<PAGE>
================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-12229
DEPUY, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
DELAWARE 35-1989795
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
700 ORTHOPAEDIC DRIVE, WARSAW, INDIANA 46580
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (219) 267-8143
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- -----------------------------------------
Common Stock, par value $.0l New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check [x] whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No _____
---
Indicate by check [x] if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [x]
---------
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of March 16, 1998 was $420,462,572. Registrant's closing price
as reported on the New York Stock Exchange--Composite Transactions for March 16,
1998 was $26.75 per share.
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $.0l per share, outstanding
as of March 16, 1998 was 98,778,226.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 30, 1998 are incorporated by reference in Part
III of this Report.
================================================================================
<PAGE>
GENERAL
This Report includes forward-looking statements concerning the Registrant's
operations, economic performance and financial condition. Such forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on
various factors. Actual results could differ materially from those currently
anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-
looking statements, which only speak as of the date of this Report.
Certain of the information contained in "Item 1. Business" concerning the
definition, size and development of the various product markets in which the
Registrant participates and the Registrant's general expectations concerning the
development of such product markets, both domestically and internationally, are
based on estimates prepared by the Registrant using data from various sources
(primarily Medical Data International, Medifacts International, MDIS
Publications, IMS America and Market Line International, as well as data from
the Registrant's internal research), which data the Registrant has no reason to
believe are unreliable, and on assumptions made by the Registrant, based on such
data and its knowledge of the orthopaedic industry, which the Registrant
believes to be reasonable. While the Registrant is not aware of any
misstatements in such information, the Registrant's estimates, in particular as
they relate to the Registrant's general expectations concerning the product
markets in which the Registrant participates, involve risks and uncertainties
and are subject to change based on various factors. Market share figures
contained in the narrative portions of Item 1. "Business" includes sales of the
Registrant's 50% owned subsidiary, DePuy DuPont Orthopaedics.
_________________________
DePuy(R), ACE(TM), OrthoTech(TM), LCS(R), AMK(R), Charnley(R),
Endurance(R), Solution System(R), Duraloc(R), Elite(TM), Coordinate(TM),
Global(TM), STERILE VIEW(R), POROCOAT(R), CMW(R), AML(R), Peak(TM), NeuFlex(TM),
Prodigy(R), and Cida(TM) are trademarks of the Company, its subsidiaries or
affiliates. Hylamer(R) and Marathon(TM) are trademarks of DePuy DuPont
Orthopaedics(TM). Kevlar(R) is a registered trademark of E.I. DuPont de Nemours
and Company. MOSS(R) is a registered trademark of Biedermann Motech GmbH, the
Company's joint venture partner in DePuy Motech(TM).
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
INTRODUCTION
DePuy, Inc. ("DePuy" or the "Company") is one of the world's leading
designers, manufacturers and distributors of orthopaedic devices and supplies.
The Company's products are used primarily by orthopaedic medical specialists and
spinal neurosurgeons in both surgical and nonsurgical therapy to treat patients
with musculoskeletal conditions resulting from degenerative diseases,
deformities, trauma and sports-related injuries. The Company's products cover a
broad range of orthopaedic needs and include hip and knee implants for primary
and revision joint replacement; shoulder implants to reconstruct damaged joints;
spinal implants to facilitate fusion of elements of the spine and to correct
deformities; trauma products to reconstruct small and large bone fractures; and
implants, knee braces and other soft good supplies for the rehabilitation of
sports-related injuries. Additionally, the Company markets complementary
products for the operating room.
1
<PAGE>
Founded in 1895 by Revra DePuy, DePuy is the world's oldest manufacturer of
orthopaedic devices. In October 1996, the Company became a public company
through an Initial Public Offering of its Common Stock (the "Initial Public
Offering" or the "IPO"). Prior to the Initial Public Offering, the worldwide
operations of DePuy were consolidated under Corange U.S. Holdings, Inc., an
Indiana corporation ("CUSHI"), and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
Corange Limited, a Bermuda company and the ultimate parent of the DePuy group
("Corange"). As part of such reorganization, Boehringer Mannheim Corporation
("BMC"), the U.S. operating subsidiary of the Boehringer Mannheim companies
(which were under common control with the DePuy subsidiaries) was transferred
outside the CUSHI consolidated group. Following such reorganization, for
purposes of reincorporating CUSHI in Delaware, CUSHI was merged downstream into
the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity in such merger. The
Company had been organized in Delaware on July 26, 1996 as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of CUSHI for purposes of becoming the holding company for the DePuy
group after the Initial Public Offering. On March 5, 1998 Roche Healthcare
Limited, a Bermuda corporation and a subsidiary of Hoffman-LaRoche ("Roche"),
acquired Corange to become the indirect owner of approximately 84% of DePuy's
common stock held by Corange and its subsidiaries. Roche is a multinational
company and world leader in research-based healthcare with principal businesses
in pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, vitamins and fine chemicals, and fragrances and
flavors. Although the Company cannot predict the effect this acquisition may
have on its future performance, it believes it will be permitted to continue its
growth and success under the guidance of another world leader in healthcare.
The Company's principal executive offices are located at 700 Orthopaedic
Drive, Warsaw, Indiana 46580 and its telephone number is (219) 267-8143.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The Company believes the orthopaedic product market had approximately $8.9
billion in 1997 sales worldwide, with U.S. sales constituting approximately $4.9
billion of that total. The Company estimates that reconstructive products
accounted for approximately $3.7 billion of the 1997 worldwide orthopaedic
market, with the U.S. and international markets split equally with approximately
$1.85 billion each. The Company believes that it is one of the leading
manufacturers of reconstructive products worldwide, having a worldwide market
share of approximately 15% in 1997, and the second leading manufacturer in the
U.S. With respect to hip products, the Company believes that it is the leading
manufacturer worldwide and one of the two leaders in the U.S. Within the knee
market, the Company believes it is the third leading manufacturer worldwide and
in the U.S. The Company believes that it is currently one of the leading
manufacturers within the worldwide spinal market, and that its market share
would significantly increase upon the finalization of the purchase of AcroMed
Corporation ("AcroMed") as described in Item 7 - Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The spinal market is
one of the fastest-growing segments in musculoskeletal surgery.
DePuy has established a leading market position through the continued
introduction of high quality, clinically-proven products in major segments of
the orthopaedic industry. Geographically, the Company commenced the development
of international distribution channels in 1988 and now has Company-owned
distribution subsidiaries in all major markets outside the U.S. International
sales have increased to 49% of total sales in 1997, up from 11% in 1988. The
Company's acquisitions and alliances have also focused on the entry into the
high growth markets of spinal implants, trauma and sports medicine. In 1993,
the Company entered the expanding market of spinal implants through a joint
venture with Biedermann Motech GmbH of Germany. In 1994, the Company expanded
its position in the trauma device market through the acquisition of ACE Medical
Company, now called DePuy ACE Medical
2
<PAGE>
Company ("DePuy ACE"), a leading manufacturer of titanium alloy trauma products
and externally applied fixation devices for the treatment of fractures. Also in
1994, DePuy International Ltd. ("DePuy International", formerly Charles F.
Thackray Limited, acquired by the Company in 1990) acquired CMW Laboratories
("CMW"), the oldest orthopaedic bone cement manufacturer in the world. In March
1996, the Company expanded its position in the fast-growing sports medicine
device market through its acquisition of Orthopedic Technology, Inc., now called
DePuy Orthopaedic Technology, Inc. ("DePuy OrthoTech"), a manufacturer and
distributor of external braces used in the prevention and rehabilitation of
sports-induced injuries. In order to focus on its core competencies in
orthopaedics, the Company entered into agreements in March and May 1997 to sell
the pharmaceutical and healthcare businesses of its subsidiary in the United
Kingdom, DePuy International. In April 1997, the Company acquired Landanger-
Camus ("Landanger"), headquartered in Chaumont, France, the leading French
manufacturer of hip implants and one of the leading French distributors of
orthopaedic devices and supplies. This acquisition is disclosed in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein. DePuy believes that many of
its target markets remain fragmented, providing opportunities for continued
consolidation. Technologically, DePuy seeks to remain on the leading edge of
innovation and has established programs in the area of bone and tissue
regeneration and biomaterials.
In the United States, DePuy has been at the forefront of pursuing
opportunities in a managed care environment. As the pressures on cost
containment continue to increase within the healthcare industry, DePuy has
actively pursued contracts with national and regional hospital buying groups, as
well as individual healthcare facilities, where the Company believes that the
increase in unit volume produced by high levels of product sales to such groups,
and the opportunity for increased market share, continue to offset the financial
impact of discounting products. The Company has also created and introduced
software packages to help surgeons and healthcare facilities document and
collect reliable data on costs, clinical results, outcomes and patient
satisfaction. By demonstrating the superiority of its products, through careful
tracking, evaluation and promotion of clinical outcomes, the Company believes
that it is well positioned for its customers to receive patient referrals from
third-party payers and integrated healthcare delivery networks.
PRODUCTS
The Company's core products are, and have traditionally been,
reconstructive implant devices for hips and knees. Having established itself as
a market leader in the United States in hip and knee replacements, the Company
began, in the late 1980s, to expand its product line to cover the full range
3
<PAGE>
of orthopaedic products through strategic acquisitions and alliances. The
following chart traces the expansion of the Company's product lines during the
last five years. In the table below, reconstructive products include implants
for hips, knees and extremities.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Net of Net of Net of Net of Net of
Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Reconstructive
products........... $531.7 69% $470.2 67% $450.6 71% $405.9 74% $363.2 78%
Spinal implants..... 61.8 8 45.5 7 30.6 5 12.5 2 3.2 1
Trauma products..... 61.7 8 56.4 8 49.4 8 38.5 7 8.5 2
Sports medicine(1).. 50.3 7 48.2 7 29.4 4 27.7 5 -- --
Other products...... 64.7 8 77.0 11 76.6 12 67.2 12 91.8 19
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Total sales... $770.2 100% $697.3 100% $636.6 100% $551.8 100% $466.7 100%
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
_________________
(1) Prior to 1994, sales of sports medicine products were included in other
products.
Recognizing that much of the future growth in its core implant business
would come from international markets, the Company began focusing in the late
1980s on increasing its sales outside the United States by developing
distribution channels in countries outside the U.S. See "Business--Marketing and
Sales." From 1991 to 1997, non-U.S. revenue increased from 33% to 49% of total
revenues. The following table sets forth the geographic sources of the
Company's revenues for the past five years based on customer location.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
--------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
Net of Net of Net of Net of Net of
Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
United States........ $394.6 51% $373.8 54% $349.9 55% $333.3 61% $296.7 64%
Europe............... 229.3 30 186.0 27 172.2 27 132.8 24 112.6 24
Asia/Pacific......... 120.2 16 107.0 15 90.6 14 68.3 12 42.9 9
Other................ 26.1 3 30.5 4 23.9 4 17.4 3 14.5 3
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Total sales.... $770.2 100% $697.3 100% $636.6 100% $551.8 100% $466.7 100%
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== =======
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE>
The Company's backlog of firm orders is not material.
Reconstructive Products
Until the early 1960s, the orthopaedic industry was primarily involved with
the manufacture and sale of products intended for treatment of injuries, most
often traumatic injuries. As a result of developments which began in the late
1950s and the early 1960s, products and procedures were developed for the
treatment of joint disease, such as arthritis, as well. Total joint replacement
surgery replaces worn joints with components made of stainless steel, titanium
alloy or cobalt chromium alloy, depending on the design, and ultra-high
molecular weight polyethylene ("UHMWPE"), a medical grade plastic. The first
widely-used products were various forms of hip replacements, some of which,
especially in the early years, involved the replacement of the femoral side
only. As the years progressed, total joint replacement became the standard
procedure. Development of total knee systems followed the development of total
hip replacements.
The worldwide market for reconstructive implant devices in 1997 was
approximately $3.7 billion in sales. Of these sales, approximately 50% were in
the U.S. and 50% were in the rest of the world. The Company's worldwide sales
of reconstructive products in 1997 was approximately $532 million.
Reconstructive products may be further broken down by category into
cemented products, cementless products and revision products. Cemented products
are secured to the bone with a grout made of polymethylmethacrylate ("cement" or
"bone cement"). Cementless products are "biologically fixed," which means the
surrounding tissue grows into the implant's porous, beaded coating, or macro
texture features, securing it without the use of cement. A revision product,
which may be either cemented or cementless, is the implant used when revision
surgery is performed after a primary implant wears out or becomes loose after
years of use.
The Company designs, manufactures and markets a full line of joint
reconstructive implants for the hip, knee, shoulder, elbow, wrist and ankle.
Hip Systems. The Company believes the market for hip implant products in
1997 was approximately $1.9 billion in sales worldwide and approximately $800
million in sales in the U.S. The Company believes it is the leading manufacturer
of hip implant products worldwide and is one of the two leaders in the United
States.
In hip arthroplasty, the "ball and socket" of the hip joint are replaced
with several components, depending on the product design. The stem, made of
stainless steel, titanium alloy or cobalt chromium alloy, supports the head,
which articulates with the acetabular component. The acetabular component,
which usually consists of a polyethylene liner and metal cup or an all
polyethylene cup, replaces the socket. DePuy offers a full line of hip implants
to meet patient needs and surgeon preferences. Its two leading total hip
systems are the Charnley Hip and the AML Hip. The Charnley Hip is one of the
leading cemented hip implants in the world by unit volume. The AML Hip and the
Solution System are, the leading porous-coated hip system and the leading
revision hip system, respectively, in the U.S.
AML Total Hip System. The AML Hip is a cementless system that uses a
proprietary porous implant coating ("POROCOAT") to secure the implant in
place through biological fixation. Considered the Company's flagship
product, the AML hip stem was the first implant to obtain Premarket
Approval ("PMA") from the Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") for
5
<PAGE>
use without cement and has the longest clinical history of any cementless
hip implant on the market today, with a survivorship estimated to be 99% at
10 years. The extensively porous-coated AML and Prodigy Hip System is the
most widely used cementless system in the U.S.
Charnley Hip System. The Charnley Hip is a stainless steel alloy
cemented hip implant with extensive clinical history. It was the world's
first total hip implant and has the longest clinical history of any implant
on the market. The Charnley femoral hip stem has a survivorship estimate of
95% at 20 years. The Charnley Hip is one of the leading cemented hip
implants in the world by unit volume. The new generation of the Charnley
family, the Elite Plus Total Hip, was introduced in 1995, and can utilize a
Zirconia femoral bearing surface designed to further reduce wear of the
surface and prolong the life of the arthroplasty. In the U.S., the
Endurance System expands upon the principles of the Charnley Hip.
Manufactured from a cobalt chromium alloy, the Endurance System was
introduced in 1994.
Solution System. Revision hip surgery is performed when infection
occurs or the supporting bone or primary implant wears out from years of
use. Introduced in 1990, the Solution System was the first extensively
porous-coated revision system on the market. The POROCOAT coating helps
provide the additional stability required in revision hip surgery. The
Solution System, with its extensive successful clinical history and product
offering, has a substantial share of the revision market in the U.S. DePuy
also markets a cemented revision implant as part of the Endurance System.
Duraloc Acetabular Cup System. The Duraloc Acetabular Cup System
features a sensor-ring locking mechanism, uniform dome loading, optimal
polyethylene thickness and offers a wide assortment of options to address
specific patient needs. This combination permits mobility without
sacrificing structural support. The patented Duraloc Acetabular Cup System
is a leading cup system in the U.S.
Knee Systems. The Company believes the worldwide and U.S. markets in 1997
for knee implants were $1.7 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, in sales.
The Company believes it is the third largest manufacturer in the knee market in
the U.S. and worldwide.
Total knee arthroplasty consists of several components depending on the
product design: the femoral component, the tibial component and the patellar
component. The Company offers a full range of implants, including the LCS Knee,
the AMK Knee and the Coordinate Revision Knee System.
LCS Total Knee System. The LCS Total Knee System is a mobile-bearing
knee system. The mobile bearings incorporated into the design allow the
implant to more closely simulate the anatomic movement of a natural knee
while minimizing stresses on the implant components. The patented LCS Knee
design, launched in 1985 after extensive clinical trials, has FDA Premarket
Approval for both cemented and cementless indications for use. The LCS
Knee design was the first, and continues to be the only, mobile-bearing
knee commercially available for use in the U.S. The LCS Knee has 19 years,
including initial development and clinical trials, of clinical history with
a 97% survival estimate at seven years. The LCS Knee is the number one
selling mobile-bearing knee implant worldwide and in the U.S. Within the
U.S. sales have been increasing as the implant's success rate becomes more
widely known and its clinical history is extended, providing more clinical
data of its success.
6
<PAGE>
AMK Total Knee System. Introduced in 1987, the AMK Total Knee System
is a fixed-bearing knee system with left and right, rather than universal,
femoral components. The AMK Knee may be used for primary and revision knee
surgery needs and has nine years of clinical follow-up history. In 1990,
the Company introduced the AMK PS (Posterior Stabilized) design, which is a
complementary product intended to address another industry trend toward
posterior stabilization of the knee joint, the fastest-growing area in the
knee implant market.
Coordinate System. The Coordinate system is a revision knee system
which uses the same instrumentation as the AMK Knee family of products.
Extremities. The Company believes the worldwide and U.S. markets in 1997
for extremities implants (shoulders, ankles, elbows, wrists and digits) were
nearly $112 million and nearly $75 million, respectively. Within the extremities
market, shoulder implants accounted for over 65% of 1997 sales worldwide and in
the U.S. DePuy believes it is the leading manufacturer of extremities implant
products overall and of shoulder implants. Once considered a difficult surgery
with questionable outcomes, the improved technology embodied in the Global Total
Shoulder System has helped the procedure gain acceptance. The Global Shoulder
was introduced in 1992, and became a market leader within four years in the U.S.
shoulder market.
Spinal Implants
One of the fastest-growing markets in musculoskeletal surgery, the spinal
implants market for 1997 was approximately $660 million in sales worldwide, with
approximately $430 million in the U.S. In 1993, the Company entered the spinal
market through a joint venture with Biedermann Motech GmbH of Germany. The
resulting company, DePuy Motech, is 80% owned by DePuy. This joint venture has
made the Company one of the worldwide leaders in the sale of spinal implant
devices in less than four years after its entry into the market. The Company's
1997 worldwide sales were $61.8 million.
The primary goals of spinal instrumentation systems are to correct for
spinal deformity or imbalance, to reestablish stability of the spine and to
eliminate pain. Hooks, rods, screws and anterior support devices (metallic,
ceramic and bone), acting as the equivalent of modular spinal anchoring devices,
are constructed by the surgeon to create an internal bracing mechanism.
Surgeons adapt these components to the specific pathology of the individual
patient, creating an implant construct intended to reconstruct and restore
normal spinal biomechanics or facilitate bone fusion.
DePuy Motech has differentiated itself from other manufacturers of spinal
implants by basing its implants on "load sharing", which advocates the support
of the spine both anteriorly (front) and posteriorly (back). This philosophy has
now become an important surgical trend in spinal surgery.
Among the Company's products is the MOSS System, the first system to
address the concept of load sharing and recognize the importance of anterior
column support to restore and balance the natural forces in the spine. The MOSS
Miami System, introduced in 1995, set new design standards, while continuing to
adhere to the Company's basic design philosophies. These are complete systems
made of both titanium and stainless steel and include anatomical hooks,
monoaxial and polyaxial screws and rods. They are designed for universal
application in spinal surgery for deformities, tumor, trauma and degenerative
diseases of the spinal column. These systems are marketed in the U.S. as spinal
devices for fusion and for bone repair under Section 510(k) Premarket
Notification ("510(k)") clearances. Within the U.S., DePuy markets the hooks
and pedicle screws with labeling restrictions. Outside the U.S.,
7
<PAGE>
marketing of pedicle screws for more general use, and the labeling and marketing
of the Company's surgical mesh product for use between vertebrae, is allowed.
The MOSS Miami System's availability in titanium alloy allows surgeons to use
Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computer Aided Tomography evaluation following
surgery and provides an implant system for patients who may be sensitive to the
nickel content of stainless steel.
Among DePuy Motech's other recent products is Titanium Surgical Mesh,
designed in Europe by Professor Jurgen Harms and Biedermann Motech, to provide a
synthetic device to reinforce weak bony tissue. This product has gained market
acceptance outside the U.S. and is marketed in the U.S. under 510(k) clearance
received by Biedermann Motech in 1990. DePuy Motech is conducting an IDE study
to further evaluate specific indications for use of Titanium Surgical Mesh. In
June 1996, the Company offered its Peak Anterior Cervical Compression Plate and
Peak Channeled Reconstruction Plate, part of the Peak Fixation System, for sale
outside the U.S. The Peak Anterior Cervical Compression Plate addresses
degenerative diseases of the anterior cervical spine and the Peak Channeled
Reconstruction Plate is used in surgery to stabilize bony structures. These
products are currently marketed in the U.S. under 510(k) clearances, with
labeling restrictions.
Trauma Products
The orthopaedic trauma field, which involves the management of fractures,
has as its objective the achievement of complete bone healing, or "union," and
restoration of alignment and full range of motion in patients who have sustained
fractures. The worldwide market for trauma products in 1997 was approximately
$1.2 billion in sales, of which approximately 42% were sales in the U.S. The
Company's fixation devices may be classified generally as external fixation
devices and internal fixation devices. The acquisition of DePuy ACE in 1994
added critical mass to the Company's trauma product offerings, specifically
adding products in the growing market of external fixation. Within the trauma
market, the Company, through DePuy ACE, is a leading manufacturer of titanium
alloy trauma products and externally applied fixation devices for the treatment
of fractured bones. DePuy ACE was a pioneer in the use of titanium alloy
implants in the orthopaedic trauma market. Titanium alloy more closely
replicates the physical properties of bone than stainless steel and is
associated with a higher degree of biocompatibility than stainless steel
implants. The Company had trauma product sales of $61.7 million worldwide in
1997, representing 5% of the market. DePuy ACE is a market leader in Japan, the
second largest geographic market for trauma products.
Sports Medicine Products
The sports medicine market, which includes arthroscopy equipment, soft
tissue implants, braces and cold therapy, amounted to over $1.2 billion in sales
worldwide in 1997, including approximately $920 million in the U.S. The soft
goods market, which includes knee immobilizers, supports/splints and traction
supplies amounted to approximately $400 million worldwide. The Company expanded
its position in these areas through its acquisition of DePuy OrthoTech in March
1996, which added critical mass and expanded product lines. The Company's
aggregate sales of sports medicine products in 1997, including soft goods, were
$50.3 million worldwide.
The Company's products include arthroscopy instruments, anterior cruciate
ligament reconstructive guide systems, tissue fixation devices, cold therapy
management systems, foot and ankle supports and orthopaedic knee braces. Within
its knee brace product line, the Company offers a complete
8
<PAGE>
line of custom-made braces which are used by professional athletes in a number
of sports. The Company also offers a complete line of high-quality, off-the-
shelf knee braces.
Cement
To complement cemented reconstructive product lines, the Company entered
the bone cement market in 1994 through the acquisition of CMW. CMW manufactures
different types of bone cements used with reconstructive implants and had 1997
sales of approximately $20 million. Early in 1997, CMW received FDA clearance
to market one type of its bone cement directly in the U.S. and additional
versions are awaiting clearance for marketing in the U.S.
Operating Room Products
To complement its reconstructive products, the Company developed a
comprehensive line of products designed to shield healthcare workers, surgeons
and patients during surgery from cross-contamination and contact with body
fluids which could contain potentially infectious bacteria. Orthopaedic
reconstructive surgery carries a higher risk of such contamination or contacts
than many other types of surgeries because the instrumentation required scatters
microscopic particles, including bone and blood.
The Company's product offerings include a series of cut-, stick- and
puncture-resistant glove liners, developed and marketed by DePuy DuPont
Orthopaedics, which incorporate Kevlar material, a lightweight fabric used in
military helmets and in flack jackets that is stronger than steel. Other
products include the Sterile View System, "space suits" that shield and filter
airborne particulates, and the Cida-system, a line of germicidal products
designed to ensure the cleanest possible surgical environment. The Company also
markets power and manual instruments, wound drainage and tourniquet systems,
smoke evacuation systems and instrument repair services.
Product Development
The Company conducts its research and development programs to maintain its
proprietary position by making improvements to existing products and by
developing new generations of products focused on new materials, unique designs,
biologic biomaterials, and new non-invasive or minimally-invasive forms of
treatment for afflictions and injuries currently requiring surgery.
In-house, Company-sponsored research and development programs at Warsaw,
Indiana; Leeds, United Kingdom and Roanne, France focus on enhancements to the
metallic and polyethylene components of the implant and instrument devices the
Company manufactures by increasing their strength, corrosion and oxidation
resistance, fatigue resistance, or focusing on bearing surface improvements to
the artificial joint being replaced in the human body. In addition, the Company
conducts research on artificial joint simulators and enhancements to the bearing
interface. The Company has also been instrumental in identifying and eliminating
the oxidative effects caused by gamma irradiation sterilization techniques to
UHMWPE by pioneering the use of gas plasma sterilization technology for
polyethylene bearing components.
As part of its long-range product development efforts, the Company
initiated programs in 1990 in the biotechnology arena with an emphasis on
orthobiologics and biologic biomaterials. The Company is researching
technologies for the next century in the area of bone substitutes, cartilage
regeneration,
9
<PAGE>
ligament and tendon reconstruction and musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Some
of these efforts, however, if successful, are not expected to produce material
product revenue until, at the earliest, the beginning of the next decade.
Musculoskeletal and Tissue Regeneration. In the early 1990s, the demand
for musculoskeletal tissue to repair traumatic and sports related injuries
increased. At present, there are limited means of repairing injuries such as a
rotator cuff deficiency or a meniscus tear. For certain other types of injury
(particularly damage to ligaments and tendons), current treatment requires the
use of tissue from another site on the patient's body, thereby increasing
chances of morbidity and surgery costs. To address these problems DePuy moved
into tissue engineering research by entering into an exclusive license agreement
with Purdue University in March 1992 to develop a tissue engineering concept
using Small Intestine Submucosa ("SIS"). SIS is a patented xenographic
biomaterial that may be used as a scaffold in tissue engineering applications.
SIS has been shown to facilitate the regeneration, repair and re-growth of the
patient's own tissues at various anatomical sites. The Company is investigating
SIS for ligament, tendon, bone, cartilage, meniscus and rotator cuff
applications. In late 1996, the Company filed an IDE application for anterior
cruciate ligament replacement using SIS. Approval was granted in December 1997
to initiate Phase I human clinical trials. Two of the twelve patients allotted
for this clinical trial have been implanted with SIS anterior cruciate ligament
devices and no complications have been noted to date.
With orthopaedic surgeons identifying cartilage repair and bone substitute
materials as significant needs, DePuy entered into an exclusive license
agreement with Genentech, Inc. in February 1992 which allows DePuy the right to
evaluate the use of Transforming Growth Factor Beta One ("TGF-B1") for
orthopaedic applications. TGF-B1 has been shown to aid in bone regeneration and
remodeling and to inhibit bone resorption, along with stimulating articular
cartilage repair and regeneration. The Company is studying alternate methods of
utilizing TGF-B1 for bone regeneration through gene therapy and is investigating
the effects, both local and systemic, of direct applications of TGF-B1 to
stimulate cartilage repair and regeneration. Initial studies in vitro and in
vivo have demonstrated increased cartilage cell proliferation and matrix
synthesis.
The Company is also involved in an orthobiologic program aimed at
addressing joint trauma and degeneration. The Company is researching articular
cartilage repair and bone regeneration through collaborations with companies
utilizing resorbable polymers, cell technology applications and gene therapy
delivery mechanisms. In addition, the Company is working with Matrix
Biotechnologies, Inc., in which the Company has a minority interest, to research
and develop cartilage repair products, including materials, procedures and
related instrumentation, without the need for prosthetics. One focus of this
collaboration is the development of technology for the repair and/or
regeneration of focal articular cartilage defects using a bioresorbable device
which can be placed at the defect site to promote the body's own ability to
repair cartilage damage.
Biomaterials. In July 1987, DePuy signed an exclusive research agreement
with E.I. DuPont DeNemours and Company to investigate the use of advanced
biomaterials (polymers, composites and resorbables) in orthopaedic applications
and formed a partnership, DePuy DuPont Orthopaedics, in 1989 to distribute new
products developed by the joint venture. This venture has already introduced a
number of new products, including the Hylamer family of orthopaedic bearing
polymers consisting of UHMWPE bearing surfaces. The polymers, available for use
exclusively in the Company's hip, knee and shoulder implants, are designed to
resist wear, deformation and material degradation, providing greater strength
than traditional polymers. Recently, the venture gained FDA 510(k) approval to
market and sell
10
<PAGE>
an improved cross-linked UHMWPE named Marathon. This new polymer bearing has
demonstrated considerable improvements in functional wear studies. The newly-
designed metacarpal phalangeal finger spacer/implant, NeuFlex, was released late
in 1997. Further improvements to UHMWPE, composite implant designs, resorbable
materials for screws, anchors and other fixation devices, as well as continued
research in the area of fibers, elastomers and other polymers are at various
stages in the research and product development cycle.
MARKETING AND SALES
The Company markets and distributes its products through a global
distribution network. Distribution within the U.S. is through a combination of
Company-owned sales offices that supervise independent commissioned sales
associates and a number of independent commissioned sales agents. Outside the
U.S., the majority of the Company's sales are conducted through Company-owned
distribution outlets, although the Company still distributes some products
through independent distributors in certain international markets. To promote
its key products, the Company collaborates with surgeons with national and, in
many cases, international reputations in the relevant area of orthopaedic
surgery and neurosurgery. These "surgeon champions" use and study the product
and participate in learning centers and other educational or professional
activities to educate other doctors on the use of the product.
The Company's business is generally not seasonal in nature. However, the
number of elective orthopaedic surgeries performed tends to decline during the
summer months.
United States
The Company markets its orthopaedic products in the United States through a
network of approximately 500 independent, commissioned sales associates managed
by 19 Company-employed territory general managers and five independent sales
agents as of December 31, 1997. This structure has been evolving since 1994. The
salesforce was reorganized as described below to create a structure where
requisite investments in personnel, training and instruments would be made in
the Company's new product areas such as spinal implants and trauma products. The
reorganization also allowed the Company to ensure that sales associates were
receiving appropriate incentives and compensation and to eliminate the
involvement of those sales agents who were unproductive.
For many decades, as was typical in the industry, the Company distributed
its products in the U.S. exclusively through a network of independent
commissioned sales agents, each assigned a geographic territory in which the
agent had the exclusive right to solicit orders for the Company's products.
Sales agents established and maintained personal contact with customers and
provided services related to the products sold, such as attending surgeries to
ensure that the surgeon had the correct size of implant and the necessary
instrumentation. In exchange for soliciting orders, the sales agents were paid
a commission on the invoice price of all orders shipped to their respective
territory.
As the Company's business expanded, in both product offering and share of
market, in the 1980s and 1990s the sales agents were no longer able to maintain
personal customer contact with all of the customers in their respective
territories. As a result they began hiring independent sales associates who
they assigned to segments of their territories and who in time took over
customer and surgeon contact. The sales associates were compensated by the
sales agent in accordance with separate arrangements between the sales agent and
sales associates.
11
<PAGE>
In mid-1994, sales agents who were not managing their areas and sales
associates to the Company's satisfaction began to be replaced with territory
sales managers, who were charged with managing the territory and the sales
associates who work there. Sales associates continue to function as before but
are now compensated directly by the Company through commissions. The Company
provides the investment in training, support and general administrative
services.
Trauma and sports medicine products are both marketed through a combination
of dedicated sales representatives and the Company's reconstructive implant
marketing system of sales associates, sales agents and territory sales managers.
In some areas, the Company has dedicated sales representatives for each product
line, while in others the sales agents and sales associates sell all of the
Company's product lines. In addition to the Company's sales agents, sales
associates and territory sales managers, DePuy ACE uses two independent sales
agents who do not carry any other DePuy products. DePuy OrthoTech's dedicated
salesforce consists of its own 79-person employee sales organization and one
regional distributor. Spinal implant products are marketed through a
specialized sales force.
To address the changing customer base in the U.S. orthopaedic market
resulting from healthcare reform and the emergence of managed care, the Company
has strengthened its national contracts department and added a managed care area
to its sales department. See "Business--Industry Overview".
International
The Company distributes its products outside the United States and Canada,
for the most part, through a number of distribution subsidiaries. Establishing
a separate distribution channel in each country has been a critical part of the
Company's strategy for marketing abroad. Knowledge of, and on site compliance
with, each country's regulatory scheme requires the presence and unique
knowledge of a local distributor. The ability to communicate with physicians,
nurses and other operating room personnel in their own language, is also
important. In addition, successful marketing requires an understanding of each
country's healthcare system and its purchasing and reimbursement practices.
Until 1988, all of the Company's sales outside the United States and Canada were
to distributors who purchased the products, sold on their own account and
established prices to their customers. Beginning in 1988 with the acquisition
of the former Chevalier A.G. (now DePuy A.G.) in Switzerland, and continuing
through the present time, the Company has followed a strategy of establishing a
separate Company-owned subsidiary with DePuy employed salesmen in each major
market or potential major market. These subsidiaries establish the prices for
the products sold in their respective countries, first purchasing them from the
Company and then reselling them at retail. In major markets, this process has
sometimes involved the acquisition of the Company's previous distributor or
entering into a joint venture with such distributor. In other markets, new
companies have been created or are being formed at the present time. The
Company now has distribution subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Canada,
Germany, France, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Sweden,
Japan, Korea, Singapore, Mexico, Taiwan, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Australia,
New Zealand, Argentina, India and Hong Kong.
Japan represents a significant market for the Company's trauma products.
DePuy ACE has a longstanding exclusive arrangement with Japan Medical Dynamic
Marketing, an independent distributor, to sell DePuy ACE's products.
In the sports medicine market, DePuy OrthoTech has an exclusive
distribution arrangement with Beiersdorf AG covering Germany, Austria, Belgium,
Spain and The Netherlands.
12
<PAGE>
For a breakdown of the Company's sales by geographic region and product,
see "Business--Products." Additional information regarding sales, operating
income and identifiable assets are disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements contained herein.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The Company holds domestic and foreign patents covering certain of its
systems, components and instrumentation, has patent applications pending with
respect to certain implant components and certain surgical instrumentation and
anticipates that it will apply for additional patents it deems appropriate. In
addition, the Company holds licenses from third parties to utilize certain
patents, patent applications and technology utilized in the design of some of
its devices. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for information concerning patent
infringement suits involving the Company.
In addition, the Company relies on non-patented proprietary know-how, trade
secrets, processes and other proprietary information, which the Company protects
through a variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and
proprietary information agreements.
The Company markets its LCS Knee through an exclusive, worldwide license to
manufacture and sell the LCS Knee under patents owned by Biomedical Engineering
Trust ("BET").
The Company and its subsidiaries market their products under a number of
trademarks.
MANUFACTURING
The Company's manufacturing operations are carried out at a number of
facilities owned or leased by the Company or its subsidiaries. In 1995 and
1996, the Company obtained ISO 9001 series registration for its manufacturing
facilities in Warsaw, Indiana; Leeds, England; Blackpool, England; and Los
Angeles, California and ISO 9002 for its Albuquerque, New Mexico facilities.
The Company is in the process of obtaining appropriate ISO registration for its
other facilities. ISO 9001 and ISO 9002 are internationally recognized quality
standards for manufacturing. ISO certification assists the Company in marketing
its products in certain foreign markets. See "Business--Government Regulation."
The Company devotes significant attention to quality control in
manufacturing its products. At the main reconstructive products manufacturing
facilities, the quality control measures begin with an inspection of all raw
materials and castings to be used in implants. Each piece is inspected at each
step of the manufacturing process. As a final step, products pass through a
"clean room" environment designed and maintained to reduce product exposure to
particulate matter. The Company utilizes a new gas plasma sterilization system
for its implants which was cleared with the FDA through the 510(k) process. The
Company is the first and only company to receive such clearance for the
industrial application of gas plasma sterilization. This process reduces the
possibility of oxidation of polyethylene and is believed not to pose the
environmental threats of other methods of sterilization.
Approximately 75% of the Company's products are manufactured in-house, with
the remaining 25% outsourced. Approximately 70% of DePuy ACE's trauma products
are presently outsourced. The Company intends to bring all trauma implant
manufacturing in-house over time. The primary raw materials used in the
manufacture of the Company's reconstructive products are cobalt chromium alloy,
stainless steel alloys, titanium alloy and UHMWPE. Certain components used,
primarily castings and forgings which are the major material components of most
implants, are purchased from a limited number
13
<PAGE>
of suppliers. However, the Company has back-up sources for all of its materials
and believes that adequate capacity exists at its suppliers to meet all
anticipated needs.
As part of its business strategy, the Company has implemented manufacturing
procedures to reduce costs and improve efficiencies as well as inventory
management and control systems. The Company is incorporating manufacturing
efficiencies into the design of instruments and is redesigning current
instruments to reduce manufacturing costs. Due in large measure to these
process improvements, manufacturing lead times have been considerably reduced.
The Company also uses robotics to increase the manufacturing efficiency of its
orthopaedic products. In addition, in 1996, the Company purchased one of its
major instrument suppliers to further reduce costs and shorten the time required
to get instruments to market.
In its trauma products, the Company uses commercial titanium and titanium
alloy in addition to stainless steel alloys. The Company competes with both
government and commercial aerospace requirements for titanium, as well as golf
equipment manufacturers. The aerospace industry controls both the price and
supply of titanium products and can dramatically affect both the cost and
availability of such materials. To address this concern, DePuy ACE has entered
into a long-term agreement with its primary titanium supplier.
In its sports medicine products, the Company uses rolled cloth goods,
metals, plastics and foams, all of which are of standard stock and are readily
available from a number of sources.
COMPETITION
The orthopaedic device industry is highly competitive and has been
characterized by innovation, technological change and advancement. Major
companies that compete in the total joint implant market, some of which also
market complementary non-implant lines that compete with the Company's other
products, include Biomet Inc.; Zimmer, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bristol-Myers
Squibb Company; Howmedica Worldwide, a subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc.; Smith &
Nephew Orthopaedics, a division of Smith & Nephew Ltd.; Osteonics, Inc., a
subsidiary of the Stryker Corporation; Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc., a
subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson; and Protek, Allopro and Sulzer Orthopedics, all
divisions of Sulzer Limited. In the spinal instrumentation area, the Company's
main competitors are Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.; Synthes; AcroMed Corporation;
Cross Medical Products, Inc., Spine-Tech, Inc. and United States Surgical.
Competition within the orthopaedic implant industry is primarily based on
customer service, product design and performance, ease of use, peer influence
among surgeons and results of the product over time. In recent years, price has
become increasingly important as the industry matures and healthcare providers
become more concerned with costs. At the present time, price is a factor in the
sale of those devices where differentiation of the product cannot be clearly
proven and the decision to buy is not significantly influenced by the surgeon.
Additionally, as healthcare providers become more cost-conscious, the use of
higher-priced devices has become increasingly limited to younger, more active
patients, while lesser-priced devices are used in patients with a lower demand
(i.e., shorter life expectancy and/or lower activity level). The Company
believes that its future success depends upon providing high-quality service to
all customers, offering a wide range of quality products at different pricing
points, continuing to promote its key products and their already existing long-
term successful outcomes and clinical results, pursuing additional strategic
agreements with buying groups, offering a wide array of ancillary products used
by the orthopaedic community and continuing to pursue, through
14
<PAGE>
research and development efforts, new products and services that can set the
Company apart from its competitors.
The Company's trauma product lines compete with products of Biomet, Inc.;
Zimmer, Inc.; Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics, a division of Smith & Nephew Ltd;
Howmedica, Inc., a subsidiary of Pfizer; Mathys Medical Ltd.; Stratec Medical;
Synthes and Orthofix International N.V. Competition in this area is primarily
based on service, product design and performance, technological advances,
reputation and price.
In the sports medicine product area, the Company competes with numerous
other companies, principally Smith & Nephew Donjoy, Innovation Sports, Inc. and
Lenox Hill Brace Co., Inc., a division of Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. The
Company believes that the principal competitive factors affecting the sports
medicine product field are customer service, product performance, technology,
reputation and price. It believes that its service and technology distinguish
it favorably from its competitors in the marketing and sale of its products.
In the cement market, the Company competes with numerous other companies,
primarily Howmedica, Inc., Schering-Plough Corp. and Zimmer, Inc.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1997, the Company had approximately 3,220 employees
worldwide, including approximately 1,090 engaged in the Company's U.S.
reconstructive device business, approximately 70 employed by DePuy Motech,
approximately 210 employed by DePuy ACE, approximately 430 employed by DePuy
OrthoTech, and approximately 1,420 engaged in the Company's international
businesses.
Approximately 320 employees in the Warsaw, Indiana facility are represented
by the United Paperworkers International Union, Local No. 7809, and are subject
to a five year collective bargaining agreement expiring in June 2002.
Approximately 215 employees in the Leeds, England facility are represented by
the Amalgamated Engineering and Electrical Union and are subject to a collective
bargaining agreement which expires in April 1999. In addition, approximately 20
employees at the Leeds, England facility are represented by the Manufacturing
Scientific and Finance Union.
The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory, and that
its relationships with all unions representing its workers are non-adversarial
and cooperative.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Company's operations are subject to rigorous governmental agency
regulation in the United States and certain other countries.
The FDA regulates the testing, labeling, manufacturing and marketing of
medical devices to ensure that medical products distributed in the United States
are safe and effective for their intended uses. The FDA also regulates the
export of medical devices manufactured in the United States to international
markets.
15
<PAGE>
Under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended, medical devices are
classified into one of three classes depending on the degree of risk the medical
device imparts to patients. Class I devices are those for which safety and
effectiveness can be assured by adherence to General Controls, which include
compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices ("GMPs") and Quality Systems
Regulations, facility and device registrations and listings, reporting of
adverse medical events, and appropriate truthful and non-misleading labeling,
advertising and promotional materials. Some Class I devices also require
premarket review and clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) process described
below. Class II devices are those which are subject to General Controls as well
as premarket demonstration of adherence to certain Performance Standards or
other Special Controls as specified by the FDA. Premarket review and clearance
by the FDA for these devices is accomplished through the 510(k) Premarket
Notification procedure. In the 510(k) procedure, the manufacturer submits
appropriate information to the FDA in a Premarket Notification submission. If
the FDA determines that the device is "substantially equivalent" to a device
that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976, the date upon which the Medical
Device Amendments of 1976 were enacted, or to another commercially available
similar device subsequently cleared through the 510(k) process, it will grant
clearance to commercially market the device. It generally takes from three to
12 months from the date of submission to obtain clearance of a 510(k)
submission, but may take longer.
A Class III product is a product which has a wholly new intended use or is
based on advances in technology for which the device's safety and effectiveness
cannot be assured solely by the General Controls, Performance Standards and
Special Controls applied to Class I and II devices. These devices often require
formal clinical investigation studies to assess their safety and effectiveness.
A PMA from the FDA is required before marketing of a Class III product can
proceed. The PMA process is much more extensive than the 510(k) process. In
order to obtain a PMA, Class III devices, or a particular intended use of any
such devices, usually must undergo clinical trials pursuant to an application
submitted by the manufacturer for an IDE. An approved IDE exempts the
manufacturer from the otherwise applicable FDA regulations and grants approval
for the conduct of the human clinical investigation to generate the clinical
data necessary to scientifically evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Class
III device or intended use. When a manufacturer believes that sufficient pre-
clinical and clinical data has been generated to prove the safety and efficacy
of the new device or new intended use, it may submit a PMA application to the
FDA. An FDA review of a PMA application generally takes one to two years from
the date the PMA application is accepted for filing, but may take significantly
longer.
The Company's products include both pre-amendment and post-amendment Class
I, II and III medical devices. Most pre-amendment devices (those marketed prior
to the enactment of the Medical Device Amendment of 1976) are, in general, Class
I and Class II devices and are exempt from such Premarket Approval requirements,
as are post-amendment Class I and Class II devices. All currently marketed
devices hold the relevant exemptions or premarket clearances or approvals, as
applicable, required under federal medical device law.
In addition, the Company's manufacturing processes are required to comply
with GMP and Quality Systems Regulations which cover the methods and
documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance,
labeling, packaging and shipping of the Company's products. The Company's
facilities, records and manufacturing processes are subject to periodic
scheduled and unscheduled inspections by the FDA or other agencies.
The Company is also subject to regulations in many of the foreign countries
in which it sells its products in the areas of product standards, packaging
requirements, labeling requirements, import
16
<PAGE>
restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. Many of the
regulations applicable to the Company's devices and products in such countries
are similar to those of the FDA. The national health or social security
organizations of certain such countries require the Company's products to be
qualified before they can be marketed in those countries. To date, the Company
has not experienced difficulty in complying with these regulations.
The Company is also implementing policies and procedures intended to allow
it to position itself for the changing international regulatory environment.
The ISO 9000 series of standards has been developed as an internationally
recognized set of guidelines that are aimed at ensuring the design and
manufacture of quality products. A company that passes an ISO audit and obtains
ISO registration becomes internationally recognized as being well run and
functioning under a competent quality system. In certain foreign markets, it
may be necessary or advantageous to obtain ISO 9000 series certification, which,
in some ways, is analogous to compliance with the FDA's GMP and Quality Systems
Requirements. The European Union has promulgated rules which require that
medical products receive a CE mark by mid-1998. A CE mark is an international
symbol of adherence to certain standards and compliance with applicable European
medical device requirements and certification. ISO 9000 series certification is
one of the prerequisites for CE marking of most of the Company's products.
Certain of the Company's facilities have received ISO certification and ISO
certification is being pursued at the others. See "Business--Manufacturing."
In addition, the Company must obtain export certificates from the FDA
before it can export some of its products.
Certain provisions of the Social Security Act, commonly known as the
"Medicare Fraud and Abuse Statute," prohibit entities, such as the Company, from
offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any form of remuneration in return for
the referral of Medicare or state health program patients or patient care
opportunities, or in return for the recommendation, arrangement, purchase, lease
or order of items or services that are covered by Medicare or state health
programs. Many states have adopted similar prohibitions against payments
intended to induce referrals of Medicaid and other third-party payer patients.
Federal physician self-referral legislation prohibits, subject to certain
exemptions, a physician or a member of his immediate family from referring
Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity providing "designated health
services" in which the physician has an ownership or investment interest, or
with which the physician has entered into a compensation arrangement.
17
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
As of December 31, 1997, the Company owned or leased the following
facilities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APPROXIMATE LEASED OR
LOCATION TYPE OF FACILITY SQUARE FOOTAGE OWNED
- ------------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Warsaw, Indiana(1).................. Executive Offices, Research and 260,200 Owned
Development, Manufacturing
and Distribution
El Segundo, California(2)........... Executive Offices, Research and 114,000 Leased
Development, Manufacturing
and Distribution
St. Louis, Missouri................. Warehousing and Distribution 100,900 Leased
Tracy, California(3)................ Corporate Offices and 129,000 Leased
Manufacturing
Albuquerque, New Mexico............. Manufacturing 20,600 Leased
Los Alamitos, California............ Manufacturing and Repair 2,919 Leased
Services
Dayton, Ohio........................ Manufacturing 7,700 Leased
Leeds, England(4)................... Corporate Offices, Research and 158,000 Owned
Development, Manufacturing
and Warehousing
Leeds, England...................... Manufacturing 32,400 Owned
Barnet, England..................... Manufacturing and Research 30,000 Owned
and Development
Blackpool, England.................. Manufacturing 28,500 Leased
Chaumont, France.................... Administrative Offices 33,300 Owned
Chaumont, France.................... Administrative Offices and 126,300 Leased
Manufacturing
Roanne, France...................... Manufacturing 33,700 Leased
Toulouse, France.................... Manufacturing 29,100 Owned
Villeurbanne, France................ Manufacturing 27,600 Leased
Villeurbanne, France................ Manufacturing 11,000 Owned
</TABLE>
_________________________
(1) The Company's principal executive offices and primary U.S. manufacturing
plant for reconstructive devices. The facility also currently serves as a
distribution facility.
(2) Corporate offices of DePuy ACE and main manufacturing plant for trauma
products.
(3) Corporate offices of DePuy OrthoTech and main manufacturing plant for
sports medicine products.
(4) Corporate offices and primary manufacturing facility for DePuy
International.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In 1990, the Company voluntarily recalled certain acetabular cups. Of all
such products sold and implemented, less than 2% have resulted in incidents of
product failure reported by the Company. Of those reported incidents, as of
March 13, 1998, 314 resulted in claims against the Company for product failure,
of which all but 39 have been settled. Of those settled incidents, 106 were in
litigation. Thirty-
18
<PAGE>
four claims remain in litigation. All such claims and suits have been treated
as one occurrence under the applicable insurance policies. Any additional
claims will be paid by the Company's insurers.
On April 20, 1994, DePuy Motech was served with a class action complaint,
entitled Barbara Brown et al. v. DePuy Motech et al. filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on behalf of individuals who claim
to have been damaged through the use of various types of surgical screws
implanted in spinal pedicles. DePuy ACE was subsequently served with this
complaint as well. Numerous other manufacturers of spinal products, hospitals,
physicians, medical societies and other associations were also sued. The suits
allege tortious misconduct against all manufacturers engaged in spinal product
manufacture and sale, several surgeons, industry associations and professional
medical associations. Specific counts range from product liability and
negligence to various conspiracies allegedly involving efforts to mislead the
FDA into approving the use of the screws in spinal pedicles. DePuy Motech has
been named in approximately 600 lawsuits for damages filed on behalf of
individuals who claim to have been damaged through the use of various types of
surgical screws in spinal pedicles. On August 4, 1994, the Federal Judicial
Panel on multidistrict litigation ordered that all federal court cases be
transferred to and consolidated for pretrial proceedings, including the
determination of class certification, in the Federal District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On February 22, 1995, Chief Judge Emeritus
Louis C. Bechtle denied class certification. Individual suits followed that
denial. A hearing ordered by the Court to determine if any factual basis exists
to support the conspiracy count was held July 23, 1996. On August 22, 1996,
Judge Bechtle issued an order dismissing without prejudice claims based on
allegations of conspiracy and fraud and requiring that any amended complaint be
filed by September 30, 1996, which deadline was subsequently extended to October
30, 1996. Amended or new complaints on behalf of approximately 850 plaintiffs
alleging liability of DePuy Motech based solely on a theory of industry-wide
conspiracy have been served after the August 22, 1996 dismissal order. Many,
but not all, of these conspiracy complaints also name DePuy ACE as a defendant.
In April, 1997, Judge Bechtle dismissed claims based on allegations of
conspiracy to defraud the FDA but allowed claims based on allegations of
conspiracy to defraud doctors at medical meetings to continue. Twenty
plaintiffs in the multidistrict litigation allege implantations of products
which were sold by DePuy Motech or DePuy ACE. Two product claims and a smaller
number of conspiracy claims are pending in state courts. DePuy ACE and DePuy
Motech have responded to certain discovery initiated by the Plaintiffs' Legal
Committee, including a number of depositions of DePuy ACE and DePuy Motech
personnel. Beginning in December, 1997, 325 cases were remanded to their
appropriate state or federal courts. Seventy-seven of these cases allege
conspiracy by DePuy ACE and/or DePuy Motech. The Company believes that it has
substantial defenses to all these claims and will continue to defend them
vigorously, although no assurance can be given of the eventual outcome of this
litigation.
On February 25, 1995, DePuy filed suit against BET, its licensor for
technology used in the LCS Knee in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Indiana. The case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Jersey on April 25, 1996. DePuy is seeking a declaratory
judgment as to the proper construction of contract language relating to the
calculation of royalties on sales of various licensed products to purchasers
outside the United States. BET has counterclaimed seeking damages and a
declaration ordering DePuy to continue to pay royalties after the expiration of
the patents to which the royalties relate. DePuy has filed a motion for partial
summary judgment which has not been ruled on.
Joint Medical Products Corporation ("Joint Medical") filed a complaint on
April 3, 1995 in the U.S. District Court of Connecticut against DePuy Inc. and
several other manufacturers of orthopaedic devices. The suit seeks injunctive
relief and treble damages for DePuy's alleged infringement of a patent
19
<PAGE>
owned by Joint Medical. DePuy has made a counterclaim seeking to have the
patent declared invalid and unenforceable. The Company believes it has
substantial defenses and is aggressively defending this action. The same patent
was the subject of an interference proceeding in the United States Patent and
Trademark Office between Joint Medical and a patentee from whom the Company has
a license. On October 3, 1996 Joint Medical, which has been acquired by Johnson
& Johnson, announced that, as a result of an agreement to arbitrate between
Joint Medical and the patentee from whom the Company has a license, it has
prevailed in the interference proceeding, and established its right to ownership
of the patent. The resolution of the interference proceeding does not affect
the defenses the Company has against the claims of Joint Medical. Additionally,
as a result of the purchase of Joint Medical by Johnson & Johnson and the
agreement between Joint Medical and the patentee from whom the Company has a
license and the terms under which the interference proceedings were submitted to
arbitration, the Company has filed suit to add both the patentee from whom the
Company has a license and Johnson & Johnson as defendants and to assert
additional claims against Joint Medical.
In addition, the Company is party to certain other routine litigation
incidental to its business. The Company does not believe that any litigation to
which it is a party is likely, individually or in the aggregate, to have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or
results of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Not Applicable.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Set forth below are the names, ages, positions and a brief description of
the Company's executive officers:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ------------------------- ----- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
James A. Lent............ 55 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer
Michael J. Dormer........ 46 President and Chief Operating Officer
Robert E. Morel.......... 60 President, DePuy ACE
James M. Taylor.......... 41 President, DePuy International
William E. Tidmore, Jr... 55 President, DePuy Motech
Steven L. Artusi......... 53 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
R. Michael McCaffrey..... 55 President, DePuy Development, Inc.
Thomas J. Oberhausen..... 45 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
G. Taylor Seward......... 52 Senior Vice President, Personnel
</TABLE>
James A. Lent has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DePuy since
1991, having served as President from 1985 to 1991. Prior to joining DePuy, Mr.
Lent worked for Johnson & Johnson from 1967 to 1985, serving as President of J&J
Orthopaedics from 1982 to 1985. Mr. Lent is also a director of Spectranetics
Inc., a cardiovascular device company.
20
<PAGE>
Michael J. Dormer has been President and Chief Operating Officer of DePuy
since August 1996. Prior to that, he served as President of DePuy International
since 1993 and as Executive Vice President from 1992 until 1993.
Robert E. Morel has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
DePuy ACE since May 1996. From 1993 until 1996, he served as Senior Vice
President, Operations for DePuy. From 1985, when he originally joined DePuy,
until 1993, he was Vice President, Operations.
James M. Taylor has been President of DePuy International since August
1996. He joined DePuy in July 1994 as Vice President, Operations. From June
1993 until April 1994, Mr. Taylor was the Chief Executive Officer of MSS Group
in the U.K. From 1989 to June 1993, Mr. Taylor was employed by Chloride
Industrial Batteries Ltd., as Operations Director.
William E. Tidmore, Jr. has served as President of DePuy Motech since
August 1996. Prior to that, he served as President of DePuy Orthopaedics, a
division of DePuy, from 1994 to 1996, as Executive Vice President of DePuy from
1993 to 1994, as President of DePuy International from 1992 to 1993 and as Vice
President, International of DePuy Inc. from 1988 until 1992. Mr. Tidmore joined
DePuy in 1986.
Steven L. Artusi has served as the Company's Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary since 1992. Mr. Artusi served as Vice President, Legal
and Regulatory Affairs for DePuy, Division of BMC from 1987 to 1992 and as
Corporate Counsel of BMC from 1985 to 1987.
R. Michael McCaffrey became President of DePuy Development, Inc., which is
engaged in business development for the DePuy worldwide group, in August 1996.
Prior to that, from 1994 until 1996, he was President of DePuy Motech, from 1990
until 1994 he was President of DePuy, and from 1985 until 1990 held various
positions at DePuy in management, marketing and sales.
Thomas J. Oberhausen has served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of DePuy since 1992 and from 1993 to 1995, he also served as
the Finance Director for DePuy International. He joined Bio-Dynamics, Inc., a
subsidiary of BMC, in 1980.
G. Taylor Seward has served as Senior Vice President, Personnel of DePuy
since 1990. Mr. Seward joined DePuy in 1978 and prior to 1990 held various
positions in DePuy's human resources department, including Personnel Manager,
Director of Personnel and Vice President, Personnel.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company's common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the ticker symbol DPU. Daily trading activity and common stock prices can be
found in the financial section of most major newspapers under the listing
"Depuy." At December 31, 1997, the number of shareholders of record of DePuy's
outstanding common stock was 1,265.
21
<PAGE>
The range of high and low bid information for DePuy common stock was
reported as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 Quarter Ended Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
High 24 25 3/8 27 9/16 30 1/2
Low 18 1/8 19 7/8 21 1/2 23 3/4
Close 21 7/8 23 26 3/4 28 3/4
1996 Quarter Ended/(1)/ Mar 31 Jun 30 Sep 30 Dec 31
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
High - - - 20 1/4
Low - - - 16 1/2
Close - - - 20 1/4
</TABLE>
/(1)/ DePuy common stock began public trading on October 31, 1996.
An initial annual cash dividend of $.12 per share was paid January 2, 1998,
to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 1, 1997.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following table summarizes the Company's unaudited operating results by
quarter for 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Dec Sep Jun Mar Dec Sep Jun Mar
(in millions, except per share data) 1997 1997 1997 1997 1996 1996 1996 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $197.1 $180.5 $204.8 $187.8 $181.0 $167.3 $175.9 $173.1
Gross profit 142.9 129.2 137.3 131.8 127.3 118.5 122.8 119.7
Net income 30.3 28.7 32.5 31.3 27.1 24.0 28.2 27.4
Basic and diluted earnings .31 .29 .33 .32 .28 .27 .31 .31
per share (pro forma for 1996)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE>
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except per share data) 1997/(1)/ 1996/(1)/ 1995 1994 1993
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 770.2 $ 697.3 $ 636.6 $ 551.8 $ 466.7
Cost of sales 229.0 209.0 200.2 173.0 151.9
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Gross profit 541.2 488.3 436.4 378.8 314.8
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 296.6 266.8 230.6 195.0 157.8
Research and development expenses 28.4 21.7 21.3 18.6 17.4
Goodwill amortization 14.7 12.3 14.2 14.1 10.0
Special items, net 8.5 -- -- -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Operating income 193.0 187.5 170.3 151.1 129.6
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Interest and other, net (income)
expense (1.6) 2.5 5.1 .9 2.7
Provision for income taxes 70.9 78.7 72.7 65.8 57.0
Minority interest expense 2.1 1.6 .5 .7 --/(2)/
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliate 1.2 2.0 2.9 3.1 2.3
----------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Net income $ 122.8 $ 106.7 $ 94.9 $ 86.8 $ 72.2
=========== =========== =========== ========== ============
Basic and diluted earnings per
share/(3)/ $ 1.25 $ 1.17 $ 1.05 $ .96 $ .80
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding/(3)/ 98,603 91,430 90,000 90,000 90,000
</TABLE>
(1) Financial results include the effects of acquisitions as outlined in Note 1
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Prior to 1994, minority interest expense was immaterial and included in
interest and other, net (income) expense.
(3) Unaudited pro forma data for 1995 and 1996 and historical data for 1993 and
1994, giving effect to the number of common shares outstanding after the
reorganization described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except other data) 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
----------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Working capital $ 403.2 $369.1 $176.8 $150.9 $ 99.3
Total assets 1,080.7 898.0 623.3 567.5 386.0
Total noncurrent liabilities 111.0 46.2 73.5 68.4 22.7
Shareholders' equity $ 762.1 $670.6 $378.1 $357.1 $247.8
Full-time employee equivalents 3,217 2,926 2,298 2,157 1,768
</TABLE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
OVERVIEW
DePuy is one of the world's leading designers, manufacturers and distributors
of orthopaedic devices and supplies. The Company's products include joint
reconstructive devices such as hip, knee and shoulder implants; spinal implants;
trauma devices; sports medicine products, including knee braces and other soft
good supplies; and various other orthopaedic and operating room products. The
Company sells and distributes its products in all major markets throughout the
world. During 1997, 51% of worldwide sales were to customers within the United
States, with the remaining 49% of total sales being to customers located
primarily in European and Asia/Pacific countries.
23
<PAGE>
On October 30, 1996, the Company issued 8.6 million new shares of common
stock, and its primary shareholder sold 7.0 million previously outstanding
shares to the public through an Initial Public Offering at an offering price of
$17.50 per share. The issuance of stock generated net proceeds to the Company
after expenses, discounts and commissions of approximately $139 million.
Prior to the public offering, the Company was operated as the orthopaedic
division of Corange. This division comprised various legal entities that were
engaged, or partly engaged, in the orthopaedic business and were owned by a
number of different entities within Corange. As a result of a pre-offering
reorganization, (i) the non-U.S. entities (or in certain cases, the assets
thereof) that were involved in the orthopaedic business were transferred into
the Company's U.S. consolidated group, (ii) Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, the
U.S. operating subsidiary of the Boehringer Mannheim companies, which were under
common control with the DePuy companies, was transferred outside the Company's
U.S. consolidated group and (iii) the Company was reincorporated in Delaware.
In April 1997, the Company acquired Landanger, a leading manufacturer of hip
implants located in France, for approximately $150 million. This acquisition
contributed approximately 7% additional sales growth for the year ended December
31, 1997. In addition, the Company sold its international healthcare and
pharmaceutical businesses resulting in a gain of $34.9 million. These
divestitures caused sales to decline by approximately 3% during 1997.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes selected financial information expressed as a
percentage of net sales and the change from year to year:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Percentage of Net Sales Percentage Change
------------------------------ ------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------
1997 1996
1997 1996 1995 vs. 1996 vs. 1995
----- ----- ------ --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 10% 10%
Cost of sales 29.7 30.0 31.4 10 4
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Gross profit 70.3 70.0 68.6 11 12
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Selling, general and administrative
expenses 38.5 38.2 36.2 11 16
Research and development expenses 3.7 3.1 3.4 31 2
Goodwill amortization 1.9 1.8 2.2 19 (13)
Special items, net 1.1 - - 100 -
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Operating income 25.1 26.9 26.8 3 10
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Interest expense .9 1.0 1.0 4 4
Other income, net 1.1 .6 .2 101 190
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Income before taxes, minority
interest expense and equity in
earnings of unconsolidated
affiliate 25.3 26.5 26.0 5 12
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Provision for income taxes 9.2 11.3 11.4 (10) 8
Minority interest expense .3 .2 .1 37 211
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliate .1 .3 .4 (39) (31)
----- ------ ------ --------- --------
Net income 15.9% 15.3% 14.9% 15% 12%
===== ====== ====== ========= ========
</TABLE>
24
<PAGE>
The following table summarizes sales by product line and geographic location:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
(in millions) 1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Reconstructive products $531.7 $470.2 $450.6
Spinal implants 61.8 45.5 30.6
Trauma products 61.7 56.4 49.4
Sports medicine 50.3 48.2 29.4
Other products 64.7 77.0 76.6
------- ------- -------
Total sales $770.2 $697.3 $636.6
------- ------- -------
U.S. sourced sales $425.5 $408.9 $377.3
International sourced sales 344.7 288.4 259.3
------- ------- -------
Total sales $770.2 $697.3 $636.6
------- ------- -------
Sales to customers located in the United States $394.6 $373.8 $349.9
Sales to customers located outside the United States 375.6 323.5 286.7
------- ------- -------
Total sales $770.2 $697.3 $636.6
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
Year Ended December 31, 1997 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1996
Net sales were a record $770.2 million for the year ended December 31,
1997, representing an increase of $72.9 million, or 10%, over the prior year.
The acquisitions of Landanger in April 1997 and Orthopedic Technology, Inc. (now
DePuy OrthoTech) in March 1996 contributed sales growth of 8%. Continued
penetration of the spinal implant market caused total sales to increase by 2%,
and an additional 5% sales growth resulted primarily from increased sales of
joint reconstructive products. These increases were partially offset by a 2%
decline in sales arising from the unfavorable effects of foreign exchange rates
in 1997 as compared with the prior year. In addition, the divestitures of the
healthcare and pharmaceutical businesses resulted in a decline in sales of 3%.
In summary, the components of the worldwide sales improvement were as
follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Acquisitions 8%
Volume and product mix 5%
Net pricing changes 2%
Effect of foreign exchange rates -2%
Divestitures -3%
</TABLE>
U.S. sourced sales to unaffiliated customers rose $16.6 million, or
approximately 4%, during the year ended December 31, 1997. This growth was
principally the result of increased sales of spinal and joint reconstructive
implants and sales acquired through the purchase of DePuy OrthoTech in March
1996.
International sourced sales to unaffiliated customers rose $56.3
million, or 20%, during the year ended December 31, 1997. This increase in sales
was primarily attributable to the acquisition of Landanger in April 1997
resulting in international sales growth of 17%. The continued expansion in the
European and Asia/Pacific regions also caused sales to grow by 8% and 5%,
respectively, exclusive of acquisitions, the effects of foreign exchange and
divestitures. The lower dollar translation of foreign currency sales due to
fluctuating foreign exchange rates partially offset the overall increase in
international sales by 6% and divestitures caused sales to decline by an
additional 7%.
25
<PAGE>
The Company's gross profit for the year ended December 31, 1997 was
$541.2 million, or 70.3% of sales, as compared to 70.0% of sales reported in the
prior year. During the second quarter of the year, certain one-time inventory
adjustments related to discontinued, obsolete and excess products were recorded
resulting in a 1% decrease in gross margin. This decrease was more than offset
by improved manufacturing efficiencies and greater leveraging of manufacturing
costs due to increased unit volume.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 1997 totaled $296.6
million, or 38.5% of sales, representing a marginal increase over the 38.2%
reported in the prior year. General and administrative expenses increased during
the year resulting from higher expenses attributable to the Landanger
acquisition and to increased legal and other professional fees related to
various litigation and regulatory matters. These higher general and
administrative expenses were partially offset by a reduction in selling expenses
during 1997, as compared to the prior year which had experienced high levels of
expense due to the conversion of the U.S. distribution structure from
independent sales agents to Company-managed territories.
Research and development expenses increased to $28.4 million, or 3.7% of
sales, during the year as compared to the 3.1% reported in the same period in
1996. This increase was partly due to the purchase of Landanger. The Company
continues to make investments in technological advancements in order to remain
competitive in the orthopaedic market and to provide its customers with the
latest technology available.
Goodwill amortization totaled $14.7 million in 1997, representing a $2.4
million increase compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily related
to the recording of additional goodwill for the acquisitions of Landanger in
April 1997 and DePuy OrthoTech in March 1996, partially offset by lower
amortization on the goodwill related to the healthcare and pharmaceutical
businesses which were sold during the first half of 1997.
Special items, net, reported during 1997 included an $8.0 million pretax
gain on the sale of the pharmaceutical business of DePuy International,
effective March 28, 1997, and a $26.9 million gain on the sale of the healthcare
business of DePuy International, effective May 29, 1997, described in Note 3 to
the financial statements. These gains were offset by special charges totaling
$43.4 million including:
. $8.9 million of costs incurred to reorganize the distribution channels of
the Company,
. a $17.4 million charge to recognize minimum obligations to former
distributors,
. a $7.9 million provision for impairment in value of assets primarily
related to foreign operations,
. a $5.2 million provision for integration and reorganization expenses
within existing DePuy entities as a consequence of the Landanger
acquisition and
. a $4.0 million provision for purchased research and development, as
described in Note 3 to the financial statements.
Interest expense was $7.1 million for the year, representing a $.3
million increase compared to the prior year. This higher interest expense was
largely due to additional debt acquired during the year related to the purchase
of Landanger, partially offset by a reduction in outstanding debt balances due
to the early payoff of an affiliate loan and to increased internal funding of
short-term financial requirements. This movement to internal financing occurred
in order to use the excess cash received from the sale of the healthcare and
pharmaceutical businesses during the first half of the year.
26
<PAGE>
Other income, net, totaled $8.7 million for the year representing a $4.4
million increase over the prior year. This higher income resulted from increased
interest income attributable to higher levels of invested cash and improved
interest rates on cash equivalents and short-term investments. The average cash
invested for the year increased as a result of the proceeds received from the
IPO in October 1996, resulting in investment earnings for a full year in 1997 as
compared to only two months in 1996.
The effective income tax rate for the year was 36.4% as compared to
42.5% reported in the prior year. The 6.1% reduction in the rate was mainly
attributable to the tax effects of the gain realized on the sale of the
healthcare and pharmaceutical businesses and the financing structure related to
the Landanger acquisition.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 1997 was $122.8 million, or
15.9% of sales, representing 15% growth over the prior year. This increase was
primarily attributable to an 11% increase in operating income, excluding all
unusual items such as the one-time inventory adjustments and the amounts
included in special items, net. Higher interest income and a lower effective
income tax rate also contributed to the growth in net income.
Year Ended December 31, 1996 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1995
Net sales were $697.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1996,
representing an increase of $60.7 million, or 10%, over the prior year.
Continued penetration of the spinal implant market caused total sales to
increase by 2%. The acquisition of DePuy OrthoTech in March 1996 resulted in
additional sales growth of 3%. The effects of foreign exchange rates in 1996
compared with 1995 resulted in an unfavorable impact on sales of 1%. The
remaining 6% increase related primarily to sales growth in international
markets, partially offset by the negative impact of lower average prices in the
United States, predominantly resulting from the managed care environment.
The components of the worldwide sales improvement were as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Acquisitions 3%
Volume and product mix 10%
Net pricing changes -2%
Effect of foreign exchange rates -1%
</TABLE>
U.S. sourced sales to unaffiliated customers rose $31.6 million, or
approximately 8%. This growth was primarily attributable to the acquisition of
DePuy OrthoTech in March 1996 and to increased sales of spinal and shoulder
implants.
International sourced sales to unaffiliated customers rose $29.1
million, or 11%. This increase in sales was related to continued expansion in
the European, Asia/Pacific and South American regions. Expansion in these areas
caused sales to grow by 12%, 11% and 7%, respectively, during the year ended
December 31, 1996.
The Company's gross profit for the year ended December 31, 1996 was
$488.3 million, or 70.0% of sales, as compared to 68.6% of sales for the prior
year. This margin improvement resulted from various manufacturing efficiencies
obtained through cost controls and higher unit sales, the consolidated impact of
which more than offset the negative impact of lower average prices realized in
the United States.
27
<PAGE>
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $266.8 million for
1996, or 38.2% of sales, as compared to 36.2% in the preceding year. The primary
reason for this increase as a percent of sales was the cost associated with
converting approximately 75% of the Company's U.S. distribution structure from
independent sales agents to Company-managed territories under the responsibility
of territory sales managers. As part of this conversion, the Company incurred
additional (in certain cases, one-time) costs totaling $16.2 million, primarily
related to new surgical instrumentation and additional administration expenses
incurred to set up the new territory offices. In addition to these costs, the
Company continued to invest in the development of the U.S. sales infrastructure
and in the expansion of its business in the spinal and international markets.
Research and development expenses of $21.7 million represented a slight
increase over the $21.3 million expense reported in 1995.
Goodwill amortization totaled $12.3 million during 1996, representing a
$1.9 million decrease compared to the prior year. This decrease was primarily
related to the fact that certain goodwill assets became fully amortized during
1995, partially offset by additional goodwill recorded during 1996 related to
the acquisition of DePuy OrthoTech in March 1996.
The Company reported a 10% increase in operating income to $187.5
million, or 26.9% of sales, for the year 1996, as compared to $170.3 million for
1995, or 26.8% of sales. This increase was primarily attributable to improved
gross margins, offset by additional expenses incurred in selling, general and
administrative expenses.
Interest expense was $6.8 million during 1996, representing a $.3
million increase over the interest expense incurred in the prior year. This
higher expense primarily resulted from slightly higher interest rates.
Other income, net, totaled $4.3 million for 1996 as compared to $1.5
million reported in the prior year, representing an increase of $2.8 million.
This increase mainly resulted from higher interest income, primarily
attributable to income earned on the invested proceeds received from the public
offering.
The effective income tax rate for 1996 was 42.5% as compared to 44.0%
recorded in the prior year. The 1.5% decrease in the rate is primarily
attributable to the reduction in nondeductible goodwill expense.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 1996 was $106.7 million, or
15.3% of sales, representing a 12% increase over the prior year. This increase
was primarily the result of a 10% increase in operating income, higher interest
income and a lower effective income tax rate.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Prior to the reorganization previously described, the Company's cash
flow in the United States was pooled with that of Corange's other U.S.
operations. Effective with the Company becoming a public company, all cash
generated is maintained in its own accounts and is available for use by the
Company. In addition to the net proceeds received from the IPO effective October
30, 1996, cash generated from operations is the principal source of funding
available and provides adequate liquidity to meet the Company's operational
needs. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $215.6 million at December 31, 1997,
compared with $209.4 million at December 31, 1996.
28
<PAGE>
Net proceeds received from the public offering in October 1996 totaled
$138.6 million. A portion of this cash was used to fund part of the cost of the
Landanger acquisition. The remaining cash is currently invested primarily in
cash equivalents and will be used to finance the continued expansion of the
Company's business, provided suitable acquisitions can be identified and
negotiated.
Working capital at December 31, 1997 was $403.2 million, representing a
$34.1 million increase from December 31, 1996. The annualized inventory turnover
ratio for the year ended December 31, 1997 was 1.4, decreasing slightly compared
with the rate of 1.6 experienced during the prior year. The annualized accounts
receivable turnover rate was 6.0 for the current year increasing slightly over
the 5.8 reported in the prior year.
Operating activities generated $138.2 million of cash during 1997 as
compared to $99.0 million provided in the prior year. The $39.2 million increase
resulted primarily from higher net income and significant improvements in
working capital requirements. In addition, the special items discussed in Note 3
to the financial statements affected several line items on the consolidated
statements of cash flows, such as noncurrent liabilities and gain on sale of
assets.
Cash flows used for investing activities totaled $130.3 million for the
year 1997 including $150.4 million paid in consideration for acquisitions (net
of cash acquired), capital expenditures of $25.0 million and net purchases of
short-term investments of $.4 million, partially offset by proceeds received
from the sale of the healthcare and pharmaceutical businesses of DePuy
International of $45.5 million. Cash flows used for investing activities in 1996
totaled $84.4 million for the year and was comprised of $54.9 million paid for
various acquisitions, capital expenditures of $24.9 million and $4.6 million of
investments in short-term securities. The consideration paid for business
acquisitions in 1996 (net of cash acquired) was comprised of $45.9 million paid
for the acquisition of DePuy OrthoTech and $9.0 million of payments related to
other various acquisitions, including deferred payments for DePuy ACE and CMW
Laboratories, both purchased in 1994.
Cash flows used for financing activities were $1.8 million in 1997 and
included a net decrease in debt of $3.3 million and $1.5 million of proceeds
received primarily from the issuance of stock through the employee stock
purchase plan and the exercise of stock options. The decrease in debt was
largely due to a reduction in debt to affiliates, partially offset by the
partial financing of the Landanger acquisition. Cash flows provided by financing
activities for the year 1996 were $147.2 million and included $138.6 million of
net proceeds received from the issuance of stock sold as part of the IPO, $44.1
million of advances received from CUSHI, an affiliate, as part of the
centralized cash management system previously described (funds used for the
DePuy OrthoTech acquisition) and $4.5 million of capital contributions received
from affiliates, partially offset by a net decrease in debt of $31.4 million and
dividends of $8.6 million paid to an affiliate.
The Company declared an initial annual cash dividend of $.12 per share
in October 1997, which was paid in January 1998, and anticipates that it will
pay dividends annually, provided that funds are legally available therefore and
subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. Capital expenditures are
expected to be approximately $37 million in 1998, primarily consisting of
purchases of machinery and equipment and accounting software. In addition to
these funding requirements, the Company expects to continue to evaluate
potential acquisitions to expand its business.
The Company has historically been able to fund its capital and operating
needs through its cash flows from operations and expects to be able to continue
to do so in the future. The Company believes that with
29
<PAGE>
its current cash position and its ability to obtain additional cash, either
through the issuance of additional shares of common stock or utilization of
credit lines, it has the ability to fund future acquisitions.
Subsequent Events:
On March 20, 1998, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase the
equity of AcroMed Corporation in a transaction valued at approximately $325
million. The purchase agreement is subject to certain conditions, including
receipt of necessary regulatory approvals. The Company has obtained a commitment
letter for a $300 million revolving line of credit to fund this acquisition.
AcroMed, headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, manufacturers and distributes spinal
implant medical devices to treat a range of conditions including degenerative
diseases, deformities, traumas/tumors and cervical applications. For the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1997, AcroMed reported net sales of approximately $90
million.
In March 1998, employees of DePuy, Inc. received special monetary awards
in recognition of their services to the Corange Group of companies as a result
of its sale to Roche Holdings Ltd. ("Roche"). The awards to DePuy personnel had
no cash impact on the Company because they were funded through a $17.5 million
capital contribution from Corange to DePuy. However, accounting rules will
require DePuy to record an approximate $24.5 million pretax operating expense
related to the awards during the first quarter of 1998. The expense will be
identified on a separate line of the DePuy income statement as a one-time, non-
recurring charge. The estimated impact of the charge on earnings per share in
the first quarter of 1998 will be $.18.
FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PERFORMANCE
Although management believes that the Company will continue to be a
world leader in the orthopaedic industry with strong financial performance,
there are many risks and uncertainties which may change this outlook and affect
the Company's performance over the next several years. The following discussion
points out certain items which may affect DePuy and summarizes management's
expectations regarding these issues. The Company cannot guarantee that these
expectations will be realized, nor can it predict what future affect these items
will have on its performance. Other risk factors may also exist which have not
been identified either in this discussion or elsewhere in the Company's Form 10-
K.
The orthopaedic industry within the United States has been greatly
influenced by the effects of healthcare reform and the advent of managed care.
The enforcement of strict cost controls and the market trends toward discounted
prices have affected all competitors in the orthopaedic industry. The Company
has experienced a gradual leveling of prices over the last year and believes
that this may continue. Although the Company does not anticipate that these
pricing issues will emerge again in the near future, there can be no guarantee
of such market trends.
The advent of managed care and the related pressures on cost containment
have also resulted in increased involvement in the purchasing decisions by
hospital buying groups and higher numbers of national purchasing contracts.
These contracts require manufacturers to provide significant price discounts on
their products in return for preferred supplier arrangements. The Company
believes that the high levels of product sales to such groups and the
opportunity for increased market share can offset the financial impact of
discounting products. However, the extent to which buying groups are able to
obtain compliance from the various institutions within their organizations, as
anticipated under such preferred supplier agreements, varies considerably
depending on the particular buying group. The Company has recently experienced
30
<PAGE>
a lower rate of compliance in the U.S. under certain contracts, such as the
agreement with Columbia/HCA. If these contracts do not produce higher levels of
compliance in the future, the sales growth and the financial results of the
Company may be adversely impacted.
A significant portion of the Company's business is performed outside the
United States, primarily in Europe and Asia/Pacific countries, where sales and
other transactions are denominated in foreign currencies. Based upon the recent
volatility in the foreign currency markets, currency rate fluctuations could
have a negative impact on future sales and earnings growth. The Company
occasionally hedges certain foreign currency transactions where it is deemed
prudent in an effort to protect its profit levels. However, there is no
guarantee that such hedges can be obtained or that they will protect the Company
from future losses resulting from foreign currency fluctuations.
The orthopaedic industry is highly competitive and is characterized by
innovation, technological change and advancement. The Company currently competes
with a number of companies and can provide no assurance that its competitors
will not succeed in developing technologies and products that are more effective
than the Company's or that would render the Company's technology or products
obsolete or uncompetitive.
The Company's sales growth and continued success in the U.S. depends
largely upon marketing arrangements with independent sales associates, who are
managed by a Company employee or by an independent agent. The sales associates'
sales and service expertise and relationships with the customers in the
marketplace are critical to the continued success of the Company and its ability
to maintain market share. Due to the extreme competitiveness in the orthopaedic
market, there can be no guarantee that the Company will be able to retain the
associates currently marketing its products or will be able to attract new
associates to grow the business. If the Company is unable to maintain the
relationships currently existing with its sales representatives and associates,
this could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business and results
of operations.
The Company holds U.S. and foreign patents and regularly applies for new
patents related to certain systems, components and instrumentation for its
products. Recently the medical device industry has experienced extensive
litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. There can
be no assurance as to the protection provided by these patents nor that the
Company will not become subject to patent infringement claims or litigation in
the future to determine the priority of inventions. If such claims result in
lawsuits, the Company may incur substantial legal expenses which may affect its
financial performance. In addition, the Company holds licenses from third
parties to utilize certain patents and technology applied to the design of some
of its devices. The loss of such licenses would prevent the Company from
manufacturing and selling certain products, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business.
The Company's products are subject to extensive regulation in the United
States by the FDA and, in some jurisdictions, by state authorities. There can be
no assurance that the FDA will act favorably or quickly in its review of the
Company's regulatory filings or that significant difficulties and costs will not
be encountered by the Company in its efforts to obtain necessary FDA clearance
on its products. In addition, the FDA may require the Company to conduct
additional product testing or perform more clinical studies. The FDA may also
place significant limitations upon the intended use of the Company's products as
a condition to clearance. These additional requirements or restrictions may have
an impact on the Company's ability to manufacture and sell certain products
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial results.
31
<PAGE>
The Company recognizes the need to ensure its operations will not be
adversely impacted by Year 2000 software issues. Major areas of potential
business impact have been identified and remedial actions are being considered.
Based upon current assessments, the Company believes that future financial
results will not be materially affected by Year 2000 issues. Most of these
issues will be resolved through the purchase of new software systems which will
be capitalized and depreciated over the life of such systems. There will be
certain costs incurred related to the modification of existing software, but
these costs are estimated to be immaterial to the financial results of the
Company. However, there can be no guarantee that the Company's current
assessment will be achieved. Actual results could differ materially from such
assessments.
The recent acquisition of DePuy's parent company by Roche, as described
in Note 17 to the financial statements, may have an impact on future growth
strategies and operations of the Company dependent upon the guidance provided by
the new majority owner. Presently, the Company is operating as a separate
division of Roche under the current management team. Although the Company cannot
predict the effect that this acquisition may have on its future performance, it
believes that it will be permitted to continue its growth and success under the
guidance of another world leader in healthcare.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share data) 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $770,188 $697,273 $636,561
Cost of sales 229,028 208,976 200,139
-------- -------- --------
Gross profit 541,160 488,297 436,422
-------- -------- --------
Selling, general and administrative expenses 296,572 266,776 230,578
Research and development expenses 28,419 21,693 21,320
Goodwill amortization 14,680 12,325 14,201
Special items, net 8,459 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Operating income 193,030 187,503 170,323
-------- -------- --------
Interest expense, affiliate 1,172 4,869 4,479
Interest expense, other 5,919 1,942 2,061
Other income, net 8,716 4,330 1,493
-------- -------- --------
Income before taxes, minority interest expense and
equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate 194,655 185,022 165,276
-------- -------- --------
Provision for income taxes 70,937 78,689 72,707
Minority interest expense 2,125 1,553 499
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate 1,193 1,968 2,859
-------- -------- --------
Net income $122,786 $106,748 $ 94,929
-------- -------- --------
Unaudited pro forma for 1996 and 1995:
Basic and diluted earnings per share $1.25 $1.17 $1.05
Weighted-average number of common shares 98,603 91,430 90,000
======== ======== ========
outstanding
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
32
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
--------------------------
(in thousands, except share data) 1997 1996
----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 215,567 $209,387
Short-term investments 4,925 4,640
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $17,722 (1997) and $8,534 (1996) 132,204 126,465
Inventories at lower of cost or market 169,735 151,406
Deferred income taxes 52,839 29,366
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 30,136 25,455
----------- ---------
Total current assets 605,406 546,719
----------- ---------
Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $74,570 (1997) and $78,373 (1996) 341,710 238,233
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $3,820 (1997) and 3,528 1,894
$698 (1996)
Deferred income taxes 15,584 7,932
Investment in affiliate 1,610 2,648
Other assets 8,865 10,934
----------- ---------
371,297 261,641
Property, plant and equipment, net 103,954 89,601
----------- ---------
Total assets $1,080,657 $897,961
=========== =========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt payable to affiliates $ 1,497 $ 30,295
Short-term debt 23,696 31,413
Accounts payable 36,296 30,515
Dividends payable to shareholders 11,836 --
Amounts payable to affiliates, net 493 709
Income taxes payable 33,696 17,384
Accrued royalties 23,115 18,580
Accrued employee compensation 23,005 18,237
Other accrued expenses 48,532 30,468
----------- ---------
Total current liabilities 202,166 177,601
----------- ---------
Noncurrent Liabilities
Long-term debt payable to affiliate -- 15,413
Long-term debt 68,189 4,754
Long-term employee benefits 20,097 17,141
Noncurrent deferred income taxes 8,243 8,509
Other noncurrent liabilities 14,458 401
----------- ---------
Total noncurrent liabilities 110,987 46,218
----------- ---------
Contingencies (Note 9)
Minority Interest 5,386 3,514
----------- ---------
Shareholders' Equity
Common stock, $.01 par value, 130,000,000 shares authorized,
shares outstanding of 98,679,874 (1997) and 98,580,000 (1996) 987 986
Additional paid-in capital 676,649 675,144
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Retained earnings 128,058 17,108
Net unrealized appreciation on securities 579 360
Minimum pension liability adjustment (74) (236)
Cumulative translation adjustment (44,081) (22,734)
---------- --------
Total shareholders' equity 762,118 670,628
---------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $1,080,657 $897,961
========== ========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
34
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
(in thousands) 1997 1996 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income $ 122,786 $106,748 $ 94,929
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 32,733 28,378 26,635
Gain on sale of assets (32,122) --- ---
Deferred income taxes (21,022) (2,717) (5,668)
Other, net 1,956 (2,123) 843
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions
and divestitures:
Accounts receivable 6,553 (8,510) (11,474)
Inventories (9,149) (32,037) 3,052
Amounts payable to / or receivable from affiliates, net 3,920 28,330 (28,215)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,246) (7,291) (2,090)
Other noncurrent assets 2,615 (811) (3,553)
Accounts payable (311) 3,139 45
Accrued employee compensation and other 8,039 7,907 2,348
Other noncurrent liabilities 11,094 (3,805) 4,940
Income taxes payable 12,360 (18,237) 8,554
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 138,206 98,971 90,346
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures (25,052) (24,882) (15,598)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired (150,390) (54,889) (17,500)
Purchases of short-term investments, net (357) (4,640) ---
Proceeds from sale of assets 45,517 --- ---
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used for investing activities (130,282) (84,411) (33,098)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Payments of short-term debt (67,547) (33,232) (6,550)
Proceeds from issuance of short-term debt 25,940 31,140 38,378
Payments of long-term debt (29,807) (29,860) (1,027)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 68,109 534 487
Advances from (to) affiliate --- 44,063 (76,558)
Net proceeds from issuance of stock 1,505 138,563 ---
Capital contributions from affiliates --- 4,564 4,000
Dividends paid to affiliate --- (8,553) (1,868)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities (1,800) 147,219 (43,138)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 56 699 668
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 6,180 162,478 14,778
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 209,387 46,909 32,131
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 215,567 $209,387 $ 46,909
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
35
<PAGE>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net
Shareholder's Additional Unrealized
Net Common Common Paid- Retained Appreciation
(in thousands) Investment Shares Stock in Capital Earnings on Securities
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994 $ 357,050 --- $--- $--- $--- $---
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the year 94,929
Dividend to affiliate (1,868)
Change in net transfers (76,526)
to affiliate
Foreign currency translation
adjustments 333
Minimum pension liability
adjustment 181
Capital contributions
from affiliate 4,000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 378,099 --- --- --- --- ---
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the period 89,640
Dividends to affiliate (8,553)
Change in net transfers 44,063
to affiliate
Foreign currency translation
adjustments 4,727
Unrealized gain on securities 44
Capital contributions from
affiliates 4,564
Capitalization resulting from
reorganization and initial
public offering (512,584) 98,580 986 675,144 --- 44
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 30, 1996,
EFFECTIVE DATE OF INITIAL
PUBLIC OFFERING --- 98,580 986 675,144 --- 44
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the period 17,108
Foreign currency
translation adjustments
Minimum pension liability
adjustment
Unrealized gain on securities 316
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 --- 98,580 986 675,144 17,108 360
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the year 122,786
Cash dividends declared (11,836)
Exercise of stock options and
issuance of other stock awards 13 525
Common stock issued for
purchase under the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan 87 1 1,553
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
Minimum pension liability
adjustment
Unrealized gain on securities 219
Other (573)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 $--- 98,680 $987 $676,649 $128,058 $579
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<CAPTION>
Minimum
Pension Cumulative
Liability Translation
(in thousands) Adjustment Adjustment
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1994 $--- $---
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the year
Dividend to affiliate
Change in net transfers
to affiliate
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
Minimum pension liability
adjustment
Capital contributions
from affiliate
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 --- ---
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the period
Dividends to affiliate
Change in net transfers
to affiliate
Foreign currency translation
adjustments
Unrealized gain on securities
Capital contributions from
affiliates
Capitalization resulting from
reorganization and initial
public offering (24) (25,003)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT OCTOBER 30, 1996,
EFFECTIVE DATE OF INITIAL
PUBLIC OFFERING (24) (25,003)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the period
Foreign currency
translation adjustments 2,269
Minimum pension liability
adjustment (212)
Unrealized gain on securities
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 (236) (22,734)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income for the year
Cash dividends declared
Exercise of stock options and
issuance of other stock awards
Common stock issued for
purchase under the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
Foreign currency translation
adjustments (21,347)
Minimum pension liability
adjustment 162
Unrealized gain on securities
Other
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 $ (74) $(44,081)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
36
<PAGE>
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION/ACQUISITIONS
DePuy, Inc. (the "Company") was formed as the result of a worldwide
reorganization completed by its parent, Corange Limited ("Corange"), to realign
its worldwide orthopaedic operations into a stand-alone entity in order to sell
shares of the realigned entity to the public through an Initial Public Offering
("IPO"). Prior to the public offering, various actions were taken to form the
Company including (i) the consolidation of the worldwide operations of DePuy
under Corange U.S. Holdings, Inc., an Indiana corporation ("CUSHI"), (ii) the
transfer of Boehringer Mannheim Corporation ("BMC") out of the CUSHI
consolidated group and (iii) the merging of CUSHI downstream into DePuy, Inc.,
which was created on July 26, 1996 for purposes of becoming the holding company
for the DePuy worldwide operations, with DePuy, Inc. as the surviving company in
the merger, the effect of which was to reincorporate CUSHI in Delaware under the
name "DePuy, Inc." None of these actions involved outside minority shareholders.
Accordingly, the consolidation of the entities was accounted for on a
predecessor basis.
Pursuant to a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that became effective on October 30, 1996, the Company issued,
through an Initial Public Offering, 7,780,000 shares of its common stock at
$17.50 per share which generated net proceeds after expenses, discounts and
commissions of approximately $126,000. In November 1996, an additional 800,000
shares were sold pursuant to an underwriter's over allotment provision
generating net proceeds of approximately $13,000. The Company used a portion of
the net proceeds from the sale of shares of its common stock to fund part of the
cost of the Landanger-Camus ("Landanger") acquisition in April 1997 and plans to
use the remaining proceeds to finance additional expansion of the Company's
business, provided suitable acquisitions can be identified and negotiated.
The Company's primary business is the development, manufacture and sale of
orthopaedic joint implants (primarily hips, knees and shoulders), spinal
implants, related surgical instruments, trauma products and sports medicine soft
goods.
On March 11, 1996, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of common
stock of Orthopedic Technology, Inc. ("DePuy OrthoTech"), a manufacturer of
orthopaedic products, primarily for the sports medicine market, in consideration
of $46,300 in cash. For the year ended September 30, 1995, DePuy OrthoTech
reported net sales of $18,400 and net income of $600 (unaudited). The purchase
method of accounting was applied to this acquisition and a total of $41,551 was
allocated to goodwill. The acquisition was funded by available internal
resources. The operating results of DePuy OrthoTech have been included in the
consolidated statements of income from the date of acquisition and are not
material to consolidated net sales or consolidated net income.
On April 2, 1997, the Company purchased 89.6% of the shares of Landanger, or
1,939,452 shares, which were held by members of the Landanger family and certain
minority shareholders. The purchase was followed by a tender offer whereby the
Company acquired the remaining 10.4% of the shares, which were owned by the
public. The total purchase price, including acquisition costs, approximated
$150,000. Goodwill totaling $123,489 was recorded as a result of this
acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. The acquisition was funded
partly through external financing and partly with cash received
37
<PAGE>
from the IPO. Landanger, headquartered in France, is a manufacturer of hip
implants and a distributor of orthopaedic devices and supplies. For the year
ended August 31, 1996, Landanger reported sales of $99,500 and net income of
$8,000 (unaudited and translated at the average exchange rate for the fiscal
year).
The operating results of Landanger have been included in the consolidated
statements of income from the date of acquisition. On the basis of a pro forma
consolidation of the results of operations (unaudited), as if the acquisition
had taken place at the beginning of 1996, consolidated net sales would have been
$792,938 for the year ended December 31, 1997 and $788,064 for the same period
in 1996 (translated at the average exchange rate for 1997 and 1996,
respectively). Consolidated pro forma net income and earnings per share would
not have been materially different from the reported amounts for the years 1997
and 1996.
These unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations have been prepared
for comparative purposes only and include certain adjustments, such as
additional amortization expense as a result of goodwill, an adjustment for
discontinued businesses and increased interest expense on acquisition debt. In
management's opinion, the pro forma consolidated results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the
acquisition been consummated on January 1, 1996 or of future operations of the
combined companies under the ownership and operation of the Company.
NOTE 2 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries as defined in Note 1. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates that are between 20% and 50% owned and
where control does not exist are carried at cost plus equity in undistributed
earnings since acquisition. For periods prior to the reorganization as described
in Note 1, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the
historical accounting records of the consolidated affiliates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION Revenues from product sales are recognized at the time of
shipment to the customer.
INCOME TAXES Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("FAS
109") and have been computed on a separate company basis. The current provision
for income taxes is computed on the pretax income of the consolidated entities
located within each taxing country based upon the tax law in effect during the
respective period. Deferred income taxes result from the future tax consequences
associated with temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and the reported amounts of those assets and liabilities for
financial accounting purposes. Incremental U.S. income taxes have not been
provided on the cumulative undistributed earnings of the foreign subsidiaries
totaling $99,833 as of December 31, 1997. These earnings, which reflect full
provision for non-U.S. income taxes, are expected to be reinvested indefinitely
in non-U.S. operations or to be remitted substantially free of additional tax
due to the availability of foreign tax credits.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation" ("FAS 123"). FAS 123 encourages, but does not
require, companies to record compensation cost for
38
<PAGE>
stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to
account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed
in Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation
cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market
price of the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the amount that must
be paid to acquire the stock. The pro forma effects of adoption are disclosed
in Note 10.
OTHER INCOME, NET Other income, net, for the years ended December 31 was
comprised of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------- ------ --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Interest income $9,053 $4,261 $ 3,152
Other (expense) income (337) 69 (1,659)
------- ------ --------
Other income, net $8,716 $4,330 $ 1,493
======= ====== ========
</TABLE>
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCY Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries,
other than those located in highly inflationary countries, are translated to
U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date;
revenues and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates throughout
the period. For operations in countries treated as highly inflationary, certain
financial statement amounts are translated at historical exchange rates, with
all other assets and liabilities translated at year-end exchange rates.
Translation gains and losses are included in shareholders' equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses and the translation effects of financial
statements of subsidiaries in highly inflationary countries are included in
other income, net, and are not material to the results of operations.
CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
INVENTORIES Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost
being determined under the first-in, first-out method. At December 31,
inventories consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Finished products $136,170 $122,035
Work in process 13,387 10,392
Raw materials 20,178 18,979
-------- --------
Inventories at lower of cost or market $169,735 $151,406
======== ========
</TABLE>
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS The Company's acquisitions have generated
goodwill representing the purchase cost in excess of the fair value of the net
assets acquired. The Company deter mines the initial amortization period for
goodwill based upon an evaluation of criteria which would be indicators of
future success of the businesses acquired. Such criteria include, but are not
limited to, past and expected profitability and cash flows, customer base,
existing and new product offerings, and key contractual relationships. Based
upon the evaluations, the Company amortizes goodwill on a straight-line basis
over the periods of expected benefit which range from 5 to 30 years, the
majority of which is over a period of 30 years. Other intangible assets are
amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from
39
<PAGE>
one to three years. The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets
including goodwill and other intangible assets whenever adverse events or
changes in circumstances or business climate indicate that an impairment may
have occurred. If the future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest)
expected to result from the use of the related assets are less than the carrying
value of such assets, an impairment has been incurred and a loss is recognized
to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets, including goodwill, based
on the expected discounted cash flows or market prices. Expected cash flows are
discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment are reported at
cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets which generally range from 10 to 40 years for
buildings and improvements and from 3 to 10 years for machinery and equipment.
Amounts expended for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Upon disposition, any related gain or loss is credited or charged to other
income, net. Depreciation expense of approximately $17,500, $15,800, and $12,400
was recorded in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. At December 31, property,
plant and equipment consisted of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Land $ 3,723 $ 2,035
Buildings and improvements 53,395 43,729
Machinery and equipment 144,697 130,582
--------- ---------
201,815 176,346
Less allowance for depreciation (97,861) (86,745)
--------- ---------
Total property, plant and equipment, net $103,954 $ 89,601
========= =========
</TABLE>
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of" ("FAS 121") in 1996. The adoption of FAS 121 did not have a
material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
SHAREHOLDER'S NET INVESTMENT Prior to the reorganization, the Company
participated in a centralized cash management system for all of its U.S.
operations through an affiliate. Substantially all cash receipts and
disbursements were processed through CUSHI and the Company was charged or
credited for the net of cash receipts, cash disbursements and other CUSHI
allocated charges each month. The net effect of this monthly activity was
charged or credited to shareholder's net investment.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK The Company enters into
forward exchange contracts where it is considered prudent to manage its exposure
to fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates related to certain foreign
currency commitments, foreign currency denominated balance sheet positions and
anticipated foreign currency denominated expenditures. The Company does not
enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. Gains and
losses related to qualified accounting hedges are deferred and recognized in
income when the hedged transaction occurs.
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade accounts receivable.
The risk is limited due to the large number and types of entities comprising the
Company's customer base and their dispersion across many geographic regions. At
December 31, 1997, the Company had no significant concentrations of credit risk.
40
<PAGE>
ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
EARNINGS PER SHARE The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("FAS 128") in 1997. This Statement
specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings
per share for entities with publicly held common stock or potential common
stock. The calculation of basic earnings per share is performed by dividing net
income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
year. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus the
incremental shares that would have been outstanding upon the assumed exercise of
dilutive stock options. The effect of these incremental shares on the
calculation of earnings per share was not material for 1997, 1996 and 1995. The
adoption of FAS 128 did not have a material impact on the Company's reported
earnings per share data.
Prior to the reorganization described in Note 1, the Company was not a legal
entity and did not have a separately identifiable pool of capital. Accordingly,
historical per share data has been omitted from the consolidated financial
statements. Pro forma net income per share for 1996 is based on historical net
income and pro forma weighted-average common shares outstanding giving effect to
the common shares outstanding after the reorganization and the additional shares
and common stock equivalents issued through, or in connection with, the Initial
Public Offering. Pro forma net income per share for 1995 was based on historical
net income and the number of shares of common stock which were outstanding after
the reorganization.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 129, "Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure" in 1997.
This Statement establishes standards for disclosing information about an
entity's capital structure. The Company provides the required disclosures as
prescribed in this pronouncement in its annual financial statements for 1997.
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" ("FAS
130") and No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information" ("FAS 131"). These Statements establish standards for reporting
and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-
purpose financial statements and establish standards for the way that public
business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual
financial statements, respectively. Both of these pronouncements become
effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1997 and are also required for interim financial reporting. FAS 131 is not
required for interim financial reporting in the initial year of adoption. The
Company intends to provide the required disclosures as prescribed in these
pronouncements in its financial statements for 1998, which will require adoption
of FAS 130 in the first quarter of 1998 and FAS 131 in the Company's 1998 annual
financial statements.
RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain reclassifications have been made for prior years
presented in the financial statements to conform to the classifications adopted
in 1997.
41
<PAGE>
NOTE 3 - SPECIAL ITEMS
Effective March 28, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the
pharmaceutical business of DePuy International Ltd. The pharmaceutical and
related businesses achieved 1996 sales of approximately $14,000, principally
from infection control and skin treatment products sold to hospitals in the
United Kingdom. The transaction was completed through a management buy-out and
resulted in a one-time, pretax gain of $8,000. In addition, the Company
recognized special charges totaling $8,900 during the first quarter of 1997,
primarily related to the cost of instrumentation sets acquired and written off
in connection with reorganizing various distribution channels to increase
implant sales.
Effective May 29, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the
healthcare business of DePuy International Ltd. The healthcare and related
businesses achieved 1996 sales of approximately $17,000 principally from
incontinence care products sold to hospitals in the United Kingdom. The
transaction resulted in a one-time gain of $26,900. In addition, the Company
recognized special charges totaling $34,500 during the second quarter of 1997,
consisting of a $17,400 charge to recognize minimum obligations to former
distributors, a $7,900 provision for the impairment in value of assets primarily
related to foreign operations, a $5,200 provision for integration and
reorganization expenses within existing DePuy entities as a consequence of the
Landanger acquisition and a $4,000 provision for purchased research and
development.
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATE
The Company has a 50% investment interest in a joint venture with E.I. DuPont de
Nemours and Company for the purpose of sharing in the production and sale of
advanced technologies, primarily in North American countries. The Company
received pretax distributions of $2,436, $3,538 and $5,264 from this venture
in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. This investment is reported using the
equity method as described in Note 2.
NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company recorded amounts payable to affiliates, net, of $493 and $709 at
December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively. These balances represent advances
between affiliated companies for transactions incurred in the normal course of
business. Additional related party transactions are disclosed concerning income
taxes, affiliate debt, employee benefit plans and forward exchange contracts in
Notes 2, 6, 7, 12, 14 and 15.
The consolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows of the Company as a component of Corange and
may not be indicative of actual results of the Company under other ownership.
Management believes that the consolidated statements of income include a
reasonable allocation of administrative expenses incurred by CUSHI on behalf of
the Company prior to its reorganization as described in Note 1. The allocations
of administrative expenses were based upon actual time and expenses incurred
totaling $674 and $779 in 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The Company is insured for product liability through an affiliated captive
insurance company, Bellago Insurance Limited of Hamilton Bermuda ("Bellago"),
for $2,000 per occurrence, $5,000 per group of related claims and $10,000 in the
aggregate. Excess claims are insured through commercial carriers.
42
<PAGE>
Insurance premiums of $2,100, $2,100 and $1,900 were paid to Bellago in 1997,
1996 and 1995, respectively.
In 1992, the Company entered into an oral arrangement with BMC to fund research
in the area of orthobiologics. Total expenses incurred related to this
arrangement were $797, $707 and $638 for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995, respectively.
NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of FAS
109. This standard requires, among other things, recognition of future tax
expense or benefits, measured by enacted tax rates attributable to temporary
differences between financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and
liabilities, and net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that
realization of such benefits is more likely than not.
Prior to the reorganization described in Note 1, the Company's domestic
operations were members of a U.S. group filing a consolidated federal
corporation income tax return with other affiliated companies. The group had no
tax sharing or allocation agreement and taxes were allocated on a separate
company basis. The Company had entered into a tax indemnity agreement with
Corange that limited the Company's liability for taxes to those arising out of
the Company's operations. Prior to the reorganization, CUSHI had been
responsible for remitting all federal and state income tax payments for all
members of the group. Therefore, while the Company had not actually made
payments of federal or state taxes prior to the reorganization referred to in
Note 1, it was assumed that the Company paid 90% of its current federal and
state provision during the year and the remaining 10% prior to the filing of its
U.S. tax returns in the subsequent year. Total income taxes paid, including
actual and assumed payments, were $80,164, $78,855, and $71,852 in 1997, 1996
and 1995, respectively.
Earnings from operations before income taxes, minority interest expense and
equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States $116,294 $139,392 $124,443
International 78,361 45,630 40,833
------------ ------------ -----------
Total $194,655 $185,022 $165,276
============ ============ ===========
</TABLE>
43
<PAGE>
The provision for income taxes is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal $ 52,994 $ 48,507 $ 48,303
International 24,759 22,535 21,647
State 11,186 10,364 8,425
-------------- -------------- ---------------
88,939 81,406 78,375
-------------- -------------- ---------------
Deferred:
Federal (10,488) (4,170) (3,658)
International (6,043) 1,644 (1,497)
State (1,471) (191) (513)
-------------- -------------- ---------------
(18,002) (2,717) (5,668)
-------------- -------------- ---------------
Total provision for income taxes $ 70,937 $ 78,689 $ 72,707
============== ============== ===============
</TABLE>
A reconciliation of the effective income tax rate follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
-------------- -------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States federal tax rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
Add (deduct):
Effect of international operations .4 2.4 2.4
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit 3.2 3.6 3.1
Impact of nondeductible goodwill 2.2 1.7 2.8
Gain on sale of Healthcare division (4.8) -- --
Other, net .4 (.2) .7
-------------- -------------- ---------------
Effective income tax rate 36.4% 42.5% 44.0%
============== ============== ===============
</TABLE>
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities are
comprised of the following at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
-------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory $ 9,502 $ 7,405
Profit in inventory 22,080 15,269
Royalties 2,380 2,224
Amortization other than goodwill 10,268 10,006
Deferred compensation 6,859 9,391
Net operating losses 11,886 2,108
Distributor termination costs 6,598 --
Other 11,662 5,084
Valuation allowances (2,932) (2,754)
-------------- ---------------
Net deferred tax assets $ 78,303 $ 48,733
============== ===============
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation $(14,141) $(18,601)
Other (3,982) (1,343)
-------------- ---------------
Net deferred tax liabilities $(18,123) $(19,944)
-------------- ---------------
</TABLE>
Net operating loss carryforwards which have been benefited total $9,300 at
December 31, 1997. These carryforwards are available to reduce future tax
liabilities of two foreign subsidiaries and expire in 2002.
44
<PAGE>
NOTE 7- LINES OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
At December 31, 1997, the Company had lines of credit with affiliated finance
companies totaling $1,497, of which $1,497 has been used. The Company also had
lines of credit with external banks amounting to $35,915, of which $8,737 has
been used. No compensating balances are required or maintained.
The Company has outstanding borrowings as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short-term debt:
<S> <C> <C>
Borrowings from affiliates, variable interest rates
ranging from 4.0% to 10.4%, weighted-average
interest rate of 5.0% (1997) and 6.3% (1996),
principal and interest due at various maturity dates $ 1,497 $30,295
Short-term bank debt-
6.37% interest rate, due 6/18/97 --- 11,590
Variable interest rates based upon MIBOR plus 15
basis points, due 12/20/97 --- 2,506
5.25% interest rate, due 3/27/97 --- 2,177
5.50% interest rate, due 7/15/98 8,071 ---
8.00% interest rate, due 12/31/98 5,469 348
Other bank debt, interest rates
ranging from 3.98% to 16.9%, weighted-average interest
rate of 8.0% (1997) and 7.7% (1996), principal and interest
due at various maturity dates 4,261 381
Acquisition related debt --- 10,000
Capitalized lease obligations 1,098 ---
Other debt, variable interest rates ranging from 6.5% to 8.25%,
principal and interest due at various maturity dates 4,797 4,411
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total short-term debt $25,193 $61,708
===========================================================================================================
Long-term debt:
Note payable to affiliate, interest rate varies quarterly based
upon LIBOR plus 37.5 basis points, due 11/22/99 $ --- $15,413
Note payable, 7.66%, due 12/30/98 --- 534
Note payable, 5.5%, due 12/31/04,
principal and interest payments due semi-annually 56,929 --
Capitalized lease obligations 6,046 --
Other debt, variable interest rates ranging from 6.5% to 8.25%,
principal and interest due at various maturity dates 5,214 4,220
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total long-term debt $68,189 $20,167
===========================================================================================================
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE>
At December 31, 1997, aggregate maturities of long-term debt, excluding capital
leases, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1999 $12,239
2000 9,719
2001 9,524
2002 9,746
2003 10,281
Thereafter 10,634
</TABLE>
Acquisition related debt outstanding at December 31, 1996 comprised a $10,000
contingency payment recorded in conjunction with the acquisition of ACE Medical
Company in March 1994. This payment was made during 1997.
Interest paid was $3,694, $5,116 and $4,276 for 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively, including $1,117, $4,553 and $3,638 paid to affiliates in 1997,
1996 and 1995, respectively.
During 1997 and 1996, $15,947 and $28,465, respectively, of long-term notes
payable were paid in advance of their maturity dates to utilize excess cash and
reduce future interest expense.
NOTE 8 - LEASES
The Company is a lessee under a number of cancelable and noncancelable operating
leases. Total rental expense was approximately $7,857, $5,804 and $4,153 for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. Future minimum
rental commitments under noncancelable leases are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Operating Capital
Year Ending December 31: Leases Leases
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
1998 $ 7,176 $1,707
1999 5,662 1,213
2000 4,459 1,182
2001 3,428 1,099
2002 2,913 945
Thereafter 9,689 2,845
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total minimum lease payments $33,327 $8,991
================================================================================
Less amount representing interest 1,847
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present value of net minimum lease payments 7,144
Less current portion of capital leases 1,098
--------
Long-term portion of capital leases $6,046
================================================================================
</TABLE>
46
<PAGE>
Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 1997 and 1996 included $8,926 and
$2,568, respectively, of equipment under leases that have been capitalized.
Accumulated depreciation for such equipment was $2,051 and $1,593 at December
31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
NOTE 9 - CONTINGENCIES
The Company is subject to a number of investigations, lawsuits and claims during
the normal course of business. Management does not expect that resulting
liabilities beyond provisions already recorded will have a materially adverse
effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. The loss provisions recorded have not been reduced for any
material amounts of anticipated insurance recoveries.
NOTE 10 - STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
In October 1996, the Company adopted the DePuy, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan
("Incentive Plan"). Under the lncentive Plan, the Company may grant nonqualified
or incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or
restricted stock units, performance awards, phantom stock units or other stock-
based awards for the benefit of selected executive personnel, key employees,
sales representatives, consultants of the Company and its affiliates, and non-
employee directors of the Company. During 1997, $305 was charged to earnings
related to stock options granted below market price to employees and to all
stock options granted to non-employees.
The Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of options to purchase up to an
aggregate of 9,485,069 shares of common stock. The maximum number of shares
available for restricted stock awards under the Incentive Plan is 350,000. As of
December 31, 1997, options to purchase approximately 7,151,500 shares are
available for issue. Subject to the provisions of the Incentive Plan, the term
of options awarded in 1996 and in 1997 is 10 years from the date of grant.
Effective with the Initial Public Offering, 1,249,250 stock options were awarded
with an exercise price of $17.50. Options which have been granted pursuant to
the Incentive Plan vest over a three year period from the date of grant. In
addition, 85,069 phantom stock units were granted to key personnel, which
entitle the holder to one share of common stock for each unit in settlement of
amounts payable under a long-term incentive compensation plan which has been
discontinued.
47
<PAGE>
A summary of the status of the Incentive Plan as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
and changes during 1997 is presented below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fixed Options
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Number of Shares Exercise Price Number of Shares Exercise Price
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of year 1,249,250 $17.50 --- ---
Granted 999,250 25.20 1,249,250 $17.50
Exercised (13,448) 17.50 --- ---
Forfeited (131,925) 17.75 --- ---
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at end of year 2,103,127 $21.14 1,249,250 $17.50
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Price of $17.50
(weighted-average contractual life
of 8.8 years) 1,107,877 $17.50
Price range of $17.50 - $25.625
(weighted-average contractual life
of 9.4 years) 995,250 25.20
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exercisable options:
December 31, 1996 --- ---
December 31, 1997 360,327 $17.50
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
The weighted-average fair value of each option grant (which is amortized over
the option vesting period for purposes of determining the pro forma impact) is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions used for 1997 and 1996: dividend
yield of .75%, expected volatility of 39.59% and 37.34%, risk-free interest rate
of 5.83% and 6.18% and an expected life of 6 years. The weighted-average fair
value of options granted at market price during 1997 and 1996 was $11.48 and
$7.70 per share, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of options
granted below market price during 1997 was $11.74. The weighted-average exercise
price of options granted at market price during 1997 and 1996 was $25.60 and
$17.50, respectively. The weighted-average exercise price of options granted
below market price during 1997 was $17.50. There were no options granted below
market price during 1996.
The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting
for its plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized based on
the fair value of its grants to employees under these plans. Had compensation
cost for the Company's stock-based compensation plans been determined based on
the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with
the method of FAS 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would
have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income As reported $122,786 $106,748
Pro forma 120,641 106,447
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per share As reported $ 1.25 $ 1.17
Pro forma 1.22 1.16
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE>
The effects of applying FAS 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not likely to
be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years.
Effective January 1, 1997, the Company adopted the DePuy, Inc. Employee Stock
Option/Purchase Plan ("the Stock Purchase Plan") for purposes of providing its
employees with an opportunity to participate in equity ownership by purchasing
DePuy stock at a discount. The maximum aggregate number of shares to be issued
under the Stock Purchase Plan is 600,000. The committee administering the Stock
Purchase Plan determines the maximum number of shares to be issued during each
annual period. All employees who have completed 90 days of employment with the
Company are eligible to participate in offerings under the Stock Purchase Plan.
In order to participate, an eligible employee must authorize a payroll deduction
at a rate of 1% to 10% of base pay, which is credited to the participant's plan
account. The option price of the stock under the Stock Purchase Plan is 85% of
the lower of the fair market value of the stock on the offering commencement
date or the termination date. During 1997, employees purchased approximately
86,500 shares at an average price of $17.96. The weighted-average fair value is
estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of .75%, expected volatility of
36.60% and a risk-free interest rate of 5.46%. The weighted-average fair value
was $5.49 per share. At December 31, 1997, approximately 513,500 shares were
reserved for future issuance.
NOTE 11 - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Prior to the reorganization and IPO described in Note 1, the total equity of the
Company was recorded as shareholder's net investment. As a result of the
reorganization and Initial Public Offering, which was effective October 30,
1996, the Company recorded the par value of the 98,580,000 shares outstanding as
$986 of common stock. In addition, certain identifiable components of equity
including cumulative translation adjustment, net unrealized appreciation on
securities and minimum pension liability adjustment, were capitalized separately
as of the date of the offering. The remaining equity of the Company totaling
$675,144 was recorded as additional paid-in capital resulting in the liquidation
of the shareholder's net investment balance.
Retained earnings of $128,058 at December 31, 1997, represents the net income of
the Company, less dividends declared, subsequent to the effective date of the
IPO.
NOTE 12 - EMPLOYEE PENSION PLANS AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS
Eligible Company employees participate in a noncontributory defined contribution
plan, sponsored by CUSHI prior to the reorganization, which covers substantially
all non-union employees of the Company in the United States. This plan provides
for targeted benefits based on the employee's average compensation in the years
preceding retirement. In general, the Company's policy is to contribute
actuarially determined amounts that are expected to be sufficient to meet
projected benefit payment requirements. Pension expense for this plan was
$1,303, $967 and $898 for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively, and was allocated
among participants based on the ratio of the target benefits for the Company's
participants relative to the total target benefits for all participants of the
plan.
Employees of international subsidiaries are covered by various pension benefit
arrangements, some of which are considered to be defined benefit plans for
financial reporting purposes. Assets of the plans are
49
<PAGE>
comprised primarily of equity securities. Benefits under these plans are
primarily based on levels of compensation. Funding policies are based on legal
requirements, tax considerations and local practices. Pension expense for the
most significant of these international plans was $1,529, $1,312 and $1,476 for
1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The following table provides the assumptions used to develop net periodic
pension cost and the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations
for the international defined benefit plan:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---------------- ----------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected long-term rate of return 9.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Weighted-average discount rate 9.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Rate of increase in compensation levels 7.0% 7.0% 7.0%
</TABLE>
The U.S. operating divisions also have a noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan which covers substantially all of the Company's union employees who meet
eligibility requirements. This plan generally provides pension benefits based on
the employee's years of service, with normal retirement at age 65. Pension
expense for this plan was $504, $380 and $381 for 1997, 1996 and 1995,
respectively.
The following table provides the assumptions used to develop net periodic
pension cost and the actuarial present value of projected benefit obligations
for the U.S. defined benefit plan:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets 7.5% 7.5% 7.5%
Weighted-average discount rate 7.0% 7.0% 7.0%
</TABLE>
The Company recorded a pension liability as required by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions", representing
the amount by which the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit
obligation exceeds the fair value of the plan's assets. A corresponding amount
is recognized as an intangible asset to the extent of the unamortized prior
service cost. The excess is charged directly to shareholders' equity.
50
<PAGE>
The amounts recorded at December 31, 1997 and 1996 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1997 December 31, 1996
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated Assets Exceed Accumulated Assets Exceed
Benefits Exceed Accumulated Benefits Exceed Accumulated
Assets Benefits Assets Benefits
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Actuarial present value of accumulated
benefit obligation:
Vested $(3,858) $(18,874) $(3,321) $(19,798)
Non-vested (1,512) --- (489) ---
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5,370) (18,874) (3,810) (19,798)
Effect of projected future salary
increases --- (4,404) --- (4,533)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligation (5,370) (23,278) (3,810) (24,331)
Plan assets at fair value 3,838 30,555 2,809 30,411
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligation (in excess of) or less than
plan assets (1,532) 7,277 (1,001) 6,080
Unamortized transition asset (10) (3,944) (13) (4,658)
Unrecognized net actuarial losses
(gains) 84 (1,274) 249 (168)
Unrecognized prior service costs 1,848 --- 737 ---
Adjustment to recognize minimum liability (1,922) --- (973) ---
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net (pension liability) prepaid pension cost recognized in
the consolidated balance sheets $(1,532) $ 2,059 $(1,001) $ 1,254
===================================================================================================================================
Amount reflected as an intangible asset $(1,848) $ --- $ (737) $ ---
===================================================================================================================================
Amount reflected as a minimum pension liability adjustment $ (74) $ --- $ (236) $ ---
===================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
The Company participates in a 401(k) plan for non-union employees of its
domestic operations. The Company's expense for this plan was $1,697, $1,511 and
$1,250 in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
The Company's senior management participates in a supplemental retirement plan
sponsored by the Company. The benefits under the plan are based on the
participants' salaries at their retirement dates adjusted by the total of
retirement income to be received by the participants from other sources. Expense
for this plan was $744, $806 and $763 for 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
NOTE 13 - POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
Certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company sponsor unfunded postretirement
healthcare benefit plans that cover either salaried or union employees. In
general, the Company pays a defined portion of an eligible retiree's healthcare
premium. The plans are contributory based on years of service, with
51
<PAGE>
contributions adjusted annually. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
includes the following components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Benefit cost for service during the year and other $ 591 $ 505 $ 305
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation 602 490 409
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $1,193 $ 995 $ 714
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>
The accrued postretirement benefit obligation recorded at December 31, 1997 and
1996 is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees $ 1,938 $1,751
Fully eligible active plan participants 310 279
Other active plan participants 7,425 6,703
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 9,673 8,733
Unrecognized net actuarial gains 1,136 1,157
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued postretirement benefit obligation $10,809 $9,890
==============================================================================================
</TABLE>
Expenditures for these benefits during 1997, 1996 and 1995 were immaterial.
The assumed healthcare cost trend rates used to measure the expected cost of
benefits for 1997 and 1996 ranged from 9.0% for a post-65 retiree to 12.0% for a
pre-65 retiree. The healthcare trend rates are assumed to decrease ratably over
a 10 year period down to 6.0%. An increase in this annual trend rate of 1.0%
would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December
31, 1997 by $1,972 and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components
of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the year then ended by $229.
The weighted-average discount rate used to measure the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 was 7.0%.
NOTE 14 - DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT The Company enters into forward exchange
contracts where it is considered prudent to manage its global foreign exchange
exposure. The forward contracts serve primarily to hedge nonfunctional currency
denominated transactions and commitments for the purchase of inventory within
the Company expected to occur within the year. The Company does not hold or
issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes or use leveraged
derivatives in its financial management program. The Company does not anticipate
any material adverse effect on its financial position resulting from its
involvement in these instruments, nor does it anticipate nonperformance by its
counterparty. The notional amounts of the Company's forward contracts at
December 31, 1997 and 1996
52
<PAGE>
were $11,198 and $136,636, respectively. The Company's domestic and
international operations are committed, under terms of the forward contracts, to
purchase the following currencies:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
U.S. Dollars 11,198 132,495
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
British Pounds - 88
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
French Francs - 12,424
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsche Marks - 2,508
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swiss Francs - 500
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
During the year ended December 31, 1997, and in prior years, all intercompany
inventory purchases which were denominated in a foreign currency, and certain
other transactions denominated in a nonfunctional currency, were hedged through
contracts with Corange International Ltd. ("CIL"), a related affiliate. As a
result of the pending change in ownership described in Note 17, CIL is no longer
providing these contracts to the Company. During 1998, the Company plans to
manage its foreign exchange exposure by entering into forward exchange contracts
and option contracts where it is considered prudent in an effort to protect its
income levels.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK Concentrations of credit risk may arise due to
financial instruments existing for groups of customers or counterparties having
similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet
contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic or other
conditions. The Company anticipates, however, that counterparties will be able
to satisfy fully their obligations under the contracts. The Company does not
obtain collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to
credit risk, but monitors the credit standing of the counterparty.
NOTE 15 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of
the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 1997 and 1996:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CARRYING AMOUNT FAIR VALUE CARRYING AMOUNT FAIR VALUE
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Nonderivatives: $62,143 $56,838 $20,167 $20,227
Long-term debt
===============================================================================
Derivatives: $ - $ (128) $ - $ 2,986
Forward contracts
===============================================================================
</TABLE>
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments", defines the fair value of a financial
instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties. The fair value of long-term debt is
estimated by discounting expected cash flows at the rates likely to be offered
to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair value of the
forward contracts represents the amount of
53
<PAGE>
hedging gain (or loss) deferred and generally reflects the estimated amounts
that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the
reporting date based on dealer quotes. All other nonderivative financial
instruments approximate fair value.
NOTE 16 - INDUSTRY SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in one dominant industry segment which includes the
manufacturing and marketing of joint and spinal implants, trauma products and
sports medicine soft goods used primarily by orthopaedic medical specialists in
both surgical and nonsurgical therapies.
Net sales, operating income and identifiable assets by geographic area are
presented in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Asia/Pacific Europe Other Eliminations Total
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 425,479 $86,656 $229,885 $28,168 $ --- $ 770,188
Sales to affiliated customers 77,888 1,381 94,705 27 (174,001) ---
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total sales $ 503,367 $88,037 $324,590 $28,195 $(174,001) $ 770,188
================================================================================================================
Operating income (loss) $ 122,814 $19,846 $ 71,566 $ (56) $ (21,140) $ 193,030
================================================================================================================
Identifiable assets $1,083,744 $67,781 $764,013 $32,199 $(867,080) $1,080,657
================================================================================================================
</TABLE>
54
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
United States Asia/Pacific Europe Other Eliminations Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 408,919 $79,093 $186,802 $22,459 $ --- $ 697,273
Sales to affiliated customers 72,753 629 56,588 --- (129,970) ---
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total sales $ 481,672 $79,722 $243,390 $22,459 $(129,970) $ 697,273
==============================================================================================================
Operating income (loss) $ 141,616 $18,389 $ 40,304 $(1,833) $ (10,973) $ 187,503
==============================================================================================================
Identifiable assets $1,060,737 $62,829 $362,732 $25,086 $(613,423) $ 897,961
==============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995
United States Asia/Pacific Europe Other Eliminations Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales to unaffiliated customers $ 377,264 $71,549 $166,652 $21,096 $ --- $ 636,561
Sales to affiliated customers 54,695 982 40,416 26 (96,119) ---
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total sales $ 431,959 $72,531 $207,068 $21,122 $ (96,119) $ 636,561
==============================================================================================================
Operating income (loss) $ 132,737 $20,710 $ 25,972 $ (931) $ (8,165) $ 170,323
==============================================================================================================
Identifiable assets $ 309,439 $54,940 $355,800 $18,410 $(115,339) $ 623,250
==============================================================================================================
</TABLE>
Intercompany transfers are made at negotiated prices which include profit
margin.
For the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, there were no customers
which accounted for 10% or more of the Company's sales.
Sales to unaffiliated customers based on customer location were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States $394,587 $373,771 $349,909
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Europe 229,312 186,053 172,189
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asia/Pacific 120,224 106,971 90,595
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other regions 26,065 30,478 23,868
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total sales to unaffiliated customers $770,188 $697,273 $636,561
=============================================================================================
</TABLE>
55
<PAGE>
NOTE 17 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 24, 1997, the shareholders of Corange entered into an agreement to sell
100% of its shares to an indirect subsidiary of Roche Holding Ltd ("Roche"), a
multinational company and world leader in research-based healthcare. This
transaction was finalized on March 5, 1998, upon approval from various
regulatory agencies. The purchase price, after contractually agreed price
adjustments, totals approximately $10.2 billion. As a result of this
transaction, Roche holds an approximate 84.2% interest in DePuy, Inc. The
Company continues to operate as an independent organization and represents an
additional segment for its majority shareholder, Roche. Headquartered in Basel,
Switzerland, Roche is an international research-based company with principal
businesses in pharmaceuticals, diagnostics, vitamins and fine chemicals, and
fragrances and flavors.
56
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of DePuy, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index
appearing under Item 14(a)(1) and (2) on pages 58 and 59 present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of DePuy, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards which require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed
above.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 9, 1998, except as to Note 17, which is as of March 5, 1998
57
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required to be provided under Item 10 with respect to the
Company's Executive Officers is included in Part I hereof under Item 4. The
material set forth under the headings "Election of Directors" and "Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" on pages 4 through 6 and page 11 of
the Company's Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting to be held on April 30,
1998 (the "Proxy Statement") is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The material set forth under the heading "Directors' Compensation" on page 6
of the Proxy Statement and under the heading "Executive Compensation" on pages 7
through 15 of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The material set forth under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management" on pages 2 through 3 of the Proxy Statement
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The material set forth under the heading "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" on pages 22 through 23 of the Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) The following are filed as part of this Report on Form 10-K:
(1) Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three years ended
December 31, 1997
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996
58
<PAGE>
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended
December 31, 1997
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the three years
ended December 31, 1997
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Accountants
(2) Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the three years
ended December 31, 1997
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last
quarter of 1997.
(c) Exhibits.
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).
3.2 By-laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-09345).
10.1 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Jim Lent and DePuy
Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.2 Employment Agreement, dated July 13, 1992, between Michael J. Dormer
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.3 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Michael J. Dormer
and DePuy International Limited, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.4 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between R. Michael
McCaffrey and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).**
10.5 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between William E. Tidmore
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.6 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Robert E. Morel and
DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.7 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Steve L. Artusi and
DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.8 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Thomas J.
Oberhausen and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).**
10.9 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between G. Taylor Seward
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.10 DePuy, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996.**
59
<PAGE>
10.11 DePuy, Inc. Employee Stock Option/Purchase Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.12 DePuy, Inc. Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.13 Corange Limited Incentive and Performance Plan-Executive
Remuneration, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-
09345).**
10.14 DePuy, Inc. and DePuy International Limited Orthopaedic Extra-
Compensation Opportunity, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).**
10.15 DePuy, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan No. 1) (As Amended
and Restated Effective as of October 1, 1996), incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.16 DePuy, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan No. 2) (As Amended
and Restated Effective as of October 1, 1996), incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.17 Trust Deed, dated July 1, 1993, between DePuy International Limited
and G. Taylor Seward and Others, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.18 Deed of Appointment and Retirement for the DePuy Executive
Retirement Benefits Scheme, dated January 23, 1996, between DePuy
International Limited and G. Taylor Seward and Others, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.19 DePuy, Inc. 1996 Incentive Planning and Special Recognition Program,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.20 DePuy, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan (As Amended and in Effect as of
October 1, 1996), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December
31, 1996.**
10.21 Tax Allocation and Indemnity Agreement, dated October 30, 1996,
between the Company, Boehringer Mannheim Corporation and Corange
Limited, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
10.22 Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 30, 1996, between
Corange Limited, Corange International Limited, Corange
International Holdings B.V., Pharminvest S.A., and the Company,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
10.23 Second License Agreement, dated July 24, 1979, by and between
Biomedical Engineering Corp. and DePuy Division of Bio-Dynamics,
Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).*
10.24 Amendment to Second License Agreement, dated March 25, 1985, by and
between Biomedical Engineering Trust and DePuy, Division of
Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).*
60
<PAGE>
10.25 Joint Venture Agreement, dated February 4, 1993, by and among DePuy
Inc., Biedermann Motech GmbH and Lutz Biedermann, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).*
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
___________________
* Confidential portions omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
61
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON
ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
DePuy, Inc.
March 31, 1998 By: /s/ James A. Lent
------------------------------------
James A. Lent
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE
REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ James A. Lent Chairman and Chief March 31, 1998
- --------------------------------- Executive Officer
James A. Lent
/s/ Thomas J. Oberhausen Senior Vice President and March 30, 1998
- --------------------------------- Chief Financial and
Thomas J. Oberhausen Accounting Officer
/s/ Richard C. Bolesky Director March 27, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Richard C. Bolesky
/s/ Michael J. Dormer Director March 31, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Michael J. Dormer
/s/ Richard A. Gilleland Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Richard A. Gilleland
/s/ Gerald C. Hanes Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Gerald C. Hanes
/s/ M.L. Lowenkron Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------
M.L. Lowenkron
/s/ Robert Volz, M.D. Director March 25, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Robert Volz, M.D.
/s/ Anthony Williams Director March 30, 1998
- ---------------------------------
Anthony Williams
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
DEPUY, INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Description Additions
- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance at
beginning costs and other end of
of period expenses accounts/(a)/ Deductions/(b)/ period
---------- ---------- --------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
For year ended December 31, 1997............ $8,534 $12,432 $ 30 $(3,274) $17,722
For year ended December 31, 1996............ 6,628 2,973 466 (1,533) 8,534
For year ended December 31, 1995............ 5,677 1,863 9 (921) 6,628
Deferred tax valuation allowances:
For the year ended December 31, 1997........ $2,754 $ 178 $--- $--- $ 2,932
For the year ended December 31, 1996........ 902 1,852 --- --- 2,754
For the year ended December 31, 1995........ 333 569 --- --- 902
</TABLE>
__________________
(a) Recovery of amounts previously written off.
(b) Bad debts written off and currency translation.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).
3.2 By-laws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).
10.1 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Jim Lent and
DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-09345).**
10.2 Employment Agreement, dated July 13, 1992, between Michael J.
Dormer and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).**
10.3 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Michael J.
Dormer and DePuy International Limited, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.4 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between R. Michael
McCaffrey and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.5 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between William E.
Tidmore and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-09345).**
10.6 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Robert E. Morel
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333- 09345).**
10.7 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Steve L. Artusi
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333- 09345).**
10.8 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between Thomas J.
Oberhausen and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.9 Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1996, between G. Taylor Seward
and DePuy Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333- 09345).**
10.10 DePuy, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.1 DePuy, Inc. Employee Stock Option/Purchase Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.**
10.12 DePuy, Inc. Senior Executive Incentive Compensation Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31,
1996.**
10.13 Corange Limited Incentive and Performance Plan-Executive
Remuneration, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333- 09345).**
10.14 DePuy, Inc. and DePuy International Limited Orthopaedic Extra-
Compensation Opportunity, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.22 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).**
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
10.15 DePuy, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan No. 1) (As
Amended and Restated Effective as of October 1, 1996),
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31,
1996.**
10.16 DePuy, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan No. 2) (As
Amended and Restated Effective as of October 1, 1996),
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31,
1996.**
10.17 Trust Deed, dated July 1, 1993, between DePuy International
Limited and G. Taylor Seward and Others, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).**
10.18 Deed of Appointment and Retirement for the DePuy Executive
Retirement Benefits Scheme, dated January 23, 1996, between DePuy
International Limited and G. Taylor Seward and Others,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-09345).**
10.19 DePuy, Inc. 1996 Incentive Planning and Special Recognition
Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-09345).**
10.20 DePuy, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan (As Amended and in Effect as
of October 1, 1996), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20
of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996.**
10.21 Tax Allocation and Indemnity Agreement, dated October 30, 1996,
between the Company, Boehringer Mannheim Corporation and Corange
Limited, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended
December 31, 1996.
10.22 Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 30, 1996, between
Corange Limited, Corange International Limited, Corange
International Holdings B.V., Pharminvest S.A., and the Company,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31,
1996.
10.23 Second License Agreement, dated July 24, 1979, by and between
Biomedical Engineering Corp. and DePuy Division of Bio-Dynamics,
Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).*
10.24 Amendment to Second License Agreement, dated March 25, 1985, by
and between Biomedical Engineering Trust and DePuy, Division of
Boehringer Mannheim Corporation, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-09345).*
10.25 Joint Venture Agreement, dated February 4, 1993, by and among
DePuy Inc., Biedermann Motech GmbH and Lutz Biedermann,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-09345).*
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1 Consent of Price Waterhouse LLP.
27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
________
* Confidential portions omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARY LIST
---------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C>
DePuy Finance LLC Corange U.K. Holdings Ltd.
DePuy Orthopadie GmbH DePuy International (Holdings) Ltd.
De Puy A.G. DePuy International Ltd.
DePuy Orthopedie SA DePuy Joints S.A.
DePuy Italia S.r.L. DePuy Taiwan
DePuy Iberica, S.A. DePuy Australia Pty Limited
Medical Trivest SL DePuy Mexico S.A. De C.V.
DePuy Japan Incorporated DePuy Canada Ltd.
DePuy Korea, Inc. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
DePuy Far East Pte Ltd. DePuy Orthopaedic Technologies, Inc.
DePuy GmbH DePuy ACE Medical Company
DePuy Olmed AB DePuy DuPont Orthopaedics (partnership)
DePuy Hungary Pamerland SCI
DePuy CZ s.r.o. Bioland SA
DePuy New Zealand Ltd. Mikroland
Sanatmetal Memo Implants
DePuy Hong Kong Ltd. Medinov
DePuy Medical Pte Ltd. Landos Nederland
DePuy, S.A. Sushrut
Matrix Biotech, Inc. Adker Mediequip
DePuy France/CFT France Medinov Distribution
GAM SCI Landochine
Orthotim AM SCI
Bioland Pharma Landos Int.
Landos Biomechique Landos Italia
Landos Espana Landos Inc.
DePuy Overseas Trading Ltd. Landos Orthopaedic Allemagne
DePuy Development, Inc. Expanded Optics, Inc.
Tweedbank DePuy Motech, Inc.
DePuy Portugal Lta. Orthogenesis Italy
7 Dormant Coys
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-17277 and No. 333-15163) of DePuy, Inc. of our
report dated February 9, 1998, except as to Note 17, which is as of March 5,
1998, appearing on page 57 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 215,567
<SECURITIES> 4,925
<RECEIVABLES> 132,204
<ALLOWANCES> 17,722
<INVENTORY> 169,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 605,406
<PP&E> 201,815
<DEPRECIATION> 97,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,080,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 202,166
<BONDS> 68,189
0
0
<COMMON> 987
<OTHER-SE> 761,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,080,657
<SALES> 770,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 770,188
<CGS> 229,028
<TOTAL-COSTS> 577,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (8,716)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 7,091
<INCOME-PRETAX> 194,655
<INCOME-TAX> 70,937
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 122,786
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> 122,786
<EPS-PRIMARY> 1.25
<EPS-DILUTED> 1.25
</TABLE>
