<PAGE> 1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 27, 1999.
OR
[ ] Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to _______________
Commission file number 1-8703
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 95-2647125
- ----------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
8105 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, California 92618
- ---------------------------------------- -------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER INCLUDING AREA CODE: (949) 932-5000
REGISTRANT'S WEB SITE: HTTP://WWW.WESTERNDIGITAL.COM
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former name, former address and former fiscal year if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Number of shares outstanding of Common Stock, as of April 24, 1999, is
90,590,994.
<PAGE> 2
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE NO.
--------
<S> <C> <C>
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Three-Month Periods
Ended March 28, 1998 and March 27, 1999........................... 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations - Nine-Month Periods
Ended March 28, 1998 and March 27, 1999........................... 4
Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 27, 1998 and
March 27, 1999.................................................... 5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Nine-Month Periods
Ended March 28, 1998 and March 27, 1999........................... 6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................ 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations............................... 11
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk........ 23
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings................................................. 24
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.................................. 25
Signatures................................................................. 26
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE> 3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
-------------------------
MAR. 28, MAR. 27,
1998 1999
--------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues, net ............................................. $ 831,294 $ 668,456
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues .................................... 795,015 628,592
Research and development (Note 8) ................... 46,949 62,699
Selling, general and administrative ................. 47,551 46,210
Restructuring provision (Note 7) .................... -- 41,000
--------- ---------
Total costs and expenses ....................... 889,515 778,501
--------- ---------
Operating loss ............................................ (58,221) (110,045)
Net interest expense (Note 3) ............................. (536) (4,248)
--------- ---------
Loss before income taxes .................................. (58,757) (114,293)
Benefit from income taxes ................................. (13,735) --
--------- ---------
Net loss .................................................. $ (45,022) $(114,293)
========= =========
Loss per common share (Note 2):
Basic .......................................... $ (.51) $ (1.27)
========= =========
Diluted ........................................ $ (.51) $ (1.27)
========= =========
Common shares used in computing per share amounts (Note 2):
Basic .......................................... 87,812 89,883
========= =========
Diluted ........................................ 87,812 89,883
========= =========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated financial statements.
3
<PAGE> 4
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
----------------------------
MAR. 28, MAR. 27,
1998 1999
----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues, net ............................................. $ 2,891,022 $ 2,057,904
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues .................................... 2,749,232 2,081,625
Research and development (Note 8) ................... 133,723 164,983
Selling, general and administrative ................. 141,423 151,361
Restructuring provision (Note 7) .................... -- 41,000
----------- -----------
Total costs and expenses ....................... 3,024,378 2,438,969
----------- -----------
Operating loss ............................................ (133,356) (381,065)
Net interest income (expense) (Note 3) .................... 4,067 (10,139)
----------- -----------
Loss before income taxes .................................. (129,289) (391,204)
Benefit from income taxes ................................. (1,791) --
----------- -----------
Net loss .................................................. $ (127,498) $ (391,204)
=========== ===========
Loss per common share (Note 2):
Basic .......................................... $ (1.46) $ (4.39)
=========== ===========
Diluted ........................................ $ (1.46) $ (4.39)
=========== ===========
Common shares used in computing per share amounts
(Note 2):
Basic .......................................... 87,291 89,105
=========== ===========
Diluted ........................................ 87,291 89,105
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated financial statements.
4
<PAGE> 5
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 27, MAR. 27,
1998 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents .............................. $ 459,830 $ 297,095
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $15,926 at June 27, 1998 and
$18,405 at March 27, 1999 ......................... 369,013 311,462
Inventories (Note 3) ................................... 186,516 163,413
Prepaid expenses ....................................... 36,763 34,659
----------- -----------
Total current assets .............................. 1,052,122 806,629
Property and equipment at cost, net .......................... 346,987 312,108
Intangible and other assets, net ............................. 43,579 39,685
----------- -----------
Total assets ...................................... $ 1,442,688 $ 1,158,422
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable ....................................... $ 330,130 $ 349,597
Accrued compensation ................................... 23,697 34,626
Accrued warranty ....................................... 47,135 83,930
Accrued expenses (Note 7) .............................. 187,617 185,730
----------- -----------
Total current liabilities ......................... 588,579 653,883
Long-term debt (Note 5) ...................................... 519,188 537,784
Deferred income taxes ........................................ 17,163 17,076
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 6)
Subsequent event (Note 10)
Shareholders' equity (deficiency) (Notes 2 and 4):
Preferred stock, $.01 par value;
Authorized: 5,000 shares
Outstanding: None ................................ -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value;
Authorized: 225,000 shares
Outstanding: 101,332 shares at June 27,
1998 and 101,908 at March 27, 1999 ................ 1,013 1,019
Additional paid-in capital ............................. 326,244 335,378
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) ................ 197,849 (193,355)
Treasury stock-common stock at cost;
13,039 shares at June 27, 1998 and 11,329
shares at March 27, 1999 .......................... (207,348) (193,363)
----------- -----------
Total shareholders' equity (deficiency) ........... 317,758 (50,321)
----------- -----------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
(deficiency) .................................. $ 1,442,688 $ 1,158,422
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated financial statements.
5
<PAGE> 6
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
------------------------
MAR. 28, MAR. 27,
1998 1999
--------- ----------
<S> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss ................................................ $(127,498) $(391,204)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Non-Cash Charges:
Depreciation and amortization ...................... 73,834 101,841
Interest accrued on convertible debentures ......... 3,020 18,596
Non-cash portion of restructuring provision (Note 7) -- 25,603
Non-cash portion of in-process R&D (Note 8) ........ -- 7,471
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable ................................ 70,250 57,551
Inventories ........................................ 7,269 23,103
Prepaid expenses ................................... (18,394) 2,158
Other assets ....................................... 1,335 2,409
Accounts payable ................................... 12,019 19,467
Accrued compensation, accrued warranty and
accrued expenses (Note 7) ........................ 23,108 45,837
Deferred income taxes .............................. 1,179 (87)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used for) operating
activities ................................... 46,122 (87,255)
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures, net ............................... (167,693) (87,763)
Decrease in other assets ................................ 4,825 --
--------- ---------
Net cash used for investing activities ......... (162,868) (87,763)
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit
in 1998 (Note 4) ...................................... 9,933 5,354
Proceeds from ESPP shares issued (Note 4) ............... 12,684 9,854
Costs relating to credit facility ....................... -- (2,925)
Common stock repurchase program ......................... (28,304) --
Proceeds from issuance of debentures .................... 460,129 --
Proceeds from issuance of bank debt ..................... 50,000 --
Debt issuance costs ..................................... (18,168) --
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities ...... 486,274 12,283
--------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .... 369,528 (162,735)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period .......... 208,276 459,830
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period ................ $ 577,804 $ 297,095
========= =========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for income taxes .................. $ 14,519 $ 4,080
Cash paid during the period for interest ...................... 996 3,554
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these consolidated financial statements.
6
<PAGE> 7
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 1 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended June 27, 1998.
2. The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted loss
per share under the provisions of SFAS No. 128 (in thousands, except for
per share amounts):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED
------------------------ -----------------------
MAR. 28, MAR. 27, MAR. 28, MAR. 27,
1998 1999 1998 1999
-------- --------- --------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Numerator:
Numerator for basic and diluted
loss per share--net loss ..... $(45,022) $(114,293) $(127,498) $(391,204)
======== ========= ========= =========
Denominator:
Denominator for basic loss per
share--weighted average number
of common shares outstanding
during the period ............ 87,812 89,883 87,291 89,105
Incremental common shares
attributable to exercise of
outstanding options, ESPP
contributions and convertible
debentures ................... -- -- -- --
-------- --------- --------- ---------
Denominator for diluted loss
per share .................... 87,812 89,883 87,291 89,105
======== ========= ========= =========
Basic loss per share ........... $ (.51) $ (1.27) $ (1.46) $ (4.39)
======== ========= ========= =========
Diluted loss per share ......... $ (.51) $ (1.27) $ (1.46) $ (4.39)
======== ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
For the three and nine-month periods ended March 28, 1998 and March 27,
1999, 12.5 and 16.6 million shares, respectively, relating to the possible
exercise of outstanding stock options were not included in the computation
of diluted loss per share. For the three and nine-month periods ended March
28, 1998 and March 27, 1999, an additional 19.4 million shares issuable
upon conversion of the convertible debentures were excluded from the
computation of diluted loss per share. The effects of these items were not
included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect would
have been anti-dilutive.
On September 10, 1998, the Company's board of directors authorized and
declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each share of common
stock of the Company outstanding at the close of business on November 30,
1998. In addition, the Company's board of directors authorized the issuance
of one Right for each share of common stock of the Company issued from the
Record Date until certain dates as specified in the Company's Rights
Agreement dated as of October 15, 1998, pursuant to which the Company's
existing shareholders rights plan will be replaced by a successor ten year
plan. The Rights issued become exercisable for common stock at a discount
from market value upon certain events related to a change in control.
7
<PAGE> 8
3. Supplemental Financial Statement Data (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
JUNE 27, MAR. 27,
1998 1999
-------- ---------
<S> <C> <C>
Inventories
Finished goods.......................... $126,363 $ 93,158
Work in process......................... 28,287 29,645
Raw materials and component parts....... 31,866 40,610
-------- --------
$186,516 $163,413
======== ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE-MONTH NINE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED PERIOD ENDED
------------------- ------------------
MAR. 28, MAR. 27, MAR. 28, MAR. 27,
1998 1999 1998 1999
------- ------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net Interest Income (Expense)
Interest income......................... $ 3,792 $ 4,187 $ 8,395 $ 14,303
Interest expense........................ (4,328) (8,435) (4,328) (24,442)
------- ------- ------- --------
Net interest income (expense)........... $ (536) $(4,248) $ 4,067 $(10,139)
======= ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
4. During the nine month period ended March 27, 1999, the Company issued
1,002,000 and 709,000 shares of its common stock in connection with the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") and common stock option exercises,
respectively, for $15.2 million.
5. In November 1998, the Company replaced its then existing secured revolving
credit and term loan facility with a new facility ("Senior Bank Facility").
The Senior Bank Facility provides the Company with a $150.0 million
revolving credit line and a $50.0 million term loan, both of which expire
in November 2001. The term loan requires quarterly payments of $2.5 million
beginning in September 1999 with the remaining balance due in November
2001. The Senior Bank Facility is secured by substantially all of the
Company's assets. The availability under the revolving portion of the
Senior Bank Facility is dependent on the borrowing base. At the option of
the Company, borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR or a base rate plus a
margin determined by the borrowing base, with option periods of one to
three months. The Senior Bank Facility requires the Company to maintain
certain amounts of net equity and prohibits the payment of dividends. The
$50.0 million term loan outstanding as of September 26, 1998 under the
previous credit facility was repaid and replaced with the $50.0 million
term loan under the Senior Bank Facility.
6. The Company was sued by Amstrad PLC ("Amstrad") in December 1992 in Orange
County Superior Court. The complaint alleges that hard drives supplied by
the Company in calendar 1988 and 1989 were defective and caused damages to
Amstrad of $186.0 million in out-of-pocket expenses, lost profits, injury
to Amstrad's reputation and loss of goodwill. The Company filed a
counterclaim for $3.0 million in actual damages in addition to exemplary
damages in an unspecified amount. Trial of this case commenced October 5,
1998, and on January 5, 1999, with the jury deadlocked on the issue of
liability, a mistrial was declared. Retrial of the case began on March 15,
1999, and is continuing. The Company believes that it has meritorious
defenses to Amstrad's claims and is vigorously defending itself against the
Amstrad claims and pressing its claims against Amstrad in this action.
Although the Company believes that the final disposition of this matter
will not have an adverse effect on the Company's financial condition or
operating results, if Amstrad were to prevail on its claims, a judgment for
a material amount could be awarded against the Company.
8
<PAGE> 9
On February 26, 1999, the Lemelson Foundation ("Lemelson") sued the Company
and 87 other companies in the U. S. District Court for the District of
Arizona. The complaint alleges infringement of numerous patents held by Mr.
Jerome H. Lemelson relating to, among other matters, "machine vision",
"computer image analysis", and "Automatic Identification". The Company has
not yet had an opportunity to evaluate the allegations contained in the
complaint. However, based upon the information presently known to
management, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of
this matter will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
or results of operation of the Company. However, because of the nature and
inherent uncertainties of litigation, should the outcome of this action be
unfavorable, the Company may be required to pay damages and other expenses,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
position and results of operations. In addition, the costs of defending
such litigation may be high, regardless of the outcome.
In 1994 Papst Licensing ("Papst") brought suit against the Company in U. S.
District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement
by the Company of five of its patents relating to disk drive motors that
the Company purchases from motor vendors. Later that year Papst dismissed
its case without prejudice, but it has notified the Company that it intends
to reinstate the suit if the Company does not agree to enter into a license
agreement with Papst. Papst has also put the Company on notice with respect
to several additional patents. The Company does not believe that the
ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on
the financial condition or results of operation of the Company. However,
because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of litigation, should the
outcome of this action be unfavorable, the Company may be required to pay
damages and other expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial position and results of operations. In addition,
the costs of defending such litigation may be high, regardless of the
outcome.
In the normal course of business, the Company receives and makes inquiry
with regard to possible intellectual property matters including alleged
patent infringement. Where deemed advisable, the Company may seek or extend
licenses or negotiate settlements. Several such matters are currently
pending. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operation of the Company.
7. On January 19, 1999, the Company initiated a restructuring program which
has resulted in the combination of its Personal Storage Division and
Enterprise Storage Group into a single hard drive operating unit. The new
Drive Products Division ("DPD") combines design, manufacturing, materials,
business and product marketing resources to address both the desktop and
enterprise markets. The Company expects the move to result in operating
efficiencies. In connection with combining the divisions, the Company's
Tuas, Singapore facility was closed and production of WD Enterprise drives
was moved to the Company's nearby manufacturing facility in Chai-Chee,
Singapore. The restructuring program resulted in a reduction of worldwide
employee headcount by approximately 900 employees, write-offs of facilities
and fixed assets of approximately $26.0 million, employee severance costs
of approximately $5.0 million, and other incremental costs incurred within
the third quarter. Of the total $41.0 million charge to the Company's
results of operations for the quarter ended March 27, 1999, $7.0 million
was paid in cash during the quarter, $8.0 million was accrued for expected
payment in the fourth quarter and the remaining $26.0 million represents
non-cash charges.
9
<PAGE> 10
8. On February 1, 1999, the Company acquired Crag Technologies, Inc. (renamed
Connex, Inc. after the acquisition), a San Jose-based startup company
formed to develop storage solutions for NT servers at a cost of
approximately $12.0 million. The purchase price included approximately
580,000 shares of unregistered Western Digital common stock valued at $7.9
million, forgiveness of amounts advanced to Connex prior to the acquisition
totaling $2.0 million and the assumption of certain liabilities and was
accounted for as a purchase. At the time of the acquisition, Connex was a
development stage operation with no commercial products yet available for
sale. Connex had, at the time of the acquisition, several in-process
research and development projects. The Company's primary purpose for the
acquisition was to acquire these in-process projects and complete the
development efforts as the Company believed they had economic value, but
had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future
uses. Therefore, the Company has allocated substantially all of the
purchase price as a one-time charge for in-process research and development
of $12.0 million to the Company's results of operations for the third
quarter. The Company plans to continue the development efforts and expects
to ship the first new products developed by Connex within the next 8 to 12
months.
9. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly state the
consolidated financial statements have been made. All such adjustments are
of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
as of and for the year ended June 27, 1998.
10. On April 8, 1999, the Company completed the sale of its Santa Clara disk
media operations to Komag, Inc. ("Komag"), for approximately 10.8 million
shares of unregistered Komag stock valued at $34.9 million, a three-year
note in the principal amount of $30.1 million, and cash consideration of
$1.6 million. In addition, Komag assumed certain liabilities, mainly leases
related to production equipment and facilities, some of which are
guaranteed by the Company. Terms of the agreement include a three-year
volume purchase agreement under which the Company will buy a substantial
portion of its media from Komag. The Komag shares issued to the Company can
be resold in specified increments over a 3 1/2 year period. The three-year
note to the Company includes a principal reduction provision based on the
performance of Komag's stock. As a result of the transaction, the Company
expects to record a charge of approximately $20.0 million in its fourth
quarter ending July 3, 1999, $3.0 million of which is expected to utilize
cash. In addition, worldwide headcount will be reduced by approximately
1,100 as a result of the sale.
10
<PAGE> 11
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, that involve risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can typically be identified by the use
of forward-looking words, such as "may," "will," "could," "project," "believe,"
"anticipate," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan," "forecast,"
and the like. These statements appear in a number of places in this Report and
include statements regarding the intentions, plans, strategies, beliefs or
current expectations of the Company, its directors or its officers, with respect
to, among other things:
o the financial prospects of the Company;
o the Company's financing plans;
o trends affecting the Company's financial condition or operating results;
o the Company's strategies for growth, operations, and product
development and commercialization; and
o conditions or trends in or factors affecting the computer or hard drive
industry.
Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, do not guarantee
future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated. The information contained
in "Risk Factors" of this Report, as well as in the Company's other periodic
reports on Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, identifies important factors that could cause such differences.
Unless otherwise indicated, references herein to specific years and quarters are
to the Company's fiscal years and fiscal quarters. The three-month period ended
March 27, 1999 is referred to herein as the third quarter of 1999 or the current
quarter.
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
On January 19, 1999, the Company initiated a restructuring program which has
resulted in the combination of its Personal Storage Division and Enterprise
Storage Group into a single hard drive operating unit. The new Drive Products
Division ("DPD") combines design, manufacturing, materials, business and product
marketing resources to address both the desktop and enterprise markets. The
Company expects the move to result in operating efficiencies. In connection with
combining the divisions, the Company's Tuas, Singapore facility was closed and
production of WD Enterprise drives was moved to the Company's nearby
manufacturing facility in Chai-Chee, Singapore. The restructuring program
resulted in a reduction of worldwide employee headcount by approximately 900
employees, write-offs of facilities and fixed assets of approximately $26.0
million, employee severance costs of approximately $5.0 million, and other
incremental costs incurred within the third quarter. Of the total $41.0 million
charge to the Company's results of operations for the quarter ended March 27,
1999, $7.0 million was paid in cash during the quarter, $8.0 million was accrued
for expected payment in the fourth quarter and the remaining $26.0 million
represents non-cash charges.
On February 1, 1999, the Company acquired Crag Technologies, Inc. (renamed
Connex, Inc. after the acquisition), a San Jose-based startup company formed to
develop storage solutions for NT servers at a cost of approximately $12.0
million. The purchase price included approximately 580,000 shares of
unregistered Western Digital common stock valued at $7.9 million, forgiveness of
amounts advanced to Connex prior to the acquisition totaling $2.0 million and
the assumption of certain liabilities and was accounted for as a purchase. At
the time of the acquisition, Connex was a development stage operation with no
commercial products yet available for sale. Connex had, at the time of the
acquisition, several in-process research and development projects. The Company's
primary purpose for the acquisition was to acquire these in-process projects and
complete the development efforts as the Company believed they had economic
value, but had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative
future uses. Therefore, the Company has allocated substantially all of the
purchase price as a one-time charge for in-process research and development of
$12.0 million to the Company's results of operations for the third quarter. The
Company plans to continue the development efforts and expects to ship the first
new products developed by Connex within the next 8 to 12 months.
11
<PAGE> 12
On April 8, 1999, the Company completed the sale of its Santa Clara disk media
operations to Komag, Inc. ("Komag"), for approximately 10.8 million shares of
unregistered Komag stock valued at $34.9 million, a three-year note in the
principal amount of $30.1 million, and cash consideration of $1.6 million. In
addition, Komag assumed certain liabilities, mainly leases related to production
equipment and facilities, some of which are guaranteed by the Company. Terms of
the agreement include a three-year volume purchase agreement under which the
Company will buy a substantial portion of its media from Komag. The Komag shares
issued to the Company can be resold in specified increments over a 3 1/2 year
period. The three-year note to the Company includes a principal reduction
provision based on the performance of Komag's stock. As a result of the
transaction, the Company expects to record a charge of approximately $20.0
million in its fourth quarter ending July 3, 1999, $3.0 million of which is
expected to utilize cash. In addition, worldwide headcount will be reduced by
approximately 1,100 as a result of the sale.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Consolidated revenues were $668.5 million in the third quarter of 1999, a
decrease of 20% from the third quarter of the prior year and an decrease of 10%
from the immediately preceding quarter. Consolidated revenues were $2.1 billion
in the first nine months of 1999, down 29% from the corresponding period of
1998. The lower revenues in the three and nine-month periods ended March 27,
1999 resulted from 2% and 13% declines in hard drive unit shipments from the
comparable periods of 1998, respectively, combined with reductions in the
average selling prices ("ASPs") of hard drive products due to an intensely
competitive hard drive business environment. The lower revenues in the current
quarter compared to the immediately preceding quarter were due to a 6% decrease
in hard drive unit shipments and lower ASPs.
Consolidated gross profit for the third quarter of 1999 totaled $39.9 million,
or 6% of revenue. This compares to $36.3 million and 4% for the corresponding
period of the prior year and $19.2 million and 3% for the immediately preceding
quarter. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily related to a shift in
product mix to higher capacity, higher margin products along with a decrease in
production cost from improved component pricing, better yields, and higher areal
density.
Consolidated gross profit (loss) and gross profit (loss) percentages for the
first nine months of 1999 and the corresponding period of the prior year were
($23.7) million, or (1%), and $141.8 million, or 5%, respectively. Gross profit
(loss) for the first nine months of 1999 and the corresponding period of the
prior year include charges of $77.0 million incurred in the first quarter of
fiscal year 1999 and $148.0 million incurred in the second quarter of fiscal
year 1998, respectively. Excluding the aforementioned charges, consolidated
gross margin percentages for the first nine months of 1999 and the corresponding
period of the prior year were 3% and 10%, respectively. The decline in gross
margin percentages was primarily related to lower ASPs for the Company's
products, partially offset by a reduction in desktop unit costs.
Research and development ("R&D") expense for the current quarter was $62.7
million, an increase of $15.8 million from the third quarter of the prior year
and an increase of $12.3 million from the immediately preceding quarter. R&D
expense for the first nine months of 1999 was $165.0 million, an increase of
$31.3 million from the same period of 1998. The increase is primarily due to the
$12.0 million write off of in-process research and development related to the
acquisition of Crag Technologies, Inc. in the current quarter and higher
spending due to the Company's decision to develop a full line of enterprise
storage products and focused effort to regain time-to-market leadership with its
desktop storage products.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses for the third quarter of
1999 were $46.2 million, a decrease of $1.3 million from the corresponding
quarter of the prior year and a decrease of $1.6 million from the immediately
preceding quarter. The sequential decrease was due to lower selling and
marketing expense as a result of the lower revenue base. SG&A expenses were
$151.4 million for the first nine months of 1999, up $9.9 million from the same
period of 1998. The increase was primarily the result of the $7.5 million of
foreign currency-related special charges recorded in the first quarter of 1999
for losses on terminated hedging contracts on the Malaysian Ringgit currency due
to the Malaysian government's imposition of currency controls, and higher
depreciation expense associated with the Company's recently implemented computer
information systems.
12
<PAGE> 13
Net interest expense for the current quarter of fiscal 1999 was $4.2 million,
compared with net interest expense of $0.5 million in the corresponding quarter
of 1998 and net interest expense of $3.2 million in the immediately preceding
quarter. Net interest expense was $10.1 million for the first nine months of
1999 as compared to net interest income of $4.1 million in the corresponding
period of 1998. The changes from the comparable periods of 1998 were primarily
attributable to interest expense incurred on the Company's $50.0 million term
loan, which is part of the Company's Senior Bank Facility, and accrual of
original issue discount on the Company's convertible subordinated debentures due
2018 ("Debentures"). No debt was outstanding during the first seven months of
1998. Partially offsetting this increase was incremental interest income earned
on higher average cash and cash equivalents balances during the current
nine-month period due to the proceeds from the sale of the Debentures and
borrowings under the Senior Bank Facility. The increase in net interest expense
from the immediately preceding quarter was primarily the result of lower average
cash and cash equivalent balances on hand during the current quarter.
The income tax benefit recorded in the nine-month period ended March 28, 1998
represents the expected benefit of loss carrybacks, partially offset by
provisions for income taxes recorded in certain jurisdictions that had positive
earnings. The Company did not record an income tax benefit for the losses
incurred in the first nine months of fiscal 1999 as it is not more likely than
not that the resulting deferred tax assets will be realized.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 27, 1999, the Company had $297.1 million of cash and cash equivalents
as compared with $459.8 million at June 27, 1998. Net cash used for operating
activities was $87.3 million during the first nine months of 1999 as compared to
net cash provided by operating activities of $46.1 million in the corresponding
period of the prior year. Cash flows resulting from lower inventories, lower
accounts receivable and higher current liabilities were more than offset by the
net loss (net of non-cash charges). Another significant use of cash during the
first nine months of 1999 was net capital expenditures of $87.8 million,
incurred primarily to upgrade the Company's media production capability and for
normal replacement of existing assets.
In November 1998, the Company replaced its then existing secured revolving
credit and term loan facility with a new facility ("Senior Bank Facility"). The
Senior Bank Facility provides the Company with a $150.0 million revolving credit
line and a $50.0 million term loan, both of which expire in November 2001. The
term loan requires quarterly payments of $2.5 million beginning in September
1999 with the remaining balance due in November 2001. The Senior Bank Facility
is secured by substantially all of the Company's assets. The availability under
the revolving portion of the Senior Bank Facility is dependent on the borrowing
base. At the option of the Company, borrowings bear interest at either LIBOR or
a base rate plus a margin determined by the borrowing base, with option periods
of one to three months. The Senior Bank Facility requires the Company to
maintain certain amounts of net equity and prohibits the payment of dividends.
The Company owns approximately 34 acres of land in Irvine, California, upon
which it had planned to build a new corporate headquarters. These plans have
been indefinitely deferred until such time as industry conditions improve. The
current headquarters lease expires June 2000. The Company is currently
considering other alternatives, including renewal of its existing lease.
However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in
renewing its existing lease on terms that will be satisfactory to the Company,
and other alternatives available to the Company upon expiration of its current
headquarters lease in June 2000 could be more costly.
The Company believes that its current cash balances combined with cash flows
from operations and the Senior Bank Facility will be sufficient to meet its
working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, the Company's ability
to sustain its working capital position is dependent upon a number of factors
that are discussed below under the heading "Risk Factors".
13
<PAGE> 14
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 130 and 131, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income" ("SFAS 130") and "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information" ("SFAS 131"), respectively (collectively, the
"Statements"). The Statements are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 1997. SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting of comprehensive
income and its components in annual and interim financial statements. SFAS 131
establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about
an enterprise's operating segments in its annual financial statements and
selected segment information in interim financial reports. Reclassification or
restatement of comparative financial statements or financial information for
earlier periods is required upon adoption of SFAS 130 and SFAS 131. For the
three and nine-month periods ended March 27, 1999 and all prior periods
presented, the Company has not possessed any of the components of other
comprehensive income as defined in SFAS 130. Western Digital operates in one
industry segment, the hard drive industry. Accordingly, the Company does not
expect to have any significant new disclosures about the Company's operating
segments in it's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending July 3,
1999. Application of these Statements' requirements is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or loss per share as currently reported.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 is effective for all fiscal
quarters or fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. SFAS 133 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts and for hedging activities. Application of this Statement's
requirements is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
YEAR 2000
The Company has considered the impact of Year 2000 issues on its products,
computer systems and applications and has developed a remediation process.
Remediation activities are underway, and the Company expects readiness and
testing to be completed by June 1999 and full integration testing completed by
July, 1999. Expenditures related to the Year 2000 project, which excludes normal
replacement of existing capital assets, were approximately $5.0 million in 1998,
$4.8 million in the first nine months of 1999 and are expected to amount to
approximately $20.0 million in total. For an additional discussion of Year 2000
issues, see "Risk Factors."
RISK FACTORS
I. RISK FACTORS RELATED TO THE HARD DRIVE INDUSTRY IN WHICH WE OPERATE.
Because of rapid technological change in our industry, we cannot succeed
unless we make efficient and continual transitions to new products.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hard drive industry is characterized by rapid technological
transitions. These transitions center primarily on recording heads, which are
the minute electromagnetic elements that write and read back magnetic patterns
on the recording media. If we attempt to make these transitions too early or too
late, it can harm our operating results or competitive position within the
industry.
14
<PAGE> 15
For example, magneto-resistive head technology became the leading recording
head technology during early 1998. This technology enables higher capacity per
hard drive and better drive performance than conventional thin film heads, the
previous head technology standard. Magneto-resistive heads use separate read and
write elements, as opposed to conventional thin-film heads, which use the same
element to read and write magnetic patterns on the surface of the disk. Several
of our major competitors incorporated magneto-resistive head technology into
their products much earlier than we did and achieved time-to-market leadership
with some magneto-resistive products. We completed our transition of desktop
hard drives to magneto-resistive head technology by the end of 1998, and we have
already begun our transition to giant magneto-resistive heads, an advanced form
of magneto-resistive head technology that is the next recording head technology
standard. With these transitions we have improved our time-to-market
performance. However, if we fail to:
- consistently maintain and improve time-to-market performance as we
transition to products incorporating giant magneto-resistive head
technology
- achieve acceptable manufacturing yields and costs
- qualify these products with key customers on a timely basis
- produce these products in sufficient volume within our rapid product
cycle
then our market share would be adversely impacted, which would harm our
operating results.
Advances in magnetic, optical or other data storage technologies could
result in competitive products that have better performance or lower cost per
unit of capacity than our products. Some of our competitors are developing
hybrid storage devices which combine magnetic and optical technologies, but we
have decided not to pursue this technology at this time. If these products prove
to be superior in performance or cost per unit of capacity, we could be at a
competitive disadvantage to the companies offering those products.
Short product life cycles force us to continually qualify new products with
our customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to short product life cycles, we must regularly engage in new product
qualification with our customers. This process is typically complicated and
lengthy, and any failure or delay in qualifying new products with a customer can
result in our losing sales to that customer until the next generation of
products is introduced. Most of our customers qualify only a few vendors for
each product. This issue is particularly acute in the enterprise portion of the
market because the product life cycles for enterprise hard drives are longer
than those for desktop drives.
We will not be successful in the enterprise portion of the hard drive
market unless our enterprise hard drive volume grows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
If we are to succeed in the enterprise hard drive portion of the market, we
must increase our volume and market share. To do so, we must develop and timely
introduce new products, and we must increase the number of customers for our
products. A risk we face in expanding our product line is that there is
currently a world-wide shortage of qualified hard drive engineers. As a result,
competition for skilled hard drive development engineers is intense. We also may
encounter development delays or quality issues, which may retard or make the
introduction of new products more expensive. If we experience any of these
setbacks, we may miss crucial delivery time windows on these new enterprise
products, which would likely harm our operating results.
The hard drive industry is highly competitive and characterized by rapid
shifts in market share among the major competitors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The price of hard drives has fallen over time due to increases in supply,
cost reductions, technological advances and price reductions by competitors
seeking to liquidate excess inventories or gain market share. In addition, rapid
technological changes often reduce the volume and profitability of sales of
existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence. These
factors, taken together, result in significant and rapid shifts in market share
among the industry's major participants.
15
<PAGE> 16
For example, during 1996 and 1997, we significantly increased our share of
the desktop market, but most of these gains were lost during 1998 for the
following reasons:
- our decision to reduce production in the face of industry oversupply
and rapidly declining prices.
- our late transition to magneto-resistive head technology.
- manufacturing and performance issues encountered as we continued to
produce thin film head products at higher storage capacities than
our competitors.
The enterprise portion of the hard drive industry is more concentrated than
the desktop portion of the industry, and used to be less price-competitive than
the desktop portion of the industry. Performance, quality, and reliability are
even more important to the users of high-end products than to users in the
desktop market, which also made the enterprise portion of the industry less
price-competitive. However, this market has recently become much more price
competitive, which could lead to significant and rapid shifts in market share
among the industry's major participants.
We expect this trend to continue.
Changes in the desktop PC market could reduce demand for our products.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand for our hard drives depends on the demand for computer systems
manufactured by our customers and on storage upgrades to existing systems. The
demand for computer systems has been volatile in the past and often has had an
exaggerated effect on the demand for hard drives in any given period. In
calendar 1998, for example, the growth in desktop PC sales slowed significantly,
causing a sharp decline in demand for hard drives. We expect that this situation
will occur again in the future.
Over the past two years the consumer market for desktop computers has
shifted significantly towards lower priced systems, especially those systems
priced below $1,000. If the market for those lower price systems continues to
grow and we do not develop lower cost hard drives that can successfully compete
in this market, our market share could fall.
Furthermore, the PC market is fragmenting into a variety of computing
devices and products. Some of these products, such as internet appliances, may
not contain a hard drive. On the other hand, many industry analysts expect, as
do we, that as broadcasting and communications are increasingly converted to
digital technology from the older, analog technology, the technology of
computers and consumer electronics and communication devices will converge, and
hard drives will be found in many consumer products other than computers.
However, it is too early to assess the impact of these new developments on
future demand for hard drive products.
Changes in customer assembly practices render inventory management
difficult and can result in greater product returns.
------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of our customers require us to maintain a base stock of product in
locations adjacent to their manufacturing facilities. This increases our costs
and our risk from possible inventory obsolescence. In addition, some of our
customers are considering or have already implemented a so-called channel
assembly model, in which the customer ships a minimal computer system to a
dealer or other assembler. We then ship parts directly to the assembler for
installation at its location. This exposes us to risk of inventory mismanagement
by both the customer and the assembler. The channel assembly model requires
proper alignment between the customer, the assembler and us and requires us to
retain more of our product in inventory, increasing our risk of inventory
obsolescence. Furthermore, if the assemblers are not properly trained in
manufacturing processes, it could increase the number of product returns
resulting from damage during assembly or improper installation.
16
<PAGE> 17
II. RISK FACTORS RELATING TO WESTERN DIGITAL PARTICULARLY.
Concentration of product demand among a small number of customers could
harm our operating results.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
High volume customers for our hard drives are concentrated among a small
number of computer manufacturers, distributors and retailers. Although we
believe our relationships with key customers are generally good, if we were to
lose one or more accounts, it could harm our operating results. Our customers
are generally not required to purchase any minimum volume and are generally able
to end their relationship with us at will. Future changes in purchase volume or
customer relationships resulting in decreased demand for our hard drives,
whether by loss of or delays in orders, could harm our operating results.
Dependence on a limited number of qualified suppliers of components could
lead to delays or increased costs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
A number of the components used by us are available from a single or
limited number of qualified outside suppliers. If a component is in short supply
or a supplier fails to qualify a component, we may experience delays or
increased costs in obtaining that component. To reduce this risk, we attempt to
provide significant lead times when buying these components. As a result, we may
have to pay significant cancellation charges to suppliers if we cancel orders,
either because of market oversupply or transition to new products or
technologies. This occurred in 1998 when we accelerated our transition to
magneto-resistive recording head technology.
In April 1999, we entered into a three year volume purchase agreement with
Komag, Inc. under which we will buy a substantial portion of our media from
Komag. We intend that this strategic relationship will reduce our media
component costs; however, it increases our dependence on Komag as a supplier.
Our future operating results will depend substantially on Komag's ability to
timely qualify its media in our new development programs and to supply us with
media in sufficient volume to meet our production requirements. Any disruption
in Komag's ability to manufacture and supply us with media could harm our
operating results.
Manufacture of fewer components than our competitors increases our
vulnerability to shifting market conditions.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Because we manufacture fewer components than our competitors, an extended
shortage of required components or the failure of key suppliers to remain in
business, adjust to market conditions, or to meet our quality, yield or
production requirements could harm us more severely than our competitors.
Manufacturing our products abroad subjects us to numerous risks.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Our products are currently manufactured in Singapore and Malaysia. As a
result, we are subject to risks associated with foreign manufacturing,
including, among other risks:
- obtaining requisite United States and foreign governmental permits
and approvals
- currency exchange rate fluctuations or restrictions
- political instability and civil unrest
- transportation delays or higher freight rates
- labor problems
- trade restrictions or higher tariffs
- exchange, currency and tax controls and reallocations
- loss or non-renewal of favorable tax treatment under agreements or
treaties with foreign tax authorities.
17
<PAGE> 18
We attempt to manage the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes
by, among other things, entering into short-term, forward exchange contracts.
However, those contracts do not cover our full exposure and can be canceled by
the issuer if currency controls are put in place, as occurred in Malaysia during
the first quarter of 1999.
Component supply and technology license agreement with IBM requires us to
adapt IBM's product designs and integrate IBM technology.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
In June 1998, we entered into a broad-based hard drive component supply and
technology licensing agreement with IBM. Under this agreement, IBM is our sole
supplier of the head components for desktop hard drives that we manufacture with
IBM technology. Our business and operating results would be harmed if those
heads fail to satisfy our quality requirements or if IBM is unable to meet our
volume or delivery requirements. While we believe that IBM's current and planned
manufacturing capacity will meet our projected requirements, growth of our sales
of hard drives with IBM technology is dependent upon IBM continuing to devote
substantial financial resources to support the manufacture of the components.
The IBM agreement enables us to incorporate IBM's technology, designs and
hard drive components into our desktop products. Implementation of the agreement
presents several significant challenges:
- we must adapt IBM's product designs and manufacturing processes so
that the hard drives with IBM technology can be manufactured by us
at a low enough cost to compete in the high-volume desktop market
- our engineers must integrate IBM technology into our products while
continuing to conduct our own research and development activities
We entered into the agreement expecting that IBM will continue to lead the
hard drive industry in storage capacity and performance. We also believed that
we could leverage that leadership to give us a competitive advantage in the
desktop portion of the market through being faster to market with new products
and faster in reaching levels of volume at which our costs would decrease. If
IBM does not maintain that leadership, we may not realize the benefits we had
anticipated.
Although the agreement contains restrictions on IBM's ability to license
its technology to other companies, it is not exclusive, and competitors may have
access to both the products and the underlying technology. The agreement
continues until 2001, subject to several conditions including our commitment to
purchase specified quantities of components from IBM.
Our plan to broaden our product offerings in storage solutions takes us
into a new business and exposes us to additional risks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are preparing to enter the storage subsystem business through our
subsidiary, Connex, Inc. This area of storage solutions is a new business
venture for us. We will be facing the challenges of building market share in a
market which is new to us, but which has several established competitors. Our
success in this storage subsystems market will depend on Connex's ability to
successfully develop, introduce and achieve market acceptance of new products,
applications and product enhancements as the storage solutions business evolves.
Additionally, our competitors in this market have established intellectual
property portfolios. Our success will depend on our ability to license existing
intellectual property or create new innovations. Moreover, our competitors'
established intellectual property portfolios increase our risk of intellectual
property litigation.
18
<PAGE> 19
Our reliance on intellectual property and other proprietary information
subjects us to the risk of significant litigation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The hard drive industry has been characterized by significant litigation.
This includes litigation relating to patent and other intellectual property
rights, product liability claims and other types of litigation. We are currently
evaluating several notices of alleged patent infringement or notices of patents
from patent holders. We also are a party to several judicial and other
proceedings relating to patent and other intellectual property rights. If we
conclude that a claim of infringement is valid, we may be required to obtain a
license or cross-license or modify our existing technology or design a new
non-infringing technology. We may also be liable for any past infringement. If
there is an adverse ruling against us in an infringement lawsuit, an injunction
could be issued barring production or sale of any infringing product. It could
also result in a damage award equal to a reasonable royalty or lost profits or,
if there is a finding of willful infringement, treble damages. Any of these
results could increase our costs and harm our operating results.
Our reliance on intellectual property and other proprietary information
subjects us to the risk that these key ingredients of our business could be
reproduced or copied by competitors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our success depends, in significant part, on the proprietary nature of our
technology, including, among other things, our non-patentable intellectual
property such as our process technology. Despite safeguards, to the extent that
a competitor is able to reproduce or otherwise capitalize on our technology, it
may be difficult, expensive or impossible for us to obtain necessary legal
protection. Also, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our
intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In
addition to patent protection of intellectual property rights, we consider
elements of our product designs and processes to be proprietary and
confidential. We rely upon employee, consultant and vendor non-disclosure
agreements and a system of internal safeguards to protect our proprietary
information. However, we cannot insure that our registered and unregistered
intellectual property rights will not be challenged or exploited by others in
the industry.
Inaccurate projections of demand for our product can cause large
fluctuations in our quarterly results.
----------------------------------------------------------------
If we do not forecast total quarterly demand accurately, it can have a
material adverse effect on our quarterly results. We typically book and ship a
high percentage of our total quarterly sales in the third month of the quarter,
which makes it is difficult for us to match our production plans to customer
demands. In addition, our quarterly projections and results may in the future be
subject to significant fluctuations as a result of a number of other factors
including:
- the timing of orders from and shipment of products to major
customers
- our product mix
19
<PAGE> 20
- changes in the prices of our products
- manufacturing delays or interruptions
- acceptance by customers of competing products in lieu of our
products
- variations in the cost of components for our products
- limited access to components that we obtain from a single or a
limited number of suppliers, such as IBM or Komag
- competition and consolidation in the data storage industry
- seasonal and other fluctuations in demand for computers often
due to technological advances
- general economic conditions.
Rapidly changing market conditions in the hard drive industry make it
difficult to estimate actual results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have made and continue to make a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to our consolidated financial reporting. The rapidly changing market
conditions with which we deal means that actual results may differ significantly
from our estimates and assumptions. Key estimates and assumptions for us
include, among other things:
- accruals for warranty against product defects
- price adjustment reserves on products sold to resellers and
distributors
- reserves for excess, obsolete and slow moving inventories
- reserves for accounts receivable
- estimates of product returns.
Price volatility of our common stock.
--------------------------------------
The market price of our common stock has been, and may continue to be,
extremely volatile. Factors such as the following may significantly affect the
market price of our common stock:
- actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results
- announcements of technological innovations by us or our competitors
which may decrease the volume and profitability of sales of our
existing products and increase the risk of inventory obsolescence
- new products introduced by us or our competitors
- periods of severe pricing pressures due to oversupply or price erosion
resulting from competitive pressures
- developments with respect to patents or proprietary rights
- conditions and trends in the hard drive industry
- changes in financial estimates by securities analysts relating
specifically to us or the hard drive industry in general.
20
<PAGE> 21
In addition, the stock market in recent months has experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the stock price of
many high technology companies. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the
operating performance of the companies.
Securities class action lawsuits are often brought against companies after
periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. A number of such
suits have been filed against us in the past, and any of these litigation
matters could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources and
management's attention.
We may be unable to raise future capital through debt or equity financing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due to the risks described in this Report, in the future we may be unable
to maintain adequate financial resources for capital expenditures, working
capital and research and development. If we decide to increase or accelerate our
capital expenditures or research and development efforts, or if results of
operations do not meet our expectations, we could require additional debt or
equity financing. However, we cannot insure that additional financing will be
available to us or available on favorable terms. An equity financing could also
be dilutive to our existing stockholders.
Our failure to be Year 2000 compliant or such a failure by our key
suppliers or customers could delay manufacture or delivery of our products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe our hard drive products are Year 2000 compliant, although some
older, non-hard drive products previously sold by us may not be Year 2000
compliant. We anticipate that our systems, equipment and processes will be
substantially Year 2000 compliant by the end of July 1999. However, if we don't
complete our remediation efforts on time, or if we fail to identify all Year
2000 dependencies in our systems, equipment or processes or those of our
suppliers, customers or other organizations on which we rely, it could harm our
business, resulting in delays in the manufacture or delivery of our products. As
a result, we are developing contingency plans in the event such problems arise.
We expect to complete the development of our contingency plans by the end of
September 1999.
The Year 2000 issue is the result of computer programs, microprocessors,
and embedded date reliant systems using two digits rather than four to define
the applicable year. We consider a product to be Year 2000 compliant if the
product's performance and functionality are unaffected by processing of dates
prior to, during and after the Year 2000. In addition, we only consider a
product to be Year 2000 compliant if all elements used with the product properly
exchange accurate date data with it. Those elements include, among other things,
hardware, software and permanent instructions and data programmed directly into
the circuitry of the product. Litigation may be brought against makers of all
component products of systems that are not Year 2000 compliant. Our agreements
with customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our liability for
such claims. These provisions may not provide protection from liability,
however, because of existing or future federal, state or local laws or
ordinances or unfavorable judicial decisions. Any such claims, with or without
merit, could materially harm our business.
We have established a comprehensive program with a dedicated program
management office to deal with Year 2000 issues. We are addressing our most
critical internal systems first. We have categorized as "mission critical" or
"priority" systems, the failure of which would have a high likelihood of causing
an extended shutdown of all or a critical portion of a factory, personal injury
or have a significant and lengthy detrimental financial impact. As appropriate,
we are also testing customer and supplier electronic data interfaces with our
internal systems. We are prioritizing functions and systems on a worldwide
basis, and all of our facilities are coordinated in working toward our
company-wide timeline.
21
<PAGE> 22
We have committed people and resources to resolve potential Year 2000
issues, both internally and with respect to our suppliers and customers, for
both information technology assets and non-information technology assets. We
identified Year 2000 dependencies in our systems, equipment and processes and we
are implementing changes to such systems, updating or replacing such equipment,
and modifying such processes to make them Year 2000 compliant. Each of our
business sites has identified mission critical systems for which contingency
plans are being developed in the event of any disruption caused by Year 2000
problems. Testing of our mission critical primary business transaction
applications has been completed and all remaining testing is scheduled for
completion by the end of July 1999.
We are vulnerable to the failure of any of our key suppliers to remedy
their Year 2000 issues. Such a failure could delay shipment of essential
components and disrupt or even halt our manufacturing operations. While all our
suppliers are being notified of our Year 2000 compliance requirements, we have
established specific reviews with our critical suppliers, and they are requested
to report their progress to us on a quarterly basis. We regularly monitor this
progress and are actively involved with a few suppliers that are behind
schedule.
We are also communicating with our large customers to determine the extent
to which we are vulnerable to their failure to remedy their own Year 2000
issues. We also rely, both domestically and internationally, upon governmental
agencies, utility companies, telecommunication service companies, transportation
service providers and other service providers outside of our control. We have
less control over assessing and remediating Year 2000 issues of third parties.
As a result, we cannot insure that these third parties will not suffer business
disruption caused by a Year 2000 issue, which, in turn, could materially harm
our business.
Expenditures related to our Year 2000 project, which excludes normal
replacement of existing capital assets, were approximately $10.0 million through
March 27, 1999 and are expected to amount to approximately $20.0 million in
total. Based on work to date, we believe that the Year 2000 issue will not pose
significant operational problems for us. However, if we don't complete our
remediation efforts on time, or if we fail to identify all Year 2000
dependencies in our systems, equipment or processes or those of our suppliers,
customers or other organizations on which we rely, it could harm our business,
resulting in delays in the manufacture or delivery of our products. As a result,
we are developing contingency plans in the event such problems arise. We expect
to complete the development of our contingency plans by the end of September
1999.
Many of our disclosures and announcements regarding our products and Year
2000 programs are intended to constitute "Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure" as
defined in the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act. The Act
provides added protection from liability for certain public and private
statements concerning an entity's Year 2000 readiness and the Year 2000
readiness of it products and services. The Act also potentially provides added
protection from liability for certain types of Year 2000 disclosures made after
January 1, 1996, and before the date of enactment of the Act.
22
<PAGE> 23
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
DISCLOSURE ABOUT FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Although the majority of the Company's transactions are in U.S. Dollars,
some transactions are based in various foreign currencies. The Company purchases
short-term, forward exchange contracts to hedge the impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on certain underlying assets, liabilities and commitments for
operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies. The purpose of entering
into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign currency
fluctuations on the results of operations. A majority of the increases or
decreases in the Company's local currency operating expenses are offset by gains
and losses on the hedges. The contracts have maturity dates that do not exceed
twelve months. The unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are deferred
and recognized in the results of operations in the period in which the hedged
transaction is consummated. The Company does not purchase short-term forward
exchange contracts for trading purposes.
Historically, the Company has focused on hedging its foreign currency risk
related to the Singapore Dollar and the Malaysian Ringgit. With the
establishment of currency controls and the prohibition of purchases or sales of
the Malaysian Ringgit by offshore companies, the Company has discontinued
hedging its Malaysian Ringgit currency risk. Future hedging of this currency
will depend on currency conditions in Malaysia.
As of March 27, 1999, the Company had outstanding the following purchased
foreign currency forward contracts (in millions, except average contract rate):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MARCH 27, 1999
------------------------------------
WEIGHTED
CONTRACT AVERAGE UNREALIZED
AMOUNT CONTRACT RATE LOSS*
-------- ------------- ----------
(U.S. DOLLAR EQUIVALENT AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Foreign currency forward contracts:
Singapore Dollar......................... $57.5 1.65 $2.3
===== ====
</TABLE>
- ------------
* The unrealized losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized in the
results of operations in the period in which the hedged transactions are
consummated, at which time the losses are offset by the decreased U.S. Dollar
value of the local currency operating expenses.
DISCLOSURE ABOUT OTHER MARKET RISKS
At March 27, 1999, the market value of the Company's 5.25% zero coupon
convertible subordinated debentures due in 2018 was $282.7 million, compared to
the related carrying value of $487.8 million. The convertible debentures will be
repurchased by the Company, at the option of the holder, as of February 18,
2003, February 18, 2008, or February 18, 2013, or if there is a Fundamental
Change (as defined in the Debenture documents), at the issue price plus accrued
original issue discount to the date of redemption.
23
<PAGE> 24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company was sued by Amstrad PLC ("Amstrad") in December 1992 in Orange
County Superior Court. The complaint alleges that hard drives supplied by the
Company in calendar 1988 and 1989 were defective and caused damages to Amstrad
of $186.0 million in out-of-pocket expenses, lost profits, injury to Amstrad's
reputation and loss of goodwill. The Company filed a counterclaim for $3.0
million in actual damages in addition to exemplary damages in an unspecified
amount. Trial of this case commenced October 5, 1998, and on January 5, 1999,
with the jury deadlocked on the issue of liability, a mistrial was declared.
Retrial of the case began on March 15, 1999, and is continuing. The Company
believes that it has meritorious defenses to Amstrad's claims and is vigorously
defending itself against the Amstrad claims and pressing its claims against
Amstrad in this action. Although the Company believes that the final disposition
of this matter will not have an adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition or operating results, if Amstrad were to prevail on its claims, a
judgment for a material amount could be awarded against the Company.
On February 26, 1999, the Lemelson Foundation ("Lemelson") sued the Company
and 87 other companies in the U. S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
The complaint alleges infringement of numerous patents held by Mr. Jerome H.
Lemelson relating to, among other matters, "machine vision", "computer image
analysis", and "Automatic Identification". The Company has not yet had an
opportunity to evaluate the allegations contained in the complaint. However,
based upon the information presently known to management, the Company does not
believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition or results of operation of the Company.
However, because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of litigation, should
the outcome of this action be unfavorable, the Company may be required to pay
damages and other expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company's financial position and results of operations. In addition, the costs
of defending such litigation may be high, regardless of the outcome.
In 1994 Papst Licensing ("Papst") brought suit against the Company in U. S.
District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement by
the Company of five of its patents relating to disk drive motors that the
Company purchases from motor vendors. Later that year Papst dismissed its case
without prejudice, but it has notified the Company that it intends to reinstate
the suit if the Company does not agree to enter into a license agreement with
Papst. Papst has also put the Company on notice with respect to several
additional patents. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of
this matter will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operation of the Company. However, because of the nature and inherent
uncertainties of litigation, should the outcome of this action be unfavorable,
the Company may be required to pay damages and other expenses, which could have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of
operations. In addition, the costs of defending such litigation may be high,
regardless of the outcome.
In the normal course of business, the Company receives and makes inquiry
with regard to possible intellectual property matters including alleged patent
infringement. Where deemed advisable, the Company may seek or extend licenses or
negotiate settlements. Several such matters are currently pending. The Company
does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operation of
the Company.
24
<PAGE> 25
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) EXHIBITS:
27.1 -- Financial Data Schedule
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K: NONE
25
<PAGE> 26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
Registrant
By: /s/ Duston Williams
-------------------------------
Duston M. Williams
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 11, 1999
26
<PAGE> 27
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description
------- -----------
27.1 Financial Data Schedule
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS OF WESTERN DIGITAL
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 27, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START> JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END> MAR-27-1999
<CASH> 297,095
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 329,867
<ALLOWANCES> 18,405
<INVENTORY> 163,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 806,629
<PP&E> 662,683
<DEPRECIATION> 350,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 1,158,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 653,883
<BONDS> 537,784
0
0
<COMMON> 906
<OTHER-SE> (51,227)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,158,422
<SALES> 2,057,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 2,057,904
<CGS> 2,081,625
<TOTAL-COSTS> 2,081,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 357,344
<LOSS-PROVISION> 2,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 10,139
<INCOME-PRETAX> (391,204)
<INCOME-TAX> 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (391,204)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 0
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (391,204)
<EPS-PRIMARY> (4.39)
<EPS-DILUTED> (4.39)
</TABLE>
