<PAGE>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
(Mark One)
[X]ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
OR
[_]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-28292
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
----------------
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
DELAWARE 95-1782887
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
4565 COLORADO BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90039
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE) (ZIP CODE)
</TABLE>
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (818) 241-6215
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE
----------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
Registrant, as of March 3, 1997, was $246,352,303.
As of March 3, 1997, Registrant had outstanding 18,245,265 shares of Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's 1996 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Registrant's
1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are incorporated by reference in Part III
hereof.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended December 31, 1996
PART I
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<C> <S> <C>
Item 1. Business....................................................... 1
General........................................................ 1
Business Strategy.............................................. 4
Retail Financial Services Group................................ 6
Lending Activities............................................. 7
Credit Administration.......................................... 14
Credit Loss Experience......................................... 24
Foreclosure Policies........................................... 29
Real Estate Acquired in Settlement of Loans.................... 29
Bulk Sales..................................................... 31
Treasury Activities............................................ 31
Sources of Funds............................................... 33
Interest Rate Risk Management.................................. 37
Competition.................................................... 37
Employees...................................................... 38
Regulation and Supervision..................................... 38
Item 2. Properties..................................................... 50
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.............................................. 50
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............ 51
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters........................................... 52
Item 6. Selected Financial Data........................................ 53
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and 55
Results of Operations.........................................
Forward-Looking Statements..................................... 55
Overview....................................................... 55
Results of Operations.......................................... 55
Net Interest Income............................................ 56
Asset/Liability Management..................................... 59
Asset Quality.................................................. 62
Noninterest Income/Expense..................................... 66
Operating Expenses............................................. 67
Income Taxes................................................... 68
Regulatory Capital Compliance.................................. 70
Capital Resources and Liquidity................................ 72
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.................... F-1
Item 9. Change in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.......................................... II-1
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............. II-1
Item 11. Executive Compensation......................................... II-1
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. II-1
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................. II-1
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K...................................................... II-1
Signatures..................................................... II-5
</TABLE>
i
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
GENERAL
Bank Plus Corporation ("Bank Plus"), through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Fidelity Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, and its subsidiaries
("Fidelity" or the "Bank"), offers a broad range of consumer financial
services, including demand and term deposits, and loans to consumers, through
33 full-service branches, all of which are located in Southern California,
principally in Los Angeles and Orange counties. At this time, the Bank makes
available to its customers residential mortgages and consumer loans, which the
Bank does not underwrite or fund, by referral to certain established providers
of mortgage and consumer loan products with which the Bank has negotiated
strategic alliances. In addition, through Bank Plus' subsidiary Gateway
Investment Services, Inc. ("Gateway"), a National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. ("NASD") registered broker/dealer, the Bank provides customers
with uninsured investment products, including a number of mutual funds,
annuities and unit investment trusts.
In the fourth quarter of 1995, Fidelity completed a plan of recapitalization
(the "1995 Recapitalization"), pursuant to which Fidelity raised approximately
$134.4 million in net new equity through the sale of 2,070,000 shares of 12%
Noncumulative Exchangeable Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A ("Series A
Preferred Stock"), and 47,000,000 shares of Fidelity Class A Common Stock. As
part of the 1995 Recapitalization, Fidelity adopted the accelerated asset
resolution plan (the "Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan"), which was designed
to aggressively dispose of, resolve, or otherwise manage a pool of primarily
multifamily mortgage loans and real estate owned ("REO"). As a result,
Fidelity recorded a $45.0 million loan portfolio charge in the allowance for
estimated loan losses which represented the estimated additional losses
expected to be incurred in connection with the implementation of the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A")--Asset
Quality--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
On February 9, 1996, the Bank's stockholders approved a one-for-four reverse
stock split of the issued and outstanding shares of the Bank's Class A Common
Stock. Upon effectiveness of the reverse stock split, each stockholder became
the owner of one share of Common Stock for each four shares of Common Stock
held at the time of the reverse stock split and became entitled to receive
cash in lieu of any fractional shares. All per share data and weighted average
common shares outstanding have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the
reverse stock split.
In May 1996, Fidelity completed a reorganization pursuant to which all of
the outstanding common stock of Fidelity was converted on a one-for-one basis
into all of the outstanding common stock of Bank Plus, and Bank Plus became
the holding company for Fidelity (the "Reorganization"). Effective May 17,
1996, Bank Plus Common Stock was listed on the Nasdaq National Market
("NASDAQ") under the symbol "BPLS". Bank Plus' principal operating
subsidiaries are Fidelity and Gateway, which prior to the Reorganization was a
subsidiary of the Bank. Bank Plus currently has no significant business or
operations other than serving as the holding company for Fidelity and Gateway.
Fidelity's deposits are highly concentrated in Los Angeles and Orange
counties. The 33 branches held average deposit balances of $75.6 million and
total balances of approximately $2.5 billion at December 31, 1996. At December
31, 1996, the Bank's gross mortgage loan portfolio aggregated approximately
$2.8 billion, 62% of which was secured by residential properties containing 5
or more units, 31% of which was secured by single family and multifamily
residential properties containing 2 to 4 units and 7% of which was secured by
commercial and other property. At that same date, 97% of the Bank's loans
consisted of adjustable-rate mortgages.
The Bank's deposit accounts are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the "FDIC") through the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the
"SAIF") to the maximum extent permitted by law. The
1
<PAGE>
Bank is subject to the examination, supervision and reporting requirements of
the Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS"), which is the Bank's primary
federal banking regulator, and is also subject to examination and supervision
by the FDIC. As a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank Plus, Gateway is subject to
limited examination and supervision by the OTS and is also subject to
regulation as a registered broker/dealer by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC").
On September 30, 1996 legislation was enacted that required member
institutions to recapitalize the SAIF by paying a one-time special assessment
of approximately 65.7 basis points on all assessable deposits as of March 31,
1995. The one-time special assessment resulted in the Bank recording an $18.0
million charge in additional SAIF premiums. See "--Regulation and
Supervision--Fidelity--Deposit Insurance."
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the "Company" in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") include Bank Plus and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. All references to Fidelity or the Bank
with respect to the period after August 3, 1994 and before the Reorganization
include Gateway, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank's former
holding company, Citadel Holding Corporation ("Citadel"), during a portion of
the periods covered hereby, and on August 3, 1994, became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fidelity. The principal executive offices of Bank Plus and
Fidelity are located at 4565 Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California
90039, telephone number (818) 241-6215.
2
<PAGE>
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and other data for the
Company at the dates or for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets............. $3,330,290 $3,299,444 $3,709,838 $4,389,781 $4,695,518
Total loans, net......... 2,691,931 2,935,116 3,288,303 3,712,051 3,990,449
Deposits................. 2,495,933 2,600,869 2,697,272 3,368,664 3,459,648
FHLB advances............ 449,851 292,700 332,700 326,400 581,400
Other borrowings......... 140,000 150,000 500,000 407,830 327,000
Preferred stock issued by
consolidated subsidiary. 51,750 -- -- -- --
Subordinated notes....... -- -- -- 60,000 60,000
Stockholders' equity..... 161,657 229,043 156,547 182,284 220,171
Stockholders' equity per
common share(1)(2)...... 8.86 9.72 (3) 24.11 173.51 209.57
Common shares
outstanding(1)(2)....... 18,245,265 18,242,465 6,492,465 1,050,561 1,050,561
OPERATING DATA:
Interest income.......... $ 237,913 $ 246,477 $ 241,465 $ 289,331 $ 370,715
Interest expense......... 152,623 174,836 155,828 188,494 240,124
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income...... 85,290 71,641 85,637 100,837 130,591
Provision for estimated
loan losses............. 15,610 69,724 (4) 65,559 65,100 51,180
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income after
provision for estimated
loan losses............. 69,680 1,917 20,078 35,737 79,411
Noninterest income
(expense)............... 2,246 11,062 (7,793) (38,685) (6,247)
SAIF special assessment.. (18,000) -- -- -- --
1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization
charges, net............ -- -- (65,394) -- --
Operating expense other
than SAIF special
assessment and 1994
Restructuring and
Recapitalization
charges................. (64,451) (81,954) (91,859) (98,732) (75,044)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(Loss) before income
taxes and minority
interest in subsidiary.. (10,525) (68,975) (144,968) (101,680) (1,880)
Income tax (benefit)
expense................. (1,093) 4 (16,524) (35,793) (2,167)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) earnings
before minority interest
in subsidiary........... (9,432) (68,979) (128,444) (65,887) 287
Minority interest in
earnings of subsidiary
(dividends on subsidiary
preferred stock)........ (4,657) -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) earnings...... (14,089) (68,979) (128,444) (65,887) 287
Preferred stock
dividends............... (1,553) -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(Loss) earnings available
for common stockholders. $ (15,642) $ (68,979) $ (128,444) $ (65,887) $ 287
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net (loss) earnings per
common share(1)(2)...... $ (0.86) $ (8.84) $ (39.08) $ (62.72) $ 0.27
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Weighted average common
shares
outstanding(1)(2)....... 18,242,887 7,807,201 3,286,960 1,050,561 1,050,561
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
SELECTED OPERATING
RATIOS:
(Loss) return on average
assets.................. (0.42)% (1.92)% (3.17)% (1.43)% 0.01%
(Loss) return on average
equity.................. (7.01)% (5) (42.31)% (83.00)% (29.99)% 0.13%
Average equity divided by
average assets.......... 6.71 % 4.54 % 3.82 % 4.77 % 4.57%
Ending equity divided by
ending assets........... 4.85 % 6.94 % 4.22 % 4.15 % 4.69%
Operating expense to
average assets(6)....... 1.94 % 2.28 % 2.27 % 2.14 % 1.52%
Efficiency ratio(7)...... 67.77 % 89.81 % 97.58 % 79.66 % 45.38%
Interest rate spread for
the period.............. 2.31 % 1.89 % 2.24 % 2.31 % 2.66%
Net yield on interest-
earning assets.......... 2.63 % 2.05 % 2.22 % 2.31 % 2.80%
ASSET QUALITY DATA:
NPAs(8).................. $ 60,788 $ 71,431 $ 85,729 $ 235,621 $ 234,405
NPAs to total assets..... 1.83 % 2.16 % 2.31 % 5.37 % 4.99%
Nonaccruing loans........ $ 36,125 $ 51,910 $ 71,614 $ 93,475 $ 112,041
Nonaccruing loans to
total loans, net........ 1.34 % 1.77 % 2.18 % 2.52 % 2.83%
Classified assets........ $ 174,096 $ 219,077 $ 141,536 $ 372,502 $ 353,738
Classified assets to
total assets............ 5.23 % 6.64 % 3.82 % 8.49 % 7.53%
REGULATORY CAPITAL
RATIOS:
Tangible capital ratio... 6.28 % 6.91 % 4.28 % 4.10 % 4.27%
Core capital ratio....... 6.29 % 6.92 % 4.29 % 4.15 % 4.35%
Risk-based capital ratio. 11.85 % 12.43 % 8.28 % 9.32 % 9.76%
OTHER DATA:
Sales of investment
products(9)............. $ 118,061 $ 89,824 $ 112,430 $ 96,253 $ 77,078
Average interest rate on
new loans............... 8.41 % 9.61 % 5.85 % 6.75 % 7.77%
Loans sold, net(10)...... $ (2,069) $ 390 $ 273,272 $ 115,003 $ 204,435
Number of:
Real estate loan
accounts (in
thousands)............. 11 12 14 16 18
Deposit accounts (in
thousands)............. 194 207 216 241 233
Retail branch
offices(11)............ 33 33 33 42 43
</TABLE>
(footnotes on following page)
3
<PAGE>
(footnotes from previous page)
- --------
(1) For the periods prior to August 4, 1994, Fidelity's one share owned by
Citadel, its former holding company and sole stockholder, has been
retroactively reclassified into 1,050,561 shares of Class A Common Stock.
(2) On February 9, 1996, the Bank's stockholders approved a one-for-four
reverse stock split (the "Reverse Stock Split"). All per share data and
weighted average common shares outstanding have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect this change.
(3) Calculation excludes $51.8 million of preferred stock issued by
consolidated subsidiary.
(4) In 1995 the Bank recorded a $45 million loan portfolio charge in
connection with its adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See
Item 7. "MD&A--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
(5) Net of dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary of $1.6 million.
(6) Excludes the impact of the SAIF special assessment and net 1994
restructuring and recapitalization charges (the "1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization").
(7) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by
net interest income and noninterest income, excluding infrequent items,
provisions for estimated loan and real estate losses, direct costs of real
estate operations and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(8) Nonperforming assets ("NPAs") include nonaccruing loans and foreclosed
real estate, net of specific valuation allowances, writedowns and REO
general valuation allowance ("GVA"), if any.
(9) Includes 100% of Gateway investment product sales.
(10) Excludes loans sold in certain bulk sales consummated in 1994 (the "Bulk
Sales"), and is net of repurchases.
(11) All retail branch offices are located in Southern California.
For additional information, see Item 6. "Selected Financial Data," Item 7.
"MD&A" and Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data".
BUSINESS STRATEGY
The Company's business strategy is to be a consumer-focused provider of
financial services, by enhancing its franchise to integrate its traditional
services and products (deposit services, checking and savings accounts) with
the offering of investment products through Gateway and consumer credit
products through strategic partners. As a part of such strategy, management
continues to explore new opportunities to expand the integrated sales
platform, to increase fee income growth, and to build upon the use of
technology in delivering financial products and services. In addition, the
Company is continuing to focus on improving the quality of its loan portfolio
by reducing the level of problem assets through aggressive management and
increasing operating efficiency by reducing and maintaining lower levels of
operating expenses.
As a part of its business strategy, the Company plans to purchase assets
(loans and securities) that may exceed $900 million in 1997. This plan, in
general terms, is based upon certain risk adjusted return and liquidity
objectives and is designed to increase the Company's securities and loan
portfolios to enhance the Company's earning capabilities. The proposed
increase in earning assets may be at a lower interest rate spread than the
Company's assets are currently yielding depending on available financing
sources. Accordingly, if the plan is implemented, the Company's interest rate
spread may decline. In conjunction with this plan, the Company continues its
exploration of other asset origination capabilities and customer base
expansion. If such opportunities are pursued, they may operate to limit the
asset purchase strategy discussed above to an amount significantly less than
$900 million.
4
<PAGE>
Consumer-Focused Provider of Financial Services
Management believes that, given the highly competitive nature of the
financial services industry and the regulatory constraints that the Company
faces in competing with unregulated companies, the Company must continue to
expand from its historical business focus and provide customers with a wider
array of products through a variety of delivery channels. The Company is
pursuing the use of various electronic delivery systems, which include an
Internet bank, and software to enhance customer convenience and the Company's
fee income opportunities. The Company is currently negotiating with a provider
of electronic delivery services to begin implementing an Internet bank. The
Internet bank will offer on-line transactional capabilities for selected bank
services with plans to expand to the alternative investment products currently
sold through the Company's integrated sales platform.
Strategic Alliances with Third Party Providers
Through strategic alliances with third party providers, the Company has
introduced a wide range of securities and insurance products, and consumer
loan products to increase fee income. The use of strategic partners allows the
Company to emphasize or de-emphasize particular products based on consumer
demand and other business or market factors without the traditional costs of
modification or discontinuance of product lines. At this time, the Company
provides residential mortgages and consumer loans, which the Company does not
underwrite or fund, by referral to certain established providers of those
products with which the Company has negotiated strategic alliances. For the
year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's revenues from all investment and
credit product strategic alliances totaled $4.7 million.
Investment Product Channel
The Company has implemented its strategy to integrate sales of alternative
investment products along with traditional banking products in its offices.
The Company's investment product channel is responsible for providing the
retail bank distribution system with a variety of investment products to
satisfy customers' financial needs and objectives, such as mutual funds, fixed
and variable annuities, unit investment trusts and insurance products. Through
Gateway, the Company has developed strategic relationships with nationally
known providers of investment and insurance products. The use of strategic
partners' products shifts market acceptance risk away from the Company, and
enhances product and name recognition through relationships with nationally
known partners, which also provide marketing support. In 1997, the Company
plans to increase the line of insurance products offered through the
integrated sales platform to enhance the Company's fee income opportunities.
Credit Product Channel
The Company's credit product channel is responsible for providing the retail
bank distribution system with a variety of consumer credit products to satisfy
customers' financial needs and objectives. Strategic alliances are in place
with established providers of auto, boat and recreational vehicle loans,
credit cards, home equity lines of credit and first mortgage products. The
Company uses the strength of its strategic partners to attempt to minimize
product risk, operating expenses and development costs. The Company is
currently negotiating with strategic partners to create secured and other
credit card programs. These programs are expected to be offered initially to
the customers of the strategic partners generating a favorable interest rate
spread to the Company and will offer the opportunity to cross-sell products to
new customers. The strategic partners will identify credit card candidates and
market the programs; the Company will underwrite credit card candidates and
provide the funding of the credit card balances and the bank presence required
to accommodate the plan. The strategic partners will provide credit
enhancements on outstanding credit card balances to mitigate any credit losses
to the Company.
Management of Problem Assets
During the fourth quarter of 1995, the Bank adopted an Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan ("Plan") designed to aggressively dispose of, resolve or
otherwise manage a pool of primarily multifamily loans and REO that had
5
<PAGE>
higher risk profiles than the remainder of the Bank's multifamily loan
portfolio. The Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan reflected both an
acceleration in estimated timing of asset resolution, as well as a potential
change in recovery method from the normal course of business. See Item 7.
"MD&A--Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
During the fourth quarter of 1996, management evaluated the status of
certain classified loans based on specific criteria, including loan
performance for a minimum of 13 months. As a result, approximately
$124 million in gross classified multifamily loans were upgraded from
substandard to special mention. See "--Credit Administration--Loan Grading
System."
Continued Reduction of Operating Expenses
During the two years ended December 31, 1996, the Company reduced annual
operating expenses (excluding the SAIF special assessment of $18.0 million) by
21.4% which included a reduction in personnel expenses of 22.5% reflecting a
reduction in the annual average of full-time equivalent ("FTEs") employees of
23.6% (from 644 during 1995 to 492 during 1996).
While the Company intends to continue to control and, if possible, reduce
operating expenses, a portion of the expense savings experienced in prior
periods will be devoted to certain business initiatives described above. The
Company also intends to expend resources as it evaluates and pursues earning
asset acquisition opportunities. Furthermore, management does not believe that
additional significant personnel reductions would be appropriate without
significantly increasing operational risks. Accordingly, the levels of annual
operating expense reductions experienced during the past two years should not
be expected for future periods.
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP
Fidelity operates 33 branches in Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino
counties. At each of its branch locations, Fidelity offers loan products,
financial services and investment products to current and potential customers.
These products and services are provided either directly or through Gateway.
Fidelity's deposits are concentrated in Los Angeles and Orange counties. Five
branches exceed $100 million in deposits, fourteen branches have deposits
between $60 million and $100 million and fourteen of the branches are in the
$30 million to $60 million deposit range.
Total deposits at Fidelity have decreased $1.0 billion from December 31,
1992 to December 31, 1996. Management believes the decrease can be attributed
to five major factors. First, as a result of a profitability analysis of its
branch system conducted by the Bank in 1994, the Bank determined that nine
branch offices were marginally profitable. Consequently, these nine branches
were sold, resulting in a reduction of deposits of approximately $340 million.
Second, during 1994 approximately $150 million in non-retail (wholesale)
deposits matured at interest rates that were no longer desirable to the Bank.
The maturing of these high interest rate deposits, particularly in light of
the strategy of the Bank's management to fund the Bank utilizing retail
deposits, resulted in the runoff of the approximately $150 million in non-
retail deposits. Third, the market for deposits in Southern California is
highly competitive and the Bank's strategy during this period was to price
deposits based on the average rate for similar products offered by the Bank's
local competitors. This, along with the Bank's relatively low advertising
expenditures, has contributed to its reduction in deposits. Fourth, during the
1980s, there had been significant marketing efforts to attract retirement plan
accounts, such as IRAs, to Fidelity. However, Fidelity subsequently determined
that the pricing of retirement plan accounts compared to other alternatives
for deposits made retirement plan accounts an unattractive source of capital.
In contrast to some of its competitors, Fidelity was not willing to waive
annual fees for such retirement plan accounts. As a result, approximately $199
million in retirement plan deposits were withdrawn from the Bank. Finally, the
declining interest rate environment has made insured savings deposit products
unattractive relative to uninsured products, such as mutual funds. Of the
total net deposit outflow in 1996, $21.5 million was in transaction accounts
and $83.6 million was in certificate of deposit accounts. The Company may
consider exploring potential sales or purchases of branches from time to time
to further its business strategy.
6
<PAGE>
LENDING ACTIVITIES
The Bank closed its wholesale correspondent single family origination
network and its multifamily origination operations in the third quarter of
1994. Since that time the Bank has entered into strategic partnerships with
established providers of consumer credit products pursuant to which all
consumer credit products made available to the Bank's customers are referred
to and underwritten, funded and serviced by the strategic partners. See "--
Business Strategy--Strategic Alliances with Third Party Providers."
Despite having closed its origination operations in 1994, the Bank
originated $18.5 million in first and second trust deed mortgages in 1995 in
connection with prior commitments to originate loans that had not yet been
funded, in connection with the sale of the Bank's former headquarters building
to Citadel and in connection with the sale of REO. In 1996, the Bank
originated $5.8 million in first and second trust deed mortgages, principally
in connection with the sale of REO.
The Bank offers overdraft protection for checking account customers through
its "Instant Reserve" personal line of credit. Instant Reserve is available to
new and existing checking customers with average credit limits of
approximately $1,500. The committed Instant Reserve lines of credit at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 totaled $19.7 million and $18.5 million,
respectively. The outstanding balance of Instant Reserve lines of credit at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 totaled $2.0 million and $1.8 million,
respectively.
Portfolio statistics
All presentations of the total loan portfolio include loans receivable and
loans held for sale unless stated otherwise. The following table sets forth
the composition of total loans by type of security at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL
LOANS BY TYPE OF SECURITY AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
- ------------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential
loans:
Single family... $ 517,288 18.72% $ 594,019 19.58% $ 755,253 22.44% $ 792,054 20.80% $ 857,631 21.09%
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.. 319,281 11.55 345,884 11.40 393,943 11.71 505,219 13.27 526,826 12.96
5 to 36 units. 1,408,317 50.95 1,521,056 50.13 1,612,926 47.93 1,795,374 47.16 1,880,589 46.25
37 units and
over......... 307,741 11.13 329,916 10.87 345,287 10.26 406,330 10.67 444,576 10.93
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total
multifamily. 2,035,339 73.63 2,196,856 72.40 2,352,156 69.90 2,706,923 71.10 2,851,991 70.14
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total
residential
loans..... 2,552,627 92.35 2,790,875 91.98 3,107,409 92.34 3,498,977 91.90 3,709,622 91.23
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Other real estate
loans:
Commercial and
industrial..... 203,510 7.36 234,384 7.72 248,255 7.38 295,761 7.77 343,270 8.44
Land and land
improvements... 1,670 0.06 3,032 0.10 2,050 0.06 3,736 0.10 5,353 0.13
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total other
real estate
loans........ 205,180 7.42 237,416 7.82 250,305 7.44 299,497 7.87 348,623 8.57
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Gross mortgage
loans........... 2,757,807 99.77 3,028,291 99.80 3,357,714 99.78 3,798,474 99.77 4,058,245 99.80
Loans secured by
savings accounts
and other non-
real estate
loans........... 6,373 0.23 6,040 0.20 7,251 0.22 8,758 0.23 8,038 0.20
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total loans,
gross........... 2,764,180 100.00% 3,034,331 100.00% 3,364,965 100.00% 3,807,232 100.00% 4,066,283 100.00%
---------- ====== ---------- ====== ---------- ====== ---------- ====== ---------- ======
Less:
Undisbursed loan
funds.......... -- -- 259 -- 301
Unearned
discounts...... 1,974 2,463 1,980 210 104
Deferred loan
fees........... 12,767 7,317 7,221 11,139 11,152
Allowance for
estimated loan
losses......... 57,508(1) 89,435(1) 67,202 83,832 64,277
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
72,249 99,215 76,662 95,181 75,834
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total loans,
net.......... $2,691,931 $2,935,116 $3,288,303 $3,712,051 $3,990,449
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- -------
(1) At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the allowance for estimated loan losses
includes $16.7 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of remaining loan
GVA and specific valuation allowance ("SVA") for the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "MD&A--Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan."
7
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the composition of loans held for sale, which
are included in the table above, by type of security at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
--------------- --------------- ---------------- ----------------- ----------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
LOANS BY TYPE OF SECURITY AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL AMOUNT OF TOTAL
- ------------------------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential loans:
Single family........... $-- -- % $-- -- % $47,339 97.98% $239,371 65.10% $25,043 94.57%
Multifamily (2 to 4
units)................. -- -- -- -- 976 2.02 128,317 34.90 1,439 5.43
---- --- ---- --- ------- ------ -------- ------ ------- ------
Total loans held for
sale.................. $-- -- % $-- -- % $48,315 100.00% $367,688 100.00% $26,482 100.00%
==== === ==== === ======= ====== ======== ====== ======= ======
</TABLE>
The following table presents gross mortgage loans by type and location as of
December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMERCIAL AND
MULTIFAMILY INDUSTRIAL
---------------------------- ----------------
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS HOTEL/ OTHER PERCENTAGE
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER MOTEL C&I TOTAL OF TOTAL
-------- -------- ---------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles.......... $252,444 $118,977 $1,024,097 $206,579 $11,401 $ 96,317 $1,709,815 62.0%
Orange............... 84,672 129,974 152,674 22,013 20,592 39,316 449,241 16.3
San Diego............ 22,645 10,125 80,798 33,850 -- 6,143 153,561 5.6
San Bernardino....... 11,658 12,477 25,614 13,633 -- 3,975 67,357 2.4
Riverside............ 16,870 8,008 22,593 10,357 -- 5,843 63,671 2.3
Ventura.............. 20,055 5,488 29,906 2,429 -- 1,321 59,199 2.1
Other................ 11,618 8,029 23,840 7,183 2,497 3,811 56,978 2.1
419,962 293,078 1,359,522 296,044 34,490 156,726 2,559,822 92.8
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara.......... 37,490 19,165 32,854 -- -- 209 89,718 3.3
Other................ 59,015 7,038 15,941 7,366 1,320 3,907 94,587 3.4
-------- -------- ---------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- -----
Total California... 516,467 319,281 1,408,317 303,410 35,810 160,842 2,744,127 99.5
-------- -------- ---------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- -----
Arizona................. 23 -- -- 4,331 -- 5,955 10,309 0.4
Maryland................ -- -- -- -- 2,186 -- 2,186 0.1
All other states........ 798 -- -- -- -- 387 1,185 --
-------- -------- ---------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- -----
Total out-of-state. 821 -- -- 4,331 2,186 6,342 13,680 0.5
-------- -------- ---------- -------- ------- -------- ---------- -----
Gross mortgage loans.... $517,288 $319,281 $1,408,317 $307,741 $37,996 $167,184 $2,757,807 100.0%
======== ======== ========== ======== ======= ======== ========== =====
</TABLE>
8
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the types of loans by repricing attributes at
the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL OF TOTAL
AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Adjustable rate
loans............. $2,675,425 96.79% $2,939,807 96.88% $3,257,368 96.80% $3,649,714 95.83% $3,924,093 96.50%
Fixed rate loans... 88,755 3.21 94,524 3.12 107,597 3.20 157,518 4.17 142,190 3.50
---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------
Total loans,
gross............ 2,764,180 100.00% 3,034,331 100.00% 3,364,965 100.00% 3,807,232 100.00% 4,066,283 100.00%
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Less:
Undisbursed loan
funds............ -- -- 259 -- 301
Unearned
discounts........ 1,974 2,463 1,980 210 104
Deferred loan
fees............. 12,767 7,317 7,221 11,139 11,152
Allowance for
estimated loan
losses........... 57,508(1) 89,435(1) 67,202 83,832 64,277
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
72,249 99,215 76,662 95,181 75,834
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total loans,
net............ $2,691,931 $2,935,116 $3,288,303 $3,712,051 $3,990,449
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- -------
(1) At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the allowance for estimated loan losses
includes $16.7 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of remaining loan
GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "MD&A--
Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
9
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth, by contractual maturity and interest rate,
the fixed rate and adjustable rate real estate loan portfolios at December 31,
1996. The table does not consider the prepayment experience of the loan
portfolio when scheduling the maturities of loans. See Item 7. "MD&A--
Asset/Liability Management."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBTOTAL
MATURITIES MATURES IN
TOTAL GREATER -----------------------------------------------------
LOANS MATURES THAN ONE 2000- 2002- 2007-
RECEIVABLE IN 1997 YEAR 1998 1999 2001 2006 2011 AFTER 2011
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Adjustable rate loans:
Under 5.00%............ $ 550 $ -- $ 550 $ 19 $ -- $ -- $ 17 $ 28 $ 486
05.00%-6.99%........... 56,252 172 56,080 -- -- -- 557 1,052 54,471
07.00%-8.99%........... 2,571,233 1,041 2,570,192 8,555 10,364 101,502 480,793 208,795 1,760,183
09.00%-10.99%.......... 46,561 167 46,394 303 -- 14,019 6,272 8,808 16,992
11.00%-12.99%.......... 829 -- 829 146 -- 498 185 -- --
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total adjustable rate
loans............... 2,675,425 1,380 2,674,045 9,023 10,364 116,019 487,824 218,683 1,832,132
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Fixed rate loans:
Under 5.00%............ 557 265 292 192 -- -- -- -- 100
05.00%-6.99%........... 12,636 2,451 10,185 1,269 23 -- 58 2,114 6,721
07.00%-8.99%........... 38,278 1,206 37,072 855 346 543 6,731 3,051 25,546
09.00%-10.99%.......... 31,359 6,406 24,953 -- 74 426 7,582 9,082 7,789
11.00%-12.99%.......... 3,137 788 2,349 131 2 13 125 637 1,441
Over 13.00%............ 2,788 2,008 780 88 -- -- 58 586 48
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total fixed rate
loans............... 88,755 13,124 75,631 2,535 445 982 14,554 15,470 41,645
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total loans, gross... 2,764,180 $14,504 $2,749,676 $11,558 $10,809 $117,001 $502,378 $234,153 $1,873,777
======= ========== ======= ======= ======== ======== ======== ==========
Less:
Undisbursed loan
funds................. --
Unearned discounts..... 1,974
Deferred loan fees..... 12,767
Allowance for
estimated loan
losses................ 57,508(1)
----------
72,249
----------
Total loans, net..... $2,691,931
==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) At December 31, 1996, the allowance for estimated loan losses includes
$16.7 million of remaining loan GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "MD&A--Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan."
10
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth, by contractual maturity and property type,
the real estate loan portfolio at December 31, 1996. The table does not
consider the prepayment experience of the loan portfolio when scheduling the
maturities of loans. See Item 7. "MD&A--Asset/Liability Management."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBTOTAL
MATURITIES MATURES IN
TOTAL GREATER -----------------------------------------------------
LOANS MATURES THAN ONE 2000- 2002- 2007-
RECEIVABLE IN 1997 YEAR 1998 1999 2001 2006 2011 AFTER 2011
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Residential loans:
Single family.......... $ 517,288 $ 3,523 $ 513,765 $ 2,052 $ 146 $ 4,229 $ 6,449 $ 13,837 $ 487,052
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units......... 319,281 20 319,261 244 22 11,430 5,391 2,612 299,562
5 to 36 units........ 1,408,317 847 1,407,470 684 722 49,497 301,960 177,567 877,040
37 units and over.... 307,741 254 307,487 -- -- 3,584 71,535 36,154 196,214
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total multifamily.. 2,035,339 1,121 2,034,218 928 744 64,511 378,886 216,333 1,372,816
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total residential
loans............ 2,552,627 4,644 2,547,983 2,980 890 68,740 385,335 230,170 1,859,868
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Other real estate loans:
Commercial and
industrial............ 203,510 1,965 201,545 8,432 9,917 48,261 117,043 3,983 13,909
Land and land
improvements.......... 1,670 1,524 146 146 -- -- -- -- --
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total other real
estate loans........ 205,180 3,489 201,691 8,578 9,917 48,261 117,043 3,983 13,909
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Gross mortgage loans.... 2,757,807 8,133 2,749,674 11,558 10,807 117,001 502,378 234,153 1,873,777
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Loans secured by savings
accounts and other non-
real estate loans...... 6,373 6,371 2 -- 2 -- -- -- --
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total loans, gross...... 2,764,180 $14,504 $2,749,676 $11,558 $10,809 $117,001 $502,378 $234,153 $1,873,777
======= ========== ======= ======= ======== ======== ======== ==========
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds. --
Unearned discounts..... 1,974
Deferred loan fees..... 12,767
Allowance for estimated
loan losses........... 57,508(1)
----------
72,249
----------
Total loans, net..... $2,691,931
==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) At December 31, 1996, the allowance for estimated loan losses includes
$16.7 million of remaining loan GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "MD&A--Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan."
11
<PAGE>
The following table details the activity in the loan portfolio for the
periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Principal balance at
beginning of period.... $2,935,116 $3,288,303 $3,712,051 $3,990,449 $4,548,457
Real estate loans
originated:
Conventional:
Single family....... -- 3,411 238,944 271,316 261,563
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units...... -- 515 38,100 42,931 29,931
5 to 36 units..... 1,673 4,743 68,862 89,935 121,940
37 units and over. 3,628 3,207 65,940 12,887 19,588
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total
multifamily.... 5,301 8,465 172,902 145,753 171,459
Commercial and
industrial......... 533 6,586 5,597 1,335 993
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans
originated(1).... 5,834 18,462 417,443 418,404 434,015
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Real estate loans
purchased:
Single family(2)...... 7,444 (1,237) 100,756 -- --
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........ 319 -- 250 -- --
5 to 36 units....... -- -- 2,466 3,741 241
37 units and over... -- -- 665 -- 1,434
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total multifamily. 319 -- 3,381 3,741 1,675
Commercial and
industrial........... 262 2,171 -- 210 --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans purchased.. 8,025 934 104,137 3,951 1,675
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total real estate
loans funded....... 13,859 19,396 521,580 422,355 435,690
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Loans sold or
securitized:
Whole loans........... (4,508) (123,080) (326,797) (137,870) (319,914)
Bulk Sales............ -- -- (341,432) -- --
Repurchases........... 6,577 9,850 9,072 22,867 1,202
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total loans sold or
securitized........ 2,069 (113,230) (659,157) (115,003) (318,712)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Payments and refinances. (286,577) (236,650) (310,697) (575,348) (672,996)
Increase (decrease) in
non-real estate loans.. 333 (1,211) (1,507) 720 257
Other (decrease)
increase in total
loans, net............. (4,796) 741 9,403 8,433 9,656
Decrease (increase) in
reserves for loan
losses................. 31,927 (22,233) 16,630 (19,555) (11,903)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net decrease in total
loans, net.............. (243,185) (353,187) (423,748) (278,398) (558,008)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Principal balance at end
of period.............. $2,691,931 $2,935,116 $3,288,303 $3,712,051 $3,990,449
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Loans serviced for
others................. $ 433,767 $ 600,288 $1,147,015 $ 888,362 $ 982,698
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes loans originated to finance sales of REO of $4.8 million, $9.0
million, $27.0 million, $51.6 million, and $11.2 million for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, and 1992, respectively.
(2) Net of repurchases.
12
<PAGE>
Sale of Loans
Over the past several years, the Bank has sold a portion of its loans in the
secondary mortgage market. During 1996, the Bank sold $4.5 million of loans
and repurchased $6.6 million of loans sold in prior periods as described
below. Net loan sales totaled approximately $0.4 million and $273.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. In addition,
sales of mortgage backed securities ("MBSs") totaled $65.5 million,
$160.7 million, and $137.1 million, for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively. In addition to loan sales in the normal course of
business, the Bank consummated loan bulk sales during 1994 of $563.3 million
of NPAs and other problem assets. See "--Bulk Sales." Fidelity is an approved
originator and servicer for the Federal National Mortgage Association (the
"FNMA"), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (the "FHLMC") and the
Federal Housing Administration (the "FHA").
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had certain loans with a gross
principal balance of $90.3 million, of which $75.5 million had been sold in
the form of mortgage pass-through certificates, over various periods of time,
to four investor financial institutions leaving a balance of $14.8 million in
loans retained by the Company. These mortgage pass-through certificates
provide a credit enhancement to the investors in the form of the Company's
subordination of its retained percentage interest to that of the investors. In
this regard, the aggregate of $75.5 million held by the investors are deemed
Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates and the $14.8 million in loans held
by the Company are subordinated to the Senior Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates in the event of borrower default. Full recovery of the $14.8
million is subject to this contingent liability due to its subordination. In
1993, the Bank repurchased as an investment a portion of the mortgage pass-
through certificates, and at December 31, 1996, the balance of the repurchased
certificate was $25.9 million and was included in the mortgage-backed
securities available for sale portfolio and accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 115. The other Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates totaling
$49.6 million at December 31, 1996 are owned by other investor institutions.
Charge-offs resulting from the subordination of the Company's retained
percentage interest have been $0.1 million, $4.3 million and $0.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Due to the
subordination of the retained percentage interest, the Company considers all
the loans underlying the Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates in
determining its allowance for loan losses and any estimated losses are
reflected in the provision for loan losses.
During 1992, the Company also effected the securitization by FNMA of $114.3
million of multifamily mortgages wherein $114.3 million in whole loans were
swapped for Triple A rated MBSs through FNMA's Alternative Credit Enhancement
Structure ("ACES") program. These MBSs were sold in December 1993 and the
current outstanding balance as of December 31, 1996 of $78.0 million is
serviced by the Company.
As part of a credit enhancement to absorb losses relating to the ACES
transaction, the Company has pledged and placed in a trust account, as of
December 31, 1996, $13.3 million, comprised of $7.6 million in cash and $5.7
million in U.S. Treasury securities at book value. The Company shall absorb
losses, if any, which may be incurred on the securitized multifamily loans to
the extent of $12.8 million. FNMA is responsible for any losses in excess of
the $12.8 million. The Company has charged-off $3.8 million, $3.7 million and
$3.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. The corresponding contingent liability for credit losses secured
by the trust assets was $6.6 million and $3.8 million at December 31, 1996 and
1995, respectively, and is included in other liabilities.
Sale of Servicing
As a cost reduction measure, the Bank sold the servicing rights to
substantially all of the single family and 2-4 unit loans in the Bank's loan
portfolio during the second quarter of 1996. The servicing rights to
$938.5 million in loans were transferred for a total sale price of
$10.0 million. Such sales proceeds have been accounted for as a reduction in
the carrying value of the loans based on the relative fair values of the
servicing sold and loans retained and is to be accreted over the estimated
life of the loans. Accretion of this amount of the deferred revenue totaled
$1.5 million during 1996.
ARM Loans
Prior to the closure of its mortgage origination operation in the third
quarter of 1994, Fidelity emphasized the origination of adjustable rate
mortgages ("ARMs") for its portfolio to assist in reducing the sensitivity of
its
13
<PAGE>
earnings to interest rate fluctuations. ARMs help to improve the matching of
interest rate repricing between Fidelity's asset and liability portfolios.
ARMs reduce the interest rate risk inherent in a portfolio of long-term
mortgages by repricing each individual asset at regular intervals over the
life of the asset. The initial period before the first adjustment varies
between one month and five years. ARM loans represented 97% of the total loan
portfolio at December 31, 1996. Of Fidelity's ARMs, 93% bear an interest rate
which periodically adjusts at a stated margin (the "contractual spread") above
the Federal Home Loan Bank (the "FHLB") Eleventh District Cost of Funds Index
("COFI"), which is the index that most closely matches Fidelity's liability
base.
ARMs may have greater vulnerability to default than fixed rate loans during
times of increasing interest rates due to the potential for substantial
increases in the amount of a borrower's payments or erosion of a borrower's
equity in the underlying property, to the extent payments do not increase, as
in the case of negatively amortizing mortgages. Risks of default may be
reduced on certain loans by caps on both the maximum interest that can be
charged and the amount by which a borrower's payments can be periodically
increased. However, during periods of significant interest rate increases,
interest rate caps can adversely affect interest rate margins and payment caps
can increase borrower exposure to negative amortization, unless the loan
contains a prohibition on negative amortization. When the borrower's payment
is not sufficient to cover the computed interest amount, negative amortization
occurs and the difference then increases the principal balance of the loan.
Fidelity uses a combination of interest rate caps and payment caps to reduce
risk of default and, to date, negative amortization has not adversely affected
Fidelity's default ratios. There was $0.8 million of negative amortization
included in the loan portfolio at December 31, 1996 and $1.3 million at
December 31, 1995.
During periods of declining interest rates, ARMs with high interest rate
caps relative to market are vulnerable to prepayment as borrowers refinance
into ARMs with lower caps or into fixed rate loans. Fidelity has also
attempted to minimize the risk of default associated with all ARMs by using
the COFI (a relatively stable index) for adjustment, thereby limiting interest
rate volatility over short periods, and requiring loan-to-value ratios
generally not in excess of 80% unless private mortgage insurance is obtained.
During periods of declining interest rates, ARMs with negative amortization
potential will experience accelerated amortization, thereby offsetting, in
whole or in part, previously incurred negative amortization, if any, or
reducing the principal balance ahead of the original schedule.
CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
The credit administration function identifies, measures and establishes
specific valuation allowances and assesses and establishes the allowance for
loan losses in conformity with regulatory guidelines and generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP"). See "--Credit Loss Experience."
Loan Grading System
In the second half of 1995, the Bank enhanced its existing policy of
specifically identifying loans in the portfolio through implementation of a
loan grading system ("LGS") that management believes improved the grading
process. Since implementing the LGS in the latter half of 1995, over 82% of
the multifamily and non-residential loan portfolios have been reviewed. The
evaluation of each loan is based on four key risk attributes: (1) ability of
income from the property to act as the primary source of repayment, (2) value
of the collateral if a sale is required, (3) ability and willingness of the
borrower to pay, and (4) market trends in the area around the property.
In the four quarters following the initial implementation of the LGS, this
process resulted in increasing levels of classified loans. During the fourth
quarter of 1996, management evaluated the classification of multifamily loans
that showed favorable performance characteristics despite an adverse
classification at the initial implementation of the LGS and determined to
upgrade the classification of certain loans, which generally exhibited
continuing performance for at least 13 months (November 1995 through December
1996) and for which delinquent taxes, if any, did not exceed 3.0% of the gross
loan balance.
14
<PAGE>
As a result of these evaluations, approximately $124 million in gross
balances of classified multifamily loans were upgraded to special mention. The
upgraded loans had been performing for between 18-24 months (prior to and
after adverse classification). An additional $12.4 million in gross classified
loans comprised primarily of 1-4 unit mortgage loans were also upgraded to
either special mention or pass. The bank upgraded performing loans totaling
$136.4 million. As a result of upgrading certain loans, approximately $4.7
million in SVAs associated with these loans were reversed and returned to the
GVA. At year-end 1996, net classified assets represented 5.2% of total assets
as compared to 9.42% as of the prior quarter-end. Within classified assets,
net classified loans at year-end 1996, totaled $147.4 million, a decline of
48% compared to net classified loans at September 30, 1996 of $285.4 million.
In addition, of the $147.4 million of total net classified loans, 75% or
$111.2 million were performing. At December 31, 1996, net classified loans
represented 63% of tangible capital plus GVA.
Loan Portfolio Risk Elements
Fidelity's loan portfolio risk elements and credit loss experience may be
more clearly understood when the following sections are read in conjunction
with Item 7. "MD&A--Asset Quality."
The following table presents net delinquent loans at December 31, 1996, by
property type and location.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY
-----------------------
COMMERCIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS AND
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
------- ------ ------- -------- ---------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles............. $ 9,686 $2,955 $21,677 $5,131 $2,094 $41,543
Orange.................. 2,984 3,366 2,387 -- 453 9,190
San Diego............... 333 221 2,228 -- -- 2,782
San Bernardino.......... 500 784 1,239 -- -- 2,523
Riverside............... 571 250 812 -- -- 1,633
Santa Barbara........... 565 310 -- -- -- 875
Kern.................... 93 -- 755 -- -- 848
Ventura................. 291 -- 301 -- -- 592
------- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
15,023 7,886 29,399 5,131 2,547 59,986
------- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara............. 188 674 419 -- -- 1,281
San Mateo............... 280 212 -- -- -- 492
San Francisco........... 271 -- -- -- -- 271
Alameda................. 237 -- -- -- -- 237
Santa Cruz.............. 213 -- -- -- -- 213
------- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
1,189 886 419 -- -- 2,494
------- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Total delinquent
loans................ $16,212 $8,772 $29,818 $5,131 $2,547 $62,480
======= ====== ======= ====== ====== =======
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
The following table presents delinquencies as a percentage of the loan
portfolio by property type and location at December 31, 1996, with ratios
calculated net of specific reserves and writedowns.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY
-----------------------
COMMERCIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS AND
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
------ ------ ------- -------- ---------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California:
Southern California Counties:
Los Angeles................ 3.9% 2.5% 2.1% 2.5% 2.0% 2.5%
Orange..................... 3.5% 2.6% 1.6% -- 0.8% 2.1%
San Diego.................. 1.5% 2.2% 2.8% -- -- 1.8%
San Bernardino............. 4.4% 6.8% 5.0% -- -- 3.8%
Riverside.................. 3.4% 3.2% 3.7% -- -- 2.6%
Santa Barbara.............. 5.5% 3.9% -- -- -- 2.1%
Kern....................... 14.5% -- 16.2% -- -- 7.3%
Ventura.................... 1.5% -- 1.0% -- -- 1.0%
Percent of Southern
California delinquencies
by property type.......... 3.6% 2.7% 2.2% 1.7% 1.4% 2.4%
Northern California Counties:
Santa Clara................ 0.5% 3.5% 1.3% -- -- 1.4%
San Mateo.................. 2.6% 15.3% -- -- -- 3.0%
San Francisco.............. 11.7% -- -- -- -- 5.1%
Alameda.................... 1.8% -- -- -- -- 1.3%
Santa Cruz................. 5.5% -- -- -- -- 2.8%
Percent of Northern
California delinquencies
by property type.......... 1.2% 3.4% 0.9% -- -- 1.4%
Percent of total
delinquencies by property
type........................ 3.2% 2.8% 2.1% 1.7% 1.3% 2.3%
</TABLE>
The following table presents net delinquent loans at December 31, 1996, by
property type and year of origination.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1987
AND
TOTAL 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 PRIOR
------- ---- ---- ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Property type:
Single Family.......... $16,212 $-- $-- $2,869 $2,985 $500 $ 870 $ 3,476 $1,283 $1,435 $ 2,794
Multifamily loans:
2 to 4 units......... 8,772 -- -- 212 395 -- 1,418 2,667 1,762 1,904 414
5 to 36 units........ 29,818 -- -- -- 834 333 5,318 11,234 4,124 4,038 3,937
37 units and over.... 5,131 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,006 -- -- 4,125
------- ---- ---- ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Total multifamily.. 43,721 -- -- 212 1,229 333 6,736 14,907 5,886 5,942 8,476
Commercial and other... 2,547 -- -- -- -- 146 -- -- 833 -- 1,568
------- ---- ---- ------ ------ ---- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Total Delinquent
loans............... $62,480 $-- $-- $3,081 $4,214 $979 $7,606 $18,383 $8,002 $7,377 $12,838
======= ==== ==== ====== ====== ==== ====== ======= ====== ====== =======
Percent of net
delinquent loans to
remaining portfolio. 2.3% -- -- 1.1% 2.4% 0.6% 4.2% 3.7% 2.4% 1.8% 1.9%
======= ==== ==== ====== ====== ==== ====== ======= ====== ====== =======
</TABLE>
16
<PAGE>
The following tables present net delinquent loans at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996
------------ ------------- -------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total delinquencies:
30 to 59 days................ $14,959 $22,748 $23,467 $ 17,135
60 to 89 days................ 11,668 8,260 8,026 9,552
90 days and over............. 35,853 36,249 43,292 40,111
------- ------- ------- --------
$62,480 $67,257 $74,785 $ 66,798
======= ======= ======= ========
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
1995 1995 1995 1995
------------ ------------- -------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total delinquencies:
30 to 59 days................ $12,727 $17,963 $ 9,567 $ 19,323
60 to 89 days................ 7,220 8,379 10,343 11,295
90 days and over(1).......... 51,910 54,313 64,827 70,519
------- ------- ------- --------
$71,857 $80,655 $84,737 $101,137
======= ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes two loans on one hotel property with a total balance of $15.9
million in 1995.
The following table details net loans which are 30 to 89 days delinquent at
the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Loans 30 to 59 days contractually
delinquent:
Single family....................... $ 4,986 $ 4,283 $ 4,413 $ 7,480 $ 7,939
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units...................... 1,023 1,748 4,281 3,599 1,432
5 to 36 units..................... 5,617 5,434 15,438 16,948 15,927
37 units and over................. 2,461 304 -- 4,114 5,623
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total multifamily............... 9,101 7,486 19,719 24,661 22,982
Commercial and industrial........... 872 958 264 2,048 1,807
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
14,959 12,727 24,396 34,189 32,728
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Loans 60 to 89 days contractually
delinquent:
Single family....................... 3,479 924 1,016 2,497 3,665
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units...................... 1,790 282 904 1,707 1,180
5 to 36 units..................... 6,130 5,801 5,247 12,770 9,241
37 units and over................. -- -- 2,272 5,035 1,223
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total multifamily............... 7,920 6,083 8,423 19,512 11,644
Commercial and industrial........... 269 213 1,385 1,723 --
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
11,668 7,220 10,824 23,732 15,309
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total loans delinquent 30 to 89
days........................... $26,627 $19,947 $35,220 $57,921 $48,037
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
Nonaccruing Loans
The Bank places a loan on nonaccrual status whenever the payment of interest
is 90 or more days delinquent, or earlier if management determines that it is
warranted. Loans on nonaccrual status are resolved by the borrower bringing
the loan current, by the Bank and the borrower agreeing to modify the terms of
the loan or by foreclosure of the collateral securing the loan. See "--
Restructured Loans" and "--Foreclosure Policies."
The following table presents net nonaccruing loans by property type at the
dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family................... $ 8,019 $ 7,226 $ 7,775 $12,661 $ 14,064
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.................. 5,959 6,671 6,590 15,652 6,372
5 to 36 units................. 18,071 14,312 23,112 34,746 37,501
37 units and over............. 2,671 3,190 7,088 17,973 35,357
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Total multifamily............... 26,701 24,173 36,790 68,371 79,230
Commercial and industrial....... 1,405 20,511(1) 27,049(1) 12,443 18,747
------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Total nonaccruing loans....... $36,125 $51,910 $71,614 $93,475 $112,041
======= ======= ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes two loans on one hotel property with a total balance of $15.9
million at December 31, 1995 and one loan on the same hotel property with
a balance of $13.8 million at December 31, 1994.
It is the Bank's policy to reserve all earned but unpaid interest on loans
placed on nonaccrual status. The reduction in income related to such reserves,
net of interest recognized on cured delinquencies, was $6.0 million, $5.8
million, and $10.9 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and
1994, respectively.
The following table presents net nonaccruing loans by property type and
geographic location at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY
-----------------------
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS COMMERCIAL PERCENTAGE
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER AND INDUSTRIAL TOTAL OF TOTAL
------ ------ ------- -------- -------------- ------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles......... $5,217 $1,493 $13,501 $2,671 $1,260 $24,142 66.8%
Orange.............. 1,515 2,844 1,090 -- 145 5,594 15.5
San Diego........... 242 -- 1,530 -- -- 1,772 4.9
San Bernardino...... 313 681 47 -- -- 1,041 2.9
Kern................ 93 -- 755 -- -- 848 2.3
Riverside........... 165 250 428 -- -- 843 2.3
Ventura............. 54 -- 301 -- -- 355 1.0
Santa Barbara....... -- 310 -- -- -- 310 0.9
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- -----
7,599 5,578 17,652 2,671 1,405 34,905 96.6
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- -----
Northern California
Counties:
Santa Clara......... 183 381 419 -- -- 983 2.7
Alameda............. 237 -- -- -- -- 237 0.7
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- -----
420 381 419 -- -- 1,220 3.4
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- -----
Total nonaccruing
loans.............. $8,019 $5,959 $18,071 $2,671 $1,405 $36,125 100.0%
====== ====== ======= ====== ====== ======= =====
</TABLE>
18
<PAGE>
Restructured Loans
The Bank will consider modifying the terms of a loan when the borrower is
experiencing financial difficulty and the Bank determines that the loan, as
modified, is likely to result in a greater ultimate recovery to the Bank than
taking title to the property.
According to SFAS No. 15, "Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled
Debt Restructuring," a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") occurs when a
creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor's difficulties,
grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.
Generally, Fidelity restructures loans by temporarily or permanently reducing
interest rates, allowing interest only payments, reducing the loan balance,
extending property tax repayment plans, extending maturity dates or recasting
principal and interest payments. However, debt restructuring is not
necessarily a troubled debt restructuring even if the borrower is experiencing
some difficulties, as long as the restructuring terms are consistent with
current market rates and risk. The adoption of SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," as amended by SFAS No. 118, "Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan--Income Recognition and Disclosures,"
requires that TDRs be measured for impairment in the same manner as any
impaired loan. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect
all amounts due (contractual interest and principal) according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement.
The following table presents TDRs by property type at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Property type:
Single family...................... $ 1,178 $ 1,162 $ 459 $ 633 $ 3,160
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units....................... 4,260 2,597 2,511 3,171 4,065
5 to 36 units...................... 11,647 15,189 35,347 13,648 20,404
37 units and over.................. 5,805 9,109 10,292 11,090 54,108
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total multifamily................ 21,712 26,895 48,150 27,909 78,577
Commercial and industrial............ 22,306(1) 3,688 1,645 -- 5,567
Land................................. -- 946 1,890 171 --
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total TDRs....................... $45,196 $32,691 $52,144 $28,713 $87,304
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes a hotel property loan with a balance of $18.4 million at December
31, 1996.
The following table presents TDRs at December 31, 1996 by property type and
geographic location.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY
----------------------- COMMERCIAL
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS AND PERCENTAGE
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER INDUSTRIAL TOTAL OF TOTAL
------ ------ ------- -------- ---------- ------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Southern California:
Los Angeles........... $ 765 $2,102 $ 7,369 $4,832 $ -- $15,068 33.3%
Orange................ 342 2,032 2,895 -- 20,134(1) 25,403 56.2
San Diego............. -- -- 248 973 -- 1,221 2.7
Riverside............. 71 126 339 -- -- 536 1.2
Ventura............... -- -- 796 -- -- 796 1.8
------ ------ ------- ------ ------- ------- -----
1,178 4,260 11,647 5,805 20,134 43,024 95.2
------ ------ ------- ------ ------- ------- -----
Northern California:
Sacramento............ -- -- -- -- 2,172 2,172 4.8
------ ------ ------- ------ ------- ------- -----
Total TDRs.......... $1,178 $4,260 $11,647 $5,805 $22,306 $45,196 100.0%
====== ====== ======= ====== ======= ======= =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes a hotel property loan with a balance of $18.4 million at December
31, 1996.
19
<PAGE>
Loan Monitoring
The Bank has a loan review system that is designed to meet the following
objectives:
. To identify, in a timely manner, loans with potential credit or
collateral weaknesses and to appropriately classify loans with well
defined weaknesses that jeopardize loan repayment so that timely
action can be taken and credit losses can be mitigated.
. To project relevant trends that affect the collectibility of the loan
portfolio and to isolate potential problem areas that may exhibit
adverse trends.
. To provide essential information to assess the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses and to identify and recognize in a timely
manner estimated specific loan losses.
. To assess the adequacy of and adherence to the Bank's internal credit
policies and loan administration procedures and to monitor compliance
with the foregoing and with relevant laws and regulations.
The Bank considers such risk factors as payment history, collateral value,
income property cash flow, property condition, and the borrower's financial
capacity and property management experience in its monitoring and risk grading
process. Current property operating statements are requested on a periodic
basis for substantially all income property collateral and property
inspections are conducted. The assignment of loan grades in the Bank's asset
review process is subjective and greatly dependent upon having current and
accurate information regarding the borrower's financial capability and
willingness to repay the debt as well as the collateral property's condition,
operating results and fair value. If current and accurate data is not
available, it is critical to have current knowledge of the general economic
conditions affecting the borrower and the collateral property.
Although these general key information elements are desired for accurate
loan grading, the Bank is required to assign loan grades notwithstanding the
lack of any one or more of these elements. Loan grading decisions are made
using judgment based on the best and most current information available
including, but not limited to, the borrower's payment history with the Bank on
all existing credits, real estate property tax and hazard insurance payment
records, the borrower's payment record, current financial statements of the
borrower, guarantors, and principals or general partners of the borrower,
property inspection reports, rent rolls and operating statements for income
properties and loan "work-out" status, if applicable.
When a borrower requests a modification of loan terms, the loan is
considered to be in a possible work-out status. The Bank will consider a
workout of a loan when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and
the Bank determines that the loan, as modified, is likely to result in a
greater ultimate recovery to the Bank than taking title to the property. A
work-out may range from (i) a modification, allowing the payment of interest
only for a short period of time and then returning to payments of principal
and interest, to (ii) a complex agreement which may include, among other
things, the Bank writing off a portion of loan principal or forgiving accrued
and unpaid interest. A loan work-out, therefore, could be a modification or a
TDR. See "--Credit Loss Experience." For purposes of loan classification and
grading, a loan where work-out negotiations are in progress is classified in a
manner that reflects the asset's circumstances at the time of review.
The Bank also analyzes its multifamily loans, which represent the largest
portion of the Bank's portfolio, by geographic submarkets. In this process the
Bank utilizes a national real estate consulting firm and the Bank's appraisal
department to understand key real estate market trends in those submarkets.
20
<PAGE>
Asset Classification
Credit risk is graded based on the Bank's internal asset review policies and
procedures, and individual loans are categorized as Pass, Special Mention,
Substandard, Doubtful or Loss depending on the risk characteristics of each
loan. All such grading requires the application of subjective judgment by the
Bank. A brief description of these categories follows:
A Pass asset is considered of sufficient quality to preclude designation as
Special Mention or a substandard asset. Pass assets generally are protected by
the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor and by the value of
the underlying collateral.
An asset designated as Special Mention does not currently expose an
institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant an adverse
classification. However, it does possess credit deficiencies or potential
weaknesses deserving management's close attention. If uncorrected, such
weaknesses or deficiencies may expose an institution to an increased risk of
loss in the future. Special mention assets are also referred to as criticized.
An asset classified as Substandard is inadequately protected by the current
net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged.
Assets so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses. They are
characterized by the distinct possibility that the insured institution will
sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Assets classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those
classified as Substandard. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and
values, highly questionable or improbable. The Bank will generally classify
assets as Doubtful when inadequate data is available or when such uncertainty
exists as to preclude a Substandard classification.
Assets classified as Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little
value that their continuance as assets without establishment of a specific
reserve is not warranted. A Loss classification does not mean that an asset
has absolutely no recovery or salvage value; rather it means that it is not
practical or desirable to defer establishing a specific allowance for a
basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be effected in the
future. The Bank will generally classify as Loss the portion of assets
identified as exceeding the asset's fair market value and a specific reserve
is established for such excess.
21
<PAGE>
The data set forth in the tables below for classified assets at December 31,
1996, reflects the impact of the Bank's evaluation of its classified loans
during the fourth quarter of 1996. See "--Loan Grading System."
The following table presents net classified assets by property type at the
dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996 1995
------------ ------------- -------- --------- ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Performing classified
loans:
Single family......... $ 4,555 $ 10,054 $ 8,098 $ 6,638 $ 4,368
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........ 6,030 9,374 10,227 11,173 8,297
5 to 36 units....... 60,785 146,050 148,073 115,857 85,581
37 units and over... 10,375 42,861 43,564 48,656 39,301
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total multifamily
properties....... 77,190 198,285 201,864 175,686 133,179
Commercial and other.. 29,503(1) 40,628(1) 41,885(1) 39,955(1) 10,099
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total performing
classified loans... 111,248 248,967 251,847 222,279 147,646
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Nonperforming classified
loans:
Single family......... 8,019 7,478 6,306 5,897 7,226
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........ 5,959 4,897 4,453 4,950 6,671
5 to 36 units....... 18,071 19,200 24,989 20,699 14,312
37 units and over... 2,671 1,665 4,019 4,720 3,190
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total multifamily
properties....... 26,701 25,762 33,461 30,369 24,173
Commercial and other.. 1,405 3,240 3,525 3,845 20,511(2)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total nonperforming
classified loans... 36,125 36,480 43,292 40,111 51,910
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total classified
loans............ 147,373 285,447 295,139 262,390 199,556
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Real estate owned:
Single family......... 3,185 3,548 2,802 3,564 2,952
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........ 3,410 4,018 3,297 5,246 2,598
5 to 36 units....... 13,574 12,331 7,457 7,345 8,421
37 units and over... 1,844 1,844 1,265 1,439 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total multifamily
properties....... 18,828 18,193 12,019 14,030 11,019
Commercial and other.. 3,950 4,475 6,398 6,339 7,850
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net REO before REO
GVA................ 25,963 26,216 21,219 23,933 21,821
REO GVA............... (1,300) (1,000) (700) (400) (2,300)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total real estate
owned.............. 24,663 25,216 20,519 23,533 19,521
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Other classified assets. 2,060 2,503 3,100 2,979 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total classified
assets............. $174,096 $313,166 $318,758 $288,902 $219,077
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes a hotel property loan with a balance of $18.4 million at December
31, 1996.
(2) Includes two loans on one hotel property with a total balance of $15.9
million for 1995.
22
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes net classified assets at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NPAs:
Nonaccruing loans........ $ 36,125 $ 51,910 $ 71,614 $ 93,475 $112,041
ISFs(1).................. -- -- -- 28,362 47,324
REO(2)................... 24,663 19,521 14,115 113,784 75,040
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total NPAs............. 60,788 71,431 85,729 235,621 234,405
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Performing classified
loans:
Single family............ 4,555 4,368 544 5,749 6,808
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........... 6,030 8,297 951 7,616 3,648
5 to 36 units.......... 60,785 85,581 28,872 56,485 38,589
Over 37 units.......... 10,375 39,301 19,925 51,965 49,566
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total multifamily.... 77,190 133,179 49,748 116,066 91,803
Commercial and
industrial.............. 29,503(3) 10,099 5,515 3,905 9,831
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total performing
classified loans...... 111,248 147,646 55,807 125,720 108,442
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Other classified assets.... 2,060 -- -- 11,161 10,891
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total classified
assets................ $174,096 $219,077 $141,536 $372,502 $353,738
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
NPAs to total assets....... 1.83% 2.16% 2.31% 5.37% 4.99%
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Classified assets to total
assets.................... 5.23% 6.64% 3.82% 8.49% 7.53%
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) On January 1, 1994 the Bank implemented SFAS No. 114, which effectively
eliminated the in-substance foreclosure ("ISF") designation. Loans
previously considered ISFs are included in loans beginning in 1994.
(2) For presentation purposes, NPAs include REO net of REO GVA, if any.
(3) Includes a hotel property loan with a balance of $18.4 million at December
31, 1996.
23
<PAGE>
The following tables present net classified assets for the quarters
indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996
------------ ------------- -------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NPAs:
Nonaccruing loans............. $ 36,125 $ 36,480 $ 43,292 $ 40,111
REO, before REO GVA........... 25,963 26,216 21,219 23,933
REO GVA....................... (1,300) (1,000) (700) (400)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total NPAs.................. 60,788 61,696 63,811 63,644
Performing classified loans..... 111,248 248,967 251,847 222,279
Other classified assets....... 2,060 2,503 3,100 2,979
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total classified assets..... $174,096 $313,166 $318,758 $288,902
======== ======== ======== ========
NPAs to total assets............ 1.83% 1.86% 1.94% 1.94%
======== ======== ======== ========
Classified assets to total
assets......................... 5.23% 9.42% 9.67% 8.81%
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, SEPTEMBER 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
1995 1995 1995 1995
------------ ------------- -------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NPAs:
Nonaccruing loans............. $ 51,910 $ 55,114 $ 64,944 $ 70,519
REO, before REO GVA........... 21,821 37,550 27,808 21,350
REO GVA....................... (2,300) -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total NPAs.................. 71,431 92,664 92,752 91,869
Performing classified loans..... 147,646 88,337 74,140 73,979
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total classified assets..... $219,077 $181,001 $166,892 $165,848
======== ======== ======== ========
NPAs to total assets............ 2.16% 2.74% 2.68% 2.50%
======== ======== ======== ========
Classified assets to total
assets......................... 6.64% 5.35% 4.82% 4.50%
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
Credit losses are inherent in the business of originating and retaining
loans. The portfolio monitoring procedures discussed earlier (see "--Credit
Administration--Loan Portfolio Risk Elements" and "--Loan Monitoring") assist
the Bank in early identification of potential problem loans and losses. The
Bank's loan service and special assets departments are responsible for working
with borrowers to resolve problem loans and minimize credit losses. The Bank's
REO department is responsible for selling properties acquired through
foreclosure.
The Company establishes allowances for estimated losses on loans and REO
which represent the Company's estimate of identified and unidentified losses
in the Company's portfolios. These estimates, while based upon historical loss
experience and other relevant data, are ultimately subjective and inherently
uncertain. The Company has established valuation allowances for estimated
losses on specific loans and REO ("specific valuation allowances" or "SVA")
and for the inherent risk in the loan and REO portfolios which has yet to be
specifically identified ("general valuation allowances" or "GVA"). Specific
valuation allowances are allocated from the GVA when, in the Company's
judgment, a loan is impaired or REO has declined in value and the loss is
probable and estimable. When these estimated losses are determined to be
permanent, such as when a loan is foreclosed and the related property is
transferred to REO, specific valuation allowances are charged off.
On January 1, 1994, the Bank adopted SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan", as amended by SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by
Creditors for Impairment of a Loan--Income
24
<PAGE>
Recognition and Disclosures." This statement prescribes the recognition
criteria for loan impairment and the measurement methods for certain impaired
loans and loans whose terms are modified in TDRs. SFAS No. 114 states that a
loan is impaired when it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect
all principal and interest amounts due according to the contracted terms of
the loan agreement. A creditor is required to measure impairment by
discounting expected future cash flows at the loan's effective interest rate,
or by reference to an observable market price, or by determining the fair
value of the collateral for a collateral dependent asset. Regardless of the
measurement method, a creditor shall measure impairment based on the fair
value of the collateral when the creditor determines that foreclosure is
probable. The statement also clarifies the existing accounting for ISFs by
stating that a collateral dependent real estate loan would be reported as REO
only if the lender had taken possession of the collateral.
In measuring the risk of the loan portfolio, the Bank reviews and classifies
loans through its internal asset review process principally utilizing the LGS.
This process involves the evaluation of loans in order to determine if a SVA
should be placed against those assets which exhibit characteristics of
inherent risk of loss although actual loss may not be certain at the time such
an SVA is established.
The Company establishes the level of GVA utilizing several models and
methodologies which are based upon a number of factors, including historical
loss experience, the level of nonperforming and internally classified loans,
the composition of the loan portfolio, estimated remaining lives of the
various types of loans within the portfolio, prevailing and forecasted
economic conditions and management's judgment. Additions to GVA, in the form
of provisions, are reflected in current operations.
The amount of the Bank's allowance for loan losses represents management's
estimate of the amount of loan losses likely to be incurred by the Bank, based
upon various assumptions as to economic and other conditions. As such, the
allowance for loan losses does not represent the amount of such losses that
could be incurred under adverse conditions that management does not consider
to be the most likely to arise. In addition, management's classification of
assets and evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is an
ongoing process. Consequently, there can be no assurance that material
additions to the Bank's allowance for loan losses will not be required in the
future, thereby adversely affecting earnings and the Bank's ability to
maintain or build capital. While management believes that the current
allowance is adequate to absorb the known and inherent risks in the loan
portfolio, no assurances can be given that the allowance is adequate or that
economic conditions which may adversely affect the Bank's market area or other
circumstances will not result in future loan losses, which may not be covered
completely by the current allowance or may require an increased provision
which could have a significant adverse effect on the Bank's financial
condition, results of operations and levels of regulatory capital.
The following table sets forth the allowance for estimated loan losses
broken out by GVA and SVA for loan or REO at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER
31,
DECEMBER 31, 1996 1995
------------------------- -------------------------
LOANS REO TOTAL LOANS REO TOTAL
------- ------ ------- ------- ------ -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GVA......................... $25,308 $1,300 $26,608 $48,921 $2,300 $51,221
SVA......................... 32,200 781 32,981 40,514 1,192 41,706
------- ------ ------- ------- ------ -------
$57,508(1) $2,081 $59,589 $89,435(1) $3,492 $92,927
======= ====== ======= ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the allowance for estimated loan losses
includes $16.7 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of remaining loan
GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See Item 7. "MD&A--
Asset Quality--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
25
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated
loan and REO losses for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of
period.................... $ 92,927 $ 69,520 $101,547 $ 80,727 $ 52,374
Provision for estimated
loan and REO losses..... 18,829 73,090(1) 74,327 95,300 69,000
Charge-offs.............. (55,471) (52,636) (72,505) (79,444) (41,176)
GVA charged off on bulk
sale assets............. -- -- (38,391) -- --
Recoveries and other..... 3,304 2,953 4,542 4,964 529
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance at end of period... $ 59,589 $ 92,927 $ 69,520 $101,547 $ 80,727
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Included in the provision for estimated loan losses for 1995 is the $45
million loan portfolio charge associated with the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan.
The following table presents loan and REO charge-offs by property type for
the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family..................................... $ 4.3 $ 2.7 $ 4.1 $ 3.5 $ 1.7
Multifamily loans:
2 to 4 units.................................... 6.2 5.2 8.6 5.0 2.2
5 to 36 units................................... 33.1 33.9 39.1 44.0 12.4
37 units and over............................... 6.0 8.2 16.3 21.8 13.2
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total multifamily............................. 45.3 47.3 64.0 70.8 27.8
Commercial and industrial......................... 5.8 2.6 4.4 5.1 11.7
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total charge-offs............................. $55.4 $52.6 $72.5 $79.4 $41.2
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
The following table presents loan and REO recoveries by property type and
net charge-offs for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family............................... $ 0.6 $ 0.1 $ 0.1 $ 0.4 $ --
Multifamily loans:
2 to 4 units.............................. 0.3 0.1 0.2 -- --
5 to 36 units............................. 1.2 1.8 3.2 3.3 0.2
37 units and over......................... 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.9 --
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total multifamily....................... 2.0 2.7 4.1 4.2 0.2
Commercial and industrial................... 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Total recoveries........................ $ 3.3 $ 3.0 $ 4.5 $ 5.0 $ 0.5
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Total charge-offs, net of recoveries........ $52.1 $49.6 $68.0 $74.4 $40.7
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period
to average loans outstanding............... 1.8% 1.6% 1.9% 1.9% 0.9%
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
26
<PAGE>
The following tables present loan and REO charge-offs by property type and
year of loan origination for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1986
AND
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 TOTAL 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 PRIOR
- ---------------------------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- -----
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family............... $ 4.3 $-- $0.7 $0.4 $0.5 $0.8 $ 1.3 $0.2 $0.1 $-- $0.3
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.............. 6.2 -- -- -- -- 0.4 3.1 1.6 1.1 -- --
5 to 36 units............. 33.1 -- -- 0.6 0.9 8.4 9.7 4.4 5.2 2.9 1.0
37 units and over......... 6.0 -- -- -- 0.9 -- 1.4 -- 1.3 -- 2.4
----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total multifamily....... 45.3 -- -- 0.6 1.8 8.8 14.2 6.0 7.6 2.9 3.4
Commercial and industrial... 5.8 -- 0.9 -- -- -- 0.2 1.9 0.3 0.4 2.1
----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total charge-offs........... $55.4 $-- $1.6 $1.0 $2.3 $9.6 $15.7 $8.1 $8.0 $3.3 $5.8
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ===== ==== ==== ==== ====
Percent of total charge-
offs....................... 100.0% -- % 2.9% 1.8% 4.2% 17.3% 28.3% 14.6% 14.4% 6.0% 10.5%
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ===== ==== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
--------------------------------------------------------------
1986
AND
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 TOTAL 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 PRIOR
- ---------------------------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- -----
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family............... $ 2.7 $-- $0.2 $0.1 $0.2 $ 0.5 $ 1.3 $0.2 $0.2 $--
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.............. 5.2 -- -- 0.1 -- 3.1 1.1 0.9 -- --
5 to 36 units............. 33.9 -- -- 0.6 6.4 11.3 4.0 5.3 5.2 1.1
37 units and over......... 8.2 -- -- -- -- 0.9 2.5 1.1 2.6 1.1
----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
Total multifamily....... 47.3 -- -- 0.7 6.4 15.3 7.6 7.3 7.8 2.2
Commercial and industrial... 2.6 -- -- -- -- -- 1.1 -- -- 1.5
----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
Total charge-offs........... $52.6 $-- $0.2 $0.8 $6.6 $15.8 $10.0 $7.5 $8.0 $3.7
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ===== ===== ==== ==== ====
Percent of total charge-
offs....................... 100.0% -- % 0.4% 1.5% 12.5% 30.1% 19.0% 14.3% 15.2% 7.0%
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ===== ===== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
---------------------------------------------------------
1986
AND
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 TOTAL 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 PRIOR
- ---------------------------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- -----
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family............... $ 4.1 $-- $0.2 $0.2 $ 2.3 $ 0.8 $ 0.2 $0.2 $0.2
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.............. 8.6 -- -- 0.2 5.9 2.1 0.3 -- 0.1
5 to 36 units............. 39.1 0.4 0.1 3.9 20.4 5.9 6.0 1.3 1.1
37 units and over......... 16.3 -- -- 0.8 2.6 5.5 4.4 0.4 2.6
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----
Total multifamily....... 64.0 0.4 0.1 4.9 28.9 13.5 10.7 1.7 3.8
Commercial and industrial... 4.4 -- -- -- -- -- 2.9 -- 1.5
----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----
Total charge-offs........... $72.5 $0.4 $0.3 $5.1 $31.2 $14.3 $13.8 $1.9 $5.5
===== ==== ==== ==== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====
Percent of total charge-
offs....................... 100.0% 0.6% 0.4% 7.1% 42.9% 19.8% 19.0% 2.6% 7.6%
===== ==== ==== ==== ===== ===== ===== ==== ====
</TABLE>
27
<PAGE>
The following tables present the gross mortgage loan portfolio as of the
dates indicated by property type and year of origination (amounts are gross of
reserves and net of writedowns):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1987
AND
TOTAL 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 PRIOR
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Property Type
Single family.......... $ 517.3 $ 7.3 $ 0.3 $150.3 $ 57.2 $ 29.2 $ 11.5 $ 51.8 $ 39.1 $ 67.2 $103.4
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units......... 319.3 0.3 -- 15.8 23.3 12.7 19.0 70.9 57.0 68.8 51.5
5 to 36 units........ 1,408.3 1.4 4.7 58.3 79.4 101.1 149.0 345.5 160.9 189.3 318.7
37 units and over.... 307.7 3.6 0.8 53.2 12.6 12.7 4.6 30.6 57.3 35.6 96.7
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total multifamily.. 2,035.3 5.3 5.5 127.3 115.3 126.5 172.6 447.0 275.2 293.7 466.9
Commercial and
industrial............. 205.2 0.5 6.5 5.4 1.3 0.6 1.6 10.3 28.1 43.3 107.6
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross mortgage loans.... $2,757.8 $13.1 $ 12.3 $283.0 $173.8 $156.3 $185.7 $509.1 $342.4 $404.2 $677.9
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Loans by year of
origination to total... 100.0% 0.5% 0.4% 10.3% 6.3% 5.7% 6.7% 18.5% 12.4% 14.6% 24.6%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Net delinquencies by
year of origination.... 2.3% -- % -- % 1.1% 2.4% 0.6% 4.1% 3.6% 2.3% 1.8% 1.9%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Charge-offs by year of
origination............ 2.0% -- % -- % 0.6% 0.6% 1.5% 5.2% 3.1% 2.4% 2.0% 1.3%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1995
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR OF ORIGINATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1986
AND
TOTAL 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 PRIOR
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family........... $ 594.0 $ 0.3 $177.3 $ 66.3 $ 33.8 $ 14.4 $ 59.3 $ 44.6 $ 75.9 $ 48.6 $ 73.5
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units........... 345.9 -- 16.5 24.1 13.2 20.7 78.7 62.7 74.4 25.7 29.9
5 to 36 units.......... 1,521.1 4.8 64.3 85.6 106.7 167.7 367.6 173.1 208.9 128.6 213.8
37 units and over...... 329.9 3.2 59.4 12.7 15.0 4.7 32.5 57.7 38.7 54.9 51.1
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total multifamily.... 2,196.9 8.0 140.2 122.4 134.9 193.1 478.8 293.5 322.0 209.2 294.8
Commercial and
industrial............. 237.4 6.5 5.5 1.3 0.6 1.7 11.7 37.5 51.3 21.0 100.3
-------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross mortgage loans. $3,028.3 $14.8 $323.0 $190.0 $169.3 $209.2 $549.8 $375.6 $449.2 $278.8 $468.6
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Loans by year of
origination to total... 100.0% 0.5% 10.7% 6.3% 5.6% 6.9% 18.1% 12.4% 14.8% 9.2% 15.5%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Net delinquencies by
year of origination.... 2.4% -- % 0.5% 1.0% 0.8% 4.6% 2.3% 2.2% 1.8% 1.4% 5.3%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Charge-offs by year of
origination............ 1.7% -- % -- % 0.1% 0.5% 3.2% 2.9% 2.6% 1.7% 2.9% 0.8%
======== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
From 1987 through 1991, which were Fidelity's peak lending volume years,
loan originations totaled $1.3 billion, $1.5 billion, $0.9 billion,
$1.2 billion and $0.5 billion, respectively. Of these years' total
originations, approximately 47% were multifamily (5 units or more) loans. As a
result of the decline in the Southern California economy and real estate
market since 1991, the Bank experienced significant loan and real estate
losses, high levels of NPAs and increased levels of REO with respect to its
loans on multifamily properties of 5 units or more. During 1994, 1995 and
1996, the Bank reserved and/or charged off amounts corresponding to these peak
origination years totaling $13.2 million for loans originated in 1987,
$29.3 million for 1988, $32.4 million for 1989, $62.7 million for 1990 and
$21.3 million for 1991, for a total of $158.9 million. Losses on multifamily
loans (5 units or more) comprised $123.8 million, or 77.9%, of this total.
Continued downward pressure on the economy and real estate market could lead
to additional losses in this portfolio and adversely affect the Bank's
performance and loan and real estate portfolios.
28
<PAGE>
The high level of provisions for loss and charge-offs during 1994, 1995 and
1996 was primarily due to depressed economic conditions for real estate in
Southern California. Though the Southern California economy continues to be
characterized by higher unemployment than the national and state averages and
real estate values that, in some cases, continue to decline, there are
indicators that imply the economy is beginning to recover. There can be no
assurances that the Southern California economy will recover in the near term
as many factors key to recovery may be impacted adversely by the Federal
Reserve Board's interest rate policy as well as other factors. Consequently,
rents and real estate values may not stabilize, which may affect future
delinquency and foreclosure levels and may adversely impact the Company's
asset quality, earnings performance and capital levels.
FORECLOSURE POLICIES
The Bank typically initiates foreclosure proceedings between 30 and 90 days
after a borrower defaults on a loan. The proceedings take at least four months
before the collateral for the loan can become property of the Bank, and this
period can be extended under certain circumstances, such as, if the borrower
files bankruptcy or if the Bank enters into negotiations with the borrower to
restructure the loan. In California, foreclosure proceedings almost always
take the form of a nonjudicial foreclosure, upon the completion of which the
lender is left without recourse against the borrower for any deficiency or
shortfall from the difference between the value of the collateral and the
amount of the loan, and in most cases the Bank obtains title to the property.
In some cases, while the foreclosure proceedings are underway, the borrower
requests forbearance from foreclosure in order to have more time to cure the
default or restructure the loan. The Bank agrees to restructure when it
determines that the loan, as modified, is likely to result in a greater
ultimate recovery than taking title to the property. Among the factors the
Bank considers in restructuring a loan is the extent to which the borrower
pays down the loan, furnishes additional collateral or makes a further
investment in the property by way of repairs or refurbishment, and
demonstrates an awareness and ability to manage the property according to a
reasonable operating plan.
REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED IN SETTLEMENT OF LOANS
Real estate is acquired in settlement of loans when property collateralizing
a loan is foreclosed upon or otherwise acquired in satisfaction of the loan
and the Bank takes title to the property. Prior to January 1, 1994, certain
loans were also included in REO when they exhibited characteristics more
closely associated with the risk of real estate ownership than with loans.
These loans were designated as ISF if they met the following criteria: (a) the
borrower currently has little or no equity at fair market value in the
underlying collateral, (b) the only source of repayment is the property
securing the loan and (c) the borrower has abandoned the property or will not
be able to rebuild equity in the foreseeable future. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS No. 114, beginning January 1, 1994, loans that meet the
criteria for ISF designation are no longer reported as REO, although they
continue to be valued based on the fair value of the collateral and generally
continue to be included in NPAs.
29
<PAGE>
The following table presents net REO, including ISFs (prior to 1994), by
property type at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------- ------- ------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family..................... $ 3,185 $ 2,952 $ 930 $ 6,942 $ 7,014
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units.................... 3,410 2,598 198 10,345 4,129
5 to 36 units................... 13,574 8,421 4,884 41,177 32,535
37 units and over............... 1,844 -- 1,041 47,565 40,924
------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total multifamily............. 18,828 11,019 6,123 99,087 77,588
Commercial and industrial....... 3,950 7,850 7,062 44,559 51,381
REO GVA........................... (1,300) (2,300) -- (8,442) (13,619)
------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Total net REO(1)(2)............. $24,663 $19,521 $14,115 $142,146 $122,364
======= ======= ======= ======== ========
Total ISFs included above......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 28,362 $ 47,324
======= ======= ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Foreclosed real estate is shown net of first trust deed loans to others,
where applicable.
(2) The Bulk Sales in the third and fourth quarters of 1994 contributed to the
significant decrease in REO.
The following table presents real estate acquired in settlement of loans by
location and property type at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MULTIFAMILY
-----------------------
SINGLE 2 TO 4 5 TO 36 37 UNITS COMMERCIAL
FAMILY UNITS UNITS AND OVER & INDUSTRIAL TOTAL
------ ------ ------- -------- ------------ -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California:
Southern California
Counties:
Los Angeles........... $1,917 $1,089 $ 9,881 $ -- $1,188 $14,075
Orange................ 383 1,386 2,247 -- 438 4,454
Riverside............. 509 431 242 -- 2,324 3,506
San Bernardino........ 73 504 1,204 -- -- 1,781
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
2,882 3,410 13,574 -- 3,950 23,816
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Northern California
Counties:
Sacramento............ -- -- -- 1,844 -- 1,844
Alameda............... 303 -- -- -- -- 303
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
303 -- -- 1,844 -- 2,147
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
Total REO............... $3,185 $3,410 $13,574 $1,844 $3,950 25,963
====== ====== ======= ====== ======
REO GVA............................................................... (1,300)
-------
Total REO, Net of GVA............................................... $24,663
=======
</TABLE>
In the current market, the Bank rarely sells REO for a price equal to or
greater than the gross loan balance, and the losses suffered are impacted by
the market factors discussed elsewhere in this document. REO is recorded at
acquisition at the lower of the recorded investment in the subject loan or the
fair market value of the assets received. The fair market value of the assets
received is based upon a current appraisal adjusted for estimated carrying,
rehabilitation and selling costs. Most income-producing properties acquired by
the Bank through foreclosure are managed by third party contract managers,
under the supervision of Bank personnel.
During 1996, the Bank sold 203 REO properties with a net book balance of
$41.7 million for net sales proceeds of $40.3 million. The Bank made six loans
in connection with the sales of these REO properties for a
30
<PAGE>
total of $4.8 million during the year. Of these, one loan in the amount of
$1.1 million contained terms favorable to the borrower that were not available
to borrowers for the purchase of non-REO property.
During 1995, the Bank sold 210 REO properties with a net book balance of
$47.9 million for net sales proceeds of $43.0 million. The Bank made 18 loans
in connection with the sales of these REO properties for a total of $9.0
million during the year. Of these, one loan in the amount of $1.0 million
contained terms favorable to the borrower that were not available to borrowers
for the purchase of non-REO property.
During 1996, the Bank foreclosed on 226 properties with an aggregate gross
loan balance of $77.6 million. The average gross book value per asset
foreclosed in 1996 was $0.3 million. During 1995 and 1994, the Bank foreclosed
on 270 and 232 assets with gross loan balances of $92.7 million and
$102.3 million, respectively. The average gross book balance per asset
foreclosed in 1995 was $0.3 million compared to $0.4 million in 1994.
BULK SALES
During 1994, the Bank completed Bulk Sales of $563.3 million of NPAs and
other problem assets. The table below presents the composition of the gross
book balance of assets sold.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERFORMING NONACCRUAL
LOANS LOANS TDRS REO TOTAL
---------- ---------- ------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Single family residences....... $ 2,766 $ 14,413 $ -- $ 10,856 $ 28,035
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units................. 2,947 15,030 1,209 14,081 33,267
5 units and over............. 138,869 75,725 24,484 146,764 385,842
Commercial and other real
estate........................ 26,612 39,377 -- 50,142 116,131
-------- -------- ------- -------- --------
$171,194 $144,545 $25,693 $221,843 $563,275
======== ======== ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
At the date of sale, specific reserves and writedowns of $116.4 million were
associated with these assets. Net proceeds from the sales were $354.9 million.
TREASURY ACTIVITIES
Investments
At December 31, 1996, the Bank maintained an available-for-sale portfolio to
provide a source of liquid earning assets to meet funding and other
requirements.
As a consequence of concerns regarding the Bank's ability to maintain
minimum regulatory capital levels to remain adequately capitalized, the Bank
reclassified all held-to-maturity investment securities and MBS to its
available-for-sale portfolio in the second quarter of 1995. Subsequent to
their reclassification, certain available-for-sale securities were sold within
the quarter. In the third quarter of 1996, the Company identified $15.6
million of MBS and $7.4 million of investment securities for which it had the
ability and intent to hold to maturity, and transferred them from its
available for sale portfolio to its held to maturity portfolio, at fair value.
Fidelity is required by federal regulations to maintain a minimum level of
liquid assets which may be invested in certain government and other specified
securities. See "--Regulation and Supervision--Fidelity--Activities Regulation
Not Related to Capital Compliance." Investment decisions are made within
guidelines approved by Fidelity's Board of Directors. Investment portfolios
are managed in an effort to maximize yields consistent with maintaining safety
of principal and compliance with applicable regulations.
31
<PAGE>
The securities portfolio consisted of the following at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
----------------- ----------------- -----------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal funds sold....... $ 29,000 7.00% $ -- -- % $ -- -- %
-------- -------- --------
Investment securities:
Available for sale:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations.. 156,251 6.20 87,184 4.66 24,158 6.91
Other investments.... -- -- 7,471 5.54 -- --
-------- -------- --------
156,251 6.20 94,655 4.70 24,158 6.91
-------- -------- --------
Held to maturity:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations.. -- -- -- -- 116,313 5.19
Other investments.... 5,178 5.77 -- -- 8,920 5.26
-------- -------- --------
5,178 5.77 -- -- 125,233 5.20
-------- -------- --------
Total investment
securities.......... 161,429 6.19 94,655 4.70 149,391 5.46
-------- -------- --------
Mortgage-backed
securities:
Available for sale:
FHLMC................ 62,362 7.87 3,038 5.51 10,270 6.47
FNMA................. 55,548 7.24 91 2.72 4,051 3.92
Participation
certificates........ 25,813 6.72 28,604 7.01 31,707 5.80
GNMA................. 35,680 6.54 -- -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
179,403 7.51 31,733 6.85 46,028 5.62
-------- -------- --------
Held to maturity:
Non-agency........... 30,024 7.52 -- -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
Trading:
GNMA................. 14,121 6.52 -- -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total mortgage-backed
securities.......... 223,548 7.51 31,733 6.85 46,028 5.62
-------- -------- --------
FHLB stock............... 52,330 6.00 49,425 5.00 47,017 5.00
-------- -------- --------
$466,307 6.85 $175,813 5.18 $242,436 5.40
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the maturity and weighted average yield of
investment securities at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MATURES IN
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 THROUGH 2002 THROUGH 2007 AND
TOTAL 1997 2001 2006 THEREAFTER
----------------- ---------------- ----------------- --------------- -----------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD AMOUNT YIELD
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Federal Funds Sold...... $ 29,000 7.00% $29,000 7.00% $ -- -- % $ -- -- % $ -- -- %
Investment securities:
U.S. Government and
agency obligations:
Available for sale... 156,251 6.20 -- -- 113,631 5.65 -- -- 42,620 7.70
Held to maturity..... 5,178 5.77 2,178 5.46 3,000 6.00 -- -- -- --
-------- ------- -------- ------ --------
Total investment
securities............. 161,429 6.19 2,178 5.46 116,631 5.66 -- -- 42,620 7.70
-------- ------- -------- ------ --------
Mortgage-backed
securities:
Available for sale..... 179,403 7.51 -- -- -- -- 6,854 7.31 172,549 7.24
Held to maturity....... 30,024 7.52 -- -- -- -- -- -- 30,024 7.52
Trading................ 14,121 6.52 -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,121 6.52
-------- ------- -------- ------ --------
Total Mortgage Backed
Securities............. 223,548 7.51 -- -- -- -- 6,854 7.31 216,694 7.23
-------- ------- -------- ------ --------
FHLB Stock.............. 52,330 6.00 52,330 6.00 -- -- -- -- -- --
-------- ------- -------- ------ --------
$466,307 6.85 $83,508 6.33 $116,631 5.66 $6,854 7.31 $259,314 7.31
======== ======= ======== ====== ========
</TABLE>
SOURCES OF FUNDS
The Bank derives funds from deposits, FHLB advances, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and other short-term and long-term borrowings. In
addition, funds are generated from loan payments and payoffs as well as from
the sale of loans and investments.
33
<PAGE>
Deposits
The largest source of funds for the Company is deposits. Customer deposits
are insured by the FDIC to the maximum amount permitted by law up to $100,000
per account. The Company has several types of deposit accounts designed to
attract both short-term and long-term deposits. The following table sets forth
the weighted average interest rates paid and the amounts of deposits held at
the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
RATES AT DECEMBER 31, DEPOSITS AT DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------- --------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1996 1995 1994
------- ------- ------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Checking--no minimum
term:
NOW................... 1.5% 1.3% 1.1% $ 214,985 $ 232,554 $ 251,224
Money market checking. 2.8 2.8 2.8 2,287 3,363 7,076
Noninterest bearing... -- -- -- 70,439 73,148 68,111
Savings--no minimum
term:
Passbook.............. 2.0 2.0 2.0 53,665 62,934 70,564
Money market savings.. 4.1 3.1 3.1 65,605 93,901 135,595
Certificate accounts:
Original term:
Less than 3 months.. 3.5 3.3 3.2 3,870 7,053 14,754
3 months to 5
months............. 4.7 4.3 3.4 22,108 29,258 60,880
6 months to 11
months(1).......... 5.1 4.9 3.6 223,800 271,951 384,013
12 months to 23
months(1).......... 5.1 5.6 4.9 1,565,662 1,464,757 1,295,473
24 months to 59
months............. 6.0 5.5 4.7 117,082 142,454 174,019
60 months and over.. 6.4 6.7 6.8 156,430 219,496 235,563
---------- ---------- ----------
Total certificate
accounts............... 5.3 5.6 4.8 2,088,952 2,134,969 2,164,702
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deposits.... 4.7% 4.9% 4.2% $2,495,933 $2,600,869 $2,697,272
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Included in the above balances at December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, are
$0.1 million, $771.5 million, and $1,051.8 million, respectively, of
certain accounts with product features including withdrawal and deposit
options without penalty.
The following tables provide additional deposit information by remaining
maturity at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OVER OVER OVER OVER
3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 24 MONTHS
WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN BUT WITHIN OVER
3 MONTHS 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 24 MONTHS 36 MONTHS 36 MONTHS TOTAL
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Type of account,
weighted-average
interest rate:
Passbook, 2.00%........ $ 53,665 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 53,665
Checking and money
market
checking, 1.10%....... 287,711 -- -- -- -- -- 287,711
Money market passbook,
4.14%................. 65,605 -- -- -- -- -- 65,605
Certificate accounts:
Under 3.00%.......... 3,255 242 870 160 11 102 4,640
3.01-4.00%........... 12,573 7,001 27 -- -- -- 19,601
4.01-5.00%........... 568,734 228,902 358,051 6,726 3,114 820 1,166,347
5.01-6.00%........... 242,601 107,963 237,513 61,545 8,396 11,585 669,603
6.01-7.00%........... 62,999 59,869 58,470 9,918 3,256 5,235 199,747
7.01-8.00%........... 7,140 1,201 170 327 8,194 289 17,321
Over 8.01%........... -- 8,827 2,483 208 74 101 11,693
---------- -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ----------
Total Certificates. 897,302 414,005 657,584 78,884 23,045 18,132 2,088,952
---------- -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ----------
Total Deposits..... $1,304,283 $414,005 $657,584 $78,884 $23,045 $18,132 $2,495,933
========== ======== ======== ======= ======= ======= ==========
</TABLE>
34
<PAGE>
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more totaled $543.3 million and
represented 21.8% of all deposits at December 31, 1996 and totaled $528.3
million and represented 20.3% of all deposits at December 31, 1995. The
Company intends to continue to use such certificates of deposits as a source
of funds to manage its liquidity.
The following table summarizes certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more
by remaining maturity and weighted average rate at December 31, 1996.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENT WEIGHTED
OF TOTAL AVERAGE
REMAINING TERM TO MATURITY (IN MONTHS) AMOUNT DEPOSITS RATE
-------------------------------------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Within three...................................... $254,080 10.2% 5.22%
Over three but within six......................... 103,123 4.1 5.48
Over six but within twelve........................ 156,212 6.3 5.44
Over twelve....................................... 29,921 1.2 6.38
--------
$543,336 21.8% 5.40%
========
</TABLE>
The distribution of certificate accounts by date of maturity is an important
indicator of the relative stability of a major source of funds. Longer term
certificate accounts generally provide greater stability as a source of funds,
but currently entail greater interest costs than passbook accounts. The
following tables summarize certificate accounts by maturity, as a percentage
of total deposits and weighted average rate at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996
----------------------------
PERCENT WEIGHTED
OF TOTAL AVERAGE
MATURES IN QUARTER ENDED: AMOUNT DEPOSITS RATE
------------------------- ---------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
March 31, 1997.................................. $ 897,302 35.9% 5.14%
June 30, 1997................................... 414,005 16.6 5.35
September 30, 1997.............................. 340,099 13.6 5.29
December 31, 1997............................... 317,485 12.7 5.30
March 31, 1998.................................. 33,949 1.4 5.55
June 30, 1998................................... 18,953 0.7 5.58
September 30, 1998.............................. 16,279 0.7 5.59
December 31, 1998............................... 9,703 0.4 5.56
March 31, 1999.................................. 12,421 0.5 7.02
June 30, 1999................................... 4,446 0.2 5.56
September 30, 1999.............................. 3,892 0.2 5.93
December 31, 1999............................... 2,286 0.1 6.02
After December 31, 1999......................... 18,132 0.7 5.80
---------- ----
$2,088,952 83.7% 5.27
========== ====
</TABLE>
The Bank may, from time to time, utilize brokered deposits as a short-term
means of funding. These deposits are obtained or placed by or through a
deposit broker and are subject to certain regulatory limitations. Should the
Bank become undercapitalized, it would be prohibited from accepting, renewing
or rolling over deposits obtained through a deposit broker. Although the Bank
is currently eligible to accept brokered deposits, at December 31, 1996 and
1995, no brokered deposits were outstanding compared to $0.1 million at
December 31, 1994. See "--Regulation and Supervision--Fidelity--Capital
Requirements and Capital Categories--Mandatory Restrictions on
Undercapitalized Institutions."
35
<PAGE>
Borrowings
The Company utilizes FHLB advances as a source of funds for operations. The
FHLB System functions as a source of credit to financial institutions which
are members of a Federal Home Loan Bank. See "--Regulation and Supervision--
Federal Home Loan Bank System." Fidelity may apply for advances from the FHLB
secured by the capital stock of the FHLB owned by Fidelity and certain of
Fidelity's mortgages and other assets (principally obligations issued or
guaranteed by the United States Government or agencies thereof). Advances can
be requested for any business purpose in which Fidelity is authorized to
engage, except that advances with a term greater than five years can be
granted only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing
finance. In granting advances, the FHLB considers a member's creditworthiness
and other relevant factors. FHLB advances to Fidelity totaled $449.9 million
and $292.7 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Included in
the FHLB advances outstanding at December 31, 1996 were advances of $117.2
million backed by specifically pledged securities. Fidelity's available FHLB
line of credit is based primarily on a portion of Fidelity's residential loan
portfolio pledged for such purpose, up to a maximum of 30% of total assets.
During the fourth quarter of 1996, the Bank decreased its commercial paper
line of credit which is guaranteed by the FHLB subject to the Bank's overall
borrowing limits, to $150 million. At December 31, 1996, Fidelity's remaining
available line of credit was $368.2 million, after deducting outstanding
advances and the $150 million backup letter of credit for commercial paper, as
described below.
The Bank issues commercial paper, backed by a $150 million letter of credit
from the FHLB of San Francisco, to ensure a high quality investment grade
rating. The letter of credit commitment varies with the level of commercial
paper outstanding, and the available commercial paper line of credit increases
or decreases accordingly. Commercial paper outstanding totaled $40 million and
$50 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The commercial paper
outstanding at December 31, 1996 had a maturity of 180 days or less and had an
effective interest rate of 5.36%.
The Company has utilized the capital markets to obtain funds for its lending
operations. The only such borrowing outstanding during 1996 and 1995 was an
8.50% mortgage-backed medium-term note, Series A, due April 15, 1997 (the
"MTN"). At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the MTN had a balance of $100 million.
The balance is secured by mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury notes with a
combined principal balance of $226.2 million and $246.5 million at December
31, 1996, and 1995, respectively. The Company intends to pay-off the MTN at
maturity utilizing one or more available sources of funds.
From time to time, Fidelity enters into reverse repurchase agreements by
which it sells securities with an agreement to repurchase the same securities
at a specific future date (overnight to one year). The Company deals only with
dealers who are recognized as primary dealers in U.S. Treasury securities by
the Federal Reserve Board or perceived by management to be financially strong.
There were no reverse repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 1996,
or 1995.
36
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth certain information as to the Company's FHLB
advances and other borrowings at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
FHLB advances:
Fixed rate advances......................... $237,151 $ 80,000 $ 80,000
Floating rate advances...................... 212,700 212,700 252,700
-------- -------- --------
449,851 292,700 332,700
-------- -------- --------
Other borrowings:
Mortgage-backed notes....................... 100,000 100,000 100,000
Commercial paper............................ 40,000 50,000 400,000
-------- -------- --------
140,000 150,000 500,000
-------- -------- --------
Total borrowings............................ $589,851 $442,700 $832,700
======== ======== ========
Weighted average interest rate on all
borrowings................................... 6.02% 6.05% 5.89%
======== ======== ========
Percent of total borrowings to total
liabilities and
stockholders' equity......................... 17.71% 13.42% 22.45%
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
The Interest Rate Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors and
the Asset/Liability Committee of the Bank management convene periodically to
manage the interest rate risk exposure of the Bank. For a discussion of the
Bank's management of interest rate risk, see Item 7. "MD&A--Asset/Liability
Management."
COMPETITION
The Company believes that the traditional role of thrift institutions as the
nation's primary housing lenders has diminished, and that thrift institutions
are subject to increasing competition from commercial banks, mortgage bankers
and others for both depositor funds and lending opportunities. In addition,
with assets of approximately $3.3 billion at December 31, 1996, the Company
faces competition from a number of substantially larger institutions. The
ability of thrift institutions, such as Fidelity, to compete by diversifying
into lending activities other than real estate lending and by offering
investments other than deposit-like investments is subject to certain
regulatory and legal restrictions. The ability of thrift institutions to
compete is also limited by their lack of experience in such other activities.
However, the Company believes these nontraditional activities and the related
fee income is vital for future success. See "--Business Strategy."
The Company faces significant competition in attracting savings deposits and
in originating loans as many of the nation's largest depository and other
financial institutions are headquartered or have a significant number of
branches in the areas where Fidelity conducts its business. Competition for
customers' funds comes principally from other savings and thrift institutions,
commercial banks, mutual funds, insurance companies, credit unions, corporate
and government debt securities, pension funds and investment banks and
investment brokerage firms. The principal basis of competition for investable
funds is the interest rate paid or effective return, the perceived credit risk
and the quality, types, and costs of services offered. In addition to offering
competitive rates and terms, the Company attracts customers through
advertising, readily accessible office locations, the diversity of its
products, and the quality of its customer service. Management believes that in
the past the Company's financial condition has, in some cases, also hindered
its ability to attract and retain employees.
Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of
1994 (the "Riegle-Neal Act"), commercial banks will be able to open branch
offices outside of their home state after June 1, 1997, although the extent of
their ability to branch into a new state will depend on the law of the state.
California adopted an early
37
<PAGE>
"opt-in" statute that was effective on October 2, 1995. The new legislation
permits out-of-state banks to acquire California banks that satisfy a five-
year minimum age requirement (subject to exceptions for supervisory
transactions) by means of merger or purchases of assets, although entry
through acquisition of individual branches of California institutions and "de
novo" branching into California are not permitted. The Riegle-Neal Act and the
California branching statute will likely increase competition from out-of-
state banks in the markets in which Fidelity operates.
Effective January 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997, the FDIC lowered risk based
deposit insurance premiums for SAIF insured depository institutions to a range
of 0 to 27 basis points. The new rates are identical to those effective for
BIF member institutions and eliminate the previously existing premium
differential (23 basis points for institutions in the lowest risk category),
which was competitively disadvantageous to SAIF members. However, assessment
rates to pay interest on Financing Corporation ("FICO") bonds incurred in an
effort to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation are higher for SAIF members (6.48 basis points for the first six
months of 1997) than for BIF members (1.3 basis points for such period). By
law the FICO assessment rate for BIF members is required to be one-fifth the
rate for SAIF members until the earlier of January 1, 2000 or such time as the
two insurance funds may be merged.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 1996, the Company had 539 active employees (including both
full-time and part-time employees) with 492 average FTEs for the 1996 year and
459 FTEs for the month of December 1996, none of whom were represented by a
collective bargaining group. Eligible employees are provided with 401(k) and
other benefits, including life, medical, dental, vision insurance and short
and long-term disability insurance.
The Company decreased total employee headcount during 1996 by 97 to achieve
organizational goals involving cost reductions, outsourcing opportunities and
changes in product focus. Areas which experienced employee reductions in 1996
included the Consumer Lending Group (a reduction of 56 employees), the Finance
Group (a reduction of 21 employees) and the Retail Financial Services Group,
other administrative services and subsidiaries (a reduction of 20 employees).
The Company may have limited staff reductions during 1997.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
General
Bank Plus is a savings and loan holding company and, as such, is subject to
OTS regulation, examination, supervision and reporting requirements. Fidelity
is a federally chartered savings bank, a member of the FHLB of San Francisco,
and its deposits are insured by the FDIC through the SAIF to the maximum
extent permitted by law. Fidelity is subject to extensive regulation by the
OTS, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, as its deposit insurer. In
addition to the statutes and regulations discussed below, Fidelity must
undergo at least one full scope, on-site safety and soundness examination
every year. The Director of the OTS is authorized to impose assessments on
Fidelity to fund OTS operations, including the cost of examinations. The FDIC
has "back-up" authority to take enforcement action against Fidelity if the OTS
fails to take such action after a recommendation by the FDIC. The FDIC may
also impose assessments on Fidelity to cover the cost of FDIC examinations.
Finally, Fidelity is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System ("FRB") with respect to certain aspects of its
business.
Changes in legislation and regulatory policy and the interpretations thereof
have materially affected the business of Fidelity and other financial
institutions in the past and are likely to do so in the future. There can be
no assurance that future changes in the regulations or their interpretation
will not adversely affect the business of Fidelity. Future legislation and
regulatory policy could also alter the structures and competitive
relationships among financial institutions. Regulatory authorities also have
the power, in certain circumstances, to prohibit or limit the payment of
dividends to holders of common stock of Fidelity. In addition, certain
regulatory actions, including general increases in federal deposit insurance
premiums, additional insurance premium assessments to
38
<PAGE>
recapitalize the SAIF or the application of the risk-based insurance premium
system to Fidelity, may increase Fidelity's operating expenses in future
periods and may have a material adverse impact on Fidelity's capital levels
and results of operations.
Bank Plus Regulation
Bank Plus is a unitary savings and loan holding company within the meaning
of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, as amended ("HOLA"). As such, Bank Plus
is required to be registered with the OTS and is subject to OTS regulations,
examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. Among other things, the
OTS has enforcement authority which permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit
activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings
institution.
Activities Restrictions. There are generally no restrictions on the
activities of a unitary savings and loan holding company. However, if the
savings institution subsidiary of such a holding company fails to meet the
qualified thrift lender ("QTL") test, then such unitary holding company also
will become subject to the activities restrictions applicable to multiple
savings and loan holding companies and, unless the savings institution
requalifies as a QTL within one year thereafter, will have to register as, and
become subject to the restrictions applicable to, a bank holding company. See
"--Fidelity--Activities Regulation Not Related to Capital Compliance."
If Bank Plus were to acquire control of another savings institution, other
than through merger or other business combination with Fidelity, Bank Plus
would thereupon become a multiple savings and loan holding company. Except
under limited circumstances, the activities of Bank Plus and any of its
subsidiaries (other than Fidelity or other subsidiary savings institutions)
would thereafter be subject to further extensive limitations. In general, such
holding company would be limited primarily to activities permissible for bank
holding companies under the Bank Holding Company Act and other activities in
which multiple savings and loan companies were authorized by regulation to
engage as of March 5, 1987.
Restrictions on Acquisitions. Except under limited circumstances, savings
and loan holding companies are prohibited from acquiring, without prior
approval of the Director of the OTS, (i) control of any other savings
institution or savings and loan holding company or substantially all the
assets thereof or (ii) more than 5% of the voting shares of a savings
institution or holding company thereof which is not a subsidiary. Except with
the prior approval of the Director of the OTS, no director or officer of a
savings and loan holding company or person owning or controlling by proxy or
otherwise more than 25% of such company's stock, may acquire control of any
savings institution, other than a subsidiary savings institution, or of any
other savings and loan holding company.
The Director of the OTS may only approve acquisitions resulting in the
formation of a multiple savings and loan holding company which controls
savings institutions in more than one state if (i) the multiple savings and
loan holding company involved controls a savings institution which operated a
home or branch office located in the state of the institution to be acquired
as of March 5, 1987; (ii) the acquiror is authorized to acquire control of the
savings institution pursuant to the emergency acquisition provisions of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("FDIA"); or (iii) the statutes of the state in
which the institution to be acquired by the state-chartered institutions or
savings and loan holding companies located in the state where the acquiring
entity is located (or by a holding company that controls such state-chartered
savings institutions).
Fidelity--Capital Requirements and Capital Categories
FIRREA Capital Requirements. The OTS capital regulations, as required by the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989
("FIRREA"), include three separate minimum capital requirements for the
savings institution industry--a "tangible capital requirement," a "leverage
limit" and a "risk-based capital requirement." These capital standards must be
no less stringent than the capital standards applicable to national banks. The
OTS also has the authority, after giving the affected institution notice and
an
39
<PAGE>
opportunity to respond, to establish an individual minimum capital requirement
("IMCR") for a savings institution which is higher than the industry minimum
requirements, upon a determination that an individual minimum capital
requirement is necessary or appropriate in light of the institution's
particular circumstances, such as if the institution is expected to have
losses resulting in capital inadequacy, has a high degree of exposure to
credit risk, has a high amount of nonperforming loans, has a high degree of
exposure to concentration of credit risk or risks arising from nontraditional
activities, or fails to adequately monitor and control the risks presented by
concentration of credit and nontraditional activities.
The industry minimum capital requirements are as follows:
Tangible capital of at least 1.5% of adjusted total assets. Tangible capital
is composed of (1) common stockholders' equity, noncumulative perpetual
preferred stock and related earnings, nonwithdrawable accounts and pledged
deposits qualifying as core capital and minority interests in the equity
accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries, after deducting (a) intangible
assets other than certain purchased mortgage servicing rights and (b) the
amount by which investments in subsidiaries engaged as principal in activities
not permissible for national banks exceeds the amount of such investments as
of April 12, 1989 and the lesser of the institution's investments in and
extensions of credit to such subsidiaries, net of any reserves established
against such investments, (i) as of April 12, 1989 and (ii) as of the date on
which the institution's tangible capital is being determined. In general,
adjusted total assets equal the institution's consolidated total assets, minus
any assets that are deducted in calculating capital.
Core capital of at least 3% of adjusted total assets (the "leverage
limit"). Core capital consists of tangible capital plus (1) goodwill resulting
from pre-April 12, 1989 acquisitions of troubled savings institutions and
(2) certain qualifying intangible assets and mortgage servicing rights.
Certain deferred tax assets must also be deducted from core capital.
Total capital of at least 8% of risk-weighted assets (the "risk-based
capital requirement"). Total capital includes both core capital and
"supplementary" capital items deemed less permanent than core capital, such as
subordinated debt and general loan loss allowances (subject to certain
limits). Equity investments (with the exception of investments in subsidiaries
and investments permissible for national banks) and portions of certain high-
risk land loans and nonresidential construction loans must be deducted from
total capital. At least half of total capital must consist of core capital.
Risk-weighted assets are determined by multiplying each category of an
institution's assets, including off balance sheet asset equivalents, by an
assigned risk weight based on the credit risk associated with those assets,
and adding the resulting products. The four risk weight categories range from
zero percent for cash and government securities to 100% for assets (including
past-due loans and real estate owned) that do not qualify for preferential
risk-weighting.
On March 18, 1994, the OTS published a final regulation effective on that
date that permits a loan secured by multifamily residential property,
regardless of the number of units, to be risk-weighted at 50% for purposes of
the risk-based capital standards if the loan meets specified criteria relating
to the term of the loan, timely payments of interest and principal, loan-to-
value ratio and ratio of net operating income to debt service requirements.
Under the prior regulation, only loans secured by multifamily residential
properties consisting of 5 to 36 units were eligible for risk-weighting at
50%, and then only if such loans had a loan-to-value ratio at origination of
not more than 80% and the collateral property had an average annual occupancy
rate of at least 80% for a year or more.
Any loans that qualified for risk-weighting under the prior regulation as of
March 18, 1994 will be "grandfathered" and will continue to be risk-weighted
at 50% as long as they continue to meet the criteria of the prior regulation.
Thus occupancy rates, which recently have been decreasing generally, will
continue to affect the risk-weighting of such grandfathered multifamily loans
unless such loans qualify for 50% risk-weighting under the criteria of the new
rule, which criteria do not include an occupancy requirement.
40
<PAGE>
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
("FDICIA"), the OTS was required to revise its risk-based capital standards to
ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest rate risk,
concentration of credit risk and risks of nontraditional activities. The OTS
has incorporated an interest rate risk component into its regulatory capital
rule. Under the rule, savings institutions with "above normal" interest rate
risk exposure would be subject to a deduction from total capital for purposes
of calculating their risk-based capital requirements. An institution whose
interest rate risk exposure (measured as set forth in the rule) exceeded 2%
would be required to deduct an interest rate risk component in calculating its
total capital under the risk-based capital rule. The interest rate risk
component is an amount equal to one-half of the difference between the
institution's measured interest rate risk and 2% multiplied by the estimated
economic value of the bank's assets. That dollar amount would be deducted from
a bank's total capital in calculating compliance with its risk-based capital
requirement. Under the rule, there is a lag between the reporting date of an
institution's financial data and the effective date for the new capital
requirement based on that data. The rule also provides that the Director of
the OTS may waive or defer a bank's interest rate risk component on a case-by-
case basis. The OTS has postponed the implementation of the new rule until the
OTS has collected sufficient data to determine whether the rule is effective
in monitoring and managing interest rate risk. No interest rate risk component
would have been required to be added to the Bank's risk-based capital
requirement at December 31, 1995 had the rule been in effect at that time.
FDICIA PCA Regulations. FDICIA required the OTS to implement a system
requiring regulatory sanctions against institutions that are not adequately
capitalized, with the sanctions growing more severe the lower the
institution's capital. The OTS has established specific capital ratios under
the PCA Regulations for five separate capital categories: well capitalized,
adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and
critically undercapitalized.
Under the OTS regulations implementing FDICIA, an institution is treated as
well capitalized if its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at
least 10.0%, its ratio of core capital to risk-weighted assets is at least
6.0%, its ratio of core capital to adjusted total assets is at least 5.0%, and
it is not subject to any order or directive by the OTS to meet a specific
capital level. An institution will be adequately capitalized if its ratio of
total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8.0%, its ratio of core
capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 4.0%, and its ratio of core
capital to adjusted total assets (leverage ratio) is at least 4.0% (3.0% if
the institution receives the highest rating on the OTS financial institutions
rating system).
An institution whose capital does not meet the amounts required in order to
be adequately capitalized will be treated as undercapitalized. If an
undercapitalized institution's capital ratios are less than 6.0% total capital
to risk-weighted assets, 3.0% core capital to risk-weighted assets, or 3.0%
core capital to adjusted total assets, it will be treated as significantly
undercapitalized. Finally, an institution will be treated as critically
undercapitalized if its ratio of "tangible equity" (core capital plus
cumulative perpetual preferred stock minus intangible assets other than
supervisory goodwill and purchased mortgage servicing rights) to adjusted
total assets is equal to or less than 2.0%. See Item 7. "MD&A--Regulatory
Capital Compliance."
Mandatory Restrictions on Undercapitalized Institutions. There are numerous
mandatory restrictions on the activities of undercapitalized institutions. An
institution that is undercapitalized must submit a capital restoration plan to
the OTS that the OTS may approve only if it determines that the plan is likely
to succeed in restoring the institution's capital and will not appreciably
increase the risks to which the institution is exposed. In addition, the
institution's performance under the plan must be guaranteed by every company
that controls the institution, up to specified limits. An institution that is
undercapitalized may not acquire an interest in any company, open a new branch
office or engage in a new line of business without OTS or FDIC approval. An
undercapitalized institution also may not increase its average total assets
during any quarter except in accordance with an approved capital restoration
plan. An undercapitalized savings institution generally may not pay any
dividends or make other capital distributions. Undercapitalized institutions
also may not pay management fees to any company or individual that controls
the institution. An undercapitalized savings institution cannot accept, renew,
or rollover deposits obtained through a deposit broker, and may not solicit
deposits by offering interest rates that are more than 75 basis points higher
than market rates. Savings institutions that are adequately capitalized but
not well
41
<PAGE>
capitalized must obtain a waiver from the FDIC in order to accept, renew, or
rollover brokered deposits, and even if a waiver is granted may not solicit
deposits, through a broker or otherwise, by offering interest rates that
exceed market rates by more than 75 basis points. The Bank accepted brokered
deposits ($0.1 million as of December 31, 1994) pursuant to a waiver obtained
from the FDIC, which waiver expired in October 1994 and had no such deposits
at December 31, 1996. The Bank is currently eligible to accept brokered
deposits.
Restrictions on Significantly and Critically Undercapitalized
Institutions. In addition to the above mandatory restrictions which apply to
all undercapitalized savings institutions, institutions that are significantly
undercapitalized may not without the OTS' prior approval (a) pay a bonus to
any senior executive officer or (b) increase any senior executive officer's
compensation over the average rate of compensation (excluding bonuses, options
and profit-sharing) during the 12 months preceding the month in which the
institution became undercapitalized. The same restriction applies to
undercapitalized institutions that fail to submit or implement an acceptable
capital restoration plan. If a savings institution is critically
undercapitalized, the institution is also generally prohibited from making
payments of principal or interest on subordinated debt beginning sixty days
after the institution becomes critically undercapitalized. In addition, the
institution cannot without prior FDIC approval enter into any material
transaction outside the ordinary course of business. Critically
undercapitalized savings institutions must be placed in receivership or
conservatorship within 90 days of becoming critically undercapitalized unless
the OTS, with the concurrence of the FDIC, determines that some other action
would better resolve the problems of the institution at the least possible
long-term loss to the insurance fund, and documents the reasons for its
determination.
Discretionary Sanctions. With respect to an undercapitalized institution,
the OTS, under certain circumstances, has the authority, among other things,
to order the institution to recapitalize by selling shares of capital stock or
other securities, order the institution to agree to be acquired by another
depository institution holding company or combine with another depository
institution, restrict transactions with affiliates, restrict the interest
rates paid by the institution on new deposits to the prevailing rates of
interest in the region where the institution is located, require the
institution to divest any subsidiary or the institution's holding company to
divest the institution or any other subsidiary or take any other action that
the OTS determines will better resolve the institution's problems at the least
possible loss to the deposit insurance fund. With respect to significantly
undercapitalized institutions and certain undercapitalized institutions, the
OTS must take certain of the above mentioned actions.
In addition to the mandatory appointment of a conservator or receiver for
critically undercapitalized institutions, described above, the OTS or FDIC may
appoint a receiver or conservator for an undercapitalized institution if it
(a) has no reasonable prospect of becoming adequately capitalized, (b) fails
to submit a capital restoration plan within the required time period or (c)
materially fails to implement its capital restoration plan.
Finally, the OTS can apply to an institution in a particular capital
category the sanctions that apply to the next lower capital category, if the
OTS determines, after providing the institution notice and opportunity for a
hearing, that (a) the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition or (b)
the institution received, in its most recent report of examination, a less-
than-satisfactory rating for asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity,
and the deficiency has not been corrected. The OTS cannot, however, use this
authority to require an adequately capitalized institution to file a capital
restoration plan, or to subject a significantly undercapitalized institution
to the sanctions applicable to critically undercapitalized institutions.
Fidelity--Activities Regulation Not Related to Capital Compliance
Safety and Soundness Standards. In addition to the PCA provisions discussed
above based on an institution's regulatory capital ratios, FDICIA contains
several measures intended to promote early identification of management
problems at depository institutions and to ensure that regulators intervene
promptly to require corrective action by institutions with inadequate
operational and managerial standards.
42
<PAGE>
FDICIA requires the OTS to prescribe minimum acceptable operational and
managerial standards, and standards for asset quality, earnings, and valuation
of publicly traded shares, for savings institutions and their holding
companies. The operational standards must cover internal controls, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and
employee compensation. The asset quality and earnings standards must specify a
maximum ratio of classified assets to capital, minimum earnings sufficient to
absorb losses, and minimum ratio of market value to book value for publicly
traded shares.
Any institution or holding company that fails to meet the standards must
submit a plan for corrective action within 30 days. If a savings institution
fails to submit or implement an acceptable plan, the OTS must order it to
correct the safety and soundness deficiency, and may restrict its rate of
asset growth, prohibit asset growth entirely, require the institution to
increase its ratio of tangible equity to assets, restrict the interest rate
paid on deposits to the prevailing rates of interest on deposits of comparable
amounts and maturities, or require the institution to take any other action
that the OTS determines will better carry out the purpose of prompt corrective
action. Imposition of these sanctions is within the discretion of the OTS in
most cases but is mandatory if the savings institution commenced operations or
experienced a change in control during the 24 months preceding the
institution's failure to meet the safety and soundness standards, or underwent
extraordinary growth during the preceding 18 months.
On August 9, 1995, the OTS and the other federal banking agencies adopted a
final rule establishing, among other things, guidelines for operational and
managerial standards relating to internal controls, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, compensation, fees and
benefits and excessive compensatory arrangements for executive officers,
employees, directors or principal shareholders. Additional guidelines setting
forth standards with respect to asset quality, earnings and stock valuation
are still being drafted by the agencies.
In addition, each depository institution with assets above $500 million must
annually prepare a report, signed by the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, on the effectiveness of the institution's internal control
structures and procedures for financial reporting, and on the institution's
compliance with laws and regulations relating to safety and soundness. The
institution's independent public accountant must attest to, and report
separately on, management's assertions in that report. The report and the
attestations, along with financial statements and such other disclosure
requirements as the FDIC and the OTS may prescribe, must be submitted to the
FDIC and OTS. Such institutions must also have an audit committee of its Board
of Directors made up entirely of directors who are independent of the
management of the institution. Audit committees of "large" institutions
(defined by the FDIC as an institution with more than $3 billion in assets,
which includes Fidelity) must include members with banking or financial
management expertise, may not include members who are large customers of the
institution, and must have access to independent counsel.
In March 1996, the OTS completed its annual safety and soundness examination
and the Company is addressing the OTS' concerns. Following the examination,
the Company received notice that it is no longer considered by the OTS to be
an institution "requiring more than normal supervision."
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. The qualified thrift lender ("QTL") test
requires that, in at least nine out of every twelve months, at least 65% of a
savings bank's "portfolio assets" must be invested in a limited list of
qualified thrift investments, primarily investments related to housing loans.
If Fidelity fails to satisfy the QTL test and does not requalify as a QTL
within one year, any entity in control of Fidelity must register and be
regulated as a bank holding company, and Fidelity must either convert to a
commercial bank charter or become subject to restrictions on branching,
business activities and dividends as if it were a national bank. Portfolio
assets consist of tangible assets minus (a) assets used to satisfy liquidity
requirements and (b) property used by the institution to conduct its business.
In 1996, the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act ("EGRPRA")
was adopted, amending the QTL requirements to allow educational loans, small
business loans and credit card loans to count as qualified thrift assets
without limit and to allow loans for personal, family or household purposes to
count as qualified thrift assets in the category limited to 20% of portfolio
assets. Prior to EGRPRA, small business loans were included in qualified
thrift assets only if made in a credit-needy area and
43
<PAGE>
educational and credit card loans were included subject to a 10% of portfolio
assets limit. The previous limit for loans for personal, family or household
purposes was also 10% of portfolio assets. Finally, EGRPRA provided that as an
alternative to the QTL test, thrifts may choose to comply with the Internal
Revenue Service's domestic building and loan tax code test.
Investments and Loans. In general, federal savings institutions such as
Fidelity may not invest directly in equity securities, noninvestment grade
debt securities or real estate, other than real estate used for the
institution's offices and related facilities. Indirect equity investment in
real estate through a subsidiary is permissible, but subject to certain
limitations and deductions from regulatory capital. Loans by a savings
institution to a single borrower are generally limited to 15% of an
institution's "unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus," which is similar
but not identical to total capital. Aggregate loans secured by nonresidential
real property are generally limited to 400% of an institution's total capital.
Commercial loans may not exceed 10% of an institution's total assets, and
consumer loans may not exceed 35% of an institution's total assets.
Activities of Subsidiaries. A savings institution seeking to establish a new
subsidiary, acquire control of an existing company or conduct a new activity
through an existing subsidiary must provide 30 days prior notice to the FDIC
and OTS. A subsidiary of Fidelity may be able to engage in activities that are
not permissible for Fidelity directly, if the OTS determines that such
activities are reasonably related to Fidelity's business, but Fidelity may be
required to deduct its investment in such a subsidiary from capital. The OTS
has the power to require a savings institution to divest any subsidiary or
terminate any activity conducted by a subsidiary that the OTS determines to be
a serious threat to the financial safety, soundness or stability of such
savings institution or to be otherwise inconsistent with sound banking
practices.
Real Estate Lending Standards. The OTS and the other federal banking
agencies have adopted regulations which require institutions to adopt and at
least annually review written real estate lending policies. The lending
policies must include diversification standards, underwriting standards
(including loan-to-value limits), loan administration procedures, and
procedures for monitoring compliance with the policies. The policies must
reflect consideration of guidelines adopted by the banking agencies. Among the
guidelines adopted by the agencies are maximum loan-to-value ratios for land
loans (65%); development loans (75%); construction loans (80%-85%); loans on
owner-occupied 1 to 4 family property, including home equity lines of credit
(no limit, but loans at or above 90% require private mortgage insurance); and
loans on other improved property (85%). The guidelines permit institutions to
make loans in excess of the supervisory loan-to-value limits if such loans are
supported by other credit factors, but the aggregate of such nonconforming
loans should not exceed the institution's risk-based capital, and the
aggregate of nonconforming loans secured by real estate other than 1 to 4
family property should not exceed 30% of risk-based capital.
Notification of New Officers and Directors. A federal savings bank that has
undergone a change in control in the preceding two years, is subject to a
supervisory agreement with the OTS or is deemed to be in "troubled condition"
by the OTS, must give the OTS 30 days notice prior to any change in its Board
of Directors or its senior executive officers. The OTS must disapprove such
change if the competence, experience or integrity of the affected individual
indicates that it would not be in the best interests of the public to permit
the appointment. Fidelity is not currently subject to this notice requirement.
Payment of Dividends and Other Capital Distributions. The payment of
dividends, stock repurchases, and other capital distributions by Fidelity to
Bank Plus is subject to regulation by the OTS. Currently, 30 days' prior
notice to the OTS of any capital distribution is required.
The OTS has promulgated a "safe-harbor" regulation that permits capital
distributions of certain amounts after providing notice to the OTS, but
without prior approval. Institutions can distribute amounts in excess of the
safe harbor only with the prior approval of the OTS. For institutions ("Tier 1
institutions") that meet their fully phased-in capital requirements (the
requirements that will apply when the phase-out of supervisory goodwill and
investments in certain subsidiaries from capital is complete), the safe harbor
amount is the greater of (a) 75% of net income for the prior four quarters, or
(b) the sum of (1) the current year's net income and (2) the amount that would
reduce the excess of the institution's total capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio over 8% to one-half of such
44
<PAGE>
excess at the beginning of the year in which the dividend is paid. For
institutions that meet their current minimum capital requirements but do not
meet their fully phased-in requirements ("Tier 2 institutions"), the safe
harbor distribution is 75% of net income for the prior four quarters. Savings
institutions that do not meet their current minimum capital requirements
("Tier 3 institutions") may not make any capital distributions, with certain
exceptions.
The OTS retains the authority to prohibit any capital distribution otherwise
authorized under the regulation if the OTS determines that the distribution
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The OTS also may reclassify a
Tier 1 institution as a Tier 2 or Tier 3 institution by notifying the
institution that it is in need of more than normal supervision. Further, an
adequately capitalized institution may not make a capital distribution if such
payment would cause the institution to become undercapitalized.
On December 5, 1994, the OTS issued a notice of proposed rulemaking to amend
the capital distribution rule to conform to the PCA system. Under the proposed
rule, adequately or well-capitalized institutions that (1) are not held by
savings and loan holding companies, (2) have a composite rating of "1" or "2,"
(3) are not deemed to be in "troubled condition" and (4) will remain at least
adequately capitalized after the proposed capital distribution are not
required to provide notice to the OTS before making capital distributions.
Other savings associations that are not in troubled condition and that will
remain at least adequately capitalized after making a capital distribution
would be required to provide notice to the OTS. Troubled associations and
undercapitalized associations would be permitted to make capital distributions
only under certain limited conditions and would be required to file an
application and receive OTS approval prior to making a capital distribution.
If the regulation is adopted as proposed, Fidelity would be required to obtain
OTS approval prior to making a capital distribution.
Required Liquidity. OTS regulations require savings institutions to
maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily balance of liquid assets
(including cash, certain time deposits, bankers' acceptances, specified United
States government, state and federal agency obligations, and balances
maintained in satisfaction of the FRB reserve requirements described below)
equal to at least 5% of the average daily balance of its net withdrawable
accounts plus short-term borrowings during the preceding calendar month. The
OTS may change this liquidity requirement from time to time to an amount
within a range of 4% to 10% of such accounts and borrowings depending upon
economic conditions and the deposit flows of member institutions, and may
exclude from the definition of liquid assets any item other than cash and the
balances maintained in satisfaction of FRB reserve requirements. Fidelity's
average regulatory liquidity ratio for the month of December 1996 was 6.86%,
and accordingly Fidelity was in compliance with the liquidity requirement.
Monetary penalties may be imposed for failure to meet liquidity ratio
requirements. OTS regulations also require each member institution to
maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily balance of short-term
liquid assets (generally those having maturities of 12 months or less) equal
to at least 1% of the average daily balance of its net withdrawable accounts
plus short-term borrowings during the preceding calendar month. The average
short-term liquidity ratio of Fidelity for the month of December 1996 was
4.36%.
Classification of Assets. Savings institutions are required to classify
their assets on a regular basis, to establish appropriate allowances for
losses and report the results of such classification quarterly to the OTS. A
savings institution is also required to set aside adequate valuation
allowances, and to establish liabilities for off-balance sheet items, such as
letters of credit, when a loss becomes probable and estimable. The OTS has the
authority to review the institution's classification of its assets and to
determine whether additional assets must be classified, or the institution's
valuation allowances must be increased. See "--Credit Administration--Loan
Monitoring."
Assets are classified as "pass", "special mention", "substandard",
"doubtful" or "loss." An asset which possesses no apparent weakness or
deficiency is designated "satisfactory". An asset which possesses weaknesses
or deficiencies deserving close attention is designated as "special mention".
An asset, or a portion thereof, is generally classified as "substandard" if it
possesses a well-defined weakness which could jeopardize the timely
liquidation of the asset or realization of the collateral at the asset's book
value. Thus, these assets are
45
<PAGE>
characterized by the possibility that the institution will sustain some loss
if the deficiencies are not corrected. An asset, or portion thereof, is
classified as "doubtful" if a probable loss of principal and/or interest
exists but the amount of the loss, if any, is subject to the outcome of future
events which are indeterminable at the time of classification. If an asset, or
portion thereof, is classified as "loss", the institution must either
establish a specific valuation allowance equal to the amount classified as
loss or charge off such amount.
Fidelity--Deposit Insurance
General. Fidelity's deposits are insured by the FDIC to the maximum limits
permitted by law. Under FIRREA, the FDIC administers two separate deposit
insurance funds: the BIF which insures the deposits of institutions that were
insured by the FDIC prior to FIRREA, and the SAIF which maintains a fund to
insure the deposits of institutions, such as Fidelity, that were insured by
the FSLIC prior to FIRREA.
Insurance Premium Assessments. The FDICIA directed the FDIC to establish a
risk-based system for setting deposit insurance premium assessments. The FDIC
has implemented such a system, under which an institution's insurance
assessments will vary depending on the level of capital the institution holds
and the degree to which it is the subject of supervisory concern to the FDIC.
Legislation was enacted on September 30, 1996, to address the disparity in
bank and thrift deposit insurance premiums. Such legislation imposed a
requirement on all SAIF member institutions to fully recapitalize the SAIF by
paying a one-time special assessment of approximately 65.7 basis points on all
assessable deposits as of March 31, 1995. This one-time special assessment of
65.7 basis points resulted in the Bank recording $18.0 million in additional
SAIF premiums. As of December 31, 1996, after giving effect to the deduction
of 65.7 basis point assessment, the Bank's core and risk-based capital ratios
are 6.29% and 11.85%, respectively, and the Bank remains well capitalized
under the PCA regulations.
Termination of Deposit Insurance. The FDIC may initiate a proceeding to
terminate an institution's deposit insurance if, among other things, the
institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations. It is
the policy of the FDIC to deem an insured institution to be in an unsafe or
unsound condition if its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is less than
2%. Tier 1 capital is similar to core capital but includes certain investments
in and extensions of credit to subsidiaries engaged in activities not
permitted for national banks.
Conversion of Deposit Insurance. Generally, under a moratorium imposed by
FIRREA, savings institutions may not convert from SAIF membership to BIF
membership until SAIF has increased its reserves to 1.25% of insured deposits.
However, a savings institution may convert to a bank charter, if the resulting
bank remains a SAIF member, and may merge with a BIF-member institution as
long as deposits attributable to the savings institution remain subject to
assessment by the SAIF. In addition, under an exception to the moratorium,
savings institutions may transfer and convert to BIF insurance (for example,
in a branch sale to a BIF-member institution) up to 35% of their deposits.
Institutions that convert from SAIF to BIF membership, either under an
exception during the moratorium or after expiration of the moratorium, must
pay exit fees to SAIF and entrance fees to BIF. In addition, legislation has
been proposed that would require all savings and loans to convert to banks.
Regulation of Fidelity Affiliates
Affiliate and Insider Transactions. The ability of Bank Plus and its non-
depository subsidiaries to deal with Fidelity is limited by the affiliate
transaction rules, including Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act,
which also govern BIF-insured banks. With very limited exceptions, these rules
require that all transactions between Fidelity and an affiliate must be on
arms' length terms. The term "affiliate" covers any company that controls or
is under common control with Fidelity, but does not include individuals and
generally does not include Fidelity's subsidiaries.
Under Section 23A and Section 11 of the HOLA, specific restrictions apply to
transactions in which Fidelity provides funding to its affiliates: Fidelity
may not purchase the securities of an affiliate, make a loan to any affiliate
that is engaged in activities not permissible for a bank holding company, or
acquire from an affiliate any asset that has been classified, a nonaccrual
loan, a restructured loan, or a loan that is more than 30 days past due.
46
<PAGE>
As to affiliates engaged in bank holding company-permissible activities, the
aggregate of (a) loans, guarantees, and letters of credit provided by the
savings bank for the benefit of any one affiliate and (b) purchases of assets
by the savings bank from the affiliate, may not exceed 10% of the savings
bank's capital stock and surplus (20% for the aggregate of permissible
transactions with all affiliates). All loans to affiliates must be secured by
collateral ranging from 100% to 130% of the amount of the loan, depending on
the type of collateral.
In addition, OTS regulations on affiliate transactions require, among other
things, that savings institutions retain records of their affiliate
transactions that reflect such transactions in reasonable detail. If a savings
institution has been the subject of a change of control application or notice
within the preceding two-year period, does not meet its minimum capital
requirements, has entered into a supervisory agreement, is subject to a formal
enforcement proceeding, or is determined by the OTS to be the subject of
supervisory concern, the institution may be required to provide the OTS with
30 days' prior notice of any affiliate transaction.
Under these regulatory limitations, loans by Fidelity to directors,
executive officers and 10% stockholders of Fidelity, Bank Plus, and Bank Plus'
subsidiaries (collectively, "insiders"), or to a corporation or partnership
that is at least 10% owned by an insider (a "related interest") are subject to
limits separate from the affiliate transaction rules. However, a company that
controls a savings institution is excluded from the coverage of the insider
lending rules even if it owns 10% or more of the stock of the institution, and
is subject only to the affiliate transaction rules. All loans to insiders and
their related interests must be underwritten and made on non-preferential
terms; loans in excess of $500,000 must be approved in advance by Fidelity's
Board of Directors; and Fidelity's total of such loans may not exceed 100% of
Fidelity's capital. Loans by Fidelity to its executive officers are subject to
additional limits which are even more stringent. In addition to these
regulatory limitations, Fidelity has adopted a policy which requires prior
approval of its Board of Directors for any loans to insiders or their related
interests.
Enforcement. Whenever the OTS has reasonable cause to believe that the
continuation by a savings and loan holding company of any activity or of
ownership or control of any non FDIC-insured subsidiary constitutes a serious
risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of a savings and loan
holding company's subsidiary savings institution and is inconsistent with the
sound operation of the savings institution, the OTS may order the holding
company, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, to terminate such
activities or to divest such noninsured subsidiary. FIRREA also empowers the
OTS, in such a situation, to issue a directive without any notice or
opportunity for a hearing, which directive may (a) limit the payment of
dividends by the savings institution, (b) limit transactions between the
savings institution and its holding company or its affiliates and (c) limit
any activity of the association that creates a serious risk that the
liabilities of the holding company and its affiliates may be imposed on the
savings institution.
In addition, FIRREA includes savings and loan holding companies within the
category of person designated as "institution-affiliated parties." An
institution-affiliated party may be subject to significant penalties and/or
loss of voting rights in the event such party took any action for or toward
causing, bringing about, participating in, counseling, or aiding and abetting
a violation of law or unsafe or unsound practice by a savings institution.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") requires each savings institution, as
well as other lenders, to identify and delineate the communities served
through and by the institution's offices and to affirmatively meet the credit
needs of its delineated communities and to market the types of credit the
institution is prepared to extend within such communities. The CRA also
requires the OTS to assess the performance of the institution in meeting the
credit needs of its community and to take such assessment into consideration
in reviewing applications for mergers, acquisitions, and other transactions.
An unsatisfactory CRA rating may be the basis for denying such an application.
Performance is assessed on the basis of an institution's actual lending,
service and investment performance rather than the extent to which the
institution conducts needs assessments, documents community outreach or
complies with other procedural requirements. In connection with its assessment
of CRA performance, the OTS assigns a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory,"
"needs improvement" or "substantial noncompliance." Based on its most recent
examination, Fidelity was rated "satisfactory."
47
<PAGE>
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Federal Home Loan Banks provide a credit facility for member
institutions. As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, Fidelity is required
to own capital stock in the FHLB of San Francisco in an amount at least equal
to the greater of 1% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid home
loans, home purchase contracts and similar obligations at the end of each
calendar year, assuming for such purposes that at least 30% of its assets were
home mortgage loans, or 5% of its advances from the FHLB of San Francisco. At
December 31, 1996, Fidelity was in compliance with this requirement with an
investment in the stock of the FHLB of San Francisco of $52.3 million. Long-
term FHLB advances may be obtained only for the purpose of providing funds for
residential housing finance and all FHLB advances must be secured by specific
types of collateral.
Federal Reserve System
The FRB requires savings institutions to maintain noninterest-earning
reserves against certain of their transaction accounts (primarily deposit
accounts that may be accessed by writing unlimited checks) and non-personal
time deposits. For the calculation period at December 31, 1996, Fidelity was
required to maintain $4.9 million in noninterest-earning reserves and was in
compliance with this requirement. The balances maintained to meet the reserve
requirements imposed by the FRB may be used to satisfy Fidelity's liquidity
requirements discussed above.
As a creditor and a financial institution, Fidelity is subject to certain
regulations promulgated by the FRB, including, without limitation, Regulation
B (Equal Credit Opportunity Act), Regulation D (Reserves), Regulation E
(Electronic Funds Transfers Act), Regulation F (limits on exposure to any one
correspondent depository institution), Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act),
Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act), and Regulation DD (Truth in
Savings Act). As creditors of loans secured by real property and as owners of
real property, financial institutions, including Fidelity, may be subject to
potential liability under various statutes and regulations applicable to
property owners, generally including statutes and regulations relating to the
environmental condition of the property. See "--Regulation and Supervision--
Non-Banking Regulation."
Non-Banking Regulation
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, a
current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the
costs of removal or remediation of hazardous substances on, under or in such
property. In addition, any person or entity who arranges for the disposal or
treatment of hazardous substances may also be liable for the costs of removal
or remediation of hazardous substances at the disposal or treatment facility.
Such laws and regulations often impose liability regardless of fault and
liability has been interpreted to be joint and several unless the harm is
divisible and there is a reasonable basis for allocation of responsibility.
Pursuant to these laws and regulations, under certain circumstances, a lender
may become liable for the environmental liabilities in connection with its
borrowers' properties, if, among other things, it either forecloses or
participates in the management of its borrowers' operations or hazardous
substance handling or disposal practices. Although the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA") and
certain state counterparts provide exemptions for secured lenders, the scope
of such exemptions is limited and a rule issued by the Environmental
Protection Agency clarifying such exemption under CERCLA has recently been
held invalid. In addition, CERCLA and certain state counterparts impose a
statutory lien, which may be prior to the Banks' interest securing a loan, for
certain costs incurred in connection with removal or remediation of hazardous
substances. Other laws and regulations may also require the removal or
remediation of hazardous substances located on a property before such property
may be sold or transferred.
It is the Bank's current policy to identify and review certain environmental
issues pertaining to its borrowers and the properties securing the loans of
its borrowers prior to making any loan and foreclosing on any multifamily
property. If such review reveals any environmental issues, a Phase I
environmental audit (which generally involves a physical inspection without
any sampling) and under certain circumstances, a Phase II environmental audit
(which generally involves sampling) may be conducted by an independent
environmental
48
<PAGE>
consultant. It is also the Bank's current policy with respect to loans secured
by residential property with five or more units to automatically conduct a
Phase I environmental audit prior to foreclosing on such property. Under
certain circumstances, the Bank may decide not to foreclose on a property.
There can be no assurances that such review, Phase I environmental audits or
Phase II environmental audits have identified or will identify all potential
environmental liabilities that may exist with respect to a foreclosed property
or a property securing any loan or that historical, current or future uses of
such property or surrounding properties will not result in the imposition of
environmental liability on the Bank.
The Bank is aware that certain current or former properties on which it has
foreclosed and properties securing its loans contain contamination or
hazardous substances, including asbestos and lead paint. Under certain
circumstances, the Bank may be required to remove or remediate such
contamination or hazardous substances. Although the Bank is not aware of any
environmental liability relating to these properties that it believes would
have a material adverse effect on its business or results of operations, there
can be no assurances that the costs of any required removal or remediation
would not be material or substantially exceed the value of affected properties
or the loans secured by the properties or that the Bank's ability to sell any
foreclosed property would not be adversely affected.
Gateway
Gateway has been an NASD registered broker/dealer since October 1993 and
offers securities products, such as mutual funds and variable annuities, to
customers of the Bank. Fixed annuities are offered through the Bank's
insurance agency, Citadel Service Corporation, dba, Fidelity Insurance Agency
of Glendale. Gateway does not maintain security or cash accounts for customers
or perform custodial functions relating to customer securities.
Gateway is required to conduct its activities in compliance with the
February 1994 interagency guidelines of the federal bank and thrift regulators
on retail sales of uninsured, nondeposit investment products by federally
insured financial institutions. The interagency guidelines require that, among
other things, customers are fully informed that investment products are not
insured, are not deposits of or guaranteed by the Bank and involve investment
risk including the potential loss of principal.
The securities business is subject to regulation by the SEC and other
federal and state agencies. Regulatory violations can result in the revocation
of broker/dealer licenses, the imposition of censures or fines and the
suspension or expulsion from the securities business of a firm, its officers
or employees. With the enactment of the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud
Enforcement Act of 1988, the SEC and the securities exchanges have intensified
their regulation of broker/dealers, emphasizing in particular the need for
supervision and control by broker/dealers of their own employees. In 1994,
Gateway was audited by the NASD, SEC and the State of California Department of
Corporations.
The NASD has initiated proposed changes to the Rules of Fair Practice. The
proposed rules respond to continuing concerns about the lack of clear guidance
for NASD members in the nature of specific rules or regulations that address
the activities of bank-affiliated broker/dealers. The rules apply exclusively
to the activities of NASD members that are conducting broker/dealer services
on the premises of a financial institution where retail deposits are taken.
The main focus of the proposed rules is to minimize confusion by retail
customers. The proposed rules cover broker/dealer conduct on the premises of
financial institutions, the physical location of sales activity, the use of
signage, use of confidential financial information, personnel registration,
personnel compensation, supervision and responsibility, customer disclosure,
and communication with the public. The new rules will not become final until
approved by the SEC.
As a broker/dealer registered with the NASD, Gateway is subject to the SEC's
uniform net capital rules, designed to measure the general financial condition
and liquidity of a broker/dealer. Gateway is required to file monthly reports
with the NASD and annual reports with the NASD and SEC containing detailed
financial information with respect to its broker/dealer operation.
49
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
In February 1996, the executive offices of Fidelity relocated to 4565
Colorado Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90039. This facility also houses
the Bank's administrative operations and has approximately 130,000 square feet
of office space. Present local zoning entitlements will allow for the
construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of additional office space
plus parking on this 7.75-acre parcel. The potential for increasing the amount
of office space at this Los Angeles site would satisfy Company's anticipated
facilities requirements for the foreseeable future.
The aggregate net book value of all owned administrative facilities was
approximately $15.4 million as of December 31, 1996. On December 31, 1996,
Fidelity owned 12 of its branch facilities having an aggregate net book value
of approximately $6.3 million, and leased the remaining 21 of its branch
facilities under leases with terms (including optional extension periods)
expiring from 1997 through 2050. The aggregate annual rent under leases as of
December 31, 1996 was approximately $3.3 million and the aggregate net book
value of Fidelity's leasehold improvements associated with leased premises was
approximately $1.7 million. At December 31, 1996, Fidelity owned furniture,
fixtures and equipment, related to both owned and leased facilities, having a
net book value of approximately $7.6 million.
All owned and leased office facilities are located in Southern California.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Bank was named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit
alleging violations of federal securities laws in connection with the offering
of common stock by the Bank in 1994 as part of the Bank's previously reported
1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization. The suit was filed by Harbor Finance
Partners ("Harbor") in an alleged class action complaint in the United States
District Court-Central District of California on July 28, 1995 and originally
named as defendants the Bank, Citadel, Richard M. Greenwood (the Bank's chief
executive officer and Citadel's former chief executive officer), J. P. Morgan
Securities, Inc., and Deloitte & Touche LLP. The suit alleged that false or
misleading information was provided by the defendants in connection with the
Bank's 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization and stock offering and that the
defendants knew and failed to disclose negative information concerning the
Bank. A motion to dismiss the original complaint was filed by the Bank, and
was granted without opposition. The amended complaint did not include J. P.
Morgan Securities, Inc. and Deloitte & Touche LLP as defendants and contained
some factual and legal contentions which were different from those set forth
originally. On May 21, 1996, the court granted the Bank's and Greenwood's
motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, but granted leave to amend.
Following the filing of a second amended complaint, the Bank and Greenwood
filed a motion to dismiss. At a hearing on July 22, 1996, the court ruled that
the case should be dismissed with prejudice and a formal order to that effect
was submitted to the court for execution. Harbor lodged certain objections to
the proposed order, including objections that the state law claims in the
second amended complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice. The court's
order of dismissal was entered on August 5, 1996 and provided that all claims
asserted in the second amended complaint under federal law were dismissed with
prejudice and those under state law were dismissed without prejudice to their
renewal in state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. (S)1367(b)(3). Harbor has filed a
notice of appeal to the order of dismissal. The appeal is now in the briefing
stage. On August 30, 1996, Harbor filed an alleged class action complaint in
state court containing allegations similar to those raised in the federal
court action as well as claims for unfair business practices to which the Bank
and Greenwood have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a legally
sufficient claim.
Both the original complaint filed by Harbor and the amended complaints in
the federal court action and the complaint in the state court action raise
certain issues previously pleaded in a wrongful termination and defamation
action brought by William Strocco ("Strocco") against the Bank and Citadel,
which was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on March 9, 1995.
Plaintiff in the Strocco case is a former manager of the Bank's REO department
who alleged, among other things, that his employment was terminated in
violation of public policy and was a result of breaches of his implied
employment contract and the implied covenant of good
50
<PAGE>
faith and fair dealing based on the notion that he was discriminated against
for complaining about various aspects of the Bank's 1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization, including the selling of REO properties in bulk sales, as
not in the best interests of the Bank, and that he asserted that the same were
not fully disclosed or were misrepresented to potential investors and to the
OTS. Negotiations between the parties resulted in the action being settled for
a non-material amount just prior to year-end 1996; the determination of the
settlement amount was primarily based on costs of defense and management
distraction, and the Bank and Greenwood continue to assert that none of
Strocco's allegations were true.
In addition, the Bank is a defendant in several individual and purported
class actions brought by several borrowers which raise similar claims with
respect to the manner in which the Bank serviced certain adjustable rate
mortgages which were originated during the period 1983 through 1988. The
actions have been filed between July 1, 1992 and February of 1995. In one case
the Bank won a summary judgement in Federal District Court. This judgment was
appealed. On July 25, 1996, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed its
opinion which affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded back to the
Federal District Court for further hearing. In three Los Angeles Superior
Court cases, judgment in favor of the Bank was recently entered. Plaintiff has
appealed in all three cases. Two other cases are pending in the Los Angeles
Superior Court. The plaintiffs' principal claim is that the Bank selected an
inappropriate review date to consult the index upon which the rate adjustment
is based that was one or two months earlier than what was required under the
terms of the notes. In a declining interest rate environment, the lag effect
of an earlier review period defers the benefit to the borrower of such
decline, and the reverse would be true in a rising interest rate environment.
The Bank strongly disputes these contentions and is vigorously defending these
suits. The legal responsibility and financial exposure of these claims
presently cannot be reasonably ascertained and, accordingly, there is a risk
that the final outcome of one or more of these claims could result in the
payment of monetary damages which could be material in relation to the
financial condition or results of operations of the Bank. The Bank does not
believe the likelihood of such a result is probable and has not established
any specific litigation reserves with respect to such lawsuits.
In July 1996, the Bank settled an aggregate of $18.3 million of claims
asserted by a purchaser of assets from the Bank in a 1994 Bulk Sale
transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Bank received
$0.4 million and the parties executed mutual releases with respect to all
claims arising out of that particular Bulk Sale transaction.
In the normal course of business, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries have a number of other lawsuits and claims pending. Although
there can be no assurance, the Company's management and its counsel believe
that none of the foregoing lawsuits or claims will have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition or business of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
51
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
MARKET INFORMATION
Effective March 14, 1996, Fidelity's Common Stock was listed and quoted on
NASDAQ. Commencing May 1996, in connection with the Reorganization, the
Company's Common Stock was listed and quoted on NASDAQ replacing Fidelity's
Common Stock. During 1995 and part of 1994, the Class A Common Stock of the
Bank was traded over the counter and quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin
Board (the "OTCBB").
The following table sets forth the high and low daily closing sales prices
of the Common Stock on NASDAQ commencing May 5, 1996 and the high and low bid
price on the OTCBB board between May 5, 1995 and May 5, 1996 for each of the
following quarters:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
1996(1)
Fourth quarter............................................ $11.75 $10.63
Third quarter............................................. 10.63 8.75
Second quarter............................................ 9.50 8.63
First quarter............................................. 9.75 8.50
1995(1)(2)
Fourth quarter............................................ 9.25 5.50
Third quarter............................................. 11.50 6.00
Second quarter............................................ 18.00 11.00
First quarter............................................. 20.00 16.00
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Closing sale prices reflect the one-for-four Reverse Stock Split approved
by the stockholders on February 9, 1996.
(2) Prior to May 5, 1995, the Class A Common Stock was not quoted on the OTCBB
and bid prices were provided by J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
HOLDERS OF RECORD
The number of holders of record of the Company's Common Stock at March 3,
1997 was 315.
DIVIDENDS
Bank Plus has paid no dividends on the Common Stock since its formation in
May 1996. Prior thereto, Fidelity had not paid dividends on its Common Stock
since August 1994. Bank Plus currently has no plans to pay dividends on the
Common Stock. Bank Plus is a holding company with no significant assets other
than its investment in the Bank and Gateway, and is substantially dependent on
dividends from such subsidiaries to meet its cash requirements. The ability of
the Bank to pay dividends or to make certain loans or advances to Bank Plus is
subject to significant restrictions. See Item 1. "Business--Regulation and
Supervision--Fidelity--Activities Regulation Not Related to Capital
Compliance" and " --Regulation of Fidelity Affiliates."
52
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The table below sets forth certain historical financial data regarding the
Company. This information is derived in part from, and should be read in
conjunction with, the Company's consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Item 8.--Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets............ $3,330,290 $3,299,444 $3,709,838 $4,389,781 $4,695,518
Total loans, net........ 2,691,931 2,935,116 3,288,303 3,712,051 3,990,449
Deposits................ 2,495,933 2,600,869 2,697,272 3,368,664 3,459,648
FHLB advances........... 449,851 292,700 332,700 326,400 581,400
Other borrowings........ 140,000 150,000 500,000 407,830 327,000
Preferred stock issued
by consolidated
subsidiary............. 51,750 -- -- -- --
Subordinated notes...... -- -- -- 60,000 60,000
Stockholders' equity.... 161,657 229,043 156,547 182,284 220,171
Stockholders' equity per
common share(1)(2)..... 8.86 9.72 (3) 24.11 173.51 209.57
Common shares
outstanding(1)(2)...... 18,245,265 18,242,465 6,492,465 1,050,561 1,050,561
OPERATING DATA:
Interest income......... $ 237,913 $ 246,477 $ 241,465 $ 289,331 $ 370,715
Interest expense........ 152,623 174,836 155,828 188,494 240,124
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income..... 85,290 71,641 85,637 100,837 130,591
Provision for estimated
loan losses............ 15,610 69,724 (4) 65,559 65,100 51,180
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net interest income
after provision for
estimated loan losses.. 69,680 1,917 20,078 35,737 79,411
Gains (losses) on loan
sales, net............. 22 522 (3,963) 194 1,117
Gains on securities and
trading activities,
net.................... 1,336 4,098 1,130 1,304 --
Gains on sales of
servicing.............. -- 4,604 -- -- --
Fee income from sale of
uninsured investment
products(5)............ 4,456 4,117 3,419 -- 2,606
Loans, retail banking
and other fees......... 5,339 6,866 9,040 8,660 12,291
Real estate operations.. (8,907) (9,145) (17,419) (48,843) (22,261)
SAIF special assessment. (18,000) -- -- -- --
1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization
charges, net........... -- -- (65,394) -- --
Operating expense other
than SAIF special
assessment and
1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization
charges................ (64,451) (81,954) (91,859) (98,732) (75,044)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(Loss) before income
taxes and minority
interest in subsidiary. (10,525) (68,975) (144,968) (101,680) (1,880)
Income tax (benefit)
expense................ (1,093) 4 (16,524) (35,793) (2,167)
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) earnings
before minority
interest in subsidiary. (9,432) (68,979) (128,444) (65,887) 287
Minority interest in
subsidiary
(dividends on
subsidiary preferred
stock)................. (4,657) -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) earnings..... (14,089) (68,979) (128,444) (65,887) 287
Preferred stock
dividends.............. (1,553) -- -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Net (loss) earnings
available for common
stockholders........... $ (15,642) $ (68,979) $ (128,444) $ (65,887) $ 287
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Net (loss) earnings per
common share(1)(2)..... $ (0.86) $ (8.84) $ (39.08) $ (62.72) $ 0.27
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Weighted average common
shares
outstanding(1)(2)...... 18,242,887 7,807,201 3,286,960 1,050,561 1,050,561
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(continued)
53
<PAGE>
(continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SELECTED OPERATING
RATIOS:
(Loss) return on average
assets................. (0.42)% (1.92)% (3.17)% (1.43)% 0.01%
(Loss) return on average
equity................. (7.01)%(6) (42.31)% (83.00)% (29.99)% 0.13%
Average equity divided
by average assets...... 6.71 % 4.54 % 3.82 % 4.77 % 4.57%
Ending equity divided by
ending assets.......... 4.85 % 6.94 % 4.22 % 4.15 % 4.69%
Operating expense to
average assets(7)...... 1.94 % 2.28 % 2.27 % 2.14 % 1.52%
Efficiency ratio(8)..... 67.77 % 89.81 % 97.58 % 79.66 % 45.38%
Interest rate spread for
the period............. 2.31 % 1.89 % 2.24 % 2.31 % 2.66%
Net yield on interest-
earning assets......... 2.63 % 2.05 % 2.22 % 2.31 % 2.80%
ASSET QUALITY DATA:
NPAs(9)................. $ 60,788 $ 71,431 $ 85,729 $235,621 $234,405
NPAs to total assets.... 1.83 % 2.16 % 2.31 % 5.37 % 4.99%
Nonaccruing loans....... $ 36,125 $ 51,910 $ 71,614 $ 93,475 $112,041
Nonaccruing loans to
total loans, net....... 1.34 % 1.77 % 2.18 % 2.52 % 2.83%
Classified assets....... $174,096 219,077 $141,536 $372,502 $353,738
Classified assets to
total assets........... 5.23 % 6.64 % 3.82 % 8.49 % 7.53%
REGULATORY CAPITAL
RATIOS:
Tangible capital ratio.. 6.28 % 6.91 % 4.28 % 4.10 % 4.27%
Core capital ratio...... 6.29 % 6.92 % 4.29 % 4.15 % 4.35%
Risk-based capital
ratio.................. 11.85 % 12.43 % 8.28 % 9.32 % 9.76%
OTHER DATA:
Sales of investment
products(5)............ $118,061 $ 89,824 $112,430 $ 96,253 $ 77,078
Real estate loans
funded................. $ 13,859 $ 19,396 $521,580 $422,355 $435,690
Average interest rate on
new loans.............. 8.41 % 9.61 % 5.85 % 6.75 % 7.77%
Loans sold, net(10)..... $ (2,069) $ 390 $273,272 $115,003 $204,435
Number of:
Real estate loan
accounts (in
thousands)............ 11 12 14 16 18
Deposit accounts (in
thousands)............ 194 207 216 241 233
Retail branch
offices(11)........... 33 33 33 42 43
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) For the periods prior to August 4, 1994, Fidelity's one share owned by
Citadel, its former holding company and sole stockholder, has been
retroactively reclassified into 1,050,561 shares of Class A Common Stock.
(2) On February 9, 1996, the Bank's stockholders approved the Reverse Stock
Split. All per share data and weighted average common shares outstanding
have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this change.
(3) Calculation excludes $51.8 million of preferred stock issued by
consolidated subsidiary.
(4) In 1995, the Bank recorded a $45 million loan portfolio charge in
connection with its adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See
Item 7. "MD&A--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
(5) Includes 100% of Gateway investment product sales.
(6) Net of dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary of $1.6 million.
(7) Excludes the impact of the SAIF special assessment and the net 1994
Restructuring and Recapitalization charges.
(8) The efficiency ratio is computed by dividing total operating expense by
net interest income and noninterest income, excluding infrequent items,
provisions for estimated loan and real estate losses, direct costs of real
estate operations and gains/losses on the sale of securities.
(9) NPAs include nonaccruing loans and foreclosed real estate, net of SVAs,
writedowns and REO GVA, if any.
(10) Excludes loans sold in certain Bulk Sales consummated in 1994, and is net
of repurchases.
(11) All retail branch offices are located in Southern California.
54
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K,
including without limitation statements containing the words "believes,"
"anticipates," "intends," "expects" and words of similar import, constitute
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act. Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the
following: the continuing impact of California's economic recession on
collateral values and the ability of certain borrowers to repay their
obligations to Fidelity; the potential risk associated with the Bank's high
level of nonperforming assets and other assets with increased risk; changes in
or amendments to regulatory authorities' capital requirements or other
regulations applicable to Fidelity; fluctuations in interest rates; increased
levels of competition for loans and deposits; and other factors referred to in
this Form 10-K. Given these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed
on such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to
update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions
to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future
events or developments.
OVERVIEW
Bank Plus, through Fidelity, operates 33 full-service branches, all of which
are located in Southern California, principally in Los Angeles and Orange
Counties. The Company offers a broad range of consumer financial services
including demand and term deposits and loans to consumers. At this time, the
Company primarily provides residential mortgages and consumer loans, which the
Company does not underwrite or fund, by referral to certain established
providers of mortgage and consumer loan products with which the Company has
negotiated strategic alliances. In addition, through Gateway, an NASD
registered broker/dealer, the Company provides customers with uninsured
investment products, including a number of mutual funds, annuities and unit
investment trusts.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company reported a net loss of $14.1 million before dividends on
preferred stock of subsidiary of $1.6 million, ($0.86 per common share after
giving effect to the dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary; computed on
the basis of 18,242,887 weighted average common shares outstanding) for the
year ended December 31, 1996. Without the SAIF special assessment of $18.0
million, the Company would have reported earnings of $3.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 1996, before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary.
This compares to a net loss of $69.0 million ($8.84 per common share; computed
on the basis of 7,807,201 weighted average common shares outstanding) for the
year ended December 31, 1995.
Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1996, excluding the
SAIF special assessment of $18.0 million, as compared to the same period in
1995, reflect: (a) a decrease in provisions for loan losses of $54.1 million
due in part to the 1995 loan portfolio charge of $45 million which was a
consequence of the adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan, with no
comparable amount in 1996, and the reduction of NPAs during 1996, and (b)
increased net interest income of $13.6 million due primarily to the impact of
lower interest rates on the Company's interest-bearing liabilities and
utilization of the capital raised in 1995 and (c) an increase of $1.1 million
in income tax benefits resulting from the filing of various amended federal
income tax returns to reflect a specified liability loss carryback under
Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 172 (f). These favorable changes were
partially offset by, (a) decreased gains on sales of loans, investment
securities and mortgage-backed securities of $3.3 million, (b) a gain on sale
of servicing of $4.6 million in 1995 with no comparable amounts in 1996, (c)
decreased loan fee income of $1.3 million primarily due to the sale of
servicing in 1995, and (d) preferred stock dividends of the Bank of $4.7
million reported as minority interest with no comparable amounts in 1995.
55
<PAGE>
The Company reported a net loss of $69.0 million ($8.84 per common share;
computed on the basis of 7,807,201 weighted average common shares outstanding)
for the year ended December 31, 1995. This compares to a net loss of $128.4
million ($39.08 per common share; computed on the basis of 3,286,960 weighted
average common shares outstanding) for the year ended December 31, 1994.
Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 1995, as compared to
the same period in 1994, reflect: (a) net 1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization charges, with no comparable amounts in 1995, consisting of
provisions for estimated losses on assets held for the Bulk Sale of $56.3
million and $14.1 million of other 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization
related expenses, partially offset by the branch sales gain of $5.0 million,
(b) increased noninterest income of $18.9 million, due to decreased real
estate losses and costs as well as gains recognized on the sale of loans,
securities and loan servicing rights and (c) decreased operating expenses of
$9.9 million related to personnel and other cost reductions. These favorable
changes were partially offset by (a) an increase in provisions for loan losses
of $4.2 million due to a loan portfolio charge of $45 million as a consequence
of the adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan, partially offset by
a decrease in loan loss provisions due to a reduction in the amount of NPAs,
(b) a decrease of $16.5 million in income tax benefits resulting from annual
limitations of the Bank's net operating loss carryback potential, and (c) a
decrease in net interest income of $14.0 million caused by increasing rates
paid on deposits and borrowings not offset by increasing loan yields due to
the lag in repricing of the Bank's primarily adjustable rate loan portfolio
and a decrease in interest-earning assets.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on loans, MBSs
and investment securities ("interest-earning assets") and interest paid on
savings deposits and borrowings ("interest-bearing liabilities").
For the year ended December 31, 1996, net interest income totaled $85.3
million, representing an increase of $13.7 million from $71.6 million for the
comparable period in 1995. Net interest income in 1995 declined by $14.0
million from 1994.
Net interest income is affected by (a) the average volume and repricing
characteristics of the Bank's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, (b) the level and volatility of market interest rates, (c) the
level of nonaccruing loans and (d) the interest rate spread between the yields
earned and the rates paid. Additionally, in 1994, net interest income was
negatively impacted by the Bulk Sales in that interest income was apportioned
between the Bank and the buyers, while the Bank bore the entire related
interest cost to carry the assets.
56
<PAGE>
The following table presents the primary determinants of net interest income
for the periods indicated. For the purpose of this analysis, nonaccrual loans
are included in the average balances, and delinquent interest on such loans has
been deducted from interest income.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
DAILY YIELD/ DAILY YIELD/ DAILY YIELD/
BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE BALANCE INTEREST RATE
---------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest-earning assets:
Loans................. $2,901,908 $213,013 7.34% $3,196,024 $227,710 7.12% $3,566,045 $226,949 6.36%
Mortgage-backed
securities........... 78,242 5,772 7.38 55,538 3,535 6.37 53,369 2,868 5.37
Investment securities. 233,797 16,056 6.87 201,243 12,794 6.36 178,655 9,081 5.08
Investment in FHLB
stock................ 50,976 3,072 6.03 48,373 2,438 5.04 50,185 2,567 5.12
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total interest-
earning assets...... 3,264,923 237,913 7.29 3,501,178 246,477 7.04 3,848,254 241,465 6.27
-------- -------- --------
Noninterest-earning
assets................. 57,351 87,525 203,454
---------- ---------- ----------
Total assets......... $3,322,274 $3,588,703 $4,051,708
========== ========== ==========
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
Deposits:
Demand deposits...... $ 298,287 3,098 1.04 $ 304,644 2,767 0.91 $ 367,828 3,299 0.90
Savings deposits..... 137,885 3,743 2.71 167,000 4,469 2.68 325,367 7,635 2.35
Time deposits........ 2,103,369 113,424 5.38 2,207,145 121,006 5.47 2,285,717 97,376 4.26
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total deposits..... 2,539,541 120,265 4.72 2,678,789 128,242 4.79 2,978,912 108,310 3.64
Borrowings............. 515,435 32,358 6.26 716,267 46,594 6.51 887,980 47,518 5.35
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
Total interest-
bearing liabilities. 3,054,976 152,623 4.98 3,395,056 174,836 5.15 3,866,892 155,828 4.03
-------- -------- --------
Non-interest-bearing
liabilities............ 44,251 30,615 30,069
Preferred stock issued
by consolidated
subsidiary............. 51,750
Stockholders' equity.... 171,297 163,032 154,747
---------- ---------- ----------
Total liabilities and
equity.............. $3,322,274 $3,588,703 $4,051,708
========== ========== ==========
Net interest income;
interest rate spread... $ 85,290 2.31% $ 71,641 1.89% $ 85,637 2.24%
======== ==== ======== ==== ======== ====
Net yield on interest
earning assets......... 2.63% 2.05% 2.22%
==== ==== ====
Average nonaccruing loan
balance included in
average loan balance... $ 60,364 $ 76,758 $ 131,096
========== ========== ==========
Net delinquent interest
removed from interest
income................. $ 6,018 $ 5,813 $ 10,895
======== ======== ========
Reduction in net yield
on interest-earning
assets due to
delinquent interest (in
basis points).......... 18 17 28
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
57
<PAGE>
The following tables present the dollar amount of changes in interest income
and expense for each major component of interest-earning assets and interest-
bearing liabilities and the amount of change attributable to changes in
average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. Because of
numerous changes in both balances and rates, it is difficult to allocate
precisely the effects thereof. For purposes of these tables, the change due to
volume is initially calculated as the change in average balance multiplied by
the average rate during the prior period and the change due to rate is
calculated as the change in average rate multiplied by the average volume
during the prior period. Any change that remains unallocated after such
calculations is allocated proportionately to changes in volume and changes in
rates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
COMPARED TO COMPARED TO
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 DECEMBER 31, 1994
FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE) FAVORABLE (UNFAVORABLE)
--------------------------- ----------------------------
VOLUME RATE NET VOLUME RATE NET
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income:
Loans................. $(21,530) $ 6,833 $(14,697) $(24,838) $ 25,599 $ 761
Mortgage-backed
securities........... 1,612 625 2,237 119 548 667
Investment securities. 2,181 1,081 3,262 1,240 2,473 3,713
Investment in FHLB
stock................ 136 498 634 (90) (39) (129)
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest
income............. (17,601) 9,037 (8,564) (23,569) 28,581 5,012
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Interest expense:
Deposits:
Demand deposits..... 59 (390) (331) 568 (269) 299
Savings deposits.... 776 (50) 726 4,014 (1,324) 2,690
Time deposits....... 5,379 2,203 7,582 3,444 (26,365) (22,921)
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total deposits.... 6,214 1,763 7,977 8,026 (27,958) (19,932)
Borrowings............ 11,563 2,673 14,236 9,143 (8,219) 924
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total interest
expense............ 17,777 4,436 22,213 17,169 (36,177) (19,008)
-------- ------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Increase (decrease)
in net interest
income............. $ 176 $13,473 $ 13,649 $ (6,400) $ (7,596) $(13,996)
======== ======= ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The $13.7 million increase in net interest income between 1996 and 1995 was
primarily the result of generally decreasing rates and the lag effect on the
COFI portfolio, (see "--Asset/Liability Management") utilization of new
capital raised in 1995, and a lower level of average interest-bearing
liabilities. This was partially offset by a decline in the level of average
interest-earning loans caused by run-off.
The $14.0 million decrease in net interest income between 1995 and 1994 was
primarily the result of increased rates on average interest-bearing
liabilities combined with a decline in the average level of interest-earning
assets. These changes were partially offset by a decline in the level of
interest-bearing liabilities and increased rates on interest-earning assets.
The Company's net interest income, interest rate margin and operating
results have been negatively affected by the level of loans on nonaccrual
status. Gross balances of nonaccruing loans peaked in July 1994 at
$171 million and averaged $60.4 million, $76.8 million, and $131.1 million in
1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively. As a result, the Company's net interest
rate margin was decreased by 18, 17, and 28 basis points in those years,
respectively.
58
<PAGE>
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on the
Company's loans, MBSs and investment securities ("interest-earning assets")
and interest paid on its deposits and borrowings ("interest-bearing
liabilities"). Net interest income is affected by the interest rate spread,
which is the difference between the rates earned on the Company's interest-
earning assets and rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities, as well as
the relative amounts of its interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities. The Company's average interest rate spread for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 was 2.31% 1.89%, and 2.24%, respectively.
The objective of interest rate risk management is to maximize the net income
of the Company while controlling interest rate risk exposure. Banks and
savings institutions are subject to interest rate risk when assets and
liabilities mature or reprice at different times (duration risk), against
different indices (basis risk) or for different terms (yield curve risk). The
decision to control or accept interest rate risk can only be made with an
understanding of the probability of various scenarios occurring. Having
liabilities that reprice more quickly than assets is beneficial when interest
rates fall, but may be detrimental when interest rates rise.
The Company manages interest rate risk by, among other things, maintaining a
portfolio consisting primarily of ARM loans. ARM loans comprised 97%, of the
total loan portfolio at December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994. The percentage of
monthly adjustable ARMs to total loans was approximately 76%, 75%, and 74% at
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, respectively. Interest sensitive assets
provide the Company with a degree of long-term protection from rising interest
rates. At December 31, 1996, approximately 93% of Fidelity's total loan
portfolio consisted of loans which mature or reprice within one year, compared
to approximately 94% at December 31, 1995 and 92% at December 31, 1994.
Fidelity has in recent periods been negatively impacted by the fact that
increases in the interest rates accruing on Fidelity's ARMs lagged the
increases in interest rates accruing on its deposits due to reporting delays
and contractual look-back periods contained in the Bank's loan documents. At
December 31, 1996, 93% of the Bank's loans, which are indexed to COFI at
December 31, 1996, as with all COFI portfolios in the industry, do not reprice
until some time after the industry liabilities composing COFI reprice. The
Company's liabilities reprice generally in line with the cost of funds of
institutions which comprise the FHLB Eleventh District. In the Company's case,
the lag between the repricing of its liabilities and its ARM loans indexed to
COFI is approximately four months. Thus, when rates rise sharply, as in early
1995 and the latter part of 1996, there will be upward pressure on rates paid
on deposit accounts and wholesale borrowings, and the Company's net interest
income will be adversely affected until the majority of its interest-earning
assets fully reprice. Conversely, in a falling interest rate environment, such
as the period between the latter part of 1995 and early 1996, net interest
income will be positively affected.
The Company utilizes various financial instruments in the normal course of
its business. By their nature all such instruments involve risk, and the
maximum potential loss may exceed the value at which such instruments are
carried. As is customary for these types of instruments, the Company usually
does not require collateral or other security from other parties to these
instruments. The Company manages its credit exposure to counterparties through
credit approvals, credit limits and other monitoring procedures. The Company's
Credit Policy Committee makes recommendations regarding counterparties and
credit limits which are subject to approval by the Board of Directors.
The Company may employ interest rate swaps, caps and floors in the
management of interest rate risk. An interest rate swap agreement is a
financial transaction where two counterparties agree to exchange different
streams of payments over time. An interest rate swap involves no exchange of
principal either at inception or upon maturity; rather, it involves the
periodic exchange of interest payments arising from an underlying notional
principal amount. Interest rate caps and floors generally involve the payment
of a one-time premium to a counterparty who, if interest rates rise or fall,
above or below a predetermined level, will make payments to the Company at an
agreed upon rate for the term of the agreement until such time as interest
rates fall below or rise above the cap or floor level.
59
<PAGE>
During the first quarter of 1995, the Bank terminated interest rate swap
agreements with a notional amount of $700 million, resulting in a deferred
gain of $1.2 million which was fully amortized in 1995. Also, during the
fourth quarter of 1995, the Bank terminated its remaining interest swap
agreements with a notional amount of $446.7 million and as a result recorded a
deferred loss of $3.2 million that is being amortized over the remaining life
of the original transactions. As part of its interest rate risk management
process, the Bank entered into these interest rate swap agreements in 1993 and
1994 with various reputable counterparties. These interest rate swap
agreements were intended to modify the repricing characteristics of specific
assets and liabilities. There were no outstanding interest rate swap
agreements at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company entered into a one-year
advisory agreement with an investment advisor, pursuant to which the advisor
will recommend investments, subject to prior approval and direction of the
Company, and execute investment purchases in accordance with the Company
investment strategy. Under this agreement, outstanding forward commitments to
purchase MBS to be announced ("TBA") ARMS totaled $12.5 million. Also
outstanding in relation to this managed portfolio at December 31, 1996, were
$21 million notional amount of interest rate caps which will mature in 2003
and $8 million notional amount of put options on treasury futures with an
exercise date in 1997.
The Company is also considering plans to purchase assets (loans and
securities) that may exceed $900 million in 1997. This plan, in general terms,
is based upon certain risk adjusted return and liquidity objectives and is
designed to increase the Company's securities and loan portfolios to enhance
the Company's earning capabilities. The proposed increase in earning assets
may be at a lower interest rate spread than the Company's assets are currently
yielding depending on available financing sources. Accordingly, if the plan is
implemented, the Company's interest rate spread may decline. In conjunction
with this plan, the Company continues its exploration of other asset
origination capabilities and customer base expansion. If such opportunities
are pursued, they may operate to limit the asset purchase strategy discussed
above to an amount significantly less than $900 million.
60
<PAGE>
The following table sets out the maturity and rate sensitivity of the
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31,
1996. "Gap," as reflected in the table, represents the estimated difference
between the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
repricing during future periods as adjusted for interest-rate swaps and other
financial instruments as applicable, and based on certain assumptions,
including those stated in the notes to the table.
MATURITY AND RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 MATURITY OF REPRICING
-------------------------------------------------------------------
WITHIN 3 4-12 1-5 6-10 OVER 10
MONTHS MONTHS YEARS YEARS YEARS TOTAL
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS:
Cash and cash
equivalents........... $ 37,879 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 37,879
Investment
securities(1) (2)..... 52,330 2,178 116,631 -- 42,620 213,759
Mortgage-backed
securities(1)......... 55,837 24,861 46,105 6,854 89,891 223,548
Loans receivable:
ARMs and other
adjustables(3)...... 2,293,207 274,027 103,829 4,250 112 2,675,425
Fixed rate loans..... 1,551 5,663 4,231 15,550 61,761 88,756
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total gross loans
receivable........ 2,294,758 279,690 108,060 19,800 61,873 2,764,181
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total interest-
earning assets... 2,440,804 306,729 270,796 26,654 194,384 3,239,367
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
INTEREST-BEARING
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Checking and savings
accounts(4)......... 339,089 -- -- -- -- 339,089
Money market
accounts(4)......... 67,892 -- -- -- -- 67,892
Fixed maturity
deposits:
Retail customers... 786,990 1,174,078 113,500 614 1,230 2,076,412
Wholesale
customers......... 1,911 2,238 8,391 -- -- 12,540
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total deposits.... 1,195,882 1,176,316 121,891 614 1,230 2,495,933
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Borrowings:
FHLB advances(3)..... 212,700 117,151 20,000 100,000 -- 449,851
Other................ -- 140,000 -- -- -- 140,000
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total borrowings... 212,700 257,151 20,000 100,000 -- 589,851
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total interest-
bearing
liabilities...... 1,408,582 1,433,467 141,891 100,614 1,230 $3,085,784
---------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- ==========
Repricing Gap........... $1,032,222 $(1,126,738) $128,905 $(73,960) $193,154
========== =========== ======== ======== ========
Gap to total assets..... 30.99% (33.83)% 3.87% (2.22)% 5.80%
========== =========== ======== ======== ========
Cumulative Gap to Total
Assets................. 30.99% (2.84)% 1.03% (1.19)% 4.61%
========== =========== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Repricings shown are based on the contractual maturity or repricing
frequency of the instrument.
(2) Investment securities include FHLB stock of $52.3 million.
(3) ARMs and variable rate borrowings from the FHLB system ("FHLB advances")
are primarily in the shorter categories as they are subject to interest
rate adjustments.
(4) These liabilities are subject to daily adjustments and are therefore
included in the "Within 3 Months" category.
Analysis of the Gap provides only a static view of the Company's interest
rate sensitivity at a specific point in time. The actual impact of interest
rate movements on the Company's net interest income may differ from that
implied by any Gap measurement. The actual impact on net interest income may
depend on the direction and magnitude of the interest rate movement, as well
as competitive and market pressures.
61
<PAGE>
ASSET QUALITY
General
The Company's loan portfolio is primarily secured by assets located in
Southern California and is comprised principally of single family and
multifamily (2 units or more) residential loans. At December 31, 1996, 18.7%
of Fidelity's real estate loan portfolio consisted of California single family
residences, while another 11.6% and 62.0% consisted of California multifamily
dwellings of 2 to 4 units and 5 or more units, respectively. At December 31,
1995, 19.6% of Fidelity's real estate loan portfolio (including loans held for
sale) consisted of California single family residences while another 11.4% and
61.0% consisted of California multifamily dwellings of 2 to 4 units and 5 or
more units, respectively.
The performance of the Company's loans secured by multifamily and commercial
properties has been adversely affected by Southern California economic
conditions. These portfolios are particularly susceptible to the potential for
further declines in the Southern California economy, such as increasing
vacancy rates, declining rents, increasing interest rates, declining debt
coverage ratios, and declining market values for multifamily and commercial
properties. In addition, the possibility that investors may abandon properties
or seek bankruptcy protection with respect to properties experiencing negative
cash flow, particularly where such properties are not cross-collateralized by
other performing assets, can also adversely affect the multifamily loan
portfolio. There can be no assurances that current improved economic
indicators will have a material impact on the Bank's portfolio in the near
future as many factors key to recovery may be impacted adversely by the
Federal Reserve Board's interest rate policy as well as other factors.
The Bank's internal asset review process reviews the quality and
recoverability of each of those assets which exhibit credit risk to the Bank
based on delinquency and other criteria in order to establish adequate GVA and
SVA. See Item 1. "Business--Credit Loss Experience."
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan
An important component of the Company's business strategy is the reduction
of risk in the Bank's loan and REO portfolios. In the fourth quarter of 1995,
the Bank adopted the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan, which was designed to
aggressively dispose of, resolve or otherwise manage a pool (the "AARP Pool")
of primarily multifamily loans and REO that at that time were considered by
the Bank to have higher risk of future nonperformance or impairment relative
to the remainder of the Bank's multifamily loan portfolio. The Accelerated
Asset Resolution Plan reflected both an acceleration in estimated timing of
asset resolution, as well as a potential change in recovery method from the
normal course of business.
The AARP Pool originally consisted of 411 assets with an aggregate gross
book balance of approximately $213.3 million, comprised of $137.0 million in
gross book balance of loans and $76.3 million in gross book balance of REO. In
an effort to maximize recovery on loans and REO included in the AARP Pool, the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan allowed for a range of possible methods of
resolution including, but not limited to, (i) individual loan restructuring,
potentially including additional extensions of credit or write-offs of
existing principal, (ii) foreclosure and sale of collateral properties, (iii)
securitization of loans, (iv) the bulk sale of loans and (v) bulk sale or
accelerated disposition of REO properties.
As a consequence of the adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan,
the Bank recorded a $45.0 million loan portfolio charge in the fourth quarter
of 1995, which was reflected as a credit to the Bank's allowance for estimated
loan and REO losses. This amount represented the estimated additional losses,
net of SVAs, anticipated to be incurred by the Bank in executing the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. Such additional losses represented, among
other things, estimated reduced recoveries from restructuring loans and the
acceptance of lower proceeds from the sale of individual REO and the estimated
incremental losses associated with recovery through possible bulk sales of
performing and nonperforming loans and REO.
62
<PAGE>
Through December 31, 1996, (i) $31.2 million in gross book balances of AARP
Pool loans had been resolved through either a negotiated sale or discounted
payoff, (ii) $7.4 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool loans were
collected through normal principal amortization or paid off through the normal
course without loss, (iii) $22.5 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool
loans had been modified or restructured and retained in the Bank's mortgage
portfolio, (iv) $8.0 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool loans were
removed from the AARP Pool upon management's determination that such assets no
longer met the risk profile for inclusion in the AARP Pool or that accelerated
resolution of such assets was no longer appropriate and (v) $90.5 million in
gross book balances of REO were sold ($37.9 million in gross book balances of
AARP Pool loans were taken through foreclosure and acquired as REO since the
inception of the AARP). As of December 31, 1996, the AARP Pool consisted of
123 assets with an aggregate gross book balance of $53.7 million, comprised
primarily of accruing and nonaccruing multifamily real estate loans totaling
approximately $30.0 million and REO properties totaling approximately $23.7
million, which are reported as real estate owned on the statement of financial
condition. Through December 31, 1996, of the $45.0 million of reserves
established in connection with the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan,
$20.4 million had been charged off and $16.5 million had been allocated to
SVAs or REO writedowns in connection with the Bank's estimate of recovery for
AARP Pool assets. The Bank anticipates that the remaining pool of AARP assets
will be resolved by year-end 1997.
Notwithstanding the actions taken by the Bank in implementing the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan, there can be no assurance that the AARP
Pool assets retained by the Bank will not result in additional losses. The
Bank's allowance for loan and REO losses and the SVAs established in
connection with such assets are ultimately subjective and inherently
uncertain. See "--Credit Loss Experience." There can be no assurance that
further additions to the Bank's allowance for loan and REO losses will not be
required in the future in connection with such assets, which could have an
adverse effect on the Bank's financial condition, results of operations and
levels of regulatory capital.
Classified Assets
Total classified assets decreased $45.0 million or 20.5% from December 31,
1995, to $174.1 million at December 31, 1996. This decrease was primarily due
to a decrease in performing classified loans during 1996 as a result of the
reclassification of certain loans in the fourth quarter of 1996. See
"Business--Credit Administration--Loan Grading System." The ratio of NPAs to
total assets decreased from 2.16% at December 31, 1995, to 1.83% at December
31, 1996. This decrease is primarily due to reduced levels of nonaccruing
loans ("NPLs") at December 31, 1996, compared to December 31, 1995. The Bank's
reclassification process has been reviewed by the OTS. Based on discussions
with the OTS, management does not anticipate any material exception to its
process as a result of their review.
63
<PAGE>
REO
All assets and ratios are reported net of specific reserves and writedowns
unless otherwise stated. The following table presents asset quality details at
the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995
------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
NPAs by type:
Nonaccruing loans............................... $ 36,125 $ 51,910
REO, net of REO GVA............................. 24,663 19,521
-------- --------
Total NPAs.................................... $ 60,788 $ 71,431
======== ========
NPAs by composition:
Single family residences........................ $ 11,204 $ 10,178
Multifamily 2 to 4 units........................ 9,369 9,269
Multifamily 5 units and over.................... 36,160 25,923
Commercial and other............................ 5,355 28,361 (1)
REO GVA......................................... (1,300) (2,300)
-------- --------
Total NPAs.................................... 60,788 71,431
Total TDRs........................................ 45,196 32,691
-------- --------
Total TDRs and NPAs........................... $105,984 $104,122
======== ========
Classified assets:
NPAs............................................ $ 60,788 $ 71,431
Performing classified loans..................... 111,248 (2) 147,646
Other classified assets......................... 2,060 --
-------- --------
Total classified assets....................... $174,096 $219,077
======== ========
Classified asset ratios:
Nonaccruing loans to total assets............... 1.08% 1.57%
NPAs to total assets............................ 1.83% 2.16%
TDRs to total assets............................ 1.36% 0.99%
NPAs and TDRs to total assets................... 3.18% 3.16%
Classified assets to total assets............... 5.23% 6.64%
REO to NPAs..................................... 40.57% 27.33%
Nonaccruing loans to NPAs....................... 59.43% 72.67%
</TABLE>
- -------
(1) Includes two loans on one hotel property with a total balance of $15.9
million at December 31, 1995.
(2) Includes a hotel property loan with a balance of $18.4 million at December
31, 1996.
Direct costs of foreclosed real estate operations totaled $5.7 million, $5.8
million and $8.7 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in both the number
and average gross book value of properties foreclosed. The following table
provides information about the change in the book value and the number of
properties owned and foreclosed for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT OR FOR
THE YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
---------------
1996 1995
------- -------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
REO net book value............................................. $24,663 $19,521
Increase in REO book value for the period...................... $ 5,142 $ 5,406
Number of real properties owned................................ 131 109
Increase in number of properties owned for the period.......... 22 45
Number of properties foreclosed for the period................. 226 270
Gross book value of properties foreclosed...................... $77,585 $92,661
Average gross book value of properties foreclosed.............. $ 343 $ 343
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE>
Allowance for Estimated Loan Losses
The following table summarizes the reserves, writedowns and certain coverage
ratios at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------
1996 1995
------- -------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Loans:
GVA........................................................ $25,308 $48,921
Specific reserves.......................................... 32,200 40,514
------- -------
Total allowance for estimated loan losses(1)(2).......... $57,508 $89,435
======= =======
Writedowns(3).............................................. $ 146 $ 316
======= =======
Total loan allowances and loan writedowns to gross
loans(4).................................................. 2.09% 2.96%
Total loan allowances to gross loans....................... 2.08% 2.95%
Loan GVA to loans(4)....................................... 0.93% 1.64%
Loan GVA to nonaccruing loans.............................. 70.06% 94.24%
Nonaccruing loans to total loans, net...................... 1.34% 1.77%
Real estate owned:
REO GVA.................................................... $ 1,300 $ 2,300
Specific reserves.......................................... 781 1,192
------- -------
Total REO allowance for estimated losses................. $ 2,081 $ 3,492
======= =======
Writedowns(3).............................................. $14,819 $17,584
======= =======
Total REO allowances and REO writedowns to gross REO....... 40.66% 51.92%
Total REO allowances to gross REO(5)....................... 7.78% 15.17%
REO GVA to REO(4).......................................... 5.01% 10.54%
Total loans and REO:
GVA........................................................ $26,608 $51,221
Specific reserves.......................................... 32,981 41,706
------- -------
Total allowance for estimated losses(2).................. $59,589 $92,927
======= =======
Writedowns(3).............................................. $14,965 $17,900
======= =======
Total allowances and writedowns to gross loans and REO..... 2.66% 3.60%
Total allowances to gross loans and REO(4)................. 2.14% 3.04%
Total GVA to loans and REO(4).............................. 0.97% 1.70%
Total GVA to NPAs.......................................... 42.86% 69.47%
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) All allowances for loan losses are for the Bank's portfolio of mortgage
loans.
(2) At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the allowance for estimated loan losses
includes $16.7 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of remaining loan
GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. See "--Asset
Quality--Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan."
(3) Writedowns include cumulative charge-offs on outstanding loans and REO as
of the dates indicated.
(4) Loans and REO, as applicable, in these ratios are calculated prior to
their reduction for loan and REO GVA, respectively, but are net of
specific reserves and writedowns.
(5) Net of writedowns.
65
<PAGE>
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowances for estimated
loan and real estate losses for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995(1)
------------------------------ ---------------------------------
REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE
LOANS OWNED TOTAL LOANS OWNED TOTAL
-------- ----------- -------- -------- ----------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance on January 1,... $ 89,435 $ 3,492 $ 92,927 $ 67,202 $ 2,318 $ 69,520
Provision for losses.. 15,610 3,219 18,829 69,724 (1) 3,366 73,090
Charge-offs........... (50,841) (4,630) (55,471) (44,278) (8,358) (52,636)
Allocations from GVA
to REO............... -- -- -- (6,166) 6,166 --
Recoveries.............. 3,304 -- 3,304 2,953 -- 2,953
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Balance on December 31,. $ 57,508 $ 2,081 $ 59,589 $ 89,435 $ 3,492 $ 92,927
======== ======= ======== ======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Included in the provision for estimated loan losses in 1995 is the $45
million loan portfolio charge associated with the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan.
The following table details the activity affecting specific loss reserves
for the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
------------------------------ ------------------------------
REAL ESTATE REAL ESTATE
LOANS OWNED TOTAL LOANS OWNED TOTAL
-------- ----------- -------- -------- ----------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance on January 1,... $ 40,514 $ 1,192 $ 41,706 $ 16,720 $ 2,318 $ 19,038
Allocations from GVA
to specific reserves. 42,527 4,219 46,746 68,072 7,232 75,304
Charge-offs........... (50,841) (4,630) (55,471) (44,278) (8,358) (52,636)
-------- ------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Balance on December 31,. $ 32,200 $ 781 $ 32,981 $ 40,514 $ 1,192 $ 41,706
======== ======= ======== ======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
NONINTEREST INCOME/EXPENSE
Noninterest income has three major components: (a) noninterest income from
ongoing operations, which includes loan fee income, gains or losses on loans
held for sale, fees earned on the sale of securities and annuities and retail
banking fees, (b) income/expenses associated with owned real estate, which
includes both the provision for real estate losses as well as income/expenses
incurred by the Company associated with the operations of its owned real
estate properties and (c) gains and losses on the sales of loan servicing,
investment securities and mortgage-backed securities. Items (b) and (c) can
fluctuate widely, and could therefore mask the underlying fee generating
performance of the Company on an ongoing basis.
Noninterest income decreased by $8.8 million from net noninterest income of
$11.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1995 to net noninterest income of
$2.3 million in the year ended December 31, 1996. The major components of this
decrease are: (a) other noninterest income (expense) decreased by $4.5 million
as a result of a net gain of $4.6 million realized in 1995 from the sale of
$495.5 million in rights to service loans for others, with no comparable
amounts in 1996; (b) loan servicing fees decreased by $1.3 million in the year
ended December 31, 1996 from the 1995 twelve month period primarily as a
result of the sale of the rights to service loans in the first quarter of 1995
and the second quarter of 1996; (c) net gains on sales of mortgage-backed
securities decreased during the year ended December 31, 1996 by $0.6 million
from the 1995 twelve month period; and (d) net gains on securities activities
in the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased by $2.2 million from the 1995
twelve month period. The increased sales activity in loans, MBSs and
investment securities in 1995 was primarily for regulatory capital maintenance
purposes.
66
<PAGE>
Noninterest income improved by $18.9 million from net noninterest expense of
$7.8 million in the year ended December 31, 1994 to net noninterest income of
$11.1 million in the year ended December 31, 1995. The major components of
this improvement are: (a) real estate provisions and costs decreased by $8.3
million in the year ended December 31, 1995, as a result of decreased average
levels of REO, (b) net gains on securities activities of $4.1 million in the
year ended December 31, 1995 improved from $1.1 million during the same period
in 1994 primarily as a result of the sales of securities for regulatory
capital maintenance purposes, (c) a net gain of $4.6 million was realized in
the year ended December 31, 1995 from the sale of rights to service loans for
others (no such sales were recorded during the same period of 1994), (d) net
gains on loan sales improved by $4.5 million to a gain of $0.5 million in the
year ended December 31, 1995 from a loss of $4.0 million during the same
period in 1994 (loan sale gains and losses during both periods were a
consequence of sales of loans to reduce the overall size of the Bank to
maintain minimum regulatory capital ratios) and (e) fee income from the sale
of uninsured investment products increased by $0.7 million from $3.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 1994 to $4.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 1995, reflecting the progress of the Bank's integrated sales
strategy and the consolidation of Gateway's operations since August 1994, when
it was purchased by the Bank from Citadel as part of the 1994 Restructuring
and Recapitalization. Prior to that time, Gateway was a wholly owned
subsidiary of Citadel and only a portion of its fee income was shared with the
Bank under a fee sharing arrangement.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses (excluding the SAIF special assessment of $18.0 million)
decreased by $17.5 million to $64.5 million for the year ended December 31,
1996 compared to $82.0 million for the year ended December 31, 1995. The
change was primarily due to (a) a $7.8 million decrease in personnel and
benefit expense due to a decline of 152 or 23.6% in the twelve month average
number of FTEs; (b) a decrease of $2.0 million in occupancy costs; (c) a
decrease of $1.3 million of FDIC insurance costs due to the recapitalization
of the SAIF in 1996 and an upgrade in the Bank's assessment classification,
excluding the SAIF special assessment of $18.0 million; (d) a decrease of $4.3
million resulting in provisions for capitalized software costs in 1995 with no
corresponding amount in 1996; and (e) a decrease of $2.7 million in office-
related expenses and other costs which was largely tied to the overall
reduction in personnel and overhead. These favorable variances were partially
offset by an increase of $0.6 million in professional services due largely to
cost reengineering efforts and outsourcing of certain administrative
functions.
The Company decreased total employee headcount during 1996 by 97 to achieve
organizational goals involving cost reductions, outsourcing opportunities and
changes in product focus. Areas which experienced employee reductions in 1996
included the Consumer Lending Group (a reduction of 56 employees), the Finance
Group (a reduction of 21 employees) and the Retail Financial Services Group,
other administrative services and subsidiaries (a reduction of 20 employees).
The Company may have limited staff reductions during 1997.
Operating expenses decreased by $9.9 million to $82.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 1995 compared to $91.9 million for the year ended December
31, 1994, excluding net 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization charges. The
change was primarily due to (a) a decrease of $9.5 million in personnel and
benefits due to a decline of 229 or 26.2% in the twelve-month average FTEs,
(b) a decrease of $1.4 million in occupancy and other office related costs
partially as a result of the reduction in FTEs, (c) a $1.1 million decrease in
FDIC insurance premiums partially due to a decrease in deposits as a result of
a branch sale, and (d) a $2.0 million decrease in office related costs
partially as a result of the reduction in FTEs and tighter cost controls.
These favorable changes were partially offset by a provision of $4.3 million
for computer software costs.
The Bank decreased total employee headcount during 1995 by 169 to achieve
organizational goals involving cost reductions, outsourcing opportunities and
changes in product focus. Areas which experienced employee reductions in 1995
included the Consumer Lending Group (a reduction of 41 employees), the Retail
Financial Services Group (a reduction of 79 employees) and other
administrative services and subsidiaries (a reduction of 49 employees).
67
<PAGE>
Net 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization charges in 1994 of $65.4 million
consisted of provisions for estimated losses on assets held for Bulk Sale of
$56.3 million and $14.1 million of other general and administrative expenses,
including legal and consulting expenses, partially offset by a branch sale
gain of $5.0 million.
Decreased operating expenses, excluding the SAIF special assessment of $18.0
million, resulted in a decrease in the annualized operating expense ratio (the
ratio of operating expenses to total average assets) to 1.94% for the year
ended December 31, 1996 from 2.28% for the same period in 1995,
notwithstanding the decrease in total average asset size of the Company (from
$3.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 1995 to $3.3 billion for the year
ended December 31, 1996).
The decrease in total average asset size of the Bank (from $4.1 billion for
1994 to $3.6 billion for 1995) resulted in an increase in the annual operating
expense ratio from 2.27% for 1994 to 2.28% for 1995, notwithstanding the
decreased operating expenses computed without the impact of the 1994
Restructuring and Recapitalization charges.
Due to the sensitivity of the operating expense ratio to changes in the size
of the balance sheet, management also looks at trends in the efficiency ratio
to assess the changing relationship between operating expenses and income. The
efficiency ratio measures the amount of cost expended by the Bank to generate
a given level of revenues in the normal course of business. It is computed by
dividing total operating expense by net interest income and noninterest
income, excluding infrequent items. A decrease in the efficiency ratio is
favorable in that it indicates that less expenses were incurred to generate a
given level of revenue.
The efficiency ratio improved between the year ended December 31, 1995 and
December 31, 1996 from 89.81% to 67.77%. This decrease was due to increased
net interest income and decreased operating expense (excluding the SAIF
special assessment of $18.0 million), for reasons described above, which were
partially offset by decreased net noninterest income (expense).
The efficiency ratio improved between the year ended December 31, 1994 and
December 31, 1995 from 97.58% to 89.81%. These favorable changes were due to
increased noninterest income and decreased operating expense, which were
partially offset by decreased net interest income.
While the Company intends to continue to control and, if possible, reduce
operating expenses, a portion of the expense savings experienced in prior
periods will be devoted to certain business initiatives described under Item
1. "Business--Business Strategy." The Company also intends to expend resources
as it evaluates and pursues earning asset acquisition opportunities.
Furthermore, management does not believe that additional significant personnel
reductions would be appropriate without significantly increasing operational
risks. Accordingly, the levels of annual operating expense reductions
experienced during the past two years should not be expected for future
periods.
INCOME TAXES
The Company's combined federal and state statutory tax rate is approximately
42.4% of earnings before income taxes. The effective tax rate of 10.4% on
losses before income taxes for 1996 reflects the federal tax benefit
attributable to the third quarter filing of a loss carryback claim under IRC
Section 172(f), as discussed in the following paragraph. The income tax
provision for 1995 reflects only the state minimum corporation taxes.
Various federal Form 1120Xs "Amended U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return"
were filed in 1996 for years 1986 through 1989, 1991, 1992 and 1994 to reflect
the 10-year loss carryback under IRC Section 172(f) for qualifying deductions
through August 4, 1994. These returns were filed with the Bank's former parent
company, Citadel. The amended returns, if accepted in total, would result in a
net refund of $19.4 million to Fidelity. IRC Section 172(f) is an area of the
tax law without significant legal precedent. There may be opposition by the
IRS as to Fidelity's ability to carryback such losses. Therefore, no
assurances can be made as to Fidelity's
68
<PAGE>
entitlement to such claim. Fidelity has recorded $1.1 million of tax benefit
with respect to these amended tax returns.
Through August 4, 1994, the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization date,
the Bank filed a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined
California franchise tax return with its former parent company, Citadel.
Fidelity and its subsidiaries filed a consolidated federal income tax return
and a combined California franchise tax return with the Bank as the common
parent corporation for the period of August 5, 1994 through December 31, 1994
and the 1995 calendar year. Effective for 1996 and subsequent calendar years,
Fidelity and its subsidiaries will file a consolidated federal income tax
return and a combined California franchise tax return with its new parent
company, Bank Plus.
Although Fidelity ceased to be a member of the Citadel consolidated group as
a result of the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization, Fidelity will remain
severally liable for the federal income tax of the Citadel consolidated group
for those tax years during which it was a member of the Citadel consolidated
group at any time. Citadel and Fidelity are parties to a tax disaffiliation
agreement governing certain tax matters. For additional information, see
"Related Party Transactions--Tax Sharing" at Note 16 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Effective for taxable years beginning after 1995, legislation enacted in
1996 has repealed for federal purposes the reserve method of accounting for
bad debts for thrift institutions. While thrifts qualifying as "small banks"
may continue to use the experience method, Fidelity, deemed a "large bank," is
required to use the specific charge off method. In addition, this enacted
legislation contains certain income recapture provisions which are discussed
below.
Thrift institutions deemed "large banks" are required to include into income
ratably over 6 years, beginning with the first taxable year beginning after
1995, the institution's "applicable excess reserves." The applicable excess
reserves are the excess of (1) the balance of the institution's reserves for
losses on loans other than supplemental reserves at the close of its last
taxable year beginning before January 1, 1996, over (2) the adjusted balance
of such reserves as of the close of its last taxable year beginning before
January 1, 1988. Fidelity's applicable excess reserves at December 31, 1995
are $14.6 million. This amount will be recognized into taxable income over six
years at the rate of $2.4 million per year starting with the taxable year
ended December 31, 1996.
The adjusted pre-1988 total reserve balance of $35.2 million as of December
31, 1995, will be recaptured into taxable income in the event Fidelity (1)
ceases to be a "bank" or "thrift," or (2) makes distributions to shareholders
in excess of post-1951 earnings and profits, redemptions, or liquidations.
Based on current estimates, Fidelity has no post-1951 earnings and profits at
December 31, 1996. As a result, Fidelity's 1996 $3.0 million dividend
distribution to Bank Plus and $6.2 million distribution with respect to its
preferred stock will trigger reserve recapture into taxable income for 1996.
Based on current estimates, there is no current period income tax impact.
For federal income tax purposes, the maximum rate of tax applicable to
savings institutions is currently 35% for taxable income over $10 million. For
California franchise tax purposes, savings institutions are taxed as
"financial corporations" at a higher rate than that applicable to nonfinancial
corporations because of exemptions from certain state and local taxes. The
California franchise tax rate applicable to financial corporations is
approximately 11%.
The Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") has completed its examination
of the Bank's federal income tax returns through 1991. The Service will start
their examination of the federal income tax returns for 1992, 1993 and tax
year ended August 4, 1994 in early 1997. The California Franchise Tax Board
(the "FTB") has completed its examination of the California franchise tax
returns through 1988. Although the FTB has completed the field examination of
the California franchise tax returns for years 1989 through 1991, a final
audit report has not been received. For additional information regarding the
federal income and California franchise taxes payable by the Bank, see Note 11
to the consolidated financial statements.
69
<PAGE>
IRC Sections 382 and 383 and the Treasury Regulations thereunder generally
provide that, following an ownership change of a corporation with a net
operating loss (an "NOL"), a net unrealized built-in loss or tax credit
carryovers, the amount of annual post-ownership change taxable income that can
be offset by pre-ownership change NOLs or recognized built-in losses, and the
amount of post-ownership change tax liability that can be offset by pre-
ownership change tax credits, generally cannot exceed a limitation prescribed
by Section 382. The Section 382 annual limitation generally equals the product
of the fair market value of the equity of the corporation immediately before
the ownership change (subject to various adjustments) and the long-term tax-
exempt rate prescribed monthly by the Service.
As a result of the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization, the Bank
underwent an ownership change, ceased to be a member of the Citadel
consolidated group, and became subject to the annual limitations under IRC
Section 382. As a result of the 1995 Recapitalization, the Bank again
underwent an ownership change, and became subject to the annual limitations
under IRC Section 382. The limitations imposed by the 1995 change of ownership
are inclusive of the limitations imposed by the 1994 change of ownership.
At December 31, 1996, the Bank had an estimated NOL carryover for federal
income tax purposes of $114.8 million, of which $19.1 million is subject to
annual utilization limitations as a result of the 1994 change of ownership and
expires by year 2008, $20.1 million expires by year 2009, $54.7 million
expires by year 2010 (of which $32.5 million of the 1995 NOL and all of the
pre-1995 NOLs are subject to annual and aggregate utilization limitations as a
result of the 1995 change of ownership), and $20.9 million expires by year
2011, if not utilized. For California franchise tax purposes, there was an
estimated NOL carryover of $36.5 million, of which $5.0 million expires by
year 1997 and $0.9 million expires by year 1998 (both of which are subject to
annual utilization limitations as a result of the 1994 change of ownership),
$15.8 million expires by year 1999, $6.0 million expires by year 2000 (of
which $3.2 million of the 1995 NOL and all of the pre-1995 NOLs are subject to
annual and aggregate utilization limitations as a result of the 1995 change of
ownership), and $8.8 million expires by year 2001, if not utilized. The
deferred tax assets related to these NOLs have been recorded with a
corresponding valuation allowance in an equal amount under SFAS No. 109.
REGULATORY CAPITAL COMPLIANCE
FDICIA required the OTS to implement a system providing for regulatory
sanctions against institutions that are not adequately capitalized. The
severity of these sanctions increases to the extent that an institution's
capital continues to decline. Under FDICIA, the OTS issued the PCA Regulations
which established specific capital ratios for five separate capital categories
as set forth below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CORE
CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED
TOTAL
ASSETS CORE CAPITAL TO
(LEVERAGE RISK-WEIGHTED TOTAL CAPITAL TO
RATIO) ASSETS RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS
----------- --------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Well capitalized.............. 5% or above 6% or above 10% or above
Adequately capitalized........ 4% or above 4% or above 8% or above
Undercapitalized.............. Under 4% Under 4% Under 8%
Significantly
undercapitalized............. Under 3% Under 3% Under 6%
Critically undercapitalized... Ratio of tangible equity to adjusted total
assets of 2% or less
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996 the Bank was considered well capitalized. See Item 1
"Business--Regulation and Supervision--Fidelity--Capital Requirements and
Capital Categories."
70
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the capital ratios required by FDICIA for an
institution to be considered well capitalized and Fidelity's regulatory
capital at December 31, 1996 as compared to such ratios.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CORE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL
(TIER 1) TO (TIER 1) TO TOTAL CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED RISK-WEIGHTED RISK-WEIGHTED
TOTAL ASSETS ASSETS ASSETS
--------------- ---------------- ----------------
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fidelity's regulatory
capital................ $ 209,200 6.29% $ 209,200 10.61% $ 233,600 11.85%
Well capitalized
requirement............ 166,300 5.00 118,300 6.00 197,100 10.00
---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital.......... $ 42,900 1.29% $ 90,900 4.61% $ 36,500 1.85%
========== ==== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(1)...... $3,325,400 $1,970,900 $1,970,900
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of core capital
requirements, and refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in
12 C.F.R. section 567.1(bb) for purposes of risk-based capital
requirements.
FDICIA also required the OTS and the federal bank regulatory agencies to
revise their risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards take
adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk, and
risks of nontraditional activities. Effective January 1, 1994, the OTS
incorporated an interest rate risk component into its regulatory capital rule.
Under the revised rule, savings institutions with "above-normal" interest rate
risk exposure would be subject to a deduction from total capital for purposes
of calculating their risk-based capital requirements. See Item 1. "Business--
Regulation and Supervision--Fidelity--Capital Requirements and Capital
Categories." No interest rate risk component would have been required to be
added to the Bank's risk-based capital requirement at December 31, 1996 or
1995 had the rule been in effect on such dates.
The Bank is also subject to OTS capital regulations under FIRREA. These
regulations require Fidelity to maintain: (a) tangible capital of at least
1.5% of adjusted total assets (as defined in the regulations), (b) core
capital of at least 3% of adjusted total assets (as defined in the
regulations) and (c) total capital of at least 8.0% of risk-weighted assets
(as defined in the regulations). See Item 1. "Business--Regulation and
Supervision--Fidelity--Capital Requirements and Capital Categories."
71
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes the regulatory capital requirements under
FIRREA for Fidelity at December 31, 1996. As indicated in the table,
Fidelity's capital levels at December 31, 1996 exceeded all three of the
currently applicable minimum FIRREA capital requirements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TANGIBLE RISK-BASED
CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL CAPITAL
---------------- ---------------- -----------------
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
---------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stockholders' equity(1). $ 210,300 $ 210,300 $ 210,300
Unrealized loss on
securities............. (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
Adjustments:
Intangible assets..... (300) -- --
Nonincludable
subsidiaries......... (100) (100) (100)
GVA................... -- -- 24,600
Equity investments.... -- -- (200)
---------- ---------- ----------
Regulatory capital(2)... 208,900 6.28% 209,200 6.29% 233,600 11.85%
Required minimum........ 49,900 1.50 99,800 3.00 157,700 8.00
---------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -----
Excess capital.......... $ 159,000 4.78% $ 109,400 3.29% $ 75,900 3.85%
========== ==== ========== ==== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(3)...... $3,325,100 $3,325,400 $1,970,900
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Fidelity's total stockholders' equity, in accordance with GAAP, was 6.32%
of its total assets at December 31, 1996.
(2) Both the OTS and the FDIC may examine the Bank as part of their legally
prescribed oversight of the industry. Based on their examinations, the
regulators can direct that the Bank's financial statements be adjusted in
accordance with their findings.
(3) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of tangible and core
capital requirements, and refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1 (bb) for purposes of risk-based capital
requirements.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Bank derives funds from deposits, FHLB advances, securities sold under
agreements to repurchase, and other short-term and long-term borrowings. In
addition, funds are generated from loan payments and payoffs as well as from
the sale of loans and investments.
Sales and Securitization of Loans:
During 1996, no loans were securitized compared to $112.8 million of single
family adjustable rate mortgages that the Bank securitized during 1995 through
a swap of whole loans for MBS. See "--Sales of Securities" below. During 1996,
no loans were sold from the loans held for sale portfolio compared to
$1.3 million during 1995. Net proceeds from loan sales and Bulk Sales totaled
$621.4 million in the year ended December 31, 1994. Loan sales, Bulk Sales and
securitizations in 1995 and 1994 were completed for the purpose of downsizing
the Bank's assets to maintain regulatory capital ratios. During the third and
fourth quarters of 1994, the Bank sold performing and nonperforming loans in
the Bulk Sales with a gross book value of $341.4 million. Sales of loans are
dependent upon various factors, including volume of loans originated, interest
rate movements, investor demand for loan products, deposit flows, the
availability and attractiveness of other sources of funds, loan demand by
borrowers, desired asset size and evolving capital and liquidity requirements.
Due to the volatility and unpredictability of these factors, the volume of
Fidelity's sales of loans has fluctuated significantly and no estimate of
future sales can be made at this time. At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the Bank
had no loans held for sale. Sales of loans, if any, from the held for
investment portfolio would be caused by unusual events.
72
<PAGE>
FHLB Advances:
The Company had net increases in FHLB advances of $157.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 1996. This compares to net repayments of $40.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 1995, and net advances of $6.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 1994.
Commercial Paper:
Commercial paper outstanding was reduced by $10 million and $350 million for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively. During
1996, the Bank decreased its commercial paper line of credit commitment to
$150 million, a decrease of $350 million from December 31, 1995. Commercial
paper provided $96.0 million of net funds for the year ended December 31,
1994.
Loan Payments and Payoffs:
Loan principal payments, including prepayments and payoffs, provided $248.5
million, $194.1 million and $240.4 million for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The Company expects that loan payments and
prepayments will remain a significant funding source.
Sales of Securities:
The sale of investment securities and MBS provided $154.9 million, $264.4
million and $156.1 million for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994, respectively. The Bank held $335.7 million, $126.0 million and $70.2
million of investment securities and MBS in its available for sale portfolio
as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Sale of Common and Preferred Stock:
In the fourth quarter of 1995, Fidelity completed the 1995 Recapitalization
of the Bank, pursuant to which Fidelity raised approximately $134.4 million in
net new equity through the sale of 2,070,000 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock and 11,750,000 shares of Class A Common Stock. In August 1994, the Bank
received $109 million in net new equity from the issuance and sale of common
stock in connection with the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization.
Undrawn Sources:
The Company maintains other sources of liquidity to draw upon, which at
December 31, 1996 include (a) unused commercial paper facility capacity of
$110.0 million, (b) a line of credit with the FHLB with $255.2 million
available (assuming all of the $150 million commercial paper capacity is
used), (c) $233.3 million in unpledged securities available to be placed in
reverse repurchase agreements or sold and (d) $621.7 million of unpledged
loans, some of which would be available to collateralize additional FHLB or
private borrowings, or be securitized.
73
<PAGE>
Deposits:
At December 31, 1996, the Company had deposits of $2.5 billion, down from
the December 31, 1995 balance of $2.6 billion. The following table presents
the distribution of deposit accounts at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995
---------------- ----------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Money market accounts..... $ 65,605 2.6% $ 93,901 3.6%
Checking accounts......... 287,711 11.5 309,065 11.8
Passbook accounts......... 53,665 2.2 62,934 2.4
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total transaction
accounts............... 406,981 16.3 465,900 17.8
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Certificates of deposit
$100,000 and over......... 543,336 21.8 528,320 20.3
Certificates of deposit
less than $100,000........ 1,545,616 61.9 1,606,649 61.9
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total certificates of
deposit................ 2,088,952 83.7 2,134,969 82.2
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total deposits.......... $2,495,933 100.0% $2,600,869 100.0%
========== ===== ========== =====
</TABLE>
The Company is currently eligible to accept brokered deposits; however,
there were no brokered deposits outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements:
From time to time the Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements by
which it sells securities with an agreement to repurchase the same securities
at a specific future date (overnight to one year). The Company deals only with
dealers who are recognized as primary dealers in U.S. Treasury securities by
the Federal Reserve Board or perceived by management to be financially strong.
There were no reverse repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994. In the year ended December 31, 1996, the Company borrowed and
repaid funds from reverse repurchase agreements of $73.0 million. During 1995,
the Bank had net repayments of reverse repurchase agreements of $46.5 million.
During 1994, the Bank had net repayments of reverse repurchase agreements of
$3.8 million.
Loan Fundings:
Fidelity funded, either directly or through purchases, $13.9 million of
gross loans (excluding Fidelity's refinancings) in the year ended December 31,
1996 compared to $19.1 million in the same period of 1995 and $509.2 million
in the same 1994 period. The closing of the Company's wholesale and
correspondent lending operations in the fourth quarter of 1994 resulted in
reduced loan fundings in 1995 and a significant decrease in loan fundings
during the year ended December 31, 1996.
Contingent or Potential Uses of Funds:
The Bank had no unfunded loans at December 31, 1996 and 1995, compared to
$2.8 million at December 31, 1994.
Liquidity:
The OTS regulations require the maintenance of an average daily balance of
liquid assets of at least 5% of the average daily balance of the net
withdrawable accounts and short term borrowings (the "regulatory liquidity
ratio"). The Bank's monthly average regulatory liquidity ratio was 6.86%,
6.85% and 5.48% for December 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
74
<PAGE>
Holding Company Liquidity:
The terms of the Series A Preferred Stock issued by Fidelity pursuant to the
1995 Recapitalization provide for the making of an exchange offer by Bank Plus
of its 12% Senior Notes due 2007 ("Senior Notes") for the Series A Preferred
Stock. Bank Plus is contemplating commencing such an exchange offer in 1997.
The offering of Senior Notes in exchange for the Series A Preferred Stock will
only be made, if at all, by means of a prospectus.
At December 31, 1996, Bank Plus had cash and cash equivalents of $0.8
million and no material potential cash producing operations or assets other
than its investments in Fidelity and Gateway. Accordingly, Bank Plus is
substantially dependent on dividends from Fidelity and Gateway in order to
fund its cash needs, including its payment obligations with respect to any
such Senior Notes. Both Gateway's and Fidelity's ability to pay dividends or
otherwise provide funds to Bank Plus are subject to significant regulatory
restrictions. See Item 1. "Business--Regulation and Supervision--Fidelity--
Activities Regulation Not Related to Capital Compliance" and "--Regulation of
Fidelity Affiliates."
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
As of January 1, 1995, the Bank adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 122, "Accounting for Mortgage Servicing Rights." SFAS
No. 122 amends certain provisions of SFAS No. 65, "Accounting for Certain
Mortgage Banking Activities," to require recognition of the rights to service
mortgage loans for others as separate assets, however those rights are
acquired, eliminating the accounting distinction between rights to service
mortgage loans for others that are acquired through loan origination
activities and those acquired through purchase transactions. SFAS No. 122 also
requires that capitalized mortgage servicing assets be assessed for impairment
based on the fair value of those rights. As a consequence of the adoption of
SFAS No. 122, gains on sales of loans for the year ended December 31, 1995
increased by $0.7 million and the Bank's loss per share decreased by $0.02
(before the impact of the Reverse Stock Split).
The Bank maintains a stock option plan for the benefit of its executives. In
1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 123
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," which encourages companies to
account for stock-based compensation awards at their fair values at the date
the awards are granted. This statement does not require the application of the
fair value method and allows that continuance of the current accounting
method, which requires accounting for stock-based compensation awards at their
intrinsic value, if any, as of the grant date.
The accounting and disclosure requirements of this statement are effective
for financial statements at various dates beginning after December 15, 1995.
The Bank has elected not to adopt the fair value accounting provisions of this
statement. If the Bank had adopted this statement, the compensation expense
recorded for 1996 would have increased by approximately $0.9 million.
In June 1996, SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," was issued. The
accounting and reporting standards under this statement are based on
consistent application of a "financial-components approach" that focuses on
control. Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity
recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities
it has incurred, derecognizes financial assets when control has been
surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when extinguished. This statement
provides standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are
sales from transfers that are secured borrowings. This statement is effective
for transactions that take place after December 31, 1996. Pursuant to SFAS No.
127, the effective date for certain types of transactions, for which
compliance by January 1, 1997 would be extremely difficult due to the
accounting and information systems changes required, has been deferred to
January 1, 1998. The Company does not anticipate that this statement will have
a material impact on its operations.
75
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
ANNUAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT............................................. F-2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition........................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations.................................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.......................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.................................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................... F-8
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bank Plus Corporation
Los Angeles, California
We have audited the consolidated statements of financial condition of Bank
Plus Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Bank Plus
Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 7, 1997
F-2
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents............................. $ 70,126 $ 94,794
Due from brokers...................................... 31,614 --
Investment securities available for sale, at fair
value................................................ 156,251 94,305
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized
cost (market value of $5,198 at December 31, 1996)... 5,178 --
Mortgage-backed securities held for trading........... 14,121 --
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair
value................................................ 179,403 31,733
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity, at
amortized cost (market value of $27,169 at December
31, 1996)............................................ 30,024 --
Loans receivable, net of allowances of $57,508 and
$89,435 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.. 2,691,931 2,935,116
Interest receivable................................... 20,201 20,162
Investment in FHLB stock.............................. 52,330 49,425
Real estate owned, net................................ 24,663 19,521
Premises and equipment, net........................... 31,372 34,333
Other assets.......................................... 23,076 20,055
---------- ----------
$3,330,290 $3,299,444
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Liabilities:
Deposits............................................ $2,495,933 $2,600,869
FHLB advances....................................... 449,851 292,700
Commercial paper.................................... 40,000 50,000
Mortgage-backed notes............................... 100,000 100,000
Other liabilities................................... 31,099 26,832
---------- ----------
3,116,883 3,070,401
---------- ----------
Commitments and contingencies
Minority Interest: Preferred stock of consolidated
subsidiary........................................... 51,750 --
Stockholders' equity:
Serial preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000
shares authorized; 2,070,000 shares outstanding;
liquidation preference $25 per share............... -- 51,750
Common stock:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 78,500,000
shares authorized; 18,245,265 shares outstanding
at December 31, 1996............................. 182 --
Class A Common stock, par value $.01 per share;
78,500,000 shares authorized; 18,242,465 shares
outstanding at December 31, 1995................. -- 182
Paid-in capital..................................... 261,902 262,151
Unrealized gains on securities...................... 1,043 788
Accumulated deficit................................. (101,470) (85,828)
---------- ----------
161,657 229,043
---------- ----------
$3,330,290 $3,299,444
========== ==========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans...................................... $ 213,013 $ 227,710 $ 226,949
Mortgage-backed securities................. 5,772 3,535 2,868
Investment securities and other............ 19,128 15,232 11,648
---------- --------- ---------
Total interest income.................... 237,913 246,477 241,465
---------- --------- ---------
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits................................... 120,265 128,242 108,310
FHLB advances.............................. 16,161 17,411 17,663
Other borrowings........................... 16,197 29,183 25,526
Subordinated notes......................... -- -- 4,329
---------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense................... 152,623 174,836 155,828
---------- --------- ---------
NET INTEREST INCOME.......................... 85,290 71,641 85,637
Provision for estimated loan losses........ 15,610 69,724 65,559
---------- --------- ---------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR
ESTIMATED LOAN LOSSES....................... 69,680 1,917 20,078
---------- --------- ---------
NONINTEREST INCOME (EXPENSE):
Loan fee income............................ 2,295 3,606 4,518
Gains (losses) on loans sales, net......... 22 522 (3,963)
Fee income from sale of uninsured
investment products....................... 4,456 4,117 3,419
Fee income on deposits and other income.... 3,044 3,260 4,522
Gains on securities and trading activities,
net....................................... 1,336 4,098 1,130
Gains on sales of servicing................ -- 4,604 --
---------- --------- ---------
11,153 20,207 9,626
---------- --------- ---------
Provision for estimated real estate losses. (3,219) (3,366) (8,768)
Direct costs of real estate operations,
net....................................... (5,688) (5,779) (8,651)
---------- --------- ---------
(8,907) (9,145) (17,419)
---------- --------- ---------
Total noninterest income (expense)....... 2,246 11,062 (7,793)
---------- --------- ---------
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Personnel and benefits..................... 27,022 34,859 44,368
Occupancy.................................. 10,353 12,337 13,707
FDIC insurance............................. 6,936 8,205 9,340
Professional services...................... 11,156 10,601 10,208
Office-related expenses.................... 3,552 4,611 6,647
Capitalized software charge................ -- 4,297 --
Other...................................... 5,432 7,044 7,589
---------- --------- ---------
64,451 81,954 91,859
SAIF special assessment.................... 18,000 -- --
1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization
charges, net.............................. -- -- 65,394
---------- --------- ---------
Total operating expense.................. 82,451 81,954 157,253
---------- --------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY
INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY...................... (10,525) (68,975) (144,968)
Income tax (benefit) expense............... (1,093) 4 (16,524)
---------- --------- ---------
LOSS BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARY.. (9,432) (68,979) (128,444)
Minority interest in subsidiary (dividends
on subsidiary preferred stock)............ 4,657 -- --
---------- --------- ---------
NET LOSS..................................... (14,089) (68,979) (128,444)
Preferred stock dividends.................. 1,553 -- --
---------- --------- ---------
LOSS AVAILABLE FOR COMMON STOCKHOLDERS....... $ (15,642) $ (68,979) $(128,444)
========== ========= =========
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE........................ $ (0.86) $ (8.84) $ (39.08)
========== ========= =========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING... 18,242,887 7,807,201 3,286,960
========== ========= =========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLASS A CLASS B CLASS C
COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK(1) COMMON STOCK(1) COMMON STOCK PREFERRED STOCK
----------------- ------------------- ------------------ ------------------ -------------------- PAID IN
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL
---------- ------ ----------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- ------ ---------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January
1, 1994......... -- $-- 1 $ -- -- $-- -- $-- -- $ -- $ 70,689
Issuance of
Class A and B
common stock(1). -- -- 19,860,473 199 4,202,243 42 -- -- -- -- 99,211
Issuance of
Class C common
stock........... -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,907,143 19 -- -- 9,531
Unrealized loss
on securities
available for
sale............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Minimum pension
liability
adjustment...... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Net loss for
1994............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---- ----------- ----- ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -------- --------
Balance,
December 31,
1994(1)......... -- -- 19,860,474 199 4,202,243 42 1,907,143 19 -- -- 179,431
Reclass Class B
Stock to Class A
Stock........... -- -- 4,202,243 42 (4,202,243) (42) -- -- -- -- --
Reclass Class C
Stock to Class A
Stock........... -- -- 1,907,143 19 -- -- (1,907,143) (19) -- -- --
Issuance of
Class A
Stock(2)........ -- -- 47,000,000 470 -- -- -- -- 2,070,000 51,750 82,172
Unrealized gain
on securities
available for
sale............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Minimum pension
liability
adjustment...... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Effect of one-
for-four Reverse
Stock Split(3).. -- -- (54,727,395) (548) -- -- -- -- -- -- 548
Net loss for
1995............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---- ----------- ----- ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -------- --------
Balance,
December 31,
1995............ -- -- 18,242,465 182 -- -- -- -- 2,070,000 51,750 262,151
Unrealized gain
on securities
available for
sale............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Cash dividends
on preferred
stock........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Exercise of
stock options... -- -- 2,800 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23
Holding company
re-organization
and
capitalization(4). 18,245,265 182 (18,245,265) (182) -- -- -- -- (2,070,000) (51,750) (272)
Net loss for
1996............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
---------- ---- ----------- ----- ---------- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- -------- --------
Balance,
December 31,
1996............ 18,245,265 $182 -- $ -- -- $-- -- $-- -- $ -- $261,902
========== ==== =========== ===== ========== ==== ========== ==== ========== ======== ========
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED MINIMUM RETAINED
GAIN (LOSS) PENSION EARNINGS/ TOTAL
ON LIABILITY (ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
SECURITIES ADJUSTMENT DEFICIT) EQUITY
----------- ---------- ------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, January
1, 1994......... $ -- $ -- $ 111,595 $ 182,284
Issuance of
Class A and B
common stock(1). -- -- -- 99,452
Issuance of
Class C common
stock........... -- -- -- 9,550
Unrealized loss
on securities
available for
sale............ (3,482) -- -- (3,482)
Minimum pension
liability
adjustment...... -- (2,813) -- (2,813)
Net loss for
1994............ -- -- (128,444) (128,444)
----------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Balance,
December 31,
1994(1)......... (3,482) (2,813) (16,849) 156,547
Reclass Class B
Stock to Class A
Stock........... -- -- -- --
Reclass Class C
Stock to Class A
Stock........... -- -- -- --
Issuance of
Class A
Stock(2)........ -- -- -- 134,392
Unrealized gain
on securities
available for
sale............ 4,270 -- -- 4,270
Minimum pension
liability
adjustment...... -- 2,813 -- 2,813
Effect of one-
for-four Reverse
Stock Split(3).. -- -- -- --
Net loss for
1995............ -- -- (68,979) (68,979)
----------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Balance,
December 31,
1995............ 788 -- (85,828) 229,043
Unrealized gain
on securities
available for
sale............ 255 -- -- 255
Cash dividends
on preferred
stock........... -- -- (1,553) (1,553)
Exercise of
stock options... -- -- -- 23
Holding company
re-organization
and
capitalization(4). -- -- -- (52,022)
Net loss for
1996............ -- -- (14,089) (14,089)
----------- ---------- ------------ -------------
Balance,
December 31,
1996............ $ 1,043 $ -- $(101,470) $ 161,657
=========== ========== ============ =============
</TABLE>
- ----
(1) The one share of common stock owned by Citadel Holding Corporation
("Citadel") prior to August 4, 1994 is included in Class A common stock
for purposes of this statement until it was converted to 1,050,000 shares
of Class B common stock on August 4, 1994.
(2) During 1995, Fidelity issued and sold to investors in a public offering
2,070,000 shares of preferred stock for $51.8 million and 47,000,000
shares of Class A Common Stock for $82.7 million.
(3) Common Stock share data has been retroactively adjusted for the one-for-
four reverse stock split approved by stockholders on February 9, 1996.
(4) In May 1996, Fidelity completed a holding company reorganization pursuant
to which all of the outstanding Common Stock of Fidelity was converted on
a one-for-one basis into all the outstanding Common Stock of Bank Plus,
the holding company. In addition, the Preferred Stock of the Bank was
reclassed from stockholders equity to minority interests.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss...................................... $ (14,089) $(68,979) $(128,444)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provisions for estimated loan and real
estate losses.............................. 18,829 73,090 74,327
Provisions for capitalized software charge.. -- 4,297 --
Provisions for bulk sale losses............. -- -- 56,296
Gain on sale of branches.................... -- -- (5,048)
Capitalized loan origination costs.......... (103) (58) (411)
(Losses) gains on sale of loans and
securities................................. (1,358) (4,620) 2,833
FHLB stock dividends........................ (3,072) (2,438) (2,376)
Depreciation and amortization............... 3,834 5,587 6,561
Amortization of deferred loan items, net.... (2,049) (2,790) (2,616)
Deferred income tax benefit................. -- -- (14,789)
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities
("MBS") held for trading..................... (38,972) -- --
Principal repayments of MBS held for trading.. 62 -- --
Proceeds from sales of MBS held for trading... 24,971 -- --
Origination of loans held for sale............ -- -- (105,867)
Purchases of loans held for sale.............. -- -- (91,534)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale.... -- 1,290 280,486
Interest receivable (increase) decrease....... (39) 94 2,793
Other assets (increase) decrease.............. (34,383) (1,092) 44,187
Interest payable increase (decrease).......... 1,280 8,017 (6,970)
Other liabilities and deferred income increase
(decrease)................................... 2,554 (400) 1,304
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities............................... (42,535) 11,998 110,732
--------- -------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of investment securities available
for sale..................................... (201,313) (45,569) (43,972)
Maturities of investment securities available
for sale..................................... 42,950 22,286 2,686
Proceeds from sales of investment securities
available for sale........................... 89,479 102,061 18,988
Purchase of investment securities held to
maturity..................................... -- (25,001) (34,083)
Maturities of investment securities held to
maturity..................................... 2,286 10,000 --
Purchases of MBS available for sale........... (206,089) (27,858) (61,780)
Principal repayments of MBS available for
sale......................................... 4,655 7,952 12,954
Proceeds from sales of MBS available for sale. 40,490 162,365 137,102
Purchase of MBS held to maturity.............. (15,869) (16,234) --
Principal repayments of MBS held to maturity.. 1,397 3,408 --
Proceeds from bulk sales, net................. -- -- 340,963
Loans receivable, net decrease (increase)..... 184,768 131,608 (56,815)
Redemption of FHLB and FRB stock.............. -- -- 7,510
Proceeds from sales of real estate, net....... 35,544 34,063 18,300
Purchase of Gateway Investment Services, net
of cash acquired............................. -- -- 523
Premises and equipment (additions)
dispositions, net............................ (844) 1,661 (3,024)
--------- -------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities............................... (22,546) 360,742 339,352
--------- -------- ---------
</TABLE>
(Continued on following page)
F-6
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS--(CONTINUED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Demand deposits and passbook savings, net
decrease.................................... $(125,589) $ (66,670) $(197,040)
Certificate accounts, net increase
(decrease).................................. 20,653 (29,733) (138,205)
Payment for deposits included in branch sale,
net......................................... -- -- (331,099)
Payment of preferred stock dividend.......... (1,553) -- --
Proceeds from FHLB advances.................. 349,008 80,000 570,000
Repayments of FHLB advances.................. (191,857) (120,000) (563,700)
Repayment of subordinated notes.............. -- -- (60,000)
Short-term borrowing (decrease) increase..... (10,000) (350,000) 92,170
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock, net. -- 134,392 109,002
Bank Plus capitalization costs............... (272) -- --
Stock options exercised...................... 23 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.............................. 40,413 (352,011) (518,872)
--------- --------- ---------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents...................... (24,668) 20,729 (68,788)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period.................................. 94,794 74,065 142,853
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period.................................. $ 70,126 $ 94,794 $ 74,065
========= ========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash (paid) received during the period for:
Interest on deposits, advances and other
borrowings................................ $(149,067) $(166,239) $(164,412)
Income taxes............................... 257 5,837 40,927
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to real estate acquired through
foreclosure................................. 48,663 51,872 74,214
Loans originated to finance sale of real
estate owned................................ 4,758 9,037 13,151
Loans originated to finance bulk sale of real
estate owned to Citadel..................... -- 5,339 13,930
Transfers from held to maturity portfolio to
available for sale portfolio:
Loans receivable........................... -- 68,995 85,301
Investment securities...................... -- 141,678 --
MBS........................................ -- 16,404 --
Transfers from available for sale portfolio
to held to maturity portfolio:
Loans receivable........................... -- -- 246,885
Investment securities...................... 7,378 -- 96,942
MBS........................................ 15,552 3,603 --
Mortgage loans exchanged for MBS............. -- 112,840 44,453
In-substance foreclosures transferred to
loans, net.................................. -- -- 28,362
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
NOTE 1--SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bank Plus
Corporation ("Bank Plus") and subsidiaries. Bank Plus is the holding company
of Fidelity Federal Bank, a Federal Savings Bank and its subsidiaries (the
"Bank" or "Fidelity") and Gateway Investment Services, Inc. ("Gateway").
Unless otherwise indicated, references to the "Company" include Bank Plus,
Fidelity, Gateway, and all subsidiaries of Bank Plus and Fidelity. Bank Plus'
headquarters are in Los Angeles, California. The Company offers a broad range
of consumer financial services, including demand and term deposits, uninsured
investment products, and loans to consumers, through 33 full-service branches,
all of which are located in Southern California, principally in Los Angeles
and Orange counties. All significant intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years'
consolidated financial statements to conform to the 1996 presentation.
In May 1996, the Bank completed a reorganization pursuant to which all of
the outstanding Class A Common Stock of Fidelity was converted on a one-for-
one basis into all of the outstanding common stock of Bank Plus and Bank Plus
became the holding company for Fidelity (the "Reorganization"). Bank Plus
currently has no significant business or operations other than serving as the
holding company for Fidelity and Gateway, which prior to the Reorganization
was a subsidiary of the Bank. All references to "Fidelity" prior to the
Reorganization include Gateway.
On February 9, 1996, the Bank's stockholders approved a one-for-four reverse
stock split (the "Reverse Stock Split") of the issued and outstanding shares
of the Bank's Common Stock. Upon effectiveness of the Reverse Stock Split,
each stockholder became the owner of one share of Common Stock for each four
shares of Common Stock held at the time of the Reverse Stock Split and became
entitled to receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares. All per share data
and weighted average common shares outstanding have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
In the fourth quarter of 1995, Fidelity completed a plan of recapitalization
(the "1995 Recapitalization"), pursuant to which Fidelity raised approximately
$134.4 million in net new equity through the sale of 2,070,000 shares of 12%
Noncumulative Exchangeable Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A ("Series A
Preferred Stock"), and 47,000,000 shares of Fidelity Class A Common Stock. As
of December 31, 1996, the Series A Preferred Stock of the Bank is presented on
the Company's Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as "Minority
interest: preferred stock of consolidated subsidiary" and the dividends on
such preferred stock subsequent to the date of the Reorganization are
reflected in the Company's earnings as "Minority interest in subsidiary."
As part of the 1995 Recapitalization, Fidelity adopted the accelerated asset
resolution plan (the "Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan"), which was designed
to aggressively dispose of, resolve, or otherwise manage a pool of primarily
multifamily mortgage loans and real estate owned ("REO"). As a result,
Fidelity recorded a $45.0 million loan portfolio charge in the allowance for
estimated loan losses which represents the estimated additional losses
expected to be incurred in connection with the Accelerated Asset Resolution
Plan. See Note 4 for a further description and status of the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan.
On August 4, 1994, Fidelity and its former sole stockholder, Citadel Holding
Corporation ("Citadel"), completed major aspects of a plan of restructuring
and recapitalization (the "1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization"), pursuant
to which Fidelity raised approximately $109 million in net new equity, and
Citadel's
F-8
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
ownership interest in Fidelity was reduced to 16.2% of the then outstanding
common stock. Citadel's ownership interest was reclassified into 4,202,243
shares of Class B Common Stock. All share and per share amounts have been
restated to retroactively reflect the reclassification of Citadel's ownership
interest in Fidelity.
In April 1995, Citadel transferred an aggregate of 4,195,000 shares of its
Class B Common Stock to various third parties, retaining 7,243 shares. As a
result of these transfers, all of the outstanding Class B Common Stock was
reclassified into Class A Common Stock in accordance with the stockholders'
agreement entered into as a part of the 1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash
on hand, amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal
funds are sold for one-day periods. There were $29.0 million of federal funds
outstanding at December 31, 1996 and none at December 31, 1995. Fidelity is
required by the Federal Reserve System to maintain noninterest-earning cash
reserves based upon the outstanding balances in certain of its transaction
accounts. At December 31, 1996, the required reserves, including vault cash,
totaled $4.9 million.
Investment Securities and Mortgage-backed Securities
The Company's investment in securities principally consists of U.S. treasury
and agency securities and mortgage-backed securities ("MBSs"). The Bank
classifies its investment in securities as held to maturity securities,
trading securities and available for sale securities as applicable. Held to
maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, while trading and available
for sale securities are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on
trade securities are reflected currently in earnings, and on available for
sale securities are reflected as a separate component in stockholder's equity,
net of tax effect. Income on securities is recognized using the level yield
method and gains or losses on sales are recorded on a specific identification
basis.
Loans
Loans are considered impaired when it is deemed probable by management the
Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due
according to the contracted terms of the loan agreement. The Company may
measure impairment by discounting expected future cash flows at the loan's
effective interest rate, or by reference to an observable market price, or by
determining the fair value of the collateral for a collateral dependent asset.
Regardless of the measurement method, the Company will measure impairment
based on the fair value of the collateral when it is determined that
foreclosure is probable.
Interest on loans, including impaired loans, is credited to income as earned
and is accrued only if deemed collectible, using the interest method. Unpaid
interest income is reversed when a loan becomes over 90 days contractually
delinquent and on other loans, if management determines it is warranted, prior
to being 90 days delinquent. While a loan is on nonaccrual status, interest is
recognized only as cash is received. Discounts and premiums on purchased loans
are classified with loans receivable on the statement of financial condition
and are credited or charged to operations over the estimated life of the
related loans using the interest method. The Company charges fees for
originating loans. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct costs of
originating the loan, are recognized as an adjustment of the loan yield over
the estimated life of the loan by the interest method. When a loan is sold,
unamortized net loan origination fees and direct costs are recognized in
earnings with the related gain or loss on sale. Other loan fees and charges
representing service costs for the prepayment of loans, for delinquent
payments or for miscellaneous loan services are recognized when collected.
Loan commitment fees received are deferred to the extent they exceed direct
underwriting costs.
F-9
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Company may designate certain of its loans receivable as being held for
sale. In determining the level of loans held for sale, the Company considers
whether loans (a) would be sold as part of its asset/liability management
strategy, or (b) may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes
in prepayment risk, the need to increase regulatory capital or other similar
factors. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or
market value. The market value calculation includes consideration of
commitments and related fees. Adjustments to the lower of cost or market are
charged to current operations and are included in net gains/losses on loan
sales in the statement of operations.
The Bank has securitized and sold certain loans and provided investors with
credit enhancements to absorb losses through either subordination of the
Bank's retained percentage or the pledging of cash and securities. The Bank
estimates losses to be incurred from the credit enhancements by considering
all the underlying loans in the securitizations in determining its allowance
for loan losses or through the establishment of a contingent liability based
on the historical loss experience of the loan pools. Any estimated losses are
reflected in current operations in the form of provisions for loan losses.
As of January 1, 1995, the Bank adopted SFAS No. 122, "Accounting for
Mortgage Servicing Rights." SFAS No. 122 amends certain provisions of SFAS No.
65, "Accounting for Certain Mortgage Banking Activities," to require
recognition of the rights to service mortgage loans for others as separate
assets, however those rights are acquired, eliminating the accounting
distinction between rights to service mortgage loans for others that are
acquired through loan origination activities and those acquired through
purchase transactions. SFAS No. 122 also requires that capitalized mortgage
servicing assets be assessed for impairment based on the fair value of those
rights. As a consequence of the adoption of SFAS No. 122, gains on sales of
loans for the year ended December 31, 1995 increased by $0.7 million and the
Bank's loss per share decreased by $0.08.
Real Estate Owned
Real estate held for sale acquired in settlement of loans results when
property collateralizing a loan is foreclosed upon or otherwise acquired by
the Company in satisfaction of the loan. Real estate acquired through
foreclosure is recorded at the lower of fair value or the recorded investment
in the loan satisfied at the date of foreclosure. Fair value is based on the
net amount that the Company could reasonably expect to receive for the asset
in a current sale between a willing buyer and a willing seller, that is, other
than in a forced or liquidation sale. Inherent in the computation of estimated
fair value are assumptions about the length of time the Company may have to
hold the property before disposition. The holding costs through the expected
date of sale and estimated disposition costs are included in the valuations.
Adjustments to the carrying value of the assets are made through valuation
allowances and charge-offs, recognized through a charge to operations.
Allowances for Estimated Losses on Loans and Real Estate Owned
The Company estimates allowances for estimated losses on loans and REO which
represents the Company's estimate of identified and unidentified losses in the
Company's portfolios. These estimates, while based upon historical loss
experience and other relevant data, are ultimately subjective and inherently
uncertain. The Company has established valuation allowances for estimated
losses on specific loans and REO ("specific valuation allowances" or "SVA")
and for the inherent risk in the loan and REO portfolios which has yet to be
specifically identified ("general valuation allowances" or "GVA"). Specific
valuation allowances are allocated from the GVA when, in the Company's
judgment, a loan is impaired or REO has declined in value and the loss is
probable and estimable. When these estimated losses are determined to be
permanent, such as when a loan is foreclosed and the related property is
transferred to REO, specific valuation allowances are charged off.
The Company establishes the level of GVA utilizing several models and
methodologies which are based upon a number of factors, including historical
loss experience, the level of non-performing and internally classified loans,
the composition of the loan portfolio, estimated remaining lives of the
various types of loans
F-10
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
within the portfolio, prevailing and forecasted economic conditions and
management's judgment. Additions to GVA, in the form of provisions, are
reflected in current operations.
Loan Servicing
Fidelity services mortgage loans for investors. Fees earned for servicing
loans owned by investors are reported as income when the related loan payments
are collected. Loan servicing costs are charged back to expense as incurred.
Stock-based Compensation
SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation," became effective in
1996. The statement encourages, but does not require companies to record
compensation cost for stock based employee compensation plans at fair value.
The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation
using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related
Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured
as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company's stock at
the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the
stock. As required by SFAS No. 123, the Company has disclosed the pro forma
effects of the fair value method in Note 15.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization are computed principally on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the
useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
Supplementary Loss/Earnings per Share Data
Net loss per common share for 1996, as adjusted to reflect the dividends on
preferred stock of subsidiary, was determined based on 18,242,887 shares
outstanding. Common stock equivalents were antidilutive for the year ended
December 31, 1996, and therefore are not included in the computation of net
loss per share.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided to reflect deferred tax assets or liabilities on
the balance sheet based upon the tax effects of differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial
statements.
Through August 4, 1994, the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization date,
the Bank filed a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined
California franchise tax return with its former parent company, Citadel.
Fidelity and its subsidiaries filed a consolidated federal income tax return
and a combined California franchise tax return with the Bank as the common
parent corporation for the period of August 5, 1994 through December 31, 1994
and the 1995 calendar year. Effective for 1996 and subsequent calendar years,
Fidelity and its subsidiaries will file a consolidated federal income tax
return and a combined California franchise tax return with its new parent
company, Bank Plus.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company utilizes various financial instruments in the normal course of
its business. By their nature all such instruments involve risk, and the
maximum potential loss may exceed the value at which such instruments are
carried. As is customary for these types of instruments, the Company is
required to pledge collateral or other security to other parties to these
instruments. The Company controls its credit exposure to counterparties
through credit approvals, credit limits and other monitoring procedures. The
amount of credit exposure for such instruments at any given time is
represented by the fair value of instruments having a positive value.
The Company has employed interest rate swaps, caps, floors and commitments
for forward sale of securities in the management of interest rate risk.
Additionally, the Company has engaged in certain option activities as
F-11
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
part of its investment strategies which involve the purchase and sale of
options on U.S. Government securities. Interest rate swaps generally involve
the exchange of fixed or floating interest payments without the exchange of
the underlying principal amounts. Interest rate caps and floors generally
involve the payment of a one time premium to a counterparty who, if interest
rates rise or fall above or below a predetermined level, will make payments to
the Company at an agreed upon rate for the term of the agreement until such
time as interest rates fall below or rise above the cap or floor level.
Option positions or other instruments entered into for trading or yield
enhancement purposes are carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized
changes in fair values are recognized in earnings in the period in which the
changes occur. For interest rate swaps, caps or floors entered into for
purposes of modifying the interest rate characteristic of interest-earning
assets or interest-bearing liabilities, amounts receivable or payable under
such contracts are recognized as interest income or expense, depending upon
the assets or liabilities to which they are matched. Gains or losses on early
terminations of swaps are included in the carrying amount of the related asset
or liability and amortized as yield adjustments over the remaining terms of
the terminated instruments. The premiums paid for interest rate caps and
floors are capitalized and amortized over the life of the contracts using the
straight line method. For derivative instruments used to hedge the
fluctuations in fair values of trading or available for sale securities, such
derivative instruments are carried at fair value, with realized and unrealized
changes in fair value recognized in a manner consistent with the
classification of the security being hedged.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1996, SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities" was issued. The
accounting and reporting standards for this statement are based on consistent
application of a "financial-components approach" that focuses on control.
Under that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, an entity
recognizes the financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities
it has incurred, derecognizes financial assets when control has been
surrendered, and derecognizes liabilities when extinguished. This statement
provided standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are
sales from transfers that are secured borrowings.
This Statement is effective for transfers and servicing of financial assets
and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after December 31, 1996 and is to
be applied prospectively. Pursuant to SFAS No. 127, the effective date for
certain types of transactions, for which compliance by January 1, 1997 would
be extremely difficult due to the accounting and information systems changes
required, has been deferred to January 1, 1998. Earlier or retroactive
adoption is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this statement
will have a material impact on its operations.
As of January 1, 1995, the Bank adopted SFAS 121: "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,"
which establishes accounting standards for the impairment of long-lived
assets, certain identifiable intangibles, and goodwill related to those assets
to be held and used and for long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles to be disposed of. This Statement requires that long-lived assets
and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's results of
operations.
F-12
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 2--INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The following table summarizes investment securities and MBS available for
sale portfolio.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
AMORTIZED ---------------------- AGGREGATE
COST GAINS LOSSES NET FAIR VALUE
--------- ------ ------ ------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
DECEMBER 31, 1996
Available for sale:
Investment securities:
U.S. Treasury and agency
securities(1)................. $155,353 $1,298 $(400) $ 898 $156,251
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
MBS:
FHLMC.......................... 61,469 903 (10) 893 62,362
FNMA........................... 54,624 946 (22) 924 55,548
GNMA........................... 35,703 110 (133) (23) 35,680
Participation certificates..... 25,813 -- -- -- 25,813
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
177,609 1,959 (165) 1,794 179,403
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
Total available for sale..... $332,962 $3,257 $(565) 2,692 $335,654
======== ====== ===== ========
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities included
in amortized cost(1)............ (2,009)
Net unrealized and realized
gains, hedging activities(3).... 360
-------
Net unrealized gains included
in stockholders' equity..... $ 1,043
=======
DECEMBER 31, 1995
Available for sale:
Investment securities:
U.S. Treasury and agency
securities(1)................. $ 84,200 $2,984 $ -- $ 2,984 $ 87,184
Other investments(2)........... 7,099 52 (30) 22 7,121
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
91,299 3,036 (30) 3,006 94,305
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
MBS:
FHLMC.......................... 3,068 -- (30) (30) 3,038
FNMA........................... 55 36 -- 36 91
Participation certificates..... 28,123 481 -- 481 28,604
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
31,246 517 (30) 487 31,733
-------- ------ ----- ------- --------
Total available for sale..... $122,545 $3,553 $ (60) 3,493 $126,038
======== ====== ===== ========
Net unrealized losses on
investment securities included
in amortized cost(1)............ (3,366)
Net unrealized and realized
gains, hedging activities(3).... 661
-------
Net unrealized losses
included in stockholders'
equity...................... $ 788
=======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Amortized cost of certain securities that were previously transferred
between portfolios includes unamortized market value adjustments recorded
at the time of transfer to the held to maturity portfolio.
(2) Represents U.S. Treasury securities which have been pledged as credit
support to a securitization of loans by the Company.
(3) Includes realized gains of $0.3 and $0.7 in 1996 and 1995, respectively,
from hedging activities which are amortized over the lives of the hedged
securities as required by SFAS No. 115.
F-13
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the investment securities and MBS held to
maturity portfolios.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED
AMORTIZED ---------------------- AGGREGATE
COST GAINS LOSSES NET FAIR VALUE
--------- ----- ------- ------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
DECEMBER 31, 1996
Held to maturity:
Investment securities:
Other investments(1)(2)........ $ 5,178 $20 $ -- $ 20 $ 5,198
------- --- ------- ------- -------
MBS:
Non-agency..................... 30,024 -- (2,855) (2,855) 27,169
------- --- ------- ------- -------
Total held to maturity....... $35,202 $20 $(2,855) $(2,835) $32,367
======= === ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Amortized cost of certain securities that were previously transferred
between portfolios includes unamortized market value adjustments recorded
at the time of transfer to the held to maturity portfolio.
(2) Represents U.S. Treasury securities which have been pledged as credit
support to a securitization of loans by the Company.
There were no investment securities and MBS classified as held to maturity
or trading at December 31, 1995.
During the fourth quarter of 1994, the Bank reevaluated its investment
strategy and transferred $96.9 million of investment securities from its
available for sale portfolio to its held to maturity portfolio, at fair value.
Additionally, at the end of the first quarter of 1995, the Bank transferred
$3.6 million of MBS from its available for sale portfolio to its held to
maturity portfolio, at fair value.
As a consequence of concerns regarding the Bank's ability to maintain
minimum regulatory capital levels to remain adequately capitalized, the Bank
reclassified all held to maturity investment securities and MBS to its
available for sale portfolio in the second quarter of 1995. Subsequent to
their reclassification, certain available for sale securities were sold. In
the third quarter of 1996, the Company identified $15.6 million of MBS and
$7.4 million of investment securities for which it had the ability and intent
to hold to maturity, and transferred them from its available for sale
portfolio to its held to maturity portfolio, at fair value.
The following table summarizes the weighted average yield of debt securities
as of the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------
1996 1995
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
Investment securities:
Available for sale...................................... 6.20% 4.70%
Held to maturity........................................ 5.77 --
MBS:
Available for sale...................................... 7.51 6.85
Held to maturity........................................ 7.52 --
Held for trading........................................ 6.54 --
</TABLE>
F-14
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The following table presents the available for sale and held to maturity
portfolios at December 31, 1996 by contractual maturity. Actual maturities on
MBS may differ from contractual maturities due to scheduled periodic payments
and prepayments.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNREALIZED AGGREGATE
AMORTIZED -------------- FAIR
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
--------- ------ ------- ---------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
Investment Securities:
Over 1 year to 5 years.................... $112,778 $1,228 $ (375) $113,631
Over 10 years............................. 42,575 70 (25) 42,620
-------- ------ ------- --------
155,353 1,298 (400) 156,251
-------- ------ ------- --------
MBS:
Over 5 years to 10 years.................. 6,715 139 -- 6,854
Over 10 years............................. 170,894 1,820 (165) 172,549
-------- ------ ------- --------
177,609 1,959 (165) 179,403
-------- ------ ------- --------
Total Available for Sale................. $332,962 $3,257 $ (565) $335,654
======== ====== ======= ========
HELD TO MATURITY:
Investment Securities:
Within 1 year............................. $ 2,178 $ 5 $ -- $ 2,183
Over 1 year to 5 years.................... 3,000 15 -- 3,015
-------- ------ ------- --------
5,178 20 -- 5,198
-------- ------ ------- --------
MBS:
Over 10 years............................. 30,024 -- (2,855) 27,169
-------- ------ ------- --------
Total Held to Maturity................... $ 35,202 $ 20 $(2,855) $ 32,367
======== ====== ======= ========
</TABLE>
The following gains and losses were realized from the sale of investment
securities and MBS, the costs of which were computed on a specific
identification method, during the periods indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
SALES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES AND MBS:
Available for sale........................ $ 129,969 $264,426 $156,090
Held for trading.......................... 24,971 -- --
--------- -------- --------
$ 154,940 $264,426 $156,090
========= ======== ========
GAINS (LOSSES) ON SECURITIES AND TRADING
ACTIVITIES, NET:
Gains (losses) on sales of securities
available for sale:
Gains................................... $ 1,215 $ 3,903 $ 260
Losses.................................. (59) (566) (1,799)
--------- -------- --------
1,156 3,337 (1,539)
--------- -------- --------
Gains (losses) on trading activities:
Realized gains, net..................... 187 761 2,669
Unrealized losses, net.................. (7) -- --
--------- -------- --------
180 761 2,669
--------- -------- --------
Gains on securities and trading
activities, net.......................... $ 1,336 $ 4,098 $ 1,130
========= ======== ========
</TABLE>
F-15
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
At December 31, 1996 and 1995, interest receivable in the accompanying
statements of financial condition include accrued interest receivable on debt
securities of $3.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
NOTE 3--DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
During 1996, the Company recognized net losses from futures option
activities of $0.1 million, compared to net gains in 1995 and 1994 of $0.8
million and $2.1 million respectively. No futures contracts were outstanding
at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
During the third quarter of 1996, the Company entered into a one-year
advisory agreement with an investment advisor, pursuant to which the advisor
will recommend investments, subject to prior approval and direction of the
Company, and execute investment activities in accordance with the Company's
investment strategy. Under this agreement, the investment advisor utilizes
financial instruments to manage the risks and returns of the program,
including options, caps and forward commitments of MBS to be announced
("TBA"). All investment and other financial instrument activity relating to
the investment advisor's account are treated as trading activities.
The following trading instruments were outstanding at December 31, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MATURITY/ AVERAGE FAIR VALUE AT
NOTIONAL EXERCISE FAIR DECEMBER 31, UNREALIZED
INSTRUMENT AMOUNT DATE VALUE 1996 LOSS
---------- -------- --------- ------- ------------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Interest Rate Cap....... $21,000 2003 $790 $718 $(171)
Put option on Treasury
Futures................ 8,000 1997 15 33 (18)
Commitments to purchase
MBS TBA................ 12,500 1997 (2) (4) (4)
</TABLE>
Also included as a hedge to the available for sale investment portfolio is a
commitment to sell MBS TBA adjustable rate mortgages ("ARMs") of $20.4
million, with an average fair value of $0.03 million and an unrealized gain of
$0.03 million at December 31, 1996.
F-16
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 4--LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate loans:
Single family................................. $ 517,288 $ 594,019
Multifamily:
2 to 4 units................................ 319,281 345,884
5 to 36 units............................... 1,408,317 1,521,056
37 units and over........................... 307,741 329,916
---------- ----------
Total multifamily......................... 2,035,339 2,196,856
Commercial and industrial..................... 203,510 234,384
Land.......................................... 1,670 3,032
---------- ----------
Total real estate loans................... 2,757,807 3,028,291
Other........................................... 6,373 6,040
---------- ----------
2,764,180 3,034,331
---------- ----------
Less:
Unearned discounts............................ 1,974 2,463
Deferred loan fees............................ 12,767 7,317
Allowance for estimated losses................ 57,508(1) 89,435(1)
---------- ----------
72,249 99,215
---------- ----------
$2,691,931 $2,935,116
========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) At December 31, 1996 and 1995, the allowance for estimated loan losses
includes $16.7 million and $36.7 million, respectively, of remaining loan
GVA and SVA for the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan.
During the fourth quarter of 1994, the Bank sold $45.0 million of
outstanding balances of home equity lines of credit and recorded a gain of
$1.2 million. In December 1995, the Bank sold the remaining outstanding
balances of the home equity lines of credit of $6.4 million and recorded a
loss of $0.1 million. There were no outstanding balances of home equity lines
of credit at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Fidelity's portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for others amounted to
$433.8 million at December 31, 1996 and $600.3 million at December 31, 1995.
The Bank sold the servicing rights to substantially all of the single family
and 2-4 unit loans in the Bank's loan portfolio during the second quarter of
1996. The servicing rights to $938.5 million in loans were transferred for a
total sale price of $10.0 million. Such sales proceeds have been accounted for
as a reduction in the carrying value of the loans based on the relative fair
values of the servicing sold and loans retained and is to be accreted over the
estimated life of the loans. Accretion of this amount of the deferred revenue
totaled $1.5 million during 1996.
Fidelity's loan portfolio includes multifamily, commercial and industrial
loans of $2.2 billion at December 31, 1996 and $2.4 billion at December 31,
1995 which depend primarily on operating income to provide debt service
coverage. These loans generally have a greater risk of default than single
family residential loans and, accordingly, earn a higher rate of interest to
compensate in part for the risk. Approximately 99% of these loans are secured
by property within the state of California.
F-17
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Company has modified the terms of a number of its loans that it would not
otherwise consider to protect its investment by granting concessions to
borrowers because of borrowers' financial difficulties. These modifications
take several forms, including interest only payments for a limited time at
current rates, a reduced loan balance in exchange for a payment of the loan or
other terms that the Bank deems appropriate in the circumstances.
Modifications are granted when the collateral is inadequate or the borrower
does not have the ability or willingness to continue making scheduled payments
and management determines that the modification is the best alternative for
the collection of its investment. Modifications are reported as Troubled Debt
Restructurings ("TDRs") as defined by SFAS No. 15, "Accounting by Debtors and
Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings," and accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 15 and SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of
a Loan." At December 31, 1996 and 1995, outstanding TDRs totaled $45.2 million
and $32.7 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, interest income of
$3.6 million, $3.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, was recorded on
TDRs. During 1996, 1995 and 1994 the reduction in interest income had the
loans performed according to their original terms was immaterial.
The total of loans on nonaccrual status was $36.1 million, $51.9 million and
$71.6 million at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The reduction
in income related to these loans upon which interest was not paid was $6.0
million, $5.8 million and $10.9 million for the corresponding years.
In the fourth quarter of 1995, the Bank adopted the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan, which was designed to aggressively dispose of, resolve or
otherwise manage a pool (the "AARP Pool") of primarily multifamily loans and
REO that at that time were considered by the Bank to have higher risk of
future nonperformance or impairment relative to the remainder of the Bank's
multifamily loan portfolio. The Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan reflected
both an acceleration in estimated timing of asset resolution, as well as a
potential change in recovery method from the normal course of business.
The AARP Pool originally consisted of 411 assets with an aggregate gross
book balance of approximately $213.3 million, comprised of $137.0 million in
gross book balance of loans and $76.3 million in gross book balance of REO. In
an effort to maximize recovery on loans and REO included in the AARP Pool, the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan allowed for a range of possible methods of
resolution including, but not limited to, (i) individual loan restructuring,
potentially including additional extensions of credit or write-offs of
existing principal, (ii) foreclosure and sale of collateral properties, (iii)
securitization of loans, (iv) the bulk sale of loans and (v) bulk sale or
accelerated disposition of REO properties.
As a consequence of the adoption of the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan,
the Bank recorded a $45.0 million loan portfolio charge in the fourth quarter
of 1995, which was reflected as a credit to the Bank's allowance for estimated
loan and REO losses. This amount represented the estimated additional losses,
net of SVAs, anticipated to be incurred by the Bank in executing the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan. Such additional losses represented, among
other things, estimated reduced recoveries from restructuring loans and the
acceptance of lower proceeds from the sale of individual REO and the estimated
incremental losses associated with recovery through possible bulk sales of
performing and nonperforming loans and REO.
Through December 31, 1996, (i) $31.2 million in gross book balances of AARP
Pool loans had been resolved through either a negotiated sale or discounted
payoff, (ii) $7.4 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool loans were
collected through normal principal amortization or paid off through the normal
course without loss, (iii) $22.5 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool
loans had been modified or restructured and retained in the Bank's mortgage
portfolio, (iv) $8.0 million in gross book balances of AARP Pool loans were
removed form the AARP Pool upon management's determination that such assets no
longer met the risk profile for inclusion in the AARP Pool or that accelerated
resolution of such assets was no longer appropriate and
F-18
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
(v) $90.5 million in gross book balances of REO were sold ($37.9 million in
gross book balances of AARP Pool loans were taken through foreclosure and
acquired as REO since the inception of the AARP). As of December 31, 1996, the
AARP Pool consisted of 123 assets with an aggregate gross book balance of
$53.7 million, comprised primarily of accruing and nonaccruing multifamily
real estate loans totaling approximately $30.0 million and REO properties
totaling approximately $23.7 million, which are reported as real estate owned
on the statement of financial condition. Through December 31, 1996, of the
$45.0 million of reserves established in connection with the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan, $20.4 million had been charged off and $16.5 million had been
allocated to SVAs or REO writedowns in connection with the Bank's estimate of
recovery for AARP Pool assets. The Bank anticipates that the remaining pool of
AARP assets will be resolved by year-end 1997.
Notwithstanding the actions taken by the Bank in implementing the
Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan, there can be no assurance that the AARP
Pool assets retained by the Bank will not result in additional losses. The
Bank's allowance for loan and REO losses and the SVAs established in
connection with such assets are ultimately subjective and inherently
uncertain. There can be no assurance that further additions to the Bank's
allowance for loan and REO losses will not be required in the future in
connection with such assets, which could have an adverse effect on the Bank's
financial condition, results of operations and levels of regulatory capital.
NOTE 5--REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate owned consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate acquired through foreclosure........ $ 26,744 $ 23,013
Allowance for estimated losses.................. (2,081) (3,492)
----------- -----------
$24,663 $ 19,521
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The following summarizes the results of real estate owned operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Loss) income from:
Real estate acquired for investment or
development.................................. $ -- $ -- $ 95
Real estate acquired through foreclosure...... (5,688) (5,779) (8,746)
Provision for estimated real estate losses.... (3,219) (3,366) (8,768)
------- ------- --------
Net loss from real estate operations........ $(8,907) $(9,145) $(17,419)
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
F-19
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 6--ALLOWANCE FOR ESTIMATED LOAN AND REAL ESTATE OWNED LOSSES
The following summarizes the activity in the allowances for estimated loan
and real estate losses:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REAL ESTATE
LOANS OWNED TOTAL
-------- ----------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1994................ $ 83,832 $ 17,715 $101,547
Provision for losses.................... 65,559 8,768 74,327
Charge-offs............................. (55,685) (16,820) (72,505)
GVA charged off on bulk sale assets..... (30,497) (7,894) (38,391)
Recoveries and other.................... 3,993 549 4,542
-------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1994.............. 67,202 2,318 69,520
Provision for losses.................... 69,724 (1) 3,366 73,090
Charge-offs............................. (44,278) (8,358) (52,636)
Allocations from GVA to REO............. (6,166) 6,166 --
Recoveries and other.................... 2,953 -- 2,953
-------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1995.............. 89,435 3,492 92,927
Provision for losses.................... 15,610 3,219 18,829
Charge-offs............................. (50,841) (4,630) (55,471)
Recoveries and other.................... 3,304 -- 3,304
-------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1996.............. $ 57,508 $ 2,081 $ 59,589
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Included in the provision for estimated loan losses for 1995 is the $45
million loan portfolio charge associated with the Accelerated Asset
Resolution Plan.
At December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the gross recorded investment in
loans that are considered to be impaired was $153.5 million, and $149.3
million, respectively. Included in these amounts are $105.1 million and $117.2
million of impaired loans for which allowance for credit losses have been
established totaling $30.3 million and $39.1 million. The average recorded
investment and the amount of interest income recognized on impaired loans
during 1996 and 1995 was $151.4 million and $148.7 million and $9.4 million
and $7.8 million, respectively.
The performance of the Company's loan portfolio has been adversely affected
by Southern California economic conditions. The performance of the Company's
multifamily loan portfolio is particularly susceptible to further declines in
the Southern California economy, increasing vacancy rates, declining rents,
increasing interest rates, declining debt coverage ratios, declining market
values for multifamily residential properties, and the possibility that
investors may abandon properties or seek bankruptcy protection with respect to
properties experiencing negative cash flow, particularly where such properties
are not cross-collateralized by other performing assets. There can be no
assurances that these economic conditions will improve in the near future as
many factors key to recovery may be impacted adversely by the Federal Reserve
Bank's interest rate policy as well as other factors. Consequently, rents and
real estate values may not stabilize which may affect future delinquency and
foreclosure levels and may adversely impact the Company's asset quality,
earnings performance and capital levels.
F-20
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 7--DEPOSITS
Deposits consist of the following balances at the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1996 1995
----------------- -----------------
AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
---------- ----- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
TYPE OF ACCOUNT, WEIGHTED AVERAGE
INTEREST RATE:
Passbook, 2.00% at December 31, 1996
and 1995............................ $ 53,665 2.2% $ 62,934 2.4%
Checking and money market checking,
1.10% at December 31, 1996 and 1.01%
at December 31, 1995................ 287,711 11.5 309,065 11.8
Money market savings, 4.14% at
December 31, 1996 and 3.05% at
December 31, 1995................... 65,605 2.6 93,901 3.6
---------- ----- ---------- -----
406,981 16.3 465,900 17.8
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Certificates with rates of:
Under 3.00%........................ 4,640 0.2 6,799 0.3
3.01-4.00%......................... 19,601 0.8 64,496 2.5
4.01-5.00%......................... 1,166,347 46.7 304,163 11.7
5.01-6.00%......................... 669,603 26.8 900,019 34.6
6.01-7.00%......................... 199,747 8.0 771,247 29.7
7.01-8.00%......................... 17,321 0.7 76,167 2.9
Over 8.00%......................... 11,693 0.5 12,078 0.5
---------- ----- ---------- -----
2,088,952 83.7 2,134,969 82.2
---------- ----- ---------- -----
Total deposits................... $2,495,933 100.0% $2,600,869 100.0%
========== ===== ========== =====
Weighted average interest rate....... 4.69% 4.89%
========== ==========
</TABLE>
Fidelity had noninterest-bearing checking accounts of $70.4 million and
$73.1 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. At December 31,
1996, certificate accounts were scheduled to mature as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF MATURITY AMOUNT
---------------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
1997........................................................ $1,968,891
1998........................................................ 78,884
1999........................................................ 23,045
2000........................................................ 4,590
2001 and after.............................................. 13,542
----------
$2,088,952
==========
</TABLE>
At December 31, 1996, securities totaling $0.6 million were pledged as
collateral for $0.1 million of public funds on deposit with the Company and
potential future deposits.
Certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more accounted for $543.3 million
and represented 21.8% of all deposits at December 31, 1996 and $528 million or
20% of all deposits at December 31, 1995.
The Company, from time to time, has also utilized brokered deposits as a
short-term means of funding. These deposits are obtained or placed by or
through a deposit broker and are subject to certain regulatory limitations.
Should the Bank become undercapitalized, it would be prohibited from
accepting, renewing or rolling over deposits obtained through a deposit
broker. The Company is currently eligible to accept brokered deposits. The
Company had no brokered deposits outstanding at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
F-21
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
In December 1994, the Bank sold $340.0 million of deposits to another
financial institution. Core deposit intangible assets related to such deposits
totaling $0.5 million were written off and are netted against the gain on the
sale. See Note 13.
NOTE 8--FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
FHLB advances are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance at year-end.................................. $ 449,851 $ 292,700
Average amount outstanding during the year........... $ 296,596 $ 314,918
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end.......... $ 449,851 $ 412,700
Weighted average interest rate during the year....... 5.43% 5.53%
Weighted average interest rate at year-end........... 5.53% 5.27%
Secured by:
FHLB Stock......................................... $ 52,330 $ 49,425
Loans receivable(1)................................ 989,138 1,174,513
Investment securities and MBS, at cost............. 117,786 --
---------- ----------
$1,159,254 $1,223,938
========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes pledged loans available for use under the letter of credit
securing commercial paper. See Note 9.
The maturities and weighted average interest rates on FHLB advances are
summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
---------------------- ----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE
YEAR OF MATURITY AMOUNT INTEREST RATE AMOUNT INTEREST RATE
---------------- -------- ------------- -------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996......................... $ -- -- % $ 60,000 4.88%
1997......................... 329,851 5.05 212,700 5.06
2000......................... 20,000 8.61 20,000 8.61
2003......................... 100,000 6.49 -- --
-------- --------
$449,851 5.53 $292,700 5.27
======== ========
</TABLE>
NOTE 9--OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
YEAR OF -----------------
MATURITY 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Short-term borrowings:
Commercial paper............................... 1996 $ -- $ 50,000
Commercial paper............................... 1997 40,000 --
8 1/2% Mortgage-backed medium-term notes
("MTNs")...................................... 1997 100,000 100,000
-------- --------
$140,000 $150,000
======== ========
</TABLE>
F-22
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The mortgage-backed notes are secured by a joint pool of mortgage loans and
U.S. Treasury notes, at cost, totaling $226.2 million and $246.5 million at
December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Borrowings other than the mortgage-backed notes are summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------
1996 1995
-------- --------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Commercial paper:
Balance at year-end.................................... $ 40,000 $ 50,000
Average amount outstanding during the year............. $ 93,457 $289,028
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end............ $140,000 $400,000
Weighted average interest rate during the year......... 5.72% 6.02%
Weighted average interest rate at year end............. 5.36% 5.70%
Secured by Letter of Credit from FHLB.................. $150,000 $500,000
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase:
Balance at year-end.................................... $ -- $ --
Average amount outstanding during the year............. $ 25,382 $ 12,424
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end............ $ 73,007 $ 20,345
Weighted average interest rate during the year......... 5.17% 5.88%
</TABLE>
The weighted average interest rate on other borrowings was 7.60% and 7.57%
at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
NOTE 10--BENEFIT PLANS
Retirement Income Plan
The Company has a retirement income plan covering substantially all
employees. The defined benefit plan provides for payment of retirement
benefits commencing normally at age 65 in a monthly annuity; however, the
option of a lump sum payment is available upon retirement or in the event of
early termination. An employee becomes vested upon five years of service.
Benefits payable under the plan are generally determined on the basis of the
employee's length of service and average earnings over the previous five
years. Annual contributions to the plan are sufficient to satisfy legal
funding requirements.
In February 1994, the Board of Directors passed a resolution to amend the
plan by discontinuing participation in the plan by newly hired employees and
freezing the level of service and salaries used to compute the plan benefit to
February 28, 1994 levels. The Bank has funded the retirement income plan such
that the fair value of plan assets exceed the projected benefit obligation.
The components of net pension costs are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- ------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost........................................... $ -- $ -- $ 219
Interest cost.......................................... 202 218 542
Actual return on plan assets........................... (426) (371) 444
Net amortization and deferral.......................... 149 92 (945)
Effect of partial settlements.......................... 189 252 1,389
----- ----- ------
$ 114 $ 191 $1,649
===== ===== ======
</TABLE>
F-23
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The funded status of this plan, as of the dates indicated, was as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated benefit obligation:
Vested.......................................... $ 2,360 $ 2,663
Nonvested....................................... 62 123
----------- -----------
$ 2,422 $ 2,786
=========== ===========
Projected benefit obligation...................... $ (2,422) $ (2,786)
Fair value of plan assets......................... 2,546 2,589
----------- -----------
Net plan assets (liabilities) under projected
benefit obligation............................... 124 (197)
Minimum liability adjustment...................... 753 988
----------- -----------
Prepaid pension cost............................ $ 877 $ 791
=========== ===========
Actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate................................... 7.25% 7.25%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets......................................... 9.00% 9.00%
</TABLE>
401(k) Plan
The Company has a 401(k) defined contribution plan available to all
employees who have been with the Company for one year and have reached the age
of 21. Employees may generally contribute up to 15% of their salary each year,
and the Company matches 12.5% up to the first 6% contributed by the employee;
the matching contribution was adjusted down from 50% to 12.5% during 1995. In
addition, the Company may elect, at its discretion, to match an amount based
on the Company's profitability as determined on an annual basis by the Board
of Directors. The Company's contribution expense was $0.1 million, $0.3
million and $0.5 million in the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994,
respectively.
Director Retirement Plan
In November 1994, the Board of Directors approved a retirement plan for non-
employee directors who have at least three years of Board service, including
service on the Board prior to the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization.
An eligible director shall, after termination from Board service for any
reason other than cause, be entitled to receive a quarterly payment equal to
one quarter of his/her average annual compensation (including compensation for
service on the Board of any of the Company's subsidiaries), including all
retainers and meeting fees, received during his/her last three years of Board
service. Such payments shall commence at the beginning of the first fiscal
quarter subsequent to termination and continue for a 3-year period. If a
director's Board membership is terminated for cause, no benefits are payable
under this plan.
If a director's Board membership is terminated within two years following
the effective date of a change in control, then he/she also shall be eligible
for a lump sum payment in an amount that is the greater of: (1) 150% times
average annual compensation during the preceding 3-year period, (2) the sum of
all retirement benefits payable under normal retirement provisions described
in the preceding paragraph or (3) $78,000. The Company's accumulated benefit
obligation was $0.2 million at both December 31, 1996 and 1995, and net
pension costs were $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December
31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
F-24
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 11--INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense/benefit comprised the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31,
----------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- ---- --------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current income tax expense (benefit):
Federal........................................... $(1,100) $-- $ (1,744)
State............................................. 7 4 9
------- ---- --------
(1,093) 4 (1,735)
------- ---- --------
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Federal........................................... -- -- (14,789)
State............................................. -- -- --
------- ---- --------
-- -- (14,789)
------- ---- --------
$(1,093) $ 4 $(16,524)
======= ==== ========
</TABLE>
Income tax liability/receivable comprised the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current income tax (receivable) liability:
Federal.......................................... $ (286) $ 477
State............................................ (73) --
----------- -----------
(359) 477
----------- -----------
Deferred income tax (receivable) liability:
Federal.......................................... (32,997) (32,541)
Valuation allowance--Federal..................... 32,997 32,541
State............................................ (6,751) (7,702)
Valuation allowance--State....................... 6,751 7,702
----------- -----------
-- --
----------- -----------
$ (359) $ 477
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
F-25
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The components of the net deferred tax liability/asset are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------
1996 1995
----------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
FEDERAL:
Deferred tax liabilities:
Loan fees and interest......................... $ 7,202 $ 7,844
FHLB stock dividends........................... 13,620 12,545
Accrual to cash adjustment on pre-1986 loans... 1,907 2,467
Other.......................................... 1,806 785
----------- -----------
Gross deferred tax liabilities................... 24,535 23,641
----------- -----------
Deferred tax assets:
Bad debt and loan loss deduction............... 6,997 14,619
Net operating loss carryover................... 40,190 32,876
Alternative minimum tax credit carryover....... 2,839 2,839
REO operations/acquisition costs............... 434 541
Deposit base intangibles....................... 2,392 2,516
Contingent liabilities......................... 2,752 --
Other.......................................... 1,928 2,791
----------- -----------
Gross deferred tax assets........................ 57,532 56,182
Valuation allowance.............................. (32,997) (32,541)
----------- -----------
Deferred tax assets, net of allowance............ 24,535 23,641
----------- -----------
Net deferred tax (asset) liability............... $ -- $ --
=========== ===========
STATE:
Deferred tax liabilities:
Loan fees and interest......................... $ 2,325 $ 2,533
FHLB stock dividends........................... 4,397 4,050
Accrual to cash adjustment on pre-1986 loans... 616 797
Other.......................................... 446 746
----------- -----------
Gross deferred tax liabilities................... 7,784 8,126
----------- -----------
Deferred tax assets:
Bad debt and loan loss deduction............... 8,729 9,265
Net operating loss carryover................... 4,126 4,929
Deposit base intangibles....................... 38 113
Contingent liabilities......................... 889 --
Other.......................................... 753 1,521
----------- -----------
Gross deferred tax assets........................ 14,535 15,828
Valuation allowance.............................. (6,751) (7,702)
----------- -----------
Deferred tax assets, net of allowance............ 7,784 8,126
----------- -----------
Net deferred tax (asset) liability............... $ -- $ --
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
Valuation allowances have been provided for both federal and state purposes
to the extent uncertainty exists as to the recoverability of the deferred
assets. As of December 31, 1996 and 1995, valuation allowances were
F-26
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
provided for the total net deferred tax assets. Future reductions in the
valuation allowance will be dependent upon a more likely than not expectation
of recovery of tax benefits.
A reconciliation from the consolidated statutory federal income tax benefit
to the consolidated effective income tax benefit follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected federal income tax benefit............ $(3,684) $(24,141) $(50,739)
Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from:
Franchise tax expense, net of federal income
tax and valuation allowance................. 4 4 6
Addition to valuation allowance.............. 456 21,095 11,689
Specified liability loss carryback under IRC
Section 172(f).............................. (1,100) -- --
Limitation of net operating loss carryover
benefits due to 1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization............................ -- -- 19,507
Prior period adjustment...................... -- 2,684 --
Bad debt recapture........................... 3,227 -- 4,678
Limitation of tax benefit on intercompany
transactions................................ -- -- 3,235
Redetermination of tax....................... -- -- (5,600)
Other, net................................... 4 362 700
------- -------- --------
Income tax (benefit) expense................... $(1,093) $ 4 $(16,524)
======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
The Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") has completed its examination
of the Bank's federal income tax returns through 1991. The Service will start
its examination of the federal income tax returns for 1992, 1993 and tax year
ended August 4, 1994 in early 1997. The California Franchise Tax Board (the
"FTB") has completed its examination of the California franchise tax returns
through 1988. Although the FTB has completed the field examination of the
California franchise tax returns for years 1989 through 1991, a final audit
report has not been received.
Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383 and the Treasury Regulations
thereunder generally provide that, following an ownership change of a
corporation with a net operating loss (an "NOL"), a net unrealized built-in
loss, or tax credit carryovers, the amount of annual post-ownership change
taxable income that can be offset by pre-ownership change NOLs, or recognized
built-in losses, and the amount of post-ownership change tax liability that
can be offset by pre-ownership change tax credits, generally cannot exceed a
limitation prescribed by Section 382. The Section 382 annual limitation
generally equals the product of the fair market value of the equity of the
corporation immediately before the ownership change (subject to various
adjustments) and the federal long-term tax-exempt rate prescribed monthly by
the Service.
As a result of the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization, the Bank
underwent an ownership change, ceased to be a member of the Citadel
consolidated group, and became subject to the annual limitations under Section
382. As a result of the 1995 Recapitalization, the Bank again underwent an
ownership change and became subject to the annual limitations under Section
382. The limitations imposed by the 1995 change of ownership are inclusive of
the limitations imposed by the 1994 change of ownership.
At December 31, 1996, the Bank had an estimated NOL carryover for federal
income tax purposes of $114.8 million, of which $19.1 million is subject to
annual utilization limitations as a result of the 1994 change of ownership and
expires by year 2008, $20.1 million expires by year 2009, $54.7 million
expires by year 2010 (of which $32.5 million of the 1995 NOL and all of the
pre-1995 NOLs are subject to annual and aggregate utilization limitations as a
result of the 1995 change of ownership), and $20.9 million expires by year
2011, if not utilized. For California franchise tax purposes, there was an
estimated NOL carryover of $36.5 million, of which $5.0 million expires by
year 1997 and $0.9 million expires by year 1998 (both of which are subject to
F-27
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
annual utilization limitations as a result of the 1994 change of ownership),
$15.8 million expires by year 1999, $6.0 million expires by year 2000 (of
which $3.2 million of the 1995 NOL and all the prior years' NOLs are subject
to annual and aggregate utilization limitations as a result of the 1995 change
of ownership), and $8.8 million expires by year 2001, if not utilized. The
deferred tax assets related to these NOLs have been recorded with a
corresponding valuation allowance in an equal amount under SFAS No. 109.
Effective for taxable years beginning after 1995, legislation enacted in
1996 has repealed for federal purposes the reserve method of accounting for
bad debts for thrift institutions. While thrifts qualifying as "small banks"
may continue to use the experience method, Fidelity is deemed a "large bank"
and is required to use the specific charge off method. In addition, this
enacted legislation contains certain income recapture provisions which are
discussed below.
A thrift institution deemed a "large bank" is required to include into
income ratably over 6 years, beginning with the first taxable year beginning
after 1995, the institution's "applicable excess reserves." The applicable
excess reserves are the excess of (1) the balance of the institution's
reserves for losses on loans other than supplemental reserves at the close of
its last taxable year beginning before January 1, 1996, over (2) the adjusted
balance of such reserves as of the close of its last taxable year beginning
before January 1, 1988. Fidelity's applicable excess reserves at December 31,
1995 are $14.6 million. This amount will be recognized into taxable income
over six years at the rate of $2.4 million per year starting with the taxable
year ended December 31, 1996.
The adjusted pre-1988 total loan loss reserve balance of $35.2 million as of
December 31, 1995, will be recaptured into taxable income in the event
Fidelity (1) ceases to be a "bank" or "thrift," or (2) makes distributions to
shareholders in excess of post-1951 earnings and profits, redemptions, or
liquidations. Based on current estimates, Fidelity has no post-1951 earnings
and profits at December 31, 1996. As a result, Fidelity's 1996 $3.0 million
dividend distribution to Bank Plus and $6.2 million distribution with respect
to its preferred stock will trigger reserve recapture into taxable income for
1996. Based on current estimates, there is no current period income tax
impact.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, a deferred tax liability has not been
provided for the adjusted pre-1988 total loan loss reserves. The Bank had
$26.0 million of such reserves at December 31, 1996 for which $9.1 million of
taxes have not been provided. Further use of these reserves will require
federal taxes to be provided at the then current income tax rate. Further use
of these reserves is not anticipated.
NOTE 12--COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries had a number of lawsuits and claims pending at December 31, 1996.
The Company's management and its counsel believe that the lawsuits and claims
are without merit. There is a risk that the final outcome of one or more of
these claims could result in the payment of monetary damages which could be
material in relation to the financial condition or results of operations of
the Company. The Company does not believe that the likelihood of such a result
is probable and has not established any specific litigation reserves with
respect to such lawsuits.
Fidelity enters into agreements to extend credit to customers on an ongoing
basis. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. Most commitments are expected to be
drawn upon and, therefore, the total commitment amounts generally represent
future cash requirements. At December 31, 1996, the Company had no commitments
to fund loans.
As of December 31, 1996, the Company had certain loans with a gross
principal balance of $90.3 million, of which $75.5 million had been sold in
the form of mortgage pass-through certificates, over various periods of time,
to four investor financial institutions leaving a balance of $14.8 million in
loans retained by the Company.
F-28
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
These mortgage pass-through certificates provide a credit enhancement to the
investors in the form of the Company's subordination of its retained
percentage interest to that of the investors. In this regard, the aggregate of
$75.5 million held by investors are deemed Senior Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates and the $14.8 million in loans held by the Company are
subordinated to the Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates in the event of
borrower default. Full recovery of the $14.8 million is subject to this
contingent liability due to its subordination. In 1993, the Bank repurchased
as an investment a portion of the mortgage pass-through certificates, and at
December 31, 1996, the balance of the repurchased certificate was $25.9
million and was included in the mortgage-backed securities available for sale
portfolio and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 115. The other Senior
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates totaling $49.6 million at December 31, 1996
are owned by other investor institutions. Due to the subordination of its
retained percentage interest, the Company considers all the loans underlying
the Senior Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates in determining its allowance for
loan losses and any estimated losses are reflected in the provision for loan
losses.
During 1992, the Company also effected the securitization by FNMA of $114.3
million of multifamily mortgages wherein $114.3 million in whole loans were
swapped for Triple A rated MBSs through FNMA's Alternative Credit Enhancement
Structure ("ACES") program. These MBSs were sold in December 1993 and the
current outstanding balance as of December 31, 1996 of $78.0 million is
serviced by the Company.
As part of a credit enhancement to absorb losses relating to the ACES
transaction, the Company has pledged and placed in a trust account, as of
December 31, 1996, $13.3 million, comprised of $7.6 million in cash and $5.7
million in U.S. Treasury securities at book value. The Company shall absorb
losses, if any, which may be incurred on the securitized multifamily loans to
the extent of $12.8 million. FNMA is responsible for any losses in excess of
the $12.8 million. The corresponding contingent liability for credit losses
secured by the trust assets was $6.6 million and $3.8 million at December 31,
1996 and 1995, respectively, and is included in other liabilities.
In July 1996, the Bank settled an aggregate of $18.3 million of claims
asserted by a purchaser of assets from the Bank in a 1994 Bulk Sale
transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Bank received
$0.4 million and the parties executed mutual releases with respect to all
claims arising out of that particular Bulk Sale transaction.
On September 30, 1996 legislation was enacted that required member
institutions to recapitalize the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the
"SAIF") by paying a one-time special assessment of approximately 65.7 basis
points on all assessable deposits as of March 31, 1995. The one-time special
assessment resulted in the Bank recording an $18.0 million charge in
additional SAIF premiums.
The Company conducts portions of its operations from leased facilities. All
of the Company's leases are operating leases. At December 31, 1996, aggregate
minimum rental commitments on operating leases with noncancelable terms in
excess of one year were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR OF COMMITMENT AMOUNT
------------------ -----------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
1997........................................................ $ 3,547
1998........................................................ 3,575
1999........................................................ 3,240
2000........................................................ 2,635
2001........................................................ 2,361
Thereafter.................................................. 9,964
-------
$25,322
=======
</TABLE>
Operating expense includes rent expense of $3.3 million in 1996, $3.1
million in 1995 and $2.9 million in 1994.
F-29
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 13--RECAPITALIZATION
1995 Recapitalization
In the fourth quarter of 1995, Fidelity completed the 1995 Recapitalization
of the Bank, pursuant to which Fidelity raised approximately $134.4 million in
net new equity through the sale of 2,070,000 of Series A Preferred Stock and
47,000,000 of Class A Common Stock. As part of the 1995 Recapitalization,
Fidelity adopted the Accelerated Asset Resolution Plan which is designed to
aggressively dispose of, resolve or otherwise manage a pool of multifamily
loans. As a result, the Bank recorded a $45.0 million loan portfolio charge
which represents the estimated additional losses expected to be incurred.
The 1995 Recapitalization expenses of $2.6 million were charged directly
against equity while the $45.0 million loan portfolio restructuring charge is
reflected in the statement of operations.
1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization
During 1994, Fidelity and Citadel completed the 1994 Restructuring and
Recapitalization pursuant to which (a) Fidelity raised approximately $109
million in net new equity, and Citadel's ownership interest in Fidelity was
reduced to 16.2% of the then outstanding common stock and was retroactively
reclassified into 4,202,243 shares of Class A Common Stock; (b) Fidelity
purchased Gateway from Citadel; (c) Citadel, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, purchased certain real properties from Fidelity, a portion of
which was financed by Fidelity; (d) Citadel received from Fidelity, by way of
dividend, options to acquire, at the then net book value, certain real
properties utilized in the operations of the Bank, portions of which would be
leased back; (e) Fidelity redeemed its $60 million of subordinated notes;
(f) Fidelity consummated the branch sales; and (g) Fidelity consummated the
bulk sales, including certain assets sold to Citadel (see item (c) above), of
nonperforming and other primarily problem assets with an aggregate gross book
value of $563.3 million.
The 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization charges as reflected in the
statement of operations are comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Provisions for estimated bulk sale losses...................... $(56,296)
1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization charges
and expenses.................................................. (14,146)
Gain on the branch sales....................................... 5,048
--------
$(65,394)
========
</TABLE>
NOTE 14--REGULATORY MATTERS
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA")
required the OTS to implement a system requiring regulatory sanctions against
institutions that are not adequately capitalized, with the sanctions growing
more severe, the lower the institution's capital. Under FDICIA, the OTS issued
Prompt Corrective Action ("PCA") regulations establishing specific capital
ratios for five separate capital categories. The five categories of ratios
are:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CORE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL TOTAL
TIER 1 TO TIER 1 TO CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED TOTAL RISK- RISK-
ASSETS WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
CAPITAL CATEGORIES: (LEVERAGE RATIO) ASSETS RATIO ASSETS RATIO
------------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Well capitalized.................... 5% or above 6% or above 10% or above
Adequately capitalized.............. 4% or above 4% or above 8% or above
Undercapitalized.................... Under 4% Under 4% Under 8%
Significantly undercapitalized...... Under 3% Under 3% Under 6%
Critically undercapitalized......... Ratio of tangible equity to adjusted total
assets of 2% or less
</TABLE>
F-30
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
As of December 31, 1996, the most recent notification from the OTS
categorized the Bank as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for
PCA. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management
believes have changed the Bank's category. The following table summarizes the
minimum required capital ratios of the well capitalized category and
Fidelity's regulatory capital at December 31, 1996 as compared to such ratios.
As indicated in the table, Fidelity's capital levels exceeded the three
minimum capital ratios of the well capitalized category.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CORE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL
TIER 1 TO TIER 1 TO TOTAL CAPITAL TO
ADJUSTED RISK-WEIGHTED RISK-WEIGHTED
TOTAL ASSETS ASSETS ASSETS
--------------- ---------------- ----------------
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fidelity's regulatory
capital................ $ 209,200 6.29% $ 209,200 10.61% $ 233,600 11.85%
Well capitalized
requirement............ 166,300 5.00 118,300 6.00 197,100 10.00
---------- ---- ---------- ----- ---------- -----
Excess capital.......... $ 42,900 1.29% $ 90,900 4.61% $ 36,500 1.85%
========== ==== ========== ===== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(1)...... $3,325,400 $1,970,900 $1,970,900
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. section 567.1(a) for purposes of core capital
requirements, and refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in
12 C.F.R. Section 567.1(bb) for purposes of risk-based capital
requirements.
The OTS capital regulations, as required by the Financial Institutions
Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA") include three
separate minimum capital requirements for the savings institution industry--a
"tangible capital requirement," a "leverage limit" and a "risk-based capital
requirement." These capital standards must be no less stringent than the
capital standards applicable to national banks. The OTS also has the
authority, after giving the affected institution notice and an opportunity to
respond, to establish individual minimum capital requirements ("IMCR") for a
savings institution which are higher than the industry minimum requirements,
upon a determination that an IMCR is necessary or appropriate in light of the
institution's particular circumstances, such as if the institution is expected
to have losses resulting in capital inadequacy, has a high degree of exposure
to concentrations of credit risk, or has a high amount of nonperforming loans
or risks arising from nontraditional activities, or fails to adequately
monitor and control the risks presented by concentration of credit and
nontraditional activities.
Under FDICIA, the OTS was required to revise its risk-based capital
standards to ensure that those standards take adequate account of interest
rate risk, concentration of credit risk, and risks of nontraditional
activities. The OTS added an interest rate risk capital component to its risk-
based capital requirement originally effective September 30, 1994. However,
the OTS has temporarily postponed the implementation of the rule implementing
the interest rate risk capital component until the OTS has collected
sufficient data to determine whether the rule is effective in monitoring and
managing interest rate risk. This capital component will require institutions
deemed to have above normal interest rate risk to hold additional capital
equal to 50% of the excess risk. No interest rate risk component would have
been required to be added to the Bank's risk-based capital requirement at
December 31, 1996 and 1995 had the rule been in effect at these times.
F-31
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The following table summarizes the fully phased-in regulatory capital
requirements for Fidelity under FIRREA at December 31, 1996. As indicated in
the table, Fidelity's capital levels exceed all three of the currently
applicable minimum FIRREA capital requirements.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
RISK-BASED
TANGIBLE CAPITAL CORE CAPITAL CAPITAL
------------------ ---------------- -----------------
BALANCE % BALANCE % BALANCE %
----------- ----- ---------- ---- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Stockholders' equity(1). $ 210,300 $ 210,300 $ 210,300
Unrealized loss on
securities............. (1,000) (1,000) (1,000)
Adjustments:
Intangible assets..... (300) -- --
Nonincludable
subsidiaries......... (100) (100) (100)
GVA................... -- -- 24,600
Equity investments.... -- -- (200)
----------- ---------- ----------
Regulatory capital(2)... 208,900 6.28% 209,200 6.29% 233,600 11.85%
Required minimum........ 49,900 1.50 99,800 3.00 157,700 8.00
----------- ----- ---------- ---- ---------- -----
Excess capital.......... $ 159,000 4.78% $ 109,400 3.29% $ 75,900 3.85%
=========== ===== ========== ==== ========== =====
Adjusted assets(3)...... $ 3,325,100 $3,325,400 $1,970,900
=========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Fidelity's total stockholder's equity, calculated in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, was 6.32% of its total assets at
December 31, 1996.
(2) At periodic intervals, both the OTS and the FDIC routinely examine the
Bank as part of their legally prescribed oversight of the industry. Based
on their examinations, the regulators can direct that the Bank's financial
statements be adjusted in accordance with their findings.
(3) The term "adjusted assets" refers to the term "adjusted total assets" as
defined in 12 C.F.R. Section 567.1(a) for purposes of tangible and core
capital requirements, and for purposes of risk-based capital requirements,
refers to the term "risk-weighted assets" as defined in 12 C.F.R. Section
567.1(bb).
OTS Examinations
The OTS completed the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA") examination of the
Bank in the fourth quarter of 1995 and the Bank was rated "satisfactory".
In March 1996, the OTS completed its annual safety and soundness examination
and the Bank is addressing the OTS' concerns. Following the examination, the
Bank received notice that it is no longer considered by the OTS to be an
institution "requiring more than normal supervision."
Capitalized Software Costs
The Bank was notified by the OTS West Regional Office in April 1995 by a
written directive that certain computer software implementation or enhancement
related costs capitalized in accordance with GAAP are required to be
immediately expensed in the Bank's TFR and deducted from regulatory capital as
required in the instructions to the TFR and by OTS policy. As of December 31,
1995, the full amount in question, approximately $4.3 million, was reserved
and subsequently written-off in the first quarter of 1996.
F-32
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 15--STOCK OPTION PLANS
Stock Option Plans
On December 11, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted, subject to
stockholder approval, a stock option plan (the "1996 Stock Option Plan") which
replaced the then existing stock option plan of the Bank. On February 9, 1996
(the "Plan Effective Date"), the Bank's stockholders approved the 1996 Stock
Option Plan which provides that a maximum of 1,375,000 shares (after giving
effect to the Reverse Stock Split) of the Bank's Class A Common Stock be
reserved for awards granted under the 1996 Stock Option Plan to key employees
and the Bank's non-employee directors, subject to adjustment as set forth in
the 1996 Stock Option Plan. The 1996 Stock Option Plan is administered by the
Compensation/Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors, which is
authorized to select award recipients, establish award terms and conditions,
and make other related administrative determinations in accordance with the
provisions of the 1996 Stock Option Plan. Unexercised options granted under
the 1996 Stock Option Plan expire on the earlier of the tenth anniversary of
the Plan Effective Date or 90 days following the effective date of a
recipient's termination of employment or Board service for reasons other than
cause. In the event of an optionee's termination for cause, all outstanding
options are canceled as of the effective date of such termination. Bank Plus
assumed the 1996 Stock Option Plan in connection with the Reorganization.
On December 11, 1995 the Board approved the grant of options to certain
executives and key employees of the Bank at an exercise price of $2.10 ($8.35
after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split), at which time the market
value of the underlying Class A Common Stock was $2.06 per share ($8.25 after
giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split). The options vest at a rate of 10
percent on February 13, 1996 and, thereafter, 30 percent per year over the
next three years at the anniversary of the Plan Effective Date. Of the total
options granted, 1,025,000 were granted to six executives of the Bank, 87,500
were granted to other key employees of the Bank and 184,000 were granted to
the seven non-employee directors of the Bank, leaving 78,500 shares available
for future grants.
The following is a summary of the 1996 Stock Option Plan:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
NUMBER OPTION
OF OPTIONS PRICE
---------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Granted, December 11, 1995............................... 1,296,500 $8.35
Exercised.............................................. -- --
---------
Balance, December 31, 1995............................... 1,296,500 8.35
Expired................................................ (14,500) 8.35
Exercised.............................................. (2,800) 8.35
---------
Balance, December 31, 1996............................... 1,279,200 8.35
=========
</TABLE>
The fair value of options granted under the 1996 Stock Option Plan for 1996
and 1995 were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-
pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used: no
dividend yield, expected stock price volatility of 77% based on daily market
prices for the preceding five year period, risk free interest rate equivalent
to the 10-year Treasury rate on the date of the grant of 5.70%, and an option
contract life of 10 years. The Company applied Accounting Board Opinion No. 25
and related Interpretations in accounting for its stock option and purchase
plans. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock
option plan. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plan been
F-33
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the
plan consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and
loss per share for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 would have been
increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1996 1995
------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C>
Net loss:
As reported................................... $ (14,089) $(68,979)
Pro forma..................................... $(14,968) $(68,979)
Net loss to common stockholders:
As reported................................... $ (15,642) $ (68,979)
Pro forma..................................... $ (16,521) $ (68,979)
Net loss per common and common share equivalent:
As reported................................... $ (0.86) $ (8.84)
Pro forma..................................... $ (0.91) $ (8.84)
Weighted-average fair value per share of options
granted........................................ $ 6.87 $ 6.87
</TABLE>
NOTE 16--RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Citadel Indemnity
Fidelity agreed to cooperate with Citadel and certain related persons in the
defense of any claim or action that may be brought by any stockholder of
Fidelity against Citadel or any such persons arising out of or in any way
related to the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization. Except in certain
circumstances, if Fidelity is also a party to such claim or action, Fidelity
will provide Citadel and such persons with the defense thereof, with counsel
reasonably acceptable to Citadel.
Administrative and Operational Services
Pursuant to the terms of a Expense Sharing Agreement between Bank Plus and
Fidelity, Fidelity provides Bank Plus with all payroll, marketing, legal,
management information services, accounts payable, human resources and general
administrative services for a fee equal to 2.5% of the cost of certain shared
expenses plus a pro rata share of the overhead costs and expenses associated
with Bank employees who render such services to Bank Plus. Bank Plus paid
Fidelity $0.1 million under this agreement in 1996. No such costs were paid to
Fidelity prior to the formation of the holding company in May 1996.
Tax Sharing
The tax sharing agreement between Citadel and Fidelity was terminated prior
to the closing of the 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization on August 4,
1994. Citadel and Fidelity entered into a tax disaffiliation agreement which
sets forth each party's rights and obligations with respect to deficiencies
and refunds, if any, of federal, state, local or foreign taxes for periods
before and after the Closing and related matters such as the filing of tax
returns and the conduct of examinations by the Service and other taxing
authorities.
Fidelity entered into a new tax sharing agreement with its new parent
company, Bank Plus, which sets forth each party's rights and obligations with
respect to deficiencies and refunds, if any, of federal or state income or
franchise taxes effective on May 16, 1996 and related matters such as the
filing of tax returns and the conduct of examinations by the Service and other
taxing authorities.
F-34
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Purchase of Gateway Capital Stock
In May 1996, Fidelity contributed all the outstanding capital stock of
Gateway to Bank Plus as a capital contribution. The net book value of such
stock at December 31, 1995 was $0.8 million. As a result, Gateway became a
wholly owned subsidiary of Bank Plus.
Other Equity Transactions
Fidelity paid a cash dividend of $2.0 million in May 1996 to capitalize Bank
Plus, which had an immaterial effect on the Bank's tangible, core and risk-
based capital. In addition in November 1996, Gateway paid a cash dividend of
$0.3 million to Bank Plus.
NOTE 17--FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following is the Company's disclosure of the estimated fair value of
financial instruments. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined
by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, considerable judgement is required to interpret market
data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates
presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company
could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market
assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the
estimated fair value amounts.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1995
--------------------- ---------------------
CARRYING CARRYING
AMOUNT FAIR VALUE AMOUNT FAIR VALUE
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents...... $ 70,126 $ 70,126 $ 94,794 $ 94,794
Investment securities available
for sale...................... 156,251 156,251 94,305 94,305
Investment securities held to
maturity...................... 5,178 5,198 -- --
MBS available for sale......... 179,403 179,403 31,733 31,733
MBS held to maturity........... 30,024 27,169 -- --
MBS held for trading........... 14,121 14,121 -- --
Loans receivable............... 2,691,931 2,630,100 2,935,116 2,921,478
Interest receivable............ 20,201 20,201 20,162 20,162
Investment in FHLB stock....... 52,330 52,330 49,425 49,425
Mortgage servicing rights...... 2,141 11,000 4,632 4,632
Other assets................... 751 751 -- --
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits....................... 2,495,933 2,425,284 2,600,869 2,612,197
FHLB advances.................. 449,851 450,284 292,700 293,370
Commercial paper............... 40,000 40,016 50,000 50,113
Mortgage-backed notes.......... 100,000 100,000 100,000 105,294
Interest payable............... 10,718 10,718 9,438 9,438
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ASSETS
(LIABILITIES):
Commitment to sell MBS......... -- 25 -- --
Commitment to purchase MBS..... -- (4) -- --
</TABLE>
F-35
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The book value amounts reported in the statement of financial condition for
cash and cash equivalents approximate the fair value of such assets, because
of the short maturity of such investments.
Investment Securities and Mortgage-backed Securities
Estimated fair values for investment and mortgage-backed securities are
based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are
not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of
comparable instruments.
Loans
The estimated fair values of loans receivable are based on an option
adjusted cash flow valuation ("OACFV"). The OACFV includes forward interest
rate simulations and takes into account the credit quality of performing and
nonperforming loans. Such valuations may not be indicative of the value
derived upon a sale of all or part of the portfolio. The book value of accrued
interest approximates its fair value.
Investment in FHLB Stock
The book value reported in the statement of financial condition for the
investment in FHLB stock approximates fair value as the stock may be sold back
to the Federal Home Loan Bank at face value.
Other Assets
Fair value of interest rate cap and put option on treasury futures are based
on quoted market prices.
Deposits
The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market
deposits is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed rate
certificates of deposits is estimated by using an OACFV analysis.
Borrowings (Including FHLB Advances and Other Borrowings)
The estimated fair value is based on an OACFV model.
Off-balance sheet instruments, which include interest rate swaps, floors and
options
The estimated fair value for the Company's off-balance sheet instruments are
based on quoted market prices, when available, or an OACFV analysis.
NOTE 18--SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The terms of the Series A Preferred Stock issued by Fidelity pursuant to the
1995 Recapitalization provide for the making of an exchange offer by Bank Plus
of its 12% Senior Notes due 2007 ("Senior Notes") for the Series A Preferred
Stock. Bank Plus is contemplating commencing such an exchange offer in 1997.
The offering of Senior Notes in exchange for the Series A Preferred Stock will
only be made, if at all, by means of a prospectus.
F-36
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 19--QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER YEAR
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1996:
Interest income....... $ 60,052 $ 59,556 $ 59,020 $ 59,285 $ 237,913
Interest expense...... 38,216 37,790 37,775 38,842 152,623
Provision for
estimated loan
losses............... 3,905 3,905 3,900 3,900 15,610
Provision for
estimated real estate
losses............... 668 578 731 1,242 3,219
Gains on loan sales,
net.................. -- 6 3 13 22
Gains (losses) on
securities and
trading activities,
net.................. (83) 235 610 574 1,336
Operating expense..... 16,627 16,538 17,433 13,853 64,451
SAIF special
assessment........... -- -- 18,000 -- 18,000
Earnings (loss)
minority interest in
subsidiary........... 1,531 2,222 (16,371) 3,186 (9,432)
Minority interest in
subsidiary (dividends
on subsidiary
preferred stock)..... -- (1,552) (1,553) (1,552) (4,657)
Net earning (loss) ... 1,531 670 (17,924) 1,634 (14,089)
Preferred stock
dividends............ (1,553) -- -- -- (1,553)
(Loss) earnings
available for common
stockholders......... (22) 670 (17,924) 1,634 (15,642)
(Loss) earnings per
common share......... -- 0.04 (0.98) 0.09 (0.86)
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding.......... 18,242,465 18,242,465 18,242,715 18,243,890 18,242,887
Market prices of common
stock:
High.................. 9.75 9.50 10.63 11.75 11.75
Low................... 8.50 8.63 8.75 10.63 8.50
1995:
Interest income....... $ 60,570 $ 62,521 $ 61,700 $ 61,686 $ 246,477
Interest expense...... 42,641 45,625 43,618 42,952 174,836
Provision for
estimated loan
losses............... 4,020 11,131 8,773 45,800 69,724
Provision for
estimated real estate
losses............... 391 1,153 1,229 593 3,366
(Losses) gains on loan
sales, net........... (292) 938 15 (139) 522
Gains on securities
and trading
activities, net...... 939 3,159 -- -- 4,098
Operating expense..... 19,151 19,035 20,466 23,302 81,954
Net earnings (loss)... 1,049 (9,027) (10,579) (50,422) (68,979)
Net earnings (loss)
per share............ 0.16 (1.39) (1.63) (4.31) (8.84)
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding.......... 6,492,465 6,492,465 6,492,465 11,708,539 7,807,201
Market prices of common
stock:
High.................. 20.00 18.00 11.50 9.25 20.00
Low................... 16.00 11.00 6.00 5.50 5.50
1994(1):
Interest income....... $ 64,074 $ 60,610 $ 57,400 $ 59,381 $ 241,465
Interest expense...... 38,668 38,127 39,190 39,843 155,828
Provision for
estimated loan
losses............... 15,600 25,012 3,000 21,947 65,559
Provision for
estimated real estate
losses............... 4,300 2,067 1,459 942 8,768
(Losses) gains on loan
sales, net........... (2,804) (1,528) 566 (197) (3,963)
(Losses) gains on
securities and
trading activities,
net.................. (292) 40 (681) 2,063 1,130
Operating expense..... 24,179 24,597 23,428 19,655 91,859
Net loss(2)........... (14,151) (91,226) (8,232) (14,835) (128,444)
Net loss per share.... (13.47) (86.84) (1.84) (2.28) (39.08)
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding(2)....... 1,050,561 1,050,561 4,481,327 6,492,465 3,286,960
Market prices of common
stock:
High.................. NA NA 23.50 23.00 23.50
Low................... NA NA 21.00 17.00 17.00
</TABLE>
- -------
NA--Not applicable
(1) Excludes net 1994 Restructuring and Recapitalization charges.
(2) Prior to August 4, 1994, Fidelity was wholly owned by Citadel and its
stock was not traded. As a consequence of Fidelity's 1994 Restructuring
and Recapitalization, Citadel's ownership interest was reduced to 16.2% of
the then outstanding stock and was reclassified into 1,050,561 shares. All
share and per share amounts presented have been restated to retroactively
reflect the reclassification of Citadel's ownership interest in Fidelity.
F-37
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 20--PARENT COMPANY CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This information should be read in conjunction with the other notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
1996
------------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents.................................. $ 792
Loans receivable........................................... 709
Investment in subsidiaries................................. 158,513
Other assets............................................... 731
--------
$160,745
========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Liabilities:
Other liabilities........................................ $ 131
Stockholders' equity....................................... 160,614
--------
$160,745
========
</TABLE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EIGHT MONTHS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1996
------------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
INCOME:
Interest income........................................... $ 29
--------
EXPENSES:
Professional services..................................... 208
Other..................................................... 185
--------
393
--------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT.............................. (364)
Income tax benefit........................................ 149
--------
LOSS BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED LOSS AND MINORITY
INTEREST OF SUBSIDIARIES................................... (215)
Equity in undistributed net loss of subsidiaries.......... (9,217)
Minority interest in subsidiary (dividend on subsidiary
preferred stock)......................................... (4,657)
--------
NET LOSS.................................................... $(14,089)
========
</TABLE>
F-38
<PAGE>
BANK PLUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EIGHT MONTHS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
1996
------------
(DOLLARS IN
THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................. $(14,089)
Equity in undistributed net loss of subsidiaries.......... 9,217
Minority interest in subsidiary (dividend on subsidiary
preferred stock)......................................... 4,657
Other assets increase..................................... (707)
Other liabilities increase................................ 119
Other..................................................... (19)
--------
Net cash used in operating activities................... (822)
--------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Loans receivable increase................................. (709)
--------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends from subsidiaries............................... 2,300
Stock options exercised................................... 23
--------
Net cash provided by financing activities............... 2,323
--------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.............. $ 792
========
</TABLE>
F-39
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Incorporated herein by this reference is the information set forth in the
sections entitled "PROPOSAL NUMBER 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" and "DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" contained in the Company's Proxy Statement for its
1997 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "1997 Proxy Statement").
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated herein by this reference is the information set forth in the
section entitled "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION" contained in the 1997 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Incorporated herein by this reference is the information set forth in the
section entitled "BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK" contained in the 1997
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated herein by this reference is the information set forth in the
section entitled "RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS" contained in the 1997 Proxy
Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
----------- --------
<S> <C>
Independent Auditor's Report.......................................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 1996
and 1995............................................................. F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the Three Years in
the Period Ended December 31, 1996................................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for Each of the Three
Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1996.......................... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Years in
the Period Ended December 31, 1996................................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for Each of the Three Years
in the Period Ended December 31, 1996................................ F-8
</TABLE>
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the
information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related
notes.
II-1
<PAGE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Current reports of Form 8-K were filed with the SEC on October 22, 1996 and
November 20,1996 attaching the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Bank for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Bank for the quarter ended March 31, 1996, respectively, for incorporation
of such Form 10-K and Form 10-Q by reference into a Registration Statement on
Form S-8 filed by the Company with the SEC on November 22, 1996.
(c) Exhibits.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of March 27, 1996,
among Fidelity, Bank Plus Corporation and Fidelity Interim Bank.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-B of Bank
Plus filed with the SEC on April 22, 1996 (the "Form 8-B")).*
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Bank Plus Corporation (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-B).*
3.2 Bylaws of Bank Plus Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-B).*
4.1 Specimen of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-B).*
4.2 Form of Indenture relating to senior notes of Fidelity
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Form 8-B).*
10.1 Settlement Agreement between Fidelity, Citadel and certain lenders,
dated as of June 3, 1994 (the "Letter Agreement") (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-B).*
10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement, dated as of June 20, 1994
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-B).*
10.3 Amendment No. 2 to Letter Agreement, dated as of July 28, 1994
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-B).*
10.4 Amendment No. 3 to Letter Agreement, dated as of August 3, 1994
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-B).*
10.5 Mutual Release, dated as of August 4, 1994, between Fidelity,
Citadel and certain lenders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to the Form 8-B).*
10.6 Mutual Release between Fidelity, Citadel and The Chase Manhattan
Bank, NA, dated June 17, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6 to the Form 8-B).*
10.7 Loan and REO Purchase Agreement (Primary), dated as of July 13,
1994, between Fidelity and Colony Capital, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 8-B).*
10.8 Real Estate Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 3, 1994, between
Fidelity and CRI (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Form 8-B).*
10.9 Loan and REO Purchase Agreement (Secondary), dated as of July 12,
1994, between Fidelity and EMC Mortgage Corporation (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Form 8-B).*
10.10 Loan and REO Purchase Agreement (Secondary), dated as of July 21,
1994, between Fidelity and International Nederlanden (US) Capital
Corporation, Farallon Capital Partners, L.P., Tinicum Partners,
L.P. and Essex Management Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 to the Form 8-B).*
10.11 Purchase of Assets and Liability Assumption Agreement by and
between Home Savings of America, FSB and Fidelity, dated as of July
19, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Form 8-
B).*
</TABLE>
II-2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.12 Promissory Note, dated July 28, 1994, by CRI in favor of Fidelity
and related loan documents (3943 Veselich Avenue) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Form 8-B).*
10.13 Promissory Note, dated July 28, 1994, by CRI in favor of Fidelity
and related loan documents (23200 Western Avenue) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Form 8-B).*
10.14 Promissory Note, dated August 3, 1994, by CRI in favor of Fidelity
and related loan documents (1661 Camelback Road) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Form 8-B).*
10.15 Guaranty Agreement, dated August 3, 1994, by Citadel in favor of
Fidelity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Form 8-
B).*
10.16 Tax Disaffiliation Agreement, dated as of August 4, 1994, by and
between Citadel and Fidelity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 to the Form 8-B).*
10.17 Option Agreement, dated as of August 4, 1994, by and between
Fidelity and Citadel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to
the Form 8-B).*
10.18 Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of June 2, 1995, between
Richard M. Greenwood and Fidelity (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to the Form 8-B).*
10.19 Amended Service Agreement between Fidelity and Citadel dated as of
August 1, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the
Form 8-B).*
10.20 Side letter, dated August 3, 1994, between Fidelity and CRI
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Form 8-B).*
10.21 Placement Agency Agreement, dated July 12, 1994, between Fidelity,
Citadel and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.21 to the Form 8-B).*
10.22 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 3, 1994, between
Fidelity and Citadel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to
the Form 8-B).*
10.23 Litigation and Judgment Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated
as of August 3, 1994, between Fidelity and Citadel (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Form 8-B).*
10.24 1996 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24
to Form 8-B.*
10.25 Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Form 8-B).*
10.26 Form of Severance Agreement between the Bank and Mr. Sanders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Form 8-B).*
10.27 Form of Severance Agreement between the Bank and each of Messrs.
Osborne and Greenwood (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27
to the Form 8-B).*
10.28 Form of Severance Agreement between the Bank and each of Messrs.
Condon, Evans, Stutz & Taylor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.28 to the Form 8-B).*
10.29 Form of Severance Agreement between the Bank and Mr. Renstrom
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Form 8-B).*
10.30 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between the Bank and
certain officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the
Form 8-B).*
10.31 Form of Amendment to incentive Stock Option Agreement between the
Bank and certain officers (incorporated by reference Exhibit 10.31
to the Form 8-B).*
10.32 Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement between the
Bank and certain directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.32 to the Form 8-B).*
10.33 Form of Amendment to Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement
between the Bank and certain directors (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.33 to the Form 8-B).*
</TABLE>
II-3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.34 Loan and REO Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 15, 1994
between Fidelity and Berkeley Federal Bank & Trust FSB
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Form 8-B).*
10.35 Standard Office Lease-Net, dated July 15, 1994, between the Bank
and 14455 Ventura Blvd., Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.35 to the Form 8-B).*
10.36 Standard Office Lease--Modified Gross, dated July 15, 1994, between
the Bank and Citadel Realty, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to the Form 8-B).*
10.37 Loan Servicing Purchase and Sale Agreement dated March 31, 1995
between the Bank and Western Financial Savings Bank, FSB
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Form 8-B).*
10.38 Supervisory Agreement dated June 28, 1995, between Fidelity and the
OTS (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Form 8-B).*
10.39 Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Bank and its directors and
senior officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the
Form 8-B).*
10.40 Letter from the OTS to the Bank dated December 8, 1995, terminating
the Supervisory Agreement as of the date of the letter
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Form 8-B).*
10.41 Loan Servicing Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 15, 1996
between Fidelity and Western Financial Savings Bank (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1996).*
10.42 First Amendment to Standard Office Lease--Modified Gross, dated as
of May 15, 1995 between the Bank and Citadel Realty, Inc.*
10.43 Second Amendment to Standard Office Lease--Modified Gross, dated as
of October 1, 1996, between the Bank and Citadel Realty, Inc.*
10.44 Form of Indemnity Agreement between Bank Plus and its directors and
senior officers.*
10.55 Promissory Note, dated July 31, 1996, from Richard M. Greenwood to
Bank Plus.*
12. Computation of Ratio of Earnings (Loss) to Combined Fixed Charges
and Preferred Stock Dividends.*
21.1 List of Subsidiaries.*
27. Financial Data Schedule.*
</TABLE>
- --------
* Indicates previously filed documents.
II-4
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE
REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE
UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
BANK PLUS CORPORATION
/s/ Richard M. Greenwood
By: _________________________________
Richard M. Greenwood
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Date: June 13, 1997
II-5
