SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS
OF PORTFOLIO PARTNERS, INC.
This Supplement is dated August 12, 1998
The following information replaces certain information contained in the
Prospectus of Portfolio Partners, Inc. (the "Fund"), dated May 1, 1998, and
should be read in conjunction with that Prospectus. This supplement updates and
replaces a similar supplement dated May 1, 1998.
The section of the Prospectus entitled "PERFORMANCE--PERFORMANCE OF SIMILARLY
MANAGED MUTUAL FUNDS" found on page 13, is hereby replaced with the following:
Each Portfolio is recently organized and has only a short-term performance
record. Each Portfolio, however, has substantially the same investment
objective, policies and strategies as one or more existing mutual funds
("Comparable Funds") that are either sold directly to the public or through
variable products, advised by MFS, Scudder Kemper or T. Rowe Price, as the case
may be.
The historical performance of the Comparable Funds is presented below. Investors
should not consider the performance of the Comparable Funds as an indication of
the future performance of a Portfolio. The performance figures shown below
reflect the deduction of the historical fees and expenses paid by each
Comparable Fund, and not those to be paid by the Portfolio. The figures do not
reflect the deduction of any insurance fees or charges that are imposed by the
insurance company in connection with its sale of the VA Contracts and VLI
Policies. Investors should refer to the separate account prospectuses describing
the VA Contracts and VLI Policies for information pertaining to these insurance
fees and charges. The insurance separate account fees will have a detrimental
effect on the performance of the Portfolios. The results shown below reflect the
reinvestment of dividends and distributions, and were calculated in the same
manner that will be used by each Portfolio to calculate its own performance.
The following table shows average annual total returns of the Comparable Funds
for the stated periods ending June 30, 1998, as well as a comparison with the
performance of the applicable benchmark.(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
One Year Three Years Five Years Ten Years
---------- ------------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MFS Emerging Growth Fund (Class I)(2) 26.67% 25.16% 21.97% 21.34%
(Model for MFS Emerging Equities)(3)
Russell 2000 16.51 18.86 16.04 13.58
S&P 500 30.15 30.24 23.08 18.56
MFS Research Fund (Class I)(2) 26.79 28.28 22.61 18.07
(Model for MFS Research Growth)(3)
S&P 500 30.15 30.24 23.08 18.56
MFS Capital Opportunities Fund (formerly MFS Value Fund) (Class I)(2) 35.23 28.73 22.19 17.73
(Model for MFS Value Equity)(3)
S&P 500 30.15 30.24 23.08 18.56
Scudder VLIF International Portfolio 15.20 17.15 14.86 12.73
(Model for Scudder International Growth)
MSCI EAFE 6.10 10.69 10.03 6.79
Scudder International Fund 14.54 16.73 14.34 11.64
(Model for Scudder International Growth)
MSCI EAFE 6.10 10.69 10.03 6.79
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund 28.75 26.55 21.44 16.53
(Model for T. Rowe Price Growth Equity)
S&P 500 30.15 30.24 23.08 18.56
</TABLE>
- --------------
(1)The S&P 500 (Standard & Poor's 500) Index is a value-weighted, unmanaged
index of 500 widely held stocks considered to be representative of the stock
market in general. The Russell 2000 Index is a value-weighted, unmanaged index
of small capitalization stocks. The Morgan Stanley Capital International-Europe,
Australia, Far East (MSCI EAFE) Index is an unmanaged, market value-weighted
average of the performance of more than 900 securities listed on the stock
exchanges of countries in Europe, Australia and the Far East. All indices assume
reinvestment of all dividends.
(2)MFS Emerging Growth Fund and MFS Research Fund commenced offering Class I
shares on January 2, 1997; MFS Capital Opportunities Fund commenced offering
Class I shares on January 3, 1997. For periods preceding those dates, Class I
performance was calculated by using the performance of the oldest class of
shares for each Comparable Fund (Class B for MFS Emerging Growth Fund and Class
A for MFS Research and MFS Capital Opportunities Fund), adjusted to reflect that
Class I shares have no front-end load or contingent deferred sales charge. No
adjustment was made for differences in the internal expenses among classes.
(3)MFS also manages three series of the MFS Variable Insurance Trust (VIT)
with substantially similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the
comparable Portfolio Partners Portfolios. The performance of these funds was not
included in the chart because each has a relatively short track record. The
one-year and since inception performance (as of June 30, 1998) of these funds is
as follows: VIT-Emerging Growth Series: 33.72% and 27.38%, respectively
(inception July 24, 1995); VIT-Research Series: 25.78% and 25.24%, respectively
(inception July 26, 1995); and VIT-Value Series: 34.99% and 29.89%, respectively
(inception August 14, 1996).
Form No. X.PPI-98-1 August 12, 1998
