<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the
Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[ ] Definitive Proxy Statement
[x] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
SLM Holding Corporation
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[x] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, schedule or registration statement no.:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing party:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date filed:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 2
[SALLIEMAE LETTERHEAD]
April 29, 1998
<<FirstName>> <<LastName>>
<<Company>>
<<Address1>>
<<City>> <<State>> <<PostalCode>>
Re: SLM Holding Corporation; Items Submitted for
Shareholder Approval at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
May 21, 1998.
Dear <<LastName>>:
Enclosed for your reference is a copy of the definitive proxy
statement for SLM Holding Corporation (the successor to Student Loan Marketing
Association, or "Sallie Mae"). Four of the six items on the agenda for this
year's annual meeting relate to compensation matters. These items implement
the commitment made during last year's proxy contest by the Committee to
Restore Value at Sallie Mae (the "CRV") to establish equity-oriented and
performance-based compensation arrangements. We believe they underlie a
forward-looking and strongly shareholder-friendly compensation program. The
purpose of this letter is to provide you an overview of these items and to
solicit your support in their approval.
I have also attached a copy of the corporate governance principles
adopted by the Board of Directors, termed a "model" of corporate governance by
Institutional Shareholder Services.
ITEM 2: The Company is seeking shareholder approval of a Directors'
Stock Plan.
- The Company's directors are compensated only in stock options;
they do not receive cash as either a retainer or meeting fees;
- As with options granted to the executives and officers, the
directors' options are premium-vesting; i.e., they become
exercisable in one-third increments as the Company's stock price
reaches $42.86, $57.14 and $71.43;
- The maximum number of shares that may be granted under the
Directors' Plan is 3,000,000, currently representing 1.8 percent
of common shares outstanding. This Plan replaces the Sallie Mae
Board of Directors' Stock Option Plan, under which no new grants
will be made; and
- The Directors' Stock Plan explicitly states that shareholder
approval is required to reduce or adjust downward the exercise
price of options, whether through amendment, cancellation or
replacement grants or any other means.
<PAGE> 3
Page 2
ITEM 3: The Company is seeking shareholder approval of a Management
Incentive Plan ("MIP"). The MIP provides for options, incentive bonuses (a
Section 162(m) performance-based bonus arrangement), performance vesting stock
(not time-vesting restricted stock) and stock units (an equity-valued tax
deferral arrangement used only in settlement of options, incentive bonuses or
performance stock).
- The aggregate number of shares that can be issued under the MIP
may not exceed 6,000,000 shares, currently representing 3.5
percent of common shares outstanding. This plan replaces the
Sallie Mae 1993-1998 Stock Option Plan, the Sallie Mae Stock
Compensation Plan and the Sallie Mae Incentive Performance Plan,
under which no further grants will be made; and
- The MIP explicitly states that shareholder approval is required to
reduce or adjust downward the exercise price of options, whether
through amendment, cancellation or replacement grants or any other
means; and
- The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has
established an annual bonus program under which bonuses will be
paid based in part on corporate performance and in part based on
individual performance, in each case as judged against
preestablished performance goals.
ITEM 4: The Company is seeking shareholder approval of an amendment to
its 1993-1998 Stock Option Plan in order to provide for an option grant to the
Company's chief executive officer. The 1993-1998 Stock Option Plan had a
Section 162(m) limit of 525,000 shares per year for any one optionee. The
Compensation Committee determined to grant Mr. Lord an option for 1,050,000
shares in 1997, and not to grant Mr. Lord any other options until at least
1999, subject to shareholder approval of an amendment to the plan to
accommodate the up-front multi-year grant.
- As with options granted to the other executives, officers and
directors, Mr. Lord's options are premium-vesting; i.e., they
become exercisable in one-third increments if the Company's stock
price reaches $42.86, $57.14 and $71.43 and
- As promised during the proxy contest, Mr. Lord's compensation is
heavily performance-oriented. His 1998 salary is only $325,000.
Mr. Lord's salary and bonus potential have been determined to be
below those of peer companies. The options granted to him bring
his total compensation potential to the 75th percentile of peer
companies.
<PAGE> 4
Page 3
ITEM 5: The Company is seeking shareholder ratification of certain
option grants made to non-executive officers following the cancellation of
higher priced options. Even though approval of new grants following a
cancellation of outstanding options is not required under the Company's
1993-1998 Stock Option Plan, as a matter of good corporate governance, the
Board determined to seek shareholder ratification.
The SLM Board is aware of the views of many shareholders that options
should not be canceled and regranted without shareholder approval, in order to
allow shareholders to evaluate whether such action is abusive to their
interests. The Company's Board concurs that an option cancellation and regrant
is inappropriate when effected to compensate executives at a time when
shareholders have suffered a significant loss of value. The Company believes
that it is asking for shareholder ratification under a very different, and
factually unique, circumstance. Following are some of the reasons we believe
that the Company's action, and ratification of that action by shareholders, are
appropriate in this case:
- None of the affected options are held by executives;
- Initial option grants to mid-level managers were delayed in order
to allow the Company's new senior management team time to fulfill
its commitment to implement a significant reduction in mid-level
management ranks. The new grants were made to correct the pricing
differential that arose from that delay; and
- All of the affected options (as with all options held by
executives and directors) are subject to premium vesting (i.e.,
they vest in one-third increments if the Company's stock price
reaches $42.86, $57.14 and $71.43).
We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss with you any questions
you may have with respect to these items. We value your past support and
encourage you to vote for approval of the four above mentioned compensation
items as well as for the election of the 15 nominees recommended by the Board
of Directors and the ratification of the appointment of Arthur Anderson as
independent auditors. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Michael Arthur
Vice President, Investor Relations
<PAGE> 5
Board Governance Principles for SLM Holding Corporation
The directors of SLM Holding Corporation (the "Company") share a
strong commitment to principles of genuine accountability to shareholders. This
commitment is reflected in the charter and bylaws that the Board of Directors
instituted for the Company, which Institutional Shareholders Service termed "a
model of corporate governance." The following corporate governance provisions
appear as part of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws:
SIZE OF THE BOARD. The number of directors is set in the Certificate of
Incorporation at 15 and can be changed only by an affirmative vote of a
majority of the voting power of the capital stock of the Company.
REQUIREMENT OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. The Bylaws require that a majority of
the Board be comprised of independent directors. The Bylaws further require
that all of the members of the Audit, Nominations and Governance, and
Compensation and Personnel Committees, and a majority of the members of the
Executive Committee be independent directors.
DEFINITION OF INDEPENDENCE. The Bylaws provide that a director will not
generally be considered "independent" if he or she: (a) has been employed by
the Company or one of its affiliates in an executive capacity; (b) is an
employee or owner of a firm that is one of the Company's or its affiliates'
paid advisers or consultants; (c) is employed by a significant customer or
supplier; (d) has a personal services contract with the Company or one of its
affiliates; (e) is employed by a foundation or university that receives
significant grants or endowments from the Company or one of its affiliates; (f)
is a relative of an executive of the Company or one of its affiliates; (g) is
part of an interlocking directorate in which an executive officer of the
Company serves on the board of another corporation that employs the director;
or (h) is an employee of a firm that directly competes against the Company or
one of its affiliates.
TERM OF OFFICE OF DIRECTORS. Both the Certificate of Incorporation and the
Bylaws provide for directors to be elected annually at the annual meeting of
shareholders and to hold office only until reelected or until their successors
are elected at the next annual meeting (or special meeting held in lieu
thereof).
CUMULATIVE VOTING. The Certificate of Incorporation provides for cumulative
voting in the election of directors.
REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that directors
can be removed with or without cause by a vote of the shareholders entitled to
vote at an election of directors; except, however (i) a director can be removed
for cause only by a majority of the shareholders, and (ii) a director cannot be
removed without cause if the votes against removal represent enough votes to
elect such director at that meeting under the cumulative voting provisions.
BOARD VACANCIES. The Certificate of Incorporation provides that vacancies on
the Board may be filled only by the shareholders.
<PAGE> 6
POISON PILLS. The Certificate of Incorporation limits the ability of the
Company to adopt a shareholder rights plan (a so-called "poison pill") without
shareholder approval.
SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETINGS. The Bylaws provide that special meetings of the
shareholders can be called by either the Chairman of the Board or the CEO (if a
member of the Board) or at the written request of a majority of the Board or
one-third of the shareholders.
SHAREHOLDER CONSENTS TO ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING. The Certificate of
Incorporation provides that any action required or allowed to be taken at a
meeting of the shareholders may be taken without a meeting or a vote provided
that a consent in writing setting forth the action to be taken is signed by
holders of stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be
necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS. The Company has elected, in the Certificate of
Incorporation, to opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover statute pursuant to
Delaware General Corporate Law Section 203.
PROHIBITION AGAINST GREENMAIL. The Certificate of Incorporation includes
provisions barring the Company from making "greenmail" payments without
shareholder approval.
