WESTMORELAND COAL CO
DFAN14A, 1999-04-30
BITUMINOUS COAL & LIGNITE MINING
Previous: WESTMORELAND COAL CO, DFAN14A, 1999-04-30
Next: ENVIROSOURCE INC, DEF 14A, 1999-04-30







                              PROXY STATEMENT
                           OF WESTMORELAND COAL

                     Securities and Exchange Commission
                          Washington D.C. 20549

                        SCHEDULE 14a INFORMATION
             Proxy Statement Pursuant to Sections 14(a) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [  ]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [X]
Check the appropriate box:
      [  ]  Preliminary Proxy Statement
      [  ]  Confidential, for use of the Commission Only 
            (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
      [  ]  Definitive Proxy Statement
      [  ]  Definitive Materials
      [X ]  Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 
14(a)-12
__________________________________________________________________

                       Westmoreland Coal Company
__________________________________________________________________

             (Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

              Westmoreland Committee To Enhance Share Value

__________________________________________________________________    
            
              (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, 
               if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X ]  No Fee Required.
[  ]  Fee computer on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(l) 
and 0-11.
        (1)  Title of each class of securities to which transaction 
applies:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (2)  Aggregate number of securities to which transaction 
applies:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (3)  Per Unit price or other underlying value of transaction 
computer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (5) Total fee paid:
        
__________________________________________________________________
[  ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary proxy materials.
[  ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by 
Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the 
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing 
by registration statement number, or the Form of Schedule and the 
date of its filing.

        (1)  Amount Previously Paid:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (2)  Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (3)  Filing Party:
        
__________________________________________________________________
        (4)  Date Filed:
        
__________________________________________________________________

1 Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and 
state how it was determined.

- ------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is added text of a Web Site at 
freedomforshareholders.com.

FREEDOM FOR SHAREHOLDERS
(This appears on the home page)
(a button on this page takes the viewer to the next page which 
offers the following choices)

Filings with SEC
Appraisals
Bodington & Company
Concerned Shareholder Letters
Meet Our Team
Other Voices
(the button on Filings with SEC takes the viewer to the recently 
filed preliminary proxy statement of the Committee to Enhance 
Share Value)
(the remaining pages contain a statement that the page is under 
construction)


The new information will be contained in the Concerned Shareholder 
Letters section.

Harry J. Weitzel, Jr
Spyglass 300D
21632 Spyglass Way
Lexington Park, MD 20653


April 22, 1999

Westmoreland Committee to Enhance Share Value
2789-B Hartland Road
P.O. Box 4004
Falls Church, VA 22043

Gentlemen:

I am a current and long-term owner of 50,000 shares of 
Westmoreland Coal Company (The "Company") common stock.  As such, 
this letter is written in strong support of the proxy being 
solicited by the Westmoreland Committee to Enhance Share Value 
(The "Committee").  My reasons for doing so are several fold but 
all relate to the stewardship of the current Board of Directors 
and Management of the Company; which has been nothing short of 
disastrous.  During Management's six year tenure:

Our Company has been forced to seek the protection of bankruptcy 
twice!  Not only that, Management's handling of the latest 
bankruptcy proceedings nearly resulted in a resolution that could 
have wiped out the common shareholders position in the Company.  
Only the timely and fortuitous court ruling in another case in the 
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in UMWA 1992 Plan v. 
Rushton (in re Sunnyside) prevented such an outcome.


In addition to lasting two years, the latest bankruptcy cost the 
Company nearly $10 million.

The price of a common share has dropped from a high of $22.75 in 
October, 1991 to its current level of $3.75.  Even worse, in June, 
1998 immediately after an adverse ruling in the bankruptcy case 
referred to above, the share price dropped to just $.1250.

No preferred dividends have been paid during five of the last six 
years and the accumulated arrearage now amounts to over $20 
million.  Consequently, no dividends may be paid to the common 
shareholders until the entire arrearage has been satisfied.

Aggregate losses applicable to common shareholders have amounted 
to $(133,026,000).   Absent "Gains from Asset Sales" and Pension 
Expense Credits, the aggregate losses would have amounted to 
$(222,403,000)! Even if the massive one time charges incurred in 
1993 and 1995, are excluded, aggregate losses would still have 
amounted to $(76,530,000). The individual amounts for each year,
which are taken directly from the Company's SEC 10-K filings, are 
as follows:


Year Net Income
Applicable To Shareholders 
Gains on Asset Sales 
Pension Expense(Benefit) 
Unusual Charges(Credits) 
Net Income Excluding Extraordinary Items 

1993  $(102,304) $ 2,000           $ 79,250  $ (25,054) 
1994  $  15,265  $41,130           $ (2,100) $ (27,965) 
1995  $ (91,274) $ 9,088 $ (2,440) $ 66,623  $ (36,179) 
1996  $  33,455  $24,238 $ (3,601) $(11,896) $  (6,280) 
1997  $  23,268  $   969 $ (5,547) $(27,214) $ (10,462) 
1998  $( 11,436) $   475 $    111  $  2,000  $  (9,800) 
Total $(133,026) $77,900 $(11,477) $106,663  $(115,740) 

In spite of this dreadful six year performance, the Company's 
April 14, 1999 SEC Schedule 14A, revealed that the Board of 
Directors approved the payment of $1.3 million in cash bonuses to 
four Senior Executives, in addition to aggregate salaries paid of 
$873,551.  If this is the manner in which the Board rewards 
aggregate losses of $133 million, one shudders to think what would 
have been paid out if the Company had been profitable.  What is 
perhaps even more shocking is to learn that of these four Senior 
Executives, only one, R. Page Henley, SVP - Acquisitions and 
Development and Government Affairs currently owns outright any 
stock in the Company - 25,010 shares.  The other three Senior 
Executives, Christopher E. Seglem, Chairman & CEO (Salary and 
Bonus - $1,001,802); Robert J. Jaeger, SVP - Finance (Salary and 
Bonus - $477,112); and Theodore E. Worchester, SVP and General 
Counsel (Salary and Bonus - $483,181) own NO stock in the Company.

If the vastly overpaid Chairman and CEO does not have the 
confidence to invest his own money in our Company, why should the 
common shareholders have any confidence in this Chairman's ability 
to manage the affairs of the Company on our behalf?

As a shareholder, I find it unconscionable to leave in place a 
Board of Directors and Senior Management Team who have overseen 
such an appalling six year period of gross mismanagement.  
Consequently, I intend to cast my proxy for the slate of Directors 
being nominated by The Committee and urge every other shareholder 
to do likewise. 

Sincerely,



Harry J. Weitzel, Jr.




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission