YP NET INC
8-K/A, 2000-05-22
COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES
Previous: YP NET INC, 8-K, 2000-05-22
Next: CLAIMSNET COM INC, 10-Q, 2000-05-22




                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                  _____________


                                    FORM 8-KA

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date  of  report  (Date  of  earliest  event  reported)          March  13, 2000
                                                                 ---------------


                                   YP.Net.Inc
                                   -----------
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


        Nevada                      0-24217                     85-026668
        ------                      -------                     ---------
(State or Other Jurisdiction     (Commission                 (IRS  Employer
     of  Incorporation)          File  Number)             Identification  No.)


4840  East  Jasmine  Street,  Suite  110,  Mesa,  Arizona               85205
- ---------------------------------------------------------               -----
(Address  of Principal Executive Offices)                             (Zip Code)


Registrant's  telephone  number,  including  area  code          (480)  654-9646
                                                                 ---------------


                                       N/A
                                       ---
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


<PAGE>
ITEM  4.  CHANGES  IN  REGISTRANT'S  CERTIFYING  ACCOUNTANT

     On  March 14, 2000, Registrant filed its Form 8-K indicating (Item 4) those
pertinent  matters  incident  to a full disclosure pursuant to Item 304(a)(3) of
Regulation  S-K  relating  to  a  change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

     Although  McGladrey  & Pullen, LLP, did furnish to the Commission its March
22,  2000,  letter  that  incorporated its February 4, 2000, letter addressed to
Registrant, inadvertently, Registrant failed (i) to include as an Exhibit to its
March  14,  2000  Form 8-K as filed with the Commission, the McGladrey & Pullen,
LLP  letter  dated  February  4,  2000,  attached hereto;  and,  (ii) Registrant
further failed to deliver to McGladrey  &  Pullen, LLP, a copy of its definitive
Form  8-K  dated  March  14,  2000.

     The  purpose of this Form 8-KA is to amend the failings of Registrant noted
above.  A  copy  of  this  Form 8-KA, together with a copy of the Form 8-K dated
March  14,  2000, as previously filed with the Commission will also be delivered
to  McGladrey  &  Pullen,  LLP,  concurrently with the filing of this Form 8-KA.

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to  the  requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to  be  signed on its behalf by the
undersigned  hereunto  duly  authorized.

                                        YP.NET.INC.


Date:     May  19,  2000                By:     /s/  Angelo  Tullo
          --------------                             ------------------------
                                                     Angelo  Tullo,  Chairman


<PAGE>
February  4,  2000

Board  of  Directors
YP.Net,  Inc
4840  East  Jasmine  Street,  #105
Mesa,  Arizona  85205


Dear  Sir's:

As you requested in our meeting on February 3, 2000, we are providing additional
information  and  recapping  the  points  covered  in  the  meeting.

     1.   Due to the  change  in the  Board  of  Directors  and the  changes  in
          management,  we need  to  perform  our  internal  client  reevaluation
          procedures.  In connection therewith, we need the Public Record Search
          Request form for all the Directors and management as soon as possible.
          This process must be completed and accepted before we will perform any
          further substantive audit procedures.
     2.   We are having  significant  difficulties  completing  the audit of the
          Company's financial statements.  As you know, the Company's Form 1OKSR
          was due at the end of December 1999; a notification of late filing was
          submitted  to the SEC and the 15 day "grace  period"  provided  in the
          notification  of late filing has expired.  Since we have not completed
          the  audit  and will  need to  perform  substantial  procedures  after
          management or others  produce the missing  information,  we are not in
          position to reach any opinion on the financial  statements  taken as a
          whole.  However,  we have identified  indications  that past financial
          statements are likely to be materially misstated. These matters effect
          a number of your past  filings  under the  Securities  Exchange Act of
          1934 such as the Form IOQSB, 1OKSB and 8K's tiled in the past year. We
          previously  provided  management with  descriptions of the significant
          accounting issues and lists of information we are missing. Attached is
          a list of the most  significant  issues we  discussed  with you. It is
          important to understand that as the requested information is provided,
          it is likely that more questions will arise and more  information will
          be needed.
     3.   We indicated to you that we are evaluating our responsibilities  under
          Section LOA of  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934.  We have  included a
          photocopy of 17 CFR Parts 210 and 240,  Implementation  of Section 1OA
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for your review.  Under Section
          10A,  we are waiting to hear your timely  response  for your  remedial
          actions with respect to the Company's  financial  statements.  We need
          you to respond to us in writing by February 8, 2000.
     4.   We have included information for your review on accounting for reverse
          acquisitions. This includes portions of the November 1999 paper issued
          by the staff  members of the  Division of  Corporation  Finance of the
          Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  portions  of the  Division  of
          Corporation Finance Accounting Disclosure Rules and Practices Training
          Manual and portions of the Arthur Andersen publication  Accounting for
          Business Combinations

We  want  to re-iterate that we need you to respond to us in writing by February
8,  2000  regarding  your  appropriate  remedial  actions  to  rectify  the past
financial  statements  which  are  likely  to  be
materially  misstated.


<PAGE>
     Issues  noted  in  the  audit as of February 3, 2000 since the audit is not
completed  as  of  this  date due to lack of audit evidence, this listing is not
complete.


INDICATIONS  THAT  PAST  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  ARE  LIKELY  TO  BE  MATERIALLY
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MISSTATED:
- ----------

     -    There  was a  $5,000,000  payment  to a  related  party  in June  1999
          pursuant to an agreement  related to the  "yellow-page.net"  URL. This
          payment was all recorded as an asset.
     -    There was a  "contingent  asset" of  $3,250,000  recorded  for company
          shares issued as collateral.
     -    There has been no amount  recorded  nor a  calculation  performed  for
          deferred revenue on amounts billed in advance
     -    The  accounting  for the RIGL  acquisition  of Telco  does not  appear
          correct  in that  reverse  acquisition  accounting  applies  and Telco
          should be considered the accounting acquirer
     -    There is an amount ($820,251)  capitalized for proprietary  technology
          that we have been unable to determine the support for
     -    There is an amount ($824,625)  capitalized for prepaid marketing Costs
          that  we  have  been  unable  to  determine  the  support  for nor the
          proprietary of the accounting treatment
     -    We have been  unable  to  determine  the  propriety  of the  Company's
          revenue recognition policy
     -    Goodwill - proper recording as a result of the RIGL/Telco combination,
          amortization period and valuation for impairment
     -    There are significant equity transactions, including options, warrants
          and  stock  for  services,   that  have  not  been  given  appropriate
          accounting recognition.
     -    The  accounting  is not proper and there is not an adequate  allowance
          for doubtful accounts Receivable - ESBI
     -    Use of pooling method of accounting for certain business combinations.

INFORMATION  NEEDED  TO  COMPLETE  AUDIT  PROCEDURES:
- -----------------------------------------------------

     -    The  propriety of the  accounting  for the IGT arid  Olympic  accounts
          receivables  has not  been  determined  nor has  the  adequacy  of the
          allowance for doubtful accounts.
     -    Determination of what constitutes  related party  transactions and the
          related testing of those transactions
     -    Cut-off  information  for the  financial  statements  which need to be
          included in the amended 1OQ and 8K
     -    income tax returns (none have been filed for Telco since inception)
     -    Determination of the completeness of agreements and contracts
     -    Cash receipts for direct bill receivables
     -    Financial statements for subsequent periods


<PAGE>
INFORMATION  NEEDED  TO  COMPLETE  AUDIT  PROCEDURES  (CONTINUED):
- ------------------------------------------------------------------

     -    Going concern  support  including,  but not limited to, the following:
          address  the  ability of the  company to pay off the past due debt and
          debt due within the next 12 months, address the ability of the company
          to perform  under the put options,  cash  projections  for next year's
          operations, etc.
     -    Visit to IGT on 2/11/00 to determine  the  proprietary  of the balance
          and the related controls
     -    Visit to Olympic to determine the  proprietary of the balance arid the
          related controls


<PAGE>


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission