<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999.
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-13038
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS 75-2531304
- --------------------------------------------- ----------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer
or organization) Identification Number)
777 Main Street, Suite 2100, Fort Worth, Texas 76102
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (817) 321-2100
--------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding twelve (12) months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past ninety (90) days.
YES X NO
------- -----------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
As of March 24, 2000, the aggregate market value of the 59,115,118 units of
limited partnership interest and 8,000,000 preferred units of the registrant
held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $2.2 billion, based
upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange of $35 7/8 for units and
$14 for preferred units of beneficial interest of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Company.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for Crescent Real Estate Company's 2000 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held in June 2000 are incorporated by reference into Part
III.
<PAGE> 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
PART I.
<S> <C> <C>
Item 1. Business.............................................................................. 2
Item 2. Properties............................................................................ 16
Item 3. Legal Proceedings..................................................................... 27
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................................... 27
PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Unitholder Matters.................. 28
Item 6. Selected Financial Data............................................................... 29
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations......................................................................... 30
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk............................ 58
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........................................... 60
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.................................................................. 100
PART III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the General Partner of the Registrant............. 100
Item 11. Executive Compensation................................................................ 101
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management........................ 101
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions........................................ 101
PART IV.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K...................... 101
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE> 3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership ("CREELP" and, together with its direct and indirect ownership
interests in limited partnerships, corporations and limited liability companies,
the "Operating Partnership"), was formed under the terms of a limited
partnership agreement dated February 9, 1994. The Operating Partnership is
controlled by Crescent Real Estate Equities Company, a Texas real estate
investment trust (the "Company"), through the Company's ownership of all of the
outstanding stock of Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd., a Delaware corporation
("CREE, Ltd."), which owns an approximately 1% general partner interest in the
Operating Partnership. In addition, the Company owns an approximately 89%
limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership, with the remaining
approximately 10% limited partner interest held by other limited partners. The
Operating Partnership directly or indirectly owns substantially all of the
economic interests in seven separate single purpose limited partnerships (all
formed for the purpose of obtaining securitized debt), with the remaining
interests owned indirectly by the Company through seven separate corporations,
each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of CREE, Ltd. and a general partner
of one of the seven limited partnerships.
All of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership other than the
Company own, in addition to limited partner interests, units. Each unit entitles
the holder to exchange the unit (and the related limited partner interest) for
two common shares of the Company or, at the Company's option, an equivalent
amount of cash. For purposes of this report, the term "unit" or "unit of
partnership interest" refers to the limited partner interest and, if applicable,
related units held by a limited partner. Accordingly, the Company's
approximately 89% limited partner interest has been treated as equivalent, for
purposes of this report, to 60,160,990 units, and the remaining approximately
10% limited partner interest has been treated as equivalent, for purposes of
this report, to 6,975,952 units. In addition, the Company's 1% general partner
interest has been treated as equivalent, for purposes of this report, to 607,687
units.
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's assets and
operations were composed of five major investment segments:
o Office and Retail Segment;
o Hospitality Segment;
o Residential Development Segment;
o Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment; and
o Behavioral Healthcare Segment.
2
<PAGE> 4
Within these segments, the Operating Partnership owned directly or
indirectly the following real estate assets (the "Properties") as of December
31, 1999:
o OFFICE AND RETAIL SEGMENT consisted of 89 office properties
(collectively referred to as the "Office Properties") located in 31
metropolitan submarkets in nine states, with an aggregate of
approximately 31.8 million net rentable square feet, and seven
retail properties (collectively referred to as the "Retail
Properties") with an aggregate of approximately 0.8 million net
rentable square feet. See "Industry Segments - Office and Retail
Segment - Recent Developments - Property Dispositions" for a
description of the disposition of six of the Office Properties and
four of the Retail Properties subsequent to December 31, 1999.
o HOSPITALITY SEGMENT consisted of five upscale business class hotels
with a total of 2,168 rooms, three luxury resorts and spas with a
total of 516 rooms and two Canyon Ranch destination fitness resorts
and spas that can accommodate up to 462 guests daily (collectively
referred to as the "Hotel Properties"). All Hotel Properties,
except the Omni Austin Hotel, are leased to subsidiaries of
Crescent Operating, Inc. ("COI"). The Omni Austin Hotel is leased
to HCD Austin Corporation.
o RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SEGMENT consisted of the Operating
Partnership's ownership of real estate mortgages and non-voting
common stock representing interests ranging from 40% to 95% in five
unconsolidated residential development corporations (collectively
referred to as the "Residential Development Corporations"), which
in turn, through joint venture or partnership arrangements,
currently own 14 residential development properties (collectively
referred to as the "Residential Development Properties").
o TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS SEGMENT (FORMERLY THE REFRIGERATED
STORAGE SEGMENT) consisted of the Operating Partnership's indirect
39.6% interest in three partnerships (collectively referred to as
the "Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships"), each of which
owns one or more corporations or limited liability companies
(collectively referred to as the "Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Corporations") which, as of December 31, 1999, directly or
indirectly owned 89 temperature-controlled logistics properties
(collectively referred to as the "Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Properties") with an aggregate of approximately 428.3 million cubic
feet (17.0 million square feet). This segment was restructured in
1999, and the new ownership structure was effective as of March 12,
1999.
o BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE SEGMENT consisted of 88 properties in 24
states (collectively referred to as the "Behavioral Healthcare
Properties") that were leased to Charter Behavioral Health Systems,
LLC ("CBHS") and its subsidiaries. CBHS was formed to operate the
behavioral healthcare business located at the Behavioral Healthcare
Properties and is owned 10% by a subsidiary of Magellan Health
Services, Inc. ("Magellan") and 90% by COI and an affiliate of COI.
On February 16, 2000, CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are
subject to the master lease with the Operating Partnership filed
voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Of the 88 Behavioral
Healthcare Properties, 37 are designated as the "Core Properties"
for the conduct of CBHS's business and remain subject to the master
lease. Since December 31, 1999, CBHS has ceased or is planning to
cease operations at the remaining 51 Behavioral Healthcare
Properties which are designated as the "Non-Core Properties," and
the Operating Partnership is actively marketing these Properties
for sale. From January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating
Partnership sold 11 of these Behavioral Healthcare Properties and
entered into contracts or letters of intent to sell an additional
six of these Behavioral Healthcare Properties. The Operating
Partnership intends to sell the remaining 37 Core Behavioral
Healthcare Properties or lease them to new tenants. See "Industry
Segments - Behavioral Healthcare Segment" for a description of the
current status of CBHS and the Operating Partnership's investment
in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
3
<PAGE> 5
See Note 4. Segment Reporting of Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data for a table showing revenues and funds from operations for
the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and identifiable assets for
each of these investment segments at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
BUSINESS OBJECTIVES AND OPERATING STRATEGIES
The Operating Partnership's business objective is to provide its
unitholders with attractive but predictable growth in cash flow and underlying
asset value. In addition, the Operating Partnership seeks to create value by
distinguishing itself as the leader in each of its investment segments through
customer service and asset quality.
STRATEGIC PLAN
In August 1999, the Operating Partnership announced a strategic plan
for the years 2000 - 2002. Under the plan, the Operating Partnership is focused,
during this period on increasing:
o net asset value per share;
o funds from operations and cash available for distribution per
share; and
o corresponding growth rates in net asset value per share, funds from
operations and cash available for distribution per share.
The strategic plan also includes short-term goals designed to meet
these objectives. These short-term goals are to:
o resolve the issues surrounding the Behavioral Healthcare Segment;
o refinance 2000 and 2001 debt maturities and reduce exposure to
variable-rate debt;
o dispose of non-strategic or non-core assets within the investment
segments;
o market certain of the Office Properties for joint ventures; and
o engage the Company in a share repurchase program.
OPERATING AND FINANCING STRATEGIES
Based on management's assessment of current conditions in the real
estate and financial markets, the Operating Partnership will focus in 2000 on
growth in revenues from its existing Property portfolio. The Operating
Partnership seeks to enhance its operating performance and financial position
by:
o continuing to operate the Office Properties as long-term
investments, providing exceptional tenant services, improving
occupancies, increasing in-place rents to market rates and seeking
to increase revenues by providing tenants with a broad spectrum of
additional services;
o achieving a high tenant retention rate at the Office Properties
through quality service, individualized attention to its tenants
and active preventive maintenance programs;
o seeking to sell the non-core, non-strategic Office Properties;
o seeking to sell, in cooperation with CBHS, the Non-Core Behavioral
Healthcare Properties, and sell or lease the Core Behavioral
Healthcare Properties;
o seeking, over the next two years, to reduce the Operating
Partnership's investment in its upscale business class Hotel
Properties;
o optimizing the use of various sources of capital, including the
refinancing of existing debt and reducing exposure to variable-rate
debt;
4
<PAGE> 6
o entering into venture arrangements with private equity partners
under arrangements where the Operating Partnership would hold a
minority interest in the Properties and would continue to lease and
manage the Properties;
o repurchasing and retiring up to $500 million of the Company's
common shares over the next two years, which would decrease the
Company's limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership,
resulting in an increase in net income per unit and book value per
unit;
o entering into arrangements with other businesses, such as venture
capital and technology firms, to exchange office space, which is
difficult to lease due to location, size, or configuration, for an
equity interest in those businesses; and
o empowering management and employing compensation plans which are
designed to continue to attract and retain the best talent
available and are aligned with the interests of the Operating
Partnership's unitholders.
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
In 2000, the Operating Partnership intends to focus primarily on
assessing investment opportunities within each of its existing investment
segments that are consistent with its long-term investment strategy of acquiring
value investments at a significant discount to replacement cost in an
environment where the Operating Partnership believes values will appreciate to
or above replacement cost, and acquiring investments offering growth in cash
flow after applying management skills, renovation and expansion capital, and a
strategic vision.
The Operating Partnership's investment strategies include:
o capitalizing on the luxury resorts and spas business through (a)
the formation of an investment partnership headed by one of the
Operating Partnership's former executives, which will acquire new
resorts that can be converted into luxury spa destinations and
operated under the "Sonoma Spa Resorts" brand and (b) investments
in a management company which will operate and manage the property
or assets of some of the Operating Partnership's Hotel Properties
as well as any new resort properties acquired by the investment
partnership;
o expansion of the Canyon Ranch franchise and capitalizing on the
"Canyon Ranch" brand through the Operating Partnership's indirect
approximately 20% equity ownership (the Operating Partnership has
the opportunity to acquire an additional approximately 10% equity
ownership through July 2000) in a management company that has all
rights to develop and manage any new Canyon Ranch resorts or spa
concepts, both in the United States and internationally;
o seeking, within the Office Property segment, to provide tenants a
broad spectrum of services, such as telecommunication services, by
providing the vendors of those services with access to the tenants
of the Operating Partnership's Office Property portfolio in
exchange for potential royalty income and an equity investment;
o seeking private equity partners for joint ventures, in which the
Operating Partnership would invest for selected office property
development; and
o continuing to monetize current development through the Operating
Partnership's five Residential Development Corporations, and
reinvesting in other land developments as capital is returned.
5
<PAGE> 7
EMPLOYEES
As of March 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership had 634 employees. None
of these employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. The
Operating Partnership considers its employee relations to be good.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Operating Partnership and its Properties are subject to a variety
of federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws, including:
o Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended ("CERCLA");
o Resource Conservation & Recovery Act;
o Federal Clean Water Act;
o Federal Clean Air Act;
o Toxic Substances Control Act; and
o Occupational Safety & Health Act.
The application of these laws to a specific property that the Operating
Partnership owns will be dependent on a variety of property-specific
circumstances, including the former uses of the property and the building
materials used at each property. Under certain environmental laws, principally
CERCLA, a current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be required
to investigate and clean up certain hazardous or toxic substances,
asbestos-containing materials, or petroleum product releases at the property.
They may also be held liable to a governmental entity or third parties for
property damage and for investigation and clean up costs such parties incur in
connection with the contamination, whether or not the owner or operator knew of,
or was responsible for, the contamination. In addition, some environmental laws
create a lien on the contaminated site in favor of the government for damages
and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. The owner or operator
of a site also may be liable under common law to third parties for damages and
injuries resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the site.
Such costs or liabilities could exceed the value of the affected real estate.
The presence of contamination or the failure to remediate contamination may
adversely affect the owner's ability to sell or lease real estate or to borrow
using the real estate as collateral.
Compliance by the Operating Partnership with existing environmental,
health and safety laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Operating
Partnership's financial condition and results of operations, and management does
not believe it will have such an impact in the future. In addition, the
Operating Partnership has not incurred, and does not expect to incur any
material costs or liabilities due to environmental contamination at Properties
it currently owns or has owned in the past. However, the Operating Partnership
cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations on its current
Properties or on properties that it may acquire in the future. Except as set
forth below, the Operating Partnership has no current plans for substantial
capital expenditures with respect to compliance with environmental, health and
safety laws.
INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
OFFICE AND RETAIL SEGMENT
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership owned 89 Office
Properties located in 31 metropolitan submarkets in nine states, with an
aggregate of approximately 31.8 million net rentable square feet and seven
Retail Properties with an aggregate of approximately 0.8 million net rentable
square feet. The Operating
6
<PAGE> 8
Partnership, as lessor, has retained substantially all of the risks and benefits
of ownership of the Office and Retail Properties and accounts for its leases as
operating leases. Additionally, the Operating Partnership provides management
and leasing services for substantially all of its Office and Retail Properties.
From January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership sold six of the
Office Properties and four of the Retail Properties. See "Recent Developments -
Property Dispositions" below.
See Item 2. Properties for more information about the Operating
Partnership's Office and Retail Properties, and Note 1. Organization and Basis
of Presentation of Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for a
table that lists the principal subsidiaries of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Company ("Crescent Equities") and the Properties owned by such subsidiaries.
MARKET INFORMATION
The Office and Retail Properties reflect the Operating Partnership's
strategy of investing in premier assets within markets that have significant
potential for rental growth. In selecting the Office and Retail Properties, the
Operating Partnership analyzed demographic and economic data to focus on markets
expected to benefit from significant employment growth as well as corporate
relocations. After identifying and analyzing attractive regional markets, the
Operating Partnership selected submarkets that it believed would be the major
beneficiaries of this projected growth and that would integrate a premier office
environment with quality of life features such as: affordable residential
housing; an environment generally well-protected from crime; effective
transportation systems; a significant concentration of retailing alternatives;
and cultural centers, entertainment attractions and recreational facilities.
Other factors the Operating Partnership considered in selecting the submarkets
in which its Office and Retail Properties are located included proximity to
major airports and the relative aggressiveness of local governments in providing
tax and other incentives designed to favor business. Currently, the Operating
Partnership's Office and Retail Properties are located primarily in the
Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas. The southwestern
markets are expected to continue experiencing some of the strongest growth in
the country, being "demand-driven" markets because of high levels of
in-migration by corporations and labor. Companies continue to migrate to the
southwest with its friendly state and local governments, lower cost of living,
outstanding transportation systems, strong educational base, and central United
States location.
Within its selected submarkets, the Operating Partnership has focused
on premier locations that management believes are able to attract and retain the
highest quality tenants and command premium rents. In addition, several of the
Office and Retail Properties benefit from improvements made by prior owners or
developers beyond what currently could be justified by expected economic
returns. Examples of these improvements, which should not materially increase
the future operating cost of the Properties, are the inclusion of various
amenities, the use of expensive materials and the addition of extensive
landscaping. Such premier locations also tend to be more stable in downward
property cycles. Consistent with its long-term investment strategies, the
Operating Partnership has sought transactions where it was able to acquire
properties that have strong economic returns based on in-place tenancy and have
a dominant position within the submarket due to quality and/or location.
Accordingly, management's long-term investment strategy not only demands
acceptable current cash flow return on invested capital, but also considers
long-term cash flow growth prospects.
The Operating Partnership does not depend on a single or a few major
customers within the Office and Retail segment, the loss of which would have a
material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's financial condition or
results of operations. Based on rental revenues from office and retail leases in
effect as of December 31, 1999, no single tenant accounted for more than 4% of
the Operating Partnership's total Office and Retail segment rental revenues for
1999.
The demographic conditions, economic conditions and trends (population
growth and employment growth) favoring the markets in which the Operating
Partnership has invested are projected to continue to approximate or exceed the
national averages (with the exception of: New Orleans, Louisiana; Omaha,
Nebraska; and San Francisco, California), as illustrated in the following table.
Subsequent to December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership disposed of its
Office Property located in Omaha, Nebraska and one of its two Office
7
<PAGE> 9
Properties located in New Orleans, Louisiana and is actively marketing the
remaining property in New Orleans, Louisiana for sale. See "Recent Developments
- - Property Dispositions" below.
PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH FOR ALL COMPANY MARKETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Population Employment
Growth Growth
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) 1999-2009 1999-2009
- ------------------------------------------ ----------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Albuquerque, NM 13.9% 24.4%
Austin, TX 22.7 26.3
Colorado Springs, CO 12.7 21.9
Dallas, TX 15.5 20.7
Denver, CO 12.7 26.0
Fort Worth, TX 19.2 22.8
Houston, TX 15.5 21.9
Miami, FL 9.3 16.8
New Orleans, LA 1.4 10.1
Omaha, NE 6.8 10.7
Phoenix, AZ 26.8 36.4
San Diego, CA 17.4 19.7
San Francisco, CA 6.4 12.9
Washington, D.C 10.1 21.5
UNITED STATES 8.4 13.6
</TABLE>
- -----------------
Source: Compiled from information published by RFA/Dismal Sciences, Inc.
The Operating Partnership applies a well-defined leasing strategy in
order to capture the potential rental growth in the Operating Partnership's
portfolio of Office Properties as occupancy and rental rates increase with the
continued recovery of the markets and the submarkets in which the Operating
Partnership has invested. The Operating Partnership's strategy has been and
continues to be based in part on identifying and making its investments in
submarkets in which weighted average full-service rental rates (representing
base rent after giving effect to free rent and scheduled rent increases that
would be taken into account under generally accepted accounting principles
("GAAP") and including adjustments for expenses payable by or reimbursed from
tenants) are significantly less than weighted average full-service replacement
cost rental rates (the rate management estimates to be necessary to provide a
return to a developer of a comparable, multi-tenant building sufficient to
justify construction of new buildings) in that submarket. In calculating
replacement cost rental rates, management relies on available third-party data
and its own estimates of construction costs (including materials and labor in a
particular market) and assumes replacement cost rental rates are achieved at a
95% occupancy level. The Operating Partnership believes that the difference
between the two rates is a useful measure of the additional revenue that the
Operating Partnership may be able to obtain from a property, because the
difference should represent the amount by which rental rates would be required
to increase in order to justify construction of new properties. For the
Operating Partnership's Office Properties, the weighted average full-service
rental rate as of December 31, 1999 was $20.38 per square foot, compared to an
estimated weighted average full-service replacement cost rental rate of $28.49
per square foot.
COMPETITION
The Operating Partnership's Office Properties, primarily Class A
properties located within the Southwest, individually compete against a wide
range of property owners and developers, including property management companies
and other REITs, that offer space in similar types of office properties (for
example, Class A and Class B properties). A number of these owners and
developers may own more than one property. The number and type of competing
properties in a particular market or submarket could have a material effect on
the Operating Partnership's ability to lease space and maintain or increase
occupancy or rents in its existing Office Properties. Management believes,
however, that the quality services and individualized attention that the
Operating Partnership offers its tenants, together with its active preventive
maintenance program and superior building locations within markets, enhance the
Operating Partnership's ability to attract and retain tenants for its Office
Properties. In addition, as of December 31, 1999, on a weighted average basis,
the Operating Partnership owned
8
<PAGE> 10
16% of the Class A office space in the 30 submarkets in which the Operating
Partnership owned Class A office properties, and 9% of the Class B office space
in the five submarkets in which the Operating Partnership owned Class B office
properties. Management believes that ownership of a significant percentage of
office space in a particular market offers the Operating Partnership the
opportunity to reduce property operating expenses that the Operating Partnership
and its tenants pay, enhancing the Operating Partnership's ability to attract
and retain tenants and potentially resulting in increases in Operating
Partnership net revenues.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Property Dispositions
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership
recognized an impairment loss of approximately $16.8 million on one Office
Property held for disposition, which was sold during the first quarter of 2000.
The impairment loss represented the difference between the carrying value of the
Office Property and the sales price less costs of the sale. As of March 24,
2000, the Operating Partnership completed the sale of six wholly-owned Office
Properties, which were included in a group of ten Office Properties held for
disposition at December 31, 1999, and were actively being marketed for sale. The
sales generated approximately $146.6 million of net proceeds. Excluding the
impairment loss on one of the six Office Properties held for disposition at
December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership recognized a net gain of
approximately $13.3 million in the first quarter of 2000, related to the sales
of the other five Office Properties that were classified as held for disposition
at December 31, 1999. In addition, the Operating Partnership entered into
contracts relating to the sale of two additional Office Properties. The sales of
the additional Office Properties are expected to close by the end of the second
quarter of 2000. Management expects to complete any economically justified sales
of the remaining two Office Properties held for disposition at December 31, 1999
by the end of the second quarter of 2000. Management is currently in the process
of evaluating the bids for the remaining Office Properties to determine their
economic viability as well as the credit-worthiness of the potential purchasers
and their ability to close the transactions. The disposition of these Office
Properties remains subject to the negotiation of acceptable terms and other
customary conditions.
The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P., owned by the
Operating Partnership and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been
actively marketing for sale certain property assets (multi-family, retail, and
office/venture tech portfolios) located in The Woodlands, which includes the
Operating Partnership's four Retail Properties and 12 Office Properties located
in The Woodlands. The sale of four Retail Properties located in the Woodlands
closed on January 5, 2000, generating net proceeds of approximately $49.8
million, of which the Operating Partnership's portion was approximately $37.3
million, and a net gain of approximately $9.0 million, of which the Operating
Partnership's portion was approximately $7.7 million. The sale of The Woodlands
Office Properties is expected to close in the second quarter of 2000.
Investment in Broadband Office, Inc.
In October 1999, the Operating Partnership, along with seven other real
estate companies, joined with an unrelated third party venture capitalist as a
founding shareholder in Broadband Office, Inc. ("Broadband"), a national
telecommunications company. Broadband is dedicated to providing state of the art
broadband telecommunications services to commercial office properties across the
country. In addition to significantly improving the Operating Partnership's
office tenant amenity package to take advantage of evolving technologies, the
Operating Partnership received an equity interest and representation on the
board of directors of Broadband in exchange for granting Broadband marketing
access to the tenants within the Operating Partnership's Office Property
portfolio.
9
<PAGE> 11
HOSPITALITY SEGMENT
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
Because of the Company's status as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, the Operating Partnership does not operate the Hotel Properties. The
Operating Partnership has leased all of the Hotel Properties, except the Omni
Austin Hotel, to subsidiaries of COI pursuant to nine separate leases. The Omni
Austin Hotel has been leased, under a separate lease, to HCD Austin Corporation.
Under the leases, each having a term of 10 years, the Hotel Property lessees
have assumed the rights and obligations of the property owner under the
respective management agreements with the hotel operators, as well as the
obligation to pay all property taxes and other costs related to the Properties.
The Operating Partnership has agreed to fund all capital expenditures relating
to furniture, fixtures and equipment reserves required under the applicable
management agreements as part of each of the lease agreements for nine of the
Hotel Properties. The only exception is Canyon Ranch-Tucson, in which the Hotel
Property lessee owns all furniture, fixtures and equipment associated with the
property and will fund all related capital expenditures.
The leases provide for the payment by the Hotel Property lessees of all
or a combination of the following:
o base rent, with periodic rent increases if applicable (for 1999,
base rent represented approximately 70% of total hotel rental
revenues received from the hotel lessees);
o percentage rent based on a percentage of gross hotel receipts or
gross room revenues, as applicable, above a specified amount; and
o a percentage of gross food and beverage revenues above a specified
amount.
CRL INVESTMENTS, INC.
The Operating Partnership has a 95% economic interest, representing all
of the non-voting stock in CRL Investments, Inc. ("CRL"), which has a 20%
economic interest in CR License, LLC, the entity which owns the right to the
future use of the "Canyon Ranch" name. CRL has the opportunity through July 2000
to pay $3.0 million to obtain an additional 10% interest in CR License, LLC. CRL
also has an effective 60% economic interest in the Canyon Ranch Spa Club in the
Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Canyon Ranch Spa Club opened in June
1999 and is the first project to expand the franchise value of the "Canyon
Ranch" name.
See Item 2. Properties for more information about the Operating
Partnership's Hotel Properties.
MARKET INFORMATION
Average hotel room rental rates in the United States grew 4.0%, 4.4%,
6.2%, and 6.3% in 1999, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. Within the luxury
and upscale segments of the industry, average room rental rates increased
approximately 3.3% from 1998 to 1999. Industry information was compiled from
information published by Smith Travel Research.
Business and convention travel accounts for approximately two-thirds of
room demand and has risen along with the improving economy and increased
corporate profits. Domestic leisure travel has also increased, especially among
the "baby boomers", who are not only at the prime age for leisure travel but
also have a greater tendency to travel than previous generations. A healthier,
more active senior population is also contributing to the increase in travel.
With the aging of the "baby boomer" generation and the growing interest in
quality of life activities, the resort/spa industry also is experiencing
significant growth in the United States.
COMPETITION
Most of the Operating Partnership's upscale business class Hotel
Properties in Denver, Albuquerque, Austin and Houston are business and
convention center hotels that compete against other business and convention
center hotels. The Operating Partnership believes, however, that its luxury
resorts and spas and destination fitness resorts and spas are unique properties
that have insignificant direct competitors due either to their high replacement
cost or unique concept and location. The Hotel Properties do compete, to a
limited extent, against business class hotels or middle-market resorts in their
geographic areas, as well as against luxury resorts nationwide and around the
world.
10
<PAGE> 12
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In February 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into an agreement
with Sanjay Varma, a former senior executive officer of the Company, to form an
investment partnership which will seek luxury spa resorts and hotels to acquire
and manage under the "Sonoma Spa Resorts" brand and concept. The Operating
Partnership and Mr. Varma acquired a 93% and 7% interest, respectively, in this
new partnership. Mr. Varma has also established a new management company, which
has contracted with COI to manage either the property or assets of the Operating
Partnership's existing portfolio of Hotel Properties (excluding the Canyon Ranch
resorts and the Hyatt Regency Beaver Creek), in addition to new properties the
investment partnership acquires. The Operating Partnership currently holds a 30%
non-voting interest in this management company.
As part of its strategic plan, the Operating Partnership will seek to
reduce its investment in the upscale business class Hotel Properties over the
next two years. However, these Hotel Properties are not currently being actively
marketed for sale.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SEGMENT
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
The Operating Partnership owns economic interests in five Residential
Development Corporations through the Residential Development Property mortgages
and the non-voting common stock of these Residential Development Corporations.
The Residential Development Corporations in turn, through joint ventures or
partnership arrangements, currently own interests in 14 Residential Development
Properties. The Residential Development Corporations are responsible for the
continued development and the day-to-day operations of the Residential
Development Properties.
See Item 2. Properties for more information about the Operating
Partnership's Residential Development Properties.
COMPETITION
The Operating Partnership's Residential Development Properties compete
against a variety of other housing alternatives in each of their respective
areas. These alternatives include other planned developments, pre-existing
single-family homes, condominiums, townhouses and non-owner occupied housing,
such as luxury apartments. Management believes that The Woodlands Land Company,
Inc., Crescent Development Management Corp. ("CDMC") and Desert Mountain
Development Corp. ("Desert Mountain"), representing the Operating Partnership's
most significant investments in Residential Development Properties, contain
certain features that provide competitive advantages to these developments. The
Woodlands, which is an approximately 27,000-acre, master-planned residential and
commercial community north of Houston, Texas, is unique among developments in
the Houston area, because it functions as a self-contained community. Amenities
contained in the development, which are not contained within other local
developments, include a shopping mall, retail centers, office buildings, a
hospital, a community college, places of worship, a conference center, 60 parks,
81 holes of golf, two man-made lakes and a performing arts pavilion. The
Woodlands could be adversely affected by downturns in the Houston economy. CDMC
was formed for investing in resort residential real estate and resort operating
opportunities primarily in Colorado. Management believes CDMC does not have any
direct competitors because the locations of the projects are unique, the land is
limited and CDMC owns most of the land in each location. Desert Mountain, a
luxury residential and recreational community in Scottsdale, Arizona, which also
offers five 18-hole golf courses and tennis courts, does not have any
significant direct competitors due in part to the types of amenities that it
offers. Substantially all of the remaining residential lots for the four
developments that traditionally have competed with Desert Mountain were sold
during 1997. As a result, these developments have become resale communities that
no longer compete with Desert Mountain in any significant respect.
11
<PAGE> 13
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On April 29, 1999, a partnership in which CDMC has a 64% economic
interest finalized the purchase of Riverfront Park (previously known as "The
Commons"), a master planned residential development on 23 acres in the Central
Platte Valley near downtown Denver, Colorado for approximately $25 million. The
development of Riverfront Park is expected to begin in the spring of 2000. The
first phase will consist of one condominium project and two loft projects with
prices ranging from $0.2 million to $2.5 million. One of the first residential
projects, consisting of 71 lofts, commenced pre-selling in January 2000. As of
March 24, 2000, contracts had been signed on 83% of the 71 lofts. In the first
quarter of 2000, the partnership has entered into contracts relating to the sale
of 9.7 acres of Riverfront Park, which is expected to close in the second
quarter of 2000. The acreage is in close proximity to several major
entertainment and recreational facilities including Coors Field (home to the
Major League Baseball's Colorado Rockies), Elitch Gardens (an amusement park),
the new Pepsi Center (home to the National Hockey League's Colorado Avalanche
and the National Basketball Association's Denver Nuggets) and the new downtown
Commons Park. An adjacent 28 acres is expected to be commercially developed by
another company, thus providing a major mixed-use community adjacent to the
lower downtown area of Denver.
TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS SEGMENT
ORIGINAL OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
Prior to the restructuring of its investment in the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties in March 1999, the Operating
Partnership, through two subsidiaries (the "Crescent Subsidiaries"), owned an
indirect 38% interest in each of the three Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Partnerships. One of the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships owned
AmeriCold Corporation ("AmeriCold"), the second Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Partnership owned URS Logistics, Inc. ("URS") and the third
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnership owned the assets and business
operations acquired from Freezer Services, Inc. ("Freezer Services") and Carmar
Group, Inc. ("Carmar Group"). Vornado Realty Trust ("Vornado") owned a 60%
interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships and COI owned a 2%
indirect interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships.
In order to permit the Company to satisfy certain REIT qualification
requirements, the Operating Partnership (which is not permitted to operate the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties because of the Company's status as a
REIT) owned its indirect 38% interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Partnerships through its ownership of all of the nonvoting common stock,
representing a 95% economic interest, in each of the Crescent Subsidiaries, and
COI owned its 2% indirect interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Partnerships through its ownership of all of the voting common stock,
representing a 5% economic interest, in each of the Crescent Subsidiaries.
NEW OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
Effective March 12, 1999, the Operating Partnership, Vornado, the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships, the Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Corporations (including all affiliated entities that owned any portion
of the business operations of the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties at
that time) and COI restructured their investment in the Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Properties (the "Restructuring"). In the Restructuring, the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations (including all affiliated entities
that owned any portion of the business operations of the Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Properties) sold their ownership of the business operations to a newly
formed partnership ("AmeriCold Logistics") owned 60% by Vornado Operating L.P.
and 40% by a newly formed subsidiary of COI, in consideration of the payment of
$48.7 million by AmeriCold Logistics. AmeriCold Logistics, as lessee, entered
into triple-net master leases of the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties
with certain of the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations. Each of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties is subject to one or more of the
leases, each of which has an initial term of 15 years, subject to two, five-year
renewal options. Under the leases, AmeriCold Logistics is required to pay for
all costs arising from the operation, maintenance, and repair of properties as
well as property capital
12
<PAGE> 14
expenditures in excess of $5.0 million annually. For the period of March 12,
1999 to December 31, 1999, base rent and percentage rent was approximately
$135.8 million of which base rent represented approximately 80%. AmeriCold
Logistics has the right to defer a portion of the rent for up to three years
beginning on March 12, 1999 to the extent that available cash, as defined in the
leases, is insufficient to pay such rent, and pursuant thereto, rent was
deferred as of December 31, 1999, of which the Operating Partnership's share was
approximately $2.1 million.
In addition, in connection with the Restructuring and also effective
in March 1999, the Operating Partnership purchased from COI an additional 4%
nonvoting economic interest in each of the Crescent Subsidiaries for an
aggregate purchase price of $13.2 million. As a result, the Operating
Partnership holds an indirect 39.6% interest in the Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Partnerships and COI holds an indirect 0.4% interest in the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships. The Operating Partnership also
granted COI an option to require the Operating Partnership to purchase COI's
remaining 1% economic interest, representing all of the voting stock, in each of
the Crescent Subsidiaries at any time within the next two years, provided that
such purchase would not, in the opinion of counsel to the Company, adversely
affect the status of the Company as a REIT for an aggregate price, payable by
the Operating Partnership, of approximately $3.4 million.
The Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations, directly or
indirectly owned, as of December 31, 1999, approximately 89
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties, with an aggregate of approximately
428.3 million cubic feet (17.0 million square feet), with the operations
conducted pursuant to arrangements with national food suppliers.
See Item 2. Properties for more information about the Operating
Partnership's Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties.
INDUSTRY INFORMATION
AmeriCold Logistics provides frozen food manufacturers with
refrigerated warehousing and transportation management services. The
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties consist of production and
distribution facilities. Production facilities differ from distribution
facilities in that they typically serve one or a small number of customers
located nearby. These customers store large quantities of processed or partially
processed products in the facility until they are further processed or shipped
to the next stage of production or distribution. Distribution facilities
primarily serve customers who store a wide variety of finished products to
support shipment to end-users, such as food retailers and food service
companies, in a specific geographic market.
Transportation management services offered include freight routing,
dispatching, freight rate negotiation, backhaul coordination, freight bill
auditing, network flow management, order consolidation and distribution channel
assessment. AmeriCold Logistics' temperature-controlled logistics expertise and
access to both the frozen food warehouses and distribution channels enable the
customers of AmeriCold Logistics to respond quickly and efficiently to
time-sensitive orders from distributors and retailers.
Customers consist primarily of national, regional and local frozen food
manufacturers, distributors, retailers and food service organizations, including
ConAgra, Inc., H.J. Heinz Company, Kraft Foods, Inc., McCain Foods and Tyson
Foods, Inc.
COMPETITION
AmeriCold Logistics is the largest operator of public refrigerated
warehouse space in the country. AmeriCold Logistics operated an aggregate of
approximately 30% of total public refrigerated warehouse space as of December
31, 1999. No other person or entity operated more than 8% of total public
refrigerated warehouse space as of December 31, 1999. As a result, AmeriCold
Logistics does not have any competitors of comparable size. AmeriCold Logistics
operates in an environment in which competition is national, regional and local
in nature and in which the range of service, temperature-controlled logistics
facilities, customer mix, service performance and price are the principal
competitive factors.
13
<PAGE> 15
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE SEGMENT
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND RECAPITALIZATION
As of December 31, 1999, the Behavioral Healthcare Segment consisted of
88 Behavioral Healthcare Properties, all of which were leased to CBHS and its
subsidiaries under a triple-net master lease. CBHS is a Delaware limited
liability company which was formed to operate the behavioral healthcare
businesses located at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties and is owned 10% by a
subsidiary of Magellan and 90% by COI and an affiliate of COI. CBHS operates the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties through wholly owned subsidiaries.
CBHS's business has been negatively affected by many factors, including
adverse industry conditions. During 1999, CBHS failed to perform in accordance
with its operating budget. In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating
Partnership, COI, Magellan and CBHS completed a recapitalization of CBHS.
Pursuant to the recapitalization, Magellan transferred its remaining
hospital-based assets to CBHS, canceled its accrued franchise fees and
terminated the franchise agreements, pursuant to which Magellan had provided
certain services to CBHS in exchange for certain franchise fees. The Operating
Partnership also deferred the monthly rental payments due from CBHS for November
and December 1999 and amended its master lease with CBHS to provide a mechanism
to terminate the master lease as to certain Non-Core Behavioral Healthcare
Properties, and agreed that, upon each sale by the Operating Partnership of
Non-Core Behavioral Healthcare Properties, the monthly minimum rent due from
CBHS under the master lease would be reduced by a specified percentage of the
net proceeds of such sale. The Non-Core Behavioral Healthcare Properties consist
of 51 Properties at which CBHS has ceased operations or is planning to cease
operations.
PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating Partnership purchased
two Behavioral Healthcare Properties from Magellan for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $7.1 million in satisfaction of its obligations under an
agreement with Magellan entered into in November 1998. In addition, during the
fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating Partnership disposed of one Behavioral
Healthcare Property for approximately $1.4 million in net proceeds.
BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDING
On February 16, 2000, CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are subject
to the master lease with the Operating Partnership filed voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware. CBHS has stated in its bankruptcy petitions that it intends to sell
all of the ongoing businesses of CBHS and its subsidiaries by mid-May of 2000 or
develop an appropriate liquidation procedure if the sales have not taken place
by that time.
Effective February 29, 2000, pursuant to the referenced amendments to
the master lease, the Non-Core Properties ceased to be subject to the master
lease, although the aggregate rent due under the master lease was not reduced as
a result, except as described above, with respect to sales of Non-Core
Properties. The Operating Partnership is actively marketing these properties for
sale. From January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership sold 11
Non-Core Properties for approximately $34.9 million in net proceeds. As a result
of these sales and the sale of the one Behavioral Healthcare Property during the
fourth quarter of 1999, the amount of rent due under the master lease was
reduced in accordance with the amendments to the master lease. The Operating
Partnership has also entered into contracts or letters of intent to sell an
additional six Non-Core Properties. The Operating Partnership continues to
actively market the remaining 34 Non-Core Properties for sale.
As of December 31, 1999, the 37 Behavioral Healthcare Properties that
were not designated as Non-Core Properties are designated as Core Properties.
The Core Properties remain subject to the master lease. Payment and
14
<PAGE> 16
treatment of rent for the Behavioral Healthcare Properties is subject to a rent
stipulation agreed to by certain of the parties involved in the CBHS bankruptcy
proceeding.
In conjunction with the bankruptcy proceedings, a new subsidiary of COI
entered into an agreement for the purchase of CBHS's core operating assets,
subject to certain conditions, and the Operating Partnership agreed to lease the
Core Properties to the new subsidiary if it is successful in acquiring the core
operating assets of CBHS, subject to agreement on various terms of the lease and
certain additional conditions. COI has since announced that it does not expect
that the conditions will be satisfied and, therefore, does not expect to
conclude the purchase. The agreements expire on April 16, 2000 if the conditions
are not satisfied.
On April 24, 2000, an auction will be held for the core operating
assets of CBHS as part of the bankruptcy proceedings. The Operating Partnership
has agreed to provide an acceptable sales price for each of the remaining 37
Behavioral Healthcare Properties and, to the extent possible, acceptable lease
terms for continued operation of the Behavioral Healthcare Properties. Bidders
will have the opportunity to bid for any or all of the core operating assets of
CBHS and, in connection with a bid, either to bid to purchase the related
Behavioral Healthcare Property or Properties or to seek approval from the
Operating Partnership to lease the Property or Properties. Proceeds from the
sale of assets of CBHS will be available to pay creditors of CBHS. Proceeds from
any sales of the Behavioral Healthcare Properties will belong to the Operating
Partnership.
INDUSTRY INFORMATION
In an era of cost-containment and the reduction of dollars available
for care, behavioral healthcare providers such as CBHS have focused attention on
developing treatment approaches that respond to payors' increasing demands for
shorter stays, lower costs, and expanded access to care. Changes in the mix of
services, the prices of services, and the intensity of service are all part of
this response. These changes have also been bolstered by a rapidly expanding
science base, improved medications management, and the growing availability of
non-hospital treatment settings in more and more communities that help to make
it possible to manage complex and severe illnesses in less intensive treatment
settings. One of the effects that the behavioral healthcare industry is
experiencing is an increasing percentage of outpatient care. According to the
National Association of Psychiatric Health Systems 1998 Annual Survey Report,
the most recent available report, nearly one in four admissions in 1997 was to a
service other than inpatient hospitalization, compared to just one in ten
admissions in 1992. Although outpatient admissions are increasing and inpatient
admissions also are increasing, average length of stay is decreasing.
Due to these changes in the behavioral healthcare industry, the
position of a hospital or other behavioral care facility, such as the facilities
operated at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties, relative to its competitors
has been affected by its ability to obtain contracts with HMOs, PPOs and other
managed care plans for the provision of health care services. Although such
contracts generally provide for discounted services, pre-admission on
certification and concurrent length of stay reviews, they also provide a strong
patient referral base. The importance of entering into contracts with HMOs, PPOs
and other managed care companies varies from market to market and depends upon
the market strength of the particular managed care company.
The behavioral healthcare industry in general, and the facilities
operated at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties in particular, are influenced
by the cyclical nature of the business, with a reduced demand for services
during the summer months and around major holidays.
COMPETITION
In general, the operation of behavioral healthcare programs is
characterized by intense competition. The Operating Partnership anticipates that
competition will become more intense as pressure to contain the rising costs of
health care increases, particularly as programs such as those that are or may be
operated at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties are perceived to help contain
mental health care costs. Each of the facilities operated at the Behavioral
Healthcare Properties competes with other hospitals and behavioral healthcare
facilities. Some
15
<PAGE> 17
competing facilities are owned and operated by governmental agencies, others by
nonprofit organizations supported by endowments and charitable contributions.
The facilities operated at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties frequently draw
patients from areas outside their immediate locale and, therefore, these
facilities may, in certain markets, compete with both local and distant
hospitals and other facilities. In addition, the facilities operated at the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties compete not only with other psychiatric
hospitals, but also with psychiatric units in general hospitals. With respect to
outpatient services, the facilities operated at the Behavioral Healthcare
Properties compete with private practicing mental health professionals, publicly
funded mental health centers, and partial hospitalization and other intensive
outpatient services programs and facilities. The competitive position of a
particular facility is, to a significant degree, dependent upon the number and
quality of physicians who practice at the facility and who are members of its
medical staff. There can be no assurance that any operator of the behavioral
healthcare facilities will be able to compete effectively with its present or
future competitors, and any such inability could have a material adverse effect
on the operator's business, financial condition and results of operations and,
accordingly, on its ability to make rental payments to the Operating
Partnership.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Operating Partnership considers all of its Properties to be in good
condition, well-maintained and suitable and adequate to carry on the Operating
Partnership's business.
OFFICE PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership owned 89 Office
Properties located in 31 metropolitan submarkets in nine states with an
aggregate of approximately 31.8 million net rentable square feet. The Operating
Partnership's Office Properties are located primarily in the Dallas/Fort Worth
and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas. As of December 31, 1999, the Operating
Partnership's Office Properties in Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston represented an
aggregate of approximately 72% of its office portfolio based on total net
rentable square feet (39% for Dallas/Fort Worth and 33% for Houston).
In pursuit of management's objective to dispose of non-strategic and
non-core assets, the Operating Partnership was actively marketing for sale its
wholly owned interests in 10 Office Properties at December 31, 1999. The Office
Properties targeted for disposition represented an aggregate of approximately
2.9 million net rentable square feet in Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; New
Orleans, Louisiana; and Omaha, Nebraska. As of March 24, 2000, the Operating
Partnership completed the sale of six of the 10 Office Properties. The Office
Properties sold were: The Amberton, Concourse Office Park, The Meridian, and
Walnut Green Office Properties located in Dallas, Texas; the Energy Centre
Office Property located in New Orleans, Louisiana; and the Central Park Plaza
Office Property located in Omaha, Nebraska.
In addition, the Operating Partnership has entered into contracts
relating to the sale of two additional Office Properties; the AT&T Building
located in Denver, Colorado; and One Preston Park located in Dallas, Texas. The
sales of these Properties are expected to close by the end of the second quarter
of 2000. Management expects to complete any economically justified sales of the
remaining two Office Properties (Valley Centre located in Dallas, Texas; and
1615 Poydras located in New Orleans, Louisiana) by the end of the second quarter
of 2000. Management is currently in the process of evaluating the bids for the
remaining Properties to determine their economic viability as well as the
credit-worthiness of the potential purchasers and their ability to close the
transactions. The disposition of these Office Properties remains subject to the
negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions.
The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P., owned by the
Operating Partnership and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been
actively marketing for sale certain office/venture tech properties located in
The Woodlands, which includes the Operating Partnership's 12 Office Properties
located in The Woodlands with an aggregate of approximately 0.8 million net
rentable square feet. The sale of The Woodlands Office Properties is expected to
close in the second quarter of 2000.
OFFICE PROPERTIES TABLES
The following table shows, as of December 31, 1999, certain information
about the Operating Partnership's Office Properties. Based on rental revenues
from office and retail leases in effect as of December 31, 1999, no single
tenant accounted for more than 4% of the Operating Partnership's total Office
and Retail segment rental revenues for 1999.
16
<PAGE> 18
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
NET FULL-SERVICE
RENTABLE RENTAL RATE
NO. OF YEAR AREA PERCENT PER LEASED
STATE, CITY, PROPERTY PROPERTIES SUBMARKET COMPLETED (SQ. FT.) LEASED SQ. FT.(1)
--------------------- ---------- --------- --------- ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
TEXAS
DALLAS
Bank One Center(2) 1 CBD 1987 1,530,957 76% $ 21.94
The Crescent Office Towers 1 Uptown/Turtle Creek 1985 1,204,670 98 30.67
Fountain Place 1 CBD 1986 1,200,266 94 19.42
Trammell Crow Center(3) 1 CBD 1984 1,128,331 78(5) 23.87
Stemmons Place 1 Stemmons Freeway 1983 634,381 86 15.48
Spectrum Center(4) 1 Far North Dallas 1983 598,250 91 22.99
Waterside Commons 1 Las Colinas 1986 458,739 100 19.79
Caltex House 1 Las Colinas 1982 445,993 95 28.78
Reverchon Plaza 1 Uptown/Turtle Creek 1985 374,165 96 19.77
The Aberdeen 1 Far North Dallas 1986 320,629 100 18.44
MacArthur Center I & II 1 Las Colinas 1982/1986 294,069 99 21.04
Stanford Corporate Centre 1 Far North Dallas 1985 265,507 86(5) 18.69
The Amberton 1 Central Expressway 1982 255,052 79 13.94
Concourse Office Park 1 LBJ Freeway 1972-1986 244,879 89 15.54
12404 Park Central 1 LBJ Freeway 1987 239,103 100 21.24
Palisades Central II 1 Richardson/Plano 1985 237,731 62(5) 17.52
3333 Lee Parkway 1 Uptown/Turtle Creek 1983 233,769 92 21.13
Liberty Plaza I & II 1 Far North Dallas 1981/1986 218,813 100 15.71
The Addison 1 Far North Dallas 1981 215,016 100 18.54
The Meridian 1 LBJ Freeway 1984 213,915 94 17.32
Palisades Central I 1 Richardson/Plano 1980 180,503 84(5) 17.63
Walnut Green 1 Central Expressway 1986 158,669 72 16.21
Greenway II 1 Richardson/Plano 1985 154,329 100 22.59
Addison Tower 1 Far North Dallas 1987 145,886 91 16.82
Greenway I & IA 2 Richardson/Plano 1983 146,704 100 23.00
5050 Quorum 1 Far North Dallas 1981 133,594 89 17.19
Cedar Springs Plaza 1 Uptown/Turtle Creek 1982 110,923 96 18.20
Valley Centre 1 Las Colinas 1985 74,861 87(5) 17.70
One Preston Park 1 Far North Dallas 1980 40,525 71 18.08
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 30 11,460,229 89% $ 21.47
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
FORT WORTH
UPR Plaza 1 CBD 1982 954,895 95% $ 15.29
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
HOUSTON
Greenway Plaza Office 10 Richmond-Buffalo 1969-1982 4,286,277 91%(5) $ 17.34
Portfolio Speedway
Houston Center 3 CBD 1974-1983 2,764,418 96 17.21
Post Oak Central 3 West Loop/Galleria 1974-1981 1,277,516 93 17.80
The Woodlands Office
Properties(6) 12 The Woodlands 1980-1996 811,067 92 16.33
Four Westlake Park 1 Katy Freeway 1992 561,065 100 18.53
Three Westlake Park(7)(8) 1 Katy Freeway 1983 414,251 62 19.81
1800 West Loop South 1 West Loop/Galleria 1982 399,777 60(5) 17.31
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 31 10,514,371 91% $ 17.42
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
AUSTIN
Frost Bank Plaza 1 CBD 1984 433,024 96% $ 22.54
301 Congress Avenue(9) 1 CBD 1986 418,338 97 23.84
Bank One Tower 1 CBD 1974 389,503 94 19.41
Austin Centre 1 CBD 1986 343,665 91 21.61
The Avallon 1 Northwest 1993/1997 232,301 100 22.40
Barton Oaks Plaza One 1 Southwest 1986 99,895 100 21.93
--------- ------------- ------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 6 1,916,726 96% $ 22.00
--------- ------------- ------- ----------
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE> 19
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
NET FULL-SERVICE
RENTABLE RENTAL RATE
NO. OF YEAR AREA PERCENT PER LEASED
STATE, CITY, PROPERTY PROPERTIES SUBMARKET COMPLETED (SQ. FT.) LEASED SQ. FT.(1)
--------------------- ---------- --------- --------- ----------- ------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COLORADO
DENVER
MCI Tower 1 CBD 1982 550,807 99% $ 18.08
Ptarmigan Place 1 Cherry Creek 1984 418,630 97 (5) 18.49
Regency Plaza One 1 DTC 1985 309,862 97 22.88
AT&T Building 1 CBD 1982 184,581 82 (5) 15.33
The Citadel 1 Cherry Creek 1987 130,652 92 21.97
55 Madison 1 Cherry Creek 1982 137,176 86 (5) 18.90
44 Cook 1 Cherry Creek 1984 124,174 99 19.27
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 7 1,855,882 95% $ 19.18
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
COLORADO SPRINGS
Briargate Office and
and Research Center 1 Colorado Springs 1988 252,857 100% $ 18.98
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS
Energy Centre 1 CBD 1984 761,500 82%(5) $ 15.53
1615 Poydras 1 CBD 1984 508,741 83 16.33
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 2 1,270,241 83% $ 15.85
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
FLORIDA
MIAMI
Miami Center 1 CBD 1983 782,686 79%(5) $ 23.46
Datran Center 2 South Dade/Kendall 1986/1988 472,236 91 (5) 21.68
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 3 1,254,922 83% $ 22.72
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
ARIZONA
PHOENIX
Two Renaissance Square 1 Downtown/CBD 1990 476,373 96% $ 23.90
6225 North 24th Street 1 Camelback Corridor 1981 86,451 100 21.86
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 2 562,824 97% $ 23.57
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
WASHINGTON, D.C.
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Washington Harbour 2 Georgetown 1986 536,206 94%(5) $ 37.04
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
NEBRASKA
OMAHA
Central Park Plaza 1 CBD 1982 409,850 94% $ 15.88
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
Albuquerque Plaza 1 CBD 1990 366,236 92% $ 18.97
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
160 Spear Street 1 South of Market/CBD 1984 276,420 99% $ 25.82
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
SAN DIEGO
Chancellor Park(10) 1 UTC 1988 195,733 91%(5) $ 22.40
--------- ------------- ------- ---------
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 89 31,827,392 91%(5) $ 19.90(11)
========= ============= ======= ---------
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE> 20
- -----------------
(1) Calculated based on base rent payable as of December 31, 1999, without
giving effect to free rent or scheduled rent increases that would be
taken into account under GAAP and including adjustments for expenses
payable by or reimbursable from tenants.
(2) The Operating Partnership has a 49.5% limited partner interest and a
0.5% general partner interest in the partnership that owns Bank One
Center.
(3) The Operating Partnership owns the principal economic interest in
Trammell Crow Center through its ownership of fee simple title to the
Property (subject to a ground lease and a leasehold estate regarding
the building) and two mortgage notes encumbering the leasehold
interests in the land and building.
(4) The Operating Partnership owns the principal economic interest in
Spectrum Center through an interest in Spectrum Mortgage Associates
L.P., which owns both a mortgage note secured by Spectrum Center and
the ground lessor's interest in the land underlying the office
building.
(5) Leases have been executed at certain Office Properties but had not
commenced as of December 31, 1999. If such leases had commenced as of
December 31, 1999, the percent leased for all Office Properties would
have been 93%. The total percent leased for these Properties would have
been as follows: Trammell Crow Center - 89%; Stanford Corporate Center
- 92%; Palisades Central II - 69%; Palisades Central I - 95%; Valley
Centre - 90%; Greenway Plaza Office Portfolio- 96%; 1800 West Loop
South - 65%; Ptarmigan Place - 100%; AT&T Building - 89%; 55 Madison -
93%; Energy Centre - 86%; Miami Center - 87%; Datran Center - 95%;
Washington Harbour - 100%; and Chancellor Park - 94%.
(6) The Operating Partnership has a 75% limited partner interest and an
approximate 10% indirect general partner interest in the partnership
that owns the 12 Office Properties that comprise The Woodlands Office
Properties.
(7) The Property was primarily occupied by a major tenant until June 1999,
at which time the tenant made a payment of $4.7 million in connection
with its termination of the lease. Simultaneously with the lease
termination, the Operating Partnership leased approximately 41% of the
vacated space to a new tenant pursuant to a lease which commenced
September 1, 1999. An additional 21% of the vacated space was leased
and commenced prior to December 31, 1999.
(8) As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership owned the principal
economic interest in Three Westlake Park through its ownership of a
mortgage note secured by Three Westlake Park. Effective January 7,
2000, the Property was conveyed to the Operating Partnership by a deed
in lieu of foreclosure, and as a result, the Operating Partnership now
owns Three Westlake Park in fee simple.
(9) The Operating Partnership has a 1% general partner interest and a 49%
limited partner interest in the partnership that owns 301 Congress
Avenue.
(10) The Operating Partnership owns Chancellor Park through its ownership of
a mortgage note secured by the building and through its direct and
indirect interests in the partnership which owns the building.
(11) The weighted average full-service rental rate per square foot
calculated based on base rent payable for Operating Partnership Office
Properties as of December 31, 1999, giving effect to free rent and
scheduled rent increases that would be taken into consideration under
GAAP and including adjustments for expenses payable by or reimbursed
from tenants is $20.38.
19
<PAGE> 21
The following table provides information, as of December 31, 1999, for
the Operating Partnership's Office Properties by state, city, and submarket.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT
PERCENT OF LEASED AT OFFICE
TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING SUBMARKET
OPERATING OPERATING PARTNERSHIP PERCENT
NUMBER OF PARTNERSHIP PARTNERSHIP OFFICE LEASED/
STATE, CITY, SUBMARKET PROPERTIES NRA(1) NRA(1) PROPERTIES OCCUPIED(2)
---------------------- ---------- ------ ------ ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CLASS A OFFICE PROPERTIES
TEXAS
DALLAS
CBD 3 3,859,554 12% 82%(6) 86%
Uptown/Turtle Creek 4 1,923,527 6 97 90
Far North Dallas 7 1,897,695 6 94 76
Las Colinas 4 1,273,662 4 97 83
Richardson/Plano 5 719,267 2 84(6) 82
Stemmons Freeway 1 634,381 2 86 76
LBJ Freeway 2 453,018 1 97 84
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 26 10,761,104 33% 90% 83%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
FORT WORTH
CBD 1 954,895 3% 95% 87%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
HOUSTON
CBD 3 2,764,418 8% 96% 97%
Richmond-Buffalo Speedway 6 2,735,030 8 91(6) 95
West Loop/Galleria 4 1,677,293 5 85 94
Katy Freeway 2 975,316 3 84 80
The Woodlands 7 487,320 2 90 88
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 22 8,639,377 26% 90% 93%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
AUSTIN
CBD 4 1,584,530 5% 95% 98%
Northwest 1 232,301 1 100 87
Southwest 1 99,895 0 100 99
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 6 1,916,726 6% 96% 95%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
COLORADO
DENVER
Cherry Creek 4 810,632 3% 95% 87%
CBD 2 735,388 2 95 97
DTC 1 309,862 1 97 89
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 7 1,855,882 6% 95% 93%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
COLORADO SPRINGS
Colorado Springs 1 252,857 1% 100% 93%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS
CBD 2 1,270,241 4% 83% 87%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
FLORIDA
MIAMI
CBD 1 782,686 3% 79%(6) 93%
South Dade/Kendall 2 472,236 2 91(6) 93
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 3 1,254,922 5% 83% 93%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
ARIZONA
PHOENIX
Downtown/CBD 1 476,373 2% 97% 97%
Camelback Corridor 1 86,451 0 100 95
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 2 562,824 2% 97% 96%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
WASHINGTON D.C
WASHINGTON D.C
Georgetown 2 536,206 2% 94%(6) 98%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NEBRASKA
OMAHA
CBD 1 409,850 1% 94% 96%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
CBD 1 366,236 1% 92% 95%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
South of Market/CBD 1 276,420 1% 99% 98%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
SAN DIEGO
UTC 1 195,733 1% 91%(6) 93%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
CLASS A OFFICE PROPERTIES
SUBTOTAL/WEIGHTED
Average 76 29,253,273 92% 91% 90%
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
CLASS B OFFICE PROPERTIES
TEXAS
DALLAS
Central Expressway 2 413,721 1% 76% 84%
LBJ Freeway 1 244,879 1 89 81
Far North Dallas 1 40,525 0 71 83
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 4 699,125 2% 80% 82%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
HOUSTON
Richmond-Buffalo Speedway 4 1,551,247 5% 90% 94%
The Woodlands 5 323,747 1 96 96
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 9 1,874,994 6% 91% 94%
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
CLASS B OFFICE PROPERTIES
SUBTOTAL/WEIGHTED
AVERAGE 13 2,574,119 8% 88% 84%
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
CLASS A AND CLASS B
OFFICE PROPERTIES
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 89 31,827,392 100% 91%(6) 89%
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
Average
Operating
Weighted Operating Partnership
Operating Average Partnership Full-
Partnership Quoted Quoted Service
Share of Market Rental Rental
Office Rental Rate Rate Per Rate Per
Submarket Per Square Square Square
State, City, Submarket NRA(1)(2) Foot(2)(3) Foot(4) Foot(5)
---------------------- --------- ---------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CLASS A OFFICE PROPERTIES
TEXAS
DALLAS
CBD 21% $22.63 $25.99 $21.57
Uptown/Turtle Creek 32 26.55 30.06 26.79
Far North Dallas 18 24.53 24.26 19.33
Las Colinas 12 25.09 25.39 23.05
Richardson/Plano 14 23.47 23.25 20.17
Stemmons Freeway 26 23.10 19.75 15.48
LBJ Freeway 5 24.00 21.61 19.46
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 17% $24.10 $25.61 $21.83
---------- ------ ------ ------
FORT WORTH
CBD 24% $19.38 $19.54 $15.29
---------- ------ ------ ------
HOUSTON
CBD 11% $23.00 $23.82 $17.21
Richmond-Buffalo Speedway 56 20.60 21.38 18.43
West Loop/Galleria 13 22.07 23.04 17.71
Katy Freeway 13 22.26 24.44 18.94
The Woodlands 100 16.54 16.54 16.81
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 17% $21.61 $22.56 $17.85
---------- ------ ------ ------
AUSTIN
CBD 44% $30.04 $31.08 $21.94
Northwest 10 27.81 27.00 22.40
Southwest 4 27.57 24.50 21.93
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 23% $29.64 $30.24 $22.00
---------- ------ ------ ------
COLORADO
DENVER
Cherry Creek 45% $23.59 $22.30 $19.23
CBD 7 24.71 22.75 17.46
DTC 6 25.41 26.00 22.88
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 11% $24.34 $23.09 $19.18
---------- ------ ------ ------
COLORADO SPRINGS
Colorado Springs 6% $19.99 $21.29 $18.98
---------- ------ ------ ------
LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS
CBD 14% $16.43 $16.10 $15.85
---------- ------ ------ ------
FLORIDA
MIAMI
CBD 23% $28.96 $30.50 $23.46
South Dade/Kendall 100 23.46 23.46 21.68
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 33% $26.89 $27.85 $22.72
---------- ------ ------ ------
ARIZONA
PHOENIX
Downtown/CBD 27% $23.02 $22.00 $23.90
Camelback Corridor 2 27.36 21.00 21.86
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 10% $23.69 $21.85 $23.57
---------- ------ ------ ------
WASHINGTON D.C
WASHINGTON D.C
Georgetown 100% $36.68 $36.68 $37.04
---------- ------ ------ ------
NEBRASKA
OMAHA
CBD 32% $18.61 $18.50 $15.88
---------- ------ ------ ------
NEW MEXICO
ALBUQUERQUE
CBD 64% $19.10 $19.50 $18.97
---------- ------ ------ ------
CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
South of Market/CBD 2% $49.30 $42.00 $25.82
---------- ------ ------ ------
SAN DIEGO
UTC 7% $29.88 $30.30 $22.40
---------- ------ ------ ------
CLASS A OFFICE PROPERTIES
SUBTOTAL/WEIGHTED
Average 16% $23.70 $24.44 $20.28
========== ====== ====== ======
CLASS B OFFICE PROPERTIES
TEXAS
DALLAS
Central Expressway 11% $18.44 $18.78 $14.78
LBJ Freeway 2 19.03 18.40 15.54
Far North Dallas 0 19.88 19.50 18.08
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 3% $18.73 $18.69 $15.25
---------- ------ ------ ------
HOUSTON
Richmond-Buffalo Speedway 47% $18.85 $20.24 $15.37
The Woodlands 100 15.07 15.07 15.65
---------- ------ ------ ------
Subtotal/Weighted Average 51% $18.20 $19.35 $15.42
---------- ------ ------ ------
CLASS B OFFICE PROPERTIES
SUBTOTAL/WEIGHTED
AVERAGE 9% $18.34 $19.17 $15.38
========== ====== ====== ======
CLASS A AND CLASS B
OFFICE PROPERTIES
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 15% $23.27 $24.01 $19.90(7)
========== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) NRA means net rentable area in square feet.
(2) Market information is for Class A office space under the caption "Class
A Office Properties" and market information is for Class B office space
under the caption "Class B Office Properties." Sources are
CoStar/Jamison, (for the Dallas CBD, Uptown/Turtle Creek, Far North
Dallas, Las Colinas, Richardson/Plano, Stemmons Freeway, LBJ Freeway
and Central Expressway, Fort Worth CBD and the New Orleans CBD
submarkets), The Baca Group (for the Houston Richmond-Buffalo Speedway,
CBD and West Loop/Galleria and Katy Freeway submarkets), The Woodlands
Operating Company, L.P. (for The Woodlands submarket), CB Richard Ellis
(for the Austin CBD, Northwest and Southwest submarkets), Cushman &
Wakefield of Colorado, Inc. (for the Denver Cherry Creek, CBD and DTC
submarkets), Turner Commercial Research (for the Colorado Springs
market), Grubb and Ellis Company (for the Phoenix Downtown/CBD,
Camelback Corridor and San Francisco South of Market/CBD submarkets),
Grubb and Ellis Company and the Company (for the Washington D.C.
Georgetown submarket), Grubb and Ellis/Pacific Realty Group, Inc. (for
the Omaha CBD submarket), Building Interests, Inc. (for the Albuquerque
CBD submarket), RealData Information Systems, Inc. (for the Miami CBD
and South Dade/Kendall submarkets) and CoStar/John Burnham & Company
(for the San Diego UTC submarket).
(3) Represents full-service quoted market rental rates. These rates do not
necessarily represent the amounts at which available space at the
Office Properties will be leased. The weighted average subtotals and
total are based on total net rentable square feet of Operating
Partnership Office Properties in the submarket.
(4) For Office Properties, represents weighted average rental rates per
square foot quoted by the Operating Partnership as of December 31,
1999, based on total net rentable square feet of Operating Partnership
Office Properties in the submarket, adjusted, if necessary, based on
management estimates, to equivalent full-service quoted rental rates to
facilitate comparison to weighted average Class A or Class B, as the
case may be, quoted submarket rental rates per square foot. These rates
do not necessarily represent the amounts at which available space at
the Operating Partnership's Office Properties will be leased.
(5) Calculated based on base rent payable for Operating Partnership Office
Properties in the submarket as of December 31, 1999, without giving
effect to free rent or scheduled rent increases that would be taken
into account under GAAP and including adjustments for expenses payable
by or reimbursed from tenants, divided by total net rentable square
feet of Operating Partnership Office Properties in the submarket.
(6) Leases have been executed at certain Properties in these submarkets but
had not commenced as of December 31, 1999. If such leases had commenced
as of December 31, 1999, the percent leased for all Office Properties
in the Operating Partnership's submarkets would have been 93%. The
total percent leased for these Class A Operating Partnership submarkets
would have been as follows: Dallas CBD - 86%; Dallas Richardson/Plano -
88%; Houston Richmond - Buffalo Speedway - 96%; Miami CBD - 87%; Miami
South Dade/Kendall - 95%; Washington D.C. Georgetown - 100%; and San
Diego UTC - 94%.
(7) The weighted average full-service rental rate per square foot
calculated based on base rent payable for Operating Partnership Office
Properties as of December 31, 1999, giving effect to free rent and
scheduled rent increases that would be taken into consideration under
GAAP and including adjustments for expenses payable by or reimbursed
from tenants is $20.38.
20
<PAGE> 22
The following table shows, as of December 31, 1999, the principal
businesses conducted by the tenants at the Operating Partnership's Office
Properties, based on information supplied to the Operating Partnership from the
tenants.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percent of
Industry Sector Leased Sq. Ft.
- ------------------------------ -----------------
<S> <C>
Professional Services(1) 27%
Financial Services(2) 20
Energy(3) 19
Telecommunications 7
Technology 6
Retail 4
Medical 3
Food Service 3
Manufacturing 3
Government 2
Other(4) 6
----------------
TOTAL LEASED 100%
================
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) Includes legal, accounting, engineering, architectural, and advertising
services.
(2) Includes banking, title and insurance, and investment services.
(3) Of the 19% of energy tenants at the Operating Partnership's Office
Properties, 63% are located in Houston, 24% are located in Dallas, 7%
are located in Denver and 6% are located in New Orleans. Of the 63% of
energy tenants located in Houston (approximately 3.7 million square
feet), 66% (approximately 2.4 million square feet) are obligated under
long-term leases (expiring in 2004 or later).
(4) Includes construction, real estate, transportation and other
industries.
AGGREGATE LEASE EXPIRATIONS OF OFFICE PROPERTIES
The following tables show schedules of lease expirations for leases in
place as of December 31, 1999 for the Operating Partnership's total Office
Properties and for Dallas and Houston, Texas, individually, for each of the 10
years beginning with 2000, assuming that none of the tenants exercises or has
exercised renewal options.
TOTAL OFFICE PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET RENTABLE PERCENTAGE OF
AREA LEASED NET
NUMBER OF REPRESENTED RENTABLE AREA
TENANTS WITH BY EXPIRING REPRESENTED
YEAR OF LEASE EXPIRING LEASES BY EXPIRING
EXPIRATION LEASES (SQUARE FEET) LEASES
---------- ------ ------------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
2000 588 3,733,754(2) 13.1%
2001 413 3,757,711 13.2
2002 407 4,054,356 14.2
2003 294 2,892,182 10.1
2004 297 4,436,077 15.6
2005 91 2,475,989 8.7
2006 44 1,173,796 4.1
2007 40 1,406,752 4.9
2008 32 1,111,917 3.9
2009 19 624,431 2.2
2010 and thereafter 25 2,851,241 10.0
-------------- ---------- -----------
2,250 28,518,206(3) 100.0%
============== ========== ===========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE
TOTAL OF ANNUAL FULL-
ANNUAL ANNUAL FULL- SERVICE RENT
FULL-SERVICE SERVICE RENT PER SQUARE
RENT UNDER REPRESENTED FOOT OF NET
YEAR OF LEASE EXPIRING BY EXPIRING RENTABLE AREA
EXPIRATION LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING (1)
---------- ---------- ------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $ 72,033,578 11.9% $19.29
2001 72,588,010 12.0 19.32
2002 85,179,300 14.0 21.01
2003 56,714,636 9.3 19.61
2004 95,012,506 15.7 21.42
2005 55,123,113 9.0 22.26
2006 26,581,991 4.4 22.65
2007 32,078,424 5.3 22.80
2008 27,829,120 4.6 25.03
2009 16,345,094 2.7 26.18
2010 and thereafter 67,484,874 11.1 23.67
-------------- -------- ----------------
$ 606,970,646 100.0% $21.28
============== ======== ================
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) Calculated based on base rent payable under the lease for net
rentable square feet expiring, without giving effect to free
rent or scheduled rent increases that would be taken into
account under GAAP and including adjustments for expenses
payable by or reimbursable from tenants based on current
levels.
(2) As of December 31, 1999, leases have been signed for
approximately 1,655,276 net rentable square feet (including
renewed leases and leases of previously unleased space)
commencing in 2000.
21
<PAGE> 23
(3) Reconciliation to the Operating Partnership's total Office Property net
rentable area is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SQUARE PERCENTAGE
FEET OF TOTAL
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Square footage leased to tenants 28,518,206 89.6%
Square footage reflecting
management offices, building use,
and remeasurement adjustments 284,295 0.9
Square footage vacant 3,024,891 9.5
---------- ----------
Total net rentable square footage 31,827,392 100.0%
========== ==========
</TABLE>
DALLAS OFFICE PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE
NET RENTABLE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL OF ANNUAL FULL-
AREA LEASED NET ANNUAL ANNUAL FULL- SERVICE RENT
NUMBER OF REPRESENTED RENTABLE AREA FULL-SERVICE SERVICE RENT PER SQUARE
TENANTS WITH BY EXPIRING REPRESENTED RENT UNDER REPRESENTED FOOT OF NET
YEAR OF LEASE EXPIRING LEASES BY EXPIRING EXPIRING BY EXPIRING RENTABLE AREA
EXPIRATION LEASES (SQUARE FEET) LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING (1)
- ------------------- ------------ ------------ ------- ------------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2000 212 1,873,892(2) 18.5% $ 39,003,440 17.1% $20.81
2001 143 1,171,410 11.6 24,947,776 10.9 21.30
2002 123 1,068,631 10.5 25,562,095 11.2 23.92
2003 88 1,185,742 11.7 23,486,432 10.3 19.81
2004 95 1,088,124 10.7 26,986,381 11.8 24.80
2005 20 1,199,492 11.8 25,654,231 11.3 21.39
2006 14 240,536 2.4 6,341,975 2.8 26.37
2007 15 606,309 6.0 14,603,527 6.4 24.09
2008 12 586,526 5.8 14,519,218 6.4 24.75
2009 8 380,025 3.7 9,516,050 4.2 25.04
2010 and thereafter 4 738,666 7.3 17,399,764 7.6 23.56
------------ ------------ ------- ------------ ------- -------
734 10,139,353 100.0% $228,020,889 100.0% $22.49
============ ============ ======= ============ ======= =======
</TABLE>
- ------------------
(1) Calculated based on base rent payable under the lease for net rentable
square feet expiring, without giving effect to free rent or scheduled
rent increases that would be taken into account under GAAP and
including adjustments for expenses payable by or reimbursable from
tenants based on current levels.
(2) As of December 31, 1999, leases have been signed for approximately
738,506 net rentable square feet (including renewed leases and leases
of previously unleased space) commencing in 2000.
HOUSTON OFFICE PROPERTIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE
NET RENTABLE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL OF ANNUAL FULL-
AREA LEASED NET ANNUAL ANNUAL FULL- SERVICE RENT
NUMBER OF REPRESENTED RENTABLE AREA FULL-SERVICE SERVICE RENT PER SQUARE
TENANTS WITH BY EXPIRING REPRESENTED RENT UNDER REPRESENTED FOOT OF NET
YEAR OF LEASE EXPIRING LEASES BY EXPIRING EXPIRING BY EXPIRING RENTABLE AREA
EXPIRATION LEASES (SQUARE FEET) LEASES LEASES (1) LEASES EXPIRING (1)
- ------------------- ------------ ------------ ------- ------------ ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2000 194 959,986(2) 10.1% $ 15,058,758 8.2% $15.69
2001 131 1,640,539 17.3 28,202,207 15.4 17.19
2002 150 1,288,025 13.6 23,726,974 12.9 18.42
2003 96 849,835 9.0 15,321,601 8.3 18.03
2004 98 1,817,969 19.2 34,374,426 18.7 18.91
2005 19 201,470 2.1 3,900,181 2.1 19.36
2006 12 604,927 6.4 12,553,291 6.8 20.75
2007 8 502,817 5.3 9,986,515 5.4 19.86
2008 7 183,719 1.9 3,242,296 1.8 17.65
2009 2 48,538 0.5 1,150,095 0.6 23.69
2010 and thereafter 10 1,394,957 14.6 36,004,607 19.8 25.81
------------ ------------ ------- ------------ ------- -------
727 9,492,782 100.0% $183,520,951 100.0% $19.33
============ ============ ======= ============ ======= =======
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE> 24
- ------------------------
(1) Calculated based on base rent payable under the lease for net rentable
square feet expiring, without giving effect to free rent or scheduled
rent increases that would be taken into account under GAAP and
including adjustments for expenses payable by or reimbursable from
tenants based on current levels.
(2) As of December 31, 1999, leases have been signed for approximately
469,939 net rentable square feet (including renewed leases and leases
of previously unleased space) commencing in 2000.
RETAIL PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership owned seven Retail
Properties, which in the aggregate contain approximately 779,000 net rentable
square feet. Four of the Retail Properties, The Woodlands Retail Properties,
with an aggregate of approximately 358,000 net rentable square feet, were
located in The Woodlands, a master-planned development located 27 miles north of
downtown Houston, Texas. On January 5, 2000, the sale of The Woodlands Retail
Properties was completed. Two of the Retail Properties, Las Colinas Plaza, with
approximately 135,000 net rentable square feet, and The Crescent Atrium with
approximately 95,000 net rentable square feet, are located in submarkets of
Dallas, Texas. The remaining Retail Property, The Park Shops at Houston Center,
with an aggregate of approximately 191,000 net rentable square feet, is located
in the CBD submarket of Houston, Texas. As of December 31, 1999, the Retail
Properties were 95% leased.
23
<PAGE> 25
HOTEL PROPERTIES
HOTEL PROPERTIES TABLES
The following table shows certain information for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998, about the Operating Partnership's Hotel Properties.
The information for the Hotel Properties is based on available rooms, except for
Canyon Ranch-Tucson and Canyon Ranch-Lenox, which are destination resorts and
spas that measure their performance based on available guest nights.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------
REVENUE
AVERAGE AVERAGE PER
OCCUPANCY DAILY AVAILABLE
YEAR RATE RATE ROOM
COMPLETED/ ------------ ------------- --------------
HOTEL PROPERTY(1) LOCATION RENOVATED ROOMS 1999 1998 1999 1998 1999 1998
- ----------------- -------- ---------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
UPSCALE BUSINESS CLASS HOTELS:
Denver Marriott City Center Denver, CO 1982/1994 613 80% 80% $124 $124 $ 99 $100
Four Seasons Hotel-Houston(2) Houston, TX 1982 399 66 65 197 181 129 118
Hyatt Regency Albuquerque Albuquerque, NM 1990 395 66 69 106 103 70 71
Omni Austin Hotel Austin, TX 1986 372(4) 76 77 125 114 94 88
Renaissance Houston Hotel(3) Houston, TX 1975 389 63 67 94 93 59 62
----- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ----
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 2,168 71% 72% $129 $123 $ 91 $ 89
===== == == ==== ==== ==== ====
LUXURY RESORTS AND SPAS:
Hyatt Regency Beaver Creek Avon, CO 1989 276(5) 72% 69% $244 $233 $175 $162
Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa Sonoma, CA 1927/1987/1997 178(6) 79 82 225 235 179 194
Ventana Inn & Spa Big Sur, CA 1975/1982/1988 62 78 63(7) 388 387 302 245(7)
----- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ----
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 516 75% 73% $255 $249 $191 $183
===== == == ==== ==== ==== ====
Guest
DESTINATION FITNESS RESORTS AND SPAS: Nights
-------
Canyon Ranch-Tucson Tucson, AZ 1980 250(8)
Canyon Ranch-Lenox Lenox, MA 1989 212(8)
----- -- -- ---- ---- ---- ----
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE 462 87%(9) 86%(9) $543(10) $508(10) $451(11) $422(11)
===== == == ==== ==== ==== ====
GRAND TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR HOTEL PROPERTIES 3,146 74% 75% $218 $207 $161 $154
===== == == ==== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
- -----------------------------
(1) Because of the Company's status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes,
the Operating Partnership does not operate the Hotel Properties and has
leased all of the Hotel Properties, except the Omni Austin Hotel, to COI
pursuant to long term leases. As of January 1, 1999, the Omni Austin Hotel
is leased pursuant to a separate long term lease, to HCD Austin
Corporation.
(2) The hotel is undergoing a $5 million renovation of all guest rooms and
common areas scheduled to be completed during the third quarter of 2000.
(3) The hotel is undergoing a $15 million renovation project scheduled to be
completed in October 2000. The renovation includes improvements to all
guest rooms, the lobby, corridor, and exterior and interior systems.
(4) As of December 31, 1999, 58 condominiums have been converted to hotel
suites.
(5) In 1998, the number of rooms was reduced to 276 due to 19 rooms being
converted into a 20,000 square foot spa.
(6) In February 1999, 20 rooms were taken out of commission for construction of
the spa, which is part of an approximately $20 million expansion scheduled
to be completed in April 2000. The expansion will also include the
construction of 30 additional guest rooms. Rates were discounted during the
construction period, which resulted in a lower average daily rate and
revenue per available room in 1999, as compared to 1998.
(7) Temporarily closed from February 1, 1998 through May 1, 1998 due to
flooding in the region, affecting the roadway passage to the hotel.
(8) Represents available guest nights, which is the maximum number of guests
that the resort can accommodate per night.
(9) Represents the number of paying and complimentary guests for the period,
divided by the maximum number of available guest nights for the period.
(10) Represents the average daily "all-inclusive" guest package charges for the
period, divided by the average daily number of paying guests for the
period.
(11) Represents the total "all-inclusive" guest package charges for the period,
divided by the maximum number of available guest nights for the period.
24
<PAGE> 26
TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS PROPERTIES
TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS PROPERTIES TABLE
The following table shows the number and aggregate size of
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties by state as of December 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL CUBIC TOTAL TOTAL CUBIC TOTAL
NUMBER OF FOOTAGE SQUARE FEET NUMBER OF FOOTAGE SQUARE FEET
STATE PROPERTIES(1) (IN MILLIONS) (IN MILLIONS) STATE PROPERTIES(1) (IN MILLIONS) (IN MILLIONS)
----- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Alabama 4 9.4 0.3 Mississippi 1 4.7 0.2
Arizona 1 2.9 0.1 Missouri(2) 2 37.9 2.2
Arkansas 6 33.1 1.0 Nebraska 2 4.4 0.2
California 9 28.6 1.1 New York 1 11.8 0.4
Colorado 2 3.4 0.1 North Carolina 3 8.5 0.3
Florida 5 7.5 0.3 Oklahoma 2 2.1 0.1
Georgia 7 44.5 1.6 Oregon 6 40.4 1.7
Idaho 2 18.7 0.8 Pennsylvania 2 27.4 0.9
Illinois 2 11.6 0.4 South Carolina 1 1.6 0.1
Indiana 1 9.1 0.3 South Dakota 1 2.9 0.1
Iowa 2 12.5 0.5 Tennessee 3 10.6 0.4
Kansas 2 5.0 0.2 Texas 2 6.6 0.2
Kentucky 1 2.7 0.1 Utah 1 8.6 0.4
Maine 1 1.8 0.2 Virginia 2 8.7 0.3
Massachusetts 6 15.2 0.7 Washington 6 28.7 1.1
Wisconsin 3 17.4 0.7
------------ ----------- ------------
TOTAL 89(3) 428.3(3) 17.0(3)
============ =========== ============
</TABLE>
- ----------------------
(1) As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership held an indirect 39.6%
interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships, which own
the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations, which directly or
indirectly owned the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. The
business operations associated with the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Properties are owned by AmeriCold Logistics, in which the Operating
Partnership has no interest. The Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Corporations are entitled to receive lease payments (base rent and
percentage rent) from AmeriCold Logistics.
(2) Includes an underground storage facility, with approximately 33.1 million
cubic feet.
(3) As of December 31, 1999, AmeriCold Logistics operated 104
temperature-controlled logistics properties with an aggregate of
approximately 519.2 million cubic feet (19.9 million square feet).
25
<PAGE> 27
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES TABLE
The following table shows certain information as of December 31, 1999,
relating to the Residential Development Properties.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL TOTAL LOTS/UNITS LOTS/UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT LOTS/ DEVELOPED CLOSED
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES TYPE OF CORPORATION'S UNITS SINCE SINCE
CORPORATION (1) (RDP) RDP(2) LOCATION OWNERSHIP % PLANNED INCEPTION INCEPTION
--------------- ----------- ------- -------- ------------- ------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Desert Mountain Desert Mountain SF Scottsdale, AZ
Development 93.0% 2,665 2,265 1,980
Corp. -------- -------- --------
The Woodlands The Woodlands SF The Woodlands, TX
Land Company, 42.5% 36,385 22,240 20,721
Inc. -------- -------- --------
Crescent Deer Trail SFH Avon, CO 60.0% 16(6) 11 11
Development Buckhorn
Management Townhomes TH Avon, CO 60.0% 24(6) 22 22
Corp. Bear Paw Lodge CO Avon, CO 60.0% 53(6) 11 11
QuarterMoon TH Avon, CO 64.0% 13(6) -- --
Eagle Ranch SF Eagle, CO 60.0% 1,100(6) 90 88
Main Street
Junction CO Breckenridge, CO 60.0% 36(6) 18 13
Riverbend SF Charlotte, NC 60.0% 650 -- --
Three Peaks
(Eagle's Nest) SF Silverthorne, CO 30.0% 391(6) 75 71
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL CRESCENT DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT CORP. 2,283 227 216
-------- -------- --------
Mira Vista Mira Vista SF Fort Worth, TX 100.0% 757 740 628
Development The Highlands SF Breckenridge, CO 12.3% 750 323 311
Corp. -------- -------- --------
TOTAL MIRA VISTA DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1,507 1,063 939
-------- -------- --------
Houston Area Falcon Point SF Houston, TX 100.0% 1,205 556 543
Development Spring Lakes SF Houston, TX 100.0% 536 161 110
Corp. -------- -------- --------
TOTAL HOUSTON AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP. 1,741 717 653
-------- -------- --------
TOTAL 44,581 26,512 24,509
======== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
Average
Residential Closed Range of
Residential Development Sale Price Proposed
Development Properties Type of Per Lot/ Sale Prices
Corporation (1) (RDP) RDP(2) Location Unit ($)(3) Per Lot/Unit ($)(4)
- ----------------- ------------ ------- --------- ------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Desert Mountain Desert Mountain SF Scottsdale, AZ
Development 480,000 375,000 - 3,000,000(5)
Corp.
The Woodlands The Woodlands SF The Woodlands, TX
Land Company, 48,131 13,600 - 500,000
Inc.
Crescent Deer Trail SFH Avon, CO 2,930,000 2,695,000 - 4,075,000
Development Buckhorn
Management Townhomes TH Avon, CO 1,300,000 1,420,000 - 1,870,000
Corp. Bear Paw Lodge CO Avon, CO 1,675,000 665,000 - 2,025,000
QuarterMoon TH Avon, CO N/A 1,850,000 - 2,795,000
Eagle Ranch SF Eagle, CO 111,500 80,000 - 150,000
Main Street
Junction CO Breckenridge, CO 475,000 300,000 - 580,000
Riverbend SF Charlotte, NC N/A 23,000 - 30,000
Three Peaks
(Eagle's Nest) SF Silverthorne, CO 220,000 135,000 - 425,000
TOTAL CRESCENT DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT CORP.
Mira Vista Mira Vista SF Fort Worth, TX 100,000 50,000 - 265,000
Development The Highlands SF Breckenridge, CO 148,000 55,000 - 450,000
Corp.
TOTAL MIRA VISTA DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Houston Area Falcon Point SF Houston, TX 31,000 22,000 - 60,000
Development Spring Lakes SF Houston, TX 28,000 22,000 - 33,000
Corp.
TOTAL HOUSTON AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP.
TOTAL
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) The Operating Partnership has an approximately 95%, 95%, 90%, 94% and 94%,
ownership interest in Desert Mountain Development Corp., The Woodlands Land
Company, Inc., Crescent Development Management Corp., Mira Vista
Development Corp., and Houston Area Development Corp., respectively,
through ownership of non-voting common stock in each of these Residential
Development Corporations.
(2) SF (Single-Family Lots); CO (Condominium); TH (Townhome); TS (Timeshare);
and SFH (Single Family Homes).
(3) Based on lots/units closed during the Operating Partnership's ownership
period.
(4) Based on existing inventory of developed lots and lots to be developed.
(5) Includes golf membership, which for 1999, is approximately $175,000.
(6) As of December 31, 1999, two units were under contract at Deer Trail
representing $5.9 million in sales, two units were under contract at
Buckhorn Townhomes representing $3.3 million in sales, 32 units were under
contract at Bear Paw Lodge representing $43.6 million in sales, 11 units
were under contract at QuarterMoon representing $24.7 million in sales, 73
lots were under contract at Eagle Ranch representing $10.5 million in
sales, six units were under contract at Main Street Junction representing
$2.5 million in sales, and 27 lots were under contract at Three Peaks
representing $6.4 million in sales.
26
<PAGE> 28
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 1999, the Behavioral Healthcare Segment consisted of
88 Behavioral Healthcare Properties, all of which were leased to CBHS and its
subsidiaries under a triple-net master lease. CBHS is a Delaware limited
liability company which was formed to operate the behavioral healthcare
businesses located at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties and is owned 10% by a
subsidiary of Magellan and 90% by COI and an affiliate of COI. CBHS operates the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties through wholly owned subsidiaries.
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating Partnership purchased
two Behavioral Healthcare Properties from Magellan for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $7.1 million in satisfaction of its obligations under an
agreement with Magellan entered into in November 1998. In addition, during the
fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating Partnership disposed of one Behavioral
Healthcare Property for approximately $1.4 million in net proceeds.
On February 16, 2000, CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are subject
to the master lease with the Operating Partnership filed voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware. CBHS has stated in its bankruptcy petitions that it intends to sell
all of the ongoing businesses of CBHS and its subsidiaries by mid-May of 2000 or
develop an appropriate liquidation procedure if the sales have not taken place
by that time.
Effective February 29, 2000, the Non-Core Properties ceased to be
subject to the master lease, although the aggregate rent due under the master
lease was not reduced as a result except with respect to the sales of Non-Core
Properties. The Operating Partnership is actively marketing these Properties for
sale. From January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership sold 11
Non-Core Properties for approximately $34.9 million in net proceeds. As a result
of these sales and the sale of the one Behavioral Healthcare Property during the
fourth quarter of 1999, the amount of rent due under the master lease was
reduced in accordance with the amendments to the master lease. The Operating
Partnership has also entered into contracts or letters of intent to sell an
additional six Non-Core Properties. The Operating Partnership continues to
actively market the remaining 34 Non-Core Properties for sale.
The Core Properties remain subject to the master lease. The Operating
Partnership intends to sell the Core Properties or lease them to new tenants in
connection with CBHS's bankruptcy proceedings.
For more information on CBHS, the voluntary filing of the Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions, the Operating Partnership's investment in the Behavioral
Healthcare Properties and the master lease, see Item 1. Business - Industry
Segments - Behavioral Healthcare Segment and Item 7 - Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Behavioral
Healthcare Segment.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the Registrant's fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
27
<PAGE> 29
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS
MARKET INFORMATION AND DISTRIBUTIONS
There is no established public trading market for the Registrant's
limited partner interests, including the associated units ("Units"). The
following table sets forth the cash distributions paid per Unit during each
quarter of fiscal years 1998 and 1999 Comparable cash distributions are expected
in the future. As of March 24, 2000, there were 49 record holders of Units. The
Company and CREE, Ltd. do not own Units.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Quarter Ended: 1999 Distributions 1998 Distributions
-------------- ------------------ ------------------
<S> <C> <C>
March 31 $1.10 $0.76
June 30 $1.10 $0.76
September 30 $1.10 $1.10
December 31 $1.10 $1.10
</TABLE>
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
In connection with the acquisition of real estate, the Operating
Partnership from time to time issues Units, or commits to issue Units in the
future, to sellers of real estate in reliance on exemptions from registration
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"). In 1999, the Operating
Partnership issued 85,910 Units in offerings exempt from the registration
requirements of the Act pursuant to agreements entered into in connection with
property acquisitions in 1996 and 1998 as set forth below:
o On May 3, 1999, the Operating Partnership issued 48,410 Units to two
unaffiliated third parties in satisfaction of certain obligations
related to that certain Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated as
of March 20, 1998 as amended, by and among Lano International, Inc.,
Armada/Hoffler Holding Company and Alan R. Novak.
o On June 3, 1999, the Operating Partnership issued 37,500 Units to an
unaffiliated third party in satisfactions of certain obligations
related to that certain Contribution Agreement dated as of September
13, 1996, as amended, by and among the Operating Partnership, the
Company, Rahn Sonoma, Ltd., John H. Anderson and Peter H. Roberts, and
that certain Waiver and Agreement dated as of June 3, 1999 by and
among the Operating Partnership, the Company, John H. Anderson, Peter
H. Roberts and Peter H. Henry.
The Operating Partnership exercised reasonable care to assure that each of
the offerees of Units was an "accredited investor" under Rule 501 of the Act and
that the investors were not purchasing the Units with a view to their
distribution. Specifically, the Operating Partnership relied on the exemptions
provided by Section 4(2) of the Act or Rule 506 under the Act. Each of the Units
is exchangeable into common shares of the Company on a one-for-two basis at the
option of the holder. In case of an attempted exchange, the Company may elect to
pay to the converting holder the cash value of the common shares to be received
upon exchange instead of delivering such shares.
28
<PAGE> 30
ITEM 6 . SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table includes certain financial information for the
Operating Partnership on a consolidated historical basis. You should read this
section in conjunction with Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data.
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenue .................................... $ 746,279 $ 698,343 $ 447,373 $ 208,861 $ 129,960
Operating income (loss) .......................... (54,954) 143,893 111,281 44,101 30,858
Income before minority
interests and extraordinary
item ........................................ 13,343 183,210 135,024 47,951 36,358
Basic earnings per unit of partnership interest:
Income (loss) before extraordinary
item ........................................ $ (0.09) $ 2.52 $ 2.50 $ 1.44 $ 1.32
Net income (loss) ............................. (0.09) 2.52 2.50 1.44 1.32
Diluted earnings per unit of partnership interest:
Income (loss) before extraordinary
item ........................................ $ (0.09) $ 2.42 $ 2.41 $ 1.40 $ 1.30
Net income (loss) ............................. (0.09) 2.42 2.41 1.35 1.30
BALANCE SHEET DATA
(AT PERIOD END):
Total assets ..................................... $ 4,951,420 $ 5,045,949 $ 4,182,875 $ 1,733,540 $ 965,232
Total debt ....................................... 2,598,929 2,318,156 1,710,124 667,808 444,528
Total partners' capital .......................... 2,156,863 2,551,624 2,317,353 988,005 479,517
OTHER DATA:
Funds from Operations(1) ......................... $ 355,777 $ 360,148 $ 214,396 $ 87,616 $ 64,475
Cash distribution declared per
unit of partnership interest .................. $ 4.40 $ 3.72 $ 2.74 $ 1.32 $ 1.10
Weighted average
units of partnership interest
outstanding - basic ........................... 67,977,021 66,214,702 53,417,789 32,342,421 27,091,093
Weighted average
units of partnership interest
outstanding - diluted ......................... 68,945,780 70,194,031 55,486,729 32,932,758 27,249,845
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities .......................... $ 296,146 $ 277,092 $ 211,550 $ 77,384 $ 64,877
Investing activities .......................... (164,662) (798,007) (2,294,766) (513,033) (421,306)
Financing activities .......................... (169,210) 564,680 2,123,744 444,315 343,079
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------
(1) Funds from Operations ("FFO"), based on the revised definition adopted
by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and as used herein, means net income
(loss) (determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and
sales of property, excluding adjustments not of a normal recurring
nature, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and
after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
For a more detailed definition and description of FFO, see Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
29
<PAGE> 31
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read this section in conjunction with the selected financial
data and the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes in
Item 6. Selected Financial Data and Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, respectively, of this report. Historical results and
percentage relationships set forth in these Items and this section should not be
taken as indicative of future operations of the Operating Partnership or the
Company. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this section, have
the meanings given to them in Items 1 - 6 of this Form 10-K.
The limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership
acknowledges that all of the Company's operating expenses are incurred for the
benefit of the Operating Partnership and provides that the Operating Partnership
shall reimburse the Company for all such expenses. Accordingly, expenses of the
Company are reimbursed by the Operating Partnership.
This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are generally
characterized by terms such as "believe", "expect" and "may".
Although the Operating Partnership believes that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions, the Operating Partnership's actual results could differ materially
from those given in the forward-looking statements.
The following factors might cause such a difference:
o The Operating Partnership's ability to timely lease unoccupied
square footage and timely re-lease occupied square footage
upon expiration;
o Changes in real estate conditions (including rental rates and
competition from other properties and new development of
competing properties);
o The concentration of a significant percentage of the Operating
Partnership's assets in Texas;
o Financing risks, such as the ability to generate revenue
sufficient to service existing debt, increases in debt service
associated with variable-rate debt, the ability to meet
existing financial covenants and the Operating Partnership's
ability to consummate planned financings and refinancings on
the terms and within the time frames anticipated;
o The Operating Partnership's ability to close anticipated sales
of assets or joint venture transactions or other pending
transactions;
o The failure of CBHS as debtor in possession to negotiate or
consummate an acceptable sale of its core operating assets in
the on-going bankruptcy proceedings;
o The failure of CBHS, any successful purchaser or purchasers of
such core operating assets out of bankruptcy, and the
Operating Partnership to negotiate and consummate leases for
the core facilities or the inability of the Operating
Partnership to secure on a timely basis the release of
hospital facilities from the debtor in possession;
o The failure of the purchaser or purchasers of the core
operating assets of CBHS, following any purchase and
bankruptcy restructuring, to fulfill all new lease obligations
to the Operating Partnership over the long term;
o The Operating Partnership's ability to close sales of the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties;
o The Operating Partnership's ability to find acquisition and
development opportunities which meet the Operating
Partnership's investment strategy;
o The existence of complex regulations relating to the Company's
status as a REIT, the effect of future changes in REIT
requirements as a result of new legislation and the adverse
consequences of the failure to qualify as a REIT;
o Adverse changes in the financial condition of existing
tenants; and
30
<PAGE> 32
o Other risks detailed from time to time in the Operating
Partnership's and the Company's filings with the SEC.
Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on such statements. The Operating Partnership is not obligated to
update these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or
circumstances.
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE
John C. Goff, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trust Managers of the
Company, was appointed to the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company and CREE, Ltd. on June 11, 1999. As announced in August, 1999,
Mr. Goff and the management team outlined the following immediate objectives:
o resolve the issues surrounding the Behavioral Healthcare
Segment;
o reduce exposure to variable-rate debt;
o dispose of non-strategic or non-core assets within the
investment segments;
o market certain of the Office Properties for joint ventures;
and
o engage the Company in a share repurchase program.
CBHS
CBHS's business has been negatively affected by many factors, including
adverse industry conditions. During 1999, CBHS failed to perform in accordance
with its operating budget. In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating
Partnership, COI, Magellan and CBHS completed a recapitalization of CBHS.
Pursuant to the recapitalization, Magellan transferred its remaining
hospital-based assets to CBHS, canceled its accrued franchise fees and
terminated the franchise agreements, pursuant to which Magellan had provided
certain services to CBHS in exchange for certain franchise fees. The Operating
Partnership also deferred the monthly rental payments due from CBHS for November
and December 1999 and amended its master lease with CBHS to provide a mechanism
to terminate the master lease as to certain non-core Behavioral Healthcare
Properties, and agreed that, upon each sale by the Operating Partnership of the
non-core Behavioral Healthcare Properties, the monthly minimum rent due from
CBHS under the master lease would be reduced by a specified percentage of the
net proceeds of such sale. The non-core Behavioral Healthcare Properties consist
of 51 Properties which CBHS has ceased operations or is planning to cease
operations (the "Non-Core Properties").
As of December 31, 1999, the Behavioral Healthcare Segment consisted of
88 Behavioral Healthcare Properties in 24 states, all of which were leased to
CBHS and its subsidiaries under a triple-net master lease. On February 16, 2000,
CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are subject to the master lease with the
Operating Partnership filed voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. CBHS has stated in
its bankruptcy petitions that it intends to sell all of the ongoing businesses
of CBHS and its subsidiaries by mid-May of 2000 or develop an appropriate
liquidation procedure if the sales have not taken place by that time.
Effective February 29, 2000, pursuant to the referenced amendments to
the master lease, the Non-Core Properties ceased to be subject to the master
lease, although the aggregate rent due under the master lease was not reduced as
a result except as described above with respect to Non-Core Properties. The
Operating Partnership is actively marketing these Properties for sale. From
January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating Partnership sold 11 Non-Core
Properties for approximately $34.9 million in net proceeds. As a result of these
sales and the sale of the one Behavioral Healthcare Property during the fourth
quarter of 1999, the amount of rent due under the master lease was reduced in
accordance with the amendments to the master lease. The Operating Partnership
has also entered into contracts or letters of intent to sell an additional six
Non-Core Properties. The Operating Partnership continues to actively market the
remaining 34 Non-Core Properties for sale.
As of December 31, 1999, the 37 Behavioral Healthcare Properties that
were not designated as Non-Core Properties are designated as "Core-Properties."
The Core Properties remain subject to the master lease. Payment and treatment of
rent for the Behavioral Healthcare Properties is subject to a rent stipulation
agreed to by certain of the parties involved in the CBHS bankruptcy proceeding.
31
<PAGE> 33
The Operating Partnership intends to sell the Core Properties or lease
them to new tenants.
On April 24, 2000, an auction will be held for the core operating
assets of CBHS as part of the bankruptcy proceedings. The Operating Partnership
has agreed to provide an acceptable sales price for each of the remaining 37
Behavioral Healthcare Properties and, to the extent possible, acceptable lease
terms for continued operation of the Behavioral Healthcare Properties. Bidders
will have the opportunity to bid for any or all of the core operating assets of
CBHS and, in connection with a bid, either to bid to purchase the related
Behavioral Healthcare Property or Properties or to seek approval from the
Operating Partnership to lease the Property or Properties. Proceeds from the
sale of core operating assets of CBHS will be available to pay creditors of
CBHS. Proceeds from any sales of the Behavioral Healthcare Properties will
belong to the Operating Partnership.
Exposure to Variable-rate Debt
Since the announcement of the Operating Partnership's Strategic Plan in
August 1999, the Operating Partnership fixed or hedged approximately $400
million of its variable-rate debt in 1999. During the first quarter of 2000, the
Operating Partnership repaid and retired its unsecured, variable-rate credit
facility (the "Credit Facility") from a group of banks led by BankBoston, N.A
("BankBoston") and its term note with BankBoston primarily with the proceeds of
a new secured, variable-rate facility (the "New Facility") from UBS AG ("UBS").
Effective February 4, 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into a three-year
cash flow hedge agreement with Fleet Boston Financial, relating to a portion of
the New Facility for a notional amount of $200.0 million. As a result, $200.0
million of the amount under the note, which was originally issued at a floating
rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points, was effectively converted to a fixed
weighted average interest rate of 9.61% through maturity. The refinancings and
cash flow hedges reduced the Operating Partnership's variable-rate debt exposure
to less than 30% of total debt. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - New
Facility" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Interest Rate Hedging
Transactions" for additional information.
Assets Held for Disposition
During 1999, the Operating Partnership identified the following assets
for disposition. These assets are either non-strategic or non-core assets within
the Operating Partnership's investment segments. The proceeds generated from the
remaining assets held for disposition are expected to be used to further reduce
the Operating Partnership's remaining variable-rate debt, make investments, fund
a share repurchase program, or any combination of these options.
o Dallas Mavericks Interest - On October 27, 1999, the Operating
Partnership completed the sale of its non-core equity and debt
interests in the Dallas Mavericks, interest in the new Dallas
sports arena development and surrounding mixed-use development
projects and certain promissory notes related to the Dallas
Mavericks for approximately $89 million in cash. In connection
with the sale, the Operating Partnership recognized a net loss
of approximately $0.7 million. The proceeds were primarily
used to pay down variable-rate debt.
o The Woodlands Commercial Properties - The Woodlands Commercial
Properties Company, L.P., owned by the Operating Partnership
and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been
actively marketing for sale certain property assets
(multi-family, retail and office/venture tech portfolios)
located in The Woodlands. As of December 31, 1999, the
multi-family portfolio had been sold, generating net proceeds
of approximately $28.8 million, of which the Operating
Partnership's portion was approximately $12.2 million. The
sale generated a net gain of approximately $11.6 million, of
which the Operating Partnership's portion was approximately
$4.9 million. The sale of the retail portfolio, including the
Operating Partnership's four Retail Properties located in The
Woodlands, closed on January 5, 2000, and generated
approximately $49.8 million of net proceeds, of which the
Operating Partnership's portion was approximately $37.3
million. The Woodlands Retail Properties were sold at a net
gain of approximately $9.0 million, of which the Operating
Partnership's portion was approximately $7.7 million. The
proceeds from these sales were used primarily to pay down
variable-rate debt. In addition, the sale of the
office/venture tech portfolio, consisting of the Operating
Partnership's 12 Office Properties located in The Woodlands is
expected to close in the second quarter of 2000.
o Office Properties - For the year ended December 31, 1999, the
Operating Partnership recognized an impairment loss of
approximately $16.8 million on one of the Office Properties
held for disposition at December 31, 1999, which was sold
during the first quarter of 2000. The impairment loss
represented the
32
<PAGE> 34
difference between the carrying value of the Office Property
and the sales price less costs of the sale. As of March 24,
2000, the Operating Partnership completed the sale of six
wholly-owned Office Properties which were included in the
group of ten Office Properties held for disposition at
December 31, 1999 and were being actively marketed for sale.
The sales generated approximately $146.6 million of net
proceeds. The proceeds were primarily used to pay down
variable-rate debt. Excluding the impairment loss on one of
the six Office Properties held for disposition at December 31,
1999, the Operating Partnership recognized a net gain of
approximately $13.3 million in the first quarter of 2000,
related to the sales of the other five Office Properties that
were classified as held for disposition at December 31, 1999.
The Operating Partnership has entered into contracts relating
to the sale of two additional Office Properties. The sale of
these Properties are expected to close by the end of the
second quarter of 2000. Management expects to complete any
economically justified sales of the remaining two Office
Properties held for disposition as of December 31, 1999 by the
end of the second quarter of 2000.
o Behavioral Healthcare Properties - The Behavioral Healthcare
Segment consisted of 88 Properties in 24 states as of December
31, 1999. From January 1 through March 24, 2000, 11 Non-Core
Properties were sold for approximately $34.9 million in net
proceeds. The proceeds were primarily used to pay down
variable-rate debt. The Operating Partnership has also entered
into contracts or letters of intent to sell an additional six
Non-Core Properties. The Operating Partnership continues to
actively market the remaining 34 Non-Core Properties for sale.
The Operating Partnership intends to sell the 37 Core
Properties or lease them to new tenants.
Management is currently in the process of evaluating the bids for the
remaining Properties held for disposition to determine their economic viability
as well as the credit-worthiness of the potential purchasers and their ability
to close the transactions. The disposition of these Properties remains subject
to the negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions.
Joint Ventures
The Operating Partnership is currently seeking to enter into venture
arrangements with private equity partners for arrangements where the Operating
Partnership would hold a minority interest in the Properties and would continue
to lease and manage the Properties.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 5, 1999, the Company's Board of Trust Managers authorized
the repurchase of a portion of its outstanding common shares from time to time
in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in an amount
not to exceed $500.0 million. The proposed repurchases will be subject to
prevailing market conditions and other considerations. The repurchase of common
shares by the Company would decrease the Company's limited partner interest,
which would result in an increase of net income per unit and book value per
unit. The Company expects the share repurchase program to be funded through a
combination of asset sales and financing arrangements, which, in some cases, may
be secured by the repurchased shares. The amount of shares that the Company
actually will purchase will be determined from time to time, in its reasonable
judgement, based on market conditions and the availability of funds, among other
factors. There can be no assurance that any number of shares actually will be
purchased within any particular time period.
On November 19, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with UBS
which was amended on January 4, 2000 and which, as amended, obligates the
Company to repurchase approximately 5.8 million common shares from UBS, or
settle in common shares, on specified terms, before January 4, 2001. See
"Liquidity and Capital Resources - Share Repurchase Agreement" for a description
of this transaction.
33
<PAGE> 35
OFFICE AND RETAIL SEGMENT
The following tables show the same-store net operating income growth
for the 27.1 million square feet of Office Property space owned as of January 1,
1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, PERCENTAGE/
--------------------------- POINT
1999 1998 INCREASE
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Same-store Revenues $ 518.0 $ 488.8 6.0%
Same-store Expenses (225.4) (213.8) 5.4%
---------- ----------
Net Operating Income $ 292.6 $ 275.0 6.4%
========== ==========
Weighted Average Occupancy 91.1% 90.1% 1.0pt
</TABLE>
The following table shows selected leasing and rental rate information
for the 31.8 million square feet of Office Property owned as of December 31,
1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SIGNED EXPIRING PERCENTAGE
LEASES LEASES INCREASE
----------------------- ------------------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Renewed or re-leased(1) 2,646,000 sq. ft. N/A N/A
Weighted average full-
service rental rate(2) $21.72 per sq. ft. $18.30 per sq. ft. 19%
FFO annual net effective
rental rate(3) $13.63 per sq. ft. $10.26 per sq. ft. 33%
</TABLE>
- -------------------
(1) All of which have commenced or will commence during the next twelve
months.
(2) Including free rent, scheduled rent increases taken into account under
GAAP and expense recoveries.
(3) Calculated as weighted average full-service rental rate minus operating
expenses.
o For the year ended December 31, 1999, leases executed for
renewal or re-leased Office Property space required tenant
improvements of $1.15 per square foot per year and leasing
costs of $0.72 per square foot per year. "Renewal" refers to
leases executed by existing tenants for exactly the same net
rentable area currently occupied by those tenants. "Re-lease"
refers to leases executed by new or existing tenants for net
rentable area which has been vacant for six months or less.
o The overall office portfolio was approximately 92.7% leased,
based on executed leases, or approximately 90.5% leased based
on commenced leases, at December 31, 1999. Average occupancy
for 1999 based on commenced leases was approximately 90.9%.
Investment in Broadband Office, Inc.:
In October 1999, the Operating Partnership, along with seven other real
estate companies, joined with an unrelated third party venture capitalist as a
founding shareholder in Broadband, a national telecommunications company.
Broadband is dedicated to providing state of the art broadband
telecommunications services to commercial office properties across the country.
In addition to significantly improving the Operating Partnership's office tenant
amenity package to take advantage of evolving technologies, the Operating
Partnership received an equity interest and representation on the board of
directors of Broadband in exchange for granting Broadband marketing access to
the tenants within the Operating Partnership's Office Property portfolio.
34
<PAGE> 36
HOSPITALITY SEGMENT
The following table shows the percentage increases in occupancy,
average daily rate and revenue per available room for the Hotel Properties for
the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR PERCENTAGE/
ENDED DECEMBER 31, POINT
-------------------------------- INCREASE
1999 1998 (DECREASE)
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average occupancy 74 % 75 % (1)pt
Average daily rate $ 218 $ 207 5 %
Revenue per available room $ 161 $ 154 5 %
</TABLE>
o For the year ended December 31, 1999, hotel property rental
income growth, including weighted average base rent(1) and
percentage rent, was approximately 12.3%(2) compared with the
same period of 1998, for the eight Hotel Properties owned as
of January 1, 1998.
- -----------------------
(1) Including scheduled rent increases that would be taken into account
under GAAP.
(2) This growth was impacted by returns generated on approximately $38
million of capital invested during 1998 and 1999 in connection with the
construction of The Allegria Spa at the Hyatt Regency Beaver Creek
hotel, the construction of The Allegria Spa at Ventana Inn & Spa, the
Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa expansion and the renovation of guest rooms at
the Four Seasons-Houston hotel.
Investment Partnership:
In February 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into an agreement
with Sanjay Varma, a former senior executive officer of the Operating
Partnership, to form an investment partnership, which will seek luxury spa
resorts and hotels to acquire and manage under the "Sonoma Spa Resorts" brand
and concept. The Operating Partnership and Mr. Varma acquired a 93% and 7%
interest, respectively, in this new partnership. Mr. Varma has also established
a new management company, which has contracted with COI to manage either the
property or assets of the Operating Partnership's existing portfolio of Hotel
Properties (excluding the Canyon Ranch resorts and the Hyatt Regency Beaver
Creek), in addition to new properties the investment partnership acquires. The
Operating Partnership currently holds a 30% non-voting interest in this
management company.
CRL Investments, Inc.:
The Operating Partnership has a 95% economic interest, representing all
of the non-voting stock in CRL Investments, Inc. ("CRL"), which has a 20%
economic interest in CR License, LLC, the entity which owns the right to the
future use of the "Canyon Ranch" name. CRL has the opportunity through July 2000
to pay $3.0 million to obtain an additional 10% interest in CR License, LLC. CRL
also has an effective 60% economic interest in the Canyon Ranch Spa Club in the
Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Canyon Ranch Spa Club opened in June
1999 and is the first project to expand the franchise value of the "Canyon
Ranch" name.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SEGMENT
The Operating Partnership owns economic interests in five Residential
Development Corporations through the residential development property mortgages
and the non-voting common stock of these Residential Development Corporations.
The Residential Development Corporations in turn, through joint ventures or
partnership arrangements, currently own interests in 14 Residential Development
Properties. The Residential Development Corporations are responsible for the
continued development and the day-to-day operations of the Residential
Development Properties. Management plans to maintain the Residential Development
segment at its current investment level and reinvest returned capital into
residential development projects that it expects to achieve comparable rates of
return.
35
<PAGE> 37
The Woodlands Land Development, L.P. and The Woodlands Commercial Properties
Company, L.P. (collectively "The Woodlands"), The Woodlands, Texas:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------
1999 1998
--------------------- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Residential lot sales 1,991 1,462
Average sales price per lot(1) $ 45,843 $ 52,581
Commercial land sales 76 acres 205 acres
Average sales price per acre $ 344,995 $ 227,383
</TABLE>
- --------------------------------
(1) Decrease in average sales price per lot between years is due to a
change in product mix.
o Residential lot sales increased by 529 or 36%, in 1999
compared with 1998.
o Future buildout of The Woodlands is estimated at approximately
15,600 residential lots and approximately 1,972 acres of
commercial land, of which 1,519 residential lots and 991 acres
are currently in inventory.
o The Woodlands estimates that sales of approximately 2,000 to
2,100 residential lots and 75 to 85 acres of commercial land
will close during 2000.
Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership ("Desert Mountain"), Scottsdale,
Arizona:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1999 1998
-------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Residential lot sales 258 258
Average sales price per lot(1) $ 533,000 $ 430,000
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
(1) Including equity golf memberships.
o The average price per lot for the year ended 1999 increased
24% compared to the year ended 1998, as a result of a higher
price product mix sold in 1999 versus 1998.
o During 1999, Desert Mountain opened five new villages in
Saguaro Forest consisting of 160 additional lots. Desert
Mountain has sold 95 of these lots with an average sales price
of $619,000 per lot.
o Future buildout of Desert Mountain is estimated at
approximately 685 residential lots, of which 285 are currently
in inventory.
o Desert Mountain is anticipating the release in the year 2000
of three new villages within Saguaro Forest consisting of
approximately 106 lots with prices from $500,000 to $2.6
million per lot.
36
<PAGE> 38
Crescent Development Management Corporation ("CDMC"), Beaver Creek, Colorado:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998
--------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Active projects 11 5
Residential lot sales 410 48
Townhome sales 32 27
Single-family home sales 11 --
Equivalent timeshare unit sales 6 32
Condominium sales 24 --
</TABLE>
o On April 29, 1999, a partnership in which CDMC has a 64% economic
interest finalized the purchase of Riverfront Park (previously known as
"The Commons"), a master planned residential development on 23 acres in
the Central Platte Valley near downtown Denver, Colorado for
approximately $25 million. The development of Riverfront Park is
expected to begin in the spring of 2000. The first phase will consist
of one condominium project and two loft projects with prices ranging
from $0.2 million to $2.5 million. One of the first residential
projects, consisting of 71 lofts, commenced pre-selling in January
2000. As of March 24, 2000, contracts had been signed on 83% of the 71
lofts. In the first quarter of 2000, the partnership has entered into
contracts relating to the sale of 9.7 acres of Riverfront Park, which
is expected to close in the second quarter of 2000. The acreage is in
close proximity to several major entertainment and recreational
facilities including Coors Field (home to the Major League Baseball's
Colorado Rockies), Elitch Gardens (an amusement park), the new Pepsi
Center (home to the National Hockey League's Colorado Avalanche and the
National Basketball Association's Denver Nuggets) and the new downtown
Commons Park. An adjacent 28 acres is expected to be commercially
developed by another company, thus providing a major mixed-use
community adjacent to the lower downtown area of Denver.
o CDMC estimates the following sales for the year 2000 from its 10 active
projects: 383 residential lots, 17 townhomes, 5 single-family homes,
and 44 condominiums.
o 99% of the sales anticipated during the first quarter and 71% of the
sales anticipated for the full year of 2000 have been pre-sold as of
December 31, 1999.
Mira Vista Development Corp. ("Mira Vista"), Fort Worth, Texas:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Residential lot sales 69 79
Average sales price per lot $ 121,000 $ 111,000
</TABLE>
Houston Area Development Corp. ("Houston Area Development"), Houston, Texas:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998
------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Residential lot sales 243 181
Average sales price per lot $ 28,000 $ 25,000
</TABLE>
37
<PAGE> 39
TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS SEGMENT
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership held an indirect
39.6% interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships, which owns
the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations, which directly or indirectly
owned the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. The business operations
associated with the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties are owned by
AmeriCold Logistics, in which the Operating Partnership has no interest. The
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations are entitled to receive lease
payments (base rent and percentage rent) from AmeriCold Logistics.
Management believes that earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization ("EBITDA") is a useful financial performance measure for
assessing the relative stability of the financial condition of the AmeriCold
Logistics, which is the sole lessee of the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Properties.
This table shows AmeriCold Logistics, pro forma EBITDA for the year
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, assuming that the acquisitions by one of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations of 14 Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Properties had occurred on January 1, 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(IN MILLIONS)
-------------------------------------
1999 1998
---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Pro forma EBITDA(1) $ 164.8 $ 152.4
Pro forma lease payment $ 164.0 $ 149.1
</TABLE>
- ------------
(1) EBITDA does not represent net income or cash flows from operating,
financing or investing activities as defined by GAAP.
o During 1999, the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations
completed and opened $46 million of expansion and new product,
representing approximately 15.1 million cubic feet (0.5 million square
feet).
o The Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations currently have
approximately $30.6 million of expansion and new temperature-controlled
logistics facilities under construction, which management of AmeriCold
Logistics expects will be completed in the second quarter of 2000, and
which are expected to contain approximately 16.6 million cubic feet
(0.8 million square feet).
o The Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations have approximately
$50 to $75 million of expansion and new product temperature-controlled
logistics facilities under review for development or acquisition during
2000.
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE SEGMENT
During the year ended December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership
received cash rental payments of approximately $35.3 million from CBHS. CBHS's
business has been negatively affected by many factors, including adverse
industry conditions. During 1999, CBHS failed to perform in accordance with its
operating budget. See "Strategic Plan Update - CBHS" above for a complete
description of the current status of CBHS, the voluntary filing of Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions by CBHS and its subsidiaries and the Operating
Partnership's investment in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
The following financial statement charges were made with respect to the
Operating Partnership's investment in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties for
the year ended December 31, 1999:
o CBHS rent was reflected on a cash basis beginning in the third
quarter of 1999 and CBHS rent will continue to be reflected on
a cash basis going forward;
o The Operating Partnership wrote-off the rent that was deferred
according to the CBHS lease agreement from the commencement of
the lease in June of 1997 through June 30, 1999. The balance
written-off totaled $25.6 million;
38
<PAGE> 40
o The Operating Partnership wrote-down its behavioral healthcare
real estate assets by approximately $103.8 million to a book
value of $245.0 million;
o The Operating Partnership recorded approximately $15.0 million
of additional expense to be used by CBHS as working capital;
and
o The Operating Partnership has not recorded depreciation
expense on the Non-Core Properties since November 1999 when
such Properties were classified as held for disposition.
At December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's investment in the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties represented approximately 5% of its total
assets (after the impairment and other charges related to the behavioral
healthcare assets) and approximately 5% of consolidated rental revenues for the
year ended December 31, 1999 (after the write-off of the rent that was deferred
for 1999).
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 1999, the SEC staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin
("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition", which provides guidance on the
recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in financial statements.
SAB No. 101 prohibits contingent revenue from being accrued until the thresholds
upon which it is based have been met. In 1999, percentage rental income was
recognized on an accrual basis. However, SAB No. 101 had no material impact on
the Operating Partnership's financial statements for the year ended December 31,
1999 because all of the thresholds upon which percentage rental income is based
had been met by December 31, 1999. In accordance with SAB No. 101, percentage
rental income will not be recognized in the year 2000 until the thresholds upon
which it is based are met. Management does not believe this change will have a
material impact on its interim or annual financial statements.
39
<PAGE> 41
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table shows the Operating Partnership's financial data as
a percentage of total revenues for the three years ended December 31, 1999,
1998, and 1997 and the variance in dollars between the years ended December 31,
1999 and 1998 and the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997. See Note 4.
Segment Reporting included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data for financial information about investment segments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FINANCIAL DATA AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL TOTAL VARIANCE IN DOLLARS BETWEEN
REVENUES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------- --------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1999 AND 1998 1998 AND 1997
--------- ------- ------- -------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES
Office and retail properties 82.3 % 80.6 % 81.2 % $ 51.5 $ 199.7
Hotel properties 8.8 7.7 8.3 11.9 16.0
Behavioral healthcare properties 5.5 7.9 6.7 (14.2) 25.5
Interest and other income 3.4 3.8 3.8 (1.2) 9.7
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL REVENUES 100.0 100.0 100.0 48.0 250.9
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
EXPENSES
Operating expenses 34.4 34.8 35.5 14.1 84.1
Corporate general and administrative 2.2 2.3 2.9 -- 3.4
Interest expense 25.7 21.8 19.3 39.8 65.8
Amortization of deferred financing costs 1.4 0.9 0.8 3.8 3.0
Depreciation and amortization 17.6 16.9 16.6 13.6 43.7
Settlement of merger dispute 2.0 -- -- 15.0 --
Carrying value in excess of market value of
asset held for sale 2.3 -- -- 16.8 --
Impairment and other charges related to
the behavioral healthcare assets 21.7 -- -- 162.0 --
Write-off of costs associated with
unsuccessful acquisitions -- 2.7 -- (18.4) 18.4
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL EXPENSES 107.3 79.4 75.1 246.7 218.4
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) (7.3) 20.6 24.9 (198.7) 32.5
OTHER INCOME
Equity in net income of unconsolidated Companies:
Office and retail properties 0.7 0.6 0.1 1.1 3.6
Temperature-controlled logistics properties 2.0 0.1 0.3 14.5 (0.7)
Residential development properties 5.7 4.8 4.2 9.4 14.7
Other 0.7 0.1 0.7 4.0 (2.0)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
TOTAL OTHER INCOME 9.1 5.6 5.3 29.0 15.6
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS 1.8 26.2 30.2 (169.7) 48.1
Minority interests (0.1) (0.2) (0.3) 0.4 (0.1)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
NET INCOME 1.7 26.0 29.9 (169.3) 48.0
Preferred unit distributions (1.8) (1.7) -- (1.8) (11.7)
Return on share repurchase agreement (0.1) -- -- (0.6) --
Forward share purchase
agreement return (0.6) (0.4) -- (1.0) (3.3)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO
PARTNERS (0.8)% 23.9 % 29.9 % $(172.7) $ 33.0
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE> 42
COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998
REVENUES
Total revenues increased $48.0 million, or 6.9%, to $746.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $698.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
The increase in Office and Retail Property revenues of $51.5 million,
or 9.1%, compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, is attributable to:
o the acquisition of nine Office Properties in 1998, which
contributed revenues for a full year in 1999, as compared with
a partial year in 1998, resulting in $17.1 million in
incremental revenues;
o increased revenues of $27.8 million from the 80 Office and
Retail Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1998, primarily
as a result of rental rate increases at these Properties; and
o increased revenues of $6.6 million as a result of the receipt
of lease termination fees during 1999.
The increase in Hotel Property revenues of $11.9 million, or 22.3%,
compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, is attributable to:
o the acquisition of one golf course affiliated with one of the
Hotel Properties during 1998, which contributed to revenues
for a full year in 1999, as compared with a partial year in
1998, resulting in $1.7 million of incremental revenues;
o the reclassification of the Renaissance Houston Hotel from the
Office Property segment to the Hotel Property segment as a
result of the restructuring of its lease on July 1, 1999,
which contributed $2.8 million of incremental revenues under
the new lease;
o increased revenues of $1.3 million from the re-leasing of the
Omni Austin Hotel to HCD Austin Corporation as of January 1,
1999; and
o increased revenues of $6.1 million from the eight Hotel
Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1998, as a result of
an increase in base rents of $4.8 million because of lease
amendments entered into in connection with contributions made
by the Operating Partnership for capital improvements at some
of the Hotel Properties, and an increase in percentage rent of
$1.3 million.
The decrease in Behavioral Healthcare Property revenue of $14.2
million, or 25.7%, is attributable to the reflection of rent from CBHS on a cash
basis beginning in the third quarter of 1999, and also is attributable to the
deferral of the November and December 1999 rent payments from CBHS.
EXPENSES
Total expenses increased $246.7 million, or 44.5%, to $801.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $554.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998.
The increase in rental property operating expenses of $14.1 million, or
5.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, is attributable to:
o the acquisition of nine Office Properties during 1998, which
incurred expenses during the full year of 1999, as compared to
only a portion of the year of 1998, resulting in $7.1 million
of incremental expenses; and
o increased expenses of $7.0 million from the 80 Office and
Retail Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1998, primarily
as a result of an increase in real estate taxes.
41
<PAGE> 43
The increase in interest expense of $39.8 million, or 26.1%, compared
to the year ended December 31, 1998, is primarily attributable to:
o $0.9 million of incremental interest payable under the
Metropolitan Life Notes III and IV, which were assumed in
connection with the acquisition of the Datran Center Office
Property in May 1998;
o $5.9 million of incremental interest due to the promissory
note secured by the Houston Center Office Property complex,
contributing approximately eight months of interest in 1999
compared with only three months of interest in 1998. This
promissory note was issued in conjunction with the termination
of the equity swap agreement with Merrill Lynch International
on September 30, 1998;
o $4.9 million of incremental interest payable due to the
refinancing of the Houston Center Office Property complex in
September 1999;
o $20.4 million of incremental interest payable due to draws
under the Credit Facility and under the term loans with
BankBoston N.A. (average balance outstanding on the Credit
Facility and under the term loans for the year ended December
31, 1999 and 1998 was $1,043.3 million and $745.0 million,
respectively); and
o $5.7 million of incremental interest payable due to the
refinancing of the Greenway Plaza Office Property complex in
June 1999 with a $280 million secured, fixed-rate note which
generated $165.0 million in net proceeds which were primarily
used to settle the Forward Share Purchase Agreement with UBS.
All of these financing arrangements were used to fund investments,
obligations associated with investments, and to provide working capital.
The increase in amortization of deferred financing costs of $3.8
million, or 58.5%, compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, is primarily
attributable to the incremental amortization of financing costs associated with
new debt obtained during 1998 and 1999.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $13.6 million,
or 11.5%, compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, is primarily
attributable to the acquisition during 1998 of nine Office Properties.
An additional increase in expenses of $175.4 million is attributable
to:
o $162.0 million due to the impairment and other charges related
to the Behavioral Healthcare Properties;
o $16.8 million due to the impairment charge on one of the
Office Property assets held for disposition which represents
the difference between the carrying value of this property and
the subsequent sales price less costs of sale;
o non-recurring costs of $15.0 million associated with the
settlement of litigation relating to the merger agreement
entered into in January 1998 between the Company and Station
Casinos, Inc.; and
o offset by a decrease of $18.4 million due to a non-recurring
write-off in 1998 of costs associated with unsuccessful
acquisitions.
EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED COMPANIES
Equity in net income of unconsolidated companies increased $29.0
million, or 73.8%, to $68.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as
compared to $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998.
The increase is attributable to:
o An increase in equity in net income of the unconsolidated
office and retail properties of $1.1 million, or 26.2%
compared to the year ended December 31, 1998, attributable to
increased revenues at the Woodlands Commercial Properties
Company L.P., due to the sale of the multi-family portfolio in
the third quarter of 1999;
42
<PAGE> 44
o an increase in equity in net income of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations of $14.5
million, or 2900.0%, compared to the year ended December 31,
1998, primarily as a result of the change in ownership. Prior
to March 12, 1999 the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Corporations reflected its equity in the operations of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. Subsequent to
March 12, 1999, the Temperature-Controlled Logistics
Corporations receives rent from AmeriCold Logistics, the
lessee and owner of business operations. In addition, the
Operating Partnership's 1999 equity in net income includes 12
months of income from nine and five Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Properties which were acquired in June 1998 and July
1998, respectively;
o an increase in equity in net income of the Residential
Development Corporations of $9.4 million, or 28.1%, compared
to the year ended December 31, 1998, primarily as a result of
(i) the increased sales activity at CDMC, primarily due to
increased residential lot sales, which resulted in $5.1
million of incremental equity in net income to the Operating
Partnership; (ii) the increased lot sales and average price
per lot sold and the sale of 16 acres at Houston Area
Development, which resulted in $3.0 million of incremental
equity in net income to the Operating Partnership, (iii) an
increase in sales activity at The Woodlands, which resulted in
$1.6 million of incremental equity in net income to the
Operating Partnership, (iv) the increase in average sales
price per lot at Desert Mountain with constant lot absorption
between years, which resulted in $0.6 million of incremental
equity in net income to the Operating Partnership; and (v) a
decrease in lot sales at Mira Vista, which resulted in a
decrease of $0.9 million in equity in net income to the
Operating Partnership; and
o an increase in equity in net income of the other
unconsolidated companies of $4.0 million, or 363.6%, compared
to the year ended December 31, 1998, primarily attributable to
the 7.5% dividend income from the $85 million preferred member
interest in Metropolitan Partners, LLC, which the Operating
Partnership purchased in May 1999.
COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997
REVENUES
Total revenues increased $250.9 million, or 56.1%, to $698.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to $447.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 1997.
The increase in Office and Retail Property revenues of $199.7 million,
or 55.0%, compared to 1997 is attributable to:
o the acquisition of nine Office Properties in 1998, which
resulted in $54.7 million of incremental revenues;
o the acquisition of 26 Office Properties and one Retail
Property in 1997, which contributed revenues for a full year
in 1998, as compared to a partial year in 1997, resulting in
$111.3 million of incremental revenues; and
o increased revenues of $33.7 million from the 59 Office and
Retail Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1997, primarily
as a result of rental rate and occupancy increases at these
Properties.
The increase in Hotel Property revenues of $16.0 million, or 42.9%,
compared to 1997 is primarily attributable to:
o the acquisition of one Hotel Property and a golf course in
1998, which resulted in $3.9 million of incremental revenues;
o the acquisition of two Hotel Properties in 1997, which
contributed revenues for a full year in 1998, as compared to a
partial year in 1997, resulting in $8.9 million of incremental
revenues; and
o increased revenues of $3.3 million from the six Hotel
Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1997, which resulted
primarily from an increase in percentage rent.
The increase in Behavioral Healthcare Property revenues of $25.5
million, or 85.6%, compared to 1997 is primarily attributable to the fact that
the Behavioral Healthcare Properties contributed revenues for a full year in
1998 as compared to approximately six months in 1997.
43
<PAGE> 45
The increase in interest and other income of $9.7 million, or 57.1%,
compared to 1997 is primarily attributable to:
o the sale of marketable securities in 1998; and
o the acquisition of certain notes included in the portfolio
acquired from Carter-Crowley in May of 1997 and the extension
of loans to COI, also in May of 1997, both of which earned
interest for a full year in 1998 as compared to a partial year
in 1997, resulting in incremental interest income on these
notes receivable.
EXPENSES
Total expenses increased $218.4 million, or 65.0%, to $554.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 1998, as compared to $336.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 1997.
The increase in rental property operating expenses of $84.1 million, or
52.9%, compared to 1997 is attributable to:
o the acquisition of nine Office Properties in 1998, which
resulted in $22.1 million of incremental expenses;
o the acquisition of 26 Office Properties and one Retail
Property in 1997, which incurred expenses for a full year in
1998, as compared to a partial year in 1997, resulting in
$52.4 million of incremental expenses; and
o increased expenses of $9.6 million from the 59 Office and
Retail Properties acquired prior to January 1, 1997, primarily
as a result of occupancy increases at these Properties.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense of $43.7 million,
or 58.7%, compared to 1997, is primarily attributable to the acquisitions of
Office, Retail, Hotel and the Behavioral Healthcare Properties in 1997 and 1998.
The increase in interest expense of $65.8 million, or 76.2%, compared
to 1997 is primarily attributable to:
o $21.6 million of interest payable under the Notes due 2002 and
Notes due 2007, which were issued in a private offering in
September 1997;
o $6.1 million of interest payable under the Chase Manhattan
Note, which was assumed in connection with the acquisition of
the Fountain Place Office Property in November 1997;
o $1.2 million of interest payable on the BankBoston Term Note
I, which the Operating Partnership entered into in August
1997;
o $3.0 million of interest payable under the Metropolitan Life
Note II, which was assumed in connection with the acquisition
of the Energy Centre Office Property in December 1997;
o $2.3 million of interest payable under the Metropolitan Life
Notes III and IV, which were assumed in connection with the
acquisition of the Datran Center Office Property in May 1998;
o $3.3 million of interest payable under the promissory note
payable to Merrill Lynch International issued in conjunction
with the termination of the equity swap agreement with Merrill
Lynch International on September 30, 1998; and
o $28.0 million of incremental interest payable due to draws
under the Credit Facility and short-term borrowings with
BankBoston (average balance outstanding for the year ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997 was $728.3 million and $329.8
million, respectively).
All of these financing arrangements were used to fund investments and
working capital.
44
<PAGE> 46
The increase in corporate general and administrative expense of $3.4
million, or 26.4%, compared to 1997 is primarily attributable to the incremental
costs associated with the operations of the Operating Partnership as a result of
property acquisitions.
An additional increase in expenses of $18.4 million is attributable to
a non-recurring write-off of costs associated with unsuccessful acquisitions.
EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED COMPANIES
Equity in net income of unconsolidated companies increased $15.6
million, or 65.8%, to $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998, as
compared to $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 1997.
The increase is primarily attributable to:
o an increase in equity in net income of the Residential
Development Corporations of $14.7 million, or 78.2%,
compared to 1997 which is primarily attributable to the
investments in The Woodlands Land Company, Inc. in July
1997, and Desert Mountain Development Corporation in August
1997, which resulted in $14.2 million of incremental net
income;
o an increase in equity in net income of other unconsolidated
office and retail properties of $3.5 million, or 600.0%,
compared to 1997, which is primarily attributable to the
investment in The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company,
L.P. in July 1997, which resulted in $4.0 million of
incremental net income; partially offset by
o a decrease in equity in net income of the other
unconsolidated companies of $2.0 million, or 64.5%, compared
to 1997, which is primarily attributable to distributions of
$3.1 million received in 1997 from the Operating
Partnership's investment in HBCLP, Inc. (the primary asset
of which is the investment in Hudson Bay Partners, L.P., an
investment partnership in which the Operating Partnership
holds an effective 95% economic interest).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and cash equivalents were $72.1 million and $109.8 million at
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. This 34.3% decrease is attributable to
$164.7 million and $169.2 million used in investing and financing activities,
respectively, partially offset by $296.1 million of cash provided by operating
activities.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
The Operating Partnership's cash used in investing activities of $164.7
million is primarily attributable to:
o $93.9 million for increased investments in unconsolidated
companies primarily as a result of a $75.0 million preferred
interest in Metropolitan Partners, LLC;
o $58.5 million for recurring and non-recurring tenant
improvement and leasing costs for the Office and Retail
Properties;
o $20.3 million for capital expenditures on rental properties,
primarily attributable to non-recoverable building
improvements for the Office and Retail Properties and
replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment for the
Hotel Properties;
o $31.4 million attributable to increased restricted cash and
cash equivalents primarily due to the escrow requirements
related to the refinancings of the Greenway Plaza Office
Property complex and the Houston Center Office Property
complex. Escrow funds of $23.0 million will be released
during the renovation phase of the Renaissance Houston Hotel
over the next 12 to 18 months; and
o $27.8 million for the development of investment properties,
including expansions and renovations at the Hotel
Properties.
45
<PAGE> 47
The cash used in investing activities is partially offset by:
o $53.9 million for decreased notes receivable primarily due
to the sale of certain promissory notes related to the
Dallas Mavericks; and
o $13.7 million for return of investment in the Residential
Development Corporations.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
The Operating Partnership's cash provided by operating activities of
$296.1 million is primarily attributable to:
o $269.7 million from property operations;
o $21.5 million from an increase in accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and other liabilities;
o $30.7 million from a decrease in other assets, primarily due
to the sale of marketable securities; and
o $1.1 million from minority interests.
The cash provided by operating activities is partially offset by:
o $17.2 million from equity in earnings in excess of
distributions received from unconsolidated companies; and
o $9.7 million from an increase in restricted cash and cash
equivalents primarily as a result of increased property tax
escrow amounts related to 1999 debt refinancings.
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The Operating Partnership's use of cash for financing activities of
$169.2 million is attributable to:
o distributions paid to common shareholders and unitholders of
$299.8 million;
o distributions paid to preferred unitholders of $13.5
million;
o settlement of the Forward Share Purchase Agreement with UBS
for $149.4 million;
o debt financing costs of $16.7 million primarily related to
the refinancing of the Greenway Plaza Office Property
complex, the Houston Center Office Property complex and the
BankBoston Term Note II;
o net payments under the Credit Facility of $150.0 million;
and
o capital distributions to a joint venture partner of $3.2
million.
The use of cash for financing activities is partially offset by:
o net proceeds under short-term and long-term facilities of
$430.8 million primarily due to net proceeds from the
refinancing of the Greenway Plaza Office Property complex of
$165.0 million; net proceeds from the refinancing of the
BankBoston Term Note I of $60.0 million; net proceeds from
the refinancing of the BankBoston Term Note II of $200.0
million; net proceeds of $15.0 million from the refinancing
of the Houston Center Office Property complex; and net
payments of $7.1 million from the refinancing of the Datran
Center Office Property; and
o capital contributions from the Company due to proceeds from
the exercise of common share options of $32.6 million.
CBHS
In 1999, the Operating Partnership experienced a decrease in liquidity
as a result of its investment in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties. The
Behavioral Healthcare Properties were leased to CBHS and its subsidiaries under
a triple-net lease. CBHS is a Delaware limited liability company which was
formed to operate the behavioral healthcare business located at the Behavioral
Healthcare Properties and is owned 10% by a subsidiary of Magellan and 90% by
COI and an affiliate of COI. CBHS's business has been negatively affected by
many factors, including adverse industry conditions. During 1999, CBHS failed to
perform in accordance with its operating budget. On February 16, 2000, CBHS and
all of its subsidiaries that are subject to the master lease with the Operating
Partnership filed voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. See "Strategic Plan Update -
CBHS" above for a complete description of the current status of CBHS, the
voluntary filing of Chapter 11 bankruptcy
46
<PAGE> 48
petitions by CBHS and its subsidiaries, and the Operating Partnership's
investment in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
SHELF REGISTRATION STATEMENT
On October 29, 1997, the Company filed a shelf registration statement
(the "Shelf Registration Statement") with the SEC relating to the future
offering of up to an aggregate of $1.5 billion of common shares, preferred
shares and warrants exercisable for common shares. Management believes the Shelf
Registration Statement will provide the Company with more efficient and
immediate access to capital markets when considered appropriate. As of December
31, 1999, approximately $782.7 million was available under the Shelf
Registration Statement for the issuance of securities. In connection with the
issuances of securities pursuant to the Shelf Registration Statement, the
Company contributes the net proceeds of these issuances to the Operating
Partnership for its use in exchange for an increase in its limited partner
interest in the Operating Partnership.
FORWARD SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
On June 30, 1999, the Company settled the Forward Share Purchase
Agreement with UBS. As settlement of the Forward Share Purchase Agreement, the
Company made a cash payment of approximately $149.0 million to UBS in exchange
for the return by UBS to the Company of 7,299,760 common shares. The payment was
made with proceeds generated from the refinancing of the Greenway Plaza Office
Property complex. The return of common shares to the Company in settlement of
the Forward Share Purchase Agreement resulted in a decrease in the Company's
limited partner interest, which resulted in an increase of net income per unit
and net book value per unit.
The number of common shares returned to the Company is equal to the
4,700,000 common shares originally issued to UBS plus 2,599,760 common shares
subsequently issued by the Company, because of a decline in its stock price. In
connection with the issuance of additional common shares, the Company received
additional limited partner interest, which resulted in a reduction of the
Operating Partnership's net income per unit and net book value per unit. The
additional shares were issued as collateral for the Company's obligation to
purchase 4,700,000 common shares from UBS by August 12, 1999. The settlement
price was calculated based on the gross proceeds the Operating Partnership
received from the original issuance of 4,700,000 common shares to UBS, plus a
forward accretion component equal to 90-day LIBOR plus 75 basis points, minus an
adjustment for the Company's distributions paid to UBS. The forward accretion
component represented a guaranteed rate of return to UBS.
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On November 5, 1999, the Company's Board of Trust Managers authorized
the repurchase of a portion of its outstanding common shares from time to time
in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in an amount
not to exceed $500.0 million. The proposed repurchases will be subject to
prevailing market conditions and other considerations. The repurchase of common
shares by the Company would decrease the Company's limited partner interest,
which would result in an increase of net income per unit and net book value per
unit. The Company expects the share repurchase program to be funded through a
combination of asset sales and financing arrangements, which, in some cases, may
be secured by the repurchased shares. The amount of shares that the Company
actually will purchase will be determined from time to time, in its reasonable
judgement, based on market conditions and the availability of funds, among other
factors. There can be no assurance that any number of shares actually will be
purchased within any particular time period.
SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
On November 19, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with UBS to
repurchase a portion of its common shares from UBS. As of December 31, 1999, the
Company was obligated to repurchase 4,789,580 common shares, or approximately
$84.1 million of the Company's common shares. The agreement was amended on
January 4, 2000, increasing the number of common shares the Company was
obligated to repurchase from UBS by January 4, 2001 to approximately 5,800,000
common shares, or approximately $102.0 million of the Company's common shares
(as amended, the "Share Repurchase Agreement"). The price the Company will pay
for the common shares (the "Settlement Price") will be calculated based on the
average cost of the common shares purchased by UBS in connection with the Share
Repurchase Agreement plus a return to UBS of 30-day LIBOR plus 250 basis points,
minus an adjustment for the Company's distributions during the term of the Share
Repurchase Agreement. The guaranteed rate of return to UBS under the agreement
is equal to 30-day LIBOR plus 250 basis points.
47
<PAGE> 49
The Company may settle the Share Repurchase Agreement in cash or common
shares. The Company currently intends to settle the Share Repurchase Agreement
to UBS in cash, by purchasing and retiring the shares with proceeds from Office
Property joint ventures and financing arrangements. If the Company fulfills its
settlement obligations in cash, the Operating Partnership will repurchase a
portion of the Company's limited partner interest for an amount approximately
equal to the cash required to settle the Company's obligations under the Share
Repurchase Agreement. This will decrease the Operating Partnership's liquidity
and result in an increase in the Operating Partnership's net income per unit and
net book value per unit. The Company, however, will continue to evaluate its
sources of capital and the potential uses of its capital until the time that
settlement is required under the Share Repurchase Agreement or until such
earlier time as it determines to settle the Share Repurchase Agreement.
In the event that the Company elects to fulfill the Share Repurchase
Agreement in common shares, UBS will sell the common shares on behalf of the
Company on the open market. If, as a result of a decrease in the market price of
the common shares, the number of common shares required to be sold to achieve
the Settlement Price exceeds the number of common shares purchased by UBS in
connection with the agreement, the Company will deliver additional cash or
common shares to UBS. The issuance of additional common shares would increase
the Company's limited partner interest, and result in a decrease in the
Operating Partnership's net income per unit and net book value per unit. If the
Company elects to fulfill the Share Repurchase Agreement in common shares, and
the market price of the common shares is greater than the Settlement Price, UBS
will return a portion of the common shares that it purchased in the open market
to the Company. If UBS returns common shares to the Company, the Operating
Partnership will repurchase a portion of the Company's limited partner interest
in the Operating Partnership, which will result in an increase in net income per
unit and net book value per unit.
If the common share price on the NYSE falls below the Settlement Price
calculated approximately every two weeks, the Company is required to remit cash
collateral to UBS equal to the product of the number of common shares purchased
by UBS and 115% of the difference between the Settlement Price and the closing
price of the common shares as reported on the NYSE. If the Company elects to
settle the Share Repurchase Agreement in cash, any cash collateral held by UBS
will be used to "pay-down" the Settlement Price. If the Company elects to settle
the Share Repurchase Agreement in common shares, UBS will release all claims to
any cash collateral they hold at that time. As of December 31, 1999, no cash
collateral was due to UBS. On February 18, 2000, the Company posted cash
collateral of $8.7 million to UBS, as a result of a decline in the common share
price.
According to the terms of the Share Repurchase Agreement, had the
agreement been settled, and the average cost of common shares to UBS on December
31, 1999 of approximately $17.55 been used, the Company would have had to
repurchase the 4,789,580 common shares from UBS for approximately $84.1 million.
In that event, the Operating Partnership's liquidity would have decreased and
the Operating Partnership's net income - diluted per unit would have been
approximately $(0.09) for the year ended December 31, 1999 and the net book
value per unit outstanding at December 31, 1999 would have been approximately
$29.95.
STATION CASINOS, INC. ("STATION")
On April 14, 1999, the Company and Station entered into a settlement
agreement for the mutual settlement and release of all claims between the
Company and Station arising out of the agreement and plan of merger between the
Company and Station, which the Company terminated in August 1998. As part of the
settlement agreement, the Company paid $15.0 million to Station on April 22,
1999.
METROPOLITAN
On December 8, 1998, Tower Realty Trust ("Tower"), Reckson Associates
Realty Corporation ("Reckson"), and Metropolitan Partners, LLC ("Metropolitan")
entered into a revised agreement and plan of merger that superseded the merger
agreement to which the Operating Partnership was a party. Under the revised
agreement, Metropolitan agreed to acquire Tower for a combination of cash and
Reckson exchangeable Class B common shares. The Operating Partnership, Reckson
and Metropolitan agreed that the Operating Partnership's investment in
Metropolitan would be an $85.0 million preferred member interest in
Metropolitan. In connection with the revised agreement, the Operating
Partnership contributed $10.0 million of the $85.0 million required capital
contribution to Metropolitan in December 1998 and contributed the remaining
$75.0 million to Metropolitan upon satisfaction of all of the conditions to the
funding on May 19, 1999. The Operating Partnership's $85.0 million preferred
member interest in Metropolitan at December 31, 1999 would equate to an
approximate 20% equity interest.
The investment has a cash flow preference of 7.5% for a two-year period
and may be redeemed by Metropolitan within the two-year period for $85.0
million, plus an amount sufficient to provide a 9.5% internal rate of return to
the Operating Partnership. If Metropolitan does not redeem the preferred
interest upon expiration of the two-year period, the Operating Partnership may
convert the interest either into (i) a common equity interest in Metropolitan or
(ii) shares of common stock of Reckson at a conversion price of $24.61.
48
<PAGE> 50
CREDIT FACILITY
At December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's borrowing capacity
under the Credit Facility was limited to $560.0 million, of which $510.0 million
was outstanding. The interest rate on advances under the Credit Facility was the
Eurodollar rate plus 137 basis points. As of December 31, 1999, the weighted
average interest rate was 7.65%. The Credit Facility was unsecured and was
scheduled to expire in June 2000. The Credit Facility required the Operating
Partnership to maintain compliance with a number of customary financial and
other covenants on an ongoing basis, including leverage ratios based on book
value and debt service coverage ratios, limitations on additional secured and
total indebtedness and distributions, limitations on additional investments and
the incurrence of additional liens, restrictions on real estate development
activity and a minimum net worth requirement. The Operating Partnership was in
compliance with the financial covenants related to the Credit Facility for the
December 31, 1999 reporting period. During the first quarter of 2000, the Credit
Facility was repaid and retired primarily with the proceeds of the New Facility
described below.
NEW FACILITY
On February 4, 2000, the Operating Partnership repaid and retired the
Credit Facility and the BankBoston Term Note I primarily with the proceeds of
the New Facility, a new $850.0 million secured, variable-rate facility fully
underwritten and funded by UBS. The New Facility is comprised of three tranches:
a three-year $300.0 million revolving line of credit (the "UBS Line of Credit"),
a $275.0 million three-year term loan ("UBS Term Loan I") and a $275.0 million
four-year term loan ("UBS Term Loan II"). Borrowings under the UBS Line of
Credit, the UBS Term Loan I and the UBS Term Loan II at March 24, 2000 were
approximately $258.5 million, $257.2 million and $257.2 million, respectively.
The UBS Line of Credit and the UBS Term Loan I bear interest at LIBOR plus 250
basis points. The UBS Term Loan II bears interest at LIBOR plus 275 basis
points. The Operating Partnership also entered into a cash flow hedge agreement
related to a portion of the New Facility in a separate transaction subsequent to
December 31, 1999, which is intended to mitigate its exposure to variable rate
debt as more fully described in "Interest Rate Hedging Transactions" below. The
New Facility is secured by 41 Office Properties and four Hotel Properties.
INTEREST RATE HEDGING TRANSACTIONS
The Operating Partnership does not use derivative financial instruments
for trading purposes, but utilizes them to manage exposure to variable rate
debt. The Operating Partnership accounts for its derivative instruments under
SFAS 133, which was adopted in the third quarter of 1999. On September 1, 1999,
the Operating Partnership entered into a four-year cash flow hedge agreement
with Salomon Brothers Holding Company, Inc. ("Salomon"), relating to the
BankBoston Term Note II, for a notional amount of $200.0 million. The underlying
note, which was originally issued at a floating interest rate of 30-day LIBOR
plus 325 basis points was effectively converted to a fixed weighted average
interest rate of 9.43% through maturity. Effective February 1, 2000, the
Operating Partnership renegotiated certain terms and covenants under the
BankBoston Term Note II. At such time, the interest rate on the facility
increased to 30-day LIBOR plus 400 basis points, and consequently increased the
effective fixed weighted average interest rate to 10.18% through maturity. As of
December 31, 1999, the cash flow hedge agreement with Salomon resulted in
approximately $0.3 million of additional interest expense.
On February 4, 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into a
three-year cash flow hedge agreement with Fleet Boston Financial, relating to a
portion of the New Facility, for a notional amount of $200.0 million. As a
result, $200.0 million of the amount due under the note, which was originally
issued at a floating interest rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points, was
effectively converted to a fixed weighted average interest rate of 9.61% through
maturity.
ASSET JOINT VENTURES
The Operating Partnership has entered into agreements with Chadwick
Saylor & Co., Inc. and Warburg Dillon Read to provide investment advisory
services to the Operating Partnership in the successful execution of the
Operating Partnership's joint-venture strategy. The Operating Partnership
intends to hold a minority interest in these assets and will continue to lease
and manage these Properties.
49
<PAGE> 51
LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's short-term
liquidity requirements consisted of secured any unsecured debt maturities, its
indirect obligations under the Share Repurchase Agreement with UBS and amounts
payable in connection with the expansion or renovation of two Hotel Properties.
The Operating Partnership had approximately $515.9 million of secured and
unsecured debt that was scheduled to expire during 2000, consisting primarily of
$510.0 million due under the Credit Facility with BankBoston, which was
scheduled to expire in June 2000. In addition, the Operating Partnership, at
that time, had approximately $445.0 million of secured debt that was scheduled
to expire in 2001, consisting primarily of $320.0 million due under the
BankBoston Term Note I. Effective January 31, 2000, the Operating Partnership
entered into the New Facility. The Operating Partnership used the proceeds of
the New Facility to retire the Credit Facility and BankBoston Term Note I, which
made up 86% of the Operating Partnership's maturing debt in 2000 and 2001.
The Company's Share Repurchase Agreement with UBS, as described in
"Share Repurchase Agreement" above, expires on January 4, 2001, at which time
the Company is required to settle in cash or common shares. The Company
currently intends to fulfill the Share Repurchase Agreement to UBS in cash, by
purchasing and retiring the shares with proceeds from Office Property joint
ventures and financing arrangements. If the Company fulfills its settlement
obligations in cash, the Operating Partnership will repurchase a portion of the
Company's limited partnership interest for an amount approximately equal to the
cash required to settle the Company's obligations under the Share Repurchase
Agreement. This will decrease the Operating Partnership's liquidity and will
result in an increase in the Operating Partnership's net income per unit and net
book value per unit. The Company, however, will continue to evaluate its sources
of capital and the potential uses of its capital until the time that settlement
is required under the Share Repurchase Agreement or until such earlier time as
it determines to settle the Share Repurchase Agreement.
The Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa, located north of San Francisco,
California, is scheduled to complete its estimated $20 million expansion
consisting of 30 additional guest rooms and a 30,000 square foot full-service
spa in April of 2000. The 389 guest room Renaissance Houston Hotel, located in
the center of Greenway Plaza, will undergo substantial renovation including
improvements to all guest rooms, the lobby, corridors and exterior and interior
systems. The estimated $15.0 million renovation project is scheduled to be
completed in October of 2000. Both of these projects will be funded from cash
flows provided by operating activities, additional debt financing or combination
thereof.
The Operating Partnership expects to meet its other short-term
liquidity requirements primarily through cash flow provided by operating
activities. The Operating Partnership believes that cash flow provided by
operating activities will be adequate to fund normal recurring operating
expenses, regular debt service requirements (including debt service relating to
additional and replacement debt), recurring capital expenditures and
distributions to shareholders and unitholders, as well as non-recurring capital
expenditures, such as tenant improvement and leasing costs related to previously
unoccupied space. To the extent that the Operating Partnership's cash flow from
operating activities is not sufficient to finance non-recurring capital
expenditures, the Operating Partnership expects to finance such activities with
available cash or additional debt financing.
The Operating Partnership expects to meet its long-term liquidity
requirements through long-term secured and unsecured borrowings and other debt
and equity financing alternatives. As of December 31, 1999, the Operating
Partnership's long-term liquidity requirements consisted primarily of maturities
under the Operating Partnership's fixed and variable-rate debt.
Debt and equity financing alternatives currently available to the
Operating Partnership to satisfy its liquidity requirements and commitments for
material capital expenditures include:
o Additional proceeds from the refinancing of existing secured
and unsecured debt;
o Additional debt secured by existing unencumbered properties,
investment properties, or by investment property
acquisitions or developments;
o Issuances of Operating Partnership units; and
o Joint venture arrangements.
50
<PAGE> 52
DEBT FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
The significant terms of the Operating Partnership's primary debt
financing arrangements existing as of December 31, 1999 are shown below (dollars
in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST BALANCE
RATE AT OUTSTANDING AT
MAXIMUM DECEMBER 31, EXPIRATION DECEMBER 31,
DESCRIPTION BORROWINGS 1999 DATE 1999
- ------------------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SECURED FIXED RATE DEBT:
AEGON Note (1) $ 278,392 7.53% July 2009 $ 278,392
LaSalle Note I (2) 239,000 7.83 August 2027 239,000
JP Morgan Mortgage Note (3) 200,000 8.31 October 2016 200,000
LaSalle Note II (4) 161,000 7.79 March 2028 161,000
CIGNA Note (5) 63,500 7.47 December 2002 63,500
Metropolitan Life Note I (6)(7) 11,388 8.88 September 2001 11,388
Metropolitan Life Note II (8) 43,623 6.93 December 2002 43,623
Metropolitan Life Note V (9) 39,700 8.49 December 2005 39,700
Northwestern Life Note (10) 26,000 7.65 January 2003 26,000
Nomura Funding VI Note (7)(11) 8,480 10.07 July 2020 8,480
Rigney Promissory Note (12) 723 8.50 November 2012 723
-------------- -------------- --------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average $ 1,071,806 7.83% $ 1,071,806
-------------- -------------- --------------
SECURED VARIABLE RATE DEBT (13):
BankBoston Term Note I (14)(18) $ 320,000 9.38% October 2001 $ 320,000
BankBoston Term Note II (15) 200,000 9.38 August 2003 200,000
SFT Whole Loans, Inc. Note (16) 97,123 7.36 September 2001 97,123
-------------- -------------- --------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average $ 617,123 9.06% $ 617,123
-------------- -------------- --------------
UNSECURED FIXED RATE DEBT:
Notes due 2007 (17) $ 250,000 7.50% September 2007 $ 250,000
Notes due 2002 (17) 150,000 7.00 September 2002 150,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Subtotal/Weighted Average $ 400,000 7.31% $ 400,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
UNSECURED VARIABLE RATE DEBT:
Credit Facility (18) $ 560,000 7.65% June 2000 $ 510,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
TOTAL/WEIGHTED AVERAGE $ 2,648,929 8.01% $ 2,598,929
============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) The outstanding principal balance at maturity of this note will be
approximately $223 million.
(2) The note has a seven-year period during which only interest is payable
(through August 2002), followed by principal amortization based on a
25-year amortization schedule through maturity. At the end of 12 years
(August 2007), the interest rate increases, and the Operating Partnership
is required to remit, in addition to the monthly debt service payment,
excess property cash flow, to be applied first against principal until the
note is paid in full and thereafter, against accrued excess interest. It is
the Operating Partnership's intention to repay the note in full at such
time (August 2007) by making a final payment of approximately $220 million.
LaSalle Note I is secured by Properties owned by Funding I (See Note 1.
Organization and Basis of Presentation of Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data). The note agreement restricts Funding I from engaging
in certain activities, including incurring liens on the Properties securing
the note, pledging the Properties securing the note, incurring certain
other indebtedness canceling a material claim or debt owed to it, entering
into certain transactions distributing funds derived from operation of the
Properties securing the note (except as specifically permitted in the note
agreement), or creating easements with respect to the Properties securing
the note.
(3) On September 14, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the $184,299
Salomon Brothers Realty Corp. Note with this note. The additional proceeds
of $15,701 were used to pay indebtedness outstanding under the BankBoston
Credit Facility. The refinancing did not include the Four Seasons Hotel -
Houston that had served as partial collateral for the Salomon Brothers
Realty Corp. Note. At the end of seven year (October 2006), the loan
reprices based on current interest rates at this time. It is the Operating
Partnership's intention to repay the note in full at such time (October
2006) by making a final payment of approximately $179.0 million.
(4) The note has a seven-year period during which only interest is payable
(through March 2003), followed by principal amortization based on a 25-year
amortization schedule through maturity. At the end of 10 years (March
2006), the interest rate increases, and the Operating Partnership is
required to remit, in addition to the monthly debt service payment, excess
property cash flow, as defined, to be applied first against principal until
the note is paid in full and thereafter, against accrued excess interest,
as defined. It is the Operating Partnership's intention to repay the note
in full at such time (March 2006) by making a final payment of
approximately $154.0 million. LaSalle Note II is secured by Properties
owned by Funding II (See Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation of
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). The note agreement
restricts Funding II from engaging in certain activities, including
incurring liens on the Properties securing the note, pledging the
Properties securing the note, incurring certain other indebtedness
canceling a material claim or debt owed to it, entering into certain
affiliate transactions, distributing funds derived from operation of the
Properties securing the note (except as specifically permitted in the note
agreement), or creating easements with respect to the Properties securing
the note.
51
<PAGE> 53
(5) The note requires payments of interest only during its term. The CIGNA Note
is secured by the MCI Tower and Denver Marriott City Center Hotel Property.
The note agreement has no negative covenants. The deed of trust requires
the Operating Partnership to maintain the Properties that secure the note,
and requires approval to grant liens, transfer the Properties, or issue new
leases.
(6) The note requires monthly payments of principal and interest based on
20-year amortization schedule through maturity, at which time the
outstanding principal balance is due and payable. The Metropolitan Note I
is secured by five of The Woodlands Office Properties which are under
contract for sale. The note agreement has no negative covenants.
(7) The note was assumed in connection with an acquisition and was not
subsequently retired by the Operating Partnership because of prepayment
penalties.
(8) The note requires monthly payments of principal and interest based on a
25-year amortization schedule through maturity, at which time the
outstanding principal balance is due and payable. The Metropolitan Life
Note II is secured by the Energy Centre Office Property. The note agreement
requires the Operating Partnership to maintain compliance with a number of
customary covenants, including maintaining the Property that secures the
note and not creating any lien with respect to or otherwise encumbering
such Property. This note was transferred to the new owner of Energy Centre
upon its sale on January 18, 2000.
(9) On December 1, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the Metropolitan
Life Note III with the Metropolitan Life Note V. The original note of $40
million had a fixed interest rate of 7.74% and was scheduled to mature on
December 1, 1999. The Metropolitan Life Note V requires monthly principal
and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule through
maturity, at which time the outstanding principal balance is due and
payable. The Metropolitan Note is secured by the Datran Center Office
Property.
(10) The note requires payments of interest only during its term. The
Northwestern Life Note is secured by the 301 Congress Avenue Office
Property. The note agreement requires the Operating Partnership to maintain
compliance with a number of customary covenants, including maintaining the
Property that secures the note and not creating any lien with respect to or
otherwise encumbering such Property.
(11) Under the terms of the note, principal and interest are payable based on a
25-year amortization schedule. Beginning in July 1998, the Operating
Partnership obtained the right to defease the note by purchasing Treasury
obligations in an amount sufficient to pay the note without penalty. The
Nomura Funding VI Note is secured by Canyon Ranch-Lenox, the Property owned
by Funding VI (see Note 1. Organization and Basis of Presentation of Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data). In July of 2010, the
interest rate due under the note will change to a 10-year Treasury yield
plus 500 basis points or, if the Operating Partnership so elects, it may
repay the note without penalty. The note agreement requires Funding VI to
maintain compliance with a number of customary covenants, including a debt
service coverage ratio for the Property that secures the note, a
restriction on the ability to transfer or encumber the Property that
secures the note, and covenants related to maintaining its single purpose
nature, including restrictions on ownership by Funding VI of assets other
than the Property that secures the note, restrictions on the ability to
incur indebtedness and make loans, and restrictions on operations.
(12) The note requires quarterly payments of principal and interest based on a
15-year amortization schedule through maturity, at which time the
outstanding principal balance is due and payable. The Rigney Promissory
Note is secured by a parcel of land owned by the Operating Partnership and
located across from an Office Property. The note agreement has no negative
covenants.
(13) For the method of calculation of the interest rate for the Operating
Partnership's variable-rate debt (other than the Credit Facility), see Note
7. Notes Payable and Borrowings under Credit Facility of Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
(14) This note requires payments of interest only during its term. The note
bears interest at the Operating Partnership's election of Base Rate plus
100 basis points or Eurodollar plus 325 basis points. On February 10, 1999,
this loan was increased to $320 million based on the inclusion of The
Addison and Reverchon Plaza Office Properties in the pool of Properties
securing this note. The note is secured by a first lien on the 3333 Lee
Parkway, Frost Bank Plaza, Four Westlake, Central Park Plaza, Bank One
Tower, Washington Harbour and Greenway I and IA Office Properties in
addition to the two Properties listed above. The term loan requires the
Operating Partnership to maintain compliance with a number of customary
financial and other covenants on an ongoing basis, including leverage
ratios based on book value and debt service coverage ratios, limitations on
additional secured and total indebtedness and distributions, limitations on
additional investments and the incurrence of additional liens, restrictions
on real estate development activity and a minimum net worth requirement.
52
<PAGE> 54
(15) The Operating Partnership entered into the BankBoston Term Note II on
September 14, 1999. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 325 basis points.
This loan is secured by partnership interests in two pools of
underleveraged assets. The term loan requires the Operating Partnership to
maintain compliance with a number of customary financial and other
covenants on an ongoing basis, including leverage ratios based on book
value and debt service coverage ratios, limitations on additional secured
and total indebtedness and distributions, limitations on additional
investments and the incurrence of additional liens, restrictions on real
estate development activity and a minimum net worth requirement. The
proceeds were used to repay the $150 million BankBoston Bridge Loan, and to
repay $50 million of outstanding indebtedness under the BankBoston Credit
Facility. On February 1, 2000, the Operating Partnership renegotiated
certain terms and covenants under this note. As a result, the interest rate
on the facility increased to 30-day LIBOR plus 400 basis points. The
Operating Partnership entered into a four-year $200 million cash flow hedge
agreement with Salomon in a separate transaction related to the BankBoston
Term Note II. Pursuant to this agreement, the Operating Partnership will
pay Salomon on a quarterly basis a 6.183% fixed interest rate, and Salomon
will pay the Operating Partnership a floating 90-day LIBOR rate based on
the same quarterly reset dates.
(16) The note bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 175 basis points and
requires payment of interest only during its term. The SFT Note is secured
by Fountain Place. The note agreement requires that the Operating
Partnership maintain compliance with customary covenants including
maintaining the Property that secures the note.
(17) The notes are unsecured and require payments of interest only during their
terms. The indenture requires the Operating Partnership to maintain
compliance with a number of customary financial and other covenants on an
ongoing basis, including leverage ratios and debt service coverage ratios,
limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and maintaining
the Operating Partnership's Properties. The notes were issued in an
offering registered with the SEC.
(18) At December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's borrowing capacity under
the Credit Facility was limited to $560.0 million, of which $510.0 million
was outstanding. The interest rate on advances under the Credit Facility
was the Eurodollar rate plus 137 basis points. The Credit Facility required
the Operating Partnership to maintain compliance with a number of customary
financial and other covenants on an ongoing basis, including leverage
ratios based on book value and debt service coverage ratios, limitations on
additional secured and total indebtedness and distributions, limitations on
additional investments and the incurrence of additional liens, restrictions
on real estate development activity and a minimum net worth requirement.
The Operating Partnership was in compliance with the financial covenants
related to the Credit Facility for the December 31, 1999 reporting period.
On February 4, 2000, the Credit Facility and the BankBoston Term Note I
were repaid and retired primarily with the proceeds from the New Facility,
a new $850.0 million secured, variable-rate facility from UBS. See
"Liquidity and Capital Resources - New Facility" for a description of the
New Facility.
53
<PAGE> 55
Below are the aggregate principal amounts due as of December 31, 1999
under the Credit Facility and other indebtedness of the Operating Partnership by
year. Scheduled principal installments and amounts due at maturity are included.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECURED UNSECURED TOTAL
---------- --------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $ 5,913 $510,000 $ 515,913
2001 444,975 -- 444,975
2002 105,560 150,000 255,560
2003 315,515 -- 315,515
2004 53,129 -- 53,129
Thereafter 763,837 250,000 1,013,837
---------- -------- ----------
$1,688,929 $910,000 $2,598,929
========== ======== ==========
</TABLE>
See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - New Facility" above for a
description of the repayment and retiring of the Credit Facility subsequent to
December 31, 1999, primarily with the proceeds of the New Facility.
The Operating Partnership's policy with regard to the incurrence and
maintenance of debt is based on a review and analysis of:
o investment opportunities for which capital is required and the
cost of debt in relation to such investment opportunities;
o the type of debt available (secured or unsecured);
o the effect of additional debt on existing coverage ratios;
o the maturity of the proposed debt in relation to maturities of
existing debt; and
o exposure to variable-rate debt and alternatives such as interest
rate swaps and cash flow hedges to reduce this exposure.
The Operating Partnership's debt service coverage ratio for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 was approximately 2.8 and 3.1, respectively.
Debt service coverage for a particular period is generally calculated as net
income plus depreciation and amortization, plus interest expense, plus
extraordinary or non-recurring losses, minus extraordinary or non-recurring
gains, divided by debt service (including principal and interest payable during
the period of calculation). The debt service coverage ratio the Operating
Partnership is required to maintain as stipulated by the Operating Partnership's
debt arrangements and calculated as described above is 1.5. The Operating
Partnership's New Facility requires a debt service coverage ratio of 2.0.
SIGNIFICANT DEBT REFINANCINGS
On June 30, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the Greenway
Plaza Office Property complex with a $280 million, secured, fixed-rate mortgage
loan, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.53%. The proceeds were primarily
used to repay the $115 million existing note on the complex and to pay
approximately $149 million in settlement of the Forward Share Purchase Agreement
with UBS.
On September 14, 1999, the Operating Partnership obtained a $200
million note from BankBoston ("BankBoston Term Note II") secured by partnership
interests in two pools of assets which also secure the La Salle Notes I and II.
This new loan has a four-year term and a floating interest rate based on 30-day
LIBOR plus 325 basis points. On February 1, 2000, the Operating Partnership
renegotiated certain term and covenants under this note. As a result, the
interest rate on the facility increased to 30-day LIBOR plus 400 basis points.
The proceeds were used to repay the $150 million short-term Bridge Loan with
BankBoston in full and reduce the amount outstanding under the BankBoston Credit
Facility by $50 million. The Operating Partnership has entered into a four-year
$200 million cash flow hedge agreement with Salomon in a separate transaction
related to this financing. Pursuant to this agreement, the Operating Partnership
will pay Salomon a 6.183% fixed interest rate on a quarterly basis, and Salomon
will pay the Operating Partnership a floating 90-day LIBOR rate based on the
same quarterly reset dates.
On September 15, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the $184
million Salomon Brothers Note which secured the Houston Center mixed-use Office
Property complex, with a $200 million, secured, fixed-rate mortgage loan
54
<PAGE> 56
through J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. The replacement loan has a
seven-year term and bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.31%. The Houston Center
mixed-use Office Property secures the replacement loan but the Four Seasons
Hotel - Houston, which served as partial collateral for the original loan, does
not serve as collateral for the replacement loan. The proceeds of the
replacement loan were primarily used to repay the $184 million Salomon Brothers
Note in full and to reduce the amount outstanding under the BankBoston Credit
Facility by approximately $15 million.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
FFO, based on the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the
NAREIT and as used in this document, means:
o Net Income (Loss) - determined in accordance with GAAP;
o excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and
sales of property;
o excluding adjustments not of a normal or recurring nature;
o plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets;
and
o after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures.
NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance and liquidity
of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically
has not depreciated on the basis determined under GAAP. The Operating
Partnership considers FFO an appropriate measure of performance of an equity
REIT. However, FFO:
o does not represent cash generated from operating activities
determined in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally
reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events that
enter into the determination of net income);
o is not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash
needs; and
o should not be considered as an alternative to net income
determined in accordance with GAAP as an indication of the
Operating Partnership's operating performance, or to cash flow
from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP as a
measure of either liquidity or the Operating Partnership's
ability to make distributions.
The Operating Partnership has historically distributed an amount less
than FFO, primarily due to reserves required for capital expenditures, including
leasing costs. The aggregate cash distributions paid to shareholders and
unitholders for the year ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 were $298.1 and $220.6
million, respectively.
An increase or decrease in FFO does not necessarily result in an
increase or decrease in aggregate distributions because the Company's Board of
Trust Managers is not required to increase distributions on a quarterly basis
unless necessary for the Company to maintain REIT status. However, the Company
must distribute 95% of its REIT taxable income (as defined in the Code).
Therefore, a significant increase in FFO will generally require an increase in
distributions to shareholders and unitholders although not necessarily on a
proportionate basis.
Accordingly, the Operating Partnership believes that to facilitate a
clear understanding of the consolidated historical operating results of the
Operating Partnership, FFO should be considered in conjunction with the
Operating Partnership's net income (loss) and cash flows reported in the
consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements.
However, the Operating Partnership's measure of FFO may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures of other REITs because these REITs (other than the
Company) may apply the definition of FFO in a different manner than the
Operating Partnership.
55
<PAGE> 57
STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS AND UNITS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Net income $ 12,232 $ 181,711
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets 128,403 115,678
Settlement of merger dispute 15,000 --
Gain on behavioral healthcare facility disposition (439) --
Carrying value in excess of market value of
assets held for sale 16,800 --
Impairment and other charges related to the
behavioral healthcare assets 136,435 --
Write-off of costs associated with unsuccessful
acquisitions -- 18,435
Adjustment for investments in real estate mortgages
and equity of unconsolidated companies:
Office and retail properties 6,110 2,530
Temperature-Controlled Logistics properties 22,400 28,115
Residential development properties 31,725 25,379
Other 611 --
Preferred share dividends (13,500) (11,700)
------------- -------------
Funds from operations $ 355,777 $ 360,148
============= =============
Investment Segments:
Office and Retail Segment $ 367,830 $ 325,442
Hospitality Segment 64,079 52,375
Behavioral Healthcare Segment 15,488 55,295
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment 37,439 28,626
Residential Development Segment 74,597 58,892
Corporate general & administrative (16,274) (16,264)
Interest expense (192,033) (152,214)
Preferred unit dividends (13,500) (11,700)
Other(1) 18,151 19,696
------------- -------------
Funds from operations $ 355,777 $ 360,148
============= =============
Basic weighted average units 67,977 66,214
============= =============
Diluted weighted average units(3) 68,946 70,194
============= =============
</TABLE>
- -----------------
(1) Includes interest and other income, net of gain on behavioral healthcare
facility dispostion, less depreciation and amortization of non-real assets
and amortization of deferred financing costs.
(2) See calculations for the amounts presented in the reconciliation following
this table.
The following schedule reconciles the Operating Partnership's basic
weighted average units to the diluted weighted average units presented above:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
(UNITS IN THOUSANDS) 1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Basic weighted average units: 67,977 66,214
Add: Assumed conversion of preferred units -- 1,739
Unit options 837 1,952
Forward Share Purchase Agreement 132 197
Equity Swap Agreement -- 92
---------- ----------
Diluted weighted average units 68,946 70,194
========== ==========
</TABLE>
56
<PAGE> 58
RECONCILIATION OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS TO NET CASH PROVIDED
BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1999 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Funds from operations $ 355,777 $ 360,148
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization of non-real estate assets 2,311 1,631
Settlement of merger dispute (15,000) --
Write-off costs associated with unsuccessful acquisitions -- (18,435)
Other charges related to the behavioral healthcare assets (32,662) --
Gain on behavioral healthcare property disposition 439 --
Amortization of deferred financing costs 10,283 6,486
Minority interest in joint ventures profit and depreciation
and amortization 2,054 2,272
Adjustment for investments in real estate mortgages
and equity of unconsolidated companies (60,846) (56,024)
Change in deferred rent receivable (636) (34,047)
Change in current assets and liabilities 38,010 (6,121)
Equity in earnings in excess of distributions received from
unconsolidated companies (17,202) --
Distributions received in excess of equity in earnings from
unconsolidated companies -- 9,308
Preferred unit distributions 13,500 11,700
Non-cash compensation 118 174
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 296,146 $ 277,092
============ ============
</TABLE>
HISTORICAL RECURRING OFFICE AND RETAIL PROPERTY
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, TENANT IMPROVEMENT AND LEASING COSTS
The following table sets forth annual and per square foot recurring
capital expenditures (excluding those expenditures which are recoverable from
tenants) and tenant improvement and leasing costs for the years ended December
31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, attributable to signed leases, all of which have
commenced or will commence during the next twelve months (i.e., the renewal or
replacement tenant began or will begin to pay rent) for the Office and Retail
Properties consolidated in the Operating Partnership's financial statements
during each of the periods presented. Tenant improvement and leasing costs for
signed leases during a particular period do not necessarily equal the cash paid
for tenant improvement and leasing costs during such period due to timing of
payments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Capital Expenditures (in thousands) $ 6,048 $ 5,107 $ 3,310
Per square foot $ 0.19 $ 0.16 $ 0.15
TENANT IMPROVEMENT AND LEASING COSTS:(1)
Replacement Tenant Square Feet 1,259,660 850,325 584,116
Renewal Tenant Square Feet 1,385,911 923,854 1,001,653
Tenant Improvement Costs (in thousands) $ 14,339 $ 8,552 $ 10,958
Per square foot leased $ 5.42 $ 4.82 $ 6.91
Tenant Leasing Costs (in thousands) $ 7,804 $ 5,358 $ 6,601
Per square foot leased $ 2.95 $ 3.02 $ 4.16
Total (in thousands) $ 22,143 $ 13,910 $ 17,559
Total per square foot $ 8.37 $ 7.84 $ 11.07
Average lease term 4.5 years 5.4 years 6.4 years
Total per square foot per year $ 1.87 $ 1.44 $ 1.73
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) Excludes leasing activity for leases that have less than a one-year term
(i.e., storage and temporary space).
57
<PAGE> 59
Capital expenditures may fluctuate in any given period subject to the
nature, extent and timing of improvements required to be made in the Operating
Partnership's Office and Retail Property portfolio. The Operating Partnership
maintains an active preventive maintenance program in order to minimize required
capital improvements. In addition, certain capital improvement costs are
recoverable from tenants.
Tenant improvement and leasing costs also may fluctuate in any given
year depending upon factors such as the property, the term of the lease, the
type of lease (renewal or replacement tenant), the involvement of external
leasing agents and overall competitive market conditions. Management believes
that future recurring tenant improvements and leasing costs for the Operating
Partnership's existing Office and Retail Properties will approximate on average
for "renewal tenants" $6.00 to $10.00 per square foot, or $1.20 to $2.00 per
square foot per year based on an average five-year lease term, and, on average
for "replacement tenants," $12.00 to $16.00 per square foot, or $2.40 to $3.20
per square foot per year based on an average five-year lease term.
YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE
OVERVIEW
The year 2000 issue related to whether computer systems will properly
recognize date-sensitive information to allow accurate processing of
transactions and data relating to the year 2000 and beyond. In addition, the
year 2000 issue related to whether non-Information Technology ("IT") systems
that depend on embedded computer technology would recognize the year 2000.
Systems that did not properly recognize such information could generate
erroneous information or fail.
In early 1998, the Operating Partnership assigned a group of
individuals with the task of creating a program to identify, understand and
address the myriad issues associated with the year 2000 problem. The group
completed its assessment of the Operating Partnership's year 2000 readiness by
way of a comprehensive review of IT and non-IT systems at the Operating
Partnership's principal executive offices and at the Operating Partnership's
Properties. The group completed its remediation and testing of any systems that
were identified as being date sensitive.
YEAR 2000 DISCLOSURE
The Operating Partnership did not experience any significant
disruptions as a result of the year 2000 issues. The Operating Partnership
dismantled the year 2000 command center and re-deployed the members of the year
2000 project team. However, the Operating Partnership will continue to monitor
all areas of the Operating Partnership for any year 2000 related issues that may
surface, but with the passing of time, the likelihood of an issue is negligible.
The total costs to repair and replace IT and Non-IT systems were $0.75
million, which was below the estimated costs of $1.2 million, and did not have a
material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's financial condition or
results of operations.
Although unlikely, given that the Operating Partnership has not
experienced any year 2000 problems to date, there can be no certainty that any
future unforeseen year 2000 problem will not adversely affect the Operating
Partnership's results of operations, liquidity or financial position or
adversely affect the Operating Partnership's relationships with its customers,
suppliers, vendors or others.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Operating Partnership's and the Company's use of financial
instruments, such as debt instruments and its Share Repurchase Agreement with
UBS, subject the Operating Partnership to market risk which may affect the
Operating Partnership's future earnings and cash flows as well as the fair value
of its assets. Market risk generally refers to the risk of loss from changes in
interest rates and market prices. The Operating Partnership manages its market
risk by attempting to match anticipated inflow of cash from its operating,
investment and financing activities with anticipated outflow of cash to fund
debt payments, distributions to shareholders, investments, capital expenditures
and other cash requirements. The Operating Partnership does not enter into
financial instruments for trading purposes.
58
<PAGE> 60
The following discussion of market risk is based solely on hypothetical
changes in interest rates related to the Operating Partnership's variable-rate
debt and the Company's Share Repurchase Agreement and in the market price of the
Company's common shares as such changes relate to the Share Repurchase
Agreement. This discussion does not purport to take into account all of the
factors that may affect the financial instruments discussed in this section.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Operating Partnership's interest rate risk is most sensitive to
fluctuations in interest rates on its short-term variable-rate debt. The
Operating Partnership had total outstanding debt of approximately $2.6 billion
at December 31, 1999, of which approximately $0.9 billion, or 34.6%, was
variable-rate unhedged debt. The weighted average interest rate on such
variable-rate debt was 8.22% as of December 31, 1999. A 10% (82.2 basis point)
increase in the weighted average interest rate on such variable-rate debt would
result in an annual decrease in net income and cash flows of approximately $7.6
million based on the variable-rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 1999, as
a result of the increased interest expense associated with the change in rate.
Conversely, a 10% (82.2 basis point) decrease in the weighted average interest
rate on such variable-rate debt would result in an annual increase in net income
and cash flows of approximately $7.6 million based on the variable rate debt
outstanding as of December 31, 1999, as a result of the decreased interest
expense associated with the change in rate.
In September 1999, the Operating Partnership entered into a four-year
cash flow hedge agreement with Salomon Brothers Holding Company, Inc.
("Salomon"). The cash flow hedge agreement has a notional amount of $200.0
million relating to the BankBoston Term Note II. Pursuant to this agreement, the
Operating Partnership will pay Salomon on a quarterly basis at 6.183% fixed
interest rate and Salomon will pay the Operating Partnership at a floating
90-day LIBOR rate based on the same quarterly reset dates. The underlying note,
which was originally issued at a floating interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 325
basis points, was effectively converted to a fixed weighted average interest
rate of 9.43% through maturity. Effective February 1, 2000, the Operating
Partnership renegotiated certain terms and covenants under the BankBoston Term
Note II. At such time, the interest rate on the facility increased to 30-day
LIBOR plus 400 basis points, and consequently increased the effective fixed
weighted average interest rate to 10.18% through maturity. As of December 31,
1999, the cash flow hedge agreement resulted in $0.3 million of additional
interest expense.
In addition, the Company's settlement obligations under the Share
Repurchase Agreement with UBS described in Item 7. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Share Repurchase
Agreement, are subject to interest rate risk, specifically changes in the 30-day
LIBOR rate.
MARKET PRICE RISK
The Share Repurchase Agreement is subject to market rate risk because
changes in the closing share price for the Company's common shares affect the
Company's settlement obligation. Assuming the Company elects to settle in common
shares on January 4, 2001, and the market price of the common shares decreases
by 10% from the $18.38 per share closing price of the common shares on December
31, 1999, and assuming no change in the 30-day LIBOR rate from the rate at
December 31, 1999, the Company will issue an additional 133,982 common shares.
Assuming the Company elect to settle in common shares on January 4, 2001, and
the market price of the common shares increases by 10% from the $18.38 per share
closing price of the common shares of December 31, 1999, and assuming no change
in the 30-day LIBOR rate from December 31, 1999, UBS will return to the Company
133,982 common shares. The issuance of additional common shares under the terms
of the Share Repurchase Agreement would result in the reduction of the Operating
Partnership's net income per unit and net book value per unit. A change in the
market price will not affect the amount required to be paid to settle the Share
Repurchase Agreement in cash.
59
<PAGE> 61
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants.............................................................. 61
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1999 and 1998............................................. 62
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997............ 63
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997..... 64
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997............ 65
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................................................ 66
Schedule III Consolidated Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation ....................... 97
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE> 62
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To the Sole Director of Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Crescent Real
Estate Equities Limited Partnership and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and
1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, partners' capital
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
1999. These financial statements and the schedule referred to below are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and the schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Crescent Real Estate Equities
Limited Partnership and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in the index to the
financial statements is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities
and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a required part of the basic
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in our audits of the basic financial statements and, in our
opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to
be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Dallas, Texas,
March 24, 2000
61
<PAGE> 63
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1999 1998
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Investments in real estate:
Land $ 398,754 $ 400,690
Land held for development or sale 95,760 95,282
Building and improvements 3,529,344 3,569,774
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 71,716 63,626
Less - accumulated depreciation (507,520) (387,457)
-------------- --------------
Net investment in real estate 3,588,054 3,741,915
Cash and cash equivalents 72,102 109,828
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 87,939 46,841
Accounts receivable, net 37,098 32,585
Deferred rent receivable 74,271 73,635
Investments in real estate mortgages and
equity of unconsolidated companies 812,494 743,516
Notes receivable, net 133,165 187,063
Other assets, net 146,297 110,566
-------------- --------------
Total assets $ 4,951,420 $ 5,045,949
============== ==============
LIABILITIES:
Borrowings under Credit Facility $ 510,000 $ 660,000
Notes payable 2,088,929 1,658,156
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 170,980 149,442
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities 2,769,909 2,467,598
-------------- --------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
MINORITY INTERESTS: 24,648 26,727
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
Series A Preferred Units, 8,000,000 Units issued and outstanding
at December 31, 1999 and 1998 200,000 200,000
Units of Partnership Interests, 67,744,629 and 68,823,252 issued
and outstanding at December 31, 1999 and 1998,
respectively:
General partner -- outstanding 607,687 and 622,777 21,097 25,220
Limited partners' -- outstanding 67,136,942 and 68,200,475 1,923,307 2,331,441
Accumulated other comprehensive income 12,459 (5,037)
-------------- --------------
Total partners' capital 2,156,863 2,551,624
-------------- --------------
Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 4,951,420 $ 5,045,949
============== ==============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
62
<PAGE> 64
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the year ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Office and retail properties $ 614,493 $ 563,005 $ 363,324
Hotel properties 65,237 53,355 37,270
Behavioral healthcare properties 41,091 55,295 29,789
Interest and other income 25,458 26,688 16,990
------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenues 746,279 698,343 447,373
------------ ------------ ------------
EXPENSES:
Real estate taxes 84,401 75,076 44,154
Repairs and maintenance 44,024 41,160 27,783
Other rental property operating 128,723 126,733 86,931
Corporate general and administrative 16,274 16,264 12,858
Interest expense 192,033 152,214 86,441
Amortization of deferred financing costs 10,283 6,486 3,499
Depreciation and amortization 131,657 118,082 74,426
Settlement of merger dispute 15,000 -- --
Carrying value in excess of market value of
asset held for sale 16,800 -- --
Impairment and other charges related to the
behavioral healthcare poperties 162,038 -- --
Write-off of costs associated with unsuccessful
acquisitions -- 18,435 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Total expenses 801,233 554,450 336,092
------------ ------------ ------------
Operating income (54,954) 143,893 111,281
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES:
Equity in net income of unconsolidated
companies:
Office and retail properties 5,265 4,159 629
Temperature-controlled logistics properties 15,039 512 1,200
Residential development properties 42,871 33,517 18,770
Other 5,122 1,129 3,144
------------ ------------ ------------
Total other income and expenses 68,297 39,317 23,743
------------ ------------ ------------
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTERESTS 13,343 183,210 135,024
Minority interests (1,111) (1,499) (1,434)
------------ ------------ ------------
NET INCOME 12,232 181,711 133,590
PREFERRED UNITS DISTRIBUTION (13,500) (11,700) --
RETURN ON SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (583) -- --
FORWARD SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
RETURN (4,317) (3,316) --
------------ ------------ ------------
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO PARTNERS $ (6,168) $ 166,695 $ 133,590
============ ============ ============
PER UNIT DATA:
Net income (loss) - basic $ (0.09) $ 2.52 $ 2.50
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) - diluted $ (0.09) $ 2.42 $ 2.41
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are in integral part of these financial statements.
63
<PAGE> 65
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACCUMULATED
PREFERRED GENERAL LIMITED OTHER TOTAL
PARTNERS' PARTNER'S PARTNERS' COMPREHENSIVE PARTNERS'
CAPITAL CAPITAL CAPITAL INCOME CAPITAL
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Partners' capital, December 31, 1996 $ -- $ 11,539 $ 976,466 $ -- $ 988,005
Contributions -- 13,480 1,334,574 -- 1,348,054
Contribution of notes receivable -- -- 413 -- 413
Distributions -- (1,408) (139,395) -- (140,803)
Distribution of Crescent Operating Inc. shares -- (119) (11,788) -- (11,907)
Net income -- 1,336 132,254 -- 133,590
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Partners' capital, December 31, 1997 $ -- $ 24,828 $ 2,292,524 $ -- $ 2,317,352
Contributions 200,000 979 96,956 -- 297,935
Distributions -- (2,209) (218,649) -- (220,858)
Net income -- 1,700 168,311 -- 170,011
Refund of distribution on shares held in Treasury -- 7 680 -- 687
Merrill Lynch Promisorry Note -- (85) (8,381) -- (8,466)
Accumulated other comprehensive income -- -- -- (5,037) (5,037)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Partners' capital, December 31, 1998 $ 200,000 $ 25,220 $ 2,331,441 $ (5,037) $ 2,551,624
Contributions -- 383 37,890 -- 38,273
Settlement of Forward Share Purchase Agreement -- (1,494) (147,890) -- (149,384)
Distributions -- (2,999) (296,879) -- (299,878)
Net income -- (13) (1,255) -- (1,268)
Accumulated other comprehensive income -- -- -- 17,496 17,496
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Partners' capital, December 31, 1999 $ 200,000 $ 21,097 $ 1,923,307 $ 12,459 $ 2,156,863
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
64
<PAGE> 66
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 12,232 $ 181,711 $ 133,590
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 141,940 124,568 77,925
Impairment charge related to the
behavioral healthcare real estate assets 103,773 -- --
Carrying value in excess of market value of
assets held for sale 16,800 -- --
Minority interests 1,111 1,499 1,434
Non-cash compensation 118 174 172
Distributions received in excess of equity in earnings
from unconsolidated companies -- 9,308 --
Equity in earnings net of distributions received
from unconsolidated companies (17,202) -- (12,536)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (4,513) (2,536) (14,719)
Deferred rent receivable (636) (34,047) (23,371)
Other assets 30,667 (22,646) (29,286)
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (9,682) (3,161) (417)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities 21,538 22,222 78,758
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 296,146 277,092 211,550
------------- ------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of investment properties -- (530,807) (1,523,735)
Development of investment properties (27,781) (31,875) (9,012)
Capital expenditures - rental properties (20,254) (31,339) (22,005)
Tenant improvement and leasing costs - rental properties (58,462) (68,779) (53,886)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (31,416) (2,152) (4,229)
Investment in unconsolidated companies (93,869) (147,208) (278,001)
Investment in residential development corporations 13,722 35,613 (270,174)
Notes receivable 53,898 (27,220) (128,124)
Escrow deposits (500) 5,760 (5,600)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities (164,662) (798,007) (2,294,766)
------------- ------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: . .
Debt financing costs (16,665) (9,567) (12,132)
Borrowings under Credit Facility 51,920 672,150 1,171,000
Payments under Credit Facility (201,920) (362,150) (861,000)
Debt proceeds 929,700 418,100 1,127,596
Debt payments (498,927) (376,301) (493,203)
Capital distributions - joint venture partner (3,190) (2,951) (2,522)
Capital contributions - joint venture partner -- -- --
Capital contributions to the Operating Partnership 32,634 457,717 1,346,713
Settlement of Forward Share Purchase Agreement (149,384) -- --
Preferred Unit distributions (13,500) (11,700) --
Distributions from the Operating Partnership (299,878) (220,618) (152,708)
------------- ------------- -------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (169,210) 564,680 2,123,744
------------- ------------- -------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (37,726) 43,765 40,528
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
Beginning of period 109,828 66,063 25,535
------------- ------------- -------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
End of period $ 72,102 $ 109,828 $ 66,063
============= ============= =============
The accompanying notes are integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE> 67
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
ORGANIZATION
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited
partnership ("CREELP" and, together with its direct and indirect ownership
interests in limited partnerships, corporations and limited liability companies,
the "Operating Partnership"), was formed under the terms of a limited
partnership agreement dated February 9, 1994. The Operating Partnership is
controlled by Crescent Real Estate Equities Company, a Texas real estate
investment trust (the "Company"), through the Company's ownership of all of the
outstanding stock of Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd., a Delaware corporation
("CREE, Ltd."), which owns an approximately 1% general partner interest in the
Operating Partnership. In addition, the Company owns an approximately 89%
limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership, with the remaining
approximately 10% limited partner interest held by other limited partners. The
Operating Partnership directly or indirectly owns substantially all of the
economic interests in seven separate single purpose limited partnerships (all
formed for the purpose of obtaining securitized debt), with the remaining
interests owned indirectly by the Company through seven separate corporations,
each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of CREE, Ltd. and a general partner
of one of the seven limited partnerships.
All of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership other than the
Company own, in addition to limited partner interests, units. Each unit entitles
the holder to exchange the unit (and the related limited partner interest) for
two common shares of the Company or, at the Company's option, an equivalent
amount of cash. For purposes of this report, the term "unit" or "unit of
partnership interest" refers to the limited partner interest and, if applicable,
related units held by a limited partner. Accordingly, the Company's
approximately 89% limited partner interest has been treated as equivalent, for
purposes of this report, to 60,160,990 units, and the remaining approximately
10% limited partner interest has been treated as equivalent, for purposes of
this report, to 6,975,952 units. In addition, the Company's 1% general partner
interest has been treated as equivalent, for purposes of this report, to 607,687
units.
SEGMENTS
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's assets and
operations were composed of five major investment segments:
o Office and Retail Segment;
o Hospitality Segment;
o Residential Development Segment;
o Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment; and
o Behavioral Healthcare Segment.
Within these segments, the Operating Partnership owned directly or
indirectly the following real estate assets (the "Properties") as of December
31, 1999:
o OFFICE AND RETAIL SEGMENT consisted of 89 office properties
(collectively referred to as the "Office Properties") located in 31
metropolitan submarkets in nine states, with an aggregate of
approximately 31.8 million net rentable square feet and seven retail
properties (collectively referred to as the "Retail Properties") with
an aggregate of approximately 0.8 million net rentable square feet.
See Note 17. Dispositions.
66
<PAGE> 68
o HOSPITALITY SEGMENT consisted of five upscale business class hotels
with a total of 2,168 rooms, three luxury resorts and spas with a
total of 516 rooms and two Canyon Ranch destination fitness resorts
and spas that can accommodate up to 462 guests daily (collectively
referred to as the "Hotel Properties"). All Hotel Properties, except
the Omni Austin Hotel, are leased to subsidiaries of Crescent
Operating, Inc. ("COI"). The Omni Austin Hotel is leased to HCD
Austin Corporation.
o RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SEGMENT consisted of the Operating
Partnership's ownership of real estate mortgages and non-voting
common stock representing interests ranging from 40% to 95% in five
unconsolidated residential development corporations (collectively
referred to as the "Residential Development Corporations"), which in
turn, through joint venture or partnership arrangements, currently
own 14 residential development properties (collectively referred to
as the "Residential Development Properties").
o TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS SEGMENT (FORMERLY THE REFRIGERATED
STORAGE SEGMENT) consisted of the Operating Partnership's indirect
39.6% interest in three partnerships (collectively referred to as the
"Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships"), each of which owns
one or more corporations or limited liability companies (collectively
referred to as the "Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations")
which, as of December 31, 1999, directly or indirectly owned 89
temperature-controlled logistics properties (collectively referred to
as the "Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties") with an
aggregate of approximately 428.3 million cubic feet (17.0 million
square feet). This segment was restructured in 1999, and the new
ownership structure was effective as of March 12, 1999. See Note 5.
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages and Equity of Unconsolidated
Companies.
o BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE SEGMENT consisted of 88 properties in 24 states
(collectively referred to as the "Behavioral Healthcare Properties")
that were leased to Charter Behavioral Health Systems, LLC. ("CBHS")
and its subsidiaries. CBHS was formed to operate the behavioral
healthcare business located at the Behavioral Healthcare Properties
and is owned 10% by a subsidiary of Magellan Health Services, Inc.
("Magellan") and 90% by COI and an affiliate of COI. On February 16,
2000, CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are subject to the master
lease with the Operating Partnership filed voluntary chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware. Of these 88 Behavioral Healthcare Properties,
37 are designated as the "Core Properties" for the conduct of CBHS's
business and remain subject to a master lease. The other 51
Behavioral Healthcare Properties, at which CBHS has ceased operations
or is planning to cease operations, are designated as the "Non-Core
Properties", and were being actively marketed for sale at December
31, 1999. See Note 17. Dispositions and Note 18. CBHS for a
description of the current status of CBHS and the Operating
Partnership's investment in the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
The Company owns its assets and carries on its operation and other
activities through the Operating Partnership and its other subsidiaries. The
limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership acknowledges that all
of the Company's operating expenses are incurred for the benefit of the
Operating Partnership and provides that the Operating Partnership shall
reimburse the Company for all such expenses. Accordingly, expenses of the
Company are reimbursed by the Operating Partnership.
See Note 4. Segment Reporting for a table showing revenues and funds
from operations for each of these investment segments for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997 and identifiable assets for each of these
investment segments at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
The following table shows, by entity, the Properties Cresent Equities and its
subsidiaries owned as of December 31, 1999:
Operating Partnership: 62 Office Properties, six Hotel Properties and
five Retail Properties
Crescent Real Estate The Aberdeen, The Avallon, Caltex House, The
Funding I, L.P.: Citadel, The Crescent Atrium, The Crescent
("Funding I") Office Towers, Regency Plaza One, UPR Plaza and
Waterside Commons
67
<PAGE> 69
Crescent Real Estate Albuquerque Plaza, Barton Oaks Plaza One,
Funding II, L.P.: Briargate Office and Research Center, Hyatt
("Funding II") Regency Albuquerque, Hyatt Regency Beaver
Creek, Las Colinas Plaza, Liberty Plaza I & II,
MacArthur Center I & II, Ptarmigan Place,
Stanford Corporate Centre, Two Renaissance
Square and 12404 Park Central
Crescent Real Estate Greenway Plaza Office Properties and
Funding III, IV and V, L.P.: Renaissance Houston Hotel(1)
("Funding III, IV and V")
Crescent Real Estate Canyon Ranch-Lenox
Funding VI, L.P.:
("Funding VI")
Crescent Real Estate 88 Behavioral Healthcare Properties
Funding VII, L.P.
("Funding VII")
- ----------
(1) Funding III owns nine of the 10 Office Properties in the Greenway Plaza
Office portfolio and the Renaissance Houston Hotel; Funding IV owns the
central heated and chilled water plant building located at Greenway
Plaza; and Funding V owns Coastal Tower, the remaining Office Property
in the Greenway Plaza Office portfolio.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Operating
Partnership include all direct and indirect subsidiary entities. The equity
interests in those direct and indirect subsidiaries the Operating Partnership
does not own are reflected as minority interests. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain amounts in prior year financial statements have been
reclassified to conform with current year presentation.
All information relating to the Company's common shares has been
adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in the form of a 100%
share dividend paid on March 26, 1997 to shareholders and unitholders of record
on March 20, 1997.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
NET INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE
Real estate is carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation.
Betterments, major renovations, and certain costs directly related to the
acquisition, improvements and leasing of real estate are capitalized.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, as follows:
Buildings and Improvements 5 to 40 years
Tenant Improvements Terms of leases
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment 3 to 10 years
An impairment loss is recognized on a property by property basis on
Properties classified as held for use, when expected undiscounted cash flows are
less than the carrying value of the Property. In cases where the Operating
Partnership does not expect to recover its carrying costs on a Property, the
Operating Partnership reduces its carrying costs to fair value, and for
Properties held for disposition, the Operating Partnership reduces its carrying
costs to the fair value less costs to sell. See Note 17. Dispositions and Note
18. CBHS for a description of impairment losses recognized during 1999 for one
of the Office Properties and the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
68
<PAGE> 70
Depreciation expense is not recognized on Properties once classified as
held for disposition.
CONCENTRATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
The Operating Partnership's Office Properties are located primarily in
the Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas. As of December 31,
1999, the Office Properties in Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston represented
approximately 72% of the Operating Partnership's office portfolio based on total
net rentable square feet. The Dallas/Fort Worth Office Properties accounted for
approximately 39% of that amount, and the Houston Office Properties accounted
for the remaining approximately 33%. As a result of the geographic
concentration, the operations of the Operating Partnership could be adversely
affected by a recession or general economic downturn in the areas where these
Properties are located.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Operating Partnership considers all highly liquid investments
purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash and cash
equivalents.
RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Restricted cash includes escrows established pursuant to certain
mortgage financing arrangements for real estate taxes, insurance, security
deposits, ground lease expenditures, capital expenditures and monthly interest
carrying costs paid in arrears.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consist principally of leasing costs, deferred financing
costs, and marketable securities. Leasing costs are amortized on a straight-line
basis during the terms of the respective leases, and unamortized leasing costs
are written off upon early termination of lease agreements. Deferred financing
costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective
loans. Marketable securities are considered available-for-sale and are marked to
market value on a monthly basis. The corresponding unrealized gains and losses
are included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
DEFERRED COMPENSATION ON RESTRICTED SHARES
Deferred compensation on restricted shares relates to the issuance of
restricted shares to employees of the Company. Such restricted shares are
amortized to expense during the applicable vesting period.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Operating Partnership does not use derivative financing instruments
for trading purposes, but utilizes them to manage exposure to variable rate
debt. The Operating Partnership accounts for its derivative instruments under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", which was adopted in the third
quarter of 1999.
Under SFAS No. 133, the Operating Partnership's derivatives are
considered cash flow hedges which are used to mitigate the variability of cash
flows. On a monthly basis, the cash flow hedge is marked to fair value through
comprehensive income (outside earnings), and on a monthly basis the cash flow
hedge's gain or loss is reported in earnings when the interest on the underlying
debt affects earnings.
On November 19, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with UBS AG
("UBS") that UBS would purchase the Company's common shares, and the Company
would be obligated to repurchase a portion of its common shares from UBS. The
Company may settle the agreement in cash or common shares at its option.
Therefore, the Operating Partnership accounts for the
69
<PAGE> 71
transaction as an equity transaction. The guaranteed return to UBS is equal to
30-day LIBOR plus 250 basis points, and is accounted for as a preferred
dividend.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of the short
maturities of these instruments. The fair value of notes receivable, which
approximates carrying value, is estimated based on year-end interest rates for
receivables of comparable maturity. Notes payable and borrowings under the
Operating Partnership's line of credit with BankBoston N.A. ("Credit Facility")
have aggregate carrying values which approximate their estimated fair values
based upon the current interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining
maturities, without considering the adequacy of the underlying collateral.
Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent
information available to management as of December 31, 1999 and 1998.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
OFFICE & RETAIL PROPERTIES The Operating Partnership, as a lessor, has
retained substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the Office
and Retail Properties and accounts for its leases as operating leases. Income on
leases, which includes scheduled increases in rental rates during the lease term
and/or abated rent payments for various periods following the tenant's lease
commencement date, is recognized on a straight-line basis. Deferred rent
receivable represents the excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight-line
basis over cash received pursuant to the applicable lease provisions.
HOTEL PROPERTIES The Operating Partnership cannot, consistent with the
Company's status as a REIT, operate the Hotel Properties directly. It has leased
all of the Hotel Properties except The Omni Austin Hotel to subsidiaries of COI
pursuant to nine separate leases (See Note 16. Formation and Capitalization of
COI). As of January 1, 1999, the Omni Austin Hotel has been leased under a
separate lease to HCD Austin Corporation. The leases provide for the payment by
the lessee of the Hotel Property of (i) base rent, with periodic rent increases
if applicable, (ii) percentage rent based on a percentage of gross receipts or
gross room revenues, as applicable, above a specified amount, and (iii) a
percentage of gross food and beverage revenues above a specified amount for
certain Hotel Properties. Base rental income under these leases is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. In 1999,
percentage rental income was recognized on an accrual basis. In December 1999,
the SEC staff released Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue
Recognition", which prohibits contingent revenue from being accrued until the
thresholds upon which it is based have been met. However, SAB No. 101 had no
material impact on the Operating Partnership's financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 1999, because all of the thresholds upon which percentage
rental income is based had been met by December 31, 1999. In accordance with SAB
No. 101, percentage rental income will not be recognized in the year 2000 until
the thresholds upon which it is based are met. Management does not believe this
change will have a material impact on its interim or annual financial
statements.
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES The Operating Partnership has leased
the Behavioral Healthcare Properties to CBHS and its subsidiaries under a
triple-net lease. CBHS's business has been negatively affected by many factors,
including adverse industry conditions. During 1999, CBHS failed to perform in
accordance with its operating budget. In the third quarter of 1999, the
Operating Partnership began to reflect CBHS rent on a cash basis, and will
continue to reflect rent on a cash basis going forward. In the third quarter of
1999, the Operating Partnership wrote-off the rent that was deferred according
to the CBHS lease agreement from the commencement of the lease in June 1997
through June 30, 1999. The balance written-off totaled $25,600. The Operating
Partnership deferred cash rent payments for November and December 1999 due from
CBHS. See Note 18. CBHS for further discussion regarding the status of CBHS,
including the filing of voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions subsequent to
December 31, 1999, and the status of the Operating Partnership's investment in
the Behavioral Healthcare Properties.
70
<PAGE> 72
INCOME TAXES
No provision has been made for federal or state income taxes, because
each partner's proportionate share of income or loss from the Operating
Partnership will be passed through on such partner's tax return.
EARNINGS PER UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" ("EPS") specifies the computation,
presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share. Basic EPS
excludes all dilution while Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that
could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were
exercised or converted into common shares.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------------
Wtd. Avg. Per Unit Wtd. Avg. Per Unit Wtd. Avg. Per Unit
Loss Units Amount Income Units Amount Income Units Amount
------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Basic EPS -
Net income (loss) available
to partners $(6,168) 67,977 $ (0.09) $166,695 66,214 $ 2.52 $133,590 53,418 $ 2.50
========= ========= =========
Effect of dilutive securities:
Unit options -- 837 -- 1,952 -- 2,069
Assumed conversion of
Series B preferred units -- -- -- 1,739 -- --
Additional units obligation relating to:
Equity swap agreement -- -- -- 92 -- --
Forward share purchase
agreement -- 131 3,316 197 -- --
------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------
Diluted EPS -
Net income (loss) available
to partners $(6,168) 68,945 $ (0.09) $170,011 70,194 $ 2.42 $133,590 55,487 $ 2.41
======= ====== ========= ======== ====== ========= ======== ====== =========
</TABLE>
The effect of the conversion of the Series A Convertible Cumulative
Preferred Units is not included in the computation of Diluted EPS for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, since the effect of their conversion is
antidilutive.
71
<PAGE> 73
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid
investments purchased with an original maturity of 90 days or less are included
in cash and cash equivalents.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE TO STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid ............................................. $188,819 $145,603 $78,980
Additional interest paid in conjunction with cash flow
hedge .................................................. 344 -- --
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of Operating Partnership units in conjunction
with settlement of an obligation ....................... $ 1,786 $ 19,972 $ --
Unit obligation in conjunction with an
investment ............................................. -- 21,000 1,200
Two-for-one common share dividend ......................... -- -- 362
Mortgage note assumed in conjunction with property
acquisitions ........................................... -- 46,934 97,923
Debt incurred in conjunction with the termination of
equity swap agreement .................................. -- 184,299 --
Acquisition of partnership interests ...................... 3,774 -- --
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities ... 17,216 5,037 --
Forward Share Purchase Agreement Return ................... 4,317 3,316 --
Return on Share Repurchase Agreement ...................... 583 -- --
Impairment and other charges related to the
behavioral healthcare assets ........................... 162,038 -- --
Carrying value in excess of market value of asset held
for sale ............................................... 16,800 -- --
Adjustment of cash flow hedge to fair value ............... 280 -- --
</TABLE>
ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On January 1, 1998, the Operating Partnership adopted SFAS No. 130,
"Reporting Comprehensive Income," which established standards for the reporting
and presentation of comprehensive income and its components (generally, total
nonowner changes in equity). As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 130,
comprehensive income has been presented as part of the statements of
shareholders' equity. At December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's
comprehensive income balance was $12,459, primarily attributable to unrealized
gains on marketable securities. In 1998, the Operating Partnership's
comprehensive income balance was ($5,037), primarily attributable to unrealized
losses on marketable securities. Prior to 1998, the Operating Partnership's
comprehensive income was not material to the Operating Partnership's financial
statements.
Beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, the Operating
Partnership adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information," which established standards for the way that public
business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual
financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected
information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to
shareholders. This statement was effective for financial statements for periods
beginning after December 15, 1997. See Note 4. Segment Reporting.
72
<PAGE> 74
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 133, which provides that all derivative instruments should be
recognized as either assets or liabilities depending on the rights or
obligations under the contract and that all derivative instruments be measured
at fair value. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133 - an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133", which
deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 133 to be effective for all fiscal
quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Operating
Partnership elected to implement SFAS No. 133 in the third quarter of 1999. See
Note 8. Cash Flow Hedges for a description of the impact on the Operating
Partnership's financial statements for the year ended December 31,1999.
In December 1999, the SEC staff released SAB No. 101, which provides
guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in
financial statements. SAB No. 101 prohibits contingent revenue from being
accrued until the thresholds upon which it is based have been met. In 1999,
percentage rental income was recognized on an accrual basis. However, SAB No.
101 had no material impact on the Operating Partnership's financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 1999, because all of the thresholds upon which
percentage rental income is based had been met by December 31, 1999. In
accordance with SAB No. 101, percentage rental income will not be recognized in
the year 2000 until the thresholds upon which it is based are met. Management
does not believe this change will have a material impact on its interim or
annual financial statements.
3. PROPERTIES HELD FOR DISPOSITION:
Office and Retail Segment
In pursuit of management's objective to dispose of non-strategic or
non-core assets, at December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership was actively
marketing for sale its wholly-owned interests in 10 Office Properties, which are
included in the Net Investment in Real Estate of $3,588,054. The carrying value
of these Properties at December 31, 1999 was approximately $183,323. The
Operating Partnership continually evaluates the portfolio of Properties held for
disposition. In the fourth quarter of 1999, two Properties in Dallas, Texas were
removed from the original pool of 12 Properties held for disposition. Six of the
Properties are located in Dallas, Texas, two are located in New Orleans,
Louisiana, one is located in Denver, Colorado and one is located in Omaha,
Nebraska. During the year ended December 31, 1999, bids were received on these
Properties either individually or in various combinations. Management is
currently in the process of evaluating the bids for the remaining Office
Properties to determine their economic viability as well as the
credit-worthiness of the potential purchasers and their ability to close the
transactions. The disposition of these Properties remains subject to the
negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions. The Operating
Partnership anticipates completing any economically justified sales of these
Office Properties by the end of the second quarter of 2000.
The following table summarizes the condensed results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 for the 10 Office Properties held for
disposition. These Properties are classified as held for sale, and depreciation
expense has not been recognized since June 30, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenue $39,214 $38,190
Operating Expenses 18,120 16,390
------- -------
Net Operating Income $21,094 $21,800
======= =======
</TABLE>
See Note 17. Dispositions for a description of the impairment loss
recognized on one of these Office Properties and a description of the
disposition of certain properties subsequent to December 31, 1999.
73
<PAGE> 75
Behavioral Healthcare Segment
The 51 Non-Core Behavioral Healthcare Properties were classified as
held for disposition at December 31, 1999, and depreciation expense has not been
recognized since November 10, 1999. The carrying value for these Properties at
December 31, 1999 was approximately $124,700. The Operating Partnership is
actively marketing the Non-Core Properties for sale. See Note 17. Dispositions
for a description of the sale of certain Non-Core Properties.
Other
The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P., owned by the
Operating Partnership and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been
actively marketing for sale certain Property assets (multi-family, retail and
office/venture tech portfolios) located in The Woodlands. These assets include
the Operating Partnership's 12 Office Properties and four Retail Properties
located in The Woodlands.
4. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Operating Partnership adopted SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" beginning with the year ended
December 31, 1998. The Operating Partnership currently has five major investment
segments: the Office and Retail Segment; the Hospitality Segment; the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment; the Residential Development Segment;
and the Behavioral Healthcare Segment. Management organizes the segments within
the Operating Partnership based on property type for making operating decisions
and assessing performance. Investment segments for SFAS No. 131 are determined
on the same basis.
The Operating Partnership uses funds from operations ("FFO") as the
measure of segment profit or loss. FFO, based on the definition adopted by the
Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
("NAREIT") and as used in this document, means:
o Net Income (Loss) - determined in accordance with GAAP;
o excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of
property;
o excluding adjustments not of a normal or recurring nature;
o plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets; and
o after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
ventures.
NAREIT developed FFO as a relative measure of performance and liquidity
of an equity REIT to recognize that income-producing real estate historically
has not depreciated on the basis determined under GAAP. The Operating
Partnership considers FFO an appropriate measure of performance for an equity
REIT, and for its operating segments. However, the Operating Partnership's
measure of FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of REITs
(other than the Company) because these REITs may apply the definition of FFO in
a different manner than the Operating Partnership.
74
<PAGE> 76
Selected financial information related to each segment for the years
ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 is presented below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Office and Retail Properties $ 614,493 $ 563,005 $ 363,324
Hospitality Properties 65,237 53,355 37,270
Behavioral Healthcare Properties 41,091 55,295 29,789
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties -- -- --
Residential Development Properties -- -- --
Corporate and Other 25,458 26,688 16,990
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED REVENUE $ 746,279 $ 698,343 $ 447,373
=========== =========== ===========
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS:
Office and Retail Segment $ 367,830 $ 325,442 $ 204,243
Hospitality Segment 64,079 52,375 36,439
Behavioral Healthcare Segment 15,488 55,295 29,789
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment 37,439 28,626 2,200
Residential Development Segment 74,597 58,892 25,623
Corporate and other adjustments
Interest expense (192,033) (152,214) (86,441)
Preferred unit dividends (13,500) (11,700) --
Interest and other income 18,151 19,696 15,401
Corporate general & administrative (16,274) (16,264) (12,858)
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS $ 355,777 $ 360,148 $ 214,396
----------- ----------- -----------
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS TO
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME:
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets $ (128,403) $ (115,678) $ (72,503)
Settlement of merger dispute (15,000) -- --
Carrying value in excess of market value of asset
held for sale (16,800) -- --
Impairment and other charges related to the
behavioral healthcare assets (136,435) -- --
Write-off costs associated with unsuccessful acquisitions -- (18,435) --
Gain on behavioral healthcare property disposition 439 -- --
Adjustment for investments in real estate mortgages
and equity of unconsolidated companies:
Office and Retail Properties (6,110) (2,530) (451)
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties (22,400) (28,115) (1,000)
Residential Development Properties (31,725) (25,379) (6,852)
Other (611) -- --
Preferred unit dividends 13,500 11,700 --
----------- ----------- -----------
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME $ 12,232 $ 181,711 $ 133,590
=========== =========== ===========
EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED
COMPANIES:
Office and Retail Properties $ 5,265 $ 4,159 $ 629
Hospitality Properties -- -- --
Behavioral Healthcare Properties -- -- --
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties 15,039 512 1,200
Residential Development Properties 42,871 33,517 18,770
Corporate and other 5,122 1,129 3,144
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF
UNCONSOLIDATED COMPANIES $ 68,297 $ 39,317 $ 23,743
=========== =========== ===========
IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS:
Office and Retail Segment $ 3,301,979 $ 3,214,208 $ 2,651,877
Hospitality Segment 458,266 453,583 363,424
Behavioral Healthcare Segment 249,049 386,434 384,796
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Segment 293,243 277,856 153,994
Residential Development Segment 279,197 289,615 317,950
Other 369,686 424,253 310,834
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL IDENTIFIABLE ASSETS $ 4,951,420 $ 5,045,949 $ 4,182,875
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
75
<PAGE> 77
During 1999, COI and CBHS were the Operating Partnership's two largest
lessees in terms of total consolidated rental revenues derived from leases.
Total rental revenues from COI and total cash rental revenues from CBHS for the
year ended December 31, 1999 were approximately 8% and 5% respectively, of the
Operating Partnership's total consolidated rental revenues. COI was the lessee
for nine of the Hotel Properties for the year ended December 31, 1999, and CBHS
was the sole lessee of the Behavioral Healthcare Properties during that period.
Due to its reorganization and bankruptcy proceedings, CBHS will no longer be one
of the Operating Partnership's largest lessees. See Note 18. CBHS.
See Note 5. Investments in Real Estate Mortgages and Equity of
Unconsolidated Companies for a description of the sole lessee of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties.
5. INVESTMENTS IN REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES AND EQUITY OF UNCONSOLIDATED COMPANIES:
The following is a summary of the Operating Partnership's ownership in
significant unconsolidated companies:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY'S OWNERSHIP
ENTITY CLASSIFICATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999
- --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- -----------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Desert Mountain Development Corporation Residential Development Corporation 95%(1)
Houston Area Development Corp. Residential Development Corporation 94%(1)
The Woodlands Land Company, Inc. Residential Development Corporation 95%(1)
Crescent Development Management Corp. Residential Development Corporation 90%(1)
Mira Vista Development Corp. Residential Development Corporation 94%(1)
Crescent CS Holdings Corp. Crescent Subsidiary 99%(2)
Crescent CS Holdings II Corp. Crescent Subsidiary 99%(2)
The Woodlands Commercial Office and Retail (various commercial
Properties Company, L.P. properties)(3) 42.50%
Main Street Partners, L.P. Office and Retail (office property -
Bank One Center) 50%
DBL Holdings, Inc. Other(4) 95%
Metropolitan Partners, LLC Other (5)
CRL Investments, Inc. Other 95%
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) See Item 2. Properties and the Residential Development Properties Table
included in that section for the Residential Development Corporation's
ownership interest in the Residential Development Properties.
(2) The Crescent Subsidiaries have a 39.6% interest in each of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships. Accordingly, each of the
Crescent Subsidiaries has an indirect 39.6% interest in the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. See "Temperature-Controlled
Logistics" section below.
(3) See the "Office and Retail Segment" section below for more information
regarding certain commercial property assets that the Operating Partnership
intends to sell.
(4) See Note 17. Dispositions for more information regarding certain interests
that the Operating Partnership has sold. (5) See "Other" section below for
a description of the Operating Partnership's investment in Metropolitan
Partners, LLC.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES
On April 29, 1999, a partnership in which Crescent Development Management
Corporation ("CDMC") has a 64% economic interest finalized the purchase of
Riverfront Park (previously known as "The Commons"), a master planned
residential development on 23 acres in the Central Platte Valley near downtown
Denver, Colorado for approximately $25,000. In the first quarter of 2000, the
partnership has entered into contracts relating to the sale of 9.7 acres of
Riverfront Park, which is expected to close in the second quarter of 2000. The
acreage is in close proximity to several major entertainment and recreational
facilities including Coors Field (home to the Major League Baseball's Colorado
Rockies), Elitch Gardens (an amusement park) the new Pepsi Center (home to the
National Hockey League's Colorado Avalanche and the National Basketball
Association's Denver Nuggets), and the new downtown Commons Park.
76
<PAGE> 78
TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED LOGISTICS PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership held an indirect
39.6% interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships, which own
the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations, which directly or indirectly
own the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. The business operations
associated with the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties are owned by
AmeriCold Logistics, which is owned 60% by Vornado Operating L.P. and 40% by a
subsidiary of COI, in which the Operating Partnership has no interest. COI holds
an indirect 0.4% interest in the Temperature-Controlled Logistics Partnerships.
COI has an option to require the Operating Partnership to purchase COI's
remaining 1% economic interest, representing all of the voting stock, in each of
the Crescent Subsidiaries at such time as the purchase would not, in the opinion
of counsel to the Company, adversely affect the status of the Company as a REIT,
for an aggregate price, payable by the Operating Partnership, of approximately
$3,400.
AmeriCold Logistics, as sole lessee of the Temperature-Controlled
Logistics Properties, entered into triple-net master leases of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties with certain of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations. Each of the
Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties is subject to one or more of the
leases, each of which has an initial term of 15 years, subject to two, five-year
renewal options. Under the leases, AmeriCold Logistics is required to pay for
all costs arising from the operation, maintenance, and repair of property as
well as property capital expenditures in excess of $5,000 annually. For the
period of March 12, 1999 to December 31, 1999, base rent and percentage rent was
approximately $135,800 of which base rent represented approximately 80%.
AmeriCold Logistics has the right to defer a portion of the rent for up to three
years beginning on March 12, 1999 to the extent that available cash, as defined
in the leases, is insufficient to pay such rent, and pursuant thereto, rent was
deferred as of December 31, 1999, of which the Operating Partnership's share was
$2,138.
OFFICE AND RETAIL PROPERTIES
The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P., owned by the
Operating Partnership and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been
actively marketing for sale certain property assets (multi-family, retail and
office/venture tech portfolios) located in The Woodlands. As of December 31,
1999, the multi-family portfolio had been sold. See Note 17. Dispositions for a
description of the sale of these properties.
OTHER
Metropolitan
On December 8, 1998, Tower Realty Trust ("Tower"), Reckson Associates
Realty Corporation ("Reckson"), and Metropolitan Partners, LLC ("Metropolitan")
entered into a revised agreement and plan of merger that superseded the merger
agreement to which the Operating Partnership was a party. Under the revised
agreement, Metropolitan agreed to acquire Tower for a combination of cash and
Reckson exchangeable Class B common shares. The Operating Partnership, Reckson
and Metropolitan agreed that the Operating Partnership's investment in
Metropolitan would be an $85,000 preferred member interest in Metropolitan. In
connection with the revised agreement, the Operating Partnership contributed
$10,000 of the $85,000 required capital contribution to Metropolitan in December
1998 and contributed the remaining $75,000 to Metropolitan upon satisfaction of
all of the conditions to the funding on May 19, 1999. The Operating
Partnership's $85,000 preferred member interest in Metropolitan at December 31,
1999 would equate to an approximate 20% equity interest.
The investment has a cash flow preference of 7.5% for a two-year period
and may be redeemed by Metropolitan within the two-year period for $85,000, plus
an amount sufficient to provide a 9.5% internal rate of return to the Operating
Partnership. If Metropolitan does not redeem the preferred interest upon
expiration of the two-year period, the Operating Partnership may convert the
interest either into (i) a common equity interest in Metropolitan or (ii) shares
of common stock of Reckson at a conversion price of $24.61.
77
<PAGE> 79
CRL Investments, Inc.
The Operating Partnership has a 95% economic interest, representing all
of the non-voting stock in CRL Investments, Inc. ("CRL"), which has a 20%
economic interest in CR License, LLC, the entity which owns the right to the
future use of the "Canyon Ranch" name. CRL has the opportunity through July 2000
to pay $3,000 to obtain an additional 10% interest in CR License, LLC. CRL also
has an effective 60% economic interest in the Canyon Ranch Spa Club in the
Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Canyon Ranch Spa Club opened in June
1999 and is the first project to expand the franchise value of the "Canyon
Ranch" name.
The Operating Partnership reports its share of income and losses based
on its ownership interest in its respective equity investments. The following
summarized information for all unconsolidated companies is presented on an
aggregate basis and classified under the captions "Residential Development
Corporations", "Temperature-Controlled Logistics Corporations", "Office and
Retail" and "Other", as applicable, as of December 31, 1999, 1998, and 1997.
78
<PAGE> 80
BALANCE SHEETS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1999
--------------------------------------------------
TEMPERATURE-
RESIDENTIAL CONTROLLED
DEVELOPMENT LOGISTICS OFFICE AND
CORPORATIONS CORPORATIONS RETAIL OTHER
------------ ------------ ---------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate, net $692,033 $1,335,326 $433,632
Cash 30,184 8,295 24,223
Other assets 193,712 187,695 40,067
-------- ---------- --------
Total assets $915,929 $1,531,316 $497,922
======== ========== ========
Notes payable $321,655 $ 594,398 $296,858
Notes payable to the Operating Partnership 148,990 11,333 --
Other liabilities 228,657 168,777 24,467
Equity 216,627 756,808 176,597
-------- ---------- --------
Total liabilities and equity $915,929 $1,531,316 $497,922
======== ========== ========
Operating Partnership share of
unconsolidated debt $160,169 $ 235,382 $137,779
======== ========== ========
Operating Partnership's investments in
real estate mortgages and equity of uncon-
solidated companies $279,197 $ 293,243 $100,131 $ 139,923
======== ========== ======== =========
</TABLE>
SUMMARY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
--------------------------------------------------
TEMPERATURE-
RESIDENTIAL CONTROLLED
DEVELOPMENT LOGISTICS OFFICE AND
CORPORATIONS CORPORATIONS RETAIL OTHER
------------ ------------ ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues $502,583 $ 264,266 $78,534
Expenses:
Operating expense 394,858 127,516(1) 27,008
Interest expense 4,920 47,273 19,321
Depreciation and amortization 14,295 54,574 19,273
Taxes 22,549 (6,084) --
-------- --------- -------
Total expenses 436,622 223,279 65,602
-------- --------- -------
Net income $ 65,961 $ 40,987(1) $12,932
======== ========= =======
Operating Partnership's equity in net
income of unconsolidated companies $ 42,871 $ 15,039 $ 5,265 $ 5,122
======== ========= ======= =======
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Inclusive of the management fee paid to Vornado Realty Trust (1% per annum
of the Total Combined Assets).
79
<PAGE> 81
BALANCE SHEETS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1998
---------------------------------------------------
TEMPERATURE-
RESIDENTIAL CONTROLLED
DEVELOPMENT LOGISTICS OFFICE AND
CORPORATIONS CORPORATIONS RETAIL OTHER
------------ ------------ ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate, net $623,106 $1,308,059 $475,322
Cash 25,849 14,219 31,047
Other assets 156,782 420,934 16,485
-------- ---------- --------
Total assets $805,737 $1,743,212 $522,854
======== ========== ========
Notes payable $295,998 $ 617,166 $258,000
Notes payable to the Operating Partnership 164,578 -- --
Other liabilities 131,874 396,836 42,193
Equity 213,287 729,210 222,662
-------- ---------- --------
Total liabilities and equity $805,737 $1,743,212 $522,855
======== ========== ========
Operating Partnership's share of
unconsolidated debt $137,098 $ 234,523 $121,275
======== ========== ========
Operating Partnership's investments in
real estate mortgages and equity of uncon-
solidated companies $289,615 $ 277,856 $113,625 $62,421
======== ========== ======== =======
</TABLE>
SUMMARY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
-------------------------------------------------
TEMPERATURE-
RESIDENTIAL CONTROLLED
DEVELOPMENT LOGISTICS OFFICE AND
CORPORATIONS CORPORATIONS RETAIL OTHER
------------ ------------ ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues $372,378 $567,845 $69,326
Expenses:
Operating expense 283,138 448,972(1) 28,259
Interest expense 4,231 45,701 17,962
Depreciation and amortization 8,572 59,363 13,959
Taxes 21,227 4,548 --
-------- -------- -------
Total expenses 317,168 558,584 60,180
-------- -------- -------
Net income $ 55,210 $ 9,261(1) $ 9,146
======== ======== =======
Operating Partnership's equity in net income
of unconsolidated companies $ 33,517 $ 512 $ 4,159 $1,129
======== ======== ======= ======
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Inclusive of the management fee paid to Vornado Realty Trust (1% per annum
of the Total Combined Assets).
SUMMARY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
--------------------------------
TEMPERATURE-
CONTROLLED
LOGISTICS
RESIDENTIAL CORPORATIONS,
DEVELOPMENT OFFICE AND RETAIL,
CORPORATIONS AND OTHER
------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Total revenues $173,764 $103,796
Total expenses 151,090 90,995(1)
-------- --------
Net income $ 22,674 $ 12,801(1)
======== ========
Operating Partnership's equity in net
income of unconsolidated companies $ 18,770 $ 4,972
======== ========
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) Inclusive of the management fee paid to Vornado Realty Trust (1% per annum
of the Total Combined Assets).
80
<PAGE> 82
6. OTHER ASSETS, NET:
Other assets, net consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Leasing costs $ 99,232 $ 76,385
Deferred financing costs 41,564 35,655
Escrow deposits 550 50
Prepaid expenses 2,759 2,829
Marketable securities 40,944 17,688
Other 21,714 26,478
--------- ---------
206,763 159,085
Less - Accumulated amortization (60,466) (48,519)
--------- ---------
$ 146,297 $ 110,566
========= =========
</TABLE>
7. NOTES PAYABLE AND BORROWINGS UNDER CREDIT FACILITY:
The following is a summary of the Operating Partnership's debt financing at
December 31, 1999 and 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
SECURED DEBT
BankBoston, N.A. ("BankBoston") Term Note I(1) due October 30, 2001, bears
interest at the Eurodollar rate plus 325 basis points or the Base Rate (as
defined in the Term Note Agreement) plus 100 basis points (at December 31, 1999,
the rate was 9.38% based on the Eurodollar rate) with a three-year interest-only
term, secured by Greenway I and IA, Four Westlake Park, Washington Harbour, Bank
One Tower, Frost Bank Plaza, Central Park Plaza, 3333 Lee Parkway, The Addison,
and Reverchon Plaza Office Properties with a combined book value of $416,852...... $ 320,000 $ 260,000
AEGON Note(2) due July 1, 2009, bears interest at 7.53% with monthly principal
and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule, secured by the
Funding III, IV and V Properties with a combined book value of $234,700........... 278,392 --
LaSalle Note I(3) bears interest at 7.83% with an initial seven-year
interest-only term (through August 2002), followed by principal amortization
based on a 25-year amortization schedule through maturity in August 2027,
secured by the Funding I Properties with a combined book value of $292,385........ 239,000 239,000
BankBoston Term Note II(4) due August 13, 2003, bears interest at the 30-day
LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points (at December 31, 1999, the interest rate was
9.38%) with a four-year interest only term, secured by equity interests in
Funding I and II valued at approximately $200,000................................. 200,000 --
JP Morgan Mortgage Note(5) due October 1, 2016, bears interest at a fixed rate
of 8.31% with a two-year interest-only term, secured by the Houston Center
mixed-use Office Property complex with a combined book value of $245,865.......... 200,000 --
</TABLE>
81
<PAGE> 83
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Merrill Lynch Promissory Note (subsequently sold in 1999 to Salomon Brothers
Realty Corp.) due September 14, 1999, bears interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 200
basis points (at December 31, 1998, the rate was 7.06%) with an interest-only
term, secured by the Houston Center mixed-use Property complex with a book value
of $271,479 at December 31, 1998................................................... -- 184,299
LaSalle Note II(6) bears interest at 7.79% with an initial seven-year
interest-only term (through March 2003), followed by principal amortization
based on a 25-year amortization schedule through maturity in March 2028, secured
by the Funding II Properties with a combined book value of $302,881................ 161,000 161,000
LaSalle Note III(7) due July 1999, bears interest at 30-day LIBOR plus a
weighted average rate of 2.135% (at December 31, 1998 the rate was 7.20%,
subject to a rate cap of 10%) with an interest-only term, secured by the Funding
III, IV and V Properties with a combined book value of $242,096 at December, 31,
1998............................................................................... -- 115,000
SFT Whole Loans, Inc. ("SFT") Note due September 30, 2001, bears interest at
30-day LIBOR plus an average rate of 1.75% (at December 31, 1999, the rate was
7.36%) with an interest-only term, secured by the Fountain Place Office Property
with a combined book value of $112,794............................................. 97,123 97,123
CIGNA Note due December 2002, bears interest at 7.47% with an interest-only
term, secured by the MCI Tower Office Property and Denver Marriott City Center
Hotel Property with a combined book value of $97,116............................... 63,500 63,500
Metropolitan Life Note II(8) due December 2002, bears interest at 6.93% with
monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization
schedule, secured by the Energy Centre Office Property with a combined book
value of $56,731................................................................... 43,623 44,364
Metropolitan Life Note III(9) due December 1999, bears interest at 7.74% with an
interest-only term, secured by the Datran Center Office Property with a combined
book value of $70,076 at December 31, 1998......................................... -- 40,000
Metropolitan Life Note V(9) due December 2005, bears interest at 8.49% with
monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization
schedule, secured by the Datran Center Office Property with a combined book
value of $70,374................................................................... 39,700 --
Northwestern Life Note due January 2003, bears interest at 7.65% with an
interest-only term, secured by the 301 Congress Avenue Office Property with a
combined book value of $45,275..................................................... 26,000 26,000
Metropolitan Life Note I due September 2001, bears interest at 8.88% with
monthly principal and interest payments based on a 20-year amortization
schedule, secured by five of The Woodlands Office Properties with a combined
book value of $14,677.............................................................. 11,388 11,777
Nomura Funding VI Note(10) bears interest at 10.07% with monthly principal and
interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule through maturity in
July 2020, secured by the Funding VI Property with a combined book value of
$ 33,418........................................................................... 8,480 8,586
</TABLE>
82
<PAGE> 84
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31,
1999 1998
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Metropolitan Life Note IV due December 1999, bears interest at 7.11% with
monthly principal and interest payments based on a 15-year amortization
schedule, secured by the Datran Center Office Property with a book value of
$70,076 at December 31, 1998.................................................... -- 6,752
Rigney Promissory Note due June 2012, bears interest at 8.50% with quarterly
principal and interest payments based on a 15-year amortization schedule,
secured by a parcel of land with a value of $16,886............................. 723 755
UNSECURED DEBT
Line of Credit with BankBoston ("Credit Facility")(1) (see description of Credit
Facility below)................................................................. 510,000 660,000
2007 Notes(11) bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.50% with a ten-year
interest-only term, due September 2007.......................................... 250,000 250,000
2002 Notes(11) bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.00% with a five-year
interest-only term, due September 2002.......................................... 150,000 150,000
---------- ----------
Total Notes Payable......................................................... $2,598,929 $2,318,156
========== ==========
</TABLE>
- ----------
(1) On February 4, 2000, the BankBoston Term Note I and the Credit Facility
were repaid and retired primarily with the proceeds of a new facility ("New
Facility"), an $850,000 secured, variable-rate facility from UBS described
in greater detail below.
(2) The outstanding principal balance at maturity of this note will be
approximately $223,000.
(3) In August 2007, the interest rate increases, and the Operating Partnership
is required to remit, in addition to the monthly debt service payment,
excess property cash flow, as defined, to be applied first against
principal until the note is paid in full and thereafter, against accrued
excess interest, as defined. It is the Operating Partnership's intention to
repay the note in full at such time (August 2007) by making a final payment
of approximately $220,000.
(4) The Operating Partnership entered into the BankBoston Term Note II on
September 14, 1999. This loan is secured by partnership interests in two
pools of underleveraged assets. The proceeds were used to repay the
$150,000 BankBoston Bridge Loan and to repay $50,000 of outstanding
indebtedness under the BankBoston Credit Facility. On February 1, 2000, the
Operating Partnership renegotiated certain terms and covenants under this
note. As a result, the interest rate on the facility increased to 30-day
LIBOR plus 400 basis points. The Operating Partnership entered into a
four-year $200,000 cash flow hedge agreement effective September 1, 1999
with Salomon Brothers Holding Company, Inc. in a separate transaction
related to the BankBoston Term Note II. See Note 8. Cash Flow Hedges.
(5) On September 14, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the $184,299
Salomon Brothers Realty Corp. Note with this note. The additional proceeds
of $15,701 were used to pay indebtedness outstanding under the BankBoston
Credit Facility. The refinancing did not include the Four Seasons Hotel
that had served as partial collateral for the Salomon Brothers Realty Corp.
Note. At the end of seven years (October 2006), the loan reprices based on
current interest rates at this time. It is the Operating Partnership's
intention to repay the note in full at such time (October 2006) by making a
final payment of approximately $179,000.
(6) In March 2006, the interest rate increases, and the Operating Partnership
is required to remit, in addition to the monthly debt service payment,
excess property cash flow, as defined, to be applied first against
principal until the note is paid in full and thereafter, against accrued
excess interest, as defined. It is the Operating Partnership's intention to
repay the note in full at such time (March 2006) by making a final payment
of approximately $154,000.
(7) In June, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the Greenway Plaza
Office Property complex with a $280,000 AEGON Note, which was used to repay
this note.
(8) In the first quarter of 2000, this note was paid off with proceeds from the
disposition of the Energy Centre Office Property.
(9) On December 1, 1999, the Operating Partnership refinanced the Metropolitan
Life Note III with the Metropolitan Life Note V.
(10) The Operating Partnership has the option to defease the note, by purchasing
Treasury obligations in an amount sufficient to pay the note, without
penalty. In July 2010, the interest rate due under the note will change to
a 10-year Treasury yield plus 500 basis points or, if the Operating
Partnership so elects, it may repay the note without penalty at that date.
(11) The notes were issued in an offering registered with the SEC.
83
<PAGE> 85
Below are the aggregate principal amounts due as of December 31, 1999
under the Credit Facility and other indebtedness of the Operating Partnership by
year. Scheduled principal installments and amounts due at maturity are included.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SECURED UNSECURED TOTAL
---------- ---------- ----------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $ 5,913 $ 510,000 $ 515,913
2001 444,975 -- 444,975
2002 105,560 150,000 255,560
2003 315,515 -- 315,515
2004 53,129 -- 53,129
Thereafter 763,837 250,000 1,013,837
---------- ---------- ----------
$1,688,929 $ 910,000 $2,598,929
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
The Operating Partnership had approximately $515,913 of secured and
unsecured debt that was scheduled to expire during 2000, consisting primarily of
$510,000 due under the Credit Facility with BankBoston, which was scheduled to
expire in June 2000. In addition, the Operating Partnership had approximately
$444,975 of secured debt scheduled to expire in 2001, consisting primarily of
$320,000 due under the BankBoston Term Note I. Effective January 31, 2000, the
Operating Partnership entered into the New Facility, a $850,000 secured,
variable-rate facility from UBS which refinanced and extended these debt
maturities described in greater detail below.
CREDIT FACILITY
At December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership's borrowing capacity
under the Credit Facility was limited to $560,000, of which $510,000 was
outstanding. The interest rate on advances under the Credit Facility was the
Eurodollar rate plus 137 basis points. As of December 31, 1999, the weighted
average interest rate was 7.65%. The Credit Facility was unsecured and was
scheduled to expire in June 2000. The Credit Facility required the Operating
Partnership to maintain compliance with a number of customary financial and
other covenants on an ongoing basis, including leverage ratios based on book
value and debt service coverage ratios, limitations on additional secured and
total indebtedness and distributions, limitations on additional investments and
the incurrence of additional liens, restrictions on real estate development
activity and a minimum net worth requirement. The Operating Partnership was in
compliance with the financial covenants related to the Credit Facility for the
December 31, 1999 reporting period. During the first quarter of 2000, the Credit
Facility was repaid and retired primarily with the proceeds of the New Facility
described below.
NEW FACILITY
On February 4, 2000, the Operating Partnership repaid and retired the
Credit Facility and the BankBoston Term Note I primarily with the proceeds of
the New Facility, a new $850,000 secured, variable-rate facility fully
underwritten and funded by UBS. The New Facility is comprised of three tranches:
a three-year $300,000 revolving line of credit (the "UBS Line of Credit"), a
$275,000 three-year term loan ("UBS Term Loan I") and a $275,000 four-year term
loan ("UBS Term Loan II"). Borrowings under the UBS Line of Credit, the UBS Term
Loan I and the UBS Term Loan II at March 24, 2000 were approximately $258,527,
$257,213 and $257,213, respectively. The UBS Line of Credit and the UBS Term
Loan I bear interest at LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The UBS Term Loan II bears
interest at LIBOR plus 275 basis points. The New Facility is secured by 41
Office Properties and four Hotel Properties. The Operating Partnership has also
entered into a cash flow hedge agreement related to a portion of the New
Facility in a separate transaction subsequent to December 31, 1999, which is
intended to mitigate its exposure to variable-rate debt. See Note 8. Cash Flow
Hedges for a description of this agreement.
8. CASH FLOW HEDGES
The Operating Partnership does not use derivative financial instruments
for trading purposes, but occasionally utilizes them to manage exposure to
variable rate debt. The Operating Partnership accounts for its derivative
instruments under SFAS No. 133, which was adopted in the third quarter of 1999.
84
<PAGE> 86
In September 1999, the Operating Partnership entered into a four-year cash
flow hedge agreement with Salomon Brothers Holding Company, Inc. ("Salomon").
The cash flow hedge agreement is designated as such because it is intended to
mitigate the variability of cash flows. On a monthly basis, the cash flow hedge
is marked to fair value and the cash flow hedge's gain or loss is reported in
earnings when the interest on the underlying debt affects earnings. The cash
flow hedge agreement has a notional amount of $200,000, relating to the
BankBoston Term Note II. Pursuant to this agreement, the Operating Partnership
will pay Salomon on a quarterly basis at 6.183% fixed interest rate and Salomon
will pay the Operating Partnership a floating 90-day LIBOR rate based on the
same quarterly reset dates. The underlying note, which was originally issued at
a floating interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 325 basis points, was effectively
converted to a fixed weighted average interest rate of 9.43% through maturity.
Effective February 1, 2000, the Operating Partnership renegotiated certain terms
and covenants under the BankBoston Term Note II. At such time, the interest rate
on the facility increased to 30-day LIBOR plus 400 basis points, and
consequently increased the effective fixed weighted average interest rate to
10.18% through maturity. As of December 31, 1999, the cash flow hedge agreement
resulted in $344 of additional interest expense.
Effective February 4, 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into a
three-year cash flow hedge agreement with Fleet Boston Financial, for a notional
amount of $200,000, relating to a portion of the New Facility. As a result,
$200,000 of the amount under the note, which was originally issued at a floating
interest rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points, was effectively converted to a
fixed weighted average interest rate of 9.61% through maturity.
9. RENTALS UNDER OPERATING LEASES:
The Operating Partnership receives rental income from the leasing of Office
Property, Retail Property, Hotel Property and Behavioral Healthcare Property
space under operating leases. For noncancelable operating leases that were in
effect as of December 31, 1999 for Properties owned as of March 24, 2000, future
minimum rentals (base rents) during the next five years and thereafter
(excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses for Office and Retail
Properties) are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OFFICE AND BEHAVIORAL
RETAIL HOTEL HEALTHCARE COMBINED
PROPERTIES PROPERTIES PROPERTIES PROPERTIES
---------------- ---------------- ----------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2000 $ 424,937 $ 44,036 $ -- $ 468,973
2001 387,864 46,961 -- 434,825
2002 323,476 48,161 -- 371,637
2003 267,603 48,561 -- 316,164
2004 199,964 49,618 -- 249,582
Thereafter 580,040 107,552 -- 687,592
---------------- ---------------- ----------------- -----------------
$ 2,183,884 $ 344,889 $ -- $ 2,528,773
================ ================ ================= =================
</TABLE>
For purposes of this Note, the Operating Partnership has assumed that it
will not receive any future minimum rental revenues from the Behavioral
Healthcare Properties, due to the status of the bankruptcy proceedings of CBHS.
See Note 18. CBHS.
Generally, the Office and Retail Property leases also require that tenants
reimburse the Operating Partnership for increases in operating expenses above
operating expenses during the base year of the tenants lease. These amounts
totaled $92,865, $78,708, and $42,385 for the years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively. These increases are generally payable in equal
installments throughout the year, based on estimated increases, with any
differences adjusted at year end based upon actual expenses.
The Operating Partnership recognized percentage rental income from the
Hotel Properties of approximately $19,648, $13,848, and $9,678 for the years
ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further
discussion of revenue recognition, and Note 4. Segment Reporting, for further
discussion of significant tenants. 10.
85
<PAGE> 87
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
LEASE COMMITMENTS
The Operating Partnership has 14 Properties located on land that is subject
to long-term ground leases which expire between 2015 and 2080. The Operating
Partnership also leases parking spaces in a parking garage adjacent to one of
its Properties pursuant to a lease expiring in 2021. Lease expense associated
with these leases during each of the three years ended December 31, 1999, 1998,
and 1997 was $2,642, $2,482, and $1,247, respectively. Future minimum lease
payments due under such leases as of December 31, 1999, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LEASES
COMMITMENTS
-------------------
<S> <C>
2000 $ 2,275
2001 2,258
2002 2,185
2003 2,191
2004 2,195
Thereafter 99,008
-------------------
$ 110,112
===================
</TABLE>
CONTINGENCIES
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
All of the Properties have been subjected to Phase I environmental
assessments, and some properties have been subjected to Phase II soil and ground
water sampling as part of the Phase I assessments. Such assessments have not
revealed, nor is management aware of, any environmental liabilities that
management believes would have a material adverse effect on the financial
position or results of operations of the Operating Partnership.
11. STOCK AND UNIT BASED COMPENSATION PLANS:
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has two stock incentive plans, the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan
(the "1995 Plan") and the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the "1994 Plan"). In June
1996, the shareholders amended the 1995 Plan, which increased the maximum number
of options and/or restricted shares that the Company may grant to 2,850,000
shares. The maximum aggregate number of shares available for grant under the
1995 Plan increases automatically on January 1 of each year by an amount equal
to 8.5% of the increase in the number of common shares and units outstanding
since January 1 of the preceding year, subject to certain adjustment provisions.
As of January 1, 2000, the number of shares the Company may grant under the 1995
Plan is 9,650,505. Under the 1995 Plan, the Company had granted, net of
forfeitures, options and restricted shares of 7,275,494 and 23,718 respectively,
through December 31, 1999. Due to the approval of the 1995 Plan, additional
options and restricted shares will no longer be granted under the 1994 Plan.
Under the 1994 Plan, the Company had granted, net of forfeitures, 2,509,800
options and no restricted shares. Under both Plans, options are granted at a
price not less than the market value of the shares on the date of grant and
expire ten years from the date of grant. The options that have been granted
under the 1995 Plan vest over five years, with the exception of 500,000 options
that vest over two years, 250,000 options that vest over three and a half years
and 60,000 options that vest six months from the initial date of grant. The
options that have been granted under the 1994 Plan vest over periods ranging
from one to five years.
86
<PAGE> 88
A summary of the status of the Company's 1994 and 1995 Plans as of December
31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and changes during the years then ended is presented in
the table below:
STOCK OPTIONS PLANS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
OPTIONS TO OPTIONS TO OPTIONS TO
ACQUIRE WTD. AVG. ACQUIRE WTD. AVG. ACQUIRE WTD. AVG.
SHARES EXERCISE SHARES EXERCISE SHARES EXERCISE
(000) PRICE (000) PRICE (000) PRICE
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding as of January 1, 6,967 $ 21 4,943 $ 16 4,681 $ 15
Granted 3,489 16 2,728 32 485 28
Exercised (2,900) 13 (52) 18 (134) 14
Forfeited (895) 30 (652) 29 (89) 21
Expired - - - - - -
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Outstanding/Wtd. Avg. as of December 31, 6,661 $ 21 6,967 $ 21 4,943 $ 16
---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------
Exercisable/Wtd. Avg. as of December 31, 1,721 $ 24 3,727 $ 15 3,285 $ 14
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about the options outstanding
and exercisable at December 31, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
NUMBER WTD. AVG. YEARS NUMBER
OUTSTANDING REMAINING EXERCISABLE
RANGE OF AT 12/31/99 BEFORE WTD. AVG. AT 12/31/99 WTD. AVG.
EXERCISE PRICES (000) EXPIRATION EXERCISE PRICE (000) EXERCISE PRICE
- ----------------------- --------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$11 to 18 4,210 8.9 years $ 16 674 $ 16
$19 to 27 974 7.9 23 391 23
$28 to 39 1,477 8.2 33 656 32
--------------- --------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
$11 to 39 6,661 8.6 years $ 21 1,721 $ 24
=============== =============== ============== ============== ==============
</TABLE>
UNIT PLANS
The Operating Partnership has two unit incentive plans, the 1995 Unit
Incentive Plan (the "1995 Unit Plan") and the 1996 Unit Incentive Plan (the
"1996 Unit Plan"). The 1995 Unit Plan is designed to reward persons who are not
trust managers, officers or 10% shareholders of the Company. An aggregate of
100,000 common shares are reserved for issuance upon the exchange of 50,000
units available for issuance to employees and advisors under the 1995 Unit Plan.
As of December 31, 1999, an aggregate of 7,012 units had been distributed under
the 1995 Unit Plan. The 1995 Unit Plan does not provide for the grant of
options. There was no activity in the 1995 Unit Plans in 1999. The 1996 Unit
Plan provides for the grant of options to acquire up to 2,000,000 units, all of
which were granted. The unit options granted under the 1996 Unit Plan were
priced at fair market value on the date of grant, vest over seven years, and
expire ten years from the date of grant. Pursuant to the terms of the unit
options granted under the 1996 Unit Plan, because the fair market value of the
Company's common shares equaled or exceeded $25 for each of ten consecutive
trading days, the vesting of an aggregate of 500,000 units was accelerated and
such units became immediately exercisable in 1996. Under the 1996 Unit Plan,
each unit that may be purchased is exchangeable, as a result of shareholder
approval in June 1997, for two common shares. In June 1999, Gerald Haddock
forfeited approximately 322,000 units as part of his resignation as an officer
and director of the Company and Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd. These
options are available for grant to participants. In addition, the 1996 Unit Plan
was amended in November 1999, to provide for an additional grant of 100,000 unit
options, available from such forfeitures, and to allow such unit options to vest
over five years.
87
<PAGE> 89
A summary of the status of the Operating Partnership's 1996 Unit Plan as of
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, and changes during the years then ended is
presented in the table below (assumes each unit is exchanged for two common
shares):
1996 UNIT INCENTIVE OPTION PLAN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
SHARES SHARES SHARES
UNDERLYING WTD. AVG. UNDERLYING WTD. AVG. UNDERLYING WTD. AVG.
UNIT OPTIONS EXERCISE UNIT OPTIONS EXERCISE UNIT OPTIONS EXERCISE
(000) PRICE (000) PRICE (000) PRICE
------------ ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding as of January 1, 4,000 $ 18 4,000 $ 18 4,000 $ 18
Granted 200 16 -- -- -- --
Exercised (1,143) 18 -- -- -- --
Forfeited (643) 18 -- -- -- --
Expired -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Outstanding/Wtd. Avg. as of December 31, 2,414 $ 17 4,000 $ 18 4,000 $ 18
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Exercisable/Wtd. Avg. as of December 31, 1,143 $ 18 1,857 $ 18 1,429 $ 18
</TABLE>
STOCK OPTION AND UNIT PLANS
The Operating Partnership applies APB No. 25 in accounting for options
granted pursuant to the 1995 Plan, the 1994 Plan and the 1996 Unit Plan
(collectively, the "Plans"). Accordingly, no compensation cost has been
recognized for the Plans. Had compensation cost for the Plans been determined
based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the Plans,
consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Operating Partnership's net income and
earnings per unit would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
As reported Pro forma As reported Pro forma As reported Pro forma
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Income (Loss) available
to partners $ (6,168) $ (11,725) $ 166,695 $ 161,226 $ 133,590 $ 130,691
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Unit $ (0.09) $ (0.17) $ 2.52 $ 2.43 $ 2.50 $ 2.45
Diluted Earnings per Unit $ (0.09) $ (0.17) $ 2.42 $ 2.34 $ 2.40 $ 2.36
</TABLE>
Because SFAS No. 123 was not required to be applied to options granted
prior to January 1, 1995, the resulting compensation cost may not be
representative of what is to be expected in future years.
At December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, the weighted average fair value of
unit options granted was $5.60, $10.02, and $13.04, respectively. The fair value
of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model using the following expected weighted average assumptions
in the calculation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Life of options 10 years 10 years 10 years
Risk-free interest rates 8.0% 7.0% 6.7%
Dividend yields 12.0% 7.0% 4.0%
Stock price volatility 27.0% 26.1% 19.3%
</TABLE>
88
<PAGE> 90
PARTNERS' CAPITAL:
In connection with its issuances of securities, the Company contributes the
net proceeds of these issuances to the Operating Partnership for its use in
exchange for an increase in its limited partner interest in the Operating
Partnership. Each unit may be exchanged for either two common shares or, at the
election of the Company, cash equal to the fair market value of the two common
shares at the time of the exchange. When a unitholder exchanges a unit, the
Company's percentage interest in the Operating Partnership increases. During the
years ended December 31, 1999, there were 226,914 units exchanged for 453,828
common shares of the Company.
PREFERRED SHARE OFFERINGS
On February 19, 1998, the Company completed an offering (the "February 1998
Preferred Offering") of 8,000,000 shares of 6 3/4% Series A convertible
cumulative preferred shares (the "Series A Preferred Shares") with a liquidation
preference of $25 per share. Series A Preferred Shares are convertible at any
time, in whole or in part, at the option of the holders thereof into common
shares of the Company at a conversion price of $40.86 per common share
(equivalent to a conversion rate of .6119 common share per Series A Preferred
Share based on the original offering price), subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances. In connection with the February 1998 Preferred Offering, the
Operating Partnership created a comparable class of preferred units (the "Class
A Units") which are owned by the Company. Net proceeds contributed to the
Operating Partnership from the February 1998 Preferred Offering after
underwriting discounts of $8,000 and other offering costs of $750 were
approximately $191,250, resulting in a corresponding increase in the Company's
limited partner interest. The net proceeds from the February 1998 Preferred
Offering were used by the Operating Partnership to repay borrowings under the
BankBoston Credit Facility. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Shares and Class
A Units are cumulative from the date of original issuance and are payable
quarterly in arrears commencing on May 15, 1998. The dividend represents an
annualized dividend of $1.69 per share and Class A Unit, or $.42 per share and
Class A Unit per quarter.
On June 30, 1998, the Company completed an offering (the June 1998
Preferred Offering") of 6,948,734 Series B convertible preferred shares at
$32.38 per share (the "Series B Preferred Shares") for aggregate total offering
proceeds of approximately $225,000 to The Prudential Insurance Company of
America and certain of its affiliates. In connection with the June 1998
Preferred Offering, the Operating Partnership created a comparable class of
preferred units (the "Class B Units") which are owned by the Company. The net
proceeds, contributed to the Operating Partnership from the offering were
approximately $224,750, resulting in a corresponding increase in the Company's
limited partner interest. The net proceeds from the June 1998 Preferred Offering
were used by the Operating Partnership to repay approximately $170,000 of
short-term indebtedness and to make an indirect investment of approximately
$55,900 in five additional Temperature-Controlled Logistics Properties. On
October 7, 1998, the Series B Preferred Shares became convertible at any time,
at the option of the holder. On November 30, 1998, upon the election of the
holder, the Series B Preferred Shares were converted into 8,400,582 of the
Company's common shares at a conversion rate which was calculated by comparing
the investment return produced by the common shares of the Company and an
investment return of a portfolio of equity REIT's as computed by NAREIT. The
Class B Units were simultaneously converted into an additional limited partner
interest held by the Company.
COMMON SHARE OFFERING
On April 23, 1998, the Company completed an offering of 1,365,138 common
shares at $32.27 per share (the "April 1998 Unit Investment Trust Offering") to
Merrill Lynch & Co. Net proceeds to the Company contributed to the Operating
Partnership from the April 1998 Unit Investment Trust Offering were
approximately $43,959, resulting in a corresponding increase in the Company's
limited partner interest. The net proceeds were used to reduce borrowings
outstanding under the BankBoston Credit Facility.
89
<PAGE> 91
On March 25, 1999, the Company issued 12,356 additional common shares to
the former holder of the Series B Preferred Shares, settling a dispute regarding
the calculation of the conversion rate used in the conversion of the Series B
Preferred Shares into the Company's common shares on November 30, 1998. In
connection with the issuance of additional common shares, the Company received
an additional limited partner interest, which resulted in a reduction of the
Operating Partnership's net income per unit and net book value per unit.
FORWARD SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
On August 12, 1997, the Company entered into two transactions with
affiliates of the predecessor of UBS AG ("UBS"). In one transaction, the Company
sold 4,700,000 common shares to UBS for approximately $148,000 and the Company
received approximately $145,000 in net proceeds. In the other transaction, the
Company entered into a forward share purchase agreement (the "Forward Share
Purchase Agreement") with UBS. On August 11, 1998, the Company paid a fee of
approximately $3,000 to UBS in connection with the exercise by the Company and
UBS of the right to extend the term of the Forward Share Purchase Agreement
until August 12, 1999.
On June 30, 1999, the Company settled the forward share purchase agreement
(the "Forward Share Purchase Agreement") with affiliates of the predecessor of
UBS. As settlement of the Forward Share Purchase Agreement, the Company made a
cash payment of approximately $149,000 to UBS in exchange for the return by UBS
to the Company of 7,299,760 common shares.
The number of common shares returned to the Company is equal to the
4,700,000 common shares originally issued to UBS plus 2,599,760 common shares
subsequently issued by the Company, because of a decline in its stock price. In
connection with the issuance of additional common shares, the Company received
additional limited partner interest, which resulted in a reduction of the
Operating Partnership's net income per unit and net book value per unit. The
additional shares were issued as collateral for the Company's obligation to
purchase 4,700,000 common shares from UBS by August 12, 1999. The settlement
price was calculated based on the gross proceeds the Company received from the
original issuance of 4,700,000 common shares to UBS, plus a forward accretion
component equal to 90-day LIBOR plus 75 basis points, minus an adjustment for
the Company's distributions paid to UBS. The forward accretion component
represented a guaranteed rate of return to UBS.
EQUITY SWAP AGREEMENT
On December 12, 1997, the Company entered into two transactions with
Merrill Lynch. In one transaction, pursuant to which the Company obtained
additional equity capital through the issuance of common shares, the Company
sold 5,375,000 common shares at $38.125 per share to Merrill Lynch for $204,900
($199,900 in net proceeds) (the "Merrill Lynch Offering"). The net proceeds
contributed to the Partnership from the Merrill Lynch Offering were used to
repay borrowings under the BankBoston Credit Facility. In the other transaction,
the Company entered into an equity swap agreement (the "Swap Agreement") with
Merrill Lynch relating to 5,375,000 common shares (the "Settlement Shares"),
pursuant to which Merrill Lynch would sell, as directed by the Company on or
before December 12, 1998, a sufficient number of common shares to achieve net
sales proceeds equal to the market value of the Settlement Shares on December
12, 1997, plus a forward accretion component, minus an adjustment for the
Company's distribution rate.
On February 20, 1998, and June 25, 1998, the Company issued 525,000 common
shares and 759,254 common shares, respectively, to Merrill Lynch, pursuant to
the terms of the Swap Agreement, as a result of the decline in market price of
the common shares from December 12, 1997 through February 12, 1998 and June 12,
1998, respectively. The issuance of these common shares did not have a material
impact on the Company's net income per common share or net book value per common
share or the Operating Partnership's net income per unit or net book value per
unit.
Effective September 30, 1998, the Company terminated the Swap Agreement
with Merrill Lynch. As of that date, the Company repurchased the 6,659,254
common shares that Merrill Lynch held and terminated the additional contingent
share obligation provided for under the Swap Agreement by the Operating
Partnership issuing a $209,299 promissory note (the "Merrill Lynch Note") due
December 14, 1998. The Merrill Lynch Note, which provided for interest at the
rate of 75 basis points above 30-day LIBOR, is secured by a first mortgage lien
on the Houston Center mixed-use Property complex. On December 14, 1998, the
Company and Merrill Lynch modified the Merrill Lynch Note. In connection with
the modification, (i) the Operating Partnership made a payment of $25,000 of
principal, (ii) the term of the Merrill Lynch Note was extended to September
14, 1999, and (iii) the interest rate was increased to an initial rate of
200 basis points above 30-day LIBOR. In connection with this extension, the
Operating Partnership paid an extension fee of $1,800. On September 14, 1999,
this note was refinanced with the JP Morgan Mortgage Note.
90
<PAGE> 92
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On November 5, 1999, the Company's Board of Trust Managers authorized the
repurchase of a portion of its outstanding common shares from time to time in
the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in an amount not
to exceed $500,000. The proposed repurchases will be subject to prevailing
market conditions and other considerations. The repurchase of common shares by
the Company would decrease the Company's limited partner interest, which would
result in an increase of net income per unit and net book value per unit.
The Company expects the share repurchase program to be funded through a
combination of asset sales and financing arrangements, which, in some cases, may
be secured by the repurchased shares. The amount of shares that the Company
actually will purchase will be determined from time to time, in its reasonable
judgment, based on market conditions and the availability of funds, among other
factors. There can be no assurance that any number of shares actually will be
purchased within any particular time period.
SHARE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
On November 19, 1999, the Company entered into an agreement with UBS to
repurchase a portion of its common shares from UBS. As of December 31, 1999, the
Company was obligated to repurchase 4,789,580 common shares, or approximately
$84,100 of the Company's common shares. The agreement was amended on January 4,
2000, increasing the number of common shares the Company was obligated to
repurchase from UBS by January 4, 2001 to approximately 5,800,000 common shares,
or approximately $102,000 of the Company's common shares (as amended, the "Share
Repurchase Agreement"). The price the Company will pay for the common shares
(the "Settlement Price") will be calculated based on the average cost of the
common shares purchased by UBS in connection with the Share Repurchase Agreement
plus 30-day LIBOR plus 250 basis points, minus an adjustment for the Company's
distributions during the term of the Share Repurchase Agreement. The guaranteed
rate of return under the agreement is equal to 30-day LIBOR plus 250 basis
points.
The Company may settle the Share Repurchase Agreement in cash or common
shares. If the Company fulfills its settlement obligations in cash, the
Operating Partnership will repurchase a portion of the Company's limited partner
interest for an amount approximately equal to the cash required to settle the
Company's obligations under the Share Repurchase Agreement. In the event that
the Company elects to fulfill the Share Repurchase Agreement in common shares,
UBS will sell the common shares on behalf of the Company on the open market. If,
as a result of a decrease in the market price of the common shares, the number
of common shares required to be sold to achieve the Settlement Price exceeds the
number of common shares purchased by UBS in connection with the agreement, the
Company will deliver additional cash or common shares to UBS. The issuance of
additional common shares would increase the Company's limited partner interest,
which would result in a reduction of the Operating Partnership's net income per
unit and net book value per unit. If the Company elects to fulfill the Share
Repurchase Agreement in common shares, and the market price of the common shares
is greater than the Settlement Price, UBS will return a portion of the common
shares that it purchased in the open market to the Company. If UBS returns
common shares to the Company, the Operating Partnership will repurchase a
portion of the Company's limited partner interest in the Operating Partnership,
which will result in an increase in net income per unit and net book value per
unit.
If the common share price on the NYSE falls below the Settlement Price
calculated approximately every two weeks, the Company is required to remit cash
collateral to UBS equal to the product of the number of common shares purchased
by UBS and 115% of the difference between the Settlement Price and the closing
price of the common shares as reported on the NYSE. If the Company elects to
settle the Share Repurchase Agreement in cash, any cash collateral held by UBS
will be used to "pay-down" the Settlement Price. If the Company elects to settle
the Share Repurchase Agreement in common shares, UBS will release all claims to
any cash collateral they hold at that time. As of December 31, 1999, no cash
collateral was due to UBS. On February 18, 2000, the Company posted cash
collateral of $8,700 to UBS, as a result of a decline in the common share price.
DISTRIBUTIONS
Units
The distribution to partners paid during the year ended December 31, 1999,
was $299,878.
The distribution to partners paid during the year ended December 31, 1998,
was $220,618.
91
<PAGE> 93
Following is the income tax status of dividends paid by the Company on
common shares and distributions paid by the Operating Partnership on equivalent
units during the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 to common shareholders
and unitholders:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Ordinary income 50.1% 58.8%
Capital gain 2.0% 5.6%
Return of capital 47.9% 35.6%
</TABLE>
Preferred Units
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership paid cash
distributions on its Series A Preferred Units of $13,500 to the Company, which
was the sole holder of record.
For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Operating Partnership paid cash
distributions on its Series A Preferred Units of $11,500 to the Company, which
was the sole holder of record.
Following is the income tax status of dividends paid by the Company and
distributions paid by the Operating Partnership during the years ended December
31, 1999 and 1998 to preferred shareholders and unitholders:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Ordinary income 96.4% 94.4%
Capital gain 3.6% 5.6%
</TABLE>
13. SETTLEMENT OF MERGER DISPUTE:
STATION CASINOS, INC. ("STATION")
As of April 14, 1999, the Company and Station entered into a settlement
agreement for the mutual settlement and release of all claims between the
Company and Station arising out of the agreement and plan of merger between the
Company and Station, which the Company terminated in August 1998. As part of the
settlement agreement, the Company paid $15,000 to Station on April 22, 1999.
14. MINORITY INTEREST:
Minority interest represents joint ventures interests held by third
parties.
92
<PAGE> 94
15. RELATED PARTY INVESTMENT:
As of December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership, upon the approval of
the independent members of the Board of Trust Managers of the Company,
contributed approximately $22,500 of a $25,000 commitment to DBL Holdings, Inc.
("DBL"). The Operating Partnership has a 95% non-voting interest in DBL.
The contribution was used by DBL to invest in DBL-ABC, Inc., which, in
turn, acquired a limited partnership interest of 12.5% in the G2 Opportunity
Fund, LP ("G2"). G2 was formed for the purpose of investing in commercial
mortgage backed securities and is managed by an entity that is owned equally by
Goff Moore Strategic Partners, LP ("GMSP") and GMAC Commercial Mortgage
Corporation. John Goff, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trust Managers and
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and member of the Strategic
Planning Committee of Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd., and Darla Moore, who
is married to Richard Rainwater, Chairman of the Board of Trust Managers of the
Company and member of the Strategic Planning Committee of Crescent Real Estate
Equities, Ltd., each own 50% of the entity that ultimately controls GMSP. Mr.
Rainwater is a limited partner of GMSP. At December 31, 1999, DBL's primary
holdings consisted of the 12.5% investment in G2.
16. FORMATION AND CAPITALIZATION OF COI
In April 1997, the Company established a new Delaware corporation, COI. All
of the outstanding common stock of COI, valued at $0.99 per share, was
distributed, effective June 12, 1997, to those persons who were limited partners
of the Operating Partnership or shareholders of the Company on May 30, 1997, in
a spin-off.
COI was formed to become a lessee and operator of various assets to be
acquired by the Company and to perform the "Intercompany Agreement" between COI
and the Company, pursuant to which each has agreed to provide the other with
rights to participate in certain transactions. As a result of the formation of
COI and the execution of the "Intercompany Agreement", persons who own equity
interests in both the Operating Partnership and COI have the opportunity to
participate in the benefits of both the real estate investments of the Operating
Partnership (including ownership of real estate assets) and the lease of certain
of such assets and the ownership of other non-real estate assets by COI. The
certificate of incorporation, as amended and restated, of COI generally
prohibits COI, for so long as the Intercompany Agreement remains in effect, from
engaging in activities or making investments that a REIT could make, unless the
Company was first given the opportunity, but elected not to pursue such
activities or investments.
In connection with the formation and capitalization of COI, the Operating
Partnership provided to COI approximately $50,000 in the form of cash
contributions and loans to be used by COI to acquire certain assets. The
Operating Partnership also made available to COI a line of credit to be used by
COI to fulfill certain ongoing obligations associated with these assets. As of
December 31, 1999, COI had $36,700 and $22,824 outstanding under the line of
credit and term loans, respectively, with the Operating Partnership.
93
<PAGE> 95
17. DISPOSITIONS:
Office & Retail Segment
For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Operating Partnership recognized
an impairment loss of approximately $16,800 on one of the Office Properties held
for disposition, which was sold during the first quarter of 2000. The impairment
loss represented the difference between the carrying value of the Office
Property and the sales price less costs of the sale. As of March 24, 2000, the
Operating Partnership completed the sale of six wholly-owned Office Properties,
which were included in the group of ten Office Properties held for disposition
at December 31, 1999 and were being actively marketed for sale. The sales
generated approximately $146,600 of net proceeds. The proceeds were primarily
used to pay down variable-rate debt. Excluding the impairment loss on one of the
six Office Properties held for disposition at December 31, 1999, the Operating
Partnership recognized a net gain of approximately $13,300 in the first quarter
of 2000, related to the sales of the other five Office Properties that were
classified as held for disposition at December 31, 1999. In addition, the
Operating Partnership has entered into contracts relating to the sale of two
additional Office Properties.
Behavioral Healthcare Segment
The Operating Partnership is actively marketing the Non-Core Properties for
sale. The Non-Core Properties were classified as held for disposition at
December 31, 1999, and depreciation expense has not been recognized since
November 10, 1999. From January 1 through March 24, 2000, the Operating
Partnership completed the sale of 11 Non-Core Properties. The sales generated
approximately $34,900 in net proceeds. The proceeds were primarily used to pay
down variable-rate debt. The Operating Partnership has also entered into
contracts or letters of intent to sell an additional six Non-Core Properties.
See Note 18. CBHS.
Other
On October 27, 1999, the Operating Partnership completed the sale of its
non-core equity and debt interests in the Dallas Mavericks, interest in the new
Dallas sports arena development and surrounding mixed-use development projects,
and certain promissory notes related to the Dallas Mavericks for approximately
$89,000 in cash. In connection with the sale, the Operating Partnership
recognized a net loss of approximately $700. The proceeds were primarily used to
pay down variable-rate debt.
The Woodlands Commercial Properties Company, L.P., owned by the Operating
Partnership and Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund II, L.P., has been actively
marketing for sale certain property assets (multi-family, retail and
office/venture tech portfolios) located in The Woodlands. As of December 31,
1999, the multi-family portfolio had been sold, generating net proceeds of
approximately $28,800, of which the Operating Partnership's portion was
approximately $12,200. The sale generated a net gain of approximately $11,600,
of which the Operating Partnership's portion was approximately $4,900. The sale
of the retail portfolio, including the Operating Partnership's four Retail
Properties located in The Woodlands, closed on January 5, 2000, and generated
approximately $49,800 of net proceeds, of which the Operating Partnership's
portion was approximately $37,300. The Woodlands Retail Properties were sold at
a net gain of approximately $9,000, of which the Operating Partnership's portion
was approximately $7,700. All of the proceeds were primarily used to pay down
variable-rate debt.
18. CBHS:
BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE SEGMENT
During the year ended December 31,1999, the Operating Partnership received
cash rental payments of approximately $35,300 from CBHS. CBHS's business has
been negatively affected by many factors, including adverse industry conditions.
During 1999, CBHS failed to perform in accordance with its operating budget.
In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Operating Partnership, COI, Magellan and
CBHS completed a recapitalization of CBHS. Pursuant to the recapitalization,
Magellan transferred its remaining hospital-based assets to CBHS, canceled its
accrued franchise fees and terminated the franchise agreements, pursuant to
which Magellan had
94
<PAGE> 96
provided certain services to CBHS in exchange for certain franchise fees. The
Operating Partnership also deferred the monthly rental payments due from CBHS
for November and December 1999 and amended its master lease with CBHS to provide
a mechanism to terminate the master lease as to the Non-Core Properties, and
agreed that, upon each sale by the Operating Partnership of a Non-Core Property,
the monthly minimum rent due from CBHS under the master lease would be reduced
by a specified percentage of the net proceeds of such sale. In addition, the
Operating Partnership obtained appraisals of the underlying behavioral
healthcare real estate assets completed in November 1999.
In connection with the above events, the following financial statement
charges were made with respect to the Operating Partnership's investment in the
Behavioral Healthcare Properties for the year ended December 31, 1999:
o CBHS rent was reflected on a cash basis beginning in the third quarter of
1999 and CBHS rent will continue to be reflected on a cash basis going
forward;
o The Operating Partnership wrote-off the rent that was deferred according to
the CBHS lease agreement from the commencement of the lease in June of 1997
through June 30, 1999. The balance written-off totaled $25,600;
o The Operating Partnership wrote-down its behavioral healthcare real estate
assets by approximately $103,800, to a book value of $245,000;
o The Operating Partnership recorded approximately $15,000 of additional
expense to be used by CBHS as working capital; and
o The Operating Partnership has not recorded depreciation expense on the
Non-Core Properties since November 1999, when such Properties were classified
as held for disposition.
As of December 31, 1999, the Behavioral Healthcare Segment consisted of 88
Behavioral Healthcare Properties in 24 states, all of which were leased to CBHS
and its subsidiaries under a triple-net master lease. Of these 88 Behavioral
Healthcare Properties, 51 are designated as Non-Core Properties and the
remaining 37 are designated as Core Properties. The 51 Non-Core Properties,
which are the Properties at which CBHS has ceased operations or is planning to
cease operations, were being actively marketed for sale at December 31, 1999.
On February 16, 2000, CBHS and all of its subsidiaries that are subject to
the master lease with the Operating Partnership filed voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware. CBHS has stated in its bankruptcy petitions that it intends to sell
all of the ongoing businesses of CBHS and its subsidiaries by mid-May of 2000 or
develop an appropriate liquidation procedure if the sales have not taken place
by that time.
Effective February 29, 2000, the Non-Core Properties were terminated from
the master lease, although the aggregate rent due under the master lease was not
reduced as a result, except as described above with respect to sales of Non-Core
Properties. See Note 17. Dispositions for a description of recent dispositions
of Non-Core Properties. The Core Properties remain subject to the master lease.
Payment and treatment of rent for the Behavioral Healthcare Properties is
subject to a rent stipulation agreed to by certain of the parties involved in
the CBHS bankruptcy proceeding.
95
<PAGE> 97
19. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999
-------------------------------------------------------
March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
------------ ------------ ---------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 185,747 $ 192,397 $ 185,525 $ 182,610
Income before minority interests 39,660 61,313 (113,316) 25,686
Minority interests (245) (239) (253) (374)
Net income (loss) applicable to partners
- basic 33,888 55,534 (116,944) 21,354
- diluted 33,888 55,534 (116,944) 21,354
Per share data:
Basic Earnings (loss) Per Unit 0.49 0.80 (1.76) 0.37
Diluted Earnings (loss) Per Unit 0.48 0.79 (1.76) 0.37
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998
-------------------------------------------------------
March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 161,149 $ 169,104 $ 179,793 $ 188,297
Income before minority interests 47,154 48,278 32,795 54,983
Minority interests (400) (407) (199) (493)
Net income applicable to partners
- basic 45,179 44,496 29,221 47,799
- diluted 45,179 44,496 29,221 51,115
Per share data:
Basic Earnings Per Unit 0.69 0.67 0.44 0.72
Diluted Earnings Per Unit 0.67 0.64 0.42 0.69
</TABLE>
96
<PAGE> 98
SCHEDULE III
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1999
(dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Costs
Capitalized Impairment
Subsequent to to Carrying Gross Amount at Which
Initial Costs Acquisition Value Carried at Close of Period
--------------------- ---------------- ------------- --------------------------
Land, Buildings, Buildings, Buildings,
Improvements, Improvements, Improvements,
Furniture, Furniture, Furniture,
Buildings and Fixtures and Fixtures and Fixtures and
Description Land Improvements Equipment Equipment Land Equipment
- -------------------------------------------- ------ ------------- --------------- ------------- ------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
The Crescent Office Towers, Dallas, TX $6,723 $153,383 $ 77,016 $ -- $6,723 $ 230,399
UPR Plaza, Fort Worth, TX 1,375 66,649 35,444 -- 1,375 102,093
The Citadel, Denver, CO 1,803 17,259 3,928 -- 1,803 21,187
MacArthur Center I & II, Irving, TX 704 17,247 2,984 -- 880 20,055
Las Colinas Plaza, Irving, TX 2,576 7,125 1,744 -- 2,581 8,864
Caltex House, Irving, TX 2,200 48,744 1,870 -- 2,200 50,614
Liberty Plaza I & II, Dallas, TX 1,650 15,956 495 -- 1,650 16,451
Regency Plaza One, Denver, CO 950 31,797 1,704 -- 950 33,501
Waterside Commons, Irving, TX 3,650 20,135 1,985 -- 3,650 22,120
The Avallon, Austin, TX 475 11,207 52 -- 475 11,259
Two Renaissance Square, Phoenix, AZ -- 54,412 6,308 -- -- 60,720
Stanford Corporate Centre, Dallas, TX -- 16,493 1,426 -- -- 17,919
Hyatt Regency Beaver Creek, Avon, CO 10,882 40,789 9,562 -- 10,882 50,351
The Aberdeen, Dallas, TX 850 25,895 322 -- 850 26,217
Barton Oaks Plaza One, Austin, TX 900 8,207 1,435 -- 900 9,642
12404 Park Central, Dallas, TX 1,604 14,504 4,846 -- 1,604 19,350
MCI Tower, Denver, CO -- 56,593 708 -- -- 57,301
Denver Marriott City Center, Denver, CO -- 50,364 3,966 -- -- 54,330
The Woodlands Office Properties, Houston, TX 12,007 35,865 4,911 -- 12,204 40,579
Spectrum Center, Dallas, TX 2,000 41,096 10,460 -- 5,125 48,431
Ptarmigan Place, Denver, CO 3,145 28,815 5,039 -- 3,145 33,854
6225 North 24th Street, Phoenix, AZ 719 6,566 3,182 -- 719 9,748
Briargate Office and Research --
Center, Colorado Springs, CO 2,000 18,044 940 -- 2,000 18,984
Albuquerque Plaza, Albuquerque, NM -- 36,667 1,996 -- -- 38,663
Hyatt Regency Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM -- 32,241 2,449 -- -- 34,690
3333 Lee Parkway, Dallas, TX 1,450 13,177 3,699 -- 1,468 16,858
301 Congress Avenue, Austin, TX 2,000 41,735 6,314 -- 2,000 48,049
Central Park Plaza, Omaha, NE(2) 2,514 23,236 113 -- 2,514 23,349
<CAPTION>
Life on Which
Depreciation in
Latest Income
Accumulated Date of Acquisition Statement Is
Description Total Depreciation Construction Date Computed
- -------------------------------------------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
The Crescent Office Towers, Dallas, TX $237,122 $ (147,037) 1985 -- (1)
UPR Plaza, Fort Worth, TX 103,468 (40,171) 1982 1990 (1)
The Citadel, Denver, CO 22,990 (13,902) 1987 1987 (1)
MacArthur Center I & II, Irving, TX 20,935 (6,470) 1982/1986 1993 (1)
Las Colinas Plaza, Irving, TX 11,445 (3,823) 1989 1989 (1)
Caltex House, Irving, TX 52,814 (7,557) 1982 1994 (1)
Liberty Plaza I & II, Dallas, TX 18,101 (2,279) 1981/1986 1994 (1)
Regency Plaza One, Denver, CO 34,451 (4,884) 1985 1994 (1)
Waterside Commons, Irving, TX 25,770 (3,772) 1986 1994 (1)
The Avallon, Austin, TX 11,734 (1,461) 1986 1994 (1)
Two Renaissance Square, Phoenix, AZ 60,720 (9,694) 1990 1994 (1)
Stanford Corporate Centre, Dallas, TX 17,919 (3,004) 1985 1995 (1)
Hyatt Regency Beaver Creek, Avon, CO 61,233 (5,812) 1989 1995 (1)
The Aberdeen, Dallas, TX 27,067 (4,247) 1986 1995 (1)
Barton Oaks Plaza One, Austin, TX 10,542 (1,519) 1986 1995 (1)
12404 Park Central, Dallas, TX 20,954 (2,332) 1987 1995 (1)
MCI Tower, Denver, CO 57,301 (6,438) 1982 1995 (1)
Denver Marriott City Center, Denver, CO 54,330 (8,077) 1982 1995 (1)
The Woodlands Office Properties, Houston, TX 52,783 (9,560) 1980-1993 1995 (1)
Spectrum Center, Dallas, TX 53,556 (6,721) 1983 1995 (1)
Ptarmigan Place, Denver, CO 36,999 (4,453) 1984 1995 (1)
6225 North 24th Street, Phoenix, AZ 10,467 (1,450) 1981 1995 (1)
Briargate Office and Research
Center, Colorado Springs, CO 20,984 (2,234) 1988 1995 (1)
Albuquerque Plaza, Albuquerque, NM 38,663 (4,044) 1990 1995 (1)
Hyatt Regency Albuquerque, Albuquerque, NM 34,690 (4,713) 1990 1995 (1)
3333 Lee Parkway, Dallas, TX 18,326 (1,843) 1983 1996 (1)
301 Congress Avenue, Austin, TX 50,049 (4,775) 1986 1996 (1)
Central Park Plaza, Omaha, NE(2) 25,863 (2,234) 1982 1996 (1)
</TABLE>
97
<PAGE> 99
SCHEDULE III
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Costs
Capitalized Impairment
Subsequent to to Carrying Gross Amount at Which
Initial Costs Acquisition Value Carried at Close of Period
--------------------- ---------------- ------------- --------------------------
Land, Buildings, Buildings, Buildings,
Improvements, Improvements, Improvements,
Furniture, Furniture, Furniture,
Buildings and Fixtures and Fixtures and Fixtures and
Description Land Improvements Equipment Equipment Land Equipment
- -------------------------------------------- ------ ------------- --------------- ------------- ------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Canyon Ranch, Tucson, AZ 14,500 43,038 5,079 -- 17,846 44,771
The Woodlands Office Properties, Houston, TX 2,393 8,523 -- -- 2,393 8,523
Three Westlake Park, Houston, TX 2,920 26,512 735 -- 2,920 27,247
1615 Poydras, New Orleans, LA(2) -- 37,087 2,279 -- 1,104 38,262
Greenway Plaza Office Portfolio, Houston, TX 27,204 184,765 59,226 -- 27,204 243,991
Chancellor Park, San Diego, CA 8,028 23,430 (5,688) -- 2,328 23,442
The Woodlands Retail Properties, Houston, TX 11,340 18,948 1,613 -- 11,360 20,541
Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa, Sonoma, CA 10,000 44,922 25,803 -- 10,000 70,725
Canyon Ranch, Lenox, MA 4,200 25,218 7,639 -- 4,200 32,857
160 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA -- 35,656 2,624 -- -- 38,280
Greenway I & IA, Richardson, TX 1,701 15,312 458 -- 1,701 15,770
Bank One Tower, Austin, TX 3,879 35,431 1,622 -- 3,879 37,053
Frost Bank Plaza, Austin, TX -- 36,019 4,617 -- -- 40,636
Greenway II, Richardson, TX 1,823 16,421 144 -- 1,823 16,565
55 Madison, Denver, CO 1,451 13,253 548 -- 1,451 13,801
44 Cook, Denver, CO 1,451 13,253 1,105 -- 1,451 14,358
AT&T Building, Denver, CO(2) 1,366 12,471 1,667 -- 1,366 14,138
Trammell Crow Center, Dallas, TX 25,029 137,320 8,589 -- 25,029 145,909
The Addison, Dallas, TX 1,990 17,998 606 -- 1,990 18,604
Addison Tower, Dallas, TX 830 7,701 373 -- 830 8,074
The Amberton, Dallas, TX(2) 1,050 9,634 1,038 -- 1,050 10,672
Cedar Springs Plaza, Dallas, TX 700 6,549 776 -- 700 7,325
Concourse Office Park, Dallas, TX(2) 800 7,449 620 -- 800 8,069
The Meridian, Dallas, TX(2) 1,500 13,613 933 -- 1,500 14,546
One Preston Park, Dallas, TX(2) 180 1,694 290 -- 180 1,984
Palidades Central I, Dallas, TX 1,300 11,797 643 -- 1,300 12,440
Palidades Central II, Dallas, TX 2,100 19,176 650 -- 2,100 19,826
5050 Quorum, Dallas, TX 898 8,243 317 -- 898 8,560
Reverchon Plaza, Dallas, TX 2,850 26,302 1,126 -- 2,850 27,428
Stemmons Place, Dallas, TX -- 37,537 950 -- -- 38,487
Valley Centre, Dallas, TX(2) 421 3,873 454 -- 421 4,327
Walnut Green, Dallas, TX(2) 980 8,923 833 -- 980 9,756
Carter-Crowley Land/Multi-Family, Dallas, TX 46,900 3,600 (29,439) -- 21,061 --
Behavioral Healthcare Facilities(3)(4) 89,000 301,269 (2,751) (103,773) 85,805 197,940
Houston Center, Houston, TX 52,504 224,041 5,620 -- 47,388 234,777
Four Seasons Hotel, Houston, TX 5,569 45,138 6,273 -- 5,569 51,411
<CAPTION>
Life on Which
Depreciation in
Latest Income
Accumulated Date of Acquisition Statement Is
Description Total Depreciation Construction Date Computed
- -------------------------------------------- -------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Canyon Ranch, Tucson, AZ 62,617 (3,662) 1980 1996 (1)
The Woodlands Office Properties, Houston, TX 10,916 (1,026) 1995-1996 1996 (1)
Three Westlake Park, Houston, TX 30,167 (2,267) 1983 1996 (1)
1615 Poydras, New Orleans, LA(2) 39,366 (2,825) 1984 1996 (1)
Greenway Plaza Office Portfolio, Houston, TX 271,195 (26,946) 1969-1982 1996 (1)
Chancellor Park, San Diego, CA 25,770 (1,972) 1988 1996 (1)
The Woodlands Retail Properties, Houston, TX 31,901 (3,537) 1984 1996 (1)
Sonoma Mission Inn & Spa, Sonoma, CA 80,725 (5,945) 1927 1996 (1)
Canyon Ranch, Lenox, MA 37,057 (3,639) 1989 1996 (1)
160 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA 38,280 (3,420) 1984 1996 (1)
Greenway I & IA, Richardson, TX 17,471 (1,186) 1983 1996 (1)
Bank One Tower, Austin, TX 40,932 (2,970) 1974 1996 (1)
Frost Bank Plaza, Austin, TX 40,636 (3,301) 1984 1996 (1)
Greenway II, Richardson, TX 18,388 (1,231) 1985 1997 (1)
55 Madison, Denver, CO 15,252 (1,121) 1982 1997 (1)
44 Cook, Denver, CO 15,809 (1,207) 1984 1997 (1)
AT&T Building, Denver, CO(2) 15,504 (1,462) 1982 1997 (1)
Trammell Crow Center, Dallas, TX 170,938 (10,550) 1984 1997 (1)
The Addison, Dallas, TX 20,594 (1,213) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Addison Tower, Dallas, TX 8,904 (665) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
The Amberton, Dallas, TX(2) 11,722 (563) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Cedar Springs Plaza, Dallas, TX 8,025 (621) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Concourse Office Park, Dallas, TX(2) 8,869 (654) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
The Meridian, Dallas, TX(2) 16,046 (760) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
One Preston Park, Dallas, TX(2) 2,164 (121) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Palidades Central I, Dallas, TX 13,740 (880) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Palidades Central II, Dallas, TX 21,926 (1,311) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
5050 Quorum, Dallas, TX 9,458 (620) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Reverchon Plaza, Dallas, TX 30,278 (1,931) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Stemmons Place, Dallas, TX 38,487 (2,713) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Valley Centre, Dallas, TX(2) 4,748 (232) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Walnut Green, Dallas, TX(2) 10,736 (487) 1980/1986 1997 (1)
Carter-Crowley Land/Multi-Family, Dallas, TX 21,061 -- -- --
Behavioral Healthcare Facilities(3)(4) 283,745 (34,696) 1850-1992 1997 (1)
Houston Center, Houston, TX 282,165 (13,881) 1974-1983 1997 (1)
Four Seasons Hotel, Houston, TX 56,980 (4,222) 1983 1997 (1)
</TABLE>
98
<PAGE> 100
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Costs
Capitalized Impairment
Subsequent to to Carrying Gross Amount at Which
Initial Costs Acquisition Value Carried at Close of Period
--------------------- --------------- ------------- --------------------------
Land, Buildings, Buildings, Buildings,
Improvements, Improvements, Improvements,
Furniture, Furniture, Furniture,
Buildings and Fixtures and Fixtures and Fixtures and
Description Land Improvements Equipment Equipment Land Equipment
- -------------------------------------------- -------- ------------- --------------- ------------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Miami Center, Miami, FL 13,145 118,763 3,720 -- 13,145 122,483
1800 West Loop South, Houston, TX 4,165 40,857 976 -- 4,165 41,833
Fountain Place, Dallas, TX 10,364 103,212 5,242 -- 10,364 108,454
Energy Centre, New Orleans, LA(2)(5) 7,500 67,704 1,820 (16,800) 7,500 52,724
Ventana Country Inn, Big Sur, CA 2,782 26,744 3,112 -- 2,782 29,856
Avallon Phase II, Austin, TX 1,102 -- 11,377 -- 1,188 11,291
Austin Centre, Austin, TX 2,007 48,566 1,931 -- 2,007 50,497
Omni Hotel, Austin, TX 1,896 44,579 1,716 -- 1,896 46,295
Post Oak Central, Houston, TX 15,525 139,777 3,471 -- 15,525 143,248
Washington Harbor, Washington, D.C. 16,100 146,438 1,663 -- 16,100 148,101
Datran Center, Miami, FL -- 71,091 2,276 -- -- 73,367
Four Westlake Plaza, Houston, TX 3,910 79,190 213 -- 3,910 79,403
Sonoma Golf Course, Sonoma, CA 14,956 -- 1,016 -- 11,795 4,177
Plaza Park Garage 2,032 14,125 472 -- 2,032 14,597
Washington Harbor Phase II, Washington, D.C. 15,279 411 347 -- 15,322 715
Crescent Real Estate Equities L.P. -- -- 16,620 -- -- 16,620
Other 23,270 2,874 14,190 -- 29,608 10,726
-------- ---------- -------- --------- -------- ----------
Total $523,067 $3,320,648 $372,432 $(120,573) $494,514 $3,601,060
======== ========== ======== ========= ======== ==========
<CAPTION>
Life on Which
Depreciation in
Latest Income
Accumulated Date of Acquisition Statement Is
Description Total Depreciation Construction Date Computed
- -------------------------------------------- --------- ------------ ------------ ----------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Miami Center, Miami, FL 135,628 (6,673) 1983 1997 (1)
1800 West Loop South, Houston, TX 45,998 (2,368) 1982 1997 (1)
Fountain Place, Dallas, TX 118,818 (6,023) 1986 1997 (1)
Energy Centre, New Orleans, LA(2)(5) 60,224 (2,581) 1984 1997 (1)
Ventana Country Inn, Big Sur, CA 32,638 (1,792) 1975-1988 1997 (1)
Avallon Phase II, Austin, TX 12,479 (837) 1997 -- (1)
Austin Centre, Austin, TX 52,504 (1,819) 1986 1998 (1)
Omni Hotel, Austin, TX 48,191 (3,445) 1986 1998 (1)
Post Oak Central, Houston, TX 158,773 (6,444) 1974-1981 1998 (1)
Washington Harbor, Washington, D.C. 164,201 (6,750) 1986 1998 (1)
Datran Center, Miami, FL 73,367 (2,993) 1986-1992 1998 (1)
Four Westlake Plaza, Houston, TX 83,313 (2,975) 1992 1998 (1)
Sonoma Golf Course, Sonoma, CA 15,972 (353) 1929 1998 (1)
Plaza Park Garage 16,629 (78) 1998 -- (1)
Washington Harbor Phase II, Washington, D.C. 16,037 -- 1998 -- (1)
Crescent Real Estate Equities L.P. 16,620 (4,046) -- -- (1)
Other 40,334 -- -- -- (1)
---------- ---------
Total $4,095,574 $(507,520)
========== =========
</TABLE>
99
<PAGE> 101
- -------------------
(1) Depreciation of the real estate assets is calculated over the following
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method:
Building and improvements 5 to 40 years
Tenant improvements Terms of leases
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 3 to 10 years
(2) Depreciation on these Office Properties held for sale ceased from 7/1/99
through 12/31/99 (the period over which these properties were held for
sale).
(3) Depreciation on Behavioral Healthcare Properties held for sale ceased from
11/11/99 through 12/31/99 (the period over which these properties were held
for sale).
(4) Write-down on Behavioral Healthcare Properties represents adjustment to
estimated fair value.
(5) Write-down on Energy Centre represents the difference between the carrying
value of the asset and the expected selling price less costs to sell.
A summary of combined real estate investments and accumulated depreciation is as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Real estate investments:
Balance, beginning of year $ 4,129,372 $ 3,423,130 $ 1,732,626
Acquisitions -- 580,694 1,643,587
Improvements 95,210 145,409 58,634
Disposition (8,435) (19,861) (11,717)
Impairments (120,573) -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 4,095,574 $ 4,129,372 $ 3,423,130
============ ============ ============
Accumulated depreciation:
Balance, beginning of year $ 387,457 $ 278,194 $ 208,808
Depreciation 120,745 109,551 69,457
Disposition (682) (288) (71)
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance, end of year $ 507,520 $ 387,457 $ 278,194
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable.
PART III
Certain information Part III requires is omitted from the Report. The
Company will file a definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A (the "Proxy Statement") not later than 120 days after the end of
the fiscal year covered by this Report, and certain information to be included
therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those sections of the Proxy
Statement which specifically address the items set forth herein are incorporated
by reference. Such incorporation does not include the Compensation Committee
Report or the Performance Graph included in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE GENERAL PARTNER OF THE
REGISTRANT
The information this Item requires is incorporated by reference to the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC for its annual shareholders'
meeting to be held in June 2000.
100
<PAGE> 102
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information this Item requires is incorporated by reference to the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC for its annual shareholders'
meeting to be held in June 2000.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information this Item requires is incorporated by reference to the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC for its annual shareholders'
meeting to be held in June 2000.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information this Item requires is incorporated by reference to the
Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC for its annual shareholders'
meeting to be held in June 2000.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Report of Independent Public Accountants
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Consolidated Balance
Sheets at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998
and 1997.
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Consolidated
Statements of Partners' Capital for the years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997.
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998
and 1997.
Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Notes to Financial
Statements.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III - Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership
Consolidated Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation at
December 31, 1999.
All other schedules have been omitted either because they are not
applicable or because the required information has been disclosed in
the Financial Statements and related notes included in the
consolidated and combined statements.
101
<PAGE> 103
(a)(3) Exhibits
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
3.01 Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of the Registrant dated as of November 1, 1997, as amended
(filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (the "Company
1999 10-K") of Crescent Real Estate Equities Company (the
"Company") and incorporated herein by reference)
4.01 Indenture, dated as of September 22, 1997, between the
Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company of
Missouri, N.A. (filed as Exhibit No. 4.01 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-42293) of
the Registrant (the "Form S-4") and incorporated herein by
reference)
4.02 Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company (filed as
Exhibit No. 4.01 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-2905) of the Company and incorporated herein
by reference)
4.03 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company as amended (filed
as Exhibit No. 302 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1998 (the "Company 3Q
10-Q") of the Company and incorporated herein by reference)
4.04 6-5/8% Note due 2002 (filed as Exhibit No. 4.07 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 1998 (the "Company 2Q 10-Q") of the Company and
incorporated herein by reference)
4.05 7-1/8% Note due 2007 (filed as Exhibit No. 4.08 to the
Company 2Q 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
4* Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601 (6) (4) (iii), the
Registrant by this filing agrees, upon request to furnish to
the SEC a copy of other instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the Registrant
10.01 Noncompetition of Richard E. Rainwater, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997 (the "Company 1997 10-K") of the Company
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.02 Noncompetition Agreement of John C. Goff, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.03 to the
Company 1997 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.03 Employment Agreement with John C. Goff, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994, and as further amended (filed as
Exhibit 10.07 to the Company 1999 10-K and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.04 Employment Agreement of Gerald W. Haddock, as assigned to
the Registrant on May 5, 1994, and as further amended (filed
as Exhibit 10.06 to the Company 1997 10-K and incorporated
herein by reference)
</TABLE>
102
<PAGE> 104
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
10.05 Amendment No. 4 to the Haddock Employment Agreement, dated
March 10, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Form S-4 and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.06 Amendment No. 5 to the Haddock Employment Agreement, dated
March 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.09 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (the
"Company 1998 10-K") of the Company and incorporated herein
by reference )
10.07 Employment Agreement of Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr. dated as of
December 14, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.08 to the Company
1999 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.08 Form of Officers' and Trust Managers' Indemnification
Agreement as entered into between the Company and each of
its executive officers and trust managers (filed as Exhibit
No. 10.07 to the Form S-4 and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.09 Crescent Real Estate Equities Company 1994 Stock Incentive
Plan (filed as Exhibit No. 10.07 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-75188) of the Company
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.10 Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd. First Amended and
Restated 401(k) Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to
the Company 1998 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11 Second Amended and Restated 1995 Crescent Real Estate
Equities Company Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit
10.13 to the Form S-4 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12 Amended and Restated 1995 Crescent Real Estate Equities
Limited Partnership Unit Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit
99.01 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-3452) of the Company and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.13 1996 Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Unit
Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the
Company 1999 10-K and ) incorporate herein by reference
10.14 Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
June 30, 1998, among the Registrant, BankBoston, N.A. and
the other banks named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the
1998 Company 2Q 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
10.15 Intercompany Agreement, dated June 3, 1997, between the
Registrant and Crescent Operating, Inc. (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-25223) of Crescent Operating, Inc. and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.16 Agreement dated June 11, 1999 by and between Gerald Haddock,
the Company, the Registrant and Crescent Real Estate
Equities, Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 of
the Company and incorporated herein by reference)
</TABLE>
103
<PAGE> 105
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
21.01 List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)
27.01 Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith)
</TABLE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
(c) Exhibits
See Item 14(a)(3) above.
104
<PAGE> 106
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 14th day of
April, 2000.
CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Registrant)
By: CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, LTD.,
------------------------------------------
its General Partner
By: /s/ JOHN C. GOFF
------------------------------------------
John C. Goff
Chief Executive Officer and President
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacity and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ John C. Goff Chief Executive 4/14/00
------------------------------- Officer and President of CREE Ltd.
John C. Goff (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Jerry R. Crenshaw Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial 4/14/00
------------------------------- Officer of CREE Ltd.
Jerry R. Crenshaw Jr. (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
</TABLE>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS
FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT BY
REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
No annual report to security holders covering the Registrant's last fiscal
year or proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material with
respect to any annual or other meeting of security holders has been sent to
security holders or is to be furnished to security holders subsequent to the
filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.
105
<PAGE> 107
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
3.01 Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of the Registrant dated as of November 1, 1997, as amended
(filed as Exhibit 10.01 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (the "Company
1999 10-K") of Crescent Real Estate Equities Company (the
"Company") and incorporated herein by reference)
4.01 Indenture, dated as of September 22, 1997, between the
Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company of
Missouri, N.A. (filed as Exhibit No. 4.01 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-42293) of
the Registrant (the "Form S-4") and incorporated herein by
reference)
4.02 Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company (filed as
Exhibit No. 4.01 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(File No. 333-2905) of the Company and incorporated herein
by reference)
4.03 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company as amended (filed
as Exhibit No. 302 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1998 (the "Company 3Q
10-Q") of the Company and incorporated herein by reference)
4.04 6-5/8% Note due 2002 (filed as Exhibit No. 4.07 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 1998 (the "Company 2Q 10-Q") of the Company and
incorporated herein by reference)
4.05 7-1/8% Note due 2007 (filed as Exhibit No. 4.08 to the
Company 2Q 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
4* Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601 (6) (4) (iii), the
Registrant by this filing agrees, upon request to furnish to
the SEC a copy of other instruments defining the rights of
holders of long-term debt of the Registrant
10.01 Noncompetition of Richard E. Rainwater, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.02 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997 (the "Company 1997 10-K") of the Company
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.02 Noncompetition Agreement of John C. Goff, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994 (filed as Exhibit 10.03 to the
Company 1997 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.03 Employment Agreement with John C. Goff, as assigned to the
Registrant on May 5, 1994, and as further amended (filed as
Exhibit 10.07 to the Company 1999 10-K and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.04 Employment Agreement of Gerald W. Haddock, as assigned to
the Registrant on May 5, 1994, and as further amended (filed
as Exhibit 10.06 to the Company 1997 10-K and incorporated
herein by reference)
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 108
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
------ ----------------------
<S> <C>
10.05 Amendment No. 4 to the Haddock Employment Agreement, dated
March 10, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Form S-4 and
incorporated herein by reference)
10.06 Amendment No. 5 to the Haddock Employment Agreement, dated
March 1, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.09 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (the
"Company 1998 10-K") of the Company and incorporated herein
by reference )
10.07 Employment Agreement of Jerry R. Crenshaw, Jr. dated as of
December 14, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 10.08 to the Company
1999 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.08 Form of Officers' and Trust Managers' Indemnification
Agreement as entered into between the Company and each of
its executive officers and trust managers (filed as Exhibit
No. 10.07 to the Form S-4 and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.09 Crescent Real Estate Equities Company 1994 Stock Incentive
Plan (filed as Exhibit No. 10.07 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 33-75188) of the Company
and incorporated herein by reference)
10.10 Crescent Real Estate Equities, Ltd. First Amended and
Restated 401(k) Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to
the Company 1998 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11 Second Amended and Restated 1995 Crescent Real Estate
Equities Company Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit
10.13 to the Form S-4 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12 Amended and Restated 1995 Crescent Real Estate Equities
Limited Partnership Unit Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit
99.01 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-3452) of the Company and incorporated herein by
reference)
10.13 1996 Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership Unit
Incentive Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the
Company 1999 10-K and ) incorporate herein by reference
10.14 Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
June 30, 1998, among the Registrant, BankBoston, N.A. and
the other banks named therein (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the
1998 Company 2Q 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
10.15 Intercompany Agreement, dated June 3, 1997, between the
Registrant and Crescent Operating, Inc. (filed as Exhibit
10.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-25223) of Crescent Operating, Inc. and incorporated
herein by reference)
10.16 Agreement dated June 11, 1999 by and between Gerald Haddock,
the Company, the Registrant and Crescent Real Estate
Equities, Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 of
the Company and incorporated herein by reference)
21.01 List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith)
27.01 Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith)
</TABLE>
<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 21.01
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
1. CRE Management I Corp., a Delaware corporation
2. CRE Management II Corp., a Delaware corporation
3. CRE Management III Corp., a Delaware corporation
4. CRE Management IV Corp., a Delaware corporation
5. CRE Management V Corp., a Delaware corporation
6. CRE Management VI Corp., a Delaware corporation
7. CRE Management VII Corp., a Delaware corporation
8. CRE Management VIII, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
9. CRE Management IX, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
10. Crescent Real Estate Funding I, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
11. Crescent Real Estate Funding II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
12. Crescent Real Estate Funding III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
13. Crescent Real Estate Funding IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
14. Crescent Real Estate Funding V, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
15. Crescent Real Estate Funding VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
16. Crescent Real Estate Funding VII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
17. Crescent Real Estate Funding VIII, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
18. Crescent Real Estate Funding IX, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
19. CREM Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
20. Crescent Capital Funding, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
21. Crescent Funding Interest, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
22. Crescent Entertainment Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
23. Crescent Entertainment Management L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
24. CEC Management, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
25. Crescent Duddleston Hotel Partnership, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
26. CresCal Properties, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
27. CresCal Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation
28. Woodlands Office Equities - '95 Limited, a Texas limited partnership
29. Woodlands Retail Equities - '96 Limited, a Texas limited partnership
30. CresWood Development, L.L.C. - a Texas limited liability company
31. 301 Congress Avenue, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
32. Crescent/301, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
33. Crescent Commercial Realty Corp., a Delaware corporation
34. Crescent Commercial Realty Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
35. CresTex Development L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
36. G/C Waterside Associates L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
37. Crescent 1717 Main, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
38. Crescent E&M, L.L.C., a Texas limited liability company
39. Crescent Ervay & Main, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
40. Main Street Partners, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
41. Main Street Partners Management Company, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
42. Spectrum Mortgage Associates, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
43. Crescent Washington Harbour, L.L.C., a Delaware limited partnership
44. Crescent Potomac Harbour, L.L.C., a Delaware limited partnership
45. Crescent Costa Mesa, L.L.C., a Delaware limited partnership
46. Crescent Woodfield, L.L.C., a Delaware limited partnership
47. Crescent SH IX, Inc., a Delaware corporation
48. CRE Aviation Interests, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
49. Hudson Bay Partners II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
50. Hudson Bay Partners IV, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 72,102
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 111,369
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 1,179,895
<PP&E> 4,095,574
<DEPRECIATION> (507,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 4,951,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 170,980
<BONDS> 2,598,929
0
0
<COMMON> 0
<OTHER-SE> 2,181,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 4,951,420
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 746,279
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 609,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 0
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 192,033
<INCOME-PRETAX> (6,168)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (6,168)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (6,168)
<EPS-BASIC> (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.09)
</TABLE>
