INNOVACOM INC
424B3, 2001-01-19
COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN
Previous: RALCORP HOLDINGS INC /MO, DEF 14A, 2001-01-19
Next: MPEG SUPER SITE INC, 10KSB/A, 2001-01-19




                                            Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
                                            Registration Statement No. 333-42766



                                 INNOVACOM INC.


                           Prospectus Supplement No. 7
                      (To Prospectus Dated August 30, 2000)

     This  supplement  number 7 supercedes  and replaces  supplements  numbers 1
through 6. You should read this prospectus  supplement  number 7 and the related
prospectus dated August 30, 2000,  carefully before you invest.  These documents
contain information you should consider when making your investment decision.

     On  December  21,  2000,  we  requested  our  fourth  draw down to  Jashell
Investments Limited in connection with the common stock purchase agreement dated
June 19,  2000,  as amended on July 26,  2000,  evidencing  an equity  draw down
facility  between us and  Jashell  Investments  Limited.  The draw down began on
December 21, 2000,  ended on January 10, 2001,  and settled on January 12, 2001.
During this period,  Jashell  Investments Limited purchased a total of 4,482,909
shares of our common  stock at an average  purchase  price of $0.0692  per share
which  represents 79% of the Volume  Weighted  Average Daily Price of our common
stock as quoted on the OTC  Bulletin  Board  during  that  period of $0.0876 per
share.  These purchases resulted in aggregate proceeds of $250,000 being paid to
us by Jashell  Investments  Limited.  In addition,  we paid Jashell  Investments
Limited an additional  $33,333,  as part of the draw down pursuant to the common
stock purchase  agreement.  In connection  with our December 21, 2000, draw down
notice, we indicated no threshold price.

     Prior to our fourth draw down,  we had three prior draw downs with  Jashell
Investments Limited which can be summarized as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

        Draw Down              Gross Proceeds           Shares Issued        Average Purchase Price
        ---------              --------------           -------------        ----------------------
<S>                           <C>                    <C>                        <C>
           1A                         $375,000               1,185,471                  $0.3163
           1B                         $188,418                 760,000                  $0.2479
           2A                         $109,091                 498,227                  $0.2190
           2B                         $200,000               1,225,698                  $0.1632
           3A                         $251,461               2,330,710                  $0.1079
           3B                         $300,000               3,783,394                  $0.0793

</TABLE>

<PAGE>2

     Each draw down was divided into two tranches.  Pursuant to the common stock
purchase  agreement,  for the  first  six draw  downs,  we will pay or have paid
Jashell  Investments  Limited a fee of $33,333  from the  proceeds  of the first
tranche of each draw  down.  Further  during the first draw down,  and the first
tranche of the second drawn,  we indicated a threshold price of $0.25 per share.
Since the  second  tranche  of the  second  drawn  down,  we have  indicated  no
threshold price.

     The shares  issued in  connection  with the three prior draw downs  include
shares that were acquired upon the exercise of warrants.  Under the terms of the
common stock purchase agreement with Jashell Investments  Limited, in connection
with each drawn down,  Jashaell  Investments  Limited has the right to request a
warrant to  purchase  up to  one-half  of the  number of shares of common  stock
issued in such draw down at an  exercise  price  equal to the  average  purchase
price of the common  stock  issued in the draw down.  The term of the warrant is
for a 22 business day period. As of the date of this supplement, all outstanding
warrants  issued  in  connection  with the prior  draw  downs  have been  either
exercised in whole or in part or expired.  No warrants were issued in connection
with the fourth draw down.

     The attached prospectus relates to the resale of shares acquired by Jashell
Investments Limited pursuant to the stock purchase agreement and pursuant to the
exercise  of  warrants  held by Jashell  Investments  Limited.  Because  Jashell
Investments  Limited may sell some or all of these shares, and because there are
currently no agreements, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale
of any of these shares, we cannot estimate the actual amount of shares that they
will hold, if any, after the completion of the offering.

     The  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  common  stock  issued  to  the  Jashell
Investments Limited will be used for working capital.  Although we have received
cash from the sale of our products and from the  settlement of  litigation,  our
operations  have  been  primarily  financed  from the sale of our  common  stock
pursuant to the common stock purchase agreement. As disclosed in the prospectus,
the sale of the  common  stock  has had a  substantial  dilutive  effect  on our
existing  shareholders.  Until we achieve  sufficient  sales of our  products to
finance our operations,  which we do not anticipate in the near future,  we will
need  additional  financing for our  operations.  In the past, we have relied on
borrowings,  and more  recently  the sale of our common  stock  pursuant  to the
common stock purchase agreement, to finance our operations. We are continuing to
review all strategic alternatives available to us.

     In September 2000, Mr. Robert  Sibthorpe and, in a letter dated December 8,
2000,  Mr.  John  Champlin,  resigned  from the  board.  Our board of  directors
currently consists of Messrs.  Alioto,  Casey, Low and Koz. At this time, we are
focusing our efforts on business and do not intend to seek replacement directors
in the near future.


           The date of this prospectus supplement is January 12, 2001.


Top Judgements:
Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd. | Aug 12, 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc. | May 31, 2022
Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation | Jan 6, 2022
Canada (National Revenue) v. Ghermezian | Feb 23, 2022
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local Unions 835 v South Shore District Health Authority | Jan 17, 2015
Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. | Sep 16, 2016
Canadian Airport Workers Union v Goodwill Industries | Mar 4, 2022
Cassan v. The Queen | Sep 8, 2017
Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association, I.A.A.F. Local 3888 v City of Toronto | Aug 26, 2022
Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia (Attorney General) | Sep 10, 2020
Cowichan Tribes v Canada | Jun 3, 2022
Brain cancer (glioblastoma multiforme) | ONWSIAT Decision No. 1642/21 | Jul 18, 2022
Konicek v Vantown Infrastructure Invesco Inc. | Sep 9, 2022
C.S.S. Office Furniture Systems Service Inc. v Burns | Aug 11, 2022
Saskatoon Co-operative Association Limited v United Food and Commercial Workers | Aug 15, 2022
Old Lakeshore Inc. v City of Burlington | Sep 2, 2022
Tietz v. Affinor Growers Inc. | Sep 13, 2022
Efficiencyone (E1) | Sep 6, 2022
President's Choice Bank v. The Queen | Jul 19, 2022
First Global Data Ltd | Sep 15, 2022
Rayonier v Unifor, Locals 256 and 89 | Aug 11, 2022
Alberta Workers’ Compensation Appeals Commission | Decision No. 2021-0334 | Jul 14, 2022
Metrowest Developments Ltd v Flynn Canada Ltd | Sep 14, 2022
R. v. Cameron | Jul 15, 2022
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management | Jul 28, 2022
101034761 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Mossing | Aug 24, 2022
Waste Control Services Inc. v International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 115 | Aug 12, 2022
RJM56 Holdings Inc. c. Bazinet | Aug 17, 2022
Sherwood v The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 1549 | Aug 9, 2022
WCAT Decision A2001487 | Aug 8, 2022
City of Hamilton v Ontario Water Employees’ Association | Sep 12, 2022
Century Services Corp. v. LeRoy | Jul 8, 2022
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175 v Metro Ontario Inc. | Jul 4, 2022
Langmaid’s Island Corporation v Lake of Bays | Sep 12, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102416 | Jul 22, 2022
Inquiry about McAbee Fossil beds | Jul 14, 2022
1088558 Ontario Inc. v. Musial | Sep 16, 2022
Biogen Canada Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc. | Aug 8, 2022
CIC Management Services Inc. v City of Toronto | Jul 21, 2022
Bonterra Energy Corp v Rosells’ Enterprises Ltd | Aug 31, 2022
WCAT Decision A2100606 | Aug 17, 2022
Leffler v Aaron Behiel Legal Professional Corporation | Jun 30, 2022
Espartel Investments v. MTCC No. 993 | Aug 19, 2022
Onespace Unlimited Inc. v. Plus Development Group Corp. | Sep 19, 2022
Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Canada Revenue Agency | Jun 23, 2022
Community Savings Credit Union v. Bodnar | Jul 29, 2022
Galperti SRL v F.I.A.L. Finanziaria Industrie Alto Lario S.P.A | Jun 30, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102352 | Jul 6, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102306 | Jul 25, 2022
Thrive Capital Management Ltd. v. Noble 1324 Queen Inc. | Jul 12, 2022
Questor Technology Inc v Stagg | Sep 8, 2022
MediPharm v. Hexo and Hwang | Jul 25, 2022
Immunization rates & vaccine hesitancy | Aug 17, 2022
Morabito v. British Columbia Securities Commission | Aug 12, 2022
Killeleagh v Mountain View County (Development Authority) | Aug 24, 2022
Quality Control Council v Stanley Inspection Canada Ltd. | Sep 9, 2022
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation | Aug 17, 2022
Abbeylawn Manor Living Inc. v Sevice Employees International Union, Local 1 Canada | Jul 5, 2022
Windrift Adventures Inc. et al. v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector | Aug 18, 2022
Irani and Khan v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act | Jul 14, 2022
CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited v City of Toronto | Aug 12, 2022
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. v. The Queen | Jul 7, 2022
Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc. | Jul 22, 2022
Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183, Union v Mulmer Services Ltd. | Aug 5, 2022

© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission