<PAGE> 1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934.
For the transition period from _______ to _______.
Commission File Number 000-23415
Princeton Video Image, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
New Jersey 22-3062052
---------- ----------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)
</TABLE>
15 Princess Road, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
609-912-9400
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
------------------- -------------------
<S> <C>
None None
</TABLE>
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value
--------------------------
Title of Each Class
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the
price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of
such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days: $49,049,437,
based upon the last sales price on September 15, 2000.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 10,061,423 shares of
Common Stock, no par value per share, were outstanding on September 15, 2000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to
be held on December 5, 2000, is incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form.
<PAGE> 2
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Princeton Video Image, Inc. ("PVI", "we", "us") developed and is
marketing a real-time video insertion system that, through patented computer
vision technology, places computer-generated electronic images into live and
pre-recorded television broadcasts of sports and entertainment programming.
These electronic images range from simple corporate names or logos to
sophisticated multi-media 3-D animated productions. During the broadcast of a
sports or entertainment program, for example, an image can be placed to appear
to be physically located in various high visibility locations in the stadium, on
the playing field, or as part of the natural landscape of the scene. The Live
Video Insertion System (the "L-VIS(TM) System") has been used to insert images,
including advertising images and program enhancements, into both live and
pre-recorded television broadcasts. As part of our research and development
program, we are developing a series of products to allow viewers to interact
with live or recorded video programming delivered to the home via the Internet
or through interactive television. These applications will enable the viewer to
influence the on-screen presentation of a broadcast which utilizes the L-VIS
System by using a mouse or other pointer, for example, to indicate areas of
interest. We are also marketing our systems on a worldwide basis through
licensing and royalty agreements and through our majority-owned subsidiary,
Princeton Video Image Europe, N.V. ("PVI Europe"), which is headquartered in
Brussels, Belgium.
We believe that our L-VIS System, which is an integrated hardware and
software system, can benefit (i) advertisers, through the placement of their ads
in high visibility locations and by the ability to provide specific advertising
to specific geographical regions; (ii) broadcasters and program producers,
through a new revenue stream from additional inventory of advertising space or
program enhancements; and (iii) teams and leagues, through increased revenue
streams and greater flexibility and control over in-stadium advertising. The
L-VIS System has been used to insert images into live and pre-recorded
television broadcasts including baseball games, soccer matches, football games,
motor sports, horse races, tennis matches, ski jumping events, telethons, and
entertainment programming. In the future, viewers may be able to customize their
own television viewing experience by interacting with images inserted by our
L-VIS System.
It is our objective to become the leading provider of electronic
advertising and program enhancements to the broadcasters of sports and
entertainment programming as well as to television advertising markets
worldwide. The key elements of our strategy are (i) developing relationships
with sports rights owners such as the National Football League ("NFL"), National
Basketball Association ("NBA"), Major League Baseball ("MLB"), FIFA (soccer's
international governing body), specific teams and the governing bodies of other
sports; (ii) developing relationships with non-sports rights owners of first run
and syndicated entertainment programming; (iii) furthering our relationships
with national network broadcasters such as NBC, CBS, ABC, ESPN, TNT, and FOX;
(iv) working with high-profile advertisers to assist them in understanding and
capitalizing on the use of the L-VIS System; and (v) developing and enhancing
L-VIS System software so it can be used in Internet and interactive television
products as well as for additional sports and entertainment applications.
This document includes certain forward-looking statements made pursuant
to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as "anticipates," "believes," "plans," "estimates,"
"expects," and "intends," or words or phrases of similar expression. These
forward-looking statements are subject to various assumptions, risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated by the statements we make. Factors described in this Annual Report
1
<PAGE> 3
on Form 10-K, including without limitation those identified in this Item 1,
"Business" and in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations" could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement we make. We do
not promise to update forward-looking information or any other information to
reflect actual results or changes in assumptions or other factors that could
affect those statements.
We were incorporated in New Jersey on July 23, 1990.
OVERVIEW OF THE TELEVISION ADVERTISING AND SPONSORSHIP MARKET
Sports advertising and sponsorship is a significant market both inside
and outside the United States. Advertisers in the United States spent an
aggregate of approximately $10.9 billion to purchase television advertising and
sponsorship rights with respect to sporting events in 1999, according to
information from the following industry sources. The 1999 network and cable
television sports advertising markets in the United States were reported by Paul
Kagan Associates, Inc. ("Kagan Associates") to be approximately $3.8 billion and
$1.2 billion, respectively. The December 1999 IEG Sponsorship Report, a sports
newsletter published biweekly by IEG, Inc., projected that $5.92 billion would
be spent to sponsor specific teams, stadium locations and sporting events in
1999.
The cost of a television commercial spot is normally a function of the
nature and size of the expected audience of the event to be broadcast. A spot in
a national broadcast of a major sporting event, such as the Super Bowl or a
World Series game, sells for a price many times that of a spot in a regular
season game broadcast only locally or regionally. For example, the costs of a
30-second spot in the broadcast of a local 1999 regular season Philadelphia
Phillies baseball game, a 1999 nationally broadcast Monday night NFL football
game and the 1999 Super Bowl were approximately $3,000, $380,000 and $1,600,000,
respectively. Television broadcasters (including national television and cable
networks, regional cable networks, and local television and cable operators)
purchase television broadcast rights to sporting events from the holders of
those rights, which include individual teams as well as various leagues,
federations, associations and other organizations representing both professional
and amateur sports. Rights to specific games or events may be held by teams,
leagues, associations, or any combination thereof, depending on the arrangements
under which each sport is organized.
We believe that the growth of sports advertising and sponsorship is
largely driven by the desire on the part of advertisers to be "in the game" by
having their brands and products visible during the broadcast of televised live
or pre-recorded events. The development of video insertion technology has
created a new method of advertising in which the electronically inserted brand
or message can appear, to the television viewer, to be a part of the stadium or
natural landscape where the event is taking place. The L-VIS System can increase
the signage capacity of the stadium or venue from the television viewer's
perspective. By exposing the television viewer to the brand or message during
the event, the advertiser is "in the game" and can be more confident that its
message will actually be seen by the viewer, as the advertisement can be placed
strategically to appear on the television screen where traditional signage may
not be practical or available.
Sponsorship generally entails associating the sponsor's name with the
event or stadium as well as signage rights, i.e., the prominent display of the
sponsor's name and products in specified locations in the stadium or broadcast.
Sponsors purchase sponsorship rights from the holders of those rights. Like
broadcast rights, the ownership of sponsorship rights depends on the specific
sport and the event or location. In some cases, the owner of the venue at which
an event is staged holds the sponsorship rights to the event. In other cases,
the team owner may own the sponsorship rights, including signage. Advertisers or
their representatives negotiate sponsorship arrangements directly with
sponsorship rights holders and not with broadcasters. Since broadcasters
historically have not shared in sponsorship revenue, they traditionally have not
assisted sponsorship programs. In order to interest broadcasters in the
capabilities of the L-VIS System, we have made program enhancements available,
such as the virtual first down line in football and the virtual finish line in
horse racing.
2
<PAGE> 4
The success of the L-VIS System requires that we enter into satisfactory
commercial arrangements with advertisers, rights holders and broadcasters. To
date, many of the major broadcasters and a limited number of the broadcast
rights holders and advertisers have agreed to use our L-VIS System during live
and pre-recorded sports and entertainment broadcasts. Our continued expansion
will depend on, among other things, our ability to identify markets, to manage
growth, and to hire and retain skilled personnel. Some press coverage of our
technology has raised concerns about its desirability and potential misuse
relating to television tampering, ethics, and over commercialization. There can
be no assurance that the use of our L-VIS System will be accepted by television
viewers or that we will be able to combat effectively potential future negative
publicity regarding ours or similar technology. To the extent that we are unable
to more successfully market the L-VIS System our business might not develop as
quickly or to the extent necessary to support our current level of operations.
ABILITIES OF THE L-VIS SYSTEM
We believe that the L-VIS(TM) System provides advantages when compared
to traditional 30-second advertising spots and other forms of advertising
because the L-VIS System:
- Allows for "in the game" advertising. The L-VIS System allows
an advertiser to be "in the game" or broadcast, by having
their brands and products visible during the broadcast of
televised live and pre-recorded sports and entertainment
programming;
- Reduces the effect of channel surfing and viewer muting.
Because the L-VIS System allows for "in the game" advertising,
the negative effect of channel surfing, which often occurs
during traditional 30-second advertising spots, may be
reduced;
- Allows placement of advertising in high visibility locations.
The L-VIS System allows for the insertion of images into
places that otherwise might not be used for advertising
because of potential interference with the actual physical
playing surface or background such as the wall behind
homeplate in a baseball game;
- Creates new inventory for advertising rights holders. The
L-VIS System allows for new advertising by providing for the
insertion of images in locations that are unavailable for
conventional billboards, such as the racetrack in a motor
sports event, or the natural landscape or background during
news and other entertainment programming;
- Allows for "narrow casting" of specific advertising to
specific geographical regions. The L-VIS System also allows
for specific advertising to specific geographical regions.
Thus, where desired, a rights holder can sell the same
advertising space to different advertisers in different
markets; for instance, the Philadelphia broadcast of a San
Diego Padres-Philadelphia Phillies MLB game can include a
different inserted advertisement behind homeplate than the San
Diego broadcast;
- Provides for animation and audio-video advertising. The L-VIS
System may be used, when appropriate, to insert animation and
audio-video advertising within the program to enhance the
impact of the advertising;
- Allows branding of an event. Insertions made during a live
broadcast will be captured, or branded, on recordings of the
event and may then be shown around the world in re-broadcasts
and highlight films of the event. An advertiser will benefit
from every re-broadcast, such as re-broadcasts which occur
during the sports segment of most news programs; and
- Provides advertising to otherwise advertising-free
environments. Our technology can be
3
<PAGE> 5
used to insert advertising into otherwise advertising-free
environments, e.g., pay-per-view concerts, sports and
entertainment programming.
THE L-VIS SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY
Our L-VIS System is a system of proprietary hardware and software which
we have designed to insert electronic images into live and pre-recorded
television broadcasts of sports and entertainment programming. The inserted
images may be two or three dimensional, static or animated, opaque or
semi-transparent and may be placed so that the inserted images appear to exist
on the playing field, in the stadium or venue where a game or sporting event is
being played, or in the background or natural landscape in entertainment
programming. If a player or other object moves in front of an image that is
inserted on a wall, in the background, or on a playing field, the L-VIS System
is programmed so that the passing object occludes that portion of the inserted
image. The L-VIS System can also be used to insert a free standing image so that
the image will occlude a person or other object which "passes behind" it.
The basic L-VIS System, also referred to as the "Vision" system relies
on computer vision techniques that recognize prominent features in the
television picture and track the motion of the scene. This L-VIS System and its
operator may be located at the site of the event, at the network studios of the
broadcaster or at an individual station or cable system head-end carrying the
broadcast. Before the broadcast, the advertising images to be inserted are
prepared and the operator identifies the location in the broadcast scene where
the images will be inserted. The Vision system is designed to recognize the
broadcast scene in real time during the broadcast and to insert the image as
instructed each time the broadcast scene containing the insert location appears.
The operator controls which of several images is selected for insertion and when
it will be inserted.
We have designed software that allows for the use of the L-VIS System
using this computer vision technology in the live broadcasts of football,
baseball and soccer. For instance, in baseball our software allows images to be
inserted on the wall behind home plate, the outfield wall or the area above the
outfield wall. To the television viewer, a non-animated advertisement inserted
with the L-VIS Vision system, such as an advertisement on the wall behind home
plate, appears to be part of the original scene, in proper perspective and fixed
in the scene as the camera pans, tilts and zooms, and as players move in front
of the image. Furthermore, because an inserted image is not present at the
actual site of a sporting event, any distraction caused to the players by other
types of advertising such as scrolling billboards will not be present. A camera
sensor enhanced version of the L-VIS System can be used on almost any event
including horseracing, basketball, tennis and automobile racing broadcasts.
In May 2000, we announced a new product line, called iPoint, which is
based on the basic broadcast technologies described above but which will have
major implications in individualized, interactive television. While in the case
of the basic L-VIS product, the entire television viewing audience sees the same
insertions, in the case of the iPoint product line, it is intended that each
television viewer will see advertising and features designed specifically for
that individual viewer. The iPoint product is being developed to use the same
technology at the stadium, or other program origination site, as in the basic
L-VIS System, but the actual execution of the insertions is intended to be done
locally on the television or personal computer at home using software installed
in the individual television viewer's set top cable box. Using this digital set
top box technology that is being developed to run our software, internet
delivered advertisements and features can be inserted into the individual
television broadcast based on customer preferences. These advertisements and
features can be interactive, as well, allowing the viewer to customize their
viewing experience by selecting particular enhancements or options. An iPoint
enhanced baseball game, for instance, would allow viewers to select such virtual
enhancements as "clickable" player statistics or a virtual strike zone.
Entertainment programs could include interactive objects or virtual products,
giving the user instant pricing or detailed information without leaving the
program.
The first stage for iPoint is its implementation by the personal
computer user. We entered into an
4
<PAGE> 6
agreement with RealNetworks, Inc. ("RealNetworks") in May 2000, in which we have
agreed to jointly develop the software necessary to permit insertion of internet
delivered advertisements and features into streaming media on individual
personal computers. We also entered into an agreement in May 2000 with Engage,
Inc. whereby we have agreed to work collaboratively to provide marketing and
advertising services to the television broadcast industry for the application
being developed by us with RealNetworks. When this phase of development is
completed the next step will be the implementation of the iPoint product into
the set top box used by cable companies to deliver television programming into
households.
We operate in a rapidly developing commercial and technological
environment. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to develop
products for the Internet and interactive television as well as product
enhancements that keep pace with continuing changes in technology and customer
preferences. Our failure to develop these products on a timely basis would limit
the growth potential of our business and thus have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and the results of our operations. The video,
electronics, data processing, broadcast television and cable television
industries are changing rapidly due to, among other things, technological
improvements, consolidations of companies and changes in consumer preferences.
In particular, the live video image insertion market is relatively new and
continues to adapt to the changing preferences and customs of the broadcasters,
rights holders, and the ultimate television viewer. We anticipate that as the
market develops, it will continue to be affected by technological change and
product improvements as well as changes in industry broadcast standards.
STRATEGY
Our objective is to become the leading provider of electronic
advertising and program enhancements to the broadcasters of sports and
entertainment programming as well as to television advertising markets
worldwide. The key elements of our strategy include:
- Developing relationships with rights owners. We intend to
continue developing our relationships with rights owners such
as the NFL, MLB, NBA, FIFA, NASCAR, IRL, NHL, specific teams
and other sports governing bodies as well as the owners of
first run and syndicated entertainment programs;
- Developing relationships with broadcasters. We intend to
continue to develop the relationships we currently have with
national network broadcasters such as NBC, CBS, ABC, ESPN, TNT
and FOX;
- Working with high-profile advertisers. To promote acceptance
of the L-VIS System, our marketing executives are actively
discussing the unique uses and benefits of our L-VIS System
with high-profile advertisers. Our efforts in this area
continue to expand because of the potential benefits be
believe would result from the endorsement of our technology by
the advertising community;
- Enhancing and developing additional L-VIS System software. In
addition to enhancing our existing software for use of the
L-VIS System during football games, baseball games, soccer
games, tennis matches, ski jumping and motor sports events, we
are developing, software which would allow for the use of the
L-VIS System during the broadcast of additional sports and
other entertainment programming, including basketball games
and golf. We are also developing our new iPoint product in
order to expand the use of our technology to the Internet and
in interactive television. This type of interactivity may
become particularly interesting to the individual television
viewer when he is able to use the iPoint product to control
the specific advertising insertions he sees.
OWNERSHIP OF VIDEO INSERTION RIGHTS
In the NFL, all television, video insertion and national sponsorship
rights are controlled by the
5
<PAGE> 7
league for all regular season games, the playoffs, the Super Bowl and the
Pro-Bowl. Such rights are controlled by individual NFL teams with respect to all
pre-season games. The NFL is under contract with ABC, CBS, FOX and ESPN for the
rights to broadcast various NFL football games during the 2000 NFL season. Kagan
Associates estimated that the national network broadcasters holding rights to
NFL games in 1999 generated an aggregate of approximately $1.3 billion in
revenues through the sale of television advertisements with respect to their
broadcast of regular season and playoff games, including the 1999 Super Bowl on
FOX.
In college football, the television advertising, sponsorship and video
insertion rights to regular season games are held by various college football
conferences. The rights to the various college bowl games are owned by bowl
committees which are often non-profit corporations established to host a bowl
game. Both the conferences and the committees, like other rights holders,
contract with broadcasters for the national or local broadcast of their games.
Kagan Associates estimated that in 1999, ABC, NBC and CBS generated
approximately $229 million, $18.0 million and $48.0 million, respectively, in
advertising revenues relating to their regular season and college bowl game
broadcast rights.
MLB holds all television, sponsorship and video insertion advertising
rights with respect to regular season nationally broadcast games, the All Star
Game, playoff games, the World Series and the international distribution of
regular season games. Kagan Associates estimated that the advertising revenues
received by the four major over-the-air broadcast networks with respect to MLB
totaled approximately $322 million in 1997, $271 million in 1998 and $330
million in 1999. Generally, the local television rights, video insertion and
sponsorship rights to regular season baseball games are held individually by
each of the 30 MLB teams. Typically, each team sells to over-the-air and cable
broadcasters the broadcast and television advertising rights to individual games
or packages of multiple games for a fixed fee and solicits potential sponsors
using a media sales group. The broadcasters earn revenues through the sale of
30-second spots to local and national advertisers.
The broadcast of football, baseball and any other type of sporting event
is governed by agreements among the applicable teams, leagues, broadcasters and
the sports federation, if any. Impediments to use of the L-VIS System during the
broadcast of the sporting events covered by any of these agreements could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and the results of
our operations by limiting its acceptance and use in television programming. In
many instances, these agreements provide that different persons control the
copyrights to the broadcasts in differing circumstances, for instance, regular
season play versus playoffs. Agreements often govern permitted forms of
advertising and modifications to the broadcast. Use of live video insertion
technology is not specifically discussed in some existing agreements and under
these circumstances it is not clear whose permission must be obtained to use the
L-VIS System. If we use our L-VIS System without the permission of the
appropriate parties, such use can be challenged. The defense and prosecution of
copyright suits is both costly and time-consuming and current broadcast
copyright holders might not agree to amend current agreements to allow for or
facilitate the use of our technology on terms acceptable to us.
SALES AND MARKETING
We expect to continue to generate revenues from the sharing of
advertising revenue among ourselves, rights holders and broadcasters and, in
certain circumstances, through the licensing of our technology. As discussed
above, the right to insert electronic images for advertising purposes into a
live or pre-recorded broadcast, and hence the right to sell advertising using
the L-VIS System, is held by different groups depending, in most cases, on the
programming event or sport involved, the status of the game, i.e., pre-season,
regular season or post-season, and whether the programming or game is to be
broadcast internationally, nationally or locally. These rights may be sold for
specific programming events or games and/or entire seasons to another party,
most notably a broadcaster who pays the rights holder an up-front fee for such
rights. In each case, we must negotiate for the use of the L-VIS System with the
rights holder or holders, typically in exchange for a percentage of the
advertising revenue generated using the L-VIS System or for a contracted fee.
When the L-VIS System uses the live feed from the broadcaster
6
<PAGE> 8
to insert its electronic images, such broadcaster must also approve the use of
the L-VIS System. Accordingly, arrangements with several parties including the
rights holder and the broadcaster must be established. The L-VIS System has been
used during the broadcast of, among other events, (i) the international
broadcast of Super Bowls XXXIV, XXXIII and XXXII in January 2000, 1999 and 1998,
(ii) the CBS News' Early Show in its daily weekday news programming under a
multi-year agreement beginning in November 1999, (iii) 2000, 1999, and 1998 MLB
home games of the Philadelphia Phillies and the San Diego Padres, (iv) NFL games
during the 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 regular season and playoff games broadcast by
CBS Sports, (v) ESPN Sunday Night Baseball games during the 1999-2000 and
2000-2001 regular season, and (vi) IRL national telecasts on ABC and ESPN for
their 2000 series, including the Indianapolis 500 in May 2000. There can be no
assurance, however, that we will be successful in establishing or maintaining a
relationship with any of these parties.
The ultimate customers of our L-VIS System are expected to continue to
be advertisers, sponsors, broadcasters and rights holders. Revenues flow from
the advertisers and sponsors to the rights holders who pay a share of those
revenues to us. We provide the L-VIS System and support services to the rights
holders and we are paid by the rights holders either a percentage of the
advertising revenues derived from use of the L-VIS System or an agreed upon
fixed fee for services provided. The rights holders enter into agreements with
broadcasters to provide the services necessary for use of our L-VIS System. The
advertising space using the L-VIS System is then sold either by the rights owner
or by the broadcaster, depending on the specific arrangement between such
parties, and the advertising revenues are shared among the rights owner, the
broadcaster and us. As a result, we often rely upon the marketing and
advertising staffs of these rights holders and broadcasters, which typically
target the manufacturers or producers of nationally distributed products. The
broadcast rights holders have been only moderately successful in selling L-VIS
System advertising. If the broadcast rights holders are unable to enter into
higher paying or a greater number of arrangements with advertisers, this failure
could inhibit the growth in our revenue stream. In order to mitigate this
dependency on third parties, we are actively promoting the advantages of the
L-VIS System directly to major advertisers. We believe that promotion is
important in influencing market acceptance of the L-VIS System among potential
advertisers.
Over the past several years, we have focused our sales and marketing
efforts on those sports that account for a significant amount of the United
States or worldwide advertising and sponsorship expenditures and in a growing
number of entertainment programming applications. Following is an explanation of
our sales and marketing strategy for several of our target markets:
FOOTBALL
In football, we have developed several different applications for
advertising and the use of viewer enhancements. In one application the L-VIS
System software has been designed to insert images in the vicinity of the goal
posts either as a lead-in to commercial breaks or during field goal and
extra-point attempts. Insertions in the vicinity of the goal posts offer rights
holders the ability to sell advertising for a high visibility location where
advertising was not previously located. In another application, a line
indicating the first down line is inserted into the live event. In this case, we
provide the service to the broadcaster for a fee. This line can also be
sponsored and the sponsors' logo can appear on the line. We expect these
applications to account for substantially all of our football revenue.
During NFL pre-season in August 2000, the L-VIS System was used in games
of the Minnesota Vikings to insert promotional material and advertising in the
broadcasts. Super Bowl XXXIII in January 1999 featured PVI inserts in both the
domestic and international feeds: player introductions in the domestic feed and
three custom advertising feeds for Mexico, Canada and the world feed in
international broadcasts, including advertisements for Charles Schwab and
General Motors. The Coca-Cola Company was the exclusive sponsor during the
international broadcast of Super Bowl XXXII in January 1998 when our L-VIS
System was used to insert electronic images on their behalf.
During the regular NFL seasons in 2000 and 1999, the we used the L-VIS
technology to insert a
7
<PAGE> 9
first down line in CBS national broadcasts, including post season playoff games.
The first down line appears to be popular with the viewing audience and similar
technology could be used to put advertising on the field, in the form of a
"branded" first down line, for example, if the rights owner permits it. Although
the NFL does not permit signage in the broadcasts of its regular season games at
the present time, we continue to pursue this possibility. In 1999, we signed an
agreement with the NFL International giving us exclusive electronic insertion
rights to the NFL Europe League, the international broadcast of the domestic NFL
games including the Super Bowl game and the domestic broadcast of the Europe
League games. This agreement was renewed in April 2000 and has been extended
through the January 2002 Super Bowl.
From time to time, the L-VIS System has been used in the broadcast of
college football games. Most recently, in January 2000, the L-VIS System was
used during the ABC broadcast of the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. The ESPN
sports network first used the L-VIS System in the broadcast of football games
during the 1995 fall college football season, including its broadcasts of the
Holiday Bowl and the Peach Bowl. Since then, ESPN and ESPN2 have used the L-VIS
System to make insertions in numerous college football broadcasts. We intend to
continue to pursue additional arrangements for the use of the L-VIS System with
respect to the broadcast of NFL and college football games. However, there can
be no assurance that we will be successful in creating greater interest for use
of the L-VIS System with respect to the broadcast of either NFL or college
football games.
BASEBALL
We focused our initial marketing efforts on the local MLB market because
the advertising rights in each local market are typically held by the individual
teams in that market. This provides a greater number of potential customers than
are available in many other sports. Because a normal baseball game is divided
into 18 half-innings, advertisements can be sold by the rights holder using a
half-inning advertising unit, which enables the rights holder to know exactly
how many advertising units may be sold and what its revenues will be from the
sale of such advertising. We have negotiated and intend to continue negotiating
for the right to consent to any pricing model before its implementation.
Since its initial use on television in the 1995 broadcast of local
baseball games by Comcast Cable of New Jersey, the L-VIS System has been used by
numerous baseball teams and broadcasters. The San Diego Padres have used the
L-VIS System throughout the 1997, 1998 and 1999 MLB season and are currently
under contract to use the L-VIS System throughout the 2000 MLB season. The
Philadelphia Phillies have used our L-VIS System throughout the 1998 and 1999
MLB season for broadcasts of home games and are currently under contract for the
2000 MLB season. Prior to the 2000 MLB season, the San Francisco Giants used the
L-VIS System for broadcasts of Giants home games on the San Francisco station
KTVU and SportsChannel during the 1996-1999 MLB seasons. In addition, FOX
carried one of the Giants home games on its "Game of the Week" program during
which our L-VIS System was used. The Giants paid fees to the broadcaster for use
of the video feed required by the L-VIS System and to facilitate its
utilization.
In February 2000, ESPN contracted with us to create and insert virtual
advertisements using the L-VIS System in a minimum of twenty nationally telecast
ESPN Sunday Night Baseball Games during the 2000 season and the agreement was
expanded in August 2000 to include four additional games on the ESPN2 network.
Prior to this, we had entered into an agreement with ESPN in 1998 whereby ESPN
used the L-VIS System to insert advertising in selected Sunday Night national
broadcasts of MLB games. The first interleague game in 1998 between the New York
Mets and the New York Yankees featured advertising that we inserted. This
agreement with ESPN was renewed for the 1999 season and the L-VIS System was
used in the broadcast of the 1999 opening day game of the MLB season.
8
<PAGE> 10
We are continuing our efforts to contract with other baseball teams to
use our technology and to renew existing relationships with the individual teams
and the national broadcasters. There can be no assurance, however, that we will
be successful in creating greater interest for use of the L-VIS System in MLB.
SOCCER
Although revenues from soccer television advertising in the United
States historically have been very small, we have marketed, and intend to
continue marketing, the L-VIS System for use in soccer matches in Europe, Latin
America and Asia, where the popularity of soccer is significantly greater than
in the United States.
The basic L-VIS System was designed to insert an image onto the center
circle of a soccer field. In March 2000, our Latin American licensee, Publicidad
Virtual, S.A. de C.V., entered into a multi-year agreement with Televisa and TV
Azteca, Mexico's two largest television networks for the use of the L-VIS
System. Under the terms of the agreement, Publicidad will insert virtual
advertisements in the broadcast of a minimum of twenty Mexican National Soccer
Teams' games. The agreement includes the telecast of World Cup 2002 qualifying
games.
Beginning with the first use of our L-VIS System in soccer to insert
advertising logos during live international broadcasts of the Parmalat Cup
tournament in August 1995, the L-VIS System has been used both nationally and
internationally. RTBF, the French language national broadcaster in Belgium,
successfully used the L-VIS System in May 1996 to insert three-dimensional
images into the broadcast of the Belgian Cup. We have also used the L-VIS System
to insert logos during the December 1996 World Cup qualifying match between the
Dutch and Belgian national teams and, by a licensee to insert advertisements in
more than 400 soccer matches in Mexico.
Because it is our understanding that FIFA continues to evaluate its
position on the insertion of advertising on to the field of play, we continue to
explore ways to encourage FIFA to grant permission to use the L-VIS System in
FIFA-sanctioned matches. The L-VIS System has not been used in FIFA-sanctioned
matches to insert images on the field of play while a match is in progress.
Instead, the L-VIS System has been used before and after a match. In addition,
we have discussed using the L-VIS System to insert advertising on sideboards
during FIFA-sanctioned matches. Without the permission of FIFA, however, our
potential revenue from soccer will be substantially reduced. There can be no
assurance that FIFA will give such permission.
MOTOR SPORTS
In March 2000, the Indy Racing League ("IRL") became the first major
motor sport to utilize virtual advertising in the national telecast of their
entire 2000 racing season. The IRL races are telecast over either ABC or ESPN
and include the broadcast of the Indianapolis 500 in May 2000. The L-VIS System
has been used to insert virtual images into the natural landscape of the
broadcast, both in the middle of the field and on the race track. This deal
marked the first time a major motor sports rights holder elected to use virtual
signage in place of traditional site based signage during its broadcasts. Prior
to our entering into this agreement with the IRL, the L-VIS System was used in
several other major motor sports events including the Brickyard 400 in August
1998 and 1999.
OTHER SPORTS
Kagan Associates estimated that in 1999, 16.7% and 5.2% of the combined
sports advertising revenues generated by ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX were for
basketball and golf, respectively. We have also provided services using the
L-VIS System in other sports programming. ESPN used the L-VIS System in
international broadcasts of the 1997 and 1998 X-Games, which were taped in San
Diego. Turner Sports used the L-VIS System in its telecasts of the Goodwill
Games ski jump event in February 2000,
9
<PAGE> 11
placing a virtual line marking the length of the longest jump and an animated
virtual sign showing wind speed and direction. We are currently in discussions
with Jack Nicklaus Productions to add virtual images to certain golf events and
we have entered into an agreement with Outdoor Life Network (OLN) whereby OLN
will sell to sponsors virtual signage to be placed in cycling broadcasts.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STRATEGY
Our strategy with respect to sports and entertainment programming
originating outside of the United States is to enter into royalty and licensing
agreements either with foreign broadcast and sports marketing experts or by the
formation of foreign subsidiaries either majority or wholly owned by PVI. In
June 2000, we formed PVI Europe, a majority-owned subsidiary headquartered in
Belgium, for the purpose of marketing our L-VIS System throughout all of Europe
with the exception of Spain and Portugal.
In August 1999, we entered into a license agreement with Sistemas de
Publicidad Virtual, S.L., ("Sistemas") granting to Sistemas exclusive rights to
exploit the commercial use of the L-VIS System for television broadcasts which
originate and are intended for telecast solely within Spain and Portugal. Under
the terms of this agreement, Sistemas will pay us royalties of 30% based upon
revenues generated from use of the L-VIS System. The license agreement
terminates after five years but includes a five year renewal option. In March
1999, we renegotiated the terms of a License Agreement we had entered into with
Publicidad Virtual, S.A. de C.V. ("Publicidad") in 1993 which had granted an
exclusive, royalty-free license to use, market and sub-license the L-VIS System
throughout Mexico, Central and South America and the Spanish-speaking markets in
the Caribbean basin. As a result of the renegotiation, we now receive royalties
from Publicidad based on their net revenues. The L-VIS System has been used by
the clients of Publicidad to place insertions into broadcasts of more than 400
soccer matches, plus tennis matches, bullfights and entertainment programming
including concerts. We expect that the largest international market for the
L-VIS System will be for soccer matches and entertainment programming.
In June 2000, we terminated a license agreement which had been entered
into with Sasani Limited of South Africa in January 1999. We are currently in
discussions with several potential licensees in South Africa to continue the
work which was begun by Sasani. The L-VIS System has been used to place
insertions into broadcasts of numerous soccer matches on behalf of clients of
Sasani Limited and we will continue to explore the market potential in South
Africa as part of our strategy to become the leading provider of electronic
advertising and program enhancements worldwide.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into or maintain
favorable relationships with any partners or licensees, that any partners or
licensees will establish a market for the L-VIS System, that any relationships
will generate any revenue for us, or that any partners or licensees will act in
good faith and perform their obligations to us. To the extent that we have
entered into these exclusive arrangements in a particular market, we are
dependent upon these partners or licensees' to generate revenues for us. Their
failure could preclude us from generating material revenues in such geographical
area or with respect to a specific sport, as the case may be.
There are certain risks inherent in doing business in international
markets, such as unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and
other trade barriers, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations,
political instability, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, reduced
protection for intellectual property rights in some countries, seasonal
reductions in business activity during the summer months in Europe and certain
other parts of the world, and potentially adverse tax consequences. In addition,
we may not succeed in creating a material business internationally. We have
granted some parties exclusive rights to territories or specific sporting
events, which means that we must rely on their success in these areas. Their
failure could greatly reduce the potential growth of our international business.
10
<PAGE> 12
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
The L-VIS System is designed using a Flex-Card hardware platform. This
platform is more powerful than previous platforms and allows for re-
configuration. We have designed the Flex-Card L-VIS System to provide multiple
insertion capability, multiple camera capability and an expanded zoom range, and
we have created a simplified graphical user-based interface. See Item 7,
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Research and Development", regarding costs of research and
development in each of the last two fiscal years.
We are continuing to improve existing software for use of the L-VIS
System during the broadcast of football games, baseball games, soccer games,
tennis matches and motor sports. Further, we are developing software to permit
the use of our L-VIS System during the broadcast of basketball games and golf
and other sports. We have also made the L-VIS System available for use with
other events such as award shows, news programming, pay-per-view boxing and
concerts. We believe that there may be important applications of our technology
as it relates to these sports and entertainment programs when viewed with
interactive television and/or the Internet.
The L-VIS System can still only be used for some programs under certain
circumstances. During live events, we must have the cooperation of the
broadcaster to obtain acceptable results. In the past the L-VIS System has been
operated mainly by our personnel, but, increasingly is operated by operators
trained by us. We are working to develop additional software and hardware and
train personnel to achieve a more user-friendly product with wider potential
use.
COMPETITION
PVI knows of three international organizations that have developed and
are continuing to develop processes and equipment to pursue an advertising
business similar to our owns. These organizations are Symah Vision-SA ("Symah"),
Orad Hi Tech Systems Ltd. ("Orad") and SciDel Technologies Ltd. ("SciDel").
Symah is owned by the LaGardere Group, which controls Matra-Hachette, a large
French defense and publishing company. Symah has demonstrated its system
publicly and is actively marketing its system in Europe. We believe that Symah's
system has been used in Europe during the broadcast of over 300 sporting events.
Orad was founded in 1993 as part of the ORMAT Group, an Israeli company
originally established to create alternative energy power stations. Orad, which
is partly owned by ISL, a Swiss sports-marketing firm, has two subsidiaries,
Orad Inc. in the U.S. and Orad GmbH based in Germany. Orad's primary business is
selling virtual sets and Orad Inc. is responsible for the worldwide marketing of
Orad's virtual advertising system, "ImADgine". SciDel is a subsidiary of Scitex,
a large Israeli corporation that provides services in the electronic imaging
area primarily for the printing and publishing industries. Both the Orad and
SciDel systems have been used during some live commercial broadcasts. We believe
each of these competitors has one or more patents or patent applications
relating to real-time video insertion. Although we believe that use of the L-VIS
System does not infringe the United States or other patents of third parties,
there can be no assurance that competitors will not initiate a patent
infringement action against us (see next paragraph below). We believe that the
SciDel system violates one of our basic patents, and in June 1999, filed suit
for patent infringement in U.S. District Court in Delaware against Scidel USA
Ltd., the U.S. subsidiary of the Israeli Company, Scidel Technologies Ltd.
Scidel has responded by denying the charges and claiming that our patents are
invalid.
In addition, we are aware of one U.S. company, Sportvision, which is
using technology similar to our own for inserting viewer enhancements, such as a
first down line in football, into live television broadcasts. As far as we know,
Sportvision has not been active in the advertising part of the business. On
October 4, 1999, Sportvision and Fox Sports Productions filed suit in U.S.
District Court in San Jose, California against PVI claiming that the use of our
products infringes a recently issued patent (U.S. No. 5,917,553) which is
licensed to Sportvision. Not only do we deny infringement, but we believe the
patent licensed to Sportvision is invalid and is based on an invention actually
conceived and made by PVI.
11
<PAGE> 13
In addition to these known competitors, we expect substantial
competition from established broadcast business participants, if the market for
video insertion technology, including virtual advertisements, proves successful.
These potential competitors will likely have substantially greater financial,
technical, marketing and other resources and many more highly skilled
individuals than we do. Furthermore, such potential competitors may have greater
name recognition and extensive customer bases that could be utilized to gain
significant market share, to our detriment. Our competitors may be able to
produce superior products, including products with new features, undertake more
extensive promotional activities, offer more attractive terms to customers and
adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. There is no assurance that
we will be able to compete effectively with current or future competitors.
In addition to the products of these competitors, the L-VIS System will
compete with advertisers' use of traditional 30-second advertising spots, which
remain the standard in the television advertising industry, and traditional
signage and sponsorship programs. Our revenues will be partially dependent upon
television sports advertisers allocating a portion of their advertising budgets
to use the L-VIS System. There can be no assurance that advertisers will
allocate their advertising expenses in the manner currently anticipated by us.
Existing advertisers may be reluctant to use a new technology. Advertisers' may
not believe that their sales will increase as a result of the use of our
technology. The competition is likely to be more intense where we are competing
for television advertising and sponsorship dollars that are currently spent on
traditional media, such as 30-second spots or scrolling billboards. We need the
cooperation of the sponsorship advertising sales departments of team owners,
other rights holders and broadcasters. We rely on these entities for the sale of
our products to advertisers, buy they may have incentives to sell alternative
advertising or sponsorship inventory rather than our services. This could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The L-VIS System will also compete with advertisers' use of conventional
billboard products, including advertising placed on playing surfaces (such as
outfield walls, football fields, ice hockey rinks and soccer fields) and
scrolling billboards, physically located at the site of an event, which can
display sequentially a series of static advertisements. These scrolling
billboards are currently marketed and used in professional baseball, basketball
and other sports. These products achieve an effect that is similar to those
L-VIS System insertions that are static and two-dimensional, and their use
generally does not require broadcaster participation.
During the 1999 MLB season, 24 MLB teams had scrolling billboards
located behind home plate. The existence of these scrolling billboards and other
advertising behind home plate currently limits the marketability of the L-VIS
System in baseball. We believe that one manufacturer of scrolling billboards
used in stadiums has included restraints in its contracts that inhibit or
prohibit the use of video insertion technology in television broadcasts. Other
agreements among advertisers, sponsors, syndicators, promoters, broadcasters and
cable operators may include similar provisions. These restrictions may have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In the sports advertising arena, we continue to generate revenue
primarily by attracting new advertisers and sponsors to the sports advertising
and sponsorship market and by causing existing advertisers and sponsors to use
the L-VIS System. There can be no assurance that total advertising and
sponsorship expenditures will increase as a result of the availability of the
L-VIS System. As we continue to compete for television advertising and
sponsorship dollars that are currently allocated to traditional media, such as
30-second spots or scrolling billboards, the competition is likely to become
more intense. We will be able to compete effectively with existing advertising
and sponsorship alternatives only with the cooperation of broadcasters and the
advertising sales departments of team owners and broadcasters, on which we must
sometimes rely for sales to advertisers. Because certain L-VIS System rights
holders may also own traditional television advertising rights or sponsorship
rights, which may provide such rights holders with a greater percentage of the
revenues received from the sale of such advertising or sponsorship rights than
does the sale of L-VIS System advertisements, incentives may exist in some cases
to sell alternative advertising or sponsorship inventory prior to the sale of
L-VIS System advertising.
12
<PAGE> 14
With regard to placing images in syndicated and first run television
programs, we are generating revenue through agreements with the program rights
holders and distributors to place advertising logos or products within the
programs themselves, prior to distribution. Advertising imbedded in the program
may create conflicts with the broadcasters of the programs as it may compete
with traditional 30-second spot advertising sold by the broadcasters. This in
turn may affect our ability to develop a more robust business in this area.
In the case of program enhancements, we are making available to the
broadcasters a series of program enhancements which the broadcaster can use to
increase the audience appeal of its programs. We to get a negotiated fixed fee
for each use by the broadcaster of such enhancements. There is no assurance that
the enhancements which we have developed or may develop in the future will be of
sufficient value to the broadcasters for us to generate substantial revenue
therefrom. Furthermore, competitors may drive down the fees to levels where we
cannot cover its costs of providing the enhancement services.
Our development of products related to the Internet and potential
interactive television business is an area where a large number of creative new
companies and existing well financed companies have a significant interest. PVI
believes that its intellectual property offers an opportunity to participate
effectively in these new businesses. Our ability to play a meaningful role will
depend, in part, on our forming appropriate relationships with existing industry
players. There is no assurance that our potential products will be embraced by
the industry or that we can develop relationships necessary to create a
successful business.
MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY
We have built 41 L-VIS System units (each, an "L-VIS Unit"), of which
approximately 31 are being used from time-to-time by customers, potential
customers or foreign marketing partners. An L-VIS Unit consists of standard
electronic equipment racks, containing both standard purchased components and
our proprietary circuit boards, assembled and tested by our own personnel. We
are dependent upon a sole supplier, Lucent Technologies, for certain of the
hardware components. Although such hardware components are stock items which are
readily available to the public, there can be no assurance that Lucent will
continue to manufacture and sell the components. We are not, however, a party to
any agreement with Lucent. In order to remove the dependency on a sole supplier,
we are actively developing technology that does not rely on specific hardware
components.
REGULATIONS
We do not believe that any federal or state regulations currently
directly relate to or restrict the use of the L-VIS System. There are existing
regulations imposed on broadcasters, which may require disclosure that the L-VIS
System is being used in a particular broadcast. In addition, there can be no
assurance that there will not be any regulations or restrictions in the future,
which either directly, or indirectly through broadcaster regulations, will
adversely affect the use of the L-VIS System. Further, there can be no assurance
that regulatory agencies in foreign jurisdictions have not adopted, or will not
adopt in the future, regulations or restrictions affecting the use of the L-VIS
System. The adoption of these regulations or restrictions may reduce or
eliminate the market for our products in any country where these regulations or
restrictions are adopted. This would have a material adverse effect on the
Company's business, financial condition and results of operation.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
PATENTS
We have been assigned seven issued U.S. patents. Patent No. 5,264,933,
which relates to our
13
<PAGE> 15
basic pattern recognition video insertion technology, was issued on November 23,
1993, will expire on January 28, 2012 and was assigned to PVI on January 22,
1992. Patent No. 5,543,856, which relates to the use of remote insertion of
images that might be useful in a narrow casting application, was issued on
August 6, 1996, will expire on October 27, 2013 and was assigned to PVI on
October 22, 1993. Patent No. 5,627,915, which relates to a pattern recognition
system using templates, was issued on May 6, 1997, will expire on January 31,
2015 and was assigned to PVI on January 30, 1995. Patent No. 5,808,695, which
relates to a method of tracking scene motion for live video insertion systems,
was issued on September 15, 1998 and will expire on December 29, 2015 and was
assigned to PVI on December 27, 1995. Patent No. 5,892,554, which relates to
inserting live and moving objects in to scenes, was issued to PVI on April 6,
1999, will expire on November 28, 2015, and was assigned to PVI on March 31,
1998. Patent No. 5,953,076, which relates to techniques for occlusion
processing, was issued on September 14,1999 and will expire on June 12, 2016.
Patent No. 6,100,925, which relates to techniques for combining camera sensors
with image processing, was issued on August 8, 2000, and will expire on November
25, 2017. PVI owns all right, title and interest in each of these patents.
However, the degree of protection offered by these patents is not certain.
To date, we have filed counterpart patent applications for the seven
issued U.S. patents in the European Patent Office and in various non-European
countries around the world where it expects to do business. Four patents have
been allowed by the European Patent Office. A number of new patent applications
are pending in various countries, including the United States, and several more
patent applications are in preparation. It is possible that these pending
patents may not be issued. Any patents issued to us or our licensors in a
foreign country may provide less protection than provided in the United States.
We believe our patents will be important in our future business
dealings, since we believe that any system that is able to deliver the technical
capabilities of the L-VIS System will depend on image processing technology and
will, therefore, fall within the scope of PVI's issued patents.
The validity and/or breadth of PVI's owned and licensed patents
generally may be tested in post-allowance court proceedings. (see Competition
above). While there are two court proceedings presently underway relating to
PVI's patent property, there has been no completed court test of any of the
issued patents, the allowed patents or any of the pending applications or
foreign counterparts PVI. We are aware of other companies that have patents or
patent applications in the field of electronic video insertion technology. As is
the case with Sportvision, these companies or others may claim that we infringe
the patents or rights of such third parties, or these third parties may infringe
our patents as we believe is the case with SciDel. In either event, litigation
involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome, consequently, is
highly uncertain. Furthermore, any patent litigation entails considerable cost
to PVI, which could divert resources that otherwise could be used for its
operations and might be resolved in a manner that is unfavorable to us. No
assurance can be given that PVI or its licensors will be successful in enforcing
its rights, or that our products or processes do not or will not infringe the
patent or intellectual property rights of a third party. An adverse outcome in
the defense of any patent infringement action could subject PVI to significant
liabilities to third parties, require PVI to license disputed technology from
third parties, if possible, force it to try to redesign its products or
practices, or require it to cease selling its products. In the event PVI's owned
or licensed patents were successfully challenged in court, its business,
financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely
affected by limiting our ability to do business.
It is possible that one or more products developed by a competitor may
be marketed or used in a territory where we have patent protection. Because an
image inserted through use of video insertion technology often appears as if it
exists as a physical advertisement at the site of a sporting event, it may be
difficult to know whether, and which, video insertion technology is being used
with respect to any televised sporting event. Thus, infringement of our patents
may be difficult to monitor. Our failure to detect such an infringement may have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. In the event we become aware of a potential patent infringement, we
may be forced to
14
<PAGE> 16
litigate to enforce our patent rights. Such a situation exists with the SciDel
company, which we believe is using technology that infringes our patents. PVI
has thus instituted a suit against SciDel. Engaging in such an enforcement
action may be protracted and expensive and, therefore, have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although we do not believe that the use of the L-VIS System infringes
the United States or other patents of third parties, there can be no assurance
that competitors will not initiate a patent infringement action against us. On
October 4, 1999, Sportvision and Fox Sports Productions filed suit in U.S.
District Court in San Jose, California against PVI claiming that the use of
PVI's products infringes claims of a recently issued patent (U.S. No. 5,917,553)
which is licensed to Sportvision. Not only do we deny infringement, but we
believe that the patent is invalid and is based on an invention actually
conceived and made by us. In addition, GDM, a Spanish media company that
licensed the L-VIS System for use in broadcasts in Spain and Portugal during a
trial period which ended December 1996, received a letter from a Symah affiliate
asserting that use of the L-VIS System in Spain would infringe one of Symah's
patents. Although PVI and GDM were advised that use of the L-VIS System would
not infringe Symah's patent, there can be no assurance that Symah will not
assert infringement claims against PVI or its European licensees in the future
or against PVI in the United States for infringement of the U.S. counterpart
(U.S. Patent 5,353,392) of Symah's patent. We believe that the L-VIS System does
not infringe U.S. Patent 5,353,392 and this patent has not been asserted against
us.
If the L-VIS System were found to infringe any third party patent, we
might be required to modify the L-VIS System or enter into an arrangement to
license such patent, if possible. There can be no assurance that we would be
able, under such circumstance, to modify the L-VIS System or enter into a
license arrangement. We also rely in large part on unpatented trade secrets,
improvements and proprietary technology. Despite our efforts to safeguard and
maintain our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that we will be
successful in doing so or that our competitors will not independently develop,
gain access to our technology, reverse engineer or patent technologies that are
substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. We require our
employees and some third parties to enter into confidentiality agreements.
LICENSE GRANTS TO PVI
PVI has entered into the following license agreements relating to the
L-VIS System:
David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc.
("Sarnoff") has granted PVI a worldwide license to practice Sarnoff's technology
related to the electronic recognition of landmarks, including an exclusive
license covering the specific fields of television advertising and television
sports. We have also been granted a non-exclusive license for use of the Sarnoff
technology in all other fields relating to sports or advertising, including
video production, local video insertion, private networks, medical and
scientific applications and uses by the United States Department of Defense or
any other United States government agency. The Sarnoff license will remain in
effect until terminated by PVI, provided that PVI remains current with respect
to its royalty obligations to Sarnoff. We may terminate the license at any time.
During the term of the exclusive license for television advertising and
television sports applications, we are obligated to pay Sarnoff royalties based
upon a percentage of our gross revenues. All royalties accrue as earned, but no
cash payments were initially required to be made until the earlier of the date
on which cumulative gross revenues reached twenty million dollars or January 1,
1999. Payments for all accrued royalties through December 31, 1998 became due in
January 1999 and were paid in full by December 1999.
Additionally, under terms of this license agreement, commencing in
January 1999, minimum quarterly royalties of $100,000 became due in order to
maintain the license. For the calendar years 1999 and 2000, we had the option of
paying these minimum royalties in cash or with PVI stock at its last issue
15
<PAGE> 17
price and, accordingly, elected to issue stock for all 1999 royalties due and
for the quarters ended March 31, and June 30, 2000.
General Electric Company. General Electric Company ("GE") granted PVI a
five-year non-exclusive, worldwide license relating to all GE patents on
equipment for electronic recognition of selected landmarks; altering images in
television programs for advertising purposes; or any purpose in television
programs the principal focus of which is sports, as of July 1996. Under the
terms of the license agreement, we are required to pay royalties to GE based
upon our gross revenues.
Theseus Research, Inc. Theseus Research, Inc. ("Theseus") has granted
PVI a non-exclusive, worldwide license to use and sell Theseus' patented
technology for the warping of images in real time. During the term of the
Theseus license, we are required to pay Theseus a royalty on net sales of
products, if any, that incorporate the Theseus technology. PVI paid Theseus an
up front license fee of $50,000, which is creditable against these future
obligations. The license, which terminates with the expiration of the last of
the patents included in the licensed technology, may be terminated by PVI at any
time.
TRADEMARKS
L-VIS(TM) is a trademark of PVI. We filed a U.S. trademark registration
application for L-VIS, the mark under which we are marketing our live video
insertion products. We have settled an opposition filed against the L-VIS
trademark application. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a Notice of
Allowance, and we have filed a Statement of Use with respect to the L-VIS mark.
We believe the trademark registration will issue shortly.
C-TRAK(TM) is a trademark of PVI. We have filed a U.S. trademark
registration application for C-TRAK, the mark under which we are marketing our
electronic imaging system in which a part of the picture or image in a
prerecorded or live video signal is scanned, digitized, stored and tracked to
thereby maintain the position of one or more inserted images relative to other
parts of the main picture or image. On April 13, 1999, publication of this
application occurred, in response to which no oppositions were filed.
Accordingly, on July 6, 1999 a Notice of Allowance issued on this application.
Registration of this trademark will be completed upon our formal filing of a
Statement of Use for this mark.
COPYRIGHT AND TRADE SECRET
PVI relies upon copyright and trade secret protection to maintain the
proprietary nature of the computer software it develops that is not patented.
These steps may not protect our trade secrets, know how or other proprietary
information.
EMPLOYEES
As of September 15, 2000, we had 65 full-time employees, 25 of whom were
engaged in, or directly supported, PVI's hardware and software research,
development and product engineering activities, 18 of whom assemble and operate
L-VIS Systems, 12 of whom were engaged in marketing activities and 10 of whom
were engaged in administrative activities. In addition, we utilize part-time
employees and outside contractors and consultants as needed. None of our
employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe our relations with
our employees are good. Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain
qualified financial, technical, marketing and other management personnel for
which we face competition.
We depend on a number of key technical and management employees,
including:
- Brown F Williams, our Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board;
- Dennis P. Wilkinson, our President and Chief Executive Officer;
- Samuel A. McCleery, our Vice President, Business Development;
- Lawrence L. Epstein, our Vice President of Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer;
- Paul Slagle, our Vice President of Sales and Marketing;
16
<PAGE> 18
- Howard J. Kennedy, our Vice President of Convergence, and
- Gene Dwyer, our Vice President, Chief Technology Officer.
If one or more of these individuals leaves us, our ability to conduct
operations may be materially and negatively affected. We face competition for
these personnel. We have employment agreements with Messrs. Williams, Wilkinson,
McCleery, Epstein and Slagle. Although our employees sign confidentiality and
non-competition agreements, our key personnel might leave us and work for a
competitor. We also rely on consultants to assist us in research and development
strategy. Our consultants are employed by third parties and may have commitments
to others that may limit their availability.
Currently, each of our employees is required to execute an agreement
pursuant to which he or she assigns to PVI all patent rights and technical or
other information which pertain to PVI's business and are developed by the
employee during his or her employment with PVI, and agrees not to disclose any
trade secret or confidential information without the prior consent of PVI.
ADDITIONAL RISKS
Investment in our common stock involves a substantial risk of loss.
Before making an investment in our common stock, you should carefully read this
annual report on Form 10-K and other documents filed by us with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. You should give particular attention to the various
risks identified throughout this annual report on Form 10-K, including the
following risk factors. You should recognize that other significant risks may
arise in the future which we cannot foresee at this time. Also, the risks that
we now foresee might affect us to a greater or different degree than expected.
WE MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET IF WE FAIL TO MEET CERTAIN
MAINTENANCE CRITERIA AND THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK COULD BE ADVERSELY
AFFECTED IF WE BECOME GOVERNED BY REGULATIONS GOVERNING LOW PRICE STOCKS.
Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. The continued
listing of our common stock is conditioned upon our meeting certain asset, stock
price and other criteria. If we fail any listing criteria, our common stock may
be delisted. The effects of delisting include limited news coverage and the
limited release of the market prices of our common stock. Delisting may diminish
investors' interest in our common stock, restrict the trading market and reduce
the price for our common stock. Delisting may also restrict us from issuing
additional securities or securing additional financing.
Companies with low price stocks are governed by additional federal and
state regulatory requirements and could lose an effective trading market for
their stock. For instance, if our common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq
National Market and the trading price of our common stock is less than $5.00 per
share, our common stock could be governed by Rule 15g-9 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. This rule requires that broker-dealers satisfy special
sales practice requirements before any transaction, including suitability
determinations and receiving any purchaser's written consent. The additional
burdens imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting
transactions in our common stock. This would reduce the liquidity of our common
stock. If these rules become applicable to our common stock, they could have a
material adverse effect on the trading market for our common stock. In addition,
our common stock could be deemed "penny stock" under the Securities Enforcement
and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. If this occurs, additional disclosure will
be required if you wish to make a trade in our common stock. The disclosure
includes the delivery of a disclosure schedule explaining the nature and risks
of the penny stock market. These requirements could severely limit the liquidity
of our common stock and the ability of purchasers to sell their shares of our
common stock in the secondary market.
FUTURE SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK IN THE PUBLIC MARKET COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
STOCK PRICE
17
<PAGE> 19
AND OUR ABILITY TO RAISE FUNDS IN NEW STOCK OFFERINGS.
The market price of our common stock could drop as a result of sales of
a large number of shares of our common stock in the marketplace, or the
perception that the sales could occur. These factors could also make it more
difficult for us to raise money through future offerings of securities.
As of June 30, 2000, 9,879,568 shares of our common stock were
outstanding. Of these shares, 4,600,000 were sold through our initial public
offering and are freely transferable under the Securities Act of 1933. An
additional 1,592,727 were registered for sale by certain of our shareholders.
400,000 shares of our common stock are issuable upon exercise of some warrants
and will be freely transferable pursuant to a registration statement on Form
S-3, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 907,130 shares are
issuable upon exercise of other outstanding warrants and will be "restricted
securities" as defined under Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Finally,
2,160,000 shares of our common stock, which may be issued under our 1993 Amended
Stock Option Plan, have been registered by us by filing a registration statement
on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
"Restricted securities" may be sold only under Rule 144 or under an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act or an exemption from
the registration requirement. As of September 15, 2000, almost all shares of our
outstanding common stock were eligible for resale under Rule 144, including Rule
144(k).
We granted some demand and piggyback registration rights to the holders
of 3,583,652 shares of our common stock and to the holders of warrants
exercisable for an aggregate of 1,307,130 shares of our common stock, including
the 400,000 shares underlying the warrants held by the representatives of the
several underwriters of our initial public offering and the 200,000 shares
underlying the warrants issued to the placement agent in our 1999 private
placement. These registration rights require us to register under the Securities
Act those shares of our common stock and the shares of our common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants. If the holders, by exercising their registration
rights, cause a large number of shares to be registered and sold in the public
market, the sales could have a material adverse effect on the market price for
our common stock.
THE PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY CONTINUE TO BE HIGHLY VOLATILE.
The market prices of equity securities of technology companies,
including our common stock, have experienced substantial price volatility in
recent years for reasons both related and unrelated to the individual
performance of specific companies. Accordingly, the market price of our common
stock may continue to be highly volatile. Factors such as announcements by us or
our competitors concerning the following matters may have a significant impact
on the market price of our common stock and could cause it to fluctuate
substantially:
- products;
- patents and technology;
- governmental regulatory actions;
- events affecting technology companies generally; and
- general market conditions.
In addition, there are a relatively small number of shares of our common
stock trading publicly. Accordingly, our shareholders may experience difficulty
selling or otherwise disposing of their shares of common stock at favorable
prices, or at all. If we raise money by selling stock or convertible debt
securities, our current shareholders could experience substantial dilution. In
addition, the securities could have greater rights, preferences and privileges
than those held by our common shareholders.
18
<PAGE> 20
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND THERE CAN BE NO
ASSURANCE THAT THESE RIGHTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO PROTECT OUR TECHNOLOGY
We must maintain the proprietary nature of our technology to compete
effectively. We have been assigned seven issued United States patents and four
allowed European patents. We have licensed several other patented technologies
from third parties and we have filed applications for a number of patents in the
United States and abroad. However, the degree of protection offered by these
patents is not certain and the pending patents may not be issued. Any patents
issued to us or our licensors in a foreign country may provide less protection
than provided in the United States. Competitors may obtain patents that
interfere with our ability to make L-VIS System units and to market the L-VIS
System. Competitors may intentionally infringe our patents. Competitors or
strategic partners may copy or independently develop technologies that are the
same or similar to our technologies.
Our patents may be challenged in court proceedings. There has been no court test
of our patents or patent applications. We are aware of other companies that have
patents or patent applications relating to video insertion technology. Other
companies may claim that we infringe their patents or rights. These companies
may infringe our patents. Patent litigation involves complex legal and factual
issues. The outcome of such actions is highly uncertain. In addition, patent
litigation involves considerable costs. We cannot assure you that we do not or
will not infringe the patent or intellectual property rights of another company.
If we lose a patent infringement action, we may be required to pay a significant
amount of money or to stop selling our products. We may also need to license
disputed technology from another company, if possible. If our patents are
successfully challenged, our business, financial condition and the results of
our operations will be adversely affected.
We also rely on unpatented trade secrets, improvements and proprietary
technology. Others may copy or independently develop similar technology or gain
access to our technology. We require our employees and some third parties to
enter into confidentiality agreements. We also use copyright, trademark and
trade secret protection. These steps may not protect our trade secrets, know-how
or other proprietary information.
OUR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND EXISTING 5% SHAREHOLDERS HAVE SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE
OVER OUR AFFAIRS AND MAY DELAY OR PREVENT A CHANGE IN CONTROL OF US.
As of June 30, 2000, our executive officers and directors, together with
entities affiliated with these individuals, and other holders of five percent or
more of our outstanding capital stock beneficially owned over 27% of our common
stock, assuming the exercise of all vested stock options and warrants.
Effectively, these shareholders will be able to elect a majority of our
directors, will have the voting power to approve all matters requiring
shareholder approval and will continue to have significant influence over our
affairs. This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control of our company. As of June 30, 2000, Allen &
Company Incorporated was the beneficial owner of 11.76% of our common stock.
Enrique F. Senior, one of our directors, is an Executive Vice President and
Managing Director of Allen & Company Incorporated and as such may be deemed to
be the beneficial owner of 12.14% of our common stock, which includes the shares
of our common stock beneficially owned by Allen & Company Incorporated. These
factors could lead to conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand, and
Allen & Company Incorporated and/or Mr. Senior, on the other hand. In the event
any conflict of interest arises between us and Allen & Company Incorporated or
Mr. Senior in the future, we intend that the issue will be resolved by a
majority of directors who do not have a personal interest in the issue.
We issued a total of 262,000 shares of our common stock, or 2.7% of the
shares of our common stock outstanding on June 30, 2000, to Brown F Williams and
Samuel A. McCleery as a result of the exercise of warrants in July 1997. The
total number of shares issued to these individuals was in exchange for
promissory notes. In December 1997 we lent money to Mr. Williams and Mr.
McCleery to allow them to pay the tax liabilities they each incurred as a result
of the exercise of their warrants in July 1997. They
19
<PAGE> 21
executed additional promissory notes in December 1997 for these loans. All of
these promissory notes were outstanding as of June 30, 2000. Mr. Williams and
Mr. McCleery have significant influence over our affairs. Among other effects,
this influence could result in a delay of payment by Mr. Williams and Mr.
McCleery to us.
OUR ABILITY TO UTILIZE OUR INCOME TAX LOSS CARRYFORWARDS TO OFFSET POSSIBLE
FUTURE CORPORATE INCOME WILL BE SEVERELY LIMITED BY THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.
As a result of our initial public offering of our common stock in
December 1997, we underwent an additional "ownership change" within the meaning
of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code, upon undergoing the ownership change, our right to use
existing net operating loss carryforwards is limited during each future year to
a percentage of the fair market value of our outstanding capital stock
immediately before the ownership change. As of June 30, 2000, we had net
operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately
$39,480,000. These net operating loss carryforwards expire in the years 2006
through 2020. The timing and manner in which we may use the net operating loss
carryforwards to offset possible future corporate income will be severely
limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.
OUR ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED STOCK AND THE NEW JERSEY SHAREHOLDER PROTECTION ACT
COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
Our board of directors may issue up to 1,000,000 shares of our preferred
stock in one or more series and may determine the price, rights, preferences and
privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by our
shareholders. We may issue up to 167,000 shares of our Series A preferred stock
and 93,300 shares of our Series B preferred stock. At June 30, 2000, 67,600
shares of our Series A preferred stock were outstanding and 86,041 shares of our
Series B preferred stock were outstanding. As the result of a preferred stock
exchange which closed in August 2000 (see Note 12 of Notes to the FInancial
Statements), only 11,363 shares of the Series A preferred and 12,834 of the
Series B preferred remained outstanding at the time of filing. As a holder of
our common stock, you may be negatively affected by the rights of the holders of
our preferred stock. The issuance of additional shares of our preferred stock
would provide flexibility for possible acquisitions and other corporate
purposes. However, our preferred stock can also be used to delay, defer or
prevent a change in control and, thus, entrench our existing management. We are
governed by the anti-takeover provisions of the New Jersey Shareholder
Protection Act. This act restricts certain business combinations with interested
shareholders for five years following the date the person becomes an interested
shareholder, unless the board of directors approves the business combination.
These provisions could adversely affect the value of our common stock since they
delay and deter unsolicited takeover attempts.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
We currently lease 21,000 square feet of office space in two neighboring
buildings in Lawrenceville, New Jersey. The Lawrenceville facility is our main
operations center, including product, hardware and software design,
manufacturing and product assembly, product test and documentation, post
production and graphics, customer training and customer technical support. The
leases in Lawrenceville expire in September 2002. We are currently leasing
temporary office space in New York City while we undertake a search for more
permanent facilities for our marketing personnel.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In June 1999 we filed suit for patent infringement in U.S. District
Court in Delaware against Scidel USA Ltd., the U.S. subsidiary of the Israeli
Company, Scidel Technologies Ltd. We contend that Scidel's video imaging system
for electronically inserting advertising into live television broadcasts
infringes on PVI's U.S. Patents No. 5,264,933 and 5,892,554. PVI seeks a
permanent injunction prohibiting
20
<PAGE> 22
infringement of our patents. Although it is not possible to determine the
ultimate outcome of this matter, it is management's opinion that the resolution
of this issue will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In October 1999, we filed a request with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office ("USPTO") to correct the ownership of US Patent 5,917,553,
licensed to Sportvision, Inc. We believe that the basic subject matter of this
patent belongs to PVI. After we filed this action, Sportvision, Inc. filed a
lawsuit against us for infringement of the disputed US Patent 5,917,553.
Sportvision, Inc. is seeking injunctive relief and compensation including
damages. Based upon our preliminary assessment of the claim, we believe that we
are the owner of the basic subject matter of the disputed patent and that the
claim lacks merit. We plan to vigorously defend our ownership of the patent.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF THE SECURITIES HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS.
(a) Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol "PVII." The following table sets forth, for the calendar periods
indicated, the range of high and low sale prices for our common stock on the
Nasdaq National Market:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period High Low
<S> <C> <C>
1998 3rd Quarter............................ $ 6 $ 2-5/16
4th Quarter............................ 6-5/16 1-15/16
1999 1st Quarter............................ $ 5-31/32 $ 3-1/16
2nd Quarter............................ 8-3/4 4-1/2
3rd Quarter............................ 6-31/32 3-3/16
4th Quarter............................ 9 4-3/4
2000 1st Quarter............................ $ 14-1/2 $ 7
2nd Quarter............................ 8 3-7/8
</TABLE>
As of September 15, 2000, there were 387 holders of record of our common
stock, with beneficial shareholders in excess of 400. On September 15, 2000, the
last sale price reported on the NASDAQ National Market for the common stock was
$4.875 per share. The market prices of equity securities of technology
companies, such as PVI, have experienced substantial price volatility in recent
years for reasons both related and unrelated to the individual performance of
specific companies. Future sales of restricted securities (as defined under Rule
144 of the Securities Act of 1933 as amended), common stock under PVI's Stock
Option Plan, and outstanding warrants, in the public market could adversely
affect the stock price and our ability to raise funds in new stock offerings. To
date, the trading volume of our common stock has remained relatively small. As a
result, shareholders may experience difficulty selling or otherwise disposing of
shares of common stock at favorable prices, or at all.
The continued listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market
will be conditioned upon our meeting certain asset, stock price and other
criteria set forth by such quotation system. If we fail to meet any listing
criteria, our common stock may be delisted from quotation on such system. The
effects of delisting include limited news coverage and the limited release of
the market prices of our common stock. Delisting may diminish investors'
interest in our common stock, restrict the trading market
21
<PAGE> 23
and reduce the price for our common stock. Delisting may also restrict us from
issuing additional securities or securing additional financing.
Companies with low price stocks are governed by additional federal and
state regulatory requirements and could lose an effective trading market for
their stock. For instance, if our common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq
National Market and the trading price of our common stock is less than $5.00 per
share, our common stock could be governed by Rule 15g-9 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. This rule requires that broker-dealers satisfy special
sales practice requirements before any transaction, including suitability
determinations and receiving any purchaser's written consent. The additional
burdens imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting
transactions in our common stock. This would reduce the liquidity of our common
stock. If these rules become applicable to our common stock they could have a
material adverse effect on the trading market for our common stock. In addition,
our common stock could be deemed "penny stock" under the Securities Enforcement
and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. If this occurs, additional disclosure will
be required if you wish to make a trade in our common stock. The disclosure
includes the delivery of a disclosure schedule explaining the nature and risks
of the penny stock market. These requirements could severely limit the liquidity
of our common stock and the ability of purchasers to sell their shares of our
common stock in the secondary market.
We have neither paid nor declared any dividends on the common stock
since its inception. We expect to retain all earnings, if any, generated by our
operations for the development and growth of our business and do not anticipate
paying any cash dividends to our shareholders in the foreseeable future. The
payment of future dividends on the common stock and the rate of such dividends,
if any, will be determined in light of any applicable contractual restrictions
limiting our ability to pay dividends, our earnings, financial condition,
capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of
Directors. Furthermore, pursuant to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
we are prohibited from paying any dividends on the common stock until all
accumulated dividends in respect of the Series A preferred stock and Series B
preferred stock have been paid. As of June 30, 2000, the accrued dividends with
respect to the shares of Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock
totaled $135,750 and $165,612, respectively.
We are required to redeem the Series A preferred stock on a pro rata
basis, at a price of $4.50 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, out
of 30% of the amount, if any, by which our annual net income after taxes in any
year exceeds $5 million, as shown on our audited financial statements. Subject
to the prior redemption of all of the Series A preferred stock, we are required
to redeem the Series B preferred stock, on a pro rata basis, at a price of $5.00
per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends out of 20% of the amount, if
any, by which our annual net income after taxes in any year exceeds $5 million,
as shown on our audited financial statements.
In July 2000, we offered all shareholders of the Series A preferred
stock and Series B preferred stock the opportunity to exchange their shares of
preferred stock for shares of our common stock. The transaction closed on August
17, 2000 and 56,237 shares of the Series A preferred and 73,207 shares of the
Series B preferred were exchanged for 70,256 and 97,313 shares, respectively, of
PVI common stock. See Note 12 of Notes to Financial Statements.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
We have selected the following data derived from our consolidated
financial statements that have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
independent accountants. The information set forth below is not necessarily
indicative of the results of future operations and should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
appearing elsewhere in this report.
22
<PAGE> 24
Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of Operations
Data:
Total revenue 3,045,899 1,222,213 696,012 211,634 1,009,600
Total costs and expenses 16,793,462 11,852,061 8,828,106 6,026,383 5,157,187
Operating loss (13,747,563) (10,629,848) (8,132,094) (5,814,749) (4,147,587)
Interest expense -- -- (1,814,178) -- --
Interest and other 705,919 975,850 861,948 84,088 237,063
income
Net loss applicable to
common stock (12,488,758) (9,698,048) (9,128,374) (5,774,711) (3,954,574)
Basic and diluted net
loss per share (1.33) (1.18) (1.55) (2.18) (1.74)
Weighted average number
of shares
- basic and diluted 9,374,317 8,186,207 5,890,530 2,653,546 2,266,973
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash 8,388,148 12,494,373 21,552,627 775,693 1,506,709
equivalents
Accounts receivable 829,329 378,652 193,262 86,993 --
PPE, net 3,685,068 3,806,718 2,547,484 1,266,806 1,226,570
Intangible assets, net 587,486 547,546 493,236 388,754 452,720
15,724,808 18,891,118 25,426,365 2,761,216 6,448,969
Total assets
Redeemable preferred 1,035,767 991,655 947,605 903,555 859,505
stock
Total stockholders'
(deficit)/equity 9,273,396 12,143,330 22,034,347 (1,004,951) 3,491,862
Other Data:
Capital expenditures 1,727,557 2,513,898 2,093,702 523,221 879,958
</TABLE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the other financial
information included elsewhere in this report.
OVERVIEW
Since our inception in 1990, we have devoted substantially all of our
resources to developing and marketing the L-VIS(TM) System, an electronic video
insertion system based on patented proprietary technology designed to modify
broadcasts to television viewers by inserting electronic video images, primarily
advertisements and program enhancements. We have incurred substantial operating
losses since our inception and as of June 30, 2000, we had an accumulated
deficit of approximately $50,725,000. This deficit is the result of research and
development expenses incurred in the development and commercialization of the
L-VIS System expenses related to field testing of the L-VIS System and its
deployment pursuant to customer contracts, operating expenses relating to
manufacturing, our sales and marketing activities, and general administrative
costs. We expect to incur losses in the next fiscal year as we continue to roll
out our business strategy of developing new products and increasing our
penetration of both the domestic and international markets in the field of
real-time virtual image insertion.
23
<PAGE> 25
We intend to focus our efforts on increasing market acceptance of the
L-VIS System by continuing to develop software applications, such as animated
insertions in event video streams, the virtual first-down line in football and
the virtual finish-line in horseracing, virtual product placement in
pre-recorded programming and Internet applications which will allow television
viewers to interact with live or recorded video programming. In order to
increase our revenue generating user base and to expand into national and
international markets, we continue to transition from a technology company to an
international marketing company. Our sales and marketing staff is responsible
not only for reaching agreements with teams, leagues and broadcasters, but also
for promoting the L-VIS System to advertisers in order to create market
awareness and acceptance and to negotiate with potential licensees in yet
untapped markets worldwide. While purchases of advertising will typically be
done through the rights holder or the broadcaster, we hope to create advertiser
interest and demand by promoting the L-VIS System directly to potential
advertisers as well as third party licensees. Therefore, we expect to incur
substantial additional losses and to experience substantial negative cash flow
from operating activities through the next 12 months or until such later time as
we achieve revenues sufficient to finance our ongoing capital expenditures and
operating expenses. Our ability to produce positive cash flow will be determined
by numerous factors, including our ability to reach agreements with, and retain,
customers for use of the L-VIS System, as well as various factors outside of our
control.
We expect to continue generating revenue from ads sold by rights holders
that use the L-VIS System. These revenues are expected to be shared with the
rights holders. Accordingly, in order to generate revenues from the use of the
L-VIS System, we will need to enter into agreements with rights holders. The
agreements can take various forms, including revenue sharing agreements under
which we receive a percentage of the fee paid by the advertisers and contractual
arrangements whereby we receive an agreed upon fee for our services. We realize
revenues when the advertisement runs over the air or the contractual services
are provided. Due to the seasonal nature of sporting events, the revenue
generated from the insertion of advertising or program enhancements in sports
programming will fluctuate seasonally. This seasonality is moderated by the
multi-sport capabilities of the L-VIS System and its increasing use in
entertainment and other non-sports related programming.
In addition to the revenue arising from advertising and contractual
arrangements, a second revenue source is the strategic licensing of the L-VIS
System to third parties. These licenses may be territorial in nature or they may
cover individual major broadcast events. In the case of a territorial license,
the licensee is responsible for generating business within the territory and we
share in the business through one or more means including royalties, license
fees, and/or equity participation in the licensee. In the case of individual
events, we receive a flat fee or a fee based on revenues generated by the
licensee, depending on the nature of the license.
A third revenue source are the services provided by the L-VIS System
which support the electronic insertion of visual aids in live sports and
entertainment programming, such as a virtual first-down line in football games,
a virtual finish-line in horse races, animated graphics in the broadcast of
Super Bowl XXXIII, and the use of logo and name branding during live weekday
news programming. We also offer an advanced post-production product whereby the
L-VIS System technology can place products or logos within existing,
pre-recorded television programs, movie scenes or live television broadcasts. We
realize revenues through contractual arrangements to provide these visual
enhancement services.
Because our operations relate to the continuing development and
marketing of the L-VIS System, we work to convince advertisers, broadcasters and
broadcast rights holders of the value of the L-VIS System. If we do not generate
enough revenues, we will have to either raise additional money or substantially
reduce the scale of our operations. We may not be able to obtain additional
financing on acceptable terms, or at all. If we cannot raise money, our
business, financial condition and the results of our operations will be
adversely affected.
24
<PAGE> 26
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
1999
REVENUES. Revenues include receipts from advertising use of the L-VIS
System, contractual arrangements made with customers for visual program
enhancements, and license and royalty fees earned from use of the L-VIS System
outside the United States. Total revenue increased 149% to $3,045,899 during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 ("Fiscal 2000") from $1,222,213 for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1999 ("Fiscal 1999"). Of this total, advertising and
production revenue increased 117% to $1,508,664 in Fiscal 2000 from $694,528 in
Fiscal 1999 primarily as a result of the increased use of the L-VIS System by
MLB during the 1999 and 2000 baseball seasons, revenues earned from CBS Sports
for the insertion of the virtual first down line in the national broadcast of
1999-2000 and 2000-2001 NFL regular season and playoff games, and contractual
revenues earned for program enhancement services provided to CBS News in the
live television broadcast of its CBS Early Show. Other factors contributing to
the increase included the use of the L-VIS System by the Indy Racing League in
the broadcast of their 2000 series auto races and by Turner Network Television
in its broadcast of the 2000 Winter Goodwill Games. Royalties and license fees
increased 191% to $1,537,235 from $527,685 in fiscal 1999 as a result of a
significant increase in royalties received from Publicidad Virtual. Due to the
restructuring of our licensing agreement with Publicidad we now receive a share
in the revenues they generate. In addition, the use by Canwest Global
Communications of the L-VIS technology in Canadian television broadcasts and by
Sasani Limited in South Africa contributed to the increase.
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and
travel expenses of sales and marketing personnel, sales commissions, public
relations, promotion, support personnel and allocated operating costs. Total
sales and marketing expenses increased 62% to $4,127,494 in Fiscal 2000 from
$2,545,738 in Fiscal 1999. This increase resulted primarily from non-cash
compensation charges incurred in relation to the issuance of options for
marketing consulting services, license fees paid to obtain certain international
broadcast and programming rights, and an increase in marketing personnel to
support our continued focus on the sales and marketing of the L-VIS System.
During Fiscal 2000 we also instituted a commission program for sales and
marketing executives, and increased our participation in trade shows, thus
adding to the increased expenses.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT COSTS. Product development expenses include the
costs associated with all personnel, materials and contract personnel engaged in
research and development activities to increase the capabilities of the L-VIS
System hardware platforms, including platforms for overseas use, and to create
improved software programs for individual sports and program enhancement
services. Total product development expenses increased 86% in Fiscal 2000 to
$2,802,249 from $1,508,875 in Fiscal 1999 due primarily to a shift in the
allocation of new and existing engineering and management personnel to
deployment of new applications of our core technology, including our post
production product for use in entertainment programming. Also contributing to
the increase were the costs associated with the ongoing development of our
iPoint product which will allow television viewers to interact with live or
recorded video programming delivered to the home via the Internet or interactive
television.
FIELD OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT. Field operations and support expenses
include the costs associated with the material production, depreciation and
operational support of the L-VIS System units, including training costs for
operators and the shipping of L-VIS System units to international and domestic
venues and support of the L-VIS Systems in the field. Field operations and
support expenses increased 27% in Fiscal 2000 to $5,641,355 from $4,431,759 in
Fiscal 1999 as a result of several principal factors. Depreciation expense
increased significantly as a result of the manufacture of additional L-VIS
Systems and our purchase of several mobile production trucks. The costs
associated with program enhancement services we provided for the live television
broadcast of the CBS Early Show as well as for the broadcast of the Indy Racing
League 2000 auto racing series, were also significant components of the
increased expenses in Fiscal 2000 over Fiscal 1999. Other cost increases
resulted from increased activity in Europe
25
<PAGE> 27
and our use of the L-VIS System in the ABC broadcast of the Rose Bowl in January
2000.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Total general and administrative costs
increased 25% in Fiscal 2000 to $4,222,364 from $3,365,689 in Fiscal 1999
primarily as a result of the increased legal fees we are paying to increase our
patent portfolio and protect our patent property. In addition, we incurred
non-recurring legal, accounting and incorporation fees during the process of
forming PVI Europe, and continued to increase our investor relations activity
relating to our continuing effort to increase market awareness of the L-VIS
System technology.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME. Interest and other income decreased 28% to
$705,919 for Fiscal 2000 from $975,850 for Fiscal 1999 as a result of the lower
cash balances we had available for investment.
TAX BENEFIT. The tax benefit increased to $596,998 from $0 for Fiscal
2000 and 1999, respectively, as a result of the sale of a portion of our state
net operating loss and research and development tax credits. The sale was made
under a plan developed by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority in 1999
and was not available during the year ended June 30, 1999.
NET LOSS. As a result of the foregoing factors, our net loss increased
29% to $12,444,646 for Fiscal 2000 from $9,653,998 for Fiscal 1999.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
1998
REVENUES. Total revenue increased 76% to $1,222,213 during the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1999 ("Fiscal 1999") from $696,012 for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1998 ("Fiscal 1998"). Of this total, advertising and production revenue
increased 114% to $694,528 in Fiscal 1999 from $324,789 in Fiscal 1998 primarily
as a result of (i) an increase in the number of major league baseball teams
using the L-VIS System and the amount of advertising revenues produced from each
team, and (ii) the initial use of the L-VIS System for the electronic insertion
of the virtual first-down market in various NFL football games broadcast live by
CBS Sports. Also contributing to the increase was the increased usage of the
L-VIS System for post-production activities by inserting electronic images into
taped programming, the initial use of the L-VIS System in the NFL Europe World
Bowl, and our use of a virtual finish-line in several NTRA events. Revenues from
license and royalty fees increased 42% to $527,685 in Fiscal 1999 from $371,223
in Fiscal 1998 principally as a result of the restructuring of our licensing
agreement with Publicidad Virtual S.A. de C.V. allowing us to share in revenues
generated by Publicidad, and the signing of Sasani Limited as our exclusive
licensee in South Africa.
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses increased 50% to
$2,545,738 in Fiscal 1999 from $1,693,587 in Fiscal 1998, principally as a
result of license fees we paid to obtain certain international broadcast and
programming rights. Also contributing to the higher costs were increased market
research, trade show and public relations activity undertaken to support our
focus on the sales and marketing of the L-VIS System.
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Product development expenses decreased 12% to
$1,508,875 in Fiscal 1999 from $1,719,703 in Fiscal 1998 as a result of the
continued shift in spending from the development of an enhanced search system
for the basic L-VIS System platform and other ongoing research and development
projects to product costs. This shift was due to the December 1997 attainment of
technological feasibility of a flex board based L-VIS System, resulting in the
capitalization of flex board purchases made in Fiscal 1999 to upgrade all
existing L-VIS Systems. Flex related purchases had been expensed in Fiscal 1998
during the development phase. Research and development expenses incurred during
Fiscal 1999 continue to reflect the our efforts to develop new software and
hardware platforms for the L-VIS System through the integration of newly
available technologies including the Internet and High Definition Television or
HDTV.
26
<PAGE> 28
FIELD OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT. Field operations and support costs
increased 80% to $4,431,759 in Fiscal 1999 from $2,456,019 in Fiscal 1998 for
several reasons. Among the principal causes were an increase in depreciation
expense associated with the purchase of L-VIS System components for system
upgrades and newly constructed systems to be used in both domestic and
international venues, and an increase in personnel and related overhead
expenses. Other factors contributing to the increase were the costs we incurred
with the testing and initial use of the L-VIS System for the electronic
insertion of the virtual first-down marker in various NFL games broadcast by CBS
Sports, costs associated with our use of the L-VIS System in both the
international and domestic broadcast of Super Bowl XXXIII, and increased license
fees we pay based on contractual minimums or revenues earned.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. Total general and administrative costs
increased 14% in Fiscal 1999 to $3,365,689 from $2,958,797 in Fiscal 1998 as a
result of our hiring additional executive and accounting personnel as well as
the increased legal and accounting expenses we incurred relating to the
preparation of our post-effective amendment filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in November 1998. These increases were partially offset by a
decrease in charges associated with option and warrant grants.
INTEREST AND OTHER FINANCIAL EXPENSE. Interest and other financial
expense decreased to $0 in Fiscal 1999 from $1,814,178 in Fiscal 1998 as the
interest costs incurred in connection with our October 1997 bridge loan
financing were paid in full in December 1997.
INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME. Interest and other income increased 13% to
$975,850 in Fiscal 1999 from $861,948 in Fiscal 1998 as a result of the full
year effect of increased funds available to invest from the proceeds of the
Bridge Loan in October 1997 and the initial public offering of our common stock
in December 1997. Also included in Fiscal 1999 were net proceeds in the amount
of $96,800 from the Stock Purchase Agreement settlement between the PVI,
Presencia and Eduardo Sitt.
NET LOSS. As a result of the foregoing factors, our net loss increased
6% to $9,653,998 in Fiscal 1999 from $9,084,324 in Fiscal 1998.
YEAR 2000 RISK COMPLIANCE
During the year ended June 30, 2000, we undertook actions intended to
assure that our computer systems and other equipment are capable of functioning
in, and processing for, periods for the Year 2000 and beyond. Through September
2000, we have not experienced any adverse consequences resulting from the
ability of our computer systems to correctly identify "00" as the year "2000"
rather than "1900" (the "Y2K" problem). We did not suffer any interruption of
service within our offices or in the services rendered to our clients as a
result of the Y2K compliance issues.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have incurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows in
each year since we commenced operations, due primarily to the costs of
developing, testing and building L-VIS Systems, and operating expenses relating
to our sales and marketing activities. Since our inception, we have primarily
financed our operations from (i) the net proceeds of approximately $27,900,000
from private placements of common stock, warrants and redeemable preferred
stock, (ii) the payment of a $2,000,000 licensing fee by Presencia in
consideration of the license we granted to Publicidad, (iii) the proceeds of a
bridge loan financing which closed in October 1997, (iv) the proceeds from the
initial public offering of our common stock which closed in December 1997, (v)
revenues and license fees relating to use of the L-VIS System, (vi) investment
income earned on cash balances and short term investments, and (vii) the sale of
a portion of our state net operating loss and research and development tax
credits.
27
<PAGE> 29
As of June 30, 2000, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8,388,148, a
decrease of $4,106,225 from the balance at June 30, 1999. Net cash used in
operating activities increased to $9,307,098 in Fiscal 2000 from $5,689,333 in
Fiscal 1999 in large part due to the increased net operating loss, increased
accounts receivable and the paydown of certain accrued liabilities. This cash
usage was partially offset by an increase in our non-cash expenses including
depreciation, amortization and compensation charges associated with stock and
option grants. Depreciation expense increased 48% to $1,849,189 in Fiscal 2000
from $1,249,235 in Fiscal 1999 as a result of the increased number of L-VIS
Systems and mobile production trucks we placed in service for both domestic and
international use. Amortization of intangibles increased to $1,512,480 in Fiscal
2000 from $911,103 in Fiscal 1999 due to our purchase of certain electronic
imaging license rights which are being amortized over their term. Compensation
charges increased to $860,862 in Fiscal 2000 from $129,973 in Fiscal 1999 as the
result of option awards given to third party marketing consultants for their
services, charges associated with the vesting of options awarded to the Board of
Directors, and stock issued for license rights.
Net cash used in investing activities increased 18% to $3,353,746 for
the year ended June 30, 2000 from $3,045,978 during the prior year period as a
result of our investment in Pineapplehead Limited, an Australian company
involved in the virtual advertising business. In addition, we are required to
make periodic payments during fiscal years ending June 30, 1999 through 2002
totaling approximately $3,200,000 as payment for certain electronic imaging
license rights. Of this total, we paid $1,300,000 during Fiscal 2000.
Net cash proceeds from financing activities increased to $8,554,619 in
Fiscal 2000 from $(322,943) in Fiscal 1999, as a result of the receipt of net
proceeds of approximately $8,200,000 from a private equity offering of our
common stock. The exercise of options by current and former employees and
payments received from related parties for outstanding notes also contributed to
the increase in cash proceeds.
As of June 30, 1999, we had cash and cash equivalents of $12,494,373, a
decrease of $9,058,254 from June 30, 1998. Net cash used in operating activities
decreased to $5,689,333 in Fiscal 1999 from $8,483,778 in Fiscal 1998, however,
due in large part to increased non-cash expenses including depreciation,
amortization and unearned revenue. Depreciation expense increased a significant
58% to $1,249,235 in Fiscal 1999 from $793,043 in Fiscal 1998 as a result of the
increased number of L-VIS Systems built for both domestic and international use.
Amortization of intangibles increased to $911,103 in Fiscal 1999 from $76,143 in
Fiscal 1998 due to our purchase of certain electronic imaging license rights
which are being amortized over their term. Unearned revenue increased due to
increased international activity in Latin America and South Africa. Charges
associated with option and warrant grants decreased in Fiscal 1999 to $129,973
from $473,562 in Fiscal 1998.
Net cash used in investing activities increased 30% to $3,045,978 for
the year ended June 30, 1999 from $2,336,324 during the prior year period as a
result of increased capital expenditures for the purchase of both components
used in the building of additional L-VIS Systems and the upgrade of existing
systems to the second generation flex-based L-VIS System. In addition, we are
required to make periodic payments during fiscal years ending June 30, 1999 and
2000 totaling approximately $2,000,000 as payment for certain electronic imaging
license rights. Of this total, $400,000 was paid during Fiscal 1999.
Net cash proceeds from financing activities decreased to $(322,943) in
Fiscal 1999 from $31,597,036 in Fiscal 1998, for several reasons. Cash provided
during the year ended June 30, 1998 was the result of the collection of stock
subscriptions receivable, the exercise of warrants issued in connection with a
bridge financing and the proceeds from our initial public offering of common
stock in December 1997. In Fiscal 1999 we used these cash balances to fund
operations and did not close any additional capital raising activities.
We believe that our existing available cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments will be
28
<PAGE> 30
sufficient to meet our operating and capital needs for a period of twelve
months, although there can be no assurance that we will not require additional
funds sooner. Our actual working capital requirements will depend on numerous
factors, including the progress of our research and development programs, our
ability to maintain our customer base and attract new customers to use the L-VIS
System, the level of resources we are able to allocate to the development of
greater marketing and sales capabilities, technological advances, and the status
of our competitors. We expect to incur costs and expenses in excess of expected
revenues during the ensuing fiscal year as we continue to execute our business
strategy by adding to our sales and marketing management force in order to
strengthen our relationships with rights holders, broadcasters and advertisers.
There is no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow from
our operations to liquidate liabilities as they become due. Accordingly, we may
require additional funds to meet our planned obligations through June 30, 2001
and may seek to raise such amounts through a variety of options. These include
future cash from operations, proceeds from equity financings, proceeds from
equipment financing lease arrangements and the potential sale of tax benefits
relating to our net operating losses. Additional funding may not be available
when needed or on terms acceptable to us, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If
adequate funds are not available, planned operations will be scaled back
resulting in the delay or reduction of personnel and planned expenditures. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of these uncertainties.
As of June 30, 2000, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal
income tax purposes of approximately $39,480,000 which expire in the years 2006
through 2020. Based upon our initial public offering of common stock in December
1997, we have undergone an additional "ownership change" within the meaning of
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Under
Section 382 of the Code, upon undergoing an ownership change, our right to use
our then existing net operating loss carryforwards as of the date of the
ownership change is limited during each future year to a percentage of the fair
market value of our then outstanding capital stock immediately before the
ownership change and if other ownership changes have occurred prior to this
ownership change, the utilization of such losses may be further limited. The
timing and manner in which we may utilize the net operating loss carryforwards
in any year will be limited by Section 382 of the Code.
EFFECT OF INFLATION
Domestic inflation has not had a significant impact on our sales or
operating results. However, inflation may have an impact upon business in a
number of international markets.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We do not have material exposure to market risk from market risk
sensitive instruments. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relates to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest income we can earn
on our investment portfolio. Under our current policies, we do not use interest
rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We
ensure the safety and preservation of invested principal funds by limiting
default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We reduce default risk by
investing in investment grade securities. A hypothetical 100 basis point drop in
interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not
significantly affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial
instruments at June 30, 1999 or June 30, 2000. Declines in interest rates over
time will, however, reduce our interest income.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item 7
are appended to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A list of the financial
statements filed herewith is found at "Index to Financial Statement and
Schedules" on page F-1.
29
<PAGE> 31
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not Applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
For information concerning this Item, see the information under
"Election of Directors," "Executive Officers" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial
Owner Reporting Compliance" in our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 5, 2000, which
information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
For information concerning this Item, see the information under
"Executive Compensation" in our Proxy Statement to be filed with respect to the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 5, 2000, which information
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
For information concerning this Item, see the information under
"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in our Proxy
Statement to be filed with respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held on December 5, 2000, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
For information concerning this Item, see the information under "Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions" in our Proxy Statement to be filed with
respect to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 5, 2000,
which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, LISTS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) Exhibits.
The exhibits required to be filed pursuant to this Item 14(a) are listed
on the "Index to Exhibits" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
We did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June
30, 2000.
30
<PAGE> 32
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
By: /s/ Brown F Williams
-----------------------
Brown F Williams
Chairman of the Board
Date: September 27, 2000
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this
report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURES TITLE DATE
---------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Brown F Williams Chairman of the Board September 27, 2000
-------------------- (principal executive officer)
Brown F Williams
/s/ Dennis P. Wilkinson President, Chief Executive Officer September 25, 2000
----------------------- and Director
Dennis P. Wilkinson
/s/ Lawrence L. Epstein Chief Financial Officer and September 25, 2000
----------------------- Treasurer
Lawrence L. Epstein (principal financial officer)
/s/ John B. Torkelsen Director September 25, 2000
---------------------
John B. Torkelsen
/s/ Lawrence Lucchino Director September 26, 2000
---------------------
Lawrence Lucchino
/s/ Jerome J. Pomerance Director September 15, 2000
-----------------------
Jerome J. Pomerance
/s/ Enrique B. Senior Director September 15, 2000
---------------------
Enrique B. Senior
/s/ Eduardo Sitt Director September 19, 2000
----------------
Eduardo Sitt
/s/ Donald P. Garber Director September 27, 2000
--------------------
Donald P. Garber
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE> 33
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit
Number Description
------ -----------
<S> <C>
3.1 -- Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which
became effective on December 16, 1997).
3.2 -- Restated Bylaws, as amended (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, filed on February 14,
2000).
10.1 -- Form of Employee Confidentiality, Invention Assignment and
Non-Compete Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.2 -- Form of Consultant Confidentiality, Invention Assignment and
Non-Compete Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.3* -- Research Agreement dated November 1, 1990 between the Company
and David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc., as amended by
Agreement dated August 9, 1991, letter dated July 1, 1992,
Letter Agreement dated July 9, 1992, letter dated November 30,
1992 and Agreement dated June 26, 1995 and effective as of
December 31, 1993 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.4* -- License Agreement dated as of July 24, 1996 between the
Company and the General Electric Company (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which
became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.5 -- Letter Agreement dated May 1, 1993 between the Company and
Grupo Sitt, as amended by Letter Agreement dated June 25, 1993
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No.
333-37725) which became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.6 -- License Agreement dated as of March 1, 1994 between the Company
and Publicidad Virtual, S.A. de C.V. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.7 -- License Agreement dated December 18, 1995 between the Company
and Theseus Research, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.8 -- Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement
dated as of February 2, 1996, as amended by agreement dated
October 20, 1997 and by agreement dated October 30, 1997
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No.
333-37725) which became
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE> 34
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
effective on December 16, 1997).
10.9+ -- Employment Agreement dated January 24, 1997 between the
Company and Brown F Williams (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.11 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.10+ -- Employment Agreement dated March 4, 1997 between the Company
and Samuel A. McCleery (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.13 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on December
16, 1997).
10.11 -- Lease Agreement dated July 16, 1997 between the Company and
Princeton South at Lawrenceville One (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which
became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.12 -- Nonrecourse Promissory Note dated July 31, 1997 of Brown F
Williams in favor of the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.13 -- Pledge Agreement dated July 31, 1997 between the Company and
Brown F Williams (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration
No. 333-37725) which became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.14 -- Nonrecourse Promissory Note dated July 31, 1997 of Samuel A.
McCleery in favor of the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on
December 16, 1997).
10.15 -- Pledge Agreement dated July 31, 1997 between the Company and
Samuel A. McCleery (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2
(Registration No. 333-37725) which became effective on December
16, 1997).
10.16 -- Assignment dated January 22, 1992 by Roy Jonathon Rosser and
Martin Leach to the Company regarding a patent (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-37725) which
became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.17 -- Assignment dated October 22, 1993 by Roy Jonathon Rosser and
Brown F Williams to the Company regarding a patent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No.
333-37725) which became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.18 -- Assignment dated January 30, 1995 by Roy Rosser, Subhodev Das,
Yi Tan and Peter von Kaenel to the Company regarding a patent
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No.
333-37725) which became effective on December 16, 1997).
10.19+ -- Employment Agreement, dated as of February 5, 1998, between
the Company and Lawrence Epstein (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11,
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE> 35
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998).
10.20* -- Letter Agreement dated November 5, 1998 between the Company
and CBS Sports, a division of CBS Broadcasting, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
November 17, 1998).
10.21+ -- Employment Agreement dated November 23, 1998 between the
Company and Dennis P. Wilkinson (Incorporated by reference to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 2, 1998).
10.22 -- Amendment Agreement dated January 1, 1999 between the Company
and Publicidad Virtual, S.A. de C.V. amending the License
Agreement dated March 1, 1994 (Incorporated by reference to
the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 1999).
10.23 -- Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 1, 1999 between the
Company, Presencia en Medios, S.A. de C.V. and Eduardo Sitt.
(Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 5, 1999).
10.24* -- Binding Letter of Intent between NFL International, a division
of NFL Enterprises L.P., and the Company, executed on January
6, 1999 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended December 31, 1998, filed on February 12, 1999).
10.25* -- System License Agreement dated January 19, 1999 between
Sasani Limited and the Company (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended December 31, 1998, filed on February 12,
1999).
10.26* -- Letter Agreement, dated July 19, 1999, between the Company and
CanWest Global Communications Corporation (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 18, 1999).
10.27* -- Agreement dated August 9, 1999, between the Company and CBS
Sports, a division of CBS Corporation (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 28, 1999).
10.28 -- Agreement dated August 31, 1999, between the Company and
Sistemas de Publicidad Virtual, S.A. de C.V. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 filed on
November 15, 1999).
10.29+ -- Employment Agreement dated September 30, 1999, between the
Company and Paul Slagle (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1999, filed on November 15, 1999).
10.30 -- Form of Subscription Agreement dated October 20, 1999 between
the Company and various subscribers (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, filed on February 14,
2000).
</TABLE>
34
<PAGE> 36
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
10.31 -- Placement Agency Agreement dated October 13, 1999 between the Company and Allen & Company
Incorporated (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, filed on February 14, 2000).
10.32 -- Warrant Certificate dated October 20, 1999 issued to Allen & Company Incorporated
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, filed on February 14, 2000).
10.33 -- Amended 1993 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, filed on February
14, 2000).
10.34 -- Letter Agreement dated April 21, 2000 between the Company and NFL International, a
division of NFL Enterprises, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, filed on May
12, 2000).
23.1 -- Consent of Independent Accountants
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
-----------
* Confidentiality has been granted with respect to a portion of this exhibit.
+ Denotes a management contract or compensation plan or arrangement
required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 14(a) of this Form 10-K.
35
<PAGE> 37
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
June 30, June 30,
2000 1999
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 8,388,148 $ 12,494,373
Restricted marketable securities held to maturity 60,847 138,000
Securities available for sale 846,167 --
Trade accounts receivable 829,329 378,652
License rights 600,000 1,166,667
Other current assets 198,568 177,097
------------ ------------
Total current assets 10,923,059 14,354,789
Property and equipment, net 3,685,068 3,806,718
Intangible assets, net 587,486 547,546
Other assets 529,195 182,065
------------ ------------
Total assets $ 15,724,808 $ 18,891,118
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 4,135,060 $ 4,300,499
Unearned revenue 293,819 436,162
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 4,428,879 4,736,661
Unearned revenue 630,033 1,019,472
Other liabilities 45,150 --
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 5,104,062 5,756,133
------------ ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Redeemable preferred stock:
Cumulative, Series A, conditionally redeemable, $4.50 par value, authorized
167,000 shares; issued and outstanding 67,600 shares at June 30, 2000,
redemption value equal to carrying value (par plus all accrued but unpaid
dividends) 439,950 421,700
Cumulative, Series B, conditionally redeemable, $5.00 par value,
authorized 93,300 shares; issued and outstanding 86,041 shares at June 30,
2000, redemption value equal to carrying value (par plus all accrued but
unpaid dividends) 595,817 569,955
------------ ------------
Total redeemable preferred stock 1,035,767 991,655
Minority interest 311,583 --
Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, no par value; $.005 stated value; authorized 40,000,000
shares; 9,879,568 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2000 49,395 40,996
Additional paid-in capital 60,575,678 51,535,488
Less: Related party notes receivable (973,322) (1,153,278)
Other comprehensive income 346,167 --
Accumulated deficit (50,724,522) (38,279,876)
------------ ------------
Total shareholders' equity 9,273,396 12,143,330
------------ ------------
Total liabilities, redeemable preferred stock
and shareholders' equity $ 15,724,808 $ 18,891,118
============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-1
<PAGE> 38
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended
June 30,
------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Royalties and license fees $ 1,537,235 $ 527,685 $ 371,223
Advertising and production revenue 1,508,664 694,528 324,789
------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenue 3,045,899 1,222,213 696,012
Costs and expenses:
Sales and marketing 4,127,494 2,545,738 1,693,587
Product development 2,802,249 1,508,875 1,719,703
Field operations and support 5,641,355 4,431,759 2,456,019
General and administrative 4,222,364 3,365,689 2,958,797
------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses 16,793,462 11,852,061 8,828,106
Operating loss (13,747,563) (10,629,848) (8,132,094)
Interest and other financial (expense) -- -- (1,814,178)
Interest and other income 705,919 975,850 861,948
------------ ------------ ------------
Loss before tax benefit (13,041,644) (9,653,998) (9,084,324)
Tax benefit 596,998 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss (12,444,646) (9,653,998) (9,084,324)
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,112) (44,050) (44,050)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss applicable to common stock $(12,488,758) $ (9,698,048) $ (9,128,374)
============ ============ ============
Basic and diluted net loss per share ($ 1.33) ($ 1.18) ($ 1.55)
============ ============ ============
Weighted average number of shares outstanding 9,374,317 8,186,207 5,890,530
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
<PAGE> 39
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended
June 30,
--------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $(12,444,646) $ (9,653,998) $ (9,084,324)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in operating activities
Recognition of unearned income (548,557) 34,190 (371,223)
Depreciation expense 1,849,189 1,249,235 793,043
Amortization of intangibles/license rights 1,512,480 911,103 76,143
Charges associated with stock, warrant and option grants 860,862 129,973 473,562
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:
Trade accounts receivable (450,677) (185,390) (106,269)
Other current assets (21,471) 53,151 (192,715)
Other assets 2,868 89,127 (142,074)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (83,494) 1,400,934 418,340
Unearned revenue 16,775 278,200 53,500
Customer deposits -- (425,000)
Miscellaneous other (427) 4,142 23,239
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in operating activities (9,307,098) (5,689,333) (8,483,778)
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of held-to-maturity investments -- (61,997)
Proceeds from held-to-maturity investments 77,153 -- --
Purchase of securities available for sale (500,000) -- --
Purchases of property and equipment (1,495,146) (2,513,898) (2,093,702)
Purchases of license rights (1,300,000) (400,000) --
Purchase of intangible assets (135,753) (132,080) (180,625)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (3,353,746) (3,045,978) (2,336,324)
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE> 40
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ended
June 30,
--------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from Bridge Financing promissory notes -- -- 1,353,000
Repayments of Bridge Financing promissory notes -- -- (1,353,000)
Proceeds from sale of Bridge Financing warrants, net -- -- 1,479,822
Proceeds from sales of common stock, net 8,310,869 5,837 29,022,227
Cash advanced for related party notes receivable 179,956 (328,780) (169,498)
Lease obligation 63,794 -- --
Collections of stock subscriptions receivable -- -- 1,264,485
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 8,554,619 (322,943) 31,597,036
------------ ------------ ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (4,106,225) (9,058,254) 20,776,934
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 12,494,373 21,552,627 775,693
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 8,388,148 $ 12,494,373 $ 21,552,627
============ ============ ============
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid in connection with Bridge financing loan $ -- $ -- $ 1,647,000
Fair value of warrants/stock issued in settlement of accrued obligation $ -- $ 100,445 $ 97,074
Exercise of warrants in exchange for related party notes receivable $ -- $ -- $ 655,000
Stock issued for royalty payments $ 332,164 $ 51,787 $ --
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE> 41
Princeton Video Image, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' (Deficit)/Equity
For the years ended June 30, 1998, 1999 and 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Related Party
Common Stock Additional Note and
Number of Paid-In Stock Subsc
Shares Amount Capital Receivable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1997 2,938,440 $ 14,692 $ 19,910,396 $(1,388,485)
Net Loss
Warrant exercises 608,062 3,040 762,154 (655,000)
Compensation expense 473,562
Issuance of warrants and stock for services 97,074
Receipt of proceeds from stock subscriptions 1,264,485
Issuance of 36,970 shares with respect to anti-dilution in
July 1997 36,970 185 (185)
Issuance of 300,000 warrants in connection with October 1997
Bridge Financing, net 1,479,822
Issuance of 4,600,000 shares of common stock at $7.00 per
share in connection with the initial public offering, net
of offering costs 4,600,000 23,000 28,889,033
Cash advanced and shares reacquired in connection with
related party notes receivable, December 1997 (9,920) (50) (123,950) (45,498)
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,050)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1998 8,173,552 40,867 51,443,856 (824,498)
Net Loss
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises 11,541 58 5,779
Issuance of common stock for license rights, April 1999,
$7.031 per share 14,286 71 100,374
Compensation expense associated with the issuance of 8,279
options for consulting services from October 1998 to
June 1999 29,529
Related party notes receivable issued in connection with
delivery of L-VIS Systems to licensee (328,780)
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,050)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1999 8,199,379 40,996 51,535,488 (1,153,278)
Net Loss
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
Shareholders'
Comprehensive Accumulated Equity
Income (Deficit) (Deficit)
------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1997 $ -- $(19,541,554) $ (1,004,951)
Net Loss (9,084,324) (9,084,324)
Warrant exercises 110,194
Compensation expense 473,562
Issuance of warrants and stock for services 97,074
Receipt of proceeds from stock subscriptions 1,264,485
Issuance of 36,970 shares with respect to anti-dilution in
July 1997 --
Issuance of 300,000 warrants in connection with October 1997
Bridge Financing, net 1,479,822
Issuance of 4,600,000 shares of common stock at $7.00 per
share in connection with the initial public offering, net
of offering costs 28,912,033
Cash advanced and shares reacquired in connection with
related party notes receivable, December 1997 (169,498)
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,050)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1998 -- (28,625,878) 22,034,347
Net Loss (9,653,998) (9,653,998)
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises 5,837
Issuance of common stock for license rights, April 1999,
$7.031 per share 100,445
Compensation expense associated with the issuance of 8,279
options for consulting services from October 1998 to
June 1999 29,529
Related party notes receivable issued in connection with
delivery of L-VIS Systems to licensee (328,780)
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,050)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 1999 -- (38,279,876) 12,143,330
Net Loss (12,444,646) (12,444,646)
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE> 42
Princeton Video Image, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' (Deficit)/Equity
For the years ended June 30, 1998, 1999 and 2000
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Related Party
Common Stock Additional Note and
Number of Paid-In Stock Subsc
Shares Amount Capital Receivable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises 30,318 151 81,567
Issuance of common stock for royalty payments 57,144 284 331,880
Issuance of stock at $5.50 per share in connection with
private equity financing, net of expenses 1,592,727 7,964 8,221,187
Compensation expense associated with the issuance of options
for consulting services provided by third parties and the
Board of Directors 449,668
Receipt of payments on notes outstanding 179,956
Unrealized gain on securities held for sale
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,112)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2000 9,879,568 49,395 60,575,678 (973,322)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
Shareholders'
Comprehensive Accumulated Equity
Income (Deficit) (Deficit)
------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises 81,718
Issuance of common stock for royalty payments 332,164
Issuance of stock at $5.50 per share in connection with
private equity financing, net of expenses 8,229,151
Compensation expense associated with the issuance of options
for consulting services provided by third parties and the
Board of Directors 449,668
Receipt of payments on notes outstanding 179,956
Unrealized gain on securities held for sale 346,167 346,167
Accretion of preferred stock dividends (44,112)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2000 346,167 (50,724,522) 9,273,396
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE> 43
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION:
Princeton Video Image, Inc. ("the Company"), was incorporated on July 23, 1990
in the State of New Jersey. The Company has developed and is marketing a
real-time video insertion system (the "L-VIS(TM) System") that through patented
computer vision technology places computer-generated electronic images into
television broadcasts of sporting events and other programming. These electronic
images range from simple corporate names or logos to sophisticated multi-media
3-D animated productions. The L-VIS System has been used to insert images,
including advertising images and visual aids, into live and pre-recorded
television broadcasts. The Company is developing a series of products for the
Internet and interactive television to allow viewers to interact with live or
recorded video programming. The Company is also marketing its systems on a
worldwide basis through licensing and royalty agreements and the formation of
Princeton Video Image Europe, N.V. ("PVI Europe"), a majority-owned subsidiary
headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. Prior to the fiscal year ended June 30,
1999, the Company was considered a development stage company for financial
reporting purposes.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Princeton Video
Image, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary, Princeton Video Image Europe,
N.V. ("PVI Europe"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of petty cash on hand, checking accounts,
money market funds, and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a
maturity of three months or less.
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
At June 30, 2000, certain marketable securities have been categorized as
available for sale and, as a result, are stated at fair value in accordance with
Statement of Financial Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities". Unrealized gains and losses are included in
shareholders' equity as other comprehensive income.
INVESTMENTS
Investments in which the Company had a majority interest or otherwise exercised
significant influence were accounted for on the basis of the equity method of
accounting.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets. The estimated useful lives of the L-VIS
Systems and their components are three years, office and research and
development equipment and software is five years, and furniture and fixtures is
estimated to be seven years. Gains or losses on depreciable assets retired or
sold are recognized in the statement of operations in the year of disposal.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of", all long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
LICENSE RIGHTS
License rights are amortized over the shorter of the license term or the
estimated useful life of the rights granted and are reviewed for impairment
whenever events or circumstances occur which indicate recorded cost might not be
recoverable.
F-7
<PAGE> 44
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Legal costs and filing fees incurred to apply for patents are capitalized and
amortized using the straight line method over an estimated useful life of 7
years.
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected
to reverse.
REVENUE
Non-refundable license fees are recognized as revenue when earned, which is when
all related commitments have been satisfied (see Note 7). Additionally, under
the terms of certain existing agreements, the Company retains title to the L-VIS
System and receives a non-refundable fee which reflects reimbursement for the
construction cost of the system delivered to the licensee. These fees are
recorded as license revenue on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the
license term or useful life of the equipment.
Advertising revenue is recognized when earned, which is when the respective
advertisements are inserted into a television broadcast.
Royalties are earned from licensees based on agreed upon percentages of revenues
earned by the licensees. Minimum royalties are recognized as revenue in the
quarter earned and amounts in excess of contractual minimums are recorded in the
subsequent period.
Production revenue is earned from fees paid by broadcasters for static and
animated visual enhancements of sporting and other events. This type of revenue
is recognized when earned, which is when the enhancement is inserted into a live
or pre-recorded television broadcast.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Costs associated with
the development of the Company's proprietary computer system which are incurred
prior to technological feasibility are recorded as research and development
expenses. Total research and development costs incurred during the fiscal years
ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were not material.
PER SHARE DATA
In December 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share" ("SFAS 128") to calculate net loss per
share applicable to common stock. SFAS 128 requires the presentation of basic
and diluted per share amounts. Basic per share amounts are computed by dividing
net loss applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share amounts are computed by
dividing net loss applicable to common stock by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of common share equivalents.
Since the Company incurred net losses for all periods presented, both basic and
diluted per share calculations are the same. Accordingly, options and warrants
to purchase 3,722,487, 2,765,315 and 2,519,637 shares of common stock that were
outstanding at June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, were not included in
diluted per share calculations, as their effect would be antidilutive.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
To conform to the June 30, 2000 presentation we reclassified certain amounts for
previous years.
F-8
<PAGE> 45
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The Company is subject to a number of risks common to companies in similar
stages of operations including, but not limited to, the lack of assurance of the
marketability of the product, intense competition, including entry of new
competitors and products into the market, the risk of technological
obsolescence, the limited source of supply of certain components of the L-VIS
System, and the need to raise additional funds to support its business
operations. The Company believes that its existing available cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet its operating
and capital needs for a period of twelve months, although there can be no
assurance that the Company will not require additional funds sooner. The
Company's actual working capital requirements will depend on numerous factors,
including the progress of the Company's research and development programs, the
Company's ability to maintain its customer base and attract new customers to use
the L-VIS System, the level of resources the Company is able to allocate to the
development of greater marketing and sales capabilities, technological advances,
the ability of the Company to protect its patent portfolio and the status of its
competitors. The Company expects to incur costs and expenses in excess of
expected revenues during the ensuing fiscal year as the Company continues to
execute its business strategy by continuing to search for new markets in which
to market its technology, both domestically and abroad, and to strengthen
existing relationships with rights holders, broadcasters and advertisers.
There is no assurance the Company will generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to liquidate liabilities as they become due. Accordingly, the Company
may require additional funds to meet planned obligations through June 30, 2001
and may seek to raise such amounts through a variety of options. These include
future cash from operations, proceeds from equity financings, and the potential
sale of tax benefits relating to the Company's net operating losses. Additional
funding may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. If adequate funds are not available, planned operations
will be scaled back resulting in the delay or reduction of personnel and planned
expenditures. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates made by
management include the future recoverability of the L-VIS System costs.
NEW PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133").
This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. It requires recognition of all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measurement
of those instruments at fair value. Gains and losses resulting from changes in
the fair values of those derivatives would be accounted for depending on the use
of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The effective
date of this standard was delayed via the issuance of SFAS No. 137. The
effective date for SFAS No. 133 is now for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2000, although earlier adoption is encouraged and retroactive application is
prohibited. The effect of adopting this standard is not expected to be material.
In December 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101,
"Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements". The SEC delayed the effective
date of this SAB in June 2000, so that the SAB must now be adopted by December
31, 2000. The Company does not expect SAB No. 101 to have a material impact on
its results of operations or financial position.
F-9
<PAGE> 46
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. RESTRICTED MARKETABLE SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY:
At June 30, 1999 the Company had investments in U.S. Treasury Notes which, at
the time of purchase, had a maturity greater than three months but less than one
year and are restricted as to use under the terms of two existing letters of
credit. In May 2000, one of the letters of credit expired and the related U.S.
Treasury Note was redeemed upon maturity. The Company intends to hold the
remaining debt instrument to maturity and has, accordingly, classified it as
marketable securities held to maturity at its amortized cost basis. Unrealized
holding losses at June 30, 1998, 1999 and 2000 were not material.
4. INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARY:
In June 2000, the Company formed PVI Europe in partnership with Interactive
Media, N.V. PVI Europe was incorporated under Belgian law for the purpose of
marketing the Company's patented proprietary L-VIS System in Europe. Total costs
incurred in fiscal year ended June 30, 2000 related to the legal formation of
PVI Europe amounted to $159,480. The Company owns 90% and Interactive Media,
N.V. owns 10% of PVI Europe capital stock. For its 90% ownership, the Company
contributed the license rights to use its proprietary L-VIS System, as well as
the required L-VIS System equipment (See Note 7). Interactive Media, N.V.
contributed computer, video and office equipment. PVI Europe recorded a net loss
of $247,000 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.
5. INVESTMENTS
In June 2000, the Company invested $500,000 in the initial public offering of
Pineapplehead Limited, an Australian company whose primary business is to
provide sport production enhancements to both Australian and U.S. broadcasters
through computer generated graphics. At June 30, 2000, the market value of the
investment was $846,167. The unrealized gain on the investment is included in
other comprehensive income at June 30, 2000. (See Note 2 on Marketable
Securities)
6. LICENSE RIGHTS
On April 21, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with NFL International,
a division of NFL Enterprises, L.P., retroactively effective to February 1,
2000. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company was granted exclusive rights
to use electronic insertion technology in certain NFL International broadcasts
of NFL/NFLEL games during the 2000 and 2001 season and non-U.S. telecasts of
Super Bowl XXXV and XXXVI, and is obligated to pay certain fees in connection
with these rights. This agreement extended a previous agreement between the
Company and NFL International which lasted one year and ended with Super Bowl
XXXIV. The Company recorded an intangible asset and a corresponding liability on
its balance sheet for the acquisition of the license rights under both
agreements. These rights are amortized on a straight line basis and payments are
made over the term of the license agreements according to a pre-determined
payment schedule. As of June 30, 2000 and 1999, the amortization expense with
respect to these rights totaled $1,416,669 and $833,333, respectively. A total
of $1,300,000 and $400,000 in cash payments were made during the years ended
June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively and the remaining accrued balance payable
was $1,500,000 and $1,600,000 at June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively. At June
30, 2000, the long term portion of the license rights, $350,000, was recorded in
Other assets.
7. LICENSE AND ROYALTY FEES:
Under the terms of certain existing agreements, the Company retains title to the
L-VIS System and receives a non-refundable fee which reflects the construction
cost of the L-VIS system delivered to the licensee. These fees are recorded as
license revenue on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the license term or
the useful life of the equipment. Recognition of license revenue related to
these agreements amounted to $548,557, $340,185 and $271,223 for the years ended
June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The remaining unearned revenue
related to these agreements was $923,852 at June 30, 2000, of which $293,819 was
current, and $1,455,634 at June 30, 1999, of which $436,162 was current.
F-10
<PAGE> 47
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
In June 2000, the Company terminated a license agreement which had been entered
into with Sasani Limited in January 1999. Under the terms of this agreement, the
Company received a non-refundable licensing fee reflecting the cost of one L-VIS
System, and minimum royalties based on use of the L-VIS System in South Africa.
Upon termination of the license agreement, the Company recorded as revenue the
remaining balance of the unrecognized non-refundable license fee of $105,000.
This amount was included in the total license revenue of $548,557 referenced in
the preceding paragraph. The Company continues to explore the market potential
in South Africa.
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
The costs and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment at June 30 are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Furniture and fixtures $ 264,659 $ 221,446
Leasehold improvements 91,824 29,053
Office equipment 1,743,481 1,195,292
L-VIS Systems 3,257,338 2,041,504
Research and development equipment and software 503,174 505,010
Vehicles 87,930 --
Equipment under construction 2,328,015 2,648,387
----------- -----------
Total property and equipment 8,276,421 6,640,692
Less: accumulated depreciation (4,591,353) (2,833,974)
----------- -----------
Property and equipment, net $ 3,685,068 $ 3,806,718
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Depreciation expense amounted to $1,849,189, $1,249,235 and $793,043 for the
years ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
9. INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
The costs and accumulated amortization of intangible assets at June 30 are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Patents $ 513,869 $ 313,391
Patent Applications in Progress 340,737 454,756
--------- ---------
Total intangible assets 854,606 768,147
Less: accumulated amortization (267,120) (220,601)
--------- ---------
Intangible assets, net $ 587,486 $ 547,546
========= =========
</TABLE>
Amortization expense amounted to $95,813, $77,770 and $76,143 for the years
ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. On September 15, 1998 the
Company was granted a U.S. patent relating to a method of tracking scene motion
for live video insertion systems. On November 14, 1999, the Company was issued a
patent by the European Patent Office that covers the Company's right to send
insertion information downstream along with a broadcast or webcast, thus
allowing the Company to insert advertisements or program enhancements from
remote locations, for example a set top box in a television viewer's home.
On August 8, 2000 the Company was issued a patent by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office that covers technology used to stabilize the physical
location of virtual images, like advertisements, inserted into television
broadcasts.
F-11
<PAGE> 48
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30 consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Accounts payable $1,258,056 $1,747,178
License fees and royalties 1,625,215 1,769,221
Legal and accounting fees 348,683 92,544
Other 903,106 691,556
---------- ----------
$4,135,060 $4,300,499
========== ==========
</TABLE>
11. INCOME TAXES:
Temporary differences which give rise to significant deferred tax assets and
liabilities at June 30, 2000 and 1999 are as follows:
<TABLE>
Deferred tax assets: 2000 1999
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Capitalized start-up costs $ -- $ 211,523
Fixed assets 409,496 668
Deferred revenue and other 457,227 612,265
NOL Carryforward - Federal 13,424,134 10,305,628
NOL Carryforward - State taxes 3,522,398 2,891,905
Valuation allowance - Federal (14,095,008) (10,947,747)
Valuation allowance - State (3,522,398) (2,891,905)
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets 195,849 182,337
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangibles 195,849 182,337
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax liabilities 195,849 182,337
Net deferred taxes $ -- $ --
============ ============
</TABLE>
Due to the uncertainty of the realization of the deferred tax assets, a full
valuation allowance has been provided.
As of June 30, 2000, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for U.S.
federal income tax purposes of approximately $39,480,000 which expire in the
years 2006 through 2020. The timing and manner in which the net operating loss
carryforward may be utilized in any year by the Company will be limited by
Internal Revenue Code Section 382.
In July 1999, the Company filed an application with the New Jersey Economic
Development Authority ("NJEDA")to sell approximately $2.1 million of its unused
Net Operating Loss carryover ("NOL") and unused Research and Development ("R&D")
Tax credits for 75% of the value of the tax benefits. Under the terms of this
NJEDA program, the proceeds of the sale had to be used by the Company for the
purchase of fixed assets, working capital and any other expenses determined by
the NJEDA to be in conformity with the NJ Emerging Technology and Biotechnology
Financial Assistance Act. The final determination of the amount to be received
by the Company was subject to adjustment by the State of New Jersey based on the
amount of the total applications received. In December 1999, the Company
F-12
<PAGE> 49
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
sold $795,997 of its total $1,812,019 of state tax benefit of unused state Net
Operating Loss carryover ("NOL") and unused Research and Development ("R&D") tax
credits and received $596,998, or 75% of the value of the tax benefits as
guaranteed under the program. This amount was recognized as an income tax
benefit by the Company in December 1999. An application to sell approximately
$2.1 of the Company's remaining unused NOL's in the NJEDA's program for the year
2000 has been filed and a final determination of the amount to be received by
the Company will be made by December 2000.
12. COMMON AND PREFERRED STOCK
COMMON STOCK
Pursuant to its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is prohibited
from paying any dividends on the Common Stock until all accumulated dividends in
respect of the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock have been
paid.
On December 16, 1997, the Company completed its initial public offering of
4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $7.00 per share (the
"Offering"). The net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated expenses payable by the Company were
approximately $25,050,000. Additionally, in connection with the underwriting
services provided in the Offering, the underwriters received warrants with a
five year term to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $8.40. All warrants remained unexercised at June 30, 2000.
On December 31, 1997, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock at $7.00
per share to the underwriters of the Offering pursuant to the exercise of an
over-allotment option granted in connection with the Offering. The net proceeds
from the exercise of this option, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated expenses payable by the Company were approximately
$3,900,000.
On July 1, 1999, the Company implemented a Company match under its 401(k)
retirement plan (the "Plan") whereby the Company will match employee
contributions with Company stock at the rate of 50% of the amount an employee
contributes, up to 5% of salary. The contribution of stock is made on a monthly
basis and matching contributions will vest over three years. The Company
recorded an expense of $68,782 for the year ended June 30, 2000 and contributed
10,992 shares of common stock to participants. At June 30, 2000, 9,353 of the
contributed shares were fully vested.
In October 1999, the Company completed a private equity offering of 1,592,727
shares of common stock at a price of $5.50 per share. The net proceeds from the
offering, after deducting underwriting commissions and expenses paid by the
Company, were approximately $8,229,000. In connection with the underwriting
services provided, the underwriters received warrants with a 7 year term to
purchase 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.05 per share.
(See Note 16 - Related Party Transactions)
In each of July and October 1999 and January and April 2000, the Company issued
14,286 shares of common stock (57,144 in total) as payment for royalties due
under a research agreement between the Company and a third party (see Note 14).
The Company recorded royalty expense of $332,022, the fair market value of the
shares on their dates of issuance, during the year ended June 30, 2000.
PREFERRED STOCK
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of the preferred stock
in one or more series. The Company's Board of Directors is authorized to fix the
relative rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof, including
dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, terms of redemption,
redemption prices, liquidation preferences, the number of shares constituting
any series
F-13
<PAGE> 50
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
and the designation of such series. The issuance of preferred stock with voting
and conversion rights may adversely affect the voting power of the holders of
the Company's Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Common
Stock, including the loss of voting control. Other than the shares of Series A
Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, there are no shares of preferred
stock currently issued and outstanding.
Series A Preferred Stock
The Company has issued a total of 67,600 shares of Series A Redeemable Preferred
Stock with a par value of $4.50 per share and a six percent per annum dividend
rate. Dividends shall be paid either in cash or common stock of the Company. The
Company has the right at any time after the date of original issuance of the
Series A Preferred Stock to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock in whole or in
part at a price of $4.50 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. The
Company is required to redeem this preferred stock in cash at par plus all
accrued but unpaid dividends from thirty percent of the amount by which the
Company's annual net income after taxes exceeds $5,000,000.
Dividends on the shares of Series A Preferred Stock are cumulative and must be
paid in the event of liquidation and before any distribution to holders of
common stock. Cumulative dividends in arrears at June 30, 2000 and 1999 totaled
$135,750 (or $2.01 per share) and $117,500 (or $1.74 per share), respectively.
The Series A Preferred Stock has no liquidation preference, no conversion rights
and no registration rights.
Series B Preferred Stock
The Company has issued a total of 86,041 shares of Series B Redeemable Preferred
Stock with a par value of $5.00 per share and a six percent per annum dividend
rate. Dividends shall be paid either in cash or common stock of the Company. The
Company has the right at any time after the date of original issuance of the
Series B Preferred Stock, but subject to the prior redemption of all of the
Series A Preferred Stock, to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock in whole or in
part at a price of $5.00 per share plus all accrued but unpaid dividends. The
Company is required, subject to the prior redemption of all of the Series A
Preferred Stock, to redeem this preferred stock in cash at par plus all accrued
but unpaid dividends from twenty percent of the amount by which the Company's
annual net income after taxes in any year exceeds $5,000,000.
Dividends on the shares of Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative and must be
paid in the event of liquidation and before any distribution to holders of
common stock. No dividends may be paid with respect to this stock until all
cumulative dividends in respect of Series A Preferred Stock have been paid.
Cumulative dividends in arrears at June 30, 2000 and 1999, totaled $165,612 (or
$1.92 per share) and $139,750 (or $1.62 per share), respectively.
The Series B Preferred Stock has no liquidation preference, no conversion rights
and no registration rights.
Changes in the preferred stock accounts were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Series A Series B
No. of No. of
Shares Amount Shares Amount Total
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at June 30, 1997 67,600 $385,200 86,041 $518,355 $ 903,555
Accretion of preferred stock dividends 18,250 25,800 44,050
</TABLE>
F-14
<PAGE> 51
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
------ -------- ------ -------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 1998 67,600 403,450 86,041 544,155 947,605
Accretion of preferred stock dividends 18,250 25,800 44,050
------ -------- ------ -------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 1999 67,600 421,700 86,041 569,955 991,655
Accretion of preferred stock dividends 18,250 25,862 44,112
------ -------- ------ -------- ----------
Balance at June 30, 2000 67,600 $439,950 86,041 $595,817 $1,035,767
====== ======== ====== ======== ==========
</TABLE>
On July 13, 2000, the Company offered all shareholders of the Series A Preferred
stock and Series B Preferred stock the opportunity to exchange their shares of
preferred stock for shares of the Company's Common Stock. Under the terms of the
exchange, the preferred shares were exchanged for a number of Common shares
equal to the par value of the preferred plus accrued but unpaid dividends,
divided by the average of the closing sales price of the Common Stock as quoted
on the NASDAQ National Market for the ten (10) business days immediately
preceding the closing date of the transaction. The transaction closed on August
17, 2000. Of the 67,600 shares of Series A preferred which were outstanding at
the date of the offer, 56,237 shares were exchanged for 70,256 shares of Common
Stock. Of the 86,041 shares of Series B preferred which were outstanding at the
date of the offer, 73,207 shares were exchanged for 97,313 shares of Common
Stock.
13. WARRANTS AND OPTIONS:
WARRANTS
The Company had outstanding a total of 1,307,130, 1,192,130 and 1,202,130
warrants to purchase common stock at June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The exercise prices range from $8.00 to $20.00 per share and the expiration of
such warrants range from 2003 to 2007. The following is a description of warrant
activity for the fiscal years ended June 30, 1998, 1999 and 2000:
In November 1991, warrants with a five year term to purchase 80,800 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share were granted to an employee
of the Company. These warrants vested as follows: (i) 20,000 in November 1991,
(ii) 13,600 each in November 1992, November 1993 and November 1994 and (iii)
20,000 in September 1993. Each series of warrants expires five years after the
applicable vesting date. 20,000 and 13,600 of these warrants expired in November
1996 and 1997, respectively. In May 1998 the Board of Directors approved the
issuance of five year, contingent warrants to purchase up to 47,200 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $8.00 per share, to the extent the warrants
issued in November 1991 expire unexercised. As of June 30, 2000, 47,200 such
warrants had been issued at $8.00 and were unexercised. None of the original
warrants remained outstanding.
In connection with a July 1994 issuance of common stock to Blockbuster
Entertainment Corporation ("Blockbuster"), the Company issued warrants with a
five year term to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$15.00 per share. The warrants expired unexercised in July 1999. Additionally,
the Company granted warrants to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $20.00 per share. These warrants vest upon the future
occurrence of any of the following events: (i) Blockbuster provides consulting
services to the Company which materially enhance the Company's technology
relating to real time insertion; (ii) Blockbuster and the Company enter into a
joint venture for the purpose of exploiting the Company's system in the
entertainment industry for non-television applications; or (iii) the Miami
Dolphins are the first National Football League team to support the use of the
Company's system in connection with broadcast of its games. These warrants
expire three years after the vesting date. As of June 30, 2000 none of the
vesting criteria had been met.
In October 1997, the Company issued warrants with a five year term to purchase
300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share in
connection with a Bridge Financing (see Note 11). As of June 30, 2000, all of
these warrants had been exercised.
F-15
<PAGE> 52
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
On May 28, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a modification
of the terms of certain outstanding warrants. The modification, which affected
approximately 548,358 warrants, reduced the exercise price of such warrants to
$8.00 per share and extended the exercise period for an additional five years.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
The Company adopted a Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") in July 1993 for employees,
officers, directors, consultants and independent contractors of the Company. The
Plan initially reserved 360,000 shares of common stock for issuance upon the
exercise of stock options. The Plan was amended in 1995, 1996, 1997 and 1998 to
reserve additional shares. On April 5, 2000, the Board of Directors authorized
an amendment to the Company's Amended 1993 Stock Option Plan to increase the
authorized number of shares which may be issued pursuant to options granted
under the Plan from 2,160,000 to 3,660,000 shares, subject to shareholder
approval and ratification within one year. As of June 30, 2000, 3,660,000 shares
were reserved for the Plan, including the 1,500,000 shares subject to
shareholder approval and ratification.
The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, which determines the
distribution of all options. The Plan provides for the granting of options
intended to qualify as incentive stock options ("ISOs") as defined in Section
422A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and non-qualified stock
options ("NQSOs") to key employees of the Company as well as NQSOs to
non-employee directors, independent contractors and consultants who perform
services for the Company. The exercise price of all ISOs granted under the Plan
may not be less than the fair market value of the shares at the time the option
is granted. Options may be for a period of not more than ten years from the date
of grant and generally vest ratably over a three year period. Options are not
assignable or otherwise transferable except by will or the laws of descent and
distribution.
Information with respect to options under the Plan is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WTD AVG
NUMBER OF EXERCISE
OPTIONS OPTION PRICE PRICE PER
OUTSTANDING RANGE SHARE
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at June 30, 1997 1,100,924 $10.00-$20.00 $16.38
Authorized
Granted 356,290
Exercised
Forfeitures (139,707)
---------
Balance at June 30, 1998 1,317,507 $2.50-$17.50 $8.35
Authorized
Granted 413,873
Exercised
(1,541)
Forfeitures (156,654)
---------
Balance at June 30, 1999 1,573,185 $2.50-$17.50 $5.77
Authorized
Granted
942,981
Exercised
(14,618)
Forfeitures
(86,191)
---------
Balance at June 30, 2000 2,415,357 $2.50-$15.00 $5.57
=========
Exercisable at June 30, 2000 1,606,513
</TABLE>
F-16
<PAGE> 53
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Exercisable at June 30, 1999 1,038,428
Exercisable at June 30, 1998 850,938
</TABLE>
The options outstanding at June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, by price range,
are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $2.50-$7.50 1,768,490
$7.51-$12.50 626,867
$12.51-$15.00 20,000
----------
Total 2,415,357
==========
1999 $2.50-$7.50 623,391
$7.51-$12.50 911,626
$12.51-$17.50 38,168
----------
Total 1,573,185
==========
1998 $2.50-$7.50 262,293
$7.51-$12.50 994,492
$12.51-$17.50 60,722
----------
Total 1,317,507
==========
</TABLE>
The weighted average remaining contractual lives of outstanding options at June
30, 2000 was 6.7 years.
The Company applies the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, no compensation
has been recognized in the financial statements with respect to options and
warrants issued with an exercise price at or above the fair market value of the
stock on the grant date. Had compensation costs for such options and warrants
been determined based on the fair value approach promulgated by Statement of
Financial Standards No. 123 "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", the
Company's net loss applicable to Common Stock would have been increased to
$(15,344,604) ($(1.64) per share), $(10,121,514) ($(1.24) per share) and
$(14,098,692) ($(2.39) per share) for the years ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and
June 30, 1998, respectively.
The pro forma compensation expense of $2,855,846, $423,466 and $4,970,318 for
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, was calculated on the fair value of each
option using the minimum value method for those options issued prior to October
17, 1997 (the date of initial filing with the SEC) and using the Black Scholes
method for those options issued on October 17, 1997 and later. The following
weighted average assumptions were used in the calculations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk free interest rate 6.28% 5.87% 6.10%
Expected option lives 6.33 years 8.6 years 6.1 years
Expected volatility 70.0% 62.0% 62.0%
</TABLE>
On October 1, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a
modification of the terms of all stock options held by individuals who, as of
that date, were current employees of the Company, except executive officers. The
modification, which affected approximately 320,380 options, reduced the exercise
price of such options to $8.00 per share. No compensation expense was recorded
in
F-17
<PAGE> 54
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
connection with this transaction as the exercise price of such options exceeded
the fair market value of the Company's stock on the date of this transaction.
In January 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the creation of
an employee bonus pool of 100,000 incentive stock options, pursuant to the
Company's Stock Option Plan to be awarded during calendar year 1998, on a
discretionary basis, in recognition of extraordinary performance. In December
1998, 82,000 incentive stock options from this pool were awarded to certain
employees of the Company at an exercise price of $3.875, the fair market value
of the underlying stock as of the date of issuance.
In January 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the grant of
options with a ten year term to purchase up to 59,600 shares of common stock to
a third party consultant. Of those options granted, 9,600 were fully vested upon
grant in consideration for consulting services previously rendered. Accordingly,
the Company recorded a charge of $33,312 in the third quarter of 1998 which
represents the fair value of the vested options. The remaining 50,000 options
will vest upon the earlier of (i) the consultant providing ten years of
continued consulting services, or (ii) the attainment of certain performance
criteria. Charges for such unvested options will be recorded in proportion to
progress made on such performance criteria. There was no charge recorded in
fiscal year 1998, 1999 or 2000 for the unvested portion of this option grant.
In January 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the grant of
incentive stock options with a ten year term to purchase up to 100,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $7.25 to the Company's Treasurer and CFO.
No compensation expense was recorded in connection with this transaction as the
exercise price of such options was equal to the fair market value of the
Company's stock on the date of the transaction.
On May 28, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a modification
of the terms of certain stock options held by individuals who, as of that date,
were current officers or directors of the Company. The modification, which
affected approximately 350,000 options, reduced the exercise price of such
options to $8.00 per share. No compensation expense was recorded in connection
with this transaction as the exercise price of such options exceeded the fair
market value of the Company's stock on the date of the transaction.
In November 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the granting of
two stock options to the Company's President and CEO. The first such option is
for 200,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $4.563 and vests over
a three-year period. No compensation expense was recorded in connection with
this transaction as the exercise price of such option was not less than the fair
market value of the Company's stock on the date of this transaction. The second
option is for the purchase of an additional 200,000 shares of Common Stock at an
exercise price equal to $7.00 per share with vesting dependent upon the
attainment of certain performance criteria based on the revenues from operations
during the fiscal years ending June 30, 1999 through June 30, 2002. Both option
grants are for a term of 10 years. In April 2000, the Board of Directors
approved a modification of this grant to waive the performance criteria for
100,000 of these options as a precondition for vesting, in recognition of
commendable performance. Therefore, 50,000 options vested on April 5, 2000 and
50,000 options vested on June 30, 2000. No compensation expense was recorded in
connection with this transaction as the exercise price of such options exceeded
the fair market value of the Company's stock on the date of the transaction.
In December 1998, the Shareholders of the Company ratified an amendment to the
Stock Option Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance upon the exercise of options granted under the Plan from 1,560,000 to
2,160,000.
In December 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the issuance of
five year, fully
F-18
<PAGE> 55
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
vested options to a third party consultant based on the number of days of
service to the Company. Between October 1998 and July 1999 the Company granted
options to purchase 8,157 shares of common stock with exercise prices ranging
from $2.40 to $5.57. The Company recorded compensation expense of $29,528 and
$1,139 in the fiscal years ended June 30, 1999 and 2000, respectively, with
respect to the issuance of these options.
In June 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the creation of an
employee bonus pool of 100,000 incentive stock options, pursuant to the
Company's Stock Option Plan to be awarded during calendar year 1999, on a
discretionary basis, to individuals who are employees of the Company at the time
of grant (other than officers), either as an incentive or in recognition of
extraordinary performance. As of December 31, 1999, 97,500 of these options had
been issued.
On September 30, 1999, the Board of Directors of the Company awarded stock
options to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock to each of its current
members. The exercise price of these options was $4.688, the fair market value
on the date of grant. The options have a term of ten years and were fully vested
upon grant.
In September 1999, the Board of Directors approved, and on December 3, 1999 the
shareholders approved and ratified, an amendment to the Stock Option Plan to
authorize automatic annual stock option grants to the members of the Board of
Directors. The options vest, with respect to each director, based on their
attendance at board meetings. Under this amendment, members of the Board of
Directors received a total of 80,000 options, 67,500 of which vested during the
year ended June 30, 2000. In connection with the vesting of these options, the
Company recorded compensation expense of $129,040 calculated as the excess of
the fair market value of the stock over the exercise price at the time of
vesting.
In October 1999, the Board of Directors approved the grant of incentive stock
options with a ten year term to purchase up to 65,000 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of $4.688, the fair market value of the common stock on the
date of grant, to the Company's Vice President of Marketing and Sales.
In November 1999, the Board of Directors approved the grant of options with a
five year term to purchase up to 27,500 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $6.38 to a third party consultant for marketing services provided to
the Company. A compensation charge of $130,075 was recorded in connection with
this issuance.
In December 1999, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved
the Company's prior contingent grant on June 12, 1998 to purchase 60,000 shares
of common stock by a third party consultant. The exercise price of these options
is $4.25, the fair value of the stock on the date of grant, and the options have
a term of five years. A compensation charge of $189,414 was recorded in
connection with this issuance.
In April 2000 the Board of Directors approved the grant of options with a ten
year term to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $5.938 to both the Company's Chairman and the President and CEO. The options
will vest upon the attainment of performance goals to be established by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or in any event, upon the
continued employment of the officers at the end of four (4) years. No options
were earned under the performance criteria in the fiscal year ended June 30,
2000.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
GE AGREEMENT
In July 1991, the Company entered into a license agreement with General Electric
Company ("GE") granting to the Company a non-exclusive license for use of
certain of GE's intellectual property. This
F-19
<PAGE> 56
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
agreement expired in July 1996 and in November 1997 the Company negotiated a new
agreement with GE. This agreement, which is retroactive to July 1996, has a
five-year term.
Under the terms of the license agreement, the Company is required to pay
royalties to GE based upon the Company's gross revenues. All royalties accrue as
earned and are payable semi-annually. As of June 30, 2000 and 1999, the amounts
accrued under this agreement were $41,285 and $21,385, respectively.
SARNOFF AGREEMENT
The Company entered into an agreement with David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc.
("Sarnoff") in November 1990, which was amended in August 1991 and June 1995,
granting the Company an exclusive, worldwide license for use of the proprietary
Pyramid Image Processing technology developed by Sarnoff in the fields of
television advertising and for any purpose for television programming involving
sports. The Company may terminate this agreement at any time.
Under terms of this agreement, the Company pays royalties of between 3% and 5%
to Sarnoff, based upon the Company's gross revenues. All royalties shall accrue
as earned, but no cash payments were required to be made until the earlier of
the date on which cumulative gross revenues reached twenty million dollars or
January 1, 1999. Payments for all accrued royalties through December 31, 1999
became due in January 1999 and were paid in full by December 1999.
Additionally, under terms of this agreement, commencing in January 1999,
minimum quarterly royalties of $100,000 became due in order to maintain the
license. For the calendar years 1999 and 2000, the Company has the option of
paying these minimum royalties in cash or with Company stock at its last issue
price. The Company elected to issue stock for royalties due for all payments due
in 1999 and for both the first and second quarter 2000. Accordingly, the Company
recorded total royalty expense in the amount of $332,164 and $152,232 for the
years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively. These charges reflected the
issuance of 57,144 and 28,572 shares of common stock during the years ended June
30, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
THESEUS AGREEMENT
In December 1995, the Company entered into a license agreement with Theseus
Research, Inc. ("Theseus") whereby the Company was granted a non-exclusive
worldwide license, without the right of sublicense, to use Theseus technology in
its system. A prepayment was made at the time the agreement was executed and
royalties earned are offset against this prepayment. At June 30, 2000 and 1999,
the prepaid balance was $37,915 and $43,721, respectively. During the term of
the license, the Company will pay royalties of between .05% and .20% of net
sales on a quarterly basis. The agreement terminates with the expiration of the
last of the patents included in the licensed technology.
HQ GLOBAL WORKPLACES
In February 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with HQ Global
Workplaces to lease temporary office space for a term of six months beginning in
May 2000. Under the terms of the agreement the Company pays a monthly fee and
was required to deposit with HQ Global a security deposit in the amount of
$19,194.
LEASES
The Company leases its primary office space under operating leases. In July
1997, the Company entered into a three-year operating lease for office space in
New York City. This lease expired in May 2000 and was not renewed because of
unfavorable renewal terms. The Company, instead, moved into temporary office
space leased from HQ Global Workplaces and began a search for available
long-term office space. In October 1997, the Company entered into a five-year
operating lease agreement for its office headquarters in Lawrenceville, New
Jersey. In July 1999, the Company entered into an operating lease agreement for
additional office space in Lawrenceville, New Jersey. This lease is co-
F-20
<PAGE> 57
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
terminus with the October 1997 operating lease for its headquarters and both
will terminate in September 2002. Rent and equipment lease expense for the years
ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $ 472,947, $400,956 and $395,979,
respectively.
Future minimum rent and lease payments are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Amount
---- ------
<S> <C>
2001 265,781
2002 265,781
2003 44,296
Thereafter --
---------
Total minimum lease payments $ 575,858
=========
</TABLE>
Under the terms of the five year lease signed in October 1997 for the
Lawrenceville, New Jersey headquarters, the Company is required to maintain an
irrevocable, unconditional $51,258 letter of credit throughout the term of the
lease.
In November 1999, the Company entered into a five year capital lease for the
purchase of a mobile production truck.
Future minimum lease payments under this capital lease are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
2001 $ 18,644
2002 18,644
2003 18,644
2004 18,644
Thereafter 6,214
------------
80,790
Less: Amount representing interest (16,996)
------------
Present value of minimum least payments $ 63,794
============
</TABLE>
LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
In June 1999 the Company filed suit for patent infringement in U.S. District
Court in Delaware against Scidel USA Ltd., the U.S. subsidiary of the Israeli
Company, Scidel Technologies Ltd. The Company contends that Scidel's video
imaging system for electronically inserting advertising into live television
broadcasts infringes on PVI's U.S. Patents No. 5,264,933 and 5,892,554. PVI
seeks a permanent injunction prohibiting infringement of its patents. Although
it is not possible to determine the ultimate outcome of this matter, it is
management's opinion that the resolution of this issue will not have a material
adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of
the Company.
In October 1999, the Company filed a request with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office ("USPTO") to correct the ownership of US Patent 5,917,553,
licensed to Sportvision, Inc. The Company believes that the basic subject matter
of this patent belongs to PVI. After the Company filed this action, Sportvision,
Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company for infringement of the disputed '533
patent. Sportvision, Inc. is seeking injunctive relief and compensation
including damages. Based upon our preliminary assessment of the claim, we
believe that we are the owner of the basic subject matter of the disputed patent
and that the claim lacks merit. We plan to vigorously defend our ownership of
the patent. Patent litigation involves complex legal and factual issues. The
outcome of such actions are highly uncertain. In addition, patent litigation
involves considerable costs. We cannot assure you that we do not or will not
infringe the patent or intellectual property rights of another company. If we
lose a patent infringement action, we may be required to pay a significant
amount of
F-21
<PAGE> 58
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
money or to stop selling our products. We may also need to license disputed
technology from another company, if possible. If our patents are successfully
challenged, our business, financial condition and the results of our operations
will be adversely affected.
15. INDUSTRY SEGMENT, GEOGRAPHIC AND CUSTOMER INFORMATION
The Company operates in one industry segment, real-time video imaging and
markets its L-VIS System worldwide through licensing agreements. One
licensee, Publicidad Virtual S.A. de C.V. accounted for 36%, 37% and 53% of
net sales for fiscal years ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Geographic information is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
U.S. LatinAmerica Other Total
---- ------------ ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1998
Advertising and production revenue $ 324,789 $ -- $ -- $ 324,789
License and royalty fees
-- 371,223 -- 371,223
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total $ 324,789 $ 371,223 $ -- $ 696,012
========== ========== ========== ==========
1999
Advertising and production revenue $ 694,528 $ -- $ -- $ 694,528
License and royalty fees
-- 450,185 77,500 527,685
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total $ 694,528 $ 450,185 $ 77,500 $1,222,213
========== ========== ========== ==========
2000
Advertising and production revenue $1,483,664 $ -- $ 25,000 $1,508,664
License and royalty fees
-- 1,090,484 446,751 1,537,235
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total $1,483,664 $1,090,484 $ 471,751 $3,045,899
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
All Company assets are based in the United States with the exception of
certain L-VIS Systems which are being used by the Company's licensees in
connection with foreign operations. The approximate value of these L-VIS
Systems located in foreign countries is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
L-VIS Systems U.S. LatinAmerica Canada Belgium Total
------------- ---- ------------ ------ ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1998 1,361,906 343,244 -- -- 1,705,150
1999 1,285,870 620,634 135,000 -- 2,041,504
2000 2,004,045 426,821 135,000 691,472 3,257,338
</TABLE>
16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
A member of the Board of Directors of the Company is also the President of
J.J. Pomerance & Co., Inc., a corporation that furnished consulting services
to the Company from time to time through the initial public offering in
December 1997.
A member of the Board of Directors of the Company is also a principal
shareholder and the President of the Board of Directors of Presencia, which has
made several equity investments in the Company and is the Company's former joint
venture partner and current licensee. (See Note 16 - Industry Segment,
Geographic and Customer Information)
A member of the Board of Directors of the Company is formerly the sole
shareholder and President of Princeton Venture Research, Inc., a company that
has furnished consulting services to the company from time to time. The member
of the Board of Directors of the Company is also the President of PVR
Securities. On June 28, 2000, the Company entered into a three month agreement
with PVR
F-22
<PAGE> 59
PRINCETON VIDEO IMAGE. INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Securities whereby PVR Securities would act as non-exclusive financial
advisor and assist the Company in raising additional capital. As compensation,
PVI agrees to pay PVR Securities a cash fee equal to 5% of gross proceeds of any
private sale of equity securities of PVI if the buyer is introduced by PVR
Securities. In addition, PVR Securities will receive warrants to purchase twelve
and one-half percent of the amount of the securities sold to any purchasers
introduced to PVI by PVR Securities at an exercise price equal to 110% of the
closing price of the equity securities sold. The agreement can be extended by
mutual consent.
A member of the Board of Directors of the Company is also a Managing Director
and Executive Vice President of Allen & Company Incorporated, which is a
principal shareholder of the Company and furnishes financial advisory services
to the Company from time to time. Allen, as a Representative, received
underwriting discounts and commissions, as well as Representatives' Warrants
initially exercisable for 380,000 shares of Common Stock, with respect to
services rendered on behalf of the Company with respect to the initial public
offering of its Common Stock in December 1997. Additionally, Allen & Company
received commissions in the aggregate amount of approximately $438,000, as well
as warrants initially exercisable for 200,000 shares of common stock for its
services rendered on behalf of the company in connection with the private equity
offering completed in October 1999. In June 2000, the Company entered into an
agreement with Allen & Co. whereby Allen & Co. would act as the Company's
exclusive financial advisor for certain transactions. No transaction has been
completed with respect to this agreement.
In July 1997, two employees of the Company signed notes (the "Employee Notes")
for $655,000 as consideration for the exercise of warrants to purchase 262,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Accordingly, a
$360,250 charge to general and administrative expense was recorded in July 1997
for the excess of the fair value of the Company's stock in July 1997 over the
exercise price of the underlying warrants. In December 1997, these two employees
signed notes (the "Tax Notes") for $169,498 as consideration for funds received
for the express purpose of paying the tax liabilities incurred by each of them
in connection with the exercise of their warrants. The Employees concurrently
signed Pledge Agreements pursuant to which the 262,000 shares of common stock
purchased were pledged to the Company. Both the Employee Notes and the Tax Notes
bear interest at a rate of 8.5% and contain no recourse provisions by which the
Company can enforce collection. The Employee Notes mature in July 2002 and the
Tax Notes become due and payable upon the earlier of (i) the first anniversary
of the date on which all of the Pledged Shares become freely transferable, and
(ii) the date on which the employee sells, assigns or otherwise disposes of, for
consideration, any interest in any share of capital stock of Company stock.
In April 1999 and May 1999, Publicidad Virtual signed promissory notes to the
Company for $114,300 and $260,075, respectively as consideration for the
equipment charge associated with two L-VIS Systems delivered to Publicidad for
use in operations. The April 1999 note for $114,300 was paid in full in March
2000. Both notes were issued with an interest rate of 15% and had a term of one
(1) year and three (3) years, respectively.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK:
The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with major financial
institutions. Held to maturity securities consist of U.S. government Treasury
securities.
17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
In July 2000, the Company entered into a five year, non-binding letter of intent
with Cybersmart, a Korean software and marketing company. Under the terms of the
agreement, Cybersmart will have exclusive rights to market the L-VIS System for
television broadcasts which originate and are intended for telecast solely
within Korea. The Company will receive license fees and a share of the revenue
received by Cybersmart based on the use of the L-VIS System.
F-23
