CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT
8-K, 1999-02-26
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS
Previous: MAXFUND TRUST, NSAR-B, 1999-02-26
Next: BOMBARDIER CAPITAL MORTGAGE SECURITIZATION CORP, 8-K, 1999-02-26



<PAGE>
 
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549

                     -------------------------------------


                                   FORM 8-K
                                CURRENT REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


      Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 26, 1999



                            Capital Automotive REIT
                            -----------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
<S>                            <C>                         <C> 
Maryland                              000-23733                 54-1870224
- --------                              ---------                 ----------
(State or other jurisdiction    (Commission file number)        (IRS Employer
 of incorporation)                                          Identification No.)
</TABLE> 


            1420 Spring Hill Road, Suite 525, McLean, Virginia 22102
         -------------------------------------------------------------
         (Address of Principal Executive Offices)           (Zip Code)


       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (703) 288-3075


                                 Not Applicable
                                 --------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>
 
Item. 5.  Other Events.

  Before investing in the securities of Capital Automotive REIT (the "Company"),
investors should be aware that there are various risks.  Investors should
carefully consider, among other factors, the risk factors discussed in this
Current Report on Form 8-K, as well as the risks discussed in any prospectus or
prospectus supplement of the Company.  The Risk Factors contain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.  Also, documents subsequently  filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") will contain forward-looking
statements. When the Company refers to forward-looking information, sometimes
the Company uses words such as "may," "will," "could," "should," "plans,"
"intends," "expects," "believes," "estimates," "anticipates" and "continues."
The risk factors are not all inclusive, particularly with respect to possible
future events.  Many things can happen that can cause actual results to be very
different than those described by the Company.  Any statements made by the
Company that are not historical facts should be considered to be forward-looking
statements. The Company makes no promise to update any of the Company's forward-
looking statements, or to publicly release the results if the Company revises
any of them.

  Unless the context otherwise requires, the term the Company refers to Capital
Automotive REIT and the term the Partnership refers to Capital Automotive L.P.
Capital Automotive Group consists of the Company, the Partnership and their
subsidiaries.  The term "subsidiary" of the Company or the Partnership means a
corporation, partnership, limited liability company or similar entity if the
Company or the Partnership, alone or together, directly or indirectly own at
least a majority of the equity interests of the entity.

                                 RISK  FACTORS

Need for Additional Financing - Capital Automotive Group's ability to grow will
be limited if it cannot obtain additional financing.

  Capital Automotive Group's growth strategy includes continuing to acquire
properties that are used by motor vehicle dealerships and related businesses.
The Company believes that it will be difficult to fund Capital Automotive
Group's expected growth with cash from operating activities because the Company
is required to distribute to its shareholders at least 95% of the Company's
taxable income each year to qualify as a REIT.  These circumstances will require
Capital Automotive Group to rely primarily upon the availability of debt or
equity capital to fund acquisitions.  The debt could include loans from third
parties or the sale of debt securities by the Company.  Equity capital could
include common or preferred shares of the Company or  units of limited
partnership interest of the Partnership.  Capital Automotive Group cannot
guarantee that additional financing, re-financing or capital will be available.
Future equity securities issued by Capital Automotive Group may have terms more
favorable to investors than those of currently outstanding equity securities.
Capital Automotive Group also may be unable to obtain financing on terms
acceptable or advantageous to its long-term interests.  If  Capital Automotive
Group is 

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
unable to meet its long-term capital needs for growth, then it may not
achieve its investment objectives or complete future acquisitions and the amount
of the Company's distributions to shareholders may be reduced.

Risk of Leverage - Capital Automotive Group may incur debt that is significant
in relation to shareholders' equity.

  As of February 3, 1999, Capital Automotive Group had invested approximately
$565 million in properties and had mortgage indebtedness of $162 million due in
2003 and 2008.  That debt is secured by 64 properties.  In the event of a
default under a mortgage, the properties securing that mortgage could be 
foreclosed.  Capital Automotive Group also has, and intends to put in place, 
other debt facilities.  The Company's current policy on use of leverage is to 
operate with a debt to asset ratio of not more than approximately 50%.  The 
Company's Declaration of Trust and Bylaws do not contain any debt incurrence 
limitations and the Board of Trustees could alter or eliminate this policy at 
any time.  Under the current leverage policy, the Company would be permitted 
to and intends to obtain additional financing for Capital Automotive Group's 
long-term capital needs.

  If or when Capital Automotive Group obtains additional debt or the Company
issues debt securities, one result could be increased interest rate risk and
interest expense.  Additional indebtedness may also increase Capital Automotive
Group's exposure to the general risks associated with debt financing.  For
example, outside lenders may impose restrictions on Capital Automotive Group's
ability to obtain additional debt capital or may limit Capital Automotive
Group's ability to engage in certain transactions.    Any breach of these
limitations could result in a default, which could mean that the lender would
require all outstanding indebtedness to be immediately paid in full.  To the
extent any debt is secured by properties, Capital Automotive Group could risk
losing the properties, if there is a default.  Capital Automotive Group may be
unable to repay or refinance this indebtedness.  Capital Automotive Group could
have to dispose of the properties on disadvantageous terms to repay
indebtedness.

Potential Effect of Sales of Shares - If options and warrants for the Company's
common shares and options or redemption rights for the Partnership's units are
exercised, the number of common shares outstanding will increase, which may 
depress the price shareholders would receive if they sold their common shares.

  There are a large number of common shares reserved for issuance upon exercise
of outstanding options and warrants which may increase the number of common
shares that could be sold, including the following as of February 20, 1999:

  .  options to acquire approximately 3,188,000 shares (including options for
     approximately 2,912,000 units), as well as options for approximately 64,000
     additional common shares or units available under the Capital Automotive
     Group 1998 Equity Incentive Plan); of which approximately 707,000 options
     are currently exercisable; and

                                       2
<PAGE>
 
  .  warrants to acquire approximately 3,142,000 common shares, of which
     warrants for approximately 2,692,000 common shares are currently
     exercisable.

  In addition, units issued by the Partnership for the acquisition of properties
are redeemable by the holder generally after at least a one year holding period.
The Partnership is obligated to redeem the units for cash, but the Company may
elect to assume the obligation of the Partnership in which case it may pay cash
or issue common shares.  Units that are redeemed for shares will be exchanged on
a one-for-one basis.  As of February 20, 1999, approximately 6,695,000 units (of
which approximately 4,961,000 are currently redeemable) are outstanding and
redeemable for up to approximately 6,695,000 shares.

Capital Market Risks - Capital Automotive Group may experience difficulty
obtaining funds through the capital markets.

  The Company may attempt to obtain funds through the capital markets by
borrowing with the properties as collateral.  Several factors affect Capital
Automotive Group's ability to complete capital market financings, including: 
(1) conditions in the securities markets generally, including volatility of the
credit markets; (2) conditions in the commercial mortgage and asset-backed
securities markets specifically; (3) the credit quality and rating given to such
securities; (4) compliance with the eligibility requirements established by the
financing documents; and (5) the absence of any material downgrading or
withdrawal of ratings given to such securities. Depending on the outcome of any
ratings and these other factors, the Company could be unable to, or otherwise,
experience delay or difficulty in, implementing this strategy on satisfactory
terms.

Volatility of Share Prices - The market price of the Company's common shares may
vary substantially.

  The trading prices of equity securities issued by REITs have historically been
affected by changes in broader market interest rates.  An increase in market
interest rates may lead prospective purchasers of the Company's common shares to
demand a higher annual yield, which could reduce the market price of the common
shares.  Other factors could affect the market price of the Company's common
shares.  Some factors to consider include: (1) differences between the Company's
actual financial results or operations and those expected by investors and
analysts; (2) changes in analysts' recommendations or projections; (3) changes
in general economic or market conditions; and (4) broad market fluctuations.

                                       3
<PAGE>
 
Uncertainty of Acquisitions - Capital Automotive Group may not be able to
acquire additional properties on terms it believes appropriate, or at all.

  There may not be opportunities for further acquisitions of properties or
opportunities to finance the acquisition of properties on terms that meet
Capital Automotive Group's investment criteria.  Capital Automotive Group may
not be able to take advantage of the opportunities with which it is presented.
This may affect Capital Automotive Group's expected growth.

Dependence on Dealer Group Cash Flows - Capital Automotive Group may suffer if
dealer groups and other lessees generate insufficient cash flows from their
operations to permit them to pay their rent and fulfill their other obligations
under their leases.

  Capital Automotive Group depends on dealer groups, their related persons and
entities, as well as third parties who lease properties from Capital Automotive
Group (the "lessees"), to pay rent and meet their other lease obligations.  If a
lessee fails to pay its rent or to perform any other obligation under the lease,
the lessee could be in default under the lease.  Capital Automotive Group could
wait to see if the lessee resumes paying rent or otherwise starts to comply with
the lease or it may be able to declare the lease in default and seek to enforce
its remedies under the lease.  If the lease has been guaranteed, Capital
Automotive Group could also attempt to collect unpaid rent or other money that
is owed by the lessee from the guarantor.  Capital Automotive Group may never
collect the money that it is owed by the defaulting lessee or by a guarantor.
Capital Automotive Group may seek to evict a defaulting lessee.  Often eviction
is a time consuming legal process.   Assuming Capital Automotive Group was
successful in evicting a lessee or obtaining another legal remedy, it could
incur substantial expenses and legal fees. These and other events could divert
the attention of management from day to day business.  If the lessee is evicted
or otherwise vacates the property, Capital Automotive Group would have to re-
lease the property, which could also be a time consuming and expensive process.
The Company may not be able to re-lease a property on the same or better terms
than the prior lease, or at all. Also, a lessee and/or guarantor can take
actions to attempt to avoid paying rent or other money or to prevent a remedy
(such as eviction).  A lessee and/or guarantor can attempt to seek protection
under the bankruptcy laws, which could result in a delay or reduction in the
payments to Capital Automotive Group or could result in the lease being
terminated at the request of the lessee.

  Capital Automotive Group could face other risks from its relationship with the
lessees.  For example, the lessees could be limited partners of the Partnership,
which could make Capital Automotive Group less inclined to take an action or
influence the timing of such action, if there is a default.  Also, Capital
Automotive Group depends on its lessees to maintain good relationships with
motor vehicle manufacturers and to comply with their franchise agreements. If a
lessee does not comply, the manufacturer could take actions that could affect
the ability of a lessee to pay rent or comply with other lease terms.  Capital
Automotive Group also depends on the lessee to keep the property adequately
insured.  If the lessee does not have enough insurance and there is a loss,
Capital Automotive Group could incur all or some of the cost to repair or

                                       4
<PAGE>
 
replace the property.  This list of ways that Capital Automotive Group is
dependent on the lessees is not all inclusive.  There are other ways in which
actions by the lessee could have an adverse effect on Capital Automotive Group.
The actions discussed above, as well as other events involving the lessee/lessor
relationship, could adversely affect Capital Automotive Group's financial
results and operations.

Dependence on Key Personnel - Capital Automotive Group's operations and business
prospects may suffer if certain officers leave the Company.

  Capital Automotive Group is managed by a small group of senior executives.
The loss of one or more of these officers could have a material adverse effect
on Capital Automotive Group.

Dependence on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers - Capital Automotive Group may be
harmed if manufacturers change production, inventory, marketing or other
practices.

  A lessee's ability to pay rent and perform its other obligations under a lease
will be dependent to a significant extent on its relationship with the motor
vehicle manufacturer. The lessees or their related dealer groups generally
operate dealerships that sell the products of more than one manufacturer.  The
sales mix of makes and models of motor vehicles tends to change periodically;
therefore, sales of the makes or models of one manufacturer today may not
reflect the level of future sales of that manufacturer's products.  A reduction
in inventory, particularly certain models, could lower sales.  Certain other
factors can also affect sales, including the manufacturer's financial condition,
marketing programs and expenditures; vehicle design; production capabilities and
management of the manufacturer; strikes and other labor actions by unions;
negative publicity; product recalls; or litigation. The lessee may be unable to
pay rent or meet other lease obligations, if a dealership's motor vehicle
inventory is reduced or its profitability otherwise declines.

  Manufacturers exercise a substantial degree of control over dealerships, and
the franchise agreements between the dealer groups and the manufacturers provide
for termination or non-renewal for a variety of causes.  Capital Automotive
Group has no rights under the franchise agreements.  If a manufacturer
terminates or declines to renew one or more franchise agreements or negotiates
terms for renewal that are better for the manufacturer, the lessee may be unable
to pay rent to the Company and perform its other obligations under the lease.

  Certain franchise agreements also contain restrictions on the sale or transfer
of assets or real property necessary for operation of the dealerships, or may
grant manufacturers the right to purchase those assets or real property under
certain circumstances, sometimes at below market terms.  Failure to receive all
or some of the required consents or waivers could interfere with Capital
Automotive Group's ability to acquire or sell properties.

                                       5
<PAGE>
 
Volatility of Motor Vehicle Dealership Business - Capital Automotive Group may
be harmed if automotive sales and servicing profitability decline.

  Capital Automotive Group's strategy is to acquire properties used in the
operation of motor vehicle dealerships and related businesses.  As a result,
Capital Automotive Group may be exposed to risks common to that industry.  A
motor vehicle dealership's success depends on general economic and other
factors.  Various factors, many of which are beyond the control of the dealer
group that operates the dealership, may adversely affect motor vehicle sales 
and servicing profitability.  These factors include circumstances that affect 
consumer spending, such as rates of employment, income growth or interest 
rates; as well as other national and local conditions, automotive innovations 
and general consumer sentiment.  An economic downturn within the motor vehicle 
industry will have a more significant effect on cash available for distribution
to shareholders than if the Company had diversified its investments into 
properties used by other types of businesses.

Conflicts of Interest - Certain members of the Company's Board of Trustees have
interests that could conflict with the interests of other shareholders.

  Certain conflicts of interest exist between the Company and Mr. Pohanka, Mr.
Rosenthal, or Mr. Sheehy, each of whom is a Trustee of the Company and
affiliated with certain lessees and entities which have sold property to Capital
Automotive Group.  Messrs. Pohanka, Rosenthal, and Sheehy may have the ability
to influence Capital Automotive Group's business and operations in connection
with (1) the terms of the leases for future properties which may be acquired
from any one of them, (2) the exercise or waiver of the Company's rights under a
lease with one of them, including the right of first offer and repurchase right,
(3) the decision to sell or refinance a property, (4) the terms of any "lock-
out" restrictions, which limit the Company's ability to sell or refinance
particular properties, and (5) the enforcement or waiver of the terms of any
leases or other agreements with Messrs. Pohanka, Rosenthal or Sheehy or related
persons or entities.

Competition in the Motor Vehicle Industry - Capital Automotive Group may suffer
if the dealer groups that lease the properties owned by Capital Automotive Group
are unable to compete effectively in the very competitive motor vehicle
industry.

  The operation of dealerships and related businesses is a highly competitive
undertaking.  The United States motor vehicle industry generally is considered a
mature industry. Minimal growth generally is projected in unit sales of new
vehicles. The motor vehicle industry has been cyclical, historically
experiencing periodic downturns. Many factors affect the industry, including
general economic conditions and consumer confidence, the level of discretionary
personal income, interest rates and credit availability. Some of the dealer
groups that lease properties owned by Capital Automotive Group compete with
dealerships that are larger and have greater financial and marketing resources.
Competition may become stiffer if, as expected, certain vehicle manufacturers
directly enter the retail market. In addition, the industry is undergoing
consolidation. Dealer groups which sell motor vehicles of a single or a limited



                                       6
<PAGE>
 
number of brands are increasingly being acquired by dealer groups that represent
many manufacturers and brands, resulting in larger and more efficient
competitors. The same is true for the manufacturers themselves, which may result
in a reduction or consolidation of brands that a dealer group can market.

Reliance Upon Discretion of Management - Shareholders must rely upon management
to identify and evaluate properties and make operational decisions.

  Shareholders will not have an opportunity to approve or evaluate any
properties acquired by Capital Automotive Group, or acquisition and lease terms.
Shareholders must depend upon the ability and judgment of the management of 
the Company with respect to the identification and selection of properties and 
the negotiation of acquisition and lease terms.

Real Estate Investment Risks - The Company's ability to make distributions to
its shareholders and Capital Automotive Group's operations and financial status
could be adversely affected by a number of factors affecting the value of real
estate.

  The Company's ability to make distributions to its shareholders depends upon
Capital Automotive Group's ability to generate revenues in excess of expenses,
including debt service. Capital Automotive Group's investments are and will
continue to be subject to the risks generally incident to the ownership of real
property, including: (1) adverse changes in national or local economic
conditions; (2) changes in the investment climate for real estate; (3) changes
in real estate tax rates and other operating expenses; (4) adverse changes in
governmental rules and fiscal policies, including zoning and land use; (5) acts
of God which may result in uninsured losses; and (6) other factors which are
beyond Capital Automotive Group's control.  The material factors are discussed
below:

  Common real estate risks could reduce Capital Automotive Group's revenues or
increase its expenses.  The properties may generate total revenues lower than
those anticipated.  This would reduce the amount of funds available for
distribution by the Company to its shareholders.  If a property is not returned
to Capital Automotive Group in good condition, the security deposit may be
insufficient to restore a property and Capital Automotive Group may be required
to expend its own funds.  These repair and restoration costs could be
significant.

  Real estate tax levels could increase.  Certain local real property tax
assessors may seek to reassess the properties as a result of Capital Automotive
Group acquiring such properties.  Those properties may be subject to higher real
estate tax rates.  While the leases pass such increases on to the lessees, a
lessee may be unable to pay the increased amount, or the increased costs could
make the property less valuable in the future.

  Operating expenses could increase.  The properties will be exposed to risks
common to operating a commercial real estate property, any or all of which may
affect Capital Automotive 

                                       7
<PAGE>
 
Group. For example, the properties will be subject to increases in tax rates,
utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance, and
administrative expenses. If Capital Automotive Group is unable to lease
properties on a basis that obligates the lessees to pay such amounts, or if a
lessee fails to or is unable to pay required amounts, then Capital Automotive
Group could be required to pay those costs. To the extent Capital Automotive
Group covers these costs, the funds available for distributions or for future
acquisitions could be reduced.

  Capital Automotive Group could have difficulty selling real estate it no
longer wants to hold. The illiquidity of real estate investments may delay
Capital Automotive Group's reaction to changes in economic or other conditions.

Control Over Properties - Capital Automotive Group does not exercise complete
control over the management or maintenance of the properties it leases to dealer
groups.

  The lessees of the properties control the management and maintenance of the
properties under the leases.  The leases generally require that the lessees
operate the properties in an efficient and professional manner and maintain the
properties in good order, repair and appearance.  During the terms of the
leases, Capital Automotive Group does not have the authority to require any
lessees to operate the properties in a particular manner or to govern any
particular aspect of their operation, except as set forth broadly in the leases.

Governmental Regulation - Environmental and other governmental laws and
regulations could reduce the value or profitability of Capital Automotive
Group's properties.

  The lessees and Capital Automotive Group are subject to a wide range of
federal, state and local laws and regulations, such as local licensing
requirements, consumer protection laws and regulations relating to gasoline
storage, waste treatment and other environmental matters, including:

  Environmental Laws.  All real property and the operations conducted on real
property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating
to hazardous materials, environmental protection and human health and safety.
Certain of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on
certain statutory classes of persons including lessees, owners or operators, for
the costs of investigation or remediation of contaminated properties, regardless
of fault or the legality of the original disposal.

  These laws and regulations apply to such past and present business operations
of the dealer groups as the use, storage, handling and contracting for recycling
or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes.  Capital Automotive
Group's lessees, like many of their competitors, have incurred, and will
continue to incur, capital and operating expenditures and other costs associated
with complying with such laws and regulations.

                                       8
<PAGE>
 
  Capital Automotive Group cannot predict what other environmental legislation
or regulations will be enacted in the future, how existing or future laws or
regulations will be administered or interpreted or what environmental conditions
may be found to exist on the properties in the future.  Compliance with new or
more stringent laws or regulations, stricter interpretation of existing laws or
the future discovery of environmental contamination may require Capital
Automotive Group or the lessees to spend funds to remedy environmental problems.
As a current or previous owner, the Company, the Partnership and/or a subsidiary
may be held liable under certain laws for the costs of removal or remediation of
certain hazardous or toxic substances found at a property.  These costs could be
substantial.

  Generally, the lessees must comply with environmental laws and most
remediation requirements.  Capital Automotive Group's leases typically impose
obligations on the lessees to indemnify Capital Automotive Group from any
compliance costs it may experience as a result of the environmental conditions
on the property.  However, if a lease does not require compliance, or if a
lessee fails to or cannot comply, Capital Automotive Group could be forced to
pay such costs.  If not addressed, environmental conditions could impair Capital
Automotive Group's ability to sell or re-lease the affected properties in the
future or result in lower sales prices or rent payments.

  Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990.  The properties, as commercial
facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990.  Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance
with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 may change in the future.  Future
compliance with the Act may require expensive changes to the properties.
Although the lessee will typically have primary responsibility for complying
with the Act, Capital Automotive Group may have to pay the costs if a lessee
does not or cannot comply.

  Other Regulations.  State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements
regulate the use of the properties.  The leases typically require that each
lessee comply with all regulations. Failure to comply could result in fines by
governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or
restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.  Non-
compliance of this sort could affect Capital Automotive Group's revenues from a
lessee and Capital Automotive Group's ability to re-sell or re-lease a property.

Competition for Properties -- If other companies seek to acquire properties used
by motor vehicle dealerships or related businesses, Capital Automotive Group's
acquisition costs may go up and the number of available acquisition
opportunities and lease rates may go down.

  Other public or private entities may also target properties used by motor
vehicle dealerships and related business for acquisition. Some of these
companies may have greater financial resources or general real estate experience
than Capital Automotive Group.  The Company believes that competition for
properties will primarily be on the basis of established relationships in the 
market place, acquisition price and 

                                       9
<PAGE>
 
rental and other lease terms. Competition could increase acquisition prices and
decrease rents. This in turn would adversely impact Capital Automotive Group's
financial results and reduce the funds available for distribution to the
Company's shareholders.

REIT Qualification - The Company's distributions to shareholders may go down if
the Company fails to continue to qualify as a REIT.

  The Company currently operates and has operated since 1998 in a manner that is
intended to allow the Company to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code ").

  Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and
complex Code provisions.  The complexity of these provisions and of the
applicable income tax regulations that have been issued under the Code (the
"Treasury Regulations ") is greater in the case of a REIT that holds its assets
in partnership form. Certain facts and circumstances not entirely within the
Company's control may affect the Company's ability to qualify as a REIT.  For
example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of the Company's gross
income in any year must be derived from qualifying rents.  Satisfying this
requirement could be difficult, for example, if defaults by lessees were to
reduce the amount of income from qualifying rents.  Also, the Company must make
distributions to shareholders aggregating annually at least 95% of its net
taxable income (excluding capital gains).  In addition, new legislation, new
regulations, new administrative interpretations or new court decisions may
significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the
federal income tax consequences of such qualification.

  If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT:

  .  it would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to shareholders in
     computing taxable income;

  .  it would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates;

  .  it could be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax;

  .  unless it is entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, it
     could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four taxable years following the
     year during which the Company was disqualified; and

  .  the funds available for distribution to shareholders would be reduced
     substantially for each of the years involved.

  Meeting Minimum Distribution Requirements.  Generally, a REIT must distribute
95% of its REIT taxable income annually to shareholders.  The Company will be
subject to income tax on amounts of undistributed REIT taxable income and net
capital gain.  In addition, the Company 

                                       10
<PAGE>
 
would be subject to a 4% excise tax if it fails to distribute sufficient income
to meet a minimum distribution test based on the Company's ordinary income,
capital gain and aggregate undistributed income from prior years.

  The Company intends to make distributions to shareholders to comply with the
Code's distribution provisions and to avoid federal income and excise tax.
Because the Company's income is derived primarily from its share of income from
the Partnership, the Company's cash flow will consist primarily of distributions
from the Partnership.  The Company may need to borrow funds to meet its
distribution requirements because:

  .  the Company's or the Partnership's and its subsidiaries' income may not be
     matched by their related expenses at the time the income is received for
     purposes of determining taxable income; and

  .  non-deductible capital expenditures, creation of reserves, or required debt
     amortization payments may reduce available cash but not taxable income.

In these circumstances, the Company might have to borrow funds even if its
management believes the market conditions make borrowing financially
unattractive or that such funds would not be borrowed absent tax considerations.

  Failing to Qualify as a Partnership.   The Company believes that the
Partnership is treated as a partnership, and not as a corporation, for federal
income tax purposes.  If the IRS were to challenge successfully the status of
the Partnership as a partnership for federal income tax purposes:

  .  the Partnership would be taxed as a corporation;

  .  the Company would cease to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
     purposes; and

  .  the amount of cash available for distribution to the Company's shareholders
     would be substantially reduced.

  Tax Treatment of Leases.  The Company believes that the leases of properties
owned by Capital Automotive Group will be treated as leases for federal income
tax purposes.  If the IRS were to challenge successfully the characterization of
these leases, the Partnership or its subsidiary would not be treated as the
owner of the property for federal income tax purposes.  As a result, the
Partnership or its subsidiary would lose tax depreciation and cost recovery
deductions with respect to such properties, which in turn could cause the
Company to fail to qualify as a REIT.  Although the Company will use its best
efforts to structure any leasing transaction for properties acquired in the
future such that the lease will be characterized as a lease and the Partnership
or its subsidiary will be treated as the owner of the property for federal
income tax purposes, the Company will not seek an advance ruling from the IRS
and may not 

                                       11
<PAGE>
 
seek an opinion of counsel that it will be treated as the owner of any leased
properties for federal income tax purposes. Thus, there can be no assurance that
future leases will be treated as leases for federal income tax purposes.

  Other Tax Liabilities.  Even if the Company qualifies as and maintains its
status as a REIT, it may be subject to certain federal income taxes if it has a
certain amount of non-qualified income. For example, if the Company has net
income from a "prohibited transaction," such income will be subject to a 100%
tax.  In addition, the Company may be subject to state and local taxes on its
income and property.

REIT Ownership Limit - To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company limits the
amount of shares any one shareholder can own.

  The Code imposes certain limitations on the ownership of the stock of a REIT.
For example, not more than 50% in value of the Company's outstanding shares of
capital stock may be owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code).  To protect the Company's REIT status, the
Declaration of Trust prohibits any one shareholder from owning (actually or
constructively) more than (1) 9.9% of the outstanding common shares or (2) 9.9%
of any class or series of outstanding preferred shares.  The constructive
ownership rules are complex.  Shares of the Company's capital stock owned,
actually or constructively, by a group of related individuals and/or entities
may be treated as constructively owned by one of those individuals or entities.
As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.9% of the outstanding common shares
and/or  preferred shares (or the acquisition of an interest in an entity that
owns common or preferred shares), by an individual or entity could cause that
individual or entity (or another) to own constructively more than 9.9% of the
outstanding stock.  If that happened, the transfer or ownership would be void or
such shares would be transferred to a charitable trust and then sold to someone
who can own such shares without violating the 9.9% ownership limits.

  The Board of Trustees and two-thirds of shareholders eligible to vote at a
shareholder meeting may remove these restrictions if they determine it is no
longer in the Company's best interests to attempt to qualify, or to continue to
qualify, as a REIT.  The 9.9% ownership restrictions may delay, defer or prevent
a transaction or a change in the Company's control that might involve a premium
price for the common shares or otherwise be in the shareholders' best interest.

Takeover Limitations - Certain tax and anti-takeover provisions of the Company's
Declaration of Trust and Bylaws may inhibit a change in control of the Company.

  Certain provisions contained in the Declaration of Trust and the Bylaws of the
Company and the Maryland General Corporation Law, as applicable to Maryland
REITs, may discourage a third party from making a tender offer or acquisition
proposal to the Company.  If this were to happen, then it would possibly delay,
deter or prevent a change in the Company's control or 

                                       12
<PAGE>
 
the removal of existing management. This may delay or prevent the shareholders
from receiving a premium for their common shares over then-prevailing market
prices. These provisions include:

  .  the REIT ownership limits described above;

  .  authorization of the issuance of the Company's preferred shares with
     powers, preferences or rights to be determined by the Board of Trustees;

  .  the requirement that a two-thirds vote of the holders of common shares is
     needed to remove a member of the Board of Trustees; and

  .  the terms of the Maryland General Corporation Law regarding business
     combinations and control share acquisitions.

Changes in Policies - The Company has the right to change some of Capital
Automotive Group policies that may be important to the shareholders without
shareholder consent.

  The major policies of Capital Automotive Group, including its policies with
respect to investments, leverage or financing, growth and debt capitalization,
as well as the Company's REIT qualification and distributions, are determined by
the Board of Trustees or those committees or officers to whom the Board of
Trustees has delegated that authority.  The Board of Trustees may amend or
revise these and other policies from time to time without shareholder vote.
Accordingly, the shareholders may not have control over changes in Capital
Automotive Group's policies.

Year 2000 Compliance - Capital Automotive Group may experience operational
difficulties if its systems are not fully compliant with Y2K standards.

  Capital Automotive Group has completed an assessment of both its information
technology and embedded technology and software applications that could
materially affect its business. Based on this review, the Company believes that
Capital Automotive Group's systems are "Year 2000"  compliant.  Coding errors or
other defects may be discovered, however, in the future. Capital Automotive
Group is dependent on third parties, such as lessees, who pay rent to Capital
Automotive Group and provide it with information.  The Company is still
assessing compliance by these third parties and does not know whether systems of
other companies it depends on, including its lessees, will be year 2000
compliant.  Capital Automotive Group's revenues, business and operations could
be negatively affected if these companies' systems are not year 2000 compliant.
For example, Capital Automotive Group may experience delays in collecting rent
payments.  The Company has not yet developed a contingency plan to deal with
third party non-compliance.

                                       13
<PAGE>
 
                                  SIGNATURES

  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


 

  CAPITAL AUTOMOTIVE REIT



  By:     /s/ Thomas D. Eckert
         -------------------------------------
  Name:  Thomas D. Eckert
         -------------------------------------
  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
         -------------------------------------



Date:    February 26, 1999

                                       14


© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission