NTL DELAWARE INC
424B3, 2001-01-19
CABLE & OTHER PAY TELEVISION SERVICES
Previous: CPS AUTO RECEIVABLES TRUST 1998-4, 8-K, EX-20.17, 2001-01-19
Next: VERFAILLIE HENDRIK A, 4/A, 2001-01-19


<PAGE>   1

                                                              Filed pursuant to
                                                              Rule 424 (b)(3)
                                                              Reg Nos. 333-36434
                                                              and 333-36434-01

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NO. 15
(To Prospectus dated August 30, 2000)

NTL (Delaware), Inc.
5 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2009
NTL Incorporated
Shares of Common Stock

This Prospectus Supplement No. 15 supplements and amends the Prospectus dated
August 30, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 1 dated September 26, 2000, the
Prospectus Supplement No. 2 dated October 5, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement No.
3 dated October 18, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 4 dated October 19,
2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 5 dated October 27, 2000, the Prospectus
Supplement No. 6 dated November 1, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 7 dated
November 1, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 8 dated November 9, 2000, the
Prospectus Supplement No. 9 dated November 16, 2000, the Prospectus Supplement
No. 10 dated December 1, 2000, Prospectus Supplement No. 11 dated December 6,
2000, the Prospectus Supplement No. 12 dated December 12, 2000, the Prospectus
Supplement No. 13 dated January 4, 2001 and the Prospectus Supplement No. 14
dated January 19, 2001 relating to the 5 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due
2009 of NTL (Delaware), Inc. and the shares of NTL Incorporated's common stock,
par value $.01 per share, issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.

The table on pages 46 through 47 of the Prospectus sets forth information with
respect to the Selling Security Holders (as defined in the Prospectus) and the
respective amounts of Convertible Notes beneficially owned by each Selling
Security Holder that may be offered pursuant to the Prospectus. This Prospectus
Supplement amends that table by adding the following Selling Security Holders,
or to the extent such persons are already named as Selling Security Holders, by
amending the respective amounts of Convertible Notes beneficially owned.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        PRINCIPAL            PERCENT OF              COMMON
                                        AMOUNT OF               TOTAL              STOCK OWNED               COMMON
                                       CONVERTIBLE            PRINCIPAL              PRIOR TO             STOCK TO BE
      SELLING SECURITY                    NOTES               AMOUNT OF              ORIGINAL            REGISTERED BY
          HOLDERS                          ($)               OUTSTANDING             OFFERING            THE PROSPECTUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                       <C>                    <C>               <C>

Anima S.G.R.p.A.
Rubrica-Anima
Convertibile                          1,000,000                    *                     -                 9,243.5

Anita T. Pagliaro                       100,000                    *                     -                   924.35

Carl Von Bernuth                        400,000                    *                     -                 3,697.4

Fidelity Management Trust
Company on its behalf and
for accounts managed by it              340,000                    *                     -                 3,142.79

Jean Von Bernuth
Thompson                                100,000                    *                     -                   924.35

Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter                                1,300,000                    *                     -                12,016.55
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

*  Less than one percent

The Prospectus, together with Prospectus Supplement No. 1, Prospectus Supplement
No. 2, Prospectus Supplement No. 3, Prospectus Supplement No. 4, Prospectus
Supplement No. 5, Prospectus Supplement No. 6, Prospectus Supplement No. 7,
Prospectus Supplement No. 8, Prospectus Supplement No. 9, Prospectus Supplement
No. 10, Prospectus Supplement No. 11, Prospectus Supplement No. 12, Prospectus
Supplement No. 13, Prospectus Supplement No. 14 and this Prospectus Supplement
No. 15 constitutes the prospectus required to be delivered by Section 5(b) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to offers and sales of the
Convertible Notes and the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes.

Prospective investors should carefully consider matters discussed under the
caption "Risk Factors" beginning on page 4 of the Prospectus.

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A
CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The date of this Prospectus Supplement No. 15 is January 19, 2001.



Top Judgements:
Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd. | Aug 12, 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc. | May 31, 2022
Markowich v. Lundin Mining Corporation | Jan 6, 2022
Canada (National Revenue) v. Ghermezian | Feb 23, 2022
Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local Unions 835 v South Shore District Health Authority | Jan 17, 2015
Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. | Sep 16, 2016
Canadian Airport Workers Union v Goodwill Industries | Mar 4, 2022
Cassan v. The Queen | Sep 8, 2017
Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association, I.A.A.F. Local 3888 v City of Toronto | Aug 26, 2022
Cambie Surgeries Corporation v. British Columbia (Attorney General) | Sep 10, 2020
Cowichan Tribes v Canada | Jun 3, 2022
Brain cancer (glioblastoma multiforme) | ONWSIAT Decision No. 1642/21 | Jul 18, 2022
Konicek v Vantown Infrastructure Invesco Inc. | Sep 9, 2022
C.S.S. Office Furniture Systems Service Inc. v Burns | Aug 11, 2022
Saskatoon Co-operative Association Limited v United Food and Commercial Workers | Aug 15, 2022
Old Lakeshore Inc. v City of Burlington | Sep 2, 2022
Tietz v. Affinor Growers Inc. | Sep 13, 2022
Efficiencyone (E1) | Sep 6, 2022
President's Choice Bank v. The Queen | Jul 19, 2022
First Global Data Ltd | Sep 15, 2022
Rayonier v Unifor, Locals 256 and 89 | Aug 11, 2022
Alberta Workers’ Compensation Appeals Commission | Decision No. 2021-0334 | Jul 14, 2022
Metrowest Developments Ltd v Flynn Canada Ltd | Sep 14, 2022
R. v. Cameron | Jul 15, 2022
Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management | Jul 28, 2022
101034761 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Mossing | Aug 24, 2022
Waste Control Services Inc. v International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 115 | Aug 12, 2022
RJM56 Holdings Inc. c. Bazinet | Aug 17, 2022
Sherwood v The Owners, Strata Plan VIS 1549 | Aug 9, 2022
WCAT Decision A2001487 | Aug 8, 2022
City of Hamilton v Ontario Water Employees’ Association | Sep 12, 2022
Century Services Corp. v. LeRoy | Jul 8, 2022
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175 v Metro Ontario Inc. | Jul 4, 2022
Langmaid’s Island Corporation v Lake of Bays | Sep 12, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102416 | Jul 22, 2022
Inquiry about McAbee Fossil beds | Jul 14, 2022
1088558 Ontario Inc. v. Musial | Sep 16, 2022
Biogen Canada Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc. | Aug 8, 2022
CIC Management Services Inc. v City of Toronto | Jul 21, 2022
Bonterra Energy Corp v Rosells’ Enterprises Ltd | Aug 31, 2022
WCAT Decision A2100606 | Aug 17, 2022
Leffler v Aaron Behiel Legal Professional Corporation | Jun 30, 2022
Espartel Investments v. MTCC No. 993 | Aug 19, 2022
Onespace Unlimited Inc. v. Plus Development Group Corp. | Sep 19, 2022
Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Canada Revenue Agency | Jun 23, 2022
Community Savings Credit Union v. Bodnar | Jul 29, 2022
Galperti SRL v F.I.A.L. Finanziaria Industrie Alto Lario S.P.A | Jun 30, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102352 | Jul 6, 2022
WCAT Decision A2102306 | Jul 25, 2022
Thrive Capital Management Ltd. v. Noble 1324 Queen Inc. | Jul 12, 2022
Questor Technology Inc v Stagg | Sep 8, 2022
MediPharm v. Hexo and Hwang | Jul 25, 2022
Immunization rates & vaccine hesitancy | Aug 17, 2022
Morabito v. British Columbia Securities Commission | Aug 12, 2022
Killeleagh v Mountain View County (Development Authority) | Aug 24, 2022
Quality Control Council v Stanley Inspection Canada Ltd. | Sep 9, 2022
British Columbia Investment Management Corporation | Aug 17, 2022
Abbeylawn Manor Living Inc. v Sevice Employees International Union, Local 1 Canada | Jul 5, 2022
Windrift Adventures Inc. et al. v. Chief Animal Welfare Inspector | Aug 18, 2022
Irani and Khan v. Registrar, Motor Vehicle Dealers Act | Jul 14, 2022
CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited v City of Toronto | Aug 12, 2022
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. v. The Queen | Jul 7, 2022
Wong v. Pretium Resources Inc. | Jul 22, 2022
Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183, Union v Mulmer Services Ltd. | Aug 5, 2022

© 2022 IncJournal is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission