|
Previous: HEALTHGRADES COM INC, 8-K, 2000-02-08 |
Next: PBHG INSURANCE SERIES FUND INC, 497, 2000-02-08 |
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2000
Registration No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
7372 (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) |
52-1956677 (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
5457 Twin Knolls Road
Richard C. Faint, Jr.
Copies to:
Edwin M. Martin, Jr., Esquire Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP 1200 19th Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 861-3900 |
Michael P. Rogan, Esquire Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 1440 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20005 (202) 371-7000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box. [ ]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. [ ]
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Proposed | ||||
Title of Each Class of Securities | Maximum Aggregate | Amount of | ||
To Be Registered | Offering Price (1) | Registration Fee | ||
Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 | $60,000,000 | $15,840 | ||
(1) | Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted. |
Subject to Completion, dated February 8, 2000.
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Sequoia Software Corporation
[Sequoia logo]
Common Stock
This is our initial public offering of shares of common stock. We are offering shares. No public market currently exists for our shares.
We propose to list our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol SQSW.
Investing in the shares involves risks. Risk Factors begin on page 9.
Per | ||||||||
Share | Total | |||||||
Public Offering Price | $ | $ | ||||||
Underwriting Discount | $ | $ | ||||||
Proceeds to Sequoia Software Corporation | $ | $ |
Sequoia and the selling stockholders have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to additional shares of common stock on the same terms and conditions as set forth above solely to cover over-allotment, if any.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Lehman Brothers expects to deliver the shares on or about , 2000.
LEHMAN BROTHERS
SG COWEN |
WIT SOUNDVIEW |
FIDELITY CAPITAL MARKETS | |
a division of National Financial Services Corporation | |
Facilitating Electronic Distribution |
, 2000
[INSIDE FRONT COVER PAGE OF PROSPECTUS]
Front Inside Cover:
Near the top half of the page is a perspective view of a portal computer screen snapshot. Two arrows arc over from the left side of the page into the screen snapshot. Three arrows arc off the screen snapshot towards the right side of the page. In the middle of this page is the text Sequoia XML Portal Server For Creating Interactive e-Business Portals. On both the left and right side of this page are two quarter-moon shapes. At the bottom of the page, positioned between these quarter moons, is the Sequoia logo and the text SEQUOIA in all capital letters.
Gatefolds Left and Right:
The left gatefold has a portal computer screen snapshot that extends to the middle of the page with three arrows that arc onto the right gatefold. The three arrows end at the three computer screens positioned to the right of the portal computer screen snapshot. The right page has a series of three computer screens positioned to the right of the portal computer screen snaphot and a series of five cylinders to the right side of the page. The three computer screens are located from left to right, and from bottom to top. The bottom left screen is a snapshot of a travel web site. The second screen to the upper right shows a number of data entry fields. The last screen on the upper right shows a Microsoft DOS style of screen illustrating a dumb terminal. To the right of each of these three screens is the shape of a cylinder. Under each of these three cylinders, is the text: Web Sites; Web-Enabled Databases; and Legacy Systems, respectively from left to right. Two additional cylinders are located on the right side of the page, with the text e-mail Systems and Networked Documents. Near the top of the right gatefold is the text Sequoia XML Portal Server with additional text underneath of For Creating Interactive e-Business Portals. At the bottom of the left gatefold there is a pie shaped graphic with a center circle and six pie wedges circling around center. Each of the six pie wedges has text. The text of the center circle is XML with four lines of additional text centered underneath: Integration Engine; Application Server; Content Delivery Server; Rules Engine. In each of the six pie wedges around this center circle, is the following text, in a clockwise direction: Active Personalization; Smart Summaries; XML Data Entry; Portal Management Console; Meta Search; and a logo for Sequoias Xdex software. Underneath then Xdex logo is the text XML Indexing. There is a check-mark shaped shaded area that begins from the lower portion of the portal computer screen snapshot and moves across both gatefold pages.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||
Prospectus Summary | 3 | |||
Risk Factors | 9 | |||
Use of Proceeds | 22 | |||
Dividend Policy | 22 | |||
Capitalization | 23 | |||
Dilution | 25 | |||
Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data | 27 | |||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 29 | |||
Business | 44 | |||
Management | 63 | |||
Certain Transactions | 74 | |||
Principal Stockholders | 76 | |||
Description of our Capital Stock | 79 | |||
Shares Available for Future Sale | 86 | |||
Underwriting | 89 | |||
Validity of the Shares | 92 | |||
Experts | 92 | |||
Available Information | 92 | |||
Index to Financial Statements | F-1 |
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell shares of common stock and seeking offers to buy shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of common stock.
Until , 2000, all dealers that buy, sell or trade common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
You should read the following summary together with the more detailed information regarding us and our common stock being sold in this offering and our consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of Radian Systems, Inc. and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
Sequoia Software Corporation is a leading provider of XML-based Internet infrastructure software for creating interactive e-business portals. Interactive portals are a new generation of e-business solutions that are designed to tap into todays vast corporate and Internet information reservoirs in order to bring the right information to the right person at the right time. This new type of XML-based information portal is capable of intelligently aggregating data and content from disparate sources, presenting that information based upon a users profile, and enabling the user to interact with the original information source. These capabilities meet a growing need for software products that can sift through the increasing volumes of corporate and Internet-based information to identify and facilitate new e-business opportunities. From corporate intranets and extranets to Internet-based content and commerce providers, our products address a growing demand for a new breed of dynamic, flexible and standards-based e-business software that brings information and people together.
Our flagship product is the Sequoia XML Portal Server, or XPS. We believe that XPS is the first interactive portal software product that is intrinsically based on eXtensible Markup Language, or XML. By using XML, XPS is distinctively capable of integrating, extracting and aggregating user-defined data and content from any variety of disparate information sources. Once XPS aggregates information, it utilizes our patent pending XML indexing technology to provide users with context-based searching capabilities so that they can access and interact with the most relevant information available, personalized for each users individualized needs. For example, one of our customers uses XPS to keep its sales representatives better informed about their customers, prospects and products to enhance revenue opportunities. Another of our customers utilizes XPS to open its information resources to its partners and affiliates in order to broaden their market share. These examples demonstrate the flexibility and versatility of XPS to help our customers aggregate and re-use their information resources to create new e-business solutions. We have received the Microsoft Industry Solutions Award, the Deloitte & Touche Fast 500 Award, the Davies Award of Excellence and the Maryland Technology Fast 50 Award.
3
Industry Overview
The Internet has emerged as a powerful communications and commerce environment for enterprises to share and exchange business information among their employees, customers, suppliers and strategic partners. To succeed in this new environment, enterprises are adopting new Internet-based technologies to re-create themselves as e-businesses. Transforming into an e-business requires enterprises to Internet-enable existing systems, deploy new Internet-based infrastructure technologies and manage the growing volume of information flowing into and out of the enterprise. International Data Corporation, or IDC, estimates that the amount of data stored by enterprises, as indicated by worldwide multi-user disk storage, will increase from approximately 188,000 terabytes in 1999 to more than 1.9 million terabytes in 2003, representing a compound annual growth rate of 78.3%. Enterprises are devoting substantial resources to integrate and utilize this increasing flow of information. IDC estimates that worldwide spending on new Internet-based infrastructure software will grow by 31.0% annually from an estimated $9.4 billion in 1998 to $36.2 billion in 2003. We expect that this spending will be targeted at a variety of e-business strategies including e-commerce, knowledge management, supply chain management, customer support, self-service, procurement and online publishing.
The Sequoia Solution
With XPS, an enterprise can integrate multiple sources of information into a unified, personalized interface. We believe our comprehensive, integrated, interactive solution represents a fundamentally new approach to doing business and provides our clients with the following benefits:
| Streamlined e-Business Processes; | |
| Improved Decision-Making; | |
| Enhanced Revenue Opportunities; | |
| Maximized Return on e-Business Technology Investment; | |
| Flexible, Scalable, XML-based, Open Architecture; and | |
| Secure Information Sharing. |
We believe these aspects of XPS improve productivity, reduce costs, encourage growth, and create a more cost-effective solution for our customers.
The Sequoia Strategy
Our goal is to be the market leader for XML-based, Internet infrastructure software for creating e-business solutions. Our solution consists of XML-based Internet infrastructure software and services that enable e-businesses to create, deploy and manage interactive portals. The key elements of our business strategy are to:
| Maintain and Extend Leadership in XML-based Interactive Portal Software Market; | |
| Expand Product Offerings; | |
| Further Develop Indirect Distribution Channels; | |
| Extend Our Strategic Relationships, Including Our Relationship with Microsoft; and | |
| Leverage Radian Systems Customer Base to Enhance Sales of XPS. |
4
Acquisition
On July 1, 1999, we acquired Radian Systems, Inc. for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.0 million. Radian Systems develops, produces and markets information management software. In 1998, Radian Systems began focusing on XML-based technologies and selected our product as the center of their new product strategy, entering into a business partner agreement with us to resell our XML-based software. With this acquisition, we increased our sales force and customer base and acquired an XML-based technology for the extraction and transformation of database information. Radian Systems customers include Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota, GE Power Generation and Prudential Insurance. We expect to continue to leverage Radian Systems customer relationships to increase our revenue growth.
5
The Offering
Common stock offered by Sequoia Software Corporation | shares | |
Common stock outstanding after this offering | shares | |
Use of proceeds | We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to fund the development of our products and services, expand our sales force and sales office locations, fund potential selected acquisitions and cover other general corporate expenses, including the funding of operating losses. See Use of Proceeds. | |
Dividend policy | We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock. We plan to retain earnings for use in the operation of our business and to fund future growth. | |
Proposed Nasdaq National Market symbol | SQSW |
The calculation of the number of shares outstanding after this offering is based on the number of shares outstanding on , 2000 and does not reflect shares that may be issued upon the exercise of options and warrants.
In addition to the shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering, we may issue:
| shares under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, or our stock option plan, none of which have been granted; and | |
| 1,820,919 shares underlying outstanding options as of February 7, 2000 at a weighted average exercise price of $1.28 per share. |
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes that:
| the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters by us and certain selling stockholders is not exercised; | |
| the conversion of all shares of our outstanding series A, series B, series C, and series D redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock occurs immediately upon completion of this offering; and | |
| a one-for-four split of our capital stock has been effected. |
6
Summary Consolidated Financial Data
The following table summarizes the financial data of our business. On July 1, 1999, we acquired Radian Systems. We accounted for this acquisition using the purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations of Radian Systems are included in our consolidated financial data for the period from July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999. You should also read Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the audited financial statements and related notes of Radian Systems included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 875 | $ | 1,787 | $ | 3,676 | $ | 4,011 | $ | 8,398 | ||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 540 | 1,091 | 1,825 | 2,816 | 6,080 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 335 | 696 | 1,851 | 1,195 | 2,318 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 267 | 816 | 2,379 | 4,073 | 14,619 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 68 | (120 | ) | (528 | ) | (2,878 | ) | (12,301 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) | (10 | ) | (22 | ) | (20 | ) | (79 | ) | (491 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 58 | (142 | ) | (548 | ) | (2,957 | ) | (12,792 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | $ | 58 | $ | (265 | ) | $ | (739 | ) | $ | (6,527 | ) | $ | (21,306 | ) | ||||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders(1) | $ | | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (2.57 | ) | $ | (6.54 | ) | ||||||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (1) | | 2,537 | 2,537 | 2,539 | 3,260 |
(1) | Prior to February 1996, we operated as a limited liability company and therefore we have not presented share and per share data for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
7
The following table summarizes consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 1999 and as adjusted to give effect to the conversion of our preferred stock into common stock and the receipt of $ in net proceeds from this offering based on an assumed offering price of $ per share. See Use of Proceeds and Capitalization.
As of December 31, 1999 | ||||||||
Actual | As Adjusted | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,903 | $ | |||||
Working capital | 10,654 | |||||||
Total assets | 22,283 | |||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion | 474 | |||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock | 43,479 | |||||||
Total common stockholders equity (deficit) | (26,539 | ) |
We have not presented our redeemable convertible preferred stock as part of our stockholders equity because it is mandatorily redeemable after November 2004. All of these shares will automatically convert into common stock upon consummation of this offering.
Sequoia and the Sequoia logo as displayed on the cover of this prospectus are our trademarks. Trademark registration applications are pending for Sequoia XML Portal Server and Xdex. All other trade names, trademarks and service marks used in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
Principal Offices
Our principal executive offices are located at 5457 Twin Knolls Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045 and our telephone number is (410) 715-0206. Our Web site address is www.sequoiasoftware.com. We do not intend for the information on our Web site to constitute part of this prospectus.
8
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below before buying shares in this offering. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business could be materially harmed. The trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to other information contained in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes and the financial statements of Radian Systems and related notes.
Risks Related to Our Business
We are in an early stage of development and have a limited operating history, and as a result, you may have difficulty evaluating our business and operating results.
We have a limited operating history and cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful. We commenced operations in 1992 and commercially released our first XML-based software product in November 1998. An investor in our common stock must consider the risks and uncertainties frequently encountered by early stage companies in new and rapidly evolving markets, including:
| our substantial dependence on our XPS software product and related services, from which we expect to derive substantially all of our revenues and which have limited market acceptance to date; | |
| our need to introduce new software products and services to respond to technological and competitive developments and customer needs; | |
| our ability to manage our anticipated growth; | |
| our need to expand our distribution capability through our direct sales organization and through third-party distributors and system integrators; | |
| our ability to respond to competitive developments; and | |
| our dependence on our current executive officers and key employees. |
We have a history of losses, we expect future losses, and we may not be profitable or maintain profitability in the future.
We have incurred substantial net losses in each fiscal quarter since September 30, 1996 and do not expect to achieve profitability in the foreseeable future. For the year ended December 31, 1999, we incurred net losses of approximately $12.8 million and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $26.6 million at December 31, 1999. We cannot assure you that our revenues will grow or that we will achieve or maintain profitability in the future. Given the level of our planned operating and capital expenditures, we expect to incur losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future. To increase revenue and achieve profitability, we depend on our ability to continue to, among other things:
| increase market acceptance of our product; | |
| develop new products and technologies more rapidly than our competitors; | |
| offer high quality customer service and support; |
9
| attract, integrate, motivate and retain qualified personnel; | |
| successfully implement our distribution strategy; | |
| build our financial and operational infrastructure and otherwise manage growth; | |
| develop and maintain awareness of our brands; and | |
| maintain and establish relationships with strategic partners. |
There can be no assurance that we will successfully implement these strategies. As a result, we may not be able to increase revenue or achieve profitability on a quarterly or an annual basis, which may restrict our ability to pursue our business strategy. Even if we ultimately do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our ability to increase revenue and achieve profitability will be affected by other risks and uncertainties described in this section and in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
A significant amount of our business comes from a concentrated group of customers and any decrease in revenue from these customers could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our top ten customers for the year ended December 31, 1999 accounted for 73.0% of revenues. Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota accounted for 23.8% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999 and The State of Texas accounted for 12.2% of our revenues in the same period. We expect that a limited number of customers will continue to represent a material percentage of revenues for the foreseeable future. The loss of a major customer, or fewer or smaller orders by existing customers, could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. In addition, any significant delays in or cancellations of a major customers development projects or delays in or cancellations of new product announcements and releases by us could result in smaller or canceled orders for our products and could materially affect our financial condition or results of operations.
Our operating results are subject to fluctuations and, if we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors, our stock price could decline significantly.
Our quarterly revenue and operating results are difficult to predict and are likely to fluctuate significantly from quarter-to-quarter. Our quarterly results of operations have varied in the past, and you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of our future performance. In some future periods, our results of operations are likely to be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In this event, the price of our common stock would likely decline. Factors that have either caused our results to fluctuate in the past or that are likely to affect us in the future include the following:
| the size, timing and contractual terms of sales of our products and services due to the unpredictable sales cycle for our products; | |
| technical difficulties in our software that could delay product shipments or increase the costs of introducing new products; | |
| introductions of new products or new versions of existing products by us or our competitors; |
10
| our ability and the ability of our partners to implement products for our customers; | |
| changes in our mix of revenues generated from product sales and services; and | |
| changes in our mix of sales channels through which our products and services are sold. |
We depend on our XPS software product and related services and any decrease in revenue from this product and related products and services could have an adverse effect on our business and our financial performance.
We expect to derive substantially all of our revenues from the sale of our XPS software product and related services. We expect revenues from this product and related products and services to account for substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future. As a result, factors adversely affecting the pricing or demand for our XPS software product and related products and services, such as competition and technological change, could materially harm our business. We expect to continue to be dependent on XPS and related products and services in the foreseeable future, and any factor adversely affecting the market for portal software in general, or our software in particular, would adversely affect our ability to generate revenues. Our future financial performance will depend in large part on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of our products and product enhancements in a timely and cost effective manner. After the offering, we expect to commit significant resources to market and further develop the XPS software product and related products and services and enhance the brand awareness of XPS. The market for our software may not continue to grow or may grow at a slower rate than we expect. Furthermore, the market may not accept our products and services. If this market fails to grow or grows more slowly than we anticipate, or if the market fails to accept our products and services, our business could suffer.
Capacity restrictions of our software could reduce the demand for and utility of our products.
The boundaries and capacity of our XPS software, in terms of numbers of concurrent users or interactions, are unknown because, to date, no customer or testing environment has reached these boundaries. The capacity boundaries of XPS may, at some future time, be reached and, when reached, may be insufficient to enable some of our customers to achieve their desired levels of information aggregation and interaction. We may lose customers or fail to gain new customers if the capacity boundary of XPS limits the ability of our customers to achieve expected levels of information aggregation and interaction.
Our failure to obtain or maintain third-party licenses could harm our business.
We currently, and expect to continue to, incorporate into our pre-packaged software certain third-party software that enables the implementation of our products. In addition, we license certain software technology used to develop our software. The loss or inability to maintain any of these software licenses could result in delays or reductions in product shipments until equivalent software could be identified and licensed or compiled, which could adversely affect our business.
11
Our failure to manage our growth could adversely affect our business.
The planned expansion of our operations will place a significant strain on our management, financial controls, operations systems, personnel and other resources. Our ability to manage our future growth, should it occur, will depend in large part upon a number of factors including our ability to rapidly:
| build and train our sales and marketing staff to create an expanding presence in the rapidly evolving interactive e-business portal market, and keep them fully informed over time regarding the technical features, issues and key selling points of our products; | |
| develop our customer support capacity as sales of our products grow, so that we can provide customer support without diverting engineering resources from product development efforts; and | |
| expand our internal management and financial controls significantly, so that we can maintain control over our operations and provide support to other functional areas within Sequoia as the number of our personnel and size of our organization increases. |
The variable sales cycles of our products could cause significant fluctuation in our quarterly results, which could result in volatility in the price of our stock.
The typical sales cycle of our software is unpredictable and generally involves a significant commitment of resources by our customers. A customers decision to license our software generally involves the evaluation of the available alternatives by a significant number of personnel in various functional and geographic areas and is subject to delays over which we may have little or no control, including budgeting constraints, internal purchase review procedures and the inclusion or exclusion of our products on customers approved standards list. Accordingly, we typically must expend substantial resources educating prospective customers about our software solutions. Therefore, the length of time between the date of initial contact with the potential customer and the execution of a software license agreement typically ranges from three to six months and is subject to delays over which we may have little or no control. This cycle may lengthen in the future. As a result, our ability to predict the timing and amount of specific sales is limited and any delay or failure to complete one or more large transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business and could cause operating results to vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter, which could result in volatility in our stock price.
XPS is based in large part on XML, which has not yet achieved broad market acceptance and, if broad market acceptance for XML does not develop, our business could be harmed.
XPS is intrinsically-based in large part upon XML, or eXtensible Markup Language, an emerging standard for sharing data over the Internet. While we anticipate that XML will achieve broad market acceptance in the near future, it is possible that a competing standard perceived to be superior could replace XML, in which case the market may not accept an XML-based product. If a new standard were perceived to be superior, our software might not be compatible with the new standard or we might not be able to develop a product using this standard in a timely manner. Consequently, a failure of XML-based products to achieve
12
Our software products rely on our intellectual property, and any failure by us to protect our intellectual property could enable our competitors to market products with similar features that may reduce demand for our products.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as those in the United States. Our success and ability to compete depend substantially upon our internally developed technology, which is incorporated in the source code for our products. We protect our intellectual property through a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark law. We presently have two patent applications and one provisional patent application pending in the United States. We have two trademark registrations and two trademark applications pending in the United States. In addition, Radian Systems, our wholly owned subsidiary, has three intent-to-use trademark applications and one trademark application pending in the United States. We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and control access to our source code and other intellectual property and the distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. These measures afford only limited protection and may be inadequate. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology or design around the copyrights and trade secrets we own.
Our products employ technology that may infringe the proprietary rights of others, and we may be liable for significant damages as a result.
We expect that software products may be increasingly subject to third-party infringement claims as the number of competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments grows and overlaps. We believe that our products do not employ technology that infringes any proprietary rights of third parties. Nevertheless, third parties may claim that we infringe their intellectual property rights. Regardless of whether these claims have any merit, they could:
| be time-consuming to defend; | |
| result in costly litigation; | |
| divert our managements attention and resources; | |
| cause product shipment delays; or | |
| require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. |
A successful claim of product infringement against us or our failure or inability to license the infringed or similar technology could damage our business because we would not
13
Our software products are complex and may contain unknown defects that could harm our reputation, result in product liability or decrease market acceptance of our products.
Our software products are complex, and may contain undetected errors or result in failures, which are not detected until after commencement of commercial shipments. Any of these errors could be significant and could harm our business and ongoing results. Any significant errors may result in:
| costly litigation; | |
| diversion of managements attention and resources; | |
| damage to our reputation; | |
| increase in our product development costs; | |
| loss of sales; or | |
| delay in market acceptance of our products. |
In addition, the sale and support of our products may entail the risk of product liability or warranty claims based on damage incurred by our customers due to such errors or failures. In addition, the failure of our products to perform to customer expectations could give rise to warranty claims. Although we carry general liability insurance, our current insurance coverage may be insufficient to protect us from all liability that may be imposed under these types of claims.
Intense competition and consolidation in our industry could create stronger competitors and harm our business.
The market for our products is intensely competitive, highly fragmented, characterized by rapid technological change and significantly affected by new product introductions. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, greater name recognition, a broader range of products to offer and a larger installed base of customers than us, any of which could provide them with a significant competitive advantage.
We expect to face increased competition in the future from our current competitors. In addition, new competitors, or alliances among existing and future competitors, may emerge and rapidly gain significant market share. We also may face increased competition from existing large business application software vendors that may broaden their product offerings to include portal software. Their significant installed customer bases and abilities to offer a
14
| other vendors of software that provide e-business interactive portal software solutions; | |
| developers of software that address only certain technology components of portal software (e.g., enterprise application integration); and | |
| in-house development efforts by potential clients or partners. |
We need to expand our sales and distribution capabilities.
We need to substantially expand our direct and indirect sales and distribution efforts, both domestically and internationally, in order to increase market awareness and sales of our software and services. We continue to expand our direct sales force and plan to hire additional sales personnel. Competition for qualified sales and marketing personnel is intense, and we might not be able to hire and retain adequate numbers of such personnel to maintain our growth. We also plan to expand our relationships with system integrators, enterprise software vendors and other third-party resellers to further develop our indirect sales channel. As we continue to develop our indirect sales channel, we will need to manage potential conflicts between our direct sales force and third-party reselling efforts.
Our revenues could decline if we do not develop and maintain successful relationships with indirect sales channel partners, including systems integrators and complementary technology vendors.
We pursue business alliances with indirect channel partners to endorse our products, implement our software, provide customer support services, promote and resell products that integrate with our products and develop industry-specific software products. These alliances provide an opportunity to license XPS to our partners installed customer bases. In many cases, these parties have established relationships with our existing and potential customers and can influence the decisions of these customers. We rely upon these companies for recommendations of our products and related services during the evaluation stage of the purchasing process, as well as for implementation and customer support services. A number of our competitors have stronger relationships with indirect channel partners who, as a result, may be more likely to recommend our competitors products and services. In addition, some of our competitors have relationships with a greater number of these indirect channel partners and, therefore, have access to a broader base of customers. If we are unable to establish, maintain and strengthen these relationships, we will have to devote substantially more resources to the selling and marketing, implementation and support of our products. Our efforts may not be as effective as these indirect channel partners, which could significantly harm our operating results.
The development of international operations will cause us to face additional risks.
We intend to expand our international sales efforts in the future. We have very limited experience in marketing, selling and supporting our software and services abroad. Expansion of our international operations will require a significant amount of attention from our management and substantial financial resources. Although currently our international presence is not material, if we are unable to grow our international operations successfully
15
| unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, taxes, trade laws and tariffs; | |
| restrictions on repatriation of earnings; | |
| differing intellectual property rights; | |
| differing labor regulations; | |
| changes in a specific countrys or regions political or economic conditions; | |
| greater difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations; and | |
| fluctuating currency exchange rates. |
If we are unable to attract and retain key management and personnel, our business may suffer.
We depend to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of our key executive officers and our employees, including without limitation: Richard C. Faint, Jr., our chairman of the board and chief executive officer; Mark A. Wesker, our president and chief operating officer; Gregory G. Heard, our chief financial officer who joined us in January 2000; Kenneth E. Tighe, our executive vice president of sales, the members of our research and development staff and a number of other key management, sales, support, technical and services personnel. Qualified personnel are in great demand throughout the software industry, and our future success depends in large part on our ability to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled employees and the ability of our executive officers and other members of senior management to work effectively as a team. The loss of the services of any executive officer or the failure to attract and retain the highly trained technical personnel that are integral to our sales, product development, service and support teams, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If we undertake acquisitions, they may be expensive and disruptive to our business and could have an adverse effect on our business, future operations and stock price.
We may from time to time purchase or make investments in companies, products or technologies that differ from our core business. If we purchase a company, we could have difficulty in assimilating that companys technologies, employees and operations. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired company may decide not to work for us. These difficulties could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses. We also expect that we would incur substantial expenses if we acquired other businesses or technologies. Furthermore, we may use the proceeds of this offering, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any future acquisitions. If we issue additional equity securities, our stockholders could experience dilution and the market price of our stock may decline. We currently have no agreements or understandings regarding any future acquisitions.
16
We may need significant additional funds which we may not be able to obtain.
We may require additional capital to finance our growth or to fund acquisitions or investments in complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. This additional financing may not be available to us on a timely basis if at all, or, if available, on terms acceptable to us. Moreover, additional financing may cause dilution to existing stockholders.
All Year 2000 problems may not have been addressed by our suppliers and any service interruption we experience as a result of these problems may cause us to lose customers.
The Year 2000 issue generally describes the various problems that may result from the improper processing of dates and date-sensitive transactions by computers and other equipment as a result of computer hardware and software using two digits, rather than four digits, to identify the year in a date. Any computer programs or systems of our suppliers that have date-sensitive software may recognize a date using 00 as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. While we have experienced no Year 2000 issues to date, and we are not aware of any material issues for our suppliers, we are continuing to evaluate and determine whether our significant suppliers are in compliance or have appropriate plans to remedy Year 2000 issues when their systems interact with our systems. We do not expect that this will have a material impact on our operations. However, there can be no assurance that the systems of other companies on which we rely are Year 2000 compliant, that another companys failure to successfully convert, or that another companys conversion to a system incompatible with our systems, would not have an impact on our operations. The failure of our principal suppliers to be Year 2000 compliant could result in delays in service deliveries from those suppliers and materially impact our ability to do business.
In addition, our customers and their business partners hardware operating systems and other software applications must operate effectively for them to use our software effectively. If these systems or applications are not Year 2000 compliant, our customers and their business partners may not be able to use our software. We cannot predict the extent to which our customers and their business partners systems and application are Year 2000 compliant, and our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed.
Risks Related to Our Industry
The markets in which we compete are undergoing rapid changes, and our failure to keep up with such changes could adversely affect our business.
The markets for our products and services are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer needs, emerging competition and frequent new product introductions and improvements. We expect that the rapid evolution of Internet-based applications and standards as well as general technology trends such as changes in or introductions of operating systems, will require us to adapt our software products to remain competitive. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to:
| develop or acquire new products and services that meet changing customer needs; | |
| improve our existing products and services; |
17
| continue to develop our strategic and technical expertise; | |
| advertise and market our products and services; and | |
| influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other changes. |
This must be accomplished in a timely and cost-effective manner. We must also be able to support a range of changing computer software, hardware platforms and customer preferences. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop new products to address new industry standards and customer needs, respond to technological developments, or develop solutions to satisfy our customers. Our inability to respond timely and successfully to technological developments and changes could hurt our competitive position or render our products or technologies noncompetitive or obsolete.
We depend on the speed and reliability of the Internet and our customers internal networks.
The recent growth in Internet traffic has caused frequent periods of decreased performance for many Internet users. If Internet usage continues to grow rapidly, its infrastructure may not be able to support these demands and its performance and reliability may decline. If outages or delays on the Internet occur frequently or increase in frequency, e-business could grow more slowly or decline, which may reduce the demand for our software. The ability of our products to satisfy our customers needs is ultimately limited by and depends upon the speed and reliability of both the Internet and our customers internal networks. Consequently, the emergence and growth of the market for our software depends upon improvements being made to the entire Internet as well as to our customers networking infrastructures to alleviate overloading and congestion. If these improvements are not made, the ability of our customers to utilize our solution will be hindered, and our business, operating results and financial condition may suffer.
Internet-related laws could adversely affect our business.
Regulation of the Internet is largely unsettled. It may take years to determine whether and how existing laws including those governing intellectual property, privacy, libel and taxation apply to the Internet. The adoption of laws or regulations that increase the costs or administrative burdens of doing business using the Internet could cause companies to seek an alternative means of transacting business. If the adoption of new Internet laws or regulations causes companies to seek alternative methods for conducting business, the demand for our software could decrease and our business could be adversely affected.
Increased security risks of e-business may deter future use of our software and services.
A fundamental requirement for e-business is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may result in a compromise or breach of the security features contained in our software or the algorithms used by our customers and their business partners. This could make it difficult to protect content and transactions on Internet e-commerce marketplaces or proprietary information in our customers and their business partners databases. Anyone who is able to circumvent security measures could misappropriate proprietary, confidential customer information or cause interruptions in our
18
Lack of growth or decline in Internet usage or the lack of acceptance of Internet commerce could adversely affect our business.
Our products enhance companies ability to transact business and conduct operations utilizing the Internet. Therefore, our future success will depend substantially upon the widespread acceptance and use of the Internet as an effective medium for commerce by consumers, business and business applications. Rapid growth in the use of the Internet and other online services is a recent development and we are unsure whether that acceptance and use will continue to develop or that a sufficiently broad base of consumers will adopt and continue to use the Internet and other online services as a medium of commerce. To be successful, we must rely on consumers and businesses, who have historically used traditional means of commerce to purchase products, accepting and utilizing new ways of conducting business and exchanging information over the Internet.
In addition, the Internet may not be accepted as a viable commercial marketplace for a number of reasons, including:
| potentially inadequate development of the necessary network infrastructure; | |
| delayed development of enabling technologies and Internet performance improvements; | |
| actual or perceived lack of security of information; | |
| lack of access and ease of use; | |
| inconsistent quality of service and lack of availability of cost-effective, high speed service; | |
| excessive governmental regulation; and | |
| uncertainty regarding intellectual property rights. |
If, for these reasons or others, the Internet does not become a viable and substantial commercial medium, our business would be harmed.
Risks Related to This Offering
Our management has broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering, which could adversely affect our business.
We intend to use the proceeds of the offering to fund ongoing operations, to fund possible future acquisitions and to fund the costs of developing our products and services, as
19
Our executive officers and directors are able to exercise significant influence over our company, which could adversely affect our business and depress our stock price.
After this offering, our executive officers and directors will continue to control approximately % of our common stock and will exercise significant influence over stockholder voting matters which will limit the influence of our new stockholders. If our officers and directors act together, they will be able to influence the composition of the board of directors and will continue to have significant influence over our affairs in general.
After the offering, some of our stockholders may be able to control all matters submitted for stockholder approval, and you will be subject to their decisions.
Some of our stockholders own a large enough stake in us to have a significant influence on the matters presented to stockholders. As a result, these stockholders may be able to control all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, the approval of significant corporate transactions, such as any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and the control of our management and affairs. Accordingly, that concentration of ownership may delay, defer or prevent a change of control of our company, impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving our company or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock. See our discussion under the caption Principal Stockholders for more information regarding ownership of our outstanding shares.
Investors will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $ in the book value of their investment.
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution because the price that you pay will be substantially greater than the net tangible book value per share of the shares you acquire. This dilution is due in large part to the fact that our earlier investors paid substantially less than the public offering price when they purchased their shares. You will experience additional dilution upon the exercise of stock options and warrants to purchase common stock.
Our stock does not have a trading history and may be extremely volatile because we operate in a rapidly changing industry.
The trading price of our common stock is likely to be volatile. The stock market has experienced extreme volatility and this volatility has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. We cannot be sure that an active public market for our common stock will develop or continue after this offering. Investors may not be able to sell their common stock at or above our initial public offering price or at all. Prices for the
20
Future sales of our common stock may lower our stock price.
If our existing stockholders sell a large number of shares of our common stock, the market price of the common stock could decline significantly. The perception in the public market that our existing stockholders might sell shares of common stock could depress our market price. Immediately after this offering, approximately shares of our common stock will be outstanding.
Of these shares, of the shares included in this offering will be available for immediate resale in the public market. The remaining shares, or % of our total outstanding shares, will become available for resale in the public market as shown on the chart below. All of these remaining shares are subject to lock-up agreements restricting the sale of such shares for 180 days from the date of this prospectus. However, the underwriters may waive this restriction and allow these stockholders to sell their shares at any time.
Number of Shares | ||||
% of Outstanding | Date of First Availability for Resale | |||
/ % | Immediately after the date of this prospectus | |||
/ % | 90 days after the date of this prospectus | |||
/ % | After 180 days from the date of the prospectus, subject, in some cases, to volume limitations |
We have implemented certain anti-takeover provisions.
At the time we complete this offering, our charter and our bylaws, in conjunction with Maryland law, will contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third-party to obtain control of Sequoia even if doing so would be beneficial to stockholders. For example, our charter will provide for a classified board of directors and give the board of directors the ability to expand its size and fill any vacancies without stockholder approval.
Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain.
We make forward-looking statements in the Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors, Use of Proceeds, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business sections and elsewhere in this prospectus. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations, intentions and assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. We generally intend the words expect, anticipate, intend, plan, believe, seek, estimate and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those described in this Risk Factors section, our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
21
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate the net proceeds from the offering to be approximately $ million at an initial public offering price of $ per share and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders if the underwriters over-allotment option is exercised. While we have not determined the specific allocation of the net proceeds of this offering, we currently intend to use the net proceeds to fund the development of our products and services, to expand our sales force and sales office locations and to fund other general corporate expenses including operating losses. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify all of the particular uses for the general corporate purposes portion of our proceeds. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds.
As part of our strategy, we may make acquisitions and a portion of the net proceeds from the offering may be used for such purposes. We have no definitive agreement with respect to any acquisition, although we regularly engage in discussions with other companies and assess opportunities on an ongoing basis. We may be required to obtain additional financing to fund the development of our products and services if, among other reasons, we use a portion of the proceeds from the offering to fund acquisitions, or if our plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate. We cannot assure you that such additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.
We intend to invest any remaining proceeds from the offering in short-term, interest bearing, investment grade marketable securities.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock nor do we have plans to do so in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of any dividends in the future will be determined by our board of directors, in its discretion, and will depend on a number of factors, including our earnings, capital requirements and overall financial condition. In addition, our ability to declare and pay dividends is substantially restricted under our loan agreements with Silicon Valley Bank.
22
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 1999:
| on an actual basis; | |
| on a pro forma basis to give effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock into shares of common stock, effective upon the closing of this offering; and | |
| on a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect our receipt of the estimated net proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share and after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and offering expenses payable by us. |
Please read the capitalization table together with the sections of this prospectus entitled Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the financial statements of Sequoia and Radian Systems included in this prospectus.
As of December 31, 1999 | ||||||||||||||
Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||
Actual | Pro Forma | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share and | ||||||||||||||
per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 474 | $ | 474 | $ | |||||||||
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 8,064,877 shares authorized, 2,016,221 issued and outstanding actual; no shares issued and outstanding pro forma and pro forma as adjusted | 8,065 | | ||||||||||||
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 9,647,920 shares authorized, 2,411,984 issued and outstanding actual; no shares issued and outstanding pro forma and pro forma as adjusted | 9,648 | | ||||||||||||
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 26,092,770 shares authorized, 6,210,258 shares issued and outstanding actual; no shares issued and outstanding pro forma and pro forma as adjusted | 25,766 | | ||||||||||||
Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 6,817,239 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted | | | ||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit): | ||||||||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,714,665 shares authorized; 3,960,532 shares issued and outstanding actual; 14,598,995 shares issued and outstanding pro forma and issued and outstanding pro forma as adjusted | 4 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | | 43,468 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (26,557 | ) | (26,557 | ) | ||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) | (26,539 | ) | 16,940 | |||||||||||
Total capitalization | $ | 17,414 | $ | 17,414 | $ | |||||||||
23
We expect there to be shares of our common stock outstanding after the offering. In addition to these shares, we may issue additional shares of our common stock under the following plans and arrangements:
| 1,647,669 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options as of December 31, 1999 at a weighted average exercise price of $0.69 per share; | |
| 390,286 additional shares of common stock authorized for granting as stock options by the board of directors as of December 31, 1999; | |
| 312,952 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants for series C redeemable convertible preferred stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.11 per share and conversion of shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to an equal number of shares of common stock; | |
| 1,704,311 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants for series D redeemable convertible preferred stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.50 per share and conversion of shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock shares to an equal number of shares of common stock; | |
| 222,303 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants to purchase common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.50 per share; and | |
| shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. |
We have not presented our series A, series B and series C redeemable convertible preferred stock as part of our stockholders equity because they are mandatorily redeemable after November 2004. All of these shares will automatically convert into common stock upon consummation of this offering.
24
DILUTION
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net pro forma tangible book value per share of your common stock.
We calculate dilution to new investors by subtracting pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock after this offering from the per share price paid by new investors in this offering. We calculate net pro forma tangible book value per share by subtracting liabilities from total tangible assets and then dividing that number by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 1999, after giving effect to the automatic conversion of preferred stock upon consummation of this offering. The following table illustrates the per share dilution to investors in this offering:
Initial Public Offering Price Per Share | $ | ||||||||
Net tangible book value as of December 31, 1999. | $ | 0.83 | |||||||
Pro forma increase attributable to new investors in this offering | |||||||||
Pro forma net tangible book value after this offering | |||||||||
Pro forma dilution to new investors | $ | ||||||||
The following table summarizes on a pro forma basis as of December 31, 1999, after giving effect to this offering, the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and the average consideration paid per share by existing stockholders and by new investors in this offering:
Shares Purchased | Total Consideration | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | Price Per Share | |||||||||||||||||
Existing stockholders | 14,598,995 | $ | 35,474 | $ | 2.43 | ||||||||||||||||
Investors in this offering | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
The calculations on this page are based on shares outstanding as of December 31, 1999. These calculations exclude from the number of outstanding shares of common stock:
| 1,647,669 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options as of December 31, 1999 at a weighted average exercise price of $0.69 per share; | |
| 390,286 additional shares of common stock authorized for granting as stock options by the board of directors as of December 31, 1999; | |
| 312,952 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants for series C redeemable convertible preferred stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.11 per share and conversion of shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to an equal number of shares of common stock; | |
| 1,704,311 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants for series D redeemable convertible preferred stock at a weighted average exercise |
25
price of $4.50 per share and conversion of shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock to an equal number of shares of common stock; | ||
| 222,303 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of warrants for common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $4.50 per share; and | |
| shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. |
If all of the options and warrants outstanding as of December 31, 1999 had been exercised at that date, dilution to new investors in this offering would be $ per share.
26
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents the selected historical consolidated financial data of our business. The consolidated financial data for 1995 have been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial data for 1996 have been derived from, and are qualified by reference to, our audited financial statements. The financial data for 1997, 1998 and 1999 have been derived from, and are qualified by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
On July 1, 1999, we acquired Radian Systems. We accounted for this acquisition using the purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations of Radian Systems are included in our consolidated financial data for the period from July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
You should read Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and the audited financial statements and related notes of Radian Systems included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses | $ | 220 | $ | 139 | $ | 422 | $ | 575 | $ | 4,332 | ||||||||||||
Services and maintenance | 486 | 1,010 | 2,816 | 2,423 | 3,347 | |||||||||||||||||
Hardware | 169 | 638 | 438 | 1,013 | 719 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 875 | 1,787 | 3,676 | 4,011 | 8,398 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 34 | 15 | 172 | 173 | 2,409 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of services and maintenance | 371 | 634 | 1,332 | 1,881 | 2,749 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 135 | 442 | 321 | 762 | 922 | |||||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 540 | 1,091 | 1,825 | 2,816 | 6,080 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 335 | 696 | 1,851 | 1,195 | 2,318 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 123 | 323 | 545 | 991 | 3,635 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 27 | 159 | 1,187 | 2,257 | 6,827 | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 117 | 334 | 642 | 806 | 3,506 | |||||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense | | | 5 | 19 | 651 | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 267 | 816 | 2,379 | 4,073 | 14,619 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | 68 | (120 | ) | (528 | ) | (2,878 | ) | (12,301 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (10 | ) | (28 | ) | (39 | ) | (84 | ) | (508 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income, net | | 6 | 19 | 5 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||
Total other income, net | (10 | ) | (22 | ) | (20 | ) | (79 | ) | (491 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 58 | (142 | ) | (548 | ) | (2,957 | ) | (12,792 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock | | (123 | ) | (191 | ) | (3,570 | ) | (8,514 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | $ | 58 | $ | (265 | ) | $ | (739 | ) | $ | (6,527 | ) | $ | (21,306 | ) | ||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders (1) | | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (2.57 | ) | $ | (6.54 | ) | |||||||||
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders(1) | | 2,537 | 2,537 | 2,539 | 3,260 | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | Prior to February 1996, we operated as a limited liability company and therefore we have not presented share and per share data for the year ended December 31, 1995. |
27
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 18 | $ | 1,844 | $ | 343 | $ | 1,873 | $ | 10,903 | ||||||||||
Working capital (deficit) | (9 | ) | 1,665 | 632 | 3,808 | 10,654 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | 213 | 2,318 | 2,544 | 5,689 | 22,283 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding current portion | 166 | 192 | 153 | 77 | 474 | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock | | 2,000 | 2,191 | 12,161 | 43,479 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit) | | (297 | ) | (1,037 | ) | (7,561 | ) | (26,539 | ) | |||||||||||
Members capital (deficit) | (102 | ) | | | | |
We have not presented our redeemable convertible preferred stock as part of our stockholders equity because it is mandatorily redeemable after November 2004. All of these shares will automatically convert into common stock upon consummation of this offering.
28
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of Radian Systems and related notes contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Certain information contained in the discussion and analysis set forth below and elsewhere in this prospectus, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. In evaluating such statements, prospective investors should specifically consider the various factors identified in this prospectus that could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements including matters set forth in Risk Factors.
Overview
We are a leading provider of XML-based Internet infrastructure software for creating interactive e-business portals. Interactive portals are a new generation of e-business solutions that are designed to tap into todays vast corporate and Internet information reservoirs in order to bring the right information to the right people at the right time. This new type of XML-based information portal is distinctively capable of intelligently aggregating data and content from disparate sources, personalizing that information based upon a users profile, and enabling the user to interact with the original information source. These capabilities meet a growing need for software products that can sift through the increasing volumes of corporate and Internet-based information to identify and facilitate new e-business opportunities. From corporate intranets and extranets to Internet-based content and commerce providers, our products address a growing demand for a new breed of dynamic, flexible and standards-based e-business software that brings information and people together.
Sequoia Software was founded in March 1992. During the period from our inception to 1996, we generated revenues primarily from developing custom software products that provided information management functionality to our customers. Beginning in early 1996, we saw potential for a new generation of software, based on Internet standards and designed to bring the right information to the right people at the right time. By early 1998, we had transitioned our business model from custom information technology products and services to pre-packaged, XML-based software licensing, professional services and maintenance. This transition is reflected in our financial results and should be considered when performing historical comparisons. We commercially released our first XML-based software product in November 1998, and we released XPS in March 1999. We released a subsequent version of XPS in December 1999. We have grown from 56 employees as of December 31, 1998 to 152 employees as of December 31, 1999.
On July 1, 1999, we acquired Radian Systems for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.0 million in cash and stock. We accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting. As such, the results of operations of Radian Systems have been included in our results of operations beginning July 1, 1999, and the acquired net assets were recorded at their estimated fair value on July 1, 1999. We recorded approximately
29
We derive our revenues from software licenses, maintenance and services. In addition, we have previously sold hardware purchased from third parties for the convenience of our customers. Licenses for our software typically contain multiple elements, including the product license, maintenance and other services. We allocate the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on the relative fair value of each of the deliverables determined based on specific objective evidence.
License revenues include fees from the sale of our XPS software as well as third party software. Certain software that we have developed is licensed under contractual arrangements that, in addition to the delivery of software, require significant modification and customization of the software. These arrangements are accounted for using the percentage of completion method, with progress to completion measured based on labor costs incurred.
Sales of our software and third-party software are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, and the fee is fixed or determinable and probable of collection. Software license fees billed and not recognized as revenue are included in deferred revenue.
Our services include installation, basic consulting, as well as software customization and modification to meet specific customer needs. Service fees that are provided under long-term contracts to install and customize our software or third-party software are recognized using the percentage of completion method. Progress to completion is measured using costs incurred compared to estimated total costs, or contract milestones.
Our maintenance includes telephone support, bug fixes, and rights to upgrades on a when and if available basis associated with software licenses. These fees are collected in advance and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Unrecognized maintenance fees are included in deferred revenues.
We sell hardware purchased from third parties as a convenience to our customers. These revenues are recognized when the hardware is shipped. We expect that the sale of hardware will not continue to be a material part of our operations as we transition our business model from custom information technology products and services to pre-packaged software licensing, services and maintenance.
Our cost of license revenues includes expenses pertaining to manufacturing, packaging and distributing our products and related documentation. In the year ended December 31, 1999, as a result of our acquisition of Radian Systems, our cost of license revenues also included the cost of purchased third-party licenses sold to our customers. Cost of license revenues also includes the amortization of capitalized software development costs. Our cost of services and maintenance includes salaries and related expenses for our expert product services organization, costs of third-party consultants, and an allocation for overhead and recruitment.
Research and development expenses consist of new software development and the costs associated with our in-house development staff. The costs associated with this in-house
30
Sales and marketing expenses consist of salaries and related costs, as well as direct marketing costs, including trade shows, public relations, advertising, marketing materials and market research. We currently license our products primarily through our direct sales force. Additionally, we focus on working with our indirect channel partners, as well as identifying new indirect channel partners. These costs are expensed as incurred.
General and administrative expenses include our personnel and other costs associated with management, finance, human resources and information services activities. We intend to hire a significant number of employees in the future. This expansion places significant demands on our management and operational resources. To manage our rapid growth and increased demand, we must invest in and implement scalable operating systems, procedures and controls. We expect future expansion to continue to challenge our ability to hire, train, manage and retain qualified employees. These costs are expensed as incurred.
Since our inception, we have incurred substantial costs to develop our technology and products, to recruit and train personnel for our research and development, sales and marketing and professional services departments and to establish an administrative infrastructure. As a result, as of December 31, 1999, we had an accumulated deficit of $26.6 million after accretion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock. We believe our success depends on rapidly increasing our customer base, further developing XPS and introducing new product enhancements into the marketplace. We intend to continue to invest heavily in research and development and sales and marketing. We therefore expect to continue to incur substantial operating losses for the foreseeable future.
31
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth consolidated statement of operations data for each of the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenues:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||
Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Licenses | 11.5 | % | 14.3 | % | 51.6 | % | ||||||||
Services and maintenance | 76.6 | 60.4 | 39.8 | |||||||||||
Hardware | 11.9 | 25.3 | 8.6 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 4.7 | 4.3 | 28.7 | |||||||||||
Cost of services and maintenance | 36.2 | 46.9 | 32.7 | |||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 8.7 | 19.0 | 11.0 | |||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 49.6 | 70.2 | 72.4 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 50.4 | 29.8 | 27.6 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Research and development | 14.8 | 24.7 | 43.3 | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 32.3 | 56.2 | 81.3 | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 17.4 | 20.1 | 41.8 | |||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 0.2 | 0.5 | 7.7 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 64.7 | 101.5 | 174.1 | |||||||||||
Loss from operations | (14.3 | ) | (71.7 | ) | (146.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (1.1 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (6.0 | ) | ||||||||
Other income, net | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Total other income, net | (0.6 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (5.8 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss | (14.9 | )% | (73.7 | )% | (152.3 | )% | ||||||||
Years Ended December 31, 1999 and 1998
Revenues. Total revenues increased 109.3% to $8.4 million in 1999 from $4.0 million in 1998. The increase in revenues was due primarily to an increase in the number of new customers to 43 customers in 1999 from 13 customers in 1998, accounting for $7.1 million or 84.5% of total revenues in 1999.
License revenues increased 653.4% to $4.3 million in 1999 from $575,000 in 1998. The increase in license revenues was due to the first full year of commercial availability of XPS. License revenues for XPS increased to $1.5 million in 1999 from $200,000 in 1998. The remaining increase in license revenues was due to the addition of the existing customer base of Radian Systems which we acquired on July 1, 1999.
32
Services and maintenance revenues increased 38.1% to $3.3 million in 1999 from $2.4 million in 1998. The increase in services and maintenance revenues was attributable primarily to an increase in services and support provided in connection with increasing license sales and the growth of our customer base.
Hardware revenues decreased 29.0% to $719,000 in 1999, from $1.0 million in 1998. Historically, hardware was provided at the request of customers in conjunction with long-term contracts to customize software. We do not expect hardware to be a material component of our business model.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of license revenues increased 1,290.5% to $2.4 million in 1999 from $173,000 in 1998 due to increased license revenues. Our cost of license revenues increased at a faster rate than our license revenues due to the product mix resulting from our acquisition of Radian Systems.
The cost of services and maintenance revenues increased 46.1% to $2.7 million in 1999 from $1.9 million in 1998. The increase was due primarily to providing these services in conjunction with increasing license sales.
The cost of hardware revenues increased 21.0% to $922,000 in 1999 from $762,000 in 1998. In 1999, we incurred a loss on the sale of hardware in conjunction with a long-term contract.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 94.0% to $2.3 million in 1999 from $1.2 million in 1998. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit decreased to 27.6% in 1999 from 29.8% in 1998, primarily due to a change in our license revenue mix stemming from our acquisition of Radian Systems.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased 266.8% to $3.6 million in 1999 from $991,000 in 1998. The increase was attributable primarily to the addition of 31 personnel in our research and development department.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 202.5% to $6.8 million in 1999 from $2.3 million in 1998. The increase was primarily attributable to hiring 52 sales and marketing and customer support employees, as well as costs associated with the sales and marketing of our products.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 335.1% to $3.5 million in 1999 from $806,000 in 1998. The increase was due primarily to hiring 7 administrative personnel. In addition, we recognized a $621,000 inventory impairment as a result of obsolescence in 1999. We also recognized $200,000 of compensation expense related to the issuance of stock options in 1999 and $636,000 of amortization expense related to intangible assets recorded in connection with our acquisition of Radian Systems.
Bad Debt Expense. Bad debt expense increased 3,345.0% to $651,000 in 1999 from $19,000 in 1998. The increase in bad debt expense resulted principally from bad debt expense we recognized in connection with a long-term subcontract arrangement to provide software customization and related services. We recorded $434,000 of bad debt expense
33
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased 519.2% to $491,000 in 1999 from $79,000 in 1998. The increase in net interest expense was due primarily to increases in borrowings to finance our operations and to acquire Radian Systems.
Years Ended December 31, 1998 and 1997
Revenues. Total revenues increased 9.1% to $4.0 million in 1998 from $3.7 million in 1997.
License revenues increased 36.2% to $575,000 in 1998 from $422,000 in 1997. This increase was due primarily to the first installations of our initial XML-based product, which we commercially released in November 1998.
Services and maintenance revenues decreased 14.0% to $2.4 million in 1998 from $2.8 million in 1997. This decrease was primarily attributable to a shift in our efforts from custom software development to licensing pre-packaged software. This decrease was partially offset by the receipt of $1.1 million in 1998 and $215,000 in 1997 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, for development of an XML-based technology for aggregating health care data from disparate sources.
Hardware revenues increased 131.5% to $1.0 million in 1998 from $438,000 in 1997. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase of one component of a contract with a significant customer.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of license revenues remained unchanged in terms of dollars, but decreased as a percentage of total license revenues to 30.1% in 1998 from 40.8% in 1997. This decrease was due to a shift in our efforts from custom software development to licensing pre-packaged software.
Cost of services and maintenance revenues increased 41.3% to $1.9 million in 1998 from $1.3 million in 1997. The increase in dollars and percentage of revenue is the result of a cost sharing contract with National Institute of Standards and Technology, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Cost of hardware revenues increased 137.7% to $762,000 in 1998 from $321,000 in 1997, but remained constant as a percentage of hardware revenue. This increase was
34
Gross Profit. Total gross profit decreased 35.5% to $1.2 million in 1998 from $1.9 million in 1997. The decrease was attributable primarily to the increase in the cost of services and maintenance revenues resulting from the contract with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased 81.8% to $991,000 in 1998 from $545,000 in 1997. The increase was attributable primarily to the addition of 6 personnel in our research and development department.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 90.1% to $2.3 million in 1998 from $1.2 million in 1997. The increase was attributable primarily to hiring 7 sales and marketing and customer support employees, as well as costs associated with the sales and marketing of our products.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased 25.6% to $806,000 in 1998 and from $642,000 in 1997. The increase was due primarily to hiring 5 administrative personnel.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased 265.3% to $79,000 in 1998 from $20,000 in 1997. The increase in net interest expense was due primarily to the issuance of convertible promissory notes and long-term debt to finance our operations.
Selected Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly results of operations for each of the four quarters in the year ended December 31, 1999, as well as the percentage of our total revenues represented by each item indicated. We derived this data from our unaudited financial statements, and, in our opinion, they include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial results for the periods. Results of operations for any previous fiscal quarter do not necessarily indicate what results may be for any future period.
35
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | June 30, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
1999 | 1999 | 1999 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations: | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Licenses | $ | 304 | $ | 650 | $ | 1,496 | $ | 1,882 | ||||||||||
Services and maintenance | 609 | 394 | 1,308 | 1,036 | ||||||||||||||
Hardware | 137 | 1 | 115 | 466 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 1,050 | 1,045 | 2,919 | 3,384 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 33 | 51 | 753 | 1,572 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of services and maintenance | 393 | 361 | 1,085 | 910 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 132 | 0 | 373 | 417 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 558 | 412 | 2,211 | 2,899 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 492 | 633 | 708 | 485 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 484 | 546 | 987 | 1,618 | ||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 918 | 1,238 | 2,052 | 2,619 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 265 | 311 | 1,064 | 1,866 | ||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 0 | 30 | 2 | 619 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,667 | 2,125 | 4,105 | 6,722 | ||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (1,175 | ) | (1,492 | ) | (3,397 | ) | (6,237 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (8 | ) | (45 | ) | (239 | ) | (216 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income, net | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income, net | (2 | ) | (42 | ) | (235 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,177 | ) | $ | (1,534 | ) | $ | (3,632 | ) | $ | (6,449 | ) | ||||||
As a Percentage of Total Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Licenses | 29.0 | % | 62.2 | % | 51.3 | % | 55.6 | % | ||||||||||
Services and maintenance | 58.0 | 37.7 | 44.8 | 30.6 | ||||||||||||||
Hardware | 13.0 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 13.8 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 3.1 | 4.9 | 25.8 | 46.5 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of services and maintenance | 37.4 | 34.5 | 37.1 | 26.9 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 12.6 | 0.0 | 12.8 | 12.3 | ||||||||||||||
Total cost of revenues | 53.1 | 39.4 | 75.7 | 85.7 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 46.9 | 60.6 | 24.3 | 14.3 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 46.2 | 52.1 | 33.7 | 47.8 | ||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 87.4 | 118.5 | 70.3 | 77.4 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 25.2 | 29.8 | 36.5 | 55.1 | ||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.1 | 18.3 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 158.8 | 203.3 | 140.6 | 198.6 | ||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (111.9 | ) | (142.7 | ) | (116.3 | ) | (184.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (0.8 | ) | (4.3 | ) | (8.2 | ) | (6.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income, net | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Total other income, net | (0.2 | ) | (4.0 | ) | (8.1 | ) | (6.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss | (112.1 | %) | (146.7 | %) | (124.4 | %) | (190.6 | %) | ||||||||||
36
Revenues. Revenues generally remained constant in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and increased in each of the quarters ended September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999. The increase in total revenues to $2.9 million in the quarter ended September 30, 1999 from $1.0 million in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 was due primarily to the acquisition of Radian Systems. The increase in total revenues to $3.4 million in the quarter ended December 31, 1999 was due to the commercial introduction of XPS 2.0 and the increase in size of our customer base.
License revenues increased in each of the quarters ended March 31, 1999, June 30, 1999, September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999. The increase in license revenues to $650,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $304,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999 was due primarily to the commercial introduction of XPS. The increase in license revenues to $1.5 million and $1.9 million in the quarters ended September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999, respectively, was due primarily to the acquisition of Radian Systems and the commercial availability of XPS.
Services and maintenance revenues decreased to $394,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $609,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999. This decrease was due to our shift from custom software development to licensing pre-packaged software. Services and maintenance revenues increased to $1.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 1999 due to the acquisition of Radian Systems. These revenues decreased in the quarter ended December 31, 1999 due to the continuing shift toward licensing pre-packaged software.
Hardware revenues decreased to an insignificant amount in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $137,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999. Hardware revenues in the first quarter was due primarily to a long-term contract and was provided at the request of the customer. The increase in hardware revenues to $115,000 and $466,000 in the quarters ended September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999, respectively, was due primarily to the acquisition of Radian Systems.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of license revenues increased in each of the quarters ended March 31, 1999, June 30, 1999, September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999. The increase in the cost of license revenues to $51,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $33,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999 was due primarily to the commercial introduction of XPS. The increase in the cost of license revenues to $753,000 and $1.6 million in the quarters ended September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999, respectively, was due primarily to the increase in license revenues.
37
Cost of services and maintenance revenues generally remained constant at $393,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and $361,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 and increased to $1.1 million and $910,000 in the quarters ended September 30, 1999 and December 31, 1999, respectively. The increase in the third quarter was due to providing these services in conjunction with increasing license sales. The decrease of these costs in the fourth quarter was due to the shift towards pre-packaged software licenses with less services.
Cost of hardware revenues decreased to an insignificant amount in the quarter ended June 30, 1999 from $132,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 1999. Hardware costs in the quarter ended March 31, 1999 were 96.3% of hardware revenues and were incurred at the request of a customer as a component of a long-term contract. The cost of hardware revenues in the quarter ended September 30, 1999 of $373,000 exceeded hardware revenues due to a loss incurred on delivery of hardware in connection with this long-term contract. Cost of hardware revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 1999 of $417,000 were due primarily to existing contracts from our acquisition of Radian Systems.
Our operating expenses have increased in absolute dollars in each quarter in connection with investment in the growth of our business and operating structure. Research and development expenses increased as a result of increased personnel costs and associated overhead, as well as the use of contract labor to develop our software products. Sales and marketing expenses increased as a result of increased hiring of sales and marketing and customer support employees, as well as costs associated with the sales and marketing of our products. General and administrative expenses increased as a result of increased spending for administrative infrastructure as well as the amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of Radian Systems. In addition, in the quarter ended December 31, 1999, we recognized a $621,000 impairment of inventory as a result of obsolescence, as well as a $140,000 compensation charge related to vested stock options. Bad debt expense increased to $619,000 in the quarter ended December 31, 1999 from insignificant amounts in the prior three quarters. The increase in bad debt expense resulted principally from bad debt expense we recognized in connection with a long-term subcontract arrangement to provide software customization and related services. We recorded $434,000 of bad debt expense under this subcontract because we believe it is probable that a portion of the fees that we recognized as revenue will not be collected because of a dispute between the general contractor and its customer. Although we are not a party to the dispute, we believe that the likely resolution of the dispute will require us to make certain concessions for elements of the contract deliverables that are not currently operational. We are still owed another $974,000 under this arrangement, and all amounts owed are delinquent because the general contractor has been unable to collect certain fees billed. We believe that we will collect the amount owed in 2000, however, due to uncertainties surrounding the resolution of the dispute, it is reasonably possible that our estimate of the recoverability of this receivable may change in the near term.
Historically, our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may vary significantly in the future depending on many factors including, among others:
| the size, timing and recognition of revenue from significant orders; | |
| changes in the rapidly evolving market for internet infrastructure software solutions; |
38
| overall demand for and market acceptance of our products, services and future product enhancements; | |
| increases in operating expenses required for product development and marketing; | |
| our success in attracting highly skilled employees, whether related to technology, sales, marketing or management; | |
| the mix of services provided and whether services are provided by our own staff or third-party contractors; and | |
| cost related to possible acquisitions of technology or businesses. |
Overall, we believe that the purchase of our products is discretionary and generally involves a significant commitment of capital. As a result, purchases of our product may be deferred or cancelled in the event of a downturn of our customers businesses or the economy in general. As such, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Potential investors should not rely on the results of any one quarter as an indication of future performance.
Future Assessment of Recoverability and Impairment of Intangible Assets
In connection with our acquisition of Radian Systems, we recorded goodwill and covenants not to compete that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. At December 31, 1999, the unamortized portion of these intangibles was $4.8 million, which represented 21.4% of total assets and 28.2% of pro forma stockholders equity. We valued our acquired covenants not to compete based on an independent appraisal. We are amortizing the two contracts over a three- and four-year term. Goodwill represents the amount that we paid for Radian Systems in excess of the fair value of the acquired tangible and separately measurable intangible net assets. We have estimated the useful life of our goodwill to be five years based upon several factors, the most significant of which is the susceptibility of the business of Radian Systems to change as a result of technological advances and the rapidly changing needs of its customers.
We periodically review the carrying value and recoverability of our unamortized goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment. If the facts and circumstances suggest that the goodwill or other intangible assets may be impaired, the carrying value of this goodwill or these intangible assets will be adjusted by an immediate charge against income during the period of the adjustment. The length of the remaining amortization period may also be shortened, which will result in an increase in the amount of goodwill or intangible assets amortization during the period of adjustment and each period thereafter until fully amortized. Once adjusted, there can be no assurance that there will not be further adjustments for impairment and recoverability in future periods. Of the various factors to be considered by us in determining the existence of an impairment, the most significant will be: (i) losses from Radian Systems operations; (ii) loss of customers; and (iii) development of competitive products or services.
39
Income Taxes
We have incurred operating losses for all periods from September 30, 1996, and therefore have not recorded income tax expense for those periods. We have recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of our net deferred tax assets. We cannot currently predict the realization of the deferred tax assets.
As of December 31, 1999, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $15.6 million. These net operating loss carryforwards are available to reduce future taxable income and begin to expire in 2011. Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, certain substantial changes in our ownership may limit the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that could be used in each year to offset future taxable income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have primarily financed our operations and capital expenditures through the private sales of redeemable convertible preferred stock, with net proceeds of approximately $31.8 million, as well as through bank loans and equipment leases. We have also financed our operations and capital expenditures through a line of credit and a equipment financing arrangement, under which an aggregate of $1.7 million was outstanding as of December 31, 1999. We had $10.9 million of cash and cash equivalents and $10.7 million in working capital as of December 31, 1999.
Our net cash used in operating activities was $1.2 million in 1997, $4.1 million in 1998 and $11.1 million in 1999. The increase in cash used in operating activities was due primarily to our net loss excluding non-cash charges (consisting principally of depreciation and amortization) and our working capital investments. Our working capital investments consist principally of accounts receivable and unbilled revenue. Our accounts receivable and unbilled revenue at the end of any period have significantly fluctuated due principally to the significant dollar amount of our individual software licensing arrangements and other software services and the timing of the revenue recognition of these arrangements.
At December 31, 1999, 23.5% of our accounts receivable, or $974,000, was due from one customer acting as a general contractor to which we were engaged under a subcontractor arrangement, which required delivery and significant modification and customization of software. We expect to collect most of the balance of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 1999 in the first quarter of 2000.
Net cash used in investing activities was $553,000 in 1997, $395,000 in 1998 and $645,000 in 1999. We expended $425,000 in 1997 and $100,000 in 1998 for capitalized software development costs principally related to the development of XPS. Capital expenditures were $197,000 in 1997, $295,000 in 1998, and $848,000 in 1999. Our capital expenditures consisted of purchases of operating resources to manage our operations, including computer hardware and software, office furniture and equipment and leasehold improvements. We expect that our capital expenditures will continue to increase in the future.
On July 1, 1999, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Radian Systems for 1.4 million shares of our common stock, valued in an independent appraisal at
40
Our net cash provided by financing activities was $251,000 in 1997, $6.0 million in 1998 and $20.7 million in 1999. In 1998 and 1999, we issued series B and series C redeemable convertible preferred stock that provided us total cash proceeds of $29.6 million. Upon completion of this offering, our outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock will automatically convert into common stock.
We expect to experience significant growth in our operating expenses, particularly research and development and sales and marketing expenses, for the foreseeable future in order to execute our business plan. As a result, we anticipate that such operating expenses, as well as planned capital expenditures, will constitute a material use of our cash resources. In addition, we may utilize cash resources to fund acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. We believe that our net proceeds from this offering, together with cash and cash equivalents on hand, will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, including working capital requirements and planned capital expenditures. We may require additional funds for other purposes, and there can be no assurance that additional financing sources will be available or that, if available, the financing will be attainable on terms favorable to us.
In March 1999, we entered into a loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, whereby Silicon Valley Bank will provide draws to us under a revolving line of credit arrangement in an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.0 million and an equipment line of credit arrangement in aggregate principal amount of $750,000. The revolving line of credit is to be used for working capital purposes and the equipment line of credit is to be used only to finance or refinance the purchase of equipment. To secure these loans, we have granted Silicon Valley Bank a security interest in all of our assets. The revolving line of credit matures on March 25, 2000 and the equipment line of credit matures on February 5, 2003. Interest on the revolving line of credit is payable monthly and accrues at the prime rate as announced by Silicon Valley Bank plus 0.75% per annum. Interest on the equipment line of credit is due monthly in arrears and accrues at the prime rate as announced by Silicon Valley Bank plus 1.25% per annum. As of December 31, 1999, we had $1.0 million outstanding under the revolving line of credit and $650,000 outstanding under the equipment line of credit. In connection with these lines of credit, we issued to Silicon Valley Bank promissory notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to $1.0 million and $750,000, respectively.
In addition, in May 1997, we entered into a loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, whereby Silicon Valley Bank will provide funds to us under an equipment line of credit in an aggregate principal amount of up to $500,000. This equipment line of credit is to be used only to finance or refinance purchases of equipment. To secure this loan, we have granted Silicon Valley Bank a security interest in all of our assets. This equipment line of credit matures on November 14, 2000. Interest is due monthly in arrears and accrues at the prime rate as announced by Silicon Valley Bank plus 1.50% per annum. As of December 31, 1999, we had $65,000 outstanding under this equipment line of credit. In connection with this line
41
Our ability to declare and pay dividends is substantially restricted under our loan agreements with Silicon Valley Bank.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 98-9, or SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. SOP 98-9 requires recognition of revenue using the residual method for multiple element software arrangements when three conditions have all been satisfied. We are required to adopt SOP 98-9 in 2000. We do not expect such adoption to have any effect on our results of operations.
Impact of the Year 2000 Issue
We did not experience any problems on January 1, 2000 and to date, we have not experienced, nor are we aware of, any material Year 2000 issues with any of our internal systems or our services, and we do not anticipate experiencing such issues in the future. Further, we are unaware of any issues with our vendors, suppliers or customers that will materially affect us.
Our total cost to proactively address our Year 2000 issues was approximately $30,000. The cost of addressing Year 2000 issues was reported as a general and administrative expense. We believe we have identified and resolved all Year 2000 issues that could materially and adversely affect our business operations.
We have developed contingency plans to be implemented if our efforts to identify and correct Year 2000 issues affecting our internal systems were ineffective. We have adopted the Year 2000 contingency plans as our standard operational contingency plans. Our contingency plans are designed to minimize disruptions or other adverse effects. Our plans include:
| accelerated replacement of affected equipment or software; | |
| short to medium-term use of backup equipment and software; | |
| increased work hours for our personnel; and | |
| use of contract personnel to correct on an accelerated schedule any Year 2000 issues that arise or to provide manual workarounds for information systems. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates that could affect our future results of operations and financial condition. We manage our exposure to these risks through our regular operating and financing activities.
42
The fair value of our cash and cash equivalents would not be significantly impacted by either a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates due to the short-term nature of our portfolio. At December 31, 1999, our investment in interest-bearing securities is not material.
Our revolving credit facility and equipment term loan bear interest at variable rates, and the fair values of these instruments are not significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates for one year would increase interest expense by an immaterial amount.
43
BUSINESS
Overview
Sequoia Software Corporation is a leading provider of XML-based Internet infrastructure software for creating interactive e-business portals. Interactive portals are a new generation of e-business solutions that are designed to tap into todays vast corporate and Internet information reservoirs in order to bring the right information to the right person at the right time. This new type of XML-based information portal is capable of intelligently aggregating data and content from disparate sources, personalizing that information based upon a users profile, and enabling the user to interact with the original information source. These capabilities meet a growing need for software products that can sift through the increasing volumes of corporate and Internet-based information to identify and facilitate new e-business opportunities. From corporate intranets and extranets to Internet-based content and commerce providers, our products address a growing demand for a new breed of dynamic, flexible and standards-based e-business software that brings information and people together.
Our XML-based products are designed to meet todays e-business challenge. Our flagship product is the Sequoia XML Portal Server, or XPS. XPS is a comprehensive software solution targeted at enterprises that are deploying interactive portals to improve e-business processes and create new opportunities. We believe that XPS is the first interactive portal software product that is intrinsically based on XML. By using XML, XPS is distinctively capable of integrating, extracting and aggregating information from disparate applications such as customer databases, groupware products, business intelligence solutions, human resource systems and financial applications, as well as the Internet. Once XPS aggregates information, it uses our patent-pending XML indexing technology to provide users with content based searching capabilities so that they can access and interact with the most relevant information available, personalized for each users individualized needs. Our customers leverage XPS capabilities to create a variety of e-business solutions. For example, one of our customers uses XPS to keep its sales representatives better informed about their customers, prospects and products to enhance revenue opportunities. Another of our customers utilizes XPS to open its information resources to its partners and affiliates in order to broaden their market share. These examples illustrate how XPS readily adapts to the differing and changing needs of our customers so that their e-business strategies can be implemented rapidly, evolve and scale.
We believe that establishing an interactive portal is critical for many businesses, institutions and governments to compete in todays global business environment. Our solution provides enterprises with a fully integrated, pre-packaged software application targeted directly at this need.
Industry Overview
The Emergence of e-Business
The Internet has emerged as a powerful communications and commerce environment for enterprises to share and exchange business information with their employees, customers,
44
To succeed in this new environment, enterprises are adopting new Internet-based technologies to re-create themselves as e-businesses. e-Business results from the transformation of an enterprises internal and external business processes to take advantage of the communication infrastructure that the Internet provides for accessing new markets, providing additional services and enhancing customer relationships. This e-business imperative is driving companies to augment or even replace their traditional distribution, supply chain and customer-service channels with Internet-based channels in order to build new revenue streams, create competitive advantages and reduce costs.
The Challenge of e-Business: Integrating and Utilizing Information
Transforming into an e-business is a complex challenge. It requires enterprises to Internet-enable legacy systems, deploy new Internet-based infrastructure technologies, and manage the growing volume of information flowing into and out of the enterprise. IDC estimates that the number of web pages worldwide will grow from approximately 907 million in 1998 to over 13 billion in 2003, representing a compound annual growth rate of 70.3%. IDC also estimates that the amount of data in multi-user disk storage is expected to increase from more than 188,000 terabytes in 1999 to more than 1.9 million terabytes in 2003, representing a compound annual growth rate of 78.3%. All of this information arrives at the enterprise from multiple sources such as the Internet, corporate networks, e-mail, databases and business software programs. Additionally, this information is often in a format that is incompatible with an enterprises own systems.
Enterprises are devoting substantial resources to successfully integrate and utilize this increasing flow of information. IDC estimates that worldwide spending on Internet infrastructure software will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 31.0% from an estimated $9.4 billion in 1998 to $36.2 billion in 2003. We expect that this spending will be targeted at a variety of e-business strategies including e-commerce, knowledge management, supply chain management, customer support, self-service, procurement and online publishing. All of these strategies focus on establishing an e-business environment in which enterprises have the opportunity to make better business decisions and improve overall efficiency and productivity, and break down the geographic and logistical boundaries between offices, employees, customers, suppliers and strategic partners.
Inadequacy of Existing Solutions
Current means of aggregating and repurposing the increasing flow of information are costly and inadequate. Early attempts by enterprises to solve this problem through in-house software development efforts often failed due to the complexity of the challenge, insufficient internal resources and long development cycles. These difficulties led to the development of commercially available software products designed to address this information aggregation
45
Enterprises require a comprehensive and cost-effective solution that is capable of efficiently integrating and utilizing information from the wide variety of disparate information sources typically found in an enterprise. This type of solution should address the following problems:
| Limited Access to Information for Effective Business Intelligence and Decision-Making. Few available solutions have the capabilities to filter the vast amount of internal and external data and direct relevant information to those who need it. Enterprises require a solution that will enhance business intelligence and decision-making to identify new revenue opportunities and control costs. | |
| Inefficient Communication and Interaction with Constituencies. The Internet is fueling competition to bring products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner. Enterprises desire to increase productivity and reduce costs by improving interaction among their employees, customers, suppliers and strategic partners while automating manufacturing, distribution and procurement processes. | |
| Disparate Systems, Standards and Formats. The lack of a uniform standards-based approach for representing data makes it difficult for enterprises to integrate, aggregate, exchange and disseminate information. Enterprises need a universal language such as XML, which was formally recognized by the World Wide Web Consortium as an Internet standard in February 1998. | |
| Lengthy and Costly Implementation Cycles. Current solutions are time-consuming and costly to implement or have inadequate functionality. It is important for a solution to minimize the time and expense of system implementation. At the same time, the solution must include the technology to extract, store, analyze and act on information and solve specific business problems in areas such as sales, marketing, finance, customer support and Internet commerce. |
The complex problem of aggregating, organizing and interacting with the large volumes of information being generated by todays e-business environment requires a robust and focused solution such as an XML-based interactive portal.
The Sequoia Solution
We believe that interactive e-business portals are a critical component of a successful e-business strategy. Our solution consists of XML-based Internet infrastructure software and services that enable e-businesses to create, deploy and manage interactive portals. Our interactive e-business portal solution, XPS, aggregates and organizes information from disparate sources using a powerful, context-based approach to information management. With XPS, an enterprise can seamlessly integrate multiple sources of information into an easy to use, personalized interface. We believe this enhanced capability to access and interact with information improves an enterprises communication, decision-making, identification of new revenue opportunities and return on its technology investment.
46
We believe our comprehensive, integrated, interactive solution represents a fundamentally new approach to e-business solutions and provides our clients with the following benefits:
| Streamlined e-Business Processes. Our interactive e-business portal solutions enable and promote enterprise e-business strategies by enabling the integration and aggregation of disparate information. Our customers can create interactive environments in which their employees, customers, suppliers and strategic partners can share and update information in real-time. This improves coordination of effort and reduces the time it takes to respond to market changes and customer and strategic partner needs. | |
| Improved Decision-Making. Our products incorporate proprietary searching and indexing technology designed to provide the most up-to-date, user-defined information when and where it is needed. Good business decisions are generally a function of getting the right information to the right people at the right time. This often entails a lengthy process of sorting through large volumes of information. XPS can sweep multiple, disparate information sources, extract relevant data and personalize the presentation for specific users. With access to timely, relevant data, users can make more informed decisions. | |
| Enhanced Revenue Opportunities. Our solutions create new revenue opportunities for enterprises by facilitating business intelligence, customer communication and enterprise responsiveness. Companies are often isolated from vital information regarding current and potential customers and strategic partners. By leveraging the aggregation capabilities of our products, enterprises can determine which opportunities to target, based on predetermined, relevant criteria, and build better relationships. XPS presents this information in a useful format that assists users in identifying desirable opportunities. | |
| Maximized Return on Technology Investment. Our solutions are easily deployed through a set of configuration wizards. In addition, our technologies are designed to minimize the financial and opportunity costs of implementing e-business strategies. e-business solutions are often time-consuming and cumbersome to implement. They also frequently require enterprises to replace existing applications and systems. Our products do not require changes to underlying systems, which preserves an enterprises technology investments. By minimizing implementation costs, improving productivity and creating additional revenue opportunities, our solutions maximize an enterprises return on its technology investment. | |
| Flexible, Scalable, XML-based, Open Architecture. We have been using XML since 1997, before it was an adopted standard, because it is a powerful, enabling technology that is being widely adopted as the preferred Internet standard for e-business. XML enables users to attach descriptive tags that give meaning to the content. XML serves as the foundation for our open, highly scalable architecture that allows our customers to improve information management, preserve legacy system investments and enhance overall productivity. |
47
| Secure Information Sharing. Our security features operate in conjunction with our customers existing security services to identify and authenticate users. Security features are essential to enable enterprises to share confidential information rapidly over the Internet with a large number of geographically distributed employees, customers, suppliers and strategic partners. These features permit the enterprise to establish multiple levels of access rights based on each users organizational role and data content. |
The Sequoia Strategy
Our goal is to be the market leader for XML-based, Internet infrastructure software for creating e-business solutions. We intend to continue to supplement our solutions with comprehensive service and support, so that our customers may maximize the benefits achieved with the use of our software. The key elements of our business strategy are to:
| Maintain and Extend Leadership in XML-based Interactive e-Business Portal Software Market. We intend to continue to pursue open, standards-based, XML technology that can significantly reduce the complexity and effort required to create e-business solutions. We intend to continue to protect our XML-based technologies through patents, and leverage XML to develop new products for our customers. We are actively working with Internet-based standards organizations in the development of new XML-based e-business standards. | |
| Expand Product Offerings. We are actively developing new products and enhancements to foster our growth and solidify our leadership position. We also plan to expand our product offerings by marketing various components of XPS as stand-alone e-business infrastructure tools and applications, such as our XML indexing engine, Xdex. In addition, XPSs open architecture provides a flexible environment that allows third-parties to develop enhancements to XPS. We expect additional enhancements to include: |
| portal management capabilities that facilitate ease of deployment and maintenance; | |
| integration features that embrace open, emerging information exchange standards, such as Microsofts BizTalk and encourage third-party add-ons to our products; | |
| search and presentation features that improve the user experience; and | |
| an XML application server that will enhance our products scalability and transaction processing capabilities. |
| Further Develop Indirect Distribution Channels. We plan to continue to leverage our sales and marketing efforts through indirect distribution channels. We intend to continue to foster these relationships to fuel additional growth because they significantly extend our market reach. We focus on extending our sales, distribution and implementation capabilities by pursuing relationships with application service providers, system integrators, consultants, and independent software vendors and enhancing our customers user experience through partnerships with portal content providers and e-marketplaces. |
48
| Extend Our Strategic Relationships, Including Our Relationship with Microsoft. We intend to expand our relationships to pursue strategic opportunities for the marketing and sale of our products. These relationships provide us with an important endorsement of our software and a distribution mechanism for exposing the capabilities of our products. For example, we also intend to continue our collaborative efforts with Microsoft to further our expertise in Microsoft products and promote the advancement of XML-based technologies. | |
| Leverage Radian Systems Customer Base to Enhance Sales of XPS. We acquired Radian Systems substantial customer base, which includes prominent companies such as GE Power Generation and Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota. We intend to leverage this installed customer base to expand distribution and sale of XPS. This will enable Radian Systems customers to continue to use and build upon their information technology infrastructure investments. |
XML Standard
XPS is intrinsically based on eXtensible Markup Language, or XML, an emerging standard that defines a universal method for structuring data. XML was formally recommended by the World Wide Web Consortium as a standard in February 1998. Since then, a number of industry leaders, including Microsoft, IBM, Sun and Oracle have announced support for XML.
We believe that XML will be a key enabler of interactive portals and e-business solutions for enterprises. XML, like Hyper Text Markup Language, or HTML, descends from the Internets original data standard, Standard Generalized Markup Language, or SGML. Unlike HTML, the standard currently used for formatting information on the Internet, however, XML enables information to be coded for content rather than solely for presentation. This coding difference allows applications to examine and manipulate data for content as well as context. Descriptive tags are attached to each piece of data so applications can understand the meaning of the data and process it accordingly. This characteristic of XML eliminates the need for re-keying data and enables users to quickly identify, retrieve, parse, interpret and transmit critical business intelligence, including data, text, images and streaming audio/video.
Products
We believe we are the market leader for XML-powered interactive portal software. Our principal product, Sequoia XML Portal Server, or XPS, is a Microsoft Windows NT server-based, Internet infrastructure software product that enables the rapid deployment of interactive e-business portals. XPS is a fully integrated and pre-packaged application that contains both platform and application components. Our platform components provide the foundation for our standards-based, flexible and scalable architecture. Our application components provide the features and functionality of our e-business portal solutions.
XPS consists of a component-based architecture that improves access to information, allows users to act quickly upon that information and enhances user-to-user collaboration. XPS accomplishes this by providing an automated mechanism that periodically gathers and
49
The Interactive XML Portal Server
XPS 2.0
Our XPS 2.0 platform components run on Microsoft Windows NT. They extensively use XML as the universal method for describing and managing the disparate content that an organization exposes to its portal solution. XPS 2.0 contains three platform components: our XML Integration Engine, our XML Repository and our XML Rules Engine.
| XML Integration Engine. Our XML Integration Engine provides a BizTalk compliant mechanism for communicating with enterprise applications. This engine is responsible for extracting information from disparate applications and transferring the data to XPS. The engine is also responsible for providing XPS with its interactive capabilities by enabling the product to transmit new, updated information back to the original enterprise applications. | |
| XML Repository. Our XML Repository provides a mechanism for storing, indexing and providing controlled access to aggregated content. It receives content from two primary sources: our XML Integration Engine and end-user applications. Our XML Repository can maintain and manage both structured data, such as information extracted from databases, and unstructured data, such as word processing files, spreadsheets, web pages and multimedia files, including streaming audio and video. | |
| XML Rules Engine. Our XML Rules Engine analyzes XML data and performs functions based on its content. This engine is used by enterprises to integrate XPS with their existing business processes to create content-based rules for routing information to relevant parties, notifying users of information events, controlling access to data and personalizing content for the designated user. |
50
The following application components are available in XPS 2.0:
XPS 2.0 Application Components
Application Components | Description | |
Smart Summaries | Enables enterprises to create a single, comprehensive view of related information brought together from disparate sources. | |
XML Indexing | Leverages our patent-pending technology to enable users to do context-based searching. | |
Meta-Search | Allows users to search multiple internal and external content sources more rapidly with automatic updates. | |
Data Replication Services | Replicates database information to multiple servers. In conjunction with Meta-Search, this component provides enhanced scalability, or the ability to leverage an enterprises platform to manage growth. | |
Active Personalization | Enables users to subscribe to specific types of content and filter unwanted content from their personal desktop, and facilitates timely delivery of relevant information. | |
XML Data Entry | Facilitates the creation of XML documents via Internet-based forms. Content created using XML data entry may be stored in the XML Repository or returned to a host application. | |
Categorization | Organizes portal content through a rules-based methodology. |
XPS 3.0
In the near future, we intend to release our third generation of XPS. We are rapidly adding platform and application components to XPS to enhance the functionality we provide our customers and extend the products capabilities to meet the needs of the growing market for interactive e-business portals. In addition to the existing capabilities of XPS 2.0, we anticipate that our next generation product, XPS 3.0, will have the following platform components:
| XML Application Server. Our XML Application Server platform component enhances system scalability by allowing XPS platform and application components to be distributed onto multiple servers. This platform component of XPS 3.0 enhances transactional integrity by providing an XML-based messaging infrastructure built on the Microsoft NT platform. | |
| Content Delivery Server. Our Content Delivery Server platform component integrates information from third-party applications and personalizes it for specific end-users. Additionally, the Content Delivery Server enhances XPSs interactive capabilities by providing real-time, two-way integration with an enterprises legacy systems. |
51
In addition to these additional platform components and the existing functionality of XPS 2.0, XPS 3.0 will include the following set of application components:
XPS 3.0 Application Components
New Application Components | Description | |
Portal Management Console | Enables the creation, deployment and management of multiple e-business portals within a single enterprise. | |
Smart Spiders | Proactively gathers structured and unstructured data from internal and external sources, including network directories and file systems, enterprise applications, databases or external web sites. Smart spiders can be customized for the needs of a particular enterprise. | |
Collaboration | Provides public message boards and real-time chat facilities that allow portal users to enhance communications. |
e-Business Infrastructure Applications
Our architectural approach of developing separate platform and application components allows us to easily unbundle particular components for the marketing and sale of stand-alone e-business infrastructure products. Our first component to be unbundled from XPS is Xdex, our stand-alone XML indexing application. Xdex is currently a component of our integrated solution that we plan to re-package as a stand-alone product. Xdex will be used to index the growing volume of XML data now being generated since XMLs adoption by the World Wide Web Consortium. Xdex leverages our patent pending XML indexing technology to create a highly contextualized index for the search and retrieval of XML data. We released a technology preview of Xdex in December 1999 and expect to release it commercially in the near future. As of February 7, 2000, we have received over 600 specific inquiries and requests for Xdex, many from leading platform vendors and Global 2000 companies.
Other future components that we plan on unbundling from our existing solution include, but are not limited to, our Meta-Search component, XML Application Server and Smart Summaries. We believe Xdex, along with our other e-business infrastructure applications, creates new channels and opportunities for selling our e-business portal products. Furthermore, we believe these applications create additional opportunities for growth through possible sales through original equipment manufacturers.
Services
We offer our customers and indirect channel partners an array of training and expert product services in connection with the sale, distribution and use of our products. We believe these services are an important part of our success and the success of our customers. Our expert product services group is primarily focused on strengthening the implementation capabilities of our channel partners, which provide most of the services in conjunction with the sale of our products. Our product support group is expanding rapidly to support our growing customer base. We intend to leverage our services to broaden market awareness of
52
Expert Product Services
Technical Training. We regularly offer instructor-led, multimedia-driven courses that focus on the implementation, administration and management of our products. We also offer product education to our technical specialists through our series of product training courses, which are delivered at our corporate training center. We emphasize training because we believe that product education provides the knowledge transfer necessary to help expedite product implementation for our customers and business partners.
Reselling, Consulting and Implementation. We focus a significant amount of our efforts on our business partners that are authorized to resell our products and provide consulting and implementation services to both our customers and their own. We believe that this provides an ample resource to assist our customers in any consulting and implementation services they require in connection with the installation and deployment of our products. To ensure that those consulting and implementation services are provided properly, we assign product experts to each customer engagement, and require that our indirect channel partners be fully certified on our products.
Product Support
Ongoing product and customer support is important to our continued success and we strive to provide our customers with quick and helpful responses to inquiries. We provide a compilation of answers to frequently asked questions on our web site, which our customers can access in addition to calling customer support. Our product and customer support personnel answer product questions and provide troubleshooting advice. The customer support team is active in many areas of our business and participates in product training for new employees, reviewing and offering input for product documentation and assisting with the quality assurance effort for each software release.
Sales and Marketing
Our sales and marketing function is focused on delivering interactive e-business portal solutions that are directed at the specific needs of our customers. To accomplish this, we are focusing our marketing efforts on developing greater awareness of the benefits of XML-powered interactive e-business portals. Moreover, in addition to targeting the interactive e-business portal market, we are focusing on specific market segments that are aggressively seeking to adopt innovative technologies in order to acquire a competitive advantage. In the e-business portal market, these market segments include financial services, communications/ technology, industrial, healthcare and government.
For each of these markets, we intend to sell and market specialized portal initiatives, including:
| strategic business alliances with channel partners, independent software vendors and service companies that have established brand identity for each market segment; |
53
| connections to industry-specific application software; | |
| industry-specific interfaces; | |
| industry-specific product overviews, or white papers, and case studies; and | |
| sponsor exhibits and speak at industry trade shows. |
Sales
Direct Sales. As of February 7, 2000, our direct sales force consisted of 24 sales professionals and 14 technical sales support specialists primarily based at our principal offices, as well as sales offices in Chicago, Illinois; New York, New York; San Jose, California; St. Louis, Missouri and Dublin, Ireland. Our direct sales force focuses on end-users and channel partners to generate product demand. We intend to increase the number of sales professionals and technical sales support specialists located both domestically and internationally.
Indirect Channels. We intend to significantly expand our installed base and service capabilities through relationships with indirect channel partners. Our indirect channel partners consist of applications service providers, systems integrators and consultants that market, sell, implement and support our products and independent software vendors that can incorporate and embed our products into their own e-business solutions. Our indirect channel partners include Acuent, Cediti of Belgium, General Dynamics Defense Systems, ImageVision.Net, Impact Innovations Group, Microsoft, PSINet, RWD Technologies, S2 Systems and Superior Consultant.
Product Marketing
Our marketing organization consists of two functions, product marketing and corporate communications. Product marketing provides a strategic function within the organization focusing on product direction, branding, target markets and strategic positioning. Our corporate communications group seeks to increase market awareness, generate leads, promote our technology leadership and educate independent research analysts. These efforts include brand promotion, public relations, advertising, trade shows, speaking engagements, seminars, direct mail, telemarketing, web sites and white papers. Our marketing professionals also produce marketing materials to support sales to prospective customers, such as brochures, data sheets, presentations and demonstrations.
Business Alliances
To increase our leadership in the market, we have formed business alliances focused on enhancing relationships with complementary vendors that we believe will contribute to our success, such as portal content providers and e-marketplaces. Our business alliances offer a variety of products and services that when incorporated into our product offering provide additional capabilities. Our business relationship strategy is focused on enhancing user experience through partnerships with portal content providers and e-marketplaces.
54
Strategic Relationship with Microsoft
We continue to forge a close sales, marketing and technology relationship with Microsoft. This relationship enables us to capitalize on the growing market for e-business solutions by complementing and augmenting the products and services we provide to our customers, and extending our market reach.
We have been working with Microsofts Business Solutions Group since late 1997 to jointly create opportunities for XML-based interactive portals in vertical markets such as healthcare, financial and government. As a marketing partner, Microsoft sponsors XPS which is Microsoft BackOffice-certified and leverages Microsoft technology such as Microsoft SQL Server 7.0, Distributed Component Object Model, Microsoft Transaction Server, BizTalk and Internet Explorer 5.0. We are continuing to expand our sales, marketing and technology relationship with Microsoft. This relationship provides us with an important endorsement of our software, and a distribution mechanism for exposing the capabilities of our products to the Microsoft customer base. Our Microsoft relationship has included joint promotional efforts, marketing materials, white papers and product demonstrations. At a recent trade show, Microsofts founder, chairman and chief software architect, Bill Gates, demonstrated XPS to thousands of attendees and the media.
Research and Development
Our development staff is responsible for enhancing our existing products and expanding our product line. We believe that a technically skilled software development organization will continue to be a core component of our success. As of February 7, 2000, we had a development staff of 61 personnel, including 29 developers, 17 quality assurance personnel, seven product support personnel and eight product management personnel.
We have made substantial investments in research and development, primarily through internal development, but also through technology acquisitions. Our research and development expenditures for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 were approximately $500,000, $1.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Our research and development expenses have been expensed as incurred. We expect that we will continue to commit significant resources to research and development in the future, as it is a key component of our strategy. We focus our research and development activity on enhancing our existing software and developing new software products. We work closely with our customers and strategic partners to identify areas on which to focus our new product development efforts.
In 1997, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Advanced Technology Program, awarded us a contract to research and develop XML-based technology for aggregating health care data from disparate sources.
We believe that we have demonstrated significant innovations in our application of XML technologies to address the problems of e-business. While we evaluate externally-developed technologies for integration into our software, most enhancements to our software
55
Customers and Case Studies
Customers
Our customers represent a broad array of enterprises within diverse industry sectors, including financial services, communications/ technology, industrial, healthcare and government. Customers are generally organizations that seek to leverage emerging technology to achieve a competitive advantage in their markets. Since the commercial release of XPS in March 1999, the number of our licensed users has grown rapidly. Licensing deals range from departmental-size solutions to enterprise-wide commitments.
The following is a partial list of customers that have licensed our XPS software or software of our wholly owned subsidiary, Radian Systems:
Financial Services
Prudential Insurance* | |
First Trust* |
| Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota* |
Communications/ Technology
IT Publishing | |
Ecommunications | |
Fantasy Sports Network | |
PSINet | |
Stateside.com |
Industrial
GE Power Generation |
Healthcare
Baylor Health Care System | |
Centers for Disease Control | |
Kaiser Permanente | |
MacNeal Health Network |
Government
Arlington County, Virginia |
| National Institute of Standards and Technology |
The State of Texas* |
Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Minnesota and The State of Texas each represent more than 10% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 1999.
Customer Case Studies
We believe our customers have chosen XPS due to its scalable, open architecture, low cost of ownership and rapid implementation. Our customers use XPS to create interactive portals that facilitate collaboration within the enterprise, integrate disparate business processes and existing systems, enable better decision-making and optimize operations. Customers also use XPS to provide fast access to complex information over the Internet for collaboration with their customers, employees, suppliers and strategic partners.
56
GE Power Generation
General Electric is a Fortune 50 company that is a worldwide market leader in manufacturing and services. One of its manufacturing divisions, GE Power Generation, builds heavy-turbine and generator equipment to produce electricity for major utility companies worldwide. Each turbine and generator is composed of thousands of machine-critical parts designed to withstand extreme high temperature and strict operating tolerances. Due to their mission-critical nature, GE Power creates and maintains extensive electronic databases containing as-built configuration data and paper-based information pertaining to these parts for each turbine manufactured. This data is critical to the operation and maintenance of this equipment. However, managing such customer requests for complete and accurate sets of this information was an expensive, time-consuming and labor-intensive process. To address the challenge of managing this information, GE Power implemented a document management solution purchased from Radian Systems. With Radian Systems solution, GE Power was able to successfully streamline the paper-based process for aggregating turbine parts information.
Following our acquisition of Radian Systems, we introduced GE Power to XPS. Radian Systems extensive knowledge of the technology challenges facing Power Systems enabled us to effectively demonstrate the benefits that XPS could provide to our recently acquired client. GE Power quickly recognized that with XPS, it could provide its customers and employees with a more comprehensive solution that included better access to more data from a wider range of information sources.
Utilizing XPSs highly scalable and flexible architecture, GE Power customers are now empowered to easily and directly access the exact information they require from any Internet-enabled computer on a real-time basis. Our solution enables GE Power to aggregate its data from multiple disparate sources in real-time to provide customers and employees with immediate access to the current information. As a result, GE Power was able to reduce the number of employees required to manage its information retrieval and distribution process by 60% while enhancing the accessibility of the data and documents. Implementation of the solution provides GE Power the ability to connect the portal to additional data sources to further enhance GE Powers capability to provide additional e-business services to its customers.
PSINet
PSINet Inc. is one of the largest providers of Internet solutions and services for global business. The worlds first commercial Internet service provider, PSINet operates one of the largest and most advanced Internet access networks. PSINet provides Internet access in over 800 metropolitan areas in 26 countries. To manage this rapid growth, PSINet Limited, a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary, sought to effectively leverage its information resources to improve the productivity of its sales, marketing customer services teams.
Having already made a significant investment in its existing technology infrastructure, PSINet required a solution that was compatible with its existing systems yet could meet the heavy remote access demands of its cross-continent teams. Initially, PSINet began an
57
For PSINet, in mid-1999, it began evaluating the emerging class of enterprise portal products to determine which products had the necessary features and XML-based capabilities to address its portal requirements and potentially augment and replace its in-house development efforts. In October 1999, PSINet selected XPS and commenced a pilot project to evaluate whether our product could meet its needs. In just a few days, the initial pilot was successful, and discussions progressed regarding an XPS licensing arrangement that would adequately serve the diverse needs of its employee and customer base.
With XPS, PSINet is able to integrate with and aggregate information from existing systems and provide its sales and marketing team with information personalized to meet their individual needs. XPS enabled PSINet employees to more readily access sales tools such as customer documents, brochures and white papers and to interact with other corporate databases through any web browser. In addition, sales representatives can utilize our XML Data Entry component, to easily create web-based forms for real-time updating of customer contact information. Our product also provides PSINet sales representatives located in various worldwide offices access to client contact records and current product documentation. The next phase of PSINets project will offer integrated real-time scheduling, daily sales information and the ability to pull information stored in a variety of existing systems.
Baylor Health Care System
Baylor Health Care System is based in Dallas, Texas and is one of the nations largest not-for profit integrated health care providers, encompassing a network of hospitals, primary care centers and practices, community health centers and senior health centers. For six consecutive years, U.S. News & World Reports Americas Best Hospitals guide has ranked Baylor among the top hospitals nationwide in several specialties. An employer of more than 13,000 people, Baylor ranks as the fourth largest private sector employer in the Dallas/ Forth Worth Metroplex. In addition, Baylor provides cohesive and coordinated research efforts and pursues research opportunities through the Baylor Research Institute. Baylor University Medical Center, a major patient care, teaching and research center for the Southwest and the second largest medical center in the Metroplex, serves as Baylor Health Care Systems flagship hospital.
Baylor has a wide network of affiliated physicians and a geographically distributed infrastructure base. As part of this large network, Baylor manages a variety of disparate information systems where relevant patient information is frequently dispersed. For Baylor, the challenge was to make it quicker and more convenient for its health care providers to get the information they need to provide the best care for their patients. To do this, Baylor
58
Baylor is now engaged in an aggressive transformation to an e-business. To accomplish this, Baylor is implementing a variety of e-business initiatives, including an enterprise portal. Baylor selected XPS, as a component of its overall strategy, primarily because of its ability to serve as a clinical document data repository as well as for a variety of technical reasons, including XPSs adherence to open standards. Because Baylor adheres to health care standards, which are moving towards XML, XPS and its XML-based architecture, was a natural choice. In addition, with our XML Repository, Baylor will be able to replace existing and outdated systems, and at the same time provide enhanced functionality such as context-based searching capabilities on textual reports. XPS will also be utilized to aggregate dispersed patient information and to replace current methods of information delivery. Physicians using the Baylor enterprise portal will use XPS to get quick access to and interact with information such as admitting records, contact and insurance information, radiology reports, laboratory reports and other patient records. With this information, Baylor Health Care System can provide patient care in a more efficient manner while enhancing their nationally recognized quality patient care.
Intellectual Property and Licensing
Our success and ability to compete is dependent on our ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspects of our technology and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We rely primarily on a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and other similar measures to protect our proprietary information. For example, we license rather than sell our software to customers and require licensees to enter into license agreements that impose certain restrictions on licensees ability to utilize the software. We have applied for three U.S. patents covering our core XML technology, one of which is a provisional application. We have no patents or patent applications pending in any foreign countries. We have two U.S. trademark registrations and three pending trademark applications. Additionally, we have filed three intent-to-use trademark applications in the United States for our product names and corporate logo. We own the registration rights for five Internet domain names, including those pertaining to our company name, one of our subsidiarys company name and certain aspects of our XML technology. There can be no assurance that any of our patents, copyrights or trademarks will not be challenged or invalidated.
We also enter into license agreements with respect to our technology, documentation and other proprietary information. Those licenses are generally non-transferable and typically have a perpetual term. Despite our best efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology that we consider proprietary and third parties may attempt to develop similar technology independently. In particular, we provide our licensees with access to object code versions of our software, and other proprietary information underlying our licensed software. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, particularly because the global nature of the
59
From time to time we integrate third-party software into our products. This third-party software may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms. We currently license software from DT Software, Inc. under a perpetual license agreement for indexing functionality in our Sequoia XML Portal Server software. We also license the same software from DT Software, Inc. under a perpetual license agreement for indexing functionality in our Xdex software.
Overall, the protection of our proprietary rights may not be adequate and our competitors may independently develop similar technology. Due to rapid technological change, we believe that factors such as the technological and creative skill of our personnel, new product developments and enhancements to existing products are more important than the various legal protections of our technology to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position.
We do not believe that any of our products, trademarks, copyrights or other proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of third parties except for one instance. In July 1999, we received a notice from NetRight Technologies, Inc., objecting to our use of the mark iManage. We had ceased using the mark prior to the receipt of the notice and we do not anticipate any further action. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future with respect to current or future products. Further, we expect that software product developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps.
All of our employees sign nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements. From time to time, we hire or retain employees or consultants who have worked for independent software vendors or other companies developing products similar to those offered by us. Those prior employers may claim that our products are based on their products and that we have misappropriated their intellectual property. Any claims of that variety, with or without merit, could cause a significant diversion of management attention, result in costly and protracted litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Those royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which would have a material adverse affect on our business. For additional discussion regarding our intellectual property risk, see Risk FactorsOur software products rely on our intellectual property, and any failure by us to protect our intellectual property could enable competitors to market products with similar features that may reduce demand for our products. on page 13.
Competition
The market for e-business solutions is rapidly changing and intensely competitive, and is likely to become more competitive as the number of entrants and new technologies increases. We believe that, while none of our competitors or potential competitors currently produces a solution comparable to ours, we face current or potential competition from large software vendors, vendors of proprietary enterprise application integration and application server
60
We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our market include:
| product quality and performance; | |
| interoperability of solution with existing applications; | |
| breadth and depth of solution; | |
| the number of customers; | |
| the number of strategic alliances; | |
| speed and ease of deployment; | |
| strength of sales channels; and | |
| customer service. |
Although we believe our solution currently competes favorably with respect to these factors, our market is relatively new and rapidly evolving. We may not be able to maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors, especially those with greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical and other resources, such as larger customer bases and greater brand recognition. Additionally, some of our competitors may be able to secure alliances with customers and affiliates on more favorable terms than we can.
Employees
As of February 7, 2000, we employed 157 full-time employees, which included 53 in sales and marketing, 19 in expert product services and product support, 61 in research and development and 24 in administration, operations, and finance. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified technical and management personnel, for whom competition is intense. As of February 7, 2000, all of our employees own options to purchase our stock. From time to time, we have employed, and will continue to employ, independent contractors and consultants to support research and development, marketing and sales, and business development. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a strike or similar work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Facilities
Our principal administrative, sales, marketing and research and development facility is located in Columbia, Maryland and consists of approximately 21,635 square feet of office space held under a lease that expires in July 2002. We are currently negotiating a lease for an approximately 60,000 square foot facility in Columbia, Maryland as a replacement for our
61
We also maintain sales and support personnel in Chicago, Illinois; New York, New York; San Jose, California; and St. Louis, Missouri.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to routine litigation and proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are not aware of any current or pending litigation to which we are or may be a party that we believe could materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
62
MANAGEMENT
Our Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information with respect to our directors and executive officers as of February 7, 2000:
Name | Age | Position | ||
Richard C. Faint, Jr. | 48 | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | ||
Mark A. Wesker | 38 | President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | ||
Gregory G. Heard | 35 | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary | ||
Anil Sethi | 40 | Chief Technology Officer, Vice President and Assistant Secretary | ||
Marc E. Rubin | 36 | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President, Assistant Treasurer and Secretary | ||
Kenneth E. Tighe | 41 | Executive Vice President, Sales | ||
Marvin W. Adams(2) | 42 | Director | ||
Lawrence A. Bettino(1) | 39 | Director | ||
Andrew J. Filipowski | 49 | Director | ||
Jonathan I. Grabel(1)(2) | 30 | Director | ||
William M. Gust II(1)(2) | 56 | Director |
(1) | Member of the audit committee. |
(2) | Member of the compensation committee. |
Richard C. Faint, Jr. has been our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since July 1996. Mr. Faint served as Chief Financial Officer of Mergent Technologies from September 1995 to July 1996. Previously, from January 1995 to September 1995, Mr. Faint was the Chief Financial Officer of Performance Learning Group which merged with Mergent Technologies in September 1995. From December 1984 to January 1995, Mr. Faint served as Chief Financial Officer of PersonaCare, a company that he co-founded. PersonaCare was acquired by TheraTx, which later completed its initial public offering. Mr. Faint received his B.S. in Accounting and Finance from Towson University and his J.D. and M.B.A. from The University of Baltimore.
Mark A. Wesker co-founded our company and has been our President, Chief Operating Officer and a director since joining our company in November 1992. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Wesker was an attorney with the law firm of Miles & Stockbridge from May 1986 to November 1992. Mr. Wesker received his B.A. in Political Science from The George Washington University and his J.D. from The University of Baltimore. Mr. Wesker is Mr. Sethis brother-in-law.
Gregory G. Heard has been our Chief Financial Officer and Vice President since joining us in January 2000 and is currently our Treasurer and Assistant Secretary. From
63
Anil Sethi co-founded our company in April 1992 and is currently our Chief Technology Officer, Vice President and our Assistant Secretary. Since July 1996, Mr. Sethi has served as our Chief Technology Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Sethi served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to co-founding our company, Mr. Sethi also co-founded Dakota Imaging in November 1990. Between 1983 and 1990, Mr. Sethi served in various Systems Engineering positions for Hewlett Packard, the U.S. Navy and Apple Computer. Mr. Sethi received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a concentration in Biomedical Engineering from the Catholic University of America. Mr. Sethi is Mr. Weskers brother-in-law.
Marc E. Rubin has been our Chief Accounting Officer and Vice President since January 2000 and is our Secretary and Assistant Treasurer. Prior to that, from November 1995 to December 1999, Mr. Rubin served as our Chief Financial Officer. From December 1994 to October 1995, Mr. Rubin was the Manager of Financial Planning and Analysis at Black & Decker Canada. From July 1990 to December 1994, Mr. Rubin was Senior Internal Auditor for Black & Decker Corporation. Mr. Rubin received his B.A. in Accounting and his M.B.A. from The University of Baltimore.
Kenneth E. Tighe has been our Executive Vice President, Sales since July 1999. From May 1994, Mr. Tighe served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Radian Systems, Inc., a company that he founded in May 1994, which is currently our wholly owned subsidiary. Prior to that, from September 1989 to May 1994, Mr. Tighe served as Vice President of Sales & Marketing at INTRAFED, Inc. Mr. Tighe received a B.S. in Marketing from The University of Maryland.
Marvin W. Adams has been a director since February 2000. Mr. Adams is Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of Bank One Corporation, which positions he has held since December 1998 and October 1998, respectively. Prior to that, from February 1997 to October 1998, Mr. Adams served as Chief Technology and Information Officer of Banc One Corporation. From June 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Adams served as Chief Information Officer of Frontier Communications Corporation. From April 1994 to June 1996, Mr. Adams served as President of Financial Card Services of Banc One Corporation. Mr. Adams received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State University.
Lawrence A. Bettino has been a director since November 1999. Mr. Bettino is a general partner of Baker Communications Fund, L.P., a communications-focused private equity fund, a position he has held since May 1996. From July 1989 to April 1996, Mr. Bettino worked for Dillon Read Venture Capital. Mr. Bettino is currently a director of Connected Corporation, Curl Corporation, NetOps Corporation, NextPoint Networks, Inc. and S2 Systems, Inc. Mr. Bettino received his B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute and his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
64
Andrew J. Filipowski has been a director since November 1999. Mr. Filipowski has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of divine interVentures, inc. since its inception and was President from its inception until October 1999. He has also been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Platinum Venture Partners, Inc., the previous general partner of the Platinum Venture Partners limited partnerships. Mr. Filipowski was a founder of PLATINUM Technology International Inc. and served as the Chairman of its Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President from its inception in 1987 until it was acquired by Computer Associates in June 1999. Mr. Filipowski is currently a director of Blue Rhino Corporation, Bluestone Software Inc., eShare Technologies, Inc., Platinum Entertainment, Inc. and System Software Associates, Inc.
Jonathan I. Grabel has been a director since November 1999. Mr. Grabel is a partner with Baker Communications Fund, L.P., a communications-focused private equity fund. From August 1996 to August 1998, Mr. Grabel was an investment banker with Nomura Securities International, Inc. and Warburg Dillon Read LLC. Mr. Grabel is currently a director of S2 Systems, Inc. Mr. Grabel received his B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and his M.B.A. from The University of Chicago. Mr. Grabel is a Certified Public Accountant.
William M. Gust II has been a director since November 1996. Since September 1994, Mr. Gust has been President of Mariner Management, Inc., the management company for Anthem Capital L.P., a venture capital partnership, of which he has been a Managing General Partner since September 1994. Mr. Gust is currently a director of CyberSystem Technologies, Inc., Mensana Diagnostics Corp. and WisdomWare, Inc. Mr. Gust received his B.A. in Creative Writing and English Literature from Northwestern University.
Officers serve at the discretion of the board of directors. All of the current directors were elected as our directors pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Agreement dated November 23, 1999, between our company and some of our stockholders. The voting provisions of this agreement will automatically terminate upon the closing of the offering.
In connection with the closing of our sale of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999, several of our previous directors resigned, including Anil Sethi, Marc Benson, Kenneth Homa, Philip Vermeulin and Charles Vickers.
Board Composition
We currently have seven authorized directors. Upon the closing of the offering, our charter will provide that the terms of the directors will be divided into three classes. Class I director terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2001. Class II director terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2002. Class III director terms will expire at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2003. The Class I directors are Messrs. Bettino and Filipowski. The Class II directors are Messrs. Faint and Gust. The Class III directors are Messrs. Adams, Grabel and Wesker. At each annual meeting of stockholders after the initial classification or special meeting in lieu of the annual meeting, the successors to directors whose terms will then expire will be elected to serve
65
Board Committees
Our bylaws provide that our board of directors may designate one or more board committees. We currently have an audit committee and a compensation committee.
Our audit committee, currently comprised of Messrs. Bettino, Grabel and Gust:
| recommends to our board of directors the independent auditors to conduct the annual audit of our books and records; | |
| reviews the proposed scope and results of the audit; | |
| approves the audit fees to be paid; | |
| reviews accounting and financial controls with the independent public accountants and our financial and accounting staff; and | |
| reviews and approves transactions between us and our directors, officers and affiliates. |
Our compensation committee, currently comprised of Messrs. Adams, Grabel and Gust:
| reviews and recommends the compensation arrangements for management, including the compensation for our president and chief executive officer; | |
| establishes and reviews general compensation policies with the objective to attract and retain superior talent, to reward individual performance and to achieve our financial goals; and | |
| administers our stock option plan. |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
From November 1996 to November 1999, members of our compensation committee were Messrs. Gust, Benson and Faint. Mr. Faint has been our chief executive officer since July 1996. From November 1999 to January 2000, members of our compensation committee were Messrs. Grabel and Gust. From January 2000 to the present, the members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Grabel, Gust and Adams. None of our executive officers has served as a member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity whose executive officers served as a director of our company or as a member of our compensation committee.
66
Director Compensation
Our directors have received no compensation for serving as directors. We reimburse our directors for reasonable expenses they incur to attend board and committee meetings.
Our non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of options to acquire our common stock pursuant to our stock plan. In July 1996 and March 1999, we granted to Mr. Homa options to purchase 25,000 and 12,500 shares of our common stock, respectively at exercise prices of $0.04 and $0.52 per share, respectively. In March 1999, we granted to Messrs. Benson, Gust, Vermeulin and Vickers options to purchase 18,750, 25,000, 6,250 and 12,500 shares, respectively, of our common stock at exercise prices of $0.52 per share, respectively. (See Stock Option Plan)
Executive Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to our chief executive officer and the other four most highly paid executive officers whose total salary and bonus exceed $100,000 for the year ended December 31, 1999, whom we refer to as our named executive officers:
Summary Compensation Table
Long-Term | ||||||||||||
1999 Annual | Compensation | |||||||||||
Compensation | ||||||||||||
Securities | ||||||||||||
Name and Principal Positions | Salary | Bonus | Underlying Options | |||||||||
Richard C. Faint, Jr. Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | $ | 156,667 | $ | 17,500 | 62,500 | (1) | ||||||
12,500 | (2) | |||||||||||
Mark A. Wesker President, Chief Operating Officer and Director | 131,667 | 17,500 | 50,000 | (1) | ||||||||
Anil Sethi Chief Technology Officer, Vice President and Secretary | 125,833 | 12,500 | 37,500 | (1) | ||||||||
Marc E. Rubin Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary | 102,500 | 15,000 | 12,500 | (3) | ||||||||
Kenneth E. Tighe (4) Executive Vice President, Sales | 105,756 | | 37,500 | (1) |
(1) | Options vest according to the following schedule: 50% of the options vest immediately and the remaining 50% of the options vest ratably on each of the two anniversaries following the date of grant. Options expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. |
(2) | Options vest immediately and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. |
(3) | Options vest ratably on each of the four anniversaries following the date of grant. Options expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. |
(4) | Mr. Tighe joined us as executive vice president, sales in July 1999. Mr. Tighe earned $105,756 in 1999, but his annual base salary for 1999 was $156,000. |
67
Option Grants in 1999 and Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth information regarding options granted to the named executive officers during 1999.
Option Grants In Last Fiscal Year
Individual Grants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent of | Potential Realizable Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Total | at Assumed Annual Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Options | of Stock Price Appreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Granted to | Exercise or | for Option Term(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options | Employees | Base Price | Expiration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Positions | Granted | in 1999(1) | ($/Share) | Date(2) | 0% | 5% | 10% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Richard C. Faint, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 12,500 | 1.68% | $ | 0.52 | 3/5/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard C. Faint, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | 62,500 | 8.41% | $ | 2.80 | 11/23/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Wesker, President and Chief Operating Officer | 50,000 | 6.73% | $ | 2.80 | 11/23/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Anil Sethi, Chief Technology Officer | 37,500 | 5.04% | $ | 2.80 | 11/23/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Marc E. Rubin, Chief Accounting Officer | 12,500 | 1.68% | $ | 0.52 | 3/5/09 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Kenneth E. Tighe, Executive Vice President, Sales | 37,500 | 5.04% | $ | 2.80 | 11/23/09 |
(1) | Based on options to purchase 743,457 shares of our common stock granted to employees in 1999. |
(2) | The options have ten year terms, subject to earlier termination upon death, disability or termination of employment. |
(3) | We recommend caution in interpreting the financial significance of the figures representing the potential realizable value of the stock options. They are calculated by multiplying the number of options granted by the difference between a future hypothetical stock price and the option exercise price and are shown pursuant to rules of the SEC. They assume the fair value of common stock appreciates 0%, 5% or 10% each year, compounded annually, for ten years (the term of each option). They are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of our stock price or to establish a present value of options. Also, if appreciation does occur at the 5% or 10% per year rate, the amounts shown would not be realized by the recipients until the year 2003. Depending on inflation rates, these amounts may be worth significantly less in 2003, in real terms, than their value today. |
68
Year-End Options Values
Securities Underlying | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unexercised Options at | in-the-Money Options at | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | December 31, 1999 | December 31, 1999(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired On | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Exercise | Realized | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||||||||||
Richard C. Faint, Jr. | | $ | | 293,750 | 31,250 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mark A. Wesker | | | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Anil Sethi | | | 18,750 | 18,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marc E. Rubin | | | 75,000 | 12,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kenneth E. Tighe | | | 18,750 | 18,750 |
(1) | Calculated on the basis of the initial public offering price of our common stock, less the exercise price payable for those shares, multiplied by the number of shares underlying the option. |
No compensation intended to serve as incentive for performance to occur over a period longer than one year was paid pursuant to a long-term incentive plan during the last year to any of the executive officers named above.
Employment Arrangements
We have entered into an employment agreement with each of our named executive officers. Each agreement has an initial term of two years and is automatically extended for additional one year terms unless we or the executive elects to terminate the agreement upon 180 days notice. These executives are also eligible to receive an annual bonus. If his employment is terminated by us without cause, we will continue to pay him his base salary either through the end of the two-year period of his agreement or for one year, whichever is greater, as well as any bonus amounts, if any, accrued through the date of termination. Each executive is entitled to participate in our 401(k) Plan and our stock option plan, as well as such other employee benefit plans or arrangements as provided to other senior executives.
The following table shows information about the compensation arrangements for our named executives officers as of February 1, 2000:
Named Executive Officer | Annual Base Salary | |||
Richard C. Faint, Jr. | $ | 175,000 | ||
Mark A. Wesker | 150,000 | |||
Kenneth E. Tighe | 156,000 | |||
Anil Sethi | 125,000 | |||
Gregory G. Heard | 115,000 | |||
Marc E. Rubin | 115,000 |
In addition, each of these executives has agreed not to reveal any confidential information belonging to us, except as may be required in the course of performing his duties as our employee. He has also agreed to assign to us any rights which he may have with respect to inventions, software programs, data or other developments created or discovered during his employment term. He has also agreed that while he is employed by us, and for one year after his termination he will not compete with any business we conduct, and that during his employment and for two years after his termination, he will not solicit any of our employees.
69
Stock Option Plan
In January 2000, we adopted a stock option plan to promote our long-term growth and profitability by providing our people with incentives to improve stockholder value and contribute to our growth and financial success. We believe our stock option plan will assist us in attracting, retaining and rewarding the best available people.
The compensation committee of our board of directors has been given broad authority to administer our stock incentive plan. The compensation committee may grant the following types of awards under our stock incentive plan to our employees, officers, directors and consultants:
| incentive and nonstatutory stock options; | |
| stock appreciation rights; | |
| restricted and unrestricted stock awards; | |
| phantom stock awards; | |
| performance awards; and | |
| other stock-based awards. |
The compensation committee determines the size and terms of all awards under our stock option plan. However, no more than an aggregate of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding after the closing of the offering on a fully diluted basis at any given time, plus the number of any shares surrendered to us in connection with any award, may be issued under stock incentive plan awards. These share amounts may be adjusted for future stock dividends, spin-offs, split-ups, recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, business combinations, exchanges of shares and the like.
While no options, or any other awards, have been granted under our stock option plan, our stock option plan incorporates options previously granted outside of any plan. Of these previously granted options, a total of 173 employees, officers, directors and key consultants hold options to purchase 1,820,919 shares of our common stock as of February 7, 2000. Of this number, 1,018,563 options are vested.
Our stock option plan terminates automatically on January 28, 2010, but our board of directors may amend or terminate it at any time.
The following is a summary of the types of awards that we may grant under our stock incentive plan:
Stock Options. The compensation committee may grant options to purchase shares of our common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options. The exercise price of each option will be determined by the compensation committee, but the exercise price of any incentive stock option may not be less than the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
The term of each option will be fixed by the compensation committee, but the term of any incentive stock option may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. The
70
To exercise an option, the optionee must pay the exercise price in full either in cash or cash equivalents or by delivery of shares of common stock already owned by the optionee. The exercise price may also be delivered by a broker under irrevocable instructions to the broker from the optionee.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The compensation committee may grant a right to receive a number of shares, an amount in cash or a combination of shares and cash, based on the increase in the fair market value of the shares of our common stock underlying the right during a period specified by the compensation committee. The compensation committee may grant these stock appreciation rights alone or in connection with stock options. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right that is related to a stock option, the holder will surrender the option for the number of shares as to which the stock appreciation right is exercised and will receive payment of an amount computed as described in the stock appreciation right award. A stock appreciation right granted in connection with a stock option will usually be exercisable at the time or times, and only to the extent that, the related stock option is exercisable and will not be transferable except to the extent the related option is transferable.
Restricted and Unrestricted Stock. The compensation committee may also award shares of our common stock to participants. These stock awards may be conditioned on the achievement of performance goals and/or continued employment with us through a specified restriction period. If the performance goals and any other restrictions are not attained, the holder will forfeit his or her restricted shares. The compensation committee may also grant shares of common stock that are free from any restrictions under our stock option plan. Unrestricted shares of common stock may be issued to participants in recognition of past services or in lieu of cash compensation. The purchase price, if any, for shares of our common stock under stock awards will be determined by the compensation committee.
Phantom Stock Awards. The compensation committee may also grant phantom stock awards to participants. These awards are contractual rights that are equivalent in value to, but not actual shares of, our common stock. Phantom stock awards may be conditioned on the achievement of performance goals and/or continued employment with us through a specified date. The compensation committee will determine the time or times when a participant will be paid the value of the phantom stock award, and the payment may be in cash, in shares of our common stock or in a combination of cash and common stock. Because phantom stock awards are not actual shares of our common stock, they do not have any voting rights.
Performance Stock Awards. The compensation committee may also grant performance stock awards to receive shares of our common stock upon achievement of performance goals and other conditions determined by the compensation committee.
71
Other Stock-based Awards. The compensation committee is authorized to grant to participants other awards that may be based on or related to our common stock or other securities. These could include:
| convertible or exchangeable debt securities; | |
| other rights convertible or exchangeable into shares; | |
| purchase rights for shares or other securities; and | |
| incentive awards with value and payment contingent upon performance. |
The compensation committee will determine whether other stock-based awards will be paid in our common stock, other securities, cash or a combination of these mediums.
401(k) Plan
We adopted a tax-qualified employee savings and retirement plan, or 401(k) plan, covering our full-time employees located in the United States. The 401(k) plan is intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, so that contributions to the 401(k) plan by employees, and the investment earnings thereon, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) plan. Under the 401(k) plan, employees may elect to reduce their current compensation up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit and have the amount of such contribution contributed to the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan also permits us to make matching contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of participants in the 401(k).
Limitation of Directors Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our Charter limits the liability of directors to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. Maryland law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
| any breach of their duty of loyalty to the company or its stockholders; | |
| acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law; | |
| unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or | |
| any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. |
This limitation does not apply to liabilities arising under federal law and state securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.
Section 2-418 of the Maryland General Corporation Law permits indemnification of directors, officers, employees and agents of a corporation under certain conditions and subject to limitations. Our Charter and bylaws provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 2-418, including circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary. Section 2-418 also empowers us to
72
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought. We are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification. We currently have liability insurance for our directors and officers and intend to extend that coverage for public securities matters.
73
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Sales of Stock
In November 1996, we issued 2,016,221 shares of series A redeemable convertible preferred stock at a price of $0.99 per share, including 1,008,110 shares to Anthem Capital of which Mr. Gust, one of our directors, is managing general partner and 226,825 shares to Mr. Faint, who is also our chairman of the board and chief executive officer. In connection with this transaction we also issued 75,609 shares of series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to Mr. Homa and 504,055 shares of series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson is a vice president. At the time of this transaction, each of Messrs. Homa and Benson were directors.
In July 1998 and September 1998, we issued a total of 2,411,984 shares of series B redeemable convertible preferred stock at a price of $2.71 per share, including 252,573 shares to Anthem Capital of which Mr. Gust, one of our directors is managing general partner. In connection with this transaction, we also issued 126,287 shares of series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson is a vice president; 536,005 shares of series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to the Nelson Bunker Hunt Estate Trust B, of which Mr. Vickers is trustee; and 1,108,976 shares of series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to Flanders Language Valley Fund, of which Mr. Vermeulin is managing director. At the time of this transaction, each of Messrs. Benson, Vickers and Vermeulin were directors.
In July 1999, we acquired Radian Systems for a purchase price of $4,950,000, including 1,400,000 shares of our common stock and the issuance of promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $3,500,000.
In May 1999, we issued convertible promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000. This transaction included the issuance of:
| convertible promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $400,000 and warrants to purchase 25,487 shares series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Mr. Faint, our chairman of the board and chief executive officer. We converted these notes into 101,946 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999; | |
| convertible promissory notes in aggregate principal amount of $433,000 and warrants to purchase 27,263 shares series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Anthem Capital, of which Mr. Gust, a director, is managing general partner. We converted this note into 109,049 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999; | |
| a convertible promissory note in aggregate principal amount of $450,000 and a warrant to purchase 27,676 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Mr. Filipowski, a director. We converted this note into 110,702 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999; and | |
| a convertible promissory note in aggregate principal amount of $167,000 and a warrant to purchase 10,594 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson, a former director, is a vice president. |
74
We converted this note into 42,373 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999. |
In November 1999, we issued 6,210,258 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock at a price per share of $4.11 and warrants to purchase 1,704,311 shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock. This transaction included the issuance of 3,646,300 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 1,278,233 shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock to Baker Communications Fund, L.P., of which, two of our directors, Messrs. Bettino and Grabel, are principals. In addition, we issued 1,215,433 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase 426,078 shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock to divine interVentures, inc. of which Mr. Filipowski, one of our directors, is chairman of the board and chief executive officer. In connection with this transaction, we also issued warrants:
| to purchase 63,288 shares of our common stock to Anthem Capital, of which Mr. Gust, a director, is managing general partner; | |
| to purchase 11,387 shares of our common stock to Richard Faint, Jr., our chairman of the board and chief executive officer; | |
| to purchase 31,644 shares of our common stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson, a former director, is vice president; | |
| to purchase 3,796 shares of our common stock to Mr. Homa, a former director; | |
| to purchase 26,908 shares of our common stock to the Nelson Bunker Hunt Estate Trust B, of which Mr. Vickers, a former director, is trustee; and | |
| to purchase 55,672 shares of our common stock to Flanders Language Valley Fund, of which Mr. Vermeulin, a former director, is managing director. |
In January 2000, Mr. Faint, our chairman of the board and chief executive officer, exercised an option to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share.
In connection with the preferred stock financings, we granted registration rights to the preferred stockholders. Upon exercise of these registration rights, these stockholders can require us to file registration statements covering the sale of shares of common stock held by them and may include the sale of their shares in registration statements covering our sale of shares to the public.
We believe that all transactions set forth above were made on terms no less favorable to us than we would have obtained from unaffiliated third-parties. We have a policy whereby all future transactions between us and our officers, directors and affiliates will be on terms no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unrelated third-parties. These transactions must be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our board of directors.
Employment Agreements
We have employment agreements with our executive officers as described in ManagementEmployment Agreements.
75
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of December 31, 1999 and as adjusted to reflect the sale of the shares offered hereby, by:
| each person who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock; | |
| each member of our board of directors; | |
| each of our named executive officers; and | |
| all directors and executive officers as a group. |
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each stockholder listed is c/o Sequoia Software Corporation, 5457 Twin Knolls Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the persons named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all the shares indicated.
For purposes of calculating the percentage beneficially owned, shares of common stock equivalents are deemed outstanding before the offering, including 4,210,532 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 7, 2000 and 10,638,463 shares of common stock equivalents issuable upon conversion of the preferred stock. For purposes of calculating the percentage beneficially owned, the number of shares deemed outstanding after the offering includes: (a) all shares deemed to be outstanding before the offering and (b) shares being sold in this offering, assuming no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. Share ownership in each case includes shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding options and warrants that are exercisable within 60 days of February 7, 2000, as described in the footnotes below.
Percent of Ownership | |||||||||||||
Number of | |||||||||||||
Shares | Before | After | |||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Beneficially Owned | Offering | Offering | ||||||||||
Baker Communications Fund, L.P.(1) | 4,924,533 | 30.5 | % | ||||||||||
540 Madison Avenue | |||||||||||||
New York, NY 10022 | |||||||||||||
divine interVentures, inc.(2) | 1,641,511 | 10.7 | |||||||||||
4225 Naperville Road | |||||||||||||
Suite 400 | |||||||||||||
Lisle, IL 60532 | |||||||||||||
Anthem Capital, L.P.(3) | 1,485,283 | 9.9 | |||||||||||
16 South Calvert Street | |||||||||||||
Suite 800 | |||||||||||||
Baltimore, MD 21202-1305 | |||||||||||||
Flanders Language Valley Fund, C.V.A. | 1,322,520 | 8.9 | |||||||||||
B-8900 IEPER | |||||||||||||
Belgium | |||||||||||||
Lawrence A. Bettino(1) | 4,924,533 | 30.5 | |||||||||||
Jonathan I. Grabel(1) | 4,924,533 | 30.5 |
76
Percent of Ownership | ||||||||||||
Number of | ||||||||||||
Shares | Before | After | ||||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Beneficially Owned | Offering | Offering | |||||||||
Andrew J. Filipowski(2)(4) | 1,779,889 | 11.6 | % | |||||||||
William M. Gust II(3) | 1,485,283 | 9.9 | ||||||||||
Marvin W. Adams(5) | 12,500 | * | ||||||||||
Philip Vermeulin(6) | 1,328,770 | 8.9 | ||||||||||
Anil Sethi(7) | 1,268,750 | 8.5 | ||||||||||
Mark A. Wesker(8) | 1,275,000 | 8.6 | ||||||||||
Kenneth E. Tighe(9) | 772,374 | 5.2 | ||||||||||
Richard C. Faint, Jr.(10) | 659,395 | 4.4 | ||||||||||
Marc E. Rubin(11) | 78,125 | * | ||||||||||
Gregory G. Heard(12) | | * | ||||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons) | 17,180,382 | 94.4 | % |
* | Less than one percent |
(1) | Includes 1,278,233 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Mr. Bettino, a director, is a founding partner and general partner of Baker Communications Fund, L.P., the management company for Baker Communications Fund, L.P. Mr. Grabel, a director, is a partner of the Baker Communications Fund, L.P. Messrs. Bettino and Grabel share voting and dispositive control over these shares, and disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of their pecuniary interest. Messrs. Bettinos and Grabels address is c/o Baker Communications Fund, L.P., 540 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022. | |
(2) | Includes 426,078 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. Mr. Filipowski, a director, is chairman of the board of directors and chief executive officer of divine interVentures. Mr. Filipowski shares voting and dispositive control over shares beneficially held by divine interVentures. Mr. Filipowski disclaims beneficial ownership of shares beneficially held by divine interVentures except to the extent of his pecuniary interest. Mr. Filipowskis address is c/o divine interVentures, inc., 4225 Naperville Road, Suite 400, Lisle, IL 60532. | |
(3) | Includes 90,551 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and 25,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. Mr. Gust is the managing general partner of Anthem Capital. Mr. Gust shares voting and dispositive control over these shares. Mr. Gust disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest. Mr. Gusts address is c/o Anthem Capital, 16 South Calvert Street, Suite 800, Baltimore, MD 21202-1305. | |
(4) | Includes 27,676 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants held by Mr. Filipowski. | |
(5) | Includes 12,500 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. | |
(6) | Includes 87,247 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and 6,250 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. Mr. Vermeulin is managing |
77
director of Flanders Language Valley Fund, C.V.A. Mr. Vermeulin shares voting and dispositive control over shares beneficially held by Flanders Language Valley Fund, C.V.A. except to the extent of his pecuniary interest. Mr. Vermeulins address is c/o Flanders Language Valley Fund, C.V.A., B-8900 IEPER, Belgium. | ||
(7) | Includes 18,750 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. Mr. Sethi intends to grant the underwriters the right to purchase up to 50,000 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option. | |
(8) | Includes 25,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. Mr. Wesker intends to grant the underwriters the right to purchase up to 50,000 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option. | |
(9) | Includes 18,750 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. |
(10) | Includes 43,750 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock and 36,874 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. |
(11) | Includes 78,125 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. Mr. Rubin intends to grant the underwriters the right to purchase up to 10,000 shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option. |
(12) | Includes 6,250 shares issuable upon exercise of options to acquire our common stock. |
78
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
General
After the offering and the filing of our charter, our authorized capital stock will consist of 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 55,000,000 shares of undesignated capital stock.
The following table sets forth our outstanding securities as of January 1, 2000.
Description | Number of Shares | ||||
Common stock | 3,960,532 | ||||
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock | 2,016,221 | ||||
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock | 2,411,984 | ||||
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock | 6,210,258 | ||||
Warrants for common stock | 222,303 | ||||
Options for common stock | 1,647,669 | ||||
Warrants for series C redeemable convertible preferred stock | 312,952 | ||||
Warrants for series D redeemable convertible preferred stock | 1,704,311 | ||||
Total: | 18,486,230 | ||||
At January 1, 2000, there were 13 holders of record of our common stock. Our series A, B and C redeemable convertible preferred stock are held of record by five, seven and 27 stockholders, respectively. Immediately prior to the closing of the offering, all outstanding shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock will be converted into 10,638,463 shares of common stock and will no longer be issued and outstanding.
After this offering, we will have outstanding, shares of common stock if the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option, or shares of common stock if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
The following summary description of our capital stock, charter and bylaws is not intended to be complete and assumes the filing as of the closing of the offering of our an amended and restated charter. This description is qualified by reference to the provisions of applicable law and to our amended and restated charter and bylaws filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Common Stock
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such lawful dividends as may be declared by the board of directors. However, such dividends are subject to preferences that may be applicable to the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the affairs of our company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the holders of common stock will be entitled to receive pro rata all of our remaining assets available for distribution to stockholders. Any such pro rata distribution would be subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock. Our common stock has no preemptive,
79
Preferred Stock
At the closing of the offering, our outstanding shares of preferred stock will be converted into common stock. For a description of this preferred stock, please see note 9 to the notes to financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Undesignated Capital Stock
Immediately following the offering, our board will have the authority to designate and issue up to 55,000,000 shares of capital stock, in one or more series. Our board can establish the preferences, rights and privileges of each series, which may be superior to the rights of the common stock.
Issuance of Options
In July 1996 and March 1999, we granted to Mr. Homa options to purchase 25,000 and 12,500 shares of our common stock at exercise prices of $0.04 and $0.52 per share, respectively. In March 1999, we granted to Messrs. Benson, Faint, Gust, Vermeulin and Vickers options to purchase 18,750, 12,500, 25,000, 6,250 and 12,500 shares, respectively, of our common stock at exercise prices of $0.52 per share, respectively. Messrs. Benson, Faint, Gust, Homa, Vermeulin and Vickers were granted options in connection with their services as members of our board of directors. Messrs. Benson, Vickers, Homa, Vermeulin and Sethi resigned from the board of directors effective as of November 1999.
In July 1996 and November 1999, we granted to Mr. Faint options to purchase 250,000 and 62,500 shares of our common stock at exercise prices of $0.04 and $2.80 per share, respectively. In January 2000, Mr. Faint exercised the option to purchase 250,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.04 per share. In July 1996 and March 1999, we granted to Mr. Rubin options to purchase 75,000 and 12,500 shares of our common stock at exercise prices of $0.04 and $0.52 per share, respectively. In November 1999, we granted to Messrs. Sethi, Tighe and Wesker options to purchase 37,500, 37,500 and 50,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock at exercise prices of $2.80 per share, respectively. Messrs. Faint, Rubin, Sethi, Tighe and Wesker were granted options in connection with their services as officers.
In January 2000 and February 2000, we granted to Mr. Heard options to purchase 25,000 and 25,000 shares of our common stock at exercise prices of $2.80 and $2.80 per share, respectively. In February 2000, we granted to Messrs. Faint and Wesker options to purchase 200,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock at exercise prices of $2.80 per share, respectively. Messrs. Heard, Wesker and Faint were granted options in connection with their services as officers. In February 2000, we granted to Mr. Adams an
80
Issuance of Warrants
In May 1999 in connection with the issuance of $5,000,000 in convertible promissory notes, we granted warrants to purchase an aggregate of 312,952 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock at an exercise price per share of $4.11 to several entities and individuals including:
| a warrant to purchase 25,487 shares series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Mr. Faint, our chairman of the board and chief executive officer; | |
| a warrant to purchase 27,676 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Mr. Filipowski, a director; | |
| a warrant to purchase 27,623 shares series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to Anthem Capital, of which Mr. Gust, a director, is managing general partner; and | |
| a warrant to purchase 10,594 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson, a former director, is vice president. |
Upon the closing of this offering, the warrants to purchase our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock shall become exercisable for our common stock.
In connection with the sale of our Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999, we granted warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,704,311 shares of our Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock at an exercise price per share of $4.50 to Baker Communications Fund, L.P. and divine interVentures, inc. Messrs. Bettino and Grabel, each a director, are principals of Baker Communications Fund, L.P. Mr. Filipowski, a director, is president and chief executive officer of divine interVentures. The exercise of the warrant held by Baker Communications Fund, L.P. is subject to regulatory approvals including under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.
In connection with the sale of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 1999, we also issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 222,303 shares of our common stock for an exercise price per share of $4.50, including:
| a warrant to purchase 63,288 shares of our common stock to Anthem Capital, of which Mr. Gust, a director, is managing general partner; | |
| a warrant to purchase 11,387 shares of our common stock to Mr. Faint, Jr., our chairman of the board and chief executive officer; | |
| a warrant to purchase 31,644 shares of our common stock to NEPA Ventures, of which Mr. Benson, a former director, is vice president; | |
| a warrant to purchase 3,796 shares of our common stock to Mr. Homa, a former director; |
81
| a warrant to purchase 26,908 shares of our common stock to the Nelson Bunker Hunt Estate Trust B, of which Mr. Vickers, a former director, is trustee; and |
| a warrant to purchase 55,672 shares of our common stock to Flanders Language Valley Fund, of which Mr. Vermeulin, a former director, is managing director. |
Registration Rights
After this offering, holders of (i) an aggregate of 2,016,221 shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of the series A redeemable convertible preferred stock; (ii) 2,411,984 shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of the series B redeemable convertible preferred stock; (iii) 6,210,258 shares of common stock issued upon the conversion of the series C redeemable convertible preferred stock; and (iv) 1,704,311 shares of series D redeemable convertible preferred stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants will be entitled to rights with respect to the registration of such shares under the Securities Act.
Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 23, 1999, the holders of our redeemable convertible preferred stock which shall convert automatically into 10,638,463 shares of our common stock have the right to register. Subject to limitations provided in the registration rights agreement, including those in lock-up agreements that these stockholders have signed relating to this offering, these stockholders have the following rights as described below. After the closing of this offering, upon request of Baker Communications Fund L.P., we may be required to register under the Securities Act the sale of an aggregate of at least 20% of the series C and series D registrable shares or having an aggregate offering price of at least $2,000,000. At any time after the closing of the first sale of series C or series D registrable shares pursuant to a series C/ D demand registration, upon request of holders of a majority in interest of at least 50% of the series A and series B registrable shares, we may be required to register under the Securities Act the sale of an aggregate of at least 20% of the series A and series B registrable shares or having an aggregate offering price of at least $2,000,000. The number of demand registrations for each class is limited to two. In addition to these demand registration rights and, subject to conditions and limitations provided in the registration rights agreement, each class of these stockholders may require us to file an unlimited number of registration statements on Form S-3 under the Securities Act with a maximum of two in any 12-month period, when such form is available for our use, generally one year after this offering.
Anti-takeover Effects of Our Charter and Bylaws and Maryland General Corporation Law
Our charter and bylaws and Maryland general corporation law
Certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws could make the following more difficult:
| the acquisition of us by means of a tender offer; | |
| acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or | |
| the removal of our incumbent officers and directors. |
82
These provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of the potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals because negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Classified Board of Directors
Upon the completion of the offering, our amended and restated charter will provide for our board to be divided into three classes of directors. The term of office of the first class, consisting of two directors, will expire at our 2001 annual meeting of our stockholders; the term of office of the second class, consisting of two directors, will expire at our 2002 annual meeting of our stockholders; and the term of office of the third class, consisting of three directors, will expire at our 2003 annual meeting of our stockholders. At each annual meeting we hold after 2003, a class of directors will be elected to replace the class whose term has then expired. As a result, approximately one-third of the members of our board will be elected each year, and each of the directors will serve a staggered three-year term. Also, our amended and restated charter will provide that directors may be removed only for cause, upon the vote of 80% of our outstanding shares of capital stock.
These provisions could prevent a stockholder (or group of stockholders) having majority voting power from obtaining control of our board until the second annual stockholders meeting after the time that the stockholder (or group of stockholders) obtains majority voting power. Therefore, these provisions may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
Special Meetings
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of our stockholders may only be called by a majority of our board, the chairman of the board, our president, our board of directors or upon written request of holders of a majority of our outstanding voting stock. These provisions may make it more difficult for stockholders to take an action that our board opposes.
Undesignated Capital Stock
The authorization of undesignated capital stock will make it possible for our board of directors to issue stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of us. These and other provisions may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control of our company or management.
Anti-Takeover Effects Provisions Of Maryland General Corporation Law
Business Combinations. Maryland general corporation law prohibits specified business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested stockholder. These
83
| anyone who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of the corporations shares; | |
| an affiliate or associate of the corporation who was an interested stockholder or an affiliate or an associate of the interested stockholder at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question. |
These business combinations are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder became an interested stockholder. Thereafter, any of these business combinations must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the vote of:
| at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of voting shares of the corporations voting shares; and | |
| at least 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of the corporations voting other than voting shares held by the interested stockholder or an affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder. |
However, these special voting requirements do not apply if the corporations stockholders receive a minimum price for their shares (as specified in the statute) and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form previously paid by the interested stockholder for its shares.
This business combination statute does not apply to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the corporations board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. A Maryland corporation may adopt an amendment to its charter electing not to be subject to these special voting requirements. Any amendment would have to be approved by at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of outstanding shares of voting stock and 66 2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding shares of voting stock who are not interested stockholders.
Control Share Acquisitions. The Maryland general corporation law provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights unless approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding shares owned by the acquirer or by the corporations officers or directors who are employees of the corporation. Control shares are shares of voting stock which, if aggregated with all other shares of stock previously acquired, would entitle the acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
| 20% or more but less than 33 1/3%; | |
| 33 1/3% or more but less than a majority; or | |
| a majority of all voting power. |
Control shares do not include shares of stock an acquiring person is entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder approval. A control share acquisition
84
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, under specified conditions, including an undertaking to pay expenses, may require the board of directors to call a special stockholders meeting to consider the voting rights of the shares. The meeting must be held within 50 days of the demand. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement as permitted by the statute, the corporation generally may redeem any or all of the control shares, except those for which voting rights have previously been approved. This redemption of shares must be for fair value, determined without regard to voting rights as of the date of the last control share acquisition or of any stockholders meeting at which the voting rights of the shares are considered and not approved. If voting rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the stock determined for purposes of appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid in the control share acquisition. The limitations and restrictions otherwise applicable to the exercise of dissenters rights do not apply in the context of a control share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply to stock acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction, or to acquisitions previously approved or exempted by a provision in the charter or bylaws of the corporation.
Stock Transfer Agent
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is HSBC Bank USA.
85
SHARES AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following the offering could cause the market price of our common stock to fall and could affect our ability to raise capital on terms favorable to us.
After this offering, we will have shares of common stock outstanding. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we will have shares of common stock outstanding. of the shares we sell in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares purchased by our affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144, may generally only be sold in compliance with the limitations of Rule 144, which is summarized below.
Before this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock, and we cannot predict what effect, if any, that market sales of shares of our common stock or the availability of shares of our common stock for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices and could impair our future ability to raise capital through the sale of our equity securities.
The remaining %, or shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, will be restricted shares under the terms of the Securities Act, all of which shares are subject to lock-up agreements as described below. Restricted shares may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rules 144, 144(k) or 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, and subject to the lock-up requirements which rules are summarized below. Subject to the lock-up agreements described below, these restricted shares will be available for resale in the public market as follows:
Number of Shares/ | ||
% of Outstanding | Date of First Availability for Resale | |
/% | Immediately after the date of this prospectus, all of which shares are subject to lock-up agreements | |
/% | 90 days after the date of this prospectus, all of which shares are subject to lock-up agreements | |
/% | At various times between 90 days and 180 days after the date of the prospectus, all of which shares are subject to lock-up agreements |
86
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144, beginning 90 days after the effective date of the offering, a stockholder who owns restricted shares that have been outstanding for at least one year is entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of these restricted shares that does not exceed the greater of:
| one percent of the then outstanding shares of our common stock, or approximately shares immediately after this offering; or | |
| the average weekly trading volume in our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market during the four calendar weeks preceding the sale. |
In addition, our affiliates must comply with the restrictions and requirements of Rule 144, other than the one-year holding period requirement, to sell shares of common stock that are not restricted securities.
Under Rule 144(k), a stockholder who is not currently, and who has not been for at least three months before the sale, an affiliate of ours who owns restricted shares that have been outstanding for at least two years may resell these restricted shares without compliance with the above requirements. The one-and two-year holding periods described above do not begin to run until the full purchase price is paid by the person acquiring the restricted shares from us or an affiliate of ours.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 of the Securities Act as currently in effect, any of our employees, consultants or advisors who purchases shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement are eligible to resell their shares 90 days after the effective date of this offering in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with some restrictions, including the holding period, contained in Rule 144.
Registration rights
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with some of our stockholders, who will own an aggregate of 10,638,463 shares of our common stock following this offering. These stockholders have registration rights which, upon exercise, require us to file registration statements covering the sale of their shares of common stock and to include the sale of their shares in registration statements covering our sale of shares to the public. See Description of our Capital StockRegistration Rights.
Stock options
Shortly after completion of this offering, we plan to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our stock option plan. As of February 7, 2000, options to purchase 1,820,919 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, 1,018,563 of which are vested. This registration statement is expected to be filed and become effective as soon as practicable after the date of this prospectus. Accordingly, shares registered under the S-8 registration statement will, subject to lock-up agreements, vesting provisions and Rule 144
87
Lock-up agreements
All of our officers and directors and other holders of all of our capital stock have agreed that they will not, without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers, offer, sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of any shares of our capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or any rights to acquire or purchase, any of our capital stock or publicly announce an intention to effect any of these transactions, for a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus.
Lehman Brothers currently has no plans to release any portion of the securities subject to lock-up agreements. When determining whether or not to release any portion of the securities subject to lock-up agreements, Lehman Brothers will consider, among other factors, the stockholders reasons for requesting the release, the number of shares for which the release is being requested and market conditions at the time.
88
UNDERWRITING
Under the underwriting agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement relating to this prospectus, the underwriters named below, for whom Lehman Brothers Inc., SG Cowen Securities Corporation, SoundView Technology Group, Inc. and Fidelity Capital Markets, a division of National Financial Services Corporation are acting as representatives, have each agreed to purchase from us the respective number of shares of common stock shown opposite its name below:
Number of | |||||
Underwriters | Shares | ||||
Lehman Brothers Inc. | |||||
SG Cowen Securities Corporation | |||||
SoundView Technology Group, Inc. | |||||
Fidelity Capital Markets, a division of National Financial Services Corporation | |||||
Total |
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters obligations to purchase shares of common stock depend on the satisfaction of the conditions contained in the underwriting agreement and that, if any of the shares of common stock are purchased by the underwriters under the underwriting agreement, all of the shares of common stock that the underwriters have agreed to purchase under the underwriting agreement, must be purchased. The conditions contained in the underwriting agreement include the requirement that the representations and warranties made by us to the underwriters are true, that there is no material change in the financial markets and that we deliver to the underwriters customary closing documents.
The representatives have advised us that the underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and to dealers, who may include the underwriters, at this public offering price less a selling concession not in excess of $ per share. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $ per share to brokers and dealers. After the offering, the underwriters may change the offering price and other selling terms.
We and the selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters an option to purchase up to an aggregate of additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts shown on the cover page of this prospectus. The underwriters may exercise this option at any time until 30 days after the date of the underwriting agreement. If this option is exercised, each underwriter will be committed, so long as the conditions of the underwriting agreement are satisfied, to purchase a number of additional shares of common stock proportionate to the underwriters initial commitment as indicated in the table above and we and the selling stockholders will be obligated, under the over-allotment option, to sell the shares of common stock to the underwriters.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed that, without the prior consent of Lehman Brothers, we will not, directly or indirectly, offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of
89
Fidelity Capital Markets, a division of National Financial Services Corporation, is acting as an underwriter in this offering, and will be facilitating electronic distribution of information through the Internet, Intranet and other proprietary electronic technology.
A prospectus in electronic format is being made available on the Internet web site maintained by Wit SoundViews affiliate, Wit Capital Corporation. In addition, other dealers purchasing shares from Wit SoundView in this offering have agreed to make a prospectus in electronic format available on web sites maintained by each of these dealers. Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on Wit Capitals web site and any information contained on any other web site maintained by Wit Capital is not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/ or endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter and should not be relied upon by investors.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representations or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the common stock. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters makes any representation that the representatives will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.
Any offers in Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus in the relevant province of Canada in which the sale is made.
Purchasers of the shares of common stock offered in this prospectus may be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges under the laws and practices of the country of purchase, in addition to the offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus.
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to confirm sales to accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority in excess of 5% of the shares of common stock offered by them.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to shares of the common stock offered by this prospectus for sale to our officers, directors, employees and their family members and to our business associates at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. These persons must commit to purchase no later than the close of business on the day following the date of this prospectus. The number of shares
90
In November 1999, we paid Lehman Brothers a fee of $1.4 million in connection with the private placement of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and also received 96,750 shares of our series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in lieu of partial cash payment of fees at a fair market value of $4.11 per share. In addition, in November 1999, affiliates of Lehman Brothers purchased an aggregate of 15,227 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock at a price of $4.11 per share and warrants to purchase 3,808 shares of series C redeemable convertible preferred stock with an exercise price of $4.11 per share. Upon the closing of the offering, all series C warrants shall become exercisable for common stock. All of the outstanding series C redeemable convertible preferred stock owned by Lehman Brothers and its affiliates will convert into the same number of shares our common stock upon the closing of the public offering.
91
VALIDITY OF THE SHARES
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP, Washington, DC, will pass upon the validity of the shares of common stock on our behalf. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP will pass upon legal matters for the underwriters.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sequoia Software Corporation at December 31, 1998 and 1999, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999 appearing in this prospectus and registration statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and registration statement, and are included in reliance upon the reports given upon the authority of Ernst & Young LLP as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of Radian Systems, Inc. at December 31, 1998, and for the year then ended, appearing in this prospectus and registration statement have been audited by Keller, Bruner & Company, LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and registration statement, and are included in reliance upon the report given upon the authority of Keller, Bruner & Company, LLP as experts in accounting and auditing.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement, including exhibits, schedules and amendments. This prospectus is a part of the registration statement and includes all of the information that we believe is material to an investor considering whether to make an investment in our common stock. We refer you to the registration statement for additional information about us, our common stock and this offering, including the full texts of the exhibits, some of which have been summarized in this prospectus. The registration statement is available for inspection and copying at the SECs Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a web site that contains the registration statement. The address of the SECs Internet site is http://www.sec.gov.
92
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page | ||||
Consolidated Financial Statements of Sequoia Software Corporation | ||||
Report of Independent Auditors | F-2 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1999 | F-3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 | F-5 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 | F-6 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 | F-7 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F-8 | |||
Financial Statements of Radian Systems, Inc. | ||||
Report of Independent Auditors | F-24 | |||
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1998 | F-25 | |||
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1998 | F-26 | |||
Statement of Stockholders Equity (Deficit) for the year ended December 31, 1998 | F-27 | |||
Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 1998 | F-28 | |||
Notes to Financial Statements | F-29 | |||
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1999 | P-1 | |||
Financial Statement Schedule | ||||
Report of Independent Auditors | S-1 | |||
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts | S-2 |
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sequoia Software Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Sequoia Software Corporation at December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Baltimore, Maryland
F-2
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, | Pro Forma | ||||||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||||||
1998 | 1999 | 1999 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited | |||||||||||||
Note 16) | |||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Current assets: | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,873,193 | $ | 10,902,585 | $ | 10,902,585 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $184,864 in 1999 | 418,260 | 4,135,698 | 4,135,698 | ||||||||||
Unbilled revenue | 1,783,665 | | | ||||||||||
Inventory | 621,144 | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 124,278 | 475,533 | 475,533 | ||||||||||
Total current assets | 4,820,540 | 15,523,816 | 15,523,816 | ||||||||||
Property and equipment: | |||||||||||||
Computer and office equipment | 540,592 | 1,272,017 | 1,272,017 | ||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures | 177,907 | 252,914 | 252,914 | ||||||||||
718,499 | 1,524,931 | 1,524,931 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (282,606 | ) | (522,238 | ) | (522,238 | ) | |||||||
435,893 | 1,002,693 | 1,002,693 | |||||||||||
Software development costs, net of accumulated amortization of $92,462 in 1998 and $345,529 in 1999 | 432,444 | 349,602 | 349,602 | ||||||||||
Intangible assets: | |||||||||||||
Goodwill | | 3,128,133 | 3,128,133 | ||||||||||
Covenants not to compete | | 2,280,400 | 2,280,400 | ||||||||||
| 5,408,533 | 5,408,533 | |||||||||||
Accumulated amortization | | (635,872 | ) | (635,872 | ) | ||||||||
| 4,772,661 | 4,772,661 | |||||||||||
Other assets | | 634,000 | 634,000 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 5,688,877 | $ | 22,282,772 | $ | 22,282,772 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-3
December 31, | Pro Forma | ||||||||||||
December 31, | |||||||||||||
1998 | 1999 | 1999 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited | |||||||||||||
Note 16) | |||||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) | |||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 862,034 | $ | 1,971,649 | $ | 1,971,649 | |||||||
Accrued compensation and related costs | 39,757 | 384,050 | 384,050 | ||||||||||
Deferred revenue | 26,720 | 1,196,970 | 1,196,970 | ||||||||||
Borrowings under revolving promissory note | | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 83,977 | 316,802 | 316,802 | ||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 1,012,488 | 4,869,471 | 4,869,471 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 76,521 | 473,592 | 473,592 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,089,009 | 5,343,063 | 5,343,063 | ||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | | | | ||||||||||
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 8,064,877 shares authorized, 2,016,221 issued and outstanding in 1998 and 1999 (none pro forma); aggregate liquidation preference of $2,351,123 in 1998 and $2,511,123 in 1999 | 5,454,360 | 8,065,000 | | ||||||||||
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 9,647,920 shares authorized, 2,411,984 issued and outstanding in 1998 and 1999 (none pro forma); aggregate liquidation preference of $6,706,447 in 1998 and $7,228,438 in 1999 | 6,706,447 | 9,647,920 | | ||||||||||
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, 26,092,770 shares authorized, 6,210,258 shares issued and outstanding in 1999 (none pro forma); aggregate liquidation preference of $25,765,854 in 1999 | | 25,765,854 | | ||||||||||
Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value, 6,817,239 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding actual and pro forma | | | | ||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit): | |||||||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 75,714,665 shares authorized; 2,553,032 and 3,960,532 shares issued and outstanding in 1998 and 1999, respectively (14,598,995 shares pro forma) | 2,553 | 3,961 | 14,599 | ||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | | | 43,468,136 | ||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (7,564,427 | ) | (26,557,282 | ) | (26,557,282 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 935 | 14,256 | 14,256 | ||||||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) | (7,560,939 | ) | (26,539,065 | ) | 16,939,709 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) | $ | 5,688,877 | $ | 22,282,772 | $ | 22,282,772 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-4
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||
Licenses | $ | 422,176 | $ | 574,948 | $ | 4,331,804 | |||||||
Services and maintenance | 2,816,494 | 2,422,811 | 3,346,589 | ||||||||||
Hardware | 437,791 | 1,013,684 | 719,295 | ||||||||||
3,676,461 | 4,011,443 | 8,397,688 | |||||||||||
Cost of sales: | |||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 172,540 | 173,234 | 2,408,802 | ||||||||||
Cost of services and maintenance | 1,331,829 | 1,881,670 | 2,748,841 | ||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 320,613 | 761,972 | 922,007 | ||||||||||
1,824,982 | 2,816,876 | 6,079,650 | |||||||||||
Gross profit | 1,851,479 | 1,194,567 | 2,318,038 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||
Research and development | 544,978 | 991,004 | 3,635,114 | ||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 1,186,994 | 2,256,938 | 6,826,432 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 641,741 | 805,923 | 3,506,277 | ||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 5,646 | 18,898 | 651,031 | ||||||||||
2,379,359 | 4,072,763 | 14,618,854 | |||||||||||
Loss from operations | (527,880 | ) | (2,878,196 | ) | (12,300,816 | ) | |||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | (39,292 | ) | (84,469 | ) | (508,106 | ) | |||||||
Other income, net | 18,977 | 5,126 | 16,838 | ||||||||||
Net loss | (548,195 | ) | (2,957,539 | ) | (12,792,084 | ) | |||||||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | (191,123 | ) | (3,263,237 | ) | (2,610,640 | ) | |||||||
Accretion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | (306,114 | ) | (2,956,965 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | (2,945,974 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (739,318 | ) | $ | (6,526,890 | ) | $ | (21,305,663 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (2.57 | ) | $ | (6.54 | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes.
F-5
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||
of Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 1997 | 2,537,407 | $ | 2,537 | $ | | $ | (299,765 | ) | $ | | $ | (297,228 | ) | |||||||||||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | | (191,123 | ) | | (191,123 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss for 1997 | | | | (548,195 | ) | | (548,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1997 | 2,537,407 | 2,537 | | (1,039,083 | ) | | (1,036,546 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash upon exercise of stock options | 15,625 | 16 | 1,546 | | | 1,562 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | (1,546 | ) | (3,261,691 | ) | | (3,263,237 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | | (306,114 | ) | | (306,114 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss for 1998 | | | | (2,957,539 | ) | (2,957,539 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive incomeforeign currency translation adjustment | | | | | 935 | 935 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | (2,956,604 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1998 | 2,553,032 | 2,553 | | (7,564,427 | ) | 935 | (7,560,939 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of Radian Systems, Inc. | 1,400,000 | 1,400 | 1,377,440 | | | 1,378,840 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock for cash upon exercise of stock options | 7,500 | 8 | 461 | | | 469 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of warrants to purchase 222,301 shares of common stock and 1,704,310 shares of Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock in connection with issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock | | | 736,817 | | | 736,817 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of options to employees | | | 198,090 | | | 198,090 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | (2,312,808 | ) | (297,832 | ) | | (2,610,640 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | | (2,956,965 | ) | | (2,956,965 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Accretion of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | | | | (2,945,974 | ) | | (2,945,974 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss for 1999 | | | | (12,792,084 | ) | (12,792,084 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive incomeforeign currency translation adjustment | | | | | 13,321 | 13,321 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | (12,778,763 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1999 | 3,960,532 | $ | 3,961 | $ | | $ | (26,557,282 | ) | $ | 14,256 | $ | (26,539,065 | ) | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-6
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (548,195 | ) | $ | (2,957,539 | ) | $ | (12,792,084 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 96,780 | 128,668 | 317,009 | |||||||||||
Amortization of software development costs | | 92,462 | 133,067 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | | | 635,872 | |||||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets | 20,491 | | | |||||||||||
Non-cash sale of software licenses | | | (634,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-cash compensation expense | | | 198,090 | |||||||||||
Non-cash interest expense | | 24,889 | 150,200 | |||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | (431,824 | ) | 162,371 | (2,290,217 | ) | |||||||||
Unbilled revenue | (776,858 | ) | (943,407 | ) | 1,783,665 | |||||||||
Income tax receivable | 9,800 | | | |||||||||||
Inventory | (44,529 | ) | (575,985 | ) | 611,144 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (38,360 | ) | (64,413 | ) | (115,185 | ) | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 360,675 | 265,871 | (7,083 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued compensation and related costs | 152,359 | (226,829 | ) | 82,658 | ||||||||||
Deferred revenue | (190 | ) | 26,720 | 840,149 | ||||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (1,199,851 | ) | (4,067,192 | ) | (11,086,715 | ) | ||||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||||
Cash acquired upon acquisition of Radian Systems, Inc. | | | 203,336 | |||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (197,071 | ) | (294,880 | ) | (848,141 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment | 69,367 | | | |||||||||||
Capitalized software development costs | (424,913 | ) | (99,993 | ) | | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (552,617 | ) | (394,873 | ) | (644,805 | ) | ||||||||
Financing activities | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings under long-term debt arrangements | 500,000 | 584,159 | 624,984 | |||||||||||
Payments under long-term debt arrangements | (248,955 | ) | (969,859 | ) | (619,397 | ) | ||||||||
Payments of notes payable | | | (3,500,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings under revolving promissory note | | | 1,000,000 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises | | 1,562 | 469 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible demand promissory notes payable, subsequently converted to Series B preferred stock | | 1,000,000 | | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred stock, net of offering expenses | | 5,375,444 | (15,492 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of convertible demand promissory notes payable, subsequently converted to Series C preferred stock | | | 5,000,000 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Series C preferred stock, including attached warrants, net of offering expenses | | | 18,257,027 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 251,045 | 5,991,306 | 20,747,591 | |||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | | 935 | 13,321 | |||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (1,501,423 | ) | 1,530,176 | 9,029,392 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 1,844,440 | 343,017 | 1,873,193 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 343,017 | $ | 1,873,193 | $ | 10,902,585 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-7
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1999
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Sequoia Software Corporation (the Company) is a provider of portal software solutions that harness Internet technology for e-business applications. The Companys principal product, Sequoia XML Portal Server (XPS) introduced in March 1999, is a portal software solution utilizing eXtensible Markup Language technology (XML). XPS enables users to interact with information originating from multiple applications. The Company also provides software engineering services in conjunction with the license and installation of back office and document management software products. The Companys customers are in various industries and are principally located throughout the United States.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany accounts and transactions.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Accounts receivable at December 31, 1999 includes $1.0 million due from one customer under a subcontract arrangement. The Company performed software modification, customization and related services under their subcontract in 1997, 1998 and 1999. At December 31, 1999, the amount owed to the Company is past due as a result of a dispute between the general contractor and the general contractors customer that has not currently allowed the general contractor to collect certain fees billed. The Company is not a party to the dispute, and expects that it will collect the amount owed in 2000. However, due to uncertainties surrounding the resolution of the dispute and the resultant effect on the general contractors ability to meet its obligations, it is reasonably possible that managements estimate of the recoverability of this account receivable may change in the near term.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
F-8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Inventory
Inventory consists principally of transferable software licenses purchased from third-parties and integrated into software products sold or licensed to the Companys customers. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market value.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of between three and seven years. Assets held under capital leases are stated at the lesser of the present value of future minimum payments using the Companys incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the lease or the fair value of the property at the inception of the lease. The assets recorded under capital leases are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the assets in a manner consistent with the Companys depreciation policy for owned assets. Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense.
Software Development Costs
Costs for the development of new software products and substantial enhancements to existing software products are expensed as research and development costs as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time any additional development costs are capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. The Company defines the establishment of technological feasibility as the completion of a working model of the software product that has been tested to be consistent with the product design specifications.
Amortization of software development costs begins upon general release of the software. These costs are amortized over their estimated useful life of four years. Amortization expense is included in cost of software licenses.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives revenue from software licenses, maintenance (postcontract customer support) and services. In addition, the Company for the convenience of its customers has sold hardware purchased from third parties. Software licenses for the Companys off-the-shelf software typically contain multiple elements, including the product license, maintenance, and/or other services. The Company allocates the total arrangement fee among each deliverable based on the relative fair value of each of the deliverables determined based on vendor-specific objective evidence.
Licenses
License fees include fees from the sale of third party software and software developed and licensed by the Company. Certain software developed by the Company is licensed under
F-9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
contractual arrangements that, in addition to the delivery of software, require significant modification and customization of software. These arrangements are accounted for using the percentage of completion method, with progress to completion measured based on labor costs incurred.
Off-the-shelf software and third party software sold by the Company is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, and the fee is fixed or determinable and probable of collection. The Companys normal payment terms require payment within 90-days. The Company considers all arrangements with payments terms extending beyond 90-days not to have fees that are fixed or determinable.
Software license fees billed and not recognized as revenue are included in deferred revenue.
Services and Maintenance
Services include installation, basic consulting, as well as software customization and modification to meet specific customer needs. Professional service fees that are provided under long-term contracts to install and customize software developed by the Company or third parties is recognized using the percentage of completion method. Progress to completion is measured using costs incurred compared to estimated total costs, or contract milestones.
Maintenance fees include telephone support, bug fixes, and rights to upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis associated with software licenses. These fees are collected in advance and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. Unrecognized maintenance fees are included in deferred revenue.
Hardware
The Company sells hardware purchased from third parties. These revenues are recognized when the hardware is shipped.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
The Company amortizes goodwill on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of five years. The Company amortizes covenants not to compete on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreements, which are three or four years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, the Company evaluates whether an impairment exists on the basis of undiscounted expected future cash flows from operations for the remaining amortization period. If an impairment exists, the asset is reduced by the estimated shortfall of discounted cash flows.
F-10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Advertising Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense totaled approximately $10,000, $111,000, and $629,000 in 1997, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Stock Options Granted to Employees
The Company accounts for all stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). Under APB 25, if the exercise price of the employee stock options equals the estimated fair value of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is generally recognized.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (Statement 123) which encourages companies to recognize expense for stock-based awards based on their estimated fair value on the date of grant. Statement 123 does not require companies to use fair value accounting for stock-based awards, but if the fair value method is not adopted, pro forma income is required to be disclosed in a note to the financial statements. The Company has determined that the pro forma compensation has an immaterial effect on the reported net loss in 1997, 1998 and 1999 and no effect on the reported loss per share in those years.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Companys Irish subsidiary utilizes the Irish punt as its functional currency and the financial statements of this subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars using the current rate method. All balance sheet accounts are translated using the exchange rates at the balance sheet date. Operating and cash flow amounts have been translated using average exchange rates. Translation gains or losses, resulting from the changes in exchange rates from year to year, are reported as a component of other comprehensive income.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events of a period other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Certain non-owner changes in equity, consisting of foreign currency translation adjustments, are included in other comprehensive income. The Company reports
F-11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders equity and discloses the accumulated total of other comprehensive income in the stockholders equity section of the balance sheet.
Operating Segments
The Companys chief operating decision maker reviews the operations of the Company on a consolidated basis in order to assess performance and make operating decisions. In addition, the Companys software products consist principally of XML-based products that are similar. Accordingly, the Company currently does not have any reportable segments.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the 1997 and 1998 financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 1999 presentation.
2. Acquisition of Radian Systems, Inc.
On July 1, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Radian Systems, Inc. (Radian), a provider of software development and information systems integration services to corporations, government agencies and other institutions throughout the United States. The purchase price consisted of 1,400,000 shares of common stock valued in an independent appraisal at $1,400,000 and promissory notes of $3,500,000. The Company also incurred direct acquisition costs of $50,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting, and the results of operations of Radian are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the period from July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999.
The total purchase price of $4,950,000 was allocated as follows:
Current assets | $1,825,000 | |
Fixed assets | 128,000 | |
Liabilities assumed | (2,411,000) | |
Goodwill | 3,128,000 | |
Covenants not to compete | 2,280,000 | |
$4,950,000 | ||
In November 1999, the Company repaid the $3,500,000 of promissory notes issued in connection with the acquisition, including accrued interest of $117,000.
The following summarizes the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations for 1998 and 1999 assuming the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each year. These results
F-12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
are not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred had this transaction been consummated as of the beginning of the year presented, or of future operations of the Company:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
1998 | 1999 | |||||||
Revenue | $ | 9,638,510 | $ | 11,717,026 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (5,138,908 | ) | $ | (14,046,874 | ) | ||
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (8,708,259 | ) | $ | (22,560,453 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders | $ | (2.78 | ) | $ | (5.71 | ) |
3. Loss Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per common share for the years ended December 31:
Historical:
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (548,195 | ) | $ | (2,957,539 | ) | $ | (12,792,084 | ) | |||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to fair value | (191,123 | ) | (3,263,237 | ) | (2,610,640 | ) | ||||||
Accretion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to fair value | | (306,114 | ) | (2,956,965 | ) | |||||||
Accretion of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to fair value | | | (2,945,974 | ) | ||||||||
$ | (739,318 | ) | $ | (6,526,890 | ) | $ | (21,305,663 | ) | ||||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding | 2,537,404 | 2,538,594 | 3,260,026 | |||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (2.57 | ) | $ | (6.54 | ) | |||
Basic loss per share is based upon the average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is equal to basic loss per common share because if potentially dilutive securities were included in the computation, the result would be anti-dilutive. These potentially dilutive securities consist of convertible preferred stocks, stock options and warrants.
F-13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Supplemental Pro Forma:
Supplemental pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share in 1999 is presented to disclose the effect on loss per share of the assumed conversion of securities which will convert into common stock upon the closing of the proposed initial public offering. For purposes of the pro forma computation, the convertible securities are assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the year, or if later, the issuance dates.
Numerator: | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (12,792,084 | ) | |||
Denominator: | ||||||
Shares used in historical calculation | 3,260,026 | |||||
Add: | ||||||
Pro forma conversion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock | 2,016,221 | |||||
Pro forma conversion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock | 2,411,984 | |||||
Pro forma conversion of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock | 646,547 | |||||
Denominator for pro forma loss per share | 8,334,778 | |||||
Supplemental pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share | $ | (1.53 | ) | |||
4. Effect of Change in Estimate
In 1997, the Company entered into a $3.8 million contract with a customer to provide software customization and licensing. Revenue for this contract was recognized under the percentage-of-completion method, as described in Note 1. As of December 31, 1997, this contract was determined to be 30% complete.
During 1998, as contract performance progressed, the Company incurred unanticipated direct labor budget overruns under the contract. These overruns were caused principally by the inherent subjectivity of the original estimates of efforts required to complete the specified functionality as defined in the contract, and employee turnover. As of December 31, 1998 the contract was nearing completion, and the Company revised its estimates to complete the contract. The revised estimates indicated that as of December 31, 1997 the contract was actually 17% complete. Had the Company recognized revenue under the contract using the updated estimates of actual costs to be incurred during the period of contract performance, the reported net loss in 1997 would have been approximately $500,000 higher, and the net loss in 1998 would have been approximately $500,000 lower. This change in estimate had a $0.20 per share effect on loss per share in 1997 and 1998.
F-14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
5. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: | ||||||||||||
Conversion of notes payable and accrued interest to Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock | $ | | $ | 1,024,889 | $ | | ||||||
Conversion of notes payable and accrued interest to Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock | | | 5,149,470 | |||||||||
Issuance of 96,750 shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock as compensation to investment adviser in connection with financing | | | 387,000 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition of Radian Systems, Inc. | | | 1,400,000 | |||||||||
Other cash flow information: | ||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | 38,887 | 86,278 | 184,223 |
6. Income Taxes
The significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 are as follows:
1998 | 1999 | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||
Net operating loss carryforward | $ | 1,620,946 | $ | 6,011,955 | |||||
Stock compensation expense | | 76,502 | |||||||
Covenants not to compete | | 95,414 | |||||||
Provision for bad debts | | 71,394 | |||||||
Total deferred tax assets | 1,620,946 | 6,255,265 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||
Depreciation | 14,022 | 2,820 | |||||||
Software development costs | 172,978 | 87,707 | |||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 187,000 | 90,527 | |||||||
Net future income tax benefit | 1,433,946 | 6,164,738 | |||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred assets | (1,433,946 | ) | (6,164,738 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | | $ | | |||||
The Company has reported losses since inception. These losses have not resulted in reported tax benefits because of increases in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets that result from the inability to determine the realizability of the net operating loss carryforwards.
At December 31, 1999, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $15,567,000, which expire from 2011 to 2019 and are available to offset future taxable income. The Companys taxable income from its Irish subsidiary was insignificant. Income tax regulations
F-15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
contain provisions that will limit the net operating loss carryforwards available to be used in any given year.
The reconciliation of the reported income tax expense to the amount that would result by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to net loss is as follows:
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||
Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate | $ | (186,386 | ) | $ | (1,005,563 | ) | $ | (4,349,308 | ) | |||
Effect of permanent differences | 14,084 | 5,374 | 130,978 | |||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | (25,327 | ) | (136,638 | ) | (512,462 | ) | ||||||
Increase in valuation allowance | 197,629 | 1,136,827 | 4,730,792 | |||||||||
Total | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
7. Borrowings Under Revolving Promissory Note
On March 26, 1999, the Company issued a $1,000,000 revolving promissory note to a bank. Interest on borrowings under the revolving promissory note accrue at the prime rate plus 0.75% per annum (9.25% at December 31, 1999), and is payable monthly. The unpaid principal plus accrued interest is due in full on March 25, 2000. Borrowings under the revolving promissory note are secured by all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. At December 31, 1999, borrowings outstanding under this note totaled $1,000,000.
In connection with this revolving promissory note, the Company is required to comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants and is restricted from paying dividends. At December 31, 1999, the Company was in compliance with the covenants.
8. Long-Term Debt
On May 14, 1997, the Company entered into a $500,000 loan facility with a bank that provided for revolving working capital borrowings and long-term equipment borrowings. All borrowings under this facility accrue interest at the prime rate plus 1.5% per annum (10.00% at December 31, 1999) and are secured by a first lien on all corporate assets. Borrowings for working capital purposes were repaid on November 14, 1998. Borrowings to finance equipment purchases are repayable over 36 months, beginning January 1998, with monthly payments of $5,916 plus accrued interest. At December 31, 1999, borrowings outstanding under this facility totaled $65,077.
On March 26, 1999, the Company entered into a $750,000 equipment term note with a bank. Borrowings under the equipment term note accrue interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% (9.75% at December 31, 1999), payable monthly, and are secured by all tangible and intangible corporate assets. Borrowings to finance equipment purchases can continue until March 5, 2000 and are repayable over 36 months, beginning March 5, 2000, with monthly payments of fixed principal plus interest. The unpaid principal plus accrued interest is due in full on February 5,
F-16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
2003. At December 31, 1999, borrowings outstanding under the equipment term note totaled $624,984.
The Company has also incurred other indebtedness related to the acquisition of certain office and computer equipment. Amounts due under these agreements bear interest at rates ranging from 8% to 12% and are due through March 2001.
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for the years ending December 31 are as follows:
2000 | $316,802 | |
2001 | 230,543 | |
2002 | 208,328 | |
2003 | 34,721 | |
$790,394 | ||
9. Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Warrants
On October 21, 1996, the Company issued 2,016,221 shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series A). Each share of the Series A accrues dividends at an annual rate of 8% of liquidation value of $0.99 per share. Dividends in arrears on the Series A were $351,123 and $511,123 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
In 1998, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to authorize the issuance of 9,647,920 shares of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series B). On July 28, 1998 and September 28, 1998, the Company issued 1,303,005 and 1,108,979 shares of Series B, respectively. Each share of the Series B accrues dividends at an annual rate of 8% of liquidation value of $2.71 per share. Dividends in arrears on the Series B were $181,558 and $703,549 at December 31, 1998 and 1999, respectively.
In 1999, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to authorize the issuance of 26,092,770 shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series C) and 6,817,239 shares of Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series D). On November 23, 1999, the Company issued 6,210,258 shares of Series C, together with attached nontransferable warrants to purchase 1,704,311 shares of Series D and attached nontransferable warrants to purchase 222,303 shares of common stock. Each share of the Series C accrues dividends at an annual rate of 8% of liquidation value of $4.11 per share. Dividends in arrears on the Series C were $218,378 at December 31, 1999.
The stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the Series C expire two years after their date of issuance or upon the closing of a qualifying underwritten public offering as defined in the articles of amendment and restatement to the Companys articles of incorporation. The exercise price for the Series D and common stock warrants is $4.50 per share. The number of shares or exercise price will be adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock splits or
F-17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
recapitalization of the Company. Both the Series D and common stock warrants were valued using a generally accepted warrant valuation methodology. The estimated value of the Series D warrants of $613,550 and the estimated value of the common stock warrants of $115,600 has been recorded as additional paid-in capital. The Series C has therefore been recorded net of a discount of $729,150.
Also during 1999, the Company issued warrants to purchase 312,952 shares of Series C in connection with the issuance of $5,000,000 of convertible notes payable which were subsequently converted into Series C. The exercise price of the warrants is $4.11 per share, and they expire two years after their date of issuance or upon the closing of a qualifying underwritten public offering. The number of shares or exercise price will be adjusted in the event of any stock dividend, stock splits or recapitalization of the Company. The Series C warrants were valued using a generally accepted warrant valuation methodology, and the estimated value of $150,200 has been recorded as Series C.
The dividends on the Series A, B and C are cumulative and are payable out of the Companys positive earnings as directed by the Board of Directors, upon the liquidation or winding up of the Company, or upon the redemption of the preferred stock.
The Series A, B and C are redeemable, at the option of the holders, at anytime after November 2004, for the greater of (a) the liquidation value or (b) the amount determined to be the fair market value at the time of redemption. In addition, the Series A, B and C are convertible at any time into common stock, with the ratio of common stock to preferred stock at the date of conversion to be determined as outlined in the amended and restated articles of incorporation. The conversion rate at December 31, 1999 for the Series A, B and C was equal to the respective liquidation value per share. Upon the closing of a qualifying underwritten public offering, the Series A, B and C will be automatically converted into common stock. Cumulative undeclared dividends are forfeited upon conversion.
Each share of the Series A, B and C has substantially the same voting rights as the number of shares of common stock into which it can be converted, as provided in the amended and restated articles of incorporation. The holders of the Series A together with the holders of the Series B can independently appoint one director to the Board of Directors. The holders of the Series C in aggregate can independently appoint three directors to the Board of Directors.
As a result of the mandatory redemption feature outside the control of the Company contained in each series of preferred stock, each preferred stock issuance has been excluded from stockholders equity (deficit) in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company records periodic accretion for the excess of the estimated redemption value over the carrying value through charges to additional paid-in capital or accumulated deficit. In determining the estimated mandatory redemption value, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of each series of preferred stock. To estimate these values, the Company considered the value of similar securities issued near each balance sheet date, and any intervening events that may have changed these
F-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
values. At December 31, 1999, the Series A and B are stated at their estimated fair value of $4.00 per share, or the per share value of the Series C issued in November 1999 that had identical terms. The Series C at December 31, 1999 is stated at its liquidation preference of $25,765,854, which is a value greater than its issuance amount in November 1999 due to the accrual of cumulative unpaid dividends.
The activity in the Series A, B, and C for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 is as follows (amounts in thousands):
Series A | Series B | Series C | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 1997 | 2,016 | $ | 2,000 | | $ | | | $ | | |||||||||||||||
Accretion to estimated mandatory redemption value | | 191 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1997 | 2,016 | 2,191 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible notes payable to Series B | | | 379 | 1,025 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series B, net of issuance costs of $125 | | | 2,033 | 5,375 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion to estimated mandatory redemption value | | 3,263 | | 306 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1998 | 2,016 | 5,454 | 2,412 | 6,706 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional issuance costs of Series B | | | | (15 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of warrants to purchase Series C in connection with convertible notes payable | | | | | | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of convertible notes payable to Series C | | | | | 1,252 | 5,150 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series C, net of issuance costs of $2,138 | | | | | 4,958 | 18,249 | ||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of warrants to purchase common stock and Series D in connection with issuance of Series C | | | | | | (729 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Accretion to estimated mandatory redemption value | | 2,611 | | 2,957 | | 2,946 | ||||||||||||||||||
2,016 | $ | 8,065 | 2,412 | $ | 9,648 | 6,210 | $ | 25,766 | ||||||||||||||||
F-19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
10. Shares Reserved for Future Issuance
As of December 31, 1999, the Company has reserved shares of common stock for issuance as follows:
Conversion of Series A | 2,016,221 | |||
Conversion of Series B | 2,411,984 | |||
Conversion of Series C | 6,210,258 | |||
Exercise of Series C warrants and conversion of Series C shares to common stock | 312,952 | |||
Exercise of Series D warrants and conversion of Series D shares to common stock | 1,704,311 | |||
Exercise of outstanding common stock warrants | 222,303 | |||
Exercise of outstanding stock options | 1,647,669 | |||
Stock options available for granting as reserved by the Board of Directors | 390,286 | |||
14,915,984 | ||||
11. Stock Options
The Board of Directors has authorized the grant of non-qualified options to purchase up to 2,039,205 shares of common stock. A summary of stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31 follows:
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Options | Price | Options | Price | Options | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstandingbeginning of year | 776,250 | $ | 0.044 | 890,000 | $ | 0.051 | 1,009,250 | $ | 0.069 | |||||||||||||||
Granted | 113,750 | 0.100 | 166,750 | 0.176 | 743,457 | 1.461 | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercised | | | (15,625 | ) | 0.100 | (7,500 | ) | 0.060 | ||||||||||||||||
Forfeited | | | (31,875 | ) | 0.100 | (97,538 | ) | 0.268 | ||||||||||||||||
Outstandingend of year | 890,000 | $ | 0.051 | 1,009,250 | $ | 0.069 | 1,647,669 | $ | 0.685 | |||||||||||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 372,500 | $ | 0.040 | 579,375 | $ | 0.044 | 1,006,063 | $ | 0.348 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year: | $ | 0.040 | $ | 0.057 | $ | 1.136 | ||||||||||||||||||
All options granted to date are exercisable at, or below the estimated fair value of the Companys common stock at the date of grant, and are subject to vesting provisions, as determined by the Board of Directors. Options granted to date vest in varying percentages through 2004. In estimating the fair value of the Companys common stock at the grant date, the Board of Directors considered either independent appraisals of the value of the common stock or significant transactions with investors in the Company.
F-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
All options granted during 1999 were granted with exercise prices that were below the estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, the Company has recorded compensation expense of $198,090 for the year ended December 31, 1999, and will record an additional $424,500 of compensation expense through 2004.
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 1999 ranged from $0.04 to $2.80 as follows:
Weighted | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual Life | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prices of | of | Exercise Prices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Outstanding | Outstanding | Outstanding | Exercisable | of Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Options | Options | Options | Options | Options | |||||||||||||||||
$0.04 $0.10 | 885,313 | $ | 0.052 | 80.8 months | 808,750 | $ | 0.048 | |||||||||||||||
$0.28 $0.52 | 456,150 | 0.490 | 111.0 months | 103,563 | 0.487 | |||||||||||||||||
$2.80 | 306,206 | 2.800 | 119.0 months | 93,750 | 2.800 |
12. Leases
The Company leases its office space in Columbia, Maryland under a non-cancelable operating lease agreement that expires in September 2002. The Company also leases certain equipment and vehicles under non-cancelable operating lease agreements expiring between May 2000 and February 2003.
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consisted of the following at December 31, 1999:
2000 | $ | 493,366 | ||
2001 | 499,036 | |||
2002 | 322,532 | |||
2003 | 10,869 | |||
$ | 1,325,803 | |||
Rent expense under all operating leases for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 was $135,054, $292,801 and $394,687, respectively.
13. Significant Customers and Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral.
F-21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
For the years ended December 31, the percentage of revenue from significant customers was as follows:
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||
Customer A | 75 | % | 56 | % | | |||||||
Customer B | | 27 | % | | ||||||||
Customer C | 14 | % | | | ||||||||
Customer D | | | 24 | % | ||||||||
Customer E | | | 12 | % |
As of December 31, the percentage of accounts receivable from significant customers was as follows:
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | ||||||||||
Customer A | 72 | % | 80 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Customer B | 15 | % | 5 | % | | |||||||
Customer C | 12 | % | 10 | % | | |||||||
Customer D | | | 17 | % | ||||||||
Customer E | | | 14 | % | ||||||||
Customer F | | | 13 | % |
As discussed more fully in Note 1, Use of Estimates, accounts receivable from Customer A at December 31, 1999 are past due and estimates of recoverability may change in the near term.
14. Employee Benefit Plan
Effective April 1, 1998, the Company established the Sequoia Software Corporation Employee Savings and Retirement Plan (the Plan), which is eligible to all employees who are at least twenty-one years old. Under the Plan agreement, participants may elect to defer annually up to 20% of their salary, not to exceed $10,000. In addition, the Company may make a discretionary matching contribution of up to 6% of compensation, based on each eligible participants elective deferrals. Participant contributions and employer contributions vest immediately. The Company elected not to make any contributions to the Plan for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999.
15. Subsequent Events
On February 7, 2000, the Board of Directors declared a 1-for-4 stock split. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the reverse split.
During January and February 2000, the Company granted non-qualified options to purchase 416,375 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share, which is lower than the
F-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
estimated fair value of the common stock on the date of grant of $9.60 per share. Accordingly, the Company will record approximately $2.9 million of compensation expense over the vesting period of up to five years.
16. Pro Forma Balance Sheet (Unaudited)
In February 2000, the Board of Directors approved the filing of a registration statement for the sale of common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission that, upon closing, would meet the criteria for the automatic conversion of the outstanding Series A, Series B and Series C.
The following table summarizes the pro forma adjustments to the pro forma balance sheet to reflect the automatic conversion of the preferred stocks (in thousands):
Historical | Pro Forma | |||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
1999 | Adjustments | 1999 | ||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,903 | $ | | $ | 10,903 | ||||||||
Other current assets | 4,621 | | 4,621 | |||||||||||
Total current assets | 15,524 | | 15,524 | |||||||||||
Property and equipment, net | 1,003 | | 1,003 | |||||||||||
Other assets | 5,756 | | 5,756 | |||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 22,283 | $ | | $ | 22,283 | ||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) | ||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 1,972 | $ | | $ | 1,972 | ||||||||
Other current liabilities | 2,897 | | 2,897 | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 4,869 | | 4,869 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt | 474 | | 474 | |||||||||||
Series A | 8,065 | (8,065 | ) | | ||||||||||
Series B | 9,648 | (9,648 | ) | | ||||||||||
Series C | 25,766 | (25,766 | ) | | ||||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit): | ||||||||||||||
Common stock | 4 | 11 | 15 | |||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | | 43,468 | 43,468 | |||||||||||
Accumulated deficit | (26,557 | ) | | (26,557 | ) | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 14 | | 14 | |||||||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) | (26,539 | ) | 43,479 | 16,940 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) | $ | 22,283 | $ | | $ | 22,283 | ||||||||
F-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
To the Board of Directors
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Radian Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statement are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Radian Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KELLER, BRUNER & COMPANY, LLP |
Bethesda, Maryland
F-24
RADIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, | ||||||
1998 | ||||||
Assets | ||||||
Current Assets | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 549,359 | ||||
Accounts receivable | 937,075 | |||||
Other receivables | 3,222 | |||||
Due from parent | 496,251 | |||||
Prepaid and other | 29,238 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 34,000 | |||||
Total current assets | 2,049,145 | |||||
Deposits | 6,396 | |||||
Property and Equipment | ||||||
Office furniture and equipment | 290,043 | |||||
Leasehold improvements | 3,819 | |||||
293,862 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | 132,340 | |||||
Total property and equipment | 161,522 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,217,063 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity | ||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||
Current portion of capital lease obligation | $ | 66,518 | ||||
Accounts payable | 1,237,190 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 186,393 | |||||
Deferred income | 80,489 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 1,570,590 | |||||
Long-Term Liabilities | ||||||
Due to parent | 502,088 | |||||
Capital lease obligation, less current maturities | 74,006 | |||||
Total long-term liabilities | 576,094 | |||||
Commitments and Contingencies | ||||||
Stockholders Equity | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 75,000 shares authorized, 50,000 issued and outstanding | 500 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 699,500 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (629,621 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity | 70,379 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity | $ | 2,217,063 | ||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-25
RADIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year ended | |||||
December 31, 1998 | |||||
Contract revenue | $ | 5,627,067 | |||
Direct costs | 3,228,424 | ||||
Gross profit | 2,398,643 | ||||
Operating expense | 3,332,233 | ||||
Operating loss | (933,590 | ) | |||
Other income (expenses): | |||||
Interest expense | (66,904 | ) | |||
Loss before income tax benefit | (1,000,494 | ) | |||
Income tax benefit | 370,873 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (629,621 | ) | ||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-26
RADIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Paid-In | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
of Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon recapitalization and incorporation | 75,000 | $ | 500 | $ | 699,500 | $ | | $ | 700,000 | |||||||||||
Net loss | | | | (629,621 | ) | (629,621 | ) | |||||||||||||
75,000 | $ | 500 | $ | 699,500 | $ | (629,621 | ) | $ | 70,379 | |||||||||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-27
RADIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended | |||||||
December 31, 1998 | |||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (629,621 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 76,857 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | (34,000 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
(Increase) decrease in: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | 1,538,016 | ||||||
Other receivables | 4,248 | ||||||
Due from parent | (426,883 | ) | |||||
Prepaid and other | 78,236 | ||||||
Inventory | 131,354 | ||||||
Deposits | (6,396 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in: | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 206,478 | ||||||
Deferred income | (308,678 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 629,611 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | |||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligation | (80,754 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (80,754 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 548,857 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: | |||||||
Beginning | 502 | ||||||
Ending | $ | 549,359 | |||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | |||||||
Cash payments (net of refunds) for interest | $ | 12,302 | |||||
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities | |||||||
Acquisition of equipment under capital lease obligation | $ | 200,000 | |||||
Investment by parent in common stock and additional paid-in capital | $ | 700,000 | |||||
See Notes to Financial Statements.
F-28
RADIAN SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of business: Radian Systems, Inc. (the Company) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Radian Inc. (the Parent). The Company was incorporated in October 1997, and was spun-off as a separate corporation January 1, 1998. Prior to 1998, the Company operated as a division of the Parent. The Company is involved in providing software development and information systems integration services. The Company operates primarily in Virginia.
A summary of the Companys significant accounting policies is as follows:
Basis of accounting: The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying statement of operations includes all costs of the Parent attributable to the Companys operations and the allocable share of other corporate costs. Corporate general and administrative expenses are allocated based on the ratio of the Companys total costs excluding general and administrative expenses to total consolidated costs excluding general and administrative expenses.
Revenue recognition: The Company derives revenue principally under long-term contracts that, in addition to the delivery of software, require significant modification and customization of software and the performance of related services. Revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion method. Progress to completion is measured using costs incurred compared to estimated total costs.
Cash and cash equivalents: For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company includes all cash accounts which are not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties as cash and cash equivalents.
Provision for doubtful accounts: The provision for doubtful accounts is based on managements evaluation of the status of existing accounts receivable. Management believes that accounts receivable are fully collectible and no provision for doubtful accounts is necessary.
Property and equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed on accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Income taxes: Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method, whereby, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. As those differences reverse, they will enter into the determination of future taxable income included in the consolidated tax returns. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
F-29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.
Note 2. Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 1998, and accumulated depreciation and amortization as of December 31, 1998 consists of the following:
Accumulated | ||||||||||||
Estimated | Depreciation/ | Depreciation/ | ||||||||||
Asset Category | Useful Lives | Amortization | Amortization | |||||||||
Office furniture, equipment and software | 3 7 years | $ | 75,805 | $ | 131,288 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements | Life of lease | 1,052 | 1,052 | |||||||||
$ | 76,857 | $ | 132,340 | |||||||||
Note 3. Transactions with Parent
The following summarizes transactions with the Parent:
Included in due from parent: | |||||
Net amount due for services rendered | $ | 159,378 | |||
Amount due from intercompany tax allocation | 336,873 | ||||
$ | 496,251 | ||||
Included in due to parent: | |||||
Advances from parent | $ | 502,088 | |||
Amounts due from the Parent are due upon demand. During 1998, approximately 8.8% of revenue was generated from services provided to the Parent.
Amounts due to the Parent bear interest at prime plus 1% (8.5% at December 31, 1998). Amounts outstanding at December 31, 1998 are due on demand after December 31, 1999. During 1998, the Company incurred $42,677 of interest expense which was recorded as a reduction of amounts due from Parent.
F-30
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Note 4. Leases
The Company is obligated under various noncancellable operating leases for office space in Virginia, and equipment expiring through 2002. The lease for office space contains rent escalation clauses based on inflation as measured by a published price index.
Rental expense on the above agreements for the year ended December 31, 1998 amounted to $156,165.
A schedule of future minimum rental payments required under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 1998 is as follows:
Years ending December 31, | ||||
1999 | $ | 161,118 | ||
2000 | 73,897 | |||
2001 | 67,939 | |||
2002 | 29,430 | |||
$ | 332,384 | |||
Note 5. Capital Leases
The Company has entered a capital lease and acquired equipment in the amount of $200,000 as of December 31, 1998. The accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 1998 is $55,556.
Future minimum lease payments under the capital lease is as follows:
Years ending December 31, | ||||
1999 | $ | 75,438 | ||
2000 | 75,438 | |||
150,876 | ||||
Less the amount representing interest | 10,352 | |||
Present value of minimum lease payments | $ | 140,524 | ||
Note 6. Income Tax Matters
The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires a liability approach for measuring deferred tax assets and liabilities based on temporary differences existing at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates in effect when those differences are expected to reverse.
The Company is a subsidiary of Radian Inc. which files a consolidated federal and state tax return. Accordingly, income taxes refundable from the tax authorities are recognized on the financial statements of the parent company who is the taxpayer for income tax purposes. The members of Radian Inc. allocate payments to the Company for the income tax reduction
F-31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
resulting from the Companys inclusion in the consolidated return. This allocation approximates the amounts that would be reported if the Company was separately filing its tax returns, and is reported on the accompanying balance sheet under the caption Due from parent.
The components of the income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 1998, is as follows:
Current: | |||||
Federal | $ | 283,627 | |||
State | 53,246 | ||||
336,873 | |||||
Deferred: | |||||
Federal | 29,000 | ||||
State | 5,000 | ||||
34,000 | |||||
$ | 370,873 | ||||
The deferred tax asset of $34,000 consists of deductible temporary differences from accrued expenses.
Note 7. Retirement Plan
The Company along with Radian Inc., the parent company, has an established investment and savings 401(k) deferred compensation plan for its employees. In order to become a member of the plan an individual must be at least 18 years of age and have completed three months of service or 500 hours. Company contributions are discretionary with no minimum funding requirements and are determined annually. Participants can set aside up to 12% of annual compensation not to exceed ERISA and IRS limits. The Company contributed $69,650 to the plan for the year ended December 31, 1998.
Note 8. Significant Customer and Concentration of Credit Risk
For the year ended December 31, 1998, approximately 23.9% of the Companys revenue was generated from one customer. There was no outstanding balance from this customer at December 31, 1998.
F-32
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
On July 1, 1999, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Radian Systems, Inc., a provider of software development and information systems integration services to corporations, government agencies and other institutions throughout the United States. The purchase price consisted of 1,400,000 shares of common stock valued in an independent appraisal at $1,400,000 and promissory notes of $3,500,000. The Company also incurred direct acquisition costs of $50,000. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
The total purchase price of $4,950,000 was allocated as follows:
Current assets | $1,825,000 | |
Fixed assets | 128,000 | |
Liabilities assumed | (2,411,000) | |
Goodwill | 3,128,000 | |
Covenants not to compete | 2,280,000 | |
$4,950,000 | ||
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations gives effect to this acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 1999, by consolidating the results of operations of Sequoia Software Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999 with the results of operations of Radian Systems, Inc. for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. The financial statements of Radian Systems, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Radian, Inc. prior to its acquisition, include all of the costs attributable to its operations, including an allowable share of corporate overhead.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations is not necessarily indicative of the operating results that would have been achieved had the transaction actually occurred on January 1, 1999, nor are they necessarily indicative of future operations. The pro forma adjustments and the assumptions on which they are based are described in the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Sequoia Software Corporation and the financial statements of Radian Systems, Inc., and the related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
P-1
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
Sequoia Software | Radian | Pro Forma | Pro Forma | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | Systems, Inc.(1) | Total | Adjustments(2) | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Licenses | $ | 4,331,804 | $ | 768,132 | $ | 5,099,936 | $ | (95,000 | )(a) | $ | 5,004,936 | ||||||||||
Services and maintenance | 3,346,589 | 1,663,549 | 5,010,138 | | 5,010,138 | ||||||||||||||||
Hardware | 719,295 | 982,657 | 1,701,952 | | 1,701,952 | ||||||||||||||||
8,397,688 | 3,414,338 | 11,812,026 | (95,000 | ) | 11,717,026 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of licenses | 2,408,802 | 386,128 | 2,794,930 | (75,000 | )(a) | 2,719,930 | |||||||||||||||
Costs of services and maintenance | 2,748,841 | 888,183 | 3,637,024 | | 3,637,024 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of hardware | 922,007 | 843,085 | 1,765,092 | | 1,765,092 | ||||||||||||||||
6,079,650 | 2,117,396 | 8,197,046 | (75,000 | ) | 8,122,046 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 2,318,038 | 1,296,942 | 3,614,980 | (20,000 | ) | 3,594,980 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development | 3,635,114 | 366,340 | 4,001,454 | (20,000 | )(a) | 3,981,454 | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing | 6,826,432 | 607,930 | 7,434,362 | | 7,434,362 | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative | 3,506,277 | 801,590 | 4,307,867 | 635,872 | (b) | 4,943,739 | |||||||||||||||
Bad debt expense | 651,031 | | 651,031 | | 651,031 | ||||||||||||||||
14,618,854 | 1,775,860 | 16,394,714 | 615,872 | 17,010,586 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss from operations | (12,300,816 | ) | (478,918 | ) | (12,779,734 | ) | (635,872 | ) | (13,415,606 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (508,106 | ) | | (508,106 | ) | (140,000 | )(c) | (648,106 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income, net | 16,838 | | 16,838 | | 16,838 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss | (12,792,084 | ) | (478,918 | ) | (13,271,002 | ) | (775,872 | ) | (14,046,874 | ) | |||||||||||
Accretion of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | (2,610,640 | ) | | (2,610,640 | ) | | (2,610,640 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accretion of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | (2,956,965 | ) | | (2,956,965 | ) | | (2,956,965 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accretion of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock to estimated mandatory redemption value | (2,945,974 | ) | | (2,945,974 | ) | | (2,945,974 | ) | |||||||||||||
Pro forma net loss attributable to common stockholders | $ | (21,305,663 | ) | $ | (478,918 | ) | $ | (21,784,581 | ) | $ | (775,872 | ) | $ | (22,560,453 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders(3) | $ | (5.71 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | For the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. |
(2) | Pro forma adjustments to the unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 1999 are made to reflect the following: |
(a) | To record the elimination of intercompany revenue and expense. | |
(b) | To record the additional amortization of goodwill and covenants not to compete over their estimated useful lives of five years for the goodwill and three or four years for covenants not to compete for the period from January 1, 1999 through June 30, 1999. | |
(c) | To record the additional interest expense on promissory notes issued in connection with the acquisition at 8% per annum. |
(3) | Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders is based on pro forma weighted-average shares outstanding of 3,954,273 shares. |
P-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON
The Board of Directors
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Sequoia Software Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated February 7, 2000 (included elsewhere in this Registration Statement). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) of this Registration Statement. This schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
Baltimore, Maryland
S-1
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts
Additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Charged to Costs | Charged to Other | Deductions | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
Description | Beginning of Period | and Expenses | AccountsDescribe | Describe | End of Period | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December, 31, 1999: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deducted from assets accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | | $ | 651,031 | $ | (466,167 | )(1) | $ | 184,864 | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December, 31, 1998: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deducted from assets accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | | $ | 18,898 | $ | (18,898 | )(1) | $ | | |||||||||||||
Year Ended December, 31, 1997: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deducted from assets accounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts | $ | | $ | 5,646 | $ | (5,646 | )(1) | $ | | |||||||||||||
(1) | Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
S-2
[BACK COVER PAGE OF PROSPECTUS]
Back Inside Cover:
At the top of the page is the text XML. Below this is the text The Emerging Web Standard for Data Interchange. At the bottom of the page is the text XPS. Below this is the text XML Portal Server for Increasing Enterprise Productivity and Growth. Near the top left of the page is a page representing some XML marked up illustrative text. To the right of this is the same portal computer screen snapshot from the inside front cover. There is a check-mark shaped shaded area that begins from the XML marked up illustrative text and ends at the portal computer screen snapshot. At the center of this check-marked shaped shaded area is a pie shaped graphic with a center circle. The text of the center circle is XML Portal Server.
Back Cover:
Lightly screened across the entire back page is a line art graphic of the world atlas. Near the top of the page is the text [number] Shares. Below this text is the Sequoia logo with the text SEQUOIA under this logo. Below this is the term Common Stock. Below this text is a two inch horizontal line, under which is the text PROSPECTUS and below which is a date. This is followed by another two inch horizontal line. Approximately half way down the center of the page are five text lines stacked on top of each other: LEHMAN BROTHERS, SG COWEN, WIT SOUNDVIEW, FIDELITY CAPITAL MARKETS, followed by the text a division of National Financial Services Corporation.
Shares
[Sequoia logo]
Common Stock
LEHMAN BROTHERS
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
The following table sets forth the various expenses payable by us in connection with the sale and distribution of the securities offered hereby, other than underwriting discounts and commissions. All of the amounts shown are estimated except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee, the National Association Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee and the Nasdaq National Market listing fee.
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee | $ | ||||
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee | |||||
Nasdaq National Market listing fee | * | ||||
Transfer agents and registrars fees | * | ||||
Printing expenses | * | ||||
Legal fees and expenses | * | ||||
Accounting fees and expenses | * | ||||
Blue Sky filing fees and expenses | * | ||||
Miscellaneous expenses | * | ||||
Total | * | ||||
14. Indemnification Of Officers And Directors
Section 2-418 of the Maryland General Corporation Law permits indemnification of directors, officers, employees and agents of a corporation under certain conditions and subject to limitations. Our bylaws include provisions to require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 2-418, including circumstances in which indemnification is otherwise discretionary. Section 2-418 also empowers us to purchase and maintain insurance that protects our officers, directors, employees and agents against any liabilities incurred in connection with their service in such positions.
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors or officers as to which indemnification is being sought nor are we aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any officer or director.
The form of Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement provides for indemnification of our directors and officers by the Underwriters, for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act.
15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the last three years, we have issued unregistered securities in the transactions described below. These securities were offered and sold by us in reliance upon the exemptions provided for in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, relating to sales not involving any public offering, Rule 506 of the Securities Act relating to sales to accredited investors
II-1
(1) Between December 1997 and August 1998, we issued options exercisable for an aggregate of 141,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share.
(2) In July 1998, we issued 1,303,008 shares of series B preferred stock to a group of accredited investors at a purchase price of $2.7052 and in September 1998, we issued 1,108,976 shares of series B preferred stock to a group of accredited investors at a purchase price of $2.7052 per share for an aggregate of $6,525,000.
(3) Between October 1998 and November 1998, we issued options exercisable for an aggregate of 56,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.28 per share.
(4) Between October 1998 and August 1999, we issued options exercisable for an aggregate of 399,900 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(5) In November 1999, we issued 6,210,258 shares of series C preferred stock to a group of accredited investors at $4.11376 per share for an aggregate of $25,547,478.
(6) In November 1999, we issued warrants to purchase 1,704,311 shares of series D preferred stock to two accredited investors at an exercise price per share of $4.50.
(7) Between November 1999 and December 1999, we issued options exercisable for 306,212 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(8) In March 1999, we issued options to our chief executive officer for an aggregate of 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(9) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our directors for an aggregate of 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(10) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our directors for an aggregate of 18,750 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(11) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our directors for an aggregate of 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(12) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our directors for an aggregate of 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(13) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our directors for an aggregate of 6,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(14) In March 1999, we issued options to one of our executive officers for an aggregate of 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
(15) In November 1999, we issued options to our chief executive officer for an aggregate of 62,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(16) In November 1999, we issued options to one of our executive officers for an aggregate of 37,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
II-2
(17) In November 1999, we issued options to one of our executive officers for an aggregate of 37,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(18) In November 1999, we issued options to our president for an aggregate of 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(19) In January 2000, we issued options to on of our executive officers for an aggregate of 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(20) In February 2000, we issued options to one of our executive officers for an aggregate of 12,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
(21) In February 2000, we issued options to three of our executive officers for an aggregate of 325,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.80 per share.
16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
1.1 | * | Form of Underwriting Agreement | ||
3.1.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement, dated as of November 23, 1999, as amended | |||
3.1.2 | Articles of Amendment, dated as of February 7, 2000 | |||
3.1.3 | * | Form of Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement, dated as of , 2000 (to be effective immediately after the closing of this offering) | ||
3.2.1 | Amended and Restated By-laws, dated as of July 23, 1998 | |||
3.2.2 | * | Form of Second Amended and Restated By-laws, dated as of , 2000 (to be effective immediately after the closing of this offering) | ||
4.1 | * | Specimen stock certificate for shares of common stock of Sequoia | ||
5.1 | * | Opinion of Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP, regarding legality of securities being registered | ||
10.1 | Investor Rights Agreement dated November 23, 1999 by and among Sequoia and certain investors and stockholders named therein | |||
10.2 | Lease Agreement dated August 18, 1995, by and between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Sequoia | |||
10.2.1 | First Amendment to Lease dated October 24, 1997, by and between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Sequoia | |||
10.2.2 | Second Amendment to Lease dated November 9, 1998, by and between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Sequoia | |||
10.2.3 | Third Amendment to Lease dated June 8, 1999, by and between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and Sequoia | |||
10.3 | Lease Agreement between Lernout & Hauspie (Ireland) Limited and Redwood Software Europe Limited (d/b/a Sequoia Software Europe) | |||
10.4 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Richard C. Faint, Jr., dated January 1, 2000 |
II-3
Exhibit No. | Description of Exhibit | |||
10.5 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Mark A. Wesker, dated January 1, 2000 | |||
10.6 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Anil Sethi, dated January 1, 2000 | |||
10.7 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Marc E. Rubin, dated January 1, 2000 | |||
10.8 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Kenneth E. Tighe, dated January 1, 2000 | |||
10.9 | Employment Agreement between Sequoia and Gregory G. Heard, dated January 24, 2000; | |||
10.10 | * | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan | ||
21.1 | Subsidiaries of Sequoia | |||
23.1 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (regarding the financial statements of Sequoia) | |||
23.2 | Consent of Keller, Bruner & Company, LLP (regarding the financial statements of Radian Systems) | |||
23.3 | * | Consent of Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1 hereto) | ||
24.1 | Power of Attorney (included in signature pages) | |||
27.1 | Financial Data Schedule |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules:
Report of Independent Auditors on Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts (contained in the Financial Statements section of the prospectus)
All other schedules have been omitted because the information required to be shown in those schedules is not applicable or is included elsewhere in our financial statements or the notes thereto.
17. Undertakings
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the Underwriting Agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the provisions of its charter or bylaws or the Maryland general corporation law or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer,
II-4
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, the information omitted form the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the Company has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the County of Howard, State of Maryland, on the 8th day of February 2000.
SEQUOIA SOFTWARE CORPORATION |
By: | /s/ RICHARD C. FAINT, JR. |
|
|
Richard C. Faint, Jr. Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated. Each person whose signature appears below in so signing also makes, constitutes and appoints Richard C. Faint, Jr. and Mark A. Wesker, and each of them acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to execute and cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission any and all amendments and post-effective amendments to this Registration Statement, or any registration statement for this offering that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact or his or her substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ RICHARD C. FAINT, JR. Richard C. Faint, Jr. |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ MARK A. WESKER Mark A. Wesker |
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ ANIL SETHI Anil Sethi |
Chief Technology Officer, Vice President, and Assistant Secretary | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ GREGORY G. HEARD Gregory G. Heard |
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), Vice President, and Treasurer | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ MARC E. RUBIN Marc E. Rubin |
Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President, and Secretary | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ WILLIAM M. GUST II William M. Gust II |
Director | February 8, 2000 |
II-6
Signature | Title | Date | ||
/s/ JONATHAN I. GRABEL Jonathan I. Grabel |
Director | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ ANDREW J. FILIPOWSKI Andrew J. Filipowski |
Director | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ MARVIN W. ADAMS Marvin W. Adams |
Director | February 8, 2000 | ||
/s/ LAWRENCE A. BETTINO Lawrence A. Bettino |
Director | February 8, 2000 |
II-7
|