SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1 to
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1997
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
---------- ----------
Commission File Number 0-27744
PCD INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Massachusetts 04-2604950
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
2 Technology Drive
Centennial Park
Peabody, Massachusetts 01960-7977
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (978) 532-8800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the act: Common Stock,
$0.01 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
------- -------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
As of March 2, 1998, the aggregate market value of the registrant's Common
Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $68,106,324,
based upon the closing sales price on the Nasdaq Stock Market for that date
As of March 2, 1998, the number of issued and outstanding shares of the
registrant's Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, was 6,050,682.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain of the information called for by Parts I through IV of this report on
Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from certain portions of the Proxy
Statement of the registrant to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A and to be
sent to stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to
be held on June 5, 1998. Such Proxy Statement, except for the parts therein
that have been specifically incorporated herein by reference, shall not be
deemed "filed" as part of this report on Form 10-K
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
As used herein, the terms "Company" and "PCD," unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, refer to
PCD Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, and its subsidiaries,
including Wells Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Wells").
However, all financial information for periods ended before
December 26, 1997, unless otherwise indicated or the context
otherwise requires, is for PCD Inc. and its subsidiaries,
excluding Wells.
THE COMPANY
PCD Inc. (the "Company") designs, manufactures and markets
electronic connectors for use in integrated circuit ("IC")
package interconnect applications, industrial equipment and
avionics. Electronic connectors, which enable an electrical
current or signal to pass from one element to another within an
electronic system, range from minute individual connections
within an IC to rugged, multiple lead connectors that couple
various types of electrical/electronic equipment. Electronic
connectors are used in virtually all electronic systems,
including data communications, telecommunications, computers and
computer peripherals, industrial controls, automotive, avionics
and test and measurement instrumentation. The electronic
connector market is both large and broad. Bishop & Associates, a
leading electronic connector industry market research firm,
estimates the total 1997 worldwide market at $23.4 billion with
more than 2,000 manufacturers.
The Company markets over 6,800 electronic connector products
in three product categories, each targeting a specific market.
These product categories are IC package interconnects, industrial
interconnects and avionics terminal blocks and sockets. IC
package interconnects are specially designed electro-mechanical
devices that connect ICs to printed circuit boards during the
various stages of the IC's production and application in
electronic systems. These stages are test, burn-in, development
and production. Industrial interconnects are used in industrial
equipment systems both internally, as input/output ("I/O")
connectors to link the rugged electrical environment of operating
equipment to the electronic environment of controllers and
sensors, and externally, to facilitate the interface between
discrete factory wiring and cabling for standard computer
<PAGE>
interconnects. Avionics terminal blocks and sockets perform
similar functions as industrial connectors, but are designed and
built to operate in the harsher environment and meet the more
critical performance requirements of avionics applications.
Representative customers of the Company include Altera
Corporation, The Boeing Company, Micron Technology, Inc.,
Rockwell International Corp. (through its subsidiary, the Allen-
Bradley Company) and Siemens AG.
The Company believes it is benefiting from three trends
affecting the electronics industry: (i) the increasing complexity
of ICs and corresponding evolution of IC package designs, which
favor growth in PCD's IC package interconnect market; (ii) the
global nature of semiconductor manufacturers, which requires
suppliers with global design, manufacturing and marketing
capabilities; and (iii) the use of increasingly complex
electronic controllers and sensors in industrial and avionics
applications, which creates opportunities in PCD's industrial
equipment and avionics markets.
The Company has maintained a consistent strategy over the past
five years to identify and expand into selected electronic
connector markets where it can establish a position of
leadership. There are five key elements of the Company's
strategy: selection of key markets - market selection has
contributed to the compound annual growth in sales of the Company
(excluding Wells) of approximately 23.8% since 1993, and, after
giving effect to the Wells acquisition, the Company's net sales
in 1997, on a pro forma basis, were $71.4 million; total customer
solution - the Wells acquisition and the creation of the Control
Systems Interconnect division are examples of broadening the
Company's product offerings within targeted markets; customer
responsiveness/short delivery cycle - the introduction of just-in-
time ("JIT") manufacturing, inventory control techniques, and
quick-change, in-house production tooling have substantially
reduced the Company's delivery lead times; best cost producer -
the Company (excluding Wells) has experienced an improvement in
gross profit as a percentage of net sales from 33.1% in 1993 to
49.3% in 1997; and penetration of worldwide markets -
international sales of the Company (excluding Wells) increased
from 7.7% of net sales in 1993 to 35.8% in 1997, and, with the
addition of operations of Wells in Europe and Asia, the Company
expects that international sales will account for a significant
portion of its revenues for the foreseeable future.
<PAGE>
The Company was incorporated in Massachusetts on November 9,
1976 under the name Precision Connector Designs, Inc. In February
1996, the Company changed its name to PCD Inc.
MARKETS
The electrical and electronic systems which utilize connectors
have become increasingly widespread and complex, in part, as a
result of the increased automation of business systems and
manufacturing equipment. Consequently, the electronic connector
industry has grown in size and electronic connectors have become
more sophisticated. Demand for smaller yet more powerful products
has resulted in continued improvements in electronic systems in
general and electronic connectors in particular. Product cycles
continue to shorten and, as time to market becomes increasingly
important, equipment manufacturers seek to reduce inventory and
contend with pressures to keep up with new product innovations.
The growing demand for electronic connector complexity, coupled
with reduced product development cycles and delivery lead times,
create a need for closer cooperation between connector suppliers
and equipment manufacturers, often leading to new connector
requirements and market opportunities.
The electronic connector market is both large and broad.
Bishop & Associates estimates the total 1997 worldwide market at
$23.4 billion. This market is highly fragmented with over 2,000
manufacturers. While many of these companies produce connectors
which are relatively standard and often produced in large
quantities, a substantial portion of the industry is comprised of
companies which produce both proprietary and standard products in
relatively low volumes for specialized applications. Fleck
Research has identified over 1,100 separate electronic connector
product lines presently offered in the marketplace.
PCD focuses its products and sales efforts in the selected key
markets listed below.
IC PACKAGE INTERCONNECT MARKET: In the fabrication and use of
ICs, there are four stages in which sockets may be used: test,
burn-in, development and production. It is the Company's
objective to provide a total solution for selected IC packages
encompassing all four stages. By providing a total solution, the
Company believes it will be able to forge closer customer
relationships and gain acceptance by new customers.
<PAGE>
The Company's market position varies by market. TEST - Through
the Wells acquisition, the Company gained entrance to the IC
package test market with a program, which is in its early stage
and is designed to penetrate the test market. BURN-IN - The
Company believes that the combination of the burn-in product
lines of PCD and Wells makes the Company one of the worldwide
leaders in the burn-in market. DEVELOPMENT - The Company has been
active in the development market for a number of years, primarily
with a product line that it sells to Altera Corporation.
PRODUCTION - The Company has recently entered the production
market with the introduction of its Z-Lok(TM) BGA socket.
TEST - Test sockets are used primarily in semiconductor
foundries. After silicon wafers have been cut into individual
chips and packaged, certain electrical tests are performed to
detect packaging defects and to grade/sort the chips based on
various performance characteristics. Test sockets are
designed for specific packages and must withstand hundreds of
thousands of rapid insertions and withdrawals while offering
high reliability. Because of their intensive use, test
sockets have a relatively short useful life.
BURN-IN - Most leading-edge microprocessors, logic and
memory ICs undergo an extensive reliability screening and
stress testing procedure known as burn-in. The burn-in
process screens for early failures by operating the IC at
elevated voltages and temperatures, usually at 125 degree
symbolC (257 degree symbolF), for periods typically ranging
from 12 to 48 hours. During burn-in, the IC is secured in a
socket, an electro-mechanical interconnect, which is a
permanent fixture on the burn-in printed circuit board. The
socket is designed to permit easy insertion and removal of
the IC before and after burn-in. Further, these sockets must
be able to withstand up to 10,000 insertions and withdrawals
under extreme thermal cycle conditions.
DEVELOPMENT - The main purpose of the development socket is
to provide flexibility for the designer in performing
diagnostics of electronic design layouts and programming of
programmable logic devices ("PLDs") in the prototype and
early production stages of these layouts.
PRODUCTION - Production sockets provide an electro-mechanical
interface between the printed circuit board and the IC
package. Printed circuit boards form the backbone of all
electronic systems. The use of sockets allows a detachable
<PAGE>
interconnection between the IC and printed circuit board and
benefits both the systems manufacturer and end consumer.
Sockets provide flexibility in production by allowing
manufacturers to produce the printed circuit board with
unpopulated sockets, then populate the board with ICs at a
later date. Sockets also make upgrading easier and more
flexible for the consumer by allowing for the replacement of
a chip on a printed circuit board without disturbing or
damaging other elements of the board.
The worldwide semiconductor market has grown in five of the
last six years and is projected by Integrated Circuit Engineering
Corporation, a leading research company in the semiconductor
field, to grow at a compound annual growth rate over the next
five years in excess of 15%.
INDUSTRIAL INTERCONNECT MARKET: The industrial interconnect
market is comprised of a broad range of control, measurement and
manufacturing equipment. Terminal blocks are most commonly used
in this equipment to provide an electrical link between discrete
functions, such as monitoring and measuring, and controlling
devices, such as programmable logic controllers ("PLCs"), stand-
alone PCs and single function controllers. The use of terminal
blocks has increased as electronic controllers and sensors in the
industrial environment have evolved to control more complex,
multi- function activities. In addition to increasing in number,
these controllers and their connectors are becoming smaller and
are being configured in increasing variations.
Increased sophistication in industrial and process control
equipment has led to a demand for flexible, modular
interconnection and interface products. Control systems are used
to facilitate the interface of discrete factory wiring and cable
systems with standard computer interconnects. These interface
systems allow industrial customers to reduce installation time
and decrease cabinet space, thereby improving their overall
system costs.
PCD is benefiting from the proliferation of factory automation
and the embedded electronics which control manufacturing
processes. This trend has spurred demand not only for increased
unit volume of terminal blocks but also for interface modules
with higher density and greater diversity of configurations.
Within the industrial interconnect market, the Company focuses
its sales and marketing efforts on North America. Bishop &
<PAGE>
Associates forecasts sales of industrial interconnect products in
North America to grow at a 6.2% compound annual growth rate, from
$891 million in 1997 to $1.2 billion in 2002.
AVIONICS MARKET: The avionics market requires a diverse range
of electronic connectors that are designed and manufactured
specifically for avionics applications. Over the last few years,
commercial aircraft applications have represented an increasingly
important part of this market. The Company participates in
selected areas of the avionics market with terminal blocks and
sockets that perform similar functions as its industrial
connectors but are designed to operate in the harsher environment
and meet the more critical performance requirements of avionics
applications.
The world fleet of commercial transport aircraft, which
includes all aircraft with 50 seats or more, is projected by The
Boeing Company to grow from 11,500 airplanes at the end of 1996
to almost 17,000 airplanes in 2006. Over the next ten years, The
Boeing Company estimates that more than 7,300 new commercial jets
will enter service worldwide. The majority of these airplanes
will meet industry demand for growth, while the remainder will
replace the 1,900 airplanes that are projected to be removed from
service. According to The Boeing Company, many of these airplanes
are expected to be removed from service due to the International
Civil Aviation Organization ("ICAO") requirement that in the
United States all airplanes must comply with the ICAO Stage 3
noise standard as of December 31, 1999. Of the 1,900 airplanes
projected to be removed from service between 1997 and 2006, three
out of four are expected to be removed during the next five
years.
STRATEGY
Before the Wells acquisition, both PCD and Wells shared
similar strategies, and the Company has developed a unified
strategy for the future. The Company's goal is to identify and
expand into selected electronic connector markets where it can
establish a position of leadership. The Company intends to
increase its presence in the markets in which it participates
through internal investment in product development and potential
strategic acquisitions. The key elements of the Company's
strategy are:
SELECTION OF KEY MARKETS: The Company actively identifies
and pursues areas of the electronic connector market which
<PAGE>
have the following characteristics: demand for electronic
connectors with relatively high engineering content, high
degree of customer interface, changing technology,
significant growth opportunities and a market size
appropriate to the Company's resources. The Company focuses
on the IC package, industrial and avionics interconnect
markets. The recent acquisition of Wells emphasizes the
Company's strategy of selection of key markets by expanding
its share of the IC package interconnect market. Similarly,
the Company recently formed its Control Systems Interconnect
division in order to enter the interface module market which
the Company believes is a rapidly growing segment of the
interconnect market.
TOTAL CUSTOMER SOLUTION: The Company seeks to anticipate
evolving market requirements and capitalize on its design
capabilities to rapidly develop products that meet those
needs. PCD has increased its product offerings and design
capabilities to provide a total product solution to its
customers. These customers are increasingly seeking a
solution to an expanding array of product requirements and
services, resulting in the establishment of closer strategic
relationships between PCD and its customers. The Company
believes its total solution approach meets these customer
needs by shortening the new product development cycle,
helping them to meet their time-to-market requirements and
providing product specific expertise.
CUSTOMER RESPONSIVENESS/SHORT DELIVERY CYCLE: The Company
believes that responding quickly to customer needs is a
critical competitive factor in the markets in which it
participates. Increasing emphasis by customers on time to
market with new designs, inventory reduction and shorter, and
more frequent production runs has created the need for more
responsive, innovative vendors. The Company's introduction of
just-in time ("JIT") manufacturing, inventory control
techniques and quick-change, in-house production tooling
have substantially reduced the Company's delivery lead times
enabling the Company to respond more quickly to its customers'
needs.
BEST COST PRODUCER: In the markets in which the Company
competes, high quality is a prerequisite. The Company's goal
is to be the low cost producer for comparable product designs
in each of these markets. The Company strives for continuous
cost reduction and monitors its progress closely throughout
<PAGE>
the year. As part of this program, engineering and
manufacturing work closely together from the inception of all
new product programs.
PENETRATION OF WORLDWIDE MARKETS: The Company has recently
placed great emphasis on marketing its products on a
worldwide basis and currently sells to its foreign customers
both directly and through U.S. and foreign distributors.
According to Bishop & Associates, non-U.S. sales accounted
for over 60% of 1997 sales in the world connector market.
International sales of the Company (excluding Wells) as a
percentage of net sales increased from 7.7% in 1993 to 35.8%
in 1997. As a result of the Wells acquisition, the Company
now has an operating subsidiary in Japan ("Wells Japan"), and
sales or technical support operations in England, Germany,
South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore, which the Company
believes will expand its ability to serve the global
semiconductor market.
PRODUCTS AND APPLICATIONS
The Company markets over 6,800 electronic connector products
in three product categories, each targeting a specific market.
These product categories are: IC package interconnects,
industrial interconnects and avionics terminal blocks and
sockets. The products offered within each product category can be
characterized as either proprietary, application specific or
industry standard, as described below.
PROPRIETARY connectors are unique Company designs that are
introduced and sold to a broad market rather than a single
customer.
APPLICATION-SPECIFIC interconnects are products which are
designed and developed for a specific application, typically
for one customer. These products can be subsequently
developed into proprietary product lines.
INDUSTRY STANDARD connectors are normally produced in
accordance with a relatively detailed industry or military
design and performance specification and sold to the broad
market to which that specification relates.
<PAGE>
IC PACKAGE INTERCONNECTS
ICs (which before being packaged are frequently referred to as
dies) are generally encased in a plastic or ceramic package to
protect the device and facilitate its connection with other
system components. The IC package industry offers a wide variety
of evolving package designs. New package designs are driven by
the need to accommodate the increasing complexity and higher lead
count ICs. Each unique IC package configuration requires a socket
that corresponds to the package's specific characteristics.
ICs are constantly increasing in functionality while generally
decreasing in unit cost. This leads to an increase in IC product
application, thereby driving IC unit growth. This unit growth and
the proliferation of sizes and packages drives the demand for IC
sockets.
Based on industry reports, unit demand for major package types
are expected to increase at a compound annual growth rate of 8.1%
from 1996 to 2001. The Company offers products within all package
families, however, the Company primarily focuses on the Small
Outline ("SO") Package Sockets, Quad Flat Pack ("QFP") Sockets,
Pin Grid Array ("PGA") Sockets and Ball Grid Array ("BGA")
Sockets. Based on industry reports, the projected compound annual
growth rates for SO, QFP, PGA and BGA package families are 8.5%,
16.7%, 8.3% and 59.3%, respectively, from 1996 to 2001.
SMALL OUTLINE PACKAGE SOCKETS: The SO is a plastic,
rectangular package with leads on two sides, running along
either pair of opposite edges. With lead counts from 8 to 64
leads, the SO houses simple logic, memory and linear dies.
Most SO packages are 44 leads and below. Devices tend to
transition to the QFP above this lead count. The small size,
low price and surface mount design of the SO makes it a
highly desirable package. The Company currently produces 170
distinct sockets to accommodate a variety of SO packages.
QUAD FLAT PACK SOCKETS: The QFP is a plastic package with
leads on four sides. It is used for high lead count surface
mount applications and is characterized by lead counts
typically ranging between 40 and 208 leads. The QFP is
currently a predominant and rapidly growing technology for
packaging of leading edge ICs used in microprocessor,
communication and memory applications. The Company currently
produces over 37 distinct sockets to accommodate a wide
variety of QFP packages.
<PAGE>
PIN GRID ARRAY SOCKETS: The PGA is a square or rectangular
through-hole device that affects routing through all layers
of the printed circuit board. The pins are generally placed
on the package before insertion of the die. The
differentiating feature of the PGA is that the contacts are
placed in an array over the bottom of the packaged device,
rather than protruding from the sides of the device in a
perimeter pattern, as with the QFP. As a result, the PGA
offers greater lead density and smaller overall profile. This
makes the PGA ideal for devices with high lead counts, in
excess of 208, the upper range in which the QFP becomes
difficult to handle.
BALL GRID ARRAY SOCKETS: Similar to the PGA, the BGA uses an
underlying substrate, rather than a lead frame, for die
attachment. The die is then encapsulated and solderballs are
attached to the underside of the substrate. The solderballs
ultimately attach the package to the printed circuit board.
The die is placed in the package prior to the attachment of
the solderballs to ensure a flat surface for the die during
processing. In some cases, the packaged BGA is referred to as
the BGA Chip-Scale Package ("BGA/CSP") because the package
is only slightly larger (i.e. less than 20% larger) than the
die itself. Whereas the PGA contacts the printed circuit
board at all layers using through-hole connection, the BGA
contacts the printed circuit board only at the surface. This
allows the BGA to achieve a lower profile, lighter weight and
smaller area on the printed circuit board due to surface
mounting.
INDUSTRIAL INTERCONNECTS
The Company's product areas in this market are industrial
terminal blocks and interface modules. Terminal blocks are most
commonly used in industrial equipment to provide an electrical
link between discrete functions, such as monitoring and
measuring, and a controlling device. Interface modules facilitate
the interface between discrete factory wiring and cabling for
standard computer interconnects. The Company's industrial
interconnects are targeted at the industrial and process control
markets and affiliated markets and applications such as
environmental control systems, food and beverage preparation,
motor controls, machine tools, robotics,
instrumentation and test equipment.
<PAGE>
TERMINAL BLOCKS: Terminal blocks are used in applications
where I/O power or signal wires are fed into a PLC or similar
(and often simpler) control system, and a connector is
required to interface between the electrical environment of
relatively heavy wires and the electronic environment of
controllers and sensors. The Company's terminal blocks
connect to and capture the wires in screw-clamp terminations,
and interface with printed circuit boards in a variety of
manners. The Company concentrates on four major product lines
within this market: pluggable terminal blocks, fixed mount
terminal blocks, edgecard terminal blocks, and application
-specific terminal blocks. Application-specific terminal
blocks are developed for customers who are of strategic
importance to the Company, represent significant potential
volume and are recognized market leaders.
INTERFACE MODULES: Interface modules are interconnect
devices that incorporate terminal blocks, high density
connectors and often additional electronic components and are
used to form the interconnection between a system I/O card
and field equipment. Often these interconnections require
several discrete wire and standard computer connector
interconnects. The interface module simplifies the
interconnection by incorporating both the discrete wire and
standard computer interconnects into a rail mounted printed
circuit board assembly consisting of terminal blocks,
additional connectors and possibly other electronic devices.
Interface modules are typically application-specific and may
contain electronic components for signal conditioning,
fusing and various other electronic requirements.
AVIONICS TERMINAL BLOCKS AND SOCKETS
Avionics terminal blocks perform similar functions as
industrial terminal blocks, linking discrete wires that are
individually terminated to a connector. However, avionics
terminal blocks are designed to withstand the harsher environment
and far more critical operating requirements to which they are
subject. The primary differences are that: contacts are gold
plated; wires are terminated by the crimped (metal deformation)
technique rather than screw clamps; and individual wires are
installed and removed from the connector through use of spring-
actuated locking devices. The avionics connectors are normally
completely environmentally sealed through use of a silicon
elastomer sealing grommet or are designed to operate in a sealed
compartment.
<PAGE>
The Company concentrates on three major product lines in the
avionics market:
RELAY SOCKETS: Relay sockets are used throughout aircraft as
a means to facilitate installation, repair and maintenance of
electro-mechanical relays which are utilized for a wide
variety of control purposes ranging from main control
circuits to landing gear.
JUNCTION MODULES: Junction modules are environmentally
sealed, airborne terminal blocks.
APPLICATION-SPECIFIC AVIONICS CONNECTORS: Application
-specific junction modules have been developed in conjunction
with Boeing Commercial Aircraft for use on the 737-747-757
-767 series of commercial aircraft; and with Douglas Aircraft
Company for the MD11 and C17 aircraft. Application-specific
relay sockets are marketed to Boeing subcontractors for the
777 commercial aircraft program and to Douglas for the MD11
and C17 aircraft.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
Currently, the Company markets over 6,800 products in a wide
variety of product lines. The Company seeks to broaden its
product lines and to expand its technical capabilities in order
to meet its customers' anticipated needs. Through the Wells
acquisition, the Company anticipates improved project design
capacity resulting from focusing new product development
resources and eliminating project duplication. The Company's
product development strategy is to introduce new products into
markets where the Company has already established a leadership
position and to develop next generation products for other
markets in which the Company wishes to participate. The following
product lines were introduced in 1997: high density terminal
blocks, production BGA Z-Lok(TM) sockets, test sockets and
Flexiplug(TM), and a number of application-specific products for
major market leaders in the IC package interconnect, industrial
equipment and avionics markets, including Micron, AMD, Groupe
Schneider and Rockwell International Corp. (through its
subsidiary Allen-Bradley).
The Company's current product development projects in the IC
package interconnect market target new package device designs
such as BGA, TSOP and CSP burn-in, test and BGA production
packages. The Company believes, based on industry trends, that
<PAGE>
BGA will become the preferred package for high-lead count IC
packages (in excess of 300 leads). The Company also believes,
based on industry trends, that SOP and CSP will be the preferred
package for high-volume, high-density small outline IC devices.
In the industrial equipment market, the Company is scheduled to
introduce a series of multi-tier fixed terminal blocks in the
first half of 1998. The initial interface modules were
introduced in January 1998, and a number of custom designs are
expected to follow during the year. New application-specific
products are also being developed. Among these products is a
product similar to the Company's Flexiplug(TM) product being
developed for Rockwell International Corp. (Allen-Bradley
Company), which is projected to go into production in the second
half of 1998. For Groupe Schneider, the Company has developed a
number of standard and application-specific fixed terminal
blocks, which are projected to be introduced in the second
quarter of 1998.
SALES AND MARKETING
The Company distributes its products through a combination of
its own dedicated direct sales forces, a worldwide network of
manufacturers representatives and authorized distributors. The
Company maintains separate sales forces for the IC package
interconnect markets and for the industrial equipment and
avionics markets. For the IC package interconnect markets, the
Company employs a global direct sales force with offices in
England, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and the
United States, augmented with sales representatives in smaller
markets. The Company has integrated the Wells sales force with
PCD's sales force for the IC package interconnect markets. For
the industrial equipment and avionics markets, the Company
generally uses its direct sales forces and manufacturer
representatives for large customers, new product introductions
and application-specific products and uses its authorized
distributors for smaller and medium-sized customers of standard
and proprietary products. The Company's sales and marketing
program is focused on achieving and maintaining close working
relationships with its customers early in the design phase of the
customer's own product development.
CUSTOMERS
In 1997, products of the Company (excluding Wells) were sold
to over 1,300 customers in a wide range of industries and
applications. The top five customers of the Company (excluding
<PAGE>
Wells) in 1997 accounted for 42.7% of net sales. Altera
Corporation accounted for 14.5%, 17.4% and 16.6% of net sales of
the Company (excluding Wells) in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and TNT Distributors, Inc. accounted for 12.7%, and
13.4% of net sales of the Company (excluding Wells) in 1997 and
1995, respectively. In 1997, principal end users of products of
Wells included Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Micron Technology,
Inc. and Siemens AG. Sales to customers located outside the
United States, either directly or through U.S. and foreign
distributors, accounted for approximately 35.8%, 22.1% and 28.1%
of the net sales of the Company (excluding Wells) in the years
ended 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Examples of end users of the Company's products, by category,
are presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PRODUCT CATEGORIES REPRESENTATIVE CUSTOMERS
- ------------------ --------------------------------
<S> <C>
IC Package Interconnects............ Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Altera Corporation
Micron Technology, Inc.
Motorola
Siemens AG
Industrial Interconnects............ Checkpoint Systems, Inc.
Groupe Schneider (Modicon, Inc./
Square D Co/Telemecanique)
Honeywell, Inc.
Pacific Scientific Company
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Rockwell International Corp.
(Allen Bradley Company)
Avionics Terminal Blocks and Sockets Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.
The Boeing Company
Bombardier Inc. (Canadair/
DeHavilland/Learjet Inc.)
British Aerospace Ltd.
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S/A
(Embraer)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
MANUFACTURING AND ENGINEERING
The Company is vertically integrated from the initial concept
stage through final design and manufacturing with regard to the
key production processes which the Company believes are critical
to product performance and service. These processes include
precision stamping, plastic injection molding and automated
assembly. The Company believes that this vertical integration
allows the Company to respond to customers quickly, control
quality and reduce the time to market for new product
development.
The Company seeks to reduce costs in its manufacturing
fabrication and assembly operations through formalized cost
savings programs. Complementary programs are dedicated to
maximizing the return on capital investments and reducing
overhead expense.
The Company believes it is a leader in delivery responsiveness
in its target markets. The introduction of just-in-time ("JIT")
manufacturing, inventory control techniques and quick-change, in-
house production tooling have substantially reduced delivery lead
times. Production cells operate under a JIT pull system, with
customer orders assembled as received. PCD carries minimal
finished goods inventory. An additional advantage of JIT
manufacturing is the almost complete elimination of rework. Shop
floor orders are not handled in bulk and are relatively small,
and problems are resolved as they occur, rather than continuing
through an extended production run.
Wells Japan subcontracts all of its product manufacturing and
final assembly operations to approximately six Japanese vendors.
In calendar year 1997, Wells derived $15.1 million (or
approximately 21.1% of the Company's pro forma 1997 revenues)
from Wells Japan. The Company does not subcontract any other
final product assembly. In addition, the Company subcontracts a
portion of its labor-intensive product subassembly to a U.S.-
based subcontractor with a manufacturing facility in Mexico. In
1997, the Company derived $2.3 million (or approximately 3.2% of
its pro forma 1997 revenues) from products which subassembly was
performed by such subcontractor. The Company is not contractually
obligated to do business with any subcontractor, could substitute
other subcontractors without significant additional cost or delay,
and could perform assembly itself if the need were to arise.
<PAGE>
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The Company seeks to use a combination of patents and other
means to establish and protect its intellectual property rights
in various products. The Company intends to vigorously defend its
intellectual property rights against infringement or
misappropriation. Due to the nature of its products, the Company
believes that intellectual property protection is less
significant than the Company's ability to further develop,
enhance and modify its current products. The Company believes
that its products do not infringe on the intellectual property
rights of others. However, many of the Company's competitors have
obtained or developed, and may be expected to obtain or develop
in the future, patents or other proprietary rights that cover or
affect products that perform functions similar to those performed
by products offered by the Company. There can be no assurance
that, in the future, the Company's products will not be held to
infringe patent claims of its competitors, or that the Company is
aware of all patents containing claims that may pose a risk of
infringement by its products.
COMPETITION
The markets in which PCD operates are highly competitive, and
the Company faces competition from a number of different
manufacturers. The Company has experienced significant price
pressure with respect to certain products, including its TSOP
product. The principal competitive factors affecting the market
for the Company's products include design, responsiveness,
quality, price, reputation and reliability. The Company believes
that it competes favorably on these factors.
Generally, the electronic connector industry is competitive
and fragmented, with over 2,000 manufacturers worldwide.
Competition in the IC package interconnect market, however, is
highly concentrated among a small number of significant
competitors. Competition among manufacturers of application-
specific connectors in the industrial terminal blocks market
depends greatly on the customer, market and specific nature of
the requirement. Competition is fragmented in the avionics
market, but there are fewer competitors due to the demanding
nature of the military and customer specifications which control
much of the markets and the cost and time required to tool and
qualify military standard parts. In each of the markets in which
the Company participates, the Company's significant competitors
are much larger and have substantially broader product lines and
<PAGE>
greater financial resources than the Company. There can be no
assurance that the Company will compete successfully, and any
failure to compete successfully could have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, results of operations and
business of the Company.
BACKLOG
The Company defines its backlog as orders that are scheduled
for delivery within the next 12 months. The Company estimates
that its backlog of unfilled orders was approximately
$11.9 million (including Wells) at December 31, 1997, all of
which the Company expects to fill in 1998, and $7.3 million
(excluding Wells) at December 31, 1996. The level and timing of
orders placed by the Company's customers vary due to customer
attempts to manage inventory, changes in manufacturing strategy
and variations in demand for customer products due to, among
other things, introductions of new products, product life cycles,
competitive conditions or general economic conditions. The
Company generally does not obtain long-term purchase orders or
commitments but instead seeks to work closely with its customers
to anticipate the volume of future orders. Based on anticipated
future volumes, the Company makes other significant decisions
regarding the level of business it will accept, the timing of
production and the levels and utilization of personnel and other
resources. A variety of conditions, both specific to the
individual customer and generally affecting the customer's
industry, may cause customers to cancel, reduce or delay purchase
orders that were either previously made or anticipated.
Generally, customers may cancel, reduce or delay purchase orders
and commitments without penalty. For these reasons, backlog may
not be indicative of future demand or results of operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Company is subject to a wide range of environmental laws
and regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge and
disposal of hazardous chemicals used during its manufacturing
process. A failure by the Company to comply with present or
future laws and regulations could subject it to future
liabilities or the suspension of production. Such laws and
regulations could also restrict the Company's ability to expand
its facilities or could require the Company to acquire costly
equipment or incur other significant expenses.
<PAGE>
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1997, the Company had 362 employees and 18
contract workers. The Company's 380 employees and contract
workers include 306 in manufacturing and engineering, 45 in sales
and marketing and 29 in administration. Of the Company's U.S.
employees, 53 are represented by the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 1392. The Company believes that its
relations with its employees and their union are good. The
current collective bargaining agreement expires on February 18,
2000.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
WELLS ACQUISITION
On December 26, 1997, the Company completed the acquisition
(the "Wells acquisition") of Wells Electronics, Inc. ("Wells").
Wells designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad line of
test and burn-in sockets and plastic carriers for the global
semiconductor industry. In combining the existing burn-in
business of PCD with that of Wells, the Company now supports
complete design, development, manufacturing and marketing of test
and burn-in sockets in two of the world's largest IC package
interconnect markets: the United States and Japan. The Company
believes that benefits of the combination of PCD and Wells
include: (i) complementary product lines that together provide an
extensive product offering of burn-in sockets as well as test,
development and production sockets; (ii) complementary major
customers with little overlap; and (iii) improved project design
capacity resulting from focusing new product development
resources and eliminating project duplication.
Over the last three years, Wells has employed a similar
strategy to that of the Company. From fiscal 1995 (52 weeks ended
June 3, 1995), to fiscal 1997 (53 weeks ended May 3, 1997), the
net sales of Wells increased from $18.6 million to $27.5 million.
With the inclusion of the net sales of Wells, consolidated pro
forma net sales and income from operations (before deducting the
non-recurring write-off relating to the Wells acquisition of
acquired in-process research and development) for the Company
totaled $71.4 million and $21.7 million, respectively, in 1997.
<PAGE>
PUBLIC OFFERING
On February 12, 1998, the Company filed a Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-46137)(the
"Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange
Commission with respect to the sale of 2,000,000 shares of its
Common Stock. The Company amended the Registration
Statement on March 20, 1998 and April 13, 1998. The Registration
Statement was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 16, 1998.
NEW CREDIT FACILITY, SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE AND WARRANT
On December 26, 1997, the Company entered into a new credit
agreement with Fleet National Bank as agent for itself and other
lenders ("Credit Facility") consisting of an aggregate $70.0
million in term loans and a $20.0 million revolving credit loan.
On the same date, the Company also issued a $25.0 million
Subordinated Debenture (the "Debenture") and a common stock
purchase warrant (the "Emerson Warrant") to Emerson Electric Co.
For further discussion of the Credit Facility, Debenture, and the
Emerson Warrant see Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and
Capital Resources appearing in Item 7 hereof and Notes 8 and 9 of
Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
appearing in Item 8 hereof.
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements in this report concerning the future revenues,
profitability, financial resources, product mix, market demand,
product development and other statements in this report
concerning the future results of operations, financial condition
and business of the PCD Inc. are "forward-looking" statements as
defined in the Securities Act of 1933 and Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Investors are cautioned that the Company's actual
results in the future may differ materially from those projected
in the forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties
that exist in the Company's operations and business environment,
including:
DEPENDENCE ON IC PACKAGE INTERCONNECT AND SEMICONDUCTOR
INDUSTRIES. The Company's semiconductor or integrated circuit
("IC") package interconnect sockets are used by producers and
testers of ICs and original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs"). For
the year ended December 31, 1997, the Company (excluding
<PAGE>
Wells) derived 42.3% of its net sales from these products. The
Company's future success will depend in substantial part on the
vitality of the semiconductor and the related IC package
interconnect industries. The Company's recent acquisition of
Wells Electronics, Inc. ("Wells"), a supplier of IC package
interconnects, significantly increases the Company's dependence
on the IC package interconnect industry. Historically, the IC
package interconnect industry has been driven by both the
technology requirements and unit demands of the semiconductor
industry. Depressed general economic conditions and cyclical
downturns in the semiconductor industry have had an adverse
economic effect on the IC package interconnect market. In
addition, the product cycle of existing IC package designs and
the timing of new IC package development and introduction can
affect the demand for IC package interconnect sockets. Reduced
demand for semiconductors and their related packages would have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the Company.
DEPENDENCE ON PRINCIPAL CUSTOMERS. Altera Corporation
("Altera"), a provider of high performance, high density
programmable logic devices, has been the largest customer of the
Company (excluding Wells) since 1994. Altera accounted for 14.5%,
17.4% and 16.6% of the net sales of the Company (excluding Wells)
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. Sales to TNT Distributors, Inc. ("TNT"), a
semiconductor equipment distributor, accounted for 12.7% and
13.4% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 1997 and
1995, respectively. Sales by Wells to Advanced Micro Devices,
Inc. ("AMD"), Dynavision, Inc. ("Dynavision") and Micron
Technology, Inc. ("Micron") accounted for 12.0%, 11.6% and 29.6%,
respectively, of net sales by Wells for the pro forma calendar
year ended December 31, 1997. The Company does not have written
agreements with any of its customers, including Altera, AMD,
Dynavision, Micron or TNT, and therefore, no customer has any
minimum purchase obligations. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that any of the Company's customers will purchase the
Company's products beyond those covered by released purchase
orders. The loss of, or significant decrease in, business from
Altera, AMD, Dynavision, Micron or TNT, for any reason, would
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition,
results of operations and business of the Company.
ACQUISITIONS AND INDEBTEDNESS. The Company acquired all of
the capital stock of Wells, a manufacturer of IC package
interconnect products, on December 26, 1997. Wells currently
<PAGE>
operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Subject to
compliance with the Company's credit facility ("Senior Credit
Facility") with Fleet National Bank and other lenders, the
Company may from time to time pursue the acquisition of other
companies, assets, products or technologies. The Company has
limited experience in integrating acquired companies or
technologies into its operations. Therefore, there can be no
assurance that the Company will operate Wells or other acquired
businesses profitably in the future. Acquisitions involve a
number of operating risks that could materially adversely affect
the Company's operating results, including the diversion of
management's attention to assimilate the operations, products and
personnel of the acquired companies, the amortization of acquired
intangible assets and the potential loss of key employees of the
acquired companies. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to manage acquisitions successfully or that the
Company will be able to integrate the operations, products or
personnel gained through any such acquisitions without a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations
and business of the Company. Accordingly, operating expenses
associated with acquired businesses may have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition, results of operations and
business of the Company.
The Company incurred substantial indebtedness in connection
with the Wells acquisition and, subject to compliance with the
terms of the Senior Credit Facility, may incur additional
indebtedness in connection with future acquisitions. The
incurrence of substantial amounts of debt could increase the risk
of the Company's operations. If the Company's cash flow and
existing working capital are not sufficient to fund its general
working capital requirements or to service its indebtedness, the
Company would have to raise additional funds through the sale of
its equity securities, the refinancing of all or part of its
indebtedness or the sale of assets or subsidiaries. There can be
no assurance that any of these sources of funds would be
available in amounts sufficient for the Company to meet its
obligations, if at all. The cost of debt financing may also
impair the ability of the Company to maintain adequate working
capital or to make future acquisitions. In addition, the issuance
of additional shares of Common Stock in connection with
acquisitions could be dilutive to existing investors.
INTERNATIONAL SALES AND OPERATIONS. Sales to customers
located outside the United States, either directly or through
U.S. and foreign distributors, accounted for approximately 35.8%,
<PAGE>
22.1% and 28.1% of the net sales of the Company (excluding Wells)
in the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and the Company believes that, with the addition of
Wells, international sales will account for a significant portion
of its revenues for the foreseeable future. International
revenues are subject to a number of risks, including: longer
accounts receivable payment cycles; exchange rate fluctuations;
difficulty in enforcing agreements and intellectual property
rights and in collecting accounts receivable; tariffs and other
restrictions on foreign trade; withholding and other tax
consequences; economic and political instability; and the burdens
of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. Sales made to
foreign customers or foreign distributors may be denominated in
either U.S. dollars or in the currencies of the countries where
sales are made. The Company has not to date sought to hedge the
risks associated with fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and
does not currently plan to do so. The Company's foreign sales and
operations are also affected by general economic conditions in
its international markets. A prolonged economic downturn in its
foreign markets could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business. As a result of the Wells acquisition, the
Company now has an operating subsidiary in Japan, and sales or
technical support operations in England, Germany, South Korea,
Malaysia and Singapore. Recent and continuing volatility in the
Asian economies and financial and currencies markets may have a
material adverse effect on the Company's current and planned
sales and operations in that region, particularly with respect to
the Company's IC package interconnect business. In addition, the
laws of certain countries do not protect the Company's products
and intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the
laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that the
factors described above will not have an adverse effect on the
Company's future international revenues and, consequently, on the
financial condition, results of operations and business of the
Company.
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS UNDER SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY. The
agreement governing the Senior Credit Facility contains numerous
financial and operating covenants. There can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to maintain compliance with these
covenants, and failure to meet such covenants would result in an
event of default under the Senior Credit Facility. Among these
covenants are restrictions that the Company (i) must maintain
John L. Dwight, Jr. as chief executive officer of the Company or
obtain the consent of the lenders under the Senior Credit
Facility to any replacement of Mr. Dwight; (ii) may not, without
<PAGE>
the prior consent of such lenders, acquire the assets of or
ownership interests in, or merge with, other companies; and (iii)
may not, without the prior consent of such lenders, pay cash
dividends.
FLUCTUATIONS IN OPERATING RESULTS. The variability of the
level and timing of orders from, and shipments to, major
customers may result in significant fluctuations in the Company's
quarterly results of operations. The Company generally does not
obtain long-term purchase orders or commitments but instead seeks
to work closely with its customers to anticipate the volume of
future orders. Generally, customers may cancel, reduce or delay
purchase orders and commitments without penalty. Cancellations,
reductions or delays in orders by a customer or groups of
customers could have a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, results of operations and business of the Company. In
addition to the variability resulting from the short-term nature
of its customers' commitments, other factors have contributed,
and may in the future contribute, to such fluctuations. These
factors may include, among other things, customers' and
competitors' announcement and introduction of new products or new
generations of products, evolutions in the life cycles of
customers' products, timing of expenditures in anticipation of
future orders, effectiveness in managing manufacturing processes,
changes in cost and availability of labor and components, shifts
in the Company's product mix and changes or anticipated changes
in economic conditions. In addition, it is not uncommon in the
electronic connector industry for results of operations to
display a seasonal pattern of declining revenues in the third
quarter of the calendar year. Although the Company's results of
operations did not display this pattern in 1997 and 1995, it did
occur in 1996 and is likely to occur in the future. Because the
Company's operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue
levels and a high percentage of the Company's operating expenses
are relatively fixed, any unanticipated shortfall in revenue in a
quarter may have a material adverse impact on the Company's
results of operations for the quarter. Results of operations for
any period should not be considered indicative of the results to
be anticipated for any future period.
TECHNOLOGICAL EVOLUTION. The rapid technological evolution of
the electronics industry requires the Company to anticipate and
respond rapidly to changes in industry standards and customer
needs and to develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a
timely and cost-effective basis. In particular, the Company must
target its development of IC package interconnect sockets based
<PAGE>
on which next generation IC package designs the Company expects
to be successful. The Company must manage transitions from
products using present technology to those that utilize next
generation technology in order to maintain or increase sales and
profitability, minimize disruptions in customer orders and avoid
excess inventory of products that are less responsive to customer
demand. Any failure of the Company to respond effectively to
changes in industry standards and customer needs, develop and
introduce new products and manage product transitions would have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the Company.
MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH. The Company has grown rapidly in recent
years, in particular through the Wells acquisition in
December 1997. A continuing period of rapid growth could place a
significant strain on the Company's management, operations and
other resources. The Company's ability to manage its growth will
require it to continue to invest in its operational, financial
and management information systems, and to attract, retain,
motivate and effectively manage its employees. The inability of
the Company's management to manage growth effectively would have
a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the Company.
PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCT PROTECTION. The Company's
success depends in part on its ability to maintain the
proprietary and confidential aspects of its products as they are
released. The Company seeks to use a combination of patents and
other means to establish and protect its proprietary rights.
There can be no assurance, however, that the precautions taken by
the Company will be adequate to protect the Company's technology.
In addition, many of the Company's competitors have obtained or
developed, and may be expected to obtain or develop in the
future, patents or other proprietary rights that cover or affect
products that perform functions similar to those performed by
products offered by the Company. There can be no assurance that,
in the future, the Company's products will not be held to
infringe patent claims of its competitors, or that the Company is
aware of all patents containing claims that may pose a risk of
infringement by its products. The inability of the Company for
any reason to protect existing technology or otherwise acquire
such technology could prevent distribution of the Company's
products, having a material adverse effect on the financial
condition, results of operations and business of the Company.
<PAGE>
PATENT LITIGATION. On August 21, 1995, the Company's wholly-
owned subsidiary, CTi Technologies, Inc. ("CTi"), filed an action
in the United States District Court for the District of
Arizona against Wayne K. Pfaff, an individual residing in Texas
("Pfaff"), and Plastronics Socket Company, Inc., a corporation
affiliated with Pfaff, alleging and seeking a declaratory
judgment that two United States patents issued to Pfaff and
relating to certain burn-in sockets for "leadless" IC packages
(the "Pfaff Leadless Patent") and ball grid array ("BGA") IC
packages (the "Pfaff BGA Patent") (collectively, the "Pfaff
Patents") are invalid and are not infringed by CTi, the products
of which include burn-in sockets for certain "leaded" packages
(including Quad Flat Paks) (the "CTi Leaded Products") and BGA
packages (the "CTi BGA Products") (collectively, the "CTi
Products"). Pfaff has filed a counterclaim alleging that CTi
infringes the "Pfaff Leadless Patent" and has requested an award
of damages; the counterclaim does not allege infringement of the
Pfaff BGA Patent. Pfaff has also sought a permanent injunction
against further infringement by CTi of the Pfaff Leadless Patent.
That action has been stayed pending resolution of another action,
described below, involving the Pfaff Leadless Patent.
In litigation between Wells and Pfaff concerning the Pfaff
Leadless Patent, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit has found all of the individual descriptions of
the invention (the "Claims" of the patent) of the Pfaff Leadless
Patent which were at issue in that case to be invalid. The basis
for the decision of the Court of Appeals was a finding that the
invention covered by the Pfaff Leadless Patent had been "on sale"
for more than one year before the filing of the patent
application. An invention that has been "on sale" for more than
one year before the filing of a patent application may not be
patented. Certain other Claims of the patent were not at issue in
the Pfaff v. Wells case and their validity was not decided by the
Court of Appeals, because Pfaff did not allege that products of
Wells infringed such Claims. These other Claims include design
elements not incorporated into products of Wells or CTi, including
the use of contact pins formed with a pair of parallel blades
extending from a common base. The United States Supreme Court has
accepted an appeal on the Pfaff v. Wells case, limited to the
question of whether the Pfaff Leadless Patent should have been
held invalid on the basis of the "on sale" bar if Pfaff's
invention was not "fully completed" more than one year before he
filed his patent application. The Supreme Court could affirm or
reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. If the Supreme
Court affirms the decision of the Court of Appeals, the
<PAGE>
determination of invalidity of the Claims at issue in the Pfaff v.
Wells case will become final. This determination will be binding
with respect to such Claims in the CTi v. Pfaff action in the
District of Arizona. The reasoning of the Pfaff v. Wells
decision, moreover, could support CTi's position that the
remaining Claims of that patent are invalid. This conclusion is
based on the Company's belief that the invention covered by such
remaining Claims was also "on sale" for more than a year before
the date of the application of the Pfaff Leadless Patent. If the
Supreme Court reverses the decision of the Court of Appeals, the
lower courts will then determine the validity of the Claims of the
Pfaff Leadless Patent at issue on other grounds and will determine
whether the products of Wells infringe on these Claims of the
Pfaff Leadless Patent. There can be no assurance that the Court
of Appeals decision will not be overturned or that the Company
will not be required to engage in further costly litigation
regarding the Pfaff Patents.
In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company, CTi
or Wells will prevail in any pending or future litigation. A
final court determination that CTi or Wells has infringed the
Pfaff Leadless Patent could have a material adverse effect on the
Company. Such adverse effect could include, without limitation,
the requirement that CTi or Wells pay substantial damages for
past infringement and an injunction against the manufacture or
sale in the United States of such products as are found to be
infringing. Approximately 18.5% of the revenues of the Company
(excluding Wells) for 1997 and approximately 7.0% of the revenues
of Wells for calendar year 1997 were derived from the sale of
products potentially at issue in the Pfaff cases. There can be no
assurance that the CTi and Wells litigation will be resolved
without material adverse effect on the financial condition,
results of operations and business of the Company.
COMPETITION. The electronic connector industry is highly
competitive and fragmented, with more than 2,000 manufacturers
worldwide. The Company believes that competition in its targeted
segments is primarily based on design, responsiveness, quality,
price, reputation and reliability. The Company has experienced
significant price pressure with respect to certain products,
including its thin, small outline package ("TSOP") product. The
Company's significant competitors are much larger and have
substantially broader product lines and greater financial
resources than the Company. There can be no assurance that the
Company will compete successfully, and any failure to compete
successfully would have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition, results of operations and business of the
Company.
<PAGE>
CONTROL BY EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS. Upon the completion of this
offering, the current officers, directors and Emerson Electric
Co. ("Emerson"), the Company's largest stockholder, will
beneficially own approximately 41.5% of the outstanding shares of
the Common Stock of the Company based on the number of shares of
Common Stock outstanding as of January 31, 1998. Accordingly,
such persons, if they act together, will have effective control
over the Company through their ability to control the election of
directors and all other matters that require action by the
Company's stockholders, irrespective of how other stockholders
may vote. Such persons could prevent or delay a change in control
of the Company which may be favored by a majority of the
remaining stockholders. Such ability to prevent or delay such a
change in control of the Company also may have an adverse effect
on the market price of the Company's Common Stock.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL. The Company is largely dependent
upon the skills and efforts of John L. Dwight, Jr., its Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Richard J.
Mullin, its Vice President and President, Wells - CTI Division,
Michael S. Cantor, its Vice President and General Manager,
Industrial/Avionics Division, Jeffrey A. Farnsworth, its Vice
President and General Manager, Wells - CTI Phoenix, and other
officers and key employees. The Company does not have employment
agreements with any of its officers or key employees providing
for their employment for any specific term or noncompetition
agreements prohibiting them from competing with the Company after
termination of their employment. The loss of key personnel or the
inability to hire or retain qualified personnel could have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the Company.
DEPENDENCE UPON INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTORS. Sales through
independent distributors accounted for 38.7%, 28.1% and 35.7% of
the net sales of the Company (excluding Wells) for the years
ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The
Company's agreements with its independent distributors are
nonexclusive and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days
written notice, provided that if the Company terminates the
agreement with an independent distributor, the Company will be
obligated to purchase certain of such distributor's pre-
designated unsold inventory shipped by the Company within an
agreed-upon period prior to the effective date of such
termination. The Company's distributors are not within the
control of the Company, are not obligated to purchase products
from the Company, and may also sell other lines of products.
<PAGE>
There can be no assurance that these distributors will continue
their current relationships with the Company or that they will
not give higher priority to the sale of other products, which
could include products of competitors. A reduction in sales
efforts or discontinuance of sales of the Company's products by
its distributors could lead to reduced sales and could materially
adversely affect the Company's financial condition, results of
operations and business. The Company grants to certain of its
distributors limited inventory return and stock rotation rights.
If the Company's distributors were to increase their general
levels of inventory of the Company's products, the Company could
face an increased risk of product returns from its distributors.
There can be no assurance that the Company's historical return
rate will remain at a low level in the future or that such
product returns will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial condition, results of operations and
business.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE COSTS. Many currently installed computer
systems and software products are coded to accept only two digit
entries in the date code field. To distinguish 21st century dates
from 20th century dates, these date code fields
must be able to accept four digit entries. The Company utilizes a
significant number of computer software programs and operating
systems across its entire organization, including applications
used in manufacturing, product development, financial business
systems and various administrative functions. The Company
believes that, with the exception of the South Bend, Indiana
location of Wells-CTI ("Wells-CTI South Bend"), its computer
systems will be able to manage and manipulate all material data
involving the transition from 1999 to 2000 without functional or
data abnormality and without inaccurate results related to such
data. However, there can be no assurances that potential systems
interruptions or the cost necessary to update software would not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition, results of operations or business. In addition, the
Company has limited information concerning the compliance status
of its suppliers and customers. In the event that any of the
Company's significant suppliers or customers do not successfully
and timely achieve Year 2000 compliance, the Company's financial
condition, results of operations and business could be materially
and adversely affected.
The Company believes that, within the next nine months, it
will have to replace the current systems at Wells-CTI South Bend
with new systems that are Year 2000 compliant. Failure to replace
<PAGE>
such systems could result in the generation of erroneous data or
system failure. Significant uncertainty exists concerning the
potential effects associated with Year 2000 compliance, and Year
2000 issues involving systems of Wells-CTI South Bend could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition,
results of operations or business. The cost of replacing computer
systems of Wells-CTI South Bend is currently estimated to be up
to $900,000.
PRODUCT LIABILITY. The Company's products provide electrical
connections between various electrical and electronic components.
Any failure by the Company's products could result in claims
against the Company. Except with respect to avionics products,
the Company does not maintain insurance to protect against
possible claims associated with the use of its products. A
successful claim brought against the Company could have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations and business of the Company. Even unsuccessful claims
could result in the Company's expenditure of funds in litigation
and management time and resources. There can be no assurance that
the Company will not be subject to product liability claims.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. The Company is subject to a wide
range of environmental laws and regulations relating to the use,
storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used
during its manufacturing process. A failure by the Company at any
time to comply with environmental laws and regulations could
subject it to liabilities or the suspension of production. Such
laws and regulations could also restrict the Company's ability to
expand its facilities or could require the Company to acquire
costly equipment or incur other significant expenses.
POSSIBLE VOLATILITY OF STOCK PRICE. The stock market
historically has experienced volatility which has affected the
market price of securities of many companies and which has
sometimes been unrelated to the operating performance of such
companies. The trading price of the Common Stock could also be
subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in
quarterly results of operations, announcements of new products by
the Company or its competitors, other developments or disputes
with respect to proprietary rights, general trends in the
industry, overall market conditions and other factors. In
addition, there can be no assurance that an active trading market
for the Common Stock will be sustained.
<PAGE>
POTENTIAL EFFECT OF ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS. The Company's
Board of Directors has the authority without action by the
Company's stockholders to fix the rights and preferences of and
to issue shares of the Company's Preferred Stock, which may have
the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in
control of the Company. At present the Company has no plans to
issue any shares of Preferred Stock. The Company's Board of
Directors also has the authority without action by the Company's
stockholders to impose various procedural and other requirements
that could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect
certain corporate actions. In addition, the classification of the
Company's Board of Directors and certain provisions of
Massachusetts law applicable or potentially applicable to the
Company, could have the effect of delaying, deterring or
preventing a change in control of the Company. These statutory
provisions include a requirement that directors of publicly-held
Massachusetts corporations may only be removed for "cause," as
well as a provision not currently applicable to the Company that
any stockholder who acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more
of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation may not vote
such stock unless the stockholders of the corporation so
authorize.
ITEM 2. FACILITIES
PCD, headquartered in Peabody, Massachusetts, operates leased
production facilities in Peabody, Massachusetts (60,000 square
feet) and Phoenix, Arizona (24,000 square feet). In conjunction
with the Wells acquisition, production facilities were added in
South Bend, Indiana (50,000 square feet), Yokohama, Japan (6,600
square feet) and Harrisburg (Swatara), Pennsylvania (7,000 square
feet). The Peabody facility is responsible for assembly,
manufacturing automation development and quality assurance
functions relating to industrial terminal blocks and avionics
terminal blocks. The Phoenix facility is responsible for assembly
and quality assurance functions relating to burn-in, development
and production sockets, as well as related product design and
development. The South Bend and Yokohama facilities are
responsible for design, assembly, manufacturing automation
development and quality assurance for burn-in sockets. Stamping
and molding fabrication of components for both Peabody and
Phoenix are handled at the Peabody facility. The Harrisburg
(Swatara) facility handles stamping for production in South Bend.
The Company also maintains distribution and technical sales
support facilities in Northhampton, England; Regensburg, Germany;
<PAGE>
Seoul, South Korea; Singapore and Penang, Malaysia. The Company
believes that its facilities are adequate for its operations for
the foreseeable future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On August 21, 1995, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, CTi
Technologies, Inc. ("CTi"), filed an action in the United States
District Court for the District of Arizona against Wayne K.
Pfaff, an individual residing in Texas ("Pfaff"), and Plastronics
Socket Company, Inc., a corporation affiliated with Pfaff,
alleging and seeking a declaratory judgment that two United
States patents issued to Pfaff and relating to certain burn-in
sockets for "leadless" IC packages (the "Pfaff Leadless Patent")
and ball grid array ("BGA") IC packages (the "Pfaff BGA Patent")
(collectively, the "Pfaff Patents") are invalid and are not
infringed by CTi, the products of which include burn-in sockets
for certain "leaded" packages (including Quad Flat Paks) (the
"CTi Leaded Products") and BGA packages (the "CTi BGA Products")
(collectively, the "CTi Products"). Pfaff has filed a
counterclaim alleging that CTi infringes the Pfaff Leadless
Patent and has requested an award of damages; the counterclaim
does not allege infringement of the Pfaff BGA Patent. Pfaff has
also sought a permanent injunction against further infringement
by CTi of the Pfaff Leadless Patent. That action has been stayed
pending resolution of another action, described below, involving
the Pfaff Leadless Patent.
In litigation between Wells and Pfaff concerning the Pfaff
Leadless Patent, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit has found all of the individual descriptions of
the invention (the "Claims" of the patent) of the Pfaff Leadless
Patent which were at issue in that case to be invalid. The basis
for the decision of the Court of Appeals was a finding that the
invention covered by the Pfaff Leadless Patent had been "on sale"
for more than one year before the filing of the patent
application. An invention that has been "on sale" for more than
one year before the filing of a patent application may not be
patented. Certain other Claims of the patent were not at issue in
the Pfaff v. Wells case, and their validity was not decided by the
Court of Appeals, because Pfaff did not allege that products of
Wells infringed such Claims. These other Claims include design
elements not incorporated into products of Wells or CTi, including
the use of contact pins formed with a pair of parallel blades
extending from a common base. The United States Supreme Court has
<PAGE>
accepted an appeal on the Pfaff v. Wells case, limited to the
question of whether the Pfaff Leadless Patent should have been
held invalid on the basis of the "on sale" bar if Pfaff's
invention was not "fully completed" more than one year before he
filed his patent application. The Supreme Court could affirm or
reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. If the Supreme
Court affirms the decision of the Court of Appeals, the
determination of invalidity of the Claims at issue in the Pfaff v.
Wells case will become final. This determination will be binding
with respect to such Claims in the CTi v. Pfaff action in the
District of Arizona. The reasoning of the Pfaff v. Wells decision,
moreover, could support CTi's position that the remaining Claims
of that patent are invalid. This conclusion is based on the
Company's belief that the invention covered by such remaining
Claims was also "on sale" for more than a year before the date of
the application of the Pfaff Leadless Patent. If the Supreme
Court reverses the decision of the Court of Appeals, the lower
courts will then determine the validity of the Claims of the Pfaff
Leadless Patent at issue on other grounds and will determine
whether the products of Wells infringe on these Claims of the
Pfaff Leadless Patent.
The Company believes, based on the advice of counsel (Brown &
Bain, P.A., as to CTi and Baker & Daniels as to Wells), that CTi
and Wells have meritorious defenses against any allegations of
infringement under the Pfaff Patents, and, if necessary, CTi and
Wells will vigorously litigate their positions. There can be no
assurance that the Company, CTi or Wells will prevail in any
pending or future litigation, and a final court determination that
CTi or Wells has infringed the Pfaff Leadless Patent could have a
material adverse effect on the Company. Such adverse effect could
include, without limitation, the requirement that CTi or Wells pay
substantial damages for past infringement and an injunction
against the manufacture or sale in the United States of such
products as are found to be infringing. Approximately 18.5% of
the revenues of the Company (excluding Wells) for 1997 and
approximately 7.0% of the revenues of Wells for calendar year 1997
were derived from the sale of products potentially at issue in the
Pfaff cases.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the
fourth quarter of 1997.
<PAGE>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Set forth below are the executive officers of the Company and
their ages as of December 31, 1997 and positions held with the
Company, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position
- --------------------- --- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
John L. Dwight, Jr... 53 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, President and Director
Richard J. Mullin.... 46 Vice President and President,
Wells-CTI Division
Michael S. Cantor.... 61 Vice President and General Manager,
Industrial/Avionics Division
Jeffrey A. Farnsworth 51 Vice President and General Manager
Wells-CTI Phoenix
Mary L. Mandarino.... 43 Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Roddy J. Powers...... 54 Vice President - Operations
</TABLE>
Mr. Dwight has served as Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company
since November 1980, when he purchased a controlling interest
in PCD. Mr. Dwight was previously Vice President -
International of Burndy Corporation, an electronic connector
manufacturer. Mr. Dwight has 27 years of management and
operating experience in the connector industry.
Mr. Mullin has served as Vice President and President,
Wells - CTI Division since December 1997. From June 1993 to
December 1997, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of
Wells. From May 1983 to June 1993, Mr. Mullin was Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wells. Before
joining Wells, Mr. Mullin was a CPA with Peat Marwick Mitchell
& Co. for nine years.
Mr. Cantor has served as Vice President and General
Manager, Industrial/Avionics Division since February 1998.
From July 1988 to February 1998, he was Vice President, Sales
and Marketing. Mr. Cantor joined the Company in 1983 and has
held various positions in management. From 1980 to 1983, Mr.
Cantor was President - U.S. Operations for Balteau S.A. and
from 1972 to 1980, Director of Regional Operations at Burndy
Corporation. Mr. Cantor has 37 years of experience in the
connector industry.
<PAGE>
Mr. Farnsworth has served as Vice President and the General
Manager, Wells - CTI Phoenix since December 1997. From October
1993 to December 1997, he was Vice President and General
Manager - CTi. Mr. Farnsworth was a founder of Component
Technologies, Inc. in 1983, and remained with the Company, in
various positions in sales and marketing, following the
acquisition of Component Technologies, Inc. by the Company in
1988. Mr. Farnsworth has 22 years of experience in the
connector industry.
Ms. Mandarino has served as Vice President, Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since
1989. Ms. Mandarino joined the Company in 1986 and has held
several positions of increasing responsibility in finance.
Prior to joining PCD, Ms. Mandarino held various financial
positions with American Brands, Inc. and Dresser Industries,
Inc.
Mr. Powers has served as Vice President, Operations since
he joined the Company in 1983. Previously, he was the General
Manager of the Incon Division of Transitron, which was
acquired by PCD.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a) The Company's Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq National
Market of the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. The following table
sets forth the reported high and low sale prices for the
Common Stock, under the symbol "PCDI," for the periods
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
------ ------
1997:
-----
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter.................................. 17-3/4 13
Second Quarter................................. 17-5/8 14
Third Quarter.................................. 25 16
Fourth Quarter................................. 26-1/2 19-1/2
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996:
-----
<S> <C> <C>
First Quarter (from March 27).................. 12-1/2 11(F1)
Second Quarter................................. 16 11-1/4
Third Quarter.................................. 13-3/4 10-1/8
Fourth Quarter................................. 13-7/8 10
</TABLE>
(F1) Initial public offering price per share.
On April 9, 1998, the last reported sale price for the
Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $20.00 per
share. As of January 31, 1998, there were approximately 800
holders of record of Common Stock.
The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends
on the Common Stock. The Company currently intends to retain
future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of
its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends
on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Board of
Directors of the Company intends to review this policy from
time to time, after taking into account various factors such
as the Company's financial condition, results of operation,
current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion.
The Senior Credit Facility contains a covenant that prohibits
the Company from paying cash dividends.
On December 26, 1997, the Company issued to Emerson
Electric Co. a subordinated debenture with a principal amount
of $25 million (convertible under certain circumstances into
Common Stock) and Common Stock purchase warrants for the
purchase of up to 525,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price of $1.00 per share. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" appearing in
Item 7 hereof. No underwriters were engaged in connection
with the foregoing sales of securities. Such sales were made
in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
(b) The Company's registration statement on Form S-1 (Commission
file no. 333-1266) relating to the initial public offering of
shares of the Company's common stock was declared effective by
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1996. On
July 3, 1997, the Company filed an amendment to its initial
<PAGE>
report on Form S-R covering the six-month period ended
June 26, 1997. On December 26, 1997, the Company applied all
of the net proceeds from its initial public offering
($11,253,000) towards payment of the purchase price of Wells
Electronics, Inc. See Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Wells
Acquisition appearing in Item 7 hereof. None of such payment
was made directly or indirectly to directors or officers of
the Company or their associates, or to persons owning 10
percent or more of any class of equity securities of the
Company, or to affiliates of the Company.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table contains certain selected consolidated
financial data for PCD and its subsidiaries (excluding Wells and
its subsidiaries, except as noted). The selected consolidated
financial data for each of the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 have been derived from the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been audited by
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent public accountants. The pro
forma statement of operations data for the year ended
December 31, 1997 give effect to the Wells acquisition assuming
such transaction occurred on January 1, 1997 and have been
derived from the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
The Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations Data are not
necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been
achieved had the Wells acquisition occurred at the beginning
1997, nor do they purport to indicate the results of operations
of the Company for any future period. The unaudited pro forma
Selected Consolidated Financial Data reflect a revised discount
attributed to the Emerson Warrant in the amount of $820,000 which
has the effect of increasing equity and reducing debt. There is
no impact on reported historical net income or total assets. Such
changes have not been reflected in the historical financial
statements because of immateriality and will be reflected
prospectively in the first quarter of 1998. The selected
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto of the
Company and of Wells appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations."
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pro Forma
1997(1)(2) 1997(3) 1996 1995 1994 1993
(in thousands, except percentages and per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
- -------------------------
Net sales........................ $ 71,386 $ 29,796 $ 26,857 $ 25,616 $ 15,850 $12,691
Gross profit..................... 41,024 14,676 12,400 12,139 6,016 4,197
Write-off of acquired in-process
research and development........ - (44,438) - - - -
Income (loss) from operations.... 21,710 (35,578) 6,955 6,472 2,157 867
Interest income (expense), net... (12,833) 940 725 112 23 1
Net income (loss) ............... $ 4,962 $(22,836) $ 4,786 $ 3,863 $ 1,301 $ 507
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Net income (loss) per share (3):
Basic.......................... $ 0.83 $ (3.83) $ 0.87 $ 0.85 $ 0.29 $ 0.11
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Diluted ....................... $ 0.73 $ (3.83) $ 0.76 $ 0.75 $ 0.29 $ 0.11
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares
outstanding (4):
Basic.......................... 5,955 5,955 5,478 4,570 4,561 4,561
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted........................ 6,769 5,955 6,292 5,184 4,561 4,567
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Other Data (5)(6)
- -----------------
Depreciation..................... 4,140 1,530 1,389 1,026 985 1,066
Amortization of intangible assets 4,209 - - - - -
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
------------------------------------------------
1997(3) 1996 1995 1994 1993
------- ------ ------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
- --------------------------------
Working capital (deficit)....... $(12,632) $23,054 $ 7,671 $ 5,089 $4,249
Total assets.................... 126,592 32,456 15,929 10,783 8,945
Total debt...................... 105,903 - - - 37
Stockholders' equity............ 8,995 28,706 12,812 8,774 7,473
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Gives effect to the Wells acquisition assuming such
transaction had occurred on January 1, 1997 and the
elimination of the related non-recurring acquired
in-process research and development expense and the
addition of the annual amortization of acquired intangible
assets so that the pro forma and the pro forma includes
only recurring costs. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations."
<PAGE>
(2) Before deducting the additional interest expense for the
value of the exercisable portion of the Emerson Warrant,
pro forma net income was approximately $6,762,000, pro
forma net income per share - basic was $1.14 (based on a
weighted average number of shares outstanding of 5,954,657)
and pro form net income per share - diluted was $1.00
(based on a weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding of 6,769,479).
(3) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1997 includes a
non-recurring write-off relating to the Wells acquisition
for acquired in-process research and development. Before
deducting the write-off, net income per share - basic was
$1.04 (based on a weighted average number of shares
outstanding of 5,954,657), and net income per share -
diluted was $0.94 (based on a weighted average number of
common and common equivalent shares outstanding of
6,634,125).
(4) See Note 2 to the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements for an explanation of the basis used to
Calculate net income (loss) per share.
(5) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization ("EBITDA") was $10.4 million, $8.3 million,
$7.5 million, $3.1 million, and $1.9 million for 1997,
1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. EBITDA includes
income from operations before deducting the non-recurring
write-off relating to the Wells acquisition for acquired
in-process research and development adjusted to exclude
depreciation and amortization of intangible assets. EBITDA
margin, which was 34.9%, 31.1%, 29.3%, 19.8%, and 15.2% for
1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively, is EBITDA
reflected as a percentage of net sales. The Company
believes that EBITDA and EBITDA margin provide additional
information to assist investors in determining its ability
to meet future debt service requirements. However, EBITDA
is not a defined term under generally accepted accounting
principles ("GAAP"), is not indicative of operating income
or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP and
may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported
by other companies.
<PAGE>
(6) Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.1 million,
$7.8 million, $5.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5
million for 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities was $132.9 million,
$1.9 million, $2.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.4 million
for 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively. Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities was $108.3
million, $10.7 million, $0.004 million, $(0.09) million and
$(0.4) million for 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table contains certain selected consolidated
financial data for Wells Electronics, Inc. The selected
consolidated financial data for each of the periods 34 weeks
ended December 26, 1997, 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996, and 52
weeks ended June 3, 1995, have been derived from the Wells
Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been audited by
KPMG Peat Marwick, independent public accountants. The selected
consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto of
Wells appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unaudited
34 Weeks 53 Weeks 48 Weeks 52 Weeks ----------------------
Ended Ended Ended Ended Year Ended Year Ended
December 26, May 3, April 27, June 3, May 28, May 29,
1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS DATA:
- ----------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................... $29,268 $27,492 $17,998 $18,579 $12,287 $11,696
Gross profit................. 19,007 14,311 8,727 8,847 3,964 4,370
Income (loss) from operations 11,584 5,553 2,103 1,575 (642) (944)
Non-operating income, net.... 330 783 735 66 154 518
Net income (loss) ........... $ 6,269 $ 4,367 $ 2,252 $ 843 $ (386) $ (432)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share(1):
Basic...................... $801.15 $558.08 $287.80 $107.73 $(49.33) $(55.21)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted.................... $801.15 $558.08 $287.80 $107.73 $(49.33) $(55.21)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Weighted average number of common
and common equivalent shares:
Basic...................... 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted.................... 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825 7,825
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 26, May 3, April 27, June 3, May 28, May 29,
1997 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------ ------- --------- ------- ------- -------
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
<C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Working capital (deficit).... $ 757 $ 2,085 $ 2,679 $ 1,547 $ 1,860 $ (279)
Total assets................. 27,542 30,785 13,913 11,494 8,629 8,743
Total debt................... 18 268 2,611 1,699 1,458 1,301
Stockholders' equity......... 13,841 18,641 6,333 4,354 2,884 3,273
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) See Note 2 of Notes to Wells' Consolidated Financial Statements for an
explanation of the basis used to calculate net income (loss) per share.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
On December 26, 1997, pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement
dated November 17, 1997, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding common stock of Wells Electronics, Inc. ("Wells") for
approximately $130 million in cash. The Company also incurred
approximately $1.2 million in acquisition related costs resulting
in a total purchase price of approximately $131.2 million. The
acquisition was financed by a combination of a new bank credit
facility of $90 million of which the Company borrowed
approximately $83 million upon consummation of the acquisition
and a $25 million subordinated debenture issued to Emerson.
The acquisition is being accounted for as a purchase, and the
Company has allocated the purchase price based on the fair value
of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. A significant portion
of the purchase price has been allocated as intangible assets
using proven valuation procedures and techniques, including
approximately $44 million of acquired in-process research and
development.
The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the 12 months ended December 31, 1997
assumes that the acquisition of Wells took place on January 1,
1997.
The accompanying pro forma information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
the financial position or results of operations which would
actually have been reported had the acquisition been in effect
during the periods presented, or which may be reported in the
future.
<PAGE>
The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations should be read in conjunction with the historical financial
statements and related notes thereto for PCD and for Wells that appear
elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The unaudited pro forma Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations reflects a revised discount attributed to the Emerson
Warrant in the amount of $820,000 which has the effect of increasing equity and
reducing debt. There is no impact on reported historical net income or total
assets. Such changes have not been reflected in the historical financial
statements because of immateriality and will be reflected prospectively in the
first quarter of 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 1997
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
PCD Wells Pro Forma Pro Forma
Dec 31, Dec 31, Adjustments Combined(1)
------- ------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.................. $ 29,796 $41,590 $71,386
Cost of sales.............. 15,120 15,242 30,362
-------- ------- -------- -------
Gross profit............. 14,676 26,348 41,024
Operating expenses,
excluding amortization.... 5,816 9,289 15,105
Write -off of acquired
in process research and
development............... 44,438 - $(44,438)(2)
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets......... - 484 3,725(3) 4,209
-------- ------- -------- -------
Income (loss)
from operations........... (35,578) 16,575 40,713 21,710
Interest and other income.. 1,167 (1,067)(4) 100
Interest expense........... (227) (8) (12,698) (12,933)
-------- ------- -------- -------
Income (loss) before
provisions for
income taxes.............. (34,638) 16,567 26,948 8,877
Provisions (benefit) for
income taxes.............. (11,802) 7,157 8,560 3,915
-------- ------- -------- -------
Net income (loss) before
non-recurring item and
extraordinary loss........ $(22,836) $ 9,410 $ 18,388 $ 4,962
======== ======= ======== =======
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic.................... $ (3.83) $ 0.83
======== =======
Diluted.................. $ (3.83) $ 0.73
======== =======
Weighted average number of
common and common
equivalent shares
outstanding:
Basic.................... 5,955 5,955
======== =======
Diluted.................. 5,955 6,769
======== =======
</TABLE>
- ----------
<PAGE>
(1) Before deducting the additional interest expense for the value of the
exercisable portion of the Emerson Warrant, pro forma net income combined was
approximately $6,762,000, pro forma net income combined per share-basic was
$1.14 (based on a weighted average number of shares outstanding of 5,954,657)
and pro forma net income combined per share-diluted was $1.00 (based on a
weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding of
6,769,479).
(2) Reflects the elimination of non-recurring acquired in-process research
and development relating to the Wells acquisition so that the pro forma
combined statement of operations includes only recurring costs.
(3) Includes amortization of intangible assets as a result of the Wells
acquisition consisting of 20 years for goodwill, trademarks and trade names and
6 years for patented technologies to reflect a full year's charge.
(4) Represents a reduction of interest income as a result of utilizing cash
and cash equivalents for the Wells acquisition.
(5) Includes interest expense on debt issued to finance the Wells
acquisition, at an assumed weighted average rate of 8.96% for the Senior
Credit Facility and at 10% for the subordinated debenture and additional
interest expense of $3.0 million representing the interest expense of the
exercisable portion of the Emerson Warrant. A 1/8 percent change in the
interest rate of the Senior Credit Facility results in a change of $103,750.
(6) Reflects the related tax effect of adjustments (2) through (5). A
portion of the approximately $44 million of in-process research and
development charge is not deductible in Japanese tax jurisdictions. The
remainder of the adjustments are included at a 39% rate.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
which involve risks and uncertainties. The Company's actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors,
including, without limitation, those set forth under "Business -
Forward Looking Information" in Item 1 hereof and elsewhere in
this report.
As used herein, the terms "Company" and "PCD," unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, refer to
PCD Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Wells Electronics, Inc.
and its subsidiaries ("Wells"). However, all financial
information for periods ended before December 26, 1997, unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, is for PCD
Inc. and its subsidiaries, excluding Wells.
<PAGE>
OVERVIEW
PCD designs, manufactures and markets electronic connectors
for use in integrated circuit ("IC") package interconnect
applications, industrial equipment and avionics. Electronic
connectors, which enable an electrical current or signal to pass
from one element to another within an electronic system, range
from minute individual connections within an IC to rugged,
multiple lead connectors that couple various types of
electrical/electronic equipment.
The Company was founded in 1976 and the current chairman, John
L. Dwight, Jr., acquired a controlling interest in 1980. Over the
years, the Company has made a number of strategic acquisitions
and investments to both bolster existing product lines and expand
into selected key markets. The most significant of these
acquisitions were: (i) the 1997 acquisition of the common stock
of Wells Electronics, Inc. ("Wells") from UL America, Inc., an
indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Siebe plc; (ii) the 1988
acquisition of the assets of Component Technologies, Inc.; and
(iii) the 1983 acquisition of the Appleton Electronics product
line from Emerson Electric Co. In 1996, the Company completed an
initial public offering of its Common Stock.
In 1995, net sales of the Company (excluding Wells) were
$25.6 million and grew to $29.8 million in 1997, and after giving
effect to the Wells acquisition the Company's net sales in 1997
were $71.4 million on a pro forma basis. The Company (excluding
Wells) realized approximately 46.7% of its net sales in 1997 from
products introduced in the last five years. The Company
distributes its products through a combination of its own
dedicated direct sales forces, a worldwide network of
manufacturers representatives and authorized distributors. Sales
to customers located outside the United States, either directly
or through U.S. and foreign distributors, accounted for
approximately 35.8%, 22.1% and 28.1% of the net sales of the
Company in the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, and the Company believes that, with the addition of
Wells, international sales will account for a significant portion
of its revenues for the foreseeable future.
The following table sets forth the relative percentages of the
total net sales of the Company attributable to each of the
Company's product categories for the periods indicated.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
Pro Forma
1997(1) 1997 1996 1995
--------- ------ ------ ------
Product Categories
- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
IC package interconnects..... 75.9% 42.3% 37.6% 52.7%
Industrial interconnects..... 10.2 24.5 22.5 16.5
Avionics terminal
blocks and sockets.......... 13.9 33.2 39.9 30.8
------ ------ ------ ------
Total................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE
(1) Gives effect to the Wells acquisition assuming such
transaction had occurred on January 1, 1997.
- ----------
WELLS ACQUISITION
On December 26, 1997, the Company purchased Wells (the "Wells
acquisition"). The acquisition significantly expanded the
Company's product offerings in the IC package interconnect
category and added principal facilities in South Bend, Indiana
and Yokohama, Japan, as well as technical support operations in
Regensburg, Germany and Penang, Malaysia, sales offices in San
Jose, California; Northhampton, England; Seoul, South Korea and
Singapore, and a stamping facility in Harrisburg (Swatara),
Pennsylvania. In combining the existing IC package interconnect
business of PCD with that of Wells, the Company now supports
complete design, development, manufacturing and marketing of test
and burn-in sockets in two of the world's largest IC package
interconnect markets: the United States and Japan. Wells was
acquired for access to its burn-in technology and customer base.
The purchase price for Wells was $130 million in cash and the
Company incurred approximately $1.2 million in acquisition
related costs resulting in a total purchase price of
approximately $131.2 million. The acquisition is being accounted
<PAGE>
for as a purchase in accordance with APB Opinion No. 16. The
purchase price was allocated to acquired net tangible assets
($11.5 million), patented technologies ($3.1 million), trade
names/trademarks ($10.4 million), in-process research and
development ($44.4 million) and goodwill ($61.7 million).
The goodwill and trade names have estimated useful lives of 20
years based on Wells' long-term established position in the
industry. Wells is an established product developer and
manufacturer with over 40 years of manufacturing experience and
20-year presence in the IC package market. The ability of Wells
to compete in the IC package industry is in part derived from its
reputation, worldwide locations, and the associated trade name it
has developed over the past several decades. Wells, through its
close working relationships with its customers, has demonstrated
an ability to respond to the evolving product packaging demands
and corresponding technological requirements. In the IC package
industry, new product development is often linked with customers'
packaging requirements. Close interaction between Wells and the
customers' engineering staff allows Wells to effectively respond
to needs for product designs.
The Company has utilized the income approach for valuation,
which values an asset on future cash flows that accrue to the
owner of the asset. Specifically, the Company used the "relief
from royalty" approach to the valuation of acquired patented
technologies, trademarks and trade names. For patented
technologies, there are generally no additional investments
required to achieve economic benefits for these assets which
represent specific, discrete intangibles that are in demand in the
marketplace as reflected by the royalties that they can command.
Thus, it is common practice in the valuation of patented
technologies to use the relief from royalty approach, an
adaptation of the income approach, based on a future stream of
hypothetical after-tax royalty payments based on market derived
royalty rates. For the valuation of the patented technologies
acquired from Wells, the Company used royalty rates ranging from 1
to 4 percent with the relief from royalty methodology. This range
reflects market-based royalty rates as estimated by the Company.
The cash flows reflect after-tax royalty expense that does not
need to be incurred due to the Company's ownership of the patented
technologies.
For the valuation of in-process research and development
("IPR&D"), the Company has applied an income approach. IPR&D
programs typically apply a broad array of a firm's proprietary
<PAGE>
know-how, development skills and trade secrets as well as patented
technologies. For proprietary unpatented technologies, there may
be no observable market-based royalty rates that could be
considered so that a relief from royalty approach can be utilized
for valuation. Thus, the methodology that is typically used for
valuing IPR&D is the income or discounted cash flow approach. In
effect, an IPR&D program is considered to be a stand-alone
"business" that, assuming technological feasibility is reached,
will generate future revenues and profits. The income approach
considers that in order to achieve these revenues and profits,
interim development and testing costs must be borne and capital
investments made. The income approach reflects both of these
requirements in valuing an IPR&D program by computing the specific
net cash inflows and outflows directly attributable to such
program. These considerations necessitate the income approach
that the Company has used in its valuation of IPR&D. The income
approach also incorporates higher discount rates (applied to
future cash flows) than those used in the valuation of the
patented technologies. These higher discount rates reflect the
relative riskiness of each particular IPR&D program. The IPR&D
programs represent potential new technologies that are expected to
achieve higher margins and facilitate broader product offerings.
The patented technologies reflect the products built upon
established technology, with an average remaining economic life of
six years. The Company believes that a shorter economic life for
the acquired technology assets versus the lives of the goodwill
and trade names is appropriate given the changing technological
needs of its customers. Continued application of these patented
technologies is expected to result in next generation products and
platforms.
Approximately $44.4 million of the purchase price premium was
written off as acquired IPR&D with no alternative future use as a
non-recurring write-off charged to operations at the acquisition
date. The acquired IPR&D relates to in-process burn-in socket
designs and manufacturing process for the next generation high
density IC packaging, involving a number of projects in various
package types. More specifically, there are six projects for
dual-sided surface mount ("SO") packages, six for chip scale
packages ("CSP"), three for lan grid array ("LGA"), two for ball
grid array ("BGA"), two for test sockets and one for a
miscellaneous package. The aggregate completion costs for these
IPR&D programs are expected to be approximately $3.7 million. The
Company intends to further develop the IPR&D projects and expects
either successful completion or abandonment of the projects within
<PAGE>
24 months of the acquisition. Among these projects, the Company
believes that the greatest risk of failure to achieve successful
completion relates to the LGA package, followed by the SO and CSP
packages. The Company recognizes that the development of the
IPR&D involves certain risks such as failure of one or more of the
critical technologies to function according to specifications or
customer rejection, which may prevent these projects from reaching
technological feasibility. The Company expects the economic lives
of the IPR&D projects to range from five to eight years, if
technological feasibility is reached. The SO packages are expected
to have the shortest economic lives, approximately five years,
while the CSP packages are expected to have the longest economic
lives, approximately eight years. Failure to successfully develop
the IPR&D projects would negatively impact the Company's future
performance and its ability to compete in the burn-in socket
market.
Wells has not had significant historical research and
development expense due to highly focused and customer driven
product development that generally related to a specific product
or next generation platforms. Often, successful projects are able
to be commercialized into major product lines, as demonstrated by
recent sales results. Wells is in the process of developing
significant next generation product programs with major
customers.
Prior to the acquisition of Wells by the Company, Wells was a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Siebe, having been purchased in May
1996 as part of Siebe's strategic acquisition of Unitech plc. The
stated objective of Siebe's purchase of Unitech was to combine
the two companies' power supply and control operations. Wells, a
small non-strategic and non-core subsidiary of Unitech,
represented less than 5% of the total purchase consideration.
Subsequent to the acquisition by Siebe, Wells grew substantially
and expanded its customer base, product lines and product
development processes.
The acquisition was financed by a combination of a new bank
credit facility of $90 million, of which the Company borrowed
approximately $83 million at consummation of the acquisition, a
$25 million subordinated debenture issued to Emerson and the
Company's existing cash and short term investments.
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. FOR FISCAL 1997
(53 WEEKS ENDED MAY 3, 1997) AND FISCAL 1996 (48 WEEKS ENDED
APRIL 27, 1996); AND THE PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1997 (34
WEEKS ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1997) AND DECEMBER 31, 1996 (35 WEEKS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996)
NET SALES. Net sales increased approximately 53% to $27.5
million for fiscal 1997, from $18.0 million for fiscal 1996. This
change in net sales reflected increased market penetration of
Wells' burn-in products on an overall business basis. Wells'
largest customer accounted for approximately 12% of the 53%
increase in net sales. In addition, net sales of Wells' TSOP
(thin small-outline package) product line increased significantly
as volume shipments began to a major new customer. For the 34
week period ended December 26, 1997, net sales increased
approximately 89%, to $29.3 million from $15.5 million for the 35
week period ended December 31, 1996. Shipments to Wells' three
largest customers during the 34 week period ended December 26,
1997 accounted for $15.6 million, or 53% of the net sales for
that period.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased 64% to $14.3 million for
fiscal 1997, from $8.7 million for fiscal 1996. As a percentage
of net sales, gross margin increased to 52.1% for fiscal 1997
from 48.5% for fiscal 1996. This increase in gross margin was
attributable to a shift in product mix to Wells' TSOP and IPGA
product lines and increased manufacturing and labor efficiencies
resulting from the higher sales volume. For the 34 week period
ended December 26, 1997, gross profit increased approximately
171%, to $19.0 million from $7.0 million for the 35 week period
ended December 31, 1996. As a percentage of net sales, gross
margin increased to 64.9% for the 34 week period ended December
26, 1997 from 45.2% for the 35 week period ended December 31,
1996. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to the
increase in sales volume resulting in a shift in product mix
defined above and improved overhead absorption via improved
manufacturing and labor efficiencies.
OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses were $8.8 million, or
31.9% of net sales for fiscal 1997 compared to $6.6 million, or
36.8% of net sales for fiscal 1996. Accounting for this change
were higher salaries and related expenses, increased commissions
due to the higher sales volume and increased product engineering
costs. For the 34 week period ended December 26, 1997, operating
expenses were $7.4 million, or 25.4% of net sales, compared to
$5.2 million, or 33.9% of net sales for the 35 week period ended
<PAGE>
December 31, 1996. Accounting for this change were higher
salaries and related expenses, higher product repair expenses,
increased commission expense due to the higher sales volume and
expansion costs into Europe and Texas.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The effective tax rate was 31.1%
for fiscal 1997 compared to 20.6% for fiscal 1996. The difference
was due primarily to a rate benefit taken by Wells for fiscal
1996 with respect to a reduction in the valuation allowance, as
well as differing effective state tax rates. The effective tax
rate was 47.4% for the 34 week period ended December 26, 1997
compared to 28.3% for the 35 week period ended December 31, 1996.
This change reflects the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards in 1996 that were not available in 1997.
The gross profit margin for PCD (excluding Wells) for the year
ended December 31, 1997 was 49.3%. The gross profit margin for
Wells for the fiscal year ended May 3, 1997 was 52.1%. The gross
profit margin for Wells for the 12 months ended December 31, 1997
was 63.4%. The difference in gross profit margin between PCD's
and Wells' historical results are related to the different
markets that PCD serves versus Wells and the rapid escalation of
net sales volume that Wells experienced during the above
referenced periods. Operating expenses (excluding a write-off of
acquired in-process research and development expense relating to
the Wells acquisition) for PCD (excluding Wells) for the year
ended December 31, 1997 was 19.5%. Operating expenses for Wells
for fiscal 1997 was 31.9%. Operating expenses for Wells for the
12 months ended December 31, 1997 was 23.5%. The difference in
operating expenses between PCD's and Wells' historical results
are related to the costs associated with the sales and technical
support facilities established by Wells to support the growing
international markets for IC package interconnect sockets. Wells
maintained an overall effective tax rate equal to 31.1% for the
period ended May 3, 1997 compared to a 34.1% overall effective
tax rate provided by PCD for the year ended December 31, 1997.
The difference was due primarily to a rate benefit taken by Wells
with respect to a reduction in the valuation allowance, as well
as differing effective state tax rates.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain Consolidated Statements
of Income data and other data as a percentage of net sales for
the periods indicated. The table and the discussion below should
<PAGE>
be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Notes thereto for the Company (excluding Wells) and for Wells
that appear elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
Pro Forma
1997(1) 1997(2) 1996 1995
--------- ------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales..................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Gross profit.................. 57.5 49.3 46.2 47.4
Write-off of acquired
in-process research
and development.............. - (149.1) - -
Income (loss) from operations. 30.4 (119.4) 25.9 25.3
Interest income (expense), net (18.0) 3.2 2.7 0.4
Net income (loss) ............ 7.0 (76.6) 17.8 15.1
- ------------------
(1) Gives effect to the Wells acquisition assuming such
transaction had occurred on January 1, 1997 and the
elimination of the related non-recurring acquired
in-process research and development and the addition of
the annual amortization of acquired intangible assets so
that the pro forma and the pro forma as adjusted include
only recurring costs. See "Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
(2) Net loss for the year ended December 31, 1997 includes a
non-recurring write-off relating to the Wells acquisition
for acquired in-process research and development.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND DECEMBER 31, 1996
NET SALES. Net sales increased 10.8% to $29.8 million for
1997, from $26.9 million for 1996. This change in net sales
reflected increased market penetration of the Company's IC
package interconnects and industrial interconnects. The greatest
portion of this growth was derived from higher sales volume of
the IC package sockets, particularly the ball grid array ("BGA")
burn-in sockets. Sales of this product family, which was <PAGE>
introduced in the fourth quarter of 1996, grew to approximately
$1.6 million in 1997 from $163,000 in 1996. The industrial
interconnect line was also favorably impacted by new product
<PAGE>
introductions. Sales of the high-density terminal block line,
which was introduced in late 1995, grew to approximately $765,000
in 1997 from $223,000 in 1996. Sales to customers located outside
the United States, either directly or through U.S. and foreign
distributors, were 35.8% of net sales in 1997, compared with
22.1% of net sales in 1996.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased 18.4% to $14.7 million
for 1997, from $12.4 million for 1996. As a percentage of net
sales, gross margin increased to 49.3% for 1997 from 46.2% for
1996. The increase in gross margin was attributable to a shift in
product mix back to IC packaging interconnects from industrial
interconnects and avionics terminal blocks and sockets, higher
sales volume and cost improvements resulting from the Company's
continuous cost reduction program.
OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses include selling,
general and administrative expenses and costs of product
development. Operating expenses, excluding a write-off of
acquired in-process research and development from the Wells
acquisition, were $5.8 million, or 19.5% of net sales, for 1997,
compared to $5.4 million, or 20.3% of net sales, for 1996. This
dollar increase in operating expenses reflects the costs
associated with the start-up of the Control Systems Interconnect
division in the third quarter of 1997 as well as the costs
associated with the advertising campaign to promote the
production BGA Z-Lok(TM) product family.
WRITE-OFF OF ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
The non-recurring write-off of approximately $44.0 million of
acquired in-process research and development was recorded in
connection with the Wells acquisition. The amount of in-process
research and development was determined by identifying product
development projects at Wells that were based on technologies
that were considered incomplete or in-process. The remaining
goodwill and purchased intangibles will be amortized over 6 to 20
years, which will increase operating expenses by approximately
$4.2 million per year. PCD selected a 20 year life for goodwill
and intangibles based on connector industry norms and the wide
array of technologies, services and capabilities required to
successfully compete in the burn-in market. Wells is an
established manufacturer in this market with over 20 years
experience.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Interest and other
income increased to $1.2 million in 1997 from $734,000 in 1996.
<PAGE>
This increase was attributable to the higher balances of cash and
cash equivalents during 1997. Interest expense increased to
approximately $227,000 in 1997, reflecting the debt incurred in
connection with the Wells acquisition. The Company expects
interest expense to increase substantially in 1998. See "-
Liquidity and Capital Resources."
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The effective tax rate for 1997
was approximately 34.1%, compared to 37.7% in 1996. The decrease
in the effective tax rate for 1997 resulted primarily from the
write-off of acquired in-process research and development
relating to the Wells acquisition. Before taking into
consideration the write-off of acquired in-process research and
development, the Company's effective tax rate was 36.6%.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND DECEMBER 31, 1995
NET SALES. Net sales increased 4.8% to $26.9 million for 1996
from $25.6 million for 1995. This increase in net sales reflected
overall market growth and increased market penetration <PAGE>
of the Company's product lines. The greatest portion of this
growth was derived from higher volume in the industrial
interconnects and avionics terminal block and socket categories.
The IC package interconnect product category declined due to the
volatility within the IC package market. Sales to customers
located outside the United States, either directly or through
U.S. and foreign distributors, were 22.1% of net sales in 1996,
compared with 28.1% of net sales in 1995.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased 2.2% to $12.4 million
for 1996 from $12.1 million for 1995. As a percentage of net
sales, gross margin decreased from 47.4% in 1995 to 46.2% for
1996. This decrease in gross margin was attributable to a shift
in product mix from IC packaging interconnects to industrial
interconnects and avionics terminal blocks and sockets and a one-
time expense for a design change to a nonstandard product in the
IC package interconnect category. This decline was partially
offset by increased manufacturing and labor efficiencies
resulting from higher sales volume and the best cost producer
program.
OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses decreased by $222,000,
to $5.4 million, or 20.3% of net sales, for 1996, compared to
$5.7 million, or 22.1% of net sales, for 1995. This decrease in
operating expenses is the result of having recorded professional
fees in 1995 associated with pending patent litigation, partially
<PAGE>
offset by increased expenses in 1996 resulting from the Company's
status as a publicly traded company.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET. Interest and other
income was $725,000 in 1996, compared to $112,000 for 1995. The
increase was attributable to the interest earned on the proceeds
from the Company's initial public stock offering.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. The effective tax rate for 1996
was approximately 37.7%, compared to 41.3% for 1995. This
decrease in the effective tax rate for 1996 was due to the
application of the appropriate effective tax rates for each of
the state tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. In
addition, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary which
was engaged in holding PCD securities. This corporate structure
allowed for a favorable treatment of passive income in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash provided by operating activities in 1997 was
$8.1 million, compared to $7.8 million in 1996. These funds were
sufficient to meet increased working capital needs and capital
expenditures of approximately $2.5 million. The Company currently
anticipates that its capital expenditures for 1998 will be
approximately $7 million, which consists primarily of purchased
tooling and equipment required to support the Company's business.
The amount of these anticipated capital expenditures will
frequently change based on future changes in business plans and
conditions of the Company and changes in economic conditions.
In December 1997, the Company obtained a Senior Credit
Facility for $90 million from Fleet National Bank and other
lenders (the "Senior Credit Facility") to finance in part the
Wells acquisition. The Senior Credit Facility is secured by all
of the assets of the Company. In conjunction with the Senior
Credit Facility, PCD and Wells each entered into a stock pledge
agreement with Fleet and the other lenders pledging all or
substantially all of the stock of the subsidiaries of PCD and
Wells. Each of PCD, Wells and certain of their subsidiaries also
entered into a security agreement and certain other collateral or
conditional assignments of assets with Fleet and other lenders.
Interest on loans outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility
is, at the Company's election, payable at either (i) the higher
of the lender's base rate, or a rate equal to 1/2 of 1% per annum
<PAGE>
above the weighted average of the rates on overnight federal
funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System
arranged by federal funds brokers plus between 25 and 200 basis
points based on the ratio of senior indebtedness to earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"),
or (ii) a periodic fixed rate equal to Libor plus between 150 and
325 basis points based on the ratio of senior indebtedness to
EBITDA. In addition, the Company obtained $25 million in
subordinated debt financing from Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson")
pursuant to a Subordinated Debenture (the "Debenture") issued to
Emerson. Interest on the Debenture is 10% per annum plus the
issuance of the Emerson Warrant which is exercisable for 525,000
shares of Common Stock of the Company, as follows: (i) the
Emerson Warrant is currently exercisable for 150,000 shares of
common stock; (ii) if the principal of and accrued interest and
costs and expenses under the Debenture have not been paid in full
at the close of business on December 31, 1998, the Emerson
Warrant shall be exercisable for an additional 225,000 shares of
Common Stock; and (iii) if the principal of and accrued interest
and costs and expenses under the Debenture have not been paid in
full at the close of business on December 31, 1999, the Emerson
Warrant shall be exercisable for an additional 150,000 shares of
Common Stock. The combined effective interest rate for the
Debenture, the exercisable portion of the Emerson Warrant and the
prepayment penalty is 55.2% as the Debenture is expected to be
repaid approximately four months after the date of issuance. The
individual components of this effective interest rate are (i) 10%
per annum direct interest expense; (ii) 35.4% effective interest
expense associated with the value of the Emerson Warrant; and
(iii) 9.8% of effective interest expense due to prepayment
penalties. Prepayment of the principal amount under the Debenture
is subject to a penalty, due at the time of prepayment, as
follows: (i) for the period beginning on December 26, 1997 and
ending June 30, 1998, an amount equal to 3.25% of the principal
sum prepaid; (ii) for the period beginning July 1, 1998 and ending
September 30, 1998, an amount equal to 6.5% of the principal sum
prepaid; and (iii) for the period beginning October 1, 1998 and
ending December 31, 1998, an amount equal to 9.75% of the
principal sum prepaid. The Debenture is convertible into Common
Stock of the Company, at Emerson's election, upon the occurrence
of an Event of Default. The Events of Default under the Debenture
are (i) insolvency; (ii) default under the Senior Credit Facility;
(iii) a payment default on the Debenture which default is not
cured within 10 business days; (iv) a material breach by the
Company of any representations or warranties or failure to comply
with covenants or agreements contained in the agreements with
<PAGE>
Emerson which breach is not cured within 30 days; and (v) an
undischarged or unstayed judgment against the Company for an
amount in excess of $1 million. The Senior Credit Facility will
terminate over a period of six to seven years. The Company expects
to use the net proceeds from this offering to repay (i) 100% of
the Debenture held by Emerson and (ii) a portion of the
outstanding balance on the Senior Credit Facility.
The Company believes its existing working capital and
borrowing capacity, coupled with the funds generated from the
Company's operations, will be sufficient to fund its anticipated
working capital, capital expenditure and debt payment
requirements through 1999. Because the Company's capital
requirements cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no
assurance that any additional financing will be available on
terms satisfactory to the Company or not disadvantageous to the
Company's stockholders, including those purchasing Common Stock
in this offering.
INFLATION AND COSTS
The cost of the Company's products is influenced by the cost
of a wide variety of raw materials, including precious metals
such as gold used in plating, copper and brass used for contacts,
and plastic material used in molding connector components. In the
past, increases in the cost of raw materials, labor and services
have been offset by price increases, productivity improvements
and cost saving programs. There can be no assurance, however,
that the Company will be able to similarly offset such cost
increases in the future.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE COSTS
Many currently installed computer systems and software
products are coded to accept only two digit entries in the date
code field. To distinguish 21st century dates from 20th century
dates, these date code fields must be able to accept four digit
entries. The Company utilizes a significant number of computer
software programs and operating systems across its entire
organization, including applications used in manufacturing,
product development, financial business systems and various
administrative functions. The Company believes that, with the
exception of the South Bend, Indiana location of Wells-CTI
("Wells-CTI South Bend"), its computer systems will be able to
manage and manipulate all material data involving the transition
from 1999 to 2000 without functional or data abnormality and
<PAGE>
without inaccurate results related to such data. However, there
can be no assurances that potential systems interruptions or the
cost necessary to update software would not have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of
operations or business. In addition, the Company has limited
information concerning the compliance status of its suppliers and
customers. In the event that any of the Company's significant
suppliers or customers do not successfully and timely achieve
Year 2000 compliance, the Company's financial condition, results
of operations and business could be adversely affected.
The Company believes that, within the next nine months, it
will have to replace the current systems at Wells-CTI South Bend
with new systems that are Year 2000 compliant. Failure to replace
such systems could result in the generation of erroneous data or
system failure. Significant uncertainty exists concerning the
potential effects associated with Year 2000 compliance, and Year
2000 issues involving systems of Wells-CTI South Bend could have a
material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition,
results of operations or business. The cost of replacing computer
systems of Wells-CTI South Bend is currently estimated to be up to
$900,000.
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PCD INC.
December 31, 1997 and 1996
Report of Independent Accountants
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.
MAY 3, 1997 and APRIL 27, 1996
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 3, 1997 and April 27, 1996
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 53 weeks ended May 3, 1997, the
48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the 53 weeks ended May
3, 1997, 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 53 weeks ended May 3, 1997,
48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.
DECEMBER 26, 1997
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 26, 1997 and
December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 34 weeks ended December 26,
1997 and 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the 34 weeks
ended December 26, 1997
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 34 weeks ended December
26, 1997 and the 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of PCD Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of PCD Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of PCD Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Boston, Massachusetts
February 11, 1998, except information included under the caption
Litigation in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, as to which
the date is April 13, 1998.
<PAGE>
PCD Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------
1997 1996
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents....................... $ 3,990 $20,529
Accounts receivable - trade (less allowance
for uncollectible accounts of $205 in
1997 and $232 in 1996).................... 6,804 3,578
Inventory....................................... 4,796 2,608
Prepaid expenses and other current assets....... 1,135 89
-------- -------
Total current assets.......................... 16,725 26,804
Equipment and improvements, net................... 15,843 5,337
Deferred tax asset................................ 15,335 82
Goodwill.......................................... 61,718 -
Intangible assets................................. 13,539 -
Debt financing fees............................... 1,800 -
Other assets...................................... 1,632 233
-------- -------
Total assets...................................... $126,592 $32,456
======== =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt and current portion
Of long-term debt............................. $ 17,700
Accounts payable - trade........................ 4,213 $ 627
Accrued liabilities............................. 7,444 3,123
-------- -------
Total current liabilities..................... 29,357 3,750
Long-term debt, net of current portion............ 65,300 -
Subordinated debenture - related party............ 22,903 -
Minority interest................................. 37 -
-------- -------
Total liabilities............................... 117,597 3,750
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)............ - -
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - $0.10 par value;
1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
Common stock - $0.01 par value;
25,000,000 shares authorized, 6,020,182
shares issued in 1997 and 5,854,733 shares
issued in 1996.................................. 60 59
Additional paid-in capital........................ 17,904 14,838
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)........... (8,930) 13,906
Deferred compensation............................. (39) (97)
-------- -------
Total stockholders' equity........................ 8,995 28,706
-------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........ $126,592 $32,456
======== =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statement
<PAGE>
PCD Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
-----------------------------
1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales..................................... $29,796 $26,857 $25,616
Cost of sales................................. 15,120 14,457 13,477
-------- ------- -------
Gross profit.................................. 14,676 12,400 12,139
Operating expenses............................ 5,816 5,445 5,667
Acquired in-process research and development.. 44,438 - -
-------- ------- -------
Income (loss) from operations................. (35,578) 6,955 6,472
Interest and other income..................... 1,167 734 125
Interest expense.............................. (227) (9) (13)
-------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes.................... (34,638) 7,680 6,584
Provision for (benefit) income taxes.......... (11,802) 2,895 2,721
-------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)............................. $(22,836) $ 4,785 $ 3,863
======== ======= =======
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic....................................... $ (3.83) $ 0.87 $ 0.85
======== ======= =======
Diluted..................................... $ (3.83) $ 0.76 $ 0.75
======== ======= =======
Weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding:
Basic....................................... 5,955 5,478 4,570
======== ======= =======
Diluted..................................... 5,955 6,292 5,184
======== ======= =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
PCD Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands, except share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Additional Retained Treasury Stock
---------------- Paid-in Earnings Deferred --------------- Stockholders'
Shares Par Value Capital (Deficit) Compensation Shares Amount Equity
------ --------- ---------- --------- ------------ ------ ------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance,
December 31, 1994 4,951,032 $50 $ 3,794 $ 5,258 390,000 $(328) $ 8,774
Exercise of
stock options... 36,000 41 41
Issuance of
stock options... 239 $(239)
Tax benefit from
non-qualified
stock options
exercised....... 50 50
Amortization of
deferred
compensation.... 84 84
Net income....... 3,863 3,863
--------- --- ------- ------ ------ ------- ----- -------
Balance,
December 31, 1995 4,987,032 50 4,124 9,121 (155) 390,000 (328) 12,812
Public stock
offering, net... 1,100,000 11 10,490 10,501
Exercise of
stock options... 157,701 2 192 194
Retired
treasury shares. (390,000) (4) (324) (390,000) 328
Tax benefit from
stock options
exercised....... 356 356
Amortization of
deferred
compensation.... 58 58
Net income....... 4,785 4,785
--------- --- ------- ------- ----- ------- --- -------
Balance,
December 31, 1996 5,854,733 59 14,838 13,906 (97) 28,706
Exercise of
stock options... 165,449 1 262 263
Tax benefit
from stock
options
exercised....... 673 673
Amortization of
deferred
compensation.... 58 58
Issuance of
stock warrant... 2,131 2,131
Net (loss)....... (22,836) (22,836)
--------- --- ------- ------- ----- ------- --- -------
Balance,
December 31, 1997 6,020,182 $60 $17,904 $(8,930) $ (39) $ 8,995
========= === ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statement
<PAGE>
PCD Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ended December 31,
------------------------
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income......................................... $(22,836) $ 4,785 $3,863
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Acquired in-process research and development... 44,438 - -
Depreciation................................... 1,530 1,389 1,026
Amortization of warrant........................ 34 - -
Loss (gain) on disposal of
equipment and improvements.................... (4) 107 261
Allowance for uncollectible accounts........... - 40 76
Amortization of deferred compensation.......... 58 58 84
Tax benefit from stock options exercised....... 673 356 50
Provision for deferred taxes................... (15,253) (80) (192)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable.............. 888 (54) (623)
Decrease (increase) in inventory............. (539) 259 (256)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid
expenses and other current assets.......... (68) 310 (48)
Increase in other assets
and debt financing fees.................... (1,830) (25) (45)
Increase(decrease)in accounts payable........ 479 (59) 205
Increase in accrued liabilities.............. 516 692 1,130
-------- -------- ------
Total adjustments....................... 30,922 2,993 1,668
-------- -------- ------
Net cash provided by operating activities........ 8,086 7,778 5,531
-------- -------- ------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Equipment and improvements expenditures............. (2,531) (1,902) (2,505)
Acquisition of Wells Electronics, Inc., net of
cash acquired of $827..............................(130,357) - -
------- ------- ------
Net cash used in investing activities............ (132,888) (1,902) (2,505)
------- ------- ------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt.......... 13,000 - -
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt........... 70,000 - -
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated
debenture and warrant............................. 25,000 - -
Exercise of common stock options................... 263 194 41
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net........ - 10,501 -
Principal payments under long-term debt obligations - - (37)
------- ------- ------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities 108,263 10,695 4
------- ------- ------
Net increase in cash............................... (16,539) 16,571 3,030
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year..... 20,529 3,958 928
------- ------- ------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year........... $ 3,990 $20,529 $3,958
======= ======= ======
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest...................................... $ 20 $ 9 $ 13
======= ======= ======
Income taxes.................................. $ 3,049 $ 2,452 $2,553
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the
consolidated financial statement
<PAGE>
PCD INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature of Business:
PCD Inc. ("the Company") is engaged principally in designing,
manufacturing and marketing electronic connectors for use in and
integrated circuit ("IC") package interconnect applications,
industrial equipment and avionics. Electronic connectors are used
in virtually all electronic systems, including data
communications, telecommunications, computers and computer
peripherals, industrial controls, automotive, avionics and test
and measurement instrumentation. As further discussed in Note 3,
on December 26, 1997 the Company acquired all of the outstanding
stock of Wells Electronics, Inc. ("Wells"). Wells designs,
develops and markets a broad line of test and burn-in sockets and
related carriers for the global IC package interconnect industry.
The effect of the purchase is recorded in the financial
statements.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon shipment to customers. The Company
grants to certain of its distributors limited return and stock
rotation rights. Historically, the Company's return rate has been
insignificant.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or fewer to
be cash equivalents. The Company invests excess cash in a money
market fund and indirect obligations of the United States
government. The Company had all its cash in interest bearing
accounts at December 31, 1997. Approximately $16.1 million was
invested in such cash equivalents at December 31, 1996. The
Company classifies its investments as available for sale; however
at December 31, 1996, cost approximates fair value.
<PAGE>
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Estimates
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash
investments and trade receivables. The Company invests primarily
in high quality securities with short lives. Accordingly, these
investments are subject to minimal credit and market risk.
Collateral is not required for trade receivables, but ongoing
credit evaluations of customer's financial condition are
performed. As a result of the Wells acquisition, a greater
portion of the Company's accounts receivable will be concentrated
in the IC package interconnect and semiconductor industries. The
Company has not experienced significant losses related to
receivables from individual customers or groups of customers in
the IC package interconnect and semiconductor industries or by
geographic region. Additionally, the Company maintains reserves
for potential credit losses. Due to these factors, no additional
credit risk beyond amounts provided for collection losses is
believed by management to be inherent in the Company's accounts
receivables.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
most significant estimates included in these financial statements
are allowances for uncollectible accounts, allowances for
inventory valuation, goodwill, intangible assets and deferred
taxes.
Inventory
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined on a
first-in, first-out method, or market.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred.
<PAGE>
Net Income Per Common Share
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
Earnings Per Share ("FAS 128"). FAS 128 requires dual
presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share on the face
of the income statement for all entities with complex capital
structures. Basic earnings per share is computed using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the effect of
the additional number of common shares that would have been
outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been
outstanding. Under FAS 128, the computation of the basic earnings
per share does not assume the conversion, exercise, or contingent
issuance of securities that have an anti-dilutive effect on
earnings per share. The Company has issued a subordinated
debenture, described in Note 9, that has a conversion feature to
common stock upon the occurrence of certain events of default.
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, the following tables
reconcile net income (loss) and weighted average shares
outstanding to the amounts used to calculate basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per share for each of the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Income Per Share
(Loss) Shares Amount
----------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1997
Basic and diluted loss...................... $(22,836,000) 5,954,657 $(3.83)
============ ========= ======
For the year ended December 31, 1996
Basic earnings.............................. $ 4,785,000 5,478,330 $ 0.87
Assumed exercise of options (treasury method) - 813,523 -
------------ --------- ------
Diluted earnings........................... $ 4,785,000 6,291,853 $ 0.76
============ ========= ======
For the year ended December 31, 1995
Basic earnings.............................. $ 3,863,000 4,570,032 $ 0.85
Assumed exercise of options (treasury method) - 613,667 -
------------ --------- ------
Diluted earnings............................ $ 3,863,000 5,183,699 $ 0.75
============ ========= ======
</TABLE>
In 1997, Common Stock equivalents of 679,468 shares were not
included in the calculation of diluted EPS.
<PAGE>
Equipment and Improvements
Equipment and improvements are recorded at cost. Maintenance
and repairs which neither materially add to the value of the
property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense
as incurred. Upon retirement or other disposition, the cost and
related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts
and the resulting gain or loss is included in the results of
operation
Depreciation of equipment and improvements is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated Useful
Life in Years
----------------
<S> <C>
Tools, dies and molds........... 5
Machinery and equipment......... 10
Office furniture and fixtures... 5
Transportation equipment........ 4
Computer software............... 3
Leasehold improvements.......... Shorter of lease
term or useful life
</TABLE>
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability approach of
accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability
approach, deferred taxes are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in
which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax
expense (benefit) represents the change in the deferred tax asset
or deferred tax liability balance. Tax credits are treated as
reductions of income taxes in the year in which the credits
become available for tax purposes.
<PAGE>
Goodwill
Goodwill is accounted for in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board ("APB") No. 17, Intangible Assets. Goodwill
represents costs in excess of net assets of the business acquired
and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected
periods to be benefited, which is currently 20 years. The
Company's policy is to assess the goodwill based on an evaluation
of such factors as the occurrence of a significant adverse event
or change in the environment in which the business operates. An
impairment loss would be recorded in the period such
determination is made based on the undiscounted cash flows of the
related businesses. No impairment losses have been recognized in
any of the periods presented.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with SFAS
121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. Intangible assets are stated
at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method. Loan
acquisition fees are amortized over the life of the applicable
indebtedness. Trademarks and trade names are amortized over their
estimated remaining economic lives of 20 years, consistent with
industry norms. Patented technologies are amortized over their
estimated remaining economic lives of 6 years.
3. ACQUISITION OF WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.:
On December 26, 1997, pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement
dated November 17, 1997, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding common stock of Wells Electronics, Inc. Wells is a
manufacturer of IC package interconnect products. The acquisition
was financed by a combination of a new bank credit facility of
$90 million of which the Company borrowed approximately
$83 million upon consummation of the acquisition and a
$25 million subordinated debenture. The acquisition is being
accounted for as a purchase in accordance with APB Opinion No. 16.
In accordance with APB Opinion No. 16, the Company has
allocated the purchase price based on the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. Acquired intangible assets
consist of trade names and trademarks and patented technologies
valued at approximately $10.4 million and $3.1 million,
respectively. A portion of the purchase price was allocated to
these intangible assets using a risk adjusted discounted cash
<PAGE>
flow approach. These intangibles are being amortized over their
estimated remaining economic lives of 6 and 20 years,
respectively. Additionally, a portion of the purchase price was
allocated to purchased research and development projects that were
identified as having no alternative future value and had not yet
reached technological feasibility. Purchased research and
development that had not reached technological feasibility and
that had no alternative future use was valued under a risk
adjusted cash flow model, under which future cash flows were
discounted taking into consideration risks relating to existing
and future markets. This analysis resulted in an allocation of
approximately $44 million to acquired in-process research and
development expense. This amount was charged to operations at the
acquisition date. A final allocation of the purchase price will be
completed in 1998 based on determination of the final purchase
price. The purchase price is subject to adjustment by the amount,
if any, by which the net worth, with certain adjustments, of Wells
as of the closing date, as agreed to by the Company and the
seller, is less than or more than the corresponding net worth as
of September 30, 1997. The adjustment is expected to be favorable
to the Company, but is not expected to be material. The final
allocation is not expected to differ materially from amounts
previously reported.
The aggregate purchase price of $131,184,000, includes
acquisition costs. Acquisition costs consist of approximately
$500,000 of financial advisory fees and $684,000 of professional
fees. The aggregate purchase price was allocated as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands)
--------------
<S> <C>
Current assets................................ $ 7,568
Equipment and improvements.................... 9,501
Acquired intangibles.......................... 13,539
Acquired in-process research and development.. 44,438
Goodwill...................................... 61,718
Other assets.................................. 1,369
Liabilities assumed........................... (6,949)
--------
$131,184
========
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the Company,
assuming the acquisition of Wells occurred at the beginning of
the period presented are as follows:
<PAGE>
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended
-----------------
1997 1996
-------- --------
(In thousands, except
per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales............................. $71,386 $49,779
Net income (loss)..................... 5,570 (1,342)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic............................... $ 0.94 $ (0.24)
Diluted............................. $ 0.82 $ (0.24)
Pro forma operating results for years ended 1997 and 1996
include costs of $4.0 million of amortization of goodwill and
acquired intangible assets and $10.0 million of interest expense.
Approximately $44.4 million of expense related to the acquired
in-process research and development is excluded from both 1997 and
1996.
These unaudited pro forma operating results are included for
information purposes only and may not be indicative of the
results of operations for PCD and Wells had they been a single
entity during 1996 and 1997.
4. INVENTORY:
Inventory consisted of the following at December 31:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials and
finished subassemblies........ $3,387 $1,908
Work in process................ 532 226
Finished goods................. 877 474
------ ------
Total.......................... $4,796 $2,608
====== ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
5. Equipment and Improvements:
Equipment and improvements consisted of the following at
December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Tools, dies and molds............. $11,244 $5,192
Machinery and equipment........... 5,546 2,586
Office furniture and fixtures..... 1,978 936
Computer software................. 99 89
Transportation equipment.......... 205 168
Leasehold improvements............ 718 493
------- ------
19,790 9,464
Less accumulated depreciation..... 4,852 4,379
------- ------
14,938 5,085
Capital expenditures in progress...... 905 252
------- ------
Property and improvements, net...... $15,843 $5,337
======= ======
</TABLE>
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL:
Goodwill is accounted for in accordance with APB 17,
Intangible Assets. The Company assesses the realizability of
intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 121, Accounting for
the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is
stated at cost and amortized on a straight line basis over the
estimated future periods to be benefited, which is currently 20
years. The Company's policy is to assess the goodwill based on
an evaluation of such factors as the occurrence of a significant
adverse event or change in the environment in which the business
operates. An impairment loss would be recorded in the period
such determination is made based on the undiscounted cash flows
of the related businesses. No impairment losses have been
recognized in any of the periods presented. Intangible assets
are amortized on a straight-line basis, based on their estimated
remaining economic lives, as follows:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Estimated
Remaining
Balance Economic
December 31, 1997 Life
----------------- ---------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Patented technology.......... $ 3,155 6 years
Tradenames/trademarks........ 10,384 20 years
Goodwill..................... 61,718 20 years
</TABLE>
7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES:
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Compensation and benefits..... $2,210 $ 760
Professional fees............. 846 1,002
Income taxes payable.......... 2,604 730
Other......................... 1,784 631
------ ------
Total......................... $7,444 $3,123
====== ======
</TABLE>
8. LINE OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT:
Prior to the acquisition of Wells discussed in Note 3, the
Company had unsecured lines of credit with a bank. The agreement
provided for up to $5,250,000 in a revolving credit line with
interest payable monthly at the bank's base lending rate until
June 30, 1998. As of December 31, 1996, no amounts were
outstanding under this line of credit.
On December 26, 1997, in connection with the Wells acquisition
discussed in Note 3, the Company entered into a secured
$20,000,000 Revolving Credit Agreement ("Revolver") with several
banks replacing the previous $5,250,000 agreement described
above, a $30,000,000 Secured Term Loan Agreement A and a
$40,000,000 Secured Term Loan Agreement B (collectively referred
to as the "Senior Credit Facility"). The Revolver provides for
direct borrowings or letters of credit and expires December 31,
<PAGE>
2003; Term Loan Agreement A expires December 31, 2003; and Term
Loan Agreement B expires December 31, 2004. The Senior Credit
Facility is collateralized by all of the assets of PCD and Wells.
In conjunction with the Senior Credit Facility, PCD and Wells
each entered into a stock pledge agreement with these banks
pledging all or substantially all of the stock of the
subsidiaries of PCD and Wells. Each of PCD, Wells and certain of
their subsidiaries also entered into a security agreement and
certain other collateral or conditional assignments of assets.
Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest, at the
Company's option, at either: (i) the higher of the lender's base
rate, or a rate equal to 1/2 of 1% per annum above the weighted
average of the rates on overnight federal funds transactions with
members of the Federal Reserve System arranged by federal funds
brokers, plus between 25 and 200 basis points based on the ratio
of senior indebtedness to the Company's earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), or (ii) a
periodic fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus between 150 and 325 basis
points based on the ratio of senior indebtedness to EBITDA. The
Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging
from 0.35% to 0.50% per annum, based on a certain financial ratio
of the Company, of the unused commitment under the Revolver.
There are no prepayment fees on the Senior Credit Facility. At
December 31, 1997, borrowings of $83,000,000 were outstanding
under the Senior Credit Facility at a weighted average interest
rate of 8.96%.
The Agreement governing the Senior Credit Facility contains
numerous financial and operating covenants that are effective as
of the quarter ending March 28, 1998. Among these covenants are
restrictions that the Company (i) must maintain John L. Dwight,
Jr. as chief executive officer of the Company or obtain the
consent of the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility to any
replacement of Mr. Dwight; (ii) may not, without the prior
consent of such lenders, acquire the assets of or ownership
interest in, or merge with, other companies; and (iii) may not,
without the prior consent of such lenders, pay cash dividends.
The Senior Credit Facility also requires the Company to maintain
certain financial covenants, including minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio, as defined, minimum quick ratio, as defined,
maximum ratio of total senior debt to EBITDA, maximum ratio of
total indebtedness for borrowed money to EBITDA, minimum interest
coverage ratio, maximum capital expenditures, as defined, during
the terms of the Senior Credit Facility. However, there can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to maintain compliance
with these covenants, and failure to meet such covenants would
<PAGE>
result in an event of default under the Senior Credit Facility.
In addition, the Company estimates that the fair value of the
loans approximates the carrying value in the financial
statements.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- ----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Term Loan A......................... $30,000 -
Term Loan B......................... 40,000 -
------- ---
$70,000 -
Less - current portion.............. 4,700 -
------- ---
$65,300 -
======= ===
</TABLE>
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended December 31 Amount
---------------------- ----------
(In thousands)
<S> <C>
1998..................................... $ 4,700
1999..................................... 4,900
2000..................................... 5,200
2001..................................... 5,400
2002..................................... 5,800
2003 and thereafter...................... 44,000
-------
$70,000
=======
</TABLE>
9. SUBORDINATED DEBENTURE:
On December 26, 1997, the Company entered into a Subordinated
Debenture ("Debenture") and Warrant Purchase Agreement ("Purchase
Agreement") with Emerson Electric Co. ("Emerson"), the Company's
largest stockholder. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the
Company issued to Emerson a Debenture with a principal amount of
<PAGE>
$25 million at an annual rate of interest of 10% and a Common
Stock Purchase Warrant (the "Emerson Warrant") for the purchase
of up to 525,000 shares of PCD Common Stock at a purchase price
of $1.00 per share. The combined effective interest rate for the
Debenture, the exercisable portion of the Emerson Warrant and the
prepayment penalty is 45.4% as the Debenture is expected to be
repaid approximately four months after the date of issuance. The
individual components of this effective interest rate are (i) 10%
per annum direct interest expense, (ii) 25.6% effective interest
expense associated with the value of the Emerson Warrant; and
(iii) 9.8% of effective interest expense due to prepayment
penalties. The Emerson Warrant is initially exercisable for
150,000 shares of Common Stock. If the principal and interest on
the Debenture have not been paid in full as of December 31, 1998,
the Emerson Warrant becomes exercisable for an additional 225,000
shares. If the principal and accrued interest on the Debenture
have not been paid in full as of December 31, 1999, the Emerson
Warrant becomes exercisable for the remaining 150,000 additional
shares. Prepayment of the principal amount under the Debenture is
subject to a penalty, due at the time of prepayment, as follows:
(i) for the period beginning December 26, 1997 and ending June 30,
1998, an amount equal to 3.25% of the principal sum prepaid; (ii)
for the period beginning July 1, 1998 and ending September 30,
1998, an amount equal to 6.5% of the principal sum prepaid; and
(iii) for the period beginning October 1, 1998 and ending December
31, 1998, an amount equal to 9.75% of the principal sum prepaid.
At the option of the holder, the unpaid principal and accrued
interest under the Debenture is convertible into Common Stock
upon the occurrence of certain Events of Default thereunder, at a
conversion price equal to the lesser of $17.00 per share or 70%
of the average daily closing price of Common Stock for the 90
days preceding such default as reported by the Nasdaq Stock
Market. The Events of Default under the Debenture are (i)
insolvency; (ii) default under the Senior Credit Facility; (iii)
a payment default on the Debenture which default is not cured
within 10 business days; (iv) a material breach by the Company of
any representations or warranties or failure to comply with
covenants or agreements contained in the agreements with Emerson
which breach is not cured within 30 days, and (v) an undischarged
or unstayed judgment against the Company for an amount in excess
of $1 million. The total purchase price paid <PAGE>
by Emerson for the Debenture and Warrant was $25,000,000. The
proceeds from the sale of the Debenture and the Warrant were
applied in full to the purchase price paid by the Company in
connection with the Wells acquisition.
<PAGE>
The Company allocated the proceeds of the $25,000,000 between
the Subordinated Debenture and 150,000 shares of the 525,000 share
Emerson Warrant. The Company has valued 150,000 shares of the
525,000 share Emerson Warrant according to the Black-Scholes
model, and determined the value to be approximately $2,131,000.
The Company has recorded a credit to additional paid-in capital of
$2,131,000 and a reduction in the face amount of the Subordinated
Debenture for the same amount. This amount will be reflected as
additional interest expense over the period that the Subordinated
Debenture is expected to be outstanding. A change in the expected
repayment date will result in an additional charge to income based
on the value of the remaining warrants. The Subordinated Debenture
is expected to be repaid in approximately four months.
10. INCOME TAXES:
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ----
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current
Federal....... $ 2,937 $2,504 $2,466
State......... 514 471 447
-------- ------ ------
Total current. 3,451 2,975 2,913
-------- ------ ------
Deferred
Federal....... (12,107) (62) (174)
State......... (3,146) (18) (18)
-------- ------ ------
Total deferred (15,253) (80) (192)
-------- ------ ------
$(11,802) $2,895 $2,721
======== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The components of the net deferred tax asset consisted of the
following at December 31, 1997 and 1996:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
---- ----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Difference in accounting for inventory $ 148 $195
Accounts receivable allowances........ 81 90
Vacation and other accruals........... 351 297
In-process research and development... 15,362 -
Difference in depreciation methods.... (607) (500)
------- ----
Net deferred tax asset.............. $15,335 $ 82
======= ====
</TABLE>
The deferred tax consequences of temporary differences in
reporting items for financial statement and income tax purposes
are recognized, if appropriate. Realization of the future tax
benefits related to the deferred tax assets is dependent on many
factors, including the Company's ability to generate taxable
income. Future tax benefits are recognized to the extent that
realization of such benefits is more likely than not.
The analysis of the variance of income taxes as reported from
income taxes compiled at the U.S. statutory federal income tax
rate for continuing operations is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------- ---- ----
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income taxes at U.S. statutory rate of 34% $(11,777) $2,611 $2,239
State income taxes........................ (1,737) 300 284
Benefit of Foreign Sales Corporation...... 88 - -
Non-deductible expenditures............... 1,624 - -
Other, net................................ - (16) 198
-------- ------ ------
$(11,802) $2,895 $2,721
======== ====== ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Litigation:
On August 21, 1995, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, CTi
Technologies, Inc. ("CTi"), filed an action in the United States
District Court for the District of Arizona against Wayne K.
Pfaff, an individual residing in Texas ("Pfaff"), and Plastronics
Socket Company, Inc., a corporation affiliated with Pfaff,
alleging and seeking a declaratory judgment that two United
States patents issued to Pfaff and relating to certain burn-in
sockets for "leadless" IC packages (the "Pfaff Leadless Patent")
and ball grid array ("BGA") IC packages (the "Pfaff BGA Patent")
(collectively, the "Pfaff Patents") are invalid and are not
infringed by CTi, the products of which include burn-in sockets
for certain "leaded" packages (including Quad Flat Paks) (the
"CTi Leaded Products") and BGA packages (the "CTi BGA Products")
(collectively, the "CTi Products"). Pfaff has filed a
counterclaim alleging that CTi infringes the Pfaff Leadless
Patent and has requested an award of damages; the counterclaim
does not allege infringement of the Pfaff BGA Patent. Pfaff has
also sought a permanent injunction against further infringement
by CTi of the Pfaff Leadless Patent. That action has been stayed
pending resolution of another action, described below, involving
the Pfaff Leadless Patent.
In litigation between Wells and Pfaff concerning the Pfaff
Leadless Patent, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit has found all of the individual descriptions of
the invention (the "Claims" of the patent) of the Pfaff Leadless
Patent which were at issue in that case to be invalid. The basis
for the decision of the Court of Appeals was a finding that the
invention covered by the Pfaff Leadless Patent had been "on sale"
for more than one year before the filing of a patent application.
An invention that has been "on sale" for more than one year before
the filing of the patent application may not be patented. Certain
other Claims of the patent were not at issue in the Pfaff v. Wells
case, and their validity was not decided by the Court of Appeals,
because Pfaff did not allege that products of Wells infringed such
Claims. These other Claims include design elements not
incorporated into products of Wells or CTi, including the use of
contact pins formed with a pair of parallel blades extending from
a common base. The United States Supreme Court has accepted an
appeal on the Pfaff v. Wells case, limited to the question of
whether the Pfaff Leadless Patent should have been held invalid on
<PAGE>
the basis of the "on sale" bar if Pfaff's invention was not "fully
completed" more than one year before he filed his patent
application. The Supreme Court could affirm or reverse the
decision of the Court of Appeals. If the Supreme Court affirms
the decision of the Court of Appeals, the determination of
invalidity of the Claims at issue in the Pfaff v. Wells case will
become final. This determination will be binding with respect to
such Claims in the CTi v. Pfaff action in the District of Arizona.
The reasoning of the Pfaff v. Wells decision, moreover, could
support CTi's position that the remaining Claims of that patent
are invalid. This conclusion is based on the Company's belief
that the invention covered by such remaining Claims was also "on
sale" for more than one year before the date of the application
for the Pfaff Leadless Patent. If the Supreme Court reverses the
decision of the Court of Appeals, the lower courts will then
determine the validity of the Claims of the Pfaff Leadless Patent
at issue on other grounds and will determine whether the products
of Wells infringe on these Claims of the Pfaff Leadless Patent.
The Company believes, based on the advice of counsel, that CTi
and Wells have meritorious defenses against any allegations of
infringement under the Pfaff Patents, and, if necessary, CTi and
Wells will vigorously litigate their positions. There can be no
assurance, however, that the Company, CTi or Wells will prevail in
any pending or future litigation, and a final court determination
that CTi or Wells has infringed the Pfaff Leadless Patent could
have a material adverse effect on the Company. Such adverse effect
could include, without limitation, the requirement that CTi or
Wells pay substantial damages for past infringement and an
injunction against the manufacture or sale in the United States of
such products as are found to be infringing.
Leases:
The Company leases office and production facilities in
Peabody, Massachusetts, Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, and Phoenix,
Arizona. These rentals are subject to escalation in real estate
taxes and operating expenses. Rental expense for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 was $480,000, $498,000, and
$500,000 respectively.
In conjunction with the Wells acquisition, leased production
facilities in South Bend, Indiana, Yokohama, Japan and Swatara,
Pennsylvania and leased distribution and technical sales support
facilities in Northhampton, England; Regensburg, Germany; Seoul,
South Korea; Singapore and Penang, Malaysia were added.
<PAGE>
Minimum future rental commitments under leases with remaining
terms in excess of one year are approximately as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
December 31, Amount
------------- --------
(In thousands)
<S> <C>
1998............................ $1,136
1999............................ 1,012
2000............................ 914
2001............................ 914
2002............................ 913
2003 and thereafter............. 1,972
</TABLE>
12. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors is authorized, subject to any
limitations prescribed by law, from time to time to issue up to
an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $0.10 par
value per share, with such powers, designations, preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and
such qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as
shall be determined by the Board of Directors in a resolution or
resolutions providing for the issuance of such Preferred Stock.
Common Stock
In February 1996, the stockholders approved an increase in the
authorized common stock of the Company to 25,000,000 shares,
$0.01 par value per share, and the stockholders approved a
twelve-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock
dividend. All references to the number of shares and per share
amounts have been restated to reflect the split.
Treasury Stock
On January 30, 1996, the Board of Directors approved a
resolution to restore any and all Common Stock of the Company
which had been repurchased by the Company to the status of
authorized but unissued shares.
<PAGE>
Stock Options:
Directors Stock Plan
The Company's 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan (the
"Directors Stock Plan") was approved by the Board of Directors on
January 30, 1996 and thereafter by the Company's stockholders.
Under the Directors Stock Plan, commencing with the 1997 annual
meeting of stockholders, each director who is not an officer or
employee of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company (an
"outside director") who has not previously been granted an option
to purchase shares of Common Stock will be granted, on the
thirtieth day after such meeting, an option to purchase 3,000
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value on the date of grant. In addition, on the thirtieth
day after such meeting, each outside director will be granted an
option at each annual meeting of stockholders to purchase 1,500
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the fair
market value on the date of grant. A total of 36,000 shares of
Common Stock are available for awards under the Directors Stock
Plan. Each option shall vest 6 months after, and expire 10 years
from, the date of grant of such option. No options may be granted
under the Directors Stock Plan after January 29, 2006.
1996 Stock Plan
The Company's 1996 Stock Plan was approved by the Board of
Directors on January 30, 1996, and thereafter by the Company's
stockholders. The 1996 Stock Plan provides for the grant or award
of stock options, restricted stock and other performance awards
which may or may not be denominated in shares of Common Stock or
other securities (collectively, the "Awards"). Stock options
granted under the 1996 Stock Plan may be either incentive stock
options or non-qualified options. The 1996 Stock Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee. Subject to the
provisions of the 1996 Stock Plan, the Committee has the
authority to designate participants, determine the types of
Awards to be granted, the number of shares to be covered by each
Award, the time at which each Award is exercisable or may be
settled, the method of payment and any other terms and conditions
of the Awards. While the Committee determines the prices at which
options and other Awards may be exercised under the 1996 Stock
Plan, the exercise price of an option shall be at least 100% of
the fair market value (as determined under the terms of the 1996
Stock Plan) of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. The
aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for awards
<PAGE>
under the Plan is 324,000. No option shall be exercisable with
respect to any shares later than 10 years after the date of grant
of such options or 5 years in the case of incentive options
granted to the owner of stock possessing more than 10% of the
value of all classes of stock of the Company. Vesting is
determined in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors. In connection with Committee's grants
to date, it has fixed vesting in four approximately equal annual
installments, the first of which vests on the date of grant. No
awards may be made under the 1996 Stock Plan after January 29,
2006.
1992 Stock Option Plan
The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan as amended on January 30,
1996 provides for the grant or award of stock options, which may
be either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options
to key employees and directors. The aggregate number of shares of
Common Stock reserved for issuance under the 1992 Stock Plan is
636,600 shares. No option shall be exercisable with respect to
any shares later than 10 years after the date of grant of such
options or 5 years in the case of incentive options granted to
the owner of stock possessing more than 10% of the value of all
classes of stock of the Company. Vesting is determined in the
sole discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. In connection with Committee's grants to date, it has
fixed vesting in four approximately equal annual installments,
the first of which vests on the date of grant. The Compensation
Committee administers the 1992 Stock Option Plan.
The following table summarizes the transactions from these plans:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
exercise
Options average price
------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Options outstanding at December 31, 1994 846,000 $ 1.15
Options exercised... (36,000) 1.15
Options granted..... 144,000 1.68
-------
Options outstanding at December 31, 1995 954,000 1.23
Options exercised... (157,701) 1.22
Options granted..... 15,000 12.00
-------
Options outstanding at December 31, 1996 811,299 1.43
Options exercised... (165,449) 1.59
Options cancelled... (4,000) 12.00
Options granted..... 78,000 21.08
-------
Options outstanding at December 31, 1997 719,850 3.46
=======
</TABLE
<PAGE>
Summarized information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 1997 is as follows:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exercisable
Weighted -------------------
average Weighted Weighted
Number of remaining average average
Range of options contractual exercise Number of exercise
exercise prices outstanding life price options price
--------------- ----------- ----------- -------- --------- --------
<C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 1.15 518,100 4.75 $ 1.15 518,100 $ 1.15
1.54-2.08 118,500 7.45 1.67 91,500 1.65
12.00 6,500 8.58 12.00 2,500 12.00
16.125-18.50 26,750 9.34 17.13 10,250 16.84
23.25 50,000 10.00 23.25 8,335 23.25
</TABLE>
For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, options
to purchase 630,685 shares, 740,049 shares and 825,000 shares,
respectively, of Common Stock were exercisable with the remaining
options becoming exercisable at various dates through
December 26, 2002. The weighted average exercise price of
outstanding options for the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1995 were $1.25 and $1.18, respectively. The Company has recorded
deferred compensation of $239,000 for the difference between fair
value and exercise price for options granted in 1995 and such
deferred compensation is being amortized over the option vesting
period.
Generally, when shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of
incentive stock options are sold within one year of exercise or
within two years from the date of grant, the Company derives a
tax deduction measured by the amount that the fair market value
exceeds the option price at the date the options are exercised.
When nonqualified stock options are exercised, the Company
derives a tax deduction measured by the amount that the fair
market value exceeds the option price at the date the options are
exercised.
Supplemental Disclosure for Stock Based Compensation:
The Company has three stock-based compensation plans, which
are described above. In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123 is effective
for periods beginning after December 15, 1995. SFAS 123 requires
that companies either recognize compensation expense for grants
<PAGE>
of stock, stock options, and other equity instruments based on
fair value, or provide pro forma disclosure of net income and
earnings per share in the notes to the financial statements. The
Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 in 1996 and
has applied APB Opinion 25 and related Interpretations in
accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has
been recognized for its stock option plans. Had compensation cost
for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined
based on the fair value at the grant dates as calculated in
accordance with SFAS 123, the Company's net income (loss) and
earnings (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996 and 1995 would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As reported Pro forma
----------- ---------
1997
----
<S> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)................. $(22,836) $(23,119)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic............................ $ (3.83) $ (3.88)
Diluted.......................... $ (3.83) $ (3.88)
1996
----
Net income........................ $ 4,785 $ 4,665
Net income per share:
Basic............................ $ 0.87 $ 0.85
Diluted.......................... $ 0.76 $ 0.74
1995
----
Net income........................ $ 3,863 $ 3,772
Net income per share:
Basic............................ $ 0.85 $ 0.83
Diluted.......................... $ 0.75 $ 0.73
</TABLE>
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Dividend yield.................... none none none
Expected volatility............... 48.79% 45.00% 0.00%
Risk free interest rate........... 7.27% 7.27% 7.13%
Expected life (years) ............ 5.0 10.0 10.0
</TABLE
<PAGE>
Weighted average fair value of options granted at fair value
at date of grant:
1997.......... $12.73
======
1996.......... $ 7.83
======
Weighted average fair value of options granted below fair
value at date of grant:
1995.......... $ 2.53
======
The effect of applying SFAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure
is not indicative of future amounts. The SFAS does not apply to
awards made prior to 1995. Additional awards in future years are
anticipated.
13. PROFIT SHARING PLAN:
Effective May 1, 1992, the Company adopted a Plan pursuant to
Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), whereby
employees may contribute a percentage of compensation, but not in
excess of the maximum allowed under the Code. Employees are
eligible for participation at the beginning of the calendar
quarter following their one year anniversary. The Company makes
matching contributions of fifty percent of employee contributions
up to 6% of employee compensation; however, the Company's total
contribution may not exceed 15% of the prior year's pre-tax
income unless authorized by the Board of Directors. The Company's
matching contributions were approximately $93,000, $80,000 and
$82,000 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively.
Wells Electronics, Inc. Deferred Compensation and Savings Plan
(Salaried 401(k)) allows for salaried employees to contribute up
to a maximum allowable under the Code. Wells makes matching
contributions of 25% of the employee contribution. Wells
Electronics, Inc. Union Employees' 401(k) Plan allows for all
union employees to contribute a minimum contribution ($0.19 per
hour through February 18, 1998). For those employees who
contribute at least the minimum, Wells matches $0.19 per hour
through February 18, 1998. As part of the liabilities assumed as
a result of the Wells acquisition, a liability was recorded for
approximately $46,000.
<PAGE>
14. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND EXPORT SALES:
One customer accounted for approximately 14.5%, 17.4% and
16.6% of the Company's net sales in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. A second customer accounted for approximately 12.7%
and 13.4% of the Company's net sales in 1997 and 1995,
respectively. The Company had export sales of approximately
$3,876,000, $2,975,000 and $3,022,000 in 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. All export sales are in U.S. dollars. No one
country or region (other than the United States) accounted for
greater than 10% of net sales.
15. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands, except per share data)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Three Months Ended
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mar 29, Jun 28, Sep 27, Dec 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1997
----
Net sales.............. $6,217 $7,233 $8,077 $8,269
Gross profit........... 2,953 3,507 3,927 4,289
Net income............. 1,175 1,504 1,693 (27,208)
Net income per share:
Basic................ $ 0.20 $ 0.25 $ 0.28 $(4.52)
Diluted.............. $ 0.18 $ 0.23 $ 0.26 $(4.52)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Three Months Ended
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mar 31, Jun 29, Sep 28, Dec 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996
----
Net sales.............. $7,087 $7,223 $6,222 $6,325
Gross profit........... 3,235 3,222 2,725 3,218
Net income............. 1,130 1,348 1,068 1,239
Net income per share:
Basic................ $ 0.25 $ 0.24 $ 0.19 $ 0.21
Diluted.............. $ 0.21 $ 0.21 $ 0.16 $ 0.19
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
16. SUBSEQUENT EVENT (UNAUDITED):
The Company utilizes a significant number of computer software
programs and operating systems across its entire organization,
including applications used in manufacturing, product
development, financial business systems and various
administrative functions. The Company believes that, with the
exception of the South Bend, Indiana location, its computer
systems will be able to manage and manipulate all material data
involving the transition from 1999 to 2000 without functional or
data abnormality and without inaccurate results related to such
data. However, there can be no assurances that potential systems
interruptions or the cost necessary to update software would not
have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition, results of operations or business. In addition, the
Company has limited information concerning the compliance status
of its suppliers and customers. In the event that any of the
Company's significant suppliers or customers do not successfully
and timely achieve Year 2000 compliance, the Company's financial
condition, results of operations and business could be adversely
affected.
The Company believes that, within the next nine months, it
will have to replace the current systems at Wells-CTI South Bend
with new systems that are Year 2000 compliant. Failure to replace
such systems could result in the generation of erroneous data or
system failure. Significant uncertainty exists concerning the
potential effects associated with Year 2000 compliance, and Year
2000 issues involving systems of Wells-CTI South Bend could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition,
results of operations or business. The cost of replacing computer
systems of Wells-CTI South Bend is currently estimated to be up
to $900,000.
The Company filed a registration statement in February 1998 on
Form S-1 for a public offering to raise proceeds to both retire
the subordinated debenture and pay down a portion of the Senior
Credit Facility.
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors
Wells Electronics, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Wells
Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 3, 1997 (Successor), and April
27, 1996 (Predecessor) and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the 53 weeks ended May 3, 1997
(Successor period), the 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and the 52 weeks ended
June 3, 1995 (Predecessor periods). These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the aforementioned Successor consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Wells Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 3, 1997, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the Successor period, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. Further, in our opinion, the
aforementioned Predecessor consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Electronics, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of April 27, 1996, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the Predecessor periods, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective May 2, 1996, Siebe plc acquired all of the outstanding stock of
Unitech plc in a business combination accounted for as a purchase. As a result
of the acquisition, the consolidated financial information for the periods
after the acquisition is presented on a different cost basis than that for the
periods before the acquisition and, therefore, is not comparable.
/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 15, 1998
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MAY 3, 1997 AND APRIL 27, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Successor Predecessor
----------- --------------
MAY 3, 1997 APRIL 27, 1996
----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Cash & cash equivalents.......................... $ 95 $ 441
Accounts receivable -- trade..................... 4,516 3,843
Allowance for uncollectible accounts............. (100) (100)
Inventory........................................ 2,540 3,446
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........ 416 475
Deferred tax assets.............................. 571 547
-------- -------
Total current assets................... 8,038 8,652
Property, plant and equipment, net............... 9,224 4,319
Intangible assets, net........................... 10,157 714
Due from affiliate............................... 3,231 --
Other assets..................................... 135 228
------- -------
Total assets........................... $30,785 $13,913
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Short-term debt.................................. $ 268 $ 1,153
Accounts payable -- trade........................ 3,016 2,801
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities... 2,669 2,008
Due to affiliate................................. -- 11
------- -------
Total current liabilities.............. 5,953 5,973
Long-term debt................................... -- 1,458
Deferred tax liabilities......................... 6,185 149
Minority interest................................ 6 --
------- -------
Total liabilities...................... 12,144 7,580
------- -------
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Common stock, $10 par value; 13,500 authorized
shares; issued 7,825 shares...................... 78 78
Additional paid-in capital......................... 14,510 6,547
Retained earnings.................................. 4,367 (292)
Foreign currency translation adjustments........... (314) --
------- -------
Total shareholder's equity............... 18,641 6,333
------- -------
Commitment and contingencies....................... -- --
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity $30,785 $13,913
======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR 53 WEEKS ENDED MAY 3, 1997; 48 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 27, 1996
AND 52 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 3, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Predecessor Successor
------------------------------ ------------
MAY 3, 1997 APRIL 27, 1996 JUNE 3, 1995
------------ -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales...................... $27,492 $ 17,998 $18,579
Cost of sales.................. 13,181 9,271 9,732
------- ------- -------
Gross profit.............. 14,311 8,727 8,847
Operating expenses............. 8,758 6,624 7,272
------- ------- -------
Income from operations.... 5,553 2,103 1,575
Non-operating income(expense):
Interest income................ 11 6 10
Interest expense............... (93) (115) (126)
Royalty income................. 630 844 404
Minority interest.............. (6) -- --
Other expense.................. (23) (40) (42)
Foreign exchange gain/(loss)... 264 40 (180)
------- ------- -------
Total non-operating income 783 735 66
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes..... 6,336 2,838 1,641
Provision for income taxes..... 1,969 586 798
------- ------- -------
Net Income........... $ 4,367 $ 2,252 $ 843
======= ======= =======
Earnings per share............. $558.08 $ 287.80 $107.73
======= ======= =======
Average number of shares....... 7,825 7,825 7,825
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
FOR 53 WEEKS ENDED MAY 3, 1997; 48 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 27, 1996
AND 52 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 3, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOREIGN
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL CURRENCY
----------------- PAID-IN RETAINED TRANSLATION TOTAL
SHARES PAR VALUE CAPITAL EARNINGS ADJUSTMENTS EQUITY
------ --------- ---------- -------- ----------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance,
May 29, 1994.. 7,825 $78 $ 6,547 $ (3,387) $ 35 $3,273
Net income..... 843 843
Net change
foreign
currency
translation
adjustment.... 238 238
----- --- ------- ------- ----- -------
Balance,
June 3, 1995.. 7,825 78 6,547 (2,544) 273 4,354
Net income..... 2,252 2,252
Net change
foreign
currency
translation
adjustment.... (273) (273)
----- --- ------- ------- ----- -------
Balance,
April 27, 1996 7,825 78 6,547 (292) -- 6,333
Acquisition
adjustments... 7,963 292 8,255
Net income..... 4,367 4,367
Net change
foreign
currency
translation
adjustment.... (314) (314)
----- --- ------- ------- ----- -------
Balance,
May 3, 1997... 7,825 $78 $ 14,510 $ 4,367 $(314) $18,641
===== === ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR 53 WEEKS ENDED MAY 3, 1997; 48 WEEKS ENDED APRIL 27, 1996
AND 52 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 3, 1995
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Successor Predecessor
----------- ----------------------------
MAY 3, 1997 APRIL 27, 1996 JUNE 3, 1995
----------- -------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income.............................. $ 4,367 $ 2,252 $ 843
------- ------- -------
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization......... 2,205 1,426 1,870
Gain on disposition of equipment...... (59) (12) (38)
Provision for (benefit from)
deferred taxes...................... 50 (30) (49)
Changes in operating assets
and liabilities:
Increase in accounts receivable.... (673) (732) (1,550)
Decrease (increase) in inventory... 906 (1,038) (520)
Decrease (increase) in prepaid
expenses and other current assets. 60 (176) 193
Decrease (increase) in other assets 93 (23) 9
Decrease in due from affiliate..... (3,242) (454) (1,433)
Increase in accounts payable....... 215 337 1,902
Increase (decrease) in
current liabilities.............. 661 (91) 476
Increase (decrease) in
other liabilities................ 3 4 (260)
------- ------- -------
Total adjustments.............. 219 (789) 600
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 4,586 1,463 1,443
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures................... (2,975) (1,971) (2,093)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets..... 386 18 67
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities... (2,589) (1,953) (2,026)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Net (payments of) proceeds from
short-term debt..................... (885) 739 414
Principal payments of long-term debt.. (1,458) (241) --
Proceeds from loan.................... -- -- 56
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities............................ (2,343) 498 470
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash
equivalents........................... (346) 8 (113)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
the period............................. 441 433 546
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents
at end of period.......................$ 95 $ 441 $ 433
======= ======= =======
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest.............................. $ 82 $ 109 $ 116
======= ======= =======
Income taxes.......................... $ 1,301 $ 1,055 $ 567
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statement
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAY 3, 1997 AND APRIL 27, 1996
(IN THOUSANDS)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
As of May 3, 1997 and for the year then ended (fiscal 1997),
Wells Electronics, Inc. ("the Company"), an Indiana Corporation,
was a wholly owned subsidiary of UL America, Inc., whose ultimate
parent company, Siebe plc, is a publicly held corporation based
in the United Kingdom. On April 24, 1989, UL America, Inc.
acquired Wells Electronics, Inc., and for the eleven months ended
April 27, 1996 (fiscal 1996) and the year ending May 31, 1995
(fiscal 1995), the Company was a wholly owned subsidiary of UL
America, Inc.
The Company has two subsidiaries: Wells Electronics Asia Pte
Ltd. in Singapore ("Wells Asia") which is a wholly owned
subsidiary and Wells Japan Ltd. ("Wells Japan") in Japan which is
approximately 98% owned by the Company. The remaining 2% is owned
by a Japanese corporation.
The Company is principally engaged in designing, developing,
manufacturing and marketing a broad line of burn-in/test sockets
and plastic carriers for the global semiconductor industry. These
products are employed in the handling and quality assurance phase
of semiconductor manufacturing.
The Company's ultimate parent, Unitech plc, was acquired by
Siebe plc, on May 2, 1996. Following the acquisition, a new basis
of accounting was applied. The fair market revaluation of the
Company's assets and liabilities resulted in an acquisition
adjustment of $8,255, net of the related deferred tax liability
of $5,962. As a result of the acquisition, property, plant and
equipment was written up to appraised fair market value of $8,535
(net historical cost was $4,319). Additionally, trademarks and
software were written up to appraised fair market value of
$10,001 (net historical cost was $0) and goodwill of $708 was
retained. There were no other significant accounting adjustments.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
<PAGE>
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Wells Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles. The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The most significant estimates included in these
financial statements are allowance for uncollectible accounts,
inventory reserves, and warranty reserves.
There are 53, 48, and 52 weeks in fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, due to the change in the fiscal year end subsequent
to the Siebe plc acquisition.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Sales and related cost of sales are recognized upon shipment
of products to customers.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade
receivables. The Company provides credit to customers in the
normal course of business. Collateral is not required for trade
receivables, but ongoing credit evaluations of customers'
financial condition are performed. Additionally, the Company
maintains reserves for potential credit losses. As of April 27,
1996 and May 3, 1997 the Company had no significant receivable
write-offs. The Company operates in a single segment of the
semiconductor industry.
<PAGE>
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The
inventories are valued at standard cost which approximates the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method. Certain inventories are
valued at the moving average cost method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
For fiscal 1997, property, plant and equipment are stated at
fair value based upon independent appraisal. For fiscal 1996 and
1995, property, plant and equipment are stated on the basis of
cost. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the present
value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease.
Material, labor and overhead costs associated with the
manufacture of molds are capitalized and classified as tooling.
Acquisition cost is used to cost molds which are purchased from
outside vendors.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of depreciable properties as follows:
buildings and improvements, 10 to 33 years; machinery and
equipment, 7 to 13 years; and tooling, 2 to 6 years.
Equipment held under capital leases and lease improvements are
amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the
lease term or estimated useful life of the asset.
INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statement bases and the tax bases of the
Company's assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax
rates applicable to future years.
<PAGE>
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The straight-line method is used to amortize intangible
assets. The goodwill and trademarks are amortized to expense over
20 years and computer software is amortized over 6 years.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The accounts of foreign subsidiaries are measured using local
currency as the functional currency. For those operations, assets
and liabilities are translated into US dollars at the end of
period exchange rates and income and expenses are translated at
<PAGE>
the average exchange rates. Net exchange gains or losses
resulting from such translation are excluded from net income and
accumulated in a separate component of shareholder's equity.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS TO BE
DISPOSED OF
The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) Statement No. 121, Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed Of, during fiscal 1997. This statement requires that
long-lived assets, including associated goodwill, and certain
identifiable intangibles to be held and used be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. It
also requires that long-lived assets and certain intangible
assets to be disposed be reported at the lower of carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell. Adoption of this statement did
not have any impact on the Company's financial position, results
of operations, or liquidity.
NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Net income per common share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
3. FOREIGN OPERATIONS
The Company's net income is affected by foreign currency
exchange (gains) losses resulting from translating foreign
currency denominated trade receivables and payables of Wells
Japan and Wells Asia and other realized and unrealized foreign
currency (gains) losses.
<PAGE>
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw material and supplies............ $ 778 $1,463
Work in process...................... 223 349
Finished goods....................... 1,539 1,634
------ ------
$2,540 $3,446
====== ======
</TABLE>
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Land............................. $ -- $ 165
Buildings and improvements....... 171 1,467
Machinery and equipment.......... 4,186 5,480
Tooling.......................... 5,499 9,374
Construction in progress......... 576 480
------- -------
10,432 16,966
Less accumulated depreciation.... (1,208) (12,647)
------- -------
$ 9,224 $ 4,319
======= =======
</TABLE>
6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill............................. $ 708 $ 708
Computer software.................... 349 6
Trademarks........................... 9,674 --
------- -----
10,731 714
Less accumulated amortization........ (574) --
------- -----
$10,157 $ 714
======= =====
</TABLE>
7. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Compensation and benefits........... $1,038 $1,013
Income taxes payable................ 605 22
Product warranty.................... 300 100
Other accrued liabilities........... 726 873
------ ------
$2,669 $2,008
====== ======
</TABLE>
8. DEBT
Short-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ----
<S> <C> <C>
Line of credit........................ $214 $1,108
Current maturities of long-term debt.. 54 45
---- ------
Total short-term debt............... $268 $1,153
==== ======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Wells Japan has a Y125 million (approximately $985 at May 3,
1997) line of credit with a Japanese bank that was guaranteed by
its ultimate parent. The interest rate at May 1997 was 2.375% per
annum.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ---
<S> <C> <C>
Bank loan.............................. $ - $1,400
Capital lease obligation............... 54 103
--- ------
Total long-term debt......... 54 1,503
Less current maturities................ 54 45
--- ------
$ - $1,458
=== ======
</TABLE>
The outstanding bank loan balance of $1,400 as of 1996
represents borrowings against the Company's revolving line of
credit. The line was repaid in January 1997 and the interest rate
at the time of repayment was 7% per annum. Subsequent to the
repayment the line was cancelled.
9. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Components of income tax expense (benefit) consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT DEFERRED TOTAL
------- -------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997:
Federal........... $1,370 $ 43 $1,413
State and local... 353 -- 353
Foreign........... 196 7 203
------ ---- ------
$1,919 $ 50 $1,969
====== ==== ======
<PAGE>
1996:
Federal........... $ 358 $(30) $ 328
State and local... 109 -- 109
Foreign........... 149 -- 149
------ ---- ------
$ 616 $(30) $ 586
====== ==== ======
1995:
Federal........... $ 535 $(49) $ 486
State and local... 155 -- 155
Foreign........... 157 -- 157
------ ---- ------
$ 847 $(49) $ 798
====== ==== ======
</TABLE>
Actual income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by
applying the enacted US federal corporate rate to income before
income taxes as a result of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------ ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal income tax expense at statutory rate... $2,190 $965 $558
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Foreign tax rate differential................ 2 (50) (35)
Reduction of valuation allowance............. (499) (299) --
Foreign subsidiary losses.................... ------ ---- 144
State income taxes, net...................... 233 72 102
Other, net................................... 43 (102) 29
------ ----- ----
$1,969 $ 586 $798
====== ===== ====
</TABLE>
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to
deferred tax (assets) and liabilities follow:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Inventories -- principally obsolescence............... $ 201 $ 215
Bad debts............................................. 36 38
Other -- principally accruals......................... 334 294
Net operating loss carryforward....................... -- 499
------ ------
Total deferred tax assets..................... 571 1,046
Valuation allowance........................... -- (499)
------ ------
Net deferred tax assets....................... 571 547
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant & equipment........................... 1,828 10
Capital lease......................................... 148 131
Intangible assets..................................... 4,200 --
Other................................................. 9 8
------ ------
Total deferred tax liabilities................ 6,185 149
------ ------
Net deferred tax liability (asset)............ $5,614 $ (398)
====== ======
</TABLE>
10. LEASES
The company leases certain of its manufacturing facilities,
sales offices and equipment. Some leases include provisions for
renewals and purchases at the Company's option.
Rental expense for all operating leases approximated $562,
$241 and $233 in fiscal year 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Future minimum operating lease payments consist of the
following at May 3, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR
----------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1998.................................. $ 619
1999.................................. 615
2000.................................. 564
2001.................................. 511
2002.................................. 499
Thereafter............................ 1,738
------
Total minimum lease payments.......... $4,546
======
</TABLE
<PAGE>
11. PROFIT SHARING AND RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company has adopted a Plan ("401(k) Plan") pursuant to
Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Salaried employees may
contribute a percentage of their compensation to the 401(k) Plan,
but not in excess of the maximum allowed under the Code. Salaried
employees are eligible for participation at their one year
anniversary. The Company makes matching contributions of 25
percent of employee contributions but not in excess of the
maximum allowed under the Code. In addition to any Employer
401(k) Contribution discussed above, the Company in any Plan
Year, to the extent it has Net Profits or retained earnings, may
make additional matching Employer 401(k) Contributions to the
extent it deems appropriate at its complete discretion.
Effective February 19, 1997, the Company adopted a Retirement
Income Plan for the hourly employees whereby the Company will
make a contribution of $0.19 per hour for all hours worked into a
retirement income plan, with the employees contributing a
matching amount. The contribution will increase to $0.20 and
$0.22 per all hours worked effective February 19, 1998 and 1999,
respectively. The employee matching contribution will increase
accordingly.
The Company's combined matching contributions for the 401(k)
Plan and Retirement Income Plan were approximately $67, $63 and
$61 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company was charged with corporate management fees of $25
in 1997, $193 in 1996, and $272 in 1995. Non-interest bearing
long-term receivable due from affiliates was $3,231 at May 3,
1997. This consists of $2,550 from Siebe Inc. and $681 from UL
America, Inc.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has been party to ongoing litigation with Wayne K.
Pfaff and an affiliated corporation regarding alleged patent
infringements. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Federal
Circuit Court of Appeals found in favor of the Company.
Management believes that the likelihood of any future liability
in this regard is remote and as such, has established no
provision.
<PAGE>
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On November 17, 1997, UL America, Inc. agreed to sell all of
the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock to
PCD Inc. The purchase price of this transaction is $130 million.
15. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in the integrated circuit connector
industry which is a single industrial segment. One customer
accounted for approximately 18%, 15% and 18% of the Company's
sales in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The Company had no
other single customer with sales greater than 10% of total sales.
Sales between geographic areas are at cost plus approximately
50% mark-up. The Company has significant operations in foreign
countries. Information regarding operations by geographic area
for fiscal 1997, 1996 and 1995 is as follows:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FAR
USA EAST
------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal 1997:
Net Sales............................ $17,528 $9,964
Operating income..................... 3,749 1,804
Identifiable assets.................. 22,734 7,378
Fiscal 1996:
Net Sales............................ $10,049 $7,949
Operating income..................... 735 1,368
Identifiable assets.................. 7,302 5,903
Fiscal 1995:
Net Sales............................ $12,900 $5,679
Operating income..................... 572 1,003
Identifiable assets.................. 7,001 3,785
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
16. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) FOR THE:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
--------------------------------------
Fiscal 1997: MAY 3, FEB 1, OCT 26, JUL 27,
------ ------ ------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales.......... $8,767 $7,471 $ 5,284 $5,970
Gross profit....... 3,605 4,609 2,816 3,281
Net income......... 2,189 1,178 412 588
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED TWO MONTHS
--------------------------- ENDED
Fiscal 1996: APR 27, JAN 27, OCT 28, JUL 29,
------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Sales.......... $ 4,261 $ 4,635 $ 5,918 $3,184
Gross profit....... 2,036 2,049 3,026 1,616
Net income......... 647 424 957 224
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Independent Auditors' Report
The Board of Directors
Wells Electronics, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Wells Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 26, 1997
and the related consolidated statement of income, shareholder's
equity and cash flows for the 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Wells Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 26, 1997 and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the 34 weeks then ended in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 4, 1998, except for note 11 which is as of March 9, 1998
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as of December 26, 1997 and
December 31, 1996 (unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unaudited
Dec 26, Dec 31,
1997 1996
--------- --------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents...................... $ 827 $ 784
Accounts receivable - trade.................... 4,251 3,380
Allowance for uncollectible accounts........... (100) (95)
Inventory...................................... 1,879 2,585
Prepaid expenses and other current assets...... 495 553
Deferred tax assets............................ 758 425
------- -------
Total current assets...................... 8,110 7,632
Property, plant and equipment, net............. 9,501 8,590
Intangible assets, net......................... 9,746 10,327
Other assets................................... 185 831
------- -------
Total assets.............................. $27,542 $27,380
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current portion of capital lease debt.......... $ 18 $ 1,376
Accounts payable - trade....................... 2,997 2,410
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities. 4,338 1,725
------- -------
Total current liabilities................. 7,353 5,511
Long-term debt................................. -- 21
Deferred tax liabilities....................... 6,311 5,962
Minority interest.............................. 37 --
------- -------
Total liabilities......................... $13,701 $11,494
------- -------
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Common stock, $10 par value, 13,500 authorized
Shares, issued 7,825 shares.................. $ 78 $ 78
Additional paid-in capital..................... 14,510 14,510
Retained earnings.............................. (371) 1,514
Foreign currency translation adjustments....... (376) (216)
------- -------
Total shareholder's equity................ $13,841 $15,886
------- -------
Commitments and contingencies.................. - -
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity $27,542 $27,380
======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
for the 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997
and 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unaudited
Dec 26, 97 Dec 31, 96
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales...................... $ 29,268 $ 15,497
Cost of sales.................. 10,261 8,497
-------- --------
Gross profit................. 19,007 7,000
Operating expenses............. 7,423 5,246
-------- --------
Income from operations....... 11,584 1,754
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest expense............... (4) (84)
Royalty income................. 485 386
Minority interest.............. (34) --
Other income................... 73 56
Foreign exchange loss.......... (190) --
------- -------
Total non-operating income... 330 358
------- -------
Income before income taxes..... 11,914 2,112
Provision for income taxes..... 5,645 598
------- -------
Net income................... $ 6,269 $ 1,514
======= =======
Earnings per share............. $801.15 $193.48
======= =======
Average number of shares....... 7,825 7,825
======= =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
for 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997
(In thousands, except share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Foreign
Common Stock Additional Currency
----------------- Paid-in Retained Translation
Shares Par Value Capital Deficit Adjustments Total
------ --------- ---------- --------- ----------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance,
May 3, 1997 7,825 $ 78 $ 14,510 $ 4,367 $ (314) $18,641
Net income.. 6,269 6,269
Dividend.... (11,007) (11,007)
Net change
foreign
currency
translation
adjustment. (62) (62)
----- ----- -------- ------- ------ -------
Balance,
Dec 26, 97. 7,825 $ 78 $ 14,510 $ (371) $ (376) $13,841
===== ===== ======== ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997
and 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unaudited
Dec 26, Dec 31,
1997 1996
--------- ------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income...................................... $ 6,269 $ 1,514
------- -------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization................. 1,448 1,517
Loss on disposition of equipment.............. 45 --
Effect of changes in foreign currency......... -- (216)
Benefit from deferred taxes................... (61) (27)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in net accounts receivable......... 265 458
Decrease in inventory....................... 661 861
Increase in prepaid and other current assets (80) (78)
Increase in other assets.................... (50) (215)
(Decrease) increase in due from affiliates.. 3,231 (11)
Decrease in accounts payable ............... (19) (391)
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities.. 1,669 (283)
Increase in other liabilities............... 31 --
------- -------
Total adjustments......................... 7,140 1,615
------- ------
Net cash provided by operating activities......... 13,409 3,129
------- ------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures............................ (1,433) (1,572)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets.............. 13 --
------- ------
Net cash used in investing activities............. (1,420) (1,572)
------- ------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net payment of short-term debt.................. (250) (1,214)
Dividend........................................ (11,007) --
------- -------
Net cash used in financing activities............. (11,257) (1,214)
------- -------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents......... 732 343
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period.. 95 441
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period........ $ 827 $ 784
======= =======
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest...................................... $ 4 $ 88
======= ======
Income taxes.................................. $ 4,617 $ 419
======= ======
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statement
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 26, 1997
(In thousands)
1. Nature of Business
Wells Electronics, Inc. ("the Company"), an Indiana
Corporation, was a wholly owned subsidiary of UL America, Inc.,
whose ultimate parent company, Siebe plc, is a publicly held
corporation based in the United Kingdom.
The Company has two subsidiaries: Wells Electronics Asia Pte
Ltd. in Singapore ("Wells Asia") which is a wholly owned
subsidiary and Wells Japan Ltd. ("Wells Japan") in Japan which is
approximately 98% owned by the Company. The remaining 2% is owned
by a Japanese corporation.
The Company is principally engaged in designing, developing,
manufacturing and marketing a broad line of burn-in/test sockets
and plastic carriers for the global semiconductor industry. These
products are employed in the handling and quality assurance phase
of semiconductor manufacturing.
UL America, Inc.'s ultimate parent, Unitech plc, was acquired
by Siebe plc, on May 2, 1996. Following the acquisition, a new
basis of accounting was applied. The fair market revaluation of
the Company's assets and liabilities resulted in an acquisition
adjustment of $8,255, net of the related deferred tax liability
of $5,962. As a result of the acquisition, property, plant and
equipment was written up to appraised fair market value of $8,535
(net historical cost was $4,319). Additionally, trademarks and
software were written up to appraised fair market value of
$10,001 (net historical cost was $0) and goodwill of $708 was
retained. There were no other significant accounting adjustments.
On December 26, 1997, UL America, Inc. sold all of the
Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock to PCD
Inc. The purchase price of this transaction was $130 million.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Wells Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Significant
<PAGE>
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
most significant estimates included in these financial statements
are allowance for uncollectible accounts, inventory reserves, and
warranty reserves.
Revenue Recognition
Sales and related cost of sales are recognized upon shipment
of products to customers.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of trade
receivables. The Company provides credit to customers in the
normal course of business. Collateral is not required for trade
receivables, but ongoing credit evaluations of customers'
financial condition are performed. Additionally, the Company
maintains reserves for potential credit losses. As of December
26, 1997 the Company had no significant receivable write-offs.
The Company operates in a single segment of the semiconductor
industry.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are charged to expense as
incurred.
Inventories
<PAGE>
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The
inventories are valued at standard cost which approximates the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost method. Certain inventories are
valued at the moving average cost method.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment acquired on May 2, 1996 are
stated at fair value based upon independent appraisal. Subsequent
additions are recorded at cost. Equipment under capital leases is
stated at the present value of minimum lease payments at the
inception of the lease.
Material, labor and overhead costs associated with the
manufacture of molds are capitalized and classified as tooling.
Acquisition cost is used to cost molds which are purchased from
outside vendors.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of depreciable properties as follows:
buildings and improvements, 10 to 33 years; machinery and
equipment, 7 to 13 years; and tooling, 2 to 6 years.
Equipment held under capital leases and lease improvements are
amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the
lease term or estimated useful life of the asset.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statement bases and the tax bases of the
Company's assets and liabilities using enacted statutory tax
rates applicable to future years.
Intangible Assets
The straight-line method is used to amortize intangible
assets. The goodwill and trademarks are amortized to expense over
20 years and computer software is amortized over 6 years.
Foreign Currency Translation
The accounts of foreign subsidiaries are measured using local
currency as the functional currency. For those operations, assets
and liabilities are translated into US dollars at the end of
<PAGE>
period exchange rates and income and expenses are translated at
the average exchange rates. Net exchange gain or losses resulting
from such translation are excluded from net income and
accumulated in a separate component of shareholder's equity.
Net Income Per Common Share
Net income per common share is computed using the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding.
3. Foreign Operations
The Company's net income is affected by foreign currency
exchange (gains) losses resulting from translating foreign
currency denominated trade receivables and payables of Wells
Japan and Wells Asia and other realized and unrealized foreign
currency (gains) losses.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Raw material and supplies....... $1,249
Work in process................. 258
Finished goods.................. 372
------
$1,879
======
</TABLE>
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Buildings and improvements.......... $ 245
Machinery and equipment............. 4,759
Tooling............................. 6,721
Construction in progress............ 249
-------
11,974
Less accumulated depreciation....... (2,473)
-------
$ 9,501
=======
</TABLE
<PAGE>
6. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following:
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Goodwill...................... $ 708
Computer software............. 327
Trademarks.................... 9,674
-------
10,709
Less accumulated amortization. (963)
-------
$ 9,746
=======
</TABLE>
7. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Compensation and benefits......... $1,027
Income taxes payable.............. 2,666
Product warranty.................. 502
Other accrued liabilities......... 143
------
$4,338
======
</TABLE>
8. Income Tax Expense
Components of income tax expense (benefit) consist of:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CURRENT DEFERRED TOTAL
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal........... $ 2,843 $ 80 $ 2,923
State and local... 701 - 701
Foreign........... 2,230 (209) 2,021
------- ------ -------
$ 5,774 $ (129) $ 5,645
======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Actual income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by
applying the enacted US federal corporate rate to income before
income taxes as a result of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Federal income tax expense at statutory rate $ 4,051
Increase resulting from:
Foreign tax rate differential............. 772
State income taxes, net................... 463
Other, net................................ 359
-------
$ 5,645
=======
</TABLE>
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to
deferred tax assets and liabilities follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Deferred tax assets:
<S> <C>
Inventories - principally obsolesence $ 280
Warranty accruals.................... 300
Compensation and benefit accruals.... 142
Bad debts............................ 36
------
Net deferred tax assets............ 758
------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment........ 2,075
Intangible assets.................... 4,084
Other................................ 152
------
Total deferred tax liabilities..... 6,311
------
Net deferred tax liability......... $5,553
======
</TABLE>
9. Leases
The Company leases certain of its manufacturing facilities,
sales offices and equipment. Some leases include provisions for
renewals and purchases at the Company's option.
<PAGE>
Rental expense for all operating leases approximated $453 for
the 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997
Future minimum operating lease payments consist of the
following at December 26, 1997:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
YEAR
1998............................... $ 563
1999............................... 435
2000............................... 342
2001............................... 335
2002............................... 327
Thereafter......................... 1,563
-------
Total minimum lease payments....... $ 3,565
=======
</TABLE>
10. Profit Sharing and Retirement Plans
The Company has adopted a Plan ("401(k) Plan") pursuant to
Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Salaried employees may
contribute a percentage of their compensation to the 401(k) Plan,
but not in excess of the maximum allowed under the Code. Salaried
employees are eligible for participation at their one year
anniversary. The Company makes matching contributions of 25
percent of employee contributions but not in excess of the
maximum allowed under the Code. In addition to any Employer
401(k) Contribution discussed above, the Company in any Plan
Year, to the extent it has Net Profits or retained earnings, may
make additional matching Employer 401(k) Contributions to the
extent it deems appropriate at its complete discretion.
The Company has also adopted a Retirement Income Plan for the
hourly employees whereby the Company will make a contribution of
$0.19 per hour for all hours worked into a retirement income
plan, with the employees contributing a matching amount. The
contribution will increase to $0.20 and $0.22 per all hours
worked effective February 19, 1998 and 1999, respectively. The
employee matching contribution will increase accordingly.
The Company's combined matching contributions for the 401(k)
Plan and Retirement Income Plan were approximately $72, for the
34 weeks ended December 26, 1997.
<PAGE>
11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has been party to ongoing litigation with Wayne K.
Pfaff and an affiliated corporation regarding alleged patent
infringement.
In litigation between Wells and Pfaff concerning the Pfaff
Leadless Patent, the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit has found all of the individual descriptions of
the invention (the "Claims" of the patent) of the Pfaff Leadless
Patent which were at issue in that case to be invalid. Certain
other Claims of the patent were not an issue in that case, and
their validity was not decided by the court, because Pfaff did
not allege that products of Wells infringed such Claims. In
March, 1998, the United States Supreme Court accepted an appeal
on that case. Unless overturned, the Court of Appeals decision
as to the invalidity of such Claims of the Pfaff Leadless Patent
will be binding.
The Company believes, based on the advice of counsel, that the
Company has meritorious defenses against any allegations of
infringement under the Pfaff Patents, and, if necessary, the
Company will vigorously litigate their positions. There can be
no assurance, however, that the Company will prevail in any
pending or future litigation, and a final court determination
that the Company has infringed the Pfaff Leadless Patent could
have a material adverse effect on the Company. Such adverse
effect could include, without limitation, the requirement that
the Company pay substantial damages for past infringement and an
injunction against the manufacture or sale in the United States
of such products as are found to be infringing.
12. Segment and Geographic Information
The Company operates in the integrated circuit connector
industry which is a single industrial segment. There were three
customers who accounted for approximately 30%, 12% and 11% of the
Company's sales during the 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997. The
Company had no other single customer with sales greater than 10%
of total sales.
Sales between geographic areas are at cost plus approximately
50% mark-up. The Company has significant operations in foreign
countries. Information regarding operations by geographic area
for the 34 weeks ended December 26, 1997 is as follows:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
USA FAR EAST
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales............ $16,402 $12,866
Operating income..... 6,701 4,883
Identifiable assets.. 19,573 7,319
</TABLE>
13. Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) for the:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Two Months
-------------------- Ended
August 2 November 1 July 29
-------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fiscal 1998
- -----------
Net Sales........ $13,059 $ 9,675 $ 6,500
Gross Profit..... 8,207 6,414 4,027
Net Income (loss) 3,308 2,629 (725)
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON AUDITING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
For information with respect to the Executive Officers of the
Company, see "Executive Officers of the Registrant" at the end of
Part I of this Report. For information with respect to the
Directors of the Company, see "Election of Directors" in the
Proxy Statement for the PCD Inc. 1998 Annual Shareholders'
Meeting, which portion of the Proxy Statement hereby is
incorporated by reference.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, requires the Company's executive officers, directors,
and persons owning ten percent or more of a registered class of
the Company's equity securities to file reports of ownership and
changes in ownership of all equity and derivative securities of
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
SEC regulations also require that a copy of all such Section
16(a) forms filed must be furnished to the Company by such
officers, directors and shareholders.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms and
amendments thereto received by the Corporation, or written
representations from the Company's officers and directors that no
Forms 5 were required to be filed, the Company believes that
during 1997 all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to
its officers, directors and shareholders were met with the
exception of a report covering one transaction that was filed
late. Mr. Mullin's Section 16(a) filing on Form 3 was
inadvertently filed three days late. The late filing was made
promptly upon discovery of the oversight.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information contained under the caption "EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION" in the 1998 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein
by reference.
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The information contained under the caption "SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT" and "PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS" in the 1998
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information contained under the caption "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" in the 1998 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K
(a) Documents Filed as a part of the Form 10-K Report
1) Financial Statements
PCD INC.
December 31, 1997 and 1996
Report of Independent Accountants
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.
MAY 3, 1997 and APRIL 27, 1996
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 3, 1997 and April 27, 1996
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 53 weeks ended May 3, 1997,
the 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the 53 weeks ended
May 3, 1997, 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3,
1995
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 53 weeks ended May 3,
1997, 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
<PAGE>
WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.
DECEMBER 26, 1997
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 26, 1997 and
December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income for the 34 weeks ended December 26,
1997 and 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the 34 weeks
ended December 26, 1997
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the 34 weeks ended December
26, 1997 and the 35 weeks ended December 31, 1996 (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statements and schedules have been omitted
because the required information is included in the
consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto, or
is not applicable or required.
3) Listing of Exhibits
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
2.1(F4) Share Purchase Agreement among UL America, Inc., Wells Electronics, Inc.
and PCD Inc. dated as of November 17, 1997.
2.2(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Schedules to Share Purchase
Agreement dated as of November 17, 1997.
3.1(F1) Restated Article of Organization of Registrant effective March 22, 1996.
3.2(F1) By-Laws of the Registrant, as amended, effective April 1, 1996.
4.1(F1) Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Restated Articles of Organization of Registrant
(included in Exhibit 3.1).
4.2(F1) Specimen Stock Certificate.
10.1(F4) Loan Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of December
26, 1997.
10.2(F4) Unlimited Guaranty from Wells Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated
as of December 26, 1997.
10.3(F4) Security Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.4(F4) Security Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Fleet National Bank
dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.5(F4) Stock Pledge Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.6(F4) Stock Pledge Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Fleet National Bank
dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.7(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from PCD Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.8(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from Wells Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National
Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.9(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from Wells Japan Kabushiki Kaisha to Fleet
National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.10(F4) Conditional Trademark Collateral Assignment from PCD Inc. to Fleet National
Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.11(F4) Conditional Trademark Collateral Assignment from Wells Electronics, Inc. to
Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.12(F4) Collateral Assignment of Contracts, Leases, Licenses and Permits from PCD Inc.
to Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.13(F4) Collateral Assignment of Contracts, Leases, Licenses and Permits from Wells
Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.14(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Exhibits and Schedules to Loan
<PAGE>
Agreement and Related Documents dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.15(F4) Subordinated Debenture and Warrant Purchase Agreement between PCD Inc. and
Emerson Electric Co. dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.16(F4) Subordinated Debenture issued to Emerson Electric Co. dated December 26, 1997.
10.17(F4) Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Emerson Electric Co. dated December
26, 1997.
10.18(F4) Registration Rights Agreement between PCD Inc. and Emerson Electric Co. dated
as of December 26, 1997.
10.19(F4) Subordination Agreement among PCD Inc., Emerson Electric Co. and Fleet
National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.20(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Exhibits to Subordinated Debenture
and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.21(F1) Lease dated June 29, 1987, between Centennial Park Associates Realty Trust II
and the Company premises located at Two Technology Drive, Centennial Park,
Peabody, Massachusetts.
10.22(F5) Second Amendment to lease agreement dated July 15, 1993, between Centennial
Park Associates Partnership III and the Company.
10.23(F2) Third amendment to lease agreement dated as of June 25, 1996, between the
Company and Cent Associates Limited Partnership III.
10.24(F1) Lease dated May 1995, between CMD Southwest Four and CTi Technologies, Inc.,
for premises to 2102 W. Quail Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona.
10.25(F5) Lease dated September 21, 1995, between Blackthorn Area Partners and Wells
Electronics, Inc. for premises located at 52940 Olive Road, South Bend,
Indiana.
10.26(F5) Amendment dated May 16, 1997 to Lease dated September 21, 1995, between
Blackthorn Area Partners and Wells Electronics, Inc. for premises located at
52940 Olive Road, South Bend, Indiana.
10.27(F5) Sublease dated October 10, 1992, between Daiwa House Kogya Co., Ltd and Wells
Japan, Ltd. for premises located at Paleana Building 2-2-15, Shin-Yokohoma,
Kohuku-Ku, Yokohoma, Japan (English translation).
10.28(F5) Lease dated September 25, 1997, between United Building and Leasing
Corporation and Wells Electronics, Inc. for premises located at 421 Amity
Road, Swatara, Pennsylvania.
10.29(F1) Registrant's 1992 Stock Option Plan and related forms of stock option
agreement.
10.30(F1) Registrant's 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.31(F1) Registrant's 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.32(F3) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Stock Plan.
10.33(F3) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.34(F1) April 2, 1985 Stock Purchase Agreement and Amendment to Stock Purchase
Agreement dated March 31, 1983.
10.35(F5) Collective Bargaining Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Local
Union 1392, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, dated February
19,1997.
10.36(F1) Letter of Agreement dated September 18, 1995, between International
Assemblers, Inc. and CTi Technologies, Inc.
10.37(F5) Letter Agreement with Richard J. Mullin, effective December 26, 1997.
10.38(F5) Management Incentive Plan.
11.1(F5) Statement re computation of per share earnings.
21.1(F5) Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P., independent accountants.
23.2 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent accountants.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1997.
27.2 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended September 27, 1997 (restated).
27.3 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 28, 1997 (restated).
27.4 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended March 29, 1997 (restated).
27.5 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1996 (restated).
27.6 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended September 28, 1996 (restated).
27.7 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 29, 1996 (restated).
27.8 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended March 30, 1996 (restated).
99.1(F4) Press Release of PCD Inc. dated December 29, 1997.
- -----------
</TABLE>
(F1) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (Registration no. 333-1266), as filed on February
12, 1996, and amended on March 15 and March 21, 1996, and is
incorporated in this document by reference.
<PAGE>
(F2) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on March 28, 1997,
and is incorporated in this document by reference.
(F3) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on September 27,
1997, and is incorporated in this document by reference.
(F4) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's current report on
Form 8-K, (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on January 9, 1998,
and as amended on March 11 and 24, 1998 and April 20, 1998 and is
incorporated in this document by reference.
(F5) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on form S-1 (Registration No. 333-46137), as filed on
February 12, 1998, and amended on March 20, 1998 and April 13, 1998, and
is incorporated in this document by reference.
Management Contracts and Compensatory Plans
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
------- -----------------------
<S> <C>
10.29(F1) Registrant's 1992 Stock Option Plan and related forms of stock option
agreement.
10.30(F1) Registrant's 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.31(F1) Registrant's 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.32(F2) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Stock Plan.
10.33(F2) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.37(F3) Letter Agreement with Richard J. Mullin, effective December 26, 1997.
10.38(F3) Management Incentive Plan.
</TABLE>
- ----------
(F1) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (Registration no. 333-1266), as filed on February
12, 1996, and amended on March 15 and March 21, 1996, and is
incorporated in this document by reference.
(F2) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on September 27,
1997, and is incorporated in this document by reference.
(F3) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on form S-1 (Registration No. 333-46137), as filed on
February 12, 1998, and amended on March 20, 1998 and April 13, 1998, and
is incorporated in this document by reference.
B. Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed no reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of
1997.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
PCD INC.
Dated: April 20, 1998 By: /s/ John L. Dwight, Jr.
-----------------------------
John L. Dwight, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, President
and
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: April 20, 1998 By: /s/ Mary L. Mandarino
----------------------------
Mary L. Mandarino
Vice President - Finance and
Administration, Chief Financial
Officer, and Treasurer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
Dated: April 20, 1998 By: /s/ Bruce E. Elmblad
----------------------------
Bruce E. Elmblad
Director
Dated: April 20, 1998 By: /s/ Harold F. Faught
----------------------------
Harold F. Faught
Director
Dated: April 20, 1998 By:
----------------------------
C. Wayne Griffith
Director
Dated: April 20, 1998 By: /s/ Theodore C. York
----------------------------
Theodore C. York
Director
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description of Document
------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
2.1(F4) Share Purchase Agreement among UL America, Inc., Wells Electronics, Inc.
and PCD Inc. dated as of November 17, 1997.
2.2(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Schedules to Share Purchase
Agreement dated as of November 17, 1997.
3.1(F1) Restated Article of Organization of Registrant effective March 22, 1996.
3.2(F1) By-Laws of the Registrant, as amended, effective April 1, 1996.
4.1(F1) Articles 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Restated Articles of Organization of Registrant
(included in Exhibit 3.1).
4.2(F1) Specimen Stock Certificate.
10.1(F4) Loan Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of December
26, 1997.
10.2(F4) Unlimited Guaranty from Wells Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated
as of December 26, 1997.
10.3(F4) Security Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.4(F4) Security Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Fleet National Bank
dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.5(F4) Stock Pledge Agreement between PCD Inc. and Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.6(F4) Stock Pledge Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Fleet National Bank
dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.7(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from PCD Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated as of
December 26, 1997.
10.8(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from Wells Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National
Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.9(F4) Conditional Patent Assignment from Wells Japan Kabushiki Kaisha to Fleet
National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.10(F4) Conditional Trademark Collateral Assignment from PCD Inc. to Fleet National
Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.11(F4) Conditional Trademark Collateral Assignment from Wells Electronics, Inc. to
Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.12(F4) Collateral Assignment of Contracts, Leases, Licenses and Permits from PCD Inc.
to Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.13(F4) Collateral Assignment of Contracts, Leases, Licenses and Permits from Wells
Electronics, Inc. to Fleet National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.14(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Exhibits and Schedules to Loan
Agreement and Related Documents dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.15(F4) Subordinated Debenture and Warrant Purchase Agreement between PCD Inc. and
Emerson Electric Co. dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.16(F4) Subordinated Debenture issued to Emerson Electric Co. dated December 26, 1997.
10.17(F4) Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Emerson Electric Co. dated December
26, 1997.
10.18(F4) Registration Rights Agreement between PCD Inc. and Emerson Electric Co. dated
as of December 26, 1997.
10.19(F4) Subordination Agreement among PCD Inc., Emerson Electric Co. and Fleet
National Bank dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.20(F4) Undertaking to Furnish Copies of Omitted Exhibits to Subordinated Debenture
and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of December 26, 1997.
10.21(F1) Lease dated June 29, 1987, between Centennial Park Associates Realty Trust II
and the Company premises located at Two Technology Drive, Centennial Park,
Peabody, Massachusetts.
10.22(F5) Second Amendment to lease agreement dated July 15, 1993, between Centennial
Park Associates Partnership III and the Company.
10.23(F2) Third amendment to lease agreement dated as of June 25, 1996, between the
Company and Cent Associates Limited Partnership III.
10.24(F1) Lease dated May 1995, between CMD Southwest Four and CTi Technologies, Inc.,
for premises to 2102 W. Quail Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona.
10.25(F5) Lease dated September 21, 1995, between Blackthorn Area Partners and Wells
Electronics, Inc. for premises located at 52940 Olive Road, South Bend,
Indiana.
10.26(F5) Amendment dated May 16, 1997 to Lease dated September 21, 1995, between
Blackthorn Area Partners and Wells Electronics, Inc. for premises located at
52940 Olive Road, South Bend, Indiana
<PAGE>
10.27(F5) Sublease dated October 10, 1992, between Daiwa House Kogya Co., Ltd and Wells
Japan, Ltd. for premises located at Paleana Building 2-2-15, Shin-Yokohoma,
Kohuku-Ku, Yokohoma, Japan (English translation).
10.28(F5) Lease dated September 25, 1997, between United Building and Leasing
Corporation and Wells Electronics, Inc. for premises located at 421 Amity
Road, Swatara, Pennsylvania.
10.29(F1) Registrant's 1992 Stock Option Plan and related forms of stock option
agreement.
10.30(F1) Registrant's 1996 Stock Option Plan.
10.31(F1) Registrant's 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.32(F3) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Stock Plan.
10.33(F3) Form of option agreements for the 1996 Eligible Directors Stock Plan.
10.34(F1) April 2, 1985 Stock Purchase Agreement and Amendment to Stock Purchase
Agreement dated March 31, 1983.
10.35(F5) Collective Bargaining Agreement between Wells Electronics, Inc. and Local
Union 1392, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, dated February
19,1997.
10.36(F1) Letter of Agreement dated September 18, 1995, between International
Assemblers, Inc. and CTi Technologies, Inc.
10.37(F5) Letter Agreement with Richard J. Mullin, effective December 26, 1997.
10.38(F5) Management Incentive Plan.
11.1(F5) Statement re computation of per share earnings.
21.1(F5) Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P., independent accountants.
23.2 Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, independent accountants.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1997.
27.2 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended September 27, 1997 (restated).
27.3 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 28, 1997 (restated).
27.4 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended March 29, 1997 (restated).
27.5 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1996 (restated).
27.6 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended September 28, 1996 (restated).
27.7 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended June 29, 1996 (restated).
27.8 Financial Data Schedule for the quarter ended March 30, 1996 (restated).
99.1(F4) Press Release of PCD Inc. dated December 29, 1997.
- -----------
</TABLE>
(F1) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (Registration no. 333-1266), as filed on February
12, 1996, and amended on March 15 and March 21, 1996, and is
incorporated in this document by reference.
(F2) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on March 28, 1997,
and is incorporated in this document by reference.
(F3) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on September 27,
1997, and is incorporated in this document by reference.
(F4) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's current report on
Form 8-K, (Commission file no. 0-27744), as filed on January 9, 1998,
and as amended on March 11 and 24, 1998 and April 20, 1998 and is
incorporated in this document by reference.
(F5) A copy has been previously filed with the Company's registration
statement on form S-1 (Registration No. 333-46137), as filed on
February 12, 1998, and amended on March 20, 1998, and April 13, 1998, and
is incorporated in this document by reference.
<EXHIBIT>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of PCD Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-07393, 333-07403 and
333-07405) of our report dated February 11, 1998, except information included
under the caption Litigation in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, as to
which the date is April 13, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of PCD Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 which report is included in this
amendment number one to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P
Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
Boston, Massachusetts
April 17, 1998
<EXHIBIT>
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
PCD Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-07393, 333-07403 and 333-7405) of our
report dated February 4, 1998, except for note 11, which is as of March 9,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Wells Electronics, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 26, 1997 the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the 34 weeks ended
December 26, 1997, and to our report dated January 15, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Wells Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
May 3, 1997 and April 27, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the 53 weeks ended May 3,
1997, the 48 weeks ended April 27, 1996 and the 52 weeks ended June 3, 1995,
which reports are included in this amendment number one to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A.
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 17, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM PCD INC.'S 1997 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 3,990
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 7,009
<ALLOWANCES> 205
<INVENTORY> 4,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 16,725
<PP&E> 20,695
<DEPRECIATION> 4,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 126,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 29,357
<BONDS> 88,203
0
0
<COMMON> 60
<OTHER-SE> 8,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 126,592
<SALES> 29,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 29,796
<CGS> 15,120
<TOTAL-COSTS> 15,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 5,816
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1,167
<INCOME-PRETAX> (34,638)
<INCOME-TAX> (11,802)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (22,836)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (22,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (3.83)
<EPS-DILUTED> (3.83)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END> SEP-27-1997
<CASH> 23,732
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,492
<ALLOWANCES> 242
<INVENTORY> 3,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 31,132
<PP&E> 11,332
<DEPRECIATION> 5,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 37,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,327
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 60
<OTHER-SE> 33,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 37,246
<SALES> 21,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 21,527
<CGS> 11,140
<TOTAL-COSTS> 11,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 4,279
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 6,934
<INCOME-TAX> 2,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 4,372
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 4,372
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.74
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.66
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRAACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END> JUN-28-1997
<CASH> 21,141
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 5,195
<ALLOWANCES> 234
<INVENTORY> 2,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 29,101
<PP&E> 10,665
<DEPRECIATION> 5,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 34,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,144
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 59
<OTHER-SE> 31,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 34,973
<SALES> 13,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 13,450
<CGS> 6,990
<TOTAL-COSTS> 6,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 2,748
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 0
<INCOME-PRETAX> 4,248
<INCOME-TAX> 1,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 2,679
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 2,679
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.45
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.41
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRAACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END> MAR-29-1997
<CASH> 20,747
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,345
<ALLOWANCES> 236
<INVENTORY> 2,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 27,810
<PP&E> 10,108
<DEPRECIATION> 4,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 33,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,365
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 59
<OTHER-SE> 30,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 33,486
<SALES> 6,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 6,217
<CGS> 3,264
<TOTAL-COSTS> 3,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 1,356
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,858
<INCOME-TAX> 683
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 1,175
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,175
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.20
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.18
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 20,529
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 3,810
<ALLOWANCES> 232
<INVENTORY> 2,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 26,804
<PP&E> 9,716
<DEPRECIATION> 4,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 32,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,750
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 59
<OTHER-SE> 28,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 32,456
<SALES> 26,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 26,857
<CGS> 14,457
<TOTAL-COSTS> 14,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 5,445
<LOSS-PROVISION> 40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 9
<INCOME-PRETAX> 7,680
<INCOME-TAX> 2,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 4,785
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 4,785
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.87
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.76
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY FROM REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> SEP-28-1996
<CASH> 18,125
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,233
<ALLOWANCES> 222
<INVENTORY> 2,338
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 24,516
<PP&E> 10,098
<DEPRECIATION> 4,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 30,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,896
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 58
<OTHER-SE> 27,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 30,039
<SALES> 20,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 20,532
<CGS> 11,350
<TOTAL-COSTS> 11,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 4,012
<LOSS-PROVISION> 30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 9
<INCOME-PRETAX> 5,650
<INCOME-TAX> 2,104
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 3,546
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 3,546
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.66
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.57
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY FROM REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> JUN-29-1996
<CASH> 16,114
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,793
<ALLOWANCES> 262
<INVENTORY> 2,719
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 23,430
<PP&E> 9,778
<DEPRECIATION> 4,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 28,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 3,182
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 57
<OTHER-SE> 25,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 28,989
<SALES> 14,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 14,310
<CGS> 7,853
<TOTAL-COSTS> 7,853
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 2,776
<LOSS-PROVISION> 70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 3
<INCOME-PRETAX> 3,943
<INCOME-TAX> 1,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 2,478
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 2,478
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.48
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.41
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END> MAR-30-1996
<CASH> 4,725
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 3,915
<ALLOWANCES> 251
<INVENTORY> 2,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 11,369
<PP&E> 9,174
<DEPRECIATION> 4,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 16,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,735
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 46
<OTHER-SE> 13,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 16,662
<SALES> 7,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 7,087
<CGS> 3,852
<TOTAL-COSTS> 3,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 1,495
<LOSS-PROVISION> 60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 1
<INCOME-PRETAX> 1,794
<INCOME-TAX> 664
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 1,130
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 1,130
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0.25
<EPS-DILUTED> 0.21
</TABLE>
