FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

For the quarter period ended                                                        March 2, 2000                                                                                            

For the transition period from                                                                   to                                                                           

Commission File No.                                                        333-XXXX                                                                                      

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes      X      No           

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes            No           

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

     The Company has a $60 million Credit Facility (the "Credit Facility") which matures on February 26, 2004. The Credit Facility includes a $10 million equipment loan facility restricted to the purchase of property, plant and equipment and a $50 million revolving credit facility. Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at rates as defined in the agreement. Amounts available to borrow under the equipment loan facility are limited to the first three loan years. Amounts available to borrow under the revolving credit facility vary depending on domestic accounts receivable, inventory and equipment balances, which serve as collateral along with substantially all of the other assets of the Company. The Credit Facility restricts the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of its assets or to enter into any merger or consolidation. In February 2000, the Credit Facility was amended to allow for a loan from certain of the Company's shareholders (See Note 6). The Credit Facility also contains a covenant requiring that the Company maintain a fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0, provided, however, that this fixed charge ratio covenant will not be applied to any fiscal quarter during the term as long as the gross borrowing availability exceeds $10.0 million. As of April 6, 2000, the Company had a $30.2 million outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility and $15.7 million of gross availability, of which $5.7 million was available to borrow without triggering the fixed charge ratio covenant. Had the Company been required to test the fixed charge ratio, the test would not have been satisfied. As of April 6, 2000, the Company had a $4.0 million outstanding balance on the equipment loan facility and $6.0 million of availability under the equipment loan facility. Any default under the Credit Facility could result in default of the Fixed Rate Notes, Floating Rate Notes and Redeemable Preferred Stock.

     On February 29, 2000, the Company entered into an $8.7 million loan agreement with certain shareholders of the Company. The loans are evidenced by separate note agreements with the participating shareholders (the "Notes from Shareholders"). The Notes from Shareholders mature on February 27, 2004, subject to earlier prepayment, provided that all amounts due under the Credit Facility have been paid in full and all commitments under the Credit Facility have been terminated. Interest accrues at 90 day LIBOR + 3.25% (9.38% at March 2, 2000), subject to adjustment, if the interest rate under the Credit Facility is ever increased. Interest is payable monthly if a fiscal month's fixed charge ratio, as defined, exceeds 1.1 to 1.0, so long as no event of default has occurred under the Credit Facility or would occur as a result of an interest payment under this loan. Otherwise, interest is payable upon maturity of the notes. For the fiscal month ended March 2, 2000, the fixed charge ratio did not exceed 1.1 to 1.0.

     The Redeemable Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption on March 1, 2010 and has a liquidation preference of $100 per share. The holders of Redeemable Preferred Stock are entitled to a cumulative 12-1/2% annual dividend based upon the liquidation preference per share of Redeemable Preferred Stock, payable quarterly. To date, the Company has paid all dividends in-kind.

     Basic loss per share is computed using net loss increased by dividends on the Redeemable Preferred Stock divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding. Common stock equivalent shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and shares issuable upon the conversion of outstanding convertible securities and affect earnings per share only when they have a dilutive effect. The Company's basic loss per share and its fully diluted loss per share were the same for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000 and March 4, 1999, respectively, because of the antidilutive effect of outstanding convertible securities and stock options.

The Company had income tax expense of $30,000 for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000 compared to a benefit of $1.7 million and $3.5 million for the three and six months ended March 4, 1999, respectively. The income tax expense for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, resulted from a mandatory minimum foreign income tax on its Mexican subsidiary. The effective rate of tax expense for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000 was 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively, compared to an income tax benefit of 31.6% and 37.1% for the three and six months ended March 4, 1999, respectively. The effective tax rate for each of fiscal 2000 and 1999 primarily reflects the statutory corporate income tax rate, the net effect of state taxation, the effect of a tax holiday granted to the Company's Malaysian operation and a valuation allowance. The overall decrease in the effective rate for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, relative to the corresponding periods of fiscal 1999, was primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance. During the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, the Company's valuation allowance increased by $4.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively, to $11.7 million, which eliminates the income tax benefit that would have otherwise resulted from the losses. The Company does not provide for U.S. tax on the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries and, therefore, the effective rate may vary significantly from period to period.

 10.    Comprehensive Loss

The Company's comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive loss was $9,095,000 and $14,338,000 for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, respectively. Comprehensive loss was $4,481,000 and $6,571,000 for the three and six months ended March 4, 1999, respectively. The accumulated balance of foreign currency translation adjustments, excluded from net loss, is presented in the consolidated balance sheet as "Accumulated other comprehensive loss."

     MCMS provides services on both a turnkey and consignment basis. Under a consignment arrangement, the OEM procures the components and the Company assembles and tests them in exchange for a service fee. Under a turnkey arrangement, the Company assumes responsibility for both the procurement of components and their assembly. Turnkey manufacturing generates higher net sales than consignment manufacturing due to the generation of revenue from materials as well as labor and manufacturing overhead. Turnkey manufacturing also typically results in lower gross margins than consignment manufacturing. Consignment revenues accounted for 8.4% and 9.4% of the Company's net sales for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, respectively.

     Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $17.2 million, or 14.8%, to $99.1 million from $116.3 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. The decrease in net sales is primarily the result of lower sales to Fore Systems, Inc. ("Fore Systems"), who was historically the Company's second largest customer and the largest customer of the Durham, North Carolina operation. Net sales to Fore Systems for the three months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $20.9 million to $6.9 million from $27.8 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. The Company currently anticipates that it will complete manufacturing services for Fore Systems during the third quarter of fiscal 2000. The decrease in net sales to Fore Systems was partially offset by growth in demand for complex PCBA's and consigned memory modules.

     Net sales attributable to foreign subsidiaries totaled $18.8 million for the three months ended March 2, 2000, compared to $7.1 million for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. The growth in foreign subsidiary net sales is primarily the result of increased complex PCBA shipments at the Company's Malaysia operation. The Company's Monterrey, Mexico operation completed its first customer qualification and ISO9002 certification during the three months ended March 2, 2000 and anticipates its first sales early in the third quarter of fiscal 2000.

     Gross Profit. Gross profit for the three months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $2.9 million, or 48.3%, to $3.1 million from $6.0 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. Gross margin for the three months ended March 2, 2000 decreased to 3.1% of net sales from 5.2% for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. Gross profit and gross margin were adversely affected by reduced capacity utilization at the Durham, North Carolina operation due to the significant decline in sales to Fore Systems, start-up costs at the Monterrey, Mexico operation and lower prices on complex PCBA's. Gross profit and gross margins may continue to be affected by these factors.

     Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") for the three months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $0.1 million, or 1.5%, to $6.7 million from $6.8 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. The decrease for the three months ended March 2, 2000 was primarily the result of a decrease in non-cash foreign currency expense of $0.7 million, offset in part by an additional $0.4 million of start-up costs associated with the Company's recently established Monterrey, Mexico operation. The non-cash foreign currency expense primarily relates to an intercompany loan between the Company and its Belgian subsidiary. During the three months ended March 2, 2000, the Company established an engineering and prototype operation in the Silicon Valley to attract and support new and existing customers. Although the Company has not yet incurred significant start-up costs associated with the Silicon Valley operation, the Company has entered into a long-term lease for a facility, which commenced in March 2000.

     Interest expense. Interest expense for the three months ended March 2, 2000 increased by $0.5 million, or 10.2%, to $5.4 million from $4.9 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. The increase was primarily due to higher interest rates on the Company's variable interest rate borrowings.

     Provision for Income Taxes. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 2, 2000 was $30,000 compared to a benefit of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. The income tax expense for the three months ended March 2, 2000 resulted from a mandatory minimum foreign income tax on its Mexican subsidiary. The effective rate of tax expense for the three months ended March 2, 2000 was 0.3%, compared to an income tax benefit of 31.6% for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. The overall decrease in the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 2, 2000, relative to the corresponding period of fiscal 1999, was primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance. During the three months ended March 2, 2000, the valuation allowance eliminated any income tax benefit that would have otherwise resulted from the losses. The Company does not provide for U.S. tax on the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries and, therefore, the effective rate may vary significantly from period to period.

     Extraordinary loss. The extraordinary after tax loss of the $0.6 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999 resulted from the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the early retirement of a revolving credit facility.

     Net Loss. For the reasons stated above, the net loss for the three months ended March 2, 2000 increased by $4.4 million to $9.0 million from $4.6 million for the three months ended March 4, 1999. As a percentage of net sales, net loss for the three months ended March 2, 2000 was 9.1% compared to 3.9% for the three months ended March 4, 1999.

     Net Sales. Net sales for the six months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $8.5 million, or 4.1%, to $199.1 million from $207.6 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. The decrease in net sales is primarily the result of lower sales to Fore Systems.. Net sales to Fore Systems for the six months ended March 2, 2000 decreased $25.0 million to $19.4 million from $44.4 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. The Company anticipates that it will complete manufacturing services for Fore Systems during the third quarter of fiscal 2000. The decrease in net sales to Fore Systems was partially offset by growth in demand for complex PCBA's and consigned memory modules.

     Net sales attributable to foreign subsidiaries totaled $37.3 million for the six months ended March 2, 2000, compared to $14.2 million for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. The growth in foreign subsidiary net sales is primarily the result of increased complex PCBA shipments at the Company's Malaysia operation. Sales from the Company's Monterrey, Mexico operation commenced early in the third quarter of fiscal 2000.

     Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended March 2, 2000 decreased by $2.0 million, or 17.9%, to $9.2 million from $11.2 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. Gross margin for the six months ended March 2, 2000 decreased to 4.6% of net sales from 5.4% for the corresponding period of fiscal 1999. Gross profit and gross margin were adversely affected by several factors, including lower prices on PCBA's, reduced capacity utilization at the Durham, North Carolina operation due to the significant decline in sales to Fore Systems, start-up costs at the Monterrey, Mexico operation. Gross profit and gross margins may continue to be affected by these factors.

     Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A expenses for the six months ended March 2, 2000 increased by $1.6 million, or 14.5%, to $12.6 million from $11.0 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. This increase was primarily the result of additional expenses in program management, information technology and executive management to support the Company's global expansion and anticipated growth. In addition, the Company incurred $0.5 million of start-up costs associated with the Company's recently established Monterrey, Mexico operation during the six months ended March 2, 2000. During the six months ended March 2, 2000, the Company established an engineering and prototype operation in the Silicon Valley to attract and support new and existing customers. Although the Company has not yet incurred significant start-up costs associated with the Silicon Valley operation, the Company has entered into a long-term lease for a facility, which commenced in March 2000.

     Interest expense. Interest expense for the six months ended March 2, 2000 increased $1.1 million, or 11.5%, to $10.7 million from $9.6 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. The increase was primarily due to higher levels of borrowing under the Company's credit facility and higher interest rates on the Company's variable interest rate borrowings.

     Extraordinary loss. The extraordinary after tax loss of the $0.6 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999 resulted from the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the early retirement of a revolving credit facility.

     Net Loss. For the reasons stated above, net loss for the six months ended March 2, 2000 increased by $7.5 million to a loss of $14.1 million from a loss of $6.6 million for the six months ended March 4, 1999. As a percentage of net sales, net loss for the six months ended March 2, 2000 was 7.1% compared to 3.2% for the six months ended March 4, 1999.

     During the first six months of fiscal 2000, net cash consumed by operating activities was $3.6 million. Net cash used by investing activities was $4.1 million and net cash provided by financing activities was $7.7 million. Exchange rate changes had a nominal effect on cash. Net cash used by investing activities during the first six months of fiscal 2000 primarily consisted of capital expenditures of $4.1 million to upgrade and establish facilities and expand manufacturing capacity in Malaysia and Mexico. Net cash generated from financing activities primarily resulted from an $8.7 million loan from certain of the Company's stockholders, off-set in part by repayments on the Company's existing credit facility and other debt..

     The $3.6 million of cash consumed by operations during the six months ended March 2, 2000 was primarily the result of a net loss of $14.1 million during the period. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis." The net loss included $9.0 million in non-cash depreciation and amortization. Changes in assets and liabilities generated cash from operating activities totaling $1.5 million, which was primarily due to a $15.7 million reduction in the Company's accounts receivable, offset in part by a $12.5 million increase in inventory. For the six months ended March 2, 2000, the average accounts receivable collection period and the average inventory turns were 37.9 days and 7.6 turns, respectively, compared to 37.8 days and 11.5 turns, respectively, for the corresponding period in fiscal 1999. For the three months ended March 2, 2000, the average accounts receivable collection period and the average inventory turns were 34.2 days and 7.1 turns, respectively, compared to 41.2 days and 7.9 turns, respectively, for the three months ended December 2, 1999. The average collection period and average inventory turn levels vary, among other things, as a function of sales volume, sales volatility, product mix, payment terms with customers and suppliers and the mix of consigned and turnkey business.

     The Company has a $60 million credit facility (the "Credit Facility") which matures on February 26, 2004. The Credit Facility includes a $10 million equipment loan facility restricted to the purchase of property, plant and equipment and a $50 million revolving credit facility. Amounts available to borrow under the revolving credit facility vary depending on domestic accounts receivable, inventory and equipment balances, which serve as collateral along with substantially all of the other assets of the Company. The Credit Facility restricts the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of its assets or to enter into any merger or consolidation. In February 2000, the Credit Facility was amended to allow for a loan from certain of the Company's shareholders. The Credit Facility also contains a covenant requiring that the Company maintain a fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0, provided, however, that this fixed charge ratio covenant will not be applied to any fiscal quarter during the term as long as the gross borrowing availability exceeds $10.0 million. As of April 6, 2000, the Company had a $30.2 million outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility and $15.7 million of gross availability, of which $5.7 million was available to borrow without triggering the fixed charge ratio covenant. Had the Company been required to test the fixed charge ratio, the test would not have been satisfied. As of April 6, 2000, the Company had a $4.0 million outstanding balance under the equipment loan facility and $6.0 million of availability under the Credit Facility.

     On February 29, 2000, the Company received $8.7 million under a loan agreement with certain shareholders of the Company. The loans are evidenced by separate note agreements with the participating shareholders (the "Notes from Shareholders"). The Notes from Shareholders mature on February 27, 2004, subject to earlier prepayment, provided that all amounts due under the Credit Facility have been paid in full and all commitments under the Credit Facility have been terminated. Interest accrues at 90-day LIBOR + 3.25% (9.38% at March 2, 2000), subject to adjustment, if the interest rate under the Credit Facility is ever increased. Interest is payable monthly if a fiscal month's fixed charge ratio, as defined, exceeds 1.1 to 1.0, so long as no event of default has occurred under the Credit Facility or would occur as a result of an interest payment under this loan. Otherwise, interest is payable upon maturity of the notes. For the fiscal month ended March 2, 2000, the fixed charge ratio did not exceed 1.1 to 1.0.

     The Company's principal sources of future liquidity are cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under the Credit Facility. The Company experienced lower than anticipated levels of profitability and cash flows from operating activities and higher than anticipated levels of borrowing during the first six months of fiscal 2000. The Company has implemented a number of initiatives to accelerate working capital turns, improve manufacturing efficiencies and control operating expenses, all of which it believes will improve its liquidity. The Company believes that future cash flows from operating activities and availability under its Credit Facility should provide sufficient liquidity to meet its current and future interest payments, working capital and capital expenditure obligations. If cash flows from operating activities and availability under the Credit Facility are not sufficient to meet these obligations, the Company may require additional equity or debt financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when required. See "Certain Factors--High Level of Indebtedness; Ability to Service Indebtedness and Satisfy Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements."

     To date, the Company has not experienced any material disruption caused by the failure of the Company's ERP system or any of its "mission critical" information systems to be Year 2000 compliant. In addition, the Company has not experienced, to date, any material disruption caused by the failure of any supplier or customer to be Year 2000 compliant. Total costs, whether capitalized or expensed, associated with the implementation of the Company's ERP system, as well as system modifications, were approximately $11.8 million, including $0.4 million during the first six months of fiscal 2000. This amount includes costs associated with the implementation of new systems for Year 2000 compliance even though such compliance was not the primary reason for installation.

     In addition to factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in other Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following are important factors which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the historical results of the Company's operations or those results or events contemplated in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company.

     The level of the Company's indebtedness could have important consequences to the Company and the holders of the Company's securities, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) a substantial portion of the Company's cash flow from operations must be dedicated to debt service and will not be available for other purposes; (ii) the Company's ability to obtain additional financing in the future, as needed, may be limited; (iii) the Company's leveraged position and covenants contained in the Indenture, the Certificate of Designation, the Exchange Indenture, the Notes from Shareholders and the Credit Facility may limit its ability to grow and make capital improvements and acquisitions; (iv) the Company's level of indebtedness may make it more vulnerable to economic downturns; and (v) the Company may be at a competitive disadvantage because some of the Company's competitors are less financially leveraged, resulting in greater operational and financial flexibility for such competitors.

     The ability of the Company to pay cash dividends on, and to satisfy the redemption obligations in respect of, the Redeemable Preferred Stock and to satisfy its debt obligations, including the Notes, will be primarily dependent upon the future financial and operating performance of the Company. Such performance is dependent upon the Company's rate of growth and profitability and the ability of the Company to manage its working capital effectively, including its inventory turns and accounts receivable collection period. The Company's principal sources of future liquidity are cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under its Credit Facility. The Company experienced lower than anticipated levels of profitability and cash flows from operating activities and higher than anticipated levels of borrowing during the first six months of fiscal 2000. The Company has implemented a number of initiatives to accelerate working capital turns, improve manufacturing efficiencies and control operating expenses, all of which it believes will improve its liquidity. The Company believes that future cash flows from operating activities and availability under its Credit Facility should provide sufficient liquidity to meet its current and future interest payments, working capital and capital expenditure obligations. If cash flows from operating activities and availability under the Credit Facility are not sufficient to meet these obligations, the Company may require additional equity or debt financing. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on satisfactory terms when required. The Company's future operating performance and ability to service or refinance the Notes and to repay, extend or refinance the Credit Facility and Notes from Shareholders will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its debt service obligations or provide adequate long-term liquidity, it will have to pursue one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, refinancing debt, reducing its workforce, closing a site, selling assets or raising equity capital. There can be no assurance that such alternatives could be accomplished on satisfactory terms, if at all, or in a timely manner.

     The Indenture, the Certificate of Designation, the Exchange Indenture, the Notes from Shareholders and the Credit Facility contain certain covenants that restrict, among other things, the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, consummate certain assets sales and purchases, issue preferred stock, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, merge or consolidate with any other person or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, none of which impaired the Company's ability to conduct business in the first six months of fiscal 2000. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the Credit Facility, the Notes from Shareholders, the Indenture and the Exchange Indenture and would violate certain provisions of the Certificate of Designation. The Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring that the Company maintain a fixed charge ratio of not less than 1.0 to 1.0, provided, however, that this fixed charge ratio covenant will not be applied to any fiscal quarter during the term as long as the gross borrowing availability under the Credit Facility exceeds $10.0 million. As of March 2, 2000, had the Company been required to test the fixed charge ratio, the test would not have satisfied. In the event the Company does not meet such tests, the availability of capital from bank borrowings, including but not limited to the ability to access the Credit Facility, could be adversely affected. The inability to borrow under the Credit Facility could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     Upon an event of default under the Credit Facility, the Loan from Shareholders, the Indenture or the Exchange Indenture, the lenders thereunder could elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. In the case of the Credit Facility, if the Company were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders thereunder could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. Such collateral is comprised of substantially all of the tangible and intangible assets of the Company, including the capital stock and membership interests of its subsidiary stock.

     The Company believes that, in order to achieve its long-term growth objectives and maintain and enhance its competitive position, it will need significant financial resources over the next several years for capital expenditures, including investments in manufacturing capacity and capabilities, management information systems, working capital and debt service. The Company has added manufacturing capacity and incurred significant capital expenditures over the last several years. Most recently, the Company leased a facility in the Silicon Valley (March 2000), which will be used as an engineering and prototype operation to attract and support new and existing customers. In addition, the Company completed an expansion of the Penang, Malaysia operations (September 1999) and leased a new facility in Monterrey, Mexico (October 1999). The precise amount and timing of the Company's future funding needs cannot be determined at this time and will depend upon a number of factors, including the demand for the Company's services and the Company's management of its working capital. The Company may not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient capital, it could be required to reduce or delay its capital expenditures and facilities expansion, which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources."

     At any given time, certain customers may account for significant portions of the Company's net sales. For the first six months of fiscal 2000, approximately 78% of net sales were derived from customers in the networking and telecommunications industries. For the three months and six months ended March 2, 2000, the Company's ten largest customers accounted for approximately 90% and 88%, respectively, of net sales. The Company's top customer accounted for approximately 43% and 41% of net sales in the three and six months ended March 2, 2000, respectively. Another customer accounted for approximately 11% of net sales for the three months ended March 2, 2000. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated sales for the three and six months ended March 2, 2000. Throughout fiscal 1999 and through the first three months of fiscal 2000, Fore Systems had accounted for greater than 10% of consolidated sales.The Company anticipates that it will complete manufacturing services for Fore Systems during the third quarter of fiscal 2000.

     The Company has another major customer that operates under a consignment manufacturing model and, while sales are less than 10% of total revenue, the customer makes an important contribution to the Company's overall financial performance. Moreover, the Company has significant customer concentration at a site level. Prior to the first six months of fiscal 2000, Fore Systems was a significant customer of the Durham, North Carolina operation. As a result of the decline in sales to Fore Systems, gross margins at the Durham, North Carolina operation have been and will continue to be affected until the Company establishes new customers to replace Fore Systems. Volatility in demand from other major customers may also lead to reduced site capacity utilization and have a negative effect on the Company's gross margin. Decreases in sales to or margins with these or any other key customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Results of Operations."

     The Company expects to continue to depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant percentage of its net sales. There can be no assurance that the Company's principal customers will continue to purchase services at current levels, if at all. The percentage of the Company's sales to these customers may fluctuate from period-to-period. Significant reductions in sales to any of the Company's major customers as well as period-to-period fluctuations in sales and changes in product mix ordered by such customers may result in the Company reducing its workforce, reallocating manufacturing demand or closing a site, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     In addition, the Company is dependent upon the continued growth, viability and financial stability of its OEM customers, which are in turn substantially dependent on the growth of the networking, telecommunications, computer systems and other industries. These industries are subject to rapid technological change, product obsolescence and price competition. Many of the Company's customers in these industries are affected by general economic conditions. Currency devaluations and economic slowdowns may have an adverse effect on the results of operations of certain of the Company's OEM customers, and in turn, their orders from the Company. These and other competitive factors affecting the networking, telecommunications and computer system industries in general, and the Company's OEM customers in particular, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, volatility in the market for DRAM components, could have a material adverse effect on one of the Company's major customers, and consequently on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operation. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Results of Operations."

     The Company's operations may be affected by a number of factors including economic conditions, price competition, the level of volume and the timing of customer orders, product mix, management of manufacturing processes, materials procurement and inventory management, fixed asset utilization, foreign currency fluctuations, the level of experience in manufacturing a particular product, customer product delivery requirements, availability and pricing of components, availability of experienced labor and failure to introduce, or lack of market acceptance, new processes, services, technologies and products. In addition, the level of net sales and gross margin can vary significantly based on whether certain projects are contracted on a turnkey basis, where the Company purchases materials, versus on a consignment basis, where materials are provided by the customer (turnkey manufacturing tends to result in higher net sales and lower gross margins than consignment manufacturing). An adverse change in one or more of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     In addition, customer orders can be canceled and volume levels can be changed or delayed. From time to time, some of the Company's customers have terminated their manufacturing arrangements with the Company, and other customers have reduced or delayed the volume of design and manufacturing services performed by the Company. Resolving customer obligations due to program or relationship termination and the replacement of canceled, delayed or reduced contracts with new business cannot be assured. Termination of a manufacturing relationship or changes, reductions or delays in orders could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     Expansion has caused, and is expected to cause, strain on the Company's infrastructure, including its managerial, technical, financial, information systems and other resources. To manage further growth, the Company must continue to enhance financial and operational controls, develop or hire additional executive officers and other qualified personnel. Continued growth will also require increased investments to add manufacturing capacity and to enhance management information systems. See "Certain Factors=ERP System Implementation." There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to scale its internal infrastructure and other resources to effectively manage growth and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     The markets served by the Company are characterized by short product life cycles and rapid technology changes. The Company's ability to successfully support new product introductions is critical to the Company's customers. New product introductions have caused, and are expected to continue to cause, certain inefficiencies and strain on the Company's resources. Any such inefficiencies could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.      

     New operations, whether foreign or domestic, can require significant start-up costs and capital expenditures. In the event that the Company continues to expand its domestic or international operations, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating revenue to recover start-up and operating costs. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Results of Operations."

     During the second quarter of fiscal 2000, Richard Downing resigned from his position as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The Company has eliminated this position, thereby taking the opportunity to reduce overall costs and management layers within the organization.

     The Company's continued success depends to a large extent upon the efforts and abilities of key managerial and technical employees. The Company's business will also depend upon its ability to continue to attract and retain qualified employees. Although the Company has been successful in attracting and retaining key managerial and technical employees to date, the loss of services of certain key employees, in particular any of its executive officers, or the Company's failure to continue to attract and retain other key managerial and technical employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     The electronics manufacturing services industry is intensely competitive and subject to rapid change, and includes numerous regional, national and international companies, a number of which have achieved substantial market share. The Company believes that the primary competitive factors in its targeted markets are manufacturing technology, product quality, responsiveness and flexibility, consistency of performance, range of services provided, the location of facilities and price. To be competitive, the Company must provide technologically advanced manufacturing services, high quality products, flexible production schedules and reliable delivery of finished products on a timely and price competitive basis. Failure to satisfy any of the foregoing requirements could materially and adversely affect the Company's competitive position. The Company competes directly with a number of EMS firms, including Celestica International Holdings Inc., Flextronics International, Ltd., Jabil Circuits, Inc., Sanmina Corporation and Solectron Corporation. The Company also faces indirect competition from the captive manufacturing operations of its current and prospective customers, which continually evaluate the merits of manufacturing products internally rather than using the services of EMS providers. Many of the Company's competitors have more geographically diversified manufacturing facilities, international procurement capabilities, research and development and capital and marketing resources than the Company. In addition, the Company may be at a competitive disadvantage because some of the Company's competitors are less financially leveraged, resulting in, among other things, greater operational and financial flexibility for such competitors. See "Certain Factors--High Level of Indebtedness; Ability to Service Indebtedness and Satisfy Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements." In recent years, the EMS industry has attracted new entrants and many existing participants have substantially expanded their manufacturing capacity by expanding their facilities through both internal expansion and acquisitions. In the event of a decrease in overall demand for EMS services, this increased capacity could result in substantial pricing pressures, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     The Company currently offers EMS capabilities in North America, Asia and Europe. The Company began offering EMS capabilities in Mexico late in the second quarter of fiscal 2000 and began shipments of product early in the third quarter of fiscal 2000. Management believes that the percentage of the Company's revenue derived from international sales will increase in the future as OEMs look for low-cost solutions for their more mature and price sensitive products and seek manufacturing near the markets where their products will be sold and distributed. In the second quarter of fiscal 2000, net sales attributable to foreign operations totaled $18.8 million or 19% of total net sales. The Company may be affected by economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which it operates and certain other risks of doing business abroad, including fluctuations in the value of currencies, import duties, changes to import and export regulations (including quotas), possible restrictions on the transfer of funds, employee turnover, labor or civil unrest, long payment cycles, greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable, the burdens, cost and risk of compliance with a variety of foreign laws, and, in certain parts of the world, political and economic instability. In addition, the attractiveness of the Company's services to its United States customers is affected by United States trade policies, such as "most favored nation" status and trade preferences, which are reviewed periodically by the United States government. Changes in policies by the United States or foreign governments could result in, for example, increased duties, higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, hostility toward United States-owned operations, limitations on imports or exports, or the expropriation of private enterprises, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition or results of operations. The Company's Belgian and Mexican operations are subject to labor union agreements covering managerial, supervisory and production employees, which set standards for, among other things, the maximum number of working hours and minimum compensation levels. In addition, economic considerations in Belgium may make it difficult for the Company's Belgian facility to compete effectively compared to other lower cost European locations. The Company's Malaysian operations and assets are subject to significant political, economic, legal and other uncertainties customary for businesses located in Malaysia.

     The Company's international operations are based in Belgium, Malaysia and Mexico. The functional currency of the Company's Belgium, Malaysia and Mexico operations are the Belgium franc, Malaysian ringgit and U.S. dollar, respectively. Fixed assets for the Belgium and Malaysia operations are denominated in each entity's functional currency and translation gains or losses will occur as the exchange rate between the local functional currency and the U.S. dollar fluctuates on each balance sheet reporting date. The Company's financial performance may be adversely impacted by changes in exchange rates between these currencies and the U.S. dollar. The Company's equity investment in Malaysia is long-term in nature and, therefore, any translation adjustments are shown as a separate component of shareholders' equity and do not effect the Company's net income (loss). Prior to fiscal 2000, the Company's investment in Belgium was considered short-term in nature. In the first quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company deemed a portion of its Belgian investment as long-term. The Company's cumulative translation losses as of March 2, 2000, were $2.3 million and $0.2 million for the Belgium and Malaysia operations, respectively. An additional risk is that certain working capital accounts such as accounts receivable and accounts payable are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency and may give rise to exchange gains or losses upon settlement or at the end of any financial reporting period. Sales in currencies other than the functional currency were approximately 0.1%, 19.0% and 0% of consolidated sales for the quarter ended March 2, 2000 for Belgium, Malaysia and Mexico, respectively. Sales in currencies other than the functional currency were approximately 0.1%, 16.7% and 0% of consolidated sales for the six months ended March 2, 2000 for Belgium, Malaysia and Mexico, respectively. Certain direct labor, manufacturing overhead, and selling, general and administrative costs of the international operations are denominated in the local currencies. Transaction gains and losses are reflected in the Company's net income. The Company's transaction losses for the quarter ended March 2, 2000 were $0.1 and $0.0 million for the Belgium and Mexico operations, respectively. The Company's transaction losses for the six months ended March 2, 2000 were $0.2 and $0.0 million for the Belgium and Mexico operations, respectively. There were no transaction gains or losses for the Malaysia operations during these same periods. In September 1998, the Malaysian government imposed currency control measures which, among other things, fixed the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Malaysian ringgit and made it more difficult to repatriate the Company's investments. The Company attempts to minimize the impact of exchange rate volatility by entering into U.S. dollar denominated transactions whenever possible for purchases of raw materials and capital equipment and by keeping minimal cash balances of foreign currencies. As exchange rates fluctuate, the Company will continue to experience translation and transaction adjustments related to its investments in Belgium, Malaysia and Mexico, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

     The Company is subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, waste water discharge, waste storage, treatment and disposal, and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. While the Company believes that it is currently in material compliance with all such environmental requirements, any failure to comply with present and future requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial conditions and results of operations. Such requirements could require the Company to acquire costly equipment or to incur other significant expenses to comply with environmental regulations. The imposition of additional or more stringent environmental requirements, the results of future testing at the Company's facilities, or a determination that the Company is potentially responsible for remediation at other sites where problems are not presently known, could result in expenditures in excess of amounts currently estimated to be required for such matters.

     Cornerstone Equity Investors and certain other investors beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 90.0% of the outstanding capital stock (other than the Redeemable Preferred Stock) of the Company. As a result, although no single investor has more than 49.0% of the voting power of the Company's outstanding securities or the ability to appoint a majority of the directors, the aggregate votes of these investors could determine the composition of a majority of the board of directors and, therefore, influence the management and policies of the Company.

     The Company uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, except for its operations in Belgium and Malaysia. Direct labor, manufacturing overhead, and selling, general and administrative costs of the international operations are denominated in the local currencies. The Company has evaluated the potential costs and benefits of hedging potential adverse changes in the exchange rates between U.S. dollar, Belgian Franc and Malaysian Ringgit. Currently, the Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments because a substantial portion of the Company's sales in these foreign operations are in U.S dollars. The assets and liabilities of the Belgium and Malaysia operations are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the period end date. Income and expense items are translated at the year-to-date average rate. Aggregate transaction losses included in net loss for the second quarter and six months ended March 2, 2000 were $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively.

(a): The following are filed as part of this report:

     During the second quarter of Fiscal 2000, no reports on Form 8-K were filed.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on behalf of the registrant by the following duly authorized person.