<PAGE>
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2000
Registration No. 333-75895
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________
POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under The Securities Act of 1933
Notify Technology Corporation
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
California 3661 77-0382248
<S> <C> <C>
(State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification Number)
</TABLE>
1054 S. De Anza Blvd. Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
(408) 777-7920
(Address and telephone number, of principal executive offices)
1054 S. De Anza Blvd. Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
(408) 777-7920
(Address of principal place of business or intended principal place of business)
Paul F. DePond
President and Chief Executive Officer
1054 S. De Anza Blvd. Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
(408) 777-7920
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
HENRY P. MASSEY, JR., ESQ.
PETER S. HEINECKE, ESQ.
MICHAEL A. DE ANGELIS, ESQ.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
(650) 493-9300
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:
As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the
Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [X]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [_]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule
462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration
statement for the same offering. [_]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule
434, please check the following box. [_]
_________________
Pursuant to Rule 416, there are also being registered such additional
shares and warrants as may be become issuable pursuant to anti-dilution
provisions upon the exercise of the Class A Warrants.
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall
file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration
Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a),
may determine.
================================================================================
<PAGE>
PROSPECTUS
NOTIFY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
425,000 Shares of Common Stock and
425,000 Class A Warrants
The selling security holders identified in the prospectus are offering
either (i) up to 425,000 of our Class A warrants or (ii) up to 425,000 shares of
our common stock which underlie those Class A warrants. We issued these warrants
in March 1997 in connection with a bridge loan.
We are offering up to 425,000 shares of our common stock to persons holding
Class A warrants sold by the selling security holders, who elect to exercise the
warrants.
We will receive no proceeds from the sale of the Class A warrants or the
underlying common stock by the selling security holders. We will receive $6.50,
subject to adjustment, for each Class A warrant exercised.
Our common stock, Class A warrants and Units are currently listed on the
Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbols "NTFY," "NTFYW" and "NTFYU,"
respectively. Each Unit consists of one share of our common stock and one Class
A warrant. Our Class A warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of
common stock at an exercise price of $6.50, subject to adjustment, until August
28, 2002.
___________________
THE SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY INVOLVE A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 3 OF THIS PROSPECTUS
___________________
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS
PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
The date of this Prospectus is April 18, 2000
-1-
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.......................................... 2
Risk Factors............................................................................... 3
Use of Proceeds............................................................................ 11
Price Range of Common Stock, Class A Warrants and Units.................................... 11
Dividend Policy............................................................................ 12
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations...... 13
Business................................................................................... 18
Management................................................................................. 24
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................................. 30
Principal Shareholders..................................................................... 31
Description of Securities.................................................................. 35
Selling Security Holders................................................................... 38
Plan of Distribution....................................................................... 39
Legal Matters.............................................................................. 41
Experts.................................................................................... 41
Additional Information..................................................................... 41
Index to Financial Statements.............................................................. F-1
</TABLE>
__________________
We are a California corporation. Our principal executive offices are
located at 1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105, San Jose, California 95129, and our
telephone number is (408) 777-7920. In this prospectus, "Notify Technology,"
"we," "us," and "our" refer to Notify Technology Corporation, unless the context
otherwise requires.
You should rely only on the information incorporated by reference or
provided in this prospectus. We have authorized no one to provide you with
different information. We are not making an offer of these securities in any
state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the
information in this prospectus or the prospectus supplement is accurate as of
any date other than the date on the front of the document.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation," "Business," and
elsewhere in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. These
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors
that may cause our or our industry's results, levels of activity, performance,
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of
activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-
looking statements. These factors include, among others, those listed under
"Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology
such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these
terms or other comparable terminology.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of
activity, performance, or achievements. We do not assume responsibility for the
accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We do not intend
to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this
prospectus to conform them to actual results.
____________________
Trade names and trademarks of other companies appearing in this prospectus are
the property of their respective holders.
-2-
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock and Class A warrants may subject you to risks
inherent in our business. The performance of our common stock and our Class
A warrants will reflect the performance of our business relative to, among other
things, our competition, general economic and market conditions and industry
conditions. The value of your investment may increase or decline and could
result in a loss. You should carefully consider the following factors as well
as other information contained in this prospectus before deciding to invest in
our common stock or Class A warrants.
We Have a Limited Operating History and a History of Losses, Moreover,
There is No Assurance of Future Profitability
We commenced operations in August 1994 and through January 1996 were
engaged primarily in research and development. Accordingly, we have a limited
operating history, and we face all of the risks and uncertainties encountered by
early-stage companies. For the fiscal years ended September 30, 1999, 1998 and
1997, we incurred net losses of $3,123,284, $2,617,561 and $1,382,910,
respectively. As of December 31, 1999, we had an accumulated deficit of
$9,906,884 and working capital of $2,956,063. We anticipate having a negative
cash flow from operating activities in future quarters and years. We incurred a
net loss of $699,849 for the three-month period ended December 31, 1999 and
expect to incur further operating losses in future quarters and years. These
losses will continue until we sell substantially more of our products and our
revenue exceeds our operational expenses. We may never sell significantly more
of our products or achieve or sustain profitability. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and
"Business--Sales, Marketing and Distribution."
Our Quarterly Operating Results May Vary
We anticipate that we will experience significant fluctuations in our
operating results in the future. Fluctuations in operating results may cause the
price of our common stock, Units and Class A warrants to be volatile. Operating
results may vary as a result of many factors, including the following:
. our level of research and development;
. our sales and marketing activities;
. announcements by us or our competitors;
. size and timing of orders from customers;
. new product introductions by us or our competitors; and
. price erosion.
Each of the above factors is difficult to control and forecast. Thus, they
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Notwithstanding the difficulty in forecasting future sales, we generally
must undertake research and development and sales and marketing activities and
other commitments months or years in advance. Accordingly, any shortfall in
product revenues in a given quarter may materially adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations because we are unable to adjust
expenses during the quarter to match the level of product revenues, if any, for
the quarter. Due to these and other factors, we believe that quarter to quarter
comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and
should not be relied upon
-3-
<PAGE>
as indications of the future performance. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Our Products May Not Be Accepted
We sold the first MessageAlert in January 1996, the first Centrex
Receptionist in March 1998 and the first Call Manager product in April 1999. We
also announced the first sales of the new Visual Got Mail products into trial
programs in November 1999. To date, we have received only limited revenue from
the sale of these products. We expect to sell only a limited number of our
MessageAlert product because it is a mature product with limited demand and we
no longer feature it in our sales plan. While we believe that our other products
are commercially viable, developing products for the consumer and business
marketplaces is inherently difficult and uncertain. We do not believe our sales
to date are sufficient to determine whether or not there is meaningful consumer
or business demand for our products.
We intend to devote significant resources to sales and marketing efforts
and to promote consumer and business interest in our products. There can be no
assurance that these efforts will be successful or that significant market
demand for our products will ever develop. See "Business--Products," and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."
We Depend on Limited Number of Potential Customers and Need to Develop Marketing
Channels
We believe our success, if any, will be largely dependent on our ability to
either sell our products to, or enter into joint marketing arrangements with,
the seven Regional Bell Operating Companies, or RBOCs, and approximately 20
large Local Exchange Carriers, or LECs, in the United States. In particular, we
believe that we can successfully sell our Call Manager and Centrex Receptionist
products only if we sell them to or in conjunction with the RBOCs and LECs. We
also expect to rely significantly on the RBOCs and LECs as a channel for our
initial sales of our Visual Got Mail product. Sales to RBOCs and LECs
constituted 69%, 71% and 86% of our revenue for the fiscal years ended September
30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. In addition, two customers accounted for
55% and 11% of sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, and two
customers accounted for 50% and 17% of sales for the fiscal year ended September
30, 1998. To date, we have sold our products to five RBOCs and twelve LECs. It
took us substantially longer than we originally anticipated to qualify our
product and develop the marketing relationships necessary to make these sales.
RBOCs and LECs tend to be hierarchical, which distribute decision-making
authority and resist taking risks. Selling a product to or entering into a
marketing relationship with an RBOC or LEC is generally a lengthy process
requiring multiple meetings with numerous people in the organization. If we fail
to develop significantly enhanced relationships with the RBOCs and LECs, our
business and operating results would be materially adversely affected.
We also intend to develop other distribution channels for our products,
including competitive local exchange carriers, direct sales via an internet
store and potential development of internet service provider channels. Our
management will need to expend time and effort to develop these channels.
Because our marketing efforts have been largely focused on developing
relationships with RBOCs and LECs, our management has had only limited
experience in selling our products through these channels. We may not be able to
implement this marketing and distribution program to expand our distribution
channels and any marketing efforts undertaken by or on behalf of us may not be
successful. See "Business--Sales, Marketing and Distribution."
-4-
<PAGE>
Our Products May Suffer from Defects
Our products incorporate a combination of reasonably sophisticated computer
chip design, electric circuit design, software programming and telephony
technology. We have devoted substantial resources to researching and developing
each of these elements. In order to reduce the manufacturing costs, expand the
feature sets and otherwise enhance the operation of our products, we have from
time to time redesigned our products. We expect that in the future we will
engage in similar redesigns of our products. In addition, we are in the process
of developing new, similarly complex products. Though we extensively test our
products before marketing them, any new, redesigned or current product may
contain design flaws that we won't detect through our testing procedures. In
addition, we rely on subcontractors to manufacture our products. Though we have
quality control procedures designed to detect manufacturing errors, there can be
no assurance that we will identify all defective products. We believe that
reliable operation will be an important purchase consideration for both our
consumer and business customers. A failure by us to detect and prevent a design
flaw or a widespread product defect could materially adversely affect the sales
of the affected product and our other products, which could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and operating results. See "Business--
Products" and "--Manufacturing."
We Face Significant Competition
We believe the market for our products is highly competitive and that
competition is likely to intensify. In the Caller-ID market, we compete directly
with CIDCO Incorporated, TT Systems, Astra Telecom of Canada and Thompson
Consumer Inc. In the market for auto-attendant products, we compete with
SoloPoint.com, Inc. In the market for visual message waiting indicators, we
compete directly with SoloPoint.com, Inc. and Comsumerware Inc. Finally, our
Visual GotMail technology indirectly competes with several companies, including
Landel Telecom and CIDCO Incorporated. Some of these companies have greater
financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. In addition, there are
several companies with substantially greater technical, financial and marketing
resources than we do that could produce competing products. These companies
include telephone equipment manufacturers such as Northern Telecom, Inc. and
Lucent Technologies, Inc. We expect that to the extent that the market for our
products develops, competition will intensify and new competitors will enter the
market. We may not be able to compete successfully against existing and new
competitors as the market for our products evolves and the level of competition
increases. A failure to compete successfully against existing and new
competitors would materially adversely effect our business and results of
operations.
We Depend on Key Executives
Our potential for success depends significantly on key management
employees, including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr.
Paul F. DePond, our Chief Operations Officer, Gaylan Larson and our Chief
Financial Officer, Gerald W. Rice. We have obtained three-year key-man term life
insurance on Mr. DePond in the amount of $2,000,000 and have entered into
employment agreements with him along with Mr. Larson and Mr. Rice. The loss of
their services or those of any of our other key employees would materially
adversely effect us. We also believe that our future success will depend in
large part on our ability to attract and retain additional highly skilled
technical, management, sales and marketing personnel. If we were unable to hire
the necessary personnel, the development of new products and enhancements to
current products would likely be delayed or prevented. Competition for these
highly-skilled employees is intense. Therefore, there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in retaining our key personnel and in attracting and
retaining the personnel we require for expansion. See "Business--Employees" and
"Management."
-5-
<PAGE>
Our Intellectual Property May Not Be Adequately Protected and We May Infringe
the Rights of Others
We regard various features and design aspects of our products as
proprietary and rely primarily on a combination of patent and trademark laws and
employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements to protect our proprietary
rights. We have been issued a patent covering the design of our MessageAlert
products, and a patent covering the MultiSense technology used in our
MessageAlert product. We have also applied for patents on our Visual Got Mail
technology. We intend to continue to apply for patents, as appropriate, for our
future technologies and products. There are few barriers to entry into the
market for our products, and there can be no assurance that any patents we apply
for will be granted or that the scope of our patents or any patents granted in
the future will be broad enough to protect us against the use of similar
technologies by our competitors. There can be no assurance, therefore, that any
of our competitors, some of whom have far greater resources than we do, will not
independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior
to our technology. See "--Competition."
We may be involved from time to time in litigation to determine the
enforceability, scope and validity of any of our proprietary rights or of third
parties asserting infringement claims against us. These claims could result in
substantial cost to us and could divert our management and technical personnel
away from their normal responsibilities. See "Business--Proprietary Rights."
We May Not Be Able to Obtain Critical Components from Our Suppliers
Currently, we are able to obtain many key components used in our products
only from single or limited sources. We do not have long term supply contracts
with these or any other component vendors and purchase all of our components on
a purchase order basis. Component shortages may occur and we may not be able to
obtain the components we need in a timely manner and on a commercially
reasonable basis. In particular, the microcontroller that forms the core of our
Call Manager and Visual Got Mail products is manufactured only by Epson
Electronics America, Inc. From time to time, the semiconductor industry has
experienced extreme supply constraints. If we are unable to obtain sufficient
quantities of microcontrollers from Epson Electronics America, Inc., our
business and operating results would be materially adversely effected.
We utilize offshore manufactures to manufacture our products and these
manufacturers may not be able to support our manufacturing requirements. If we
are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of sole-source components or
subassemblies, or to develop alternate sources, we could experience delays or
reductions in product shipments or be forced to redesign our products. Each of
these scenarios could materially adversely effect our business and operating
results. See "Business--Manufacturing."
Our Products May Not Comply with Government Regulations and Industry Standards
Our products must comply with a variety of regulations and standards. These
include regulations and standards set by the Federal Communications Commission,
Underwriters Laboratories, National Registered Testing Laboratories, and Bell
Communications Research. As our business expands into international markets we
will be required to comply with whatever governmental regulations and industry
standards exist in those markets. In addition, the U.S. telecommunications
market is evolving rapidly in part due to recently enacted laws revamping the
telecommunications regulatory structure. Additional legislative or regulatory
changes are possible. If we fail to comply with existing regulations and
standards or to adapt to new regulations and standards, our business and
operating results could be materially adversely effected. See "Business--
Governmental Regulation and Industry Standards."
-6-
<PAGE>
We May Not Be Able to Manage Our Planned Growth
We plan to expand our business operations during fiscal year 2000. This
expansion could strain our limited personnel, financial, management and other
resources. In order to manage our planned growth, we will need to maintain our
product development program and expand our sales and marketing capabilities and
personnel. In addition, we will need to adapt our financial planning,
accounting systems and management structure to accommodate this growth if it
occurs. Our failure to properly anticipate or manage our growth, if any, could
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. See
"Business."
Sales of Outstanding Shares May Hurt Our Stock Price
The market price for our common stock could fall substantially if our
shareholders sell large amounts of our common stock. Potential future sales of
our common stock include the following:
. 425,000 Class A warrants and the underlying shares of common stock,
which we are registering with this Prospectus.
. 1,788,505 outstanding shares of our common stock and options and
warrants to purchase our common stock are "restricted securities"
within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. Pursuant to Rule 144, substantially all of these restricted
shares are eligible for resale subject to the restrictions on
transferability relating to 1,367,484 shares of our common stock or
warrants to purchase shares of our common stock placed in an escrow in
connection with our initial public offering. See "Principal
Shareholders -Escrow Securities."
. The holder of an option to purchase 160,000 Units consisting of one
share of common stock and one Class A warrant has demand and "piggy-
back" registration rights covering our securities. We could incur
substantial expenses if this option holder exercises this option.
. David Brewer holds 1,317,400 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase 877,044 shares of common stock. We have agreed to register
for resale these shares of common stock, including the shares
underlying the warrants, at the request of Mr. Brewer.
Sales or the possibility of sales of our common stock in the public market
may adversely affect the market price of our securities.
Exercise of Outstanding Options and Warrants May Dilute Current Shareholders
The following options and warrants to purchase our common stock are
outstanding:
. 1,600,000 Class A warrants to purchase 1,600,000 shares of our common
stock for $6.50 per share, issued in connection with our initial
public offering, subject to adjustment in some circumstances;
. 425,000 Class A warrants to purchase 425,000 shares of our common
stock for $6.50 per share, issued in connection with our 1997 bridge
financing;
. an option to purchase 160,000 Units at a price per Unit of $7.00
issued to the underwriter of our initial public offering;
. additional warrants as of March 1, 2000 to purchase 205,510 shares of
our common stock; and
-7-
<PAGE>
. 430,618 options outstanding as of March 1, 2000 under our 1997 Stock
Plan, and subject to vesting requirements. 685,382 shares of our
common stock are reserved for issuance under our 1997 Stock Plan.
. warrants to purchase 877,044 shares of common stock at a price of
$3.60 held by David Brewer.
Holders of these options and warrants may exercise them at a time when we
would otherwise be able to obtain additional equity capital on terms more
favorable to us. Moreover, while these options are outstanding, our ability to
obtain financing on favorable terms may be adversely affected. See "Management"
and "Description of Securities."
Our Stock Price May be Volatile
The market price for our common stock may be affected by a number of
factors, including the announcement of new products or product enhancements by
us or our competitors, the loss of services of one or more of our executive
officers or other key employees, quarterly variations in our or our competitors'
results of operations, changes in earnings estimates, developments in our
industry, sales of substantial numbers of shares of our common stock in the
public market, general market conditions and other factors, including factors
unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our
competitors. In addition, stock prices for many companies in the technology
sector have experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the
operating performances of these companies. These factors and fluctuations, as
well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions,
may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Warrantholders May Not Be Able to Exercise Class A Warrants Because of Lack of
Current Prospectus or State Registration
The Class A warrants included in our Units sold at our initial public
offering are detachable and separately tradeable. We did not knowingly sell the
Units to purchasers in jurisdictions in which our Units are not registered under
federal law or otherwise qualified for sale under state law. Nevertheless,
purchasers who reside in or move to jurisdictions in which the shares underlying
the warrants are not so registered or qualified during the period that the
warrants are exercisable may buy Units (or the warrants included therein) in the
aftermarket. In this event, we would be unable to issue shares to those persons
desiring to exercise their warrants unless and until the underlying shares could
be registered or qualified for sale in the jurisdictions in which such
purchasers reside, or unless an exemption from such qualification exists in such
jurisdictions. No assurance can be given that we will be able to effect any such
required registration or qualification.
Additionally, holders of the Units will be able to exercise the warrants
included therein only if a current prospectus relating to the shares underlying
the warrants is then in effect under the Federal Securities Law and such shares
are qualified for sale or exempt from qualification under the applicable
securities or "blue sky" laws of the states in which the various holders of the
warrants then reside. Although we have undertaken to use reasonable efforts to
maintain the effectiveness of a current prospectus covering the shares
underlying the warrants, no assurance can be given that we will be able to do
so. The value of the warrants may be greatly reduced if a current prospectus
covering the shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants is not kept
effective or if such securities are not qualified or exempt from qualification
in the states in which the holders of the warrants then reside.
-8-
<PAGE>
Redemption of Class A Warrants May Adversely Affect Warrantholders
We may redeem our Class A warrants on at least 30 days' prior written
notice, if the average closing bid price of our common stock for 30 consecutive
trading days ending within 15 days of the date on which we give a redemption
notice exceeds $9.10 per share. If we redeem our Class A warrants, holders of
our Class A warrants will lose their right to exercise our Class A warrants,
except during such 30-day notice of redemption period. Upon the receipt of a
notice of redemption of our Class A warrants, the holders thereof would be
required to:
1. exercise the warrants and pay the exercise price at a time when it may
be disadvantageous for them to do so;
2. sell the warrants at the then current market price (if any) when they
might otherwise wish to hold the warrants; or
3. accept the redemption price, which is likely to be substantially less
than the market value of the warrants at the time of redemption.
We Do Not Expect to Pay Dividends
We have not paid any dividends to our shareholders since our inception and
do not plan to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to reinvest
earnings, if any, in the development and expansion of our business. See
"Dividend Policy."
Our Officers and Directors Substantially Control Us
Based upon the number of shares of our common stock that are outstanding as
of March 1, 2000, our officers and directors as a group will beneficially own
approximately 56.6%, of our outstanding common stock after giving effect to the
exercise of all currently exercisable outstanding options and warrants held by
such individuals. Consequently, the officers and directors as a group will be
able to exert substantial influence over the election of our directors and the
direction of our policies. See "Principal Shareholders."
We Have Contractual Obligations to the Underwriter of our Initial Public
Offering
Until August 28, 2002, in the event D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.,
the underwriter of our initial public offering, originates financing or a
merger, acquisition, or transaction to which we are a party, we will be
obligated to pay it a finder's fee in consideration for originating any of these
transactions. The fee is based on a percentage of the consideration paid in the
transaction, ranging from 7% of the first $1,000,000 to 2-1/2% of any
consideration in excess of $9,000,000. In addition, D.H. Blair Investment
Banking Corp. has exercised its right to designate one person to sit on our
board of directors until August 28, 2002. The designee, Mr. Andrew Plevin, was
an employee of the D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp., but is now the Acting
President and Chief Executive Officer of Core Software Technology, Inc.
Our Charter Provisions May Discourage Acquisition Bids
Our board of directors has authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of
Preferred Stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and
restrictions, including voting rights for these shares, without any further vote
or action by our shareholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock
will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders
of any Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of
Preferred Stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible
acquisition and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it
more difficult for a third party to acquire a
-9-
<PAGE>
majority of our outstanding voting stock. We have no current plans to issue
shares of Preferred Stock. See "Description of Securities--Preferred Stock."
Our Net Income Will Be Decreased if the Escrow Securities Are Released
In connection with our initial public offering, many of our shareholders,
including current officers, directors and employees, placed a substantial
portion of our securities then held by them into an escrow. These securities
will be released from escrow if we reach pre-tax earnings targets or share price
targets. Upon the release from this escrow of any securities owned by our
officers, directors, consultants or employees, we will be required to record a
compensation expense for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, in any
period in which securities are released from this escrow, we will record a
substantial noncash charge to earnings that will increase our loss or reduce or
eliminate earnings, if any, at that time. The amount of this charge will be
equal to the aggregate market price of the securities owned by directors,
officers and employees which are released from the escrow. Although the amount
of compensation expense recognized by the us will not affect our total
shareholders' equity or cash flow, it may have a depressive effect on the market
price of our securities. See "Principal Shareholders--Escrow Securities"
Our Articles of Incorporation Limit the Liability of Officers and Directors and
We Have Entered into Indemnification Agreements with Them
Our Articles of Incorporation eliminate in certain circumstances the
liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary
duties as directors. We have also entered into indemnification agreements with
each of our directors and officers. Each of these indemnification agreements
provides that we will indemnify the indemnitee against expenses, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, judgments, penalties, fines, and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any civil
or criminal action or administrative proceeding arising out of their performance
of duties as a director or officer, other than an action instituted by the
director or officer. These indemnification agreements also require that we
indemnify the director or other party thereto in all cases to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable law. Each indemnification agreement permits the director
or officer that is party thereto to bring suit to seek recovery of amounts due
under the indemnification agreement and to recover the expenses of such a suit
if they are successful. See "Management--Indemnification of Officers and
Directors and Related Matters."
-10-
<PAGE>
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of our Class A warrants in
the offering. However, if we sell all shares of our common stock offered hereby,
the proceeds to us would be approximately $2,762,500, less expenses. We expect
the net proceeds to be used for working capital and for general corporate
purposes.
Pending application, the net proceeds of the Offering will be invested in
short-term, high grade interest-bearing savings accounts, certificates of
deposit, United States government obligations, money market accounts or short-
term interest bearing obligations.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK, CLASS A WARRANTS AND UNITS
Our common stock, Class A warrants and units have been trading publicly on
the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the symbols "NTFY," "NTFYW" and "NTFYU,"
respectively, since August 28, 1997. The table below sets forth the range of
quarterly high and low bid prices for our common stock, Class A warrants and
Units on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market during the calendar quarters indicated.
NTFY Common Stock
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 8.438 6.000
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 2.500 0.781
Second Quarter.................................................. 9.250 1.188
Third Quarter................................................... 8.938 6.313
Fourth Quarter.................................................. 8.875 5.656
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 3.750 2.125
Second Quarter.................................................. 2.188 1.625
Third Quarter................................................... 3.875 2.031
Fourth Quarter.................................................. 2.750 0.844
NTFYW Class A Warrants
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 3.063 1.969
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 0.438 0.156
Second Quarter.................................................. 3.313 0.156
Third Quarter................................................... 3.281 1.969
Fourth Quarter.................................................. 3.250 1.656
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- -----
First Quarter................................................... 1.250 0.375
Second Quarter.................................................. 0.750 0.375
Third Quarter................................................... 0.750 0.375
Fourth Quarter.................................................. 0.563 0.156
-11-
<PAGE>
NTFYU Units
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ---- ----
First Quarter............................................... 11.375 8.250
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- ----
First Quarter............................................... 2.750 1.000
Second Quarter.............................................. 12.375 1.438
Third Quarter............................................... 11.875 8.313
Fourth Quarter.............................................. 11.688 6.500
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 HIGH LOW
- ------------------ ----- ----
First Quarter............................................... 5.000 2.500
Second Quarter.............................................. 2.750 2.125
Third Quarter............................................... 4.375 2.250
Fourth Quarter.............................................. 3.000 1.000
As of March 22, 2000, there were 72 holders of record of our common stock
and 9 holders of record of our Class A warrants.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have never paid any cash dividends on our stock and anticipate that, for
the foreseeable future, we will continue to retain any earnings for use in the
operation of our business. Payment of cash dividends in the future will depend
upon our earnings, financial condition, any contractual restrictions,
restrictions imposed by applicable law, capital requirements and other factors
deemed relevant by our board of directors.
-12-
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth below and elsewhere in this prospectus. The following
discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes
thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
Notify Technology Corporation was incorporated in the State of California
in August 1994. We are engaged in the development, manufacture, marketing and
sale of computer telephony products for the business, Small Office Home Office,
or SOHO, and residential marketplaces. In recent years, the number of
individuals and businesses relying on their telephone company service provider
to provide them with services such as voice mail and Centrex, a business-
oriented service that eliminates the need for on-premise telephone switching
equipment, has increased dramatically. Our products are designed to enhance the
convenience and utility of these services by providing customers with features
that are either not available or not included in standard service packages. Our
Call Manager products incorporate caller-id, call waiting caller-id, and Voice
Mail MessageAlert features. Our Centrex Receptionist product gives business and
SOHO customers a cost-effective means of ensuring that incoming calls are
properly routed even when a human attendant is not available. Our newly
announced eLight and eView products provide users with e-mail notification
without the necessity of logging into their mailbox. Our MessageAlert product,
which we have sold over the last three years, is a mature product that is
expected to see limited sales in the future. The MessageAlert is a product that
increases the timeliness and ease of message retrieval for voice mail
subscribers by providing a visual indication that a message has been received.
We completed our IPO in September 1997, with net proceeds of approximately
$6.2 million. Prior to the IPO, our working capital requirements were met
through the sale of equity and debt securities and, to a lesser extent, product
revenue and a line of credit. We have sustained significant operating losses in
every fiscal period since inception and expect to incur substantial quarterly
operating losses in the future. Our limited operating history makes the
prediction of future operating results difficult if not impossible. Future
operating results will depend on many factors, including the demand for our
products, the level of product and price competition, our ability to expand our
existing distribution channels and to create new distribution channels, and our
ability to develop and market new products and control costs. There can be no
assurance that our revenue will grow or be sustained in future periods or that
we will ever achieve profitability.
Results of Operations
Revenue: To date, substantially all of our revenue has been derived from
the sale of our MessageAlert, Centrex Receptionist and Call Manager products.
Revenue consists of gross revenue less product returns. Revenue for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1999 increased to $1,836,142 from $1,638,268 for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. Revenue was up from the previous year due
to the introduction and sales of the Call Manager product and growth in Centrex
Receptionist sales offset by a decline in sales of the MessageAlert product. We
do not expect our MessageAlert products to be a significant source of revenue in
fiscal 2000. We sell products in the United States primarily to regional bell
operating companies and local exchange carriers. Two products accounted for 41%
and 34% of total revenues in fiscal 1999. Another product accounted for 81% of
total revenue in fiscal 1998. Significant portions of our revenue have been
concentrated in a small number of customers although not necessarily the same
customers each year. For example, two customers accounted for 55% and 11% of
sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, and two
-13-
<PAGE>
customers accounted for 50% and 17% of sales for the fiscal year ended September
30, 1998. One of these customers had significant sales in both years.
Sales of the Call Manager product, which began shipping in the third
quarter of fiscal 1999, represented 58% of our revenue in the three month period
ended December 31, 1999. Sales of the Centrex Receptionist represented 27% of
our revenue in the three month period ended December 31, 1999 compared to 75% in
the three month period ended December 31, 1998. Sales of the MessageAlert
product represented 3% of our revenue in the three month period ended December
31, 1999 compared to 21% in the three month period ended December 31, 1998.
Revenue for the three month period ended December 31, 1999 increased to
$1,069,678 from $226,344 for the three month period ended December 31, 1998.
Revenue was up from the previous year primarily due to increased sales of the
Call Manager product line and, to a lessor extent, growth in Centrex
Receptionist sales. Sales to telephone companies were 84% and 78% of revenue for
the three-month periods ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. One
customer accounted for 29% and 72% of sales in the three-month periods ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Two other customers accounted for 24%
and 21% of sales in the three month period ended December 31, 1999.
Most of the Call Manager revenue in the three-month period ended December
31, 1999 was derived from telephone company promotional programs utilizing the
Call Manager product as a customer acquisition device. Conversely, most of the
revenue from the Centrex Receptionist came from continuing, non-promotional
telephone company programs resulting in more consistent sales. As the timing and
size of promotional programs using our Call Manager products is uncertain, we
anticipate we will continue to experience substantial variances in quarterly
revenue.
In addition, we believe that domestic telephone companies have in aggregate
decreased their purchases of telephone adjunct devices aimed solely at Voice
Mail customer acquisition. Based on requests for quotations issued by telephone
companies, we believe that purchases of telephone adjunct devices to support
Caller-ID programs continue to occur. A continuation of this trend would have a
material adverse effect on our Voice Mail-only product business, which would
have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Cost of Sales: Cost of sales consists primarily of the cost to manufacture
our products. Cost of sales increased to $1,721,029 in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999 from $1,582,042 in the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998.
This increase was the result of increased sales of our products for the use in
telephone company promotional programs. Despite significant inventory write-
downs recorded in the third and fourth quarter, our gross margin increased to 6%
in fiscal 1999 from 3% in fiscal 1998. The write-downs were primarily related to
MessageAlert product that has been largely replaced by the Call Manager product
line as well as the write-down of certain Call Manager inventory to the lower of
cost or market due to expedite costs incurred to achieve the initial volume
deployment of the Call Manager product.
Cost of sales increased to $735,445 in the three month period ended
December 31, 1999 from $112,300 for the three month period ended December 31,
1998. This increase was the result of increased sales of the Call Manager
product line.
Research and Development: Research and development expense consists
principally of personnel costs, contract design services, development tooling
and supply expenses. Research and development expense decreased to $1,361,792
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999 from $1,376,767 for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998. This decrease was primarily the result of moving more
development resources in-house versus using contract design services. We expect
to continue to move research and development activity in-house but there can be
no assurance that significant cost savings will be achieved as the result of
such actions.
-14-
<PAGE>
Research and development expense increased to $379,036 for the three month
period ended December 31, 1999 from $327,375 for the three month period ended
December 31, 1998. Research and development cost increases in the three month
period ending December 31, 1999 reflect the growth of our staff that supports
the Got Mail product development.
We expect that research and development expenditures will continue at, or
near, the current level for fiscal 2000 in order that we may complete the
products under development and enhance our current products. See "Business--
Research and Development."
Sales and Marketing: Sales and marketing expense consists primarily of
personnel, consulting and travel costs and sales commissions related to our
sales and marketing efforts. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $837,334
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999 from $589,295 for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998. This increase was attributable primarily to the
expansion of Customer Service, increased travel expense and increased
commissions resulting from increased sales.
Sales and marketing costs increased to $318,386 for the three month period
ended December 31, 1999 from $186,989 for the three month period ended December
31, 1998. This increase was due to an increase in the size of the customer
service department to support the Centrex Receptionist product line and the
addition of a Vice President of Sales and a Vice President of Marketing. We have
been expanding our ability to manage the rollout of the Got Mail product line
and to provide better support for the growing Call Manager and Centrex
Receptionist product lines. We also made a larger investment in promoting our
products at the Consumer Electronics Show held in Las Vegas in January 2000.
We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses will increase significantly
in future quarters as we hire additional sales and customer support personnel
and attempt to expand our existing and create new distribution channels. See
"Business--Sales, Marketing and Distribution."
General and Administrative: General and administrative expense consists of
general management and finance personnel, occupancy costs and professional fees
and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased to $1,136,779 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999 from
$884,442 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. These increases were
primarily the result of additional rent, legal, accounting and corporate expense
and increases in executive salaries. We expect that we will need to hire
additional accounting and financial personnel in order to support anticipated
growth.
General and administrative expenses increased to $363,261 for the three
month period ended December 31, 1999 from $226,287 for the three month period
ended December 31, 1998. The increase is primarily due to the Company's
increased public and investor communication efforts and a rise in recruiting
expenses for senior staff members.
Income Taxes: There was no provision for federal or state income taxes in
fiscal 1998 or 1999 as we incurred net operating losses. As of September 30,
1999, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$16,000,000, which will expire in years 2002 through 2019. The net loss
carryforwards and certain research and development tax credit carryforwards will
expire in tax years 2002 through 2019, if not utilized. Utilization of the net
operating losses and credits may be subject to a substantial annual limitation
due to ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result
in the expiration of net operating losses and credits carryforwards before full
utilization. For financial reporting purposes, deferred tax assets primarily
related to the net operating carryforwards recognized under Financial Accounting
Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," has been fully offset by a
valuation allowance.
-15-
<PAGE>
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our financial statements are prepared and presented on a basis assuming we
continue as a going concern. At September 30, 1999, we had an accumulated
deficit of $9.2 million and incurred a net loss of $3.1 million for fiscal 1999.
Our recently developed products will need to attain favorable market acceptance
to continue our research and development activities and fund operating expenses
at current levels. Management believes that sufficient funds will be available
from cash, cash equivalents, and operating activities to support the current
level of operations through September 30, 2000. There can be no assurance that
our new products will attain favorable market acceptance. If we are unable to
attain certain goals, significant reductions in spending and the delay or
cancellation of planned activities or more substantial restructuring of our
organization may be necessary. In such an event, we intend to implement expense
reduction plans in a timely manner to enable us to meet our cash requirements
through at least September 30, 2000. These actions would have material adverse
effects on our business, results of operations, and prospects.
Over the last two years, we have financed our operations primarily through
sales of equity and debt securities and bank lines of credit. In the fiscal
years ended September 30, 1999 and 1998, the net cash used in operating
activities equaled $2,868,342 and $2,617,101, respectively.
Cash used in operating activities decreased to $612,233 for the three month
period ending December 31, 1999 from $658,243 for the three month period ending
December 31, 1998. Cash used in operating activities for the three month period
ending December 31, 1999 was primarily related to operations as well as an
increase in inventory for the Call Manager product line and an increase in
accounts receivable offset by an increase in accrued liabilities. The cash used
in operating activities for the three month period ended December 31, 1998 was
primarily related to operations.
Cash was provided in the three month period ending December 31, 1999 by
financing activities related primarily to the proceeds of $1,121,760 from the
exercise of warrants to purchase 311,600 shares of common stock. In February
2000, we received an additional $560,880 in proceeds from the exercise of
warrants to purchase 155,800 shares of common stock.
In March 1999, we sold to David Brewer 850,000 shares of common stock and
issued warrants to purchase 1,344,444 shares of common stock for an aggregate
consideration of $3,043,360. The warrants consisted of four warrants to purchase
155,800 shares of common stock at $3.60 per share and one warrant to purchase
721,244 shares of common stock at $3.60 per share. Each of the four warrants
originally expired upon the earlier of September 3, 2000 or 30 days after we
meet certain product sales or revenue milestones. On October 13, 1999, David
Brewer executed two of the warrants for a total of 311,600 shares of common
stock and we received $1.1 million. At the same time, we renegotiated the two
remaining warrants to restate the milestone on one and extend both warrants
until March 1, 2001 or 30 days after we meet certain product sales or revenue
milestones. On December 31, 1999, we achieved an additional milestone and Mr.
Brewer subsequently executed the corresponding warrant in February 2000 for
155,800 shares of common stock and we received $560,880. If we achieve the final
milestone, we anticipate that Mr. Brewer will choose to exercise the warrant and
we will receive as much as $560,880 in additional funding. However, there can be
no assurances that we will meet this last milestone or that Mr. Brewer will, in
fact, exercise the warrant.
In connection with the sale of the common shares and warrants to Mr.
Brewer, we agreed to issue additional warrants to Mr. Brewer if we sell shares
of common stock in a capital raising transaction at a price below $3.60 per
share prior to the earlier of (i) March 3, 2002 or (ii) our calling our
outstanding Class A warrants.
-16-
<PAGE>
Impact of the Year 2000 Issue
The Year 2000 Issue was the result of computer programs being written using
two digits rather than four to define the applicable year. Computer programs
that have date sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year
1900 rather than the year 2000.
We developed a three-phase program to limit or eliminate Y2K exposures.
Phase I was to identify those systems, applications and third-party
relationships that had exposure to Y2K disruptions in operations. Phase II was
the development and implementation of action plans to achieve Y2K compliance in
all areas prior to the end of 1999. Also included in Phase II was the
development of contingency plans that would have been implemented had Y2K
compliance not been achieved in order to minimize disruptions in operations.
Phase III was the final testing or equivalent certification of testing of each
major area of exposure to ensure compliance. We completed all phases before the
end of 1999.
As of December 31, 1999, we identified costs related to replacement or
remediation and testing of our computer information systems and internal
computer and software upgrades to bring the internal systems into compliance
with the Year 2000. The total cost of our Y2K compliance programs was primarily
confined to the replacement of internal personal computers. The funds for these
costs was part of our cash flow from operations and capital expenditures.
No Y2K problems occurred as a result of passing into calendar year 2000. We
have found no evidence of Y2K problems in our internal systems. No users of our
products have yet notified us of any Y2K problems connected with the use of our
products. No vendors have yet informed us of any problems related to Y2K and
deliveries of material to us have not been interrupted. Based on the currently
available information, we do not believe the Year 2000 issue will have a
material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Release of Escrow Securities
In connection with our initial public offering, certain of our
shareholders, including current officers, directors and employees, placed a
substantial portion of our securities then held by them into an escrow. These
securities will be released from escrow if we reach certain pre-tax earnings
targets or share price targets. Upon the release from this escrow of any
securities owned by our officers, directors, consultants or employees, we will
be required to record a compensation expense for financial reporting purposes.
Accordingly, in any period in which securities are released from such escrow, we
will record a substantial noncash charge to earnings that will increase our loss
or reduce or eliminate earnings, if any, at such time. The amount of this charge
will be equal to the aggregate market price of the securities owned by
directors, officers and employees which are released from the escrow. Although
the amount of compensation expense recognized by the us will not affect our
total shareholders' equity or cash flow, it may have a depressive effect on the
market price of our securities. See "Principal Shareholders--Escrow Securities."
-17-
<PAGE>
BUSINESS
We were incorporated in the State of California in August 1994. We are
engaged in the development, manufacture, marketing and sale of computer
telephony products for the business, SOHO and residential marketplaces. In
recent years, the number of individuals and businesses relying on their
telephone company service provider to provide them with services such as voice
mail and Centrex, a business-oriented service that eliminates the need for on-
premise telephone switching equipment, has increased dramatically. Our products
are designed to enhance the convenience and utility of these services by
providing customers with features that are either not available or not included
in standard service packages. Our Call Manager products incorporate caller-id,
call waiting caller-id, and Voice Mail MessageAlert features. Our Centrex
Receptionist product gives business and SOHO customers a cost-effective means of
ensuring that incoming calls are properly routed even when a human attendant is
not available. Our newly announced eLight and eView products provide users with
e-mail notification without the necessity of logging into their mailbox. Also,
our MessageAlert product increases the timeliness and ease of message retrieval
for voice mail subscribers by providing a visual indication that a message has
been received.
Products
Call Manager
We announced the Call Manager family of caller-id products in January 1999
and began shipping in April 1999. Our caller-id products incorporate the
MessageAlert visual message waiting indication technology and support for
combinations of telephone company services such as voice mail, caller-id, call
waiting caller-id and deluxe call waiting. Caller-id products are categorized as
either "Type I" (calling name and calling number only); "Type II" (Type I
features plus call waiting caller-id) or "Type II.5" (Type II plus deluxe call
waiting). Type II and Type II.5 products support the more sophisticated services
offered by telephone service providers than the "Type I" products more commonly
found on the market. Our Call Manager line of products include all three types
and are designed to support bundling of services offered by the telephone
service provider giving more functionality to the end user and more revenue
opportunity for the telephone service provider.
Centrex Receptionist
Small businesses that use CENTREX services generally must maintain a human
attendant to answer incoming calls, or the calls will go unanswered or they will
be transferred into the business' general voice mail mailbox. The Centrex
Receptionist is a stand-alone unit that provides the CENTREX customer with
automatic call answer and transfer capability 24 hours a day. The Centrex
Receptionist provides thirty minutes of recorded announcement time, special
after hours or holiday announcements, and nine main menu items. Each main menu
item supports nine selections that can be either a transfer to a telephone
number or an announcement. The Centrex Receptionist also provides extension
dialing, name directory services and call statistics. The unit has a battery
back-up that will last up to three days. The Centrex Receptionist is remotely
configured by Notify Technology Customer Service but locally programmable by the
user for voice greetings and voice announcements using a touch tone telephone.
It has password protection for all administrative programming. The current
Centrex Receptionist model supports two to four incoming CENTREX lines.
Visual Got Mail
The eView and eLight are the Company's two newest products. The eView and
eLight are part of a Visual Got Mail service that incorporates the use of
proprietary server technology. The service is designed to eliminate residential,
SOHO and business e-mail subscribers' frustration with the traditional,
inconvenient process of checking for e-mail. The Visual Gotmail technology,
designed for telephone company deployment
-18-
<PAGE>
as a service offering, includes a scalable carrier class server infrastructure,
hosted by Notify Technology or the telephone company, and a line of telephone
adjunct products for use by subscribers. While the eLight is a dedicated e-mail
notification product that notifies users of the presence of e-mail through the
use of a blinking red light, the eView is a caller-id product that also
incorporates the advanced e-mail notification feature of displaying the header
information of unread e-mails in the user's mailbox(s).
MessageAlert
The MessageAlert is a visual indicator for telephone company provided voice
mail. Telephone companies typically use one of two signaling standards to alert
voice mail subscribers that they have a message waiting: stutter dial tone
signaling and CLASS signaling, which enables detection of a voice mail message
without taking the line off-hook.
The MessageAlert is a mature product that has limited demand. Although
still in our active product line, the MessageAlert is expected to have limited
sales as it is no longer a featured product in our sales plan. We have been
granted a patent on the MultiSense Technology incorporated in the MessageAlert
that enables it to work with both signaling standards. This technology has been
incorporated into the Call Manager product series and will be included in many
of our other products.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
The sales activities for our products have been focused on direct sales to
large telephone companies. Our products are being either private labeled or
joint marketed by GTE Communication Systems Corporation, Pacific Bell,
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, BellSouth Corporation, Ameritech
Corporation, Century Telephone Enterprises Inc., Alltel Telephone System and
Commonwealth Telephone Company. Except with respect to Pacific Bell,
Southwestern Bell and Ameritech Corporation, our relationship with these
companies has not been reduced to a formal agreement or contract and none of
these companies is obligated to purchase any product from us. We manufacture
products based on purchase orders and forecasts of purchases received from RBOCs
and LECs. We believe large telephone companies typically do business in this
manner and we do not intend to seek long-term contractual commitments from our
telephone company customers.We sell products in the United States primarily to
regional bell operating companies and local exchange carriers. Two products
accounted for 41% and 34% of total revenues in fiscal 1999. Another product
accounted for 81% of total revenue in fiscal 1998. Significant portions of our
revenue have been concentrated in a small number of customers although not
necessarily the same customers each year. For example, two customers accounted
for 55% and 11% of sales for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, and two
customers accounted for 50% and 17% of sales for the fiscal year ended September
30, 1998. One of these customers had significant sales in both years.
We are marketing the Centrex Receptionist to the same group of large
telephone companies we have targeted for the Call Manager, eView and
MessageAlert products. We have entered into contracts with three major telephone
companies to sell our Centrex Receptionist through their ongoing customer
premise equipment channels. We believe that we have established ourselves as a
qualified supplier or joint marketing partner with respect to the Centrex
Receptionist.
We intend to distribute our products through or in conjunction with the
large domestic telephone companies and certain of their authorized resellers. To
date, we have sold our products to five of the seven RBOCs and twelve of the 20
largest LECs. Our strategy is to encourage these telephone companies to bundle
our products with their services as both a consumer acquisition tool and in
order to increase retention of new service subscribers. In addition, we intend
to encourage telephone companies and their authorized resellers that focus on
selling Centrex services to also market our Centrex Receptionist as an
enhancement to the basic
-19-
<PAGE>
Centrex service. We believe that the relationships with telephone companies we
have formed as a result of marketing the MessageAlert, Call Manager and Centrex
Receptionist product lines, will aid us in developing the telephone companies as
a distribution channel for the new Visual Got Mail product line.
The Visual GotMail product line will derive revenue from both sales of
adjunct equipment and supplying ongoing Visual Gotmail services to users.
Service revenue may be direct through our own service centers or indirect
through customer owned and maintained service centers. Our technology is
proprietary and only our adjunct products will interface with the server
centers. We have opened an online store to supply product and Got Mail services
directly to the consumer market. This channel will provide a direct link to the
users of Visual Got Mail service and supply first hand feedback about the
quality of our products and services.
Technical and Marketing Support
We have developed product collateral and marketing programs for the Centrex
Receptionist, Call Manager and MessageAlert products. We have recently expanded
our ongoing marketing programs to include the new Visual GotMail products.
These marketing programs will include augmentation of collateral material,
advertising and trade shows, supplemented with public relations campaigns.
We provide back-up technical support to large telephone companies and
resellers. Our support personnel perform all technical support. In the future,
our support organization will provide both sales and technical support. Sales
support consists of sales and marketing training at our home office training
facility for our own sales force and those of authorized resellers. The Centrex
Receptionist requires remote modem support by our customer service group
whenever the user wants to add lines, make directory changes and perform system
back-up on a billable service arrangement.
Research and Development
We incurred $1,361,792 and $1,376,767 in research and development expenses
in fiscal 1999 and 1998, respectively. We use both internal engineering
resources and contract engineering resources for our research and development.
We believe that our future success, if any, depends significantly on our ability
to continue to enhance our existing products and to develop new products, and
intend to continue to incur continued research and development costs. We expect
that our research and development efforts will be focused in three areas:
further development of the Company's Visual Got Mail products and technology;
cost reduction of the Call Manager product line; and the incorporation of our
technology into complimentary products.
Manufacturing
We use offshore turnkey manufacturing for our production. To the extent
possible, we use standard parts and components for our products although some
components are custom designed and/or are available only from a single source or
limited sources. We have established a relationship with an offshore
manufacturer to design and build low cost Type I caller-id units that we resell
as part of our Call Manager product line. We use a separate manufacturer to
build our Call Manager and Visual Got Mail product lines.
-20-
<PAGE>
Governmental Regulation and Industry Standards
Our products must comply with a variety of regulations and standards
including regulations and standards set by the Federal Communications
Commission, Underwriters Laboratories, National Registered Testing Laboratories,
and Bell Communications Research. As we enter international markets we will be
required to comply with whatever governmental regulations and industry standards
exist in those markets. In addition, the U.S. telecommunications market is
evolving rapidly in part due to recently enacted laws revamping the
telecommunications regulatory structure. Additional legislative or regulatory
changes are possible. Any failure to comply with existing regulations and
standards or to adapt to new regulations and standards could have a material
adverse effect on our business and operating results.
Competition
We currently have several direct competitors in the market for caller-id
units. CIDCO Incorporated, TT Systems, Astra Telecom of Canada and Thompson
Consumer Inc. produce Type I and Type II caller-id products and have been
selling their products for a number of years into the marketplace. Since we have
more recently entered this marketplace, our products rely on increased or unique
functionality to gain market share. We have also had to use aggressive pricing
in some cases to deploy sufficient quantities of product to establish adequate
reliability statistics to qualify for larger programs with our telephone company
customers. We believe that our Call Manager products compete favorably with
respect to other caller-id products currently being offered on the market.
Certain manufacturers of caller-id products have greater financial,
technical and marketing resources than we do. In addition, there are several
companies with substantially greater technical, financial and marketing
resources than we do that could produce competing products.
We have one direct competitor in the market for Centrex auto-attendant
products. SoloPoint.com, Inc. produces both a model A200 and model A400 auto-
attendant product. Solopoint's products lack many of the features found in our
Centrex Receptionist product such as: three levels of menus, 30 minute of voice
recording, a 200 entry name directory and several call statistics reports. To
our knowledge, Solopoint has failed to attract any major RBOC's to distribute
their product. Currently, we have three major RBOC's with signed agreements
selling our Centrex Receptionist product line with other RBOC's evaluating the
product. The Company believes competition in the auto-attendant market is based
on features (including ease of use, availability of a name directory, amount of
recording time and number of menu levels), price and quality. The Company
believes it competes favorably with respect to all of these factors.
We believe that we do not currently have any direct domestic competition
for our Visual GotMail technology. There are several indirect competitors that
include Landel Telecom and CIDCO Incorporated. These companies produce products
that provide e-mail notification as well as limited e-mail access. All of these
products require a relatively expensive device that consists of a multi-line
character display and a keyboard. We believe our Visual Got Mail technology
competes favorably with respect to any of these indirectly competing products.
Our MessageAlert product has several direct competitors in the voice mail
waiting indication marketplace. Comsumerware Inc. produces a product called
Voice Mail Lite and Solopoint.com, Inc. produces a S25 Message Waiting Light.
Both of these products provide stutter dial tone and FSK message waiting
indication. We believe our MessageAlert 300 product competes favorably with
respect to either of these competitive products.
-21-
<PAGE>
We expect that to the extent that the market for any of our products
develops, competition will intensify and new competitors will enter the market.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against
existing and new competitors as the market for our products evolves and the
level of competition increases. A failure to compete successfully against
existing and new competitors would have a materially adverse effect upon our
business and results of operations.
Proprietary Rights
We rely on a combination of patent and trade secret law, nondisclosure
agreements and technical measures to establish and protect our proprietary
rights in our products. We have a design patent issued on the MessageAlert
design. The MessageAlert design is unique in that it provides a visual message
waiting indicator light packaged in the form of a 3M Post- it(R) Note holder. In
addition, we were granted a patent in October 1998 relating to the MultiSense
technology used in the MessageAlert product. Our MultiSense technology
automatically detects and reacts to either stutter or CLASS signaling. We also
have patents pending on our Visual Got Mail technology and other technology
under development. We intend to continue to apply for patents, as appropriate,
for our future technologies and products.
There are few barriers to entry into the market for our products, and there
can be no assurance that any patents applied for by us will be granted or that
the scope of our patent or any patents granted in the future will be broad
enough to protect against the use of similar technologies by our competitors.
There can be no assurance, therefore, that any of our competitors, some of whom
have far greater resources than we do, will not independently develop
technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology.
Further, we intend to distribute our products in a number of foreign countries.
The laws of those countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same
extent as the laws of the United States.
We may be involved from time to time in litigation to determine the
enforceability, scope and validity of any of our proprietary rights or of third
parties asserting infringement claims against us. Any such litigation could
result in substantial costs to us and diversion of efforts by our management and
technical personnel.
We have entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with Active Voice
Corporation pursuant to which we have paid an up-front fee on sales of our
products in exchange for certain rights with respect to a patent issued to
Active Voice Corporation covering stutter dial tone detection.
Employees
As of March 1, 2000, we employed thirty-one persons of whom eleven were
engaged in research and development, two in manufacturing, thirteen in sales,
marketing, and customer support, and five in general administration and finance.
Twenty-eight of our employees work full time. We contemplate increasing our
staff at a pace consistent with our business and growth. None of our employees
are currently represented by a labor union. We consider our relations with our
employees to be good.
Our success, if any, will be dependent on our ability to attract and retain
highly skilled technical personnel as well as marketing and sales personnel. If
we are unable to hire the necessary personnel, the development of new products
and enhancements to current products would likely be delayed or prevented.
Competition for highly-skilled technical, managerial, sales, and marketing
personnel is intense. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
retaining our key personnel and in attracting and retaining the personnel we
require for expansion.
-22-
<PAGE>
Facilities
Our principal executive offices are located at 1054 South DeAnza Boulevard,
Suite 105, San Jose, California 95129. These facilities consist of approximately
5,000 square feet of office space pursuant to a lease that expires March 31,
2001. We have a second location at 23 Lisbon Street, Canfield, Ohio 44406 that
houses an engineering group and customer support for the Eastern United States.
The Ohio facility consists of approximately 1,500 square feet of office space
leased on a month to month basis. We will either renew our leases and acquire
more space if available or enter into a lease for new premises in the local
areas.
How To Get Information About Notify Technology Corporation
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act and
therefore file reports, proxy and information statements and other information
with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the
SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC's Internet
website is http://www.sec.gov.
-23-
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
The executive officers and directors of Notify Technology Corporation, and
their ages as of February 20, 2000, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Position
- -------------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Paul F. DePond(1)..................... 46 President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors
Gaylan I. Larson...................... 59 Vice President of Operations and Director
Gerald W. Rice........................ 52 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Dane Russell.......................... 47 Vice President of Sales
Maurice Hamoy ........................ 50 Vice President of Marketing
Michael Ballard(1)(2)................. 44 Director
Andrew Plevin(2)...................... 35 Director
David Brewer.......................... 48 Director
</TABLE>
(1) Member of Compensation Committee
(2) Member of Audit Committee
Paul F. DePond, founder of Notify Technology Corporation, has served as our
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors since
its inception in August 1994. Mr. DePond also sits on the board of directors of
gForce Systems, a company located in San Jose, CA. From September 1992 through
May 1994, Mr. DePond served as Vice President Corporate Marketing of Telebit
Corporation, a supplier of high speed modems and dialup remote access products.
From January 1991 through September 1992, Mr. DePond served as Vice President,
Marketing, of Alantec Corporation, a manufacturer of networking products. Mr.
DePond received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering in
1979, and an M.A. in Computer Science in 1980, each from the University of
Michigan at Ann Arbor.
Gaylan I. Larson has served as our Vice President of Operations and as one
of our directors since August 1994. From January 1991 to August 1994, Mr. Larson
was Chief Operating Officer of SportSense, Inc., a manufacturer of golf training
equipment. Prior to SportSense, Mr. Larson served as General Manager of the Data
Systems Division of Hewlett-Packard Company, a company with which he had an 18
year relationship. Mr. Larson received an A.A. from Sacramento Junior College in
1959, a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of California, Berkeley
in 1961, and a M.S.E.E. in Engineering from Newark College of Engineering in
1965.
Gerald W. Rice has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
since August 1994. From November 1993 to June 1996, he owned Comprehensive
Business Services, a financial services company franchise. From April 1992 to
April 1993, Mr. Rice served as Controller at Surface Science Instruments, a
manufacturer of capital equipment for surface chemical analysis. From June 1990
to April 1992 Mr. Rice was Vice President of Finance and Secretary of Applied
Dielectrics, a manufacturer of microwave circuit boards. Mr. Rice received an
A.A. from Ohlone Community College in 1969 and a B.A. in Accounting from
California State College of Stanislaus in 1971.
Dane J. Russell, recently appointed VP of Sales for the Company November 1,
1999. From August 1998 through October 1999, Mr. Russell served as Worldwide
Director of H.323 (VoIP) Sales, at Lucent Technologies, elemedia venture. From
August 1996 through August 1998, Mr. Russell served as National OEM Sales
Manager at Cypress Research, a PC based telephony software venture company. From
June 1984 to June 1996, Mr. Russell held various Sales and Sales Management
positions with 3M's Data Storage Products Division. Mr. Russell received a B.S.
in Business Administration in 1980, and an M.B.A. in 1982, each from California
State University, Hayward.
-24-
<PAGE>
Maurice J. Hamoy has served as Vice President of Marketing of the Company
since November 1999. From February 1998 to October 1999, Mr. Hamoy was Vice
President of Communications at Storactive, Inc., a developer of enterprise
storage management products. From October 1995 to February 1998, Mr. Hamoy was
Vice President of Marketing at Software Publishing Corporation, the developer of
the Harvard Graphics presentation software. Prior to Software Publishing
Corporation, Mr. Hamoy served, over a ten-year period, in several senior
management positions at Inset Systems, Inc., a privately held graphics company
that pioneered the use of graphics on the Internet. Mr. Hamoy studied education
and psychology from 1966 to 1968 at Goddard College, and majored in psychology
at Queens College of the City University of New York from 1968 to 1973.
Michael Ballard has served as one of our directors since January 1996. Mr.
Ballard is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Savannah
Chanel Vineyards, Inc. From October 1996 to November 1997, Mr. Ballard directed
the dial-up technology division of Cisco Systems, Inc. From May 1995 to October
1996, Mr. Ballard served as Executive Vice President Marketing of Telebit
Corporation. From June 1993 to September 1994, Mr. Ballard served as Chief
Operating Officer of UUNet, Inc., an internet service provider. From January
1986 to May 1993, Mr. Ballard held several positions including Chief Executive
Officer of Telebit Corporation. Mr. Ballard received his B.F.A. in 1978 from the
University of Utah.
Andrew Plevin was elected as one of our directors in February 1998. Since
November 1997, Mr. Plevin has been acting Chief Executive Officer and President
of Core Software Technology, Inc. From August 1993 to November 1997, Mr. Plevin
served as Vice President of D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp. Mr. Plevin was
nominated to the board of directors pursuant to a requirement contained in the
underwriting agreement between Notify Technology and D.H. Blair Investment
Banking Corp. for our initial public offering. The provision provides that D.H.
Blair Investment Banking Corp. shall have the right to designate one director of
our board of directors for a period of five years from the closing date of our
initial public offering.
David Brewer was elected as one of our directors in February 2000. Since
January 1999, he has served as general manager for Aragon Ventures LLC, a
private equity investment firm. From November 1999 to present, Mr. Brewer has
served as Chief Executive Officer of Explore Holdings LLC, a private equity
investment firm, and from July 1995 to present he has served as a managing
member of Inktomi LLC, an internet research company. From September 1995 to
December 1999, Mr. Brewer served as President, Chief Executive Officer and
director of Explore Technologies, Inc., an educational toy manufacturer. From
February 1996 to May 1996, Mr. Brewer served as President, Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and director of Inktomi Corporation, an
internet software developer. Mr. Brewer was nominated for election to the board
of directors pursuant to a requirement contained in a securities purchase
agreement between us and Mr. Brewer, dated March 4, 1999.
All directors are elected annually and serve until the next annual meeting
of shareholders or until the election and qualification of their successors. All
executive officers serve at the discretion of our board of directors. There are
no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers.
Our success, if any, will be dependent to a significant extent upon certain
key management employees, including Messrs. DePond and Larson. We have 3-year
key-man term life insurance on Mr. DePond in the amount of $2 million and have
entered into employment agreements with him and with Messrs. Larson, and Rice.
See "Employment Contracts."
-25-
<PAGE>
Director Compensation
Members of our board of directors do not receive compensation for their
services as directors.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation
awarded to, earned by, or paid for services rendered to us in all capacities
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999, by (1) our Chief Executive
Officer and (2) our most highly compensated executive officers whose salary and
bonus for the year exceeded $100,000.
Summary Compensation Table
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Long-Term Compensation
-------------------------------------
Annual Compensation Awards Payouts
- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ----------
Restricted Securities
Other Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other
Name and Salary Bonus Compensation Awards(s) Options Payouts Compensation
Principal Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) (#) ($) ($)(1)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Paul F. DePond....... 1999 166,531 -- -- -- -- -- 7,116
Chief Executive 1998 132,739 -- -- -- -- -- 7,950
Officer 1997 121,381 -- -- -- -- -- 8,673
Gaylan Larson........ 1999 116,500 -- -- -- -- -- 6,346
Chief Operations 1998 115,585 -- -- -- -- -- 6,138
Officer 1997 112,446 -- -- -- -- -- 7,518
Gerald Rice.......... 1999 116,207 -- -- -- -- -- 8,401
Chief Financial 1998 105,759 -- -- -- -- -- 6,562
Officer 1997 95,519 -- -- -- 24,752 -- 6,886
</TABLE>
____________________
(1) Represents payments of health insurance premiums on behalf of the named
executive officers.
-26-
<PAGE>
The following tables set forth information for the named executive officers
with respect to grants and exercises in fiscal 1999 of options to purchase
common stock. All options were granted under our 1997 Stock Plan.
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of % of Total
Securities Options Granted
Underlying to Employees in Exercise or
Name Options Granted (#) Fiscal Year Base Price ($/Sh) Expiration Date
- ------------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Paul F. DePond....................... -- -- -- --
Gaylan Larson........................ -- -- -- --
Gerald Rice.......................... -- -- -- --
</TABLE>
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option
Values
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Securities Value of Unexercised
Shares Value Underlying Options at Fiscal In-the-Money Options at
Acquired on Realized Year End (#) Fiscal Year End (1)($)
Name Exercises (#) ($). Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
- ----------------------------------- ------------- -------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Paul F. DePond..................... -- -- 110,792 -- 576,230 --
Gaylan Larson...................... -- -- -- -- -- --
Gerald Rice........................ -- -- 25,752 -- 65,766 --
</TABLE>
_____________________
(1) Market value of underlying securities at fiscal year-end of $7.656 minus
exercise price multiplied by the number of shares.
1997 Stock Plan
The 1997 plan provides for the granting to employees of incentive stock
options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, and for the granting to employees and consultants of nonstatutory
stock options and stock purchase rights. The 1997 plan was approved by the board
of directors and the shareholders in January 1997. Unless terminated sooner, the
1997 plan will terminate automatically in January 2007. Under the 1997 plan, we
may grant options to purchase up to 700,000 shares of our common stock. As of
March 1, 2000, we had granted options to purchase an aggregate of 430,618 shares
of our common stock and 269,382 shares of our common stock remained reserved for
future grants.
The 1997 plan may be administered by the board of directors or a committee
of the board, which committee shall, in the case of options intended to qualify
as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code, consist of two or more outside directors within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The exercise price of
incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock
options and stock purchase rights granted under the 1997 plan is determined by
the committee, but with respect to nonstatutory stock options intended to
qualify as "performance-based compensation" within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code, the exercise price must at least be equal to the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. With respect to any
participant who owns stock possessing more than 10% of the voting power of all
classes of our outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any incentive
stock option granted must equal at least 110% of the fair market value on the
grant date and the term of the incentive stock option must not exceed five
years. The term of all other options granted under the 1997 plan may not exceed
ten years.
The 1997 plan provides that in the event of our merger with or into another
corporation, a sale of substantially all of our assets or a like transaction
involving us, each option shall be assumed or an equivalent option substituted
by the successor corporation. If the outstanding options are not assumed or
substituted as described
-27-
<PAGE>
in the preceding sentence, the committee shall provide for each optionee to have
the right to exercise the option or stock purchase right as to all of the
optioned stock, including shares as to which it would not otherwise be
exercisable. If the administrator makes an option or stock purchase right
exercisable in full in the event of a merger or sale of assets, the
administrator shall notify the optionee that the option or stock purchase right
shall be fully exercisable for a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of
the notice, and the option or stock purchase right will terminate upon the
expiration of such period.
Employment Contracts
In August 1997, we entered into an employment agreement with Paul DePond,
our President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides for a base
salary of $130,000, which increased to $150,000 thirteen months following our
initial public offering, and a $50,000 bonus contingent on our attainment of
certain performance milestones. This employment agreement was amended in
February 2000 to increase Mr. DePond's base salary to $175,000. In addition, if
we are sold while Mr. DePond is employed by us, Mr. DePond will receive a bonus
equal to 2% of the price at which we are sold.
In the event that we terminate Mr. DePond without cause following a change
in control, Mr. DePond is entitled to receive severance compensation equal to a
continuation of his salary for a period of twenty-four (24) months. In the event
that we terminate Mr. DePond without cause apart from a change of control, Mr.
DePond is entitled to receive severance compensation equal to a continuation of
his salary for a period of eighteen (18) months. Mr. DePond is not entitled to
severance compensation in the event of a termination for cause or voluntary
resignation. In the event of a termination due to disability, Mr. DePond is
entitled to receive only those severance or disability benefits as are
established under our then existing severance and benefits plans and policies.
In August 1997, we entered into employment agreements with Mr. Larson, our
Vice President of Operations and Mr. Rice, our Chief Financial Officer. These
employment agreements were amended in February 2000. The agreements provide for
base salaries of $145,000 and $130,000 for Messrs. Larson and Rice,
respectively. Under the agreements, Messrs. Larson and Rice are eligible to
receive annual bonuses based on an earnings target approved by our board of
directors.
In the event that we terminate Messrs. Larson or Rice without cause
following a change in control, the terminated officer is entitled to receive
severance compensation equal to a continuation of his salary for a period of
twelve (12) months. In the event that we terminate Messrs. Larson or Rice
without cause apart from a change of control, the terminated officer is entitled
to receive severance compensation equal to a continuation of his salary for a
period of six (6) months. Messrs. Larson and Rice are not entitled to severance
compensation in the event of a termination for cause or voluntary resignation.
In the event of a termination due to disability, the terminated officer is
entitled to receive only those severance or disability benefits as are
established under our then existing severance and benefits plans and policies.
The foregoing agreements define a "change in control" as (1) the
acquisition of more than 30% of the voting securities of Notify Technology
Corporation by any person or group; (2) a change in a majority of our board of
directors occurring within a two-year period; or (3) the approval by our
shareholders of a transaction which would result in a transfer of more than 50%
of our voting power provided, however, that a public offering of our common
stock does not constitute a change of control. Messrs. DePond, Rice and Larson
have also agreed that the acquisition of shares and warrants by David Brewer
does not constitute a "change in control." The agreements define "cause" as an
act of dishonesty in connection with employment; a conviction of a felony which
will detrimentally affect our reputation or business; willful and gross
misconduct injurious to us; and continued and willful failure to perform duties.
The agreements define "disability" as the inability to perform
-28-
<PAGE>
duties under the agreement due to mental or physical illness determined to be
total and permanent by a physician.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers and Related Matters
We have adopted provisions in our Articles of Incorporation that eliminate
the personal liability of our directors for monetary damages arising from a
breach of their fiduciary duties in certain circumstances to the fullest extent
permitted by law and authorizes us to indemnify our directors and officers to
the fullest extent permitted by law. This limitation of liability does not
affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or
rescission.
Our bylaws provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers to
the fullest extent permitted by California law. We have entered into
indemnification agreements with our officers and directors containing provisions
which are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions
contained in the California Corporations Code. The indemnification agreements
may require us, among other things, to indemnify these officers and directors
against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service
as directors or officers, except for liabilities arising from willful misconduct
of a culpable nature, and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any
proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.
At present, there is no pending material litigation or proceeding involving
any of our directors or officers where indemnification may be required or
permitted. We are not aware of any threatened material litigation or proceeding
which may result in a claim for indemnification.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of us pursuant
to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that it is the
opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission that such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore
unenforceable.
-29-
<PAGE>
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
We had a business relationship with COMAC, a literature and product
fulfillment company previously owned by Michael Smith. Mr. Smith currently
serves as the president of COMAC, a subsidiary of Pierce Leahy Corp. We use
COMAC, along with other fulfillment companies, on a project by project basis to
facilitate the distribution of our products to telephone company customers. We
have no contractual obligation to use COMAC's services. During fiscal years
ended September 30, 1998 and September 30, 1999, we paid to COMAC $61,000 and
$3,911, respectively, in fees.
From August 1993 to November 1997, Mr. Andrew Plevin, a member of our board
of directors, served as Vice President of D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.
D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp. served as placement agent for our 1997
bridge financing and as underwriter for our initial public offering. In
connection with the 1997 bridge financing and our initial public offering, D.H.
Blair Investment Banking Corp. received approximately $1,150,000 in discounts,
commission, and non-accountable expense allowances. In addition, D.H. Blair
Investment Banking Corp. received an option to purchase 160,000 of the units
offered in our initial public offering, at $7.00 per unit, exercisable at any
time, in whole or in part, during the two year period commencing August 28,
2000. Each unit offered in our initial public offering consisted of a share of
common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise
price of $6.50 per share.
In March 1999, we sold to David A. Brewer in a private placement 850,000
shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,334,444 shares of common stock
for aggregate consideration of $3,043,360. The warrants consisted of four
warrants to purchase 155,800 share of common stock at $3.60 per share and one
warrant to purchase 721,244 shares of common stock at $3.60 per share. Mr.
Brewer exercised two of the four warrants on October 11, 1999 and received
311,600 shares of common stock underlying such warrants for an aggregate
exercise price of $1,121,760. At the same time, we renegotiated the two
remaining warrants to restate the milestone on one and extend both warrants
until March 1, 2001 or 30 days after we meet certain product sales or revenue
milestones. On December 31, 1999, we achieved an additional milestone and Mr.
Brewer subsequently executed the corresponding warrant in February 2000 for
155,800 shares of common stock and we received $560,880. The fifth warrant
expires on March 3, 2003 and contains a net exercise provision. In connection
with the sale of the common stock and warrants to Mr. Brewer, we agreed to issue
additional warrants to Mr. Brewer if we sell shares of common stock in a capital
raising transaction at price below $3.60 per share prior to the earlier of (1)
March 3, 2002 or (2) our calling our outstanding Class A warrants. In addition,
we agreed to register for resale the common stock sold in the private placement
and the common stock underlying the warrants at the request of Mr. Brewer which
may be made at any time after June 3, 1999. We also agreed to seek shareholder
approval to increase the size of our board of directors and to elect Mr. Brewer
to our board of directors. Mr. Brewer was elected to our board of directors at
the Annual Shareholders Meeting held on February 23, 2000.
We believe that all of the transactions set forth above were made on terms
no less favorable to us than could have been obtained from unaffiliated third
parties. All future transactions, including loans, between us and our officers,
directors and principal shareholders and their affiliates will be approved by a
majority of the board of directors, including a majority of the independent and
disinterested outside directors of the board of directors, and will be on terms
no less favorable to us than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
-30-
<PAGE>
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership
of our common stock as of March 1, 2000, (1) by each person (or group of
affiliated persons) who is known by us to own beneficially more than five
percent of our common stock, (2) by each of the Named Executive Officers, (3) by
each of our directors, and (4) by all of our directors and executive officers as
a group. We believe that the persons and entities named in the table have sole
voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where
applicable.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Shares Beneficially Owned(1) Percentage (1)
- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
David A. Brewer(2)(3)(4)........................................... 2,239,745 38.8%
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
Paul F. DePond(5).................................................. 519,508 10.4
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
J. Morton Davis(6)................................................. 288,704 5.7
c/o D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.
44 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
Gaylan I. Larson(7)................................................ 200,796 4.1
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
Andrew Plevin(8)................................................... 133,100 2.7
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
Gerald W. Rice(9).................................................. 96,835 2.0
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
Michael Ballard(10)................................................ 71,905 1.5
c/o Notify Technology Corporation
1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105
San Jose, California 95129
All directors and executive officers as a group(8 persons)(11)..... 3,261,889 53.9
- ---------------------------
</TABLE>
- ---------------------------
(1) Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 4,878,364 shares of common
stock outstanding as of March 1, 2000 together with applicable options or
warrants for the shareholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in
accordance with the rules of the Securities Exchange Commission, and
includes voting and investment power with respect to shares. Shares of
common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days after March 1, 2000 are deemed outstanding for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding
options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the
percentage of any other stockholder.
(2) Includes 877,044 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants.
(3) Includes 19,801 shares of common stock owned by Hanabusa Investments, Inc.,
of which Mr. Brewer is a shareholder.
(4) Includes 12,500 shares of common stock and 13,000 shares issuable upon
exercise of currently exercisable warrants owned by JBB Associates, of
which Mr. Brewer is a shareholder.
(5) Includes 110,792 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants. Also includes 2,777 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2000.
(6) Information provided is based solely on J. Morton Davis's Schedule 13G
dated February 12, 1999. Mr. Davis claims sole voting power as to 72,000
shares. Mr. Davis may be deemed to beneficially own 288,704 shares as
follows: (1) 36,000 shares and 36,000 shares underlying currently
exercisable warrants owned directly by D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.,
of which Mr. Davis is the sole shareholder, and (2) 108,352 shares and
108,352 shares underlying currently exercisable warrants owned by Mr.
-31-
<PAGE>
Davis's wife, Rosalind Davidowitz. Mr. Davis disclaimed beneficial
ownership of all securities held by Mrs. Davidowitz pursuant to Rule 13d-4
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on the Schedule 13G
dated February 12, 1999.
(7) Includes 2,777 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable within
60 days of March 1, 2000.
(8) Includes 4,250 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants. Also includes (1) 64,000 shares issuable upon exercise of a
currently exercisable option to purchase 64,000 of our units, each of which
consists of one share of common stock and one of our Class A warrants, and
(2) 64,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the Class A warrants that
underlie the option to purchase Units.
(9) Includes 24,752 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants. Also includes 2,777 shares subject to stock options that are
exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2000.
(10) Includes 9,498 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants.
(11) Includes 1,039,336 shares issuable upon exercise of currently exercisable
warrants and 8,331 shares subject to stock options that are exercisable
within 60 days of March 1, 2000. Also includes (1) 64,000 shares issuable
upon exercise of a currently exercisable option to purchase 64,000 of our
units, each of which consists of one share of common stock and one of our
Class A warrants, and (2) 64,000 shares issuable upon exercise of the Class
A warrants that underlie the option to purchase Units.
Escrow Securities
In connection with our initial public offering, the holders of our common
stock and warrants to purchase common stock placed 1,242,985 shares of our
common stock (the "Escrow Shares") and warrants to purchase 126,759 shares of
common stock (the "Escrow Warrants" and, together with the Escrow Shares, the
"Escrow Securities") into escrow pursuant to an escrow agreement ("Escrow
Agreement") with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer and Trust, as
escrow agent. The Escrow Securities are not assignable or transferable; however,
the Escrow Shares may be voted. Holders of any Escrow Warrants in escrow may
exercise their warrants prior to their release from escrow; however, the shares
issuable upon any such exercise will continue to be held in escrow as Escrow
Shares pursuant to the Escrow Agreement.
The Escrow Agreement provides that one-half of the Escrow Securities (i.e.
684,872 shares of issued or issuable common stock) will be released from escrow,
on a pro rata basis, if, and only if, one or more of the following conditions
are met:
1. our net income before provision for income taxes and exclusive of any
extraordinary earnings as audited and determined by our independent public
accountants (the "Minimum Pretax Income") amounts to at least $1.8 million for
the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998 or September 30, 1999;
2. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $3.0 million for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2000;
3. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $4.5 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2001;
4. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $5.9 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2002;
5. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $8.9 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2003;
6. commencing on August 28, 1997 and ending 18 months thereafter, the bid
price of our common stock averages in excess of $12.00 per share (subject to
adjustment in the event of any reverse stock splits or other similar events) for
30 consecutive business days;
7. commencing 18 months after August 28, 1997 and ending 36 months
thereafter, the bid price averages in excess of $15.00 per share (subject to
adjustment in the event of any reverse stock splits or other similar events) for
30 consecutive business days; or
-32-
<PAGE>
8. we are acquired by or merged into another entity in a transaction in
which our shareholders receive per share consideration at least equal to the
level set forth in (6) above.
The Escrow Agreement further provides that the remaining Escrow
Securities (i.e. 684,872 shares of issued or issuable shares of common stock)
will be released from escrow, on a pro rata basis, if, and only if, one or
more of the following conditions is met:
1. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $3.0 million for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 1998 or September 30, 1999;
2. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $4.5 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2000;
3. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $5.9 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2001;
4. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $8.9 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2002;
5. the Minimum Pretax Income amounts to at least $10.4 million for the
fiscal year ending on September 30, 2003;
6. commencing on August 28, 1997 and ending 18 months thereafter, the bid
price of our common stock averages in excess of $13.30 per share (subject to
adjustment in the event of any reverse stock splits or other similar events) for
30 consecutive business days;
7. commencing 18 months after August 28, 1997 and ending 36 months
thereafter, the bid price averages in excess of $16.75 per share (subject to
adjustment in the event of any reverse stock splits or other similar events) for
30 consecutive business days; or
8. we are acquired by or merged into another entity in a transaction in
which our shareholders receive per share consideration at least equal to the
level set forth in (6) above.
The Minimum Pretax Income amounts set forth above (i) shall be calculated
exclusive of any extraordinary earnings, including, but not limited to, any
charge to income resulting from release of the Escrow Securities and (ii) shall
be increased proportionately, with certain limitations, in the event additional
shares of common stock or securities convertible into, exchangeable for or
exercisable into common stock are issued after completion of our initial public
offering. The foregoing Minimum Pretax Income amounts have been adjusted to
reflect the effect of the share issuances to David A. Brewer. The bid price
amounts set forth above are subject to adjustment in the event of any stock
splits, reverse stock splits, reverse stock splits or other similar events.
Any money, securities, rights or property distributed in respect of the
Escrow Securities, including any property distributed as dividends or pursuant
to any stock split, merger, recapitalization, dissolution, or total or partial
liquidation of us, shall be held in escrow until release of the Escrow
Securities. If none of the applicable Minimum Pretax Income or bid price levels
set forth above have been met by December 31, 2003, the Escrow Securities, as
well as any dividends or other distributions made with respect thereto, will be
canceled and contributed to our capital. We expect that the release of the
Escrow Securities to its officers, directors, employees and consultants, if it
occurs, will be deemed compensatory and, accordingly, will result in a
substantial charge to reportable earnings, which would equal the fair market
value of such shares on the date of
-33-
<PAGE>
release. Such charge could substantially increase the loss or reduce or
eliminate our net income for financial reporting purposes for the period or
periods during which such shares are, or become probable of being, released from
escrow. Although the amount of compensation expense recognized by us will not
affect our total shareholders' equity, it may have a negative effect on the
market price of our securities.
The Minimum Pretax Income and bid price levels set forth above were
determined by negotiation between us and D. H. Blair & Co. and should not be
construed to imply or predict our future earnings or any increase in the market
price of our securities.
-34-
<PAGE>
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Common Stock
We have authorized 15,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held
of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the shareholders. Subject to
preferences that may be applicable to any shares of preferred stock issued in
the future, holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such
dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally
available therefor. See "Dividend Policy." In the event of a liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of Notify Technology Corporation, holders of the
common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment
of liabilities and the liquidation preference of any then outstanding preferred
stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to
convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares
of common stock are, and all shares of common stock to be outstanding upon
completion of the offering contemplated hereby, will be fully paid and
nonassessable.
Class A Warrants
The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Class A
warrants, but such summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in
all respects by reference to the actual text of the warrant agreement, dated
August 28, 1997 between us and D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp. (the "Warrant
Agreement"). A copy of the Warrant Agreement has been filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part.
Class A Warrants
The holder of each Class A warrant is entitled, upon payment of the
exercise price of $6.50, to purchase one share of common stock. Unless
previously redeemed, the Class A warrants are exercisable at any time after
issuance through August 28, 2002, provided that at such time a current
prospectus relating to the underlying common stock is in effect and the
underlying common stock is qualified for sale or exempt from qualification under
applicable state securities laws. The Class A warrants included in the Units are
immediately transferable separately from the common stock issued with such Class
A warrants as part of the Units.
Redemption
Commencing on the first anniversary of the effective date of the
Registration Statement, of which this Prospectus is a part, the Class A warrants
became subject to redemption by the Registrant, upon 30 days written notice, at
a price of $.05 per warrant, if the average closing bid price of the common
stock for any 30 consecutive trading days ending within 15 days of the date on
which the notice of redemption is given shall have exceeded $9.10 per share.
Holders of Class A warrants will automatically forfeit their rights to purchase
the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants unless the
warrants are exercised before the close of business on the business day
immediately prior to the date set for redemption. All of the outstanding
warrants of a class, except for those underlying the Unit Purchase Option, must
be redeemed if any of that class are redeemed. A notice of redemption shall be
mailed to each of the registered holders of the Class A warrants by first class
mail, postage prepaid, upon 30 days' notice before the date fixed for
redemption.
-35-
<PAGE>
General
The Class A warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the certificate or
certificates therefor on or prior to the expiration or the redemption date (as
explained above) at the offices of our warrant agent (the "Warrant Agent") with
the Subscription Form on the reverse side of the certificate or certificates
completed and executed as indicated, accompanied by payment (in the form of a
certified or cashier's check payable to the order of the Registrant) of the full
exercise price for the number of Class A warrants being exercised.
The Class A warrants contain provisions that protect the holders thereof
against dilution by adjustment of the exercise price per share and the number of
shares issuable upon exercise thereof upon the occurrence of certain events,
including issuances of common stock (or securities convertible, exchangeable or
exercisable into common stock) at less than market value, stock dividends, stock
splits, mergers, sale of substantially all of our assets, and for other
extraordinary events; provided, however, that no such adjustment shall be made
upon, among other things, (i) the issuance or exercise of options or other
securities under the Stock Option Plan or other employee benefit plans or (ii)
the sale or exercise of outstanding options or warrants or the Class A warrants
offered hereby.
We are not required to issue fractional shares of common stock, and in lieu
thereof will make a cash payment based upon the current market value of such
fractional shares. The holder of the Class A warrants will not possess any
rights as a shareholder of the Registrant unless and until he exercises the
Class A warrants.
Upon notice to the Warrant Holders, we have the right to reduce the
exercise price or extend the expiration date of the Class A warrants.
Current Prospectus and State Registration Required to Exercise or Sell Warrants
Holders of Class A warrants will be able to sell or exercise the Class A
warrants only if a current prospectus relating to the Class A warrants or shares
underlying the Class A warrants is then in effect under the Securities Act and
such securities are qualified for sale or exempt from qualification under the
applicable securities or "blue sky" laws of the states in which the various
holders of the Class A warrants then reside. Although we have undertaken to use
reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of a current prospectus
covering the Class A warrants and the shares of common stock underlying the
Class A warrants, no assurance can be given that we will be able to do so. The
value of the Class A warrants may be greatly reduced if a current prospectus
covering the Class A warrants and the shares issuable upon the exercise of the
Class A warrants is not kept effective or if such Class A warrants or shares are
not qualified or exempt from qualification in the states in which the holders of
the Class A warrants then reside.
Preferred Stock
We have authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Shares of preferred
stock may be issued without shareholder approval. The board of directors is
authorized to issue such shares in one or more series and to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges, qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof,
including dividend rights and rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of
redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares
constituting any series or the designation of such series, without any vote or
action by the shareholders. No shares of preferred stock are currently
outstanding, and we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred
stock. Any preferred stock to be issued could rank prior to the common stock
with respect to dividend rights and rights on liquidation. Our board of
directors, without shareholder approval, may issue preferred stock with voting
and conversion rights which could adversely affect the voting power of holders
of common stock and discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of Notify
Technology Corporation.
-36-
<PAGE>
Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, New York, New York, serves as
transfer agent for the shares of common stock and Units and warrant agent for
the Class A warrants.
-37-
<PAGE>
SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS
The Following table provides (i) the names of the selling warrant holders,
(ii) the number of shares of common stock owned by the selling security holders
before the offering, (iii) the number of Class A warrants held by the selling
security holders before the offering, (iv) the number of shares of common stock
which may be resold under this prospectus, and (v) the number of Class A
Warrants held by the selling security holders which may be resold under this
Prospectus. After the completion of the offering, assuming all the warrants
offered hereby are sold, and, in the event any of the warrants are exercised,
assuming the shares of common stock issued upon such exercise are sold, no
selling warrant holder will hold any of our securities, except as set forth in
the footnotes below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares of
Common Stock
Shares of Which May Be Class A Warrants
Common Stock Class A Warrants Resold Under Which May Be
Owned Before Held Before This Resold Under
Selling Warrant Holder Offering (1) Offering (1) Prospectus(2) This Prospectus
- ------------------------------------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
The Frank & Brynde Berkowitz Family -- 31,250 31,250 31,250
Foundation
Abraham E. Cohen -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
Paul F. DePond (3)(4)(5) 405,939 25,000 25,000 25,000
Nathan Eisen & Rose Eisen -- 25,000 25,000 25,000
Susan Gartenburg Revocable Trust -- 6,250 6,250 6,250
Deborah Katzin Memorial Chesed Society -- 6,250 6,250 6,250
Regina Lehrer Trust -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
Alan C. Levinson & Audry J. Levinson -- 6,250 6,250 6,250
William Newman -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
Neal J & Amy Polan -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
The Rubin Family Foundation, Inc. -- 25,000 25,000 25,000
Schon Family Foundation, -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
Gary J. Strauss -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
E. Donald Shapiro -- 25,000 25,000 25,000
Mordecai Soloff -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
South Ferry #2, L.P.(6) 10,000 160,000 150,000 150,000
Weingarten Family Foundation -- 12,500 12,500 12,500
Joel Wolff -- 25,000 25,000 25,000
</TABLE>
__________________________
(1) As of March 1, 2000.
(2) Assuming selling security holders exercise all warrants registered hereby
instead of reselling such warrants.
(3) Mr. DePond will own 405,939 shares of our common stock after the offering.
(4) Mr. DePond will own 8.3% of our common stock after the offering. Mr.
DePond's ownership percentage is calculated assuming no Class A warrants
offered hereby are exercised and 4,878,364 shares of common stock are
outstanding after the offering.
(5) Mr. DePond has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman
of the Board of Directors of Notify Technology since August, 1994.
(6) South Ferry #2, L.P. will own 10,000 shares of our common stock and 10,000
Class A warrants after the offering.
-38-
<PAGE>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling security holders may sell all or a portion of their Class A
warrants, or all or a portion of the shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of the Class A warrants from time to time on the Nasdaq SmallCap
Market. Such sales will be made at prices prevailing at the times of the sales.
The selling security holders may also make private sales directly or through a
broker or brokers, who may act as agent or as principal. In connection with any
sales, the security holders and any brokers participating in such sales may be
deemed to be underwriters within the meaning of the Securities Act. Notify
Technology Corporation will receive no part of the proceeds of such resales made
hereunder.
Any broker-dealer participating in such transactions as agent may receive
commissions from the security holders (and, if they act as agent for the
purchaser of such Class A warrants or shares, from such purchaser). Usual and
customary brokerage fees will be paid by the security holders. Broker-dealers
may agree with the security holders to sell a specified number of Class A
warrants or shares at a stipulated price per security, and, to the extent such a
broker-dealer is unable to do so acting as agent for the security holders, to
purchase as principal any unsold Class A warrants or shares at the price
required to fulfill the broker-dealer commitment to the security holders.
Broker-dealers who acquire Class A warrants or shares as principal may
thereafter resell such Class A warrants or shares from time to time in
transactions (which may involve crosses and block transactions and which may
involve sales to and through other broker-dealers, including transactions of the
nature described above) in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated
transactions or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at
negotiated prices, and in connection with such resales may pay to or receive
from the purchasers of such Class A warrants or shares commissions computed as
described above.
The anti-manipulative of Regulation M under the Exchange Act may apply to
sales in the market by certain of the selling security holders. These selling
security holders may indemnify any broker-dealer that participates in
transactions involving the sale of the Class A warrants or shares against
certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act. Any
commissions paid or any discounts or concessions allowed to any such broker-
dealers, and any profits received on the resale of such Class A warrants or
shares, may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the
Securities Act if any such broker-dealers purchase Class A warrants or shares as
principal.
Upon notification by certain of the selling security holders to Registrant
that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the
sale of shares through a cross or block trade, a supplemental prospectus will be
filed under Rule 424(c) under the Securities Act setting forth the name of the
participating broker-dealer(s), the number of shares involved, the price at
which such shares were sold by such selling security holders, the commissions
paid or discounts or concessions allowed these selling security holders to such
broker-dealer(s), and where applicable, that such broker-dealer(s) did not
conduct any investigation to verify the information set out in this Prospectus.
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, our transfer agent, has been
designated as warrant agent (the "Warrant Agent") for the Class A warrants.
Pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, if at the time of the exercise of any Class A
warrant in respect of that warrant (i) the market price of our common stock is
greater than the purchase price of the warrant, (ii) the exercise of the warrant
was solicited by a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. ("NASD"), (iii) the warrant was not held in a discretionary account, (iv)
disclosure of compensation arrangements was made both at the time of the
original offering and at the time of exercise; and (v) the solicitation of the
exercise of the warrant was not in violation of Regulation M promulgated under
the Exchange Act, the Warrant Agent, simultaneously with the distribution of the
proceeds from the exercise of the Class A warrant to us shall, on behalf of us,
pay from the proceeds, a fee of 5% of the purchase price to D. H. Blair & Co. A
portion of such fee may be reallowed by D. H. Blair & Co. to the dealer who
solicited the exercise. In the event that the above conditions are not met, we
will not pay any finder's fee
-39-
<PAGE>
or commission in connection with the offering hereby of the shares in connection
with the exercise of the Class A warrants. We will pay all of the expenses
incident to this offering which are estimated to be less than $189,154.
The Class A warrants may be exercised any time before August 28, 2002.
Delivery of shares of common stock upon exercise of a warrant will be made to
the holder immediately following receipt by the Warrant Agent of the original
Warrant Certificate, with the subscription form on the reverse thereof duly
executed, along with payment of the purchase price in cash or by official bank
or certified check payable to Notify Technology Corporation. A Class A warrant
shall be deemed to have been exercised immediately prior to the close of
business on the date of exercise and the person entitled to receive the shares
deliverable upon such exercise shall be treated for all purposes as the holder
of those shares as of the close of business on the date of exercise. Any shares
issued in connection with a timely exercise will be shares of our common stock
which have been registered for resale under the Securities Act.
There can be no assurance that the selling security holders will sell any
or all of the Class A warrants or shares of common stock offered by them
hereunder.
-40-
<PAGE>
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us
by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, Palo Alto,
California.
EXPERTS
Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, have audited our financial
statements at September 30, 1999 and for the years ended September 30, 1998 and
1999, as set forth in their report. We've included our financial statements in
the prospectus and elsewhere in the registration statement in reliance on Ernst
& Young LLP's report, given on their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 under the Securities
Act, as amended, with the SEC with respect to the common stock offered pursuant
to this prospectus. This prospectus, which forms a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information included in the registration
statement and amendments thereof and the exhibits thereto, which are available
for inspection without charge, and copies of which may be obtained at prescribed
rates, at the office of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549, and at the regional offices of the SEC at 7 World Trade Center, 13th
Floor, New York, New York 10048, and at the Northwestern Atrium Center, 500 West
Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. The SEC maintains a Web site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission
(http://www.sec.gov).
We will provide, without charge, to each person who received a prospectus,
upon written or oral request of such person to us at the mailing address or
telephone number listed below, a copy of any of the information incorporated by
reference. The mailing address of our principal executive offices is Notify
Technology Corporation, 1054 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 105, San Jose, California
95129 and our telephone number is (408) 777-7920.
-41-
<PAGE>
Index to Financial Statements
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors F-2
Audited Financial Statements
Balance Sheets................................................................... F-3
Statements of Operations......................................................... F-4
Statement of Shareholders' Equity................................................ F-5
Statements of Cash Flows......................................................... F-6
Notes to Financial Statements.................................................... F-7
</TABLE>
F-1
<PAGE>
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Notify Technology Corporation
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Notify Technology Corporation
as of September 30, 1999, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1999 and
1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Notify Technology Corporation
at September 30, 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the years ended September 30, 1999 and 1998, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
October 25, 1999
F-2
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Balance Sheets
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, December 31,
1999 1999
-------------------------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,121,753 $ 2,593,343
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $15,609 at September 30, 1999 and
$16,037 at December 31, 1999 677,032 848,329
Inventories 534,467 736,458
Other current assets 140,579 67,548
----------- -----------
Total current assets 3,473,831 4,245,678
Property and equipment, net 240,024 251,557
Other assets 72,110 51,277
----------- -----------
$ 3,785,965 $ 4,548,512
=========== ===========
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 419,416 474,732
Other accrued liabilities 344,917 651,727
Accrued payroll and related 184,828 163,156
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities 949,161 1,289,615
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding --- ---
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized,
4,403,177 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 1999
and 4,714,688 at December 31, 1999 4,403 4,715
Additional paid-in capital 12,163,151 13,284,781
Notes receivable from shareholders (7,026) (7,026)
Deferred compensation (116,688) (116,688)
Accumulated deficit (9,207,036) (9,906,885)
----------- -----------
Total shareholders' equity 2,836,804 3,258,897
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 3,785,965 $ 4,548,512
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
F-3
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Statements of Operations
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended Three-Month Period ended
September 30, December 31,
------------------------------- -------------------------------
1998 1999 1998 1999
------------------------------- -------------------------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Product sales $ 1,638,268 $ 1,836,142 $ 226,344 $1,069,678
Cost of sales 1,582,042 1,721,029 112,300 735,445
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Gross profit 56,226 115,113 114,044 334,233
Operating costs and expenses:
Research and development 1,376,767 1,361,792 327,375 379,036
Sales and marketing 589,295 837,334 186,989 318,386
General and administrative 884,442 1,136,779 226,287 363,261
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Total operating costs and expenses 2,850,504 3,335,905 740,651 1,060,683
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Loss from operations (2,794,278) (3,220,792) (626,607) (726,450)
Other income and expense, net 176,717 97,508 20,776 26,601
----------- ----------- ---------- ----------
Net loss $(2,617,561) $(3,123,284) $ (605,831) $ (699,849)
=========== =========== ========== ==========
Basic and diluted loss per share $ (1.14) $ (1.11) $ (0.26) $ (0.20)
=========== =========== ========== ==========
Weighted average shares used in computing 2,296,449 2,801,410 2,298,584 3,432,946
net loss per share =========== =========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
F-4
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Statement of Shareholders' Equity
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Notes
Additional Receivable Total
Common Stock Paid-In from Deferred Accumulated Shareholders
-------------------
Shares Amount Capital Shareholders Compensation Deficit Equity
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at September 30, 1997 3,547,214 $3,547 $ 8,942,916 $(15,775) $ ---- $(3,466,191) $ 5,464,497
Repurchases of common stock from
shareholder (7,544) (7) (550) ---- ---- ---- (557)
Repayment of notes receivable from
shareholders ---- ---- ---- 4,378 ---- ---- 4,378
Proceeds from exercise of options and
warrants 1,899 2 3,051 ---- ---- ---- 3,053
Net loss and comprehensive net loss ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (2,617,561) (2,617,561)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at September 30, 1998 3,541,569 3,542 8,945,417 (11,397) ---- (6,083,752) 2,853,810
Repurchases of common stock from
shareholder (2,784) (3) (1,117) ---- ---- ---- (1,120)
Repayment of notes receivable from
shareholders ---- ---- ---- 4,371 ---- ---- 4,371
Proceeds from exercise of options and
warrants 14,392 14 8,029 ---- ---- ---- 8,043
Issuance of common stock pursuant to
private offering, net of issuance
costs 850,000 850 3,043,360 ---- ---- ---- 3,044,210
Deferred compensation relating to
grant of stock options ---- ---- 167,462 ---- (167,462) ---- ----
Amortization of deferred compensation ---- ---- ---- ---- 50,774 ---- 50,774
Net loss and comprehensive net loss ---- ---- ---- ---- (3,123,284) (3,123,284)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at September 30, 1999 4,403,177 4,403 12,163,151 (7,026) (116,688) (9,207,036) 2,836,804
Repurchases of common stock from
shareholder (unaudited) (309) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Proceeds from exercise of options and
warrants (unaudited) 200 ---- 181 ---- ---- ---- 181
Proceeds from exercise of options and
warrants (unaudited) 311,600 312 1,121,449 ---- ---- ---- 1,121,761
Net loss and comprehensive net loss
(unaudited) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (699,849) (699,849)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999
(unaudited) 4,714,668 $4,715 $13,284,781 $ (7,026) $(116,688) $(9,906,885) $ 3,258,897
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
F-5
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Statements of Cash Flows
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended September Three-month Period
30, ended December 31,
--------------------------- --------------------------
1998 1999 1998 1999
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows used in operating activities
Net loss $(2,617,561) $(3,123,284) $ (605,831) $ (699,849)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 54,207 151,689 16,619 47,316
Amortization of deferred compensation ---- 50,774 ---- ----
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 348,037 (588,164) 12,426 (171,296)
Inventory 267,255 293,857 (7,918) (201,991)
Other current assets (214,142) (47,822) (63,141) 55,316
Accounts payable (481,174) 185,236 (43,409) 285,139
Other accrued liabilities 26,277 209,372 33,011 73,031
--------------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (2,617,101) (2,868,342) (658,243) (612,334)
Cash flows used in investing activities
Expenditures for property and equipment (65,825) (183,022) (2,036) (38,017)
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing
activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock ---- 3,044,210 ---- ----
Repayments under line of credit (36,665) ---- ---- ----
Payments on repurchase of unvested stock (354) (1,120) ---- ----
Payments on notes payable to shareholders (200,000) ---- ---- ----
Payments of notes receivable from shareholders 4,175 4,371 ---- ----
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants 3,052 8,043 ---- 1,121,942
--------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (229,792) 3,055,504 ---- 1,121,942
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,912,718) 4,140 (660,279) 471,591
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 5,030,331 2,117,613 2,117,613 2,121,753
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,117,613 $ 2,121,753 $1,457,334 $2,593,344
========================================================
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest $ 1,949 $ ---- $ ---- $ ----
========================================================
</TABLE>
F-6
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Business
On February 25, 1998, the Company changed its name from Notify Corporation
to Notify Technology Corporation. Notify Technology Corporation (the "Company")
develops, manufactures and markets computer telephony products.
The Company's financial statements are prepared and presented on a basis
assuming it continues as a going concern. At September 30, 1999, the Company
had an accumulated deficit of $9,207,036 and incurred a net loss of $3,123,284
for the year ended September 30,1999. The Company's recently developed products
will need to attain favorable market acceptance to continue its research and
development activities and fund operating expenses at current levels.
Management believes that sufficient funds will be available from cash, cash
equivalents, and operating activities to support the current level of operations
through September 30, 2000. There can be no assurance that the Company's new
products will attain favorable market acceptance. If the Company is unable to
attain certain revenue goals, significant reductions in spending and the delay
or cancellation of planned activities or more substantial restructuring of the
Company may be necessary. In such an event, the Company intends to implement
expense reduction plans in a timely manner to enable the Company to meet its
cash requirements through at least September 30, 2000. These actions would have
material adverse effects on the Company's business, results of operations, and
prospects.
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying balance sheet as of December 31, 1999 and the statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the three-month periods
ending December 31, 1998 and 1999 are unaudited. In the opinion of management,
the statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial
statements and include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of interim periods. The data
disclosed in these notes to the financial statement for these periods is also
unaudited. Results for the three-month period ended December 31, 1999 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending
September 30, 2000.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company is
exposed to credit risk in the event of default by the financial institutions to
the extent of amounts recorded on the balance sheet.
F-7
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lesser of actual cost, on a first-in, first-out
basis, or market and consist of the following:
September 30, December 31,
1999 1999
------------------- -----------------
Raw materials $287,022 $172,785
Work-in-process 114,863 394,547
Finished goods 132,582 169,126
------------------- -----------------
$534,467 $736,458
=================== =================
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated or amortized on a
straight-line basis of the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the asset or
the lease term. The estimated useful lives range from three to five years.
Other Assets
At September 30,1999, other assets primarily consist of a prepaid royalty for
certain technology rights, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis
over a three-year period through December 2000.
Revenue Recognition
Product sales are generally recognized at the time the product is shipped,
title has transferred and no obligations remain. A provision is made for
estimated product returns at the time of sale. Service income is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the period of the service agreement.
F-8
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - continued
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company performs on-going credit evaluations and generally requires no
collateral. The Company maintains reserves for credit losses, and such losses
have been within management's expectations. At September 30, 1999, two
customers accounted for 26% and 23% of accounts receivable.
Stock Options
The Company accounts for its stock option plan in accordance with provisions
of the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees" (APB No. 25), because the Company believes the alternative fair
value accounting provided for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123), requires the
use of option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing
employee stock options. Under APB No. 25, because the exercise price of the
Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock
on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic and fully dilutive net loss per share is calculated in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" (SFAS
128). All earnings per share amounts for all periods have been presented and,
where necessary, restated to conform to the SFAS 128 requirements. The weighted
average number of common shares used in the net loss per share calculation was
reduced by the common stock and potential common shares placed in escrow in
connection with the Company's initial public offering.
Options to purchase 54,000 and 123,760 shares of common stock were
outstanding at September 30, 1998 and 1999, respectively, but were not included
in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be anti-
dilutive.
Comprehensive Income
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income" (SFAS
130). SFAS 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display of
comprehensive income and its components and is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1997. The Company adopted SFAS 130 in fiscal 1999.
The adoption of SFAS 130 had no impact on the Company's net loss or
shareholders' equity.
F-9
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
2. Note Receivable
In fiscal 1998, the Company issued an unsecured $50,000 note receivable to a
supplier that was fully repaid in fiscal 1999.
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
September 30, December 31,
1999 1999
------------- ------------
Furniture and office equipment $ 367,500 $ 401,650
Software 57,204 61,071
Leasehold improvements 2,246 2,246
426,950 464,967
------------- ------------
Less accumulated depreciation and
Amortization (186,926) (213,410)
------------- ------------
$ 240,024 $ 251,557
============= ============
4. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company currently occupies a facility under an operating lease, which
expires in March 2001, and contains renewal options to extend the lease term for
one two-year period. Future minimum payments under this lease for the year ended
September 30, 2000 and 2001 are $149,000 and $75,000, respectively.
Rent expense totaled $112,000 and $146,000 for the years ended September 30,
1998 and 1999, respectively.
At September 30, 1999, the Company had $527,000 of outstanding letters of
credit to its suppliers.
5. Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors has the authority, without any further vote or action
by the shareholders, to provide for the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock from time to time in one or more series with such designation,
rights, preferences, and limitations as the Board of Directors may determine,
including the consideration received therefore, the number of shares comprising
each series, dividend rates, redemption provisions, liquidation preferences,
redemption and fund provisions, conversion rights, and voting rights, all
without the approval of the holders of common stock.
F-10
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
5. Shareholders' Equity - continued
Common Stock
The following table summarizes shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance by the Company:
September 30,
1999
---------------
1997 Stock Plan........................................ 190,948
Warrant agreements..................................... 3,450,388
---------------
3,641,336
===============
In connection with an offering to the public in August 1997 (the Offering),
the Company granted an underwriter an option to purchase up to 160,000 units
(consisting of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant), exercisable
at $7.00 per unit, commencing in August 2000 and expiring in August 2002.
In March 1999, the Company issued 850,000 shares of common stock for proceeds
of $3,043,360, net of issuance costs approximating $16,000. In connection with
this private placement, the Company also issued warrants to purchase 1,344,444
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.60.
The warrants consist of four warrants to purchase 155,800 shares of common
stock, expiring upon the earlier of September 3, 2000 or 30 days after the
Company meets certain product sales or revenue milestones, and one warrant to
purchase 721,244 shares of common stock, expiring in March 2003. The Company
also agreed to issue additional warrants if it sells shares of common stock in a
capital raising transaction at a price below $3.60 per share prior to the
earlier of (i) March 30, 2002 or (ii) the date on which the Company calls the
outstanding Class A warrants.
Warrants
At September 30, 1999, 2,025,000 Class A warrants issued in connection with
the Offering and other financings were outstanding. Each Class A warrant
entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price
of $6.50, subject to adjustment, at any time through August 2001. Under certain
circumstances, the warrants are subject to redemption by the Company at $0.05
per warrant on 30 days written notice.
F-11
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
5. Shareholders' Equity - continued
In addition, at September 30, 1999, 1,344,444 warrants issued in connection
with the private placement in March 1999 were outstanding, as well as 205,510
warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, issued in connection
with various financings. These warrants are exercisable at any time at prices
ranging from $0.25 to $5.05 per share and expire at dates ranging from April
2000 to April 2002.
At September 30, 1999, warrants to purchase common stock included 123,554 and
24,752 warrants held by three directors and one employee, respectively.
On October 12, 1999, the Company received proceeds of $1,122,000 from the
exercise of 311,600 of the warrants issued in connection with the private
placement at a price of $3.60 per share.
1997 Stock Plan
The Notify Corporation 1997 Stock Plan (the Plan), provides for the granting
of stock options to employees, officers, consultants, and directors of the
Company. Stock options are granted at fair market value on the date of grant
with terms of up to ten years. A total of 200,000 shares of the Company's common
stock were reserved for issuance under the Plan as of September 30, 1999. Under
the terms of these option grants, 25% of the options vest upon the first
anniversary of the date of grant, and an additional 1/48 of the options vest
ratably over the following 36 months.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
Options Outstanding
-------------------
Shares Weighted
Available Number Average
For Grant of Shares Price
----------- --------- --------
Balance at September 30, 1997.............. 182,500 17,500 $4.750
Grants..................................... (79,875) 79,875 $2.145
Cancellations.............................. 41,500 (41,500) $3.094
Exercises.................................. -- (1,875) $1.625
-------- -------
Balance at September 30, 1998.............. 144,125 54,000 $2.742
Grants..................................... (171,000) 171,000 $4.062
Cancellations.............................. 94,063 (94,063) $2,743
Exercises.................................. -- (7,177) $0.906
-------- -------
Balances at September 30, 1999............. 67,188 123,760 $4.672
======== =======
F-12
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
5. Shareholders' Equity - continued
The following table summarizes outstanding and exercisable options at
September 30, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------- -------------------
Weighted Number of Weighted
Number of Average Options Average
Exercise Options Remaining Exercisable Exercise
Prices Outstanding Life in Years Shares Price
-------- ----------- ------------- ----------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$0.906 51,760 8.66 13,719 $0.906
$3.781 15,000 9.40 -- $3.781
$7.344 28,000 9.64 -- $7.344
$7.750 17,000 9.91 -- $7.750
$7.656 10,000 9.97 -- $7.656
$7.906 2,000 9.67 2,000 $7.906
------- ------
123,760 9.26 15,719 $1.800
======= ======
</TABLE>
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $1.40 in 1998 and
$3.35 in 1999.
On October 13, 1998, the Company repriced 54,000 employee stock options to
$0.906 per share.
The Company has elected to follow APB No. 25 and related interpretations in
accounting for its employee stock options because, as discussed below, the
alternative fair value accounting provided for under SFAS 123 requires use of
option valuation models that were not developed for use in valuing employee
stock options. Under APB No. 25, because the exercise price of the Company's
employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying common stock on
the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
SFAS 123 requires pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per
share as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted
subsequent to September 30, 1995 under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The
fair value of the options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-
Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: a weighted average
expected life of the option of four years; risk-free interest rates of 6.0%;
dividend yields of 0.0%; and volatility factors of the expected market price of
the Company's common stock of 112% and 136% for 1998 and 1999, respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
F-13
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
5. Shareholders' Equity - continued
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 1999 is as
follows:
1998 1999
------------ ------------
Net loss:
As reported................................. $(2,618,000) $(3,123,000)
Pro forma................................... (2,637,000) (3,173,000)
Basic and diluted net loss per share:
As reported................................. $ (1.14) $ (1.11)
Pro forma................................... (1.15) (1.13)
The Company recognized compensation expense of $51,000 in fiscal 1999 related
to the grant of options to nonemployees.
Escrow Securities
In connection with the Offering, holders of the Company's common and
preferred stock agreed to place 1,242,985 of their shares into escrow, and
holders of certain warrants agreed to place warrants to purchase 126,759 shares
of common stock into escrow. The securities will be released to the holders in
the event specified levels of pretax income of the Company for the years ended
September 30, 1998 to 2003 are achieved, or the market price of the Company's
common stock attains specified targets during a 36-month period commencing from
the effective date of the registration statement relating to the Company's
public offering. Any securities remaining in escrow on September 30, 2003 will
be forfeited, which securities will then be contributed to the Company's
capital. The pretax income levels are subject to proportionate adjustment upon
the issuance of certain securities subsequent to the Company's initial public
offering.
In the event that the foregoing earnings or market price levels are attained
and the escrowed securities released, the Securities and Exchange Commission has
adopted the position that the release of escrowed securities to officers,
directors, employees and consultants of the Company will be compensatory and,
accordingly, will result in compensation expense for financial reporting
purposes. The expense will equal the fair value of the escrowed securities on
the date of release and will result in a material charge to operations. At
September 30, 1999, the Company had not attained any of the specified earnings
or market price levels.
6. Related Party Transactions
The Company has an ongoing business relationship with a literature and
product fulfillment company managed by a director of the Company. The Company
uses this fulfillment company on a project by project basis to facilitate the
distribution of its products. The Company paid to this fulfillment company
$61,600, $4,000 and $0 during fiscal 1998 and 1999 and the three month period
ending December 31, 1999, respectively.
F-14
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
7. Income Taxes
Due to operating losses, there were no provisions for income taxes for 1998
or 1999. The expected statutory tax rate of 34% is offset by the inability to
recognize an income tax benefit from the operating losses.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Company's deferred tax assets for federal and state income taxes are as
follows:
September 30,
---------------------------------
1998 1999
----------- ----------
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards......... $ 2,023,000 $ 3,000,000
Research credit carryforwards............ 75,000 150,000
Other temporary differences.............. 226,000 350,000
----------- ----------
Total deferred tax assets................ 2,324,000 3,500,000
Valuation allowance........................ (2,324,000) (3,500,000)
----------- ----------
Net deferred tax assets................ $ -- $ --
=========== ===========
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, the
timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, a valuation allowance, in
an amount equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established to reflect
these uncertainties. The change in the valuation allowance was a net increase of
$935,000 and $1,176,000 for fiscal years 1998 and 1999, respectively.
As of September 30, 1999, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $16,000,000 for federal and California tax purposes, which will
expire in years 2002 through 2019. As of September 30, 1999, the Company also
had research and development tax credit carryforwards for federal and California
purposes of approximately $110,000 and $60,000, respectively. The credits will
expire in 2010 through 2019, if not utilized. Utilization of net operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation
due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result
in the expiration of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards before full
utilization.
8. Industry Segment, Customer and Geographic Information
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS 131). SFAS 131 changes standards for
the way that public business enterprises identify and report operating segments
in annual and interim financial statements. SFAS 131 requires selected
information about an enterprise's operating segments. Currently, the Company has
one operating segment by which management evaluates performance. Accordingly,
there are no additional disclosure requirements involved with the Company's
adoption of SFAS 131.
F-15
<PAGE>
Notify Technology Corporation
Notes to Financial Statements
(Information at December 31, 1999 and for the three-month
periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is unaudited)
8. Industry Segment, Customer and Geographic Information - continued
The Company sells its products within the United States primarily to regional
bell operating companies and local exchange carriers. Two products accounted for
41% and 34% of total revenues in fiscal 1999. Another product accounted for 81%
of total revenue in fiscal 1998. One customer accounted for 50% and 11% of sales
in fiscal 1998 and 1999, respectively. Two other customers accounted for 17% and
55% of sales in fiscal 1998 and 1999, respectively.
9. Subsequent Events
On February 16, 2000, the Company received proceeds of $560,900 from the
exercise of 155,800 of the warrants issued in connection with the private
placement at a price of $3.60 per share.
On February 23, 2000, the shareholders of the Company voted to add 500,000
shares for issuance under the 1997 Stock Plan.
F-16
<PAGE>
PART II
Information Not Required in Prospectus
Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Section 317 of the California Corporations Code authorizes a court to
award, or a corporation's board of directors to grant indemnity to directors and
officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under
certain circumstances for liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses
incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"). Our Bylaws provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers to
the fullest extent permitted by California law, including circumstances in which
indemnification is otherwise discretionary under California law. We have entered
into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers containing
provisions which are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification
provisions contained in the California Corporations Code. The indemnification
agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify our directors and
officers against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or
service as directors or officers (other than liabilities arising from willful
misconduct of culpable nature), to advance their expenses incurred as a result
of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to
obtain directors' and officers' insurance if available on reasonable terms.
Article IV of the Registrant's Articles of Incorporation (Exhibit 3.1 hereto)
provides for indemnification of its directors and officers to the maximum extent
permitted by the California Corporations Code and Article IV of the Registrant's
Bylaws (Exhibit 3.3 hereto) provides for indemnification of its directors,
officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the
California Corporation Code. Reference is also made to Section 6(b) of the
Underwriting Agreement contained in Exhibit 1.1 hereto, indemnifying officers
and directors of the Registrant against certain liabilities.
Item 25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than
underwriting discounts and commissions, payable in connection with the sale of
the common stock being registered hereby. All amounts are estimates, except the
registration fee and the NASD filing fee.
Item Amount
---- --------
Printing and engraving expenses $ 5,000
Legal fees and expenses 20,000
Auditors' accounting fees and expenses 20,000
Transfer Agent and Registrar fees 5,000
Solicitation Fee(1) 138,125
Miscellaneous expenses 5,000
--------
Total $188,125
___________________
(1) This fee is payable to the underwriter of our initial public offering if the
exercise of the Class A warrants is solicited and certain other certain
conditions are met. See "Plan of Distribution."
II-1
<PAGE>
Item 26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
The following is a summary of the transactions by Registrant during the
last three years involving sales of Registrant's securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act:
(1) In April 1997, we issued to one of our directors a 10% subordinated
promissory note with a principal amount of $200,000 and warrant to purchase
2,970 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $5.00 for an aggregate
purchase price of $200,000. The sale and issuance of these securities was exempt
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section
4(2) thereof.
(2) In August 1997, we issued to Sutton Partners, L.P., a 10% promissory
note with a principal amount of $175,000. The issuance of the this note was
exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereof.
(3) In March 1999, we sold to David Brewer 850,000 shares of our common
stock and warrants to purchase 1,334,444 shares of our common stock for
aggregate consideration of $3,060,000. The sale of our common stock and warrants
was exempt registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2)
thereof.
(4) In October 1999, Mr. David Brewer exercised two warrants and received
a total of 311,600 shares of common stock underlying the warrants for an
aggregate exercise price of $1,121,760.
(5) In February 2000, Mr. David Brewer exercised one warrant and received
a total of 155,800 shares of common stock underlying the warrant for an
aggregate exercise price of $560,880.
The sale and exchange of the above securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration under the Securities Act as indicated. The recipients of securities
in each such transaction represented their intention to acquire the securities
for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any
distribution thereof and appropriate legends were attached to the share
certificates issued in such transactions. All recipients had adequate access to
information about the Registrant.
Item 27. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit (3.2) to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on
March 14, 1997)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (3.2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-
23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
4.1 Form of Warrant Agreement. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (4.1) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May 29, 1997)
4.2 Form of common stock certificate. (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit (4.3) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May 29, 1997)
5.1* Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
II-2
<PAGE>
10.1 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Paul DePond. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.2 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Paul DePond. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Post-Effective Amentment No.
4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No.
333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Gaylan Larson. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.4 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Gaylan Larson.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Post-Effective
Amentment No. 4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Gerald Rice. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.6 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Gerald Rice. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit (10.6) to Post-Effective Amentment No.
4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No.
333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.7 Form of Indemnification Agreement. (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit (10.5) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on March 14, 1997)
10.8 Escrow Agreement by and between Registrant, the American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company and certain security holders of the
Registrant, as amended. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
(10.6) to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.9 Registrant's 1997 Stock Plan, as amended. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.9) to Post-Effective Amentment No. 4 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369,
filed on April 18, 2000)
10.10 Lease between Registrant and C.C. Poon. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.9) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May
29, 1997)
10.11+ Nonexclusive Technology License Agreement between Registrant and
Active Voice Corporation dated April 30, 1997. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.10) to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on
August 15, 1997)
10.12 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 4, 1999 between
Registrant and David A. Brewer. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (10.11) to Post-Effective Amentment No. 3 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on
April 4, 1999)
10.13 Amendment No. 1 dated October 7, 1999 to Securities Purchase Agreement
dated as of March 4, 1999 between Registrant and David Brewer.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.12) to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999, filed on December 28, 1999.
II-3
<PAGE>
10.14 Form of Underwriter's Unit Purchase Option. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (4.2) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May
29, 1997)
10.15 Stock Option Agreement dated November 11, 1999 between Registrant and
Dane Russell. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.15) to
Post-Effective Amentment No. 4 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
23.1. Consent of Independent Auditors
23.2* Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. (included as part of
Exhibit 5.1).
24.1* Power of Attorney.
_____
* Previously filed.
+ Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of this
exhibit.
(b) All schedules are omitted, since the required information is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of schedules or because the information
required is included in Registrant's financial statements and notes thereto.
Item 28. Undertakings.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small
business issuer pursuant to the provisions described in Item 24, or otherwise,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a
director, officer of controlling person of the Registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer
or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the
Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction
the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication
of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) It will file, during any period in which it offers or sells
securities, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:
(i) Include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act;
(ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually
or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the
Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease
in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered
would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or
high end of the estimated maximum offering range
II-4
<PAGE>
may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no
more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
"Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective Registration Statement;
and
(iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the
plan of distribution.
(2) For determining liability under the Securities Act, Registrant will
treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the
securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the
initial bona fide offering.
(3) It will file a post-effective amendment to remove from registration
any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.
(4) It will provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the
underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such
names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each
purchaser.
(5) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
the Registrant will treat the information omitted from the form of prospectus
filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and
contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant under Rule 424(b)(1),
or (4), or 497(h) under the Securities Act as part of this registration
statement as of the time the Commission declares it effective.
II-5
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the
Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all
of the requirements of the filing on Form SB-2 and authorized this Post-
Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Jose,
California, on April 14, 2000.
NOTIFY TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
By: /s/ Gerald W. Rice
-------------------------
Gerald W. Rice
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this Registration
statement on Form SB-2 has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
- ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- --------------------
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Paul F. DePond* President, Chief Executive Officer and April 14, 2000
- ---------------------------------------- Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)
Paul F. DePond
/s/ Gerald W. Rice Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial April 14, 2000
- ---------------------------------------- and Accounting Officer)
Gerald W. Rice
/s/ Gaylan Larson* Vice President, Operations and Director April 14, 2000
- ----------------------------------------
Gaylan Larson
/s/ Michael Ballard* Director April 14, 2000
- ----------------------------------------
Michael Ballard
/s/ Andrew Plevin* Director April 14, 2000
- ----------------------------------------
Andrew Plevin
Director
- ----------------------------------------
David Brewer
*By: /s/ Gerald W. Rice
------------------------------------
Attorney-in-Fact
</TABLE>
II-6
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Registrant. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit (3.2) to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on March 14, 1997)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of Registrant. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (3.2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369,
filed on April 18, 2000)
4.1 Form of Warrant Agreement. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (4.1) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May 29, 1997)
4.2 Form of common stock certificate. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (4.3) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May 29, 1997)
5.1* Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
10.1 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Paul DePond. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.1) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.2 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Paul DePond. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to Post-Effective Amendment No.
4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No.
333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.3 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Gaylan Larson. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.2) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.4 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Gaylan Larson.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.4) to Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.5 Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and
Gerald Rice. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.3) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-
2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
10.6 Amendment No. 1 dated February 23, 2000 to Employment Agreement dated
as of August 1, 1997 between Registrant and Gerald Rice. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit (10.6) to Post-Effective Amendment No.
4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No.
333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
10.7 Form of Indemnification Agreement. (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit (10.5) to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form
SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on March 14, 1997)
10.8 Escrow Agreement by and between Registrant, the American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company and certain security holders of the
Registrant, as amended. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
(10.6) to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement
on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on August 15, 1997)
<PAGE>
10.9 Registrant's 1997 Stock Plan, as amended. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.9) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369,
filed on April 18, 2000)
10.10 Lease between Registrant and C.C. Poon. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.9) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May
29, 1997)
10.11+ Nonexclusive Technology License Agreement between Registrant and
Active Voice Corporation dated April 30, 1997. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (10.10) to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on
August 15, 1997)
10.12 Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 4, 1999 between
Registrant and David A. Brewer. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit (10.11) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on
April 4, 1999)
10.13 Amendment No. 1 dated October 7, 1999 to Securities Purchase Agreement
dated as of March 4, 1999 between Registrant and David Brewer.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.12) to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 1999, filed on December 28, 1999.
10.14 Form of Underwriter's Unit Purchase Option. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit (4.2) to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on May
29, 1997)
10.15 Stock Option Agreement dated November 11, 1999 between Registrant and
Dane Russell. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (10.15) to
Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form SB-2, Reg. No. 333-23369, filed on April 18, 2000)
23.1. Consent of Independent Auditors
23.2* Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. (included as part of
Exhibit 5.1).
24.1* Power of Attorney.
_____
* Previously filed.
+ Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to portions of this
exhibit.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated October 25, 1999, in post-effective amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement (Form SB-2, No. 333-75895) and the related Prospectus
of Notify Technology Corporation for the registration of 425,000 redeemable
Class A warrants, and the 425,000 shares of Common Stock underlying the Class A
warrants.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Jose, California
April 11, 2000
