<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------------
FORM 10-K
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
Commission File Number 0-21225
---------------------
VISCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada 88-0101953
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer ID No.)
4674 Park Granada, Suite 110, Calabasas, California 91302
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(818) 225-0000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.[ ]
The aggregate market value of the registrant's voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the last reported sale price of the
registrant's Common Stock on March 31, 1997.
$14,439,900
---------------------
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, par
value $0.01, as of March 31, 1997.
21,728,000
---------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Visual Information Service Corp. ("VISC") was incorporated in Illinois in
May, 1990 and was founded to develop an electronic device capable of adding
modem, video data and telephone features to an ordinary television receiver over
a telephone line. The Company is seeking to take advantage of current and
future worldwide interest in networked interactivity by introducing a series of
affordable products and services that connect the standard television set and
the telephone so that interactivity (and especially the Internet) can become a
truly mass-market phenomenon. On November 28, 1995, VISC merged into Global
Telephone and Communications, Inc. ("GTCI"). GTCI was incorporated in Nevada on
May 30, 1984. The planned operation of GTCI was to provide consulting services
for the public and private sectors. At the time of the merger, GTCI was a shell
company and not operating as a going concern. To the Company's knowledge, GTCI
never operated as a consultant nor carried on any type of business at any time
prior to the merger. The merger was consummated because the common stock of
GTCI traded on the Nasdaq Bulletin Board, and thus, the merger provided VISC an
entity which already had a public presence. Pursuant to the merger each share
of common stock of VISC was exchanged for four shares of common stock of GTCI.
Following the merger, GTCI changed its name to Viscorp. As used herein, the
Company refers to Viscorp and its subsidiary VISC.
The Company continues to be in the development phase of operation. The
Company is developing two products -- the Universal Internet Television
Interface ("UITI") and the Electronic Device ("ED"). The Company's design team
has performed extensive research and development in connection with these two
products, including: the manufacture and implementation of industrial and
mechanical designs for the products' casing and remote control devices, the
creation of electrical designs and programmable logic, as well as the
development of new operating systems and enhancements to existing operating
systems (i.e. Amiga) to accommodate applications software. The long range
target of the Company's research and development efforts is to create a custom
chip and software component to target television manufacturers, telephone
companies and cable television companies. The Company is also engaged in
initial marketing efforts with original equipment manufacturers ("OEMs") to
incorporate the Company's technology into the OEM's products, and with
multi-level marketing groups (such as Quorom, an Arizona company that offers
marketing and sales assistance for manufacturers of "high-end" electronic
products) to discuss the marketing potential of the UITI and the ED. Although
the Company is continuing its marketing efforts, the Company has not yet entered
into any contracts with OEMs or marketing groups in connection with its
products. Since 1990, the Company has generated losses as a result of
significant expenditures on research and development and substantial overhead
expenses.
The Company has generated losses since its inception in May, 1990 and
currently cannot generate sufficient revenues and cash flow from operations to
meet its business obligations. The Company currently is insolvent and could be
the subject of bankruptcy proceedings unless it obtains additional capital. In
prior years, the Company was able to raise capital by issuing its Common Stock
in private placements. The Company's future operations are predicated on
raising additional capital in debt or equity markets. Any implementation of the
commercialization of the UITI and the ED is dependent on obtaining additional
financing that is necessary to achieve a level of sales adequate to support the
Company's operations. In December, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement
with a placement agent, Wincap, Ltd., for a private offering (the "Offering") of
the Company's 8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per
share (the "8% Preferred Stock"). The Company offered a minimum of 2,000,000
and a maximum of 6,666,667 shares of the 8% Preferred Stock (the "Preferred
Shares") for consideration of between $3,000,000 and $10,000,000. On March 6,
1997, the
1
<PAGE>
Company sold 2,031,832 Preferred Shares for a total consideration of
approximately $3,045,000. Of this amount, the Company received approximately
$2,690,000 which it intends to use for working capital. The Offering is ongoing
in an attempt to secure additional financing.
PRODUCTS
The UITI is a technology which is designed to give the home television
viewer access to the Internet, World Wide Web and other on-line services. The
ED is an enhanced technology which, in addition to on-line services, will
feature capabilities such as telephone reception and dial-up, facsimile,
pay-per-view options and electronic mail. The UITI and the ED are designed to
be placed next to or on top of a standard television set and connect directly to
a telephone jack either through a conventional telephone wire or through
wireless radio frequency connectivity. Through the use of specifically
configured fonts, the television set presents text and graphics that can be
viewed at normal television viewing distances. The UITI and the ED are equipped
with a modem, video and audio circuitry, and a controller. Extensive functions
may also be controlled with an enhanced remote control, currently being
developed by the Company's engineers. The commodities which constitute the raw
materials for the UITI and the ED presently are either available on the open
market, or are available from select suppliers. Negotiations currently are
taking place between the Company and various other entities in order for the
Company to acquire the materials necessary to produce the technology for the
UITI and the ED.
The UITI is a very similar technology to the device currently being
marketed as "WEB-TV". The UITI is strictly an internet access product using the
customer's television set and phone line. Although the UITI technology is
similar to WEB-TV technology, the Company intends to market the UITI technology
differently. The Company is seeking to license the UITI technology to OEMs to
be built into a television set. The Company began negotiations with various
OEMs in May, 1996, but no contracts have yet been entered into with any such
OEMs. The ED incorporates the features of the UITI and adds many features not
available with WEB-TV. Some of these include: the ability (i) to make and
receive telephone calls through the television set, (ii) to display "caller-id"
information on the television screen, (iii) to send facsimile, and (iv) to
function as a television tuner. As with the UITI, the Company is seeking to
license the ED technology to OEMs to be built into a television set.
The Company believes that recently introduced products, such as WEB-TV, are
creating market awareness and may help consumers understand such products.
However, late entry into the interactive television market could result in lost
sales opportunities for the Company and difficulty with brand recognition once
the Company's products are introduced. In addition, the Company may not have
adequate financial resources to successfully bring its technology to the
marketplace. See "Item 7 -- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources." Therefore
the Company has decided to shift its focus from producing the set top box to the
licensing of its technology to OEMs.
In April, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Solectron France
S.A., a US-based manufacturing company listed on the New York Stock Exchange
("Solectron"), pursuant to which Solectron produced the first 30 prototypes of
the UITI at Solectron's facilities in France. The agreement expired when
Solectron's design participation was completed upon the delivery of the UITI
prototypes to the Company in September of 1996. The total service price for the
contract was 231,000 French francs (taxes excluded). The approximate U.S. value
of this contract was $56,000. Although the contract price was stated in French
francs, Solectron continually has billed and the Company continually has made
all payments in United States currency. Approximately $12,000 remains as an
outstanding balance due Solectron pursuant to this agreement. Discussions are
ongoing between the Company and Solectron with respect to its payment
obligations. Solectron's manufacturing expertise in collaboration with the
2
<PAGE>
Company's design techniques produced the working prototypes of the UITI. The
Company expects the UITI technology to be fully operational and deliverable to
OEMs by mid- to late-1997.
The Company conducted a field test of a preliminary prototype of the ED
with Booth Communications, a cable television system operator based in
Birmingham, Michigan. The ED was placed in the homes of approximately twenty
cable subscribers and connected to the existing cable set-top box to provide
access to the Internet, CompuServe and other services, including facsimile,
TV-based speaker phone, caller ID and pay-per-view ordering. Sigma Research
Management Group, an independent market-research firm, conducted a series of
quantitative and qualitative studies (including focus groups) of the
participating cable subscribers. The trial lasted approximately six months and
was concluded in March, 1996. The study revealed that some functions provided
by the ED may require redesign, changes to the feature array and expansion of
capability. Technical and market-research results from this trial have been
incorporated into the Company's revised prototype designs of the UITI and the
ED. The Company has not yet fully completed the development of the UITI and the
ED devices. Final design and testing of both hardware and software to be used
with these products is ongoing. The Company has entered into preliminary
discussions with certain OEMs in an attempt to license the UITI and the ED
technology.
The Company expects the ED technology to be fully operational and
deliverable to OEMs by late-1997. The ED accesses information available from
computer sites, which is transmitted over lines provided by telephone and cable
companies, and is displayed on the television screen. The Company must rely
upon third parties to provide the foregoing signal transmission mechanisms.
However, cable companies have begun the process of installing cable lines
capable of supporting the ED system, in response to market forces calling for
the improvement of antedated cable equipment. Therefore, the Company need not
enter into any material alliances or collaborations in this regard. Although
there are no statistics available as to the actual number of cable systems so
equipped, the installation of data delivery systems within cable television
systems appears to be proceeding at a slower pace than originally anticipated.
However, both the UITI and the ED can be configured to receive all necessary
data over ordinary telephone lines.
Although the field test demonstrated the functionality of the Company's
technology, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully
manufacture or market the UITI and/or the ED technology.
PATENTS
The Company owns several patents covering the features of the UITI and the
ED, which expire commencing on March 7, 2012, assuming all maintenance fees are
paid. The Company relies on patents to protect its proprietary rights. The
Company's success will depend in part on its ability to obtain patent protection
for its products and to operate without infringing on the patent or other
proprietary rights of others. There can be no assurance that patent
applications filed by the Company will result in the issuance of patents of the
scope and breadth of those previously granted to the Company or that any patents
now or hereafter owned by the Company will afford protection against competitors
which develop similar technology or provide products with competitive advantages
to those designed by the Company. In addition, there can be no assurance that
any patents issued to the Company will be held valid if subsequently challenged
or that others will not claim rights in the patents and other proprietary
technology without violating any of the Company's proprietary rights. The
Company has been involved in legal proceedings with regard to certain of its
intellectual property rights. See "Item 3 -- Legal Proceedings." There can be
no assurance that others will not independently develop similar products,
duplicate the Company's products or design products that circumvent any patents
used by the Company. Patent enforcement is expensive, and the Company may not
have the resources to pursue such protection. In
3
<PAGE>
the absence of patent protection, the Company's business may be adversely
affected by competitors who independently develop substantially equivalent or
superior technology.
LICENSES
In December, 1995, the Company entered into an agreement with Amiga
Technologies GmbH, a German company ("Amiga"), for a nonexclusive,
nontransferable license to the Amiga computer operating system technology. The
initial term of the agreement expires December 26, 1998. Unless terminated, in
accordance with the terms of the agreement, the agreement is renewable for
subsequent three-year periods at the licensee's option. In January, 1996, the
Company paid an initial royalty deposit of $450,000 to Amiga. The Company may
be required to pay additional royalty payments as defined in the agreement.
Because Amiga was the subject of German bankruptcy proceedings in 1996 and was
subsequently purchased by Gateway 2000, Inc. ("Gateway"), it is unclear whether
the licensing agreement remains valid and whether the Company will be required
to pay additional royalty payments. The Company has accounted for the
possibility of being required to pay additional royalty payments by recording an
additional long-term liability in the amount of $450,000 for the unpaid portion
of the minimum royalty payment and has expensed an additional $450,000 in the
fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 1996. The Company intends to seek
to enter into a new licensing agreement with Gateway and has initially contacted
Gateway regarding the same.
Assuming the agreement is still valid, the agreement provides that the
Company may sublicense its rights under the license for others to perform any
licensed acts for the Company. The Company intends to use the Amiga operating
system and chip sets in producing the UITI and the ED and also intends to
sublicense the Amiga technology to others. The Company believes the Amiga
operating system will enhance the operational capacity of the UITI and the ED.
The Company has produced a prototype of the base board utilizing the Amiga
operating system and chip sets which boards will be used to produce the UITI and
the ED which currently is in the process of being tested.
In December, 1994, the Company entered into a license agreement with NTN
Communications, Inc. ("NTN"). The initial term of the agreement expires
December 31, 2001. Unless terminated, in accordance with the terms of the
agreement, the agreement will be extended for a period of seven years. The
agreement provides the Company with a nonexclusive worldwide license to promote,
market and develop an on-line computer service, which will be provided by NTN,
for use with the Company's products. The technology of this service provides
two-way interactive computerized games that are broadcast to multiple locations,
can be played by multiple participants at each location and enables the
retrieval and processing of data entered by the participants. The Company is
required to pay usage royalties as defined in the agreement. The Company agreed
to pay NTN $250,000 upon signing the agreement. To date, the Company has paid
$200,000 of this amount, with $50,000 having been due to NTN on December 31,
1996. NTN granted the Company an extension for the payment of this amount which
expired on March 31, 1997. The Company intends to reevaluate the
appropriateness of this license and intends to have further discussions with NTN
regarding this agreement. The use of this license has not yet generated any
revenues for the Company.
In January, 1995, the Company entered into a license agreement with Digital
Sciences, Inc. ("Digital") to license the ED technology and services. The
agreement with Digital (the "Digital Agreement") granted to Digital an exclusive
license to use the ED technology and services, solely in the health care
industry in the United States and Canada, for a period of ten years. On
February 27, 1995, the Company received an initial license fee payable in the
form of 250,000 shares of Digital stock valued at $2.50 per share, for a total
value of $629,688, which amount reflected a 35% discount from the trading price
of $3.875 per share or $968,750 because the shares were restricted (the "Digital
Stock").
4
<PAGE>
Pursuant to a merger in April 1996, each share of Digital Stock was converted to
one share of stock of Intelligent Decision Systems, Inc. ("IDSI").
In November, 1996, the Company transferred all of its shares of IDSI stock
to an individual in exchange for the cancellation of a loan of $500,000 made by
such individual to the Company in October, 1996. The $500,000 loan was a demand
loan which bore no interest. When the individual requested repayment, the
Company negotiated a transaction whereby 250,000 shares of IDSI stock would be
transferred to this individual in repayment of the loan. The Company and the
individual settled on a $2.00 per share valuation on the stock because the price
of the IDSI stock which is traded on the Nasdaq Bulletin Board was fluctuating
between $1.375 and $2.19 during the period when the stock was transferred. In
addition to the initial license fee, Digital is obligated to pay additional
license fees based on a percentage of gross revenues derived from the use of the
ED technology and services. The Company did not receive any additional license
fees from Digital in 1995, other than the initial license fee, and there is no
assurance that the Digital Agreement will generate additional license fees in
the future.
OTHER MATERIAL AGREEMENTS
On July 18, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Amiga (the
"Amiga Agreement") to acquire certain assets of Amiga (the "Amiga Assets"). The
Amiga Assets would have been acquired by the Company from the bankruptcy estate
of Escom Beteiligungs GmbH (a former manufacturer and distributor of IBM
compatible computers throughout Europe) (the "bankruptcy estate of Escom"). The
Amiga Agreement was cancelled during the beginning of the fourth quarter of 1996
because the Company was unable to secure the necessary financing to consummate
the transaction. No new agreement has been entered into between the Company and
Amiga. In the first quarter of 1997, Amiga was purchased by Gateway.
Although the Amiga Agreement was cancelled, the Company intends to continue
its use of the Amiga computer operating system in accordance with the provisions
of its December, 1995 licensing agreement with Amiga. The Company intends to
seek to enter into a new licensing agreement with Gateway with respect to the
intellectual property and has initially contacted Gateway regarding the same.
COMPETITION
The Company faces intense competition within the interactive television
industry, an industry in the midst of a period of significant volatility due to
the convergence of computing, telephony and television. Currently, there are
many companies developing, in various stages, systems utilizing technology
similar to the Company's technology. Products or procedures may become
commercially available that are competitive with the Company's products. Most
of the Company's competitors have substantially longer operating histories and
substantially greater financial and managerial experience and resources.
However, the Company does not believe that any of these companies currently are
developing products with the same set of performance capabilities the Company
expects to develop with its technology. The company intends to have discussions
with many OEMS with the intent of licensing the UITI and the ED technology to be
built into new television sets. The Company believes that this is one of the
features of its technology that gives it a competitive advantage. Currently
most other planned and existing similar products (i.e. WEB-TV) are set-top
devices and are not being licensed to OEMs.
The UITI is a very similar technology to the device currently being
marketed as "WEB-TV". The UITI is strictly an internet access product using the
customer's television set and phone line. Although the UITI technology is
similar to WEB-TV technology, the Company intends to market the UITI technology
differently. The Company is seeking to license the UITI technology to OEMs to
be built
5
<PAGE>
into a television set. As of this date, the Company has not entered into any
contracts or agreements with OEMs, and does not know if any of its competitors
have entered into such agreements with the exception of Interactive Video
Publishing, Inc. ("IVP"). IVP entered into a license agreement with Curtis
Mathis Holding Inc. ("Curtis") in April, 1996 which purported to incorporate the
Company's technology into television sets produced by Curtis. The Company filed
a lawsuit against IVP and three of its employees in July, 1996 and received a
preliminary injunction against IVP's used of the Company's technology in
December, 1996. See "Item 3 -- Legal Proceedings".
The ED incorporates the features of the UITI and adds many features not
available with WEB-TV. Some of these include: the ability to (i) make and
receive telephone calls through the television set, (ii) to display "caller-id"
information on the television screen, (iii) to send facsimile, and (iv) to
function as a television tuner. As with the UITI, the Company is seeking to
license the ED technology to OEMs to be built into a television set.
Competitors for the Company include the following: (i) television
manufacturers such as Sony Electronics Corp. and Philips Consumer Electronics
Co. -- often working in conjunction with computer companies -- that have
introduced Internet-access set-top devices such as WEB-TV and/or "smart"
interactive TV sets; (ii) computer companies such as Oracle Corp., IBM Corp.,
Sun Microsystems Inc., Netscape Communications Corp. and Apple Computer Inc. who
have announced plans to develop "network computers", which are stripped-down
devices to be used in place of an expensive home personal computer system to
provide access to the Internet and e-mail; (iii) video game companies such as
Sega Genesis, Sony Electronics Corp. and Philips Consumer Electronics Co. that
plan to enhance their game machines with Internet access and on-line
capabilities; (iv) cable television set-top device manufacturers such as General
Instrument and Scientific Atlanta that are enhancing the overall performance
capabilities of their current analog and newer all-digital converter boxes; and
(v) independent companies like the Company.
The Company believes that recently introduced products, such as WEB-TV, are
creating market awareness and may help consumers understand such products.
However, late entry into the interactive television market could result in lost
sales opportunities for the Company and difficulty with brand recognition once
the Company's products are introduced. In addition, the Company may not have
adequate financial resources to successfully bring its technology to the
marketplace. See "Item 7 -- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources." Therefore
the Company has decided to shift its focus from producing the set top box to the
licensing of its technology to OEMs.
EMPLOYEES
In addition to its officers, the Company has four employees. The Company
also routinely utilizes the services of consultants.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company currently leases a 3,100 square foot office facility in
Chicago, Illinois pursuant to a lease that expires on May 31, 1997. The annual
base rent for this facility is approximately $44,000. During the March 15, 1997
meeting of the Board of Directors, the Board voted to relocate the Company's
operations to Calabasas, California effective April 11, 1997. The Company has
entered into a lease for approximately 2,800 square feet of office space in
Calabasas, California at an annual base rent of $35,000. The lease term extends
through December 31, 1997. At that time, the lease will continue on a
month-to-month basis.
6
<PAGE>
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company, two directors, Jerome Greenberg, Roger Remillard and a former
director, William Buck, are defendants in a lawsuit filed by a former employee,
Nolan Bushnell. This lawsuit was filed on December 15, 1994 in the California
Superior Court and was subsequently removed to the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California. The second amended complaint dated
April 30, 1996 alleges multiple claims including breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of oral agreement, wrongful termination of employment, interference with
contract, breach of employment agreement and fraudulent misrepresentation, all
arising out of the plaintiff's employment over a period of 2 1/2 months as the
Company's President, the termination of his employment and the aborted
negotiations for a proposed merger between the Company and the plaintiff's
company. Damages claimed are in excess of $10 million for failure to transfer
approximately four million shares of the Company's stock allegedly promised to
the plaintiff, salary and expenses arising out of his employment relationship
and punitive damages. The dollar amount of damages claimed is dependent upon
the current per share price of the Company's stock.
The Company has filed a claim against the plaintiff for fraud, breach of
fiduciary duty, declaratory relief, rescission and negligent interference with
prospective business advantage arising out of the same set of occurrences as the
plaintiff's complaint. The Company's first summary adjudication motion,
challenging the plaintiff's claim for failure to transfer approximately four
million shares of Company stock, was granted by the District Court on August 29,
1996, thus precluding the plaintiff from recovering any shares of stock from the
Company. Although this claim has been dismissed, the plaintiff filed a motion
for reconsideration, which was heard by the District Court on October 11, 1996.
On December 6, 1996, the District Court denied the plaintiff's motion for
reconsideration. The Company filed a summary adjudication motion against the
plaintiff on all his remaining claims, which also was heard by the District
Court on October 11, 1996. On December 6, 1996, the Court granted the Company's
summary adjudication motion and dismissed all of the plaintiff's remaining
claims. It remains possible that the summary adjudication orders could be
overturned on appeal. Should the orders be overturned, and should the plaintiff
prevail on these claims, the Company may be materially adversely affected by the
outcome.
The Company filed a lawsuit against three individuals formerly associated
with the Company, David Serlin, Steve Owens and Kaori Kuwata, and the
corporation which currently employs each of the foregoing individuals,
Interactive Video Publishing, Inc., on July 25, 1996 in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company's complaint
alleges misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and breach of fiduciary
duty arising out of the individual defendants' previous confidential
relationships with the Company, access to proprietary information including the
technology, hardware design, software, parts selection, feature set and
architecture of the ED technology and subsequent transmittal of this proprietary
information to the defendant corporation for its beneficial use. The Company is
seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages. The
defendants filed various counterclaims against the Company on September 13, 1995
alleging intentional interference with economic advantage, intentional
interference with contractual relations and unfair competition arising out of
the same set of occurrences. The defendants are seeking damages for lost
profits, injury to business reputation, diminution of value of proprietary data,
loss of customers and loss of investments. In addition, the defendants are
seeking a declaratory judgment of no misappropriation of trade secrets,
injunctive relief and punitive damages.
The Company has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which motion
was heard by the District Court on October 25, 1996. On December 4, 1996, the
District Court granted the Company's motion and issued a preliminary injunction
against the defendants. The injunction enjoins the defendants, during the
pendency of the action, from using any of the Company's trade secrets or
technology.
7
<PAGE>
Because the lawsuit is still in the discovery stage, it is not possible to
determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the defendants'
counterclaims. However, if the defendants succeeded on their counterclaims,
and were awarded significant monetary damages, and/or injunctive or declaratory
relief against the Company, the Company could be materially adversely affected.
The Company believes the allegations in the defendants' counterclaims are
without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against the actions.
An additional lawsuit was filed against the Company by David Serlin and
another individual formerly associated with Company, Marvin Lerch, on
December 20, 1996 in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California. The complaint alleges multiple claims including
breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary
duty, wrongful termination and conversion, all arising out of the plaintiffs'
employment with the Company during 1995. Damages claimed are for failure to
transfer 400,000 shares of the Company's stock and 284,000 options to
purchase the Company's stock allegedly promised to each of the plaintiffs,
lost profits and business opportunities arising out of the employment
relationships and punitive damages. The dollar amount of damages claimed is
dependent upon the current per share price of the Company's stock.
Because the lawsuit has not yet reached the discovery stage, it is not
possible to determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the
plaintiffs' claims. However, if the plaintiffs succeeded on their claims, and
were awarded significant monetary damages against the Company, the Company could
be materially adversely affected. Although the Company has not had enough time
to respond to the complaint, the Company intends to vigorously defend itself
against the action.
On March 27, 1997, a company that was engaged to provide investment banking,
corporate finance and financial advisory services filed a civil lawsuit
against the Company. The complaint alleges breach of contract and is
claiming damages in the amount of $463,237. The Company believes the claim
is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against the action.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The following matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1996:
In December, 1996, a majority of the shareholders voted to amend the
Company's Articles of Incorporation to authorize the issuance of 10,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share. This action was
undertaken in connection with the Company's December, 1996 private offering of
8% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. See "Item 7 -- Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
8
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's shares have been traded on a limited basis on the Nasdaq
Bulletin Board under the symbol VICP since December 27, 1995. The following
table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices as reported on the
Nasdaq Bulletin Board. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.
PERIOD LOW HIGH
Fourth Quarter of 1995 (beginning December 8, 1995) 5-1/8 5-5/16
First Quarter of 1996 5-1/4 8-1/4
Second Quarter of 1996 8-1/8 11-3/8
Third Quarter of 1996 8-3/4 11-1/4
Fourth Quarter of 1996 1-1/4 9-5/16
First Quarter of 1997 1-1/8 2-1/16
There were 127 shareholders of record of the Common Stock as of March 31,
1997.
DIVIDENDS
The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends on its Common Stock
and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its Common Stock in the
foreseeable future, but intends to retain future earnings, if any, for
reinvestment in the future operation and expansion of the Company's business and
related development activities. Any future determination to pay cash dividends
on its Common Stock will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will
be dependent upon the Company's financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems
relevant, as well as the terms of any financing arrangement.
The Company paid approximately $53,000 in dividends to the holders of its
8% Preferred Stock on March 31, 1997. See "Item 1. Business -- General".
9
<PAGE>
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain financial data with respect to the
Company. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the
Company's financial statements (including the notes thereto), and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
appearing elsewhere in this report.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended
December 31,
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statement of
Operations Data:
License Income $ --- $ --- $ --- $629,688 $ ---
Gross Profit --- --- --- --- ---
Total operating expenses (598,031) (1,248,360) (1,339,364) (3,222,489) (7,885,929)
Loss from operations (598,031) (1,248,360) (1,339,364) (2,592,801) (7,885,929)
Other income (expense), net (67,552) (112,246) 3,338 4,748 (170,989)
Net loss (665,583) (1,360,606) (1,336,026) (2,588,053) (8,056,918)
Net loss per share (221.86) (0.19) (0.12) (0.15) (0.37)
Shares used in computing
net loss per share 3,000 7,104,092 11,775,976 17,190,915 21,914,630
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
---------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments $ --- $ --- $552,878 $739,930 $8,654
Working capital (78,279) (128,371) 388,875 287,713 (2,486,191)
Total assets 29,492 16,982 664,328 1,258,853 242,302
Long-term debt 993,932 1,494,161 --- --- 29,865
Common stock 1,000 800,200 2,566,167 212,080 221,280
Accumulated deficit (1,045,144) (2,405,750) (3,741,776) (6,329,829) (14,386,747)
Total shareholders' equity
(deficit) (1,044,144) (1,605,550) 493,752 706,636 (2,782,886)
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information in this section should be read together with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are included elsewhere
in this annual report on Form 10-K. The Company's annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1996 ("1996 10-K") contains certain
forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involve substantial risks and uncertainties.
When used in this 1996 10-K, the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," and
"expect" and similar expressions as they relate to the Company and its
management are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. A number
of important factors could cause the actual results, performance or achievements
of the Company for 1997 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in
any such forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation:
(a) the Company's ability to generate revenues from product sales or
licensing arrangements with respect to its products, (b) increasing competition;
and (c) ability of the Company to raise additional capital.
The Company has incurred net losses in its last four fiscal years.
Moreover, there can be no assurance that the ED or the UITI will ever generate
significant revenues, will generate any revenues or that they will do so in the
time periods estimated by the Company. There can be no assurance that any of
the Company's products will be introduced or marketed successfully, or that the
Company will ever achieve a profitable level of operations or, if profitability
is achieved, that it can be sustained.
The Company's auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their
report with respect to the Company's financial statements included herein which
states among other things, that the Company cannot currently generate
sufficient revenues and cash flow from operations to meet its business
obligations and, therefore, future operations are predicated on raising
additional capital in debt or equity markets. In December, 1996, the Company
entered into an agreement with a placement agent, Wincap, Ltd. ("Wincap"),
for a private offering (the "Offering") of the Company's 8% Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "8% Preferred
Stock"). The Company offered a minimum of 2,000,000 and a maximum of
6,666,667 shares of the 8% Preferred Stock (the "Preferred Shares") for
consideration of between $3,000,000 and $10,000,000. On March 6, 1997, the
Company sold 2,031,832 Preferred Shares for a total consideration of
approximately $3,045,000. Of this amount, the Company received approximately
$2,690,000 which it intends to use for working capital. The Offering is
ongoing in an attempt to secure additional financing.
The Company's President, William S. Buck, resigned on January 8, 1997, and
a Severance Agreement was approved by the Board of Directors and executed on
that same date. Lawrence D. Siegel temporarily assumed the duties previously
performed by Mr. Buck for a period of two months commencing January 22, 1997.
At the March 15, 1997 meeting of the Board of Directors (the "March 15, 1997
Meeting"), the following actions were approved: Mr. Siegel was elected to the
positions of President, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company;
Robert J. Wussler was elected to the position of Chairman of the Board of
Directors, replacing Jerome Greenberg who resigned from that position as of
March 15, 1997; Hugh A. Jencks was elected to assume the position of Secretary
of the Company which had been vacant since the February 14, 1997 resignation of
Mitchell Melamed; Mr. Greenberg and Roger Remillard's employment agreements were
terminated with their concurrence; and Robert E. Reid resigned from his position
as a Director. On January 27, 1997 the Company terminated David Rosen from his
position as a Vice-President. The Company has not yet appointed a successor to
assume Mr. Rosen's duties.
11
<PAGE>
In November, 1996, the Company transferred all of its shares of IDSI stock
to an individual in exchange for the cancellation of a loan of $500,000 made by
such individual to the Company in October, 1996. The $500,000 loan was a demand
loan which bore no interest. When the individual requested repayment, the
Company negotiated a transaction whereby 250,000 shares of IDSI stock would be
transferred to this individual in repayment of the loan. The Company and the
individual settled on a $2.00 per share valuation on the stock because the price
of the IDSI stock which is traded on the Nasdaq Bulletin Board was fluctuating
between $1.375 and $2.19 during the period when the stock was transferred. The
Company will recognize a loss on this transaction of approximately $130,000.
See "Item 1 -- Business -- Licenses."
On July 18, 1996, the Company entered into an agreement with Amiga (the
"Amiga Agreement") to acquire certain assets of Amiga (the "Amiga Assets"). The
Amiga Assets would have been acquired by the Company from the bankruptcy estate
of Escom Beteiligungs GmbH (a former manufacturer and distributor of IBM
compatible computers throughout Europe) (the "bankruptcy estate of Escom"). The
Amiga Agreement was cancelled during the beginning of the fourth quarter of 1996
because the Company was unable to secure the necessary financing to consummate
the transaction. In the first quarter of 1997, Amiga was purchased by Gateway.
See "Item 1 -- Business -- Other Material Agreements."
Prior to its attempted purchase of Amiga, in December, 1995, the Company
entered into an agreement with Amiga for a nonexclusive, nontransferable license
to the Amiga computer operating system technology. The initial term of the
agreement expires December 26, 1998. Unless terminated, in accordance with the
terms of the agreement, the agreement is renewable for subsequent three-year
periods at the licensee's option. In January, 1996, the Company paid an initial
royalty deposit of $450,000 to Amiga. The Company may be required to pay
additional royalty fees as defined in the agreement. Because Amiga was the
subject of German bankruptcy proceedings in 1996 and was subsequently
purchased by Gateway 2000, Inc. ("Gateway"), it is unclear whether the
licensing agreement remains valid and whether the Company will be required to
pay additional royalty payments. The Company has accounted for the
possibility of being required to pay additional royalty payments by recording
an additional long-term liability in the amount of $450,000 for the unpaid
portion of the minimum royalty payment and has expensed an additional
$450,000 in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 1996. The
Company intends to seek to enter into a new licensing agreement with Gateway
and has initially contacted Gateway regarding the same.
The Company, two directors, Jerome Greenberg and Roger Remillard, and a
former director, William Buck, are defendants in a lawsuit filed by a former
employee, Nolan Bushnell. This lawsuit currently is being tried in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California. The second
amended complaint dated April 30, 1996 alleges multiple claims including breach
of fiduciary duty, breach of oral agreement, wrongful termination of employment,
interference with contract, breach of employment agreement and fraudulent
misrepresentation, all arising out of the plaintiff's employment over a period
of 2 1/2 months as the Company's President, the termination of his employment
and the aborted negotiations for a proposed merger between the Company and the
plaintiff's company. Damages claimed are in excess of $10 million for failure
to transfer approximately four million shares of the Company's stock allegedly
promised to the plaintiff, salary and expenses arising out of his employment
relationship and punitive damages. The dollar amount of damages claimed is
dependent upon the current per share price of the Company's stock. The
Company's first summary adjudication motion, challenging the plaintiff's claim
for failure to transfer approximately four million shares of Company stock, was
granted by the District Court on August 29, 1996, thus precluding the plaintiff
from recovering any shares of stock from the Company. Although this claim has
been dismissed, the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, which was
heard by the District Court on October 11, 1996. On December 6, 1996, the
District Court denied the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. The Company
filed a summary
12
<PAGE>
adjudication motion against the plaintiff on all his remaining claims, which
also was heard by the District Court on October 11, 1996. On December 6, 1996,
the Court granted the Company's summary adjudication motion and dismissed all of
the plaintiff's remaining claims. It remains possible that the summary
adjudication orders could be overturned on appeal. Should the orders be
overturned, and should the plaintiff prevail on these claims, the Company may be
materially adversely affected by the outcome.
The Company filed a lawsuit against three individuals formerly associated
with the Company, David Serlin, Steve Owens and Kaori Kuwata, and the
corporation which currently employs each of the foregoing individuals,
Interactive Video Publishing, Inc., on July 25, 1996 in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California. The Company's complaint
alleges misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and breach of fiduciary
duty arising out of the individual defendants' previous confidential
relationships with the Company, access to proprietary information including the
technology, hardware design, software, parts selection, feature set and
architecture of the ED technology and subsequent transmittal of this proprietary
information to the defendant corporation for its beneficial use. The Company is
seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages. The
defendants filed various counterclaims against the Company on September 13, 1995
alleging intentional interference with economic advantage, intentional
interference with contractual relations and unfair competition arising out of
the same set of occurrences. The defendants are seeking damages for lost
profits, injury to business reputation, diminution of value of proprietary data,
loss of customers and loss of investments. In addition, the defendants are
seeking a declaratory judgment of no misappropriation of trade secrets,
injunctive relief and punitive damages.
The Company has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which motion
was heard by the District Court on October 25, 1996. On December 4, 1996, the
District Court granted the Company's motion and issued a preliminary injunction
against the defendants. The injunction enjoins the defendants, during the
pendency of the action, from using any of the Company's trade secrets or
technology. Because the lawsuit is still in the discovery stage, it is not
possible to determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the
defendants' counterclaims. However, if the defendants succeeded on their
counterclaims, and were awarded significant monetary damages, and/or injunctive
or declaratory relief against the Company, the Company could be materially
adversely affected. The Company believes the allegations in the defendants'
counterclaims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against
the actions.
An additional lawsuit was filed against the Company by David Serlin and
another individual formerly associated with Company, Marvin Lerch, on
December 20, 1996 in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California. The complaint alleges multiple claims including
breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary
duty, wrongful termination and conversion, all arising out of the plaintiffs'
employment with the Company during 1995. Damages claimed are for failure to
transfer 400,000 shares of the Company's stock and 284,000 options to
purchase the Company's stock allegedly promised to each of the plaintiffs,
lost profits and business opportunities arising out of the employment
relationships and punitive damages. The dollar amount of damages claimed is
dependent upon the current per share price of the Company's stock.
Because the lawsuit has not yet reached the discovery stage, it is not
possible to determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the
plaintiffs' claims. However, if the plaintiffs succeeded on their claims, and
were awarded significant monetary damages against the Company, the Company could
be materially adversely affected. Although the Company has not had enough time
to respond to the complaint, the Company intends to vigorously defend itself
against the action.
On March 27, 1997, a company that was engaged to provide investment banking,
corporate finance and financial advisory services filed a civil lawsuit
against the Company. The complaint alleges breach of contract and is
claiming damages in the amount of $463,237. The Company believes the claim
is without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against the action.
13
<PAGE>
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
1996 COMPARED TO 1995.
The Company had no license income in fiscal 1996 compared to $629,688 in
fiscal 1995. The $629,688 represented the value of the 250,000 shares of
Digital stock received by the Company as an initial license fee pursuant to the
Digital Agreement in 1995.
Research and development expenses decreased to $955,570 for fiscal 1996
from $1,010,884 for fiscal 1995, a decrease of $55,314. This decrease was due
to the decreased activity relating to the development of the Company's
products.
Travel and entertainment expenses decreased to $374,317 for fiscal 1996
from $743,390 for fiscal 1995, a decrease of $369,073. The decrease was due to
the reduction in travel by executive officers in connection with work relating
to the Company's patents and to the decreased activities relating to the
development of its products.
An amount of $300,000 has been set aside for reimbursement of expenses
pursuant to a severance agreement which includes the Company's former
president and a consultant. The severance agreement provides that the
Company shall reimburse these individuals for reasonable expenses associated
with the Company's business incurred by them up to an amount equal to
approximately $300,000 upon submission to the Company of valid documentation.
The amount of expenses currently claimed is $255,350. The Company has
recorded a liability of $300,000. This liability has been reduced by
$96,478, which represents amounts loaned to the former president by the
Company.
Legal fees increased to $1,065,005 for fiscal 1996 from $552,109 for fiscal
1995, an increase of $512,896. This increase was due to increased activity
relating to the Bushnell litigation and Serlin litigation, and legal fees
associated with the filing by the Company of a registration statement on Form 10
in 1996 and legal fees associated with the attempted acquisition of Amiga.
Other general and administrative expenses increased to $1,002,974 for
fiscal 1996 from $553,791 for fiscal 1995, an increase of $449,183. This
increase was due to preparation and production of marketing and advertising
materials, the relocation of the Company into larger office facilities, and
hiring of additional employees, increased accounting fees and fees for
directors and officer's insurance, and increased depreciation on the
COmpany's assets.
Consulting fees decreased to $231,343 for fiscal 1996 from $353,915 for
fiscal 1995, a decrease of $122,572. This decrease was due to the decreased
use of consultants in 1996. Due to the increased number of employees, the
Company had less of a need to rely upon consultants in 1996.
An amount of $118,237 has been charged to Operating Expenses for fiscal
1996 in connection with failed efforts to raise additional capital in 1996.
An amount of $900,000 has been charged to Operating Expenses for fiscal
1996 in connection with the Company's December, 1995 licensing agreement with
Amiga. In January, 1996, the Company paid an initial royalty deposit of
$450,000 to Amiga. Pursuant to the licensing agreement with Amiga, the Company
may be obligated to pay an additional royalty fee of $450,000 in December, 1998.
The Company granted stock options to various employees and consultants
during fiscal 1996. In connection with the granting of these options, the
Company recorded compensation and consulting expense, and a related increase to
additional paid-in-capital, in the amount of $2,927,083 during 1996. The amount
recorded represents the difference between the exercise price and the fair
market value of the Company's Common Stock, as determined by reference to the
publicly traded value of the stock, as of the date the options were granted.
14
<PAGE>
1995 COMPARED TO 1994.
License income for 1995 was $629,688 which represented the value of 250,000
shares of Digital stock issued to the Company in payment of an initial
license fee pursuant to the Digital Agreement. The value of the stock of
Digital received by the Company reflected a discount from the trading price
because the stock was restricted.
Research and development expenses increased to $1,010,884 for fiscal 1995
from $701,460 for fiscal 1994, an increase of $309,424. This increase was due
to: (i) costs related to the field test of the ED with Booth Communications;
(ii) additional costs related to the continuing development of the printed
circuit layout for the base board, including fees for engineers and consultants;
and (iii) costs of producing design and mechanical drawings for manufacturers of
the prototypes of the UITI and the ED.
Travel and entertainment expenses increased to $743,390 for fiscal 1995
from $194,162 for fiscal 1994, an increase of $549,228. Because the Company was
successful in developing a prototype of the UITI and the ED during 1995, the
Company significantly increased its marketing efforts to develop relationships
with companies to manufacture and distribute the Company's products and to raise
additional equity financing.
Legal fees increased to $552,109 for fiscal 1995 from $28,508 for fiscal
1994, an increase of $523,601. This increase was due to: (i) legal fees
related to a lawsuit filed against the Company in December 1994 by a former
director and officer of the Company; (ii) legal fees related to the merger of
VISC and GTCI; and (iii) legal fees related to the negotiation and documentation
of the license agreements with Amiga and Digital.
Consulting fees for consultants other than engineers increased to $353,915
for fiscal 1995 from $73,786 for fiscal 1994, an increase of $280,129. This
increase was primarily due to the consulting fees associated with the
formulation of the Company's business plan in 1995.
Other general and administrative expenses increased to $562,191 for fiscal
1995 from $341,448 for fiscal 1994, an increase of $220,743. This increase was
primarily due to the increased salaries resulting from the hiring of additional
personnel, directors fees paid to the Chairman and printing costs associated
with the preparation of the Company's business plan.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has generated losses since its inception in May, 1990 and
cannot currently generate sufficient revenues and cash flow from operations to
meet its business obligations. In July, 1996, the Company entered into a
purchase agreement with Amiga to acquire the Amiga Assets for a purchase price
of $20 million less certain administrative costs. However, the Amiga Agreement
was cancelled during the beginning of the fourth quarter of 1996 because the
Company was unable to secure the necessary financing to consummate the
transaction. In the first quarter of 1997, Amiga was purchased by Gateway.
Although the Amiga Agreement was cancelled, the Company intends to continue its
use of the Amiga computer operating system in accordance with the provisions of
its December, 1995 licensing agreement with Amiga. See "Item 1 -- Business --
Licenses."
15
<PAGE>
In addition, the Company paid approximately $45,000 out of working capital
to Solectron through September, 1996, pursuant to the April 9, 1996 agreement
with Solectron. The payment was made upon delivery of the 30 UITI prototypes by
Solectron. Approximately $12,000 remains as an outstanding balance due
Solectron pursuant to this agreement. Discussions are ongoing between the
Company and Solectron with respect to its payment obligations. Should the
Company enter into further agreements with Solectron, working capital will be
used to pay for additional prototypes.
The Company anticipates no future need for any material capital
expenditures. In prior years, the Company was able to fund its operations
through the issuance of its Common Stock in transactions exempt under the
Securities Act of 1933, and through stockholder loans. Any implementation of
the commercialization of the UITI and the ED technology is dependent on
obtaining additional financing that is necessary to achieve a level of sales
adequate to support the Company's operations. The Company is insolvent and
cannot currently generate sufficient revenues and cash flow from operations to
meet its business obligations. Therefore, future operations are predicated on
raising additional capital in debt or equity markets. The Company has entered
into an agreement with a placement agent for a private offering of its shares of
the 8% Preferred Stock and has received approximately $2,690,000 to date from
such offering. The Company is using the proceeds from this offering for working
capital.
16
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Financial Statements of the Company and Report of Independent Auditors
are filed as exhibits hereto, listed under Item 14 of this Report and
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to each of
the directors and executive officers of the Company as of March 31, 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert J. Wussler. . . . 60 Chairman of the Board of Directors and Director
Lawrence D. Siegel . . . 48 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jerome Greenberg . . . . 71 Vice President, Treasurer and Director
Donald Gilbreath . . . . 40 Vice President - Engineering
Hugh A. Jencks . . . . . 52 Vice President, Secretary and Chief Operating Officer
Roger Remillard. . . . . 47 Director
Thomas Glenndahl . . . . 50 Director
</TABLE>
ROBERT J. WUSSLER. Mr. Wussler was elected Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company on March 15, 1997. He was elected to the Board of
Directors in May, 1996. From 1992 to the present he has been the President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Wussler Group, located in Potomac, Maryland,
advising companies in TV, cable, interactive and other related activities. From
1989 to 1992, he was the President and CEO of COMSAT Video Enterprises which was
in the business of satellite delivery of entertainment to the U.S. lodging
industry.
LAWRENCE D. SIEGEL. Mr. Siegel was elected President, Chief Executive
Officer and a Director of the Company on March 15, 1997. Prior to that Mr.
Siegel had been appointed to assume temporarily the duties previously performed
by William S. Buck who resigned all positions from the Company on January 8,
1997. From November, 1994 until December, 1995, Mr. Siegel was the President of
Yellow Pearl, Inc., a software company founded by him in 1994. From 1992 to
1994, Mr. Siegel was the President of T-HQ, Inc., a software company. From 1988
to 1992, he was the President of Atari Corporation.
JEROME GREENBERG. Mr. Greenberg is a co-founder and major shareholder of
the Company and has been the Treasurer from its inception in May, 1990, and a
Vice President since December, 1996. Mr. Greenberg served as the Company's
Chairman from May, 1990 until March, 1997. From 1982 through 1989 he was the
principal shareholder and President of Leader Communications Inc. ("Leader"), a
Chicago-based cellular phone and two-way radio company. In 1989, Mr. Greenberg
sold Leader to Fleet Call, Inc., which subsequently changed its name to NextTel.
Mr. Greenberg is also the President
17
<PAGE>
of Hampden Green Management Corporation, a private real estate management and
development company, which is not an active entity at this time.
DONALD GILBREATH. Mr. Gilbreath has served as Vice President - Engineering
since he joined the Company in November, 1994. Prior to November, 1994, he
worked for the Company as a consultant and was instrumental in designing, and
producing the initial prototypes of, the ED. He formed Gilbreath Systems Inc.
("Gilbreath Systems") a general engineering consulting company in 1992. From
1980 to 1991, Mr. Gilbreath worked for Commodore International Ltd., a computer
manufacturer which filed for bankruptcy in April, 1994, where he served in
various capacities, including Director of Product and Market Development (1987
to 1991), Director of Research and Development (1985 to 1987) and Manager,
Consumer Products Research and Development (1985 to 1987). Under his direction,
Commodore developed the first consumer-priced multimedia compact disc player.
HUGH A. JENCKS. Mr. Jencks was elected to the position of Secretary on
March 15, 1997 and Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company in
December, 1996. Prior to such time, he had been a consultant to the Company
since July, 1996. Mr. Jencks has been an active Director of the Michigan Cable
Telecommunications Association for many years and currently serves as its
Associate Director. In July, 1996, Mr. Jencks completed a special project for
Michigan Governor John Engler, by designing and building Michigan Government
Television. From 1982 to August, 1996, Mr. Jencks was the General Manager of
Booth Communications ("Booth") in Birmingham, Michigan. During his tenure at
Booth he led a cable television system into several trials of interactive
technology with Cableshare of London, Ontario, Ameritech, NTN and the Company.
ROGER REMILLARD. Mr. Remillard is a co-founder of the Company and has
served as a director and Vice President - Technology since the Company's
inception. Mr. Remillard is the inventor of the ED and has filed several
patents relating to interactive television technology. Prior to 1990, Mr.
Remillard served as a consultant in the communications industry, specializing in
the field of two-way, rapid cellular telephony and data-radio communications.
THOMAS GLENNDAHL. Mr. Glenndahl was elected to the Board of Directors on
August 5, 1996. He is the founder and, since 1982 has been the Chief Executive
Officer of the Aspect Group, an international education group with offices in 26
countries.
SECTION 16(a) COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), requires the Company's officers (as defined in the Exchange
Act), directors and persons who own greater than ten percent of a registered
class of the Company's equity securities to file reports of ownership and
changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and The
Nasdaq National Market. Based on a review of forms sent to the Company, the
Company has determined the following with respect to the following directors,
officers and 10% owners: (a) each of Jerome Greenberg, Hugh Jencks, Robert
Wussler, Lawrence Siegel, Robert Reid (formerly an officer of the Company who
is no longer employed with the Company) and Mitchell Melamed (formerly an
officer of the Company who is no longer employed with the Company) failed to
timely file his statement of initial beneficial ownership on Form 3 ("Form 3");
(b) the Form 3 for Roger Remillard, Thomas Glenndahl and Don Gilbreath has not
been filed but has been sent to the SEC for filing on April 14, 1997; and
(c) each of William Buck (a 10% owner who was formerly the President and a
Director of the Company but who is no longer employed by the Company) and
David Rosen (formerly an officer whose employment with the Company has been
terminated) have failed to file a Form 3.
18
<PAGE>
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors consists of six directors, divided into two classes.
The first class is made up of non-employee directors who serve one-year terms
and the second class is made up of employee directors who serve three-year
terms. At the August 5, 1996 meeting of shareholders, the shareholders elected
three directors in each class to serve for terms expiring at the 1997 and 1999
annual meetings, respectively. The three individuals elected as non-employee
directors were: Robert J. Wussler, Robert E. Reid and Thomas Glenndahl. The
three individuals elected as employee directors were: Jerome Greenberg, William
H. Buck and Roger Remillard. Executive officers of the Company are appointed by
the Board of Directors and serve at its discretion.
Mr. Buck resigned from his position as a Director and President of the
Company on January 8, 1997. The remaining board members accepted Mr. Buck's
resignation and approved the Severance Agreement dated as of January 8, 1997
between the Company and Mr. Buck. The Severance Agreement provides that the
Company shall reimburse Mr. Buck for all reasonable expenses associated with the
Company's business incurred by him as of the date thereof, up to an amount
approximately equal to $300,000. The amount of expenses currently claimed by
Mr. Buck is approximately $58,850. Additional expenses, totalling approximately
$196,500, are claimed by Raquel Velasco pursuant to the Severance Agreement.
Ms. Velasco's expenses, like Mr. Buck's, were incurred in connection with the
attempted acquisition of Amiga. The Severance Agreement with Mr. Buck also
pertains to Ms. Velasco because the Company desired to settle all claims arising
out of the attempted purchase of Amiga at the same time. The Severance
Agreement released the Company from any further obligations and liabilities
toward Mr. Buck and Ms. Velasco. At the March 15, 1997 Meeting, the Board
approved the following actions: Lawrence D. Siegel was elected to the positions
of President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, replacing Mr. Buck; Mr.
Wussler was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors, replacing Mr. Greenberg
who resigned from that position as of the same date, and Mr. Reid resigned from
his position as a Director. The Company has not yet appointed a successor to
fill the seat vacated by Mr. Reid.
19
<PAGE>
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
compensation for fiscal years 1994, 1995 and 1996 paid to the Company's Chief
Executive Officer. No other executive officers of the Company received
compensation in excess of $100,000 during such periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term
Compensation
Annual Compensation Awards
---------------------------- ------------
Securities
underlying All other
Name Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) options compensation($)
- --------------------------------- ---- ---------- --------- ------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
William H. Buck 1996 60,000 -- -- --
Chief Executive Officer 1995 60,000 -- -- --
and Director .................. 1994 5,000 -- 384,000 --
</TABLE>
OPTION GRANTS IN 1994
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential realizable value
Percent of at assumed annual rates of
Number of total stock price appreciation for
Shares options option term
Underlying granted to ------------------------------
Options employees Exercise or
Granted in fiscal base price Expiration
Name (#) year ($/Sh) date 5% ($) 10% ($)
- --------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
William H. Buck
Chief Executive Officer.. 384,000 0 .625 11/11/04 66,307 382,080
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Shares
Underlying Unexercised Value of Unexercised in-
Options at Fiscal the-money Options at
Year-End (#) Fiscal Year-End($)(1)
------------------------- -------------------------
Name Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable
- ------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- -------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
William H. Buck
Chief Executive Officer....................... 384,000/0 $336,000/0
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
(1) The value of "in the money" options represents the difference between the
exercise price of such option and the $1.50 closing price of the Company's
Common Stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Bulletin Board on March 31, 1997.
20
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of the Common Stock as of March 31, 1997 by (a) each director and
executive officer of the Company, (b) each person known by the Company to own
beneficially five percent or more of the Common Stock and (c) all current
executive officers, directors and five percent or more beneficial owners as a
group.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of
Shares
Beneficially Percent of Common
Directors, Officers and Five Percent Stockholders Owned Stock Outstanding
------------------------------------------------- ------------ -----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Jerome Greenberg (A). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,658,000(1) 30.6
William H. Buck (B) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,384,000(2) 11.0
Roger Remillard (C) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744,000(3) 8.0
Donald Gilbreath (D). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230,400(4) 5.7
Hugh A. Jencks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,000(5) *
Robert Wussler. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,000(5) *
Thomas Glenndahl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65,000(5) *
Lawrence D. Siegel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- --
All directors, officers and 5% or more
beneficial owners as a group
(eight persons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,101,400 55.7
</TABLE>
- --------------------------
* Less than one percent.
(A) The address of Mr. Greenberg is c/o Christa Prange, 300 North State Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60610.
(B) The address of Mr. Buck is 11 Bis Rue Du Dobropol, 75017, Paris France.
(C) The address of Mr. Remillard is 250 Warwick Lane, Crystal Lake, Illinois
60014.
(D) The address of Mr. Gilbreath is 543 Powell Lane, Westchester, Pennsylvania
19380.
(1) Includes 100,000 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of
vested stock options.
(2) Includes 384,000 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of
vested stock options.
(3) Includes 488,000 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of
vested stock options.
(4) Includes 230,400 shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of
vested stock options.
(5) Represents shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of vested
stock options.
21
<PAGE>
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company made advances to Roger Remillard during 1993 totaling $127,532.
As of December 31, 1993, the receivable was forgiven and recorded as
compensation expense.
The Company loaned $39,238 to William H. Buck and $18,670 to Roger
Remillard during 1995. As of December 31, 1995, these amounts were forgiven and
recorded as compensation expense.
The Company's president resigned on January 8, 1997. The resignation
relates to his position as officer and director of the Company and any of the
Company's wholly owned subsidiaries. The Board of Directors approved a
severance agreement which includes the former president and a consultant who
performed various services for the Company. The severance agreement provides
that the Company shall reimburse the former president and the consultant for
reasonable expenses associated with the Company's business incurred by them up
to an amount approximately equal to $300,000 upon submission to the Company of
valid documentation which must be approved by the Company. The amount of
expenses currently claimed is $255,350.
The Company has recorded a liability of $300,000. This liability has been
reduced by $96,478, which represents amounts loaned to the former president by
the Company.
22
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
1. The following consolidated financial statements of the Company
and its subsidiaries, together with the applicable report of
independent public accountants:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994 and for the period from May 1, 1990
(inception) through December 31, 1996 (the Cumulative Period).
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994 and for the period from
May 1, 1990 (inception) through December 31, 1996 (the Cumulative
Period).
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994 and for the period from May 1, 1990
(inception) through December 31, 1996 (the Cumulative Period).
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Other General and Administrative Expenses for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and for the period
from May 1, 1990 (inception) through December 31, 1996 (the
Cumulative Period).
2. Financial statement Schedules:
None
3. Exhibits:
EXHIBIT NO.
-----------
2.1* Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October 12,
1995 by and between Global Telephone and Communications,
Inc. and Visual Information Services Corp. and its
shareholders.
3.1* Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of VisCorp
3.2* Articles of Incorporation, as amended of Visual Information
Services Corp.
3.3* By-laws of VisCorp
3.4* By-laws of Visual Information Services Corp.
4.1* Form of the Company's Stock Certificate
23
<PAGE>
10.1* Service Agreement dated as of April 8, 1996 between Viscorp
and Solectron France, S.A.
10.2* Technology License Agreement dated as of January 1, 1995 by
and between Visual Information Services Corp. and Digital
Sciences, Inc.
10.3* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and Jerome Greenberg dated as of November 12, 1994.
10.4* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and Don Gilbreath dated as of November 12, 1994.
10.5* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and William Buck dated as of November 12, 1994.
10.6* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and Roger Remillard dated as of November 12, 1994.
10.7* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and David Rosen dated as of January 7, 1996.
10.8* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and Christa A. Prange dated as of May 1, 1996.
10.9* License Agreement between Amiga Technologies GmbH and Visual
Information Service Corp. dated as of December 26, 1995.
10.10* Agreement for the Purchase of Inventories, Industrial
Property Rights and certain other Rights and Assets between
Escom AG, Amiga Technologies GmbH and VisCorp Acquisitions
Inc. dated July 18, 1996.
10.11* Gateway Information Provider Agreement between NTN
Communications, Inc. and Visual Information Services Corp.
dated as of December 13, 1994.
10.12* Viscorp Stock Option Plan
10.13* Severance Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and William Buck and Raquel Velasco dated as of
January 8, 1997.
10.14* Employment Agreement between Visual Information Services
Corp. and Hugh Jencks dated as of September 1, 1996.
10.15* Placement Agent Agreement between Visual Information
Services Corp. and Wincap, Ltd. dated December 6, 1996.
11.1* Earnings Per Share Computation
21* Subsidiaries
- -----------------
* Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, as amended, File No.
0-21225 and incorporated herein by reference.
24
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 15th day of
April, 1997.
VISCORP
By: /s/ ROBERT J. WUSSLER
----------------------------------
Robert J. Wussler, Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ ROBERT J. WUSSLER Chairman of the Board and Director April 15, 1997
- --------------------------
Robert J. Wussler
/s/ LAWRENCE D. SIEGEL President, Chief Executive Officer and April 15, 1997
- -------------------------- Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Lawrence D. Siegel
/s/ HUGH A. JENCKS Vice President, Secretary and Chief April 15, 1997
- -------------------------- Operating Officer (Principal Financial and
Hugh A. Jencks Accounting Officer)
/s/ JEROME GREENBERG Vice President, Treasurer and Director April 15, 1997
- --------------------------
Jerome Greenberg
/s/ ROGER REMILLARD Director April 15, 1997
- --------------------------
Roger Remillard
/s/ THOMAS GLENNDAHL Director April 15, 1997
- --------------------------
Thomas Glenndahl
</TABLE>
25
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Form 10-K Items 14(a)(1) and (2)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C O N T E N T S
---------------
Page
----
Report of Blackman Kallick Bartelstein, LLP,
Independent Auditors 1-2
Financial Statements [Item 14(a)(1)]:
Consolidated Balance Sheets 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations 5
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) 6-9
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 10-11
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 12-31
Consolidated Other General and Administrative Expenses 32
Financial Statement Schedules [Item 14(a)(2)]:
All financial statement schedules are omitted because the information
described therein is not applicable, not required or is furnished in the
financial statements or notes thereto.
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Stockholders
Viscorp
Chicago, Illinois
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VISCORP (A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for the three years ended December 31, 1996 and for the period from May 1,
1990 (inception) through December 31, 1996 (the cumulative period). These
financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of VISCORP (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE
ENTERPRISE) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 1996 and for the
cumulative period, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the company
will continue as a going concern. The company continues to be a development
stage enterprise and to date has not generated any revenues from product sales
or positive cash flows from operations. The ultimate success of the company is
dependent upon its ability to complete the development of its products and
technology and to successfully introduce its products to the consumer
marketplace. This development and introduction must be accomplished during a
period in which competing technologies and products are rapidly evolving and are
already available to consumers. The company must also be able to raise
significant additional capital in debt or equity markets for both the
development and introduction described above and also to sustain the day-to-day
operations of the company. All of the above factors raise substantial doubt
about the company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
F-1
<PAGE>
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental schedule
of other general and administrative expenses is presented for analysis purposes
and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information
has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
BLACKMAN KALLICK BARTELSTEIN, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 4, 1997
F-2
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 1996 and 1995
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
------
1996 1995
---------- ----------
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3) $ 8,654 $ 739,930
Receivables
Stockholders 20,000 -
Other (Net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $25,000
in 1995) - -
Prepaid expenses 30,478 100,000
---------- ----------
Total Current Assets 59,132 839,930
---------- ----------
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Equipment and furniture 62,893 55,428
Equipment and furniture under
capital lease 46,589 -
Test equipment 18,040 4,883
---------- ----------
127,522 60,311
Less accumulated depreciation (36,733) (26,028)
---------- ----------
Total Property and
Equipment, Net 90,789 34,283
---------- ----------
OTHER ASSETS
Investment securities - Digital
Sciences, Inc. (Notes 4 and 12) - 284,375
Intangible assets (Net of accumulated
amortization) (Note 5) 86,628 94,595
Other 5,753 5,670
---------- ----------
92,381 384,640
---------- ----------
$ 242,302 $1,258,853
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-3
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY
1996 1995
---------- ----------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $1,439,283 $ 304,889
Accrued expenses 132,728 12,934
Notes payable to related parties
(Note 6) 652,953 234,394
Other notes payable (Note 6) 116,837 -
Due to former officer and consultant
(Note 16) 203,522 -
---------- ----------
Total Current Liabilities 2,545,323 552,217
NOTES PAYABLE (Net of portion included
in current liabilities) (Note 6) 29,865 -
MINIMUM ROYALTY OBLIGATION (Note 14) 450,000 -
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities 3,025,188 552,217
---------- ----------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10) - -
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(Exhibit C) (Note 7)
Common stock 221,280 212,080
Additional paid-in capital 15,096,123 7,169,698
Deferred compensation (3,713,542) -
Deficit accumulated during the
development stage (14,386,747) (6,329,829)
Net unrealized investment losses
(Note 4) - (345,313)
---------- ----------
Total Stockholders' (Deficit)
Equity (2,782,886) 706,636
---------- ----------
$ 242,302 $1,258,853
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
F-4
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT B
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
May 1, 1990
(Inception)
through
December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
LICENSE INCOME (Note 12) $ - $ 629,688 $ - $ 629,688
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Research and development 955,570 1,010,884 701,460 3,798,180
Minimum royalty expense (Note 14) 900,000 - - 900,000
Travel and entertainment 374,317 743,390 194,162 1,509,432
Unallocated (Note 16) 300,000 - - 300,000
Legal fees (Note 10)
Former employee litigation 568,997 287,990 5,797 862,784
Other 496,008 264,119 22,711 1,035,016
Consulting 231,343 353,915 73,786 724,955
Stock option compensation (Note 11) 2,927,083 - - 2,927,083
Fund raising fees for failed offerings 118,237 - - 118,237
Rent expense - related parties (Note 9) 11,400 8,400 9,100 39,400
Other general and administrative 1,002,974 553,791 332,348 2,426,267
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total Operating Expenses 7,885,929 3,222,489 1,339,364 14,641,354
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
OPERATING LOSS 7,885,929 2,592,801 1,339,364 14,011,666
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
OTHER EXPENSE (INCOME)
Interest expense - Stockholder debt 25,659 2,910 - 237,928
(Note 6)
Interest expense - Other 21,959 1,103 - 23,064
Interest income (7,385) (8,761) (4,095) (20,241)
Loss on disposal of equipment 1,068 - 757 4,642
Loss on investment (Note 4) 129,688 - - 129,688
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total Other Expense
(Income), Net 170,989 (4,748) (3,338) 375,081
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
NET LOSS $ (8,056,918) $ (2,588,053) $ (1,336,026) $(14,386,747)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
(Note 2) 21,914,630 17,190,915 11,775,976
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
LOSS PER SHARE (Note 2) $ (.37) $ (.15) $ (.12)
------------ ------------ ------------
------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-5
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock
$.01 Par Value
(50,000,000 Shares
Authorized)
Date of ---------------------
Transaction Shares Amount
----------- ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, May 1, 1990 (Inception)
Sale of Stock for Cash ($1 per share*) 5/90 - $
Net Loss through 1991 - -
------ ------
Balance, through 1991 - -
Net Loss for the Year - -
------ ------
Balance, December 31, 1992 - -
Exercise of Stock Options, Stock Issued for
Retirement of Stockholder Advances ($1 per
share*) (Note 11) 5/93 - -
Net Loss for the Year - -
------ ------
Balance, December 31, 1993 - -
Exercise of Stock Options, Stock Issued for
Retirement of Stockholder Advances ($1 per
share*) (Note 11) 8/94 - -
Three-for-one Stock Split (Note 1) 11/94 - -
Stock Sold for Cash ($2.50 per share**; class A
and B Warrants Valued at $0) (Note 7) 11/94 - -
Stock Issued in Exchange for Cancellation of
Stockholder Debt ($2.50 per share**) 11/94 - -
Stock Exchanged for Consulting Services
($2.50 per share**) (Note 7) 11/94 - -
Stock Issuance Costs (Note 7) - -
Net Loss for the Year - -
------ ------
Balance, December 31, 1994 - -
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-6
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT C
(Page 1)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock
no par value Deficit
------------------------- Accumulated
Additional During the
Paid-In Deferred Development
Shares**** Amount Capital Compensation Stage
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
1,000 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ -
- - - - (379,561)
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
1,000 1,000 - - (379,561)
- - - - (665,583)
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
1,000 1,000 - - (1,045,144)
799,200 799,200 - - -
- - - - (1,360,606)
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
800,200 800,200 - - (2,405,750)
199,800 199,800 - - -
2,000,000 - - - -
500,000 1,250,000 - - -
160,000 400,000 1,669,361 - -
62,000 155,000 - - -
- (238,833) - - -
- - - - (1,336,026)
---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
3,722,000 2,566,167 1,669,361 - (3,741,776)
F-7
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock
$.01 Par Value
(25,000,000 Shares
Authorized)
Date of -------------------------
Transaction Shares Amount
----------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1994 - -
Sale of Stock for Cash ($2.50 per share**) (Note 7) Various - -
Sale of Stock for Cash ($5.00 per share***) (Note 7) Various - -
Stock Issued as Compensation ($2.50 per share**)
(Note 7) Various - -
Stock Issued for Consulting Services ($2.50
per share**) (Note 7) Various - -
Stock Issuance Costs (Note 7) - -
Effect of Merger (Note 2) 21,208,000 212,080
Net Loss for the Year - -
---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 21,208,000 212,080
Exercise of Stock Options
Sale of Stock for Cash ($2.50 per share) (Note 7) Various 20,000 200
Sale of Stock for Cash ($2.00 per share) (Note 7) Various 500,000 5,000
Sale of Stock for Cash ($.625 per share) (Note 7) Various 400,000 4,000
Stock Issuance Costs (Note 7) - -
Stock Issuance Costs (Note 7) - -
Deferred Compensation Related to Grant of
Stock Options (Notes 7 and 11) - -
Amortization of Deferred Compensation (Note 7) - -
Net Loss for the Year - -
---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1996 22,128,000 $ 221,280
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
</TABLE>
*$.0833 as adjusted for subsequent stock split and merger
**$.625 as adjusted for merger
***$1.25 as adjusted for merger
****Not restated
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-8
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT C
(Page 2)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock Deficit
No Par Value Accumulated
-------------------------- Additional During the
Paid-In Deferred Development
Shares**** Amount Capital Compensation Stage
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
3,722,000 $2,566,167 $1,669,361 $ - $(3,741,776)
1,108,000 2,770,000 - - -
53,000 265,000 - - -
150,000 375,000 - - -
26,500 66,250 - - -
- (330,000) - - -
(5,059,500) (5,712,417) 5,500,337 - -
- - - - (2,588,053)
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
- - 7,169,698 - (6,329,829)
- - 49,800 - -
- - 995,000 - -
- - 246,000 - -
- - (2,805,000) - -
- - 2,800,000 - -
- - 6,640,625 (6,640,625) -
- - - 2,927,083 -
- - - - (8,056,918)
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
$ - $ - $15,096,123 $ (3,713,542) $(14,386,747)
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------ ------------
F-9
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT D
(Page 1)
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
May 1, 1990
(Inception)
through
December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $ (8,056,918) $ (2,588,053) $ (1,336,026) $(14,386,747)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization 41,256 13,136 4,798 101,186
License income received in stock - (629,688) - (629,688)
Stock option compensation 2,927,083 - - 2,927,083
Unallocated 300,000 - - 300,000
Loss on investment 129,688 - - 129,688
Services paid in stock - 416,250 - 416,250
Interest on stockholder loans 25,659 2,910 - 237,930
Interest on nonstockholder loan 6,082 - - 6,082
Provision for losses on advances - 25,000 - 36,509
Loss on disposal of equipment 1,068 - 757 4,642
(Increase) decrease in
prepaid expenses 69,522 (93,427) (6,573) (30,478)
Increase in
Accounts payable 1,134,394 189,373 40,231 1,439,283
Accrued expenses 119,794 7,874 2,408 132,728
Minimum royalty obligation 450,000 - - 450,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total Adjustments 5,204,546 (68,572) 41,621 5,521,215
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net Cash Used in
Operating Activities (2,852,372) (2,656,625) (1,294,405) (8,865,532)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of equipment - - 500 500
Capital expenditures (30,518) (14,784) (20,004) (100,674)
Advances to related company - (25,000) - (36,509)
Patents and other expenditures (13,838) (28,023) (73,946) (142,234)
Advances to stockholders (116,478) - - (116,478)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net Cash Used in
Investing Activities (160,834) (67,807) (93,450) (395,395)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-10
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT D
(Page 2)
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
May 1, 1990
(Inception)
through
December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1996
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Repayments of checks issued in excess
of funds on deposit $ - $ - $ (31,745) $ -
Borrowings from nonstockholders 100,000 - - 100,000
Borrowings from stockholders 992,900 231,484 775,000 4,083,384
Principal payments under
notes payable (5,970) - - (5,970)
Repayments to affiliated company - - (18,689) -
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock 1,300,000 3,035,000 1,250,000 5,586,000
Payment of stock issuance costs (5,000) (355,000) (33,833) (393,833)
Repayment of stockholder borrowings (100,000) - - (100,000)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash Provided by
Financing Activities 2,281,930 2,911,484 1,940,733 9,269,581
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS (731,276) 187,052 552,878 8,654
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
BEGINNING OF YEAR 739,930 552,878 - -
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
END OF YEAR $ 8,654 $ 739,930 $ 552,878 $ 8,654
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
F-11
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, after eliminating material intercompany balances
and transactions.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the company considers all highly
liquid debt investments purchased with original maturities of three months or
less and money market accounts to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 1996,
substantially all funds are held at one financial institution. The company does
not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on cash equivalents.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
As of December 31, 1995, marketable equity securities were categorized as
available for sale and as a result were stated at fair value. These securities
were held for noncurrent uses, such as capital expenditures, business expansion
or acquisitions and therefore were classified as long-term assets. Unrealized
holding losses were included as a component of stockholders' equity until
realized.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The company's policy is to depreciate the cost of property and equipment over
the estimated useful lives of the assets as indicated in the following
tabulation by use of accelerated methods.
Years
-----
Equipment 5
Furniture 7
Test equipment 5
Property under capital lease
Equipment 5
Furniture 3
Accumulated amortization for the assets under capital lease amounted to $5,880
as of December 31, 1996.
F-12
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
LOSS PER SHARE
Loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the year (Note 2).
COMMON STOCK SPLIT
In November 1994, the board of directors authorized a three-for-one stock split
of common shares effective immediately, which resulted in an increase of
authorized shares from 1,000,000 as of December 31, 1993 to 10,000,000 as of
December 31, 1994. All loss per share and share amounts, other than those
otherwise described, included in these financial statements have been adjusted
for the stock split and merger described in Note 2.
INTANGIBLES
Legal fees incurred for patents and trademarks allowed and/or pending have been
capitalized. The company has received approval for several patents and certain
trademarks which are being amortized over 5 years, which is management's current
estimate of their useful lives. No amortization is being taken on patents and
trademarks not yet issued as of December 31, 1996.
MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and stockholder loans are a
reasonable estimate of their fair value. Investment securities are carried at
their fair value. The minimum royalty obligation is carried at its contractual
value, with an estimated fair value of approximately $400,000 based upon an
annual interest factor of 8%.
F-13
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
During 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" (SFAS No. 123). The company has adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, when the company grants stock options
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date
of grant, no compensation expense is recorded.
NOTE 2 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The company was formed in Chicago, Illinois in May 1990. The company is a
development stage enterprise and was founded to develop an electronic device
(ED) capable of adding modem, video data and telephone features to an ordinary
television receiver over a telephone line. The company is also in the process
of developing the Universal Internet Television Interface (UITI), which is
strictly an internet access product using the customer's television set and
phone line. The company is seeking to license the UITI and ED technologies to
OEMs to be built into television sets. In 1995, the ED had reached the
demonstration stage. The company is seeking partners with software capabilities
to utilize the ED technology.
On November 28, 1995, the company merged with Global Telephone and
Communications, Inc. (GTCI) and reorganized under Section 368(a)(1)(B) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Pursuant to the merger, four shares of GTCI stock were
exchanged for every share of Viscorp stock, resulting in the stockholders of the
former Viscorp retaining voting control over the merged entity. Accordingly,
for accounting purposes, the acquisition has been treated as a recapitalization
of Viscorp with Viscorp as the acquiror (reverse acquisition).
Upon completion of the reorganization, GTCI changed its name to Viscorp. Pro
forma results of operations have not been presented because the effects of this
acquisition were not significant.
F-14
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 3 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
1996 1995
-------- --------
Cash $ 8,553 $ 8,547
Money market funds* 101 731,383
-------- --------
$ 8,654 $739,930
-------- --------
-------- --------
*At cost (which approximates fair value)
NOTE 4 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities classified as noncurrent assets as of December 31, 1995
include marketable equity securities with a cost of $629,688, gross unrealized
losses of $345,313 and an estimated fair value of $284,375.
On March 22, 1996, the stockholders of Digital Sciences, Inc. approved the
acquisition of Digital Sciences, Inc. by Resource Finance Group Ltd. Digital
Sciences, Inc. merged into DSI Acquisition Corp., a newly formed, wholly owned
subsidiary of Resource Finance Group Ltd. On April 1, 1996, Resource Finance
Group Ltd. merged into Intelligent Decision Systems Inc. (IDSI), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Resource Finance Group Ltd. Each Digital Sciences, Inc. common
share was converted into one common share of IDSI. The company's per share
carrying value for these shares is $1.14 as of December 31, 1995, reflecting a
35% discount from its trading value, as the shares were not yet registered. In
November 1996, the company agreed to transfer all of its shares of IDSI stock to
a stockholder in exchange for the cancellation of a loan of $500,000 made by
such stockholder to the company in October 1996. The company recognized a loss
of $129,688 on this transfer.
F-15
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 5 - INTANGIBLES
Intangible assets consist of the following:
1996 1995
--------- ---------
Patents and patents pending $ 87,895 $ 80,194
Trademark and trademarks pending 23,159 17,105
--------- ---------
111,054 97,299
Less accumulated amortization (24,426) (2,704)
--------- ---------
$ 86,628 $ 94,595
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE
1996 1995
--------- ---------
Note payable to stockholder, including
accrued interest of 8%, payable on demand $ 543,618 $ 234,394
Note payable to stockholder, including accrued
interest of 8%, payable on demand 109,335 -
Note payable, including accrued interest of
12%, payable June 30, 1997* 106,082 -
Capital lease obligation, payable in monthly
installments of $846.16, including interest
at an annual rate of 36.7%, due February 6,
1999 15,403 -
Capital lease obligation, payable in monthly
installments of $211.81, including interest at
an annual rate of 14.5%, due May 1, 2001 8,143 -
Capital lease obligation, payable in monthly
installments of $431.65, including interest at
an annual rate of 12.3%, due February 13, 2001 17,074 -
--------- ---------
Total long-term debt 799,655 234,394
Less current maturities (769,790) (234,394)
--------- ---------
$ 29,865 $ -
--------- ---------
--------- ---------
* Prior to the due date, the company will issue 160,000 shares of common
stock in full satisfaction of this debt.
F-16
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 6 - NOTES PAYABLE (Continued)
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease payments under
capital leases together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments
as of December 31, 1996:
Year Ending December 31:
1997 $ 18,941
1998 17,875
1999 9,414
2000 7,722
2001 1,922
--------
Total Minimum Lease Payments 55,874
Less amount representing interest (15,254)
--------
Present Value of Net Minimum
Lease Payments $ 40,620
--------
--------
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON STOCK
In November 1994, the company issued 640,000 shares of common stock at $.625 per
share in exchange for the cancellation of a loan from a stockholder. The
difference between the stated value of the common stock ($400,000) and the
balance of the stockholder loan ($2,069,361) was recorded as additional paid-in
capital. The conversion was not part of the original terms of the loan. The
transaction was an extinguishment of debt between the company and a principal
stockholder and as such was accounted for as a capital transaction.
In November 1994, the company entered into an agreement with a placement agent
for a private offering. This private offering resulted in the sale of 2,000,000
units at a purchase price of $.625 per unit for a total consideration of
$1,250,000. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock, one class A
warrant and one class B warrant. The placement agent received 200,000 shares of
common stock and 48,000 expense units valued at $155,000 as compensation for its
services and costs. Each expense unit was composed of one share of common
stock, one class A warrant and one class B warrant. In addition, attorney and
finder's fees totaling $83,833, paid or to be paid in cash, were incurred and
are included as stock issuance costs. Of the $83,833, $50,000 was payable at
December 31, 1994 to one consultant. In addition, the consultant was granted an
option, exercisable until March 8, 1998, for the purchase of 80,000 shares of
common stock at the exercise price of $.625 per share. During 1995, the company
and the consultant revised the fee structure. In exchange for the cancellation
of the $50,000 obligation and the option to purchase
F-17
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON STOCK (Continued)
80,000 shares, the consultant received $25,000 in cash, 40,000 shares of common
stock with a deemed value of $25,000 and an option, which is exercisable until
November 27, 2000, for the purchase of 120,000 shares at the price of $.625 per
share. In both cases, the options granted to purchase common stock were
assigned a fair value of $0 and were accounted for accordingly.
Each class A warrant entitled the registered holder to purchase one share of
common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 at any time on or before March 1,
1995. Each class B warrant entitled the registered holder to purchase one share
of common stock at an exercise price of $1.88 at any time on or before April 30,
1995. None of the class A warrants were exercised by the March 1, 1995
expiration date, nor were any class B warrants exercised by the April 30, 1995
expiration date.
During 1995, the company entered into an agreement with Dextro Establishment,
located in Liechtenstein in Europe to raise equity financing solely from
offshore purchasers and purchasers who may be deemed "accredited investors" as
those terms are generally defined under Regulation S and Regulation D,
respectively, promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. A
total of 4,400,000 shares of the company's stock were issued at a purchase price
of $.625 per share for a total of $2,750,000. The placement agent received
finder's fees totaling $330,000 which are included as stock issuance costs.
Prior to signing the agreement with Dextro, the company was able to raise
$285,000 through the issuance of 212,000 shares at a purchase price of $1.25 per
share and $20,000 through the issuance of 32,000 shares at a purchase price of
$.625 per share.
In addition, an officer of the company and outside consultants received 600,000
and 66,000 shares, respectively, during 1995 as payment for services rendered,
valued at the price of $.625 per share. Shares of common stock issued for other
than cash have been assigned amounts equivalent to the fair value of the service
or assets received in exchange.
In February 1996, the company raised $50,000 through the issuance of 20,000
shares of common stock. In addition, from March 1 through April 11, 1996, the
company raised $1,000,000 through the issuance of 500,000 shares of common stock
and $250,000 through the exercise of 400,000 options at a price of $.625 per
share which were convertible into 400,000 shares. The options were issued in
connection with fund raising activities and were valued at $2,800,000, the
difference between the fair value of the common stock at the date the options
were granted and the exercise price of the options. This amount is included as
stock issuance costs in the statement of stockholders' equity.
F-18
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON STOCK (Continued)
Although the options have been exercised, the shares have not yet been issued.
These shares have been included in the computation of earnings per share.
On February 5, 1996, the stockholders and the Board of Directors approved an
increase in the number of authorized common shares from 25,000,000 to
50,000,000.
PREFERRED STOCK
In December 1996, the company entered into an agreement with a placement agent,
Wincap, Ltd., to raise equity financing solely from non-U.S. persons as defined
in Regulation S promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
through a private offering of the company's 8% cumulative convertible preferred
stock, $.01 par value per share. The company offered a minimum of 2,000,000 and
a maximum of 6,666,667 shares of the 8% preferred stock for consideration of
between $3,000,000 and $10,000,000. The offering period expires June 30, 1997.
On March 6, 1997, $3,047,748 was raised through the issuance of 2,031,832 shares
of preferred stock. The company received a net amount of $2,691,246 after
deducting the placement agent's fees of $356,502.
Each preferred stockholder is entitled to receive quarterly dividends on the
last day of March, June, September and December in an amount equal to 8% per
annum of the par value of the preferred stock. Dividends totaling $53,030 were
paid on March 31, 1997.
Preferred stockholders will have the right to convert each share into one share
of common stock as follows: a) 25% of the shares 90 days following the date
the shares were purchased (the initial conversion date) and b) 25% of the shares
at the end of each of the three consecutive 90-day periods following the initial
conversion date.
For every two shares purchased, the stockholder will receive one warrant (which
shall expire three years after the date of execution of the subscription
agreement) to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00
per share (the preferred stock warrants). The preferred stock warrants shall
become exercisable in the same increments and on the same dates that the
conversion rights with respect to the shares to which they are attached become
vested, as described in the immediately preceding paragraph.
From and after six months after the date of issuance of the shares, the company
shall have the option to require the preferred stockholder to convert each of
such shares into one share of common stock. Upon such conversion, all of the
preferred stock warrants attached to such shares shall become fully exercisable.
F-19
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
The company has recorded deferred compensation for the difference between the
price of options granted and the fair value of the company's common stock.
Deferred compensation is amortized to expense during the vesting period of the
related options.
NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES
The company had elected to be taxed as an S corporation under provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions, the company did not pay federal
and state corporate income taxes on its taxable income but was responsible for
state replacement taxes. The election was terminated effective November 12,
1994.
Significant components of the company's deferred tax assets as of December 31,
1996 and 1995 are as follows:
1996 1995
---------- ----------
Deferred Tax Assets
Net operating loss carryforwards $3,374,800 $1,330,100
Compensation related to granting
of stock options 1,170,800 -
---------- ----------
Total Deferred Tax Assets 4,545,600 1,330,100
Valuation Allowance (4,545,600) (1,330,100)
---------- ----------
Net Deferred Tax Assets $ - $ -
---------- ----------
---------- ----------
F-20
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES (Continued)
The company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8,436,900 for
federal and Illinois tax return purposes that may be offset against future
taxable income. If not used, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
Operating
Losses
----------
2009 $1,076,200
2010 2,249,000
2011 5,111,700
----------
$8,436,900
----------
----------
Because of the uncertainty associated with future realization of the deferred
tax assets, the deferred tax asset of approximately $4,545,600 has been offset
in total by a valuation allowance.
Principal reasons for variations between the statutory federal rate and the
effective rates were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate 34.00% 34.00% 34.00%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit 4.71 4.71 4.71
Permanent differences regarding compensation - - 17.85
S Corporation income - - (25.29)
Valuation allowance (38.71) (38.71) (32.01)
Other - - .74
------ ------ ------
-% -% -%
------ ------ ------
------ ------ ------
</TABLE>
F-21
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 9 - RENTAL ARRANGEMENTS
The company entered into one-year leases for its office facilities. The lease
for one of its offices is with a significant stockholder. Effective March 1,
1996, the company entered into a one-year lease with a nonrelated party at an
annual rental of $43,960. In 1996, the company was charged $8,000 for lab
facilities in the home of one of its officers in Pennsylvania. Effective April
1, 1997, the company entered into a nine-month lease for office space in
Calabasas, California for $2,983 per month. Total rental expense for all
operating leases, except those with terms of one month or less that were not
renewed, was $47,672, $8,400 and $15,650 for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, respectively. The amount of related party rent expense included
above was $11,400, $8,400 and $9,100 for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995
and 1994, respectively.
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Through December 31, 1995, the company had entered into separate employment
agreements with four of its officers. The agreements for the four officers
expire November 11, 1997, and automatically renew for an additional one-year
period unless the company or the employees notify the other party not less than
120 days prior to the expiration of the agreement of the company's or the
employees' intent to let the agreement expire. One of the officers resigned on
January 8, 1997, but the remaining terms and conditions of his employment
agreement shall remain in full force as they relate to his continuing
obligations. The agreements for two of the officers were terminated by the
Board of Directors effective March 15, 1997.
During 1996, the company entered into separate employment agreements with three
of its officers and one employee. All agreements expire in 1998 and do not
automatically renew. The agreements for two of the officers were terminated
August 6, 1996 and January 27, 1997, respectively.
All of the above agreements included the granting of stock options to purchase
common stock. See Note 11.
F-22
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LITIGATION
In December 1994, a former director and officer of the company filed a lawsuit
in the California Superior Court. This lawsuit was subsequently removed to the
United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
second amended complaint dated April 30, 1996 alleges multiple claims including
breach of fiduciary duty, breach of oral agreement, wrongful termination
of employment, interference with contract, breach of employment agreement and
fraudulent misrepresentation, all arising out of the plaintiff's employment over
a period of 2-1/2 months as the company's president, the termination of his
employment and the aborted negotiations for a proposed merger between the
company and the plaintiff's company. Damages claimed are in excess of
$10,000,000 for failure to transfer approximately 4,000,000 shares of the
company's stock allegedly promised to the plaintiff, salary and expenses arising
out of his employment relationship and punitive damages. The dollar amount of
damages claimed its dependent upon the current per share price of the company's
stock.
The company has filed a claim against the plaintiff for fraud, breach of
fiduciary duty, declaratory relief, rescission and negligent interference with
prospective business advantage arising out of the same set of occurrences as the
plaintiff's complaint. The company's first summary adjudication motion,
challenging the plaintiff's claim for failure to transfer approximately
4,000,000 shares of company stock, was granted by the District Court on August
29, 1996, thus precluding the plaintiff from recovering any shares of stock from
the company. Although this claim has been dismissed, the plaintiff filed a
motion for reconsideration, which was heard by the District Court on October 11,
1996. On December 6, 1996, the District Court denied the plaintiff's motion for
reconsideration. The company filed a summary adjudication motion against the
plaintiff on all his remaining claims, which also was heard by the District
Court on October 11, 1996. On December 6, 1996, the court granted the company's
summary adjudication motion and dismissed all of the plaintiff's remaining
claims. It remains possible that the summary adjudication orders could be
overturned on appeal. Should the orders be overturned, and should the plaintiff
prevail on these claims, the company may be materially adversely affected by the
outcome.
The company filed a lawsuit against three individuals formerly associated with
the company and the corporation which currently employs each of the foregoing
individuals on July 25, 1996 in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California. The company's complaint alleges
misappropriation of trade secrets, conversion and breach of fiduciary duty
arising out of the individual defendants' previous confidential relationships
with the company, access to proprietary information including the technology,
hardware design, software parts selection, feature set and architecture of the
ED technology and subsequent transmittal of this proprietary information
F-23
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LITIGATION (Continued)
to the defendant corporation for its beneficial use. The company is seeking
declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages. The defendants
filed various counterclaims against the company on September 13, 1996 alleging
intentional interference with economic advantage, intentional interference with
contractual relations and unfair competition arising out of the same set of
occurrences. The defendants are seeking damages for lost profits, injury to
business reputation, diminution of value of proprietary data, loss of customers
and loss of investments. In addition, the defendants are seeking a declaratory
judgment of no misappropriation of trade secrets, injunctive relief and punitive
damages.
On March 27, 1997, a company that was engaged to provide investment banking,
corporate finance and financial advisory services filed a civil lawsuit against
the company. The complaint alleges breach of contract and is claiming damages
in the amount of $463,237. The company believes the claim is without merit and
intends to vigorously defend itself against the actions.
The company has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, which motion was
heard by the District Court on October 25, 1996. On December 4, 1996, the
District Court granted the company's motion and issued a preliminary injunction
against the defendants. The injunction enjoins the defendants, during the
pendency of the action, from using any of the company's trade secrets or
technology. Because the lawsuit is still in the discovery stage, it is not
possible to determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the
defendants' counterclaims. However, if the defendants succeeded on their
counterclaims, and were awarded significant monetary damages, and/or injunctive
or declaratory relief against the company, the company could be materially
adversely affected. The company believes the allegations in the defendants'
counterclaims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against
the actions.
An additional lawsuit was filed against the company by a former officer and
another individual formerly associated with the company on December 20, 1996 in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The
complaint alleges multiple claims including breach of contract, fraud, negligent
misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, wrongful termination and
conversion, all arising out of the plaintiffs' employment with the company
during 1995. Damages claimed are for failure to transfer 400,000 shares of the
company's stock and 284,000 options to purchase the company's stock allegedly
promised to each of the plaintiffs, lost profits and business opportunities
arising out of the employment relationships and punitive damages. The dollar
amount of damages claimed is dependent upon the current per share price of the
company's stock.
F-24
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 10 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
LITIGATION (Continued)
Because the lawsuit has not yet reached the discovery stage, it is not possible
to determine the probable likelihood of an adverse ruling on the plaintiffs'
claims. However, if the plaintiffs succeeded on their claims, and were awarded
significant monetary damages against the company, the company could be
materially adversely affected. Although the company has not had enough time to
respond to the complaint, the company intends to vigorously defend itself
against the action.
NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTIONS
In November 1994, the company, pursuant to employment agreements, granted
options to purchase 1,002,400 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$.625 per share. These options were issued to officers of the company. Options
to purchase 212,800 shares of the common stock were immediately vested with the
balance of the options vesting over a two-year period commencing February 1,
1995. These options will expire in November 2004. None of these options were
exercised during 1994, so 1,002,400 options to purchase shares of common stock
were outstanding as of December 31, 1994.
In September 1995, the company adopted a stock option plan that reserved a total
of 2,400,000 shares of authorized, but unissued shares of common stock. Options
under the plan may be granted to employees and/or parties who render services to
the company. The final date on which options could be granted was September 30,
1996. All options expire on June 30, 2001 if not previously exercised. During
1995, 525,200 options were granted to employees under the stock option plan at
an exercise price of $.625 per share. No options under the plan were exercised
during 1995.
In December 1995, an additional 200,000 options were granted to an officer under
the stock option plan at an exercise price of $.625.
In addition, during September 1995, 440,000 stock options were granted to
parties under various settlement agreements at an exercise option of $.625 per
share. These options under the settlement agreements expire in September 2000.
None of these options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 1995.
In January 1996, the company granted options to purchase 170,000 shares of
common stock to various individuals at an exercise price of $.625 per share
under the company's stock option plan. All options expire October 1, 2000. No
options were exercised during 1996.
F-25
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)
In March 1996, the company granted 400,000 options for services rendered in
connection with fund raising activities.
In May 1996 and September 1996, the company, pursuant to employment agreements,
granted options to purchase 575,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price
of $.625 per share. These options were issued to three officers and an employee
of the company. Options to purchase 100,000 shares of the common stock were
immediately vested with the balance of the options vesting over a two-year
period. Options to purchase these shares will expire as follows: 25,000 shares
in April 1997, 50,000 shares in May 1997, 250,000 shares in May 2001 and 250,000
shares in September 2001.
Effective May 6, 1996, the company established a nonemployee directors' stock
option plan whereby each person who is elected as a director and constitutes an
eligible participant shall be granted an option on the effective date of his/her
becoming an eligible participant to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock.
Each person who is subsequently re-elected to a second and third term will be
granted an option to purchase an additional 25,000 and 50,000 shares,
respectively. The option period of each option shall be five years, and the
price per share of the common stock purchasable under an option shall be the
fair market value as of the grant date. During 1996, three directors were
elected with each receiving 25,000 options. Effective March 15, 1997, the Board
of Directors amended the plan, entitling each outside director to receive 40,000
options quarterly which will vest on the following dates: March 15, 1997; June
15; 1997; September 15, 1997; December 15, 1997; and March 15, 1998. The
exercise price of each option will be the average bid price for the 90 days
immediately preceding the vesting. If a director should resign, options will be
awarded according to the above schedule through the closing date of the quarter
in which he/she submits the resignation. The company reserved 300,000 shares of
authorized, but unissued shares of common stock for this plan.
The company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. Had
compensation cost for these options been determined based on their fair value at
the date of grant consistent with the method of accounting prescribed by SFAS
No. 123, the company's net loss and loss per share would have been increased by
$180,000 or $.01 per share and $170,000 or $.01 per share in 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The pro forma effect on the company's 1996 and 1995 net income is
not indicative of the pro forma effect in future years, because it does not take
into consideration the pro forma expense related to grants made prior to 1995.
F-26
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)
The fair value of options granted during 1996 and 1995 has been estimated using
the Black-Scholes pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions
were used in determining fair value:
1996 1995
---- ----
Expected life (in years) 3 3
Risk-free interest rate 6.5 6.5
Volatility factor 20% 20%
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the various stock
option arrangements:
Options Exercise Price
Outstanding per Share
----------- --------------
Balance as of December 31, 1993 - $ -
Granted 1,002,400 0.625
Exercised - -
Canceled - -
---------
Balance as of December 31, 1994 1,002,400 0.625
Granted 1,165,200 0.625
Exercised - -
Canceled - -
---------
Balance as of December 31, 1995 2,167,600 0.625
Granted 1,145,000 0.625
Granted (immediately exercisable) 75,000 10.5625 - 11
Exercised (400,000) 0.625
Canceled - -
---------
Balance as of December 31, 1996 2,987,600 0.625 - 11
---------
---------
As of December 31, 1996, options to purchase 2,512,600 shares of common stock
were exercisable.
F-27
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 11 - STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)
Number of Options Weighted Average Weighted Average
Granted Exercise Price Fair Value of Options
----------------- ---------------- ---------------------
1996
----
1,145,000 (1) $0.625 $8.30
75,000 (2) 10.71 2.46
---------
1,220,000
---------
---------
1995
----
1,165,200
---------
--------- 0.625 .15
(1) Grant price is less than fair value of shares on grant date.
(2) Grant price is equal to fair value of shares on grant date.
The company made a fourth quarter adjustment that reduced compensation expense
for 1996 by approximately $748,000 to correct an error in its previously
recorded calculation.
NOTE 12 - LICENSE FEE INCOME
In January 1995, the company entered into a license agreement with Digital
Sciences, Inc. to license the ED technology and services and received an initial
license fee paid in the form of 250,000 shares of Digital Sciences, Inc. common
stock. The shares received on February 27, 1995 had a trading price of $968,750
and a fair value of $629,688, reflecting a 35% discount from trading price, as
the shares were not yet registered (the "Digital Stock"). The company
recognized this stock receipt as income during 1995 as all the requirements of
the company under the agreement were completed during the year. In addition,
Digital Sciences, Inc. will pay a license fee based on a percentage of gross
revenue derived from the use of the ED technology and services. The company did
not receive any such license fees in 1996 and 1995.
NOTE 13 - LICENSE FEE EXPENSE
In 1994, as part of an agreement with NTN Communications, Inc. (NTN), the
company incurred and expensed a license fee of $250,000. Of this fee, $200,000
was paid in 1994, with the remainder due on March 31, 1997. The remainder was
not paid as of March 31, 1997. The company is currently negotiating an
extension for payment. The initial term of the agreement expires December 13,
2001. Unless terminated, in accordance with the terms of the agreement,
F-28
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 13 - LICENSE FEE EXPENSE (Continued)
the agreement will be extended for a period of seven years. The company has a
nonexclusive worldwide license to promote, market and develop an online computer
service (service), which will be provided by NTN, for use with the company's
product. The technology of the service provides two-way interactive
computerized games that are broadcast to multiple locations, can be played by
multiple participants at each location and allow the retrieval and processing of
data entered by the participants. The company is required to pay usage
royalties as defined in the agreement.
NOTE 14 - AMIGA
In January 1996, the company finalized an agreement with Amiga Technologies GmbH
(Amiga), a German company, for a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to the
Amiga computer operating system technology. The initial term of the agreement
expires December 26, 1998. Unless terminated, in accordance with the terms of
the agreement, the agreement is to be renewable for subsequent three-year
periods at the licensee's option. In January 1996, the company paid an initial
royalty deposit of $450,000 to Amiga. The company is required to pay usage
royalties as defined in the agreement.
On July 18, 1996, the company entered into an agreement with Amiga (the "Amiga
Agreement") to acquire certain assets of Amiga (the "Amiga Assets"). The Amiga
Assets would be acquired by the company from the bankruptcy estate of Escom
Beteiligungs GmbH (a former manufacturer and distributor of IBM compatible
computers throughout Europe) (the "bankruptcy estate of Escom"). The Amiga
Agreement was canceled during the beginning of the fourth quarter of 1996
because the company was unable to secure the necessary financing to consummate
the transaction.
Although the Amiga Agreement was canceled, the company intends to continue its
use of the Amiga computer operating system in accordance with the provisions of
its December 1995 licensing agreement with Amiga.
To date no usage royalties have been paid by the company. However, per the
terms of the agreement, the company is required to pay a minimum royalty of
$900,000 to Amiga or its successors. This amount is due on the earliest of the
following dates: 1) twelve months after the day of the start of distribution
of the licensed product (as defined in the agreement), 2) termination of the
original term of the agreement (December 28, 1996), or 3) an earlier
termination date as provided for in the agreement. The company has recorded an
additional long-term liability in the amount of $450,000 for the unpaid portion
of the minimum royalty and has expensed an additional $450,000 in the fourth
quarter of the year ended December 31, 1996.
F-29
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 15 - UNCERTAINTY - GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the company
will continue as a going concern. The company continues to be a development
stage enterprise and to date has not generated any revenues from product sales
or positive cash flows from operations. The ultimate success of the company is
dependent upon its ability to complete the development of its products and
technology and to successfully introduce its products to the consumer
marketplace. This development and introduction must be accomplished during a
period in which competing technologies and products are rapidly evolving and are
already available to consumers. The company must also be able to raise
significant additional capital in debt or equity markets for both the
development and introduction described above and also to sustain the day-to-day
operations of the company. All of the above factors raise substantial doubt
about the company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
NOTE 16 - OTHER SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The company's president resigned on January 8, 1997. The resignation relates to
his position as officer and director of the company and any of the company's
wholly owned subsidiaries. The Board of Directors approved a severance
agreement which includes the former president and a consultant who performed
various services for the company. The severance agreement provides that the
company shall reimburse the former president and the consultant for reasonable
expenses associated with the company's business incurred by them up to an amount
approximately equal to $300,000 upon submission to the company of valid
documentation which must be approved by the company. The amount of expenses
currently claimed is $255,350.
The company has recorded a liability of $300,000. This liability has been
reduced by $96,478, which represents amounts loaned to the former president by
the company.
NOTE 17 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The company made advances to stockholders of $116,478 and $57,908 during 1996
and 1995, respectively. The 1995 amount, which was originally intended to be
recovered, was forgiven during the year in which it was advanced and accounted
for as compensation expense in 1995.
F-30
<PAGE>
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 18 - NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES AND OTHER CASH FLOW
INFORMATION
The company incurred a liability of $300,000 in 1996 as a result of a severance
agreement with the former president and a consultant.
Capital lease obligations of $46,590 were incurred when the company entered into
leases for new furniture and equipment in 1996.
The company recorded deferred compensation of $6,640,625 in connection with the
granting of options in 1996.
A stockholder received investment securities in full satisfaction of a note
payable for $500,000.
Cash payments of interest amounted to $15,877 in 1996.
NOTE 19 - RECLASSIFICATION
For comparability, the 1995 and 1994 financial statements reflect
reclassifications where appropriate to conform to the financial statement
presentation used in 1996.
F-31
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE B-1
VISCORP
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
Consolidated Other General and Administrative Expenses
Years Ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and
Period from May 1, 1990 (Inception) through December 31, 1996
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Period from
May 1, 1990
(Inception)
through
December 31,
1996 1995 1994 1996
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Salaries 328,086 $ 224,391 $ 72,427 $ 829,542
Payroll taxes 27,650 10,887 3,338 41,875
Equipment rental 171 - 722 893
Advertising - - 69 46,545
Business plan 1,290 39,141 2,500 42,931
Accounting 86,497 59,811 46,920 222,753
Automobile - - 14,159 37,773
Depreciation and amortization 41,256 8,161 3,235 94,648
Dues and subscriptions 2,525 - 1,621 7,145
Delivery 14,724 - 4,994 19,718
Office 9,651 25,812 2,489 44,563
Miscellaneous 36,175 26,820 12,152 86,020
Promotion 100,572 16,372 15,318 195,306
Repair and maintenance 7,159 1,344 131 12,034
Rent and utilities 58,334 210 6,869 97,565
Bank charges - 486 479 2,350
Insurance 143,030 19,016 2,125 164,171
Telephone 86,854 58,840 34,372 224,175
Printing - - 5,406 20,229
Bad debts - - - 11,509
Bad debts - Other - 25,000 - 25,000
Directors' fee 59,000 37,500 4,500 101,000
Outside services - - 98,522 98,522
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total (Exhibit B) $1,002,974 $ 553,791 $ 332,348 $2,426,267
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
</TABLE>
See independent auditor's report regarding supplemental information.
F-32
<PAGE>
F-33
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996
<CASH> 8,654
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 20,000
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 59,132
<PP&E> 127,522
<DEPRECIATION> 36,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 242,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 2,545,323
<BONDS> 0
0
0
<COMMON> 221,280
<OTHER-SE> (3,004,166)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 242,302
<SALES> 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 0
<CGS> 0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 7,885,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 130,756
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 47,618
<INCOME-PRETAX> (8,056,918)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (8,056,918)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (8,056,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>