<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K/A
REPORT (AMENDMENT NO. 2) PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) August 22, 1997
--------------------------------
Bigmar, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 1-14416 31-1445779
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other (Commission (I.R.S. Employer
jurisdiction File Number) Identification No.)
of incorporation)
9711 Sportsman Club Road, Johnstown, Ohio 43031-9141
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (614) 966-5800
------------------------------
6660 Doubletree Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43229
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
<PAGE>
Item 4. Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.
In accordance with Item 304 of Regulation S-K, the following information
pertains to the change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant:
(i) Effective August 22, 1997, KPMG Peat Marwick LLP ("KPMG") has been
appointed as the Registrant's certified public accountants replacing Richard A.
Eisner & Company, LLP ("Eisner & Company") who has been dismissed as of August
22, 1997;
(ii) The Eisner & Company reports on the financial statements of the
Company for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 do not contain an
adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was either report qualified
or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except
as set forth in the Report of Independent Auditors dated March 3, 1997 and
with respect to Note C, March 27, 1997, which included an explanatory
paragraph indicating that there was substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.
(iii) The Company's decision to change its accountants was
conditionally approved by the Company's Board of Directors (subject to the
Company's negotiation and execution of an engagement agreement with KPMG).
(iv) The Registrant had no disagreements with Eisner & Company on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure,
or auditing scope or procedure in any of the Registrant's two most recent
fiscal years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 or the subsequent interim
period ended August 22, 1997 which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Eisner & Company, would have caused it to make reference to
the subject matter of such disagreement in connection with its report for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 or in connection with any
report which might be issued for any subsequent interim period ended August
22, 1997;
(v) None of the kind of events listed in subsections (A) through (D)
of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K occurred during either of the
Registrant's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 or
during the subsequent interim period August 22, 1997.
The Company had previously reported that "accounting information with respect
to the agreement disclosed in Item 5-Other Information in the June 30, 1997
10-Q, if further investigated, may materially impact the fairness or
reliability of the financial statement to be issued covering the fiscal
period subsequent to the financial statements covered by an audit report."
These comments were included in the previous Form 8-K at the request of the
Company's former auditors, Eisner & Company. The purpose of these comments
was to acknowledge that an audit had not yet been performed by the Company's
previous auditors, Eisner & Company, for the fiscal period January 1, 1997 to
August 22, 1997.
To further clarify the nature of the transaction, the transaction is as
follows, and it will be treated as follows, and it will not effect the
fairness or the reliability of the Company's financial statements.
On August 4, 1997 the Company consummated an agreement to acquire the U.S.
rights to sell all oncological products previously assigned to Protyde
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Protyde). The Company paid $2,000,000 to Protyde
which included a return of advances for reimbursable expenses of $750,000 and
$1,250,000 for the U.S. rights, plus the value of warrants to purchase up to
500,000 fully-paid and non-assessable shares of common stock of the Company.
The Company intends to record a charge to income in the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 for the net amount of consideration given to Protyde.
<PAGE>
Item 7. Exhibits
16. Letter to Securities and Exchange Commission from Richard A.
Eisner & Company, LLP dated September 30, 1997.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securites Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly causes this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Bigmar, Inc.
-----------------------------------------
(Registrant)
September 30, 1997 By: /s/ Michael K. Medora
-------------------------------------
Michael K. Medora
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
3
<PAGE>
[LETTERHEAD]
September 30, 1997
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street NW
Washington, DC 20549
RE: Bigmar, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have read the amended Form 8-K dated September 29, 1997, originally
dated August 22, 1997, and are in agreement with the statements
contained therein except for matters relating to KPMG Peat Marwick,
LLP and item (iii) as to which we have no knowledge. Also with
respect to item (v), the reason that we had previously suggested that
Bigmar, Inc, include the statement that "information with respect to
the agreement disclosed in item (v)-- Other information in the June 30,
1997 10-Q, if further investigated, may materially impact the fairness
or reliability of the financial statements to be issued covering the
fiscal period subsequent to the financial statements covered by an
audit report in its Form 8-K dated August 22, 1997, was not to
acknowledge that an audit had not yet been performed by us for the
period January 1, 1997 to August 22, 1997. However, in our view the
information was required to be provided in accordance with subsection
(C) of Item 304 (a)(1)(v). Without performing a review of the
transaction described in Item (v) of the amended Form 8-K, we have no
basis to disagree with the accounting treatment, or characterization
of the transaction indicated in the amended Form 8-K dated September
29, 1997.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
RAE: mo