As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 10, 2000.
Registration no. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM S-3
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
GLOBESPAN, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 3674 75-2658218
(State or other jurisdiction (Primary standard industrial (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or classification code number) Identification
organization) Number)
100 Schulz Drive
Red Bank, NJ 07701
(732) 345-7500
(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of
registrant's principal executive offices)
ROBERT J. MCMULLAN
Chief Financial Officer
Globespan, Inc.
100 Schulz Drive
Red Bank, NJ 07701
(732) 345-7500
(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of
agent for service)
Copies to:
JONATHAN P. CRAMER, ESQ.
Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
(212) 841-5700
APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as
practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being offered
pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plan, please check the following
box: [ ]
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on
a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of
1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend of interest
reinvestment plans, check the following box. [X]
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box
and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]
-------------
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
-------------
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434,
please check the following box. [ ]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Title to Securities to Amount to be Proposed Maximum Proposed Maximum
be Registered Registered Offering Price Per Aggregate Offering Amount of
Share(1) Price(1) Registration Fee
------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Common Stock, $0.001 5,307,791 shares $100.38 $532,796,060.58 $140,659
par value
------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee
pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
based upon the average of the high and low prices of shares as reported
on the Nasdaq National Market on October 6, 2000.
REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES
AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE
A FURTHER AMENDMENT THAT SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON
SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SUCH
SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.
<PAGE>
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY
NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER
TO SELL SECURITIES, AND WE ARE NOT SOLICITING OFFERS TO BUY THESE SECURITIES, IN
ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER 10, 2000
GlobeSpan, Inc.
5,307,791 Shares
Common Stock
This prospectus relates to the offer and sale of up to 5,307,791 shares of
common stock of GlobeSpan, Inc. by some of our selling stockholders. These
shares have been issued by us in connection with several recent acquisitions.
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"GSPN." The last reported sale price of the common stock on the Nasdaq National
Market on October 6, 2000 was $96.00 per share.
See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 6 to read about factors you should
consider before buying the shares.
The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have
not approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if this prospectus
is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is , 2000
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
----
Where You Can Find Additional Information....................................2
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements............................3
Summary......................................................................4
Risk Factors.................................................................6
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information.................21
Selling Stockholders.........................................................26
Plan of Distribution.........................................................29
Use of Proceeds..............................................................30
Legal Matters................................................................30
Experts......................................................................30
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different from that
contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to
buy, shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of
the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this
prospectus or of any sale of the common stock. In this prospectus, references to
"GlobeSpan," "we," "our" and "us" refer to GlobeSpan, Inc.
1
<PAGE>
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act with respect to the common stock
offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the
information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to
us and our common stock offered hereby, see the registration statement and the
exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in
this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract or any other document
referred to are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance where a copy of
such contract or other document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement, reference to the copy so filed, each such statement being qualified
in all respects by such reference. You may inspect a copy of the registration
statement without charge at the Securities and Exchange Commission's principal
office in Washington, D.C. and obtain copies of all or any part thereof upon
payment of fees from the Public Reference Room of the Securities and Exchange
Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, or at the
Securities and Exchange Commission's regional offices in New York, located at 7
World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048, or in Chicago, located
at 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661. You may call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an
Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other
information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The Securities and Exchange Commission's World Wide Web
address is www.sec.gov. We also maintain a Web site at http://www.globespan.net.
The information contained on our Web site does not constitute a part of this
prospectus.
The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" into the prospectus the
information we filed with them. The information incorporated by reference is an
important part of this prospectus and the information that we file subsequently
with the SEC will automatically update this prospectus. The information
incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus. We
incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any filings we make with
the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the
initial filing of this registration statement that contains this prospectus and
prior to the time of the sale of the securities offered by this prospectus:
o our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999;
o our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000;
o our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000;
o our Current Reports on Form 8-K and Form 8-K/A dated January 26, 2000,
March 10, 2000, April 14, 2000, May 12, 2000, May 18, 2000, July 14, 2000,
July 31, 2000 and October 10, 2000; and
o the description of our Common Stock contained in our Registration Statement
on Form 8-A filed on June 16, 1999 under Section 12 of the Exchange Act,
including any amendment or report updating this description.
You may request a copy of these documents, at no cost, by writing or
telephoning us at the following address:
GlobeSpan, Inc.
100 Schulz Drive
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
(732) 345-7500
2
<PAGE>
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements, trend analyses and other information contained in this
prospectus regarding markets for our products and trends in net revenues, gross
margins and anticipated expense levels, and any statement that contains the
words "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "estimate," "expect," "intend" and other
similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to business and economic risks, including
those risks identified in the "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this prospectus
and our actual results of operations may differ significantly from those
contained in the forward-looking statements because of these risks. The
cautionary statements made in this prospectus apply to all forward-looking
statements wherever they appear in this prospectus.
3
<PAGE>
SUMMARY
GlobeSpan, Inc. is a leading worldwide developer of advanced digital
subscriber line, or DSL, integrated circuits (chip sets) which enable high-speed
data transmission over the existing network of copper telephone wires known as
the local loop. Our products, when deployed at each end of these copper
telephone wires, enable data transmission at rates over 100 times faster than
today's commonly deployed modem technologies, which transmit data at 56 kilobits
per second, or Kbps. We sell our integrated circuits as chip sets to
manufacturers of DSL equipment for incorporation into products that are sold to
telecommunications service providers and end users. We have shipped our DSL chip
sets to a broad base of leading communications equipment manufacturers,
including Ascom Hasler AG, Cisco Systems, Intel Corporation, Lucent
Technologies, LG Information & Communications, NEC Corporation, Nokia
Corporation, Paradyne Corporation and Westell Technologies.
Our products target the rapidly growing market for high-speed transmission
applications such as Internet access, telecommuting and networking among branch
offices. These transmission applications are expanding to include data, voice
and video transmissions over the same copper wire. In order to enable these
applications, equipment manufacturers are designing DSL systems around
increasingly complex integrated circuits which account for a significant portion
of the value-added, proprietary content of such systems. While equipment
manufacturers have in-depth systems knowledge, they often lack the core
technologies and expertise necessary to develop these integrated circuits
internally and are turning to DSL integrated circuit developers that possess the
core technologies and expertise required to bring high performance,
cost-effective solutions to market.
Our objective is to maximize the number of products that are designed by
new and existing customers to incorporate our chip sets. By maximizing the
number of these "design wins," we create an opportunity to sell our chip sets in
volume quantities, capitalize on the success of any one of our customers' DSL
products and increase the likelihood of additional design wins with our
customers. While achieving such a design win is not a binding commitment to
purchase our product and does not guarantee an order for large volumes of our
products, it is a decision by a customer to use our products in the design
process of that customer's products. We are successful in capturing design wins
because:
o We have extensive DSL development experience, including seven years of
field experience in implementing DSL technology;
o We offer a broad suite of DSL chip sets;
o Our DSL chip sets provide high performance processing power, enabling
billions of operations per second;
o Our DSL chip sets create software flexibility, enabling our customers to
enhance or reconfigure their products through multiple software downloads;
o Our DSL chip sets offer a competitive total system cost;
o We apply advanced systems-level expertise;
o We sell comprehensive reference design guides and offer strong technical
support to accelerate customers' time to market; and
o Our DSL chip sets are designed to comply with industry standards.
4
<PAGE>
We believe these advantages and design attributes position us as the
preferred design partner and chip set supplier for DSL equipment manufacturers.
Our strategy is to maintain and grow our leading design win position by:
o Targeting all applications in the DSL market and providing the chip set
technologies necessary to enable these applications;
o Strengthening and broadening our technology competencies to maintain our
leading position in the DSL market;
o Using our advanced systems-level expertise to develop and offer chip sets
that can be cost effectively incorporated into complete DSL systems; and
o Continuing to actively participate in the formulation of critical standards
for the high-speed data transmission market.
We were formed as an independent company in July 1996 as part of the
divestiture by Lucent Technologies of AT&T Paradyne Corporation. Prior to the
divestiture, our business was operated as the Advanced Transmission Technology
Division of AT&T Paradyne Corporation.
Our principal executive officers are located at 100 Schulz Drive, Red Bank,
New Jersey 07701, and our telephone number is (732) 345-7500. Our corporate
website is www.globespan.net. The information on our website does not constitute
part of this prospectus.
5
<PAGE>
RISK FACTORS
Before you invest in our common stock, you should be aware of various
risks, including those described below. The risks described below are intended
to highlight risks that are specific to us, but are not the only risks that we
face. Additional risks and uncertainties, including those generally affecting
the industry in which we operate or risks that we currently deem immaterial may
also impair our business or the value of your investment. You should carefully
consider these risk factors, together with all of the other information included
in this prospectus, before you decide whether to purchase shares of our common
stock.
We Have Only Been Operating as an Independent Company Since August 1996, and
This Limited Operating History Makes it Difficult to Evaluate Our Prospects
We have only been operating as an independent company since August 1996,
and we only began shipping chip sets in volume in January 1997. We have not had
a long history of generating significant net revenues. As a result of our
limited operating history, we have limited historical financial data that can be
used in evaluating our business and its prospects and in projecting future
operating results. You must consider our prospects in light of the risks,
expenses and difficulties we might encounter because we are at an early stage of
development in a new and rapidly evolving market.
Our Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate Because of Many Factors, Which
Would Cause Our Stock Price to Fluctuate
Our net revenues and operating results have varied in the past and may vary
in the future from quarter-to-quarter. As a result, we believe that
period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily
meaningful. Investors should not rely on the results of any one quarter or
series of quarters as an indication of our future performance.
It is likely that in some future quarter or quarters our operating results
will be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. Due to
our recent acquisitions accounted for as purchases, we will incur substantial
non-cash compensation and amortization expenses associated with those and,
potentially, future transactions. In such event, the market price of our common
stock may decline significantly.
These variations in our operating results may be caused by factors related
to the operation of our business, including:
o variations in the timing and size of chip set orders from, and shipments
to, our existing and new customers;
o loss of a significant customer, or a significant decrease in purchases by
significant customers, such as Cisco Systems or Lucent Technologies;
o the mix of chip sets shipped with different gross margins, including the
impact of volume purchases from our large customers at discounted average
selling prices;
o the availability of foundry capacity and the expense of having our chip
sets manufactured by Lucent Microelectronics, a division of Lucent
Technologies, or other foundries in the future;
6
<PAGE>
o the timing and size of expenses, including operating expenses and expenses
of developing new products and product enhancements; and
o our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
These variations will also be caused by factors related to the development
of the DSL market and the competition we face from other DSL chip set suppliers,
including:
o the timing and rate of deployment of DSL services by telecommunications
service providers;
o the timing and rate of deployment of alternative high-speed data
transmission technologies, such as cable modems and high-speed wireless
data transmission;
o anticipated decreases in per unit prices as competition among DSL chip set
suppliers increases; and
o the level of market penetration of our chips sets relative to those of our
competitors.
These variations will also be caused by other factors affecting our
business, many of which are substantially outside of the control of our
management, including:
o costs associated with future litigation, including litigation relating to
the use or ownership of intellectual property;
o acquisition costs or other non-recurring charges in connection with the
acquisition of companies, products or technologies;
o foreign currency and exchange rate fluctuations which may make our
dollar-denominated products more expensive in foreign markets or could
expose us to currency rate fluctuation risks if our sales become
denominated in foreign currencies; and
o general global economic conditions, which could adversely affect sales to
our customers.
We Expect that Price Competition Among DSL Chip Set Suppliers and Volume
Purchases by Large Customers Will Reduce Our Gross Margins in the Future
We expect that price competition among DSL chip set suppliers and volume
purchases of our chip sets at discounted prices will reduce our gross margins in
the future. We anticipate that average per unit selling prices of DSL chip sets
will continue to decline as product technologies mature. Since we do not
manufacture our own products, we may be unable to reduce our manufactured costs
in response to declining average per unit selling prices. Many of our
competitors are larger with greater resources and therefore may be able to
achieve greater economies of scale and would be less vulnerable to price
competition.
Further, we expect that average per unit selling prices of our chip sets
will decrease in the future due to volume discounts to our large customers.
These declines in average per unit selling prices will generally lead to
declines in gross margins for these products.
7
<PAGE>
We Have a History of Losses, and We Will Incur Substantial Losses in the Future
We incurred net losses attributable to common stockholders of $88.7 million
and $111.6 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2000,
respectively, $9.0 million and $7.8 million in the years December 31, 1999 and
1998, respectively, and earned net income of $0.8 million in the year December
31, 1997. We will incur substantial net losses for the foreseeable future.
Because of substantial operating expenses, we will need to generate significant
quarterly revenues to achieve profitability. Our failure to significantly
increase our net revenues would result in continuing losses. Even if we do
achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability
or cash flow on a quarterly or annual basis.
The Loss of One or More of Our Key Customers Would Result in a Loss of a
Significant Amount of Our Net Revenues
A relatively small number of customers account for a large percentage of
our net revenues. Our business will be seriously harmed if we do not generate as
much revenue as we expect from these customers, or experience a loss of any of
our significant customers, particularly Cisco Systems and Lucent Technologies,
or suffer a substantial reduction in orders from such customers. In the six
months ended June 30, 2000 and the three years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and
1997, our customers who individually represented at least five percent of our
net revenues accounted for 72.9%, 60.6%, 70.1% and 72.6%, respectively, of our
net revenues. In the six months ended June 30, 2000, our top two customers were
Cisco Systems and Lucent Technologies, which accounted for 27.7% and 18.9% of
our net revenues, respectively. In 1999, our top three customers were Cisco
Systems, Lucent Technologies and Ascom Hasler AG, which accounted for 41.6%,
7.1% and 6.2% of our net revenues, respectively. In 1998, our top three
customers were Cisco Systems, NEC Corporation and Ascom Hasler AG, which
accounted for 48.3%, 12.6% and 9.2% of our net revenues, respectively. In 1997,
our top three customers were LG Information & Communications, Ascom Hasler AG
and Westell Technologies, which accounted for 21.4%, 12.5% and 9.6% of our net
revenues, respectively. We do not have purchase contracts with any of our
customers that obligate them to continue to purchase our products and these
customers could cease purchasing our products at any time. Furthermore, it is
possible that DSL equipment manufacturers, such as Cisco Systems, Lucent
Technologies and Ascom Hasler AG, may design and develop internally, or acquire,
their own chip set technology, rather than continue to purchase chip sets from
third parties such as us. We expect that sales of our products to relatively few
customers will continue to account for a significant portion of our net revenues
for the foreseeable future.
Because of Our Long Product Development Process and Sales Cycle, We May Incur
Substantial Expenses Before We Earn Associated Net Revenues and May Not
Ultimately Sell a Large Volume of Our Products
We develop products based on forecasts of demand and incur substantial
product development expenditures prior to generating associated net revenues. We
sell our products based on individual purchase orders. Our customers are not
obligated by long-term contracts to purchase our chip sets. In addition, we do
not receive orders for our chip sets during the period that potential customers
test and evaluate our chip sets. This test and evaluation period typically lasts
from three to six months or longer, and volume production of the DSL equipment
manufacturer's product that incorporates our chip sets typically does not begin
until this test and evaluation period has been completed. In addition, we do not
have a substantial non-cancelable backlog of orders and our customers can
generally cancel or reschedule orders upon short notice. As a result, a
significant period of time may lapse between our product development and sales
efforts and our realization of revenues from volume ordering of our products by
our customers, or we may never realize revenues from our efforts. Furthermore,
achieving a design win with a customer does not necessarily mean that this
customer will order large volumes of our products. A
8
<PAGE>
design win is not a binding commitment by a customer to purchase our products.
Rather, it is a decision by a customer to use our products in the design process
of that customer's products. A customer can choose at any time to discontinue
using our products in that customer's designs or product development efforts. If
our products are chosen to be incorporated into a customer's products, we may
still not realize significant net revenues from that customer if that customer's
products are not commercially successful.
Our Acquisitions May Be Difficult to Integrate, Disrupt Our Business, Dilute
Stockholder Value or Divert Management Attention
We may seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products,
technologies or engineers. Our acquisition strategy does not require that our
acquisitions immediately increase our net revenues; rather, our objective is to
seek acquisitions that we believe could complement or expand our business,
augment our market coverage, enhance our technical capabilities or that may
otherwise offer growth opportunities. During the six month period ended June 30,
2000, we acquired Ficon Technology, Inc., the technology and the right to hire
employees of the Microelectronics Group of PairGain Technologies, Inc.,
T.sqware, Inc. and iCompression, Inc. We plan to pursue further acquisition
opportunities in the future.
Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky,
and no assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions will be
successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating
results or financial condition. Our past and future acquisitions may involve
many risks, including:
o difficulties in managing our growth following acquisitions;
o difficulties in the integration of the acquired personnel, operations,
technologies, products and systems of the acquired companies;
o uncertainties concerning the intellectual property rights we purport to
acquire;
o unanticipated costs associated with the acquisitions;
o diversion of management's attention from other business concerns;
o adverse effects on our existing business relationships with our or our
acquired companies' customers;
o potential difficulties in completing projects associated with purchased in
process research and development;
o risks of entering markets in which we have no or limited direct prior
experience and where competitors in such markets have stronger market
positions; and
o inability to retain employees of acquired companies.
Additionally, future acquisitions may require us to use substantial
portions of our available cash as all or a portion of the purchase price.
Acquisitions may also materially and adversely affect our results of operations
because they may require large one-time write-offs, increased debt or contingent
liabilities, substantial depreciation or deferred compensation charges or the
amortization of expenses related to tangible and intangible assets. For example,
in the first half of 2000, we incurred a one-time charge of $44.9 million
related to in process research and development in connection with prior
acquisitions and began to amortize charges from tangible and intangible assets
acquired.
9
<PAGE>
Furthermore, if we issue equity or convertible debt securities in
connection with an acquisition, as in the case of our recent acquisitions, the
issuance may be dilutive to our existing shareholders. The equity or debt
securities that we may issue could have rights, preference or privileges senior
to those of holders of our common stock.
Any of the events described in the foregoing paragraphs could cause the
price of our common stock to decline.
We are currently engaged in various stages of discussions with several
parties with respect to acquisitions.
If Leading DSL Equipment Manufacturers Do Not Incorporate Our Chip Sets in
Successful Products, Sales of Our Products Will Significantly Decline
We rely upon DSL equipment manufacturers, such as Cisco Systems and Lucent
Technologies, to design our chip sets into their DSL products. We rely on these
products to be successful, and if they are not, we will not sell our chip sets
in volume quantities. Accordingly, we must correctly anticipate the price,
performance and functionality requirements of these DSL equipment manufacturers.
We must also successfully develop products that meet these requirements and make
such products available on a timely basis and in sufficient quantities. Further,
if there is consolidation in the DSL equipment manufacturing industry, or if a
small number of DSL equipment manufacturers otherwise dominate the market for
DSL equipment, then our success will depend upon our ability to establish and
maintain relationships with these market leaders. If we do not anticipate trends
in the DSL market and meet the requirements of DSL equipment manufacturers, or
if we do not successfully establish and maintain relationships with leading DSL
equipment manufacturers, then our business, financial condition and results of
operations will be seriously harmed.
If Our Customers Experience Component Supply Shortages, Our Net Revenues and
Operating Results May Decline
The semiconductor industry from time to time is affected by limited
supplies of certain key components and materials. We rely on our customers, DSL
equipment manufacturers, to produce reliable, successful DSL systems by
incorporating our chip sets and additional components into their products. In
the past there have been industry wide shortages of electronic components, such
as capacitors. In some cases, supply shortages of particular components or
materials will substantially curtail production of products using these
components. We cannot guarantee that we would not lose potential sales from our
customers if key components or materials are unavailable to them, and as a
result, we are unable to maintain or increase our production levels.
Rapid Changes in the Market for DSL Chip Sets May Render Our Chip Sets Obsolete
or Unmarketable
The market for chip sets for DSL products is characterized by:
o intense competition;
o rapid technological change;
o frequent new product introductions by our competitors;
o changes in customer demands; and
10
<PAGE>
o evolving industry standards.
Any of these factors could make our existing or proposed products obsolete
or unmarketable. If we fail to successfully introduce new products on a timely
and cost-effective basis that meet customer requirements and are compatible with
evolving industry standards, then our business, financial condition and results
of operations will be seriously harmed.
We Depend on a Limited Number of Suppliers to Manufacture Our Chip Sets, and Any
Disruption in Any of These Relationships Could Prevent Us from Selling Our
Products
We do not own or operate a semiconductor fabrication facility.
Historically, Lucent Microelectronics has manufactured substantially all of our
chip sets. We depend on Lucent Microelectronics to timely deliver to us
sufficient quantities of fully-assembled and tested chip sets on a turnkey
basis. We have had a series of manufacturing arrangements with Lucent
Microelectronics, the latest of which became effective in March 1999. This
agreement, however, does not guarantee that Lucent Microelectronics will
adequately fill our orders for current chip sets (either in quantity or timing),
or that we will be able to negotiate mutually satisfactory terms for
manufacturing our future chip sets. Any disruption in availability of our
products would have a serious adverse impact on our business.
We have been engaged in the process of negotiating and/or exploring
prospective supply agreements with other leading chip suppliers. We entered into
an agreement with United Microelectronics Corporation, or UMC, to supply some of
our chip sets. Our agreement with UMC became effective in December 1999 and
provides us with the ability to obtain delivery of specific chip sets in
accordance with the terms of that agreement, upon our providing binding
forecasts to UMC. Although this agreement provides for a term of five years,
with subsequent one-year renewals, UMC may cancel the agreement upon 12 months'
advance notice to us. While, in such an event, UMC would still be required to
fill our orders for commercially reasonable quantities of product during the
12-month notice period, the termination of this agreement by UMC could cause a
disruption to our business. In addition, we recently finalized an agreement with
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., or TSMC, which also provides for a
five-year term, is terminable by the supplier upon 12 months' advance notice to
us, and requires TSMC to fill our orders for commercially reasonable quantities
of product during the 12-month notice period. We have recently begun using
ZiLOG, Inc., an affiliate of Texas Pacific Group, our controlling shareholder,
to manufacture chip sets for us on a purchase order basis. We do not have a
supply agreement with ZiLOG. We will continue to seek agreements with other chip
manufacturers. None of these other prospective agreements, however, would
provide us with a guarantee that our orders for chip sets will be adequately
filled.
If we are required for any reason to seek a new manufacturer of our chip
sets, a new manufacturer of our chip sets may not be available and in any event,
switching to a new manufacturer would require six months or more and would
involve significant expense and disruption to our business. From time to time
there are shortages in worldwide foundry capacity. Such shortages, if they
occur, could make it more difficult for us to find a new manufacturer of our
chip sets if our relationship with any of our suppliers is terminated for any
reason.
If We Are Required to Seek New Manufacturers of Our Integrated Circuits, We Will
Be Required to Modify Our Products Which Will Be Costly
Our integrated circuits are manufactured by independent providers of
semiconductor manufacturing services, known as foundries. These foundries
manufacture our integrated circuits using their individual manufacturing process
technology. In addition, the foundry may license to us standard circuit modules,
known as intellectual property cores, or IP cores. Our DSL chip designs are
customized
11
<PAGE>
by the foundry for their specific manufacturing processes and IP cores. In order
to second source or switch foundry providers, our chip sets would need to be
re-designed for the process technology and IP cores of the respective foundry.
The re-design of the integrated circuits is costly and time consuming and the
requalification of the manufacturing process can take up to six months.
Establishing additional sources for manufacturing our products would be
expensive and disruptive to our business.
We May Be Required to Obtain Licenses on Adverse Terms to Sell Industry Standard
Compliant Chip Sets
We have received correspondence, including a proposed licensing agreement,
from Amati Corporation (which was acquired by Texas Instruments) stating that
they believe that they own a number of patents that are required to be compliant
with the American National Standards Institute, or ANSI, standard specification
T1.413. This industry standard is based on the DMT line code. We have introduced
products that we believe are compliant with this industry standard, and we may
be required to obtain a license to these Amati patents. We are currently
evaluating Amati's patents and proposed licensing terms. If these patents are
valid and essential to the implementation of products that are compliant with
this industry standard, then Amati may be required to offer us a license to use
these patents on commercially reasonable, non-discriminatory terms. If these
patents are valid, but not essential to the implementation of products that are
compliant with this industry standard, and they apply to our products and we do
not modify our products so they become non-infringing, then Amati would not be
obligated to offer us a license on reasonable terms or at all. If we are not
able to agree on license terms and as a result fail to obtain a required
license, then we could be sued and potentially be liable for substantial
monetary damages or have the sale of our products stopped by an injunction. We
could also be subject to similar claims like the Amati claim by third parties in
the future.
Third-Party Claims Regarding Intellectual Property Matters Could Cause Us or Our
Customers to Stop Selling Products or Pay Monetary Damages
There is a significant risk that third parties, including current and
potential competitors, will claim that our products, or our customers' products,
infringe on their intellectual property rights. The owners of such intellectual
property rights may bring infringement claims against us. Any such litigation,
whether or not determined in our favor or settled by us, would be costly and
divert the attention of our management and technical personnel.
Any inquiries with respect to coverage of our intellectual property could
develop into litigation. In the event of an adverse ruling for an intellectual
property infringement claim, we could be required to obtain a license or pay
substantial damages or have the sale of our products stopped by an injunction.
In addition, if a customer of our chip sets cannot acquire a required license on
commercially reasonable terms, that customer may choose not to use our chip
sets. From time to time our customers or we receive letters from third parties
claiming that our or our customers' products infringe those third parties'
intellectual property rights.
We have obligations to indemnify our customers under some circumstances for
infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. From time to time we
receive letters from customers inquiring as to the scope of these indemnity
rights. For example, on April 25, 2000 we received a letter from counsel to
Cisco Systems informing us that Alcatel Alsthom S.A. had recently asserted that
certain products made and sold by Cisco Systems, which incorporate digital
signal processors made by us, infringed patents held by Alcatel. We evaluate all
letters of this nature to determine whether we have an indemnity obligation and
take appropriate steps. If any claims from third-parties required us to
indemnify customers under our agreements, the costs could be substantial and our
business could be harmed.
12
<PAGE>
Despite Our Efforts to Protect Our Intellectual Property, Third Parties May Gain
Access to Our Proprietary Technology and Use It to Compete with Us
We rely primarily on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks,
trade secret laws, contractual provisions, licenses and mask work protection
under the Federal Semiconductor Chip Protection Act of 1984 to protect our
intellectual property. In particular, we rely on these measures to protect our
intellectual property because, as a fabless semiconductor company, we have third
parties, including competitors such as Lucent Microelectronics, manufacture our
chip sets. Employees, consultants and customers have access to our proprietary
and confidential information. Any misuse or misappropriation of this
intellectual property could have an adverse impact on our business. We take
steps to control access to, and the distribution of, our proprietary
information. We cannot guarantee, however, that such safeguards will protect our
intellectual property and other valuable competitive information.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties
may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that
we regard as proprietary. For example, in June 1998, we filed suit against three
former employees who had recently commenced employment with one of our
competitors. The court issued a final judgment in our favor and against the
defendants. In addition, the court ordered injunctive and other relief against
the defendants. The defendants appealed the judgment and their appeal was
dismissed as moot in June 2000.
In connection with our private placement of Series A preferred stock, which
was subsequently converted into common stock, we agreed not to sue Intel
Corporation for any violation by it of our patent rights. This agreement
terminates if Intel Corporation sues us for any infringement by us of its patent
rights or Intel's ownership in us is less than 1% of our outstanding capital
stock. This agreement not to sue could enable Intel Corporation to compete more
effectively against us.
Our Efforts to Protect Our Intellectual Property May Be Less Effective in Some
Foreign Countries Where Intellectual Property Rights Are Not Well Protected by
Law or Enforcement
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to
the same extent as do the laws of the United States, and many U.S. companies
have encountered substantial infringement problems in these countries, some of
which are countries in which we have sold and continue to sell products. There
is a risk that our efforts to protect our proprietary rights may not be
adequate. For example, our competitors may independently develop similar
technology, duplicate our products or design around our patents or our other
intellectual property rights. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual
property or if the laws of a foreign jurisdiction do not effectively permit such
protection, it would be easier for our competitors to sell competing products.
Our Industry Is Highly Competitive, and We Cannot Assure You that We Will Be
Able to Effectively Compete
The DSL chip set market is intensely competitive. We expect competition to
intensify further as current competitors expand their product offerings and new
competitors enter the market. We believe that we must compete on the basis of a
variety of factors, including:
o time to market;
o functionality;
o conformity to industry standards;
13
<PAGE>
o performance;
o price;
o breadth of product lines;
o product migration plans; and
o technical support.
We believe our principal competitors include Alcatel; Analog Devices;
Centillium Technology Corporation; Conexant Systems; Infineon Technologies;
Intel Corporation; Lucent Technologies; MetaLink; Motorola; and Texas
Instruments. In addition to these competitors, there have been growing numbers
of announcements by other integrated circuit companies that they intend to enter
the DSL chip set market.
Many of our competitors have greater name recognition, their own
manufacturing capabilities, significantly greater financial and technical
resources, and the sales, marketing and distribution strengths that are normally
associated with large multinational companies. These competitors may also have
pre-existing relationships with our customers or potential customers. These
competitors may compete effectively with us because of the above-listed factors
and because they more quickly introduce new technologies, more rapidly or
effectively address customer requirements or devote greater resources to the
promotion and sale of their products than we do. Further, in the event of a
manufacturing capacity shortage, these competitors may be able to manufacture
products when we are unable to do so.
Other Technologies for the High-Speed Data Transmission Market Will Compete
Effectively with DSL Services
DSL services are competing with a variety of different high-speed data
transmission technologies, including cable modems, satellite and other wireless
technologies. Many of these technologies will compete effectively with DSL
services. All of our chip sets are deployed in networks that use standard copper
telephone wires. Copper telephone wires have physical properties that limit the
speed and distance over which data can be transmitted. In general, data
transmission rates over copper telephone wires are slower over longer distances
and faster over shorter distances. If any technology that is competing with DSL
technology is more reliable, faster, less expensive, reaches more customers or
has other advantages over DSL technology, then the demand for our chip sets and
our revenues and gross margins may decrease.
Changes in Current or Future Laws or Regulations or the Imposition of New Laws
or Regulations by the FCC, Other Federal or State Agencies or Foreign
Governments Could Impede the Sale of Our Products or Otherwise Harm Our Business
The Federal Communications Commission has broad jurisdiction over our
target market. Although current FCC regulations and the laws and regulations of
other federal or state agencies are not directly applicable to our products,
they do apply to much of the equipment into which our products are incorporated.
As a result, the effects of regulation on our customers or the industries in
which they operate may, in turn, materially and adversely impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations. FCC regulatory policies that
affect the ability of cable operators or telephone companies to offer certain
services or other aspects of their business may impede the sale of our products.
We may also be subject to regulation by countries other than the United States.
Foreign governments may impose tariffs, duties and other import restrictions on
components that we obtain from non-domestic supplies and
14
<PAGE>
may impose export restrictions on products that we sell internationally. These
tariffs, duties or restrictions could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Changes in current laws
or regulations or the imposition of new laws and regulations in the United
States or elsewhere could also materially and adversely affect our business.
Our Future Success Depends in Part on the Continued Service of Our Key Design,
Engineering, Sales, Marketing and Executive Personnel and Our Ability to
Identify, Hire and Retain Additional Personnel
We depend upon the continuing contributions of our key management, sales,
customer support and product development personnel. The loss of such personnel
could seriously harm us. Armando Geday, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, is our only executive officer subject to an employment agreement;
however, we cannot be sure that we can retain Mr. Geday's services. In addition,
we have not obtained key-man life insurance on any of our executive officers or
key employees. Because DSL technology is specialized and complex, we need to
recruit and train qualified technical personnel. However, there are many
employers competing to hire qualified technical personnel and we have had
difficulty attracting and retaining such personnel. We expect to continue to
have difficulty hiring and retaining qualified personnel. Further, our
competitors have recruited our employees and may do so in the future. Loss of
the services of, or failure to recruit, key design engineers or other technical
and management personnel could be significantly detrimental to our product
development programs.
Substantial Sales of Our Chip Sets Will Not Occur Unless Telecommunications
Service Providers Initiate Substantial Deployment of DSL Services
The success of our products is dependent upon the decision by
telecommunications service providers to deploy DSL technologies and the timing
of the deployment. Factors that will impact such deployment include:
o a prolonged approval process, including laboratory tests, technical trials,
marketing trials, initial commercial deployment and full commercial
deployment;
o the development of a viable business model for DSL services, including the
capability to market, sell, install and maintain DSL services;
o cost constraints, such as installation costs and space and power
requirements at the telecommunications service provider's central office;
o varying and uncertain conditions of the local loop, including the size and
length of the copper wire, electrical interference and interference with
existing voice and data telecommunications services;
o challenges of interoperability among DSL equipment manufacturers' products;
o evolving industry standards for DSL technologies; and
o government regulation.
Although a number of telecommunications service providers have commenced
commercial deployment of DSL services using DSL products that incorporate our
chip sets, if these telecommunications service providers do not expand their
deployment of DSL services, or if additional
15
<PAGE>
telecommunications service providers do not offer DSL services on a timely
basis, then our business, financial condition and results of operations will be
seriously harmed.
The Recent Rapid Expansion of Our Operations Has Placed a Strain on Our
Management and Personnel and Other Resources
From December 31, 1997 to June 30, 2000, we increased from 93 to 571 total
employees. This growth and rapid expansion in our operations has placed and will
continue to place a significant strain upon our management, operating and
financial systems and other resources. To accommodate this expansion of
operations, we must continue to implement and improve information systems,
procedures and controls and expand, train, motivate and manage our work force.
If we do not successfully manage our growth, our business, financial condition
and results of operations will be seriously harmed.
Sales to Customers Based Outside of the United States Have Accounted for a
Significant Portion of Our Net Revenues, Which Exposes Us to Inherent Risks of
International Business
We expect that sales to such international customers will continue to
account for a significant portion of our net revenues for the foreseeable
future. Accordingly, we are subject to risks inherent in our international
business activities, including:
o unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
o tariffs and other trade barriers, including current and future import and
export restrictions;
o difficulties in collecting accounts receivables;
o difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
o potentially adverse tax consequences, including restrictions on the
repatriation of earnings;
o the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws (particularly
with respect to intellectual property) and license requirements;
o the risks related to international political instability and to the recent
global economic turbulence and adverse economic circumstances in Asia;
o difficulties in protecting intellectual property rights in some foreign
countries; and
o limited ability to enforce agreements and other rights in some foreign
countries.
We are subject to the risks associated with the imposition of legislation
and regulations relating to the import or export of high technology products. We
cannot predict whether quotas, duties, taxes or other changes or restrictions
upon the importation or exportation of our products will be implemented by the
United States or other countries. Because sales of our products have been
denominated to date primarily in United States dollars, increases in the value
of the United States dollar could increase the price of our products so that
they become relatively more expensive to customers in the local currency of a
particular country, leading to a reduction in sales and profitability in that
country. Future international activity may result in increased foreign currency
denominated sales. Gains and losses on the conversion to United States dollars
of accounts receivable, accounts payable and other monetary assets and
liabilities arising
16
<PAGE>
from international operations may contribute to fluctuations in our results of
operations. Some of our customer purchase orders and agreements are governed by
foreign laws, which may differ significantly from United States laws. Therefore,
we may be limited in our ability to enforce our rights under such agreements and
to collect damages, if awarded.
If We Deliver Products with Defects, Our Reputation Will Be Harmed, and the
Sales and Market Acceptance of Our Products Will Decrease
Our products are complex and have contained errors, defects and bugs when
introduced or as new versions are released. If we deliver products with errors,
defects or bugs or that have reliability, quality or compatibility problems, our
reputation and the market acceptance and sales of our products could be harmed,
which could adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers or attract
new customers. Further, if our products contain errors, defects and bugs, then
we may be required to expend significant capital and resources to alleviate
these problems. Further, these defects or problems could interrupt or delay
sales to our customers. If any of these problems are not found until we have
commenced commercial production, we may be required to incur additional
development costs and product repair or replacement costs. Defects could also
lead to liability as a result of product liability lawsuits against us or
against our customers. We have agreed to indemnify our customers in some
circumstances against liability from defects in our products. A successful
product liability claim could seriously harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations. In addition, these problems may divert our technical
and other resources from other development efforts.
We Will Continue to Be Controlled by a Principal Stockholder, Which May Have the
Effect of Preventing or Delaying a Change of Control of Our Company, and the
Interests of the Principal Stockholder May Not Always Coincide with Those of Our
Stockholders
As of September 25, 2000, our executive officers and directors and their
affiliates own, in the aggregate, approximately 26.7% of our outstanding common
stock. Entities affiliated with Texas Pacific Group own approximately 21.5% of
GlobeSpan as of September 25, 2000 and are able to exercise control over us
subject to the fiduciary duties of its representatives on the board of directors
under Delaware law. The interests of Texas Pacific Group may not always coincide
with our interests or the interests of other stockholders. Texas Pacific Group,
through its representatives on our board of directors, could cause us to enter
into transactions or agreements, which we would not otherwise consider absent
Texas Pacific Group's influence.
Our current board of directors consists of Ms. Connor and Messrs. Coulter,
Deb, Epley, Faggin, Geday, Geeslin, Marren and Stanton. Our board of directors
has also created an Executive Committee consisting of Messrs. Coulter, Epley and
Geday. Of the current members of the board of directors and the Executive
Committee, Messrs. Epley, Geeslin and Stanton are also currently directors of,
and have direct or indirect equity interests in, Paradyne Corporation, which is
a customer of ours. Accordingly, our continuing supplier relationship with
Paradyne Corporation, and any other potential business dealings between Paradyne
Corporation and us, could create conflicts of interest for the GlobeSpan
directors.
We have waived in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation the
application to us of section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law is a statute that generally
prohibits an "interested stockholder" from engaging in a "business combination"
with a corporation for three years following the time this person became an
interested stockholder. An "interested stockholder" is defined generally as a
person owning 15% or more of a corporation's voting stock or an affiliate or
associate of that person. A "business combination" is defined to include a
variety of transactions, including mergers and sales of 10% or more of a
corporation's assets. A business combination with an interested stockholder is
allowed, however, if the business combination
17
<PAGE>
is approved by at least 66 2/3% of the shares held by the corporation's
disinterested stockholders. By waiving Section 203, it will be easier for us to
enter into transactions with our significant stockholders, including Texas
Pacific Group, without giving our disinterested stockholders the opportunity to
approve the transaction.
We Have Antitakeover Defenses that Could Delay or Prevent an Acquisition of Our
Company
Some of the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and
the provisions of Delaware law could have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing our acquisition. For example, we have authorized but unissued shares
of preferred stock which could be used to fend off a takeover attempt, our
stockholders may not take actions by written consent, our stockholders are
limited in their ability to make proposals at stockholder meetings and our
directors may be removed only for cause and upon the affirmative vote of at
least 80% of our outstanding voting shares.
We May Need to Raise Additional Capital Which Might Not Be Available or Which,
if Available, Would Be on Terms Adverse to Our Stockholders
We expect the net proceeds from our recent offerings and our current cash
and cash equivalents will meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs
for at least one year. After that, we may need to raise additional funds, and we
cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on
favorable terms, if at all. We may also require additional capital for the
acquisition of businesses, products and technologies that are complementary to
ours. Further, if we issue equity securities, the ownership percentage of our
stockholders would be reduced, and the new equity securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common
stock. If we cannot raise needed funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able
to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or
respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could
seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Our Stock Price Has Been and May Continue to Be Volatile, Which Might Make It
Difficult for Our Stockholders to Sell Their Shares
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly in
response to some of the following factors and will likely continue to fluctuate
significantly in response to the following factors, some of which are beyond our
control:
o variations in our quarterly operating results;
o changes in financial estimates of our net revenues and operating results by
securities analysts;
o changes in market valuations of integrated circuit companies;
o announcements by us of significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic
partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
o loss or decrease in sales to a major customer or failure to complete
significant transactions;
o loss or reduction in manufacturing capacity from Lucent Microelectronics or
our other suppliers;
18
<PAGE>
o additions or departures of key personnel;
o future sales of our common stock;
o stock market price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent
trading volume levels of our stock;
o commencement of or involvement in litigation; and
o announcements by us or our competitors of key design wins and product
introductions.
We Could Be Subject to Class Action Litigation Due to Stock Price Volatility,
Which, if It Occurs, Will Distract Management and Result in Substantial Costs,
and Could Result in Judgments Against Us
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought
against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their
securities. We may be the target of similar litigation in the future. Securities
litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management's attention
and resources, which could cause serious harm to our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Exercise of Options and Subsequent Sale of Common Stock
As of September 25, 2000, there were outstanding options to purchase
15,753,900 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 450,000 shares of
our common stock. All shares of common stock underlying our option plans are
registered and, upon exercise, are freely tradeable subject to volume trading
limitations under Rule 144. These options entitle the holders to purchase shares
of common stock at prices per share that may be less than the current market
price per share of our common stock. The holders of these options will usually
exercise them at a time when the market price of our common stock is greater
than the exercise price of the options. The exercise of options and subsequent
sale of common stock could reduce the market price for our common stock and
result in dilution to our then stockholders.
Existing Stockholders May Sell Their Common Stock Which May Reduce Our Stock
Price
The market price of our common stock could drop as a result of sales of a
large number of shares of common stock in the market after this offering, or the
price could remain lower because of the belief that such sales could occur.
These factors also could make it more difficult for us to raise funds through
future offerings of common stock.
As of September 25, 2000, we have 71,603,630 shares of common stock
outstanding. All of these shares are freely tradeable without restriction, with
the following exceptions:
o 18,370,203 shares which are owned by certain of our officers, directors,
and affiliates and may be resold publicly at any time subject to the volume
and other restrictions under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, and
o 5,307,791 shares which were issued in our acquisitions may be sold under
Rule 144 beginning on January 28, 2001 (all of which are covered by this
prospectus and may be freely sold prior to that time).
In connection with the follow-on offering completed in August 2000, our
executive officers and directors and some of our other stockholders agreed not
to sell or otherwise dispose of their shares of
19
<PAGE>
common stock. Most of the shares that will be available for sale after November
1, 2000 or afterwards will be subject to volume limitations because they are
held by our affiliates.
We Do Not Anticipate Paying Any Dividends
We currently intend to retain all future earnings to fund the development
and growth of our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying any
dividends.
20
<PAGE>
GLOBESPAN, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations (the "Pro Forma Statement of Operations") for the year ended December
31, 1999 and the six months ended June 30, 2000 gives effect to the Ficon
Technology, Inc. (Ficon), T.sqware, Inc. (T.sqware), and iCompression, Inc.
(iCompression) acquisitions as if they had occurred on January 1, 1999,
accounted for as a purchase business combination. The Pro Forma Statement of
Operations is based on historical results of operations of GlobeSpan, Inc.
(GlobeSpan), Ficon, T.sqware and iCompression for the year ended December 31,
1999 and for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
The Ficon, T.sqware, and iCompression acquisitions consummated on January
31, 2000, April 27, 2000, and June 30, 2000, respectively, and have been
consolidated with GlobeSpan as of June 30, 2000. Included in the Pro Forma
Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2000 are the operating
results of Ficon for the month of January 2000, T.sqware for the period January
1, 2000 through April 27, 2000 and iCompression for the six months ended June
30, 2000. The Pro Forma Statement of Operations and accompanying pro forma
adjustments and assumptions (the "Pro Forma Financial Information") should be
read in conjunction with and are qualified by the historical financial
statements of GlobeSpan, Ficon, T.sqware and iCompression and the notes thereto.
The Pro Forma Financial Information is intended for informational purposes
only and is not necessarily indicative of the future financial position or
future results of operations of GlobeSpan after the acquisitions or of the
financial position or results of operations of GlobeSpan that would have
actually occurred had the acquisitions been effected on January 1, 1999. It is
GlobeSpan's current intention to incorporate the acquired companies'
technologies into its on-going product offerings.
21
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
<CAPTION>
For the year ended December 31, 1999
--------------------------------------
GlobeSpan Ficon T.Sqware iCompression Adjustments Pro Forma
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues $ 56,220 $ 4,719 $ 636 $ 333 $ - $ 61,908
Cost of sales 20,879 - - 118 - 20,997
Cost of sales related to termination charge 1,119 - - - - 1,119
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gross profit 34,222 4,719 636 215 - 39,792
Operating expenses
Research and development 26,531 4,079 6,803 5,691 674 d 43,778
Selling, general and administrative 14,389 556 5,926 2,208 126 d 33,038
9,833 e
Non-cash compensation - - 241 1,001 1,242
Amortization of intangibles - - - - 29,007 a 172,117
78,295 b
3,645 c
215 a
278 b
60,677 f
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses 40,920 4,635 12,970 8,900 182,750 250,175
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income from operations (6,698) 84 (12,334) (8,685) (182,750) (210,383)
Interest income 1,581 - 280 108 - 1,969
Interest expense (448) (4) (240) (4) - (696)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before taxes (5,565) 80 (12,294) (8,581) (182,750) (209,110)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes - 34 - 1 - 35
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income (5,565) 46 (12,294) (8,582) (182,750) (209,145)
Preferred stock deemed dividend and
accretion (3,466) - - - - (3,466)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net loss attributed to common
stockholders $ (9,031) $ 46 $ (12,294) $ (8,582) $(182,750) $(212,611)
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Loss per share basic and diluted $ (0.19) $ (4.05)
========= =========
444,160 i
Shares used in computing net loss per 2,022,290 g
share - basic and diluted 46,612,752 3,470,152 h 52,549,354
</TABLE>
22
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
<CAPTION>
For the six months ended June 30, 2000
----------------------------------------
GlobeSpan Ficon T.Sqware iCompression Adjustments Pro Forma
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues $ 106,961 $ 60 $ 550 $ 848 - $ 108,419
Cost of sales 40,833 - 12,080 103 - 53,016
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gross profit 66,128 60 (11,530) 745 - 55,403
Operating expenses
Research and development 34,092 532 3,926 6,749 - 45,299
Selling, general and administrative 17,375 68 4,362 1,422 819 e 24,046
Non-cash compensation expense 9,981 - 246 1,852 - 12,079
Amortization of intangible assets 38,319 - - - 9,669 a 97,763
39,148 b
72 a
139 b
304 c
10,112 f
In process research and development 44,854 - - - - 44,854
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total operating expenses 144,621 600 8,534 10,023 60,263 224,041
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Loss) from operations (78,493) (540) (20,064) (9,278) (60,263) (168,638)
Foreign exchange gain 4 - - - - 4
Interest income 1,625 - 407 427 - 2,459
Interest expense, other (1,700) - (380) (136) - (2,216)
Interest expense, non-cash (33,035) - - - - (33,035)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(Loss) income before taxes (111,599) (540) (20,037) (8,987) (60,263) (201,426)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes - - - - - -
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Net (loss) income $(111,599) $ (540) $ (20,037) $ (8,987) $ (60,263) $(201,426)
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Loss per share basic and diluted $ (1.84) $ (3.08)
========= =========
Shares used in computing net loss per 1,300,082 g
share - basic and diluted 60,514,616 3,470,152 h 65,432,903
148,053 i
</TABLE>
23
<PAGE>
Pro Forma Adjustments and Assumptions (in thousands, except share and per share
data)
(a) Pro forma adjustments relating to the acquisition of T.Sqware:
o The pro forma adjustments relating to the acquisition of T.sqware reflect
twelve months of amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 1999
and approximately four months of amortization for the period January 1,
2000 through April 27, 2000, assuming the transaction had occurred on
January 1, 1999. The value of the goodwill and intangible assets at January
1, 1999 was approximately $116,026. Goodwill and other intangible assets
are amortized over four years, which is the estimated period of benefit.
Such amounts approximate $29,007 for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
$9,669 for the period January 1, 2000 through April 27, 2000. In process
technology of $10,300 was written-off by GlobeSpan since it is not expexted
to reach the state of technological feasibility and has been reflected in
GlobeSpan's statement of operations for the six months ended June 30,
2000.
o In connection with the acquisition of T.sqware, GlobeSpan has acquisition
expenses of $860, reflected as an adjustment to goodwill and will be
amortized over four years, which is the estimated period of benefit, or
$215 for the year ended December 31, 1999 and $72 for the period January 1,
2000 through April 27, 2000.
(b) Pro forma adjustments relating to the acquisition of iCompression:
o The pro forma adjustments relating to the acquisition of iCompression
reflect twelve months of amortization expense for the year ended December
31, 1999 and six months of amortization expense for the six month period
ended June 30, 2000, assuming the transaction had occurred on January 1,
1999. The value of the goodwill and intangible assets at January 1, 1999
was approximately $313,180. Goodwill and other intangible assets are
amortized over four years, which is the estimated period of benefit. Such
amounts approximate $78,295 and $39,148 for the year ended December 31,
1999 and the six month period ended June 30, 2000, respectively. The
process technology of $33,211 was written-off by GlobeSpan since it is not
expected to reach the stage of technological feasibility and has been
reflected in GlobeSpan's statement of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2000.
o In connection with the acquisition of iCompression, GlobeSpan has
acquisition expenses of $1,100, reflected as an adjustment to goodwill and
will be amortized over four years, which is the estimated period of
benefit, or approximately $278 for the year ended December 31, 1999 and
$139 for the six month period ended June 30, 2000.
(c) The pro forma adjustments reflect twelve months of amortization expense for
the year ended December 31, 1999 relating to the Ficon acquisition assuming
the transaction had occurred on January 1, 1999. The value of the goodwill
and intangible assets at January 1, 1999 was approximately $10,070.
Goodwill and other intangible assets are amortized over the expected
estimated period of benefit ranging from two to four years. Such amount
approximates $3,645 per year or $304 per month. In process technology of
$1,343 was written-off by GlobeSpan since it is not expected to reach the
stage of technological feasibility and has been reflected in GlobeSpan's
statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
(d) In connection with the Ficon merger agreement, Ficon paid its employees a
bonus in amounts not to exceed $60 for any employee or $800 in the
aggregate, which has been allocated between research and development and
selling, general and administrative expenses, based on Ficon's historical
allocation of employee salaries.
(e) In connection with the acquisition of Ficon by GlobeSpan, 773,760 shares of
restricted common stock were issued to Ficon employees and its principal
shareholder, contingent upon continued employment with the merged
companies. GlobeSpan recorded deferred compensation of approximately
$29,522 to be amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period in
accordance with EITF 95-8, "Accounting for Contingent Consideration Paid to
Shareholders of
24
<PAGE>
an Acquired Enterprise in a Purchase Business Combination," generally three
years, or $9,833 per year or $819 per month. Such compensation expense has
been included as a pro forma adjustment.
In addition, up to an additional 999,999 shares of common stock
("Contingent Shares") may be issuable six months after GlobeSpan has
validated release 3 of the Ficon software (the "Milestone Date"). In the
event that the Milestone Date is achieved more than 12 months after the
closing date, then the number of Contingent Shares to be issued is
reduced, as provided in the merger agreement. The Contingent Shares will be
released to the named Ficon employees and principal shareholder over a
period of 42 months, upon completion of certain development activities as
provided in the merger agreement. No amounts have been included in these
pro forma financial statements related to the Contingent Shares.
(f) On February 24, 2000, GlobeSpan acquired certain technology and employees
of Microelectronics Group of PairGain Technologies, Inc. (PairGain). In
connection with the PairGain assets acquisition, GlobeSpan (1) exchanged
3,243,591 shares of its common stock valued at $152,706, based upon
GlobeSpan's stock price a few days before and after the companies reached
agreement and the proposed transaction was announced and (2) issued a
$90,000 subordinated redeemable convertible note.
The pro forma adjustments reflect twelve months of amortization expense for
the year ended December 31, 1999 and approximately two months of
amortization for the six months ended June 30, 2000, assuming the
transaction had occurred on January 1, 1999. The value of intangible assets
acquired from PairGain at January 1, 1999 was approximately $242,706,
amortized over four years, which is the estimated period of benefit. Such
amount approximates $60,677 per year or $10,112 for two months through
February 24, 2000, the date of acquisition.
(g) The pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by
dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. The weighted average number of
common shares outstanding reflect 2,022,290 shares of GlobeSpan's common
stock issued in connection with its acquisition of T.sqware, of which
1,300,082 is the incremental shares outstanding for the period January 1,
2000 through April 27, 2000.
(h) The pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by
dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, reflecting an additional
3,470,152 shares of GlobeSpan's common stock issued in connection with its
acquisition of iCompression and is assumed to be outstanding for the entire
period.
(i) The pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed by
dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, reflecting an additional
444,160 and 148,053 shares of GlobeSpan's common stock at December 31, 1999
and June 30, 2000, respectively, consisting of 186,240 shares issued in
connection with its acquisition of Ficon and is assumed to be outstanding
for the entire period ended December 31, 1999 and for one month in the
period ended June 30, 2000; and 257,920 (equivalent to one year's vesting)
shares earned in connection with the continued employment of certain Ficon
employees and its principal shareholder, assumed to be outstanding for the
entire period ended December 31, 1999 and for one month in the period ended
June 30, 2000.
25
<PAGE>
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
We are registering for resale certain shares of our common stock held by
the stockholders identified below. The following table sets forth:
o The names of the selling stockholders;
o The number and percent of our common stock that the selling stockholders
beneficially owned prior to the offering for resale of any of the shares of
our common stock being registered by the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part;
o The number of shares of our common stock that may be offered for resale for
the account of the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus; and
o The number and percent of our common stock to be held by the selling
stockholders after the offering of the resale shares (assuming all of the
resale shares are sold by the selling stockholders).
This information is based on information provided by the selling
stockholders and assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the selling
stockholders. The applicable percentages of ownership are based on an aggregate
of 71,603,630 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of September 25,
2000.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Shares Beneficially Owned Shares Being Shares Beneficially Owned
Prior To This Offering Offered After This Offering
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Selling Stockholder Number Percent Number Percent
ADC DSL Systems, Inc. 2,307,616 3.2% 2,307,616 0 *
Michel Desbard(1) 61,741 * 51,924 9,817 *
Cesar Douady(2) 55,570 * 51,924 3,646 *
Alain Fanet(3) 55,570 * 51,924 3,646 *
Tom McQuade(4) 14,125 * 6,573 7,552 *
Rand Kay 4,039 * 4,039 0 *
Varadaraj P. Shenoy 3,576 * 3,576 0 *
Gilles Chatre 1,472 * 1,472 0 *
Yves Roumazeilles 1,413 * 1,413 0 *
Terry Whalen(5) 3,265 * 1,400 1,865 *
Wayne Taylor 1,346 * 1,346 0 *
Michael Edwards(6) 3,520 * 1,290 2,230 *
Michael Santoro 785 * 785 0 *
Xavier Marchand 1,008 * 565 443 *
Pierre Andre Lariviere 521 * 521 0 *
Bing Cheng 364 * 364 0 *
Martha Bond 246 * 246 0 *
Kenneth J. Virnig 201 * 201 0 *
Bob Murphy 100 * 100 0 *
Eric Pirpich(7) 133 * 67 66 *
Trudi Fink 33 * 33 0 *
Jack Hodges 33 * 33 0 *
Jeff Leontini 33 * 33 0 *
Joe Marella 33 * 33 0 *
John Rose 33 * 33 0 *
Admirals L.P. 78,177 * 78,177 0 *
Alta California Partners, L.P. 152,716 * 152,716 0 *
Alta Embarcadero Partners, LLC 3,488 * 3,488 0 *
Atlas Ventures Fund III, L.P. 175,725 * 175,725 0 *
26
<PAGE>
Atlas Ventures Entrepreneur's Fund III, 3,820 * 3,820 0 *
L.P.
Codexi S.A. 61,719 * 61,719 0 *
Current Ventures II Limited 8,977 * 8,977 0 *
D.R.W. Investors, L.L.C. 15,710 * 15,710 0 *
Dain Rauscher Incorporated 3,953 * 3,953 0 *
ECICS Ventures 2 Ltd. 20,866 * 20,866 0 *
ECICS Ventures Pte Ltd. 10,399 * 10,399 0 *
Firsthand Technology Innovators Fund 14,962 * 14,962 0 *
Gilbert Global Equity Partners, L.P. 177,824 * 177,824 0 *
GCEP/GECC Equity Partners, L.P. 22,175 * 22,175 0 *
Gilbert Global Equity Partners 54,357 * 54,357 0 *
(Bermuda), L.P.
Innovacom 2 53,864 * 53,864 0 *
Jerusalem Venture Partners L.P. 151,798 * 151,798 0 *
Jerusalem Venture Partners (Israel) L.P. 12,967 * 12,967 0 *
Level One Communications, Incorporated 134,660 * 134,660 0 *
Matra Participations S.A. 114,461 * 114,461 0 *
MCP Global Corporation Ltd. 7,481 * 7,481 0 *
Merrill Lynch KECALP L.P. 1999 33,665 33,665 0
Merrill Lynch As Nominee For Merrill 3,740 * 3,740 0 *
Lynch KECALP International L.P. 1999
RS Emerging Growth Pacific Partners 7,250 * 7,250 0 *
RS Emerging Growth Partners LP 3,411 * 3,411 0 *
RS Emerging Growth Premium Partners 4,299 * 4,299 0 *
Seligman New Technologies Fund, Inc. 35,460 * 35,460 0 *
Seligman New Investment Opportunities 9,426 * 9,426 0 *
(Master) Fund-NTV Portfolio
Sofinnova Capital II FCPR 100,770 * 100,770 0 *
CV Sofinnova Venture Partners III 51,619 * 51,619 0 *
Transatlantic Venture Fund C.V. 44,886 * 44,886 0 *
Walden-SBIC, L.P. 45,570 * 45,570 0 *
O,W & W Investments Ltd. 39,082 * 39,082 0 *
International Venture Capital Investment 19,541 * 19,541 0 *
Corp.
O,W&W Pacrim Investments Ltd. 19,541 * 19,541 0 *
Seed Ventures II, Ltd. 19,541 * 19,541 0 *
Walden EDB Partners, L.P. 19,541 * 19,541 0 *
Walden Investors 11,724 * 11,724 0 *
Walden Technology Ventures II, L.P. 9,145 * 9,145 0 *
Walden Ventures 7,924 * 7,924 0 *
Walden Capital Partners 3,908 * 3,908 0 *
WS Investment Company 99B 748 * 748 0 *
Robert A. Claassen 149 * 149 0 *
John Fore 149 * 149 0 *
Chad W. Keck 4,039 * 4,039 0 *
OM Associates Stk., Ltd. 2,244 * 2,244 0 *
Joe W. Dews 1,571 * 1,571 0 *
Christopher J. Schaepe 1,346 * 1,346 0 *
Anthony Abramo 1,122 * 1,122 0 *
Mark W. Powers 1,122 * 1,122 0 *
Chelsey Capital 5,984 * 5,984 0 *
Palantir Partners 3,740 * 3,740 0 *
Ziff Asset Management 3,740 * 3,740 0 *
Zodiac Venture Fund I, LLC 2,992 * 2,992 0 *
John W. Allison 2,244 * 2,244 0 *
Colonial Venture Fund XX, LLC 1,795 * 1,795 0 *
Robert Betcher 1,496 * 1,496 0 *
Gilliland Group Family Partnership 1,496 * 1,496 0 *
Greyhound Crossover Fund LP 1,496 * 1,496 0 *
Kingdon Partners 1,496 * 1,496 0 *
Lloyd E. Smith 1,496 * 1,496 0 *
27
<PAGE>
Stephen & Abigail Johnson Trust Under 448 * 448 0 *
the Agreement dated January 26, 1998
Infonetics Research, Inc. 374 * 374 0 *
Zweite Beteiliguns-Kommanditgesellschaft 8,491 * 6,796 1,695 *
der TVM Techno Venture Management GmbH &
Co. KG
TVM Eurotech Limited Partnership 5,603 * 4,484 1,119 *
Alpinvest International B.V. 8,754 * 7,006 1,748 *
KBL Founders Ventures S.C.A. 6,302 * 5,044 1,258 *
Gerd Ascheid 1,351 * 1,081 270 *
Ruth Diekmann-Noll 2,702 * 2,162 540 *
Pierre Fougere 1,280 * 1,024 256 *
Heinrich Meyr 3,259 * 2,608 651 *
Joachim Noll 4,927 * 3,943 984 *
Vivek Bansal 744,960 * 744,960 0 *
Amit Gaur 148,357 * 148,357 0 *
Ashok Gupta 24,000 * 24,000 0 *
Ajay Sharma 4,800 * 4,800 0 *
Alan Harry 9,523 * 9,523 0 *
Mark Rousseau 9,523 * 9,523 0 *
Felix Hernandez 6,666 * 6,666 0 *
Eduardo Hernandez 2,859 * 2,859 0 *
Rakesh Shah 9,312 * 9,312 0 *
Bernard Debbasch 3,864 * 3,864 0 *
Neal Riedel 2,319 * 2,319 0 *
</TABLE>
* Indicates less than 1%.
1. Includes 9,817 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
2. Includes 3,646 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
3. Includes 3,646 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
4. Includes 7,552 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
5. Includes 1,865 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
6. Includes 2,230 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60
days of September 25, 2000.
7. Includes 66 shares subject to options which are exercisable within 60 days
of September 25, 2000.
28
<PAGE>
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are being registered
to allow public secondary trading by the holders of these shares from time to
time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds
from the offering of these shares by the selling stockholders.
We have been advised by the selling stockholders that the shares offered by
this prospectus may be sold from time to time by or for the account of the
selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus or, in some cases, pursuant to
Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. Sales of shares pursuant to this
prospectus may be made in the over-the-counter market, on the Nasdaq National
Market or otherwise at prices and on terms then prevailing or at prices related
to the then current market price (in each case as determined by the selling
stockholders). Sales may be made directly or through agents designated from time
to time, or through dealers or underwriters to be designated or in negotiated
transactions.
The shares may be sold in one or more of the following ways:
o a block trade in which the seller's broker or dealer will attempt to sell
the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as
principal to facilitate the transaction;
o purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by the broker or
dealer for their account pursuant to this prospectus;
o an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq
National Market;
o ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker
solicits purchasers;
o privately negotiated transactions;
o through put or call option transactions;
o through short sales; or
o an underwritten public offering.
The selling stockholders may sell shares directly to other purchasers,
through agents or through broker-dealers. Any selling agents or broker-dealers
may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions or
commissions from the selling stockholders, from purchasers of shares for whom
they act as agents, or from both sources. That compensation may be in excess of
customary commissions.
The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers that participate in the
distribution of the shares may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended in connection with the sales. Any
commissions, and any profit on the resale of shares, received by the selling
stockholders and any such broker-dealers may be deemed to be underwriting
discounts and commissions. We have been advised by each of the selling
stockholders that they have not, as of the date of this prospectus, entered into
any arrangement with any agent, broker or dealer for the sale of the shares.
We may suspend the use of this prospectus and any supplements hereto in
certain circumstances due to pending corporate developments, public filings with
the SEC or similar events.
29
<PAGE>
We will pay all costs and expenses incurred by us in connection with the
registration of the sale of shares pursuant to this prospectus. We will not be
responsible for any commissions, underwriting discounts or similar charges on
sales of the shares.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of common stock by
the selling stockholders.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us
by Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
The financial statements incorporated in this prospectus by reference to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GlobeSpan, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 1999 and the audited historical financial statements of Ficon Technology,
Inc. included on pages 1 through 11 of GlobeSpan, Inc.'s Form 8-K dated April
14, 2000 have been so incorporated in reliance on the reports of
PricewaterCoopers LLP, independent accountants, given on the authority of said
firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of T.sqware, Inc. (a development
stage company) at December 31, 1998 and 1999 and for the years then ended and
for the period from February 11, 1997 (Inception) to December 31, 1999,
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and Registration Statement have
been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their
report thereon incorporated by reference herein, and are incorporated by
reference herein in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such
firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of iCompression, Inc. (a development stage
company) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the years then ended
and for the period of August 1, 1996 (Inception) to December 31, 1999,
incorporated by reference in this prospectus, have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report, which is
incorporated herein by reference, and have been so incorporated in reliance upon
the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
30
<PAGE>
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses payable by GlobeSpan
in connection with the issuance and distribution of the common stock being
registered. All amounts are estimates except the SEC registration fee and the
NASD filing fees.
SEC registration fee $ 140,659
Printing and engraving expenses 10,000
Legal fees and expenses 10,000
Accounting fees and expenses 10,000
Miscellaneous fees and expenses 1,000
----------
Total $ 171,659
==========
ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law authorizes a court to
award or a corporation's Board of Directors to grant indemnification to
directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such
indemnification under specified circumstances for liabilities (including
reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the "Securities Act"). Article VII, Section 6, of the Registrant's
bylaws provides for mandatory indemnification of its directors and officers and
permissible indemnification of employees and other agents to the maximum extent
permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Registrant's certificate
of incorporation provides that, pursuant to Delaware law, its directors shall
not be liable for monetary damages for breach of the directors' fiduciary duty
as directors to GlobeSpan and its stockholders. This provision in the
certificate of incorporation does not eliminate the directors' fiduciary duty,
and in appropriate circumstances equitable remedies such as injunctive or other
forms of non-monetary relief will remain available under Delaware law. In
addition, each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach of
the director's duty of loyalty to GlobeSpan for acts or omissions not in good
faith or involving intentional misconduct, for knowing violations of law, for
actions leading to improper personal benefit to the director, and for payment of
dividends or approval of stock repurchases or redemptions that are unlawful
under Delaware law. The provision also does not affect a director's
responsibilities under any other law, such as the federal securities laws or
state or federal environmental laws.
II-1
<PAGE>
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Registrant, FTI Acquisition
Corp. and Ficon Technology, Inc., dated January 12, 2000 (incorporated
into this document by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
2.2 Asset Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and PairGain
Technologies, Inc., dated January 24, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Registrant, Needles Acquisition
Corp. and T.sqware, Inc., dated April 20, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2000).
2.4 Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among the
Registrant, Indigo Acquisition Corp. and iCompression, Inc., dated
June 13, 2000 (incorporated into this document by reference to Exhibit
2.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on
July 3, 2000 (File No. 333-40782)).
4.1 Specimen Common Stock certificate (incorporated into this document by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173)).
4.2 Warrant for the purchase of Common Stock made by the Registrant and
held by Cisco Systems, Inc., dated May 6, 1999 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173)).
4.3 Warrant for the purchase of Common Stock made by the Registrant and
held by Cisco Systems, Inc., dated May 6, 1999 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173).
4.4 Investors's Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 1999, between the
Registrant, Intel Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Communication
Partners, L.P. (incorporated into this document by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-75173)).
4.5 Registration Rights Agreement between the Registrant and PairGain
Technologies, Inc., dated February 24, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
4.6 Registration Rights Agreement between the Several Persons named in
Annex I thereto, dated January 28, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on July 7,
2000).
5.1 Opinion of Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol.
II-2
<PAGE>
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
23.2 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.3 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
23.4 Consent of Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol (included in
Exhibit 5.1).
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in the signature page of the Registration
Statement).
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made,
a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:
(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the
Securities Act of 1933;
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the
effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent
post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the
aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth
in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total
dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was
registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed
with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the
changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in
the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of
Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement.
(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of
distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or
any material change to such information in the registration statement;
Provided, however, that paragraphs (i) and (ii) above do not apply if the
information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those
paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished to the
Commission by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are incorporated by reference in the
registration statement.
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona
fide offering thereof.
(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of
the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the
offering.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the
registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or
II-3
<PAGE>
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable,
each filing of an employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section
15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Certificate of
Incorporation or the Bylaws of the registrant or otherwise, the registrant has
been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and
is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses
incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered hereunder, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel
the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by
the final adjudication of such issue.
II-4
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant
has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Red Bank, State of New
Jersey, on this 5th day of October, 2000.
GLOBESPAN, INC.
By: /s/ Armando Geday
-------------------------------------
Armando Geday
President and Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Armando Geday and Robert McMullan, and
each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power
of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)
to this Registration Statement, and to sign any registration statement for the
same offering covered by this Registration Statement that is to be effective
upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) promulgated under the Securities Act of
1933, and all post-effective amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or his or
their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED,
THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE
CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED:
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
President, Chief Executive Officer October 5, 2000
/s/ Armando Geday (Principal Executive Officer)
--------------------- Director
Armando Geday
Chief Financial Officer October 5, 2000
(Principal Financial and Accounting
/s/ Robert McMullan Officer)
---------------------
Robert McMullan
--------------------- Director October 5, 2000
Thomas Epley
II-5
<PAGE>
/s/ Keith Geeslin Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
Keith Geeslin
/s/ David Stanton Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
David Stanton
/s/ Dipanjan Deb Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
Dipanjan Deb
--------------------- Director October 5, 2000
James Coulter
/s/ John Marren Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
John Marren
/s/ Barbara Connor Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
Barbara Connor
/s/ Federico Faggin Director October 5, 2000
---------------------
Federico Faggin
II-6
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Registrant, FTI Acquisition
Corp. and Ficon Technology, Inc., dated January 12, 2000 (incorporated
into this document by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
2.2 Asset Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and PairGain
Technologies, Inc., dated January 24, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger among the Registrant, Needles Acquisition
Corp. and T.sqware, Inc., dated April 20, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2000).
2.4 Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger among the
Registrant, Indigo Acquisition Corp. and iCompression, Inc., dated
June 13, 2000 (incorporated into this document by reference to Exhibit
2.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on
July 3, 2000 (File No. 333-40782)).
4.1 Specimen Common Stock certificate (incorporated into this document by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173)).
4.2 Warrant for the purchase of Common Stock made by the Registrant and
held by Cisco Systems, Inc., dated May 6, 1999 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173)).
4.3 Warrant for the purchase of Common Stock made by the Registrant and
held by Cisco Systems, Inc., dated May 6, 1999 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-75173).
4.4 Investors's Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 1999, between the
Registrant, Intel Corporation, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Communication
Partners, L.P. (incorporated into this document by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-75173)).
4.5 Registration Rights Agreement between the Registrant and PairGain
Technologies, Inc., dated February 24, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2000).
4.6 Registration Rights Agreement between the Several Persons named in
Annex I thereto, dated January 28, 2000 (incorporated into this
document by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on July 7,
2000).
II-7
<PAGE>
5.1 Opinion of Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol.
23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
23.2 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.3 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
23.4 Consent of Reboul, MacMurray, Hewitt, Maynard & Kristol (included in
Exhibit 5.1).
24.1 Power of Attorney (included in the signature page of the Registration
Statement).
II-8
