AFFINITY INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SYSTEMS INC
S-1/A, EX-5.1, 2000-06-06
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
Previous: AFFINITY INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SYSTEMS INC, S-1/A, 2000-06-06
Next: AFFINITY INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL SYSTEMS INC, S-1/A, EX-23.1, 2000-06-06



<PAGE>






                                   EXHIBIT 5.1


<PAGE>


Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
June 6, 2000
Page 1





                                                              June 6, 2000



Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
100 Second Avenue South
Suite 1100S
St. Petersburg, FL 33701-4301

RE:   REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 OF AFFINITY INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL
      SYSTEMS, INC.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have acted as counsel to Affinity International Travel Systems,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the preparation
and filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of a Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (the "Registration Statement") pursuant to which the
Company is registering for resale by certain of the Company's stockholders (the
"Selling Stockholders") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), a total of 20,353,094 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, of the
Company (the "Common Stock"). Of the 20,353,094 shares of Common Stock being
registered for resale by the Selling Stockholders, 10,413,094 shares are
currently outstanding (the "Shares") and 9,940,000 shares are being registered
for resale by the Selling Stockholders upon the exercise of outstanding warrants
to purchase 9,940,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock in private
transactions. This opinion is being rendered in connection with the filing of
the Registration Statement.

         This firm, in rendering legal opinions, customarily makes certain
assumptions which are described in Schedule A hereto. In the course of our
representation of the Company in connection with preparation of the Registration
Statement, nothing has come to our attention which causes us to believe reliance
upon any of those assumptions is inappropriate, and the opinions hereafter
expressed are based upon those assumptions.

         In connection with this opinion, we have examined only the following
documents (collectively, the "Documents"):

          (i)  the Registration Statement;

          (ii) the Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended,
               incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration
               Statement;


<PAGE>


Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
June 6, 2000
Page 2


         (iii) Certificate of the Secretary of the State of Nevada dated April
               19, 2000, as to the good standing of the Company, as to which we
               relied exclusively;

          (iv) the Bylaws of the Company incorporated by reference as Exhibit
               3.2 to the Registration Statement;

          (v)  the corporate minute books and other records of the Company;

          (vi) certain proceedings of the directors of the Company and other
               records of the Company pertaining to the Shares;

         (vii) a specimen certificate for the Common Stock incorporated by
               reference as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement;

        (viii) a form of common stock purchase warrant; (ix) a certificate of
               the Secretary of the Company; and

          (x)  a letter from Interwest Transfer, Inc., the Company's transfer
               agent, dated June 6 , 2000 as to the number of issued and
               outstanding shares of the Company as of the date of the letter.


         The opinions expressed herein are based solely upon (i) our review of
the Documents, (ii) discussions with Daniel G. Brandano, the Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Company, Gerard J. LaMontagne, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, and Mark S. Mandula, the Chief Operating Officer of the
Company, (iii) discussions with those of our attorneys who have devoted
substantive attention to the matters contained herein, and (iv) such review of
published sources of law as we have deemed necessary.

         For purposes of our opinions contained herein, we have assumed with
your concurrences that the laws of the State of Nevada are identical to the laws
of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

         Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
Shares are and the Warrant Shares, when issued and paid for in accordance with
the applicable common stock purchase warrant, will be duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We understand that this opinion is to be used in connection with the
Registration Statement. We consent to the filing of this opinion as an Exhibit
to said Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm wherever it
appears in the Registration Statement, including the prospectus constituting a
part thereof and any amendments thereto. This opinion may be used in


<PAGE>


Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
June 6, 2000
Page 3


connection with the offering of the Common Stock only while the Registration
Statement, as it may be amended from time to time, remains in effect.

                          Very truly yours,

                          BROWN, RUDNICK, FREED & GESMER
                          By: BROWN, RUDNICK, FREED & GESMER, P.C.


                          By:    /s/ John G. Nossiff, Jr.
                                 ------------------------------
                                 John G. Nossiff, Jr., A Member
                                 Duly Authorized

JGN/SRL/MSG


<PAGE>


Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
June 6, 2000
Page 4


                                   SCHEDULE A

                         BROWN, RUDNICK, FREED & GESMER
                              STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS


         For purposes of this opinion, Brown, Rudnick, Freed & Gesmer makes the
following customary assumptions, without any investigation:

          1.   each natural person executing any of the Documents has sufficient
               legal capacity to enter into such Documents and perform the
               transactions contemplated thereby;

          2.   the Company holds requisite title and rights to any property
               involved in the transactions described in the Documents and
               purported to be owned by it;

          3.   the full power and authority of each entity and person other than
               the Company to execute, deliver and perform each document
               heretofore executed and delivered or hereafter to be executed and
               delivered and to do each other act heretofore done or hereafter
               to be done by such entity or person;

          4.   the due execution and delivery by each entity or person other
               than the Company of each document heretofore executed and
               delivered or hereafter to be executed and delivered by such
               entity or person;

          5.   the legality, validity, binding effect and enforceability as to
               each entity or person other than the Company of each document
               heretofore executed and delivered or hereafter to be executed and
               delivered and of each other act heretofore done or hereafter to
               be done by such entity or person;

          6.   the genuineness of each signature on, and the completeness,
               accuracy, and authenticity of each document submitted to us as an
               original;

          7.   the conformity to the original, completeness, accuracy, and
               authenticity of each document submitted to us as a copy;

          8.   the completeness, accuracy and proper indexing of all
               governmental and judicial records searched;

          9.   no modification of any provision of any document, no waiver of
               any right or remedy and no exercise of any right or remedy other
               than in a commercially reasonable and conscionable manner and in
               good faith;

          10.  the conduct of the parties to the transactions described in the
               Documents has complied in the past and will comply in the future
               with any requirement of good faith, fair dealing and
               conscionability;


<PAGE>


Affinity International Travel Systems, Inc.
June 6, 2000
Page 5



          11.  each person other than the Company has acted in good faith and
               without notice of any defense against the enforcement of any
               rights created by, or adverse claim to any property or security
               interest transferred or created as part of, the transactions
               described in the Documents; and

          12.  there has not been any mutual mistake of fact or
               misunderstanding, fraud, duress, or undue influence by or among
               any of the parties to the Documents.





© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission