E TEK DYNAMICS INC
DEF 14A, 1999-09-14
SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES
Previous: SFW HOLDING CORP, 10-Q, 1999-09-14
Next: GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL INC, 10-Q, 1999-09-14




<PAGE> 1
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)

                    INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

                            SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
          PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
                     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. )


Filed by the Registrant [X]

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement     [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission
                                    Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12


                              E-TEK DYNAMICS, INC.
                (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

                -----------------------------------------------
       (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X] No fee required.

[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange  Act Rule  0-11  (set  forth the  amount  on which  the  filing  fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5) Total fee paid:

[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange  Act Rule
0-11(a)(2)  and  identify  the  filing  for  which the  offsetting  fee was paid
previously.  Identify the previous filing by registration  statement  number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid:

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:




<PAGE> 2




                              E-TEK Dynamics, Inc.
                    Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
                               On October 28, 1999




Dear E-TEK Stockholder:

     On Thursday,  October 28, 1999,  E-TEK  Dynamics,  Inc.  will hold its 1999
Annual Meeting of  Stockholders at our  headquarters  at 1865 Lundy Avenue,  San
Jose,  California  95131.  The meeting will begin at 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time, for
the following purposes:

1. To elect one Class I director.

2. To approve the appointment of our independent auditors for fiscal year 2000.

3. To attend to other business properly presented at the meeting.

     Only  stockholders  who owned  stock at the close of business on August 30,
1999 can vote at this meeting or any  adjournments  that may take place. For ten
days prior to the meeting,  a complete list of stockholders  entitled to vote at
the meeting  will be  available  for  examination  by any  stockholder,  for any
purpose relating to the meeting, during ordinary business hours at our principal
offices located at 1865 Lundy Avenue, San Jose, California.

     Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting in person, you are urged to
sign,  date, and return the enclosed proxy card at your earliest  convenience to
ensure the presence of a quorum at the annual meeting.

     If you send in your proxy and then decide to attend the Annual  Meeting to
vote your  shares in person,  you may still do so.  Your proxy is  revocable  in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Proxy Statement.

     Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of the two
proposals outlined in this Proxy Statement.  Please refer to the Proxy Statement
for detailed information on each of the proposals.

     All of us  would  like to express our appreciation for your continued
interest in E-TEK Dynamics.


                                      Very truly yours,
                                      /s/ Michael J. Fitzpatrick
                                          Michael J. Fitzpatrick
September 9, 1999                         Chairman, President
San Jose, California                      and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE> 3


               PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

     The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the "Board")
of E-TEK Dynamics, Inc. for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held
on Thursday,  October 28, 1999, at 4:30 p.m.,  and at any  adjournment  that may
take place.

     The Annual Meeting will be held at E-TEK's headquarters located at 1865
Lundy Avenue, San Jose, California  95131. The date of this Proxy Statement is
September 9, 1999 and we anticipate sending the proxy materials to shareholders
on or about September 27, 1999.

                       SOLICITATION AND VOTING OF PROXIES

     The  following is important  information  in a  question-and-answer  format
regarding the Annual Meeting and this Proxy Statement.

Q:  What may I vote on?

A:  (1) The election of one Class I director to serve on our Board of Directors;
    (2) The approval of the appointment of our  independent  auditors for fiscal
    2000; and
    (3) Any other business properly presented at the meeting.

Q:  How does the Board recommend I vote on the proposals?

A:  The Board  recommends a vote FOR the nominee  standing for  re-election  as
    director  and  FOR  the  appointment  of   PricewaterhouseCoopers   LLP  as
    independent auditors for fiscal 2000.

Q:  Who is entitled to vote?

A   Stockholders  as of the close of business  on August 30, 1999 (the  "Record
    Date") are  entitled to vote at the Annual  Meeting.  Each  shareholder  is
    entitled  to one vote for each  share of Common  Stock  held on the  Record
    Date. As of the Record Date, 66,921,949 shares of E-TEK's Common Stock were
    issued and outstanding.

Q:  How do I vote?

A:  You may vote in person at the Annual  Meeting or by signing and dating each
    proxy card you receive and  returning it in the prepaid  envelope.  You may
    also be able to vote  electronically  via the  Internet or by  telephone as
    outlined on the proxy card.  Please note that there are  separate  Internet
    and  telephone  voting  arrangements,  depending  upon  whether  shares are
    registered in your name or in the name of a broker or bank.

Q:  How can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

A:  You have the right to revoke  your proxy and  change  your vote at any time
    before  the  meeting  by  notifying  our  Secretary,   or  by  returning  a
    later-dated proxy card. You may also revoke your proxy and change your vote
    by voting in person at the meeting.

Q:  What does it mean if I get more than one proxy card?

A:  It means you hold shares registered in more than one account.
    Sign and return all proxies to ensure that all your shares are
    voted.



<PAGE> 4


 Q:  Who will count the vote?

A:   Representatives of EquiServe, E-TEK's transfer agent, will count the votes.
     E-TEK's  corporate  secretary  will appoint an  inspector of election.  The
     procedures  to be  used  by the  inspector  to  count  the  votes  will  be
     consistent with Delaware law concerning  voting of shares and determination
     of a quorum.

Q:   How many votes are needed to approve a proposal?

A:   The number of votes needed to approve a proposal  varies  depending on
     the nature of the proposal.  For the proposals  being presented at the
     1999 Annual  Meeting,  a majority of the shares  voted at the meeting,
     whether  in person or by  proxy,  must vote in favor of the  proposal,
     provided a "quorum" is present at the Meeting. Directors, however, are
     elected by a plurality  of the shares.  A quorum is  one-third  of the
     issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote at a meeting.  They may
     be present at the  meeting or  represented  by proxy.  There must be a
     quorum for the  meeting  to be held and  action to be  validly  taken.
     Abstentions  are not  counted  in the tally of votes FOR or  AGAINST a
     proposal.  A withheld vote is the same as an  abstention.  If a broker
     indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary  authority as
     to certain shares to vote on a particular  matter (broker  non-votes),
     those  shares will be counted as present  with  respect to that matter
     for purposes of establishing a quorum but not for any other purpose.

Q:   How will my proxy be exercised?

A:   All valid proxies received before the meeting will be exercised. All shares
     represented by a proxy will be voted, and where a stockholder  specifies by
     means of his or her proxy a choice  with  respect to any matter to be acted
     upon,  the shares will be voted in  accordance  with the  specification  so
     made.  If no choice is indicated on the proxy,  the shares will be voted in
     favor of the proposals.

Q:   Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

A:   All stockholders as of the Record Date can attend.  If your shares are held
     in the  name of a broker  or other  nominee,  please  bring  proof of stock
     ownership with you to the Annual Meeting.  A copy of your brokerage account
     statement  or an omnibus  proxy  (which you can get from your  broker) will
     serve as proof of stock ownership.

Q:   How will voting on any other business be conducted?

A:   We do not know of any other  business to be  considered  at the 1999 Annual
     Meeting other than the proposals described in this proxy statement.  If any
     other  business is properly  presented at the Annual  Meeting,  your signed
     proxy card gives authority to Michael J. Fitzpatrick,  E-TEK's Chairman and
     Chief  Executive  Officer,  and/or  Sanjay  Subhedar,  E-TEK's  Senior Vice
     President  of  Operations  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  to vote on such
     matters.

Q:   Who pays for the proxy solicitation process?

A:   E-TEK bears the cost of soliciting proxies,  including the reimbursement to
     brokerage firms and other persons representing  beneficial owners of shares
     for their expenses in forwarding  solicitation  material to such beneficial
     owners.



<PAGE> 5



                       PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTOR

     The Board of Directors currently consists of six members. The directors are
divided into three  classes,  designated  Class I, Class II and Class III,  each
serving a  staggered  three-year  term.  Class I, whose terms will expire at our
1999 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, consists of Dr. Joseph W. Goodman and Peter
Y.  Chung;  Class II,  whose  terms will  expire at our 2000  Annual  Meeting of
Stockholders,  consists  of David W.  Dorman and Donald J.  Listwin;  Class III,
whose  terms  expire at our 2001  Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders,  consists of
Michael J. Fitzpatrick and Walter G. Kortschak.

     At each Annual  Meeting of  Stockholders,  directors  will be elected for a
full term of three years to succeed  those  directors  whose terms are expiring.
Management's  nominee to serve as the Class I director is current Class I member
Dr.  Joseph  Goodman.  Peter Y. Chung is not standing for  re-election,  and the
authorized  number  of  directors  will be  reduced  from six to five  effective
immediately upon the expiration of Mr. Chung's term, unless otherwise acted upon
by the Board.  Please see "Information  about E-TEK Dynamics Board of Directors"
for information  concerning the nominee.  If elected,  the nominee will serve as
Director until E-TEK Dynamics' Annual Meeting in 2003 and until his successor is
elected and qualified.

     If any  director is unable to stand for  re-election,  the Board may reduce
the size of the Board,  designate a substitute or leave a vacancy unfilled. If a
substitute is designated, proxies voting on the original director candidate will
be cast for the substituted  candidate.  The Board has no reason to believe that
the nominee will be unwilling or unable to serve if elected as director.  Signed
but unmarked proxies will be voted for election of the nominee to the Board.

     Your Board  unanimously  recommends  a vote FOR the election of the nominee
named above.


                  PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF
               PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     The Audit  Committee  has  recommended,  and the Board  has  approved,  the
appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal
2000  subject  to  your  approval.  PricewaterhouseCoopers  has  served  as  our
independent auditors since 1995. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers  will
attend the Annual Meeting to answer appropriate questions.

     Audit  services  provided  by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  during  fiscal  1999
included  an audit of E-TEK's  consolidated  financial  statements,  a review of
E-TEK's Annual Report and certain other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  ("SEC")  and certain  other  governmental  agencies.  In  addition,
PricewaterhouseCoopers  provided  various  non-audit  services  to E-TEK  during
fiscal 1999.

     In the  event  that  the  stockholders  do not  approve  the  selection  of
PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP, the appointment of the independent auditors will be
reconsidered  by the Board of Directors.  Unless marked to the contrary,  signed
proxies   received  will  be  voted  FOR  ratification  of  the  appointment  of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent auditors for fiscal 2000.

     Your  Board  unanimously   recommends  a  vote  FOR  the  approval  of  the
appointment of  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP as  independent  auditors for fiscal
2000.


     As of the date of this Proxy Statement,  the Board of Directors knows of no
other business that will be conducted at the 1999 Annual Meeting of stockholders
of E-TEK Dynamics other than as described in this Proxy Statement.  If any other
matter or matters are properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournment or
postponement  of the meeting,  it is the  intention of the persons  named in the
accompanying  form of proxy to vote the proxy on such matters in accordance with
their best judgment.



<PAGE> 6


                        INFORMATION ABOUT E-TEK DYNAMICS

Principal Ownership of E-TEK Dynamics Common Stock

     The following  table shows the number of shares of E-TEK Common Stock owned
as of August 30, 1999 by:

o each of our  stockholders who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than
5% of our  common  stock;  o each  of our  directors;  o each  of our  executive
officers listed in the Summary  Compensation  Table;  and o all of our directors
and executive officers as a group.

     Except  as  indicated  herein,  and as  provided  by  applicable  community
property  laws,  the persons named in the table have sole voting and  investment
power with respect to all shares of common stock.

     The number of shares  outstanding  for purposes of the  following  table is
based on 66,921,949  shares  outstanding on August 30, 1999,  plus an additional
400,062  shares  reserved for issuance to certain of the  shareholders  of E-TEK
ElectroPhotonics  Solutions  Corporation  (the  "EPS  shareholders").   The  EPS
shareholders   currently   hold  shares  of  a  subsidiary  of  E-TEK  that  are
exchangeable  into E-TEK common stock for a limited period of time. For purposes
of the Annual Meeting, however, the EPS shareholders do not have a right to vote
their exchangeable shares.

     Beneficial  ownership  is  determined  in  accordance  with  rules  of  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.  For purposes of  calculating  beneficial
ownership,  common stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable
on or  prior  to 60 days  after  August  30,  1999 are  deemed  outstanding  for
computing the percentage  ownership of the person holding such options,  but are
not deemed  outstanding  for  computing  the  percentage  ownership of any other
person.

<TABLE>
                            Principal Stock Ownership
<CAPTION>


Name of Individuals or                                               Percent of
Identity of Group(1)                         Number of Shares          Total
- --------------------------------        -----------------------     ------------
<S>                                          <C>                        <C>
Summit Partners Entities(2)                  19,850,517                 29.7%
Jing Jong Pan(3)                              8,891,000                 13.3
Theresa Pan(4)                                8,139,500                 12.2
Putnam Investments, Inc.(5)                   7,534,472                 11.3
Peter Y. Chung(6)                            19,652,012                 29.4
Walter G. Kortschak(7)                       19,850,517                 29.7
Michael J. Fitzpatrick(8)                     2,402,422                  3.6
David W. Dorman(9)                               50,000                    *
Joseph W. Goodman(9)                             50,000                    *
Donald J. Listwin(9)                             50,000                    *
Ming Shih(10)                                   853,218                  1.3
Sanjay Subhedar(11)                           1,186,695                  1.8
Philip J. Anthony(12)                           152,078                    *
Jim Northington(13)                              65,225                    *
All directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons) (14)                             24,660,155                 36.5
</TABLE>
   *Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of
our common stock.

<PAGE> 7

  (1)  Except as otherwise  noted, the address of each person listed in the
       table is c/o E-TEK Dynamics,  Inc., 1865 Lundy Avenue,  San Jose,
       California 95131.
  (2)  Represents  17,766,213 shares held by Summit Ventures IV, L.P., 1,885,799
       shares held by Summit  Subordinated Debt Fund II, L.P. and 198,505 shares
       held by Summit  Investors III, L.P. The address for these entities is c/o
       Summit  Partners 499 Hamilton  Avenue,  Suite 200, Palo Alto,  California
       94301.
  (3)  Mr. Pan is the spouse of Theresa Pan.
  (4)  Ms. Pan is the spouse of Jing Jong Pan and the sister of Ming Shih.
  (5)  Based on  information  furnished by Putnam in Schedule 13G filed with the
       Securities and Exchange  Commission on September 9, 1999. The address for
       Putnam is One Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109.
  (6)  Represents  17,766,213  shares  held by  Summit  Ventures  IV,  L.P.  and
       1,885,799  shares  held by Summit  Subordinated  Debt Fund II,  L.P.  Mr.
       Chung, a director of E-TEK, is (i) a general partner of Stamps, Woodsum &
       Co. IV, which is the general partner of Summit  Partners IV, L.P.,  which
       is the general  partner of Summit  Ventures  IV, L.P.  and (ii) a general
       partner of  Stamps,  Woodsum & Co. IV,  which is the  general  partner of
       Summit  Ventures  SD II,  LLC,  which is the  general  partner  of Summit
       Subordinated Debt Fund II, L.P. Mr. Chung disclaims  beneficial ownership
       of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
  (7)  Represents  17,766,213 shares held by Summit Ventures IV, L.P., 1,885,799
       shares held by Summit  Subordinated Debt Fund II, L.P. and 198,505 shares
       held by Summit Investors III, L.P. Mr. Kortschak, a director of E-TEK, is
       (i) a Managing Partner of Stamps,  Woodsum & Co. IV, which is the general
       partner  of Summit  Partners  IV L.P.,  which is the  general  partner of
       Summit Ventures IV, L.P. and (ii) a Managing Partner of Stamps, Woodsum &
       Co. IV, which is the general partner of Summit Partners SD II, LLC, which
       is the general  partner of Summit  Subordinated  Debt Fund II,  L.P.  Mr.
       Kortschak is also a Managing  Partner of Summit  Investors  III, L.P. Mr.
       Kortschak  disclaims  beneficial  ownership of such shares  except to the
       extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
  (8)  Includes  126,291  shares of common stock  issuable  upon the exercise of
       options.
  (9)  Represents  shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
       options.
  (10) Ming Shih is the  brother  of Theresa  Pan.  Includes  325,000  shares of
       common stock  issuable  upon the exercise of options.
  (11) Includes  162,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
       options.
  (12) Includes 46,249 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
       options.
  (13) Includes 62,500 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of
       options.
  (14) Includes  shares of common stock of E-TEK  issuable  upon the exercise of
       stock options and shares  beneficially owned by Summit Ventures IV, L.P.,
       Summit  Subordinated  Debt Fund II, L.P. and Summit  Investors III, L.P.,
       with which Messrs. Chung and Kortschak are associated, as to which shares
       they  disclaim  beneficial  ownership,  except  to the  extent  of  their
       pecuniary interest therein.



<PAGE> 8


Board of Directors

     This section provides information concerning the background of the current
directors, including the Class I nominee to be elected at this meeting.

Michael J. Fitzpatrick                              Chairman since April 1999
Age 50                                              Director since October 1997

   Mr. Fitzpatrick has been Chairman of the Board since April 1999 and President
and Chief Executive Officer of E-TEK Dynamics since October 1997. From July 1994
to October 1997, Mr. Fitzpatrick served as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Pacific Telesis  Enterprises,  a service provider.  While at Pacific Telesis,
Mr.  Fitzpatrick  also served as Executive Vice President of Marketing and Sales
from January 1994 to July 1994 and Executive Vice President of Statewide Markets
with Pacific  Bell,  an affiliate of Pacific  Telesis,  from  September  1993 to
January 1994.  From October 1991 to August 1993, Mr.  Fitzpatrick  was President
and Chief Executive Officer of Network Systems  Corporation,  an internetworking
company. Mr. Fitzpatrick also serves as a director of NorthPoint  Communications
Group, Inc., a national provider of local data network services. Mr. Fitzpatrick
received a B.A. from Duke University.

Walter G. Kortschak
Age 40                                                 Director since July 1997

 Mr. Kortschak was Chairman of the Board of Directors from July 1997 until April
1999.  Mr.  Kortschak  is a  Managing  Partner  and  Managing  Member of various
entities affiliated with Summit Partners, L.P., a private equity capital firm in
Palo Alto,  California,  where he has been  employed  since  June  1989.  Summit
Partners,  L.P. and its  affiliates  manage a number of venture  capital  funds,
including  Summit  Ventures  IV, L.P.,  Summit  Investors  III,  L.P. and Summit
Subordinated  Debt Fund II,  L.P.  Mr.  Kortschak  also  serves as a director of
several  privately held  companies.  Mr.  Kortschak  received a B.S. from Oregon
State  University,  an M.S. from The  California  Institute of Technology and an
M.B.A. from the University of California, Los Angeles.

David W. Dorman
Age 45                                                 Director since June 1998

     Mr.  Dorman is the  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the AT&T/BT
Global Venture where he has been employed  since April 1999.  Prior to that, Mr.
Dorman was the  Chairman,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of PointCast
Incorporated,  a company  providing  broadcast  news  through the  Internet  and
corporate  intranets.  Prior to joining  PointCast in November  1997, Mr. Dorman
served as the Executive Vice President of SBC Communications from August 1997 to
November 1997,  following the merger of SBC and Pacific Telesis.  Prior to that,
Mr. Dorman served as President and Chief Executive  Officer of Pacific Bell from
July 1994 to August 1997. From 1981 to July 1994, Mr. Dorman held various senior
management positions at Sprint Corporation,  a  telecommunications  company. Mr.
Dorman  also  serves as a director  of 3Com  Corporation,  Science  Applications
International Corporation, and Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
Mr. Dorman received a B.S. from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Dr. Joseph W. Goodman
Age 63                                               Director since July 1998

 Dr. Goodman has served as Acting Dean of Engineering,  Senior  Associate Dean
of Engineering,  and  Chairman  of the  Department  of  Electrical  Engineering
at Stanford  University.  He has been  employed at Stanford  University  in
various capacities  since  1963,  and has  held the  William  Ayer  Chair of
Electrical Engineering  since 1988. He received a B.A. degree from Harvard
University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Stanford University.  Dr. Goodman has
been nominated for re-election as a Class I director at the 1999 Annual Meeting.



<PAGE> 9


Donald J. Listwin
Age 40                                               Director since July 1998

 Mr. Listwin is an Executive Vice President at Cisco Systems, Inc., where he has
been employed  since 1990. In April 1997,  Mr. Listwin was named the Senior Vice
President of Cisco's  Service  Provider Line of Business.  Prior to that, he was
Senior Vice  President of Cisco's Market  Development  from August 1996 to April
1997,  Vice President and General  Manager of Cisco's Access  Business Unit from
September  1995 to August 1996,  and Vice  President of Marketing from September
1993 to September  1995. Mr. Listwin also serves as a director of TIBCO Software
Inc. and  Software.com.  Mr.  Listwin  received a B.S.  from the  University  of
Saskatchewan, Canada.

Peter Y. Chung                                     Director since December 1998
Age 31
Mr. Chung served as one of our directors from July 1997 until July 1998 and then
rejoined our Board in December 1998.  Mr. Chung is a General  Partner and Member
of various  entities  affiliated  with Summit  Partners,  L.P., a private equity
capital firm in Palo Alto,  California,  where he has been employed since August
1994.  Summit  Partners,  L.P.,  and its  affiliates  manage a number of venture
capital funds,  including  Summit Ventures IV, L.P.,  Summit Investors III, L.P.
and Summit  Subordinated  Debt Fund II, L.P. From August 1989 to July 1992,  Mr.
Chung worked in the Mergers and Acquisitions  Department of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Mr.  Chung also  serves as a director of Splash  Technology  Holdings,  Inc.,  a
developer of color server  systems,  and Ditech  Communications  Corporation,  a
telecommunications   equipment  company,  as  well  as  several  privately  held
companies.  Mr. Chung received a B.A. from Harvard University and an M.B.A. from
Stanford University. Mr. Chung is not standing for re-election as a director.

    Relationships Among Directors or Executive Officers

     There are no family  relationships  among any of the directors or executive
officers of E-TEK.

     Board Meetings and Committees

     The Board held eight meetings  during fiscal 1999 and each of the directors
attended at least 75% of those Board  meetings  held during the period for which
he has been a director.  In addition,  the Board has  established  the following
three standing committees:

     Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee determines compensation
for  E-TEK's  executive  officers  and  administers  our 1998 Stock  Plan,  1998
Director Option Plan and 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  During fiscal 1999,
the  Committee,  which  currently  consists of Walter G.  Kortschak and David W.
Dorman, met eight times and all members attended at least 75% of the meetings.

     Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee makes recommendations  concerning the
engagement of independent public  accountants,  reviews the plans and results of
the audit engagement with E-TEK's  independent public  accountants,  reviews the
independence of E-TEK's independent public  accountants,  considers the range of
audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of E-TEK's internal accounting
controls. During fiscal 1999, the Committee,  which currently consists of Walter
G. Kortschak, Peter Y. Chung and Dr. Joseph W.  Goodman,  met two times and all
members attended at least 75% of the meetings.

     Employee Stock Option Committee. The Employee Stock Option Committee of the
Board of  Directors  determines  stock  option  grants for  employees  below the
executive officer level.  Michael J. Fitzpatrick is currently the only member of
the Employee Stock Option  Committee.  The Employee  Stock Option  Committee was
formed in June 1999 and reviews proposed stock option grants  approximately once
every month.

     The Board currently has no nominating committee or committee performing a
similar function.



<PAGE> 10


     Director Compensation

     Except for the grants of stock options, we do not currently  compensate our
directors.  Directors are  reimbursed  for  out-of-pocket  expenses  incurred in
connection  with  attendance  at  meetings  of the  Board  of  Directors  or any
committees  thereof.  The  directors of our company who are not employees of our
company will receive periodic stock option grants under our 1998 Director Option
Plan.  The directors who are employees of our company are generally  eligible to
participate in our 1998 Stock Plan and in our 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

     The Director Plan provides for the grant of  nonstatutory  stock options to
non-employee  directors  who are not also  partners  or members  of any  venture
capital  investor  which holds more than five  percent  (5%) of the total voting
power of E-TEK's  outstanding  capital  stock.  Each new  director who is not an
employee of E-TEK shall  automatically  be granted an option to purchase  40,000
shares of E-TEK  Common  Stock upon  election to the Board of  Directors  (First
Option) and a further option to purchase  10,000 shares on the date which is two
(2) days after our financial results for the preceding fiscal year are announced
to the public (Subsequent  Option),  if on such date he or she shall have served
on the Board of Directors  for at least six months.  The exercise  price of each
First Option and each  Subsequent  Option shall be 100% of the fair market value
per share of E-TEK Common Stock on the date of grant.

     During fiscal 1999, Messrs. Dorman,  Goodman, and Listwin each were granted
an option to purchase 40,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of
$10.00.

              COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OTHER MATTERS

     The following table sets forth  information  regarding the  compensation of
our Chief  Executive  Officer  and the four most  highly  compensated  executive
officers other than the CEO who were serving as executive officers at the end of
the fiscal year ended June 30,  1999.  Compensation  for fiscal years ended June
30, 1999, 1998 and 1997 is included.

     Other annual  compensation  primarily  represents  imputed  interest income
resulting  from an  interest-free  loan made to several  of the named  executive
officers  to fund the  exercise  of options to purchase  our common  stock.  The
restricted  stock  awards  represent  shares that were  purchased at fair market
value, as determined by our Board of Directors. The awards are subject to rights
of repurchase which lapse periodically over a two- to four-year period.

<TABLE>
                           Summary Compensation Table
<CAPTION>
                                                                Long-Term
                                   Annual Compensation        Compensation
                               -------------------------   -------------------
                                                 Other     Restricted Securities
Name and Principal       Fiscal                  Annual    Stock      Underlying
Positions                Year   Salary  Bonus  Compensation Awards*    Options
- ------------------------ ----   ------  -----  ----------- ---------  ----------
<S>                      <C>  <C>      <C>      <C>         <C>        <C>
Michael J. Fitzpatrick.. 1999 $300,000 $135,000 $387,317       --      433,000
 Chairman of the Board,  1998  188,077  300,000  258,000    2,825,000     --
 President & Chief
 Executive Officer       1997      --        --       --       --         --

Ming Shih..............  1999  204,473   50,000  135,129       --         --
 Senior Vice President,  1998  233,423  215,000  159,000    1,111,111  500,000
 Sales & Marketing       1997  190,769 1,815,577      --       --         --

Sanjay Subhedar......... 1999  196,634   45,000  231,111       --      300,000
 Senior Vice President,  1998   86,154       --       --    1,200,000     --
 Operations, and Chief   1997      --        --       --       --         --
 Financial Officer

Philip J. Anthony........1999  166,920   69,200   63,239       --       50,000
 Vice President of       1998      --        --       --      125,000  125,000
 Engineering             1997      --        --       --       --         --

Jim Northington........  1999  138,458   12,433       --       --       225,000
 Vice President          1998      --        --       --       --         --
 of Manufacturing        1997      --        --       --       --         --

</TABLE>
*    As of June 30, 1999, the value of 2,475,000  restricted  shares held by Mr.
     Fitzpatrick was $117,717,188;  the value of 758,218  restricted shares held
     by Mr. Shih was $36,062,744;  the value of 1,125,000 restricted shares held
     by Mr. Subhedar was $53,507,813, and the value of 125,000 restricted shares
     held by Mr. Anthony was $5,953,125



<PAGE> 11


     Option Grant Summary

     The following table presents additional  information  concerning the option
awards shown in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 1999.

     All  options  were  granted at an  exercise  price equal to the fair market
value of our common stock as determined by our Board of Directors on the date of
the grant.  Our common stock was not  publicly  traded at the time of the option
grants listed below.

     Potential  realizable  values are net of exercise  price,  but before taxes
associated with the exercise. Amounts represent hypothetical gains that could be
achieved for the respective  options if exercised at the end of the option term.
The  assumed  5% and 10%  rates of stock  price  appreciation  are  provided  in
accordance  with rules of the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and do not
represent our estimate or  projection  of the future common stock price.  Actual
gains, if any, on stock option exercises are dependent on the future performance
of our common stock, overall market conditions and the option holders' continued
employment through the vesting period.

<TABLE>
                          Option Grants in Fiscal 1999
<CAPTION>

                        % of Total
            Number of   Options to                         Potential Realizable
            Securities  Granted    Exercise                     Value at
            Underlying  Employees  or Base               Assumed Annual Rates of
            Options     in Fiscal  Price    Expiration  Stock Price Appreciation
Name        Granted *   Year       Per Share  Date           for Option Term
- ----        ---------   -------    --------  -------      ----------------------
                                                             5%           10%
                                                           --------     --------
<S>          <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>            <C>          <C>
Michael J.
 Fitzpatrick  433,000   14.1%    $10.00     7/30/08      $2,723,114   $6,900,905

Philip J.
 Anthony       50,000    1.6      10.00     7/30/08         314,447      796,871

Jim
 Northington  200,000    6.5      10.00     7/30/08       1,257,789    3,187,485
               25,000    0.8      24.625    1/13/09         387,163      981,148
Ming
 Shih             --      --        --        --              --           --

Sanjay
 Subhedar     300,000    9.8      10.00     7/30/08       1,886,684    4,781,227

</TABLE>

*    With the  exception  of Mr.  Subhedar,  all of the options  included  above
     become  exercisable  at a rate of  one-quarter of the shares subject to the
     option one year after the date of the grant and an  additional  1/48 of the
     shares at the end of each month thereafter, subject to continued service as
     an employee.  One quarter of Mr.  Subhedar's  options vested on December 2,
     1998, an additional  one quarter vested on July 30, 1999, and the remaining
     options will vest at the rate of 2% per month for 24 months.

Aggregated Option Exercises and Year-End Values

     The following  table sets forth the number of shares acquired and the value
realized upon  exercise of stock options  during fiscal year 1999 and the number
of shares of our common stock subject to exercisable and  unexercisable  options
held as of June 30, 1999 by each of the executive  officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table.
<PAGE> 12
     The value of "in-the-money" stock options represents the positive spread
between the  exercise  price of options and the fair market value of the
underlying shares on June 30, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Number of                 Number of
           Shares      Value     Securities Underlying    Value of Unexercised
           Acquired    Realized  Unexercised Options     In-the-Money Options
Name       on Exercise ($)       at Fiscal Year End       at Fiscal Year End($)
- ----       ----------  --------  ------------------       ---------------------
                             Exercisable/Unexercisable Exercisable/Unexercisable
<S>             <C>     <C>        <C>       <C>           <C>           <C>

Michael J.
 Fitzpatrick     0     $ 0.00          0    433,000          $  0   $ 12,286,375

Philip J.
 Anthony         0       0.00     31,250    143,750       886,719      4,078,906

Jim
 Northington     0       0.00          0    225,000             0      6,018,750

Ming
 Shih            0       0.00    300,000    200,000    10,537,500      7,025,000

Sanjay
 Subhedar        0       0.00     75,000    225,000     2,128,125      6,384,375

</TABLE>


<PAGE> 13

Employment Agreements and Change of Control Arrangements

     On October 1, 1997, we entered into an employment agreement with Michael J.
Fitzpatrick to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement
provides that Mr. Fitzpatrick is an "at-will"  employee,  that he will be paid a
minimum base salary of $300,000 per annum (subject to annual  review),  and that
he will be eligible to receive an annual bonus of up to $300,000.  The agreement
also provides that if Mr. Fitzpatrick  is terminated  for any reason other than
"cause," or if he resigns for "good reason":

         - he will be  entitled  to  receive a  severance  payment in an amount
     equal to his  monthly  base salary and pro rated bonus until the earlier of
     the expiration of 12 months or his  commencement of employment with another
     firm; and

         - the  vesting  of all of his  options  and  restricted  stock will be
     accelerated by 12 months.

     In  addition,   the   agreement provides  that  in  the  event  that  Mr.
Fitzpatrick's  employment  with us is  terminated  by him or us  within 6 months
following a "change of control" of E-TEK,  the vesting of all of his options and
restricted stock will be fully accelerated and Mr.  Fitzpatrick will be entitled
to receive a severance  payment in an amount  equal to two times his base salary
and bonus.

     On December 2, 1997,  we entered into an employment  agreement  with Sanjay
Subhedar  to  serve as our Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer.  The
agreement provides that Mr. Subhedar is an "at-will"  employee,  that he will be
paid a minimum base salary of $175,000 per annum (subject to annual review), and
that he will be  eligible  to receive  an annual  bonus of up to  $100,000.  The
agreement also provides that if Mr.  Subhedar is terminated for any reason other
than "cause," or if he resigns for "good reason":

        - he will be entitled to receive a severance  payment in an amount equal
     to his monthly base salary until the earlier of the expiration of 12 months
     or his commencement of employment with another firm; and

         - the  vesting  of all of his options and restricted stock will be
     accelerated by 12 months.

     In addition,  the agreement provides that upon a "change of control" of
E-TEK, the  vesting  of all of his  options and  restricted  stock  will  be
accelerated by 12 months (but  will not be further  accelerated  beyond  the
acceleration described in the foregoing sentence upon any subsequent termination
of his employment with us following a change of control).

     On May 26, 1998,  we entered into an employment agreement  with Philip J.
Anthony to serve as our Vice President of  Engineering. The agreement provides
that Mr.  Anthony  will be an  "at-will"  employee,  that he will be paid a base
salary of $160,000  per annum  (subject to annual  review), and that he will be
entitled to receive a bonus of up to 30% of his then current base salary.  The
agreement also provides that in the event that Mr. Anthony is terminated for any
reason other than "cause," or if he resigns for "good reason":

        - he will be entitled to receive a severance  payment in an amount equal
     to his monthly base salary until the earlier of the expiration of 12 months
     or his commencement of employment with another firm; and

        - the  vesting  of all of his  options  and  restricted  stock  will  be
     accelerated by 12 months.

     On July  21,  1998,  we  entered  into an  employment  agreement  with  Jim
Northington  to serve as our Vice  President  of  Manufacturing.  The  agreement
provides that Mr.  Northington  will be an "at-will"  employee,  that he will be
paid a base salary of $160,000 per annum (subject to annual review), and that he
will be  entitled  to  receive  a bonus  of up to 30% of his then  current  base
salary.

Certain Transactions

     From  time to time we have  made  interest-free  loans  to  certain  of our
executive officers to fund the exercise of stock options held by these executive

<PAGE> 14


officers.  These loans are  evidenced  by  promissory  notes which mature on the
dates set forth below,  subject to certain acceleration events. These promissory
notes are secured by the shares of common stock  purchased  with the proceeds of
these loans,  and are either full recourse or substantial  recourse  against the
assets of the borrower.  The following table sets forth the name and position of
the relevant officers,  certain information with respect to the promissory notes
issued to  evidence  such  loans,  and the number of shares of our common  stock
purchased with the proceeds of these loans.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                        Principal         Shares        Issuance    Maturity
Name                       Amount         Purchased      Date        Date
- ---------------        -----------        ---------     --------     -----------
<S>                     <C>               <C>           <C>         <C>
Michael J. Fitzpatrick  $5,198,000        2,260,000     11/13/97    11/13/2002
                         1,299,500          565,000     11/13/97    11/13/2002

Sanjay Subhedar          3,900,000        1,200,000     12/11/97    12/11/2002

Ming Shih                1,277,776          555,555     07/23/97    07/23/2006
                         1,277,778          555,556     07/23/97    07/23/2006

Philip J. Anthony        1,250,000          125,000     06/25/98    06/25/2003
</TABLE>

     During  fiscal 1999,  Mr.  Fitzpatrick  paid  $805,000,  Mr.  Subhedar paid
$243,750, and Mr. Shih paid $2,094,133 against their loans.

     Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

     The Compensation  Committee of the Board of Directors currently consists of
two directors who are not employees of E-TEK. The Committee reviews and approves
salaries,  bonuses and other benefits payable to E-TEK's executive officers.  It
also  administers  E-TEK's  employee  stock option  plans.  During  fiscal 1999,
Messrs. Dorman and Kortschak served as members of the compensation  committee of
E-TEK's  Board of  Directors.  Mr.  Fitzpatrick  also  served as a member of the
compensation committee for a portion of fiscal 1999, but no longer serves on the
committee.  There are no  interlocking  relationships  between our directors and
executive officers and those of any other public company.

     Compensation Goals. The Compensation Committee establishes compensation for
executive  officers  to  align  business  objectives  with  performance,  and to
attract,  retain and reward  executive  officers who contribute to our long-term
success.  The Committee and the Board consult with management  regarding E-TEK's
stock option and stock purchase plans, compensation policies, compensation to be
offered to new executive hires, and executive performance reviews. The Committee
reviews and approves  performance  incentive payments and stock option grants to
executive  officers.  Our compensation  programs,  including those for executive
officers, share these characteristics:

        - We offer a compensation  program,  including competitive base salaries
     and, where appropriate, relocation benefits, to attract and retain the best
     people in the industry.  To ensure that pay is  competitive,  we review the
     compensation practices of other leading companies in the industry.

        - We pay for  relative  sustained  performance.  Executive  officers are
     rewarded based upon corporate,  departmental,  and individual  performance.
     Corporate and departmental  performance are evaluated by reviewing  whether
     strategic  and  business  plan  goals are met.  Individual  performance  is
     evaluated by measuring organizational progress against set objectives.

        - We strive for  fairness to achieve a balance in  compensation  paid to
     the executives  within E-TEK and in comparable  companies.  We believe that
     the  contributions  of each member of the executive  staff are vital to our
     success.

        - We believe that employees should understand the performance evaluation
     and compensation  programs.  At the beginning of the performance cycle, key
     semi-annual  and  annual  objectives  are set for each  officer.  The chief
     executive officer gives ongoing feedback on performance to each officer. At
     the end of the performance cycle, the Compensation  Committee evaluates the
     accomplishments  of the key  objectives  in making its  decisions  on merit
     increases and stock option grants.


<PAGE> 15


     Compensation  Components.  E-TEK's compensation program has three elements,
base salary, benefits, and at risk compensation.  Combined, these three elements
should yield a total  compensation  package that is competitive in the industry.
In addition to base salary, officers participate in a Performance Incentive Plan
(PIP) that is based on the  individual's  annual  performance and achievement of
corporate and departmental objectives. Our compensation packages are intended to
attract  and retain  highly  skilled  employees,  provide  useful  products  and
services  to  customers,   enhance  shareholder  value,  motivate  technological
innovation, and reward performance.

     Base Salary.  The Committee  sets base salary for officers by reviewing the
compensation  levels  for  similar  positions  in  comparable  companies  in the
industry. Base salaries are adjusted based on the individual's performance.

     Performance  Incentive Plan.  Bonuses for eligible  executive  officers are
paid as a  percentage  of their base salary and on the basis of E-TEK's  overall
achievement  of  certain  corporate  financial  and  operational  goals  and  on
individual achievement.

     Employee Stock Purchase Plan.  E-TEK's 1998 Purchase Plan helps us meet the
objective of retaining highly skilled employees by allowing  eligible  employees
to  purchase  Common  Stock  through  payroll  deductions  of up to  10%  of the
participant's  compensation  during  six-month  purchase  periods  as defined by
E-TEK.  The  price  of the  stock  purchased  under  the 1998  Purchase  Plan is
generally  85% of the lower of the fair market  value of the Common Stock (i) at
the beginning of the offering period or (ii) at the end of the purchase period.

     Stock  Options.  Our 1998 Stock Plan  provides  for the grant of  incentive
stock options to employees  (including  officers and employee directors) and for
the grant of nonstatutory  stock options and stock purchase rights to employees,
directors  and  consultants.  The Stock Plan seeks to align the interests of our
employees with those of our  stockholders  and nurture our employees'  long-term
interest in E-TEK's  success.  The options become  available for purchase over a
defined period to encourage  employees to continue their  employment with E-TEK.
We determine  the number of stock  options to be granted by  evaluating  several
factors  such as  individual  performance,  overall  compensation  level for the
individual,  the  importance  to  E-TEK  of  retaining  the  individual  in  the
long-term, other E-TEK equity ownership by the individual, and equity incentives
provided in the industry and to  individuals  with similar  responsibilities  at
other companies.

     Chief  Executive  Officer  Compensation.  Michael J.  Fitzpatrick  has been
E-TEK's  President and Chief  Executive  Officer  since October 1997.  His total
compensation consists of base salary,  incentive compensation and employee stock
options. In determining Mr. Fitzpatrick's compensation,  the Committee considers
the factors set forth above and also evaluates:

       - Compensation paid to chief executive officers of comparable companies
       - Corporate performance
       - His individual performance
       - Compensation paid to E-TEK's other executive officers

     For  fiscal  year  1999,  Mr.  Fitzpatrick's   salary  was  $300,000.   Mr.
Fitzpatrick's  salary was  established  at the time of his hire in October 1997.
The Compensation  Committee has reviewed Mr.  Fitzpatrick's  accomplishments and
established  performance  objectives for him. Because Mr.  Fitzpatrick and E-TEK
achieved  certain  performance  objectives  for  fiscal  1998  and  successfully
completed E-TEK's initial public offering,  he received  performance  vesting of
376,667  shares in fiscal  1999,  in  accordance  with a November  3, 1997 stock
option  agreement.  He also  received a stock option  grant and cash  incentives
during fiscal 1999 for the  achievement  of financial,  operational,  and market
objectives  relating  to  fiscal  1998  and  the  first  half  of  fiscal  1999.
Accordingly,  he received cash  incentive  payments of $135,000 and, on July 30,
1998,  was granted  options to  purchase  433,000  shares of Common  Stock at an
exercise  price  of  $10.00.  These  options  are  for a  10-year  term  and are
exercisable  at a rate of 1/4 of the shares subject to the option one year after
the date of the grant and an  additional  1/48 of the  shares at the end of each
month  thereafter,  beginning on July 30, 1999. Mr.  Fitzpatrick  elected not to
take a bonus  payable to him for  achievement  of  performance  targets  for the
second half of fiscal 1999.  Mr.  Fitzpatrick's  equity  ownership in E-TEK also
includes  shares of Common Stock as set forth in the Principal  Stock  Ownership
Table  on  page  4  of  this  proxy  statement.  We  believe  Mr.  Fitzpatrick's


<PAGE> 16


compensation is strongly  aligned with the interests of  stockholders  since his
compensation  has been linked to specific  company  and  individual  performance
measures.

     Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors       Walter G. Kortschak
                                                                David W. Dorman

     Other Matters

     Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

     Based on a review of forms  filed or written  notice  that no annual  forms
were  required,  we believe that from December 2, 1998 to June 30, 1999, all SEC
filings of our officers,  directors and ten percent  shareholders  complied with
the  requirements  of  Section  16 of the  Securities  Exchange  Act,  with  one
exception.  An  acquisition  of  5,000  shares  of  E-TEK  Common  Stock  by Jim
Northington,   Vice  President  of  Manufacturing,   on  December  7,  1998  was
inadvertently  reported one month late on a Form 4 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 5, 1999.


<PAGE> 16



                        COMPARISON OF STOCKHOLDER RETURN


     The following  graph compares the cumulative  total  stockholder  return on
E-TEK's Common Stock since the date of our initial public offering  (December 1,
1998)  through the fiscal year ended June 30,  1999,  with the CRSP Total Return
Index  for  the  NASDAQ  Stock  Market  - US  Index  and the  NASDAQ  Electronic
Components  Index.  The total  return  values  are  prepared  by the  Center for
Research in Security Prices (CRSP) at the University of Chicago.  The Electronic
Components Index consists of  approximately  190 companies listed on the NASDAQ.
The graph is based on the  assumption  that $100 was invested in each of E-TEK's
Common  Stock,  the NASDAQ  Stock  Market - US Index and the  NASDAQ  Electronic
Components  Index on December 1, 1998. The stock price  performance on the graph
is not necessarily an indicator of future price performance.

                        [PERFORMANCE GRAPH APPEARS HERE]

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                12/1/98 12/31/98 1/29/99 2/26/99 3/31/99 4/30/99 5/28/99 6/30/99
- -------------   ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S>              <C>     <C>      <C>    <C>     <C>     <C>      <C>     <C>
E-TEK
Dynamics, Inc.    $100   $223    $250    $283    $299    $358     $302    $396

NASDAQ Stock
Market-US Index   $100   $110    $126    $114    $123    $126     $123    $134

NASDAQ Electronic
Components Index  $100   $106    $124    $107    $111    $117     $109    $126
</TABLE>


<PAGE>17


                      STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED
                             AT NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

     Proposals  of  stockholders  intended  to be  presented  at the next annual
meeting of the  stockholders  of the Company  must be received by the  Corporate
Secretary  of E-TEK at its offices at 1865 Lundy  Avenue,  San Jose,  California
95131, no later than May 12, 2000, and satisfy the conditions established by the
Securities and Exchange  Commission for stockholder  proposals to be included in
the Company's proxy statement for that meeting.

                          TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS

     We know of no  other  matters  to be  presented  for  consideration  at the
meeting.  If any other  matters  properly  come before the meeting,  the persons
named in the  enclosed  proxy card intend to vote the shares they  represent  in
accordance with their best judgment.


                                  By Order of the Board of Directors,
                                           /s/ William Gerson
                                               William N. Gerson
                                               Secretary

San Jose, California
September 9, 1999




<PAGE> 18


                          [FORM OF FRONT OF PROXY CARD]

                              E-TEK DYNAMICS, INC.
                                1865 Lundy Avenue
                           San Jose, California 95131
                Annual Meeting of Stockholders - October 28, 1999
               Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors

         The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Michael J.
Fitzpatrick and Sanjay  Subhedar as Proxies,  with full power of substitution to
each, to vote for and on behalf of the undersigned at the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of E-TEK Dynamics,  Inc. to be held at E-TEK's headquarters at 1865
Lundy Avenue, San Jose, California 95131, on Thursday, October 28, 1999, at 4:30
p.m., and at any adjournment or  adjournments  thereof.  The undersigned  hereby
directs  the said  proxies to vote in  accordance  with their  judgement  on any
matters which may properly come before the Annual  Meeting,  all as indicated in
the Notice of Annual Meeting,  receipt of which is hereby  acknowledged,  and to
act on the  following  matters  set  forth in such  notice as  specified  by the
undersigned.

THIS PROXY,  WHEN  PROPERLY  EXECUTED,  WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED  HEREIN BY THE
UNDERSIGNED  STOCKHOLDER(S).  IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED
"FOR" PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.

PLEASE  VOTE,  DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE  AND  RETURN  PROMPTLY  IN THE  ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.

                          [FORM OF BACK OF PROXY CARD]
Dear Stockholder:

Please take note of the important  information  enclosed with this Proxy Ballot.
There are a number of issues  related to the  management  and  operation of your
Corporation  that require  your  immediate  attention  and  approval.  These are
discussed in detail in the enclosed proxy materials.

Your vote counts, and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote
your  shares.  Please  mark the boxes on this  proxy card to  indicate  how your
shares will be voted.  Then sign the card,  detach it and return your proxy vote
in the enclosed postage paid envelope.

Your vote must be received  prior to the Annual Meeting of  Stockholders,  to be
held on Thursday, October 28, 1999.

Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters.

Sincerely,

E-TEK Dynamics, Inc.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the proposals outlined below.

1.Election of Director to a term expiring at the 2002 Annual Meeting of
  Stockholders.
Nominee: Dr. Joseph W. Goodman
/ / FOR     / / WITHHELD

2. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP as independent
auditors of the Company.
/ / FOR / / AGAINST / / ABSTAIN

3. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon any other
business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment(s)
thereof.

MARK HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT LEFT   / /

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the books of the Company. Joint
owners should each sign personally.  Trustees, custodians, and other fiduciaries
should  indicate the  capacity in which they sign,  and where more than one name
appears,  a  majority  must  sign.  If the  stockholder  is a  corporation,  the
signature should be that of an authorized officer who should indicate his or her
title.

Signature..............................        Date...............
Signature..............................        Date...............


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission