HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC, S-1/A, 1998-04-09

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC
S-1/A, 1998-04-09
MEDICAL, DENTAL & HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES

Previous: SERVICEMASTER CO, S-3, 1998-04-09

Next: GLICKENHAUS VALUE PORTFOLIOS 1998 EQUITY COLLECTION SERIES I, 497, 1998-04-09

<PAGE> 1

AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON APRIL 9, 1998.

REGISTRATION NO. 333-46349
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------------

AMENDMENT NO. 3

FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
---------------------

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

---------------------

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
GEORGIA 5047 58-1882343
(State or other jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) Identification No.)
</TABLE>

ONE HORIZON WAY
P.O. DRAWER 627
MANCHESTER, GEORGIA 31816
(706) 846-3126
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

MARSHALL B. HUNT
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ONE HORIZON WAY
P.O. DRAWER 627
MANCHESTER, GEORGIA 31816
(706) 846-3126
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of agent for service)

---------------------

COPIES TO:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
JEFFREY M. STEIN LEONARD A. SILVERSTEIN
KING & SPALDING LONG ALDRIDGE & NORMAN LLP
191 PEACHTREE STREET 303 PEACHTREE STREET, SUITE 5300
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1763 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30308
PHONE: (404) 572-4600 PHONE: (404)527-4000
FASCIMILE: (404) 572-5100 FACSIMILE: (404) 527-4198
</TABLE>

---------------------

APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As
promptly as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, check the following box. [ ]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [ ]

---------------------

THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR
DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL
FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION
STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(C) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID
SECTION 8(C), MAY DETERMINE.

================================================================================
<PAGE> 2

INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A
REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR
MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR
THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE
SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE
UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS
OF ANY SUCH STATE.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED APRIL 9, 1998

3,473,000 Shares

(HORIZON MEDICAL LOGO)
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Common Stock
($.001 par value)

---------------------
Of the shares of Common Stock ("Common Stock") offered hereby (the "Offering"),
2,600,000 shares are being sold by Horizon Medical Products, Inc. ("HMP") and
873,000 shares are being sold by the Selling Shareholders named herein under
"Principal and Selling Shareholders" (the "Selling Shareholders"). The Company
will not receive any of the proceeds of shares sold by the Selling Shareholders.
Prior to the Offering, there has been no public market for the Common Stock. It
is anticipated that the initial public offering price will be between $13.00 and
$15.00 per share. For information relating to the factors to be considered in
determining the initial offering price to the public, see "Underwriting."

Application has been made to list the Common Stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market's
National Market under the symbol "HMPS."

FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN CONNECTION WITH
AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK, SEE "RISK FACTORS" ON PAGE 7 HEREIN.

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS.
ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO
PRICE DISCOUNTS AND PROCEEDS TO SELLING
TO PUBLIC COMMISSIONS COMPANY(1) SHAREHOLDERS
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Per Share............................ $ $ $ $
Total(2)............................. $ $ $ $
</TABLE>

(1) Before deduction of expenses payable by the Company, estimated at
$1,250,000.
(2) The Company has granted the Underwriters an option, exercisable for 30 days
from the date of this Prospectus, to purchase a maximum of 520,950
additional shares of Common Stock to cover over-allotments of shares. If the
option is exercised in full, the total Price to Public will be $ ,
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions will be $ , and Proceeds to
Company will be $ .

The shares of Common Stock are offered by the several Underwriters when, as
and if delivered to and accepted by the Underwriters and subject to their right
to reject orders in whole or in part. It is expected that the shares of Common
Stock will be ready for delivery on or about , 1998, against
payment in immediately available funds.

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON
BANCAMERICA ROBERTSON STEPHENS
NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY SECURITIES LLC

Prospectus dated , 1998.

<PAGE> 3

[PHOTOGRAPHS OF PRODUCTS INDICATING BENEFITS AND USES]

------------------

CERTAIN PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN THIS OFFERING MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS
THAT STABILIZE, MAINTAIN, OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK
OFFERED HEREBY, INCLUDING OVER-ALLOTMENT, STABILIZING TRANSACTIONS, SYNDICATE
SHORT COVERING TRANSACTIONS AND PENALTY BIDS. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THESE
ACTIVITIES, SEE "UNDERWRITING."

------------------

CIRCLE C(R), HMP (AND DESIGN), INFUSE-A-PORT(R), LIFEPORT (STYLIZED),
NEOSTAR MEDICAL(R) AND TRIUMPH-1(R) ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF THE COMPANY.
BAYONET(TM), HMP(TM), HORIZON(TM), HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS(TM),
INFUSE-A-CATH(TM), LIFEPORT(TM) AND PHERES-FLOW(TM) ARE TRADEMARKS OF THE
COMPANY. ALL OTHER TRADE NAMES, TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REFERRED TO IN THIS
PROSPECTUS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.
2
<PAGE> 4

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

The following information is qualified in its entirety by, and should be
read in conjunction with, the more detailed information, including "Risk
Factors" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, appearing
elsewhere in this Prospectus. Unless otherwise indicated, all information in
this Prospectus (i) assumes no exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment
option and (ii) reflects the conversion of all shares of the Company's Class B
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share, and Class A Common Stock, $.001 par
value per share, into shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value per share,
concurrently with a stock split of approximately 92.42-for-one immediately prior
to consummation of the Offering. See "Underwriting" and "Description of Capital
Stock."

THE COMPANY

HMP(TM) is a rapidly growing specialty medical device company focused on
manufacturing and marketing vascular access products. Vascular access products
comprised over an estimated $1.3 billion market worldwide in 1997. The Company's
vascular access product lines include implantable ports, which are used
primarily in cancer treatment protocols, and specialty catheters, which are used
in hemodialysis and stem cell apheresis procedures. The Company believes it
offers the broadest available product lines in each of these product categories
and that it has the largest direct sales force focused exclusively on vascular
access products.

The Company's vascular access ports are used primarily in systemic or
regional short- and long-term cancer treatment protocols that require frequent
infusions of highly concentrated or toxic medications (such as chemotherapy
agents, antibiotics or analgesics) and frequent blood samplings. The Company
believes that the worldwide market for vascular access ports will continue to
grow primarily due to the increased utilization of chemotherapy protocols,
driven by (i) aging population demographics and the higher incidence of cancer
among persons 60 years of age and older relative to other age groups and (ii)
the increasing patient population for whom chemotherapy has become an
appropriate treatment protocol due to earlier detection and intervention and the
increased efficacy of chemotherapy treatments.

The Company expects that its specialty hemodialysis and apheresis families
of catheters will continue to benefit from the unique Circle C(R) and
Pheres-Flow(TM)designs and the growth of underlying markets. Growth in the
number of hemodialysis patients is expected to result primarily from (i) the
aging of the general population, (ii) the increased effectiveness of treatments
for and higher survival rates of patients suffering from hypertension, diabetes
and other illnesses which lead to renal failure and (iii) increasingly efficient
hemodialysis procedures which have enabled older patients and others that
previously could not tolerate hemodialysis to benefit from this treatment. The
Company believes that stem cell apheresis procedures will continue to experience
significant growth primarily from increasing awareness and acceptance of
apheresis as part of the treatment protocol for various cancers and improvements
in apheresis procedures.

The Company believes that the strength of its marketing, manufacturing, and
management infrastructure, together with the experience of its management team
in developing strategic partnerships and acquiring and integrating product
lines, positions it to become a leading supplier in the vascular access product
market. The Company will seek to achieve this objective and capitalize on
favorable industry dynamics by pursuing the following strategies.

- Focus on the Vascular Access Market. The Company has developed a
highly-specialized sales force that focuses exclusively on vascular access
products and believes it offers its customers the broadest available lines
in each of the Company's three major categories of products. By offering
broad product lines, including proprietary products, the Company is able
to take advantage of cross-selling opportunities within its targeted
customer base. The Company believes that its customers benefit from its
broad knowledge of vascular access products and procedures, comprehensive
customer support and responsiveness to their changing needs.

- Exploit Unique Products. The Company manufactures and markets certain
lines of products that utilize unique technologies which the Company
believes offer superior performance compared with competing products. Such
products include the Circle C(R) dual lumen hemodialysis catheters and the

3
<PAGE> 5

Pheres-Flow(TM)stem cell apheresis catheter. The Company will seek to
increase its sales of these unique products and utilize cross-selling to
increase sales of its other product lines.

- Pursue Strategic Acquisitions/Partnerships. The Company has enhanced its
product lines through completion of the acquisition of NeoStar Medical(R)
Technologies, Inc. ("NeoStar Medical(R)") in October 1995 (the "NeoStar
Medical(R) Acquisition"), which gave the Company its first line of
catheters, and the acquisition of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc.
("Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)") in July 1997 (the "Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)
Acquisition"), which significantly expanded the Company's line of vascular
access ports. The Company believes that the vascular access products
industry remains highly fragmented, and that there will continue to be
attractive strategic partnering and acquisition opportunities in the
industry. The Company will seek to acquire products that: (i) will broaden
its lines of vascular access products or increase its penetration of
existing markets; (ii) can be effectively marketed by its sales
organization; and (iii) can be manufactured at the Company's recently
expanded manufacturing facility.

- Increase Efficiency of Manufacturing Operations. The Company believes
that it can achieve significant cost efficiencies through transitioning
the manufacturing of all its product lines to its recently expanded
manufacturing facility. The Company will also seek to leverage its
manufacturing infrastructure by adding newly acquired or developed
vascular access products to its product lines.

- Develop and Expand Distribution Capabilities. The Company plans to
continue to build upon the success of its sales organization by expanding
its marketing efforts internationally, by entering into group purchasing
contracts and by enhancing its direct sales force. In 1997, approximately
17% of the Company's revenues were generated from sales to end-users
outside the United States, and management believes there are significant
opportunities to increase its export sales. The Company will also seek to
enter into additional group purchasing contracts with national purchasing
groups, which are playing an increasingly significant role in the
decisions of hospitals and other health care organizations to purchase
certain medical devices. In connection with such efforts, the Company has
recently entered into group purchasing agreements with Premier Purchasing
Partners, L.P. ("Premier"), a purchasing group that includes over 1,700
owned, leased, managed and affiliated hospitals, pursuant to which the
Company will be an approved vendor for such hospitals (the "Premier
Purchasing Agreement") and AmeriNet, Inc. ("AmeriNet"), one of the
nation's largest group purchasing organizations. In addition, the Company
has commenced an arrangement with Allegiance Healthcare Corporation
("Allegiance") pursuant to which the Company's products will be included
in the Allegiance purchasing agreement with University HealthSystem
Consortium ("UHC"), a group of the nation's largest academic medical
centers.
------------------

HMP(TM) was incorporated in Georgia in 1990. The Company's principal
executive offices are located at One Horizon Way, P.O. Drawer 627, Manchester,
Georgia 31816. The Company's telephone and facsimile numbers are (706) 846-3126
and (706) 846-3146, respectively.

4
<PAGE> 6

THE OFFERING

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Common Stock offered by:
The Company.......................... 2,600,000 shares
The Selling Shareholders............. 873,000 shares
----------
Total...................... 3,473,000 shares
==========
Common Stock to be outstanding after
the Offering(1).................... 12,800,000 shares
Use of Proceeds...................... Repayment of outstanding indebtedness and for working capital
and general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of
complementary businesses, products or technologies and certain
additional office space. The Company will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of Common Stock by the Selling
Shareholders. See "Use of Proceeds."
Proposed Nasdaq National Market
Symbol............................. HMPS
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) Does not include (i) 40,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options granted to non-employee directors ("Outside
Directors") of the Company (the "Outside Directors' Options") under the
Company's 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Stock Incentive Plan"), (ii)
99,600 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options
granted upon conversion of stock appreciation rights ("SARs") to holders of
SARs who are employed by the Company upon consummation of the Offering (the
"SAR Conversion Options"), (iii) 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon
the exercise of stock options granted to an executive officer of the Company
(the "Executive's Options"), (iv) 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable
upon the exercise of stock options granted to an advisor of the Company (the
"Advisor's Options"), (v) 350,400 shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan, (vi) 500,000 shares of Common Stock
reserved for issuance upon the exercise of a warrant to purchase Common
Stock granted by the Company to Premier in connection with the Premier
Purchasing Agreement (the "Premier Warrant") and (vii) 45,328 shares of
Common Stock issuable to an affiliate of the Company after the Offering and
certain additional shares of Common Stock which may become issuable to such
affiliate and another affiliate of the Company as consulting fees. See
"Management -- Stock Incentive Plan" and "-- 1995 Stock Appreciation Rights
Plan," "Description of Capital Stock -- Premier Warrant," "Certain
Transactions -- Consulting Agreements with Directors" and "-- Consulting
Agreement with Healthcare Alliance."

5
<PAGE> 7

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- -----------------------------
PRO FORMA
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(1)(2)
--------- -----------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales....................................... $ 5,003 $ 7,052 $ 15,798 $ 22,818
Cost of goods sold.............................. 2,227 2,997 6,273 8,660
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Gross profit.................................... 2,776 4,055 9,525 14,158
Selling, general and administrative expenses.... 2,921 4,560 6,476 8,111
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Operating income (loss)......................... (145) (505) 3,049 6,047
Interest (expense) income....................... (242) (733) (3,971) 55
Accretion of value of put warrant repurchase
obligation(3)................................. -- -- (8,000) --
Other income.................................... -- 54 70 70
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary item............................ (387) (1,184) (8,852) 6,172
Income tax benefit (expense).................... 7 -- (320) (2,379)
Effect of conversion to C Corporation status.... (7) -- -- --
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of
debt.......................................... (70) -- -- --
--------- --------- --------- ----------
Net income (loss)............................... $ (457) $ (1,184) $ (9,172) $ 3,793
========= ========= ========= ==========
Loss per share before extraordinary item --basic
and diluted................................... $ (.04) $ -- $ -- $ --
Net income (loss) per share -- basic and
diluted....................................... $ (.05) $ (.13) $ (.97) $ 0.30
Weighted average common shares outstanding...... 9,144 9,419 9,419 12,800
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1997
--------------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(2)
-------- --------------
<S> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $ 2,894 $ 6,841
Working capital............................................. 6,842 12,886
Total assets................................................ 31,577 35,262
Long-term debt, net of current maturities................... 23,971 43
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)........................ (11,150) 31,023
</TABLE>

- ---------------

The unaudited pro forma as adjusted consolidated financial information presented
does not purport to represent what the consolidated results of operations or
financial condition of the Company would have been if the transactions reflected
therein had occurred on the assumed dates or to project the future consolidated
results of operations or financial condition of the Company. See the Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this
Prospectus.

(1) Gives effect to the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition as if it had been
completed on January 1, 1997. The pro forma adjustments include (i) a
reduction of cost of goods sold for eliminated overhead allocation, (ii)
adjustment of selling, general and administrative expenses to increase for
amortization of intangible assets and to decrease for elimination of
salaries, (iii) an increase in interest expense due to financial costs of
the acquisition, (iv) removal of accretion of value of the put warrant
repurchase obligation and (v) related tax effects.

(2) Adjusted to reflect net proceeds of $32,600 from the sale of 2,600 shares of
Common Stock offered by the Company hereby (after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated Offering expenses payable by the
Company) and the application of the net proceeds to the Company from the
Offering as set forth herein. See "Use of Proceeds." The adjustments include
a reduction of interest expense, an increase in compensation costs following
the Offering and related tax effects.

(3) See Notes 6 and 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
for a discussion of this non-recurring item.

6
<PAGE> 8

RISK FACTORS

An investment in the Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. In
addition to the other information in this Prospectus, the following risk factors
should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business before
purchasing shares of the Common Stock offered hereby.

HISTORY OF LOSSES

Since its inception in 1990, the Company has incurred substantial costs to
develop, acquire and enhance its product lines, establish marketing and
distribution relationships, recruit and train its sales force, establish its
manufacturing capabilities and build a management infrastructure. As a result,
from its inception through December 31, 1997, the Company sustained cumulative
net losses of $12.0 million, which includes $9.8 million in interest expense and
related charges incurred in 1997 in connection with the warrant issued to
NationsCredit Commercial Corporation ("NationsCredit") in July 1997 (the
"NationsCredit Warrant"). The Company incurred net losses of $457,113, $1.2
million and $9.2 million during fiscal 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively ($3.8
million income on a pro forma as adjusted basis giving effect to the
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)Acquisition as if it had been completed in January 1, 1997
and as adjusted to reflect the sale of 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock offered
by the Company hereby and the application of the net proceeds therefrom as set
forth herein). No assurance can be given that the Company will not continue to
incur losses in future periods. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital
Resources."

LIMITED MANUFACTURING EXPERIENCE

The Company's success will depend in part on its ability to manufacture its
products in compliance with international and domestic standards such as ISO
9001, the United States Food and Drug Administration's (the "FDA") Good
Manufacturing Practices ("GMP") regulations and other applicable licensing and
regulatory requirements in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis, while
maintaining product quality and acceptable manufacturing costs. The Company has
historically outsourced the manufacturing of most of its product lines to third
parties while remaining responsible for that work. In the fourth quarter of
1996, the Company transitioned the manufacturing of its Circle C(R) and
Pheres-Flow(TM) specialty catheter product lines into its manufacturing facility
in Manchester, Georgia. The Company is currently transitioning the manufacturing
of its LifePort(TM), Infuse-a-Port(R) and Infuse-a-Cath(TM) product lines to the
Manchester facility from a facility in Norwood, Massachusetts. The Company has
the right to use the Norwood facility until April 1998, and there is currently
no assurance that the Company will be able to continue using this facility after
April 1998, even if the Company has not completed its transition to the
Manchester facility. If such an event were to occur, the Company could be unable
to meet its customers' product needs, resulting in lost business. Before the
Company's right to use the Norwood facility expires, the Company expects to move
its inventory and remaining manufacturing equipment to the Manchester facility.
The Company is currently building inventory in anticipation of this transition,
however, there can be no assurance that the inventory level built up by the
Company will be sufficient to meet customer demands during this period. The
Norwood facility is certified under ISO 9001 and has received the Community
European Mark (the "CE Mark"), thus allowing the products produced at this
facility to be sold in the European Community. The Company is seeking
certification as an ISO 9001 medical device manufacturing facility for the
Manchester facility and a CE Mark for the products currently manufactured at the
Manchester facility and the products in the LifePort(TM), Infuse-a-Port(R) and
Infuse-a-Cath(TM) product lines. Although the Company expects to receive ISO
9001 certification and the CE Mark by June 1998, there can be no assurance that
such certification and the CE Mark will be received by such time, if at all. If
the Company does not receive these certifications for its Manchester facility,
it will ultimately be unable to sell its products in Europe. See
"Business -- Backlog." The Company has undergone and expects to continue to
undergo regular GMP inspections in connection with the manufacture of its
products at the Company's facilities. The Company's success will depend, among
other things, on its ability to efficiently manufacture different products and
to integrate newly acquired products with existing products. There can be no
assurance that the Company will not encounter difficulties in transitioning the
manufacturing of the LifePort(TM), Infuse-a-Port(R) and Infuse-a-Cath(TM)
product lines to the Manchester facility and in
7
<PAGE> 9

increasing production of new products, including problems involving production
yields, quality control and assurance and component supply. The Company's
failure to successfully commence the manufacturing of new products, to maintain
or increase production volumes of new or existing products in a timely or
cost-effective manner or to achieve or maintain compliance with ISO 9001, the CE
Mark, GMP regulations or other applicable licensing or regulatory requirements
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of
operations and financial condition. See "Business -- Manufacturing."

MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH; RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH ACQUISITIONS

The rapid growth experienced by the Company to date has placed, and could
continue to place, significant demands on the Company's management, operational
and financial resources. In October 1995 and July 1997, respectively, the
Company completed the NeoStar Medical(R) and Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)
Acquisitions. Although the Company has no present commitments or agreements with
respect to any additional material acquisitions, the Company expects to pursue
additional strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or
technologies as a means of expanding its existing product lines and distribution
channels. As the medical devices industry continues to consolidate, the Company
expects to face increasing competition from other companies for available
acquisition opportunities. There can be no assurance that suitable acquisition
candidates will be available, that financing for such acquisitions will be
obtainable on terms acceptable to the Company or that such acquisitions will be
successfully completed. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including (i) the
potential inability to successfully integrate acquired operations and products
or to realize anticipated synergies, economies of scale or other value, (ii)
diversion of management's attention, (iii) responsibility for undiscovered or
contingent liabilities and (iv) loss of key employees of acquired operations.
The relocation of manufacturing operations for acquired product lines to the
Company's manufacturing facility in Manchester, Georgia may also result in
interruptions in production and back orders. See "Business -- Backlog." No
assurance can be given that the Company will not incur problems in integrating
any future acquisition and there can be no assurance that the
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition or any future acquisition will increase the
Company's profitability. Further, the Company's results of operations in fiscal
quarters immediately following a material acquisition may be materially
adversely affected while the Company integrates the acquired business into its
existing operations. Any such problems could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition. In
addition, future acquisitions by the Company may result in dilutive issuances of
equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, large one-time charges and
the creation of goodwill or other intangible assets that could result in
significant amortization expense.

DEPENDENCE ON PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

The Company believes that its competitive position and success has
depended, in part, on and will continue to depend on the ability of the Company
and its licensors to obtain patent protection for its products, to defend
patents once obtained, to preserve its trade secrets and to operate without
infringing upon patents and proprietary rights held by third parties, both in
the United States and in foreign countries. The Company's policy is to protect
its proprietary position by, among other methods, filing United States and
foreign patent applications relating to technology, inventions and improvements
that are important to the development of its business. The Company owns numerous
United States and foreign patents and United States and foreign patent
applications. The Company also is a party to several license agreements with
third parties pursuant to which it has obtained, for varying terms, the right to
make, use and/or sell products that are covered under such license agreement in
consideration for royalty payments. Many of the Company's major products,
including its Circle C(R) acute and chronic catheters and its Infuse-a-Cath(TM)
catheters are subject to such license agreements. There can be no assurance that
the Company or its licensors have or will develop or obtain additional rights to
products or processes that are patentable, that patents will issue from any of
the pending patent applications filed by the Company or that claims allowed will
be sufficient to protect any technology that is licensed to the Company. In
addition, no assurances can be given that any patents issued or licensed to the
Company or other licensing arrangements will not be challenged, invalidated,
infringed or circumvented or that the rights granted thereunder will provide
competitive advantages for the Company's business or
8
<PAGE> 10

products. In such event the business, results of operations and financial
condition of the Company could be materially adversely affected.

A number of medical devices companies, physicians and others have filed
patent applications or received patents to technologies that are similar to
technologies owned or licensed by the Company. There can be no assurance that
the Company is aware of all patents or patent applications that may materially
affect the Company's ability to make, use or sell its products. United States
patent applications are confidential while pending in the United States Patent
and Trademark Office ("PTO"), and patent applications filed in foreign countries
are often first published six or more months after filing. Any conflicts
resulting from third-party patent applications and patents could significantly
reduce the coverage of the patents owned or licensed by the Company and limit
the ability of the Company or its licensors to obtain meaningful patent
protection. If patents are issued to other companies that contain competitive or
conflicting claims, the Company may be required to obtain licenses to those
patents or to develop or obtain alternative technology. There can be no
assurance that the Company would not be delayed or prevented from pursuing the
development or commercialization of its products, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company.

There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other
intellectual property rights in the medical devices industry. Although the
Company has not been a party to any material litigation to enforce any
intellectual property rights held by the Company, or a party to any material
litigation seeking to enforce any rights alleged to be held by others, future
litigation may be necessary to protect patents, trade secrets, copyrights or
"know-how" owned by the Company or to defend the Company against claimed
infringement of the rights of others and to determine the scope and validity of
the proprietary rights of the Company and others. The validity and breadth of
claims covered in medical technology patents involve complex legal and factual
questions for which important legal principles are unresolved. Any such
litigation could result in substantial cost to and diversion of effort by the
Company. Adverse determinations in any such litigation could subject the Company
to significant liabilities to third parties, could require the Company to seek
licenses from third parties and could prevent the Company from manufacturing,
selling or using certain of its products, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and financial
condition.

The Company also relies on trade secrets and proprietary technology that it
seeks to protect, in part, through confidentiality agreements with employees,
consultants and other parties. There can be no assurance that these agreements
will not be breached, that the Company will have adequate remedies for any
breach, that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent
proprietary information or that third parties will not otherwise gain access to
the Company's trade secrets.

The Company also relies upon trademarks and trade names for the development
and protection of brand loyalty and associated goodwill in connection with its
products. The Company's policy is to protect its trademarks, trade names and
associated goodwill by, among other methods, filing United States and foreign
trademark applications relating to its products and business. The Company owns
numerous United States and foreign trademark registrations and applications. The
Company also relies upon trademarks and trade names for which it does not have
pending trademark applications or existing registrations, but in which the
Company has substantial trademark rights. The Company's registered and
unregistered trademark rights relate to the majority of the Company's products,
including products comprising the Circle C(R), Infuse-a-Port(R), Triumph-1(R),
Infuse-a-Cath(TM), LifePort(TM) and Pheres-Flow(TM) product lines. There can be
no assurance that any registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names of
the Company will not be challenged, canceled, infringed, circumvented, or be
declared generic or infringing of other third-party marks or provide any
competitive advantage to the Company. See "Business -- Patents, Trademarks,
Licenses and Proprietary Rights."

POTENTIAL PRODUCT LIABILITY

Because its products are intended to be used in healthcare settings on
patients who are physiologically unstable and may be seriously or critically
ill, the Company's business exposes it to potential product liability risks
which are inherent in the medical devices industry. In addition, many of the
medical devices
9
<PAGE> 11

manufactured and sold by the Company are designed to be implanted in the human
body for extended periods of time. Component failures, manufacturing flaws,
design defects or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks with respect to
these or other products manufactured or sold by the Company could result in
injury to, or death of, a patient. The occurrence of such a problem could result
in product liability claims and/or a recall of, safety alert relating to, or
other FDA or private civil action affecting one or more of the Company's
products or responsible officials. The Company maintains product liability
coverage in amounts that it deems sufficient for its business. There can be no
assurance, however, that such coverage will be available with respect to or
sufficient to satisfy all claims made against the Company or that the Company
will be able to obtain insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in
adequate amounts. Product liability claims or product recalls in the future,
regardless of their ultimate outcome, could result in costly litigation and
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of
operations and financial condition. See "Business -- Product Liability Claims
and Insurance."

FUTURE CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

Prior to 1996, the Company's cash flow from operations was insufficient to
cover its operating expenses, and the Company relied on external financing to
meet its operating cash flow needs. The Company expects that its current cash
and cash equivalents, together with additional cash from operations and the
proceeds of the Offering, will be sufficient to meet its current operating cash
requirements at least through December 31, 1998. However, depending upon the
Company's acquisition activity and results of operations, there can be no
assurance that such resources will be sufficient, in which case the Company
would need to obtain additional financing. Such additional financing could
involve issuances of debt or issuances of equity securities which would be
dilutive to purchasers of the Common Stock offered hereby. Adequate additional
funds, whether from the financial markets or from other sources, may not be
available on a timely basis, on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.
Insufficient funds may cause the Company to delay or abandon some or all of its
product acquisition, licensing, marketing or research and development programs
or opportunities. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources."

NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS

Although the vascular access product industry has not experienced rapid
technological change historically, as the Company's existing products become
more mature, the importance of developing or acquiring, manufacturing and
introducing new products that address the needs of its customers will increase.
The development or acquisition of any such products will entail considerable
time and expense, including acquisition costs, research and development costs,
and the time and expense required to obtain necessary regulatory approvals,
which approvals are not assured, and any of which could adversely affect the
business, results of operations or financial condition of the Company. There can
be no assurance that such development activities will yield products that can be
commercialized profitably or that any product acquisition can be consummated on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. To date, substantially all of the
Company's products have been developed in conjunction with third parties or
acquired as a result of acquisitions consummated by the Company. The inability
of the Company to develop or acquire new products to supplement the Company's
existing product lines could have an adverse impact on the Company's ability to
fully implement its business strategy and further develop its operation.

CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION

The Company's net sales to its five largest customers accounted for 9.3%,
10.7% and 18.1% of net sales during 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. The loss
of, or significant curtailments of purchases by, any of the Company's
significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, results of operations and financial condition.

DEPENDENCE ON KEY SUPPLIERS

The Company purchases raw materials and components for use in manufacturing
its products from approximately 80 suppliers. In fiscal 1997, products purchased
from its three largest suppliers accounted for 39%, 14% and 7%, respectively, of
the Company's total raw material and component purchases. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to maintain its existing supplier
relationships or secure additional
10
<PAGE> 12

suppliers as needed. The loss of a major supplier, the deterioration of the
Company's relationship with a major supplier, changes by a major supplier in the
specifications of the components used in the Company's products, or the failure
of the Company to establish good relationships with major new suppliers could
have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations
and financial condition. See "Business -- Manufacturing."

DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL

The Company's success is substantially dependent on the performance,
contributions and expertise of its executive officers and key employees. The
Company's success to date has been significantly dependent on the contributions
of Marshall B. Hunt, its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and William E.
Peterson, Jr., its President, each of whom will enter into an employment
agreement with the Company at the time of the Offering and on each of whom the
Company maintains key man life insurance in the amount of $1.0 million. The
Company is also dependent on its ability to attract, retain and motivate
additional personnel. The loss of the services of any of its executive officers
or other key employees or the Company's inability to attract, retain or motivate
the necessary personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, results of operations and financial condition. See "Management."

CONTROL BY CERTAIN SHAREHOLDERS

After the Offering, Marshall B. Hunt, William E. Peterson, Jr., and Roy C.
Mallady, Jr. will own approximately 28.4%, 22.7% and 15.9% of the outstanding
Common Stock, respectively (approximately 27.3%, 21.9% and 15.3%, respectively,
if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full). These
shareholders, if they were to act together, would have the power to elect all of
the members of the Company's Board of Directors, amend the Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation of the Company (the "Articles") and the Amended and
Restated Bylaws of the Company (the "Bylaws") and effect or preclude fundamental
corporate transactions involving the Company, including the acceptance or
rejection of proposals relating to a merger of the Company or the acquisition of
the Company by another entity. Accordingly, these shareholders are able to exert
significant influence over the Company, including the ability to control
decisions on matters on which shareholders are entitled to vote. See "Certain
Transactions," "Principal and Selling Shareholders" and "Description of Capital
Stock."

YEAR 2000 ISSUES

The approaching year 2000 could result in challenges related to the
Company's computer software, accounting records and relationships with suppliers
and customers. Management of the Company is studying year 2000 issues and is
seeking to avoid such problems. Based on the Company's review of its business
and operating systems, the Company does not expect to incur material costs with
respect to assessing and remediating year 2000 problems; however, there can be
no assurance that such problems will not be encountered or that the costs
incurred to resolve such problems will not be material.

HEALTHCARE REFORM/PRICING PRESSURE

The healthcare industry in the United States continues to experience
change. In recent years, several healthcare reform proposals have been
formulated by members of Congress. In addition, state legislatures periodically
consider healthcare reform proposals. Federal, state and local government
representatives will, in all likelihood, continue to review and assess
alternative healthcare delivery systems and payment methodologies, and ongoing
public debate of these issues can be expected. Cost containment initiatives,
market pressures and proposed changes in applicable laws and regulations may
have a dramatic effect on pricing or potential demand for medical devices, the
relative costs associated with doing business and the amount of reimbursement by
both government and third-party payors to persons providing medical services. In
particular, the healthcare industry is experiencing market-driven reforms from
forces within the industry that are exerting pressure on healthcare companies to
reduce healthcare costs. Managed care and other healthcare provider
organizations have grown substantially in terms of the percentage of the
population in the United States that receives medical benefits through such
organizations and in terms of the influence and control that they are able to
exert over an increasingly large portion of the healthcare industry. Managed
care organizations are continuing to consolidate and grow, increasing the
ability of these organizations to influence the practices and pricing involved
in the purchase of medical devices, including certain of the products sold by
the Company,
11
<PAGE> 13

which is expected to exert downward pressure on product margins. Both short- and
long-term cost containment pressures, as well as the possibility of continued
regulatory reform, may have an adverse impact on the Company's business, results
of operations and financial condition. See "Business -- Healthcare Reform;
Third-Party Reimbursement."

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

The Company's products and operations are subject to extensive regulation
by numerous governmental authorities, including, but not limited to, the FDA and
state and foreign governmental authorities. In particular, the Company must
obtain specific clearance or approval from the FDA before it can market new
products or certain modified products in the United States. The FDA administers
the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (the "FDC Act"). Under the FDC Act,
medical devices must receive FDA clearance through the Section 510(k)
notification process ("510(k)") or the more lengthy premarket approval ("PMA")
process before they can be sold in the United States. To obtain 510(k) marketing
clearance, a company must show that a new product is "substantially equivalent"
to a product already legally marketed and which does not require PMA approval.
Therefore, it is not always necessary to prove the safety and effectiveness of
the new product in order to obtain 510(k) clearance for such product. To obtain
PMA approval, a company must submit extensive data, including clinical trial
data, to prove the safety, effectiveness and clinical utility of its products.
FDA regulations also require companies to adhere to certain GMP's, which include
testing, quality control, storage, and documentation procedures. Compliance with
applicable regulatory requirements is monitored through periodic site
inspections by the FDA. The process of obtaining such clearances or approvals
can be time-consuming and expensive, and there can be no assurance that all
clearances or approvals sought by the Company will be granted or that FDA review
will not involve delays adversely affecting the marketing and sale of the
Company's products. In addition, the Company is required to comply with FDA
requirements for labeling and promotion of its products. The Federal Trade
Commission also regulates most device advertising.

In addition, international regulatory bodies often establish varying
regulations governing product testing and licensing standards, manufacturing
compliance (e.g., compliance with ISO 9001 standards), packaging requirements,
labeling requirements, import restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax
requirements and pricing and reimbursement levels. The inability or failure of
the Company to comply with the varying regulations or the imposition of new
regulations could restrict the Company's ability to sell its products
internationally and thereby adversely affect the Company's business, results of
operations and financial condition.

Subsequent to an FDA inspection in 1996, the Company received a warning
letter from the FDA Atlanta District Office alleging, among other things, its
failure to report to the FDA certain malfunctions and adverse events that may be
associated with its devices as required by the agency's medical device report
(MDR) regulations. In response to this warning letter, the Company revised its
MDR procedure and submitted it with other corrective actions for review by the
FDA. The FDA responded that the corrective actions described by the Company
appeared to adequately address the agency's concerns. At the conclusion of a
follow-up inspection in 1997, the Company was advised of various inspectional
observations including its alleged failure to submit MDRs on 19 reportable
events. The Company responded to the inspectional observations in writing and at
a meeting with the FDA at the Atlanta District Office at which the
interpretation of the MDR regulations was discussed. The District submitted the
question of the interpretation of the regulations to the FDA headquarters in
Washington, D.C. On March 10, 1998, the Company received a warning letter from
the Atlanta District Office reasserting its interpretation of the MDR
regulations and alleging the Company's failure to report 15 reportable events
and violation of two current GMP requirements. The Company has responded to the
warning letter pledging to submit all substantive reports until it secures
exemptions from the agency on the submission of certain classes of reports and
describing corrective action taken on the alleged current GMP violations. The
Company believes that it has implemented corrective actions that achieve
substantial compliance with the FDA requirements, but there can be no assurance
that an FDA enforcement action will not ensue at a future time or will not
materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations and
financial condition.

12
<PAGE> 14

Failure to comply with applicable federal, state or foreign laws or
regulations could subject the Company to enforcement actions, including, but not
limited to, product seizures, recalls, withdrawal of clearances or approvals and
civil and criminal penalties against the Company or its responsible officials,
any one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, results of operations and financial condition. Federal, state and
foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of medical
devices are subject to future changes, as are administrative interpretations of
regulatory agencies. No assurance can be given that such changes will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of operations and
financial condition. See "Business -- Government Regulation."

LIMITATIONS ON THIRD-PARTY REIMBURSEMENT

In the United States, the Company's products are purchased primarily by
hospitals and medical clinics, which then bill various third-party payors, such
as Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs and private insurance plans,
for the healthcare services provided to patients. Government agencies, private
insurers and other payors determine whether to provide coverage for a particular
procedure and reimburse hospitals for medical treatment at a fixed rate based on
the diagnosis-related group ("DRG") established by the United States Health Care
Financing Administration ("HCFA"). The fixed rate of reimbursement is based on
the procedure performed and is unrelated to the specific devices used in that
procedure. If a procedure is not covered by a DRG, payors may deny
reimbursement. In addition, third-party payors may deny reimbursement if they
determine that the device used in a treatment was unnecessary, inappropriate or
not cost-effective, experimental or used for a non-approved indication.
Reimbursement of procedures implanting the Company's vascular access ports and
catheter products is currently covered under a DRG. There can be no assurance
that reimbursement for such implantation will continue to be available, or that
future reimbursement policies of third-party payors will not adversely affect
the Company's ability to sell its products on a profitable basis. Failure by
hospitals and other users of the Company's products to obtain reimbursement from
third-party payors, or changes in government and private third-party payors'
policies toward reimbursement for procedures employing the Company's products,
would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, results of
operations and financial condition. See "Business -- Healthcare Reform;
Third-Party Reimbursement."

COMPETITION

The medical devices industry is highly competitive and fragmented. The
Company currently competes with many companies in the development, manufacturing
and marketing of vascular access ports, dialysis and apheresis catheters and
related ancillary products. Some of these competitors have substantially greater
capital resources, management resources, research and development staffs, sales
and marketing organizations and experience in the medical devices industry than
the Company. These competitors may succeed in marketing their products more
effectively, pricing their products more competitively, or developing
technologies and products that are more effective than those sold or produced by
the Company or that would render some products offered by the Company
noncompetitive. See "Business -- Competition."

NO PRIOR PUBLIC MARKET; DETERMINATION OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING PRICE;
VOLATILITY OF COMMON STOCK PRICE

Prior to the Offering, there has been no public market for the Common
Stock, and there can be no assurance that an active trading market will develop
or be sustained. The initial public offering price will be determined by
negotiations between the Company and Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation
("CSFBC"), BancAmerica Robertson Stephens and NationsBanc Montgomery Securities
LLC based on several factors and may not be indicative of the market price of
the Common Stock after the Offering. The market price of the Common Stock is
likely to be highly volatile and may be significantly affected by factors such
as actual or anticipated fluctuations in the Company's results of operations and
other factors. In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations which could affect the market price of
the Common Stock offered hereby. These broad market fluctuations may adversely
affect the market price of the Common Stock. The market prices of the common
stock of many publicly-held medical devices companies have in the past been, and
are expected to continue to be, volatile. Announcements of technological or
medical innovations or new commercial products by the Company or its
competitors, developments or disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights,
changes in regulatory or medical reimbursement policies,
13
<PAGE> 15

and economic and other external factors may have a significant impact on the
market price and marketability of the Common Stock. See "Underwriting."

FACTORS INHIBITING TAKEOVER

Certain provisions of the Articles and Bylaws may delay or prevent a
takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best interest. Among
other things, these provisions establish certain advance notice procedures for
shareholder proposals to be considered at shareholders' meetings, provide for
the classification of the Board of Directors, provide that only the Board of
Directors or shareholders owning 75% or more of the outstanding Common Stock may
call special meetings of the shareholders and establish supermajority voting
requirements with respect to the amendment of certain provisions of the Articles
and Bylaws. In addition, the Board of Directors can authorize and issue shares
of Preferred Stock, no par value (the "Preferred Stock"), issuable in one or
more series, with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting or other rights of holders of the Common Stock. The terms of the
Preferred Stock that might be issued could potentially prohibit the Company's
consummation of any merger, reorganization, sale of all or substantially all of
its assets, liquidation or other extraordinary corporate transaction without the
approval of the holders of the outstanding shares of such stock. Furthermore,
certain provisions of the Georgia Business Corporation Code (the "Georgia Code")
may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the
Company. See "Description of Capital Stock."

DILUTION

The initial public offering price of the Common Stock offered hereby is
substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of the Common
Stock. Therefore, purchasers of Common Stock offered hereby will incur immediate
and substantial dilution, and may incur additional dilution upon the future
exercise of stock options. See "Dilution."

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Sales of a substantial number of shares of Common Stock in the public
market following the Offering could adversely affect the market price for the
Common Stock. The Company and certain of its directors, officers and
shareholders have agreed with the Underwriters not to sell or otherwise dispose
of any shares of Common Stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this
Prospectus without the prior written consent of CSFBC (the "Lock-Up"), except
issuances by the Company to optionees pursuant to the exercise of stock options
granted under the Stock Incentive Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, persons
who are bound by a Lock-Up will be permitted to transfer shares of Common Stock
or other securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any
shares of Common Stock of which such persons are the beneficial owner to (i) the
Company, (ii) shareholders of the Company who are bound by the terms of a
similar Lock-Up and (iii) any donees of such persons who receive such securities
of the Company as a bona fide gift or any affiliate of such persons provided
that such donees or affiliates agree in writing to be bound by the terms of a
similar Lock-Up (each a "Permitted Transfer"). Beginning 90 days after the date
of this Prospectus, all 2,047,238 shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Mallady
will be eligible for sale in the public market, subject to compliance with the
provisions of Rule 144 ("Rule 144") under the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Securities Act"). Beginning 180 days after the date of this Prospectus,
assuming that CSFBC does not consent to any sales prior to such time or a
Permitted Transfer does not occur, an additional 7,179,762 shares of Common
Stock outstanding on the date of this Prospectus and not otherwise offered and
sold in this Offering will become eligible for sale in the public market,
subject to compliance with the provisions of Rule 144. Of such aggregate
9,227,000 shares, 3,645,732 shares are held by Mr. Hunt, the Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, 2,047,238 shares are held by
Mr. Mallady, the Vice Chairman of the Board, and 2,921,890 shares are held by
Mr. Peterson, the President and a director of the Company, each of whom is an
"affiliate" of the Company within the meaning of Rule 144, and may, therefore,
only be sold in the public market in compliance with the volume limitations and
other requirements of Rule 144. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale,"
"Underwriting" and "Principal and Selling Shareholders."

14
<PAGE> 16

USE OF PROCEEDS

The net proceeds to the Company from the Offering are estimated to be
approximately $32.6 million (approximately $39.4 million if the Underwriters'
over-allotment option is exercised in full). The Company intends to use the net
proceeds of the Offering as follows: (i) an aggregate of $25.0 million to repay
indebtedness consisting of $23.5 million principal amount outstanding under a
$26.5 million credit facility with NationsCredit (the "Credit Facility") and
$1.5 million principal amount outstanding under a note originally issued to
Sirrom Capital Corporation ("Sirrom") in connection with the NeoStar
Medical(R)Acquisition (the "Sirrom Note") and presently owned by NationsCredit;
(ii) an aggregate of $3.3 million to repay obligations relating to the NeoStar
Medical(R) Acquisition consisting of $1.8 million payable in respect of
non-compete agreements entered into with certain shareholders of NeoStar
Medical(R) and $1.5 million principal outstanding under a promissory note issued
to NeoStar Holding, Inc. (the "Acquisition Note"); and (iii) the balance of
approximately $4.3 million for working capital and general corporate purposes
including, among other things, the funding of acquisitions of complementary
businesses, products or technologies, although the Company has no present
commitments or agreements with respect to any additional material acquisitions,
as well as the acquisition of certain additional office space in Atlanta,
Georgia from an affiliated party. See "Certain Transactions" and Notes 6 and 11
of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility were used to finance the
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition and to redeem warrants to purchase Common
Stock issued to a former lender. Outstanding indebtedness under the Credit
Facility bears interest at floating rates based on NationsCredit's Commercial
Paper Rate plus 4.25% to 5.25% (9.84% to 10.84% at December 31, 1997) and
matures upon the earlier of the receipt by the Company of the proceeds from the
Offering or July 1, 2004. The Sirrom Note bears interest at a rate of 13.75% per
annum and matures September 25, 2000. The Acquisition Note is a non-interest
bearing note (other than a $37,235 portion thereof which bears interest at the
prime rate plus 1%) with principal payments due monthly through June 30, 2000,
and five payments due on various dates through October 31, 2003, all of which
payments are due upon completion of the Offering. Pending use of the net
proceeds as described above, the Company will invest the net proceeds in
investment grade, interest-bearing securities. The Company will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of Common Stock by the Selling Shareholders. As a result
of the repayment of amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility, pledges of
shares of Common Stock by Messrs. Hunt, Peterson and Mallady will be terminated.

DIVIDEND POLICY

The Company anticipates that following the completion of the Offering
earnings will be retained for use in developing and growing its business and,
therefore, does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion
of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon the Company's financial
condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions in
financing arrangements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems
relevant.

15
<PAGE> 17

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of
December 31, 1997 (i) on an actual basis and (ii) as adjusted to give effect to
the sale of 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock offered by the Company hereby
(after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated Offering
expenses payable by the Company), the application of the net proceeds to the
Company from the Offering as set forth herein and the exercise of the
NationsCredit Warrant. See "Use of Proceeds." This table should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto included in this Prospectus.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AT DECEMBER 31, 1997
--------------------------------------
PUT WARRANT AS
ACTUAL RESCISSION(2) ADJUSTED(3)
-------- ------------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term
debt...................................................... $ 1,959 $ -- $ 199
======== ======== ========
Long-term debt.............................................. $ 23,971 $ -- $ 43
Put warrant repurchase obligation........................... 11,000 (11,000) --
Shareholders' equity(1):
Preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share; 5,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
(actual); and no shares issued and outstanding (as
adjusted).............................................. -- -- --
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 9,419,458 shares outstanding (actual); and
12,800,000 shares outstanding (as adjusted)............ 9 -- 13
Additional paid-in capital................................ 1,271 9,900 43,768
Shareholders' notes receivable............................ (399) -- (399)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (12,031) 1,100 (12,359)
-------- -------- --------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit).............. (11,150) 11,000 31,023
-------- -------- --------
Total capitalization.............................. $ 23,821 $ -- $ 31,066
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) Does not include (i) 40,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of the Outside Directors' Options (ii) 99,600 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon the exercise of the SAR Conversion Options, (iii) 10,000
shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Executive's
Options, (iv) 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the
Advisor's Options, (v) 350,400 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance
under the Stock Incentive Plan, (vi) 500,000 shares of Common Stock reserved
for issuance upon the exercise of the Premier Warrant and (vii) 45,328
shares of Common Stock issuable to an affiliate of the Company after the
Offering and certain additional shares of Common Stock which may become
issuable to such affiliate and another affiliate of the Company as
consulting fees. See "Management -- Stock Incentive Plan" and "-- 1995 Stock
Appreciation Rights Plan," "Description of Capital Stock -- Premier
Warrant," "Certain Transactions -- Consulting Agreements with Directors" and
"-- Consulting Agreement with Healthcare Alliance."

(2) Gives effect to the January 29, 1998 agreement with NationsCredit which
rescinded the put rights associated with the NationsCredit Warrant.
(3) Gives effect to the sale of 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock offered by the
Company hereby at an assumed initial public offering price of $14.00 per
share and the application of the net proceeds to the Company from the
Offering as set forth herein, including an increase to accumulated deficit
due to an immediate write-off of debt issue costs and debt discounts
totaling $1,428,000. See "Use of Proceeds."

16
<PAGE> 18

DILUTION

Net tangible book value per share is equal to the Company's tangible assets
less total liabilities, divided by the total number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding. The deficit in net tangible book value of the Company as of
December 31, 1997 was approximately $(26.9) million, or $(2.85) per share. After
giving effect to the reclassification of the put warrant repurchase obligation
from a liability to stockholders' equity, necessitated by the January 29, 1998
rescission of the put feature, the sale of 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock
offered by the Company hereby at an assumed Offering price of $14.00 per share
(after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated Offering
expenses payable by the Company resulting in estimated net proceeds of $32.6
million) including anticipated warrant conversions immediately prior to
consummation of the Offering and application of certain anti-dilution rights,
the net tangible book value of the Company as of December 31, 1997 would have
been approximately $16.7 million, or $1.31 per share. This represents an
immediate increase of $2.86 per share to existing shareholders and warrant
holders and an immediate dilution of $12.69 per share to purchasers of shares of
Common Stock in the Offering. The following table illustrates this per share
dilution:

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Assumed initial public offering price per share............. $14.00
Net tangible book value per share at December 31, 1997.... $(2.85)
Increase attributable to rescission of the put feature.... 1.17
Increase attributable to conversion of the warrant and
application of anti-dilution rights.................... 0.13
Increase attributable to the Offering..................... 2.86
------
Net tangible book value per share after the Offering........ 1.31
------
Dilution per share to purchasers in the Offering(1)......... $12.69
======
</TABLE>

The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of December 31,
1997, the number of shares of Common Stock acquired from the Company, the
aggregate cash consideration paid and the average price per share paid by the
existing shareholders and to be paid by investors purchasing shares of Common
Stock from the Company in the Offering at an assumed Offering price of $14.00
per share (before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
Offering expenses):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AVERAGE
PRICE PER
SHARES PURCHASED TOTAL CONSIDERATION SHARE
-------------------- --------------------- ---------
NUMBER PERCENT AMOUNT PERCENT
---------- ------- ----------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Existing Shareholders(1)(2)....... 10,200,000 79.7% $ 955 --% $ --
New Investors(2).................. 2,600,000 20.3 36,400,000 100 14.00
---------- ---- ----------- ---
Total................... 12,800,000 100% $36,400,955 100%
========== ==== =========== ===
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) Includes 765,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the
NationsCredit Warrant and 15,550 shares of Common Stock issuable under
certain anti-dilution provisions. Does not include (i) 40,000 shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Outside Directors' Options
(ii) 99,600 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the SAR
Conversion Options, (iii) 10,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the
exercise of the Executive's Options, (iv) 10,000 shares of Common Stock
issuable upon exercise of the Advisor's Options, (v) 350,400 shares of
Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan, (vi)
500,000 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of
the Premier Warrant and (vii) 45,328 shares of Common Stock issuable to an
affiliate of the Company after the Offering and certain additional shares of
Common Stock which may become issuable to such affiliate and another
affiliate of the Company as consulting fees. See "Management -- Stock
Incentive Plan" and "-- 1995 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan," "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations -- Liquidity and Capital Resources," "Description of Capital
Stock -- Premier Warrant," "Certain Transactions -- Consulting Agreements
with Directors" and "-- Consulting Agreement with Healthcare Alliance."

(2) Sales by the Selling Shareholders in the Offering will reduce the number of
shares held by existing shareholders to 9,327,000 shares, or approximately
72.9% of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding, and will increase the
number of shares held by new investors to 3,473,000 shares, or approximately
27.1% of the total shares of Common Stock outstanding after the Offering.
See "Principal and Selling Shareholders."

17
<PAGE> 19

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

The following selected financial data for the years ended December 31,
1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997 and as of December 31, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996
and 1997 are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by Coopers &
Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public accountants, and which are included
elsewhere in this Prospectus. The unaudited pro forma as adjusted information
presented below has been prepared based upon the audited financial statements of
the Company and unaudited financial data for Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) for the
period ended July 15, 1997. The selected financial data should be read in
conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company and Notes thereto included in this Prospectus.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
------ ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------
PRO FORMA
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(1)(2)
-------- -----------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales................................. $3,629 $4,147 $5,003 $ 7,052 $ 15,798 $ 22,818
Cost of goods sold........................ 1,786 1,997 2,227 2,997 6,273 8,660
------ ------ ------ ------- -------- --------
Gross profit.............................. 1,843 2,150 2,776 4,055 9,525 14,158
Selling, general and administrative
expenses(3)............................. 2,361 2,421 2,921 4,560 6,476 8,111
------ ------ ------ ------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss)................... (518) (271) (145) (505) 3,049 6,047
Interest (expense) income................. (55) (160) (242) (733) (3,971) 55
Accretion of value of put warrant
repurchase obligation(3)................ -- -- -- -- (8,000) --
Other income.............................. 5 101 -- 54 70 70
------ ------ ------ ------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary item...................... (568) (330) (387) (1,184) (8,852) 6,172
Income tax benefit (expense)(4)........... -- -- 7 -- (320) (2,379)
Effect of conversion to C Corporation
status.................................. -- -- (7) -- -- --
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment
of debt................................. -- -- (70) -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)(4)...................... $ (568) $ (330) $ (457) $(1,184) $ (9,172) $ 3,793
====== ====== ====== ======= ======== ========
Loss per share before extraordinary
item -- basic and diluted............... $ -- $ -- $ (.04) $ -- $ -- $ --
Net income (loss) per share -- basic and
diluted................................. $ (.07) $ (.04) $ (.05) $ (.13) $ (.97) $ 0.30
Weighted average common shares
outstanding............................. 8,318 8,333 9,144 9,419 9,419 12,800
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
------ ------ ------ ------- ----------------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED(2)
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................. $ 62 $ 600 $ 394 $ 218 $ 2,894 $ 6,841
Working capital........................... (415) 238 1,500 1,018 6,842 12,886
Total assets.............................. 1,449 2,222 6,894 6,176 31,577 35,262
Long-term debt, net of current
maturities.............................. 379 1,227 4,907 5,053 23,971 43
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)...... (303) (438) (1,024) (1,916) (11,150) 31,023
</TABLE>

- ---------------

18
<PAGE> 20

costs of the acquisition, (iv) removal of accretion value of the put warrant
repurchase obligation, and (v) related tax effects.
(2) Adjusted to reflect net proceeds of $32,600 from the sale of 2,600 shares of
Common Stock offered by the Company hereby (after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated Offering expenses payable by the
Company) and the application thereof as set forth herein. See "Use of
Proceeds." The adjustments include a reduction of interest expense, an
increase in compensation costs following the Offering and related tax
effects.

(3) See Notes 6 and 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
for a discussion of this non-recurring item.

(4) Pro forma for 1993 and 1994 due to the Company's status as an S Corporation
for tax purposes. Tax attributes of the Company were passed through to the
Company owners.

19
<PAGE> 21

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto, and other financial information
included elsewhere in this Prospectus.

BACKGROUND

The Company began its operations in February 1990 as a distributor of
medical devices and began to distribute vascular access devices in the first
quarter 1990. In November 1992, the Company entered into a collaborative effort
with a leading heart valve manufacturer to design and develop a new line of
vascular access ports. This new line of ports, the Triumph-1(R) line, was
introduced in September 1994. The Company continues to market the Triumph-1(R)
line of vascular access ports, with this product line having cumulative sales of
over 30,000 units to date. In May 1995, the Company began to distribute the
NeoStar Medical(R) line of hemodialysis catheters, and in October 1995 the
Company exercised its option to acquire NeoStar Medical(R) for an aggregate
purchase price of $4.0 million payable in a combination of cash and promissory
notes. In March 1996, the Company began the construction of a 20,000 square foot
manufacturing, distribution and administrative facility in Manchester, Georgia.
The Company began manufacturing the NeoStar Medical(R) product line at this
facility in October 1996 and recently expanded this facility to 45,000 square
feet. In July 1997, the Company acquired the port business of
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) for $19.5 million in cash. The primary product lines
obtained in the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition included the LifePort(TM) and
Infuse-a-Port(R) vascular access ports, and the Infuse-a-Cath(TM) line of
catheters. The Company had revenues of $7.1 million from these products from the
date of acquisition through December 31, 1997.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items
contained in the Company's statements of operations expressed as a percentage of
net sales:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1995 1996 1997
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales................................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of goods sold.......................................... 44.5 42.5 39.7
----- ----- -----
Gross profit................................................ 55.5 57.5 60.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses................ 58.4 64.6 41.0
----- ----- -----
Operating income (loss)................................... (2.9) (7.1) 19.3
----- ----- -----
Other income (expense):
Interest expense.......................................... (4.8) (10.4) (25.1)
Accretion of value of put warrant repurchase obligation... -- -- (50.6)
Other income.............................................. -- 0.7 0.4
----- ----- -----
Loss before income taxes and extraordinary item............. (7.7) (16.8) (56.0)
Income tax benefit (expense)................................ 0.1 -- (2.0)
Effect of conversion to C Corporation status................ (0.1) -- --
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt.......... (1.4) -- --
----- ----- -----
Net loss.................................................... (9.1)% (16.8)% (58.0)%
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>

Year Ended December 31, 1997 compared to Year Ended December 31, 1996

Net Sales. Net sales increased 124.0% to $15.8 million in 1997, from $7.1
million in 1996. This increase is primarily attributable to (i) an overall
increase in sales of ports of $7.3 million, with $7.0 million of this increase
from sales of the port product lines acquired in the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)
Acquisition, and (ii) an overall increase in sales of catheters of $1.3 million,
with triple lumen catheter sales increasing $900,000, primarily

20
<PAGE> 22

due to the expansion of this product to the Company's full sales force in 1996.
The overall increase in sales of catheters is primarily the result of a sales
volume increase and to a lesser extent a slight price increase.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 134.9% to $9.5 million in 1997, from
$4.1 million in 1996. Gross margin increased to 60.3% in 1997, from 57.5% in
1996. The margin increase is attributable to the port product line acquired in
the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition having a higher margin than the Company's
existing port product line and an increase in sales of triple lumen catheters
which have a higher margin than the Company's other catheters. This margin
increase was offset somewhat by increased overall international sales, which
generally have lower profit margins than domestic sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 42.0% to $6.5 million in 1997, from $4.6
million in 1996. This increase is primarily attributable to increased
compensation expenses associated with the development of the Company's sales
force. Selling, general and administrative expenses declined as a percentage of
net sales to 41.0% in 1997 from 64.6% in 1996 due to substantial revenue growth
in 1997.

Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased to $4.0 million in 1997
from $700,000 in 1996. Such expense increased as a percentage of net sales to
25.1% in 1997 from 10.4% in 1996. The increase is primarily a result of the
amortization of deferred loan costs and interest expense in connection with the
Credit Facility, including $1.8 million of amortization related to the debt
discount associated with the NationsCredit Warrant.

Accretion of Value of Put Warrant Repurchase Obligation. In connection
with the Credit Facility, the Company issued the NationsCredit Warrant which
contains a put feature. The Company recorded a charge of $8.0 million equalling
the estimated increase in the value of the NationsCredit Warrant from its
original estimated value of $3.0 million. On January 29, 1998 the Company
entered into an agreement with NationsCredit which rescinded the put feature of
the NationsCredit Warrant. This will result in a $1.1 million decrease in the
liability to be reflected as an increase to income. The remaining $9.9 million
will be reclassified from the liability to additional paid in capital. Such
adjustments will be reflected in the Company's first quarter results. See Notes
6 and 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

Taxes. Income taxes increased to $300,000 in 1997 from $0 in 1996. Prior
to 1997, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its net
deferred tax assets which were primarily attributable to its net operating loss
carryforwards. During 1997, the Company generated taxable income sufficient to
fully utilize the net operating loss carryforwards. The provision for income
taxes in 1997 differs from the amount which would have been calculated by
applying the federal statutory rate of 34% due primarily to non-deductible
interest and accretion of the put warrant repurchase obligation of approximately
$9.8 million.

Year Ended December 31, 1996 compared to Year Ended December 31, 1995

Net Sales. Net sales increased 40.9% to $7.1 million in 1996, from $5.0
million in 1995. This increase was primarily attributable to a $2.3 million
increase in catheter sales resulting from sales of proprietary products acquired
in the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition and includes $300,000 in sales resulting
from the introduction of triple lumen catheters. The increase in catheter sales
was partially offset by a $400,000 decline in port sales which resulted
primarily from the Company's reallocation of resources to establish the catheter
line of business and commence manufacturing this product line at its newly
opened facility in Manchester, Georgia and a decline in sales to a significant
customer.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 46.1% to $4.1 million in 1996, from
$2.8 million in 1995. Gross margin increased to 57.5% in 1996, from 55.5% in
1995, primarily as a result of (i) a shift in the focus of the Company's
operations from distribution to manufacturing achieved through consummation of
the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition, (ii) increased sales of higher margin
catheter products as part of the overall mix of sales and (iii) increased sales
of higher margin port products resulting in improved margins in the port product
line.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 56.1% to $4.6 million in 1996, from $2.9
million in 1995, and such expenses increased as a percentage of net sales to
64.6% in 1996 from 58.4% in 1995. These increases resulted primarily from the
full year effect during

21
<PAGE> 23

1996 of the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition, including the cost of moving the
NeoStar Medical(R) business to Manchester, Georgia and the amortization of the
goodwill arising from this transaction.

Interest Expense. Net interest expense was $700,000 in 1996 compared to
$200,000 in 1995, due to borrowings under the Sirrom Note and promissory notes
issued to Columbus Bank and Trust Company ("CB&T") and the former shareholders
of NeoStar Medical(R).

Taxes. Effective January 1, 1995, the shareholders of the Company elected
to be taxed as a C Corporation and, accordingly, revoked its S Corporation
status. As a result, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability and
recognized income tax expense at the effective date of the change.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Historically, the Company's primary sources of liquidity have been from
financing activities. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities,
derived primarily from bank lines of credit was $1.8 million, $(200,000) and
$20.4 million during 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. The primary use of cash
provided by operations is an increase in accounts receivable and prepaid
expenses and other assets. The Company believes these accounts will continue to
increase during 1998. The Company used $20.4 million in investing activities,
$19.5 million of which was used in the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition.

On July 15, 1997, the Company entered into a $26.5 million Credit Facility
with NationsCredit. The Credit Facility provides the Company with a term loan in
the amount of $21.5 million repayable in 24 quarterly installments ranging from
$537,500 to $1.075 million (the "Tranche A Loan"), a term loan in the amount of
$2.0 million repayable in four quarterly installments of $500,000 each (the
"Tranche B Loan") and a revolving line of credit (the "Working Capital Line") of
up to $3.0 million repayable on the earlier of July 1, 2004 or the date on which
all amounts outstanding under the Tranche A Loan and the Tranche B Loan have
been repaid. Additionally, NationsCredit effectively purchased the Sirrom Note.
Borrowings under the Working Capital Line and Tranche A Loan bear interest at
NationsCredit's Commercial Paper Rate plus 4.25% (9.84% at December 31, 1997).
Borrowings under the Tranche B Loan bear interest at NationsCredit's Commercial
Paper Rate plus 5.25% (10.84% at December 31, 1997). Subject to certain
limitations, amounts outstanding under each of the Tranche A Loan, the Tranche B
Loan and the Working Capital Line may be prepaid at the Company's option
subject, in certain cases, to the payment of a prepayment premium of 3.00%.
Amounts outstanding under the Tranche A Loan and the Tranche B Loan are
mandatorily prepayable, without penalty, in increments upon the occurrence of
certain events, including, without limitation, issuances by the Company of
Common Stock and other equity securities the proceeds of which exceed $250,000
and consummation by the Company of certain asset sales. The Credit Facility
prohibits or restricts the Company from many actions, including paying dividends
and incurring or assuming other indebtedness or liens.

The Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by liens on
substantially all of the Company's assets, including inventory, accounts
receivable and general intangibles and a pledge of the stock of the Company's
subsidiaries. The Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are also
guaranteed by each of the Company's subsidiaries (the "Guarantees"). The
obligations of such subsidiaries (other than Horizon Acquisition Corp.) under
the Guarantees are secured by liens on substantially all of their respective
assets, including inventory, accounts receivable and general intangibles. As
additional security, each of Marshall B. Hunt, William E. Peterson, Jr. and Roy
C. Mallady, Jr. has pledged all shares of Common Stock of the Company owned by
him.

As of January 31, 1998, there was a $21.5 million outstanding principal
balance under the Tranche A Loan, a $2.0 million outstanding principal balance
under the Tranche B Loan and a zero outstanding principal balance under the
Working Capital Line.

As additional consideration for the Credit Facility, the Company granted to
NationsCredit the NationsCredit Warrant, expiring in 2007, to purchase up to,
assuming the consummation by the Company of the Offering, 765,000 shares of
Common Stock at an exercise price of $.001 per share, which represents
approximately 7.5% of the outstanding Common Stock on a fully-diluted basis.
NationsCredit has indicated to the Company that it intends to exercise the
NationsCredit Warrant and sell a portion of the shares of Common Stock issuable
thereunder to a third party and the balance of such shares in the Offering.

22
<PAGE> 24

All amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility will become immediately
due and payable upon consummation of the Offering and the Credit Facility will
terminate. The Company intends to enter into the New Credit Facility (as
hereinafter defined) after the Offering.

In connection with the closing of the Credit Facility, on July 15, 1997
NationsCredit purchased the $1.5 million Sirrom Note from Sirrom. The Sirrom
Note bears interest at the rate of 13.75% per annum, matures September 25, 2000
and repayment thereof is guaranteed by Horizon Acquisition Corp, one of the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries. As additional security, Horizon Acquisition
Corp. originally granted to Sirrom a security interest, which was transferred to
NationsCredit, in its accounts receivable and inventory. At January 31, 1998,
there was a $1.5 million outstanding principal balance under the Sirrom Note.
All amounts outstanding under the Sirrom Note will be repaid upon consummation
of the Offering and the Sirrom Note will be extinguished.

Upon the consummation of the Offering and repayment of all amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility, NationsCredit has committed to extend to
the Company a $50.0 million revolving credit facility collateralized by a first
lien on all of the Company's assets and guaranteed by the Company's subsidiaries
(the "New Credit Facility"). The New Credit Facility has a $10.0 million
sublimit for working capital purposes, $3.0 million of which may be applied to
letters of credit issued for the Company with respect to acquisitions. The
remaining $40.0 million will be available to the Company to finance acquisitions
as approved by NationsCredit and certain other lenders. The interest rate under
the New Credit Facility is, at the Company's option, (i) the 30-day commercial
paper rate plus 325 basis points, (ii) the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 325 basis
points or (iii) the floating prime rate plus 50 basis points.

The Company has established a capital expenditure budget of approximately
$1.0 million for 1998, including approximately $100,000 for computer hardware
and software, approximately $50,000 for warehouse improvements, approximately
$50,000 for additional leasehold improvements related to planned increases in
personnel, approximately $300,000 for additional equipment, approximately
$25,000 for additional office furniture and equipment and approximately $475,000
for additional office space to be purchased from CMI. See "Certain
Transactions -- Agreements with CMI."

The Company previously has not paid salaries to its CEO and President.
Salaries will be paid upon completion of the Offering in accordance with the
Employment Agreements (as hereinafter defined). Estimated fair value
compensation for 1995, 1996 and 1997 of $215,000, $320,000 and $365,000,
respectively, has been recorded in the historical financial statements of the
Company with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.

The Company's principal working capital requirements relate to the
acquisition of inventory and carrying of receivables. The Company believes that
the current level of working capital and the proceeds to the Company of the
Offering will enable it to meet its liquidity requirements through December 31,
1998.

HISTORICAL RESULTS -- STRATO PORT BUSINESS

As discussed in Note 13 of the Company's historical financial statements
included elsewhere in this Prospectus, on July 15, 1997, the Company, together
with Arrow International, Inc. ("Arrow"), an unrelated entity, purchased all of
the stock of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) from Pfizer, Inc. ("Pfizer") for a purchase
price of $21.25 million. Strato produces vascular access products (the "Port
Business") and implantable infusion pumps (the "Pump Business"). Under the
purchase agreement, the Company acquired 275,294 shares of the stock of
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) for $19.5 million and Arrow acquired 24,706 shares of the
stock of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) (the "Arrow Shares") for $1.75 million. On that
same date, the Company then sold the Pump Business and its related assets to
Arrow in exchange for the Arrow shares and Arrow's assumption of certain
liabilities of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM), leaving the Company with the Port
Business. The historical financial statements of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM), which
have been included elsewhere in this Prospectus, include the results of
operations of both the Port Business and the Pump Business as the entire company
was jointly purchased by the Company and Arrow. The two businesses were
historically managed together, and the manufacturing facility, production and
management personnel, sales force and customer base were shared. Pfizer financed
the operations of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) as one entity and did not report its
results according to product distinction.

23
<PAGE> 25

The Port Business of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) has historically been profitable
while the Pump Business has historically been unprofitable.
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) and Pfizer had invested extensively in the Pump Business
through research and development efforts and in marketing efforts to bring new
pump products to the market. Such costs have not historically generated sales
volumes to bring the Pump Business to profitability.

The following table sets forth the Company's estimate of the statement of
operations data for the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Port Business for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the period January 1, 1997 to June 30, 1997. This
information is unaudited but has been prepared on a basis consistent with the
audited financial statements of Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM), included elsewhere
herein and, in the Company's opinion, includes all adjustments necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)
Port Business for the periods presented.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales................................................ $15,897,631 $14,677,359 $6,044,494
Gross profit............................................. 10,566,582 9,095,164 3,914,985
Total operating expenses................................. 5,904,444 12,387,708 2,427,076
Pre-tax income........................................... 4,350,013 3,840,130 1,527,323
</TABLE>

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which requires the reporting and display of comprehensive
income and its components in an entity's financial statements, and SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which
specifies revised guidelines for determining an entity's operating segments and
the type and level of financial information to be required. The Company is
required to adopt these standards in 1998. The Company does not expect the
impact of these pronouncements to be material.

QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following table sets forth quarterly statement of operations data for
1996 and 1997. This quarterly information is unaudited but has been prepared on
a basis consistent with the Company's audited financial statements presented
elsewhere herein and, in the Company's opinion, includes all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair
presentation of the information for the quarters presented. The operating
results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future
period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED,
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1996 1996 1996 1996
--------- -------- ------------- ------------
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales........................................... $1,696 $1,765 $ 1,848 $ 1,743
Cost of goods sold.................................. 722 736 791 748
------ ------ ------- -------
Gross profit........................................ 974 1,029 1,057 995
Selling, general and administrative expenses........ 1,085 1,151 1,123 1,201
------ ------ ------- -------
Operating income (loss)............................. (111) (122) (66) (206)
Interest expense.................................... (166) (169) (195) (203)
Other income (expense).............................. 13 56 -- (15)
------ ------ ------- -------
Loss before income taxes............................ (264) (235) (261) (424)
Income tax benefit (expense)........................ -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------- -------
Net loss............................................ $ (264) $ (235) $ (261) $ (424)
====== ====== ======= =======
Net loss per share -- basic and diluted............. $ (.03) $ (.02) $ (.03) $ (.05)
====== ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>

24
<PAGE> 26

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1997 1997 1997 1997
--------- -------- ------------- ------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales........................................... $1,941 $2,216 $ 5,161 $ 6,480
Cost of goods sold.................................. 814 990 2,005 2,464
------ ------ ------- -------
Gross profit........................................ 1,127 1,226 3,156 4,016
Selling, general and administrative expenses........ 1,116 1,194 1,958 2,208
------ ------ ------- -------
Operating income (loss)............................. 11 32 1,198 1,808
Interest expense.................................... (175) (172) (1,668) (1,956)
Accretion of value of put warrant repurchase
obligation........................................ -- -- (3,636) (4,364)
Other income (expense).............................. 11 11 36 12
------ ------ ------- -------
Loss before income taxes............................ (153) (129) (4,070) (4,500)
Income tax benefit (expense)........................ -- -- -- (320)
------ ------ ------- -------
Net loss............................................ $ (153) $ (129) $(4,070) $(4,820)
====== ====== ======= =======
Net loss per share -- basic and diluted............. $ (.02) $ (.01) $ (.43) $ (.51)
====== ====== ======= =======
</TABLE>

25
<PAGE> 27

BUSINESS

GENERAL

The Company believes that it derives significant competitive advantage from
its sales and marketing organization of over 50 full-time sales representatives
and six distributors employing approximately 70 sales representatives and that
this organization will enable the Company to effectively market a broader line
of vascular access products and achieve greater penetration in its existing
product markets. The Company's direct sales force focuses primarily on vascular
surgeons who implant vascular access devices and other physicians and clinicians
who utilize vascular access devices in the delivery of treatments. The Company's
marketing strategy emphasizes the importance of building relationships with
these medical professionals in order to provide such professionals with the
benefits of the Company's broad knowledge of vascular access products and
procedures and focused clinical support. These relationships also facilitate the
Company's ability to modify its product lines in response to new clinical
protocols and to meet its customers' changing needs. The Company also has a
network of distributors which enhances its domestic marketing efforts and
markets the Company's products in 53 countries outside the United States.

The vascular access product industry is highly fragmented and is comprised
of several larger medical supply companies with diversified product lines and a
number of smaller niche manufacturers with limited vascular access product
lines. The Company believes there will be significant acquisition opportunities
in the vascular access product industry in the future as larger companies seek
to divest non-core business segments and certain smaller niche manufacturers
seek to combine with larger vascular access product companies. The Company has
grown significantly through the completion of two strategic acquisitions and
intends to continue to pursue strategic opportunities to acquire new and
complementary products and technologies. In October 1995, the Company entered
the market for hemodialysis catheters by acquiring NeoStar Medical(R), the maker
of the Circle C(R) line of catheters, and in July 1997 the Company significantly
expanded its line of vascular access ports by acquiring Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM),
a subsidiary of Pfizer, the maker of the LifePort(TM), Infuse-a-Port(R) and
Infuse-a-Cath(TM) lines of vascular access products. As a result of the
successful integration of the acquired product lines from these acquisitions and
the growth of its own product lines, the Company's net sales have increased from
$3.6 million in 1993 to $15.8 million in 1997 ($22.8 million in 1997 on a pro
forma basis).

The Company's vascular access ports are used primarily in systemic or
regional short- and long-term cancer treatment protocols that require frequent
infusions of highly concentrated or toxic medications (such as chemotherapy
agents, antibiotics or analgesics) and frequent blood samplings. The Company's
lines of vascular access ports, which it believes are the most comprehensive in
the industry, consist of the following families of products: (i) Triumph-1(R),
which the Company believes contains one of the highest strength silicone
catheter systems available in the market; (ii) LifePort(TM), certain models of
which include the patented Bayonet(TM) locking system to ensure the integrity of
the port/catheter connection; and (iii) Infuse-a-Port(R), which was one of the
first implantable ports introduced to the market and continues to enjoy
significant brand loyalty among physicians.

The Company's catheters are used primarily in hemodialysis and apheresis
procedures and include the following families of products: (i) dual lumen
hemodialysis catheters, which utilize the Company's unique Circle C(R)
technology to obtain the highest flow rates of comparably sized catheters; (ii)
Pheres-Flow(TM) triple lumen catheters, which are the only triple lumen
catheters designed exclusively for the stem cell apheresis protocol and have
streamlined the surgical procedures required to complete such protocols; and
(iii) Infuse-a-Cath(TM) catheters, which include the Company's patented
Bayonet(TM) locking system on certain models.

26
<PAGE> 28

BACKGROUND

The vascular access product market is comprised of six major categories of
vascular access products: vascular access ports, dialysis catheters, central
venous catheters, critical care catheters, intravenous grafts and peripheral and
mid-line inserted catheters. The Company believes that there is presently no
medical supply company offering vascular access products from each of these six
product categories. The vascular access product industry is highly fragmented
and is comprised of several larger medical supply companies with diversified
product lines which include certain vascular access products and a number of
smaller niche manufacturers offering a single or limited number of vascular
access products. In recent years, as medical supply companies have continued to
evaluate their ability to operate their vascular access product divisions
efficiently and focus on their core businesses, there have been divestitures by
such companies of their vascular access product divisions. In addition, certain
small manufacturers of specialty medical devices have encountered difficulty in
developing sufficient distribution or marketing channels for their products
because of their size and limited product line and have sought to combine with
larger vascular access product companies.

The Company currently manufactures and markets products in three vascular
access product categories: vascular access ports, dialysis catheters and central
venous catheters.

THE MARKET FOR VASCULAR ACCESS PORTS. Vascular access ports are
implantable devices utilized for the central venous administration of a variety
of medical therapies, including chemotherapy, infusion of fluids and nutrients
and administration of drugs and blood products. Vascular access ports are also
used for blood sampling for diagnostic purposes. Access to the central vascular
system has become an essential element in the treatment of many critically ill
patients, particularly those with various forms of cancer. Central venous access
facilitates a more systemic delivery of treatment agents, while mitigating
certain of the harsh side effects of chemotherapy protocols and eliminating the
need for repeated access to peripheral veins. A central venous catheter can be
accessed either through a port that is implanted in a patient's subcutaneous
tissue beneath the clavicle, or through an external catheter which extends
several inches outside the patient's body. Once implanted in a patient's body, a
port can be utilized for up to approximately 2,000 accesses. Ports have become
the preferred method of central vascular access for both physicians and patients
because the use of ports generally results in (i) lower infection rates, (ii)
less interference with patients' day-to-day activities, since ports do not
extend outside the body, are visually undetectable, can remain in place for
extended periods and do not require the frequent extension line flushing and
dressing changes required for external catheters and (iii) lower overall cost.
For these reasons, domestic sales of vascular access ports have increased
significantly in recent years, from approximately $52.0 million in 1991 to an
estimated $92.0 million in 1997.

The Company believes that the worldwide market for vascular access ports
will continue to grow significantly primarily due to the increased utilization
of chemotherapy protocols. The utilization of these protocols is being driven
primarily by (i) aging population demographics and the higher incidence of
cancer among persons 60 years of age and older relative to other age groups and
(ii) the increasing patient population for whom chemotherapy has become an
appropriate treatment protocol due to earlier detection and intervention and the
increased efficacy of chemotherapy treatments.

THE MARKET FOR HEMODIALYSIS CATHETERS. Hemodialysis catheters are used in
the treatment of patients suffering from renal failure who are required to
undergo short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic) hemodialysis, a process
involving the removal of waste products from the blood by passing a patient's
blood through a dialysis machine. Both short-term and long-term hemodialysis
treatments require vascular access. Patients requiring short-term hemodialysis
may receive an acute catheter placed in a central vein. When hemodialysis
procedures are required on a long-term basis, synthetic grafts are often
surgically implanted into the patient's arm to provide a more permanent access
point. Such graft procedures generally require four to ten weeks to heal, during
which time the hemodialysis patient continues to require the use of a catheter
for treatment. In addition, certain patients are unable to tolerate the surgery
required to implant the graft or have had repeated graft procedures and no
longer are suitable graft candidates and, therefore, must utilize hemodialysis
catheters for their treatment.

A typical hemodialysis treatment lasts three to four hours and is
administered three times per week. The efficiency of a dialysis procedure is
measured by the amount of urea which is removed from the patient's blood
27
<PAGE> 29

stream during the treatment. Because hemodialysis treatment is burdensome to the
patient and often covered by third-party payors on a fixed-fee basis, the
ability to complete a hemodialysis procedure quickly and efficiently is
important to both patients and clinicians. The time required to complete a
treatment and the efficiency of such treatment is affected by the rate at which
blood may be continuously withdrawn from the patient, circulated through a
hemodialysis filter and reintroduced into the patient, with these processes
affected by the flow rate of the patient's catheter.

According to United States government sources, the number of patients
requiring chronic hemodialysis services in the United States increased from
171,000 patients in 1993 to over 200,000 patients in 1995. Industry sources
project that the worldwide market for hemodialysis catheters will grow at an
annual rate of approximately 8.5% to over $135 million in sales in 2000. Growth
in the number of hemodialysis patients is expected to result primarily from (i)
the aging of the general population, (ii) the increased effectiveness of
treatments for and higher survival rates of patients suffering from
hypertension, diabetes and other illnesses which lead to renal failure and (iii)
increasingly efficient hemodialysis procedures which have enabled older patients
and others that previously could not tolerate hemodialysis to benefit from this
treatment.

THE MARKET FOR APHERESIS CATHETERS. Stem cell apheresis is a
newly-developed protocol for treating certain forms of mid- and late-stage
cancers, particularly breast cancer. The typical apheresis procedure involves
the insertion of multiple catheters into the patient through which (i) blood is
withdrawn from the patient, cycled through an apheresis machine in which stem
cells (cells which perform a key role in the body's immune system) are removed
from the blood and the blood is then reinfused into the patient, (ii)
chemotherapy agents, as well as antibiotics and blood products, are administered
to the patient over extended periods of time and (iii) the previously removed
stem cells are subsequently reintroduced into the patient. Such procedures
historically have required the use of multiple catheters, multiple surgical
procedures and extensive treatment duration.

In 1990, approximately 6,000 stem cell apheresis procedures were performed
worldwide, with this protocol generally being considered an experimental
procedure (and therefore not covered by most health insurers). Management
estimates that by 1995 stem cell apheresis grew to approximately 18,000
procedures. The Company believes that such procedures will continue to
experience significant growth primarily from increasing awareness and acceptance
of apheresis as part of the treatment protocol for various cancers and
improvements in apheresis procedures and as apheresis procedures increasingly
become reimbursable by third-party payors as a treatment for many cancers.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

- Focus on the Vascular Access Market. The Company has developed a
highly-specialized sales force that focuses on addressing the needs of
vascular surgeons and other physicians and clinicians who utilize vascular
access products in providing medical treatments. Management believes its
sales force is the largest direct sales force focused exclusively on
vascular access products and that it offers the Company's customers the
broadest available lines in each of the Company's three major categories
of products -- vascular access ports, hemodialysis catheters and stem cell
apheresis catheters. By offering broad product lines, including
proprietary products, the Company is able to take advantage of cross-
selling opportunities. The Company believes that its customers benefit
from its broad knowledge of vascular access products and procedures,
comprehensive customer support and responsiveness to their changing needs.

- Exploit Unique Products. The Company manufactures and markets certain
lines of products that utilize unique technologies which the Company
believes offer superior performance compared with competing products. With
a unique Circle C(R) design, the Company believes its dual lumen hemodial-

28
<PAGE> 30

ysis catheters provide the highest flow rates available in the market for
comparably sized catheters, yielding significant benefits for patients and
practitioners. In addition, the Company believes its proprietary
Pheres-Flow(TM) catheter is the only triple lumen catheter designed solely
for the purpose of stem cell apheresis procedures and has significantly
improved this newly-emerging protocol. The Company will seek to increase
its sales of these unique products and utilize cross-selling to increase
sales of its other product lines.

- Pursue Strategic Acquisitions/Partnerships. The Company has enhanced its
product lines through completion of the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition, in
October 1995, which gave the Company its first line of catheters, and the
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition, in July 1997, which significantly
expanded the Company's line of vascular access ports. The Company believes
that the vascular access products industry remains highly fragmented.
Accordingly, the Company believes that there will be attractive strategic
partnering and acquisition opportunities. The Company will seek to acquire
products that: (i) will broaden its lines of vascular access products or
increase its penetration of existing markets; (ii) can be effectively
marketed by its sales organization; and (iii) can be manufactured at the
Company's recently expanded manufacturing facility.

- Increase Efficiency of Manufacturing Operations. In 1996, the Company
opened a 20,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Manchester, Georgia.
The Company recently increased the size of the facility to 45,000 square
feet, and is currently manufacturing its Circle C(R) and Pheres-Flow(TM)
lines of catheters at this facility. In early 1998, the Company began
transitioning the manufacturing of all of its LifePort()(TM),
Infuse-a-Port(R) and Infuse-a-Cath(TM) product lines to this facility and
expects to complete this transition during the second quarter of 1998. The
Company expects to be able to manufacture all of its product lines at the
Manchester facility without incurring significant future personnel or
capital expenditures and believes that its manufacturing capacity and
space will be able to support substantial future growth. The Company
believes that it can achieve significant cost efficiencies through
transitioning the manufacturing of all its product lines to this facility
and that it will be able to leverage its manufacturing infrastructure by
adding newly acquired or developed vascular access products to its product
lines.

- Develop and Expand Distribution Capabilities. The Company plans to
continue to build upon the success of its sales organization by expanding
its marketing efforts internationally, by entering into group purchasing
contracts and by enhancing its direct sales force. In particular, the
Company plans to expand its relationships with international distributors,
a process which will be coordinated by the Company's newly hired director
of international sales. In 1997, approximately 17% of the Company's
revenues were generated from sales to end-users outside the United States,
and management believes there are significant opportunities to increase
its export sales. The Company will also seek to enter into additional
group purchasing contracts with national purchasing groups, which are
playing an increasingly significant role in the decisions of hospitals and
other health care organizations to purchase certain medical devices. In
connection with such efforts, the Company recently (i) entered into the
Premier Purchasing Agreement and a purchasing agreement with Amerinet, and
(ii) commenced an arrangement with Allegiance to include the Company's
products in the Allegiance purchasing agreement with UHC.

PRODUCTS

VASCULAR ACCESS PORTS

The Company manufactures and markets high quality, technologically
advanced, implantable vascular access ports and attached or attachable catheter
products intended to afford safe and simple vascular access and catheter
placement and greater patient convenience. The Company seeks to introduce new
products and to extend the applications of its existing products through
innovations in safety, effectiveness, ease of use and reliability in response to
the specific, unmet needs of vascular surgeons and other physicians and
clinicians.

The Company's lines of vascular access ports, which it believes are the
most comprehensive in the industry, consist of three distinct families: (i)
Triumph-1(R); (ii) LifePort(TM); and (iii) Infuse-a-Port(R). Through the sale
and distribution of these three product lines, the Company has become one of the
largest suppliers of

29
<PAGE> 31

vascular access ports in the United States, having an estimated 20% of the
domestic market for such products by the end of 1997.

TRIUMPH-1(R). The Triumph-1(R) family of vascular access ports was
developed and engineered by the Company in collaboration with CarboMedics, Inc.
and first marketed by the Company in September 1994. All Triumph-1(R) ports are
constructed from titanium or polysulfone with a factory-attached or attachable
silicone catheter system designed to ensure a safe transition into the vascular
system, while lowering the risk of a ruptured catheter. The Company tests each
Triumph-1(R) port and catheter system in its product line to a rigorous 100 psi
standard and the Company believes that Triumph-1(R) provides the highest
strength silicone catheter system in the market.

LIFEPORT(TM). LifePort(TM), is a family of titanium and plastic ports
acquired by the Company in the Strato(R)/ Infusaid(TM) Acquisition. The product
line is marketed with either a factory-attached or attachable catheter system,
with certain models utilizing the Company's patented Bayonet(TM) locking system.
The catheter of certain LifePort(TM) products is secured to the port upon
insertion into the patient by twisting the locking system into place and the
locking mechanism and port are then sutured into place. This Bayonet(TM) locking
system enhances the integrity of the port/catheter connection, substantially
eliminating the medical risks of possible disconnection.

INFUSE-A-PORT(R). The Infuse-a-Port(R) line is a family of ports
constructed with a polysulfone port body for durability and a self-sealing
silicone septum. Introduced into the market in the early 1980s, Infuse-a-Port(R)
products were the first implantable ports to enter the vascular access device
market and, due to their proven reliability, continue to enjoy significant
physician loyalty.

Each of the Triumph-1(R), LifePort(TM) and Infuse-a-Port(R) families of
vascular access ports is marketed with a diverse array of product selections to
accommodate the requirements and preferences of the surgeon inserting the port,
the physician treating the patient and the clinicians administering drugs and
monitoring the patient's condition, and to suit the patient's specific anatomy.
Dual port systems have two separate reservoirs connected to a dual lumen
catheter which allow the clinician to deliver non-compatible drugs
simultaneously or, in chemotherapy treatments, allow the clinician to deliver
two complementary drugs that cannot be mixed in an oxygenated environment. A
single chamber port accommodates patients without these specific needs. Petite
ports are designed to provide full-size performance in a small port for
pediatric or petite patients with very little subcutaneous tissue. The choice of
port materials can be dependent on the needs or anatomy of the patient or the
preference of the physician. Because of its diversity and durability, the
titanium port is currently the most commonly used of all ports available on the
market. However, ports made of polysulfone plastic have been experiencing
increased acceptance as a result of their lower per unit pricing.

SPECIALTY CATHETER PRODUCTS

CIRCLE C(R) HEMODIALYSIS CATHETERS. The Company's hemodialysis catheter
product lines consist of Circle C(R) acute and chronic catheters. The Company's
Circle C(R) design utilizes differentiated lumen sizes and a unique dividing
wall to support the catheter's chambers, which improves the resistance of the
catheter's chambers to negative pressure and collapse. Because of their Circle
C(R) design, the Company believes these catheters provide the highest flow rates
of comparably sized catheters, thus providing patients the most thorough
filtration treatment obtainable and clinicians administering dialysis treatments
increased productivity. The Company's Circle C(R) catheters are used for both
acute and chronic hemodialysis. The Company's Circle C(R) acute catheters are
made of polyurethane (a rigid material which is temperature sensitive and
softens once inserted in the patient's body) and can remain implanted in a
patient for up to 21 days. The Company's Circle C(R) chronic catheters are made
of silicone and can remain in a patient's body for as long as 18 months. The
Company manufactures its Circle C(R) acute and chronic catheters using an
injection molding process which provides a continuous, one-piece design that
helps to eliminate turbulence in blood flow, thereby providing additional gains
in flow rates.

PHERES-FLOW(TM) APHERESIS CATHETERS. The Company's proprietary
Pheres-Flow(TM) catheter is a central venous triple lumen silicone catheter that
was designed and developed by NeoStar Medical(R) and introduced by the Company
in 1996. The Pheres-Flow(TM) catheter is the only triple lumen catheter designed
exclusively for
30
<PAGE> 32

the purpose of apheresis/bone marrow transplant procedures. The Pheres-Flow(TM)
catheter has significantly improved the process utilized by clinicians in
performing stem cell apheresis procedures and has streamlined the surgical
procedure required to complete such protocols. The Pheres-Flow(TM) catheter can
be inserted in the apheresis/stem cell transplant patient and utilized for the
entire duration of the apheresis/stem cell protocol, including blood
removal/reinfusion, chemotherapy, nutritional therapy, antibiotics, medications,
and cell re-implantation. As a result, no further surgical procedures are
required after the initial placement of the catheter. This reduction in the
required surgical procedures greatly reduces the risk of infection for the
apheresis patient, which is crucial since the patient's ability to fight
infection is reduced through the removal of stem cells in the blood stream. The
triple lumen design also allows for multi-line simultaneous administration of
medications and the flexibility to use a single catheter, rather than multiple
catheters, thus, also providing less chance of infection during critical patient
treatment time. These factors also reduce the total costs of an apheresis
procedure.

INFUSE-A-CATH(TM) CATHETERS. Infuse-a-Cath(TM) catheters are a family of
external central venous catheters that are differentiated by their use of the
Bayonet(TM) locking system patented by the Company. The Bayonet(TM) locking
system is secured by a simple twist of the lock once the catheter is placed onto
its connection plug. The Bayonet(TM) locking system ensures the integrity of the
extension legs on the catheter and allows glue free repair, an easier repair
method than those applicable to competing products. These products are also
differentiated by being available in either silicone, which is widely used, or
polyurethane, which the Company believes is preferred by many physicians because
of its ease of insertion and durability.

OTHER CATHETERS. In addition, the Company markets and sells peritoneal,
continuous arterial venous hemophiltration, shunts and single lumen catheters,
all of which are used in connection with alternative methods in treating renal
failure patients.

SALES AND MARKETING

The Company utilizes a highly-specialized direct sales force which focuses
exclusively on vascular surgeons and other physicians and clinicians. This
direct sales force has been developed by the Company since its formation in
1990, is trained extensively regarding vascular access products and the
procedures and treatments in which they are utilized, and emphasizes a
"relationship first" approach in the marketing of the Company's products. The
Company markets and sells its product lines domestically through approximately
50 full-time direct sales and marketing employees and six distributors employing
approximately 70 sales representatives. The Company distributes its products
internationally exclusively through independent distributors, whose distribution
efforts will be coordinated and overseen, commencing April 1, 1998, by the
Company's recently-hired international sales manager based in Brussels, Belgium.
In 1997, the Company marketed and sold its product lines in 53 countries outside
the United States through approximately 50 distributors. The Company believes
that it derives significant competitive advantages from its sales and marketing
organization and that this organization will allow the Company to effectively
market a broader line of vascular access products and achieve greater
penetration in its existing product markets.

Within each hospital or other healthcare organization, the Company's
marketing efforts are directed to those physicians responsible for implanting
and utilizing ports and catheters, particularly vascular surgeons, general
surgeons, oncologists, nephrologists, interventional radiologists, nurses,
clinicians and other healthcare professionals. The Company believes that the
input of all of these healthcare professionals is critical to the decision of a
hospital or a healthcare organization to purchase a particular brand of vascular
access product. The Company's sales personnel develop ongoing relationships by
communicating regularly with vascular surgeons, and other physicians and
clinicians in the hospitals where the Company's products are sold, devoting
approximately 40% to 50% of their sales time to visiting hospital operating
rooms and dialysis wards. The Company also participates in trade shows,
advertises in trade journals, funds clinical studies of vascular access
products, administers continuing education programs and consults with clinical
advisory committees of physicians and nurses. The Company believes that its
"relationship first" approach provides significant benefits to its customers and
promotes customer loyalty.

31
<PAGE> 33

Hospital chains and large buying groups have played, and are expected to
continue to play, an increasingly significant role in the purchase of medical
devices. In recent years, these groups have sought to narrow their list of
suppliers. As a result, the Company has increased its focus on marketing its
products to these buying groups, while the Company's direct sales force
continues to call on physicians associated with these buying groups in order to
improve compliance with these group purchasing agreements and improve market
share, generally.

As a result of such efforts, in March 1998 the Company entered into the
Premier Purchasing Agreement with Premier, a national purchasing group that
includes over 1,700 owned, leased, managed and affiliated hospitals. Pursuant to
the Premier Purchasing Agreement, the Company will be an approved vendor for the
hospitals participating in Premier's purchasing program and will pay to Premier
an administrative fee equal to a specified percentage of the aggregate amount of
sales of the Company's products to such hospitals. The Company expects that
various categories of its products will become subject to the Premier Purchasing
Agreement over the next several months. In connection with the Premier
Purchasing Agreement, the Company and Premier also entered into a Warrant
Agreement pursuant to which the Company granted to Premier a warrant to acquire,
subject to certain conditions, up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock. See
"Description of Capital Stock -- Premier Warrant."

In addition, the Company has commenced an arrangement with Allegiance
pursuant to which the Company's products will be included in the Allegiance
purchasing agreement with UHC, a group of the nation's largest academic medical
centers. The Company will pay to UHC an administrative fee equal to a specified
percentage of the gross sales of the Company's products to UHC in connection
with this arrangement. UHC and VHA Inc. recently joined their supply chain
management operations into a new company -- Novation, LLC, one of the nation's
largest supply chain management organizations. The Company has also recently
entered into a three-year purchasing agreement with AmeriNet, one of the
nation's largest group purchasing organizations, pursuant to which the Company
is required to pay AmeriNet a specified percentage of all gross sales realized
under the agreement. The Company believes that the arrangement with Allegiance
and the purchasing agreement with AmeriNet will provide it with expanded
distribution channels for its products.

In 1997, 83.0% of the Company's net sales were derived from sales in the
United States. In the international market, sales have increased from $200,000,
or 4.2% of net sales, in 1995, to $2.7 million, or 17.0% of net sales, in 1997.
A significant portion of the Company's 1997 international sales were derived
from sales of the products acquired in the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition,
and this acquisition significantly increased the size of the Company's network
of international distributors.

RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

The Company is engaged in limited ongoing research and development
activities. The principal focus of the Company's research and development effort
is to identify and analyze the needs of vascular surgeons, physicians and
clinicians, and to develop products that address these needs. The Company views
proposals from physicians and other healthcare professionals as an important
source of potential research and development projects. The Company believes that
those end-users are often in the best position to conceive of new products and
to recommend ways to improve the performance of existing products. Many of the
Company's product improvements have resulted from collaborative efforts with
physicians and other healthcare professionals or other medical device
manufacturers.

In 1995, 1996 and 1997, research and development expenses accounted for
$65,800 (1.3% of net sales), $58,700 (0.8% of net sales), and $7,000 (0.04% of
net sales), respectively. Such amounts were used primarily to improve existing
products and implement new technology to produce these products.

MANUFACTURING

The Company manufactures and packages substantially all of its specialty
catheter products at its 45,000 square foot manufacturing facility in
Manchester, Georgia, which it opened in August 1996. The Company currently
manufactures its LifePort(TM) and Infuse-a-Port(R) vascular access port product
lines and its Infuse-a-
32
<PAGE> 34

Cath(TM) specialty catheter product line in 20,000 square feet of manufacturing
space at a 55,000 square foot ISO 9001 production facility located in Norwood,
Massachusetts. The Company has the right to use the Norwood space until April
15, 1998. The Company is presently transitioning its Norwood operations to the
Manchester facility and expects to complete this transition during the second
quarter of 1998. The Company is currently building inventory in anticipation of
this transition. In addition, the Company contracts with a third party for the
manufacture of certain portions of its Triumph-1(R) vascular access port product
line and plans to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

The Company believes that its manufacturing capacity at the Manchester
facility will be sufficient to support significant future production and growth.
The Company has applied for certification as an ISO 9001 medical device
manufacturer for the Manchester, Georgia facility and a CE Mark for its product
lines and expects to receive such certification and CE Mark by June 1998. See
"Business -- Government Regulation."

The Company's manufacturing processes consist primarily of the assembly of
standard and custom component parts, the injection molding of polyurethane or
silicone used in its Circle C(R) and Pheres-Flow(TM) lines of catheters and the
testing of completed products. The Company has arrangements with various
suppliers to provide it with the quantity of component parts necessary to
assemble its products. Almost all of the components and materials used in its
injection molding process are available from a number of different suppliers,
although certain components are purchased from a limited number of sources. The
Company believes that there are alternative and satisfactory sources for
limited-sourced components, although a sudden disruption in supply from one of
these suppliers could adversely affect the Company's ability to deliver its
product in a timely manner.

The Company devotes significant attention to quality control. Its quality
control measures begin at the manufacturing level where components are molded
and assembled in an "environmentally controlled area" designed and maintained to
reduce product exposure to particulate matter. Products are tested throughout
the manufacturing process for adherence to specifications.

Skills of assembly workers required for the manufacture of medical products
are similar to those required in typical assembly operations. The Company
believes that workers with these skills are readily available in the Manchester
and Norwood areas. See "Risk Factors -- Limited Manufacturing Experience."

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

The Company believes that patents and other proprietary rights are
important to its business. The Company also relies upon trade secrets,
"know-how," continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to
develop and maintain its competitive position.

The Company currently owns numerous United States patents and patent
applications, as well as numerous foreign patents and patent applications, which
relate to aspects of the technology used in certain of the Company's products,
including the LifePort(TM) family of vascular access ports, the
Infuse-a-Cath(TM) family of hemodialysis catheters and the Bayonet(TM) locking
system used in the LifePort(TM) family of products and in the Infuse-a-Cath(TM)
family of products. The Company also is a party to several license agreements
with third parties pursuant to which it has obtained, for varying terms, the
right to make, use and/or sell products that are covered under such license
agreements in consideration for royalty payments. Many of the Company's major
products, including its Circle C(R) acute and chronic catheters and its
Infuse-a-Cath(TM) catheters are subject to such license agreements. There can be
no assurance that the Company or its licensors have or will develop or obtain
additional rights to products or processes that are patentable, that patents
will issue from any of the pending patent applications filed by the Company or
that claims allowed will be sufficient to protect any technology that is
licensed to the Company. In addition, no assurances can be given that any
patents issued or licensed to the Company or other licensing arrangements will
not be challenged, invalidated, infringed or circumvented or that the rights
granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages for the Company's
business or products. In such event the business, results of operations and
financial condition of the Company could be materially adversely effected.

33
<PAGE> 35

There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other
intellectual property rights in the medical devices industry. Although the
Company has not been a party to any material litigation to enforce intellectual
property rights held by the Company, or a party to any material litigation
seeking to enforce rights alleged to be held by others, future litigation may be
necessary to protect patents, trade secrets or "know-how" owned by the Company
or to defend the Company against claimed infringement of the rights of others
and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of the Company
and others. The validity and breadth of claims covered in medical technology
patents involve complex legal and factual questions. Any such litigation could
result in substantial cost to and diversion of effort by the Company. Adverse
determinations in any such litigation could subject the Company to significant
liabilities to third parties, could require the Company to seek licenses from
third parties and could prevent the Company from manufacturing, selling or using
certain of its products, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
the business, results of operation and financial condition of the Company.
Accordingly, the Company may, in the future, be subject to legal actions
involving patent and other intellectual property claims.

The Company also relies upon trade secrets and proprietary technology for
protection of its confidential and proprietary information. There can be no
assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent
proprietary information or techniques or that third parties will not otherwise
gain access to the Company's trade secrets or disclose such technology.

The Company also relies upon trademarks and trade names for the development
and protection of brand loyalty and associated goodwill in connection with its
products. The Company's policy is to protect its trademarks, trade names and
associated goodwill by, among other methods, filing United States and foreign
trademark applications relating to its products and business. The Company owns
numerous United States and foreign trademark registrations and applications. The
Company also relies upon trademarks and trade names for which it does not have
pending trademark applications or existing registrations, but in which the
Company has substantial trademark rights. The Company's registered and
unregistered trademark rights relate to the majority of the Company's products,
including the Circle C(R), Infuse-a-Port(R), Triumph-1(R), Infuse-a-Cath(TM),
LifePort(TM) and Pheres-Flow(TM)product lines. There can be no assurance that
any registered or unregistered trademarks or trade names of the Company will not
be challenged, canceled, infringed or circumvented, or be declared generic, or
be declared infringing on other third-party marks, or provide any competitive
advantage of the Company.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

As a manufacturer of medical devices, the Company is subject to regulation
by, among other governmental entities, the FDA and the corresponding agencies of
the states and foreign countries in which the Company sells its products. These
regulations govern the introduction of new medical devices, the observance of
certain standards with respect to the manufacture, testing and labeling of such
devices, the maintenance of certain records, the tracking of devices, and other
matters. These regulations may have a material impact on the Company. Recently,
the FDA has pursued a more rigorous enforcement program to ensure that regulated
businesses, like the Company's, comply with applicable laws and regulations. The
Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with such governmental
regulations.

All medical devices introduced to the United States market since 1976,
which includes all of the Company's products, are required to be covered by a
premarket notification clearance pursuant to Section 510(k) of the FDC Act or an
approved PMA. Obtaining approval of a PMA can take up to several years or more
and involve preclinical studies and clinical testing. In contrast, the process
of obtaining a 510(k) clearance typically requires the submission of
substantially less data and generally involves a shorter review period, although
obtaining a 510(k) clearance may involve the submission of a substantial volume
of data, including clinical data, and may require a substantial review period. A
510(k) premarket notification clearance indicates that the FDA agrees with an
applicant's determination that the product for which clearance has been sought
is substantially equivalent to another medical device that has been previously
marketed but does not indicate that the product is safe and effective and does
not require a PMA. An approved PMA indicates that the FDA has approved as safe
and effective a product to be marketed for the uses described in the approved
labeling.
34
<PAGE> 36

In addition to requiring clearance or approval for new products, the FDA
may require clearance or approval prior to marketing products that are
modifications of existing products. The FDC Act provides that new 510(k)
clearances are required when, among other things, there is a major change or
modification in the intended use of the device or a change or modification to a
legally marketed device that could significantly affect its safety or
effectiveness. A manufacturer is expected to make the initial determination as
to whether a proposed change to a cleared device or to its intended use is of a
kind that would necessitate the filing of a new 510(k) notification. The Company
has made certain modifications to its cleared devices for which it has
determined that new 510(k) clearances are not required. There can be no
assurance, however, that the FDA would concur with the Company's conclusion that
a particular change does not necessitate a new 510(k) application. If the FDA
were to investigate and disagree with the Company's determinations and conclude
that one or more implemented changes requires a new 510(k), the FDA could take
regulatory actions such as issuance of a warning letter or requiring that the
Company cease marketing affected devices until new 510(k) notifications are
cleared.

In order to conduct clinical trials of an uncleared or unapproved device,
companies generally are required to comply with Investigational Device
Exemptions regulations ("IDE regulations"). The IDE regulations generally
require FDA approval before clinical study may begin. Devices subject to the IDE
regulations are subject to various restrictions imposed by the FDA. The number
of patients that may be treated with the device is limited, as is the number of
institutions at which the device may be used. Patients must give informed
consent to be treated with an investigational device. The institutional review
board of each institution where a study is being conducted must also approve the
clinical study. The device may not be advertised or otherwise promoted.
Unexpected adverse experiences must be reported to the FDA. The company
sponsoring the investigation must ensure that the investigation is being
conducted in accordance with the IDE regulations.

To date, the Company's products have received FDA marketing clearances only
through the 510(k) process. Certain future product applications, however, could
require approval through the PMA process. In addition, future products may
require approval of an IDE. There can be no assurance that all necessary 510(k)
clearances or PMA or IDE approvals will be granted on a timely basis or at all.
The FDA review process may delay the Company's product introductions in the
future. It is possible that delays in receipt of or failure to receive any
necessary clearance or approval could have a material adverse effect on the
Company.

The Company is also required to register with the FDA as a device
manufacturer and to comply with the FDA's GMP regulations. These regulations
require that the Company manufacture its products and maintain its records in a
prescribed manner with respect to manufacturing, testing and control activities.
Further, the Company is required to comply with FDA requirements for labeling
and promotion of its products. For example, the FDA prohibits cleared or
approved devices from being marketed for uncleared or unapproved uses. The
medical device reporting regulation requires that the Company provide
information to the FDA whenever there is evidence to reasonably suggest that one
of its devices may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or
that there has occurred a malfunction that would be likely to cause or
contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. The
Company intends to transfer completely its manufacturing from Norwood,
Massachusetts to Manchester, Georgia in the second quarter of 1998. As a result
of this transfer, the Manchester facility will be subject to a GMP inspection by
the FDA. The Company cannot predict at this time what impact, if any, this
inspection will have on its business.

Medical device manufacturers are generally subject to periodic inspections
by the FDA. If the FDA believes that a company is not in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, it can, among other things, institute
proceedings to issue a warning letter apprising of violative conduct, detain or
seize products, issue a recall, enjoin future violations and assess civil and
criminal penalties against the company, its officers or its employees. In
addition, clearances or approvals could be withdrawn in appropriate
circumstances. Failure to comply with regulatory requirements or any adverse
regulatory action could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

events that may be associated with its devices as required by the agency's MDR
regulations. In response to this warning letter, the Company revised its MDR
procedure and submitted it with other corrective actions for review by the FDA.
The FDA responded that the corrective actions described by the Company appeared
to adequately address the agency's concerns. At the conclusion of a follow-up
inspection in 1997, the Company was advised of various inspectional observations
including its alleged failure to submit MDRs on 19 reportable events. The
Company responded to the inspectional observations in writing and at a meeting
with the FDA at the Atlanta District Office at which the interpretation of the
MDR regulations was discussed. The District submitted the question of the
interpretation of the regulations to FDA headquarters in Washington, D.C. On
March 10, 1998, the Company received a warning letter from the Atlanta District
Office reasserting its interpretation of the MDR regulations and alleging the
Company's failure to report 15 reportable events and violation of two current
GMP requirements. The Company has responded to the warning letter pledging to
submit all substantive reports until it secures exemptions from the agency on
the submission of certain classes of reports and describing corrective action
taken on the alleged current GMP violations. The Company believes that it has
implemented corrective actions that achieve substantial compliance with FDA
requirements, but there can be no assurance that an FDA enforcement action will
not ensue at a future time or will not materially adversely affect the Company's
business, results of operations and financial condition.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1320a-76(b) (the "Anti-Kickback Statute"),
the knowing and willful offer or receipt of any remuneration, directly or
indirectly, in cash or in kind, in exchange for or which is intended to induce
the purchase, lease or order of any good, facility, item or service for which
payment may be made in whole or in part under a federal healthcare program,
including Medicare and Medicaid, is prohibited. A violation of the Anti-Kickback
Statute is a felony, punishable by fine, imprisonment or exclusion from the
Medicare and Medicaid programs. Certain regulations promulgated under the
Anti-Kickback Statute (i.e., 42 C.F.R. Section 1001.952(j)) provide that
prohibited remuneration under the Anti-Kickback Statute does not include any
payment by a vendor of goods to a group purchasing organization if certain
standards are met. The Company believes that the group purchasing organizations
with which it has purchasing agreements comply in all material respects with
such standards. See "-- Sales and Marketing."

Medical device laws and regulations are also in effect in many of the
countries in which the Company does business outside the United States. These
range from comprehensive device approval requirements for some or all of the
Company's medical device products to simple requests for product data or
certifications. The number and scope of these requirements are increasing.
Medical device laws and regulations are also in effect in many of the states in
which the Company does business. State and foreign medical device laws and
regulations may have a material impact on the Company. In addition,
international sales of certain medical devices manufactured in the United States
but not approved by the FDA for distribution in the United States are subject to
FDA export requirements, which require the Company to obtain documentation from
the medical device regulatory authority of such country stating that the sale of
the device is not in violation of that country's medical device laws. This
documentation is then submitted to the FDA with a request for a permit for
export to that country.

Federal, state and foreign laws and regulations regarding the manufacture
and sale of medical devices are subject to future changes. For example, Congress
recently enacted the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997,
which included several significant amendments to the prior law governing medical
devices. Additionally, the FDA has recently made significant changes to its GMP
regulations and may make changes to other regulations as well. The Company
cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes might have on its business;
however, such changes could have a material impact on the Company. See "Risk
Factors -- Government Regulation."

HEALTHCARE REFORM; THIRD-PARTY REIMBURSEMENT

In recent years, several comprehensive healthcare reform proposals were
introduced in the United States Congress. The intent of the proposals was,
generally, to expand healthcare coverage for the uninsured and reduce the growth
of total healthcare expenditures. While none of the proposals were adopted,
healthcare reform may again be addressed by the current United States Congress.
Certain states have made significant changes to their Medicaid programs and have
adopted various measures to expand coverage and limit costs.
36
<PAGE> 38

Implementation of government healthcare reform and other efforts to control
costs may limit the price of, or the level at which reimbursement is provided
for, the Company's products. In addition, healthcare reform may accelerate the
growing trend toward involvement by hospital administrators, purchasing managers
and buying groups in purchasing decisions. This trend would likely include
increased emphasis on the cost-effectiveness of any treatment regimen. These
changes may also cause the marketplace in general to place increased emphasis on
the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures and the delivery of
more cost-effective medical therapies. Regardless of which additional reform
proposals, if any, are ultimately adopted, the trend toward cost controls and
the requirements of more efficient utilization of medical therapies and
procedures will continue and accelerate. The Company is unable at this time to
predict whether any such additional healthcare initiatives will be enacted, the
final form such reforms will take or when such reforms would be implemented. See
"Risk Factors -- Healthcare Reform/Pricing Pressure."

The Company's products are purchased principally by hospitals, hospital
networks and hospital buying groups. During the past several years, the major
third-party payors of hospital services (Medicare, Medicaid, private healthcare
indemnity insurance and managed care plans) have substantially revised their
payment methodologies to contain healthcare costs. These cost pressures are
leading to increased emphasis on the price and cost-effectiveness of any
treatment regimen and medical device. In addition, third-party payors, such as
governmental programs, private indemnity insurance and managed care plans which
are billed by hospitals for such healthcare services, are increasingly
negotiating the prices charged for medical products and services and may deny
reimbursement if they determine that a device was not used in accordance with
cost-effective treatment methods as determined by the payor, was experimental or
was used for an unapproved indication. There can be no assurance that in the
future, hospital purchasing decisions or third party reimbursement levels will
not adversely affect the profitability of the Company's products.

COMPETITION

The markets for the Company's product lines are highly competitive. The
Company faces substantial competition from a number of other manufacturers and
suppliers of vascular access ports, dialysis and apheresis catheters and related
ancillary products, including companies with more extensive research and
manufacturing capabilities and greater technical, financial and other resources.
In response to increased concerns about the rising costs of healthcare, United
States hospitals and physicians are placing increasing emphasis on
cost-effectiveness in the selection of products to perform medical procedures.
The Company believes that its products compete primarily on the basis of: (i)
product design, development and improvement; (ii) customer support; (iii) brand
loyalty; and (iv) price. The Company believes that Bard Access Systems, a
division of C.R. Bard, Inc., is the only company which competes with the Company
in each of the Company's product categories. See "Risk Factors -- Competition."

PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS AND INSURANCE

The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices of the types
produced by the Company entail an inherent risk of product liability. The
Company's products are often used in intensive care settings with seriously ill
patients. While the Company believes that it maintains an adequate amount of
product liability insurance, there can be no assurance that the amount of such
insurance will be sufficient to satisfy claims made against the Company in the
future or that the Company will be able to obtain insurance in the future at
satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts. Product liability claims or product
recalls could result in costly litigation and could have a material adverse
effect on the business, results of operation and financial condition of the
Company. In addition, the Company is required under certain of its licensing
agreements to indemnify its licensors against certain product liability claims
by third parties. See "Risk Factors -- Potential Product Liability."

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. In the course of its
business, the Company is involved in the handling, storage and disposal of
materials which are classified as hazardous. The Company believes that its
operations comply in all
37
<PAGE> 39

material respects with applicable environmental laws and regulations. While the
Company continues to make capital and operational expenditures for protection of
the environment, it does not anticipate that those expenditures will have a
material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of
operations.

BACKLOG

Delivery lead times for the Company's products are very short at times and,
consequently, the Company routinely maintains an immaterial amount of order
backlog which is generally filled within 60 days of the order date. Management
currently believes that its backlog is not a reliable indicator of future
financial or operating performance. If, however, the Company does not receive
ISO 9001 certification and a CE Mark for products manufactured at the Manchester
facility by June 1998, then the Company may not be able to fill European orders
and could experience substantial backlog, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Company.

PROPERTIES

The Company's principal executive and administrative offices and research
and manufacturing center is located in Manchester, Georgia in a 45,000 square
foot facility. The Company leases the Manchester facility and the 10.5 acre lot
on which it is located from The Development Authority of the City of Manchester
(the "Manchester Development Authority") pursuant to operating leases which
expire in 2009 and 2010 (collectively, the "Manchester Leases") and under which
the Company pays monthly lease payments of approximately $9,500 in the
aggregate. The Company has an option to extend each of the Manchester Leases for
an additional five-year term and to purchase the facility and/or the adjacent
lot containing approximately nine acres. The Company considers the Manchester
facility to be in good condition and adequate to meet the present and reasonably
foreseeable needs of the Company.

The Company manufactures a portion of the acquired Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)
product line (LifePort(TM), Infuse-a-Port(R) and Infuse-a-Cath(TM)) in
approximately 20,000 square feet of space at a 55,000 square foot production
facility in Norwood, Massachusetts. The Company currently occupies the Norwood
facility under an agreement which gives the Company the right to use such space
until April 15, 1998. Management plans to transition all of the manufacturing of
the acquired Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) product line to the Manchester, Georgia
facility in the second quarter of 1998.

The Company also maintains certain administrative offices in a 3,300 square
foot floor of an office condominium located in Atlanta, Georgia (the "Atlanta
Office"). See "Certain Transactions -- Agreements with CMI."

EMPLOYEES

At January 31, 1998, the Company had approximately 100 full-time employees,
none of which are represented by a union. The Company maintains compensation,
benefit, equity participation and work environment policies intended to assist
in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. The Company believes that the
success of its business will depend, in significant part, on its ability to
attract and retain such personnel. The Company has never experienced an
organized work stoppage or strike and considers its relations with its employees
to be good.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND INSURANCE

The Company is from time to time a party to litigation arising in the
ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that it is not currently
involved in any litigation that will have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition or results of operation.

The Company maintains insurance in such amounts and against such risks as
it deems prudent, although no assurance can be given that such insurance will be
sufficient under all circumstances to protect the Company against significant
claims for damages. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured
against could materially and adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations. Moreover, no assurance can be given that
the Company will be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at
commercially reasonable rates or on acceptable terms.
38
<PAGE> 40

MANAGEMENT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS AND KEY EMPLOYEES

The following table sets forth certain information concerning each of the
executive officers, directors and key employees of the Company as of March 23,
1998.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS: AGE POSITION
- --------------------------------- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Marshall B. Hunt.......................... 42 Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
Roy C. Mallady, Jr........................ 53 Director and Vice Chairman of the Board*
William E. Peterson, Jr................... 42 Director and President
J. Ronald Hager........................... 54 Vice President of Operations
Mark A. Jewett............................ 32 Vice President of Finance
L. Bruce Maloy............................ 34 Vice President of Administration
Charles E. Adair.......................... 50 Director
Robert Cohen.............................. 40 Director
Robert J. Simmons......................... 55 Director
Gordon Tunstall........................... 54 Director
KEY EMPLOYEES:
Michael A. Crouch......................... 35 National Accounts Manager
Frank D. DeBartola........................ 34 Director of Marketing
Robert R. Singer.......................... 32 National Sales Manager
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Mr. Mallady will resign from the Board of Directors and as Vice Chairman of
the Board of the Company effective upon consummation of the Offering.

Marshall B. Hunt is a co-founder of the Company and has served as a
director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its inception in 1990.
Mr. Hunt has served as the Chairman of the Board of the Company since 1997.
Prior to co-founding the Company, Mr. Hunt co-founded Cardiac Medical, Inc.
("CMI"), a distributor of cardiac pacemakers, in 1987, and served as its Chief
Executive Officer until October 1997. Mr. Hunt currently serves as Secretary of
CMI. In 1981, Mr. Hunt founded Hunt Medical Systems, Inc., a distributor of
pacemaker products, and served as its President from 1981 to 1987. From 1979
through 1981, Mr. Hunt held various sales and management positions with American
Hospital Supply Corporation.

Roy C. Mallady, Jr. is a co-founder of the Company and has served as a
director and Vice Chairman of the Board since 1997. Mr. Mallady served as
Chairman of the Board of the Company and a director of the Company from its
inception to 1997. Prior to co-founding the Company, Mr. Mallady co-founded CMI
in 1987 and served as its President until October 1997. He currently serves as
CMI's President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mallady has served as a
consultant to Sulzer Intermedics, a medical technology company, since October
1997.

William E. Peterson, Jr. is a co-founder of the Company and has served as
President of the Company since its inception in 1990. Mr. Peterson joined the
Company's Board of Directors in January 1998. Mr. Peterson served as Vice
President of Finance of CMI from 1987 to 1997. From 1981 through 1987, he served
as a financial officer of Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corporation, a
manufacturer of synthetic rubber. From 1978 to 1981, Mr. Peterson held various
positions with the public accounting firm of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., rising to
the position of Audit Senior. Mr. Peterson is a Certified Public Accountant.

J. Ronald Hager joined the Company as Vice President of Operations in July
1997 in connection with the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition. From 1992 to
1997, Mr. Hager held various management positions with
39
<PAGE> 41

Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM), including Vice President of Quality and Regulatory
Affairs in 1992, Executive Vice President -- Operations in 1993 and General
Manager from 1993 to 1997. Prior to joining Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM), Mr. Hager
was employed for 17 years with Abbott Laboratories in various management
positions, including Group V.P., Group Director and Regulatory Director.

Mark A. Jewett joined the Company as Vice President of Finance in December
1997. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Jewett served as Director of Finance for
ProMedCo Management Company, a physician management company, from 1996 to 1997.
From 1995 to 1996, he served as the Controller for Alliance Medical Practices, a
physician management company. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Jewett held various
accounting management positions with HealthInfusion, Inc., an alternate site
healthcare company, and Coram Healthcare, Inc., an alternate site healthcare
company that was formed by the merger of HealthInfusion and three other
publicly-owned companies. From 1989 to 1992, he held various positions, most
recently as a senior accountant, for the public accounting firm of Arthur
Andersen L.L.P. Mr. Jewett is a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified
Internal Auditor.

L. Bruce Maloy joined the Company in 1990 in its sales and marketing
department and has served as the Vice President of Administration of the Company
since 1996. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Maloy served as a Sales Manager of
Ryder, Inc., a transportation company, from 1989 to 1990 and a Key Account
Manager of Noxell Corporation, a subsidiary of The Proctor & Gamble Company,
from 1987 to 1989.

Charles E. Adair joined the Company's Board of Directors in January 1998.
From 1993 until present, Mr. Adair has been a principal of Cordova Capital II,
Inc. ("Cordova"), and Kowaliga Capital, Inc. ("Kowaliga") venture capital and
fund management companies, where he serves as manager of venture capital funds.
Cordova and Kowaliga are the general partners of Cordova Capital Partners,
L.P. -- Enhanced Appreciation ("Cordova -- Enhanced Appreciation"), a venture
capital fund and shareholder of the Company. Mr. Adair was associated with
Durr-Fillauer Medical, Inc., a pharmaceutical and medical products distribution
company, where he served in various capacities, including President and Chief
Operating Officer from 1981 to 1992. Mr. Adair currently serves on the Board of
Directors of Performance Food Group Company, a food distributor, and Tech Data
Corporation, a personal computer products distributor. Mr. Adair also serves on
the Boards of Directors of numerous privately-held companies associated with
Cordova's venture capital fund investments. Mr. Adair is a Certified Public
Accountant.

Robert Cohen joined the Company's Board of Directors in January 1998. Since
1992, Mr. Cohen has served as Group Vice President of Sulzer Medica Ltd., a
medical technology company serving the orthopedic and cardiovascular markets.
Mr. Cohen is engaged in the areas of mergers and acquisitions, corporate
accounts, business development, corporate marketing and strategic planning.
Prior to joining Sulzer Medica, Mr. Cohen served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of GCI Medical, a medical device venture capital and
management organization during 1992, and held a variety of positions at Pfizer
Inc. and the Pfizer Hospital Products Group from 1981 to 1991.

Robert J. Simmons joined the Company's Board of Directors in January 1998.
Since 1995, Mr. Simmons has served as a director and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Healthcare Alliance, Inc. ("Healthcare Alliance"), a
consortium of healthcare manufacturers, and since 1990 he has been a director
and President of RJS Healthcare, Inc., a healthcare consulting company. Mr.
Simmons is also a director and Chairman of Healthcare Logistics, a company
focused on supply chain initiatives, founded in 1996. From 1985 to 1990, Mr.
Simmons served as a director and Executive Vice President of Baxter
International, Inc. Before joining Baxter International, Mr. Simmons held
various positions at American Hospital Supply Corporation. Mr. Simmons presently
serves as a director of American Health Products and serves on Lake Forest
Hospital's Board of Directors. Mr. Simmons has served on the hospital Boards of
Directors of Ancilla Systems, Inc., the Evanston Hospital Corporation and
Wheaton Franciscan Services, Inc. See "Certain Transactions -- Consulting
Agreement with Healthcare Alliance."

Gordon Tunstall joined the Company's Board of Directors in January 1998.
Mr. Tunstall is the founder of and has served, since 1970, as President of
Tunstall Consulting, Inc., a provider of strategic consulting and financial
planning services. Mr. Tunstall is also currently a director of Romac
International, Inc., a professional and technical placement firm, Orthodontic
Centers of America, Inc., a manager of orthodontic
40
<PAGE> 42

practices, Discount Auto Parts, Inc., a retail chain of automotive aftermarket
parts stores, and Advanced Lighting Technologies, Inc., a specialty lighting
manufacturer.

Michael A. Crouch joined the Company in 1992 as a sales representative in
Dallas, Texas. Mr. Crouch has served as National Accounts Manager of the Company
since 1997. From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Crouch served as a sales representative for
renal dialysis equipment and supplies for Cobe Renal Care, a renal device
company.

Frank D. DeBartola has served as Director of Marketing of the Company since
1996. Mr. DeBartola joined the Company in 1991 as a sales representative and
thereafter held various management positions with the Company, including Sales
Manager and Product Manager for the Circle C(R) and Pheres-Flow(TM) lines of
catheters.

Robert R. Singer joined the Company in 1990. Prior to assuming his current
position as National Sales Manager in 1996, Mr. Singer served in the Company's
sales and marketing department as a sales representative from 1990 to 1993 and
Regional Sales Manager from 1993 to 1996.

Pursuant to the Company's Articles and Bylaws, the Board of Directors of
the Company is divided into three classes, with each director serving a
three-year term (after the initial term). The directors of Class I, Messrs.
Mallady and Adair, hold office until the first scheduled annual meeting of
shareholders following the Offering, the directors of Class II, Messrs. Simmons
and Cohen, hold office until the second scheduled annual meeting of shareholders
following the Offering and the directors of Class III, Messrs. Hunt, Peterson
and Tunstall, hold office until the third scheduled annual meeting of
shareholders following the Offering. Shareholders will elect the directors of
each class for three-year terms at the appropriate succeeding annual meetings of
shareholders. Executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of
the Board of Directors. Mr. Mallady will resign from the Board of Directors upon
consummation of the Offering. The vacancy in Class I of the Board of Directors
will be filled by the remaining members of the Board in accordance with the
provisions of the Bylaws relating thereto.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Company's Board of Directors has established an Executive Committee,
Audit Committee and Compensation Committee. The Executive Committee is
authorized to exercise the power and authority of the Board of Directors in the
management of the business and affairs of the Company subject to certain
limitations, including statutory restraints under Georgia law, as well as the
lack of Board authority to approve (i) acquisitions or other business
combinations, (ii) material changes in the strategic plan of the Company and
(iii) Company borrowings in excess of $7.0 million. The members of the Executive
Committee are Messrs. Hunt, Peterson, Tunstall and Adair. The Audit Committee is
responsible for nominating the Company's independent auditors for approval by
the Board of Directors, reviewing the scope, results and costs of the audit with
the Company's independent auditors, and reviewing the financial statements and
accounting practices of the Company. The members of the Audit Committee are
Messrs. Adair and Simmons. The Compensation Committee is responsible for
reviewing and approving the compensation arrangements for the Company's
executive officers and for administering the Stock Incentive Plan. The members
of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Tunstall and Cohen.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Outside Directors of the Company receive a fee of $1,000 for each meeting
of the Board of Directors attended and each meeting of a committee of the Board
of Directors attended (except for committee meetings held on the same days as
Board meetings). Directors are reimbursed for travel and other expenses incurred
in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or
committees thereof. Each Outside Director will automatically be granted, under
the Stock Incentive Plan, options to acquire, subject to certain vesting
requirements, up to 10,000 shares of Common Stock at the initial public offering
price concurrently with the consummation of the Offering. See "Stock Incentive
Plan."

41
<PAGE> 43

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

No executive officer of the Company received in excess of $100,000 for
services rendered to the Company during 1997. The Company has previously not
paid salaries to its CEO and President. After consummation of the Offering
Messrs. Hunt and Peterson will be compensated in accordance with the terms of
their Employment Agreements. See "-- Employment Agreements." As discussed
previously, the estimated fair value compensation of the CEO and President for
1995, 1996 and 1997 of $215,000, $320,000 and $365,000, respectively, has been
recorded in the historical financial statements of the Company with a
corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

The Company intends to enter into employment agreements with each of
Marshall B. Hunt and William E. Peterson, Jr. (collectively, the "Employment
Agreements") in connection with the Offering, which will provide for Mr. Hunt's
employment as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Mr.
Peterson's employment as President. The Employment Agreements each will have a
five-year term (subject to the right of either the Company or Messrs. Hunt and
Peterson to terminate the Employment Agreement upon 90 days notice) and provide
for initial annual base salaries for Messrs. Hunt and Peterson of $220,000 and
$190,000, respectively, with the opportunity to earn an annual bonus of 100% of
base salary if the annual increase in the Company's earnings per share is 35% or
more and 50% of base salary if the annual increase in earnings per share is at
least 25% but less than 35%. The Employment Agreements will provide that Messrs.
Hunt and Peterson are entitled to participate in all compensation, benefit and
insurance programs maintained by the Company in which executive officers are
eligible to participate and for certain other benefits, including reimbursement
for family medical and dental expenses which are not covered by insurance,
automobile leases and certain reimbursements for country club dues. In the event
the employment of either Mr. Hunt or Mr. Peterson is terminated without cause
(as defined), he would be entitled to receive his base salary and benefits for
the remaining term of the Employment Agreement, but in any event for no less
than three years following the date of termination, as well as bonus
compensation payable with respect to the calender year in which he is terminated
on a prorated basis. In the event of a change in control (as defined) of the
Company, Messrs. Hunt and Peterson would be entitled to receive, in lieu of
salary and benefits, a lump-sum payment equal to the base salary for the
remaining term of employment under the Employment Agreements, but in no event
for a period less than three years.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 1997, the Company did not have a Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors. In January 1998, the Company designated a Compensation Committee
whose function is to recommend to the Board of Directors compensation decisions
for the Company's executive officers and to administer the Company's Stock
Incentive Plan. In 1997, executive officer compensation decisions were made by
Messrs. Hunt and Peterson. See " -- Committees of the Board of Directors."

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

The Company has adopted the Stock Incentive Plan and has reserved 500,000
shares of Common Stock for issuance thereunder to key employees and Outside
Directors. The Stock Incentive Plan aims to (i) attract and retain the services
of key employees and Outside Directors, (ii) provide an additional incentive to
each key employee or Outside Director to work to increase the value of the
Company's Common Stock and (iii) provide each key employee or Outside Director
with a stake in the future of the Company which corresponds to the stake of each
of the Company's shareholders.

The Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, either incentive stock
options ("ISOs"), which are intended to qualify under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or non-incentive stock
options ("Non-ISOs") may be granted to key employees. Only Non-ISOs may be
granted to Outside Directors under the Stock Incentive Plan, and each person who
is an Outside Director upon consummation of this Offering will automatically be
granted a Non-ISO to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an option price
equal to the initial public offering price per share (i.e., the Outside
Directors' Options). In addition, upon
42
<PAGE> 44

consummation of the Offering, an executive officer will automatically be granted
an ISO to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock at an option price equal to the
initial public offering price per share (i.e., the Executive's Options).

Each option granted under the Stock Incentive Plan is exercisable in whole
or in part from time to time as set forth in the related option certificate, but
no option may be exercised: (i) before the end of the six-month period which
starts on the date such option is granted or (ii) on or after the earliest of
(A) the date which is the fifth anniversary of the date the option is granted,
if the option is an ISO and the key employee is a ten-percent shareholder of the
Company on the date the option is granted or (B) the date which is the tenth
anniversary of the date the option is granted, if such option is granted to a
key employee who is not a ten-percent shareholder of the Company on the date the
option is granted or if the option is a Non-ISO.

The Compensation Committee may grant SARs to key employees (but not Outside
Directors) in tandem with an option or as an independent grant. The Compensation
Committee may also grant restricted stock to key employees. No option, SAR or
restricted stock granted under the Stock Incentive Plan is transferable by a key
employee or Outside Director other than by will or by the laws of descent and
distribution, and any option or SAR is only exercisable during a key employee's
or Outside Director's lifetime only by the key employee or Outside Director.

The Stock Incentive Plan provides for adjustment of the number of shares of
Common Stock available for the grant of options or SARs, the option price of
such options and the SAR value of such SARs and the number, kind or class of
shares of restricted stock granted by the Compensation Committee in an equitable
manner to reflect any change in the capitalization of the Company.

If the Compensation Committee determines that there has been a "Change of
Control" of the Company (as defined) or a bona fide tender or exchange offer for
shares of Common Stock (other than a tender offer by the Company or an employee
benefit plan established and maintained by the Company), the Compensation
Committee has the right to take such action, if any, with respect to any or all
then outstanding options, SARs and restricted stock grants under the Stock
Incentive Plan as it deems appropriate under the circumstances to protect the
interests of the Company in maintaining the integrity of such grants under the
Stock Incentive Plan.

1995 STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS PLAN

Pursuant to the Company's 1995 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (the "SAR
Plan"), from June 1995 to date, the Company has granted an aggregate 124,000
SARs to eligible employees and eligible sales representatives based on their
achievement of certain performance targets. At April 9, 1998, 99,600 SARs were
outstanding. Upon consummation of the Offering, (i) all outstanding SARs will be
cancelled, (ii) the SAR Conversion Options will be granted to holders of SARs
who are then employed by the Company and (iii) cash compensation equal to one
dollar will be paid for each SAR held by persons who are not employed by the
Company upon consummation of the Offering. The SAR Conversion Options will be
exercisable, in increments of 25% per year over four years, commencing on the
first anniversary of the option grant date, at an exercise price per share equal
to the initial public offering price.

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

LOANS TO FOUNDERS

In connection with the purchase by Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson, the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Vice Chairman of the Board
and President of the Company, respectively, of an aggregate of 747,778 shares of
Common Stock from Cordova -- Enhanced Appreciation, a former lender to the
Company, on September 28, 1995, the Company loaned each of Messrs. Hunt, Mallady
and Peterson $77,612 (the "September Loans"). The September Loans to Messrs.
Hunt, Mallady and Peterson mature on September 20, 2000 and bear interest at a
rate of 8% per annum, payable annually. In addition, on October 12, 1995, the
Company loaned $35,000 to each of Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson (the
"October Loans"). The October Loans to Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson mature
on October 12, 2000 and bear interest at a

43
<PAGE> 45

rate of 8% per annum, payable annually. The October Loans were extended to
Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson for payment of certain taxes payable by
Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson. The original principal amounts of the
September Loans and the October Loans remain outstanding.

GUARANTEE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER LOAN AGREEMENTS BY FOUNDERS

Pursuant to Guaranty Agreements dated April 26, 1994 in favor of Cordova,
each of Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson guaranteed all amounts payable by the
Company to Cordova under the terms of a Loan Agreement dated April 26, 1994
between Cordova and the Company (the "Cordova Loan"). The Cordova Loan was in
the aggregate principal amount of $1.0 million and bore interest at 10% per
annum. The Cordova Loan was repaid in full by the Company in September 1995 and
the guarantees of Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson with respect thereto were
terminated.

Pursuant to Guaranty Agreements dated October 24, 1995 in favor of CB&T,
each of Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson guaranteed all amounts payable by the
Company to CB&T under a $1.7 million promissory note bearing interest at CB&T's
prime rate of interest plus 1% per annum issued by the Company to CB&T (the
"CB&T Note") in connection with the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition. The CB&T
Note was repaid in full by the Company in July 1997 and the guarantees of
Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson with respect thereto were terminated.

GUARANTEE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER LOAN AGREEMENTS BY CMI

Pursuant to a Guaranty Agreement dated September 25, 1995 in favor of
Sirrom, CMI guaranteed all amounts payable by the Company to Sirrom under the
Sirrom Note. On July 15, 1997, NationsCredit purchased the Sirrom Note in
connection with the Credit Facility and CMI's guarantee with respect thereto was
terminated.

In connection with the NeoStar Medical(R) Acquisition, pursuant to a
Guaranty Agreement dated October 24, 1995 in favor of CB&T, CMI guaranteed all
amounts payable by the Company to CB&T under the CB&T Note. The CB&T Note was
repaid in full in July 1997 and CMI's guarantee with respect thereto was
terminated.

CMI is a corporation co-founded by Messrs. Hunt and Mallady. Messrs. Hunt
and Mallady are the principal executive officers and shareholders of CMI and Mr.
Peterson is a ten-percent shareholder of CMI.

GUARANTEE OF REPAYMENT OF REVENUE BOND FINANCING BY CMI AND FOUNDERS

The development of the Company's Manchester, Georgia facility was financed
with approximately $705,000 in proceeds of an industrial development revenue
bond issuance in July 1996 by the Manchester Development Authority for the
benefit of the Company. In connection with and as a condition to such bond
financing, the Company entered into a lease with the Manchester Development
Authority. All payments due on the bonds have been guaranteed, jointly and
severally, by CMI and Messrs. Hunt, Peterson and Mallady.

PLEDGE OF COMMON STOCK BY FOUNDERS

Pursuant to Pledge Agreements dated July 15, 1997, each of Messrs. Hunt,
Mallady and Peterson have pledged all shares of capital stock of the Company
currently owned, or acquired by them in the future, to secure the obligations of
the Company under the Credit Facility. These pledges will be terminated upon
consummation of the Offering and the application of a portion of the net
proceeds thereof to terminate the Credit Facility. See "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Liquidity and
Capital Resources."

CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE

On February 1, 1996, the Company entered into a Consulting and Services
Agreement with Healthcare Alliance, an affiliate of Robert J. Simmons, a
director of the Company. Until February 1, 2002, Healthcare Alliance will assist
the Company in marketing its products through the negotiation of purchasing
agreements with hospital purchasing groups, physicians' organizations and other
medical service and healthcare providers. The agreement provides for (i) the
payment to Healthcare Alliance of an annual consulting fee of $36,000,

44
<PAGE> 46

(ii) the payment to Healthcare Alliance of an annual performance incentive fee
equal to 5% of any annual sales increase achieved by the Company that results
from Healthcare Alliance's efforts and (iii) the right of Healthcare Alliance to
receive from the Company up to the number of shares equal to 1.5% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock owned by Messrs. Hunt, Mallady and Peterson
at the time such payment becomes due, subject to the execution and delivery of
certain targeted group purchasing agreements, including the Premier Agreement.

CONSULTING AGREEMENTS WITH DIRECTORS

On May 8, 1997, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Robert
Cohen, a director of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Cohen has agreed to
provide acquisition consulting and related services to the Company. In the event
such services result in an acquisition or merger of the Company and a third
party, Mr. Cohen will be entitled to receive a fee (a "General Consulting Fee")
equal to 2.5% of the acquisition purchase price (x) payable by the Company with
respect to a company acquired by the Company or (y) payable to the Company or
its shareholders in the event the Company or any of the Company's assets are
acquired. The payment of such General Consulting Fee is conditioned upon the
completion of an initial public offering of the Company's capital stock or the
acquisition of substantially all of the Company's business or outstanding shares
of capital stock. Such General Consulting Fee is payable, at Mr. Cohen's option,
(i) in shares of Common Stock, (ii) by the Company's issuance to Mr. Cohen of
warrants or options to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that number of
shares of Common Stock (valued at the initial public offering price) which
equals the General Consulting Fee, (iii) in shares of the company which acquires
the Company, in the event the Company is acquired or (iv) in cash. The letter
agreement also provides for payments to Mr. Cohen for his consulting services in
connection with the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition and a second strategic
venture of $375,000 and $250,000, respectively (the "Specific Consulting Fees").
The Specific Consulting Fee relating to the Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Acquisition
is payable upon consummation of the Offering in shares of the Common Stock or
warrants or options to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that number of
shares of the Common Stock (valued at the initial public offering price) which
equals $375,000, at Mr. Cohen's option. Mr. Cohen has advised the Company that
he has elected to receive the Specific Consulting Fee relating to the
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM)Acquisition in cash. The Specific Consulting Fee for the
second strategic venture is payable only if such venture is completed and is
payable in warrants or options to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that
number of shares of Common Stock (valued at the initial public offering price)
which equals $250,000. Such Specific Consulting Fees are to be paid in lieu of
and not in addition to the General Consulting Fees described above with respect
to the strategic ventures.

During 1997, Tunstall Consulting, Inc., an affiliate of Gordon Tunstall, a
director of the Company, provided consulting services to the Company with
respect to the Offering and certain related matters. In consideration for such
services, the Company paid to Tunstall Consulting a fee of $235,699.

AGREEMENTS WITH CMI

The Company and CMI jointly own and occupy office space in the Company's
Atlanta Office and also have shared certain administrative employees. Pursuant
to an agreement between CMI and the Company dated January 1, 1995, CMI agreed to
provide, until December 31, 1997, certain management, administrative and
secretarial services to the Company from time to time when requested by the
Company. In January 1995, the Company paid CMI $150,000 for all services to be
rendered by CMI to the Company during the term of the agreement.

The Company has agreed to purchase from CMI for $472,000 the 3,300 square
foot portion of the Atlanta Office currently owned by CMI as well as certain
furnishings and equipment used at the Atlanta Office. See "Use of Proceeds."
------------------

Following consummation of the Offering, the Company does not intend to
enter into any material transactions with officers or directors, their family
members or affiliates of such officers or directors without the approval of a
majority of the directors who do not have an interest in any such transactions.
45
<PAGE> 47

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
beneficial ownership of the Company's capital stock prior to the Offering, and
as adjusted to give effect to the sale of shares of Common Stock in the
Offering, by (i) each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than
5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) the sole Named Executive
Officer of the Company (as defined under the Securities Act), (iii) each
director of the Company, (iv) all executive officers and directors of the
Company as a group and (v) each Selling Shareholder. Unless otherwise specified,
the named beneficial owner claims sole investment and voting power as to the
shares indicated. The table assumes (i) the persons it lists will not acquire
shares directly from the Underwriters in connection with the Offering, and (ii)
no other person will acquire beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the
outstanding Common Stock as a result of the Offering. See "Description of
Capital Stock."

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED(1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUMBER OF % OF CLASS NUMBER OF NUMBER OF % OF CLASS
SHARES PRIOR TO PRIOR TO SHARES OFFERED SHARES AFTER AFTER
OFFERING OFFERING HEREBY OFFERING OFFERING
--------------- ---------- -------------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS(2)
- ------------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt(3)................. 3,021,890 29.5% -- 3,645,732(4) 28.4%
Roy C. Mallady, Jr.(5).............. 3,021,885 29.5% -- 2,047,238(6) 15.9%
William E. Peterson, Jr............. 3,021,890 29.5% -- 2,921,890(7) 22.7%
Charles E. Adair.................... --(8) -- -- -- --
Robert Cohen........................ -- -- -- -- --
Robert J. Simmons(9)................ 45,328 * -- 45,328 *
Gordon Tunstall..................... -- -- -- -- --
All executive officers and directors
as a group (13 persons)(8)(9)(10).. 9,075,665 88.5% -- 8,624,860 67.1%
SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
- ----------------------
NationsCredit Commercial
Corporation(11)................... 765,000 7.5% 561,000 --(12) --
201 Broad Street
One Canterbury Green
Stanford, Connecticut 06901
Cordova Capital Partners, L.P. --
Enhanced Appreciation............. 202,979 2.0% 156,000 46,979 *
c/o 3350 Cumberland Circle, Suite
970
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
Roddy J. H. Clark................... 166,357 1.6% 156,000 10,357 *
230 Dapple Gate Way
Alpharetta, Georgia 30202
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Less than one percent.
(1) Includes shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon the exercise of
stock options or warrants exercisable within 60 days.
(2) Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the executive
officers and directors is the address of the Company, which is One Horizon
Way, P.O. Drawer 627, Manchester, Georgia 31816.

(3) Includes 924,210 shares of Common Stock owned by Hunt Family Investments,
L.L.L.P., a Georgia limited liability limited partnership of which Mr. Hunt
is the managing general partner. Mr. Hunt disclaims beneficial ownership of
such shares.

(4) Includes 831,789 shares of Common Stock which Mr. Hunt has agreed to
acquire from Mr. Mallady prior to the consummation of the Offering and
gives effect to the sale of 207,947 shares of Common Stock which Mr. Hunt
has agreed to sell to Tapir Investments (Bahamas) Ltd. ("Tapir"), an
affiliate of

46
<PAGE> 48

Caledonia Investments, PLC, a diversified trading and investment company
publicly held in England, prior to the consummation of the Offering.

(5) Includes 513,486 shares of Common Stock held by (i) trusts for the benefit
of various family members of Mr. Mallady with respect to which Mr. Mallady
is neither a trustee nor a beneficiary and (ii) certain family members of
Mr. Mallady. Mr. Mallady disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares.

(6) Gives effect to the sale of 831,789 shares of Common Stock which Mr.
Mallady has agreed to sell to Mr. Hunt prior to the consummation of the
Offering. In addition to such sale, Mr. Mallady has agreed to sell to Tapir
that number of shares of Common Stock, valued at the initial public
offering price per share, equal to an amount between $1.0 million and $3.0
million to be determined based on the valuation of the Company immediately
following the consummation of the Offering as derived from the amount of
the initial public offering price per share. Unless otherwise indicated,
all information in this Prospectus relating to Mr. Mallady's ownership of
Common Stock assumes an initial public offering price of $14.00 per share
(the mid-point of the range) and gives effect to the sale by Mr. Mallady to
Tapir of 142,857 shares of Common Stock.

(7) Gives effect to the sale of 100,000 shares of Common Stock which Mr.
Peterson has agreed to sell to Tapir concurrently with the consummation of
the Offering.

(8) Does not include 202,979 shares of Common Stock owned of record by
Cordova -- Enhanced Appreciation. Cordova -- Enhanced Appreciation is an
affiliate of Cordova, of which Mr. Adair is a principal. Mr. Adair
therefore may be deemed to beneficially own such shares.

(9) Healthcare Alliance has the right to receive the indicated shares in
connection with the Premier Purchasing Agreement. Mr. Simmons is a director
and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Healthcare Alliance and, as
such, may be deemed to beneficially own the indicated shares.

(10) Includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock subject to the Executive's Options.

(11) NationsCredit is an indirect subsidiary of NationsBank Corporation.
NationsBank Corporation is the parent corporation of NationsBanc Montgomery
Securities LLC.

(12) Gives effect to the sale of 204,000 shares of Common Stock which
NationsCredit has agreed to sell to Tapir concurrently with the
consummation of the Offering.

47
<PAGE> 49

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Upon consummation of the Offering, the authorized capital stock of the
Company will consist of 55,000,000 shares of capital stock, comprised of (i)
5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, no par value, issuable in one or more
series, and (ii) 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.001 par value, of which
12,800,000 shares of Common Stock will be issued and outstanding and no shares
of Preferred Stock will be issued and outstanding. As of the date of the
Offering, an aggregate of 10,200,000 shares of Common Stock were issued and
outstanding and no shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.

The following summary of certain provisions of the Common Stock and
Preferred Stock contained in the Articles and Bylaws is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Articles and Bylaws which are exhibits to the
Registration Statement of which this Prospectus is a part.

COMMON STOCK

The Common Stock has no preemptive rights and no redemption, sinking fund
or conversion provisions. All shares of Common Stock have one vote on any matter
submitted to the vote of shareholders. The Common Stock does not have cumulative
voting rights. Upon any liquidation of the Company, the holders of Common Stock
are entitled to receive, share for share on a pro rata basis, all assets then
legally available for distribution after payment of debts and liabilities and
preferences on Preferred Stock, if any. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to
receive dividends share for share on a pro rata basis when, as and if declared
by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor (subject to
the prior rights of Preferred Stock, if any).

PREFERRED STOCK

Upon consummation of the Offering the Board of Directors will have the
authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock in one or more
series and to fix the number of shares constituting any such series, the voting
powers, designation, preferences and relative participation, optional or other
special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof,
including the dividend rights and dividend rate, terms of redemption (including
sinking fund provisions), redemption price or prices, conversion rights and
liquidation preferences of the shares constituting any series, without any
further vote or action by the shareholders. The issuance of Preferred Stock by
the Board of Directors could affect the rights of the holders of Common Stock.
For example, such issuance could result in a class of securities outstanding
that would have preferences with respect to voting rights and dividends, and in
liquidation, over the Common Stock, and could (upon conversion or otherwise)
enjoy all of the rights appurtenant to Common Stock.

The authority possessed by the Board of Directors to issue Preferred Stock
could potentially be used to discourage attempts by others to obtain control of
the Company through a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise by making
such attempts more difficult to achieve or more costly. The Board of Directors
may issue the Preferred Stock with voting and conversion rights that could
adversely affect the voting power of the holders of Common Stock. There are no
agreements or understandings for the issuance of Preferred Stock and the Board
of Directors has no present intention to issue Preferred Stock.

PREMIER WARRANT

In connection with the Premier Purchasing Agreement, the Company entered
into a Warrant Agreement with Premier pursuant to which the Company has granted
Premier a warrant to acquire up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock at the initial
public offering price (i.e., the Premier Warrant). Shares of Common Stock
issuable under such warrant will vest annually in increments of 100,000 based
upon the achievement of certain specified minimum annual sales (the "Minimum
Annual Sales Targets") and/or minimum cumulative sales (the "Cumulative Sales
Targets") of the Company's products to participating Premier hospitals. The
vesting of the warrant will automatically accelerate in any given year in the
event that both the Minimum Annual Sales Targets and Cumulative Sales Targets
with respect to such year are achieved. Shares vesting at the end of the first
year of the Warrant Agreement (June 30, 1999) will become exercisable on the
third anniversary of such date. Shares vesting in subsequent years will become
exercisable one year after their respective vesting dates. All unexercised
warrant exercise rights will expire on the fifth anniversary of their respective
vesting dates. The Warrant Agreement provides for certain piggy-back
registration rights for the shares issuable to Premier thereunder.
48
<PAGE> 50

ANTI-TAKEOVER EFFECTS OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF GEORGIA LAW

The Georgia Code restricts certain business combinations with "interested
shareholders" (as defined below) (the "Business Combination Statute") and
contains fair price requirements applicable to certain mergers with certain
interested shareholders (the "Fair Price Statute"). In accordance with the
provisions of these statutes, the Company must elect in its Articles or Bylaws
to be covered by the restrictions imposed by these statutes. The Company has
elected to be covered by such restrictions.

The Business Combination Statute regulates business combinations such as
mergers, consolidations, share exchanges and asset purchases where the acquired
business has at least 100 shareholders residing in Georgia and has its principal
office in Georgia, as the Company does, and where the acquiror became an
interested shareholder of the corporation, unless either (i) the transaction
resulting in such acquiror becoming an interested shareholder or the business
combination received the approval of the corporation's board of directors prior
to the date on which the acquiror became an interested shareholder, or (ii) the
acquiror became the owner of at least 90% of the outstanding voting shares of
the corporation (excluding shares held by directors, officers and affiliates of
the corporation and shares held by certain other persons) in the same
transaction in which the acquiror became an interested shareholder. For purposes
of the Business Combination Statute and the Fair Price Statute, an "interested
shareholder" generally is any person who directly or indirectly, alone or in
concert with others, beneficially owns or controls 10% or more of the voting
power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation. The Business
Combination Statute prohibits business combinations with an unapproved
interested shareholder for a period of five years after the date on which such
person became an interested shareholder. The Business Combination Statute is
broad in its scope and is designed to inhibit unfriendly acquisitions.

The Fair Price Statute prohibits certain business combinations between a
Georgia business corporation and an interested shareholder. The Fair Price
Statute would permit the business combination to be effected if (i) certain
"fair price" criteria are satisfied, (ii) the business combination is
unanimously approved by the continuing directors, (iii) the business combination
is recommended by at least two-thirds of the continuing directors and approved
by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting shares,
other than voting shares beneficially owned by the interested shareholder or
(iv) the interested shareholder has been such for at least three years and has
not increased his ownership position in such three-year period by more than 1%
in any 12-month period. The Fair Price Statute is designed to inhibit unfriendly
acquisitions that do not satisfy the specified "fair price" requirements.

CERTAIN NOTICE AND VOTING PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS

Certain provisions of the Articles and Bylaws summarized in the following
paragraphs may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or
prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in
its best interest, including those attempts that might result in a premium over
the market price for the shares held by shareholders.

Special Meeting of Shareholders. The Bylaws provide that special meetings
of shareholders of the Company may be called only by the Board of Directors or
upon the written demand of the holders of not less than 70% of all votes
entitled to be cast on any issue proposed to be considered at a special meeting.
This provision will make it more difficult for shareholders to take actions
opposed by the Board of Directors.

Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder Proposals and Director
Nominations. The Bylaws provide that shareholders seeking to bring business
before an annual meeting of shareholders, or to nominate candidates for election
as directors at an annual meeting of shareholders, must provide timely notice
thereof in writing. To be timely, a shareholder's notice must be delivered to or
mailed and received at the executive offices of the Company not less than 120
days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the Company's notice of
annual meeting provided with respect to the prior year's annual meeting. The
Bylaws also specify certain requirements for a shareholder's notice to be in
proper written form. These provisions may preclude some shareholders from
bringing matters before the shareholders at an annual meeting or from making
nominations for directors at an annual meeting.

49
<PAGE> 51

Staggered Board. The Company's Articles and Bylaws provide for an eight
member Board of Directors to be elected, initially, to staggered one-, two- and
three-year terms and, thereafter for successive three-year terms. In addition,
directors may only be removed from office for cause upon a vote of 70% of the
Common Stock outstanding.

Amendments of Articles and Bylaws. The Company's Articles and Bylaws
provide that they may not be amended in certain respects except pursuant to the
vote of 70% of the Common Stock represented at a shareholders' meeting. These
provisions of the Articles and Bylaws could discourage potential acquisition
proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

The Transfer Agent and Registrar for the Common Stock is SunTrust Bank,
Atlanta.

50
<PAGE> 52

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Prior to the Offering, there has not been any public market for securities
of the Company. No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that market
sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale will have on the market
price prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts
of Common Stock in the public market could adversely affect the prevailing
market price.

Upon completion of the Offering, the Company will have outstanding
12,800,000 shares of Common Stock. All 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock
(3,993,950 shares if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in
full) sold by the Company in the Offering will be freely tradable without
restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that shares
owned by affiliates may generally only be sold by the Company in compliance with
applicable provisions of Rule 144. The remaining 10,200,000 shares of Common
Stock (the "Restricted Shares") held by existing shareholders upon completion of
the Offering will be "restricted" securities within the meaning of Rule 144 and
may not be sold except in compliance with the registration requirements of the
Securities Act or an applicable exemption under the Securities Act, including
sales pursuant to Rule 144.

The Company and certain of its directors, officers and shareholders have
agreed with the Underwriters not to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of
Common Stock during the Lock-Up, except for Permitted Transfers, issuances by
the Company pursuant to the exercise of stock options granted under the Stock
Incentive Plan and issuances in connection with acquisitions where the person
receiving the Common Stock agrees not to sell or otherwise dispose of such
shares until 180 days after the date of this Prospectus. See "Underwriting."
Beginning 90 days after the date of this Prospectus, all 2,047,238 shares of
Common Stock owned by Mr. Mallady will be eligible for sale in the public market
subject to compliance with the provisions of Rule 144. Beginning 180 days after
the date of this Prospectus, assuming that CSFBC does not consent to any sales
prior to such time or a Permitted Transfer does not occur, an additional
7,179,762 shares will become eligible for sale in the public market, subject to
compliance with the provisions of Rule 144. Of such aggregate 9,227,000 shares,
3,645,732 shares are held by Mr. Hunt, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, 2,047,238 shares are held by Mr. Mallady, the
Vice Chairman of the Board, and 2,921,890 shares are held by Mr. Peterson, the
President and a director of the Company, each of whom is an "affiliate" of the
Company within the meaning of Rule 144, and may, therefore, only be sold in the
public market in compliance with the volume limitations and other requirements
of Rule 144. CSFBC may, in its sole discretion and at any time without notice,
waive the provisions of the lock-up agreements.

In general, under Rule 144, a person (or persons whose shares are
aggregated), including an affiliate, who has beneficially owned Restricted
Shares for at least one year (including the holding period of certain prior
owners), will be entitled to sell in "restricted brokers' transactions" or to
market makers, within any three-month period commencing 90 days after the
Company becomes subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 of the
Exchange Act, a number of Restricted Shares that does not exceed the greater of
(i) 1% of the then outstanding shares of Common Stock (approximately 128,000
shares immediately after the Offering) or (ii) the average weekly trading volume
in the Common Stock during the four calendar weeks immediately preceding such
sale, subject, generally, to the filing of a Form 144 with respect to such sales
and certain other limitations and restrictions. In addition, a person (or
persons whose shares are aggregated), who is not deemed to have been an
affiliate at any time during the 90 days immediately preceding the sale and who
has beneficially owned the Restricted Shares proposed to be sold for at least
two years, is entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144(k) without regard to
the limitations described above.

The Company has granted under the Stock Incentive Plan, subject to the
consummation of the Offering, the Outside Directors' Options, the SAR Conversion
Options and the Executive's Options. Giving effect to the foregoing option
grants, options to purchase an additional 350,400 shares of Common Stock would
remain available for issuance pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan. See
"Management -- Stock Incentive Plan." In addition, the Company has granted to
Premier the Premier Warrant. Further, 45,328 shares of Common Stock are issuable
to an affiliate of the Company after the Offering and certain additional shares
of Common Stock may become issuable to such affiliate and another affiliate of
the Company as consulting fees. Sales of shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options under the Stock Incentive Plan and outside the Stock
Incentive Plan and upon exercise of the Premier Warrant generally are subject to
the limitations and restrictions under Rule 144. The Company intends to file one
or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register
all shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding options and future grants
under the Stock Incentive Plan.

51
<PAGE> 53

UNDERWRITING

Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an Underwriting
Agreement dated the date of this Prospectus (the "Underwriting Agreement") among
the Company, the Selling Shareholders and the underwriters named below (the
"Underwriters"), for whom CSFBC, BancAmerica Robertson Stephens and NationsBanc
Montgomery Securities LLC are acting as the representatives (the
"Representatives"), the Underwriters have severally but not jointly agreed to
purchase from the Company and the Selling Shareholders the following respective
numbers of shares of Common Stock:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF
UNDERWRITER SHARES
----------- -----------
<S> <C>
Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation......................
BancAmerica Robertson Stephens..............................
NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC.......................
-----------
Total.....................................................
===========
</TABLE>

The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the
Underwriters are subject to certain conditions precedent and that the
Underwriters will be obligated to purchase all of the shares of Common Stock
(other than those shares covered by the over-allotment option described below)
if any are purchased. The Underwriting Agreement provides that, in the event of
a default by an Underwriter, in certain circumstances the purchase commitments
of non-defaulting Underwriters may be increased or the Underwriting Agreement
may be terminated.

The Company has granted to the Underwriters an option exercisable by CSFBC,
expiring at the close of business on the 30th day after the date of this
Prospectus, to purchase up to 520,950 additional shares of Common Stock at the
initial public offering price less underwriting discounts and commissions, all
as set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus. Such option may be exercised
only to cover over-allotments, if any, in the sale of the shares of Common
Stock. To the extent such option is exercised, each Underwriter will become
obligated, subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the same
percentage of such additional shares of Common Stock as it was obligated to
purchase pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement.

The Company and the Selling Shareholders have been advised by the
Representatives that the Underwriters propose to offer the shares of Common
Stock to the public initially at the public offering price set forth on the
cover page of this Prospectus and, through the Underwriters, to certain dealers
at such price less a concession of $ per share, and the Underwriters
and such dealers may allow a discount of $ per share on sales to
certain other dealers. After the Offering, the public offering price and
concession and discount to dealers may be changed by the Representatives.

The Representatives have informed the Company and the Selling Shareholders
that the Underwriters will not engage in discretionary sales of the shares being
offered hereby. The Company intends to use more than 10% of the net proceeds
from the sale of the shares offered by the Company hereby to repay indebtedness
owed by it to NationsCredit, an affiliate of one of the Representatives.
Accordingly, the offering is being made in compliance with the requirements of
Rule 2710(c)(8) of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Conduct
Rules. This rule provides generally that if more than 10% of the net proceeds
from the sale of stock, not including underwriting compensation, is paid to the
underwriters or their affiliates, the initial public offering price of the stock
may not be higher than that recommended by a "qualified independent underwriter"
("QIU") meeting certain standards. Accordingly, CSFBC is assuming the
responsibilities of acting as the QIU in pricing the Offering and conducting due
diligence. The initial public offering price of the shares set forth on the
cover page of this Prospectus is no higher than the price recommended by CSFBC.

The Company and certain of its officers, directors and shareholders have
agreed that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell, announce their
intention to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or,
in the case of the Company, file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Commission") a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to
any additional shares of the Common Stock or securities convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of the Common Stock, without the
52
<PAGE> 54

prior written consent of CSFBC during the Lock-Up, except for a Permitted
Transfer, issuances by the Company pursuant to the exercise of stock options
granted under the Stock Incentive Plan and issuances in connection with
acquisitions where the person receiving the Common Stock agrees not to sell or
otherwise dispose of such shares until 180 days after the date of this
Prospectus.

The Underwriters have reserved for sale, at the initial public offering
price up to shares of the Common Stock for employees, directors and certain
other persons associated with the Company who have expressed an interest in
purchasing such shares of Common Stock in the Offering. The number of shares
available for sale to the general public in the Offering will be reduced to the
extent such persons purchase such reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so
purchased will be offered by the Underwriters to the general public on the same
terms as the other shares offered hereby.

The Company and the Selling Shareholders have agreed to indemnify the
Underwriters and the QIU against certain liabilities, including civil
liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments which the
Underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof.

Application has been made to list the shares of Common Stock on The Nasdaq
Stock Market's National Market under the proposed symbol "HMPS."

Prior to the Offering, there has been no public market for the Common
Stock. The initial public offering price for the shares of Common Stock will be
negotiated between the Company and the Representatives. Among the factors to be
considered in determining the initial public offering price of the Common Stock
will be the Company's historic performance, estimates of the business potential
and earnings prospects of the Company and its industry in general, an assessment
of the Company's management, the market valuation of companies in related
businesses, the general condition of the equity securities market and other
relevant factors. There can be no assurance that the initial public offering
price of the Common Stock will correspond to the price at which the Common Stock
will trade in the public market subsequent to the Offering or that an active
public market for the Common Stock will develop and continue after the Offering.

The Representatives, on behalf of the Underwriters, may engage in
over-allotment, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and
penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
Over-allotment involves syndicate sales in excess of the offering size, which
creates a syndicate short position. Stabilizing transactions permit bids to
purchase in the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not
exceed a specified maximum. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of
the Common Stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in
order to cover syndicate short positions. Penalty bids permit the
Representatives to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the
shares of Common Stock originally sold by such syndicate member are purchased in
a syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions. Such
stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may
cause the price of the Common Stock to be higher than it would otherwise be in
the absence of such transactions. These transactions may be effected on the
Nasdaq National Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at
any time.

NationsCredit, the beneficial owner of approximately 7.5% of the
outstanding Common Stock of the Company on a fully-diluted basis, is an indirect
subsidiary of NationsBank Corporation. NationsBank Corporation is the parent
corporation of NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC. See "Principal and Selling
Shareholders."

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS
FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

The following is a general discussion of certain U.S. federal income and
estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Common Stock
applicable to a beneficial owner thereof that is a "Non-U.S. Holder." A
"Non-U.S. Holder" is a person or entity other than (i) a citizen or resident of
the United States, (ii) a corporation or partnership created or organized in or
under the laws of the United States or of any state, (iii) an estate the income
of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax, regardless of its source or (iv)
a trust if (a) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary
supervision over the administration of the
53
<PAGE> 55

trust and (b) one or more United States persons have the authority to control
all substantial decisions of the trust.

An individual may, subject to certain exceptions, be deemed to be a
resident alien (as opposed to a non-resident alien) by virtue of being present
in the United States at least 31 days in the calendar year and for an aggregate
of at least 183 days during a three-year period that includes the current
calendar year (counting for such purposes all of the days present in the current
year, one-third of the days present in the immediately preceding year, and
one-sixth of the days present in the second preceding year). Resident aliens are
subject to U.S. federal tax as if they were U.S. citizens and, thus, are not
Non-U.S. Holders for purposes of this discussion.

This discussion is based on the Code existing and proposed regulations
promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof
as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change, including changes
with retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S.
federal income and estate taxation that may be important to Non-U.S. Holders in
light of their particular circumstances (including tax consequences applicable
to Non-U.S. Holders that are, or hold interests in Common Stock through,
partnerships or other fiscally transparent entities) and does not address United
States state and local or non-United States tax consequences. Prospective
Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the
particular U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences to them of owning and
disposing of Common Stock, as well as the tax consequences arising under the
laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.

DIVIDENDS

Subject to the discussion below, dividends, if any, paid to a Non-U.S.
Holder of Common Stock generally will be subject to United States withholding
tax at a rate of 30% of the gross amount of the dividend or such lower rate as
may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. Non-U.S. Holders (and in
the case of Non-U.S. Holders that are treated as partnerships or other fiscally
transparent entities, partners, shareholders or other beneficiaries of such
Non-U.S. Holders) may be required to satisfy certain certification requirements
and provide certain information in order to claim treaty benefits. Special rules
regarding the availability of treaty benefits apply with respect to entities
that are treated as partnerships or other fiscally transparent entities for U.S.
federal income tax purposes but treated as corporations for purposes of the tax
laws of an applicable treaty country (or, conversely, treated as corporations
for U.S. federal income tax purposes but treated as partnerships or other
fiscally transparent entities for purposes of the tax laws of an applicable
treaty country). Any such entities that hold Common Stock, and partners,
beneficiaries and shareholders of such entities, should consult their tax
advisors as to the applicability of such rules to their particular
circumstances.

Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder that are either (i) effectively
connected with the Non-U.S. Holder's conduct of a trade or business within the
United States or (ii) if a tax treaty applies, attributable to a permanent
establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder, will not be subject to the
withholding tax (provided in either case the Non-U.S. Holder files the
appropriate documentation with the Company or its Paying Agent), but, instead,
will be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax at the graduated rates in the
same manner as if the Non-U.S. Holder were a U.S. resident. In addition to such
graduated tax in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation,
effectively connected dividends or, if a tax treaty applies, dividends
attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the corporate Non-U.S. Holder,
may be subject to a "branch profits tax" which is imposed, under certain
circumstances, at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable tax treaty) of the non-U.S. corporation's effectively connected
earnings and profits, subject to certain adjustments.

GAIN ON DISPOSITION OF COMMON STOCK

A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax
(and no tax will generally be withheld) with respect to gain realized on a sale
or other disposition of Common Stock unless (i) the gain is effectively
connected with a trade or business of such Non-U.S. Holder in the United States
or, if a tax treaty applies, attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder, (ii) in the case of
54
<PAGE> 56

certain Non-U.S. Holders who are nonresident alien individuals and hold the
Common Stock as a capital asset, such individuals are present in the United
States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the sale or other disposition
and certain other conditions are met, (iii) the Non-U.S. Holder is subject to
tax pursuant to the provisions of the Code regarding the taxation of U.S.
expatriates, or (iv) the Company is or has been a "U.S. real property holding
corporation" within the meaning of the Code and the Non-U.S. Holder owned
directly or pursuant to certain attribution rules more than 5% of the Company's
Common Stock (assuming the Common Stock is regularly traded on an established
securities market within the meaning of the Code) at any time within the shorter
of the five-year period preceding such disposition or such Non-U.S. Holder's
holding period. The Company is not, and does not anticipate becoming, a U.S.
real property holding corporation.

If a Non-U.S. Holder who is an individual falls under clause (i) of the
preceding paragraph, he or she will, unless an applicable treaty provides
otherwise, be taxed on the net gain derived from the sale at regular graduated
U.S. federal income tax rates. If an individual Non-U.S. Holder falls under
clause (ii) of the preceding paragraph, he or she will be subject to a flat 30%
tax on the gain derived from the sale, which may be offset by certain United
States-source capital losses. If a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation falls
under clause (i) in the preceding paragraph, it will be taxed on the net gain
from the sale at regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates and may be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate
as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty) on the non-U.S. corporation's
effectively connected earnings and profits, subject to certain adjustments.

INFORMATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND BACKUP WITHHOLDING

Generally, the Company must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service
the amount of dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder and the amount, if any, of tax
withheld with respect to, such Non-U.S. Holder. A similar report is sent to the
Non-U.S. Holder. Pursuant to tax treaties or certain other agreements, the
Internal Revenue Service may make its reports available to tax authorities in
the recipient's country of residence.

Currently, United States backup withholding tax (which generally is a
withholding tax imposed at a rate of 31% on certain payments to persons that
fail to furnish the information required under the United States information
reporting requirements) will generally not apply to dividends paid on Common
Stock to a Non-U.S. Holder at an address outside the United States, unless the
payor has actual knowledge that the payee is a U.S. Holder. Backup withholding
tax generally will apply to dividends paid on Common Stock at addresses inside
the United States to Non-U.S. Holders who fail to provide certain identifying
information in the manner required.

In addition, information reporting and backup withholding imposed at a rate
of 31% will apply to the proceeds of a disposition of Common Stock paid to or
through a U.S. office of a broker unless the disposing holder, under penalties
of perjury, certifies as to its non-U.S. status or otherwise establishes an
exemption. Generally, U.S. information reporting and backup withholding will not
apply to a payment of disposition proceeds if the payment is made outside the
United States through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker. However, U.S.
information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply to a
payment of disposition proceeds outside the United States if the payment is made
through an office outside the United States of a broker that is (i) a U.S.
person, (ii) a foreign person which derives 50% or more of its gross income for
certain periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States or
(iii) a "controlled foreign corporation" for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
unless the broker maintains documentary evidence that the holder is a Non-U.S.
Holder and certain other conditions are met, or the holder otherwise establishes
an exemption.

Recently adopted United States Treasury regulations, which generally are
effective for payments made after December 31, 1998, subject to certain
transition rules, alter the foregoing rules in certain respects. Among other
things, such regulations provide certain presumptions under which a Non-U.S.
Holder is subject to backup withholding at the rate of 31% and information
reporting unless the Company receives certification from the holder of non-U.S.
status. Depending on the circumstances, this certification will need to be
provided (i) directly by the Non-U.S. Holder, (ii) in the case of a Non-U.S.
Holder that is treated as a partnership or
55
<PAGE> 57

other fiscally transparent entity, by the partners, shareholders or other
beneficiaries of such entity, or (iii) by certain qualified financial
institutions or other qualified entities on behalf of the Non-U.S. Holder.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the tax liability of
persons subject to backup withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax
withheld. If withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund may be
obtained, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal
Revenue Service.

FEDERAL ESTATE TAX

An individual holder who is not a citizen or resident (as defined for U.S.
federal estate tax purposes) of the United States and at the time of death is
treated as the owner of, or has made certain lifetime transfers of, an interest
in the Common Stock will be required to include the value thereof in his gross
estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to U.S. federal
estate tax unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.

NOTICE TO CANADIAN RESIDENTS

RESALE RESTRICTIONS

The distribution of the Common Stock in Canada is being made only on a
private placement basis exempt from the requirement that the Company and the
Selling Shareholders prepare and file a prospectus with the securities
regulatory authorities in each province where trades of the Common Stock are
effected. Accordingly, any resale of the Common Stock in Canada must be made in
accordance with applicable securities laws which will vary depending on the
relevant jurisdiction, and which may require resales to be made in accordance
with available statutory exemptions or pursuant to a discretionary exemption
granted by the applicable Canadian securities regulatory authority. Purchasers
are advised to seek legal advice prior to any resale of the Common Stock.

REPRESENTATIONS OF PURCHASERS

Each purchaser of the Common Stock in Canada who receives a purchase
confirmation will be deemed to represent to the Company, the Selling
Shareholders and the dealer from whom such purchase confirmation is received
that (i) such purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities laws
to purchase such Common Stock without the benefit of a prospectus qualified
under such securities laws, (ii) where required by law, that such purchaser is
purchasing as principal and not as agent, and (iii) such purchaser has reviewed
the text above under "-- Resale Restrictions."

RIGHTS OF ACTION (ONTARIO PURCHASERS)

The securities being offered are those of a foreign issuer and Ontario
purchasers will not receive the contractual right of action prescribed by
section 32 of the Regulation under the Securities Act (Ontario). As a result,
Ontario purchasers must rely on other remedies that may be available, including
common law rights of action for damages or rescission or rights of action under
the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

ENFORCEMENT OF LEGAL RIGHTS

All of the issuer's directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the Selling Shareholders may be located outside of Canada and, as a
result, it may not be possible for Canadian purchasers to effect service of
process within Canada upon the issuer or such persons. All or a substantial
portion of the assets of the issuer and such persons may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment against
the issuer or such persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment obtained in
Canadian courts against the issuer or such persons outside of Canada.

56
<PAGE> 58

NOTICE TO BRITISH COLUMBIA RESIDENTS

A purchaser of Common Stock to whom the Securities Act (British Columbia)
applies is advised that such purchaser is required to file with the British
Columbia Securities Commission a report within ten days of the sale of any
Common Stock acquired by such purchaser pursuant to the Offering. Such report
must be in the form attached to British Columbia Securities Commission Blanket
Order BOR #95/17, a copy of which may be obtained from the Company. Only one
such report must be filed in respect of Common Stock acquired on the same date
and under the same prospectus exemption.

TAXATION AND ELIGIBILITY FOR INVESTMENT

Canadian purchasers of Common Stock should consult their own legal and tax
advisors with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the Common
Stock in their particular circumstances and with respect to the eligibility of
the Common Stock for investment by the purchaser under relevant Canadian
legislation.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the Common Stock offered hereby will be passed upon for the
Company by King & Spalding, Atlanta, Georgia, and for the Selling Shareholders
by each of Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, Schreeder, Wheeler &
Flint, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia, and Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, Georgia.
Certain legal matters in connection with the Offering will be passed upon for
the Underwriters by Long Aldridge & Norman LLP, Atlanta, Georgia.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
the Company at December 31, 1996 and 1997, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1997, and the financial statements of
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) at December 31, 1995 and 1996, and for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 1996 and the six months ended June 30,
1997, appearing in this Prospectus and Registration Statement, have been audited
by Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., independent certified public accountants, as set
forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein and in the Registration
Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part, and are included in reliance
upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting
and auditing.

57
<PAGE> 59

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Report of Independent Accountants for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997....................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1996 and
1997................................................... F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1997...... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Deficit for the
Years Ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997........... F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the
Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 1997...... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ F-7
STRATO/INFUSAID INC.
Report of Independent Accountants for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended
June 30, 1997.......................................... F-21
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June
30, 1997............................................... F-22
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1996
(unaudited) and 1997................................... F-23
Statements of Shareholder's Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended
June 30, 1997.......................................... F-24
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1996
(unaudited) and 1997................................... F-25
Notes to Financial Statements............................. F-26
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Introduction to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements................................... F-31
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 1997........ F-32
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
as Adjusted at December 31, 1997....................... F-33
Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements................................... F-34
</TABLE>

F-1
<PAGE> 60

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors
Horizon Medical Products, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Horizon
Medical Products, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' deficit, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Horizon Medical Products, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Birmingham, Alabama
January 29, 1998, except as to
Note 16, as to which the date
is March 22, 1998

F-2
<PAGE> 61

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------
1996 1997
----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 217,753 $ 2,893,924
Accounts receivable -- trade (net of allowance for
doubtful accounts of $6,997 and $308,239 in 1996 and
1997, respectively).................................... 959,093 3,720,031
Inventories............................................... 1,155,214 5,405,861
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 167,648 366,942
Deferred taxes............................................ 569,393
----------- ------------
Total current assets.............................. 2,499,708 12,956,151
Property and equipment, net................................. 769,938 2,341,508
Intangible assets, net...................................... 2,877,803 15,726,406
Deferred taxes.............................................. 254,988
Other assets................................................ 28,068 297,852
----------- ------------
Total assets...................................... $ 6,175,517 $ 31,576,905
=========== ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Cash overdraft............................................ $ 31,637 $ --
Accounts payable -- trade................................. 680,604 1,722,183
Accounts payable -- affiliate............................. 5,191 4,212
Accrued salaries and commissions.......................... 140,758 240,682
Accrued royalties......................................... 59,622 109,304
Accrued interest.......................................... 80,812 218,525
Accrued acquisition liabilities........................... -- 762,859
Other accrued expenses.................................... 23,023 350,344
Income taxes payable...................................... -- 409,726
Current portion of long-term debt......................... 219,413 1,959,482
Current portion of payable under non-compete and
consulting agreements.................................. 240,839 336,268
----------- ------------
Total current liabilities......................... 1,481,899 6,113,585
Long-term debt, net of current portion...................... 5,052,822 23,970,805
Payable under non-compete and consulting agreements, net of
current portion........................................... 1,366,815 1,463,319
Put warrant repurchase obligation (Note 8).................. -- 11,000,000
Other liabilities........................................... 189,748 178,951
----------- ------------
Total liabilities................................. 8,091,284 42,726,660
----------- ------------
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Notes 8, 10 and 11)
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share; 5,000,000
shares authorized, none issued and outstanding (Note
8)..................................................... -- --
Common stock:
Class A, $.001 par value per share; 50,000,000 authorized,
9,419,458 shares issued and outstanding in 1996 and
1997 (Note 8).......................................... 9,419 9,419
Class B, $.001 par value per share; 500,000 authorized,
none issued and outstanding (Note 8)................... -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................ 905,771 1,270,771
Shareholders' notes receivable............................ (371,497) (398,525)
Accumulated deficit....................................... (2,459,460) (12,031,420)
----------- ------------
Total shareholders' deficit....................... (1,915,767) (11,149,755)
----------- ------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit....... $ 6,175,517 $ 31,576,905
=========== ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-3
<PAGE> 62

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales............................................... $5,003,633 $ 7,051,858 $ 15,798,123
Cost of goods sold...................................... 2,227,165 2,996,741 6,273,418
---------- ----------- ------------
Gross profit............................................ 2,776,468 4,055,117 9,524,705
Selling, general and administrative expenses............ 2,921,383 4,559,700 6,475,827
---------- ----------- ------------
Operating income (loss)............................... (144,915) (504,583) 3,048,878
---------- ----------- ------------
Other income (expense):
Interest expense (Notes 6 and 8)...................... (242,153) (733,961) (3,970,734)
Accretion of value of put warrant repurchase
obligation (Note 8)................................ -- -- (8,000,000)
Other income.......................................... -- 54,333 69,727
---------- ----------- ------------
(242,153) (679,628) (11,901,007)
---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before income taxes and extraordinary item....... (387,068) (1,184,211) (8,852,129)
Income tax benefit (expense)............................ 7,305 -- (319,831)
Effect of conversion to C Corporation status............ (7,305) -- --
---------- ----------- ------------
Loss before extraordinary item.......................... (387,068) (1,184,211) (9,171,960)
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt, net
of income tax effect of $0............................ (70,045) -- --
---------- ----------- ------------
Net loss.............................................. $ (457,113) $(1,184,211) $ (9,171,960)
========== =========== ============
Loss per share before extraordinary item -- basic and
diluted............................................... $ (.04) $ -- $ --
========== =========== ============
Net loss per share -- basic and diluted................. $ (.05) $ (.13) $ (.97)
========== =========== ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding.............. 9,143,766 9,419,089 9,419,458
========== =========== ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-4
<PAGE> 63

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996 AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CLASS A
COMMON STOCK
------------------ ADDITIONAL SHAREHOLDERS'
NUMBER OF PAR PAID-IN NOTES ACCUMULATED
SHARES VALUE CAPITAL RECEIVABLE DEFICIT TOTAL
--------- ------ ---------- ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31,
1994................... 90,900 $ 91 $ 380,074 $ -- $ (818,136) $ (437,971)
Issuance of common
stock.................. 11,000 11 14 -- -- 25
Issuance of shareholders'
notes receivable....... -- -- -- (337,837) -- (337,837)
Net increase in
shareholders' notes
receivable............. -- -- -- (6,559) -- (6,559)
Contributed services..... -- -- 215,000 -- -- 215,000
Net loss................. -- -- -- -- (457,113) (457,113)
--------- ------ ---------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31,
1995................... 101,900 102 595,088 (344,396) (1,275,249) (1,024,455)
Issuance of common
stock.................. 19 -- -- -- -- --
Net increase in
shareholders' notes
receivable............. -- -- -- (27,101) -- (27,101)
Contributed services..... -- -- 320,000 -- -- 320,000
Net loss................. -- -- -- -- (1,184,211) (1,184,211)
--------- ------ ---------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31,
1996................... 101,919 102 915,088 (371,497) (2,459,460) (1,915,767)
Net increase in
shareholders' notes
receivable............. -- -- -- (27,028) -- (27,028)
Repurchase of stock
warrants (Note 6)...... -- -- -- -- (400,000) (400,000)
Contributed services..... -- -- 365,000 -- -- 365,000
Net loss................. -- -- -- -- (9,171,960) (9,171,960)
Issuance of shares to
effect a stock split
(Note 16).............. 9,317,539 9,317 (9,317) -- -- --
--------- ------ ---------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance, December 31,
1997................... 9,419,458 $9,419 $1,270,771 $(398,525) $(12,031,420) $(11,149,755)
========= ====== ========== ========= ============ ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-5
<PAGE> 64

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss............................................... $ (457,113) $(1,184,211) $ (9,171,960)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt... 70,045 -- --
Depreciation......................................... 38,295 128,500 199,450
Amortization......................................... 71,335 337,136 1,009,180
Amortization of discount............................. 46,758 254,490 2,160,153
Accretion of value of put warrant repurchase
obligation........................................ -- -- 8,000,000
Gain on sale of property and equipment............... -- (5,829) --
Deferred income taxes, net change.................... -- -- (90,299)
Non-cash officer compensation (Note 10).............. 215,000 320,000 365,000
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:
Accounts receivable............................... 45,667 (186,593) (947,075)
Inventories....................................... (52,446) 85,668 183,557
Prepaid expenses and other assets................. (23,929) 173,574 (205,585)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Accounts payable -- trade......................... (371,039) (197,745) 859,713
Accounts payable -- affiliate..................... 21,159 1,417 (979)
Income taxes payable.............................. -- -- 409,726
Accrued expenses and other liabilities............ (66,966) 385,050 (49,569)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities................................... (463,234) 111,457 2,721,312
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures................................... (20,062) (91,846) (899,563)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment........... -- 7,800 --
Payment for acquisition, net of cash acquired.......... (1,531,987) -- (19,500,000)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash used in investing activities............. (1,552,049) (84,046) (20,399,563)
----------- ----------- ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Notes receivable -- shareholders....................... (344,396) (27,101) (27,028)
Cash overdraft......................................... 76,148 (44,511) (31,637)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt............... 3,209,186 -- 23,500,000
Principal payments on long-term debt................... (1,071,552) (132,282) (2,012,163)
Debt issue costs....................................... (59,944) -- (674,750)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock................. 25 -- --
Payment for warrants................................... -- -- (400,000)
----------- ----------- ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities...................................... 1,809,467 (203,894) 20,354,422
----------- ----------- ------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents..................................... (205,816) (176,483) 2,676,171
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year........... 600,052 394,236 217,753
----------- ----------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year................. $ 394,236 $ 217,753 $ 2,893,924
=========== =========== ============
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for interest............ $ 219,514 $ 423,766 $ 1,173,992
=========== =========== ============
</TABLE>

See Notes 12 and 13 for additional supplemental disclosures of cash flow
information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.

F-6
<PAGE> 65

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Horizon Medical Products, Inc. (the "Company") is a specialty medical
device company focused on manufacturing and marketing vascular access products.
The Company manufactures and markets products in three vascular access product
categories: (i) implantable vascular access ports, which are used primarily in
cancer treatment protocols for the infusion of highly concentrated toxic
medications (such as chemotherapy agents, antibiotics or analgesics) and blood
samplings; (ii) hemodialysis catheters, which are used primarily in treatments
of patients suffering from renal failure who require short-term or long-term
hemodialysis treatments; and (iii) central venous catheters, which are used
primarily in stem cell apheresis procedures for treating certain forms of mid-
and late-stage cancers. The Company was incorporated in Georgia in 1990.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of accounting policies utilized in the
consolidated financial statements which were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements and
notes to consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition -- The Company records sales upon shipment of the
related product, net of any discounts.

Export Sales -- The Company's export sales, which are denominated in U.S.
currency, totaled approximately $200,000, $1,200,000, and $2,700,000 in 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively.

Cash and Cash Equivalents -- The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of
purchase to be cash equivalents.

Inventories -- Purchased finished goods inventory is valued at the lower of
cost or market using the specific identification method for determining cost.
Raw materials, work in process, and manufactured ports and catheters are valued
at the lower of average cost or market.

Property and Equipment -- Property and equipment are carried at cost, less
accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged
to expense as incurred; betterments that materially prolong the lives of the
assets are capitalized. The costs of assets retired or otherwise disposed of and
the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the
related gain or loss on such dispositions is included in other income.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method or double declining
balance method over the estimated useful lives of the property and equipment.
The lives of the assets range from five to seven years for equipment to
approximately 31.5 years for buildings.

Property and equipment acquired under capital lease agreements are carried
at cost less accumulated depreciation. These assets are depreciated in a manner
consistent with the Company's depreciation policy for purchased assets.

Intangible Assets -- Goodwill, the excess of purchase price over the fair
value of net assets acquired in purchase transactions, is being amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods ranging from 15 to 30 years. The Company
assesses the recoverability and the amortization period of the goodwill by
determining whether the amount can be recovered through undiscounted cash flows
of the businesses acquired over the remaining amortization period. Additionally,
goodwill is evaluated for recoverability utilizing a fair value approach.
Amounts paid or accrued for non-compete and consulting agreements are amortized
using the straight-line method over the term of the agreements of approximately
seven years. Patents are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining lives of the related patents which range from six to 15 years. Debt
issuance costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated
term of the related debt issues.

F-7
<PAGE> 66
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Long-Lived Assets -- The Company recognizes impairment losses on long-lived
assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than
the assets' carrying amount. There were no such losses recognized during the
years ended December 31, 1995, 1996 and 1997.

Research and Development -- Research and development costs are charged to
expense as incurred and were approximately $66,000, $59,000 and $7,000 in 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively.

Income Taxes -- Effective January 1, 1995, the shareholders of the Company
elected to be taxed as a C Corporation and, accordingly, revoked its S
Corporation status. As a result, the Company recorded a deferred tax liability
and recognized income tax expense of $7,305 at the effective date of the change.

The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial
statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial
statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities relate primarily to the
existence of net operating loss carryforwards and differences in the book and
tax basis of property and equipment, intangible assets, and accrued liabilities.

Stock-Based Compensation -- Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", encourages, but does
not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee
compensation plans at fair value. The Company has elected to account for its
stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees" ("APB 25"). Under the provisions of APB 25, compensation cost for
stock options issued to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the
quoted market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant over the
amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. An award to employees which
requires or can compel the Company to settle such award in cash (such as stock
appreciation rights) is accounted for as a liability. The amount of the
liability for such an award is measured each period based on the settlement
value with changes in such value recorded as compensation cost over the service
period.

Stock based transactions with other than employees are measured at fair
value and are reported as expense or an exchange of assets, as appropriate,
under the provisions of SFAS 123.

Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications -- Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1995
and 1996 financial statements to make them comparable to the 1997 presentation.
These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net loss.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards -- In June 1997, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income,
which requires the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components in an entity's financial statements, and SFAS No. 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which specifies revised
guidelines for determining an entity's operating segments and the type and level
of financial information to be required. The Company is required to adopt these
standards in 1998. The Company does not expect the impact of these
pronouncements to be material.

F-8
<PAGE> 67
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

3. INVENTORIES

A summary of inventories at December 31, is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials............................................... $ 176,960 $2,300,745
Work in process............................................. 427,737 692,054
Finished goods.............................................. 573,056 2,662,995
---------- ----------
1,177,753 5,655,794
Less inventory reserves..................................... 22,539 249,933
---------- ----------
$1,155,214 $5,405,861
========== ==========
</TABLE>

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of property and equipment at December 31, is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Building and improvements................................... $ 423,640 $1,271,309
Office equipment............................................ 223,224 669,316
Plant equipment............................................. 317,761 781,737
Transportation equipment.................................... 12,316 13,283
---------- ----------
976,941 2,735,645
Less accumulated depreciation............................... 207,003 394,137
---------- ----------
$ 769,938 $2,341,508
========== ==========
</TABLE>

5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

A summary of intangible assets at December 31, is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Debt issuance costs......................................... $ 63,947 $ 738,697
Non-compete and consulting agreements....................... 1,473,091 1,473,091
Goodwill.................................................... 1,735,754 13,283,787
Patents..................................................... -- 1,635,000
---------- -----------
3,272,792 17,130,575
Less accumulated amortization............................... 394,989 1,404,169
---------- -----------
$2,877,803 $15,726,406
========== ===========
</TABLE>

The expected amortization charges related to these intangibles are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $ 1,111,717
1999........................................................ 832,204
2000........................................................ 832,204
2001........................................................ 832,204
2002........................................................ 797,131
Thereafter.................................................. 11,320,946
-----------
$15,726,406
===========
</TABLE>

F-9
<PAGE> 68
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

6. LONG-TERM DEBT

On September 25, 1995, the Company issued a $1,500,000 note (the "Sirrom
Note") bearing interest at 13.75%. The proceeds of the Sirrom Note were used to
repay debt, finance the acquisition of the net assets of Neostar Medical
Technologies, Inc. ("Neostar") and provide additional working capital. As a
result, the Company recorded an extraordinary loss on the early extinguishment
of previously outstanding debt in the amount of $70,045. In conjunction with the
financing, the Company issued warrants to its lender, Sirrom Capital Corporation
("Sirrom"), to acquire 8.25% of the shares of the Company's voting stock
outstanding as of the date of the agreement.

In connection with the acquisition of Strato/Infusaid Inc. ("Strato")
discussed in Note 13, the Company entered into a $26.5 million Credit Facility
with NationsCredit on July 15, 1997 (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility
provides the Company with a term loan in the amount of $21,500,000 (the "Tranche
A Loan") repayable in quarterly installments ranging from $537,500 to $1,075,000
through 2004, a term loan in the amount of $2,000,000 (the "Tranche B Loan")
repayable in four quarterly installments of $500,000 each occurring the earlier
of the sixth anniversary of the closing date or the date on which the Tranche A
Loan has been repaid in its entirety, and a revolving line of credit of up to
$3,000,000 repayable on the earlier of July 1, 2004 or the date on which all
amounts outstanding under the Tranche A Loan and the Tranche B Loan have been
repaid in full. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit and Tranche A Loan
bear interest at NationsCredit's Commercial Paper Rate plus 4.25% (9.836% at
December 31, 1997). Borrowings under the Tranche B Loan bear interest at
NationsCredit's Commercial Paper Rate plus 5.25% (10.836% at December 31, 1997).
Subject to certain limitations, amounts outstanding under each of the Tranche A
Loan, the Tranche B Loan and the revolving line of credit may be prepaid at the
Company's option subject, in certain cases, to the payment of a prepayment
premium of 3.00%. Amounts outstanding under the Tranche A Loan and the Tranche B
Loan are mandatorily prepayable, without penalty, in increments upon the
occurrence of certain events, including, without limitation, issuances by the
Company of common stock and other equity securities the proceeds of which exceed
$250,000, and consummation by the Company of certain asset sales. The Credit
Facility prohibits or restricts the Company from many actions, including paying
dividends and incurring or assuming other indebtedness or liens.

The Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by liens on
substantially all of the Company's assets, including inventory, accounts
receivable and general intangibles and a pledge of the stock of the Company's
subsidiaries. The Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are also
guaranteed by each of the Company's subsidiaries (the "Guarantees"). The
obligations of such subsidiaries under the Guarantees are secured by liens on
substantially all of their respective assets, including inventory, accounts
receivable and general intangibles. As additional security, the majority
shareholders have pledged all shares of their common stock as collateral.

As of December 31, 1997, there was $21.5 million outstanding under the
Tranche A Loan, $2.0 million outstanding under the Tranche B Loan and zero
outstanding under the revolving line of credit.

In addition to the acquisition of Strato, the Company used proceeds from
the Credit Facility to retire approximately $1,700,000 of the Company's existing
debt. The Company also used proceeds of $400,000 to purchase the warrants issued
in connection with the Sirrom Note from Sirrom thereby terminating all of
Sirrom's rights under the warrants. This purchase resulted in a direct charge to
the Company's accumulated deficit. NationsCredit also effectively purchased the
$1,500,000 Sirrom Note from Sirrom. The Sirrom Note bears interest at the rate
of 13.75% per annum and matures September 25, 2000.

In conjunction with the financing, the Company issued a warrant to
NationsCredit to acquire shares of non-voting Class B Common Stock of the
Company, which then represented 15% of the outstanding common shares of the
Company. The number of shares subject to such warrant will be reduced as
follows: (1) to 7.5% of the outstanding common shares of the Company on a fully
diluted basis in the event the Company

F-10
<PAGE> 69
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

completes an initial public offering for its shares prior to January 1, 1999
(where the net proceeds to the Company are in excess of $25 million) or achieves
minimum earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
("EBITDA") of not less than $10 million for its 1998 fiscal year or (2) to 10%
of the outstanding common shares of the Company on a fully diluted basis in the
event the Company completes an initial public offering of its shares during 1999
but prior to July 16, 1999 (where the net proceeds to the Company are in excess
of $25 million) or achieves EBITDA of not less than $14 million for the twelve
months ending June 30, 1999. The warrant is exercisable at $.01 per share
pursuant to the warrant agreement and expires on July 15, 2007. NationsCredit
can require the Company to repurchase the warrant at the earliest repurchase
date (July 15, 2001 or upon repayment of the associated debt) at the redemption
price as defined in the warrant agreement. As more fully described in Note 8,
accounting for the amortization of the debt discount and debt issue costs
results in an effective interest rate on the NationsCredit debt of approximately
31% for 1997 and a charge to earnings in 1997 of $8,000,000 related to the put
feature.

At December 31, long-term debt consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
NationsCredit Credit Facility less unamortized discount of
$1,166,667 at December 31, 1997........................... $ -- $22,333,333
Note payable bearing interest payable monthly at a fixed
rate of 13.75%, due September 25, 2000; collateralized by
inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, general
intangibles, trademarks and copyrights (the Sirrom
Note)..................................................... 1,500,000 1,500,000
Note payable, bearing interest payable monthly at prime plus
1% (9.5% at December 31, 1996); retired July 15, 1997..... 1,676,389 --
Note payable (the "Acquisition Note"), non-interest bearing
(less unamortized discount of $937,790 and $774,264 at
December 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively, based on an
imputed interest rate of 10%), with payments due monthly
beginning January 31, 1997 (see below) and continuing
through June 30, 2000 and 5 payments on various dates
through October 31, 2003. The payments are subordinated to
the Sirrom Note........................................... 1,523,227 1,511,749
Note payable, bearing interest at a variable rate (9.25% and
9.5% at December 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively); payable
in monthly payments of interest and principal through May
25, 2000; collateralized by a building.................... 353,455 342,588
Note payable, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.9%,
interest and principal payable monthly through May 11,
2000; collateralized by a vehicle......................... -- 9,286
Note payable, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 10%,
interest and principal payable monthly through March 10,
1997...................................................... 743 --
Note payable, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.84%,
interest and principal payable monthly through September
30, 1998.................................................. -- 161,719
Note payable, bearing interest at a fixed rate of 7.827%,
interest and principal payable monthly through September
30, 1997.................................................. 111,707 --
Miscellaneous capital lease obligations for office
equipment, requiring monthly payments ranging from $133 to
$2,729, including principal and interest at 9.25%, and
maturing at dates ranging from 1999 to 2001. These
obligations are collateralized by equipment with a net
book value of approximately $108,000 and $89,000 at
December 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively.................. 106,714 71,612
---------- -----------
5,272,235 25,930,287
Less: current portion....................................... 219,413 1,959,482
---------- -----------
Long-term debt, net of current portion...................... $5,052,822 $23,970,805
========== ===========
</TABLE>

F-11
<PAGE> 70
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Future maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $ 1,959,482
1999........................................................ 3,166,572
2000........................................................ 5,224,423
2001........................................................ 4,217,253
2002........................................................ 4,473,682
Thereafter.................................................. 8,829,806
-----------
27,871,218
Less unamortized discount on notes payable.................. (1,940,931)
-----------
Carrying amount of long-term debt........................... $25,930,287
===========
</TABLE>

On July 31, 1997, the Acquisition Note was amended to reduce total payments
due in 1997 from $212,235 to $175,000. The payment of the remaining amount of
$37,235 was deferred until the final payment date of this note of October 31,
2003. The amendment also requires quarterly payments of interest on the deferred
amount at prime plus 1% (9.50% at December 31, 1997).

The Company's long-term debt agreements contain certain restrictive
covenants which require the maintenance of minimum EBITDA, minimum tangible
worth/deficit and a cash flow to debt service ratio as well as place limitations
on dividends, advances, and other borrowings. The Company is in compliance with
or has received appropriate waivers of these covenants.

7. INCOME TAXES

There was an income tax benefit in 1995 of $7,305 related to federal
deferred income taxes. There was no provision or benefit for income taxes during
1996 due to the Company recording a full valuation allowance. The provision
(benefit) for income taxes in 1997 is comprised of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1997
--------
<S> <C>
Current:
Federal................................................... $681,209
State..................................................... 102,237
--------
783,446
Deferred tax benefit...................................... (90,299)
--------
693,147
Change in valuation allowance............................... (373,316)
--------
Total provision for income taxes.................. $319,831
========
</TABLE>

F-12
<PAGE> 71
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 1996 and 1997 are
comprised of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
--------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns............... $ 2,659 $ 127,482
Inventory reserve......................................... -- 105,071
Intangible assets......................................... 49,758 413,874
Accrued liabilities....................................... -- 336,840
Net operating loss carryforwards.......................... 328,814 --
--------- ---------
Total gross deferred tax assets................... 381,231 983,267
--------- ---------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment.................................... (7,915) (158,886)
--------- ---------
373,316 824,381
Less valuation allowance.................................... (373,316) --
--------- ---------
Net deferred tax asset...................................... $ -- $ 824,381
========= =========
</TABLE>

The Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred
tax assets in 1995 and 1996. The Company's primary tax assets were its net
operating loss carryforwards, as to which there was uncertainty whether they
could be fully utilized. During 1997, the Company generated taxable income
sufficient to fully utilize the net operating loss carryforwards. No valuation
allowance was recorded against the deferred tax asset at December 31, 1997 as
the Company believes that it is more likely than not that all of the net
deferred tax asset will be realized through future taxable income.

The provision for income taxes differs from the amount which would be
computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 34% to pre-tax earnings as
indicated below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax provision (benefit) at statutory federal
income tax rate.................................. $(155,418) $(402,632) $(3,009,724)
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Non-deductible meals and entertainment expense... 18,294 21,849 28,698
State income taxes............................... -- -- 64,353
Non-deductible interest and accretion of put
warrant repurchase obligation................. -- -- 3,343,333
Non-deductible amortization of goodwill.......... -- -- 59,985
Non-deductible officer compensation.............. 73,100 108,800 124,100
Change in valuation allowance.................... 56,719 271,983 (373,316)
Other, net....................................... -- -- 82,402
--------- --------- -----------
Total income tax provision (benefit)..... $ (7,305) $ -- $ 319,831
========= ========= ===========
</TABLE>

8. CAPITAL STOCK AND WARRANTS

The Company increased the total number of common shares authorized,
effective July 9, 1997, to 5,000,000, consisting of 4,500,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock at $.001 par value per common share and 500,000 shares of
non-voting Class B Common Stock at $.001 par value per common share. At any
time, each share of Class B Common Stock may, at the option of the holder
thereof, be converted into one share of Class A Common Stock. (See Note 16.)

F-13
<PAGE> 72
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

In addition, the Company authorized 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock for
issuance (see Note 16). The preferences, powers, and rights of the preferred
stock are to be determined by the Company's board of directors. None of these
shares are issued and outstanding.

The Company has a 1.99% owner (Cordova) which has anti-dilution rights.
Additionally, a warrant, representing 7.5% of outstanding shares for each period
presented, issued in connection with the Credit Facility, as discussed below and
in Note 6, contains anti-dilution provisions.

As discussed in Note 6, in connection with the Credit Facility, the Company
issued a warrant to NationsCredit to acquire shares of non-voting Class B Common
Stock, representing 15% of outstanding shares. This percentage reduces to 7.5%
under certain conditions including completion of an initial public offering by
the Company prior to January 1, 1999 where the net proceeds are in excess of $25
million. The warrant also contains a put feature which allows the holder to put
the warrant to the Company for cash at an amount calculated as the greater of
several financial tests and at dates which vary as to actions of the Company,
the earliest of which is repayment of the associated debt, or July 15, 2001.

The Company recorded the estimated value of the warrant with the put
feature on July 15, 1997 of $3,000,000 as a discount to the related debt and as
a put warrant repurchase obligation. Subsequent to issuance of the warrant, the
Company's operations and other factors indicated that an initial public offering
of stock could be pursued, and the Company began intense efforts to accomplish
such an offering. The Company and its prospective underwriters anticipate a
public offering in April 1998. A portion of the proceeds will be used to pay off
the Credit Facility as is required by the credit agreement upon successful
completion of an initial public offering. Additionally, the integration of
Strato, medical device market trends, and potential access to the public capital
markets lead management to believe the estimated value of the put warrants has
increased. Therefore, the value assigned to such put warrant is recorded herein
at $11,000,000 at December 31, 1997. The change in value from date of issue of
$8,000,000 has been recorded as a non-cash expense for the accretion of value of
put warrant repurchase obligation in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 1997. Additionally, due to the
expected date of debt repayment of April 1998, the debt discount established at
issue date and the associated debt issue costs are being amortized over a nine
month period beginning July 15, 1997. This amortization resulted in a charge to
interest expense of approximately $2,300,000 in 1997, resulting in an effective
rate of interest on the underlying debt of approximately 31% (exclusive of the
$8,000,000 put warrant charges).

Effective January 29, 1998, NationsCredit and the Company amended the
warrant agreement such that NationsCredit's right to put the warrant to the
Company for cash was rescinded. This constituted a forgiveness of the put
obligation estimated at $1,100,000 to be recorded at the date of rescission and
the net recorded value of the warrant was reclassed to additional paid-in
capital in 1998.

9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In 1995, the Company approved a Stock Appreciation Rights Plan ("SAR Plan")
which provides for the granting of stock appreciation rights to eligible
employees and eligible sales representatives based on their performance as
determined by the Board of Directors. Benefits under the SAR Plan are payable in
cash. If there is a public offering of the Company's stock or an acquisition of
the Company, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, the units may be
canceled or modified and thereafter the vested benefits may be paid in cash, a
number of shares of voting stock, or a number of options to purchase shares of
voting stock. An eligible employee's or eligible sales representative's benefit
attributable to each unit is equal to the excess of the accumulated
deficit/retained earnings value as of the last day of the Company's fiscal year
plus $1.00 over the

F-14
<PAGE> 73
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

accumulated deficit/retained earnings value as of the date of the grant. The
accumulated deficit/retained earnings value is calculated according to the
following formula:

retained earnings/(accumulated deficit) X 5%
--------------------------------------------
total number of SAR units

The SAR Plan also provides that the value of each SAR unit shall never be
less than $1.00.

The units become fully vested and are exercisable after four years of
service from the date of the grant. The Company has not restricted the number of
shares of voting stock subject to issuance under the SAR Plan. Further, the
Company has not reserved any of the Company's voting stock for issuance under
the SAR Plan.

Transactions under the SAR Plan are summarized as follows for the years
ended December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
------ -------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding, beginning of year............................. -- 29,750 40,900
Granted (at $1.00 per unit)................................ 29,750 30,050 64,200
Canceled................................................... -- (18,900) (5,500)
------ -------- ------
Outstanding, end of year................................... 29,750 40,900 99,600
====== ======== ======
Exercisable, end of year................................... -- -- --
====== ======== ======
</TABLE>

The cumulative expense recorded by the Company with respect to the plan
through December 31, 1997 was approximately $35,000 and has been recorded in
accrued liabilities.

10. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company and Cardiac Medical, Inc. ("CMI") are related parties due to
common stock ownership by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
("CEO") and Vice-Chairman of the Board of the Company. The Company and CMI share
office space and certain administrative employees. The Company paid CMI $150,000
in 1995 and expensed $50,000 during each of 1995, 1996 and 1997 related to these
shared services. CMI previously guaranteed the Sirrom Note. On July 15, 1997, in
connection with the Credit Facility, NationsCredit effectively purchased the
Sirrom Note and CMI's guarantee with respect thereto was terminated.

At December 31, 1996 and 1997, the Company has unsecured loans to the
majority shareholders in the form of notes receivable in the amount of $337,837.
The notes require annual payments of interest at 8% beginning on September 28,
1997 and are due September 2000 through October 2000. In addition, the Company
recognized interest income of $6,559, $27,101 and $27,028 during 1995, 1996 and
1997, respectively, related to the notes. The notes and related accrued interest
are recorded as contra-equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The CEO and the President of the Company, who collectively hold 64% of the
Company's stock, do not draw a salary or other form of compensation from the
Company. Annual salaries totaling $410,000 are anticipated for these officers
subsequent to a successful initial public offering. Estimated fair value
compensation for 1995, 1996 and 1997 of $215,000, $320,000 and $365,000,
respectively, has been recorded in the historical financial statements of the
Company with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.

On February 1, 1996, the Company entered into a Consulting and Services
Agreement with Healthcare Alliance (the "Alliance Agreement"), an affiliate of
one of the Company's directors. The Alliance Agreement provides for (i) the
payment to Healthcare Alliance of an annual consulting fee of $36,000, (ii) the
payment to Healthcare Alliance of an annual performance incentive fee equal to
5% of any annual sales increase achieved by the Company that results from
Healthcare Alliance's efforts and (iii) the grant of up to 1.5% of shares of the
Company's stock owned by the majority shareholders at the time such payment
becomes due, subject to the execution and delivery of certain targeted group
purchasing agreements. The Alliance
F-15
<PAGE> 74
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Agreement terminates on January 31, 1999 and will automatically renew for
another three year term unless the Company notifies Healthcare Alliance 30 days
prior to the beginning of the third year. The Company incurred expense of
$30,000 and $36,000 related to the Alliance Agreement during the years ended
December 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively. There were no incentive fee amounts
paid nor grants of Company stock during the years ended December 31, 1996 and
1997.

On May 8, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement (the "Agreement")
with a director of the Company (the "Director") in which the Director will
provide acquisition consulting and related services to the Company. The Director
will receive a fee (the "General Consulting Fee") equal to 2.5% of the
acquisition purchase price (i) payable by the Company with respect to a company
acquired by the Company or (ii) payable to the Company or its shareholders in
the event the Company is acquired. Such General Consulting Fee is conditioned
upon, and is not payable until, there has occurred an initial public offering of
the Company's capital stock or substantially all of the Company's business or
outstanding shares of capital stock is acquired. Such General Consulting Fee is
payable, at the Director's option, (i) in shares of the Company's common stock
after an initial public offering, (ii) by the Company's issuance to the Director
of warrants or options to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that number of
shares of common stock (valued at the initial public offering price) which
equals the General Consulting Fee, (iii) in shares of the company which acquires
the Company, in the event the Company is acquired, or (iv) in cash. The
Agreement also provides for payment to the Director for his services in
connection with the Strato Acquisition of $375,000 (the "Consulting Fee"). The
Consulting Fee is payable upon the initial public offering and may be payable,
at the option of the Director, in shares of the Company's stock or warrants or
options to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that number of shares of the
common stock (valued at the initial public offering price) which equals
$375,000. At December 31, 1997, accrued expenses included $375,000 due to the
Director. The Letter Agreement also provides for payment of $275,000 (the
"Second Consulting Fee") to the Director for services provided in connection
with a second strategic venture. The Second Consulting Fee is payable upon the
completion of the second strategic venture and is payable in warrants or options
to purchase, at a nominal exercise price, that number of shares of the Company's
stock (valued at the initial public offering price) which equals $250,000. As of
December 31, 1997, no amounts have been earned by the Director relating to the
Second Consulting Fee. Both Consulting Fees are to be in lieu of and not in
addition to the General Consulting Fee.

During 1997, an affiliate of one of the Directors of the Company provided
consulting services to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 1997, the
Company incurred expense related to these services in the amount of $235,699.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Concurrent with the acquisition of Neostar, on October 24, 1995, the
Company entered into non-compete and consulting agreements with four previous
shareholders of Neostar. The agreements are non-interest bearing and have been
recorded at their net present values based on an imputed interest rate of 10%.

Payment requirements are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $ 354,756
1999........................................................ 331,200
2000........................................................ 331,200
2001........................................................ 567,741
2002........................................................ 833,574
----------
Total payments.............................................. 2,418,471
Less amounts representing interest.......................... (618,884)
----------
Present value of payments under non-compete and consulting
agreements................................................ $1,799,587
==========
</TABLE>

F-16
<PAGE> 75
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

The Company leases its facility and certain equipment under operating lease
agreements expiring in various years through 2009. Rent expense under various
operating leases was approximately $25,000, $117,000 and $85,000 during December
31, 1995, 1996 and 1997, respectively. Minimum future rental payments under
operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year are as follows:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
1998........................................................ $ 108,000
1999........................................................ 108,000
2000........................................................ 108,000
2001........................................................ 108,000
2002........................................................ 108,000
Thereafter.................................................. 704,666
----------
$1,244,666
==========
</TABLE>

The Company is subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental
laws and regulations. Management believes that the Company is in material
compliance with such laws and regulations and that potential environmental
liabilities, if any, are not material to the consolidated financial statements.

In connection with the 1995 acquisition of Neostar discussed in Note 13,
the Company assumed a license agreement with an individual (the "Licensor") for
the right to manufacture and sell dual lumen fistula needles, dual lumen
over-the-needle catheters, and dual lumen chronic and acute catheters, covered
by the Licensor's patents or derived from the Licensor's confidential
information. Payments under the agreement vary, depending upon the purchaser,
and range from 9% to 15% of Neostar's net sales of such licensed products. Such
payments shall continue until the expiration date of each corresponding Licensed
Patent Right covering each product under the agreement. Payments under this
license agreement totaled approximately $51,000, $241,000 and $249,000 in 1995,
1996 and 1997, respectively.

On February 17, 1993, the Company entered into a supply agreement (the
"Supply Agreement") with one of its vascular access port manufacturers (the
"Manufacturer") for the development and supply of certain vascular access port
products. On January 17, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with the
Manufacturer to amend the original Supply Agreement and to transfer the
manufacture of the ports to the Company. The new agreement requires the Company
to pay the Manufacturer $680,000 in connection with the transfer of the
manufacturing process. This amount is to cover certain manufacturing equipment,
documentation of the manufacturing process, and training of the Company's
personnel by the Manufacturer. The amount is to be paid based upon ports
produced by the Company over a period of time, with the total balance to be paid
by September 30, 1998. The total amount can be reduced based on additional
purchases of ports from the Manufacturer after September 30, 1997.

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following represent noncash investing and financing activities for the
years ended December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Capital lease obligations for property and equipment... $ -- $114,158 $ --
Short-term debt issued for certain insurance
coverage............................................. 95,512 111,707 161,719
Increase to goodwill................................... -- 52,169 --
Note issued for trade-in of auto....................... -- -- 11,641
Increase to property and equipment..................... -- -- 101,460
Discount recorded on credit facility................... -- -- 3,000,000
Contributed services................................... 215,000 320,000 365,000
</TABLE>

F-17
<PAGE> 76
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

13. ACQUISITIONS

On October 24, 1995, Horizon Acquisition Corp. ("Horizon"), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, acquired the net assets of Neostar for $1,559,672 in
cash and a note of $1,356,148, net of a discount of $1,104,869, payable over a
seven-year period. The acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to
the assets and liabilities of Neostar based on their estimated fair values at
the date of acquisition. Goodwill of $1,735,754 was recorded and is being
amortized over 15 years. Operating results of Neostar since October 24, 1995 are
included in the Company's consolidated financial statements.

On June 20, 1997, the Company, together with Arrow International, Inc.
("Arrow"), an unrelated entity, entered into a joint purchase agreement (the
"Stock Purchase Agreement") to acquire all of the stock of Strato, located in
Norwood, Massachusetts, for a purchase price of $21,250,000 plus the assumption
by the Company and Arrow of certain of Strato's trade debts and accrued
expenses. Strato produces and distributes vascular access products (the "Port
Business") and implantable infusion pump products (the "Pump Business"). Under
the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired 275,294 shares of Strato's
stock for $19,500,000, and Arrow acquired 24,706 shares of Strato's stock (the
"Arrow Shares") for $1,750,000.

The transaction was completed on July 15, 1997. On that date, the Company
and Arrow entered into an asset purchase and stock redemption agreement (the
"Arrow Agreement") wherein the Company, as beneficial owner of a majority of the
stock of Strato, sold the Pump Business and its related assets to Arrow in
exchange for the Arrow Shares and Arrow's assumption of certain liabilities of
Strato. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed under the Stock Purchase
Agreement were divided between the Company and Arrow as outlined in the Arrow
Agreement.

The Company has accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method of
accounting. Goodwill of $11,548,033 was recorded and is being amortized over
thirty years.

The estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in each
of the acquisitions is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEOSTAR STRATO
---------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Cash........................................................ $ 27,685 $ --
Accounts receivable, net.................................... 295,707 1,813,863
Inventories................................................. 657,786 4,434,204
Other current assets........................................ 59,335 101,775
Property and equipment...................................... 323,413 758,356
Intangibles and other assets................................ 1,739,756 13,183,033
Deferred income tax asset................................... -- 734,082
Accounts payable and accrued expenses....................... (187,862) (1,525,313)
---------- -----------
Purchase price.................................... $2,915,820 $19,500,000
========== ===========
</TABLE>

The following unaudited pro forma summary combines the results of
operations of the Company with the acquisition of the Port Business of Strato as
if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 1996. Certain adjustments,
including interest expense on the acquisition debt, amortization of intangible
assets, removal of the non-recurring accretion of the value of put warrant
repurchase obligation and income tax effects, have been made to reflect the
impact of the purchase transactions. These pro forma results have been prepared
for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what would
have occurred had the

F-18
<PAGE> 77
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

acquisition been made at the beginning of the respective fiscal years, or of
results which may occur in the future.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1996 1997
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Sales....................................................... $ 21,661 $ 22,818
Net loss.................................................... (628) (870)
Loss per share -- basic and diluted......................... (0.07) (0.09)
</TABLE>

Pro forma earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1997
is calculated by dividing pro forma net income by the weighted average shares
outstanding of 9,419,089 and 9,419,458, respectively.

14. LOSS PER SHARE

The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 128 "Earnings Per Share" ("FASB 128") in 1997. FASB 128 requires
the presentation of earnings (loss) per share computed as "basic" and "diluted".
There are no differences in the basic and diluted computations for the periods
presented herein. A reconciliation of the denominator is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1996 1997
--------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding................... 9,143,766 9,419,089 9,419,458
Shares assumed issued under the warrants (Note 8)..... -- -- --
Antidilution features of certain shareholders (Note
8).................................................. -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Weighted average shares outstanding used to compute
loss per share...................................... 9,143,766 9,419,089 9,419,458
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

The Company had warrants to purchase common stock outstanding in 1995, 1996
and 1997. Inclusion of the warrants in 1995 and 1996 in weighted average shares
outstanding for diluted EPS would be anti-dilutive due to losses in those years.
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 1997 (see Notes 6 and 8) are convertible to
an estimated 765,000 shares (335,762 on a weighted average basis). Additionally,
if included in the diluted EPS calculation, $8,000,000 would be added to the
numerator as expenses recorded in 1997 associated with the warrants. These
calculations would also result in an anti-dilutive effect and, therefore, are
excluded. A shareholder has anti-dilutive rights which call for a constant 1.99%
ownership. Should such warrant be exercised, shares would also be issued to
maintain this 1.99% ownership percentage. This feature is also anti-dilutive for
all years presented.

15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments consisted of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1996 DECEMBER 31, 1997
----------------------- -------------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
AMOUNT VALUE AMOUNT VALUE
---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Accounts receivable -- trade, net..... $ 959,093 $ 959,093 $ 3,720,031 $ 3,720,031
Accounts payable...................... 685,795 685,795 1,726,395 1,726,395
Long-term debt and non-compete
payable............................. 6,879,889 7,055,206 27,729,874 27,864,642
Put warrant repurchase obligation..... -- -- 11,000,000 11,000,000
</TABLE>

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash
and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair
value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial
instruments. The carrying amounts reported for the credit facility and a portion
of the other long-term debt approximate fair value because the underlying
instruments are at variable interest rates which reprice frequently. Fair value
for the fixed rate long term debt was estimated using either quoted market
prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates offered to the
Company for debt with similar maturities. The

F-19
<PAGE> 78
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

Acquisition Note and the non-compete payable have been recorded at fair value
using either the market prices for the same or similar issues or the current
rates offered to the Company for debt with similar maturities.

16. ANTICIPATED INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING

The Company's Board of Directors has authorized management to pursue an
initial public offering of the Company's common stock. In anticipation of an
initial public offering, the Company's board of directors increased the number
of authorized common shares to 50,000,000 and preferred shares to 5,000,000 and
effected an approximate 92.42-for-one stock split. The par value of the common
stock remains unchanged. This transaction has been recorded herein in the year
ended December 31, 1997. All share and per share amounts have been restated
retroactively herein to reflect the stock split except with respect to periods
presented in the consolidated statements of shareholders' deficit prior to
December 31, 1997.

F-20
<PAGE> 79

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors
Strato/Infusaid Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Strato/Infusaid Inc.
(the "Company") as of December 31, 1995, 1996, and June 30, 1997, and the
related statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1997.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Strato/Infusaid Inc. as of
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June 30, 1997, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six
months ended June 30, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Birmingham, Alabama
September 15, 1997, except
for June 30, 1997 data, as to
which the date is March 21, 1998

F-21
<PAGE> 80

STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1996 AND JUNE 30, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Accounts receivable -- trade, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $150,388, $102,442 and $111,672
in 1995, 1996, and 1997, respectively................ $ 3,203,878 $ 2,923,899 $ 2,790,470
Inventories............................................ 9,125,346 9,979,985 10,108,995
Prepaid expenses and other assets...................... 179,295 244,580 576,940
Deferred taxes......................................... 2,717,658 1,757,460 1,799,522
----------- ----------- ------------
Total current assets......................... 15,226,177 14,905,924 15,275,927
Property and equipment, net............................ 3,360,215 2,772,079 2,327,550
Intangible assets, net................................. 8,127,695 7,680,398 7,457,149
Deferred taxes......................................... 471,187 306,685 231,855
----------- ----------- ------------
Total assets................................. $27,185,274 $25,665,086 $ 25,292,481
=========== =========== ============

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Accounts payable....................................... $ 1,152,408 $ 997,147 $ 886,669
Accrued sales returns and allowances................... 404,202 404,202 404,202
Accrued wages and benefits............................. 626,236 635,348 580,924
Accrued liabilities.................................... 166,775 188,700 46,394
----------- ----------- ------------
Total liabilities............................ 2,349,621 2,225,397 1,918,189
----------- ----------- ------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Common stock, $.01 par value, 300,000 shares
authorized, issued, and outstanding in 1995 and 1996,
respectively......................................... 3,000 3,000 3,000
Additional paid-in capital............................. 64,610,571 64,610,571 64,610,571
Advances from parent (Note 10)......................... 41,550,605 45,112,878 47,441,773
Accumulated deficit.................................... (81,328,523) (86,286,760) (88,681,052)
----------- ----------- ------------
Total shareholder's equity................... 24,835,653 23,439,689 23,374,292
----------- ----------- ------------
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity... $27,185,274 $25,665,086 $ 25,292,481
=========== =========== ============
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-22
<PAGE> 81

STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1996 AND THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
---------------------------- ----------------------------
1995 1996 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales........................... $21,225,142 $19,595,940 $ 9,327,908 $ 8,070,086
Cost of sales................... 8,840,877 9,257,372 4,239,099 3,531,525
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Gross profit.......... 12,384,265 10,338,568 5,088,809 4,538,561
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Selling, general, and
administrative expenses....... 10,433,801 9,758,359 4,669,680 2,980,386
Selling, general, and
administrative
expenses -- related party..... 2,662,000 2,825,000 1,565,000 2,405,000
Research and development
expenses...................... 7,522,000 5,797,000 2,915,000 3,083,000
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total operating
expenses............ 20,617,801 18,380,359 9,149,680 8,468,386
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Operating loss........ (8,233,536) (8,041,791) (4,060,871) (3,929,825)
Other income (expenses), net.... (359,471) (40,813) 8,210 29,900
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Loss before income tax
benefit............. (8,593,007) (8,082,604) (4,052,661) (3,899,925)
Income tax benefit.............. 3,334,815 3,124,367 1,569,870 1,505,633
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss.............. $(5,258,192) $(4,958,237) $(2,482,791) $(2,394,292)
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-23
<PAGE> 82

STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1996 AND THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONAL ADVANCES
NUMBER OF COMMON PAID-IN FROM ACCUMULATED
SHARES STOCK CAPITAL PARENT DEFICIT TOTAL
--------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance, December 31, 1994........ 300,000 $3,000 $64,610,571 $37,545,040 $(76,070,331) $26,088,280
Net advances from parent.......... 4,005,565 4,005,565
Net loss.......................... (5,258,192) (5,258,192)
------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance, December 31, 1995........ 300,000 3,000 64,610,571 41,550,605 (81,328,523) 24,835,653
Net advances from parent.......... 3,562,273 3,562,273
Net loss.......................... (4,958,237) (4,958,237)
------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance, December 31, 1996........ 300,000 3,000 64,610,571 45,112,878 (86,286,760) 23,439,689
Net advances from parent.......... 2,328,895 2,328,895
Net loss.......................... (2,394,292) (2,394,292)
------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------ -----------
Balance, June 30, 1997............ 300,000 $3,000 $64,610,571 $47,441,773 $(88,681,052) $23,374,292
======= ====== =========== =========== ============ ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-24
<PAGE> 83

STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1996 AND THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1996 AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
------------------------- -------------------------
1995 1996 1996 1997
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss.................................. $(5,258,192) $(4,958,237) $(2,482,791) $(2,394,292)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation........................... 816,945 816,753 373,373 484,090
Amortization........................... 447,297 447,297 223,249 223,249
Provision for doubtful accounts........ 9,230 20,000 -- --
Deferred income taxes.................. 965,555 1,124,700 433,649 32,768
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net
Accounts receivable -- trade......... 640,291 259,979 101,996 133,429
Inventories.......................... (390,309) (854,639) (917,544) (129,010)
Prepaid expenses and other assets.... 157,037 (65,285) 47,083 (332,360)
Accounts payable..................... (58,217) (155,261) 46,905 (110,478)
Accrued expenses..................... (61,747) 31,037 (11,385) (196,730)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in operating
activities...................... (2,732,110) (3,333,656) (2,185,465) (2,289,334)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures...................... (1,273,455) (228,617) (106,809) (39,561)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing
activities...................... (1,273,455) (228,617) (106,809) (39,561)
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net advances from parent.................. 4,005,565 3,562,273 2,292,274 2,328,895
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing
activities...................... 4,005,565 3,562,273 2,292,274 2,328,895
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents..................... -- -- -- --
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
year...................................... -- -- -- --
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year...... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
=========== =========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-25
<PAGE> 84

STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. FORMATION AND PRESENTATION

Strato/Infusaid, Inc. (the "Company") produces implantable infusion pumps
and vascular access products such as ports and catheters which are primarily
used in chemotherapy and long-term pain management. The Company was formed from
the merger of Strato Medical Products, Inc. ("Strato") and Infusaid, Inc.
("Infusaid") in January 1994 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
("Pfizer"). As discussed in Note 10, the Company was sold in July 1997.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Revenue Recognition -- The Company records sales upon shipment of the
related product, net of any discounts.

Cash Management Program -- The Company participates in a consolidated cash
management program with its parent. The program provides for the daily
replenishment of major bank accounts for check clearing requirements.
Accordingly, the Company maintains a cash balance of zero per books and
outstanding checks that had not been paid by the banks are included in the
intercompany account.

Inventories -- Implantable infusion pumps and vascular access products such
as ports and catheters are valued at the lower of average cost or market.

Property and Equipment -- Property and equipment are carried at cost, less
accumulated depreciation, and include expenditures that substantially increase
the useful lives of existing assets. Maintenance, repairs, and minor renovations
are charged to expense as incurred. Upon sale, retirement, or other disposition
of these assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from
the respective accounts, and any gain or loss on the disposition is included in
net loss.

The Company provides for depreciation of property and equipment using
primarily the straight-line method designed to depreciate costs over estimated
useful lives as shown below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ESTIMATED
USEFUL LIFE
------------
<S> <C>
Item:
Machinery and equipment................................... 8 - 12 years
Office equipment.......................................... 3 - 12 years
</TABLE>

Intangible Assets -- Goodwill, the excess of the purchase price over the
fair value of the net assets acquired in Pfizer's purchase of Strato, is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. Patents are being amortized on
a straight-line basis over the lives of the related patents, which are primarily
13.5 years.

Long-Lived Assets -- The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in business circumstances occur that indicate that
the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses
the recoverability of long-lived assets held and to be used and measures the
impairment, if any, based on a fair value approach. The Company had no such
impairments for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months
ended June 30, 1997, respectively.

Research and Development -- Research and development costs are charged to
expense as incurred and were $7,522,000, $5,797,000 and $3,083,000 for the years
ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the six months ended June 30, 1997,
respectively.

Income Taxes -- The Company is included in the consolidated federal tax
return of its parent, Pfizer. The consolidated income taxes are allocated to the
Company under an agreement with its parent based on its contribution to the
consolidated tax provision or benefit. Current federal tax provisions and
benefits are settled through the intercompany account. The current federal tax
benefits of $3,334,815, $3,124,367, and $1,505,633

F-26
<PAGE> 85
STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

were used to reduce the advances from parent in 1995 and 1996, and the six
months ended June 30, 1997, respectively.

The Company accounts for income taxes under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires
recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or
tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are
determined based on the differences between the financial statement basis and
the tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Such temporary
differences are principally related to using different methods of depreciating
property and equipment and amortizing intangible assets for book and tax
purposes.

Financial Instruments -- The carrying amounts reported in the balance
sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable
approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these
financial instruments.

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements -- The unaudited statements of
operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 1996, in the opinion
of management, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial
statements and include all significant adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the results of the
interim period.

3. INVENTORIES

A summary of inventories at December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June 30, 1997 is
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Raw materials................................... $ 5,298,628 $ 5,391,001 $ 4,801,413
Work in process................................. 1,892,401 2,263,043 2,865,609
Finished goods.................................. 4,674,427 5,276,378 5,466,523
----------- ----------- -----------
11,865,456 12,930,422 13,133,545
Less inventory reserves......................... (2,740,110) (2,950,437) (3,024,550)
----------- ----------- -----------
$ 9,125,346 $ 9,979,985 $10,108,995
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of property and equipment at December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June
30, 1997 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Machinery and equipment......................... $ 3,839,629 $ 3,981,367 $ 2,511,928
Office equipment................................ 5,129,274 5,216,153 3,270,625
----------- ----------- -----------
8,968,903 9,197,520 5,782,553
Less accumulated depreciation................... (5,608,688) (6,425,441) (3,455,003)
----------- ----------- -----------
$ 3,360,215 $ 2,772,079 $ 2,327,550
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

F-27
<PAGE> 86
STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

A summary of intangible assets at December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June 30,
1997 is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Goodwill........................................ $ 5,820,000 $ 5,820,000 $ 5,820,000
Patents......................................... 3,915,000 3,915,000 3,915,000
----------- ----------- -----------
9,735,000 9,735,000 9,735,000
Less accumulated amortization................... (1,607,305) (2,054,602) (2,277,851)
----------- ----------- -----------
$ 8,127,695 $ 7,680,398 $ 7,457,149
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

6. INCOME TAXES

The benefit (provision) for income taxes for the years ended December 31,
1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1997 consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current......................................... $ 4,300,370 $ 4,249,067 $ 1,538,401
Deferred........................................ (965,555) (1,124,700) (32,768)
----------- ----------- -----------
$ 3,334,815 $ 3,124,367 $ 1,505,633
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

Temporary differences which give rise to a significant portion of deferred
tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 1995 and 1996 and June 30, 1997 are
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts.................... $ 172,129 $ 151,972 $ 216,875
Inventory reserves................................. 1,151,942 1,254,454 1,271,520
Intangible assets.................................. 429,572 195,830 78,960
Property and equipment............................. 41,615 110,855 152,895
Accrued liabilities and other...................... 1,393,587 351,034 311,127
---------- ---------- ----------
$3,188,845 $2,064,145 $2,031,377
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

No valuation allowance was recorded by the Company against the net deferred
tax asset at December 31, 1995 or 1996 or June 30, 1997 as the Company is
compensated for the use of its net operating losses by Pfizer with a direct
reduction to the intercompany payable. Pfizer management feels that it is more
likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through its
future consolidated taxable income.

The benefit for income taxes differs from the amount that would be computed
by applying the federal statutory rate of 34% to pre-tax earnings for the years
ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and for the six months ended June 30, 1997 as
indicated below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax benefit at the statutory federal income
tax rate......................................... $2,921,622 $2,748,085 $1,325,975
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Non-deductible meals and entertainment expense... (33,549) (38,893) (19,446)
Non-deductible amortization of goodwill.......... (53,481) (53,481) (26,740)
State tax benefit................................ 500,223 468,656 225,844
---------- ---------- ----------
$3,334,815 $3,124,367 $1,505,633
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

F-28
<PAGE> 87
STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

As discussed in Note 2, income taxes are allocated to the Company under an
agreement with its parent based on its contribution to the consolidated
provision or benefit. Current tax provisions are settled through the
intercompany account. The following unaudited pro forma information sets forth
the income tax benefit and net loss of the Company calculated on a separate
company basis for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months
ended June 30, 1997:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax benefit.............................. -- -- --
=========== =========== ===========
Net loss........................................ $(8,593,007) $ 8,082,604 $(3,899,925)
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>

Additionally, on a separate company basis the above net deferred tax assets
would not be deemed recoverable which would result in an increase in accumulated
deficit of $3,188,845, $2,064,145 and $2,031,377 in 1995, 1996 and 1997,
respectively.

7. DEFINED BENEFIT AND CONTRIBUTION PLANS

The Company's employees participate in the Pfizer Retirement Annuity Plan
sponsored by Pfizer. Benefits under the plan are generally based on years of
service and employee career earnings. Participants become fully vested after
five years of employment. The Company recognized pension expense related to this
plan of approximately $212,000, $800, and $29,000 for the years ended December
31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1997, respectively.

In addition, the Company's employees are eligible to participate in a
defined contribution 401(k) plan maintained by Pfizer. Company matching
contributions to the plan are dollar for dollar for the first 2% of employee
contributions and 50% for the next 4% of employee contributions. Contribution
expense recognized by the Company under this plan totaled approximately
$267,000, $282,000, and $84,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996
and the six months ended June 30, 1997, respectively.

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company leases office and equipment under operating lease agreements
expiring in various years through 1999. Rent expense under various operating
leases was approximately $635,000, $518,000, and $247,000 for the years ended
December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended June 30, 1997, respectively.
Approximate minimum future rental payments under operating leases with remaining
terms in excess of one year are as follows:

The Company is involved in a number of claims and litigation, including
product liability claims and litigation considered normal in the nature of its
business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with
respect to these actions will not materially affect the financial position or
results of operations of the Company.

The Company participates in Pfizer's consolidated self-insured risk
management program. Pfizer charges the Company, on a monthly basis, for claims
expense incurred on the Company's behalf including an amount for an estimate of
claims incurred but not reported.

Effective January 1, 1995, the Company entered into a license agreement
with an individual (the Licensor) for the right to manufacture and sell certain
products covered by the Licensor's patents or derived from the Licensor's
confidential information agreement. Payments under the agreement vary, depending
upon

F-29
<PAGE> 88
STRATO/INFUSAID INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

the purchaser, and range from 5% to 15% of the Company's net sales of the
covered products. Such payments shall continue until the expiration date of each
corresponding Licensed Patent Right covering each product under the agreement.
Payments under this license agreement totaled approximately $38,600, $4,900, and
$5,800 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and the six months ended
June 30, 1997, respectively.

9. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As previously noted, the Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer. As
such, Pfizer provides certain administrative services to the Company including
legal services, insurance administration, corporate tax preparation and
submission, regulatory consulting, employee benefits administration, and payroll
data processing. Allocated costs associated with these services are charged
directly to the Company by Pfizer and are reflected in the Company's financial
statements. Such costs have been allocated to the Company by Pfizer based on the
Company's size and its historical results with regard to the related expense
categories. It is management's opinion that these allocated costs, while not
unreasonable, may not be indicative of the costs that would have been incurred
by the Company if the Company had performed these functions or received such
services as a stand-alone entity. The approximate amounts of the material
related party transactions for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996 and
the six months ended June 30, 1997 are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------ JUNE 30,
1995 1996 1997
---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Product liability and business insurance....... $ 417,000 $1,020,000 $ 682,000
Group health insurance......................... 840,000 662,000 336,000
Legal expense.................................. 1,405,000 1,143,000 1,387,000
---------- ---------- ----------
$2,662,000 $2,825,000 $2,405,000
========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT -- SALE OF THE COMPANY

On July 15, 1997, Horizon Medical Products, Inc. ("Horizon") and Arrow
International, Inc. ("Arrow"), two unrelated parties, completed a joint purchase
agreement to acquire all of the stock of the Company from Pfizer for a purchase
price of $21,250,000 plus the assumption by Horizon and Arrow of certain of the
Company's trade debts and accrued expenses. The advances from parent were
forgiven by Pfizer and converted to additional paid-in capital prior to the sale
of the Company.

F-30
<PAGE> 89

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INTRODUCTION

The accompanying Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements reflect the consolidated financial position of Horizon Medical
Products, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 1997 and the consolidated
results of its operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 after giving pro
forma effect to the Consolidated Statement of Operations for (i) the purchase of
the port business of Strato/Infusaid Inc. (the "Strato/Infusaid Acquisition")
and (ii) the initial public offering of Common Stock by the Company (the
"Offering") and the application of the net proceeds thereof as though they
occurred January 1, 1997 and to the Consolidated Balance Sheet after giving
effect to the Offering and application of the net proceeds thereof as though it
occurred December 31, 1997. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements are qualified in their entirety by, and should be read in
conjunction with, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" and the respective historical financial statements of
the Company and Strato/Infusaid Inc. and related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this Prospectus. The unaudited pro forma information does not
purport to be indicative of actual results that would have been achieved or the
financial position of the Company had the Strato/Infusaid Acquisition and
Offering actually been completed as of the dates indicated in the accompanying
notes thereto nor which may be achieved in the future.

F-31
<PAGE> 90

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STRATO
JANUARY 1, 1997
THROUGH PRO FORMA OFFERING PRO FORMA
COMPANY JULY 15, 1997(A) ADJUSTMENTS PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS AS ADJUSTED
--------- ----------------- ----------- --------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales................... $ 15,798 $7,020 $ -- $ 22,818 $ -- $ 22,818
Cost of goods sold.......... 6,273 2,687 (300)(b) 8,660 -- 8,660
--------- ------ ------- --------- ------- -----------
Gross profit................ 9,525 4,333 300 14,158 -- 14,158
Selling, general and 124(c)
administrative expenses... 6,476 2,927 (1,506)(d) 8,021 90(e) 8,111
--------- ------ ------- --------- ------- -----------
Operating income... 3,049 1,406 1,682 6,137 (90) 6,047
Interest income (expense)... (3,971) -- (1,994)(f) (5,965) 6,020(g) 55
Non-recurring accretion of
value of put warrant
repurchase obligation..... (8,000) -- 8,000(h) -- -- --
Other income................ 70 -- -- 70 -- 70
--------- ------ ------- --------- ------- -----------
Income (loss) before income
taxes..................... (8,852) 1,406 7,688 242 5,930 6,172
Income tax expense.......... (320) (622) (170)(i) (1,112) (1,267)(i) (2,379)
--------- ------ ------- --------- ------- -----------
Net income (loss)........... $ (9,172) $ 784 $ 7,518 $ (870) $ 4,663 $ 3,793
========= ====== ======= ========= ======= ===========
Earnings (loss) per share --
basic and diluted......... $ (0.97) $ (0.09)(j) $ 0.30(j)
========= ========= ===========
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
basic and diluted......... 9,419,458 9,419,458(k) 12,800,000(k)
========= ========= ===========
</TABLE>

F-32
<PAGE> 91

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS ADJUSTED
DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMPANY
COMPANY ADJUSTMENTS AS ADJUSTED
-------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents........................... $ 2,894 $ 3,947(1) $ 6,841
Accounts receivable, net............................ 3,720 -- 3,720
Inventories......................................... 5,406 -- 5,406
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........... 367 -- 367
Deferred taxes...................................... 569 -- 569
-------- -------- --------
Total current assets........................ 12,956 3,947 16,903
Property and equipment, net......................... 2,342 2,342
Intangible assets, net.............................. 15,726 (262)(n) 15,464
Deferred taxes...................................... 255 -- 255
Other assets........................................ 298 -- 298
-------- -------- --------
Total assets................................ $ 31,577 $ 3,685 $ 35,262
======== ======== ========

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable.................................... $ 1,726 $ -- $ 1,726
Accrued liabilities................................. 1,682 -- 1,682
Income taxes payable................................ 410 -- 410
Current portion of long-term debt................... 1,960 (1,761)(l) 199
Current portion of payable under non-compete and
consulting agreements............................ 336 (336)(l) --
-------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities................... 6,114 (2,097) 4,017
Long-term debt, net of current portion................ 23,971 (23,928)(l) 43
Payable under non-compete and consulting agreements,
net of current portion.............................. 1,463 (1,463)(l) --
Put warrant repurchase obligation..................... 11,000 (11,000)(m) --
Other liabilities..................................... 179 179
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities........................... 42,727 (38,488) 4,239
-------- -------- --------
Commitments and contingent liabilities
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT):
Preferred stock..................................... -- -- --
Common stock........................................ 9 4(l)(m) 13
Additional paid-in capital.......................... 1,271 9,900(m) 43,768
32,597(l)

Shareholders' notes receivable...................... (399) -- (399)
1,100(m)
Accumulated deficit................................. (12,031) (1,428)(n) (12,359)
-------- -------- --------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)........ (11,150) 42,173 31,023
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
(deficit)................................. $ 31,577 $ 3,685 $ 35,262
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

F-33
<PAGE> 92

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS)

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 1997 gives effect to the consolidated results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 1997 as if the Strato/Infusaid
Acquisition and the Offering occurred on January 1, 1997. The unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 1997 as if the Offering occurred at December 31,
1997.

PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, ARE AS FOLLOWS:

(a) Represents the historical operating results of the port business
of Strato for the period January 1, 1997 through the acquisition
date of July 15, 1997. The pump business of Strato, which was sold
immediately after the acquisition, is excluded. The pump business
had net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative
expenses and loss before income tax for the period of $2,355,
$587, $7,478 and $6,891, respectively.

(b) Cost of goods sold has been reduced to eliminate overhead cost
allocations which have not been incurred on an ongoing basis
($300).

(c) Reflects the net increase in amortization ($124) of the cost over
fair value of net assets acquired over a period of 30 years.

(d) Selling, general and administrative expenses have been reduced to
eliminate salaries and related benefits from sales personnel
($1,100) and administrative personnel ($406) not retained
following the acquisition.

(e) The Chief Executive Officer and the President of the Company will
begin to receive compensation after completion of the Offering.
This reflects the increase in expected compensation over amounts
recorded in the historical financials associated with contributed
services.

(f) Reflects the increase in interest expense ($1,994) resulting from
additional debt of $23,500 with variable interest at rates of 9.8%
on $21,500 during the period and to 10.8% on $2,000 during the
period associated with the financing of the Strato/Infusaid
Acquisition and amortization of related debt issue costs. A change
in interest rate of 1/8% would have a $29 impact.

(g) Reflects the reduction of interest expense ($6,020) resulting from
the application of the net proceeds of this Offering to repay debt
of the Company.

(h) Reflects the removal of the non-recurring accretion of the value
of put warrant repurchase obligation associated with the Company's
credit facility ($8,000). See Notes 6 and 8 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements of the Company.

(i) Reflects applicable income tax effects of adjustments.

(j) Earnings (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing pro
forma and as adjusted net income by weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Such pro forma and as adjusted net
income (loss) reflects the impact of the adjustments above.

(k) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding is calculated
based upon the relevant weighted average shares outstanding
assuming anti-dilution features which exist and assuming an
offering of 2,600,000 shares by the Company for As Adjusted.

PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997, ARE AS FOLLOWS:

(l) Reflects receipt and application of the net proceeds to the
Company, including repayment of indebtedness, from the sale of common stock
in this Offering.

F-34
<PAGE> 93
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
(IN THOUSANDS)

(m) Reflects the rescission of the put obligation associated with the
NationsCredit warrant and the anticipated exercise of the warrant.

(n) The use of net proceeds of the Offering to repay outstanding
indebtedness will result in an immediate write-off of $1,428 representing
unamortized debt issue costs existing at December 31, 1997.

F-35
<PAGE> 94

------------------------------------------------------

NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY
INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATION NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS AND,
IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATION MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS
HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY OR ANY UNDERWRITER. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES
NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY OF THE
SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY IN ANY JURISDICTION TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS
UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS
PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE
ANY IMPLICATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF ANY TIME
SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF
THE COMPANY SINCE SUCH DATE.
------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Prospectus Summary.................... 3
Risk Factors.......................... 7
Use of Proceeds....................... 15
Dividend Policy....................... 15
Capitalization........................ 16
Dilution.............................. 17
Selected Financial Data............... 18
Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations....................... 20
Business.............................. 26
Management............................ 39
Certain Transactions.................. 43
Principal and Selling Shareholders.... 46
Description of Capital Stock.......... 48
Shares Eligible for Future Sale....... 51
Underwriting.......................... 52
Certain U.S. Federal Tax
Considerations for Non-U.S. Holders
of Common Stock..................... 53
Notice to Canadian Residents.......... 56
Legal Matters......................... 57
Experts............................... 57
Index to Financial Statements......... F-1
</TABLE>

------------------
UNTIL , 1998 (25 DAYS AFTER THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE OFFERING),
ALL DEALERS EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN THE SHARES, WHETHER OR NOT PARTICIPATING
IN THIS DISTRIBUTION, MAY BE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS. THIS IS IN
ADDITION TO THE OBLIGATION OF DEALERS TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS WHEN ACTING AS
UNDERWRITERS AND WITH RESPECT TO THEIR UNSOLD ALLOTMENTS OR SUBSCRIPTIONS.

======================================================

HORIZON MEDICAL
PRODUCTS, INC.

(HORIZON MEDICAL LOGO)

3,473,000 Shares
Common Stock
($.001 par value)

PROSPECTUS

CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON

BANCAMERICA ROBERTSON STEPHENS

NATIONSBANC MONTGOMERY
SECURITIES LLC

------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE> 95

PART II.

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

The following table sets forth an itemized statement of certain costs and
expenses incurred in connection with the issuance and distribution of the
securities being registered:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee......... $ 17,700
NASD filing fee............................................. 6,000
Nasdaq National Market listing fee.......................... 84,875
Blue Sky fees and expenses (including counsel fees)......... 12,500
Printing and engraving expenses............................. 243,175
Legal fees and expenses..................................... 360,000
Accounting fees and expenses................................ 300,000
Registrar and Transfer Agent's fees and expenses............ 7,750
Miscellaneous............................................... 218,000
----------
Total............................................. $1,250,000
==========
</TABLE>

All amounts except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee,
the NASD filing fee and Nasdaq National Market listing fee are estimated. The
Company intends to pay all expenses of registration with respect to shares being
sold by the Selling Shareholders hereunder, with the exception of underwriting
discounts and commissions.

ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

The Georgia Code permits a corporation to eliminate or limit the personal
liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for monetary
damages for breach of duty of care or other duty as a director, provided that no
provisions shall eliminate or limit the liability of a director.

The Company's Bylaws also provide that the Company shall indemnify any
person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (including any action by or in the
right of the Company), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a
director or officer of the Company, or is or was serving at the request of the
Company as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including reasonable
attorney's fees), judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or
proceeding, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company
(and with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, if such person had no
reasonable cause to believe such person's conduct was unlawful), to the maximum
extent permitted by, and in the manner provided by, the Georgia Code. In
addition, the Bylaws provide that the Company will advance to its directors or
officers reasonable expenses of any such proceeding.

Notwithstanding any provision of the Company's Articles and Bylaws to the
contrary, the Georgia Code provides that the Company shall not indemnify a
director or officer for any liability incurred in a proceeding in which the
director or officer is adjudged liable to the Company or is subjected to
injunctive relief in favor of the Company: (i) for any appropriation, in
violation of his duties, of any business opportunity of the Company; (ii) for
acts or omissions which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law; (iii) for unlawful corporate distributions; or (iv) for any transaction
from which the director or officer received an improper personal benefit.

The Company has purchased insurance with respect to, among other things,
any liabilities that may accrue under the statutory provisions referred to
above.

II-1
<PAGE> 96

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
Registration Statement, the Underwriters have agreed to indemnify the directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Company against certain civil
liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the Offering, including
certain liabilities under the Securities Act.

ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

On March 17, 1995, the Company issued to Cordova 933,451 shares of the
Company's Class A Common Stock (the "Cordova Shares") for an aggregate $10.00,
pursuant to the exercise by Cordova of a warrant (the "Cordova Warrant"). The
Company granted the Cordova Warrant to Cordova in 1994 in connection with a $1.0
million loan made to the Company by Cordova. The Cordova Warrant and Cordova
Shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act (the "Section 4(2) Exemption").

On September 25, 1995, in connection with a $1.5 million loan to the
Company from Sirrom, the Company issued to Sirrom a warrant (the "Sirrom
Warrant") for the purchase of 876,705 shares of the Company's Class A Common
Stock. On July 15, 1997, the Company redeemed the Sirrom Warrant in full. The
Sirrom Warrant was issued pursuant to the Section 4(2) Exemption.

On December 15, 1995, the Company issued 83,179 shares of Class A Common
Stock to Roddy J.H. Clark, a former officer of the Company for an aggregate
$15.00. The shares were issued to Mr. Clark pursuant to the exercise of Mr.
Clark's rights under a Stock Warrant Agreement dated May 1, 1993 between the
Company and Mr. Clark. The issuance to Mr. Clark was made under the Section 4(2)
Exemption.

On March 19, 1996 and in April 1998 Cordova exercised certain anti-dilution
rights relating to the Cordova Warrant (and the shares issued pursuant thereto)
to purchase 1,756 shares and 15,550 shares, respectively, of the Company's Class
A Common Stock for $.001 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $17.31.
The issuances to Cordova were made pursuant to the Section 4(2) Exemption.

Pursuant to the SAR Plan, from June 1995 through November 1997, the Company
granted an aggregate 124,000 SARs to eligible employees and eligible sales
representatives based on their achievement of certain performance targets. At
April 9, 1998, 99,600 SARs were outstanding. Subject to consummation of the
Offering, (i) all outstanding SARs will be cancelled, (ii) the options to
purchase an aggregate 99,600 shares of Common Stock under the Stock Incentive
Plan will be granted to holders of SARs who are still employed by the Company
upon consummation of the Offering (i.e., the SAR Conversion Options) and (iii)
cash compensation equal to one dollar will be paid for each SAR held by holders
of SARs who are not employed by the Company upon consummation of the Offering.
The SAR Conversion Options will be exercisable, in increments of 25% per year
over four years, commencing on the first anniversary of the option grant date,
at an exercise price per share equal to the initial public offering price. The
foregoing issuances will be made in reliance on Rule 701 promulgated under the
Securities Act (the "Rule 701 Exemption").

The Company will grant under the Stock Incentive Plan, subject to
consummation of the Offering, options to purchase an aggregate of (i) 40,000
shares of Common Stock to Outside Directors (i.e., the Outside Directors'
Options) and (ii) 10,000 shares of Common Stock to J. Ronald Hager, an executive
officer of the Company (i.e., the Executive's Options). The Company intends to
rely on the Rule 701 Exemption for such issuances.

On July 15, 1997 the Company issued to NationsCredit a warrant to purchase
765,000 shares of Common Stock in reliance on the Section 4(2) Exemption.
Concurrently with the consummation of the Offering, the Company will issue to
NationsCredit 765,000 shares of Common Stock upon exercise of warrants to
purchase such stock for an aggregate $765. The issuance to NationsCredit will be
made in reliance on the Section 4(2) Exemption.

On March 20, 1998 the Company issued to Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P. a
Warrant to purchase up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to certain
vesting requirements, in reliance on the Section 4(2) Exemption.

II-2
<PAGE> 97

The Company will grant, subject to consummation of the Offering, options to
purchase an aggregate of 10,000 shares of Common Stock to an outside advisor to
the Company (i.e., the Advisor's Options). The Company intends to rely on the
Rule 701 exemption for such issuance.

All of the foregoing issuances were conducted without an underwriter or
placement agent and give effect to an approximate 92.42-for-one stock split to
be effected upon consummation of the Offering.

ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Exhibits:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
- ------- -----------------------
<C> <C> <S>
1.1 -- Form of Underwriting Agreement between the Company and
Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, BancAmerica
Robertson Stephens and NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC
as Representatives of the several underwriters*
3.1 -- Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the
Company
3.2 -- Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company
4.1 -- See Articles II, III, VII and IX of the Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation filed as Exhibit 3.1 and Articles
I, VII, VIII and IX of the Amended and Restated Bylaws filed
as Exhibit 3.2
4.2 -- Specimen Common Stock Certificate
5.1 -- Opinion of King & Spalding (including consent)
10.1 -- Promissory Note dated September 28, 1995 made by Marshall B.
Hunt to the order of the Company in the principal amount of
$77,612.43, as amended by Amendment to Promissory Note dated
September 28, 1996*
10.2 -- Promissory Note dated September 28, 1995 made by William E.
Peterson, Jr. to the order of the Company in the principal
amount of $77,612.43, as amended by Amendment to Promissory
Note dated September 28, 1996*
10.3 -- Promissory Note dated September 28, 1995 made by Roy C.
Mallady, Jr. to the order of the Company in the principal
amount of $77,612.43*
10.4 -- Promissory Note dated October 12, 1995 made by Marshall B.
Hunt to the order of the Company in the principal amount of
$35,000.00, as amended by Amendment to Promissory Note dated
October 12, 1995*
10.5 -- Promissory Note dated October 12, 1995 made by William E.
Peterson, Jr. to the order of the Company in the principal
amount of $35,000.00, as amended by Amendment to Promissory
Note dated October 12, 1995*
10.6 -- Promissory Note dated October 12, 1995 made by Roy C.
Mallady, Jr. to the order of the Company in the principal
amount of $35,000.00, as amended by Amendment to Promissory
Note dated October 12, 1995*
10.7 -- Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated July 15,
1997 in the original principal amount of $1.5 million made
by the Company in favor of NationsCredit Commercial
Corporation with Acknowledgment and Consent of Guarantor*
10.8 -- Credit Agreement dated as of July 15, 1997 among the
Company, the Lenders referred to therein and NationsCredit
Commercial Corporation, as Agent (together with the exhibits
thereto)*
10.9 -- Lease Agreement dated as of July 1, 1996 between The
Development Authority of the City of Manchester and the
Company*
10.10 -- Lease Agreement dated as of August 29, 1997 between The
Development Authority of the City of Manchester and the
Company*
10.11 -- 1998 Stock Incentive Plan*
</TABLE>

II-3
<PAGE> 98

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
- ------- -----------------------
<C> <C> <S>
10.12 -- Management Agreement dated as of January 1, 1995 between the
Company and Cardiac Medical, Inc., together with
Acknowledgment of Termination of Contract with CMI*
10.13 -- Loan Agreement dated as of September 25, 1995 between the
Company and Sirrom Capital Corporation*
10.14 -- Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 1997 among the
Company, Pfizer, Inc., Arrow International, Inc. and
Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc., as amended by Amendment to
Purchase Agreement, dated June 20, 1997*
10.15 -- Asset Purchase and Stock Redemption Agreement dated as of
July 15, 1997 among the Company, Arrow International, Inc.
and Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc.*
10.16 -- Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 24, 1995 by and among
the Company, Horizon Acquisition Corp. and NeoStar Medical
Technologies, Inc.*
10.17 -- Secured Subordinated Note dated October 24, 1995 made by
Horizon Acquisition Corp. to the order of NeoStar Medical
Technologies, Inc. in the principal amount of $2,461,017, as
amended by Amendment to Secured Subordinated Note dated July
31, 1997*
10.18 -- Agreement dated July 31, 1997 by and among Horizon
Acquisition Corp., the Company, NeoStar Holding, Inc.,
Joseph D. Pike, Thomas F. Darden, II, Williams W. Wells and
Lance J. Bronnenkant*
10.19 -- Amendment to Security Agreement dated July 31, 1997 by and
among Horizon Acquisition Corp., NeoStar Holding, Inc.,
Joseph D. Pike, Thomas F. Darden, II, William W. Wells and
Lance J. Bronnenkant*
10.20 -- Letter Agreement dated January 8, 1998 between Arrow
International, Inc. and the Company re: the Company's use of
the Norwood facility*
10.21 -- Agreement dated January 13, 1995 between the Company and ACT
Medical, Inc.*
10.22 -- Horizon Plastic Ports: Term Sheet, dated March 18, 1997*
10.23 -- Letter Agreement 2 dated January 17, 1997 to Supply
Agreement between CarboMedics, Inc. and the Company, dated
February 17, 1993, as amended, Development Agreement, dated
February 17, 1993, by and between CarboMedics, Inc. and the
Company, as amended, and Equity Agreement, dated as of
February 17, 1993, by and between CarboMedics, Inc. and the
Company, as amended, together with Letter Agreement dated
February 17, 1993 between CarboMedics, Inc. and the Company
and the aforesaid Supply, Development and Equity Agreements*
10.24 -- Agreement dated May 8, 1997 between the Company and Robert
Cohen+*
10.25 -- Consulting and Services Agreement dated February 1, 1996
between the Company and Healthcare Alliance, Inc. as
amended*
10.26 -- Second Amended License Agreement dated January 1, 1995
between Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar and NeoStar Medical(R)
Technologies, Inc.+*
10.27 -- License Agreement dated July 1995 between Dr. Sakharam D.
Mahurkar and Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc.+*
10.28 -- Additional License Agreement dated January 1, 1997 between
Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar and the Company+*
10.29 -- Atlanta Office Purchase Agreement
10.30 -- Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 1998 between
Marshall B. Hunt and the Company
10.31 -- Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 1998 between
William E. Peterson, Jr. and the Company
10.32 -- Premier Warrant*
</TABLE>

II-4
<PAGE> 99

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
- ------- -----------------------
<C> <C> <S>
10.33 -- Premier Group Purchasing Agreement+*
10.34 -- Security Agreement dated as of September 25, 1995 between
Sirrom Capital Corporation and the Company*
21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Company*
23.1 -- Consent of King & Spalding (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2 -- Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
24. -- Power of Attorney*
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule (for SEC filing purposes only)
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Previously filed.
** To be filed by amendment.

+ Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to portions of this
exhibit.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules:

The following financial statement schedule is furnished herewith:

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31,
1995, 1996 and 1997.

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulation of the Commission are not required under the related
instructions or are not applicable, and therefore have been omitted.

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS

The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters
at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement, certificates in such
denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to
permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

Insofar as indemnification by the Registrant for liabilities arising under
the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered hereunder, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel
the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.

The Registrant hereby undertakes that:

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of
this Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a
form of prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or
(4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this
Registration Statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall
be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities
offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be
deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-5
<PAGE> 100

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant
certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the
requirements for filing on Form S-1 and has duly caused this Amendment to the
Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Atlanta, State of Georgia, on April 8, 1998.

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

By: /s/ MARSHALL B. HUNT
------------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment
to the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the date indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
<C> <S> <C>

/s/ MARSHALL B. HUNT Chairman, Chief Executive April 8, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Executive
Marshall B. Hunt Officer) and Director

* Vice Chairman and Director April 8, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
Roy C. Mallady, Jr.

* President and Director April 8, 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------
William E. Peterson, Jr.

* Vice President of Finance April 8, 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------- (Principal Financial and
Mark A. Jewett Principal Accounting
Officer)

*By: /s/ MARSHALL B. HUNT
------------------------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Attorney-in-Fact
</TABLE>

II-6
<PAGE> 101

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Horizon Medical Products, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which consolidated
financial statements are included in the Prospectus, we have also audited the
financial statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) herein.

In our opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information required to be included therein.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Birmingham, Alabama
January 29, 1998

S-1
<PAGE> 102

SCHEDULE II

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, 1996, AND 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
BEGINNING CHARGED TO ENDING
BALANCE EXPENSES WRITE OFFS DEDUCTIONS OTHER(1) BALANCE
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year ended December 31, 1995:
Allowance for returns and
doubtful accounts............. $ 7,426 $ -- $ -- $ 6,264 $ -- $ 1,182
Inventory Reserve................ -- -- -- -- -- --
Year ended December 31, 1996:
Allowance for returns and
doubtful accounts............. $ 1,162 $ 5,835 $ 7,806 $ -- $ -- $ 6,997
Inventory Reserve................ -- -- -- -- -- --
Year ended December 31, 1997:
Allowance for returns and
doubtful accounts............. $ 6,997 $ 58,916 $ -- $210,098 $452,424 $308,239
Inventory Reserve................ -- 125,000 225,118 -- 350,050 249,932
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(1) Other consists of allowances and reserves acquired through acquisitions.

S-2
<PAGE> 103

EXHIBIT INDEX

<PAGE> 104

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
- ------- -----------------------
<C> <C> <S>
10.15 -- Asset Purchase and Stock Redemption Agreement dated as of
July 15, 1997 among the Company, Arrow International, Inc.
and Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc.*
10.16 -- Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 24, 1995 by and among
the Company, Horizon Acquisition Corp. and NeoStar Medical
Technologies, Inc.*
10.17 -- Secured Subordinated Note dated October 24, 1995 made by
Horizon Acquisition Corp. to the order of NeoStar Medical
Technologies, Inc. in the principal amount of $2,461,017, as
amended by Amendment to Secured Subordinated Note dated July
31, 1997*
10.18 -- Agreement dated July 31, 1997 by and among Horizon
Acquisition Corp., the Company, NeoStar Holding, Inc.,
Joseph D. Pike, Thomas F. Darden, II, Williams W. Wells and
Lance J. Bronnenkant*
10.19 -- Amendment to Security Agreement dated July 31, 1997 by and
among Horizon Acquisition Corp., NeoStar Holding, Inc.,
Joseph D. Pike, Thomas F. Darden, II, William W. Wells and
Lance J. Bronnenkant*
10.20 -- Letter Agreement dated January 8, 1998 between Arrow
International, Inc. and the Company re: the Company's use of
the Norwood facility*
10.21 -- Agreement dated January 13, 1995 between the Company and ACT
Medical, Inc.*
10.22 -- Horizon Plastic Ports: Term Sheet, dated March 18, 1997*
10.23 -- Letter Agreement 2 dated January 17, 1997 to Supply
Agreement between CarboMedics, Inc. and the Company, dated
February 17, 1993, as amended, Development Agreement, dated
February 17, 1993, by and between CarboMedics, Inc. and the
Company, as amended, and Equity Agreement, dated as of
February 17, 1993, by and between CarboMedics, Inc. and the
Company, as amended, together with Letter Agreement dated
February 17, 1993 between CarboMedics, Inc. and the Company
and the aforesaid Supply, Development and Equity Agreements*
10.24 -- Agreement dated May 8, 1997 between the Company and Robert
Cohen+*
10.25 -- Consulting and Services Agreement dated February 1, 1996
between the Company and Healthcare Alliance, Inc. as
amended*
10.26 -- Second Amended License Agreement dated January 1, 1995
between Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar and NeoStar Medical(R)
Technologies, Inc.+*
10.27 -- License Agreement dated July 1995 between Dr. Sakharam D.
Mahurkar and Strato(R)/Infusaid(TM) Inc.+*
10.28 -- Additional License Agreement dated January 1, 1997 between
Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar and the Company+*
10.29 -- Atlanta Office Purchase Agreement
10.30 -- Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 1998 between
Marshall B. Hunt and the Company
10.31 -- Employment Agreement dated as of April 3, 1998 between
William E. Peterson, Jr. and the Company
10.32 -- Premier Warrant*
10.33 -- Premier Group Purchasing Agreement+*
10.34 -- Security Agreement dated as of September 25, 1995 between
Sirrom Capital Corporation and the Company*
21.1 -- Subsidiaries of the Company*
23.1 -- Consent of King & Spalding (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
23.2 -- Consent of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 105

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBITS
- ------- -----------------------
<C> <C> <S>
24. -- Power of Attorney*
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule (for SEC filing purposes only)
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Previously filed.

** To be filed by amendment.

+ Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to portions of this
exhibit.

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 3.1

ARTICLES OF RESTATEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

Horizon Medical Products, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Georgia, hereby certifies as follows:

1. The name of the corporation is Horizon Medical Products, Inc.
(the "Corporation").

2. Pursuant to Section 14-2-1007 of the Georgia Business Corporation
Code, these Articles of Incorporation restate and amend the Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation (the "Articles of Restatement and Amendment").
These Articles of Restatement and Amendment were duly adopted by the
shareholders of the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section
14-2-1003 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code on February 11, 1998.

3. The Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation as heretofore
amended or supplemented are hereby restated and further amended to read in their
entirety as follows:
<PAGE> 2

RESTATED AND AMENDED

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

The name of the Corporation is Horizon Medical Products, Inc.

Section 2.1. Common Stock. The aggregate number of common shares
(referred to in these Articles of Incorporation as "Common Stock") which the
Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 50,000,000, with a par value of
$.001 per share. Each share of Common Stock shall have one vote on each matter
submitted to a vote of the shareholders of the Corporation. Subject to the
provisions of applicable law and the rights of the holders of the outstanding
shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of shares of Common Stock shall
be entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors of the
Corporation, out of the assets of the Corporation legally available therefor,
dividends or other distributions, whether payable in cash, property or
securities of the Corporation. The holders of shares of Common Stock shall be
entitled to receive, in proportion to the number of shares of Common Stock held,
the net assets of the Corporation upon dissolution after any preferential
amounts required to be paid or distributed to holders of outstanding shares of
Preferred Stock, if any, are so paid or distributed.

Section 2.2. Preferred Stock. The aggregate number of preferred shares
(referred to in these Articles of Incorporation as "Preferred Stock") which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 5,000,000, with no par value. The
Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time by the Board of Directors as
shares of one or more series. The description of shares of each series of
Preferred Stock, including any designations, preferences, conversion and other
rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends,
qualifications, and terms and conditions of redemption shall be as set forth in
resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, and articles of amendment shall
be filed with the Georgia Secretary of State as required by law to be filed with
respect to issuance of such Preferred Stock, prior to the issuance of any shares
of such series.

The Board of Directors is expressly authorized, at any time, by
adopting resolutions providing for the issuance of, or providing for a change in
the number of, shares of any particular series of Preferred Stock and, if and to
the extent from time to time required by

-2-

<PAGE> 3

law, by filing articles of amendment which are effective without shareholder
action, to increase or decrease the number of shares included in each series of
Preferred Stock, but not below the number of shares then issued, and to set in
any one or more respects the designations, preferences, conversion or other
rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends,
qualifications, or terms and conditions of redemption relating to the shares of
each such series. The authority of the Board of Directors with respect to each
series of Preferred Stock shall include, but not be limited to, setting or
changing the following:

(i) the dividend rate, if any, on shares of such series, the
times of payment and the date from which dividends shall be
accumulated, if dividends are to be cumulative;

(ii) whether the shares of such series shall be redeemable
and, if so, the redemption price and the terms and conditions of such
redemption;

(iii) the obligation, if any, of the Corporation to redeem
shares of such series pursuant to a sinking fund;

(iv) whether shares of such series shall be convertible into,
or exchangeable for, shares of stock of any other class or classes and,
if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion or exchange,
including the price or prices or the rate or rates of conversion or
exchange and the terms of adjustment, if any;

(v) whether the shares of such series shall have voting
rights, in addition to the voting rights provided by law, and, if so,
the extent of such voting rights;

(vi) the rights of the shares of such series in the event of
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the
Corporation; and

(vii) any other relative rights, powers, preferences,
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof relating to such
series.

No shareholder shall have any preemptive right to subscribe for or to
purchase any shares or other securities issued by the Corporation.

Section 4.1. Personal Liability of Directors. No director of the
Corporation shall be personally liable to the Corporation or its shareholders
for monetary damages for breach of duty of care or other duty as a director,
except for liability (i) for any appropriation, in violation of the director's
duties, of any business opportunity of the Corporation, (ii) for acts or

-3-

<PAGE> 4

omissions which involved intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law,
(iii) for the types of liabilities set forth in Section 14-2-832 of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code, or

(iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit. If the Georgia Business Corporation Code is amended to authorize
corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of
directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be
eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Georgia Business
Corporation Code, as amended.

Section 4.2. Effect of Repeal or Modification. Neither the repeal or
modification of this Article 4 nor the adoption of any provision of these
Articles of Incorporation inconsistent with these Articles shall eliminate or
adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation
existing immediately prior to such repeal, modification or adoption.

Section 5.1. Number and Term of Directors. Subject to the rights of the
holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under
specified circumstances, the number of directors that shall constitute the Board
of Directors of the Corporation shall be determined from time to time
exclusively by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a
majority of the entire Board. Each director shall serve for a term as described
in Section 5.2.

Section 5.2. Classified Board. The directors of the Corporation (other
than any directors who may be elected by holders of any series of Preferred
Stock then outstanding) shall be and are divided into three classes: Class I,
Class II and Class III. The number of directors in each class shall be as nearly
equal as the then-authorized number of directors constituting the Board of
Directors permits. Each director shall serve for a term ending on the date of
the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at which such director was
elected; provided, however, that the directors first elected to Class I shall
serve for a term ending on the date of the annual meeting next following the end
of the calendar year 1998, the directors first elected to Class II shall serve
for a term ending on the date of the second annual meeting next following the
end of the calendar year 1998, and the directors first elected to Class III
shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting next
following the end of the calendar year 1998. Any director who may be elected by
holders of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding shall serve for a term
ending on the date of the next annual meeting following the annual meeting at
which such director was elected.

Section 5.3. Increase or Decrease in Authorized Number of Directors. In
the event of any increase or decrease in the authorized number of directors:

(a) Each director then serving shall nevertheless continue as
a director of the class of which he is a member until the expiration of
his term, or his prior death, retirement, resignation or removal; and

-4-

<PAGE> 5

(b) Newly-created or eliminated directorships resulting from
any increase or decrease shall be apportioned by the Board of Directors
among the three classes so as to keep the number of directors in each
class as nearly equal as possible.

Section 5.4. Removal. Subject to the rights of the holders of
any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding, any or all Directors may be
removed from office at any time for cause, but only by the same affirmative vote
of the shareholders required to amend this Article 5 as provided in Section 9.2
of these Articles of Incorporation.

Section 5.5. Vacancies. Subject to the rights of the holders
of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding to fill director vacancies,
vacancies on the Board of Directors (including vacancies resulting from
retirement, resignation, removal from office or death) shall be filled
exclusively by the Board of Directors. Any director so elected shall hold office
until the next annual meeting of shareholders.

In discharging the duties of their respective positions and in
determining what is believed to be in the best interests of the Corporation, the
Board of Directors, committees of the Board of Directors, and individual
directors, in addition to considering the effects of any action on the
Corporation or its shareholders, may consider the interests of the employees,
customers, suppliers and creditors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, the
communities in which offices or other establishments of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries are located, and all other factors such directors consider
pertinent; provided, however, that this provision solely grants discretionary
authority to the directors and no constituency shall be deemed to have been
given any right to consideration hereby.

Any action required or permitted to be taken at a
shareholders' meeting may be taken without a meeting if the action is taken by
all of the shareholders entitled to vote on the action, or by persons who would
be entitled to vote at a meeting those shares having voting power to cast not
less than the minimum number (or numbers, in the case of voting by groups) of
votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such actions at a meeting at
which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted. The action must be
evidenced by one or more written consents describing the action taken, signed by
shareholders entitled to take action without a meeting and delivered to the
Corporation for inclusion in the minutes or filing with the corporate records.

The mailing address of the principal office of the Corporation
is One Horizon Way, P.O. Drawer 627, Manchester, Georgia 31816.

-5-

<PAGE> 6

Section 9.1. Amendment. These Articles of Incorporation may not be
amended without the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the shares
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting as a single
voting group.

Section 9.2. Supermajority Vote Required for Certain Amendments.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in these Articles of Incorporation or
the Bylaws of the Corporation and subject to the rights of holders of any series
of Preferred Stock then outstanding (and notwithstanding that a lesser
percentage may be specified by law, these Articles of Incorporation or the
Bylaws of the Corporation), (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
70% of the outstanding shares of the Corporation shall be required to alter,
amend or repeal, or adopt any provisions inconsistent with, Article 4, Article 5
or this Section 9.2 of these Articles of Incorporation, and (ii) Article II of
the Bylaws of the Corporation shall not be altered, amended or repealed, and no
provision inconsistent therewith shall be adopted, without the affirmative vote
of a majority of the entire Board of Directors or of the holders of at least 70%
of the outstanding shares of the Corporation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Horizon Medical Products, Inc. has caused these
Articles of Restatement and Amendment to Articles of Incorporation to be
executed, its corporate seal to be affixed, and its seal and execution hereof to
be attested, all by its duly authorized officers, this day of February,
1998.

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

By:
Name:
Title:

[CORPORATE SEAL]

Attest:
Name:
Title:

-6-

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 3.2

AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

ARTICLE I

SHAREHOLDERS

Section 1. Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the shareholders
for the election of directors and for the transaction of such other business as
may properly come before the meeting shall be held at such place, either within
or without the State of Georgia, on such date, and at such time, as the Board of
Directors may by resolution provide, or if the Board of Directors fails to
provide, then such meeting shall be held at the principal office of the
Corporation at 10:00 a.m., local time, on the fourth Tuesday in April of each
year, if not a legal holiday under the laws of the State of Georgia, and if a
legal holiday, on the next succeeding business day. The Board of Directors may
specify by resolution prior to any special meeting of shareholders held within
the year that such meeting shall be in lieu of the annual meeting.

Section 2. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders
may be called by the Board of Directors, by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, by the President, or by the Corporation upon the written request
(which request shall set forth the purpose or purposes of the meeting) of the
shareholders of record (see Section 6(b) of Article I of these Bylaws) of
outstanding shares representing more than 70% of all the votes entitled to be
cast on any issue proposed to be considered at the proposed special meeting. In
the event such meeting is called by the Board of Directors, such meeting may be
held at such place, either within or without the State of Georgia, as is stated
in the call and notice thereof. If such meeting is called at the request of
shareholders as provided in this Section 2, then such meeting shall be held at
such place in the State of Georgia as is stated in the notice thereof.

Section 3. Notice of Meetings. A written or printed notice stating
the place, day and hour of the meeting, and in case of a special meeting, the
purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called, shall be delivered or
mailed by the Secretary of the Corporation to each holder of record of stock of
the Corporation at the time entitled to vote, at his address as it appears upon
the records of the Corporation, not less than 10 nor more than 60 days prior to
such meeting. If the Secretary fails to give such notice within 20 days after
the call of a meeting, the person calling or requesting such meeting, or any
person designated by them, may give such notice. Notice of such meeting may be
waived in writing by any shareholder. Notice of any adjourned meeting of the
shareholders shall not be required if the time and place to which the meeting is
adjourned are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, unless
the Board of Directors sets a new record date for such meeting in which case
notice shall be given in the manner provided in this Section 3.

<PAGE> 2

Section 4. Quorum and Shareholder Vote. A quorum for action on any
subject matter at any annual or special meeting of shareholders shall exist when
the holders of shares entitled to vote a majority of the votes entitled to be
cast on such subject matter are represented in person or by proxy at such
meeting. If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of such number of shares
as is required by the Georgia Business Corporation Code (as in effect at the
time the vote is taken), for approval of the subject matter being voted upon,
shall be the act of the shareholders, unless a greater vote is required by the
Articles of Incorporation or these Bylaws. If a quorum is not present, a meeting
of shareholders may be adjourned from time to time by the vote of shares having
a majority of the votes of the shares represented at such meeting, until a
quorum is present. When a quorum is present at the reconvening of any adjourned
meeting, and if the requirements of Section 3 of this Article I have been
observed, then any business may be transacted at such reconvened meeting in the
same manner and to the same extent as it might have been transacted at the
meeting as originally noticed.

Section 5. Proxies. A shareholder may vote either in person or by
proxy duly executed in writing by the shareholder. Unless written notice to the
contrary is delivered to the Corporation by the shareholder, a proxy for any
meeting shall be valid for any reconvention of any adjourned meeting.

Section 6. Fixing Record Date.

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this Section 6, for the
purpose of determining shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any
meeting of shareholders or any adjournment thereof, or entitled to receive
payment of any dividend, or in order to make a determination of shareholders for
any other proper purpose, the Board of Directors shall have the power to fix a
date, not more than 70 days prior to the date on which the particular action
requiring a determination of shareholders is to be taken, as the record date for
any such determination of shareholders. A record date for the determination of
shareholders entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of shareholders or
any adjournment thereof shall not be set less than 10 days prior to such
meeting; provided that the record date for the determination of shareholders
entitled to notice of or to vote at any special meeting of shareholders called
by the Corporation at the request of holders of shares pursuant to Section 2 of
Article I hereof or any adjournment thereof shall be 20 days after the
"Determination Date" (as defined in paragraph (b) of this Section 6), and
provided further that such record date shall be 70 days prior to such special
meeting. In any case where a record date is set, under any provision of this
Section 6, only shareholders of record on the said date shall be entitled to
participate in the action for which the determination of shareholders of record
is made, whether the action is payment of a dividend, allotment of any rights or
any change or conversion or exchange of capital stock or other such action, and,
if the record date is set for the determination of shareholders entitled to
notice of or to vote at a meeting of shareholders, only such shareholders of
record shall be entitled to such notice or vote, notwithstanding any transfer of
any shares on the books of the Corporation after such record date.

-2-

<PAGE> 3

(b) (i) In order that the Corporation may determine the
shareholders entitled to request a special meeting of the shareholders or a
special meeting in lieu of the annual meeting of the shareholders pursuant to
Section 2 of Article I hereof, the Board of Directors may fix a record date,
which record date shall not precede the date upon which the resolution fixing
the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors, and which date shall not
be more than 10 days after the date upon which the resolution fixing the record
date is adopted by the Board of Directors. Any shareholder of record seeking to
have the shareholders request such a special meeting shall, by written notice to
the Secretary, request the Board of Directors to fix a record date. The Board of
Directors shall, within 10 business days after the date on which such a request
is received, adopt a resolution fixing the record date. If no record date has
been fixed by the Board of Directors within 10 business days after the date on
which such a request is received, the record date for determining shareholders
entitled to request such a special meeting shall be the first day on which a
signed written request setting forth the request to fix a record date is
delivered to the Corporation by delivery to its principal place of business, or
any officer or agent of the Corporation having custody of the books in which
proceedings of meetings of shareholders are recorded.

(ii) Every written request for a special meeting shall bear the
date of signature of each shareholder who signs the request and no such request
shall be effective to request such a meeting unless, within 70 days after the
record date established in accordance with paragraph (b)(i) of this Section,
written requests signed by a sufficient number of record holders as of such
record date to request a special meeting in accordance with Section 2 of Article
I hereof are delivered to the Corporation in the manner prescribed in paragraph
(b)(i) of this Section.

(iii) In the event of the delivery, in the manner provided by this
Section, to the Corporation of the requisite written request or requests for a
special meeting and/or any related revocation or revocations, the Corporation
shall promptly perform a ministerial review of the validity of the requests and
revocations. For the purpose of permitting a prompt ministerial review by the
Corporation, no request by shareholders for a special meeting shall be effective
until the earlier of (i) five business days following delivery to the
Corporation of requests signed by the holders of record (on the record date
established in paragraph (b)(i) of this Section) of the requisite minimum number
of shares that would be necessary to request such a meeting under Section 2 of
Article I hereof, or (ii) such date as the Corporation certifies that the
requests delivered to the Corporation in accordance with this Article represent
at least the minimum number of shares that would be necessary to request such
meeting (the earlier of such dates being herein referred to as the
"Determination Date"). Nothing contained in this paragraph shall in any way be
construed to suggest or imply that the Board of Directors or any shareholder
shall not be entitled to contest the validity of any request or revocation
thereof, whether during or after such five business day period, or to take any
other action (including, without limitation, the commencement, prosecution or
defense of any litigation with respect thereto).

(iv) Unless the Corporation shall deliver, on or before the
Determination Date, a certificate stating that the valid requests for a special
meeting submitted pursuant to paragraph (iii) above represent less than the
requisite minimum number of shares that would be necessary to

-3-

<PAGE> 4

request a special meeting under Section 2 of Article I hereof, the Board of
Directors shall, within five business days after the Determination Date, adopt a
resolution calling a special meeting of the shareholders and fixing a record
date for such meeting, in accordance with Section 6(a) of Article I of these
Bylaws.

Section 7. Notice of Shareholder Business. At an annual meeting of
the shareholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall have been
brought before the meeting (a) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors
or (b) by any shareholder of the Corporation who complies with the notice
procedures set forth in this Section 7 and only to the extent that such business
is appropriate for shareholder action under the provisions of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code. For business to be properly brought before an annual
meeting by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof
in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder's
notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive
offices of the Corporation, not less than 120 days prior to the first
anniversary of the date of the Corporation's notice of annual meeting provided
with respect to the prior year's annual meeting. A shareholder's notice to the
Secretary shall set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring
before the annual meeting (a) a brief description of the business desired to be
brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business
at the annual meeting, (b) the name and address, as they appear on the
Corporation's books, of the shareholder proposing such business, (c) the class
and number of shares of stock of the Corporation which are beneficially owned by
the shareholder, and (d) any material interest of the shareholder in such
business. Notwithstanding anything in the Bylaws to the contrary, no business
shall be conducted at an annual meeting except in accordance with the procedures
set forth in this Section 7. At an annual meeting, the Chairman shall, if the
facts warrant, determine and declare to the meeting that business was not
properly brought before the meeting in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 7, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and
any such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be
transacted.

Section 8. Notice of Shareholder Nominees. Except for Directors
who are elected by Directors pursuant to the provisions of Section 9 of Article
II of these Bylaws, only persons who are nominated in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Section 8 shall be eligible for election as
Directors. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the
Corporation may be made at a meeting of shareholders (a) by or at the direction
of the Board of Directors or (b) by any shareholder of the Corporation entitled
to vote for the election of Directors at the meeting who complies with the
notice procedures set forth in this Section 8. Such nominations, other than
those made by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, shall be made
pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be
timely, a shareholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at
the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than 120 days nor
more than 180 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the
Corporation's notice of annual meeting provided with respect to the prior year's
annual meeting. Such shareholder's notice shall set forth (a) as to each person
whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a
Director, all information relating to such person that is required to be
disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of Directors, or is otherwise

-4-

<PAGE> 5

required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and (b) as to the shareholder giving the notice (i) the
name and address, as they appear on the Corporation's books, of such shareholder
and (ii) the class and number of shares of stock of the Corporation which are
beneficially owned by such shareholder. No person shall be eligible for election
as a Director of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the Bylaws. The Chairman shall, if the facts warrant,
determine and declare to the meeting that a nomination was not made in
accordance with the procedures prescribed by the Bylaws, and if he should so
determine, he shall so declare to the meeting and the defective nomination shall
be disregarded.

ARTICLE II

DIRECTORS

Section 1. Powers of Directors. The Board of Directors shall
manage the business and affairs of the Corporation and, subject to any
restrictions imposed by law, by the Articles of Incorporation, or by these
Bylaws, may exercise all the powers of the Corporation.

Section 2. Number and Term of Directors.

(a) Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of
Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, the
number of directors that shall constitute the Board of Directors of the
Corporation shall be determined from time to time exclusively by the Board of
Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the entire Board. No
decrease in the number of Directors shall shorten the term of an incumbent
Director.

(b) The Directors of the Corporation (other than any Directors who
may be elected by holders of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding)
shall be and are divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III.
The number of Directors in each class shall be as nearly equal as the
then-authorized number of Directors constituting the Board of Directors permits.
Each Director shall serve for a term ending on the date of the third annual
meeting following the annual meeting at which such Director was elected;
provided, however, that the directors first elected to Class I shall serve for a
term ending on the date of the annual meeting next following the end of the
calendar year 1998, the directors first elected to Class II shall serve for a
term ending on the date of the second annual meeting next following the end of
the calendar year 1998, and the directors first elected to Class III shall serve
for a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting next following the end
of the calendar year 1998. Any director who may be elected by holders of any
series of Preferred Stock then outstanding shall serve for a term ending on the
date of the next annual meeting following the annual meeting at which such
director was elected.

-5-

<PAGE> 6

(i) Each Director then serving shall nevertheless
continue as a Director of the class of which he is a member until the
expiration of his term or his prior death, retirement, resignation or
removal; and

(ii) Newly-created or eliminated Directorships resulting
from any increase or decrease shall be apportioned by the Board of
Directors among the three classes so as to keep the number of Directors
in each class as nearly equal as possible.

Section 3. Meetings of the Directors. The Board of Directors
shall meet each year immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders,
and the Board may by resolution provide for the time and place of other regular
meetings. Special meetings of the Directors may be called by the Chairman of the
Board of Directors, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President or by any
two of the Directors.

Section 4. Notice of Meetings. Notice of each meeting of the
Directors shall be given by the Secretary by mailing the same at least ten days
before the meeting or by telephone, telegraph, facsimile or cablegram or in
person at least five days before the meeting, to each Director, except that no
notice need be given of regular meetings fixed by the resolution of the Board or
of the meeting of the Board held at the place of and immediately following the
annual meeting of the shareholders. Any Director may waive notice, either before
or after the meeting, and shall be deemed to have waived notice if he is present
at the meeting.

Section 5. Action of Directors Without a Meeting. Any action
required by law to be taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors, or any
action which may be taken at a meeting of the Board of Directors, or of any
committee thereof, may be taken without a meeting if written consent, setting
forth the action so taken, shall be signed by all the Directors, or all the
members of the committee, as the case may be, and be filed with the minutes of
the proceedings of the Board or the committee. Such consent shall have the same
force and effect as a unanimous vote of the Board or the committee, as the case
may be.

Section 6. Committees. The Board of Directors may, in its
discretion, appoint committees, each consisting of one or more Directors, which
shall have and may exercise such delegated powers as shall be conferred on or
authorized by the resolutions appointing them, except that no such committee
may: (1) approve or propose to shareholders action that the Georgia Business
Corporation Code requires to be approved by shareholders, (2) fill vacancies on
the Board of Directors or any of its committees, (3) amend the Articles of
Incorporation of the Corporation pursuant to Section 14-2-1002 of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code, (4) adopt, amend or repeal these Bylaws, or (5)
approve a plan of merger not requiring shareholder approval. A majority of any
such committee may determine its action, fix the time and place of its meetings,
and determine its rules of procedure. Each committee shall keep minutes of its
proceedings and actions and shall report regularly to the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors shall have power at any time to fill vacancies in, change
the membership of, or discharge any such committee.

-6-

<PAGE> 7

Section 7. Compensation. The Board of Directors shall have the
authority to determine from time to time the amount of compensation that shall
be paid to its members for attendance at meetings of, or service on, the Board
of Directors or any committee of the Board. The Board of Directors also shall
have the power to reimburse Directors for reasonable expenses of attendance at
Directors' meetings and committee meetings.

Section 8. Removal. Subject to the rights of the holders of any
series of Preferred Stock then outstanding, any or all Directors may be removed
from office at any time for cause, but only by the same affirmative vote of the
shareholders required to amend this Article II as provided in the Corporation's
Articles of Incorporation.

Section 9. Vacancies. Subject to the rights of the holders of any
series of Preferred Stock then outstanding to fill director vacancies, vacancies
on the Board of Directors (including, without limitation, vacancies resulting
from retirement, resignation, removal from office (with or without cause) or
death) shall be filled exclusively by the Board of Directors. Any Director so
elected shall hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders.

Section 10. Telephone Conference Meetings. Unless the Articles of
Incorporation otherwise provide, members of the Board of Directors, or any
committee designated by the Board of Directors, may participate in a meeting of
the Board or committee by means of telephone conference or similar
communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the
meeting can hear each other, and participation in a meeting pursuant to this
Section 10 shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.

ARTICLE III

OFFICERS

Section 1. Officers. The officers of the Corporation shall consist
of a Chairman of the Board of Directors, a Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors, a Chief Executive Officer, a President, one or more Vice Presidents,
a Secretary and a Treasurer, and such other officers or assistant officers as
may be elected by the Board of Directors. More than one office may be held by
the same person. The Board may designate a Vice President as an Executive Vice
President or a Senior Vice President, and may designate the order in which the
other Vice Presidents may act.

Section 2. Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Chairman of the
Board of Directors shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders and all
meetings of the Board of Directors and shall have such other duties as the Board
of Directors shall from time to time prescribe.

Section 3. Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Vice
Chairman of the Board of Directors shall preside at all meetings of the
shareholders and all meetings of the Board of

-7-

<PAGE> 8

Directors in the absence of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and shall
have such other duties as the Board of Directors shall from time to time
prescribe.

Section 4. Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer
shall be the chief executive officer of the Corporation. He shall, under the
direction of the Board of Directors, have responsibility for the general
direction of the business, policies and affairs of the Corporation and shall
supervise the management of the day-to-day business of the Corporation. He shall
have such further powers and duties as from time to time may be conferred on him
by the Board of Directors. In the absence of the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, he shall preside at
all meetings of the shareholders and the Board of Directors.

Section 5. President. The President shall have responsibility for
the general direction of the business, policies and affairs of the Corporation
and shall supervise the management of the day-to-day business of the
Corporation. He shall have such further powers and duties as from time to time
may be conferred on him by and shall report to the Chief Executive Officer.

Section 6. Vice President. The Vice President shall act in the
case of the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and
the President. If there is more than one Vice President, such Vice Presidents
shall act in the order of precedence, as set out by the Board of Directors.

Section 7. Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be responsible for the
maintenance of proper financial books and records of the Corporation.

Section 8. Secretary. The Secretary shall keep the minutes of the
meetings of the shareholders and the Directors and shall have custody of and
attest the seal of the Corporation.

Section 9. Other Duties and Authorities. Each officer, employee
and agent shall have such other duties and authorities as may be conferred on
them by the Board of Directors.

Section 10. Removal. Any officer may be removed at any time by the
Board of Directors, and such vacancy may be filled by the Board of Directors. A
contract of employment for a definite term shall not prevent the removal of any
officer, but this provision shall not prevent the making of a contract of
employment with any officer and shall have no effect upon any cause of action
which any officer may have as a result of removal in breach of a contract of
employment.

Section 11. Compensation. The salaries of the officers shall be
fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors. No officer shall be prevented
from receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he is also a Director of
the Corporation.

-8-

<PAGE> 9

ARTICLE IV

DEPOSITORIES, SIGNATURE AND SEAL

Section 1. Depositories. All funds of the Corporation shall be
deposited in the name of the Corporation in such depository or depositories as
the Board may designate and shall be drawn out on checks, drafts or other orders
signed by such officer, officers, agent or agents as the Board may from time to
time authorize.

Section 2. Contracts. All contracts and other instruments shall be
signed on behalf of the Corporation by the Chairman of the Board of Directors,
the President, any Vice President or by such other officer, officers, agent or
agents, as the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the President designates
from time to time or as the Board from time to time may by resolution provide.

Section 3. Seal. The seal of the Corporation shall be as follows:

The seal may be manually affixed to any document or may be
lithographed or otherwise printed on any document with the same force and effect
as if it had been affixed manually. The signature of the Secretary or Assistant
Secretary shall attest the seal and may be a facsimile if and to the extent
permitted by law.

ARTICLE V

STOCK TRANSFERS

Section 1. Form and Execution of Certificates. The certificates of
shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be in such form as may be
approved by the Board of Directors and shall be signed by the Chairman of the
Board of Directors, the President or a Vice President and by the Secretary or
any Assistant Secretary or the Treasurer or any Assistant Treasurer, provided
that any such certificate may be signed by the facsimile signature of either or
both of such officers imprinted thereon if the same is countersigned by a
transfer agent of the Corporation, and provided further that certificates
bearing the facsimile of the signature of such officers imprinted thereon shall
be valid in all respects as if such person or persons were still in office, even
though such officer or officers shall have died or otherwise ceased to be
officers.

Section 2. Transfers of Shares. Shares of stock in the Corporation
shall be transferable only on the books of the Corporation by proper transfer
signed by the holder of record thereof or by a person duly authorized to sign
for such holder of record. The Corporation or its transfer agent or agents shall
be authorized to refuse any transfer unless and until it is furnished such
evidence as it may reasonably require showing that the requested transfer is
proper.

-9-

<PAGE> 10
Section 3. Lost, Destroyed or Stolen Certificates. Where the
holder of record of a share or shares of stock of the Corporation claims that
the certificate representing said share has been lost, destroyed or wrongfully
taken, the Board shall by resolution provide for the issuance of a certificate
to replace the original if the holder of record so requests before the
Corporation has notice that the certificate has been acquired by a bona fide
purchaser, files with the Corporation a sufficient indemnity bond, and furnishes
evidence of such loss, destruction or wrongful taking satisfactory to the
Corporation, in the reasonable exercise of its discretion. The Board may
authorize such officer or agent as it may designate to determine the sufficiency
of such an indemnity bond and to determine reasonably the sufficiency of the
evidence of loss, destruction or wrongful taking.

Section 4. Transfer Agent and Registrar. The Board may (but shall
not be required to) appoint a transfer agent or agents and a registrar or
registrars to transfers, and may require that all stock certificates bear the
signature of such transfer agent or of such transfer agent and registrar.

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION

Section 1. Mandatory Indemnification. The Corporation shall
indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by the Georgia Business Corporation
Code, and to the extent that applicable law from time to time in effect shall
permit indemnification that is broader than provided in these Bylaws, then to
the maximum extent authorized by law, any individual made a party to a
proceeding (as defined in the Georgia Business Corporation Code) because he is
or was a director or officer against liability (as defined in the Georgia
Business Corporation Code), incurred in the proceeding, if he acted in a manner
he believed in good faith to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
Corporation and, in the case of any criminal proceeding, he had no reasonable
cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

Section 2. Permissive Indemnification. The Corporation shall have
the power to indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by the Georgia Business
Corporation Code, any individual made a party to a proceeding (as defined in the
Georgia Business Corporation Code) because he is or was an employee or agent of
the Company against liability (as defined in the Georgia Business Corporation
Code), incurred in the proceeding, if he acted in a manner he believed in good
faith to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation and, in
the case of any criminal proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe his
conduct was unlawful.

Section 3. Advances for Expenses. The Corporation shall pay for or
reimburse the reasonable expenses incurred by a director or officer who is a
party to a proceeding, and shall have the authority to pay for or reimburse the
reasonable expenses of an employee or agent of the Company who is a party to a
proceeding, in each case in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding if:

-10-

<PAGE> 11
(a) Such person furnishes the Corporation a written affirmation
of his good faith belief that he has met the standard of
conduct set forth in Section 1 or Section 2 above, as
applicable; and

(b) Such person furnishes the Corporation his written
undertaking to repay any funds advanced if it is ultimately
determined that he is not entitled to indemnification.

The written undertaking required by paragraph (b) above must be an
unlimited general obligation of such person but need not be secured and may be
accepted without reference to financial ability to make repayment.

Section 4. Indemnification Not Exclusive. The right to
indemnification and the payment of expenses incurred in defending a proceeding
in advance of its final disposition conferred in this Article VI shall not be
exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire
under any statute, provision of the Articles of Incorporation, provision of
these Bylaws, agreement, vote of shareholders or disinterested directors or
otherwise.

Section 5. Amendment or Repeal. Any repeal or modification of the
foregoing provisions of this Article VI shall not adversely affect any right or
protection hereunder of any person in respect of any act or omission occurring
prior to the time of such repeal or modification.

ARTICLE VII

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS WITH INTERESTED SHAREHOLDERS

All of the requirements of Article 11A of the Georgia Business
Corporation Code (currently codified in Sections 14-2-1131 through 14-2-1133
thereof), as may be in effect from time to time (the "Business Combination
Statute"), shall apply to all "business combinations" (as defined in Section
14-2-1131 of the Georgia Business Corporation Code) involving the Corporation.
The requirements of the Business Combination Statute shall be in addition to the
requirements of Article VIII of these Bylaws. Nothing contained in the Business
Combination Statute shall be deemed to limit the provisions contained in Article
VIII of these Bylaws, and nothing contained in Article VIII of these Bylaws
shall be deemed to limit the provisions contained in the Business Combination
Statute.

-11-

<PAGE> 12
ARTICLE VIII

FAIR PRICE PROVISIONS

All requirements of Sections 14-2-1110 through 14-2-1113 of the Georgia
Business Corporation Code, as may be in effect from time to time, shall apply to
the Corporation.

ARTICLE IX

AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS

Section 1. Amendment.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation
or these Bylaws, these Bylaws may be altered, amended, repealed or new Bylaws
adopted by the Board of Directors by the affirmative vote of a majority of all
directors then holding office, but any bylaws adopted by the Board of Directors
may be altered, amended, repealed, or any new bylaws adopted, by the
shareholders at an annual or special meeting of shareholders, when notice of any
such proposed alteration, amendment, repeal or addition shall have been given in
the notice of such meeting. The shareholders may prescribe that any bylaw or
bylaws adopted by them shall not be altered, amended or repealed by the Board of
Directors. Except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation or
these Bylaws, action by the shareholders with respect to these Bylaws shall be
taken by an affirmative vote of a majority of all shares outstanding and
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting as a single
voting group.

(b) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Article II of
these Bylaws shall not be altered, amended or repealed, and no provision
inconsistent therewith shall be adopted, without the affirmative vote of a
majority of the entire Board of Directors or of the holders of at least 70% of
the outstanding shares of the Corporation.

-12-

<PAGE> 1

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
EXHIBIT 4.2

NUMBER [LOGO] HMP SHARES
HMP Horizon
Medical
Products, INC.
COMMON STOCK INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA COMMON STOCK
CUSIP 439903 10 5

SEE REVERSE FOR
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
This Certifies that

is the owner of

SHARES OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE S.001 PER SHARE, OF

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate
Seal to be hereunto affixed.

Dated:

/s/ HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. /s/
CORPORATE
SEAL
1990 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Secretary GEORGIA

Countersigned and Registered:
SUNTRUST BANK, ATLANTA
Transfer Agent
By and Registrar

Authorized Signature
</TABLE>

<S> <C>
HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they
were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:

TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties ------------------- ---------------
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of (Cust) (Minor)
survivorship and not as tenants Under Uniform Gifts to Minors
in common
Act
--------------------------
(State)

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

- ----------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
shares
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

, Attorney,
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation, with full power or substitution in the premises.

Dated
------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION AND
CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM). PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.

</TABLE>

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 5.1

(404) 572-4600 (404) 572-5100

April 8, 1998

Horizon Medical Products, Inc.
One Horizon Way
P.O. Drawer 627
Manchester, Georgia 31816

Re: Horizon Medical Products, Inc. -- Registration Statement on
Form S-1 relating to 2,600,000 shares of Common Stock

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as counsel for Horizon Medical Products, Inc., a Georgia
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the preparation of a
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement") filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 relating to
the proposed public offering and sale of up to (i) 2,600,000 shares of the
Company's Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Company Firm Shares") by
the Company, (ii) 390,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.001
per share, subject to an overallotment option by the Company (the "Company
Option Shares"), 873,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.001
per share (the "Shareholders Firm Shares") by the Selling Shareholders and (iv)
130,950 shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, subject
to an overallotment option by the Selling Shareholders (the "Shareholders Option
Shares") pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement")
to be entered into among the Company, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation,
BancAmerica Robertson Stephens and NationsBanc Montgomery Securities LLC, as
representatives of the several underwriters.

In connection with this opinion, we have examined and relied upon such
records, documents, certificates and other instruments as in our judgment are
necessary or appropriate to form the basis for the opinions hereinafter set
forth. In all such examinations, we have assumed the genuineness of signatures
on original documents and the conformity to such original documents of all
copies submitted to us as certified, conformed or photographic copies, and as to
certificates of public officials, we have assumed the same to have been properly
given and to be accurate. As to matters of fact material to this opinion, we
have relied upon statements and representations of representatives of the
Company and of public officials.
<PAGE> 2
Horizon Medical Products
April 7, 1998
Page 2

The opinions expressed herein are limited in all respects to the
Georgia Business Corporation Code, and no opinion is expressed with respect to
the laws of any other jurisdiction or any effect which such laws may have on the
opinions expressed herein. This opinion is limited to the matters stated herein,
and no opinion is implied or may be inferred beyond the matters expressly stated
herein.

Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

(i) Upon the filing and acceptance of the Company's
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of
State of Georgia, the Company Firm Shares will be duly authorized and,
upon the issuance of the Company Firm Shares against payment therefore
as provided in the Underwriting Agreement, the Company Firm Shares will
be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

(ii) Upon the filing and acceptance of the Company's
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of
State of Georgia, the Company Option Shares will be duly authorized
and, upon the issuance of the Company Option Shares against payment
therefore as provided in the Underwriting Agreement, the Company Option
Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

(iii) Upon the filing and acceptance of the Company's
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of
State of Georgia, the Shareholders Firm Shares will be duly authorized,
and upon the issuance of certain of such Shareholders Firm Shares
against payment therefor as provided in any warrant or similar
agreement to which they may be subject, the Shareholders Firm Shares
will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

This opinion is given as of the date hereof, and we assume no
obligation to advise you after the date hereof of facts or circumstances that
come to our attention or changes in law that occur which could affect the
opinions contained herein. This letter is being rendered solely for the benefit
of the Company in connection with the matters addressed herein. This opinion may
not be furnished to or relied upon by any person or entity for any purpose
without our prior written consent.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to us under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Prospectus that is included in the Registration Statement.

Very truly yours,

KING & SPALDING

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.29

NORTH PARKWAY SQUARE, A CONDOMINIUM

CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 20th day of February, 1998,
by and between CARDIAC MEDICAL, INC., a Georgia corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "Seller"), and HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. (hereinafter
referred to as the "Purchaser");

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of Unit 7-2, North Parkway Square, an
office condominium consisting of 3,300 square feet (measured on the exterior
faces of the exterior walls of the building in which the Unit is located) and
located on the entire second floor at Seven North Parkway Square, 4200 Northside
Parkway, N.W., Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia 30327 (the "Unit"), which is
subject to Declaration for North Parkway Square, a Condominium, dated March 28,
1985 and recorded at Deed Book 9443, page 373, Fulton County, Georgia records,
as amended (hereinafter referred to as the "Declaration"), and being located on
a tract of land approximately 9.4 acres along the southern side of Northside
Parkway (U.S. Highway 41) in Land Lots 215 and 236 of the 17th District of
Fulton County, Georgia and being more particularly described on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter referred to as
the "Land"); and

WHEREAS, Purchaser desires to purchase the Unit from Seller.

1. Purchase and Sale. Purchaser agrees to purchase the Unit and
Seller agrees to sell the Unit under and subject to the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth. Excluded from the sale hereunder shall be all personal
property, equipment, furniture, appliances, and fixtures located in the Unit
(including without limitation all lighting fixtures, window treatments, and
draperies) (all of which collectively is referred to as the "Excluded
Property"). It is acknowledged by the parties that the personal property within
the Unit that is in the individual office of each of Roy C. Mallady, Jr.,
Marshall B. Hunt, and William E. Peterson, Jr. is owned by such individual and
that any items of personal property within the Unit but outside of such
individual offices that was originally contributed or loaned to Seller by Roy C.
Mallady, Jr., Marshall B. Hunt, or William E. Peterson, Jr. for purposes of
furnishing the Unit remains the property of such individual who made such
contribution or loan.

2. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Unit shall be Four
Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Dollars ($472,000.00), to be paid in cash or by
certified or cashier's check at closing.

3. Closing. The closing shall take place on a date and at a time
agreed to by Seller and Purchaser at the Unit, but no later than April 30, 1998.

<PAGE> 2

4. Conveyance and Title. Seller agrees to convey the Unit to
Purchaser by General Warranty Deed subject only to (a) zoning ordinances,
variance, and regulations affecting the Land; (b) utility easements and
facilities, if any, now or hereafter affecting the Land; (c) ad valorem taxes
for the year of sale not yet due and payable and for prior years resulting from
possible adjustments to the Fulton County tax digest; (d) the terms, conditions,
covenants, and provisions set forth in the Declaration, and the Articles of
Incorporation, the By-Laws, and Rules and Regulations of the Condominium
Association described in the Declaration, and any matters now or hereafter shown
on any plats or revisions thereof; (e) Right-of-Way Deeds given or to be given
to the appropriate political subdivision of the State of Georgia for the
widening of Northside Parkway; (f) Mutual Parking Lot Agreement with Mount Paran
Church of God, Inc., dated June 21, 1983, and recorded in Deed Book 8546, page
317, Fulton County, Georgia records; (g) Easements for drainage, construction,
and maintenance, and releases contained in Right-of-Way Deeds and Easements
recorded in Deed Book 1538, page 485, Deed Book 1654, page 204, Deed Book 1538,
page 486, and Deed Book 1655, page 242, Fulton County, Georgia records; (b)
Indemnity Agreement from Ward Wight and Verney Bentley to City of Atlanta, dated
October 31, 1981, recorded in Deed Book 7983, page 1, Fulton County Georgia
records; (i) Indemnity Agreements now or hereafter given to the City of Atlanta
with respect to drainage facilities and water run-off; (j) the rights of the
public over and across that portion of the Land known as Old Settlement Road;
(k) the fact that no access to and from a public street is available over Old
Settlement Road; (l) Conveyance of Access Rights from DuBose-Jones Company to
Department of Transportation, State of Georgia, dated February 2, 1984, recorded
in Deed Book 9215, page 197, Fulton County, Georgia records; (m) the rights of
tenants occupying the Unit; and (n) other easements, restrictions, and covenants
of record or to be recorded, if any, which do not adversely affect the ability
of the Purchaser to use the Unit as an office. Title shall be deemed marketable
if a national title insurance company will issue its commitment at standard
rates with only its standard exceptions and any exceptions permitted hereunder.
Purchaser shall have a reasonable time after acceptance of this Agreement in
which to examine title and in which to furnish Seller with a written statement
of objections affecting the marketability of said title. Seller shall be
entitled to satisfy valid objections by using funds from the closing proceeds
provided by Purchaser at the closing. If Seller is unable to correct such
defects at or prior to the closing or would be unable to correct such defects
with funds from the closing proceeds provided by Purchaser at the closing, then,
at the option of Purchaser, evidenced by written notice to Seller, and this
Agreement shall be null and void and the parties hereto shall have no further
liability to each other. The outstanding Security Deed on the Unit held by
NationsBank of Georgia securing indebtedness of Seller shall be paid and
satisfied at the closing with proceeds payable to Seller at the closing.

5. Taxes and Closing Costs. At the closing, Seller shall pay the
State of Georgia real property transfer tax. Purchaser shall pay all other
closing costs, exclusive of the fees and charges of any attorney representing
Seller, but inclusive of any and all costs, charges, taxes, fees, and expenses
attributable to any financing of the Unit or the purchase thereof by Purchaser.
All ad valorem taxes and any other items customarily prorated (including, but
not limited to, the assessment for Common Expenses of the Condominium and
utilities), shall be prorated as of the date of closing. If the taxes have

-2-
<PAGE> 3

not been assessed at date of closing, the proration shall be based upon the
assessment for the prior year and the parties shall by appropriate payment
adjust the same at the time the taxes for the year of closing become known.
Seller shall pay any additional taxes with respect to prior years if and when
the tax digest is adjusted for prior years.

6. No Warranty. The Property shall be conveyed "AS IS" except for
the warranty of title provided for in paragraph 4 above. SELLER MAKES NO
WARRANTY AS TO THE CONDITION OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR USE.

7. Assignment. Purchaser may not, without the express written
consent of Seller, which may be denied, assign this Agreement or any right,
title, or interest hereunder. Any purported assignment by Purchaser with
Seller's express prior written consent thereto shall be null and void. In the
event of an assignment by Purchaser permitted herein or consented to by Seller,
the Purchaser shall nevertheless continue fully obligated, jointly and severally
with such assignee, for the performance of all of Purchaser's obligations
hereunder until the closing of the sale with such assignee Purchaser.

8. Office Agreement Between Seller and Sulzer Intermedics, Inc.
Purchaser acknowledges that it has received a copy of the Office Agreement dated
October 1, 1997 between Seller and Sulzer Intermedics, Inc. ("Sulzer")
pertaining to the use of certain portions of the Unit by Sulzer, or at a
location agreed upon by Sulzer and Purchaser, from time to time over a period of
five years. Purchaser agrees that Purchaser will provide such space to Sulzer at
the Unit or at a location mutually agreed upon by Sulzer and Purchaser pursuant
to the terms of the Office Agreement. Subsequent to the closing of the purchase,
Seller will continue to be entitled to all payments due under the Office
Agreement to Seller from Sulzer.

9. Miscellaneous Provisions.

(a) This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed
and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Georgia.

(b) Except as expressly limited by the terms of this
Agreement, all rights, powers, and privileges conferred hereunder shall be
separate, distinct, and cumulative of other powers and rights herein granted and
all other rights which any party may have in law or in equity, and none of them
shall be to the exclusion of any of the others.

(c) No failure or delay of any part to exercise any right
or power given said party hereunder or to insist upon strict compliance by
another party with his obligations hereunder, and no custom or practice of the
parties at variance with the terms hereof shall constitute a modification hereof
or a waiver of any party's right to demand strict compliance with the terms
hereof.

(d) This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
parties hereto with respect to the transaction contemplated herein, and no prior
or contemporaneous

-3-
<PAGE> 4

representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, oral or otherwise,
between the parties not embodied herein shall be of any force or effect.

(e) Subject to any limitations on assignability or
transferability contained herein, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, personal representatives, successors, and assigns.

(f) No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on
any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and
such amendment is executed by all of the parties affected thereby.

(g) Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

(h) If any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement
or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent,
be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application
of such term, covenant, or condition to persons or circumstances other than
those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected
thereby, and each term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement shall be valid
and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.

(i) This Agreement may be executed in several
counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of
which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original, and each of which when
taken together shall constitute but one agreement. This Agreement shall be
effective at such time as all parties hereto have executed a counterpart of this
Agreement.

(j) Any pronouns used herein shall include, when
appropriate, either gender or the neuter form and both singular and plural.

(k) The parties hereto covenant and agree to do such
further acts and things, and to execute and deliver such additional agreements,
documents, and instruments, as may be reasonably necessary from time to time to
implement the terms of this Agreement.

(1) Paragraph headings used herein are for convenience
only and are not to affect the construction of, or be taken into consideration
in interpreting, this Agreement.

(m) Each party hereto warrants and represents that such
party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each
person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents
that he has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such
party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative.

10. Notices. Notices required or permitted hereunder or by law
shall be conclusively deemed given when personally delivered, or on the third
day after posting the same in the United States mail, certified mail, with full
postage prepaid, properly

-4-
<PAGE> 5

addressed to the addressees set out below or at such other addresses as are
specified by written notice delivered in accordance herewith:

SELLER: Cardiac Medical, Inc.
Seven North Parkway Square
4200 Northside Parkway, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30327
Attn: Mr. Roy C. Mallady, Jr.

PURCHASER: Horizon Medical Products, Inc.
Seven North Parkway Square
4200 Northside Parkway, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30327
Attn: Mr. Marshall B. Hunt

with a copy to: Nat G. Slaughter, III
Slaughter & Virgin, P.C.
400 Colony Square; Suite 1110
1201 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30361

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

SELLER: CARDIAC MEDICAL, INC.

By: /s/ Roy C. Mallady, Jr.
--------------------------------
Roy C. Mallady, Jr., President

PURCHASER: HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

By: /s/ Marshall B. Hunt
--------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer

-5-
<PAGE> 6

EXHIBIT "A"

ALL THAT TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND lying and being in Land Lots 215 and 236 of the
17th District of Fulton County, Georgia, and being more particularly described
as follows:

BEGINNING AT A POINT marked by an iron pin found at the intersection of the
southern margin of the right-of-way of Northside Parkway (U.S. Highway No. 41)
(having a right-of-way width of 200 feet) and the land lot line dividing Land
Lots 215 and 236; RUNNING THENCE South 84 degrees 33 minutes East along the
southern margin of the right-of-way of Northside Parkway a distance of 556.75
feet to a point marked by an iron pin found; RUNNING THENCE South 00 degrees 11
minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 511.15 feet to a point marked by an iron
pin in Old Settlement Road on the southern land lot line of Land Lot 215;
RUNNING THENCE South 89 degrees 25 minutes 45 seconds West along the southern
land lot line of Land Lots 215 and 236 a distance of 700.06 feet to a point
marked by an iron pin found; RUNNING THENCE North 09 degrees 59 minutes 25
seconds West a distance of 603.90 feet to a point marked by an iron pin on the
southern margin of the right-of-way of Northside Parkway; RUNNING THENCE South
84 degrees 33 minutes East along the southern margin of the right-of-way of
Northside Parkway a distance of 249.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said
parcel containing 9.497 acres; all as shown and delineated as Tracts "A", "B",
and "C" on plat of survey prepared for DuBose-Jones Company by Charles K.
Browning, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2165, dated September 16,
1982, and revised October 6, 1982.

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.30
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of this 3rd day of April, 1998, by and between Marshall B. Hunt, an
individual resident of the State of Georgia ("Employee"), and Horizon Medical
Products, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Employer").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Employer desires to employ Employee, and Employee
desires to be employed by Employer, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

SECTION 1 EMPLOYMENT.

Subject to the terms hereof, the Employer hereby employs
Employee, and Employee hereby accepts such employment. Employee will serve as
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Employer.
Employee agrees to devote his full business time and best efforts to the
performance of the duties that the Board of Directors of Employer (the "Board of
Directors") may assign Employee from time to time.

SECTION 2 TERM OF EMPLOYMENT.

The term of Employee's employment hereunder (the "Term") shall
be from April 1, 1998, (the "Effective Date") until the earlier of (a) March 31,
2003 or (b) the occurrence of any of the following events:

(i) The death or total disability of Employee (total disability
meaning the failure to fully perform his normal required
services hereunder for a period of six (6) consecutive months
during the Term hereof, as determined by the Board of
Directors, by reason of mental or physical disability);

(ii) The termination by Employer of Employee's employment
hereunder, upon prior written notice to Employee, for "good
cause", as determined by the Board of Directors. For purposes
of this Agreement, "good cause" for termination of Employee's
employment shall exist (A) if Employee is convicted of, pleads
guilty to, or confesses to any felony or any act of fraud,
misappropriation or embezzlement, (B) if Employee has engaged
in a dishonest act to the material damage or prejudice of
Employer or an affiliate of Employer, or in conduct or

<PAGE> 2

activities materially damaging to the business of Employer or
an affiliate of Employer, or (C) if Employee fails to comply
with the terms of this Agreement, and, within ninety (90) days
after written notice from Employer of such failure, Employee
has not corrected such failure or, having once received such
notice of failure and having so corrected such failure,
Employee at any time thereafter again so fails; or

(iii) The termination of this Agreement by either party upon at
least ninety (90) days prior written notice.

SECTION 3 COMPENSATION.

3.1 TERM OF EMPLOYMENT. Employer will provide Employee
with the following salary, expense reimbursement and additional employee
benefits during the term of employment hereunder:

(a) SALARY. Employee will be paid a salary (the "Salary")
of no less than Two Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars
($220,000) per annum, less deductions and
withholdings required by applicable law. The Salary
shall be paid to Employee in equal monthly
installments (or on such more frequent basis as other
executives of Employer are compensated). The Salary
shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
"Compensation Committee") of Employer on at least an
annual basis.

(b) BONUS. Employee will be entitled to an annual bonus
(the "Bonus") equal to 50% of his Salary, based upon
the achievement during each fiscal year of the
Employer during the Term measured at the end of such
year of a 25% or more (but less than 35%) increase in
the earnings per share of the Common Stock from the
earnings per share of the Common Stock calculated on
(x) with respect to the initial year of this
contract, April 1, 1998, and (y) with respect to each
year or period thereafter, the first day of the year
or period for which such Bonus may be paid. If such
increase in earnings per share is 35% or more, then
the Bonus for such year shall equal 100% of
Employee's Salary. Any Bonus earned shall be paid
promptly upon the availability of annual financial
results (which is expected to occur in the second
month of each year). Employee shall also be entitled
to receive a pro rated Bonus, calculated based on the
formula set forth above, for the period commencing
January 1, 2003 and terminating on March 31, 2003
based upon the achievement during such period of an
earnings per share increase of either 25% or 35%, as
described above. The earnings per share calculation
made with respect to the period commencing April 1,
1998 and ending December 31, 1998 shall be based on
the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on a
fully

-2-
<PAGE> 3

diluted basis immediately following the consummation
of Employer's initial public offering of Common
Stock.

(c) CAR ALLOWANCE. Employer shall provide Employee with a
leased automobile during the Term of this Agreement,
the monthly lease payments for which shall not exceed
$1,500.

(d) CLUB DUES. Employee shall be reimbursed the
initiation fees and monthly dues of the Capital City
Club so that this facility may be used for client
entertainment. Additionally, Employee shall be
reimbursed for the dues and expenses incurred by
Employee in connection with his membership in the
Young Presidents Organization.

(e) VACATION. Employee shall receive eight (8) weeks
vacation time per calendar year during the term of
this Agreement. Any unused vacation days in any
calendar year may not be carried over to subsequent
years.

(f) EXPENSES. Employer shall reimburse Employee for all
reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by
Employee at the request of and on behalf of Employer.

(g) BENEFIT PLANS. Employee may participate in such
medical, dental, disability, hospitalization, life
insurance and other benefit plans (such as pension
and profit sharing plans) as Employer maintains from
time to time for the benefit of other executives of
Employer, on the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in such plans. Without limiting the
foregoing, Employer shall pay the premiums on the
disability policies maintained on Employee's behalf
and set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Employer shall
also reimburse Employee with respect to any
reasonable medical and dental expenses incurred by
Employee and/or his immediate family members which
are not reimbursable under the medical and dental
benefit plans maintained by Employer in which
Employee participates.

3.2 EFFECT OF TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL.

(a) Except as hereinafter provided, upon the termination
of the employment of Employee hereunder for any
reason, Employee shall be entitled to all
compensation and benefits earned or accrued under
Section 3.1 as of the effective date of termination
(the "Termination Date"), but from and after the
Termination Date no additional compensation or
benefits shall be earned by Employee hereunder.
Except in the case of a termination of the employment
of Employee pursuant to Section 2(b)(ii) hereof or a
termination by Employee of Employee's employment
pursuant to Section 2(b)(iii) hereof, Employee shall
be deemed to have earned any

-3-
<PAGE> 4

Bonus payable with respect to the calendar year in
which the Termination Date occurs on a prorated basis
(with the Bonus calculated as of the end of the month
in which termination occurs). Any such Bonus shall be
payable on (x) the date on which the Bonus would have
been paid had Employee continued his employment
hereunder if the Termination Date occurs during
December or (y) the 30th day following the end of the
month in which the Termination Date occurs and shall
be calculated as of the end of the month in which the
Termination Date occurs. If Employee's employment
hereunder is terminated by Employer pursuant to
Section 2(b)(iii) hereof, then, in addition to any
other amount payable hereunder, Employer shall
continue to pay Employee his normal Salary pursuant
to Section 3.1(a) for the remainder of the Term
hereunder in periodic payments or in a lump sum, at
the option of Employee, but in no event for less than
three (3) years (on the same basis as if Employee
continued to serve as an employee hereunder for such
period) and Employee shall continue to be eligible to
receive the benefits set forth in Sections 3.1(c) and
3.1(d) above and participate in the benefit plans and
receive the other benefits sets forth in Section
3.1(g) above for such period.

(b) Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control Event (as
defined below) and a termination of Employee's
employment as a result thereof, Employer will pay to
Employee (in lieu of an obligation to make further
payments to Employee under or on account of Section
3.1(a)) the Salary that would have been payable to
Employee under this Agreement for the remainder of
the Term hereunder, but in no event for less than
three years. The amounts payable to Employee under
the previous sentence of this Section 3.2(b) shall be
paid by Employer in periodic payments or in a lump
sum, at the option of Employee. If any payment or
other benefit (a "Termination Payment") received or
to be received by Employee in connection with a
Change in Control Event (whether or not this
Agreement is terminated) or Employee's termination of
employment (whether pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement or any other plan, arrangement or agreement
with Employer, with any person whose actions result
in a Change in Control Event or with any person
affiliated with Employer or such person) is or will
be subject to the tax (the "Excise Tax") imposed
byss. 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), Employer shall pay to Employee
a Gross-Up Payment (as defined below) to the extent
provided by the second paragraph of this Section
3.2(b). A Gross-Up Payment shall be payable pursuant
to this Section 3.2(b) on and subject to the
following terms and conditions:

-4-
<PAGE> 5

(1) At the time the applicable Termination
Payment is made, an additional amount (the
"Gross-Up Payment") shall be paid by
Employer such that the net amount retained
by Employee, after deduction of any Excise
Tax on such Termination Payment and any
federal, state and local income tax,
employment tax and Excise Tax on the
Gross-Up Payment, shall be equal to the
amount or value of such Termination Payment.
For purposes of determining whether any such
Termination Payment will be subject to the
Excise Tax, all Termination Payments shall
be treated as "parachute payments" within
the meaning of ss. 280G(b)(2) of the Code,
and all "excess parachute payments" within
the meaning of ss. 280G(b)(1) of the Code
shall be treated as being subject to the
Excise Tax, unless in the opinion of tax
counsel reasonably acceptable to Employee
and selected by the accounting firm which,
immediately prior to the Change in Control
Event, was Employer's independent auditors,
such payments (in whole or in part) do not
constitute "parachute payments" within the
meaning of ss. 280G of the Code or represent
reasonable compensation for services
actually rendered in excess of the "base
amount" allocable to such reasonable
compensation. The full amount of the
Gross-Up Payment shall be treated as being
subject to the Excise Tax. The value of any
non-cash benefits or any deferred payment or
benefit shall be determined in accordance
with the principles of ss.ss. 280G(d)(3) and
(4) of the Code.

(2) For purposes of determining the amount of
any Gross-Up Payment, Employee shall be
deemed to pay federal income taxes at the
highest marginal rate of federal income
taxation in the calendar year in which the
applicable Termination Payment or Gross-Up
Payment is made, and shall be deemed to pay
state and local income taxes at the highest
marginal rates of taxation in the state and
locality of his residence on the date the
applicable Termination Payment or Gross-Up
Payment is made, net of the maximum
reduction in federal income taxes that could
be obtained from deduction of such state and
local taxes.

(3) If the Excise Tax or income tax payable with
respect to a Gross-Up Payment as finally
determined exceeds the amount taken into
account or paid to Employee at the time the
applicable Termination Payment or Gross-Up
Payment is made (including by reason of any
payment the existence or amount of which
cannot be determined at the time of the
applicable Gross-Up Payment), Employer shall
make an additional Gross-Up Payment in
respect of such excess (plus any interest
payable by Employee with respect

-5-
<PAGE> 6

to such excess) at the time that the amount
of such excess is finally determined.

For purposes of this Agreement a "Change in
Control Event" shall mean the occurrence of
any of the following:

(1) the adoption of a plan of merger or
consolidation of Employer with any other
corporation as a result of which the holders
of the outstanding voting stock of Employer
as a group would receive less than 50% of
the voting stock of the surviving or
resulting corporation, where Employee does
not vote as a director or stockholder of the
Company in favor of such plan;

(2) the adoption of a plan of liquidation or the
approval of the dissolution of Employer,
where Employee does not vote as a director
or stockholder of the Company in favor of
such liquidation or dissolution;

(3) the sale or transfer of substantially all of
the assets of Employer, where Employee does
not vote as a director or stockholder of the
Company for such sale or transfer;

(4) the following individuals cease for any
reason to constitute a majority of the
number of directors then serving:
individuals who, on the date hereof,
constitute the Board of Directors and any
new director (other than a director whose
initial assumption of office is in
connection with an actual or threatened
election contest, including but not limited
to a consent solicitation relating to the
election of directors of Employer) whose
appointment or election by the Board of
Directors or nomination for election by
Employer's stockholders was approved or
recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds
(2/3) of the directors then still in office
who either were directors on the date hereof
or whose appointment, election or nomination
for election was previously so approved or
recommended; or

(5) any individual, entity, group (within the
meaning of ss. 13(d)(3) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
rules promulgated thereunder), or other
person acquires in a single transaction or a
series of transactions more than 30% of the
outstanding shares of Employer's Common
Stock, where Employee is not such person or
individual or is not an Affiliate (as
defined in Rule 405 of under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended) of such entity or a
part of such group.

-6-
<PAGE> 7

SECTION 4 MISCELLANEOUS.

4.1 SEVERABILITY. The covenants in this Agreement shall be
construed as covenants independent of one another and as obligations distinct
from any other contract between Employee and Employer. Any claim that Employee
may have against Employer shall not constitute a defense to enforcement by
Employer of this Agreement.

4.2 NOTICES. Any notice or other document to be given
hereunder by any party hereto to any other party hereto shall be in writing and
delivered in person or by courier, by telecopy transmission or sent by any
express mail service, postage or fees prepaid at the following addresses:

EMPLOYER

Seven North Parkway Square
4200 Northside Parkway, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30327
Attn: President

EMPLOYEE

Marshall B. Hunt
3935 Paces Manor
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
(770) 433-1226

or at such other address or number for a party as shall be specified by like
notice. Any notice which is delivered in the manner provided herein shall be
deemed to have been duly given to the party to whom it is directed upon actual
receipt by such party or its agent.

4.3 BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement inures to the benefit of,
and is binding upon, Employer and their respective successors and assigns, and
Employee, together with Employee's executor, administrator, personal
representative, heirs, and legatees.

4.4 ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement is intended by the parties
hereto to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subject
matter hereof and is the complete and exclusive statement of the terms thereof,
notwithstanding any representations, statements or agreements to the contrary
heretofore made. This Agreement supersedes and terminates all prior employment
and compensation agreements, arrangements and understandings between or among
Employer and Employee. This Agreement may be modified only by a written
instrument signed by all of the parties hereto.

4.5 GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made
in, and in all respects shall be interpreted, construed, and governed by and in
accordance with, the laws of

-7-
<PAGE> 8

the State of Georgia. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed against
or interpreted to the disadvantage of any party hereto by any court or other
governmental or judicial authority or by any board of arbitrators by reason of
such party or its counsel having or being deemed to have structured or drafted
such provision.

4.6 HEADINGS. The section and paragraph headings contained in
this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way
the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

4.7 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. Each party hereto hereby agrees that
any remedy at law for any breach of the provisions contained in this Agreement
shall be inadequate and that the other parties hereto shall be entitled to
specific performance and any other appropriate injunctive relief in addition to
any other remedy such party might have under this Agreement or at law or in
equity.

4.8 COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in two or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the date first above written.

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

By: /s/ William E. Peterson, Jr.
-----------------------------
(printed name)

EMPLOYEE

/s/ Marshall B. Hunt
--------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt

-8-

<PAGE> 9

EXHIBIT A

MARSHALL HUNT

DISABILITY INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

COMPANY NAME POLICY # FACE AMOUNT PREMIUM
- ------------------- -------- ------------ ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Northwestern Mutual D296528 $3,000/Month $1,456.80
Northwestern Mutual D308929 $2,000/Month $ 772.40
Northwestern Mutual D874280 $8,000/Month $2,496.96
Provident L&A 7088795 $2,000/Month $ 588.70
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 1
EXHIBIT 10.31

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered
into as of this 3rd day of April, 1998, by and between William E. Peterson, Jr.,
an individual resident of the State of Georgia ("Employee"), and Horizon Medical
Products, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Employer").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, Employer desires to employ Employee, and Employee
desires to be employed by Employer, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending
to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

Section 1 Employment.

Subject to the terms hereof, the Employer hereby employs
Employee, and Employee hereby accepts such employment. Employee will serve as
President of Employer. Employee agrees to devote his full business time and best
efforts to the performance of the duties that the Board of Directors of Employer
(the "Board of Directors") or the Chief Executive Officer of Employer may assign
Employee from time to time.

Section 2 Term of Employment.

The term of Employee's employment hereunder (the "Term") shall
be from April 1, 1998 (the "Effective Date") until the earlier of (a) March 31,
2003 or (b) the occurrence of any of the following events:

<PAGE> 2

(iii) The termination of this Agreement by either party upon at
least ninety (90) days prior written notice.

Section 3 Compensation.

3.1 Term of Employment. Employer will provide Employee with
the following salary, expense reimbursement and additional employee benefits
during the term of employment hereunder:

(a) Salary. Employee will be paid a salary (the "Salary")
of no less than One Hundred Ninety Thousand Dollars
($190,000) per annum, less deductions and
withholdings required by applicable law. The Salary
shall be paid to Employee in equal monthly
installments (or on such more frequent basis as other
executives of Employer are compensated). The Salary
shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
"Compensation Committee") of Employer on at least an
annual basis.

(b) Bonus. Employee will be entitled to an annual bonus
(the "Bonus") equal to 50% of his Salary, based upon
the achievement during each fiscal year of the
Employer during the Term measured at the end of such
year of a 25% or more (but less than 35%) increase in
the earnings per share of the Common Stock from the
earnings per share of the Common Stock calculated on
(x) with respect to the initial year of this
contract, April 1, 1998, and (y) with respect to each
year or period thereafter, the first day of the year
or period for which such Bonus may be paid. If such
increase in earnings per share is 35% or more, then
the Bonus for such year shall equal 100% of
Employee's Salary. Any Bonus earned shall be paid
promptly upon the availability of annual financial
results (which is expected to occur in the second
month of each year). Employee shall also be entitled
to receive a pro rated Bonus, calculated based on the
formula set forth above, for the period commencing
January 1, 2003 and terminating on March 31, 2003
based upon the achievement during such period of an
earnings per share increase of either 25% or 35%, as
described above. The earnings per share calculation
made with respect to the period commencing April 1,
1998 and ending December 31, 1998 shall be based on
the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on a
fully

-2-

<PAGE> 3

diluted basis immediately following the consummation
of Employer's initial public offering of Common
Stock.

(c) Car Allowance. Employer shall provide Employee with a
leased automobile during the Term of this Agreement,
the monthly lease payments for which shall not exceed
$1,500.

(d) Club Dues. Employee shall be reimbursed the
initiation fees and monthly dues of Marietta Country
Club or such other country club as Employee and
Employer shall approve so that this facility may be
used for client entertainment. Additionally, Employer
shall make an annual contribution, in Employee's
name, of $5,000 to the Florida State University Club
for membership in the Golden Chief Club.

(e) Vacation. Employee shall receive eight (8) weeks
vacation time per calendar year during the term of
this Agreement. Any unused vacation days in any
calendar year may not be carried over to subsequent
years.

(f) Expenses. Employer shall reimburse Employee for all
reasonable and necessary expenses incurred by
Employee at the request of and on behalf of Employer.

(g) Benefit Plans. Employee may participate in such
medical, dental, disability, hospitalization, life
insurance and other benefit plans (such as pension
and profit sharing plans) as Employer maintains from
time to time for the benefit of other executives of
Employer, on the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in such plans. Without limiting the
foregoing, Employer shall pay the premiums on the
disability policies maintained on Employee's behalf
and set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Employer shall
also reimburse Employee with respect to any
reasonable medical and dental expenses incurred by
Employee and/or his immediate family members which
are not reimbursable under the medical and dental
benefit plans maintained by Employer in which
Employee participates.

3.2 Effect of Termination or Change of Control.

-3-

<PAGE> 4

Section 2(b)(iii) hereof, Employee shall be deemed to
have earned any Bonus payable with respect to the
calendar year in which the Termination Date occurs on
a prorated basis (with the Bonus calculated as of the
end of the month in which termination occurs). Any
such Bonus shall be payable on (x) the date on which
the Bonus would have been paid had Employee continued
his employment hereunder if the Termination Date
occurs during December or (y) the 30th day following
the end of the month in which the Termination Date
occurs and shall be calculated as of the end of the
month in which the Termination Date occurs. If
Employee's employment hereunder is terminated by
Employer pursuant to Section 2(b)(iii) hereof, then,
in addition to any other amount payable hereunder,
Employer shall continue to pay Employee his normal
Salary pursuant to Section 3.1(a) for the remainder
of the Term hereunder in periodic payments or in a
lump sum, at the Option of Employee, but in no event
for less than three (3) years (on the same basis as
if Employee continued to serve as an employee
hereunder for such period) and Employee shall
continue to be eligible to receive the benefits set
forth in Sections 3.1(c) and 3.1(d) above and
participate in the benefit plans and receive the
other benefits sets forth in Section 3.1(g) above for
such period.

(b) Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control Event (as
defined below) and a termination of Employee's
employment as a result thereof, Employer will pay to
Employee (in lieu of an obligation to make further
payments to Employee under or on account of Section
3.1(a)) the Salary that would have been payable to
Employee under this Agreement for the lesser of (x) a
period of three years from the date of termination or
(y) the remainder of the Term hereunder, but in no
event for less than three years. The amounts payable
to Employee under the previous sentence of this
Section 3.2(b) shall be paid by Employer in periodic
payments or in a lump sum, at the option of Employee.
If any payment or other benefit (a "Termination
Payment") received or to be received by Employee in
connection with a Change in Control Event (whether or
not this Agreement is terminated) or Employee's
termination of employment (whether pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement or any other plan,
arrangement or agreement with Employer, with any
person whose actions result in a Change in Control
Event or with any person affiliated with Employer or
such person) is or will be subject to the tax (the
"Excise Tax") imposed byss. 4999 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
Employer shall pay to Employee a Gross-Up Payment (as
defined below) to the extent provided by the second
paragraph of this Section 3.2(b). A Gross-Up Payment
shall be payable pursuant to this Section 3.2(b) on
and subject to the following terms and conditions:

-4-

<PAGE> 5

-5-

<PAGE> 6

to such excess) at the time that the amount
of such excess is finally determined.

For purposes of this Agreement a "Change in
Control Event" shall mean the occurrence of
any of the following:

(3) the sale or transfer of substantially all of
the assets of Employer, where Employee does
not vote as a director or stockholder of the
Company for such sale or transfer;

(5) any individual, entity, group (within the
meaning ofss. 13(d)(3) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
rules promulgated thereunder), or other
person acquires in a single transaction or a
series of transactions more than 30% of the
outstanding shares of Employer's Common
Stock, where Employee is not such person or
individual or is not an Affiliate (as
defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended) of such entity or a
part of such group.

-6-

<PAGE> 7

Section 4 Miscellaneous.

4.1 Severability. The covenants in this Agreement shall be
construed as covenants independent of one another and as obligations distinct
from any other contract between Employee and Employer. Any claim that Employee
may have against Employer shall not constitute a defense to enforcement by
Employer of this Agreement.

4.2 Notices. Any notice or other document to be given
hereunder by any party hereto to any other party hereto shall be in writing and
delivered in person or by courier, by telecopy transmission or sent by any
express mail service, postage or fees prepaid at the following addresses:

EMPLOYER

Seven North Parkway Square
4200 Northside Parkway, N.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30327
Attn: Chief Executive Officer

EMPLOYEE

William E. Peterson, Jr.
1771 Benning Field Drive
Marietta, Georgia 30067
(770) 425-6421

4.3 Binding Effect. This Agreement inures to the benefit of,
and is binding upon, Employer and their respective successors and assigns, and
Employee, together with Employee's executor, administrator, personal
representative, heirs, and legatees.

4.4 Entire Agreement This Agreement is intended by the parties
hereto to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subject
matter hereof and is the complete and exclusive statement of the terms thereof,
notwithstanding any representations, statements or agreements to the contrary
heretofore made. This Agreement supersedes and terminates all prior employment
and compensation agreements, arrangements and understandings between or among
Employer and Employee. This Agreement may be modified only by a written
instrument signed by all of the parties hereto.

-7-

<PAGE> 8

4.5 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made
in, and in all respects shall be interpreted, construed, and governed by and in
accordance with, the laws of the State of Georgia. No provision of this
Agreement shall be construed against or interpreted to the disadvantage of any
party hereto by any court or other governmental or judicial authority or by any
board of arbitrators by reason of such party or its counsel having or being
deemed to have structured or drafted such provision.

4.6 Headings. The section and paragraph headings contained in
this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way
the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

4.7 Specific Performance. Each party hereto hereby agrees that
any remedy at law for any breach of the provisions contained in this Agreement
shall be inadequate and that the other parties hereto shall be entitled to
specific performance and any other appropriate injunctive relief in addition to
any other remedy such party might have under this Agreement or at law or in
equity.

4.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in two or
more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the date first above written.

HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

By: /s/ Marshall B. Hunt
------------------------------------------
(printed name)

EMPLOYEE

/s/ William E. Peterson, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
William E. Peterson, Jr.

-8-

<PAGE> 9

EXHIBIT A

WILLIAM PETERSON

DISABILITY INCOME

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company Name Policy # Face Amount Premium
------------ -------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Northwestern Mutual D564707 $3,725/Month $1,830.10
Northwestern Mutual D677420 $ 875/Month $ 423.94
Northwestern Mutual D750477 $2,197/Month $1,167.23
Northwestern Mutual D1192808 $ 683/Month $ 510.89
</TABLE>

<PAGE> 1

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-46349) of our report dated January 29, 1998, except as to Note 16
as to which the date is March 22, 1998, on our audits of the financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Horizon Medical Products, Inc.
and to the inclusion of our report dated September 15, 1997 except as of and for
the period ended June 30, 1997 for which the date is March 21, 1998, on our
audits of the financial statements of Strato/Infusaid Inc. We also consent to
the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and "Selected Financial
Data."

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Birmingham, Alabama

April 8, 1998

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HORIZON
MEDICAL PRODUCTS CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM S-1.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1997
<CASH> 2,893,924
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 4,028,270
<ALLOWANCES> 308,239
<INVENTORY> 5,405,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 12,956,151
<PP&E> 2,735,645
<DEPRECIATION> 394,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 31,576,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 6,113,585
<BONDS> 36,434,124<F1>
0
0
<COMMON> 9,419
<OTHER-SE> (11,159,174)<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 31,576,905
<SALES> 15,798,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 15,798,123
<CGS> 6,273,418
<TOTAL-COSTS> 12,749,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (69,727)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 11,970,734<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX> (8,852,129)
<INCOME-TAX> 319,831
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (9,171,960)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (9,171,960)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (.97)
<EPS-DILUTED> (.97)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 11,000,000 OF PUT WARRANT OBLIGATION AND 1,463,319 OF NON COMPETE
LIABILITIES.
<F2>INCLUDES 8,000,000 OF PUT WARRANT VALUE ACCRETION
</FN>

</TABLE>