<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 26, 1996
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 333-07601
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
DELAWARE 57-1040952
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization) identification number)
18831 VON KARMAN AVENUE,
IRVINE, CA 92612
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
</TABLE>
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (864) 597-8000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON
TITLE OF EACH CLASS WHICH REGISTERED
<S> <C>
None None
</TABLE>
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
As of February 25, 1997, 1,000 shares of registrant's common stock, $0.10
par value per share, were outstanding, all of which were owned by the
registrant's parent, Flagstar Corporation.
THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
(I)(1)(A) AND (B) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM 10-K WITH THE
REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
<S> <C> <C>
PART I
Item 1. Business................................................................................................... 1
Item 2. Properties................................................................................................. 6
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.......................................................................................... 7
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................................ 7
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters...................................... 7
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.................................................................................... 8
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...................... 10
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................................................................ 13
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure....................... 13
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant......................................................... 13
Item 11. Executive Compensation..................................................................................... 13
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management............................................. 13
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................................................. 13
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K............................................ 15
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.......................................................................................... F-1
SIGNATURES.............................................................................................................
</TABLE>
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The forward-looking statements included in the "Business", "Legal
Proceedings" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" sections, which reflect management's best judgment
based on factors currently known, involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as
"expects", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", and "hopes", variations of such
words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including,
but not limited to, the factors discussed in such sections and those set forth
in the cautionary statements contained in Exhibit 99 to this Form 10-K. (See
Exhibit 99 -- Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.) Forward-looking information provided by the Company in such sections
pursuant to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 should be evaluated in the context of these factors.
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION
FRD Acquisition Co. ("FRD" or, together with its subsidiaries and including
its predecessor, as applicable, the "Company") was incorporated in February 1996
as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flagstar Corporation ("Flagstar"), which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Flagstar Companies, Inc. ("FCI"). On May 23, 1996,
FRD consummated the acquisition of the Coco's and Carrows restaurant chains
consisting of 347 Company-owned units within the mid-scale family-style dining
category. The acquisition price of $313.4 million was paid in consideration for
all of the outstanding stock of FRI-M Corporation ("FRI-M"), the former
subsidiary of Family Restaurants, Inc., ("FRI"), which owns the Coco's and
Carrows chains.
In the financial statements and selected financial data included herein,
reference to "FRI Predecessor Company" refers to the period of ownership of
FRI-M by the Restaurant Enterprises Group, Inc. ("REG") prior to January 27,
1994. Reference to the "FRD Predecessor Company" refers to the period of
ownership of FRI-M by FRI commencing January 27, 1994, giving effect to
information concerning events occurring upon FRI's emergence from a Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Code reorganization (the "Reorganization"), through May 23, 1996.
"FRD Successor" refers to the period of ownership of FRI-M by FRD subsequent to
May 23, 1996.
The FRI Predecessor and FRD Predecessor combined financial statements for
the periods indicated represent the financial position and operations of FRI-M,
as a wholly-owned subsidiary of FRI (or its predecessor), and certain
subsidiaries of FRI-M including those restaurants that made up the Family
Restaurant Division and the FRD Commissary, both of which were divisions of FRI.
The Family Restaurant Division primarily consisted of the Coco's and Carrows
restaurant concepts. The FRI-M combined financial statements exclude the
financial position and operations of FRI-MRD Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of the FRI-M Corporation which was not acquired by FRD.
The Company is one of the nation's leading operators of family-style
restaurants. As of year-end, the Company operated 343 restaurants owned or
leased by the Company, principally under the Coco's and Carrows names.
Approximately 74% of the Company's restaurants are located in California, making
the Company the second largest family-style restaurant operator in California,
both in terms of sales volume and number of restaurants. Coco's and Carrows
restaurants were founded more than 25 years ago and have developed excellent
name recognition and a loyal customer base, with customers on average making
return visits to the restaurants seven and six times per month, respectively. In
addition to its domestic operations, as of year-end the Company was the licensor
of 278 Coco's restaurants in Japan and South Korea.
RESTAURANTS
The Company's restaurants offer an extensive menu of moderately priced
breakfast, lunch and dinner items and are typically open either 18 or 24 hours a
day. Both Coco's and Carrows restaurants provide casual sit-down dining
experiences and emphasize consistently high quality food with an excellent
price-to-value relationship and friendly, efficient service. The Company
generated approximately 25%, 34% and 41% of its 1996 revenues from the
breakfast, lunch and dinner dayparts, respectively.
The Company's restaurants are generally located in densely populated
suburban areas with high commercial traffic and a strong residential base. The
commercial traffic typically provides a large portion of the Company's weekday
breakfast and lunch customers, while the residential traffic accounts for a
majority of the Company's dinner and weekend business. The Company believes that
the location and concentration of its restaurants allows it to realize certain
economies of scale in advertising, distribution and field supervision.
While the Coco's and Carrows concepts appeal to many of the same
broad-based customers, they are positioned, as described below, to target two
distinct groups within the mid-scale family-style category. Through this dual
positioning, the Company capitalizes on various demographic and industry trends
while achieving substantial economies of scale (i.e., advertising, distribution
and field supervision) for the two chains of restaurants.
COCO'S
Coco's is positioned to appeal to a younger, more contemporary customer who
is more quality oriented than cost conscious and who seeks a wide variety of
unique menu items that are not typically offered at family-style restaurants.
Coco's customers are more often white-collar professionals who are 25-54 years
of age and have annual incomes in excess
1
<PAGE>
of $50,000. Coco's has developed a strong following among this customer base
through its creative menus, new product development and execution capabilities,
quality of food and consistent, traditional "dinner house style" service. Coco's
service is evolving in order to better compete with the casual dining
restaurants by focusing more on a "fun" dining experience. In addition, Coco's
has successfully implemented an in-restaurant and takeout bakery business which
reinforces the concept's quality food image and offers high margin products such
as pies, muffins, cakes and cookies.
Lunch and dinner dayparts are Coco's strongest, comprising 37% and 39% of
1996 sales, respectively. In 1996, the average check was $6.79, with average
annual unit sales of approximately $1.5 million. Positioned at the upper end of
the family-style restaurant category, Coco's competes most directly with Marie
Callender's, Baker's Square and Mimi's Cafe'.
In 1990, the Company established a wholly-owned subsidiary, CFC Franchising
Company ("CFC"), to franchise Coco's restaurants in the United States; however,
management has pursued limited domestic franchising expansion to date and only
five such Coco's franchised restaurants have been opened. In 1997, the Company
intends to open no new Company-owned Coco's restaurants and instead intends to
expand its franchising efforts in order to increase its market share, establish
a presence in new areas and further penetrate existing markets. Management
believes that franchising represents an opportunity to achieve additional growth
with low investment risk for the Coco's concept. The initial fee for a single
Coco's franchise is $35,000 and the current royalty payment rate is 4% of net
sales.
As of December 26, 1996 the Company licensed 278 Coco's restaurants abroad,
reflecting a foreign presence that is among the largest of any United
States-based, non-fast food restaurant chain. This presence was established
primarily through a 1979 licensing agreement with Kasumi Stores K.K. and Coco's
Japan, Ltd. (collectively, "Kasumi"). Under the terms of this licensing
agreement, Kasumi has the exclusive right through February 1, 2010, to use the
Coco's restaurant concept in Japan, and a non-exclusive right to do so in
certain other Asian countries. This agreement also gives Kasumi access to
certain training procedures and technical information concerning the operation
of such restaurants. At December 26, 1996, 239 Coco's were in operation in Japan
under the agreement with Kasumi. In addition, a sublicensee of Kasumi operates
39 restaurants under the Coco's name in South Korea.
During the seven months ended December 26, 1996 and the five months ended
May 23, 1996, operating profit from these license arrangements was $2.8 million
and $0.7 million, respectively. The Company's license agreement with Kasumi was
renegotiated effective February 1995. Prior to such renegotiation, Kasumi paid
the Company a weighted average royalty of 1.67% of net sales attributable to the
Company's Coco's restaurants located in Japan and Korea. Effective with the
renegotiated agreement, Kasumi pays the Company a weighted average royalty of
0.85% of net sales attributable to such restaurants. This reflects a .6% royalty
for new licensed units and a .75% royalty for new sublicensed units. The Company
incurs minimal expenses related to the licensing arrangements as the Company has
no assets located overseas. The Company intends to leverage its international
brand recognition by entering into additional licensing agreements in existing
and new markets abroad and currently is in preliminary discussions with
prospective licensees. Initial market research has indicated that attractive
opportunities may exist in Indonesia, Southeast Asia and Western Europe.
CARROWS
In contrast to Coco's, Carrows caters to a slightly older clientele with
more conservative tastes in food. Carrows' customers typically have traditional
values and tastes and seek more conservative and homestyle tastes in food and
dependable service at reasonable prices. Carrows' primary target market consists
of blue-collar customers who are 35-64 years of age, while its secondary target
market is senior citizens. Carrows has developed a strong reputation as a
restaurant that serves quality, traditional food at affordable prices in a
familiar setting while providing especially friendly service. This service,
along with Carrows' emphasis on larger portion, traditional American entrees,
enable Carrows to appeal to its targeted customers.
Lunch and dinner dayparts are Carrows' strongest, comprising 30% and 44% of
1996 sales, respectively. In 1996, the average guest check was $6.26, with
average annual unit sales of approximately $1.3 million.
Carrows is in the upper-middle price range of the family-style restaurant
category and competes most directly with Denny's, IHOP, Baker's Square and
Lyons. The Company has received numerous inquiries about potential Carrows
franchising sites. As a result, in 1997, the Company intends to use CFC to begin
franchising its Carrows brand.
SITE SELECTION
The Company's Franchise Development Group is responsible for identifying
and securing new franchise locations. The Franchise Development Group works
closely with real estate brokers in the Company's existing markets who are
2
<PAGE>
familiar with the Company's needs and selection criteria. In general, the
Company's restaurants are located in high-traffic commercial areas with a
substantial surrounding residential base within a three mile radius. The
commercial traffic typically provides the Company's weekday breakfast and lunch
clientele while the residential traffic accounts for a majority of the Company's
dinner and weekend business. Sites are evaluated on the basis of a variety of
factors, including demographic data, land use and environmental restrictions,
competition in the area, ease of access, visibility, availability of parking and
proximity to a major traffic generator such as a shopping mall, office complex,
stadium or university. Under the Company's franchise program, the franchisee
becomes the tenant for the restaurant and incurs the cost of any leasehold
tenant improvements and all operating costs.
RESTAURANT LAYOUT
The Company's restaurants average in size between 5,000 and 6,000 square
feet of floor space. Approximately 60% of each restaurant's space is dedicated
to dining room and customer areas, while 40% is dedicated to back room, kitchen
and storage areas. All the Company's Coco's restaurants have in-house bakeries
which reinforce the concept's high-quality image. Most of the Company's
restaurants do not have full bars but serve beer and wine at the tables. Seating
is a combination of tables and booths. Every restaurant has a waiting area where
customers may be seated while waiting for tables or booths to open. Since most
restaurants are located in power centers or strip center shopping malls, the
Company's restaurants have ample parking spaces to support their respective
guest counts.
OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE STRUCTURE. The Company's restaurant
management field structure is comprised of six regional directors of operations
(three for each concept), who each oversee approximately six to eleven district
managers. Each district manager, in turn, oversees five to nine restaurants. A
general manager, associate manager and assistant manager are employed at each
restaurant to manage day-to-day operations, including customer relations, food
service, cost control, restaurant maintenance, hiring and training of restaurant
employees, and the implementation of all Company policies. Coco's and Carrows
restaurants typically operate with a staff of 40 employees for low volume
restaurants to 70 employees for high volume restaurants. The average restaurant
employs approximately 45 to 55 employees, and a majority of the restaurant level
employees work part-time.
The Company recognizes the importance of its personnel in providing
customers with a quality dining experience. As a result, the Company offers its
employees extensive training and opportunities for promotion, as well as
incentive-based compensation. The success of these endeavors allows the Company
to enjoy employee turnover rates that the Company believes are below industry
averages and to benefit from a staff of highly experienced employees. The
Company's restaurant general managers average approximately 8.5 years of
experience with the Company.
TRAINING. Both Coco's and Carrows provide formal training programs for new
managers and hourly employees of the Company's restaurants. Exceptional general
managers are identified as "Executive Training Managers" and are responsible for
management trainees in their geographic regions. Management training includes
nine weeks with Executive Training Managers for Coco's (because of the bakery
concept) and eight weeks for Carrows. Hourly employees are trained by the
respective restaurant managers and each shift employs hourly employees who have
been certified to assist in the training of other employees.
QUALITY CONTROL. Coco's and Carrows have developed programs and systems
that ensure the safety, quality, and consistency of key ingredients, menu items
and operations. The major components of these programs include a
supplier/distributor quality assurance program that audits ingredients and
suppliers to ensure compliance with specifications, and a restaurant food safety
program which is responsible for maintaining communications with regulatory
agencies and proactively managing risk situations.
MENUS
COCO'S MENU STRATEGY. The Company's menu strategy for Coco's is to (i)
serve a high quality and variety of traditional American cuisine with emphasis
on new or trend-establishing fare with special attention given to plate
presentation in order to communicate a price-to-value relationship; (ii) utilize
high quality food products, including fresh fish, fresh baked muffins, dinner
breads, etc., to communicate the increasing strength of those product lines in
the market place; and (iii) improve sales and profits by strategic menu
offerings which appeal to a target market of families and adult males, a group
with respect to which Coco's has experienced substantial reductions since early
1994. The Company began slightly repositioning its Coco's restaurants during
1996 to appeal to a more "upscale" customer base. This repositioning is being
3
<PAGE>
accomplished without substantial capital investment by utilizing in-restaurant
changes to products, flatware, dishware, table settings, etc. The Company
believes that by redesigning Coco's current menu, Coco's will be in a better
strategic position in its primary markets. Enhancement and increased visibility
of Coco's bakery capabilities will also add to its strategic positioning. In
addition, consumer research established that the previous Coco's menu provided
too many options; as a result, a new three daypart menu has been designed and
tested and will be introduced in early 1997.
CARROWS MENU STRATEGY. The Company's menu strategy for Carrows is to (i)
serve a consistent quality and variety of traditional American cuisine, with an
emphasis on traditional homestyle fare, taking the extra steps to prepare these
meals better than any other restaurant chain; (ii) provide an excellent
price-to-value relationship through the amount of food offered for the money;
(iii) leverage the high quality of its food products to achieve increased
margins from its menu items; and (iv) generate sales and profits in the
breakfast and dinner dayparts through the strong marketing of breakfast specials
and high quality dinner items, such as prime rib and seafood, which are not
generally available in family restaurants. To reinforce its traditional
positioning, Carrows has recently introduced such items as Smoky Mountain BBQ
Ribs and Grilled Pork Chops, as well as a homestyle side dish program at dinner
called "Fixin's" that allows guests to customize their entrees with fresh,
made-from-scratch side orders such as mashed potatoes, stuffing, creamed spinach
and a vegetable casserole.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. The Company develops approximately 25 to 35 new
products each year and reviews its menus twice each year to replace slow-moving
items with new products. To develop new products, the Company's market research,
food and beverage and marketing departments for each chain conceive new ideas
from trade magazines, other restaurant formats and market research. Selected
ideas are initially exposed to consumers as written "concepts" in consumer
research. Those ideas with the greatest consumer appeal are then developed into
products, and are placed into a limited number of restaurants for testing to
determine consumer acceptance of the product as well as operational feasibility.
Products which are successful are then introduced into all restaurants (with a
menu insert at Carrows, or a flyer handout at Coco's) as a "special" or
promotion. These items remain on promotion for 8-12 weeks, at which point the
most successful items are added to the menu. While research and development
activities are important to the Company's business, amounts expended for these
activities are not material.
MARKETING
Media advertising is a large part of the integrated process that the
Company uses to market its concepts. The Company also uses its menu strategy,
interior/exterior building design, employee uniforms, style of service, and
specialized promotions to help differentiate itself from its competition. Media
advertising for both Coco's and Carrows is primarily product oriented, featuring
high margin, special entrees presented and priced to convey high value. Coco's
advertising typically features dinner entrees while also mentioning its pie
selections. Carrows advertising focuses on the breakfast and dinner dayparts.
Both concepts reinforce the idea that they are the restaurant of choice for all
dining occasions (i.e. breakfast, lunch, dinner, families, seniors, healthy
options). Recently, the Company engaged a Hispanic advertising agency in
recognition of the importance of the Hispanic customer to its business. The
Company's first Spanish language media, as well as Spanish menus, will be
introduced in early 1997.
RAW MATERIAL SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY
The Company uses Flagstar's purchasing department to obtain high quality
ingredients at the most favorable prices and to make centralized purchasing
arrangements for the main ingredients, supplies and equipment needs of all
Coco's and Carrows restaurants. Flagstar's size provides the Company with
significant purchasing power which often enables it to obtain products at
favorable prices from several nationally recognized distributors to service its
restaurants. Orders are placed with distributors by the restaurant managers and
deliveries are typically made two to three times per week. This strategy allows
the Company to minimize warehousing and transportation expenses and to greatly
reduce spoilage and inventory expenses.
On November 1, 1997, the Company will become subject to an eight year
distribution agreement with Proficient Food Company ("PFC") (a former subsidiary
of Flagstar which was sold in 1995 and with which Flagstar's other restaurant
concepts also have distribution agreements). Pursuant to the agreement, PFC will
distribute and supply certain products to the Company. Although there will be no
volume requirements, the agreement will require that named products be purchased
through PFC unless PFC is unable to make delivery within a reasonable period.
4
<PAGE>
The Company believes that satisfactory sources of supply are generally
available for all the items regularly used by its restaurants and has not
experienced any material shortages of food, equipment, or other products which
are necessary to restaurant operations.
SEASONALITY
The Company's business is moderately seasonal. Restaurant sales are
generally greater in the second and third calendar quarters (April through
September) than in the first and fourth calendar quarters (October through
March) due to the travel/vacation schedules of the Company's target customer
base. Occupancy and other operating costs, which remain relatively constant,
have a disproportionately negative effect on operating results during quarters
with lower restaurant sales. The Company's working capital requirements also
fluctuate seasonally, with its greatest needs occurring during its first and
fourth quarters.
TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS
The Company, either directly or through its wholly-owned subsidiary, has
registered certain trademarks and service marks with the United States Patent
and Trademark office and in international jurisdictions. The Company regards its
trademarks and service marks as important to the identification of its
restaurants and believes they are of material importance to the conduct of its
business. Domestic trademark and service mark registrations are renewable at
various intervals from 10 to 20 years, while international trademark and service
mark registrations have various durations from five to 20 years. The Company
generally intends to renew trademarks and service marks which come up for
renewal. The Company owns or has rights to all trademarks it believes are
material to its restaurant operations.
COMPETITION
The restaurant business is highly competitive and is affected by changes in
the public's eating habits and preferences, population trends and traffic
patterns, and local and national economic conditions affecting consumer spending
habits. Key competitive factors in the industry are the quality and value of the
food products offered, quality and speed of service, advertising, name
identification, attractiveness of facilities and restaurant location. The
Company's restaurants compete with a variety of restaurants ranging from
national and regional restaurant chains to locally owned restaurants.
Management believes the Company's principal competitive strengths include
the Company's brand name recognition; the value, variety and quality of food
products served; the quality and training of its employees; and the Company's
market penetration, which has resulted in economies of scale in a variety of
areas, including advertising, distribution and field supervision.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company and its franchisees are subject to various local, state and
Federal laws and regulations governing various aspects of the restaurant
business, including, but not limited to, health, sanitation, environmental
matters, safety, disabled persons' access to its restaurant facilities, the sale
of alcoholic beverages and hiring and employment practices. The operation of the
Company's franchisee system is also subject to regulations enacted by a number
of states and rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission. The Company
believes that it is in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations,
but it cannot predict the effect on operations of the enactment of additional
requirements in the future.
The Company is subject to Federal and state laws governing matters such as
minimum wages, overtime and other working conditions. At December 26, 1996,
approximately 56% of the Company's employees were paid at minimum wage.
Accordingly, increases in the minimum wage or decreases in the allowable tip
credit (which reduces the minimum wage that must be paid to tipped employees in
certain states) increase the Company's labor costs. This is especially true in
California, where there is no tip credit. In November, 1996, an initiative in
California was passed raising the minimum wage in California from $4.25 to $5.00
per hour, effective March 1, 1997, and to $5.75 per hour effective March 1,
1998. Also, the Federal minimum wage increased from $4.25 per hour to $4.75 per
hour on October 1, 1996 and will rise again to $5.15 per hour on September 1,
1997. Employers must pay the higher of the Federal or state minimum wage. The
Company will attempt to offset increases in the minimum wage through pricing and
other cost control efforts; however, there can be no assurance that the Company
or its franchisees will be able to pass such additional costs on to its
customers.
5
<PAGE>
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations have not
historically had a material impact on the operations of the Company; however,
the Company cannot predict the effect on its operations of possible future
environmental legislation or regulations.
EMPLOYEES
At December 26, 1996, the Company had a total of approximately 16,000
employees, none of which were covered by union contracts. Many of the Company's
restaurant employees work part-time and many are paid at or slightly above
minimum wage levels. The Company has experienced no significant work stoppages
and believes that its relationship with its employees is satisfactory.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
At December 26, 1996, the Company operated 343 restaurants owned or leased
by the Company in ten states. Approximately 74% of the Company's 343 restaurants
are located in California, making the Company the second largest family
restaurant chain in California in terms of number of restaurants. Most of the
restaurants are free standing units ranging from 5000 to 6000 square feet
allowing them to accommodate 120 to 180 guests. Set forth below is a breakout of
Company-operated restaurants by state:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF RESTAURANTS
STATE COCO'S CARROWS TOTAL %
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
California............................................................................... 135 120 255 74.3%
Arizona.................................................................................. 17 9 26 7.5
Texas.................................................................................... 14(a) 10 24 7.2
Oregon................................................................................... -- 9 9 2.6
Nevada................................................................................... -- 7(b) 7 2.0
Washington............................................................................... 6 1 7 2.0
Colorado................................................................................. 6 -- 6 1.7
New Mexico............................................................................... -- 4 4 1.2
Indiana.................................................................................. 3(c) -- 3 0.9
Missouri................................................................................. 2 -- 2 0.6
Total.................................................................................. 183 160 343 100.0%
</TABLE>
(a) Includes 14 jojos restaurants which are similar in format to Coco's.
(b) Includes one Jeremiah's restaurant, a midscale family-steak restaurant.
(c) Includes three jojos restaurants.
The Company completed the sale/leaseback of most of its owned restaurants
during the first quarter of 1996.
Of the 343 restaurants operated and owned or leased by the Company as of
December 26, 1996, the Company owned the land and building for five, owned the
building and leased the land for 49, and leased both land and building for the
remaining 289 restaurants. Most of the leases provide for the payment of a base
rent or approximately 5% to 6% of gross sales, whichever is greater.
In addition to the restaurant locations set forth above, the Company's
properties include (i) two office buildings located in Irvine, California and
(ii) various other regional offices and warehouses which are leased. The Company
shares a 54,000 square foot office building with FRI located in Irvine,
California, pursuant to a lease that expires in April 1997. Rent and occupancy
expenses are split evenly between the Company and FRI. In April, 1997 the
Company will relocate its corporate offices to another building in Irvine,
California which is leased by Flagstar. Prior to its sale on February 26, 1997,
the Company owned a 107,000 square foot building located in Irvine, California
which was used for a commissary (50,000 sq. ft.), warehouse (25,000 sq. ft.) and
office space currently occupied by FRI (32,000 sq. ft.).
Substantially all of the Company's properties and assets are pledged to
secure indebtedness under the Credit Agreement. See "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions -- The Credit Agreement."
6
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is from time to time involved in routine litigation incidental
to the conduct of its business. The Company believes that no currently pending
litigation to which it is a party will have a material adverse effect on its
liquidity, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Flagstar. As a result, there is
no established public trading market for the Company's common stock and all per
share data is omitted. As of February 25, 1997, 1,000 shares of the Company's
common stock were outstanding, all of which are owned by Flagstar.
Dividends were not paid by the Company during 1995 or 1996. See
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources" and Note 6 to the accompanying
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements of the Company regarding certain
restrictions on the payment of dividends.
7
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Set forth below are certain selected financial data of the FRD Successor
for the seven month period ended December 26, 1996, of the FRD Predecessor for
the five month period ended May 23, 1996 and fiscal years 1995 and 1994 and of
the FRI Predecessor for fiscal years 1993 and 1992. Information for fiscal year
1992 was derived from unaudited financial statements which, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items)
necessary to present fairly, in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, the information contained therein. The following should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and Notes
thereto presented elsewhere herein and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations". Because FRD is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Flagstar, per share data is not meaningful and has been omitted.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRD
SUCCESSOR FRD PREDECESSOR FRI PREDECESSOR
SEVEN FIVE
MONTHS MONTHS
ENDED ENDED FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DEC. 26, MAY 23, DECEMBER (A),
1996 1996 1995 (B) 1994 (C) 1993 1992
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<CAPTION>
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING STATEMENT DATA:
Operating revenues............................. $ 295,044 $195,943 $505,619 $510,102 $492,077 $ 443,185
Operating income............................... 11,947 2,482 32,025 31,192 30,522 23,486
Interest and debt expenses..................... 17,680 4,658(d) 16,515(d) 6,934(d) 4,594 4,852
Net income (loss).............................. (6,189) 1,101 4,724 10,111 15,236 10,899
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (e)......... .7x 1.7x 1.7x 3.9x 6.6x 4.8x
SELECTED OPERATING DATA:
Depreciation and amortization of property...... $ 15,055 $ 9,972 $ 22,547 $ 18,438(f) $ 9,241 $ 8,416
Amortization of goodwill and other
intangibles................................. 3,451 2,399 5,900 5,561(f) 801 703
Capital expenditures........................... 2,746 2,216 22,890 24,154 14,720 85,231(g)
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AS OF
DEC. 26, AS OF DECEMBER (A)
1996 (J) 1995 1994 1993 1992
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital deficiency (h).......................... $ (55,736) $ (110,979) $ (106,223) $(46,293) $ (47,397)
Net property............................................ 134,976 146,042 165,285 78,471 73,369
Total assets............................................ 388,046 332,847 350,993 135,843 130,394
Long-term debt, excluding current portion............... 218,497 27,502 32,499 34,605 36,116
Stockholder's equity (i)................................ 68,811 152,601 192,354 31,852 23,823
</TABLE>
(a) The four most recently completed fiscal years ended on December 31, 1995,
December 25, 1994, December 26, 1993 and December 28, 1992.
(b) Fiscal 1995 represents a 53 week period.
(c) Data presented for 1994 includes one month of financial information for the
FRI Predecessor prior to FRI's reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code and eleven months of financial information for the FRD
Predecessor following such reorganization. In January 1994, FRI's
predecessor corporation, REG, completed the Reorganization and applied the
provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") 90-7. Pursuant to SOP 90-7, REG
qualified for fresh start reporting as of January 27, 1994. Under this
concept, all assets and liabilities of FRI were restated to current value at
the date of reorganization. FRI obtained an appraisal of the assets and
liabilities of FRI and the FRD Predecessor establishing the reorganization
value (i.e., fair value) of the assets and liabilities. FRI utilized the
results of this appraisal to implement fresh start reporting, which resulted
in a reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable
assets of $155,540,000 to the FRD Predecessor at January 27, 1994. For the
eleven months ended December 25, 1994, FRD Predecessor's operating statement
and selected operating data consisted of operating revenues of $466,025,000,
operating income of $29,543,000, interest and debt expenses of $6,476,000,
net income of $9,394,000, ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 3.9x,
depreciation and amortization of property of $17,741,000, amortization of
intangibles of $5,480,000 and capital expenditures of $23,742,000. For the
one month ended January 26, 1994, the FRI Predecessor's operating statement
and selected operating data consisted of operating revenues of
8
<PAGE>
$44,077,000, operating income of $1,649,000, interest and debt expenses of
$458,000, net income of $717,000, ratio of earnings to fixed charges of
3.7x, depreciation and amortization of property of $697,000, amortization of
goodwill and other intangibles of $81,000 and capital expenditures of
$412,000.
(d) Includes $4,260,000, $13,117,000, and $3,033,000 of interest related to FRD
Predecessor's outstanding balance under the working capital portion of FRI's
credit agreement used to fund operating cash flow needs for all of FRI's
subsidiaries for the five months ended May 23, 1996 and fiscal years 1995
and 1994, respectively.
(e) For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "fixed
charges" consist of interest on debt, amortization of deferred financing
costs and the interest element in rental payments under operating and
capital leases. "Earnings" consist of income from operations before income
taxes, plus fixed charges.
(f) In connection with the Reorganization in January 1994, the Company restated
all assets and liabilities, which resulted in a reorganization value of FRD
Predecessor at January 27, 1994 in excess of amounts allocable to
identifiable assets of $155,540,000.
(g) Includes $67,904,000 related to the acquisition of 109 Bob's restaurants in
February 1992.
(h) The Company historically operates with a working capital deficiency because
(i) restaurant operations are conducted primarily on a cash (and cash
equivalent) basis with a low level of accounts receivable, (ii) rapid
turnover allows a limited investment in inventories and (iii) cash from
sales is usually received before related accounts payable for food, beverage
and supplies become due.
(i) The predecessor financial information presented represents a combination of
certain subsidiaries and divisions of FRI and does not represent a legal
entity. Therefore, stockholder's equity represents the net activity with
FRI.
(j) The December 26, 1996 data reflects the impact of the acquisition of FRI-M
by FRD, including, but not limited to, the issuance of $156.9 million of
senior notes, a $56.0 million term loan and the impact of the application of
purchase accounting.
9
<PAGE>
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Introduction
The Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis is principally divided
into two sections. The first section analyzes the results of operations. The
second section addresses the Company's liquidity and capital resources. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with "Selected Financial Data" and the
Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and other more detailed financial
information appearing elsewhere herein.
Results of Operations
As discussed herein, operating results for the year ended December 26, 1996
reflect the sum of the seven months ended December 26, 1996 (FRD Successor) and
the five months ended May 23, 1996 (FRD Predecessor). Operating results for the
year ended December 31, 1995 reflect the operations of FRD Predecessor.
Operating results for the year ended December 25, 1994 reflect the sum of the
operations of FRD Predecessor for the eleven months ended December 25, 1994 and
the operations of FRI Predecessor for the one month ended January 26, 1994.
1996 Restaurant Unit Activity
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ending Ending
Units Units Units Units
12/31/95 Opened Closed 12/26/96
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Coco's
Company Owned...................................................................... 188 -- (5) 183
Franchised Units................................................................... 6 -- (1) 5
Int'l Licensees.................................................................... 252 26 -- 278
446 26 (6) 466
Carrows.............................................................................. 161 2 (3) 160
607 28 (9) 626
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Coco's 1996 1995(a) 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
($ in thousands)
Net Company Sales................................................................. $ 269,903 $ 282,251 $ 288,494
Franchise and Foreign Licensing Revenue........................................... 3,792 4,371 5,927
Total Revenue..................................................................... $ 273,695 $ 286,622 $ 294,421
Comparable Store Sales (Decrease) Increase........................................ (1.6)% (5.0)% 1.5%
Average Unit Data:
Average Annual Unit Sales ($ in thousands)...................................... $ 1,462 $ 1,506 $ 1,520
Average Check................................................................... $ 6.79 $ 6.72 $ 6.52
Average Weekly Customer Count Per Restaurant.................................... 4,159 4,271 4,579
Number of Restaurants (end of period)
Owned...................................................................... 183(b) 188 187
Franchised................................................................. 5 6 5
International licensed..................................................... 278 252 214
Total................................................................... 466 446 406
</TABLE>
(a) Fiscal 1995 represents a 53 week period.
(b) Includes the Company's jojos restaurants (17 as of December 26, 1996).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Carrows 1996 1995(a) 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited)
($ in thousands)
Net Company Sales................................................................. $ 217,292 $ 218,997 $ 215,681
Comparable Store Sales Increase (Decrease)........................................ 0.1% (0.2)% 1.0%
Average Unit Data:
Average Annual Unit Sales ($ in thousands)...................................... $ 1,343 $ 1,372 $ 1,351
Average Check................................................................... $ 6.26 $ 6.09 $ 5.80
Average Weekly Customer Count Per Restaurant.................................... 4,252 4,363 4,473
Number of Restaurants Owned (end of period)....................................... 160 161 163
</TABLE>
(a) Fiscal 1995 represents a 53 week period.
10
<PAGE>
Fiscal 1996 to Fiscal 1995
Net Company Sales for the twelve months ended December 26, 1996 decreased
$14.1 million (2.8%) as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1995.
This decrease can be attributed to several factors, the most significant being
the impact of an extra week of sales in the prior year (approximately $7.0
million) which was a 53 week period in comparison to the current year which is a
52 week period. In addition, the Company experienced a six unit decrease in the
number of Company-owned restaurants accompanied by a decline in comparable store
sales for Coco's of 1.6%, offset, in part, by a slight increase at Carrows of
0.1%. Customer counts for Coco's and Carrows decreased during the 1996 period by
2.6% as compared to the prior year period. Such decrease is primarily due to a
general softness in the mid-scale restaurant segment. These decreases are
partially offset by increases in guest check average of 1.0% at Coco's and 2.8%
at Carrows which are mainly driven by suggestive selling of promoted dessert
items as well as a slight price increase taken in the fourth quarter to offset
the negative impact of the Federal minimum wage increase.
Franchise and foreign licensing revenue decreased by $0.6 million in 1996
as compared to 1995. This decrease is primarily due to a stronger dollar versus
the yen in 1996 as compared with 1995 and a lower royalty rate under Coco's
foreign license agreement effective February 1995. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in the number of franchisees and foreign
licensees from 257 in 1995 to 283 in 1996.
Operating expenses for the twelve months ended December 26, 1996 increased
$3.0 million (.6%) as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1995.
This increase reflects decreased expenses due to the decrease in operating
revenue noted above, offset by increases in workers' compensation expense ($2.0
million), depreciation and amortization ($2.5 million), management fees payable
to Flagstar ($3.0 million), and other operating expenses ($5.0 million). The
increase in workers' compensation expense is due mainly to revised claim loss
estimates, while the increase in depreciation and amortization is due
principally to a full year's depreciation being recorded on prior year property
additions. The management fees payable to Flagstar of $3.0 million are pursuant
to the management services agreement between the Company and Flagstar, dated May
24, 1996. Under such agreement, the Company is charged a management services fee
by Flagstar equal to 1% of total revenues. The impact of revaluing assets in
conjunction with the May 23, 1996 acquisition was not significant on operating
earnings, due to the relatively longer life assigned to goodwill of FRD
Successor as compared to the reorganization value of FRD Predecessor and the
relatively minor adjustments to the carrying values of fixed assets. The other
operating expense increase is primarily due to increases in rent ($1.9 million)
in connection with several sale/leaseback transactions that occurred in the
first quarter of 1995, expenses of $2.0 million related to the information
systems conversion which began subsequent to the acquisition by Flagstar and
litigation reserves ($1.1 million) established during the five months ended May
23, 1996, for various litigation facing the Company.
Operating income for the twelve months ended December 26, 1996 decreased
$17.6 million (54.9%) as compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 1995
due to the revenue decrease and expense increase noted above.
Interest and debt expense increased $5.8 million (35.3%) in 1996 as
compared to 1995. This increase is due to the long-term debt incurred in
connection with the acquisition of FRI-M, effective May 23, 1996 and because of
the revaluation of the liability associated with capitalized lease obligations.
Other non-operating income, net, totaled $5.4 million in 1996 as compared
to other non-operating expense, net, of $4.1 million in 1995. The 1996
non-operating income, net, is principally the result of a $5.9 million gain on
the sale of one Carrows restaurant in Las Vegas, Nevada during the five months
ended May 23, 1996. The non-operating expense, net, in 1995 relates principally
to the loss on the sale of forward hedge contracts.
The decrease in net income of $9.8 million in comparison to the prior year
is due to a combination of the above described items.
Fiscal 1995 to Fiscal 1994
Net Company Sales for 1995 decreased by approximately $4.5 million (0.9%)
as compared with the twelve months ended December 25, 1994. This decrease is
attributable to a reduction in the number of Company-owned restaurants (349
restaurants in 1995 as compared to 350 restaurants in 1994), as well as a
decrease in comparable store sales. Coco's and Carrows experienced a decrease in
comparable store sales in 1995 compared to 1994 of 5.0% and 0.2%, respectively.
Coco's average weekly customer count per restaurant decreased by 6.7% in 1995 as
compared to 1994, while Carrows average weekly customer count decreased by 2.5%
in 1995 compared to 1994. These decreases in customer count were partially
offset by increases in average guest check for Coco's and Carrows of 3.1% and
5.0%, respectively, in 1995 as compared to 1994. The decrease in traffic during
1995 resulted from intense competition and discounting in the family-style
11
<PAGE>
restaurant category. In addition, the California economy continued generally to
experience weakness in 1995. In January, 1995, California required all
restaurants to be non-smoking and the Company believes this legislation had a
substantial negative impact on traffic in the Company's restaurants since 75% of
the Company's restaurants are located in California. These decreases in 1995
operating revenues were partially offset by the impact of an extra week of sales
in 1995, which was a 53 week period in comparison to a 52 week period in 1994.
Franchise and foreign licensing revenue decreased by $1.6 million in 1995
as compared to 1994. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in the
weighted average royalty rate paid by franchisees from 1.67% in 1994 to .85% for
the majority of 1995, which is partially offset by an increase in fees due to
the increase in the number of units during the year.
Overall operating expenses decreased by $5.3 million in 1995 as compared to
1994. This reflects a decrease in payroll and benefits of $6.6 million due
principally to improved efficiencies in labor and related fringe benefits and
the effects of the decrease in operating revenues noted above partially offset
by increased depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $4.5 million
as a result of the asset revaluation related to the Reorganization and the 1994
remodeling activities.
Interest and debt expense increased by $9.6 million (138%) in 1995 as
compared to 1994. This increase was due to an increase in working capital
borrowings under the credit facility which was used to fund operating cash flow
needs of all FRI subsidiaries.
Operating income increased by $0.8 million (2.7%) in 1995 compared to 1994
as a result of the factors discussed above.
The decrease in net income of $5.4 million (53.3%) was due to a combination
of the above-described items.
Exposure to Currency Fluctuations
The Company is the licensor of Coco's restaurants in Japan and Korea
through a licensing agreement. The royalty due to the Company is paid annually
in yen and is based on sales attributable to such Coco's. Because the royalty is
paid annually in February, the Company bears the risk that exchange rate
fluctuations could have an unfavorable impact on this receivable. At December
26, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the Company had $2.8 million and $3.3 million,
respectively, due under this arrangement.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In connection with the acquisition of FRI-M, the Company entered into a
credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") on May 23, 1996 which provides for a
$56 million term loan (the "Term Loan") and a $35 million working capital and
letter of credit facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). At December 26,
1996, the Company had no outstanding working capital borrowings; however,
letters of credit outstanding were $20.8 million. Such facility is unavailable
to Flagstar and its other subsidiaries.
Also in connection with the acquisition, FRD issued $156.9 million
principal amount of 12 1/2% Series B Senior Notes due 2004 (the "Senior Notes").
The Senior Notes mature on July 15, 2004.
The Credit Agreement and indentures under which the Senior Notes have been
issued contain a number of restrictive covenants which, among other things
(subject to certain exceptions), limit FRD and its subsidiaries with respect to
incurrence of debt, existence of liens, investments and joint ventures, the
declaration or payment of dividends, the making of guarantees and other
contingent obligations, mergers, the sale of assets, capital expenditures and
material changes in their business. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains
certain financial covenants including provisions for the maintenance of a
minimum level of interest coverage (as defined), limitations on ratios of
indebtedness (as defined) to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), maintenance of a minimum level of EBITDA and limitations
on annual capital expenditures.
The Company was in compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement at
December 26, 1996. Under the most restrictive provision of the Credit Agreement
(the ratio of consolidated adjusted EBITDA to interest expense), at December 26,
1996, the Company's consolidated EBITDA for the six months ended December 26,
1996 could be $5.6 million less and the Company would still be in compliance.
12
<PAGE>
At December 26, 1996, scheduled debt maturities of long-term debt,
including capitalized lease obligations, for the next five years and thereafter
are as follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997.......................................................................... $ 19,578
1998.......................................................................... 23,628
1999.......................................................................... 23,686
2000.......................................................................... 3,404
2001.......................................................................... 3,146
Thereafter.................................................................... 164,633
$238,075
</TABLE>
At December 26, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the Company had working capital
deficits of $55.7 million and $111.0 million, respectively. The decrease in such
deficit is attributable primarily to the fact that at December 31, 1995, the FRD
Predecessor had significant current notes payable to banks that were used to
fund the operating cash flow needs of all FRI subsidiaries. Conversely, FRD's
debt at December 26, 1996 (the majority of which is acquisition related) is
primarily non-current. The Company is able to operate with a substantial working
capital deficiency because: (i) restaurant operations are conducted on a cash
(and cash equivalent) basis with a low level of accounts receivable; (ii) rapid
turnover allows a limited investment in inventories; and (iii) accounts payable
for food, beverages, and supplies usually become due after the receipt of cash
from related sales.
The Company intends to continue to operate with working capital
deficiencies and to rely upon internally generated funds and borrowings under
the Credit Agreement to finance its daily restaurant operations.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule which
appears on page F-1 herein.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required by this item is omitted pursuant to General
Instruction (I)(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is omitted pursuant to General
Instruction (I)(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item is omitted pursuant to General
Instruction (I)(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item is omitted pursuant to General
Instruction (I)(2)(c) of Form 10-K.
Description of Indebtedness
The following summary of the principal terms of the current indebtedness of
the Company does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the documents governing such indebtedness, including the
definitions of certain terms therein, which have been filed as exhibits to this
1996 Annual Report on form 10-K. Whenever particular provisions of such
documents are referred to herein, such provisions are incorporated herein by
reference and the statements are qualified in their entirety by such reference.
The Credit Agreement
In connection with the acquisition of FRI-M by FRD, the Credit Agreement
was entered into as of May 23, 1996 among FRD, as guarantor, FRI-M, as borrower
(the "Borrower"), Bankers Trust Company, Chemical Bank and Citicorp
13
<PAGE>
USA, Inc., as Co-Syndication Agents (collectively, the "Co-Agents"), Credit
Lyonnais New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and the other lenders party
thereto (collectively, the "Banks"). The Credit Agreement provides for a $56
million Term Loan and a $35 million Revolving Credit Facility, which is also
available for letters of credit. Proceeds from the Term Loan were used by FRD
for the acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of FRI-M
and its subsidiaries, and to pay the transactions costs associated therewith.
Proceeds from the Revolving Credit Facility are to be used for working capital
requirements and other general corporate purposes, which may include the making
of intercompany loans to any of the Borrower's wholly-owned subsidiaries for
their own working capital and other general corporate purposes. Letters of
credit may be issued under the Revolving Credit Facility for the purpose of
supporting (i) workers' compensation liabilities of the Borrower or any of its
subsidiaries; (ii) the obligations of third party insurers of the Borrower or
any of its subsidiaries; and (iii) certain other obligations of the Borrower and
its subsidiaries.
Principal installments of the Term Loan are payable quarterly as follows:
$4 million per quarter for four consecutive quarters beginning February 28,
1997; $5 million for four consecutive quarters beginning February 28, 1998; $6
million on February 28, 1999; and $7 million for two consecutive quarters
beginning May 31, 1999. All amounts owing under the Term Loan are required to be
repaid on August 31, 1999. The commitment to make loans or issue letters of
credit pursuant to the Revolving Credit Facility expires, and all amounts
outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility must be repaid, on August 31,
1999. All borrowings under the Credit Agreement accrue interest at a variable
rate based on a base rate (as defined therein) or an adjusted Eurodollar rate.
The rate at December 26, 1996 was 8.125%.
The Credit Agreement requires the Borrower to make mandatory prepayments in
certain circumstances out of its Consolidated Excess Cash Flow (as defined
therein), out of cash proceeds of certain asset sales, out of assets distributed
to the Company, the Borrower or any of Borrower's direct or indirect
subsidiaries (each, a "Loan Party") in connection with an employee benefit plan
termination and out of net cash proceeds received by a Loan Party from certain
other sources. Any mandatory partial prepayment of the Term Loan shall be
applied to installments scheduled to be paid during the twelve months
immediately following the date of such prepayment, with any excess being applied
ratably to the scheduled installments of the Term Loan.
The Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which, among
other things, limit (subject to certain exceptions) the Borrower and its
subsidiaries with respect to (a) incurrence of debt; (b) the existence of liens;
(c) investments and joint ventures; (d) the declaration or payment of dividends;
(e) the making of guarantees and other contingent obligations; (f) the amendment
or waiver of certain related agreements; (g) mergers, consolidations,
liquidations and sales of assets (including sale and leaseback transactions);
(h) payment obligations under leases; (i) transactions with shareholders and
affiliates; (j) the sale, assignment, pledge or other disposition of shares of
Borrower or its subsidiaries by Borrower or its subsidiaries; (k) capital
expenditures; and (l) material changes in their business.
The Credit Agreement also imposes on FRD, the Borrower and its subsidiaries
certain financial tests and minimum ratios which, among other things, require
that Borrower (a) shall not permit the ratio determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter for such quarter and, as applicable, the three preceding quarters
("Rolling Period") then ended of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined
therein) to Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined therein) to be less than
levels increasing from 1.50:1.00 on September 26, 1996 to 2.10:1.00 on September
23, 1999 and each fiscal quarter end thereafter; (b) permit the ratio determined
on the last day of each fiscal quarter for the Rolling Period then ended of
Consolidated Total Debt (as defined therein) to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as
defined) to exceed a level varying from 5.65:1.00 on September 26, 1996 to
3.65:1.00 on September 23, 1999 and each fiscal quarter end thereafter; and (c)
shall not permit Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter to be less than an amount increasing from $11.2 million for the
fiscal quarter ending September 26, 1996 to $49.5 million for the Rolling
Period ending June 25, 1998 and each Rolling Period thereafter.
FRD and all of the Borrower's subsidiaries have guaranteed the obligations
of the Borrower under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents (as
defined therein). All of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Borrower
and its subsidiaries has been pledged as security for the obligations of the
Company under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents. The obligations
of the Borrower under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents are
secured by substantially all assets of the Borrower and its subsidiaries.
The Senior Notes
In connection with the acquisition of FRI-M, FRD issued $156.9 million
principal amount of 12 1/2% Senior Notes due 2004 (the "Notes"). Interest on the
Notes accrues at the rate of 12 1/2% per annum and will be payable semi-annually
in arrears on January 15 and July 15, commencing on July 15, 1996. They will
mature on July 15, 2004. The Notes are
14
<PAGE>
senior, unsecured, general obligations of the Company and rank senior in right
of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company
and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future
unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Notes are effectively
subordinated to secured indebtedness of the Company, including borrowings under
the Credit Agreement, to the extent of the value of the Company's assets
securing such indebtedness. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are secured by
substantially all of the Company's assets. The Company on a stand alone basis
does not currently have any outstanding senior indebtedness other than the Notes
and its guaranty of FRI-M's borrowings under the Credit Agreement. As of
December 26, 1996, FRI-M had no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving
Credit Facility. (The Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of
the Borrower (as defined above), including its indebtedness under the Credit
Agreement.)
The Notes are not redeemable at the Company's option prior to May 23, 2001.
Thereafter, the Notes are subject to redemption at the option of the Company, in
whole or in part, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of
principal amount) set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning
on May 23 of the years indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Percentage
<S> <C>
2001......................................................................... 105.0%
2002......................................................................... 102.5%
2003 and thereafter.......................................................... 100.0%
</TABLE>
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time prior to May 23, 1999, the
Company may also redeem up to $50 million aggregate principal amount of the
Notes, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount)
set forth below, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the applicable
redemption date, with the Net Cash Proceeds (as defined) from one Initial Public
Equity Offering (as defined) of the Company, if redeemed during the twelve-month
period ending on May 23 of the years indicated below; provided that at least $60
million in aggregate principal amount of the Notes originally issued remain
outstanding immediately after such redemption and provided, further, that such
redemption occurs within 60 days of the date of receipt of such Net Cash
Proceeds:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Percentage
<S> <C>
1997......................................................................... 110.00%
1998......................................................................... 108.75%
1999......................................................................... 107.50%
</TABLE>
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) (1) Financial Statements:
See the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
which appears on page F-1 hereof.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
See the Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule
which appears on page F-1 hereof.
(3) Exhibits:
Certain of the exhibits to this report, indicated by an asterisk, are
hereby incorporated by reference to other documents on file with the
Commission with which they are physically filed, to be a part hereof as
of their respective dates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit No. Description
<C> <S>
*3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of FRD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statements on
Forms S-1 and S-4 dated as of September 6, 1996 (No. 333-07601) of FRD (the "FRD Form S-4")).
*3.2 Bylaws of FRD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the FRD Form S-4).
3.2.1 Amendment to the Bylaws of FRD, dated May 24, 1996.
*4.1 Indenture dated as of May 23, 1996 between FRD and the Bank of New York, as Trustee (the "Indenture")
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the FRD Form S-4).
*4.1.1 Form of First Supplemental Indenture to the Indenture dated as of August 23, 1996 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.1.1 to the FRD Form S-4).
*4.2 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 1, 1996 by and among Flagstar, FCI, FRD, and Family Restaurants,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the FRD Form S-4).
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit No. Description
<C> <S>
*4.3 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 23, 1996 between FRD and Family Restaurants, Inc. (the
"Registration Rights Agreement") (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the FRD Form S-4).
*4.3.1 First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 23, 1996 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3.1 to the FRD Form S-4).
*10.1 Credit Agreement dated as of May 23, 1996 by and among FRD, as Guarantor, FRI-M as Borrower, the Financial
Institutions listed therein, as lenders, Bankers Trust Company, Chemical Bank and Citicorp USA, Inc., as
co-syndication agents, and Credit Lyonnais New York Branch, as administrative agent (the "Credit Agreement")
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the FRD Form S-4).
*10.1.1 First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.1
to FRD's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 26, 1996 (the "1996 Form 10-Q")).
*10.1.2 Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated November 19, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24
to FCI's 1996 Form 10-K, File No. 0-18051).
*10.2 Tax Sharing and Allocation Agreement dated as of May 23, 1996 among FCI and the Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the FRD Form S-4).
*10.3 Management Services Agreement dated as of May 24, 1996 between FRD and Flagstar (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the FRD Form S-4).
*10.4 FCI 1989 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to FCI's 1995 Form 10-K,
File No. 0-18051).
*10.5 Technical Assistance and License Agreement, dated as of April 14, 1995, between Coco's Restaurant, Inc. And
Coco's Japan Co., Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the FRD Form S-4).
*10.6 Memorandum regarding employment arrangement between Flagstar and Mark Shipman (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the FRD Form S-4).
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
99 Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
</TABLE>
* Certain of the exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, indicated by
an asterisk, are hereby incorporated by reference to other documents on
file with the Commission with which they are physically filed, to be part
hereof as of their respective dates.
(b) FRD filed current reports on Form 8-K and 8-K/A dated as of December 2,
1996 reporting changes in the registrant's certifying accountant. This
filing reported a change in the registrant's principal independent
auditors from KPMG Peat Marwick LLP to Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities
Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.
No annual report or proxy material has been provided to the security
holders of FRD.
16
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors' Report -- Deloitte & Touche LLP.................................................................. F-2
Independent Auditors' Report -- KPMG Peat Marwick LLP.................................................................. F-3
Statement of Consolidated Operations for the Seven Months Ended December 26,1996, and the Statements of Combined
Operations for the Five Months Ended May 23, 1996, the Year Ended December 31, 1995, the Eleven Months Ended December
25, 1994, and the One Month Ended January 26, 1994................................................................... F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 26, 1996 and Combined Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 1995.................................................................................................... F-5
Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows for the Seven Months Ended December 26,1996 and Statements of Combined Cash Flows
for the Five Months Ended May 23, 1996, the Year Ended December 31, 1995, the Eleven Months Ended December 25, 1994,
and the One Month Ended January 26, 1994............................................................................. F-6
Notes to Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements................................................................ F-7
Financial Statement Schedule: Condensed Financial Information of Registrant............................................ S-1
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FRD ACQUISITION CO.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FRD
Acquisition Co. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 26, 1996, and
the related statements of consolidated operations and consolidated cash flows
for the seven months ended December 26, 1996. Our audit also included the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 26,
1996, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the seven months
ended December 26, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Greenville, South Carolina
February 13, 1997
F-2
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FRD ACQUISITION CO.:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of FRI-M, which
includes FRI-M Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Family Restaurants,
Inc. (The Parent), and certain subsidiaries including those restaurants that
make up the Family Restaurant Division and including the FRD Commissary
(collectively FRI-M or the Company) as of December 31, 1995 and the related
combined statements of operations and cash flows for the five months ended May
23, 1996, the year ended December 31, 1995, the eleven months ended December 25,
1994 (FRD Predecessor) and the one month ended January 26, 1994 (FRI
Predecessor). These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at
December 31, 1995 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
the five months ended May 23, 1996, the year ended December 31, 1995, the eleven
months ended December 25, 1994 (FRD Predecessor) and the one month ended January
26, 1994 (FRI Predecessor) in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
As discussed in note 1 to the combined financial statements, the Parent
commenced a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case on November 23, 1993, which was confirmed
by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January 7,
1994. Accordingly, the accompanying combined financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Statement of Position 90-7, "Financial Reporting for Entities in Reorganization
Under the Bankruptcy Code."
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Orange County, California
July 25, 1996
F-3
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED (SUCCESSOR) AND COMBINED (PREDECESSOR) OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRD FRD FRI
Successor Predecessor Predecessor
Seven Months Five Months Year Eleven Months One Month
Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended
December 26, May 23, December 31, December 25, January 26,
($ in thousands) 1996 1996 1995 1994 1994
Operating revenue............................... $295,044 $ 195,943 $505,619 $ 466,025 $44,077
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating expenses:
Product cost.................................. 83,519 54,370 143,206 131,436 12,946
Payroll and benefits.......................... 104,090 74,642 180,922 170,346 17,175
Depreciation and amortization................. 18,506 12,371 28,447 23,221 778
Management fees to Flagstar................... 2,950 -- -- -- --
Other......................................... 74,032 52,078 121,019 111,479 11,529
283,097 193,461 473,594 436,482 42,428
Operating income................................ 11,947 2,482 32,025 29,543 1,649
Other charges (credits):
Interest and debt expense -- net.............. 17,680 4,658 16,515 6,476 458
Other -- net.................................. (4) (5,437) 4,116 4,177 (58)
17,676 (779) 20,631 10,653 400
Income (loss) before taxes...................... (5,729) 3,261 11,394 18,890 1,249
Provision for income taxes...................... 460 2,160 6,670 9,496 532
Net income (loss)............................... $ (6,189) $ 1,101 $ 4,724 $ 9,394 $ 717
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements
F-4
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
CONSOLIDATED (SUCCESSOR) AND COMBINED (PREDECESSOR) BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRD FRD
Successor Predecessor
December 26, December 31,
($ in thousands) 1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................... $ 14,300 $ 5,497
Receivables................................................................................. 5,988 5,439
Merchandise and supply inventories.......................................................... 5,039 5,288
Net assets held for sale.................................................................... 5,065 13,248
Other....................................................................................... 4,468 2,240
34,860 31,712
Property and equipment........................................................................ 149,587 180,437
Accumulated depreciation...................................................................... (14,611) (34,395)
134,976 146,042
Goodwill, net................................................................................. 205,389 --
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net............... -- 145,352
Other......................................................................................... 12,821 9,741
Total assets................................................................................ $388,046 $332,847
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY/NET COMBINED EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Loans payable and current maturities of long-term debt...................................... $ 19,578 $ 84,730
Accounts payable............................................................................ 16,897 23,316
Accrued payroll and vacation................................................................ 14,189 13,894
Accrued insurance........................................................................... 6,832 6,815
Accrued interest............................................................................ 9,261 830
Payable to Flagstar......................................................................... 2,950 --
Other....................................................................................... 20,889 13,106
90,596 142,691
Long-term liabilities:
Debt, less current maturities............................................................... 218,497 27,502
Liability for self-insured claims........................................................... 10,142 10,053
228,639 37,555
319,235 180,246
Stockholder's Equity/Net Combined Equity
Common stock: par value $0.10; 1000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
Paid-in-capital............................................................................. 75,000 --
Deficit..................................................................................... (6,189) --
Net combined equity......................................................................... -- 152,601
Total stockholder's equity/net combined equity.............................................. 68,811 152,601
$388,046 $332,847
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements
F-5
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED (SUCCESSOR) AND COMBINED (PREDECESSOR) CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRD FRD FRI
Successor Predecessor Predecessor
Seven Months Five Months Year Eleven Months One Month
Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended
December 26, May 23, December 31, December 25, January 26,
($ in thousands) 1996 1996 1995 1994 1994
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)............................. $ (6,189) $ 1,101 $ 4,724 $ 9,394 $ 717
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property
and intangibles.......................... 18,506 12,371 28,447 23,221 778
Amortization of deferred financing
costs.................................... 816 -- 4,785 463 --
Loss (gain) on disposition of assets....... -- (5,738) 2,269 3,064 --
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Receivables................................ (2,226) 1,676 1,975 (486) 503
Merchandise and supply inventories......... 117 68 0 (377) 199
Other current assets....................... (4,105) (485) 775 (3,941) 3,365
Other assets............................... (989) 1,251 (2,888) -- --
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable........................... 610 (4,762) 4,386 (4,376) (312)
Accrued payroll and vacation............... 98 -- 766 -- --
Payable to Flagstar........................ 2,950 -- -- -- --
Other accrued liabilities.................. 10,964 (2,290) (2,364) 3,431 2,029
Self insurance reserves.................... 624 2,133 2,998 (1,776) (2,430)
Other non-current liabilities.............. 29 -- -- -- --
Net cash flows from operating activities........ 21,205 5,325 45,873 28,617 4,849
Cash Flows From (Used In) Investing Activities:
Purchase of property.......................... (2,746) (2,216) (23,771) (23,941) (412)
Proceeds from disposition of property......... -- 20,087 7,866 283 317
Acquisition of business....................... (128,056) -- -- -- --
Net cash flows from (used in) investing
activities.................................... (130,802) 17,871 (15,905) (23,658) (95)
Cash Flows From (Used In) Financing Activities:
Net intercompany and equity activity.......... -- 54,050 (44,477) (59,315) (4,425)
Principal debt borrowings..................... 56,000 -- -- -- --
Principal debt payments....................... (2,948) (81,755) 15,786 56,184 (686)
Equity contributions from Flagstar............ 75,000 -- -- -- --
Deferred financing costs...................... (5,143) -- -- -- --
Net cash flows from (used in) financing
activities.................................... 122,909 (27,705) (28,691) (3,131) (5,111)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents................................... 13,312 (4,509) 1,277 1,828 (357)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at:
Beginning of period........................ 988 5,497 4,220 2,392 2,749
End of period.............................. $ 14,300 $ 988 $ 5,497 $ 4,220 $ 2,392
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Income taxes paid............................. $ 80
Interest paid................................. $ 7,219
Non-cash financing activities:
Capital lease obligations.................. $ 101
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated and combined financial statements
F-6
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Organization and Basis of Presentation
FRD Acquisition Co. ("FRD" or, together with its subsidiaries, "the
Company") was incorporated in February 1996 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Flagstar Corporation ("Flagstar"), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Flagstar Companies, Inc. (FCI). On May 23, 1996, FRD consummated the acquisition
of the Coco's and Carrows restaurant chains consisting of 347 company-owned
units within the family dining segment. The acquisition price of $313.4 million
(which was paid in exchange for all of the outstanding stock of FRI-M
Corporation ("FRI-M"), the subsidiary of Family Restaurants, Inc. ("FRI"), which
owns the Coco's and Carrows chains), was financed with $125.0 million in cash
($75.0 million of which was provided from Flagstar's cash balances and the
remaining $50.0 million from bank term loans which totaled $56.0 million, with
$6 million being used to pay transaction fees), the issuance of $156.9 million
in senior notes of FRD to FRI, including an additional $6.9 million principal
amount of Senior Notes issued by the Company to FRI pursuant to the purchase
price adjustment provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement on September 4, 1996
and the assumption of certain capital lease obligations of approximately $31.5
million. The acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting.
In accordance with the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price
has been allocated to the underlying assets and liabilities of FRI-M based on
their estimated respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The purchase
price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired by approximately $209
million. The resulting goodwill is being amortized on a straight line basis over
40 years. This amount reflects a decrease from the original estimate of
approximately $12 million. This revision, which was recorded during the fourth
quarter of 1996, is primarily due to the completion of certain valuation and
other studies which were prepared in order to estimate the fair value of the net
assets acquired. No further revisions to the purchase price allocation are
expected except for the potential impact of adjustments related to deferred
income taxes, which are expected to be resolved in early 1997.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information shows the results
of operations of the Company as though the acquisition occurred as of December
26, 1994. These results include the amortization of the excess of purchase price
over net assets acquired over a 40-year period, a reduction of overhead expenses
due to anticipated cost savings and efficiencies from combining the operations
of Flagstar and the Company, and an increase in interest expense as a result of
the debt issued to finance the acquisition.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
December 26, December 31,
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
($ in thousands)
Revenue................................................... $490,987 $505,619
Net Loss.................................................. $ (6,917) $ (421)
</TABLE>
The pro forma financial information presented above does not purport to be
indicative of either (i) the results of operations, had the acquisition taken
place on December 26, 1994, or (ii) future results of operations.
The FRD Predecessor Company's combined financial statements combine the
financial position and operations of FRI-M, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FRI,
and certain subsidiaries including those restaurants that made up the Family
Restaurant Division and including the FRD Commissary, a division of FRI. The
Family Restaurant Division primarily represented the Coco's and Carrows
restaurant concepts. The FRI-M combined financial statements exclude the
financial position and operations of FRI-MRD Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of the FRI-M Corporation which was not acquired by FRD.
In the financial statements included herein, reference to "FRI Predecessor
Company" refers to the period of ownership of FRI-M by the Restaurant
Enterprises Group, Inc., ("REG") prior to January 27, 1994. Reference to the
"FRD Predecessor" refers to the period of ownership of FRI-M by FRI, giving
effect to information about events occurring upon FRI's emergence from a Chapter
11 bankruptcy code reorganization (the Reorganization) through May 23, 1996.
"FRD Successor" refers to the period of ownership of FRI-M by FRD subsequent to
May 23, 1996.
The combined financial statements of the FRI Predecessor Company were
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplated continuity of operations,
realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of
business.
F-7
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
While the reorganization plan was in process, FRI continued in possession of its
properties and operated and managed its business as a debtor-in-possession
pursuant to the bankruptcy code.
Pursuant to SOP-90-7, REG qualified for fresh start reporting as of January
27, 1994. Under this concept, all assets and liabilities of FRI were restated to
current value at the date of reorganization. FRI obtained an appraisal of the
assets and liabilities of the FRI Successor Company. This appraisal determined
the reorganization value (i.e., fair value) of the assets and liabilities of the
FRI Successor Company. The FRI Predecessor Company utilized the results of this
appraisal to implement fresh start reporting, which resulted in a reorganization
value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets of $155.5 million at
January 27, 1994.
The combined balance sheet of FRI-M as of December 31, 1995 and the
accompanying statements of combined operations and of combined cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1995 and the eleven months ended December 25, 1994
represent that of the FRI Successor Company. The accompanying statements of
combined operations and of combined cash flows for the one month ended January
26, 1994 represent that of the FRI Predecessor Company.
At December 26, 1996, the Company operated 343 full-service restaurants
located in 10 states, with approximately 74% of its restaurants located in
California. FRD restaurants primarily offer moderately priced breakfast, lunch
and dinner items. Additionally, as of December 26, 1996, the Company was the
licensor of 278 full-service restaurants in Japan and South Korea and the
franchisor of 5 family restaurants in the United States.
Certain 1996, 1995 and 1994 amounts as reported for the FRD Predecessor
Company have been reclassified to conform to the 1996 presentation for the
period of ownership by FRD.
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Fiscal Year Results of Operations for fiscal 1996, 1995, and 1994 are based
on the 52 weeks ended on the last Thursday in December, the 53 weeks ended on
the last Sunday in December, and the 52 weeks ended on the last Sunday in
December, respectively. The five months ended May 23, 1996 include 21 weeks,
while the seven months ended December 26, 1996 include 31 weeks.
(b) Principles of Consolidation and Combination The Consolidated Financial
Statements include the accounts of FRD, and its subsidiaries. The combined
financial statements include the accounts of the operations described in
"Organization and Basis of Presentation", including their affiliated
subsidiaries. All significant affiliated intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated.
(c) Financial Statement Estimates The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the revenues and expenses during the period
reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid debt instruments purchased with
an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash
equivalents.
(e) Inventories Inventories consist primarily of food and liquor and are stated
at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined using the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method.
(f) Pre-Opening Costs Certain direct incremental costs incurred in conjunction
with the opening of restaurants are capitalized and amortized over a twelve
month period beginning one month after the date of opening.
(g) Property and Equipment Property and equipment is stated at appraised value
at acquisition date or cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over
estimated useful lives (buildings principally over 20 to 31 years and furniture,
fixtures and equipment over 3 to 8 years). Prior to the acquisition date,
property and equipment of FRD Predecessor was depreciated on a straight-line
basis over estimated lives ranging from 25 to 35 years for buildings and 3 to 10
years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of estimated useful lives or
the terms of related leases. Property under capitalized leases is amortized over
the terms of the leases using the straight-line method.
F-8
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Continued
(h) Reorganization Value During the five months ended May 23, 1996, the year
ended December 31, 1995, and the eleven months ended December 25, 1994, the
reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets has
been amortized using the straight-line method over 30 years. Accumulated
amortization of reorganization value amounted to $10.2 million at December 31,
1995.
(i) Goodwill The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net
assets acquired and certain trademarks are being amortized over their estimated
useful life of 40 years on a straight-line basis. The Company assesses the
recoverability of goodwill by projecting future net income, before the effect of
amortization of intangibles, over the remaining amortization period of such
assets. Accumulated amortization of the excess of the purchase price over the
net assets acquired amounted to approximately $3.1 million at December 26, 1996.
(j) Debt Issuance Costs Costs related to the issuance of debt are deferred and
amortized as a component of interest and debt expense over the terms of the
respective debt issues using the interest method.
(k) Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 109, "Accounting for
Income Taxes". The Company is included in the consolidated Federal and certain
state income tax returns of FCI. As a result of the tax sharing agreement with
FCI, the FCI current Federal and the applicable state consolidated income tax
liabilities are allocated to the Company based on their current Federal and
state income tax liability as if they were filing separate Federal and state
income tax returns.
The accompanying predecessor combined financial statements for the periods
prior to May 23, 1996 combine the accounts of certain subsidiaries and divisions
and exclude some operations of the combined entities. Some combined entities
have not been taxable entities, but all have been included in the consolidated
income tax returns of the predecessor parent. For financial reporting purposes,
a pro forma tax expense has been provided at 40% of reported combined income
excluding amortization of certain intangible assets.
See Note 8 for a further description of the accounting for income taxes.
(l) Self-Insurance Reserves The Company is primarily self-insured, as was the
FRD Predecessor, for workers' compensation and general liability risks which are
supplemented by stop loss type insurance policies. The FRD Predecessor reflected
such reserves at their estimated undiscounted amounts. In conjunction with the
May 23, 1996 acquisition, the Company recorded its self-insurance liabilities
for estimated incurred losses at their estimated present value as of May 23,
1996 based on expected loss payment patterns determined by independent
actuaries, using a 4% discount rate. This change conforms the Company's method
of accounting for self-insurance reserves with that of Flagstar. The total
discounted self-insurance liabilities recorded at December 26, 1996 were $16.2
million, reflecting a 4% discount rate. The related undiscounted amount at such
date was $18.3 million.
(m) Franchise and License Fees Initial franchise and license fees are
recognized when all material services have been performed and conditions have
been satisfied. Initial fees for all periods presented are insignificant.
Monthly fees are accrued as earned based on the respective monthly net sales.
Such fees totaled $2.3 million for the seven months ended December 26, 1996,
$1.5 million for the five months ended May 23, 1996, $4.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 1995, $5.4 million for the eleven months ended December 25,
1994 and $0.5 million for the one month ended January 26, 1994.
(n) Advertising Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Such costs totaled
$9.9 million for the seven months ended December 26, 1996, $6.7 million for the
five months ended May 23, 1996, $16.3 million for the year ended December 31,
1995, $13.1 million for the eleven months ended December 25, 1994, and $1.3
million for the one month ended January 26, 1994.
(o) Cash Overdrafts The Company has included in accounts payable on the
accompanying balance sheets cash overdrafts totaling $4.9 million and $11.5
million at December 26, 1996 and December 31, 1995.
(p) Foreign Currency Exposure The Company is the licensor of Coco's restaurants
in Japan and Korea through a licensing agreement. The royalty due to the Company
is paid annually in yen and is based on sales attributable to such
F-9
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- Continued
Coco's. Because the royalty is paid annually in February, the Company has
exposure that exchange rates may fluctuate which could have an unfavorable
impact on the receivable. At December 26, 1996 and December 31, 1995, the
Company has $2.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively, due under this
arrangement.
NOTE 2: RECEIVABLES
A summary of receivables follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Trade, principally credit cards........................................ $1,521 $ 924
License and franchise fees and related receivables..................... 2,791 3,286
Receivable from distributors........................................... 709 645
Note receivable, net................................................... -- 31
Other, net............................................................. 967 553
$5,988 $5,439
</TABLE>
NOTE 3: NET ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Net Assets Held for Sale at December 26, 1996 represent one restaurant unit
and the White Road Facility in California, which includes the FRD Commissary.
These assets are expected to be sold during 1997. The assets are recorded at
their estimated fair value less costs to sell.
Net assets held for sale at December 31, 1995 consisted of certain
restaurants identified by the Company for sale/leaseback transactions.
NOTE 4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
A summary of property and equipment follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Land.............................................................. $ 2,383 $ 11,821
Buildings and improvements........................................ 91,251 110,385
Furniture, fixtures and equipment................................. 55,121 54,569
Projects under construction....................................... 832 3,662
149,587 180,437
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization.................... (14,611) (34,395)
$134,976 $146,042
</TABLE>
Property under capitalized leases in the amount of $31.2 million and $36.9
million at December 26, 1996 and December 31, 1995, respectively, is included in
buildings and improvements. Accumulated amortization of property under capital
leases amounted to $3.6 million and $8.8 million at December 26, 1996 and
December 31, 1995, respectively. Capital leases primarily relate to the building
on certain restaurants properties; the land portions of these leases are
accounted for as operating leases.
F-10
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT -- Continued
A majority of the capitalized and operating leases have original terms of
25 years, and substantially all of these leases expire in the year 2005 or
later. Most leases have renewal options. The leases generally provide for
payment of minimum annual rent, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance
and, in most cases, contingent rent, calculated as a percentage of sales, in
excess of minimum rent. The total amount of contingent rent under capitalized
leases for the seven months ended December 26, 1996, the five months ended May
23, 1996, the year ended December 31, 1995, the eleven months ended December 25,
1994, and the one month ended January 26, 1994 was $1.7 million, $0.8 million,
$3.1 million, $2.9 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. Total rental expense
for all operating leases comprised the following (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Seven Months Five Months Year Eleven Months One Month
Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended
December 26, May 23, December 31, December 25, January 26,
1996 1996 1995 1994 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Minimum Rent..................................... $ 9,183 $ 5,996 $ 12,568 $11,066 $ 845
Contingent Rent.................................. 2,800 1,386 2,245 1,621 113
Leased Equipment Rent............................ 618 534 1,343 1,810 189
Sublease Rent.................................... (150) (29) (321) (174) (5)
$ 12,451 $ 7,887 $ 15,835 $14,323 $ 1,142
</TABLE>
At December 26, 1996, the present value of capitalized lease obligations
and the future minimum lease payments on noncancelable operating leases were ($
in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Capital Leases
Minimum Lease Minimum Sublease Operating
Due in Payments Receipts Leases
<S> <C> <C> <C>
1997....................................................................... $ 6,360 $ 225 $ 14,426
1998....................................................................... 6,099 225 13,981
1999....................................................................... 5,698 225 13,366
2000....................................................................... 4,967 225 12,679
2001....................................................................... 4,303 194 11,067
Thereafter................................................................. 9,685 825 69,147
Total minimum lease payments........................................ 37,112 $1,919 $ 134,666
Less imputed interest...................................................... 12,078
Present value of minimum lease payments............................. $25,034
</TABLE>
Payments for certain FRD operating leases are being made by FRI in
accordance with the provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement. As such, these
payments have been excluded from the amount of minimum lease payments and
minimum sublease receipts reported above.
NOTE 5: OTHER ASSETS
A summary of other assets follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Debt issuance costs, net............................................. $ 4,327 $ --
Franchise operating rights, net...................................... 7,488 8,108
Liquor licenses...................................................... 407 411
Other................................................................ 599 1,222
$12,821 $9,741
</TABLE>
Franchise operating rights represent values assigned to the franchise and
licensing agreements based on royalty income streams. Franchise operating rights
as of December 26, 1996 are being amortized on a straight-line basis over
approximately 14 years, which is the estimated remaining useful life at the date
of the acquisition (May 23, 1996). Prior to
F-11
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 5: OTHER ASSETS -- Continued
the acquisition date, franchise operating rights for FRD Predecessor were
amortized on a straight line basis over 15 years. At December 26, 1996 and
December 31, 1995, accumulated amortization of franchise operating rights
totaled approximately $.4 million and $1.2 million respectively.
NOTE 6: DEBT
Long-term debt, including capitalized lease obligations, is comprised of
the following ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Revolving Credit Facility......................................... -- $ 79,815
12 1/2% Senior Notes due July 15, 2004, interest payable semi-
annually........................................................ $156,897 --
Term Loan, principal payable quarterly............................ 56,000 --
Capitalized lease obligations..................................... 25,034 31,453
Other............................................................. 144 964
Total............................................................. 238,075 112,232
Amount due within one year........................................ (19,578) (84,730)
$218,497 $ 27,502
</TABLE>
In connection with the acquisition of FRI-M, the Company entered into a
credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement") on May 23, 1996 which provides for a
$56.0 million term loan (the "Term Loan") and a $35.0 million revolving credit
facility (the "Revolving Credit Facility"), which is also available for letters
of credit. At December 26, 1996, the Company had no outstanding working capital
borrowings; however, letters of credit outstanding were $20.8 million. Principal
installments of the term loan are payable quarterly as follows: $4 million per
quarter for four consecutive quarters beginning February 28, 1997; $5 million
for four consecutive quarters beginning February 28, 1998; $6 million on
February 28, 1999; and $7 million for two consecutive quarters beginning May 31,
1999. The Revolving Credit Facility expires, and all amounts outstanding under
the facility must be repaid, on August 31, 1999. All borrowings under the Credit
Agreement accrue interest at a variable rate based on a base rate or an adjusted
Eurodollar rate (8.125% at December 26, 1996) and are secured by the issued and
outstanding stock, as well as substantially all the assets, of FRD and its
subsidiary.
The Credit Agreement and indentures under which the Senior Notes have been
issued contain a number of restrictive covenants which, among other things,
limit (subject to certain exceptions) FRD and its subsidiaries with respect to
incurrence of debt, existence of liens, investments and joint ventures, the
declaration or payment of dividends, the making of guarantees and other
contingent obligations, mergers, the sale of assets, capital expenditures and
material changes in their business. In addition, the Credit Agreement contains
certain financial covenants including provisions for the maintenance of a
minimum level of interest coverage (as defined), limitations on ratios of
indebtedness (as defined) to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), maintenance of a minimum level of EBITDA and limitations
on annual capital expenditures.
The Company was in compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement at
December 26, 1996. Under the most restrictive provision of the Credit Agreement
(ratio of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA to interest expense), at December 26,
1996, the Company's consolidated EBITDA for the six months ended December 26,
1996 could be $5.6 million less and the Company would still be in compliance.
In January 1994, FRI-M Corporation entered into a Credit Facility Agreement
(the "Credit Facility") with $150 million in senior secured revolving credit
facilities with a $100 million sub-limit for standby letters of credit which was
used for general purposes including working capital, debt service and capital
expenditure requirements. The Credit Facility contained various covenants
including the maintenance of certain financial ratios. At December 31, 1995, FRI
and certain of its subsidiaries were suffering from deficit cash flows from
operations and made required debt service payments on other obligations through
borrowings on the Credit Facility. Accordingly, FRI failed to comply with
certain of such financial covenants. However, the banks under the Credit
Facility (the Banks) agreed to waive such noncompliance,
F-12
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 6: DEBT -- Continued
through July 31, 1996. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and since the waivers only extended to July 31, 1996, the Company
classified the outstanding balance of $79.8 million at December 31, 1995 as a
current liability. Further, the amortization of the related debt issuance costs
was accelerated assuming the debt would be retired or replaced earlier. In
connection with the sale of FRI-M (see note "Organization and Basis of
Presentation"), the Credit Facility was paid off and is not available for
additional borrowings by the Company.
Aggregate annual maturities during the next five years and thereafter of
long-term debt are as follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1997.......................................................................... $ 19,578
1998.......................................................................... 23,628
1999.......................................................................... 23,686
2000.......................................................................... 3,404
2001.......................................................................... 3,146
Thereafter.................................................................... 164,633
$238,075
</TABLE>
The estimated fair value of the Company's long-term debt approximates its
carrying value.
NOTE 7: OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
A summary of other accrued liabilities follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995
<S> <C> <C>
Sales tax........................................................... $ 3,967 $ 4,452
Property taxes...................................................... 1,471 1,354
Accrued rent........................................................ 2,957 2,707
Utilities........................................................... 2,800 1,300
Other............................................................... 9,694 3,293
$20,889 $13,106
</TABLE>
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES
A summary of the provision for income taxes for the seven months ended
December 26, 1996 is as follows ($ in thousands):
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Current:
Federal.................................................................... $199
State, Foreign and Other................................................... 261
460
Deferred:
Federal.................................................................... --
State, Foreign and Other................................................... --
Provision for income taxes........................................................ $460
</TABLE>
The pro forma provision for income taxes in the combined financial
statements for the five months ended May 23, 1996, the year ended December 31,
1995, the eleven months ended December 25, 1994, and the one month ended January
26, 1994 are equal to 40% of income before taxes, excluding the amortization of
certain intangible assets.
F-13
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES -- Continued
Subsequent to May 23, 1996, the Company will join with FCI in the filing of
consolidated federal and certain consolidated state income tax returns. The
Company is a party to a tax-sharing agreement with FCI that provides for the
Company to pay to FCI the amount of the current income tax liability the Company
would have had if the Company were filing separate federal and state income tax
returns.
The following represents the approximate tax effect of each significant
type of temporary difference and carryforward giving rise to deferred income tax
assets or liabilities as of December 26, 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ in thousands)
<S> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Self-insurance reserves............................................................................................ $6,679
Amortization of intangible assets.................................................................................. 5,636
Capitalized leases................................................................................................. 1,445
Other accruals and reserves........................................................................................ 4,368
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards....................................................................... 100
Less: valuation allowance............................................................................................ (8,665)
Total deferred tax assets............................................................................................ 9,563
Less deferred tax liabilities -- Depreciation of fixed assets........................................................ (9,563)
Total deferred income tax liability.................................................................................. $ 0
</TABLE>
The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the portion of the
deferred tax asset for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will
not be realized.
The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and the
effective tax rate for the seven months ended December 26, 1996 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Statutory rate.......................................................................................................... 35%
Differences:
State, foreign, and other taxes, net of federal income tax benefit.................................................... (3)%
Amortization of goodwill.............................................................................................. (21)%
Temporary differences not benefited as a result of the establishment of a valuation allowance........................... (19)%
Effective tax rate...................................................................................................... (8)%
</TABLE>
At December 26, 1996, the Company has available, for purposes of its tax
sharing agreement with FCI, alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits of
approximately $100,000. Such AMT credits may be carried forward indefinitely.
NOTE 9: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
In connection with the acquisition, certain employees of the Company became
eligible to participate in incentive compensation plans sponsored by Flagstar
which provide for awards to management employees based on meeting or exceeding
certain performance targets as defined by such plans. Total expense for these
plans included in the statement of consolidated operations was $2.6 million for
the seven months ended December 26, 1996.
FRI maintained several incentive compensation and related plans for
executives and key operating personnel, including restaurant and field
management of its subsidiaries, including FRD Predecessor. Total expenses for
these plans included in the statements of combined operations were $2.5 million
for the five months ended May 23, 1996, $2.2 million for the year ended December
31, 1995, $4.7 million for the eleven months ended December 25, 1994, and $0.4
million for the one month ended January 26, 1994.
FRD Predecessor participated in savings and investment plans sponsored by
FRI. Substantially all of FRD Predecessor's salaried employees were eligible to
participate in the plans. Total expenses under such plans included in the
statements of combined operations were $12,400 for the five months ended May 23,
1996, $159,000 for the year ended
F-14
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 9: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS -- Continued
December 31, 1995, $17,000 for the eleven months ended December 25, 1994 and $0
for the one month ended January 26, 1994.
Effective with the acquisition, FRI-M employees may no longer participate
in FRI benefit plans.
During 1996, certain employees of FRD were granted stock options under
FCI's 1989 Stock Option Plan which is described below. FCI and FRD have adopted
the disclosure-only provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation" (SFAS 123) while continuing to
follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees" ("APB 25") and related Interpretations in accounting for their
stock-based compensation plans. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the
Company's employee stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
FCI's 1989 Stock Option Plan (the "1989 Plan") permits a Committee of the
Board of Directors to grant options to key employees of FCI and its subsidiaries
to purchase shares of common stock of FCI at a stated price established by the
Committee. Such options are exercisable at such time or times either in whole or
part, as determined by the Committee. The 1989 Plan authorizes grants of up to
6.5 million common shares. The exercise price of each option equals or exceeds
the market price of FCI's stock on the date of grant. Options granted to officer
level employees vest at a rate of 20% per annum beginning on the first
anniversary date of the grant. Options granted to non-officer level employees
prior to August 13, 1996 vest at a rate of 25% per annum. Those granted on
August 13, 1996 or subsequent thereto, vest at a rate of 20% per annum. If not
exercised, all options expire ten years from the date of grant.
On December 13, 1996, the outstanding $6.00 options of certain officers and
senior staff, representing approximately 307,400 outstanding options, were
repriced to $1.25 per share, the closing price of the common stock on December
12, 1996. The repricing did not impact the option vesting schedules.
Pro forma information regarding net income is required by SFAS 123, and has
been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options
under the fair value method of that statement. FRD is a wholly owned subsidiary
of Flagstar and accordingly, per share date is not meaningful and has not been
provided. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for the grants in 1996: divided yield of 0.0%; expected
volatility of .438; risk-free interest rate of 5.7%; and a weighted average
expected life of the options of 8.9 years.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. Such pro forma
disclosures are not presented because the impact on the Company's net income for
the seven months ended December 26, 1996 would have been immaterial if the
options granted during that period had been accounted for in accordance with
SFAS 123.
F-15
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 9: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS -- Continued
A summary of the FCI 1989 Option Plan as it relates to options granted to
FRD employees as of December 26, 1996 and changes during the seven months ended
December 26, 1996 is presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Weighted-Average
(in thousands) Excercise Price
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding at May 24, 1996 60,000 $ 6.00
Granted:
Exercise price equals market price.................................................... 35,400 2.75
Exercise price exceeds market price................................................... 557,800 3.38
Exercised..................................................................................
Forfeited/Expired.......................................................................... (334,800) 5.66
Outstanding at December 26, 1996........................................................... 318,400 $ 1.41
Options exercisable at year-end............................................................ 12,000 $ 1.25
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year:
Exercise price equals market price.................................................... $ 1.76
Exercise price exceeds market price................................................... $ 1.06
</TABLE>
Options outstanding at May 24, 1996 represent options granted to former
Flagstar employees who are now FRD employees.
NOTE 10: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is involved in various litigation matters incidental to their
business. The Company does not believe that any of the claims or actions filed
against it will have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated financial
position and results of operations of the Company.
On February 22, 1996, Flagstar entered into an agreement with Integrated
Systems Solutions Corporation ("ISSC"). The ten year agreement provides for ISSC
to manage and operate Flagstar's information systems, as well as develop and
implement new systems and applications to enhance information technology. Under
the agreement, ISSC has full oversight responsibility for the data center
operations, applications development and maintenance, voice and data networking,
help desk operations and point-of-sale technology. In connection with the
acquisition of FRI-M, an addendum to the ISSC contract, effective January 2,
1997, was signed for the general purpose of incorporating FRD into the original
agreement. In accordance with the addendum, the Company is required to pay ISSC
approximately $14 million over ten years.
NOTE 11: SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
A summary of shareholder's equity for the seven months ended December 26,
1996 follows (in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Total
Total Shareholder's
Other Equity Deficit Equity(Deficit)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance May 24, 1996............................................................... -- -- --
Activity
Capital Contribution............................................................. $ 75,000 -- $ 75,000
Net loss......................................................................... -- $(6,189) (6,189)
Balance December 26, 1996.......................................................... $ 75,000 $(6,189) $ 68,811
</TABLE>
See Note 12: Related Party Transactions, for a summary of the combined
equity activity for the five months ended May 23, 1996, the year ended December
31, 1995, and the eleven months ended December 25, 1994.
F-16
<PAGE>
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
NOTE 12: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Pursuant to a management services agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of
May 24, 1996, between Flagstar and the Company, Flagstar has agreed to provide
certain management and support services to the Company. The fee for services
performed under the Agreement is equal to 1% of the Company's net revenues. As
required under the Senior Note indenture and the Credit Agreement, actual
payment of the fee to Flagstar cannot occur unless certain financial targets are
met. Total fees charged to the statement of consolidated operations for the
seven months ended December 26, 1996 totaled approximately $3.0 million and have
been included in other accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet because the Company has not met the required financial targets.
FRI provided certain financial, administrative, legal and staff functions
and services to FRI-M which were allocated based on the number of open and
operating units. Management considered this method to be reasonable. The
management fee for these services was $1.6 million for the five months ended May
23, 1996, $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 1995 and the eleven
months ended December 25, 1994 and $.3 million for the one month ended January
26, 1994.
Interest expense associated with the FRI-M Credit Facility was allocated to
the FRI subsidiaries, including FRI-M, during the five months ended May 23,
1996, the year ended December 31, 1995 and the eleven months ended December 25,
1994 based on current liabilities outstanding.
Prior to the acquisition, FRI-M deposited cash in excess of its operating
requirements with FRI, and FRI advanced funds to FRI-M to finance expansion of
its restaurant business. These deposits and advances were made on an interest-
free basis.
Prior to the acquisition, FRI-M was charged premiums by FRI for certain
insurance coverage provided under FRI insurance plans (employee group medical
and life, workers compensation, general liability and property insurance).
During the five months ended May 23, 1996, the year ended December 31, 1995, the
eleven months ended December 25, 1994 and the one month ended January 26, 1994
such premium charges amounted to $7.1 million, $12.7 million, $14.4 million and
$1.3 million.
A summary of the combined equity activity, for the five months ended May
23, 1996, the year ended December 31, 1995, and the eleven months ended December
25, 1994 follows. FRI Predecessor information is not presented as it is not
considered relevant ($ in thousands).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Five Months Eleven Months
Ended Year Ended Ended
May 23, December 31, December 25,
1996 1995 1994
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net combined equity, beginning of period....................................... $ 152,601 $192,354 $ 242,275
Allocation of management expenses.............................................. 1,630 2,634 2,626
Pro forma income tax provision................................................. 2,160 6,670 9,496
(Borrowings) repayments on revolving credit facility........................... 79,815 (15,786) (56,184)
Self-insurance premium charges................................................. 7,089 12,730 14,358
Change in intercompany......................................................... (37,745) (50,725) (29,611)
Net income..................................................................... 1,101 4,724 9,394
Net combined equity, end of period............................................. $ 206,651 $152,601 $ 192,354
</TABLE>
F-17
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
($ in Thousands) December 26, 1996
<S> <C>
Assets
Deferred financing costs-net of $81 of accumulated amortization.......................................... $ 1,088
Investment in subsidiary................................................................................. 287,362
Total assets............................................................................................. $ 288,450
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities:
Accrued interest....................................................................................... $ 8,692
8,692
Long-term liabilities:
Payable to subsidiary.................................................................................. 54,050
Notes payable (Note 2)................................................................................. 156,897
Total long-term liabilities.............................................................................. 208,066
Equity
Paid-in capital.......................................................................................... 75,000
Deficit.................................................................................................. (6,189)
Total Stockholder's Equity............................................................................... 68,811
$ 288,450
</TABLE>
S-1
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Seven Months
Ended
($ in Thousands) December 26, 1996
<S> <C>
Operating Income......................................................................................... $ --
Other income (expense):
Equity in net income of subsidiary..................................................................... 5,465
Interest expense....................................................................................... (11,654)
Total other income (expense)...................................................................... (6,189)
Net loss................................................................................................. $ (6,189)
</TABLE>
S-2
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE I
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Seven Months
Ended
($ in Thousands) December 26, 1996
<S> <C>
Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities:
Net Loss............................................................................................... $ (6,189)
Amortization of deferred financing costs............................................................... 81
Equity in net income from Subsidiary................................................................... (5,465)
Increase in accrued interest payable................................................................... 8,692
Net cash used in operating activities.................................................................... (2,881)
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities:
Acquisition of Subsidiary.............................................................................. (125,000)
Net cash flows used in investing activities.............................................................. (125,000)
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities:
Increase in payable to Subsidiary...................................................................... 54,050
Deferred financing costs............................................................................... (1,169)
Capital contribution from Flagstar..................................................................... 75,000
Net cash flows provided by financing activities.......................................................... 127,881
Net Change in Cash....................................................................................... 0
Cash at Beginning and End of Period...................................................................... $ --
Cash Paid for Interest................................................................................... $ 2,881
</TABLE>
Notes to Condensed Financial Information
Note 1: The condensed financial information included in this schedule reflects
FRD Acquisition Co.'s investment in FRI-M, its wholly-owned subsidiary, on the
equity method. FRD Acquisition Co. was formed to acquire the stock of FRI-M.
Such acquisition occurred May 23, 1996 and was effected when FRD paid cash of
$125,000,000 and issued notes payable of $150,000,000 (subsequently increased by
$6,896,902).
Note 2: The 12.5% Senior Notes are due July 2004. Interest is payable
semi-annually.
S-3
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
By: /s/ C. ROBERT CAMPBELL
C. Robert Campbell
(Executive Vice President)
Date: February 25, 1997
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ MARK L. SHIPMAN Director and President February 25, 1997
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Mark L. Shipman)
/s/ ANN A. WRIDE Vice President, Finance and February 25, 1997
Chief Financial Officer
(Ann A. Wride) (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ JAMES B. ADAMSON Director February 25, 1997
(James B. Adamson)
/s/ ELLEN DOWNEY Director February 25, 1997
(Ellen Downey)
/s/ PAUL E. RAETHER Director February 25, 1997
(Paul E. Raether)
/s/ H. JAY SARLES Director February 25, 1997
(H. Jay Sarles)
/s/ MICHAEL T. TOKARZ Director February 25, 1997
(Michael T. Tokarz)
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
CONSENT OF SOLE SHAREHOLDER
OF
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
The undersigned, being the sole shareholder of FRD Acquisition
Co., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby consent, in lieu of
a meeting of the Corporation's stockholders, to the actions hereinafter set
forth, taken or to be taken by the Corporation, and does hereby direct the
Secretary to file this Consent with the minutes of the Corporation.
1. Amendments to Bylaws:
RESOLVED, that Article III, Section 1(a) of the
Bylaws of the Corporation shall be, and it hereby is, amended
in its entirety, so that, as amended, said Article III,
Section 1(a) shall be and read as follows:
Section 1 - Number, Election and Term of Office:
(a) The number of the directors of the Corporation
shall not be less than one and no more than seven, within the
limits above specified, the number of directors shall be
determined from time to time by the stockholders or the Board
of Directors at any meeting thereof. The number of directors
shall not be less than three, unless all of the outstanding
shares are owned beneficially and of record by less than three
shareholders, in which event the number of directors shall not
be less than the number of shareholders permitted by statute.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that Article III, Section 8 of the
Bylaws of the Corporation shall be, and it hereby is, amended
in its entirety, so that, as amended, said Article III,
Section 8 shall be and read as follows:
Section 8 - Vacancies:
Any vacancy in the Board of Directors occurring by
reason of an increase in the number of directors, or by reason
of the death, resignation, disqualification, removal (unless a
vacancy created by the removal of a director by the
shareholders shall be filled by the shareholders at the
meeting at which the removal was effected) or inability to act
of any director, or otherwise, shall be filled for the
unexpired portion of the term by a majority vote of the
remaining directors, though less than a quorum, at any regular
meeting or special meeting of the Board of Directors called
for that purpose or by the shareholders at any meeting
thereof.
FLAGSTAR CORPORATION,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION
Dated: May 24, 1996 By:_________________________________
Rhonda J. Parish
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
<PAGE>
Exhibit 12
FRD ACQUISITION CO.
COMPUTATIONS OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRD FRD FRI
Successor Predecessor Predecessor
Seven Five
Months Months
Ended Ended Fiscal Year Ended
Dec. 26, May 23, December (a),
1996 1996 <C> <C> <C> <C>
<S> <C> <C> 1995 1994 1993 1992
($ in thousands)
Earnings (loss) before
income taxes......................................... $(5,729) $ 3,261 $11,394 $20,139 $25,928 $18,634
Add:
Interest expense (b)(c).............................. 17,680 4,658 16,515 6,934 4,594 4,852
Earnings available for fixed charges................... $11,951 $ 7,919 $27,909 $27,073 $30,522 $23,486
Fixed charges:
Interest expense (b)(c).............................. $17,680 $ 4,658 $16,515 $ 6,934 $ 4,594 $ 4,852
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..................... 0.68x 1.70x 1.69x 3.90x 6.64x 4.84x
</TABLE>
(a) The Company's five most recently completed fiscal years ended on December
26, 1996, December 31, 1995, December 25, 1994, December 26, 1993 and
December 28, 1992.
(b) Capitalized interest is not considered material to the Company's overall
financial position.
(c) Interest expense includes the interest portion of rentals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1995 DEC-26-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1995 DEC-26-1996
<CASH> 5,497 14,300
<SECURITIES> 0 0
<RECEIVABLES> 5,439 5,988
<ALLOWANCES> 0 0
<INVENTORY> 5,288 5,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 31,712 34,860
<PP&E> 180,437 149,587
<DEPRECIATION> (34,395) (14,611)
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 332,847 388,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 142,691 90,596
<BONDS> 27,502 218,497
0 0
0 0
<COMMON> 0 0
<OTHER-SE> 152,601 68,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 332,847 388,046
<SALES> 505,619 490,987
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 505,619 490,987
<CGS> 0 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 473,594 476,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 4,116 (5,441)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 16,515 22,338
<INCOME-PRETAX> 11,394 (2,468)
<INCOME-TAX> 6,670 2,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 4,724 (5,088)
<DISCONTINUED> 0 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0 0
<CHANGES> 0 0
<NET-INCOME> 4,724 (5,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY> 0 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0 0
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99
SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides a
"safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide
prospective information about their companies, so long as those statements are
identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in the statement. The Company desires to
take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Act. Certain information,
particularly information regarding future economic performance, finances and
plans and objectives of management, contained, or incorporated by reference, in
the Company's 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K is forward-looking. In some cases
information regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from any such forward-looking statement appear together
with such statement. Also, the following factors, in addition to other possible
factors not listed, could affect the Company's actual results and cause such
results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements:
COMPETITION. The Company's future performance will be subject to a number
of factors that affect the restaurant industry generally, including competition.
The restaurant business is highly competitive and the competition can be
expected to increase. Price, restaurant location, food quality, quality and
speed of service and attractiveness of facilities are important aspects of
competition as are the effectiveness of marketing and advertising programs. The
competitive environment is also often affected by factors beyond the Company's
or a particular restaurant's control. The Company's restaurants compete with a
wide variety of restaurants ranging from national and regional restaurant chains
(some of which have substantially greater financial resources than the Company)
to locally-owned restaurants. There is also active competition for advantageous
commercial real estate sites suitable for restaurants.
ECONOMIC, MARKET AND OTHER CONDITIONS. Food service businesses are often
affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local economic
conditions and demographic trends. The performance of individual restaurants may
be adversely affected by factors such as traffic patterns, demographic
considerations and the type, number and location of competing restaurants.
Multi-unit food service chains such as the Company's can also be materially and
adversely affected by publicity resulting from food quality, illness, injury or
other health concerns or operating issues stemming from one restaurant or a
limited number of restaurants. Dependence on frequent deliveries of fresh
produce and groceries subjects food service businesses to the risk that
shortages or interruptions in supply, caused by adverse weather or other
conditions could adversely affect the availability, quality and cost of
ingredients. In addition, unfavorable trends or developments concerning factors
such as inflation, increased food, labor and employee benefit costs (including
increases in hourly wage and minimum unemployment tax rates), regional weather
conditions and the availability of experienced management and hourly employees
may also adversely affect the food service industry in general and the Company's
results of operations and financial condition in particular.
IMPORTANCE OF LOCATIONS. The success of Company and franchised restaurants
is significantly influenced by location. There can be no assurance that current
locations will continue to be attractive, as demographic patterns change. It is
possible the neighborhood or economic conditions where restaurants are located
could decline in the future, resulting in potentially reduced sales in those
locations.
GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS. The Company and its franchisees are subject to
federal, state and local laws and regulations governing health, sanitation,
environmental matters, safety, the sale of alcoholic beverages and hiring and
employment practices. Restaurant operations are also subject to federal and
state laws that prohibit discrimination and laws regulating the design and
operation of facilities, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990.
The operation of the Company's franchisee system is also subject to regulations
enacted by a number of states and rules promulgated by the Federal Trade
Commission. The Company cannot predict the effect on its operations,
particularly on its relationship with franchisees, caused by the future
enactment of additional legislation regulating the franchise relationship.
