PRICELINE COM INC
8-K, 1999-10-14
COMPUTER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DESIGN
Previous: CATHOLIC FUNDS INC, 497K1, 1999-10-14
Next: NETGATEWAY INC, S-1/A, 1999-10-14




                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 8-K

                               CURRENT REPORT

   Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

     Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 13, 1999


                         priceline.com Incorporated
           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


    Delaware                       0-25581                   06-1528493
(State or other Jurisdiction   (Commission File Number)    (IRS Employer
    of Incorporation)                                      Identification No.)


             Five High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut     06905
                  (Address of principal office)            (zip code)


                               (203) 705-3000
             Registrant's telephone number, including area code


                                    N/A
    (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)






ITEM 5.    OTHER EVENTS.


      On October 13, 1999, priceline.com Incorporated, a Delaware
corporation ("priceline.com"), announced that it had filed suit in U.S.
District Court against Microsoft Corporation and its Expedia Inc.
subsidiary, claiming that Expedia.com's recently introduced hotel service
infringes on priceline.com's U.S. Patent #5,794,207. The suit also charges
that Microsoft's conduct is in violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade
Practices Act. The priceline.com suit is seeking declaratory relief,
permanent injunctive relief and actual and punitive damages. The
information set forth in this paragraph is qualified in its entirety by
reference to a press release issued by priceline.com on October 13, 1999, a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by
reference.


ITEM 7.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND EXHIBITS.

           (c)   Exhibits.


           99.1     Press Release issued by priceline.com on October 13, 1999.



                                 SIGNATURES


      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                              PRICELINE.COM INCORPORATED


                              By:  /s/ Paul E. Francis
                                  ------------------------
                                  Name:  Paul E. Francis
                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer


Date:  October 14, 1999



                               EXHIBIT INDEX


 Exhibit No.   Description
 -----------   -----------

  99.1         Press Release issued by priceline.com on October
               13, 1999.







                       Priceline.com Sues Microsoft
                          For Patent Infringement


      STAMFORD, Conn., October 13, 1999 . . . Priceline.com (Nasdaq: PCLN)
 today filed suit in U.S. District Court against Microsoft Corporation and
 its Expedia Inc. subsidiary, claiming that Expedia.com's recently
 introduced hotel service infringes on priceline.com's U.S. Patent
 #5,794,207.  The suit also charges that Microsoft's conduct
 is in violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act.

 The priceline.com suit is seeking declaratory relief, permanent injunctive
 relief and actual and punitive damages.

 Priceline.com currently holds three U.S. patents covering its buyer-driven
 commerce system and related elements -  U.S. Patents #5,794,207, #5,797,127
 and #5,897,620. The company's patent portfolio includes 17 pending U.S.
 patent applications covering a broad range of priceline.com's proprietary
 processes and systems dating back to 1996.

 In addition to charging willful infringement of U.S. Patent #5,794,207,
 priceline.com's complaint explains how, over an eight month period,
 Microsoft sought - and was provided with - detailed confidential
 information and technical data regarding priceline.com.  Over that period,
 during which nondisclosure agreements were entered into, the two companies
 sought to structure a mutually beneficial business relationship, including
 possible joint marketing programs and licensing of priceline.com's
 intellectual property.  In a series of meetings, all apparently for
 legitimate business purposes, Microsoft executives asked for, and
 priceline.com's senior management and technical staff provided them with, a
 variety of confidential information.

 The meetings between priceline.com and Microsoft included a face-to-face
 discussion between priceline.com founder and Vice Chairman Jay Walker and
 Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Greg Maffei, who is currently chairman of
 Expedia Inc.  That discussion, which covered a potential Microsoft
 investment in priceline.com immediately prior to priceline.com's March 1999
 IPO, ultimately broke off when priceline.com would not provide Microsoft
 with prices on its shares below the initial public offering price.

                                   (more)


 Meetings continued, in what priceline.com thought was good-faith, as the
 two parties explored a number of mutually beneficial ways to work together.
 In the summer of 1999, the question of business partnerships was also part
 of a face-to-face discussion between Mr. Walker and Microsoft Chairman Bill
 Gates.   During that conversation, Mr.Gates surprised Mr. Walker by
 informing him that Microsoft had no intention of allowing patent rights to
 stand in its way.  Mr. Gates went on to say that many other companies were
 suing Microsoft for patent infringement and that priceline.com could, in
 effect, get in line.  A few weeks following the discussion between Mr.
 Gates and Mr. Walker, Microsoft launched Expedia's Hotel Price Matcher
 service, which directly infringes priceline.com's '207 patent.

 "Patents are the legal safeguard that companies utilize when they create
 new processes, systems and services," said Evan R. Chesler, Esq., head of
 the litigation department of Cravath, Swaine & Moore and lead attorney for
 priceline.com in its suit.  "Patents encourage innovation and investment by
 preventing companies from simply copying the intellectual property of
 others, thereby unfairly benefiting from their investment and innovation.
 The patent system, which has benefited American consumers for over 200
 years, was created to prevent what happened here.  The law provides a clear
 and powerful means to correct this type of unfair competition.

 "Microsoft's conduct is especially egregious in light of the fact that it
 led priceline.com to believe that it wanted to develop a cooperative
 relationship between the two companies.  Microsoft did not tell
 priceline.com that its intention was to copy priceline.com's business and
 infringe its patent rights.  Rather, Microsoft indicated that it was
 seriously exploring a co-marketing arrangement or assisting priceline.com
 in technical aspects of its computer system.  Even after Mr. Gates told Mr.
 Walker that Microsoft would not let priceline.com's intellectual property
 rights stand in its way, it was hard to believe that Microsoft would really
 act in that manner.  Then, of course, its copycat hotel service was
 launched," Chesler continued.

 "Priceline.com invested years of time and money to develop a successful
 business model and build a patent portfolio around it," said Richard S.
 Braddock, priceline.com's chairman and CEO.  "The company raised over
 $100,000,000 of private capital to introduce its novel system to the
 marketplace and expand its business.  Millions of consumers have benefited
 from priceline.com's innovation and investment."


                                   (more)

 "Unfair competitive practices and disregard for intellectual property have
 no place in corporate America," added Braddock.  "When Microsoft first
 announced its Hotel Price Matcher copycat service we were, quite frankly,
 stunned by its blatant disregard for our prior relationship and our
 property rights.  We believe that Microsoft was well aware or our success
 as priceline.com's innovation and investment generated tremendous consumer
 response.  In our first year of operation, priceline.com built the second
 most-recognized e-commerce brand on the Internet, with an overall awareness
 for our travel products six times greater than Expedia (108.6 million
 adults for priceline.com vs. 17.8 million adults for Expedia.com) despite
 the fact that Expedia.com had been in the market twice as long as us.
 Priceline.com's success in saving money for millions of consumers using a
 unique business approach has validated our innovative method of pricing."

 "During the second quarter of 1999, following our IPO, priceline.com's
 business began to scale rapidly.  We experienced our first $100 million-
 plus revenue quarter, passed the 2,000,000 customer mark, and had leisure
 airline ticket sales that grew more than 1,000% over the same quarter in
 1998," Braddock continued, "Notably, in the face of this success, it was
 during the summer of 1999 when Mr. Walker and Mr. Gates had their
 conversation regarding priceline.com's intellectual property rights.
 Shortly thereafter, Microsoft's copycat hotel service was launched."

 Chesler concluded, "It is ironic that Microsoft has taken these actions in
 light of the fact that much of Microsoft's business is premised on its
 ability to protect its own intellectual property rights, through
 copyrights, patents and other means.  Microsoft is a large and successful
 company, but no one -- not even Microsoft -- is above the law.  Microsoft
 has no right simply to take and use the intellectual property of others.
 Priceline.com will assert its rights forcefully in court."


 Priceline.com's legal team includes some of the country's foremost patent
 experts and litigators.  They are:

 Evan R. Chesler                              Cravath, Swaine & Moore
 ---------------                              -----------------------
 Mr. Chesler is a partner in Cravath, Swaine & Moore and heads the firm's
 litigation department.  A noted trial lawyer, Mr. Chesler is currently
 handling patent suits for, in addition to priceline.com, Alcoa, Cummins
 Engine and IBM.  He has also represented, or is currently representing,
 Bristol-Myers Squibb, Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette, DuPont, Ross Perot, Time
 Warner and United Technologies, among others.

                                   (more)

 Roger S. Smith                               Morgan & Finnegan
 --------------                               -----------------
 Mr. Smith is counsel to the firm of Morgan & Finnegan.  Before joining the
 firm, he was assistant general counsel, intellectual property law, for IBM.
 Mr. Smith practiced patent law for IBM and its business units for 30 years
 before retiring in 1994.  In 1991, he served as technical advisor to the
 U.S. delegation to WIPO World Patent Harmonization Treaty negotiations.
 During that same period, he served as a member of the Commerce Secretary's
 Advisory Commission on Patent Law Reform.

 Mari M. Shaw                                 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
 ------------                                 -----------------------
 Ms. Shaw is a partner in the Litigation Section of Morgan, Lewis and
 Bockius.  She has acted as lead counsel in litigating a variety of patent,
 trade secret, trademark, licensing and unfair competition disputes.  She is
 a founder and trustee of the National Patent Board, an industry driven
 alternative dispute resolution forum.  She also serves as a mediator for
 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

                                    ###

 For press information, contact:
 Brian Ek at priceline.com 203-705-3026 ([email protected])
 Mike Darcy at priceline.com 203-705-3331 ([email protected])


 This press release may contain forward-looking statements which are made
 pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
 Reform Act of 1995.  Expressions of future goals and similar expressions
 including, without limitation, "may," "will," "believes," "should,"
 "could," "hope," "expects," "expected," "does not currently expect,"
 "anticipates," "predicts," "potential," and "forecast," reflecting
 something other than historical fact are intended to identify forward-
 looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such
 statements.  These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and
 uncertainties, including the timely development and market acceptance of
 products and technologies and other factors described in the Company's
 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The actual results may
 differ materially from any forward-looking statements due to such risks and
 uncertainties.  The Company undertakes no obligations to revise or update
 any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances
 that may arise after the date of this release.




© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission