SUPPLEMENT TO PROSPECTUS
OF PORTFOLIO PARTNERS, INC.
This Supplement is dated October 30, 1998
The following information replaces certain information contained in the
Prospectus of Portfolio Partners, Inc. (the "Fund"), dated May 1, 1998, and
should be read in conjunction with that Prospectus. This supplement updates and
replaces a similar supplement dated August 12, 1998.
The section of the Prospectus entitled "PERFORMANCE--PERFORMANCE OF SIMILARLY
MANAGED MUTUAL FUNDS" found on page 13, is hereby replaced with the following:
Each Portfolio is recently organized and has only a short-term performance
record. Each Portfolio, however, has substantially the same investment
objective, policies and strategies as one or more existing mutual funds
("Comparable Funds") that are either sold directly to the public or through
variable products, advised by MFS, Scudder Kemper or T. Rowe Price, as the case
may be.
The historical performance of the Comparable Funds is presented below.
Investors should not consider the performance of the Comparable Funds as an
indication of the future performance of a Portfolio. The performance figures
shown below reflect the deduction of the historical fees and expenses paid by
each Comparable Fund, and not those to be paid by the Portfolio. The figures do
not reflect the deduction of any insurance fees or charges that are imposed by
the insurance company in connection with its sale of the VA Contracts and VLI
Policies. Investors should refer to the separate account prospectuses
describing the VA Contracts and VLI Policies for information pertaining to
these insurance fees and charges. The insurance separate account fees will have
a detrimental effect on the performance of the Portfolios. The results shown
below reflect the reinvestment of dividends and distributions, and were
calculated in the same manner that will be used by each Portfolio to calculate
its own performance.
The following table shows average annual total returns of the Comparable Funds
for the stated periods ending September 30, 1998, as well as a comparison with
the performance of the applicable benchmark.(1)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
One Year Three Years Five Years Ten Years
------------- ------------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MFS Emerging Growth Fund (Class I)(2) (8.92)% 11.89% 15.89% 20.27%
(Model for MFS Emerging Equities)(3)
Russell 2000 (19.02) 6.86 9.09 11.16
Lipper Mid Cap Fund Index (12.30) 8.57 10.87 14.39
MFS Research Fund (Class I)(2) (0.55) 17.55 16.85 16.16
(Model for MFS Research Growth)(3)
Lipper Growth Fund Index 3.07 16.43 15.52 15.01
S&P 500 9.05 22.60 19.91 17.29
MFS Capital Opportunities Fund
(formerly MFS Value Fund) (Class I)(2) 5.41 17.25 17.45 15.63
(Model for MFS Value Equity)(3)
Lipper Capital Appreciation Fund Index (4.10) 11.53 12.27 13.58
S&P 500 9.05 22.60 19.91 17.29
Scudder VLIF International Portfolio (2.98) 8.79 8.94 11.47
(Model for Scudder International Growth)
MSCI EAFE (8.34) 3.75 5.35 5.10
Scudder International Fund (3.10) 8.50 8.64 10.30
(Model for Scudder International Growth)
MSCI EAFE (8.34) 3.75 5.35 5.10
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund 3.48 18.83 17.64 15.58
(Model for T. Rowe Price Growth Equity)
Lipper Growth Fund Index 3.07 16.43 15.52 15.01
S&P 500 9.05 22.60 19.91 17.29
</TABLE>
- ---------------------
(1) The S&P 500 (Standard & Poor's 500) Index is a value-weighted, unmanaged
index of 500 widely held stocks considered to be representative of the stock
market in general. The Russell 2000 Index is a value-weighted, unmanaged index
of small capitalization stocks. The Lipper Mutual Fund Indices are unmanaged,
net-asset-value-weighted indices of the largest qualifying mutual funds within
their respective investment objectives. The Morgan Stanley Capital
International-Europe, Australia, Far East (MSCI EAFE) Index is an unmanaged,
market value-weighted average of the performance of more than 900 securities
listed on the stock exchanges of countries in Europe, Australia and the Far
East. All indices assume reinvestment of all dividends. It is not possible to
invest directly in an index.
Form No. X.PPI-98-2 October 30, 1998
<PAGE>
(2) MFS Emerging Growth Fund and MFS Research Fund commenced offering Class I
shares on January 2, 1997; MFS Capital Opportunities Fund commenced offering
Class I shares on January 3, 1997. For periods preceding those dates, Class I
performance was calculated by using the performance of the oldest class of
shares for each Comparable Fund (Class B for MFS Emerging Growth Fund and Class
A for MFS Research and MFS Capital Opportunities Fund), adjusted to reflect
that Class I shares have no front-end load or contingent deferred sales charge.
No adjustment was made for differences in the internal expenses among classes.
(3) MFS also manages three series of the MFS Variable Insurance Trust (VIT) with
substantially similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the
comparable Portfolio Partners Portfolios. The performance of these funds was
not included in the chart because each has a relatively short track record. The
one-year, three-year and since inception performance (as of September 30, 1998)
of the VIT-Emerging Growth Series and VIT-Research Series funds is as follows:
VIT-Emerging Growth Series: 2.19%, 17.62% and 19.60%, respectively (inception
July 24, 1995); VIT-Research Series: (0.65)%, 16.65% and 17.07%, respectively
(inception July 26, 1995). The one-year and since inception performance (as of
September 30, 1998) of the VIT-Value Series is 5.12% and 17.37%, respectively
(inception August 14, 1996).
Form No. X.PPI-98-2 October 30, 1998
