CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES INC, 424B4, 1999-04-19

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES INC
424B4, 1999-04-19
PREPACKAGED SOFTWARE

Previous: CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS CORP, DEF 14A, 1999-04-19

Next: LAKEHEAD PIPELINE CO LP, 8-K/A, 1999-04-19

<PAGE> 1
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-74685

LOGO

3,100,000 SHARES

COMMON STOCK

Concur Technologies, Inc. is offering 2,018,620 shares of its common stock
and the selling stockholders are selling an additional 1,081,380 shares.
Concur's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"CNQR." The last reported sale price of the common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market on April 15, 1999 was $43.75 per share.

------------------------------

INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISK.
SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 4.

------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PER SHARE TOTAL
--------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Public offering price....................................... $43.50 $134,850,000
Underwriting discounts and commissions...................... $ 2.28 $ 7,068,000
Proceeds to Concur Technologies............................. $41.22 $ 83,207,516
Proceeds to the selling stockholders........................ $41.22 $ 44,574,483
</TABLE>

THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND STATE SECURITIES REGULATORS HAVE
NOT APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THESE SECURITIES, OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS
IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE.

Concur has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an
additional 465,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments. BancBoston
Robertson Stephens Inc. expects to deliver the shares of common stock to
purchasers on April 21, 1999.

------------------------------

BANCBOSTON ROBERTSON STEPHENS
HAMBRECHT & QUIST
U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY
VOLPE BROWN WHELAN & COMPANY
FAC/EQUITIES

THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS IS APRIL 16, 1999
<PAGE> 2

YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE
HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION DIFFERENT FROM THAT
CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. WE ARE OFFERING TO SELL, AND SEEKING OFFERS TO
BUY, SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ONLY IN JURISDICTIONS WHERE THESE OFFERS AND SALES
ARE PERMITTED. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE ONLY AS
OF THE DATE OF THIS PROSPECTUS, REGARDLESS OF THE TIME OF DELIVERY OF THIS
PROSPECTUS OR OF ANY SALE OF THE COMMON STOCK. IN THIS PROSPECTUS, REFERENCES TO
"CONCUR," "WE," "OUR" AND "US" REFER TO CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TOGETHER WITH
ITS SUBSIDIARIES.
------------------------------

TABLE OF CONTENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
----
<S> <C>
Summary..................................................... 1
Risk Factors................................................ 4
Special Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements......... 14
Use of Proceeds............................................. 15
Price Range of Common Stock................................. 16
Dividend Policy............................................. 16
Capitalization.............................................. 17
Selected Consolidated Financial Data........................ 18
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations................................. 20
Business.................................................... 37
Management.................................................. 56
Certain Transactions........................................ 67
Principal and Selling Stockholders.......................... 70
Description of Capital Stock................................ 73
Shares Eligible for Future Sale............................. 75
Underwriting................................................ 76
Legal Matters............................................... 78
Experts..................................................... 78
Where You Can Find More Information......................... 78
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-1
</TABLE>

-------------------------

We own or have rights to the product names, trade names and trademarks that
we use in conjunction with the sale of our products, including Concur(TM),
Concur Technologies(TM), Xpense Management Solution(TM), XMS(TM),
CompanyStore(TM), Employee Desktop(TM), and QuickXpense(R). This prospectus also
contains product names, trade names and trademarks that belong to other
organizations.

-------------------------

The 1997 American Express Travel and Entertainment Process Study cited in
this prospectus was not prepared with a view to, or in connection with, us or
our products or this offering. That study was prepared based on various
assumptions, facts and circumstances that may not apply to us or our products.
Accordingly, American Express and Concur cannot assure you that the conclusions
in that report are applicable to us or our products. American Express and Concur
expressly disclaim any duty to update that study, which you should note was
issued in 1997.

i
<PAGE> 3

SUMMARY

Because this is only a summary, it does not contain all the information
that may be important to you. You should read the entire prospectus, especially
"Risk Factors" and the consolidated financial statements and notes, before
deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. Unless we indicate otherwise,
all information in this prospectus assumes the underwriters will not exercise
their over-allotment option.

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

We are a leading provider of Intranet-based employee-facing software
applications that extend automation to employees throughout the enterprise and
to partners, vendors and service providers in the extended enterprise. Our
Xpense Management Solution, or XMS, and CompanyStore products automate the
preparation, approval, processing and data analysis of travel and entertainment
expense reports and front-office procurement requisitions. We recently
introduced our Employee Desktop product, which integrates XMS and CompanyStore
through a common user interface and provides a business portal through which
corporate customers and third parties can deliver other information and services
to employees. We believe we are the leading provider of travel and entertainment
expense management solutions, based on a combination of the number of customers
we serve and the features our solutions provide. Since 1996, we have licensed
products to over 175 enterprise customers for use by over 900,000 end users. By
automating manual, paper-based processes, our products reduce processing costs
and enable customers to consolidate purchases with preferred vendors and
negotiate vendor discounts.

In response to increasingly competitive conditions worldwide, businesses
are seeking cost savings and productivity gains by using enterprise applications
to automate business processes. These applications have traditionally targeted
discrete functional or department level business processes involving relatively
few employees. However, businesses are now seeking similar applications for
employee-facing business processes including travel and entertainment expense
management, front-office procurement, human resources self-service, time and
attendance, and facilities management. The emergence of the Internet and
corporate Intranets has made it possible to deploy applications that reach all
employees in the enterprise and connect the enterprise to corporate partners,
vendors and service providers. In addition, in contrast to traditional
client-server applications, Intranet-based applications can be deployed rapidly
throughout the enterprise on a cost-effective basis.

We believe our customers can achieve these cost savings rapidly because our
products are designed to minimize burdens on IT professionals and to maximize
employees' ease of use. Because our Intranet-based products are designed to
deploy rapidly, scale enterprise-wide and integrate easily with an
organization's existing IT infrastructure, a customer's IT personnel can deliver
and support solutions quickly and cost-effectively. For example, one
1
<PAGE> 4

customer deployed XMS to over 25,000 employees in less than 90 days, and has
since deployed XMS to over 50,000 employees. Employees readily adopt our
solutions because they are easy to use, reduce time spent preparing expense
reports and supply requisitions, and shorten reimbursement and fulfillment
process cycles.

Our objective is to be the leading provider of Internet-based
employee-facing applications. Our strategy is:

- to extend our leadership in travel and entertainment expense management;

- to leverage that leadership in marketing our Employee Desktop and
front-office procurement applications;

- to expand the functionality of our products;

- to add new employee-facing applications to our product suite;

- to leverage Employee Desktop to sell multiple products;

- to increase our international presence;

- to develop new relationships with strategic third-parties; and

- to offer our solutions as an outsourced enterprise service provider.

We sell our products primarily through our direct sales organization. We
also have a number of strategic referral relationships. For example, American
Express has referred corporate charge card customers seeking a travel and
entertainment expense management solution to us. American Express owns a
minority equity stake in us and is an affiliate. Automatic Data Processing, or
ADP, jointly markets our XMS product and refers potential customers to us as
well.

Given the broad applicability of our products, we have licensed
applications to numerous customers in a wide range of industries. Our customers
include:

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
AT&T Gillette Northrop Grumman
Allied Signal Guardian Industries Pfizer
American Airlines Hearst Corporation Pharmacia & Upjohn
Anheuser-Busch J.C. Penney Seagate Technology
Case Corporation Lehman Brothers Solutia
Computer Sciences Corporation Levi Strauss Sprint
Dell Computer Lucent Technologies Texaco
DuPont Monsanto Texas Instruments
Eastman Kodak Motorola Visio
Exxon The New York Times
</TABLE>

OUR ADDRESS

Our principal executive officers are located at 6222 185th Avenue NE,
Redmond, Washington 98052 and our telephone number is (425) 702-8808.
Information in our Web site is not part of this prospectus.
2
<PAGE> 5

THE OFFERING

COMMON STOCK OFFERED BY
CONCUR................... 2,018,620 shares

COMMON STOCK OFFERED BY
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS..... 1,081,380 shares

COMMON STOCK TO BE
OUTSTANDING AFTER THIS
OFFERING................. 19,120,261 shares. This is based on the actual
number of shares outstanding on February 28, 1999.
The number excludes 5,710,233 shares subject to
outstanding options or reserved for issuance under
our stock and option plans and 2,224,267 shares
subject to outstanding warrants.

USE OF PROCEEDS............ For working capital and other general corporate
purposes, including capital expenditures. See "Use
of Proceeds."

NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET
SYMBOL................... CNQR

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Our consolidated financial data reflects our acquisition of 7Software, Inc.
in June 1998 which resulted in a charge for acquired in-process technology. See
Note 3 to Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements and see the separate
financial statements of 7Software included in this prospectus. See Note 13 to
Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of the number
of shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share. The balance sheet data
at December 31, 1998, as adjusted, gives effect to our sale of 2,018,620 shares
at a public offering price of $43.50 per share, and application of the net
proceeds to us. See "Use of Proceeds" and "Capitalization."

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------- -----------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
DATA:
Revenues, net......................... $ -- $ 2,128 $ 1,959 $ 8,270 $ 17,159 $ 3,115 $ 6,005
Loss from operations.................. (602) (2,895) (4,958) (5,505) (17,760) (2,190) (5,608)
Net loss.............................. (602) (2,890) (4,953) (5,524) (18,074) (2,283) (5,642)
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss
per share.......................... $ (1.58) $ (0.21) $ (0.40)
Shares used in calculation of pro
forma basic and diluted net loss
per share.......................... 11,419 10,863 13,968
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1998
---------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED
------- -----------
<S> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents................................... $53,277 $135,785
Working capital............................................. 39,915 122,423
Total assets................................................ 62,877 145,345
Long-term obligations, net of current portion............... 7,351 7,351
Total stockholders' equity.................................. 38,329 120,837
</TABLE>

3
<PAGE> 6

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks described below before making any
investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones we face.
Additional risks that we are unaware of or that we currently believe are
immaterial may become important factors that affect our business. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and
financial condition would be materially adversely affected. In such case, the
trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or a part
of your investment.

OUR SHORT OPERATING HISTORY AND SIGNIFICANT LOSSES MAKE OUR BUSINESS DIFFICULT
TO EVALUATE.

We are still in the early stages of our development, so evaluating our
business operations and our prospects is difficult. We incorporated in 1993 and
have incurred net losses in each quarter since then. We shipped our first
product in fiscal 1995, and since fiscal 1997 have derived substantially all of
our revenues from licenses of our XMS product and related services. To compete
effectively, we expect to devote substantial cash, financial and other resources
to expanding our sales and marketing, research and development, and professional
services organizations. These investments may never produce a profit. We
incurred net losses of $5.0 million for fiscal 1996, $5.5 million for fiscal
1997, $18.1 million for fiscal 1998 and $5.6 million for the three months ended
December 31, 1998. As of December 31, 1998, we had an accumulated deficit of
$37.7 million. We expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable
future. Despite substantial net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31,
1998, tax laws may limit their use in the future upon the occurrence of certain
events, including a significant change in ownership interests. See "--Our
operating results fluctuate widely and are difficult to predict," "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

OUR OPERATING RESULTS FLUCTUATE WIDELY AND ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT.

In the past our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly,
and we expect them to continue to fluctuate in the future. Many of the factors
causing the fluctuations are listed in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Quarterly Results of Operations."
Our products are typically shipped when orders are received, so license backlog
at the beginning of any quarter in the past represented only a small portion of
that quarter's expected license revenues. This makes license revenues in any
quarter difficult to forecast because they are dependent on orders booked and
shipped in that quarter. Moreover, we typically recognize a substantial
percentage of revenues in the last month of the quarter, frequently in the last
week or even the last days of the quarter. Since our expenses are relatively
fixed in the near term, any shortfall from anticipated revenues or any delay in
the recognition of revenues could result in significant variations in operating
results from quarter to quarter. We find it difficult to forecast quarterly
license revenues because our sales cycle, from initial evaluation to delivery of
software, is lengthy and varies substantially from customer to customer. If
revenues fall below our expectations in a particular quarter, our business could
be harmed. See "--Our lengthy sales cycle could adversely affect our revenue
growth."

YEAR 2000 CONSIDERATIONS AMONG OUR CUSTOMERS AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS MAY REDUCE
OUR SALES.

We may experience reduced sales of products as customers and potential
customers put a priority on correcting Year 2000 problems and therefore defer
purchases of our

4
<PAGE> 7

products until later in 2000. Accordingly, demand for our products may be
particularly volatile and unpredictable for the remainder of 1999 and early
2000.

THE MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS IS NEWLY EMERGING AND CUSTOMERS MAY NOT ACCEPT OUR
PRODUCTS.

The market for employee-facing applications is newly emerging. Enterprises
have historically performed the processes addressed by employee-facing
applications themselves. Accordingly, our future success will depend on
companies adopting third-party employee-facing applications, particularly travel
and entertainment expense management and front-office procurement solutions. In
addition, companies that have already invested substantial resources in other
methods of implementing enterprise processes may be reluctant to adopt a new
strategy. Even if companies implement employee-facing applications, they may
still choose to design, develop or manage all or part of their process
automation internally. Thus, the use of employee-facing applications may not
increase significantly in the future, and our products or services may not
achieve commercial success. See "Business--Industry Background."

WE RELY HEAVILY ON SALES OF ONE PRODUCT.

Since 1997, we have generated substantially all of our revenues from
licenses and services related to our XMS product. We believe that XMS revenues
will continue to account for a large portion of our revenues for the foreseeable
future. Our future financial performance will depend upon the successful
development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions
of XMS and our business could be harmed if we fail to deliver the enhancements
to XMS that customers want. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

OUR EXPANSION INTO THE FRONT-OFFICE PROCUREMENT APPLICATION MARKET IS RISKY.

We also recently added the CompanyStore front-office procurement
application to our product line. To date, we have licensed CompanyStore to only
five customers. Our future revenue growth depends on our ability to license
CompanyStore to new customers and our existing base of XMS customers. Potential
and existing customers may not purchase CompanyStore for a number of reasons,
including:

- an absence of desired functionality;

- the costs of and time required for implementation;

- possible software defects; and

- a customer's lack of the necessary hardware, software or Intranet
infrastructure.

Further, we must overcome certain significant obstacles to expand into the
front-office procurement automation market, including:

- competitors that have more experience and better name recognition;

- the experience of our sales and consulting personnel in the front-office
procurement automation market is limited; and

- our reference accounts in the front-office procurement automation market
are limited.

5
<PAGE> 8

Our business could be harmed if we fail to deliver the enhancements to
CompanyStore that customers want. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

WE FACE SIGNIFICANT COMPETITION.

The market for our products is intensely competitive and rapidly changing.
Direct competition comes from independent software vendors of travel and
entertainment expense management and front-office procurement applications, and
from providers of enterprise resource planning, or ERP, software applications
that have or may be developing travel and entertainment expense management and
front-office procurement products. Many of our competitors in both the travel
and entertainment expense management and front-office procurement markets have
longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical,
marketing and other resources, significantly greater name recognition and a
larger installed base of customers than we do. Moreover, a number of our
competitors, particularly major ERP vendors, have well-established relationships
with our current and potential customers as well as with systems integrators and
other vendors and service providers. These competitors may also be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements, or to devote greater resources to the development, promotion and
sale of their products, than we can. We also face indirect competition from
potential customers' internal development efforts and have to overcome their
reluctance to move away from existing paper-based systems. See "Business--
Competition."

WE HAVE LIMITED EXPERIENCE SELLING OUR PRODUCTS AS A SUITE AND OUR EMPLOYEE
DESKTOP MODEL MAY FAIL.

We recently introduced Employee Desktop, which integrates XMS and
CompanyStore as a suite of applications. Until recently we have not sold our
products as a suite, and we do not know whether customers will prefer to buy our
products this way. In an effort to increase overall revenues, we expect to offer
our integrated suite of applications at prices that will be lower than would be
the case for the applications sold separately. This may have the effect of
reducing per-user revenues. We also expect that selling our products as a suite
will lengthen our sales cycle because the sale is more complex and is more
likely to involve information technology specialists at the prospective
customer. Because we are inexperienced selling our products this way, we cannot
predict whether it will hurt our business. See "--Our lengthy sales cycle could
adversely affect our revenue growth."

WE MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTIES IN INTRODUCING NEW PRODUCTS AND UPGRADES.

We expect to add new employee-facing applications to our product suite by
acquisition or internal development, and to develop enhancements to our existing
applications. We have experienced delays in the planned release dates of our
software products and upgrades, and we have discovered software defects in new
products after their introduction. New products or upgrades may not be released
according to schedule, or may contain defects when released. Either situation
could result in adverse publicity, loss of sales, delay in market acceptance of
our products or customer claims against us, any of which could harm our
business. If we do not develop, license or acquire new software products, or
deliver enhancements to existing products on a timely and cost-effective basis,
our business will be harmed.

6
<PAGE> 9

OUR PLAN TO SELL PRODUCTS AS AN INTERNET-BASED ENTERPRISE SERVICE PROVIDER MAY
FAIL.

In addition to licensing our software applications, we plan to offer them
as an Internet-based enterprise service provider, or ESP. We would price
solutions on a per-transaction basis or on a subscription basis to companies
seeking to outsource their employee-facing business applications. This business
model is unproven and represents a significant departure from the strategies
traditionally employed by us and other enterprise software vendors. We have no
experience selling products or services as an ESP, and our efforts to develop
this ESP business may significantly divert our revenues and management time and
attention. In connection with our planned ESP business model, we will engage
third-party service providers to perform many of the necessary services as
independent contractors, and we will be responsible for monitoring their
performance. We have limited experience outsourcing services or other important
business functions in the past, and independent contractors may not perform
those services adequately. If any service provider delivers inadequate support
or service to our customers, our reputation could be harmed. In addition, we
plan to use resellers to market ESP products. We have no experience utilizing
resellers and we may not be successful in this effort.

If customers determine that our products are not scalable, do not provide
adequate security for the dissemination of information over the Internet, or are
otherwise inadequate for Internet-based use, or if for any other reason
customers fail to accept our products for use on the Internet or on a
per-transaction or subscription basis, our business will be harmed. As an
outsourced ESP provider, we may regularly receive large amounts of confidential
information, including credit card, travel booking and other financial and
accounting data through the Internet or extranets, and there can be no assurance
that this information will not be subject to computer break-ins, theft and other
improper activity that could jeopardize the security of information for which we
are responsible. Even if our strategy of offering products to customers over the
Internet is successful, some of those Internet customers may be ones that
otherwise might have bought our software and services through our traditional
licensing arrangements. Any such shift in potential license revenues to the ESP
model, which is unproven and potentially less profitable, could harm our
business.

WE HAVE LIMITED EXPERIENCE WITH LARGE-SCALE DEPLOYMENT, WHICH IS IMPORTANT TO
OUR FUTURE SUCCESS.

To date only a limited number of customers have deployed XMS on a large
scale, and no customer has deployed CompanyStore on a large scale. We think that
the ability of large customers to roll out our products across large numbers of
users is critical to our success. If our customers cannot successfully implement
large-scale deployments, or they determine that our products cannot accommodate
large-scale deployments, our business would be harmed.

IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS.

To offer products and services to a larger customer base than we can reach
through direct sales, telesales and internal marketing efforts, we depend on
strategic referral relationships. If we were unable to maintain our existing
strategic referral relationships or enter into additional strategic referral
relationships, we would have to devote substantially more resources to the
distribution, sale and marketing of our products and services. We would also
lose anticipated customer introductions and co-marketing benefits. Our success
depends in part on the ultimate success of our strategic referral partners and
their ability to market our

7
<PAGE> 10

products and services successfully. A significant number of our new XMS sales
have come through referrals from American Express, but American Express is not
obligated to refer any potential customers to us, and it may enter into
strategic relationships with other providers of expense reporting and front
office procurement applications.

Many of our strategic partners have multiple strategic relationships, and
they may not regard us as significant for their businesses. In addition, our
strategic partners may terminate their respective relationships with us, pursue
other partnerships or relationships, or attempt to develop or acquire products
or services that compete with our products or services. Further, our existing
strategic relationships may interfere with our ability to enter into other
desirable strategic relationships. See "Business--Strategy," "--Sales,"
"--Marketing" and "--Competition."

FUTURE ACQUISITIONS MIGHT HARM OUR BUSINESS.

As part of our business strategy, we might seek to acquire or invest in
businesses, products or technologies that we feel could complement or expand our
business. If we identify an appropriate acquisition opportunity, we might not be
able to negotiate the terms of that acquisition successfully, finance it, or
integrate it into our existing business and operations. We have completed only
one acquisition to date, 7Software, Inc. We may not be able to select, manage or
absorb any future acquisitions successfully, particularly acquisitions of
companies larger than 7Software. Further, the negotiation of potential
acquisitions, as well as the integration of an acquired business, would divert
management time and other resources. We may have to use a substantial portion of
our available cash, including proceeds of this offering, to consummate an
acquisition. On the other hand, if we consummate acquisitions through an
exchange of our securities, our stockholders could suffer significant dilution.
In addition, we cannot assure you that any particular acquisition, even if
successfully completed, will ultimately benefit our business. See "--We have
broad discretion over use of proceeds" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

OUR LENGTHY SALES CYCLE COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR REVENUE GROWTH.

Because of the high costs involved, customers for enterprise software
products typically commit significant resources to an evaluation of available
software applications and require us to expend substantial time, effort and
money educating them about the value of our products and services. The time
between initial contact with a potential customer and the ultimate sale, our
sales cycle, typically ranges between six and nine months. As a result of our
lengthy sales cycle, we have only a limited ability to forecast the timing and
size of specific sales. Any delay in completing, or failure to complete, sales
in a particular quarter or fiscal year could harm our business and could cause
our operating results to vary significantly. See "--Our operating results
fluctuate widely and are difficult to predict," and "--Year 2000 considerations
among our customers and potential customers may reduce our sales."

WE DEPEND ON OUR KEY EMPLOYEES.

Our success depends on the performance of our senior management,
particularly S. Steven Singh, our President and Chief Executive Officer, who is
not bound by an employment agreement. Although we maintain key person life
insurance on Mr. Singh in the amount of $1 million, the loss of his services
would harm our business. If one or more members of our senior management or any
of our key employees were to resign, particularly to join or form a competitor,
the loss of that personnel and any resulting loss

8
<PAGE> 11

of existing or potential customers to that competitor would harm our business.
See "Business--Competition," "--Employees" and "Management."

WE MUST ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL, PARTICULARLY SERVICE PERSONNEL.

Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified,
experienced employees. There is substantial competition for experienced
engineering, sales and consulting personnel in the market segments in which we
compete. Many of our competitors for experienced personnel have greater
financial and other resources. In particular, we compete for personnel with
Microsoft Corporation, which is located in the same geographic area as our
headquarters. We also compete for personnel with other software vendors,
including ERP vendors, and with consulting and professional services companies.
In addition, our customers generally purchase consulting and implementation
services. While we have recently established relationships with some third-party
providers, we continue to be the primary provider of these consulting and
implementation services. It is difficult and expensive to recruit, train and
retain qualified personnel to perform these services, and we may from time to
time have inadequate levels of staffing to perform these services. As a result,
our growth could be limited due to our lack of capacity to provide such
services, or we could experience deterioration in service levels or decreased
customer satisfaction, any of which would harm our business. See "--We depend on
service revenues to increase our overall revenues" and "Business--Employees."

WE DEPEND ON OUR DIRECT SALES MODEL.

We sell our products primarily through our direct sales force. We believe
that there is significant competition for direct sales personnel with the
advanced sales skills and technical knowledge we need. Our inability to hire
competent sales personnel, or our failure to retain them, would harm our
business. See "--We depend on our key employees" and "--We must attract and
retain qualified personnel, particularly service personnel."

In addition, by relying primarily on a direct sales model, we may miss
sales opportunities that might be available through other sales channels, such
as domestic and international resellers. In the future, we intend to develop
indirect distribution channels through third-party distribution arrangements,
but we may not be successful in establishing those arrangements, or they may not
increase revenues. Furthermore, we plan to use resellers to market our ESP
products in particular. We have no experience utilizing resellers to date. The
failure to develop indirect channels may place us at a significant competitive
disadvantage. See "Business--Competition" and "--Sales."

WE DEPEND ON SERVICE REVENUES TO INCREASE OUR OVERALL REVENUES.

Our service revenues have increased each year as a percentage of total
revenues. Service revenues represented 12.4% of total revenues for fiscal 1996,
23.3% of total revenues for fiscal 1997, 31.8% of total revenues for fiscal 1998
and 32.6% of total revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1998. We
anticipate that service revenues will continue to represent a significant
percentage of total revenues. To a large extent, the level of service revenues
depends upon the ongoing renewals of customer support contracts by our growing
installed customer base. Customer support contracts might not be renewed. And,
if third-party organizations such as systems integrators become proficient in
installing or servicing our products, consulting revenues could decline. Our
ability to increase service revenues will depend in large part on our ability to
increase the scale of our services organization, including our ability to
successfully recruit and train a sufficient number of qualified services
personnel. See "--We depend on our key employees," "--We must

9
<PAGE> 12

attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly service personnel" and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations."

THERE ARE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.

Our international operations are subject to a number of risks, including:

- costs of customizing products for foreign countries;

- laws and business practices favoring local competition;

- dependence on local vendors;

- compliance with multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and
regulations;

- longer sales cycles;

- greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

- import and export restrictions and tariffs;

- difficulties staffing and managing foreign operations;

- multiple conflicting tax laws and regulations; and

- political and economic instability.

Our international operations also face foreign currency-related risks. To
date, most of our revenues have been denominated in U.S. Dollars, but we believe
that an increasing portion of our revenues will be denominated in foreign
currencies. In particular, we expect that an increasing portion of our
international sales may be Euro-denominated. The Euro is an untested currency
and may be subject to economic risks that are not currently contemplated. We
currently do not engage in foreign exchange hedging activities, and therefore
our international revenues and expenses are currently subject to the risks of
foreign currency fluctuations. See "--Our operating results fluctuate widely and
are difficult to predict" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations."

Revenues from customers outside the United States, primarily in the United
Kingdom, Canada and Australia, were insignificant prior to fiscal 1997, and
represented approximately $1.3 million in fiscal 1997, $810,000 in fiscal 1998
and $548,000 in the three months ended December 31, 1998. A key component to our
business strategy is to expand our sales and support operations internationally.
We employ sales professionals in London and Sydney and intend to establish
additional international sales offices, expand our international management,
sales and support organizations, and enter into relationships with additional
international remarketers. We are in the early stages of developing our indirect
distribution channels in markets outside the United States. We may not be able
to attract remarketers that will be able to market our products effectively.

We must also customize our products for local markets. For example, our
ability to expand into the European market will depend on our ability to develop
a travel and entertainment expense management solution that incorporates the tax
laws and accounting practices followed in Germany and other European countries,
and to develop employee-facing applications that support the Euro. Further, if
we establish significant operations overseas, we may incur costs that would be
difficult to reduce quickly because of employee practices in those countries.

10
<PAGE> 13

OUR PRODUCTS MIGHT NOT BE COMPATIBLE WITH ALL MAJOR PLATFORMS, WHICH COULD
INHIBIT SALES.

We must continually modify and enhance our products to keep pace with
changes in hardware and software platforms and database technology. As a result,
uncertainties related to the timing and nature of new product announcements,
introductions or modifications by vendors of operating systems, back-office
applications, and browsers and other Internet-related applications could hurt
our business. In addition, our products are not currently based upon the Java
programming language, an increasingly widely-used language for developing
Internet applications. We have made a strategic decision not to develop a fully
Java-based product at this time. Accordingly, certain features available to
products written in Java may not be available in our products, and this could
result in reduced customer demand. See "Business--Products and Technology."

WE RELY ON THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE THAT IS DIFFICULT TO REPLACE.

Some of the software we license from third parties would be difficult to
replace. This software may not continue to be available on commercially
reasonable terms, if at all. The loss or inability to maintain any of these
technology licenses could result in delays in the sale of our products and
services until equivalent technology, if available, is identified, licensed and
integrated, which could harm our business.

SOFTWARE DEFECTS OR SECURITY BREACHES COULD DIMINISH DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS.

Complex products like ours frequently contain defects or errors that may be
detected only when the product is in use. Further, we often render
implementation, consulting and other technical services, the performance of
which typically involves working with sophisticated software, computing and
networking systems, and we could fail to meet project milestones in a timely
manner or to meet customer expectations for services as a result of any such
defects or services. Our software products may be vulnerable to break-ins, theft
or other improper activity that could jeopardize the security of information for
which we are responsible. Problems caused by product defects, security breaches
or failure to meet project milestones for services could result in loss of or
delay in revenues, loss of market share, failure to achieve market acceptance,
diversion of development resources, harm to our reputation, increased insurance
costs or increased service and warranty costs. To address these problems, we may
need to expend significant capital and resources that may not have been
budgeted.

PRODUCT LIABILITY RISKS.

Because customers rely on our products for business-critical processes, any
significant defects or errors in our products or services might depress future
sales or result in tort or warranty claims. It is possible that the limitation
of liability provisions in our contracts may not be effective as a result of
existing or future federal, state or local laws or ordinances or unfavorable
judicial decisions. We have not experienced any such product liability claims to
date, but we could in the future. Further, although we maintain errors and
omissions insurance, such insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover us. A
successful product liability claim could harm our business. Just defending a
suit like this, regardless of its merits, could entail substantial expense and
require the time and attention of key management personnel.

11
<PAGE> 14

WE HAVE ONLY LIMITED PROTECTION FOR OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY AND WE MAY BE
SUBJECT TO INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS.

Someone might gain access to our proprietary technology and make
unauthorized use of it. We depend upon our proprietary technology, and rely on a
combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality
procedures and contractual provisions to protect it. We have also restricted
customer access to our source code and required all employees to enter into
confidentiality and invention assignment agreements. However, a few of our
former technical personnel did not execute such agreements, and we only recently
began requiring contractors and temporary employees to execute these agreements.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary technology, unauthorized
parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use
information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the
laws of the United States, and we expect that it will become more difficult to
monitor use of our products as we increase our international presence. In
addition, third parties may claim that our products infringe theirs. See
"Business--Intellectual Property Rights."

OUR REVENUE RECOGNITION POLICY MAY CHANGE WHEN DEFINITIVE GUIDANCE IS AVAILABLE.

We recognize revenues from sales of software licenses when we sign a
non-cancelable license agreement with a customer, the software is shipped, no
significant post-delivery vendor obligations remain and collection is deemed
probable. We recognize customer support revenues ratably over the contract term
(which is typically one year) and recognize revenues for consulting services as
such services are performed. We believe our current revenue recognition policies
and practices are consistent with applicable accounting standards. However, full
guidelines for recently introduced software revenue recognition standards have
not yet been issued. Once available, such guidance could lead to unanticipated
changes in our current revenue accounting practices, and such changes could
significantly reduce our future revenues and earnings. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Overview" and "--Results of Operations."

YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE COSTS ARE DIFFICULT TO ASSESS.

Based on our assessment to date, we believe the current versions of our
software products are capable of adequately distinguishing 21st century dates
from 20th century dates. However, our products are generally integrated into
enterprise systems involving sophisticated hardware and complex software
products, which may not be Year 2000 compliant. We may in the future be subject
to claims based on Year 2000 problems in others' products, Year 2000 problems
alleged to be found in our products, Year 2000-related issues arising from the
integration of multiple products within an overall system, or other Year
2000-related claims. In addition, earlier versions of our products were not Year
2000 compliant, and we do not intend to make them Year 2000 compliant. We also
need to ensure Year 2000 compliance of our own internal computer and other
systems, to continue testing our software products, to audit the Year 2000
compliance status of our suppliers and business partners, and to conduct a legal
audit. We have not completed our Year 2000 investigation and overall compliance
initiative, and the total cost of Year 2000 compliance may be material and may
harm our business. See "--Year 2000 considerations among our customers may
reduce our sales" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations--Year 2000 Compliance."

12
<PAGE> 15

WE HAVE BROAD DISCRETION OVER USE OF PROCEEDS.

Our management can spend most of the proceeds from this offering in ways
with which the stockholders may not agree. We cannot predict that the proceeds
will be invested to yield a favorable return. See "Use of Proceeds."

WE HAVE BEEN PUBLIC FOR ONLY A SHORT TIME AND OUR STOCK PRICE HAS BEEN VOLATILE.

We completed our initial public offering in December 1998. Prior to this
there was no trading market for our stock. The market price of our common stock
has been highly volatile and is subject to wide fluctuations. We expect our
stock price to continue to fluctuate:

- in response to quarterly variations in operating results;

- in reaction to announcements of technological innovations or new products
by us or our competitors;

- because of market conditions in the enterprise software industry; and

- in reaction to changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, and
our failure to meet or exceed the expectations of analysts or investors.

OUR EXISTING STOCKHOLDERS CONTROL A MAJORITY OF OUR STOCK.

Immediately after the closing of this offering, 54.8% of the outstanding
common stock will be owned by our directors and executive officers. As a result,
these stockholders, if acting together, would be able to control substantially
all matters requiring approval by the stockholders, including the election of
all directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In addition,
TRS holds a warrant to purchase up to 2,100,000 shares of common stock at prices
ranging from $33.75 to $85.00 that expires in three tranches through January
2002. See "Principal and Selling Stockholders" and "Certain Transactions."

OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE MAY DELAY OR PREVENT OUR ACQUISITION BY
ANOTHER COMPANY.

Our staggered Board of Directors makes a takeover less likely. Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws divide the board of directors into three
classes to serve staggered three-year terms, prohibit the stockholders from
taking action by written consent and restrict the ability of stockholders to
call special meetings. These provisions may make it more difficult for a third
party to acquire a majority of our voting stock or effect a change in control of
us. Agreements with American Express also contain provisions making it more
difficult for third parties to acquire a substantial amount of our voting stock
or effect a change in control of us. In addition, our board of directors is
authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without further
stockholder approval, that could have preference over the common stock with
respect to the payment of dividends and upon our liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up. See "Management--Executive Officers and Directors," "Description of
Capital Stock" and "Certain Transactions."

FUTURE SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including
shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and warrants, in the
public after this offering, the market price of our common stock could fall.
These sales could also impair

13
<PAGE> 16

our ability to raise capital through the sale of equity securities in the future
at a price we deem appropriate.

Upon completion of this offering, we will have outstanding approximately
19,120,261 shares of common stock, based on shares outstanding on February 28,
1999, and assuming no exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option. Of
these shares, approximately 6,961,102 are currently eligible for sale in the
public market. Approximately 11,184,835 shares of common stock are subject to
lock-up agreements between the holders of those shares and the representatives
of the underwriters, pursuant to which the holders have agreed not to offer,
sell, contract to sell or grant any option to purchase or otherwise dispose of
common stock until 90 days after the effective date of the registration
statement filed in connection with this offering. Following the expiration of
this 90-day period, substantially all of the shares subject to the lock-up
agreements will become available for immediate resale in the public market,
subject to the volume and other limitations of Rule 144. The underwriters have
informed us that they reserve the right without announcement to release shares
from the lock-up agreements prior to expiration of their terms. See "Shares
Eligible for Future Sale."

SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the information in this prospectus contains forward-looking
statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify
these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect,"
"anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue" or similar words. You should
read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our
expectations about our future performance, contain projections of our future
operating results of our future financial condition, or state other "forward-
looking" information. We believe it is important to communicate our expectations
to our investors. There may be events in the future, however, that we are not
accurately able to predict or over which we have no control. The risk factors
listed in this prospectus, as well as any other cautionary language in this
prospectus, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause
our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our
forward-looking statements. Before you invest in our common stock, you should be
aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in these risks factors
and elsewhere in this prospectus could have a material and adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and that upon the
occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our common stock could
decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

14
<PAGE> 17

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of the 2,018,620 shares we
are selling in this offering will be approximately $82.5 million, at a public
offering price of $43.50 per share, after deducting the underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses. If the underwriters'
over-allotment option is exercised in full, we estimate that our net proceeds
will be $101.7 million. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares
by the selling stockholders.

The primary purpose of this offering is to obtain additional working
capital. We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering for working capital
and other general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures. These
include increased domestic and international sales and marketing expenditures,
increased research and development expenditures and capital expenditures made in
the ordinary course of business. We may use a portion of the net proceeds for
the acquisition of or investments in businesses, products and technologies or
the establishment of joint ventures that are complementary to our current and
future business. We have no present plans, commitments or agreements with
respect to any such transactions. However, we do from time to time evaluate such
opportunities. Pending such uses, we will invest the net proceeds of this
offering in investment-grade, interest-bearing securities. See "Risk Factors--We
have broad discretion over use of proceeds" and "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital
Resources."

15
<PAGE> 18

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"CNQR." The following table sets forth the range of the high and low closing
sale prices by quarter as reported on the Nasdaq National Market since December
16, 1998, the date our common stock commenced public trading.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
HIGH LOW
FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1999: ---- -----
<S> <C> <C>
First quarter (since December 16, 1998)................ $30 1/2 $19 1/2
Second quarter......................................... $45 1/8 $25
Third quarter (through April 15, 1994)................. $55 $42
</TABLE>

On April 15, 1999, the last reported sale price for our common stock on the
Nasdaq National Market was $43.75 per share. As of February 28, 1999, there were
approximately 77 record holders of our common stock.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and
do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any future
earnings will be retained by us to develop and expand our business. Any future
determination with respect to the payment of dividends will be at the discretion
of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, operating
results, financial condition and capital requirements, the terms of
then-existing indebtedness, general business conditions and such other factors
as our board of directors deems relevant. In addition, we have credit facilities
in place that prohibit the payment of cash dividends without the lender's
consent. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources."

16
<PAGE> 19

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 1998
on an actual basis and as adjusted to reflect the receipt of the estimated net
proceeds from selling 2,018,620 shares in this offering at a public offering
price of $43.50 per share, after deducting the underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will not receive
any of the proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders in
this offering.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, 1998
-----------------------
ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED
-------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Long-term obligations, net of current portion... $ 7,351 $ 7,351
-------- ---------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share,
5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares
issued
or outstanding............................. -- --
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
60,000,000 shares authorized, 17,029,732
shares issued and outstanding, actual;
19,048,352 shares issued and outstanding,
as adjusted................................ 76,398 158,906
Deferred stock compensation..................... (384) (384)
Accumulated deficit............................. (37,685) (37,685)
-------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity................. 38,329 120,837
-------- ---------
Total capitalization..................... $ 45,680 $ 128,188
======== =========
</TABLE>

The outstanding share information set forth above excludes:

- 2,161,268 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding
under our stock option plans, at a weighted average exercise price of
$5.20 per share;

- 3,371,897 shares reserved for issuance under our 1994 Stock Option Plan,
1998 Equity Incentive Plan, 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan and 1998
Employee Stock Purchase Plan;

- 67,025 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options assumed by us
in connection with the acquisition of 7Software, at a weighted average
exercise price of $0.03 per share;

- 137,454 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants with a
weighted average exercise price of $5.73 per share; and

- 2,100,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of a warrant issued to TRS at
prices ranging from $33.75 to $85.00, expiring in three tranches through
January 2002.

See "Management--Director Compensation," "--Employee Benefit Plans,"
"Certain Transactions" and Notes 3, 9, 11 and 17 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.

17
<PAGE> 20

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto
and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of
operations data for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998, and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 1997 and 1998, are derived
from our consolidated financial statements that have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent auditors, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended
September 30, 1995 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30,
1995 and 1996 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
that are not included in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of
operations data for the year ended September 30, 1994, and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of September 30, 1994, are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements not included in this prospectus. The
consolidated statement of operations data for the three months ended December
31, 1997 and 1998 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,
1998 are derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited consolidated financial statements
reflect all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of our management,
are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position at December 31,
1998 and for the three month periods ended December 31, 1997 and 1998. The
results of operations for the three month period ended December 31, 1998 are not
necessarily indicative of future results. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Quarterly Results of
Operations."

Our consolidated financial data reflects our acquisition of 7Software in
June 1998 which resulted in a charge for acquired in-process technology. See
Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and see the separate
financial statements of 7Software included in this prospectus. See Note 13 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statement for an explanation of the number of
shares used in computing pro forma net loss per share.

18
<PAGE> 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS DATA
Revenues, net:
Licenses..................... $ -- $ 2,104 $ 1,717 $ 6,347 $ 11,696 $ 2,036 $ 4,045
Services..................... -- 24 242 1,923 5,463 1,079 1,960
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total revenues......... -- 2,128 1,959 8,270 17,159 3,115 6,005
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Cost of revenues:
Licenses..................... -- 728 386 394 558 82 224
Services..................... -- 673 839 2,269 5,684 1,097 2,453
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total cost of
revenues............. -- 1,401 1,225 2,663 6,242 1,179 2,677
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Gross profit................... -- 727 734 5,607 10,917 1,936 3,328
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.......... 111 2,363 2,936 5,896 12,353 2,206 4,687
Research and development..... 425 744 1,793 3,401 6,434 1,083 2,612
General and administrative... 66 515 963 1,815 4,687 837 1,637
Acquired in-process
technology................. -- -- -- -- 5,203 -- --
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total operating
expenses............. 602 3,622 5,692 11,112 28,677 4,126 8,936
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Loss from operations........... (602) (2,895) (4,958) (5,505) (17,760) (2,190) (5,608)
Other income (expense), net.... -- 5 5 (19) (314) (93) (34)
----- ------- ------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Net loss....................... $(602) $(2,890) $(4,953) $(5,524) $(18,074) $(2,283) $(5,642)
===== ======= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Pro forma basic and diluted net
loss per share (unaudited)... $ (1.58) $ (0.21) $ (0.40)
======== ======= =======
Shares used in calculation of
pro forma basic and diluted
net loss per share
(unaudited).................. 11,419 10,863 13,968
======== ======= =======
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, 1998
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED
----- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------------ -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
Cash and cash equivalents......... $ 277 $ 2,541 $ 5,685 $ 6,695 $ 15,629 $53,277 $135,785
Working capital (deficit)......... (175) 1,839 4,073 6,183 8,474 39,915 122,423
Total assets...................... 345 3,058 6,759 12,364 25,031 62,877 145,385
Long-term obligations, net of
current portion................. 233 125 215 3,687 8,092 7,351 7,351
Redeemable convertible preferred
stock and warrants.............. -- 4,903 12,386 17,345 30,129 -- --
Total stockholders' equity
(deficit)....................... (353) (3,234) (8,186) (13,710) (26,219) 38,329 120,837
</TABLE>

19
<PAGE> 22

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this
prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus.

OVERVIEW

We were incorporated in 1993 and commenced operations in fiscal 1994,
initially developing QuickXpense, a retail, shrink-wrapped application that
automated travel and entertainment expense reporting for individuals. We first
shipped QuickXpense in fiscal 1995 and sold QuickXpense through a combination of
retail channels and direct marketing, utilizing a small sales force and no
consulting or implementation staff. In response to inquiries from businesses
seeking to automate the entire travel and entertainment expense reporting
process, including back-office processing and integration to financial systems,
we significantly expanded our product development efforts and released XMS, a
client-server based enterprise travel and entertainment expense management
solution in July 1996. In March 1998, we shipped an Intranet-based version of
XMS. While we continue to sell the client-server version of XMS, since its
release the Intranet-based version has accounted for a majority of XMS license
revenues. We expect to continue to focus product development efforts on the
Intranet-based versions of our products.

On June 30, 1998, we acquired 7Software, a privately-held software company
and the developer of CompanyStore. 7Software was incorporated in May 1997.
7Software was selling the initial version of its product through a single sales
representative at the time we acquired it. In connection with the acquisition,
we issued 708,918 shares of our common stock in exchange for all the outstanding
shares of 7Software. We also converted all of 7Software's outstanding options
into options to purchase up to 123,921 shares of our common stock, paid $130,000
to 7Software, and agreed to pay $500,000 to certain shareholders of 7Software.
Our total purchase price was valued at $6.2 million, including direct costs of
the acquisition. The total purchase price was determined by our management and
board of directors based on an assessment of the value of 7Software and as a
result of negotiations with 7Software. In determining the purchase price, we
estimated the fair value of our common stock and our stock options issued in the
transaction. We

20
<PAGE> 23

also entered into employment and bonus agreements with certain officers of
7Software. The acquisition was recorded under the purchase method of accounting
and the results of operations of 7Software and the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed were included in our consolidated financial
statements beginning on the acquisition date. In connection with this
acquisition, we recorded $5.2 million for in-process technology as an expense in
the quarter ended June 30, 1998. In addition, we recorded capitalized technology
and other intangible assets of $960,000 that will be amortized on a
straight-line basis over the three years following the acquisition. See
"--Acquisition of 7Software" and Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

In January 1999 we introduced Employee Desktop, which provides a common
user interface and a common technology platform to integrate our current
products and future applications. We plan to offer our products as an
Internet-based enterprise service provider on a per-transaction or subscription
basis to companies seeking to outsource their employee-facing business
applications.

We expect that for the foreseeable future the significant majority of our
revenues will continue to be derived from our XMS product line and related
services. Our revenues, which consist of software license revenues and service
revenues, totaled $2.0 million, $8.3 million and $17.2 million in fiscal 1996,
1997 and 1998, respectively, and $6.0 million in the three months ended December
31, 1998. Through June 1996, our revenues were derived from licenses of
QuickXpense and related services. In July 1996, we released XMS. Substantially
all of our revenues since the fourth quarter of fiscal 1996 have been derived
from licenses of XMS and related services. Our product pricing is based on the
number of users or employees of the purchasing enterprise. Service revenues
consist of consulting, customer support and training. See "Risk Factors--Our
short operating history and significant losses make our business difficult to
evaluate," "--Our operating results fluctuate widely and are difficult to
predict" and "--We rely heavily on sales of one product."

We market our software and services primarily through our direct sales
organization in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia.
Revenues from XMS licenses and services to customers outside the United States
were insignificant prior to fiscal 1997, and represented approximately $1.3
million and $810,000 in fiscal 1997 and 1998, respectively, and $548,000 in the
three months ended December 31, 1998. Historically, as a result of the
relatively small amount of international sales, fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates have not had a material effect on our business. See "Risk
Factors--There are risks associated with international operations" and Note 15
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

For fiscal 1998 and prior years, we recognized revenues in accordance with
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
91-1. Software license revenues are recognized when a non-cancelable license
agreement has been signed with a customer, the software is shipped, no
significant post delivery vendor obligations remain and collection is deemed
probable. Maintenance revenues are recognized ratably over the contract term,
typically one year. Revenues for consulting services are recognized as such
services are performed. Commencing with fiscal 1999, we recognize revenues in
accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement
of Position 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition," or SOP 97-2. SOP 97-2 has been
subject to certain modifications and interpretations since its release in
October 1997. Most recently in December 1998, the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position 98-9, "Modification of
SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition,

21
<PAGE> 24

With Respect to Certain Transactions" which has been adopted by us without any
significant effect on revenue recognition. Further implementation guidelines
relating to SOP 97-2 and related modifications may result in unanticipated
changes in our revenue recognition practices and such changes could affect our
future revenues and earnings.

Since inception, we have incurred substantial research and development
costs and have invested heavily in the expansion of our sales, marketing and
professional services organizations to build an infrastructure to support our
long-term growth strategy. The number of our full-time employees increased from
135 as of December 31, 1997, to 251 as of December 31, 1998, representing an
increase of 86%. As a result of investments in our infrastructure, we have
incurred net losses in each fiscal quarter since inception and, as of December
31, 1998, had an accumulated deficit of $37.7 million. We anticipate that our
operating expenses will increase substantially for the foreseeable future as we
expand our product development, sales and marketing and professional services
staff. In addition, we expect to incur substantial expenses associated with
sales personnel, referral fees and marketing programs in future periods as a
result of our joint marketing agreements with TRS and ADP. Accordingly, we
expect to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.

We have recorded aggregate deferred stock compensation of $861,000.
Deferred stock compensation is amortized over the life of the options, generally
four years. During fiscal 1998, we recorded amortization of deferred stock
compensation of $409,000 and during the first quarter of fiscal 1999, we
recorded amortization of deferred stock compensation of $68,000.

We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are
not meaningful and should not be relied upon as indicative of future
performance. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses
and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in early stages of
development, particularly companies in new and rapidly evolving markets. There
can be no assurance we will be successful in addressing such risks and
difficulties. In addition, although we have experienced significant revenue
growth recently, this trend may not continue. In addition, we may not achieve or
maintain profitability in the future. See "Risk Factors--Our short operating
history and significant losses make our business difficult to evaluate" and
"--Our operating results fluctuate widely and are difficult to predict."

22
<PAGE> 25

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a
percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- --------------
1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues, net:
Licenses.......................... 87.6% 76.7% 68.2% 65.4% 67.4%
Services.......................... 12.4 23.3 31.8 34.6 32.6
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total revenues............ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Cost of revenues:
Licenses.......................... 19.7 4.8 3.3 2.6 3.7
Services.......................... 42.8 27.4 33.1 35.3 40.9
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total cost of revenues.... 62.5 32.2 36.4 37.9 44.6
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Gross margin........................ 37.5 67.8 63.6 62.1 55.4
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing............... 149.9 71.3 72.0 70.8 78.0
Research and development.......... 91.5 41.1 37.5 34.8 43.5
General and administrative........ 49.2 21.9 27.3 26.9 27.3
Acquired in-process technology.... -- -- 30.3 -- --
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Total operating
expenses............... 290.6 134.3 167.1 132.5 148.8
Loss from operations................ (253.1) (66.5) (103.5) (70.4) (93.4)
Other income (expense), net......... 0.3 (0.2) (1.9) (2.9) (0.6)
------ ----- ------ ----- -----
Net loss............................ (252.8)% (66.7)% (105.4)% (73.3)% (94.0)%
====== ===== ====== ===== =====
</TABLE>

THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997

Revenues

Our revenues are derived from software licenses and related services. Our
revenues were $3.1 million and $6.0 million for the three months ended December
31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase of $2.9 million, or
93%. International revenues were $186,000 and $548,000 for the three months
ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively.

Our license revenues were $2.0 million and $4.0 million for the three
months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase
of $2.0 million, or 99%. License revenues represented 65.4% and 67.4% of total
revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively.
This increase consisted of increased sales of XMS, reflecting the increased
market acceptance of XMS, an increase in the size and productivity of the sales
force, and the sales related to referrals attributable to our December 1997
strategic marketing alliance agreement with American Express.

Our service revenues were $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the three
months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase
of $881,000, or 82%. Service revenues consist primarily of consulting and
implementation service fees, maintenance and, to a lesser extent, training
services, associated with the increase in licenses of XMS during these periods.
Service revenues represented 34.6% and 32.6% of total revenues for the three
months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The

23
<PAGE> 26

increase in service revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1998 over
the three months ended December 31, 1997 reflected increased licenses of XMS in
fiscal 1999 as well as revenues recognized with respect to licenses entered into
in prior periods. We believe that the percentage of total revenues represented
by service revenues in prior fiscal periods is not indicative of levels to be
expected in future periods. Due to our limited experience selling CompanyStore,
we are uncertain how recognition of service revenues associated with such sales
will affect our results of operations in the future. In addition, we expect that
the proportion of our service revenues to total revenues will fluctuate in the
future, depending in part on our use of third-party consulting and
implementation service providers as well as market acceptance of our outsourced
enterprise service provider, or ESP, solution.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues includes license fees
for sub-licensing third-party software, product media, product duplication,
manuals and amortization of capitalized technology and other intangible assets.
Our cost of license revenues was $82,000 and $224,000 for the three months ended
December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase of $142,000,
or 173%. This increase was principally a result of the amortization of
capitalized technology and other intangible assets recorded in connection with
the June 1998 acquisition of 7Software, increased expenses associated with
sub-licensing of third-party software due to increased sales of XMS, and the
costs of production, manuals and other media associated with the November 1998
release of XMS 4.0. Cost of license revenues represented 4.0% and 5.5% of
license revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998,
respectively. We expect that the cost of license revenues may increase
significantly as a percentage of total revenues and as a percentage of license
revenues upon the introduction of our outsourced ESP solution and will fluctuate
in the future depending in part on the demand for our current products and our
outsourced ESP solution.

Cost of Service Revenues. Cost of service revenues includes personnel and
other costs related to consulting services, technical support, training and
warranty reserves. Our cost of service revenues was $1.1 million and $2.5
million for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively,
representing an increase of $1.4 million, or 124%. This increase was primarily
due to an increase in professional service support personnel to manage and
support our growing customer base. Consulting services personnel increased from
21 as of December 31, 1997 to 47 as of December 31, 1998, representing an
increase of 26, or 124%. Cost of service revenues was 102% and 125% of service
revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively.
Cost of service revenues as a percentage of service revenues may vary between
periods due to the mix of services provided by us and the resources used to
provide such services.

Costs and Expenses

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of
salaries, commissions and bonuses earned by sales and marketing personnel, lead
referral fees, travel and entertainment and promotional expenses. Our sales and
marketing expenses were $2.2 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended
December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase of $2.5
million, or 113%. This increase primarily reflects our investment in our sales
and marketing infrastructure, which included significant personnel-related costs
to recruit and hire sales management, sales representatives and sales engineers,
trade show expenses, and sales referral fees under our agreements

24
<PAGE> 27

with our referral partners, principally American Express. Sales and marketing
employees increased from 43 as of December 31, 1997 to 79 as of December 31,
1998, representing an increase of 36, or 84%. Sales and marketing expenses
represented 70.8% and 78.1% of total revenues for the three months ended
December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. We believe that a significant increase
in our sales and marketing efforts is essential for us to maintain our market
position and further increase acceptance of our products. Accordingly, we
anticipate we will continue to invest significantly in sales and marketing for
the foreseeable future, and sales and marketing expenses will increase in future
periods.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist
primarily of salaries and benefits for software developers, product managers and
quality assurance personnel and payments to outside contractors. Our research
and development expenses were $1.1 million and $2.6 million for the three months
ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase of $1.5
million, or 141%. This increase was primarily related to the increase in
software developers, program management and documentation personnel and outside
contractors to support our product development of XMS, CompanyStore, and
Employee Desktop. Our research and development employees increased from 40 as of
December 31, 1997 to 69 as of December 31, 1998, representing an increase of 29,
or 73%. Research and development costs represented 34.8% and 43.5% of total
revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively. We
believe that a significant increase in our research and development investment
is essential for us to maintain our market position, to continue to expand our
product line and to enhance the common technology platform for our suite of
products. Accordingly, we anticipate that we will continue to invest
significantly in product research and development for the foreseeable future,
and research and development expenses are likely to increase in future periods.
In the development of our new products and enhancements of existing products,
the technological feasibility of the software is not established until
substantially all product development is complete. Historically, software
development costs eligible for capitalization have been insignificant, and all
costs related to internal research and development have been expensed as
incurred.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist
primarily of salaries, benefits and related costs for our executive, finance,
administrative, business development and information services personnel. Our
general and administrative expenses were $837,000 and $1.6 million for the three
months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an increase
of $800,000, or 96%. This increase was primarily the result of additional
finance, executive, information services and human resources personnel to
support the growth of our business, an increase of outside contractors expense
associated with increased recruiting efforts and expanded human resources
programs, and an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts related to our
increase in revenues. General and administrative costs represented 26.9% and
27.3% of our total revenues for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and
1998, respectively. We believe that our general and administrative expenses will
continue to increase as a result of the continued expansion of our
administrative staff and expenses associated with being a public company,
including annual and other public reporting costs, directors' and officers'
liability insurance, investor relations programs and professional services fees.

Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest income was $54,000 and
$225,000 for the three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively,
representing an increase of $171,000, or 317%. This increase reflects the higher
cash and short-term investment base as a result of proceeds we received in
December 1998 from our initial public offering of our common stock. Interest
expense was $135,000 and $222,000 for the

25
<PAGE> 28

three months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing an
increase of $87,000, or 64%. This increase was due to additional bank borrowings
and higher capital lease obligations during the three months ended December 31,
1998.

Provision for Income Taxes. No provision for federal and state income taxes
has been recorded because we have experienced net losses since inception which
has resulted in deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance has been recorded for
the entire deferred tax asset as a result of uncertainties regarding the
realization of the asset balance.

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, 1997 AND 1996

Revenues

Our revenues were $2.0 million, $8.3 million and $17.2 million in fiscal
1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing increases of $6.3 million, or
322%, from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 and $8.9 million, or 107%, from fiscal
1997 to fiscal 1998. We had no customer that accounted for more than 10% of our
revenues in fiscal 1996, 1997 or 1998.

Our license revenues were $1.7 million, $6.3 million and $11.7 million in
fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing increases of $4.6
million, or 271%, from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 and $5.4 million, or 84%, from
fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. The increase in our license revenues from fiscal
1996 to fiscal 1997 was due to increased market acceptance of the client-server
version of XMS and increases in both the size and productivity of the sales
force. The increase in license revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 was a
result of the continued impact of those same factors, as well as the release of
the Intranet version of XMS, and the strategic marketing alliance agreement
signed with American Express in December 1997. Virtually none of the increase in
revenues was attributable to increased prices.

Our service revenues were $242,000, $1.9 million and $5.5 million in fiscal
1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing increases of $1.7 million from
fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 and $3.5 million, or 184%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal
1998. Prior to fiscal 1997, service revenues consisted primarily of customizing
electronic versions of expense report forms in connection with sales of
QuickXpense. In fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1998, service revenues consisted
primarily of consulting service fees, customer support and, to a lesser extent,
training services, associated with the increasing license revenues during these
periods. Service revenues represented 12.4%, 23.3% and 31.8% of our total
revenues in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The increase in absolute
service revenues from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 reflects increasing licenses of
XMS as well as service revenues recognized with respect to licenses entered into
in prior periods.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of License Revenues. Cost of license revenues was $386,000, $394,000
and $558,000 in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing increases
of $8,000, or 2%, from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 and $164,000, or 42%, from
fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. Cost of license revenues remained relatively
constant from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 as a result of a shift in the mix of
revenues from QuickXpense and XMS. The increase from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998
was a result of increased expenses associated with sub-licensing of third party
software due to increased sales of XMS and the costs of production, manuals and
other media associated with the release of the Intranet version of XMS in March
1998. Cost of license revenues as a percentage of license revenues was 22.5%,
6.2% and 4.8% for fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. A portion of the
capitalized technology

26
<PAGE> 29

and other intangible assets recorded in connection with the acquisition of
7Software will be amortized on a straight-line basis over three years as cost of
license revenues.

Cost of Service Revenues. Cost of service revenues was $839,000, $2.3
million and $5.7 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively,
representing increases of $1.4 million, or 170%, from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997
and $3.4 million, or 151%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. The increase from
fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997 was a result of hiring and training a consulting
organization to implement XMS and retraining existing personnel, in connection
with the shift in our product line from QuickXpense to XMS. The increase from
1997 to 1998 was primarily due to an increase in professional services personnel
to support our growing XMS customer base. Cost of service revenues as a
percentage of service revenues was 346.7%, 118.0% and 104.1% for fiscal 1996,
1997 and 1998, respectively. The decrease in cost of service revenues as a
percentage of service revenues from fiscal 1996 through fiscal 1998 was
primarily due to economies of scale realized as a result of higher levels of
consulting services activity and increased experience of the professional
services personnel.

Costs and Expenses

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $2.9 million, $5.9
million and $12.4 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively,
representing increases of $3.0 million, or 101%, from fiscal 1996 to fiscal 1997
and $6.5 million, or 110%, from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. The increases from
fiscal 1996 through fiscal 1998 primarily reflect our investment in our sales
and marketing infrastructure, which included significant personnel-related
expenses such as salaries, benefits and commissions, recruiting fees, travel and
entertainment expenses, and related costs of hiring sales management, sales
representatives, sales engineers and marketing personnel. Sales and marketing
employees totaled 21, 42 and 66 as of September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998,
respectively, representing increases of 100% and 57%, respectively. The increase
in sales and marketing expenses from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998 also reflected
increased hiring rates to replace and support promoted regional sales managers,
public relations and trade show expenses, and sales referral fees made under our
agreement with our referral partners, principally American Express. Sales and
marketing expenses represented 149.9%, 71.3% and 72.0% of our total revenues for
fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively. The decreases in sales and marketing
expenses as a percentage of total revenues from fiscal 1996 through 1998
primarily reflects the more rapid growth of revenues compared to the growth of
sales and marketing expenses in this period due to the increase in service
revenues as a percentage of total revenues and a maturing sales force.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses were $1.8
million, $3.4 million and $6.4 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998,
respectively, representing increases of $1.6 million, or 90%, from fiscal 1996
to fiscal 1997 and $3.0 million, or 89% from fiscal 1997 to fiscal 1998. The
increases from fiscal 1996 through fiscal 1998 were primarily related to the
increase in the number of software developers and quality assurance personnel
and outside contractors to support our product development and testing
activities related to the development and release of both the client-server and
Intranet versions of XMS. Our research and development employees totaled 22, 38
and 64 as of September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, representing
increases of 73% and 68%, respectively. Research and development costs
represented 91.5%, 41.1% and 37.5% of our total revenues in fiscal 1996, 1997
and 1998, respectively.

27
<PAGE> 30

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were
$963,000, $1.8 million and $4.7 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998,
respectively, representing increases of $852,000, or 88%, from fiscal 1996 to
1997 and $2.9 million, or 158%, from fiscal 1997 to 1998. The increases from
fiscal 1996 through 1998 were primarily the result of additional finance,
executive and administrative personnel to support the growth of our business
during these periods. In addition to increased compensation and related
expenses, the increase in general and administrative expenses from fiscal 1997
to fiscal 1998 reflects an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts
related to our increase in revenues, and stock compensation expense, during the
period. During fiscal 1998, we recorded deferred stock compensation for the
differences between the exercise prices and the deemed fair values of our common
stock with respect to certain options, and recorded amortization of deferred
stock compensation of $409,000. General and administrative costs represented
49.2%, 21.9% and 27.3% of our total revenues in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998,
respectively.

Income Taxes. As of September 30, 1998, we had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal and state income tax reporting purposes of
approximately $19.1 million and tax credit carryforwards of $262,000, which
expire at various dates from 2009 to 2013. The U.S. tax laws contain provisions
that limit the use in any future period of net operating loss and credit
carryforwards upon the occurrence of certain events, including a significant
change in ownership interests. We had deferred tax assets, including our net
operating loss carryforwards and tax credits, totaling approximately $8.8
million as of September 30, 1998. A valuation allowance has been recorded for
the entire deferred tax asset as a result of uncertainties regarding the
realization of the asset balance. See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.

28
<PAGE> 31

QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth unaudited consolidated statement of
operations data for the nine quarters in the 27-month period ended December 31,
1998, as well as such data expressed as a percentage of our total revenues for
the periods indicated. This data has been derived from our unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements that have been prepared on the same basis as
the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, in the opinion of our
management, include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of the information when read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Our quarterly
results have been in the past and may in the future be subject to significant
fluctuations. As a result, we believe that results of operations for interim
periods should not be relied upon as any indication of the results to be
expected in any future period. See "Risk Factors--Our operating results
fluctuate widely and are difficult to predict."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31, MARCH 31,
1996 1997 1997 1997 1997 1998
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Revenues, net:
Licenses........................ $ 923 $ 1,335 $ 1,829 $ 2,260 $ 2,036 $ 2,818
Services........................ 218 336 564 805 1,079 1,141
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues................ 1,141 1,671 2,393 3,065 3,115 3,959
Cost of revenues:
Licenses........................ 40 80 99 175 82 90
Services........................ 317 468 585 899 1,097 1,115
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total cost of revenues........ 357 548 684 1,074 1,179 1,205
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross profit..................... 784 1,123 1,709 1,991 1,936 2,754
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing............. 1,061 1,378 1,434 2,023 2,206 2,400
Research and development........ 603 787 836 1,175 1,083 1,195
General and administrative...... 322 450 440 603 837 836
Acquired in-process
technology.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses...... 1,986 2,615 2,710 3,801 4,126 4,431
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from operations............. (1,202) (1,492) (1,001) (1,810) (2,190) (1,677)
Other income (expense), net...... 17 11 (14) (33) (93) (103)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss......................... $(1,185) $(1,481) $(1,015) $(1,843) $(2,283) $(1,780)
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL REVENUES
Revenues, net:
Licenses........................ 80.9% 79.9% 76.4% 73.7% 65.4% 71.2%
Services........................ 19.1 20.1 23.6 26.3 34.6 28.8
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues................ 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cost of revenues:
Licenses........................ 3.5 4.8 4.1 5.7 2.6 2.3
Services........................ 27.8 28.0 24.4 29.3 35.3 28.2
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total cost of revenues........ 31.3 32.8 28.5 35.0 37.9 30.5
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Gross margin..................... 68.7 67.2 71.5 65.0 62.1 69.5
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing............. 93.0 82.4 59.9 66.0 70.8 60.6
Research and development........ 52.8 47.1 34.9 38.3 34.8 30.2
General and administrative...... 28.2 26.9 18.4 19.7 26.9 21.1
Acquired in-process
technology.................... -- -- -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses...... 174.0 156.4 113.2 124.0 132.5 111.9
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Loss from operations............. (105.3) (89.2) (41.7) (59.0) (70.4) (42.4)
Other income (expense), net...... 1.4 0.7 (0.6) (1.1) (2.9) (2.6)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net loss......................... (103.9)% (88.5)% (42.3)% (60.1)% (73.3)% (45.0)%
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======

<CAPTION>
QUARTER ENDED
---------------------------------------------
JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1998 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Revenues, net:
Licenses........................ $ 3,185 $ 3,657 $ 4,045
Services........................ 1,456 1,787 1,960
------- ------- -------
Total revenues................ 4,641 5,444 6,005
Cost of revenues:
Licenses........................ 146 240 224
Services........................ 1,490 1,982 2,453
------- ------- -------
Total cost of revenues........ 1,636 2,222 2,677
------- ------- -------
Gross profit..................... 3,005 3,222 3,328
------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing............. 3,280 4,467 4,687
Research and development........ 1,884 2,272 2,612
General and administrative...... 1,552 1,462 1,637
Acquired in-process
technology.................... 5,203 -- --
------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses...... 11,919 8,201 8,936
------- ------- -------
Loss from operations............. (8,914) (4,979) (5,608)
Other income (expense), net...... (118) -- (34)
------- ------- -------
Net loss......................... $(9,032) $(4,979) $(5,642)
======= ======= =======
AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL REVENUES
Revenues, net:
Licenses........................ 68.6% 67.2% 67.4%
Services........................ 31.4 32.8 32.6
------- ------- -------
Total revenues................ 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cost of revenues:
Licenses........................ 3.1 4.4 3.7
Services........................ 32.1 36.4 40.9
------- ------- -------
Total cost of revenues........ 35.2 40.8 44.6
------- ------- -------
Gross margin..................... 64.8 59.2 55.4
------- ------- -------
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing............. 70.6 82.0 78.0
Research and development........ 40.6 41.7 43.5
General and administrative...... 33.4 26.9 27.3
Acquired in-process
technology.................... 112.1 -- --
------- ------- -------
Total operating expenses...... 256.7 150.6 148.8
------- ------- -------
Loss from operations............. (191.9) (91.4) (93.4)
Other income (expense), net...... (2.5) -- (0.6)
------- ------- -------
Net loss......................... (194.4)% (91.4)% (94.0)%
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

29
<PAGE> 32

The trends discussed in the annual comparisons of operating results from
fiscal 1996 through the first quarter of fiscal 1999 apply generally to the
comparison of results of operations for the nine quarters ended December 31,
1998. Our operating expenses for the three month period ended June 30, 1998
exceeded levels that we experienced historically, due in part to acquired
in-process technology expense recorded in connection with the acquisition of
7Software. In addition, operating expenses for the three month periods ended
June 30, September 30 and December 31, 1998 increased significantly as a result
of:

- higher personnel costs;

- higher travel and entertainment expenses;

- increased use of independent contractors and other outside services for
continued product development activities;

- higher recruiting and related hiring expenses for additional senior
management; and

- amortization of deferred stock compensation.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past,
and will continue to fluctuate in the future, as a result of a number of
factors, many of which are outside our control. These factors include:

- demand for our products and services;

- size and timing of specific sales;

- delays in customer orders due to customers' Year 2000 priorities;

- level of product and price competition;

- timing and market acceptance of new product introductions and product
enhancements by us and our competitors;

- delays in our new product introductions and enhancements;

- changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors;

- our ability to hire, train and retain sales and consulting personnel;

- the length of our sales cycle;

- our ability to establish and maintain relationships with third-party
implementation services providers and strategic partners;

- the mix of products and services sold, including an anticipated shift to
providing our solutions as an ESP;

- mix of distribution channels through which products are sold;

- changes in our sales force incentives;

- software defects and other product quality problems;

- personnel changes;

- changes in our strategy, including the anticipated development of an ESP
strategy; and

- budgeting cycles of our customers.

We have in the past experienced delays in the planned release dates of our
new software products or upgrades, and have discovered software defects in our
new products

30
<PAGE> 33

after their introduction. Our new products or upgrades may not be released
according to schedule, or when released may contain defects. Either of these
situations could result in adverse publicity, loss of revenues, delay in market
acceptance or claims by customers brought against us, any of which could harm
our business. In addition, the timing of individual sales has been difficult for
us to predict, and large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in
quarters subsequent to those anticipated by us. The loss or deferral of one or
more significant sales may harm our quarterly operating results.

Our license revenues in the first quarter of fiscal 1998 were lower than
those of the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997. Although first quarter 1999 license
revenues were higher than those for the fourth quarter of 1998, in future
periods, we expect that seasonal trends may cause first quarter revenues to be
lower than the level achieved in the preceding fourth quarter.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through sales of
equity securities and to a lesser degree the use of long-term debt and equipment
leases. In December 1998, we completed our initial public offering of common
stock and received approximately $37.4 million in cash, net of underwriting
discounts, commissions and other offering costs. Prior to our initial public
offering, we had raised approximately $29.7 million, net of offering costs from
the issuance of preferred stock, and approximately $8.0 million from the
issuance of long-term debt, and had financed equipment purchases totaling
approximately $3.6 million. Our sources of liquidity as of December 31, 1998
consisted principally of cash and cash equivalents of $53.3 million, and
approximately $1.5 million of available borrowings under a line of credit.

Net cash used in operating activities was $4.1 million, $6.6 million and
$8.5 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, and $1.9 million in
the three months ended December 31, 1998. For such periods, net cash used by
operating activities was primarily a result of funding ongoing operations.

Since 1995, our investing activities have consisted of purchases of
property and equipment. Capital expenditures, including those under capital
leases, totaled $420,000, $1.0 million and $1.6 million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and
1998, respectively, and $378,000 in the three months ended December 31, 1998. We
finance the acquisition of property and equipment, primarily computer hardware
and software for our increasing employee base as well as for our management
information systems, primarily through capital leases. We anticipate that we
will experience an increase in our capital expenditures and lease commitments
consistent with our anticipated growth in operations, infrastructure and
personnel. We do not expect to incur significant costs to make our products or
internal information systems Year 2000 compliant because we believe such
products and information systems are designed to function properly through and
beyond the year 2000. See "Risk Factors--Year 2000 considerations among our
customers and potential customers may reduce our sales" and "--Year 2000
compliance costs are difficult to assess."

Our financing activities provided $7.7 million, $8.6 million and $17.6
million in fiscal 1996, 1997 and 1998, respectively, and $39.6 million in the
three months ended December 31, 1998. In fiscal 1996, cash provided by financing
activities consisted primarily of $7.5 million received in connection with the
sale of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock and $563,000 in proceeds
from long-term debt borrowings, partially offset by principal payments on
long-term debt totaling $380,000. In fiscal 1997, cash provided by financing
activities consisted primarily of $4.6 million received in connection with the

31
<PAGE> 34

sale of Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock, $3.1 million in
proceeds from long-term debt, and $1.9 million in proceeds from sales leaseback
transactions and capital lease financing, offset in part by principal payments
on long-term debt of $925,000. In fiscal 1998, cash provided by financing
activities consisted primarily of $12.7 million received in connection with the
sale of Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock and $5.5 million in
proceeds from long-term borrowings, offset by $335,000 in principal payments on
long-term debt and $500,000 in payments on capital lease obligations. In the
three months ended December 31, 1998, cash provided by financing activities
consisted primarily of $37.4 million from our initial public offering of common
stock and $2.6 million from the exercise of warrants offset in part by principal
payments on long-term debt of $155,000 and payments on capital lease obligations
of $237,000.

As of December 31, 1998, we had a line of credit with a bank for $2.0
million, which bearing interest at the lending bank's prime rate plus 1.5%.
Borrowings were limited to the lesser of 80% of eligible accounts receivable or
$2.0 million and were secured by substantially all of our non-leased assets. As
of December 31, 1998, we had not borrowed under the line of credit; however,
there were approximately $500,000 in standby letters of credit outstanding. We
could borrow approximately $1.5 million under this line as of December 31, 1998.
This credit facility was amended in March 1999 to increase the borrowing amount
to $4.0 million and to extend the expiration date to March 2000, and is
otherwise on substantially the same terms.

In September 1997, we entered into a $1.0 million senior term loan facility
with the same bank with which we have the line of credit, pursuant to the terms
of a security and loan agreement. In April 1998, the loan agreement was amended
to allow for additional borrowings up to a total of $3.0 million. The facility,
which bears interest at the lending bank's prime rate less 1.0%, matures on
February 15, 2001. Payments were interest only through February 15, 1999, at
which time we started to pay off the facility in 24 equal monthly principal
payments plus interest. The loan agreement contains certain financial
restrictions and covenants, with which we are currently in compliance. As of
December 31, 1998, the outstanding indebtedness under the loan agreement was
$3.0 million.

In July 1997, we entered into a subordinated loan and security agreement
with an equipment lessor in the principal amount of $1.5 million which bears
interest at an annual rate of 8.5%. In May 1998, the subordinated loan agreement
was amended to allow for additional borrowings of $5.0 million bearing interest
at an annual rate of 11% on the first $3.5 million and 12.5% on the remaining
$1.5 million, which expired on December 31, 1998. The notes are due in varying
monthly installments through April 2002, and contain certain restrictions and
covenants, with which we are currently in compliance. As of December 31, 1998,
the outstanding indebtedness under the subordinated loan agreement was $4.5
million.

On August 11, 1998, we issued a warrant to TRS to purchase shares of our
Series E preferred stock which, in connection with our initial public offering
in December 1998, converted into a warrant to purchase 2,325,000 shares of our
common stock. In December 1998, TRS partially exercised the warrant to purchase
225,000 shares at $11.625 per share. Additionally, under the warrant, TRS may
acquire 700,000 shares at any time on or before October 15, 1999 at a cash
purchase price of $33.75 per share, 700,000 additional shares at any time on or
before January 15, 2001 at a cash purchase price of $50.625 per share, and
700,000 shares at any time on or before January 15, 2002 at a cash purchase
price of $85.00 per share.

32
<PAGE> 35

We currently anticipate that for the foreseeable future we will continue to
experience significant growth in our operating expenses related to augmenting
our sales and marketing operations, increasing research and development and
extending our professional service capabilities. We also anticipate developing
new distribution channels, improving our operational and financial systems,
entering new markets for our products and services and possibly acquiring or
investing in complementary businesses, products or technologies or investing in
joint ventures. Such expenditures will be a material use of our cash resources,
including a portion of the net proceeds of this offering. We believe that the
net proceeds of this offering, together with our existing cash and cash
equivalents and available bank borrowings, will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least
the next 12 months. Thereafter, we may require additional funds to support our
working capital requirements or for other purposes and may seek to raise such
additional funds through private or public sales of securities, strategic
relationships, bank debt, financing under leasing arrangements, or otherwise. If
additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities,
stockholders may experience additional dilution, or such equity securities may
have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders of our
common stock. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be
available on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available or
are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to develop or enhance
our products, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive
pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Concur's operating results are sensitive to changes in the general level of
U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of its cash equivalents are
invested in short-term debt instruments while certain portions of its
outstanding long-term debt bear interest at variable rates. An increase or
decrease in the U.S. interest rate of 1% would result in a change of
approximately $425,000 in operating results.

YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE

Background of Year 2000 Issues

Many currently installed computer systems and software products are unable
to distinguish between twentieth century dates and twenty-first century dates
because such systems were developed using two digits rather than four to
determine the applicable year. For example, computer programs that have
date-sensitive software may recognize a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather
than the year 2000. This error could result in system failures or
miscalculations causing disruptions of operations, including, among other
things, a temporary inability to process transactions, send invoices or engage
in similar normal business activities. As a result, many companies' software and
computer systems may need to be upgraded or replaced to comply with such "Year
2000" requirements.

State of Readiness

Our business is dependent on the operation of numerous systems that could
potentially be affected by Year 2000-related problems. Those systems include,
among others:

- hardware and software systems used by us to deliver products and services
to customers, including our proprietary software systems as well as
software supplied by third parties;

33
<PAGE> 36

- communications networks such as the Internet and private Intranets;

- the internal systems of our customers and suppliers;

- software products sold to customers;

- the hardware and software systems used internally by us in the management
of our business; and

- non-information technology systems and services, such as power, telephone
systems and building systems.

We have established a Year 2000 Compliance Task Force, composed of
high-level representatives of the product, management and information systems
and legal departments. The task force has been charged with the responsibility
of formulating and implementing our Year 2000 readiness and is applying a phased
approach to analyzing our operations and relationships as they relate to the
Year 2000 problem. The phases of our Year 2000 program are as follows:

(1) establishment of a Year 2000 Task Force;

(2) assignment of responsibility for external issues, such as products
licensed by us, internal issues, such as systems, facilities,
equipment, software and legal audit;

(3) inventory of all aspects of our operations and relationships subject to
the Year 2000 problem;

(4) comprehensive analysis, including impact analysis and cost analysis, of
our Year 2000 readiness; and

(5) remediation and testing.

We have tested our software products and have determined that the currently
shipping versions of all of our software products are Year 2000 compliant,
consistent with the Year 2000 compliance specifications established by the
British Standards Institute's DISC PD-2001. We are evaluating the Year 2000
compliance of our products currently under development. We plan to continue to
test our current and future products by applying our Year 2000 compliance
criteria and to include any necessary modifications the compliance process
reveals. We have completed Phases 1, 2 and 3 of our program. We anticipate
completing Phase 4 by May 1999, and Phase 5 by August 1999.

Risks Related to Year 2000 Issues

Based on our assessment to date, we believe the current versions of our
software products are "Year 2000 compliant." However, our products are generally
integrated into enterprise systems involving sophisticated hardware and complex
software products which may not be Year 2000 compliant. In addition, in some
cases even certain earlier Year 2000 compliant versions of our software, while
compatible with earlier, non-Year 2000 compliant versions of other software
products with which Concur's software is integrated, are not compatible with
certain more recent Year 2000 compliant versions of such other software
providers. While we do not believe we have any obligation under this
circumstance given that these customers using our older versions of our software
products would in any case be required to upgrade in order to be compatible with
newer versions of other companies' products, there can be no assurance that we
will not be subject to claims or complaints by our customers. Success of our
Year 2000 compliance efforts may depend on the success of our customers in
dealing with their Year 2000 issues. We sell our products to companies in a
variety of industries, each of which is experiencing different Year 2000
compliance issues. Customer difficulties with Year 2000 issues might require us
to devote additional resources to resolve underlying problems.

34
<PAGE> 37

Although we have not been a party to any litigation or arbitration
proceeding to date involving our products or services and related to Year 2000
compliance issues, there can be no assurance that we will not in the future be
required to defend our products or services in such proceedings, or to negotiate
resolutions of claims based on Year 2000 issues. The costs of defending and
resolving Year 2000-related disputes, regardless of the merits of such disputes,
and any liability for Year 2000-related damages, including consequential
damages, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. In addition, we believe that purchasing
patterns of customers and potential customers may be affected by Year 2000
issues as companies expend significant resources to correct or upgrade their
current software systems for Year 2000 compliance or defer additional software
purchases until after 2000. As a result, some customers and potential customers
may have more limited budgets available to purchase software products such as
those offered by us, and others may choose to refrain from changes in their
information technology environment until after 2000. To the extent Year 2000
issues cause significant delay in, or cancellation of, decisions to purchase our
products or services, our business would be materially adversely affected.

We are also reviewing our internal management information and other systems
in order to identify any products, services or systems that are not Year 2000
compliant, in order to take corrective action. To assist us in this initiative,
we have retained the services of a Year 2000 consulting firm. To date, we have
not encountered any material Year 2000 problems with our computer systems or any
other equipment that might be subject to such problems. Our plan for the Year
2000 calls for compliance verification of external vendors supplying software
and information systems to us and communication with significant suppliers to
determine the readiness of third parties' remediation of their own Year 2000
issues. As part of our assessment, we are evaluating the level of validation we
will require of third parties to ensure their Year 2000 compliance and expect to
circulate letters to our suppliers and other business partners requesting their
Year 2000 compliance status. We are taking steps with respect to new supplier
agreements to ensure that the suppliers' products and internal systems are Year
2000 compliant. In the event that any such third parties' products, services or
systems do not meet the Year 2000 requirements on a timely basis, our business
could be materially adversely affected. We could also experience material
adverse effects on our business if we fail to identify all Year 2000
dependencies in our systems and in the systems of our suppliers, customers and
financial institutions. Therefore, we plan to develop contingency plans for
continuing operations in the event such problems arise, but do not presently
have a contingency plan for handling Year 2000 problems that are not detected
and corrected prior to their occurrence. We have not completed our Year 2000
investigation, and there can be no assurance that the total cost of Year 2000
compliance will not be material to our business. We may not identify and
remediate all significant Year 2000 problems on a timely basis, remediation
efforts may involve significant time and expense, and unremediated problems may
have a material adverse effect on our business. See "Risk Factors--Year 2000
considerations among our customers and potential customers may reduce our sales"
and "--Year 2000 compliance costs are difficult to assess."

ACQUISITION OF 7SOFTWARE

On June 30, 1998, we acquired 7Software, a privately-held software company
and the developer of CompanyStore. As of the date of acquisition, the
CompanyStore developmental project consisted of ongoing research and development
efforts in the following areas: compatibility with additional databases;
compatibility with additional enterprise resource planning platforms; multiple
catalog support; fundamental redesign of the user interface; and redesign and
rewriting of the administrative functionality.

35
<PAGE> 38

Based on our initial estimates, the remaining research and development
efforts relating to the completion of the CompanyStore technology were expected
to continue into the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the anticipated product
release date. Accordingly, the cost to complete the in-process technology was
estimated based on the number of man-months required to reach technological
feasibility for the CompanyStore technology, the type of professional and
engineering staff involved in the completion process and their fully burdened
monthly salaries. We estimated the direct costs to achieve technological
feasibility to be approximately $307,000. Beyond this period, we estimated
significantly less expense to support and maintain active products identified at
the acquisition date to be in-process technology. If the in-process projects
contemplated in our forecast are not successfully developed, future revenue and
profitability might be adversely affected. Additionally, the value of other
intangible assets acquired may become impaired.

In connection with the acquisition, we determined the fair value of all
identifiable assets, including technology assets, for purposes of allocating the
purchase price. To determine the value of the acquired in-process research and
development, the expected future cash flows of the in-process technology were
based on forecasts of future results that we believe are likely to occur. The
future cash flows were discounted taking into account the state of development
of the in-process project, the cost to complete that project, the expected
income stream, the life cycle of the product ultimately developed, and the
associated risks. Such risks include, but are not limited to, the inherent
difficulties and uncertainties in completing the project and thereby achieving
technological feasibility, and the risks related to the viability of and
potential changes to future markets. This analysis resulted in amounts assigned
to the acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet
reached technological feasibility, as defined and utilized by us in assessing
software capitalization, and do not have alternative future uses.

We estimated revenues and related expenses for the in-process technology
from the acquisition date through the end of our fiscal 2002. Our analysis
considered the anticipated product release date for the acquired CompanyStore
developmental project. The overall life of the in-process technology was
estimated to be approximately four years for the CompanyStore technology. Our
aggregate projections reflect revenue growth in earlier periods resulting from
an expanding market for procurement software products. Operating expenses,
including general and administrative, marketing and sales, were based on
anticipated costs after the 7Software operations were merged into our operating
structure.

We discounted the net cash flows of the in-process technology to their
present value using a discount rate of 35%. This was determined to be higher
than our weighted average cost of capital, or WACC, due to the fact that the
technology had not yet reached technological feasibility as of the date of
valuation. In utilizing a discount rate greater than WACC, we have reflected the
risk premium associated with achieving the forecasted cash flows associated with
these projects.

The CompanyStore developmental project, as of the acquisition date, was
estimated to be developed during the fourth quarter of 7Software's fiscal 1998
and fiscal 1999 and released during our fiscal 1999. We continue to expect to
achieve the forecasted revenue attributable to the in-process project, as set
forth in the valuation, when it is released. Because we believe that we will
achieve revenue levels and incur product development costs similar to those
originally estimated, we expect only slight variations between assumptions and
actual results. Therefore, we do not anticipate any material impact on
operations or financial position unless the in-process project is not completed.

36
<PAGE> 39

BUSINESS

The following description contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the
results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such
results to differ include those discussed in "Risk Factors" and "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

OVERVIEW

We are a leading provider of Intranet-based employee-facing software
applications that extend automation to employees throughout the enterprise and
to partners, vendors and service providers in the extended enterprise. Our
Xpense Management Solution, or XMS, and CompanyStore products automate the
preparation, approval, processing and data analysis of travel and entertainment
expense reports and front-office procurement requisitions. We recently
introduced our Employee Desktop product, which integrates XMS and CompanyStore
through a common user interface and provides a business portal through which
corporate customers and third parties can deliver other information and services
to employees. We believe we are the leading provider of travel and entertainment
expense management solutions, based on a combination of the number of customers
we serve and the features our solutions provide. Since 1996, we have licensed
our products to over 175 enterprise customers for use by over 900,000 end users.
By automating manual, paper-based processes, our products reduce processing
costs and enable customers to consolidate purchases with preferred vendors and
negotiate vendor discounts.

INDUSTRY BACKGROUND

In response to increasingly competitive conditions worldwide, businesses
are seeking cost savings and productivity gains through business process
automation. Rather than internally developing applications to automate business
processes, companies are increasingly turning to independent software vendors
for solutions in areas such as finance and accounting, manufacturing, human
resources, supply chain management, customer support and sales force automation.
These solutions have traditionally targeted discrete functional or department
level business processes involving relatively few employees.

Businesses are now seeking similar applications to replace manual,
paper-based processes involving the vast majority of employees throughout the
enterprise. Such "employee-facing" business processes include travel and
entertainment expense management, front-office procurement, human resources
self-service, time and attendance, and facilities management. Typically, these
processes are characterized by extensive corporate policies, detailed forms,
manual data entry, multiple approvals, manual review and audit, manual financial
system posting and cumbersome interactions with third-party suppliers and
service providers.

The emergence of the Internet and corporate Intranets has made it possible
to deploy applications that reach all employees in the enterprise and to connect
the enterprise to corporate partners, vendors and service providers. In
addition, in contrast to traditional client-server applications, Intranet-based
applications can be deployed rapidly and cost-effectively throughout the
enterprise. The Internet also allows a software vendor to act as an outsourced
enterprise service provider, or ESP, delivering employee-facing applications
through the Internet to reduce customers' up-front costs and IT infrastructure
commitments.

37
<PAGE> 40

Customers using our products can realize significant operating cost savings
through reduced processing costs, consolidated purchases with preferred vendors
and negotiated vendor discounts. For example, according to the 1997 American
Express Travel and Entertainment Management Process Study published in 1997 by
American Express, a subsidiary of which became one of our stockholders in August
1998, corporations on average spend $36 per travel and entertainment expense
report processed, factoring in costs such as employee time required to complete
expense reports, management approvals and administrative processing of expense
reports, but can reduce such costs to as little as $8 through best-in-class
automation. Per transaction savings of this magnitude are significant for
enterprises with large numbers of similar transactions. Based on the savings
suggested by the American Express study, businesses that process from 1,000 to
5,000 travel and entertainment expense reports per month might achieve savings
ranging from $300,000 to $1.5 million per year. Similar savings can be achieved
by automating front-office procurement. We believe that companies typically
spend in excess of $75 to process each requisition, which can be reduced to
approximately $25 using best-in-class automation. Automation not only can lower
the cost of processing expense reports and procurement requisitions, but also
can provide information that can be used to negotiate discounts from vendors and
service providers. Based on the amounts spent on travel and entertainment and
front-office procurement, even a small percentage reduction in vendor charges
can result in significant savings. For example, the American Express study
reported that U.S. businesses spent $156 billion in 1996 on direct travel and
entertainment expenses such as airfare, hotel stays and car rentals.

We believe that the substantial potential savings from processing cost
reductions and vendor discounts, coupled with the emergence of Intranet and
Internet technologies, has created a significant demand for employee-facing
applications. We further believe that the most successful employee-facing
applications will improve the efficiency of travel and entertainment expense
management, front-office procurement and other similar business processes and
will be:

- based on Internet technologies;

- rapidly deployable and highly scalable;

- offered as part of an integrated suite of related applications;

- integrated with enterprises' existing IT infrastructures; and

- capable of linking businesses with their corporate partners, vendors and
service providers through the Internet.

Successful providers of such employee-facing applications will be able to
deliver cost savings and other tangible benefits to corporate management, meet
the needs of enterprise IT professionals and reduce burdens on employees.

THE CONCUR SOLUTION

We are a leading provider of Intranet-based employee-facing applications
that extend automation to employees throughout an enterprise and to partners,
vendors and service providers in the extended enterprise. Our XMS and
CompanyStore products automate the preparation, approval, processing and data
analysis of travel and entertainment expense reports and front-office
procurement requisitions. We recently introduced Employee Desktop, which
integrates XMS and CompanyStore through a common user interface and provides a
business portal through which corporate customers and third parties can deliver
other information and services to employees. We believe that we are the leading
provider

38
<PAGE> 41

of travel and entertainment expense management solutions based on a combination
of the number of customers we serve and the features our solutions provide.
Since 1996, we have licensed our products to over 175 enterprise customers for
use by over 900,000 end users. Our products benefit a number of constituencies
within the enterprise, including corporate management, IT professionals and
employees, in the following ways.

Benefits for Corporate Management

Reduced Processing Costs. Our products can significantly reduce the amount
of labor associated with manual, paper-based travel and entertainment expense
management and front-office procurement systems, by automating the process of
preparation, approval, processing and data analysis. We believe that companies
using our solutions as part of best-in-class processes can achieve significant
cost savings. According to the American Express study, corporations on average
spend $36 per travel and entertainment expense report processed, but can reduce
such costs to as little as $8 through best-in-class automation. Similarly,
industry estimates indicate that companies typically spend in excess of $75 to
process each requisition for front-office goods and services. We believe that
this estimate is typical and that enterprises using best-in-class automation for
such processes can reduce that cost to approximately $25.

Improved Supplier Management. Our products enable customers to collect and
analyze data on travel and entertainment expenses and front-office procurement.
Customers can use this data to help consolidate purchases with preferred
vendors, negotiate vendor discounts and monitor compliance with pre-negotiated
rates. We believe that the savings from improved supplier management can be
substantial. For example, one XMS customer informed us that, after implementing
XMS, it was able to reduce its annual spending on air travel by 5% to 10%.

Improved Cash Management. Our products enable customers to improve their
cash management positions and cash forecasting abilities by controlling the
timing of payments to travel and entertainment and front-office suppliers and
vendors.

Improved Policy-Making and Monitoring. Our products facilitate budgeting,
policy-making and trend analysis, and monitoring of compliance with corporate
policy.

Benefits for IT Professionals

Rapid Deployment. Our Intranet-based products are designed to be deployed
rapidly within today's existing corporate IT infrastructures without requiring
modifications to customer systems. We offer applications configured to customer
requirements rather than solutions customized on a customer-by-customer basis.
Once installed on a customer's Intranet servers, our products can reach
employees enterprise-wide. For example, one of our customers deployed XMS to
over 25,000 employees within 90 days after the customer began its rollout, and
another customer deployed CompanyStore within five weeks. In addition, customers
with Employee Desktop can leverage the installation of XMS or CompanyStore to
deploy additional applications.

Enterprise-Wide Scalability. Our Intranet-based products are designed to
reach employees throughout the enterprise, regardless of the organization's
size. We have licensed our products to customers seeking to deploy to as few as
100 employees and as many as 135,000 employees, with the largest deployment to
date being to over 50,000 employees.

39
<PAGE> 42

Leverage of Existing IT Infrastructure. Because most businesses operate in
a heterogeneous computing environment, our products are designed to interact and
interoperate with a broad range of software platforms and products, including
multiple operating systems, browsers, databases, accounting packages and major
ERP programs.

Connectivity to Third Parties. Our Intranet-based products are designed to
enable enterprises to link their systems with those of their corporate partners,
vendors and service providers, including corporate charge card providers such as
American Express, travel booking applications and suppliers such as BT Office
Products International, Inc.

Common Technology Platform. Our Employee Desktop product provides a common
user interface and a common technology platform to integrate XMS, CompanyStore
and future applications. This enables IT personnel to administer employee-facing
applications more easily because the data is captured in a central database, and
to deploy software applications in the suite, and updates to those applications,
from a central location.

Benefits for Employees

Faster Reimbursement and Order Fulfillment. Our solutions enable businesses
to reduce the time required to reimburse employees for their travel and
entertainment expenses and to fulfill front-office requisitions. Features that
expedite the process include automated electronic approval routing, links to
automatic deposit systems, links with approved vendors, on-line status updates
and automatic posting to ERP and financial programs. The American Express study
reported that the time from submission of an expense report to reimbursement
could be reduced from an average of 22 days to as few as three days using
best-in-class automation processes.

Ease of Use. Our products contain easy-to-use features and functions that
reduce the time users spend preparing travel and entertainment expense reports
and front-office requisitions. XMS uses corporate credit card information to
"prepopulate" a user's expense report automatically. XMS prepopulates expense
reports based on past experience and preferences. CompanyStore allows
reconciliation of purchasing card transactions. In addition, corporate policies
and preferred vendors can be integrated into the applications, and detailed
explanations of corporate policies are available on-line. These features reduce
errors, save user time and effort, and improve expense reconciliation. In
addition, we believe Employee Desktop makes it easier for employees to learn and
utilize XMS and CompanyStore by integrating them through a common user
interface.

STRATEGY

Our objective is to be the leading provider of Internet-based
employee-facing applications that extend automation to employees throughout the
enterprise and to partners, vendors and service providers in the extended
enterprise. Key elements of our strategy include:

Extend Leadership Position. We intend to extend our leadership position in
travel and entertainment expense management solutions and to leverage that
position to sell CompanyStore, our front-office procurement product. In order to
accommodate anticipated future demand for our products, we intend to increase
the size of our direct sales and telesales organizations significantly. We
believe that expanding our sales and marketing organization will enhance our
ability to sell our products to new customers globally. We also believe that an
expanded sales force will allow us to sell CompanyStore and future applications
to our current customers.

40
<PAGE> 43

Expand Product Functionality. We plan to continue our innovation and
development of advanced features and functionality for Employee Desktop, XMS and
CompanyStore.

Extend Product Suite. We plan to extend our employee-facing application
suite by acquisition and internal development. We expect to target additional
employee-facing applications that can offer compelling benefits to the
enterprise such as human resources self-service, time and attendance, and
facilities management applications.

Leverage Employee Desktop to Sell Multiple Applications. We believe that
Employee Desktop will improve our ability to sell multiple applications provided
by us or by third parties to existing and new customers.

Expand International Presence. We believe that considerable untapped demand
exists for our products outside of the United States. For fiscal 1998, our
international revenues accounted for less than five percent of our total
revenues. We intend to accelerate our investment in international sales and
marketing in an effort to increase sales of our employee-facing applications
worldwide. We also plan to localize our applications for new countries, and add
new features and functionality to Employee Desktop, XMS and CompanyStore to
accommodate accounting, customs, currency and tax requirements of foreign
jurisdictions.

Extend Relationships With Strategic Third Parties. We intend to expand our
relationships with existing strategic partners and to develop additional
relationships with providers of complementary third-party applications and
products. We have developed strong relationships with leading corporate charge
card providers, payroll processors and systems integration and consulting firms,
and intend to establish similar relationships with purchasing card providers,
information technology outsourcing companies and telecommunications providers.
We intend to integrate CompanyStore with leading front-office supply vendors to
provide our customers with greater access to those vendors.

Offer Enterprise Service Provider Solutions. In addition to licensing our
software, we plan to offer our solutions as an Internet-based ESP on a
per-transaction or subscription pricing basis to companies seeking to outsource
their employee-facing business applications. We expect that this opportunity
will be particularly attractive to middle-market customers with 100-750 licensed
end users, which typically have limited IT staffing and budget. We plan to offer
our outsourced ESP products starting with XMS in the second half of calendar
1999 and continuing with CompanyStore and Employee Desktop in fiscal 2000.

Our strategy involves substantial risk. There can be no assurance that we
will be successful in implementing our strategy or that it will lead to
achievement of our objectives. If we are unable to implement our strategy
effectively, our business would be materially adversely affected.

PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY

Our current product line consists of:

- Employee Desktop, which provides a common user interface to integrate our
current products;

- XMS, our market-leading travel and entertainment expense management
application; and

- CompanyStore, our easy-to-use front-office procurement application.

41
<PAGE> 44

Substantially all revenues to date have been derived from XMS and related
services. We shipped an enterprise-wide, client-server based version of XMS in
July 1996, and shipped the Intranet-based version of XMS in March 1998. For
customers without corporate Intranets or for users not connected to the
Internet, we provide a disconnected Windows-based version of XMS, which is
interoperable with the Intranet version of XMS. Since 1996, we have licensed our
products to over 175 companies for use by over 900,000 end users. We generally
offer licenses for our software based on the number of users or employees at a
given enterprise. The typical order size for our products and services ranges
from $50,000 to $500,000, with certain transactions that have been greater than
$1 million.

Employee Desktop

Employee Desktop provides a common user interface to integrate XMS and
CompanyStore, and provides a business portal through which corporate customers
and third parties can deliver other information and services to employees.
Employee Desktop improves employee productivity by integrating XMS and
CompanyStore with common features, such as the user interface, applications
icons, approval reminders, status updates and passwords. Features include
frequently asked questions and helpful tips about the applications. It enables
IT personnel to easily administer employee-facing applications that are
integrated into Employee Desktop, because all the data is captured in a central
database, eliminating the need to support, maintain and manage multiple servers
and software programs. In addition, IT personnel can deploy the applications in
our suite, and deliver updates to those applications from a central location.
Concur plans to offer application programming interfaces to allow third party
vendors and customers to integrate other employee-facing applications into the
Employee Desktop framework.

Xpense Management Solution

XMS automates the travel and entertainment expense management process,
including report preparation, approval, processing and data analysis. Version
5.0 of XMS enables integration with Employee Desktop.

Report Preparation. XMS includes a number of features that facilitate
report preparation for the end-user. The application uses corporate charge or
credit card information to prepopulate a user's expense report with transaction
data covering a variety of the information required for the expense report,
including transaction date, type of expense, vendor, location, method of
payment, currency amount and foreign currency conversion. Using a graphical user
interface, the employee supplies additional expense-related information by using
pull-down menus. To eliminate the task of sorting receipts, XMS allows the user
to enter data in any order. The HotelXpert feature of the program automates the
complicated process of itemizing hotel receipts. With each use of XMS, the
application retains commonly incurred expense information and uses this
information to help complete the next expense report. Other ease-of-use features
include simple "checkbook" style input screens, the ability to create
"attendees" lists, mileage reimbursement tracking and automatic flagging of
non-compliant and incomplete entries.

Report Approval. XMS allows each enterprise to determine how expense
reports should be processed, whether by submission to a manager for approval
before processing or by submission to the accounting department for immediate
review and payment. Once the report is submitted, the approver receives an
e-mail message containing an Intranet link to XMS, where all reports awaiting
approval are listed. XMS can be configured to route the report for approval
based on cost center, dollar limit or other criteria. Items that do not

42
<PAGE> 45

comply with corporate policy can be automatically flagged for review, allowing
approvers to focus on problematic items. Approvers can reject individual line
items, while allowing the rest of the report to continue in the approval
process. Once approved, the report is automatically forwarded to the next phase
in the process or to the enterprise's accounting department, and the user is
notified of the action.

Report Processing. XMS streamlines back-office processing of expense
reports in a number of ways. Because all expense reports are prepared
electronically, the processing department no longer needs to check the
arithmetic of each report manually. Moreover, businesses can greatly reduce the
time spent auditing reports by choosing to audit only those reports flagged by
XMS as not compliant with corporate travel and entertainment expense policies.
In addition, XMS reduces the number of status inquiries between employees and
processing departments by automatically updating the status of reports in the
database, and alerting employees via e-mail to the status of their reports. XMS
allows significant time savings by automatically posting expense report
information to the enterprise's ERP or accounting package, eliminating the
manual re-entry of these data. XMS further simplifies processing by producing
bar-coded receipt submission cover pages to validate delivery of receipts
associated with expense reports. XMS also helps companies claim reimbursement of
tax credits by tracking VAT, GST and other international taxes.

Data Analysis. XMS utilizes business intelligence software to analyze
expense data. This information can be presented graphically in various display
formats and allows travel managers to determine total spending according to
vendor, location or other user-defined criteria. Informed by this data, managers
can analyze trends and determine methods for controlling costs or negotiating
more favorable terms with vendors. Managers can also analyze the data to monitor
compliance with corporate travel policies and determine if policy modifications
are appropriate.

43
<PAGE> 46

The following table describes significant features and potential benefits
of XMS:

<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT PREPARATION
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Prepopulates report with corporate credit Speeds report preparation time
card transactions Reduces input mistakes
Retains commonly incurred expense Reduces queries and dependence on
information accounting department
Simplifies receipt entry Ensures submission of all applicable
Itemizes hotel receipts automatically expenses
Prevents submission of incomplete reports Increases employee use of corporate credit
Built-in attendee lists, mileage card
reimbursement tracking, foreign currency
translation
Integrates with American Express online
travel booking application
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT APPROVAL
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Automatic routing of reports Speeds approval time
Flags non-compliant expenses Increases compliance with corporate policies
Line-item approval of reimbursement data Facilitates more efficient use of
Approver notification management resources
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REPORT PROCESSING
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Integrates travel expense data with Facilitates more efficient use of
back-office systems processing resources
Flags non-compliant expenses Speeds report processing and employee
Provides automatic status updates reimbursement
Bar-codes receipt submissions Reduces human error
Tracks VAT, GST and other foreign taxes Reduces queries and dependence on
Verifies arithmetic accounting department
Identifies tax credits
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATA ANALYSIS
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Presents travel expense data graphically Supplies data needed for vendor rate
Allows customer to sort data by employee, negotiation
vendor and type of expense Facilitates vendor consolidation
Drill-down capability Identifies trends and problem areas
Allows monitoring of compliance with
vendor commitments and corporate travel
policies
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

44
<PAGE> 47

CompanyStore

CompanyStore automates the front-office procurement process, including
order preparation, approval, processing and data analysis. CompanyStore has been
licensed to five customers. Version 5.0 of CompanyStore enables integration with
Employee Desktop and adds new features and functionality. See "Risk
Factors--Future acquisitions might harm our business" and "--Our expansion into
the front-office procurement application market is risky."

Order Preparation. CompanyStore utilizes a customer-specific electronic
catalog of preferred vendors and commonly requested goods and services such as
office supplies, computers and other equipment. Using a graphical user
interface, requisitioners browse the catalog to select and order items and place
them in an electronic "shopping basket." Catalog materials can be updated by
either the enterprise or the vendor. CompanyStore contains links to vendor Web
sites, allowing the requisitioner to obtain detailed product information. To
make the ordering process easier, CompanyStore retains information about the
user, including name, employee identification, shipping address, accounting
information and frequently ordered products. To reduce delays and unnecessary
processing iterations, CompanyStore prevents submission of incomplete orders.

Order Approval. CompanyStore allows an enterprise to determine how
requisitions should be processed, whether by submission to a manager for
approval before processing or by submission to the purchasing department for
immediate processing. Once the order is submitted, an e-mail notification of the
order is automatically sent to the specified approver. The e-mail contains a
link to an "approval" Web page, which lists all purchase requisitions that are
awaiting approval by the particular approver. Using the Web page, the approver
specifies which requisitions to approve in each order. CompanyStore enables the
customer to configure approval rules based on cost center, dollar limit,
material type or other criteria. CompanyStore enables authorization of orders
based on digital signatures and prohibits the release of orders without required
approval.

Order Processing. CompanyStore streamlines processing of front-office
requisitions in a number of ways. The customer's purchasing department selects
the items and vendors to be included in the CompanyStore electronic catalog.
After approval, orders are sent to the purchasing department to be processed and
progress reports are delivered to the requisitioner automatically, reducing the
number of status inquiries between the requisitioner and the purchasing
department. CompanyStore can be integrated into the customer's enterprise
resource planning application package so that the order can be entered into the
purchasing system automatically, allowing significant time savings. CompanyStore
allows approved requisitions to be sent directly to vendors via fax, e-mail or
electronic data interchange.

Data Analysis. CompanyStore consolidates purchasing data, allowing managers
to determine spending according to cost center, time period, employee and
supplier. This data allows managers to determine how best to control costs,
negotiate more favorable supplier arrangements and consolidate vendors. Managers
can analyze the data to monitor compliance with corporate purchasing policies
and vendor commitments.

45
<PAGE> 48

The following table describes significant features and potential benefits
of CompanyStore:

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER PREPARATION
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Simple point-and-click ordering Speeds order time
Customer-specific electronic catalog Directs orders to preferred vendors
stores preferred vendors and commonly Reduces errors
requested goods and services Detailed product descriptions available
Retains user information, including Reduces queries and dependence on
shipping information, frequently ordered purchasing department
products and purchasing card information
Prevents submission of incomplete orders
Internet links to vendor Web sites
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER APPROVAL
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Automatically e-mails order to designated Speeds approval time
approver Reduces errors
Digital signatures for order authorization Decreases purchasing in violation of
Automated approval controls based on user company procedures
signing authority Facilitates more efficient use of
management resources
Increases compliance with corporate
policies
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER PROCESSING
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Integrates purchasing data with Speeds fulfillment time
back-office systems Reduces lost orders
Sends approved requisitions directly to Facilitates more efficient use of
vendor or to enterprise's purchasing processing resources
system Improves consistency of items ordered
Updates requisitioner on order progress Allows vendor consolidation
Purchasing department determines items
available in catalog
Prohibits release of orders without
required approval
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATA ANALYSIS
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEATURES BENEFITS
Allows customers to track spending by Identifies trends and problem areas
multiple factors, including cost center, Supplies data needed for vendor rate
time period, employee and supplier negotiation
Allows monitoring of compliance with vendor
commitments
Facilitates vendor consolidation
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

46
<PAGE> 49

Product Architecture

The following diagram illustrates the key features of our product
architecture:
[GRAPHIC]

Employee Desktop, XMS and CompanyStore, operate on advanced IT platforms
and are scalable and configurable. XMS and CompanyStore are built on a
multi-tiered architecture and have a separate client, application server and
database server built using a COM-based architecture. In addition, a common
application server model, the Concur common technology platform, contains all
common business logic, including workflow, user management, security, business
rules, business intelligence and messaging.

The Concur common technology platform contains all of the business logic,
is COM-based and is built using Microsoft Visual C++. The application server
layer can be extended using off-the-shelf tools such as Microsoft Visual Basic.
The application server operates on Windows NT 4.0 and, for browser-based
clients, supports both the Microsoft Internet Information Server and the
Netscape Enterprise Server.

The XMS application server supports Oracle, Sybase and Microsoft SQL server
databases and integrates with multiple ERP systems, including SAP, PeopleSoft,
Oracle and existing legacy systems. The CompanyStore application server supports
the Microsoft SQL server database and Oracle databases and integrates with SAP
R/3 and Oracle Financials 11.0. We intend to integrate the CompanyStore
application server with other database and ERP systems in the future.

Browser-based clients run on versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer 3.02
and above and Netscape Navigator 3.0 and above, utilizing primarily HTML and
JavaScript via Microsoft's Active Server Pages technology. Operating systems
supported include Microsoft Windows 3.11, Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT
4.0. The Windows-based XMS client is written utilizing Microsoft Visual C++, and
is fully functional in a disconnected environment.

SERVICES

Our professional services organization was formed in 1996 to offer
consulting, customer support and training in connection with licenses of XMS. We
believe that

47
<PAGE> 50

services are an important part of our success and consequently we have expanded
our professional services organization to offer similar services in connection
with licenses of Employee Desktop and CompanyStore. See "Risk Factors--We depend
on service revenues to increase our overall revenues."

Consulting. We offer a variety of consulting services in connection with
licenses of our products. Our consulting staff meets with customers prior to
product implementation to review the customer's existing business processes and
IT infrastructure, and to provide advice on ways to improve these processes
using industry best practices. Thereafter, our consultants install, configure
and test the application and integrate it with the customer's existing ERP and
employee reimbursement systems. Our consultants also help customers implement
bar-coding processes and develop a strategy for the customers' enterprise-wide
deployment of the application.

Customer Support. We provide product upgrades and customer support through
our "CustomerOne" customer support program. Customers generally purchase the
first year of the CustomerOne program at the time they license an application;
thereafter, support may be renewed on an annual basis. Customer support
personnel are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We also offer
Internet-based support that features an on-line knowledge base.

Training. We offer a variety of training programs for our products. These
classes are tailored to particular user groups, such as end users, help desk
personnel and trainers. Training classes are offered at customer sites and also
at our headquarters in Redmond, Washington. We also provide training classes for
third-party service providers, such as systems integrators.

48
<PAGE> 51

CUSTOMERS

We have licensed our applications to over 175 enterprise customers in a
wide range of industries. The following table lists a selection of our
significant customers since fiscal 1996:

Technology/Telecommunications/Media
AT&T Corp.
American Management Systems, Inc.
Cambridge Technology Partners
Computer Sciences Corporation
Dell Computer Corporation
The Hearst Corporation
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Motorola, Inc.
The New York Times Company
Quantum Corporation
Reuters Limited
Seagate Technology, Inc.
Sprint Corporation
Texas Instruments Incorporated
The Times Mirror Company
Tivoli Systems, Inc.
Visio Corporation

Industrial/Manufacturing
Allied Signal Inc.
Case Corporation
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Guardian Industries Corporation
Monsanto Company
Northrop Grumman Corporation
PPG Industries, Inc.
Solutia, Inc.

Pharmaceutical/Health Care
Baxter Heathcare Corporation
Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation
Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Limited
Pfizer Inc.
Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.
Tenet Healthcare Corporation

Consumer
Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc.
Avon Products, Inc.
Eastman Kodak Company
The Gap, Inc.
The Gillette Company
J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
Levi Strauss & Co.
Maytag Corporation

Financial Services
ABN Amro Holding N.V.
Bear Stearns & Co. Inc.
Comdisco, Inc.
Dresdner Kleinwort Benson
J & H Marsh & McLennan, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Inc.
Royal Insurance

Energy and Natural Resources
Amerada Hess Corporation
Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited
Exxon Corporation
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Texaco Inc.

Other
American Airlines, Inc.
Battelle Memorial Institute
Harvard College
J. Walter Thompson
Ontario Ministry of Labour

No customer accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues in fiscal 1996,
1997 and 1998.

The following case studies, which are based solely on information supplied
by the respective subject companies and which we believe to be accurate in all
material respects, illustrate how selected companies have used our products and
services to address their travel and entertainment expense management and
front-office procurement needs:

Guardian Industries Corporation. A leading manufacturer and fabricator of
architectural and automotive glass and plastics, Guardian operates over 40
production facilities around the world and has approximately 1,000 employees
travelling at any one time. Historically, Guardian's business travelers filed
expense reports manually after each business trip. This paper-based process led
to processing delays, significant employee time

49
<PAGE> 52

invested in filling out expense reports, and a lack of visibility into
enterprise-wide travel and entertainment spending. Guardian implemented our XMS
application to address these issues, and realized significant advantages and
cost savings as a result. For example, XMS saves employee time by decreasing
time spent completing reports and allows management to analyze enterprise-wide
travel and entertainment spending to formulate more effective travel policies,
evaluate the performance of travel vendors and negotiate reduced costs with
vendors. In fact, Guardian reduced its annual spending on air travel by 5% to
10% after implementing XMS.

Case Corporation. A leading designer, manufacturer and distributor of
agricultural and construction equipment and provider of a broad array of
financial services, Case has over 13,000 employees worldwide with 4,000 business
travelers. Before implementing XMS, Case received as many as 5,000 travel and
entertainment expense reports per month in a variety of formats, from
handwritten reports to spreadsheets. This practice resulted in costly delivery
methods (such as overnight delivery or facsimile), high processing costs, delays
in reimbursement, and reports not in compliance with corporate policies. To
address these problems, Case automated its travel and entertainment expense
reporting process with XMS. Within nine months after deploying XMS on an
enterprise-wide basis, the vast majority of Case's travelers were using XMS and
receiving reimbursements through their regular paychecks. As a result, Case has
significantly reduced travel expense reimbursement related costs. In addition,
Case now reimburses employees and analyzes spending more effectively.

Solutia, Inc. Solutia is a global company that applies its expertise in
chemistry to the consumer, household, automotive and industrial products
industries through 24 manufacturing sites worldwide. Solutia's nearly 9,000
employees include approximately 3,000 who are business travelers. At the time
Solutia decided to reengineer its travel and entertainment expense management
processes, it had 15 processing centers handling approximately 25,000 expense
reports per year. Using XMS as the cornerstone of its reengineering effort,
Solutia streamlined the preparation, approval and processing of expense reports,
consolidated its 15 processing centers into one shared services center, and cut
processing costs by over 50%.

Visio Corporation. Through a worldwide network of offices, Visio develops,
markets and sells drawing and diagramming software for PCs. After implementing
SAP R/3, Visio sought an Intranet front-office procurement system to eliminate
inefficiencies in its paper-based ordering and manual routing of front-office
procurement requisitions. Visio required a system that was easy to use and would
seamlessly integrate with SAP. After selecting CompanyStore, Visio implemented
the application in only five weeks and immediately realized efficiencies in
purchase order processing and product delivery. CompanyStore allows purchasing
and procurement personnel to spend less time processing transactions and more
time evaluating vendors and pricing strategies. Visio estimates that it will
achieve approximately $1 million in savings in the first year of implementation,
from such improvements as decreased requisition processing costs, decreased
non-compliant spending, decreased time needed to process payables, and decreased
time spent by budget managers gathering financial data. Visio recently licensed
Employee Desktop and XMS.

SALES

We sell our software primarily through our domestic direct sales
organization, with sales professionals located in the metropolitan areas of
Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Columbus, Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, New York,
Redmond, St. Louis, San Francisco

50
<PAGE> 53

and Washington, D.C. We also have sales professionals in Toronto, London and
Sydney. The field sales force is complemented by direct telesales and
telemarketing representatives based at our headquarters in Redmond, Washington.
Technical sales support is provided by sales engineers located in several of the
field offices. We currently intend to add a significant number of sales
representatives and sales engineers in other domestic and international
locations. We use a remarketer in New Zealand and plan to expand our remarketing
channel to other international markets. The remarketer receives a referral fee
from us for marketing our products, and provides post-sale implementation and
support of the Company's products. See "Risk Factors--We depend on our direct
sales model."

Since our products affect employees throughout the enterprise, our sales
effort involves multiple decision makers and frequently includes the chief
financial officer, vice president of finance, controller and vice president of
purchasing. While the average sales cycle varies substantially from customer to
customer, for initial sales it has generally ranged from six to nine months. See
"Risk Factors--Our lengthy sales cycle could adversely affect our revenue
growth."

Strategic Marketing and Referral Relationships

We have developed a number of strategic referral relationships. Under
arrangements with American Express, the largest corporate charge card issuer in
the United States, and its subsidiary TRS, American Express may, at its sole
discretion, refer corporate charge card customers that seek a travel and
entertainment expense management software solution to us. TRS has agreed to be a
strategic marketer for the ESP version of XMS. ADP, Inc., a subsidiary of
Automatic Data Processing, Inc., has agreed to refer potential customers for
travel and entertainment expense management software products and services
exclusively to us. We and ADP also agreed to jointly market our travel and
entertainment expense report processing products and services to ADP customers.

Our existing strategic relationships generally do not, and any future
strategic relationships may not, afford us any exclusive marketing or
distribution rights. Many of our strategic partners have multiple strategic
relationships, and we may not be regarded as significant for their own
businesses. In addition, our strategic partners may terminate their respective
relationships with us, pursue other partnerships or relationships, or attempt to
develop or acquire products or services that compete with our products or
services. Further, our existing strategic relationships may interfere with our
ability to enter into other desirable strategic relationships. Any inability to
maintain our strategic relationships or to enter into additional strategic
relationships may have a material adverse effect on our business. See "Risk
Factors--It is important for us to establish and maintain strategic
relationships" and "Certain Transactions."

MARKETING

Our marketing efforts are directed at promoting our integrated suite of
applications under Employee Desktop, extending our leadership position in travel
and entertainment expense management applications and increasing our market
share for CompanyStore. Our marketing programs are targeted at accounting,
finance, purchasing and travel executives, and are focused on creating awareness
of, and generating interest in, our products.

We engage in a variety of marketing activities, including developing and
executing co-advertising and co-marketing strategies designed to leverage our
existing strategic relationships, targeting additional strategic relationships,
managing and maintaining our Web site, issuing newsletters and direct mailings,
creating and placing advertisements,

51
<PAGE> 54

conducting public relations campaigns, and establishing and maintaining close
relationships with recognized industry analysts. We are an active participant in
technology-related conferences and demonstrate our products at trade shows
targeted at accounting, finance, purchasing and travel executives.

We believe that demand is increasing, and will continue to increase, for
employee-facing applications such as those sold by us. We may not be able to
expand our sales and marketing staff, either domestically or internationally, to
take advantage of any increase in demand for employee-facing applications. Our
failure to expand our sales and marketing organization or other distribution
channels could materially adversely affect our business. See "Risk Factors--We
depend on our key employees" and "--We must attract and retain qualified
personnel, particularly service personnel."

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

We have been an innovator and leader in the development of employee-facing
enterprise applications. We believe that we were one of the first to introduce
an integrated suite of employee-facing applications, and one of the first to
introduce a commercially successful travel and entertainment expense reporting
application. We also believe that we pioneered a number of features that are now
common throughout the travel and entertainment expense reporting field, such as
prepopulation with corporate credit card transactions and automatic itemization
of hotel bills. Our software development staff is responsible for enhancing our
existing products and expanding our product line. We believe that a technically
skilled, quality oriented and highly productive software development
organization will be a key component of the continued success of new product
offerings. We expect that we will increase our product development expenditures
substantially in the future.

Our current product development activities focus on product enhancements to
Employee Desktop, XMS, CompanyStore and the Concur common technology platform
that standardizes the software architecture underlying all applications in the
suite. We plan to offer our applications through the Internet as an outsourced
ESP starting with XMS in the second half of calendar 1999 and to provide
CompanyStore and Employee Desktop as an ESP offering in fiscal 2000.

These development efforts may not be completed within our anticipated
schedules, and if completed, they may not have the features necessary to make
them successful in the marketplace. Future delays or problems in the development
or marketing of product enhancements or new products could result in a material
adverse effect on our business. See "Risk Factors--We may experience
difficulties in introducing new products and upgrades" and "--Our plan to sell
products as an Internet-based enterprise service provider may fail."

COMPETITION

The market for our products is intensely competitive, subject to rapid
change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market
activities of industry participants. Our primary source of direct competition
comes from independent software vendors of travel and entertainment expense
management and front-office procurement applications, and from providers of
enterprise resource planning, or ERP, software applications that have or may be
developing travel and expense management and front-office procurement products.
We also face indirect competition from potential customers'

52
<PAGE> 55

internal development efforts and have to overcome their reluctance to move away
from existing paper-based systems.

Our major competitors in the travel and entertainment expense management
field include Captura Software, Inc., Extensity, Inc., International Business
Machines Corporation and Necho Systems Corporation. In addition, several major
ERP vendors such as SAP AG, Oracle Corporation and PeopleSoft, Inc. have already
developed travel and entertainment expense management products, and Oracle
Corporation has developed a front-office procurement product. These companies
have begun to sell these products along with their ERP application suites. Our
major competitors in the front-office procurement field include Ariba
Technologies, Inc., Clarus Corporation, Commerce One, Inc., Harbinger
Corporation, Intelisys Electronic Commerce, LLC, Netscape Communications
Corporation, Trilogy Development Corporation and TRADE'ex Electronic Commerce
Systems, Inc. We also expect to face competition from new entrants including
those ERP providers that do not already market a travel and entertainment
expense management product. Most of the major ERP providers have a significant
installed customer base and have the opportunity to offer additional products to
those customers as additional components of their respective ERP application
suites.

We believe that the principal competitive factors considered in selecting
travel and entertainment expense management and front-office procurement
applications are functionality, interoperability with existing IT
infrastructure, price and an installed referenceable base of customers. We
learned from our customers that XMS tends to be 20% to 200% more expensive than
other competing solutions, depending on the size and the nature of the
transaction. Despite the disparity in price, we believe that we have a
competitive advantage relative to competing solutions. With respect to
functionality, we believe that we offer a product with more features than other
competing products, and that we have often been the first to offer new and
innovative features, such as prepopulation of transaction reports based on
credit card information. Significantly, we believe we were one of the first
providers of a suite of employee-facing applications, and we were the first
provider of an Intranet-based travel and entertainment expense management
solution. In addition, XMS was designed and built to interoperate with existing
IT systems and can often be deployed on an enterprise customer's existing IT
infrastructure. Many of our competitors have chosen to develop their
Intranet-based applications using Java, which we believe is difficult to deploy
on a large scale within today's corporate IT infrastructure. With respect to
price, we position XMS as the premium product compared to the competition. We
believe that this positioning does cause us to lose some potential transactions
to competitors based on price. Finally, we believe that we have a larger
customer base, spread across a wider variety of industries, than our primary
competitors. We believe that this large installed customer base helps us to
secure additional customers.

Many of our competitors in both the travel and entertainment expense
management and front-office procurement markets have longer operating histories,
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources,
significantly greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers.
Moreover, a number of our competitors, particularly major ERP vendors, have
well-established relationships with our current and potential customers as well
as with systems integrators and other vendors and service providers. In
addition, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products, than we can.

53
<PAGE> 56

It is also possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors or
other third parties may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. We
expect that competition in our markets will increase as a result of
consolidation and the formation of alliances in the industry. Increased
competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of
market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. We
may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors
and the competitive pressures we face may materially adversely affect our
business. See "Risk Factors--Our expansion into the front-office procurement
application market is risky," "--We face significant competition" and "--It is
important for us to establish and maintain strategic relationships."

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Our success depends upon our proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a
combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality
procedures, contractual provisions and other similar measures to protect our
proprietary information. For example, we license rather than sell our software
to customers and require licensees to enter into license agreements that impose
certain restrictions on licensees' ability to utilize the software. We currently
hold no patents and do not have any patent applications pending. There can be no
assurance that any of our copyrights or trademarks will not be challenged and
invalidated.

As part of our confidentiality procedures, we enter into non-disclosure
agreements with certain of our employees, consultants, corporate partners,
customers and prospective customers. We also enter into license agreements with
respect to our technology, documentation and other proprietary information. Such
licenses are generally non-transferable and have a perpetual term. Despite our
efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to
copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology that we consider
proprietary and third parties may attempt to develop similar technology
independently. In particular, we provide our licensees with access to object
code versions of our software, and to other proprietary information underlying
our licensed software. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult,
particularly because the global nature of the Internet makes it difficult to
control the ultimate destination or security of software or other data
transmitted. While we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our
software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent
problem. In addition, effective protection of intellectual property rights may
be unavailable or limited in certain countries. The laws of some foreign
countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the
laws of the United States. Overall, the protection of our proprietary rights may
not be adequate and our competitors may independently develop similar
technology.

We are not aware that our products, trademarks, copyrights or other
proprietary rights infringe the proprietary rights of third parties. Third
parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future with respect to
current or future products. Further, we expect that software product developers
will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products
and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products
in different industry segments overlaps. From time to time, we hire or retain
employees or consultants, including through acquisition, who have worked for
independent software vendors or other companies developing products similar to
those offered by us. Such prior employers may claim that our products are based
on their products and that we have misappropriated their intellectual property.
Any such claims, with or without merit, could cause a significant diversion of
management attention, result in costly and protracted

54
<PAGE> 57

litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or
licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not
be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which would have a material
adverse effect upon our business. See "Risk Factors--We have only limited
protection for our proprietary technology and we may be subject to claims of
infringement."

EMPLOYEES

As of February 28, 1999, we had approximately 271 full-time employees, of
whom seven were based in the United Kingdom, one in Canada and one in Australia.
These employees included 69 engaged in research and development, 88 in sales and
marketing, 84 in consulting, training and technical support and 30 in
administration and finance. No employees are known by us to be represented by a
collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a strike or
similar work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.
Our ability to achieve our financial and operational objectives depends in large
part upon our continuing ability to attract, integrate, retain and motivate
highly qualified sales, technical and managerial personnel. Competition for such
qualified personnel in our industry is intense, particularly in the Seattle area
in which our headquarters is located and particularly with respect to software
development, marketing and management personnel. In addition, competitors may
attempt to recruit our key employees. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to attract or retain employees in the future. We are a party to employment
agreements with certain of our employees. See "Risk Factors--We depend on our
key employees," "--We must attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly
service personnel" and "Management--Employment Agreements."

FACILITIES

Our principal administrative, sales, marketing and research and development
facility is located in Redmond, Washington and consists of approximately 80,000
square feet of office space held under a lease that expires in May 2005. As of
February 28, 1999, we also leased sales offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago,
Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, St. Louis, San Francisco, Sydney and London. For
a discussion of certain risks associated with our anticipated need for
additional office space.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any currently pending material legal proceedings.

55
<PAGE> 58

MANAGEMENT

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive
officers and directors:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------
<S> <C> <C>
S. Steven Singh..................... 37 President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Michael W. Hilton................... 35 Chairman of the Board and Chief
Technical Officer
Jon T. Matsuo....................... 39 Executive Vice President of
Worldwide Sales
Sterling R. Wilson.................. 40 Chief Financial Officer and
Executive Vice President of
Operations
Rajeev Singh........................ 30 Executive Vice President of Products
Michael Watson...................... 51 Executive Vice President of
Professional Services
Bruce A. Chatterley................. 36 Executive Vice President and General
Manager, eService
Jeffrey D. Brody(1)................. 39 Director
Norman A. Fogelsong(1).............. 47 Director
Michael J. Levinthal(2)............. 44 Director
James D. Robinson III(2)............ 63 Director
Russell P. Fradin................... 43 Director
Edward P. Gilligan.................. 39 Director
</TABLE>

- -------------------------
(1) Member of the Compensation Committee.

(2) Member of the Audit Committee.

S. Steven Singh has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer
since February 1996. Mr. Singh served as our Chairman of the board of directors
from our inception until February 1996. Prior to joining us as an officer, Mr.
Singh was General Manager of the Contact Management Division at Symantec
Corporation from June 1993 to February 1996. From February 1992 to June 1993,
when it was acquired by Symantec, Mr. Singh was Vice President of Development
for Contact Software International, or CSI, a personal computer software
publisher. Prior to joining CSI, Mr. Singh co-founded Eshani Corporation, where
he was President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Singh holds a B.S. in
Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan. Mr. Singh is the brother
of Rajeev Singh, our Executive Vice President of Products.

Michael W. Hilton co-founded Concur in August 1993 and has served as our
Chief Technical Officer since 1996. Mr. Hilton has served as a member of our
board of directors since our founding, and as Chairman of the board since
February 1996. Before co-founding Concur, Mr. Hilton served as Senior
Development Manager at Symantec during 1993. Prior to his employment at
Symantec, Mr. Hilton served as Director of Product Development for CSI's
California office. Mr. Hilton also was a co-founder of Eshani, where he was Vice
President of Product Development. Mr. Hilton holds a B.A. in Computer and
Information Sciences and a B.S. in Mathematics from the University of California
at Santa Cruz.

56
<PAGE> 59

Jon T. Matsuo joined us in July 1994 and currently serves as our Executive
Vice President of Worldwide Sales. Prior to joining us, Mr. Matsuo served as
General Manager, Consumer Software Division of Delrina Corporation from June
1993 to July 1994. Mr. Matsuo's experience also includes senior marketing
positions with CSI and Bluebird Systems, as well as eight years of experience
with Deloitte Haskins & Sells in auditing, consulting and product management.
Mr. Matsuo holds a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of San Diego and is
a Certified Public Accountant.

Sterling R. Wilson joined us in May 1994 and currently serves as our Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Operations. Prior to joining
us, Mr. Wilson served as Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial
Officer at IntelliQuest, Inc., a leading provider of market research
information, from July 1993 to May 1994. Mr. Wilson also served as Chief
Financial Officer at CSI from 1992 to 1993. Mr. Wilson holds a B.B.A. in
Accounting from California State University at Bakersfield, formerly California
State College at Bakersfield, and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Rajeev Singh co-founded Concur in August 1993 and currently serves as our
Executive Vice President of Products. Previously, Mr. Singh acted as our
Director of Product Management. Prior to co-founding Concur, Mr. Singh served as
a Software and Manufacturing Engineer at General Motors Corporation from July
1986 to January 1990 and he served as a Software Project Manager for the
development of complex computer simulations at Ford Motor Company from January
1991 to March 1993. Mr. Singh holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from
Kettering University (formerly GMI Engineering and Management Institute). Mr.
Singh is the brother of S. Steven Singh, our President and Chief Executive
Officer.

Michael Watson joined us in August 1998 and currently serves as our
Executive Vice President of Professional Services. Prior to joining us, Mr.
Watson was Vice President of Consulting Services from June 1995 to August 1998
at Hyperion Software, where he also held various roles in the sales organization
from October 1990 to June 1995. Mr. Watson also served as the National Director
of Price Waterhouse's Applied Technology Center from 1986 to 1990. Mr. Watson
holds a B.A. in Business Studies from Lanchester University (U.K.) and an M.B.A.
from the Babcock Graduate School of Management at Wake Forest University.

Bruce A. Chatterley is expected to join us in March 1999 to serve as our
Executive Vice President and General Manager of eService. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Chatterley served in various positions, most recently Vice President of
Product Management, at Ameritech Corporation, a telecommunications company, from
July 1994 to March 1999. Mr. Chatterley also served as Director of New
Opportunity Development, Small Business Group, at US West, a telecommunications
company, from February 1989 to June 1994. Mr. Chatterley holds a B.S.S.A. in
Business Public Affairs from Central Michigan University and an M.B.A. from The
American University, Kogod College of Business Administration.

Jeffrey D. Brody has served as a member of our board of directors since
October 1994. Since April 1994, Mr. Brody has been employed by Brentwood Venture
Capital, a venture capital firm, where he has been a General Partner of
Brentwood since October 1995. From 1988 to April 1994, Mr. Brody was Senior Vice
President of Comdisco Ventures, a venture leasing company. Mr. Brody holds a
B.S. in Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley and an M.B.A.
from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. Mr. Brody is a
member of the boards of directors of several private technology companies.

57
<PAGE> 60

Norman A. Fogelsong has served as a member of our board of directors since
July 1996. Since March 1989, Mr. Fogelsong has been a General Partner of
Institutional Venture Partners, a venture capital firm. Between March 1980 and
February 1989, Mr. Fogelsong was a General Partner of Mayfield Fund, a venture
capital firm. Mr. Fogelsong holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Stanford
University, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a J.D. from Harvard Law
School. Mr. Fogelsong is a member of the boards of directors of Aspect
Telecommunications Corporation and several private technology companies.

Michael J. Levinthal has served as a member of our board of directors since
April 1998. Since 1984, Mr. Levinthal has been a General Partner or managing
director of various entities associated with Mayfield Fund, a venture capital
firm. Mr. Levinthal holds a B.S. in Engineering, an M.S. in Industrial
Engineering and an M.B.A. from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford
University. Mr. Levinthal is a member of the boards of directors of Focal, Inc.,
InControl, Inc., Symphonix Devices, Inc., and several private technology
companies.

James D. Robinson III has served as a member of our board of directors
since July 1998. Since 1994, Mr. Robinson has been the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of RRE Investors, LLC, a private information technology
venture investment firm. From 1977 to 1993, Mr. Robinson served as Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of American Express Company. Mr. Robinson holds a B.S.
in Industrial Management from the Georgia Institute of Technology and an M.B.A.
from Harvard Business School. Mr. Robinson is a member of the boards of
directors of The Coca-Cola Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cambridge
Technology Partners, First Data Corporation, and several private companies.

Russell P. Fradin has served as a member of our board of directors since
March 1999. In 1996, Mr. Fradin joined ADP, where he served first as Senior Vice
President before becoming President, Employer Services North America. Prior to
joining ADP, Mr. Fradin was a senior partner of McKinsey & Company, and was
associated with that firm for 18 years. Mr. Fradin holds a B.S. in Economics
from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and an M.B.A. from the
Harvard Business School.

Edward P. Gilligan has served as a member of our board of directors since
February 1999. Mr. Gilligan has been President, Corporate Services Division, for
TRS, since February 1996. From June 1995 to February 1996, Mr. Gilligan served
as Executive Vice President of Travel Management Services for TRS. From
September 1992 to June 1995, Mr. Gilligan was Senior Vice President and General
Manager, Eastern Region, of American Express Travel Management Services. Mr.
Gilligan holds a B.S. in Economics and Management from New York University.

Our bylaws provide for the division of the Board of Directors into three
classes as nearly equal in size as possible with staggered three-year terms. The
classification of the Board of Directors could have the effect of making it more
difficult for a third party to acquire, or of discouraging a third party from
acquiring, control of the Company.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Compensation Committee of the board of directors consists of Mr. Brody
and Mr. Fogelsong. The Compensation Committee makes decisions regarding all
forms of salary, bonus and stock compensation provided to our executive
officers, the long-term strategy of employee compensation, the types of stock
and other compensation plans to be

58
<PAGE> 61

used by us and the shares and amounts reserved thereunder, and any other
compensation matters as from time to time directed by the board.

The Audit Committee of the board of directors consists of Mr. Levinthal and
Mr. Robinson. The Audit Committee meets with our independent auditors to review
the adequacy of our internal control systems and financial reporting procedures,
reviews the general scope of annual audits and the fees charged by the
independent accountants, as well as the performance of non-audit services by our
auditors, and reviews and makes recommendations to the board of directors
regarding the fairness of any proposed transaction between us and any officer,
director or other affiliate.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

None of the members of the Compensation Committee of the board of directors
was at any time since our formation an officer or employee of Concur. None of
our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or
compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers
serving on our board of directors or the Compensation Committee of our board of
directors.

Mr. Brody is a Managing Member of Brentwood VIII Ventures, LLC, the General
Partner of Brentwood Affiliates Fund II, L.P. Several of Mr. Brody's Co-Managing
Members of Brentwood VIII Ventures, LLC are also General Partners of Brentwood
VI Ventures, L.P., the General Partner of Brentwood Associates VI, L.P. Between
October 1, 1994 and October 31, 1998, Brentwood Associates VI, L.P. and
Brentwood Affiliates Fund II, L.P. purchased in the aggregate 1,529,365 shares
of our Series A preferred stock at a price of $1.30 per share, 312,500 shares of
our Series B preferred stock at a price of $1.60 per share, 237,500 shares of
our Series C preferred stock at a price of $2.00 per share, 135,378 shares of
our Series D preferred stock at a price of $3.65 per share and 72,123 shares of
our Series E preferred stock at a price of $7.75 per share. Mr. Brody also
purchased 3,871 shares of our Series E preferred stock at $7.75 per share.

Mr. Fogelsong is a General Partner of Institutional Venture Management VII,
L.P., the General Partner of Institutional Venture Partners VII, L.P. and IVP
Founders Fund I, L.P. Between October 1, 1994 and October 31, 1998 Institutional
Venture Management VII, L.P., Institutional Venture Partners VII, L.P. and IVP
Founders Fund I, L.P. purchased in the aggregate 2,000,000 shares of our Series
C preferred stock at a price of $2.00 per share, 130,193 shares of our Series D
preferred stock at a price of $3.65 per share and 72,090 shares of our Series E
preferred stock at a price of $7.75 per share.

All of our outstanding preferred stock converted into our common stock upon
our initial public offering in December 1998.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our directors do not receive any cash compensation for their services as
directors but are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses in attending
meetings of the board of directors.

Our board of directors adopted the 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan in
August 1998 and reserved a total of 240,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance thereunder. Our stockholders approved this Directors Plan in September
1998. Members of our board of directors who are not our employees are eligible
to participate in the Directors Plan. Option grants under the Directors Plan are
automatic and the exercise price of the options must equal the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant.

59
<PAGE> 62

Each eligible director is automatically granted an option for 20,000 shares
of our common stock on the date he or she becomes a member of the board of
directors. Eligible directors who were members of our board of directors prior
to our initial public offering each received an option for 20,000 shares on the
effective date of the initial public offering. To date, Messrs. Brody,
Fogelsong, Levinthal, Robinson and Fradin have each received options for 20,000
shares of our common stock. Mr. Gilligan is not permitted to accept such stock
option grants under policies of his employer, TRS.

On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each eligible director
who has served continuously as a member of our board of directors since the date
of his or her original option grant is automatically granted an option for 8,000
shares of our common stock.

All options granted under the Directors Plan vest as to 25% of the shares
on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 2.0833% of
the shares each month thereafter. Options will cease to vest if the individual
ceases to provide services to us either as a director or a consultant.

In the event of a merger or consolidation in which we are not the surviving
corporation, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or certain
other corporate transactions as set forth in the Directors Plan, the vesting of
all options granted under the Directors Plan accelerates and the options become
exercisable in full. If a director does not exercise his or her options within
seven months after the corporate transaction, the options will expire. Options
may be granted pursuant to the Directors Plan until December 2008. The board of
directors may terminate or amend the Directors Plan at any time. The Directors
Plan may be administered by the full board of directors or by the board's
Compensation Committee.

60
<PAGE> 63

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid for services rendered to us in all capacities
during fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1998 by our Chief Executive Officer and our four
other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive
officers as of September 30, 1998 and whose compensation was in excess of
$100,000 in fiscal 1998 (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers").

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION
ANNUAL COMPENSATION AWARDS
------------------------------ ------------------
FISCAL SECURITIES
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY BONUS UNDERLYING OPTIONS
--------------------------- ------ -------- -------- ------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
S. Steven Singh................ 1997 $200,000 $ 66,950 --
President and Chief Executive 1998 200,000 140,529 200,000
Officer
Sterling R. Wilson............. 1997 140,874 52,354 10,400
Chief Financial Officer and 1998 150,000 83,459 52,000
Executive Vice President of
Operations
Jon T. Matsuo.................. 1997 131,566 91,700 10,400
Executive Vice President of 1998 150,000 157,989 52,000
Worldwide Sales
Michael W. Hilton.............. 1997 133,000 49,700 --
Chairman of the Board and 1998 132,000 95,330 52,000
Chief Technical Officer
Rajeev Singh................... 1997 92,282 44,169 10,000
Executive Vice President of 1998 115,000 108,027 52,000
Products
</TABLE>

OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL 1997 AND FISCAL 1998

The following table sets forth information regarding stock option grants
during fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1998 to each of the Named Executive Officers. We
have not granted any stock appreciation rights. All options granted in fiscal
1997 and fiscal 1998 were granted pursuant to the 1994 Plan and become
exercisable with respect to 25% of the shares subject to the option on the first
anniversary of the date of grant and with respect to an additional 2.0833% of
these shares each month thereafter, subject to acceleration upon certain changes
in control of Concur. See "--Employee Benefit Plans." All options were granted
at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock at the
time of grant. We granted a total of 196,580 options to all employees during
fiscal 1997 and 746,414 options to all employees during fiscal 1998.

The potential realizable values were computed by (a) multiplying the number
of shares of common stock subject to a given option by our initial public
offering price of $12.50 per share in December 1998, (b) assuming that the
aggregate stock value derived from that calculation compounds at the annual 5%
or 10% rate shown in the table for the remainder of the ten-year term of the
option and (c) subtracting from that result the

61
<PAGE> 64

aggregate option exercise price. The 5% and 10% assumed annual rates of stock
price appreciation are mandated by the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and do not represent our estimate or projection of future common
stock prices.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
-------------------------------------------------------- VALUE AT ASSUMED ANNUAL
NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE OF RATES OF STOCK
SECURITIES TOTAL OPTIONS PRICE APPRECIATION FOR
UNDERLYING GRANTED TO OPTION TERM
FISCAL OPTIONS EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE PRICE EXPIRATION -----------------------
NAME YEAR GRANTED FISCAL YEAR PER SHARE DATE 5% 10%
---- ------ ---------- ------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
S. Steven Singh...... 1997 -- --% $ -- -- $ -- $ --
1998 200,000 26.8 0.375 10/22/07 3,803,321 5,819,869
Sterling R. Wilson... 1997 10,400 5.3 0.20 10/23/06 189,989 276,587
1998 52,000 7.0 0.375 10/22/07 988,863 1,513,166
Jon T. Matsuo........ 1997 10,400 5.3 0.20 10/23/06 189,989 276,587
1998 52,000 7.0 0.375 10/22/07 988,863 1,513,166
Michael W. Hilton.... 1997 -- -- -- -- -- --
1998 52,000 7.0 0.375 10/22/07 988,863 1,513,166
Rajeev Singh......... 1997 10,000 5.1 0.20 10/23/06 182,682 265,949
1998 52,000 7.0 0.375 10/22/07 988,863 1,513,166
</TABLE>

On December 14, 1998, we granted options to purchase 100,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $12.50 per share, to each of Messrs. S.
Singh, Wilson, Matsuo, Hilton and R. Singh.

AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL 1997 AND 1998 AND FISCAL YEAR-END VALUES

The following table sets forth information concerning unexercised options
held at September 30, 1997 and at September 30, 1998 with respect to each of the
Named Executive Officers. No options were exercised by the Named Executive
Officers during fiscal 1997. Mr. Matsuo exercised options to purchase 8,000
shares of our common stock at $0.10 per share in June 1998. The fair market
value of our common stock at the time of such exercise was $6.20, as determined
by the board of directors. The value of unexercised in-the-money options are
based on an assumed fair market value of our common stock at September 30, 1998
of $12.50 per share less the exercise price.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE REALIZED NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED
SHARES (MARKET PRICE UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS
ACQUIRED AT EXERCISE OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR-END AT FISCAL YEAR-END($)
FISCAL ON LESS EXERCISE --------------------------- ---------------------------
NAME YEAR EXERCISE PRICE) EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
---- ------ -------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
S. Steven Singh...... 1997 -- $ -- 71,250 108,750 $ 879,225 $1,341,975
1998 -- -- 116,250 263,750 1,434,525 3,211,675
Sterling R. Wilson... 1997 -- -- -- 10,400 -- 127,920
1998 -- -- 4,983 57,417 61,291 697,129
Jon T. Matsuo........ 1997 -- -- 180,000 10,400 2,232,000 127,920
1998 8,000 48,800 176,983 57,417 2,194,091 697,129
Michael W. Hilton.... 1997 -- -- -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- 52,000 -- 630,500
Rajeev Singh......... 1997 -- -- -- 10,000 -- 123,000
1998 -- -- 4,792 57,208 58,942 694,558
</TABLE>

62
<PAGE> 65

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

We and Mr. Matsuo are parties to a letter agreement dated June 20, 1994
governing his employment with us. Under the agreement, we paid to Mr. Matsuo an
initial annual salary of $90,000, which was to be increased to $105,000
following our initial equity financing, with possible bonuses of up to $50,000
per year. The compensation for Mr. Matsuo was subsequently increased. In
addition, Mr. Matsuo was given benefits that we make available to employees in
comparable positions, and was granted an option to purchase 104,000 shares of
common stock. Mr. Matsuo's employment is voluntary and may be terminated by us
or Mr. Matsuo at any time with or without cause or notice.

We and Mr. Wilson are parties to a letter agreement dated April 21, 1994
governing his employment with us. Under the agreement, we paid to Mr. Wilson an
annual initial salary of $90,000, which was to be increased to $105,600
following our initial equity financing, with possible bonuses of up to $36,000
per year. The compensation for Mr. Wilson was subsequently increased. In
addition, Mr. Wilson was given benefits that we make available to employees in
comparable positions, and was granted an option to purchase 80,000 shares of
common stock. We also paid Mr. Wilson's costs to relocate to Seattle. Mr.
Wilson's employment is voluntary and may be terminated by us or Mr. Wilson at
any time with or without cause or notice.

We and Mr. Watson are parties to a letter agreement dated June 24, 1998
governing his employment with us. Under the agreement, we agreed to pay Mr.
Watson an annual salary of $160,000, with possible bonuses of up to $80,000 per
year. In Mr. Watson's first year of employment by us, $10,000 per quarter of the
possible bonus will be guaranteed provided that Mr. Watson is an employee of
Concur on the bonus payment dates. In addition, Mr. Watson was granted an option
to purchase 80,000 shares of common stock. We also agreed to pay a one-time
relocation allowance of $20,000.

We and Mr. Chatterley are parties to a letter agreement dated March 2, 1999
governing his employment with us. Under the agreement, we agreed to pay Mr.
Chatterley an annual salary of $200,000, with a target bonus of $100,000 per
year. In addition, we agreed to grant Mr. Chatterley an option to purchase up to
225,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to market value on
his first day of employment with us which was in March 1999. The option will
become exercisable as to 80,000 shares on the first day of his employment with
us, and the remainder will become exercisable as to 25% after one year and as to
the balance in equal monthly increments over the next three years. We also
agreed to reimburse Mr. Chatterley for relocation expenses and up to $20,000 in
real estate closing costs associated with acquiring a home in the Seattle area.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

1994 Stock Option Plan

Our board of directors and stockholders approved the 1994 Stock Option Plan
in April 1994. Just prior to our December 1998 initial public offering, there
were 2,760,000 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under this plan.
The 1994 Option Plan provides for grants of both incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options. The 1994 Option Plan terminated in December 1998,
when the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan became effective. As a result, no further
options have been granted or will be granted under the 1994 Option Plan.
However, termination of the 1994 Option Plan did not affect outstanding options,
and as of February 28, 1999, options to purchase 1,373,430 shares of our common
stock were outstanding under the 1994 Option Plan.

63
<PAGE> 66

1997 Stock Option Plan of 7Software

In connection with our acquisition of 7Software, we assumed the 1997 Stock
Option Plan of 7Software and all options outstanding under that plan at the
closing of the acquisition. No options will be granted in the future under the
7Software Plan. As of February 28, 1999, options to purchase 35,216 shares of
our common stock were outstanding under the 7Software plan.

1998 Equity Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan in August
1998, and our stockholders approved it in September 1998. The 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan became effective in December 1998. Our board of directors
reserved 3,240,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under the 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan, and the following additional shares will become available for
issuance under the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan:

- any shares that are subject to options granted under the 1994 Option Plan
or the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan that expire or terminate for any reason
without being exercised;

- any shares that are issued pursuant to an option under the 1994 Option
Plan or the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan that we repurchase upon
termination of the optionholder's employment;

- any shares that are issued under a restricted stock award under the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan that we repurchase or that are forfeited upon the
termination of the awardholder's employment;

- any shares that are subject to a stock bonus award under the 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan that terminates without shares being issued.

In addition, all of the shares of our common stock which remained available
for issuance under the 1994 Option Plan when the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan
became effective, became available for issuance under the 1998 Equity Incentive
Plan.

The 1998 Equity Incentive Plan will terminate in August 2008, unless it is
terminated sooner in accordance with the terms of the 1998 Equity Incentive
Plan.

The 1998 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the award of incentive stock
options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards and stock bonuses.
Incentive stock options may be granted only to our employees, including officers
and directors who are also employees. All other awards may be granted to our
employees, officers, directors, consultants, independent contractors and
advisors, subject to applicable federal securities laws. The exercise price of
incentive stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of non-qualified stock
options must be equal to at least 85% of the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of options granted under the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan is ten years.

The 1998 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee, which currently consists of Mr. Brody and Mr. Fogelsong, both of whom
are "non-employee directors" under applicable federal securities laws and
"outside directors" as defined under applicable federal tax laws. The
Compensation Committee has the authority to construe and interpret the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan and any agreement made thereunder, to grant awards and to
make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of
the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee may,

64
<PAGE> 67

with the consent of optionees, issue new options in exchange for the surrender
and cancellation of any outstanding options.

The Compensation Committee in its discretion may permit payment for stock
options or restricted stock:

- in cash;

- by cancellation of our indebtedness to the participant;

- by surrender of shares that meet specific criteria set forth in the 1998
Equity Incentive Plan;

- by tender of a full recourse promissory note;

- by waiver of compensation due or accrued to the participant for services
rendered;

- or, with respect to purchases upon exercise of an option only, through a
"same day sale" or a "margin" commitment.

The Compensation Committee may also guarantee third-party loans in order to
help recipients of stock option grants or restricted stock awards pay the
exercise price or purchase price of those options or awards.

Awards granted under the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan generally may not be
transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. In
the event of our dissolution or liquidation or a "change in control"
transaction, outstanding awards may be assumed by the successor corporation. If
the successor corporation does not assume outstanding awards, they will expire.
In the discretion of the Compensation Committee, the vesting of such awards may
accelerate upon such transaction. As of February 28, 1999, options to purchase
704,915 shares of our common stock were outstanding under the 1998 Equity
Incentive Plan.

1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Our board of directors adopted the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in
August 1998, and reserved a total of 320,000 shares of our common stock for
issuance under this plan at that time. Our stockholders approved the Purchase
Plan in September 1998. The Purchase Plan became effective in December 1998. On
each January 1, the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the
Purchase Plan increases automatically by a number of shares equal to 1% of our
total outstanding shares as of the immediately preceding December 31. Such
annual increase may not exceed 320,000 shares per year. On January 1, 1999, the
number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the Purchase
Plan was automatically increased by 170,297 shares, to 490,297. The Purchase
Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, which has the authority to
construe and interpret the Purchase Plan. Our employees generally will be
eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan if they are:

- customarily employed by us for more than 20 hours per week and more than
five months in a calendar year, and

- are not and would not as a result of their participation in the Purchase
Plan become 5% stockholders of us.

The Purchase Plan provides for offering periods of 24 months. After the
first offering period, which will be shorter, each offering period comprises of
four 6-month purchase periods. Eligible employees may acquire shares of our
common stock at the end of each 6-month purchase period through payroll
deductions in an amount between 2% and 15% of their cash compensation, subject
to purchase limitations as described in the Purchase Plan.

65
<PAGE> 68

The first offering period under the Purchase Plan began in December 1998.
The first purchase period of the first offering period will be shorter than six
months and will end on April 30, 1999. Offering periods and purchase periods
thereafter will begin on each May 1 and November 1. The purchase price for our
common stock under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the lesser of:

- the fair market value of our common stock on the first day of the
applicable offering period, or

- the fair market value of our common stock on the last day of each
purchase period.

In the event of a "change in control" transaction, the Purchase Plan will
continue for the duration of each offering period that commenced prior to the
closing of such proposed transaction and stock will be purchased on the purchase
dates based on the fair market value of the surviving corporation's stock,
unless otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee.

The Purchase Plan will terminate in August 2008 unless earlier terminated
pursuant to its terms. The board of directors may amend, terminate or extend the
term of the Purchase Plan, except that the board of directors may not adversely
affect any rights previously granted under the Purchase Plan. If the financial
accounting treatment for the Purchase Plan changes in any way, the board of
directors may make any amendments to the Purchase Plan as it determines to be
necessary or advisable, even if the amendments affect rights which were
previously granted.

INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

Our Bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and
executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. We may also
indemnify our other officers, employees and agents. Our bylaws also required us
to advance expenses to our directors and executive officers in connection with a
legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.

We have also entered into indemnity agreements with each of our current
directors and executive officers to give them additional contractual assurances
regarding the scope of the indemnification set forth in our bylaws and to
provide additional procedural protections.

In addition, our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of
directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Consistent with
Delaware law, we have eliminated the personal liability of our directors for
monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors except for
liability for:

- any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders;

- acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law; or

- any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.

We also maintain directors' and officers' liability insurance.

66
<PAGE> 69

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

Loan Repayment. On September 21, 1994, we entered into a repayment
agreement with S. Steven Singh, our President, Chief Executive Officer and a
director, and Michael W. Hilton, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Technical
Officer. Pursuant to the repayment agreement, we agreed to repay loans
previously made to us by Mr. Singh for $111,500 and Mr. Hilton for $121,500.
Under the terms of the repayment agreement, we agreed to repay the loans on the
date two years following the commencement date, as defined in the repayment
agreement, together with interest at the rate of 7% per annum. In December 1996,
we agreed to issue 64,530 shares of our Series C preferred stock to Mr. Singh
and 70,390 shares of our Series C preferred stock to Mr. Hilton in consideration
for the cancellation of indebtedness under the repayment agreement at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share.

Preferred Stock Financings. From October 1, 1994 through August 15, 1998,
we sold:

- 1,529,636 shares of our Series A preferred stock at a price of $1.30 per
share;

- 1,874,999 shares of our Series B preferred stock at a price of $1.60 per
share;

- 3,884,920 shares of our Series C preferred stock at a price of $2.00 per
share, which includes the 134,920 shares of Series C preferred stock
issued to Mr. Singh and Mr. Hilton in consideration for the cancellation
of indebtedness under the repayment agreement;

- 1,275,338 shares of our Series D preferred stock at a price of $3.65 per
share; and

- 1,648,660 shares of our Series E preferred stock at a price of $7.75 per
share.

Each share of preferred stock converted into one share of common stock upon
the completion of our initial public offering. The purchasers of the preferred
stock included the following holders of 5% or more of our common stock,
directors and entities associated with directors:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASED
-------------------------------------------------------
INVESTOR SERIES A SERIES B SERIES C SERIES D SERIES E
-------- --------- --------- --------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
American Express Travel Related
Services Company, Inc........ -- -- -- -- 645,161
Brentwood Associates VI, L.P.
and affiliates............... 1,529,636 312,500 250,000 135,378 74,703
Institutional Venture Partners
VII, L.P. and affiliates..... -- -- 2,000,000 130,193 72,090
Mayfield VIII and affiliates... -- -- 1,250,000 807,308 69,872
RRE Investors, L.P. and
affiliates................... -- -- -- -- 645,161
US Venture Partners IV L.P. and
affiliates................... -- 1,562,499 250,000 159,993 --
Michael W. Hilton.............. -- -- 70,390 -- 3,871
S. Steven Singh................ -- -- 64,530 -- 3,871
</TABLE>

Transactions with American Express. In August 1998, we sold an aggregate of
645,161 shares of our Series E preferred stock, at a cash purchase price of
$7.75 per share, and issued a warrant exercisable for an aggregate of 2,400,000
shares of Series E preferred stock, to TRS, a subsidiary of American Express.
Upon our initial public offering, the warrant issued to TRS automatically became
exercisable for 2,325,000 shares of common stock. In December 1998, TRS
partially exercised the warrant to purchase 225,000 shares at $11.625 per share.
Additionally, under the warrant, TRS may acquire 700,000 shares at

67
<PAGE> 70

any time on or before October 15, 1999 at a cash purchase price of $33.75 per
share, 700,000 additional shares at any time on or before January 15, 2001 at a
cash purchase price of $50.625 per share, and 700,000 shares at any time on or
before January 15, 2002 at a cash purchase price of $85.00 per share. As was
permitted by the warrant, our board of directors originally determined to cancel
25% of the shares that could have been acquired under the warrant at the time of
our initial public offering or on or before October 15, 1999. In connection with
an amendment to the standstill agreement described below, the board of directors
subsequently rescinded its 25% reduction. Under a voting agreement entered into
by holders of our Series E preferred stock, TRS designated Edward Gilligan to be
a member of our board of directors. We appointed Mr. Gilligan to the board in
February 1999. The voting agreement terminated upon the completion of our
initial public offering.

Under a standstill agreement, TRS has agreed not to acquire beneficial
ownership of additional shares of our capital stock prior to April 10, 2000 if
such purchase would result in TRS owning more than 16% of our capital stock,
including shares issuable upon exercise of their warrant. TRS has also agreed
not to solicit proxies to vote any of our voting stock if at the time we are
publicly traded and subject to the proxy rules.

In December 1997, we entered into a strategic marketing alliance agreement
with American Express, providing for the marketing of XMS to corporate card
clients of American Express. Under the agreement, we agreed to pay American
Express a fee for referrals of American Express corporate card clients that
become XMS customers within 12 months after the referral. The referral fee
ranges from 10% to 22.5% of license revenue realized by us from these clients.
The percentage referral fee applicable to a particular customer is higher than
the 10% base rate if the referral is converted into a customer relationship in a
particularly short amount of time, or if annual license revenues realized by us
from all American Express referrals have exceeded certain levels. In fiscal
1998, we paid or owed to American Express an aggregate of approximately $204,000
under the agreement. In three months ended December 31, 1998, we paid or owed to
American Express an aggregate of approximately $235,000 under this agreement.

In connection with the strategic marketing alliance agreement, American
Express terminated certain customer licenses of its own travel and entertainment
expense management product, and we agreed to offer to license XMS to those
former American Express customers on our standard terms. We also agreed to
provide a special license rate to American Express for a specified number of end
users. That special license rate reflected a quantity discount comparable to
discounts we make available to orders of similar size to non-affiliated
customers. We negotiated license arrangements with the former American Express
customers, and where American Express chose to do so it agreed to pay some or
all of the cost of the former customer's XMS license at the special license
rate. American Express may also choose to pay the costs of maintenance for a
specified number of end users on behalf of its former customers. In fiscal 1998,
American Express paid or owed to us an aggregate of $193,000 under the marketing
agreement. In the three months ended December 31, 1998, American Express did not
pay or owe us fees under the marketing agreement. As of December 31, 1998, the
maximum amount of XMS license fees that American Express may choose to pay at
the special license rate on behalf of such former American Express customers was
approximately $3.1 million.

Under the strategic marketing alliance agreement, we also granted American
Express an option to license XMS for its internal use at our generally
prevailing rates. The option expired in June 1998 without being exercised. We
and American Express also agreed to

68
<PAGE> 71

develop certain product features enabling a higher level of integration between
XMS and certain American Express services and products. The marketing agreement
includes cross-indemnification, proprietary information and confidentiality
provisions, has a three year term and automatically renews for successive
two-year terms unless terminated by either party. The marketing agreement may be
terminated by either party upon an acquisition of us by any competitor of
American Express and by American Express upon the acquisition of 20% or more of
our securities by any competitor of American Express.

In August 1998, we entered into a co-branded service marketing agreement
with TRS, under which TRS will market to its clients a co-branded ESP version of
XMS. The agreement provides that we will develop this co-branded service and
that both Concur and TRS will develop certain special features for integration
into the co-branded service. For 12 months following the release of a co-branded
service containing a special feature, we have agreed not to include such special
feature in any product or service offered by or on behalf of us or any of our
licensees. TRS determines the prices at which the co-branded service will be
offered, and may market the co-branded service initially in the United States
and Canada, and eventually in other geographical areas as we complete our
localization efforts in those areas. We have agreed to offer service contracts
for the co-branded service to TRS clients at terms not materially less favorable
than those offered to our own customers, and we have responsible for providing
warranty and customer support services to these TRS clients. Revenue other than
consulting revenue, direct costs and taxes associated with the co-branded
service will be shared 55% to us and 45% to TRS, provided that we are entitled
to payment of no less than 55% of certain minimum base prices, some or all of
which may be paid by TRS on behalf of the customer, and no more than 55% of
certain higher suggested prices. We are also entitled to 55% of consulting
revenue associated with the co-branded service, after deduction of our direct
and indirect costs, expenses and taxes associated with providing consulting
services. We are also obligated to provide TRS with certain "most favored
pricing" rights.

We also agreed, for the term of the co-branded agreement and for one year
thereafter, not to solicit any TRS client that is a co-branded service customer
to become a customer of a corporate card product or a travel and booking product
offered by a TRS competitor. TRS agreed not to solicit any of its clients who
are co-branded service customers to become a customer of a business and expense
management service offered by one of our competitors. The co-branded agreement
also includes cross-indemnification, intellectual property rights and
confidentiality provisions. TRS has the right to terminate the agreement if the
co-branded service is not available for general commercial distribution to TRS
clients by August 1, 1999. Otherwise, the co-branded agreement has a term of 18
months from the launch date of the co-branded service, and automatically renews
for successive two-year terms unless terminated by either party. The co-branded
agreement may be terminated at any time by TRS if a TRS competitor acquires a
controlling interest in us or if any officer, director or other designee of a
TRS competitor is appointed to our board of directors. No payments were made
under the co-branded agreement in fiscal 1998 or in the three months ended
December 31, 1998.

We believe that the terms of the agreements with American Express and TRS,
taken as a whole, are no less favorable to us than we could have obtained from
unaffiliated third parties.

69
<PAGE> 72

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of February 28, 1999 by the following
individuals or groups:

- each person or entity who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5%
of our common stock;

- each of our directors;

- each of the Named Executive Officers;

- each selling stockholder; and

- all current executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each listed stockholder is c/o
Concur Technologies, Inc., 6222 185th Avenue NE, Redmond, Washington 98052.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED
PRIOR TO OFFERING NUMBER OF AFTER OFFERING
NAME AND ADDRESS -------------------------- SHARES BEING --------------------------
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER NUMBER PERCENT+ OFFERED NUMBER PERCENT+
------------------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Edward P. Gilligan............. 2,970,161 15.5% -- 2,970,161 14.0%
American Express Travel
Related Services Company,
Inc.(1)
Jeffrey D. Brody............... 2,287,137 13.4 500,000 1,787,132 9.3
Brentwood Associates VI, L.P.
and affiliates(2)
Norman A. Fogelsong............ 2,202,283 12.9 -- 2,202,283 11.5
Institutional Venture
Partners VII, L.P. and
affiliates(3)
Michael J. Levinthal........... 2,127,180 12.4 -- 2,127,180 11.1
Mayfield VIII and
affiliates(4)
US Venture Partners IV, L.P.... 1,972,492 11.5 -- 1,972,492 10.3
and affiliates(5)
S. Steven Singh(6)............. 1,030,638 6.0 55,000 975,638 5.0
Michael W. Hilton(7)........... 953,761 5.6 60,000 893,761 4.7
James D. Robinson III.......... 645,161 3.8 322,580 322,581 1.7
RRE Investors, L.P. and
affiliates(8)
Andrew Dent(9)................. 340,452 2.0 22,500 317,952 1.7
Melissa Widner(10)............. 340,452 2.0 22,500 317,952 1.7
Jon T. Matsuo(11).............. 262,180 1.5 26,200 235,980 1.2
Sterling R. Wilson(12)......... 226,208 1.3 22,600 203,608 1.1
Comdisco, Inc.(13)............. 198,991 1.2 35,000 163,991 *
Rajeev Singh(14)............... 189,930 1.1 15,000 174,930 *
Russell P. Fradin.............. -- * -- -- *
ADP, Inc.(15)
All current executive officers
and directors as a group (12
persons)(16)................. 12,894,639 65.5% 1,046,380 11,893,255 54.8%
</TABLE>

70
<PAGE> 73

- ------------
* Less than 1%.

+ Percentage ownership is based on 17,101,641 shares outstanding as of
February 28, 1999 and 19,120,261 shares outstanding after this offering.
Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons and entities named in the
table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares
beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.
Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants that are currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999 are deemed
to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding such
options or warrants for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(1) Represents 870,161 shares held of record by TRS and 2,100,000 shares
subject to a warrant held by TRS that is exercisable within 60 days of
February 28, 1999, expiring in three tranches through January 2002, at cash
purchase prices of $33.75, $50.625 and $85.00, respectively. 700,000 shares
may be acquired at any time on or before October 15, 1999 at a cash
purchase price of $33.75 per share; 700,000 shares may be acquired at any
time on or before January 15, 2001 at a cash purchase price of $50.625 per
share; and the remaining 700,000 shares may be acquired at any time on or
before January 15, 2002 at a cash purchase price of $85.00 per share.
Edward P. Gilligan, who is a director of Concur, is President of the
Corporate Services Division for TRS. Mr. Gilligan disclaims beneficial
ownership of the shares held by TRS. The address for American Express and
TRS is American Express Tower, World Financial Center, New York, New York
10285. See "Certain Transactions."

(2) Represents (i) 2,215,014 shares held of record by Brentwood Associates VI,
L.P., (ii) 68,252 shares held of record by Brentwood Affiliates Fund II,
L.P. and (iii) 3,871 shares held of record by Jeffrey D. Brody. Mr. Brody,
a director of Concur, is a Managing Member of Brentwood VIII Ventures, LLC,
the General Partner of and Brentwood Affiliates Fund II, L.P. Several of
Mr. Brody's Co-Managing Members of Brentwood VIII Ventures, LLC are also
General Partners of Brentwood VI Ventures, L.P., the General Partner of
Brentwood Associates VI, L.P. Mr. Brody disclaims beneficial ownership of
the shares held by Brentwood Associates VI, L.P. and Brentwood Affiliates
Fund II, L.P. The address for Mr. Brody, Brentwood Associates VI, L.P. and
Brentwood Affiliates Fund II, L.P. is c/o Brentwood Venture Capital, 3000
Sand Hill Road, Building 1, Suite 260, Menlo Park, California 94025.

(3) Represents 2,092,961 shares held of record by Institutional Venture
Partners VII, L.P., 75,276 shares held of record by IVP Founders Fund I,
L.P., and 34,046 shares held of record by Institutional Venture Management
VII, L.P. Norman A. Fogelsong, a director of Concur, is the General Partner
of Institutional Venture Management VII, L.P. (which is the General Partner
of Institutional Venture Partners VII, L.P.) and Institutional Venture
Management VI, L.P. (which is the General Partner of IVP Founders Fund I,
L.P.). Mr. Fogelsong disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by
Institutional Venture Partners VII, L.P., IVP Founders Fund I, L.P. and
Institutional Venture Management VII, L.P. The address for Mr. Fogelsong,
Institutional Venture Partners VII, L.P., IVP Founders Fund I, L.P. and
Institutional Venture Management VII, L.P. is c/o Institutional Venture
Management VII, L.P., 3000 Sand Hill Road, Building 2, Suite 290, Menlo
Park, California 94025.

(4) Represents 2,020,822 shares held of record by Mayfield VIII and 106,358
shares held of record by Mayfield Associates Fund III. Michael J.
Levinthal, a director of Concur, is the Managing Member of Mayfield VIII
Management, L.L.C., the General Partner of Mayfield VIII and Mayfield
Associates Fund III. Mr. Levinthal disclaims beneficial ownership of the
shares held by Mayfield VIII and Mayfield Associates Fund III. The address
for Mr. Levinthal, Mayfield VIII and Mayfield Associates Fund III is c/o
Mayfield Fund, 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 250, Menlo Park, California
94025.

(5) Represents 1,706,206 shares held of record by U.S. Venture Partners IV,
L.P., 59,175 shares held of record by USVP Entrepreneur Partners II, L.P.,
and 207,111 shares held of record by Second Ventures II, L.P. William K.
Bowes, Jr., Irwin Federman, Steven Krausz, Lucio Lanza and Philip Young are
the General Partners of Presidio Management Group IV, L.P., the General
Partner of each of U.S. Venture Partners IV, L.P. USVP Entrepreneur
Partners II, L.P. and Second Ventures II, L.P. Messrs. Bowes, Federman,
Krausz, Lanza and Young disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by
U.S. Venture Partners IV, L.P., USVP Entrepreneur Partners II, L.P. and
Second Ventures II, L.P. The address for U.S. Venture Partners IV, L.P.,
USVP Entrepreneur Partners II, L.P. and Second Ventures II, L.P. is c/o
Presidio Management Group IV, L.P., 2180 Sand Hill Road, Suite 300, Menlo
Park, California 94025.

(6) Represents 813,138 shares held of record by S. Steven Singh and 217,500
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999
held by Mr. Singh. Mr. Singh is the President, Chief Executive Officer and
a director of Concur.

(7) Represents 934,261 shares held of record by Michael W. Hilton and 19,500
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999
held by Mr. Hilton. Mr. Hilton is the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Technical Officer of Concur.

71
<PAGE> 74

(8) Represents 416,087 shares held of record by RRE Investors, L.P. and 229,074
shares held of record by RRE Investors Fund, L.P. James D. Robinson III, a
director of Concur, is a member of RRE Investors II, LLC, which indirectly
exercises exclusive control over RRE Investors, L.P. and RRE Investors
Fund, L.P. Mr. Robinson disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held
by RRE Investors, L.P. and RRE Investors Fund, L.P. 208,043 of the shares
are being offered by RRE Investors, L.P. and 114,537 of the shares are
being offered by RRE Investors Fund, L.P. The address for Mr. Robinson, RRE
Investors, L.P. and RRE Investors Fund, L.P. is 126 East 56th Street, 22nd
Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(9) Represents 340,452 shares held of record by Andrew Dent, of which 170,226
shares are subject to rights of repurchase by Concur which lapse in
increments over time. Does not include 4,000 shares held by the Dent-
Widner Family Trust, FBO Ian MacKenzie Dent, referred to in note 10 below.

(10) Represents 336,452 shares held of record by Melissa Widner and 4,000 shares
held by the Dent-Widner Family Trust, FBO Ian MacKenzie Dent.

(11) Represents 64,180 shares held of record by Jon T. Matsuo and 198,000 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999 held by
Mr. Matsuo. Mr. Matsuo is the Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales
of Concur.

(12) Represents 200,208 shares held of record by Sterling R. Wilson and 26,000
shares subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999
held by Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson is the Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President of Operations of Concur.

(13) Represents 74,724 shares held of record by Comdisco, Inc. and 124,267
shares subject to warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999
held by Comdisco, Inc..

(14) Represents 164,180 shares held of record by Rajeev Singh and 25,750 shares
subject to options exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999 held by
Mr. Singh. Mr. Singh is the Executive Vice President of Products of Concur.

(15) Russell P. Fradin is President, Employer Services North America, of ADP,
Inc.

(16) Prior to this offering, represents 12,894,639 shares held of record by
current executive officers and directors as a group and 2,586,750 shares
subject to options or warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28,
1999 held by current executive officers and directors as a group. After
this offering, represents 11,893,259 shares held of record by current
executive officer and directors as a group and 2,586,750 shares subject to
options and warrants exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 1999 held
by current executive officers and directors as a group.

72
<PAGE> 75

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Our authorized capital stock consists of 60,000,000 shares of common stock,
$0.001 par value per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par
value per share.

COMMON STOCK

As of February 28, 1999 there were 17,101,641 shares of common stock
outstanding, held of record by 77 stockholders. Subject to preferences that may
be applicable to any preferred stock outstanding at the time, the holders of
outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends out of
assets legally available therefor at such times and in such amounts as the board
of directors may from time to time determine. See "Dividend Policy." Each
stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on all
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Cumulative voting for the election
of directors is not provided for in our certificate of incorporation, which
means that the holders of a majority of the shares voted can elect all of the
directors then standing for election. Our stock is not entitled to preemptive
rights and is not subject to conversion or redemption. Subject to the rights of
creditors and holders of preferred stock which may be outstanding at the time,
upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the assets legally available
for distribution to stockholders would be distributable ratably among the
holders of the common stock.

PREFERRED STOCK

No shares of preferred stock are outstanding. Our board of directors is
authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by Delaware law, to issue the
preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number
of shares to be included in each such series, to fix the rights, preferences and
privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and to designate any
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, without any further vote or
action by the stockholders. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of
preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. Thus, the issuance
of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a
change in control of Concur. We have no current plan to issue any shares of
preferred stock.

WARRANTS

As of February 28, 1999 we had outstanding warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 2,224,267 shares of our common stock.

ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an
anti-takeover law. In general, the statute prohibits a publicly-held Delaware
corporation from entering into a "business combination" with any "interested
stockholder" for a three-year period after the date of the transaction in which
the person became an interested stockholder unless the business combination is
approved in a prescribed manner. A "business combination" includes a merger,
asset sale or transaction resulting in a financial benefit to an interested
stockholder. An "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with
affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years prior, did own, 15% or
more of Concur's voting capital stock. Our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws do not exclude us from the restrictions imposed under Section 203. The
provisions of Section 203 may

73
<PAGE> 76

encourage companies interested in acquiring us to negotiate in advance with our
board of directors since the stockholder approval requirement would be avoided
if a majority of the directors then in office approve either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder's becoming an
interested stockholder. These provisions may have the effect of deterring
hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control of Concur, which could depress
the market price of our common stock and which could deprive the stockholders of
opportunities to realize a premium on shares of our common stock held by them.

Our certification of incorporation and bylaws also divide the board of
directors into three classes to serve staggered three-year terms, prohibit the
stockholders from taking action by written consent and restrict the ability of
stockholders to call special meetings. These provisions make it more difficult
for a third party to acquire a majority of our voting stock or effect a change
in control of Concur. See "Risk Factors--Our corporate governance structure may
delay or prevent our acquisition by another company."

REGISTRATION RIGHTS

Beginning in December 1999, the holders of 11,815,794 shares of our common
stock (including 2,224,267 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants) will have
rights to require the registration of such shares under the Securities Act.
Subject to certain limitations, if requested by holders of such shares, we must
file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering all securities
requested to be included by all holders with registration rights. In addition,
if we propose to register any of our common stock, the holders of stock with
registration rights may include all or a portion of their shares in such
registration, subject to certain rights of the underwriter's representatives in
an underwritten offering to limit the number of shares in any such offering. All
expenses incurred in connection with such registrations will be borne by us.

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

The transfer agent and registrar for our Common Stock is Norwest Bank
Minnesota, National Association.

74
<PAGE> 77

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Upon completion of this offering, we will have 19,120,261 shares of common
stock outstanding (19,585,261 shares if the underwriters' over-allotment option
is exercised in full). Of this amount, the 3,100,000 shares offered hereby will
be available for immediate sale in the public market as of the date of this
prospectus. An additional 3,864,410 shares are not subject to restrictions and
will be available for sale in the public market as of the date of this
prospectus.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
APPROXIMATE
SHARES
DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF ELIGIBLE FOR
THIS PROSPECTUS FUTURE SALE COMMENT
---------------------- ------------ -------
<S> <C> <C>
Immediately.................... 6,964,410 Freely tradable shares sold in the initial
public offering and in this offering, and
shares salable under Rule 701 that are not
subject to lock-up agreements
June 14-July 16, 1999.......... 44,094 Shares salable under Rule 144 and Rule 145
not subject to 90-day lock-up agreements
from this offering; expiration of 180-day
lock-up agreements from our initial
public offering
90 days........................ 11,165,868 90-day lock-up agreements from this
offering released
Over 90 days................... 895,708 Restricted securities held for one year or
less
</TABLE>

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person, or persons
whose shares are aggregated, who has beneficially owned shares for at least one
year is entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares that
does not exceed the greater of (a) 1% of the then outstanding shares of common
stock (approximately 191,203 shares immediately after the offering), or (b) the
average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks preceding such
sale, subject to the filing of a Form 144 with respect to such sale. Sales under
Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner of sale provisions and notice
requirements and to the availability of current public information about Concur.
A person or persons whose shares are aggregated who is not deemed to have been
our affiliate at any time during the 90 days immediately preceding the sale and
who has beneficially owned his or her shares for at least two years is entitled
to sell such shares pursuant to Rule 144(k) without regard to the limitations
described above. Persons deemed to be affiliates must always sell pursuant to
Rule 144, even after the applicable holding periods have been satisfied.

Concur, our directors, executive officers, and greater than 1% stockholders
agreed pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement and other agreements that they
will not sell any common stock without the prior written consent of BancBoston
Robertson Stephens Inc. for a period of 90 days from the effective date of the
Registration Statement except that we may, without such consent, grant options
and sell shares pursuant to our stock plans.

We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to
register 5,445,086 shares of our common stock subject to outstanding stock
options or reserved for issuance under our stock and option plans, thus
permitting the resale of such shares by nonaffiliates in the public market
without restriction under the Securities Act.

75
<PAGE> 78

UNDERWRITING

The underwriters named below, acting through their representatives,
BancBoston Robertson Stephens Inc., Hambrecht & Quist LLC, U.S. Bancorp Piper
Jaffray Inc., Volpe Brown Whelan & Company, LLC and FAC/Equities, a division of
First Albany Corporation, have severally agreed with Concur and the selling
stockholders, subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement,
to purchase the number of shares of common stock set forth opposite their
respective names below. The underwriters are committed to purchase and pay for
all such shares if any are purchased.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER
UNDERWRITER OF SHARES
----------- ----------
<S> <C>
BancBoston Robertson Stephens Inc.......................... 900,000
Hambrecht & Quist LLC...................................... 825,000
U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc. ........................... 675,000
Volpe Brown Whelan & Company, LLC.......................... 600,000
First Albany Corporation................................... 100,000
----------
Total............................................ 3,100,000
==========
</TABLE>

The representatives have advised Concur and the selling stockholders that
the underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock to the public at
the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to
certain dealers at such price less a concession of not in excess of $1.37 per
share, of which $.10 may be reallowed to other dealers. After the completion of
this offering, the public offering price, concession and reallowance to dealers
may be reduced by the representatives of the underwriters. No such reduction
shall change the amount of proceeds to be received by Concur and the selling
stockholders as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

Over-Allotment Option. Concur has granted to the underwriters an option,
exercisable during the 30-day period after the date of this prospectus, to
purchase up to 465,000 additional shares of common stock at the same price per
share as Concur and the selling stockholders will receive for the 3,100,000
shares that the underwriters have agreed to purchase. To the extent that the
underwriters exercise such option, each of the underwriters will have a firm
commitment, subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the same
percentage of such additional shares that the number of shares of common stock
to be purchased by it shown in the above table represents as a percentage of the
3,100,000 shares offered hereby. If purchased, such additional shares will be
sold by the underwriters on the same terms as those on which the 3,100,000
shares are being sold.

Indemnity. The underwriting agreement contains covenants of indemnity among
the underwriters, Concur and the selling stockholders against certain civil
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and liabilities
arising from breaches of representation and warranties contained in the
underwriting agreement.

Lock-up Agreements. Under the terms of lock-up agreements, each officer and
director and certain security holders have agreed with the representatives of
the underwriters for a period of 90 days after the effective date of the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with this prospectus, that they will not, subject to certain
exceptions, directly or indirectly offer to sell, contract to sell, or otherwise
sell, dispose of, loan, pledge or grant any rights with respect to, any shares
of common stock, or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares
of common stock, now owned or hereafter acquired directly by such holders or
with respect to which they have the power of

76
<PAGE> 79

disposition, without the prior written consent of BancBoston Robertson Stephens
Inc., which may, in its sole discretion and at any time without notice, release
all or any portion of the securities subject to lock-up agreements. In addition,
Concur has agreed that during the 90 days following the effective date of this
prospectus, Concur will not, without the prior written consent of BancBoston
Robertson Stephens Inc., subject to certain exceptions, offer, issue, sell,
contract to sell, or otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock, any
options or warrants to purchase any shares of common stock, or any securities
convertible into, exercisable for or exchangeable for shares of common stock
other than (a) Concur's sales of shares in this offering, (b) the issuance of
common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants or (c)
Concur's issuance of options or shares under its 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, the
Directors Plan and the Purchase Plan. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale."

The underwriters do not intend to confirm sales to any accounts over which
they exercise discretionary authority.

Persons and entities affiliated with Hambrecht & Quist LLC purchased an
aggregate of 25,225 shares of Concur's Series E preferred stock in June 1998.
The purchase of such shares has been deemed by the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. to constitute underwriting compensation in connection
with Concur's initial public offering. As a result, such affiliates of Hambrecht
& Quist LLC agreed that they will not sell, transfer, assign or hypothecate such
shares until one year following the effective date of Concur's initial public
offering, except to officers or partners (not directors) of Hambrecht & Quist
LLC or other underwriters and/or their officers or partners. Hambrecht & Quist
LLC and its affiliates, other than such holders described above, will be
permitted to engage in stabilization, brokerage and ordinary course of business
transactions. See "Shares Eligible for Future Sale."

Stabilization. The representatives have advised Concur that, under
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act, certain persons participating in
this offering may engage in transactions, including stabilizing bids, syndicate
covering transactions or the imposition of penalty bids that may have the effect
of stabilizing or maintaining the market price of the common stock at a level
above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. A "stabilizing bid"
is a bid for or the purchase of the common stock on behalf of the underwriters
for the purpose of fixing or maintaining the price of the common stock. A
"syndicate covering transaction" is the bid for or the purchase of the common
stock on behalf of the underwriters to reduce a short position incurred by the
underwriters in connection with this offering. A "penalty bid" is an arrangement
permitting the Representatives to reclaim the selling concession otherwise
accruing to an underwriter or syndicate member in connection with this offering
if the common stock originally sold by such underwriter or syndicate member is
purchased by the representatives of the underwriters in a syndicate covering
transaction and has therefore not been effectively placed by such underwriter or
syndicate member. The representatives of the underwriters have advised Concur
that such transactions may be effected on the Nasdaq National Market or
otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

Passive Market Making. In connection with this offering, certain
underwriters and selling group members (if any) who are qualified market makers
on the Nasdaq National Market may engage in passive market making transactions
in the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market in accordance with Rule 103 of
Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act, during the business day prior to
the pricing of this offering, before the commencement of offers or sales of the
common stock. Passive market makers

77
<PAGE> 80

must comply with applicable volume and price limitations and must be identified
as such. In general, a passive market maker must display its bid at a price not
in excess of the highest independent bid for such security; if all independent
bids are lowered below the passive market maker's bid, however, such bid must
then be lowered when certain purchase limits are exceeded.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the issuance of the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus will be passed upon for Concur by Fenwick & West LLP, Palo Alto,
California. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be
passed upon for the underwriters by Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP, Palo Alto,
California. Attorneys at Fenwick & West LLP own an aggregate of 4,190 shares of
our common stock.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and the related financial statement
schedule of Concur as of September 30, 1997 and 1998 and for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 1998 and the financial statements of
7Software as of December 31, 1997 and for the period then ended appearing in
this prospectus and the registration statement have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus, and are included in reliance upon such reports,
given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The
1997 American Express Travel and Entertainment Management Process Study referred
to in this prospectus has been prepared by American Express.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-1 with respect to the shares of common stock offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement and its exhibits and schedule. For further
information with respect to us and our common stock being offered, see the
registration statement and its exhibits and schedule. A copy of the registration
statement and its exhibits and schedule may be inspected without charge at the
public reference facilities maintained by the SEC located at Room 1024, 450
Fifth Street, Washington, D.C. 20549 and at the SEC's regional offices located
at the Northwestern Atrium Center, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago,
Illinois 60661 and Seven World Trade Center, 13th Floor, New York, New York
10048. Copies of all or any part of the registration statement may be obtained
from such offices upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC.
Information on the operation of the public reference room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a World Wide Web site at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding registrants, including as, that file electronically
with the SEC.

We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act and we file periodic reports, proxy statements and
other information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy statements and
other information are available for inspection and copying at the SEC's public
reference rooms and the Web site of the SEC referred to above.

78
<PAGE> 81

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors........... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1997 and
1998 and December 31, 1998................................ F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
September 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998 and for the three
months ended December 31, 1997 and 1998................... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the Years Ended September 30, 1996, 1997, and 1998 and
for the three months ended December 31, 1998.............. F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998 and for the three months
ended December 31, 1997 and 1998.......................... F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. F-7

7SOFTWARE, INC. (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors........... F-28
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and June 30, 1998..... F-29
Statement of Operations for the Period May 30, 1997 (Date of
Incorporation) to December 31, 1997 and the Six Month
Unaudited Period Ended June 30, 1998...................... F-30
Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the Period May 30,
1997 (Date of Incorporation) to December 31, 1997 and the
Six Month Unaudited Period Ended June 30, 1998............ F-31
Statement of Cash Flows for the Period May 30, 1997 (Date of
Incorporation) to December 31, 1997 and the Six Month
Unaudited Period Ended June 30, 1998...................... F-32
Notes to Financial Statements............................... F-33

PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)..... F-37
Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Year
Ended September 30, 1998 (Unaudited)...................... F-38
Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)............................................... F-39
</TABLE>

F-1
<PAGE> 82

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Concur Technologies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Concur
Technologies, Inc. (the Company) as of September 30, 1997 and 1998 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30,
1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Concur
Technologies, Inc. at September 30, 1997 and 1998, and the consolidated results
of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended September 30, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Seattle, Washington
October 27, 1998, except as
to Note 18, as to which the
date is December 9, 1998

F-2
<PAGE> 83

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

ASSETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------- DECEMBER 31,
1997 1998 1998
-------- -------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents......................... $ 6,695 $ 15,629 $ 53,277
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $170 and $547 at September 30, 1997,
and 1998, respectively; $597 at December 31,
1998............................................ 4,365 4,988 3,172
Prepaid expenses and other current assets......... 165 536 313
Note receivable from stockholders................. -- 167 167
-------- -------- --------
Total current assets....................... 11,225 21,320 56,929
Equipment and furniture, net........................ 1,088 2,162 2,263
Deposits and other assets........................... 51 336 2,551
Note receivable from stockholders, net of current
portion........................................... -- 333 333
Capitalized technology and other intangible
assets............................................ -- 880 801
-------- -------- --------
Total assets............................... $ 12,364 $ 25,031 $ 62,877
======== ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................. $ 1,082 $ 1,838 $ 2,540
Accrued liabilities............................... 1,294 3,850 6,214
Accrued commissions............................... 509 902 1,007
Current portion of accrued payment to
stockholders.................................... -- 167 167
Current portion of long-term debt................. 329 2,033 2,470
Current portion of capital lease obligations...... 351 1,004 1,288
Deferred revenues................................. 1,477 3,052 3,328
-------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities.................. 5,042 12,846 17,014
Accrued payment to stockholders, net of current
portion........................................... -- 333 333
Long-term debt, net of current portion.............. 2,171 5,632 5,040
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion... 1,516 2,127 1,978
Deferred rental expense............................. -- 183 183
Redeemable convertible preferred stock:
Issued and outstanding shares --
8,564,893 and 10,213,553 in 1997 and 1998,
respectively (Note 11)....................... 17,264 29,685 --
Redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants..... 81 444 --
Commitments
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share:
Authorized shares -- 5,000,000, no shares issued
and outstanding.............................. -- -- --
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share:
Authorized shares -- 60,000,000
Issued and outstanding shares -- 2,289,493 and
3,098,543 at September 30, 1997 and 1998,
respectively; 17,029,732 at December 31,
1998......................................... 259 6,276 76,398
Deferred stock compensation....................... -- (452) (384)
Accumulated deficit............................... (13,969) (32,043) (37,685)
-------- -------- --------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)....... (13,710) (26,219) 38,329
-------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
(deficit)............................... $ 12,364 $ 25,031 $ 62,877
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-3
<PAGE> 84

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------- -----------------
1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues, net:
Licenses......................... $ 1,717 $ 6,347 $ 11,696 $ 2,036 $ 4,045
Services......................... 242 1,923 5,463 1,079 1,960
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total revenues................ 1,959 8,270 17,159 3,115 6,005
Cost of revenues:
Licenses......................... 386 394 558 82 224
Services......................... 839 2,269 5,684 1,097 2,453
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total cost of revenues........ 1,225 2,663 6,242 1,179 2,677
------- ------- -------- ------- -------

Gross profit....................... 734 5,607 10,917 1,936 3,328
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing.............. 2,936 5,896 12,353 2,206 4,687
Research and development......... 1,793 3,401 6,434 1,083 2,612
General and administrative....... 963 1,815 4,687 837 1,637
Acquired in-process technology
(Note 3)...................... -- -- 5,203 -- --
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Total operating
expenses.............. 5,692 11,112 28,677 4,126 8,936
------- ------- -------- ------- -------
Loss from operations............... (4,958) (5,505) (17,760) (2,190) (5,608)
Interest income.................... 92 130 331 54 225
Interest expense................... (43) (88) (467) (135) (222)
Other expense, net................. (44) (61) (178) (12) (37)
------- ------- -------- ------- -------

Net loss........................... $(4,953) $(5,524) $(18,074) $(2,283) $(5,642)
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Pro forma basic and diluted net
loss per share (unaudited)....... $ (1.58) $ (0.21) $ (0.40)
======== ======= =======
Shares used in calculation of pro
forma basic and diluted net loss
per share (unaudited)............ 11,419 10,863 13,968
======== ======= =======
Historical basic and diluted net
loss per share................... $ (2.17) $ (2.41) $ (7.45) $ (0.99) $ (1.01)
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
Shares used in calculation of
historical basic and diluted net
loss per share................... 2,282 2,288 2,425 2,298 5,570
======= ======= ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-4
<PAGE> 85

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COMMON STOCK DEFERRED TOTAL
-------------------- STOCK ACCUMULATED STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES AMOUNT COMPENSATION DEFICIT EQUITY (DEFICIT)
---------- ------- ------------- ----------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at October 1, 1995.... 2,280,028 $ 258 $ -- $ (3,492) $ (3,234)
Issuance of common stock
from exercise of stock
options.................. 8,217 1 -- -- 1
Net loss.................... -- -- -- (4,953) (4,953)
---------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Balance at September 30,
1996........................ 2,288,245 259 -- (8,445) (8,186)
Issuance of common stock
from exercise of stock
options.................. 1,248 -- -- -- --
Net loss.................... -- -- -- (5,524) (5,524)
---------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Balance at September 30,
1997........................ 2,289,493 259 -- (13,969) (13,710)
Issuance of common stock
from exercise of stock
options.................. 100,132 13 -- -- 13
Deferred stock
compensation............. -- 861 (861) -- --
Amortization of deferred
stock compensation....... -- -- 409 -- 409
Issuance of common stock in
connection with
acquisition
(Note 3)................. 708,918 4,378 -- -- 4,378
Assumption of stock options
in connection with
acquisition (Note 3)..... -- 765 -- -- 765
Net loss.................... -- -- -- (18,074) (18,074)
---------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Balance at September 30,
1998........................ 3,098,543 6,276 (452) (32,043) (26,219)
Proceeds from initial public
offering, net of offering
costs (unaudited)........ 3,365,000 37,369 -- -- 37,369
Conversion of redeemable
convertible preferred
stock into common stock
(unaudited).............. 10,213,553 29,685 -- -- 29,685
Conversion of redeemable
convertible preferred
warrants into common
stock warrants
(unaudited).............. -- 444 -- -- 444
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock from
exercise of common stock
warrants (unaudited)..... 225,000 2,616 -- -- 2,616
Issuance of common stock
from net exercise of
common stock warrants
(unaudited).............. 33,537 -- -- -- --
Issuance of common stock
from exercise of stock
options (unaudited)...... 94,099 8 -- -- 8
Amortization of deferred
stock compensation
(unaudited).............. -- -- 68 -- 68
Net loss (unaudited)........ -- -- -- (5,642) (5,642)
---------- ------- ----- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1998
(unaudited)................. 17,029,732 $76,398 $(384) $(37,685) $ 38,329
========== ======= ===== ======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.
F-5
<PAGE> 86

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------- ------------------
1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss......................................... $(4,953) $(5,524) $(18,074) $(2,283) $ (5,642)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Acquired in-process technology............... -- -- 5,203 -- 79
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation.............................. -- -- 409 -- 68
Warrant expense.............................. 5 53 23
Depreciation and amortization................ 144 393 629 124 277
Provisions for bad debts..................... 91 45 453 33 50
Other........................................ 17 -- 183 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable....................... (451) (3,901) (1,040) 146 1,766
Notes receivable from stockholders........ -- -- (500) -- --
Prepaid expenses and other assets......... 63 (84) (616) (43) (1,992)
Accounts payable.......................... (24) 454 756 (657) 702
Accrued liabilities....................... 597 927 2,535 637 2,469
Deferred revenues......................... 412 1,026 1,575 (274) 276
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities............ (4,099) (6,611) (8,464) (2,317) (1,947)
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of equipment and furniture............. (420) (1,020) (40) (24) (6)
Payment in connection with acquisition of
7Software...................................... -- -- (130) -- --
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities............ (420) (1,020) (170) (24) (6)
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from initial public offering............ -- -- -- -- 37,369
Proceeds from exercise of preferred stock
warrants....................................... -- -- -- -- 2,616
Proceeds from sales leaseback transaction........ -- 1,800 192 192 --
Proceeds from capital lease financing............ -- 67 -- -- --
Proceeds from borrowings......................... 563 3,087 5,500 -- --
Payments on borrowings........................... (380) (925) (335) (82) (155)
Payment on capital leases........................ -- -- (500) (22) (237)
Issuance of common stock......................... 1 -- 13 3 8
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred
stock and warrants............................. 7,479 4,612 12,698 -- --
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities........ 7,663 8,641 17,568 91 39,601
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents.................................... 3,144 1,010 8,934 (2,250) 37,648
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period......................................... 2,541 5,685 6,695 6,695 15,629
------- ------- -------- ------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period....... $ 5,685 $ 6,695 $ 15,629 $ 4,445 $ 53,277
======= ======= ======== ======= ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest........................... $ 27 $ 76 $ 398 $ 62 $ 180
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred
stock in exchange for cancellation of notes
payable........................................ -- 267 -- -- --
Issuance of warrants in connection with financing
activity....................................... -- 30 75 -- --
Equipment and furniture obtained through capital
leases......................................... -- -- 1,572 478 372
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred
stock and warrants into common stock and common
stock warrants................................. -- -- -- -- 29,992
Assets and liabilities recorded in connection
with acquisition of 7Software:
Operating assets............................. -- -- 85 -- --
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........ -- -- (15) -- --
Intangible assets............................ -- -- 960 -- --
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-6
<PAGE> 87

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of the Company

Concur Technologies, Inc. (the "Company," formerly Portable Software
Corporation) is a leading provider of Intranet-based employee-facing
applications that extend automation to employees throughout the enterprise and
to partners, vendors and service providers in the extended enterprise. The
Company's Xpense Management Solution ("XMS") and CompanyStore products automate
the preparation, approval, processing and data analysis of travel and
entertainment ("T&E") expense reports and front-office procurement requisitions.
The Company was originally incorporated in the State of Washington on August 19,
1993 and reincorporated in Delaware on November 25, 1998. Operations commenced
during 1994.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The financial information as of December 31, 1998 and for the periods ended
December 31, 1997 and 1998 is unaudited, but includes all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that the Company considers
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position at such dates and
the operations and cash flows for the periods then ended. Operating results for
the period ended December 31, 1998 are not necessarily indicative of results
that may be expected for the entire year.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Concur Technologies (UK) Ltd., Concur
Technologies Pty. Limited, and 7Software, Inc. ("7Software"). All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company generates revenues from licensing the rights to use its
software products directly to end users. The Company also generates revenues
from sales of customer support contracts and integration services performed for
customers who license the software.

Software license revenues are recognized when a non-cancelable license
agreement has been signed with a customer, the software is shipped, no
significant post-delivery vendor obligations remain, and collection is deemed
probable. Customer support revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the
customer support contract, typically one year. Revenues for consulting services
and other post-sales revenues are recognized when the services are performed.

In October 1997, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
issued Statement of Position 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition" ("SOP 97-2").
The Company adopted SOP 97-2 beginning in fiscal 1999. SOP 97-2 has been
modified by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9 as it relates to certain transactions. These
standards generally require revenues earned on software arrangements involving
multiple elements such as software products, upgrades, enhancements,
postcontract customer support, installation and

F-7
<PAGE> 88
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
training to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of
the elements. The fair value of an element must be based on evidence that is
specific to the vendor. Evidence of the fair value of each element is based on
the price charged when the element is sold separately or, if the element is not
being sold separately, the price for each element established by management
having relevant authority. The revenues allocated to software products,
including specified upgrades or enhancements, generally are recognized upon
delivery of the products. The revenues allocated to unspecified upgrades,
updates and other postcontract customer support generally are recognized ratably
over the term of the contract. If evidence of the fair value for all elements of
the arrangement does not exist, all revenues from the arrangement are deferred
until such evidence exists or until all elements are delivered. Full guidelines
for SOP 97-2 and related modifications have not been issued. Once available,
such guidelines could lead to unanticipated changes in the Company's current
revenue accounting practices, and such changes could materially adversely affect
the Company's future revenues and earnings.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity
of three months or less are reported as cash equivalents.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

At September 30, 1998, the Company has the following financial instruments:
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
liabilities, accrued commissions, long-term debt and capital lease obligations,
bank line of credit ("LOC"), and standby letters of credit. The carrying value
of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
liabilities and accrued commissions approximates fair value based on the
liquidity of these financial instruments or based on their short-term nature.
The carrying value of long-term debt, LOC, standby letters of credit, and
capital lease obligations approximates carrying value based on the market
interest rates available to the Company for debt of similar risk and maturities.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and consist
primarily of software development costs. Financial accounting standards require
the capitalization of certain software development costs after technological
feasibility of the software is established. In the development of the Company's
new products and enhancements to existing products, the technological
feasibility of the software is not established until substantially all product
development is complete, including the development of a working model. Internal
software development costs that were eligible for capitalization were
insignificant and were charged to research and development expense in the
accompanying statements of operations.

F-8
<PAGE> 89
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
Advertising and Marketing Costs

Costs of marketing materials and advertising expenditures are charged to
operations when the materials are used or the advertising is first released.
Advertising costs were $711,000, $569,000 and $1,762,000 in fiscal 1996, 1997
and 1998, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which
utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. A deferred tax
asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial
and tax reporting. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

In fiscal 1997, the Company implemented the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ("SFAS 123"). In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, the
Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations.
Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if
any, of the market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant over
the stock option exercise price.

Equipment and Furniture

Equipment and furniture are carried at cost. The Company provides for
depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method for financial
reporting purposes over estimated useful lives ranging from two to five years.
Depreciation expense includes amounts amortized for assets recorded under
capital leases.

Net Loss per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated using the average number
of shares of common stock outstanding. Other common stock equivalents, including
stock options and warrants, are excluded from the computation as their effect is
antidilutive. See Note 13.

Upon the completion of the Company's proposed initial public offering, all
redeemable convertible preferred stock will either automatically convert into
common stock or it is assumed that the preferred stockholders will voluntarily
convert into common stock. Accordingly, pro forma net loss per share is computed
using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and the
weighted average redeemable convertible

F-9
<PAGE> 90
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
preferred stock outstanding as if such shares were converted to common stock at
the time of issuance.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company's customer base is dispersed across many different geographic
areas throughout the world in a variety of industries. No single customer
accounted for more than 10% of the Company's sales in any of the periods
presented. The Company does not require collateral or other security to support
credit sales, but provides an allowance for bad debts based on historical
experience and specific identification.

The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk from its cash and
cash equivalents. Under terms of certain of its debt agreements, the Company is
required to maintain its cash and cash equivalents primarily at one financial
institution.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company's foreign subsidiaries is the local
currency in the country in which the subsidiary is located. Assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at
the exchange rate in effect on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are
translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The
translation adjustment resulting from this process was insignificant at
September 30, 1997 and 1998, respectively and at December 31, 1998. Gains and
losses on foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated
statement of operations as incurred. To date, gains and losses on foreign
currency transactions have not been significant.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the
current year presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In 1997, the following accounting standards were issued: SFAS No. 129,
"Disclosure of Information About Capital Structure," requiring supplemental
disclosure of capital structure, SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income"
(this statement establishes standards for reporting and disclosure of
comprehensive income and its components, including revenues, expenses, gains,
and losses, in a full set of general-purpose financial

F-10
<PAGE> 91
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
statements), SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information;" and SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition." Each of
these standards became effective for the Company on October 1, 1998. The
adoption of these standards is not expected to have a significant impact upon
the Company's financial statements or disclosures. Also, in June 1998, SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities was issued and
is required to be adopted by the Company in fiscal 2000. Because of the
Company's minimal use of derivatives, management does not anticipate that the
adoption of the new Statement will have a significant effect on earnings or the
financial position of the Company.

2. EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE

Equipment and furniture consisted of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------
1997 1998
------ ------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Computer hardware and software................. $ 319 $ 48
Furniture and equipment........................ 33 38
Leased equipment............................... 789 2,607
------ ------
1,141 2,693
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization................................. (53) (531)
------ ------
$1,088 $2,162
====== ======
</TABLE>

In July 1997, the Company entered into a Master Lease Agreement with
Comdisco, Inc. ("Comdisco"), a preferred stockholder, under which Comdisco
agreed to provide the Company lease financing, up to an aggregate purchase price
of $2.5 million. In connection with this master lease agreement the Company
entered into several sale leaseback transactions in September and October of
1997 under which the Company sold assets with a total net book value of
$970,000. No gain or loss was recognized in connection with these sale leaseback
transactions because the fair value of the equipment sold approximated net book
value. Leases executed pursuant to this loan agreement aggregated approximately
$2 million and provide for equal monthly payments over a four-year term with an
imputed interest rate of 8.2%.

In February 1998, the Company entered into a second Master Lease Agreement,
whereby the total financing commitment extended by Comdisco was increased by an
additional $1.0 million, to a total of $3.5 million. In July 1998, the Company
entered into a third Master Lease Agreement with Comdisco, whereby the total
financing commitment was increased by an additional $1.5 million for a total of
$5.0 million. As of September 30, 1998, approximately $1,369,000 was available
under this agreement. The Company accounts for its obligations under these
Master Lease Agreements as capital leases.

F-11
<PAGE> 92
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

3. ACQUISITION

On June 30, 1998, the Company acquired 7Software, a privately-held software
company and the developer of CompanyStore. The Company issued 708,918 shares of
its common stock in exchange for all outstanding shares of 7Software and also
assumed all outstanding 7Software options, which were converted to options to
purchase approximately 123,921 shares of the Company's common stock. The total
7Software purchase price of $6,233,000 includes the estimated fair value of the
common stock ($4,378,000), the estimated fair value of converted options issued
($765,000), $500,000 payable to certain former 7Software shareholders, cash
payments of $130,000 and other direct acquisition costs of $460,000. The amount
due to former 7Software shareholders is payable in the amount of $167,000 per
year for three years. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
Therefore, the results of operations of 7Software and the fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed were included in the Company's financial
statements beginning on the acquisition date.

In connection with the purchase of 7Software, the Company assumed
7Software's 1997 stock option plan. All outstanding options to purchase the
stock of 7Software on the acquisition date were converted into options to
purchase 123,921 shares of common stock of the Company. The outstanding options
can be exercised at a price of approximately $0.025 per share, vest over four
years, and are exercisable for a period not to exceed ten years.

The allocation of the purchase price resulted in intangible assets
(primarily developed software and the value of an acquired workforce) of
$960,000, which has been capitalized and is being amortized on a straight line
basis over three years. Amortization expense for the year ended September 30,
1998 was $80,000. Acquired in-process technology has been valued using the
income approach, resulting in a charge of $5,203,000.

Values assigned to acquired in-process research and development, developed
technology, and trademarks were determined using a discounted cash flow
analysis. The value assigned to the acquired workforce was based on replacement
cost. To determine the value of the in-process research and development, the
Company considered, among other factors, the state of development of each
project, the time and cost needed to complete each project, expected income, and
associated risks, which included the inherent difficulties and uncertainties in
completing the project and thereby achieving technological feasibility and risks
related to the viability of and potential changes to future target markets. This
analysis resulted in amounts assigned to in-process research and development
projects that had not yet reached technological feasibility or do not have
alternative future uses. To determine the value of the developed technology, the
expected future cash flows of the existing technology product were discounted
taking into account risks related to the characteristics and applications of
each product, existing and future markets, and assessments of the life cycle
stage of each product. Based on this analysis, the existing technology that had
reached technological feasibility was capitalized.

As of the date of acquisition, the CompanyStore development project
consisted of ongoing research and development efforts in the following areas:
(i) compatibility with additional databases, (ii) compatibility with additional
enterprise resource planning platforms, (iii) multiple catalog support, (iv)
fundamental redesign of the user interface,

F-12
<PAGE> 93
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

3. ACQUISITION (CONTINUED)
and (v) redesign and rewriting of the administrative functionality. Based on
management's initial estimates, the remaining research and development efforts
relating to the completion of the CompanyStore technology were expected to
continue into the first quarter of fiscal 1999, the anticipated product release
date. Accordingly, the cost to complete the in-process technology was estimated
based on the number of man-months required to reach technological feasibility
for the CompanyStore technology, the type of professional and engineering staff
involved in the completion process and their fully burdened monthly salaries.
Management estimated the direct costs to achieve technological feasibility to be
approximately $307,000. Beyond this period, management estimated significantly
less expense in supporting and maintaining active products identified at the
acquisition date to be in-process technology. If the in-process projects
contemplated in management's forecast are not successfully developed, future
revenue and profitability might be adversely affected. Additionally, the value
of other intangible assets acquired may become impaired.

The unaudited pro forma combined historical results, as if 7Software had
been acquired on October 1, 1997, excluding the non-recurring one-time charge
for acquired in-process technology, are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
--------------------
PRO
ACTUAL FORMA
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Total revenues, net...................... $ 17,159 $ 17,356
Net loss................................. (18,074) (13,350)
Pro forma net loss per share............. (1.58) (1.14)
</TABLE>

The pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results
that would have been attained had these events occurred at the beginning of the
period presented and is not necessarily indicative of future results.

In connection with the purchase of 7Software, the Company also entered into
separate employment agreements with certain former 7Software officers and
shareholders. Under the terms of these arrangements, the Company loaned $500,000
to these officers and shareholders in the form of a note receivable. This
receivable is payable in aggregate annual installments of $167,000 plus interest
at variable rates. The note is secured by second mortgages on real property.

Approximately 124,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued in
connection with the purchase of 7Software will be held in escrow until June 30,
1999 subject to resolution of any unresolved claims by the Company. The value of
these shares was included in the 7Software purchase price, as no such unresolved
claims are known. In addition, as of September 30, 1998, 340,452 shares of
Common Stock issued to the founders in connection with the acquisition included
restrictions entitling the Company to repurchase such shares in the event of
termination. These shares were issued in exchange for 7Software shares that

F-13
<PAGE> 94
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

3. ACQUISITION (CONTINUED)
included the same restrictions. These restrictions lapse at various rates
through June 2000. The estimated fair value of these shares has been included in
the purchase price referred to above.

4. LINE OF CREDIT

In fiscal 1998, the Company had a $2.0 million line of credit for operating
needs. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at the lending bank's
prime interest rate plus 1.5%, which can be reduced to the bank's prime rate
plus 1.0% following the achievement and maintenance of after-tax operating
profitability for two consecutive quarters. The line is limited to $500,000 for
the issuance of standby and commercial letters of credit. The borrowing base for
the line is to be monitored on a monthly basis and is to consist of the sum of
up to 80% of eligible domestic accounts receivable and any letter of credit
backed or insured by foreign accounts receivable; and up to 80% of approved
eligible foreign accounts receivable with a limit of the aggregate funds
advanced against such accounts, not to exceed $300,000. Interest is due monthly
and principal is due upon maturity.

There were no outstanding borrowings under this line at September 30, 1998.
The bank had issued standby letters of credit on behalf of the Company at
September 30, 1998 in the amount of $465,000, and the amount available under the
line of credit on that date was $1,535,000. The line is secured by all
non-leased assets of the Company, including intellectual property. The line of
credit agreement requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants,
including limitations on the Company's ability to pay dividends. See Note 11 for
a discussion of warrants issued in conjunction with the line of credit and other
debt. In March 1999, the line of credit was increased to $4.0 million under
substantially similar terms and was amended to expire in March 2000.

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt at September 30, 1998 consisted of: (i) a $3.0 million
senior term loan facility; (ii) a $1.5 million subordinated promissory note; and
(iii) a $3.5 million subordinated promissory note. The subordinated promissory
notes are held by Comdisco. The proceeds from these obligations may be used for
equipment purchases and general corporate purposes.

The senior term loan facility bears interest at the lending bank's prime
rate less 1.0% (7.5% at September 30, 1998) and matures on February 15, 2001.
Payments are interest only through February 15, 1999. At February 15, 1999, the
outstanding balance under the facility will be paid in 24 equal monthly
principal payments, plus applicable interest. The loan is secured by a perfected
senior security interest in all non-leased assets of the Company with specific
filings for intellectual property (both the line of credit and senior term loan
were issued by the same lender and include the same financial covenants and
restrictions discussed above).

The subordinated promissory notes (which are subordinated to both the line
of credit and senior term loan) are secured by the Company's receivables,
equipment, general intangibles, inventory, and all other goods and personal
property of the Company. The $1.5 million note bears interest at 8.5%, has
principal and interest payments of

F-14
<PAGE> 95
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

5. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
approximately $38,000 due monthly, and matures in August 2001. The $3.5 million
note bears interest at 11.0%, has monthly principal and interest payments of
approximately $101,000 beginning in November 1998, and matures in April 2002.
The underlying debt agreement allows the Company to obtain additional long-term
borrowings of up to $1.5 million, at an interest rate of 12.5%. This commitment
by the lending institution expired on December 31, 1998.

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<S> <C>
Fiscal year ending September 30:
1999........................... $2,033
2000........................... 2,857
2001........................... 2,094
2002........................... 681
------
$7,665
======
</TABLE>

6. NOTES PAYABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS

In December 1996, the Company agreed to exchange two notes payable to
stockholders totaling $233,000, plus accrued interest, for 134,920 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock. At the time of the conversion to Series C Preferred
Stock, the outstanding balance of the notes plus accrued interest was $267,000.

7. COMMITMENTS

The Company leases office space and equipment under noncancelable operating
leases and capital leases. In October 1997, the Company signed a five-year lease
for a new corporate headquarters in Redmond, Washington, which commenced
February 1998. The Company has the option to extend the lease for one additional
five-year term. The Company is required to provide a $450,000 letter of credit
as security for the lease. The letter of credit may be reduced by specified
amounts in the lease agreement after 36 months or upon the Company's achieving
certain economic goals. In January and February 1998, the Company signed
two-year subleases for its former corporate headquarters.

F-15
<PAGE> 96
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

7. COMMITMENTS (CONTINUED)
Future minimum rental payments under noncancelable leases, net of the
future minimum rentals of $274,000 to be received under the subleases, are as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CAPITAL OPERATING
LEASES LEASES
------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Fiscal year ending September 30:
1999..................................... 1,234 883
2000..................................... 1,244 727
2001..................................... 1,036 754
2002..................................... 27 754
2003..................................... -- 276
------- ------
3,541 $3,394
======
Less amount representing interest.......... (410)
-------
Present value of net minimum capital lease
obligations.............................. 3,131
Less current portion....................... (1,004)
-------
Capital lease obligations, less current
portion.................................. $ 2,127
=======
</TABLE>

Total rent expense for the years ended September 30, 1996, 1997 and 1998
was $162,000, $254,000 and $1,055,000 respectively.

8. INCOME TAXES

The Company did not provide an income tax benefit for any period presented
because it has experienced operating losses since inception. At September 30,
1998, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of $19,142,000 and tax
credit carryforwards of $262,000, all of which expire between 2009 and 2013.

As a result of prior equity financings, the Company has incurred and will
incur "ownership changes" pursuant to applicable regulations in effect under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, the Company's use of net
operating loss carryforwards incurred through the date of these ownership
changes will be limited during the carryforward period. To the extent that any
single year loss is not utilized to the full amount of the limitation, such
unused loss is carried over to subsequent years until the earlier of its
utilization or the expiration of the relevant carryforward period.

F-16
<PAGE> 97
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

8. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------
1997 1998
------- -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards................. $ 3,410 6,508
Tax credit carryforwards......................... 152 262
Deferred revenues................................ 502 1,038
Expenses not currently deductible and other...... 630 947
------- -------
Total deferred tax assets................ 4,694 8,755
Valuation allowance................................ (4,694) (8,755)
------- -------
$ -- $ --
======= =======
</TABLE>

Since the Company's utilization of these deferred tax assets is dependent
on future profits, which are not assured, a valuation allowance equal to the net
deferred tax assets has been provided. The valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets increased approximately $2,635,000 and $4,061,000 during the years ended
September 30, 1997 and 1998.

9. STOCK OPTION PLANS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

The Company's 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "1994 Plan") provides for the
issuance of options to acquire 2,760,000 shares of common stock. The 1994 Plan
provides for the granting of incentive stock options to employees and
nonqualified stock options to employees, directors and other eligible
participants. Options granted under the 1994 Plan vest at variable rates,
typically four years, determined by the Board of Directors, and remain
exercisable for a period not to exceed ten years. At September 30, 1998, 354,768
shares were available for future grant.

On August 21, 1998, the Board adopted the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, the
Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Equity
Incentive Plan authorizes issuance of 3,240,000 shares of common stock upon the
exercise of stock options or otherwise pursuant to the plan. The Director Stock
Option Plan authorizes the issuance of 240,000 shares of common stock upon the
exercise of stock options that may be granted pursuant to the plan. The Employee
Stock Purchase Plan authorizes the issuance of 320,000 shares of Common Stock.
There were no options granted under these plans as of September 30, 1998.

F-17
<PAGE> 98
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

9. STOCK OPTION PLANS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (CONTINUED)
A summary of the Company's stock option activity under the 1994 Plan and
the options issued in exchange for options of 7Software and related weighted
average exercise prices is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
EXERCISE EXERCISE EXERCISE
OPTIONS PRICE OPTIONS PRICE OPTIONS PRICE
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at beginning of
period........................ 324,100 $ 0.11 622,879 $ 0.15 794,777 $0.16
Granted....................... 360,400 0.18 196,580 0.22 746,414 1.82
Issued in exchange for options
of 7Software................ -- -- -- -- 123,921 0.03
Exercised..................... (8,218) 0.13 (1,248) 0.18 (100,132) 0.13
Canceled...................... (53,403) 0.14 (23,434) 0.37 (25,459) 0.37
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at end of year.......... 622,879 0.15 794,777 0.15 1,539,521 0.95
========== ========== ==========
Exercisable at end of period.... 199,157 0.10 391,815 0.16 498,378 0.13
========== ========== ==========
Weighted average fair value of
options granted during the
period
Granted at fair value....... $0.18 $0.22 $10.73
Granted at below fair
value..................... -- -- 2.58
</TABLE>

Information regarding the weighted average remaining contractual life and
weighted average exercise price of options outstanding and options exercisable
at September 30, 1998 for selected exercise price ranges is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
--------------------------- --------------------
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE
RANGE OF CONTRACTUAL EXERCISE
EXERCISE PRICES LIFE (IN YEARS) SHARES SHARES PRICE
--------------- --------------- --------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ .03 - 0.20 7.22 776,882 493,180 $ 0.13
0.37 9.07 585,619 5,123 0.37
1.88 - 11.63 9.75 177,020 75 3.13
--------- ---------
$ 0.3 - 11.63 8.22 1,539,521 498,378 $ 0.13
========= =========
</TABLE>

During the three months ended December 31, 1998, common stock options for
797,265 shares were granted with a weighted average exercise price of $12.39;
options for 94,099 shares were exercised with a weighted average exercise price
of $0.09; and options for 14,394 shares were canceled with a weighted average
exercise price of $6.20; thereby resulting in 2,228,293 options outstanding at
December 31, 1998 with a weighted average exercise price of $5.05; of which
670,583 options were exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of
$0.19.

The Company uses the intrinsic value-based method to account for all its
employee stock-based compensation arrangements. Accordingly, no compensation
cost has been recognized for its stock options in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements because the fair value of the underlying common stock
equals or exceeds the exercise price of the stock options at the date of grant,
except with respect to certain options granted during the year ended September
30, 1998. The Company has recorded deferred stock

F-18
<PAGE> 99
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

9. STOCK OPTION PLANS AND EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (CONTINUED)
compensation expense of $861,000 relating to options granted during the year
ended September 30, 1998. This amount represents the difference between the
exercise price and the deemed fair value for financial reporting purposes of the
Company's common stock during the periods in which such options were granted.
Amortization of deferred stock compensation of $409,000 was recognized during
the year ended September 30, 1998.

The following pro forma information regarding stock-based compensation has
been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options
under the fair market value method of SFAS 123. The fair value of these options
was estimated at the date of grant using a minimum value option pricing model
with the following weighted average assumptions: risk-free interest rates range
from 5.5% to 6.5% in 1996, 1997, and 1998; a dividend yield rate of 0% for all
periods; and the options will be exercised one year after they vest.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting periods. The Company's
pro forma information is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------
1996 1997 1998
-------- -------- ---------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE
AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss as reported............................ $(4,953) $(5,524) $(18,074)
Incremental pro forma compensation expense under
SFAS 123...................................... (2) (7) (37)
------- ------- --------
Pro forma net loss.............................. $(4,955) $(5,531) $(18,111)
======= ======= ========
Pro forma loss per share........................ $ (2.17) $ (2.42) $ (7.47)
======= ======= ========
</TABLE>

Under SFAS 123, compensation expense representing the fair value of the
option grant is recognized over the vesting period. The initial impact on pro
forma net loss may not be representative of compensation expense in future
years, when the effect of amortization of multiple awards would be reflected in
pro forma earnings.

10. STOCKHOLDER NOTES RECEIVABLE

In October 1994, certain stockholders exercised options to purchase shares
of common stock. In connection with the issuance, the Company accepted
promissory notes totaling $80,000. These notes are due in October 1999 and bear
interest at the higher of 5% or the minimum interest rate required to avoid
implied interest under the Internal Revenue Code, payable annually. These notes
are full recourse and are secured by the common stock purchased with the
proceeds thereof.

F-19
<PAGE> 100
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

11. REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

In October 1994, the Company designated and issued 1,529,636 shares of
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series A Preferred Stock")
through a private offering. Net proceeds from the financing amounted to
$1,963,000.

In July 1995, the Company designated and issued 1,874,999 shares of Series
B redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") through a
private offering. Net proceeds from the financing amounted to $2,939,000.

In July 1996, the Company designated 3,909,920 shares and issued 3,750,000
shares of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series C Preferred
Stock") through a private offering. Net proceeds from the financing amounted to
$7,479,000. In December 1996, the Company agreed to issue an additional 134,920
shares of Series C Preferred Stock in exchange for the cancellation of notes
payable totaling $267,000.

In July 1997, the Company designated 1,343,159 shares and issued 1,275,338
shares of Series D redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series D Preferred
Stock") through a private offering. Net proceeds from the financing amounted to
$4,612,000.

In June 1998, the Company designated 1,800,000 shares and issued 1,003,499
shares of Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock ("Series E Preferred
Stock") through a private offering. In August 1998, the Series E Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") was amended for the sale of an
additional 645,161 shares of the Company's Series E Preferred Stock and Series E
Preferred Stock Warrants to purchase an additional 2,400,000 shares of Series E
Preferred Stock for $4,999,999 to American Express Travel Related Services
Company, Inc. ("TRS"). The total number of shares of Series E Preferred Stock
issued was 1,648,660. Total net proceeds from the Series E Preferred Stock
financing amounted to $12,698,000.

In connection with the initial public offering referred to in Note 19, all
redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into common
stock.

Following is a summary of terms and conditions for each series of
redeemable convertible preferred stock as of September 30, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ANNUAL
AGGREGATE DIVIDEND
SHARES STATED LIQUIDATION RATE --
OUTSTANDING VALUE VALUE NONCUMULATIVE
----------- ------ ----------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Issues and outstanding:
Series A.................... 1,529,636 $1.30 $ 2,000,000 $0.0915
Series B.................... 1,874,999 1.60 3,000,000 0.1120
Series C.................... 3,884,920 2.00 7,770,000 0.1400
Series D.................... 1,275,338 3.65 4,655,000 0.2550
Series E.................... 1,648,660 7.75 12,777,000 0.5425
---------- -----------
10,213,553 $30,202,000
========== ===========
</TABLE>

F-20
<PAGE> 101
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

11. REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS (CONTINUED)
Warrants to Purchase Preferred Stock

In May 1996, the Company issued warrants to purchase 28,125 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock in conjunction with a renewal and increase in the bank
line of credit (see Note 4). The warrants were immediately exercisable at a
price of $2.00 per share, expiring May 2001. The estimated fair value of these
warrants of $5,000 has been recorded as debt issuance costs. At the time of the
initial public offering, the warrants were exercised.

In July 1997, the Company issued warrants to Comdisco to purchase 44,827
and 22,988 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in conjunction with the Company's
receipt of financing commitments relating to the promissory note and lease
agreement, respectively (see Note 2). Each has a purchase price of $3.65 per
share. The warrants become immediately exercisable on the effective date of the
agreements and remain exercisable for a period of five years; or two years from
the effective date of the Company's initial public offering, whichever is
longer. The estimated fair values of these warrants of $30,000 and $16,000,
respectively, has been recorded as debt issuance costs.

In September 1997, the Company issued warrants to purchase 14,000 shares of
Series D Preferred Stock in conjunction with a new loan facility and an
increase/renewal in the bank line of credit (see Note 4). The warrants have an
initial exercise price of $3.65 per share, a five-year maturity inclusive of
certain provisions to include, but not limited by, a net exercise provision,
antidilution protection and a $30,000 put option. The right to exercise the put
option expires two years from the issue date of the warrants. The estimated fair
value of these warrants of $30,000 has been recorded as debt issuance costs. At
the time of the initial public offering, the warrants were exercised.

In April 1998, the Company issued warrants to purchase 13,187 shares of
Series E Preferred Stock in conjunction with the increase to the senior loan
facility (see Note 4). The warrants have an initial exercise price of $7.75 per
share. The warrants became immediately exercisable on the effective date of the
agreements and are exercisable for a period of five years. Additionally, the
agreement provides for a $75,000 put option, which expires in April 2000. The
estimated fair value of these warrants of $75,000 has been recorded as debt
issuance costs.

In May 1998, the Company issued warrants to Comdisco to purchase 56,451
shares of Series E Preferred Stock in conjunction with the new subordinated
promissory note (see Note 2). The warrants are immediately exercisable at a
price of $7.75 per share and are exercisable for a period of five years; or two
years from effective date of the Company's initial public offering, whichever is
longer. The estimated fair value of these warrants of $11,000 has been recorded
as debt issuance costs. Under the terms of this subordinated debt agreement, the
Company had an outstanding commitment to issue additional warrants to purchase
as many as 27,096 shares of Series E Preferred Stock at an exercise price of
$7.75 per share if it utilized the $1.5 million additional financing available
under the agreement. This commitment expired December 31, 1998 under the terms
of the agreement.

F-21
<PAGE> 102
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

11. REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANTS (CONTINUED)
In connection with the sale of an additional 645,161 shares of Series E
Preferred Stock, the Company issued a warrant to TRS and its assignees to
purchase an additional 2,400,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock. As all of
the shares of Series E Preferred Stock are converted into shares of common stock
in connection with the initial public offering of the Company's common stock,
this warrant will automatically be converted into common stock warrants
exercisable for 2,325,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The terms of the
warrant provide that it is exercisable in four tranches as follows: 300,000
shares may be acquired at the time of the Company's initial public offering at a
cash purchase price per share equal to the initial public offering price per
share less 7%; 700,000 shares may be acquired at any time on or before October
15, 1999 at a cash purchase price of $33.75 per share; 700,000 shares may be
acquired at any time on or before January 15, 2001 at a cash purchase price of
$50.63 per share; and the remaining 700,000 shares may be acquired at any time
on or before January 15, 2002 at a cash purchase price of $85.00 per share. As
was permitted by the warrant, the Company exercised its option to cancel 25% of
the shares that could have been acquired under the warrant at the time of the
initial public offering or on or before October 15, 1999. In connection with an
amendment to a standstill agreement with TRS, the Board of Directors
subsequently rescinded its 25% reduction in the number of shares that can be
acquired on or before October 15, 1999. At the time of the initial public
offering, the initial traunch of this warrant was exercised for 225,000 shares
of common stock. The estimated fair value of this warrant, determined based on a
Black Scholes fair value model, is approximately $278,000, which has been
recorded as redeemable convertible preferred stock warrants.

All preferred stock warrants automatically converted into common stock
warrants upon the closing of the initial public offering of the Company's common
stock.

F-22
<PAGE> 103
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

12. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

The Company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1998 1998
------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Outstanding stock options................. 1,539,521 2,228,293
Stock Options available for grant:
1994 Stock Option Plan............... 354,768 327,612
1998 Equity Incentive Plan........... 3,240,000 2,564,285
Director Stock Option Plan........... 240,000 160,000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.............. 320,000 320,000
Conversion of redeemable convertible
preferred stock:
Series A............................. 1,529,636 --
Series B............................. 1,875,000 --
Series C............................. 3,909,920 --
Series D............................. 1,343,158 --
Series E............................. 1,800,000 --
Warrants to purchase Series C Preferred
Stock that are convertible to common
stock................................... 28,125 --
Warrants to purchase Series D Preferred
Stock that are convertible to common
stock................................... 81,815 --
Warrants to purchase Series E Preferred
Stock that are convertible to common
stock................................... 2,219,638 --
Warrants to purchase common stock......... -- 2,237,454
---------- ---------
Total........................... 18,481,581 7,837,644
========== =========
</TABLE>

All of the shares of our common stock which remained available for issuance
under the 1994 Stock Option Plan when the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan became
effective, became available for issuance under the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan.

F-23
<PAGE> 104
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

13. NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net
loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Pro forma net
loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares used for
basic and diluted per share amounts and the weighted average convertible
redeemable preferred stock outstanding as if such shares were converted to
common stock at the time of issuance.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------- -------------------
1996 1997 1998 1997 1998
------- ------- -------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net loss........................ $(4,953) $(5,524) $(18,074) $ (2,283) $ (5,642)
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted net loss per
common share.................. $ (2.17) $ (2.41) $ (7.45) $ (.99) $ (1.01)
======= ======= ======== ======== ========
Weighted average number of
common shares used for basic
and diluted per share
amounts....................... 2,282 2,288 2,425 2,298 5,570
======= ======= -------- -------- --------
Weighted average common shares
issuable upon pro forma
conversion of preferred
stock......................... 8,994 8,565 8,398
-------- -------- --------
Weighted average number of
shares used for pro forma per
share amounts................. 11,419 10,863 13,968
======== ======== ========
Pro forma basic and diluted net
loss per share................ $ (1.58) $ (0.21) $ (0.40)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

Options to purchase 2,228,253 shares of common stock with exercise prices
of $0.03 to $12.50 per share and warrants to purchase 2,237,454 shares of common
stock at a range of $3.65 to $85.00 per share were outstanding at December 31,
1998. These options and warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted
earnings per share because their effect was anti-dilutive.

14. RETIREMENT 401(k) PLAN

The Company sponsors a 401(k) Profit Sharing and Trust Plan that is
available to substantially all employees. Each employee may elect to contribute
up to 20% of his or her pre-tax gross earnings, subject to annual limits. The
Company reserves the right to amend the Plan at any time. Employee contributions
to the Plan are subject to statutory limitations regarding maximum
contributions. There are no Company matching contributions.

F-24
<PAGE> 105
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

15. INTERNATIONAL REVENUES

The Company licenses and markets its products primarily in the United
States, and operates in a single industry segment. Information regarding
revenues in different geographic regions is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
REVENUES
---------------------------
COUNTRY 1996 1997 1998
------- ------ ------ -------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States.............................. $1,959 $6,981 $16,349
Europe..................................... -- 612 364
Canada..................................... -- 677 31
Australia.................................. -- -- 398
Asia....................................... -- -- 17
------ ------ -------
Total............................ $1,959 $8,270 $17,159
====== ====== =======
</TABLE>

From the inception of the Company to September 30, 1996, there were no
significant export sales or operations in countries outside of the United
States.

16. SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS

Strategic Marketing Alliance Agreement with American Express

In December 1997, the Company entered into a strategic alliance agreement
with American Express Company ("American Express"), a related party, under which
American Express refers to the Company its corporate charge card customers that
seek a T&E expense management software solution. Under the terms of the
agreement, American Express receives a fee for referring to the Company clients
of American Express who become XMS customers. The fee varies based upon
licensing revenue realized from referred customers. Except for the referral, the
Company is responsible for the entire sales effort and also for customer support
and warranty service. Under the agreement, the Company and American Express have
also agreed to develop certain product features enabling a higher level of
integration between XMS and certain American Express services and products.

Strategic Marketing Alliance Agreement with ADP, Inc.

In November 1998, the Company entered into a strategic alliance agreement
with ADP, Inc., a subsidiary of Automatic Data Processing, Inc., under which ADP
has agreed to refer potential customers for travel and entertainment expense
management software products and services exclusively to the Company. The
Company and ADP also agreed to jointly market the Company's travel and
entertainment expense report processing products and services to ADP customers.

Co-Branded XMS Service Marketing Agreement

In August 1998, the Company entered into a Co-Branded XMS Service Marketing
Agreement with American Express' affiliate TRS. Under the terms of the
agreement, TRS

F-25
<PAGE> 106
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

16. SIGNIFICANT AGREEMENTS (CONTINUED)
will receive a fee for marketing to TRS's clients a co-branded enterprise
service provider ("ESP") version of XMS containing special features. The
marketing fee is based on the amount of revenue received. The Company is
responsible for providing warranty and customer support services to these
customers. In addition, under the terms of the agreement, the Company and TRS
have agreed to jointly develop certain product features for integration into the
co-branded ESP version of XMS.

License and Other Agreements

The Company has entered into various agreements that allow the Company to
incorporate licensed technology into its products or that allow the Company the
right to sell separately the licensed technology. The Company incurs royalty
fees under these agreements that are based on a predetermined fee per license
sold. Royalty costs incurred under these agreements are recognized as products
are licensed and are included in cost of product sales. These amounts totaled
$203,000 and $348,000 for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1998,
respectively. Amounts recognized in 1996 were insignificant.

17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

During 1998 the Company paid fees of $121,000 to a stockholder and received
proceeds of $41,000 under the terms of a sales referral agreement. Additionally,
the Company recorded $134,000 in revenue for the sale of a license agreement to
another stockholder in 1998. No sales were made to stockholders or under the
sales referral agreement prior to 1998. At September 30, 1998 accounts
receivable from stockholders were $152,000 and accounts payable to stockholders
were $83,000. For the quarter ended December 31, 1998, the Company paid fees of
$55,000 and received proceeds totaling $219,000 under the terms of the sales
referral agreement. At December 31, 1998, accounts receivable from stockholders
was $0 and accounts payable to stockholders were $264,000.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Reverse Stock Split

On August 21, 1998 the Board of Directors authorized a reverse stock split
of the Company's common stock. The reverse split was approved for a range of
split ratios by the Stockholders in October 1998. The split ratio of 1-to-2.5
was determined on November 16, 1998. The reverse stock split was effected on
December 9, 1998. The related common share, preferred share and per share data
in the accompanying financial statements has been retroactively restated to
reflect the reverse stock split, including preferred share data on an
as-converted to common stock basis.

19. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING ("IPO") AND FOLLOW-ON OFFERING (UNAUDITED)

On December 16, 1998, the Company issued 3,365,000 shares of its Common
Stock (including 465,000 shares issued upon the exercise of the underwriters'
over allotment option) at an initial public offering price of $12.50 per share.
The net proceeds to the

F-26
<PAGE> 107
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(INFORMATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE MONTH PERIODS
ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1998 IS UNAUDITED.) (CONTINUED)

19. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING ("IPO") AND FOLLOW-ON OFFERING (UNAUDITED)
(CONTINUED)
Company from the offering, net of offering costs were approximately $37.4
million. In connection with the IPO, warrants were exercised to purchase 225,000
shares of common stock at a price of $11.625 per share, resulting in additional
proceeds to the Company totaling $2.6 million. Concurrent with the IPO, each
outstanding share of the Company's redeemable convertible preferred stock was
automatically converted into one share of Common Stock and remaining preferred
stock warrants for 2,237,454 shares were automatically converted into warrants
for the purchase of 2,237,454 shares of common stock.

On March 15, 1999, the Board of Directors authorized management to file a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to permit the
Company to execute a follow-on offering of its common stock to the public.

F-27
<PAGE> 108

REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
7Software, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of 7Software, Inc. (a
development stage company) as of December 31, 1997 and the related statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the period May 30, 1997
(date of incorporation) to December 31, 1997. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of 7Software, Inc. at December
31, 1997 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period May
30, 1997 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 1997 in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Seattle, Washington
August 14, 1998

F-28
<PAGE> 109

7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEET
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

ASSETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
1997 1998
------------ -----------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.......................... $25 $ 39
Accounts receivable................................ 12 36
--- -----
Total current assets....................... 37 75
Furniture and equipment, net......................... 21 28
--- -----
Total assets............................... $58 $ 103
=== =====
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable................................... $ 6 $ 4
Accrued payroll liabilities........................ 4 4
--- -----
Total current liabilities.................. 10 8
Convertible note payable............................. 25 130
Commitments
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value:
Authorized shares: 5,000,000
No shares issued and outstanding................ -- --
Common stock, no par value:
Authorized shares: 10,000,000
2,000,000 and 2,082,294 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 1997 and June 30,
1998, respectively............................ 20 212
Deferred stock compensation........................ -- (8)
Retained earnings (deficit)........................ 3 (239)
--- -----
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)....... 23 (35)
--- -----
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
(deficit)................................ $58 $ 103
=== =====
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-29
<PAGE> 110

7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE PERIOD
MAY 30, 1997 SIX MONTHS
(DATE OF INCORPORATION) ENDED
TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 JUNE 30, 1998
----------------------- -------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................... $66 $ 131
Cost of revenues............................ 5 25
--- -----
Gross profit................................ 61 106
Operating expenses:
Research and development.................. 30 213
Selling, general, and administration...... 27 135
--- -----
Total operating expenses.......... 57 348
--- -----
Income (loss) before taxes.................. 4 (242)
Provision for taxes......................... 1 --
--- -----
Net income (loss)................. $ 3 $(242)
=== =====
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-30
<PAGE> 111

7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE PERIOD MAY 30, 1997 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND FOR THE 6 MONTH UNAUDITED PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
TOTAL
COMMON STOCK DEFERRED RETAINED STOCKHOLDERS'
------------------- STOCK EARNINGS EQUITY
SHARES AMOUNT COMPENSATION (DEFICIT) (DEFICIT)
--------- ------ ------------ --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sale of common stock at
$0.01 per share for cash
on June 6, 1997......... 630,000 $ 6 $ -- $ 6
Issuance of common stock
at $0.01 per share
for furniture and
equipment at cost on
June 6, 1997......... 630,000 6 -- 6
Issuance of common stock
at $0.01 per share
for employee services
on June 6, 1997...... 740,000 8 -- 8
Net income.............. -- -- 3 3
--------- ---- ---- ----- -----
Balance at December 31,
1997.................... 2,000,000 $ 20 $ 3 $ 23
Issuance of common stock
(unaudited).......... 12,632 1 -- 1
Issuance of common stock
on conversion of
notes payable
(unaudited).......... 69,662 100 -- 100
Net loss (unaudited).... -- (242) (242)
Deferred stock
compensation
(unaudited).......... -- 91 (91) --
Amortization of deferred
stock compensation
(unaudited).......... -- -- 83 83
--------- ---- ---- ----- -----
Balance at June 30, 1998
(unaudited)............. 2,082,294 $212 (8) $(239) $ (35)
========= ==== ==== ===== =====
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-31
<PAGE> 112

7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE PERIOD
MAY 30, 1997
(DATE OF
INCORPORATION) SIX MONTHS ENDED
TO DECEMBER 31, 1997 JUNE 30, 1998
-------------------- ----------------
(UNAUDITED)
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)........................... $ 3 $(242)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation.............................. 1 2
Stock compensation........................ 8 83
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable.................... (12) (24)
Accounts payable and accrued payroll
liabilities.......................... 10 (2)
---- -----
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities................................ 10 (183)
---- -----
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of furniture and equipment........ (16) (9)
---- -----
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of common stock...... 6 1
Proceeds from convertible note payable...... 25 75
Proceeds from convertible note payable to
Concur.................................... 130
---- -----
Net cash provided by financing activities... 31 206
---- -----
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents... 25 14
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period.................................... -- 25
---- -----
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period.................................... $ 25 $ 39
==== =====
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES
Furniture and equipment contributed for
common stock.............................. $ 6 --
==== =====
Issuance of common stock in consideration
for conversion of note payable............ -- $ 100
==== =====
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-32
<PAGE> 113

7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD MAY 30, 1997 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO JUNE 30, 1998
(INFORMATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Activities

7Software, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated in California on May 30,
1997. The Company performs consulting services for product development and
developed a product called CompanyStore that automates the purchasing of
nonproduction goods. CompanyStore runs on corporate intranets, providing access
to company-specific information and making that information available on
employee desktops throughout the enterprise. The Company is in the development
stage.

On June 30, 1998, the Company merged with Concur Technologies, Inc.
("Concur"). The merger resulted in all shares of the Company's outstanding
capital stock and all stock options being converted into Concur common stock and
stock options, respectively.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The financial information for the six months ended June 30, 1998 is
unaudited but includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of its
financial position at such date and its operating results and cash flows for
that period. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 1998 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for an entire year.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenues from performing computer programming
consulting. Revenue is recognized by the Company based upon hours of consulting
performed and billable, in accordance with the related consulting agreement.

Cash Equivalents

All short-term investments with maturities of three months or less at date
of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.

Development Costs

All software development costs are expensed until technological feasibility
has been established. No software development costs were capitalized during the
period ended December 31, 1997 or June 30, 1998.

Advertising and Marketing Costs

Costs of marketing materials and advertising expenditures are charged to
operations when the materials are used or the advertising is first released.
Advertising costs were $5,000 for the period ended December 31, 1997 and $17,000
for the six months ended June 30, 1998.

F-33
<PAGE> 114
7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
FOR THE PERIOD MAY 30, 1997 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO JUNE 30, 1998
(INFORMATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Federal Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." Under
Statement No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded using the
liability method, which recognizes the effect of temporary differences between
the reporting of revenues and expenses for financial statement and income tax
return purposes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25") and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, no
compensation expense is recorded when the exercise price of employee stock
options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation."

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts recorded in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from
two to four years.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following: (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
1997 1998
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Computer equipment........... $20 $20
Furniture, fixtures, and
equipment.................. 2 12
--- ---
22 32
Accumulated depreciation..... (1) (4)
--- ---
$21 $28
=== ===
</TABLE>

F-34
<PAGE> 115
7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
FOR THE PERIOD MAY 30, 1997 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO JUNE 30, 1998
(INFORMATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)

3. CONVERTIBLE NOTES

On November 30, 1997, the Company entered into an agreement to receive
$75,000 in consideration of a non-interest bearing convertible note. The terms
of this agreement were such that the entire balance of the note was convertible
into securities sold in the Company's first stock financing with outside
investors after the date thereof. Additionally, the agreement provided that the
note holder would receive warrants to purchase common stock if and when the
Company received additional equity financing. The Company received $25,000 of
the $75,000 note in December 1997 and the remaining balance during the first
quarter of 1998. On January 1, 1998, the Company entered into another agreement
and received $25,000 in consideration of a non-interest bearing convertible note
with similar terms to those as described above. On June 9, 1998, the note
holders and the Company agreed to convert the notes in exchange for the issuance
of 69,662 shares of common stock. As a result of this transaction, the note
holders' rights to the warrants were cancelled.

4. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

On June 6, 1997, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the
founders of the Company. The shares were issued for $20,000 of consideration,
which included cash, furniture and equipment, and services rendered since the
incorporation of the Company.

On June 9, 1998, the Company issued 69,662 shares of common stock to
certain note holders in exchange for the cancellation of the convertible notes
and the obligations of issuing warrants as discussed in Note 3.

Between January 1, 1998 and June 10, 1998, the Company issued 12,632 shares
of common stock. The shares were issued for approximately $1,000 in cash and
services rendered during this period.

5. STOCK OPTION PLAN

The Company's 1997 Stock Option Plan authorizes the grant of options to
employees, directors, and eligible participants for up to 500,000 shares of the
Company's common stock. The term of options granted to certain significant
stockholders cannot exceed five years while the term of all other options cannot
exceed ten years. The options vest over periods defined in each option agreement
as determined at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors. Stock
options that qualify as incentive stock options are exercisable at not less than
the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant, and nonqualified stock
options are exercisable at prices determined at the discretion of the Board of
Directors, which may not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the stock
at the date of grant. No options had been granted under the plan as of December
31, 1997. For the period May 30, 1997 to June 30, 1998, the Company issued
364,000 options to purchase common stock at $0.01 per share resulting in
deferred stock compensation of approximately $91,000 which is being amortized
over the vesting period of the options of generally four years. Stock
compensation expense was $83,000 for the six months ended June 30, 1998.

F-35
<PAGE> 116
7SOFTWARE, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
FOR THE PERIOD MAY 30, 1997 (DATE OF INCORPORATION) TO JUNE 30, 1998
(INFORMATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 IS UNAUDITED)

6. INCOME TAXES

Temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and
liabilities to December 31, 1997 were insignificant; therefore no deferred taxes
were provided. Significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets were
as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31, JUNE 30,
1997 1998
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax asset relating to net $ -- $ 52
operating loss credit carry-forward....
Valuation allowance...................... -- (52)
---- ----
$ -- $ --
==== ====
</TABLE>

Since the Company was acquired by Concur on June 30, 1998 it will not
utilize its deferred tax assets; therefore, a valuation allowance for the full
amount of all deferred tax assets has been provided.

7. COMMITMENTS

The Company leased its facility under an operating lease that expired on
June 30, 1998. Total rental expense for the period ended December 31, 1997 and
June 30, 1998 were $4,000 and $24,000, respectively.

8. SALES TO MAJOR CUSTOMERS

All revenues recognized by the Company for the period ended December 31,
1997 were received from SAP Technology for computer programming consulting. For
the six months ended June 30, 1998, all revenues were received for sales and
services provided to two customers.

F-36
<PAGE> 117

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(FORMERLY PORTABLE SOFTWARE CORPORATION)

PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

The following financial statements present the Concur Technologies, Inc.
("Concur," formerly Portable Software Corporation) Pro Forma Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the year ended September 30, 1998.

The Company's acquisition of 7Software, Inc. ("7Software") has been
accounted for under the "purchase" method of accounting, which requires the
purchase price to be allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities of
7Software on the basis of their estimated fair values as of the date of
acquisition. The following pro forma consolidated statements of operations for
the year ended September 30, 1998 give effect to the acquisition of 7Software as
if it occurred on October 1, 1997, and include adjustments directly attributable
to the acquisition of 7Software and expected to have a continuing impact on the
combined company (collectively, the "Pro Forma Financial Statements"). As the
Pro Forma Financial Statements have been prepared based on estimated fair
values, amounts actually recorded may change upon determination of the total
purchase price (which may change based on future performance) and additional
analysis of individual assets and liabilities assumed.

The pro forma information is based on historical financial statements. The
pro forma results of operations for the year ended September 30, 1998 includes
the results of operations of 7Software from May 30, 1997 (Date of Incorporation)
to June 30, 1998. The assumptions give effect to the business combination with
7Software under the purchase method of accounting. The information has been
prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Commission and is
provided for comparative purposes only. The pro forma information does not
purport to be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had
the combination been effected at the beginning of the periods presented.

F-37
<PAGE> 118

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PURCHASE PRO FORMA
CONCUR 7SOFTWARE ADJUSTMENTS CONSOLIDATED
----------- ---------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Total revenues, net....... $ 17,159 $ 197 $ -- $ 17,356
Cost of revenues.......... 6,242 30 174 6,446
----------- ---------- ------- -----------
Gross profit.............. 10,917 167 (174) 10,910

Sales and marketing....... 12,353 162 33 12,548
Research and
development............. 6,434 243 33 6,710
General and
administrative.......... 4,687 -- -- 4,687
Acquired in-process
technology.............. 5,203 -- (5,203) --
----------- ---------- ------- -----------
Total operating
expense...... 28,677 405 (5,137) 23,945
----------- ---------- ------- -----------
Loss from operations...... (17,760) (238) 4,963 (13,035)
Other expense............. (314) (1) -- (315)
----------- ---------- ------- -----------
Net loss........ $ (18,074) $ (239) $ 4,963 $ (13,350)
=========== ========== ======= ===========
Pro forma net loss per
share................... $ (1.58) $ (1.14)
=========== ===========
Weighted average shares
used in computation of
basic and diluted net
loss per share.......... 11,419 11,675
=========== ===========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes.

F-38
<PAGE> 119

CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

On June 30, 1998, the Company acquired 7Software, Inc. ("7Software").
7Software was incorporated in May 1997 and focused on the development and
licensing of Internet-based procurement solutions that bring purchasing to the
desktops of employees of large corporations. Concurrent with this transaction,
7Software was merged into the Company.

The unaudited pro forma information presented is not necessarily indicative
of future consolidated results of operations of Concur or the consolidated
results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition taken place
on October 1, 1997. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of
operations for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1998 reflect the effects
of the acquisition, assuming the related events occurred as of October 1, 1997
for the purposes of the unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of
operations.

2. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements reflect the
conversion of all the outstanding shares of 7Software common stock into 708,918
shares and stock options to purchase 123,921 shares of Concur common stock
pursuant to the acquisition. This consideration resulted in a total purchase
price of $6.2 million (including acquisition expenses).

The allocation of the purchase price resulted in intangible assets,
primarily capitalized technology and the value of an acquired workforce, of
$960,000 which are being amortized on a straight line basis over three years.
In-process research and development acquired and valued using the income
approach in the amount of $5,203,000 was charged to expense. In-process research
and development charges have not been reflected in the pro forma consolidated
financial statements of operations for the year ended September 30, 1998 as they
are considered a nonrecurring charge.

3. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED NET LOSS PER SHARE

The net loss per share and shares used in computing the net loss per share
for the year ended September 30, 1998 is based upon the historical weighted
average common shares outstanding adjusted to reflect the issuance, as of
October 1, 1997 of approximately 708,918 shares and stock options to purchase
123,921 shares of Concur common stock as described in Note 2 to these Notes to
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements. Options to purchase
approximately 364,000 shares of 7Software common stock were assumed by Concur
pursuant to the acquisition and converted into options to purchase approximately
123,921 shares of Concur common stock. The Concur common stock issuable upon the
exercise of the stock options have been excluded as the effect would be
antidilutive. In addition to the shares used in computing the net income (loss)
per share above, pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share is calculated
using the weighted average convertible and redeemable preferred stock
outstanding as if such shares were converted to common stock at the time of
issuance.

On August 21, 1998, Concur's Board of Directors authorized a reverse stock
split. The split ratio of 1-to-2.5 was determined on November 16, 1998. Share
and per share data included in these pro forma statements have been
retroactively restated to reflect the reverse stock split.

F-39
<PAGE> 120
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

4. PURCHASE ADJUSTMENTS

Pro forma adjustments have been prepared to reflect the elimination of the
non-recurring one-time charge for acquired in-process technology and to reflect
the amortization of capitalized technology and other intangible assets.

F-40
<PAGE> 121
DESCRIPTION OF GRAPHICS

INSIDE FRONT COVER
Graphic:
Concur logo. A large Concur logo without the words "Concur-TM TECHNOLOGIES" and
without the box in the center of the circle, which is replaced by the text
below.

Text:
Concur Technologies is a leading provider of Web-based employee-facing
applications.

Envision a workplace where manual, paper-based processes are not only automated
throughout the enterprise, but also extend to partners, vendors and to service
providers. Concur Technologies provides travel and entertainment expense
management and procurement solutions that enable organizations to work more
efficiently and increase employee productivity. The Company leverages Intranet
technology to deploy such applications quickly and on an enterprise-wide basis.
The Company also plans to leverage the public Internet infrastructure to offer
its solutions to a broad range of businesses as an Enterprise Service Provider.

Concur Technologies' mission is to be the dominant Web-based integrated solution
provider of employee-facing business applications throughout the extended
enterprise.

GATEFOLD

Graphic:
Box divided into 4 vertical sections and one horizontal section on the top. Next
to the first vertical section is a screen shot of Employee Desktop. The next
four are headed by "Preparation," "Approval," "Processing" and "Data Analysis
and Reporting," respectively. There are pictures of nine screen shots showing
various stages of the software. The top four screen shots describe CompanyStore
and the bottom four describe XMS. The top horizontal section includes the Concur
logo on the left and text on the right.

Text:
Right of Concur logo:

Concur products automate the preparation, approval, processing and data analysis
of travel and entertainment expense reports and procurement requisitions, using
a single user interface. By automating manual paper-based processes, customers
can reduce costs and collect and analyze data to consolidate purchases with
preferred vendors and to negotiate vendor discounts.

Under first vertical:

Employee Desktop gives employees instant access to expense reporting and
procurement applications, as well as status updates, frequently asked questions
and helpful tips about the applications.

Under "Preparation":

[CompanyStore logo]

Using CompanyStore's simple user interface, orders are placed on-line through a
customized electronic catalog.

[XMS logo]

Expense Reports are easily prepared using a checkbook-style user interface and
are prepopulated with corporate charge card data.

Under "Approval":

CompanyStore allows the enterprise to determine how the requisitions should be
processed.

XMS allows the enterprise to determine the approval process and automatically
flags those reports that are not in compliance.

Under "Processing":

CompanyStore saves time by integrating with the enterprise's ERP system,
allowing orders to be entered into the purchasing system automatically and then
forwarded electronically to the vendor.

XMS integrates with existing IT infrastructure and ERP applications and has
features such as electronic flagging of non-compliant expenses that greatly
reduce the time and cost of processing expense reports.

Under "Data Analysis and Reporting":

Better data allows managers to determine how best to control costs, negotiate
more favorable supplier arrangements and consolidate vendors.

Provides access to expense trends and data, allowing consolidation of vendors
and negotiation of vendor discounts.

<PAGE> 122
PAGE 47

This graphic depicts the interconnection of various systems. A box with four
divisions, captioned "Concur Applications," appears at the top. The top division
contains the Employee Desktop logo and the bottom three divisions contain the
XMS logo, the CompanyStore logo and "Future Applications" in text. A box with
eight divisions, captioned "Concur Common Technology Platform," appears below
the "Concur Applications" box. The eight divisions contain the text captions
"Prepopulation," "Workflow/Routing," "Business Intelligence," "Security,"
"Messaging," "Business Rules," "User Management," and "Database." A box with
five divisions, captioned "ERP Platforms," appears below the "Concur Technology
Platform" box. The five divisions contain the text captions "SAP," "Oracle,"
"PeopleSoft," "Others" and "Legacy Systems." A box with four divisions,
captioned "E-Commerce," appears to the right of the other three boxes. The four
divisions contain the text captions "Travel Services," "Corporate Charge Card
Suppliers," "Vendors & Suppliers" and "Financial Institutions." "Concur Common
Technology Platform" and "Concur Applications" have three double-ended arrows
pointing to each other. "Concur Technology Platform" and "E-Commerce" have a
double-ended arrow pointing to each other. "Concur Technology Platform" and "ERP
Platforms" have five double-ended arrows pointing to each other.

INSIDE BACK COVER

Graphic: Three screen shots, one of an Employee Desktop page, one of a
CompanyStore page, and one of an XMS page. The Employee Desktop, CompanyStore
and XMS logos appear next to the corresponding screen shots. A large Concur logo
without the words "Concur-TM TECHNOLOGIES" in the center of the circle.

Text:

Top of page titled: Concur's Employee Desktop Suite.

Employee Desktop-TM integrates our employee-facing applications and provides a
business portal through which corporate customers can deliver information and
services to their employees.

CompanyStore-TM is an Intranet application for the procurement of goods and
services that reduces processing costs and enables customers to consolidate
purchases with preferred vendors.

The Xpense Management Solution-TM is the market leading travel expense
automation product.

BACK COVER
Graphic:
Concur logo with shadow. Dark background.

<PAGE> 123

LOGO