<PAGE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
--------------
AMENDMENT TO FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
August 15, 1997
(Date of Earliest Event Reported)
LEXINGTON HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Commission File Number 0-22261
Delaware 06-1468252
- -------- -----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) identification No.)
35 Park Place, New Britain, CT 06052
- ------------------------------ ------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 860-223-6902
<PAGE>
CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
(Item 4)
As reported on Form 8-K on August 18, 1997 , the Board of Directors of
Lexington Healthcare Group, Inc. appointed the firm of DiSanto Bertoline and
Company, P.C. on August 15, 1997 as the Company's auditors replacing the firm
of Richard A. Eisner and Company, LLP, which was dismissed by the Board of
Directors effective the same date.
The report of Richard A. Eisner and Company, LLP on the Company's June 30,
1996 financial statements contained a qualification with respect to an
uncertainty, namely the company's ability to continue as a going concern
prior to its initial public stock offering.
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996, the Company had expended a
substantial amount of current resources for fixed assets and a security
deposit. During fiscal 1997, management has continued to implement plans
including the following:
i) Materially reducing outlays for noncurrent assets.
ii) Vigorously promoting the Company's business by increasing patient
occupancy levels, as well as the businesses of it subsidiaries, to enhance
profitability and cash flows.
iii) Completing a public offering of 1,125,000 shares of common stock and
warrants as discussed above which generated proceeds of approximately $5.8
million.
There were no disagreements as to accounting policies or other financial
issues with the former accounting firm.
The change was made to obtain the services of a firm whom the registrant had
utilized previously on specific tax and reimbursement matters and whose
offices were geographically closer to the registrant's offices. The Company
believes that DiSanto Bertoline & Company, P.C. is significantly experienced
and knowledgeable with respect to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.
The response by the firm of Richard A.Eisner & Company, LLP indicating that
it agrees with the statements made in response to Item 304(a) is filed
herewith as Exhibit 16 to this Form 8-K.
In their response, the firm of Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP clarifies
that their audit report on the Company's June 30, 1996 financial statements
was not a qualified report with respect to an uncertainty, but rather it
contained an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the
company's ability to continue as a going concern. This was prior to the
completion in May, 1997 of the Company's public stock offering and the other
plans implemented by management.
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly
Date September 24, 1997 /s/ Harry Dermer
------------------ -------------------------
Harry Dermer, President
(Duly Authorized Officer)
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 16
Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
Accountants and Consultants
575 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022-2597
(212) 355-1700 Ph *** (212) 355-2414 Fax
August 19, 1997
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Lexington Healthcare Group, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We have read Item 4 of the current report on Form 8-K filed with you on
August 18, 1997 and are in agreement with the statements contained therein
except as follows:
We have no knowledge with respect to the matters discussed in the first
paragraph relating to DiSanto Bertoline and Company, P.C., and all matters
discussed in the third and fifth paragraphs.
With respect to paragraph two, we disagree with the reference made to our
report on the Company's June 30, 1996 financial statements in that our report
was not qualified with respect to an uncertainty, but rather contained an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
/s/ Richard A. Eisner and Company, LLP
---------------------------------------
Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP
