JLK DIRECT DISTRIBUTION INC
SC TO-I/A, EX-99.A.12, 2000-11-07
INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
Previous: JLK DIRECT DISTRIBUTION INC, SC TO-I/A, EX-99.A.11, 2000-11-07
Next: JLK DIRECT DISTRIBUTION INC, SC TO-T/A, 2000-11-07



<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit (a)(12)


                          MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING


         The parties to the actions entitled Furtherfield Partners, L.P. v.
Kennametal, Inc., et al., Case No. GD 00-12565, Forrest J. Wagner v. Richard C.
Alberding, et al., Case No. GD 00-012800, and Jeffrey L. Vanderscoff v. Richard
C. Alberding, et al., Case No. GD 00-012809, pending in the Court of Common
Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (the "Actions"), by their respective
attorneys, have reached an agreement in principle providing for the settlement
of the Actions on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth below:

         1.       As a result of the negotiations between the undersigned
attorneys for the Parties, the following measures shall be taken in connection
with the proposed tender offer and merger (the "Tender Offer and Merger")
provided for in the Merger Agreement Among JLK Direct Distribution Inc. ("JLK"
or the "Company"), Kennametal Inc. ("Kennametal"), and Pegasus Acquisition
Corporation dated September 8, 2000 (the "Merger Agreement"):

                  a.       JLK shall file with the Securities and Exchange
                           Commission (the "SEC") a supplement (the
                           "Supplement") to the Offer to Purchase filed by them
                           on Schedule TO on October 3, 2000 with the SEC in
                           connection with the Tender Offer and Merger which
                           describes the following in a manner reasonably
                           acceptable to counsel for all Parties:

                           (i)      additional facts relating to the restricted
                                    shares issued to defendant Jeffery H.
                                    Boetticher and whether the restrictions on
                                    those shares will lapse as a result of the
                                    Tender Offer and Merger;

                           (ii)     additional facts relating to the product
                                    supply agreement referred to in the
                                    Background of the Transaction;

<PAGE>   2
                           (iii)    additional facts relating to the Background
                                    of the Transaction, including facts relating
                                    to the absence of negotiations with other
                                    interested parties.

         2.       Defendants acknowledge that the pendency of the Actions and
the efforts of plaintiffs' counsel were factors in the circumstances that
resulted in the increase in the offer price from $6.70 to $8.75 per share.

         3.       Subject to the reasonable and appropriate confirmatory
discovery that plaintiffs' counsel have undertaken, the Parties will attempt in
good faith to agree upon and execute a Stipulation of Settlement and such other
documentation as may be required in order to obtain the approval of the
Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas of the settlement and the dismissal of
the Actions upon the terms set forth in this Memorandum of Understanding. The
Stipulation of Settlement will expressly provide, inter alia, that Defendants
have denied, and continue to deny, that they have committed or have threatened
to commit any violations of law and that they are entering into the Stipulation
because the proposed settlement would eliminate the burden, risk and expense of
further litigation. The Stipulation will also acknowledge that (1) plaintiffs'
actions were a factor in the circumstances that resulted in the increase in the
offer price from $6.70 to $8.75 per share and (2) plaintiffs' actions have
caused the supplemental disclosures described herein.

         4.       The Parties will present the Settlement to the Allegheny
County Court of Common Pleas for final approval following appropriate notice to
the class members on whose behalf the Actions were instituted (the "Class"),
and will use their best efforts to obtain final court approval of the
Settlement, and the dismissal with prejudice of the Actions, as against the
named plaintiffs and the Class. Defendants shall assume the administrative
responsibility of providing notice, and shall

                                       2
<PAGE>   3
pay all costs and expenses incurred in providing such notice to the members of
the Class.

         5.       Class members shall not have any right to be excluded from
the Class.

         6.       The Stipulation of Settlement will also provide as follows:

                  a.       for the complete discharge, dismissal with
prejudice, settlement and release of, and an injunction barring, all claims,
demands, rights, actions or causes of action, rights, liabilities, damages,
losses, obligations, judgments, suits, matters and issues of any kind or nature
whatsoever, whether known or unknown, contingent or absolute, suspected or
unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, hidden or concealed, matured or
unmatured, that have been, could have been, or in the future can or might be
asserted in the Actions or in any court, tribunal or proceeding (including, but
not limited to, any claims arising under federal or state law relating to
alleged fraud, breach of any duty, negligence, violations of the federal
securities laws or otherwise) by or on behalf of any member of the Class,
whether individual, class, derivative, representative, legal, equitable or any
other type or in any other capacity against the Parties or any or all of their
respective past, present or future officers, directors, stockholders,
representatives, families, parent entities, associates, affiliates,
subsidiaries, employees, financial or investment advisors, consultants,
accountants, attorneys, investment bankers, engineers, advisors or agents,
heirs, executors, trustees, general or limited partners or partnerships,
personal representatives, estates, administrators, predecessors, successors,
and assigns (collectively, the "Released Persons") which have arisen, could
have arisen, arise now or hereafter arise out of, or relate in any manner to,
the allegations, facts, events, transactions, acts, occurrences, statements,
representations, misrepresentations, omissions or any other matter, thing or
cause whatsoever, or any series thereof, embraced, involved, set forth or
otherwise related, directly or indirectly, to the complaints filed in the
Actions, to the Tender Offer


                                       3
<PAGE>   4
and Merger, to the Merger Agreement, or to any offering or proxy material,
public filings or statements (including, but not limited to, public statements)
by any of the defendants in the Actions or any other Released Persons in
connection with the Tender Offer and Merger or the Merger Agreement, including,
but not limited to, the activities of the independent committee and any actions
or inactions taken or not taken by any party leading to or in contemplation of
the Tender Offer and Merger (collectively, the "Settled Claims"); and

                  b.       subject to the Order of the Court, pending final
determination of whether the Settlement provided for in the Stipulation of
Settlement should be approved, that plaintiff and all members of the Class, or
any of them, are barred and enjoined from commencing, prosecuting, instigating,
or in any way participating in the commencement or prosecution of any action
asserting any Settled Claims, either directly, representatively, derivatively,
or in any other capacity, against any Released Persons which have been or could
have been asserted, or which arise out of or relate in any way to any of the
transactions or events described in the complaints in the Actions, to the
Tender Offer and Merger, or to the Merger Agreement.

         7.       The consummation of the Settlement is subject to the drafting
and execution of an appropriate Stipulation of Settlement and such other
documentation as may be required to obtain final court approval of the
settlement and the dismissal of the Actions with prejudice as to all claims
asserted therein as against the named Defendants and their affiliates without
costs to any party (except as provided for in paragraph 9 below).

         8.       The Settlement contemplated by this Memorandum of
Understanding is binding upon all Parties, but it is understood that it is
subject to (a) court approval (and specifically, court approval of a non-opt
out national class); (b) the good faith documentation and execution of an
appropriate

                                       4
<PAGE>   5


Stipulation of Settlement; and (c) the closing of the Merger. This Memorandum of
Understanding shall be null and void and of no force and effect should any of
these conditions not be met and, in that event, this Memorandum of Understanding
shall not be admissible in any proceeding or be deemed to prejudice any of the
positions of the parties with respect to any action.

         9. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Memorandum of
Understanding and the Stipulation of Settlement contemplated hereby, JLK and/or
its successors in interest have agreed to pay Plaintiffs' Counsel fees and
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in an aggregate amount of up to $340,000.00.
JLK and its successors in interest agree to pay after the order of court
approving the settlement (including an order awarding fees and expenses) becomes
final and non-appealable. Plaintiffs' counsel agree that any such award of fees
and expenses shall represent payment for legal services rendered in the Actions,
and that they will not seek the award of any additional fees or expenses.

         10. Pending negotiation, execution and Court approval of the
Settlement, the plaintiffs in the Actions agree to stay any and all discovery
and to stay any and all other proceedings other than those incident to the
Settlement itself. The Parties also agree to use their best efforts to prevent,
stay or seek dismissal of or oppose entry of any interim or final relief in
favor of any member of the Class in any other litigation, against any of the
Parties to the Memorandum which challenges the Settlement or otherwise involves
a Settled Claim.

         11. This Memorandum of Understanding may be executed in any number of
counterparts with the same effect as if all Parties hereto and executed the same
document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute
one instrument.

         12. This Memorandum of Understanding constitutes the entire agreement
among the




                                       5
<PAGE>   6


Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and may not be amended nor
any of its provisions waived except by a writing signed by all of the
signatories hereto.

         13. This Memorandum of Understanding and the Settlement contemplated by
it shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State
of Pennsylvania, without regard to conflict of laws principles.

         14. Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' Counsel in the Actions represent and
warrant that none of plaintiffs' claims or causes of action referred to in the
Actions or in this Memorandum of Understanding, including any Settled Claims,
have been assigned, encumbered or in any manner transferred in whole or in part.



Dated: November 3, 2000



                                           SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP

                                        By: /s/ Marc A. Topaz
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Marc A. Topaz, Esquire
                                           3 Bala Plaza East, Suite 400
                                           Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004


                                           HARNES KELLER LLP

                                        By: /s/ Greg Keller
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Greg Keller, Esquire
                                           International Plaza,
                                           750 Lexington Avenue
                                           New York, NY 10022


                                           CO-COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE
                                           CLASS





                                       6
<PAGE>   7

                                           BUCHANAN INGERSOLL
                                           PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

                                        By:/s/ Stanley Yorsz
                                           --------------------------------
                                           Stanley Yorsz, Esquire
                                           (Pa I.D. No. 28979)
                                           One Oxford Centre
                                           301 Grant Street, 20th Floor
                                           Pittsburgh, PA 15219

                                           COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS






                                       7


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission