<PAGE>
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File number: 333-76057
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
DELAWARE 22-3525626
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (IRS Employer Identification Number)
or organization)
685 ROUTE 202/206
BRIDGEWATER, NEW JERSEY 08807-1762
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>
(908) 203-9500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
NONE NONE
Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered
</TABLE>
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /X/ No / /
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in a definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. Yes / / No /X/
There is no established market for our common stock. There were 2,200,764
shares of Common stock outstanding as of February 29, 2000.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
--------
<S> <C> <C>
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: BUSINESS.................................................... 3
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT.................................... 11
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS........................................... 11
ITEM 4: SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS......... 11
ITEM 5: MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS............................ 11
ITEM 6: SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA... 12
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS................................... 14
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK........................................................ 20
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA................. 20
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.................................... 20
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.......... 21
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION...................................... 24
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT.................................................. 29
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.............. 30
ITEM 14: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K......................................................... 31
SIGNATURES............................................................. 70
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
We believe that we are a leading manufacturer and marketer of plastic and
steel industrial containers and a leading provider of related container services
in the United States and Canada. Our container manufacturing division
manufactures and sells new plastic and steel rigid industrial containers. Our
services division leases plastic rigid industrial containers, provides plastic
container fleet management services, reconditions and sells steel drums and
retrieves and recycles empty industrial containers.
Our container manufacturing and services divisions together have over 1,500
active customers in the agricultural chemical, food product, lubricant,
pharmaceutical and specialty chemical industries.
We believe that our customers base their purchasing decisions primarily on
price, quality and service and are increasingly looking to maintain
relationships with fewer suppliers who can provide a broad range of high-quality
industrial containers and related container services at competitive prices,
often on a national or international basis.
We currently operate twelve plastic drum manufacturing plants, three steel
drum manufacturing plants and six container services plants throughout the
United States and Canada, enabling us to be strategically located near our major
customers. We sell, lease and service plastic containers in most markets in the
United States and in most of the major industrial regions in Canada. We sell new
steel drums in the Northeast, the Gulf Coast, parts of the Midwest and Ontario,
Canada, regions where there is a high concentration of purchasers of steel
drums, and we sell reconditioned steel drums in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic
states.
Our statements in this report regarding the breadth of our product offerings
and our market share positions are based on our knowledge of the industry
generally and information we have developed internally, principally through our
sales and marketing efforts.
Russell-Stanley-Registered Trademark- was incorporated in 1950 as a steel
drum manufacturer and was acquired in June 1989 by affiliates of Vestar Capital
Partners.
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
In July 1997, we began consummating several acquisitions in furtherance of
our goal to become the preeminent provider of rigid industrial containers and
related container services in the United States and Canada. We acquired
Container Management Services in July 1997, Hunter Drums Limited in
October 1997, the plastics division of Smurfit Packaging Corporation in
November 1997 and New England Container in July 1998. We discuss each of the
businesses acquired under Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Introduction.
As a result of these acquisitions, we have overseen the integration of more
than 100 products and the addition of our services division. In addition, we
have increased the number of our facilities from 8 to 21 and improved our
operating efficiency and increased gross margin.
Our ability to grow by acquisition, an important component of our growth
strategy, is dependent upon, and may be limited by, the availability of suitable
acquisition candidates and capital, and the restrictions contained in our senior
subordinated notes indenture and our other indebtedness agreements. In addition,
growth by acquisition involves risks that could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations, including difficulties in integrating the
operations and personnel of acquired companies and the potential loss of key
employees and customers of acquired companies.
3
<PAGE>
RECENT ALLIANCES
We formed several strategic alliances in 1999. We joined forces with Trilla
Steel Drum and Paktank Corporation in May, and Southcorp Packaging USA, Inc. in
September. Trilla Steel Drum operates in the Chicago metro market, where we do
not have a steel drum facility. Our alliance has enabled us to compete against
companies in that area that manufacture both plastic and steel containers.
Paktank Corporation is a subsidiary of Royal Pakhoed, the world's premiere
logistics services company. As a result of this alliance, we can now offer
container manufacturing, filling, packaging and logistics services on a national
basis to customers in the chemical, petroleum, food, and related markets.
Southcorp Packaging USA, Inc., one of the largest manufacturers of smaller size
containers, produces plastic packaging in the USA, Canada, and Puerto Rico. With
this alliance, we now offer a full line of rigid plastic packaging from 1 to 330
gallons.
As a result of these alliances, we have been able to enhance our products
and services offering to meet more of the changing needs of our customers.
INDUSTRY SEGMENT OVERVIEW
As reported by The Freedonia Group Incorporated, an international
study/database company, in a study dated August 1999, the rigid industrial
container industry consists of new plastic, steel and fiber drums, rigid
intermediate bulk containers, pails, bulk boxes, and materials handling
containers. According to The Freedonia Group, the U.S. market had sales of
approximately $4.5 billion in 1998, the most recent period for which The
Freedonia Group reported relevant industry data. This represents a compound
annual growth rate of approximately 5.4% from 1989 sales of approximately
$2.8 billion. Our container manufacturing division competes in a sector of the
rigid industrial container industry which approximates $3.0 billion. We define
our sector as consisting of new and reconditioned plastic, steel and fiber
drums, rigid intermediate bulk containers and small containers/pails. Our
services division competes with other providers of similar services. We do not
know of any third-party source of market data for the industrial container
services industry.
Plastic drums are used primarily in the storage and transportation of
chemical, food and agricultural products and are also increasingly being used
for the storage and transportation of petroleum and lubricants. Plastic drums
are available in a variety of capacities, ranging from 5 to 70 gallons, with the
55-gallon drum being the most widely used. According to The Freedonia Group,
there were $270 million of new plastic drums shipped from U.S. manufacturing
establishments in 1998. Steel drums are used primarily for the transportation
and storage of liquids, semi-solids and dry products, particularly petroleum,
lubricants and chemical products, and have been utilized in these industries for
more than 40 years. Steel drums typically range in capacities from 13 to 110
gallons, with the 55-gallon drum being the most widely used. According to The
Freedonia Group, there were $680 million of new steel drums shipped from U.S.
manufacturing establishments in 1998.
Based on the changes we have experienced in our business and direct
discussions with our customers, we believe the following trends will continue to
play an important role in our industry's future
- Larger competitors which offer broader product lines and have greater
manufacturing capacities, higher operating efficiencies and a greater
ability to invest in enhanced products and services will capture
increasing market share as smaller, regional companies find it more
difficult to compete, resulting in further consolidation of the industry;
- Customers are increasingly looking to fewer suppliers to provide an
increasing percentage of their industrial container supply and servicing
requirements;
4
<PAGE>
- Customers are increasingly seeking broader product lines and global
service; consequently, our industry is becoming less regional, with
customers increasingly seeking national and international supply
arrangements.
COMPETITION
The markets for our products are competitive, and competition from current
and future competitors could reduce unit volumes and selling prices and have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations. We believe competition is
based primarily on price, quality and service. Price competition may require us
to match competitors' prices to retain business or market share. We believe that
our competitive cost structure, high quality products, broad geographic coverage
and high level of customer service enable us to compete effectively. Our
container manufacturing division competes primarily with Greif Brothers
Corporation, Hoover Materials Handling Group, Inc., Schutz Container
Systems, Inc., and Van Leer Containers, Inc. in plastic drums and Evans
Industries, Inc., Greif Brothers Corporation and Van Leer Containers, Inc. for
steel drums. Our services division competes primarily with Greif Brothers
Corporation, Hoover Materials Handling Group, Inc. and PalEx, Inc. Both of our
divisions also compete with smaller industry participants.
CONTAINER MANUFACTURING DIVISION
Our container manufacturing division manufactures and sells new plastic and
steel rigid industrial containers.
PLASTIC CONTAINERS
We operate twelve plastic drum manufacturing facilities serving most markets
in the United States and most of the major industrial regions in Canada. Our
large containers include full lines of both tight-head and open-top drums in
sizes ranging from 30 to 70 gallons. We also produce a line of smaller plastic
containers in sizes ranging from 5 to 20 gallons.
We believe that we are the principal manufacturer in the United States and
Canada of 55-gallon plastic tight-head drums, which we sell under the brand
names L-1 (LR-1 in Canada) and Delcon. Based on our knowledge of the industry
generally and our customers' preferences, we believe that the design of the L-1
and Delcon drums is the most popular design for 55-gallon plastic tight-head
drums in the United States and Canada, and we own and/or have a license to use
important proprietary technology relating to the manufacture and sale of these
drums. We believe that the L-1 and Delcon drums offer significant production
cost advantages over earlier two-piece drum designs, including higher
manufacturing speeds and lower manufacturing costs. We also believe that the L-1
and Delcon drums are superior to our competitors' similar products because of
their design features. We believe that the primary advantages offered by the
design features of the L-1 and Delcon drums are:
- superior design which easily accommodates both new and old drum handling
equipment and which is available with an optimally drainable feature which
we were instrumental in pioneering; and
- excellent performance with high structural integrity.
A key component of our strategy has been to build on the acceptance of the
L-1 and Delcon drums by enhancing our broad product offering. We have
accomplished this by both the introduction of new products and selective
acquisitions. We have introduced several new products, including a 30-gallon
version of the L-1 and Delcon drums and a light-weight 15-gallon drum. Most
recently, we introduced a number of new drum designs for use in specific
markets, including a plastic export drum that significantly reduces freight
costs for exporters who use overseas shipping containers, an open-top plastic
drum that is designed for the leasing market served by our services division and
a returnable/
5
<PAGE>
reusable drum principally for use in the agricultural market. On many of our
drums over 15 gallons, we offer an optimally drainable design feature which
allows the drums to be drained to less than 50 milliliters of residual product.
We do not know of any other drain design which permits better drainage. In
addition, through the acquisition of the plastics division of Smurfit Packaging
Corporation, we broadened our product line to include open-top drums as well as
smaller (i.e., 5- to 20-gallon) plastic containers, providing us with one of the
broadest lines of plastic containers in the industry.
We also manufacture several specialty tight-head drums, including a
high-purity "clean" drum for use in the electronic chemical market, drums for
the lubricant industry which use special replaceable closures and are capable of
four-high stacking, a "raised head" drum for end users with special stacking
requirements and a "heavy" drum that meets United Nations international shipping
standards for particular products. Other products include plastic liners used
for steel, fiber and composite drums.
STEEL CONTAINERS
We have three steel drum facilities which serve the Northeast, the Gulf
Coast, parts of the Midwest and Ontario, Canada, regions where there is a high
concentration of purchasers of steel drums.
We produce a broad line of the widely used 55-gallon steel drum,
manufactured to customer specifications, including steel gauge, special linings,
custom painting and special closure systems. Our line of steel drum products
also includes lined and unlined tight-head and open-top drums and tight-head
drums that incorporate our optimally drainable design feature. In addition, we
also manufacture a steel export drum that significantly reduces freight costs
for exporters who use overseas shipping containers.
We are pursuing new products and product enhancements for our line of steel
drums. For example, in the second quarter of 1997, we introduced into our
product line a drum with an innovative "W" shaped rolling hoop that has better
performance characteristics than steel drums with the standard rolling hoop.
SERVICES DIVISION
Our services division leases plastic rigid industrial containers, provides
plastic container fleet management services, reconditions and sells steel drums
and retrieves and recycles empty industrial containers.
The addition of these container services to our historical manufacturing
business enables us to serve a wider range of our customers' evolving industrial
container requirements and is an important aspect of our strategy to retain and
enhance a leading market position as our customers increasingly look to maintain
relationships with fewer suppliers. Since 1991, the growth of the plastic
container leasing and fleet management segment of the market, pioneered by
Container Management Services, has outpaced the growth of our container
manufacturing business.
CONTAINER LEASING
Our services division pioneered the businesses of plastic container leasing
on a per use or round-trip basis and plastic container fleet management in the
United States and Canada utilizing inventory tracking technology.
In our plastic container leasing business, our services division leases a
plastic container to a customer, who fills the container and ships the full
container to its customer, the end-user. The end-user then calls a toll-free
number, and we arrange to pick up the empty container directly from the
end-user. Upon its return, the container is thoroughly inspected, cleaned and
graded and either inventoried for re-use or, if below grade, recycled or sold.
We charge our leasing customers a flat per
6
<PAGE>
use price. We believe that container leasing on a per use or round trip basis is
an attractive alternative to purchasing as per use leasing may result in lower
container costs for our customers. Also, our retrieval of the empty container
relieves the end-user of container disposal.
CONTAINER FLEET MANAGEMENT
In our plastic container fleet management business, our services division
provides the customer with the same services as described above, but using the
customer's fleet of containers purchased from our container manufacturing
division or from another manufacturer. We also charge our container fleet
management customers a flat per use price.
STEEL RECONDITIONING
We began steel drum reconditioning in July 1998 with the acquisition of New
England Container, a leader in terms of quality and service. Our services
division arranges for the retrieval of empty industrial containers of all types,
including containers manufactured by other manufacturers. Larger end-users of
drums are provided with trailers to store their empty drums. When the trailer is
filled, we arrange for it to be returned to our service facility and leave an
empty trailer in its place. We also arrange to pick up empty drums from smaller
customers on request. Used drums are returned to our service facility where they
are thoroughly inspected, sorted and graded. The drums are then cleaned and
either processed for recycling or fully reconditioned. The reconditioning
process includes metal preparation to prepare the steel for a new coating, metal
bending to remove all dents and insure the drum meets dimensional
specifications, leak testing, interior lining and exterior painting to meet the
filling customer's specifications. A reconditioned steel drum sells for
approximately 60% of the price of a new steel drum. We generally charge our
customers a fee to pick up and dispose of used drums. In some cases, however, we
will pay the customer a small fee for drums which are in high demand and are of
reconditionable quality.
CONTAINER RECYCLING
We provide for the environmentally sound destruction of plastic and fiber
containers and steel containers that are not suitable for reconditioning on a
contract basis. The empty containers are cleaned in an environmentally sound
manner and are then processed for sale as recycled material.
CUSTOMERS
Some of our major customers include A. Smith Bowman Distillery Incorporated;
Ashland Chemical Co.; BASF Corporation; Bayer Corporation; CIBA-GEIGY Co.;
Clariant Corporation; Crompton & Knowles Corporation; Diversey Lever; The Dow
Chemical Company; E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.; Ecolab, Inc.; Equilon
Enterprises, LLC; Exxon Corporation; General Electric Company; Henkel Surface
Technologies (Henkel Corporation); National Packaging Services, Inc.; Novus
International, Inc.; PPG Industries, Inc.; Rohm and Haas Company; and Union
Carbide Corporation. We have received numerous quality awards from our
customers, including a Supplier Partnership Award from The Dow Chemical Company,
three Distinguished Vendor awards from Ecolab, Inc., a Supplier of the Year
award from Novus International, Inc., an Excellent Supplier of the Year award
from PPG Industries, Inc., three Quality Supplier Q-1 awards from Parker-Amchem,
a division of Henkel Corporation, and a Supplier of the Year award from Union
Carbide Corporation.
RAW MATERIALS
The principal raw material and most significant cost component for our
plastic containers is high density polyethylene resin, also known as HDPE resin.
We generally maintain less than one month of HDPE resin inventory at each
plastic manufacturing facility.
7
<PAGE>
The principal raw material and most significant cost component for our steel
drums is cold-rolled steel. We generally maintain one to two months of
cold-rolled steel inventory at each steel manufacturing facility. We maintain
this level of inventory of cold-rolled steel because we purchase a portion of
our cold-rolled steel from foreign suppliers who do not ship as frequently as
domestic suppliers. There is no effect on our operating margin from maintaining
this additional inventory.
Raw materials purchasing is centrally managed from our corporate
headquarters. We maintain relationships with various suppliers for HDPE resin,
cold-rolled steel and other raw materials. While we generally believe our access
to raw materials is good, we may not have an uninterrupted supply of raw
materials at competitive prices. We generally do not have long-term supply
contracts with our suppliers, and our purchases of raw materials are subject to
market prices. We generally pass changes in the prices of raw materials to our
customers over a period of time. We cannot always do so, however, and we may not
be able to pass through any future raw material price increases. Any limitation
on our ability to pass through any future raw material price increases could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We do not manufacture rigid intermediate bulk containers. Our rigid
intermediate bulk containers purchases are effected through individual purchase
orders. The unavailability or unwillingness of a manufacturer to supply us with
rigid intermediate bulk containers, or IBCs, on commercially reasonable terms or
at all would restrict our ability to offer plastic container leasing services to
our customers which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. In addition, the inability of a manufacturer to supply IBCs in a
timely fashion, or to satisfy our quality standards, could cause us to miss the
delivery date requirements of our customers for those items, which could result
in a cancellation of orders, refusal to accept delivery or a reduction in prices
and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. We purchase IBCs which our services division leases to our
customers. Our IBC suppliers are also our competitors in some of our product
lines. We do not have long-term contracts for the supply of IBCs with these
manufacturers and compete with other companies for production capacity. Should
we need to secure alternative suppliers, only a small number of alternative
suppliers exist.
SALES AND MARKETING
Our sales and marketing is conducted through a sales force of approximately
37 people. While our sales force is generally divided along our product and
service lines, we have a group of Strategic Account Managers who sell and market
all of our products and services to our large customers who purchase across our
product and services lines. Our Strategic Account Managers promote us as a
source for all of our customers' rigid industrial container requirements.
Our Strategic Account Managers also coordinate our participation in the
Mauser International Packaging Institute and Drumnet associations of industrial
container suppliers. We and other participants in these organizations can offer
to supply and service a customer's industrial container requirements through the
network of participants in more than 30 countries, primarily in North America,
Europe and Asia. Our ability to provide for our customers' industrial container
requirements on an international basis results in stronger relationships with
large international customers operating in U.S. and Canadian markets.
Our sales personnel work closely with our customers and business operators
to satisfy all of our customers' industrial container requirements. Our sales
personnel are trained to seek and recognize opportunities to cross-sell all of
our products and services. In addition, we have employees who are trained to
provide extensive technical and regulatory support to our customers.
8
<PAGE>
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We have the exclusive license from Mauser-Werke GmbH, a German company, to
manufacture the L-1 drum throughout all of the United States, except particular
parts of the Southeast, and throughout all of Canada. We and one other
manufacturer have the exclusive right to sell the L-1 throughout the United
States and we have the exclusive right to sell the LR-1 in Canada. There are
over 40 licensees worldwide for Mauser plastic drum technology, which is
generally acknowledged as one of the best large plastic blow mold production
technologies worldwide. Our rights to the Mauser technology derive from a series
of licenses. All but one of these licenses terminate on July 31, 2008, unless
one or more improvement patents are issued, in which case they terminate on the
earlier of:
(1) the expiration of the latest to expire of these improvement patents; or
(2) July 31, 2015, unless extended by Mauser.
The remaining license, which is not material to our operations, terminated
on December 31, 1999 and was automatically extended to December 31, 2000, and
will be renewed for one year periods thereafter unless either party gives notice
of termination six months beforehand. Mauser can terminate our licenses if we
fail to comply with the covenants contained in the licenses, including our
obligations to make royalty payments. Approximately 23% of our total revenues
are generated by products created under the Mauser licenses.
We also have the non-exclusive license from Gallay S.A. to manufacture steel
containers using Gallay's patented production process at our steel drum
manufacturing facilities and the non-exclusive license to sell these steel
containers throughout the United States and Canada. The duration of the Gallay
licenses extends to the time of expiration of the last of any patent licensed
under our agreements with Gallay. Approximately 30% of our total revenues are
generated by products created under the Gallay licenses.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1999, we employed 1,417 persons, of whom 33 were employed
at corporate headquarters, 251 were regional or area managers and support
personnel and 1,133 were employed at our manufacturing and service facilities.
Approximately 30% of our employees are represented under collective bargaining
agreements which expire from March 2001 to January 2005. None of our employees
are working under expired collective bargaining agreements. We do not anticipate
any difficulty in extending or renegotiating our collective bargaining
agreements as they expire. While we believe that our labor relations with our
unionized employees are good, a prolonged labor dispute could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results or operations.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
Our operations are subject to federal, state, local and Canadian
environmental laws that continue to be adopted and amended. These environmental
laws regulate, among other things, air and water emissions and discharges at our
manufacturing and service facilities; our generation, storage, treatment,
transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous waste; and the release of
toxic substances, pollutants and contaminants into the environment at properties
that we operate and at other sites. In some circumstances and jurisdictions,
these laws also impose requirements regarding the environmental conditions at
properties prior to a transfer or sale. These laws may apply to facilities that
we previously owned or operated. Our business involves the manufacture, lease
and reconditioning of containers, which may be used for food, agricultural,
petroleum and chemical products. Risks of significant costs and liabilities are
inherent in our operations and facilities, as they are with other companies
engaged in like businesses. We believe, however, that our operations are in
substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws.
9
<PAGE>
In addition, under environmental laws, a current or previous owner of real
property, and parties that generate or transport hazardous substances that are
disposed of at real property, may be liable for the costs of investigating and
remediating these substances on or under the property. The federal Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Act, as amended, and similar
laws, may impose this liability on a joint and several basis, regardless of
whether the liable party was at fault for the presence of the hazardous
substances. We have not incurred significant liability in several of these cases
asserted against us and settled to date involving the cleanup of off-site
locations where we allegedly disposed of waste. However, we cannot assure that a
material claim under these laws will not arise in the future.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has confirmed the presence of
contaminants, including dioxin, in and along the Woonasquatucket River in Rhode
Island. Prior to 1970, New England Container operated a facility in North
Providence, Rhode Island along the Woonasquatucket River at a site where
contaminants have been found. New England Container and the current owners of
the property have been formally identified by the EPA as potentially responsible
parties, with the site added to the National Priority Superfund Site list in
February 2000. Although New England Container no longer operates the facility,
and did not operate the facility at the time we acquired the outstanding capital
stock of New England Container in July 1998, New England Container could incur
liability under federal and state environmental laws and/or as a result of civil
litigation. We believe that any resulting liability is subject to a contractual
indemnity from Vincent J. Buonanno, one of our directors and the former owner of
New England Container. This indemnity is subject to a $2.0 million limit. We
currently are unable to estimate the likelihood or extent of any liability;
however, this matter may result in liability to New England Container that could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
10
<PAGE>
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT
We own or lease twelve plastic and three steel drum manufacturing facilities
and six service facilities. The following table sets forth particular
information as of December 31, 1999 with respect to our facilities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOCATION DESCRIPTION AREA (SQUARE FEET) LEASED OR OWNED
- -------- ------------------------------- ------------------ ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Allentown, Pennsylvania............ Plastic Manufacturing 140,000 Leased
Romeoville, Illinois............... Plastic Manufacturing 70,000 Owned
Houston, Texas..................... Plastic Manufacturing 50,000 Owned
Rancho Cucamonga, California....... Plastic Manufacturing 73,500 Owned
Nitro, West Virginia............... Plastic Manufacturing 58,000 Leased
Reserve, Louisiana................. Plastic Manufacturing 72,000 Owned
The Woodlands, Texas............... Plastic Manufacturing 90,000 Leased
Atlanta, Georgia................... Plastic Manufacturing 95,000 Owned
South Brunswick, New Jersey........ Plastic Manufacturing 110,000 Leased
Addison, Illinois.................. Plastic Manufacturing 135,000 Owned
Wilmington, Delaware(*)............ Plastic Manufacturing 80,000 Leased
Bramalea, Ontario.................. Plastic Manufacturing 80,000 Leased
Woodbridge, New Jersey............. Steel Manufacturing 120,000 Owned
Houston, Texas..................... Steel Manufacturing 106,500 Owned
Burlington, Ontario................ Steel Manufacturing 60,000 Owned
Simpsonville, South Carolina (two Plastic Services
facilities)...................... 123,000/40,000 Leased
Allentown, Pennsylvania............ Plastic Services 150,000 Leased
Smithfield, Rhode Island........... Plastic and Steel Services 44,000 Owned
Baltimore, Maryland................ Steel Services 39,000 Leased
Richmond, Virginia................. Steel Services 16,500 Leased
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(*) Scheduled to be closed in 2000.
We own approximately 1,100 trailers and lease approximately 450 trailers to
help ensure on-time delivery of containers directly to our customers'
facilities.
Our leased corporate and executive headquarters, located in Bridgewater, New
Jersey, provides administrative services to our facilities, including
accounting, accounts receivable, financial reporting, human resources,
information technology, insurance, taxes and treasury services.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe these lawsuits are material to our results of
operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders of Russell-Stanley
during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, which is the final quarter covered
by this report.
ITEM 5. MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
There is no established trading market for our common stock, of which there
were fifteen (15) holders of record on December 31, 1999. We have not paid any
dividends on our common stock
11
<PAGE>
and do not plan to pay any such dividends for the foreseeable future. Our senior
credit facility prohibits us from paying dividends, as does the indenture
pursuant to which our outstanding senior subordinated notes were issued.
ITEM 6. SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
Set forth below is selected historical consolidated financial and other data
as of and for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995. The
data as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997 were derived from the consolidated financial statements and
related notes audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, which are
included in this report. The data as of December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 and for
the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 have been derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes which are not included in
this report.
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. was formed in July 1997 to serve as a holding
company for Russell-Stanley Corp. and its subsidiaries. The transaction was
accounted for in a method similar to a pooling of interests, and therefore the
financial data presented below has been prepared from financial statements that
include the operations of Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries as
if they had been combined for all periods presented.
We completed three acquisitions during 1997 and one acquisition during 1998,
all accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. See Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Introduction.
In conjunction with the integration of acquired entities and expansion of
our operations, we developed a plan to streamline our operations and sales force
and consolidate and relocate our corporate headquarters in order to improve
operating efficiencies and reduce costs. As part of this plan, we recorded
non-recurring charges of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 1998. These charges primarily include costs related to the closure
of a container manufacturing facility, severance and other personnel related
costs, such as the relocation of our corporate headquarters and other
miscellaneous costs. Non-recurring charges for the year ended December 31, 1998
also included $2.7 million of costs associated with proposed acquisitions that
were not consummated. In 1999, we developed a plan to further streamline our
operations as a result of our change in management. We recorded approximately
$1.9 million of non-recurring charges in 1999 that related to severance and
other personnel related costs. See Note 18--Non-Recurring Charges in our
financial statements included in this report.
In this table, the terms "EBITDA," "EBITDA Margin," and "Adjusted EBITDA"
have the meanings stated below:
- We define "EBITDA" as income (loss) before extraordinary items, plus
interest expense, income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation and
amortization. We define "EBITDA Margin" as EBITDA divided by net sales.
EBITDA does not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to,
net income or cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"), and our calculation
therefore may not be comparable to that reported by other companies. While
EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net
income, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow
statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP, or as a measure of
profitability or operating performance, management understands that EBITDA
is commonly used in evaluating a company's ability to service debt.
However, EBITDA does not take into account our debt service requirements
and other commitments and, accordingly, does not necessarily represent
amounts that may be available to us for discretionary uses.
12
<PAGE>
- We define "Adjusted EBITDA" as EBITDA plus non-recurring charges and
management fees we pay to Vestar. See "Related Party Transactions." Our
borrowing arrangements permit us to add back these charges when we
calculate our compliance with financial covenants contained in the senior
subordinated notes indenture.
Historical data are not necessarily indicative of future results. The data
presented below should be read in conjunction with the discussion under Item 7.
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and our financial statements.
Certain amounts in 1998 have been reclassified to conform to the 1999
presentation.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
Net sales:
Container manufacturing division......................... $224.9 $230.0 $161.1 $141.9 $138.8
Services division........................................ 62.2 46.6 15.2 -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total net sales........................................ 287.1 276.6 176.3 141.9 138.8
Cost of sales.............................................. 222.5 213.2 133.6 103.6 106.5
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Gross profit............................................... 64.6 63.4 42.7 38.3 32.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses............... 51.4 45.5 26.8 24.3 21.4
Non-recurring charges...................................... 1.9 6.2 -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income from operations..................................... 11.3 11.7 15.9 14.0 10.9
Other (income) expense, net................................ (0.1) 0.5 0.2 0.3 --
Interest expense........................................... 21.1 16.0 8.8 7.5 8.3
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary
items.................................................... (9.7) (4.8) 6.9 6.2 2.6
Provision (benefit) for income taxes....................... (2.2) (0.5) 2.9 2.5 1.2
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income (loss) before extraordinary items................... $ (7.5) $ (4.3) $ 4.0 $ 3.7 $ 1.4
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
Cash flows from (used in):
Operating activities..................................... $ 14.2 $ 30.8 $ 17.7 $ 4.4 $ 14.0
Investing activities..................................... (28.6) (41.2) (140.3) (3.3) (4.9)
Financing activities..................................... 13.4 11.0 122.5 (1.3) (8.3)
EBITDA..................................................... 41.5 37.8 25.8 19.6 17.1
EBITDA margin.............................................. 14.5% 13.7% 14.6% 13.8% 12.3%
Adjusted EBITDA............................................ $ 44.2 $ 44.9 $ 26.2 $ 19.9 $ 17.4
Adjusted EBITDA margin..................................... 15.4% 16.2% 14.9% 14.0% 12.5%
Capital expenditures....................................... $ 28.6 $ 28.7 $ 9.9 $ 3.3 $ 4.8
Depreciation and amortization.............................. 30.1 26.6 10.1 5.9 6.2
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Working capital............................................ $ 14.5 $ 12.9 $ 20.2 $ 17.6 $ 11.7
Property, plant and equipment, net......................... 94.6 92.6 85.0 31.2 33.0
Total assets............................................... 268.0 258.3 245.5 88.8 88.4
Total debt................................................. 192.8 171.6 161.4 86.2 83.3
Redeemable preferred stock................................. -- -- -- 27.5 23.5
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)....................... 26.6 33.5 38.8 (14.5) (14.2)
</TABLE>
13
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The rigid industrial container industry has been undergoing consolidation
for a number of years and remains fragmented. We believe that the industry will
evolve to support a few participants who are able to provide a broad range of
containers and related container services. As a result, we began pursuing, and
in July 1997 began consummating, several acquisitions in furtherance of our goal
to become the leading industrial container supply chain management company. Each
of these transactions was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
CONTAINER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. In July 1997, we acquired all the
capital stock of Container Management Services. Container Management Services
pioneered the businesses of plastic container leasing on a per use or round-trip
basis and plastic container fleet management in the United States and Canada
utilizing inventory tracking technology. Container Management Services operated
two facilities in South Carolina.
HUNTER DRUMS LIMITED. In October 1997, we acquired substantially all of the
capital stock of Hunter Drums Limited. Our acquisition of Hunter Drums Limited,
which included an exclusive license to manufacture and sell the LR-1 drum in
Canada, expanded our geographic reach for plastic and steel drums. Located near
Toronto, Hunter Drums Limited currently serves Ontario, Canada and parts of the
Midwest and Northeast United States.
PLASTICS DIVISION OF SMURFIT PACKAGING CORPORATION. In November 1997, we
acquired the plastics division of Smurfit Packaging Corporation. The acquisition
of this division broadened our product line to include open-top drums as well as
smaller plastic containers, including the 5- to 20-gallon size, and enhanced our
geographic reach and market position in the United States. The plastics division
of Smurfit Packaging Corporation operated a facility in each of New Jersey,
Georgia, Illinois, Texas and Delaware.
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER CO., INC. In July 1998, we acquired all the capital
stock of New England Container. New England Container provided our services
division with entry into the steel drum reconditioning market. New England
Container operated a facility in each of Rhode Island, Maryland and Virginia.
All of our revenues are derived from sales of our products and services. Our
expenses consist primarily of cost of sales, selling, general and administrative
expenses and interest expense. The most significant component of cost of sales
is our expense for purchases of HDPE resin, which is the principal raw material
for plastic drums, and cold-rolled steel, which is the principal raw material
for steel drums. Over a period of time, we generally pass changes in the prices
for HDPE resin and cold-rolled steel through to our customers, resulting in
relatively consistent gross profit margins on a per unit basis. Our results of
operations are affected by the level of economic activity in the industries
served by our customers, which in turn may be affected by the level of economic
activity in the U.S. and foreign markets which they serve. Because we operate
with little or no backlog, changes in economic activity, positive and negative,
affect our results of operations more quickly than these changes would affect
the results of operations of a company that operated with a backlog.
Although we anticipate minimal/flat growth in the overall steel drum and
steel reconditioning market, we believe opportunities exist to increase our
market share for our steel products mainly from competitors, companies exiting
the business due to a lack of funds for investment in new products, equipment,
environmental and quality initiatives as well as geographic expansion.
We expect plastic drum shipments in the United States to rise 4.5% annually
through 2003, with gains being restrained as users of rigid industrial
containers increasingly convert to IBCs, which we
14
<PAGE>
expect to rise 10% annually through 2003. A typical IBC replaces the need for
approximately five 55-gallon drums. Although we provide IBCs through our
services division, currently, we do not manufacture IBCs and are evaluating
options for obtaining or acquiring the capacity to do so. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful in obtaining or acquiring this capacity.
The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe
is relevant to an understanding of our consolidated financial position and
results of operations. The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes included in this
report.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for each of the periods indicated, statement
of operations data, expressed as a percentage of net sales:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: 1999 1998 1997
- ----------------------------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales.............................................. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales.......................................... 77.5 77.1 75.8
Gross profit........................................... 22.5 22.9 24.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses........... 17.9 16.4 15.2
Income from operations................................. 3.9 4.2 9.0
Interest expense....................................... 7.3 5.8 5.0
Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items..... (3.4) (1.7) 3.9
Income (loss) before extraordinary items............... (2.7) (1.6) 2.3
</TABLE>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998
NET SALES
Net sales increased 3.8% to $287.1 million in 1999 from $276.6 million in
1998. Our container manufacturing division's net sales declined 2.2% to
$224.9 million in 1999, from $230.0 million in 1998, due primarily to selling
price declines in response to lower raw material prices coupled with competitive
pressures. Unit volume decreases due to some share shifts in steel containers
and a lack of demand from specialty export segments tempered core unit growth in
plastic containers. Net sales in our services division increased 33.5% to
$62.2 million in 1999 from $46.6 million in 1998 due to the net sales of New
England Container, which was acquired in July 1998, and growth in IBC leasing.
Excluding the impact of the New England Container acquisition, our services
division's net sales increased approximately 9.5%, despite lower selling prices
in response to competitive pressures.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit increased $1.2 million to $64.6 million in 1999 from
$63.4 million in 1998, primarily from the benefit of higher unit sales volume
and lower raw material prices, which more than offset the impact of across the
board lower selling prices, and higher return freight costs and depreciation
expense in services. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to
22.5% in 1999 from 22.9% in 1998 as a result of lower selling prices.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales
increased to 17.9% in 1999 from 16.4% in 1998 primarily due to investments in
our services infrastructure, the impact of the
15
<PAGE>
New England Container acquisition, higher inter-region delivery costs, a legal
settlement provision and lower average selling prices.
NON-RECURRING CHARGES
In conjunction with the integration of acquired entities and expansion of
our operations, we developed a plan to streamline our operations and sales force
and consolidate and relocate our corporate headquarters in order to improve
operating efficiencies and reduce costs. As part of this plan, we recorded
non-recurring charges of approximately $3.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 1998. These charges primarily include costs related to the closure
of a container manufacturing facility, severance and other personnel related
costs, such as the relocation of our corporate headquarters and other
miscellaneous costs. Non-recurring charges for the year ended December 31, 1998
also include $2.7 million of costs associated with proposed acquisitions that
were not consummated. In 1999, we developed a plan to further streamline our
operations as a result of our change in management. We recorded approximately
$1.9 million of additional non-recurring charges in 1999 that related to
severance and other personnel related costs.
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
Income from operations decreased by $0.4 million to $11.3 million in 1999
from $11.7 million in 1998 as a result of the factors described above.
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
In 1999, we recorded other income, net of $0.1 million as compared to other
expense, net of $0.5 million in 1998. The change was due to currency movements
impacting the fair value of foreign exchange contracts.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $21.1 million in 1999 compared with $16.0 million in
1998. The increase in interest expense is the result of increased debt levels
associated with the acquisition of New England Container in July 1998 and the
refinancing of our revolving credit loan and term loans and the senior
subordinated notes offering in February 1999. In addition, our weighted average
interest rate on this indebtedness is higher than the rate on our former senior
credit agreement.
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEM
In 1999, the loss before income taxes and extraordinary item was
$9.7 million versus $4.8 million in 1998, as the result of the factors described
above.
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT)
The effective tax rate (benefit) on income was (23.0)% in 1999 and (10.4)%
in 1998, both lower than the statutory federal income tax benefit due to the
non-deductible portion of goodwill associated with our acquisitions and higher
foreign income taxes.
LOSS BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEM
In 1999, the loss before extraordinary item was $7.5 million versus
$4.3 million in 1998 due to the factors described above.
16
<PAGE>
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM
As a result of the February 1999 refinancing of our revolving credit loan,
term loans and the senior subordinated notes, we incurred an extraordinary
charge of $0.8 million, which is net of tax benefits of $0.5 million, relating
to the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs.
NET LOSS
In 1999, the net loss was $8.2 million versus $4.3 million in 1998, as a
result of the factors described above.
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997
NET SALES
Net sales increased 56.9% to $276.6 million in 1998 from $176.3 million in
1997. Our container manufacturing division's net sales rose 42.8% to
$230.0 million in 1998 from $161.1 million in 1997, due primarily to the full
year volume impact of our acquisitions of Hunter Drums Limited and the plastics
division of Smurfit Packaging Corporation. Our services division's net sales
more than tripled to $46.6 million in 1998 from $15.2 million in 1997, due
primarily to the full year volume impact of the Container Management Services
acquisition and the net sales of New England Container since we acquired it in
July 1998. Selling prices declined for both divisions, primarily in response to
lower raw material prices coupled with competitive pressures.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit increased $20.7 million to $63.4 million in 1998 from
$42.7 million in 1997, primarily from increased sales volume and the benefit of
lower raw material prices. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales declined to
22.9% in 1998 from 24.2% in 1997. The effect of higher sales volume, favorable
raw material prices and improvements in efficiency were more than offset by the
impact of lower selling prices and higher depreciation expense in our services
division. In addition, gross profit as a percentage of sales was adversely
impacted by short-term manufacturing inefficiencies as a result of the closure
of a container manufacturing facility and the start-up of a co-located container
manufacturing and services facility.
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales
increased to 16.4% in 1998 from 15.2% in 1997 primarily due to investments in
computer technology, logistics and sales and marketing infrastructure, as well
as the relocation of our corporate headquarters. Additionally, higher goodwill
amortization expense and consulting fees associated with integration activities
related to the acquisitions we made in 1997 and 1998 and for other activities
contributed to the increase.
NON-RECURRING CHARGES
In conjunction with the integration of acquired entities and expansion of
our operations, we developed a plan to streamline our operations and sales force
and consolidate and relocate our corporate headquarters in order to improve
operating efficiencies and reduce costs. As part of this plan, we recorded
restructuring, integration and other charges of approximately $3.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 1998. These charges primarily include costs related
to the closure of a container manufacturing facility, severance costs and other
personnel related costs, the relocation of corporate headquarters, and other
miscellaneous costs. Also included in non-recurring charges at December 31, 1998
are $2.7 million of costs associated with proposed acquisitions that were not
consummated. No such charges were incurred in 1997.
17
<PAGE>
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
Income from operations for 1998 decreased by $4.2 million to $11.7 million
from $15.9 million in 1997 as a result of the non-recurring charges recorded in
1998.
OTHER EXPENSE, NET
Other expense, net increased to $0.5 million in 1998 from $0.2 million in
1997, primarily due to the continuing devaluation of the Canadian dollar, which
adversely impacted the fair value of foreign exchange contracts.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense was $16.0 million in 1998 compared with $8.8 million in
1997. The increase in interest expense is the result of increased debt levels
associated with the acquisitions we made in 1997 and 1998 as well as our capital
and debt restructurings in July and November 1997. See "Note 1--Organization and
Basis of Presentation" in our financial statements.
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
In 1998, the loss before taxes and extraordinary items was $4.8 million as
compared to income before taxes and extraordinary items of $6.9 million in 1997.
This decrease is primarily as a result of the increase in interest expense and
the 1998 non-recurring charges.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal uses of cash are for capital expenditures, interest expense,
working capital and acquisitions. We utilize funds generated from operations and
borrowings to meet these requirements. For the years ended December 31, 1999,
1998 and 1997, net cash generated by operating activities totaled approximately
$14.2 million, $30.8 million and $17.7 million, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, we made capital
expenditures of approximately $28.6 million, $28.7 million and $9.9 million,
respectively. Our capital expenditures included approximately $18.0 million,
$14.7 million and $4.2 million for purchases of containers for our leasing
business for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. We
currently have no capital commitments outside the ordinary course of business.
Other significant investing activities included the acquisitions we made in 1998
and 1997. The aggregate cash purchase price for the acquisitions was
$13.9 million in 1998 and $130.2 million in 1997. In addition, as part of the
consideration for the acquisitions, in 1998 we issued 24,243 shares of our
common stock and in 1997 we issued 27,778 shares of non-voting exchangeable
stock exchangeable into 27,778 shares of our common stock.
Our principal working capital requirements are to finance accounts
receivable and inventories. As of December 31, 1999, we had net working capital
of approximately $14.5 million, including $0.7 million of cash, $30.1 million of
accounts receivable, $24.6 million of inventory, $4.7 million of other current
assets and approximately $45.6 million of accounts payable and accrued expenses.
On February 10, 1999, we refinanced our revolving credit loan and term loans
by amending our senior credit facility to provide for a $75.0 million revolving
credit line (including a $15.0 million Canadian credit line), which bears
interest, at our election, at a combination of domestic source and Eurodollar
borrowing rates which fluctuate based on our EBITDA and debt levels, and a
$25.0 million term loan, bearing interest at 9.48%. The revolving credit
facility matures in February 2004 and the term loan matures in two equal
installments in June 2006 and 2007. In addition, we issued $150 million of
10 7/8% senior subordinated notes due February 15, 2009, issued at 99.248%
resulting in an effective yield of 11.0%. The senior credit facility contains
certain covenants and restrictions and is secured by
18
<PAGE>
substantially all our assets. The notes require semi-annual interest payments
which commenced August 15, 1999 and mature February 2009. The notes are
subordinate to all existing and future senior indebtedness and are
unconditionally guaranteed by the domestic subsidiaries and contain a number of
customary covenants and restrictions. Deferred financing charges of
approximately $7.7 million were incurred in connection with the refinancing. As
of December 31, 1999, we and our subsidiaries had total indebtedness of
approximately $193.0 million, approximately $19.0 million of which was senior
indebtedness.
In July 1997, we restructured our capital structure through the following
transactions:
- issuance of 1,222,221 shares of common stock in exchange for $54,999,940,
resulting in additional paid-in capital of $54,987,718,
- repurchase of 122,500 shares of common stock for $4,450,500,
- repurchase of all outstanding senior subordinated notes for $29,257,638,
including make whole payments of $3,025,858 and accrued interest of
$240,080,
- repurchase of $15.00/$17.50 cumulative exchangeable redeemable preferred
stock (Series B) for $37,611,126, including make whole payments of
$7,529,123 and accrued interest of $302,745 and
- conversion/repurchase of warrants for $1,059,190.
In addition, we restructured our debt through the following transactions:
- repayment of existing bank debt of $25,924,331 and
- borrowing on a new credit facility of $46,102,987.
Immediately following these transactions, we formed Russell-Stanley
Holdings, Inc. to serve as a holding company. The transaction was accounted for
in a manner similar to a pooling of interests, and therefore, our financial
statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 1997 reflect our results
of operations and financial condition as if Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and
its subsidiaries had been combined for the entire year. In November 1997, we
issued 377,779 shares of common stock in exchange for $17,000,055, resulting in
additional paid-in capital of $16,996,277. See "Note 1--Organization and Basis
of Presentation" in our financial statements included in this report.
Based upon the current level of operations and revenue growth, our
management believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together
with available borrowings under our senior credit facility, will be adequate to
meet our future liquidity needs for the next several years.
EFFECT OF INFLATION
Inflation generally affects our business by increasing the interest expense
of floating rate indebtedness and by increasing the cost of raw materials, labor
and equipment. We do not believe that inflation has had any material effect on
our business during the periods discussed.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARD
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". SFAS 133
establishes new disclosure requirements which provide a comprehensive standard
for recognition and measurement of derivatives and hedging activities. This will
require new disclosures, all derivatives to be recorded on the balance sheet at
fair value and special accounting for particular types of hedges. SFAS 133 is
scheduled to take effect for us on January 1, 2001. We do not believe that
SFAS 133 will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
19
<PAGE>
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than
statements of historical facts included in this report may constitute
forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on
our current expectations and projections about future events. Although we
believe that our assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our assumptions and
expectations will prove to have been correct. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise. A description of some of the
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations
expressed in the company's forward-looking statements set forth in the Company's
Form S-4 (File No. 333-76057) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the caption "Forward-Looking Statements" is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
GENERAL
Our results of operations and financial condition are affected by changes in
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates as measured against the U.S.
dollar. We manage this exposure through internal policies and procedures and the
use of derivative financial instruments. In accordance with our internal
policies, we only use derivative financial instruments for risk management and
not for speculative or trading purposes.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The revolving indebtedness under our senior credit facility bears interest
at a floating rate. Our primary exposure to interest rate risk is as a result of
changes in interest expense related to this indebtedness due to changes in
market interest rates. We maintain an interest rate collar in an aggregate
notional principal amount of $22.5 million to limit our exposure to interest
rate risk. Under this collar, if the actual LIBOR rate at the specified
measurement date is greater than a ceiling rate stated in the collar agreement,
the other party to the collar pays us the differential interest expense. If the
actual LIBOR rate is lower than the floor stated in the collar agreement, we pay
the other party to the collar the differential interest expense. The collar
terminates on November 30, 2000. A 10% increase in interest rates at
December 31, 1999 would not have a material adverse affect on our results of
operations, financial condition or cash flows.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE RISK
We have operations in Canada and sales denominated in Canadian dollars. Our
primary exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk is as a result of
changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. We
currently do not maintain any derivative financial instruments to limit our
exposure to this risk.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements are filed under this Item, beginning
on page 33 of this report. The financial statement schedules required under
Regulation S-X are filed pursuant to Item 14 of this report, beginning on page
31 of this report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
20
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Our Directors and executive officers are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITION
- ---- -------- ------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Robert L. Rosner.......................... 40 Chairman of the Board of Directors
Daniel W. Miller.......................... 49 President and Chief Executive Officer,
Assistant Secretary and Director
Mark E. Daniels........................... 39 Executive Vice President, President of
Container Management Services and Director
Michael W. Hunter......................... 42 Executive Vice President, President of
Hunter Drums Limited and Director
John H. Hunter............................ 53 Vice President, Operations and
Engineering-Container Manufacturing
Division
David Garrison............................ 60 Vice President, Operations, Container
Manufacturing Division
Kevin H. Kerchner......................... 46 Vice President, Supply Chain Operations
Ronald M. Litchkowski..................... 42 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
Arthur C. Pisano.......................... 40 Vice President, Labor, Operations, and
Human Resources
Norman W. Alpert.......................... 41 Director
Vincent J. Buonanno....................... 55 Director
Todd N. Khoury............................ 34 Director
Leonard Lieberman......................... 71 Director
Kevin Mundt............................... 45 Director
Arthur J. Nagle........................... 61 Director
Vincent J. Naimoli........................ 61 Director
Daniel S. O'Connell....................... 46 Director
John W. Priesing.......................... 71 Director
</TABLE>
ROBERT L. ROSNER is a Managing Director of Vestar and was a founding partner
of Vestar at its inception in 1988. Mr. Rosner is Chairman of Russell-Stanley's
Board of Directors. Mr. Rosner is also a director of Remington Products Company,
L.L.C., and Sheridan Healthcare, Inc., all companies in which Vestar has a
significant equity interest. Mr. Rosner holds a B.A. from Trinity College and a
M.B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania.
DANIEL W. MILLER joined Russell-Stanley in March 1995 and was appointed
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in February 1996. Mr. Miller
was appointed Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer in
June 1996 and became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
May 1998. Prior to May 1998, Mr. Miller was also a Managing Director of Vestar
21
<PAGE>
Resources, Inc., an affiliate of Vestar, which he joined in 1993. He was
appointed President of Russell-Stanley in October 1999 and Chief Executive
Officer in March 2000. Mr. Miller's prior experience includes executive
positions at Dresser Industries, Inc., Forstmann Little & Co. and Wesray Capital
Corporation. Mr. Miller is a C.P.A. and holds a B.S. from Northern Illinois
University.
MARK E. DANIELS joined Russell-Stanley as Executive Vice President with the
acquisition of Container Management Services in 1997. Mr. Daniels founded
Container Management Services in 1991 and served as President of Container
Management Services since its inception. In 1983, Mr. Daniels founded and
managed LinTech, Inc. which provided ultra low temperature size reduction and
classification of specialty products including thermoplastics, pharmaceuticals
and foodstuffs. LinTech was sold to Tanner Chemical/Chamberlain Phipps in 1986,
where Mr. Daniels served as Division Manager from 1986 to 1991. Mr. Daniels
holds a B.S. from Lehigh University.
MICHAEL W. HUNTER joined Russell-Stanley as Executive Vice President and
President of Hunter Drums Limited with the acquisition of Hunter Drums Limited
in 1997. Mr. Hunter joined Hunter Drums Limited in 1979 and became President in
1984. Mr. Hunter holds a B.A. from the University of Western Ontario.
JOHN H. HUNTER joined Russell-Stanley in 1984 as a Vice President and was
appointed Vice President-Plastics Division in 1986. Mr. Hunter is currently Vice
President, Operations and Engineering-Container Manufacturing Division. Prior to
joining Russell-Stanley, Mr. Hunter was a Plant Manager for ACT. Mr. Hunter
holds a B.S. from the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow, Scotland.
DAVID C. GARRISON joined Russell-Stanley as Vice President, Operations in
1991. Mr. Garrison is currently Vice President, Operations, Container
Manufacturing Division. Prior to joining Russell-Stanley, Mr. Garrison was Vice
President and General Manager at Eastern Steel Barrel Corp. From 1962 to 1978,
he was employed by American Thermo Plastics Corporation, a subsidiary of
Phillips Chemical Company. Mr. Garrison holds a B.S. from Lehigh University.
KEVIN H. KERCHNER joined Russell-Stanley with its acquisition of the
plastics division of Smurfit Packaging Corporation in 1997. Mr. Kerchner is
currently Vice President, Supply Chain Operations. Prior to joining
Russell-Stanley, Mr. Kerchner was Division General Manager of Smurfit Packaging
Corporation. He has held various positions in operations, finance and planning
with Smurfit, Johnson Matthey, PLC and Container Corporation of America.
Mr. Kerchner holds a B.A. from Eastern Illinois University and a M.B.A. from
Butler University.
RONALD M. LITCHKOWSKI joined Russell-Stanley as Vice President, Controller
in 1997. He was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary in
October 1999. Prior to joining Russell-Stanley, Mr. Litchkowski was Vice
President of Finance and Administration for the Institutional Products Division
of Colgate-Palmolive Company, where he worked in various executive financial
management positions since 1989. Mr. Litchkowski is a C.P.A. and holds a B.S.
from King's College.
ARTHUR C. PISANO, JR. joined Russell-Stanley in the Sales and Marketing
Department in 1991. He was appointed Vice President, Labor, Operations, and
Human Resources in January of 2000. In his tenure with Russell-Stanley,
Mr. Pisano has held management positions of increasing responsibility in
operations, human resources and labor relations. Prior to joining
Russell-Stanley, Mr. Pisano held various operating positions with Radial
Castings. Mr. Pisano holds a B.S. from St. Thomas Aquinas College.
NORMAN W. ALPERT is a Managing Director of Vestar and was a founding partner
of Vestar at its inception in 1988. Mr. Alpert is Chairman of the Board of
Directors of Advanced Organics, Inc., and Aearo Corporation, and a director of
Cluett American Corp., Siegelgale Holdings, Inc. and Remington Products Company,
L.L.C., all companies in which Vestar has a significant equity interest.
Mr. Alpert holds an A.B. from Brown University.
22
<PAGE>
VINCENT J. BUONANNO is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tempel
Steel Company of Chicago, a producer of magnetic steel laminations.
Mr. Buonanno was the principal stockholder and President of New England
Container from 1980 until 1997 and is a trustee of Brown University.
Mr. Buonanno holds an A.B. from Brown University.
TODD N. KHOURY is a Managing Director of Vestar and joined Vestar in 1993.
Mr. Khoury is also a director of Siegelgale Holdings, Inc., and Valor
Telecommunications, all companies in which Vestar has a significant equity
interest. Mr. Khoury holds a B.A. from Yale University and a M.B.A. from Harvard
University.
LEONARD LIEBERMAN is a retired Chief Executive Officer of Supermarkets
General Corporation and Outlet Communications, Inc. Mr. Lieberman is also a
director of Advanced Organics, Inc., and Consolidated Container Company, LLC,
companies in which Vestar has a significant equity interest, Celestial
Seasonings, Inc., Sonic Corp., and Nice-Pak Products, Inc. Mr. Lieberman holds a
B.A. from Yale University, a J.D. from Columbia University and participated in
the Advanced Management Program at Harvard University.
KEVIN MUNDT is a Vice President, member of the Board of Directors, and head
of the Retail and Consumer and Financial Services practices of Mercer Management
Consulting. Prior to that, Mr. Mundt was a founding partner of Corporate
Decisions, Inc., a Boston strategy consulting firm that focused on developing
growth strategies in changing markets that later merged with Mercer. Mr. Mundt
holds an A.B. from Brown University and holds a M.B.A. from Harvard University.
ARTHUR J. NAGLE is a Managing Director of Vestar and was a founding partner
of Vestar at its inception in 1988. Mr. Nagle is a director of Advanced Organics
Holdings, Inc., Aearo Corporation, Gleason Corporation, and Remington Products
Company, L.L.C., all companies in which Vestar has a significant equity
interest. Mr. Nagle holds a B.S. from Pennsylvania State University and a M.B.A.
from Columbia University.
VINCENT J. NAIMOLI is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Anchor Industries International. Mr. Naimoli is also Managing General Partner
and Chief Executive Officer of the Tampa Bay Devil Rays, Ltd. Major League
Baseball Club and a director of Florida Progress at Players Internationa,l Inc.
Mr. Naimoli holds a B.S.M.E. from the University of Notre Dame, a M.S.M.E. from
New Jersey Institute of Technology, a M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University
and attended the Advanced Management Program at Harvard University.
DANIEL S. O'CONNELL is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Vestar.
Mr. O'Connell is a director of Aearo Corporation, Cluett American Investment
Corp., Insight Communications Company, L.P., Remington Products Company, L.L.C.,
Sheridan Healthcare, Inc., Siegelgale Holdings, Inc., and St. John Knits, Inc.,
all companies in which Vestar has a significant equity interest. Mr. O'Connell
holds an A.B. from Brown University and a M.B.A. from Yale University.
JOHN W. PRIESING is a Director of Advanced Organics Holdings, Inc., a
company in which Vestar has a significant equity interest, where he served as
Chief Executive Officer during 1999. Mr. Priesing was Russell-Stanley's Chairman
from 1993 to 1997 and President and Chief Executive Officer from 1993 to 1996.
Prior to joining Russell-Stanley, Mr. Priesing served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Axel Johnson, Inc. From 1973 to 1978, Mr. Priesing was
group vice president and director of Phelps Dodge Industries. Mr. Priesing holds
a B.A. from Amherst College and a M.B.A. from Harvard University and is Trustee
Emeritus at St. Lawrence University.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive
officers.
During 1999, Robert L. Rosner, Leonard Lieberman and Arthur J. Nagle served
on the Compensation Committee of our board of directors.
23
<PAGE>
BOARD COMPENSATION
All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending all Board
and committee meetings. Except for Mark Daniels, directors who are also
employees of ours or Vestar do not receive remuneration for serving as
directors. Mr. Daniels receives $25,000 per year for his service as a director.
Each other director of the Board receives $15,000 per year for his service as a
director, $2,000 for each meeting of the Board attended in person, $1,000 for
each meeting of the Board attended by teleconference, $1,000 for each committee
meeting attended in person and $500 for each committee meeting attended by
teleconference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth summary information concerning compensation
for services in all capacities awarded to, earned by or paid to our Chief
Executive Officer and each of our other four most highly compensated executive
officers whose aggregate cash and cash equivalent compensation exceeded $100,000
(collectively, the "Named Executive Officers"), with respect to the year ended
December 31, 1999.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
------------------------- ---------------------
AWARDS PAYOUTS
---------- --------
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING LTIP ALL OTHER
NAME AND OPTIONS PAYOUTS COMPENSATION
PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY ($) BONUS ($) (#) ($) ($)(1)
- ------------------ -------- ---------- --------- ---------- -------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Daniel W. Miller (2)...................... 1999 280,000 135,000 11,600(5)
President and Chief Executive 1998 247,308(6) 125,000(7) 15,000
Officer, Executive Vice President and 1997 116,610(8) 100,000(9) 3,650
Chief Financial Officer
Robert L. Singleton (2)................... 1999 310,000 226,000 33,859 594,839(3)
President and Chief Executive 1998 310,000 100,000 35,000 31,250 141,953(4)
Officer 1997 275,000 310,000
Mark E. Daniels........................... 1999 265,000 17,500 807,800(10)
Executive Vice President and 1998 225,000 25,000 17,500 795,000(11)
President of Container Management 1997 135,920(12) 46,875 52,897
Services
Michael W. Hunter......................... 1999 254,600(13) 94,470(14) 473,523(15)
Executive Vice President and 1998 238,319(16) 94,470(14) 17,500 473,523(15)
President of Hunter Drums Limited 1997 40,825(17) 19,916(18) 82,834(19)
John H. Hunter............................ 1999 172,000 60,000 45,146 11,066(20)
Vice President, Operations and 1998 166,000 60,000 3,000 41,667 18,889(21)
Engineering--Container Manufacturing 1997 160,000 112,500 16,188(22)
Division
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Russell-Stanley maintains a group life insurance policy under which some
employees, including all of the Named Executive Officers, receive life
insurance with a death benefit equal to the lesser of the employee's salary
and $300,000. The premiums paid in respect of any individual are not
significant.
24
<PAGE>
(2) Mr. Singleton resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer in
October 1999, at which time Mr. Miller became President and was no longer
Chief Financial Officer.
(3) Represents payment of $588,439 received by Mr. Singleton from
Russell-Stanley for the repurchase of his stock options and a contribution
of $6,400 by Russell-Stanley under Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan.
(4) Represents payment of $124,688 by Russell-Stanley in reimbursement of
expenses incurred by Mr. Singleton in connection with his relocation to New
Jersey, a contribution of $5,000 by Russell-Stanley under Russell-Stanley's
401(k) Savings Plan and a contribution of $12,265 by Russell-Stanley in 1999
under a defined contribution plan maintained by Russell-Stanley.
(5) Represents a contribution of $6,400 by Russell-Stanley under
Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan and a contribution of $5,200 by
Russell-Stanley in 1999 under a defined contribution plan maintained by
Russell-Stanley.
(6) Represents payment by Russell-Stanley of $75,000 to Vestar in consideration
for Mr. Miller's services as Russell-Stanley's Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer from January through May 1998 and the payment by
Russell-Stanley of $172,308 to Mr. Miller as salary in respect of the period
from May through December 1998.
(7) Represents a bonus of $100,000 paid by Russell-Stanley and a payment of
$25,000 from Vestar.
(8) Represents payment by Russell-Stanley of $66,129 to Vestar in consideration
for Mr. Miller's services as Russell-Stanley's Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer from July through December 1997 and the payment by
Russell-Stanley of $50,481 to Mr. Miller as salary.
(9) Represents payment by Russell-Stanley of $100,000 to Vestar in consideration
for Mr. Miller's incentive compensation.
(10) Represents payment of $770,000 by Russell-Stanley pursuant to a stay/pay
agreement, payment of $25,000 by Russell-Stanley for Mr. Daniels' service as
a director, a contribution of $10,000 by Russell-Stanley under
Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan, and a contribution of $2,800 by
Russell-Stanley in 1999 under a defined contribution plan maintained by
Russell-Stanley.
(11) Represents payment of $770,000 by Russell-Stanley pursuant to a stay/pay
agreement and payment of $25,000 by Russell-Stanley for Mr. Daniels'
services as a director.
(12) This represents Mr. Daniel's salary post acquisition only.
(13) Mr. Hunter's salary is $380,000 (Canadian) per year. The amount reflected
in the table represents this amount converted at the rate of 0.67 U.S.
dollars per Canadian dollar.
(14) Mr. Hunter's bonus for 1999 was $141,000 (Canadian). The amount reflected
in the table represents this amount converted at the rate of 0.67 U.S.
dollars per Canadian dollar.
(15) Represents payment by Russell-Stanley of $700,000 (Canadian) pursuant to a
stay/pay agreement and a contribution of $6,750 (Canadian) by Hunter under a
money purchase pension plan. The amount reflected in the table represents
this amount converted at the rate of 0.67 U.S. dollars per Canadian dollar.
(16) Mr. Hunter's salary is $355,700 (Canadian) per year. The amount reflected
in the table represents this amount converted at the rate of 0.67 U.S.
dollars per Canadian dollar.
(17) Mr. Hunter's salary is $57,500 (Canadian) post acquisition. The amount
reflected in the table represents this amount converted at the rate of 0.71
U.S. dollars per Canadian dollar.
(18) Mr. Hunter's bonus for 1997 was $28,050 (Canadian) post acquisition. The
amount reflected in the table represents this amount converted at the rate
of 0.71 U.S. dollars per Canadian dollar.
(19) Represents payment by Russell-Stanley of $116,668 (Canadian) pursuant to a
stay/pay agreement. The amount reflected in the table represents this amount
converted at the rate of 0.71 U.S. dollars per Canadian dollar.
25
<PAGE>
(20) Represents a contribution of $5,866 by Russell-Stanley under
Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan and a contribution of $5,200 by
Russell-Stanley in 1999 under a defined contribution plan maintained by
Russell-Stanley.
(21) Represents a contribution of $3,760 by Russell-Stanley under
Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan and a contribution of $15,129 in 1998
by Russell-Stanley under a defined contribution plan maintained by
Russell-Stanley.
(22) Represents a contribution of $1,921 by Russell-Stanley under
Russell-Stanley's 401(k) Savings Plan and a contribution of $14,267 in 1997
by Russell-Stanley under a defined contribution plan maintained by
Russell-Stanley.
STOCK OPTION GRANTS
During the year ended December 31, 1999, Russell-Stanley did not grant any
stock options to the Named Executive Officers.
OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END HOLDINGS
During the year ended December 31, 1999, none of the Named Executive
Officers exercised their stock options. The following table sets forth
information with respect to unexercised stock options held by each Named
Executive Officer as of December 31, 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER OF SECURITIES VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE-
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED MONEY OPTIONS AT
OPTIONS AT FISCAL FISCAL YEAR-END
YEAR-END UNEXERCISABLE/EXERCISABLE
NAME UNEXERCISABLE/EXERCISABLE (#) ($)(1)
- ---- ----------------------------- ----------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Daniel W. Miller.............................. 12,000/14,650 0/296,000
Mark E. Daniels............................... 26,369/39,219 0/0
Michael W. Hunter............................. 10,500/7,000 0/0
John H. Hunter................................ 1,800/17,200 0/592,000
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
(1) Values have been determined assuming a fair market value of $45.00 per share
of Russell-Stanley's common stock based on the most recent third-party
valuation of Russell-Stanley's equity value. Stock options become
exercisable in five equal installments commencing one year after the date of
grant and became immediately exercisable in the event of a change in control
or in an initial public offering of Russell-Stanley's common stock or other
voting securities.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
We maintain a performance unit incentive plan for key employees, including
the Named Executive Officers. During the year ended December 31, 1998,
Russell-Stanley awarded a total of 9,675 units to the Named Executive Officers
and established a target EBITDA (as defined in the plan) for the three-year
period from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2000 pursuant to the plan. In
1999, no long-term incentive plan awards were made due to the 3-year life of the
plan. In addition, Robert L. Singleton, former President and Chief Executive
Officer was awarded 2,325 units in 1998, all of which were cancelled without
payment. Each unit has a value of $100.00 if the EBITDA target is achieved. This
per unit value will be prorated down to $25.00 if less than 100% but more than
85% of the EBITDA target is achieved. The units will have no value if less than
85% of the EBITDA target is achieved. The per unit value will be prorated up to
$200.00 if the EBITDA target is exceeded by up to 25%. There is no increase in
the per unit value for achieving EBITDA in excess of 125% of the target amount.
The unit payments will be made in three equal annual installments in 2001, 2002
and 2003, provided that the relevant Named Executive Officer is employed by
Russell-Stanley on the payment
26
<PAGE>
dates. The following table sets forth information with respect to the units
granted to each Named Executive Officer.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS IN 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER PERFORMANCE
OF PERIOD THRESHOLD TARGET MAXIMUM
NAME UNITS (#) UNTIL PAYOUT ($) ($) ($)
- ---- --------- ----------------- --------- -------- --------
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Daniel W. Miller................... 2,100 January 1, 1998- 52,500 210,000 420,000
December 31, 2000
Mark E. Daniels.................... 1,875 January 1, 1998- 46,875 187,500 375,000
December 31, 2000
Michael W. Hunter.................. 1,875 January 1, 1998- 46,875 187,500 375,000
December 31, 2000
John H. Hunter..................... 1,500 January 1, 1998- 37,500 150,000 300,000
December 31, 2000
</TABLE>
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
Mark E. Daniels entered into an employment agreement with Russell-Stanley on
July 23, 1997. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Daniels received an initial annual
base salary of $225,000, subject to discretionary increases. Mr. Daniels is also
entitled to annual incentive bonuses and is eligible to participate in our
long-term incentive program. The employment agreement has an initial term of
three years which is automatically renewed for one-year periods unless 60 days
prior written notice is given by either Mr. Daniels or Russell-Stanley. In the
event Mr. Daniels' employment is terminated by Russell-Stanley without cause,
Mr. Daniels would be entitled to receive a cash lump sum payment in respect of
compensation earned but not yet paid, as well as a severance payment in an
amount equal to the sum of:
- one year's base salary and
- the product of
(1) Mr. Daniels' bonus for the fiscal year ended prior to his
termination of employment and
(2) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days passed
in the current fiscal year prior to this termination and the
denominator of which is 365.
Mr. Daniels also entered into a separate agreement with Russell-Stanley on
July 23, 1997 providing him with additional monetary incentive to remain an
employee of Container Management Services through July 23, 2000. This agreement
provides for Mr. Daniels to receive $770,000 annually through July 23, 2000. In
addition, in the event Mr. Daniels' employment is terminated by Russell-Stanley
without cause, we would continue to make these payments.
27
<PAGE>
Michael W. Hunter entered into an employment agreement with Russell-Stanley
on October 30, 1997. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Hunter received an initial
annual base salary of $345,000 (Canadian), subject to discretionary increases.
Mr. Hunter is also entitled to annual incentive bonuses and is eligible to
participate in our long-term incentive program. The employment agreement has an
initial term of five years which is automatically renewed for one-year periods
unless 60 days prior written notice is given by either Mr. Hunter or
Russell-Stanley. In the event Mr. Hunter's employment is terminated by
Russell-Stanley without cause, Mr. Hunter would be entitled to receive a cash
lump sum payment in respect of compensation earned but not yet paid, as well as
a severance payment in an amount equal to the sum of
- a multiple (ranging from 1 to 3) of one year's base salary and
- the product of
(1) the target bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which
Mr. Hunter's termination of employment occurs and
(2) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days passed
in the current fiscal year prior to his termination and the
denominator of which is 365.
Mr. Hunter also entered into a separate agreement with Hunter Drums Limited
on October 30, 1997 providing him with additional monetary incentive to remain
an employee of Hunter Drums Limited through October 30, 2003. This agreement
provides for Mr. Hunter to receive monthly payments of $58,334 (Canadian)
through October 30, 2001 and then $37,500 (Canadian) monthly thereafter, through
October 30, 2003. In addition, in the event Mr. Hunter's employment is
terminated by Russell-Stanley or Hunter Drums Limited without cause, Mr. Hunter
would be entitled to receive
- 75% of the aggregate payments remaining to be made pursuant to the
previous sentence in equal monthly installments during the first 50% of
the remaining term of the agreement and
- the remaining 25% of those aggregate payments on October 30, 2003.
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the agreement,
Mr. Hunter would be entitled to receive a single lump sum payment equal to the
present value of the remaining payments due under the agreement.
28
<PAGE>
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information concerning the beneficial
ownership shares of our common stock on December 31, 1999 by
- each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any
class of our common stock,
- each director who is a shareholder,
- our Chief Executive Officer and each of our Named Executive Officers, and
- all of our executive officers and directors as a group:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERCENTAGE OF
NUMBER OF SHARES SHARES
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER BENEFICIALLY OWNED(A) OUTSTANDING (A)
- ------------------------ --------------------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C>
5% STOCKHOLDERS
Vestar Capital Partners III, L.P............................ 1,163,637 53.55%
245 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10167
Vestar/R-S Investment, L.P.................................. 490,000 22.55%
245 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10167
New York Life Insurance Company............................. 290,909 13.39%
51 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010
Vestar Portfolio Investments, L.P........................... 29,318 1.35%
245 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10167
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Robert L. Rosner(b)......................................... -- --
Daniel W. Miller............................................ 14,650(c) *
Mark E. Daniels............................................. 39,219(d) 1.77%
Michael W. Hunter........................................... 7,000(e) *
John H. Hunter.............................................. 21,325(f) *
Norman W. Alpert(b)......................................... -- --
Vincent J. Buonanno......................................... 24,243 1.12%
Leonard Lieberman........................................... 3,160 *
Arthur J. Nagle(b).......................................... -- --
Vincent J. Naimoli.......................................... 3,160 *
Daniel S. O'Connell(b)...................................... -- --
John W. Priesing............................................ 22,000(g) 1.00%
All executive officers and directors as a group (18 139,577(h) 6.04%
persons)..................................................
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Less than one percent.
(a) The amounts and percentage of common stock beneficially owned are reported
on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the
regulations, a person is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if
that person has or shares "voting power," which includes the power to vote
or to direct the voting of that security, or "investment power," which
includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of that
security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities
of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within
60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial
owner of the same securities and a
29
<PAGE>
person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he
has no economic interest.
(b) Mr. O'Connell is the President and Chief Executive Officer and
Messrs. Rosner, Nagle and Alpert are Vice Presidents of Vestar Associates
Corporation III. Vestar Associates Corporation III is the sole general
partner of Vestar Associates III, L.P., and Vestar Associates III, L.P. is
the sole general partner of Vestar Capital Partners III, L.P., which owns
1,163,637 shares of our common stock. Messrs. O'Connell, Rosner, Nagle and
Alpert, as executive officers of Vestar Associates Corporation III, may be
deemed to share beneficial ownership of those shares. Each of these
individuals disclaims that beneficial ownership.
Messrs. Alpert, Nagle and O'Connell are general partners of Vestar/R-S
Investment, L.P. which owns 490,000 shares of our common stock.
Messrs. Alpert, Nagle and O'Connell, as general partners of Vestar/R-S
Investment, L.P., may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of those
shares. Each of these individuals disclaims that beneficial ownership.
Messrs. Alpert, Nagle and O'Connell are general partners of Vestar/MAG
Aerospace Limited Partnership. Vestar/MAG Aerospace Limited Partnership is
the sole general partner of Vestar Portfolio Investments, L.P., which owns
29,318 shares of our common stock. Messrs. Alpert, Nagle and O'Connell, as
general partners of Vestar/MAG Aerospace Limited Partnership, may be deemed
to share beneficial ownership of those shares. Each of these individuals
disclaims that beneficial ownership.
(c) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 14,650 shares of common
stock.
(d) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 39,219 shares of common
stock.
(e) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 7,000 shares of common
stock.
(f) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 17,200 shares of common
stock.
(g) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 22,000 shares of common
stock.
(h) Includes currently exercisable options to purchase 104,889 shares of common
stock.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
On July 23, 1997, we entered into a management agreement with Vestar.
Pursuant to the management agreement, Vestar provides us with advisory and
consulting services for an annual fee equal to the greater of $225,000 or 0.25%
of our net sales for that fiscal year, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket
expenses. The management agreement terminates at any time that Vestar and its
affiliates hold, in the aggregate, less than 10% of the voting power of our
outstanding voting stock. See "Ownership of Common Stock." In 1999, we paid
Vestar $773,000 in fees based on net sales for advisory and consulting services
which includes out-of-pocket expenses.
We have entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Buonanno. In
consideration for his advising us on matters relating to the steel drum
reconditioning business, we will pay Mr. Buonanno four payments of $250,000 each
prior to December 31, 2001, of which two payments were made in 1999.
New York Life Insurance Company, one of our 5% stockholders, and New York
Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, an affiliate of New York Life Insurance
Company, were lenders under our former senior credit agreement, with an
aggregate term loan commitment of $20.0 million which bore interest at 9.48% per
annum. This term loan remains outstanding under our senior credit facility
bearing the same interest rate and will mature in two equal installments in
June 2006 and June 2007. We are required to offer to repay the term loan with
the proceeds from the sale of assets and with the proceeds from issuances of our
equity securities. We can also make optional prepayments. Mandatory and optional
prepayments are subject to prepayment premiums. In connection with the execution
of our senior credit facility, we paid fees of approximately $100,000 to these
lenders.
30
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits and Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements: (see index to financial statements at page 33)
(b) Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts
(c) Exhibits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
--------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
*3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Russell-Stanley Holdings,
Inc.
*3.2 By-Laws of Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc.
*3.3 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
Russell-Stanley Corp.
*3.4 By-Laws of Russell-Stanley Corp.
*3.5 Articles of Incorporation of Container Management Services,
Inc.
*3.6 By-Laws of Container Management Services, Inc.
*3.7 Restated Articles of Incorporation of New England Container
Co., Inc.
*3.8 Amended and Restated By-Laws of New England Container
Co.,Inc.
*3.9 Articles of Incorporation of Russell-Stanley, Inc.
*3.10 By-Laws of Russell-Stanley, Inc.
*3.11 Certificate of Incorporation of RSLPCO, Inc.
*3.12 By-Laws of RSLPCO, Inc.
*3.13 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Russell-Stanley, L.P.
*3.14 Agreement of Limited Partnership of Russell-Stanley, L.P.
*4.1 Indenture, dated as of February 10, 1999, by and among
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc., the guarantors named therein
and The Bank of New York, as the Trustee
*4.2 Form of 10 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (included
as part of the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 hereto)
*10.1 Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement and
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of February 10, 1999, among
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as
borrowers, the lenders listed therein and BankBoston, N.A.
as administrative agent, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners,
L.P., as syndication agent
*10.2 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 21, 1998, among
Vincent J. Buonanno, New England Container Co., Inc. and
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc.
*10.3 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 1, 1997, among
Mark E. Daniels, Robert E. Daniels, Mark E. Daniels
Irrevocable Family Trust, R.E. Daniels Irrevocable Family
Trust, Container Management Services, Inc. and
Russell-Stanley Corp.
*10.4 Share Purchase Agreement dated as of October 24, 1997, among
Michael W. Hunter, John D. Hunter, Michael W. Hunter
Holdings Inc., John D. Hunter Holdings Inc., Hunter Holdings
Inc., 373062 Ontario Limited, Hunter Drums Limited,
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and HDL Acquisition, Inc.
*10.5 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of October 23, 1997,
among Smurfit Packaging Corporation, Russell-Stanley
Holdings, Inc. and Russell-Stanley Corp.
</TABLE>
31
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
--------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
<C> <S>
*10.6 Vestar Management Agreement dated as of July 23, 1997, among
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc., Russell-Stanley Corp.,
Container Management Services, Inc. and Vestar Capital
Partners
+*10.7 Know How and Patent Licensing Agreement between Mauser-Werke
GmbH and Russell-Stanley Corp., dated June 26, 1995
+*10.8 Licensing Agreement between Mauser-Werke GmbH and
Russell-Stanley Corp., dated June 26, 1995
+*10.9 Know How and Patent Licensing Agreement between Mauser-Werke
GmbH and Russell-Stanley Corp., dated June 26, 1995
+*10.10 Know How and Patent Licensing Agreement between Mauser-Werke
GmbH and Hunter Drums Limited, dated July 31, 1996
+*10.11 Know How and Patent Licensing Agreement between Mauser-Werke
GmbH and Hunter Drums Limited, dated July 31, 1996
+*10.12 Consent and Agreement between Hunter Drums Limited and
Mauser-Werke GmbH, dated September 29, 1997
*10.13 1998 Stock Option Plan
*10.14 Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. Management Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan 1998
*10.15 Employment Agreement, dated October 30, 1997, among
Russell-Stanley, Holdings, Inc., Hunter Drums Limited and
Michael W. Hunter
*10.16 Stay Pay Agreement, dated October 30, 1997, among
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc., Hunter Drums Limited and
Michael W. Hunter
*10.17 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 23, 1997, between
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and Mark E. Daniels
*10.18 Stay Pay Agreement, dated as of July 23, 1997, between
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and Mark E. Daniels
*10.21 Services Agreement, dated as of February 10, 1999, between
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and Vincent J. Buonanno
*10.22 License Agreement between Gallay SA and Hunter Drums
Limited, dated February 7, 1997
*10.23 License Agreement between Gallay SA and Hunter Drums
Limited, dated April 16, 1987
12 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
*21 Subsidiaries of the Company
27 Financial Data Schedule for the year ended December 31, 1999
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* This Exhibit is incorporated by reference to the Exhibit of the same
number filed as part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4
(File No. 333-76057)
+ The Registrant was afforded confidential treatment of portions of this
exhibit by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, portions
thereof have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed during the Quarter ended December 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
October 8, 1999 Resignation of Robert L. Singleton and appointment of
Daniel W. Miller as President and Ronald M. Litchkowski as
Chief Financial Officer
</TABLE>
32
<PAGE>
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PAGE
--------
<S> <C>
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998 AND
FOR EACH OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998, and
1997:
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss)........................................... 34
Consolidated Balance Sheets............................... 35
Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Preferred Stock
and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)...................... 36
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows..................... 37
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................ 38-67
Independent Auditors' Report.............................. 68
</TABLE>
33
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES................................................... $287,118 $276,624 $176,313
COST OF SALES............................................... 222,556 213,207 133,603
-------- -------- --------
Gross Profit.............................................. 64,562 63,417 42,710
-------- -------- --------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Selling..................................................... 23,965 20,114 12,254
General and administrative.................................. 24,332 22,271 12,862
Amortization of intangibles................................. 3,073 3,127 1,726
Non-recurring charges (Note 18)............................. 1,900 6,167 --
-------- -------- --------
Total expenses.............................................. 53,270 51,679 26,842
-------- -------- --------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS...................................... 11,292 11,738 15,868
INTEREST EXPENSE............................................ 21,079 16,025 8,754
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE--net................................. (119) 550 197
-------- -------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS... (9,668) (4,837) 6,917
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) PROVISION (Note 9)..................... (2,223) (505) 2,925
-------- -------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS.................... (7,445) (4,332) 3,992
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS, net of tax benefits of $508 in 1999
and $2,655 in 1997 (Note 15).............................. 763 -- 5,100
-------- -------- --------
NET LOSS.................................................... (8,208) (4,332) (1,108)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (Note 2).................. 1,438 (2,012) (171)
-------- -------- --------
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS.......................................... $ (6,770) $ (6,344) $ (1,279)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
34
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 704 $ 1,630
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $460 and $169,
respectively............................................ 30,135 29,408
Inventories (Note 3)...................................... 24,595 18,761
Prepaid taxes and income taxes receivable--net (Note 9)... 2,395 3,460
Prepaid expenses and other current assets................. 1,009 2,132
Deferred tax benefit--net (Note 9)........................ 1,247 602
-------- --------
Total current assets.................................... 60,085 55,993
-------- --------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT--net (Notes 4 and 6).......... 94,573 92,643
-------- --------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill and other intangibles-net (Note 5)............... 106,297 108,195
Deferred financing costs-net.............................. 6,892 1,294
Other noncurrent assets................................... 156 129
-------- --------
Total other assets...................................... 113,345 109,618
-------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS................................................ $268,003 $258,254
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (Notes 7 and 14).... $ 45,607 $ 42,230
Income taxes payable (Note 9)............................. 0 849
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 8)............. 0 10
-------- --------
Total current liabilities............................... 45,607 43,089
LONG TERM DEBT (Notes 8, 17, and 20)........................ 192,769 171,592
DEFERRED TAXES-net (Note 9)................................. 481 4,662
OTHER NON CURRENT LIABILITIES (Note 14)..................... 2,508 5,374
-------- --------
Total liabilities....................................... 241,365 224,717
-------- --------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 14 and 20)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY--At December 31, 1999 and 1998, 2,201
and 2,205 shares were outstanding......................... 26,638 33,537
-------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................. $268,003 $258,254
======== ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS) (NOTE 2)
REDEEMABLE ------------------------
PREFERRED COMMON MINIMUM
STOCK STOCK ADDITIONAL CUMULATIVE PENSION
------------------- -------------------- PAID-IN ACCUMULATED TRANSLATION LIABILITY
SHARES AMOUNT SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT ADJUSTMENTS ADJUSTMENT
-------- -------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1997......... 275,592 $ 27,465 645,000 $ 7 $ 7,600 $(21,305) $ -- $(295)
Net loss....................... -- -- -- -- -- (1,108) -- --
Issued as dividends............ 22,149 2,214 -- -- -- -- -- --
Reacquired by purchase......... (297,741) (29,774) (122,500) -- -- -- -- --
Amortization of discount....... -- 95 -- -- -- -- -- --
Shares issued.................. -- -- 1,627,778 16 71,984 -- -- --
Preferred stock dividends...... -- -- -- -- -- (2,525) -- --
Conversion of warrants......... -- -- 30,243 -- (1,059) -- -- --
Premium paid on repurchase of
preferred stock.............. -- -- -- -- (7,529) -- -- --
Transaction fees............... -- -- -- -- (1,907) -- -- --
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (68)
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- -- -- -- (103) --
-------- -------- --------- --- ------- -------- ------- -----
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1997....... -- -- 2,180,521 23 69,089 (24,938) (103) (363)
Net loss....................... -- -- -- -- -- (4,332) -- --
Shares issued.................. -- -- 24,243 -- 1,090 -- -- --
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (381)
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- -- -- -- (1,631) --
-------- -------- --------- --- ------- -------- ------- -----
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1998....... -- -- 2,204,764 23 70,179 (29,270) (1,734) (744)
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (8,208) -- --
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 542
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- -- -- -- 896 --
Notes paid..................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reacquired by purchase......... -- -- (4,000) -- -- -- -- --
-------- -------- --------- --- ------- -------- ------- -----
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999....... -- $ -- 2,200,764 $23 $70,179 $(37,478) $ (838) $(202)
======== ======== ========= === ======= ======== ======= =====
<CAPTION>
NOTES TREASURY TOTAL
RECEIVABLE STOCK STOCKHOLDERS'
FOR SHARES TO ------------------- EQUITY
MANAGEMENT SHARES AMOUNT (DEFICIT)
------------- -------- -------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 1997......... $(64) 117,000 $ (402) $(14,459)
Net loss....................... -- -- -- (1,108)
Issued as dividends............ -- -- -- --
Reacquired by purchase......... -- 122,500 (4,451) (4,451)
Amortization of discount....... -- -- -- --
Shares issued.................. -- -- -- 72,000
Preferred stock dividends...... -- -- -- (2,525)
Conversion of warrants......... -- -- -- (1,059)
Premium paid on repurchase of
preferred stock.............. -- -- -- (7,529)
Transaction fees............... -- -- -- (1,907)
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- (68)
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- (103)
---- ------- ------- --------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1997....... (64) 239,500 (4,853) 38,791
Net loss....................... -- -- -- (4,332)
Shares issued.................. -- -- -- 1,090
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- (381)
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- (1,631)
---- ------- ------- --------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1998....... (64) 239,500 (4,853) 33,537
Net loss -- -- -- (8,208)
Minimum pension liability
adjustment................... -- -- -- 542
Translation adjustment......... -- -- -- 896
Notes paid..................... 51 -- -- 51
Reacquired by purchase......... -- 4,000 (180) (180)
---- ------- ------- --------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999....... $(13) 243,500 $(5,033) $ 26,638
==== ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
36
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss.................................................. $ (8,208) $(4,332) $ (1,108)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation............................................ 26,998 23,479 8,475
Amortization of intangibles............................. 3,073 3,127 1,613
Amortization of deferred financing costs................ 807 276 594
Deferred income tax provision........................... (4,826) (848) (418)
Extraordinary items, noncash (Note 15).................. 1,271 -- 7,755
Other noncash items..................................... -- 770 393
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding
effects of acquisitions:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable................ (727) 1,916 (135)
Decrease (increase) in inventories........................ (5,834) 1,024 2,147
Decrease (increase) in prepaids and other current
assets.................................................. 2,188 672 (1,085)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses
and income taxes payable................................ 2,528 4,482 (1,763)
Increase (decrease) in other--net......................... (3,029) 231 1,265
-------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities............... 14,241 30,797 17,733
-------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired (Note 16).............. -- (13,874) (130,249)
Capital expenditures...................................... (28,556) (28,679) (9,949)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment....... -- 1,394 --
Other, net................................................ -- (74) (147)
-------- ------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities................... (28,556) (41,233) (140,345)
-------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term borrowings........................ 187,170 -- 282,733
Repayments of long-term borrowings........................ (161,958) (429) (144,708)
(Repayments of) borrowings under revolver credit-net...... (4,034) 11,777 (8,515)
Dividends on redeemable preferred stock................... -- -- (2)
Increase in deferred financing costs...................... (7,676) (72) (6,877)
Repurchase of senior subordinated notes................... -- -- (29,258)
Capital restructuring..................................... -- -- (42,880)
Issuance of common stock.................................. -- -- 72,000
Other, net................................................ (129) (287) 21
-------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities............... 13,373 10,989 122,514
-------- ------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS............................................... 16 26 (103)
-------- ------- --------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS..................... (926) 579 (201)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD.............. 1,630 1,051 1,252
-------- ------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD.................... $ 704 $ 1,630 $ 1,051
======== ======= ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest.................................................. $ 17,175 $12,883 $ 6,580
======== ======= ========
Income taxes.............................................. $ 1,796 $ 209 $ 2,276
======== ======= ========
</TABLE>
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
ORGANIZATION--Through its direct operating subsidiaries, Russell-Stanley
Corp. ("RSC"), Container Management Services, Inc. ("CMS"), Hunter Drums Limited
("Hunter"), and New England Container Co., Inc. ("NEC"), Russell-Stanley
Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings" or the "Company") is a leading manufacturer and
marketer of plastic and steel industrial containers and a leading provider of
related container services in the United States and Canada. The Company's
products are used in a broad range of industries including agricultural,
chemical, food product, lubricant, pharmaceutical and specialty chemicals.
In July 1997, the Company restructured its capital structure through the
following transactions, i) issuance of 1,222,221 shares of common stock in
exchange for $54,999,940, resulting in additional paid-in capital of
$54,987,718, ii) repurchase of 122,500 shares of common stock for $4,450,500,
iii) repurchase of all outstanding senior subordinated notes for $29,257,638,
including make whole payments and accrued interest of $3,025,858 and $240,080,
respectively, iv) repurchase of $15.00/$17.50 Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable
Preferred Stock (Series B) for $37,611,126, including make whole payments and
accrued interest of $7,529,123 and $302,745, respectively, and v) conversion/
repurchase of warrants for $1,059,190 (the "Capital Restructuring"). In
addition, the Company restructured its debt through the following transactions:
i) repayment of existing bank debt of $25,924,331 and ii) borrowing on a new
credit facility of $46,102,987 (the "July Debt Restructuring"). Immediately
following the Capital Restructuring and the July Debt Restructuring, Holdings
was formed to serve as a holding company for RSC and subsidiaries. The
transaction was accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests,
therefore, the financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31,
1997 include the operations of Holdings and RSC and subsidiaries as if Holdings
and RSC had been combined for the entire year. In connection with the
transaction, all RSC shares and options were exchanged for shares and options in
Holdings with the same par value and exercise price.
In July 1997, CMS was acquired; CMS pioneered the businesses of plastic
container leasing on a "per use" or "round-trip" basis and plastic container
fleet management in the United States and Canada utilizing inventory tracking
technology. In October 1997, the Company acquired the stock of Hunter, a leading
Canadian manufacturer and marketer of steel and plastic drums. In
November 1997, Holdings issued 377,779 shares of common stock in exchange for
$17,000,055, resulting in additional paid-in capital of $16,996,277, and
acquired certain assets of Smurfit Plastic Packaging Corporation ("SPP" or "SPP
Assets"), a leading manufacturer and marketer of plastic drums in the United
States. In addition, the Company entered into an amended and restated revolving
credit and term loan agreement (Notes 8 and 15). In connection with the 1997
capital transactions, $1,907,000 of legal and consulting fees were incurred and
recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
In July 1998, NEC was acquired; NEC has the largest share of the steel drum
reconditioning market in the Northeast and provided the Company with entry into
the steel drum reconditioning market.
In February 1999, the Company refinanced its revolving credit loan and term
loans by amending its senior credit facility to provide for a $75.0 million
revolving credit line (including a $15.0 million Canadian credit line in U.S.
dollars), and a $25.0 million term loan. In addition, the Company issued
$150.0 million of senior subordinated notes due February 15, 2009.
38
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION--The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
REVENUE RECOGNITION--Revenue is recognized when products are shipped or
services are provided to customers.
USE OF ESTIMATES--The preparation of these financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Estimates are used to a significant extent in determining the recoverability of
intangibles from future operations and in establishing other valuation
allowances.
CASH EQUIVALENTS--The Company considers all highly liquid investments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents and are valued at cost which approximates fair value.
INVENTORIES--Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value.
Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT--Property, plant and equipment, stated at
cost, is being depreciated for financial reporting purposes on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term,
whichever is shorter. The estimated useful lives for each class of property,
plant and equipment are as follows:
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
Buildings and improvements.......................... 15-30 years
Furniture and fixtures.............................. 3-7 years
Machinery and equipment............................. 3-10 years
Containers held for lease........................... 13-25 months
</TABLE>
The company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether events or
circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES--The excess of cost over the fair value of
net assets acquired ("goodwill") is being amortized on a straight-line basis
over its estimated useful life of 40 years. Other intangible assets, consisting
primarily of customer lists and patents, are recorded at cost and are being
amortized over the life of the related assets (up to 17 years), using the
straight-line method. Management periodically evaluates the estimated useful
lives of goodwill and other intangibles. In addition, management periodically
evaluates the recoverability of long-term assets, including goodwill, based upon
current and future anticipated income and cash flows. For the three-year period
ended December 31, 1999, there were no adjustments to the useful lives or the
carrying values of long-term assets resulting from those evaluations.
39
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS--Deferred financing costs incurred in connection
with the Company's debt restructurings are being amortized for financial
reporting purposes over the average life of the debt, using the straight-line
method.
INCOME TAXES--Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected future tax consequences attributable to the difference between the
financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis. Management periodically evaluates the available evidence
about future taxable income and other possible sources of realization of
deferred tax assets and establishes valuation allowances if necessary.
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES--The assets and liabilities of Hunter are
translated into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates, with resulting
translation gains and losses accumulated in a separate component of
stockholders' equity. Income and expense items are converted into U.S. dollars
at average rates of exchange prevailing throughout the year.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS--The Company utilizes financial instruments to limit
its exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)--The Company has adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, REPORTING COMPREHENSIVE INCOME.
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)............................... $(8,208) $(4,332) $(1,108)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment....... 896 (1,631) (103)
Minimum pension liability adjustment.......... 542 (381) (68)
------- ------- -------
Other comprehensive income (loss)............. 1,438 (2,012) (171)
------- ------- -------
Total............................................. $(6,770) $(6,344) $(1,279)
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARD--In June 1998, SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ("SFAS 133") was issued.
SFAS 133 establishes new disclosure requirements which provide a comprehensive
standard for recognition and measurement of derivatives and hedging activities.
SFAS 133 will require new disclosures, all derivatives to be recorded on the
balance sheet at fair value and establishes special accounting for certain types
of hedging activities and will take effect in 2001. Management does not believe
that SFAS 133 will have a material effect on the Company's financial condition
or results of operations.
RECLASSIFICATIONS--Certain amounts in 1998 have been reclassified to conform
to the 1999 presentation.
40
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
3. INVENTORIES
Inventory consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials............................................. $14,381 $12,435
Work-in-process........................................... 2,406 562
Finished goods............................................ 7,808 5,764
------- -------
Total..................................................... $24,595 $18,761
======= =======
</TABLE>
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Land...................................................... $ 5,570 $ 5,518
Buildings and improvements................................ 16,245 15,418
Machinery and equipment................................... 165,784 138,049
------- -------
Total..................................................... 187,599 158,985
Less accumulated depreciation............................. (93,026) (66,342)
------- -------
Total..................................................... $94,573 $92,643
======= =======
</TABLE>
Included in machinery and equipment are containers held for lease, consisting of
plastic drums and intermediate bulk containers ("IBCs") which are leased to
customers.
5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill and other intangibles consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Goodwill................................................ $118,921 $117,840
Customer lists and other intangibles.................... 2,817 2,817
Patents................................................. 293 245
-------- --------
122,031 120,902
Less accumulated amortization........................... (15,734) (12,707)
-------- --------
Total................................................... $106,297 $108,195
======== ========
</TABLE>
41
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
6. LEASES
CAPITAL LEASES--Leased equipment included in machinery and equipment
consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Leased equipment............................................ $25 $25
Less accumulated depreciation............................... (11) (7)
--- ---
Total....................................................... $14 $18
=== ===
</TABLE>
OPERATING LEASES--The Company has operating lease commitments expiring at
various dates, principally for real property, machinery and equipment, and
transportation equipment. Total lease expense amounted to $6,698,000, $4,416,000
and $1,456,000 in 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under the terms of the noncancelable operating
leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at December 31,
1999 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<S> <C>
2000........................................................ $ 4,980
2001........................................................ 4,425
2002........................................................ 3,619
2003........................................................ 2,918
2004........................................................ 2,069
Thereafter.................................................. 10,328
-------
Total....................................................... $28,339
=======
</TABLE>
7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Accounts payable.......................................... $22,549 $20,471
Accrued payroll........................................... 3,320 1,932
Accrued professional fees................................. 221 3,663
Accrued interest payable.................................. 6,975 3,909
Other accrued expenses.................................... 12,542 12,255
------- -------
Total..................................................... $45,607 $42,230
======= =======
</TABLE>
42
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
-------------------
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Senior subordinated notes............................... $148,966 $ --
Revolving credit loans and term loans................... 43,803 171,591
Capital lease obligations (Note 6)...................... -- 11
-------- --------
$192,769 $171,602
Less current maturities................................. -- 10
-------- --------
Long-term debt.......................................... $192,769 $171,592
======== ========
</TABLE>
On February 10, 1999, the Company refinanced its revolving credit loan and
term loans by amending its senior credit facility to provide for a
$75.0 million revolving credit line (including a $15.0 million Canadian credit
line in U.S. dollars), which bears interest, at the Company's election, at a
combination of domestic source and Eurodollar borrowing rates which fluctuate
based on the Company's EBITDA and debt levels, and a $25.0 million term loan,
bearing interest at 9.48% (collectively, the "Senior Credit Facility"). The
revolving credit facility matures in February 2004 and the term loan matures in
two equal installments in June 2006 and 2007. In addition, the Company issued
$150.0 million of 10.875% Senior Subordinated Notes (the "Notes") due
February 15, 2009, at 99.248%, resulting in an effective yield of 11.0%. The
Senior Credit Facility contains certain covenants and restrictions and is
secured by substantially all assets of the Company. The Notes require
semi-annual interest payments, which commenced August 15, 1999 and mature
February 2009. The Notes are subordinate to all existing and future senior
indebtedness of the Company and are unconditionally guaranteed by the domestic
subsidiaries. The Company is required to meet certain financial covenants under
the Agreements including fixed charge and leverage ratios and capital
expenditure spending limits. The Company was in compliance with all of the
financial covenants as of December 31, 1999 and throughout the year. The debt is
secured by substantially all assets of the Company. Deferred financing charges
of approximately $7.7 million were incurred in connection with the refinancing.
43
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
8. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
The Notes, revolving credit loans and term loans have the following
provisions (dollars in thousands):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST INTEREST
RATE AT, BALANCE AT, RATE AT, BALANCE AT,
DOMESTIC EURODOLLAR DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
INTEREST RATE INTEREST RATE 1999 1999 1998 1998
----------------- ----------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revolving credit loan Prime plus margin LIBOR plus margin
not less than not less than
1.25% for 1999, 2.75% for 1999,
1.00% for 1998 2.50% for 1998 8.31-9.75% $ 10,141 9.00% $ 22,837
Revolving credit Canadian prime
loan--Foreign plus margin not
less than 1.25% 7.75 8,662 -- --
--
Term Loan A-- Prime plus margin LIBOR plus margin
Domestic not less than not less than
1.00% 2.50% -- -- 9.00 35,000
Term Loan A--Foreign Prime plus margin LIBOR plus margin
not less than not less than
1.00% 2.50% -- -- 9.00 9,182
Term Loan B-- Prime plus margin LIBOR plus margin
not less than not less than
1.50% 3.00% -- -- 9.50 79,572
Term Loan C-- Fixed rate Fixed rate 9.48 25,000 9.48 25,000
Senior Subordinated
Notes Fixed rate 10.88 148,966 -- --
--
-------- --------
Total $192,769 $171,591
======== ========
</TABLE>
In addition to the interest rate provisions stated above, the Company pays a
commitment fee of .5% on the unused portion of the revolving credit line. The
Company maintains an interest rate collar in an aggregate notional principal
amount of $22.5 million to hedge interest rate risk through November 2000. Under
this collar, if the actual LIBOR rate at the specified measurement date is
greater than a ceiling rate of 7.5%, the lender pays the Company the
differential interest expense. If the actual LIBOR rate is lower than the floor
rate of 5.27%, the Company pays the lender the differential interest expense.
44
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
8. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
MATURITIES OF LONG-TERM DEBT--As of December 31, 1999, maturities of
long-term debt are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
MATURITIES OF LONG-TERM DEBT
----------------------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C>
2004................................................. $ 18,803
2005 and thereafter.................................. 173,966
--------
Total................................................ $192,769
========
</TABLE>
9. INCOME TAXES
Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary items:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S............................................ $(11,840) $(7,538) $7,063
Foreign........................................ 2,172 2,701 (146)
-------- ------- ------
Total............................................ $ (9,668) $(4,837) $6,917
======== ======= ======
</TABLE>
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Federal......................................... $ -- $ (261) $2,794
Foreign......................................... 2,246 461 79
State............................................. (14) (235) 219
------- ------- ------
Total current..................................... 2,232 (35) 3,092
------- ------- ------
Deferred:
Federal......................................... (3,293) (1,963) (211)
Foreign......................................... (1,162) 1,493 44
------- ------- ------
Total deferred.................................... (4,455) (470) (167)
------- ------- ------
Net provision (benefit) for income taxes.......... $(2,223) $ (505) $2,925
======= ======= ======
</TABLE>
45
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
9. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The difference between the effective income tax and the statutory Federal
income tax rate is explained as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Federal statutory tax rate........................ (34.0)% (34.0)% 34.0%
Goodwill amortization............................. 6.4 9.7 3.6
State taxes, net of Federal tax benefit........... (0.1) 6.3 2.0
Travel and entertainment.......................... 0.8 2.2 0.6
Foreign tax rate differential..................... 3.6 2.5 2.1
Other............................................. 0.3 2.9 --
----- ----- ------
Effective tax (benefit) rate...................... (23.0)% (10.4)% 42.3%
===== ===== ======
</TABLE>
The components of the net deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---------------------- ----------------------
DEFERRED DEFERRED DEFERRED DEFERRED
TAX TAX TAX TAX
ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES
-------- ----------- -------- -----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Current:
Accounts receivable................... $ 131 $ -- $ 76 $ --
Inventory............................. -- 686 -- 335
Prepaid expenses...................... -- 101 -- 520
Accrued expenses...................... 1,837 -- 1,255 --
Other................................. 66 -- 126 --
------ ------ ------ ------
Total current........................... $2,034 $ 787 $1,457 $ 855
====== ====== ====== ======
Noncurrent:
Property, plant and equipment......... $ -- $6,792 $ -- $6,747
Goodwill.............................. -- 1,637 -- 974
Accrued expenses...................... 589 -- 562 --
Alternative minimum tax credit........ 229 -- 180 --
Net operating loss.................... 6,836 -- 2,153 --
Other................................. 294 -- 164 --
------ ------ ------ ------
Total noncurrent........................ $7,948 $8,429 $3,059 $7,721
====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
As of December 31, 1999, the Company had a net operating loss carryover for
Federal tax purposes of $20.1 million. The carryover will expire after
December 31, 2018. The Company also had an alternative minimum tax credit
carryover of $229,000. This credit can be carried forward indefinitely.
46
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
10. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Effective January 1, 1999, the 401(k) plans for all non-union RSC, former
SPP and CMS employees were replaced with a new 401(k) savings and retirement
plan. For salary employees, there is immediate eligibility. For hourly
employees, eligibility in the plan is dependent upon the attainment of age 21,
as well as the completion of one year of service. Effective June 1, 1999, the
401(k) plan for salary NEC employees was replaced with this plan. Eligibility in
the plan for NEC employees is dependent upon the attainment of age 21. Under the
plan, the Company matches 100% of the employee's contribution, up to 4%. In
addition, the Company may contribute an annual profit sharing contribution of 1%
to 4.75% of each employee's salary, as defined, depending upon age. The
Company's total contributions to the plan for 1999 were $1,122,000.
The vesting period for the Company's match in the 401(k) plan savings and
retirement plan is 20% after the first year and each year thereafter, until the
participant becomes fully vested after a five-year period. The vesting period
for the Company's defined benefit plan and the profit sharing contribution to
the 401(k) savings and retirement plan is 20% after three years and each year
thereafter, until the participant becomes fully vested after a seven-year
period.
Prior to 1999, RSC had a defined contribution plan that covered all eligible
nonunion employees. Contributions to the defined contribution plan were based on
years of service, age and salary. Total expense for such plan was approximately
$550,000, and $515,000 for 1998 and 1997, respectively. As of January 1, 1999,
this plan was replaced with the 401(k) savings and retirement plan described
above.
The Company contributes to a defined benefit pension plan for certain union
employees. The defined benefit pension plan assets are comprised primarily of
mutual funds.
Net pension cost for this defined benefit pension plan is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost--benefits earned during the period......... $170 $141 $ 77
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation........... 120 119 89
Expected return on plan assets.......................... (77) (93) (81)
Prior service cost amortization......................... 29 29 29
(Gain)/loss amortization................................ 19 6 11
Amortization of transition obligation................... 13 13 13
---- ---- ----
Net periodic pension cost............................... $274 $215 $138
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
Assumptions used in the accounting for the plans were:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Weighted-average discount rates........................ 7.8% 6.5% 7.5%
Expected long-term rate of return on assets............ 8.5 8.5 10.5
</TABLE>
47
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
10. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
The following table sets forth the funded status and amounts recognized for
this defined benefit pension plan at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Total accumulated benefit obligation...................... $ 1,635 $ 1,851
------- -------
Projected benefit obligation for service rendered to
date.................................................... $(1,635) $(1,851)
Plan assets at fair value................................. 854 889
------- -------
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets..... (781) (962)
Prior service cost not yet recognized in net periodic
pension cost............................................ 189 218
Unrecognized portion of net obligation existing at date of
adoption of FAS No. 87.................................. 41 54
Unrecognized net loss..................................... 202 591
Adjustment to recognize minimum liability................. (432) (863)
------- -------
Accrued pension cost...................................... $ (781) $ (962)
======= =======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the change in benefit obligation and plan
assets for this defined benefit pension plan at December 31:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year................... $1,851 $1,690
Service cost.............................................. 170 141
Interest cost............................................. 120 119
Actuarial (gain)/loss..................................... (401) 242
Benefits paid............................................. (105) (341)
------ ------
Benefit obligation at end of year......................... 1,635 1,851
------ ------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of plan year....... 889 1,081
Actual return on plan assets.............................. 45 48
Employer contribution..................................... 25 101
Benefits paid............................................. (105) (341)
------ ------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year.................. 854 889
------ ------
Funded status............................................. (781) (962)
Unrecognized actuarial loss............................... 202 591
Unrecognized prior service cost........................... 189 218
Unrecognized net obligation............................... 41 54
------ ------
Net amount recognized..................................... $ (349) $ (99)
====== ======
</TABLE>
48
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
10. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:
Prepaid (Accrued) pension cost............................ $ -- $ (99)
Accrued benefit liability................................. (781) (962)
Intangible asset.......................................... 230 218
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... 202 744
------ ------
Net amount recognized..................................... $ (349) $ (99)
====== ======
</TABLE>
Hourly employees of NEC are covered under a 401(k) plan. Eligibility in the
plan is dependent upon the completion of one year of service and the attainment
of age 21. Participants can defer up to 15% of eligible compensation. Matching
contributions are provided by the employer at the rate of 10% of the participant
contributions, up to a maximum of 5% of each participant's compensation in any
plan year. Employer contributions in 1999 were $7,500.
Certain employees of Hunter (Note 16) are covered under a money purchase
pension plan. Eligibility in the plan is dependent upon the completion of one
year of service. Employees can contribute up to 3% of eligible income and
executives can contribute up to 9% of eligible income, with a maximum yearly
contribution of $6,750. Hunter matches 100% of employee and executive
contributions and these employer contributions vest after two full years as a
member of the plan. Company contributions for the periods ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997, were $83,000, $80,000 and $2,000, respectively.
Prior to 1999, the company offered all eligible RSC nonunion and certain
eligible union employees a 401(k) tax deferred savings plan. Eligibility in the
plan was dependent upon the completion of one year of service. The company
matched 50% of the employees' contributions, up to 4%. The company's
contribution for 1998 and 1997 was $198,000 and $186,000, respectively. As of
January 1, 1999 this plan was replaced with the 401(k) savings and retirement
plan described above.
Pursuant to the acquisition of the SPP Assets, formerly a division of
Jefferson Smurfit Corporation ("JSC") (Note 16), salaried, union and non-union
employees of SPP continued to be covered under defined benefit plans and 401(k)
plans maintained by JSC for the remainder of 1997. The Company paid JSC $70,000
for the expenses JSC incurred relating to the maintenance of these plans for the
period in 1997 subsequent to the acquisition. Effective January 1, 1999, these
employees were transferred to a retirement plan established by the Company.
11. RELATED PARTIES
The Company has a management agreement with Vestar Capital Partners, Inc.,
together with its affiliates ("Vestar"), a majority shareholder of the Company,
which provides the Company with certain management services for the greater of
$225,000 per year or .25% of the consolidated net sales of the Company, plus
out-of-pocket expenses. For the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997,
the Company paid $773,000, $952,000 and $561,000, respectively, for these
services. In conjunction with the
49
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
11. RELATED PARTIES (CONTINUED)
1997 acquisitions and restructurings and the 1998 acquisition, Vestar was paid
transaction fees of approximately $2.4 million and $160,000, respectively.
Prior to May 1998, the Company's former Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, who was also one of the Company's directors, was a Managing
Director of Vestar Resources, Inc., an affiliate of Vestar. Between
February 1996, when he became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
and May 1998, when he became a full-time employee of the Company, we paid Vestar
at the rate of $150,000 per year for his services as our Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to this arrangement, we paid Vestar
$75,000 in respect of these services for the period from January 1998 through
May 1998. He is currently President and Chief Executive Officer of the company.
One of the Company's directors is a Vice President, member of the Board of
Directors and head of the Retail and Consumer and Financial Services practices
of Mercer Management Consulting ("Mercer"). In 1998, the Company engaged Mercer
to provide consulting services to CMS, for which the Company paid Mercer
approximately $189,000. In 1998, the Company also engaged Mercer to provide
consulting services to the Company, for which the Company paid Mercer
approximately $272,000.
In June 1998, the Company made an interest-free loan in the amount of
$77,000 to one of the executive officers, in connection with his relocation to
the headquarters in Bridgewater, New Jersey. The loan was repaid in full in
August 1998.
In 1999 the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Buonanno,
one of the directors. In consideration for his advice on matters relating to the
steel drum reconditioning business, the Company will pay Mr. Buonanno four
payments of $250,000 each prior to December 31, 2001. Two such payments were
made in 1999.
New York Life Insurance Company, one of the Company's 5% stockholders, and
New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corporation, an affiliate of New York Life
Insurance Company, were lenders under the Company's senior credit agreement,
with an aggregate term loan commitment of $20.0 million which bore interest at
9.48% per annum. The term loan remains outstanding under the Company's new
senior credit facility bearing the same interest rate and will mature in two
equal installments in June 2006 and June 2007. In connection with the execution
of the new senior credit facility, the Company paid fees of approximately
$100,000 to these lenders.
12. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
During 1998, the Company established a new performance unit incentive plan
for certain key employees to cover the three-year period ended December 31,
2000. Under the new plan 27,925 units were awarded to the participants of the
plan in 1998. The value of each unit is dependent upon the Company's achievement
of certain EBITDA levels, as defined, for the three-year period ended
December 31, 2000. The Company recognizes expense in relation to this plan based
on the estimate of the final payout of the plan. Accordingly, the Company
recognized expense of $233,000 in 1999 and 1998.
50
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
12. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (CONTINUED)
Under an earlier performance unit incentive plan for certain key employees,
the Company recognized expense of $467,000 in 1997. The final amount to be paid
under this plan is $210,000, plus interest, which will be paid in 2000.
13. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCK
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK--In conjunction with the Capital Restructuring
all redeemable preferred stock was repurchased and cancelled in July 1997
(Note 1).
COMMON STOCK--The par value of the Company's common stock is $0.01. There
were 3,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at December 31, 1999 and 1998.
In 1989, common stock was issued to two of the Company's management in exchange
for notes receivable totaling $64,000. One of the notes was paid in full in
January 1999. Simple interest accrues at 9% per annum on the remaining note and
the principal plus interest becomes due and payable in full in June 2004. Total
principal and interest due on the notes was $26,000 and $119,000 at
December 31, 1999 and 1998 respectively.
The shares of the Company's common stock issued to directors and management
investors are subject to various restrictions on transferability and the Company
has the right to repurchase such shares under certain circumstances.
During 1997, the Company repurchased substantially all outstanding warrants,
originally issued in 1989, in conjunction with the Capital Restructuring
(Note 1).
The Company maintains a stock option plan which provides for the granting of
stock options to certain officers and key employees. Information relating to the
option plan is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Options outstanding at January 1............................ 253,276 174,679 92,988
Options forfeited........................................... (68,988) (46,953) (1,000)
Options granted............................................. -- 125,550 82,691
------- ------- -------
Options outstanding at December 31.......................... 184,288 253,276 174,679
------- ------- -------
Options exercisable at December 31.......................... 99,979 75,430 65,669
------- ------- -------
Weighted average exercise price of options outstanding...... $ 37.80 $ 34.44 $ 19.58
Weighted average exercise price of options forfeited........ $ 35.71 $ 28.63 $ 8.00
Weighted average exercise price of options granted.......... $ -- $ 50.40 $ 42.87
Weighted average remaining contractual life................. 8 years 9 years 8 years
Weighted average exercise price of options exercisable...... $ 28.56 $ 17.12 $ 8.59
</TABLE>
No options expired or were exercised during any of the years presented. A
grant of 6,000 options with an exercise price of $8.00 per share issued in 1989
was extended to 2005.
Common stock acquired in accordance with the stock option agreement is not
transferable except as provided in the Stockholders' Transfer Rights Agreement
or pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the provisions of
the Securities Act of 1933.
51
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
13. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND COMMON STOCK (CONTINUED)
The 84,309 nonvested options at December 31, 1999 will become vested over
the following periods: 52,440 vest evenly over four years commencing in
February 2000; 12,000 vest evenly over four years commencing in May 2000; 15,869
vest in July 2000; and 4,000 vest evenly over four years commencing in
August 2000. All options must be exercised, or will expire, within 10 years of
the date of the grant. In addition, in the event of a change in control, all
options vest.
The Company accounts for the stock option plan in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES, under
which no compensation cost has been recognized for stock option awards. However,
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, ACCOUNTING FOR
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION ("SFAS 123"), the Company must disclose the pro forma
net income as if the Company had adopted the accounting requirements of
SFAS 123. Based on the Minimum Value Method of SFAS 123, the Company's pro forma
net (loss) for 1999, 1998 and 1997 would have been $(8,353,000), $(4,588,000),
and $(1,263,000), respectively.
The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using the Minimum Value Method with the following weighted average assumptions
used for grants:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Risk-free interest rate............................... 5.00% 6.00% 6.75%
Expected dividend yield............................... 0 0 0
Expected life in years................................ 5 5 5
Expected volatility................................... 0 0 0
</TABLE>
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain employees,
through its acquisitions, whereby the Company is committed to provide employment
and reimbursement for specified expenses providing the employees comply with the
provisions of said agreements. Future minimum payments under these agreements as
of December 31, 1999 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(IN THOUSANDS)
--------------
<S> <C>
2000........................................................ $1,285
2001........................................................ 515
2002........................................................ 330
2003........................................................ 330
------
Total....................................................... $2,460
======
</TABLE>
The above future payments were recorded in conjunction with purchase
accounting; $1,285,000 is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses at
both December 31, 1999 and 1998, and $1,175,000 and $2,460,000 is included in
other noncurrent liabilities at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
In January 1999, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA")
confirmed the presence of contaminants, including dioxin, in and along the
Woonasquatucket River in Rhode Island. Prior to 1970, NEC operated a facility in
North Providence, Rhode Island along the Woonasquatucket River at
52
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
a site where contaminants have been found. New England Container and the current
owners of the property have been formally identified by the EPA as potentially
responsible parties, with the site added to the National Priority Superfund Site
list in February 2000. Although New England Container no longer operates the
facility, and did not operate the facility at the time the Company acquired the
outstanding capital stock of NEC in July 1999, NEC could incur liability under
Federal and state environmental laws and/or as a result of civil litigation. The
Company believes that any resulting liability is subject to a contractual
indemnity from Vincent J. Buonanno, one of its directors and the former owner of
NEC. This indemnity is subject to a $2.0 million limit. The Company is currently
unable to estimate the likelihood or extent of any liability; however, this
matter may result in liability to NEC that could have a material adverse effect
on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.
The Company is also party to various claims, legal actions, complaints and
union negotiations arising in the ordinary course of business. In management's
opinion, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
15. EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS
The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the debt refinancings to
repay its pre-existing debt. As a result of this early extinguishment of debt,
the Company incurred extraordinary charges in both July and November 1997,
totaling approximately $5.1 million, net of tax benefits of $2.7 million,
consisting of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs and premium
payments on the repurchase of senior subordinated notes. The Company also
incurred extraordinary charges in February 1999 totaling approximately $763,000,
net of tax benefits, consisting of the write-off of unamortized deferred
financing costs.
16. ACQUISITIONS
In July 1997, the Company acquired CMS, which pioneered the businesses of
plastic container leasing on a per use or round-trip basis and plastic container
fleet management in the United States and Canada utilizing inventory tracking
technology. The purchase price of the stock acquisition was $32.5 million, plus
transaction-related expenses. The former owner was granted options to purchase
48,088 shares of Holdings common stock at $45 per share vesting over three
years.
In October 1997, the Company acquired Hunter, a leading manufacturer and
marketer of plastic and steel drums in Canada. The purchase price of the stock
acquisition was $23.7 million, plus transaction related expenses and 27,778
shares of nonvoting exchangeable stock, exchangeable into 27,778 shares of
Holdings common stock valued at $45 per share. The non-voting exchangeable stock
is exchangeable upon the occurrence of specific events, but in any event no
later than October 2004. Such shares have been treated as outstanding shares of
Holdings in the accompanying financial statements.
In November 1997, the Company acquired certain assets of SPP, formerly a
division of Jefferson Smurfit Corporation, a leading manufacturer and marketer
of plastic drums in the United States. The assets were acquired for
$70.0 million, plus transaction-related expenses.
In July 1998, the Company acquired NEC. NEC has a large share of the steel
drum reconditioning market in the Northeast and provides the Company entry into
the steel drum reconditioning market.
53
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
16. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
The purchase price of the stock acquisition was $14.0 million, plus
transaction-related expenses and 24,243 shares of common stock valued at $45 per
share.
All of these transactions (collectively, the "Acquisitions"), have been
accounted for as purchases, and, accordingly, the purchase prices were allocated
to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on estimated fair
values at the respective dates of acquisition. The excess purchase price over
the net assets and liabilities acquired was allocated to goodwill which is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of 40 years.
The results of operations of the Acquisitions have been included in the
consolidated financial statements since the respective dates of acquisition.
The following represents the cash flow details of the Acquisitions:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1998 1997
-------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Fair value of assets acquired............................ $18,329 $160,234
Less liabilities assumed................................. 3,264 27,874
Less common stock issued................................. 1,091 1,250
------- --------
Cash paid for acquisitions............................... 13,974 131,110
Less cash acquired....................................... 100 861
------- --------
Total.................................................. $13,874 $130,249
======= ========
</TABLE>
17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED DISCLOSURES
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS--The Company does not enter into
financial instruments for trading purposes. For cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and payable and accrued expenses, the carrying amount
approximates fair value due to their short maturities. The fair values of
long-term debt are estimated based on the borrowing rates currently available
for borrowings with similar terms and maturities. At December 31, 1999 and 1998,
the carrying amount approximates fair value based on current borrowing rates.
The fair value of the interest rate collar was not material at either
December 31, 1999 or 1998. There were no foreign exchange contracts in place at
December 31, 1999. Foreign exchange contracts were recorded at a fair value of
$342,000 at December 31, 1998. Included in other (income) expense-net for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, was a gain of $101,700 and a loss of
$629,000, respectively, on these foreign exchange contracts.
18. NON-RECURRING CHARGES
In conjunction with the integration of acquired entities and expansion of
the Company's operations, a plan was developed to streamline the Company's
operations and sales forces and to consolidate and relocate the Company's
corporate headquarters in order to improve operating efficiencies and reduce
costs. As part of this plan, the Company recorded non-recurring charges of
approximately $3.5 million during the year ended December 31, 1998. These
charges primarily include costs related to the closure of a container
manufacturing facility, severance and other personnel related costs, such as the
relocation of our corporate headquarters and other miscellaneous costs.
Non-recurring charges for the year ended December 31, 1998 also include
$2.7 million of costs associated with proposed acquisitions that were not
consummated. In 1999, we developed a plan to
54
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
18. NON-RECURRING CHARGES (CONTINUED)
further streamline operations as a result of our change in management. We
recorded approximately $1.9 million of non-recurring charges in 1999 that
related to severance and other personnel related costs. The liabilities accrued
for the restructuring, integration and other costs are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEVERANCE PLANT AND
AND OTHER HEADQUARTERS
PERSONNEL- CLOSURE/ COSTS FOR
RELATED RELOCATION PROPOSED
COSTS COSTS OTHER ACQUISITIONS TOTAL
---------- ------------ -------- ------------ --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1998 NON-RECURRING
Initial liability assumed.................... $2,166 $1,239 $62 $2,700 $6,167
Cash expenditures, 1998...................... 681 876 31 400 1,988
------ ------ --- ------ ------
Balance, December 31, 1998................... 1,485 363 31 2,300 4,179
------ ------ --- ------ ------
Cash expenditures, 1999...................... 1,176 -- -- 2,300 3,476
------ ------ --- ------ ------
Balance, December 31, 1999................... $ 309 $ 363 $31 $ -- $ 703
====== ====== === ====== ======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SEVERANCE
AND OTHER
PERSONNEL-
RELATED
COSTS
----------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999 NON-RECURRING
Initial liability assumed.................... $1,900
Cash expenditures, 1999...................... 899
------
Balance, December 31, 1999................... $1,001
======
</TABLE>
The severance and other personnel-related costs related to the 1998 charges
are comprised of $1,392,000 of severance costs arising from the elimination of
10 positions at the corporate headquarters and 36 positions at a containers
manufacturing facility. Other personnel costs consist of $645,000 of employee
relocation expenses and $129,000 of employee placement fees relating to the
relocation of corporate headquarters and the closure of a containers
manufacturing facility.
The containers manufacturing facility closure and corporate headquarters
relocation costs in 1998 consist of $1,089,000 of lease termination charges and
$150,000 of impairment charges to write off the net book value of leasehold
improvements abandoned in conjunction with the relocation of corporate
headquarters and the closure of the containers manufacturing facility.
In addition, professional fees of $2.7 million were incurred during 1998
associated with proposed acquisitions that were not consummated.
The severance costs related to the 1999 charges of $1.9 million relate to
the elimination of six corporate positions.
55
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
19. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company adopted SFAS No. 131, DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN
ENTERPRISE AND RELATED INFORMATION, during 1999. SFAS 131 establishes standards
for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial
statements. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products
and services, geographic areas and major customers. Operating segments are
defined as components of an enterprise for which separate, discrete financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating
decision maker, to make decisions about resources to be allocated and to assess
its performance.
The Company has two reportable operating segments. Containers manufactures
and sells new plastic and steel rigid industrial containers. Services leases
plastic rigid industrial containers, provides plastic container fleet management
services, reconditions and sells steel drums and retrieves and recycles empty
industrial containers.
Information as to the operations of the Company's business segments is set
forth below based on the nature of the products and services offered. The
Company evaluates performance based on several factors, of which the primary
financial measure is business segment profit or loss from operations before
amortization of intangible assets, depreciation, interest, income taxes and
extraordinary items. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as
those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (Note 2).
Intersegment sales are recorded at cost plus applicable margin and are
eliminated upon consolidation.
56
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
19. SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales:
Containers................................................ $229,886 $232,274 $164,407
Services.................................................. 62,217 46,650 15,206
-------- -------- --------
292,103 278,924 179,613
Intersegment sales:
Containers................................................ 4,985 2,300 3,300
Services.................................................. -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
4,985 2,300 3,300
Net sales:
Containers................................................ 224,901 229,974 161,107
Services.................................................. 62,217 46,650 15,206
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated net sales...................................... $287,118 $276,624 $176,313
======== ======== ========
Earnings before amortization, depreciation, interest, income
taxes and extraordinary items:
Containers................................................ $ 28,506 $ 23,453 $ 20,654
Services.................................................. 12,976 14,341 5,105
-------- -------- --------
41,482 37,794 25,759
Interest expense............................................ 21,079 16,025 8,754
Depreciation and amortization expense....................... 30,071 26,606 10,088
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary items....................................... $ (9,668) $ (4,837) $ 6,917
======== ======== ========
Depreciation and amortization expense:
Containers................................................ $ 11,944 $ 11,617 $ 6,728
Services.................................................. 18,127 14,989 3,360
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense.......... $ 30,071 $ 26,606 $ 10,088
======== ======== ========
Segment assets:
Containers................................................ $195,942 $188,376 $200,305
Services.................................................. 68,586 64,902 43,727
Other..................................................... 3,475 4,976 1,498
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated segment assets................................. $268,003 $258,254 $245,530
======== ======== ========
Capital expenditures:
Containers................................................ $ 7,795 $ 10,484 $ 5,655
Services.................................................. 20,761 18,195 4,294
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated capital expenditures........................... $ 28,556 $ 28,679 $ 9,949
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
57
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
19. SEGMENT REPORTING (CONTINUED)
Net sales by geographic area, as determined by the location of customer, are
as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales by geographic area:
United States............................................. $273,445 $259,732 $172,310
Canada.................................................... 12,795 15,490 4,003
Other countries........................................... 878 1,402 --
-------- -------- --------
Total....................................................... $287,118 $276,624 $176,313
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
Long-lived assets by geographic area, consisting of property, plant and
equipment--net and goodwill and other intangibles--net, as determined by
location of the asset, is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Long-lived assets--net by geographic area:
United States............................................. $176,382 $177,345 $162,044
Canada.................................................... 24,488 23,493 26,652
-------- -------- --------
Total....................................................... $200,870 $200,838 $188,696
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
The Company does not have a single customer which represents 10 percent or
more of consolidated revenues.
20. GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES
The Company's payment obligations under the Notes are fully,
unconditionally, jointly and severally guaranteed by its current domestic
subsidiaries, principally: RSC, CMS, and NEC (collectively, the "Guarantor
Subsidiaries"). Each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries is a direct or indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company's payment obligations under
the Notes will not be guaranteed by the remaining subsidiary, Hunter (the
"Non-Guarantor Subsidiary"). The obligations of each Guarantor Subsidiary under
their guarantee of the Notes are subordinated to each subsidiary's obligations
under their guarantee of the Senior Credit Facility.
Presented below is condensed combining financial information for the Parent
Company, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiary. In the
Company's opinion, separate financial statements and other disclosures
concerning each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries would not provide additional
information that is material to investors. Therefore, the Guarantor Subsidiaries
are combined in the presentation below.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for by the Company on the equity
method of accounting. Earnings of subsidiaries are, therefore, reflected in the
Company's investments in and advances to/from subsidiaries account and earnings
(losses). The elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries, related
stockholders' equity and other intercompany balances and transactions.
58
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES........................... $ -- $250,658 $37,372 $ (912) $287,118
COST OF SALES....................... -- 196,129 27,339 (912) 222,556
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
GROSS PROFIT........................ -- 54,529 10,033 -- 64,562
TOTAL EXPENSES...................... -- 47,367 5,903 -- 53,270
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS.............. -- 7,162 4,130 -- 11,292
EQUITY LOSS......................... (6,134) -- -- 6,134 --
INTEREST EXPENSE.................... 2,136 17,634 1,309 -- 21,079
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE--net......... -- (768) 649 -- (119)
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEM............ (8,270) (9,704) 2,172 6,134 (9,668)
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME
TAXES............................. (825) (2,482) 1,084 -- (2,223)
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY
ITEM.............................. (7,445) (7,222) 1,088 6,134 (7,445)
EXTRAORDINARY ITEM,
net of tax........................ 763 -- -- -- 763
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
NET INCOME (LOSS)................... $(8,208) $ (7,222) $ 1,088 $6,134 $ (8,208)
======= ======== ======= ====== ========
</TABLE>
59
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES........................... $ -- $240,874 $35,750 $ -- $276,624
COST OF SALES....................... -- 187,550 25,657 -- 213,207
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
GROSS PROFIT........................ -- 53,324 10,093 -- 63,417
TOTAL EXPENSES...................... -- 46,252 5,427 -- 51,679
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS.............. -- 7,072 4,666 -- 11,738
EQUITY LOSS......................... (2,876) -- -- 2,876 --
INTEREST EXPENSE.................... 2,185 12,505 1,335 -- 16,025
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE--net......... -- (79) 629 -- 550
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES... (5,061) (5,354) 2,702 2,876 (4,837)
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME
TAXES............................. (729) (1,034) 1,258 -- (505)
------- -------- ------- ------ --------
NET INCOME (LOSS)................... $(4,332) $ (4,320) $ 1,444 $2,876 $ (4,332)
======= ======== ======= ====== ========
</TABLE>
60
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
NET SALES........................... $ -- $170,673 $5,640 $ -- $176,313
COST OF SALES....................... -- 129,267 4,336 -- 133,603
------- -------- ------ ------- --------
GROSS PROFIT........................ -- 41,406 1,304 -- 42,710
TOTAL EXPENSES...................... -- 25,924 918 -- 26,842
------- -------- ------ ------- --------
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS.............. -- 15,482 386 -- 15,868
EQUITY INCOME....................... 1,648 -- -- (1,648) --
INTEREST EXPENSE.................... 898 7,625 231 -- 8,754
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE--net......... -- (104) 301 -- 197
------- -------- ------ ------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
AND EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS........... 750 7,961 (146) (1,648) 6,917
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME
TAXES............................. (305) 3,107 123 -- 2,925
------- -------- ------ ------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORDINARY
ITEMS............................. 1,055 4,854 (269) (1,648) 3,992
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS, net of tax..... 2,163 2,937 -- -- 5,100
------- -------- ------ ------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS)................... $(1,108) $ 1,917 $ (269) $(1,648) $ (1,108)
======= ======== ====== ======= ========
</TABLE>
61
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1999
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents......... $ -- $ 704 $ -- $ -- $ 704
Accounts receivable--net.......... -- 25,594 4,541 -- 30,135
Inventories....................... -- 20,497 4,098 -- 24,595
Prepaid and other current
assets--net..................... -- 884 292 3,475 4,651
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Total current assets............ -- 47,679 8,931 3,475 60,085
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT--net.................... -- 88,301 6,272 -- 94,573
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill and other
intangibles--net................ -- 88,328 17,969 -- 106,297
Deferred financing costs--net..... -- 6,892 -- -- 6,892
Other noncurrent assets........... -- 156 -- -- 156
Intercompany advances............. 18,655 27,150 131 (45,936) --
Investment in subsidiaries........ 31,544 -- -- (31,544) --
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS........................ $50,199 $258,506 $33,303 $(74,005) $268,003
======= ======== ======= ======== ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses........................ $(3,395) $ 34,429 $ 6,277 $ 8,296 $ 45,607
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Current maturities of long-term
debt............................ -- -- -- -- --
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Total current liabilities......... (3,395) 34,429 6,277 8,296 45,607
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
LONG-TERM DEBT...................... 19,997 164,110 8,662 -- 192,769
DEFERRED TAXES--net................. (749) 4,678 1,123 (4,571) 481
OTHER NON CURRENT LIABILITIES....... -- 2,030 1,020 (542) 2,508
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
Total liabilities............... 15,853 205,247 17,082 3,183 241,365
INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES............... -- 38,655 7,281 (45,936) --
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.......... 34,346 14,604 8,940 (31,252) 26,638
------- -------- ------- -------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY............................ $50,199 $258,506 $33,303 $(74,005) $268,003
======= ======== ======= ======== ========
</TABLE>
62
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash.............................. $ -- $ 1,246 $ 384 $ -- $ 1,630
Accounts receivable--net.......... -- 26,263 3,226 (81) 29,408
Inventories....................... -- 16,354 2,407 -- 18,761
Prepaid and other current
assets--net..................... -- 2,412 398 3,384 6,194
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total current assets.............. -- 46,275 6,415 3,303 55,993
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT--net.................... -- 86,720 5,923 -- 92,643
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill and other
intangibles--net................ -- 91,869 17,570 (1,244) 108,195
Deferred financing costs--net..... 1,294 -- -- -- 1,294
Other noncurrent assets........... -- 129 -- -- 129
Intercompany advances............. 21,434 76,033 390 (97,857) --
Investment in subsidiaries........ 37,788 -- -- (37,788) --
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS........................ $60,516 $301,026 $30,298 $(133,586) $258,254
======= ======== ======= ========= ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses........................ $(2,149) $ 37,767 $ 4,336 $ 3,125 $ 43,079
Current maturities of long-term
debt............................ -- 10 -- -- 10
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total current liabilities......... (2,149) 37,777 4,336 3,125 43,089
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
LONG-TERM DEBT...................... 19,997 142,413 9,182 -- 171,592
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
DEFERRED TAXES--net................. -- 2,331 2,331 -- 4,662
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES........ -- 4,714 1,410 (750) 5,374
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total liabilities................. 17,848 187,235 17,259 2,375 224,717
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES............... -- 90,252 6,790 (97,042) --
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.......... 42,668 23,539 6,249 (38,919) 33,537
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY............................ $60,516 $301,026 $30,298 $(133,586) $258,254
======= ======== ======= ========= ========
</TABLE>
63
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents......... $ -- $ 829 $ 222 $ -- $ 1,051
Accounts receivable--net.......... -- 25,739 4,029 (127) 29,641
Inventories....................... -- 17,022 1,982 -- 19,004
Prepaid and other current
assets--net..................... 1,082 2,633 229 1,557 5,501
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total current assets.............. 1,082 46,223 6,462 1,430 55,197
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT--net.................... -- 78,481 6,481 -- 84,962
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill and other
intangibles--net................ -- 83,563 20,171 -- 103,734
Deferred financing costs--net..... 1,498 -- -- -- 1,498
Other noncurrent assets........... -- 139 -- -- 139
Intercompany advances............. 21,418 73,560 -- (94,978) --
Investment in subsidiaries........ 42,453 -- -- (42,453) --
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
TOTAL ASSETS........................ $66,451 $281,966 $33,114 $(136,001) $245,530
======= ======== ======= ========= ========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses........................ $(1,643) $ 28,510 $ 5,941 $ 1,430 $ 34,238
Current maturities of long-term
debt............................ -- 745 -- -- 745
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total current liabilities......... (1,643) 29,255 5,941 1,430 34,983
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
LONG-TERM DEBT...................... 19,997 130,620 10,000 -- 160,617
DEFERRED TAXES--net................. 1,306 3,971 542 -- 5,819
OTHER NON CURRENT LIABILITIES....... -- 3,011 2,309 -- 5,320
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
Total liabilities................. 19,660 166,857 18,792 1,430 206,739
INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES............... -- 87,284 7,694 (94,978) --
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.......... 46,791 27,825 6,628 (42,453) 38,791
------- -------- ------- --------- --------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY............................ $66,451 $281,966 $33,114 $(136,001) $245,530
======= ======== ======= ========= ========
</TABLE>
64
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income......................... $(8,208) $(7,222) $1,088 $6,134 $(8,208)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Equity loss............................... 6,134 -- -- (6,134) --
Depreciation and amortization............. 807 28,738 1,333 -- 30,878
Extraordinary item........................ 1,271 -- -- -- 1,271
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities............................. (4) (8,973) (723) -- (9,700)
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities.............................. -- 12,543 1,698 -- 14,241
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES... -- (27,727) (829) -- (28,556)
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING
ACTIVITIES.............................. -- 14,961 (1,588) -- 13,373
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................... -- -- 16 -- 16
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS... -- (223) (703) -- (926)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF
PERIOD.................................. -- 1,245 385 -- 1,630
------- ------- ------ ------ -------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD.................................. $ -- $ 1,022 $ (318) $ -- $ 704
======= ======= ====== ====== =======
</TABLE>
65
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income......................... $(4,332) $ (4,320) $ 1,444 $ 2,876 $ (4,332)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Equity loss............................. 2,876 -- -- (2,876) --
Depreciation and amortization........... 276 25,301 1,305 -- 26,882
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities........................... 1,252 9,058 (2,063) -- 8,247
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by operating
activities.......................... 72 30,039 686 -- 30,797
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES... -- (40,690) (543) -- (41,233)
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING
ACTIVITIES.............................. (72) 11,067 (6) -- 10,989
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................... -- -- 26 -- 26
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS... -- 416 163 -- 579
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF
PERIOD.................................. -- 829 222 -- 1,051
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD.................................. $ -- $ 1,245 $ 385 $ -- $ 1,630
======= ======== ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
66
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARENT GUARANTOR NON-GUARANTOR
COMPANY SUBSIDIARIES SUBSIDIARY ELIMINATIONS CONSOLIDATED
-------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income....................... $(1,108) $ 1,917 $ (269) $(1,648) $ (1,108)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income
to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Equity income......................... (1,648) -- -- 1,648 --
Depreciation and amortization......... 196 10,222 264 -- 10,682
Extraordinary items................... 3,277 4,478 -- -- 7,755
Other noncash items................... -- 200 193 -- 393
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities......................... (1,419) 1,465 (35) -- 11
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
Net cash provided by operating
activities........................ (702) 18,282 153 -- 17,733
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES... (7,000) (115,823) (17,522) -- (140,345)
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING
ACTIVITIES.............................. 7,702 97,118 17,694 -- 122,514
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.................... -- -- (103) -- (103)
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS... -- (423) 222 -- (201)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF
PERIOD.................................. -- 1,252 -- -- 1,252
------- -------- ------- ------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD.................................. $ -- $ 829 $ 222 $ -- $ 1,051
======= ======== ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>
67
<PAGE>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To the Board of Directors of
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc.
Bridgewater, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Russell-Stanley Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income (loss), redeemable preferred stock and
stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999. Our audits also include the financial
statement schedule listed in the index at Item 14. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 3, 2000
68
<PAGE>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 1998 AND 1997
(IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
-------- ---------- --------------------- ---------- ----------
ADDITIONS
---------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING COSTS AND END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD EXPENSES OTHER DEDUCTIONS OF PERIOD
----------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts.................. $ 169 $ -- $291 $ -- $ 460
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Accumulated amortization of goodwill and other
intangibles.................................... $12,707 $2,975 $ 52 $ -- $15,734
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
For the year ended December 31, 1998
Allowance for doubtful accounts.................. $ 224 $ -- $(55) $ -- $ 169
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Accumulated amortization of goodwill and other
intangibles.................................... $ 9,580 $3,127 $ -- $ -- $12,707
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
For the year ended December 31, 1997
Allowance for doubtful accounts.................. $ 55 $ -- $169 $ -- $ 224
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Accumulated amortization of goodwill and other
intangibles.................................... $ 7,967 $1,613 $ -- $ -- $ 9,580
======= ====== ==== ====== =======
</TABLE>
69
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 30, 2000.
<TABLE>
<S> <C> <C>
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC.
By: /s/ DANIEL W. MILLER
-----------------------------------------
Daniel W. Miller, President and Chief
Executive Officer
</TABLE>
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on the 30th day of March, 2000
by the following persons in the capacities indicated:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<C> <S>
/s/ DANIEL W. MILLER President and Chief Executive Officer,
------------------------------------------- Assistant Secretary, and Director (principal
Daniel W. Miller executive officer)
/s/ RONALD M. LITCHKOWSKI Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
------------------------------------------- Treasurer, and Secretary (principal
Ronald M. Litchkowski financial and accounting officer)
/s/ MARK E. DANIELS
------------------------------------------- Executive Vice President and Director
Mark E. Daniels
/s/ MICHAEL W. HUNTER
------------------------------------------- Executive Vice President and Director
Michael W. Hunter
/s/ ROBERT L. ROSNER
------------------------------------------- Chairman of the Board of Directors
Robert L. Rosner
/s/ NORMAN W. ALPERT
------------------------------------------- Director
Norman W. Alpert
/s/ VINCENT J. BUONANNO
------------------------------------------- Director
Vincent J. Buonanno
</TABLE>
70
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
<C> <S>
/s/ TODD N. KHOURY
------------------------------------------- Director
Todd N. Khoury
/s/ LEONARD LIEBERMAN
------------------------------------------- Director
Leonard Lieberman
/s/ KEVIN MUNDT
------------------------------------------- Director
Kevin Mundt
/s/ ARTHUR J. NAGLE
------------------------------------------- Director
Arthur J. Nagle
/s/ VINCENT J. NAIMOLI
------------------------------------------- Director
Vincent J. Naimoli
/s/ DANIEL S. O'CONNELL
------------------------------------------- Director
Daniel S. O'Connell
/s/ JOHN W. PRIESING
------------------------------------------- Director
John W. Priesing
</TABLE>
71
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 12
RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
Income (loss) before taxes and extraordinary items....... $(9.7) $(4.8) $ 6.9 $ 6.2 $ 2.6
Plus: Fixed charges...................................... 23.3 17.5 9.2 7.8 8.5
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Income before taxes and extraordinary items plus fixed
charges................................................ $13.6 $12.7 $16.1 $14.0 $11.1
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Fixed charges:
Interest expense......................................... $21.1 $16.0 $ 8.8 $ 7.5 $ 8.3
One third of rental expense, representing interest
portion................................................ 2.2 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.2
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
$23.3 $17.5 $ 9.2 $ 7.8 $ 8.5
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges....................... --* --* 1.8 1.8 1.3
</TABLE>
- ------------------------
* Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $9.7 in 1999 and $4.8
in 1998.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001076647
<NAME> RUSSELL-STANLEY HOLDINGS, INC.
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END> DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START> JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1999
<CASH> 704,000
<SECURITIES> 0
<RECEIVABLES> 30,595,000
<ALLOWANCES> 460,000
<INVENTORY> 24,595,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 60,085,000
<PP&E> 187,599,000
<DEPRECIATION> 93,026,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 268,003,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES> 45,607,000
<BONDS> 192,769,000
0
0
<COMMON> 23,000
<OTHER-SE> 26,615,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 268,003,000
<SALES> 287,118,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 287,118,000
<CGS> 222,556,000
<TOTAL-COSTS> 53,270,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES> (119,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION> 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 21,079,000
<INCOME-PRETAX> (9,668,000)
<INCOME-TAX> (2,223,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING> (7,445,000)
<DISCONTINUED> 0
<EXTRAORDINARY> 763,000
<CHANGES> 0
<NET-INCOME> (8,208,000)
<EPS-BASIC> 0
<EPS-DILUTED> 0
</TABLE>
