<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
------------------------
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
(MARK ONE)
/X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
OR
/ / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-5305
------------------------
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
MARYLAND 94-1722214
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
ONE MONTGOMERY STREET 94104-5525
TELESIS TOWER, SUITE 2500 (Zip Code)
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
(Address of principal executive
offices)
</TABLE>
(415) 445-6530
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH
- -------------------------------------- REGISTERED
--------------------------------------
Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
Common Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM
405 OF REGULATION S-K (SECTION229.405 OF THIS CHAPTER) IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN,
AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN DEFINITIVE
PROXY OR INFORMATION STATEMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PART III OF THIS
FORM 10-K OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM 10-K. / /
At February 5, 1997, the aggregate market value of the registrant's shares
of Common Stock, $.01 par value, held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was
approximately $835,580,000. At that date 32,919,093 shares were outstanding.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
BRE Properties, Inc. (the "Company") to be filed within 120 days of December 31,
1996 (the "Proxy Statement") are incorporated by reference in Part III of this
report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In addition to historical information, certain sections of this Annual
Report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, such as those pertaining to the Company's capital resources, profitability
and portfolio performance. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and
uncertainties. The following factors, among others discussed herein, could cause
actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or
contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults or non-renewal of
leases, increased interest rates and operating costs, failure to obtain
necessary outside financing, difficulties in identifying properties to acquire
and in effecting acquisitions, failure to qualify as a real estate investment
trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, financial
market fluctuations, changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in
real property tax rates. The success of the Company also depends upon the trends
of the economy, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental
regulation, legislation, population changes and those risk factors discussed
elsewhere in this Annual Report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only
as of the date hereof. The Company assumes no obligation to update
forward-looking statements. See also the Company's reports to be filed from time
to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Company hereby amends the following Items in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C>
(1) Item 1-- Business
(2) Item 2-- Properties
(3) Item 6-- Selected Financial Data
(4) Item 7-- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(5) Item 8-- Financial Statements and Supplemental Data
(6) Item 14-- Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
CORPORATE PROFILE
BRE Properties, Inc. ("BRE" or the "Company"), formerly a Delaware
corporation that reincorporated in Maryland in March 1996, is a
self-administered equity real estate investment trust which primarily owns and
operates multifamily properties in the western United States. At December 31,
1996, BRE's multifamily portfolio consisted of 12,212 wholly owned units in
California, Nevada, Arizona, Washington and Oregon. On that date, BRE also owned
15 commercial and retail properties and held one land lease. In addition, at
December 31, 1996, BRE held limited partnership interests in two shopping
centers and one apartment community. Founded in 1970, the Company has paid 107
consecutive quarterly dividends to shareholders since it commenced operations.
On March 15, 1996, Real Estate Investment Trust of California, a California
real estate investment trust ("RCT"), merged with and into BRE (the "Merger"),
in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger
dated October 14, 1995. The Merger was treated as a purchase for accounting
purposes.
Pursuant to the Merger, BRE (i) acquired approximately $274,400,000
aggregate book value in equity investments in real estate, including 22
apartment communities (totaling approximately 3,600 units) and 18 commercial and
retail properties, (ii) assumed secured and unsecured RCT notes payable of
approximately $95,400,000, and other liabilities totaling approximately
$8,000,000, and (iii) issued 10,684,436 shares of the Company's common stock,
$.01 par value per share ("Common Stock"), valued at approximately $171,000,000
upon conversion of RCT's then outstanding shares of beneficial interest.
During 1996, in addition to the properties acquired in the Merger, the
Company (i) acquired nine apartment communities comprising 3,156 units at an
aggregate gross cost of approximately $230,000,000 and (ii) sold 14 commercial
and retail properties, and the ground lease underlying one apartment community,
at an aggregate gross sales price of approximately $108,000,000.
The key aspects of the Company's strategy include a focus on the acquisition
of multifamily properties in the western United States; an orderly disposition
of commercial and retail properties; and increased access to the capital markets
for debt and equity financing.
STRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT POLICY
BRE is a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Its long-range investment policy
emphasizes the purchase of fee ownership of both land and improvements,
primarily in multifamily communities located in the western United States. Among
other things, this policy is designed to enable management to monitor
developments in local real estate markets and to take an active role in managing
the Company's properties and improving their performance. The policy is subject
to ongoing review by the Board of Directors and may be modified in the future to
take into account changes in business or economic conditions, as circumstances
warrant.
3
<PAGE>
PORTFOLIO AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
At December 31, 1996, the Company's portfolio of income-producing real
estate included, as a percent of cost, the following investments:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF
PROPERTY TYPE PROPERTIES COST
- -------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Properties owned by the Company:
Multifamily..................................... 54(1) 87%
Commercial and retail........................... 15 13
Properties held in partnerships(2):
Multifamily..................................... 1 *
Commercial and retail........................... 2 *
----- -----
Total number of investments................. 72 100%
----- -----
----- -----
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF PERCENT OF
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION PROPERTIES COST
- -------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Properties owned by the Company:
California...................................... 42(1) 61%
Arizona......................................... 17 21
Washington...................................... 5 10
Nevada.......................................... 3 4
Oregon.......................................... 2 4
Properties held in partnerships(2):
California...................................... 1 *
Arizona......................................... 2 *
----- -----
Total number of investments................. 72 100%
----- -----
----- -----
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent.
(1) Includes one land lease.
(2) Properties held by partnerships in which the Company has a minority interest
as a limited partner.
See Items 2 and 7 of this report for a description of the Company's
individual investments and certain developments during the year with respect to
these investments. See Schedule III to the financial statements in Item 8, Real
Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, for additional information about the
portfolio, including location, costs and encumbrances.
REVENUES, OCCUPANCY AND OTHER OPERATING DATA
MULTIFAMILY
The following table reflects certain operating data for the Company's
multifamily properties for each year-end presented. In addition, the Company
acquired two properties (Talavera in Las Vegas, NV and Red Hawk Ranch in
Fremont, CA) and disposed of one land asset (Villa Serra in Cupertino, CA leased
to
4
<PAGE>
a third party) between January 1, 1997 and April 15, 1997. The amounts for "pro
forma 1996" present the 1996 results as if these properties had been acquired on
December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------- JULY 31,
1996 --------------------
PRO FORMA 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total available units............................... 13,015 12,212 5,475 5,067 2,970 1,862
Occupancy percent(1)................................ 96% 96% 93% 95% 95% 96%
Average monthly rate per unit....................... $ 758 $ 755 $ 699 $ 794 $ 792 $ 783
Total number of properties.......................... 55 53 23 21 10 7
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) For multifamily properties, portfolio occupancy is calculated by dividing
the total occupied units by the total units in the portfolio.
Apartment units are generally leased to residents for rental terms which do
not exceed one year.
COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL
The Company has embarked upon a strategic initiative to redeploy its
commercial and retail investments into multifamily assets. However, no time
frame has been established for completion of this activity and ultimate
dispositions of these assets are dependent upon offers with acceptable prices
and terms including satisfactory completion of potential buyer due diligence
procedures. Real estate is not classified as "held for sale" until it is likely,
in the opinion of management, that a property will be disposed of in the near
term, even if sales negotiations for such property are currently under way. No
properties were considered "held for sale" for this purpose as of December 31,
1996 or April 15, 1997 and therefore depreciation continues to be provided on
these assets. There can be no assurance that the Company's plan to redeploy
these investments will be successful.
The following table reflects certain operating data for the Company's
commercial and retail properties for each year-end presented. In addition, the
Company disposed of five properties (Montalvo Warehouse in Oxnard, CA, The Hub
Shopping Center in Fremont, CA, Santa Fe Springs Plaza in Santa Fe Springs, CA,
Elsinore Valley Center in Lake Elsinore, CA and Central Shopping Center in
Ventura, CA) between January 1, 1997 and April 15, 1997. The amounts for "pro
forma 1996" present the 1996 results as if these properties had been sold on
December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------- JULY 31,
1996 --------------------
PRO FORMA 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total available square feet (in thousands)........... 350 1,194 1,135 1,543 1,749 1,749
Occupancy percent(1)................................. 96% 93% 96% 69% 88% 91%
Average minimum annual rent per square foot(2)....... $ 23 $ 13 $ 11 $ 9 $ 9 $ 9
Total number of properties........................... 10 15 11 13 17 17
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) For commercial and retail properties, portfolio occupancy is calculated by
dividing the total occupied square footage by the total square footage in
the portfolio.
(2) Average minimum annual rent per square foot is calculated by dividing the
reported minimum rental income for commercial and retail properties by total
square feet. The changes in the amounts shown are due to variances in
occupancy levels and the changing composition of the properties due to
acquisitions and dispositions.
At December 31, 1996, none of the tenants in any of the commercial or retail
properties occupied 10% or more of the total rentable square footage of the
commercial and retail portfolio.
5
<PAGE>
Tenants in the commercial properties consisted generally of various smaller
enterprises and such properties included industrial, professional and medical
centers. The weighted average remaining term of such leases outstanding as of
April 15, 1997 was approximately four years (calculated based on the future
minimum lease payments) and remaining future minimum rentals totaled
$17,800,000. These leases generally provide for reimbursement of certain
expenses such as property taxes, insurance and common area costs in addition to
minimum rentals.
The two retail assets remaining in the portfolio as of April 15, 1997
consist of neighborhood shopping centers and the tenants include local markets
and cleaners, as examples. The weighted average remaining term of such leases
outstanding as of April 15, 1997 was approximately four years (calculated based
on the future minimum lease payments) and remaining future minimum rentals
totaled $9,200,000.
These leases generally provide for reimbursement of certain expenses such as
property taxes, insurance and common area costs in addition to minimum rentals
and percentage rents in excess of stipulated minimums.
INSURANCE, PROPERTY TAXES AND INCOME TAX BASIS
See Item 2 in this Report on Form 10-K/A for a description of insurance. In
the opinion of management, the properties are adequately covered by such
insurance. Property taxes on portfolio properties are assessed on asset values
based on the valuation method and tax rate used by the respective jurisdictions;
such rates ranged from approximately 1% to 2% of assessed values for 1996. The
gross carrying value of the Company's rental properties was $813,768,000 as of
December 31, 1996; at that date such assets had an underlying federal income tax
basis of approximately $693,000,000 which reflects, among other factors, the
carry over of basis on tax deferred exchanges.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had approximately 345 employees. None
of the employees is unionized.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following persons were executive officers of the Company as of December
31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AGE AT DECEMBER 31,
NAME 1996 POSITION(S)
- ---------------------- ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Frank C. McDowell 48 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jay W. Pauly 54 Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer
Byron M. Fox 57 Executive Vice President, Acquisitions and
Portfolio Strategy
LeRoy E. Carlson 51 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary
John H. Nunn 38 Senior Vice President, Property Management
</TABLE>
Mr. McDowell was appointed to his current position in June, 1995. Mr. Fox
was appointed to his current position in October, 1992. Messrs. Pauly, Carlson
and Nunn joined the Company in connection
6
<PAGE>
with the Merger in March, 1996. Set forth below is information regarding the
business experience of each of the executive officers:
From 1992 to 1995, Mr. McDowell was Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
Cardinal Realty Services, Inc. ("Cardinal"), a Columbus, Ohio-based apartment
management company and owner of multifamily housing. From 1988 to 1992, Mr.
McDowell was Senior Vice President, Head of Real Estate of First Interstate Bank
of Texas. Mr. McDowell holds a Bachelor of Science Degree and a Master of
Business Administration Degree, both from the University of Texas, Austin.
Mr. Pauly served as President and Chief Executive Officer of RCT from 1993
until the Merger in 1996. Prior to joining RCT, from 1990 to 1992 Mr. Pauly
served as First Vice President and was on the Executive Committee of Home
Savings of America ("Home Savings") and served as Chief Executive Officer of
Ahmanson Commercial Development Company, Ahmanson Residential Development
Company and Ahmanson Ranch. From 1986 to 1990, he was Senior Vice President,
Director of Real Estate Services for Home Savings, responsible for REO, Major
Loan Workouts, Asset Valuation, Premises Owned, Property Management and Leasing
and Environmental Risk Management. Prior to joining Home Savings, Mr. Pauly was
President and CEO of McFly, Inc., a company specializing in restaurant
development and hospitality industry investments. Mr. Pauly holds a Bachelor's
Degree in Industrial Engineering and a Master's Degree in Business
Administration both from Stanford University.
Mr. Fox served as a Senior Vice President of the Company from December 1987
until September 1992. From 1977 to 1987, he was Vice President and General
Manager of Dillingham Investment Corporation, a Hawaii land investment firm. Mr.
Fox holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree from Colgate University and a Master of
Business Administration Degree from Harvard Business School.
Mr. Carlson served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RCT from
1980 to 1996. Prior to joining RCT, Mr. Carlson was the Chief Financial Officer
of the William Walters Company, a large asset management company based in Los
Angeles, California. He is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State
of California. Mr. Carlson holds a Bachelor's Degree from the University of
Southern California.
Mr. Nunn served as Vice President of Property Management of RCT from 1990 to
1996. Prior to joining RCT, Mr. Nunn was a Vice President and Property Manager
for the William Walters Company from 1986 to 1990. From 1981 to 1986 Mr. Nunn
was the Property Manager for the M.F. Daily Investment Company in Camarillo,
California. Mr. Nunn holds a Bachelor's Degree from California State University
at Long Beach.
There is no family relationship among any of the Company's executive
officers or Directors.
RISK FACTORS
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Actual events, developments and results could differ
materially from those anticipated or projected in the forward-looking statements
as a result of certain factors listed below and elsewhere in this document.
However, because the Company operates in a rapidly changing environment, there
can be no assurance that the following factors include all material risks to the
Company at any given time. See "Forward-Looking Statements."
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT RISKS
GENERAL
Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. The yields
available from equity investments in real estate depend upon the amount of
revenues generated and expenses incurred. If properties do not generate revenues
sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service and
7
<PAGE>
capital expenditures, the Company's results of operations and ability to make
distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. The performance of
the economy in each of the areas in which the properties are located affects
occupancy, market rental rates and expenses and, consequently, has an impact on
the revenues from the properties and their underlying values. The financial
results of major local employers also may have an impact on the revenues and
value of certain properties.
Revenues from properties may be further adversely affected by a variety of
factors, including the general economic climate, local conditions in the areas
in which properties are located, such as oversupply of space or a reduction in
the demand for rental space, the attractiveness of the properties to residents
or users, competition from other available space, the ability of the Company to
provide adequate facilities maintenance, services and amenities, and insurance
premiums and real estate taxes. The Company's revenues would also be adversely
affected if residents or users were unable to pay rent or the Company was unable
to rent apartments or commercial properties on favorable terms. If the Company
were unable to promptly relet or renew the leases for a significant number of
apartment units or commercial properties, or if the rental rates upon such
renewal or reletting were significantly lower than expected rates, then the
Company's funds from operations would, and ability to make expected
distributions to shareholders may, be adversely affected. There is also a risk
that as leases on the properties expire, residents or users will vacate or enter
into new leases on terms that are less favorable to the Company. Operating
costs, including real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, and
mortgage payments, if any, do not, in general, decline when circumstances cause
a reduction in income from a property. If a property is mortgaged to secure
payment of indebtedness, and the Company is unable to meet its mortgage
payments, a loss could be sustained as a result of foreclosure on the property.
In addition, revenues from properties and real estate values are also affected
by such factors as applicable laws, including tax laws, interest rate levels and
the availability of financing.
In the normal course of business, the Company typically evaluates potential
acquisitions, enters into non-binding letters of intent, and may, at any time,
enter into contracts to acquire and may acquire additional properties. However,
no assurance can be given that the Company will have the financial resources to
make suitable acquisitions or that properties that satisfy the Company's
investment policies will be available for acquisition. Acquisitions of
properties entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with
expectations. Such risks may include that construction costs may exceed original
estimates, possibly making a project uneconomical, financing may not be
available on favorable terms or at all and construction and lease-up may not be
completed on schedule. Estimates of the costs of improvements to bring an
acquired property up to standards established for the market position intended
for that property may prove inaccurate. In addition, there are general real
estate investment risks associated with any new real estate investment. Although
the Company undertakes an evaluation of the physical condition of each new
investment before it is acquired, certain defects or necessary repairs may not
be detected until after the investment is acquired, which could significantly
increase the Company's total acquisition costs and which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions to
shareholders.
ILLIQUIDITY OF REAL ESTATE AND REINVESTMENT RISK
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid and, therefore, tend to
limit the ability of the Company to adjust its portfolio in response to changes
in economic or other conditions. Additionally, the Code places certain limits on
the number of properties a REIT may sell without adverse tax consequences. To
effect its current operating strategy, the Company has in the past raised, and
will seek to continue to raise additional acquisition funds, both through
outside financing and through the orderly disposition of commercial and retail
properties, and, depending upon interest rates, current acquisition
opportunities and other factors, generally to reinvest the proceeds in
multifamily properties. In this respect, in the markets the Company has targeted
for future acquisition of multifamily properties, there is considerable buying
competition from other real estate companies, many of whom may have greater
resources, experience or
8
<PAGE>
expertise than the Company. In many cases, this competition for acquisition
properties has resulted in an increase in property prices and a decrease in
property yields. Due to the relatively low capitalization rates currently
prevailing in the pricing of potential acquisitions of multifamily properties
which meet the Company's investment criteria, no assurance can be given that the
proceeds realized from the disposition of commercial and retail properties can
be reinvested to produce economic returns comparable to those being realized
from the properties disposed of, or that the Company will be able to acquire
properties meeting its investment criteria. To the extent that the Company is
unable to reinvest proceeds from the disposition of commercial and retail
properties, or if properties acquired with such proceeds produce a lower rate of
return than the properties disposed of, such results may have a material adverse
effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions to shareholders. In
addition, a delay in reinvestment of such proceeds may have a material adverse
effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions to shareholders.
The Company may seek to structure future dispositions as tax-free exchanges,
where appropriate, utilizing the nonrecognition provisions of Section 1031 of
the Code to defer income taxation on the disposition of the exchanged property.
For an exchange of such properties to qualify for tax-free treatment under
Section 1031 of the Code, certain technical requirements must be met. For
example, both the property exchanged and the property acquired must be held for
use in a trade or business or for investment, and the property acquired must be
identified within 45 days, and must be acquired within 180 days, after the
transfer of the exchanged property. If the technical requirements of Section
1031 of the Code are not met, then the exchanged property will be treated as
sold in a taxable transaction for a sales price equal to the fair market value
of the property received, in which event a distribution of cash to the
shareholders may be required to avoid a corporate-level income tax on the
resulting capital gain. Given the competition for properties meeting the
Company's investment criteria, it may be difficult for the Company to identify
suitable properties within the foregoing time frames in order to meet the
requirements of Section 1031. Even if a suitable tax-deferred exchange can be
structured, as noted above, no assurance can be given that the proceeds of any
of these dispositions will be reinvested to produce economic returns comparable
to those currently being realized from the properties which were disposed of.
COMPETITION
All of the properties currently owned by the Company are located in
developed areas. There are numerous other multifamily properties and real estate
companies, many of which have greater financial and other resources than the
Company, within the market area of each of the properties which will compete
with the Company for tenants and development and acquisition opportunities. The
number of competitive multifamily properties and real estate companies in such
areas could have a material effect on (i) the Company's ability to rent the
apartments and the rents charged and (ii) development and acquisition
opportunities. The activities of these competitors could cause the Company to
pay a higher price for a new property than it otherwise would have paid or may
prevent the Company from purchasing a desired property at all, which could have
a material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions
to shareholders.
GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION; DEPENDENCE ON WESTERN UNITED STATES REGIONS
The Company's portfolio is principally located in the San Francisco Bay
Area, San Diego, Tucson, Phoenix, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles/Orange county
metropolitan area, Sacramento and Las Vegas. The Company's performance could be
adversely affected by economic conditions in, and other factors relating to,
these geographic areas, including supply and demand for apartments in these
areas, zoning and other regulatory conditions and competition from other
properties and alternative forms of housing. In that regard, certain of these
areas (particularly the Los Angeles/Orange county and San Diego metropolitan
areas) have in the recent past experienced economic recessions and depressed
conditions in the local real estate markets. To the extent general economic or
social conditions in any of these areas deteriorate or any
9
<PAGE>
of these areas experiences natural disasters, the value of the portfolio, the
Company's results of operations and its ability to make distributions to
shareholders could be adversely affected.
RISKS OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AND ACQUISITION
Although the Company currently has no properties under development, the
Company may in the future seek to develop properties when market and economic
conditions warrant.
Real estate development involves significant risks in addition to those
involved in the ownership and operation of real estate. While the Company's
policies with respect to development activities are intended to limit some of
the risks otherwise associated with such activities, the Company nevertheless is
subject to certain risks, including lack of financing, construction delays,
budget overruns and lease-up. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a
material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions to
shareholders.
It is expected that, in the future, the Company's evaluation of real
property acquisition opportunities will be based, in part, upon the cost to
finance the acquisition and the yield expected to be derived from the ongoing
ownership of such real property. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient
capital on acceptable terms, its ability to acquire new real estate or implement
other aspects of its objectives and strategies will be impaired. In addition,
even if sufficient capital is available on reasonable terms, no assurance can be
given that the costs to maintain the property so acquired or the yields actually
derived from the property will not deviate materially from expectations.
UNINSURED LOSS; LIMITED COVERAGE
The Company carries comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and
rental loss insurance with respect to its properties with certain policy
specifications, limits and deductibles. While the Company currently carries
flood and earthquake insurance for its properties with an aggregate annual limit
of $60 million, subject to substantial deductibles, no assurance can be given
that such coverage will be available on acceptable terms or at an acceptable
cost, or at all, in the future, or if obtained, that the limits of those
policies will cover the full cost of repair or replacement of covered
properties. In addition, there may be certain extraordinary losses (such as
those resulting from civil unrest) that are not generally insured (or fully
insured against) because they are either uninsurable or not economically
insurable. Should an uninsured or underinsured loss occur to a property, the
Company could be required to use its own funds for restoration or lose all or
part of its investment in, and anticipated revenues from, the property and would
continue to be obligated on any mortgage indebtedness on the property. Any such
loss could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make
distributions to shareholders.
CHANGE IN LAWS
Increases in real estate taxes and income, service and transfer taxes cannot
always be passed through to residents or users in the form of higher rents, and
may adversely affect the Company's cash available for distribution and its
ability to make distributions to shareholders. Similarly, changes in laws
increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on
properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions, as
well as changes in laws affecting development, construction and safety
requirements, may result in significant unanticipated expenditures, which could
have a material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make
distributions to shareholders. In addition, future enactment of rent control or
rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing may reduce
rental revenues or increase operating costs.
LAWS BENEFITING DISABLED PERSONS
A number of federal, state and local laws (including the Americans with
Disabilities Act) and regulations exist that may require modifications to
existing buildings or restrict certain renovations by
10
<PAGE>
requiring improved access to such buildings by disabled persons. Legislation or
regulations adopted in the future may impose further burdens or restrictions on
the Company with respect to improved access by disabled persons. The costs of
compliance with these laws and regulations may be substantial, and limits or
restrictions on completion of certain renovations may limit implementation of
the Company's investment strategy in certain instances or reduce overall returns
on its investments, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company
and its ability to make distributions to shareholders. The Company reviews its
properties periodically to determine the level of compliance and, if necessary,
takes appropriate action to bring such properties into compliance. The Company's
management believes, based on property reviews to date, that the costs of such
compliance should not have a material adverse effect on the Company. Such
conclusions are based upon currently available information and data, and no
assurance can be given that further review and analysis of the Company's
properties, or future legal interpretations or legislative changes, will not
significantly increase the costs of compliance.
REAL ESTATE FINANCING RISKS
DEBT FINANCING AND DEBT MATURITIES
The Company is subject to the normal risks associated with debt financing,
including the risk that the Company's cash flow will be insufficient to meet
required payments of principal and interest, the risk that indebtedness on its
properties, or unsecured indebtedness, will not be able to be renewed, repaid or
refinanced when due or that the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be
as favorable as the terms of such indebtedness. If the Company were unable to
refinance its indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, the Company might be
forced to dispose of one or more of the properties on disadvantageous terms,
which might result in losses to the Company, which losses could have a material
adverse effect on the Company and its ability to make distributions to
shareholders. Furthermore, if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of
indebtedness and the Company is unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee
could foreclose upon the property, appoint a receiver and receive an assignment
of rents and leases or pursue other remedies, all with a consequent loss of
revenues and asset value to the Company. Foreclosures could also create taxable
income without accompanying cash proceeds, thereby hindering the Company's
ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements of the Code.
RISK OF RISING INTEREST RATES
The Company has incurred and expects in the future to incur indebtedness
which bears interest at a variable rate. Accordingly, increases in interest
rates would increase the Company's interest costs (to the extent that the
related indebtedness was not protected by interest rate protection
arrangements), which could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its
ability to make distributions to shareholders or cause the Company to be in
default under certain debt instruments. In addition, an increase in market
interest rates may lead holders of the Company's Common Stock to demand a higher
yield on their shares from distributions by the Company, which could adversely
affect the market price for the Common Stock.
ADDITIONAL DEBT
The Company currently funds acquisition opportunities partially through
borrowings (including its lines of credit) as well as from other sources such as
sales of non-core properties. The organizational documents of the Company do not
contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness that the Company may incur.
Accordingly, the Company could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an
increase in debt service, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company and its ability to make distributions to shareholders and in an
increased risk of default on its obligations.
11
<PAGE>
ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs
of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances in, on,
around or under such property. Such laws often impose such liability without
regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the
presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of, or failure to
remediate properly, such substances may adversely affect the owner's or
operator's ability to sell or rent the affected property or to borrow using such
property as collateral. Persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of
hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or
remediation of such substances at a disposal or treatment facility, whether or
not such facility is owned or operated by such person. Certain environmental
laws impose liability for release of asbestos-containing materials into the air,
and third parties may also seek recovery from owners or operators of real
properties for personal injury associated with asbestos-containing materials and
other hazardous or toxic substances. The operation and subsequent removal of
certain underground storage tanks are also regulated by federal and state laws.
In connection with the current or former ownership (direct or indirect),
operation, management, development and/or control of real properties, the
Company may be considered an owner or operator of such properties or as having
arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and,
therefore, may be potentially liable for removal or remediation costs, as well
as certain other costs, including governmental fines, and claims for injuries to
persons and property.
The Company's current policy is to obtain a Phase I environmental study on
each property it seeks to acquire and to proceed accordingly. No assurance can
be given, however, that the Phase I environmental studies or other environmental
studies undertaken with respect to any of the Company's current or future
properties will reveal all or the full extent of potential environmental
liabilities, that any prior owner or operator of a property did not create any
material environmental condition unknown to the Company, that a material
environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of such
properties or that environmental matters will not have a material adverse effect
on the Company and its ability to make distributions to shareholders. The
Company currently carries no insurance for environmental liabilities.
Certain environmental laws impose liability on a previous owner of property
to the extent that hazardous or toxic substances were present during the prior
ownership period. A transfer of the property does not relieve an owner of such
liability. Thus, the Company may have liability with respect to properties
previously sold by its predecessors.
PROVISIONS WHICH COULD LIMIT A CHANGE IN CONTROL OR DETER A TAKEOVER
In order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more than 50% in value
of the outstanding capital stock of the Company may be owned, actually or
constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include
certain entities). In order to protect the Company against risk of losing its
status as a REIT due to a concentration of ownership among its shareholders, the
Articles of Incorporation of the Company provide, among other things, that if
the Board of Directors determines, in good faith, that direct or indirect
ownership of the Company's stock has or may become concentrated to an extent
that would prevent the Company from qualifying as a REIT, the Board of Directors
may prevent the transfer of stock or call for redemption (by lot or other means
affecting one or more shareholders selected in the sole discretion of the Board
of Directors) of a number of shares sufficient in the opinion of the Board of
Directors to maintain or bring the direct or indirect ownership of the stock
into conformity with the requirements for maintaining REIT status. These
limitations may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of the
Company by a third party without consent of the Board of Directors.
In addition, certain other provisions contained in the Company's Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws, as well as its shareholder rights plan, may have the
effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for the
Company and may thereby inhibit a change in control of the Company. For
12
<PAGE>
example, such provisions may (i) deter tender offers for Common Stock, which
offers may be attractive to the shareholders, or (ii) deter purchases of large
blocks of Common Stock, thereby limiting the opportunity for shareholders to
receive a premium for their Common Stock over then-prevailing market prices.
TAX RISKS
TAX LIABILITIES AS A CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE TO QUALIFY AS A REIT
Although management believes that the Company is organized and is operating
so as to qualify as a REIT under the Code, no assurance can be given that the
Company has in fact operated or will be able to continue to operate in a manner
so as to qualify or remain so qualified. Qualification as a REIT involves the
application of highly technical and complex Code provisions for which there are
only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and the determination of
various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within the Company's
control. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of the
Company's taxable gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying
sources and the Company must make distributions to shareholders aggregating
annually at least 95% of its REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains).
In addition, no assurance can be given that new legislation, new regulations,
administrative interpretations or court decisions will not change the tax laws
with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences
of such qualification.
If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, the Company will be subject to
federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its
taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, unless entitled to relief under
certain statutory provisions, the Company would also be disqualified from
treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which
qualification is lost. This treatment would reduce funds available for
investment or distributions to shareholders because of the additional tax
liability to the Company for the year or years involved. In addition,
distributions to shareholders would no longer be required to be made. To the
extent that distributions to shareholders would have been made in anticipation
of qualifying as a REIT, the Company might be required to borrow funds or to
liquidate certain of its investments to pay the applicable tax.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
GENERAL
In addition to the information set forth in Item 1 and this Item 2,
information on the Company's portfolio is set forth in Schedule under Item
14(d).
The Company carries comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and
rental loss insurance with respect to its properties with certain policy
specifications, limits and deductibles, which the Company deems reasonable. In
addition, the Company currently carries flood and earthquake coverage with an
annual aggregate limit of $50,000,000 (after policy deductibles of 2% of
damages).
MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES
As reflected in the following chart, during the five years in the period
ended December 31, 1996, multifamily properties have increased as a percentage
of the Company's portfolio of income producing properties and revenues:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Percentage of portfolio at cost, as of December 31......... 87% 72% 65% 55% 46%
Percentage of total revenue, for the year ended December
31....................................................... 77% 76% 71% 51% 53%
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
During 1996, multifamily revenues as a percentage of total revenues did not
increase in proportion to the increase in the relative size of the multifamily
portfolio due to the timing of purchases of multifamily properties and the sales
of commercial properties.
COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL PROPERTIES
During 1996, BRE continued its orderly disposition of commercial and retail
properties, including commercial and retail properties acquired in the Merger.
At December 31, 1996 there were fifteen such properties (plus two held in
partnerships in which the Company is a limited partner). For additional
information regarding leases on the commercial and retail properties, see Note 3
to Notes to Financial Statements. No one resident or user accounted for more
than 10% of revenues for fiscal year 1996.
HEADQUARTERS
The Company maintains its corporate headquarters at One Montgomery Street,
Suite 2500, Telesis Tower, San Francisco, California pursuant to a sublease with
Wells Fargo Bank. The sublease has an eleven-year term, and covers 10,142
rentable square feet at annual per square foot rents which began at $23 and rise
to $34 in the tenth year of the lease. The lease term ends December 17, 1998.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data for each of the five years in the
period ended December 31, 1996 have been derived from the financial statements
of the Company which have been recast to give effect to the change in the
Company's fiscal year. See Note 2 to Notes to Financial Statements. The selected
financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and
the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
The increase in FFO from 1992 to 1993 is due to the purchase of additional
apartment communities. The 1996 results have been significantly impacted by the
Merger and numerous
14
<PAGE>
acquisitions and dispositions as discussed in "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and, therefore,
are not directly comparable to prior years.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS
Revenues............................................ $ 101,651 $ 65,387 $ 56,970 $ 49,806 $ 39,829
Net income.......................................... 89,839 22,010 24,212 20,037 28,737
Less:
Net gain on sales of investments.................. 52,825 221 1,646 506 14,199
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization..................... 13,283 7,864 7,080 6,097 4,787
Provision for investment losses................... -- 2,000 -- -- --
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Funds from operations*.............................. $ 50,297 $ 31,653 $ 29,646 $ 25,628 $ 19,325
Net cash flows generated from operating
activities........................................ $ 47,887 $ 27,068 $ 31,063 $ 24,121 $ 23,412
Net cash flows used in investing activities......... $ (132,082) $ (3,820) $ (66,740) $ (57,430) $ (27,072)
Net cash flows from financing activities............ $ 68,322 $ (11,077) $ 25,821 $ 42,216 $ (2,239)
Dividends paid...................................... $ 39,849 $ 27,596 $ 26,210 $ 23,659 $ 19,011
Weighted average number of shares outstanding....... 30,520 21,905 21,840 20,150 15,840
PER SHARE DATA
Income before gain on sales of investments.......... $ 1.21 $ 1.00 $ 1.03 $ .97 $ .92
Net gain on sales of investments.................... 1.73 .01 .08 .02 .90
----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net income.......................................... $ 2.94 $ 1.01 $ 1.11 $ .99 $ 1.82
Dividends paid...................................... $ 1.33 $ 1.26 $ 1.20 $ 1.20 $ 1.20
FINANCIAL POSITION
Total assets........................................ $ 783,714 $ 354,895 $ 343,853 $ 293,628 $ 231,477
Real estate portfolio, before depreciation.......... $ 816,389 $ 371,438 $ 373,676 $ 310,003 $ 252,239
Cash and short-term investments..................... $ 184 $ 16,057 $ 3,887 $ 13,742 $ 4,830
Long-term debt...................................... $ 311,985 $ 112,290 $ 97,169 $ 45,416 $ 80,155
Shareholders' equity................................ $ 464,114 $ 239,248 $ 243,436 $ 245,156 $ 148,164
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
*Management considers Funds from Operations ("FFO") to be an appropriate
supplemental measure of the performance of an equity REIT because it is
predicated on cash flow analyses which facilitate an understanding of the
operating performances of the Company's properties without giving effect to
non-cash items such as depreciation. FFO is defined by the National Association
of Real Estate Investment Trusts as net income (loss) (computed in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles) excluding gains or losses from
debt restructuring and sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization of
real estate assets. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating
activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
therefore should not be considered as a substitute for net income as a measure
of results of operations or for cash flow from operations as a measure of
liquidity. Additionally, the application and calculation of FFO by other REITs
may vary materially from that of the Company, and therefore the Company's FFO
and the FFO of other REITs may not be directly comparable.
15
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
BRE Properties, Inc. (the "Company") is a regionally focused,
self-administered equity real estate investment trust which primarily owns and
manages a portfolio of apartment communities in nine major markets of the
Western United States. The Company also owns a number of commercial and retail
properties. The Company's revenues consist primarily of rental income (92% of
total revenues in 1996 and 96% in each of 1995 and 1994) derived from its
portfolio of income-producing properties. Other income includes interest from
secured notes receivable and, to a lesser extent, income from partnership
investments. The policy of the Company is to emphasize cash flows from
operations rather than the realization of capital gains through property
dispositions. As dispositions of real estate assets are made, the Company
typically seeks to reinvest net proceeds from sales in income-producing real
estate.
Although the Company has embarked upon a strategic initiative to redeploy
its real estate investments into multifamily assets, no time frame has been
established for completion of this activity and ultimate dispositions of
commercial and retail assets are dependent upon offers with acceptable prices
and terms including satisfactory completion of potential buyer due diligence
procedures. For example, it is reasonably possible that the holding period for
remaining commercial and retail assets could extend well beyond one year.
Furthermore, changes to the plan are not unlikely (which would result in
extended holding periods for the existing properties) as market conditions could
result in a lack of acceptable offers and it is possible some properties could
be held indefinitely. (Real estate is not classified as "held for sale" until it
is likely, in the opinion of management, that a property will be disposed of in
the near term, even if sales negotiations for such property are currently under
way; no properties were considered "held for sale" for this purpose as of
December 31, 1996 or April 15, 1997 and therefore depreciation continues to be
provided on these assets).
The Company's strategic plan emphasizes equity investments in apartment
communities, located across Western markets, and the orderly redeployment of
retail and commercial property investments into apartment investments. Pursuant
to this strategy, the Company merged with Real Estate Investment Trust of
California on March 15, 1996. As a result of the Merger, the Company added 22
wholly owned apartment communities (totaling approximately 3,600 units) and 18
commercial and retail properties to the portfolio. The Merger also provided
increased depth in management and other resources which allowed the Company to
internalize property management during 1996.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Financial information for 1995 and 1994 has been recast to conform to the
presentation of 1996 financial information. See Note 2 to Notes to Financial
Statements. Certain statements in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although the Company
believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties, including those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
REVENUES
Total revenues (excluding net gain on sales of investments in rental
properties) were $101,651,000 in 1996 compared to $65,387,000 in 1995 and
$56,970,000 in 1994. Revenues in 1996 increased primarily as a result of the
Merger and new multifamily property acquisitions which were offset in part by
the disposition
16
<PAGE>
of certain retail and commercial properties. A summary of revenues for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% OF TOTAL % OF TOTAL % OF TOTAL
1996 TOTAL REVENUES 1995 TOTAL REVENUES 1994 TOTAL REVENUES
---------- ------------- ---------- ------------- ---------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES:
Multifamily rental....................... $ 77,834 77% $ 49,918 76% $ 40,504 71%
Commercial and retail rental............. 15,301 15 12,947 20 14,232 25
Other income............................. 8,516 8 2,522 4 2,234 4
---------- --- ---------- --- ---------- ---
Total revenue.......................... $ 101,651 100% $ 65,387 100% $ 56,970 100%
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
% CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR
-------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Multifamily rental.............................................. 56% 23% 59%
Commercial and retail rental.................................... 18% (9%) (36%)
Other income.................................................... 238% 13% (1%)
Total revenue................................................... 55% 15% 14%
</TABLE>
Multifamily rental revenues have increased in each of the last two years
primarily due to property acquisitions, including for 1996 the 22 apartment
communities acquired in the Merger and nine other direct apartment investments,
which contributed approximately $21,200,000 and $10,400,000, respectively, to
1996 revenue and were offset in part by the sale of the Westlake Village
property in 1996. Multifamily rental revenue in 1996 also benefited from an
increase in average occupancy (calculated as shown below) and an average
increase in rental rates in 1996 of approximately 4% when compared to 1995 for
properties held during both years. Multifamily rental revenue increased in 1995
as compared to 1994 primarily due to investments in a portfolio of Tucson,
Arizona apartment properties (the "Tucson Portfolio") during 1994, which were
held for the entire year in 1995. The Tucson Portfolio included seven properties
and was acquired for approximately $51,000,000; six communities were purchased
in 1994 and one in 1995.
Revenues from commercial and retail properties increased 18% in 1996 when
compared to 1995, primarily due to the 18 properties in these categories
acquired by the Company in the Merger (which properties contributed
approximately $5,500,000 in revenues during 1996), offset in part by property
sales. Revenues from commercial and retail properties decreased $1,285,000 in
1995 compared to 1994 due primarily to property sales in 1994. Commercial and
retail revenues as a percentage of total revenues have declined in each of the
last two years as a result of the Company's strategy emphasizing redeployment of
these investments into apartment communities. In addition, commercial and retail
properties in California markets experienced rental rate and occupancy weakness
for each of 1996, 1995 and 1994.
Portfolio occupancy rates as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Multifamily.............................................................. 96% 93% 95%
Commercial and retail.................................................... 93% 96% 69%
</TABLE>
For multifamily properties, portfolio occupancy is calculated by dividing
the total occupied units by the total units in the portfolio. For commercial and
retail properties, portfolio occupancy is calculated by dividing the total
occupied square footage by the total square footage in the portfolio.
17
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes, by property classification, portfolio
acquisitions and dispositions for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994 (dollar amounts are gross acquisition costs in the case of acquisitions and
gross sales prices in the case of property sales):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------ ------------
ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION SUMMARY # $ # $ # $
- --------------------------------------------- --- -------- --- ------- --- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Multifamily
Property acquisitions(1)................... 31 $446,412 2 $16,023 8 $72,240
Property dispositions(2)................... 1 58,000 -- -- -- --
Commercial and retail
Property acquisitions(3)................... 18 56,443 -- -- -- --
Property dispositions...................... 14 49,600 2 15,406 2 11,911
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Includes, for 1996, 22 properties acquired in the Merger with an aggregate
cost of $216,612,000 as determined under the purchase method of accounting.
(2) Represents sale of the Company's ground lease interest at Westlake Village
Apartments, Daly City, California.
(3) Represents, for 1996, 18 properties acquired in the Merger with an aggregate
cost of $56,443,000, as determined under the purchase method of accounting.
EXPENSES
REAL ESTATE EXPENSES
Real estate expenses for rental properties (which include maintenance and
repairs, utilities, on-site staff payroll, property taxes, insurance,
advertising and other direct operating expenses) for the year ended December 31,
1996 increased 44% to $31,030,000 from 1995 primarily due to expenses of the 40
properties acquired in the Merger and nine new multifamily property
acquisitions. Real estate expenses as a percentage of rental revenues decreased
from 34% in 1995 to 33% in 1996. Although not measurable with precision,
management believes that this decrease resulted in part from the internalization
of property management and economies of scale derived from increased
concentration of assets in the Company's markets. Real estate expenses increased
by 25% to $21,540,000 in the year ended December 31, 1995 from $17,256,000 for
the prior year due largely to the addition of the Tucson Portfolio, which was
held for the entire year in 1995.
PROVISION FOR DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
The provision for depreciation and amortization increased by $5,419,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1996 from that of 1995. The increase in 1996
resulted from properties acquired in the Merger and additional multifamily
property acquisitions, offset in part by dispositions of commercial and retail
properties. The provision for depreciation and amortization for the year ended
December 31, 1995 increased $784,000 compared to 1994 due largely to the
acquisition of the Tucson Portfolio in 1994, which resulted in expense for the
entire year of 1995 and only for a portion of the year in 1994.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $16,325,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996, up
from $7,973,000 in 1995. This increase was due primarily to interest on
indebtedness assumed in the Merger totaling $95,400,000 and interest on
subsequent borrowings on the Company's lines of credit to fund multifamily
property acquisitions. At December 31, 1996, the Company's total indebtedness
(including indebtedness assumed in the Merger) was $311,985,000. The $2,374,000
increase in 1995 interest expense over 1994 was due
18
<PAGE>
primarily to interest on borrowings in connection with the acquisition of the
Tucson Portfolio of approximately $27,939,000 for 12 months during 1995 and the
addition in 1995 of a new $12,000,000 secured loan.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative costs were $3,999,000 (3.9% of total revenues),
$4,221,000 (6.5% of total revenues) and $4,469,000 (7.8% of total revenues), for
the three years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The
decrease in 1996 compared to 1995 is primarily from reductions in costs of
administering the Company's day to day operations due to, among other things,
the reorganization of the Company's asset management staff to handle direct
property management duties which were previously handled by outside property
management firms and, to a lesser extent, improved efficiencies in operating
systems, computer systems and software upgrades. The decrease in 1995 compared
to 1994 is due largely to approximately $600,000 of legal expenses incurred in
1994 in connection with litigation regarding the Baldwin Place property which
the Company owned from 1974 to 1983, of which $570,000 was recovered in 1995
from the Company's insurance carriers, offset in part by certain non-recurring
financial advisory costs incurred in 1995 of approximately $300,000 in
connection with strategic planning issues.
PROVISION FOR POSSIBLE INVESTMENT LOSSES
During the quarter ended June 30, 1995, the Company recorded a $2,000,000
provision for possible investment losses; $1,750,000 was charged against the
investment in the Pomona Warehouse property (which was sold in the quarter ended
December 31, 1995) to reflect management's estimate of permanent impairment in
value (which impairment was based on the expected sales value). The remaining
amount was used to provide for possible losses on mortgage loans.
NET GAIN ON SALES OF INVESTMENTS IN RENTAL PROPERTIES
The net gain on sales in 1996 of approximately $52,825,000 was primarily due
to the sale of the Westlake Village leased land property (total sale price of
approximately $58,000,000) and the 525 Almanor industrial warehouse property
(total sale price of approximately $6,300,000). The net loss on sales (including
provision for possible investment losses) in 1995 of approximately $1,779,000
was due to the sale of the then-vacant Pomona Warehouse property and Irvine
Spectrum property. The net gain of approximately $1,646,000 in 1994 was due to
the sale of the Marymoor and 515 Ellis properties. All of these sales were
structured as tax-deferred exchanges, with the proceeds thereof applied toward
new investments in apartment communities. As of December 31, 1996, the Company
had gains on sales totaling approximately $121,000,000 which have been deferred
for federal and state income tax purposes since the Company's organization in
1970.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Over 75% of the Company's total revenues for 1996 were derived from
apartment properties. Due to the short-term nature of most apartment leases
(typically one year or less), the Company may seek to adjust rents to help
counter the impact of inflation upon renewal of existing leases or commencement
of new leases, although there can be no assurance that the Company will be able
to adjust rents in response to inflation. In addition, occupancy rates may also
fluctuate due to short-term leases which permit apartment residents to leave at
the end of each lease term at minimal cost to the resident.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At December 31, 1996, the Company's cash and cash equivalents totaled
$184,000, down from $16,057,000 at the end of 1995. Borrowings under the
Company's lines of credit totaled $124,000,000 at December 31, 1996, compared to
no such borrowings at December 31 of the previous year. Lines of credit are
available to pay dividends to shareholders, to fund capital improvements and
operating expenses, as
19
<PAGE>
well as to fund new acquisitions. The Company typically reduces lines of credit
with cash balances as available.
Borrowings of up to $150,000,000 are available under the Company's lines of
credit, with $26,000,000 available at December 31, 1996. The current lines of
credit expire in April 1998 as to $120,000,000 and April 1999 as to $30,000,000.
The lines of credit bear interest at prime or LIBOR plus 1.0% as to $30,000,000
and LIBOR plus 1.125% as to $120,000,000. Costs of the lines of credit are
0.125% per annum on the total commitment amount and an unuse fee of 0.125% per
annum as to amounts not outstanding on the $120,000,000 line.
Pursuant to the Merger, the Company assumed $73,000,000 of unsecured
indebtedness which bears interest at 7.44% per annum as to $55,000,000 and 7.88%
per annum as to $18,000,000. This indebtedness is to be repaid through scheduled
principal payments in the years from 2000 to 2005. At December 31, 1996, the
Company also had outstanding mortgage indebtedness of $114,985,000 at interest
rates ranging from 6.5% to 8.4%, with remaining terms of from one to 31 years.
For additional information regarding the Company's lines of credit,
unsecured notes payable and mortgage loans payable, including scheduled
principal payments over the next five years, see Notes 5 and 6 to Notes to
Financial Statements. Certain of the Company's indebtedness contains financial
covenants as to minimum net worth, interest coverage ratios, maximum secured
debt and total debt to capital, among others. The Company was in compliance with
all such covenants during the year ended December 31, 1996.
During 1996, the Company entered into an unsecured treasury lock swap
agreement in the notional amount of $50,000,000. This transaction is intended to
reduce the Company's overall exposure to interest rate changes, see Note 2 to
Notes to Financial Statements.
The Company purchased nine apartment investments for a total purchase price
of approximately $230,000,000 in 1996. These acquisitions were funded with
proceeds of property sales (totaling approximately $104,000,000 after sales
expenses during 1996) and additional borrowings under the Company's lines of
credit. The Company was committed to purchase two apartment communities totaling
803 units for approximately $85,000,000 as of December 31, 1996; one of these
properties (totaling approximately 350 units) was acquired in February 1997 for
approximately $26,000,000 using proceeds from the Company's lines of credit.
Purchase of the remaining property is subject to satisfactory completion of the
Company's due diligence investigation of the property, and there can be no
assurance that this purchase will in fact be consummated. This purchase, if
completed, is expected to close before June 30, 1997.
The Company believes that its cash flow and cash available from lines of
credit will be sufficient to meet its short-term liquidity needs during 1997,
which include normal recurring expenses, debt service requirements, budgeted
expenditures for improvements to certain properties and distributions required
to maintain the Company's REIT qualification under the Internal Revenue Code.
However, the Company anticipates that it will continue to require outside
sources of financing to meet its long-term liquidity needs, such as scheduled
debt repayments and property acquisitions.
On February 11, 1997, the Company increased its lines of credit from
$150,000,000 to $200,000,000 for a period of 180 days on terms substantially
similar to those described above. Also subsequent to December 31, 1996, the
Company filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for up to $300 million of unsecured debt securities, Common Stock,
preferred stock, depositary shares or warrants to purchase shares of Common
Stock.
DIVIDENDS
A cash dividend has been paid to shareholders each quarter since the
Company's inception in 1970. Dividends per share were $1.33 in 1996, $1.26 in
1995 and $1.20 in 1994. Total dividends paid to shareholders for the three years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $39,849,000, $27,596,000 and
$26,210,000, respectively.
20
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See the Index to Financial Statements. Such Financial Statements and
Schedules are incorporated herein by reference.
21
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements
1. Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Auditors
Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1995
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994
Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994
Notes to Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
3. See Index to Exhibits immediately following the Financial Statements.
Each of the exhibits listed is incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On October 16, 1996, the Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K relating
to its purchase of the Foster's Landing Apartments. The Registrant filed
financial statements related thereto pursuant to a Report on Form 8-K/A
filed on December 11, 1996.
On January 14, 1997, the Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K relating
to its purchase of the Promontory Point Apartments. The Registrant filed
financial statements related thereto pursuant to a Report on Form 8-K/A
filed on February 13, 1997.
(c) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits.
(d) Financial Statement Schedules
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Schedule.
22
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
/s/ LEROY E. CARLSON
--------------------------------------
LeRoy E. Carlson
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Dated: April 25, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATED
- ------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------- ----------------
<C> <S> <C>
Executive Vice President (Principal Financial
/s/ LEROY E. CARLSON and Accounting Officer) April 25, 1997
--------------------------------------
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Shareholders and Directors of
BRE Properties, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of BRE Properties, Inc. as
of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of income,
shareholders' equity, cash flows and the related financial schedule for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial
statements and the related schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and the related financial schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and the related
financial schedule are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of BRE Properties, Inc. at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related
financial schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Francisco, California
January 14, 1997
Except for Note 13, as to which the date is
February 12, 1997
24
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
ASSETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Investments in rental properties:
Multifamily............................................................................. $ 710,240 $ 267,847
Commercial and retail................................................................... 103,528 102,269
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization......................................... (49,690) (48,036)
---------- ----------
764,078 322,080
Investments in limited partnerships....................................................... 2,621 1,322
---------- ----------
Real estate portfolio................................................................... 766,699 323,402
Mortgage loans, net....................................................................... 9,716 5,727
---------- ----------
776,415 329,129
Cash and short-term investments........................................................... 184 16,057
Other assets 7,115 9,709
---------- ----------
TOTAL ASSETS.......................................................................... $ 783,714 $ 354,895
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Mortgage loans payable.................................................................... $ 114,985 $ 112,290
Unsecured notes payable................................................................... 73,000 --
Borrowings on unsecured lines of credit................................................... 124,000 --
Accounts payable and other liabilities.................................................... 7,615 3,357
---------- ----------
Total liabilities..................................................................... 319,600 115,647
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized in 1996.
No shares outstanding at December 31, 1996.............................................. -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized. Shares issued and outstanding:
32,879,741 at December 31, 1996; 21,941,730 at December 31, 1995........................ 329 219
Additional paid-in capital................................................................ 387,674 212,908
Accumulated net income in excess of cumulative dividends.................................. 76,111 26,121
---------- ----------
Total shareholders' equity............................................................ 464,114 239,248
---------- ----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY............................................ $ 783,714 $ 354,895
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements
25
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUE
Rental income:
Multifamily................................................................... $ 77,834 $ 49,918 $ 40,504
Commercial and retail......................................................... 15,301 12,947 14,232
Other income.................................................................... 8,516 2,522 2,234
---------- --------- ---------
Total revenue............................................................... 101,651 65,387 56,970
---------- --------- ---------
EXPENSES
Real estate expenses............................................................ 31,030 21,540 17,256
Provision for depreciation and amortization..................................... 13,283 7,864 7,080
Interest expense................................................................ 16,325 7,973 5,599
General and administrative...................................................... 3,999 4,221 4,469
Provision for possible investment losses........................................ -- 2,000 --
---------- --------- ---------
Total expenses.............................................................. 64,637 43,598 34,404
---------- --------- ---------
Income before net gain on sales of investments in rental properties............. 37,014 21,789 22,566
Net gain on sales of investments in rental properties........................... 52,825 221 1,646
---------- --------- ---------
NET INCOME.................................................................. $ 89,839 $ 22,010 $ 24,212
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
Net income per share:
Income before net gain on sales of investments in rental properties........... $ 1.21 $ 1.00 $ 1.03
Net gain on sales of investments in rental properties......................... $ 1.73 $ .01 $ .08
---------- --------- ---------
NET INCOME PER SHARE........................................................ $ 2.94 $ 1.01 $ 1.11
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements
26
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------- --------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income.................................................................... $ 89,839 $ 22,010 $ 24,212
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash generated by operating
activities:
Net gain on sales of investments............................................ (52,825) (221) (1,646)
Provision for depreciation and amortization................................. 13,283 7,864 7,080
Provision for possible investment losses.................................... -- 2,000 --
(Increase) decrease in other assets......................................... 1,522 (4,694) 1,225
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and other liabilities............... (3,932) 109 192
----------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows generated by operating activities.............................. 47,887 27,068 31,063
----------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property purchased.......................................................... (230,967) (16,023) (72,240)
Capital expenditures-multifamily............................................ (748) (505) (264)
Capital expenditures-commercial and retail.................................. (757) (1,662) (4,870)
Mortgage loans receivable advanced.......................................... (4,268) (1,195) (1,500)
Mortgage loans receivable repayments........................................ 279 159 223
Proceeds from sales of property, net........................................ 104,379 15,406 11,911
----------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows used in investing activities................................... (132,082) (3,820) (66,740)
----------- --------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Mortgage loans payable:
New mortgage loans.......................................................... -- 16,227 52,914
Principal payments.......................................................... (1,450) (1,107) (1,163)
Lines of credit:
Advances.................................................................... 127,300 -- --
Principal repayments........................................................ (21,500) -- --
Proceeds from grants of restricted shares and exercises of options............ 3,821 1,399 280
Dividends paid................................................................ (39,849) (27,596) (26,210)
----------- --------- ---------
Net cash flows generated by (used in) financing activities.................... 68,322 (11,077) 25,821
----------- --------- ---------
(Decrease) increase in cash and short-term investments........................ (15,873) 12,171 (9,856)
Balance at beginning of period................................................ 16,057 3,886 13,742
----------- --------- ---------
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD...................................................... $ 184 $ 16,057 $ 3,886
----------- --------- ---------
----------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements
27
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
COMMON STOCK SHARES
Balance at beginning of year.......................................... 21,941,730 21,850,966 21,832,966
Issuance of shares pursuant to merger................................. 10,684,436 -- --
Restricted shares granted and stock options exercised................. 246,451 90,764 18,000
Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan.................. 7,124 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at end of year.............................................. 32,879,741 21,941,730 21,850,966
------------ ------------ ------------
COMMON STOCK
Balance at beginning of year.......................................... $ 219 $ 219 $ 219
Issuance of shares pursuant to merger................................. 107 -- --
Restricted shares granted and stock options exercised................. 3 -- --
Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan.................. -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at end of year.............................................. 329 219 219
------------ ------------ ------------
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL
Balance at beginning of year.......................................... 212,908 211,510 211,231
Issuance of shares pursuant to merger................................. 170,948 -- --
Restricted shares granted and stock options exercised................. 3,681 1,398 279
Shares issued pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan.................. 137 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at end of year.............................................. 387,674 212,908 211,510
------------ ------------ ------------
ACCUMULATED NET INCOME IN EXCESS OF CUMULATIVE DIVIDENDS
Balance at beginning of year.......................................... 26,121 31,707 33,705
Net income for year................................................... 89,839 22,010 24,212
Cash dividends paid--$1.3295 per share for the year ended December 31,
1996; $1.26 per share for the year ended December 31, 1995 and $1.20
per share for the year ended December 31, 1994...................... (39,849) (27,596) (26,210)
------------ ------------ ------------
Balance at end of year.............................................. 76,111 26,121 31,707
------------ ------------ ------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY.......................................... $ 464,114 $ 239,248 $ 243,436
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, the tax components of
its dividends are as follows (unaudited):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ORDINARY LONG-TERM RETURN OF
INCOME CAPITAL GAIN CAPITAL
------------- --------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1996.......................................... 92% 1% 7%
December 31, 1995.......................................... 94% -- 6%
December 31, 1994.......................................... 86% 4% 10%
</TABLE>
See notes to financial statements
28
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. COMPANY
BRE Properties, Inc. ("BRE" or "the Company") is a self-administered real
estate investment trust ("REIT") which owns and operates multifamily communities
and other income producing properties in the Western United States. At December
31, 1996, BRE's portfolio consisted of 72 properties, including 53 wholly owned
multifamily communities (aggregating 12,212 units), 15 commercial and retail
properties, one land lease and three properties held in partnerships in which
BRE is a limited partner. Of these properties, 43 are located in California, 19
in Arizona, five in Washington, three in Nevada and two in Oregon. The 72
properties contain, in the aggregate, approximately 12,887,000 net rentable
square feet of improvements on approximately 866 acres of land.
MERGER WITH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA
On March 15, 1996, Real Estate Investment Trust of California ("RCT") merged
with and into BRE ("the Merger"). Following consummation of the Merger, BRE
changed its state of incorporation from Delaware to Maryland, amended the BRE
Certificate of Incorporation to authorize preferred stock, and approved the
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. The Merger was
completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan
of Merger dated October 11, 1995, as amended ("the Merger Agreement"). Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, upon the Merger, each issued and outstanding
share of beneficial interest of RCT was converted into the right to receive 1.14
shares of BRE Common Stock (.57 of a share of BRE Common Stock prior to the
stock split; see Note 2 Stock Split). The Merger was unanimously approved by the
Boards of both companies and by the requisite vote of the shareholders of both.
The Merger has been accounted for in 1996 as a purchase business combination.
Pursuant to the Merger with RCT on March 15, 1996, BRE (i) acquired
$274,400,000 aggregate book value in equity investments in real estate, (ii)
assumed secured and unsecured RCT notes payable of $95,400,000, and other
liabilities totaling $8,000,000, and (iii) issued 10,684,436 shares of Common
Stock valued at $171,000,000 for the conversion of RCT shares of beneficial
interest.
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
RENTAL PROPERTY
Rental property is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation less an
adjustment, if any, for impairment. Rental properties are evaluated for
impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the
sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted) from a rental property during
the expected holding period is less than its carrying value. Upon determination
that such impairment has occurred, rental properties are reduced to fair value.
Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives of the assets, which range from 35 to 45 years for buildings and 5 to 25
years for other property.
Development projects are generally considered placed in service as the
property becomes ready for occupancy.
During 1995, the Company recorded a $2,000,000 provision for possible
investment losses: $1,750,000 was credited against the investment in the Pomona
Warehouse property (which was sold in the quarter ended December 31, 1995) to
reflect management's estimate of permanent impairment in value (which impairment
was based on the expected sales value). The remaining amount was used to provide
for possible losses on mortgage loans.
29
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE
Real estate classified as held for sale is stated at the lower of its
carrying amount or estimated fair value less disposal costs. Depreciation is not
recorded on assets classified as held for sale.
In the normal course of business, BRE will receive offers for sale of its
properties, either solicited or unsolicited. For those offers which are
accepted, the prospective buyer will usually require a due diligence period
before consummation of the transaction. It is not unusual for matters to arise
which result in the withdrawal or rejection of the offer during this process. As
a result, real estate is not classified as "held for sale" until it is likely,
in the opinion of management, that a property will be disposed of in the near
term, even if sales negotiations for such property are currently under way. No
properties are considered "held for sale" for this purpose as of December 31,
1996 or 1995.
RENTAL EXPENSES AND CAPITALIZED COSTS
For multifamily properties, costs of replacements, such as appliances,
carpets and drapes, are expensed. Leasing commissions and tenant improvement
costs for retail and commercial properties are expensed when the lease term is
less than five years and capitalized on leases of five years or more and
amortized using the straight-line method over the lease terms, which range from
5 to 40 years. For all properties, improvements and betterments that increase
the value of the property or extend its life are capitalized.
CASH AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
BRE considers highly liquid short-term investments with initial maturities
of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Financial instruments which
potentially subject BRE to concentrations of credit risk include cash and
short-term investments. BRE places its cash deposits and temporary cash
investments with creditworthy, high-quality financial institutions. Cash and
cash equivalent balances are held with various financial institutions and may at
times exceed the applicable Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit of
$100,000.
DEFERRED COSTS
Included in other assets are costs incurred in obtaining debt financing that
are deferred and amortized over the terms of the respective debt agreements.
Related amortization expense is included in interest expense (non-cash) in the
accompanying statements of operations. Net deferred financing costs included in
Other Assets in the accompanying balance sheets are $850,000 and $758,000 as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
INCOME TAXES
BRE has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended ("the Code"). As a result, BRE will not be subject to federal
taxation at the corporate level to the extent it distributes, annually, at least
95% of its REIT taxable income, as defined by the Code, to its shareholders and
satisfies certain other requirements. In addition, the states in which BRE owns
and operates real estate properties have provisions equivalent to the federal
REIT provisions. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal or state
income taxes in the accompanying financial statements.
30
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
GAINS ON SALES OF INVESTMENTS IN RENTAL PROPERTIES
Sales are generally recorded at the close of escrow or after title has been
transferred to the buyer and after appropriate payments have been received and
other criteria have been met.
NET INCOME PER SHARE
Net income per share is based upon the simple weighted average shares
outstanding. The effect of excluding Common Stock equivalents from the
calculation is less than 3% and is not material to the financial statement
presentation. Net income per share on a fully diluted basis is presented if
dilution is greater than 3%.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair values of BRE's financial instruments, including cash and other
short-term investments, accounts receivable, mortgage loans receivable, accounts
payable, other accrued expenses, mortgage loans payable, lines of credit and
other financial instruments, approximate their carrying or contract values based
on their nature, terms, and interest rates which approximate current market
rates.
During 1996 BRE acquired real estate using proceeds from the line of credit,
which proceeds are expected to be refinanced with 10 year term debt on or about
June 30, 1997. In connection with such acquisitions and anticipated refinancing,
on August 29, 1996 BRE entered into a Treasury Lock Swap Agreement in the
notional amount of $50,000,000 with a large, credit worthy bank. BRE did not
provide any collateral for this transaction. The rate is fixed at 7.05% as
compared to the rate on a United States Government 10-Year Treasury Note on June
30, 1997. The agreement acts to effectively lock in the borrowing cost
associated with this anticipated debt issuance. The change in the value of the
treasury lock in response to interest rate changes is expected to offset any
increase or decrease in the interest rate on the anticipated issuance of debt.
Had the transaction been settled as of December 31, 1996, BRE would have been
required to pay approximately $380,000. Any future gain or loss on the swap
transaction will be deferred and will be amortized over the term of the debt as
an adjustment to its interest rate yield.
LEGAL AND OTHER GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
In 1994 the Company incurred legal expenses of approximately $600,000 in
connection with litigation regarding the Baldwin Place property which the
Company owned from 1974 to 1983; in 1995 approximately $570,000 of such costs
were recovered and credited to general and administrative expenses.
Additionally, non-recurring financial advisory costs of approximately $300,000
were incurred in 1995 in connection with strategic planning issues.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
31
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
RECLASSIFICATION AND CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years' financial
statements to conform to the presentation of the current period financial
statements.
Commencing August 1, 1995, BRE began reallocating a portion of its salaries,
employee benefits and other personnel costs from general and administrative to
real estate expense to better reflect the functional nature of the underlying
activity. While this reclassification does not change BRE's net income or funds
from operations, such allocation reduces reported general and administrative
expenses and increases real estate expense by an equal amount. Management
believes that this allocation is consistent with industry practices and will
provide better matching of the revenue generated by the properties and the
expenses required to generate that revenue.
BRE has elected to recast the full comparative periods pursuant to the
change made in May 1996 in the fiscal year to a calendar year end effective
December 31, 1995. Therefore, amounts presented reflect the financial position
and results of operations from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996 and the
comparative period for the prior years. Certain reclassifications have been made
to the 1995 and 1994 financial statements to conform to the presentation of the
1996 financial statements.
STOCK SPLIT
On May 20, 1996, the Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split
effected in the form of a stock dividend to shareholders of record on June 7,
1996, payable on June 27, 1996. All share and per share amounts in these
financial statements have been retroactively restated for the stock split.
3. INVESTMENTS IN RENTAL PROPERTIES
Investments in rental properties consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMERCIAL
DECEMBER 31, 1996 MULTIFAMILY AND RETAIL TOTAL
- -------------------------------------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Land........................................ $ 139,770,000 $ 18,764,000 $ 158,534,000
Improvements................................ 570,470,000 84,764,000 655,234,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Subtotal.................................. 710,240,000 103,528,000 813,768,000
Accumulated depreciation.................... (33,096,000) (16,594,000) (49,690,000)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total..................................... $ 677,144,000 $ 86,934,000 $ 764,078,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
-------------- -------------- --------------
DECEMBER 31, 1995
- --------------------------------------------
Land........................................ $ 58,032,000 $ 16,566,000 $ 74,598,000
Improvements................................ 209,815,000 85,703,000 295,518,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
Subtotal.................................. 267,847,000 102,269,000 370,116,000
Accumulated depreciation.................... (22,641,000) (25,395,000) (48,036,000)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Total..................................... $ 245,206,000 $ 76,874,000 $ 322,080,000
-------------- -------------- --------------
-------------- -------------- --------------
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. INVESTMENTS IN RENTAL PROPERTIES (CONTINUED)
The future minimum lease payments to be received from lessees under
operating leases at December 31, 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997.................................... $ 11,432,000
1998.................................... 10,296,000
1999.................................... 8,658,000
2000.................................... 6,835,000
2001.................................... 5,852,000
Thereafter.............................. 23,344,000
------------
Total................................. $ 66,417,000
------------
------------
</TABLE>
Leases with residents or users at wholly owned shopping centers provide for
percentage rents based upon the gross revenue of the residents or users. These
percentage rents are in excess of stipulated minimums. Percentage rents under
these operating leases, which are included in rental income, amounted to:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Percentage rent portion attributable to:
Land leases*...................................... $ 3,044,000 $ 5,313,000 $ 4,926,000
Wholly owned real estate.......................... 403,000 183,000 245,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total percentage rent........................... $ 3,447,000 $ 5,496,000 $ 5,171,000
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Consists largely of percentage rent from the Westlake Village property which
was sold in July, 1996.
BRE's carrying value of its assets exceeds the tax basis by $121,180,000.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, approximately $65,000,000 of
taxable gain was deferred under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code for
certain properties sold.
4. MORTGAGE LOANS RECEIVABLE
BRE has various mortgage loans and notes receivable which are to be paid in
monthly installments through 2008. The notes bear interest at rates ranging from
eight to twelve percent. Amounts remaining due to BRE at December 31, 1996 and
1995 aggregate $10,966,000 and $6,977,000, respectively. The allowance for
possible investment losses was $1,250,000 as of December 31, 1996 and 1995. All
loans are secured by real estate.
5. LINES OF CREDIT AND UNSECURED NOTES PAYABLE
At December 31, 1996, two banks had extended to BRE unsecured lines of
credit aggregating $150,000,000, with $30,000,000 expiring in April, 1999 and
$120,000,000 expiring in April, 1998. Borrowings totaled $124,000,000 at
December 31, 1996. No borrowings under these lines of credit were outstanding
during the years ended December 31, 1995 or 1994. In connection with these
arrangements, a fee is charged on the committed amounts. The weighted average
interest rate was 6.6% in the year ended December 31, 1996. Additionally, at
December 31, 1996, there were $73,000,000 in unsecured notes
33
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. LINES OF CREDIT AND UNSECURED NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)
outstanding with an average interest rate of 7.69% with interest only due until
1999. These unsecured notes are to be repaid through scheduled principal
payments from 2000 through 2005.
The lines of credit and unsecured note agreements contain various covenants
which include, among other factors, tangible net worth and requirements to
maintain certain financial ratios. BRE was in compliance with such covenants as
of December 31, 1996.
6. MORTGAGE LOANS PAYABLE
BRE has acquired certain investments in rental property which are subject to
existing mortgage loans payable and has obtained mortgage loans on other
investments. The following data pertains to mortgage loans payable at December
31, 1996, and 1995, respectively:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Mortgage loans payable........................................................... $ 114,985,000 $ 112,290,000
Cost of investments in real estate securing mortgage loans payable............... $ 182,729,000 $ 173,904,000
Annual principal and interest payments........................................... $ 10,137,000 $ 9,769,000
Remaining terms of mortgage loans payable........................................ 1 - 31 years 2 - 33 years
Interest rates................................................................... 6.5 - 8.4% 6.5 - 8.4%
</TABLE>
Included in the $114,985,000 mortgage loans payable is $9,240,000 of
tax-exempt debt with a variable interest rate, which was 4.20% at December 31,
1996. The effective interest rate on this debt is 6.20%, which includes
amortization of related fees and costs. Interest on all other mortgage loans is
fixed.
Scheduled principal payments required on lines of credit, unsecured notes
payable and mortgage loans payable for the next five years are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997......................................... $ 2,655,000
1998......................................... 95,675,000
1999......................................... 35,739,000
2000......................................... 45,436,000
2001......................................... 11,392,000
Thereafter................................... 121,088,000
-------------
Total...................................... $ 311,985,000
-------------
-------------
</TABLE>
Interest expense on mortgage loans and unsecured notes payable including
amortization of related costs aggregated $12,328,000, $7,824,000 and $5,466,000
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Total
interest paid on long-term debt did not differ materially from interest expense.
7. STOCK OPTION PLANS
BRE has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25), and related Interpretations
in accounting for its employee and non-employee director stock options because,
as discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under
Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 123, "Accounting and
Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation" ("Statement 123"), requires the use of
option valuation models that were not developed
34
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK OPTION PLANS (CONTINUED)
for use in valuing employee and non-employee director stock options. Under APB
25, because the exercise price equals the market price of the underlying stock
on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
EMPLOYEE PLAN
The 1984 and 1992 Stock Option Plans ("Plans") provide for the issuance of
Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options, and Restricted Shares. The
maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plans is 1,350,000. The
option price may not be less than the fair market value of a share on the date
that the option is granted and the options generally vest over five years.
Changes in options outstanding during years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
---------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period................. 668,200 $ 15.62 635,200 $ 15.55 479,200 $ 15.57
Granted........................................ 354,000 $ 18.13 115,000 $ 15.94 156,000 $ 15.50
Exercised...................................... (259,100) $ 15.27 (75,000) $ 15.44 -- --
Canceled....................................... (10,500) $ 17.18 (7,000) $ 14.46 -- --
---------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Balance at end of period..................... 752,600 $ 16.90 668,200 $ 15.62 635,200 $ 15.55
---------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
---------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Exercisable.................................... 438,766 $ 16.04 550,200 $ 15.58 423,700 $ 15.30
Restricted shares granted...................... -- -- 13,764 -- 18,000 --
Shares available for granting future options... 105,436 -- 448,336 -- 590,100 --
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year.............................. $ 3.66 $ 2.34 $ 2.07
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the exercise price of shares under option ranged from
$12.97 to $20.00, with a weighted average exercise price of $16.90. The exercise
price of all options granted in the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
was equal to the market price on the date of grant. Expiration dates range from
August 24, 1997 through August 26, 2006 and the weighted average remaining
contractual life of these options is 8.8 years. Stock options were exercised
during 1996 on options originally granted from $12.97 to $17.75.
In addition to the options granted under the Plans, the following stock
options are also outstanding: An option for 100,000 shares (at $15.32) is held
by the President and Chief Executive Officer. This option was registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on a Form S-8 and is not part of the
Plans. This option had a fair value of $2.28 in 1995, the year of the grant. In
conjunction with the Merger, options on 381,900 BRE shares equivalent to options
previously granted under the RCT plan were issued to officers with exercise
prices ranging from $11.41 to $14.70.
In addition to the above, there were 26,264 Restricted Shares outstanding at
December 31, 1996.
35
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK OPTION PLANS (CONTINUED)
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN
The 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, as amended in 1996, provides for
the issuance of 25,000 Non-Qualified Stock Options per year to each non-employee
member of the Board of Directors and an additional 25,000 shares to the Chairman
of the Board of Directors. The maximum number of shares that may be issued under
the Plan is 800,000. As with the Employee Plan, the option price may not be less
than the fair market value of a share on the date the option is granted. Changes
in options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE SHARES PRICE
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of period.................. 195,000 $ 16.48 20,000 $ 15.25 -- $ --
Granted......................................... 225,000 20.63 175,000 16.63 20,000 15.25
Canceled........................................ -- -- -- -- -- --
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Balance at end of period...................... 420,000 $ 18.71 195,000 $ 16.48 20,000 $ 15.25
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
--------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- -----------
Exercisable..................................... 244,999 $ 17.18 49,166 $ 16.06 5,000 $ 15.25
Shares available for granting future options.... 380,000 55,000 230,000
Weighted average fair value of options granted
during the year............................... $ 4.17 $ 2.47 $ 1.95
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, the exercise prices of shares under option ranged
between $15.25 and $21.00, with expiration dates from September 25, 2004 to
October 15, 2006. The exercise price of all options granted in the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was equal to the market price on the date of
grant. The options vest ratably over one year. The weighted average remaining
contractual life of these options is 9.2 years.
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is
required by Statement 123, and has been determined as if BRE had accounted for
the employee and non-employee director stock options granted only in the years
ending December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 under the fair value method of that
Statement. The impact on the years ending December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 of
options granted prior to 1994 has been excluded from this presentation. The fair
value for these options was estimated as of the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions for the years ending December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk-free interest rate........................................ 7.12% 7.12% 7.12%
Dividend yield................................................. 5.6 % 7.1 % 7.8 %
Volatility..................................................... .26 .26 .26
Weighted average option life................................... 9 years 9 years 9 years
</TABLE>
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating
the fair market value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and
are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation
36
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
7. STOCK OPTION PLANS (CONTINUED)
models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the
expected stock price volatility. Because the above stock option plans have
characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate, in management's opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the above
stock option plans.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized over the options' vesting period. BRE's pro forma
information, as if the Company had adopted Statement 123 as discussed above,
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Pro forma net income............................ $ 88,720,000 $ 21,606,000 $ 24,159,000
Pro forma earnings per share*................... $ 2.91 $ 0.97 $ 1.10
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Weighted average outstanding shares are used in the calculation as the
dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents is less than 3%.
8. SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
On August 14, 1989, the Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and
declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each share of BRE's Common
Stock outstanding on September 7, 1989. The Rights entitle holders to purchase,
under certain conditions, shares of Common Stock at a cash purchase price of
$45.00 per share, subject to adjustment. The Rights may also, under certain
conditions, entitle the holders to receive Common Stock, or other consideration,
having a value equal to two times the exercise price of each Right. The Rights
are redeemable by BRE at a price of $.005 per Right. If not so redeemed, the
Rights expire on September 7, 1999.
9. RETIREMENT PLAN
BRE has a defined contribution retirement plan covering all employees with
more than one year of continuous full-time employment. In addition to employee
elective deferrals, BRE contributed an amount equal to 10% of the compensation
expense of participating employees until March 15, 1996; thereafter BRE's
contribution was limited to 1.5% of the participating employee's salary. The
amounts contributed were $78,000, $164,000 and $143,000 for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain executives of BRE have purchased stock, the consideration for which
was interest-bearing recourse loans. The loans may be forgiven in whole or in
part upon the achievement of certain performance goals for BRE related to growth
in assets, funds from operations and stock price. A portion of the loans
expected to be forgiven are expensed currently as compensation. At December 31,
1996, the carrying amount of the loans was $1,235,000. The amounts of such loans
expected to be forgiven and treated as compensation expense were $128,000 and
$50,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. These
receivables are presented as assets rather than reclassified as reductions to
equity because such reclassifications would be immaterial.
37
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
11. LITIGATION
BRE is defending various claims and legal actions that arise from its normal
course of business, including certain environmental actions. While it is not
feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of these matters, in the
opinion of management, none of these actions will have a material adverse effect
on BRE's results of operations or financial position.
12. PROFORMA INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth the results of operations as if the Merger
with RCT had occurred on January 1, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995
-------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues...................................................... $ 110,110,000 $ 99,434,000
Income before gain on sales................................... $ 40,804,000 $ 34,353,000
Net income.................................................... $ 93,629,000 $ 41,952,000
Net income per share:
Income before gain on sales................................. $ 1.25 $ 1.05
Net income.................................................. $ 2.86 $ 1.29
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth supplemental information about results of
operations as if the Merger with RCT (completed on March 15, 1996), the
acquisition of Foster's Landing Apartments (acquired September 27, 1996) and the
acquisition of Promontory Point Apartments (acquired December 31, 1996) had
occurred on January 1, 1995:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995
-------------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues..................................................... $ 118,414,000 $ 110,078,000
Income before gain on sales.................................. $ 40,261,000 $ 28,174,000
Net income................................................... $ 93,086,000 $ 37,733,000
Net income per share:
Income before gain on sales................................ $ 1.23 $ .86
Net income................................................. $ 2.84 $ 1.16
</TABLE>
The unaudited pro forma results of operations are presented for comparative
purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of
BRE would have been for the periods presented had the Merger and acquisitions
occurred on those dates, nor do they purport to represent the results of future
periods.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
As of December 31, 1996, the Company was committed to purchase two
multifamily communities comprising approximately 800 units for a total price of
approximately $85,000,000. These purchase commitments are subject to the
satisfactory completion of the Company's due diligence process. At February 12,
1997, neither of these purchases had been finalized.
38
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (CONTINUED)
On January 23, 1997, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3
with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the issuance of up to
$300,000,000 of unsecured debt securities, Common Stock, preferred stock,
depositary shares or warrants to purchase Common Stock.
On February 11, 1997, the Company temporarily increased its lines of credit
from a total of $150,000,000 to $200,000,000 under the same terms of the lines
of credit existing at December 31, 1996. The additional $50,000,000 is available
for 180 days.
14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
----------------------------------------------------------
QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30* DECEMBER 31
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues........................................... $ 18,825 $ 26,849 $ 26,269 $ 29,708
Income before gain on sales........................ 7,385 9,852 9,767 10,010
Net income......................................... 7,384 10,078 59,119 13,258
Net income per share:
Income before gain on sales...................... $ .31 $ .30 $ .30 $ .30
Net income....................................... $ .31 $ .31 $ 1.92 $ .40
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995
----------------------------------------------------------
QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31 JUNE 30 SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues........................................... $ 15,925 $ 15,862 $ 16,542 $ 17,058
Income before gain on sales........................ 5,700 5,794 6,052 6,243
Net income......................................... 6,819 3,794 6,052 5,345
Net income per share:
Income before gain on sales...................... $ .27 $ .26 $ .28 $ .28
Net income....................................... $ .32 $ .17 $ .28 $ .24
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
*The quarter ended September 30, 1996 included a gain on sale of property of
$49,352,000, which was primarily from the disposition of the Westlake Village
property.
39
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS
AMOUNT AT
WHICH
CARRIED
AT
INITIAL COST TO COMPANY DECEMBER
COSTS 31, 1996
DATES ------------------------ CAPITALIZED ---------
ACQUIRED/ BUILDINGS & SUBSEQUENT TO DEPRECIABLE
NAME LOCATION CONSTRUCTED LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION LIVES-YEARS LAND
- --------------------- ------------------ -------------- --------- ------------- --------------- ----------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
APARTMENTS
Sharon Green....... Menlo Park, CA 1971/1970 $ 1,250 $ 5,770 $ 205 45 $ 1,250
The Verandas....... Union City, CA 1993/1989 3,233 12,932 64 40 3,233
Foster's Landing... Foster City, CA 1996/1987 11,741 47,849 40 11,741
Promontory Point... San Ramon, CA 1996/1992 8,724 34,895 40 8,724
Montanosa.......... San Diego, CA 1992/1989-90 6,005 24,065 172 40 6,005
Lakeview Village... Spring Valley, CA 1996/1985 3,977 15,910 33 40 3,977
Terra Nova
Villas........... Chula Vista, CA 1994/1985 2,925 11,699 65 40 2,925
San Diego, CA 1993/1985-1987 4,869 19,493 152 40 4,869
Mira Mesa
(Cimarron,
Hacienda,
Westpark)........
Canyon Villas...... Chula Vista, CA 1996/1981 3,064 12,258 99 40 3,064
Winchester......... San Diego, CA 1994/1987 1,482 5,928 1 40 1,482
Countryside
Village.......... El Cajon, CA 1996/1989 1,002 4,007 36 40 1,002
Windrush Village... Colton, CA 1996/1985 3,747 14,989 5 40 3,747
Village Green...... La Habra, CA 1972/1971 372 2,763 303 45 372
Candlewood North... Northridge, CA 1996/1964-1995 2,110 8,477 40 2,110
Park Glenn......... Camarillo, CA 1996/1963 1,750 7,000 23 40 1,750
The Summit......... Chino Hills, CA 1996/1989 1,839 7,354 9 40 1,839
Santa Paula
Village.......... Santa Paula, CA 1996/1970 550 2,200 1 40 550
Fountain Valley,
Sycamore Valley.... CA 1996/1969 4,617 18,691 40 4,617
<CAPTION>
BUILDINGS & ACCUMULATED
NAME IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION ENCUMBRANCES
- --------------------- ------------- --------- ------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
APARTMENTS
Sharon Green....... $ 5,975 $ 7,225 $ (3,146) $ 18,937
The Verandas....... 12,996 16,229 (1,190) 11,865
Foster's Landing... 47,849 59,590 (294) --
Promontory Point... 34,895 43,619 -- --
Montanosa.......... 24,237 30,242 (2,420) 16,866
Lakeview Village... 15,943 19,920 (315) --
Terra Nova
Villas........... 11,764 14,689 (807) 9,240
19,645 24,514 (1,593) 12,976
Mira Mesa
(Cimarron,
Hacienda,
Westpark)........
Canyon Villas...... 12,357 15,421 (243) --
Winchester......... 5,929 7,411 (410) --
Countryside
Village.......... 4,043 5,045 (79) --
Windrush Village... 14,994 18,741 (297) --
Village Green...... 3,066 3,438 (1,703) --
Candlewood North... 8,477 10,587 (177) --
Park Glenn......... 7,023 8,773 (139) --
The Summit......... 7,363 9,202 (146) --
Santa Paula
Village.......... 2,201 2,751 (44) --
Sycamore Valley.... 18,691 23,308 (156) --
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INITIAL COST
TO COMPANY COSTS
------------------- CAPITALIZED
DATES ACQUIRED/ BUILDINGS & SUBSEQUENT TO DEPRECIABLE
NAME LOCATION CONSTRUCTED LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION LIVES-YEARS
- ----------------- -------------- ----------------- ----- ------------ ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selby Ranch...... Sacramento, CA 1986/1971-1974 2,660 18,340 291 40
Hazel Ranch...... Fair Oaks, CA 1996/1985 2,471 9,885 6 40
Canterbury
Downs.......... Roseville, CA 1996/1993 2,297 9,190 50 40
Shaliko.......... Rocklin, CA 1996/1990 2,049 8,198 3 40
Rocklin Gold..... Rocklin, CA 1996/1990 1,558 6,232 4 40
Quail Chase...... Folsom, CA 1996/1990 1,303 5,211 5 40
Scottsdale
Cove........... Scottsdale, AZ 1991-94/1992-1994 3,243 14,468 39 40
Fairway
Crossings...... Phoenix, AZ 1996/1985 3,657 14,629 17 40
Newport Landing.. Glendale, AZ 1995-96/1987-1996 4,467 18,171 40
Brentwood........ Phoenix, AZ 1996/1980 1,712 6,849 17 40
Posada del
Este........... Phoenix, AZ 1996/1981 1,670 6,679 20 40
Park
Scottsdale..... Scottsdale, AZ 1996/1979 1,319 5,279 32 40
Los Senderos..... Phoenix, AZ 1996/1980 1,284 5,134 10 40
Shadow Bend...... Scottsdale, AZ 1996/1982 1,284 5,134 8 40
Monte Vista...... Phoenix, AZ 1996/1972 315 1,260 4 40
Arcadia Cove..... Phoenix, AZ 1996/1996 4,909 19,902 40
Hacienda del
Rio............ Tucson, AZ 1994/1983 1,859 7,437 78 40
Springhill....... Tucson, AZ 1994/1987 1,733 6,933 33 40
Fountain Plaza... Tucson, AZ 1994/1975 907 3,628 34 40
Colonia del
Rio............ Tucson, AZ 1994/1985 1,774 7,094 46 40
Camino Seco
Village........ Tucson, AZ 1995/1984 1,335 5,360 15 40
Casas Lindas..... Tucson, AZ 1994/1987 1,513 6,051 22 40
Oracle Village... Tucson, AZ 1994/1983 1,209 4,837 24 40
Ballinger
Commons........ Seattle, WA 1996/1989 5,824 23,519 40
Shadowbrook...... Redmond, WA 1987/1986 3,605 12,709 152 40
Parkwood......... Mill Creek, WA 1989/1989 3,947 15,811 45 40
<CAPTION>
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
--------------------------------------------------------
BUILDINGS & ACCUMULATED
NAME LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION ENCUMBRANCES
- ----------------- ----- ------------ ------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selby Ranch...... 2,660 18,631 21,291 (4,919) 12,450
Hazel Ranch...... 2,471 9,891 12,362 (196) --
Canterbury
Downs.......... 2,297 9,240 11,537 (182) --
Shaliko.......... 2,049 8,201 10,250 (162) --
Rocklin Gold..... 1,558 6,236 7,794 (123) --
Quail Chase...... 1,303 5,216 6,519 (103) --
Scottsdale
Cove........... 3,243 14,507 17,750 (1,384) --
Fairway
Crossings...... 3,657 14,646 18,303 (291) --
Newport Landing.. 4,467 18,171 22,638 (236) --
Brentwood........ 1,712 6,866 8,578 (136) --
Posada del
Este........... 1,670 6,699 8,369 (132) --
Park
Scottsdale..... 1,320 5,310 6,630 (104) --
Los Senderos..... 1,284 5,144 6,428 (102) --
Shadow Bend...... 1,284 5,142 6,426 (102) --
Monte Vista...... 315 1,264 1,579 (25) --
Arcadia Cove..... 4,909 19,902 24,811 (137) --
Hacienda del
Rio............ 1,859 7,515 9,374 (404) 5,534
Springhill....... 1,733 6,966 8,699 (391) 5,259
Fountain Plaza... 907 3,662 4,569 (197) 3,103
Colonia del
Rio............ 1,774 7,140 8,914 (400) 5,197
Camino Seco
Village........ 1,335 5,375 6,710 (190) 4,173
Casas Lindas..... 1,513 6,073 7,586 (366) --
Oracle Village... 1,209 4,861 6,070 (273) 4,128
Ballinger
Commons........ 5,824 23,519 29,343 (403) --
Shadowbrook...... 3,605 12,861 16,466 (3,052) --
Parkwood......... 3,947 15,856 19,803 (2,832) --
</TABLE>
41
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INITIAL COST
TO COMPANY COSTS
----------------------- CAPITALIZED
DATES ACQUIRED/ BUILDINGS & SUBSEQUENT TO DEPRECIABLE
NAME LOCATION CONSTRUCTED LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION LIVES-YEARS
- ------------------------ -------------------- --------------- ------- -------------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thrasher's Mill......... Bothell, WA 1996/1988 2,031 8,223 40
Citywalk................ Seattle, WA 1988/1988 1,123 4,276 11 40
Brookdale Glen.......... Portland, OR 1993/1985 2,797 11,188 94 40
Berkshire Court......... Wilsonville, OR 1996/1996 3,284 13,200 40
Desert Lakes............ Las Vegas, NV 1996/1991 2,779 11,116 361 40
Cypress Springs II...... Las Vegas, NV 1996/1993 1,965 7,861 -- 40
Tango................... Las Vegas, NV 1996/1990 1,729 6,916 10 40
Villa Serra............. Cupertino, CA 1973/1970 900 --
Construction in progress
and other............. Various Various -- 872 Var.
------- ------- ------
Subtotal--Apartments.... 139,769 567,872 2,599
------- ------- ------
SHOPPING CENTERS
The Hub................. Fremont, CA 1973/1961-87 5,494 5,822 31,060 30-40
Santa Fe Springs
Plaza................. Santa Fe Springs, CA 1996/1985 3,411 13,643 8 40
El Camino............... Woodland Hills, CA 1971/1970 1,500 10,037 4,011 40
Elsinore Valley
Center................ Lake Elsinore, CA 1996/1981 446 1,786 -- 40
Central Shopping
Center................ Ventura, CA 1996/1985 1,060 4,240 73 40
Vista Village Center.... Valencia, CA 1996/1989 600 2,400 31 40
------- ------- ------
Subtotal--Shopping
Centers............... 12,511 37,928 35,183
------- ------- ------
<CAPTION>
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------------------------
BUILDINGS & ACCUMULATED
NAME LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION ENCUMBRANCES
- ------------------------ ------- -------------- ------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Thrasher's Mill......... 2,031 8,223 10,254 (141) --
Citywalk................ 1,123 4,287 5,410 (934) --
Brookdale Glen.......... 2,797 11,282 14,079 (1,052) --
Berkshire Court......... 3,284 13,200 16,484 (137) --
Desert Lakes............ 2,779 11,477 14,256 (221) --
Cypress Springs II...... 1,965 7,861 9,826 (156) --
Tango................... 1,729 6,926 8,655 (137) 4,152
Villa Serra............. 900 -- 900 -- --
Construction in progress
and other............. -- 872 872 (317) --
------- ------- ------- ----------- ------------
Subtotal--Apartments.... 139,770 570,470 710,240 (33,096) 113,880
------- ------- ------- ----------- ------------
SHOPPING CENTERS
The Hub................. 5,494 36,882 42,376 (13,260) --
Santa Fe Springs
Plaza................. 3,411 13,651 17,062 (285) --
El Camino............... 1,500 14,048 15,548 (2,664) 1,105
Elsinore Valley
Center................ 446 1,786 2,232 (21) --
Central Shopping
Center................ 1,060 4,313 5,373 (84) --
Vista Village Center.... 600 2,431 3,031 (48) --
------- ------- ------- ----------- ------------
Subtotal--Shopping
Centers............... 12,511 73,111 85,622 (16,362) 1,105
------- ------- ------- ----------- ------------
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INITIAL COST
TO COMPANY COSTS
---------------------- CAPITALIZED
DATES ACQUIRED/ BUILDINGS & SUBSEQUENT TO DEPRECIABLE
NAME LOCATION CONSTRUCTED LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACQUISITION LIVES/YEARS
- ----------------------- --------------- --------------- -------- ------------ ------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
Montalvo
Industrial......... Oxnard, CA 1996/1965- 200 800 42 40
1984
Santa Ana
Industrial......... Santa Ana, CA 1996/1985 312 805 -- 40
Coast Auto Center.... Ventura, CA 1996/1992 260 1,040 38 40
Hawthorne/Del Amo
Retail............. Torrance, CA 1996/1985 1,500 -- -- 40
Santa Paula
Commercial......... Santa Paula, CA 1996/1963 60 240 23 40
Vagabond Motor
Hotel.............. Ventura, CA 1996/1921 600 -- -- 40
Buenaventura Medical
Clinic............. Ventura, CA 1996/1960 1,200 -- -- 40
Skypark Professional
Building........... Torrance, CA 1996/1978 1,134 4,538 178 40
Valencia Medical
Center............. Valencia, CA 1996/1985 987 3,949 -- 40
-------- ------------ -------------
Subtotal--Commercial/
Industrial......... 6,253 11,372 281
-------- ------------ -------------
Total............ $158,533 $617,172 $38,063
-------- ------------ -------------
-------- ------------ -------------
<CAPTION>
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH CARRIED AT DECEMBER 31, 1996
-------------------------------------------------------------
BUILDINGS & ACCUMULATED
NAME LAND IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL DEPRECIATION ENCUMBRANCES
- ----------------------- -------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
COMMERCIAL/
INDUSTRIAL
Montalvo
Industrial......... 200 842 1,042 (16) --
Santa Ana
Industrial......... 312 805 1,117 (5) --
Coast Auto Center.... 260 1,078 1,338 (21) --
Hawthorne/Del Amo
Retail............. 1,500 -- 1,500 -- --
Santa Paula
Commercial......... 60 263 323 (5) --
Vagabond Motor
Hotel.............. 600 -- 600 -- --
Buenaventura Medical
Clinic............. 1,200 -- 1,200 -- --
Skypark Professional
Building........... 1,134 4,716 5,850 (101) --
Valencia Medical
Center............. 987 3,949 4,936 (84) --
-------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------
Subtotal--Commercial/
Industrial......... 6,253 11,653 17,906 (232) --
-------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------
Total............ $158,534 $655,234 $813,768 $(49,690) $114,985
-------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------
-------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------------
</TABLE>
43
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
The activity in investments in rental properties and related depreciation
for the three year period ended December 31, 1996 is as follows:
INVESTMENTS IN RENTAL PROPERTIES:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year....................................... $ 370,116 $ 372,478 $ 308,906
Investments acquired in merger (excluding partnership
investments)..................................................... 273,055 -- --
Investments purchased.............................................. 230,967 16,023 72,240
Transfers from Construction in progress............................ 1,550 -- --
Investments sold................................................... (63,425) (18,802) (13,802)
Reduction in carrying value........................................ -- (1,750) --
Capital Expenditures............................................... 1,505 2,167 5,134
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at end of year............................................. $ 813,768 $ 370,116 $ 372,478
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of year.......................................... $ 48,036 $ 43,789 $ 40,246
Depreciation expense.................................................. 13,283 7,864 7,080
Accumulated depreciation on Investments sold.......................... (11,629) (3,617) (3,537)
---------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of year................................................ $ 49,690 $ 48,036 $ 43,789
---------- --------- ---------
---------- --------- ---------
</TABLE>
44
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER IDENTITY OF EXHIBIT
- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Previously filed on March 15, 1995 in the Exhibits to
Form 8-K and incorporated by reference herein.)...........................................
3.2 By-Laws (Previously filed on December 22, 1995 in the Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No.
33-65365) and incorporated by reference herein.)..........................................
10.1 1984 Stock Option Plan, as amended to date (Previously filed on October 19, 1992 in the
Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)..............................
10.2 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated to date (Previously filed on
October 19, 1992 in the Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)......
10.3 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (Previously filed on October 23, 1994 in the Exhibits
to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.).......................................
10.4 1992 Payroll Investment Plan (Previously filed on October 19, 1992 in the Exhibits to Form
10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)...............................................
10.5 Form of Indemnification Agreement (Previously filed on September 25, 1986, as amended, in
Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No. 33-9014) and incorporated by reference herein.)............
10.8 Employment agreement with Frank C. McDowell (Previously filed on October 23, 1995 in the
Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)..............................
10.9 Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit agreement with Arthur G. von Thaden (Previously
filed on October 24, 1988 in the Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference
herein.)..................................................................................
10.10 Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit agreement with Howard E. Mason, Jr. (Previously
filed on October 24, 1988 in the Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference
herein.)..................................................................................
10.11 BRE Properties, Inc. Retirement Plan (Previously filed on October 24, 1988 in the Exhibits
to Form 10- K and incorporated by reference herein.)......................................
10.12 BRE Properties, Inc. Supplemental ERISA Retirement Plan (Previously filed on October 23,
1995 in the Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)..................
10.13 Sublease with Wells Fargo Bank on 10,142 square feet at Suite 2500, One Montgomery Street,
San Francisco, California (Previously filed on October 24, 1988 in the Exhibits to Form
10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)...............................................
10.14 Form of deferred compensation agreement with Eugene P. Carver (Previously filed on October
13, 1994 in the Exhibits to Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)..............
10.15 Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended (Previously filed
on December 22, 1995 in the Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No. 33-65365) and incorporated by
reference herein.)........................................................................
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER IDENTITY OF EXHIBIT
- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
10.16 Amendment to the Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, dated as of
April, 1996...............................................................................
10.17 Treasury Lock Swap Transaction (Previously filed on November 13, 1996 in the Exhibits to
Form 10-Q and incorporated by reference herein.)..........................................
10.18 Employment agreement with Jay W. Pauly (Previously filed on December 22, 1995 in the
Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No. 33-65365) and incorporated by reference herein.)...........
10.19 Employment agreement with LeRoy E. Carlson (Previously filed on December 22, 1995 in the
Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No. 33- 65365) and incorporated by reference herein.)..........
10.20 Employment agreement with John H. Nunn (Previously filed on December 22, 1995 in the
Exhibits to Form S-4 (File No. 33-65365) and incorporated by reference herein.)...........
10.21 Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Previously filed on August 9, 1996 in the Exhibits to Form S-3
(File No. 333-09945) and incorporated by reference herein.)...............................
10.22 1991 Stock Option Plan for Real Estate Investment Trust of California.......................
10.23 Sanwa Bank California Credit Agreement, dated April 9, 1996.................................
10.24 First Amendment to Sanwa Bank California Credit Agreement, dated December 12, 1996..........
10.25 Unsecured Line of Credit Loan Agreement by and between BRE Properties, Inc., as Borrower and
Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as Lender, dated April 4, 1996....
10.26 Modification Agreement to Syndicate Loan to BRE Properties, Inc. made by various financial
institutions with Bank of America NT & SA as Agent........................................
10.27 Second Modification Agreement Regarding Unsecured Line of Credit to BRE Properties, Inc.
made by various financial institutions with Bank of America NT & SA as Agent..............
10.28 Unsecured Line of Credit Loan Agreement by and between BRE Properties, Inc., as Borrower,
and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as Lender, dated as of
February 11, 1997.........................................................................
10.29 Modification Agreement to Syndicate Loan to BRE Properties, Inc. made by various financial
institutions with Bank of America NT & SA as Agent........................................
10.30 Loan Agreement between The Prudential Insurance Company of America, as Lender and Real
Estate Investment Trust of California, as Borrower, dated as of January 31, 1994..........
10.31 First Amendment to Loan Agreement by and between The Prudential Insurance Company of America
and Real Estate Investment Trust of California, dated July 7, 1995 .......................
10.32 Second Amendment to Loan Agreement by and between The Prudential Insurance Company of
America and BRE Properties, Inc., dated April 30, 1996....................................
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
BRE PROPERTIES, INC.
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 1996
(000S OMITTED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER IDENTITY OF EXHIBIT
- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
10.33 Third Amendment to Loan Agreement by and between The Prudential Insurance Company of America
and BRE Properties, Inc., dated November 20, 1996.........................................
10.34 Loan Agreement between The Prudential Insurance Company of America, as Lender and Real
Estate Investment Trust of California, as Borrower, dated as of July 7, 1995..............
10.35 First Amendment to Loan Agreement by and between The Prudential Insurance Company of America
and BRE Properties, Inc., dated April 30, 1996............................................
10.36 Second Amendment to Loan Agreement by and between The Prudential Insurance Company of
America and BRE Properties, Inc., dated November 20, 1996.................................
11 Computation of earnings per share...........................................................
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Previously filed on October 13, 1994 in the Exhibits to Form
10-K and incorporated by reference herein.)...............................................
23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP................................................................
27 Financial Data Schedule.....................................................................
</TABLE>
47
