UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-12385
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 74-1541566
State or Other Jurisdiction of IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization Identification No.
4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607
- ---------------------------------------------- -----
Address of Principal Executive Offices Zip Code
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (757) 380-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value New York Stock Exchange
(and associated Preferred Stock Purchase Rights) Chicago Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant was $980,255,986 at March 12, 1998.
35,096,044 shares of the registrant's Common Stock and associated preferred
stock purchase rights were outstanding at March 12, 1998.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Part III incorporates information from certain portions of the registrant's
definitive Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on May 15, 1998.
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company is the largest non-government-owned shipyard in the United States,
as measured by each of revenues, size of facilities, and number of employees.
Its primary business is the design, construction, repair, overhaul and refueling
of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U. S. Navy. The
Company believes it currently is: (i) the only shipyard capable of building the
Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, (ii) the only non-government-owned
shipyard capable of refueling and overhauling the Navy's nuclear-powered
aircraft carriers, and (iii) one of only two shipyards capable of building
nuclear-powered submarines. Since its inception in 1886, the Company has
developed a preeminent reputation through the construction of 264 naval ships
and 543 commercial vessels.
Aircraft carrier and submarine construction contracts with the U.S. Navy have
generated the majority of the Company's revenues. Overall, the Company's U.S.
Navy business accounted for approximately 94%, 94%, and 97% of the Company's
revenues for 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. Newport News has built nine of
the 12 active aircraft carriers in the U.S. fleet, including all eight
nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. For the last 36 years, Newport News has been
the sole designer and builder of the U.S. Navy's aircraft carriers.
On December 11, 1996, in connection with a corporate reorganization, the
Company's former parent and its subsidiaries undertook and completed various
intercompany transfers and distributions designed to restructure, divide, and
separate their then existing businesses, assets, liabilities, and operations so
that, among other things, the shipbuilding business of the Company's former
parent ("Shipbuilding Business") would be owned by the Company. The former
parent subsequently distributed (the "spinoff") pro rata to holders of the
parent company's common stock all of the outstanding common stock of the
Company.
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used herein, the term "Company"
refers: (i) for periods prior to the spinoff to Newport News Shipbuilding and
Dry Dock Company ("Newport News"), a Virginia corporation, and certain other
subsidiaries through which the former parent conducted its Shipbuilding Business
during such periods, and (ii) for periods after the spinoff, to Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. ("NNS"), a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries, including Newport News.
For a summary of the Company's revenues and operating earnings by classes of
products and service, see Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
CONSTRUCTION
The Company's primary activity is constructing ships, with approximately 55%,
55%, and 63% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively, being generated from construction work. In recent history, the
Company has principally been engaged in designing, constructing, overhauling and
repairing aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S. Navy, and the Company's
strategy is to maintain this focus on its core business while selectively
pursuing related markets such as U.S. Navy non-nuclear surface ship
construction, maintenance and repair.
Currently, the Company is constructing two Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft
carriers, Harry S. Truman and Ronald Reagan, which are scheduled for delivery in
1998 and 2002, respectively. Long-lead funding for an additional Nimitz-class
aircraft carrier, the last in its class, was originally scheduled to begin in
2000, with full funding for the construction of the carrier slated for 2002. The
Company proposed accelerating funding as a means of reducing the acquisition
cost of the carrier, and Congress responded by providing $50 million in fiscal
year 1998 for the program. Currently, the U.S. Navy is reviewing the possible
acceleration of the full construction award to 2001; however, the Company can
give no assurances as to whether or when such an acceleration might occur.
As part of its continuing efforts to provide value and attract future carrier
work, the Company established its Carrier Innovation Center ("Center"). The
Center provides a state-of-the-art venue for design and system solutions to
reduce both acquisition and life-cycle costs of ships. The Center seeks to
develop the most innovative and cost-effective designs for future aircraft
carriers built at the Company. The Center also seeks to provide an optimum
setting for integrated product and process development teams.
The Company is currently performing design concept studies for the next
generation of aircraft carriers to follow the Nimitz-class. The first aircraft
carrier in this new class, CV(X) 78, is expected to be awarded in 2006. Because
of its past experience in designing, integrating, and manufacturing aircraft
carriers, and the lack of direct competitors, the Company believes it is in a
strong competitive position to be awarded these contracts, although no
assurances can be given that it will receive any award, that the project will
not be delayed, or that the project will be funded by Congress.
The Company is also one of two U.S. manufacturers of nuclear-powered submarines.
The Company has constructed 53 nuclear-powered submarines, including 39 attack
submarines and 14 of the larger, fleet ballistic missile submarines. The Company
delivered its final Los Angeles-class submarine on August 15, 1996.
At the urging of the U.S. Navy, the Company and Electric Boat Corporation
("Electric Boat"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation,
reached an agreement in February 1997 to cooperatively build the first four new
nuclear attack submarines ("NSSNs") included in the President's defense budget.
The teaming agreement calls for each company to construct certain portions of
each submarine, with final assembly, testing, outfitting, and delivery
alternating between the two yards. Electric Boat will act as the prime
contractor and lead designer under the agreement. In September 1997, Congress
approved the Company's teaming arrangement for co-production of the first four
NSSNs as part of the 1998 fiscal year defense authorization and appropriations
processes. The teaming arrangement ensures the Company's early and ongoing
participation in this important program. Design, development, and planning work
will take place over the course of 1998, with the Company initiating significant
NSSN construction in early 1999. The Company estimates that the NSSN program
could total up to 30 submarines, although no assurances can be given as to the
number of NSSNs that ultimately will be procured and built by the Company,
either alone or in cooperation with Electric Boat.
The Company also completed the complex conversion of the second of two container
ships to roll-on, roll-off heavy armored vehicle Sealift transportation ships
for the U.S. Navy. The first ship was delivered in August 1996 and the second
ship was delivered in May 1997.
As part of a strategy introduced in the early 1990's to add to its core U.S.
Navy business, the Company pursued orders for products and services from
commercial customers. From 1994 to 1996, the Company entered into fixed price
contracts to construct a total of nine Double Eagle product tankers. In March
1998, the Company announced changes in its commercial shipbuilding business that
will result in a reduction in the number of ships to be built and a withdrawal
from this market by the middle of 1999 (See Item 7 - "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Product
Tankers").
OVERHAUL AND REPAIR
The Company provides ongoing maintenance for the U.S. Navy's vessels through
overhaul, refueling, and repair work. The Company possesses unique expertise in
servicing nuclear naval systems, and believes it is the only
non-government-owned shipyard presently capable of refueling nuclear-powered
aircraft carriers. The Company has had a leading share of the market in aircraft
carrier refueling and overhauls.
In an effort to enhance the Company's operations in this area, the Company
completed its Consolidated Refueling Facility ("CRF") at a cost of approximately
$20 million in early 1997. The CRF supports the Company's Naval refueling
program by, among other things, consolidating refueling operations from 13
different facilities throughout the Company. The CRF is a 58,000 square-foot
complex consisting of production, warehousing, and training areas.
The Company also began planning and construction of a $26 million Radiological
Support Facility ("RSF") in late 1997. Scheduled for completion in 2000, the RSF
will relocate radiological support activities from 23 sites in the shipyard to a
single facility. The facility will house a liquid waste treatment plant, various
laboratory functions, and capabilities for handling hazardous/radioactive
material.
Aircraft carrier work is generally assigned by the U.S. Navy based on the type
of work, location, and cost. The Company finished the overhaul and repair of the
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in early 1997. In late 1997, overhaul and repair work
was completed on the USS Enterprise, and in the third quarter of 1998, similar
work will be completed on the USS Theodore Roosevelt. The Company also completes
"Post Shake-Down Availabilities" on carriers and submarines, consisting of
repairs and maintenance after original delivery of a vessel to the U.S. Navy.
The Company expanded its overhaul work in 1994 with its first contract to
overhaul a guided missile destroyer, the USS Thorn. The Company has completed a
series of destroyer repair jobs since that time. In the first quarter of 1997,
the Company completed its first overhaul of an Aegis-class ship, the USS
Monterey.
In December 1997, the Company completed its acquisition of Continental Maritime
Industries, Inc. ("CMI"), a ship repair yard in San Diego, California engaged in
repair programs for the U.S. Navy's West Coast fleet. The acquisition is a key
component of the Company's long-term strategy to broaden its base of services to
the Navy. In addition to providing an immediate presence in San Diego, the
Navy's primary homeport on the West Coast, CMI offers the Company an experienced
management team that has a successful track record in the West Coast ship repair
and fleet support markets.
ENGINEERING
The Company provides engineering, planning, and design services primarily to the
U.S. Navy. The Company maintains a stable level of funded engineering support
services for the U.S. Navy, which includes new aircraft carrier research and
development, reactor plant planning, aircraft carrier engineering support, and
training and logistics. The Company is a leader in aircraft carrier design,
performing a majority of the ship integration and related design development
work of the Naval Sea Systems Command. Navy shipyards, however, have
historically received design contracts for the non-nuclear portions of the
aircraft carriers. The Company has been able to apply its engineering
capabilities in a variety of projects for the U.S. Navy, including being the
lead design yard for the Los Angeles-class and Seawolf-class submarines.
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING, CLAIMS AND INVESTIGATIONS
More than 90% of the Company's sales involve contracts entered into with the
U.S. Government. The Company's principal U.S. Government business is currently
performed under fixed price ("FP"), fixed price plus incentive fee ("FPIF"),
cost plus incentive fee ("CPIF") , and cost plus fixed fee ("CPFF") contracts.
The risk to the Company of not being reimbursed for its costs varies with the
type of contract. Under FP contracts, the contractor retains all cost savings on
completed contracts, but is liable for the full amount of all expenditures in
excess of the contract price. FPIF contracts, on the other hand, provide for
cost sharing between the U.S. Government and the contractor. The contractor's
fee is increased or decreased according to a formula set forth in the contract,
which generally compares the amount of cost incurred to the contract target
cost. The Government is liable for all allowable costs up to a ceiling price.
Under CPIF contracts, the contractor's profit is determined by a contractually
specified formula, which essentially compares allowable incurred costs to the
contract target cost. Under CPFF contracts, with few exceptions, the fee is the
same without regard to the amount of cost incurred. The Company currently
constructs aircraft carriers pursuant to FPIF contracts, but it performs work
for the U.S. Government under all the types of contracts described above.
Contracting with the U.S. Government can also result in the Company filing a
Request for Equitable Adjustment ("REA") in connection with a contract. REAs
represent claims against the U.S. Government for changes in the original
contract specifications and resulting delays and disruption in contract
performance. There are currently no material REAs under negotiation with the
Company's customers.
The U.S. Government has the right to suspend or debar a contractor from
government contracting for violations of certain statutes or government
procurement regulations. The U.S. Government may also unilaterally terminate
contracts at its convenience with compensation for work completed.
As a general practice within the defense industry, the Defense Contract Audit
Agency (the "DCAA") and other government agencies continually review the cost
accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company,
conduct other investigations, and make specific inquiries. In the course of
those reviews and investigations, cost accounting and other issues are
identified, discussed and settled, or resolved through legal proceedings.
As with many government contractors, the government has from time to time
recommended that certain of the Company's contract prices be reduced, or costs
allocated to its government contracts be disallowed. Some of these
recommendations involve substantial amounts. In the past, as a result of such
audits and other investigations and inquiries, the Company has made adjustments
to its contract prices and the cost allocated to its government contracts.
The Company is currently involved in several such audit and other investigative
proceedings with the U.S. Government. Although the eventual outcome of these
audits and investigations cannot be determined at this time, management
believes, based on current information, that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition or results of operations (See Note 14 - "Commitments and
Contingencies" to the Financial Statements of the Company).
COMPETITION
In the Company's opinion, the number of programs currently planned by the U.S.
Navy over the next several years will increase competitive pressures among U.S.
shipyards presently engaged in ship design and construction. The reduced level
of shipbuilding activity by the U.S. Navy during the past decade has resulted in
significant workforce reductions in the industry, but almost no infrastructure
consolidation. The general result has been fewer contracts awarded to the same
fixed number of large shipyards.
The Company believes an existing government-owned U.S. West Coast shipyard could
refuel nuclear-powered carriers if it made substantial investments in its
facilities, personnel, and training. An existing government-owned U.S. East
Coast shipyard is presently involved in nuclear refueling, overhauling, and
de-activation of Los Angeles-class submarines. With respect to the market for
U.S. military contracts for other types of vessels, there are principally six
major private U.S. shipyards, including the Company, that compete for contracts
to construct, overhaul, repair or convert other types of surface combatant
vessels. The Company is also directly dependent upon the allocation of defense
monies to the U.S. Navy.
In addition to competition from other shipyards, the Company competes for
project approval and funding with firms providing other defense products and
services, such as tanks and aircraft, to other branches of the armed forces, and
with other, non-defense demands on the U.S. budget. The Company also competes in
the engineering, planning, and design market with other companies which provide
engineering support services.
REGULATION
The Company is subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations in all
jurisdictions in which it operates. Management of the Company believes that the
Company is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations. Historically, environmental compliance costs incurred by the
Company have not been material (See, however, "Commercial Construction Program
Recent Events" on pages 8 and 9). Like all of its U.S. competitors, the Company
will be required to upgrade its air emission control facilities pursuant to
recently drafted regulations under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. These
regulations call for a phased-in compliance program so that the Company will
spread its costs over the years from 1997 through 2000. Environmental compliance
costs for the year ended December 31, 1997 were not material to the Company's
financial position or results of operations (See, however, "Commercial
Construction Program Recent Events" on pages 8 and 9). Although there can be no
assurances, management does not believe that future environmental compliance
costs will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or
results of operations.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Energy and the Department
of Defense regulate and control various matters relating to nuclear materials
handled by the Company. Subject to certain requirements and limitations, the
Company's government contracts generally provide for indemnity by the U.S.
Government for any loss arising out of or resulting from certain nuclear risks
(See also "Government Contracting, Claims, and Investigations" on pages 3 and
4).
BACKLOG
The Company's firm backlog at December 31, 1997 and 1996 was $2.8 billion and
$3.5 billion, respectively. Backlog levels can change and U.S. Government
contracts can be unilaterally terminated for the convenience of the U.S.
Government at any time with compensation for work completed. More than 90% of
the Company's backlog at December 31, 1997 continued to be U.S. Navy-related and
major additions are anticipated in 1998 with expected awards for the Nimitz
refueling and new attack submarine. The portion of 1997's backlog expected to
remain at December 31, 1998 is $1.6 billion.
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
All major materials, parts, and components for the Company's products are
currently available in adequate supply from domestic and/or foreign sources.
Through the cost escalation provisions contained in some of its U.S. Government
contracts, the Company is generally protected from increases in its materials
costs to the extent that the increases in the Company's costs are in line with
industry indices. In connection with its government contracts, the Company is
required to procure certain materials and component parts from supply sources
approved by the U.S. Government. The Company has not generally been dependent
upon any one supply source; however, due largely to the consolidation of the
defense industry, there are currently several components for which there is only
one supplier. The Company believes that these sole source suppliers as well as
its overall supplier base are adequate to meet its foreseeable future needs.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research and development costs are charged to operating costs and expenses as
incurred. The amounts charged during the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996,
and 1995 were $38 million, $42 million, and $20 million, respectively. Under
current regulations, research and development costs can be charged to the U.S.
Government as allowable overhead allocated across all of the Company's
contracts. The actual amount of research and development costs allowed to pass
through U.S. Navy contracts is reviewed annually. Additionally, research and
development costs can also be directly funded by the U.S. Government through
specific contracts. These contracts produce quantifiable deliverables for the
U.S. Navy, for example, certain research and development projects on aircraft
carriers. Additional research and development costs incurred under specific
customer contracts during the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995 were
$38 million, $25 million, and $27 million, respectively.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of 1997, the Company had approximately 18,400 employees, of whom
approximately 55% were covered by collective bargaining agreements with various
unions. The Company has entered into four collective bargaining agreements
covering nearly all of the Company's approximately 10,300 hourly employees. The
agreement with the United Steelworkers of America covers approximately 9,600
employees and expires April 4, 1999. The other agreements cover approximately
300 employees and expire by 2001. Although the Company believes that its
relationships with these unions are good, there can be no assurance that the
Company will not experience labor disruptions associated with the collective
bargaining agreements.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT OF PURPOSES OF "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning,
among other things, the Company's prospects, developments and business
strategies. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of
words such as "intends," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "anticipates,"
"should," "believes," "scheduled," and derivatives of such words. The Company's
actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include
(i) the factors discussed in this Item 1 and Notes 10, 11, 12, and 14 to the
Company's Financial Statements, and (ii) the following factors: (a) general
political, economic and competitive conditions; (b) initiatives to reduce the
federal budget deficit and reductions in defense spending; (c) reductions in the
volume of U.S. Navy contracts awarded to the Company; and (d) unanticipated
events affecting delivery and production schedules or design and manufacturing
processes, thus impairing the Company's efforts to deliver its products on time
or to reduce production costs and cycle time or realize in a timely manner some
or all of the benefits, if any, of such reductions.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Company's principal facilities are located in Newport News, Virginia on
approximately 550 acres owned by the Company at the mouth of the James River.
Its facilities include seven graving docks, a floating dry dock, two outfitting
berths, five outfitting piers, a module outfitting facility, and various other
shops. Dry Dock 12 is the largest in the Western Hemisphere, and has recently
been extended to 662 meters. Dry Dock 12 is serviced by a 900 metric ton
capacity gantry crane that spans the dry dock and work platen. These facilities
are pledged as collateral under terms of the Company's outstanding long-term
debt agreements (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the
Financial Statements of the Company). The Company believes that substantially
all of its productive assets are, in general, well maintained, in good operating
condition, considered adequate for present needs, and, as supplemented by
planned construction, expected to remain adequate for the near future.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in Item 1 under the caption " Government Contracting,
Claims and Investigations" appearing on pages 3 and 4, and in Note
14-"Commitments and Contingencies - Government Contracting and Significant
Estimates" to the Financial Statements of the Company appearing on pages 38
through 40, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference in response to this item.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 4.1 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information as to executive officers of the Company, set forth in Item 10,
appearing on pages 43 through 45 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is hereby
incorporated in this Item 4.1 by reference.
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company
is listed on the New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges. Options in the Company's
stock are traded on the American Stock Exchange.
The following table reflects the range of high and low selling prices of the
Company's common stock by quarter for 1997 based on selling prices as reported
by the New York Stock Exchange.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997
High Low
<S> <C>
First Quarter.................................................................. $ 17 $ 14 1/2
Second Quarter................................................................. 18 13
Third Quarter.................................................................. 22 1/8 17 1/4
Fourth Quarter................................................................. 26 3/8 20 3/8
</TABLE>
The high and low sale prices of Common Stock from the inception of trading on
December 12, 1996, on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Tape,
through December 31, 1996, were $17 and $13 7/8, respectively.
Dividends of $5.6 million were paid on the Common Stock during 1997. No
dividends were paid on the Common Stock during 1996. As of December 31, 1997,
the Company had 34,864,594 shares of Common Stock outstanding. At March 12,
1998, there were approximately 49,365 holders of record of Common Stock. The
Company's long-term debt obligations contain certain customary restrictive
covenants, including a limitation on the payment of dividends (See Note 7 -
"Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the Financial Statements of the
Company).
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
1997(a) 1996(a) 1995(a) 1994 1993
------- ------- ------- ------- -----
<S> <C>
Millions, except per share data
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA:
Revenues.................................................... $ 1,707 $ 1,870 $ 1,756 $ 1,753 $ 1,861
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Net earnings................................................ $ (48) $ 55 $ 73 $ 91 $ 111
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Net earnings per common share (b)
Basic.................................................. $(1.39) $ 1.60 N/A N/A N/A
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets................................................ $ 1,476 $ 1,489 $ 1,380 $ 1,263 $ 1,235
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Long-term obligations (c) .................................. $ 548 $ 596 $ 292 $ 287 $ 423
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Cash dividends declared per common share (d) ............... $ .16 N/A N/A N/A N/A
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
(a) For a discussion of significant items affecting comparability of the
financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1996, and 1995, see Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
(b) Basic net earnings per common share is based on net earnings divided by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended
December 31, 1997, and the period from December 12, 1996 through December
31, 1996. Since the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary prior to December
12, 1996, there are no comparable results for prior periods (See Note 15 -
"Transactions With Former Parent Company - Corporate Debt and Interest
Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the Company).
(c) Amounts prior to 1996 represent debt allocated to the Company from its
former parent (See Note 15 "Transactions With Former Parent Company -
Corporate Debt and Interest Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the
Company). Historical amounts for 1997 and 1996 represent obligations of the
Company as a separate public entity.
(d) Cash dividends declared per common share were four cents per share for each
quarter in 1997. Since the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary prior to
December 12, 1996, there are no comparable results for prior periods (See
Note 15 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company - Corporate Debt and
Interest Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the Company).
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following review of the results of operations and financial condition of the
Company should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related
notes contained herein.
The U.S. Navy accounted for approximately 94% of the Company's revenues in 1997,
94% in 1996, and 97% in 1995. The Company's principal U.S. Navy business is
currently being performed under fixed price or fixed price incentive contracts,
which wholly or partially shift the risk of construction costs that exceed the
contract target cost to the Company. The accompanying table summarizes the
percentage of revenues by contract type.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contract Type 1997 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Fixed Price....................................... 61% 64% 75%
Cost-Based........................................ 39 36 25
-------- --------- -------
Total............................................. 100% 100% 100%
======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
The Company reports revenues and profits on its long-term contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, determined on the basis of
incurred costs to estimated final total costs. Losses on contracts are reported
when first estimated. The performance of contracts usually extends over several
years, requiring periodic reviews and revisions of estimated final contract
prices and costs. The effect of revisions to estimates is included in earnings
in the period the revisions are made.
PRODUCT TANKERS
Commercial Construction Program Recent Events
Originally, this program involved the planned construction of nine commercial
product tankers to be delivered under fixed price contracts entered into from
1994 to 1996. During 1997, one of these ships was delivered to Mobil Oil
Corporation for use in the domestic market. In March of 1998, the Company
announced a revised strategy for this program that will result in only five of
the remaining eight ships being built, after which the Company will withdraw
from the commercial ship construction market. Work is substantially complete on
the first three of the remaining five ships which are scheduled to be delivered
in 1998. The final two ships will be delivered by the middle of 1999.
During the past several months, events occurred with respect to this program
which led to increased cost estimates and the revised strategy as described
above. A majority of the estimated cost growth occurred in the materials area,
and reflects the impact of supplier services, emergent material, and schedule
changes for the recently designed domestic ships. Supplier services cost
increases were driven by significant increases in coating and painting costs and
failures by several suppliers. Emergent material costs related to finalized
design specifications, as well as unanticipated costs associated with the
extension of construction schedules, including warranty and preservation costs
and additional inspection requirements, contributed to the cost growth. In
addition, the December 1997 change in the regulation of use by industry of
paints containing Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in shipbuilding and
ship repair, mandated that the paint applied to product tankers and the
application methodology be amended thereby increasing material and labor costs
even further.
In addition to the material problems discussed above, the labor estimates for
the undelivered ships have also been revised upward reflecting the fact that
productivity improvements are not being achieved at the levels previously
anticipated. As a result, man-hour estimates for the ships have been increased
and learning curve projections have been modified as well. Factors contributing
to the productivity shortfall include the material issues described above,
emergent design changes, and revised ship construction and delivery schedules.
As a result of these increased estimated costs, the Company recorded additional
charges against 1997 operating earnings of approximately $207 million, net of
previously established reserves of $57 million, for the completion of the Double
Eagle product tanker program and the cancellation costs associated with the last
three ships. In addition, the Company is currently conducting internal reviews
and has engaged a leading consulting firm to evaluate and make recommendations
regarding engineering, sourcing, materials management, manufacturing, and
overall program management. Management cannot currently predict the outcome of
these reviews or their impact on the Company.
1997 COMPARED TO 1996
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues 1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Construction.................................................. $ 935 $ 1,029
Overhaul and Repair........................................... 500 625
Engineering................................................... 248 194
Related Businesses & Other.................................... 24 22
------ ------
Total......................................................... $1,707 $ 1,870
====== =======
</TABLE>
The Company's revenues decreased 8.7% during 1997, declining to $1.71 billion
from $1.87 billion in 1996. The lower revenue level, as detailed in the
following discussion of operations, is driven by Construction and Overhaul and
Repair.
Construction - The $94 million decrease in Construction revenues in 1997 is due
to the absence of submarine construction work, as well as decreases in Sealift
conversion and Double Eagle product tanker work. These decreases are partially
offset by increased construction activity on the aircraft carrier Reagan.
Overhaul and Repair -Overhaul and Repair revenues declined substantially in 1997
as a result of the delivery of the aircraft carrier Eisenhower in January. The
decrease is partially offset by increased overhaul activity on the aircraft
carrier Roosevelt and increased planning work for the aircraft carrier Nimitz
refueling.
Engineering - Engineering revenues improved in 1997, increasing to $248 million
from $194 million in 1996. Expanded engineering work related to the New Attack
Submarine (NSSN), as well as increased nuclear and R&D efforts, contributed to
the revenue growth. Requirements for Seawolf submarine design work have declined
due to the maturity of the production program for this class of submarines.
Related Businesses & Other - Revenues from Related Businesses & Other increased
by $2 million in 1997. The higher level of activity in 1997 is due to increased
efforts with respect to valve and pump repairs and other miscellaneous work.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Earnings 1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Construction.................................................. $ (83) $ 44
Overhaul and Repair........................................... 50 88
Engineering................................................... 19 13
Related Businesses & Other.................................... (5) (5)
------ -------
Total......................................................... $ (19) $ 140
====== =======
</TABLE>
The operating loss of $19 million in 1997 represents a $159 million decline from
the 1996 level of $140 million in operating earnings. This decline is primarily
attributable to the $207 million of net additional charges against operating
earnings on the Double Eagle product tanker construction program discussed above
(See "Commercial Construction Program Recent Events" on pages 8 and 9).
Additionally, the decline is due to lower Overhaul and Repair income
contributions associated with the January 1997 delivery of the aircraft carrier
Eisenhower, and one-time gains in 1996 attributable to the mix of work and
maturity of several contracts. Partially offsetting the decrease is the 1997
improvement in Engineering earnings.
Construction - The $127 million decline in operating earnings on Construction
work in 1997 is a result of the recognition of losses associated with product
tanker construction and lower income contributions from the lack of Los
Angeles-class submarine construction work. The decrease is partially offset by
strong carrier contributions, particularly with respect to the Reagan contract
and the fact that 1996 was significantly impacted by the recognition of losses
associated with Sealift conversion work.
Overhaul and Repair - The $38 million decrease in operating earnings for
Overhaul and Repair work in 1997 is a result of the completion of the Eisenhower
overhaul in January of 1997, and one-time gains in 1996 attributable to the mix
of work and maturity of several contracts. The decrease is partially mitigated
by increased overhaul activity on the Roosevelt and planning work for the Nimitz
refueling.
Engineering - The $6 million increase in operating earnings for Engineering work
reflects the increased volume in nuclear and submarine engineering activities,
as well as favorable contract close-outs.
Related Businesses & Other - Other operating losses are comparable and not
significant to either period presented.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Cash Flows 1997 1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Millions
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities.............. $ 105 $ (75)
Capital expenditures.......................................... (31) (74)
Other investing cash flows.................................... (3) (25)
------- -------
Subtotal...................................................... 71 (174)
Financing activities.......................................... (69) 173
------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.......... $ 2 $ (1)
======= =======
</TABLE>
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities - The $180 million increase in
the 1997 comparative cash flows from operating activities is due to a decreased
investment in working capital partially offset by lower operating earnings. The
lower operating earnings are attributable to the factors discussed above in
"1997 Compared to 1996 - Results of Operations, Operating Earnings." The
decrease in working capital is caused by normal timing fluctuations and
management initiatives, as well as efforts by the Company to reduce accounts
receivable balances. Additionally, 1997 reflects lower tax payments due to the
recognition of losses previously deferred for tax purposes on commercial
tankers.
Capital Expenditures - The decrease in capital expenditures in 1997 compared to
1996 is attributable to higher expenditures related to major capital improvement
programs during the prior year. The Company's 1996 capital improvement program
consisted principally of three separate projects: (i) development of a
state-of-the-art automated steel cutting and fabrication facility; (ii)
extension of a dry dock facility; and (iii) construction of the Carrier
Refueling Complex. All three of these projects were substantially complete at
the end of 1996, thus explaining the current period reduction in capital
investments.
Other Investing Cash Flows - Other investing cash flow activities in 1997 and
1996 primarily relate to an investment for a 49% ownership interest in a
vessel-owning limited partnership with a U.S. shipping firm which will own and
operate four of the product tankers under construction by the Company. In
addition, 1996 also included a $9.6 million investment achieving the Company's
40% equity interest in the Abu Dhabi Ship Building Company.
Financing Activities - In 1997, the Company received $10 million from the
issuance of common stock related to the Company's benefit plans. These funds, as
well as those generated from operations, enabled the Company to pay off
long-term debt, purchase Company stock on the open market for employee benefit
plans and treasury stock, and pay annual dividends of sixteen cents per share.
The Company also used treasury stock to acquire CMI in December 1997 (See Note 5
- - "Acquisition" to the Financial Statements of the Company). In 1996, the
Company received from its former parent, on a net basis, $149 million to finance
operating cash flow needs and cover costs of its capital improvement program
(See Note 15 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company" to the Financial
Statements of the Company).
Capital Requirements and Resources - The Company requires that adequate working
capital be available at all times. While construction and conversion contracts
provide for progress payments, they generally require extensive investment in
contracts in process because of contract progress payment retentions and change
orders. Retentions, generally due upon completion or acceptance of the
contracted work, amounted to $29 million as of December 31, 1997. Change orders,
which make up an appreciable portion of the Company's work, sometimes require
long periods of negotiation during which time the expended funds are not
available for other uses.
The Company estimates that expenditures aggregating approximately $35 million
will be required after December 31, 1997 to complete planned projects for which
substantial commitments have been made. The Company also believes it will be
required to make tax payments in the range of $110 million to $120 million in
1998 after completion of the Stennis-Truman aircraft carrier contract.
On November 4, 1996, the Company entered into a $415 million senior credit
facility ("Credit Agreement") which includes a $215 million six-year Revolving
Credit Facility, of which $125 million may be used for advances and letters of
credit and $90 million may be used for standby letters of credit. This Agreement
contains customary financial and restrictive covenants which limit borrowing
capacity under the credit facility. As of December 31, 1997 the Company had used
$87 million of the credit facility for standby letters of credit and utilized no
portion of the $125 million for advances (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and
Financing Arrangements" to the Financial Statements of the Company).
Based on 1997 financial results, the Company was technically in default with
respect to its debt covenants; however, a waiver was granted by the lenders in
March 1998 to reinstate the Company's compliance with the provisions of the
Credit Agreement. The waiver leaves the terms of these agreements essentially
unchanged.
The product tanker charge taken in 1997 (See also "Product Tankers" on pages 8
and 9) is also expected to have an impact on the Company's cash flow for 1998.
Management believes that this charge and other capital requirements as described
above for its overall operations, payment of dividends, taxes, and debt service
can be met by existing cash, internally generated funds, and the Revolving
Credit Facility.
INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES
Prior to the spinoff, corporate debt of the Company's former parent and its
related interest expense were allocated to the Company based upon the ratio of
the Company's net assets to the parent's consolidated net assets plus debt. As
an independent company, the Company's debt level and attendant interest expense
are higher than the historical allocations. As a result, 1997 interest expense
as a separate entity is higher.
The effective tax rates for 1997 and 1996 are approximately 35% and 46%,
respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate in 1996
compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% is principally due to state
income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences for tax.
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The Company adopted FAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share," and FAS No. 129,
"Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure," in 1997. The adoption
of these new standards did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
RECENTLY ISSUED STANDARDS
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new statement,
FAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income". FAS No. 130 establishes standards
for reporting and the display of comprehensive income and its components in a
full set of general purpose financial statements. FAS No. 130 is effective for
financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. The
future adoption of this new standard is not expected to have any impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In December 1997, the AICPA issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-3,
"Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related
Assessments". The SOP provides, among other things, that an entity should
recognize a liability for guaranty-fund and other insurance-related assessments.
The SOP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. The
adoption of this SOP is required to be reported as a cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of SOP 97-3 in relation to certain Department of Labor annual assessments and is
currently unable to determine the impact it will have on the reported financial
position and results of operations of the Company.
OTHER MATTERS
The Company has assessed and continues to evaluate the impact of the "Year 2000"
issue on its systems and operations. Because many computer systems and
applications currently use two-digit date fields to designate a year, when the
new century begins, date sensitive systems may recognize the year 2000 as 1900
or not at all. The inability to recognize or properly treat the Year 2000 issue
could cause systems to process critical financial and operational information
incorrectly. A Year 2000 Plan has been developed, and based on Company
assessments, the costs associated with addressing this issue are not expected to
have a material impact on the financial position or the results of operations of
the Company. Work on this effort began at the end of 1994 with remediation of
systems using long lead-time dates. The target completion date for Company
computer systems is November 1998, and a comprehensive off-site integration test
is scheduled for December 1998. Expenditures so far have totaled approximately
$1 million with total projected expenditures estimated at $4 million. The
projected expenses include payment for the remediation of 11 outsourced
applications and the cost of remediating 22 applications in-house. A company
wide steering committee has been established and an outside consultant hired to
help the Company formally assess the impact of the Year 2000 issue outside the
information technology ("IT") environment. The consultant will provide a
framework for formal risk assessment and provide input to the plan for
remediation for the non-IT environment. Once the plan is complete, a budget for
remediation of embedded systems will be established. The consultant will also
examine and validate the IT plan. In addition to addressing current Company
computer systems, the Company is also contacting its supplier base to ensure
their Year 2000 compliance. The Company is also installing new hardware and
software as part of its implementation of a shared data environment, which will
help mitigate any potential Year 2000 risks.
1996 COMPARED TO 1995
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Construction.................................................. $1,029 $ 1,107
Overhaul and Repair........................................... 625 414
Engineering................................................... 194 202
Related Businesses & Other.................................... 22 33
------ ------
Total......................................................... $1,870 $ 1,756
====== =======
</TABLE>
The Company's revenues increased 6.5% during 1996, growing to $1.87 billion from
$1.76 billion in 1995. The higher revenue level, as detailed in the following
discussion of operations, is driven by Overhaul and Repair.
Construction - The $78 million decrease in Construction revenues in 1996 is due
to the delivery of the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis in late 1995, the
decline in Los Angeles-class submarine production attendant with the completion
of that program in 1996, and lower levels of activity on Sealift conversions.
These decreases are partially offset by increased construction activity on the
aircraft carriers Truman and Reagan as well as Double Eagle product tankers.
Overhaul and Repair - The $211 million increase in Overhaul and Repair revenues
in 1996 is primarily attributable to the aircraft carrier Eisenhower. Revenues
generated by the Eisenhower overhaul are up due to (i) the ship being in the
yard for the full year (versus six months in 1995), and (ii) the period of
performance being compressed from 24 to 18 months.
Engineering - Engineering revenues are marginally lower in 1996, declining to
$194 million from $202 million in 1995. Requirements for Seawolf and Los
Angeles-class submarine design work have declined due to the maturity of the
production programs for these submarines.
Related Businesses & Other - Revenues from Related Businesses & Other declined
by $11 million in 1996. The higher level of activity in 1995 is due to a variety
of nonrecurring jobs for miscellaneous services.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Earnings 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Construction.................................................. $ 44 $ 95
Overhaul and Repair........................................... 88 45
Engineering................................................... 13 13
Related Businesses & Other.................................... (5) 7
------ -------
Total......................................................... $ 140 $ 160
====== =======
</TABLE>
Operating earnings of $140 million in 1996 represent a 12.5% decline from 1995's
level of $160 million. This decline in earnings is primarily attributable to
losses recognized in Construction, offset by improved performance in Overhaul
and Repair.
Construction - The $51 million decrease in operating earnings on Construction
work in 1996 relates to (i) the delivery of the carrier Stennis in late 1995,
and (ii) increases in loss accruals for commercial product tanker construction
(See Note 14 - "Commitments and Contingencies" to the Financial Statements of
the Company) and Sealift conversions. The decreases in operating earnings for
the period are partially offset by (i) increased activity and productivity
improvements on the aircraft carriers Reagan and Truman, and (ii) the favorable
settlement of contract change orders on delivered submarines.
Overhaul and Repair - The $43 million increase in operating earnings for
Overhaul and Repair work in 1996 is a result of (i) higher volume on the
Eisenhower, (ii) increased activity on carrier overhaul planning work, and (iii)
increased margins on submarine, carrier, and non-nuclear surface ship overhaul
and repair work.
Engineering - Operating earnings from Engineering work remained stable, as 1996
earnings contributions matched those reported in 1995.
Related Businesses & Other - The decrease in operating earnings in 1996 is
primarily the result of the recognition of certain professional and
administrative costs associated with NNS becoming an independent company.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Year Ended December 31
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities.............. $ (75) $ 63
Capital expenditures.......................................... (74) (77)
Other investing cash flows.................................... (25) (10)
------- -------
Subtotal...................................................... (174) (24)
Financing activities.......................................... 173 25
------- -------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents.......... $ (1) $ 1
======= =======
</TABLE>
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities - The $138 million decrease in
the 1996 comparative cash flows from operating activities is due to lower
operating earnings and an increased investment in working capital. The lower
operating earnings are attributable to the factors discussed above in "1996
Compared to 1995 - Results of Operations, Operating Earnings." The increase in
working capital is caused by normal timing fluctuations in billings and
collections. Additionally, prices on certain commercial construction contracts
are not billable until delivery, and as such, attendant working capital costs
incurred throughout the year were not billable during 1996.
Capital Expenditures - Capital expenditures in 1996 remained relatively level
with 1995 and reflect the Company's continuing investment in a strategic capital
improvement program consisting principally of three separate projects: (i)
development of a state-of-the-art automated steel cutting and fabrication
facility; (ii) extension of a dry dock facility; and (iii) construction of the
Consolidated Refueling Facility. The automated steel cutting and fabrication
facility, which is fully functional, should directly support the Company's goal
of reducing its production cost structure. The extension of the dry dock
facility was completed in June 1996 and allows for concurrent, multiple-ship
construction within the same dry dock. This improvement is expected to enable
construction resources to be utilized on multiple projects. Lastly, the
Consolidated Refueling Facility was substantially complete at the end of 1996.
This cost-efficient facility is strategically located next to the dry docks used
to refuel nuclear-powered ships.
Other Investing Cash Flows - Other investing cash flow activities in 1996 and
1995 include for each year a $9.6 million investment towards the Company's 40%
equity interest in the Abu Dhabi Ship Building Company. The remaining 1996
activity consists of a $15 million investment in a vessel-owning limited
partnership with a U.S. shipping firm.
<PAGE>
Financing Activities - The Company received from its former parent, on a net
basis, $149 million in 1996 and $25 million in 1995 to finance operating cash
flow needs and cover costs of its capital improvement program (See Note 15 -
"Transactions With Former Parent Company" to the Financial Statements of the
Company). Additionally, $24 million was borrowed under the Company's credit
facility (See "Capital Requirements and Resources" above) for working capital
needs at 1996 year-end. The Company also received $600 million in long-term debt
proceeds during 1996, which were used to pay a dividend to its former parent in
conjunction with the spinoff (See Note 7 "Long-Term Debt and Financing
Arrangements" to the Financial Statements of the Company).
INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES
Prior to the spinoff, corporate debt of the Company's former parent and its
related interest expense were allocated to the Company based upon the ratio of
the Company's net assets to the parent's consolidated net assets plus debt. As
an independent company, the Company's weighted average cost of debt is higher
than the historical allocations. As a result, interest expense as a separate
entity will initially be higher.
The effective tax rates for 1996 and 1995 were approximately 46% and 44%,
respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate in these
periods compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% is principally due to
state income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences for tax.
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The Company adopted FAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," and FAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," in 1996. The adoption of these new
standards did not have any material impact on the Company's financial position
or results of operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates
primarily to the Company's short-term investment portfolio and the debt
outstanding under the Credit Agreement (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and
Financing Arrangements" and Note 8 - "Financial Instruments" to the Financial
Statements of the Company).
The maturity, credit quality, and security class of the Company's short-term
investment portfolio are limited by both the Credit Agreement and the Company's
investment policy. The Company limits default risk by investing in only the
safest and highest credit quality securities limited to the following: direct
obligations of the United States of America including any governmental entity or
agency, commercial paper with a rating of A-1/P-1 or better, certificates of
deposit issued by major financial institutions, repurchase agreements
collateralized 102% by the aforementioned securities, and money market funds
rated AAAm by S&P. As stated in its policy, the Company is adverse to principal
loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting
default risk and market risk. Additionally, the Company's investment policy
guidelines limit the credit exposure to any one issue, issuer, and type of
instrument. The Company's Credit Agreement limits the maturity of investments
held in the Company's portfolio to one year or less.
The Company's policy is to manage interest rate risk associated with its
outstanding debt obligations through the use of a combination of fixed and
floating rate debt. With the exception of the Company's Senior Credit Facility
(See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the Financial
Statements of the Company), all other outstanding debt obligations are fixed. As
of December 31, 1997, approximately 70% of the Company's outstanding debt was
fixed-rate debt. Interest rate swaps may be used to adjust interest exposure
when appropriate, based upon market conditions. Additionally, the Company may
use interest rate CAPs to limit the interest rate risk on its floating-rate
debt. All of the Company's outstanding debt obligations are denominated in U. S.
Dollars. As of December 31, 1997, the Company had no interest rate derivative
contracts outstanding.
Foreign Currency Risk
Although the majority of the Company's transactions are in U. S. Dollars, the
Company periodically enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to
hedge certain specific transactions associated with the purchase of raw material
and machinery denominated in a foreign currency. The purpose of entering into
these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on the results of operations. Such contracts generally mature in
one year or less and the cost of replacing these contracts in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties is not significant. Unrealized gains and losses
on these contracts are deferred and recognized in the results of operations in
the period in which the hedged transaction is consummated. The Company does not
enter into foreign currency contracts for trading purposes. At December 31,
1997, the Company had no foreign currency contracts outstanding.
<PAGE>
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<S> <C>
Report of Independent Public Accountants................................................................ 18
Statements of Earnings for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997..................................................................... 19
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1997 and 1996............................................ 20
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1997..................................................................... 21
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997................................................................. 22
Notes to Financial Statements........................................................................... 23
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. (a Delaware corporation) as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and
the related statements of earnings, cash flows and changes in stockholders'
equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Washington, D.C.,
March 31, 1998
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
----------- --------- ------
(Consolidated) (Combined) (Combined)
<S> <C>
Millions (Except Shares and Per Share Amounts)
Revenues............................................................... $ 1,707 $ 1,870 $ 1,756
Operating Costs and Expenses........................................... 1,729 1,729 1,599
Other Income (Expense), net............................................ 3 (1) 3
-------- --------- ---------
Operating Earnings..................................................... (19) 140 160
Interest Expense, net of interest capitalized.......................... (55) (38) (29)
-------- --------- ---------
Earnings Before Income Taxes........................................... (74) 102 131
(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes................................... (26) 47 58
-------- --------- ---------
Net Earnings........................................................... $ (48) $ 55 $ 73
======== ========= =========
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding.................. 34,741,818 34,297,451 N/A
========== ============== ========
Basic Net Earnings Per Common Share.................................... $ (1.39) $ 1.60 N/A
======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements of earnings.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
Millions (Except Shares and Per Share Amounts) 1997 1996
<S> <C> ------------- ---------
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents.................................................... $ 3 $ 1
Accounts Receivable.......................................................... 136 182
Contracts in Process......................................................... 210 258
Inventory.................................................................... 44 45
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................ 50 -
Other Current Assets......................................................... 12 5
------ -------
Total Current Assets......................................................... 455 491
------ -------
Noncurrent Assets
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net.......................................... 816 836
Other Assets................................................................. 205 162
------ -------
Total Noncurrent Assets...................................................... 1,021 998
------ -------
$1,476 $ 1,489
====== =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Trade Accounts Payable....................................................... $ 151 $ 123
Short-Term Debt.............................................................. 30 28
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................ - 4
Other Accrued Liabilities.................................................... 175 101
------ -------
Total Current Liabilities.................................................... 356 256
------ -------
Noncurrent Liabilities
Long-Term Debt............................................................... 548 596
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................ 199 183
Postretirement Benefits...................................................... 107 109
Other Long-Term Liabilities.................................................. 83 113
Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 14)
------ -------
Total Noncurrent Liabilities................................................. 937 1,001
------ -------
Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock, $.01 par value -
authorized 70,000,000 shares; issued 34,948,663 shares at
December 31, 1997, and 34,297,451 shares at December 31, 1996........... 1 1
Paid-In Capital.............................................................. 256 245
Accumulated Deficit.......................................................... (68) (14)
Unearned Compensation ....................................................... (4) -
Treasury Stock (84,069 shares at December 31, 1997).......................... (2) -
------ -------
Total Stockholders' Equity................................................... 183 232
------ -------
$1,476 $ 1,489
====== =======
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance
sheets.
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
----------- ----------- -------
(Consolidated) (Combined) (Combined)
<S> <C>
Millions
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Earnings ......................................................... $ (48) $ 55 $ 73
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings to
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities -
Depreciation and Amortization................................. 68 65 67
Deferred Income Taxes......................................... (38) (10) (2)
Allocated Corporate Interest, net of tax...................... - 20 18
Loss On Equity Investments.................................... 1 2 -
Changes in Components of Working Capital -
Decrease(Increase) in -
Accounts Receivable...................................... 53 (116) 22
Contracts in Process..................................... 133 (7) (95)
Inventory................................................ 1 10 (9)
Note Receivable.......................................... - 18 -
Other Current Assets..................................... (6) 11 (4)
Increase(Decrease) in -
Trade Accounts Payable................................... 23 21 36
Accounts Payable to Former Parent........................ - (67) (50)
Other Accrued Liabilities................................ (14) (35) 8
Other, net.................................................... (68) (42) (1)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities....................... 105 (75) 63
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital Expenditures................................................... (31) (74) (77)
Other.................................................................. (3) (25) (10)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities.................................. (34) (99) (87)
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Cash Transfer from Former Parent....................................... - 149 25
Increase (Decrease) in Revolving Credit Facility....................... (24) 24 -
Proceeds from Long-Term Debt........................................... - 600 -
Payments on Long-Term Debt............................................. (28) - -
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock................................. 10 - -
Treasury Stock Purchases............................................... (32) - -
Proceeds from Issuance of Treasury Stock............................... 11 - -
Dividends Paid on Common Stock......................................... (6) - -
Dividend Paid to Former Parent......................................... - (600) -
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Financing Activities....................... (69) 173 25
----------- ----------- -----------
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents................... 2 (1) 1
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period....................... 1 2 1
----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period............................. $ 3 $ 1 $ 2
=========== =========== ===========
Cash Paid During the Period for Income Taxes........................... $ 8 $ 129 $ 122
=========== =========== ===========
Cash Paid During the Period for Interest............................... $ 54 $ 3 $ -
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements of cash flows.
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Combined Common Stock Paid-In Accumulated
Equity Shares Par Capital Deficit
--------- ----------- -------- ------------- -----------
<S> <C>
Millions, except for shares
Balance - January 1, 1995 $ 199 - $ - $ - $ -
Net Earnings 73 - - - -
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent 25 - - - -
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
Net Change in Allocated Corporate Debt (43) - - - -
Allocated Corporate Interest,
net of tax 18 - - - -
------- ----------- --------- ---------- ------------
Balance - December 31, 1995 272 - - - -
Net Earnings 69 - - - -
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent 149 - - - -
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
Net Change in Allocated Corporate Debt 360 - - - -
Allocated Corporate Interest,
net of tax 20 - - - -
Other (24) - - - -
Dividend to Former Parent (600) - - - -
Issuance of Common Stock in Connection
With the Spinoff (246) 34,297,451 1 245 -
--------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance - December 11, 1996 - 34,297,451 1 245 -
Net Loss - - - - (14)
--------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------------
Balance - December 31, 1996 - 34,297,451 1 245 (14)
Net Loss - - - - (48)
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock - - - - (6)
Issuance of Common Stock - 651,212 - 10 -
Performance Share Grants - - - 5 -
Purchase of Treasury Shares - - - - -
Issuance of Treasury Shares - - - (8) -
Unearned ESOP Compensation - - - 4 -
--------- ------------ -------- -------- -------------
Balance - December 31, 1997 $ - 34,948,663 $ 1 $ 256 $ (68)
========= ============ ======== ======== =============
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Treasury Stock
Unearned -----------------
Compensation Shares Amount
--------------- ---------- ------
<S> <C>
Millions, except for shares
Balance - January 1, 1995 $ - - $ -
Net Earnings - - -
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent - - -
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
Net Change in Allocated Corporate
Debt - - -
Allocated Corporate Interest,
net of tax - - -
------------ --------- ------
Balance - December 31, 1995 - - -
Net Earnings - - -
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent - - -
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
Net Change in Allocated Corporate
Debt - - -
Allocated Corporate Interest,
net of tax - - -
Other - - -
Dividend to Former Parent - - -
Issuance of Common Stock in Connection
With the Spinoff - - -
------------ ----- -------
Balance - December 11, 1996 - - -
Net Loss - - -
-------------- --------- -------
Balance - December 31, 1996 - - -
Net Loss - - -
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock - - -
Issuance of Common Stock - - -
Performance Share Grants - - -
Purchase of Treasury Shares - 1,448,743 (32)
Issuance of Treasury Shares - (1,364,674) 30
Unearned ESOP Compensation (4) - -
-------------- --------- ---------
Balance - December 31, 1997 $ (4) 84,069 $ (2)
============== ========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements of changes in
stockholders' equity.
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Basis of Presentation
Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. began stand alone operations on December 12,
1996. Previously, on December 11, 1996, in connection with a corporate
reorganization, the Company's former parent and its subsidiaries undertook and
completed various intercompany transfers and distributions designed to
restructure, divide, and separate their then existing businesses, assets,
liabilities, and operations so that, among other things, the shipbuilding
business of the former parent ("Shipbuilding Business") would be owned by the
Company (as defined below). The former parent subsequently distributed (the
"spinoff") pro rata to holders of the parent company's common stock all of the
outstanding common stock of the Company.
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used herein, the term "Company"
refers: (i) for periods prior to the spinoff to Newport News Shipbuilding and
Dry Dock Company, a Virginia corporation, and certain other subsidiaries through
which its former parent conducted its Shipbuilding Business during such periods,
and (ii) for periods after the spinoff, to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc., a
Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Newport News
Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company. These financial statements represent the
combined operations of the Shipbuilding Business prior to December 12, 1996 and
the consolidated operations of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. and its
subsidiaries thereafter.
Prior to the spinoff, all of the outstanding common stock of the Company was
owned directly or indirectly by the former parent. These financial statements
present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the
Company as if it were a separate entity for all periods. The former parent's
historical basis in the assets and liabilities of the Company has been carried
over.
Investments in 20% to 50% owned companies where the Company has the ability to
exert significant influence over operating and financial policies are carried at
cost plus equity in undistributed earnings since the date of acquisition.
Earnings recognized and distributions received from equity method investees were
not significant during any of the periods presented in the accompanying
financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
Description of Business
The Company is the largest non-government-owned shipyard in the United States.
Its principal business is designing, constructing, repairing, overhauling, and
refueling nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S.
Government. The Company's largest single customer is the U.S. Government.
Revenues from contracts with the U.S. Government were $1,600 million (94%),
$1,753 million (94%), and $1,697 million (97%) in 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively.
2. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions in
determining the reported amounts of the Company's assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses. Reference is made to the "Revenue Recognition" section of this
footnote and Notes 10, 11, 12, and 14 for additional information on certain
estimates included in the Company's financial statements. Actual results may
differ from estimates.
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Classification
The Company's construction contracts range in duration up to a period of eight
years from the signing of the contract until delivery. Because of the varying
nature of the Company's operating cycle, and consistent with industry practice,
assets and liabilities relating to long-term contracts are classified as
current, although a portion of these amounts is not expected to be realized or
paid within one year (See Note 3).
Reclassifications
Prior years' financial statements have been reclassified where appropriate to
conform to 1997 presentations.
Revenue Recognition
The Company reports revenues and profits on its long-term contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, determined on the basis of total
costs incurred to date to estimated final total costs. Losses on contracts are
reported when first estimated. Costs on long-term contracts in process represent
recoverable costs incurred for production, allocable overhead, and, where
appropriate, general and administrative expenses. The performance of contracts
usually extends over several years, requiring periodic reviews and revisions of
estimated final contract prices and costs during the term of the contracts. The
effect of these revisions to estimates is included in earnings in the period the
revisions are made. Revenue arising from the claims process is not recognized
either as income or as an offset against a potential loss until it can be
reliably estimated and its realization is probable.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses of $263 million, $279 million, and $254
million in 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively, are included in the "Operating
Costs and Expenses" caption in the Statements of Earnings. Of the total general
and administrative expenses for 1996 and 1995, $14 million and $12 million,
respectively, represent the Company's share of its former parent's general and
administrative costs for legal, financial, communication, and other
administrative services. The Company's management believes that the allocated
general and administrative expenses reflected in the accompanying financial
statements are generally representative of the total general and administrative
costs the Company would have incurred as a separate public entity. General and
administrative expenses related to commercial products and services essentially
under commercial terms and conditions are expensed as incurred. Such charges
amounted to $31 million, $16 million, and $1 million for 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to "Operating Costs and Expenses" as
incurred. The amounts charged to operations during the years ended December 31,
1997, 1996, and 1995 were $38 million, $42 million, and $20 million,
respectively.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Income Taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes whereby it recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future
tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, based upon management's
estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized in a future period. No deferred tax valuation allowances
were recorded by the Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Contracts In Process
Only amounts billed and currently due from customers are included in the
"Accounts Receivable" caption in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Recoverable costs and accrued earnings related to long-term contracts on which
revenue has been recognized, but for which billings have not been made to the
customer, are included in the "Contracts in Process" caption (See Note 3). No
significant allowance for doubtful accounts existed as of December 31, 1997 and
1996.
Inventory
Inventory principally consists of raw materials and supplies which have not been
allocated to specific contracts. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or
market. Substantially all inventory is costed using the "last-in, first-out"
method. If the first-in, first-out or average cost method of inventory
accounting had been used by the Company for all inventory, inventory would have
been approximately $7 million and $10 million higher at December 31, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net
Property, plant, and equipment is carried at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. The Company provides for depreciation on a straight-line basis in
amounts which, in the opinion of management, are adequate to allocate the cost
of depreciable assets over their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives
for significant classes of assets are as follows.
Buildings................ 30 to 60 years
Machinery and equipment.. 8 to 45 years
Total depreciation expense was $68 million, $65 million, and $67 million for
1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. Depreciation expense is included as a
component of "Operating Costs and Expenses" in the statements of earnings.
Interest capitalized on constructed assets during the years ended December
31, 1997, 1996, and 1995 was $1 million, $3 million, and $2 million,
respectively.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company utilizes several stock-based compensation plans as an incentive to
its employees (See Note 12). Pursuant to these various plans, the Company may
grant stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation
rights, stock equivalent units, and dividend equivalent awards. Stock options
are generally awarded with exercise prices equal to the fair value of the
Company stock on the date of grant. As such, the Company does not record
compensation expense with respect to the award of such stock options. All other
awards generally result in the Company recognizing a pro rata portion of
compensation expense based on the vesting period of the award. The compensation
expense recognized generally varies based on the amount by which the current
fair value of the award exceeds the exercise price, if any, of such award.
Stockholders' Equity
At December 31, 1997, the Company had authorized (a) 70,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.01 par value, 34,864,594 of which were outstanding, along with
associated preferred stock purchase rights, (b) 10,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $.01 par value, none of which had been issued, and (c) 700,000 shares of
Series A participating junior preferred stock, $.01 par value, none of which had
been issued.
Changes in Accounting Principles
In 1997, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS")
No. 128, "Earnings per Share". The statement establishes standards for computing
and presenting earnings per share ("EPS"). The statement requires companies to
present basic EPS and diluted EPS instead of the primary and fully diluted EPS
that was previously required. Basic EPS is computed by dividing reported net
earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. This EPS computation does not include dilution.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the net
earnings of the Company (See Note 13).
In 1997, the Company adopted FAS No. 129, "Disclosure of Information about
Capital Structure". The statement maintains the existing requirements to
disclose certain information about an entity's capital structure. In addition,
it eliminates the exemption of nonpublic entities from certain disclosures
required by APB Opinion 15. Consequently, FAS No. 129 had no impact on the
Company's financial position or results of operations.
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." This statement defines a fair value
based method of accounting for stock-based awards issued to employees and
others, but also allows companies to choose to continue to measure compensation
cost for such plans as it would be measured currently, while providing that
certain additional pro forma disclosures be made. The Company has elected the
disclosure only option. Consequently, FAS No. 123 had no impact on the Company's
financial position or results of operations (See Note 12).
The Company adopted FAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," in the first quarter of
1996. FAS No. 121 established new accounting standards for measuring the
impairment of long-lived assets. The adoption of this new standard did not have
any impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Risk Management Activities
The Company periodically utilizes foreign currency contracts to hedge its
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates for firm purchase
commitments. Net gains or losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized
when the offsetting gains or losses are recognized on the hedged items. Cash
receipts or payments related to these financial instruments are classified
consistent with the cash flows from the transactions being hedged.
Foreign Currency Translation
Financial statements of equity investments in international entities are
translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date
for assets and liabilities and the weighted-average exchange rate for each
applicable period for amounts included in the statements of earnings. The amount
of cumulative translation adjustments is not significant.
3. CONTRACTS IN PROCESS
Contracts in process includes production costs and related overhead, including
general and administrative expenses allocable to U.S. Government contracts, net
of progress payments of $3.5 billion and $3.9 billion as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, respectively. Approximately $14 million and $28 million of retainages
included in contracts in process, as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
respectively, are not expected to be billed and collected within one year.
Under the contractual arrangements by which progress payments are received, the
U.S. Government asserts that it has a security interest in the Contracts in
Process identified with the related contracts.
4. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The major classes of property, plant, and equipment are as follows:
December 31,
1997 1996
Millions
Land and improvements............................... $ 28 $ 27
Buildings and improvements.......................... 1,176 1,182
Machinery and equipment............................. 430 397
------ -------
Property, plant, and equipment at cost......... 1,634 1,606
Less accumulated depreciation....................... (818) (770)
------ -------
Net property, plant, and equipment............. $ 816 $ 836
====== =======
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
5. ACQUISITION
On December 18, 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of Continental Maritime Industries, Inc. ("CMI"), a ship repair yard in San
Diego, California. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the results of operations of CMI for the period from the date of
the acquisition to December 31, 1997 are included in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. The purchase price was allocated to assets
and liabilities based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. At
closing, as defined in the agreement and plan of reorganization, CMI was
acquired through the issuance of 497,031 shares of the Company's common stock.
The excess of purchase cost over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired
of $3.9 million was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized over 15 years.
6. DETAIL OF OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:
December 31,
1997 1996
Millions
Billings in excess of costs and profits... $ 96 $ 30
Employee payroll and benefits............. 33 31
Accrued vacation.......................... 17 18
Current postretirement benefits........... 15 15
Current postemployment benefits........... 7 7
Other..................................... 7 -
------ -------
$ 175 $ 101
====== =======
7. LONG-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-Term Debt
A summary of long-term debt obligations of the Company at December 31, 1997 and
1996 is set forth in the following table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
Millions 1997 1996
--------- -------
<S> <C>
8.625% Senior Notes due December 1, 2006 $ 200 $ 200
9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2006 200 200
Term Loan 172 200
Bank Notes through April 30, 2002 4 -
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility due through 2002 - 24
One Year Revolving Credit Facility due through 1998 2 -
Less Current Maturities (30) (28)
--------- ---------
$ 548 $ 596
========= =========
</TABLE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Senior Credit Facility
On November 4, 1996, the Company entered into a $415 million senior credit
facility (the "Senior Credit Facility") consisting of a $200 million six-year
amortizing term loan (the "Term Loan") and a $215 million six-year revolving
credit facility (the "Six Year Revolving Credit Facility"). The Term Loan will
amortize in 24 quarterly installments, commencing March 31, 1997, with an annual
aggregate payment amount of $27.5 million in each of 1997 through 2001, and
$62.5 million in 2002. Of the Six Year Revolving Credit Facility, $125 million
may be used for advances and letters of credit and $90 million may be used only
for standby letters of credit. Generally, each of the Company's present and
future subsidiaries having consolidated assets exceeding $10 million, excluding
foreign subsidiaries and NNS Tanker Holding Corporation (each, a "Guarantor" and
collectively, the "Guarantors") guarantee the Senior Credit Facility. Borrowings
under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by perfected liens on substantially
all of the Company's and the Guarantors' assets (except for CMI). The security
interest in the collateral may be released if the Company meets specific
financial and other conditions.
Term Loan
The interest rates on the Term Loan vary based on the one, two, three, six,
nine, and twelve month LIBOR plus 1.125% or a base rate. The base rate is
defined as the higher of prime (as defined in the credit facility) or the
federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The weighted-average term loan interest rate at
December 31, 1997 was 7.21%.
Bank Notes
The Company also has bank notes maturing through April 30, 2002 totaling $4
million. These notes are secured by the consolidated assets of CMI and its
subsidiary, and at December 31, 1997, accrued interest at a rate of 8.5%. The
aggregate maturities applicable to the outstanding bank notes are approximately
$1 million in 1998 through 2001 with a small remainder due in 2002 (See Note
11).
Revolving Credit Facilities
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Committed Credit Facility
Term Commitments Utilized Available
<S> <C>
(As of December 31, 1997)
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility 1996-2002 $215 $87 $128
One Year Revolving Credit Facility 1997-1998 3 2 1
</TABLE>
The Six Year Revolving Credit Facility requires the payment of commitment fees
of .3% on the unused portion of the credit facility. The interest rate for the
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility can vary as described above with respect to
the Term Loan. At December 31, 1997, interest would have been calculated at the
base rate of 8.625% if a revolving credit facility balance had existed. At
December 31, 1997, the amount utilized was for standby letters of credit.
The One Year Revolving Credit Facility accrues interest at 8.5% and must be
renegotiated each year.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Debt Covenants and Restrictions
The Senior Credit Facility, Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes contain
customary covenants, including financial ratios and limitations on dividend
payments, indebtedness, liens, and corporate transactions. Debt outstanding
under the Senior Credit Facility and the Bank Notes are secured by substantially
all assets of the Company as described above. Based on 1997 financial results,
the Company was technically in default with respect to its debt covenants;
however, a waiver was granted by its lenders in March 1998 to reinstate the
Company's compliance with the provisions of the senior credit facility. The
waiver leaves the terms of these agreements essentially unchanged.
8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company's financial
instruments by class are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1997 1996
---------------------- ----------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
-------- ----- -------- -----
<S> <C>
Millions
Asset (liability) instruments
Cash and cash equivalents $ 3 $ 3 $ 1 $ 1
Accounts receivable 136 136 182 182
Trade accounts payable (151) (151) (123) (123)
Long-term debt (including current maturities)
Senior & Senior Subordinated Notes (400) (416) (400) (411)
Term Loan (172) (172) (200) (200)
Bank Notes (4) (4) - -
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility - - (24) (24)
One Year Revolving Credit Facility (2) (2) - -
Instruments with off-balance sheet risk
Foreign currency contracts - - - -
</TABLE>
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts
payable in the above table was considered to be the same as, or was not
determined to be materially different from, the carrying amount. The fair value
of short-term and long-term debt reflected in the December 31, 1997 and 1996
balance sheets are based on the market value of debt with the same or similar
maturities and interest rates.
The Company periodically utilizes foreign currency contracts to hedge certain
specific foreign currency transactions, principally the purchase of raw
materials and machinery denominated in a foreign currency. Such contracts
generally mature in one year or less and the cost of replacing these contracts
in the event of nonperformance by counterparties is not significant. At December
31, 1997 and 1996, the Company had no significant foreign currency contracts
outstanding.
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
9. INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rates for 1997, 1996, and 1995 were approximately 35%, 46%,
and 44%, respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate
in all periods compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% is principally
due to state income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences for tax.
In 1996, in connection with the spinoff, the Company entered into a tax sharing
agreement with its former parent company and El Paso Natural Gas Company. The
tax sharing agreement provides, among other things, for the allocation of tax
liabilities among the parties to the spinoff arising prior to, as a result of,
and subsequent to the spinoff. Generally, the Company is liable for taxes
imposed on the Company and its affiliates engaged in the Shipbuilding Business.
In the case of federal income taxes imposed on the combined activities of the
consolidated group of the Company's former parent, the Company is liable for
federal income taxes attributable to its activities, and has been allocated an
agreed-upon share of estimated tax payments made by the consolidated group of
the Company's former parent.
The Company's earnings before income taxes were principally domestic for all
years presented in the accompanying financial statements. Following is a
comparative analysis of the components of the provision for income taxes:
Year Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
------- ----- -----
Millions
Current-
Federal......................... $ 12 $ 49 $ 51
State........................... - 8 9
------- ------- -------
12 57 60
------- ------- -------
Deferred-
Federal......................... (33) (15) (2)
State........................... (5) 5 -
------- ------- -------
$ (26) $ 47 $ 58
======= ======= =======
Current federal tax expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995
include tax benefits of $11 million and $10 million, respectively, related to
the allocation of corporate interest expense to the Company from its former
parent (See Note 15).
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes computed using the
statutory U.S. federal income tax rate (35% for all years presented) to the
provision for income taxes reflected in the statements of earnings:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
------- ----- -----
<S> <C>
Millions
Tax expense computed at the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate................ $ (26) $ 36 $ 46
State and local taxes on income, net of Federal benefit........................... (3) 4 6
Permanent differences............................................................. 3 7 6
------- ------- -------
$ (26) $ 47 $ 58
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The components of the Company's net deferred tax liability are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1997 1996
<S> <C>
Millions
Deferred tax assets-
Postretirement benefits............................................................. $ 33 $ 43
Postemployment benefits............................................................. 15 16
Accrued vacation.................................................................... 5 5
Long-term shipbuilding contracts.................................................... 18 -
Other............................................................................... 21 47
------- -------
Total deferred tax assets...................................................... 92 111
------- -------
Deferred tax liabilities-
Tax over book depreciation.......................................................... 174 195
Long-term shipbuilding contracts.................................................... - 59
Pension............................................................................. 45 38
Other............................................................................... 22 6
------- -------
Total deferred tax liabilities................................................. 241 298
------- -------
$ 149 $ 187
======= =======
</TABLE>
10. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company has postretirement health care and life insurance plans which cover
its employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. For salaried employees,
the plans cover employees retiring from the Company on or after attaining age 55
who have had at least 10 years of service with the Company after attaining age
45. For hourly employees, the postretirement benefit plans generally cover
employees who retire pursuant to one of the Company's hourly employee retirement
plans. All of these benefits may be subject to deductibles, copayment
provisions, and other limitations, and the Company has reserved the right to
modify these benefits. The Company's postretirement benefit plans are funded on
a pay-as-you-go basis.
The funded status of the postretirement benefit plans reconciles with amounts
recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
1997 1996
<S> <C>
Millions
Actuarial present value of accumulated postretirement benefit obligation:
Retirees................................................................................ $ 133 $ 134
Fully eligible active plan participants................................................. 26 24
Other active plan participants.......................................................... 35 30
------- -------
Total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.......................................... 194 188
Plan assets at fair value.................................................................... - -
------- -------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation in excess of plan assets....................... 194 188
Unrecognized reduction of prior service obligations resulting from plan amendments........... 12 16
Unrecognized net loss resulting from plan experience and changes in actuarial assumptions.... (84) (80)
------- -------
Accrued postretirement benefit cost at December 31........................................... $ 122 $ 124
======= =======
</TABLE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The accrued postretirement benefit cost has been recorded based upon certain
actuarial estimates as described below. Those estimates are subject to revision
in future periods given new facts or circumstances.
The net periodic postretirement benefit cost consists of the following
components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
1997 1996 1995
---------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Service cost for benefits earned during the year.................................. $ 2 $ 4 $ 3
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.................... 14 15 13
Net amortization of unrecognized amounts.......................................... - 1 1
------- ------- -------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost..................................... $ 16 $ 20 $ 17
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
The initial weighted average assumed health care cost trend rate used in
determining the 1997 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 7%,
gradually declining to 5% in 2004 and remaining at that level thereafter. The
initial weighted average assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining
the 1996 and 1995 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 6% and 7%,
respectively, declining to 5% in 1997 and remaining at that level thereafter.
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point in
each year would increase accumulated postretirement benefit obligations by
approximately $7 million in 1997 and $10 million in 1996 and 1995 and would
increase the aggregate of the service cost and interest cost components of the
net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 1997, 1996, and 1995 by
approximately $1 million each year.
The discount rates (which are based on long-term market rates) used in
determining the 1997, 1996, and 1995 accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations were 7.5%, 7.75%, and 7.75%, respectively.
FAS No. 106 related to postretirement benefits and FAS No. 112 related to
postemployment benefits both require the recognition of liabilities, at present
value, for future cash outlays for these types of benefits. The Company has
recorded assets for the portion of these liabilities that is recoverable under
its backlog of government contracts. These assets totaled $49 million and $20
million as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Pension Plans
The Company has various defined benefit plans which cover substantially all of
its hourly and salaried employees. The hourly plan benefits are based primarily
on service with the Company as an hourly employee. The salaried plan benefits
are based on years of participation and final average compensation. The
Company's funding policies are to contribute to the plans amounts necessary to
satisfy the funding requirements of federal laws and regulations. Plan assets
consist principally of listed equity and fixed income securities.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Certain salaried employees of the Company participated in the former parent's
retirement plan ("FPRP") prior to the spinoff. In connection with the spinoff,
the Company's former parent became the sole sponsor of the FPRP. The benefits
accrued by Company employees in the FPRP were frozen as of December 31, 1996,
and the Company's former parent amended the FPRP to provide that all benefits
accrued through that day by Company employees were fully vested,
non-forfeitable, and the responsibility of the Company's former parent.
The funded status of the Company's plans reconcile with amounts recognized at
December 31, 1997 and 1996, as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996
------- --------
<S> <C>
Millions
Actuarial present value of benefits based on service to date and present pay
levels at September 30:
Vested benefit obligation....................................... $ (195) $ (137)
Non-vested benefit obligation................................... (33) (19)
------- -------
Accumulated benefit obligation........................................... (228) (156)
Additional amounts related to projected salary increases................. (129) -
------- -------
Total projected benefit obligation at September 30....................... (357) (156)
Plan assets at fair value at September 30................................ 410 325
------- -------
Plan assets in excess of total projected benefit obligation
at September 30..................................................... 53 169
Contributions during the fourth quarter.................................. 8 -
Unrecognized net gain resulting from plan experience
and changes in actuarial assumptions................................ (29) (46)
Unrecognized prior service obligations resulting from plan
amendments.......................................................... 91 -
Remaining unrecognized net asset at initial adoption..................... (22) (25)
------- -------
Net prepaid pension cost at December 31.................................. $ 101 $ 98
======= =======
</TABLE>
After consideration of the Company's October 1997 pension funding payment, all
plans had assets which exceeded accumulated benefits. Assets of one plan may not
be utilized to pay benefits of other plans. Additionally, the pension cost has
been recorded based upon certain actuarial estimates as described below. Those
estimates are subject to revision in future periods given new facts or
circumstances. The net prepaid pension cost at December 31, 1997 is composed of
a $112 million prepaid hourly pension plan asset and an $11 million accrued
salaried pension plan liability. The net balance at December 31, 1996 represents
a prepaid hourly pension plan asset only.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Company measures pension cost according to independent actuarial valuations.
The projected unit credit actuarial cost method is used to determine pension
cost for financial accounting purposes consistent with the provisions of FAS No.
87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Net periodic pension cost for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995 consist of the following
components:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997 1996 1995
--------------------------------
<S> <C>
Millions
Service cost--benefits earned during the year.............................. $ 25 $ 33 $ 23
Interest on prior year's projected benefit obligation...................... 20 66 52
Return on plan assets...................................................... (79) (121) (132)
Unrecognized excess of actual over expected return......................... 49 31 65
Net amortization of unrecognized amounts................................... 4 (8) (6)
-------- -------- ---------
Net pension cost........................................................... $ 19 $ 1 $ 2
======== ======== =========
</TABLE>
The weighted average discount rates (which are based on long-term market rates)
used in determining the 1997, 1996, and 1995 actuarial present value of the
benefit obligations were 7.5%, 7.75%, and 7.75%, respectively. The rate of
increase in future compensation was 4.4% in 1997 and 4.9% in 1996 and 1995. The
weighted average expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 10% in
1997, 1996, and 1995. Unrecognized prior service obligations are being amortized
on a straight-line basis over the average remaining estimated service period of
employees expected to receive benefits under the plans.
401(k) Plans
The Company sponsors the Newport News Shipbuilding Savings (401(k)) Plan for
Union Eligible Employees (the "Savings Plan") for certain of its hourly
employees. Contributions are made to the Savings Plan by participants, with the
Company providing for administration of the Savings Plan.
Subsequent to the spinoff, the Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding
Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan for Salaried Employees ("Salaried Plan"). Beginning
in 1997, the Company matched one half of the first 8% of a participant's
contribution in either cash or Common Stock at the Company's discretion. In
addition, the Company contributes a fixed percentage of each salaried employee's
salary per pay period in either cash or Common Stock, also at the Company's
discretion. The 1997 expense related to this plan was $21 million. The Company
has authorized 1,700,000 shares of Common Stock for possible Salaried Plan
contributions. Company employees as of the spinoff will be fully vested in
future matching contributions; otherwise, matching contributions will vest after
two years of service as defined in the Salaried Plan.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
ESOP
CMI (See Note 5) maintains a leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")
for substantially all of its employees. CMI makes annual contributions to the
ESOP equal to the ESOP's debt service less dividends received by the ESOP. Any
dividends received by the ESOP are used to pay debt service. The ESOP Series A
Preferred stock shares initially were pledged as collateral for its debt. The
ESOP Series A Preferred stock was exchanged for the Company's common stock
concurrent with the acquisition of CMI. As the debt is repaid, shares are
released from collateral and allocated to active employees based on the
proportion of debt service paid in the year. As shares are released from
collateral, CMI reports compensation expense equal to the current market price
of the shares. Dividends on allocated ESOP shares are recorded as a reduction of
retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are recorded as a
reduction of debt and accrued interest. ESOP compensation expense was immaterial
for the period subsequent to the acquisition. The ESOP shares on December 31,
1997 were as follows:
Allocated shares 132,613
Unallocated shares 65,916
-----------------
Total ESOP Shares 198,529
=================
Fair value of unreleased shares at December 31, 1997 $ 1,676,738
=================
12. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. 1997 Employee Stock
Purchase and Accumulation Plan ("1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan") to provide
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to purchase shares of the
Company at a 15% discount, not to exceed $21,250 in payroll deductions per year.
The Company has authorized 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock for these purposes.
During 1997, there were approximately 939,000 shares purchased by employees
under this plan. This non-compensatory plan became effective on April 1, 1997.
The Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan
("Stock Ownership Plan") for the benefit of certain salaried and management
employees. At the Company's discretion, restricted stock, performance shares,
stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock equivalent units and dividend
equivalents can be granted to eligible employees pursuant to this plan. The
Company has authorized 5,250,000 shares of Common Stock for such purposes in the
future. During January 1997, more than 2.1 million stock options were converted
from the Company's former parent's plan. In 1997, approximately 875,000 stock
options were granted. Further, approximately 680,500 performance shares, stock
incentive grants, and restricted shares were awarded in 1997.
The Company established the 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. ("1997 Stock Plan for Directors"). Half of the compensation of
non-employee directors is to be paid in the form of restricted stock. In
addition, non-employee directors receive an initial grant of 2,000 stock options
and 1,000 shares of restricted stock upon joining the Board of Directors, and an
annual grant of 1,000 stock options. The Company has authorized 75,000 shares of
Common Stock for these purposes. At December 31, 1997, there were approximately
13,200 restricted shares issued and outstanding for this plan.
The Company established a stock option plan for its active hourly employees
("Hourly Option Plan") to provide eligible employees of the Company an
opportunity to purchase shares of the Company. The Company has authorized
1,100,000 shares of Common Stock for such purposes in the future. During 1997,
there were approximately 984,500 stock options granted under this plan.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Stock options and restricted shares applicable to the plans above vest in
accordance with vesting periods set forth in the governing award agreements. The
performance shares vest after specified periods and after attaining certain
performance measures, both of which vary with each grant.
Stock option activity and exercise prices for the Stock Ownership Plan, the
1997 Stock Plan for Directors, and the Hourly Option Plan are summarized as
follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the year ended Weighted Average
December 31, 1997 Exercise Price
------------------ -----------------
<S> <C>
Number of shares under stock options:
Outstanding at beginning of year - $ -
Converted 2,143,979 14.65
Granted 1,871,350 20.21
Exercised (391,678) 14.87
Options Canceled (60,988) 14.99
--------------------
Outstanding at end of year 3,562,663 17.54
--------------------
Exercisable at end of year 983,975 14.89
====================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Weighted
Average Weighted
Number Remaining Average
Range of Outstanding at Contractual Exercise
Exercise Prices December 31, 1997 Life Price
--------------- ------------------- -------------- --------
<S> <C>
$ 12.95 - 19.88 2,575,663 7.7 years $ 14.73
24.88 - 25.00 987,000 9.8 years 24.88
--------------------
3,562,663 8.3 years 17.54
====================
Weighted
Number Average
Range of Exercisable at Exercise
Exercise Prices December 31, 1997 Price
$ 12.95 - 19.88 983,975 $ 14.89
24.88 - 25.00 - -
---------------------
983,975 14.89
=====================
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
In 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure-only option of FAS No. 123 for its
stock option plans. As of December 31, 1996, the Company's employees held
certain options in stock of the former parent that were converted to the
Company's Common Stock in early 1997 (See Note 15). For 1997, had the
compensation costs for stock options and the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under
these plans consistent with the method of FAS No. 123, the Company's net loss
and basic loss per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997
-----------------
<S> <C>
Net Loss
As reported $ (48)
Pro forma (53)
Basic Loss per share
As reported $ (1.39)
Pro forma (1.53)
</TABLE>
All options issued by the Company were issued at the estimated fair value in
effect at the date of issuance, vest ratably over the applicable vesting period,
and expire ten years after the grant date with the exception of one plan under
which the options vest two years after the award date. The fair value for
options granted in 1997 is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for all
the grants: dividend yield of 0.66%; expected volatility of 25%; risk-free
interest rates ranging from 5.7% to 6.5%; and expected life of one year after
the vesting period. The assumptions used for the fair value of the employee
purchase rights from the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan are the same as above
with the exception that the dividend yield calculated at the date of grant is
1.09% and the average life of each purchase right was assumed to be 90 days.
13. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
In 1997, the Company adopted FAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings
per common share was computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. There was no
dilutive impact on the Company's reported earnings per share for 1997 or 1996.
Since the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of its former parent prior to
the spinoff, there are no comparable shares outstanding for the period before
the spinoff.
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Government Contracting
As a general practice within the defense industry, the Defense Contract Audit
Agency (the "DCAA") and other government agencies continually review the cost
accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company,
conduct other investigations, and make specific inquiries. In the course of
those reviews and investigations, cost accounting and other issues are
identified, discussed and settled, or resolved through legal proceedings.
As with many government contractors, the government has from time to time
recommended that certain of the Company's contract prices be reduced, or costs
allocated to its government contracts be disallowed. Some of these
recommendations involve substantial amounts. In the past, as a result of such
audits and other investigations and inquiries, the Company has made adjustments
to its contract prices and the costs allocated to its government contracts.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Company is currently involved in several such audit and other investigative
proceedings with the U.S. Government. The Company is also engaged in such
settlement discussions and has filed a lawsuit concerning certain cost
accounting issues. Although the eventual outcome of these discussions, audits
and investigations, and such lawsuit cannot be determined at this time,
management believes, based on current information, that the ultimate resolution
of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
The Company and its former parent have received letters from the DCAA inquiring
about certain aspects of the spinoff, including the disposition of the former
parent's retirement plan (the "FPRP"), which covers salaried employees of the
Company. In the event there is a determination that an amount is due to the U.S.
Government related to the FPRP, the Company and its former parent will share the
obligation for such amount, plus the amount of related defense expenses, in the
ratio of 20% and 80%, respectively. In May 1997, the DCAA concluded a post-award
audit of the contract to build the aircraft carrier Reagan. The audit concerned
whether the Company's submission to the U.S. Navy of cost and pricing data in
connection with the contract was current, accurate, and complete. The Company
responded in January 1998 to a DCAA request for comments on a draft audit
report, which the DCAA is currently finalizing.
In addition to the DCAA audit, a civil investigation, also focused on the cost
and pricing data that the Company supplied to the Navy in connection with the
Reagan contract, is being conducted jointly by the Department of Defense, the
Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of
Virginia, and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. The Company has
previously responded to demands for documents in connection with the inquiry and
is now in the process of responding to Department of Justice Civil Investigative
Demands for documents and testimony from present and former Company officers and
employees. The Government has not asserted any formal claims against the Company
related to these Reagan contract matters.
Although the ultimate outcome of the FPRP and Reagan contract issues cannot be
predicted, should a successful claim be made in either matter, it could entail
an amount material to the Company's financial position and results of
operations; however, based on the Company's present understanding of the claims
the Government might assert, together with the sharing arrangement with its
former parent in connection with the FPRP, and defenses believed to be available
in connection with the Reagan contract, management believes that the final
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial position or results of operations of the Company.
During 1997, the Company submitted a request for a Shipbuilding Capability
Preservation Agreement pursuant to Section 1027 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998. This section enables the Company to
potentially recover from the Government, subject to its agreement, certain
indirect costs which have been or will be allocated to certain commercial
contracts. The Company has held various discussions with the Government related
to this request. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these or future
discussions.
Significant Estimates
From 1994 to 1996, the Company entered into fixed price contracts to construct a
total of nine Double Eagle product tankers. In January 1997, the Company, one of
the original purchasers, and Mobil Oil Corporation ("Mobil") entered into an
agreement whereby Mobil agreed to acquire the first ship. In March of 1998, the
Company announced a revised strategy for this program that will result in only
five of the remaining eight ships being built, after which the Company will
withdraw from the market. Work is substantially complete on the first three of
the remaining five ships which are scheduled to be delivered in 1998. The final
two ships will be delivered by the middle of 1999. The cumulative provision for
losses recorded on undelivered ships as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 is
approximately $325 million and $100 million, respectively. The Company has
recorded charges against
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
earnings of approximately $207 million (net of previously established reserves
of $57 million), $70 million, and $30 million in 1997, 1996, and 1995,
respectively.
During the past several months, events occurred with respect to this program
which led to increased cost estimates and the attendant charge to 1997 earnings
as described above. A majority of the estimated cost growth occurred in the
materials area, and reflects the impact of supplier services, emergent material,
and schedule changes for the recently designed domestic ships. Supplier services
cost increases were driven by significant increases in coating and painting
costs and failures by several suppliers. Emergent material costs related to
finalized design specifications, as well as unanticipated costs associated with
the extension of construction schedules, including warranty and preservation
costs and additional inspection requirements, contributed to the cost growth. In
addition, the December 1997 change in the regulation of use by industry of
paints containing Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants in shipbuilding and
ship repair, mandated that the paint applied to product tankers and the
application methodology be amended thereby increasing material and labor costs
even further.
In addition to the material problems enumerated above, the labor estimates for
the undelivered ships have also been revised upward reflecting the fact that
productivity improvements are not being achieved at the levels previously
anticipated. As a result, man-hour estimates for the ships have been increased
and learning curve projections have been modified as well. Factors contributing
to the productivity shortfall include the material issues described above,
emergent design changes, and revised ship construction and delivery schedules.
The Company intends to continue to review this program at the end of each
quarter. There can be no assurance that the estimate of costs to be incurred on
these contracts will not be revised at that time based on the facts then known
to the Company.
Litigation
The Company is a defendant in matters of varying nature related to the normal
conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these
proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on the financial position
or results of operations of the Company.
Capital Commitments
The Company estimates that expenditures aggregating approximately $35 million
will be required after December 31, 1997, to complete facilities and projects
authorized at such date, and substantial commitments have been made in
connection therewith.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
Lease Commitments
The Company holds certain equipment under long-term operating leases. Future
minimum lease payments under existing noncancelable operating leases as of
December 31, 1997, are as follows:
Year Payment
1998 $ 5 million
1999 5 million
2000 5 million
2001 4 million
2002 4 million
Thereafter 1 million
-------------
$ 24 million
=============
Rent expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995,
was $11 million, $5 million, and $14 million, respectively.
Other Commitments
In late 1997, the Company entered into a service agreement to receive software
and related services for approximately $11 million in each of the next five
years.
15. TRANSACTIONS WITH FORMER PARENT COMPANY
Corporate Debt and Interest Allocation
The historical practice of the Company's former parent was generally to incur
indebtedness for its consolidated group at the parent company level. For
financial reporting purposes, corporate debt of the former parent and its
related interest expense was allocated to the Company generally based upon the
ratio of the Company's net assets to the former parent's consolidated net assets
plus debt. Interest expense was allocated at a rate equivalent to the
weighted-average cost of all corporate debt, which was 9.2% and 7.7% for 1996
and 1995, respectively. Total pre-tax interest expense allocated to the Company
in 1996 and 1995 was $31 million and $28 million, respectively.
The Company had also been allocated tax benefits approximating 35% of the
allocated pre-tax interest expense. Although interest expense, and the related
tax effects, have been allocated to the Company for financial reporting on a
historical basis, the Company was not billed for these amounts. The changes in
allocated corporate debt and the after-tax allocated interest have been included
as a component of the Company's Combined Equity.
Notes and Advances Receivable from Former Parent
Cash Transfers from Former Parent in the Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity consist of net cash changes in notes and advances receivable with the
former parent. Historically, the former parent utilized notes and advances to
centrally manage cash funding requirements for its consolidated group.
Employee Benefits
Certain employees of the Company participated in the employee stock ownership
and employee stock purchase plans offered by its former parent prior to the
spinoff. The employee stock ownership plan provided for grants of a
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
variety of awards, including stock options and restricted stock to officers and
key employees of the Company. The employee stock purchase plan allowed employees
to purchase common stock of its former parent at a 15% discount subject to
certain thresholds. In connection with the spinoff, all options held by
employees of the Company were canceled as of December 11, 1996 and were replaced
in January 1997 with approximately 2.1 million options granted under the Newport
News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan (See Note 12).
Had compensation expense for stock-based compensation been determined in
accordance with FAS No. 123, based on fair value at the grant dates for awards
under applicable plans, the Company's pro forma net earnings for the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1995 would have been lower by approximately $3 million
($.09 per share) and $2 million, respectively.
The fair value of each option granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model based on the following assumptions for grants in 1996 and
1995, respectively: (i) risk free rates of 5.4% and 7.9%; (ii) expected lives of
5.0 years and 5.0 years; (iii) expected volatility of 26.6% and 29.0%; and (iv)
a dividend yield of 3.7% and 3.7%. The estimated weighted-average fair value per
option granted to the Company's employees during 1996 and 1995 was $10.75 and
$11.81, respectively. See Note 12 for a discussion of the Company's Stock
Compensation Plans.
Certain employees of the Company also participated in a pension plan
provided by its former parent. Reference is made to Note 11 for a further
discussion of the Company's pension plan.
Ancillary Agreements
In order to assist in the orderly transition of the Company into a separate,
publicly held company, the former parent modified, amended or entered into
certain contractual agreements with the Company in 1996. Such agreements include
the tax sharing agreement discussed in Note 9, an employee benefits agreement,
an insurance agreement, an administrative services agreement, and other
ancillary agreements.
16. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Earnings
Before
Operating Income Net
Revenues Earnings Taxes Earnings
-------- ---------- -------- --------
<S> <C>
1997
1st Quarter................................. $403 $35 $22 $13
2nd Quarter................................. 450 37 24 14
3rd Quarter................................. 423 16 2 1
4th Quarter................................. 431 (107) (122) (76)
-----------------------------------------------
$1,707 $(19) $(74) $(48)
====== ===== ===== =====
1996
1st Quarter................................. $438 $41 $32 $19
2nd Quarter................................. 477 40 32 18
3rd Quarter................................. 522 36 28 15
4th Quarter................................. 433 23 10 3
-------- ------ ------ ---
$1,870 $140 $102 $55
====== ==== ==== ===
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth a list of the executive officers of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. at March 1, 1998. Each such officer has served in the
capacities indicated below with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (or, for periods
prior to the spinoff, with the Company's former parent) since the dates
indicated below. Unless otherwise indicated all offices held are with the
Company.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Effective
Name (Age at December 31, 1997) Offices Held Date of Term
- ------------------------------- ------------- --------------
<S> <C>
William P. Fricks(53).......... Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer January 1997
President and Chief Executive Officer November 1995
President and Chief Operating Officer September 1994
Executive Vice President January 1992
Thomas C. Schievelbein(44) Executive Vice President - Operations October 1995
Vice President - Human Resources and Administration January 1995
Vice President - Strategy and Naval Program Development January 1994
Vice President - Naval Marketing March 1993
Director - Naval Marketing March 1992
Director - Marketing Field Office January 1990
David J. Anderson(48).......... Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer July 1996
Thomas J. Bradburn(54)......... Vice President - Finance and Corporate Controller September 1996
Vice President - Finance September 1986
Stephen B. Clarkson(60)........ Vice President - General Counsel and Secretary January 1991
Whylen G. Cooper(47)........... Vice President - Materials March 1997
Vice President - Sourcing November 1995
William G. Cridlin, Jr.(51).... Vice President - Marketing January 1995
Vice President - Commercial Shipbuilding April 1992
Vice President - Manufacturing September 1988
Robert L. Gunter, Jr.(41) Vice President - Surface Ships December 1997
Director - Surface Ships January 1997
Program Director - Ship Repair & FF21 Program June 1995
Program Director - FF21 Program December 1994
Program Manager - Submarine Program January 1994
Engineering Manager - Attack Submarine Program April 1993
Manager - Attack Submarine Program April 1992
T. Michael Hatfield(51)........ Vice President - Corporate Communications October 1995
Director - Public Relations November 1993
Alfred Little, Jr.(51)......... Vice President - Human Resources and EH&S July 1996
James A. Palmer(60)............ Vice President - Commercial Nuclear October 1995
Vice President - Engineering January 1995
Vice President - Aircraft Carriers April 1992
Vice President - Engineering October 1988
Marc Y. E. Pelaez(51).......... Vice President - Engineering August 1996
C. Michael Petters(38)......... Vice President - Aircraft Carriers December 1997
Director - Carrier Program January 1995
Manager - Strategy and Naval Program January 1994
Manager - Submarine Marketing March 1992
John E. Shephard, Jr.(41)...... Vice President - Manufacturing and Process Innovation March 1997
Vice President - Strategy and Process Innovation October 1995
Director - Strategic Planning August 1993
Patrick A. Tucker(50).......... Vice President - Government Relations December 1996
George A. Wade(53)............. Vice President - Submarines and Non-Nuclear Test October 1995
Vice President - Construction January 1995
Vice President - Submarines March 1993
Director - Submarine Construction April 1992
Director - Construction Engineering January 1990
D. R. Wyatt(39)................ Treasurer September 1996
Assistant Treasurer August 1995
Manager - Finance April 1989
</TABLE>
Each of the executive officers of the Company has been continuously engaged in
the business of the Company, its affiliates or predecessor companies during the
past five years except for:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Previous Employment and Office Held Period
- ----- ------------------------------------ --------
<S> <C>
David J. Anderson RJ Reynolds Corporation
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 1991 to 1996
Whylen G. Cooper GE Power Systems
Manager of Sourcing 1991 to 1995
T. Michael Hatfield Lockheed Fort Worth Co.
Director of Communications 1989 to 1993
Alfred Little, Jr. Sun Company, Inc.
Vice President - Human Resources 1992 to 1996
Director - Human Resources 1988 to 1992
Marc Y. E. Pelaez United States Navy
Chief of Naval Research 1993 to 1996
Executive Assistant Secretary to the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (RDA) 1990 to 1993
John E. Shephard, Jr. U.S. Army Reserves
Individual Mobilization Augmentee 1991 to 1993
Patrick A. Tucker Tenneco
Executive Director - Government Relations 1996
Director - Federal Relations 1994 to 1996
Counsel to Senator John Warner 1993 to 1994
Minority Staff Director and Counsel to the
U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee 1983 to 1993
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The information required is included on page 9, under the caption "Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance," of the Company's definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection
with its 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which information is incorporated
herein by reference.
The information as to Directors of the Company, required to be set forth in this
Item, is included on page 2, under the caption "Election of Directors," of the
Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with its 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is included on pages 4 and 5, under the
caption "Compensation of Directors," and pages 6 through 9, under the caption
"Executive Compensation," of the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its 1998
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which information is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item is included on pages 5 and 6, under the
caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management," of the
Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with its 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
which information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item is included on page 16, under the caption
"Certain Transactions," of the Company's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its 1998 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Financial Statements required by this Item have been included in Item
8. Refer to the "Index to Financial Statements" set forth in Item 8.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules are submitted because they are either
not applicable, not required, or not material.
3. Exhibits - See Index on pages 48 and 49.
<PAGE>
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31,1997,
Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. filed the following current reports on Form 8-K:
o October 15, 1997, reporting the announcement of a share repurchase
program for up to $10 million of the Company's common stock.
o December 11, 1997, reporting the election of two corporate officers.
o December 12, 1997 (inadvertent duplicate filing of December 11, 1997
Form 8-K).
o December 22, 1997, reporting the acquisition of CMI by the Company.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, HAS DULY
CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY
AUTHORIZED.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
Date: 3/24/98 By: /s/ William P. Fricks
----------------------------- -----------------------
William P. Fricks
Chairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT
HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND
IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- ------
<S> <C>
Chairman of the Board, President,
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ William P. Fricks and Chief Executive Officer
---------- -------------------------
William P. Fricks
Senior Vice President and
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ David J. Anderson Chief Financial Officer
---------- -------------------------
David J. Anderson
Vice President-Finance and
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ Thomas J. Bradburn Corporate Controller
---------- -------------------------
Thomas J. Bradburn
Date: 3/27/98 /s/ Gerald L. Baliles Director
---------- ----------------------------
Hon. Gerald L. Baliles
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ Leon A. Edney Director
---------- -------------------------
Leon A. Edney, Admiral (Ret.)
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ Dr. William R. Harvey Director
---------- -------------------------
Dr. William R. Harvey
Date: Director
---------- -------------------------
Dana G. Mead
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ Dr. Joseph J. Sisco Director
---------- -------------------------
Dr. Joseph J. Sisco
Date: 3/24/98 /s/ Stephen R. Wilson Director
---------- -------------------------
Stephen R. Wilson
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------- -----------
<S> <C>
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated as of December 11, 1996. (e)
3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company dated as of January 30, 1998. (a)
4.1 Specimen Certificate of the Company's Common Stock. (g)
4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of December 11, 1996 between the Company and First Chicago Trust
Company of New York, as Rights Agent. (f)
4.3 Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of March 25, 1997. (b)
4.4 Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement, dated October 9, 1997. (d)
4.5 Form of Senior Note issued on March 13, 1997 including Guarantees. (e)
4.6 Form of Senior Subordinated Note issued on March 13, 1997 including Guarantees. (e)
4.7 Senior Note Indenture dated as of November 26, 1996 among NNS, Newport News and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee. (e)
4.8 Senior Subordinated Note Indenture dated as of November 26, 1996 among NNS, Newport News
and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. (e)
4.9 First Supplemental Senior Note Indenture dated as of December 11,
1996 among NNS, the Guarantors and The Bank of New York, as
Trustee. (e)
4.10 First Supplemental Senior Subordinated Note
Indenture dated as of December 11, 1996 among NNS, the Guarantors
and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. (e)
4.11 Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 26, 1996 among NNS,
the Guarantors and the Initial Purchasers. (e)
4.12 Senior Subordinated Notes Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 26, 1996 among
NNS, the Guarantors and the Initial Purchasers. (e)
10.1 Distribution Agreement dated as of November 1, 1996 among Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and
the Company. (e)
10.2 Amendment No. 1 to Distribution Agreement dated as of December 11, 1996 by and among
Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (e)
10.3 Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 19, 1996, among El Paso
Natural Gas Company, El Paso Merger Company and Tenneco Inc. (e)
10.4 Debt and Cash Allocation Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996
among Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (e)
10.5 Benefits Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco
Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (e)
10.6 Insurance Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco
Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (e)
10.7 Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco Inc., the Company, New Tenneco Inc. and El Paso
Natural Gas Company. (e)
10.8 First Amendment to the Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco Inc., the Company, New
Tenneco Inc., and El Paso Natural Gas Company. (e)
10.9 Trademark Transition License Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 between Tenneco Management Company and the
Company. (e)
10.10 Award/Contract N00024-95-C-2106, issued by Naval Sea Systems Command to Newport News Shipbuilding for Aircraft
Carrier CVN-76. (g)
10.11 Professional Services Agreement, dated August 22, 1996 between Tenneco Business Services Inc. and the Company. (g)
10.12 Employment agreement dated as of December 12, 1996 between William P. Fricks and the Company. (e)
10.13 Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan. (c)
10.14 Amendment No. 1 to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of July 1, 1997. (d)
10.15 Amendment No. 2 to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of October 8, 1997. (d)
10.16 Amendment No. 3 to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of May 16, 1997. (d)
10.17 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. and First Amendment. (c)
10.18 Amendment No. 2 to 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc., effective as of October 9, 1997.
(d)
10.19 Deferred Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors. (c)
10.20 Deferred Compensation Plan. (c)
10.21 Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan for Key Executives and First Amendment. (c)
10.22 Amendment No. 2 to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan for Key Executives,
effective as of October 9, 1997. (d)
+21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
+24.1 Power of Attorney.
+27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
</TABLE>
+ Filed herewith.
(a) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's current report on Form
8-K, dated February 12, 1998 (File No. 1-12385).
(b) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's current report on Form
8-K, dated April 1, 1997 (File No. 1-12385).
(c) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 1-12385).
(d) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 21, 1997 (File No. 1-12385).
(e) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285).
(f) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 dated February 27, 1997 (Registration No. 333-22503).
(g) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form 10 dated October 30, 1996, as amended (Registration No. 1-12385).
Exhibits 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, 10.15, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18, 10.19, 10.20, 10.21,
and 10.22 hereto constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or
arrangements within the meaning of Item 14 (a) (3) of Form 10-K.
EXHIBIT 21, 1997 ANNUAL REPORT
FORM 10-K, COMMISSION FILE
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiaries of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Place of Percent of
(Parent and Registrant) Incorporation Voting Power
- ---------------------------------------------- -------------- ------------
<S><C>
NNS Delaware Management Company Delaware 100%
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company Virginia 100%
NNS Tanker Holding Corporation Delaware 100%
Continental Maritime of San Diego, Inc. California 100%
Newport News Reactor Services, Inc. Virginia 100%
</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ David J. Anderson
--------------------------------
David J. Anderson
Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ Thomas J. Bradburn
--------------------------------
Thomas J. Bradburn
Vice President - Finance and
Controller
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ Leon A. Edney
--------------------------------
Leon A. Edney
Director
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ William P. Fricks
--------------------------------
William P. Fricks
Chairman of the Board, President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ William R. Harvey
----------------------------
William R. Harvey
Director
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ Joseph J. Sisco
--------------------------------
Joseph J. Sisco
Director
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 24th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ Stephen R. Wilson
------------------------
Stephen R. Wilson
Director
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
-----------------
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
The undersigned does hereby make, constitute and appoint William P.
Fricks, David J. Anderson, Thomas J. Bradburn, Stephen B. Clarkson and Peter
A.V. Huegel, jointly and severally, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution in each, for me and in my name, place and stead to
execute for me and on my behalf in each or any one of my offices and capacities
with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the "Company"), as shown below, the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, with
exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, which the Company
contemplates filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying, approving and confirming all that any such
attorney-in-fact may do by virtue of these presents.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed these presents this 27th day of
March, 1998.
/s/ Gerald L. Baliles
----------------------
Gerald L. Baliles
Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Newport
News Shipbuilding Inc. Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997, and the related
Statement of Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 3
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 136
<ALLOWANCES> 0
<INVENTORY> 44
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 455
<PP&E> 1,634
<DEPRECIATION> 818
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 356
<BONDS> 400
0
0
<COMMON> 1
<OTHER-SE> 182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,476
<SALES> 1,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 1,707
<CGS> 1,729
<TOTAL-COSTS> 1,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 55
<INCOME-PRETAX> (74)
<INCOME-TAX> (26)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (48)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (48)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
