UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
þ
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For the year
ended December 31, 1999
|
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the
transition period from _______________ to
_______________
|
Commission File
Number: 000-23593
VERISIGN,
INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or
organization)
1350 Charleston
Road, Mountain View, CA
(Address of
principal executive offices)
|
|
94-3221585
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
94043-1331
(Zip
Code)
|
|
Registrants
telephone number, including area code: (650) 961-7500
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common
Stock
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO
¨
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
þ
The aggregate market value of the
common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of January 31, 2000
was approximately $16,746,000,000.
The number of shares outstanding
of the registrants common stock as of January 31, 2000 was
103,770,044.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy
Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2000 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part
II.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for historical
information, this Report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, including, among other things,
statements regarding our anticipated costs and expenses and revenue mix.
Such forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements
including the words expects, anticipates,
intends, believes and similar language. Our
actual results may differ significantly from those projected in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the
section Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of OperationsFactors That May Affect Future
Results of Operations. You should carefully review the risks
described in other documents we file from time to time with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q that we will file in 2000. You are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation
to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this
document.
PART
I
VeriSign is the leading
provider of Internet-based trust services, including authentication,
validation and payment, needed by websites, enterprises, electronic
commerce service providers, and individuals to conduct trusted and
secure electronic commerce and communications over wired and wireless
Internet protocol (IP) networks. We have established strategic
relationships with industry leaders, including BT, Cisco, Microsoft,
Netscape, RSA Security and VISA, to enable widespread utilization of our
digital certificate services and to assure their interoperability with a
wide variety of applications and network equipment. We have used our
secure online infrastructure to issue over 215,000 of our website
digital certificates and over 3.9 million of our digital certificates
for individuals. We believe that we have issued more digital
certificates than any other company in the world. Our Website Digital
Certificate services are used by all of the Fortune 500 companies with a
web presence and all of the top 40 electronic commerce websites as
listed by Jupiter Communications. We also provide enterprise digital
certificate services which allow enterprises and electronic commerce
service providers to leverage our trusted service infrastructure to
develop and deploy customized digital certificate services for use by
their employees, customers and business partners. Over 800 enterprises
and electronic commerce service providers have subscribed to our managed
certificate services since their introduction in November 1997,
including Agilent, Bank of America, Barclays, General Electric
Information Systems, Hewlett-Packard, the Internal Revenue Service,
Southwest Securities, Sumitomo Bank, Texas Instruments, VISA and US
West. We market our Internet-based trust services worldwide through
multiple distribution channels, including the Internet, direct sales,
telesales, VARs, systems integrators and our network of over twenty
affiliates which provide trust services under licensed co-branding
relationships using our technology and business practices.
Recent
Events
In December 1999, we announced
that we would acquire Thawte Consulting (Pty) Ltd. (Thawte),
a privately held South African company that provides digital
certificates to websites and software developers. We completed this
acquisition on February 2000 and issued approximately 4.4 million shares
of our common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of
Thawte. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase and,
accordingly, the results of Thawtes operations will be included in
our consolidated financial statements from the date of
acquisition.
Also in December 1999, we
announced that we would acquire Signio, Inc. (Signio), a
privately held company that provides payment services that connect
online merchants, business-to-business exchanges,
payment processors and financial institutions on the Internet. We
completed this acquisition on February 2000 and issued approximately 5.6
million shares of our common stock in exchange for all of the
outstanding shares of Signio and we also assumed Signios
outstanding employee stock options. The transaction will be accounted
for as a purchase.
We announced in March 2000,
that we would acquire Network Solutions, Inc. (Network Solutions
), a publicly held company that provides Internet domain name
registration and global registry services. Based on the completion of a
2-for-1 stock split of Network Solutions common stock on March 10,
2000, we will issue 1.075 shares of our common stock in exchange for all
the outstanding shares of Network Solutions. In addition, any options or
warrants to purchase Network Solutions capital stock will be exchanged,
as applicable, to purchase VeriSign common stock according to the
exchange ratio. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase. The
acquisition is subject to customary conditions of closing including
approval by both the VeriSign and Network Solutions
stockholders.
VeriSign
s Trust Services
VeriSigns Internet-based
trust services are built upon its proprietary WorldTrust software
platform, scalable operations infrastructure and comprehensive security
and trust practices. Our secure data centers, designed to provide
carrier-class reliability with advanced security procedures, allow the
issuance and management of millions of digital certificates.
Furthermore, because we have worked with industry leaders to embed our
digital certificate interface technology into a wide range of software
applications and network equipment, such as Netscape and Microsoft
browsers and servers and Cisco routers, our services are interoperable
with a wide range of IP-based applications. By providing a trusted
platform for commerce and communications, we are able to offer services,
including authentication, validation and payment to customers with a
wide range of needs. Our current service offerings are targeted towards
three primary areas: Website Digital Certificate services, Enterprise
Digital Certificate services and VeriSign Affiliate Certificate
services.
|
Website
Digital Certificate Services
|
VeriSigns family of
Website Digital Certificate services allows organizations to implement
and operate secure websites that utilize the SSL and WTLS protocols to
establish their identity to customers and other websites during
electronic commerce transactions and communications over wired or
wireless IP networks. Prior to issuing a digital certificate for a
websites server, we establish the authenticity of the website
through a series of background checks, including corroborating an
organizations authority to do business under a given name and
their authority to operate a server with a specific domain name or URL.
These practices protect organizations against another entity
impersonating their identity and allow online visitors and customers to
conduct private transactions and communications. Without a digital
certificate installed on the website server the SSL and WTLS protocols
cannot be utilized.
Our Website Digital
Certificate services are utilized by a broad range of merchant,
financial and government websites, as well as for intranet applications.
We currently offer two primary versions of our Website Digital
Certificate services, as well as several distinct versions, each
differentiated by the target application of the server that hosts the
digital certificate.
|
Secure Site and
Secure Site Plus Services. Secure Site is
our standard service offering that enables websites to implement basic
SSL security features between their sites and individual end-user
browsers. Secure Site includes certificate issuance, certificate
lifecycle management, administration functions, records retention,
directory integration and transaction security. We also offer an
upgraded version of this service, called Secure Site Plus, that
includes security monitoring, security assessment, site performance
monitoring and additional warranty protection.
|
|
Global Site and
Global Site Plus Services. Global Site is
an advanced version of Secure Site that incorporates all of the
features and functionality of our Secure Site services that allows
U.S. and international enterprises to offer stronger 128-bit encrypted
SSL sessions between their websites and
specially configured end-user browsers from Netscape and Microsoft. We
offer the only commercially available certificates for Netscape and
Microsoft that utilize 128-bit encryption. This service is typically
targeted to global financial institutions and online merchants that
require enhanced security. We also offer an upgraded version of this
service, called Global Site Plus that includes security monitoring,
security assessment, site performance monitoring and additional
warranty protection.
|
|
WAP Server
Certificates. WAP Server Certificates
provide authentication and encryption between wireless web servers and
mobile devices utilizing WTLS (wireless transport layer security
protocol). Our WAP server certificate service is compatible with WAP
servers from Motorola, Nokia, Phone.com and others.
|
In addition to our core
Website Digital Certificate services, we offer content signing
certificates. Content Signing digital certificates for developers enable
content providers, publishers and vendors to digitally sign their
content or Internet subscription channels in order to ensure
authenticity and integrity of the content delivered to
end-users.
Our Website Digital
Certificate services are offered on an annual subscription basis for
prices between $250 and $1,200 per server per year, depending on the
version of digital certificate requested and the overall volume of
website digital certificates used by the customer. Customers can
subscribe to the Website Digital Certificate services through the
VeriSign website, through selected international service providers or
through VeriSigns Enterprise Digital Certificate
services.
|
Enterprise
Digital Certificate Services
|
VeriSigns Enterprise
Digital Certificate services are sold under the VeriSign OnSite and
VeriSign Go Secure! brands, and are tailored to meet the specific needs
of corporations, electronic commerce service providers, financial
institutions, healthcare organizations, government agencies and other
enterprises that wish to issue digital certificates to employees,
customers, citizens or trading partners.
|
OnSite Services.
OnSite Services support a wide range of
digital certificate needs for both small and large user communities.
OnSite can be used by customers to provide digital certificates for a
variety of applications, including: controlling access to sensitive
data and account information, enabling digitally-signed e-mail,
creating an online electronic trading community, managing supply chain
interaction or facilitating and protecting online credit card
transactions. The OnSite service is designed to offer customers ease
of use at a low initial investment combined with broad flexibility and
scalability. OnSite services vary based on the nature and complexity
of the application and the degree of control customers desire to
maintain.
|
|
Go Secure!
Services. Go Secure! was introduced in June
1999 to provide managed applications services that enable enterprises
to quickly build digital certificate-based security into their
transaction and communication applications faster and more easily. Go
Secure! services are similar in functionality to our OnSite Services
and are designed to incorporate digital certificates into existing
e-mail, browsing applications, directory and virtual private network
devices.
|
To expand and complement our
Enterprise Digital Certificate services, we provide a professional
services group that includes experts in digital certificate architecture
and application integration. Our professional services group provides a
variety of design, development and implementation services. These
services include integration with existing applications and databases,
consulting on policies and procedures related to the management and
deployment of digital certificates, training classes on the latest
developments in security technology and the selection of enabled
software and hardware to complement a digital certificate
solution.
The Enterprise Digital
Certificate services are offered as an annual subscription service with
pricing dependent upon the number of users to be supported, the
complexity of the applications and the number of additional services
provided. Pricing typically ranges from $10,000 to $500,000 per year.
Customers can
subscribe to the OnSite service through the VeriSign website, VeriSign
s direct sales force, selected international and domestic service
providers or system integrators.
|
VeriSign
Affiliate Certificate Services
|
VeriSign Affiliate Certificate
Services are targeted at a wide variety of organizations that provide
large-scale electronic commerce and communications services over wired
and wireless IP networks. Examples include telecommunications companies,
Internet Service Providers, or ISPs, financial and other professional
services firms, electronic commerce service providers and businesses
that operate Internet-based communities of interest, such as
a web portal. These companies typically desire to offer digital
certificate services to their customers under either the VeriSign brand
or a co-branding relationship. In many cases, these digital certificate
services are integrated with other value-added services offered by the
organization. For example, an ISP may offer website digital certificates
in conjunction with its website hosting services for small and medium
size businesses, while a community of interest operator may offer
digital certificates to each member of the community in order to support
user authentication and secure messaging services. VeriSign designates
these types of organizations VeriSign Affiliates and
provides them with a combination of technology, support and marketing
services to facilitate their initial deployment and on-going delivery of
digital certificate services.
VeriSign Affiliate Certificate
Services are delivered through either the VeriSign Service Center or
VeriSign Processing Center offerings. Both offerings are based on the
WorldTrust software platform and enable a licensed VeriSign Affiliate to
offer one or more types of digital certificate services.
|
VeriSign Service
Center. The VeriSign Service Center
provides a VeriSign Affiliate with all of the capabilities needed to
perform subscriber enrollment and authentication, digital certificate
issuance, directory hosting, customer support, billing integration and
report generation from within their facilities while leveraging
VeriSigns secure data centers for back-end
processing.
|
|
VeriSign Processing
Center. The VeriSign Processing Center
provides a VeriSign Affiliate with all of the capabilities of the
Service Center plus the WorldTrust modules required to perform all
certificate processing functions from within their own secure data
center.
|
VeriSign also provides each
VeriSign Affiliate with the appropriate business readiness services to
facilitate the efficient and timely rollout of their digital certificate
offerings. These readiness services may include Service or Processing
Center installation and integration services, facility and network
design consulting, technical and customer support documentation and
training, sales and marketing support, operating practice templates and
local market customization.
VeriSign Affiliates that agree
to conform to certain standards are also offered membership in the
VeriSign Trust Network, an international network of digital certificate
service providers that operate with common technology, infrastructure
and practices to enable digital certificate interoperability on a
worldwide basis. VeriSign currently has affiliates located in Australia
(eSign), Brazil (Certisign), Canada (CIBC and VPN Tech), France
(CertPlus), Germany (Comparex Holdings), Japan (VeriSign Japan), Korea
(CrossCert), Middle East (Arabtrust), Netherlands (KPN Telecom),
Netherlands/Belgium and Luxembourg (Roccade Megaplex), South Africa
(SACA), Taiwan (Acer HiTrust) and the United Kingdom (BT Trustwise) as
well as several other countries.
VeriSign Affiliates typically
enter into a technology licensing and revenue sharing agreement with
VeriSign whereby VeriSign receives up-front licensing fees for the
Service Center or Processing Center technology, as well as ongoing
royalties for each digital certificate issued by the VeriSign Affiliate.
Initial licensing fees typically range from $250,000 to $2 million, and
royalties can range from 20% to 70% of the net revenue received by the
VeriSign Affiliate for each digital certificate.
Customers and
Markets
VeriSign has a broad customer
base from a variety of industry groups that require trusted and secure
electronic commerce and communications over IP networks. Following is a
representative list of customers that have purchased VeriSigns
services:
Financial
Services |
|
Telecommunications |
|
Manufacturing/Transportation |
American
Skandia Insurance |
|
AT
&T |
|
CSX |
Barclays
Bank |
|
BellSouth |
|
Eastman
Kodak |
Bank of
America |
|
British
Telecommunications |
|
Ford Motor
Company |
Deutsche
Bank |
|
Japan
Communication |
|
General
Electric Information Services |
First Union
Bank |
|
MCI
Worldcom |
|
Gillette |
First USA
Paymentech |
|
NTT
Communications |
|
Johnson &
Johnson |
Merrill
Lynch |
|
US
West |
|
Miller Brewing
Company |
Morgan Stanley
Dean Witter |
|
|
|
United Parcel
Service |
Royal Bank of
Canada |
|
Technology |
|
|
Sumitomo
Bank |
|
|
|
Government
|
TransUnion |
|
Agilent |
|
|
|
|
|
EDS |
|
Department of
Agriculture |
|
|
Hewlett-Packard |
|
Department of
Justice |
|
|
Intuit |
|
Federal Bureau
of Investigation |
|
|
Netscape |
|
Internal
Revenue Service |
|
|
NEC |
|
National
Security Agency |
|
|
NTT
Data |
|
Patent &
Trademark Office |
|
|
Texas
Instruments |
|
Social Security
Administration |
|
|
|
|
State of New
Jersey |
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Army |
|
|
|
|
Veterans
Administration |
VISA accounted for
approximately 10% of our revenues in 1997. No other customer accounted
for 10% or more of our revenues during 1999, 1998 or 1997.
Technology
VeriSign employs a modular set
of software applications and toolkits, which collectively make up its
proprietary WorldTrust platform, as the core platform for all of its
Internet-based trust services. The modular design of the WorldTrust
platform enables our trust services to be distributed over one or many
co-located or dispersed computer systems, allowing certain functions of
the certification process, such as registration, authentication,
issuance, revocation, renewal or replacement, to be deployed at customer
or affiliate locations while maintaining a secure and reliable link to
one of our secure data centers for back-end processing. These modules
can also be replicated in order to handle increased volumes of digital
certificates. Digital certificate service modules incorporated in the
WorldTrust platform include:
|
Subscriber Services
Module. Our subscriber services module
supports requests for digital certificate issuance, revocation,
renewal and replacement. Software toolkits are provided to permit
rapid customization and integration of digital certificate services
with a customers business-specific web-based
solutions.
|
|
Authentication
Services Module. Our authentication
services module supports manual, automated and delegated
authentication of subscribers by designated sources prior to digital
certificate issuance. We provide software toolkits and programming
interfaces to allow for integration with various process models and
database systems.
|
|
Administration
and Support Modules. Our administration and
support modules provide lifecycle services such as digital certificate
revocation, renewal and reissuance, as well as a customer support
knowledge base to facilitate general reporting of CA activity, and
web-based and e-mail-based support for customers and end
users.
|
|
Directory Services
Module. Our directory services module
utilizes database applications typically hosted at one of our secure
data centers to support the storage of and access to digital
certificates and associated information for a particular customer.
VeriSign OnSite customers and our affiliates can also download updated
copies of their directory information to their systems.
|
|
Service Control
Module. Our service control module is
hosted at one of our secure data centers and acts as a gatekeeper,
decoding and routing all digital certificate service requests based on
customer type, application type, security protocol, authentication
policies, certificate content and billing rules. This module utilizes
a proprietary, data-driven programming model to define each service
and dispatch the appropriate control and error commands to other
modules.
|
|
Digital Certificate
Processing Module. Our digital certificate
processing module is hosted at one of our secure data centers and
creates digital certificates with digital signatures on each
certificate, delivers digital certificates to subscribers and stores a
copy of each digital certificate for archive, audit and directory
purposes.
|
Infrastructure
VeriSign believes that its
highly reliable and scalable operations infrastructure represents a
strategic advantage in providing Internet-based trust services. Our
secure data centers are located in Mountain View, California and
Kawasaki, Japan. Our international affiliates also operate secure data
centers in their geographic areas. These centers operate on a 24-hour, 7
days per week basis and support all aspects of our Internet-based trust
services. VeriSign guarantees that a customers services are
operational on a 24 hour, 7 days per week basis, except for scheduled
downtime. By leveraging our WorldTrust platform, we can distribute
certain functionality of our secure data centers in optimum
configurations based on customer requirements for availability and
capacity. Key features of our infrastructure include:
|
Distributed Servers.
We deploy a large number of high-speed
servers to support capacity and availability demands. We can add
additional servers to support increases in digital certificate
volumes, new services introductions, new customers and higher levels
of redundancy without service interruptions or response time
degradation. The WorldTrust platform provides automatic fail-over,
load balancing and threshold monitoring on critical
servers.
|
|
Advanced
Telecommunications. We deploy and maintain
redundant telecommunications and routing hardware and maintain
high-speed connections to multiple ISPs and throughout our internal
network to ensure that our mission critical services are readily
accessible to customers at all times.
|
|
Network Security.
We incorporate advanced architectural
concepts such as protected domains, restricted nodes and distributed
access control in our system architecture. We have also developed
proprietary communications protocols within and between the WorldTrust
platform modules that we believe can prevent most known forms of
electronic attacks. In addition, we employ the latest network security
technologies including firewalls and intrusion detection software, and
contract with security consultants who perform periodic attacks and
security risk assessments. We will continue to evaluate and deploy new
technological defenses as they become available. See Management
s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsFactors That May Affect Future Results of Operations
System interruptions and security breaches could harm our
business.
|
|
Call Center and
Help Desk. We provide a wide range of
customer support services through a phone-based call center, e-mail
help desk and web-based self-help system. Our call center is staffed
from 5 a.m. to 6 p.m. PST and employs an automated call director
system. The web-based support services are available on a 24-hour, 7
days per week basis, utilizing customized auto response systems to
provide self-help recommendations and a staff of trained customer
support agents.
|
|
Disaster Recovery
Plans. Although we believe our operations
facilities are highly resistant to systems failure and sabotage, we
have developed a disaster recovery and contingency operation plan. We
also have an agreement with Comdisco Corporation to provide
replication of customer data, facilities and systems at another site
so that all of our services can be re-instated within 24 hours of a
failure. In addition, all of our digital certificate services are
linked to advanced storage systems that provide data protection
through techniques such as mirroring and replication. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of OperationsFactors That May Affect Future Results
of OperationsSystem interruptions and security breaches could
harm our business.
|
|
International
Affiliates. VeriSigns international
affiliates are required to build, implement and maintain their
infrastructure according to VeriSigns requirements. VeriSign
currently has affiliates located in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France,
Germany, Greece/The Balkans, Greece/Cyprus Southeastern Europe,
Ireland, Japan, Korea, Middle East, Netherlands, Netherlands/Belgium
and Luxembourg, South Africa (SACA), South Africa/Chile, Uruguay and
Paraguay, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.
|
Security and
Trust Practices
VeriSign believes that its
perceived level of trustworthiness will continue to be a significant
determining factor in the acceptance of its Internet-based trust
services. We believe that our reputation as a trusted party is based, to
a large extent, on both the security of our physical infrastructure and
the special practices used in our operations, which include our secure
data centers incorporating state-of-the-art physical and network
security. We believe we have established a leadership role in defining
and adhering to industry-endorsed trust practices and policies, a role
we believe enhances our perceived trustworthiness as a provider of
Internet-based trust services. Over the past three years, we have
invested, and continue to invest, capital and human resources in the
following key areas:
|
Employees.
We use stringent hiring and personnel management
practices for all operations and certain engineering personnel as well
as all executive management. We utilize a licensed private
investigation firm to conduct background checks into potential
employees criminal and financial histories and conduct periodic
investigations of such personnel on an ongoing basis.
|
|
Security Monitoring
Systems. We have sophisticated access
control and monitoring systems that help prevent unauthorized access
to secure areas and provide 24 hour, 7 days per week monitoring and
logging of activities within our facilities. These systems include
electronic key and biometric access control devices, video monitoring
and recording devices, deployment and automatic arming of motion
detectors, glass breakage detectors and remote alarm system
monitoring.
|
|
Site
Construction. Our secure data centers have
been built using construction techniques modeled after U.S. Army
specifications for facilities accredited to handle classified
information and contain a robust set of physical and environmental
defenses. These defenses include double layer, slab-to-slab wall
design, self-closing and locking metal doors at all secure entrances,
man traps, tamper proof enclosures for cryptographic materials and
fire prevention systems.
|
|
Back-up Power
Systems. We have invested in back-up power
systems that automatically activate in the event of a failure in our
primary power sources. These include uninterruptible power supply
systems and a diesel generator and fuel supply. To ensure reliability,
these systems are tested on a periodic basis.
|
|
Audits.
Our Practices and External Affairs Department
periodically performs, and retains accredited third parties to
perform, audits of our operational procedures under both internally
developed procedures and externally recognized standards.
|
|
Practices.
Our Practices and External Affairs Department is
responsible for the development of VeriSigns practices for
issuing and managing digital certificates. These practices are set
forth in our Certification Practice Statement, which we provide in
order to assure potential customers and strategic partners as to the
trustworthiness of our Internet-based trust services. The Practices
and External Affairs Department is also responsible for our
accountability and security controls and regularly monitors all
aspects of our secure data centers.
|
|
Policy Making
Activities. The Practices and External
Affairs Department also takes a leading role in a variety of
organizations that are defining standards for trusted and secure
electronic commerce and communications over IP networks. For example,
we actively participate in the United Nations Commission on
International Trade Law, which created the United Nations Model Law on
Electronic Commerce, the American Bar Associations Information
Security Committee, Section of Science and Technology, which has
drafted digital signature guidelines, the International Chamber of
Commerce ETERM Working Party, which is chaired by VeriSigns Vice
President of Practices and External Affairs, and the U.S. State
Department Advisory Committee on Electronic Commerce.
|
Strategic
Relationships
VeriSign has established
strategic relationships with leading companies across a number of
industry segments. We currently maintain strategic relationships with AT
&T, BT, Checkpoint, Cisco, Microsoft, Netscape, RSA Security and
VISA.
|
British
Telecommunications. BT is a member of our
international affiliate program. BT issues digital certificates and
provides a range of services for secure Internet access and electronic
commerce on a co-branded basis. With our support, BT has established
CA infrastructure in the U.K., including the creation of a secure data
center that adheres to our site construction specifications. We have
agreed to collaborate to develop legal practices and policies to
maintain compliance with U.K. and European-based regulations and
standards as they emerge.
|
|
Cisco.
Our technology is incorporated in Ciscos
Internetwork Operating System through the use of the jointly developed
Certificate Request Syntax (CRS) protocol, which enables digital
certificate functionality in a variety of Ciscos networking
products. As a result, IP networks utilizing Cisco network devices
such as routers and firewalls support applications that rely on
VeriSign digital certificates for authentication and network
management. We also engage in a variety of joint marketing efforts
with Cisco. Cisco is one of our stockholders.
|
|
Microsoft.
We work with Microsoft to develop, promote and
distribute a variety of client-based and server-based digital
certificate services and we have been designated as the preferred
provider of digital certificates for Microsoft customers. Our
technology has been embedded in Microsofts Internet Explorer
since version 2.0, allowing users to uniquely identify themselves to
web servers and securely access information over the Internet. In
addition, users can easily obtain their own digital certificate for
use with Explorer by registering on our website for our digital
certificates. We also provide Secure Site Services for Microsoft
s Internet Information Server product. VeriSigns services
can be used in conjunction with Microsoft Outlook 98 to enable the
delivery of secure email in extranet applications. In addition, in
September 1998, VeriSign and Microsoft announced plans for enhanced
integration of our digital certificate services with Microsoft
Exchange Server 5.5. The new capability offers a secure email extranet
gateway service that allows Exchange Server customers to
issue and manage digital certificates within the global VeriSign Trust
Network. VeriSign and Microsoft also jointly promote a set of
technologies and security policies for the secure authentication and
distribution of software over the Internet and engage in other joint
marketing activities. Microsoft is one of our
stockholders.
|
|
Netscape.
We work with Netscape on a variety of technology
projects and joint marketing activities. Our technology has been
embedded in Netscapes Navigator since version 1.1 and in Netscape
s Communicator since version 4.0. We also have an agreement with
Netscape that provides that Netscape feature us as a premier provider
of digital certificates on the Netscape website and also provides for
VeriSign to have a first right of participation for any new Netscape
products incorporating digital certificate technology. Users of
Netscape browsers can easily enroll for standard VeriSign digital
certificates using Netscape products. Netscapes SuiteSpot
product, including versions with 128-bit encryption capabilities, can
also utilize our Secure Site and Global Site services. We also support
Netscapes object-signing technology, enabling software
developers to digitally sign Java and JavaScript objects in order to
authenticate the developers identity and assure end users that
the downloaded objects have not been tampered with or
modified.
|
|
RSA Security.
We have an agreement with RSA Security
(formerly Security Dynamics) under which RSA Security will incorporate
custom digital certificate technology developed by VeriSign into RSA
Securitys future products. RSA Security has also agreed to be a
reseller of certain VeriSign OEM technology. We believe RSA Security
is a market leader in enterprise security and that, by including our
technology in RSA Securitys products, we will have a broader
potential market for our digital certificate services. RSA Security,
through a controlled entity, holds approximately 5% of our common
stock.
|
|
VISA.
We have an agreement with VISA under which we
provide SET digital certificate services to VISA on behalf of its
member banks, enabling them to offer branded SET-compliant digital
certificates to their cardholders and merchants.
|
Marketing,
Sales and Distribution
VeriSign utilizes a variety of
marketing programs to increase brand awareness. In addition to joint
marketing arrangements, we also engage in a variety of direct marketing
programs and public relations campaigns focused on owners of web
servers, home and business PC users and enterprise professionals. We
address these customers through outbound e-mail, telemarketing and
printed mail campaigns to stimulate product trial, purchase and usage.
We also use banner ads and text links that connect to our website and
participate in industry-specific events, trade shows, executive
seminars, industry association activities and various national and
international standards bodies. We have 48 employees engaged in
marketing activities.
VeriSign markets its
Internet-based trust services worldwide through multiple distribution
channels. These sales and service groups are based in our headquarters
in Mountain View, California, and in several field offices in the United
States as well as internationally. We also market our Internet-based
trust services through other distribution channels, including telesales,
VARs, systems integrators and our affiliates.
Outside the United States,
VeriSign markets its Internet-based trust services directly over the
Internet and through reseller and affiliate relationshipsthe
global VeriSign Trust Network. Except for VeriSign Japan, the members of
the global VeriSign Trust Network sell and support VeriSign
Internet-based trust services both within their local countries and
certain other foreign countries where we do not operate through a direct
sales subsidiary. In Japan, we market our Internet-based trust services
through VeriSign Japan, which maintains a secure data center in
Kawasaki, Japan, and employed 28 persons as of December 31, 1999.
Revenues from VeriSign Japan and other international customers were 27%
of total revenues in 1999, 14% in 1998 and less than 10% in
1997.
|
Internet Sales.
VeriSign distributes many of its
Internet-based trust services through its website. We believe that
Internet distribution is particularly well suited for sales of certain
of our website authentication products and Internet-based trust
services. We also use our website to assist in disseminating services
information and in generating services trials.
|
|
Direct Sales.
VeriSigns direct sales force targets
mid-sized and large corporations, financial institutions, commercial
websites, electronic commerce providers and federal and state
government agencies. We believe that these organizations have a
substantial installed base of PCs, web servers, IP networks and
high-speed access to the Internet and are most likely to be able to
benefit quickly from the use of digital certificates. The direct sales
force also targets international organizations that we believe are the
most suitable to act as VeriSign affiliates. As of December 31, 1999,
we had 70 sales and sales support employees in the United States,
while the international direct sales and sales support groups
consisted of 15 employees.
|
|
Telesales.
VeriSigns internal telemarketing operation is
responsible for customer prospecting, lead generation and lead
follow-up. This marketing activity qualifies leads for further follow
up by the direct
sales force or inside sales team or leads the prospect to our website so
that the prospect can access information and enroll for our
Internet-based trust services.
|
|
VARs and Systems
Integrators. VeriSign works with VARs and
systems integrators to package and sell its Internet-based trust
services. We also have a VeriSign Business Partner Program that allows
ISPs and web hosting companies to offer Secure Site services as an
integral part of their secure web hosting services.
|
Research and
Development
We believe that our future
success will depend in large part on our ability to continue to maintain
and enhance our current technologies and Internet-based trust services.
To this end, we leverage the modular nature of our WorldTrust platform
to enable us to develop enhancements rapidly and to deliver
complementary new Internet-based trust services. In the past, we have
developed Internet-based trust services both independently and through
efforts with leading application developers and major customers. We have
also, in certain circumstances, acquired or licensed technology from
third parties, including public key cryptography technology from RSA.
Although we will continue to work closely with developers and major
customers in our development efforts, we expect that most of our future
enhancements to existing services and new Internet-based trust services
will be developed internally.
As of December 31, 1999,
VeriSign had 91 employees dedicated to research and development. We also
employ independent contractors for documentation, usability, artistic
design and editorial review. Research and development expenses were
$13.3 million in 1999, $8.4 million in 1998 and $5.3 million in 1997. To
date, all development costs have been expensed as incurred. We believe
that timely development of new and enhanced Internet-based trust
services and technology are necessary to remain competitive in the
marketplace. Accordingly, VeriSign intends to continue recruiting and
hiring experienced research and development personnel and to make other
investments in research and development.
The market for Internet-based
trust services is an emerging market characterized by rapid
technological developments, frequent new product introductions and
evolving industry standards. The emerging nature of this market and its
rapid evolution will require that we continually improve the
performance, features and reliability of our Internet-based trust
services, particularly in response to competitive offerings and that we
introduce both new and enhanced Internet-based trust services as quickly
as possible and prior to our competitors. The success of new
introductions is dependent on several factors, including proper new
definition, timely completion and introduction of new services,
differentiation of new services from those of our competitors and market
acceptance of our new Internet-based trust services. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful in developing and marketing new
Internet-based trust services that respond to competitive and
technological developments and changing customer needs.
Our failure to develop and
introduce new Internet-based trust services successfully on a timely
basis and to achieve market acceptance for such Internet-based trust
services could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating
results and financial condition. In addition, the widespread adoption of
new Internet, networking or telecommunication technologies or standards
or other technological changes could require that we make substantial
expenditures to modify or adapt our Internet-based trust services. To
the extent that a specific method other than digital certificates is
adopted to enable trusted and secure electronic commerce and
communications over wireless and wired IP networks, sales of VeriSign
s existing and planned Internet-based trust services would be
adversely affected and our Internet-based trust services could be
rendered unmarketable or obsolete, which would have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We
believe that there is a time-limited opportunity to achieve market
share. We may not be successful in achieving widespread acceptance of
our Internet-based trust services or in achieving market share before
competitors offer products and services with features similar to our
current offerings. Any such failure by us could materially harm our
business.
Customer
Support
We believe that a high level
of customer support for customers as well as end users of digital
certificates is necessary to achieve acceptance of our Internet-based
trust services. We provide a wide range of customer support services
through a staff of customer service personnel, call center, e-mail help
desk and a web-based self-help system. Since we first introduced our
Internet-based trust services over three years ago, we have developed a
substantial knowledge base of customer support information based on our
customer interactions and we believe that this offers us a competitive
advantage. Our call center is staffed from 5 a.m. to 6 p.m. PST and
employs an automated call director system to provide self-help services
and, if necessary, to route support calls to available support
personnel. We also offer web-based support services that are available
on a 24-hour, 7 days per week basis and that are frequently updated to
improve existing information and to support new services. Our e-mail
customer support service utilizes customized auto response systems to
provide self-help recommendations and also utilizes a staff of trained
customer support agents who typically respond to customer inquiries
within 24 hours. As of December 31, 1999, we had 75 employees in our
customer support organization.
We also employ technical
support personnel who work directly with our direct sales force,
distributors and customers of our Website and Enterprise Digital
Certificate Services. Our annual maintenance agreements for our Website
and Enterprise Digital Certificate Services include technical support
and upgrades. We also provide training programs for enterprise customers
of our Internet-based trust services. As of December 31, 1999, we had 46
employees in our professional services organization.
Competition
Our Internet-based trust
services are targeted at the new and rapidly evolving market for trusted
services, including authentication, validation and payment, that enable
secure electronic commerce and communications over wired and wireless IP
networks. Although the competitive environment in this market has yet to
develop fully, we anticipate that it will be intensely competitive,
subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product and
service introductions and other market activities of industry
participants.
Our principal competitors
generally fall within one of three categories: (1) companies such as
Baltimore Technologies, Certicom Corp., Diversinet Corp. and Entrust
Technologies which offer software applications and related digital
certificate products that customers operate themselves; (2) companies
such as Digital Signature Trust Company (a subsidiary of Zions
Bancorporation) that primarily offer digital certificate and CA related
services; and (3) companies focused on providing a bundled offering of
products and services such as GTE CyberTrust (recently acquired by
Baltimore Technologies) and IBM (working jointly with Equifax). We also
experience competition from a number of smaller companies, and we
believe that our primary long-term competitors may not yet have entered
the market. Netscape and Microsoft have introduced software products
that enable the issuance and management of digital certificates, and we
believe that other companies could introduce such products. Additional
companies could offer digital certificate solutions that are competitive
with ours.
Several of our current and
potential competitors have longer operating histories and significantly
greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do
and therefore may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or
changing opportunities, technologies, standards and customer
requirements. Many of these competitors also have broader and more
established distribution channels that may be used to deliver competing
products or services directly to customers through bundling or other
means. If such competitors were to bundle competing products or services
for their customers, the demand for our products and services might be
substantially reduced and our ability to distribute our products
successfully and the utilization of our services would be substantially
diminished. In addition, browser companies that embed our interface
technologies or otherwise feature VeriSign as a provider of digital
certificate solutions in their web browsers or on their websites could
also promote our competitors or charge VeriSign substantial fees for such
promotions in the future. New technologies and the expansion of existing
technologies may increase the competitive pressures on us. There can be
no assurance that competing technologies developed by others or the
emergence of new industry standards will not adversely affect our
competitive position or render our Internet-based trust services or
technologies noncompetitive or obsolete. In addition, the market for
digital certificates is nascent and is characterized by announcements of
collaborative relationships involving our competitors. The existence or
announcement of such relationships could adversely affect our ability to
attract and retain customers. As a result of the foregoing and other
factors, we may not be able to compete effectively with current or
future competitors and competitive pressures that we face could
materially harm our business.
In connection with our first
round of financing, RSA contributed certain technology to us and entered
into a non-competition agreement with us pursuant to which RSA agreed
that it would not compete with our CA business for a period of five
years. This non-competition agreement will expire in April 2000. We
believe that, because RSA, which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of RSA
Security, has already developed expertise in the area of cryptography,
its barriers to entry would be lower than those that would be
encountered by our other potential competitors should it choose to enter
any of our markets. If RSA were to enter into the digital certificate
market, our business could be materially harmed.
Government
Regulation
Exports of software products
utilizing encryption technology are generally restricted by the U.S. and
various non-U.S. governments. Although we have obtained U.S. government
approval to export our Global Server digital certificates and none of
our other Internet-based trust services are currently subject to export
controls under U.S. law, the list of products and countries for which
export approval is required could be revised in the future to include
more digital certificate products and related services. If we do not
obtain required approvals we may not be able to sell certain
Internet-based trust services in international markets.
There are currently no federal
laws or regulations that specifically control CAs, but a limited number
of states have enacted legislation or regulations with respect to CAs.
If the market for digital certificates grows, the U.S. federal or state
or non-U.S. governments may choose to enact further regulations
governing CAs or other providers of digital certificate products and
related services. Such regulations or the costs of complying with such
regulations could harm our business.
Many companies conducting
electronic commerce over IP networks do not collect sales or other
similar taxes with respect to shipments of goods into other states or
foreign countries or with respect to other transactions conducted
between parties in different states or countries. It is possible that
the U.S. federal or state or non-U.S. governments may seek to impose
sales taxes on companies that engage in electronic commerce over IP
networks. In the event that government bodies succeed in imposing sales
or other taxes on electronic commerce, the growth of the use of IP
networks for electronic commerce could slow substantially, which could
materially harm our business.
Due to the increasing
popularity of IP networks, it is possible that domestic or foreign laws
and regulations may be enacted covering issues such as user privacy,
pricing, content and quality of products and services. The increased
attention focused upon these issues as a result of the adoption of other
laws or regulations may reduce the rate of growth of IP networks, which
in turn could result in decreased demand for our Internet-based trust
services or could otherwise materially harm our business.
Intellectual
Property
We rely primarily on a
combination of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secret laws,
restrictions on disclosure and other methods to protect our intellectual
property and trade secrets. We also enter into confidentiality
agreements with our employees, consultants and current and potential
affiliates, customers and business partners. We also generally control
access to and distribution of our documentation and other proprietary
information. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third
party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property or
trade secrets without authorization. In addition, there can be no
assurance that others will not independently develop substantially
equivalent intellectual property. There can be no assurance that the
precautions we take will prevent misappropriation or infringement of our
technology. We have also filed five applications for patents with
respect to certain of our technology. However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office may not award any patents with respect to these
applications. Even if patents are issued, they may not adequately
protect this technology from infringement or prevent others from
claiming our technology infringes that of third parties. Our failure to
protect our intellectual property in a meaningful manner could
materially harm our business. In addition, litigation may be necessary
in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect
our trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of the
proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in
substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources,
either of which could materially harm our business.
We also rely on certain
licensed third-party technology, such as public key cryptography
technology licensed from RSA and other technology that is used in our
Internet-based trust services to perform key functions. In particular,
RSA has granted VeriSign a perpetual, royalty free, nonexclusive,
worldwide license to distribute Internet-based trust services we develop
that contain or incorporate the RSA BSAFE and TIPEM products and that
relate to digital certificate issuing software, software for the
management of private keys and for digitally signing computer files on
behalf of others, software for customers to preview and forward digital
certificate requests to us, or such other services that, in RSAs
reasonable discretion, are reasonably necessary for the implementation
of a digital certificate business. Our agreement with RSA also requires
RSA to provide us maintenance and technical support for these services.
RSAs BSAFE product is a software tool kit that allows for the
integration of encryption and authentication features into software
applications. TIPEM is a secure e-mail development tool kit that allows
for secure e-mail messages to be sent using one vendors e-mail
product and read by another vendors e-mail product. These
third-party technology licenses may not continue to be available to
VeriSign on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The loss of any of
these technologies could materially harm our business. Moreover, in our
current license agreements, the licensor has agreed to defend, indemnify
and hold VeriSign harmless with respect to any claim by a third party
that the licensed software infringes any patent or other proprietary
right. Although these licenses are fully paid, there can be no assurance
that the outcome of any litigation between the licensor and a third
party or between VeriSign and a third party will not lead to obligations
for us to pay royalties for which we are not indemnified or for which
such indemnification is insufficient, or that we will be able to obtain
any additional license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In
the future, we may seek to license additional technology to incorporate
in our Internet-based trust services. Third party technology licenses
that we may need to obtain in the future may not be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. The loss of or inability to
obtain or maintain any of these technology licenses could result in
delays in introduction of our Internet-based trust services until
equivalent technology, if available, is identified, licensed and
integrated. This could materially harm our business.
From time to time, we have
received, and may receive in the future, notice of claims of
infringement of other parties proprietary rights. Infringement or
other claims could be asserted or prosecuted against us in the future,
and it is possible that past or future assertions or prosecutions could
harm our business. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of technical
and management personnel, cause delays in the release of new
Internet-based trust services or require us to develop non-infringing
technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty
or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all. In the event of a successful claim of
infringement against VeriSign and our failure or inability to develop
non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology
on a timely basis, our business could be materially harmed. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of OperationsFactors That May Affect Future Results
There are Risks Related to Intellectual Property Rights.
Employees
As of December 31, 1999,
VeriSign had 394 full-time employees. Of the total, 128 were employed in
sales and marketing, 91 in research and development, 121 in customer
support, 5 in practices and external
affairs, and 49 in finance and administration, including information
services personnel. We have never had a work stoppage, and no employees
are represented under collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relations with our employees to be good. Our ability to achieve our
financial and operational objectives depends in large part upon our
continued ability to attract, integrate, train, retain and motivate
highly qualified sales, technical and managerial personnel, and upon the
continued service of our senior management and key sales and technical
personnel, none of whom is bound by an employment agreement. Competition
for such qualified personnel in our industry and geographical location
in the San Francisco Bay Area is intense, particularly in software
development and product management personnel.
VeriSigns principal
administrative, sales, marketing, research and development and
operations facilities are located in two buildings in Mountain View,
California, where we occupy approximately 74,000 square feet under
leases that expire in 2005. We believe that our office space will be
adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.
VeriSign also leases space for
sales and support offices in Norcross, Georgia; Rosemont, Illinois;
Linthicum, Maryland; Wakefield, Massachusetts; Novi, Michigan;
Uniondale, New York; and Irving, Texas. In addition, we lease space in
Kawasaki, Japan for our offices and secure data center and we lease
space for a sales and support office in Upplands Vasby, Sweden. Our
success is largely dependent on the uninterrupted operation of our
secure data centers and computer and communications systems. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of OperationsFactors That May Affect Future Results of
OperationsSystem interruptions and security breaches could harm
our business.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Not applicable.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 4A.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth
certain information regarding the executive officers of VeriSign as of
December 31, 1999.
Name |
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Stratton D.
Sclavos |
|
38 |
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Dana L.
Evan |
|
40 |
|
Executive Vice
President of Finance and Administration
and Chief Financial Officer |
Quentin P.
Gallivan |
|
42 |
|
Executive Vice
President of Worldwide Sales |
Diana S.
Keith |
|
40 |
|
Vice President
of Customer Services |
Arnold
Schaeffer |
|
36 |
|
Executive Vice
President of Engineering |
Richard A.
Yanowitch |
|
43 |
|
Executive Vice
President of Worldwide Marketing |
Stratton D.
Sclavos has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and
as a director of VeriSign since he joined VeriSign in July 1995. From
October 1993 to June 1995, he was Vice President, Worldwide Marketing
and Sales of Taligent, Inc., a software development company that was a
joint venture among Apple Computer, Inc., IBM and Hewlett-Packard. From
May 1992 to September 1993, Mr. Sclavos was Vice President of Worldwide
Sales and Business Development of GO Corporation, a pen-based computer
company. Prior to that time, he served in various sales and marketing
capacities for MIPS Computer Systems, Inc. and Megatest Corporation. Mr.
Sclavos is also a director and a member of the compensation committee of
Network
Solutions, Inc. and a director of Keynote Systems, Inc. and Marimba, Inc.
Mr. Sclavos holds a B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering
from the University of California at Davis.
Dana L. Evan
has served as Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief
Financial Officer of VeriSign since she joined VeriSign in June 1996.
From 1988 to June 1996, she worked as a financial consultant in the
capacity of chief financial officer, vice president of finance or
corporate controller for various public and private companies and
partnerships, including VeriSign from November 1995 to June 1996, Delphi
Bioventures, a venture capital firm, from 1988 to June 1995, and Identix
Incorporated, a manufacturer of biometric identity verification and
imaging products, from 1991 to August 1993. Prior to 1988, she was
employed by KPMG LLP, most recently as a senior manager. Ms. Evan is a
certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree in Commerce with a
concentration in Accounting and Finance from the University of Santa
Clara.
Diana S. Keith
has served as Vice President of Customer Services since August 1998.
From June 1996 to August 1998 she was Director of Customer Services for
VeriSign. From May 1988 to June 1996 she was employed by Apple Computer,
Inc., most recently as the Senior Manager of Worldwide Operations of
Apple Online Systems. Ms. Keith holds a B.S. degree in Business
Management and Administration from San Jose State
University.
Quentin P.
Gallivan has served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales of
VeriSign since he joined VeriSign in October 1997. From April 1996 to
October 1997, he was Vice President for Asia Pacific and Latin America
of Netscape, a software company. Prior to that time, Mr. Gallivan was
with General Electric Information Services, an electronic commerce
services company, most recently as Vice President, Sales and Services
for the Americas.
Arnold Schaeffer
has served as Vice President of Engineering of VeriSign since he joined
VeriSign in January 1996. From March 1992 to December 1995, he was
employed by Taligent, most recently as Vice President of Engineering,
CommonPoint Products. Prior to working at Taligent, he served as a
software engineer for Apple, Intellicorp and Hewlett-Packard. Mr.
Schaeffer holds a B.S. degree in Information and Computer Science from
the Georgia Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. degree from the
University of California at Berkeley.
Richard A.
Yanowitch has served as Vice President of Marketing of VeriSign
since he joined VeriSign in May 1996. From July 1995 to May 1996, he was
a management consultant to private software companies. From 1989 to June
1995, he held a series of marketing positions with Sybase, Inc., a
software company, most recently as Vice President of Corporate
Marketing. Prior to that time, he held various sales, marketing and
operating positions with The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc., Digital
Equipment Corporation, Lanier Harris Corporation and Brooks
International Corporation. Mr. Yanowitch holds a B.A. degree in History
from Swarthmore College and an M.B.A. degree in Entrepreneurial
Management and Marketing from Harvard Business School.
PART
II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
VeriSigns common stock
has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol VRSN
since January 29, 1998, the date of our initial public offering.
Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low
closing prices for our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National
Market as adjusted for two-for one stock splits on May 29, 1999 and
December 6, 1999.
|
|
Price
Range
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
Year ended
December 31, 1998: |
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
(beginning January 30, 1998) |
|
$
11.72 |
|
$
5.13 |
Second
Quarter |
|
12.25 |
|
6.50 |
Third
Quarter |
|
11.22 |
|
5.47 |
Fourth
Quarter |
|
19.38 |
|
4.85 |
|
Year ended
December 31, 1999: |
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter |
|
$
38.50 |
|
$15.00 |
Second
Quarter |
|
44.13 |
|
24.63 |
Third
Quarter |
|
58.00 |
|
29.47 |
Fourth
Quarter |
|
190.94 |
|
51.16 |
On January 31, 2000, there
were 337 holders of record of our common stock although we believe there
are in excess of 67,000 beneficial owners.
The market price of our common
stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the
future. In addition, the market prices of securities of other technology
companies, particularly Internet-related companies, have been highly
volatile. Factors that may have a significant effect on the market price
of our common stock include:
|
|
fluctuations in
our operating results;
|
|
|
announcements
of technological innovations or new Internet-based trust services by
us or new products or services by our competitors;
|
|
|
analysts
reports and projections;
|
|
|
regulatory
actions; and
|
|
|
general market,
economic or political conditions in the U.S. or abroad.
|
We have never declared or paid
any cash dividends on our common stock or other securities and we do not
anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected
consolidated financial data are derived from VeriSigns
consolidated financial statements and are restated to reflect our
acquisition of SecureIT, Inc. in 1998 in a transaction accounted for as
a pooling-of-interests. See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. This data should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and with Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
Period
from
April 12, 1995
(inception) to
December 31,
1995
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share
data) |
Consolidated
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$
84,776 |
|
|
$38,930 |
|
|
$13,356 |
|
|
$
1,356 |
|
|
$
382 |
|
Total costs and
expenses |
|
88,086 |
|
|
62,075 |
|
|
34,657 |
|
|
12,415 |
|
|
2,524 |
|
Operating
loss |
|
(3,310 |
) |
|
(23,145 |
) |
|
(21,301 |
) |
|
(11,059 |
) |
|
(2,142 |
) |
Minority
interest in net loss of subsidiary |
|
836 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
3,955 |
|
|
(19,743 |
) |
|
(18,589 |
) |
|
(10,288 |
) |
|
(1,994 |
) |
Basic net
income (loss) per share |
|
.04 |
|
|
(.24 |
) |
|
(.65 |
) |
|
(.52 |
) |
|
(.11 |
) |
Diluted net
income (loss) per share |
|
.03 |
|
|
(.24 |
) |
|
(.65 |
) |
|
(.52 |
) |
|
(.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
|
1995
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Consolidated
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments |
|
$156,480 |
|
|
$41,745 |
|
|
$12,893 |
|
|
$30,006 |
|
|
$2,687 |
|
Working
capital |
|
140,163 |
|
|
31,085 |
|
|
6,160 |
|
|
24,788 |
|
|
2,284 |
|
Total
assets |
|
341,166 |
|
|
64,295 |
|
|
26,904 |
|
|
36,537 |
|
|
4,052 |
|
Stockholders
equity |
|
298,359 |
|
|
40,728 |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
28,520 |
|
|
3,376 |
|
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS
You should read the
following discussion in conjunction with VeriSigns consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto.
Overview
VeriSign is the leading
provider of Internet trust services, including authentication,
validation and payment services, needed by websites, enterprises and
individuals to conduct trusted and secure electronic commerce and
communications over IP networks. We have established strategic
relationships with industry leaders, including BT, Cisco, Microsoft,
Netscape, Network Associates, Network Solutions, RSA Security and VISA,
to enable widespread utilization of our digital certificate services and
to assure interoperability with a wide variety of applications and
network equipment. We have used our secure online infrastructure to sell
over 215,000 of our website digital certificates to date. In addition,
we have issued over 4.0 million of our digital certificates for
individuals. Our website certificates currently protect the websites of
a predominant number of leading online merchants, global financial
institutions, Fortune 500 companies and government agencies. We also
offer VeriSign OnSite, a managed service that allows an organization to
leverage our trusted data processing infrastructure to develop and
deploy customized digital certificate services for use by employees,
customers and business partners. Since its introduction in November
1997, we have sold over 800 OnSite service solutions to enterprises. We
have also begun to build an international network of affiliates who
provide our trust services under licensed co-branding relationships
using our proprietary technology and business practices. We currently
have affiliate relationships with over 20 organizations including
Arabtrust in the Middle East, BT in the United Kingdom, CIBC of Canada,
CertiSur of Argentina, Certplus of France, eSign of Australia, HiTrust
of Taiwan, KPN Telecom of The Netherlands, Roccade of The Netherlands,
the South African Certification Agency in South Africa, and Telia in
Sweden.
We have derived substantially
all of our revenues to date from fees for services rendered in
connection with deploying Internet trust services. Revenues from these
trust services consist of fees for the issuance of digital certificates,
fees for digital certificate service provisioning, fees for technology
and business process licensing to affiliates and fees for consulting,
implementation, training, support and maintenance services. Each of
these sources of revenue has different revenue recognition methods. We
defer revenues from the sale or renewal of digital certificates and
recognize these revenues ratably over the life of the digital
certificate, generally 12 months. We defer revenues from the sale of our
OnSite managed services and recognize these revenues ratably over the
term of the license, generally 12 months. We recognize revenues from the
sale of digital certificate technology and business process licensing to
affiliates upon delivery of the technology and signing of an agreement,
provided the fee is fixed and determinable, collectibility is probable
and the arrangement does not require significant production,
modification or customization of the software. We recognize revenues
from consulting and training services using the percentage-of-completion
method for fixed-fee development arrangements or as the services are
provided for time-and-materials arrangements. We recognize revenues
ratably over the term of the agreement for support and maintenance
services.
We market our Internet trust
services worldwide through multiple distribution channels, including the
Internet, direct sales, telesales, value added resellers, systems
integrators and our international affiliates. A significant portion of
our revenues to date has been generated through sales from our website,
but we intend to continue increasing our direct sales force, both in the
United States and abroad, and to continue to expand our other
distribution channels.
In connection with the
formation of VeriSign Japan, we licensed technology and contributed
other assets to VeriSign Japan. Subsequent to its formation, additional
investors purchased minority interests in VeriSign Japan. As of December
31, 1999, we owned 50.5% of the outstanding capital stock of VeriSign
Japan. Accordingly, our consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of VeriSign Japan and our consolidated statements of operations
reflect the minority shareholders share of the net losses of
VeriSign Japan.
VeriSign completed a merger
with SecureIT, Inc. (SecureIT) in July 1998. SecureIT is a
provider of Internet and enterprise security solutions comprising a full
range of products and services to assist clients with assessing,
designing and implementing security solutions. The merger was effected
by exchanging approximately 6,664,000 shares of VeriSign common stock
for all of the outstanding common stock of SecureIT. Each share of
SecureIT was exchanged for 0.164806 of one share of VeriSign common
stock. In addition, outstanding SecureIT employee stock options were
converted at the same exchange ratio into options to purchase
approximately 760,000 shares of VeriSign common stock. The merger
constituted a tax-free reorganization and has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests.
In December 1999, we announced
that we would acquire Thawte Consulting (Pty) Ltd. (Thawte),
a privately held South African company that provides digital
certificates to websites and software developers. We completed this
acquisition on February 2000 and issued approximately 4.4 million shares
of our common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of
Thawte. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase and,
accordingly, the results of Thawtes operations will be included in
our consolidated financial statements from the date of
acquisition.
Also in December 1999, we
announced that we would acquire Signio, Inc. (Signio), a
privately held company that provides payment services that connect
online merchants, business-to-business exchanges, payment processors and
financial institutions on the Internet. We completed this acquisition on
February 2000 and issued approximately 5.6 million shares of our common
stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of Signio and we
also assumed Signios outstanding employee stock options. The
transaction will be accounted for as a purchase.
We announced in March 2000,
that we would acquire Network Solutions, Inc. (Network Solutions
), a publicly held company that provides Internet domain name
registration and global registry services. Based on the completion of a
2-for-1 stock split of Network Solutions common stock on March 10,
2000, we will issue 1.075 shares of our common stock in exchange for all
the outstanding shares of Network Solutions. In addition, any options or
warrants to purchase Network Solutions capital stock will be exchanged,
as applicable, to purchase VeriSign common stock according to the
exchange ratio. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase. The
acquisition is subject to customary conditions of closing including
approval by both the VeriSign and Network Solutions
stockholders.
As a result of our
acquisitions of Thawte and Signio, we expect to record goodwill and
other intangible assets of approximately $2 billion. These amounts will
be amortized over a two to three year period, which will adversely
affect our results of operations. If we complete our proposed
acquisition of Network Solutions, we expect to record additional
substantial amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets. We expect
this amount may range from $18 billion to $20 billion. Therefore, we
will experience net losses as we incur charges relating to these
assets.
We have experienced
substantial operating losses in each fiscal period since our inception,
except for the fourth quarter of 1999. As of December 31, 1999, we had
an accumulated deficit of $47.5 million. These operating losses and
accumulated deficit resulted from the significant costs incurred in the
development and sale of our Internet trust services and in the
establishment and deployment of our technology, infrastructure and
practices. Although our revenues have grown in recent periods, we may be
unable to sustain this growth. Therefore, you should not consider our
historical growth indicative of future revenue levels or operating
results. In addition, although we achieved an operating profit during
the quarter ended December 31, 1999, we may not be able to sustain
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. A more
complete description of these and other risks relating to our business
is set forth under the caption Factors That May Affect Future
Results of Operations.
Results of
Operations
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Revenues |
|
$84,776 |
|
118 |
% |
|
$38,930 |
|
191 |
% |
|
$13,356 |
Revenues increased
significantly in 1999 from 1998 and 1997 due to higher sales of our
Internet-based trust services, particularly our website digital
certificates, affiliate processing and service centers, VeriSign OnSite
services, and the delivery of more training and services. In addition,
in 1999, we expanded our international affiliate network and experienced
significant growth in international markets. In 1998, we completed
certain work required under various consulting contracts and recognized
the related portion of revenues. We have had no significant increases in
our per-unit prices since the third quarter of 1997,when we increased
our per-unit prices for digital certificates by approximately
15%.
No customer accounted for 10%
or more of revenues in 1999 or 1998. VISA International accounted for
approximately 10% of our revenues in 1997. Revenues of VeriSign Japan
and revenues from other international customers accounted for 27% of
total revenues in 1999, 14% in 1998 and less than 10% in
1997.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Cost of
revenues |
|
$31,898 |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$19,454 |
|
|
101 |
% |
|
$9,689 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
73 |
% |
Cost of revenues consists
primarily of costs related to providing digital certificate enrollment
and issuance services, customer support and training, consulting and
development services and costs of facilities and computer equipment used
in these activities. Cost of revenues also includes fees paid to third
parties to verify certificate applicants identities, insurance
premiums for our service warranty plan and errors and omission insurance
and the cost of software resold to customers.
Growth of revenues was the
primary factor in the increase of cost of revenues in 1999 from 1998 and
in 1998 from 1997. We hired more employees to support the growth of
demand for our products and services during the period and to support
the growth of our security consulting and training activities. The cost
of insurance premiums for our service warranty plan increased because of
greater certificate volume as well as because this plan was not in
effect for a portion of 1997. In addition, we incurred increased
expenses for access to third-party databases, higher support charges for
our external disaster recovery program and increased expenses related to
the cost of software products resold to customers as part of network
security solution implementations.
Cost of revenues as a
percentage of revenues decreased in 1999 from 1998 and in 1998 from 1997
primarily due to the overall increase in revenues, the continued
realization of economies of scale from our technology infrastructure and
the efficiency gains in the certificate enrollment and issuance
process.
Certain of our services, such
as implementation consulting and training, require greater initial
personnel involvement and therefore have higher costs than other types
of services. As a result, we anticipate that cost of revenues will vary
in future periods depending on the mix of services sold.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Sales and
marketing |
|
$34,145 |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$22,943 |
|
|
94 |
% |
|
$11,826 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
89 |
% |
Sales and marketing expenses
consist primarily of costs related to sales, marketing, practices and
external affair activities. These expenses include salaries, sales
commissions and other personnel-related expenses, travel and related
expenses, costs of computer and communications equipment and support
services, facilities costs, consulting fees and costs of marketing
programs.
Sales and marketing expenses
increased in 1999 from 1998 and in 1998 from 1997 as a result of the
continued growth of our direct sales force and the expansion of our
marketing efforts, particularly in lead and demand generation
activities. The expansion of our international sales presence in Europe
during the second half of 1999 also contributed to the increase from
1998. The increase in 1998 from 1997 was also caused by the expansion of
the sales and marketing organization related to our security consulting
and training services. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased in each year primarily due to the greater revenue
base as well as the increase in recurring revenue from existing
customers, which tend to have lower acquisition costs associated with
them. In addition, the productivity of our direct sales force increased,
as did the effectiveness of our marketing lead and demand generation
activities.
We anticipate that sales and
marketing expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars as we
expand our direct sales force and increase our marketing and demand
generation activities both in the United States and
internationally.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Research and
development |
|
$13,303 |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
$8,435 |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
$5,303 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Research and development
expenses consist primarily of costs related to research and development
personnel, including salaries and other personnel-related expenses,
consulting fees and the costs of facilities, computer and communications
equipment and support services used in service and technology
development.
Research and development
expenses increased in absolute dollars in each year as we invested in
the design, testing and deployment of, and technical support for, our
expanded Internet trust service offerings and technology. The increase
reflects the expansion of our engineering staff and related costs
required to support our continued emphasis on developing new products
and services as well as enhancing existing products and services. During
1999, we continued to make significant investments in development of all
of our services. The decrease in research and development expenses as a
percentage of revenues in 1999 from 1998 and in 1998 from 1997 is
primarily due to the fact that revenues increased faster than research
and development expenses in these periods.
We believe that timely
development of new and enhanced Internet trust services and technology
are necessary to remain competitive in the marketplace. Accordingly, we
intend to continue to recruit experienced research and development
personnel and to make other investments in research and development. As
a result, we expect research and development expenses will continue to
increase in absolute dollars. To date, we have expensed all research and
development expenditures as incurred.
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
General and
administrative |
|
$8,740 |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$7,688 |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
$5,039 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
38 |
% |
General and administrative
expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related
expenses for our administrative, finance and human relations personnel,
facilities and computer and communications equipment, support services
and professional services fees.
Our expenses increased in 1999
from 1998 and in 1998 from 1997 primarily due to the increased staffing
levels required to manage and support our expanded operations, the
implementation of additional management information systems and related
procedures, and the expansion of our corporate headquarters. The
decrease in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues in these years is primarily due to the fact that revenues
increased faster than general and administrative expenses as we began to
experience economies of scale in our corporate
infrastructure.
We expect to continue to
invest in a more comprehensive executive and administrative
infrastructure, including upgrading to more robust information systems.
As a result, we anticipate that general and administrative expenses will
increase in absolute dollars.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Special
charges |
|
$
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
$3,555 |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
$2,800 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
In connection with our
acquisition of SecureIT, we recorded a special charge of $3.6 million to
operating expenses in the third quarter of 1998. The expenses included
$2.4 million for direct and other merger-related costs pertaining to the
merger transaction. Merger transaction costs consisted primarily of fees
for investment bankers, attorneys, accountants, filing fees and other
related charges. The remaining $1.2 million related to stock-based
compensation charges in connection with the acceleration of certain
performance stock options held by SecureIT employees.
In September 1996, VeriFone,
Inc., which subsequently became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hewlett-Packard, filed a lawsuit against VeriSign alleging, among other
things, trademark infringement. In November 1997, VeriSign,
Hewlett-Packard and VeriFone reached an agreement, under which, among
other things, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, which were
transferred to Hewlett-Packard, and VeriSign and VeriFone settled all
claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the third quarter of 1997
as a $2.0 million charge to operations.
In November 1997, we entered
into a preferred provider agreement with Microsoft whereby we agreed to
jointly develop, promote and distribute a variety of client-based and
server-based digital certificate solutions. Under this agreement, we
have been designated as the premier provider of digital certificates for
Microsoft customers. In connection with the agreement, we issued 400,000
shares of our common stock to Microsoft and recorded an $800,000 charge
to operations.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Interest
income |
|
$7,365 |
|
|
223 |
% |
|
$2,280 |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
$1,235 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Interest income consists
primarily of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments.
The increase in interest
income in 1999 from 1998 and in 1998 from 1997 is primarily due to a
higher average cash and short-term investment base as a result of our
offerings of our common stock to the public in January 1999 and January
1998.
|
|
1999
|
|
Change
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Other expense,
net |
|
$(936 |
) |
|
(485 |
)% |
|
$(160 |
) |
|
(162 |
)% |
|
$(61 |
) |
Percentage of
revenues |
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net consists of
interest expense on bank borrowings of VeriSign Japan, the effect of
foreign currency transaction gains and losses, gains or losses on the
disposal of property and equipment and other miscellaneous
expenses.
The increase in other expense,
net, is substantially due to higher losses on disposals of assets and an
increase in miscellaneous expenses.
We have not recorded any
provision for federal and California income taxes because we have
experienced an accumulated deficit since inception. As of December 31,
1999, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$127.4 million and California net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $64.5 million. If we are not able to use them, the federal
net operating loss carryforwards will
expire in 2010 through 2019 and the state net operating loss carryforwards
will expire in 2004. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 imposes substantial
restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits
in the event of a corporations ownership change, as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code. Our ability to utilize net operating loss
carryforwards may be limited as a result of such ownership change. We do
not anticipate that any material limitation exists on our ability to use
our carryforwards and credits.
We have recognized
approximately $46 million of deferred tax assets during 1999 to offset a
deferred tax liability of an equal amount, which arose as a result of
the comprehensive income arising from the unrealized gain on our
investment in Keynote Systems. Approximately $29 million of this offset
related to deferred tax assets, which resulted from stock option
exercises. Accordingly, a $29 million charge in lieu of taxes was
charged to comprehensive income, with an offsetting credit to additional
paid in capital.
We have provided a full
valuation allowance on the remaining deferred tax asset because of the
uncertainty regarding its realization. Our accounting for deferred taxes
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, involves the evaluation
of a number of factors concerning the realizability of our deferred tax
assets. In concluding that a full valuation allowance was required, we
considered such factors as our history of operating losses and expected
future losses and the nature of our deferred tax assets. Although our
operating plans assume taxable and operating income in future periods,
our evaluation of all of the available evidence in assessing the
realizability of the deferred tax assets indicated that such plans were
not considered sufficient to overcome the available negative evidence.
All of the remaining valuation allowance offsets deferred tax assets,
which arose as the result of stock option exercises. Accordingly, the
reversal of the remaining valuation allowance will result in a credit to
additional paid in capital and will not result in a future income
statement benefit. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
Minority
Interest in Net Loss of Subsidiary
|
Minority interest in the net
losses of VeriSign Japan K.K. was $.8 million in 1999, $1.3 million in
1998 and $1.5 million in 1997. The year-to-year decreases are primarily
due to VeriSign Japans increased revenue as compared to the prior
years. As the VeriSign Japan business continues to develop and evolve,
we expect that the minority interest in net loss of subsidiary will
fluctuate in future periods.
Factors That
May Affect Future Results of Operations
|
Our business
depends on the adoption and continued use of IP
networks.
|
In order for VeriSign to be
successful, IP networks must be widely adopted, in a timely manner, as a
means of trusted and secure electronic commerce and communications.
Because electronic commerce and communications over IP networks are new
and evolving, it is difficult to predict the size of this market and its
sustainable growth rate. To date, many businesses and consumers have
been deterred from utilizing IP networks for a number of reasons,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
potentially
inadequate development of network infrastructure;
|
|
|
security
concerns including the potential for merchant or user impersonation
and fraud or theft of stored data and information communicated over IP
networks;
|
|
|
other security
concerns such as attacks on popular websites by hackers;
|
|
|
inconsistent
quality of service;
|
|
|
lack of
availability of cost-effective, high-speed service;
|
|
|
limited numbers
of local access points for corporate users;
|
|
|
inability to
integrate business applications on IP networks;
|
|
|
the need to
operate with multiple and frequently incompatible products;
and
|
|
|
a lack of tools
to simplify access to and use of IP networks.
|
The adoption of IP networks
will require a broad acceptance of new methods of conducting business
and exchanging information. Organizations that already have invested
substantial resources in other methods of conducting business may be
reluctant to adopt new methods. Also, individuals with established
patterns of purchasing goods and services and effecting payments may be
reluctant to change.
The use of IP networks may not
increase or may increase more slowly than we expect because the
infrastructure required to support widespread use might not develop. The
Internet may continue to experience significant growth both in the
number of users and the level of use. However, the Internet
infrastructure may not be able to continue to support the demands placed
on it by continued growth. Continued growth may also affect the Internet
s performance and reliability. In addition, the growth and
reliability of IP networks could be harmed by delays in development or
adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased levels of
activity or by increased governmental regulation. Changes in, or
insufficient availability of, communications services to support IP
networks could result in poor performance and also adversely affect
their level of usage. Any of these factors could materially harm our
business. See BusinessCustomers and Markets.
|
Our market
is new and evolving.
|
We target our Internet-based
trust services at the market for trusted and secure electronic commerce
and communications over IP networks. This is a new and rapidly evolving
market that may not continue to grow. Accordingly, the demand for our
Internet-based trust services is very uncertain. Even if the market for
electronic commerce and communications over IP networks grows, our
Internet-based trust services may not be widely accepted. The factors
that may affect the level of market acceptance of digital certificates
and, consequently, our Internet-based trust services include the
following:
|
|
market
acceptance of products and services based upon authentication
technologies other than those we use;
|
|
|
public
perception of the security of digital certificates and IP
networks;
|
|
|
the ability of
the Internet infrastructure to accommodate increased levels of usage;
and
|
|
|
government
regulations affecting electronic commerce and communications over IP
networks.
|
Even if digital certificates
achieve market acceptance, our Internet-based trust services may fail to
address the markets requirements adequately. If digital
certificates do not achieve market acceptance in a timely manner and
sustain such acceptance, or if our Internet-based trust services in
particular do not achieve or sustain market acceptance, our business
would be materially harmed. See BusinessCustomers and
Markets.
|
System
interruptions and security breaches could harm our
business.
|
We depend on the uninterrupted
operation of our secure data centers and our other computer and
communications systems. We must protect these systems from loss, damage
or interruption caused by fire, earthquake, power loss,
telecommunications failure or other events beyond our control. Most of
our systems are located at, and most of our customer information is
stored in, our facilities in Mountain View, California and Kawasaki,
Japan, areas susceptible to earthquakes. Any damage or failure that
causes interruptions in our secure data centers and our other computer
and communications systems could materially harm our business. In
addition, our ability to issue digital certificates depends on the
efficient operation of the Internet connections from customers to our
secure data centers. Such connections depend upon efficient operation of
web browsers, Internet service providers and Internet backbone service
providers, all of which have had periodic operational problems or
experienced outages in the past. Any of these problems or outages could
adversely affect customer satisfaction.
Our success also depends
upon the scalability of our systems. Our systems have not been tested at
the volumes that may be required in the future. Thus, it is possible
that a substantial increase in demand for our Internet-based trust
services could cause interruptions in our systems. Any such
interruptions could adversely affect our ability to deliver our
Internet-based trust services and therefore could materially harm our
business.
Although we periodically
perform, and retain accredited third parties to perform, audits of our
operational practices and procedures, we may not be able to remain in
compliance with our internal standards or those set by third-party
auditors. If we fail to maintain these standards, we may have to expend
significant time and money to return to compliance and our business
could be materially harmed.
We retain certain confidential
customer information in our secure data centers. It is critical to our
business strategy that our facilities and infrastructure remain secure
and are perceived by the marketplace to be secure. Despite our security
measures, our infrastructure may be vulnerable to physical break-ins,
computer viruses, attacks by hackers or similar disruptive problems. It
is possible that we may have to expend additional financial and other
resources to address such problems. Any physical or electronic break-ins
or other security breaches or compromises of the information stored at
our secure data centers may jeopardize the security of information
stored on our premises or in the computer systems and networks of our
customers. In such an event, we could face significant liability and
customers could be reluctant to use our Internet-based trust services.
Such an occurrence could also result in adverse publicity and therefore
adversely affect the markets perception of the security of
electronic commerce and communications over IP networks as well as of
the security or reliability of our services. See Business
Infrastructure and Security and Trust Practices
and Properties.
|
We have a
limited operating history.
|
VeriSign was incorporated in
April 1995, and we began introducing our Internet-based trust services
in June 1995. In addition, we have completed three acquisitions since
1998. Accordingly, we have only a limited operating history on which to
base an evaluation of our business and prospects. Our prospects must be
considered in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by
companies in the early stages of development. These risks and
uncertainties are often worse for companies in new and rapidly evolving
markets. Our success will depend on many factors, including, but not
limited to, the following:
|
|
the rate and
timing of the growth and use of IP networks for electronic commerce
and communications;
|
|
|
the extent to
which digital certificates are used for such communications and
commerce;
|
|
|
the continued
evolution of electronic commerce as a viable means of conducting
business;
|
|
|
the demand for
our Internet-based trust services;
|
|
|
the perceived
security of electronic commerce and communications over IP
networks;
|
|
|
the perceived
security of our services, technology, infrastructure and practices;
and
|
|
|
our continued
ability to maintain our current, and enter into additional, strategic
relationships.
|
|
To address
these risks we must, among other things:
|
|
|
successfully
market our Internet-based trust services and our digital certificates
to our new and existing customers;
|
|
|
attract,
integrate, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel;
|
|
|
respond to
competitive developments;
|
|
|
successfully
introduce new Internet-based trust services; and
|
|
|
successfully
introduce enhancements to our existing Internet-based trust services
to address new technologies and standards.
|
We cannot be certain that we
will successfully address any of these risks.
|
We may not
be able to integrate our recent acquisitions
successfully
|
We acquired Thawte and Signio
in February 2000 and we have recently agreed to acquire Network
Solutions. We could experience difficulty in integrating the personnel,
products, technologies or operations of these companies. In addition,
assimilating acquired businesses involve a number of other risks,
including, but not limited to:
|
|
the additional
expense associated with the amortization of goodwill and other
intangible assets, which we expect will be an aggregate of
approximately $2 billion for the two acquisitions, and will be
amortized generally from two to three years;
|
|
|
unanticipated
costs or the incurrence of unknown liabilities;
|
|
|
the need to
manage more geographically-dispersed operations, such as Thawtes
offices in North Carolina and South Africa;
|
|
|
diversion of
managements resources from other business concerns;
|
|
|
the inability
to retain the employees of the acquired businesses;
|
|
|
adverse effects
on existing customer relationships of Thawte or Signio;
|
|
|
the difficulty
of assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired
businesses;
|
|
|
our inability
to incorporate acquired technologies successfully into our
Internet-based trust services; and
|
|
|
the inability
to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and
policies.
|
In addition, in March 2000, we
agreed to acquire Network Solutions. If this acquisition is consummated,
we could experience similar integration issues.
|
We must
manage our growth and expansion.
|
Our historical growth has
placed, and any further growth is likely to continue to place, a
significant strain on our resources. VeriSign has grown from 26
employees at December 31, 1995 to 394 employees at December 31, 1999. We
have also opened additional sales offices and have significantly
expanded our operations, both in the U.S. and abroad, during this time
period. We also expanded our operations by acquiring SecureIT during
1998 and both Thawte and Signio in February 2000 and we will expand
significantly if our proposed acquisition of Network Solutions is
completed. To be successful, we will need to implement additional
management information systems, develop further our operating,
administrative, financial and accounting systems and controls and
maintain close coordination among our executive, engineering,
accounting, finance, marketing, sales and operations organizations. Any
failure to manage growth effectively could materially harm our
business.
|
We must
establish and maintain strategic and other relationships with third
parties.
|
One of our significant
business strategies has been to enter into strategic or other similar
collaborative relationships in order to reach a larger customer base
than we could reach through our direct sales and marketing efforts. We
may need to enter into additional relationships to execute our business
plan. We may not be able to enter into additional, or maintain our
existing, strategic relationships on commercially reasonable terms. If
we failed, we would have to devote substantially more resources to the
distribution, sale and marketing of our Internet-based trust services
than we would otherwise. Furthermore, as a result of our emphasis on
these relationships, our success in these relationships will depend both
on the ultimate success of the other parties to these relationships,
particularly in the use and promotion of IP networks for trusted and
secure electronic commerce and communications, and on the ability of
these parties to market our Internet-based trust services successfully.
Failure of one or more of our strategic relationships to result in the
development and maintenance of a market for our Internet-based trust
services could materially harm our business.
Our existing relationships
do not, and any future relationships may not, afford VeriSign any
exclusive marketing or distribution rights. In addition, the other
parties may not view their relationships with us as significant for
their own businesses. Therefore, they could reduce their commitment to
VeriSign at any time in the future. These parties could also pursue
alternative technologies or develop alternative products and services
either on their own or in collaboration with others, including our
competitors. If we are unable to maintain our relationships or to enter
into additional relationships, our business could be materially harmed.
See Business Strategic Relationships and
Marketing, Sales and Distribution.
|
Certain of
our Internet-based trust services have lengthy sales and
implementation cycles.
|
We market many of our
Internet-based trust services directly to large companies and government
agencies. The sale and implementation of our services to these entities
typically involves a lengthy education process and a significant
technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources. This
process is also subject to the risk of delays associated with customers
internal budgeting and other procedures for approving large
capital expenditures, deploying new technologies within their networks
and testing and accepting new technologies that affect key operations.
As a result, the sales and implementation cycles associated with certain
of our Internet-based trust services can be lengthy, potentially lasting
from three to six months. Our quarterly and annual operating results
could be materially harmed if orders forecasted for a specific customer
for a particular quarter are not realized.
|
Our
international operations are subject to certain risks.
|
Revenues of VeriSign Japan
K.K., or VeriSign Japan, and revenues from other international
affiliates and customers accounted for approximately 27% of our revenues
in 1999. We intend to expand our international operations and
international sales and marketing activities. For example, with our
acquisition of Thawte we have additional operations in South Africa.
Expansion into these markets has required and will continue to require
significant management attention and resources. We may also need to
tailor our Internet-based trust services for a particular market and to
enter into international distribution and operating relationships. We
have limited experience in localizing our Internet-based trust services
and in developing international distribution or operating relationships.
We may not succeed in expanding our Internet-based trust service
offerings into international markets. Failure to do so could harm our
business. In addition, there are risks inherent in doing business on an
international basis, including, among others:
|
|
regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
legal
uncertainty regarding liability;
|
|
|
export and
import restrictions on cryptographic technology and products
incorporating that technology;
|
|
|
tariffs and
other trade barriers;
|
|
|
difficulties in
staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
longer sales
and payment cycles; problems in collecting accounts
receivable;
|
|
|
difficulty of
authenticating customer information;
|
|
|
seasonal
reductions in business activity; and
|
|
|
potentially
adverse tax consequences.
|
We have licensed to
international affiliates the VeriSign Processing Center platform, which
is designed to replicate our own secure data centers and allows the
affiliate to offer back-end processing of Internet-based trust services.
The VeriSign Processing Center platform provides an affiliate with the
knowledge and technology to offer Internet-based trust services similar
to those offered by VeriSign. It is critical to our business strategy
that the facilities and infrastructure used in issuing and marketing
digital certificates remain
secure and be perceived by the marketplace to be secure. Although we
provide the affiliate with training in security and trust practices,
network management and customer service and support, these practices are
performed by the affiliate and are outside of our control. Any failure
of an affiliate to maintain the privacy of confidential customer
information could result in negative publicity and therefore adversely
affect the markets perception of the security of our services as
well as the security of electronic commerce and communication over IP
networks generally. See System interruptions and security
breaches could harm our business and BusinessVeriSign
s Trust Services.
All of our international
revenues from sources other than VeriSign Japan are denominated in U.S.
dollars. If additional portions of our international revenues were to be
denominated in foreign currencies, we could become subject to increased
risks relating to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. See
Business Marketing, Sales and Distribution.
|
Acquisitions
could harm our business.
|
During 1998, we acquired
SecureIT and in February 2000, we acquired Thawte and Signio. In
addition, we agreed to acquire Network Solutions in March 2000. We may
acquire additional businesses, technologies, product lines or service
offerings in the future. Acquisitions involve a number of risks
including among others:
|
|
the difficulty
of assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired
businesses;
|
|
|
the potential
disruption of our business;
|
|
|
our inability
to integrate, train, retain and motivate key personnel of the acquired
business;
|
|
|
the diversion
of our management from our day-to-day operations;
|
|
|
our inability
to incorporate acquired technologies successfully into our
Internet-based trust services;
|
|
|
the additional
expense associated with completing an acquisition and amortizing any
acquired intangible assets;
|
|
|
the potential
impairment of relationships with our employees, customers and
strategic partners; and
|
|
|
the inability
to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and
policies.
|
If we are unable to
successfully address any of these risks, our business could be
materially harmed.
Year 2000
Issues
To date, we have experienced
no significant disruption of our operations nor have our customers
reported to us any significant problems with our products or services as
a result of Year 2000 issues.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments |
|
$156,480 |
|
$41,745 |
|
275 |
% |
Working
capital |
|
$140,163 |
|
$31,085 |
|
351 |
% |
Stockholders
equity |
|
$298,359 |
|
$40,728 |
|
633 |
% |
Prior to our initial public
offering, we financed our operations primarily through private sales of
equity securities, raising approximately $46.1 million. Our initial
public offering, which we completed in January 1998, yielded net
proceeds of approximately $43.7 million. In January 1999, we sold an
additional 6,390,000 shares of common stock to the public for net
proceeds of approximately $121.4 million. At December 31, 1999, our
principal source of liquidity was $156.5 million of cash, cash
equivalents and
short-term investments, consisting principally of commercial paper, medium
term corporate notes, corporate bonds and notes, market auction
securities, U.S. government and agency securities and money market
funds.
Net cash provided by operating
activities was $14.7 million in 1999, primarily as a result of net
income after adjustment for non-cash items such as depreciation and
amortization and cash provided by increased deferred revenue, which was
partially offset by increases in accounts receivable and other current
assets. Cash used in operating activities was $11.8 million in 1998 and
$12.8 million in 1997. Net cash used in operating activities in 1998 and
1997 was primarily the result of net losses and increases in accounts
receivable which were partially offset by non-cash charges and increases
in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred
revenue.
Net cash used in investing
activities was $103.2 million in 1999, $16.0 million in 1998 and $15.3
million in 1997. In 1999, net cash used in investing activities
primarily related to net purchases of short-term investments totaling
$67.0 million and an increase of $26.5 million in long-term investments.
In 1998 and 1997, net cash used in investing activities was primarily
the result of capital expenditures for computer and communications
equipment, purchased software, office equipment, furniture, fixtures and
leasehold improvements. In addition, cash used in investing activities
included net purchases of short-term investments of $11.0 million in
1998 and $8.0 million in 1997. Capital expenditures for property and
equipment totaled $6.0 million in 1999, $4.4 million in 1998 and $6.8
million in 1997. Our planned capital expenditures for 2000 are
approximately $6.0 million to $8.0 million, primarily for computer and
communications equipment and leasehold improvements. In addition, we are
currently implementing a new enterprise resource planning system, for
which we expect to expend approximately $4.0 million in 2000. As of
December 31, 1999, we also had commitments under noncancelable operating
leases for our facilities for various terms through 2005. See Note 8 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net cash provided by financing
activities was $136.2 million in 1999, $45.7 million in 1998 and $3.1
million in 1997. In 1999, we received net cash proceeds of $121.4
million from the public offering of our stock and in 1998, we received
net cash proceeds of $43.7 million from our initial public offering. In
addition, net cash provided by financing activities of VeriSign Japan
was $2.5 million in 1997, resulting from the sale of capital stock to
minority investors and from the proceeds of bank borrowings.
We believe that our existing
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to
meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the
foreseeable future. However, at some time, we may need to raise
additional funds through public or private financing, strategic
relationships or other arrangements. Such additional funding, if needed,
might not be available on terms attractive to us, or at all. If we have
to enter into strategic relationships to raise additional funds we might
be required to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies. Our
failure to raise capital when needed could materially harm our business.
If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity
securities, the percentage of our stock owned by our then-current
stockholders would be reduced. Furthermore, such equity securities might
have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common
stock.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1998, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133
establishes methods for derivative financial instruments and hedging
activities related to those instruments, as well as other hedging
activities. Because we do not currently hold any derivative instruments
and do not engage in hedging activities, we expect that the adoption of
SFAS No. 133 will not have a material impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. We will be required to implement
SFAS No 133, as amended, for the year ending December 31,
2001.
In December 1998, the AICPA
issued SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions. SOP No. 98-9
requires recognition of revenue using the residual method in
a multiple-element software arrangement when fair value does not exist
for one or more
of the delivered elements in the arrangement. Under the residual
method, the total fair value of the undelivered elements is
deferred and recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2. We will be
required to implement SOP No. 98-9 for the year ending December 31,
2000. SOP No. 98-9 also extended the deferral of the application of SOP
No. 97-2 to certain other multiple-element software arrangements through
our year ended December 31, 1999. We expect that the adoption of SOP No.
98-9 will not have a material impact on our financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate
sensitivity
The primary objective of
VeriSigns investment activities is to preserve principal while at
the same time maximizing the income we receive from our investments
without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we
have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change
in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the
investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was
issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the
prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our
investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, we maintain our
portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of
securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, corporate
bonds and notes, market auction securities, U.S. government and agency
securities and money market funds. In general, money market funds are
not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds
fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. In addition, we invest in
relatively short-term securities. As of December 31, 1999, 90% of our
non-strategic investments mature in less than one year. See Note 3 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents
the amounts of our cash equivalents and investments that are subject to
market risk by range of expected maturity and weighted-average interest
rates as of December 31, 1999. This table does not include money market
funds because those funds are not subject to market risk.
|
|
Maturing
in
|
|
|
Six
Months
or Less
|
|
Six
Months
to
One Year
|
|
More
than
One Year
|
|
Total
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands) |
Included in
cash and cash equivalents |
|
43,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,130 |
|
43,130 |
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
short-term investments |
|
52,669 |
|
|
33,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
86,635 |
|
86,098 |
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
5.70 |
% |
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
14,000 |
|
13,849 |
Weighted-average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Exchange rate
sensitivity
VeriSign considers its
exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal.
Our recently established subsidiary in Sweden has not had significant
operations to date. All revenues derived from our European affiliates
are denominated in U.S. dollars and, therefore, are not subject to
exchange rate fluctuations.
Both the revenues and expenses
of our majority-owned subsidiary in Japan are denominated in Japanese
yen. This serves as a natural hedge because although an unfavorable
change in the exchange rate of the Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar
will result in lower revenues when translated to U.S. dollars, operating
expenses will also be lower in these circumstances.
Because of our minimal
exposure to foreign currencies, we have not engaged in any hedging
transactions to date.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
Financial
Statements
VeriSigns financial
statements required by this item are submitted as a separate section of
this Form 10-K. See Item 14.(a)1 for a listing of financial statements
provided in the section titled FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
Supplemental
Data
The following tables set forth
quarterly supplementary data for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 1999 and reflect VeriSigns results as
restated to reflect our acquisition of SecureIT, Inc. in 1998, which was
accounted for as a pooling of interests. See Note 2 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year
Ended
December 31
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
June
30
|
|
September
30
|
|
December
31
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data) |
Revenues |
|
$15,582 |
|
|
$18,736 |
|
|
$22,782 |
|
|
$27,676 |
|
|
$84,776 |
|
Total costs and
expenses |
|
19,011 |
|
|
20,679 |
|
|
22,781 |
|
|
25,615 |
|
|
88,086 |
|
Operating
income (loss) |
|
(3,429 |
) |
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
1 |
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
(3,310 |
) |
Minority
interest in net loss of subsidiary |
|
250 |
|
|
178 |
|
|
294 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
836 |
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
(1,993 |
) |
|
(152 |
) |
|
1,567 |
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
3,955 |
|
Basic net
income (loss) per share |
|
(.02 |
) |
|
.00 |
|
|
.02 |
|
|
.04 |
|
|
.04 |
|
Diluted net
income (loss) per share |
|
(.02 |
) |
|
.00 |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
.04 |
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
December 31
|
|
|
March
31
|
|
June
30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data) |
Revenues |
|
$
6,662 |
|
|
$
8,552 |
|
|
$10,505 |
|
|
$13,211 |
|
|
$38,930 |
|
Total costs and
expenses |
|
12,146 |
|
|
14,322 |
|
|
19,087 |
|
|
16,520 |
|
|
62,075 |
|
Operating
loss |
|
(5,484 |
) |
|
(5,770 |
) |
|
(8,582 |
) |
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
(23,145 |
) |
Minority
interest in net loss of subsidiary |
|
389 |
|
|
324 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
332 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
Net
loss |
|
(4,703 |
) |
|
(4,789 |
) |
|
(7,717 |
) |
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
(19,743 |
) |
Basic net
income (loss) per share |
|
(.07 |
) |
|
(.05 |
) |
|
(.09 |
) |
|
(.03 |
) |
|
(.24 |
) |
Diluted net
income (loss) per share |
|
(.07 |
) |
|
(.05 |
) |
|
(.09 |
) |
|
(.03 |
) |
|
(.24 |
) |
Our quarterly operating
results have varied and may fluctuate significantly in the future as a
result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control.
These factors include the following:
|
|
continued
market acceptance of our Internet-based trust services;
|
|
|
the long sales
and implementation cycles for, and potentially large order sizes of,
certain of our Internet-based trust services;
|
|
|
the timing and
execution of individual contracts;
|
|
|
customer
renewal rates for our Internet-based trust services;
|
|
|
the timing of
releases of new versions of Internet browsers or other third-party
software products and networking equipment which include our digital
certificate service interface technology;
|
|
|
the mix of our
services sold during a quarter;
|
|
|
our success in
marketing other Internet-based trust services to our existing
customers and to new customers;
|
|
|
continued
development of our direct and indirect distribution channels, both in
the U.S. and abroad;
|
|
|
market
acceptance of our Internet-based trust services or our competitors
products and services;
|
|
|
our ability to
attract, integrate, train, retain and motivate a substantial number of
sales and marketing, research and development and technical support
personnel;
|
|
|
our ability to
expand our operations;
|
|
|
our success in
assimilating the operations and personnel of SecureIT and any other
acquired businesses;
|
|
|
amortization of
goodwill and intangible assets from acquisitions;
|
|
|
other
acquisition-related expenses;
|
|
|
the amount and
timing of expenditures related to expansion of our
operations;
|
|
|
the impact of
price changes in our Internet-based trust services or our competitors
products and services; and
|
|
|
general global
economic conditions and economic conditions specific to IP network
industries.
|
Our limited operating history
and the emerging nature of our market make it difficult to predict
future revenues. Our expenses are based, in part, on our expectations
regarding future revenues, and are largely fixed in nature, particularly
in the short term. We may be unable to predict our future revenues
accurately or to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for
any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant shortfall
of revenues in relation to our expectations could cause significant
declines in our quarterly operating results.
Due to all of the foregoing
factors, our quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to
forecast. Therefore, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our
operating results will not necessarily be meaningful, and you should not
rely upon them as an indication of our future performance. Also, it is
likely that our operating results will fall below our expectations and
the expectations of securities analysts or investors in some future
quarter. In such event, the market price of our common stock could be
materially adversely affected.
Proceeds from
Public Offering
In January 1998, VeriSign
completed the initial public offering of its common stock. The managing
underwriters in the offering were Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated,
Hambrecht & Quist LLC and Wessels, Arnold & Henderson L.L.C. We
realized net proceeds from the offering of approximately $43.7 million
after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses
of the offering. Through December 31, 1999, we used approximately $14.9
million of the net proceeds from the offering to fund operating
expenses, the transaction charges related to the acquisition of SecureIT
and increased working capital. Approximately $10.4 million of the net
proceeds was used to purchase and install computers and peripheral
equipment and leasehold improvements and approximately $12.9 million was
used to invest in certain companies as long-term investments. The
remaining $5.5 million has been invested in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment grade securities.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
There were no disagreements on
any matter of accounting principles, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure to be reported under this item.
PART
III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information with respect to
this item may be found in the section captioned Directors and
Executive Officers of the Registrant appearing in the definitive
Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection with the
2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such information is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information with respect to
this item may be found in the section captioned Executive
Compensation appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement to be
delivered to stockholders in connection with VeriSigns 2000 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
Information with respect to
this item may be found in the section captioned Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management appearing in the
definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders in connection
with the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such information is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Information with respect to
this item may be found in the section captioned Certain
Transactions appearing in the definitive Proxy Statement to be
delivered to stockholders in connection with the 2000 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
PART
IV
ITEM 14.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULE AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K
(a) Documents filed
as part of this report
Management
s Report |
|
|
Independent Auditors Report |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997 |
|
|
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
2.
Financial statement schedules
|
|
|
Financial
statement schedules are omitted because the information called for is
not required or is shown in either in the consolidated financial
statements or the notes thereto.
|
(a) Index to
Exhibits
|
|
Incorporated
by
Reference
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
Form
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
2.01 |
|
Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization dated as of July 6, 1998 by
and between the Registrant, VeriSign Merger Corp., SecureIT and
the shareholders of SecureIT |
|
8-K |
|
7/6/98 |
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization dated as of December 17,
1999 by and among the Registrant, Signio, Inc. and BEHAD
Acquisition Corp. |
|
8-K |
|
3/7/00 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
2.03 |
|
Exchange
Agreement dated as of December 17, 1999 by and
between the Registrant and Mark Shuttleworth |
|
8-K |
|
2/16/00 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
Agreement and
Plan of Reorganization dated as of March 6, 2000 by
and among the Registrant, Nickel Acquisition Corporation and
Network Solutions, Inc. |
|
8-K |
|
3/8/00 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
Third Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
|
Amended and
Restated Bylaws of the Registrant |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
3.04 |
|
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
Amendment to
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant |
|
S-8 |
|
7/15/99 |
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
Investors
Rights Agreement, dated November 15, 1996, among the
Registrant and the parties indicated therein |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
Incorporated
by
Reference
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
Form
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
4.04 |
|
First Amendment
to Amended and Restated Investors Rights
Agreement dated as of July 7, 1998 by and between the Registrant
and certain stockholders of the Registrant |
|
8-K |
|
7/6/98 |
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of July 6, 1998by and
between the Registrant and the former shareholders of
SecureIT |
|
S-8 |
|
7/7/98 |
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of December 19, 1999 by
and between the Registrant and the Mark Shuttleworth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
10.01 |
|
Registrant
s 1998 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
S-8 |
|
7/15/99 |
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
10.02 |
|
Registrant
s 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
S-8 |
|
7/15/99 |
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
|
10.03 |
|
Form of
Non-Plan Stock Option for options granted to certain non-
executive officer employees |
|
S-8 |
|
7/15/99 |
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
|
10.05 |
|
Form of
Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Registrant
with each of its directors and executive officers |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.05 |
|
|
|
|
10.06 |
|
Registrant
s 1995 Stock Option Plan and related documents |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.06 |
|
|
|
|
10.07 |
|
Registrant
s 1997 Stock Option Plan |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.07 |
|
|
|
|
10.08 |
|
Registrant
s 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan and related
documents |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
Registrant
s 1998 Equity Incentive Plan and related documents |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
Registrant
s 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and related
documents |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.10 |
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
Registrant
s Executive Loan Program of 1996 |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
Form of Full
Recourse Secured Promissory Note and Form of Pledge
and Security Agreement entered into between the Registrant and
certain executive officers |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.14 |
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
Assignment
Agreement, dated April 19,1995 between the Registrant
and RSA Data Security, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.15 |
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
BSAFE/TIPEM OEM
Master License Agreement, dated April 18,
1995, between the Registrant and RSA Data Security, Inc., as
amended |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
Non-Compete and
Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated April 18,
1995, between the Registrant and RSA Security, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.17 |
|
|
|
|
10.18* |
|
Microsoft/VeriSign Certificate Technology Preferred Provider
Agreement, effective as of May 1, 1997, between the Registrant and
Microsoft Corporation |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.18 |
|
|
|
|
10.19* |
|
Master
Development and License Agreement, dated September 30,
1997, between the Registrant and Security Dynamics Technologies,
Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.19 |
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
License
Agreement, dated December 16, 1996, between the
Registrant and veriSign Japan K.K. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
|
Incorporated
by
Reference
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
|
Form
|
|
Date
|
|
Number
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
10.21 |
|
Loan Agreement,
dated January 30, 1997, between the Registrant
and Venture Lending & Leasing, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.21 |
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
Security
Agreement, dated January 30, 1997, between the Registrant
and Venture Lending & Leasing, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
|
10.23* |
|
VeriSign
Private Label Agreement, dated April 2, 1996, between the
Registrant and VISA International Service Association |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.23 |
|
|
|
|
10.24* |
|
VeriSign
Private Label Agreement dated October 3, 1996, between
the Registrant and VISA International Service Association |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.24 |
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
Lease
Agreement, dated August 15, 1996, between the Registrant
and Shoreline Investments VII |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.25 |
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
Lease
Agreement, dated September 18, 1996, between the Registrant
and Shore-line Investments VII |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.26 |
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
Sublease
Agreement, dated September 5, 1996, between the
Registrant and Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.27 |
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
Employment
Offer Letter Agreement, between the Registrant and
Stratton Sclavos, dated June 12, 1995, as amended October 4,
1995 |
|
S-1 |
|
1/29/98 |
|
10.28 |
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
Amendment
Number One to Master Development and License
Agreement dated as of December 31, 1998 between the Registrant
and Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/5/99 |
|
10.30 |
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
Amendment
Number Two to BSAFE/TIPEM OEM Master License
Agreement dated as of December 31, 1998 between the Registrant
and RSA Data Security, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/5/99 |
|
10.31 |
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
Sublease dated
as of September 25, 1998 between the Registrant and
Silicon Graphics, Inc. |
|
S-1 |
|
1/5/99 |
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
|
21.01 |
|
Subsidiaries of
the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
23.01 |
|
Consent of KPMG
LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
27.01 |
|
Financial Data
Schedule (in EDGAR version only) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
*
|
Confidential
treatment was received with respect to certain portions of this
agreement. Such portions were omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
(b) Reports on
Form 8-K
|
No reports on Form 8-K
were filed in the quarter ended December 31, 1999.
|
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Mountain View, State of California, on
the 17th day of March 2000.
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE
PRESENTS that each individual whose signature appears below constitutes
and appoints Stratton D. Sclavos, Dana L. Evan and Timothy Tomlinson,
and each of them, his or her true lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution, for him or her and in his or her name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granted unto said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intends and purposes as he or she
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his, her or their
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
In accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacities indicated on the 17th day of March 2000.
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
/s/
STRATTON
D. SCLAVOS
Stratton
D. Sclavos
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
/s/
DANA
L. EVAN
Dana L.
Evan |
|
Executive Vice
President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
/s/
D. JAMES
BIDZOS
D. James
Bidzos |
|
Chairman of the
Board |
|
|
/s/
WILLIAM
CHENEVICH
William
Chenevich |
|
Director |
|
|
/s/
KEVIN
R. COMPTON
Kevin R.
Compton |
|
Director |
|
|
/s/
DAVID
J. COWAN
David J.
Cowan |
|
Director |
|
|
/s/
TIMOTHY
TOMLINSON
Timothy
Tomlinson |
|
Director and
Secretary |
The following trademarks and
service marks of VeriSign, Inc., which may be registered in certain
jurisdictions, may be referenced in this Form 10-K:
Trademarks
|
VeriSign Processing
Center
|
|
VeriSign is a
registered trademark exclusively licensed to VeriSign,
Inc.
|
Service
Marks
|
The Internet Trust
Company
SM
|
|
The Sign of Trust on
the Net
SM
|
|
VeriSign Trust
Network
SM
|
All other brand or product
names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective
holders.
As required under Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, the consolidated financial
statements of the Company are provided in this separate section. The
consolidated financial statements included in this section are as
follows:
VeriSigns management is
responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the
consolidated financial statements and other financial information
presented in this report. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles and reflect the effects of certain estimates and
judgments made by management.
VeriSigns management
maintains an effective system of internal control that is designed to
provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and
transactions are properly recorded and executed in accordance with
managements authorization. The system is continuously monitored by
direct management review. VeriSign selects and trains qualified people
who are provided with and expected to adhere to our standards of
business conduct. These standards, which set forth the highest
principles of business ethics and conduct, are a key element of our
control system.
VeriSigns consolidated
financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, independent
auditors. Their audits were conducted in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards, and included a review of financial controls
and tests of accounting records and procedures as they considered
necessary in the circumstances.
The Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors, which consists of outside directors, meets regularly
with management and the independent auditors to review accounting,
reporting, auditing and internal control matters. The committee has
direct and private access to both internal and external
auditors.
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Executive
Vice President of
|
|
Finance and
Administration and
|
Mountain View,
California
January 14,
2000
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of
Directors and Stockholders of VeriSign, Inc.:
We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VeriSign, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity,
comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1999. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of VeriSign, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Mountain View,
California
January 14,
2000
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands,
except share data)
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
ASSETS
|
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents |
|
$
70,382 |
|
|
$
22,786 |
|
Short-term
investments |
|
86,098 |
|
|
18,959 |
|
Accounts receivable,
net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,108 in 1999 and
$517 in 1998 |
|
22,727 |
|
|
9,769 |
|
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets |
|
3,635 |
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
assets |
|
182,842 |
|
|
53,688 |
|
Property and
equipment, net |
|
10,194 |
|
|
9,234 |
|
Long-term
investments |
|
144,751 |
|
|
436 |
|
Other assets,
net |
|
3,379 |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
341,166 |
|
|
$
64,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current
liabilities: |
Accounts
payable |
|
$
4,665 |
|
|
$
5,472 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
6,237 |
|
|
4,035 |
|
Deferred
revenue |
|
31,777 |
|
|
13,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
42,679 |
|
|
22,603 |
|
Minority
interest in subsidiary |
|
128 |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
Stockholders
equity: |
Preferred stock
par value $.001 per share |
|
|
|
Authorized shares:
5,000,000 |
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding
shares: none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockpar
value $.001 per share |
Authorized shares:
200,000,000 |
Issued and outstanding
shares: 103,482,841 at December 31, 1999 92,346,768 at
December 31, 1998 |
|
103 |
|
|
92 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
258,239 |
|
|
92,728 |
|
Notes
receivable from stockholders |
|
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
Unearned
compensation |
|
(172 |
) |
|
(276 |
) |
Accumulated
deficit |
|
(47,452 |
) |
|
(51,407 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
|
87,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders
equity |
|
298,359 |
|
|
40,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
341,166 |
|
|
$
64,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Revenues |
|
$
84,776 |
|
|
$
38,930 |
|
|
$
13,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and
expenses: |
Cost of
revenues |
|
31,898 |
|
|
19,454 |
|
|
9,689 |
|
Sales and
marketing |
|
34,145 |
|
|
22,943 |
|
|
11,826 |
|
Research and
development |
|
13,303 |
|
|
8,435 |
|
|
5,303 |
|
General and
administrative |
|
8,740 |
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
5,039 |
|
Special
charges |
|
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and
expenses |
|
88,086 |
|
|
62,075 |
|
|
34,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss |
|
(3,310 |
) |
|
(23,145 |
) |
|
(21,301 |
) |
Interest
income |
|
7,365 |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
1,235 |
|
Other expense,
net |
|
(936 |
) |
|
(160 |
) |
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)
before minority interest |
|
3,119 |
|
|
(21,025 |
) |
|
(20,127 |
) |
Minority
interest in net loss of subsidiary |
|
836 |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
1,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$
3,955 |
|
|
$(19,743 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) per share: |
Basic |
|
$
.04 |
|
|
$
(.24 |
) |
|
$
(.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$
.03 |
|
|
$
(.24 |
) |
|
$
(.65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in
per share computation: |
Basic |
|
100,531 |
|
|
83,492 |
|
|
28,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
114,610 |
|
|
83,492 |
|
|
28,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands,
except share data)
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Preferred
stock: |
|
|
Balance, beginning of
year: |
|
|
No shares at January 1,
1999 |
|
|
40,124,024 shares at January
1, 1998 |
|
|
40,124,024 shares at January
1, 1997 |
|
$
|
|
$40 |
|
|
$
40 |
Conversion of
preferred stock to common stock (40,124,024) shares in 1998 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year: |
No shares at December 31,
1999 |
|
|
No shares at December 31,
1998 |
|
|
40,124,024 shares at
December 31, 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock: |
Balance, beginning of
year: |
92,346,768 shares at January
1, 1999 |
|
|
35,145,704 shares at January
1, 1998 |
|
|
31,439,848 shares at January
1, 1997 |
|
92 |
|
36 |
|
|
32 |
Issuance of common
stock: |
81,600 shares in
1998 |
|
|
487,232 shares in
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock for litigation settlement: |
1,000,000 shares in
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Issuance of common
stock for preferred provider agreement: |
400,000 shares in
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Issuance of common
stock through public offerings: |
6,390,000 shares in
1999 |
|
|
13,800,000 shares in
1998 |
|
6 |
|
13 |
|
|
|
Conversion of
preferred stock to common stock: |
40,124,024 shares in
1998 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock under employee stock purchase plan: |
547,896 shares in
1999 |
|
|
232,900 shares in
1998 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common
stock options: |
4,198,177 shares in
1999 |
|
|
2,962,540 shares in
1998 |
|
|
2,131,124 shares in
1997 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
Repurchase of common
stock: |
(312,500) shares in
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year: |
103,482,841 shares at
December 31, 1999 |
|
|
92,346,768 shares at
December 31, 1998 |
|
|
35,145,704 shares at
December 31, 1997 |
|
103 |
|
92 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY(Continued)
(In thousands,
except share data)
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Additional
paid-in capital: |
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of
year |
|
$
92,728 |
|
|
$
45,360 |
|
|
$
41,272 |
|
Issuance of common
stock |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
643 |
|
Issuance of common
stock for litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
Issuance of common
stock for preferred provider agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800 |
|
Issuance of common
stock through public offerings, net of offering
expenses of $7,239 in 1999 and $4,561 in
1998 |
|
121,354 |
|
|
43,729 |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common
stock under employee stock purchase plan |
|
1,989 |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
|
Unearned compensation
related to common stock options |
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
414 |
|
Repurchase of common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Income tax benefit
from exercise of employee stock options |
|
29,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
12,390 |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year |
|
258,239 |
|
|
92,728 |
|
|
45,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
receivable from stockholders: |
Balance, beginning of
year |
|
(409 |
) |
|
(644 |
) |
|
(543 |
) |
Loans to stockholders
to purchase stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Repurchase of common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Payments on notes
receivable |
|
409 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year |
|
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
compensation: |
Balance, beginning of
year |
|
(276 |
) |
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense related to stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
Amortization of
stock-based compensation |
|
104 |
|
|
104 |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year |
|
(172 |
) |
|
(276 |
) |
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit: |
Balance, beginning of
year |
|
(51,407 |
) |
|
(30,871 |
) |
|
(12,282 |
) |
Net income
(loss) |
|
3,955 |
|
|
(19,743 |
) |
|
(18,589 |
) |
Subchapter S
distributions of SecureIT, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year |
|
(47,452 |
) |
|
(51,407 |
) |
|
(30,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income: |
Balance, beginning of
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
investments, net of tax |
|
87,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of
year |
|
87,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders equity |
|
$298,359 |
|
|
$
40,728 |
|
|
$
13,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In
thousands)
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$
3,955 |
|
$(19,743 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
Other
comprehensive income: |
Unrealized gain on
investments, net of tax |
|
87,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
$91,596 |
|
$(19,743 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
thousands)
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Cash flows from
operating activities: |
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$
3,955 |
|
|
$(19,743 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
Adjustments to
reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
Special charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
5,404 |
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
2,621 |
|
Minority interest in net
loss of subsidiary |
|
(836 |
) |
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
(1,538 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation |
|
104 |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
34 |
|
Loss on disposal of property
and equipment |
|
381 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
63 |
|
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities: |
Accounts
receivable |
|
(12,958 |
) |
|
(6,379 |
) |
|
(2,628 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets |
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
(208 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
(807 |
) |
|
1,968 |
|
|
1,036 |
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
2,202 |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
250 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
18,681 |
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
14,665 |
|
|
(11,830 |
) |
|
(12,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities: |
Purchases of
short-term investments |
|
(132,238 |
) |
|
(63,383 |
) |
|
(11,209 |
) |
Maturities and sales
of short-term investments |
|
65,099 |
|
|
52,375 |
|
|
3,258 |
|
Purchases of long-term
investments |
|
(26,896 |
) |
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
Purchases of property
and equipment |
|
(6,019 |
) |
|
(4,413 |
) |
|
(6,823 |
) |
Other
assets |
|
(3,168 |
) |
|
(119 |
) |
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing
activities |
|
(103,222 |
) |
|
(15,976 |
) |
|
(15,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities: |
Proceeds from bank
borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
Repayment of bank
borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,678 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance
of common stock, net of repurchases |
|
135,744 |
|
|
46,208 |
|
|
771 |
|
Collections on notes
receivable from stockholders |
|
409 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
5 |
|
Subchapter S
distributions by SecureIT, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
Issuance of capital
stock by subsidiary to minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities |
|
136,153 |
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
3,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
47,596 |
|
|
17,844 |
|
|
(25,064 |
) |
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of year |
|
22,786 |
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
30,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of year |
|
$
70,382 |
|
|
$
22,786 |
|
|
$
4,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow disclosures: |
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing
activities: |
|
|
|
Issuance of notes
receivable collateralized by common stock |
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
from exercise of stock options |
|
$
29,778 |
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
investments, net of tax |
|
$
87,641 |
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income
taxes |
|
$
698 |
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
VERISIGN,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 1.
Description of Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
VeriSign, Inc. was
incorporated in Delaware in April 1995 when RSA Data Security, Inc. (
RSA) contributed equipment, other assets and technology for
common stock. This transfer of nonmonetary assets was recorded at the
founders historical cost basis. VeriSign provides Internet-based
trust services needed by websites, enterprises and individuals to
conduct trusted and secure electronic commerce and communications over
the Internet, intranets and extranets (IP Networks).
VeriSign provides both public and private certificate authority services
to organizations needing digital certificates for website
authentication, intranet and extranet access control, electronic
commerce services and virtual private network connections.
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of VeriSign and its
subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany accounts and
transactions. As of December 31, 1999, VeriSign owned approximately
50.5% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of its subsidiary,
VeriSign Japan K.K. Changes in VeriSigns proportionate share of
the net assets of VeriSign Japan resulting from sales of capital stock
by the subsidiary are accounted for as equity transactions.
|
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The functional currency for
VeriSigns international subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar; however,
the subsidiaries books of record are maintained in local currency. As a
result, the subsidiaries financial statements are remeasured into
U.S. dollars using a combination of current and historical exchange
rates and any transaction gains and losses are included in operating
results.
|
Cash, Cash
Equivalents, and Short and Long-Term Investments
|
VeriSign considers all highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date
of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include
money market funds, commercial paper, market auction securities, and
various deposit accounts.
VeriSigns investments
are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair
value based on quoted market prices. These investments consist of
commercial paper, medium term notes, U.S. government and agency
securities and corporate bonds and notes. These investments with
original maturities greater than three months and less than twelve
months are considered short-term investments and those with original
maturities greater than twelve months are considered long-term
investments. Realized gains and losses upon sale or maturity of these
investments are determined using the specific identification
method.
VeriSign invests in equity
instruments of privately-held, technology companies for business and
strategic purposes. These investments are included in long-term
investments and are accounted for under the cost method. For these
non-quoted investments, VeriSigns policy is to regularly review
the assumptions underlying the operating performance and cash flow
forecasts in assessing the carrying values. VeriSign identifies and
records impairment losses on long-lived assets when events and
circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. To date, no
such impairment has been recorded. During 1999, one of these investments
in Keynote Systems, Inc., became a marketable equity security when
Keynote Systems, Inc. completed their initial public offering. This
investment is subject to significant fluctuations in fair market value
due to the volatility of the stock market, and is recorded in long-term
investments.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Property and equipment are
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets, generally three to five years.
In March 1998, the AICPA
issued SOP 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software
Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. SOP 98-1 requires that
entities capitalize certain costs related to internal-use software once
certain criteria have been met. The Company implemented SOP 98-1 for the
year ended December 31, 1999.
Revenues from our services
consist of fees for the issuance of digital certificates, fees for
digital certificate service provisioning, fees for technology and
business process licensing to affiliates and fees for consulting,
implementation, training, support and maintenance services. Each of
these sources of revenue has different revenue recognition methods. We
defer revenues from the sale or renewal of digital certificates and
recognize these revenues ratably over the life of the digital
certificate, generally 12 months. We defer revenues from the sale of our
OnSite managed services and recognize these revenues ratably over the
term of the license, generally 12 months. We recognize revenues from the
sale of digital certificate technology and business process licensing to
affiliates upon delivery of the technology and signing of an agreement,
provided the fee is fixed and determinable, collectibility is probable
and the arrangement does not require significant production,
modification or customization of the software. We recognize revenues
from consulting and training services using the percentage-of-completion
method for fixed-fee development arrangements or as the services are
provided for time-and-materials arrangements. We recognize revenues
ratably over the term of the agreement for support and maintenance
services.
VeriSign recognizes revenue in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) No.
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. SOP No. 97-2 generally
requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple
elements to be allocated to each element based on its relative fair
value. The fair value of the element must be based on objective evidence
that is specific to the vendor. If a vendor does not have objective
evidence of the fair value of all elements in a multiple-element
arrangement, all revenue from the arrangement must be deferred until
such evidence exists or until all elements have been
delivered.
|
Research and
Development Costs
|
Research and development costs
are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred subsequent to establishing
technological feasibility, in the form of a working model, are
capitalized and amortized over their estimated useful lives. To date,
software development costs incurred after technological feasibility has
been established have not been material.
Advertising expense is charged
to operations as incurred. Advertising expense was $3,037,000 in 1999,
$1,858,000 in 1998 and $197,000 in 1997.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
VeriSign uses the asset and
liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable
to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected
to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A
valuation allowance is recorded for deferred tax assets whose
realization is not sufficiently likely.
VeriSign accounts for its
equity-based compensation plan using the intrinsic value
method.
|
Net Income
(Loss) Per Share
|
Basic net income (loss) per
share is computed using the weighted average number of outstanding
shares of common stock. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed
using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
plus the dilutive effect of stock options computed using the treasury
stock method and convertible securities using the if-converted
method.
The following table presents
the calculation for the number of shares used in the basic and diluted
net income (loss) per share computations:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Shares used to
compute basic net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
Weighted average
shares outstanding |
|
100,531 |
|
83,492 |
|
28,484 |
Dilutive stock
options |
|
14,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used to
compute diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
114,610 |
|
83,492 |
|
28,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 1999, VeriSign excluded
from the calculation of diluted net income per share 481,320 shares
related to stock options with an exercise price higher than $49.70, the
weighted average fair market value for the year. For 1998 and 1997,
VeriSign excluded all convertible preferred stock and outstanding stock
options from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because these
securities would have been anti-dilutive for these periods. The excluded
shares totaled 16,516,368 shares for 1998 and 50,495,180 shares for
1997.
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income
(loss) includes gains and losses that are not included in net income
(loss) but instead are recorded directly in stockholders equity.
Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains (losses) on
investments.
|
Concentration of Credit Risk
|
Financial instruments that
potentially subject VeriSign to significant concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short and long-term
investments and accounts receivable. VeriSign
maintains its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments with high
quality financial institutions and, as part of its cash management
process, performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing
of these financial institutions. VeriSign also performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers and, generally, requires no collateral.
VeriSign maintains an allowance for potential credit losses. Amounts
added to the allowance for doubtful accounts through charges to bad debt
expense totaled $859,000 in 1999, $590,000 in 1998 and $387,000 in 1997.
Uncollectible amounts written off totaled $268,000 in 1999, $359,000 in
1998 and $136,000 in 1997.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
During 1998, VeriSign signed a
joint venture agreement with certain companies located in France to form
Certplus, a provider of Internet trust services. VeriSign has a minority
interest of 15% in the joint venture, and therefore has accounted for
this as a long-term investment. Certplus is an affiliate in the VeriSign
affiliate program. Certplus accounted for approximately 1% of revenues
in 1999 and less than 1% of revenues in 1998 and 1997. Certplus
accounted for 1% of the accounts receivable balance as of December 31,
1999 and 2% of the accounts receivable balance as of December 31,
1998.
In February 1999, VeriSign
entered into a memorandum of understanding with Keynote Systems.
VeriSign is a 7% shareholder of Keynote as of December 31, 1999 and
Stratton Sclavos, president and chief executive officer is a member of
Keynotes board of directors. Under the agreement, VeriSign
received from Keynote a non-exclusive license to sell two versions of
Keynotes services as an integrated part of VeriSigns product
offerings. Per the agreement, VeriSign will pay a fee to Keynote for
each of these introductory services sold to a customer. In the event
that Keynote converts the introductory customer into a paying customer
within a certain timeframe, then Keynote will pay VeriSign a one-time
bounty fee for each customer. Through December 31, 1999, VeriSign has
received $20,000 in revenue and has paid Keynote approximately $250,000
under this agreement.
VeriSign entered into a
development agreement in September 1997 with RSA Security, formerly
Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc. (RSA Security), the
parent company of RSA, an approximately 5% stockholder of VeriSign at
December 31, 1999, to develop a customized certificate authority product
in order to enable RSA Security to offer a product with encryption and
digital certificate authority functionality. In December 1998, VeriSign
and RSA Security amended the development agreement to grant RSA Security
an exclusive license to incorporate the developed technology into
original equipment manufacturers (OEM) products in
order to create products incorporating the technology and to sublicense
the technology to licensees of the OEMs.
The development agreement
provides that RSA Security pay VeriSign an aggregate of $2.7 million as
an initial license fee, of which $.9 million was paid in October 1997,
$1.4 million was paid during 1998 and $.4 million was paid during 1999.
At the time of the execution of the amendment in December 1998, RSA
Security paid VeriSign $500,000. Once RSA Security has received net
revenues of $2.8 million from OEMs, it will pay VeriSign a royalty equal
to the greater of 18% of net revenues from the sale to OEMs or 18% of
60% of the current list price for the product. RSA Security will not be
obligated to pay any royalties to VeriSign with respect to sales to
value-added resellers.
In order for RSA Security to
maintain its exclusivity rights, it must make certain minimum aggregate
annual payments to VeriSign, which are payable on a quarterly basis. In
addition, VeriSign will be obligated to pay RSA Security an amount equal
to 8% of net revenue recognized by VeriSign during a VeriSign OnSite
customers first year using VeriSign OnSite if the customer had
previously purchased products from RSA Security that incorporate the
developed technology.
Beginning in March 1998, RSA
Security is required to pay VeriSign a monthly product support fee for a
three-year period and thereafter for successive annual terms. For a
yearly fee, RSA Security can purchase product maintenance services. RSA
Security paid both support and maintenance fees aggregating $210,000 in
1999 and $105,000 in 1998.
Revenue from the development
agreement accounted for less than 1% of revenues in 1999, 6% of revenues
in 1998 and 4% of revenues in 1997.
In July 1999, VeriSign entered
into a non-exclusive reseller agreement with RSA Security to grant RSA
Security the right to resell certain VeriSign products and services for
a discounted fee. Revenue from the reseller agreement accounted for 1%
of revenues in 1999.
At December 31, 1999, VeriSign
had no customers that accounted for more than 10% of accounts
receivable. At December 31, 1998, VeriSign had one customer, a South
African systems integrator, that accounted for 18% of accounts
receivable. VeriSign had one customer that accounted for 10% of revenues
in 1997 and no other customers that accounted for more than 10% of
revenues in 1999 or 1998. VeriSign had no other customers that accounted
for more than 10% of accounts receivable for any of the dates or years
presented.
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
VeriSign reviews long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by comparison of the
carrying amount to future net cash flows the assets are expected to
generate. If assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
long-lived asset exceeds its fair market value. To date, no adjustments
to the carrying value of long-lived assets have been
required.
The preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In June 1998 the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 133 established
methods of accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging
activities related to those instruments as well as other hedging
activities. Because it currently holds no derivative instruments and
does not engage in hedging activities, VeriSign expects that the
adoption of SFAS No. 133 will have no material impact on its financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. VeriSign will be required
to implement SFAS No. 133, as amended, for the year ending December 31,
2001.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
In December 1998, the AICPA
issued SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions. SOP No. 98-9
requires recognition of revenue using the residual method in
a multiple-element software arrangement when fair value does not exist
for one or more of the delivered elements in the arrangement. Under the
residual method, the total fair value of the undelivered
elements is deferred and recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2.
VeriSign will be required to implement SOP No. 98-9 for the year ending
December 31, 2000. SOP No. 98-9 also extended the deferral of the
application of SOP No. 97-2 to certain other multiple-element software
arrangements through the year ended December 31, 1999. We expect that
the adoption of SOP No. 98-9 will not have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 2.
Business Combination
In July 1998, VeriSign
completed a merger with SecureIT, Inc. (SecureIT). SecureIT
is a provider of Internet and enterprise security solutions comprising a
full range of products and services to assist clients with assessing,
designing and implementing security solutions. The merger was effected
by exchanging approximately 6,664,000 shares of VeriSign common stock
for all of the outstanding common stock of SecureIT. Each share of
SecureIT was exchanged for 0.164806 of one share of VeriSign common
stock. In addition, outstanding SecureIT employee stock options were
converted at the same exchange ratio into options to purchase
approximately 760,000 shares of VeriSign common stock.
The merger constituted a
tax-free reorganization and has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests. Accordingly, all prior period financial statements
have been restated to include the combined results of operations,
financial position and cash flows of SecureIT as if it had always been a
part of VeriSign. There were no intercompany transactions between
VeriSign and SecureIT prior to the combination that required elimination
and there were no material adjustments required to conform SecureIT
s accounting policies to those of VeriSign. Direct costs and other
related merger costs of approximately $3.6 million were incurred in
connection with the acquisition (see Note 9).
The results of operations
previously reported by the separate companies and the combined amounts
presented in the consolidated financial statements are summarized
below.
|
|
Six Months
Ended
June 30,
1998
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
1997
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Revenues: |
VeriSign, Inc.
|
|
$
9,303 |
|
|
$
9,382 |
|
SecureIT, Inc.
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
$
15,214 |
|
|
$
13,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss): |
VeriSign, Inc.
|
|
$(10,092 |
) |
|
$(19,195 |
) |
SecureIT, Inc.
|
|
600 |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
$
(9,492 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 3.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short and Long-Term
Investments
All cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and marketable long-term investments have been
classified as available-for-sale securities and consist of the
following:
|
|
As of
December 31, 1999
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Classified as
current assets: |
|
|
Cash |
|
$
22,645 |
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
22,645 |
Commercial
paper |
|
57,243 |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
57,263 |
Corporate bonds and
notes |
|
28,349 |
|
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
28,004 |
Money market
funds |
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,602 |
Medium term corporate
notes |
|
23,276 |
|
1 |
|
(100 |
) |
|
23,177 |
Market auction
securities |
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
U.S. government and
agency securities |
|
15,876 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,991 |
|
21 |
|
(532 |
) |
|
156,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
70,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
86,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified as
non-current assets: |
Equity
securities |
|
12,925 |
|
117,977 |
|
|
|
|
130,902 |
U.S. government and
agency securities |
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,925 |
|
117,977 |
|
(151 |
) |
|
144,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and
securities |
|
$183,916 |
|
$117,998 |
|
$(683 |
) |
|
$301,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31, 1998
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Classified as
current assets: |
|
|
Cash |
|
$
3,619 |
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
3,619 |
Commercial
paper |
|
21,451 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
21,457 |
Corporate bonds and
notes |
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
5,023 |
Money market
funds |
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600 |
Medium term corporate
notes |
|
4,049 |
|
2 |
|
(5 |
) |
|
4,046 |
Market auction
securities |
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,750 |
|
8 |
|
(13 |
) |
|
41,745 |
Included in
cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$22,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$18,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classified as
non-current assets: |
Equity
securities |
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and
securities |
|
$42,186 |
|
$
8 |
|
$
(13 |
) |
|
$42,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains and
losses on investments were not material for any of the periods
presented.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 4.
Balance Sheet Detail
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
|
Property and
equipment, net |
|
|
|
Computer
equipment and purchased software |
|
$
15,231 |
|
$11,402 |
Office
equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
2,438 |
|
1,774 |
Leasehold
improvements |
|
3,996 |
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,665 |
|
16,312 |
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
11,471 |
|
7,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
10,194 |
|
$
9,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities |
|
|
|
Employee
compensation |
|
$
3,878 |
|
$
2,255 |
Professional
fees |
|
284 |
|
288 |
Other |
|
2,075 |
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
6,237 |
|
$
4,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5.
Stockholders Equity
In March 1999, the Board of
Directors (the Board) declared a two-for-one stock split for
stockholders of record on May 14, 1999. In November 1999, the Board
declared an additional two-for-one stock split for stockholders of
record on November 22, 1999. All share and per share information has
been restated to reflect the effect of the stock splits.
VeriSign is authorized to
issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31,
1999, no shares of preferred stock had been issued.
On January 30, 1998, VeriSign
completed its initial public offering (IPO) by issuing
13,800,000 shares of its common stock at an initial public offering
price of $3.50 per share. VeriSign received net proceeds from the
offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
offering expenses, of approximately $43.7 million. Concurrently with the
IPO, each outstanding share of VeriSigns convertible preferred
stock was automatically converted into one share of common
stock.
In January 1999, VeriSign
completed a follow-on public offering by issuing 6,390,000 shares at an
offering price of $20.13 per share. VeriSign received net proceeds from
the offering of approximately $121.4 million.
No dividends have been
declared or paid on common stock since VeriSigns inception.
SecureIT paid Subchapter S distributions of $793,000 to its stockholders
for minimum tax obligations during the year ended December 31,
1998.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
|
Notes
Receivable From Stockholders
|
In November 1996, VeriSign
loaned several officers an aggregate of $543,000, due December 31, 2005,
bearing interest at a rate per annum of 6.95%, payable quarterly. In
August 1997, VeriSign loaned an officer an aggregate of $116,000, due
December 31, 2006, bearing interest at a rate per annum of 6.87%,
payable quarterly. The loans are full recourse and are collateralized by
pledges of the shares of VeriSign common stock that were purchased. As
of December 31, 1999, all loans had been repaid in full.
Note 6.
Stock Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 1999, a
total of 22,719,893 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
upon the exercise of stock options and for the future grant of stock
options or awards under VeriSigns equity incentive
plans.
The 1995 Stock Option Plan and
the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the 1995 and 1997 Plans) were
terminated concurrent with VeriSigns IPO. Options to purchase
common stock granted under the 1995 and 1997 Plans remain outstanding
and subject to the vesting and exercise terms of the original grant. All
shares that remained available for future issuance under the 1995 and
1997 Plans at the time of their termination were transferred to the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan. No further options can be granted under the 1995
and 1997 Plans. Options granted under the 1995 and 1997 Plans are
subject to terms substantially similar to those described below with
respect to options granted under the 1998 Equity Incentive
Plan.
The 1998 Equity Incentive Plan
(the 1998 Plan) authorizes the award of options, restricted
stock awards and stock bonuses. As of December 31, 1998, no restricted
stock awards or stock bonus awards have been made under the 1998
Plan.
Options may be granted at an
exercise price not less than 100% of the fair market value of VeriSign
s common stock on the date of grant for incentive stock options
and 85% of the fair market value for nonqualified stock options. All
options are granted at the discretion of the Board and have a term not
greater than 7 years from the date of grant. Options issued generally
vest 25% on the first anniversary date and ratably over the following 12
quarters. At December 31, 1999, 4,677,031 shares remain available for
future awards under the 1998 Plan.
Members of the Board who are
not employees of VeriSign, or of any parent, subsidiary or affiliate of
VeriSign, are eligible to participate in the 1998 Directors Plan (the
Directors Plan). The option grants under the Directors Plan are
automatic and nondiscretionary, and the exercise price of the options is
100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the
grant. Each eligible director who becomes a director on or after January
28, 1998 will initially be granted an option to purchase 60,000 shares
on the date he or she first becomes a director (the Initial Grant
). On each anniversary of a directors Initial Grant or most
recent grant if he or she was ineligible to receive an Initial Grant,
each eligible director will automatically be granted an additional
option to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock if the director has
served continuously as a director since the date of the Initial Grant or
most recent grant. The term of the options under the Directors Plan is
ten years and options vest as to 6.25% of the shares each quarter after
the date of the grant, provided the optionee remains a director of
VeriSign. At December 31, 1999, 200,000 shares remain available for
future grant under the Directors Plan.
In connection with the
acquisition of SecureIT, VeriSign assumed SecureITs 1997 Stock
Option Plan (the SecureIT Plan). The SecureIT Plan provided
for the grant of both fixed and performance-based stock
options. Options granted under the SecureIT Plan generally have a term of
seven years and vest over a four-year period, 25% on each anniversary of
the grant date. No further options can be granted under the SecureIT
Plan.
A summary of stock option
activity under the Plans follows:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Outstanding at
beginning of
year |
|
16,516,368 |
|
|
$
4.79 |
|
10,371,156 |
|
|
$
.75 |
|
6,432,300 |
|
|
$
.20 |
Granted |
|
7,300,926 |
|
|
35.66 |
|
9,735,024 |
|
|
7.69 |
|
6,406,608 |
|
|
1.06 |
Exercised |
|
(4,198,177 |
) |
|
3.10 |
|
(2,962,548 |
) |
|
.58 |
|
(2,131,124 |
) |
|
.12 |
Canceled |
|
(1,783,755 |
) |
|
9.60 |
|
(627,264 |
) |
|
2.84 |
|
(336,628 |
) |
|
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
end of
year |
|
17,835,362 |
|
|
16.77 |
|
16,516,368 |
|
|
4.79 |
|
10,371,156 |
|
|
.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
end of year |
|
2,424,728 |
|
|
3.36 |
|
1,673,860 |
|
|
.82 |
|
1,032,352 |
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average fair value
of options granted during
the year |
|
|
|
|
21.86 |
|
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
.26 |
The following table summarizes
information about stock options outstanding as of December 31,
1999:
Range of
Exercise Prices
|
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Weighted
-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Shares
Exercisable
|
|
Weighted
-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
$
.01 - $ .56 |
|
2,254,814 |
|
4.00
years |
|
$
.36 |
|
962,603 |
|
$
.31 |
$
1.00 - $ 3.03 |
|
2,436,140 |
|
4.79
years |
|
1.70 |
|
681,212 |
|
1.72 |
$
6.44 - $ 9.81 |
|
5,086,540 |
|
5.77
years |
|
7.39 |
|
636,697 |
|
7.40 |
$ 10.03 -
$ 18.25 |
|
1,670,768 |
|
5.93
years |
|
13.31 |
|
136,716 |
|
12.11 |
$ 22.50 -
$ 29.63 |
|
2,265,800 |
|
6.26
years |
|
26.13 |
|
|
|
|
$ 30.70 -
$ 38.50 |
|
3,206,030 |
|
6.57
years |
|
36.85 |
|
|
|
|
$ 41.19 -
$ 46.41 |
|
437,100 |
|
7.39
years |
|
42.29 |
|
7,500 |
|
41.19 |
$ 53.03 -
$ 54.44 |
|
152,210 |
|
6.75
years |
|
53.49 |
|
|
|
|
$ 61.75 -
$ 92.91 |
|
225,560 |
|
6.86
years |
|
75.62 |
|
|
|
|
$ 112.38 -
$190.94 |
|
100,400 |
|
6.97
years |
|
133.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
.01 - $190.94 |
|
17,835,362 |
|
5.70
years |
|
|
|
2,424,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
VeriSign has reserved
3,000,000 shares for issuance under the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (Purchase Plan). Eligible employees may purchase common
stock through payroll deductions by electing to have between 2% and 15%
of their compensation withheld. Each participant is granted an option to
purchase
common stock on the first day of each 24 month offering period and this
option is automatically exercised on the last day of each six month
purchase period during the offering period. The purchase price for the
common stock under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of the fair
market value of the common stock on the first day of the applicable
offering period and the last day of the applicable purchase period. The
first offering period began on January 30, 1998. Offering periods
thereafter will begin on February 1 and August 1 of each year. Shares of
common stock issued under the Purchase Plan totaled 547,896 in 1999 and
232,900 in 1998. As of December 31, 1999, 2,219,204 shares remain
available for future issuance. The weighted-average fair value of the
options granted under the Purchase Plan was $15.28 in 1999 and $7.18 in
1998.
VeriSign applies the intrinsic
value method in accounting for its equity-based compensation plan. Had
compensation cost for its equity-based compensation plans been
determined consistent with the fair value approach set forth in SFAS No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, VeriSign
s net income (loss) would have been as follows:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share data) |
As
reported: |
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$
3,955 |
|
|
$(19,743 |
) |
|
$(18,589 |
) |
Net income
(loss) per share: |
Basic |
|
$
.04 |
|
|
$
(.24 |
) |
|
$
(.65 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$
.03 |
|
|
$
(.24 |
) |
|
$
(.65 |
) |
Pro
forma: |
Net (loss) under SFAS
No. 123 |
|
$(24,667 |
) |
|
$(24,117 |
) |
|
$(18,904 |
) |
Net (loss) per
share: |
Basic |
|
$
(.25 |
) |
|
$
(.29 |
) |
|
$
(.66 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$
(.25 |
) |
|
$
(.29 |
) |
|
$
(.66 |
) |
The fair value of stock
options and Purchase Plan options granted subsequent to VeriSigns
IPO on January 30, 1998 was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes model. The fair value of stock options granted prior to
the IPO and for stock options granted by SecureIT prior to its
acquisition was estimated on the date of grant using the minimum value
method. The following table sets forth the weighted-average assumptions
used to calculate the fair value of the stock options and Purchase Plan
options for each period presented.
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
Stock
options: |
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
85 |
% |
|
70 |
%* |
|
0 |
% |
Risk-free interest
rate |
|
5.54 |
% |
|
4.95 |
% |
|
6.14 |
% |
Expected
life |
|
3.5
years |
|
|
3.5
years |
|
|
5
years |
|
Dividend
yield |
|
zero |
|
|
zero |
|
|
zero |
|
Purchase Plan
options: |
Volatility |
|
85 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
Risk-free interest
rate |
|
5.00 |
% |
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
|
Expected
life |
|
1.25
years |
|
|
1.25
years |
|
|
|
|
Dividend
yield |
|
zero |
|
|
zero |
|
|
|
|
*
|
Volatility was
zero under the minimum value method for grants prior to January 30,
1998 and for all grants made by SecureIT prior to its acquisition by
VeriSign.
|
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 7.
Income Taxes
Total income tax expense for
the year ended December 31, 1999 was allocated as follows:
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$
1,514 |
|
State |
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
Federal |
|
(1,514 |
) |
State |
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense |
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
Deferred |
|
$
16,875 |
|
Charge to
comprehensive income in lieu of income taxes attributable to
disqualifying dispositions of stock
options |
|
(46,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
(29,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The difference between income
tax expense and the amount resulting from applying the Federal statutory
rate of 34% to income before income taxes for 1999 is attributable to
the following:
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Income taxes at
Federal statutory rate |
|
$
1,345 |
|
Foreign
losses |
|
1,108 |
|
Reduction in
valuation allowance |
|
(1,726 |
) |
Research and
experimentation credit |
|
(1,101 |
) |
Other |
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes |
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 1998 and 1997, the Company
did not record any income tax expense because it experienced significant
operating losses.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
The tax effects of temporary
differences that give rise to significant portions of VeriSigns
deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Deferred tax
assets: |
|
|
|
Net operating loss
carryforwards and deferred start-up costs |
|
$
49,011 |
|
|
$
22,188 |
|
Tax credit
carryforwards |
|
3,240 |
|
|
1,521 |
|
Property and
equipment |
|
54 |
|
|
1,135 |
|
Other |
|
2,084 |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,389 |
|
|
26,175 |
|
Valuation
allowance |
|
(7,736 |
) |
|
(26,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities: |
Unrealized
gain |
|
(46,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax
assets |
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has established a
valuation allowance equal to 100% of the net deferred tax assets because
the realization of the deferred tax assets is uncertain. The total
valuation allowance decreased $18,439,000 in 1999 and increased
$13,250,000 in 1998.
Gross deferred tax assets as
of December 31, 1999 include approximately $36,919,000 relating to the
exercise of stock options, which is subject to a valuation allowance of
approximately $7,736,000. Upon reversal of this valuation allowance, the
tax benefit thus realized will be credited to stockholders
equity.
As of December 31, 1999,
VeriSign has available net operating loss carryforwards for federal
income tax purposes of approximately $127,376,000 and for California
income tax purposes of approximately $64,510,000. The federal net
operating loss carryforwards will expire, if not utilized, in 2010
through 2019. The California net operating loss carryforwards will
expire, if not utilized, in 2004.
As of December 31, 1999,
VeriSign has available for carryover research and experimentation tax
credits for federal income tax purposes of approximately $1,444,000 and
for California income tax purposes of approximately $1,004,000. The
federal research and experimentation tax credits will expire, if not
utilized, in 2010 through 2019. California research and experimental tax
credits carry forward indefinitely until utilized. VeriSign also has
federal foreign tax credits of approximately $758,000, which expire, if
not utilized, in 2001 through 2002. To date, foreign income taxes have
not been significant.
The Tax Reform Act of 1986
imposed substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating
losses and tax credits in the event of an ownership change
of a corporation. Accordingly, VeriSigns ability to utilize net
operating loss and credit carryforwards may be limited as a result of
such an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 8.
Commitments
VeriSign leases its facilities
under operating leases that extend through 2005. Future minimum lease
payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 1999
are as follows:
|
|
(In
thousands) |
2000 |
|
$
4,337 |
2001 |
|
3,853 |
2002 |
|
3,003 |
2003 |
|
2,831 |
2004 |
|
2,787 |
Thereafter |
|
971 |
|
|
|
Total minimum lease
payments |
|
$17,782 |
|
|
|
Net rental expense under
operating leases was $3,700,000 in 1999, $1,936,000 in 1998 and
$1,722,000 in 1997. VeriSign has sub-leased an office to a company under
a non-cancelable operating lease. VeriSign received payments of $507,000
during 1999 and will receive payments of $778,000 during 2000 and
$533,000 during 2001.
Note 9.
Special Charges
In connection with the
acquisition of SecureIT in July 1998 (see Note 2), VeriSign recorded a
special charge of $3.6 million for direct and other merger-related costs
pertaining to the merger transaction and certain stock-based
compensation charges. Merger transaction costs totaled $2.4 million and
consisted primarily of fees for investment bankers, attorneys and
accountants, filing fees and other related charges. The stock-based
compensation charges of $1.2 million related to certain performance
stock options held by SecureIT employees, the vesting of which either
automatically accelerated upon change of control or were accelerated by
VeriSigns Board of Directors subsequent to the merger.
In September 1996, VeriFone,
Inc. which subsequently became a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Hewlett-Packard, filed a lawsuit against VeriSign alleging, among other
things, trademark infringement. In November 1997, VeriSign,
Hewlett-Packard and VeriFone reached an agreement, under which, among
other things, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock,
which were transferred to Hewlett-Packard, and VeriSign and VeriFone
settled all claims. The settlement amount was recorded in the third
quarter of 1997 as a $2.0 million charge to operations.
In November 1997, VeriSign
entered into a preferred provider agreement with Microsoft Corporation (
Microsoft) whereby the companies will develop, promote and
distribute a variety of client-based and server-based digital
certificate solutions and VeriSign will be designated as the premier
provider of digital certificates for Microsoft customers. In connection
with the agreement, VeriSign issued 400,000 shares of common stock to
Microsoft resulting in an $800,000 charge to operations.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 10.
Segment Information
VeriSign has adopted Statement
of Financial Accounting Standard No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This statement
establishes standards for publicly held entities to follow in reporting
information about operating segments in annual financial statements and
requires that those entities report selected information about operating
segments in interim financial statements. This statement also
establishes standards for related disclosures about product and
services, geographic areas and major customers. Operating segments are
defined by SFAS No. 131 as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly
by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. VeriSign has identified one
reportable operating segment based on the criteria of SFAS No.
131.
VeriSign operates in the
United States, Europe and Japan and derives substantially all of its
revenues from sales of Internet-based trust services. VeriSigns
Chief Executive and Executive Officers evaluate financial performance
based on measures of business segment revenues.
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Revenues: |
|
|
United
States |
|
$61,997 |
|
$33,650 |
|
$12,122 |
All other
countries |
|
22,779 |
|
5,280 |
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$84,776 |
|
$38,930 |
|
$13,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, revenues are
attributed to the country in which the contract originated. However,
revenues from all digital certificates issued from the Mountain View,
California facility are attributed to the United States because it is
impracticable to determine the country of origin.
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
|
(In
thousands) |
Long-lived
assets: |
United
States |
|
$155,992 |
|
$
8,655 |
|
$7,619 |
All other
countries |
|
2,332 |
|
1,952 |
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$158,324 |
|
$10,607 |
|
$9,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets consist
primarily of property and equipment and long-term
investments.
VeriSign had one customer that
accounted for 10% of consolidated revenues in 1997 (see Note 1). No
customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues in 1999 or
1998.
VERISIGN, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
DECEMBER 31,
1999, 1998 AND 1997
Note 11.
Pending Acquisitions
|
Thawte
Consulting (Pty) Ltd.
|
In December 1999, VeriSign
announced that it would acquire Thawte Consulting (Pty) Ltd. (
Thawte), a privately held South African company that
provides digital certificates to websites and software developers.
VeriSign will issue shares of its common stock with an aggregate market
value of $575 million in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of
Thawte. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase. The
acquisition is subject to a number of conditions, including regulatory
approvals in South Africa and other customary conditions.
In December 1999, VeriSign
announced that it would acquire Signio, Inc. (Signio), a
privately held company that provides payment services that connect
online merchants, business-to-business exchanges, payment processors and
financial institutions on the Internet. VeriSign will issue
approximately 5.6 million shares of its common stock in exchange for all
of the outstanding shares of Signio and will assume Signios
outstanding employee stock options. The transaction will be accounted
for as a purchase. The acquisition is subject to customary conditions of
closing and is expected to be completed in the first quarter of
2000.
|
Network
Solutions, Inc. (Unaudited)
|
On March 7, 2000, VeriSign
announced that it would acquire Network Solutions, Inc. (Network
Solutions), a publicly held company that provides Internet domain
name registration and global registry services. VeriSign will issue 2.15
shares of its common stock for each share of Network Solutions stock as
constituted prior to the 2 for 1 split of Network Solutions stock to be
completed on March 10, 2000. The transaction will be accounted for as a
purchase. The acquisition is subject to customary conditions of closing
including approval by both the VeriSign and Network Solutions
stockholders.
As required under Item 14.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K, the
exhibits filed as part of this report are provided in this separate
section. The exhibits included in this section are as
follows:
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
4.06 |
|
Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of December 19, 1999 by and between the
Registrant and the
Mark Shuttleworth |
|
|
21.01 |
|
Subsidiaries of
the Registrant |
|
|
23.01 |
|
Consent of
Independent Auditors |
|
|
27.01 |
|
Financial Data
Schedule |