BASE TEN SYSTEMS INC
S-3/A, 1997-06-19
SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVAGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL SYS
Previous: AVEMCO CORP, 15-12B, 1997-06-19
Next: BBN CORP, 8-K, 1997-06-19



<PAGE>



As Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 1997
                                                     Registration No. 333-21923
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

   
                            AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO
    

                                   FORM S-3

                             REGISTRATION STATEMENT
                                     UNDER
                           THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


                             BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                 <C>
                    NEW JERSEY                                          22-1804206
         (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OR                             (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
          INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)                           IDENTIFICATION NO.)
              ONE ELECTRONICS DRIVE                                       08619
               TRENTON, NEW JERSEY                                      (ZIP CODE)
             (Address of registrant's
           principal executive offices)

</TABLE>
 
 
                               MYLES M. KRANZLER
                             BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.
                              ONE ELECTRONIC DRIVE
                               TRENTON, NJ 08619
                                 (609-586-7010)
                    (Name and address of agent for service)


    Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Sale to the Public: From time
to time following the effective date of this Registration Statement
 
    If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans please check the following
box: / /
 
    If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
 a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest
 reinvestment plans, check the following box: /x/



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<S>                  <C>                            <C>                 <C>                         <C>
Title of Each             Amount                   Proposed Maximum       Proposed Maximum       Amount of
Class of Securities       to be                    Offering Price             Aggregate         Registration
to be Registered         Registered                 Per Unit (1)           Offering Price (1)      Fee
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Class A Common Stock,      340,000                    $10.75                 $3,655,000          $1,260.36
$1.00 par value

Class A Common Stock,
$1.00 par value            800,000                    $10.375                $8,300,000          $2,862.10

Class A Common Stock,
$1.00 par value             80,000                    $10.125                $  810,000          $  279.31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total Fee                                                                                        $4,122.46

</TABLE>





     (1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the amount of the
registration fee and, pursuant to Rule 457(b), based on the average of the 
high and low sales prices of the Common Stock, as reported on the Nasdaq 
National Market on, May 20, 1997.



    THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATES AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID
SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<PAGE>


   
                    SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JUNE 19, 1997
    


PROSPECTUS



                               1,220,000 Shares

                             BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.

                              CLASS A COMMON STOCK





    All 1,220,000 shares (the "Shares") of Class A Common Stock 
("Class A Common Stock"), of Base Ten Systems, Inc., a New Jersey corporation 
(the "Company" or "Base Ten"), offered hereby are being offered by certain 
stockholders of the Company (the "Selling Stockholders", including one 
directors). The Shares may be offered by the Selling Stockholders from time 
to time in open market transactions, negotiated transactions, principal 
transactions or by a combination of these methods of sale. See "Plan of 
Distribution."
 



    The Shares offered for sale hereby are issuable or have been issued to the 
Selling Stockholders upon exercise of outstanding warrants at an average 
exercise price of $12.25 and options at an average exercise price of $10.09. 
The Company has agreed to provide certain registration rights to the Selling 
Stockholders. See "Selling Stockholders."
 


    None of the proceeds from the sale of the Shares by the Selling Stockholders
will be received by the Company. Base Ten has agreed to bear all expenses in
connection with the registration and sales of the Shares, other than
underwriting discounts and selling commissions. The Company has also agreed to
indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 


    On June 10, 1997, the last reported sale price of the Class A Common Stock 
on the Nasdaq National Market was $10 1/16. The Class A Common Stock is traded
under the Nasdaq symbol "BASEA."
 


    THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. (SEE "RISK
FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 3.)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------


   
June 19, 1997
    


<PAGE>

                             AVAILABLE INFORMATION
 
    The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance
therewith files reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC"). Reports, proxy material and other information filed by
the Company can be inspected and copied at prescribed rates at the public
reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 450 5th Street, N.W. Judiciary
Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549 and the following Regional Offices of the SEC: 7
World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048 and 500 West Madison
Street, 14th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. Copies of these material can
also be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 450 5th Street,
N.W., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549.

               INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
 
    The following documents filed by the Company with the SEC under the Exchange
Act are incorporated by reference in this Prospectus:
 
    1.  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996
(Commission File No. 0-7100 filed on January 28, 1997.).
 


    2.  Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996
(Commission File No. 0-7100 filed on May 28, 1997).
 


    3.  Proxy Statement dated February 16, 1997 for the Company's Annual Meeting
of Stockholders (Commission File No. 0-7100, Schedule 14A filed on February 16,
1997.). 

    4. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1997
(Commission File No. 0-7100 filed on March 17, 1997.). 

    5. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended January 31, 1997 
(Commission File No. 0-7100 filed on May 28, 1997). 

   
    6. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1997
(Commission File No. 0-7100 filed on June 16, 1997). 

    7. Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 1997 (Commission File No.
0-7100 filed June 9, 1997) reporting the Company's recent private placement or
convertible debentures.

    8. Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 12, 1997 (Commission File No.
0-7100 filed June 13, 1997) reporting the Company's recent transaction where by
it entered into an agreement becomming a minority owner of a limited liability
corporation the name of which is "UPACS LLC".

    9. All documents filed by the Company after the date of
this Prospectus pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act, prior to the filing of a post-effective amendment which indicates that all
Shares offered hereby have been sold or which deregisters any Shares then
remaining unsold. All of these documents will be deemed to be incorporated
herein by reference and to be a part hereof from their respective filing dates.
    

    Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein
or in any other subsequently filed document which also is or is deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes that statement. Any
statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified
or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus.
 
    The Company will provide without charge to each person to whom a Prospectus
Supplement is delivered, upon request, a copy of the documents incorporated by
reference in this Prospectus. Requests should be directed to Base Ten Systems,
Inc., One Electronic Drive, Trenton, New Jersey 08169, Attention: Edward J.
Klinsport (609) 586-7010. Additional copies of the Prospectus are also available
from the Company or the Transfer Agent upon request.

                                       1

<PAGE>

                              SUMMARY INFORMATION
 
    The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the detailed
information and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere or
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus.
 
    Base Ten is engaged in the design and manufacture of electronic systems
employing safety critical software for defense markets and the development of
commercial applications focused on batch processing control, medical screening
and image processing software. The Company also manufactures defense products to
specifications for prime government contractors and designs and builds
proprietary electronic systems for use in secure communications by various U.S.
government agencies.
 
    Specialization in extreme reliability defense products has enabled the
Company to develop expertise in the field of safety critical technology
dedicated to the prevention of performance errors. Operations in this
environment during the last two decades have also provided experience in
developing advanced quality control procedures for products meeting stringent
government standards as well as familiarity with complex government regulations
and agency procedures. Over the last several years, Base Ten has redirected
resources to decrease its historical dependence on defense contracting and has
concentrated on commercial products for highly regulated industries, relying on
the same safety critical techniques developed in its traditional businesses.
While the Company's nondefense programs involve major potential markets, the
resulting products are still primarily developmental and may not succeed in
reaching their potential.

                          DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
 
General.

    The authorized capital stock of Base Ten consists of 22,000,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock, 2,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock and 1,000,000
shares of Preferred Stock, all of which have a par value of $1.00 per share.
 
COMMON STOCK
 
    DIVIDENDS. Both classes of Base Ten's Common Stock have identical cash 
and property dividend rights except that no cash or property dividend may be 
paid on the Class B Common Stock unless a dividend at least equal in amount 
is paid concurrently on the Class A Common Stock. Cash or property dividends 
can be declared and paid on the Class A Common Stock without being declared 
and paid on the Class B Common Stock.
 
    If a distribution is paid in shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock, the distribution may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class
A Common Stock may be paid to holders of shares of Class A Common Stock and
shares of Class B Common Stock may be paid to holders of shares of Class B
Common Stock, and (ii) the same number of shares shall be paid in respect of
each outstanding share of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Base Ten
may not subdivide or combine shares of either class without at the same time
proportionately subdividing or combining shares of the other class.
 
    VOTING RIGHTS.  Holders of Class A Common Stock are entitled to elect 25% of
the members of the Board of Directors (rounded to the next highest whole number)
so long as the number of outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock is at least
10% of the number of outstanding shares of both classes. Currently, the holders
of Class A Common Stock are entitled, as a class, to elect two directors of Base
Ten, and the holders of the Class B Common Stock are entitled, as a class, to
elect the remaining four directors. As a result of this provision, the holders
of a majority of the Class B Common Stock can and will continue to be able to
elect a majority of the directors and thereby control Base Ten, regardless of
the number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding from time to time.
Directors may be removed, only for cause, by the holders of the class of common
stock which elected them.
 
    Except for the election or removal of directors as described above and
except for class votes as required by law or Base Ten's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, holders of both classes of common stock vote or consent as a
single class on all matters, with each share of Class A Common Stock having
one-tenth vote per share and each share of Class B Common Stock having one vote
per share.

                                          2


<PAGE>

    The outstanding shares of the Class A Common Stock currently represents
approximately 94% of the total number of shares of both classes outstanding. If
the number of outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock should becomes less
than 10% of the total number of shares of both classes of common stock
outstanding, the holders of Class A Common Stock would not have the right to
elect 25% of the Board of Directors, but would have one-tenth vote per share for
all directors, and the holders of Class B Common Stock would have one vote per
share for all directors.
 
    CONVERSION.  At the option of the holder of record, each share of Class B
Common Stock is convertible at any time into one share of Class A Common Stock.
Conversion of a significant number of shares of Class B Common Stock into Class
A Common Stock could put control of the Board of Directors into the hands of the
holders of a relatively small equity interest in Base Ten who would continue to
hold the Class B Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock is not convertible.
 
    OTHER RIGHTS.  Shareholders of the Base Ten have no preemptive or other
rights to subscribe for additional shares. On liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of Base Ten, all shareholders, regardless of class, are entitled 
to share ratably in any assets available for distribution. No shares of 
either class are subject to redemption. All outstanding shares are fully paid 
and non-assessable.
 
    TRANSFER AGENT.  The transfer agent and registrar for shares of the Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, 40 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005.
 
PREFERRED STOCK
 
    No shares of preferred stock have been issued. Base Ten's Board of 
Directors is empowered to fix the designations, powers, preferences and 
relative, participating, optional or other special rights of the Preferred 
Stock and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of those 
preferences or rights. The voting rights of the Class B Common Stock 
described above are subject to voting rights that may be granted in 
connection with the creation of any series of Preferred Stock. However, no 
issue of Preferred Stock may change the ratio of one-tenth of a vote for each 
share of Class A Common Stock to one vote for each share of Class B Common 
Stock described above.
 
                                  RISK FACTORS
 
    In addition to the other information included and incorporated by reference
in this Prospectus, the following factors should be carefully considered in
evaluating the Company and an investment in the Common Stock.

*FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
 
    This Risk Factor section contains forward looking information within the
meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements appear in a number of places and can be identified by an "asterisk"
reference to a particular section of the foregoing or by the use of such
forward-looking terminology such as "believe", "expect", "may", "will", "should"
or the negative thereof or variations thereof. Such forward looking statements
involve certain risks and uncertainties, including the particular factors
described in this Risk Factors section. In each case actual results may differ
materially from such forward looking statements. The Company does not undertake
to publicly update or revise its forward looking statements even if experience
or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or
implied) will not be realized.
 
RECURRING LOSSES
 
    The Company experienced net losses of $9.0 million in the year ended October
31, 1996 and $2.0 million in the three months ended January 31, 1997. These
losses resulted primarily from reductions of defense-related revenues,
write-offs and amortization of software development expenditures incurred in
prior periods and expenses relating to marketing and sales of commercial
products. The Company anticipates incurring an additional loss in the second
fiscal quarter of 1997 and could continue to incur losses in subsequent periods.
The Company's ability to achieve profitable operations is dependent upon, among
other things, successful marketing of its manufacturing execution system
products and defense-related design and manufacturing services, cost-effective
development and manufacture of defense-related products, and successful
competition in the markets in which the Company participates. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to attain or maintain profitability.*

                                       3

<PAGE>

LIQUIDITY


 
    During the first quarter ending January 31, 1997, the Company used $1.9
million of cash in its operations. The use of cash for operations was due
primarily to the Company's expenditure of approximately $1.5 million for the
development of its PHARMASYST products and the Company's net loss for the
quarter. Cash used in investing activities during the first quarter of $.2
million was due primarily to the purchase of property, plant and equipment. Net
cash provided from financing activities was attributable to the exercise of
options for the purchase of the Company's common stock. The combined use of cash
from all activities during the quarter was $2.2 million for the reasons 
stated above. At January 31, 1997 the Company's cash and other liquid assets 
were $5.3 million.
 


    The Company recently obtained a $1 million line of credit facility with a
local bank, which expires in February 1998. Interest is 1% above the bank's
prime lending rate and the credit line is collateralized by accounts receivable.
There currently are no amounts outstanding under the credit line.
 

    On May 1, 1997 the Company entered into an agreement whereby it became a 
minority owner of a limited liability company (the "LLC"). Under the terms of 
the agreement, the Company made a capital contribution to the LLC of its rights 
to its uPACS technology which is a system for archiving ultrasound images 
with networking, communciation and off-line measurement capabilities. In 
exchange for such capital contribution, the Company received a 9% interest in 
the LLC. An outside investor made a capital contribution of $2 million and 
agreed to make a further capital contribution of $1 million on or before 
December 1, 1997, in return for a 91% interest in the LLC. The Company 
believes that the funds available under the LLC will be sufficient to fund 
operations in connection with uPACS for approximately eighteen months.* In 
connection with the formation of the LLC, the Company entered into a Services 
and License Agreement whereby the Company has agreed to complete the 
development of the uPACS technology and undertake to market, sell and 
distribute systems using the uPACS technology. The LLC will pay the Company 
its expenses in connection with such services and remit to the LLC royalties 
in connection with the sale of systems using the uPACS technology. At such 
time as the LLC has distributed to the outside investor an aggregate amount 
equal to $4.5 million of its net cash flow, the Company would become a 63% 
owner of the LLC and the outside investor will own a 37% interest in the LLC.
There can be no assurance that uPACS will be sucessful or that the LLC will 
be profitable or that the funds under the LLC will be sufficient for further
development and marketing of uPACS.

    On May 30, 1997, the Company sold 55 units ("Units") at $100,000 per 
Unit, for an aggregate of $5,000,000, to 2 accredited purchasers 
("Purchasers") in a private offering (the "Offering"). Each Unit consisted of 
(i) a convertible debenture ("Convertible Debenture") in the principal amount 
of $100,000 convertible into shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, 
$1.00 par value ("Class A Common Stock"), and (ii) a warrant ("Warrant') to 
acquire 1,800 shares of Class A Common Stock. The number of shares of Class A 
Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Debentures is 
variable. The number of shares will be calculated at the time of conversion 
and will be the lesser of (i) the product obtained by multiplying (x) the 
lesser of the average of the closing bid prices for the Class A Common Stock 
for the (A) five or (B) thirty consecutive trading days ending on the trading 
day immediately preceding the date of determination by (y) a conversion 
percentage equal to 95% with respect to any conversions occurring prior to 
February 24, 1998 and 92% with respect to any conversions occurring on or 
after February 24, 1998 and (ii) $13.50 with respect to any conversions 
occurring prior to May 30, 1998 or (y) $14.00 with respect to any conversions 
occurring on or after May 30, 1998. The Convertible Debentures are not 
convertible prior to December 16, 1997. From December 16, 1997 until February 
23, 1998, one-half of the Convertible Debentures may be converted and after 
February 23, 1998, the Convertible Debentures are fully convertible. The 
Warrants may be exercised at any time through May 30, 2002 at an exercise 
price of $12.26 per share.

    The Company received net proceeds of approximately $4,950,000 from the 
sale of the Units after deduction of fees and expenses related to the 
Offering. In connection with the Offering, transaction fees aggregating 
$293,000 were paid to Tail Wind Inc., the manager of one of the Purchasers, 
for services rendered in its capacity as representative of the Purchasers, 
and advisory fees aggregating $165,000 were paid to Strategic Growth 
International, Inc., the Company's financial consultant. In addition, 
Alexander M. Adelson, a director of the Company, received warrants to 
purchase 27,500 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of 
$10.125 per share and $55,000 for advisory services rendered in connection 
with the Offering.




    The Company believes that cash generated by operations and existing 
capital resources in combination with such credit facility, the funds 
available from the L.L.C., and the net proceeds from the sale of the 
convertible debentures will be sufficient to fund its operations through 
fiscal year end 1997. In addition, the Company is relying on the 
continued successful development of its Medical Technology Division 
leading product, PHARM2, during the third quarter of calendar 1997 
to stimulate new orders and permit the delivery of existing orders. 
If the Company should not receive the currently anticipated orders in time and
in the amounts planned during fiscal 1997 the Company may need to reduce its 
operating costs. The effect of these reductions could have an adverse effect 
in the Company's ability to market, develop, and implement its products with 
the result that the Company may continue to incur losses.*



FLUCTUATIONS IN QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS



     For the quarters ended April 30, 1996, July 31, 1996, October 31, 1996, 
and January 31,1997, the Company's revenues were $3.8 million, $3.0 million, 
$4.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and the Company's operating 
results were $(4.0) million, $(2.4) million, $(1.8) million, and $(1.6) 
million, respectively. Revenues and operating results are subject to 
significant quarterly fluctuations. If, as a result of such fluctuations, the 
Company's operating results in a quarter are below the expectations of public 
market analysts and investors, the price of the Company's Common Stock could 
be materially and adversely affected. Factors that could cause such 
fluctuations include changes in customer capital and resource commitment; 
changes in product mix; the introduction of new products or product 
improvements by the Company or its competitors; FDA regulatory requirements; 
and changes in operating expenses. The timing of revenues from 
defense-related programs can be significantly affected by government 
procurement processes and disruptions due to political and other events over 
which the Company has no control. The timing of revenues from manufacturing 
execution systems can be affected by such factors as long sales cycles and 
delays in customer authorization procedures. In the second quarter of fiscal 
1996, the Company determined that its PHARM2 product had recently become 
standardized. Since most orders for this product did not meet the criteria 
for long-term contract accounting, the Company determined that it should 
recognize revenues from product orders on delivery.*
 


                                       4


<PAGE>



RESTATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
    The Company has restated its consolidated financial statements for the years
ended October 31, 1996 and 1995. Subsequent to the issuance of the Company's
1996 consolidated financial statements, the Company's management determined that
certain temporary salary reductions for certain officers of the Company during
fiscal 1995, and loans made to such officer to be repaid by future bonuses,
should have been recorded as an increase to compensation expense with a
corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital in the Company's 1995
consolidated financial statements. As a result, the Company's 1996 and 1995
consolidated financial statements have been restated from the amounts previously
reported to record these loans as a charge to operations and as an increase to
additional paid-in-capital in fiscal 1995. The impact of these adjustments was
to increase the previously reported 1995 net loss by $502,000 and net loss per
common share by $.07. The restatement had no effect on the Company's cash
position.


 
DEPENDENCE ON PHARMASYST PRODUCTS
 
    The Company believes its potential for long-term growth will depend 
significantly on the success of its PHARMASYST products. The Company has 
devoted substantial resources to the development of PHARMASYST products, 
including $1.5 million that was capitalized and will be amortized over 4 
years commencing in fiscal 1995. The Company has delivered only a limited 
number of PHARMASYST applications. The installation of a manufacturing 
execution system in a manufacturing facility is a complex process involving 
integration with existing hardware platforms, operating systems and other 
existing systems. Once a system is installed, it must undergo testing to 
ensure it operates and performs as defined and required and can undergo 
extended periods of modifications and corrections to meet customer 
requirements, some of which may be at Company expense. The manufacturing 
process, of which a computerized manufacturing execution system (MES) is a 
component, must undergo further testing for validation in accordance with 
defined procedures. Two of the Company's PHARMASYST installations have now 
been validated by the Company's customers. The success of PHARMASYST products 
will depend on the Company's ability to integrate PHARMASYST into other 
manufacturing facilities and the customer's ability to validate its 
manufacturing process. The Company's success will also depend on its ability 
to establish strategic relationships with leading systems integrators and 
other marketing efforts. There can be no assurance that PHARMASYST will 
achieve market acceptance. Failure of PHARMASYST to achieve market acceptance 
would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of 
operations and financial condition.*
 
    The Company is focusing its PHARMASYST-related efforts on developing and
marketing PHARM2. While the first release of PHARM2 has been effected,
additional testing is required to make further releases to complete the desired
functionality. The Company is late on several installation contracts, and, with
the passage of time, may become late on additional contracts. The Company's
customers have the right to cancel contracts in the event the Company fails to
perform. Should the Company be unable to successfully complete the testing of
PHARM2, or if existing or future customers cancel outstanding contracts, the
Company's business, results of operations and financial condition would be
adversely affected.*
 
DEPENDENCE ON DEFENSE CONTRACTING; CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS
 
    The Company is highly dependent upon its defense-related business. In fiscal
1996, and in the first three months of fiscal 1997, 89.5% and 94.0%,
respectively, of the Company's total revenues was derived from such business.
Defense-related contracts are subject to inherent risks relating to governmental
procurement processes and political developments, including reductions in
defense spending of both the U.S. or foreign governments to which the Company
sells, reductions in funds for particular projects, and the ability of
government agencies to terminate contracts or funding. Most of the Company's
defense-related activities are conducted pursuant to subcontracts with prime
defense contractors to government agencies. Profit margins on contracts
involving the U.S. government are subject to restrictions. The termination or 
modification of any project in which the Company participates could have an 
adverse effect on the Company. A substantial portion of the Company's defense 
business has been with two customers, Daimler-Benz AG, Aerospace ("DASA") and 
McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Systems. For the year ended October 31, 1996 and 
the three months ended January 31, 1997, these two customers collectively 
accounted for 46.1% and 67.3%, respectively, of the Company's total revenues. 
Reductions in defense spending, adverse developments in the Company's 
relationship with one or more significant prime contractors, or loss of one 
or more significant contracts would have a material adverse effect on the 
Company's results of operations and financial condition. *

                                       5
<PAGE>



    The Company relies on McDonnell Douglas and Deutsche Aerospace (DASA) as its
two main customers McDonnell Douglas has placed three development contracts with
the Company for electronic systems. The first is for an Interference Blanker
Unit used aboard the F/A-18E/F with potential production contracts over the next
ten to twenty years. The second contract is for the development of a Maintenance
Data Recorder which, in production, is intended to be used aboard the Apache
helicopter for up to 800 aircraft. The third contract involves the development
of an Automatic Target Recognition system to be used aboard the SLAM-ER missile
with potential production of up to 700 missiles. Although the Company believes
it is in a favorable position to receive production contracts related to the
SLAM-ER because of its experience in the development process, there can be no
assurance that the Company will receive any of the above contracts and some or
all of such contracts could be publicly bid.*
 
    The Company has been a supplier to Deutsche Aerospace since 1969 and relies
on this customer for significant business. Deutsche Aerospace is under budget
pressure from the German government and the business has declined significantly
over the past seven years. While there can be no assurance given, the Company is
hoping to receive a contract in the order of $8 million to be placed within
approximately the next twelve months. The failure to secure that contract, in
the absence of equivalent orders from other customers, could adversely affect
the Company's ability to meet its business plan and result in staff reductions
and losses. *
 


Limited Commercial Marketing Experience; Reliance on Third-Party Distribution 
Assistance
 
    The Company has limited experience selling products in commercial markets
and intends to rely on an internal sales force and strategic marketing
relationships. The Company has a limited number of sales people and is in the
process of expanding its sales force. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to identify and hire additional qualified sales people. The Company
also intends to rely substantially on strategic relationships with system
integrators and suppliers of manufacturing automation systems and equipment. The
Company has entered into a limited number of such relationships. To date, no
revenues have been generated from these relationships. Many of these strategic
partners have similar relationships with certain competitors of the Company or
may offer competing products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be
successful in establishing an internal sales force or such relationships, that
any of these third parties will not give higher priority to competing products
or that any such third parties will be successful in selling the Company's
products.*
 
Technological Obsolescence; Changing Requirements for Manufacturing Execution
Software
 
    The markets in which the Company competes are characterized by rapid
technological change. Competitors may develop and market products embodying new
technologies that can render the Company's existing products obsolete and
unmarketable. The market for manufacturing execution software is subject to
changes in customer requirements arising out of, among other things, changes in
manufacturing processes, management information systems, manufacturing resource
planning systems and regulatory requirements. The Company's ability to market
PHARMASYST and any similar future products successfully will depend in part on
its ability to update and improve those products to address technological and
regulatory developments. Any failure by the Company to anticipate or respond
adequately to such developments, or any significant delays in product
improvements or introductions could result in a loss of competitiveness and
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business results of
operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the 
Company will be successful in developing such improvements.*
 
COMPETITION
 


    The markets in which the company competes are intensely competitive. The 
Company believes competition in the manufacturing execution system 
software market is likely to increase substantially for a number of reasons. 
A number of companies offering products for discrete manufacturers have 
announced plans to introduce products designed for process manufacturers. 
Some companies that offer host-based systems have begun to offer or have 
announced plans to introduce client/ server-based systems for process 
manufacturers and to increase the number of hardware platforms on which their 
software operates. Companies addressing complementary customer needs may 
develop or acquire technology to compete. Competitors may merge or establish 
cooperative relationships with each other or with third parties to increase 
their ability to address the needs of the Company's prospective customers. In 
the market for defense-related products, the Company competes with many 
well-established U.S. and foreign manufacturers of weapons control and 
similar equipment, many of whom offer a broader product line to government 
customers and who have established extensive relationships with contracting 
agencies. Many of the Company's competitors are larger and more established 
and may be able to respond more quickly than the Company to new or emerging 
technologies, changes in customer requirements, or regulatory changes, or to 
devote greater resources to developing, promoting and marketing their 
products than can the Company. Increased competition could result in 



                                     6

<PAGE>

price reductions, reductions in gross margins and loss of market share, any 
of which could materially and adversely affect the Company's business, 
results of operations and financial condition. There can be no assurance that 
the Company will compete successfully with existing or new competitors or 
that competitive pressures will not materially and adversely affect the 
Company's business, results of operations, and financial condition.*

MANAGEMENT OF CHANGING BUSINESS
 
    The Company has recently experienced significant changes in its business,
including increased emphasis on developing, producing, marketing and selling
commercial software products. This shift involves the establishment of strategic
marketing relationships and the addition of marketing and technological
personnel for its commercial software products. These changes may place a
significant strain on the Company's management and operations. If the Company
experiences significant growth, it may be required to hire, train and manage
additional, qualified personnel in areas in which the Company does not have
significant experience and may be required to implement improvements to its
operations, financial and management information systems. If the Company is
unable to attract and manage such additional personnel or to implement such
improvements, its business, results of operations and financial condition could
be adversely affected.*
 
PRODUCT DEFECTS; PRODUCT LIABILITY
 
    The Company's products are designed for use in applications in which 
errors or failures could have catastrophic results. The Company's 
defense-related products include weapons control systems intended, among 
other things, to prevent unintended deployment of weapons and disruption of 
combat aircraft performance during weapons deployment. Pharmaceutical 
manufacturing customers will rely on PHARMASYST products for, among other 
things, quality control and compliance with current Good Manufacturing 
Practice (cGMP) and other regulatory requirements. A claim may be made that a 
defect in a PHARMASYST product failed to prevent defects in pharmaceutical 
products, which injured consumers. Certain other products of the Company are 
involved in critical healthcare decision making processes. The Company 
maintains product liability insurance of $5.0 million for commercial products 
and $30.0 million for defense-related products, subject to certain 
deductibles and exclusions. There can be no assurance that the Company's 
existing insurance would be adequate to cover any claims arising out of 
alleged defects or that the Company will be able to obtain and maintain 
adequate insurance coverage in the future.*
 
RELIANCE ON SINGLE SOURCE OF SUPPLY


 
    The Company's manufacturing operations involve the assembly of final 
products from components and subassemblies supplied by other manufacturers. 
The Company relies on single sources of supply for certain components and 
subassemblies that are manufactured to its specifications. There can be no 
assurance that the Company would be able to locate acceptable alternative 
sources of supply on favorable terms or on a timely basis, if any of such 
single sources were to become unable to support the Company's requirements. 
The Company could experience production delays and increased costs if any 
such single sources were to fail to satisfy the Company's requirements and 
the Company were unable to make acceptable alternative arrangements on a 
timely basis. Such delays could have a material adverse effect on the 
Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. *




 
    The Company does not now have any long term contracts with sole suppliers.
The Company relies on VSLI Technology for the supply of Application Specific
Integrated Circuits (ASICs) used in parts to be supplied to Deutsche Aerospace.
The Company also relies on National Hybrid, Intel, White Electronics and Xilinx
for supplying four (4) different integrated circuits that are a part of the
Interference Blanker Unit supplied by the Company to McDonnell Douglas
Aerospace.
 


PROPRIETARY RIGHTS
 
    The Company attempts to protect its proprietary technology with a
combination of copyrights, trademarks, patents, and reliance on trade secret law
and contractual arrangements. Existing copyright and trade secret laws afford
only limited practical protection and customer access to source codes may
increase the possibility of misappropriation or other misuse of the Company's
software. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights
to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. There can be no assurance that the
Company's precautions will be adequate to prevent others from obtaining
information the Company considers proprietary and important to its competitive
position or that others will not independently develop similar technologies.
While the Company does not believe any of its products infringe the rights of
any third parties, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert
claims of infringement against the Company, that 

                                    7

<PAGE>

any such assertion will not result in costly litigation or require the 
Company to obtain licenses to intellectual property rights, or that such 
licenses will be available on reasonable terms, if at all.*
 
DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL


 
    The Company believes its success will depend in large part upon its ability
to attract and retain highly skilled technical, managerial and sales and
marketing personnel, and to retain its personnel with process manufacturing
expertise. Competition for such personnel is intense, and the services of
qualified personnel are difficult to obtain or replace. The Company has from
time to time experienced difficulty in locating candidates with appropriate
qualifications. In particular, the Company has encountered difficulties in
hiring sufficient numbers of technical service personnel. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining the
personnel required to develop, market, service and support its products and
conduct its operations successfully. *




 
    The Company also relies upon its Chairman and CEO, Myles M. Kranzler, the
President of the Government Technology Division, Edward J. Klinsport, the
President of the Medical Technology Division, Alan J. Eisenberg, and the Vice
Presidents of both divisions, the loss of any of whom in the absence of a
suitable replacement, could have a material adverse affect on the Company.
 


FOREIGN TRADE AND CURRENCY EXCHANGE RELATED RISKS


 
    A portion of the Company's revenues is derived from foreign customers and is
subject to disruption by political and economic conditions abroad. Currency
exchange fluctuations could increase the price of the Company's products to
foreign customers or decrease the price of competing foreign products to U.S.
customers. *
 




    The Company has a facility in the United Kingdom which relies on stable
values of the pound sterling. Variations in the value of the pound could affect
the Company's costs either positively or negatively. The Company spends
approximately $1.5 million, or L900,000, annually at the current exchange rate.
 
    The Company has contracts in the United Kingdom in the order of $1.5 million
annually which, except for ancillary services, are denominated in U.S. dollars
and are unaffected by the exchange rates. All other Company contracts are
denominated in U.S. dollars. The Company does not currently engage in any
hedging transactions.
 


DEPENDENCE ON CONTINUATION OF SECURITY CLEARANCES
 
    The Company relies on the continuance of its security clearances and
clearances of certain of its employees from agencies of the United States and
NATO member governments for its defense products. Loss of security clearances by
the Company or certain key personnel could have an immediate and adverse affect
on the Company's business.*
 
DEPENDENCE ON APPROVAL OF PRODUCT EXPORT
 
    The export of certain technology included in the Company's software products
requires advance approval by the Department of Defense. Although the Company has
secured the approvals necessary to export its current products, a change in
government policy or a change in applicable law could prevent marketing of the
Company's products outside of the United States. Similarly, to export certain
medical devices, certain statutory export requirements must be met. For devices
that are lawfully marketed in the United States, export requirements are less
stringent than for devices that are not permissable for marketing in the United
States. Failure to meet statutory export requirements or a change in the law
preventing foreign sales could limit or preclude the ability of the Company to
market its products outside the United States.*
 
CONTROL BY HOLDERS OF CLASS B COMMON STOCK
 
    Holders of the Company's Class B common stock ("Class B Common Stock"), of
which 56% is owned by officers and directors of the Company, are entitled to
elect 75% of the members of the Company's Board of Directors. In addition,
holders of Class B Common Stock are entitled to cast one vote per share of such
stock, compared to one-tenth of one vote per share of Common Stock, on all
matters submitted to the Company's stockholders other than the election of
directors. This would entitle holders of Class B Common Stock to 38% of the
Company's outstanding combined voting power as of January 


                                       8

<PAGE>

2, 1997 on those matters. Holders of Class B Common Stock will continue to be 
entitled to elect 75% of the members of the Board. See "Description of 
Capital Stock."
 
ABSENCE OF DIVIDENDS
 
    The Company has not paid dividends on its Common Stock or its Class B Common
Stock since 1985 and presently intends to retain any future earnings for
reinvestment in its businesses. Accordingly, the Company does not anticipate
paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.*
 
                              SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
 
    The following table sets forth (i) the name of each Selling Stockholder,
(ii) to the best of the Company's knowledge, the total number of shares of Class
A Common Stock owned beneficially by each Selling Stockholder as of the date of
this Prospectus, (iii) the number of Shares to be offered for the account of
each Selling Stockholder in this offering and (iv) to the best of the Company's
knowledge, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock to be owned by each
Selling Stockholder after giving effect to this offering.
 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                      NUMBER OF
                                                                                                      SHARES OF
                                                                                         NUMBER OF   STOCK TO BE
                                                                           NUMBER OF     SHARES TO   OWNED AFTER
                                                                           SHARES OF        BE           THE
NAME                                                                      STOCK OWNED     OFFERED     OFFERING
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------  -----------  -----------
<S>                                                                       <C>           <C>          <C>
Alexander M. Adelson....................................................      445,416       50,000      395,416
Bruce D. Cowen..........................................................      897,450      190,000      707,450
Andrew Sycoff...........................................................      115,000      100,000       15,000
Jesse L. Upchurch.......................................................    1,996,500      800,000    1,196,500
James T. Kelly..........................................................       80,000       80,000            0
                                                                          ------------  -----------  -----------
TOTAL...................................................................    3,534,366    1,220,000    2,314,366
                                                                          ------------  -----------  -----------
                                                                          ------------  -----------  -----------
</TABLE>

    The information set forth in the foregoing table was provided to the 
Company by the Selling Stockholders. None of the Selling Stockholders has had 
any position or other material relationship with the Company or its 
affiliates during the past three years, except that Mr. Adelson has served as 
a director of Base Ten since 1992, Mr. Cowen served as a consultant to the 
Company from 1992 until 1997 and a director from May 1996 until April 1997. 
Mr. Sycoff is an employee of Andrew Garrett, Inc., who assisted the Company in 
arranging financing during 1996. Mr. Upchurch is a private investor. 
Mr. Kelly is a principal of Shamrock Partners, Ltd., which as underwriter in 
connection with the Company's 1992 rights Offering, received a warrant from 
the Company for 80,000 Shares of Class A Common Stock. The Company has been 
advised that Shamrock Partners, Ltd., has assigned such 80,000 Shares to Mr. 
Kelly.

    All of the Shares being offered hereunder by the Selling Stockholders are
either issuable upon exercise of warrants or options issued by Base Ten to the 
Selling Stockholders or have been issued upon exercise of such warrants or 
options. The Company agreed to register the Shares for the accounts of certain 
of the Selling Stockholders and has filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission under the Securities Act a Registration Statement on Form S-3 of 
which this Prospectus is a part, covering the resale of the Shares from time to
time.


                              PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
 
    The Shares being offered hereunder by the Selling Stockholders will be
offered from time to time in open market transactions, negotiated transactions,
principal transactions or by a combination of these methods of sale. The Shares
may be offered at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices
related to the prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. The Selling
Stockholders may effect these transactions by selling Shares to or through
broker-dealers. Broker-dealers may receive compensation in the form of
discounts, concessions or commissions from Selling Stockholders or purchasers
for whom the broker-dealers may act as agent or to whom they sell as principal
or both. Compensation paid to a particular broker-dealer might be in excess of
customary commissions. Selling Stockholders and broker-dealers participating in
the sale of Shares may be deemed to be underwriters, and any profit on the sale
of Shares or compensation received by them may be deemed to be underwriting
compensation under the Securities Act.

                                     9

<PAGE>
 
    The Company has agreed with the Selling Stockholders, among other things,
(i) to bear all expenses (other than underwriting discounts and selling
commissions, and fees and expenses of counsel and other advisers to the Selling
Stockholders) in connection with the registration and sale of the Shares being
offered by them and (ii) to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, as underwriters or
otherwise.
 
                                  OTHER EVENTS


 
    The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on March 20, 1997. At the
meeting all the director nominees were elected and all the individuals who were
directors continued thereafter, except that on April 2, 1997, Bruce Cowen
resigned from the Board of Directors and his office as Vice Chairman. His
resignation was for personal reasons unrelated to the Company.


 
    In addition, the amendments of the Company's Discretionary Deferred
Compensation Plan were approved.
 




                                       10

<PAGE>

                PART II. INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
 
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                <C>
     SEC registration fee.............................................  $1,260.36
     Blue sky fees and expenses.......................................    250.00*
     Transfer Agent's fees............................................     50.00*
     Printing and engraving costs.....................................    100.00*
     Legal fees.......................................................  2,500.00*
     Accounting fees..................................................  1,000.00*
     Miscellaneous....................................................     339.64
                                                                        ---------
          Total.......................................................  $5,500.00*
                                                                        ---------
                                                                        ---------

     --------------------
     * Estimated
</TABLE>
 
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
 
    Article 9 of Base Ten's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended,
provides as follows:
 
    Any present or future Director or Officer of the Corporation, and any 
present or future director or officer of any other corporation serving as 
such at the request of the Corporation, or the legal representative of any 
such Director or Officer, shall be indemnified by the Corporation against 
reasonable costs, expenses (exclusive of any amount paid to the Corporation 
in settlement) and counsel fees paid or incurred in connection with any 
action, suit or proceeding to which any such Director or Officer or his legal 
representative may be made a party by reason of his being or having been such 
Director or Officer; provided that, (1) said action, suit or proceeding shall 
be prosecuted against such Director or Officer or against his legal 
representative to final determination, and it shall not be finally adjudged 
in said action, suit or proceeding that he had been derelict in the 
performance of his duties as such Director or Officer, or (2) said action, 
suit or proceeding shall be settled or otherwise terminated as against such 
Director or Officer or his legal representative without a final determination 
on the merits and it shall be determined by a majority of the members of the 
Board of Directors who are not parties to said action, suit or proceeding, or 
by a person or persons specially appointed by the Board of Directors to 
determine the same that said Director or Officer has not in any substantial 
way been derelict in the performance of his duties as charged in such action, 
suit or proceeding. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be 
exclusive of other rights to which such Director or Officer or legal 
representative may be entitled by law, and shall inure to the benefit of the 
heirs, executors or administrators of such Director or Officer.
 
    Article 10 of Base Ten's Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended,
provides as follows:
 
    No director or officer of the corporation shall be personally liable to 
the corporation or its shareholders for damages for breach of any duty owed 
to the corporation or its shareholders, except for liability for any breach 
of duty based upon an act or omission (a) in breach of such director's or 
officer's duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders, (b) not in 
good faith or involving a knowing violation of law, or (c) resulting in 
receipt by such director or officer of an improper personal benefit. As used 
in this Article, an act or omission in breach of a director's or officer's 
duty of loyalty means an act or omission which such director or officer knows 
or believes to be contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its 
shareholders in connection with a matter in which such director or officer 
has a material conflict of interest.
 
    The provisions of this Article shall be effective as and to the fullest
extent that, in whole or in part, they shall be authorized or permitted by the
laws of the State of New Jersey. No repeal or modification of the provisions of
this Article nor, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any modification of
law shall adversely affect any right or protection of a director or officer of
the corporation which exists at the time of such repeal or modification.

                                 II-1

<PAGE>
 
    Article X of Base Ten's By-Laws, as amended, entitled "Indemnification:
Insurance," provides as follows:
 
    Section 1. The Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is a party
or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed
action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (including an action by or in the right of the Corporation) by
reason of the fact that he is or was a director or officer of the Corporation
against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid
in settlement to the maximum extent, according to the standards and in the
manner provided by applicable law.
 
    Section 2. To the extent, according to standards and in such manner as the
Board of Directors may direct pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law
in the particular case, the Corporation shall indemnify any person who was or is
a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (including an action by or in the right of the Corporation) by
reason of the fact that he is or was an employee or agent of the Corporation, or
is or was serving at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines
and amounts paid in settlement.
 
    Section 3. The indemnification provided by this Article X shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may
be entitled under any agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors
or otherwise, both as to action in his official capacity and as to action in
another capacity while holding such office and shall continue as to a person who
has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the
benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person.
 
    Section 4. The Corporation, acting by its Board of Directors, shall have
power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation, or is or was serving at
the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise
against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him in any such
capacity, or arising out of his status as such, whether or not the Corporation
would have the power to indemnify him against such liability under the
provisions of this Article X. Nothing in this Section 4 shall obligate the
Corporation to indemnify any person to any extent other than as provided in
Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this Article X.
 
    Statutory authority for indemnification of and insurance for Base Ten's
directors and officers is contained in the New Jersey Business Corporation Act
("the Act"), in particular, Section 14A:3-5 of the Act, the material provisions
of which may be summarized as follows:
 
    Directors and officers may be indemnified in non-derivative proceedings 
against settlements, judgments, fines and penalties and against reasonable 
expenses (including counsel fees) where the person acted in good faith and in 
a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests 
of the corporation and also, in a criminal proceeding, he must have had no 
reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful. In derivative 
proceedings such persons may be indemnified against reasonable expenses 
(including counsel fees) where the person acted in good faith and in a manner 
he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the 
corporation, but not against settlements, judgments, fines or penalties 
except that, without a court determination as to entitlement to indemnity, no 
indemnity may be provided to a person who has been adjudged liable to the 
corporation. In all cases, the Act provides that indemnification may only be 
made by the corporation (unless ordered by a court) only as authorized in a 
specific case upon a determination that indemnification is proper in the 
circumstances because the person has met the applicable standard of conduct 
required of the person, requires a person to be indemnified for reasonable 
expenses (including counsel fees) to the extent he has been successful in any 
proceeding and permits a corporation to advance expenses upon an undertaking 
for repayment if it shall be ultimately determined that the director or 
officer is not entitled to indemnification. The indemnification and 
advancement of expenses provided by or granted pursuant to the Act is not 
exclusive of other rights of indemnification to which a corporate agent may 
be entitled under a certificate of incorporation, by-law, agreement, vote of 
shareholders or otherwise. However, no indemnification may be made to or on 
behalf of a director or officer if a final adjudication adverse to the 
director or officer establishes that the director's or officer's acts or 
omissions were in breach of his duty of loyalty to the corporation or its 
shareholders, were not in good faith or involved a knowing violation of law, 
or resulted in receipt by the director or officer of an improper personal 
benefit. A corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any 
directors and officers against expenses incurred in any proceeding and 
liabilities asserted against 

                                II-2

<PAGE>

them by reason of being or having been a director of officer, whether or not 
the corporation would have the power to indemnify the directors or officers 
against such expenses and liabilities under the statute.
 
    Each of the officers and directors of Base Ten is insured against certain 
liabilities which he might incur in his capacity as an officer or director of 
Base Ten or its subsidiaries pursuant to a Directors and Officers Insurance 
and Company Reimbursement Policy issued by National Union Fire Insurance 
Company of Pittsburgh, PA., and Zurich Insurance Company of Philadelphia, PA. 
The general effect of the policy is that if any claims are made against 
officers or directors of Base Ten or its subsidiaries or any of them for a 
Wrongful Act (as defined in the policy) while acting in their individual or 
collective capacities as directors or officers, to the extent Base Ten or its 
subsidiary has properly indemnified such officers and directors, the insurer 
will, subject to the retention amount, reimburse Base Ten or its subsidiary 
for 100% of any Loss (as defined in the policy). In addition, to the extent 
that Base Ten or its subsidiary has not indemnified an officer or director, 
the insurer will, subject to the retention amount, pay on behalf of such 
officer or director 100% of the Loss. Defense Costs (as defined in the 
Policy) are part of Loss and are subject to the limits of the policy.
 
    The retention amount under the policy is $250,000. The retention amount 
is first applied to Base Ten or its subsidiary. The retention amount is not 
applicable to officers or directors if Base Ten or its subsidiary is not 
permitted or required to indemnify the officers or directors. If, however, 
Base Ten or its subsidiary is permitted or required to indemnify the officers 
or directors, then the retention amount does apply to them.
 
    Under the policy, the term "Wrongful Act" means any actual or alleged 
error, or misstatement, or misleading statement, or act, or omission, or 
neglect or breach of duty by the directors or officers in their capacities as 
such, individually or collectively, or any matter claimed against them solely 
by reason of their being directors or officers of Base Ten or its 
subsidiaries, except that certain claims are excluded by the terms and 
conditions of the policy. The term "Loss" means damages, judgments, 
settlements and Defense Costs. The term "Defense Costs" means reasonable and 
necessary fees, costs and expenses consented to by the insurer resulting 
solely from the investigation, adjustment, defense and appeal of any claim 
against any director or officer, but excluding salaries of officers or 
employees of Base Ten or its subsidiaries.

                                  II-3
 
<PAGE>

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
 
    The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this Registration
Statement:
 
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   EXHIBIT
   NUMBER         EXHIBIT                                                               PAGE
- -------------  -------------                                                            ----
<S>            <C>                                                                     <C>

 3. (a)         Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant          *
                (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Amendment No. 1 to 
                Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 2-84451)
                filed on July 31, 1990).

    (b)         Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation     *
                dated September 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)(2) 
                to Amendment No. 3 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 
                (File No. 33-48404) filed on September 3, 1992).

    (c)         Amended By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to           *
                Exhibit 4(d)(2) to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 
                (File No. 33-60454) filed on April 1, 1993).

4.  (a)         Purchase Agreement dated as of August 8, 1996 between the Registrant
                and Jessee L. Upchurch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to
                Registrant's current report on Form 8-K (File (a) No. 0-1100) dated 
                August 12, 1996). 

5.              Opinion of Pitney, Hardin, Kipp and Szuch.
 

                                     II-4

<PAGE>

   EXHIBIT
   NUMBER         EXHIBIT                                                               PAGE
- -------------  -------------                                                            ----
<S>            <C>                                                                     <C>

 23.  (a)       Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP                                        II-8

 24.            Powers of Attorney of Directors and certain Officers.                   II-9

</TABLE>
 
- ------------------------
 
*   Incorporated by reference.
(A) A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
 
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
 
    1. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
 
    (1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a
post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
 
        (i)  To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
             Securities Act of 1933;
 
        (ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
             effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent
             post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the 
             aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set 
             forth in the Registration Statement;
 
       (iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of
             distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement
             or any material change to such information in the Registration 
             Statement;
 
    Provided, however, that paragraphs (i) and (ii) above do not apply if the 
information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those 
paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed by the Registrant pursuant 
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that 
are incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement. 

    (2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the 
Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to 
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, 
and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the 
initial bona fide offering thereof. 

    (3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment 
any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination 
of the offering.
 
    2. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the
registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that is incorporated by reference in the
Registration Statement shall be deemed to be a new Registration Statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
 
    3. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
the registrant pursuant to the provisions discussed in Item 6 of this
Registration Statement, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in
the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in such Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or a controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of
any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or
controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.

                                  II-5
 
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES
 
   
    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed 
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 19th day of 
June 1997.
    

 
                             BASE TEN SYSTEMS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
<S>                                <C>                                <C>

By: /s/ Myles M. Kranzler           By: /s/ Edward J. Klinsport        By: /s/ Susan M. Klinsport
      Myles M. Kranzler                  Edward J. Klinsport                  Susan M. Klinsport 
    Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer            Principal Accounting Officer 

</TABLE>

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this 
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the 
Registrant in the capacities and on the date indicated.
 

                                                Title              Date
                                                -----              ----

Myles M. Kranzler, Edward J. Klinsport,         Directors
Alan J. Eisenberg, Alexander M. Adelson,
Alan S. Poole*


   
By: /s/ Edward J. Klinsport                                     June 19, 1997
- ------------------------------------------
*Edward J. Klinsport, as attorney-in-fact
    


                                   II-6

<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   EXHIBIT
   NUMBER         EXHIBIT                                                               PAGE
- -------------  -------------                                                            ----
<S>            <C>                                                                     <C>


 3. (a)         Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of Registrant          *
                (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Amendment No. 1 to 
                Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 2-84451)
                filed on July 31, 1990). 

    (b)         Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation     *
                dated September 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)(2) 
                to Amendment No. 3 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 
                (File No. 33-48404) filed on September 3, 1992). 

    (c)         Amended By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to           *
                Exhibit 4(d)(2) to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 
                (File No. 33-60454) filed on April 1, 1993).


 4. (a)         Purchase Agreement dated as of August 8, 1996 between the Registrant 
                and Jessee L. Upchurch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to 
                Registrant's current report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-1100) dated 
                August 12, 1996). 

 5.             Opinion of Pitney, Hardin, Kipp and Szuch.

 23.(a)         Independent Auditors' Consent.                                            *

 24. Power of Attorney

</TABLE>
 
- ------------------------
*   Incorporated by reference.
 
    (A) A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 


<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 5
 
PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH
MAIL P.O. BOX 1945
MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY 07962-1945
 
January 30, 1997 
Base Ten Systems, Inc. 
One Electronics Drive 
Trenton, New Jersey 08619
 
We have acted as counsel to Base Ten Systems, Inc. (the Company) in
connection with the registration by the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Act) of 310,000 shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Company (the Shares).
 
We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the Registration
Statement), dated January 30, 1997 to be filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the registration of the
Shares.
 
We have also examined originals, or copies certified or otherwise identified 
to our satisfaction, of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws 
of the Company, as currently in effect, and relevant resolutions of the Board 
of Directors of the Company; and we have examined such other documents as we 
deemed necessary in order to express the opinion hereinafter set forth. In 
our examination of such documents and records, we have assumed the 
genuineness of all signatures, the authenticity of all documents submitted to 
us as originals, and conformity with the originals of all documents submitted 
to us as copies.
 
Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that when, as and if the 
Registration Statement shall have become effective pursuant to the provisions 
of the Act, and the Shares shall have been duly issued and delivered in the 
manner contemplated by the Registration Statement, including the Prospectus 
therein, the Shares will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
 
The foregoing opinion is limited to the laws of the State of New Jersey, and
we are expressing no opinion as to the effect of the laws of any other
jurisdiction.
 
We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an Exhibit to the 
Registration Statement and to the reference to this firm under the heading 
Legal Opinion in the Prospectus. In giving such consent, we do not thereby 
admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required 
under Section 7 of the Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the Securities 
and Exchange Commission thereunder.
 
VERY TRULY YOURS,
 
/s/ PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH
- --------------------------------
Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch
 


<PAGE>

                                                      EXHIBIT 23(a)

                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



    We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration 
Statement of Base Ten Systems, Inc. on Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 of our 
report dated December 23, 1996 (May 16, 1997 as to Note M), appearing in the 
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Base Ten Systems, Inc. for the year ended 
October 31, 1996.





Parsippany, New Jersey
May 27, 1997




<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
    KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that each individual whose signature 
appears below constitutes and appoints Myles M. Kranzler and Edward J. 
Klinsport, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents 
with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in 
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Base Ten 
Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996 and any amendments 
thereto, and to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in 
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant 
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power 
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and 
necessary to be done to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 
1934, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby 
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of 
them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by 
virtue thereof. 

                                               /s/ Myles M. Kranzler 
                                               ------------------------
                                               Myles M. Kranzler 


                                               /s/ Edward J. Klinsport
                                               ------------------------
                                               Edward J. Klinsport 


                                               /s/ Alan J. Eisenberg 
                                               ------------------------
                                               Alan J. Eisenberg 


                                              /s/ Alexander M. Adelson 
                                              -------------------------
                                              Alexander M. Adelson 


                                              /s/ Alan S. Poole 
                                              -------------------------
                                              Alan S. Poole 


                                              /s/ Susan M. Klinsport 
                                              -------------------------
                                              Susan M. Klinsport
 
                                       II-9


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission