RENTAL SERVICE CORP
DFAN14A, 1999-05-20
EQUIPMENT RENTAL & LEASING, NEC
Previous: AMPLIDYNE INC, 10QSB, 1999-05-20
Next: VIALINK CO, POS AM, 1999-05-20





                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                          SCHEDULE 14A Information
       Consent Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the Securities
                            Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  [X]

Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Consent Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
    14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Consent Statement
[X] Definitive Additional Materials
[X] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12

                         RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION
              (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                            UNITED RENTALS, INC.
  (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]   No fee required.
[ ]   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
      (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
      (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
      (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
            computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
            amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
            was determined):
      (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transactions: 
      (5)   Total fee paid:
 [  ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 [  ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
      Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
      fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
      statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
      (1) Amount Previously Paid:
      (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
      (3) Filing Party:
      (4) Date Filed:







                               PRESENTATION TO  
                 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS 
                                 MAY 1999 

  
 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 
  
      Certain statements contained in this presentation are forward-looking
 in nature.  These statements can be identified by the use of forward-
 looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should,"
 or "anticipates" or the negative thereof or comparable terminology, or by
 discussions of strategy.  You are cautioned that our business and
 operations are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and,
 consequently, our actual results may materially differ from those projected
 by any forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause our actual
 results to differ from those projected include, but are not limited to, the
 following: (1) a downturn in construction and industrial activity could
 lead to a decrease in demand for our equipment, (2) the prices we are
 required to pay for acquisitions could increase, (3) the cost or difficulty
 of integrating the businesses that we acquire may be greater than expected,
 (4) we may not realize expected cost savings, synergies, revenues and
 earnings from our acquisitions, including our proposed transaction with
 Rental Service Corporation, (5) we cannot be certain that we will always
 have access to the additional capital that we may require for our growth
 strategy or that our cost of capital will not increase, (6) companies that
 we acquire could have undiscovered liabilities and (7) we are highly
 dependent on the services of our senior management.  These risks and
 uncertainties, as well as others, are discussed in greater detail in our
 SEC filings, including our most recent Report on Form 10-K . We make no
 commitment to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to
 reflect events or circumstances after the date any such statement is made. 


                                 BACKGROUND
  
 12/98     United Rentals approached Rental Service to discuss a potential
           business combination. 
  
 1/15/99   Rental Service management told United Rentals that Rental Service
           is not for sale.  
  
 1/21/99   Six days later, Rental Service announced a no premium so-called
           merger of equals with NationsRent.  Rental Service erected
           significant barriers around its transaction with NationsRent by
           agreeing to an exorbitant $40 million break-up fee, an unusual
           cross-option arrangement, and other entrenchment mechanisms. 
  
 3/99      Rental Service contemplated terminating the NationsRent merger
           agreement by seeking a declaratory judgment that the merger
           agreement had been materially breached by NationsRent. 

                                 BACKGROUND
  
 4/1/99    Rental Service stock declined by 26% per share since the
           NationsRent agreement was announced on January 21, to $17.25 per
           share on the last trading day prior to the  announcement of the
           United Rentals tender offer. 
  
 4/5/99    United Rentals offered Rental Service stockholders $22.75 per
           share in cash - a 32% premium over the last closing price.  
  
 4/5/99    United Rentals filed suit to invalidate certain restrictive
           aspects of the proposed NationsRent/Rental Service transaction,
           as well as the merger agreement itself. 
  
 4/8/99    Ten weeks after signing the merger agreement, and only after
           United Rentals filed its lawsuit, Rental Service publicly filed
           the NationsRent merger agreement. 
  
 4/16/99   Rental Service's Board rejected United Rentals' premium cash
           offer and adopted a poison pill in a further effort to prevent
           United Rentals from successfully completing its tender offer. 

                                 BACKGROUND
  
 4/16/99   Rental Service announced Q1 earnings that included unusually high
           used equipment sales.  
  
 4/16/99   Rental Service announced that its Chairman and CEO has taken a
           leave of absence. 
  
 5/7/99    NationsRent announced Q1 earnings that were lower than consensus
           estimates. 
  
 5/7/99    Rental Service announced it is renegotiating its deal with
           NationsRent, while still refusing to talk with United Rentals. 
  
 5/13/99   United Rentals began to solicit written consents to remove the
           Rental Service Board. 
  
 Today     Rental Service continues to refuse to talk with United Rentals. 



                   THE UNITED RENTALS OFFER IS SUPERIOR  
                  TO THE PROPOSED NATIONSRENT TRANSACTION 
  
 OUR $22.75 OFFER PROVIDES: 
  
      o    A 45% premium to Rental Service's closing price of $15.69 on
           December 31, 1998. 
      o    A 32% premium to Rental Service's closing price of $17.25 on the
           last trading day prior to our tender offer. 
      o    A 28% premium to the 30-day average closing price of $17.78 prior
           to the announcement of our offer. 
      o    The certainty of cash compared to the uncertain future of a
           combined company controlled by NationsRent's board and
           management. 
  


                RENTAL SERVICE'S FLAWED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 
  
 WE BELIEVE: 
  
      o    Rental Service's financial projections are inflated. 
           -    The projections unrealistically assume an EBITDA margin of
                38.8% in 1999 and 38.9% in 2000 versus the actual reported
                margin of 36.2% in 1998, adding approximately $20 million of
                EBITDA in 1999 and approximately $26 million of EBITDA in
                2000. 
           -    The projections assume 30 cold starts per year, although
                only four were completed so far this year.  
           -    The Rental Service projections for 1999-2003 result in a
                cash flow deficit of approximately $750 MILLION. 
  
      o    Rental Service's multiple and premium analysis mischaracterizes
           the United Rentals offer. 
           -    Public market trading multiples are now less than half of
                what they were at the time of the United Rentals/U.S.
                Rentals and Atlas Copco/Prime transactions. 
           -    United Rentals' offer to Rental Service stockholders is at a
                32% market premium   the U.S. Rentals market premium was
                only 6% and the Prime market premium was 29%. 
  
      o    Rental Service greatly exaggerated the potential accretion to
           United Rentals. 
  
           -    Rosy earnings projections that are much higher than Street
                estimates account for the majority of the $0.20 per share
                discrepancy between the United Rentals and Rental Service
                accretion estimates. 
           -    Rental Service also ignored the impact of the necessary
                future issuance of equity to maintain our targeted debt-to-
                capitalization ratio. 



                             ACCRETION ANALYSIS 
  
           AT $22.75 PER SHARE WE EXPECT $0.10 OF EPS ACCRETION,   
            NOT THE $0.30 PER SHARE CLAIMED BY RENTAL SERVICE. 
  
           RSV 1999E Pre-tax Income(a)                   68.0 
           Less: Transaction Goodwill Amortization       (5.4) 
           Financing Fee Amortization                   (59.4) 
           Add: Synergies                                20.0 
           Incremental Pre-tax Income                    23.2 
           Less:Taxes                                   (13.1) 
           Incremental Net Income                       $10.1 
           Per Share Impact                              $0.10 
  
 ____________________ 
 (a) Based on consensus Street estimates. 
  
 Note: Calculation is pro forma for full year 1999.



                   THE NATIONSRENT/RENTAL SERVICE PROPOSAL 
                        IS NOT A "MERGER OF EQUALS" 
  
            RENTAL SERVICE STOCKHOLDERS WOULD RECEIVE NO PREMIUM 
     NATIONSRENT STOCKHOLDERS WOULD RECEIVE A 26% PREMIUM AND CONTROL 
  
      o    The proposed exchange ratio of 0.355 Rental Service shares for
           each NationsRent share represented a 26% premium to NationsRent's
           share price of $6.56 on the day prior to the deal announcement. 
  
      o    NationsRent would name five of the nine directors on the combined
           board. 
  
      o    NationsRent insiders and affiliates of H. Wayne Huizenga would
           control about 25% of the combined company's stock; Rental Service
           executive officers and directors would own approximately 3%.  
  
      o    NationsRent's CEO is slated to become the CEO of the new company. 
  
      o    The combined company would be called "RSC NationsRent," and its
           name would be changed to "NationsRent" within 12 months. 



                   WHY YOU SHOULD REMOVE THE RENTAL SERVICE BOARD 
  
      o    The Board agreed to an unusually high $40 million "break up"
           payment if the NationsRent merger is not completed   more than
           twice the average percentage.  The fee gets paid even if Rental
           Service stockholders vote the deal down.  
  
      o    The Rental Service Board approved an unusual option agreement
           that could make pooling-of-interests accounting impossible for
           any alternative deal. 
  
      o    Rather than entering into discussions with United Rentals, the
           Rental Service Board adopted a poison pill to block our tender
           offer.  
  
      o    The Rental Service Board has to this day failed to disclose to
           its stockholders that in March 1999 it contemplated terminating
           the NationsRent merger agreement by seeking a declaratory
           judgment that the merger agreement had been materially breached
           by NationsRent. 
  
      o    Of Rental Service's eight person Board, three directors are not
           independent and three additional directors have derived
           substantial economic benefit from Rental Service.



                               ACTION POINTS 
  
 TENDER OFFER 
  
      o    Send a strong message to the Rental Service Board to maximize
           stockholder value: tender your shares into our $22.75 premium
           cash offer by May 27, 1999. 
  
 CONSENT SOLICITATION (BLUE CARD)  
  
      o    Remove the Rental Service Board. 
  
      o    Elect truly independent nominees who will diligently exercise
           their fiduciary duty to maximize stockholder value and who will
           seriously consider our $22.75 cash offer or any superior offer. 



                                 SUMMARY 
  
 o    United Rentals has offered $22.75 per share in cash - a 32% premium. 
  
 o    The Rental Service Board has not fulfilled its fiduciary duties: 
      -    It recommended paying a premium to NationsRent, yet is giving up
           control. 
      -    It has failed to disclose material information to stockholders. 
      -    It "plays favorites" with NationsRent by refusing to enter into
           discussions with United Rentals and erecting barriers against our
           offer. 
  
 o    Rental Service stockholders should: 
      -    Tender their shares to United Rentals. 
      -    Replace the Rental Service Board with a slate of truly
           independent nominees. 



                CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING PARTICIPANTS 
  
      United Rentals, Inc. ("United Rentals"), UR Acquisition Corporation
 ("UR Acquisition") and the following persons named below may be deemed to
 be "participants" in the solicitation of proxies from stockholders of
 Rental Service Corporation ("Rental Service") in opposition to the proposed
 merger with NationsRent: the directors of United Rentals (Bradley Jacobs
 (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer), Wayland Hicks (Vice
 Chairman and Chief Operating Officer), John Milne (Vice Chairman, Chief
 Acquisition Officer and Secretary), William Berry (President), John
 McKinney (Vice President, Finance), Leon Black, Richard Colburn, Ronald
 DeFeo, Michael Gross, Richard Heckmann, Gerald Tsai, Jr. and Christian
 Weyer); the following executive officers and employees of United Rentals:
 Michael Nolan (Chief Financial Officer) and Robert Miner (Vice President,
 Strategic Planning); and the nominees of United Rentals (the "Nominees") to
 stand for election to the Board of Directors of Rental Service (Messrs.
 Richard Daniel, Raymond Troubh, William Aaron, David Bronner, Peter Gold,
 David Katz, Elliot Levine and Jeffrey Parker and Ms. Stephanie Joseph). 
  
      As of the date hereof, United Rentals is the beneficial owner of 100
 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of
 Rental Service.  Other than set forth herein, as of the date hereof,
 neither United Rentals, UR Acquisition nor any of the persons listed above,
 has any interest, direct or indirect, by security holding or otherwise, in
 Rental Service.  
  
      United Rentals has retained Goldman, Sachs & Co. ("Goldman Sachs") to
 act as its financial advisor and the Dealer Managers in connection with the
 tender offer (the "Offer") by United Rentals and UR Acquisition to purchase
 the shares of Common Stock of Rental Service for $22.75 per share in cash,
 for which Goldman Sachs may receive substantial fees, as well as
 reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.  In addition, United
 Rentals has agreed to indemnify Goldman Sachs and certain related persons
 against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the
 federal securities laws, arising out of its engagement.  United Rentals has
 also entered into a commitment letter with Goldman Sachs Credit Partners
 L.P. ("GSCP") relating to the financing of the Offer pursuant to which GSCP
 may receive substantial fees, as well as reimbursement of reasonable out-
 of-pocket expenses.  Goldman Sachs does not admit that it or any of its
 partners, directors, officers, employees, affiliates or controlling
 persons, if any, is a "participant" as defined in Schedule 14A promulgated
 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in the solicitation
 of proxies and/or consents, or that Schedule 14A requires the disclosure of
 certain information concerning Goldman Sachs.  In connection with Goldman
 Sachs' role as financial advisor to United Rentals, the following
 investment banking employees of Goldman Sachs may communicate in person, by
 telephone or otherwise with a limited number of institutions, brokers or
 other persons who are stockholders of Rental Service and may solicit
 proxies from these institutions, brokers or other persons: Naeemah Clark,
 Bruce Evans, Lucien Farrell, David Herman, Robert Lipman, Jeffrey Moslow,
 Cody Smith and Lawrence Steyn.  Goldman Sachs engages in a full range of
 investment banking, securities trading, market-making and brokerage
 services for institutional and individual clients. In the normal course of
 its business Goldman Sachs may trade securities of Rental Service for its
 own account and the accounts of its customers, and accordingly, may at any
 time hold a long or short position in such securities.  Goldman Sachs has
 informed United Rentals that, as of the date hereof, Goldman Sachs holds no
 shares of the Common Stock of Rental Service for its own account.  Goldman
 Sachs and certain of its affiliates may have voting and dispositive power
 with respect to certain shares of Rental Service Common Stock held in asset
 management, brokerage and other accounts.  Goldman Sachs and such
 affiliates disclaim beneficial ownership of such shares of Rental Service
 Common Stock. 





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission