The allocation of the allowance to each
category is not necessarily indicative of future losses and does not restrict
the use of the allowance to absorb losses in any category.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
---------------------------- -------------------------
Percent of Percent of
Loans in Loans in
Category to Category to
Amount Total Loans Amount Total Loans
------ ----------- ------ -----------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate - mortgage:
One- to four-family residential $ 237 78.82% $ 247 82.21%
Multi-family residential 11 3.61 10 3.46
Construction 7 2.40 12 3.86
Church 13 4.45 14 4.68
Commercial 19 6.25 6 2.11
Consumer 13 4.47 11 3.68
--------- ------- ------- -------
Total allowance for loan losses $ 300 100.00% $ 300 100.00%
========= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Investment Activities
The Bank is permitted under federal law to make certain investments,
including investments in securities issued by various federal agencies and state
and municipal governments, deposits at the FHLB of Chicago, mortgage-backed and
related securities, certificates of deposits in federally insured institutions,
certain bankers' acceptances and federal funds. It may also invest, subject to
certain limitations, in commercial paper having one of the two highest
investment ratings of a nationally recognized credit rating agency, and certain
other types of corporate debt securities and mutual funds. Federal regulations
require the Bank to maintain an investment in FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank
stock and a minimum amount of liquid assets which may be invested in cash and
specified securities.
The investment policy of the Company and the Bank currently allows for
investment in various types of mortgage-backed and related securities, liquid
assets, including United States Government and Agency securities, time deposits
at the FHLB of Chicago, certificates of deposit or bankers' acceptances at other
federally insured depository institutions subject to certain limitations, and
obligations of states and political subdivisions. Generally, the objectives of
the Bank's investment policy are to: (i) maximize returns; (ii) provide and
maintain liquidity within the guidelines of OCC regulations; (iii) maintain a
balance of high-quality, diversified investments to minimize risk; (iv) provide
collateral for pledging requirements; (v) serve as a counter-cyclical balance to
the loan portfolio; (vi) manage interest rate risk; and (vii) to insure
compliance with all regulatory requirements. In accordance with the investment
policy, at December 31, 1996, the Company and the Bank had investments in U.S.
Government and agency notes, obligations of state and political subdivisions,
interest-earning deposits and certificates of deposit and FHLB of Chicago stock
and Federal Reserve Board stock.
In connection with its adoption of SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" on January 1, 1994, the Bank
classified all investment securities and mortgage-backed securities as held to
maturity. Subsequent to January 1, 1994, the Bank's purchased $4.1 million of
mortgage-backed securities which were classified as available for sale. During
December 1995, the Bank transferred mortgage-backed securities previously
classified as held to maturity into the available for sale category. The
amortized cost of these securities was $4.0 million. During 1996, these
securities were sold for gross proceeds of $4.0 million. In addition, during
1995, a $100,000 U.S. Treasury note held by the Bank's subsidiary was
transferred from held to maturity to available for sale. As of December 31,
1996, investment securities available for sale had an amortized cost of $2.1
million and an aggregate market value of $2.1 million, while mortgage-backed
securities available for sale had an amortized cost of $2.9 million and an
aggregate market value of $2.8 million. The aggregate impact on retained
earnings of the implementation of SFAS No. 115 was an after-tax decrease of
$15,000 as of December 31, 1996.
14
<PAGE>
Mortgage-Backed and Related Securities. Mortgage-backed securities
represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi-family
mortgages, the principal and interest payments on which are passed from the
mortgage originators through intermediaries that pool and repackage the
participation interest in the form of securities to investors such as the Bank.
Such intermediaries may include quasi-governmental agencies such as FHLMC, FNMA
and GNMA which guarantee the payment of principal and interest to investors.
Mortgage-backed securities generally increase the quality of the Bank's assets
by virtue of the guarantees that back them, are more liquid than individual
mortgage loans and may be used to collaterize borrowings or other obligations of
the Bank.
Mortgage-backed securities typically are issued with stated principal
amounts and the securities are backed by pools of mortgages that have loans with
interest rates that are within a range and have similar maturities. The
underlying pool of mortgages can be composed of either fixed-rate or
adjustable-rate mortgage loans. Mortgage-backed securities generally are
referred to as mortgage participation certificates or pass-through certificates.
As a result, the interest rate risk characteristics of the underlying pool of
mortgages, i.e., fixed-rate or adjustable-rate, as well as prepayment risk, are
passed on to the certificate holder. The life of a mortgage-backed pass-through
security is equal to the life of the underlying mortgages.
The actual maturity of a mortgage-backed security varies, depending on
when the mortgagors prepay or repay the underlying mortgages. Prepayments of the
underlying mortgages may shorten the life of the investment, thereby adversely
affecting its yield to maturity and the related market value of the
mortgage-backed security. The yield is based upon the interest income and the
amortization of the premium or accretion of the discount related to the
mortgage-backed security. Premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities
are amortized or accredited over the estimated term of the securities using a
level yield method. The prepayment assumptions used to determine the
amortization period for premiums and discounts can significantly affect the
yield of the mortgage-backed security, and these assumptions are reviewed
periodically to reflect the actual prepayment. The actual prepayments of the
underlying mortgages depend on many factors, including the type of mortgage, the
coupon rate, the age of the mortgages, the geographical location of the
underlying real estate collateralizing the mortgages and general levels of
market interest rates. The difference between the interest rates on the
underlying mortgages and the prevailing mortgage interest rates is an important
determinant in the rate of prepayments. During periods of falling mortgage
interest rates, prepayments generally increase, and, conversely, during periods
of rising mortgage interest rates, prepayments generally decrease. If the coupon
rate of the underlying mortgage significantly exceeds the prevailing market
interest rates offered for mortgage loans, refinancing generally increases and
accelerates the prepayment of the underlying mortgages. Prepayment experience is
more difficult to estimate for adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities.
Mortgage-related securities are typically issued by a special purpose
entity, which may be organized in a variety of legal forms, such as a trust, a
corporation or a partnership. The entity aggregates pools of pass-through
securities, which are used to collateralize the mortgage-related securities.
Once combined, the cash flows can be divided into "tranches" or "classes" of
individual securities, thereby creating more predictable average lives for each
security than the underlying pass-through pools. Accordingly, under this
security structure, all principal paydowns from the various mortgage pools are
allocated to a mortgage-related securities' class or classes structured to have
priority until it has been paid off. These securities generally have fixed
interest rates, and, as a result, changes in interest rates generally would
affect the market value and possibly the prepayment rates of such securities.
Some mortgage-related securities instruments are like traditional debt
instruments due to their stated principal amounts and traditionally defined
interest rate terms. Purchasers of certain other mortgage-related securities
instruments are entitled to the excess, if any, of the issuer's cash flows.
These mortgage-related securities instruments may include instruments designated
as residual interest and are riskier in that they could result in the loss of a
portion of the original investment. Cash flows from residual interests are very
sensitive to prepayments and, thus, contain a high degree of interest rate risk.
The Bank's mortgage-backed and related securities portfolio consists
primarily of seasoned fixed-rate and adjustable rate mortgage-backed and related
securities. The Bank makes such investments in order to manage cash
15
<PAGE>
flow, diversify assets and obtain yield.
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1994, the Bank's previous chief executive officer purchased $4.0
million of collateralized mortgage obligations. Such investments provided no
cash flow from principal redemption to the Bank and did not mature during the
period from December 1994 to August 1995. As a result, the Bank experienced
short-term liquidity and cash flow problems through mid-1995. Additionally,
these investments have resulted in reduced interest income for the Bank, when
compared to the yield which likely would have been earned from investing such
funds in residential mortgage loans, thereby negatively affecting the Bank's net
interest income and net income. In the first quarter of fiscal 1996, these
investments were sold for total proceeds of $4.0 million resulting in a gross
realized gain of $11,000. No new CMOs were purchased during 1996.
The following table sets forth the carrying value of the Company's
investments on a consolidated basis at the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31,
---------------------------------
1996 1995
-------------- -------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Securities available for sale (1):
U.S. Government and agency and
municipal securities................................ $ 2,108 $ 102
Collateral mortgage obligations....................... -- 4,054
Mortgage-backed securities............................ 2,814 3,281
Securities held to maturity:
U.S. government and agency and
municipal securities................................ 9,030 9,120
Mortgage-backed securities............................ 6,663 3,128
----------- -----------
Total investment securities........................ 20,615 19,685
Cash and cash equivalents................................ 658 2,581
Certificates of deposit.................................. 293 981
FHLB and FRB stock....................................... 489 342
----------- -----------
Total investments.................................. $ 22,055 $ 23,589
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
- --------------
(1) The carrying value of securities available for sale is the market value.
16
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth information in the scheduled maturities,
amortized cost, market values and average yields for the Company's investment
and mortgage-backed securities portfolio at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
One Year or Less One to Five Years Five to Ten Years More than Ten Year
------------------ ------------------- --------------------- -------------------
Carrying Average Carrying Average Carrying Average Carrying Average
Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield Value Yield
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government, agency and
municipal securities ....... $ 100 6.88% $ 1,756 6.38% $ 252 7.35% $ -- -- %
Mortgage-backed securities ... -- -- 1,620 6.88 -- -- 1,194 6.26
Securities held to maturity:
U.S. government and agency
and municipal securities .. 2,410 4.64 6,300 5.63 260 5.16 60 5.60
Mortgage-backed securities ... -- -- 2,444 5.75 1,459 6.40 2,760 6.51
--------- -------- -------- --------
Total ..................... $ 2,510 4.73% $ 12,120 5.93% $ 1,971 6.36% $ 4,014 6.42%
========= ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Total Investment Portfolio
-----------------------------
Carrying Market Average
Value Value Yield
-------- ----- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government, agency and
municipal securities ....... $ 2,108 $ 2,108 6.52%
Mortgage-backed securities ... 2,814 2,814 6.62
Securities held to maturity:
U.S. government and agency
and municipal securities .. 9,030 9,038 5.35
Mortgage-backed securities ... 6,663 6,528 6.21
-------- -------
Total ..................... $20,615 $20,488 5.92%
======== =======
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
Deposit Activity and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits are the primary source of the Bank's funds for
lending, investment activities and general operational purposes. In addition to
deposits, the Bank derives funds from loan principal and interest repayments,
maturities of investment securities and mortgage-backed and related securities
and interest payments thereon. Although loan repayments are a relatively stable
source of funds, deposit inflows and outflows are significantly influenced by
general interest rates and money market conditions. Borrowings may be used on a
short-term basis to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds, or
on a longer term basis for general operational purposes.
Deposits. The Bank attracts deposits principally from within its market
area by offering a variety of deposit instruments, including checking accounts,
money market accounts, regular savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts,
and certificates of deposit which range in maturity from 90 days to four years.
Deposit terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the length of time
the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate. Maturities, terms,
service fees and withdrawal penalties for its deposit accounts are established
by the Bank on a periodic basis. The Bank reviews its deposit mix and pricing on
a weekly basis. In determining the characteristics of its deposit accounts, the
Bank considers the rates offered by competing institutions, funds acquisition
and liquidity requirements, growth goals and federal regulations. Management
believes it prices its deposits comparably to rates offered by its competitors.
The Bank does not accept brokered deposits.
The Bank competes for deposits with other institutions in its market
areas by offering deposit instruments that are competitively priced and by
providing customer service through convenient and attractive offices,
knowledgeable and efficient staff and hours of service that meet customers'
needs. Substantially all of the Bank's depositors are Illinois residents.
18
<PAGE>
Savings deposits in the Company on a consolidated basis at December 31,
1996 were represented by the various types of savings programs described below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Interest Minimum Minimum Balances Percentage of
Rate Term Category Amount in Thousands Total Savings
-------- ------- -------- ------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
N/A None Non-interest bearing accounts N/A $ 248 .47%
3.84% None Passbook accounts $ 10.00 6,649 12.58
3.04 None NOW accounts 50.00 8,912 16.87
4.08 12 Month Christmas Club 5.00 10 .02
<CAPTION>
Certificates of Deposit
-----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
4.60-4.73 91 days Fixed-term, fixed-rate 2,500 549 1.04
4.98-5.19 6 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 2,500 4,361 8.25
5.28-5.48 12 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 7,204 13.63
6.17-6.32 18 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 3,856 7.30
5.80-5.85 30 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 6,000 11.36
5.62-5.96 36 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 1,194 2.26
6.11-6.45 48 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 1,092 2.07
6.09-6.16 60 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 2,969 5.62
6.17-6.37 72 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 1,174 2.22
6.52-6.83 96 month Fixed-term, fixed-rate 500 1,326 2.51
6.09-6.73 IRAs Fixed-term, fixed-rate 100 4,431 8.39
6.93 700 days Fixed-term, fixed-rate 1,000 811 1.54
7.08 Variable Fixed-term, fixed rate 100,000 323 .61
7.04 36 month (1) Fixed-term, adjustable-rate 5,000 1,723 3.26
----------- -------
$ 52,832 100.00%
=========== =======
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) Customer has option at any time during term of certificate to request a
one-time increase to the then-prevailing 36 month certificate of
deposit rate.
The following table sets forth the change in dollar amount of deposits
in the various types of accounts offered by the Company between the dates
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Increase
Balance at (Decrease) from Balance at
December 31, % of December 31, December 31, % of
1996 Deposits 1995 1995 Deposits
-------------- -------- ----------------- ---------------- --------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Non-interest bearing accounts ...... $ 248 .47% $ 248 $ -- -- %
Passbook and regular
savings .......................... 6,649 12.58 231 6,418 11.54
NOW ................................ 8,912 16.87 (257) 9,169 16.48
Christmas club ..................... 10 0.02 (1) 11 0.02
Certificates of deposit ............ 32,582 61.67 (2,812) 35,394 63.62
IRA ................................ 4,431 8.39 (209) 4,640 8.34
------------ ------ ------------ ----------- -------
Total ......................... $ 52,832 100.00% $ (2,800) $ 55,632 100.00%
============ ====== ============ =========== =======
</TABLE>
19
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the average month-end balances and
interest rates for interest-bearing demand deposits and time deposits for the
periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
--------------------------- ----------------------------
Average Average Average Average
Balance Rate Balance Rate
------- ------- ------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Savings deposits ........................ $ 7,173 3.94% $ 6,652 3.85%
Interest-bearing demand deposits......... 9,367 3.04 8,818 3.05
Certificates of deposit ................. 38,673 5.78 38,288 5.83
--------- ---------
Total .............................. $ 55,213 $ 53,758
========= =========
</TABLE>
The following table indicates the amount of the Bank's certificates of
deposit of $100,000 or more by time remaining until maturity as of December 31,
1996 and at such date represented 8.51% of total deposits and had a weighted
average rate of 5.96%. The Bank's certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000
primarily consist of deposits from individual retail customers. To the extent
the Bank is unable to replace maturing deposits, it may sell investment
securities classified as available for sale.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Certificates
Maturity Period of Deposits
--------------- ------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C>
Three months or less......................... $ 944
Over three months through six months......... 762
Over six months through 12 months............ 820
Over 12 months............................... 1,970
--------
Total.................................... $ 4,496
========
</TABLE>
Borrowings. Savings deposits historically have been the primary source
of funds for the Bank's lending, investments and general operating activities.
The Bank is authorized, however, to use advances from the FHLB of Chicago to
supplement its supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal
requirements. The FHLB of Chicago functions as a central reserve bank providing
credit for savings institutions and certain other member financial institutions.
As a member of the FHLB System, the Bank is required to own stock in the FHLB of
Chicago and is authorized to apply for advances. Advances are pursuant to
several different programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of
maturities. The Bank has a Blanket Agreement for advances with the FHLB under
which the Bank may borrow up to 25% of assets subject to normal collateral and
underwriting requirements. Advances from the FHLB of Chicago would be secured by
the Bank's stock in the FHLB of Chicago and other eligible assets. At December
31, 1996, the Bank had no FHLB advances outstanding. In January 1997, the Bank
borrowed $1,500,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago at interest rates
ranging from 5.69% to 5.77%. All of these borrowings are due and payable within
six months of the borrowing date.
20
<PAGE>
Subsidiary Activities
The Bank has one subsidiary service corporation, Herrin First Service
Corporation. Herrin First Service Corporation was formed in 1971 by the Bank for
the purpose of developing a residential subdivision located in Herrin. Such
development was completed and all lots were subsequently sold. No further
development activities have been undertaken or are planned, and the subsidiary
is inactive, although it recently purchased one residential real estate property
for $118,000, with the approval of the OTS. This property was sold in May, 1996
for gross proceeds of $112,000. Its assets consist of various liquid assets and
real estate totaling $222,000.
Performance Ratios
The table below sets forth certain performance ratios of the Company at
or for the years indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At or for the
Year Ended
December 31,
-----------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Performance Ratios:
Return on assets (net income divided by
average total assets) ...................................... .81% (0.50)%
Return on average stockholders' equity (net income
divided by average stockholders' equity) ................... 5.69 (5.87)
Interest rate spread (combined weighted average
interest rate earned less combined weighted
average interest rate cost) ................................ 2.16 2.11
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities ....................... 113.33 106.47
Ratio of noninterest expense to average total assets .......... 2.81 2.03
</TABLE>
Competition
The Bank faces strong competition both in originating real estate,
agriculture, automobile, consumer and other loans and in attracting deposits.
The Bank competes for real estate and other loans principally on the basis of
interest rates, the types of loans it originates and the quality of services it
provides to borrowers. Its competition in originating real estate loans comes
primarily from other savings institutions, commercial banks and mortgage bankers
making loans secured by real estate located in the Bank's market area.
Commercial banks, credit unions and finance companies provide vigorous
competition in consumer lending. Competition may increase as a result of the
continuing reduction of restrictions on the interstate operations of financial
institutions.
Employees
As of December 31, 1996, the Bank had 19 full-time employees and one
part-time employee, none of whom was represented by a collective bargaining
agreement, and management considers the Bank's relationships with its employees
to be good.
21
<PAGE>
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
Regulation of the Company
General. The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of
the BHCA. As such, the Company is registered with the Federal Reserve Board and
subject to Federal Reserve Board regulation, examination, supervision and
reporting requirements. As a bank holding company, the Company is required to
furnish to the Federal Reserve Board annual and quarterly reports of its
operations at the end of each period and to furnish such additional information
as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the BHCA. The Company is
also subject to regular examination by the Federal Reserve Board.
Under the BHCA, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval
of the Federal Reserve Board before (i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership
or control of any voting shares of any bank or bank holding company if, after
such acquisition, the bank holding company would directly or indirectly own or
control more than 5% of such shares; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of
the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (3) merging or
consolidating with another bank holding company.
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Effective September 29, 1995, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act of 1994 (the "Riegle-Neal Act") allows the Federal Reserve Board
to approve an application of an adequately capitalized and adequately managed
bank holding company to acquire control of, or acquire all or substantially all
of the assets of, a bank located in a state other than such holding company's
home state, without regard to whether the transaction is prohibited by the laws
of any state. The Federal Reserve Board may not approve the acquisition of bank
that has not been in existence for the minimum time period (not exceeding five
years) specified by the statutory law of the host state. The Riegle-Neal Act
also prohibits the Federal Reserve Board from approving an application if the
applicant (and its depository institution affiliates) controls or would control
more than 10% of the insured deposits in the United States or 30% or more of the
deposits in the target bank's home state or in any state in which the target
bank maintains a branch. The Riegle-Neal Act does not affect the authority of
states to limit the percentage of total insured deposits in the state which may
be held or controlled by a bank or bank holding company to the extent such
limitation does not discriminate against out-of-state banks or bank holding
companies. Individual states may also waive the 30% state-wide concentration
limit contained in the Riegle-Neal Act.
Additionally, beginning on June 1, 1997, the federal banking agencies
will be authorized to approve interstate merger transactions without regard to
whether such transaction is prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home
state of one of the banks opts out of the Riegle-Neal Act by adopting a law
after the date of enactment of the Riegle-Neal Act and prior to June 1, 1997
which applies equally to all out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger
transactions involving out-of-state banks. Interstate acquisitions of branches
will be permitted only if the law of the state in which the branch is located
permits such acquisitions. Interstate mergers and branch acquisitions will also
be subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration amounts
described above.
The Riegle-Neal Act authorizes the OCC and FDIC to approve interstate
branching de novo by national and state banks, respectively, only in states
which specifically allow for such branching. The Riegle-Neal Act also requires
the appropriate federal banking agencies to prescribe regulations by June 1,
1997 which prohibit any out-of-state bank from using the interstate branching
authority primarily for the purpose of deposit production. These regulations
must include guidelines to ensure that interstate branches operated by an
out-of-state bank in a host state are reasonably helping to meet the credit
needs of the communities which they serve.
The BHCA also prohibits, with certain exceptions, a bank holding
company from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5%
of the voting shares of a company that is not a bank or a bank holding company,
or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of
banking, managing or controlling
22
<PAGE>
banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to
these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities which, by statute or by
Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been identified as activities
closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks. The
activities of the Company are subject to these legal and regulatory limitations
under the BHCA and the Federal Reserve Board's regulations thereunder.
Notwithstanding the Federal Reserve Board's prior approval of specific
nonbanking activities, the Federal Reserve Board has the power to order a
holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any activity, or to terminate
its ownership or control of any subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to
believe that the continuation of such activity or such ownership or control
constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of
any bank subsidiary of that holding company.
Capital Adequacy. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted guidelines
regarding the capital adequacy of bank holding companies, which require bank
holding companies to maintain specified minimum ratios of capital to total
assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. See "-- Regulation of the Bank --
Capital Adequacy."
Dividends and Distributions. The Federal Reserve Board has the power to
prohibit dividends by bank holding companies if their actions constitute unsafe
or unsound practices. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on
the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expresses the
Federal Reserve Board's view that a bank holding company should pay cash
dividends only to the extent that the company's net income for the past year is
sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention that
is consistent with the company's capital needs, asset quality, and overall
financial condition.
Bank holding companies are required to give the Federal Reserve Board
notice of any purchase or redemption of their outstanding equity securities if
the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the
net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the
preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the bank holding company's
consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase
or redemption if it determines that the proposal would violate any law,
regulation, Federal Reserve Board order, directive, or any condition imposed by,
or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. Bank holding companies
whose capital ratios exceed the thresholds for "well capitalized" banks on a
consolidated basis are exempt from the foregoing requirement if they were rated
composite 1 or 2 in their most recent inspection and are not the subject of any
unresolved supervisory issues.
Regulation of the Bank
General. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to the primary
supervision of the OCC under the National Bank Act. The OCC regularly examines
the operations of the Bank, including but not limited to capital adequacy,
reserves, loans, investments and management practices. These examinations are
for the protection of the Bank's depositors and not its shareholders. In
addition, the Bank is required to furnish quarterly and annual reports to the
OCC. The OCC's enforcement authority includes the power to remove officers and
directors and the authority to issue cease-and-desist orders to prevent a bank
from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices or violating laws or regulations
governing its business.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and its deposits are
insured by the FDIC to the legal maximum of $100,000 for each insured depositor.
Some of the aspects of the lending and deposit business of the Bank that are
subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC include reserve
requirements and disclosure requirements in connection with personal and
mortgage loans and savings deposit accounts. In addition, the Bank is subject to
numerous federal and state laws and regulations which set forth specific
restrictions and procedural requirements with respect to the establishment of
branches, investments, interest rates on loans, credit practices, the disclosure
of credit terms and discrimination in credit transactions.
Capital Adequacy. The Federal Reserve Board and the OCC have
established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of
capital by bank holding companies and national banks, respectively. The
regulations impose two sets of capital adequacy requirements: minimum leverage
rules, which require bank holding
23
<PAGE>
companies and banks to maintain a specified minimum ratio of capital to total
assets, and risk-based capital rules, which require the maintenance of specified
minimum ratios of capital to "risk-weighted" assets.
The regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC require bank
holding companies and national banks, respectively, to maintain a minimum
leverage ratio of "Tier 1 capital" (as defined in the risk-based capital
guidelines discussed in the following paragraphs) to total assets of 3.0%.
Although setting a minimum 3.0% leverage ratio, the capital regulations state
that only the strongest bank holding companies and banks, with composite
examination ratings of 1 under the rating system used by the federal bank
regulators, would be permitted to operate at or near such minimum level of
capital. All other bank holding companies and banks are expected to maintain a
leverage ratio of at least 1% to 2% above the minimum ratio, depending on the
assessment of an individual organization's capital adequacy by its primary
regulator. Any bank or bank holding company experiencing or anticipating
significant growth would be expected to maintain capital well above the minimum
levels. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that whenever
appropriate, and in particular when a bank holding company is undertaking
expansion, seeking to engage in new activities or otherwise facing unusual or
abnormal risks, it will consider, on a case-by-case basis, the level of an
organization's ratio of tangible Tier 1 capital (after deducting all
intangibles) to total assets in making an overall assessment of capital.
The risk-based capital rules of the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC
require bank holding companies and state member banks to maintain minimum
regulatory capital levels based upon a weighting of their assets and off-balance
sheet obligations according to risk. The risk-based capital rules have two basic
components: a core capital (Tier 1) requirement and a supplementary capital
(Tier 2) requirement. Core capital consists primarily of common stockholders'
equity, certain perpetual preferred stock (which must be noncumulative with
respect to banks), and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated
subsidiaries; less all intangible assets, except for certain purchased mortgage
servicing rights and purchased credit card relationships. Supplementary capital
elements include, subject to certain limitations, the allowance for losses on
loans and leases; perpetual preferred stock that does not qualify as Tier 1
capital and long-term preferred stock with an original maturity of at least 20
years from issuance; hybrid capital instruments, including perpetual debt and
mandatory convertible securities; and subordinated debt and intermediate-term
preferred stock.
The risk-based capital regulations assign balance sheet assets and
credit equivalent amounts of off-balance sheet obligations to one of four broad
risk categories based principally on the degree of credit risk associated with
the obligor. The assets and off-balance sheet items in the four risk categories
are weighted at 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%. These computations result in the total
risk-weighted assets. The risk-based capital regulations require all banks and
bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to total
risk-weighted assets of 8%, with at least 4% as core capital. For the purpose of
calculating these ratios: (i) supplementary capital will be limited to no more
than 100% of core capital; and (ii) the aggregate amount of certain types of
supplementary capital will be limited. In addition, the risk-based capital
regulations limit the allowance for loan losses includable as capital to 1.25%
of total risk-weighted assets.
OCC regulations and guidelines additionally specify that national banks
with significant exposure to declines in the economic value of their capital due
to changes in interest rates may be required to maintain higher risk-based
capital ratios. The federal banking agencies, including the OCC, have proposed a
system for measuring and assessing the exposure of a bank's net economic value
to changes in interest rates. The federal banking agencies, including the OCC,
have stated their intention to propose a rule establishing an explicit capital
charge for interest rate risk based upon the level of a bank's measured interest
rate risk exposure after more experience has been gained with the proposed
measurement process. Federal Reserve Board regulations do not specifically take
into account interest rate risk in measuring the capital adequacy of bank
holding companies.
The OCC has issued final regulations which classify national banks by
capital levels and which provide for the OCC to take various prompt corrective
actions to resolve the problems of any bank that fails to satisfy the capital
standards. Under such regulations, a well-capitalized bank is one that is not
subject to any regulatory order or directive to meet any specific capital level
and that has or exceeds the following capital levels: a total risk-based
24
<PAGE>
capital ratio of 10%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%, and a leverage
ratio of 5%. An adequately capitalized bank is one that does not qualify as
well-capitalized but meets or exceeds the following capital requirements: a
total risk-based capital ratio of 8%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4%,
and a leverage ratio of either (i) 4% or (ii) 3% if the bank has the highest
composite examination rating. A bank not meeting these criteria is treated as
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized
depending on the extent to which the bank's capital levels are below these
standards. A national bank that falls within any of the three undercapitalized
categories established by the prompt corrective action regulation will be
subject to severe regulatory sanctions. As of December 31, 1996, the Bank was
well-capitalized as defined by the OCC's regulations.
For information regarding the Bank's compliance with its regulatory
capital requirements, see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Branching. Under the McFadden Act of 1927, national banks may only
establish branches to the extent specifically authorized by statute for banks
chartered by the state in which the national bank is located and subject to the
restrictions as to location imposed by state law on state banks. The Riegle-Neal
Act authorizes the OCC and FDIC to approve interstate branching de novo by
national and state banks, respectively, only in states which specifically allow
for such branching. The Riegle-Neal Act also requires the appropriate federal
banking agencies to prescribe regulations by June 1, 1997 which prohibit any
out-of-state bank from using the interstate branching authority primarily for
the purpose of deposit production. These regulations must include guidelines to
ensure that interstate branches operated by an out-of-state bank in a host state
are reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of the communities which they
serve.
Dividend Limitations. Pursuant to the National Bank Act, no national
bank may pay dividends from its paid-in capital. All dividends must be paid out
of current or retained net profits, after deducting reserves for losses and bad
debts. The National Bank Act further restricts the payment of dividends out of
net profits by prohibiting a national bank from declaring a dividend on its
shares of common stock until the surplus fund equals the amount of capital stock
or, if the surplus fund does not equal the amount of capital stock, until
one-tenth of a bank's net profits for the preceding half year in the case of
quarterly or semi-annual dividends, or the preceding two half-year periods in
the case of annual dividends, are transferred to the surplus fund. Prior OCC
approval is required for the payment of a dividend if the total of all dividends
declared by a national bank in any calendar year would exceed the total of its
net profits for that year combined with its net profits for the two preceding
years, less any required transfers to surplus or a fund for the retirement of
any preferred stock. In addition, the Bank is prohibited by federal statute from
paying dividends or making any other capital distribution that would cause the
Bank to fail to meet its regulatory capital requirements. Further, the OCC also
has authority to prohibit the payment of dividends by a national bank when it
determines such payment to be an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Deposit Insurance. Because the Bank was a savings association prior to
the Bank Conversion, its deposits continue to insured by the SAIF rather than by
the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") which generally insured the deposits of national
banks. The Bank is required to pay semi-annual assessments based on a percentage
of its insured deposits to the FDIC for insurance of its deposits by the SAIF.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC is required to set semi-annual
assessments for SAIF-insured institutions to maintain the designated reserve
ratio of the SAIF at 1.25% of estimated insured deposits or at a higher
percentage of estimated insured deposits that the FDIC determines to be
justified for that year by circumstances raising a significant risk of
substantial future losses to the SAIF.
Under the risk-based deposit insurance assessment system adopted by the
FDIC, the assessment rate for an insured depository institution depends on the
assessment risk classification assigned to the institution by the FDIC, which is
determined by the institution's capital level and supervisory evaluations. Based
on the data reported to regulators for the date closest to the last day of the
seventh month preceding the semi-annual assessment period, institutions are
assigned to one of three capital groups -- "well capitalized," "adequately
capitalized" or "undercapitalized." Within each capital group, institutions are
assigned to one of three subgroups on the basis of
25
<PAGE>
supervisory evaluations by the institution's primary supervisory authority and
such other information as the FDIC determines to be relevant to the
institution's financial condition and the risk posed to the deposit insurance
fund.
For the past several semi-annual periods, institutions with
SAIF-assessable deposits, like the Bank, have been required to pay higher
deposit insurance premiums than institutions with deposits insured by the BIF.
In order to recapitalize the SAIF and address the premium disparity, the
recently-enacted Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 authorized the FDIC to
impose a one-time special assessment on institutions with SAIF-assessable
deposits based on the amount determined by the FDIC to be necessary to increase
the reserve levels of the SAIF to the designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of
insured deposits. Institutions were assessed at the rate of 65.7 basis points
based on the amount of their SAIF-assessable deposits as of March 31, 1995. As a
result of the special assessment the Bank incurred an expense of $351,000 during
the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
The FDIC has adopted a new assessment schedule for SAIF deposit
insurance pursuant to which the assessment rate for well-capitalized
institutions with the highest supervisory ratings would be reduced to zero and
institutions in the lowest risk assessment classification will be assessed at
the rate of 0.27% of insured deposits. Until December 31, 1999, however,
SAIF-insured institutions, will be required to pay assessments to the FDIC at
the rate of 6.5 basis points to help fund interest payments on certain bonds
issued by the Financing Corporation ("FICO") an agency of the federal government
established to finance takeovers of insolvent thrifts. During this period, BIF
members will be assessed for these obligations at the rate of 1.3 basis points.
After December 31, 1999, both BIF and SAIF members will be assessed at the same
rate for FICO payments.
Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between a national bank and
any affiliate are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act.
An affiliate of a national bank is any company or entity which controls, is
controlled by or is under common control with the national bank. In a holding
company context, the parent holding company of a national bank (such as the
Company) and any companies which are controlled by such parent holding company
are affiliates of the national bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B (i) limit
the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in "covered
transactions" with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such bank's
capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on all such
transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock
and surplus and (ii) require that all such transactions be on terms
substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the institution or
subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term "covered transaction"
includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and
similar other types of transactions. In addition to the restrictions imposed by
Sections 23A and 23B, no national bank may (i) loan or otherwise extend credit
to an affiliate, except for any affiliate which engages only in activities which
are permissible for bank holding companies, or (ii) purchase or invest in any
stocks, bonds, debentures, notes or similar obligations of any affiliate, except
for affiliates which are subsidiaries of the national bank. The BHCA further
prohibits a depository institution from extending credit to or offering any
other services, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of
credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional
service from the institution or certain of its affiliates or not obtain services
of a competitor of the institution, subject to certain exceptions.
Loans to Directors, Executive Officers and Principal Stockholders.
National banks are also subject to the restrictions contained in Section 22(h)
and 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act on loans to executive officers, directors
and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h), loans to a director, executive
officer or greater than 10% stockholder of a national bank and certain
affiliated interests of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other
outstanding loans to such person and affiliated interests, the bank's loans to
one borrower limit (generally equal to 15% of the institution's unimpaired
capital and surplus) and all loans to such persons may not exceed the
institution's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also
prohibits loans, above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal banking
agency, to directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders of a
national bank, and their respective affiliates, unless such loan is approved in
advance by a majority of the board of directors of the association with any
"interested" director not participating in the voting. The Federal Reserve Board
has prescribed the loan amount (which includes all other outstanding loans to
such person), as to which such prior board of director approval if required, as
being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000).
26
<PAGE>
Further, the Federal Reserve Board pursuant to Section 22(h) requires that loans
to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders be made on terms
substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons
unless the loan is made pursuant to a benefit or compensation plan that is
widely available to other employees and does not give preference to insiders.
Section 22(h) also prohibits a depository institution from paying the overdrafts
of any of its executive officers or directors. Section 22(g) of the Federal
Reserve Act requires that loans to executive officers of depository institutions
be approved by the board of directors of the institution, and imposes reporting
requirements for and additional restrictions on the type, amount and terms of
credits to such officers. In addition, Section 106 of the BHCA prohibits
extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, and greater than 10%
stockholders of a depository institution by any other institution which has a
correspondent banking relationship with the institution, unless such extension
of credit is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with other persons and does not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
Item 2. Properties
- -------------------
The following table sets forth the location and certain additional
information regarding the Bank's offices at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Book Value at Deposits at
Year Owned or December 31, Approximate December 31,
Opened Leased 1996 Square Footage 1996
------ ------ -------------- -------------- ------------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Main Office:
318 South Park Avenue
Herrin, Illinois 62948 1949 Owned $ 348 4,678 $ 47,594
Branch Office:
New Route 13 East
Carterville, Illinois 62918 1975 Owned 131 1,895 5,238
</TABLE>
The net book value of the Bank's investment in premises and equipment
totaled approximately $479,000 at December 31, 1996. For a discussion of
premises and equipment, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
- --------------------------
From time to time, the Bank is a party to various legal proceedings
incident to its business. At December 31, 1996, there were no other legal
proceedings to which the Company or the Bank was a party, or to which any of
their property was subject, which were expected by management to result in a
material loss to the Company or the Bank.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
- ----------------------------------------------------------
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
27
<PAGE>
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholders'
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matters
-------
The Company's common stock is listed over-the-counter through the
National Daily Quotation System "Pink Sheets" published by the National
Quotation Bureau, Inc. As of December 31, 1996, there were 876,875 shares of
common stock outstanding and approximately 296 holders of record of the common
stock.
The following table sets forth the high and low bid price for the
common stock and dividends declared by quarter since trading in the common stock
commenced on July 1, 1996. This information was provided by Trident Securities,
Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without
retain mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual
transactions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Quarter Ended High Low Dividends Declared
------------- ---- --- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
September 30, 1996 $13.25 $10.00 $0.10
December 31, 1996 $15.50 $13.00 $0.10
</TABLE>
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
General
The Company completed its initial public offering on June 28, 1996 in
connection with the Conversion. A total of 876,875 shares of Common Stock were
sold which resulted in net proceeds of $7.4 million. The Company acquired all of
the capital stock of the Association (now, the Bank) in exchange for a portion
of the net proceeds.
The Bank's net income is dependent primarily on its net interest
income, which is the difference between interest income earned on its loan and
mortgage-backed and related securities portfolio and interest paid on
interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is determined by (i) the
difference between yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on
interest-bearing liabilities ("interest rate spread") and (ii) the relative
amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Bank's
interest rate spread is affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors
that influence interest rates, loan demand and deposit flows. To a lesser
extent, the Bank's net income also is affected by the level of non-interest
income, including fees and service charges, and by the level of its non-interest
expenses, the most significant component of which is salaries and employee
benefits.
The operations of the Bank are significantly affected by prevailing
economic conditions, competition and the monetary, fiscal and regulatory
policies of governmental agencies. Lending activities are influenced by the
demand for and supply of housing, competition among lenders, the level of
interest rates and the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of funds
are influenced by prevailing market rates of interest, primarily on competing
investments, account maturities and the levels of personal income and savings in
the Bank's market area.
The Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996
Prior to the Association's decision to convert to a stock institution
and to a national bank, the Association computed its income taxes utilizing the
special bad debt deduction available to thrift institutions under the Internal
Revenue Code. Generally, a thrift institution was permitted to deduct the
greater of an amount based upon its historical loss experience (the "experience
method") or an amount equal to 8.0% of its taxable income (the "percentage of
taxable income method"). National banks were not permitted to use the percentage
of taxable income method. At the time the Board of Directors adopted the Plan of
Conversion, the law in effect at that time required that the entire amount of
the bad debt deduction that exceeded the deduction permitted to non-thrift
institutions (the
28
<PAGE>
"excess bad debt reserves") be recaptured into income and
taxes on such amounts be recognized. As a result of this provision, the
Association recognized income taxes of $450,000 during the year ended December
31, 1995.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Small Business Job Protection Act
of 1996 (the "Small Business Act") was enacted into law. Under the Small
Business Act, for years beginning after 1995, all thrift institutions are
required to recapture excess bad debt reserves over a six-year period. However,
pre-1988 reserves are not included in these excess bad debt reserves. As the
Conversion had not occurred as of December 31, 1995, the effective date of the
Small Business Act, the Bank was still a thrift institution as of that date.
Consequently, it has been determined that, as a result of the Small Business
Act, the pre-1988 reserves will not be required to be recaptured into taxable
income. As a result, in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," the
$450,000 increase in income taxes recognized during 1995 was reversed during
1996 which resulted in a $450,000 decrease in income tax expense and deferred
income taxes as of December 31, 1996.
SAIF Assessment
During the quarter ended September 30, 1996, the Company incurred a
charge of $351,000 as the result of the imposition of a special assessment by
the FDIC to recapitalize the SAIF. The FDIC operates two deposit insurance
funds: the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") which generally insures the deposits of
commercial banks and the SAIF which generally insures the deposits of savings
association. Since the Bank was originally chartered as a savings association,
its deposits continue to be insured by the SAIF rather than the BIF. Because the
reserves of the SAIF had been below statutorily required minimums, institutions
with SAIF-assessable deposits, like the Bank, had been required to pay
substantially higher deposit insurance premiums than institutions with deposits
insured by the BIF for the past several semi-annual periods. In order the
recapitalize the SAIF and address the premium disparity, the recently-enacted
Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 authorized the FDIC to impose a one-time
special assessment on institutions with SAIF-assessable deposits based on the
amount determined by the FDIC to be necessary to increase the reserve levels of
the SAIF to the designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of insured deposits.
Institutions were assessed at the rate of 65.7 basis points based on the amount
of their SAIF-assessable deposits at March 31, 1995.
The FDIC has adopted a new assessment schedule for SAIF deposit
insurance pursuant to which the assessment rate for institutions in the lowest
risk assessment classification was reduced to zero and institutions in the
highest risk assessment classification will be assessed at the rate of 27 basis
points. Until December 31, 1999, however, SAIF insured institutions will be
required to pay assessments to the FDIC at the rate of 6.5 basis points to help
fund interest payments on certain bonds issued by the Financing Corporation
("FICO"), an agency of the federal government established to finance takeovers
of insolvent thrifts. During this period, BIF members will be assessed for FICO
obligations at the rate of 1.3 basis points. After December 31, 1999, both BIF
and SAIF members will be assessed at the same rate for FICO payments.
The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 provides that the BIF and the
SAIF will be merged into a single Deposit Insurance Fund effective December 31,
1999 but only if there are no insured savings associations on that date. The
legislation directs the Department of Treasury to make recommendations to
Congress by March 31, 1997 for the establishment of a single charter for banks
and thrifts.
Asset/Liability Management
The Bank has sought to reduce its exposure to changes in interest rates
by matching more closely the effective maturities or repricing characteristics
of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The matching of
the Bank's assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to
which its assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive.
29
<PAGE>
The Company's Board of Directors reviews the maturities of the
Company's assets and liabilities and establishes policies and strategies
designed to regulate the Company's flow of funds and to coordinate the sources,
uses and pricing of such funds. The first priority in structuring and pricing
the Company's and the Bank's assets and liabilities is to maintain an acceptable
interest rate spread while reducing the net effects of changes in interest
rates.
The Bank has employed various strategies intended to minimize the
adverse effect of interest rate risk on future operations by providing a better
match between the interest rate sensitivity between its assets and liabilities.
In particular, the Bank's strategies are intended to stabilize net interest
income for the long term by protecting its interest rate spread from increases
in interest rates. Such strategies include the origination in the loan portfolio
of adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by one- to four-family residential
real estate, and, to a lesser extent, multi-family and commercial real estate
loans and the origination of other loans with greater interest rate
sensitivities than long-term, fixed-rate, residential mortgage loans. For the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 approximately 51.60% and 47.54%,
respectively, of the one- to four-family residential loans originated by the
Bank had adjustable rates. The Bank's origination of multi-family, church and
commercial real estate loans comprised 8.38% and 12.56% of total loan
originations during the same respective periods.
In order to increase the interest rate sensitivity of its assets, the
Company has also maintained a consistent level of short and intermediate term
investment securities and other assets. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had $3.0
million of investment securities and interest-bearing deposits maturing or
repricing within one year and $10.0 million of investment securities,
mortgage-backed securities and interest-bearing deposits maturing or repricing
within one to five years.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the
extent to which such assets and liabilities are "interest rate sensitive" and by
monitoring an institution's interest rate sensitivity "gap." An asset or
liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific period if it
will mature or reprice within that period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is
defined as the difference between the amount of interest-earning assets maturing
or repricing within a specific time period and the amount of interest-bearing
liabilities maturing or repricing within that time period. A gap is considered
positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of
interest rate sensitive liabilities, and is considered negative when the amount
of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate
sensitive assets. At December 31, 1996, the Bank had a cumulative positive
one-year interest rate sensitivity gap of 0.94%, as a result of which its net
interest income could be slightly positively affected by rising interest rates
and slightly negatively affected by falling interest rates. Generally, during a
period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would adversely affect net
interest income while a positive gap would result in an increase in net interest
income, while conversely during a period of falling interest rates, a negative
gap would result in an increase in net interest income and a positive gap would
adversely affect net interest income.
30
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the amounts of interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at December 31, 1996 which are
expected to mature or reprice in each of the time periods shown. This table
reflects the Bank's assets and liabilities only and does not reflect the
Company's consolidated balances.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Over One Over Five Over Ten Over
One Year Through Through Through Twenty
or Less Five Years Ten Years Twenty Years Years Total
-------- ---------- --------- ------------ ------ -----
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Single-family mortgage loans............ $ 17,485 $ 9,319 $ 4,771 $ 1,627 $ 6 $ 33,208
Investment securities................... 1,285 5,429 1,756 60 -- 8,530
Mortgage-backed securities.............. 4,058 3,821 881 419 61 9,240
Other short-term investments............ 1,345 95 -- -- -- 1,440
Other loans............................. 4,676 2,678 1,157 411 -- 8,922
-------------- --------- --------- ---------- ------ ---------
Total................................ 28,849 21,342 8,565 2,517 67 61,340
-------------- --------- --------- ---------- ------ ---------
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts............................ 2,948 4,778 1,043 160 2 8,931
Passbook/Christmas club................. 2,237 3,627 792 121 2 6,779
Time deposits........................... 23,072 13,941 -- -- -- 37,013
-------------- --------- -------- ---------- ------ ---------
Total................................ 28,257 22,346 1,835 281 4 52,723
-------------- --------- -------- ---------- ------ ---------
Interest sensitivity gap................... $ 592 $ (1,004) $ 6,730 $ 2,236 $ 63 $ 8,617
============== ========= ======== ========== ====== =========
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap........ $ 592 $ (412) $ 6,318 $ 8,554 $8,617 $ 8,617
============== ========= ======== ========== ====== =========
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities......... 102.10% 95.51% 466.76% 895.73% 1675.00% 116.34%
============== ========= ======== ========== ====== =========
Ratio of cumulative gap to total assets.... 0.94% (0.65)% 10.01% 13.55% 13.65% 13.65%
============== ========= ======== ========== ====== =========
</TABLE>
The preceding table was prepared utilizing certain assumptions
regarding prepayment and decay rates provided by a private data processing and
consulting firm. While management believes that these assumptions are
reasonable, the actual interest rate sensitivity of the Bank's assets and
liabilities could vary significantly from the information set forth in the table
due to market and other factors. The following assumptions were used: (i)
adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities will prepay at the rate of 20.4% per
year for six month securities and 16.9% for one-year securities; (ii) fixed rate
mortgage-backed securities will prepay annually as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Coupon Rate Annual Prepayment Rate
----------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
Up to 6% 6.3%
6.01 to 7.00 7.3
8.01 to 9.00 13.9
</TABLE>
(iii) adjustable rate first mortgage loans on single-family residential
properties will prepay at the rate of 20.4% per year; (iv) nonresidential
mortgage loans will prepay at the rate of 11.7% per year for fixed rate and
18.9% per year for adjustable rate; (v) home equity loans will prepay at the
rate of 11.7% per year; (vi) consumer loans will prepay at the rate of 15.0% per
year; and (vii) fixed rate mortgage loans on single-family residential
properties will prepay annually as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Coupon Rate Annual Prepayment Rate
----------- ----------------------
<S> <C>
7.01 to 8.00% 10.2%
8.01 to 9.00 13.9
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
In addition, it is assumed that fixed maturity deposits are not
withdrawn prior to maturity and that other deposits are withdrawn or repriced at
an annual rate of 33.0%.
The interest rate sensitivity of the Bank's assets and liabilities
illustrated in the table above could vary substantially if different assumptions
were used or actual experience differs from the assumptions used. If passbook
and NOW accounts were assumed to mature in one year or less (which does not
reflect actual experience), the Bank's one-year gap would have been
substantially negative.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented
in the preceding table setting forth the maturing and repricing of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. For example, although
certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to
repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest
rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may
fluctuate in advance of change in market interest rates, while interest rates on
other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain
assets, such as adjustable rate loans, have features which restrict changes in
interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the assets. In
addition, the proportion of adjustable rate loans in the Bank's portfolio could
decrease in future periods if market interest rates remain at or decrease below
current levels due to refinancing activity. Further, in the event of a change in
interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate
significantly from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of many
borrowers to service their adjustable rate debt may decrease in the event of an
interest rate increase.
32
<PAGE>
Average Balance, Interest and Average Yields and Rates
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the
Company's average interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and
reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the
periods and at the date indicated. Such yields and costs are derived by dividing
income or expense by the average monthly balance of assets or liabilities,
respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances are derived from
month-end balances. Management does not believe that the use of month-end
balances instead of daily balances has caused any material difference in the
information presented. The table also presents information for the periods and
at the date indicated with respect to the difference between the average yield
earned on interest-earning assets and average rate paid on interest-bearing
liabilities, or "interest rate spread," which savings institutions have
traditionally used as an indicator of profitability. Another indicator of an
institution's net interest income is its "net yield on interest-earning assets,"
which is its net interest income divided by the average balance of
interest-earning assets. Net interest income is affected by the interest rate
spread and by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31, Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1996 1995
---------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Average Average
Balance Yield/Cost Balance Interest Yield/Cost Balance Interest Yield/Cost
------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ----------
(Dollars in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable................ $41,466 8.00% $38,067 $ 2,981 7.83% $31,910 $ 2,500 7.83%
Investment securities........... 11,138 5.58 9,863 580 5.88 11,231 615 5.48
Mortgage-backed securities...... 9,477 6.33 9,389 586 6.24 10,662 684 6.42
Short-term investments and other
interest-earning assets...... 1,440 5.82 5,252 284 5.40 3,435 208 6.06
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total interest-earning assets 63,521 7.28 62,571 4,431 7.08 57,238 4,007 7.00
------- -------
Noninterest-earning assets......... 2,335 2,860 2,405
------- ------- -------
Total assets................. $65,856 65,431 $59,643
======= ======= =======
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits......................... $52,584 5.08 $55,213 $ 2,719 4.92 $53,758 2,629 4.89
Total interest-bearing
liabilities.................... 52,584 5.08 55,213 2,719 4.92 53,758 2,629 4.89
-------
Noninterest-bearing liabilities.... 656 928 829
------- ------- -------
Total liabilities............ 53,240 56,141 54,587
Stockholders' equity............... 12,616 9,290 5,056
------- ------- -------
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity....... $65,856 $65,431 $59,643
======= ======= =======
Net interest income................ $ 1,712 $ 1,378
======= =======
Interest rate spread............... 2.20% 2.16% 2.11%
==== ==== ====
Net yield on interest-earning
assets.......................... 3.07% 2.74% 2.41%
==== ==== ====
Ratio of average interest-earning
assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities.... 120.80% 113.33% 106.47%
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
Rate/Volume Analysis
The table below sets forth certain information regarding changes in
interest income and interest expense of the Company for the periods indicated.
For each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability,
information is provided on changes attributable to: (i) changes in volume
(changes in volume multiplied by old rate); (ii) changes in rate (change in rate
multiplied by old volume) and (iii) changes in rate-volume (changes in rate
multiplied by the changes in volume).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1996 vs. 1995
--------------------------------------------------
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
--------------------------------------------------
Rate/
Volume Rate Volume Total
------ ---- ------ -----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans receivable............................... $ 481 $ -- $ -- $ 481
Investment securities.......................... (75) 46 (6) (35)
Mortgage-backed securities..................... (81) (19) 2 (98)
Short-term investments and
other interest-earning assets............... 110 (22) (12) 76
-------- ----- ------ --------
Total interest-earning assets............... 435 5 (16) 424
-------- ----- ------ --------
Interest expense:
Deposits....................................... 70 20 -- 90
Total interest-bearing
liabilities............................... 70 20 -- 90
-------- ----- ------ --------
Change in net interest income..................... $ 365 $ (15) $ (16) $ 334
======== ===== ====== ========
</TABLE>
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995
The Company's total assets increased by $4.5 million, or 7.42%, from
$61.3 million at December 31, 1995 to $65.9 million at December 31, 1996.
Total net loans increased by approximately $6.4 million during the year
ended December 31, 1996. Net loans totaled $41.5 million and $35.1 million at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The increase in loan activity during
the year ended December 31, 1996 is due to increased marketing activities and
increased loan demand in the Company's market area.
The allowance for loan losses totalled $300,000 at December 31, 1996
and 1995. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans
was 60.85% and 52.63% as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. During
1996, loan charge-offs amounted to $5,000. An additional provision of $5,000 was
made during the year. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is
based on management's analysis, performed on a quarterly basis, of various
factors, including the market value of the underlying collateral, growth and
composition of the loan portfolio, the relationship of the allowance for loan
losses to outstanding loans, historical loss experience, delinquency trends and
prevailing economic conditions. Although management believes its allowance for
loan losses is adequate, there can be no assurance that additional allowances
will not be required or that losses on loans will not be incurred.
At December 31, 1996, the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans
was 1.19%, as compared to 1.63% at December 31, 1995. The decrease in the ratio
is primarily the result of increased collection efforts. At December
34
<PAGE>
31, 1996, the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 0.72%,
as compared to 0.86% at December 31, 1995. The decrease in this ratio was due to
the growth in the loan portfolio during 1996.
At December 31, 1996, the Company's investment portfolio included
mortgage-backed and related securities available for sale carried at a market
value of $2.8 million and mortgage-backed and related securities classified as
"held to maturity" totaling $6.7 million. The balance of the Company's
investment portfolio at December 31, 1996 consisted of investment securities
classified as available for sale totaling $2.1 million and investment securities
classified as held to maturity totaling $9.0 million.
At December 31, 1996, deposits decreased to $52.8 million from $55.6
million at December 31, 1995 for a net decrease of 5.03%. The decrease in
deposits was primarily attributable to depositors using funds to purchase Common
Stock in the Stock Conversion.
Certificates of deposit at December 31, 1996 included approximately
$2.5 million of deposits with balances of $100,000 or more that mature within
one year. Such time deposits are inherently risky because their continued
presence in the Bank is usually dependent solely upon the rates paid by the Bank
rather than any customer relationship and, therefore, are likely to be withdrawn
upon maturity if another institution offers higher interest rates. The Bank may
be required to resort to other funding sources such as borrowing or sales of its
securities held available for sale if the Bank believes that increasing its
rates to maintain such deposits would adversely affect its operating results. At
this time, the Bank does not believe that it will need to significantly increase
its deposit rates to maintain such certificates of deposit and, therefore, does
not anticipate resorting to alternative funding sources.
Total stockholders' equity at December 31, 1996 amounted to $12.6
million, an increase of $7.9 million, or 165.6%, due to the net proceeds from
the Company's stock offering which amounted to $8.1 million and the retention of
earnings from the period, partially offset by the issuance of shares to the ESOP
and cash dividends of $161,000 paid during the period. See "--Liquidity and
Capital Ratios" for a discussion of the Bank's compliance with applicable
regulatory capital requirements.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
Net Income. For the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company earned
net income of $529,000, an increase of approximately $826,000, or 278.11%,
compared to a net loss of $297,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. The
improvement in 1996 over 1995 was primarily due to the passage of legislation
which enabled the Bank to reverse a $450,000 tax accrual which had been
recognized during fiscal year 1995 as a result of the decision to convert from a
federal thrift to a national bank. See "--The Small Business Job Protection Act
of 1996" and Note 10 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $334,000, or
24.24%, from $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 to $1.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase in net interest income
reflects the increased level of interest earning assets due to the deployment of
the net proceeds from the Company's initial public offering. The average balance
of interest earning assets increased from $57.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 1995 to $62.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. The
ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
increased from 106.47% for the year ended December 31, 1995 to 113.33% for the
year ended December 31, 1996. The interest rate spread of the Company increased
by 5 basis points from 2.11% for the year ended December 31, 1995 to 2.16% for
the year ended December 31, 1996 as the 3 basis point increase in the average
cost of interest bearing liabilities was more than offset by the 8 basis point
increase in the average yield on interest earning assets. The slight improvement
in the average yield was due to the increased balance of higher yielding loans
during fiscal year 1996 as compared to fiscal year 1995.
Interest Income. Total interest income increased by $424,000, or
10.58%, from $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 to $4.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 1996. The increase was due primarily to the
growth in the Bank's loan portfolio during fiscal year 1996. Average loans
outstanding during 1996 were $38.1 million as compared to $31.9 million during
fiscal year 1995. As a result, interest income from loans increased by $481,000,
or 19.24%, during the period. Offsetting this increase was a $98,000 drop in
income from
35
<PAGE>
mortgage-backed securities which was primarily attributable to a decrease in the
average balance of such securities from $10.7 million during fiscal year 1995 to
$9.4 million during fiscal year 1996.
Income from investment securities and short term deposits was
relatively comparable on a year to year basis, increasing slightly from $823,000
for fiscal year 1995 to $864,000 for fiscal year 1996 due to the combined
effects of an improved yield on such securities and an increase in the average
balance of such securities during the period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, which consists entirely of interest
on deposits, increased by $90,000, or 3.42%, from $2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 1995 to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1996.
This increase was primarily due to an increase of $1.5 million, or 2.71%, in the
average balance of deposits from $53.8 million for the year ended December 31,
1995 to $55.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1996. Pursuant to the
requirements of the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), the Company was
required to offer its Common Stock first to depositors and other members of the
mutual Association as of specified record dates in a subscription offering.
Subscription funds were held on deposit at the Bank. Although the subscription
offering ended on May 16, 1996, the actual offering did not close until June 28,
1996 due to a delay in receipt of the final required regulatory approvals
necessary to effect the Bank Conversion. Subsequent to June 28, 1996, these
subscription funds were converted from deposits to the equity of the Company
which resulted in a decrease in deposit levels during the second half of fiscal
year 1996. At December 31, 1996, total consolidated deposits were $52.8 million.
Provision for Loan Losses. The Bank established a provision for loan
losses of $5,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996, a substantial decrease
from the $200,000 provision for loan losses made during fiscal year 1995.
Management determines the level of the allowance for loan losses based on its
analysis of various factors, including the market value of the underlying
collateral, growth and composition of the loan portfolio, the relationship of
the allowance for loan losses to outstanding loans, historical loss experience,
delinquency trends and prevailing and projected economic conditions.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income totaled $211,000 and $233,000
for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995. respectively. The largest
components of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
included $61,000 and $90,000, respectively, in loan and other service fees and
$135,000 in each of fiscal year 1995 and 1996, in other service charges and
other miscellaneous operating income.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased by $628,000, or
51.77%, from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 to $1.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 1996. Included within non-interest expense for
1996 was the special assessment which all SAIF-insured institutions were
required to pay during the third quarter of 1996. This assessment amounted to
$351,000 for the Bank. See "--SAIF Assessment." Compensation and employee
benefit expenses also rose by $180,000 from $523,000 in fiscal year 1995 to
$703,000 in fiscal year 1996. This resulted from normal salary expenses and the
additional costs associated with the Employee Stock Ownership Plan formed in
connection with the Conversion and the Director Retirement Plan which was
adopted effective December 31, 1995.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 as a percentage of income before income taxes was
(587.01)% and 250.00%, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to the ability of the Bank to convert assets into cash
or cash equivalents without significant loss. Liquidity management involves
evaluating the Bank's daily cash flow requirements to meet customer demands,
whether they are depositors wishing to withdraw funds or borrowers requiring
funds to meet their credit needs. Without proper liquidity management, the
Company would not be able to perform the primary function of a financial
intermediary and would, therefore not be able to meet the production and growth
needs of the communities it serves.
36
<PAGE>
The Bank's primary sources of funds are deposits and proceeds from
maturing investment securities, mortgage-backed and related securities and
principal and interest payments on loans, investment securities and
mortgage-backed and related securities. While maturities and scheduled
amortization of investment securities, mortgage-backed and related securities
and loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic
conditions, competition and other factors.
The primary investing activity of the Bank is the origination of loans,
the purchase of investment securities and certificates of deposit, and the
purchase of mortgage-backed and related securities. During the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Bank originated loans totaling $15.1 million and
$13.7 million, respectively. The primary financing activity of the Bank is
accepting savings deposits.
The Bank has other sources of liquidity if there is a need for funds.
As stated earlier, the Company has a portfolio of investment securities and
mortgage-backed and related securities with an aggregate market value of $4.9
million at December 31, 1996 classified as available for sale. Another source of
liquidity is the Bank's ability to obtain advances from the FHLB of Chicago. In
addition, the Bank maintains a significant portion of its investments in
interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions that will be available
when needed.
A strong capital position is important to the continued profitability
of the Bank because it promotes depositor and investor confidence and provides a
solid foundation for future growth. Under regulatory guidelines, the Bank's
capital strength is measured in two tiers which are used in conjunction with
risk-adjusted assets to calculate the risk-based capital ratios. The Bank's Tier
I risk-based capital ratio and total risk-based capital ratio were 29.2% and
29.4%, respectively at December 31, 1996. These levels currently exceed the
minimum ratios of 4% and 8%, respectively. Another important indicator of
capital adequacy in the banking industry is the leverage ratio, which is a
measure of the ratio of the Bank's Tier I capital to total average assets. The
Bank's leverage ratio was 14.7% at December 31, 1996, which exceeded regulatory
minimum guidelines.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto presented
herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the
relative purchasing power of money over time and due to inflation. The impact of
inflation is reflected in the increased cost of the Company's operations. Unlike
most industrial companies, nearly all the assets and liabilities of the Bank are
monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the
Company's performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation.
Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same
extent as the price of goods and services.
Impact of New Accounting Standards
Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans. The Accounting Standards
Division of the AICPA approved Statement of Position 93-6 (SOP 93-6).
"Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans," which is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993, applies to shares of capital
stock of sponsoring employers acquired by employee stock ownership plans after
December 31, 1992 that had not been committed to be released as of January 1,
1992. SOP 93-6 will, among other things, change the measure of compensation
recorded by employers from the cost of ESOP shares to the fair value of employee
stock ownership plan shares. To the extent that the fair value of the Company's
ESOP shares, committed to be released directly to compensate employees, differs
from the cost of such shares, compensation expenses and a related charge or
credit to additional paid-in capital will be reported in the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
During 1996, the Company adopted the ESOP. The Company is accounting
for the plan according to the provisions of SOP 93-6.
37
<PAGE>
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation" was issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") in October, 1995. SFAS No. 123 establishes a fair value-based method of
accounting for stock options and other equity instruments. It requires the use
of that method for transactions with other than employees and encourages its use
for transactions with employees. It permits entities to continue to use the
intrinsic value method included in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," but regardless of the method used to
account for the compensation cost associated with stock option and similar
plans, it requires employers to disclose information in accordance with SFAS No.
123. The general principle underlying SFAS No. 123 is that equity instruments
are recognized at the fair value of the consideration received for them. If the
fair value of the consideration received cannot be reasonably determined, the
fair value of the equity instrument itself may be used. The fair value method of
accounting for stock options and other instruments applies this general
principle measuring compensation cost for employers as the excess of the fair
value of the equity instrument over the amount paid by the employee. The
definition of fair value in SFAS No. 123 is the same as that included in SFAS
No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed of."
SFAS No. 123 requires significantly expanded disclosures, including
disclosure of the pro forma amount of net income (and earnings per share for
public entities) as if the fair value-based method were used to account for
stock-based compensation if the intrinsic value method of APB-25 is retained.
The recognition requirements for transactions with other than employees
apply for transactions entered into after December 15, 1995. The recognition
alternative of the fair value-based method for transactions with employees may
be implemented immediately upon issuance of SFAS No. 123. The disclosure
requirements, which apply regardless of the recognition method chosen, are
applicable for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1995.
With the adoption in 1997 of stock-based compensation plans, the
Company intends to follow the SFAS No. 123 guidelines as appropriate.
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. In March 1995, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of." SFAS No. 121 establishes
accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived assets, certain
identifiable intangibles, and goodwill related to those assets to be held and
used and for long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be
disposed of. The statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If, under the criteria of
the statement, an asset is impaired, an impairment loss is recognized. SFAS No.
121 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 1995. The Company
has adopted the provisions of the statement effective for the year ending
December 31, 1996. The adoption of SFAS No. 121 did not have a material effect
on the Company's financial position or operating results.
Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights. In May 1995, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights." SFAS No. 122 requires
that a mortgage banking enterprise recognize as separate assets rights to
service mortgage loans for others however those servicing rights are acquired. A
mortgage banking enterprise that acquires mortgage servicing rights through
either the purchase or origination of mortgage loans and sells or securitizes
those loans with servicing rights retained should allocate the total cost of the
mortgage loans to the mortgage servicing rights and the loans (without mortgage
servicing rights) based on their relative fair values if it is practicable to
estimate those fair values. If it is not practicable to estimate the fair values
of the mortgage servicing rights and the mortgage loans (without the servicing
rights), the entire cost of purchasing or originating the loans should be
allocated to the mortgage loans and no cost should be allocated to the mortgage
servicing rights. SFAS No. 122 also requires that a mortgage banking enterprise
assess its capitalized mortgage servicing rights for impairment based on the
fair value of those rights. SFAS No. 122 must be applied prospectively for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995, with earlier adoption
encouraged, to transactions in which a mortgage banking enterprise sells or
securitizes mortgage loans with servicing rights retained and to impairment
evaluations of all
38
<PAGE>
amounts capitalized as mortgage servicing rights, including those purchased
before the adoption of SFAS No. 122. Retroactive capitalization of mortgage
servicing rights retained in transactions in which a mortgage banking enterprise
originates mortgage loans and sells or securitizes those loans before the
adoption of SFAS No. 122 is prohibited. The Company has adopted the provision of
the statement for the year ending December 31, 1996. The adoption of SFAS No.
122 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
operating results.
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets. In June
1996, the FASB issued SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 125 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial
assets and extinguishments of liabilities based on the consistent application of
the financial components approach. This approach requires the recognition of
financial assets and servicing assets that are controlled by the reporting
entity, the derecognition of financial assets when control is surrendered, and
the derecognition of liabilities when they are extinguished. Specific criteria
are established for determining when control has been surrendered in the
transfer of financial assets. SFAS No. 125 is effective for transfers and
servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after
December 31, 1996. Subsequent to the issuance of SFAS No. 125, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 127, "Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of FASB
Statement No. 125." This statement defers for one year the effective date of
SFAS No. 125 as applies to secured borrowings and collateral and certain other
transactions. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 125, as amended
by SFAS No. 127, in 1997 and subsequent years as appropriate. The management of
the Company does not currently believe that the future adoption of this
statement will have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
operating results.
39
<PAGE>
Item 7. Financial Statements
- ----------------------------
[Letterhead of Gray Hunter Stenn]
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------
The Board of Directors
Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
Herrin, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition
of Heartland Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31,
1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Heartland
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Gray Hunter Stenn
Marion, Illinois
March 4, 1997
40
<PAGE>
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
--------------------------
AND SUBSIDIARY
--------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
----------------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
ASSETS 1996 1995
------ ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing $ 658 $ 2,581
Noninterest-bearing 1,214 1,682
Certificates of deposit 293 981
Investment securities available-for-sale at
estimated market value (amortized cost of $2,087
and $100, respectively) 2,108 102
Investment securities held-to-maturity (estimated market
value of $9,038 and $9,131, respectively) 9,030 9,120
Mortgage-backed and related securities available-for-
sale at estimated market value (amortized cost of
$2,860 and $7,309, respectively) 2,814 7,335
Mortgage-backed and related securities held-to-
maturity (estimated market value of $6,528 and
$3,180, respectively) 6,663 3,128
Loans receivable, net 41,466 35,060
Investments required by law 489 342
Property, equipment, and property held
for investment, net 479 572
Accrued interest receivable 316 233
Prepaid expenses and other assets 56 18
Prepaid income taxes 73 127
Foreclosed real estate 133 -
Other assets - 28
Deferred tax asset 64 -
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 65,856 $ 61,309
- ------------ ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
Liabilities
- -----------
Deposits $ 52,832 $ 55,632
Accrued interest on deposits 49 66
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance 252 380
Other liabilities 107 49
Deferred tax liability - 432
-------- --------
Total Liabilities $ 53,240 $ 56,559
----------------- -------- --------
Commitments and Contingencies
- -----------------------------
Stockholders' Equity
- --------------------
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, - 0 - issued $ - $ -
Common stock, $.01 par value per share: 4,000,000
shares authorized; 876,875 and - 0 - shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995 9 -
Additional paid-in capital 8,153 -
Unearned ESOP shares (632) -
Retained earnings - substantially restricted 5,101 4,733
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available-for-sale, net of tax (15) 17
-------- --------
Total Stockholders' Equity $ 12,616 $ 4,750
-------------------------- -------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 65,856 $ 61,309
- ------------------------------------------ ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
<PAGE>
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
--------------------------
AND SUBSIDIARY
--------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
---------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
-------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
------------------------
December 31,
1996 1995
---------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest Income
- ---------------
Interest on first mortgage loans $ 2,851 $ 2,417
Interest on other loans 130 83
Interest on investments, securities, and
deposits with banks 864 823
Interest on mortgage-backed securities 586 684
-------- --------
Total Interest Income $ 4,431 $ 4,007
---------------------
Interest Expense
- ----------------
Interest on deposits 2,719 2,629
-------- --------
Net Interest Income $ 1,712 $ 1,378
- -------------------
Provision for Loan Losses 5 200
- ------------------------- -------- --------
Net Interest Income After Provision
- -----------------------------------
for Loan Losses $ 1,707 $ 1,178
--------------- -------- --------
Non-Interest Income
- -------------------
Initial service charges and other loan fees $ 61 $ 90
Gain on sale of investments 13 7
Gain on sale of other real estate 2 1
Other 135 135
-------- --------
Total Non-Interest Income $ 211 $ 233
------------------------- -------- --------
Non-Interest Expense
- --------------------
Compensation to directors, officers, and
employees $ 571 $ 464
Pension expense and other employee benefits 132 59
Office properties and equipment expense
including depreciation 110 100
Advertising 38 38
Federal insurance premiums 95 123
Stationery, postage, and office supplies 64 59
Checking account expense 151 146
Service bureau expense 70 60
SAIF special assessment 351 -
Other 250 154
Loss on sale of other real estate - 10
Loss on sale of investments 3 -
Loss on sale of property held for investment 6 -
-------- --------
Total Non-Interest Expense $ 1,841 $ 1,213
-------------------------- -------- --------
Income Before Income Taxes $ 77 $ 198
- --------------------------
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (452) 495
-------- --------
Net Income (Loss) $ 529 $ (297)
- ----------------- ======== ========
Earnings per Share $ .45 $ N/A
- ------------------ ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
<PAGE>
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
-----------------------------------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
-----------------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
Additional Unearned on Securities
Common Paid-In ESOP Retained Available-
Stock Capital Shares Earnings for-Sale Total
------ ---------- -------- ------- ------------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1994 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,030 $ (227) $ 4,803
- ----------------------------
Net loss - - - (297) - (297)
Change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on securities available-
for-sale - - - - 244 244
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1995 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,733 $ 17 $ 4,750
- ----------------------------
Net income - - - 529 - 529
Sale of common stock 9 8,139 - - - 8,148
Cash dividends paid - - - (161) - (161)
Issuance of shares to ESOP - - (702) - - (702)
Amortization of ESOP expense - 14 70 - - 84
Change in net unrealized gain (loss)
on securities available-for-sale - - - - (32) (32)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1996 $ 9 $ 8,153 $ (632) $ 5,101 $ (15) $ 12,616
- ---------------------------- ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
<PAGE>
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
--------------------------
AND SUBSIDIARY
--------------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
-------------------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
---------------------
December 31,
1996 1995
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
- ------------------------------------
Net income $ 529 $ (297)
------- -------
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided (used) by operating
activities
Depreciation $ 47 $ 47
Discount accretion/premium amortization-securities, net (1) 10
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees (30) (30)
Amortization of ESOP expense 84 -
Provision for loan losses 5 200
(Gain) loss on sale of investments (10) (1)
(Gain) loss on sale of property held for investment 6 -
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate (2) 3
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable (83) 34
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses (38) (1)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid income taxes 54 (39)
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes (475) 413
(Increase) decrease in other assets (105) (28)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable (17) 3
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 58 (2)
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable - 1
-------- --------
Total Adjustments $ (507) $ 610
----------------- -------- --------
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities $ 22 $ 313
----------------------------------------- -------- --------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
- ------------------------------------
Net (increase) decrease in certificates of deposit $ 688 $ 2,754
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities
and mortgage-backed securities 4,785 5,170
Principal payments on mortgage-backed securities 1,280 836
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable (6,442) (7,942)
Purchases of property and equipment (72) (167)
Purchase of investment securities held-to-maturity (4,683) (155)
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity (4,146) (1,000)
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale (1,985) -
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale (248) -
Proceeds from sale of investment securities held-to-maturity - 50
Proceeds from sale of mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale 4,025 -
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock (24) -
Proceeds from the sale of property held for investment 112 -
Proceeds from sale of other real estate 63 4
Purchase of Federal Reserve Bank stock (123) -
-------- --------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities $ (6,770) $ (450)
------------------------------------- -------- --------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
- ------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in deposits $ (2,800) $ 2,033
Net increase (decrease) in mortgage escrow funds (128) (136)
Sale of stock 7,446 -
Dividends on common stock (161) -
-------- --------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities $ 4,357 $ 1,897
----------------------------------------- -------- --------
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents $ (2,391) $ 1,760
- ----------------------------------------------------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 4,263 2,503
-------- --------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 1,872 $ 4,263
- ---------------------------------------- ======== ========
Supplemental Disclosures
- ------------------------
Cash Paid During the Period for:
Interest $ 2,736 $ 2,626
Income taxes paid (refunded) $ (5) $ 138
Loans Transferred to Foreclosed Real Estate During Period $ 199 $ 28
Proceeds From Sales of Foreclosed Real Estate Financed Through Loans $ - $ 22
Schedule of Noncash Investing Activities:
- ----------------------------------------
FHLB Stock Dividend $ - $ 5
Securities transferred to available-for-sale $ - $ 4,116
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE>
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
--------------------------
AND SUBSIDIARY
--------------
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
--------------------------
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
------------------------------------------
The accounting and reporting policies of Heartland Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") and its subsidiary, Heartland National Bank (the "Bank"), are
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and conform to
general practices within the financial institution industry. The more
significant of the principles used in preparing the financial statements
are briefly described below.
Business
--------
The Company (through the Bank) provides a full range of financial services
to individual and corporate customers from two office locations in Herrin
and Carterville, Illinois. The Company is subject to competition from
other financial institutions in the area, is subject to the regulations of
certain federal agencies, and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
On June 28, 1996, First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Herrin
(the "Association") completed its conversion from a federal mutual savings
and loan association to a federal stock savings and loan association and
then from a stock association to a national bank known as Heartland
National Bank. Simultaneously, Heartland National Bank was acquired by
Heartland Bancshares, Inc. which was formed to act as the holding company
of the Bank. At the date of the conversion, the Company completed the sale
of 876,875 shares of $.01 par value common stock at $10.00 per share. Net
proceeds from the above transactions, after deducting offering expenses,
underwriting fees, and amounts retained to fund the Company's employee
stock ownership plan (ESOP), totaled approximately $7.4 million.
The Company is primarily engaged in the business of directing, planning
and coordinating the business activities of the Bank. These activities
primarily consist of accepting deposits from the general public and
investing these funds in loans in the Bank's market area and in investment
securities and mortgage-backed securities. In the future, the holding
company structure will permit the Company to expand the financial services
currently offered through the Bank although there are no definitive plans
or arrangements for such expansion at present.
Basis of Presentation
---------------------
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses
for the year. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change
in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with
foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans.
45
<PAGE>
Management believes that the allowances for losses on loans and real
estate acquired by foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans are adequate.
While management uses available information to provide for such
allowances, future additions to the allowances may be necessary based upon
changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies,
as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the
Company's allowances for losses. Such agencies may require the Company to
recognize additions to the allowances based upon their judgments about
information available to them at the time of their examination.
Prior to the acquisition of the Association on June 28, 1996, and the
Association's simultaneous conversion to the Bank, the Company had not
issued any stock, had no assets or liabilities, and had not engaged in any
business activities other than that of an organizational nature.
Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements included herein reflect
the operations of the Association only for periods prior to June 28, 1996.
Principles of Consolidation
---------------------------
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Heartland Bancshares, Inc., Heartland National Bank, and Herrin First
Service Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Heartland National Bank.
All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in
consolidation.
The subsidiary was formed in 1971 by the Association for the purpose of
developing a residential subdivision. Such development was completed and
all lots were subsequently sold. No further development activities have
been undertaken or are currently planned although the corporation, with
regulatory approval, recently purchased and subsequently sold one
residential real estate property.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
-------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents were $1,872,000, and $4,263,000 at December 31,
1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively. For purposes of reporting cash
flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts of cash due
from banks, and the Bank's Regulation D reserve. The Bank has a reserve
requirement pass thru deposit for its deposits at the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Chicago. This requirement was $20,000 for both 1996 and 1995.
Certificates of deposit with banks are shown separately from cash in the
financial statements.
Investment Securities
---------------------
The Company accounts for its security holdings in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" (SFAS No. 115). At
acquisition, SFAS No. 115 requires that securities be classified into one
of three categories: trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity.
Trading securities are bought and held principally with the intention of
selling them in the near term. The Company has no trading securities.
Investment securities that management has the ability and intent to hold
to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at cost,
adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discounts using the
level-yield method. Other marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized
gains and losses on trading securities are included in net income.
Unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are
recognized as direct increases or decreases in retained earnings, net of
tax. Cost of securities sold is recognized using the specific
identification method.
Securities available-for-sale are stated at fair value for December 31,
1996 and December 31, 1995. Fair value is based on market prices quoted in
financial publications or other independent sources. Subsequent to
adoption of SFAS No. 115, net unrealized gains or losses are excluded from
earnings and reported, net of deferred income taxes, as a separate
component of stockholders' equity until realized. The adjusted cost of the
specific security available- for-sale that is sold is used to compute any
gain or loss upon sale.
46
<PAGE>
Mortgage-Backed Securities
--------------------------
Mortgage-backed securities represent participating interests in pools of
long-term first mortgage loans originated and serviced by issuers of the
securities. Mortgage-backed securities classified as held-to-maturity are
carried at unpaid principal balances, adjusted for unamortized premiums
and unearned discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized using methods
approximating the level-yield method over the remaining period to
contractual maturity, adjusted for anticipated prepayments.
Mortgage-backed securities classified as available- for-sale are stated at
fair value at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995. Should any
securities be sold, cost of securities sold is determined using the
specific identification method.
Real Estate Owned
-----------------
Real estate properties acquired through loan foreclosure are recorded at
the lower of cost (outstanding principal balance of the related mortgage
loan at the date of foreclosure, adjusted for any escrow balance) or fair
value, less estimated selling expenses. Costs of holding real estate
acquired in settlement of loans are reflected in income currently.
Valuations are periodically performed by management and an allowance for
losses is established by a charge to operations if the carrying value of a
property exceeds its estimated fair value.
Property, Equipment and Related Depreciation
--------------------------------------------
Land is carried at cost. Properties and equipment are carried at cost,
less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of properties and equipment is
being determined by the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the related assets.
Loans Receivable
----------------
Loans receivable are stated at unpaid principal balances, less the
allowance for loan losses and net deferred loan origination fees and
discounts. Interest on loans is accrued and credited to operations based
upon the principal amount outstanding. Unearned discount on home
improvement loans is amortized over the estimated lives of the related
loans using various methods which approximate the effective interest
method.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 114 "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment
of a Loan" and SFAS No. 118 "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan -- Income Recognition and Disclosures," an amendment of SFAS No. 114,
effective January 1, 1995. These statements address the accounting by
creditors for impairment of certain loans. They apply to all creditors and
to all loans, uncollateralized as well as collateralized, except for large
groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively
evaluated for impairment, loans measured at fair value or at lower of cost
or fair value, leases, and debt securities. The Company considers all one-
to four-family residential mortgage loans, construction loans, and all
consumer loans (as presented in Note 4) to be smaller-balance homogeneous
loans. These statements apply to all loans that are restructured involving
a modification of terms. Loans within the scope of these statements are
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that all principal and interest will not be collected in
accordance with the contractual terms of the loans. Management determines
the impairment of loans based on knowledge of the borrower's ability to
repay the loan according to the contractual agreement and the borrower's
repayment history. Pursuant to SFAS No. 114, management does not consider
an insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall to impair a loan.
Management has determined that a delay less than 90 days will be
considered an insignificant delay and that an amount less than $15,000
will be considered an insignificant shortfall. The Company does not apply
SFAS No. 114 using major risk classifications, but applies SFAS No. 114 on
a loan by loan basis. Impaired loans are charged off when management
determines that principal and interest are not collectible. At December
31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had no loans that management considered
impaired. Impaired loans during the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995
were not material.
47
<PAGE>
Any excess of the Company's recorded investment for impairment in the
loans over the measured value of the loans is provided for in the
allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Company had
no recorded investment in loans meeting the definition of impaired as
defined in SFAS No. 114.
In addition to any loans considered impaired under the criteria outlined
above, the Company does have loans on nonaccrual status (as shown in Note
4) for which impairment has not been recognized. Management's policy is to
place a loan on nonaccrual status when it becomes delinquent for more than
90 days or when management believes that the collection of interest is
doubtful. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status regardless of their
inclusion in the group of smaller-balance homogeneous loans mentioned
above which are excluded from SFAS No. 114.
When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is
reversed. Interest income on loans on nonaccrual status is subsequently
recognized only to the extent cash payments are received, until such time
that in management's opinion, the borrower will be able to meet payments
as they become due.
Valuation Allowance for Loans and Real Estate Owned
---------------------------------------------------
The Company's allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in
management's judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in
the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management's
evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio, including the
nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss
experience, specific impaired loans, and economic conditions. The
Company's allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses which is
charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Changes
in the allowance relating to impaired loans are charged or credited to the
provision for loan losses.
Income Taxes
------------
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted
income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets
or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax
laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
Earnings per Share
------------------
Earnings per share are based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. In accordance with Statement of
Position 93-6, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans"
(SOP 93-6), only employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares that have
been committed to be released are considered outstanding shares. The
weighted average number of shares used for the year ended December 31,
1996 was 810,252. The Company completed its initial stock offering on June
28, 1996. Earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 1996 have
been computed based upon net income for the period from July 1, 1996 to
December 31, 1996. The effect on earnings per share for the period June
28, 1996 to June 30, 1996 is not considered significant.
As no common stock was outstanding during the year ended December 31,
1995, earnings per share information for that period is not applicable.
Dividends per Share
-------------------
In accordance with the provisions of SOP 93-6, dividends paid on
unallocated ESOP shares are not considered dividends for financial
reporting purposes.
48
<PAGE>
Impact of New Accounting Standards
----------------------------------
Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans. The Accounting Standards
Division of the AICPA approved Statement of Position 93-6 (SOP 93-6),
"Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans," which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1993. This
statement applies to shares of capital stock of sponsoring employers
acquired by employee stock ownership plans (ESOP) after December 31, 1992
that had not been committed to be released as of January 1, 1992. SOP 93-6
will, among other things, change the measure of compensation recorded by
employers from the cost of ESOP shares to the fair value of employee stock
ownership plan shares. To the extent that the fair value of the Company's
ESOP shares, committed to be released directly to compensate employees,
differs from the cost of such shares, compensation expenses and a related
charge or credit to additional paid-in capital will be reported in the
Company's consolidated financial statements.
During 1996, the Company adopted an employee stock ownership plan. The
Company is accounting for the plan according to the provisions of SOP
93-6.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation" was issued by the FASB in October, 1995. SFAS
No. 123 establishes a fair value-based method of accounting for stock
options and other equity instruments. It requires the use of that method
for transactions with other than employees and encourages its use for
transactions with employees. It permits entities to continue to use the
intrinsic value method included in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", but regardless of the
method used to account for the compensation cost associated with stock
option and similar plans, it requires employers to disclose information in
accordance with SFAS No. 123. The general principle underlying SFAS No.
123 is that equity instruments are recognized at the fair value of the
consideration received for them. If the fair value of the consideration
received cannot be reasonably determined, the fair value of the equity
instrument itself may be used. The fair value method of accounting for
stock options and other instruments applies this general principle
measuring compensation cost for employers as the excess of the fair value
of the equity instrument over the amount paid by the employee. The
definition of fair value in SFAS No. 123 is the same as that included in
SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of."
SFAS No. 123 requires significantly expanded disclosures, including
disclosure of the pro forma amount of net income (and earnings per share
for public entities) as if the fair value-based method were used to
account for stock-based compensation if the intrinsic value method of
APB-25 is retained.
The recognition requirements for transactions with other than employees
apply for transactions entered into after December 15, 1995. The
recognition alternative of the fair value-based method for transactions
with employees may be implemented immediately upon issuance of SFAS No.
123. The disclosure requirements, which apply regardless of the
recognition method chosen, are applicable for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995.
With the adoption in 1997 of stock-based compensation plans (See Note 11),
the Company intends to follow the SFAS No. 123 guidelines as appropriate.
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. In March, 1995, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets to Be Disposed Of." SFAS No. 121 establishes accounting standards
for the impairment of long-lived assets, certain identifiable intangibles,
and goodwill related to those assets to be held and used and for
long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be disposed of.
The statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If, under the criteria of the
statement, an asset is impaired, an impairment loss
49
<PAGE>
is recognized. SFAS No. 121 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 1995. The Company has adopted the provisions of the statement
effective for the year ending December 31, 1996. The adoption of SFAS No.
121 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
operating results.
Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights. In May, 1995, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights." SFAS No. 122
requires that a mortgage banking enterprise recognize as separate assets
rights to service mortgage loans for others however those servicing rights
are acquired. A mortgage banking enterprise that acquires mortgage
servicing rights through either the purchase or origination of mortgage
loans and sells or securitizes those loans with servicing rights retained
should allocate the total cost of the mortgage loans to the mortgage
servicing rights and the loans (without mortgage servicing rights) based
on their relative fair values if it is practicable to estimate those fair
values. If it is not practicable to estimate the fair values of the
mortgage servicing rights and the mortgage loans (without the servicing
rights), the entire cost of purchasing or originating the loans should be
allocated to the mortgage loans and no cost should be allocated to the
mortgage servicing rights. SFAS No. 122 also requires that a mortgage
banking enterprise assess its capitalized mortgage servicing rights for
impairment based on the fair value of those rights. SFAS No. 122 must be
applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1995,
with earlier adoption encouraged, to transactions in which a mortgage
banking enterprise sells or securitizes mortgage loans with servicing
rights retained and to impairment evaluations of all amounts capitalized
as mortgage servicing rights, including those purchased before the
adoption of SFAS No. 122. Retroactive capitalization of mortgage servicing
rights retained in transactions in which a mortgage banking enterprise
originates mortgage loans and sells or securitizes those loans before the
adoption of SFAS No. 122 is prohibited. The Company has adopted the
provision of the statement for the year ending December 31, 1996. The
adoption of SFAS No. 122 did not have a material effect on the Company's
financial position or operating results.
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets. In June, 1996,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS No. 125
establishes accounting and reporting standards for transfers and servicing
of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities based on the
consistent application of the financial components approach. This approach
requires the recognition of financial assets and servicing assets that are
controlled by the reporting entity, the derecognition of financial assets
when control is surrendered, and the derecognition of liabilities when
they are extinguished. Specific criteria are established for determining
when control has been surrendered in the transfer of financial assets.
SFAS No. 125 is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets
and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996.
Subsequent to the issuance of SFAS No. 125, the FASB issued SFAS No. 127,
"Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of FASB Statement
No. 125." This statement defers for one year the effective date of SFAS
No. 125 as applies to secured borrowings and collateral and certain other
transactions. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 125, as
amended by SFAS No. 127, in 1997 and subsequent years as appropriate. The
management of the Company does not currently believe that the future
adoption of this statement will have a material effect on the Company's
financial position or operating results.
Reclassifications
-----------------
Certain reclassifications have been made for 1995 to conform with the 1996
financial statement presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on
previously reported net income or retained earnings.
50
<PAGE>
2. Investment Securities
---------------------
Securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale consist of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
Held-to-Maturity:
December 31, 1996
-----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U. S. government and
federal agencies $ 8,085 $ 37 $ 29 $ 8,093
Municipal securities * 945 - - 945
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 9,030 $ 37 $ 29 $ 9,038
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
*Local issues with no actively traded markets to establish fair market
value different from amortized cost.
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995
-----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U. S. government and
federal agencies $ 8,640 $ 41 $ 30 $ 8,651
Municipal securities * 480 - - 480
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 9,120 $ 41 $ 30 $ 9,131
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
*Local issues with no actively traded markets to establish fair market
value different from amortized cost.
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
Available-for-Sale:
December 31, 1996
-----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U. S. government and
federal agencies $ 2,087 $ 21 $ - $ 2,108
Municipal securities - - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 2,087 $ 21 $ - $ 2,108
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995
-----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U. S. government and
federal agencies $ 100 $ 2 $ - $ 102
Municipal securities - - - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 100 $ 2 $ - $ 102
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
51
<PAGE>
The amortized cost and estimated market value of debt securities at
December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, by contractual maturity, are
shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without
call or prepayment penalties.
Amounts maturing in:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Securities Securities
Held-to-Maturity Available-for-Sale
----------------------- -----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Amortized Market Amortized Market
Cost Value Cost Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(1,000's)
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1996
-----------------
One year or less $ 2,410 $ 2,414 $ 100 $ 100
After one year through
five years 6,300 6,304 1,737 1,756
After five years through
ten years 260 260 250 252
After ten years 60 60 - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 9,030 $ 9,038 $ 2,087 $ 2,108
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Securities Securities
Held-to-Maturity Available-for-Sale
------------------------ -----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Amortized Market Amortized Market
Cost Value Cost Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(1,000's)
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1995
-----------------
One year or less $ 4,526 $ 4,529 $ - $ -
After one year through
five years 4,234 4,242 100 102
After five years through
ten years 245 245 - -
After ten years 115 115 - -
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 9,120 $ 9,131 $ 100 $ 102
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
No securities were pledged at December 31, 1996 or December 31, 1995 to
secure deposits in excess of $100,000.
During 1995, the Association's subsidiary sold a U. S. Treasury note for
total proceeds of $50,000 resulting in gross realized gains of $551. Also
during 1995, the Association's service corporation transferred the single
remaining $100,000 U. S. Treasury note to available-for-sale as a result of
this sale. This security is currently shown at market value as required by
SFAS No. 115. The security had an amortized cost of approximately $100,000
with an unrealized gain of approximately $1,400 at transfer. This
unrealized gain, net of deferred tax effect, is included in the $244,000
change in net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities
contained in the statement of stockholders' equity for 1995.
52
<PAGE>
3. Mortgage-Backed and Related Securities
--------------------------------------
Mortgage-backed and related securities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Held-to-Maturity -
December 31, 1996
-----------------
FNMA $ 2,697 $ 10 $ 39 $ 2,668
GNMA 1,030 6 25 1,011
FHLMC 2,936 3 90 2,849
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 6,663 $ 19 $ 154 $ 6,528
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1995
-----------------
FNMA $ 1,437 $ 34 $ 11 $ 1,460
GNMA 1,147 15 2 1,160
FHLMC 544 16 - 560
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 3,128 $ 65 $ 13 $ 3,180
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Available-for-Sale -
December 31, 1996
-----------------
FNMA $ 552 $ - $ 13 $ 539
GNMA 1,192 5 3 1,194
FHLMC 1,116 - 35 1,081
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 2,860 $ 5 $ 51 $ 2,814
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross Estimated
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1995
-----------------
Collateralized mortgage
obligations - FNMA $ 3,984 $ 36 $ - $ 4,020
Collateralized mortgage
obligations - Private 32 2 - 34
FNMA 708 - 1 707
GNMA 1,370 3 2 1,371
FHLMC 1,215 - 12 1,203
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 7,309 $ 41 $ 15 $ 7,335
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The above securities, other than those indicated as private, are issued,
guaranteed or collateralized by one of the following: the Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA), the Federal National Mortgage
Association (FNMA) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).
53
<PAGE>
A summary of maturities of mortgage-backed and related securities
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale as of December 31, 1996 is shown
below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Securities Securities
Held-to-Maturity Available-for-Sale
----------------------- -----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Amortized Market Amortized Market
Cost Value Cost Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(1,000's)
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage-backed securities:
In one year or less $ - $ - $ - $ -
After one year through
five years 2,444 2,369 1,668 1,620
After five years through
ten years 1,459 1,442 - -
After ten years 2,760 2,717 1,192 1,194
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 6,663 $ 6,528 $ 2,860 $ 2,814
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
A summary of maturities of mortgage-backed and related securities
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale as of December 31, 1995 is shown
below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Securities Securities
Held-to-Maturity Available-for-Sale
----------------------- -----------------------
Estimated Estimated
Amortized Market Amortized Market
Cost Value Cost Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(1,000's)
---------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mortgage-backed securities:
In one year or less $ - $ - $ - $ -
After one year through
five years - - 1,923 1,910
After five years through
ten years - - 1,011 1,025
After ten years 3,128 3,180 4,375 4,400
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $ 3,128 $ 3,180 $ 7,309 $ 7,335
----- ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
On December 15, 1995, the Association transferred mortgage-backed and
related securities previously classified as held-to-maturity to
available-for-sale. The amortized cost of these securities was $4,016,000
resulting in a gross unrealized gain of $79,000 at December 31, 1995. The
unrealized gain, net of deferred tax effect, is included in the $244,000
change in net unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale securities
contained in the statement of stockholders' equity for 1995. This transfer
occurred during the period authorized by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board's implementation guidance on SFAS No. 115 "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." The Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency concurred with the guidance's intent to allow
financial institutions to move securities from the held-to-maturity to the
available-for-sale category without calling into question an institution's
intent to hold other securities to maturity. The period that this transfer
could occur was from November 15, 1995 to December 31, 1995.
These securities were collateralized mortgage obligations and were
regularly subjected to a nationally recognized securities test in order to
determine their acceptability as investments of the Association.
These securities were sold during 1996 for total proceeds of $4,025,000,
resulting in gross realized gains of $13,000 and gross realized losses of
$3,000. No mortgage-backed and related securities were sold during 1995.
54
<PAGE>
4. Loans Receivable, Net
---------------------
A comparative summary of loans receivable follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Type of Loan:
------------
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family residential $ 33,208 $ 29,890
Multi-family residential 1,520 1,257
Construction 1,010 1,404
Church 1,875 1,705
Commercial 2,633 766
-------- --------
Total Real Estate Loans $ 40,246 $ 35,022
----------------------- -------- --------
Consumer loans: (Net of unearned
discount of $19,000 at December 31,
1996 and $41,000 at December 31, 1995)
Automobiles $ 346 $ 236
Savings account 503 524
Home improvement 490 249
Other 545 329
-------- --------
Total Consumer Loans $ 1,884 $ 1,338
-------------------- -------- --------
Total Gross Loans $ 42,130 $ 36,360
----------------- -------- --------
Less:
Loans in process $ 267 $ 873
Deferred service charge 97 127
Allowance for loan losses 300 300
-------- --------
Total $ 41,466 $ 35,060
----- ======== ========
</TABLE>
Nonaccrual loans totaled $493,000 and $570,000 at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively. Gross interest income of approximately $16,000 and
$20,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively,
would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans if interest income had been
recognized throughout the periods. None of this income was actually
recognized on the cash basis during these periods.
5. Investments Required by Law
---------------------------
Investments required by law consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Federal Home Loan Bank stock $ 366 $ 342
Federal Reserve Bank stock 123 -
-------- --------
Total $ 489 $ 342
----- ======== ========
</TABLE>
The above investments are valued at cost, which represents redemption
value and approximates fair value.
55
<PAGE>
6. Allowance For Losses
--------------------
A summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years
ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period $ 300 $ 100
Write offs (5) -
Recoveries - -
Provision 5 200
-------- --------
Balance at end of period $ 300 $ 300
======== ========
</TABLE>
7. Accrued Interest Receivable
---------------------------
Accrued interest receivable is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Investment securities $ 158 $ 116
Mortgage-backed securities 50 55
Accrued dividends - FHLB stock 7 6
Loans 101 56
-------- --------
Total $ 316 $ 233
----- ======== ========
</TABLE>
8. Property, Equipment and Property Held for Investment
----------------------------------------------------
Property, equipment and property held for investment are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land and land improvements $ 164 $ 158
Office buildings and improvements 279 251
Furniture and equipment 321 283
Rental property and real estate held
for development 79 197
-------- --------
$ 843 $ 889
Less - Accumulated depreciation 364 317
---- -------- --------
Total $ 479 $ 572
----- ======== ========
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 was
$47,000 and $47,000, respectively.
56
<PAGE>
9. Deposits
--------
Deposit accounts and interest rates at December 31, 1996 and 1995 were as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
-------------------------- ---------------------------
Percent Percent
Interest of Interest of
Rate Amount Accounts Rate Amount Accounts
-------- ------ -------- -------- ------ --------
(1,000's)
--------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Noninterest-bearing
accounts N/A $ 248 0.47% N/A $ - 0.00%
------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
NOW accounts 3.04% $ 8,912 16.87% 3.05% $ 9,169 16.48%
------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Passbook 3.84% $ 6,649 12.58% 3.85% $ 6,418 11.54%
------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Christmas Club 4.08% $ 10 0.02% 4.08% $ 11 0.02%
------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
Certificates of Deposit
91 day 4.60%-4.73% $ 549 1.04% 4.83%-4.88% $ 716 1.29%
6 month 4.98%-5.19% 4,361 8.25% 5.32%-5.48% 5,120 9.20%
12 month 5.28%-5.48% 7,204 13.63% 5.90%-6.19% 7,244 13.02%
18 month 6.17%-6.32% 3,856 7.30% 6.36%-6.41% 3,636 6.54%
700 day 6.93% 811 1.54% 6.92% 980 1.76%
30 month 5.80%-5.85% 6,000 11.36% 4.99%-5.22% 6,755 12.14%
3 year 5.62%-7.04% 2,917 5.52% 5.10%-7.11% 3,665 6.58%
4 year 6.11%-6.45% 1,092 2.07% 6.18%-6.38% 1,150 2.07%
5 year 6.09%-6.16% 2,969 5.62% 6.17%-6.19% 3,304 5.94%
6 year 6.17%-6.37% 1,174 2.22% 6.51%-6.59% 1,266 2.28%
8 year 6.52%-6.83% 1,326 2.51% 6.55%-6.94% 1,558 2.80%
Jumbo 7.08% 323 0.61% - % - -%
---------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- ------
$32,582 61.67% $35,394 63.62%
------- ------ ------- ------
Individual retirement
accounts 6.09%-6.73% $ 4,431 8.39% 5.87%-6.69% $ 4,640 8.34%
---------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- ------
Total $52,832 100.00% $55,632 100.00%
----- ======= ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
The following schedule sets forth the amount and maturities of time
deposits at December 31, 1996 and 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Maturing in - Less than one year $23,071 $20,441
- From one to two years 8,492 10,833
- From two to three years 2,977 5,700
- From three to four years 347 1,188
- From four to five years 1,245 170
- Over five years 881 1,702
------- -------
Total $37,013 $40,034
----- ======= =======
</TABLE>
The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of
$100,000 was approximately $4,496,000 at December 31, 1996 and $4,868,000
at December 31, 1995.
The Bank did not have brokered deposits at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Deposits in excess of $100,000 are not federally insured.
Deposits by officers, directors, and employees were $1,765,000 at December
31, 1996 and $778,000 at December 31, 1995.
57
<PAGE>
Interest expense on deposits for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Interest on passbooks $ 252 $ 252
Interest on NOW accounts 267 265
Interest on time deposits 2,220 2,130
Early withdrawal penalties (20) (18)
-------- --------
Total $ 2,719 $ 2,629
----- ======== ========
</TABLE>
10. Income Taxes
------------
The Company and its subsidiary file consolidated federal income tax
returns on a calendar year basis.
Prior to the Association's decision to convert to a stock institution and
national bank, the Association computed its income taxes allowing for the
effect of the special bad debt deduction available to a savings and loan
association under the Internal Revenue Code if certain conditions are met.
In general, this special tax bad debt deduction represents the greater of
amounts deducted based upon historical loss experience or 8% of taxable
income. Based upon the Association's decision to convert to bank status,
the law in effect at that time required that the entire amount of excess
bad debt deductions referred to above would be restored to income, and
taxes thereon would become due. As a result, income taxes totaling
$450,000 were accrued in the Association's 1995 financial statements as a
component of income tax expense. This accrual recognized a deferred
liability for the tax effect of bad debt reserves not previously recorded
(those arising before 1988).
During the third quarter of 1996, the Small Business Job Protection Act of
1996 (Small Business Act) was enacted into law. Under this law, for years
beginning after 1995, thrift institutions (such as the Association) are
required to recapture "excess bad debt reserves" over a six-year period.
However, pre-1988 reserves are not included in these excess bad debt
reserves. As the conversion of the Association to the Bank had not taken
place as of December 31, 1995 (the effective date of the new law), the
Bank was still a thrift institution as of that date. Therefore, it is the
current judgment of management that due to the change enacted by the Small
Business Act, the pre-1988 reserves will not be required to be recaptured
into taxable income. As a result in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes", the $450,000 increase in income taxes made during 1995 is
being reversed during the current period as a change to income from
continuing operations, leading to a $450,000 decrease in income tax
expense and deferred income taxes as of December 31, 1996.
Income tax expense is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Current Tax Expense (Benefit)
-----------------------------
Federal $ 44 $ 96
State (20) (14)
-------- --------
Total Current $ 24 $ 82
------------- -------- --------
Deferred Tax Expense (Benefit)
------------------------------
Federal $ (388) $ 337
State (88) 76
-------- --------
Total Deferred $ (476) $ 413
-------------- -------- --------
Total Expense (Benefit) $ (452) $ 495
----------------------- ======== ========
</TABLE>
58
<PAGE>
A reconciliation of income taxes at the federal statutory rates to the
income tax expense in the financial statements is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Income tax at statutory rates $ 26 $ 68
State income tax - Current year (25) (21)
Recapture of tax bad debt reserves - Federal - 367
- State - 83
Reversal of bad debt recapture due to
new law (450) -
Other (3) (2)
-------- --------
Income tax expense (benefit) $ (452) $ 495
======== ========
Effective tax rates (587.01)% 250.00%
======== ========
</TABLE>
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 set the statutory rate at 34% effective July 1,
1987. For the periods presented, deferred tax expense results from timing
differences in the recognition of income and expense for tax and financial
reporting purposes.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the deferred
tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 1996 and 1995 are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for unrealized losses on
securities available-for-sale $ 10 $ -
Allowance for loan losses 116 116
Deferred loan fees 23 28
Benefits not currently deductible 23 -
Other 5 5
------- --------
Total Deferred Tax Assets $ 177 $ 149
------------------------- ------- --------
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax liabilities:
Federal Home Loan Bank
stock dividends $ 18 $ 18
Allowance for unrealized gains
on securities available-for-sale - 11
Tax basis bad debt reserve 64 76
Difference between book and tax
depreciation 31 26
Recapture of tax basis bad debt reserves - 450
------- --------
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities $ 113 $ 581
------------------------------ ------- --------
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability) $ 64 $ (432)
---------------------------------- ======= ========
</TABLE>
No valuation allowance was required for deferred tax assets at December
31, 1996 and 1995.
Taxes relating to gains on security sales were approximately $4,000 and
$200 for the years ending December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
59
<PAGE>
11. Pension Plan, Benefit Plans and Agreements
------------------------------------------
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund
--------------------------------------
The Bank participates in an industry-wide tax-qualified pension trust
administered by the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund. As of June 30,
1996, the plan (through all of its participating employers) covers 17,215
employee-members and 17,379 retirees and beneficiaries. An employee will
be eligible for membership in the Comprehensive Retirement Program on the
first day of the month following the employee's first year of service and
attainment of age 21. A member will be considered active or inactive
depending on whether or not he or she completes 1,000 hours of service
each calendar year.
For the plan year beginning July 1, 1996 the full funding limitation will
continue to be applied on an employer-by-employer basis. Each employer in
an overfunded position will use its excess designated "Future Employer
Contribution Offset" (FECO), to absorb future contribution requirements.
Employers who are in an unfunded position are billed by the Fund for their
required contributions.
The actuarial cost method used to value all benefits except pre-retirement
death and disability benefits is the projected unit credit cost method.
For the pre-retirement death and disability benefits, a one year term cost
method is used to determine the employer contribution. In the actuarial
valuation, assumptions are made as to future compensation levels,
mortality, turnover, etc. Unfunded accrued liabilities and actuarial
experience gains and losses are amortized over various periods prescribed
by law. Actuarial gains and losses are spread as a part of the valuation
method. The market value of the net assets of the Retirement Fund exceeds
the liabilities for the present value of accrued benefits.
Separate actuarial valuations are not made with respect to each employer,
nor are the plan assets so segregated. The Bank's (formerly the
Association's) prior service costs have been funded and are being
amortized over a ten-year period. Current funding costs are charged to
operations. Total pension expense for the years ended December 31, 1996
and 1995 was $ - 0 - for both years.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
-----------------------------
The Company has established a tax qualified employee stock ownership plan
(ESOP) for employees of the Company and its subsidiary. Employees who have
attained age 21 and completed one year of service are eligible to
participate in the plan. On June 28, 1996, the Company loaned the ESOP
$701,500 to finance the plan's initial purchase of 70,150 shares. The loan
is due and payable in ten (10) annual payments of principal and interest
beginning December 31, 1996. The principal is to be repaid in equal
installments with interest at a variable rate of 1% above prime. The
Company intends to contribute sufficient funds to the ESOP to enable it to
repay the loan plus such other amounts as the Company's Board of Directors
may determine in its discretion. The Company accounts for its ESOP in
accordance with Statement of Position 93-6, "Employers' Accounting for
Employee Stock Ownership Plans." As shares are committed to be released to
participants, the Company reports employee benefits expense based on the
average market price of the shares during the period. ESOP benefits
expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 1996 was $98,557.
Director Retirement Plan
------------------------
In connection with the stock conversion of the Association to the Bank,
the Board of Directors of the Association (now the Bank) has adopted a
director retirement plan, effective December 31, 1995, for its directors
who are members of the Board of Directors at some time on or after the
plan's effective date. Under the plan, a bookkeeping account in each
participant's name is credited with "Performance Units" according to the
following formula: (i) 70 Performance Units for each full year of service
as a director prior to 1996 plus (ii) 100 Performance Units for each full
year of service as a director after 1995 with
60
<PAGE>
the value of each Performance Unit equal to the average fair market value
of one share of the Company's common stock as of December 31st of each of
the three years preceding the determination date (or such shorter period
as to which trading information is available). Additional Performance
Units are to be credited at the end of each year after 1995 based upon the
amount of dividends paid on the Company's common stock. A participant's
vested interest in Performance Units credited on the plan's effective date
equals 50% if the participant serves on the Board for less than a year
after 1995, 75% after the second year, and 100% after the third year. In
the event a participant's service on the Board is terminated due to death
or disability, the vested percentage becomes 100% regardless of the number
of years of service. Performance Units credited after the plan's effective
date are fully vested at all times.
As Company stock was outstanding during the last half of 1996, a liability
of $43,919 (and related expense) has been recognized in the financial
statements as of December 31, 1996 based on the vested value of the
interests in the director retirement plan as of that date.
Management Recognition Plan
---------------------------
On January 28, 1997, the stockholders of the Company approved a management
recognition plan (MRP). With funds to be contributed by the Company, the
MRP intends to purchase, in the aggregate, 35,075 shares of the Company's
common stock (the maximum number of shares allowed to be purchased). Such
shares may be purchased in the open market or in the form of shares newly
issued by the Company. At the effective date of the plan, certain
executive officers and directors of the Company and the Bank will receive
an award of common stock under the MRP up to a potential total of 26,301
shares. Common stock granted under the MRP vests over a five year period
at twenty percent per year. Under current accounting standards, when MRP
awards are granted, the Company will recognize compensation expense based
on the fair market value of the common stock on the date the awards are
granted with such amount being amortized over the expected vesting period
for the award.
Stock Option and Incentive Plan
-------------------------------
Also on January 28, 1997, the stockholders of the Company approved a stock
option and incentive plan. The option plan provides for the granting of
stock options and stock appreciation rights to certain employees and
directors of the Company and the Bank and has a term of ten years from the
effective date of the plan after which no awards may be granted. The plan
intends to reserve 87,687 authorized, but unissued shares (or treasury
shares), of common stock for issuance upon the future exercise of options
or stock appreciation rights. At the effective date of the plan, certain
executive officers and directors of the Company and the Bank will receive
a grant of an option under the plan to purchase up to 87,683 shares of
common stock at an exercise price per share equal to its fair market value
on that date. The plan provides for one-fifth of the options granted to be
exercisable on each of the first five anniversaries of the date the option
was granted.
As neither the management recognition plan nor the stock option and
incentive plan was in effect during 1996, no financial effect of these
plans is reflected on the accompanying financial statements.
Employment Agreements
---------------------
The Company and the Bank have entered into separate employment agreements
with certain officers of the Company and the Bank. These agreements
provide for salary terms, potential severance benefits, and potential
benefits which could be due to these officers in the event of a change in
control of the Company.
61
<PAGE>
12. Regulatory Capital
------------------
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum
capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory (and possibly
additional discretionary) actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Company's consolidated financial
statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators
about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the
table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations)
to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined)
to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31,
1996, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is
subject.
As of December 31, 1996, management believes that the Bank would be
categorized as "well-capitalized" under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, banks
must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1
leverage ratios of 10%, 6%, and 5%, respectively.
The Bank's actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of December
31, 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Actual Required
---------------- ---------------
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
------ ----- ------ -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total capital
(to risk-weighted assets): $9,460 29.44% $2,570 8.00%
Tier 1 capital
(to risk-weighted assets): 9,382 29.20% 1,285 4.00%
Tier 1 capital
(to average assets): 9,382 14.71% 1,913 3.00%
</TABLE>
The Bank is subject to the dividend restrictions set forth by the Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency. Under such restrictions, the Bank may
not, without the prior approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, declare dividends in excess of the sum of the current year's
earnings plus the retained earnings from the prior two years.
On September 30, 1996, a bill was signed into law which requires financial
institutions which are members of the Savings Association Insurance Fund
(SAIF) to pay a special one-time assessment on insured deposits.
Subsequent to that date, the Bank was informed that the amount of the
special assessment to be paid by the Bank was approximately $351,000. This
payment has been recorded on the financial statements as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1996 as a charge to expense.
62
<PAGE>
13. Other Noninterest Income and Expense
------------------------------------
Other noninterest income and expense amounts are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Other Noninterest Income
------------------------
Service charges $ 127 $ 113
Rental income 1 10
Other 7 12
------- -------
Total $ 135 $ 135
----- ======= =======
Other Noninterest Expense
-------------------------
Audit and accounting service $ 45 $ 25
Consultation fees - 5
Contributions 6 1
Dues 7 6
General assessment 23 20
Insurance and surety bond 20 19
Payroll taxes 36 33
Real estate owned expense 14 5
Other 99 40
------- -------
Total $ 250 $ 154
----- ======= =======
</TABLE>
14. Related Party Transactions
--------------------------
Officers and directors of the Company and the Bank, and individuals
related to such individuals, incurred indebtedness in the form of loans as
customers. These loans were made on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time
for comparable transactions with other customers and did not involve more
than the normal risk of collectibility. The balance of these loans at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, totaled approximately $542,000 and $432,000,
respectively.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
-----------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
-----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1 $ 432 $ 156
New Loans 428 289
Payments (318) (13)
-------- -------
Balance at December 31 $ 542 $ 432
======== =======
</TABLE>
The Association's subsidiary purchased the former residence of the
Association's current president during July, 1995 for $118,000. This
transaction was approved by both the Office of Thrift Supervision and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The property was sold in May, 1996
for gross proceeds of $112,000.
During the period January to November, 1995, the Company's current
president rented property held by the Association for rent. The rent paid
to the Association by the president was $550 per month.
The above two transactions were made on substantially the same terms and
conditions as those for comparable third-party transactions.
63
<PAGE>
15. Deferred Compensation
---------------------
The Company has an agreement with certain directors to invest a part of
current directors fees. These fees are held in Company accounts at the
Bank's highest certificate rate until the permanent disability,
resignation, or removal from office of the director, at which time the
fees are payable in either a lump sum or on a monthly installment basis as
directed by an election made by the director.
The total liability is $61,000 and $68,000 for the years ended December
31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. A $10,000 payment was made from the
accounts during 1996. Deferred compensation contributions charged to
income for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 were $ - 0 - for
both years.
16. Commitments and Contingencies
-----------------------------
The Bank is, in the normal course of business, a party to certain
off-balance-sheet financial instruments with inherent credit risk. These
instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit, are used by the Bank to meet the financing needs of its
customers. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, credit risk in
excess of the amount recognized in the Company's statements of financial
condition.
Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk for which the
contract amounts represent potential risk were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------------------------
1996 1995
---- ----
(1,000's)
----------------------------------------
Interest Interest
Amount Rate Amount Rate
------ -------- ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Commitments to extend credit - Fixed $349 8.00%-8.75% $393 7.95%-8.50%
- Variable 579 7.13% 312 6.75%-6.95%
--- ---
Total $928 $705
----- === ===
</TABLE>
The Company's maximum exposure to credit loss under commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit is the equivalent of the contractual
amount of those instruments. The same credit policies are used by the
Company in granting commitments and conditional obligations as are used in
the extension of credit.
The commitments noted above consist of loans approved by the Bank with the
funds not yet being disbursed. Commitments to extend credit are legally
binding agreements to lend to a borrower as long as the borrower performs
in accordance with the terms of the contract. Commitments generally have
fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. As a portion of the
commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment
amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Standby letters of credit are commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee
the specific performance of a customer to a third party. At December 31,
1996 and 1995, the Bank had no such commitments outstanding.
Collateral may be required by both commitments and standby letters of
credit in accordance with the normal credit evaluation process based upon
the creditworthiness of the customer and the credit risk associated with
the particular transaction. Collateral held varies but may include
residential and commercial real estate, accounts receivable, inventory and
equipment.
The Company is involved in various litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. In the opinion of management, at the present time,
disposition of the suits and claims will not have a material effect on the
financial position of the Company.
64
<PAGE>
17. Significant Group Concentration of Credit Risk
----------------------------------------------
Most of the Bank's business activity is with customers located within
Williamson, Jackson, and Franklin counties in Illinois. At December 31,
1996 and 1995, the Bank was considered to have a significant concentration
of credit risk for loans made to various local churches. Loans made to
various churches total $1,875,000 and $1,705,000 at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively. This comprises 4% of the total loan portfolio and 15%
of tangible capital at December 31, 1996.
18. Liquidation Account
-------------------
At the time of conversion from the Association, the Bank established a
liquidation account for the benefit of eligible savings account holders
who continue to maintain their savings accounts with the Bank after
conversion. In the event of a complete liquidation of the Bank (and only
in such event), eligible savings account holders who continue to maintain
their accounts with the Bank shall be entitled to receive a distribution
from the liquidation account after payment to all creditors but before any
liquidation distribution with respect to common stock. The initial
liquidation account will be proportionately reduced for any subsequent
reduction in the eligible holder's deposit accounts. The creation and
maintenance of the liquidation account will not restrict the use or
application of any of the capital accounts of the Company, except that the
Company may not declare or pay a cash dividend on, or repurchase any of,
its capital stock if the effect of such dividend or repurchase would be to
cause the Company's net worth to be reduced below the aggregate amount
then required for the liquidation account or the amount required by
federal or state law.
19. Subsequent Events
-----------------
In January, 1997, the Bank borrowed $1,500,000 from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Chicago at interest rates ranging from 5.69% to 5.77%. All of
these borrowings are due and payable within six months of the borrowing
date.
On January 23, 1997, the Bank sold a section of foreclosed real estate
property for $84,000. This property was being carried on the Bank's
records at a value of $91,000.
As discussed in Note 11, the Company adopted a management recognition plan
and a stock option and incentive plan in 1997.
20. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
-----------------------------------
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in
estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein:
Cash and cash equivalents and certificates of deposit - The carrying
amount of cash and short-term instruments approximate their fair value.
Securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale - Fair
values for investment securities, excluding restricted equity securities,
are based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of restricted
equity securities approximate fair values.
Loans receivable and loan commitments - For variable-rate loans that
reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair
values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage
loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential), other consumer loans,
commercial real estate and commercial loans are estimated using discounted
cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans
with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for
impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or
underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Investments required by law - Stock in Federal Home Loan Bank and stock in
Federal Reserve Bank are valued at cost which represents redemption value
and approximates fair value.
65
<PAGE>
Deposit liability - The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by
definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate,
fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate
their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on
certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on
time deposits.
Accrued interest - The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate
their fair values.
The Company, in accordance with SFAS No. 107, has estimated fair values of
the financial instruments as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1996 1995
---------------- ----------------
(1,000's) (1,000's)
---------------- ----------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
-------- ----- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,872 $ 1,872 $ 4,263 $ 4,263
Certificates of deposit 293 293 981 981
Investment securities and mortgage-
backed and related securities 20,615 20,488 19,685 19,748
Loans 41,766 42,140 35,360 36,645
Allowance for loan losses (300) - (300) -
------- ------- ------- -------
Loans, net of allowance 41,466 42,140 35,060 36,645
Investments required by law 489 489 342 342
Accrued interest receivable 316 316 233 233
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits 52,832 52,994 55,632 55,783
Accrued interest on deposits 49 49 66 66
Loan Commitments 928 939 705 707
</TABLE>
21. Parent Company Financial Information
------------------------------------
The following are a condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 1996 and a
condensed statement of income and cash flows for the period ended December
31, 1996 for Heartland Bancshares, Inc. (parent company only):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Condensed Balance Sheet
-----------------------
(In Thousands) 1996
------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Assets:
Cash $ 447
Investment securities and mortgage-
backed securities 2,745
Investment in subsidiary 4,479
Other assets 108
-------
Total Assets $ 7,779
=======
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Other liabilities $ 12
Stockholders' equity 7,767
-------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 7,779
=======
</TABLE>
66
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Condensed Statement of Income
-----------------------------
(In Thousands) 1996
-------
<S> <C>
Interest income $ 74
Interest expense -
-------
$ 74
Operating expenses 90
-------
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity
in undistributed earnings of subsidiary $ (16)
Income tax expense (benefit) (1)
-------
Income (loss) before equity in undistributed
earnings of subsidiary $ (15)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary 380
-------
Net Income $ 365
=======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
---------------------------------
(In Thousands) 1996
------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Operating activities:
Net income $ 365
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary (380)
Other, net (19)
-------
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities $ (34)
-------
Investing activities:
Capital contributions to subsidiary $(4,074)
Increase in investment securities (2,730)
-------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities $(6,804)
-------
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of stock $ 7,446
Dividends paid (161)
-------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities $ 7,285
-------
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 447
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year -
-------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 447
=======
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Disclosure
--------------------
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons;
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
-------------------------------------------------
For information concerning the Board of Directors of the Company, the
information contained under the section captioned "Proposal I -- Election of
Directors" in the Company's definitive proxy statement for the Company's 1997
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Proxy Statement") is incorporated herein by
reference.
Information regarding executive officers of the Company is incorporated
by reference to the section captioned "Proposal I -- Election of Directors --
Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors" in the Proxy Statement.
Item 10. Executive Compensation
- -------------------------------
The information contained under the section captioned "Proposal I --
Election of Directors -- Executive Compensation and Other Benefits" in the Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section captioned in "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy
Statement.
(b) Security Ownership of Management
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections captioned "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Proposal I --
Election of Directors" in the Proxy Statement.
(c) Changes in Control
Management of the Company knows of no arrangements, including
any pledge by any person of securities of the Company, the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change
in control of the registrant.
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
- -------------------------------------------------------
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section captioned "Proposal I -- Election of Directors --
Transactions with Management" in the Proxy Statement.
68
<PAGE>
PART IV
Item 13. Exhibits, List and Reports on Form 8-K
- -----------------------------------------------
(a) Exhibits. The exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-B are either
--------
filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB or incorporated herein by
reference. The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB and is also the Exhibit Index.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
No. Exhibits
-- --------
<S> <C>
* 3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
* 3.2 Bylaws of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
+* 10.1 Heartland Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan
+* 10.2 Heartland Bancshares, Inc. Management Recognition Plan
+* 10.3(a) Employment Agreements by and between Heartland National
Bank and Roger O. Hileman, Christy L. Cripps and
Ronald D. Maddox
+* 10.3(b) Employment Agreements by and between Heartland Bancshares,
Inc. and Roger O. Hileman, Christy L. Cripps and
Ronald D. Maddox
+* 10.4 First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Herrin
Retirement Plan for Directors
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23 Consent of Gray Hunter Stenn, CPAs
27 Financial Data Schedule
</TABLE>
- ---------------
* Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 (File No. 333-798)
+ Management contract or compensatory plan.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. No Reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company
-------------------
during the last quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
69
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
March 26, 1997 By: /s/ Roger O. Hileman
--------------------
Roger O. Hileman
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Roger O. Hileman March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
Roger O. Hileman
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
By: /s/ James C. Walker March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
James C. Walker
Chairman of the Board
By: /s/ Paul R. Calcaterra March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Calcaterra
Director
By: /s/ B. D. Cross March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
B. D. Cross
Director
By: /s/ Charles Stevens March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
Charles Stevens
Director
By: /s/ Randall A. Youngblood March 26, 1997
-------------------------------------------------------
Randall A. Youngblood
Director
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
Parent
- ------
Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage State of
Subsidiaries (1) Owned Incorporation
- ---------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Heartland National Bank 100% United States
Subsidiaries of Heartland National Bank
- ---------------------------------------
Herrin First Service Corporation 100% Illinois
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23
March 27, 1997
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
-----------------------------
The Board of Directors
Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of Heartland Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 1997
relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Heartland
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 1996, included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.
/s/ Gray Hunter Stenn
Gray Hunter Stenn
Certified Public Accountants
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 1,214
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS> 951
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD> 0
<TRADING-ASSETS> 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE> 4,922
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING> 15,693
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET> 15,566
<LOANS> 41,766
<ALLOWANCE> (300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 65,856
<DEPOSITS> 52,832
<SHORT-TERM> 0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER> 408
<LONG-TERM> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 9
<OTHER-SE> 12,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY> 65,856
<INTEREST-LOAN> 2,981
<INTEREST-INVEST> 1,450
<INTEREST-OTHER> 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL> 4,431
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT> 2,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 2,719
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET> 1,712
<LOAN-LOSSES> 5
<SECURITIES-GAINS> 10
<EXPENSE-OTHER> 1,838
<INCOME-PRETAX> 77
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY> 77
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 529
<EPS-PRIMARY> .45
<EPS-DILUTED> .45
<YIELD-ACTUAL> 2.74
<LOANS-NON> 493
<LOANS-PAST> 0
<LOANS-TROUBLED> 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM> 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN> 300
<CHARGE-OFFS> 5
<RECOVERIES> 0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE> 300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC> 300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN> 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED> 0
</TABLE>
