JAINDL FREDERICK J
DFAN14A, 2000-04-13
Previous: JUNIPER NETWORKS INC, DEF 14A, 2000-04-13
Next: GOLDMAN SACHS VARIABLE INSURANCE TRUST, 485BPOS, 2000-04-13




                           MASSACHUSETTS FINCORP, INC.
                     COMMITTEE TO ENHANCE STOCKHOLDER VALUE
                                ("THE COMMITTEE")

April 11, 2000

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

     Thank you for the  overwhelming  support  and  encouragement  that you have
extended to the Committee.  With your backing, the stockholders of Massachusetts
Fincorp, Inc. will send an important message to Management.  That message, which
I have heard clearly from many stockholders, includes:

*    Stockholders  will not stand by as Management  squanders  money,  including
     $2.2 million on executive offices. I have heard from stockholders that live
     in  Massachusetts  and have  been to the new  building.  They are also very
     upset with the $975,000 that the Board paid for the one-acre parcel of land
     and the  $1,250,000  paid  for the new  offices.  We do not  believe  these
     expenditures are an efficient use of stockholders money.

*    Stockholders will not be misled by the half-truths and excuses expressed by
     Management  in  prior  letters.  Management  will be held  accountable  for
     declining earnings and mismanagement of the Company.

*    Management  must stop wasting  money in failed  attempts to entrench  their
     positions.

     While the stockholders message has been firmly stated, I ask that you again
vote "For" the  Committee  Nominees.  This will make our message even  stronger.
Remember, only the last proxy card you vote will count.


                         Even if you have already voted,
          Vote "FOR" the Committee Nominees on the White proxy card and
                       return it in the enclosed envelope.


Spence Limited, LP votes "FOR" the Committee Nominees

John Spence,  one of the  Company's  largest  shareholders,  is  supporting  the
Committee  Nominees.  Mr. Spence,  who owns over 6% of the outstanding shares of
the Company  through Spence  Limited,  LP, and is an authority in analyzing bank
and thrift stocks,  recently wrote the following  letter to the Company's Board.
The opinions  expressed in Mr.  Spence's  letter below are his own and he is not
affiliated with any member of the Committee.

<PAGE>

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              SPENCE LIMITED, L.P.

                               4712 Clendenin Road
                             Nashville,TN 37220-1004

                              Phone: (615) 321-3774
                               Fax: (615)321-9736

                                 April 10, 2000

         To the Board of Directors of Massachusetts Fincorp, Inc.:

                  I have given careful consideration to the
         information presented to the shareholders by both the
         Committee to Enhance Stockholder Value and the
         Company.  After a great deal of analysis, which
         included discussions with Mr. Green and Mr. Jaindl, I
         am supporting and voting "FOR" Mr. Jaindl and the
         Committee Nominees.  The shareholders need independent
         directors like Mr. Jaindl, Mr. Schantz and Mr. Buck
         who will assure that the best interests of all
         shareholders are represented

                                                         Sincerely,


                                                         John W. Spence III
                                                         General Partner
         cc:      Mark W. Jaindl
                  Paul C. Green

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------





    Don't Let Management Divert Your Attention from Their Failure to Perform
             Massachusetts Fincorp, Not American Bank, Is the Issue

     Because they cannot defend their own  performance,  Management has taken to
attacking the  performance of American Bank. We do not want  stockholders  to be
sidetracked. For the record, however, stockholders should know that:

*    American  Bank is a start-up  bank that first  commenced  business  in June
     1997. American Bank achieved profitability after approximately 2.5 years of
     business,  compared  to the  average  3.1  years  it takes  for a  start-up
     financial institution to first achieve profitability.

<PAGE>


*    In its less than three years of  operations,  American  Bank has  generated
     more assets  ($112  million  vs. $98.  million)  and more  deposits  ($89.1
     million vs.  $63.1  million)  than  Massachusetts  Fincorp has been able to
     generate after more than ninety-two years of business!

*    American  Bank has had an  improving  earnings  performance  since it began
     business,  while  Massachusetts  Fincorp has realized declining earnings in
     every quarter since it became a public company.

     Don't be distracted by Management's latest tactics. Neither I, nor American
Bank,  want to operate  the  Company.  The  Committee  will work hard to improve
profitability and enhance stockholder value at Massachusetts  Fincorp,  and will
speak on behalf of the initiation of a stock  repurchase  program and the review
of a sale of the Bank at a reasonable price.


                    Don't Let Management Distort the Facts -
                          Let's Set the Record Straight

*    Although  Management suggests that the Committee would sell the Company for
     a distressed  price, the three Nominees together cannot force a sale of the
     Company.  Remember  that if the Committee  Nominees are elected,  they will
     represent only 3 of 11 directors.  At least 3 of the existing  directors of
     the Company would have to agree with the Committee  Nominees  before a sale
     could occur.

*    Management  expects a "pat on the back" for a very modest increase in stock
     price since  December  1998.  When the Committee  began buying stock in May
     1999,  the common  stock was selling for $9.125 per share,  or 9% below the
     IPO price.  We  believe  that the price  increase  cited by  Management  is
     attributable  to the  Committee's  purchases  and our actions in  demanding
     better  performance  from the  Company.  We believe that the price would be
     higher if  Management  would  have  taken the  Committee's  suggestion  and
     implemented a stock buyback program.

*    Management again tries to mislead stockholders by suggesting they own "over
     30% of the combined  shares." What they fail to clarify is that 8% of those
     shares  are held in the ESOP plan,  which  reduced  stockholders  equity by
     $436,380 and continues to cost  shareholders  money each year while costing
     Management nothing.  Another 10% is being awarded through stock options. In
     addition,  4% is held in a Stock  Awards  Plan.  During  1999  the  Company
     awarded  21,815 shares with a market value of $267,780 to Board Members and
     Management,  at no cost to them!  The  shareholders  are  paying  for these
     shares, not Management.

<PAGE>



                         ITS UP TO YOU, THE STOCKHOLDERS
                  THESE ARE THE FACTS AND THEY ARE UNDISPUTED.



*    NET INCOME HAS DECLINED IN EVERY  QUARTER  SINCE THE COMPANY WENT PUBLIC IN
     DECEMBER  1998.  While  Management  wants  you to  believe  that  declining
     earnings are  acceptable due to an increase in interest  rates,  the bottom
     line has not declined at "all  companies  whose core business  involves the
     origination and sale of mortgage loans". While Management continues to make
     excuses for their poor performance,  we are hearing one very clear message.
     The business  strategy which Management is executing is failing  miserably.
     If we  continue  to allow  these  people  to run our  Company  without  any
     supervision, we are sure to watch our investment fail.

*    WASTEFUL   EXPENDITURE  OF  STOCKHOLDERS'   INVESTMENT.   Measured  by  its
     efficiency ratio (which is non-interest  expense as a percent of the sum of
     net interest  income and  non-interest  income),  the Company is one of the
     least efficient (i.e., costliest to operate) of all publicly traded thrifts
     in Massachusetts.

*    $2,200,000 FOR NEW EXECUTIVE OFFICES.  The board approved the purchase of a
     one-acre parcel of land in Quincy,  Massachusetts for $975,000 and spent an
     additional $1,250,000 to remove an existing structure and construct the new
     executive headquarters.

You Can Call If You Have Questions

     If you have any questions or require any  assistance,  please  contact Mark
Jaindl  at (610)  336-0653  ext.  112,  or our  proxy  solicitors,  Beacon  Hill
Partners, at (800) 755-5001.

     Even if you have already voted, Vote again "FOR" the Committee  Nominees on
the White proxy card and return it in the enclosed envelope.


          WE REQUEST THAT YOU NOT RETURN THE COMPANY'S BLUE PROXY CARD

     The  Committee  believes  that it is in your  best  interest  to elect  the
Committee  Nominees as Directors at the Annual Meeting.  The Committee  Strongly
Recommends a Vote "FOR" the Committee Nominees.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            /s/ Mark W. Jaindl
                                            The Committee to Enhance Stockholder
                                            Value


           PLEASE SIGN AND DATE YOUR WHITE PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN
                                ----------------
                              THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE



© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission