OPTION ONE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORP
8-K, EX-5.1, 2000-10-30
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
Previous: OPTION ONE MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE CORP, 8-K, 2000-10-30
Next: PROCOM TECHNOLOGY INC, 10-K, 2000-10-30




                                  EXHIBIT 5. 1


<PAGE>







                                           October 30, 2000


Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc.
600 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, Connecticut  06830

                  Option One Mortgage Loan Trust
                  Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2000-4

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Option One Mortgage Acceptance Corporation
(the "Depositor") in connection with (i) the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement,
dated October 27, 2000 (the "Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement") among Option One
Mortgage Corporation (the "Originator"), Option One Owner Trust 2000-2 or Option
One Owner Trust 2000-3 (each, a "Seller" and collectively, the "Sellers") and
the Depositor, (ii) the Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated October 27, 2000
(the "Option One Purchase Agreement"), (iii) the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2000 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),
among the Depositor as depositor, the Originator as master servicer (in such
capacity, the "Master Servicer") and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. as trustee
(the "Trustee") and the certificates issued pursuant thereto designated as
Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2000-4, (collectively, the "Certificates"),
(iv) the Underwriting Agreement, dated October 27, 2000 (the "Underwriting
Agreement"), among the Depositor, the Originator and Greenwich Capital Markets,
Inc. (the "Underwriter") pursuant to which the Class A Certificates, the Class
M-1 Certificates, the Class M-2 Certificates and the Class M-3 Certificates were
sold, (iv) the Prospectus Supplement, dated October 27, 2000 (the "Prospectus
Supplement") and the Prospectus to which it relates, dated April 20, 2000 (the
"Base Prospectus"; together with the Prospectus Supplement, the "Prospectus).
The Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, the Option One Purchase Agreement, the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Underwriting Agreement and the Prospectus
are collectively referred to herein as the "Agreements." Capitalized terms not
defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreements.
 M

<PAGE>


OOMAC, Series 2000-4                                                   Page 2
October 30, 2000

         In rendering this opinion letter, we have examined the documents
described above and such other documents as we have deemed necessary including,
where we have deemed appropriate, representations or certifications of officers
of parties thereto or public officials. In rendering this opinion letter, except
for the matters that are specifically addressed in the opinions expressed below,
we have assumed (i) the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as
originals and the conformity to the originals of all documents submitted to us
as copies, (ii) the necessary entity formation and continuing existence in the
jurisdiction of formation, and the necessary licensing and qualification in all
jurisdictions, of all parties to all documents, (iii) the necessary
authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of all documents, and the
necessary entity power with respect thereto and (iv) that there is not any other
agreement that modifies or supplements the agreements expressed in the documents
to which this opinion letter relates and that renders any of the opinions
expressed below inconsistent with such documents as so modified or supplemented.
In rendering this opinion letter, we have made no inquiry, have conducted no
investigation and assume no responsibility with respect to (a) the accuracy of
and compliance by the parties thereto with the representations, warranties and
covenants contained in any document or (b) the conformity of the underlying
assets and related documents to the requirements of the agreements to which this
opinion letter relates.

         Our opinions set forth below with respect to the enforceability of any
right or obligation under any agreement are subject to (i) general principles of
equity, including concepts of materiality, reasonableness, good faith and fair
dealings and the possible unavailability of specific performance and injunctive
relief, regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law,
(ii) the effect of certain laws, regulations and judicial or other decisions
upon the availability and enforceability of certain covenants, remedies and
other provisions, including the remedies of specific performance and self-help
and provisions imposing penalties and forfeitures and waiving objections to
venue and forum, (iii) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, reorganization,
liquidation, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium or other similar laws affecting
the rights of creditors or secured parties and (iv) public policy considerations
underlying the securities laws, to the extent that such public policy
considerations limit the enforceability of the provisions of any agreement which
purport or are construed to provide indemnification with respect to securities
law violations. Wherever we indicate that our opinion with respect to the
existence or absence of facts is based on our knowledge, our opinion is based
solely on the current actual knowledge of the attorneys in this firm who are
involved in the representation of parties to the transactions described herein.
In that regard we have conducted no special or independent investigation of
factual matters in connection with this opinion letter.

         In rendering this opinion letter, we do not express any opinion
concerning any law other than the federal laws of the United States, the laws of
the State of New York and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
We do not express any opinion with respect to the securities laws of any
jurisdiction or any other matter not specifically addressed in the opinions
expressed below.

         Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that:

         1.       The Pooling and Servicing Agreement, assuming the
                  authorization, execution and delivery thereof by the parties
                  thereto, will constitute a valid and legally binding


<PAGE>


OOMAC, Series 2000-4                                                   Page 3
October 30, 2000

                  agreement under the laws of the State of New York, enforceable
                  thereunder against the Depositor in accordance with its terms.

         2.       The Class A Certificates, the Class M-1 Certificates, the
                  Class M-2 Certificates and the Class M-3 Certificates,
                  assuming the execution, authentication and delivery in
                  accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the
                  delivery thereof and payment therefor in accordance with the
                  Underwriting Agreement, will be validly issued and outstanding
                  and are entitled to the benefits of the Pooling and Servicing
                  Agreement.

         3.       Assuming compliance with the provisions of the Pooling and
                  Servicing Agreement, for federal income tax purposes, REMIC
                  I and REMIC II will each qualify as a real estate mortgage
                  investment conduit (AREMIC@) within the meaning of the REMIC
                  Provisions of the Code, each class of Offered Certificates,
                  the Class C Certificates and the Class P Certificates will
                  represent ownership of "regular interests@ in REMIC II and
                  will generally be treated as debt instruments of REMIC II
                  and each of the components of the Class R Certificates will
                  constitute the sole class of Aresidual certificates@ in the
                  related REMIC, within the meaning of the REMIC Provisions in
                  effect on the date hereof.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion letter as an Exhibit to
the Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K and to the Registration
Statement, to the use of our name in the Prospectus and Prospectus Supplement
under the heading "Legal Matters" and to the filing of this opinion letter as an
exhibit to any application made by or on behalf of the Registrant or any dealer
in connection with the registration or qualification of the Certificates under
the securities law of any State of the United States or other jurisdiction,
without admitting that we are "persons" within the meaning of Section 7(a) or
11(a)(4) of the 1933 Act, or "experts" within the meaning of Section 11 thereof,
with respect to any portion of the Registration Statement.

                                           Very truly yours,

                                           THACHER PROFFITT & WOOD

                                           By /s/ Thacher Proffitt & Wood





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission