Filing made under
Reg. 230.424(b)(3)
File No. 333-68071
PROSPECTUS
TECHLITE, INC.
195,556 Shares of Common Stock
To be Distributed to SuperCorp, Inc. Stockholders
<PAGE>
The Offering: A "spinoff" SuperCorp organized us for the
distribution to the stockholders of purpose of merging TechLite Applied
SuperCorp, Inc. Value: $0.001 a Sciences, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma
share when spunoff and prior to any into us. Our merger with it depends
merger with TechLite Applied Sciences, upon a majority vote by its
Inc. stockholders. Such vote will be
taken after the spinoff distribution
of these 195,556 shares. The outcome
of the vote is uncertain.
-------------------
Our common stock does not trade on any national securities exchange, the Nasdaq
Stock Market, or any stock market.
-------------------
You should purchase shares in the Neither the Securities and Exchange
trading market only if you can Commission nor any state securities
afford a complete loss. See "Risk commission has approved or
Factors" on page 1. disapproved these securities or
determined if this Prospectus is
truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
TechLite, Inc.
4334 Northwest Expressway, Suite 202
Oklahoma City, OK 73116
Telephone 405-840-1585
September 14, 1999
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Summary Information........................................................ 1
Risk Factors ..................................................... 1
1. TechLite proposes to merge with a company
that has an operating history
of losses ........................................... 1
2. Even if the merger occurs, a public market
for TechLite's common stock may not develop,
or, if it does develop, may be volatile
or limited .......................................... 2
3. Post-merger operations may require additional
funds that we do not have ........................... 2
4. Our success depends on our ability to retain
J.D. Arvidson and other key personnel ............... 2
5. Should a change in management seem necessary,
it will be difficult for the non-management
stockholders to do this ............................. 2
6. The business of Applied Sciences may suffer
should we no longer be able to obtain
certain lighting-enhancement reflectors
from two suppliers .................................. 2
SuperCorp - The Distributing Stockholder................................... 3
SuperCorp May be Deemed to be an Underwriter....................... 3
SuperCorp's Exposure as a Control Person.................... 4
Earlier SuperCorp Spinoff-Merger Transactions ............................. 4
Terms of the Transaction................................................... 6
Terms of the Merger................................................ 7
Reasons for the Merger and Spinoff................................. 7
Accounting Treatment of Proposed Merger............................ 8
Degree of Management Control of Vote on Merger..................... 8
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal.................................... 8
Compliance with Governmental Regulations........................... 8
Agreement and Plan of Merger....................................... 8
Transactions with Insiders................................................. 8
Services Rendered by Insiders...................................... 9
Plan of Distribution....................................................... 10
The Escrow Agreement............................................... 10
Should the Merger Occur..................................... 10
Should the Merger Not Occur........................................ 10
Probable Acquisition Post-Effective
Amendment Requirement ............................... 11
Terms of the Offering ...................................... 11
Conditions for Release of Deposited
Securities and Funds ................................ 12
Prospectus Supplement ...................................... 12
Financial Statements Requirement ........................... 12
Expenses of the Spinoff and Merger ................................ 13
<PAGE>
Description of Securities.................................................. 13
Common Stock....................................................... 13
Voting Rights............................................... 13
Dividend Rights............................................. 13
Liquidation Rights.......................................... 13
Preemptive Rights........................................... 13
Registrar and Transfer Agent................................ 13
Dissenters' Rights.......................................... 13
Preferred Stock.................................................... 13
Federal Income Tax Consequences............................................ 14
The Merger......................................................... 14
The Spinoff........................................................ 14
Stockholders of SuperCorp.......................................... 14
Other Financial Considerations............................................. 15
Pro Forma Information and Dilution................................. 15
Material Contacts Among the Companies.............................. 17
Penny Stock Regulations ................................................... 18
Information About TechLite................................................. 19
Description of Business and Properties............................. 19
Legal Proceedings.................................................. 20
Market for TechLite's Common Stock
and Related Stockholder Matters............................. 20
Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on Trading...................... 20
Dividends................................................... 21
Registration Statement ............................................ 22
Reports to Stockholders ........................................... 22
Stock Certificates ................................................ 22
Financial Statements............................................... 22
Information About Applied Sciences......................................... 22
Overview ..................................................... 22
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations......................... 23
Results of Operations....................................... 23
Sales....................................................... 23
Interim Results ..................................... 23
Gross Margin................................................ 23
Interim Results ..................................... 24
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses................ 24
Interim Results ..................................... 24
Net Income Before Taxes..................................... 24
Interim Results ..................................... 24
Balance Sheet Items......................................... 24
Liquidity and Capital Resources ............................ 25
Interim Results ..................................... 25
Outlook..................................................... 25
Description of Applied Sciences's Business................................. 26
The Light Fixture Retrofitting Industry ........................... 26
The Market ........................................................ 26
Environmental Considerations ...................................... 27
ii
<PAGE>
Saving Money ...................................................... 27
Other Benefits .................................................... 28
Current Trends .................................................... 29
Sales Methods ..................................................... 30
Production Costs................................................... 31
Competition ....................................................... 31
Government Approval of Principal Products ......................... 32
Government Regulations ............................................ 32
Properties......................................................... 32
Office Facilities.................................................. 32
Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers........................ 33
Seasonality........................................................ 33
Research and Development........................................... 33
Environmental Controls............................................. 33
Year 2000 Computer Problem ........................................ 33
Number of Employees................................................ 33
Venue of Sales..................................................... 34
Patents, Copyrights and Intellectual Property...................... 34
Legal Proceedings.................................................. 34
Market for Applied Sciences's Capital Stock
and Related Stockholder Matters............................. 34
Financial Statements............................................... 34
Management Information..................................................... 35
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management.................................................. 35
Directors, Executive Officers and Significant
Employees................................................... 38
Applied Sciences................................................... 38
TechLite ..................................................... 39
Directors of Applied Sciences...................................... 39
Senior Executives of Applied Sciences.............................. 39
TechLite ..................................................... 40
Albert L. Welsh............................................. 40
Remuneration of Directors and Officers..................................... 40
TechLite ..................................................... 40
Applied Sciences................................................... 40
Employment Contracts .............................................. 41
Stock Options...................................................... 41
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................. 41
TechLite's Transactions with Promoters............................. 41
Applied Sciences's Transactions with
Management ................................................. 41
Interests of Named Experts and Counsel..................................... 41
Indemnification............................................................ 42
Financial Statements Index................................................. 43
Appendix A - Agreement of Merger........................................... A-1
iii
<PAGE>
SUMMARY INFORMATION
This is SuperCorp Inc.'s fourth "spinoff" distribution to its stockholders
of stock in other companies. TechLite, Inc. was formed by SuperCorp for the
purpose of merging into it another company, TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc. of
Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Because our name, TechLite, Inc., is similar to that of TechLite Applied
Sciences, Inc., we will refer to ourselves as "TechLite," "we" or "us" and to
TechLite Applied Sciences as "Applied Sciences."
Applied Sciences retrofits lighting fixtures in buildings in such a way as
to significantly reduce electricity consumption. Our merger with it is
contingent upon the stockholders of Applied Sciences voting to approve the
merger at a special stockholders' meeting to be held soon.
TechLite has no business or assets other than $245 in cash. We do have a
stockholder base of more than 600 stockholders, thanks to this spinoff by
SuperCorp. We offer our stockholder base to the Applied Sciences stockholders.
We believe this will provide sufficient benefit to them that they will approve
the merger.
We believe the receipt of spinoff shares in TechLite will result in your
realizing negligible or no taxable income.
SuperCorp is distributing pro rata to its stockholders one share of
TechLite common stock for each 34.81 shares of SuperCorp common stock
outstanding.
TechLite's address and telephone number is on the cover page of this
Prospectus. The addresses and telephone numbers of SuperCorp and Applied
Sciences are as follows:
SuperCorp Inc. TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc.
Suite 202 Suite 101
4334 Northwest Expressway 6106 East 32nd Place
Oklahoma City, OK 73116 Tulsa, OK 74135
Telephone: 405-840-1585 Telephone: 918-664-1441
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following factors:
1. TechLite Proposes to Merge with a Company That Has an Operating History
of Losses.
Applied Sciences has operated at a loss for its six years of existence.
Its accumulated deficit at the end of its 1999 fiscal year (January 31, 1999)
was $1,802,167. It operated at a loss (unaudited) of approximately $128,846 the
first three months of its fiscal year that will end January 31, 2000. There is
no assurance that profitable operations can be obtained or maintained.
1
<PAGE>
2. Even if the Merger Occurs, a Public Market for TechLite's Common Stock
May Not Develop or, if it Does Develop, May Be Volatile or Limited.
There is presently no public market for TechLite's common stock. We
cannot assure you that a public market for the stock will develop after the
occurrence of the merger or, if one develops, that it will be sustained. Any
market that develops for the common stock likely will be volatile, and trading
in the stock likely will be limited. This can affect your ability to sell the
shares you receive in this spinoff distribution.
3. Post-Merger Operations May Require Additional Funds That We Do Not Have.
Should the proposed merger be approved, the post-merger company may need
additional funding to achieve its plan of operations. If so, we have not
identified the source for this funding. We give no assurance that the needed
funds can be obtained.
4. Our Success Depends On Our Ability to Retain J.D. Arvidson and Other Key
Personnel.
Should the merger occur, the post-merger company will be reliant on the
continued services of several key personnel. The loss of any of them could
adversely affect future operations. These persons are J. D. Arvidson, chief
executive officer of Applied Sciences; C. O. Sage, executive vice president and
chief operating officer; Carol E. Sage, corporate secretary; and Mark Galvin,
vice president for administration.
5. Should a Change in Management Seem Necessary, It Will Be Difficult For
the Non-Management Stockholders to Do This.
Should the proposed merger be approved, the company's officers and
directors and their affiliates will own approximately 33.6 percent of the common
stock of the company. This amount may enable them to determine the outcome of
any vote affecting the control of the company.
6. The Business of Applied Sciences May Suffer Should We No Longer Be Able
to Obtain Certain Lighting-Enhancement Reflectors From Two Suppliers.
Applied Sciences depends upon two non-affiliated companies to fabricate
and supply the lighting-enhancement reflectors it prefers to use in its light
fixture retrofitting business. These two suppliers are American Illuminetics,
Inc. of Carlsbad, California and X-Tra Light Manufacturing Co. of Houston,
Texas. The business of the post-merger company could be materially affected by
anything that affects the ability of these other companies to supply their
reflectors. Alternate suppliers of reflectors exist, but the quality of their
products is inferior to that of the two companies whose reflectors are
preferred. The future competitive condition of the post-merger company could be
reduced if it cannot obtain high-quality reflectors.
2
<PAGE>
SUPERCORP - THE DISTRIBUTING STOCKHOLDER
SuperCorp Inc. ("SuperCorp") was organized in Oklahoma on October 21, 1988.
SuperCorp has more than 600 stockholders in 35 states. SuperCorp acquired almost
all of these stockholders in early 1989 when it purchased all the assets of
Naturizer, Inc., through a chapter 11 plan of reorganization, in exchange for
shares of common stock of SuperCorp. The SuperCorp shares were distributed to
the creditors and stockholders of Naturizer, Inc. SuperCorp's purpose is to
engage in "spinoff" activities such as the one described herein. Such
spinoff-merger involve SuperCorp's distribution of registered shares of stock of
subsidiary corporations SuperCorp organizes to merge with viable companies. This
is the "spinoff" part of a spinoff-merger transaction orchestrated by SuperCorp.
The "merger" part requires an approving vote of the stockholders of the viable
company - here, Applied Sciences.
SuperCorp's assets consist of approximately $53,000 in cash. Each of its
five directors, Albert L. Welsh, John E. Adams, Ronald D. Wallace, T.E. King and
Thomas J. Kenan, either directly or by attribution through ownership by family
members, owns 452,006 shares of common stock of SuperCorp, which amount is less
than seven percent of the number of its outstanding shares.
SuperCorp is not subject to the reporting requirements imposed by Section
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Its common stock does not trade in the stock market. SuperCorp has
never sought a market maker for its stock.
SuperCorp organized TechLite in May 1997 as a vehicle for the proposed
merger. The company has no business history, $245 in assets, no liabilities, and
initially only three stockholders - SuperCorp, who will "spinoff" its shares in
the company to its more than 600 stockholders before Applied Sciences's
stockholders vote on the merger; Albert L. Welsh, the sole officer and director
of TechLite and a stockholder of SuperCorp; and George W. Cole, whose spouse,
Marjorie Cole, is a stockholder of SuperCorp.
SuperCorp May be Deemed to be an Underwriter.
- --------------------------------------------
The 195,556 spinoff shares described herein are owned by SuperCorp and are
to be redistributed by SuperCorp. SuperCorp may be deemed to be an underwriter
by reason of its intent to distribute such shares.
After the distribution by SuperCorp of the spinoff shares to its
stockholders, SuperCorp will no longer own any stock of the company, except to
the extent that 657 spinoff shares, reserved for rounding-up purposes, would not
be allocated in the rounding-up process.
Should SuperCorp be an underwriter of the spinoff shares, any person who
purchases the registered shares within three years after the distribution could
assert a claim against SuperCorp under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.
The purchase could be in the open market as long as the shares purchased can be
traced to the registered shares SuperCorp distributes to its stockholders. Such
a claim, to be
3
<PAGE>
successful, must be based upon a showing that statements in the registration
statement were false or misleading with respect to a material fact or that the
registration statement omitted material information required to be included
therein.
Open market purchasers may have to prove reliance upon the alleged
misstatement or omission. Reliance may not necessarily require a showing that
the purchaser actually read the registration statement. It may be sufficient if
there is a showing that the misstatements or omissions in the registration
statement were a substantial factor in the purchase of the shares.
SuperCorp's Exposure as a Control Person.
----------------------------------------
SuperCorp organized TechLite and, since its organization and until the
proposed merger should become effective, has been and will be a "control person"
of TechLite, as that term is defined in Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933
("the Act").
Section 15 of the Act imposes joint and several liability on persons who
control other persons substantively liable under other sections of the Act:
o Section 11, for misrepresentations in a registration
statement,
o Section 12(1) - for the unlawful sale of unregistered
securities, and
o Section 12(2) - for misrepresentations in the sale of
securities.
A controlling person can avoid liability by proving "he had no knowledge of
or reasonable grounds to believe in the existence of the facts by reason of
which the liability of the controlled person is alleged to exist."
EARLIER SUPERCORP SPINOFF-MERGER TRANSACTIONS
This transaction with Applied Sciences, should the stockholders of Applied
Sciences approve it, will be the fourth such "spinoff-merger" transaction
effected by SuperCorp with subsidiaries it creates for such purposes.
The Lark Technologies, Inc. spinoff-merger.
------------------------------------------
SuperCorp's first spinoff-merger transaction concerned Lark Technologies,
Inc. ("Lark"), a SuperCorp-created subsidiary. Lark merged with a Houston, Texas
company engaged in DNA sequencing whose major stockholders are affiliates of the
Baylor School of Medicine.
The Lark spinoff occurred on September 6, 1995. The Lark merger occurred on
September 14, 1995. None of SuperCorp's or Lark's officers, directors,
affiliates or persons or entities engaged in management-type activities with
SuperCorp or Lark had any involvement in this spinoff-
4
<PAGE>
merger. None of these persons received any cash, stock or other thing of value
with respect to this transaction other than his pro rata receipt of Lark stock
that was spunoff to the SuperCorp stockholders. Subsequent to the Lark
spinoff-merger, Lark raised $1 million in a rights offering to its stockholder
base.
The Dransfield China Paper Corporation transaction.
--------------------------------------------------
The second spinoff-merger transaction concerned Dransfield China Paper
Corporation ("Dransfield"), a SuperCorp-created subsidiary. Dransfield merged
with a Hong Kong company engaged in distributing hygienic paper products in Hong
Kong and in building integrated paper mills in China. Dransfield's major
stockholder is a Hong Kong Stock Exchange-listed company.
The Dransfield spinoff occurred on February 13, 1996. The Dransfield merger
occurred on February 26, 1997. One of SuperCorp's officers and directors, T.E.
King, received $45,000 from the Hong Kong company, 11,642 shares of common stock
of Dransfield and 250,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of
Dransfield at $5.50 a share as compensation for his services in bringing
together the Hong Kong company and SuperCorp. Thomas J. Kenan, an officer and a
director of SuperCorp, received 20,000 warrants and the other officers and
directors of SuperCorp each received 40,000 warrants to purchase shares of
common stock of Dransfield at $5.50 a share as compensation for their past
efforts in screening prospective spinoff-merger transactions. All of these
warrants expired without being exercised. Each of these officers and directors
also received his pro rata distribution of Dransfield shares spunoff by
SuperCorp to its stockholders. Subsequent to the Dransfield spinoff-merger,
Dransfield raised $750,000 in a private placement to investors in the U.S. and
Hong Kong.
The Summit Technologies, Inc. transaction.
-----------------------------------------
The third spinoff-merger transaction concerned Summit Environmental
Corporation, Inc. ("Summit"), a SuperCorp-created subsidiary. Summit merged with
a Longview, Texas company engaged in marketing a new fire suppressant product
and other products manufactured by other companies.
The Summit spinoff occurred on November 10, 1998. The Summit merger
occurred on December 2, 1998.
None of SuperCorp's officers, directors, affiliates or persons or entities
engaged in management-type activities with SuperCorp or Summit had any
involvement in this spinoff-merger other than Thomas J. Kenan, a director and
general counsel of SuperCorp. The Longview, Texas company allowed Mr. Kenan to
purchase 28,333 shares of its common stock at $0.30 a share in a non-public
offering it conducted at this price before the registration statements for the
spinoff-merger transaction were filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
George W. Cole, a former SuperCorp director and a person to whom Securities
and Exchange Commission rules may attribute the beneficial ownership of more
shares of common stock of SuperCorp than any other
5
<PAGE>
SuperCorp stockholder, received compensation for finding and negotiating the
spinoff-merger transaction with Summit.
Mr. Cole received $18,500 from the Longview, Texas company for a finder's
fee and for consulting services. He exchanged $14,250 of such fee for 23,750
shares of the Longview, Texas company at $0.60 a share prior to the
spinoff-merger. Further, SuperCorp allowed him to purchase 125,000 shares of
common stock of Summit at $0.001 a share when SuperCorp organized Summit.
After each of the above three spinoff-merger transactions was consummated,
SuperCorp director Thomas J. Kenan became involved with each company as an
attorney. He has represented each company from time to time as a securities
lawyer. He received cash fees for such services at his customary billing rates.
He also was invited by Dransfield to serve as a non-management director of
Dransfield and of its Hong Kong Stock Exchange-listed parent, Dransfield
Holdings Limited. He receives no compensation for such director's services but
was granted an option to purchase 25,000 shares of Dransfield at $2.60 a share.
The option has not been exercised. He was invited by Summit to serve as a
non-management director. He receives no compensation for such services.
Albert L. Welsh, the president and a director of SuperCorp and the sole
officer and director of TechLite, and George W. Cole, whose family owns more
than six percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of SuperCorp, are
named elsewhere in this Prospectus as persons who have been involved in
transactions among TechLite, SuperCorp and Applied Sciences. Neither of such
persons has been involved in post-merger transactions with any of Lark,
Dransfield or Summit other than as a stockbroker with regard to the trading of
stock in the open market.
Lark's common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol
"LDNA." Dransfield's common stock trades on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market under the
symbol "DCPCF." Summit's common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board under the
symbol "SEVT." Lark, Dransfield and Summit are viable, operating companies.
Their common stock prices are quoted daily. All three file reports with the
Commission pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
TERMS OF THE TRANSACTION
TechLite, SuperCorp, and Applied Sciences have entered into an agreement of
merger between TechLite and Applied Sciences. A copy of the agreement appears as
"Appendix A - Agreement of merger." For the merger to occur, each of the
following must occur:
o Registration statements must be filed with and become effective at
the Securities and Exchange Commission and appropriate state
securities regulatory agencies. This has occurred. The registration
statements cover the following:
o the 2,209,903 merger shares - the shares TechLite offers to
the stockholders of Applied Sciences, and
6
<PAGE>
o the 195,556 spinoff shares - the shares SuperCorp will
distribute to its more than 600 stockholders.
o The stockholders of each of TechLite and of Applied Sciences must,
by a majority vote of the shares outstanding, approve the merger.
Terms of the Merger.
- -------------------
The terms of the proposed merger are as follows:
1. Applied Sciences shall merge into TechLite.
2. All 2,209,903 outstanding shares of common stock of Applied Sciences
shall be converted into 2,209,903 shares of common stock of TechLite on a
share-for-share basis.
3. There shall be no fractional shares.
4. The present business of Applied Sciences shall be conducted after the
merger by TechLite, into which Applied Sciences shall have merged. Applied
Sciences's management and directors shall become the management and directors of
the combined company.
5. Prior to the merger, SuperCorp shall distribute in a "spinoff" to its
stockholders, on a basis proportionate to their stockholdings in SuperCorp, the
195,556 shares of common stock of TechLite now held by SuperCorp. Each SuperCorp
stockholder shall receive one share of TechLite for each 34.81 shares of
SuperCorp held of record on the date on the cover of this Prospectus.
6. The historical financial statements of the post-merger company shall be
those of Applied Sciences. See "Financial Statements - TechLite Applied
Sciences." The fiscal year of the post-merger company will be January 31, the
end of Applied Sciences's fiscal year.
7. Should the stockholders of Applied Sciences not approve the merger, none
of TechLite, Applied Sciences, or SuperCorp shall be liable to any of the
others. However, in any event, Applied Sciences must pay all three parties'
expenses relating to the registration of the shares described herein.
Reasons for the Merger and Spinoff.
- ----------------------------------
It is obvious that the SuperCorp stockholders will benefit by receiving,
for no consideration, the 195,556 spinoff shares. But TechLite also believes
that the Applied Sciences's stockholders will benefit from converting their
present stock to stock of TechLite in the merger. We have registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the stock involved in the spinoff and the
stock involved in the merger. SuperCorp's distribution of the spinoff shares to
its stockholders should provide the basis for the creation of a public market
for the common stock of our post-merger combined company. We believe the
existence of such a public market will facilitate the raising of
7
<PAGE>
expansion funds for the post-merger company. We give no assurance that such will
occur.
Effectively, the stockholders of Applied Sciences will suffer a ten percent
dilution in their equity in Applied Sciences solely for the perceived, but not
assured, benefits of having a public market for their securities.
Accounting Treatment of Proposed Merger.
- ---------------------------------------
Because TechLite is only a corporate shell and not an operating entity, the
proposed merger will be accounted for as if Applied Sciences recapitalized.
Degree of Management Control of Vote on Merger.
- ----------------------------------------------
The merger must be approved by a vote of a majority of the outstanding
shares of common stock of each of TechLite and Applied Sciences. With respect to
such companies, the percentage of outstanding shares entitled to vote and held
by officers, directors and their affiliates are as follows: TechLite - 90%; and
Applied Sciences - 37.4%. Applied Sciences's officers, directors and affiliates,
even though they are recommending approval of the merger, have agreed to vote
their shares to approve or disapprove the proposed merger in accordance with the
majority vote of the other stockholders.
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal.
- -------------------------------
Stockholders of Applied Sciences who vote against the merger have the right
to dissent and to exercise certain rights of appraisal. If exercised, and if the
merger is effected, these rights would cause Applied Sciences to pay to these
dissenters the appraised value of their shareholdings.
Compliance with Governmental Regulations.
- ----------------------------------------
No federal or state regulatory requirements, other than securities laws and
regulations, must be complied with or federal or state approval obtained in
connection with the spinoff and merger, other than the filing of articles of
merger with the Secretary of State of Oklahoma after a favorable vote might be
obtained on the proposed merger.
Agreement and Plan of Merger.
- ----------------------------
The complete agreement of merger among TechLite, Applied Sciences, and
SuperCorp is included in this Prospectus. See "Appendix A Agreement of merger."
TRANSACTIONS WITH INSIDERS
The 195,556 spinoff shares will be distributed pro rata to all SuperCorp
stockholders of record on the date on the cover page of this Prospectus. An
additional 48,888 shares of common stock of the company are already owned by two
persons, either directly or by attribution to their family members or family
controlled entities.
8
<PAGE>
Both of these two persons, either directly or by attribution, are
stockholders of SuperCorp. Each will receive spinoff shares in the pro rata
spinoff distribution. Further, each owns 10,000 shares of common stock of
TechLite Applied Sciences, which each purchased in 1997 in exchange for
financial consulting services. Both of these persons may be deemed to be
"promoters" or "insiders" of the company who will receive benefits from the
transaction not received by other SuperCorp stockholders.
The identities of the insiders, their positions with TechLite and with
SuperCorp, the securities of TechLite and of Applied Sciences each owns, and his
pro rata receipt of spinoff shares are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Now Owned
--------------------------------
Position with TechLite Spinoff
Insider or SuperCorp TechLite Applied Sciences Shares
- ----------------- ----------------------------- --------- ----------------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Albert L. Welsh President and Director of 24,444 10,000 12,985
TechLite and President and a
Director of SuperCorp
George W. Cole None 24,444 10,000 12,985
</TABLE>
Services Rendered by Insiders.
- -----------------------------
Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole may be deemed to be "insiders" or "promoters" in
connection with the purchase by each of 24,444 shares of common stock of
TechLite for $25, or $0.001 a share. Each also performed services for TechLite
and for SuperCorp Inc. See "Other Financial Considerations - Material Contacts
Among the Companies."
The table below compares the securities to be received by the insiders and
to be received by other SuperCorp stockholders:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Two TechLite Insiders
-----------------------------------------
Other
Type of Other Applied
TechLite's Spinoff Merger SuperCorp Sciences
Security Held Now Shares Shares Shareholders Shareholders Total
------------ ----------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Common 48,888(1) 26,278(2) 20,000(2) 169,278(2) 2,189,903(3) 2,454,347
Stock
Percent 2.0% 1.1% 0.8% 6.9% 89.2% 100%
</TABLE>
(1) Restricted securities. Must be held one year before tradeable under SEC
Rule 144.
(2) Registered with the Commission and unrestricted for transfer in the stock
market.
9
<PAGE>
(3) Registered with the Commission and unrestricted for transfer in the stock
market. However, 825,789 of these shares would be held by affiliates of the
post-merger company (officers and directors and controlling shareholders)
and would be subject to the limitations on resale imposed by Rule 145 of
the Commission. See "Information About the company - Rule 144 and Rule 145
Restrictions on Trading."
For details concerning the direct ownership and the attribution of
ownership of company securities by the insiders, see "Management Information -
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The Escrow Arrangement.
- ----------------------
A vote to approve the merger by the stockholders of TechLite is assured.
After such vote but before any vote by the stockholders of Applied Sciences,
SuperCorp shall spinoff - by way of a dividend - to its stockholders the 195,556
shares of common stock of TechLite held by it. Certificates representing the
195,556 spinoff shares shall be distributed by SuperCorp to Bank One Trust
company, NA, Oklahoma City to be held in escrow pursuant to the provisions of
Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation 230.419 - called herein "Rule
419." Later distribution of the spinoff shares by the escrow agent would be as
follows:
Should the Merger Occur.
-----------------------
Should Applied Sciences's stockholders approve the merger, TechLite shall
supplement this Prospectus and shall file a Form 8-K with the Commission to
indicate the fact and date of the merger. When TechLite's common stock is
declared eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, the company shall
provide to the escrow agent the company's representation that the requirements
of Rule 419(e) have been met. The escrow agent shall then mail the escrowed
certificates representing the 195,556 spinoff shares to the owners of such
securities.
Should the Merger Not Occur.
- ---------------------------
There can be no assurance that the proposed merger between TechLite and
Applied Sciences will occur, because a favorable, majority stockholder vote of
Applied Sciences's stockholders must be obtained. No assurance can be given that
such will be obtained.
Should the merger not occur,
o TechLite will file a supplement to this Prospectus and a Form 8-K
with the Commission to reveal that the merger was not approved,
o Applied Sciences will continue as a separate corporation with its
existing assets and business,
o TechLite still will have no significant assets or business, and
10
<PAGE>
o there will be no trading market for TechLite's stock, which will
still be held in escrow by the escrow agent. As long as this escrow
continues, no transfer or other disposition of the securities held
in escrow shall be permitted other than:
o by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or
o pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined
by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Title 1
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the rules
thereunder.
TechLite's and SuperCorp's management have no specific plans for an
alternative to a rejection of the proposed merger. They would commence to seek
to acquire a business or assets that would constitute a business. Such
management or SuperCorp would pay the costs of such search. The search would be
subject to the following additional requirements of Rule 419:
Probable Acquisition Post-Effective Amendment Requirement
---------------------------------------------------------
Upon execution of any agreement for the acquisition of a business or assets
that would constitute a business and for which the fair value of the business or
net assets to be acquired represents at least 80 percent of the $245 proceeds
from the sale by TechLite to SuperCorp of the spinoff shares, Rule 419 requires
that TechLite must file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
post-effective amendment to its earlier filed registration statement, which
post-effective amendment:
o this amendment must contain complete disclosure documentation about
the alternative business or assets acquisition, including financial
statements of TechLite and of the company to be acquired as well as
pro forma financial information, and
o discloses the terms of the offering, as follows:
Terms of the Offering
---------------------
The terms of the offering must provide, and TechLite must satisfy, the
following conditions:
o no later than five business days after the effective date of the
post-effective amendment, TechLite must send by first-class mail or
other equally prompt means, to each record owner of securities held
in escrow a copy of the prospectus contained in the post-
effective amendment and any amendments or supplements thereto,
o each such owner shall have no fewer than 20 business days and no
more than 45 business days from the effective date of the post-
effective amendment to notify TechLite in writing that he or she
elects to remain an owner of the spinoff
11
<PAGE>
shares registered in his or her name. If TechLite has not received
such written notification by the 45th business day following the
effective date of the post-effective amendment, funds and interest
or dividends, if any, held in the escrow account shall be sent by
first-class mail or other equally prompt means to the owner within
five business days,
o the registered owners of at least 80 percent of the spinoff
shares must affirmatively elect to remain an owner of his or
her spinoff shares, and
o if a consummation acquisition meeting the requirements set forth
above and of Rule 419 has not occurred by a date eighteen months
after the effective date of the initial registration statement, the
funds and securities held in escrow shall be returned by first-
class mail or equally prompt means to the purchaser within five days
following that date.
Conditions for Release of Deposited Securities and Funds
--------------------------------------------------------
Funds held in the escrow account may be released to TechLite and securities
may be delivered to the registered holders identified on the deposited
securities only at the same time as or after:
o the escrow agent has received a signed representation from TechLite,
together with other evidence acceptable to the escrow agent, that
the requirements set forth above under "Post-Effective Amendment for
Acquisition Agreement" and "Terms of the Offering" have been met and
o there has been consummation of an acquisition meeting the 80 percent
requirements set forth above.
Prospectus Supplement
---------------------
If funds and securities are released from the escrow to TechLite, the
prospectus shall be supplemented to indicate the amount of funds and securities
released and the date of release.
Should the above conditions of Rule 419 not be met, the stock certificates
will be returned to TechLite for cancellation.
Financial Statements Requirement
--------------------------------
In the event the proposed acquisition is approved in accordance with the
above conditions of Rule 419, no later than 90 days after the end of the first
full fiscal year of operations following consummation of the acquisition, as
described above, TechLite shall furnish its stockholders audited financial
statements for such year as well as management's discussion and analysis of such
information. This information must also be filed with the Commission under cover
of Form 8-K unless the company is filing the reports required by Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act.
12
<PAGE>
Expenses of the Spinoff and Merger.
- ----------------------------------
The estimated expenses of the spinoff and the merger are $104,300. All of
these expenses are being borne by Applied Sciences, with whom the company
proposes to merge. These estimated expenses are federal and state registration
fees - $100; filing expenses (EDGAR) - $8,000; stock transfer agent's fee -
$4,000; escrow agent's fee - $500; printing and engraving - $10,000; legal fees
- - $49,000; auditor's fee - $6,000; mailing cost - $5,900; finder's fee -
$18,500; and Moody's OTC Industrial Manual publication fee - $2,300.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Common Stock.
-------------
Each of TechLite and Applied Sciences is an Oklahoma corporation. TechLite
is authorized to issue 40 million shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, and
has 244,444 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Applied Sciences is
authorized to issue 40 million shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, and has
2,209,903 shares of its common stock issued and outstanding.
Voting rights.
-------------
Stockholders have one vote a share on all matters submitted to a vote
of the stockholders. Shares of common stock do not have cumulative voting
rights. This means that the holders of a majority of the shares voting for the
election of the board of directors can elect all members of the board of
directors.
Dividend rights.
---------------
Stockholders receive dividends when and if declared by the board of
directors out of funds of the corporation legally available therefor.
Liquidation rights.
------------------
Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up, stockholders receive
pro rata all of the assets of the corporation available for distribution to
stockholders, subject to the prior satisfaction of the liquidation rights of the
holders of outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Preemptive rights.
-----------------
Stockholders do not have preemptive rights to subscribe for or to
purchase any stock, obligations or other securities of the corporation.
Registrar and transfer agent.
----------------------------
Securities Transfer Corporation of Dallas, Texas is the transfer agent
and registrar of the common stock of TechLite. Applied Sciences serves as its
own registrar and transfer agent.
Dissenters' rights.
------------------
A stockholder has "dissenters' rights" which, if properly exercised,
may require the corporation to repurchase its shares. Dissenters' rights
commonly arise in extraordinary transactions such as mergers, consolidations,
reorganizations, substantial asset sales, liquidating distributions, and certain
amendments to the corporation's certificate of incorporation.
Preferred Stock.
---------------
Each of TechLite and Applied Sciences is authorized to issue 10 million
shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par
13
<PAGE>
value. The preferred stock may be issued from time to time by the directors as
shares of one or more series. The description of shares of each series of
preferred stock, including any preferences, conversion and other rights, voting
powers, and conditions of redemption must be set forth in resolutions adopted by
the directors.
There are no shares of preferred stock of TechLite or of Applied Sciences
issued and outstanding.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The Merger.
----------
The merger should qualify as a type "A" tax-free reorganization for both
corporations under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. However,
because TechLite is newly organized, the "step transaction doctrine" might be
applied. If so, the company might be considered a continuation of Applied
Sciences with only a change of name or place of incorporation, a type "F"
tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a)(1).
The Spinoff.
-----------
The distribution by SuperCorp to its stockholders of the 195,556 spinoff
shares will be a taxable event to SuperCorp and to each of its stockholders
receiving any of the spinoff shares. Gain (but not loss) would be recognized by
SuperCorp under Section 311 of the Internal Revenue Code for any excess of the
fair market value of TechLite's stock on the date of actual distribution over
the tax basis to SuperCorp of such stock.
Stockholders of SuperCorp.
-------------------------
As for SuperCorp's stockholders who receive spinoff shares of TechLite, the
spinoff shall occur prior to the vote by Applied Sciences's stockholders to
accept or reject the merger. Because the result of the vote by Applied
Sciences's stockholders cannot be forecast, and because the merger cannot and
shall not become effective until after a favorable vote is obtained on the
merger, it is more likely than not that the fair market value of the spinoff
shares on the date of the spinoff should not have increased over the $0.001
price paid by SuperCorp for the 195,556 spinoff shares.
SuperCorp has no current or accumulated earnings. The distribution is being
made from its excess capital. Each stockholder of SuperCorp should reduce the
adjusted basis of his SuperCorp stock by the fair market value of the
distribution to him, and any remaining portion will be treated as capital gain
in the same manner as a sale or exchange of the stock. This fair market value is
assumed to be $0.001 per share. SuperCorp undertakes to advise its stockholders
in early 2000 should it deem the fair market value of the distributed spinoff
shares on the date of distribution to have been different than $0.001 per share
or should it have had net earnings in 1999 which would cause the distribution,
to the extent of such earnings, to be taxed as a dividend and as ordinary
income.
The above discussion as to U.S. income tax consequences is not based upon
an advance ruling by the Treasury Department but upon the opinion of Thomas J.
Kenan, esquire, in his capacity as tax counsel to
14
<PAGE>
TechLite (which tax opinion is an exhibit to the registration statement of which
this Prospectus is a part).
OTHER FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
Pro Forma Financial Information and Dilution.
- --------------------------------------------
The following sets forth certain pro forma financial information giving
effect to the merger:
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
April 30, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TechLite
TechLite Applied
Inc. Sciences Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Combined
------------ ------------ ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets $245 $ 983,143 $ - $ 983,388
Property and equipment - 691,337 - 691,337
Other assets - 16,221 - 16,221
---- ----------- ---------- -----------
TOTAL ASSETS $245 $ 1,690,701 $ - $ 1,690,946
==== =========== ========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
Current liabilities $ - $ 828,432 $ - $ 828,432
Long term liabilities - 1,413,024 - 1,413,024
----- ----------- ---------- -----------
Total liabilities - 2,241,456 - $ 2,241,456
----- ----------- ---------- -----------
stockholders' equity:
Common stock 245 2,210 - 2,455
Additional paid-in capital - 1,378,048 - 1,378,048
Retained earnings (deficit) - (1,931,013) - (1,931,013)
----- ----------- ---------- -----------
Total stockholders' equity 245 (550,755) - (550,510)
---- ----------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND $245 $ 1,690,701 $ - $ 1,690,946
==== =========== ========== ===========
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Pro forma book value per share $ (0.22)
==========
</TABLE>
NOTE: Pro forma book value per share is calculated by dividing Total
stockholders' Equity - $(550,510) - by the total number of shares that
would have been outstanding on April 30, 1999 (2,454,347), giving effect
to the proposed merger.
15
<PAGE>
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF INCOME
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1999
and
Three-Month Period Ended April 30, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 1999 Three Months Ended April 30, 1999 (Unaudited)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TechLite TechLite TechLite TechLite
Inc. App. Sci. Pro Forma Pro Forma Inc. App. Sci. Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Combined (Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Combined
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales $ - $4,646,858 $ - $4,646,858 $ - $1,242,217 $ - $1,242,217
Cost of Sales - 3,288,204 - 3,288,204 - 898,008 - 898,008
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Gross profit - 1,358,654 - 1,358,654 - 344,209 - 344,209
Operating expenses - 1,472,865 - 1,472,865 - 481,964 - 481,964
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Loss from operations - (114,211) - (114,211) - (137,755) - (137,755)
Other income - 8,767 - 8,767 - 8,909 - 8,909
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ -----------
Income (loss) before
taxes (105,444) - (105,444) (128,846) - (128,846)
Provision for taxes - - - - - 0 - 0
---------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------ ----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ - $ (105,444) $ - $ (105,444) $ - $ (128,846) $ - $ (128,846)
========== ========== ============ ========== ========== ========== ============ ==========
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
Net income (loss) $ (105,444) - $ (105,444) $ (128,846) - $ (128,846)
Weighted-average
number of shares
outstanding 2,209,903 244,444 2,454,347 2,209,903 244,444 2,454,347
(Loss) per share - $(0.05) - $(0.05) - $(0.06) $(0.05)
</TABLE>
NOTES:
(1) Earnings per share data shown above are applicable for both primary and
fully diluted.
(2) Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the combined entity
includes all shares issued as of April 30, 1999 as if outstanding as of the
beginning of the period.
16
<PAGE>
Material Contacts Among the Companies.
- -------------------------------------
Thomas J. Kenan of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, is a director and general
counsel of SuperCorp. In 1995 he was introduced to J.D. Arvidson, president of
Applied Sciences, by Rex Frates of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Mr. Frates is an investor
and industrialist who was then considering investing funds in Applied Sciences.
Mr. Kenan followed the development of Applied Sciences thereafter. In 1996 Mr.
Kenan advised Albert L. Welsh, president and a director of SuperCorp, and George
W. Cole, whose spouse, Marjorie J. Cole is a significant stockholder of
SuperCorp, to contact Mr. Arvidson. Mr. Kenan told them that Mr. Arvidson's
company was in need of financial advisers with respect to its structure and
direction. Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole both are stockbrokers and former underwriters
of registered stock offerings.
Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole became financial advisers to Applied Sciences in
1997. Mr. Kenan performed legal services for it from time to time in 1996 and in
1997. In early 1997 Mr. Kenan accepted 90,000 shares (giving effect to a
subsequent 35-for-one stock split) of common stock of Applied Sciences in
exchange for legal services performed with regard to reorganizing the capital
structure of Applied Sciences. Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole each received 10,000
shares (giving effect to a subsequent 35-for-one stock split) of common stock of
Applied Sciences for providing financial advice with regard to reorganizing its
capital structure.
Mr. Kenan subsequently transferred (1) 85,000 shares of his Applied
Sciences stock to a trust, the Marilyn C. Kenan Trust, whose trustee and primary
beneficiary is Mr. Kenan's spouse, Marilyn C. Kenan, and (2) 5,000 of his shares
to Sherie Adams, Mr. Kenan's legal assistant, as a bonus to her regular salary.
Mr. Cole transferred his 10,000 shares to his spouse, Marjorie J. Cole.
Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole, in approximately March 1997, persuaded the
directors of Applied Sciences to consider recommending to their stockholders the
merger described in this Prospectus.
The SuperCorp directors also favorably considered the spinoff- merger
transaction. They created a subsidiary corporation, TechLite, to be available to
merge with Applied Sciences. They caused SuperCorp to purchase 244,440 shares of
common stock of TechLite at $0.001 a share, to be distributed to other SuperCorp
stockholders as a dividend. They also authorized the sale of 24,444 shares of
common stock of TechLite to each of Mr. Welsh and Mr. Cole in recognition of
their services to the SuperCorp stockholders in persuading the directors of
Applied Sciences to consider the merger described herein.
Other than the proposed spinoff and merger described herein, there have
been no material contracts, arrangements, understandings, relationships,
negotiations or transactions among Applied Sciences, TechLite, and SuperCorp
during the periods for which financial statements appear herein.
17
<PAGE>
PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS
There is no way to predict a price range within which TechLite's common
stock will trade. We expect trading to commence on the OTC Bulletin Board at a
price less than $5 a share. Accordingly, TechLite's common stock, initially at
least, would be subject to the rules governing "penny stocks."
A "penny stock" is any stock that:
o sells for less than $5 a share.
o is not listed on an exchange or authorized for quotation on
The Nasdaq Stock Market, and
o is not a stock of a "substantial issuer." TechLite is not now a
"substantial issuer" and cannot become one until it has net
tangible assets of at least $5 million, which it does not now have.
There are statutes and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") that impose a strict regimen on brokers that
recommend penny stocks.
The Penny Stock Suitability Rule
--------------------------------
Before a broker-dealer can recommend and sell a penny stock to a new
customer who is not an institutional accredited investor, the broker-dealer must
obtain from the customer information concerning the person's financial
situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Then, the
broker-dealer must "reasonably determine" (1) that transactions in penny stocks
are suitable for the person and (2) that the person, or his advisor, is capable
of evaluating the risks in penny stocks.
After making this determination, the broker-dealer must furnish the
customer with a written statement setting forth the basis for this suitability
determination. The customer must sign and date a copy of the written statement
and return it to the broker-dealer.
Finally the broker-dealer must also obtain from the customer a written
agreement to purchase the penny stock, identifying the stock and the number of
shares to be purchased.
The above exercise delays a proposed transaction. It causes many
broker-dealer firms to adopt a policy of not allowing their representatives to
recommend penny stocks to their customers.
The Penny Stock Suitability Rule, described above, and the Penny Stock
Disclosure Rule, described below, do not apply to the following:
o transactions not recommended by the broker-dealer,
o sales to institutional accredited investors,
18
<PAGE>
o sales to "established customers" of the broker-dealer persons who
either have had an account with the broker-dealer for at least a
year or who have effected three purchases of penny stocks with the
broker-dealer on three different days involving three different
issuers, and
o transactions in penny stocks by broker-dealers whose income from
penny stock activities does not exceed five percent of their total
income during certain defined periods.
The Penny Stock Disclosure Rule
-------------------------------
Another Commission rule - the Penny Stock Disclosure Rule requires a
broker-dealer, who recommends the sale of a penny stock to a customer in a
transaction not exempt from the suitability rule described above, to furnish the
customer with a "risk disclosure document." This document includes a description
of the penny stock market and how it functions, its inadequacies and
shortcomings, and the risks associated with investments in the penny stock
market. The broker-dealer must also disclose the stock's bid and ask price
information and the dealer's and salesperson's compensation related to the
proposed transaction. Finally, the customer must be furnished with a monthly
statement including prescribed information relating to market and price
information concerning the penny stocks held in the customer's account.
Effects of the Rule
-------------------
The above penny stock regulatory scheme is a response by the Congress and
the Commission to known abuses in the telemarketing of low-priced securities by
"boiler shop" operators. The scheme imposes market impediments on the sale and
trading of penny stocks. It has a limiting effect on a stockholder's ability to
resell a penny stock.
TechLite's spinoff shares and merger shares likely will trade below $5 a
share on the OTC Bulletin Board and be, for some time at least, shares of a
"penny stock" subject to the trading market impediments described above.
INFORMATION ABOUT TECHLITE, INC.
TechLite was incorporated under the laws of the State of Oklahoma on June
3, 1997. It has no business or significant assets. It was organized for the
purpose of entering into the merger proposed herein. It has no employees; its
management will serve without pay until the merger should become effective.
Description of Business and Properties.
- --------------------------------------
Should the Applied Sciences's stockholders approve the merger, TechLite
shall be the surviving company, but its management shall not remain as the
management of the post-merger company. Control of the company, through the
voting power to elect the entire board of directors and thereby to replace
management, shall pass to the present
19
<PAGE>
stockholders of Applied Sciences. Applied Sciences's present management shall
become the management of the company.
Applied Sciences's present management advises us that it shall continue the
business of Applied Sciences as the business of TechLite after the merger.
TechLite's present management consists of one person, Albert L. Welsh. Mr.
Welsh is a registered representative of Birchtree Financial Services, Inc., a
broker-dealer firm with principal offices in Kansas City, Missouri, and branch
offices in several cities, including Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, where Mr. Welsh is
employed. Mr. Welsh is president and a director of SuperCorp.
Legal Proceedings.
- -----------------
Neither TechLite nor its property is a party to or the subject of pending
legal proceedings.
Market for TechLite's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no present public trading market in the U.S. or elsewhere for
TechLite's common stock. After the spinoff and before any vote on the merger by
the stockholders of Applied Sciences, all certificates representing the 195,556
spinoff shares shall be held in escrow by the escrow agent.
Should the merger be approved (1) the escrow agent will release from escrow
the certificates representing the ownership of the escrowed spinoff shares.
These certificates would be delivered to the more than 600 SuperCorp
stockholders owning the securities represented by the certificates, and (2) the
stockholders of Applied Sciences will receive 2,209,903 shares of common stock
of TechLite in exchange for the 2,209,903 outstanding shares of capital stock of
Applied Sciences.
Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on Trading.
- ---------------------------------------------
Should the merger be approved, all outstanding shares of common stock of
TechLite, except the 48,888 shares held by the two insiders, shall have been
issued or distributed pursuant to registration with the Commission.
Nevertheless, there will be certain restrictions on the transfer for value of
some of the shares.
Holders of the shares who are deemed to be affiliates of Applied Sciences
at the time of the vote on the merger, in order to sell their shares, must
either register them for sale or comply with the resale provisions set forth in
paragraph (d) of the Commission's Rule 145, unless some other
exemption-from-registration provision is available. The resale provisions of
paragraph (d) of Rule 145 refer to certain provisions of the Commission's Rule
144 and require, for sales of the shares by such affiliates, that:
o the company must have been subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act for at least 90 days,
20
<PAGE>
o the company must have filed all reports with the
Commission required by such rule during the twelve months
preceding such sale (or such shorter period that the
company was required to file such reports),
o transfers for value by such affiliates can occur only
either (1) through broker transactions not involving the
solicitation of buyers or (2) directly to market- makers,
and
o each such affiliate can transfer for value, during a
90-day period, no more shares than the greater of one
percent of all issued and outstanding shares of common
stock of the company (24,448 shares immediately after the
merger) or the average weekly volume of trading in such
common stock reported through the automated quotation
system of Nasdaq or the Bulletin Board during the four
calendar weeks prior to placing the sell order with a
broker-dealer.
The above resale provisions of Rule 145 shall continue for such affiliates
for one year after the merger. Then, only the company's reporting requirement
shall continue. When any such affiliate has ceased to be an affiliate of the
post-merger company for at least three months, and provided at least two years
have elapsed since the date of the merger, then even the requirement that the
company file reports with the Commission will no longer be required for such a
former affiliate to sell any of the shares acquired in the merger.
We believe that none of the 195,556 registered spinoff shares will be
subject to any restrictions on trading or transfers for value. We also believe
that none of the 2,209,903 shares of TechLite to be distributed in the merger to
Applied Sciences stockholders - other than 825,789 shares to Applied Sciences's
officers, directors and affiliates - will be subject to any restrictions on
transfer. Accordingly, after the effective date of the merger and the
redistribution of the spinoff shares, there shall be 1,579,670 shares in the
"public float," i.e., subject to no securities law restrictions on their being
traded or transferred for value. We estimate that approximately 675 persons will
own these shares of record. The offering of them for sale could have a
materially adverse effect on the market price of the company's stock. Further,
the affiliates of Applied Sciences will hold an additional 825,789 shares and
will be able to sell these shares pursuant to Rule 144 and Rule 145 of the
Securities Act.
No equity of TechLite is subject to outstanding options or warrants to
purchase, or securities convertible into, equity of TechLite.
Dividends.
---------
TechLite has had no operations or earnings and has declared no dividends on
our capital stock. Should the merger be approved, there are no restrictions that
would, or are likely to, limit the ability of TechLite to pay dividends on its
common stock,
21
<PAGE>
but it has no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future and intends to
use earnings for business expansion purposes.
Registration Statement.
----------------------
TechLite has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in
Washington, D.C., a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 with
respect to the common stock offered by this Prospectus. The public may read and
copy any materials we file with the SEC at the Public Reference Room of the SEC
at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. TechLite is an electronic filer, and the SEC maintains an
Internet Web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The
address of such site is http://www.sec.gov.
Reports to Stockholders.
-----------------------
TechLite will file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
These reports are annual 10-KSB, quarterly 10-QSB, and periodic 8-K reports.
TechLite also intends to furnish stockholders with annual reports containing
financial statements audited by independent public or certified accountants and
such other periodic reports as it may deem appropriate or as required by law.
Stock Certificates.
------------------
Certificates for the securities offered hereby will be ready for delivery
within one week after the date of this Prospectus.
Financial Statements.
- --------------------
See "Financial Statements - TechLite, Inc." for the independent auditor's
report dated September 9, 1999, with respect to TechLite's balance sheet as of
July 31, 1999, such balance sheet, and the notes to the balance sheet.
INFORMATION ABOUT APPLIED SCIENCES
Overview.
- --------
TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc. ("Applied Sciences"), was incorporated in
Oklahoma on November 9, 1992. Its fiscal year ends January 31.
Applied Sciences has been engaged since 1993 in the business of
retrofitting existing lighting fixtures in buildings used for commercial,
education, manufacturing, institutional and health care purposes. It installs
highly efficient reflectors, improved electronic ballasts, and energy-efficient
fluorescent lamps that make possible a 60 percent or greater reduction in
electricity consumption. It does this while maintaining or improving existing
light levels.
Applied Sciences has its headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and branch
offices in Dallas, Texas; Tecumseh, Oklahoma; and Brazilia and Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil. Its fiscal year ends January 31. Applied Sciences has operated at a loss
from inception through the fiscal year
22
<PAGE>
that ended January 31, 1998 and for the three-month period that ended April 30,
1999.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations.
- ----------
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
the financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto and is qualified in
its entirety by the foregoing and by more detailed financial information
appearing elsewhere. See "Financial Statements."
Results of operations.
---------------------
The following table presents, as a percentage of sales, certain selected
financial data for each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 1999
and for the three-month period ended April 30, 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months
Ended
Year ended January 31 1998 1999 04-30-99
------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales 100% 100% 100%
Cost of sales 88% 71% 72%
--- --- ---
Gross margin 12% 29% 28%
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 69% 32% 39%
Net income (loss) before taxes (58)% (2)% (10)%
</TABLE>
Sales.
-----
Sales of $4,646,858 for fiscal year 1999 increased by 271 percent over
fiscal 1998's sales of $1,714,514. The increase was due to work being commenced
on a $3.95 million contract to retrofit most of the buildings of the Tulsa,
Oklahoma Independent School District Number One.
Interim Results.
---------------
Sales for the three months ended April 30, 1999 were $1,242,217, a
decrease of $58,204, or 4.5%, from the $1,300,421 in sales for the three months
ended April 30, 1998.
Gross margin.
------------
Gross margin increased from $197,587 in fiscal 1998 to $1,358,654 in fiscal
1999, an increase of 688%. The increase was due primarily to the low gross
margin realized on work performed in fiscal 1998 on buildings owned by the
Houston Independent School District. Another company had earlier received the
contract to perform this work but had been dismissed due to its unsatisfactory
work performance. Applied Sciences assumed the obligation to complete the work -
and did so, but the contract price was for a lower piece price than Applied
Sciences offers or otherwise accepts. The increase in gross margin percentage is
attributable to the difference in margin, as a percentage of sales,
23
<PAGE>
between the Tulsa public schools contract performed in fiscal 1999 and the
Houston public schools contract performed in fiscal 1998.
Interim Results.
---------------
Gross margin for the three months ended April 30, 1999 was $344,209 or
27.7%, an increase over gross margin of 24.3% for the same three-month period
the previous fiscal year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses.
--------------------------------------------
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased from $1,191,468 in
fiscal 1998 to $1,472,865 in fiscal 1999, or 24%. This small increase, at a time
when sales almost tripled, was due to a concerted effort by Applied Sciences's
management to reduce these expenses at all levels.
Interim Results.
---------------
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased dramatically
from $194,367 during the three months ended April 30, 1998 to $481,964 during
the same period ended April 30, 1999, an increase of $287,597 - or 148 percent -
on fairly comparable sales. The increase was attributable to substantial new
business development costs that were incurred in Florida and in Brazil. These
costs are now being expensed as they are incurred in accordance with recent
changes in generally accepted accounting principles.
Net income (loss) before taxes.
------------------------------
A net loss before taxes of $990,919 in fiscal 1998 was improved to a net
loss before taxes of $105,444 in fiscal 1999. This improvement was due to an
almost tripling of sales (a reflection of work having commenced on the Tulsa
public schools contract), a greater gross margin obtained from the Tulsa public
schools contract than from the Houston public schools contract, and some
reductions made in general and administrative expenses.
Interim Results.
---------------
Net income (loss) before taxes recorded a loss of $128,846 during the
first three months of the present fiscal year as compared with net income of
$121,692 during the same period the previous year. The loss was due to
substantial new business development costs that were incurred in Florida and in
Brazil during this quarter. These costs are now being expensed as they are
incurred in accordance with recent changes in generally accepted accounting
principles.
Balance sheet items.
-------------------
Significant changes in several balance sheet items occurred from fiscal
1998 to fiscal 1999, in particular the following:
o A bank overdrawn position of $10,191 at the end of fiscal 1998
---------------
improved to a cash position of $19,162 at the end of fiscal 1999,
----
o contracts receivable of $416,809 on January 31, 1998 increased to
--------------------
$831,822 at the end of fiscal 1999,
24
<PAGE>
o payroll and sales tax payable of $212,521 at the end of fiscal 1998
-----------------------------
had been paid in full by October 31, 1998 with only current taxes of
$97,110 being on the books at the end of fiscal 1999,
o the backlog of business increased from $594,980 at January 31, 1998
-------------------
to $2,221,777 at January 31, 1999,
o billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
---------------------------
contracts totaling $330,074 at the end of fiscal 1998 had been
reduced to $96,337 at the end of fiscal 1999,
o notes payable of $159,595 at the end of fiscal 1998 had increased
-------------
by 840% to $1,341,011 at the end of fiscal 1999, and
o the retained deficit had increased from $1,696,723 to $1,802,167 at
----------------
the end of fiscal 1999.
The above improvements in balance sheet items were due to the facts that
Applied Sciences increased its sales and gross margin and effected reductions in
costs. The increase in notes payable is primarily attributable to two things: a
$750,000 line of credit necessary to cover the costs of the increase in sales
volume, and a note payable of approximately $400,000 associated with the
acquisition of the home office building.
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
-------------------------------
Applied Sciences had negative cash flow from operations of $714,471 in
fiscal 1999. The principal components of this negative cash flow were an
increase of $404,420 in contract receivables and a decrease of $233,737 in
billings related to costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. It
increased its property, land and equipment by $561,640 in fiscal 1999. This
drain on liquidity and capital resources was covered by the sale of $113,857 of
common stock and by new borrowings of $1,576,231. A positive item at fiscal 1999
year-end was contracts receivable of $831,822, double that of $416,809 at fiscal
1998 year-end.
Interim Results.
---------------
Applied Sciences made $683,463 in principal payments on notes
receivable during the quarter that ended April 30, 1999 but had $755,476 in new
borrowings, a net increase of $72,013 in long-term debt. Its loss from
operations of $128,846 during this fiscal quarter was financed from the new
borrowings and from increases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities.
Outlook.
-------
The statements contained in this Outlook are based on current
expectations. These statements are forward-looking, and actual results may vary
materially.
Applied Sciences expects sales to increase from $4.6 million in fiscal
1999 (which ended January 31, 1999) to approximately $8.0
25
<PAGE>
million in the fiscal year to end January 31, 2000. It expects to realize
earnings of approximately $896,000 in the present fiscal year to end January 31,
2000.
Applied Sciences's future results of operations and the other
forward-looking statements contained in this Outlook and Offering Circular, in
particular the statements regarding projected operations in the fiscal year
beginning February 1999, involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In
addition to the factors discussed above, among the other factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially are the following: the loss of any of
several key personnel; unexpected costs in establishing branch offices; the
emergence of competition not now detected; and a general economic turndown.
DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED SCIENCES' BUSINESS
The Light Fixture Retrofitting Industry.
- ---------------------------------------
In 1992 the Congress enacted the National Energy Policy Act. This law
mandated that many inefficient lighting products, such as the commonly used
40-watt, T-12 fluorescent lamp, be eliminated and replaced with new technology.
Also affected by this legislation are electric motors, other lamps, luminaries,
distribution transformers and electromagnetic fields research.
Also, in 1992 the Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") initiated its
"Green Lights" or "Energy Star" program. This is a voluntary pollution-reduction
program that assists electricity users by providing them with the most current
information about energy- efficient lighting technologies and how upgrades or
retrofitting can be financed.
These two government initiatives - the National Energy Policy Act of 1992
and the EPA's Energy Star program - provided the impetus for the development of
three significant energy-efficient products:
o energy-efficient fluorescent lamps,
o improved electronic ballasts, and
o highly efficient reflectors.
The retrofitting of existing fixtures with these three improvements makes
possible (1) up to a 60 percent or greater reduction in power consumption while
(2) maintaining or even improving current light levels. The business of Applied
Sciences is selling and installing these and related products. This involves
designing or adapting the reflectors for each lighting fixture in a customer's
building. Frequently, electricity savings pay for the cost of retrofitting in
one to three years.
The Market.
- ----------
There are more than 2.5 billion light fixtures in the nation that would
benefit from an energy-efficient lighting retrofit. Of that
26
<PAGE>
number, only approximately 50 million, or less than two percent, have been
converted. We estimate that more than 1 billion of these retrofittable units are
in the central U.S. States, where Applied Sciences has targeted its business
plan.
The estimated one billion fixtures for the central U.S. States that are
retrofittable provide a total available market of approximately $50 billion.
Applied Sciences's five-year business plan projects that it will have sales
aggregating $239 million, which is less than 0.5 percent of the market in this
area.
Environmental Considerations.
- ----------------------------
Generating electricity involves burning fossil fuels - coal, oil, or
natural gas - or running a nuclear reactor or a hydroelectric plant. The mining
and transportation of fossil fuels can result in various types of pollution.
Burning fossil fuels emits air pollutants from smokestacks, including carbon
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Today the EPA is increasingly
focusing on pollution prevention. If the nation uses less electricity to deliver
an energy service - such as lighting - the power plants that produce the
electricity burn less fuel and thus generate less pollution.
Lighting accounts for 20 to 25 percent of all electricity sold in the U.S.
Lighting for industry, stores, offices and warehouses represents 80 to 90
percent of total lighting electricity use. Every kilowatt hour of lighting
electricity not used prevents emissions of 1.5 pounds of carbon dioxide, 5.8
grams of sulfur dioxide, and 2.5 grams of nitrogen oxides. If energy efficient
lighting were used where profitable, the nation's demand for electricity would
be cut by more than 10 percent. This would result in annual reductions of 2.2
million metric tons of carbon dioxide -the equivalent of taking 44 million cars
off the road; 1.3 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide; and 600,000 metric tons
of nitrogen oxides. These reductions represent twelve percent of U.S. utility
emissions.
Saving Money.
- ------------
The EPA's Energy Star upgrade program focuses on achieving energy savings
under circumstances that save money for the electricity user. Businesses that
have made the investment in retrofit lighting because of the development of
highly efficient reflectors, improved electronic ballasts, and energy-efficient
fluorescent lamps - have cut their electric bills by up to 60 percent or more
and have experienced an average return on their retrofit investment of 35
percent or more.
The new electronic ballast is ten to fifteen percent more efficient than
the standard magnetic ballast now in widespread use. Newly developed compact
fluorescent lamps convert most of their electricity into light - not heat. They
are four times more efficient than standard incandescent lights. They can last
nine to fifteen times longer. New lighting systems that include the smaller
diameter "T-8" fluorescent lamps that replace the old 40-watt T-12 "cool white"
fluorescent lamps can increase lumens per watt to over 100, as opposed
27
<PAGE>
to the current standard of 60. By substituting these new systems, offices
improve their lighting quality while reducing energy costs.
Occupancy sensors keep lights on when motion is detected and turn lights
off when motion is not detected. They ensure that lights are in use only when
needed.
Of a special importance is the development of lighting enhancement
reflectors for fluorescent light fixtures. Utilizing a mirror-like permanent
specular coating on a metal substrate and ray- tracing software, reflector
manufacturers can bend the mirrored strips into intricate shapes to achieve
desired photometric results. Applied Sciences makes use of these lighting
enhancement reflectors. This requires a fixture-by-fixture retrofitting by
Applied Sciences but, together with the other energy-efficient improvements
noted above, it enables Applied Sciences to provide the ultimate
energy-efficient and cost saving retrofitting services available anywhere.
Consider, for example, a convenience store, operating 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. It usually pays the highest commercial rates, because of the
relatively small space occupied. Retrofitting the lights of this business can be
most cost-effective. It can generate a return on investment of over 120 percent
with a nine- to eleven-month payback.
Lighting is one of the largest hidden costs of a total electric bill for
large office buildings - approximately 40 percent. With an energy efficient
lighting retrofit, this cost can be reduced up to 60 percent or more. Further,
if better light is provided at less than one-half the cost, this makes buildings
more competitive in today's lease market. This also provides an increase in
property value. Reducing lighting costs in a facility by $100,000 annually would
increase the property value by one million dollars with a CAP rate of 10
percent.
The retrofit market is currently growing at a 52 percent rate a year.
Applied Sciences estimates that by the turn of the century, less than fourteen
percent of the total fixture population will have been replaced or retrofitted.
Retrofit revenues in 1999 should be approximately $7 billion nationwide. Applied
Sciences estimates that while the east and west coasts may now be six to seven
percent retrofitted, the central, southwest and southeast areas are less than
one percent retrofitted, probably because of lower electric rates and fewer
rebate programs in these areas.
Other Benefits.
- --------------
The new electronic ballasts operate at a higher frequency, 20,000 cycles
per second, as opposed to the magnetic predecessors which operate at 60 cycles
per second. The fluorescent lighting system the electronic ballasts operate can
convert power to light more efficiently than systems run by standard magnetic
ballasts. The higher cycle rate eliminates flicker and hum while using less
energy.
28
<PAGE>
The electronic ballasts prompted the development of the new,
smaller-diameter, fluorescent tube, called the T-8. This new tube takes
advantage of the characteristics of the new electronic ballast and incorporates
the use of tri-phosphor coatings for enhanced color rendition.
------------------------
Because the new electronic ballasts operate 50 degrees cooler, and because
the new T-8 lamps operate 20 degrees cooler with only half as many needed,
air-conditioning costs in a building may be reduced by 20 percent and
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
replacement parts by 50 percent.
- -------------------------------
The development of mini-fluorescent compact lamps allows replacement of
many sizes of incandescent lamps. Power reductions may be as high as 80 percent.
With lower prices and minimal installation costs, these units have become the
most cost-effective of all retrofits. For example, 100-watt incandescent lamps
can be replaced with 22- to 28-watt fluorescent compacts without any light loss.
Ballast life for these mini-fluorescent compacts is expected to be 50,000 hours,
and lamp life is expected to be 10,000 hours.
Current Trends.
- --------------
Many electric light retrofit companies do no more in retrofitting than
replacing four old lamps with two new lamps. The most advanced energy-efficient
retrofit lighting companies, such as Applied Sciences, are concerned with total
systems engineering. These companies sell the concept of re-engineering a
building's lighting system to meet the lighting requirements of the tasks
performed in the buildings and to use whichever retrofit is most cost-effective.
Applied Sciences uses the latest ballasts. They provide a range of ballast
factors (wattages) and proportionate light levels for two T-8 lamps of 49, 54,
58, 62, 71 and 84 watts. Thus, there is immense flexibility for the systems
integrators to achieve desired light levels.
Applied Sciences's systems engineers literally custom-design the retrofit
for each fixture, dependent on its task. The five to fifteen percent savings
advantage over a single-type retrofit more than compensates for added costs, if
any. Lamps are now available in several intensity levels and at least six color
temperatures ratings.
Another technical product recently improved to the point of viability is
the motion sensor. Early problems with the sensors have been corrected, and the
inability to accurately predict savings from these sensors has been overcome.
The manufacturers of lighting enhancement reflectors continue to improve
their products. Single lamp reflectors for two-foot by four- foot fixtures have
added even more low-end versatility. Three-, four, or six-lamp high-intensity
reflectors are now designed for ceilings in excess of 25 feet. These reflectors
have dispelled the myth that those heights were the exclusive territory of 400-
to 1,600-watt metal halide lamps. These improvements and a growing population of
other products, while further enhancing system efficiency, have also
29
<PAGE>
increased design complexity. This makes the market more and more the domain of
the systems engineers.
The business of designing and installing energy efficient lighting
retrofits has become very sophisticated. It demands operatives of a higher level
in both engineering and business. It is no longer sufficient to send
inexperienced salesmen door to door with brochures and big promises; the leaders
in today's industry are sending in teams of highly trained lighting
professionals. Applied Sciences utilizes sophisticated lighting demonstration
units to perform presentations. Its engineers identify and measure extensive
lists of data for a computerized design process.
In 1997, the competitive climate began to change with the emergence of
"energy service companies," called "ESCOs". Several states took steps toward the
deregulation of the electricity supply companies - the electrical utility
companies. One response of the utility companies has often been their creation
of ESCO subsidiaries. These act as general contractors that seek energy supply
contracts. Sometimes the ESCOs negotiate contracts to replace a building's
heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems, to replace the electronic
controls that govern such systems, and to retrofit the lighting fixtures. One
feature of the contracts is to require the purchase of the electricity from the
ESCO's parent company. The lighting retrofitting is generally subcontracted out
to companies such as Applied Sciences. Financing for the package is generally
provided by the ESCOs. Applied Sciences has no strategic alliances with any
ESCOs at present but is seeking them. Such alliances could prove to be critical
in getting business in the future.
Sales Methods.
- -------------
Applied Sciences operates out of six offices. It makes available to each
U.S. office a demonstration machine that is used as a sales device. Within a
single portable unit, there is a television set with VCR for showing Energy Star
and Applied Sciences videos, a rotating watt meter, a light level indicator, a
laser pointer for demonstration of reflectivity, an audio amplifier for
demonstration of hum characteristics, and two two-by-four recessed troffers
mounted on a motorized mast so that fixtures can be raised to a normal position
at ceiling height. The demonstration machine vividly demonstrates the
improvement in lighting obtained from a retrofit as well as the substantial
reduction in electricity usage.
Sales procedures employed today typically commence with a walk- through by
an experienced sales engineer to determine if a building is a good prospect.
Then, a demonstration using the demonstration machine is scheduled. After the
demonstration, depending upon the size of the building, the types of fixtures
observed, the hours of usage and the rates for electricity demonstrated by the
building's electricity bills, an estimate of available savings is made. The
potential customer is asked, based upon these savings, if it wishes to proceed
with a comprehensive feasibility and engineering study.
30
<PAGE>
If the answer is positive, then Applied Sciences and the potential customer
enter into a memorandum of understanding that offers the customer several
options. If the feasibility study shows that all the project goals cannot be
met, or if funding repayable from savings is not available, there is no charge
for the study. If the feasibility study shows that all of the listed goals can
be met, funding is available, and the customer decides not to proceed with the
lighting upgrade, the customer must agree to reimburse Applied Sciences a
predetermined amount for the feasibility study and engineering work done up to
that point. Should the customer agree that the project should move forward,
there is no added cost for the initial feasibility study. Using data from the
engineering study, the systems engineer can determine (1) the best retrofit
solution for the over-lit areas and the under-lit areas and (2) which solution
is most cost-effective.
In October 1997 Applied Sciences commenced a sales effort in Brazil that
resulted in its retrofitting, for demonstration purposes, the eighteenth floor
of the central post office building in Brazilia and a portion of a large
discount store for a French commercial concern, Carrefour Comercio E Industria
LT ("Carrefour"). Following the demonstrations, Applied Sciences made proposals
in July 1998 to each of the Brazil postal system and Carrefour to retrofit a
single building for each and, in the case of Carrefour, 50 stores for Carrefour.
Each of the Brazil postal system and Carrefour later advised Applied Sciences
that no contract would be considered at that time, due to the unstable Brazilian
currency and its devaluation. However the postal system and Carrefour recently
advised Applied Sciences that at such time as the Brazilian currency exchange
rate gets to 1.6 reals to the U.S. dollar, each will enter into a contract with
Applied Sciences - the Brazil postal system for four of its largest post office
buildings (approximately a $6 million contract) and Carrefour for all 58 of its
stores (approximately a $20 million contract). The exchange rate on June 16,
1999 was 1.766 Brazilian reals to the U.S. dollar.
Production Costs.
- ----------------
The cost of materials - lamps, ballasts, reflectors and motion sensors -
should account for approximately 59 percent of a project's costs. Installation
and supervisory labor should account for an additional fifteen percent of a
project's costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses are currently
running at approximately twenty-eight percent of contract revenue. During the
fiscal year that ended January 31, 1999, Applied Sciences had a pre-tax profit
on sales of $4.6 million of approximately two percent. Its selling, general and
administrative expenses are geared to sales of $25 million a year - a level it
has yet to achieve. Applied Sciences estimates that selling, general and
administrative expenses will decrease to approximately ten percent of contract
revenue as the volume increases.
Competition.
- -----------
Numerous companies throughout the U.S. are engaged in the business of
retrofitting light fixtures. Many of these are small
31
<PAGE>
businesses that operate only locally. Even so, they can have personal and
political contacts that make them quite competitive with Applied Sciences. Few
of these competitors offer custom-designed reflectors that add so much to a
retrofit; they merely replace existing fluorescent lamps and ballasts with the
new, improved models. Applied Sciences obtains its retrofit contracts in most
instances when it can demonstrate what it offers in contrast to what a
competitor offers. Competition in the future, however, could arise from
strategic alliances between Applied Sciences's competitors and the emerging
"energy supply companies" -"ESCOs".
Government Approval of Principal Products.
- -----------------------------------------
No government approval is required in the U.S. for Applied Sciences's
products. It buys from others the fluorescent lamps, ballasts, and reflectors it
installs in its retrofitting business.
Government Regulations.
- ----------------------
Applied Sciences, as an electrical contractor, is subject to regulation as
such. State, county or city statutes and ordinances usually require that it have
a qualified and licensed electrician present and supervising each retrofit job.
Further, all installations of electrical fixtures are subject to compliance with
electrical codes in force in virtually all jurisdictions in the U.S.
Properties.
- ----------
Applied Sciences owns a 13,000 square-foot office building located at 6106
East 32nd Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135.
Office Facilities.
- -----------------
Applied Sciences occupies approximately 5,500 square feet of its 13,000
square-foot office building in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It leases, on short-term leases,
warehouse space and additional office space as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Use of
Leased Square Monthly
Premises City Feet Rent Term
----------- ----------------------- ------ ------- --------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Office Tecumseh, OK 400 $ 175 Month-to-Month
Warehouse Tulsa, OK 4,200 $1,275 06-09-2000
Office Dallas, TX 300 $ 80 12-31-1999
Office &
Warehouse Brazilia, Brazil 10,400 $ 400 12-31-1999
Office &
Warehouse Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 250 $ 100 12-31-1999
</TABLE>
The above space is deemed adequate for Applied Sciences's foreseeable needs. As
branches are opened in additional cities, facilities will be leased on
short-term leases for the branch operations.
32
<PAGE>
Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers.
- -------------------------------------------
Applied Sciences has been dependent, and expects to continue to be
dependent, upon single customers for ten percent or more of its consolidated
revenues. However, such customers would not be expected to be repeat customers
once the work for such customers is completed. It has had and anticipates
significant backlogs, but additional staff is taken on to meet all contract
needs.
It depends upon American Illuminetics, Inc. of Carlsbad, California and
X-Tra Light Manufacturing Co. of Houston, Texas for the lighting-enhancement
reflectors Applied Sciences prefers to use in the retrofitting of light
fixtures. Applied Sciences believes that all foreseeable demand for reflectors
can be met. Other suppliers of reflectors are available, but their product is
not always of as high a quality as that of the present suppliers, in the view of
Applied Sciences. For lamps, Applied Sciences depends upon Phillips Lighting Co.
of Somerset, New Jersey; Osram Sylvania, Inc. of Danvers, Massachusetts; and GE
Lighting of Cleveland, Ohio. For ballasts, it depends upon Advance Transformer
Co. of Rosemont, Illinois; Magnetek Lighting Products Group of Nashville,
Tennessee; and Motorola Lighting, Inc. of Buffalo Grove, Illinois.
Seasonality.
- -----------
There is no seasonal aspect to Applied Sciences's business.
Research and Development.
- ------------------------
Applied Sciences conducts no research and development.
Environmental Controls.
- ----------------------
Applied Sciences is subject to no environmental controls or restrictions
that require the outlay of capital or the obtaining of a permit in order to
engage in business operations.
Year 2000 Computer Problem.
- --------------------------
Applied Sciences has determined that it does not face material costs,
problems or uncertainties about the year 2000 computer problem. This problem
affects many companies and organizations and stems from the fact that many
existing computer programs use only two digits to identify a year in the date
field and do not consider the impact of the year 2000. Applied Sciences
presently uses off-the-shelf and easily replaceable software programs and has
determined that all software is year 2000 compliant.
Number of Employees.
- -------------------
On April 30, 1999, Applied Sciences employed 48 persons full time, two
persons part time, and had eight persons under contract as sales associates who
receive commissions on new business they bring to the company.
33
<PAGE>
Venue of Sales.
- --------------
None of Applied Sciences's sales are attributable to exports. It is making
a concerted effort, however, to obtain business in Brazil. Should it obtain a
significant contract to retrofit the lighting fixtures in one or more post
office buildings in Brazil, Applied Sciences believes it will be able to obtain
Export-Import Bank guarantees for up to 85 percent of the cost of materials
exported to Brazil. Applied Sciences has not yet identified the source of any
additional financing it might require to complete a significant contract with
the Brazil postal system. Any contract it might obtain from Carrefour, the
French-owned chain store company, would require Carrefour's periodic payments in
amounts calculated to cover all of Applied Sciences's costs in advance of its
payment of these costs.
Patents, Copyrights and Intellectual Property.
- ---------------------------------------------
Applied Sciences has no patents, copyrights or intellectual property but
does have common law copyright protection for an energy audit software program.
Legal Proceedings.
- -----------------
Neither Applied Sciences nor any of its property is a party to, or the
subject of, any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary, routine
litigation incidental to its business.
Market for Applied Sciences's Capital Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no public trading market for Applied Sciences's common stock.
There are 52 holders of record of Applied Sciences's issued and outstanding
common stock. Should the merger not be approved, no public trading market is
expected to develop. Applied Sciences has declared no dividends on its common
stock. There are no restrictions that would or are likely to limit the ability
of Applied Sciences to pay dividends on its common stock, but Applied Sciences
has no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future and intends to use
earnings for the expansion of its present business.
There are no shares of common stock subject to outstanding options or
warrants to purchase, or securities convertible into, common stock of Applied
Sciences.
Should the proposed merger be approved, all of the 2,209,903 shares of
common stock of TechLite that would be distributed to the stockholders of
Applied Sciences could be sold, either without any restrictions or pursuant to
Rule 144 and Rule 145 under the Securities Act.
Financial Statements.
- --------------------
See "Financial Statements - TechLite Applied Sciences" for the audited
financial statements of Applied Sciences containing balance sheets at January
31, 1998 and 1999, and statements of income, cash
34
<PAGE>
flows, and changes in stockholders' equity for the period ended January 31, 1998
and 1999, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, and for its unaudited interim
financial statements containing balance sheets at April 30, 1998 and 1999, and
statements of income and cash flows for the three months ended April 30, 1998
and 1999, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting practices in the United States.
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
- --------------------------------------------------------------
The following table shows information as of July 31, 1999 with respect to
each beneficial owner of more than 5% of each class of voting stock of TechLite
and of Applied Sciences, and to each of the officers and directors of TechLite
and of Applied Sciences individually and as a group, and as of the same date
with respect to the same persons as adjusted to give effect to the spinoff and
to the proposed merger between TechLite and Applied Sciences (2,454,347 shares):
35
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
---------------------------------
Before After
Spinoff-Merger Spinoff-Merger
-------------- --------------
No. of % of No. of % of
TechLite shares Class shares Class
- -------- ----------- ------ ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
SuperCorp Inc.
100 North Broadway, Suite 3300
Oklahoma City, OK 73102 195,556 80 0 0(1)
Thomas J. Kenan
212 Northwest 18th
Oklahoma City, OK 73103 195,556(2) 80 97,985(3) 4.0
Ronald D. Wallace
One Buckhead Plaza, 19th Floor
3060 Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30305 195,556(2) 80 12,985 0.5
John E. Adams
1205 Tedford
Oklahoma City, OK 73116 195,556(2) 80 12,985 0.5
T.E. King
49 Strawberry Lane, Suite 200
Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274 195,556(2) 80 12,985 0.5
Albert L. Welsh
3832 Northwest 69th
Oklahoma City, OK 73116 220,000(4) 90 47,429(5) 1.9
George W. Cole
3535 Northwest 58th, Suite 770
Oklahoma City, OK 73112 24,444 10 47,737(6) 1.9
Officers and Directors as a Group (1 person
before merger, 0 persons after merger) 220,000 90 0 0
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) After allocating one share of common stock of TechLite for each 34.81
shares of common stock of SuperCorp, SuperCorp will have 659 shares
available for rounding up fractional shares.
(2) These shares are attributed to this person through his position as a
director of SuperCorp. SuperCorp owns 195,556 shares of common stock of
our company. This person shares with the other directors of SuperCorp
the voting and investment power over SuperCorp's stock in TechLite.
(3) These shares would be owned by the Marilyn C. Kenan Trust. This trust is
under the control of Marilyn C. Kenan, its sole trustee and sole
beneficiary for her life. Mrs. Kenan is the spouse of Thomas J. Kenan,
an officer and director of SuperCorp. Mr. Kenan disclaims any beneficial
interest in shares of capital stock of the company owned by this trust,
which is a testamentary trust
36
<PAGE>
established in the 1980s by the estates of her deceased parents. The
Marilyn C. Kenan Trust owns 85,000 shares of common stock of Applied
Sciences and would exchange these shares for 85,000 shares of common
stock of TechLite in the merger. This trust would also receive 12,985
shares of common stock of TechLite in the spinoff. Mr. Kenan provides
legal services to TechLite and to SuperCorp.
(4) 195,556 of these shares are attributed to this person through his
position as a director of SuperCorp. See footnote (2) above. 24,444 of
these shares are owned directly by him and were received for his
services as a "promoter" of TechLite. See "Transactions With Insiders."
(5) 12,985 of these shares would be received in the spinoff, 24,444 shares
are directly owned by him and were received for his services as a
"promoter" of TechLite (see "Transactions with Insiders"), and 10,000
shares would be received in the merger in exchange for 10,000 shares of
Applied Sciences now owned by this person by way of direct purchase from
Applied Sciences.
(6) 13,293 of these shares would be received in the spinoff. 24,444 shares
are directly owned by him and were received for his services as a
"promoter" of TechLite (see "Transactions with Insiders"). 10,000 shares
would be received in the merger in exchange for 10,000 shares of Applied
Sciences now owned by this person by way of direct purchase from Applied
Sciences. The 13,293 spinoff shares are attributed to Mr. Cole through
the holdings of 462,706 shares of common stock of SuperCorp held by his
spouse, Marjorie J. Cole - 452,006 shares, the Cole Family Limited
Partnership - 1,500 shares, Mr. Cole - 1,600 shares, Marjorie J. Cole
and George W. Cole -1,600 shares, George W. Cole and a son, George B.
Cole - 1,500 shares, George W. Cole and a daughter, Margaret A. Cole -
1,500 shares, Marjorie J. Cole and a son, George B. Cole - 1,500 shares,
and Marjorie J. Cole and a daughter, Margaret A. Cole - 1,500 shares.
Mr. Cole disclaims any beneficial ownership in shares of capital stock
of TechLite owned by his spouse.
37
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Common Stock Beneficially Owned
---------------------------------
Applied
Sciences' Common TechLite Common
Before Merger After Merger
------------------ --------------
No. of % of No. of % of
Applied Sciences shares Class shares Class
- ---------------- --------- ----- -------- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
J. D. Arvidson 528,400 23.9 528,400 21.5
9316 N. 147th E. Ave.
Owasso, OK 74136
C. O. Sage 222,292(1) 10.1 222,292(1) 9.1
7902 S. 70th E. Pl.
Tulsa, OK 74133
Gen. Gerald Hahn 1,000 0 1,000 0
3744 S. Niagara Way
Denver, CO 80237-1248
Carol E. Sage 222,292(1) 10.1 222,292(1) 9.1
7902 W. 70th E. Pl.
Tulsa, OK 74133
Mark D. Galvin 74,097 3.4 74,097 3.0
5412 Harvard
Bartlesville, OK 74006
Rex D. Frates 148,056 6.7 148,056 6.0
2626 East 28th Street
Tulsa, OK 74114
Officers and Directors 825,789 37.4 825,789 33.6
as a group (5 persons)
</TABLE>
- -------------------------
(1) These shares are held in joint tenancy with right of survivorship by C.
O. Sage and Carol E. Sage, husband and wife, who own 222,292 shares in
the aggregate.
Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees.
- -------------------------------------------------------
Set forth below are the names and terms of office of the directors, executive
officers and significant employees of Applied Sciences and TechLite and a
description of the business experience of each.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Applied Sciences:
----------------
Office Held Term of
Person Office Since Office
------ ------ ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
J. D. Arvidson, 60 Chief Executive Officer, President 1992 1999
and Director
C. O. Sage, 66 Executive Vice President, Chief 1992 1999
Operating Officer, and Director
</TABLE>
38
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S> <C> <C> <C>
General Gerald Hahn, USAF (Ret.), 61 Chairman of the Board of 1997 1999
Directors
Carol E. Sage, 62 Secretary 1994 1999
Mark D. Galvin, 45 Vice President 1993 1999
Lee Arehart, 64 Sales Director, Tulsa Office 1997 1999
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TechLite.
--------
Office Held Term of
Person Office Since Office
------ ------ ----- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Albert L. Welsh, 67 President, Secretary and Director 1997 9-98
</TABLE>
Directors of Applied Sciences.
-----------------------------
J. D. "Jim" Arvidson.
--------------------
Mr. Arvidson has 33 years of experience in construction contracting and
management. He was engaged for 23 years in the design and construction of grain
silos, forage silos and mechanical conveyance systems. He was then involved in
the construction of commercial buildings, which construction involved interior
lighting design. Mr. Arvidson is the principal founder of Applied Sciences and
has been its chief executive officer since its founding in 1992.
C. O. Sage.
----------
Mr. Sage has more than 25 years' experience in various agriculture-related
businesses, one being the building and management of a 35,000-head cattle
feeding business. He served for almost ten years as Assistant to the State
Treasurer of Oklahoma in charge of the operations of the State Treasurer's
office. Mr. Sage was one of the founders of Applied Sciences and has been
employed by it in his present capacity since it was founded in 1992.
General Gerald Hahn.
-------------------
General Hahn retired from the U.S. Air Force in 1994 after a 32-year
career, during which he developed expertise in the area of logistics and
financial management. From 1994 until the present, he has been employed as
president of Hahn Consulting and acts as an independent consultant to the
management of companies.
Senior Executives of Applied Sciences.
-------------------------------------
Carol E. Sage.
-------------
Ms. Sage's early professional experience was as the office manager for W-W
Feeders, a cattle feeding business. Then, she managed for ten years the audit
department of the Office of the State Treasurer of Oklahoma. Prior to joining
the company, she served as a legal secretary from 1988 until 1994 in the law
firm of Paula Sage, attorney. In 1994 she joined Applied Sciences as its
Secretary and as a bookkeeper. She is the spouse of C. O. Sage, a director,
executive vice president, and chief operating officer.
39
<PAGE>
Mark G. Galvin.
--------------
Mr. Galvin received a Master of Business Administration degree from
Oklahoma State University in 1994. Prior to joining Applied Sciences in May 1993
and while still a student, he designed and developed custom software. He is the
co-developer of Applied Sciences' software which automated the presentation
materials of Applied Sciences and its lighting survey functions. He served as
the project manager for the Oral Roberts University and Edmond, Oklahoma public
schools lighting projects, which were completed ahead of schedule and below
budget.
Lee Arehart.
-----------
Prior to joining Applied Sciences in 1993, Mr. Arehart was the owner of
businesses involved in retail management, recreational facility management, and
franchise operations.
TechLite.
--------
Albert L. Welsh.
---------------
Mr. Welsh received a bachelor of arts degree in 1953 from the University of
Oklahoma and a master of business administration degree in 1958 from Stanford
University. From 1958 until 1963 he was a financial analyst for Ford Motor
company in Dearborn, Michigan. From 1967 until 1970 he was a partner and
principal of Parker Bishop & Welsh, an NASD-member broker-dealer and
underwriter. From 1970 to 1974 he was a private investor. From 1974 through 1985
he was a real estate developer. From 1986 to 1989 he was a registered investment
adviser. From 1989 to 1991 he was an investor in SuperCorp Inc. From 1991 until
the present he has been the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma branch manager of Birchtree
Financial Services, Inc., a Kansas City, Missouri-based broker-dealer firm with
approximately 75 offices. In 1997 he also began to serve as president of
SuperCorp Inc.
Remuneration of Directors and Officers.
- --------------------------------------
TechLite.
--------
Mr. Welsh, the sole officer and director of TechLite, has received and is
receiving no compensation for his services for the company. No compensation is
proposed to be paid to any officer or director of the company prior to the
proposed merger with Applied Sciences.
Applied Sciences.
----------------
The directors of Applied Sciences receive no compensation for their
services as directors. The officers of Applied Sciences received from it an
aggregate of $374,000 of compensation in the last fiscal year for their services
in all capacities. Should the merger be effected, they shall become the officers
of the post-merger company.
Mr. Arvidson, the chief executive officer of Applied Sciences, receives a
draw of $7,917 a month against commission income equal to 23 percent of the
gross profits from retrofitting contracts sold by Mr. Arvidson.
40
<PAGE>
Employment Contracts.
--------------------
Applied Sciences has no employment contracts with any employees.
Stock Options.
-------------
TechLite has adopted a stock option plan which shall survive the merger,
the major provisions of which Plan are as follows:
Options granted under the plan may be "employee incentive stock options" as
defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified stock
options, as determined by the option committee of the board of directors at the
time of grant of an option. The plan enables the option committee of the board
of directors to grant up to 500,000 stock options to employees and consultants
from time to time. The option committee has granted no options.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
- ----------------------------------------------
TechLite's Transactions with Insiders and Promoters.
---------------------------------------------------
The following persons may be deemed to be "insiders" and "promoters" of
TechLite: Albert L. Welsh and George W. Cole. Each of such persons or his spouse
has purchased 24,444 shares of common stock of the company at $0.001 a share,
which shares are in addition to what will be received on a pro rata basis with
other SuperCorp stockholders through the spinoff, all as set forth above under
"Transactions with Insiders" and "Management Information - Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management." Each of such persons or his spouse
also received 10,000 shares of common stock of Applied Sciences in exchange for
consulting services performed in 1997 for that company. See "Terms of the
Transaction - Material Contacts Among the Companies."
Applied Sciences's Transactions with Management.
-----------------------------------------------
Since its inception in November 1992, Applied Sciences has had no material
transactions with management.
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
Thomas J. Kenan, Esquire, counsel to TechLite and a director of SuperCorp,
is named in this Prospectus as having given an opinion on legal matters
concerning the registration or offering of the securities described herein. Mr.
Kenan's spouse, Marilyn C. Kenan, is the trustee and sole beneficiary of the
Marilyn C. Kenan Trust, a testamentary trust that presently owns 85,000 shares
of common stock of Applied Sciences. It also is the beneficial owner of 375,000
shares of common stock of SuperCorp. By reason of these ownerships, the trust
shall become the beneficial owner of 95,773 shares of TechLite by way of the
merger and SuperCorp's distribution of the 195,556 spinoff shares to its
stockholders. Mr. Kenan disclaims any beneficial ownership in the securities
beneficially owned by his spouse's trust.
41
<PAGE>
INDEMNIFICATION
Under Oklahoma corporation law, a corporation is authorized to indemnify
officers, directors, employees and agents who are parties or threatened to be
made parties to any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative suit or
proceeding by reason of the fact that they are or were a director, officer,
employee or agent of the corporation or are or were acting in the same capacity
for another entity at the request of the corporation. Such indemnification
includes reasonable expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement if they acted in good faith and in a manner
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
corporation.
With respect to any criminal action or proceeding, these same
indemnification authorizations apply if these persons had no reasonable cause to
believe their conduct was unlawful.
In the case of any action by the corporation against such persons, the
corporation is authorized to provide similar indemnification, but if any such
persons should be adjudged to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the
performance of duties to the corporation, the court conducting the proceeding
must determine that such persons are nevertheless fairly and reasonably entitled
to indemnification.
To the extent any such persons are successful on the merits in defense of
any such action, suit or proceeding, Oklahoma law provides that they shall be
indemnified against reasonable expenses, including attorney fees. A corporation
is authorized to advance anticipated expenses for such suits or proceedings upon
an undertaking by the person to whom such advance is made to repay such advances
if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be
indemnified by the corporation.
Indemnification and payment of expenses provided by Oklahoma law are not
deemed exclusive of any other rights by which an officer, director, employee or
agent may seek indemnification or payment of expenses or may be entitled to
under any by-law, agreement, or vote of stockholders or disinterested directors.
In such regard, an Oklahoma corporation may purchase and maintain liability
insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation.
As a result of such corporation law, Applied Sciences or, should the
proposed merger become effective, TechLite may, at some future time, be legally
obligated to pay judgments (including amounts paid in settlement) and expenses
in regard to civil or criminal suits or proceedings brought against one or more
of its officers, directors, employees or agents, as such, with respect to
matters involving the proposed merger or, should the merger be effected, matters
that occurred prior to the merger with respect to Applied Sciences.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and
42
<PAGE>
controlling persons of the company pursuant to the foregoing provisions or
otherwise, the company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities
and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX
The financial statements of TechLite and of Applied Sciences appear as
follows:
TechLite, Inc.
Independent Auditors' Report...................................... F-1
Balance Sheet July 31, 1999....................................... F-2
Notes to Balance Sheet July 31, 1999.............................. F-3
TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc.
Report of Independent Auditors.................................... F-5
Balance Sheets as of April 30, 1999 (unaudited) and
January 31, 1999 and 1998.................................. F-6
Statements of Income for the three months ended
April 30, 1999 and 1998 (unaudited) and the
years ended January 31, 1999 and January 31, 1998.......... F-7
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
April 30, 1999 and 1998 (unaudited) and
the years ended January 31, 1999 and
January 31, 1998........................................... F-8
Statements of Changes in stockholders' Equity
for the period ended January 31, 1996 to
January 31, 1999........................................... F-9
Notes to Financial Statements..................................... F-10
43
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Director and Stockholders
TechLite, Inc.
We have audited the balance sheet of TechLite, Inc., a majority-owned
subsidiary of Supercorp, Inc. and a development stage company, as of July 31,
1999. This balance sheet is the responsibility of the company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this balance sheet based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall balance sheet presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the balance sheet referred to above presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of TechLite, Inc. as of July 31, 1999,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/S/ HOGAN & SLOVACEK
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
September 9, 1999
F-1
<PAGE>
TECHLITE, INC.
-------------
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
-------------
JULY 31, 1999
-------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS
<S> <C>
Cash - on deposit in trust account $ 245
=====
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Preferred stock - Authorized 10,000,000 shares,
$0.001 par value - none issued
Common stock - 40,000,000 shares authorized,
$0.001 par value, 244,444 shares issued 245
-----
$ 245
=====
</TABLE>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this balance sheet.
F-2
<PAGE>
TECHLITE, INC.
-------------
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO BALANCE SHEET
----------------------
JULY 31, 1999
-------------
(1) ORGANIZATION
TechLite, Inc. (the Company) was organized in accordance with the General
Corporation Act of the State of Oklahoma on June 3, 1997, for the purpose of
merging with TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc. (TechLite Applied Sciences), an
Oklahoma corporation. The Company has no business operations or significant
capital and has no intention of engaging in any active business until it merges
with TechLite Applied Sciences. Should the merger not occur, the Company would
seek other business opportunities, and if none were found, could be dissolved
within 18 months by a vote of the majority of its common stockholders. The
Company is a development-stage company organized for the merger described below.
The sole officer and director of the Company is a stockholder, vice
president and director of SuperCorp Inc., the Company's parent.
Stock of the Company is owned 80 percent by SuperCorp Inc. and 20 percent
by two insiders. The 80 percent of the stock owned by SuperCorp Inc. will be
distributed to its stockholders upon the effectiveness of the registration
statements to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a
favorable vote of SuperCorp Inc.'s stockholders on the proposed merger. The
distributed stock will initially be held in escrow according to an Escrow
Agreement dated April 17, 1998, among SuperCorp Inc., the Company, and Bank One
Trust Company, NA, Oklahoma City.
(2) MERGER AGREEMENT
The Company agreed on October 16, 1998, to merge with TechLite Applied
Sciences. TechLite Applied Sciences is an operating company in the business of
retrofitting lighting fixtures to obtain reductions in electricity consumption.
The Company will be the surviving corporation (Survivor), but TechLite Applied
Sciences will elect all directors and officers of the Survivor. All currently
outstanding stock of TechLite Applied Sciences in the hands of its stockholders
will be cancelled and converted into 2,209,903 shares of Common Stock of the
Company when the merger is effective. The merger of TechLite Applied Sciences
and the Company should qualify as a nontaxable reorganization under the tax laws
of the United States.
The merger is contingent upon the effectiveness of the registration
statements, and upon the stockholders of the Company and TechLite Applied
Sciences approving the proposed merger. Because the Company is only a corporate
shell and not an operating entity, the proposed merger will be accounted for as
if TechLite Applied Sciences recapitalized. Additionally, the historical
financial statements for the Company prior to the merger will be those of
TechLite Applied
F-3
<PAGE>
Sciences. Upon completion of the proposed merger, TechLite Applied Sciences will
own 2,209,903 shares of Common Stock of the Company or 90% of its voting shares.
The fiscal year of the Company will be December 31.
F-4
<PAGE>
Causon & Westhoff
Certified Public Accountants, P.C.
15 West 6th St., Suite 2310
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
(918)382-7000
fax (918) 382-7005
Independent Accountants' Report
-------------------------------
Board of Directors
TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES,
INC. as of January 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of income,
statements of changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
as of January 31, 1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
As discussed in Note 8 and Note 10 to the financial statements, the Company's
January 31, 1998 financial statements have been revised to reflect $260,705 of
additional compensation expense associated with a debt to equity conversion
which occurred during the year ended January 31, 1998. The Company's January 31,
1999 financial statements have been revised to reflect $194,396 of additional
expense associated with development of the Company's presence in Brazil.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 27, 1999, except for Note 8 and Note 10, as to which the date is August 5,
1999.
F-5
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At April 30 At January 31
------------ ------------------------------
1999 1999 1998
------------ ------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash 54,508 19,162 -
Accounts receivable 900,594 831,822 416,809
Inventory 37,931 41,185 46,378
Property & equipment
Equipment 169,426 162,058 94,515
Furniture and fixtures 31,398 24,045 20,767
Building and land 400,000 400,000 -
Leasehold improvements 56,227 52,252 44,323
Autos and trucks 207,060 191,790 108,900
------------ ------------- -------------
864,111 830,145 268,505
Less accumulated depreciation 172,774 148,665 84,028
------------ ------------- -------------
691,337 681,480 184,477
------------ ------------- -------------
Other assets, net 6,331 7,240 10,943
------------ ------------- -------------
Total Assets 1,690,701 1,580,889 658,607
============ ============= =============
LIABILITIES
Bank overdraft - - 10,191
Accounts payable 541,364 380,543 312,048
Accrued wages 12,308 29,132 31,445
Taxes payable 143,361 97,110 212,521
Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts 47,532 96,337 330,074
Notes payable 1,413,024 1,341,011 159,595
Other liabilities 83,867 58,665 33,055
------------ ------------- -------------
Total Liabilities 2,241,456 2,002,798 1,088,929
------------ ------------- -------------
EQUITY
Common stock, $.001 par value 2,210 2,210 2,204
Paid-in-capital 1,378,048 1,378,048 1,264,197
Retained earnings(deficit) (1,931,013) (1,802,167) (1,696,723)
------------ ------------- -------------
Total Equity (550,755) (421,909) (430,322)
------------ ------------- -------------
Total Liabilities & Equity 1,690,701 1,580,889 658,607
============ ============= =============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Financial Statements
F-6
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
April 30 Years Ended January 31
------------------------------- -------------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Contract revenue earned 1,242,217 1,300,421 4,646,858 1,714,514
Cost of revenue earned 898,008 984,362 3,288,204 1,516,927
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Gross profit 344,209 316,059 1,358,654 197,587
General & administrative expenses 481,964 194,367 1,472,865 1,191,468
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income(Loss) from operations (137,755) 121,692 (114,211) (993,881)
Other income 8,909 - 8,767 2,962
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Income(Loss) before taxes (128,846) 121,692 (105,444) (990,919)
Provision for income taxes 0 0 0 0
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net Income(Loss) (128,846) 121,692 (105,444) (990,919)
============== ============= ============= ==============
Net Income(Loss) per common share (0.06) 0.06 (0.05) (0.45)
============== ============= ============= ==============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Financial Statements
F-7
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
April 30 Years Ended January 31
------------------------------- -------------------------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (128,846) 121,692 (105,444) (990,919)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 27,741 9,888 68,269 44,678
Deemed expense on debt to equity conversion 260,705
Decrease (increase) in contract receivables (68,772) 232,297 (404,420) (294,171)
Decrease (increase) in inventory 3,254 505 5,193 (24,073)
Decrease (increase) in other assets/receivables (2,723) (29,086) (10,522) 17,202
Net increase (decrease) in billings related to
costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts (48,805) (179,165) (233,737) 14,293
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 160,821 80,129 58,304 32,579
Increase (decrease) in other accrued liabilities 54,629 (197,676) (92,114) 153,346
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash provided by operating activities (2,701) 38,584 (714,471) (786,360)
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of equipment (33,966) (5,948) (561,640) (133,870)
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash used in investing activities (33,966) (5,948) (561,640) (133,870)
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principle payments on notes payable (683,463) (10,862) (394,815) (47,236)
New borrowings 755,476 0 1,576,231 128,427
Sale of stock 0 0 113,857 688,767
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
Net cash used in financing activities 72,013 (10,862) 1,295,273 769,958
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 35,346 21,774 19,162 (150,272)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
BEGINNING OF PERIOD 19,162 0 0 150,272
-------------- ------------- ------------- --------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
END OF PERIOD 54,508 21,774 19,162 0
============== ============= ============= ==============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Financial Statements
F-8
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additional
Common Paid-in Retained
Stock Capital Earnings Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1997 480 - (705,804) (705,324)
NET INCOME(LOSS) - - (990,919) (990,919)
SALE OF STOCK 938 687,829 - 688,767
DEBT/EQUITY CONVERSION 786 576,368 - 577,154
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1998 2,204 1,264,197 (1,696,723) (430,322)
NET INCOME(LOSS) - - (105,444) (105,444)
SALE OF STOCK 6 113,851 - 113,857
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 1999 2,210 1,378,048 (1,802,167) (421,909)
(Unaudited)
NET INCOME(LOSS) - - (128,846) (128,846)
SALE OF STOCK - - - -
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, APRIL 30, 1999 2,210 1,378,048 (1,931,013) (550,755)
====================================================================
</TABLE>
See Notes to Financial Statements
F-9
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 1: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
- --------------------
The Company is organized as an Oklahoma corporation located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma. The Company is an energy efficient lighting specialist primarily
engaged in performing retrofits of lighting systems in commercial, educational
and healthcare facilities. The work is performed primarily under fixed-price
contracts. The length of the contracts vary, typically between 1 and 18 months.
Revenue Recognition
- -------------------
Revenues from fixed-price construction contracts are recognized on the
percentage-of-completion method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to
date to estimated total costs for each contract. This method is used because the
Company considers expended costs to be the best available measure of progress on
these contracts. Because of the inherent uncertainties in estimating costs, it
is at least reasonably possible that the estimates used will change within the
near term.
Cost Recognition
- ----------------
Contract costs include all direct material, labor, and equipment costs and
those indirect costs related to contract performance such as indirect labor,
supplies, and tool costs. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted
contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in
job performance, job conditions, estimated profitability, including those
arising from contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may
result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in
which the revenues are determined.
Use of Estimates
- ----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly,
actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-10
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 1: NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Depreciation
- ------------
Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful life of each asset, which is generally from five to seven
years.
Income Taxes
- ------------
Provisions for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for
the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount
of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of
assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at
currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the
deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled as
prescribed in FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. A valuation
allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than
not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized, as explained in Note 6. As
changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.
NOTE 2: CONTRACT RECEIVABLES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Contract receivables consist of:
1999 1998
Billed ---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Completed contracts $ 135,516 $ 106,596
Contracts in progress 685,713 310,213
--------- ---------
$ 821,229 $ 416,809
========= =========
</TABLE>
Subsequent to January 31, 1999, approximately $800,000 was collected on the
outstanding receivable balance.
F-11
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 3: COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS
Costs, estimated earnings, and billings on uncompleted contracts are summarized
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts $ 3,066,461 $ 163,551
Estimated earnings 1,237,926
----------- -----------
40,888
4,304,387 204,439
Billings to date 4,400,724 534,513
----------- -----------
$ (96,337) $ (330,074)
=========== ===========
Included in the accompanying balance sheet under
the following captions:
Billings in excess of costs and estimated
earnings on uncompleted contracts $ 96,337 $ 330,074
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
NOTE 4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consist of buildings, vehicles, equipment, furniture
and leasehold improvements. The vehicles and equipment are depreciated over five
years, furniture is depreciated over seven years, leasehold improvements are
depreciated over ten years and buildings are depreciated over 25 years.
Accumulated depreciation is summarized as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Buildings $ 6,667 $
Vehicles 64,199 36,030
Equipment 61,756 39,392
Furniture 9,641 6,759
Leasehold improvements
---------- ---------
6,402 1,847
---------- ---------
$ 148,665 $ 84,028
========= =========
</TABLE>
F-12
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 5: NOTES PAYABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Unsecured notes payable, due on demand, at 10% $ 76,262 $ 100,563
Notes payable to banks, collateralized by
equipment, due in monthly installments plus
interest through March 2000, at 10% to 12% 121,682 49,607
Unsecured line of credit, at 13.75% 49,500
Line of credit, secured by accounts receivable, at 673,463
12%
Notes payable, building and land, due in monthly
installments plus interest through 2014, at 9% 397,713
------------ ----------
1,318,620 150,170
Accrued interest 22,391 9,425
------------ ----------
$ 1,341,011 $ 159,595
============ ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Aggregate annual maturities of debt at January 31, 1999, are:
<S> <C>
2000 $ 933,776
2001 14,945
2002 15,923
2003 17,439
2004 19,099
Thereafter 317,438
----------
$1,318,620
==========
</TABLE>
The Company has a $750,000 revolving line of credit which is secured by the
Company's uncollected invoices. As work is completed and invoices are submitted
for payment, the Company may place the uncollected invoices as collateral with
the lending institution. The Company may then access the line of credit for an
amount not to exceed 90% of the amount of the invoice. When the invoice is
collected, the proceeds are deposited into the Company's account. The Company
then pays off the outstanding debt on the line of credit associated with the
collected invoice. The risk of collecting the invoice remains with the Company
at all times. The outstanding debt associated with this secured line of credit
was $673,463 at January 31, 1999.
F-13
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 6: INCOME TAXES AND DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
Based on the Company's significant net operating losses it appears it is
more likely than not that the deferred tax asset created by the net operating
losses may not be realized. Therefore, a 100% allowance has been applied to the
net deferred tax asset.
There is no provision for income taxes included in these financial
statements. The net operating losses will be carried forward.
A reconciliation of the income tax expense (refund) at the statutory rate
to income tax expense at the Company's effective tax rate is shown below:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Computed at the statutory rate of 34% $ 30,244 $ (248,272)
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
Net operating loss carryforward (30,244) 248,272
--------- -----------
$ 0 $ 0
========= ===========
</TABLE>
NOTE 7: OTHER ASSETS
At January 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company recorded $7,240 and $10,943,
respectfully, as other assets. Other assets include costs associated with
internally developed software which is amortized over 4 years.
NOTE 8: DEBT TO EQUITY CONVERSION
During 1993, the Company borrowed funds in conjunction with a private stock
offering. The simultaneous stock purchases and borrowings were evidenced by a
document entitled Stock Sale and Stockholder's Agreement, which gave preemptive
shareholder rights to each person who subscribed for stock and loaned money to
the Company. The Board of Directors of the Company recognized that the
preemptive shareholder rights inhibited any significant expansion of the Company
and prevented it from raising funds from the public through the stock market.
All stockholders recorded at January 31, 1997 were requested to exchange (1)
their promissory notes of the Company and (2) their preemptive shareholder
rights for additional shares of common stock in the Company. Outstanding debt
and accrued interest in the amount of $316,449
F-14
<PAGE>
TECHLITE APPLIED SCIENCES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 1999 AND 1998
NOTE 8: DEBT TO EQUITY CONVERSION (Continued)
was converted to equity as a result of this transaction. Additionally, $260,705
was recorded as compensation expense, as required by EITF Topic D-60, to adjust
for the difference between the debt conversion price and other cash stock sales
made during the same year. The financial statements for the year ended January
31, 1998 have been restated to reflect the increase in compensation expense of
$260,705.
NOTE 9: BACKLOG
The following schedule summarizes changes in backlog on contracts during
the years ended January 31, 1999 and 1998. Backlog represents the amount of
revenue the Company expects to realize from work to be performed on uncompleted
contracts in progress at year end and from contractual agreements on which work
has not yet begun.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Backlog, beginning of year $ 594,980 $ 823,540
New contracts during the year 3,173,074 1,485,954
Contract adjustments 3,100,581 0
----------- -----------
6,868,635 2,309,494
Less contract revenues earned during the year 4,646,858 1,714,514
----------- -----------
Backlog, end of year $ 2,221,777 $ 594,980
=========== ===========
</TABLE>
The Company entered into additional contracts with estimated revenues of
approximately $201,000 between February 1, 1999 and April 27, 1999.
NOTE 10: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to April 27, 1999 it was determined that the development costs
associated with developing the Company's presence in Brazil should be expensed
rather than capitalized. The January 31, 1999 financial statements have been
revised to reflect $194,396 of development cost expense.
F-15
<PAGE>
APPENDIX A
AGREEMENT OF MERGER
This Agreement of Merger ("the Agreement") is made and entered into as of
October 16, 1998, by and among TechLite, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("the
Company"); TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("TechLite
Applied Sciences"); and SuperCorp Inc., an Oklahoma corporation ("SuperCorp").
WHEREAS, the Directors of the Company and the Directors of TechLite Applied
Sciences have each agreed to submit to their respective stockholders, for such
stockholders' approval or rejection, the merger of TechLite Applied Sciences
into the Company ("the Merger") in accordance with the provisions of the
Oklahoma General Corporation Act, other applicable law and the provisions of
this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, SuperCorp is the controlling stockholder of the Company;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, undertakings and mutual
covenants set forth herein, the Company, TechLite Applied Sciences, and
SuperCorp agree as follows:
1. Merger; Effective Date.
----------------------
Pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and of the Oklahoma
General Corporation Act, and subject to the prior approval by the stockholders
of each of the Company and TechLite Applied Sciences, TechLite Applied Sciences
shall be merged with and into the Company, as confirmed by the filing by the
Company of a certified copy of this Agreement, a certificate of merger, or
articles of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Oklahoma ("the
Effective Date"). The Company shall be the surviving corporation ("the Surviving
Corporation"). The Company and TechLite Applied Sciences shall be referred to
hereinafter collectively as the "Constituent Corporations." On the Effective
Date, the separate existence and corporate organization of TechLite Applied
Sciences, except insofar as it may be continued by statute, shall cease and the
Company shall continue as the Surviving Corporation, which shall succeed,
without other transfer or further act or deed whatsoever, to all the rights,
property and assets of the Constituent Corporations and shall be subject to and
liable for all the debts and liabilities of each; otherwise, its identity,
existence, purposes, rights, immunities, properties, liabilities and obligations
shall be unaffected and unimpaired by the Merger except as expressly provided
herein. This Agreement supersedes all previous agreements among the parties
hereto relating to the Merger.
2. Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.
------------------------------------
The Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation shall
be the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Company as in effect on the
Effective Date.
3. Directors.
---------
The directors of TechLite Applied Sciences on the Effective Date shall
become the directors of the Surviving
A-1
<PAGE>
Corporation from and after the Effective Date, who shall hold office subject to
the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Surviving
Corporation, until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
4. Officers.
--------
The officers of TechLite Applied Sciences on the Effective Date shall
become the officers of the Surviving Corporation from and after the Effective
Date, subject to such powers with respect to the designation of officers as the
directors of the Surviving Corporation may have under its Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws.
5. Manner of Conversion.
--------------------
The manner of converting the shares of capital stock of the Constituent
Corporations into shares of the Surviving Corporation shall be as follows:
5.1. The shares of capital stock of TechLite Applied Sciences which
shall be issued and outstanding on the Effective Date shall, on the Effective
Date, be cancelled and exchanged for 2,209,903 shares of common stock ("the
Merger Shares") of the Company.
5.2. There shall be 195,556 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par
value, of the Company issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Date ("the
Spinoff Shares") and held of record by SuperCorp, which shares shall, on the
Effective Date, continue to be outstanding and which shall have been distributed
by the record holder thereof, SuperCorp, to its stockholders ("the Spinoff").
5.3 There shall be 48,888 shares of Common Stock of the Company
issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Date and held by Albert L. Welsh
and George W. Cole or their designees or assignees ("the Consultants' Shares"),
which shares, on the Effective Date, shall continue to be issued and
outstanding.
5.4 There shall be no options or warrants to purchase shares of
Common Stock of the Company or TechLite Applied Sciences outstanding on the
Effective Date.
6. Representations and Warranties.
------------------------------
SuperCorp and the Company jointly represent and warrant to, and agree with,
TechLite Applied Sciences that:
6.1 The Company has been duly organized and is validly existing
under the Oklahoma General Corporation Act. The Company has no subsidiary and
does not own an equity interest in any entity.
6.2 The authorized capital of the Company is 50,000,000 shares of
capital stock, which is of two classes as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Par value
Class Series Shares of Shares
----- ------ --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common None 40,000,000 $0.001
Preferred To be designated 10,000,000 $0.001
by the directors
</TABLE>
A-2
<PAGE>
6.3 As of the Effective Date but immediately before giving effect to
the Merger, the Company has outstanding capital as follows: 244,444 shares of
Common Stock, $0.001 par value. No other shares, options, warrants or any rights
to acquire the Company's capital stock will be issued and outstanding as of the
Effective Date but immediately before giving effect to the Merger. The shares of
common stock to be issued in connection with the Merger, when issued, delivered
and sold, will be duly and validly issued and outstanding, fully paid and
non-assessable, will not have been issued in violation of or subject to any
preemptive or similar rights and will be free from any lien, charge, encumbrance
or other security interest or third party right or interest.
6.4 The Company has no liabilities or obligations, whether
absolute, contingent or otherwise.
6.5 As of the Effective Date, the financial statements of the
Company shall not vary in any particular from the Company's financial statements
that appear in the registration statement described in paragraph 7 below.
6.6 As of the Effective Date, the Merger and the Agreement will have
been duly authorized and approved by the Company's directors and stockholders.
6.7 The Company is not an "investment company" or an entity
"controlled" by an "investment company" as such terms are defined in the United
States Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
7. Conditions of TechLite Applied Sciences's Obligations.
-----------------------------------------------------
The obligations of TechLite Applied Sciences to complete the Merger as
provided herein shall be subject to the accuracy of the representations and
warranties of SuperCorp and the Company herein contained as of the Effective
Date, to the performance by the Company and SuperCorp of their obligations
hereunder and to the following additional conditions:
7.1 The Merger Shares and the Spinoff Shares of common stock of the
Company to be distributed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5.1 and 5.2
above shall, prior to the distribution thereof, be registered pursuant to the
provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of the filing of
the appropriate registration statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission.
7.2 SuperCorp shall have distributed the Spinoff Shares to an
escrow agent, as described in the registration statements filed with the SEC.
7.3 The directors and the stockholders of TechLite Applied
Sciences are free to approve or disapprove the Merger in their full discretion.
8. Tax Treatment.
-------------
The merger of the Company and TechLite Applied Sciences shall be
accomplished as a tax-free reorganization.
A-3
<PAGE>
9. Certificate of Merger.
---------------------
Upon the approval of the Merger by the stockholders of the Company and of
TechLite Applied Sciences, the officers of the Company shall file with the
Secretary of State, State of Oklahoma either a certified copy of this Agreement,
a Certificate of Merger, or other required filing containing terms and
provisions consistent with this Agreement of Merger; provided, however, that at
any time prior to the filing of this Agreement (or a certificate in lieu
thereof) with the Secretary of State, State of Oklahoma, the Agreement may be
terminated by the board of directors of TechLite Applied Sciences
notwithstanding approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of TechLite
Applied Sciences or of the Company.
TechLite, Inc., an Oklahoma
corporation
By:/s/ Albert L. Welsh
------------------------------
Albert L. Welsh, President
TechLite Applied Sciences, Inc., an
Oklahoma corporation
By:/s/ J. D. Arvidson
------------------------------
J. D. Arvidson, Chief Executive Officer
SuperCorp Inc.
By:/s/ Albert L. Welsh
------------------------------
Albert L. Welsh, President
A-4
<PAGE>
Supplement to Prospectus, Filing of Form 8-K and Prospectus Stickers
Concerning Proposed Merger. Should the proposed merger described herein be
approved by the requisite stockholder vote and become effective, TechLite will
file a supplement to the Prospectus and a Form 8-K with the Commission, and
insert a box on the front cover of all copies of the Prospectus, in which box
will be the effective date of the merger.
UNTIL _____________________, 1999 (90 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE
MERGER), ALL DEALERS EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN THESE SECURITIES MAY BE REQUIRED
TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS.
